Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2010
Registration No. 333-      
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 
Rockville Financial New, Inc. and
Rockville Bank 401(k) Plan
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
         
Connecticut
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  6712
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  Being Applied for
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 
25 Park Street
Rockville, CT 06066
(860) 291-3600
(Address and telephone of registrant’s principal executive offices)
 
William J. McGurk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Rockville Financial New, Inc.
25 Park Street
Rockville, CT 06066
(860) 291-3600
(Address and telephone number of registrant’s agent for service)
 
Copies to:
William W. Bouton III, Esq.
Robert J. Metzler II, Esq.
Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP
20 Church Street
Hartford, CT 06103
(860) 725-6200
 
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:   As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.
 
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box:   o
 
If this Form is filed to register additional shares for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:   o
 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:   o
 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:   o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  þ Non-accelerated filer  o Smaller reporting company  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
 
                             
            Proposed Maximum
    Proposed Maximum
    Amount of
Title of Each Class of
    Amount
    Offering
    Aggregate
    Registration
Securities to be Registered     to be Registered     Price per Share     Offering Price(1)     Fee
Common Stock, no par value per share
    29,545,455 shares(2)     $10.00     $295,454,550       $21,066.00    
Participation interests
                        (2)  
                             
 
(1)  Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee.
 
(2)  The securities of Rockville Financial New, Inc. to be purchased by Rockville Bank 401(k) Plan are included in the amount shown for the common stock, and accordance with Rule 457(h) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, no separate fee is required for the registration of the participation interests.
 
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
 


Table of Contents

Prospectus Supplement
 
Interests in
 
ROCKVILLE BANK
401(k) PLAN
Offering of Participation Interests in up to 663,032 Shares of
 
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL NEW, INC.
Common Stock
 
This prospectus supplement relates to the offer and sale to participants in the Rockville Bank 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”) of participation interests and shares of common stock of Rockville Financial New, Inc., a newly formed Connecticut stock corporation, referred to in this prospectus supplement as “New Rockville Financial.” New Rockville Financial is offering shares of its common stock in connection with the “second step” conversion of Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. from the mutual holding company form of organization to the stock holding company form of organization.
 
Plan participants may direct the trustee for the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund to use up to 100% of current account balances (not currently invested in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund), to purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock through the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund. Based upon the value of the Plan assets as of June 30, 2010, the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund trustee may purchase up to 663,032 shares of New Rockville Financial common stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. This prospectus supplement relates to the election of Plan participants to direct the Plan trustee to invest up to 100% of their Plan account balances in shares of New Rockville Financial common stock.
 
The New Rockville Financial prospectus dated          , 2010, which we have attached to this prospectus supplement, includes detailed information regarding the offering of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock and the financial condition, results of operations and business of Rockville Bank and Rockville Financial, Inc. This prospectus supplement provides information regarding the Plan. You should read this prospectus supplement together with the prospectus and keep each for future reference.
 
THESE SECURITIES ARE NOT BANK DEPOSITS AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, NOR ARE THEY OBLIGATIONS OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, A BANK.
 
THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF PRINCIPAL. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE SECTION ENTITLED “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 20 OF THIS PROSPECTUS.
 
NEITHER THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY BODY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
 
This prospectus supplement may be used only in connection with offers and sales by New Rockville Financial of participation interests or shares of common stock under the Plan in the offering. No one may use this prospectus supplement to re-offer or resell interests or shares of common stock acquired through the Plan.
 
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus supplement and the attached prospectus. Neither New Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank nor the Plan have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different.
 
This prospectus supplement does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make an offer or solicitation in that jurisdiction. Neither the delivery of this prospectus supplement and the prospectus nor any sale of participation interests or shares of common stock shall under any circumstances imply that there has been no change in the affairs of New Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank or the Plan since the date of this prospectus supplement, or that the information contained in this prospectus supplement or incorporated by reference is correct as of any time after the date of this prospectus supplement.
 
The date of this prospectus supplement is          , 2010.


Table of Contents

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    S-1  
    S-1  
    S-1  
    S-2  
    S-2  
    S-2  
    S-2  
    S-3  
    S-3  
    S-3  
       
    S-3  
    S-3  
    S-4  
    S-5  
    S-6  
    S-13  
    S-18  
    S-20  
    S-20  
    S-21  
    S-22  
    S-22  
       
    S-22  


Table of Contents

 
THE OFFERING
 
Securities Offered
 
The securities offered in connection with this prospectus supplement are participation interests in the Plan. New Rockville Financial is offering common stock in connection with the conversion of Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. from the mutual holding company form of organization to the stock holding company form of organization. At a purchase price of $10.00 per share, the Plan trustee may acquire up to 663,032 shares of New Rockville Financial common stock in the stock offering. Certain subscription rights and purchase limitations also govern your investment in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund in connection with the offering. See “The Conversion and Offering — Subscription Offering and Subscription Rights” and “— Limitations on Purchases of Shares” in the prospectus attached to this prospectus supplement for further discussion of these subscription rights and purchase limitations.
 
The shares of Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock currently held in the Plan will automatically be exchanged for shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial pursuant to an exchange ratio as more fully described in the prospectus attached to this prospectus supplement. See “The Conversion and Offering — Share Exchange Ratio for Current Shareholders.” Any new shares you purchase in the offering will be added to the shares that you receive in the exchange described above. All of these shares will be maintained in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund.
 
This prospectus supplement contains information regarding the Plan. The attached prospectus contains information regarding the offering and the financial condition, results of operations and business of Rockville Bank and Rockville Financial, Inc. The address of the principal executive office of New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank is 25 Park Street, Rockville, Connecticut 06066. Rockville Bank’s telephone number at this address is (860) 291-3600.
 
Election to Purchase Common Stock
 
In connection with the offering, you may elect to transfer all or part of the funds which represent your account balance in the Plan, excluding your current investment in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, to the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund. The Plan trustee will subscribe for shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in accordance with each participant’s directions. However, such directions are subject to purchase priorities and purchase limitations, as described below.
 
All Plan participants are eligible to direct a transfer of funds to the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund. However, transfer directions are subject to subscription rights, purchase priorities and purchase limitations. The shares of New Rockville Financial common stock are first being offered at $10.00 per share in a subscription offering in the following descending order of priority:
 
1. To depositors with accounts at Rockville Bank with aggregate balances of at least $50.00 at the close of business on June 30, 2009;
 
2. To our tax-qualified employee benefit plans (including the Plan and our employee stock ownership plan);
 
3. To depositors with accounts at Rockville Bank with aggregate balances of at least $50.00 at the close of business on          .
 
If you fall into subscription offering categories (1) or (3), you have subscription rights to purchase New Rockville Financial common stock in the subscription offering and you may use funds in your Plan account to pay for the shares. You may be able to purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock in the subscription offering even though you are ineligible to purchase through subscription offering categories (1) or (3) because New Rockville Financial is allowing the Plan to purchase stock through subscription offering category (2), reserved for its tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans. Subscription offering orders will have preference over orders placed in a community offering or syndicated community offering.


S-1


Table of Contents

The limitations on the total amount of New Rockville Financial common stock that you may purchase in the offering, as described in the prospectus (see “The Conversion and Offering — Limitations on Purchases of Shares”) will be calculated based on the aggregate amount that you subscribed for (i) through your Plan accounts; and (ii) through your sources of funds outside of the Plan by placing an order in the stock offering using a Stock Order Form. Whether you place an order through the Plan, outside the Plan, or both, the number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock, if any, that you receive will be determined based on the total number of subscriptions, your purchase priority and the allocation priorities set forth in the prospectus. If, as a result of the calculation, there are insufficient shares to fill all of your orders, available shares will be allocated as described in “The Conversion and Offering — Subscription Offering and Subscription Rights” in the prospectus. Available shares will be allocated between your Plan order and your order outside of the Plan. If you so elect, the shares of New Rockville Financial common stock you were unable to subscribe for through the Plan will be purchased by the Plan trustee on the open market immediately following the completion of the offering. If you elect to direct the Plan trustee to purchase shares in the open market, you will not be able to direct the Plan trustee as to the timing or price to be paid for the common stock. The Plan trustee has sole discretion regarding the manner in which it will fill open market purchases.
 
Value of Participation Interests
 
As of June 30, 2010, the market value of the Plan assets (less those assets already invested in Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock) equaled approximately $6,630,328.11. The Plan Administrator has informed each participant of the value of his or her beneficial interest in the Plan as of June 30, 2010. The value of the Plan assets represents past contributions made to the Plan on your behalf, plus or minus earnings or losses on the contributions, less previous withdrawals and loans. Participants will be able to use up to 100% of their Plan account balances (which are not already invested in Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock) to purchase shares in the stock offering through the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund.
 
How to Order
 
To facilitate your investment in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund in connection with the offering, you must complete, sign, and submit the form included with this prospectus supplement (the “Transfer Form”). To invest in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund you must direct the Plan trustee to transfer a percentage of your beneficial interest in the assets of the Plan to the Rockville Financial, Inc. Stock Fund (in multiples of 1.0%). If you do not wish to invest in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund at this time, you do not need to take any action. The minimum investment in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund during the offering is $500 for orders placed through the Plan, plus orders placed outside the Plan. Your investment in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, plus orders placed outside Plan, together cannot exceed 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering.
 
Timing for Directing Transfer
 
Your Transfer Form must be received by            at           by 12:00 noon on [Date 2]. Current Rockville Bank employees should return their forms through inter-office mail. Former Rockville Bank employees should return their forms using the business reply envelope that has been provided.
 
If you have any questions regarding the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund or completing the Transfer Form, please contact           at (          )           .
 
Questions about the stock offering or about the prospectus should be directed to the Stock Information Center, toll-free at (          )           .
 
Irrevocability of Transfer Direction
 
Once you have submitted your Transfer Form, you cannot change your direction to transfer amounts credited to your account in the Plan to the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund. Following the closing of the offering and the initial purchase of shares in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, you may change your investment directions in accordance with the terms of the Plan.


S-2


Table of Contents

 
Purchase Price of Common Stock
 
The trustee will use the funds transferred to the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund to purchase shares of New Rockville common stock in the stock offering. The Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund trustee will pay $10.00 per share, which is the same price for shares of New Rockville Financial common stock as all other persons who purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock in the offering will pay. If there is not enough common stock available in the offering to fill all subscriptions, the common stock will be allocated as described in “The Conversion and Offering — Subscription Offering and Subscription Rights” and the trustee may not be able to purchase all of the common stock you requested. If you elect, the Plan trustee will purchase shares on your behalf after the completion of the stock offering in the open market to fulfill the shares remaining from your initial request. If you elect to direct the Plan trustee to purchase shares in the open market you will not be able to direct the Plan trustee as to the timing or price to be paid for the common stock. The Plan trustee has sole discretion regarding the manner in which it will fill open market purchases. The Plan trustee may make such purchases at prices higher or lower than the $10.00 offering price and, therefore, you may receive more or less shares than initially requested.
 
Nature of a Participant’s Interest in Common Stock
 
The trustee will hold New Rockville Financial common stock in the name of the Plan. The trustee will credit shares of New Rockville Financial common stock acquired at your direction to your account under the Plan. Therefore, the investment designations of other Plan participants will not affect earnings on your Plan account.
 
Voting Rights and Tender Rights
 
Each participant may instruct the trustee as to the manner in which any shares of New Rockville Financial common stock held in any account designated to invest in securities of New Rockville Financial (or securities of an unrelated company that may be distributed with respect to the securities of Rockville Financial, Inc. by reason of a spin-off or otherwise). The trustee will vote shares for which no instructions are received in the same proportion as shares for which instructions were received. A participant may also direct the trustee as to how to respond to a tender or exchange offer with respect to such securities. The Plan Administrator will notify each participant and distribute in a timely manner any information that will be distributed to shareholders in connection with any such tender or exchange offer. If the participant does not so direct the trustee, the participant will be considered to have given the trustee a direction not to sell, and such shares will not be tendered or exchanged. Any shares which are not subject to instructions will be tendered by the trustee only in the same proportion as the stock for which instructions to tender are received.
 
A participant’s instructions with respect to such voting, tender or similar rights shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed to the Employer, New Rockville Financial or to the Plan Administrator.
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN
 
Introduction to Your Plan
 
Under the Plan, benefits are provided to eligible employees of Rockville Bank, SBR Mortgage Company, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. and, effective January 18, 2010, Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc. (also known as Family Choice Mortgage). The Plan is for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees and their beneficiaries. The Plan first became effective January 1, 1992. It was last amended and restated in its entirety effective January 1, 2006, except as otherwise provided in the Plan. It has been amended by First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
 
Rockville Bank intends for the Plan to comply, in form and in operation, with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or “ERISA.” Rockville Bank may change the Plan from time to time in the future to ensure continued compliance


S-3


Table of Contents

with these laws. Rockville Bank may also amend the Plan from time to time in the future to add, modify, or eliminate certain features of the Plan, as it sees fit. Federal law provides you with various rights and protections as a participant of the Plan, which is governed by ERISA. However, the Pension Guaranty Corporation does not guarantee your benefits under the Plan. The Internal Revenue Service has issued a “determination letter” to your Employer approving this Plan as a “tax-qualified” retirement plan.
 
Your Plan is a profit sharing plan with a 401(k) feature. Under this type of plan, you may choose to reduce your compensation and have these amounts contributed to this Plan on your behalf. The purpose of this Plan is to reward eligible employees for long and loyal service by providing them with retirement benefits. Between now and your retirement, your Employer intends to make contributions for you and other eligible employees. When you retire, you will be eligible to receive the value of the amounts which have accumulated in your account.
 
The following is a summary of the Plan and does not contain all of the detailed information in the Plan. Rockville Bank qualifies the summary in this prospectus supplement in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Plan. Copies of the Plan are available to all employees by filing a request with the Plan administrator at Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 . You are urged to read carefully the full text of the Plan. For purposes of the following summary, references to “you” or “your” refer to participants in the Plan.
 
Administration of the Plan
 
General Plan Information
 
Rockville Bank 401(k) Plan is the name of your Plan. Your Employer has assigned Plan Number 002 to your Plan. Your Plan’s records are maintained on a twelve-month period of time, beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31. Certain valuations and distributions are made on the anniversary date of your Plan, which is December 31.
 
Employer Information
 
Your Employer’s name and address is Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074. Your Employer’s employer identification number is 06-0523930.
 
Employees of SBR Mortgage Company, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. and, effective January 18, 2010, Family Choice Mortgage, are also eligible to participate in the Plan. For purposes of this Summary, Rockville Bank, SBR Mortgage Company, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. and Family Choice Mortgage will be collectively referred to as the “Employer.”
 
Plan Administrator Information
 
The Plan Administrator is responsible for the day-to-day administration and operation of the Plan. For example, the Administrator maintains the Plan records, including your account information, provides you with the forms you need to complete for Plan participation and directs the payment of your account at the appropriate time. The Plan Administrator will also allow you to review the formal Plan document and certain other materials related to the Plan. If you have any questions about the Plan and your participation, you should contact the Plan Administrator.
 
The Plan Administrator has the complete power, in its sole discretion, to determine all questions arising in connection with the administration, interpretation, and application of the Plan (and any related documents and underlying policies). Any such determination by the Plan Administrator is conclusive and binding upon all persons.
 
The name, address and business telephone number of your Plan Administrator is HR Committee, Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074, (860) 291-3617.
 
The Plan Administrator may designate another person or persons to perform some duties of the Administrator. The HR Committee has designated H&H Retirement Services, Inc. as the Plan’s third party


S-4


Table of Contents

administrator/recordkeeper. Accordingly, H&H Retirement Services is responsible for much of the day-to-day administration of the Plan. Its contact information is: H&H Retirement Services, Inc., 65 LaSalle Road, West Hartford, Connecticut 06107, (860) 521-8400, (860) 521-3742 (fax).
 
Plan Trustee Information
 
There are two trustees for the Plan. The name and principal place of business of the Plan trustee for the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund is First Bankers Trust Services, Inc., 2321 Koch’s Lane, P.O. Box 3566, Quincy, IL 62305-3566. The name and principal place of business of the Plan trustee for the remaining funds under the Plan is Charles Schwab Trust Company, 101 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.
 
For purposes of this prospectus summary, the trustees will be referred to collectively as the “trustee.” Your Plan trustee has been designated to hold and invest Plan assets for the benefit of you and other Plan participants. The trust fund established by the Plan trustee will be the funding medium used for the accumulation of assets from which benefits will be distributed.
 
Service of Legal Process
 
The name and address of your Plan’s agent for service of legal process is HR Committee, Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT 06074. Service of legal process may also be made upon the trustee.
 
Participation in Your Plan
 
Before you become a member or a “participant” in the Plan, there are certain eligibility and participation rules which you must meet.
 
Eligibility Requirements
 
You will be eligible to participate in the Plan if you have completed at least 1,000 Hours of Service in a completed period of six (6) to twelve (12) consecutive calendar months and have attained age 21, but only employees hired on or after January 1, 2005 will be eligible to share in Employer matching contributions, which are described below.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective January 18, 2010, any eligible employee of Family Choice Mortgage who is compensated solely on a commission basis and who has attained age 21 will be eligible to participate in the Plan upon completing six (6) months of service.
 
You should review the section in this Summary entitled “Service Rules” for a further explanation of these eligibility requirements.
 
Leased employees, “non-benefits employees,” and “owner-employees” are not eligible to participate in the Plan. A “non-benefits employee” is an individual who has signed an employment agreement, independent contractor agreement, or other personal services contract with the Employer stating that he or she is not eligible to participate in the Plan or an individual that the Employer treats as an independent contractor, regardless of whether the individual is determined to be an employee by administrative, judicial or other decision. An “owner-employee” is any individual who is a sole proprietor or who is a partner owning more than ten percent (10%) of either the capital or interest of a partnership which adopted the Plan. Employees of employers that are affiliated with Rockville Bank are not eligible to participate in the Plan unless their employer has specifically adopted the Plan in writing.
 
Participation Requirements
 
Once you have satisfied the Plan’s eligibility requirements, your next step will be to actually become a member or a “participant” in the Plan. You will become a participant on a specified day of the Plan Year. This


S-5


Table of Contents

day is called the Effective Date of Participation. The Effective Date of Participation is the first day of the calendar quarter coinciding with or next following the date you satisfy the Plan’s eligibility requirements.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, employees of Family Choice Mortgage who satisfy the applicable eligibility requirements set forth above as of January 18, 2010, will become participants as of such date.
 
As of June 30, 2010, there were approximately 299 current and former employees with accounts under the Plan and 168 employees participating by making elective deferral contributions.
 
Contributions to Your Plan
 
Employer Contributions to the Plan
 
Each year, your Employer will contribute to your Plan the following amounts:
 
(i) The total amount of the salary reduction you elected to defer. Elective contributions may be made on a pre-tax basis, an after-tax basis (Roth contributions) or a combination of the two, as you specify. See the section entitled “Participant Elective Contributions” for more information.
 
(ii) An Employer non-discretionary contribution equal to three percent (3%) of your Compensation.
 
(iii) For employees hired on or after January 1, 2005, a discretionary matching contribution equal to a uniform percentage of the amount of the salary reduction the employee elected to defer, which percentage will be determined each year by the Employer. Effective January 1, 2010, the Employer may, in its discretion, determine a different percentage (or no percentage) to be applicable to the employees of Family Choice Mortgage.
 
If you are eligible for matching contributions, you must be actively employed on the last day of the Plan Year or complete more than 500 Hours of Service during the Plan Year prior to terminating employment in order to share in the matching contribution for the year.
 
Your Employer may also contribute an additional discretionary amount each year. You must be actively employed on the last day of the Plan Year or complete more than 500 Hours of Service during the Plan Year prior to terminating employment in order to share in any discretionary contribution.
 
Effective January 18, 2010, employees who are compensated solely on a commission basis will be eligible to share in matching contributions and discretionary contributions if they complete more than three (3) consecutive calendar months of service prior to terminating employment.
 
In determining your eligibility to share in matching or discretionary contributions for the year, there are special rules which apply if your employment terminates due to your Retirement (Early, Normal or Late), Total and Permanent Disability or death. In such cases, you will be eligible to share in any matching or discretionary contributions made by your Employer for the year without regard to whether you satisfied the requirements explained above.
 
With the exception of your salary reduction contributions, all Employer contributions may, at the Employer’s discretion, be made in cash or shares of stock.
 
Participant Elective Contributions
 
As a participant, you may elect to defer up to 50% of your compensation each year instead of receiving that amount in cash, but your total deferrals in any taxable year may not exceed a dollar limit which is set by law. These Elective Contributions may be made on a pre-tax basis, an after-tax basis (Roth contributions) or a combination of the two, as you specify. The limit for 2010 is $16,500. However, if you will attain age 50 before the end of the year, you may make an additional “catch-up” contribution to the Plan. For 2010, you may defer an additional $5,500 if you are age 50 or older. The dollar limits on deferrals and catch-up contributions will increase in future years. The minimum deferral allowed under the Plan is $12.00 per week.


S-6


Table of Contents

The amount you elect to defer will be deducted from your pay in accordance with a procedure established by your Employer and Administrator. The procedure will require that you enter into a written salary reduction agreement after you satisfy the Plan’s eligibility requirements. You will be asked to designate whether your elective contributions will be made on a pre-tax basis, an after-tax basis (Roth contributions) or a combination of the two. If you do not make a designation, your elective contributions will be made on a pre-tax basis ( i.e ., no portion will be Roth contributions). You will be permitted to modify your election during the Plan Year. However, changes to a salary reduction election are only permitted quarterly, prior to the first day of each calendar quarter. You are also permitted to revoke your election any time during the Plan Year.
 
The amount you elect to defer on a pre-tax basis, and any earnings on that amount, will not be subject to income tax until it is actually distributed to you. This money will, however, be subject to Social Security taxes at all times. You pay income tax currently on Roth contributions. Note, however, that the tax treatment of your Elective Contributions is irrevocable: pre-tax contributions cannot be reclassified as Roth contributions, and Roth contributions cannot be reclassified as pre-tax contributions.
 
You should also be aware that the annual dollar limit is an aggregate limit which applies to all deferrals you may make under the Plan or other cash or deferred arrangements (including tax-sheltered 403(b) annuity contracts, simplified employee pensions or other 401(k) plans in which you may be participating). Generally, if your total deferrals under all cash or deferred arrangements for a calendar year exceed the annual dollar limit, the excess must be included in your income for the year. For this reason, it is desirable to request in writing that these excess deferrals be returned to you. If you fail to request such a return, you may be taxed a second time when the excess deferral is ultimately distributed from the Plan.
 
You must decide which plan or arrangement you would like to have return the excess. If you decide that the excess should be distributed from this Plan, you should communicate this in writing to the Administrator no later than the March 1st following the close of the calendar year in which such excess deferrals were made. If the entire dollar limit is exceeded in this Plan or any other plan maintained by the Employer, you will be deemed to have notified the Administrator of the excess. The Administrator will then return the excess deferral and any earnings to you by April 15th. Unless you specify otherwise, distribution of any excess deferrals will be made first from your pre-tax Elective Contributions.
 
In the event you receive a hardship distribution from your deferrals to this Plan pursuant to your certification and agreement that certain conditions are satisfied or any other plan maintained by your Employer, you will not be allowed to make additional salary reductions for a period of six (6) months after you receive the distribution.
 
You will always be 100% vested in the amount you deferred. This means that you will always be entitled to the entire deferred amount. This money will, however, be affected by any investment gains or losses. If there is a gain, the balance in your account will increase. Of course, if there is a loss, the balance in your account will decrease. Your interest in this account cannot be forfeited for any reason.
 
Distributions from your deferred account are not permitted before age 59 1 / 2 EXCEPT in the event of:
 
(i) death;
 
(ii) disability;
 
(iii) termination of employment or retirement; or
 
(iv) reasons of proven financial hardship. See the section entitled “Hardship Distribution of Benefits” for more information.
 
Your Share of Employer Contributions
 
Your Employer will allocate the amount you elect to defer to an account maintained by the Trustee on your behalf. Your Employer will also allocate the three percent (3%) non-discretionary Employer contribution to the Plan on your behalf and, if you are eligible, your Employer will also allocate the matching contribution


S-7


Table of Contents

made to the Plan on your behalf. See the section in this entitled “Employer Contributions to the Plan” for more information.
 
Any discretionary contribution that the Employer makes will be “allocated” or divided among participants eligible to share in the contribution for the Plan Year. Your share of the contribution will depend upon how much compensation you received during the year and the compensation received by other eligible participants.
 
Your share of your Employer’s discretionary contribution is determined by the following fraction:
 
         
Employer’s
  X   Your Compensation
Discretionary Contribution
      Total Compensation of All
Participants Eligible to
Share
 
For example:   Suppose the Employer’s discretionary contribution for the Plan Year is $20,000. Employee A’s compensation for the Plan Year is $25,000. The total compensation of all participants eligible to share, including Employee A, is $250,000. Employee A’s share will be:
 
                 
        $25,000        
$20,000
  X  
  Or   $2,000
        $250,000        
 
In addition to the Employer’s contributions made to your account, your account will be charged or credited annually with a share of the net investment earnings, gains, losses and expenses of the trust fund. If you are not an active employee, your account will also be charged a pro rata share of the Plan’s administrative expenses. See the section at the end of this Summary entitled “PAYMENT OF PLAN EXPENSES” for a further explanation.
 
You should also be aware that the law imposes certain limits on how much money may be allocated to your account for a year. These limits are extremely complex but GENERALLY no more than the lesser of $49,000 (for 2010) or 100% of your compensation may be allocated to you (excluding earnings or losses) in any year. The Administrator will inform you if these limits have affected you.
 
Compensation
 
For the purposes of your Plan, compensation has a special meaning. Compensation is defined as your total compensation during a Plan Year that is subject to income tax and is reflected on your W-2 Form, but
 
  •  including your salary reduction contributions to any plan or arrangement maintained by your Employer ( e.g. , contributions to this Plan or to a cafeteria plan); and
 
  •  excluding distributions from a plan of deferred compensation, amounts realized from the exercise of a stock option, or attributable to any other equity award.
 
Your compensation will be recognized for benefit purposes for the entire Plan Year.
 
The Plan, by law, cannot recognize compensation in excess of $245,000 in 2010. This amount will be adjusted in future years for cost of living increases. For any short Plan Year, the adjusted limit will be prorated based upon the number of full months in the short Plan Year.
 
Transfers From Qualified Plans (Rollovers)
 
At the discretion of the Administrator, you may be permitted to deposit into your Plan distributions you have received, in cash or in kind, from other plans or IRAs. Such a deposit is called a “rollover” and may result in tax savings to you. Effective May 1, 2010, if you received a distribution from the Rockville Bank Employee Stock Option Plan during the six-year period after you have completed ten years of plan participation and have attained age 55 or that constitutes an “eligible rollover distribution” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code and the plans) then it may be directly transferred to this Plan (see the section titled “Treatment of Distributions From Your Plan,” below). You should consult qualified counsel to determine if a rollover is in your best interest.


S-8


Table of Contents

Your rollover will be placed in a separate account called a “participant’s rollover account.” Any Roth direct rollovers ( i.e ., a direct rollover of amounts from a designated Roth elective contributions account or designated Roth rollover contributions account under an eligible employer plan described in Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code) will be accounted for separately. The Administrator may establish rules for investment.
 
You will always be 100% vested in your “rollover account.” This means that you will always be entitled to all of your rollover contributions. Rollover contributions will be affected by any investment gains or losses. If there is a gain, the balance in your account will increase. Of course, if there is a loss from an investment, the balance in your account will decrease.
 
Directed Investments
 
To help build an investment portfolio that is right for you, the Plan lets you invest your savings among different investment funds designated from time to time by the Administrator. Such funds are described in separate documents (prospectuses) that will be provided to you.
 
Each of the funds has different investment objectives. The responsibility for choosing among the funds is yours. You should match your own needs to the opportunities offered by each fund. All investments involve a degree of risk and you may want to consult a financial advisor before making your investment decisions. Neither your Employer nor the Plan’s Administrator is authorized to give you investment advice.
 
The Plan is intended to constitute a plan described in Section 404(c) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2550-404c-1 and consequently the fiduciaries of the Plan may be relieved of liability for any losses incurred with respect to your account that are the direct and necessary result of investment instructions given by you. This means that as a participant or beneficiary, you have the opportunity to:
 
(i) give investment directions with respect to your account and obtain written confirmation of such directions;
 
(ii) obtain sufficient information to make informed decisions with respect to investment alternatives available under the Plan; and
 
(iii) choose from a broad range of investment alternatives (at least three) the manner in which all or a portion of your account is invested.
 
In addition to the information provided to you, you may, upon request to the Administrator, obtain any of the following information:
 
(a) a description of the annual operating expenses of each investment alternative that reduce the rate of return to you and the aggregate amount of such expenses expressed as a percentage of average net assets of the investment alternative;
 
(b) copies of any prospectuses, financial statements and reports and any other materials relating to the investment alternatives to the extent such information is provided to the Plan;
 
(c) a list of the assets comprising the portfolio of each investment alternative that constitute “plan assets” within the meaning of Department of Labor Regulations, the value of each such asset and, with respect to each such asset that is a fixed rate investment contract issued by a bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, the name of the issuer of the contract, the term of the contract and the rate of return of the contract;
 
(d) information concerning the value of shares or units in investment alternatives, as well as the past and current investment performance of each alternative, determined, net of expenses, on a reasonable and consistent basis; and
 
(e) information concerning the value of shares or units in investment alternatives held in your account;


S-9


Table of Contents

In directing your investments, you should remember that the amount of your benefits under the Plan will depend in part upon your choice of investments. If you choose investments that produce gains and other earnings, your benefits will tend to increase in value over time. Conversely, if you choose investments that produce losses, your benefits will tend to decrease in value over time. Losses can occur. To the extent investment advice services are offered in connection with the Plan, such services are only a tool to help you achieve your retirement goals, not a guarantee that you will. The forecasts offered by any advisor service are not guarantees of future results but are only reasonable estimates based upon information supplied by you. The forecasts derive from forward looking models of the economy and securities markets that may utilize such data as historical returns, historical correlations, expected growth rates and calculated risk premiums. Since past performance is not always an accurate predictor of the future, and reliance upon historical and current data necessarily involves inherent limitations, you should use any advisor service as only a tool in your retirement planning and not as a substitute for your own informed judgment.
 
You may invest the money in your account (in multiples of 1%) in one or more of the available investment funds; however, investments in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund will only be made in whole shares. You make your initial investment election when you enroll. All dividends and earnings from your investment in a fund are reinvested in that same fund.
 
Transaction fees related to investments, purchases and sales for each fund are charged against the fund’s assets. Some funds also charge redemption fees if you request more than one transfer in or out of the fund during a period specified by the fund. The charges are reflected in the total rate of return. In addition, all investment funds incur expenses from basic operations, including investment advisor’s fees, legal and accounting services, postage, printing, telephone service and other costs of running the fund. The total of these costs is known as the expense ratio, which is expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average net assets during the year. These expenses are paid from income earned by the investment fund. You will not see these expenses on your quarterly account statements because they are deducted from the investment fund’s earnings before returns are reported. The higher the expense ratio, the lower the earnings that come back to your account. You should read the prospectuses for the funds to obtain more specific information about fees charged by the funds and the funds’ expense ratios. Commissions and fees on transfers into and out of the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund will be charged to individual participants’ accounts.
 
The following is a description of each of the Plan’s investment funds and other investments:
 
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Large Value,” this fund seeks total return and invests primarily in value stocks of large-cap companies and in dividend-paying stocks. It may invest in convertible debt securities (including securities rated below investment-grade) and in real estate investment trusts for income.
 
American Funds Growth Fund of America A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Large Growth,” this fund seeks growth of capital and invests primarily in attractively valued common stocks of companies that appear to offer superior opportunities for growth of capital.
 
Columbia Acorn A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Mid-Cap Growth,” this fund seeks long term capital appreciation and normally invests a majority of its assets in small- and mid-sized U.S. companies, but also may invest a portion of its assets in foreign companies in developed and emerging markets.
 
Davis New York Venture R  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Large Blend,” this fund seeks long-term growth of capital and invests primarily in equity securities of large-cap U.S. companies believed to be undervalued.
 
American Funds Fundamental Investors A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Large Blend,” this fund seeks long-term growth of capital and income and invests primarily in common stocks or securities convertible into common stocks. The fund may also invest significantly in non-U.S. securities.
 
Frank Russell Life Points Equity Growth R2  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Large Blend,” this fund seeks to achieve high, long-term capital appreciation and is a broadly diversified “fund of funds,”


S-10


Table of Contents

investing in a combination of underlying Russell funds consisting of 100% stocks in both U.S. and non-U.S. markets.
 
Oppenheimer Main St. Small Cap N  — Categorized by Morningstar at “Small Blend,” this fund seeks capital appreciation and invests mainly in common stocks of small-capitalization U.S. companies based on fundamental analysis and quantitative models.
 
Alliance Bernstein Small-Mid Cap Value A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Mid-Cap Value,” this fund seeks long-term growth of capital and invests primarily in a diversified portfolio of equity securities of small- to mid-cap U.S. companies, generally representing 60 to 125 companies that are considered to be undervalued.
 
Frank Russell Life Points Conservative R2  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Conservative Allocation,” this fund seeks high current income and long-term capital appreciation and is a diversified “fund of funds,” investing in a combination of underlying Russell funds consisting of approximately 20% stocks and 80% bonds.
 
Frank Russell Life Points Moderate R2  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Conservative Allocation,” this fund seeks to provide moderate long-term capital appreciation and high current income and is a diversified “fund of funds,” investing in a combination of underlying Russell funds consisting of approximately 40% stocks and 60% bonds.
 
American Funds American Balanced A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Moderate Allocation,” this fund seeks conservation of capital, current income and long-term growth of capital and income and invests in a broad range of securities, including stocks and bonds. The fund also invests in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government.
 
Frank Russell Life Points Balanced R2  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Moderate Allocation,” this fund seeks above-average capital appreciation and a moderate level of current income and is a broadly diversified “fund of funds,” investing in a combination of underlying Russell funds consisting of approximately 60% stocks (U.S. and non-U.S.) and 40% bonds.
 
Frank Russell Life Points Growth R2  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Moderate Allocation,” this fund seeks to achieve high, long-term capital appreciation and low current income and is a broadly diversified “fund of funds,” investing in a combination of underlying Russell funds consisting of approximately 80% stocks (U.S. and non-U.S.) and 20% bonds.
 
Oppenheimer Global A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “World Stock,” this fund seeks capital appreciation and invests mainly in common stocks of U.S. and foreign companies and can invest without limit in foreign securities and can invest in any country, including countries with developed or emerging markets.
 
American Funds EuroPacific A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Foreign Large Blend,” this fund seeks long-term growth of capital and normally invests primarily in growth-oriented, equity-type securities of insurers located in Europe and the Pacific basin. The fund may also hold cash, money market instruments and fixed-income securities.
 
Columbia Intermediate Bond A  — Categorized by Morningstar as “Intermediate-Term Bond,” this fund seeks total return, consisting of current income and capital preservation and invests primarily in debt securities that, at the time of purchase, are rated in at least one of the three highest bond rating categories or are unrated securities determined to be of comparable equity.
 
Oppenheimer International Bond N  — Categorized by Morningstar as “World Bond,” this fund invests 40% or more of their assets in foreign bonds. Some world bond funds follow a conservative approach, favoring high-quality bonds from developed markets while others own some lower-quality bonds from developed or emerging markets.
 
Metropolitan Life Stable Value Fund  — This fund guarantees principal and credited interest. The rate of interest changes quarterly.


S-11


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund  — The Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund invests in the common stock of Rockville Financial, Inc., and will invest in the common stock of Rockville Financial New. Like any investment in stock, the value of investments in this fund can increase or decrease as the share price of Rockville Financial, Inc. stock changes. If you invest in this fund, you will have the voting rights with respect to the shares of stock attributable to your account balance. You will also be credited with any dividends declared based on your proportionate interest in the total value of the fund. Cash held in the fund will be placed in a money market account or equivalent investment pending investment in New Rockville Financial common stock.
 
An investment in any of the funds listed above is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. As with any mutual fund investment, there is always a risk that you may lose money on your investment in any of the funds listed above.
 
The following provides performance data with respect to the investment options available under the Plan:
 
Year-by-Year Total Returns
 
                         
    December 31
    2009   2008   2007
 
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
    17.01 %     (34.47 )%     9.99 %
American Funds Growth Fund of America A
    34.48 %     (39.07 )%     10.95 %
Columbia Acorn A
    39.26 %     (38.72 )%     7.39 %
Davis New York Venture R
    31.56 %     (40.23 )%     4.62 %
American Funds Fundamental Investors A
    33.36 %     (39.70 )%     13.55 %
Frank Russell Life Points Equity Growth R2
    30.76 %     (42.11 )%     7.39 %
Oppenheimer Main St. Small Cap N
    36.55 %     (38.41 )%     (1.86 )%
Alliance Bernstein Small-Mid Cap Value A
    41.81 %     (34.56 )%     2.32 %
Frank Russell Life Points Conservative R2
    20.02 %     (15.42 )%     5.41 %
Frank Russell Life Points Moderate R2
    24.01 %     (23.54 )%     6.47 %
American Funds American Balanced A
    21.08 %     (25.73 )%     6.60 %
Frank Russell Life Points Balanced R2
    26.65 %     (29.94 )%     6.72 %
Frank Russell Life Points Growth R2
    28.94 %     (36.14 )%     6.98 %
Oppenheimer Global A
    39.20 %     (41.03 )%     5.97 %
American Funds EuroPacific A
    39.10 %     (40.53 )%     18.96 %
Columbia Intermediate Bond A
    18.82 %     (6.03 )%     4.36 %
Oppenheimer International Bond N
    12.66 %     (1.26 )%     13.29  
Metropolitan Life Stable Value Fund(1)
    3.94 %     3.72 %     2.46 %
Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund
    (24.84 )%     14.51 %     (31.65 )%
 
 
(1) Performance results for the Metropolitan Life Stable Value Fund represent the actual net interest rate credited to Participant accounts.
 
You may change the investment of your existing account balances on a monthly basis by directing the transfer of a specified percentage (in multiples of 1%) of your Plan account balance from one investment fund to another. Existing account balance transfer requests are processed at 12:00 p.m. noon on the last Wednesday of each month. On a daily basis, you can change the manner in which your future contributions and future Employer non-discretionary, matching and discretionary contributions will be divided among the Plan’s investment funds.


S-12


Table of Contents

Although transfers among the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund and the other funds offered under the Plan will only be processed monthly as described above, contributions to the Plan including the amount of the salary reduction you elect to defer each payroll period will be invested on a biweekly basis.
 
As a participant in the Plan, you are entitled to receive quarterly statements reporting the value of your account, the value of each investment option in which your account is invested and your vested interest in your account.
 
Benefits Under Your Plan
 
Distribution of Benefits Upon Retirement or Termination of Employment
 
You are always entitled to 100% of your account balance. Payment of your benefits will, at your election, occur as soon as practicable following your retirement or termination of employment. You may elect to delay payment of your benefits until your Normal Retirement Age, which is age 65; however, if the value of your account is less than a certain dollar threshold, a distribution will automatically be made to you within a reasonable time after you terminate employment. (See the Section entitled “Benefit Payment Method.”) If you do not select an earlier date, as a rule, distribution of your account balance must be made or commence not later than April 1 of the year following the later of (a) the year in which you attain age 70 1 / 2 , or (b) the year in which your employment terminates. If you are a 5% owner of the Employer, payment of your benefits cannot be deferred past the April 1st following the end of the year in which you attain age 70 1 / 2 .
 
Note that pursuant to a change in the law, required minimum distributions ( i.e ., annual distributions of the minimum required amount to participants who have terminated employment and are at least 70 1 / 2 ) were suspended for 2009 and will resume for 2010.
 
Distribution of Benefits Upon Death
 
Your beneficiary will be entitled to a single lump-sum distribution of 100% of your account balance upon your death. For purposes of the preceding sentence, effective with respect to death occurring on or after January 1, 2007, a participant who dies while performing qualified military service will be treated as having resumed and then terminated employment with his or her employer on account of death.
 
You may elect to have life insurance purchased on your behalf by the Administrator with a portion of your Employer’s contribution. If you elect to have a life insurance policy purchased on your behalf with a portion of your Employer’s contribution made to your account, your account will be reduced by the amount of the premiums and credited with any policy dividends.
 
If you are married at the time of your death, your spouse will be the beneficiary of the death benefit, unless you otherwise elect in writing on a form to be furnished to you by the Administrator. IF YOU WISH TO DESIGNATE A BENEFICIARY OTHER THAN YOUR SPOUSE, HOWEVER, YOUR SPOUSE MUST IRREVOCABLY CONSENT TO WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO THE DEATH BENEFIT. YOUR SPOUSE’S CONSENT MUST BE IN WRITING, BE WITNESSED BY A NOTARY OR A PLAN REPRESENTATIVE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE SPECIFIC NONSPOUSE BENEFICIARY.
 
If, however, (i) your spouse has validly waived any right to the death benefit in the manner outlined above; (ii) your spouse cannot be located; (iii) you are not married at the time of your death; or (iv) you are legally separated or have been abandoned and have a court order to such effect (and there is no qualified domestic relations order that provides otherwise) (See the Section entitled “Domestic Relations Orders”), then your death benefit will be paid to the beneficiary of your own choosing in a single lump sum. You may designate the beneficiary on a form to be supplied to you by the Administrator. If you change your designation, your spouse must again consent to the change. If no valid beneficiary exists at the time of your death, the death benefit will be payable to your estate.
 
Minimum distributions of your death benefit must generally begin within one year of your death and must be paid over a period not extending beyond your beneficiary’s life expectancy. If your spouse is the beneficiary, the start of payments may be delayed until the year in which you would have attained age 70 1 / 2 .


S-13


Table of Contents

Since your spouse has certain rights in the death benefit, you should immediately report any change in your marital status to the Administrator.
 
Benefit Payment Method
 
At the time you are entitled to receive a distribution under the Plan, the Administrator will direct the trustee to pay your benefits to you in one lump sum cash payment or in property. Payment in a cash lump sum is the only form of distribution available under the Plan; however, if part of your Plan account balance is invested in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, you may elect to receive whole shares of common stock for that portion of the distribution.
 
If your benefit under the Plan does not exceed $1,000 (disregarding any amount in your rollover account), the Administrator will direct the trustee to distribute your benefit to you if the distribution occurs prior to your Normal Retirement Age.
 
If your benefit under the Plan exceeds $1,000 (disregarding any amount in your rollover account), you must give written consent before the distribution may be made.
 
In addition to the benefit payment mentioned above, there are rules which require that certain minimum distributions be made from the Plan. If you are a 5% owner, distributions are required to begin not later than the April 1st following the end of the year in which you reach age 70 1 / 2 . If you are not a 5% owner, distributions are required to begin not later than the later of the April 1st following the end of the year in which you reach age 70 1 / 2 or retire. You should see the Administrator if you feel you may be affected by these rules.
 
Pre-Retirement Distribution of Benefits
 
You may be entitled to receive a pre-retirement distribution of your account balance if you have reached the age of 59 1 / 2 . However, any distribution will reduce the value of the benefits you will receive at normal retirement. This distribution is made at your election.
 
Also, the law restricts any pre-retirement distribution from certain accounts which are maintained for you under the Plan before you reach age 59 1 / 2 . These accounts are generally the ones set up to receive your salary reduction contributions and other Employer contributions which are used to satisfy special rules for 401(k) plans. Ask your Administrator if you need more details.
 
Hardship Distribution of Benefits
 
The Administrator may direct the trustee to distribute up to 100% of your account balance attributable to your salary reduction election and your rollover account in the event of immediate and heavy financial need. This hardship distribution is not in addition to your other benefits and will therefore reduce the value of the benefits you will receive at normal retirement.
 
Withdrawal is deemed to be on account of an immediate and heavy financial need if the withdrawal is to be used for one of the following purposes:
 
(a) The payment of expenses for medical care (described in Section 213(d) of the Internal Revenue Code) previously incurred by you, your spouse, your dependent or your primary beneficiary under the Plan or necessary for you, your spouse, your dependent or your primary beneficiary under the Plan to obtain medical care;
 
(b) The costs directly related to the purchase of your principal residence (excluding mortgage payments);
 
(c) The payment of tuition, related educational fees, and room and board expenses for the next twelve (12) months of post-secondary education for you, your spouse, your dependent or your primary beneficiary under the Plan;


S-14


Table of Contents

(d) The payment necessary to prevent your eviction from your principal residence or foreclosure on the mortgage of your principal residence;
 
(e) The payment of burial or funeral expenses for your deceased parent, spouse, child, dependent or your primary beneficiary under the Plan; or
 
(f) The payment of certain expenses for the repair of damage to your principal residence.
 
A distribution will be made from your account, but only if you certify and agree that all of the following conditions are satisfied:
 
(a) The distribution is not in excess of the amount of your immediate and heavy financial need. The amount of your immediate and heavy financial need may include any amounts necessary to pay any federal, state, or local income taxes or penalties reasonably anticipated to result from the distribution;
 
(b) You have obtained all distributions, other than hardship distributions, and all nontaxable (at the time of the loan) loans currently available under all plans maintained by your Employer; and
 
(c) That your Elective Contributions (pre-tax and Roth) and employee contributions will be suspended for at least six (6) months after your receipt of the hardship distribution.
 
Any hardship distribution from your account balance attributable to your salary reduction election will be limited, as of the date of distribution, to your total salary reduction contributions, reduced by the amount of any previous distributions made to you from this account, and will not include earnings on your contributions. Ask your Administrator if you need further details.
 
Treatment of Distributions From Your Plan
 
You pay federal income tax currently on Roth contributions ( i.e ., Elective Contributions made on an after-tax basis) that your Employer makes to the Plan on your behalf. Earnings on Roth contributions to the Plan are not includable in your gross income (and therefore not subject to federal income tax) if they are paid out after a 5-taxable year period of participation and after you have reached age 59 1 / 2 , become disabled or died.
 
That said, whenever you receive a distribution of non-Roth contributions from your Plan, it will normally be subject to income taxes. You may, however, reduce, or defer entirely, the tax due on your distribution through use of one of the following methods:
 
(a) The rollover of all or a portion of the distribution to an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), another qualified employer plan, a “403(b)” tax deferred annuity or a “457” retirement plan, or, effective for distributions made from the Plan after December 31, 2006, a Roth IRA (collectively referred to as “other plans”). This will result in no tax being due until you begin withdrawing funds from the other plans. The rollover of the distribution, however, MUST be made within strict time frames (normally, within 60 days after you receive your distribution). Under certain circumstances all or a portion of a distribution (such as a hardship distribution from your salary reduction contributions) may not qualify for this rollover treatment. In addition, most distributions will be subject to mandatory federal income tax withholding at a rate of 20%. This will reduce the amount you actually receive. For this reason, if you wish to rollover all or a portion of your distribution amount, the direct transfer option described in paragraph (b) below would be the better choice.
 
(b) You may request for most distributions that a direct transfer of all or a portion of your distribution amount be made to other plans willing to accept the transfer. A direct transfer will result in no tax being due until you withdraw funds from the other plans. Like the rollover, under certain circumstances all or a portion of the amount to be distributed may not qualify for this direct transfer, e.g. , a distribution of less than $500 will not be eligible for a direct transfer. If you elect to actually receive the distribution rather than request a direct transfer, then in most cases 20% of the distribution amount will be withheld for federal income tax purposes.
 
(c) The election of favorable income tax treatment under the “ten-year averaging” or “capital gains” method of taxation, if you qualify.


S-15


Table of Contents

(d) If a distribution includes the common stock of Rockville Financial, Inc., the taxable amount of your distribution may be reduced by the amount of any net unrealized appreciation with respect to that common stock, i.e. , the excess of the value of such common stock at the time of the distribution over its cost to the Plan. Your tax basis in the common stock for purposes of computing gain or loss on its subsequent sale will be the value of the common stock at the time of distribution less the amount of net unrealized appreciation. Any gain on a subsequent sale or other taxable disposition of such common stock, to the extent of the amount of net unrealized appreciation at the time of distribution, will be considered long-term capital gain regardless of the holding period of such common stock. Any gain on a subsequent sale or other taxable disposition of the common stock in excess of the amount of net unrealized appreciation at the time of distribution will be considered either short-term capital gain or long-term capital gain depending upon the length of the holding period of the common stock. You may elect to include the amount of any net unrealized appreciation in the total taxable amount of your distribution to the extent allowed by the regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service.
 
With respect to paragraphs (a) and (b) above, a surviving spouse or a spouse or former spouse who is an alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order may also be considered distributees eligible to rollover or directly transfer distributions. In addition, effective January 1, 2007, a nonspouse beneficiary may make a direct transfer to a certain type of Individual Retirement Account known as an “inherited IRA.”
 
WHENEVER YOU RECEIVE A DISTRIBUTION, THE ADMINISTRATOR WILL DELIVER TO YOU A MORE DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THESE OPTIONS. HOWEVER, THE RULES WHICH DETERMINE WHETHER YOU QUALIFY FOR FAVORABLE TAX TREATMENT ARE VERY COMPLEX. YOU SHOULD CONSULT WITH QUALIFIED TAX COUNSEL BEFORE MAKING A CHOICE.
 
Loans
 
You can borrow money for any reason from your Plan account and pay your account back with interest through convenient payroll deductions. Initiating a loan is permitted only while you are actively employed by the Employer.
 
The maximum amount you can borrow is the lesser of:
 
  •  50% of your account balance; or
 
  •  $50,000 reduced by the excess, if any, of your highest outstanding balance of loans from the Plan during the one-year period prior to the date of the loan over your current outstanding balance of loans.
 
The minimum amount you can borrow is $1,000. A loan administration fee of $150 is payable at the time the loan is requested. There are two types of loans: general purpose loans and principal residence loans. You can only have one loan outstanding at any one time. All loans are secured by your account balances and by your promissory note.
 
Interest is fixed at the time the loan is granted at the three-year Certificate of Deposit rate then payable by Rockville Bank plus 1%.
 
A repayment schedule will be established when the loan is made. For principal residence loans, the maximum repayment period is 15 years. For any other loan, the maximum repayment period is five years. However, no loan period may extend beyond your normal retirement age of 65. (You must provide documentation of your principal residence purchase to qualify for the longer repayment period.)
 
Regardless of the type of loan, you can prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance at any time by certified check.
 
The amount you borrow is converted into a promissory note within your account balance. Your promissory note is accepted as an asset of the Plan in your account replacing each investment fund on a proportionate basis and the amount of your promissory note is reallocated to a separate loan account. As you repay the loan, the outstanding account balance on the note is reduced and your repayments (of both principal and interest) reinvested according to your investment elections at the time you repay the loan.


S-16


Table of Contents

Loan repayments are made through payroll deductions beginning as soon as administratively possible after the loan proceeds are mailed.
 
Retired or terminated participants must pay off the balance of the loan plus accrued interest within 45 days after the end of the payroll period in which they retire or terminate employment; otherwise, their loans will be in default and they will be deemed to have received a distribution equal to the unpaid balance of the loan plus accrued interest, if any, which will be reported on Form 1099-R in the year of the default. Any outstanding loan balance included in such a deemed distribution will be subject to income tax and a possible 10% penalty tax for premature distribution. The unpaid balance of the loan, plus accrued interest, if any, will be deducted from their account by the Plan Administrator as soon as they are eligible to receive a distribution of their before-tax contributions.
 
Repayment of your loan payments may be suspended during the time you are on qualified military leave. If you think you will be affected, please ask the Plan Administrator for details.
 
Domestic Relations Orders
 
As a general rule, your interest in your account may not be alienated. This means that your interest may not be sold, used as collateral for a loan, given away or otherwise transferred. In addition, your creditors may not attach, garnish or otherwise interfere with your account.
 
There are two exceptions, however, to this general rule. The Administrator may be required by law to recognize obligations you incur as a result of court ordered child support or alimony payments. The Administrator must honor a “qualified domestic relations order.” A “qualified domestic relations order” is defined as a decree or order issued by a court that obligates you to pay child support or alimony, or otherwise allocates a portion of your assets in the Plan to your spouse, former spouse, child or other dependent. If a qualified domestic relations order is received by the Administrator, all or a portion of your benefits may be used to satisfy the obligation and payment may be made immediately even if you are not then eligible to receive a distribution from the Plan. The Administrator will determine the validity of any domestic relations order received. You and your beneficiaries can obtain, without charge, a copy of the QUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDER PROCEDURE from the Administrator.
 
The second exception permits the Administrator to offset your benefits against an amount that you are ordered or required to pay the Plan as the result of a judgment, order or decree issued against you, or settlement you entered into. All or a portion of your benefits will be used to satisfy any such obligation to the Plan.
 
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
 
Benefits provided by your Plan are NOT insured by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 because the insurance provisions under ERISA are not applicable to profit sharing plans such as your Plan.
 
Location of Participant or Beneficiary Unknown
 
If, at your Normal Retirement Date, all or a portion of a distribution payable to you or your beneficiary remains unpaid because of the Administrator’s inability, after diligent efforts, to locate you or your beneficiary, the amount of the distribution will be treated as a forfeiture. In the event you or your beneficiary are located after the forfeited amount is reallocated, the benefit will be restored unadjusted for earnings or losses.
 
Restrictions on Resale of Stock
 
Participants in the Plan who are officers or directors of Rockville Bank or Rockville Financial, Inc. are required to adhere to the insider trading policies of Rockville Bank and Rockville Financial, Inc. with respect to their participation in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, as well as the re-sale of shares distributed to them from the Plan. For information concerning these policies and their application to the


S-17


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, please contact the Vice President Treasury Officer, Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT 06074, (860) 291-3600.
 
Executive officers and directors of Rockville Bank or Rockville Financial, Inc., as well as persons who hold 10% or more of the common stock of Rockville Financial, Inc., are subject to restrictions on transactions in the Plan under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Transfers into or out of the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund, as well as other so-called “discretionary transactions” in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund are immediately reportable on a “Form 4” that is filed with the SEC under Section 16. In addition, such discretionary transactions are subject to so-called “short swing” profits liability provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act if they can be matched with another purchase or sale by the participant within six months of the discretionary transaction. A discretionary transaction can be made exempt from short swing profits liability, however, if it is made by irrevocable election at least six months in advance. These provisions may restrict:
 
  •  The reallocation of existing account balances into or out of the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund.
 
  •  Volitional cash withdrawals from the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund.
 
  •  The resale of common stock of Rockville Financial, Inc. delivered from the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund to any such person.
 
For further information about these rules, please contact the VP Treasury Officer, Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT 06074, (860) 291-3600.
 
Routine investments in the Rockville Financial, Inc. Common Stock Fund by executive officers and directors of Rockville Bank or Rockville Financial, Inc. are not immediately reportable on a Form 4, but should be reported on the next Form 4 or Form 5 filed by the executive officer or director.
 
In addition, shares of Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock received by a person deemed an “affiliate” of Rockville Financial, Inc. under the Securities Act must be registered for resale by such person unless such resale complies with the provisions of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act.
 
The foregoing is not intended to be a complete statement of applicable law and any person to whom the foregoing may apply should obtain legal advice.
 
   Voting of Stock and Tender Rights
 
Each participant may instruct the Trustee as to the manner in which any shares of Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock held in any account designated to invest in securities of Rockville Financial, Inc. (or securities of an unrelated company that may be distributed with respect to the securities of Rockville Financial, Inc. by reason of a spin-off or otherwise). The trustee will vote shares for which no instructions are received in the same proportion as shares for which instructions were received. A participant may also direct the trustee as to how to respond to a tender or exchange offer with respect to such securities. The Plan Administrator will notify each participant and distribute in a timely manner any information that will be distributed to shareholders in connection with any such tender or exchange offer. If the participant does not so direct the trustee, the participant will be considered to have given the trustee a direction not to sell, and such shares will not be tendered or exchanged. Any shares which are not subject to instructions will be tendered by the trustee only in the same proportion as the stock for which instructions to tender are received.
 
A participant’s instructions with respect to such voting, tender or similar rights shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed to the Employer, Rockville Financial, Inc. or to the Plan Administrator.
 
Service Rules
 
Predecessor Employer
 
For the purposes of the Plan, your Hours of Service with First National Bank of New England or an affiliated employer will be recognized. In addition, effective January 18, 2010, hours of service credited under


S-18


Table of Contents

the 401(k) plan maintained (or formerly maintained) by Family Choice Mortgage will be treated as Hours of Service under this Plan.
 
Hour of Service
 
You will be credited with an Hour of Service for purposes of eligibility for participation for:
 
(a) each hour for which you are directly or indirectly compensated by your Employer for the performance of duties during the Plan Year;
 
(b) each hour for which you are directly or indirectly compensated by your Employer for reasons other than performance of duties (such as vacation, holidays, sickness, disability, lay-off, military duty, jury duty or leave of absence during the Plan Year); and
 
(c) each hour for back pay awarded or agreed to by your Employer.
 
You will not be credited for the same Hours of Service both under (a) or (b), as the case may be, and under (c).
 
1-Year Break in Service
 
A 1-Year Break in Service for purposes of eligibility for participation is a computation period during which you have not completed more than 500 Hours of Service with your Employer.
 
A 1-Year Break in Service does NOT occur, however, in the computation period in which you enter or leave the Plan for reasons of:
 
(a) an authorized leave of absence; or
 
(b) certain maternity or paternity absences.
 
The Administrator will be required to credit you with Hours of Service for a maternity or paternity absence. These are absences taken on account of pregnancy, birth, or adoption of your child. No more than 501 Hours of Service shall be credited for this purpose and these Hours of Service shall be credited solely to avoid your incurring a 1-Year Break in Service. The Administrator may require you to furnish proof that your absence qualifies as a maternity or paternity absence.
 
Special Rules for Certain Employees of Family Choice Mortgage
 
Effective January 18, 2010, an employee of Family Choice Mortgage who is compensated solely on a commission basis will be credited with service on an “elapsed time basis,” which means he or she will be credited with service for the period of time beginning on the first date such employee performs an hour of service and ending on such employee’s “severance date,” as defined in the Plan document.
 
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
 
If you are a veteran and are reemployed under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, your qualified military service may be considered service with the Employer. Effective January 1, 2009, an individual is treated as having severed employment during any period such individual is performing in the uniformed services. If an individual elects to receive a distribution by reason of severance from employment, death or disability, the individual may not make pre-tax or Roth contributions during the six-month period beginning on the date of the distribution.
 
If you may be affected by this law, ask your Administrator for further details.


S-19


Table of Contents

 
Your Plan’s Top Heavy Rules
 
Explanation of “Top Heavy Rules”
 
A 401(k) plan that primarily benefits “key employees” is called a “top heavy plan.” Key employees are certain owners or officers of your Employer. A Plan is a “top heavy plan” when more than 60% of the contributions or benefits have been allocated to key employees.
 
Each year, the Administrator is responsible for determining whether your Plan is a “top heavy plan.” If your Plan becomes top heavy in any Plan Year, then non-key employees will be entitled to certain “top heavy minimum benefits,” and other special rules will apply. Among these top heavy rules are the following:
 
(a) Your Employer may be required to make a contribution to your account in order to provide you with at least “top heavy minimum benefits.”
 
(b) If you are a participant in more than one plan, you may not, however, be entitled to “top heavy minimum benefits” under all plans.
 
Claims by Participants and Beneficiaries
 
If you believe you are entitled to a benefit that has not been paid, you should notify the Plan Administrator of all relevant facts about your claim. The Plan Administrator will notify you of the status of your claim within 90 days of receiving your claim. If more than the 90 days is needed to process the claim, the Plan Administrator will notify you in writing of the special circumstances requiring the extension and of the date a decision is expected to be made. An extension will not be more than 180 days from the receipt of the claim.
 
Denial of Claim
 
If your claim for benefits is denied, you will receive a written notice from the Plan Administrator with the following information:
 
(a) the specific reason or reasons for the denial;
 
(b) reference to the specific Plan provisions on which the determination is based;
 
(c) a description of any additional material or information you must submit to have the claim reconsidered and why such additional information is required; and
 
(d) appropriate information as to the steps you must take if you wish to appeal the decision and an explanation of your right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of ERISA if your claim is denied on review.
 
Review of Denied Claims and Decision
 
If your claim for benefits is denied, in whole or in part, you or your authorized representative have the right to appeal the decision. You must appeal a denied claim in accordance with these procedures before you are permitted to bring a civil action for benefits. The appeal must be submitted in writing and filed with the Administrator within 60 days after your claim was denied.
 
The Administrator will conduct a full and fair review of the denial of your claim that takes into account all comments, documents, records and other information submitted by you or your authorized representative relating to your claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination.
 
When the review has been completed you will be notified in writing of the final decision. As part of the review, you or your authorized representative also have the right to request (free of charge) reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to your claim for benefits. Such notice will state the specific reasons for the decision and will include specific references to the pertinent Plan provisions upon which the decision was based. The final decision will also describe your right to bring a civil


S-20


Table of Contents

action under Section 502(a) of ERISA and your right to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to your claim for benefits. A document is relevant to your claim for benefits if it was relied upon in making the determination, or demonstrates that benefit determinations are made in accordance with the Plan and that Plan provisions have been applied consistently with respect to similarly situated claimants. The decision will be furnished to you no later than 60 days after the receipt of your request for a review, unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing. In this case, the Administrator will notify you in writing of the special circumstances requiring the extension and of the date a decision is expected to be made. An extension will not be more than 120 days from the receipt of your appeal.
 
You may not bring a lawsuit on a claim for benefits unless you have exhausted the claim and appeal procedures described above. Any lawsuit must be brought within 3 years after the date of the final disposition of the claim under these procedures.
 
Statement of ERISA Rights
 
ERISA provides that all Plan participants shall be entitled to:
 
Examine, without charge, at the Plan Administrator’s office and at other specified work site locations, all Plan documents, including insurance contracts, and copies of the latest annual report (Form 5500 Series) filed on behalf of the Plan with the U.S. Department of Labor and available at the Public Disclosure Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration.
 
Obtain copies of all Plan documents and other Plan information, including insurance contracts, and copies of the latest annual report (Form 5500 Series) and updated summary plan description, upon written request to the Plan Administrator. The administrator may make a reasonable charge for the copies.
 
Receive a summary of the Plan’s annual financial report. The Plan Administrator is required by law to furnish each participant with a copy of this summary annual report.
 
Receive quarterly statements reporting the value of your account, the value of each investment option in which your account is invested and your vested interest in your account. The Plan Administrator is required by law to furnish these statements to you.
 
In addition to creating rights for Plan participants, ERISA imposes duties upon the people who are responsible for the operation of the Plan.
 
The people who operate the Plan, called “fiduciaries” of the Plan, have a duty to do so prudently and in the interest of you and other Plan participants and beneficiaries. No one, including your Employer, or any other person, may fire you or otherwise discriminate against you in any way to prevent you from obtaining a benefit or exercising your rights under ERISA.
 
If your claim for a benefit is denied in whole or in part, you must receive a written explanation of the reason for the denial. You have the right to have your claim reviewed and reconsidered.
 
Under ERISA, there are steps you can take to enforce the above rights. For instance, if you request materials from the Plan Administrator and do not receive them within 30 days, you may file suit in a federal court. In such a case, the court may require the Plan Administrator to provide the materials and pay you up to $110 a day until you receive the materials, unless the materials were not sent because of reasons beyond the control of the administrator. If you have a claim for benefits which is denied or ignored, in whole or in part, you may file suit in a state or federal court. In addition, if you disagree with the Plan’s decision or lack thereof concerning the qualified status of a domestic relations order, you may file suit in federal court. If it should happen that Plan fiduciaries misuse the Plan’s money, or if you are discriminated against for asserting your rights, you may seek assistance from the U.S. Department of Labor, or you may file suit in a federal court. The court will decide who should pay court costs and legal fees. If you are successful, the court may order the person you have sued to pay these costs and fees. If you lose, the court may order you to pay these costs and fees (for example, if it finds that your claim is frivolous).


S-21


Table of Contents

If you have any questions about the Plan, you should contact the Plan Administrator. If you have any questions about this statement or about your rights under ERISA, or if you need assistance in obtaining documents from the Plan Administrator, you should contact the nearest office of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. You may also obtain certain publications about your rights and responsibilities under ERISA by calling the publications hotline of the Employee Benefits Security Administration.
 
Amendment and Termination of Your Plan
 
Amendment
 
Your Employer has the right to amend your Plan at any time. In no event, however, will any amendment:
 
(a) authorize or permit any part of the Plan assets to be used for purposes other than the exclusive benefit of participants or their beneficiaries; or
 
(b) cause any reduction in the amount credited to your account.
 
Termination
 
Your Employer has the right to terminate the Plan at any time. Upon termination, all amounts credited to your accounts will become 100% vested. Your Employer will direct the distribution of your accounts as soon as practicable, in a lump sum.
 
Payment of Plan Expenses
 
The expenses of administering the Plan may be paid out of the Trust unless paid by the Employer. The accounts of former employees who do not elect to take a distribution when they terminate employment, “alternate payees” who are entitled to a distribution from a participant’s account pursuant to a “qualified domestic relations order” and beneficiaries of deceased participants will be charged a pro rata share of the Plan’s reasonable administrative expenses even if such expenses are not charged to the accounts of active employees.
 
LEGAL OPINION
 
The validity of the issuance of New Rockville Financial Common Stock has been passed upon by Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, Hartford, Connecticut, which firm acted as counsel to Rockville Bank and New Rockville Financial, Inc. in connection with New Rockville Financial’s stock offering.


S-22


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS
 
(ROCKVILLE BANK LOGO)
 
(Proposed Holding Company for Rockville Bank)
Up to 14,950,000 Shares of Common Stock
(Subject to increase to up to 17,192,500 shares)
 
$10.00 per Share
 
Rockville Financial New, Inc., a newly formed Connecticut stock corporation (“New Rockville Financial”), is offering for sale up to 14,950,000 shares of common stock in connection with the “second-step” conversion of Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. from the mutual holding company form of organization to the stock holding company form of organization. The shares of common stock we are offering represents the ownership interest in Rockville Financial, Inc. (“Existing Rockville Financial”), a Connecticut stock corporation, now owned by Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. The remaining ownership interest in Existing Rockville Financial common stock is currently held by the general public and will be exchanged for shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in connection with the conversion. Existing Rockville Financial currently owns 100.0% of the capital stock of Rockville Bank, a Connecticut-chartered stock savings bank. Upon the completion of the conversion, both Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. will cease to exist and Rockville Bank will be wholly-owned by New Rockville Financial. Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RCKB” and we expect that shares of New Rockville Financial common stock will trade under the symbol “RCKBD” for a period of 20 trading days after the completion of the offering. Thereafter, New Rockville Financial’s trading symbol will revert to “RCKB”. In addition, New Rockville Financial’s name will be changed to “Rockville Financial, Inc.” upon the completion of the conversion and the offering.
 
We are offering for sale up to 14,950,000 shares of common stock on a best efforts basis. In the event of a greater demand for shares of our common stock or a change in financial or market conditions, with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval, we may sell up to 17,192,500 shares without giving you further notice or providing you with the opportunity to change or cancel your order. We must sell a minimum of 11,050,000 shares in the offering in order to complete the conversion and the offering.
 
We are offering shares of our common stock in a subscription offering to eligible depositors and our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans. Shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering will be offered for sale to the general public in a community offering, with a preference given first to natural persons residing in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut, then to the existing shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial and then to all other natural persons residing in Connecticut. We also may offer for sale shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering or community offering in a syndicated community offering through a syndicate of selected dealers. New Rockville Financial also intends to contribute 3.0% of the net proceeds from the offering to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc, a charitable foundation.
 
In addition to the shares of common stock we are selling, the remaining interest in Existing Rockville Financial currently held by the public will be exchanged for shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial using an exchange ratio so that the existing public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will own 41.81% of New Rockville Financial common stock after the conversion, without giving effect to cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares or shares that they may purchase in the offering. We will issue up to 10,741,700 shares of common stock in the exchange, which may be increased to up to 12,352,955 shares if we sell 17,192,500 shares of common stock in the offering.


Table of Contents

 
The minimum number of shares you may order is 25 shares. The offering is expected to expire at 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], but we may extend this expiration date without notice to you until [Date 2] or longer if the Connecticut Banking Commissioner approves a later date. Once submitted, orders are irrevocable unless the offering is terminated or is extended beyond [Date 2], or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to less than 11,050,000 shares, in which event we will resolicit subscribers, and you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order. If you do not provide us with a written indication of your intent, your funds will be returned to you, with interest. Funds received prior to the completion of the offering will be held in a segregated account at Rockville Bank. All subscriptions received will bear interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, which is currently     % per annum.
 
OFFERING SUMMARY
Price: $10.00 per Share
 
                                 
    Minimum     Midpoint     Maximum     Adjusted Maximum  
 
Number of shares:
    11,050,000       13,000,000       14,950,000       17,192,500  
Gross offering proceeds:
  $ 110,500,000     $ 130,000,000     $ 149,500,000     $ 171,925,000  
Estimated offering expenses, excluding selling agent fees:
  $ 1,748,870     $ 1,748,870     $ 1,748,870     $ 1,748,870  
Selling agent fees(1):
  $ 4,095,125     $ 4,791,275     $ 5,487,425     $ 6,287,998  
Estimated net proceeds:
  $ 104,656,005     $ 123,460,855     $ 142,263,705     $ 163,888,133  
Estimated net proceeds per share:
  $ 9.47     $ 9.50     $ 9.52     $ 9.53  
 
 
(1) Includes: (i) a management fee payable by us to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. of $30,000; (ii) fees payable by us to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. in connection with the subscription and community offerings equal to 0.75% of the aggregate amount of common stock sold in the subscription and community offerings (net of insider purchases and shares purchased by our employee stock ownership plan and other tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans); and (iii) a fee payable by us of 5.5% of the aggregate dollar amount of common stock sold in the syndicated community offering to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., which will be allocated to dealers in accordance with the actual number of shares of common stock sold by such dealers, assuming that 40.0% of the shares are sold in the subscription and community offerings and the remaining 60.0% of the shares are sold in the syndicated community offering. See “PRO FORMA DATA” and “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Marketing Arrangements”.
 
THESE SECURITIES ARE NOT BANK DEPOSITS AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, NOR ARE THEY OBLIGATIONS OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, A BANK.
 
THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF PRINCIPAL. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE SECTION ENTITLED “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 20 OF THIS PROSPECTUS.
 
NEITHER THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD, THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY BODY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
 
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
 
For assistance, please contact the Stock Information Center at (877)           -          .
 
The date of this prospectus is          , 2010.


Table of Contents

 


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
    1  
    20  
    28  
    31  
    32  
    33  
    34  
    36  
    37  
    39  
    39  
    46  
    70  
    70  
    98  
    106  
    108  
    116  
    132  
    134  
    135  
    156  
    159  
    162  
    165  
    166  
    166  
    167  
    167  
    F-1  
  EX-1.1
  EX-2.1
  EX-3.1
  EX-3.1.1
  EX-3.2
  EX-5.1
  EX-10.8
  EX-10.10
  EX-21.1
  EX-23.2
  EX-23.3
  EX-23.4
  EX-99.1
  EX-99.2
  EX-99.3


Table of Contents

 
SUMMARY
 
The following summary explains the significant aspects of the conversion and reorganization and the related offering. It may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For additional information and before making an investment decision, you should read this entire document carefully, including the CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS and the section entitled “RISK FACTORS” .
 
The Companies
 
New Rockville Financial
 
Rockville Financial New, Inc., referred to in this prospectus as New Rockville Financial, is a newly formed Connecticut stock corporation that will own all of the outstanding common stock of Rockville Bank upon completion of the conversion and the offering. New Rockville Financial will be the successor to Existing Rockville Financial. It will be regulated by the State of Connecticut Department of Banking (the “Connecticut Department of Banking”) and the Federal Reserve Board. New Rockville Financial will change its name to Rockville Financial, Inc. upon completion of the conversion and the offering.
 
Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
 
Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. (“Rockville Financial MHC”) is the Connecticut-chartered mutual holding company of Existing Rockville Financial. Rockville Financial MHC is regulated by the Connecticut Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board. Rockville Financial MHC’s principal business activity is the ownership of 10,689,250 shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial, or 56.7% of the issued and outstanding shares as of the date of this prospectus. Upon completion of the conversion and offering, Rockville Financial MHC will cease to exist.
 
Existing Rockville Financial
 
Rockville Financial, Inc., referred to in this prospectus as Existing Rockville Financial, is a Connecticut stock corporation that currently owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Rockville Bank, a Connecticut-chartered stock savings bank. It is regulated by the Connecticut Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board. At June 30, 2010, Existing Rockville Financial had consolidated assets of $1.60 billion, deposits of $1.15 billion and stockholders’ equity of $162.4 million. As of June 30, 2010, Existing Rockville Financial had 18,853,112 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, excluding shares held in treasury, of which 56.7% was owned by Rockville Financial MHC and the remaining 43.3% was owned by public shareholders. After the completion of the conversion and offering, Existing Rockville Financial will cease to exist, and will be succeeded by New Rockville Financial.
 
Rockville Bank
 
Rockville Bank is a state-chartered stock savings bank organized in Connecticut in 1858 that provides a full range of banking services to consumer and commercial customers primarily located in the north-central part of Connecticut. Rockville Bank is regulated by the Connecticut Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Rockville Bank’s deposits are insured to the maximum allowable under the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the FDIC. Rockville Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”).
 
Our executive offices are located at 25 Park Street, Rockville, Connecticut 06066. Our telephone number at this address is (860) 291-3600 and our website address is www.rockvillebank.com. Information on this website is not and should not be considered to be a part of this prospectus.
 
Our Business
 
We provide a full range of banking services to consumer and commercial customers through our main office in Rockville, Connecticut, 20 1 / 2 other branches located in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut and 42 ATMs, including 13 stand-alone ATM facilities. The “1/2” branch refers to an “in


1


Table of Contents

school” branch located at South Windsor High School in South Windsor, Connecticut, which serves only the school’s students, faculty and administrative staff and is not open to the general public.
 
We strive to remain a leader in meeting the financial service needs of our local community and to provide quality service to the individuals, families, professionals and businesses in the market areas we serve. We are a community-oriented provider of traditional banking products and services to business organizations and individuals, offering products such as residential mortgage, commercial real estate, commercial business and consumer loans and a variety of deposit products.
 
We employed 216 full-time equivalent employees as of June 30, 2010. Existing Rockville Financial does not currently own or lease any property but instead uses the premises, equipment and furniture of Rockville Bank.
 
SEE “BUSINESS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND ROCKVILLE BANK” for a more detailed discussion of our business.
 
Our Business Strategy
 
Our goal is to continue to operate and grow as a well capitalized, profitable and competitive financial institution. We seek to accomplish this goal by:
 
  •  remaining an independent community-oriented institution;
 
  •  continuing our emphasis on one-to four family residential real estate lending;
 
  •  continuing our emphasis on commercial real estate lending;
 
  •  increasing our emphasis on commercial business lending;
 
  •  expanding our banking franchise; and
 
  •  growing our deposit base.
 
See “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Our Business Strategy” for a more detailed discussion of our business strategy.
 
Our Market Area
 
We operate in a primarily suburban market area that has a stable population and household base. All of our current offices are located in Connecticut in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties. Our primary market area is located in the north-central part of Connecticut including, in part, the eastern portion of the greater Hartford metropolitan area. Our main office is located in Rockville and is located approximately 15 miles from Hartford. Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties have a mix of industry groups and employment sectors, including services, wholesale and retail trade and manufacturing as the basis of the local economy. Our primary market area for deposits includes the communities in which we maintain our banking office locations. Our primary lending area is broader than our primary deposit market area and includes all of Connecticut’s Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties, and parts of the adjacent Windham and Middlesex Counties.
 
Description of the Conversion
 
In 2005, Rockville Financial MHC and Existing Rockville Financial reorganized into the mutual two-tier holding company form of organization. In connection with this reorganization, Existing Rockville Financial sold 45% of its shares of common stock to the public, including depositors of Rockville Bank, the Rockville Bank employee stock ownership plan and Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. Existing Rockville Financial issued the remaining 55% of its common stock to Rockville Financial MHC, our mutual holding company.
 
Pursuant to the terms of our plan of conversion and reorganization, which is referred to in this prospectus as the plan of conversion, Rockville Financial MHC will convert from a partially public mutual holding


2


Table of Contents

company structure to a fully public stock holding company structure. As part of the conversion, we are offering for sale the ownership interest in Existing Rockville Financial that is currently held by Rockville Financial MHC. In addition, the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in exchange for their existing shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial pursuant to an exchange ratio, adjusted as required by regulatory authorities. See “IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY STOCK OWNERSHIP.” We also plan to contribute cash equal to 3.0% of the net proceeds from the offering to the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc.
 
The following diagram shows our current organizational structure, which is commonly referred to as the “two-tier” mutual holding company structure:
 
(STRUCTURE CHART)
 
After the conversion and offering are completed, we will be organized as a fully public stock holding company, as follows:
 
(STRUCTURE CHART)
 
Upon the completion of the conversion and offering, both Rockville Financial MHC and Existing Rockville Financial will cease to exist, and Rockville Bank will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Rockville Financial. Please see “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING” for a more detailed discussion of the terms of the conversion.


3


Table of Contents

Reasons for the Conversion
 
The purpose of converting to the fully public stock form of ownership and conducting the offering at this time is to provide us with additional capital to support our continued planned growth, to take advantage of potential growth and strategic opportunities, and to successfully implement our business strategies. In addition, the conversion is a necessary and appropriate response to the changing market and regulatory conditions and will allow us to continue to compete effectively in the changing financial services marketplace. The conversion and offering also provides our employees and customers with the opportunity to share in our success through the ownership of our stock, and our shareholders will benefit from the more active and liquid trading market that will exist when Rockville Bank’s holding company is 100.0% publicly owned. For more information regarding the reasons for the conversion see “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Reasons for the Conversion”.
 
Terms of the Offering
 
We are first offering shares of our common stock in a subscription offering to eligible depositors and our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans. Shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering will be offered for sale to the general public in a community offering, with a preference given first to natural persons residing in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut, then to the existing shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial and then to all other natural persons residing in Connecticut. We also may offer for sale shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering or community offering in a syndicated community offering to be managed by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
 
We are offering for sale up to 14,950,000 shares of common stock on a best efforts basis. All shares of common stock are being offered for sale at a price of $10.00 per share. All investors will pay the same purchase price per share and will not be charged a commission to purchase shares of common stock in the offering. The amount of capital being raised is based on an independent appraisal of New Rockville Financial. In the event of a greater demand for shares of our common stock or a change in financial or market conditions, with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval, we may sell up to 17,192,500 shares without giving you further notice or providing you with the opportunity to change or cancel your order.
 
The offering is expected to expire at 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], but we may extend this expiration date without notice to you until [Date 2] or longer if the Connecticut Banking Commissioner approves a later date. Once submitted, orders are irrevocable unless the offering is terminated or is extended beyond [Date 2], or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to less than 11,050,000 shares. In the event the offering is extended beyond [Date 2] or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to less than 11,050,000 shares, we will resolicit subscribers, and you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order. If you do not provide us with a written indication of your intent, your funds will be returned to you, with interest. Funds received prior to the completion of the offering will be held in a segregated account at Rockville Bank. All subscriptions received will bear interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, which is currently     % per annum.
 
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., our marketing advisor and sales agent in the offering, will use its best efforts to assist us in selling shares of our common stock. However, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. is not obligated to purchase any shares of common stock in the offering.


4


Table of Contents

How We Intend to Use the Proceeds From the Offering
 
The following table summarizes how we will use the proceeds of the offering, based on the sale of shares at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum of the offering range, assuming that 40.0% of the shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60.0% of the shares will be sold in a syndicated community offering.
 
                                 
                      Adjusted
 
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Maximum
 
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    Shares at
    Shares at
    Shares at
    Shares at
 
    $10.00
    $10.00
    $10.00
    $10.00
 
    per Share     per Share     per Share     per Share  
    (In thousands)  
 
Gross offering proceeds
  $ 110,500     $ 130,000     $ 149,500     $ 171,925  
Less: offering expenses
    5,844       6,540       7,236       8,037  
                                 
Net offering proceeds
    104,656       123,460       142,264       163,888  
Distribution of net proceeds:
                               
Proceeds contributed to Rockville Bank
    52,328       61,730       71,132       81,944  
Loan to employee stock ownership plan
    4,420       5,200       5,980       6,877  
Proceeds contributed to foundation
    3,140       3,704       4,268       4,917  
                                 
Proceeds retained by New Rockville Financial
  $ 44,768     $ 52,826     $ 60,884     $ 70,150  
                                 
 
Initially, we intend to invest the proceeds retained in the offering by New Rockville Financial in short-term liquid investments, such as U.S. treasury and government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and cash and cash equivalents. In the future, New Rockville Financial may use the funds for general corporate purposes, including, among other things, paying cash dividends to shareholders, repurchasing shares of its common stock, contributing additional capital to Rockville Bank and financing strategic growth opportunities, such as the acquisition of other financial institutions or related banking businesses. Rockville Bank will also initially invest the proceeds contributed to it by New Rockville Financial in short-term liquid investments. Rockville Bank also plans to pay off certain Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaling $32.3 million that are scheduled to mature between January 2011 and August 2011. In the future, the funds may be used by Rockville Bank to fund new loans and deposit generation, invest in securities, hire additional personnel to support growth, including new lending personnel, and finance capital improvements and strategic growth opportunities, such as branch expansion and bank and branch acquisitions. We have no agreements or understandings with respect to any expansion or acquisitions at this time.
 
Please see the section of this prospectus entitled “HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING” for more information on the proposed use of the proceeds from the offering.
 
How We Determined the Offering Range and the $10.00 Per Share Stock Price
 
The amount of common stock we are offering is based on an independent appraisal of the estimated market value of New Rockville Financial, assuming the conversion and offering are completed. RP Financial, LC. (“RP Financial”), our independent appraiser, has estimated that as of August 26, 2010, our market value ranged from $189.9 million to $295.45 million, with a midpoint of $223.41 million. Based on this valuation, the $10.00 per share price and the 58.2% pro forma ownership interest of Rockville Financial MHC being sold in the offering, the number of shares of common stock being offered for sale by New Rockville Financial will range from 11,050,000 shares to 14,950,000 shares. The $10.00 per share price was determined by us, taking into account, among other factors, the market price of our stock before we adopted the plan of conversion, the requirement under Connecticut regulations that the common stock be offered in a manner to promote widespread distribution of the stock, and desired liquidity in our common stock after the offering. In addition, the $10.00 per share price was selected because it is the price most commonly used in mutual-to-stock conversions of financial institutions.


5


Table of Contents

The exchange ratio will range from 0.9725 at the minimum of the offering range to 1.3158 at the maximum of the offering range, and has been designed to preserve the existing percentage of ownership held by the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial, adjusted for the assets held by Rockville Financial MHC, which results in a 41.81% ownership interest (excluding any additional shares purchased by shareholders in the offering and their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares). If a greater demand for shares of our common stock or a change in financial or market conditions warrant, the offering range may be increased by 15.0%, which would result in an offering range from 11,050,000 shares to 17,192,500 shares and an exchange ratio of 1.5131 at the adjusted maximum of the offering range. The independent appraisal will be updated prior to the completion of the conversion and offering. If the appraised value changes to either below $189.9 million or above $295.5 million, we will resolicit persons who submitted stock orders and you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order.
 
In preparing its appraisal, RP Financial considered the information in this prospectus, including our financial statements. RP Financial also considered the following factors, among others:
 
  •  our historical, present and projected operating results and financial condition;
 
  •  the economic, demographic and competition characteristics of our market area;
 
  •  a comparative evaluation of our operating and financial statistics with those of other similarly-situated, publicly-traded savings and thrift holding companies;
 
  •  the effect of the capital raised in this offering on our net worth and earnings potential; and
 
  •  the trading market for our securities and comparable institutions and general economic conditions in the market for such securities.
 
The appraisal was based in part on Existing Rockville Financial’s analysis of a peer group of 13 publicly traded savings bank and thrift holding companies that RP Financial considers comparable to Existing Rockville Financial, as listed below. The total assets of our peer group are presented as of June 30, 2010.
 
                         
                Operating
  Total
Ticker
 
Financial Institution
 
Exchange
 
Primary Market
  Strategy   Assets
                    (In thousands)
 
PBNY
  Provident New York Bancorp, Inc. of NY   NASDAQ   Montebello, NY   Thrift   $ 2,964  
BRKL
  Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   Brookline, MA   Thrift     2,660  
DNBK
  Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   Danvers, MA   Thrift     2,529  
OCFC
  OceanFirst Financial Corp of NJ   NASDAQ   Toms River, NJ   Thrift     2,220  
ESBF
  ESB Financial Corp. of PA   NASDAQ   Ellwood City, PA   Thrift     1,948  
UBNK
  United Financial Bancorp, Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   W. Springfield, MA   Thrift     1,545  
WFD
  Westfield Financial Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   Westfield, MA   Thrift     1,235  
BFED
  Beacon Federal Bancorp Inc. of NY   NASDAQ   East Syracuse, NY   Thrift     1,072  
ESSA
  ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA   NASDAQ   Stroudsburg, PA   Thrift     1,067  
NHTB
  New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares Inc. of NH   NASDAQ   Newport, NH   Thrift     993  
HIFS
  Hingham Institution for Savings of MA   NASDAQ   Hingham, NH   Thrift     972  
HARL
  Harleysville Savings Financial Corp. of PA   NASDAQ   Harleysville, PA   Thrift     867  
THRD
  TF Financial Corp. of PA   NASDAQ   Newtown, PA   Thrift     721  
 
The following are average financial ratios for the peer group companies:
 
  •  average assets of $1.6 billion;
 
  •  average non-performing assets of 0.96% of total assets;
 
  •  average loans of 64.5% of total assets;


6


Table of Contents

 
  •  average equity of 11.9% of total assets; and
 
  •  average net income of 0.65% of average assets.
 
The following table presents a summary of selected pricing ratios for us (on a pro forma basis) and the peer group companies, utilized by RP Financial in its appraisal report dated August 26, 2010. These ratios are based on earnings for the 12 months ended June 30, 2010 and stock price information as of August 26, 2010.
 
                         
    Price-to-
  Price-to-
  Price-to-
    Earnings
  Book Value
  Tangible Book
    Multiple   Ratio   Value Ratio
 
New Rockville Financial (on a pro forma basis, assuming completion of the conversion)
                       
Minimum
    17.13       71.99       72.31  
Midpoint
    20.29       79.62       79.94  
Maximum
    23.50       86.36       86.66  
Adjusted Maximum
    27.24       93.20       93.55  
Valuation of peer group companies, all of which are fully converted (on an historical basis)
                       
Average
    16.88       92.57       103.83  
Median
    14.37       91.33       107.99  
 
Compared to the average pricing ratios of the peer group, our pro forma pricing ratios at the maximum of the offering range indicated a 39.2% premium on a price-to-earnings basis, a discount of 6.7% on a price-to-book basis and a discount of 16.5% on a price-to-tangible book basis. This means that, at the maximum of the offering range, a share of our common stock would be less expensive than the peer group on a book value and tangible book value basis.
 
Compared to the median pricing ratios of the peer group, our pro form pricing ratios at the maximum of the offering range indicated a 63.5% premium on a price-to earnings basis, a discount of 5.4% on a price-to-book basis and a 19.8% discount on a price-to-tangible book basis. This means that, at the maximum of the offering range, a share of our common stock would be less expensive than the peer group on a book value and tangible book value basis. For more information, see “PRO FORMA DATA”.
 
Our Board of Directors determined that the offering range was reasonable and appropriate after considering the different elements of the appraisal, the methodology utilized by RP Financial and the conclusions set forth in the appraisal report. The Board considered the range of price-to-earnings multiples and the range of price-to-book value and price-to-tangible book value ratios at the different amounts of shares to be sold in the offering, but did not consider one valuation approach to be more important than the others. Rather, in approving the appraisal, the Board concluded that these ranges represented the appropriate balance of the approaches to establishing our valuation and the number of shares to be sold in comparison to the peer group institutions. The estimated appraised value took into consideration the potential financial impact of the conversion and the offering, as well as the trading price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. The closing price of the common stock was $      per share on          , 2010, the last trading day immediately preceding the announcement of the conversion, and $      per share on August 26, 2010, the effective date of the appraisal.
 
The independent appraisal also reflects the cash contribution to the charitable foundation. The cash contribution to the charitable foundation will reduce our estimated pro forma market value.
 
The appraisal is not intended, and must not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing our common stock. The independent appraisal does not indicate market value. You should not assume or expect that our valuation as indicated in the appraisal means that after the conversion and offering the shares of our common stock will trade at or above the $10.00 per share purchase price. Furthermore, the pricing ratios presented in the appraisal were utilized by RP Financial to estimate our market value and not to compare the relative value of shares of our common stock with the value of the capital stock of the peer group. Because of differences in important factors such as


7


Table of Contents

operating characteristics, location, financial performance, asset size, capital structure and business prospects between us and other fully converted institutions, you should not rely on these comparative valuation ratios as an indication as to whether or not our common stock is an appropriate investment for you.
 
Benefits to Management and Potential Dilution to Shareholders Resulting from the Conversion and Offering
 
We intend to maintain and adopt the stock benefit plans described in more detail below. We will recognize additional compensation expense related to expanding our existing employee stock ownership plan and adopting one or more new stock benefit plans. The actual expense will depend on the market value of our common stock and will increase or decrease as the value of our common stock increases or decreases. As reflected under “PRO FORMA DATA” based upon assumptions set forth therein, we would recognize additional expense of $      for the year ended December 31, 2009, assuming shares of our common stock are sold at the maximum of the offering range. If awards under the new stock benefit plans are funded from authorized but unissued stock, your ownership interest would be diluted by up to 7.53%. See “PRO FORMA DATA” for an illustration of the effects of each of these plans.
 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan.   Our existing employee stock ownership plan, the Rockville Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, currently expects to purchase up to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering, or 520,000 shares of common stock, assuming we sell shares up to the maximum of the offering range. When combined with shares to be issued by New Rockville Financial in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial, the employee stock ownership plan will own 5.91% of our issued and outstanding common stock following the conversion. In the event we increase the maximum amount of common stock offered after receiving the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval of an increase in the stock valuation range, our employee stock ownership plan and our other tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans will have first priority to purchase shares offered over the maximum, up to a total of 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering. In the event our employee stock ownership plan chooses not to purchase shares in the offering, with the prior approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, it may purchase shares in the open market or authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. We also reserve the right to have our employee stock ownership plan purchase more than 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering if necessary to complete the offering at the minimum of the offering range. The employee stock ownership plan will use the proceeds from a 30-year loan from New Rockville Financial to purchase these shares in the offering. As the loan is repaid and shares are released from collateral, the shares will be allocated to the accounts of employee participants. Allocations will be based on a participant’s individual compensation (subject to compensation caps established by law) as a percentage of total plan compensation. Non-employee directors are ineligible to participate in the employee stock ownership plan.
 
Stock Benefit Plans.   We intend to implement one or more new stock benefit plans no earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion and offering. We will submit any such plans to our shareholders for their approval. The terms and conditions of such stock benefit plans, including the number of shares available per award and the types of awards, have not been determined at this time. However, if we do implement one or more stock benefit plans within 12 months following the completion of the conversion and offering, with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval, the plans will reserve a number of shares up to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering for awards to key employees and directors, at no cost to the recipients and a number of shares up to 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options. The Connecticut Department of Banking regulations impose the above percentage limitations on all stock benefit plans implemented within 12 months of the conversion and offering. The following are other limitations imposed by these regulations on stock benefit plans implemented within 12 months of the completion of the conversion and offering: (i) an individual may not receive more than 25.0% of the shares under any plan; (ii) non-employee directors may not receive more than 5.0% of the shares of any plan individually, or 30.0% of the shares of any one or more plans in the aggregate; (iii) stock options may not be granted at less than the market price of such options at the time of grant; (iv) the grants may not vest earlier than one year after the plan is approved by shareholders or at a rate


8


Table of Contents

exceeding 20.0% per year; (v) management and employee stock benefit plans may not be funded with shares issued at the time of the conversion; and (vi) officers and directors must exercise or forfeit their options if we become critically undercapitalized, are subject to an enforcement action by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner or receive a capital directive from the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. In the event the stock benefit plans are adopted more than 12 months after the completion of the conversion and the offering, we will not be subject to certain of the limitations set forth above. We have not yet determined when these plans will be adopted.
 
The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock and the aggregate dollar value of grants under the stock benefit plans at each point in the offering range if such plans reserve a number of shares of common stock equal to 4.0% of the shares sold in the offering for restricted stock awards to key employees and directors and a number of shares of common stock equal to 10.0% of the shares sold in the offering for stock options. Also set forth below is the number of shares of common stock to be acquired by the employee stock ownership plan for allocation to all qualifying employees. The following table also shows the dilution to shareholders if shares are issued from authorized but unissued shares, instead of shares purchased in the open market.
 
                                                 
                      Maximum
             
                      Dilution
             
    Number of Shares or Options to be Granted     Resulting
             
                As a
    from
             
                Percentage
    Issuance
    Value of New Available Grants, in Thousands  
    At
    At Adjusted
    of Common
    of Shares
    At
    At Adjusted
 
    Minimum of
    Maximum of
    Stock to be
    for Stock
    Minimum of
    Maximum of
 
    Offering
    Offering
    Issued in the
    Benefit
    Offering
    Offering
 
    Range     Range     Offering     Plans     Range     Range  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Employee stock ownership plan
    442,000       687,700       4.00 %     0.00 %   $ 4,420     $ 6,877  
Restricted stock awards
    442,000       687,700       4.00       2.27       4,420       6,877  
Stock options(1)
    1,105,000       1,719,250       10.00       5.50       4,497       6,997  
                                                 
Total
    1,989,000       3,094,650       18.00 %     7.53 %   $ 13,337     $ 20,751  
                                                 
 
 
(1) For purposes of this table, fair value for stock awards is assumed to be the same as the offering price of $10.00 per share. The fair value of stock options has been estimated at $4.07 per option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, adjusted for the exchange ratio, with the following assumptions: a grant-date share price and option exercise price of $10.00; an expected option life of five years; a dividend yield of 1.8%; an interest rate of 1.79%; and a volatility rate of 47.54%. The actual value of option grants will be determined by the grant-date fair value of the options, which will depend on a number of factors, including the valuation assumptions used in the option pricing model ultimately adopted.
 
(2) Represents the dilution of stock ownership interest. No dilution is reflected for the employee stock ownership plan because such shares are assumed to be purchased in the offering.
 
We may fund our stock benefit plans through open market purchases, as opposed to new issuances of stock; however, if any options previously granted under our existing stock incentive plan are exercised during the first year following completion of the offering, they will be funded with newly issued shares, as Connecticut Department of Banking regulations do not permit us to repurchase our shares during the first year following the completion of the conversion and offering, except under certain limited circumstances, including funding tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans or management recognition plans that have been approved by shareholders.


9


Table of Contents

The following table presents information as of June 30, 2010 regarding the Rockville Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, the Rockville Financial, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan, and our proposed stock benefit plans. The table below assumes that 25,691,700 shares are outstanding after the offering, which includes the sale of 14,950,000 shares in the offering at the maximum of the offering range and the issuance of shares in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial using an exchange ratio of 1.3158. It also assumes that the value of the stock is $10.00 per share.
 
                             
                    Percentage of
 
                    Shares
 
        Shares at
          Outstanding
 
        Maximum of
    Estimated Value of
    After the
 
Existing and New Stock Benefit Plans
 
Participants
  Offering Range     Shares     Conversion  
 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan:
                           
Shares purchased in 2005 offering(1)
  Employees     920,606 (2)   $ 9,206,060       3.58 %
Shares to be purchased in this offering
  Employees     598,000       5,980,000       2.33  
                             
Total employee stock ownership plan shares
  Employees     1,518,606     $ 15,186,060       5.91 (3)
                             
Restricted Stock Awards:
                           
2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan(1)
  Directors,
Officers and
Employees
    460,306 (4)     4,603,063 (5)     1.79  
New shares of restricted stock
  Directors,     598,000       5,980,000       2.33  
                             
    Officers and
Employees
                       
Total shares of restricted stock
  Directors,     1,058,306     $ 10,583,063       4.12  
                             
    Officers and
Employees
                       
Stock Options:
                           
2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan(1)
  Directors,
Officers
and Employees
    1,150,766 (6)     2,336,055 (7)     4.48  
New stock options
  Directors,     1,495,000       3,034,850       5.82  
                             
    Officers and
Employees
                       
Total stock options
  Directors,     2,645,766     $ 5,370,905       10.30 (8)
                             
    Officers and
Employees
                       
Total of Stock Benefit Plans
        5,222,678     $ 31,140,028       20.33 %
                             
 
 
(1) The number of shares indicated has been adjusted for the 1.3158 exchange ratio at the maximum of the offering range. The valuation and ownership ratios reflect the dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets upon completion of the conversion. See “IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY STOCK OWNERSHIP” for more information regarding the dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets on the valuation and ownership ratios.
 
(2) As of June 30, 2010, 904,349 shares, or 687,300 shares prior to adjustment for the exchange, have been allocated.
 
(3) As of June 30, 2010, 904,349 shares, or 687,300 shares prior to adjustment for the exchange have been allocated, or 5.85% after the conversion.
 
(4) As of June 30, 2010, 41,770 shares, or 31,745 shares prior to adjustment for the exchange have been awarded and 41,983, or 31,907 shares prior to adjustment for the exchange remain available for future awards. As of June 30, 2010, 9,950 shares vested and the shares have been distributed.


10


Table of Contents

 
(5) The value of restricted stock awards is determined based on their fair value as of the date grants are made. For purposes of this table, the fair value of awards under the new stock benefit plan is assumed to be the same as the offering price of $10.00 per share.
 
(6) As of June 30, 2010, options to purchase 586,682 shares, or 445,875 shares prior to adjustment for the exchange were outstanding, and 548,293 options, or 416,700 options prior to adjustment for the exchange remain available for future grants. At June 30, 2010, 363,155 unexercised and fully vested options were outstanding under this plan prior to adjustment for the exchange.
 
(7) The weighted-average fair value of stock options has been estimated at $4.08 per option, adjusted for the exchange rate, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
 
(8) The number of stock options set forth in the table would exceed regulatory limits if a stock benefit plan was adopted within one year of the completion of the conversion. Accordingly, the number of new stock options set forth in the table would have to be reduced such that the aggregate amount of stock options would be 10.0% or less, unless we obtain a waiver from the Connecticut Department of Banking, or we implement the plan after twelve months following the completion of the conversion. Our current intention is to implement a new stock benefit plan no earlier than six months after completion of the conversion
 
The grant-date fair value of the options granted under the new stock benefit plans, which will not be implemented until at least six months after the completion of the conversion, will be based in part on the price of shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial at the time the options are granted. The value also will depend on the various assumptions utilized in the option pricing model ultimately adopted. The following table presents the total estimated fair value of the options to be available for grant under the stock benefit plan using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, assuming the market price and exercise price for the stock options are equal and the range of market prices for the shares is $8.00 per share to $14.00 per share. The Black-Scholes option pricing model provides an estimate only of the fair value of the options, and the actual value of the options may differ significantly from the value set forth in this table.
 
                                         
                            1,719,250
 
          1,105,000
    1,300,000
    1,495,000
    Options at
 
    Grant-Date
    Options at
    Options at
    Options at
    Adjusted
 
    Fair Value per
    Minimum of
    Midpoint of
    Maximum of
    Maximum of
 
Exercise Price
  Option     Range     Range     Range     Range  
 
$8.00
    1.62       1,790,100       2,106,000       2,421,900       2,785,185  
$10.00
    2.03       2,243,150       2,639,000       3,034,850       3,490,078  
$12.00
    2.44       2,696,200       3,172,000       3,647,800       4,194,970  
$14.00
    2.84       3,138,200       3,692,000       4,245,800       4,882,670  
 
The value of the restricted shares awarded under the stock benefit plans, which will not be implemented until at least six months after completion of the conversion and offering, will be based on the market value of our common stock at the time the shares are awarded. The following table presents the total value of all restricted stock that would be available for award and issuance under the new stock benefit plan, assuming the market price of our common stock ranges from $8.00 per share to $14.00 per share.
 
                                 
                598,000
    687,700
 
    442,000
    520,000
    Shares Awarded at
    Shares Awarded at
 
    Shares Awarded at
    Shares Awarded at
    Maximum of
    Adjusted
 
Share Price
  Minimum of Range     Midpoint of Range     Range     Maximum of Range  
 
$8.00
    3,536,000       4,160,000       4,784,000       5,501,600  
$10.00
    4,420,000       5,200,000       5,980,000       6,877,000  
$12.00
    5,304,000       6,240,000       7,176,000       8,252,400  
$14.00
    6,188,000       7,280,000       8,372,000       9,627,800  
 
The tables presented above are provided for informational purposes only. There can be no assurance that our stock price will not trade below $10.00 per share. Before you make an investment decision, we urge you to read this prospectus carefully, including, but not limited to, the section entitled “RISK FACTORS” beginning on page 20.


11


Table of Contents

The Exchange of Existing Shares of Existing Rockville Financial Common Stock
 
If you are currently a shareholder of Existing Rockville Financial, your shares will be canceled at the conclusion of the conversion and offering and become the right to receive shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial. The number of shares of common stock you receive will be based on an exchange ratio determined as of the closing of the conversion and offering, which will depend on our final appraised value. The following table shows how the exchange ratio will adjust based on the valuation of New Rockville Financial and the number of shares of common stock issued in the offering. The table also shows the number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock a hypothetical owner of Existing Rockville Financial common stock would receive in exchange for 100 shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock owned at the consummation of the conversion, depending on the number of shares of common stock issued in the offering.
 
                                                                 
                    Total
           
                    Shares of
           
                    Common
           
            Shares of New Rockville
  Stock to be
      Equivalent
   
            Financial to be Issued
  Issued in
      Value of
  Shares to be
    Shares to be Sold in
  for Shares of Existing
  Conversion
      Shares Based
  Received for
    This Offering   Rockville Financial   and
  Exchange
  Upon Current
  100 Existing
    Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent   Offering(1)   Ratio   Market Price(2)   Shares
 
Minimum
    11,050,000       58.19 %     7,939,517       41.81 %     18,989,517       0.9725     $ 189,895,170       97  
Midpoint
    13,000,000       58.19       9,340,608       41.81       22,340,608       1.1441       223,406,080       114  
Maximum
    14,950,000       58.19       10,741,700       41.81       25,691,700       1.3158       256,917,000       131  
Adjusted Maximum
    17,192,500       58.19       12,352,955       41.81       29,545,455       1.5131       295,454,550       151  
 
 
(1) Valuation and ownership ratios reflect dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets upon completion of the conversion. See “IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY STOCK OWNERSHIP” for more information regarding the dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets on the valuation and ownership ratios.
 
(2) Represents the value of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock received in the conversion by a holder of one share of Existing Rockville Financial, at the exchange ratio, assuming the market price of $10.00 per share.
 
If you own shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock in a brokerage account in “street name,” you do not need to take any action to exchange your shares of common stock, as the exchange will occur automatically on or about the effective date of the conversion. If you own shares in the form of Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates, you will receive a transmittal form with instructions to surrender your stock certificates as soon as practicable after consummation of the conversion. New certificates of New Rockville Financial common stock will be mailed to you within five business days after our exchange agent receives your properly executed transmittal forms and your Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates.
 
You should not submit a stock certificate until you receive a transmittal form.
 
No fractional shares of New Rockville Financial common stock will be issued to any public shareholder of Existing Rockville Financial. For each fractional share that otherwise would be issued, New Rockville Financial will pay in cash an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying the fractional share interest to which the holder otherwise would be entitled by the $10.00 per share purchase price.
 
Outstanding shares of restricted stock and options to purchase shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock also will convert automatically into and become shares of restricted stock and options to purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be received upon exercise of these options and the related exercise price will be adjusted pursuant to the exchange ratio. The aggregate exercise price, duration and vesting schedule of these awards will not be affected by the conversion. Because the Connecticut Department of Banking regulations do not permit us to repurchase our shares during the first year following the completion of the conversion and offering except under limited circumstances, we may use authorized but unissued shares to fund option exercises that occur during the first


12


Table of Contents

year following the conversion. If all existing options were exercised for authorized but unissued shares of common stock following the conversion, shareholders would experience dilution of     % at both the minimum and the maximum of the offering range.
 
Impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s Assets on Minority Stock Ownership
 
In the exchange, the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in exchange for their shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial pursuant to an exchange ratio that ensures, subject to adjustment, that the shareholders will own the same percentage of the common stock of New Rockville Financial after the conversion as they held in Existing Rockville Financial immediately prior to the conversion, without giving effect to new shares purchased in the offering or cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares. However, in accordance with the policies of the FDIC and Federal Reserve Board, the exchange ratio must be adjusted downward to reflect the aggregate amount of Existing Rockville Financial dividends paid to Rockville Financial MHC and the initial capitalization of Rockville Financial MHC. Dividends were paid to Rockville Financial MHC because the Federal Reserve Board’s dividend policy does not permit a mutual holding company to waive dividends declared by its subsidiary. Rockville Financial MHC had assets of $7.685 million as of June 30, 2010, not including Existing Rockville Financial common stock. The adjustments described above will decrease Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders’ ownership interest in New Rockville Financial from 43.30% to 41.81%.
 
Our Contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc.
 
In connection with the conversion and offering and in furtherance of our commitment to our community, we intend to use a portion of the proceeds from the offering to make a cash contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. The amount to be contributed will equal 3.0% of the net proceeds of the offering.
 
The foundation was established in May 2005 in connection with Existing Rockville Financial’s minority stock issuance. The foundation, which is not a subsidiary, provides grants to individuals and not-for-profit organizations within the communities that we serve. We believe that funding the foundation will allow our community to benefit from our growth and financial success. At June 30, 2010, the foundation had assets of $4.5 million, which included Existing Rockville Financial common stock with a value of $3.8 million.
 
The cash contribution to the foundation has been approved by the Boards of Directors of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank. The contribution must also be approved by the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC at the special meeting being held to consider and vote upon the plan of conversion. If the corporators do not approve the contribution to the charitable foundation, we will proceed with the conversion without funding the foundation and will not resolicit subscribers (unless required by the Connecticut Department of Banking).
 
We considered the impact to our shareholders resulting from our contribution of cash to the foundation. We believe that if our contribution to the foundation exceeds the 10.0% annual limitation on charitable deductions described below, the excess is justified given our capital position and earnings, the substantial additional capital being raised in the offering and the potential benefits of the foundation to our community. In addition, the amount of the contribution will not adversely affect our financial condition. We therefore believe that the amount of the charitable contribution is reasonable given our pro forma capital position and that it does not raise safety and soundness concerns.
 
Without the contribution to the charitable foundation, RP Financial estimates that our pro forma valuation would be greater and, as a result, a greater number of shares of common stock would be issued in the offering. RP Financial will update its appraisal of our estimated pro forma market value at the conclusion of the offering. The pro forma market value reflected in that updated appraisal will be based on the facts and circumstances existing at that time, including, among other things, market and financial conditions, as well as whether we will make the proposed contribution to the charitable foundation.
 
We have received an opinion from our independent tax advisor that our contribution of cash to the foundation should not constitute an act of self-dealing and that we should be entitled to a deduction in the


13


Table of Contents

amount of the cash contribution at the time of the contribution. We are permitted to deduct only an amount equal to 10.0% of our annual taxable income in any one year. We are permitted under the Internal Revenue Code to carry over the excess contribution for the five-year period following the contribution to the foundation. We estimate that substantially all of the contribution should be deductible over the six-year period. However, even if the contribution is deductable, we may not have sufficient earnings to be able to use the deduction in full. We do not expect to make any further contributions to the foundation within the first five years following the conversion, unless such contributions would be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. Any such decisions would be based on an assessment of, among other factors, our financial condition at that time, the interests of our shareholders and Rockville Bank’s depositors, and the financial condition and operations of the foundation.
 
See “RISK FACTORS — The Contribution To The Charitable Foundation Will Adversely Affect Net Income” and “ROCKVILLE BANK FOUNDATION, INC.”
 
Persons Who May Order Shares of Common Stock in the Offering
 
We are offering shares of New Rockville Financial common stock in a subscription offering in the following descending order of priority:
 
(1) First, to depositors with accounts at Rockville Bank with aggregate balances of at least $50.00 at the close of business on June 30, 2009.
 
(2) Second, to our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans (including our employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan), who will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase in the aggregate up to 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering. Our employee stock ownership plan currently intends to purchase up to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering, with the remaining shares in this purchase priority allocated to our 401(k) plan and any other tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan.
 
(3) Third, to depositors with accounts at Rockville Bank with aggregate balances of at least $50.00 at the close of business on          .
 
We may offer for sale shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering to the general public in a community offering, with a preference given to the below groups in the following descending order of priority:
 
(1) First, to natural persons residing in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut.
 
(2) Second, to Existing Rockville Financial public shareholders as of [Shareholder Record Date].
 
(3) Third, to other natural persons residing in Connecticut.
 
The community offering, if held, may begin concurrently with, during or promptly after the subscription offering as we may determine at any time. We also may offer for sale shares of our common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering or community offering through a syndicated community offering managed by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
 
The syndicated community offering, if held, will begin during or promptly after the subscription offering as we may determine at any time.
 
We have the right to accept or reject, in our sole discretion, orders received in the community offering or syndicated community offering. We have not established any set criteria for determining whether to accept or reject a purchase order in the community offering or the syndicated community offering and, accordingly, any determination to accept or reject purchase orders will be based on the facts and circumstances available to management at the time of the determination.
 
If we receive orders for more shares than we are offering, we may not be able to fully or partially fill your order. Shares will be allocated first to categories in the subscription offering. A detailed description of


14


Table of Contents

share allocation procedures can be found in the section of this prospectus entitled “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING”.
 
You May Not Sell or Transfer Your Subscription Rights
 
You are prohibited by law from transferring your subscription rights. If you order stock in the subscription offering, you will be required to state that you are purchasing the stock for yourself and that you have no agreement or understanding to sell or transfer your subscription rights. We intend to take legal action, including reporting persons to federal or state regulatory agencies, against anyone who we believe sells or gives away their subscription rights. Civil suits and criminal prosecutions have been brought against individuals transferring or participating in the transfer of subscription rights in connection with other conversion transactions. We will not accept your order if we have reason to believe that you sold or transferred your subscription rights. In addition, on the order form, you may not add the name of others for joint stock registration who do not have subscription rights or who qualify only in a lower subscription offering priority than you do. You may add only those persons who were eligible to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription offering on your eligibility date. The stock order form requires that you list all deposit accounts, giving all names on each account and the account number at the applicable eligibility date. Failure to provide this information, or providing incomplete or incorrect information, may result in a loss of part or all of your share allocation, if there is an oversubscription.
 
Limits on How Much Common Stock You May Purchase
 
In connection with the conversion and offering, our Board of Directors has established the following purchase limitations:
 
  •  The minimum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased is 25.
 
  •  The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased by an individual or an individual, together with any of the following persons, cannot exceed 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering:
 
  •  a person who is related by blood or marriage to you and who lives in the same home as you;
 
  •  corporations and organizations in which you are an officer or partner or have a 10.0% or more ownership interest;
 
  •  trusts or other estates in which you have a substantial beneficial interest or for which you are a trustee or fiduciary; or
 
  •  other persons who may be your associates or persons acting in concert with you.
 
Unless we determine otherwise, persons having the same address and persons exercising subscription rights through qualifying deposit accounts registered to the same address will be subject to this overall purchase limitation of 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering.
 
In addition, no person, together with any associate or persons acting in concert may purchase shares of common stock, that when combined with any shares of common stock received in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial, would exceed 5.0% of the total number of shares of New Rockville Financial outstanding after the consummation of the offering and the conversion, provided, however, that this limitation does not require a shareholder to divest any shares of New Rockville Financial received in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial or otherwise limit the amount of shares to be issued to such shareholders in the exchange.
 
Subject to receipt of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval, we may increase or decrease the purchase and ownership limitations at any time. We may further increase the maximum purchase limitation to 10.0%, provided that orders for common stock exceeding 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering may not exceed in the aggregate 10.0% of the total shares of common stock sold in the offering. Our


15


Table of Contents

tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including our stock ownership plan, are authorized to purchase up to 10.0% of the shares sold in the offering, without regard to these purchase limitations.
 
See the detailed description of “acting in concert” and “associate” in the section of this prospectus headed “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”.
 
Steps We May Take if We Do Not Receive Orders for the Minimum Number of Shares
 
If we do not receive orders for at least 11,050,000 shares of common stock, we may take several steps in order to issue the minimum number of shares of common stock in the offering range. Specifically, we may:
 
  •  increase the purchase and ownership limitations, subject to regulatory approval;
 
  •  seek regulatory approval to extend the offering beyond the [Date 2] expiration date, provided that any such extension will require us to resolicit subscriptions received in the offering; and/or
 
  •  increase the number of shares to be purchased by our employee stock ownership plan.
 
How You May Purchase Shares of Common Stock:
 
To purchase shares you must deliver a properly completed and signed original stock order form, accompanied by payment or Rockville Bank deposit account withdrawal authorization, as described below. You may submit your order form in one of the following ways: by mail, using the stock order reply envelope provided, by overnight delivery to the Stock Information Center at the address indicated on the stock order form or by hand-delivery to the Stock Information Center, located at 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. Stock order forms will not be accepted by mail or by hand-delivery at any of our branch offices. We are not required to accept copies or facsimiles of order forms.
 
In the subscription offering and community offering, you may pay for your shares only by:
 
1.  Personal Check, bank check or money order.   Personal checks, bank checks and money orders, payable to New Rockville Financial will be immediately cashed and will be deposited in a separate account with Rockville Bank. Third party and Rockville Bank line of credit checks may not be remitted as payment for your order. We will pay interest in these funds at our passbook savings rate from the date payment is received until completion or termination of the conversion and offering. Wire transfers as payment for shares of common stock ordered will not be permitted or accepted as proper payment. You should not mail cash.
 
2.  Authorized account withdrawal.   The stock order form outlines the types of Rockville Bank deposit accounts that you may authorize for direct withdrawal. You may not request a direct withdrawal from any checking account. A hold will be placed on these funds when your stock order form is received, making the funds unavailable to you, provided, however, these funds will not be withdrawn from your accounts until the completion or termination of the conversion and offering and will earn interest at the applicable deposit account rate until then. The funds you authorize must be in your account at the time your stock order form is received. You may authorize funds from your certificate of deposit accounts without incurring an early withdrawal penalty, with the agreement that the withdrawal is being made for the purchase of shares in the offering. If a withdrawal results in a certificate account with a balance less than the applicable minimum balance requirement, the certificate will be canceled at the time of withdrawal without penalty and the remaining balance will earn interest at the current passbook rate subsequent to the withdrawal. You may not authorize direct withdrawals from retirement accounts held by Rockville Bank. Funds withdrawn from deposit accounts at Rockville Bank may reduce or eliminate a depositor’s liquidation rights. Please see the section of this prospectus entitled “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Liquidation Rights” for further information.
 
We may not lend funds or extend a line of credit (including line of credit or overdraft checking) to anyone for the purpose of purchasing shares in the offering.


16


Table of Contents

We reserve the right to waive, or permit the correction of, incomplete or improperly executed stock order forms on a case by case basis, but do not represent that we will do so. Once your order is received by us, you may not change, modify or cancel your order. Our employees and Stock Information Center staff are not responsible for correcting or completing the information provided on the stock order forms we receive, including the account information requested for the purpose of verifying subscription rights.
 
By signing the stock order form, you are acknowledging both receipt of this prospectus and that the shares of common stock are not deposits or savings accounts that are federally insured or otherwise guaranteed by Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial or the federal government.
 
Using IRA Funds to Purchase Shares of Common Stock
 
You may be able to subscribe for shares of common stock using funds in your individual retirement account(s), or IRA. However, shares of common stock must be held in a self-directed retirement account maintained by an unaffiliated institutional trustee or custodian, such as a brokerage firm. Rockville Bank’s individual retirement accounts are not self-directed, so funds in such accounts cannot be invested in our common stock. You may transfer some or all of the funds in your Rockville Bank individual retirement account to a self-directed account maintained by an unaffiliated institutional trustee or custodian. If you do not have such an account, you will need to establish one and transfer your funds before placing your stock order. Because individual circumstances differ and processing of retirement account transactions takes additional time, we recommend that you promptly contact (preferably at least two weeks before the [Date 1] offering deadline) our Stock Information Center for assistance with purchases using your individual retirement account or other retirement account that you may have at Rockville Bank or elsewhere. Whether you may use such funds for the purchase of shares in the stock offering may depend on timing constraints and, possibly, limitations imposed by the institution where the funds are held. See “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Using IRA Funds to Purchase Shares of Common Stock”.
 
Deadline for Orders of Common Stock
 
If you wish to purchase shares of common stock, the Stock Information Center must receive (not postmarked) a properly completed and signed original stock order form, together with full payment for the shares of common stock, no later than 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], unless we extend this deadline. We expect that the community offering, if held, will terminate at the same time, although it may continue until [Date 2] or longer if the Connecticut Banking Commissioner approves a later date. Once submitted, your order is irrevocable unless the offering is terminated or extended beyond [Date 2] or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to fewer than 11,050,000 shares. In either of these cases, you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order. If we do not receive a written response from you regarding your intent, we will cancel your order, promptly return to you all funds received by us with interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, and cancel any deposit account withdrawal authorizations. No single extension may last longer than 90 days. All extensions, in the aggregate, may not last beyond [Date 3].
 
Delivery of Prospectus
 
To ensure that each purchaser in the subscription and community offering receives a prospectus at least 48 hours before the offering deadline in accordance with Rule 15c2-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we will not mail a prospectus any later than five days prior to such date or hand-deliver a prospectus later than two days prior to that date. Stock order forms may only be delivered if accompanied or preceded by a prospectus. We are not obligated to deliver a prospectus or order form by means other than United States mail.
 
We will make reasonable attempts to deliver a prospectus and offering materials to holders of subscription rights. However, the subscription offering and all subscription rights will expire at 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], 2010 whether or not we have been able to locate each person entitled to subscription rights.


17


Table of Contents

Delivery of Stock Certificates
 
Certificates representing shares of common stock sold in the offering will be mailed to the persons entitled thereto at the certificate registration address noted by them on their order form, as soon as practicable following consummation of the offering and receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals. It is possible that until certificates for the common stock are delivered to purchasers, purchasers might not be able to sell the shares of common stock that they ordered, even though the common stock will have begun trading. If you are currently a shareholder of Existing Rockville Financial, see “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Exchange of Existing Shareholders’ Stock Certificates”.
 
Market for Common Stock
 
Existing publicly held shares of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RCKB”. Upon completion of the conversion, Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock will be replaced by the common stock of New Rockville Financial. We expect the New Rockville Financial’s common stock will trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RCKBD” for a period of 20 trading days after the completion of the offering. Thereafter, our trading symbol will revert to “RCKB”. New Rockville Financial’s name will be changed to “Rockville Financial, Inc.” upon completion of the conversion and offering. In order to list our stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we are required to have at least three broker-dealers who will make a market in our common stock. Existing Rockville Financial currently has more than three market makers, including Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. has advised us that it intends to make a market in our common stock following the offering, but it is under no obligation to do so. See “MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK” for more information regarding the market for our common stock.
 
Our Dividend Policy
 
We have paid quarterly cash dividends since the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006. For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share, or $0.24 on an annualized basis. After we complete the conversion and offering, we intend to continue to pay dividends on our outstanding shares of common stock. We expect that the level of cash dividends per share after the conversion and offering will be consistent with the current amount of dividends per share we pay on our common stock, as adjusted for the additional shares issued pursuant to the exchange and offering. For example, based on the current annualized cash dividend of $0.24 per share and an assumed exchange ratio of 1.3158 at the maximum of the offering range, the annualized cash dividend, if paid, would be $0.18 per share, which represents an annual dividend yield of 1.80% at the maximum of the offering range, based upon a stock price of $10.00 per share. However, the dividend rate and the continued payment of dividends will depend on a number of factors including our capital requirements, our financial condition and results of operations, the rate of tax on dividends, statutory and regulatory limitations, and general economic conditions. We cannot assure you that we will not reduce or eliminate dividends in the future.
 
See “SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES” and “MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK” for information regarding our historical dividend payments.
 
Tax Consequences
 
As a general matter, the conversion will not be a taxable transaction for purposes of federal or state income taxes to Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial, persons eligible to subscribe in the subscription offering or existing shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial. However, shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial who receive cash in lieu of fractional interests in shares of New Rockville Financial will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the cash received and the tax basis of the fractional share.


18


Table of Contents

Conditions to Completion of the Conversion
 
We cannot complete the conversion and offering unless:
 
  •  We sell at least the minimum number of shares of common stock offered;
 
  •  The plan of conversion is approved by at least 80.0% of votes eligible to be cast by the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC;
 
  •  The plan of conversion is approved by at least a majority of the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC who are not our employees, officers, directors, trustees or significant borrowers;
 
  •  The plan of conversion is approved by at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial as of [the shareholder record date], including shares held by Rockville Financial MHC Because Existing Rockville Financial MHC owns 56.7% of the outstanding shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, Rockville Financial MHC will have control over the outcome of this vote;
 
  •  The plan of conversion is approved by at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial as of [the shareholder record date], excluding those shares held by Rockville Financial MHC;
 
  •  We receive the final approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner to complete the conversion and the offering and receive no objection to the conversion and offering by the FDIC; and
 
  •  We receive the final approval from the Federal Reserve Board for New Rockville Financial to become a bank holding company and own 100.0% of Rockville Bank’s capital stock.
 
Subject to corporator and regulatory approvals, we also intend to make a cash contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. in connection with the conversion and offering. However, corporator approval of the contribution to the foundation is not a condition to the completion of the conversion and offering.
 
Rockville Financial MHC intends to vote its ownership interest in favor of adoption of the plan of conversion and funding the charitable foundation. At September 16, 2010, our directors and executive officers and their affiliates owned 4.22% shares of Existing Rockville Financial, or 9.75% of the outstanding shares of common stock, excluding shares owned by Rockville Financial MHC. Our directors and executive officers intend to vote their shares in favor of the plan of conversion.
 
How You Can Obtain Additional Information — Stock Information Center
 
Our banking personnel may not, by law, assist with investment-related questions about the offering. If you have any questions regarding the conversion or offering, please call our Stock Information Center, Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Stock Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank holidays. The toll-free phone number is (          )          -          . In addition, a representative of Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, Inc. will be available to meet with you in person between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at our administrative office at 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074.


19


Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
 
You should consider carefully the following risk factors in evaluating an investment in shares of our common stock. An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all other information included in this prospectus.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
Our success depends on our key personnel, including our executive officers, and the loss of key personnel or the transition of key personnel, including our Chief Executive and our former Chief Operating Officer, could disrupt our business.
 
Our success greatly depends on the contributions of our senior management and other key personnel. In June 2009, we announced that William J. McGurk, our longstanding President and Chief Executive Officer, will retire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in April, 2011. Mr. McGurk will remain on our Board of Directors until his term expires in 2013. The Board and Mr. McGurk have had preliminary discussions regarding a possible continuing consulting role after his retirement. In addition, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. retired on June 30, 2010. Mr. Jeamel remains on the Board until 2011 when his current term expires. The Board intends to nominate him for an additional one-year term until 2012 to facilitate transition issues and to amend the Board of Director’s policy on mandatory retirement to allow him to serve the additional year. Mr. Jeamel currently consults for Rockville Bank as well. His former Chief Operating Officer responsibilities were assumed by Executive Vice Presidents, Christopher E. Buchholz and Richard J. Trachimowicz. Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel have been key contributors in our successful growth and operation, and Mr. McGurk is frequently referred to as “the face” of Rockville Bank. We are currently engaged in a search for Mr. McGurk’s successor and expect to identify Mr. McGurk’s replacement in January 2011. A new Chief Operating Officer may be named after consultation with the new Chief Executive Officer. While we will strive to make this transition as smooth as possible, this leadership change may result in disruptions to our business or operations. In addition, our success will depend on our ability to recruit and retain additional highly-skilled personnel.
 
We are subject to lending risk and could incur losses in our loan portfolio despite our underwriting practices.
 
Rockville Bank originates commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer loans, and residential mortgage loans primarily within its market area. Commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, and consumer loans may expose a lender to greater credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral securing these loans may not be sold as easily as residential real estate. In addition, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans may also involve relatively large loan balances to individual borrowers or groups of borrowers. These loans also have a greater credit risk than residential real estate for the following reasons:
 
  •  Commercial and Industrial Loans.   Repayment is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business.
 
  •  Commercial Real Estate Loans.   Repayment is dependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service.
 
  •  Consumer Loans.   Consumer loans are collateralized, if at all, with assets that may not provide an adequate source of payment of the loan due to depreciation, damage or loss.
 
Due to the economic recession and slow economic recovery, the real estate market and local economy are continuing to deteriorate, which has adversely affected the value of the properties securing the loans or revenues from borrowers’ businesses, thereby increasing the risk of non-performing loans. The decreases in real estate values have adversely affected the value of property used as collateral for our commercial real estate loans. The continued deterioration in the economy and slow economic recovery may also have a negative effect on the ability of our commercial borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which


20


Table of Contents

could have an adverse impact on our earnings. In addition, if poor economic conditions continue to result in decreased demand for loans, our profits may decrease because our alternative investments may earn less income than loans.
 
All of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See further discussion on the commercial loan portfolio in “Lending Activities” within “BUSINESS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND ROCKVILLE BANK”.
 
Because we intend to continue to increase our commercial real estate and commercial business loan originations, our lending risk will increase, and downturns in the real estate market or local economy could adversely affect our earnings.
 
Commercial real estate and commercial business loans generally have more risk than residential mortgage loans. Because the repayment of commercial real estate and commercial business loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’s properties or related businesses, repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the local economy. Commercial real estate and commercial business loans may also involve relatively large loan balances to individual borrowers or groups of related borrowers. A downturn in the real estate market or the local economy could adversely affect the value of properties securing the loan or the revenues from the borrower’s business, thereby increasing the risk of non-performing loans. As our commercial real estate and commercial business loan portfolios increase, the corresponding risks and potential for losses from these loans may also increase.
 
If Rockville Bank’s allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.
 
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. Recent declines in real estate values have impacted the collateral values that secure our real estate loans. The impact of these declines on the original appraised values of secured collateral is difficult to estimate. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we review our loss and delinquency experience on different loan categories, and we evaluate existing economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance, which would decrease our net income. Although we are unaware of any specific problems with our loan portfolio that would require any increase in our allowance at the present time, it may need to be increased further in the future due to our emphasis on loan growth and on increasing our portfolio of commercial business and commercial real estate loans.
 
In addition, banking regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs, although we are unaware of any reason for them to do so at the present time. Any increase in the allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Future changes in interest rates may reduce our profits which could have a negative impact on the value of our stock.
 
Our ability to make a profit largely depends on our net interest income, which could be negatively affected by changes in interest rates. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income Rockville Bank earns on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense Rockville Bank pays on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans. In addition, as market interest rates rise, we will have competitive pressures to increase the rates paid on deposits, which will result in a decrease in our net interest income.
 
In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the average life of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities. A reduction in interest rates results in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed and


21


Table of Contents

related securities, as borrowers refinance their debt in order to reduce their borrowing costs. This creates reinvestment risk, which is the risk that we may not be able to reinvest prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates earned on the prepaid loans or securities.
 
Continued or further declines in the value of certain investment securities could require write-downs, which would reduce our earnings.
 
The unrealized losses within our investment securities portfolio are due to an increase in credit spreads and liquidity issues in the marketplace. We have concluded these unrealized losses are temporary in nature since they are not related to the underlying credit quality of the issuers, and we have the intent and ability to hold these investments for a time necessary to recover our cost at stated maturity (at which time, full payment is expected). However, a continued decline in the value of these securities or other factors could result in an other-than-temporary impairment write-down which would reduce our earnings.
 
If dividends paid on our investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston continue to be suspended, or if our investment is classified as other-than-temporarily impaired or as permanently impaired, our earnings and/or stockholders’ equity could decrease.
 
We own common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”) to qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to borrow funds under the FHLBB’s advance program. There is no market for our FHLBB common stock. The FHLBB also announced that the dividend paid on its common stock has been suspended indefinitely. The continued suspension of the dividend will decrease our income. There can be no assurance that such dividends will be reinstated in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that the impact of recent or future legislation on the Federal Home Loan Banks also will not cause a decrease in the value of the FHLBB stock we hold.
 
It is possible that the capitalization of a Federal Home Loan Bank, including the FHLBB, could be substantially diminished or reduced to zero. Consequently, we believe that there is a risk that our investment in FHLBB common stock could be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired at some time in the future, and if this occurs, it would cause our earnings and stockholders’ equity to decrease by the after-tax amount of the impairment charge.
 
Our stock value may be negatively affected by regulations restricting takeovers.
 
The Change in Bank Control Act and the Bank Holding Company Act, together with Federal Reserve Board regulations promulgated under those laws, require that a person obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve Board before attempting to acquire control of a bank holding company. In addition, the approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner is required prior to an offer being made to purchase or acquire 10.0% or more of our common stock for a period of three years from the completion of the conversion and offering.
 
Rockville Bank has opened new branches and expects to open additional new branches which may incur losses during their initial years of operation as they generate new deposit and loan portfolios.
 
Rockville Bank opened new branch offices in Glastonbury in 2005, in South Glastonbury in 2006, in Enfield and East Windsor in 2007, in Colchester in 2008 and in Manchester and South Windsor in 2009. Rockville Bank intends to continue to explore opportunities to expand its branch network. Losses are expected in connection with these new branches for some time, as the expenses associated with them are largely fixed and are typically greater than the income earned at the outset as the branches build up their customer bases. No assurance can be given as to when, if ever, new branches will become profitable.
 
Strong competition within Rockville Bank’s market area may limit our growth and profitability.
 
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market area, we compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and


22


Table of Contents

offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area. The greater resources and deposit and loan products offered by our competitors may limit our ability to increase our interest-earning assets.
 
Risks Related to the Financial Services Industry
 
The United States economy remains weak and unemployment levels are high. A prolonged economic downturn will adversely affect our business and financial results.
 
The financial industry experienced unprecedented turmoil in 2008, 2009 and continuing into 2010 as some of the world’s major financial institutions collapsed, were seized or were forced into mergers as the credit markets tightened and the economy headed into a recession, eroding confidence in the world’s financial system. As we have seen in the past year, there have been unintended consequences from the measures taken by the federal government in an effort to stabilize the economy. The United States economy remains weak and unemployment levels are high. Worsening of these conditions may adversely affect our business by materially decreasing our net interest income or materially increasing our loan losses. There can be no assurance that we will not be affected by the current crisis in a way we cannot currently predict or mitigate.
 
Passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act will increase our operational and compliance costs.
 
On July 21, 2010, the President of the United States signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). This new law will significantly change the current bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many months or years.
 
The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Rockville Bank, as a bank with $10 billion or less in assets, will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by our primary bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.
 
The Dodd-Frank Act requires minimum leverage (Tier 1) and risk based capital requirements for bank and savings and loan holding companies that are no less than those applicable to banks, which will exclude certain instruments that previously have been eligible for inclusion by bank holding companies as Tier 1 capital, such as trust preferred securities.
 
A provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, which will become effective one year after enactment, eliminates the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses to have interest-bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant change to existing law could have an adverse impact on our interest expense.
 
The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for FDIC deposit insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution, rather than deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and non-interest-bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. The legislation also increases the required minimum reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund, from


23


Table of Contents

1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits, and directs the FDIC to offset the effects of increased assessments on depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.
 
The Dodd-Frank Act will require publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and by authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.
 
It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks. However, it is expected that at a minimum they will increase our operating and compliance costs and could increase our interest expense.
 
Higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance premiums and special assessments will adversely affect our earnings.
 
The FDIC increased deposit insurance premium expense effective June 30, 2009 in the form of a special assessment. The FDIC has exercised its authority to raise assessment rates beginning in 2009, and may impose another special assessment in the future. If such action is taken by the FDIC it could have an adverse effect on our earnings. At present, the FDIC has not required an additional assessment in 2010, but rather required prepayment in 2009 of deposit insurance premiums for 2010 through 2012.
 
We operate in a highly regulated environment and our business may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
 
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, as Rockville Bank’s chartering authority, by the FDIC, as insurer of deposits, and by the Federal Reserve Board as the regulator of Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which a financial institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution and the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, or legislation, may have a material impact on our operations.
 
Risks Related to the Offering
 
The future price of the shares of common stock may be less than the $10.00 purchase price per share in the offering.
 
If you purchase shares of common stock in the offering, you may not be able to sell them later at or above the $10.00 purchase price in the offering. In several cases, shares of common stock issued by newly converted savings institutions or mutual holding companies have traded below the initial offering price. The aggregate purchase price of the shares of common stock sold in the offering will be based on an independent appraisal. The independent appraisal is not intended, and should not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing shares of common stock. The independent appraisal is based on certain estimates, assumptions and projections, all of which are subject to change from time to time. After our shares begin trading, the trading price of our common stock will be determined by the marketplace, and may be influenced by many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the overall performance of the economy, investor perceptions of New Rockville Financial and the outlook for the financial services industry in general. Price fluctuations may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.


24


Table of Contents

Our failure to deploy the net proceeds effectively may have an adverse impact on our financial performance and the value of our common stock.
 
We intend to invest between $52.3 million and $71.1 million of the net proceeds of the offering (or $81.9 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range) in Rockville Bank. Rockville Bank may use the net proceeds it receives to repay approximately $40.0 million of maturing FLBB advances, to fund new loans, to purchase investment securities, to pursue strategic growth opportunities or for other general corporate purposes. We may use the net proceeds retained at New Rockville Financial to invest in short-term liquid investments, to repurchase shares of common stock, to pay dividends to our shareholders, to pursue strategic growth opportunities or for other general corporate purposes. However, with the exception of the loan to the employee stock ownership plan to purchase our common stock and the funding of the charitable foundation, we have not allocated specific amounts of the net proceeds for any of these purposes, and we will have significant flexibility in determining the amount of the net proceeds we apply to different uses and the timing of such applications. We have not established a timetable for reinvesting the net proceeds, and we cannot predict how long reinvesting the net proceeds will require.
 
You may not revoke your decision to purchase New Rockville Financial common stock in the subscription or community offering after you send us your order.
 
Orders and funds submitted or automatic withdrawals authorized in connection with a purchase of shares of common stock in the subscription and community offerings will be held by us until the completion or termination of the conversion and offering, including any extension of the expiration date. Because completion of the conversion and offering will be subject to regulatory approvals and a reconfirmation of the independent appraisal, there may be one or more delays in the completion of the conversion and offering. Orders submitted in the subscription and community offerings are irrevocable, and subscribers will have no access to subscription funds unless the offering is terminated, or extended beyond [ Date 2], 2010, or the number of shares to be sold in the offering is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to less than 11,050,000 shares of common stock.
 
Our return on equity will be low following the stock offering compared to our historical performance. This could negatively affect the trading price of our shares of common stock.
 
Net income divided by average equity, known as return on equity, is a ratio many investors use to compare the performance of a financial institution to its peers. Our return on average equity ratio, annualized, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 7.84% compared to a median return on equity of (2.45)% based on trailing twelve-month earnings for all publicly traded fully converted savings institutions as of December 31, 2009. Following the stock offering, we expect our consolidated equity to be between $258.7 million at the minimum of the offering range and $311.8 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range. Based upon our income for the year ended December 31, 2009 and assuming the sale of shares at the maximum of the offering range, our return on equity would be 3.15%. We expect our return on equity to remain low until we are able to leverage the additional capital we receive from the stock offering. Although we will be able to increase net interest income using proceeds of the stock offering, our return on equity will be negatively affected by higher expenses from the costs of being a fully public company and added expenses associated with expanding our existing employee stock ownership plan and adopting one or more new stock benefit plans. Until we can increase our net interest income and non-interest income and leverage the capital raised in the stock offering, we expect our return on equity to remain low, which may reduce the market price of our shares of common stock.
 
The implementation of one or more new stock benefits plans may dilute your ownership interest.
 
We intend to adopt one or more new stock benefit plans following the conversion and offering, subject to receipt of shareholder approval. These plans may be funded either through open market purchases or from the issuance of authorized but unissued shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial. While our intention is to fund these plans through open market purchases, shareholders would experience a     % reduction in ownership interest at the maximum of the offering range in the event newly issued shares of our common stock are used to fund stock options and shares of restricted stock under the plans in an amount equal to 10.0% and


25


Table of Contents

4.0%, respectively, of the shares sold in the offering. In the event we adopt the plans more than one year following the conversion, the plans will not be subject to certain limitations imposed by Connecticut regulations, including limits on the total number of options or restricted shares available for award under the plans.
 
The expansion of our existing employee stock ownership plan and implementation of one or more new stock benefit plans will increase our compensation and benefit expenses and adversely affect our profitability.
 
We intend to adopt one or more new stock benefit plans after the conversion and offering, subject to shareholder approval, which will increase our annual employee compensation and benefit expenses related to the restricted stock awards and stock options granted to participants under such plans. The actual amount of the additional compensation and benefit expenses will depend on the number of restricted shares and options actually granted under the plans, the fair market value of our shares of common stock at specific points in the future, the applicable vesting periods and other factors which we cannot predict at this time; however, we expect them to be material. If a stock benefit plan is implemented within one year of the completion of the conversion and offering, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance for grants of options and restricted stock awards under such stock benefit plan may not exceed 10.0% and 4.0% of the shares sold in the offering, respectively. If we award options or other stock awards in excess of these amounts under a stock benefit plan adopted more than one year after the completion of the offering, our costs would increase further.
 
In addition, we will recognize expense for our employee stock ownership plan when shares are committed to be released to participants’ accounts (i.e., as the loan used to acquire these shares is repaid), and we would recognize expense for stock options and restricted stock over the vesting period of awards made to recipients. The expense in the first year following the offering has been estimated to be $199,000 ($132,000 after tax) at the maximum of the offering range as set forth in the pro forma financial information under “PRO FORMA DATA,” assuming the $10.00 per share purchase price as fair market value. Actual expenses, however, may be higher or lower, depending on the price of our common stock on the grant date. For further discussion of our proposed stock benefit plans, see “MANAGEMENT — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Share-Based Compensation”.
 
Various factors may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.
 
Our Board of Directors has no current intention to sell control of New Rockville Financial. Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, federal regulations, Connecticut law and various other factors may make it more difficult for companies or persons to acquire control of New Rockville Financial without the consent of our Board of Directors and the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. You may want a takeover attempt to succeed because, for example, a potential acquirer could offer a premium over the then prevailing price of our common stock. The factors that may discourage takeover attempts or make them more difficult include:
 
  •  Connecticut Banking Regulations.   Connecticut banking regulations prohibit, for a period of three years following the completion of a conversion, the direct or indirect acquisition of more than 10.0% of any class of our equity securities without the prior approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner.
 
  •  Certificate of Incorporation.   Provisions of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of New Rockville Financial may make it more difficult and expensive to pursue a takeover attempt that management opposes, even if the takeover is favored by a majority of our shareholders. These provisions also would make it more difficult to remove our current Board of Directors or management, or to elect new directors. Specifically, our certificate of incorporation prohibits for a period of five years following the completion of a conversion, subject to certain limitations, the direct or indirect acquisition of more than 10.0% of any class of our equity securities without the prior approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. Additional provisions include the election of directors to staggered terms of four years, the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors and the requirement that a director may be removed from office only upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office or by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80.0% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote for the election of directors. Our bylaws also contain provisions


26


Table of Contents

  regarding the timing and content of shareholder proposals and nominations and qualification for service on the Board of Directors.
 
  •  Issuance of stock options.   We intend to adopt one or more stock benefit plans no earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion and offering, pursuant to which we will grant stock options to key employees and directors that will require payments to these persons in the event of a change in control of New Rockville Financial. These payments may have the effect of increasing the costs of acquiring New Rockville Financial, thereby discouraging future takeover attempts.
 
  •  Employment and change in control agreements.   Existing Rockville Financial has employment agreements with certain of its executive and other officers that will remain in effect following the stock offering. New Rockville Financial intends to enter into an employment agreement and change in control agreement with its new Chief Executive Officer and new Chief Operating Officer following the stock offering. These agreements may have the effect of increasing the costs of acquiring New Rockville Financial, thereby discouraging future takeover attempts.
 
See “RESTRICTIONS ON ACQUISITION OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL” for more information regarding the factors that may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.
 
There will be a decrease in stockholders’ rights for existing stockholders of Existing Rockville Financial.
 
As a result of the conversion, shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will become Shareholders of New Rockville Financial. Some rights of shareholders of New Rockville Financial will be reduced compared to the rights shareholders currently have in Existing Rockville Financial. The reduction in shareholder rights results from differences between the certificates of incorporation and bylaws of New Rockville Financial and Existing Rockville Financial. The differences between the provisions in the certificates of incorporation and bylaws are not mandated by law, but have been selected by management as being in the best interests of New Rockville Financial and its shareholders. See “COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHTS FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL” for a discussion of these differences.
 
Our contribution to the charitable foundation will adversely affect net income.
 
We intend to contribute cash equal to 3.0% of the net proceeds from the offering to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc., subject to receipt of corporator approval. The contribution will have an adverse effect on our net income for the quarter and year in which we make the contribution to the charitable foundation. The after-tax expense of the contribution will reduce net income by $      million at the maximum of the offering range, assuming that 40.0% of the shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60.0% of the shares will be sold in a syndicated community offering.


27


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARY
 
The summary financial information presented below is derived in part from the consolidated financial statements of Existing Rockville Financial. The following is only a summary and you should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes beginning on page F-1. The information at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements of Existing Rockville Financial that appear in this prospectus. The information at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 is derived in part from audited consolidated financial statements that do not appear in this prospectus. The information at and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is unaudited.
 
                                                 
    At June 30,     At December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
          (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Selected Financial Condition Data:
                                               
Total assets
  $ 1,602,014     $ 1,571,134     $ 1,533,073     $ 1,327,012     $ 1,232,836     $ 1,056,169  
Available for sale securities
    114,047       102,751       141,250       136,372       132,467       129,049  
Held to maturity securities
    16,747       19,074       24,138                    
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    17,007       17,007       17,007       11,168       9,836       8,498  
Loans receivable, net
    1,383,036       1,361,019       1,291,791       1,116,327       1,033,355       859,700  
Cash and cash equivalents
    19,536       19,307       14,901       23,998       22,381       23,611  
Deposits
    1,150,379       1,129,108       1,042,508       951,038       884,511       761,396  
Mortgagors’ and investors’ escrow accounts
    5,175       6,385       6,077       5,568       5,320       4,794  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
    272,501       263,802       322,882       201,741       178,110       130,867  
Total stockholders’ equity
    162,384       157,428       145,777       156,373       155,064       150,905  
Allowance for loan losses
    13,144       12,539       12,553       10,620       9,827       8,675  
Non-performing loans(1)
    14,366       12,046       10,435       1,569       1,493       7,177 (2)
 
 
(1) Non-performing loans include loans for which Rockville Bank does not accrue interest (non-accrual loans), loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest, and loans that have gone through troubled debt restructurings.
 
(2) Balance includes a $4.9 million fully guaranteed United States Department of Agriculture loan that was past due 90 days and still accruing as of December 31, 2005 which was repaid in full in January 2006.
 


28


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Six Months
       
    Ended June 30,     For the Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (In thousands)  
 
Selected Operating Data:
                                               
Interest and dividend income
  $ 37,561     $ 76,062     $ 77,545     $ 73,877     $ 63,952     $ 48,600  
Interest expense
    11,004       29,775       34,946       35,577       27,649       16,514  
                                                 
Net interest income
    26,557       46,287       42,599       38,300       36,303       32,086  
Provision for loan losses
    1,812       1,961       2,393       749       1,681       2,700  
                                                 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    24,745       44,326       40,206       37,551       34,622       29,386  
Non-interest income (loss)
    4,052       6,972       (8,987 )     5,194       4,625       4,076  
Non-interest expense
    19,027       36,631       33,762       30,301       29,025       24,616  
Contribution to charitable foundation
                                  3,887  
                                                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    9,770       14,667       (2,543 )     12,444       10,222       4,959  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    3,452       4,935       (956 )     4,116       3,368       1,533  
                                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 6,318     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328     $ 6,854     $ 3,426  
                                                 
 
                                                 
                                  For the
 
                                  Period
 
                                  May 20,
 
    2010 Six Months
    For the Years Ended December 31,
    2005 to
 
    Ended June 30,     (Dollars in thousands except per share data)     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)  
 
Net income (loss)(1)
  $ 6,318     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328     $ 6,854     $ 1,669  
                                                 
Earnings per share(1)
                                               
Basic
  $ .34     $ 0.53     $ (0.09 )   $ 0.44     $ 0.36     $ 0.09  
                                                 
Diluted
  $ .34     $ 0.53     $ (0.09 )   $ 0.44     $ 0.36     $ 0.09  
                                                 
Dividends per share
  $ .12     $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.16     $ 0.08     $  
                                                 
 
 
(1) The earnings for the period prior to the mutual holding company reorganization which was completed on May 20, 2005, were excluded when calculating the earnings per share since shares of common stock were not issued until May 20, 2005.
 

29


Table of Contents

                                                 
    At or
   
    for the
   
    Six
   
    Months
   
    Ended
   
    June 30,   At or for the Years Ended December 31,
    2010   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
 
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
                                               
Performance Ratios:
                                               
Return on average assets
    0.80 %     0.63 %     (0.11 )%     0.65 %     0.59 %     0.36 %
Return on average equity
    7.84       6.44       (1.03 )     5.32       4.42       2.88  
Interest rate spread(1)
    3.23       2.73       2.63       2.52       2.75       3.10  
Net interest margin(2)
    3.53       3.10       3.09       3.13       3.30       3.49  
Non-interest expense to average assets
    2.42       2.36       2.35       2.37       2.52       2.95  
Efficiency ratio(3)
    62.16       68.78       100.45       69.67       70.92       78.82  
Efficiency ratio, excluding foundation contribution
    62.16       68.78       100.45       69.67       70.92       68.07  
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
    120.36       118.55       118.50       120.77       122.01       121.51  
Dividend payout ratio(4)
    0.36       0.38             0.36       0.22        
Asset Quality Ratios:
                                               
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans
    0.94       0.91       0.96       0.94       0.94       1.00  
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans
    91.49       104.09       120.30       676.86       658.20       120.87 (5)
Net charge-offs to average loans
    0.09       0.16       0.04       0.00       0.05       0.05  
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans
    1.03       0.88       0.80       0.14       0.14       0.83  
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets
    1.08       .96       0.68       0.12       0.12       0.68  
Capital Ratios:
                                               
Capital to total assets at end of period
    10.1       10.0       9.5       11.8       12.6       14.3  
Average capital to average assets
    10.3       9.7       10.8       12.3       13.5       12.4  
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
    14.0       14.1       14.2       16.6       18.0       20.4  
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets
    12.9       13.0       12.9       15.5       16.9       19.3  
Tier I capital to total average assets
    10.3       10.1       10.4       11.7       12.8       14.3  
Other Data:
                                               
Number of full service offices
    18       18       17       16       14       13  
Number of limited service offices
    4       4       4       4       4       4  
 
 
(1) Represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(2) Represents (annualized) net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets.
 
(3) Represents (annualized) non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
 
(4) Represents the amount of dividends paid as a percentage of net income.
 
(5) The ratio at December 31, 2005 is 380.48 when excluding the $4.9 million fully guaranteed United States Department of Agriculture loan that was past due 90 days and still accruing as of December 31, 2005, which was repaid in full in January, 2006.

30


Table of Contents

 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could cause our results to differ materially from those set forth in such forward-looking statements.
 
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “targeted” and similar expressions, and future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may” are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual conditions, events or results may differ materially from those contemplated by a forward-looking statement. Factors that could cause this difference — many of which are beyond our control — include without limitation the following:
 
  •  Local, regional and national business or economic conditions may differ from those expected.
 
  •  The effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s interest rate policies, may adversely affect our business.
 
  •  The ability to increase market share and control expenses may be more difficult than anticipated.
 
  •  Changes in laws and regulatory requirements (including those concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance) may adversely affect us or our businesses.
 
  •  Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by regulatory agencies, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, may affect expected financial reporting.
 
  •  Future changes in interest rates may reduce our profits which could have a negative impact on the value of our stock.
 
  •  We are subject to lending risk and could incur losses in our loan portfolio despite our underwriting practices. Changes in real estate values could also increase our lending risk.
 
  •  Changes in demand for loan products, financial products and deposit flow could impact our financial performance.
 
  •  Our inability to recruit and retain additional high-skilled personnel, in particular the new Chief Executive Officer, could result in disruptions to our business or operations.
 
  •  Strong competition within our market area may limit our growth and profitability.
 
  •  We may not manage the risks involved in the foregoing as well as anticipated.
 
  •  If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.
 
  •  Our stock value may be negatively affected by federal regulations and certificate of incorporation provisions restricting takeovers.
 
  •  Further implementation of our stock benefit plans will increase our costs, which will reduce our income.
 
  •  Because we intend to continue to increase our commercial real estate and commercial business loan originations, our lending risk may increase, and downturns in the real estate market or local economy could adversely affect our earnings.
 
  •  The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) of 2008 has and may continue to have a significant impact on the banking industry. The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010 and is expected to result in dramatic regulatory changes that will affect the industry in general, and impact our competitive position in ways that can’t be predicted at this time.


31


Table of Contents

 
Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us in this Prospectus speak only as of the date of this Prospectus. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made. The reader should; however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature we may make in future filings.
 
HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING
 
Although we are unable to determine what the actual net proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock in the offering will be until the conversion and the offering is completed, we anticipate that the net proceeds will be between $104.7 million and $142.3 million, or up to $163.9 million if the offering range is increased by 15.0%, assuming that 40.0% of the shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60.0% of the shares will be sold in a syndicated community offering.
 
A summary of the anticipated net proceeds at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum of the offering range and of the distribution of the net proceeds is as follows:
 
                                                                 
                Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of              
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    11,050,000 Shares     13,000,000 Shares     14,950,000 Shares     17,192,500 Shares(1)  
          Percent of
          Percent of
          Percent of
          Percent of
 
          Net
          Net
          Net
          Net
 
    Amount     Proceeds     Amount     Proceeds     Amount     Proceeds     Amount     Proceeds  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Gross offering proceeds
  $ 110,500             $ 130,000             $ 149,500             $ 171,925          
Less offering expenses
    5,844               6,540               7,236               8,037          
                                                                 
Net offering proceeds
    104,656       100.0 %     123,460       100.0 %     142,264       100.0 %     163,888       100.0 %
Distribution of net proceeds:
                                                               
Proceeds contributed to Rockville Bank
    52,328       50.0       61,730       50.0       71,132       50.0       81,944       50.0  
Loan to employee stock ownership plan
    4,420       4.2       5,200       4.2       5,980       4.2       6,877       4.2  
Proceeds contributed to foundation
    3,140       3.0       3,704       3.0       4,268       3.0       4,917       3.0  
                                                                 
Proceeds retained by New Rockville Financial(1)
  $ 44,768       42.8 %   $ 52.826       42.8 %   $ 60,884       42.8 %   $ 70,150       42.8 %
                                                                 
 
 
(1) As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares, which could occur due to a 15.0% increase in the offering range to reflect a greater demand for the shares or changes in market or financial conditions following the commencement of the offering.
 
Payments for shares of common stock made through withdrawals from existing deposit accounts will not result in the receipt of new funds for investment but will result in a reduction of Rockville Bank’s deposits. The net proceeds may vary because total expenses relating to the offering may be more or less than our estimates. For example, our expenses would increase if a syndicated community offering were used to sell shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription and community offerings. The above table assumes that 40.0% of the shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60.0% of the shares will be sold in a syndicated community offering.
 
New Rockville Financial May Use the Proceeds it Retains From the Offering:
 
  •  to pay cash dividends to shareholders;
 
  •  to repurchase shares of our common stock;
 
  •  to invest in securities;


32


Table of Contents

 
  •  to loan or provide additional contributions to Rockville Bank;
 
  •  to finance strategic growth opportunities, such as acquisitions of other financial institutions and related banking businesses, although we do not currently have any agreements or understandings regarding any specific expansion or acquisition opportunities; and
 
  •  for other general corporate purposes.
 
New Rockville Financial expects to fund a loan to Rockville Bank’s employee stock ownership plan to purchase up to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering (between $4.4 million and $6.0 million, or $6.9 million if the offering is increased by 15.0%). New Rockville Financial also expects to contribute cash equal to 3.0% of the net offering proceeds to the charitable foundation. Initially, New Rockville Financial intends to invest the proceeds retained in the offering by New Rockville Financial in short-term liquid investments, such as U.S. treasury and government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and cash and cash equivalents. Under Connecticut banking regulations, we may not repurchase shares of our common stock during the first year following the completion of the conversion and the offering, except under limited circumstances, such as to fund tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans or management recognition plans that have been approved by shareholders.
 
Rockville Bank May Use the Net Proceeds it Receives From the Offering:
 
  •  to fund new loans and otherwise increase our loan portfolio;
 
  •  to pay off approximately $40.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances that are scheduled to mature between January 2011 and August 2011;
 
  •  to enhance existing products and services and to support the development of new products and services;
 
  •  to invest in securities;
 
  •  to expand its retail banking franchise by acquiring new branches or by acquiring other financial institutions or other banking related companies, although we do not currently have any agreements or understandings with respect to any specific expansion or acquisition opportunities; and
 
  •  for other general corporate purposes.
 
Similar to New Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank initially intends to invest a substantial portion of the proceeds it receives from the offering in short-term liquid investments, such as U.S. treasury and government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and cash and cash equivalents.
 
The use of the proceeds outlined above may change based on changes in interest rates, equity markets, laws and regulations affecting the financial services industry, our relative position in the financial services industry, the attractiveness of potential acquisitions to expand our operations, and overall market conditions.
 
We expect our return on equity to decrease as compared to our performance in recent years, until we are able to reinvest effectively the additional capital raised in the offering. Until we can increase our net interest income and non-interest income, we expect our return on equity to be below the industry average, which may negatively affect the value of our common stock. See “RISK FACTORS — Our failure to effectively deploy the net proceeds may have an adverse impact on our financial performance and the value of our common stock”.
 
OUR DIVIDEND POLICY
 
We have paid quarterly cash dividends since the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006. We currently pay a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share, or $0.24 on an annualized basis. After we complete the conversion, we intend to continue to pay dividends on our outstanding shares of common stock. We expect that the level of cash dividends per share after the conversion and offering will be consistent with the current amount of dividends per share we pay on our common stock, as adjusted for the additional shares issued pursuant to the exchange ratio. For example, based on the current annualized cash dividend of $0.24 per share and an assumed


33


Table of Contents

exchange ratio of 1.3158 at the maximum of the offering range, the annualized cash dividend, if paid, would be $0.18 per share, which represents an annual dividend yield of 1.80% based upon a stock price of $10.00 per share. However, the dividend rate and the continued payment of dividends will depend on a number of factors including our capital requirements, our financial condition and results of operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory limitations, and general economic conditions. We cannot assure you that we will not reduce or eliminate dividends in the future.
 
Under Connecticut law and regulations, Rockville Bank may pay cash dividends out of its net profits. For purposes of this restriction, “net profits” represents the remainder of all earnings from current operations. Further, the total amount of all dividends declared by Rockville Bank in any year may not exceed the sum of its net profits for the year in question combined with its retained net profits from the preceding two years. Federal law also prevents Rockville Bank from paying dividends or making other capital distributions that, if by doing so, would cause it to become “undercapitalized.” The FDIC may limit Rockville Bank’s ability to pay dividends. For information concerning additional federal and state law and regulations regarding the ability of Rockville Bank to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends to Existing Rockville Financial, see “SUPERVISION AND REGULATION”.
 
Unlike Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial is not restricted by the FDIC’s regulations on the payment of dividends to its shareholders, although the source of dividends will depend on the net proceeds retained by us and earnings thereon, and dividends from Rockville Bank. Pursuant to Connecticut banking regulations, during the three-year period following the conversion and the offering, we will not take any action to declare an extraordinary dividend to shareholders, and no dividend will be paid to our shareholders if such dividends would reduce our stockholders’ equity below the amount of the liquidation account required to be established in connection with the conversion. In addition, New Rockville Financial will be subject to state law limitations on the payment of dividends. Connecticut law generally restricts dividends from being made if we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course or our total assets would be less than our total liabilities plus any payments that would be owed upon dissolution to our shareholders whose preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the dividend.
 
See “SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES” and “MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK” for information regarding our historical dividend payments.
 
MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK
 
Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RCKB”. Upon completion of the conversion, the shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial will replace the shares of Existing Rockville Financial. We expect the new shares will trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RCKBD” for a period of 20 trading days after the completion of the offering. Thereafter, our trading symbol will revert to “RCKB”. New Rockville Financial’s name will also be changed upon completion of the conversion and the offering to “Rockville Financial, Inc.” In order to list our stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we are required to have at least three broker-dealers who will make a market in our common stock. Existing Rockville Financial currently has more than three market makers, including Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. has advised us that it intends to make a market in our common stock following the offering, but it is under no obligation to do so.
 
The development of a public market having the desirable characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the existence of willing buyers and sellers, the presence of which is not within our control or that of any market maker. There can be no assurance that persons purchasing the common stock will be able to sell their shares at or above the $10.00 price per share in the offering. Purchasers of our common stock should have a long-term investment intent.
 
The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices for shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock and cash dividends paid per share for the periods indicated. As of June 30, 2010, there were


34


Table of Contents

8,163,862 publicly held shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock issued and outstanding (excluding shares held by Rockville Financial MHC). In connection with the conversion, each existing publicly held share of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial will be converted into a right to receive a number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock, based upon the exchange ratio that is described in other parts of this prospectus. See “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Share Exchange Ratio for Current Shareholders”.
 
At the close of business on August 31, 2010, there were 18,853,112 shares issued and outstanding. The high and low closing prices for the quarterly periods noted below were obtained from NASDAQ Global Select Market.
 
                         
    Price per Share     Cash
 
    High     Low     Dividend Declared  
 
2010
                       
Fourth quarter (through          ,          , 2010)
  $ [     ]     $ [     ]        
Third quarter
    [     ]       [     ]       [     ]  
Second quarter
    12.64       10.50       0.06  
First quarter
    12.42       8.82       0.06  
2009
                       
Fourth quarter
  $ 11.68     $ 9.68     $ 0.05  
Third quarter
    14.79       9.88       0.05  
Second quarter
    12.50       8.44       0.05  
First quarter
    14.46       6.17       0.05  
2008
                       
Fourth quarter
  $ 15.50     $ 8.80     $ 0.05  
Third quarter
    17.00       12.00       0.05  
Second quarter
    14.50       12.51       0.05  
First quarter
    13.88       9.75       0.05  
 
On          , 2010, the business day immediately preceding the public announcement of the conversion, and on          , the closing prices of Existing Rockville Financial common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market were $      per share and $      per share, respectively. At August 31, 2010, Existing Rockville Financial had approximately 3,853 shareholders of record. On the effective date of the conversion, all publicly held shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, including shares of common stock held by our officers and directors, will be converted automatically into and become the right to receive a number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock determined pursuant to the exchange ratio. See “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Share Exchange Ratio for Current Shareholders” and “THE IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY STOCK OWNERSHIP”.
 
Restricted stock and options to purchase shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock will be converted into restricted stock and options to purchase a number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock determined pursuant to the exchange ratio. See “OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS”.


35


Table of Contents

 
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA REGULATORY CAPITAL COMPLIANCE
 
At June 30, 2010, Rockville Bank exceeded all of the applicable regulatory capital requirements and was considered “well capitalized” under prompt corrective action provisions. The table below sets forth the historical equity capital and regulatory capital of Rockville Bank at June 30, 2010, and the pro forma regulatory capital of Rockville Bank, after giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock at a $10.00 per share purchase price and assuming the receipt by Rockville Bank of between $44.6 million and $69.9 million of the net offering proceeds at the minimum and adjusted maximum of the offering range, respectively. The table assumes the receipt by Rockville Bank of 50.0% of the net offering proceeds and that 40.0% of the shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60.0% of the shares will be sold in a syndicated community offering.
 
                                                                                 
    Rockville Bank
    Pro Forma at June 30, 2010, Based Upon the Sale in the Offering of  
    Historical at
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    June 30, 2010     11,050,000 Shares     13,000,000 Shares     14,950,000 Shares     17,192,500 Shares(1)  
          Percent of
          Percent of
          Percent of
          Percent of
          Percent of
 
    Amount     Assets(2)     Amount     Assets(2)     Amount     Assets(2)     Amount     Assets(2)     Amount     Assets(2)  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Equity capital
  $ 152,495       9.64 %   $ 203,668       12.40 %   $ 211,510       12.80 %   $ 219,352       13.20 %   $ 228,370       13.66 %
Total risk-based capital(4)
    165,854       13.20       217,027       17.11       224,869       17.70       232,711       18.30       241,729       18.97  
Total risk-based requirement(3)
    125,622       10.00       126,822       10.00       127,010       10.00       127,198       10.00       127,414       10.00  
                                                                                 
Excess
  $ 40,233       3.20 %   $ 90,205       7.11 %   $ 97,859       7.70 %   $ 105,513       8.30 %   $ 114,315       8.97 %
                                                                                 
Tier 1 (leverage) capital(5)
  $ 152,037       9.61 %   $ 203,210       12.38 %   $ 211,052       12.79 %   $ 218,894       13.19 %   $ 227,912       13.64 %
Tier 1 (leverage) requirement(3)
    63,252       4.00       65,653       4.00       66,029       4.00       66,029       4.00       66,837       4.00  
                                                                                 
Excess
  $ 88,785       5.61 %   $ 137,557       8.38 %   $ 145,023       8.79 %   $ 152,865       9.19 %   $ 161,075       9.90  
                                                                                 
Tier 1 risk-based capital(4)
  $ 152,037       12.10 %   $ 203,210       16.02 %   $ 211,052       16.62 %   $ 218,894       17.21 %   $ 227,912       17.89 %
Tier 1 risk-based requirement
    50,249       4.00       50,729       4.00       50,804       4.00       50,879       4.00       50,966       4.00  
                                                                                 
Excess
  $ 101,788       8.10 %   $ 152,481       12.02 %   $ 160,248       12.62 %   $ 168,015       13.21 %   $ 176,946       13.89 %
                                                                                 
Reconciliation of capital infused into to Rockville Bank:
                                                                               
Net Proceeds
                  $ 52,328             $ 61,730             $ 71,132             $ 81,944          
Add: MHC capital contribution
                    7,685               7,685               7,685               7,685          
Less: ESOP
                    (4,420 )             (4,420 )             (4,420 )             (4,420 )        
Less: Restricted Stock
                    (4,420 )             (4,420 )             (4,420 )             (4,420 )        
                                                                                 
Pro Forma increase in Tier 1 and risk-based capital
                  $ 51,173             $ 60,575             $ 69,977             $ 80,789          
                                                                                 
 
 
(1) As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares that could occur due to a 15.0% increase in the offering range to reflect a greater demand for the shares or changes in market or financial conditions following the commencement of the offering.
 
(2) Tangible and core capital levels are shown as a percentage of total adjusted assets. Risk-based capital levels are shown as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. Pro forma amounts and percentages assume that funds infused into Rockville Bank are invested in assets that carry a 20.0% risk weighting.
 
(3) The current core capital requirement for financial institutions is 4.0% of total adjusted assets for financial institutions that receive the highest supervisory rating for safety and soundness and a 4.0% to 5.0% core capital ratio requirement for all other financial institutions. In addition, the FDIC requires a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater.
 
(4) Pro forma capital levels assume that the employee stock ownership plan purchases 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering with funds we lend. Pro forma GAAP and regulatory capital have been reduced by the amount required to fund this plan. See “MANAGEMENT” for a discussion of our employee stock ownership plan.


36


Table of Contents

 
CAPITALIZATION
 
The following table presents the historical consolidated capitalization of Existing Rockville Financial at June 30, 2010 and the pro forma consolidated capitalization of New Rockville Financial after giving effect to the conversion and offering, based upon the assumptions set forth in the “PRO FORMA DATA” section.
 
                                         
    Pro Forma at June 30, 2010, Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of  
    Existing
                         
    Rockville
                         
    Financial
                      Adjusted
 
    Historical
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Maximum
 
    at June 30,
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    2010     Shares     Shares     Shares     Shares(1)  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Deposits(2)
  $ 1,150,379     $ 1,142,673     $ 1,142,673     $ 1,42,673     $ 1,42,673  
Borrowed funds
    272,501       272,501       272,501       272,501       272,501  
                                         
Total deposits and borrowed funds
  $ 1,422,880     $ 1,415,174     $ 1,415,174     $ 1,415,174     $ 1,415,174  
                                         
Stockholders’ equity:
                                       
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized (post-conversion)(3)
  $     $     $     $     $  
Common stock, no par value, 29,000,000 shares authorized (post-conversion); shares to be issued as reflected(3)(4)
    85,249                          
Paid-in capital(3)
    4,354       190,431       209,235       228,039       249,663  
Retained earnings(5)
    87,027       87,027       87,027       87,027       87,027  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (755 )     (755 )     (755 )     (755 )     (755 )
Plus:
                                       
MHC capital contribution(3)
          7,685       7,685       7,685       7,685  
Less:
                                       
Treasury stock, at cost
    (9,663 )     (9,663 )     (9,663 )     (9,663 )     (9,663 )
After-tax expense of foundation(6)
          (2,072 )     (2,445 )     (2,817 )     (3,245 )
Unearned compensation — ESOP(7)
    (3,828 )     (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Common stock acquired by Restricted Stock Plan
          (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
                                         
Total stockholders’ equity
  $ 162,384     $ 263,813     $ 280,684     $ 297,556     $ 316,958  
                                         
Pro Forma Shares Outstanding
                                       
Total shares outstanding
    18,853,112       18,989,517       22,340,608       25,691,700       29,545,455  
Exchange shares issued
          7,939,517       9,340,608       10,741,700       12,352,955  
Shares offered for sale
          11,050,000       13,000,000       14,950,000       17,192,500  
Total stockholders’ equity as a percentage of total assets(2)
    10.14 %     15.49 %     16.32 %     17.13 %     18.04 %
Tangible equity ratio
    10.07 %     15.43 %     16.26 %     17.07 %     17.99 %
 
 
(1) As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares of common stock that could occur due to a 15.0% increase in the offering range to reflect a greater demand for shares or changes in market or general financial conditions following the commencement of the offering.


37


Table of Contents

 
(2) Does not reflect withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purchase of shares of common stock in the conversion and offering. These withdrawals would reduce pro forma deposits and assets by the amount of the withdrawals. On a pro forma basis, reflects elimination of $7.7 million of cash in Rockville Financial MHC held as deposits of Rockville Bank.
 
(3) Rockville Financial MHC currently has one million authorized shares of preferred stock and 29.0 million authorized shares of common stock, no par value. On a pro forma basis, New Rockville Financial common stock and additional paid-in capital have been revised to reflect the number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock to be outstanding, which is 18,989,517 shares, 22,340,608 shares, 25,691,700 shares and 29,545,455 shares at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum of the offering range, respectively. On a pro forma basis, reflects transfer to equity of $7.7 million of net assets in Rockville Financial MHC.
 
(4) No effect has been given to the issuance of additional shares of New Rockville Financial common stock pursuant to the vesting of restricted stock awards or the exercise of options under a stock benefit plan. If this plan is implemented within the first year after the closing of the offering, an amount up to 4.0% and 10.0% of the shares of New Rockville Financial common stock sold in the offering will be reserved for issuance upon the vesting and exercise of restricted stock and options under the plan, respectively. No effect has been given to the restricted stock or options currently outstanding. See “MANAGEMENT”.
 
(5) The retained earnings of Rockville Bank will be substantially restricted after the conversion. See “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Liquidation Rights” and “SUPERVISION AND REGULATION — Federal Banking Regulation”.
 
(6) Represents the expense of contribution to the charitable foundation based on a 34.0% tax rate. The realization of the deferred tax benefit is limited annually to a maximum deduction for charitable contributions equal to 10% of our annual taxable income, subject to our ability to carry forward for federal or state purposes any unused portion of the deduction for the five years following the year in which the contribution is made.
 
(7) Assumes that 4.0% of the shares sold in the offering will be acquired by the employee stock ownership plan financed by a loan from New Rockville Financial. The loan will be repaid principally from Rockville Bank’s contributions to the employee stock ownership plan. Since New Rockville Financial will finance the employee stock ownership plan debt, this debt will be eliminated through consolidation and no liability will be reflected on New Rockville Financial’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the amount of shares of common stock acquired by the employee stock ownership plan is shown in this table as a reduction of total stockholders’ equity.
 
(8) Tangible equity ratio is a non-GAAP ratio.


38


Table of Contents

 
IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY
STOCK OWNERSHIP
 
The public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in exchange for their shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial pursuant to an exchange ratio. Subject to adjustment, the exchange ratio ensures that the public shareholders will own the same percentage of the common stock of New Rockville Financial after the conversion as they held in Existing Rockville Financial immediately prior to the conversion, without giving effect to new shares purchased in the offering or cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares. However, pursuant to FDIC and Federal Reserve Board policies, the exchange ratio must be adjusted downward to reflect the aggregate amount of Existing Rockville Financial dividends paid to Rockville Financial MHC and the initial capitalization of Rockville Financial MHC. Dividends were paid to Rockville Financial MHC because the Federal Reserve Board’s dividend policy does not permit a mutual holding company to waive dividends declared by its subsidiary. Rockville Financial MHC had assets of $7.685 million as of June 30, 2010, not including Existing Rockville Financial common stock.
 
The adjustments described above will decrease Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders’ ownership interest in New Rockville Financial from 43.30% to 41.81%.
 
In accordance with the process described above, the independent appraiser determined New Rockville Financial’s pro forma market value by adjusting the exchange ratio downward to account for the assets held by Rockville Financial MHC and decreasing the ownership interest held by the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial accordingly.
 
PRO FORMA DATA
 
The following table summarizes historical data of Existing Rockville Financial and pro forma data at and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and at and for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This information is based on assumptions set forth below and in the tables, and should not be used as a basis for projections of market value of the shares of common stock following the conversion and offering. Moreover, pro forma stockholders’ equity per share does not give effect to the liquidation account to be established in the conversion or, in the unlikely event of a liquidation of Rockville Bank, to the tax effect of the recapture of the bad debt reserve. See “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Liquidation Rights”.
 
The net proceeds in the tables are based upon the following assumptions:
 
(i) 40.0% of the shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60.0% of the shares will be sold in a syndicated community offering;
 
(ii) 63,000 shares of common stock will be purchased by our executive officers and directors;
 
(iii) our employee stock ownership plan will purchase 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering, with a loan from New Rockville Financial. The loan will be repaid in substantially equal payments of principal and interest over a period of 30 years;
 
(iv) New Rockville Financial will contribute cash equal to 3.0% of the net offering proceeds to the charitable foundation;
 
(v) Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will receive a fee equal to 0.75% of the dollar amount of shares of common stock sold in the subscription offering and the community offering and 5.5% of the dollar amount of shares sold in the syndicated offering. No fee will be paid to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. with respect to shares of common stock purchased by our qualified and non-qualified employee stock benefit plans, or stock purchased by our officers, directors and employees, and their immediate families; and
 
(vi) total expenses of the offering, including the marketing fees to be paid to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., will be between $5.8 million at the minimum of the offering range and $8.0 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range.


39


Table of Contents

We calculated pro forma consolidated net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as if the estimated net proceeds we received had been invested at the beginning of the applicable period at an assumed interest rate of 1.79% (1.18% on an after-tax basis), which represented the yield on the five-year Treasury Bond as of June 30, 2010. This method reflects the approximate use of proceeds anticipated by New Rockville Financial. The effect of withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purchase of shares of common stock has not been reflected. Historical and pro forma per share amounts have been calculated by dividing historical and pro forma amounts by the indicated number of shares of common stock. No effect has been given in the pro forma stockholders’ equity calculations for the assumed earnings on the net proceeds.
 
The pro forma table gives effect to the implementation of one or more stock benefit plans. Subject to the receipt of shareholder approval, we have assumed that the stock benefit plan will acquire for restricted stock awards a number of shares of common stock equal to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering at a price of $10.00 per share and that such shares of common stock granted under the plans will vest over a five-year period. We have also assumed that the stock benefit plans will grant options to acquire shares of common stock equal to 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering. In preparing the table below, we have assumed that the exercise price of the stock options and the market price of the stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per share and that the stock options had a term of five years and vested over five years. We applied the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate a grant-date fair value of $4.07 for each option. Finally, we assumed that 25.0% of the stock options were non-qualified options granted to directors, resulting in a tax benefit (at an assumed tax rate of 34%) for a deduction equal to the grant date fair value of the options.
 
We may grant restricted stock or options under a stock benefit plan in excess of 4.0% and 10.0%, respectively, of the shares sold in the offering if the stock benefit plan is adopted more than 12 months following the stock offering. In addition, we may grant options that vest sooner than over a five-year period if the stock benefit plan is adopted more than 12 months following the stock offering.
 
The pro forma table also gives effect to the estimated after-tax expense associated with the cash contribution to the charitable foundation. The pro forma data assumes that we will realize 100.0% of the income tax benefit as a result of the contribution to the foundation based on a 34.0% tax rate. The realization of the tax benefit is limited annually to 10% of our annual taxable income. However for federal and state tax purposes, we can carry forward any unused portion of the deduction for five years following the year in which the contribution is made.
 
The pro forma net income does not give effect to the non-recurring expense that will be recognized in 2010 as a result of the contribution to the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. The following table shows the estimated after-tax expense associated with the contribution to the foundation, as well as pro forma net income and pro forma net income per share assuming the contribution to the foundation was expensed for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
 
                                 
                      15% Above
 
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Maximum
 
    of Offering
    of Offering
    of Offering
    of Offering
 
    Range     Range     Range     Range  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  
After-tax expense of contribution to foundation:
                               
Period ended June 30, 2010
  $ (2,072 )   $ (2,445 )   $ (2,817 )   $ (3,245 )
                                 
Pro forma net income:
                               
Period ended June 30, 2010
  $ 4,087     $ 3,680     $ 3,274     $ 2,807  
                                 
Pro forma net income per share:
                               
Period ended June 30, 2010
  $ 0.22     $ 0.16     $ 0.14     $ 0.10  
                                 


40


Table of Contents

As discussed under “HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING,” we intend to contribute cash equal to 3.0% of the net proceeds from the stock offering to the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. and at least 50.0% of the net proceeds to Rockville Bank. We will use a portion of the proceeds we retain for the purpose of making a loan to the employee stock ownership plan, and retain the rest of the proceeds for future use.
 
The pro forma table does not give effect to:
 
  •  withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purpose of purchasing shares of common stock in the stock offering;
 
  •  our results of operations after the stock offering; or
 
  •  changes in the market price of the shares of common stock after the stock offering.
 
The following pro forma information may not represent the financial effects of the stock offering at the date on which the stock offering actually occurs and you should not use the table to indicate future results of operations. Pro forma stockholders’ equity represents the difference between the stated amount of our assets and liabilities, computed in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We did not increase or decrease stockholders’ equity to reflect the difference between the carrying value of loans and other assets and their market value. Pro forma stockholders’ equity is not intended to represent the fair market value of the shares of common stock and may be different than the amounts that would be available for distribution to shareholders if we liquidated. Pro forma stockholders’ equity does not give effect to the impact of intangible assets or the liquidation account we will establish in the conversion in the unlikely event we are liquidated.
 
                                 
    At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
    Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of  
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    Shares     Shares     Shares     Shares  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
Gross proceeds of offering
  $ 110,500     $ 130,000     $ 149,500     $ 171,925  
Plus: market value of shares issued in the exchange
    79,395       93,406       107,417       123,530  
                                 
Pro forma market capitalization
  $ 189,895     $ 223,406     $ 256,917     $ 295,455  
                                 
Gross proceeds of offering
    110,500       130,000       149,500       171,925  
Less: Expenses
    5,844       6,540       7,236       8,037  
                                 
Estimated Net Proceeds
    104,656       123,460       142,264       163,888  
Less: Common stock purchased by employee stock ownership plan
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Less: Cash contribution to charitable foundation
    (3,140 )     (3,704 )     (4,268 )     (4,917 )
Less: common stock purchased by the RRP
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Plus: MHC cash contribution
    7,706       7,706       7,706       7,706  
                                 
Estimated net proceeds, as adjusted
  $ 100,382     $ 117,062     $ 133,742     $ 152,923  
                                 
Consolidated Net Income:
                               
Historical
  $ 6,318     $ 6,318     $ 6,318     $ 6,318  
Pro forma income on net proceeds
    593       692       790       903  
Pro forma employee stock ownership plan adjustment
    (49 )     (57 )     (66 )     (76 )
Pro forma RRP adjustment
    (292 )     (343 )     (395 )     (454 )
Pro forma stock option plan adjustment
    (412 )     (484 )     (557 )     (640 )
                                 


41


Table of Contents

                                 
    At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
    Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of  
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    Shares     Shares     Shares     Shares  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
Pro forma net income
  $ 6,158     $ 6,126     $ 6,090     $ 6,051  
                                 
Per share net income (reflects ASC 260-10-55)
                               
Historical
  $ 0.34     $ 0.29     $ 0.25     $ 0.22  
Pro forma income on net proceeds
    0.03       0.03       0.03       0.03  
Pro forma employee stock ownership plan adjustment
                       
Pro forma RRP adjustment
    (0.02 )     (0.02 )     (0.02 )     (0.02 )
Pro forma stock option plan adjustment
    (0.02 )     (0.02 )     (0.02 )     (0.02 )
                                 
Pro forma net income per share
  $ 0.33     $ 0.28     $ 0.24     $ 0.21  
                                 
Stock price as a multiple of pro forma earnings per share
    15.15       17.86       20.83       23.81  
                                 
Shares used for calculating pro forma earnings per share
    18,554,884       21,829,275       25,103,667       28,869,217  
                                 

42


Table of Contents

                                 
    At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
    Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of  
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    Shares     Shares     Shares     Shares  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
Stockholders’ equity:
                               
Historical
    162,384       162,384       162,384       162,384  
Estimated net proceeds
    104,656       123,460       142,264       163,888  
Plus: MHC capital contribution
    7,685       7,685       7,685       7,685  
Plus: tax benefit of contribution to charitable foundation
    1,068       1,259       1,451       1,672  
Less: common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Less: common stock acquired by RRP
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Less: expense of contribution to charitable foundation
    (3,140 )     (3,704 )     (4,268 )     (4,917 )
                                 
Pro forma stockholders’ equity
    263,813       280,684       297,556       316,958  
Intangible assets
    (1,149 )     (1,149 )     (1,149 )     (1,149 )
                                 
Pro forma tangible stockholders’ equity
  $ 262,664     $ 279,535     $ 296,407     $ 315,809  
                                 
Stockholders’ equity per share:
                               
Historical
  $ 8.55     $ 7.26     $ 6.31     $ 5.48  
Estimated net proceeds
    5.51       5.53       5.54       5.55  
Plus: MHC capital contribution
    0.40       0.34       0.30       0.26  
Plus: tax benefit of contribution to charitable foundation
    0.06       0.06       0.06       0.06  
Less: common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
    (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )
Less: common stock acquired by RRP
    (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )
Less: expense of contribution to charitable foundation
    (0.17 )     (0.17 )     (0.17 )     (0.17 )
                                 
Pro forma stockholders’ equity per share
    13.89       12.56       11.58       10.72  
Intangible assets
    (0.06 )     (0.05 )     (0.04 )     (0.04 )
                                 
Pro forma tangible stockholders’ equity per share
  $ 13.83     $ 12.51     $ 11.54     $ 10.68  
                                 
Offering price as percentage of equity per share
    71.99 %     79.62 %     86.36 %     93.28 %
                                 
Offering price as percentage of tangible equity per share
    72.31 %     79.94 %     86.66 %     93.63 %
                                 
Shares used for pro forma stockholders’ equity per share
    18,989,517       22,340,608       22,691,700       29,545,455  
                                 
 

43


Table of Contents

                                 
    At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
 
    Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of  
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    Shares     Shares     Shares     Shares  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
Gross proceeds of offering
  $ 110,500     $ 130,000     $ 149,500     $ 171,925  
Plus: market value of shares issued in the exchange
    79,395       93,406       107,417       123,530  
                                 
Pro forma market capitalization
  $ 189,895     $ 223,406     $ 256,917     $ 295,455  
                                 
Gross proceeds of offering
  $ 110,500     $ 130,000     $ 149,500     $ 171,925  
Less: Expenses
    5.844       6,540       7,236       8,037  
                                 
Estimated Net Proceeds
    104,656       123,460       142,264       163,888  
Less: Common stock purchased by employee stock ownership plan
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Less: Cash contribution to charitable foundation
    (3,140 )     (3,704 )     (4,268 )     (4,917 )
Less: common stock purchased by the RRP
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Plus: MHC cash contribution
    7,706       7,706       7,706       7,706  
                                 
Estimated net proceeds, as adjusted
  $ 100,382     $ 117,062     $ 133,742     $ 152,923  
                                 
Consolidated Net Income:
                               
Historical
  $ 9,732     $ 9,732     $ 9,732     $ 9,732  
Pro forma income on net proceeds
    1,186       1,383       1,580       1,807  
Pro forma employee stock ownership plan adjustment
    (97 )     (114 )     (132 )     (151 )
Pro forma RRP adjustment
    (583 )     (686 )     (789 )     (908 )
Pro forma stock option plan adjustment
    (823 )     (968 )     (1,113 )     (1,281 )
Pro forma net income
    9,415       9,347       9,278       9,199  
Per share net income (reflects ASC 260-10-55)
                               
Historical
    0.53       0.45       0.39       0.34  
Pro forma income on net proceeds
    0.06       0.06       0.06       0.06  
Pro forma employee stock ownership plan adjustment
    (0.01 )     (0.01 )     (0.01 )     (0.01 )
Pro forma RRP adjustment
    (0.03 )     (0.03 )     (0.03 )     (0.03 )
Pro forma stock option plan adjustment
    (0.04 )     (0.04 )     (0.04 )     (0.04 )
                                 
Pro forma net income per share
  $ 0.51     $ 0.43     $ 0.37     $ 0.32  
                                 
Stock price as a multiple of pro forma earnings per share
    19.61       23.26       27.03       31.25  
                                 
Shares used for calculating pro forma earnings per share
    18,562,250       21,837,941       25,113,633       28,880,678  
                                 

44


Table of Contents

                                 
    At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
 
    Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 per Share of  
    Minimum
    Midpoint
    Maximum
    Adjusted Maximum
 
    11,050,000
    13,000,000
    14,950,000
    17,192,500
 
    Shares     Shares     Shares     Shares  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
Stockholders’ equity:
                               
Historical
  $ 157,428     $ 157,428     $ 157,428     $ 157,428  
Estimated net proceeds
    104,656       123,460       142,264       163,888  
Plus: MHC capital contribution
    7,685       7,685       7,685       7,685  
Plus: tax benefit of contribution to charitable foundation
    1,068       1,259       1,451       1,672  
Less: common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Less: common stock acquired by RRP
    (4,420 )     (5,200 )     (5,980 )     (6,877 )
Less: expense of contribution to charitable foundation
    (3,140 )     (3,704 )     (4,268 )     (4,917 )
                                 
Pro forma stockholders’ equity
    258,857       275,728       292,600       312,002  
Intangible assets
    (1,070 )     (1,070 )     (1,070 )     (1,070 )
                                 
Pro forma tangible stockholders’ equity
  $ 257,787     $ 274,658     $ 291,530     $ 310,932  
                                 
Stockholders’ equity per share:
                               
Historical
  $ 8.29     $ 7.04     $ 6.12     $ 5.32  
Estimated net proceeds
    5.51       5.53       5.54       5.55  
Plus: MHC capital contribution
    0.40       0.34       0.30       0.26  
Plus: tax benefit of contribution to charitable foundation
    0.06       0.06       0.06       0.06  
Less: common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
    (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )
Less: common stock acquired by RRP
    (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )     (0.23 )
Less: expense of contribution to charitable foundation
    (0.17 )     (0.17 )     (0.17 )     (0.17 )
                                 
Pro forma stockholders’ equity per share
    13.63       12.34       11.39       10.56  
Intangible assets
    (0.06 )     (0.05 )     (0.04 )     (0.04 )
                                 
Pro forma tangible stockholders’ equity per share
  $ 13.57     $ 12.29     $ 11.35     $ 10.52  
                                 
Offering price as a percentage of equity per share
    73.37 %     81.04 %     87.80 %     94.70 %
                                 
Offering price as a percentage of tangible equity per share
    73.69 %     81.37 %     88.11 %     95.06 %
                                 
Shares used for pro forma stockholders’ equity per share
    18,989,517       22,340,608       25,691,700       29,545,455  
                                 

45


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Overview
 
Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. is a state-chartered mid-tier stock holding company formed on December 17, 2004. Rockville Financial MHC holds 56.7% percent of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock, and Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. holds of all the common stock of Rockville Bank. Rockville Bank provides a full range of banking services to consumer and commercial customers through its main office in Rockville, 20 1 / 2 other branches located in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut and 42 ATMs, including 13 stand-alone ATM facilities. The “1/2” branch refers to an “in school” branch located at South Windsor High School in South Windsor, Connecticut, which only serves the school’s students, faculty and administrative staff and is not open to the general public. Rockville Bank’s deposits are insured under the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the FDIC.
 
We strive to remain a leader in meeting the financial service needs of the local community and to provide quality service to the individuals and businesses in the market areas that we have served since 1858. We are a community-oriented provider of traditional banking products and services to business organizations and individuals, offering products such as residential and commercial real estate loans, consumer loans and a variety of deposit products. Our business philosophy is to remain a community-oriented franchise and continue to focus on providing superior customer service to meet the financial needs of the communities in which we operate.
 
Our Business Strategy
 
Our goal is to continue to operate and grow as an independent, well capitalized, profitable and competitive financial institution.
 
Highlights of our business strategy are as follows:
 
Remaining an Independent Community-Oriented Institution.   We were established in Rockville, Connecticut in 1858, and we have been operating continuously since that time. We have been, and continue to be, committed to meeting the financial needs of the communities in which we operate. Our focus will be to reinvest the proceeds of the offering consistent with our historical, community-oriented focus and to remain an independent institution.
 
Continuing our Emphasis on One-to-Four Family Residential Real Estate Lending.   Historically, our principal lending activity has been the origination of first mortgage loans for the purchase or refinancing of one-to-four family residential real estate. We will continue to emphasize this business. As of June 30, 2010 residential mortgage loans, including one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit, represented $747.4 million, or 53.6% of our loan portfolio. In furtherance of this strategy, in 2009 we established Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc. to expand our mortgage origination capabilities.
 
Continuing our Emphasis on Commercial Real Estate Lending.   More recently, we have placed an emphasis on commercial real estate lending within and outside our market area. Commercial real estate loans totaled $449.5 million, or 32.2% of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2010. In 2005, we introduced a regional commercial real estate lending program that provides permanent and construction to permanent loans to qualified borrowers with properties located in New England, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. The commercial real estate portfolio had $157.1 million in loans outstanding under our regional commercial real estate lending program as of June 30, 2010.
 
Increasing our Emphasis on Commercial Business Lending.   Commercial business loans totaled $127.8 million, or 9.2% of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2010. Although we have engaged in commercial lending for a number of years, and our commercial lending portfolio has increased in recent years, we plan to increase our commercial lending as a percentage of total loans. The capital raised in the


46


Table of Contents

offering will enable us to expand our commercial lending capacity, in part through the hiring of additional commercial lending personnel.
 
Expanding our Banking Franchise.   Our growth in recent years has been achieved through expansion of our branch network and taking advantage of consolidations in our market place. Rockville Bank opened new branch offices in Glastonbury in 2005, in South Glastonbury in 2006, in Enfield and East Windsor in 2007, in Colchester in 2008 and in Manchester and South Windsor in 2009. We expect to continue to expand our banking franchise in the next few years through de novo branching, and, on an opportunistic basis, through available acquisition opportunities. The additional capital raised in the offering will provide support for further growth and allow for capital improvements to be made to certain branches already a part of our franchise.
 
Growing our Deposit Base.   We continue to offer a variety of deposit products to our customers and to promote competitive rate deposit accounts to individuals and businesses in our market area. We plan to grow our deposit base by taking advantage of financial institution consolidations in our market area, and in particular, acquisitions of banks in our market area by financial institutions headquartered outside of the market.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The accounting policies followed by us conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies, which involve the most complex subjective decisions or assessments, relate to allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, income taxes, pension and other post-retirement benefits and share-based compensation. The following is a description of our critical accounting policies and an explanation of the methods and assumptions underlying their application.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses:   The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses which is charged against income. Management believes the policy is critical because determination of the amount of the allowance involves significant judgments and assumptions.
 
Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and presents the evaluation to both the Board of Director’s Lending Committee and the Board of Directors. In addition, the credit department of Rockville Bank is responsible for the accuracy of loan risk ratings and prepares an asset quality report on a quarterly basis and provides summary reports to the Lending Committee on a monthly basis. A variety of factors are considered in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, historical loss and charge off data, current economic conditions, historical and current delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of our borrowers, results of internal and external loan reviews and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates by management that may be susceptible to significant change.
 
The analysis has three components: specific, general and unallocated allowances. The specific allowance relates to loans classified as impaired where an allowance is measured by determining an expected shortfall in collection or, for collateral-dependent loans, the shortfall of the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses compared to the outstanding loan balance. These loans include those in non-accrual status, restructured loans or loans which may be collateral dependent. Individual evaluations of cash flow or the fair value of collateral supporting these obligations are performed in order to determine the most probable level of loss or impairment. Based on this analysis, specific reserves are assigned to the impaired loan and are incorporated in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses.


47


Table of Contents

The general allowance is determined by segregating the remaining loans by type of loan, risk weighting (if applicable) and payment history. The unallocated allowance represents the results of an analysis that measures the probable losses inherent in each portfolio. Homogenous loan pools are determined by loan type and are comprised of: 1) residential first mortgages, 2) commercial real estate mortgages, 3) residential second mortgages, 4) commercial loans, 5) construction loans, 6) Small Business Administration and United States Department of Agriculture guaranteed loans, as well as, smaller loan pools consisting of unsecured consumer loans, collateral loans and auto loans. Each of these loan types is evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine historical loss rates; delinquency; growth and composition trends within the portfolio; the impact of management and underwriting changes; shifts in risk ratings; and regional and economic conditions influencing portfolio performance with management allocating loss factors based on these evaluations. This analysis establishes factors that are applied to the loan groups to determine the amount of this component of the allowance.
 
The unallocated allowance represents the results of an analysis that measures the probable losses inherent in each portfolio. If the allowance for loan losses is too low, we may incur higher provisions for loan loss expense in the future resulting in lower net income. If an estimate of the allowance for loan losses is too high, we may experience lower provisions for loan loss expense resulting in higher net income. The unallocated allowance decreased to $61,000 as of June 30, 2010 from $209,000 as of December 31, 2009. The unallocated allowance supports the loss that exists in emerging problem loans that cannot be fully quantified or disposition costs that may be affected by conditions not fully understood at this time. Based on the qualitative assessment of the portfolio and in thorough consideration of non-performing loans, management believes that the allowance for loan losses properly supports the level of associated loss and risk.
 
Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Securities:   On a quarterly basis, securities with unrealized losses are reviewed as deemed appropriate to assess whether the decline in fair value is temporary or other-than-temporary. An assessment is made as to whether the decline in value results from company-specific events, industry developments, general economic conditions, credit losses on debt or other reasons. After the reasons for the decline are identified, further judgments are required as to whether those conditions are likely to reverse and, if so, whether that reversal is likely to result in a recovery of the fair value of the investment in the near term. If it is judged not to be near-term, a charge is taken which results in a new cost basis. Declines in the fair value of available for sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings for equity securities and for debt securities that have an identified credit loss. Losses on debt securities with no identified credit loss component are reflected in other comprehensive income. Held to maturity securities are comprised of U.S. government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities with no unrealized losses at June 30, 2010. Management believes the policy for evaluating securities for other-than-temporary impairment is critical because it involves significant judgments by management and could have a material impact on our net income.
 
Income Taxes:   We recognize income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by an allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
In 1998, we created and have since maintained a “passive investment company” (“PIC”), as permitted by Connecticut law. At June 30, 2010 there were no material uncertain tax positions related to federal and state income tax matters. We are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities for the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2009. If the state taxing authority were to determine that the PIC was not in compliance with statutory requirements, a material amount of taxes could be due. As of June 30, 2010, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. As of June 30, 2010, our net deferred tax asset was $10.5 million and there was no valuation allowance.


48


Table of Contents

Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits:   We have a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits for substantially all employees hired before January 1, 2005 who meet certain requirements as to age and length of service. The benefits are based on years of service and average compensation, as defined in the plan. Our funding policy is to contribute annually the maximum amount that could be deducted for federal income tax purposes, while meeting the minimum funding standards established by the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974.
 
In addition to providing pension benefits, we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Participants or eligible employees hired before March 1993 become eligible for the benefits if they retire after reaching age 62 with five or more years of service. A fixed percent of annual costs are paid depending on length of service at retirement. We accrue for the estimated costs of these other post-retirement benefits through charges to expense during the years that employees render service. We make contributions to cover the current benefits paid under this plan. Management believes the policy for determining pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses is critical because judgments are required with respect to the appropriate discount rate, rate of return on assets, salary increases and other items. Management reviews and updates the assumptions annually. If our estimate of pension and post-retirement expense is too low we may experience higher expenses in the future, reducing our net income. If our estimate is too high, we may experience lower expenses in the future, increasing our net income.
 
Stock-based Compensation:   We account for stock options and restricted stock based on the grant date fair value of the award. These compensation costs are recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). We expense the grant date fair value of our stock options and restricted stock with a corresponding increase in equity or a liability, depending on whether the instruments granted satisfy the equity or liability classification criteria. We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value stock options. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the estimated fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life, expected dividend rate, risk-free interest rate and expected forfeiture rate. We develop estimates based on historical data and market information which can change significantly over time.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:   For a discussion of Recent Accounting Pronouncements, see “CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 3 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements”.
 
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
 
Summary:   Total assets increased $30.9 million, or 2.0%, to $1.60 billion at June 30, 2010, from $1.57 billion at December 31, 2009, primarily due to a $22.0 million, or 1.6%, increase in loans receivable, and an increase of available for sale securities of $11.3 million, or 11.0%, which was partially offset by a reduction of $2.3 million, or 12.2%, in held to maturity securities. Cash and cash equivalents increased $229,000 to $19.5 million at June 30, 2010. In the first quarter of 2009, we began selling residential mortgages in the secondary market to Freddie Mac. During the first six months of 2010, we sold $26.1 million of loans originated for sale in the secondary market. At June 30, 2010, there were no loans held for sale.
 
Deposits increased $21.3 million, or 1.9%, from December 31, 2009, to $1.15 billion at June 30, 2010. Interest-bearing deposits grew $14.4 million in the first six months of 2010 to $993.0 million from $978.6 million at December 31, 2009. Non-interest-bearing deposits totaled $157.4 million at June 30, 2010, an increase of $6.9 million from the year end 2009. Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased $8.7 million, or 3.3%, to $272.5 million at June 30, 2010 from $263.8 million at December 31, 2009.
 
Total stockholders’ equity increased $5.0 million, or 3.2%, to $162.4 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $157.4 million at December 31, 2009. This was due to increased retained earnings of $4.1 million, consisting of $6.3 million of net income offset by dividend payments totaling $2.3 million. Also contributing to the increase in equity was an increase in additional paid-in capital of $272,000, a decrease of $278,000 in the accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, and a reduction in unallocated stock held by our employee stock ownership plan totaling $350,000.


49


Table of Contents

Investment Securities:   At June 30, 2010, our investment portfolio of $130.8 million, or 8.2% of total assets, consisted of available for sale securities of $114.0 million and held to maturity securities of $16.7 million. The increase in available for sale securities of $11.3 million from year end was mainly due to the purchase of $22.0 million of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise investments offset by $11.2 million of principal payments of government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities. At June 30, 2010, the available for sale securities portfolio was comprised of $29.2 million in U.S. Government and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities, $4.7 million in corporate bonds, $254,000 in municipal bonds, $65.5 million in U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities and $14.4 million in marketable equity securities. The net unrealized gains on available for sale securities increased $220,000 to $6.3 million at June 30, 2010 from $6.1 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in the net unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale reflects the positive impact that decreasing long-term investment market rates had on the debt securities portfolio during the first six months of 2010. The held to maturity securities portfolio had an amortized cost of $16.7 million comprised of U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities that had a fair market value of $18.1 million at June 30, 2010. Principal payments totaling $2.4 million were made in held to maturity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2010; there were no purchases.
 
Lending Activities:   Net loans receivable increased $22.0 million to $1.38 billion at June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to increases in commercial real estate loans of $23.5 million and commercial business loans of $14.5 million. Residential real estate loans decreased $7.4 million to $747.4 million due to our decision to sell fixed rate residential loans in the secondary market as a result of the historically low market rates. Real estate construction loans decreased $7.3 million to $63.8 million from year end. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, commercial business loans consisted of $21.9 million and $22.8 million, respectively, of loans fully guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture.
 
Deposits:   Deposits increased $21.3 million to $1.15 billion at June 30, 2010 compared to $1.13 billion at December 31, 2009. At June 30, 2010, non-interest-bearing deposits were $157.4 million, an increase of $6.9 million and interest-bearing deposits were $993.0 million, an increase of $14.4 million, compared to December 31, 2009. Money market and investment savings account balances were $240.2 million, an increase of $5.5 million, regular savings and club account balances were $160.5 million, an increase of $16.7 million, and NOW account balances were $111.8 million, an increase of $3.7 million, as compared to December 31, 2009. Certificates of deposit balances were $480.5 million, a decrease of $11.5 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to year end resulting from deposit runoff and lower than average market rates. At June 30, 2010, core deposits were $669.9 million, an increase of $32.7 million compared to December 31, 2009. We have been promoting competitive rate shorter-term time deposits and money market accounts in response to the competition within our marketplace to maintain existing market share and to fund loan growth and reduce borrowings.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources:   We maintain liquid assets at levels we consider adequate to meet our liquidity needs. We adjust our liquidity levels to fund loan commitments, repay our borrowings, fund deposit outflows, pay escrow obligations on all items in the loan portfolio and to fund operations. We also adjust liquidity as appropriate to meet asset and liability management objectives.
 
Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans, the sale in the secondary market of loans held for sale, maturities and sales of investment securities and other short-term investments, periodic pay downs of mortgage-backed securities, and earnings and funds provided from operations. While scheduled principal repayments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, and rates offered by our competition. We set the interest rates on our deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits. In addition, we invest excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements.
 
A portion of our liquidity consists of cash and cash equivalents, which are a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. At June 30, 2010, $19.5 million of our assets were invested in cash and cash equivalents compared to $19.3 million at December 31, 2009. Our primary sources of cash are principal


50


Table of Contents

repayments on loans, proceeds from the calls and maturities of investment securities, increases in deposit accounts, proceeds from residential loan sales and advances from the FHLBB.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net loans receivable increased $22.0 million due to increased levels of commercial real estate and commercial business loans. Total net loan originations declined $8.8 million from the same period in the prior year. We purchased $23.0 million of available for sale investment securities during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Sales of available for sale securities in the first six months of 2010 were $399,000. We received $11.2 million in net principal reductions on available for sale mortgage-backed securities and $2.4 million in principal payments on held to maturity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Calls and maturities of investment securities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $470,000.
 
Liquidity management is both a daily and longer-term function of business management. If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the FHLBB, which provide an additional source of funds. At June 30, 2010, we had $272.5 million in advances from the FHLBB and an additional available borrowing limit of $134.3 million based on collateral requirements of the FHLBB. Internal policies limit borrowings to 30.0% of total assets, or $480.6 million at June 30, 2010.
 
At June 30, 2010, we had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $70.8 million and unfunded commitments under construction loans, lines of credit and stand-by letters of credit of $266.4 million. At June 30, 2010, time deposits scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $305.9 million. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. In the event a significant portion of our deposits are not retained by us, we will have to utilize other funding sources, such as FHLBB advances in order to maintain our level of assets. Alternatively, we would reduce our level of liquid assets, such as our cash and cash equivalents in order to meet funding needs. In addition, the cost of such deposits may be significantly higher if market interest rates are higher or if there is an increased amount of competition for deposits in our market area at the time of renewal.
 
Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
 
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income from earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We also generate non-interest income, including service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage servicing income, bank-owned life insurance income, safe deposit box rental fees, brokerage fees, insurance commissions and other miscellaneous fees. Our non-interest expense primarily consists of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment, service bureau fees, and other non-interest expenses. Our results of operations are also affected by our provision for loan losses.
 
The following discussion provides a summary and comparison of our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
 
Earnings Summary:   From June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010, net income increased by $1.8 million to $6.3 million compared to $4.5 million for the same period the year before. The increase in net income primarily resulted from an increase in net interest income of $4.0 million, which was partially offset by increases in the provision for loan loss expense of $1.2 million, non-interest expense of $208,000 and income tax provision of $1.2 million. The increase in net interest income was due to a reduction of deposit and borrowing expense of $4.8 million and $91,000, respectively, offset by lower interest and dividend income of $877,000. Non-interest income increased by $479,000, the result of earning $720,000 of loan fee income generated by Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc., a net increase of $195,000 in gains on the sale of loans and the absence of additional other-than-temporary impairment charges compared to $357,000 for the same period a year earlier.


51


Table of Contents

Offsetting these improvements was a reduction of $748,000 in securities gains for the period ending in 2010 compared to the same period ending in 2009. Increases of $467,000 in other real estate owned, $239,000 in salary related expense and $200,000 of all other expenses was offset by a decline in FDIC assessment expense of $698,000, accounting for much of the year over year increase in non-interest expense. Income before income taxes increased $3.1 million to $9.8 million in the first half of 2010 from $6.7 million compared to the same period the prior year.
 
Income Statement Summary:
 
                         
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     Change  
    (In thousands)  
 
Net interest income
  $ 26,557     $ 22,564     $ 3,993  
Provision for loan losses
    1,812       603       1,209  
Non-interest income
    4,052       3,573       479  
Non-interest expense
    19,027       18,819       208  
                         
Income before income taxes
    9,770       6,715       3,055  
Income tax provision
    3,452       2,205       1,247  
                         
Net income
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 1,808  
                         
 
Net Interest Income:   Net interest income before the provision for loan loss was $26.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $22.6 million for the same period in 2009. The $4.0 million, or 17.7%, increase in net interest income was primarily due to a $32.4 million, or 14.6%, increase in average net interest-earning assets, in combination with a 50 basis point increase in our net interest margin to 3.53%. Average earning assets increased by $13.1 million, or 0.9%, to $1.5 billion. The increase in the average net interest-earning assets reflected the net impact of continued strong loan growth funded primarily by NOW and money market accounts. Our net interest rate spread increased 58 basis points to 3.23% from 2.65% for the same period in the prior year due to a 74 basis point decline in our average cost of funds partially offset by a 16 basis point decrease in our average earning asset yield resulting from the decline in interest rates.
 
Interest and Dividend Income:   For the six months ended June 30, 2010, interest and dividend income decreased $877,000, or 2.3%, to $37.6 million from $38.4 million for the same period in the prior year. Our interest-earning assets grew $13.1 million while the yield on interest-earning assets decreased 16 basis points to 4.99% from 5.15%. A decline of $33.1 million of average available for sale securities coupled with a 56 basis point decline in yield accounted for a $1.1 million reduction in interest and dividend income. Interest income on loans receivable increased $255,000, or 0.7%, to $35.0 million compared to $34.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in loan interest income was due to growth in average loans for the period of $39.6 million, or 3.0% offset by an 11 basis point reduction on average loan yields.
 
Interest Expense:   Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $4.9 million, or 30.7%, to $11.0 million from $15.9 million compared to six months ended June 30, 2009. The savings resulted from a decrease of 74 basis points paid on average interest-bearing liabilities in combination with a $19.3 million, or a 1.5%, decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in the cost of funds was primarily due to the impact the sustained low interest rate environment had on our time deposits during the first six months of 2010, resulting in expense savings of $4.1 million. Average balances on interest-bearing deposits rose to $987.3 million, an increase of $28.3 million, as the growth in NOW and money market accounts of $50.8 million and savings accounts of $23.5 million offset the reduction of $45.9 million in time deposits. Average outstanding advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were $262.9 million, a decrease of $47.7 million. The interest rate on these borrowings averaged 3.92%, 54 basis points higher than the average rate of 3.38% for the same period in 2009. The increase in the average rate for FHLB borrowings resulted from a reduced use of lower-cost overnight borrowings in the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009.


52


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses:   The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level management determined to be appropriate to absorb estimated credit losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the dates of the financial statements. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and charges any provision for loan losses needed to current operations. The assessment considers historical loss experience, the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. The repayment of these impaired loans is largely dependent upon the sale and value of collateral that may be impacted by current real estate conditions. At June 30, 2010, the allowance for loan losses totaled $13.1 million, which represented 0.94% of total loans and 91.49% of non-performing loans compared to an allowance for loan losses of $13.1 million, which represented 0.98% of total loans and 89.51% of non-performing loans at June 30, 2009.
 
Potential Problem Loans:   We perform an internal analysis of the loan portfolio in order to identify and quantify loans with higher than normal risk. Loans having a higher risk profile are assigned a risk rating corresponding to the level of weakness identified in the loan. All loans risk-rated Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful are listed on our “watchlist” and are reviewed by management on a quarterly basis to assess the level of risk and to ensure that appropriate actions are being taken to minimize potential loss exposure. Loans identified as “Loss” are normally fully charged off. In addition, we maintain a listing of “criticized loans” consisting of Substandard and Doubtful loans which are transferred to the Special Assets area which totaled $29.9 million at June 30, 2010.
 
We closely monitor the watchlist for signs of deterioration to mitigate the growth in non-accrual loans. At June 30, 2010, $14.5 million of commercial loans and $1.0 million of residential and consumer loans were included on the criticized list that were not considered impaired. At December 31, 2009, $15.8 million of commercial loans and $1.5 million of residential and consumer loans were included on the criticized list that were not considered impaired.
 
Non-Interest Income:   We have the following sources of non-interest income: banking service charges on deposit accounts, ATM fees, bank-owned life insurance, mortgage servicing income, loan fee income, sales of investment securities, derivative financial instruments and brokerage and insurance fees from Infinex, Inc., our on-premise provider of non-deposit investment services.
 
Non-interest income increased by $479,000 to $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $3.6 million for the same period in 2009. During 2010, Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc. collected $720,000 in loan fees in its first six months of operations. There were gains from the sale of securities of $188,000 compared to $936,000 of gains in the six months ended June 30, 2009, a reduction of $748,000. ATM fees increased $222,000, the gain on the sale of fixed rate residential mortgage loans increased $195,000, the collection of insufficient funds fees decreased $64,000, and Infinex fees decreased $77,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009. There was no other-than-temporary impairment of securities in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $357,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009.


53


Table of Contents

Non-Interest Expense:   The following table summarizes non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009:
 
                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,        
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)        
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 9,621     $ 9,382     $ 239       2.54 %
Service bureau fees
    1,986       1,972       14       0.71  
Occupancy and equipment
    2,182       2,197       (15 )     (0.67 )
Professional fees
    758       701       57       8.01  
Marketing and promotions
    671       618       53       8.58  
FDIC assessments
    801       1,499       (698 )     (46.56 )
Other real estate owned
    467             467       100.00  
Other
    2,541       2,450       91       3.73  
                                 
Total non-interest expense
  $ 19,027     $ 18,819     $ 208       1.10 %
                                 
 
Non-interest expense increased $208,000, or 1.1%, to $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $18.8 million for the same period in the prior year. Salary and employee benefits expense increased $239,000 which was mainly attributable to increases in salary expense of $844,000, health insurance of $79,000, 401(k) contribution expense of $51,000, employee bonus expense of $38,000, temporary help expense of $30,000 and employee stock ownership plan expense of $29,000 which were offset by reductions in pension and retirement expense of $601,000 and stock incentive awards of $242,000. The increase in the discount rate for the qualified pension plan expense was one of the key reasons for the overall decrease in the 2010 pension and retirement expense. Stock incentive award expense decreased due to the absence of new 2010 incentive awards. Service bureau fees increased $14,000 as the result of higher ATM servicing fees of $11,000 and service bureau fees of $51,000 offset by $48,000 of reductions in wide-area network servicing fees. Occupancy and equipment expense was slightly lower due to reductions in depreciation expense of $71,000 and utilities expense of $25,000 which was offset by increases in maintenance expense of $34,000, rent expense of $23,000 and janitorial service and supplies expense of $27,000. Professional fees increased $57,000 due to increases in consulting fees of $121,000 resulting from additional loan review documentation, possible branch expansion and human resource related issues which were offset by reductions in audit fees of $58,000 and legal fees of $6,000. Marketing and promotions expense increased $53,000 due to an increase in radio and television advertising. The decrease in FDIC assessments resulted from a special assessment of $700,000 incurred in 2009. Other real estate owned expense totaling $467,000 consisted of $135,000 of residential properties and $332,000 of commercial properties. There was no other real estate owned property in the first six months of 2009. Other expense increased $91,000 as shown in the table below.


54


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes significant components of other non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
 
                         
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     Change  
    (In thousands)  
 
Directors fees
  $ 333     $ 397     $ (64 )
Collections
    257       190       67  
Telephone
    110       84       26  
Postage
    211       190       21  
Courier
    156       164       (8 )
Dues and subscriptions
    105       120       (15 )
Mortgage loan servicing
    136       153       (17 )
Mortgage appraisal / credit reports
    152       175       (23 )
Off balance sheet provision expense
    (4 )     (38 )     34  
Printing and forms
    154       172       (18 )
Other
    931       843       88  
                         
Total other non-interest expense
  $ 2,541     $ 2,450     $ 91  
                         
 
Income Tax Provision:   Income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $3.5 million, an increase of $1.2 million from the same period in 2009. Income taxes are provided on an interim basis using the estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 35.3% and 32.8% of pretax income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
 
Summary:   Our total assets increased $38.1 million, or 2.5%, to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2009, as compared to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2008, primarily due to a $69.2 million, or 5.4%, increase in net loans which were funded primarily with the proceeds received from additional deposits of $86.6 million, or 8.3%, which was offset by a $59.1 million reduction of Federal Home Loan Bank advances at December 31, 2009, an 18.3% decrease over December 31, 2008. Total capital increased $11.7 million, or 8.0%, to $157.4 million at December 31, 2009 from $145.8 million at December 31, 2008.
 
Investment Securities:   Available for sale investment securities decreased $38.5 million or 27.3% to $102.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $141.3 million at December 31, 2008. We started purchasing held to maturity securities in 2008 consisting of long term mortgage-backed securities and at December 31, 2009 had $19.1 million in securities held to maturity compared to $24.1 million at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, the net unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale was $4.0 million, net of taxes, compared to $3.6 million as of December 31, 2008. The low interest rate environment during 2009 had a negative effect on the fair value of our LIBOR-based variable rate debt securities during the period. That impact was offset by increased unrealized gains on marketable equity securities.
 
Lending Activities:   Net loans receivable increased $69.2 million, or 5.4%, to $1.4 billion at December 31, 2009 from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2008, primarily due to increases in commercial real estate loans and residential mortgages.
 
Residential real estate loans increased $8.8 million, or 1.2%, to $754.8 million at December 31, 2009. This increase in loans reflected continued demand for loans in a favorable interest rate environment and a no-closing costs loan program for refinanced residential loans offset by the sales of $44.0 million of fixed rate residential loans in the secondary market to Freddie Mac. Commercial real estate loans increased $74.6 million, or 21.2%, to $426.0 million at December 31, 2009. This increase in commercial real estate loans reflects the expansion of existing borrowing relationships and the continued success of the regional commercial real estate lending program.


55


Table of Contents

The allowance for loan losses decreased $14,000 to $12.5 million at December 31, 2009 from $12.6 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses resulted from a $2.0 million provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2009 which equaled net charge-offs. The allowance was deemed adequate based upon management’s estimate of probable estimated loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the growth of the loan portfolio. At December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses represented 0.91% of total loans and 104.1% of non-performing loans, compared to 0.96% of total loans and 120.3% of non-performing loans as of December 31, 2008.
 
Deposits:   Deposits increased $86.6 million, or 8.3%, to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009 from $1.0 billion at December 31, 2008. The growth was principally attributable to a $46.6 million increase in money market and investment savings. Demand deposits grew $34.4 million to $150.5 million at December 31, 2009, up 29.6% over the prior year end. NOW accounts grew $21.2 million to $108.1 million, at December 31, 2009, up 24.3% from the prior year end. Regular savings accounts increased $22.1 million to $143.6 million at December 31, 2009. Time deposits totaled $491.9 million at December 31, 2009, a decrease of $37.6 million, or 7.1%, over the prior year end. The funds generated from the increases in deposits were used to fund loan growth and reduce FHLBB advances during the period.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources:   Liquid assets are maintained at levels considered adequate to meet our liquidity needs. Liquidity levels are adjusted to fund loan commitments, repay borrowings, fund deposit outflows and pay real estate taxes on mortgage loans held for investment. Liquidity is also adjusted as appropriate to meet asset and liability management objectives.
 
Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, advances from the FHLBB, amortization and prepayment of loans, maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments, periodic principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities and earnings and funds provided from operations. Although not currently utilized, we also have available lines of credit with two deposit brokers, as well as, for unsecured federal funds. While scheduled principal repayments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, and rates offered by our competition. Interest rates on deposits are priced to maintain a desired level of total deposits.
 
A portion of our liquidity consists of cash and cash equivalents, which are a product of operating, investing and financing activities. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, $19.3 million and $14.9 million of our assets were invested in cash and cash equivalents. The primary sources of cash are principal repayments on loans, proceeds from the calls and maturities of investment securities, increases in deposit accounts and advances from the FHLBB.
 
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, loan originations and purchases, net of collected principal and loan sales, totaled $78.0 million and $178.0 million, respectively, reflecting continued growth in the loan portfolio due to a favorable interest rate environment, a no-closing cost residential loan program targeted at the refinance market and the use of two established local mortgage banking firms to originate adjustable rate hybrid residential loans. Cash received from the calls and maturities of investment securities totaled $2.5 million and $14.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We purchased $8.1 million and $57.0 million and received proceeds from the sale of available for sale investment securities of $21.2 million and $5.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We started purchasing held to maturity securities in 2008 consisting of long term mortgage-backed securities and at December 31, 2009 had $19.1 million in securities held to maturity compared to $24.1 million at December 31, 2008.
 
Deposit flows are generally affected by the level of our interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by local competitors, and other factors. The net increases in total deposits were $86.6 million and $91.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We experienced increasing deposit levels in 2009 due to new branch promotions and disintermediation from investment firms due to increasing uncertainty in the financial markets and an historically low interest rate environment.
 
Liquidity management is both a daily and a longer-term function of business management. If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the FHLBB, which


56


Table of Contents

provide an additional source of funds. At December 31, 2009, we had $263.8 million in advances from the FHLBB and an additional available borrowing limit of $146.5 million based on collateral requirements of the FHLBB. Our internal policies limit borrowings to 30% of total assets, or $471.3 million at December 31, 2009.
 
At December 31, 2009, we had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $36.7 million and unfunded commitments under lines of credit and stand-by letters of credit of $280.4 million. At December 31, 2009, time deposits scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $359.8 million. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. In the event a significant portion of our deposits are not retained by us, other funding sources will be utilized, such as the FHLBB advances, brokered deposits from two available lines, and an unsecured federal funds line of credit in order to maintain the level of assets. Alternatively, we would reduce the level of liquid assets, such as cash and cash equivalents in order to meet funding needs. In addition, the cost of such deposits may be significantly higher if market interest rates are higher or there is an increased amount of competition for deposits in our market area at the time of renewal.
 
Comparison of Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008
 
The following discussion provides a summary and comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
Income Statement Summary:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     $ Change  
    (In thousands)  
 
Net interest income
  $ 46,287     $ 42,599     $ 3,688  
Provision for loan losses
    1,961       2,393       (432 )
Non-interest income (loss)
    6,972       (8,987 )     15,959  
Non-interest expense
    36,631       33,762       2,869  
                         
Income (loss) before income taxes
    14,667       (2,543 )     17,210  
Income tax provision (benefit)
    4,935       (956 )     5,891  
                         
Net income (loss)
  $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 11,319  
                         
 
Earnings Summary:   We had net income of $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to a net loss of $1.6 million for 2008. When comparing 2009 to 2008, net interest income increased $3.7 million, or 8.7%, the provision for loan losses decreased by $432,000 or 18.1%, and non-interest income increased $16.0 million. Non-interest expense increased by $2.9 million, or 8.5%. In 2009, we earned $0.53 per share on both a basic and diluted earnings per share basis. In 2008, we lost $0.09 per share on both a basic and diluted earnings per share basis.
 
Income before taxes increased $17.2 million to $14.7 million for the year ending December 31, 2009 from a loss before taxes of $2.5 million for the same period in the prior year. Losses from other-than-temporary impairment of securities were $362,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and were the primary change in non-interest income (loss) between both periods. Expenses relating to the issuance of restricted stock and stock options decreased $905,000 to $838,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 when compared to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in restricted stock expense from the prior year reflects the fact that a significant portion of the expense related to the 2008 stock grant, which vests over a four-year period, was accelerated for retirement-eligible officers who had constructively earned the award granted.
 
The increase in net interest income was primarily due to an $18.2 million, or 8.7%, increase in average net interest-earning assets and a one basis point increase in the net interest margin. The $432,000 decrease in


57


Table of Contents

the provision for loan losses from the prior year was attributable to a decrease in the provision deemed necessary as a result of our evaluation of the required allowance amount based upon probable and reasonably estimable losses in our loan portfolio.
 
At December 31, 2008, we had established an allowance for loan losses of $12.6 million that was disbursed between an allocated $11.9 million to cover embedded risk in the homogenous pool evaluation, a $473,000 allocation to $10.1 million portfolio component that was segregated for specific impairment analysis and a $212,000 allocation for imprecision. During 2009, the impaired loans increased from $10.4 million at December 31, 2008 to a high of $15.4 million at September 30, 2009 with the related impairment reserve rising from $473,000 to $1.1 million, respectively. Collateral values were reassessed under current market conditions and the specific impairment allocation in relation to the total principal balance of loans tested rose from 4.70% at December 31, 2008 to 7.20% at September 30, 2009. During this same period, the allocated reserve for the performing pools fell slightly from $11.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $11.4 million or from a 92 basis point allocation to an 85 basis point allocation as some embedded risk was more specifically identified in the rising level of non-performing loans.
 
In the last quarter of 2009 charge-offs in excess of $700,000 were recognized on loans specifically tested for impairment at September 30, 2009. This reduction in conjunction with transfer of a large sub-division loan into other real estate owned during the quarter, significantly reduced the impaired loan total from $15.4 million at September 30, 2009 to $12.0 million at December 31, 2009 and resulted in a lower specific reserve of $381,000 at year-end.
 
At December 31, 2009, allowance for loan losses totaled $12.5 million or 91 basis points of gross loans as compared with 96 basis points at the prior year end. The majority of this decrease was attributable to the homogeneous pool allocation that fell from 92 basis points at December 31, 2008 to 88 basis points at December 31, 2009 as the level of embedded risk migrated to specific non-performance and our subsequent recognition of loss. Management reviewed the factors affecting the homogenous pool allocations and believes that the allocations accurately reflect loss exposure based on current portfolio performance and market conditions.
 
The $16.0 million increase in non-interest income was due to a $14.5 million decrease in the other-than-temporary impairment of securities, a $555,000 increase in gains on sales of securities and a $782,000 increase in gains sales of loans. The program to sell fixed rate residential mortgages in the secondary market began in 2009 driven by historically low mortgage interest rates.
 
The $2.9 million increase in non-interest expense was primarily due to an increase of $1.6 million in FDIC assessments for 2009, an increase of $1.4 million in salaries and employee benefits, and a $277,000 increase in occupancy costs. Expense reductions in professional fees and marketing expenses of $353,000 and $159,000, respectively, were realized.
 
Net Interest Income:   Net interest income before the provision for loan loss increased 8.7% to $46.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $42.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to an $18.2 million, or 8.5% increase in average net interest-earning assets and a one basis point increase in the net interest margin to 3.10% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 3.09% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Average net interest-earning assets increased to $233.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $215.2 million for the prior year.
 
Interest and Dividend Income:   Interest and dividend income decreased 1.9% to $76.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $77.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Interest income on loans receivable increased by 1.5% to $69.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $68.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to an 11.8% increase in average loans receivable which was offset by a 53 basis point decline in the average yield. The average loan yield for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased to 5.21% from 5.74% compared to the same period in the prior year. The prime rate used as an index to re-price various commercial and home equity adjustable rate loans was 3.25%, unchanged from December 31, 2008. Interest and dividend income on securities decreased to $6.5 million for the year ended, December 31, 2009 from $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 attributable to


58


Table of Contents

both a $28.4 million decrease in average securities and a 42 basis point decrease in the average yield on securities for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Interest Expense:   Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased 14.8% to $29.8 million from $34.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in the prior year was attributable to a decline in the weighted-average rate paid due to a falling rate environment offset by an increase in average outstandings. For the year ended December 31, 2009, average interest-bearing liabilities rose 8.2% to $1.3 billion from $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased 63 basis points to 2.37% from 3.00% for the year ended December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, average core deposits increased to $564.2 million from $474.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Provision for Loan Losses:   Management recorded a provision of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $432,000 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 as a result of an evaluation of the loan portfolio and estimated allowance requirements. A significant portion of the decline was due to a decrease in the level of growth during the year. In 2008, total loans increased $178 million while in 2009, total loans increased $70 million. At December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses totaled $12.5 million, or 104.1% of non-performing loans and 0.91% of total loans, compared to $12.6 million at December 31, 2008, or 120.3% of non-performing loans and 0.96% of total loans. We experienced net loan charge-offs of $2.0 million in 2009 compared with net charge-offs of $460,000 in 2008. The increase in loan charge-offs was primarily attributable to two borrowers and the recognition of collateral impairment on two sub-division projects during 2009.
 
Non-interest Income (Loss):   Sources of non-interest income primarily include banking service charges on deposit accounts, Infinex brokerage and insurance fees, bank-owned life insurance and mortgage servicing income. Other-than-temporary impairment of securities are also included in non-interest income (loss).
 
Non-interest income (loss) was $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and included other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $362,000 compared to $14.9 million of other-than-temporary impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2008. Other-than-temporary impairment charges in 2009 were comprised of $297,000 related to five common stocks and $65,000 related to one mutual fund.
 
Service charges and fees increased $90,000 which was primarily comprised of an increase of $294,000 in ATM fees due to increased volume in debit card transactions and a $64,000 increase in safe deposit fees. Service charge fee reductions were recorded in Infinex brokerage and insurance fees of $163,000, overdraft fees of $70,000 and $33,000 in reverse mortgage commissions and fees.
 
Non-interest Expense:   Non-interest expense increased by $2.9 million, or 8.5%, to $36.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $33.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
The following table summarizes non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
 
                                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     $ Change     % Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 18,571     $ 17,150     $ 1,421       8.3 %
Service bureau fees
    3,872       3,808       64       1.7  
Occupancy and equipment
    4,380       4,103       277       6.8  
Professional fees
    1,131       1,484       (353 )     (23.8 )
Marketing and promotions
    1,156       1,315       (159 )     (12.1 )
FDIC assessments
    2,222       654       1,568       239.8  
Other(1)
    5,299       5,248       51       1.0  
                                 
Total non-interest expense
  $ 36,631     $ 33,762     $ 2,869       8.5 %
                                 
 
 
(1) Includes directors’ fees and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 of $769,000 and $829,000, respectively.


59


Table of Contents

 
The $1.4 million increase in salary and employee benefits includes a $1.2 million increase in pension expense, a $443,000 increase in bonuses, offset by an $821,000 decrease in restricted stock compensation expense. The increase in pension costs was the result of higher net periodic benefit costs in 2009 than in 2008 as calculated by our benefit consultant and actuary firm. Bonuses increased in 2009 over 2008 as a result of our loss incurred in 2008 which reduced the payout in 2008.
 
The $821,000 decrease in restricted stock expense from the prior year reflects the fact that a significant portion of the expense related to the 2008 stock grant that vests over a four-year period was accelerated for retirement-eligible officers in 2008 who had constructively earned the award granted.
 
Occupancy and equipment expense increased $277,000, or 6.8%, over the prior year due to increases in rent expense, utilities, property taxes, and depreciation expense on our buildings and furniture and equipment attributable to the June 2008 opening of the new Colchester Branch and January 2009 opening of the Manchester Branch.
 
FDIC assessments expense increased $1.6 million, or 239.8%, in 2009 from 2008 caused by a special assessment of $700,000, increased assessments resulting from a greater level of deposits and higher FDIC assessment rates in 2009.
 
Other non-interest expense increased $51,000, or 1.0%, in 2009 over the prior year. Significant components of other non-interest expense were as follows:
 
                                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     $ Change     % Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Directors fees and expenses
  $ 769     $ 829     $ (60 )     (7.2 )%
Collections
    463       29       434       1,518.9  
Off-balance sheet provision
    (47 )     230       (277 )     (120.4 )
Telephone
    174       202       (28 )     (13.9 )
Postage
    395       383       12       3.1  
Courier
    331       344       (13 )     (3.8 )
Dues and subscriptions
    215       228       (13 )     (5.7 )
Service charges
    188       183       5       2.7  
Printing and forms
    328       431       (103 )     (23.9 )
Other
    2,483       2,389       94       3.9  
                                 
Total other non-interest expense
  $ 5,299     $ 5,248     $ 51       1.0 %
                                 
 
Collection expense was $463,000 in 2009 compared to $29,000 in 2008, an increase of $434,000 due to legal and other third-party costs associated with five commercial loans prior to foreclosure. Off-balance sheet provision declined $277,000, as compared to 2008, due to a reduction of off-balance sheet unfunded commitments for 2009 compared to the total unfunded commitments for 2008. Other expense was $2.5 million in 2009 compared to $2.4 million in 2008, an increase of $94,000, or 3.9%. The increase in 2009 included $60,000 of additional appraisal and credit report expense, $69,000 of other real estate owned expense, of which there was none in 2008, and $46,000 of additional mortgage loan servicing expense. These increases were partially offset by expense reductions in travel expense of $60,000.
 
Income Tax Expense:   Due to net income of $9.7 million in 2009, we had income tax expense of $4.9 million compared to an income tax benefit of $956,000 in 2008. The effective tax rate was 33.6% and 37.6% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rate differed from the statutory rate of 34% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 primarily due to the preferential tax treatment of the corporate dividends received and non-taxable earnings on bank-owned life insurance and municipal investments.


60


Table of Contents

Comparison of Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 to the Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
The following discussion provides a summary and comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
 
Income Statement Summary:
 
                                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Net interest income
  $ 42,599     $ 38,300     $ 4,299       11.2 %
Provision for loan losses
    2,393       749       1,644       219.5  
Non-interest (loss) income
    (8,987 )     5,194       (14,181 )     (273.0 )
Non-interest expense
    33,762       30,301       3,461       11.4  
                                 
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (2,543 )     12,444       (14,987 )     (120.4 )
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
    (956 )     4,116       (5,072 )     (123.2 )
                                 
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328     $ (9,915 )     (119.1 )%
                                 
 
Earnings Summary:   We experienced a net loss of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to net income of $8.3 million for 2007. When comparing 2008 to 2007, net interest income increased $4.3 million, or 11.2%, the provision for loan losses increased by $1.6 million or 219.5%, and non-interest income decreased $14.2 million, or 273.0%. Other non-interest expense increased by $3.5 million, or 11.4%. In 2008, we lost $0.09 per share on both a basic and diluted earnings per share basis. In 2007, basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.44.
 
Income before taxes decreased $15.0 million, or 120.4%, to a loss of $2.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2008 from income before taxes of $12.4 million for the same period in the prior year. When excluding from both periods losses from other-than-temporary impairment of securities and expenses relating to the issuance of restricted stock and stock options, income before taxes would have increased $2.7 million, or 9.1% for the year ending December 31, 2008 when compared to the same period in the prior year. Losses from other-than-temporary impairment of securities were $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007, and were the primary change in non-interest (loss) income between both periods. Expenses relating to the issuance of restricted stock and stock options increased $791,000 to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 when compared to $952,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a $4.6 million, or 2.2%, increase in average net interest-earning assets offset by a four basis point decrease in the net interest margin. The $1.6 million increase in the provision for loan losses from the prior year was attributable to an increase in the provision deemed necessary as a result of our evaluation of the required allowance amount based upon probable and reasonably estimable losses in our loan portfolio. The increase in the provision reflects the decline in economic activity within our market area as evidenced by our increase in non-performing loans to 0.80% of total loans as of December 31, 2008 from 0.14% as of December 31, 2007.
 
The $14.2 million decrease in non-interest income was due to a $14.6 million increase in the other-than-temporary impairment of securities, a $127,000 reduction in gains on sales of securities partially offset by an increase of $594,000 in service charges and fee income. The increase in service charges and fees was primarily comprised of a $311,000 increase in insufficient funds charges as a result of the growth in demand deposit accounts, an increase of $205,000 in ATM fees due to increased volume in debit card transactions and additions made to our ATM network, and an increase in Infinex brokerage fees of $95,000.
 
Net Interest Income:   Net interest income before the provision for loan loss increased 11.2% to $42.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily due to a $4.6 million, or 2.2% increase in average net


61


Table of Contents

interest-earning assets offset by a 4 basis point decrease in the net interest margin. Our net interest margin decreased to 3.09% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 3.13% for the year ended December 31, 2007. Average net interest-earning assets increased to $215.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $210.6 million for the prior year.
 
Interest and Dividend Income:   Interest and dividend income increased 5.0% to $77.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $73.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest income on loans receivable increased by 2.2% to $68.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $67.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily due to a 10.8% increase in average loans receivable which was offset by a 48 basis point decline in the average yield. The average loan yield for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased to 5.74% from 6.22% compared to the same period in the prior year. The prime rate used as an index to re-price various commercial and home equity adjustable rate loans decreased 400 basis points during the year to 3.25% at December 31, 2008 from 7.25% at December 31, 2007. Interest and dividend income on available for sale securities increased to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 attributable to both a 25.1% increase in average available for sale securities and a 55 basis point increase in the average yield on available for sale investment securities for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Interest Expense:   Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased 1.8% to $34.9 million from $35.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year was attributable to an increase in average outstandings offset by a decline in the weighted average rate paid due to a falling rate environment. For the year ended December 31, 2008, average interest-bearing liabilities rose 14.7% to $1.2 billion from $1.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased 51 basis points to 3.00% from 3.51% for the year ended December 31, 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2008, average core deposits increased to $474.4 million from $408.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Provision for Loan Losses:   Management recorded a provision of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $1.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2007 as a result of an evaluation of the loan portfolio and estimated allowance requirements. At December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses totaled $12.6 million, or 120.3% of non-performing loans and 0.96% of total loans, compared to $10.6 million at December 31, 2007, or 676.9% of non-performing loans and 0.94% of total loans. We experienced net loan charge-offs of $460,000 in 2008 compared with net recoveries of $44,000 in 2007. The increase in loan charge-offs was attributable to the decline in our current economic environment.
 
Non-interest Income (Loss):   Sources of non-interest income primarily include banking service charges on deposit accounts, Infinex brokerage and insurance fees, bank-owned life insurance and mortgage servicing income. Other-than-temporary impairment of securities are also included in non-interest income.
 
Non-interest loss was $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and included other than temporary impairment of securities totaling $14.9 million compared to $5.2 million non-interest income earned during the year ended December 31, 2007. Other-than-temporary impairment charges included $11.6 million related to preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, $1.1 million related to a AAA rated pooled trust preferred security, $1.1 million related to eleven common stocks, $587,000 related to one mutual fund and $493,000 related to one AAA rated corporate debt security.
 
Service charges and fees increased $594,000 which was primarily comprised of an increase of $205,000 in ATM fees due to increased volume in debit card transactions and additions made to our ATM network, a $311,000 increase in insufficient funds charges as a result of the growth in demand deposit accounts, and a $95,000 increase in Infinex brokerage fees.
 
Non-interest Expense:   Non-interest expense increased by $3.5 million, or 11.4%, to $33.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $30.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.


62


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
 
                                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 17,150     $ 16,082     $ 1,068       6.6 %
Service bureau fees
    3,808       3,361       447       13.3  
Occupancy and equipment
    4,103       3,594       509       14.2  
Professional fees
    1,484       1,550       (66 )     (4.3 )
Marketing and promotions
    1,315       1,131       184       16.3  
Insurance and FDIC assessments
    798       361       437       121.1  
Other(1)
    5,104       4,222       882       20.9  
                                 
Total non-interest expense
  $ 33,762     $ 30,301     $ 3,461       11.4 %
                                 
 
 
(1) Includes directors’ fees and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 of $829,000 and $755,000, respectively.
 
The $3.5 million increase in non-interest expense was primarily due to an increase of $1.1 million in salaries and employee benefits, a $509,000 increase in occupancy costs and a $437,000 increase in insurance and FDIC assessments. Also contributing to the rise in non-interest expense was a $253,000 increase in off balance sheet provision for credit loss, a $447,000 increase in service bureau fees, and a $184,000 increase in marketing costs.
 
The $1.1 million increase in salary and employee benefits includes a $1.0 million increase in salary costs and a $984,000 increase in restricted stock compensation expense offset by a $234,000 decrease in bonuses, a $190,000 net increase in the amount of loan fees deferred under SFAS 91, a $239,000 decrease in stock option compensation and a $115,000 decrease in expense related to our employee stock ownership plan, when compared to the prior year. The increase in salary costs was primarily due to the growth in the number of full-time equivalent employees, which increased to 219 as of December 31, 2008 from 205 as of December 31, 2007 as a result of the expansion of branch facilities.
 
The $984,000 increase in restricted stock expense from the prior year reflects the fact that a significant portion of the expense related to the 2008 stock grant that vests over a four-year period was accelerated for retirement-eligible officers who had constructively earned the award granted. The decrease of $239,000 in stock option compensation expense when compared to the prior year was primarily due to the immediate recognition of $110,000 of unrecognized stock option compensation expense as a result of a tender offer consummated in 2007 to purchase 43,100 of options issued in the prior year to non-executive officers and $232,000 in expense recorded for a new stock option grant made to executive officers during 2007, as compared to $174,000 of expense recorded for a new stock grant made to executive officers in 2008 and $99,000 in stock option expense for the 2007 and 2006 grants. Stock compensation expense is discussed in detail in Note 14 in the “Share-Based Compensation” footnote in the financial statements.
 
The increase in service bureau fees of $447,000 was primarily due to increases in ATM servicing, core processing services and wide area network costs, due to increases in fees charged by our core processor and additions made to our ATM, branch and wide area network.
 
Occupancy and equipment expense increased $509,000, or 14.2%, over the prior year primarily due to the expansion of our branch and ATM network. This was attributable to an increase of $185,000 for rent expense, an increase of $159,000 in utilities, maintenance contracts and janitorial services and an increase of $167,000 in depreciation expense on our buildings and furniture and equipment. In June 2008, the new Colchester Branch opened contributing the above expense increases.
 
Insurance and FDIC assessments expense increased $437,000, or 121.1%, in 2008 from 2007 caused primarily by a $425,000 increase in FDIC assessments. Increased assessments resulted from a greater level of deposits coupled with a higher FDIC assessment rate.


63


Table of Contents

Other expense increased $882,000, or 20.9%, in 2008 over the prior year. Significant components of other non-interest expense were as follows:
 
                                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Directors fees and expenses
  $ 829     $ 755     $ 74       9.8 %
Telephone
    202       217       (15 )     (6.9 )
Postage
    383       369       14       3.8  
Courier
    344       302       42       13.9  
Dues and subscriptions
    228       235       (7 )     (3.0 )
Service charges
    183       128       55       43.0  
Printing and forms
    431       392       39       9.9  
Other
    2,504       1,824       680       37.3  
                                 
Total other non-interest expense
  $ 5,104     $ 4,222     $ 882       20.9 %
                                 
 
Other expense was $2.5 million in 2008 compared to $1.8 million in 2007, an increase of $680,000, or 37.3%. The increase in 2008 included $253,000 in off balance sheet provision for credit loss expense, $139,000 in Human Resource expense, $109,000 in annual meeting expense, and $80,000 in sales training expense which was partially offset by a reduction of $62,000 in directors’ deferred compensation expense.
 
Income Tax Expense:   Due to the net loss in 2008, we received a tax benefit of $956,000 compared to income tax expense of $4.1 million in 2007. The effective tax rate was 37.6% and 33.1% for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate differed from the statutory rate of 34% for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 primarily due to the preferential tax treatment of the corporate dividends received, non-taxable earnings on bank-owned life insurance and municipal investments offset by the non-deductibility of the excess book basis of employee stock ownership plan expense that was recorded at the average market price for book purposes and is only deductible at cost basis for tax purposes and the non-deductibility of $715,000 of employee benefits expense that exceeded the Federal compensation limit and the impact of the compensation deduction limits.
 
Management of Market and Interest Rate Risk
 
General:   The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of mortgage loans, in general have longer contractual maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has established an Asset/Liability Committee which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. Management monitors the level of interest rate risk on a regular basis and the Asset/Liability Committee meets at least quarterly to review our asset/liability policies and interest rate risk position.
 
We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. During the low interest rate environment that has existed in recent years, we have implemented the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk: (i) emphasizing adjustable rate loans including, adjustable rate one-to-four family, commercial and consumer loans, (ii) reducing and shortening the expected average life of the investment portfolio, and (iii) periodically lengthening the term structure of our borrowings from the FHLBB. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2009, we began selling fixed rate residential mortgages to the secondary market. These measures should serve to reduce the volatility of our future net interest income in different interest rate environments.


64


Table of Contents

Quantitative Analysis:   Simulation analysis is used to estimate our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. It is a dynamic method in that it incorporates our forecasted balance sheet growth assumptions under the different interest rate scenarios tested. We utilize the income simulation method to analyze our interest rate sensitivity position and to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements. At least quarterly, our Asset/Liability Committee reviews the potential effect that changes in interest rates could have on the repayment or repricing of rate sensitive assets and the funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities. Our most recent simulation uses projected repricing of assets and liabilities on the basis of contractual maturities, anticipated repayments and scheduled rate adjustments. Prepayment rate assumptions can have a significant impact on interest income simulation results. Because of the large percentage of loans and mortgage-backed securities we hold, rising or falling interest rates may have a significant impact on the actual prepayment speeds of our mortgage related assets that may in turn effect our interest rate sensitivity position. When interest rates rise, prepayment speeds slow and the average expected life of our assets would tend to lengthen more than the expected average life of our liabilities and therefore would most likely result in a decrease to our asset sensitive position.
 
Our Asset/Liability policy currently limits projected changes in net interest income to a maximum variance of (5.0%) for every 100 basis point interest rate change measured over a 12 month and a 24 month period when compared to the flat rate scenario. In addition, our policy limits change in return on assets by a maximum of 15 basis points for every 100 basis point interest rate change when compared to the flat rate scenario, or the change will be limited to 20.0% of the flat rate scenario return on assets (for every 100 basis point interest rate change), whichever is less. These policy limits are re-evaluated on a periodic basis (not less than annually) and may be modified, as appropriate. Because of the asset-sensitivity of our balance sheet, coupled with little opportunity to decrease deposit rates further due to their current low nominal level, income is projected to decrease if interest rates fall. Also included in the decreasing rate scenario is the assumption that further declines are reflective of a deeper recession as well as narrower credit spreads from federal market intervention.
 
At December 31, 2009, income at risk (i.e., the change in net interest income) decreased 1.87% and decreased 3.50% based on a 300 basis point average increase or a 50 basis point average decrease, respectively. At June 30, 2010, income at risk decreased 0.17% and decreased 0.61% based on a 400 basis point average increase or a 50 basis point average decrease, respectively. At December 31, 2009, return on assets was modeled to decrease by 5 basis points and decrease by 6 basis points based on a 300 basis point increase or a 50 basis point decrease, respectively. At June 30, 2010, return on assets was modeled to decrease by 5 basis points and increase by 8 basis points based on a 400 basis point increase or a 50 basis point decrease, respectively. The following table depicts the percentage decrease in estimated net interest income over twelve months for the periods presented based on these scenarios:
 
                 
    Percentage Decrease in Estimated
    Net Interest Income Over 12 Months
    At June 30, 2010   At December 31, 2009
 
300 basis point increase
          1.87 %
400 basis point increase
    0.17 %      
50 basis point decrease
    0.61       3.50  


65


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income Analysis: Average Balance Sheets, Interest and Yields/Costs
 
The following tables present for the periods set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the effect thereof was not material. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of net deferred costs and premiums that are amortized to interest income or expense.
 
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    Average
    Interest and
    Yield/
    Average
    Interest and
    Yield/
 
    Balance     Dividends     Cost     Balance     Dividends     Cost  
                (Dollars in thousands)              
 
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
Loans receivable, net
  $ 1,359,526     $ 34,998       5.15 %   $ 1,319,911     $ 34,743       5.26 %
Investment securities
    120,860       2,560       4.24       153,957       3,695       4.80  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    17,007                   17,007              
Other earning assets
    7,316       3       0.08       711              
                                                 
Total interest-earning assets
    1,504,709       37,561       4.99       1,491,586       38,438       5.15  
                                                 
Non-interest-earning assets
    66,684                       59,501                  
                                                 
Total assets
  $ 1,571,393                     $ 1,551,087                  
                                                 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
NOW and money market accounts
  $ 346,874       793       0.46     $ 296,108       1,439       0.97  
Savings accounts(1)
    156,983       274       0.35       133,518       326       0.49  
Time deposits
    483,414       4,786       1.98       529,323       8,867       3.35  
                                                 
Total interest-bearing deposits
    987,271       5,853       1.19       958,949       10,632       2.22  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
    262,882       5,151       3.92       310,535       5,242       3.38  
                                                 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,250,153       11,004       1.76 %     1,269,484       15,874       2.50 %
                                                 
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
    160,141                       133,541                  
                                                 
Total liabilities
    1,410,294                       1,403,025                  
Stockholders’ Equity
    161,099                       148,062                  
                                                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,571,393                     $ 1,551,087                  
                                                 
Net interest income
          $ 26,557                     $ 22,564          
                                                 
Net interest rate spread(2)
                    3.23 %                     2.65 %
Net interest-earning assets(3)
  $ 254,556                     $ 222,102                  
                                                 
Net interest margin(4)
                    3.53 %                     3.03 %
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
                    120.36 %                     117.50 %
 
 
(1) Includes mortgagors’ and investors’ escrow accounts.
 
(2) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(3) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(4) Net interest margin represents the annualized net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
 


66


Table of Contents

                                                                         
    For the Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
          Interest
                Interest
                Interest
       
    Average
    and
    Yield/
    Average
    and
    Yield/
    Average
    and
    Yield/
 
    Balance     Dividends     Cost     Balance     Dividends     Cost     Balance     Dividends     Cost  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Interest-earning assets:
                                                                       
Loans receivable, net
  $ 1,333,770     $ 69,517       5.21 %   $ 1,193,416     $ 68,458       5.74 %   $ 1,076,674     $ 66,995       6.22 %
Total investment securities
    140,494       6,544       4.66       168,913       8,580       5.08       135,059       6,122       4.53  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    17,007             0.00       13,812       473       3.42       10,248       658       6.42  
Other earning assets
    931       1       0.11       2,376       34       1.43       2,443       102       4.18  
                                                                         
Total interest-earning assets
    1,492,202       76,062       5.10       1,378,517       77,545       5.63       1,224,424       73,877       6.03  
                                                                         
Non-interest-earning assets
    59,606                       57,255                       52,460                  
                                                                         
Total assets
  $ 1,551,808                     $ 1,435,772                     $ 1,276,884                  
                                                                         
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                                       
NOW and money market accounts
  $ 312,439       2,494       0.80     $ 249,038       4,728       1.90     $ 191,192       3,323       1.74  
Savings accounts(1)
    136,981       607       0.44       128,467       824       0.64       130,734       835       0.64  
Time deposits
    524,041       16,270       3.10       514,222       19,517       3.80       508,672       22,923       4.51  
                                                                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    973,461       19,371       1.99       891,727       25,069       2.81       830,598       27,081       3.26  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
    285,258       10,404       3.65       271,545       9,877       3.64       183,219       8,496       4.64  
                                                                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,258,719       29,775       2.37 %     1,163,272       34,946       3.00 %     1,013,817       35,577       3.51 %
                                                                         
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
    142,017                       117,983                       106,398                  
                                                                         
Total liabilities
    1,400,736                       1,281,255                       1,120,215                  
Stockholders’ equity
    151,072                       154,517                       156,669                  
                                                                         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,551,808                     $ 1,435,772                     $ 1,276,884                  
                                                                         
Net interest income
          $ 46,287                     $ 42,599                     $ 38,300          
                                                                         
Net interest rate spread(2)
                    2.73 %                     2.63 %                     2.52 %
Net interest-earning assets(3)
  $ 233,483                     $ 215,245                     $ 210,607                  
                                                                         
Net interest margin(4)
                    3.10 %                     3.09 %                     3.13 %
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
                    118.55 %                     118.50 %                     120.77 %
 
 
(1) Includes mortgagors’ and investors’ escrow accounts
 
(2) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(3) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(4) Net interest margin represents the annualized net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

67


Table of Contents

 
Rate Volume Analysis
 
The following tables set forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on net interest income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the volume and rate columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
 
                         
    Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009  
    Increase (Decrease)
    Total
 
    Due to     Increase
 
    Volume     Rate     (Decrease)  
    (In thousands)  
 
Interest and dividend income:
                       
Loans receivable
  $ 1,011     $ (756 )   $ 255  
Securities interest, dividends & income from other assets
    (581 )     (551 )     (1,132 )
                         
Total earning assets
    430       (1,307 )     (877 )
                         
Interest expense:
                       
NOW and money market accounts
    214       (860 )     (646 )
Savings accounts
    51       (103 )     (52 )
Time deposits
    (714 )     (3,367 )     (4,081 )
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    (449 )     (4,330 )     (4,779 )
FHLBB Advances
    (868 )     777       (91 )
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    (1,317 )     (3,553 )     (4,870 )
                         
Change in net interest income
  $ 1,747     $ 2,246     $ 3,993  
                         
 
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2009
    Year Ended December 31, 2008
 
    Compared to December 31, 2008     Compared to December 31, 2007  
    Increase (Decrease)
          Increase (Decrease)
       
    Due to           Due to        
    Volume     Rate     Net     Volume     Rate     Net  
    (In thousands)  
 
Interest and dividend income:
                                               
Loans receivable
  $ 7,637     $ (6,578 )   $ 1,059     $ 5,235     $ (3,772 )   $ 1,463  
Securities interest, dividends & income from other assets
    (1,210 )     (1,332 )     (2,542 )     1,817       388       2,205  
                                                 
Total earning assets
    6,427       (7,910 )     (1,483 )     7,052       (3,384 )     3,668  
                                                 
Interest expense:
                                               
NOW and money market accounts
    991       (3,225 )     (2,234 )     1,076       329       1,405  
Savings accounts
    52       (269 )     (217 )     (15 )     4       (11 )
Time deposits
    367       (3,614 )     (3,247 )     253       (3,659 )     (3,406 )
                                                 
Total interest-bearing deposits
    1,410       (7,108 )     (5,698 )     1,314       (3,326 )     (2,012 )
FHLBB Advances
    500       27       527       2,498       (1,117 )     1,381  
                                                 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,910       (7,081 )     (5,171 )     3,812       (4,443 )     (631 )
                                                 
Change in net interest income
  $ 4,517     $ (829 )   $ 3,688     $ 3,240     $ 1,059     $ 4,299  
                                                 


68


Table of Contents

The following tables present information indicating various obligations and commitments made by us as of December 31, 2009 and the respective maturity dates:
 
Contractual Obligations
 
                                         
                More than
    More than
       
          One
    One Year
    Three Years
       
          Year or
    Through
    Through
    Over Five
 
    Total     Less     Three Years     Five Years     Years  
    (In thousands)  
 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances(1)
  $ 263,802     $ 40,170     $ 110,720     $ 89,912     $ 23,000  
Interest expense payable on Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
    30,693       9,952       13,849       4,808       2,084  
Operating leases(2)
    13,682       787       1,511       1,383       10,001  
Other liabilities(3)
    2,876       28       547       646       1,655  
                                         
Total Contractual Obligations
  $ 311,053     $ 50,937     $ 126,627     $ 96,749     $ 36,740  
                                         
 
 
(1) Secured under a blanket security agreement on qualifying assets, principally, mortgage loans.
 
(2) Represents non-cancelable operating leases for offices and office equipment.
 
(3) Consists of estimated benefit payments over the next 10 years to retirees under unfunded nonqualified pension plans.
 
Other Commitments
 
                                         
                More than
    More than
       
          One
    One Year
    Three Years
       
          Year or
    Through
    Through
    Over Five
 
    Total     Less     Three Years     Five Years     Years  
    (In thousands)  
 
Real estate loan commitments(1)
  $ 35,330     $ 27,270     $     $     $ 8,060  
Commercial business loan commitments(1)
    1,320       698       350       272        
Commercial business loan lines of credit
    57,713       7,929       3,714             46,070  
Unused portion of home equity lines of credit(2)
    125,511       378       3,619       17,965       103,549  
Unused portion of construction loans
    86,492       37,711       35,365       1,893       11,523  
Unused checking overdraft lines of credit(3)
    94       94                    
Standby letters of credit
    10,555       9,065       890       600        
                                         
Total Other Commitments
  $ 317,015     $ 83,145     $ 43,938     $ 20,730     $ 169,202  
                                         
 
 
General:   Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract and generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses.
 
(1) Commitments for loans are extended to customers for up to 180 days after which they expire.
 
(2) Unused portions of home equity lines of credit are available to the borrower for up to 10 years.
 
(3) Unused portion of checking overdraft lines of credit are available to customers in “good standing”.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than noted above, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.


69


Table of Contents

 
BUSINESS OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
 
New Rockville Financial is a Connecticut stock corporation that was organized in September, 2010. Upon completion of the conversion and offering, New Rockville Financial will become the holding company of Rockville Bank and will succeed to all of the business and operations of Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC, both of which will cease to exist.
 
Following the completion of the conversion, New Rockville Financial will not have significant assets other than owning 100.0% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Rockville Bank, the net proceeds it retains from the offering and certain liquid assets. It will have no significant liabilities. New Rockville Financial intends to use the premises, equipment, staff and offices of Rockville Bank following the completion of the offering; however, if its business purposes change, New Rockville Financial may hire its own employees in the future.
 
New Rockville Financial intends to invest the net proceeds of the offering as discussed under “HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING”. In addition to using the proceeds to contribute to the charitable foundation and to fund a loan to our employee stock ownership plan to purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock, New Rockville Financial may use the proceeds for general corporate purposes, including, among other things, paying cash dividends to shareholders, repurchasing shares of its common stock, contributing additional capital to Rockville Bank and financing strategic growth opportunities.
 
BUSINESS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND ROCKVILLE BANK
 
Rockville Bank, a state-chartered stock savings bank organized in Connecticut in 1858, provides a full range of banking services to consumer and commercial customers through our main office in Rockville, Connecticut, 20 1 / 2 other branches located in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut and 42 ATMs, including 13 stand-alone ATM facilities. The “1/2” branch refers to an “in school” branch located at South Windsor High School in South Windsor, Connecticut, which only serves the school’s students, faculty and administrative staff and is not open to the general public. Rockville Bank is regulated by the Connecticut Department of Banking and the FDIC. Rockville Bank is also a member of the FHLBB.
 
Existing Rockville Financial was formed as a Connecticut mid-tier stock holding company on December 17, 2004 to hold all of the common stock of Rockville Bank. It does not own or lease any property, but rather uses the premises, equipment, staff and offices of Rockville Bank. We employed 216 full-time equivalent employees at June 30, 2010 and 211 at December 31, 2009. Management of Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank are substantially identical.
 
We strive to remain a leader in meeting the financial service needs of the local community and to provide quality service to the individuals, families, professionals and businesses in the market areas we serve. We are a community-oriented provider of traditional banking products and services to business organizations and individuals, offering products such as residential, commercial real estate, commercial business and consumer loans and a variety of deposit products.
 
Our business philosophy is to continue to operate and grow as a well capitalized, profitable and competitive financial institution. Current strategies include remaining an independent community-oriented institution; continuing our emphasis on one-to four family residential real estate lending; continuing our emphasis on commercial real estate lending; increasing our emphasis on commercial business lending; expanding our banking franchise; and growing our deposit base.
 
Our success greatly depends on the contributions of our executive management and other key personnel. In June 2010, we announced that William J. McGurk, our longstanding President and Chief Executive Officer, will retire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in April 2011. Mr. McGurk will remain on our Board of Directors until his term expires in 2013. Our Board of Directors and Mr. McGurk have had preliminary discussions regarding a possible continuing consulting role after his retirement. In addition, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. retired on June 30, 2010.


70


Table of Contents

Mr. Jeamel remains on the Board until 2011 when his current term expires. Our Board of Directors intends to nominate him for an additional two-year term until 2013 to facilitate transition issues and to amend the Board’s policy on mandatory retirement to allow him to serve the additional year. Mr. Jeamel currently consults for Rockville Bank as well. His former Chief Operating Officer responsibilities were assumed by Executive Vice Presidents, Christopher E. Buchholz and Richard J. Trachimowicz.
 
The timeframe for these announced retirements was designed to allow our Board of Directors to consider and determine successors for these positions in an orderly and deliberate process. We are currently engaged in a search for Mr. McGurk’s successor and expect to identify Mr. McGurk’s replacement in January 2011. A new Chief Operating Officer may be named after consultation with the new Chief Executive Officer. We have retained Kaplan Associates to assist us in identifying Mr. McGurk’s successor. Our Succession Committee, composed of six independent directors and Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel, has been working closely with Kaplan Associates over the past three months to identify external and internal potential candidates for the position of President and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors and management is committed to employing a President and Chief Executive Officer who will contribute to the continued successful operation and strategic growth of our financial institution, including the effective deployment of the capital raised in this offering, while remaining true to our philosophy to remain an independent, community-oriented franchise, focused on providing superior customer services to meet the needs of our communities. Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel have each been instrumental in the success of Rockville Bank and are working with our Succession Committee and Kaplan Associates to identify qualified candidates. While we will strive to make this transition as smooth as possible, this leadership change may result in disruptions to our business or operations. In addition, our success will depend on our ability to recruit and retain additional highly-skilled personnel.
 
In addition to having a strong executive management team and Board of Directors, the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC and our local advisory boards assist management in strengthening our business and meeting our short and long-term corporate objectives. The corporators and members of the advisory boards act as our eyes and ears in our community, providing management with advice and feedback with respect to our products and services, the quality of our customer service, marketing initiatives and competition in our market area. They also assist in the growth of our business through referrals and representing us at community events.
 
There are currently 81 corporators of Rockville Financial MHC, each of whom is serving a one-year term. As the governing board of Rockville Financial MHC, the corporators currently have authority to amend the bylaws and certificate of incorporation of Rockville Financial MHC In addition, their approval is needed to complete the conversion and offering. Upon the completion of the conversion and offering, Rockville Financial, MHC will cease to exist. We believe, however, that the corporators serve an important advisory role to our institution and their continued involvement after the completion of the conversion will provide additional value to our business. While the corporators will no longer have any policy making authority, they will act as a corporator advisory board and meet with our Board of Directors and management on a bi-annual basis to provide non-binding informed guidance to management with respect to issues facing our franchise on an institution-wide level. The corporators will continue to be paid a per meeting fee for their services.
 
Our 21 local advisory boards, comprised of between two and ten members each, serve our branch offices located throughout our market area. Each advisory board member is assigned to a specific branch advisory board and serves a two-year term. With the exception of only one branch, each branch has its own advisory board that meets between two to three times per year and each member provides a monthly update to each branch manager. The structure and role of our local advisory boards will remain the same after the completion of the conversion and offering.
 
Market Area
 
We operate in a primarily suburban market area that has a stable population and household base. All of our current offices are located in Connecticut, in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties. Our market area is located in the north central part of Connecticut including, in part, the eastern part of the greater Hartford metropolitan area. Our main office is located in Rockville and is located approximately 15 miles from Hartford. Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties have a mix of industry groups and employment


71


Table of Contents

sectors, including services, wholesale and retail trade, and manufacturing as the basis of the local economy. Our primary market area for deposits includes the communities in which we maintain our banking office locations. Our primary lending area is broader than our primary deposit market area and includes all of Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties, and parts of the adjacent Windham and Middlesex Counties in Connecticut. In addition to our primary lending areas, we have expanded lending activities to include an out of state regional commercial real estate lending program, which currently operates in the New England States, New York, New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania. We may expand our focus to other areas of the Mid-Atlantic region as new quality lending opportunities arise.
 
Competition
 
We face competition within our market area both in making loans and attracting deposits. Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties have a high concentration of financial institutions including large commercial banks, community banks and credit unions. Some of our competitors offer products and services that we currently do not offer, such as trust services and private banking.
 
The following table sets forth our deposit market share in Tolland, New London and Hartford Counties as of June 30, 2009, based on the most recent data available from the FDIC:
 
                         
    Market
  Market
  Institutions in
Market Area
  Share   Share Rank   Market
 
Tolland County, Connecticut
    25.1 %     2       12  
Hartford County, Connecticut
    2.0 %     9       25  
New London County, Connecticut
    .36 %     16       16  
 
Our competition for loans and deposits comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms and credit unions. We face additional competition for deposits from money market funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds and insurance companies. Our primary focus is to build and develop profitable customer relationships across all lines of business while continuing to support the communities within our service area.
 
Properties
 
At June 30, 2010, we operated through our main office at 25 Park Street, Rockville, Connecticut, 21 additional banking offices, including a special-need limited services branch and our 42 ATMs, including 13 stand-alone ATM facilities. The special-need limited services banking office opened in September 2009. Of the 22 banking offices, 7 are owned and 15 are leased. Lease expiration dates of our branches range from 7 months to 18 years with renewal options of 1 to 20 years. We continue to make lease payments for 1 stand-alone ATM closed in January 2010, the lease for which expires in March 2011. We sub-lease part of 2 of our locations to third parties.
 
Our banking offices are located as follows:
 
         
    Number of
Office Locations
  Offices
 
Hartford County, Connecticut
    13  
New London County, Connecticut
    1  
Tolland County, Connecticut
    8  
Total:
    22  
 
Lending Activities
 
Summary:   Historically, our principal lending activity has been the origination of first mortgage loans for the purchase or refinancing of one-to-four family residential real estate. Residential mortgage loans, including one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit, represented $747.4 million and $754.8 million, or 53.6% and 55.0% of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We also offer commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans, construction mortgage


72


Table of Contents

loans and consumer loans. Commercial real estate loans totaled $449.5 million and $426.0 million, or 32.2% and 31.0%, of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Construction loans, which include commercial construction and residential construction loans, totaled $63.8 million and $71.1 million, or 4.6% and 5.2%, of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Commercial business loans totaled $127.8 million and $113.2 million, or 9.2% and 8.3%, of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Installment, collateral and other loans, consisting primarily of loans on new and used automobiles, loans secured by deposit accounts and unsecured personal loans, totaled $7.1 million and $7.7 million, or 0.5% and 0.6%, of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Our net deferred loan fees and premiums totaled $631,000 and $632,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
 
The composition of our loan portfolio was as follows at the dates indicated:
 
                 
    At June 30, 2010  
    Amount     Percent  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Real estate loans:
               
Residential(1)
  $ 747,421       53.55 %
Commercial
    449,534       32.21  
Construction(2)
    63,778       4.57  
Commercial business loans
    127,758       9.16  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    7,058       0.51  
                 
Total loans
    1,395,549       100.00 %
                 
Net deferred loan costs and premiums
    631          
Allowance for loan losses
    (13,144 )        
                 
Loans, net
  $ 1,383,036          
                 
 
 
(1) Residential mortgage loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
(2) Construction loans include commercial and residential loans and are reported net of undisbursed construction loans of $62.7 million as of June 30, 2010.
 
                                                                                 
    At December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Real estate loans:
                                                                               
Residential(1)
  $ 754,838       54.98 %   $ 746,041       57.26 %   $ 666,003       59.18 %   $ 640,076       61.46 %   $ 557,306       64.31 %
Commercial
    426,028       31.03       351,474       26.97       284,460       25.28       232,550       22.33       149,006       17.19  
Construction(2)
    71,078       5.18       89,099       6.84       70,617       6.27       63,902       6.14       47,105       5.44  
Commercial business loans
    113,240       8.25       106,684       8.19       92,869       8.25       97,234       9.34       109,099       12.59  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    7,742       0.56       9,629       0.74       11,469       1.02       7,607       0.73       4,119       0.47  
                                                                                 
Total loans
    1,372,926       100.00 %     1,302,927       100.00 %     1,125,418       100.00 %     1,041,369       100.00 %     866,635       100.00 %
                                                                                 
Net deferred loan costs and premiums
    632               1,417               1,529               1,813               1,740          
Allowance for loan losses
    (12,539 )             (12,553 )             (10,620 )             (9,827 )             (8,675 )        
                                                                                 
Loans, net
  $ 1,361,019             $ 1,291,791             $ 1,116,327             $ 1,033,355             $ 859,700          
                                                                                 


73


Table of Contents

 
(1) Residential mortgage loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
(2) Construction loans include commercial and residential loans and are reported net of undisbursed construction loans of $86.5 million, $93.9 million, $96.8 million, $93.6 million and $64.1 million as of December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
Major loan customers:   Our ten largest lending relationships are with commercial borrowers with loans totaling $149.4 million or 10.7% of our loan portfolio as of June 30 2010. These relationships consist of:
 
(i) $19.4 million extended to a large retail developer on three properties in the greater Hartford, Connecticut area. The first loan, originated in November 2005, is a permanent mortgage facility on a retail development in South Windsor, Connecticut. The second loan was a permanent mortgage facility on a retail development in Manchester, Connecticut that originated in March 2006. The third loan was originated in December 2008 and was used to finance the acquisition and development of a multi-use commercial development in South Windsor, Connecticut;
 
(ii) $17.8 million extended to a commercial real estate investor headquartered in Florida with regional offices in Buffalo, New York, Rochester, New York and South Orange, New Jersey. Two loans were originated in March 2006 and August 2009 and are secured by retail properties in New Jersey and New York, respectively;
 
(iii) $15.9 million extended to a commercial real estate investor based in Amherst, New York secured by two office buildings located in Amherst, New York and Fairport, New York. These two credit facilities were originated in March, 2006 and January, 2009;
 
(iv) $15.3 million extended to a real estate investor based in Hartford, Connecticut. The loans are secured by a 25,000 square foot retail plaza in Tolland, Connecticut and an apartment complex in Norwich, Connecticut. The loans were originated in March 2007 and July 2007, respectively;
 
(v) $15.2 million extended to a New Jersey based real estate developer secured by an office building located in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. This permanent mortgage loan was originated in July 2006;
 
(vi) $13.7 million extended to an Illinois based real estate investor secured by five industrial buildings in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. This loan was originated in September 2009;
 
(vii) $13.4 million extended to Massachusetts based real estate investors secured by six retail centers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Connecticut. This facility was originated in April 2007.
 
(viii) $13.4 million extended to a Connecticut based real estate developer. Four loans are secured by four retail properties in Connecticut and Massachusetts and were originated in September 2006, November 2007, January 2008 and August 2009;
 
(ix) $13.0 million extended to a New York based real estate investor secured by a 163,000 square foot retail center in Dover, New Hampshire. This credit facility was originated in May, 2010; and
 
(x) $12.4 million extended to New Jersey based real estate investors secured by two retail properties in New Jersey. These loans were originated in September 2007 and June 2010.
 
Of the $149.4 million extended to the ten largest borrowers as of June 30, 2010, there was one relationship of $15.3 million that was classified as substandard. The $15.3 million exposure consisted of a $3.7 million mortgage on a retail plaza in Tolland, Connecticut and an $11.2 million mortgage on an apartment complex in Norwich, Connecticut. The $3.7 million loan was carried in non-accrual status as of June 30, 2010 and we took title to the property in July, 2010 through foreclosure. That property is now carried in other real estate owned. The $11.2 million mortgage is current and performing in accordance with the terms of the loan. All other credit facilities described above are current and performing in accordance with their respective terms.


74


Table of Contents

For further information on credit quality, see the discussion under the headings “Non-performing and Problem Assets,” “Classified Assets,” “Loan Delinquencies,” “Potential Problem Loans,” and “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS”.
 
Residential Real Estate Loans:   One of our primary lending activities consists of the origination of one-to-four family residential real estate loans that are primarily secured by properties located in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties. Of the $747.4 million and $754.8 million one-to-four family residential loans at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, $558.5 and $566.5 were first mortgage loans, $62.2 million and $69.6 million were fixed rate home equity loans and $126.7 and $118.7 million consisted of balances outstanding on home equity lines of credit. Generally, residential real estate loans are originated in amounts up to 80.0% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the property, with private mortgage insurance required on loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80.0%. We usually do not make loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 97.0% for loans secured by single-family homes. Fixed rate mortgage loans generally are originated for terms of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years. Typically, all fixed rate residential mortgage loans are underwritten according to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) policies and procedures. Fixed rate residential mortgage loans are periodically sold in the secondary market. We will usually retain the servicing rights for all loans that we sell in the secondary market. We originated $42.4 million of fixed rate one-to-four family residential loans during the six months ended June 30, 2010, $26.1 million of which were sold in the secondary market. We originated $132.4 million of fixed rate one-to-four family residential loans during the year ended December 31, 2009, $44.0 million of which were sold in the secondary market.
 
We also offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans for one-to-four family properties, with an interest rate which adjusts annually based on the one-year Constant Maturity Treasury Bill Index, after either a one-, three-, four-, five-, seven-, or nine-year initial fixed rate period. We originated $45.4 million of adjustable rate one-to-four family residential loans during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and $71.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, we purchased $2.5 million in adjustable rate mortgages from two local mortgage banking firms during the year ended December 31, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 we purchased $82,000 in adjustable rate mortgages. Our adjustable rate mortgage loans generally provide for maximum rate adjustments of 200 basis points per adjustment, with a lifetime maximum adjustment up to 6.0%, regardless of the initial rate. Our adjustable rate mortgage loans amortize over terms of up to 30 years.
 
Adjustable rate mortgage loans decrease the risk associated with changes in market interest rates by periodically repricing, but involve other risks because as interest rates increase, the underlying payments by the borrower increase, thus increasing the potential for default by the borrower. At the same time, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates. Upward adjustment of the contractual interest rate is also limited by the maximum periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustments permitted by our loan documents and, therefore, the effectiveness of adjustable rate mortgage loans may be limited during periods of rapidly rising interest rates. Of our one-to-four family residential loans, $165.5 million, or 29.7%, and $178.7 million, or 31.5%, had adjustable rates of interest at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively and $86.9 million of these loans will see a rate reset on or before December 31, 2010. Continued declines in real estate values and the slowdown in the housing market may make it more difficult for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to sell their homes or refinance their debt due to their declining collateral values.
 
In an effort to provide financing for low and moderate income home buyers, we offer a first time home buyer program at reduced rates and favorable closing costs. This program allows first time home buyers to borrow with lower down payment requirements, lower origination points and reduced fees. These loans are offered with adjustable rates of interest at terms of up to 30 years. Such loans are secured by one-to-four family residential properties. All of these loans are originated using government agency underwriting guidelines.
 
All residential mortgage loans that we originate include “due-on-sale” clauses, which give us the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event that, among other things, the borrower sells or


75


Table of Contents

otherwise disposes of the real property. We also require homeowner’s insurance and, where circumstances warrant, flood insurance on properties securing real estate loans. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, our largest residential mortgage loan had a principal balance of $1.1 million and $1.6 million. This loan is performing in accordance with the agreed repayment terms.
 
We also offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit, both of which are secured by owner-occupied one-to-four family residences. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, home equity loans and equity lines of credit totaled $188.9 million and $188.3 million, or 13.5% or 13.7%, of total loans, respectively. At December 31, 2009, the unadvanced amounts of home equity lines of credit totaled $125.5 million, as compared to $135.2 million at June 30, 2010. The underwriting standards utilized for home equity loans and home equity lines of credit include a determination of the applicant’s credit history, an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan and the value of the collateral securing the loan. Home equity loans are offered with fixed rates of interest and with terms of up to 15 years. The loan-to-value ratio for our home equity loans and our lines of credit, including any first mortgage, is generally limited to no more than 90.0%. Our home equity lines of credit have ten-year terms and adjustable rates of interest which are indexed to the prime rate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal . Interest rates on home equity lines of credit are generally limited to a maximum rate of 18.0% per annum.
 
Commercial Real Estate Loans:   We originate commercial real estate loans and loans on owner- occupied properties used for a variety of business purposes including small office buildings, industrial facilities and retail facilities. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, commercial mortgage loans totaled $449.5 million and $426.0 million, or 32.2% and 31.0%, respectively, of total loans. Our commercial real estate underwriting policies provide that typically such real estate loans may be made in amounts of up to 80.0% of the appraised value of the property. Our commercial real estate loans may be made with terms of up to 20 years and amortization schedules up to 30 years and are offered with interest rates that are fixed or adjust periodically and are generally indexed to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Classic Advance Rates. In reaching a decision on whether to make a commercial real estate loan, we consider gross revenues and the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, business cash flow and credit history, and the appraised value of the underlying property. In addition, with respect to commercial real estate rental properties, we will also consider the terms and conditions of the leases and the credit quality of the tenants. We typically require that the properties securing these real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization divided by interest expense and current maturities of long term debt) of at least 1.15 times. Environmental surveys are generally required for commercial real estate loans. Generally, a commercial real estate loan made to a corporation, partnership or other business entity requires personal guarantees by the principals and owners of 20.0% or more of the entity.
 
A commercial borrower’s financial information is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring periodic financial statement updates and payment history reviews and typically includes periodic face-to-face meetings between us and the borrower. We generally require commercial borrowers to provide updated financial statements and federal tax returns annually. These requirements also apply to all guarantors of commercial loans. We also require borrowers with rental investment property to provide an annual report of income and expenses for the property, including a tenant list and copies of leases, as applicable. The largest commercial real estate loan or commitment as of June 30, 2010 was a loan for $19.4 million, which was performing in accordance with its terms.
 
Loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family properties, generally involve larger principal amounts and a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family properties, are often dependent on successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.
 
In late 2006, we introduced a regional commercial real estate lending program that provides permanent and construction to permanent loans to qualified borrowers with properties located in New England, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. The program was initiated and is run by an experienced lender


76


Table of Contents

who ran a similar program at another Connecticut bank for a number of years. These loans are typically referred through correspondent relationships that the bank has established with reputable mortgage brokerage companies throughout the markets covered. The program focuses on commercial mortgages which are evaluated on the basis of the appraised value of the property, ability of existing or projected cash flows to cover loan payments, and overall track record and financial strength of the borrower and guarantors. By expanding the lending areas under this program, our overall portfolio is benefited by geographic diversification as well as increased opportunities to make loans. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the portfolio had $155.1 and $140.6 million in real estate loans outstanding under our regional commercial real estate lending program. With the exception of one loan for $3.7 million which has become other real estate owned, all loans in the portfolio are performing as agreed. We may expand our focus to other areas of the Mid-Atlantic region as new lending opportunities arise.
 
The following table presents the amounts and percentages of commercial real estate loans held by type as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
 
                                 
    At June 30, 2010     At December 31, 2009  
    Amount     Percentage     Amount     Percentage  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Type of Commercial Real Estate Loan
                               
Regional CRE Program
  $ 155,069       34.5 %   $ 140,566       33.0 %
Owner Occupied
    37,401       8.3       31,968       7.5  
Industrial
    37,736       8.4       29,952       7.0  
Office
    51,645       11.5       45,454       10.7  
Retail
    61,660       13.7       58,011       13.6  
Multi-Family
    38,378       8.5       38,719       9.1  
Subdivisions
    7,437       1.7       8,132       1.9  
Land
    12,579       2.8       3,270       0.8  
Other
    47,629       10.6       69,956       16.4  
                                 
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans
  $ 449,534       100.0 %   $ 426,028       100.0 %
                                 
 
The following table presents the amounts and percentages of commercial real estate loans held by geographic location of the real property securing the loan as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
 
                                 
    At June 30, 2010     At December 31, 2009  
    Amount     Percentage     Amount     Percentage  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Geographic Region
                               
Connecticut
  $ 312,849       69.6 %   $ 300,334       70.5 %
Western/Upstate New York
    51,736       11.5       52,738       12.4  
Metropolitan New York
    4,919       1.1       2,984       0.7  
Northern/Central New Jersey
    35,922       8.0       42,280       9.9  
Southern New Jersey/Pennsylvania
    29,653       6.6       21,313       5.0  
New England (not including Connecticut)
    14,455       3.2       6,379       1.5  
                                 
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans
  $ 449,534       100.0 %   $ 426,028       100.0 %
                                 
 
Given our level of commercial real estate exposure, an enhanced commercial real estate portfolio risk management program has been established to better enable us to evaluate the risk in our current portfolio and to implement changes toward future lending so as to minimize overall portfolio risk. As part of this program, the commercial real estate portfolio is subject to concentration limit and market analyses, stress testing and is subject to monitoring, reporting and underwriting standards.


77


Table of Contents

Construction Loans:   We offer commercial construction loans including real estate subdivision development loans to licensed contractors and builders for the construction and development of commercial real estate projects and one-to-four family residential properties. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, commercial construction loans outstanding totaled $58.3 million and $62.6 million, which amounted to 4.2% and 4.6%, of total loans outstanding. At June 30, 2010, the unadvanced portion of these construction loans totaled $58.8 million, as compared to $83.6 million at December 31, 2009. Our commercial real estate underwriting policies provide that typically such real estate loans may be made in amounts of up to 80% of the appraised value of the property. We extend loans to residential subdivision developers for the purpose of land acquisition, the development of infrastructure and the construction of homes. Advances are determined as a percentage of cost or appraised value (whichever is less) and the project is physically inspected prior to each advance. We typically limit the numbers of model homes financed by a customer, with the majority of construction advances supported by purchase contracts.
 
As of June 30, 2010, the largest outstanding commercial construction lending relationship with a single borrower totaled $14.8 million. The first loan, a $10 million credit facility with $6.3 million outstanding as of June 30, 2010, was for the development of property located in Middlesex County, Connecticut. The property is pre-leased to a major regional tenant. The loan is secured partially by an interest reserve; however, the interest reserve for this loan was funded by the borrower rather than by us, in an amount to provide sufficient time for the tenant to take occupancy. The second loan, in the amount of $4.8 million, is secured by property located in New London County, Connecticut. There is no interest reserve on the $4.8 million loan. Both loans are current and performing according to their respective terms.
 
Commercial real estate subdivision loans and commercial and residential real estate loans to contractors entail significant additional risks as compared to single-family residential mortgage lending to owner-occupants. These loans typically involve large loan balances concentrated in single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. A continued economic downturn could have an additional adverse impact on the value of the properties securing construction loans and on our borrowers’ ability to sell their units for the amounts necessary to complete their projects and repay their loans.
 
We also originate construction loans to individuals and contractors for the construction and acquisition of personal residences. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, residential construction mortgage loans outstanding amounted to $5.5 million, or 0.4%, and $8.5 million, or 0.6%, respectively, of total loans. The unadvanced portion of these construction loans totaled $3.9 million and $2.9 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
 
Our residential construction mortgage loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is typically up to nine months, although our policy is to consider construction periods as long as 12 months. At the end of the construction phase, the construction loan converts to a long-term owner-occupied residential mortgage loan. Construction loans can be made with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80%. Before making a commitment to fund a residential construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser. We also review and inspect each property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan. Loan proceeds are disbursed after inspection based on the percentage of completion method. Construction loans to individuals are generally made on the same terms as our one-to-four family mortgage loans.
 
Our largest residential construction mortgage loan commitment was for $940,000 as of June 30, 2010, all of which had been disbursed. At December 31, 2009, our largest residential construction mortgage loan commitment was for $2.0 million, all of which had been disbursed. These loans are performing according to their terms.
 
Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than longer-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the actual cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost is too low, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Additionally, if the estimate of value is too high, we may be confronted with a project,


78


Table of Contents

when completed, with a value that is insufficient to assure full payment. Construction lending contains a unique risk characteristic as loans are originated under market and economic conditions that may change between the time of origination and the completion and subsequent purchaser financing of the property.
 
Commercial Business Loans:   We had $127.8 million and $113.2 million in commercial business loans, of which $23.8 million and $24.5 million were guaranteed by either the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) or the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We occasionally purchase USDA guaranteed loans in the secondary loan market from various experienced brokers. These loans carry a variable rate and adjust on a quarterly basis using the prime rate as the base index. There is no risk of loss of principal or accrued interest up to loan payment dates, as we purchase only the guaranteed portion of the loan. The guarantee is that of the full faith and credit of the United States of America. We determine the loans to be purchased based on net yield, borrower credit rating, size and the business segment composition of the existing portfolio. Monthly payments are received directly from the original lending institution. As of June 30, 2010, of the $23.8 million of guaranteed loans, $1.9 million were SBA loans originated by us and $21.9 million were purchased and fully guaranteed by USDA. As of December 31, 2009, of the $24.5 million of guaranteed loans, $1.8 million were SBA loans originated by us and $22.7 million were purchased and fully guaranteed by USDA. In addition to SBA and USDA loans, our commercial business loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 included $45.1 million and $33.8 million in revolving business lines of credit with an additional $57.7 million and $57.7 million of unused lines of credit commitments and $58.9 million and $54.9 million in commercial business term loans, respectively. Total commercial business loans amounted to 9.2% of total loans as of June 30, 2010 and 8.3% of total loans as of December 31, 2009.
 
We make commercial business loans primarily in our market area to a variety of professionals, sole proprietorships and small businesses. Commercial business lending products include term loans and revolving lines of credit. The maximum amount of a commercial business loan is limited by our loans-to-one-borrower limit (15.0% of equity capital and our allowance for loan losses, pursuant to Connecticut law). Such loans are generally used for longer-term working capital purposes such as purchasing equipment or financing short-term cash needs. Commercial business loans are made with either adjustable or fixed rates of interest. Variable rates are based on the prime rate, as published in The Wall Street Journal, plus a margin. Fixed rate commercial loans are set at a margin above the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Classic Advance Rates.
 
When making commercial business loans, we consider the financial statements of the borrower, our lending history with the borrower, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business and the value of the collateral. Commercial business loans are generally secured by a variety of collateral, primarily accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, and are supported by personal guarantees. Depending on the collateral used to secure the loans, commercial business loans are typically made up to 80.0% of the value of the loan collateral. We do not typically make unsecured commercial business loans greater than $100,000.
 
Commercial business loans generally have greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial business loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Further, any collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value. We seek to minimize these risks through our underwriting standards. At December 31, 2009, our largest commercial business loan commitment totaled $15.0 million with $12.9 million of advances drawn as of December 31, 2009, which was performing according to its terms. As of June 30, 2010, our largest commercial business loan commitment totaled $18.9 million with $12.3 million of advances drawn as of June 30, 2010, which was performing according to its terms. In addition to the commercial business loans discussed above, we had $10.7 million and $10.6 million in outstanding letters of credit as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.


79


Table of Contents

Installment, Collateral and Other Loans:   We offer a limited range of installment and collateral consumer loans, principally to customers residing in our primary market area with acceptable credit ratings. Our installment and collateral consumer loans generally consist of loans on new and used automobiles, including indirect automobile loans, loans collateralized by deposit accounts and unsecured personal loans. Installment and collateral consumer loans totaled $7.1 million and $7.7 million or 0.5% and 0.6% of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. This portfolio included $2.1 million of fully secured collateral loans, $4.2 million of direct and indirect auto loans and $787,000 of other consumer unsecured loans at June 30, 2010, and $2.0 million of fully secured collateral loans, $5.0 million of direct and indirect auto loans and $754,000 of other consumer unsecured loans at December 31, 2009. While the asset quality of these portfolios is currently good, there is increased risk associated with auto and consumer loans during economic downturns as increased unemployment and inflationary costs may make it more difficult for some borrowers to repay their loans.
 
Origination, Purchasing and Servicing of Loans:   All loans originated by us are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures. We originate both adjustable rate and fixed rate loans. Our ability to originate fixed or adjustable rate loans is dependent upon the relative customer demand for such loans, which is affected by the current and expected future level of interest rates.
 
Generally, we retain in our portfolio all loans that we originate. However, for strategic reasons, including our interest rate risk management objectives, we periodically sell fixed rate residential mortgage loans which conform to the underwriting standards specified by Freddie Mac. We also sell all mortgage loans insured by the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority. All one-to-four family loans that we sell are sold pursuant to master commitments negotiated with Freddie Mac and on a non-recourse basis. Historically, in such instances, our loans have been typically sold to either Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) or Freddie Mac, and we have retained the rights to service those loans. We currently have no reason to believe our practices will change in the near future. Depending on interest rate levels at the time of any such sale, loans may be sold at either a net gain or a net loss. Additionally, there is no guarantee we will be able to reinvest the proceeds from any future loan sales at interest rates comparable to the interest rates on the loans that are sold. Reinvestment in loans with lower interest rates would result in lower interest income on the reinvested proceeds compared to the interest income previously generated by the loans that were sold.
 
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we were servicing loans sold in the amount of $81.4 million and $57.7 million, respectively. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting for principal and interest, contacting delinquent mortgagors, supervising foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the loans.
 
In addition to purchasing loans guaranteed by USDA or SBA, we purchase adjustable rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans from two local mortgage banking firms licensed with the Connecticut Department of Banking. These local mortgage bankers are not employed by us and sell their loans based on competitive pricing. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we purchased $82,000 in adjustable rate loans and during the year ended December 31, 2009, we purchased $2.5 million in adjustable rate loans from these firms. The loans are underwritten to the same credit specifications as our internally originated loans.


80


Table of Contents

Loan Maturity Schedule:   The following table sets forth the loan maturity schedule at December 31, 2009:
 
                                 
    Loans Maturing  
          After One
             
    Within One
    But Within
    After Five
       
    Year     Five Years     Years     Total  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2009
                               
Real estate loans:
                               
Residential(1)
  $ 1,329     $ 27,178     $ 726,331     $ 754,838  
Commercial
    8,063       76,036       341,929       426,028  
Construction
    11,130       21,400       38,548       71,078  
Commercial business loans
    2,378       33,970       76,892       113,240  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    228       5,603       1,911       7,742  
                                 
Total
  $ 23,128     $ 164,187     $ 1,185,611     $ 1,372,926  
                                 
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
Loans Contractually Due Subsequent to December 31, 2010:   The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of fixed rate and adjustable rate loans at December 31, 2009 that are contractually due after December 31, 2010:
 
                         
    Due After December 31, 2010  
    Fixed     Adjustable     Total  
    (In thousands)  
 
Real estate loans:
                       
Residential(1)
  $ 456,689     $ 296,820     $ 753,509  
Commercial
    164,693       253,272       417,965  
Construction
          59,948       59,948  
Commercial business loans
    17,520       93,342       110,862  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    6,941       573       7,514  
                         
Total loans
  $ 645,843     $ 703,955     $ 1,349,798  
                         
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority:   Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our Board of Directors. The loan approval process is intended to assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, the viability of the loan, and the adequacy of the value of the property that will secure the loan, if applicable. To assess the borrower’s ability to repay, we review the employment and credit history and information on the historical and projected income and expenses of borrowers.
 
Our policies and loan approval limits are established by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has designated lending authority based on officer level and loan type to a limited group of officers to approve loans of various amounts up to $500,000. Our President, Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking Officer can approve loans for up to and including $1.5 million. Loans above $1.5 million up to $5.0 million are approved by the Board of Directors’ Lending Committee. Loans above $5.0 million must be approved by the Board of Directors.
 
Non-performing and Problem Assets:   Delinquency notices are mailed monthly to all delinquent borrowers, advising them of the amount of their delinquency. When a loan becomes more than 30 days delinquent,


81


Table of Contents

we send a letter advising the borrower of the delinquency. The borrower is given 30 days to pay the delinquent payments or to contact us to make arrangements to bring the loan current over a longer period of time. If the borrower fails to bring the loan current within 90 days from the original due date or to make arrangements to cure the delinquency over a longer period of time, the matter is referred to legal counsel and foreclosure or other collection proceedings are started. We may consider forbearance in select cases where a temporary loss of income is the primary cause of the delinquency, if a reasonable plan is presented by the borrower to cure the delinquency in a reasonable period of time after his or her income resumes.
 
All non-commercial mortgage loans are reviewed on a regular basis, and such loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become more than 90 days delinquent. Commercial real estate and commercial business loans are evaluated for non-accrual status on a case-by-case basis, but are typically placed on a non-accrual status when they become more than 90 days delinquent. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, $201,000 of interest income related to non-accrual loans was reversed compared to $554,000 for the same period ended June 30, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, $233,000 of interest income related to non-accrual loans was reversed compared to $237,000 recorded for 2008.
 
Classified Assets:   Under our internal risk rating system, we currently classify loans and other assets considered to be of lesser quality as “substandard,” “doubtful,” “loss” or “impaired” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by either the current net worth or the paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets classified as “loss” are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets classified as “impaired” are those that exhibit elevated risk characteristics that differentiate themselves from the homogeneous loan categories.
 
The loan portfolio is reviewed on a regular basis to determine whether any loans require risk classification or reclassification. Not all classified assets constitute non-performing assets.


82


Table of Contents

Loan Delinquencies:   The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our loan portfolio delinquencies at the dates indicated.
 
                                                 
    Loans Delinquent for              
    60-89 Days     90 Days and Over     Total  
    Number     Amount     Number     Amount     Number     Amount  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
At June 30, 2010
                                               
Residential(1)
         11     $ 1,228            15     $ 2,122            26     $ 3,350  
Commercial
    3       1,472       5       6,164       8       7,636  
Construction
                7       3,208       7       3,208  
Commercial business loans
    4       125       7       526       11       651  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    1       4       1       1       2       5  
                                                 
Total
    19     $ 2,829       35     $ 12,021       54     $ 14,850  
                                                 
At December 31, 2009
                                               
Residential(1)
    11     $ 2,072       17     $ 1,970       28     $ 4,042  
Commercial
    1       421       5       2,242       6       2,663  
Construction
                7       6,630       7       6,630  
Commercial business loans
    3       220       3       61       6       281  
Installment, collateral and other loans
                                   
                                                 
Total
    15     $ 2,713       32     $ 10,903       47     $ 13,616  
                                                 
At December 31, 2008
                                               
Residential(1)
    9     $ 1,237       14     $ 1,685       23     $ 2,922  
Commercial
    2       652       2       1,202       4       1,854  
Construction
                4       3,021       4       3,021  
Commercial business loans
    3       923       2       372       5       1,295  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    3       47       2       11       5       58  
                                                 
Total
    17     $ 2,859       24     $ 6,291       41     $ 9,150  
                                                 
At December 31, 2007
                                               
Residential(1)
    4     $ 389       6     $ 407       10     $ 796  
Commercial
    2       79       1       74       3       153  
Construction
    1       515                   1       515  
Commercial business loans
    2       164       2       692       4       856  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    2       4                   2       4  
                                                 
Total
    11     $ 1,151       9     $ 1,173       20     $ 2,324  
                                                 
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
Non-performing Assets:   The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the dates indicated. Once a loan is 90 days delinquent or either the borrower or the loan collateral experiences an event that makes collectibility suspect, the loan is placed on “non-accrual” status. Our policy requires six months of continuous payments in order for the loan to be removed from non-accrual status.
 


83


Table of Contents

                                                 
    At June 30,
    At December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Non-accrual loans:
                                               
Residential(1)
  $ 4,031     $ 3,106     $ 2,607     $ 407     $ 422     $ 821  
Commercial
    6,507       2,242       2,726       74       311       667  
Construction
    3,208       6,630       4,385                    
Commercial business loans
    614       61       334       692       114       172  
Installment, collateral and other loans
    6       7       11       5       8       6  
                                                 
Total non-accrual loans(2)
    14,366       12,046       10,063       1,178       855       1,666  
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
                                  4,897 (3)
Other accruing loans
                            78        
Troubled debt restructurings
                372       391       560       614  
                                                 
Total non-performing loans
    14,366       12,046       10,435       1,569       1,493       7,177  
Other real estate owned
    2,953       3,061                          
Other non-performing assets
                                   
                                                 
Total non-performing assets
  $ 17,319     $ 15,107     $ 10,435     $ 1,569     $ 1,493     $ 7,177  
                                                 
Total non-performing loans to total loans
    1.03 %     0.88 %     0.80 %     0.14 %     0.14 %     0.83 %(4)
Total non-performing loans to total assets
    .90 %     0.77 %     0.68 %     0.12 %     0.12 %     0.68 %(5)
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
(2) The amount of income that was contractually due but not recognized on non-accrual loans totaled $201,000, $233,000 and $237,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
(3) Balance represents a loan that was fully guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture and was repaid in full in January 2006.
 
(4) The ratio is 0.26% when excluding the $4.9 million fully guaranteed United States Department of Agriculture loan that was past due 90 days and still accruing as of December 31, 2005 which was repaid in full in January, 2006.
 
(5) The ratio is 0.22% when excluding the $4.9 million fully guaranteed United States Department of Agriculture loan that was past due 90 days and still accruing as of December 31, 2005 which was repaid in full in January, 2006.
 
Potential problem loans:   We perform an internal analysis of the loan portfolio in order to identify and quantify loans with higher than normal risk. Loans having a higher risk profile are assigned a risk rating corresponding to the level of weakness identified in the loan. All loans risk rated special mention, substandard or doubtful are reviewed by management on a quarterly basis to assess the level of risk and to ensure that appropriate actions are being taken to minimize potential loss exposure. Loans identified as being “loss” are normally fully charged off. Typically, loans risk rated substandard or more severe are transferred to the special assets area. All special mention, substandard and doubtful loans are included on our “watchlist” which is updated quarterly. See — “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” for further discussion of non-performing assets.
 
At June 30, 2010, $44.3 million of commercial loans and $6.5 million of residential loans were included on the watch list compared to $41.5 million of commercial and $6.3 million of residential loans at December 31, 2009. All watch list loans are individually reviewed and analyzed on at least a quarterly basis to assess risk and possible loss or impairment. Included in the watch list totals are loans risk rated substandard which totaled $29.9 million at June 30, 2010 and $29.4 million at December 31, 2009. These loans are further

84


Table of Contents

reviewed and $14.4 million at June 30, 2010 where considered to be impaired as compared with $12.0 million at December 31, 2009.
 
At June 30, 2010 there was only one loan commitment of $350,000 with an outstanding balance of $75,000 that included a bank funded interest reserve of $25,000. The loan to value ratio, based on commitment amount, was less than 65.0%. All other interest reserves held by the bank were derived from borrower funds independent of loan proceeds.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
We maintain an allowance for loan losses to reflect the level of loss inherent in the loan portfolio. The assessment of loss is comprised of an evaluation of homogeneous loan pools, a specific analysis of loans that are impaired in order to assess the value of the underlying collateral or future cash flows in determining the amount of estimated loss and a general, unallocated pool. In 2007, we adopted certain changes to the allowance for loan and lease losses methodology in order to conform to the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses that was published by federal bank regulatory agencies in December 2006. At December 31, 2006, the unallocated allowance totaled $1.6 million and decreased to $838,000 at December 31, 2007 as the revised methodology resulted in a more precise allocation based on the risk analysis by homogeneous loan type. Continued refinement of the methodology is primarily responsible for the subsequent decreases in the unallocated amount to $212,000 at December 31, 2008, to $209,000 at December 31, 2009 and to $61,000 at June 30, 2010.
 
General Reserve:   Homogenous loan pools are determined by loan type and are comprised of: i) residential first mortgages, ii) commercial real estate mortgages, iii) residential second mortgages, iv) commercial loans, v) construction loans, vi) SBA and USDA guaranteed loans, as well as, smaller loans pools consisting of unsecured consumer loans, collateral loans and auto loans. Each of these loan types is evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine historical loss rates; delinquency; growth and composition trends within the portfolio; the impact of management and underwriting changes; shifts in risk ratings; and regional and economic conditions influencing portfolio performance with management allocating loss factors based on these evaluations.
 
Specific Reserve:   Loans displaying risk characteristics that differentiate themselves from the homogeneous pool are tested separately for impairment. These loans include those in non-accrual status, restructured loans or loans which maybe collateral dependent. Individual evaluations of cash flow or the fair value of collateral supporting these obligations is performed in order to determine the most probable level of loss or impairment. Based on this analysis, specific reserves are assigned to the impaired loan and are incorporated in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance includes a specific component for impaired loans, a general component for pools of outstanding loans and a small unallocated component for model imprecision.
 
Unallocated Reserve:   The unallocated allowance represents the results of an analysis that measures the probable losses inherent in each portfolio. If the allowance for loan losses is too low, we may incur higher provisions for loan loss expense in the future, resulting in lower net income. If an estimate of the allowance for loan losses is too high, we may experience lower provisions for loan loss expense, resulting in higher net income.
 
Review of Credit Quality:   At the time of loan origination, a risk rating based on a nine point grading system is assigned to each loan based on the loan officer’s assessment of risk. More complex loans, such as commercial business loans and commercial real estate, require that our internal independent credit area further evaluate the risk rating of the individual loan, with the credit area having final determination of the appropriate risk rating. These more complex loans and relationships receive an in-depth analysis and periodic review to assess the appropriate risk rating on a post-closing basis with changes made to the risk rating as the borrower’s and economic conditions warrant. The credit quality of our loan portfolio is reviewed by a third-party risk assessment firm and by our internal credit management function. Review findings are reported periodically to senior management, the Board of Directors’ Lending Committee and the Board of Directors. This process is


85


Table of Contents

supplemented with several risk assessment tools including monitoring of delinquency levels, analysis of historical loss experience by loan type, identification of portfolio concentrations by borrower and industry, and a review of economic conditions that might impact loan quality. Based on these findings the allowance for each loan type is evaluated. The allowance for loan losses is calculated on a quarterly basis and reported to the Board of Directors.
 
Any loan that is 90 or more days delinquent is placed on non-accrual status and classified as a non-performing asset. A loan is classified as impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. An allowance is maintained for impaired loans to reflect the difference, if any, between the principal balance of the loan and the present value of projected cash flows, observable fair value or the loan’s collateral value. In addition, our bank regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses as part of their review and examination processes. The regulatory agencies may require that we recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their review or examination.
 
Each quarter, management, in conjunction with the Board of Directors’ Lending Committee, evaluates the total balance of the allowance for loan losses based on several factors some of which are not loan specific, but are reflective of the inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This process includes, but is not limited to, a periodic review of loan collectability in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of loan activity, conditions that may affect the ability of the borrower to repay, underlying value of collateral, if applicable, and economic conditions in our immediate market area. First, loans are grouped by type within each risk weighting classification status. All loans 90 days or more delinquent or classified as trouble debt restructuring are evaluated individually, based primarily on the value of the collateral securing the loan and the ability of the borrower to repay as agreed.
 
Specific loan loss allowances are established as required by this analysis. All loans for which a specific loss allowance has not been assigned are segregated by loan type, delinquency status or loan risk rating grade and a loss allowance is established by using loss experience data and management’s judgment concerning other matters it considers significant including the current economic environment. The allowance is allocated to each category of loan based on the results of the above analysis.
 
This analysis process is both quantitative and subjective as it requires management to make estimates that are susceptible to revisions as more information becomes available. Although we believe that we have established the allowance at levels to absorb probable losses, future additions may be necessary if economic or other conditions in the future differ from the current environment.


86


Table of Contents

Schedule of Allowance for Loan Losses:   The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
 
         
    At or for the Six
 
    Months Ended
 
    June 30, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 12,539  
Provision for loan losses
    1,812  
Charge-offs:
       
Real estate(1)
    (1,155 )
Commercial business loans
    (13 )
Installment and collateral loans
    (51 )
         
Total charge-offs
    (1,219 )
         
Recoveries:
       
Real estate(1)
    3  
Commercial business loans
     
Installment and collateral loans
    9  
         
Total recoveries
    12  
         
Net charge-offs
    (1,207 )
         
Allowance at end of period
  $ 13,144  
         
Ratios:
       
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
    91.49 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding
    0.94 %
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
    0.09 %
 
 
(1) Real estate loans include one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans and construction loans.
 
                                         
    At or for the Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 12,553     $ 10,620     $ 9,827     $ 8,675     $ 6,371  
Provision for loan losses
    1,961       2,393       749       1,681       2,700  
Charge-offs:
                                       
Real estate(1)
    (1,471 )     (257 )     (21 )     (45 )      
Commercial business loans
    (593 )     (314 )     (76 )     (498 )     (591 )
Installment and collateral loans
    (49 )     (50 )     (76 )     (78 )     (55 )
                                         
Total charge-offs
    (2,113 )     (621 )     (173 )     (621 )     (646 )
                                         
Recoveries:
                                       
Real estate(1)
    8       9       5       5       31  
Commercial business loans
    114       122       191       70       209  
Installment and collateral loans
    16       30       21       17       10  
                                         
Total recoveries
    138       161       217       92       250  
                                         
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
    (1,975 )     (460 )     44       (529 )     (396 )
                                         
Allowance at end of year
  $ 12,539     $ 12,553     $ 10,620     $ 9,827     $ 8,675  
                                         
Ratios:
                                       
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of year
    104.09 %     120.30 %     676.86 %     658.20 %     120.87 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of year
    0.91 %     0.96 %     0.94 %     0.94 %     1.00 %
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
    0.15 %     0.04 %     0.00 %     0.05 %     0.05 %


87


Table of Contents

 
(1) Real estate loans include one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans and construction loans.
 
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses:   The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category, the percentage of allowance in each category to total allowance, and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.
 
                         
    At June 30, 2010  
          % of
    % of Loans
 
    Allowance
    Allowance
    in Category
 
    for Loan
    for Loan
    to Total
 
    Losses     Losses     Loans  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Real Estate:
                       
Residential(1)
  $ 4,463       33.95 %     53.55 %
Commercial
    4,838       36.81 %     32.21 %
Construction
    1,443       10.98 %     4.57 %
Commercial business loans
    2,245       17.08 %     9.16 %
Installment, collateral and other
    94       0.72 %     0.51 %
Unallocated allowance
    61       0.46 %      
                         
Total allowance for loan losses
  $ 13,144       100 %     100 %
                         
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
                                                                         
    At December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
          % of
    % of Loans
          % of
    % of Loans
          % of
    % of Loans
 
    Allowance
    Allowance
    in Category
    Allowance
    Allowance
    in Category
    Allowance
    Allowance
    in Category
 
    for Loan
    for Loan
    to Total
    for Loan
    for Loan
    to Total
    for Loan
    for Loan
    to Total
 
    Losses     Losses     Loans     Losses     Losses     Loans     Losses     Losses     Loans  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Real Estate:
                                                                       
Residential(1)
  $ 4,243       33.84 %     54.97 %   $ 3,952       31.48 %     57.26 %   $ 2,673       25.17 %     59.18 %
Commercial
    4,662       37.18       31.03       3,978       31.69       26.97       3,387       31.89       25.28  
Construction
    1,490       11.88       5.18       1,925       15.33       6.84       1,285       12.10       6.27  
Commercial business loans
    1,832       14.61       8.25       2,180       17.37       8.19       2,102       19.79       8.25  
Installment, collateral and other
    103       0.82       0.57       306       2.44       0.74       335       3.16       1.02  
Unallocated allowance
    209       1.67             212       1.69             838       7.89        
                                                                         
Total allowance for loan losses
  $ 12,539       100.00 %     100.00 %   $ 12,553       100.00 %     100.00 %   $ 10,620       100.00 %     100.00 %
                                                                         
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 


88


Table of Contents

                                                 
    At December 31,  
    2006     2005  
          % of
    % of Loans
          % of
    % of Loans
 
    Allowance
    Allowance
    in Category
    Allowance
    Allowance
    in Category
 
    for Loan
    for Loan
    to Total
    for Loan
    for Loan
    to Total
 
    Losses     Losses     Loans     Losses     Losses     Loans  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Real Estate:
                                               
Residential(1)
  $ 1,051       10.70 %     61.46 %   $ 1,035       11.93 %     64.31 %
Commercial
    4,241       43.16       22.33       3,459       39.88       17.19  
Construction
    959       9.76       6.14       707       8.15       5.44  
Commercial business loans
    1,959       19.93       9.34       1,541       17.76       12.59  
Installment, collateral and other
    55       0.56       0.73       27       0.31       0.47  
Unallocated allowance
    1,562       15.89             1,906       21.97        
                                                 
Total allowance for loan losses
  $ 9,827       100.00 %     100.00 %   $ 8,675       100.00 %     100.00 %
                                                 
 
 
(1) Residential loans include one-to-four family mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit.
 
Investment Activities
 
Our Chief Financial Officer is responsible for implementing our investment policy. The investment policy is reviewed annually by management and any changes to the policy are recommended to and are subject to the approval of our Asset Liability Committee, and subsequently the Board of Directors. Authority to make investments under the approved investment policy guidelines is delegated by the Board to the Investment Committee, comprised of our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Executive Vice Presidents, the Chief Financial Officer, our Vice President/Treasury Officer and our Assistant Vice President of Information Technology. While general investment strategies are developed and authorized by the Investment Committee, the execution of specific actions rests with our President, an Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer who may act jointly or severally. In addition, two other officers under the supervision of the Chief Financial Officer have execution authority that is limited to cash management transactions. The Chief Financial Officer is responsible for ensuring that the guidelines and requirements included in the investment policy are followed and that all securities are considered prudent for investment.
 
In addition, we utilize the services of an independent investment advisor to assist in managing the investment portfolio. The investment advisor is responsible for maintaining current information regarding securities dealers with whom we are conducting business. A list of appropriate dealers is provided at least annually to the Board of Directors for approval and authorization, and new securities dealers are approved prior to the execution of trades. The investment advisor, through its assigned portfolio manager, must contact the Investment Committee to review all investment recommendations and transactions and receive approval from the Investment Committee prior to execution of any transaction.
 
Our investment policy requires that all securities transactions be conducted in a safe and sound manner. Investment decisions must be based upon a thorough analysis of each security instrument to determine its credit quality and fit within our overall asset/liability management objectives, its effect on our risk-based capital and the overall prospects for yield and/or appreciation.

89


Table of Contents

Investment Securities Portfolio:   The following table sets forth the carrying values of our available for sale securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
 
                                                                 
    At June 30,     At December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007  
    Amortized
    Fair
    Amortized
    Fair
    Amortized
    Fair
    Amortized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Value     Cost     Value     Cost     Value     Cost     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
Available for Sale:
                                                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 29,002     $ 29,150     $ 7,017     $ 7,052     $ 2,031     $ 2,048     $ 14,016     $ 14,036  
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities
    61,348       65,500       72,537       75,967       117,517       120,395       96,494       97,096  
Corporate debt securities
    5,881       4,720       5,879       4,656       4,831       4,887       4,068       3,863  
Other debt securities
    250       254       722       731       725       739       978       995  
Marketable equity securities
    11,259       14,423       10,509       14,345       10,437       12,940       15,744       20,141  
Other equity securities
                            241       241       241       241  
                                                                 
Total available for sale
  $ 107,740     $ 114,047     $ 96,664     $ 102,751     $ 135,782     $ 141,250     $ 131,541     $ 136,372  
                                                                 
 
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $65,000 related to one mutual fund. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the security as of the date of impairment. Our remaining investment in this mutual fund was $1.4 million with a $76,000 unrealized gain and $1.4 million with a $55,000 unrealized gain at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $297,000 related to five common stock securities. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the securities as of the date of impairment. Our remaining investment in these five common stock securities was $781,000 with a $244,000 unrealized gain and $648,000 with a net $133,000 unrealized loss at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. There have been no other-than-temporary impairment of securities in 2010. We will continue to review the entire portfolio for other-than-temporarily impaired securities with additional attention being given to high risk securities such as the one pooled trust preferred security that we own.
 
We implemented new accounting guidance during 2009 (See Note 2 — “Basis of Presentation, Principles of Consolidation and Significant Accounting Policies” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements) which was applied to existing debt securities we held as of December 31, 2008. For those debt securities for which the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost and we do not intend to sell such security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell such security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any credit losses, the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment losses is recognized in earnings while the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of related taxes. As a result, we reclassified the non-credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment loss previously recognized in earnings during 2008 for two corporate debt securities — GE Capital Corporation and PRETSL XXVIII. The reclassification was reflected as a cumulative effect adjustment of $1.0 million ($1.6 million before taxes) that increased retained earnings and increased accumulated other comprehensive loss. The amortized cost basis of these debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized during 2008 were adjusted by the amount of the cumulative effect adjustment before taxes.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $11.6 million related to the preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as a result of actions taken in the third quarter of 2008 to place those agencies into conservatorship. Our remaining investment in these securities was $283,000 with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.1 million related to one AAA rated pooled trust preferred security. The charge for the impairment was based on a Level 3 price for the pooled


90


Table of Contents

trust preferred security as of the date of the impairment. Our remaining investment in this pooled trust preferred security was $1.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $587,000 related to one mutual fund. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the security as of the date of the impairment. Our remaining investment in this mutual fund was $1.7 million with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $493,000 related to one AAA rated corporate debt security. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the security as of the date of the impairment. Our remaining investment in this corporate debt security was $2.4 million with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.1 million related to eleven common stock securities. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing prices of the securities as of the date of the impairment. Our remaining investment in these eleven common stock securities was $1.7 million with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. We will continue to review our entire portfolio for other than temporarily impaired securities with additional attention being given to high risk securities such as the preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and the one pooled trust preferred security that we own.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $233,000 related to the preferred stock of a U.S. government-sponsored enterprise. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the security as of the date of the impairment. Our remaining investment in this security was $544,000 with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2007.
 
Consistent with our overall business and asset/liability management strategy, which focuses on sustaining adequate levels of core earnings, most securities purchased were classified available for sale at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
 
U.S. Government and Government-Sponsored Enterprises:   At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise portfolio totaled $29.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, all of which were classified as available for sale. There were no structured notes or derivatives in the portfolio.
 
Government-Sponsored Enterprise Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities:   We purchase mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies and government-sponsored entities, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. We invest in mortgage-backed securities to achieve positive interest rate spreads with minimal administrative expense, and lower our credit risk as a result of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.
 
Mortgage-backed securities are created by the pooling of mortgages and the issuance of a security with an interest rate which is less than the interest rate on the underlying mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities typically represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multi-family mortgages, although we focus our investments on mortgage-backed securities backed by one-to-four family mortgages. The issuers of such securities pool and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors such as us and guarantee the payment of principal and interest to investors. Mortgage-backed securities generally yield less than the loans that underlie such securities because of the cost of payment guarantees, mortgage servicing and credit enhancements. However, mortgage-backed securities are usually more liquid than individual mortgage loans and may be used to collateralize our borrowing obligations.
 
At June 30, 2010, the carrying value of mortgage-backed securities totaled $82.2 million, or 5.1% of assets and 5.4% of interest earning assets, $65.5 million of which were classified as available for sale and $16.7 million of which were classified as held to maturity, compared to the carrying value of mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2009 which totaled $95.0 million, or 6.1% of assets and 6.4% of interest-earning assets, $76.0 million of which were classified as available for sale and $19.0 million of which were classified as held to maturity. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, 14% and 13% of the mortgage-backed securities were backed by adjustable rate loans and 86% and 87% were backed by fixed rate mortgage loans. The available for sale mortgage-backed securities portfolio had a book yield of 5.13% at June 30, 2010, compared to a book yield of 5.16% at December 31, 2009 and the held to maturity mortgage-backed securities


91


Table of Contents

portfolio had a book yield of 5.36% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The estimated fair value of our mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2010 was $83.6 million, which is $5.5 million more than the amortized cost of $781 million, and at December 31, 2009 was $96.0 million, which is $4.4 million more than the amortized cost of $91.6 million at the date. Investments in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual prepayments may differ from estimated prepayments over the life of the security, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount relating to such instruments, thereby changing the net yield on such securities. There is also reinvestment risk associated with the cash flows from such securities. In addition, the market value of such securities may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates.
 
Our investment portfolio contained no mortgage-backed securities that are subject to the risk of “sub-prime” lending as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009. Though we do not have a direct exposure to sub-prime related assets, the value and related income of our mortgage-backed securities are sensitive to changes in economic conditions, including delinquencies and/or defaults on the underlying mortgages. Though we have not been adversely affected by recent events affecting the mortgage industry, continuing shifts in the market’s perception of credit quality on securities backed by residential mortgage loans may result in increased volatility of market price and periods of illiquidity that can have a negative impact upon the valuation of certain securities held by us.
 
Corporate Bonds:   At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of our corporate bond portfolio totaled $4.7 million, all of which was classified as available for sale. The corporate bond portfolio reprices quarterly to LIBOR and had a book yield of 0.81% at June 30, 2010 and 0.67% at December 31, 2009. Although corporate bonds may offer higher yields than U.S. Treasury or agency securities of comparable duration, corporate bonds also have a higher risk of default due to possible adverse changes in the credit-worthiness of the issuer. In order to mitigate this risk, our investment policy requires that corporate debt obligation purchases be rated “A” or better by a nationally recognized rating agency. A security that is subsequently downgraded below investment grade will require additional analysis of credit worthiness and a determination will be made to hold or dispose of the investment.
 
Other Debt Securities:   These securities consist primarily of obligations issued by states, counties and municipalities or their agencies and include general obligation bonds, industrial development revenue bonds and other revenue bonds. Our investment policy requires that such state agency or municipal obligation purchases be rated “A” or better by a nationally recognized rating agency. A security that is subsequently downgraded below investment grade will require additional analysis of credit worthiness and a determination will be made to hold or dispose of the investment. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our state agency and municipal obligations portfolio totaled $254,000 and $731,000, respectively.
 
Marketable Equity Securities:   We currently maintain a diversified equity securities portfolio. At June 30, 2010, the fair value of our marketable equity securities portfolio totaled $14.4 million, or 0.9% of total assets, all of which were classified as available for sale, compared to the fair value of our marketable equity securities portfolio at December 31, 2009, which totaled $14.3 million, which was 0.9% of total assets, all of which were classified as available for sale. At June 30, 2010, the portfolio consisted of $11.4 million of diversified common stock, $0.2 million of preferred stock issued by government-sponsored entities and $2.8 million of mutual funds. The portfolio consisted of $11.1 million of diversified common stock, $0.5 million of preferred stock issued by government-sponsored entities and $2.7 million of mutual funds at December 31, 2009. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the maximum investment in any single issuer was $2.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively. The industries represented by our common stock investments are diverse and include banking, insurance and financial services, integrated utilities and various industrial sectors. Our investments in preferred stock consisted of investments in two government-sponsored enterprises, and the maximum investment in any single issuer was $287,000 as of December 31, 2009 and $96,000 as of June 30, 2010. The total equity portfolio will not exceed 100% of the Tier I capital of Rockville Bank.
 
Investments in equity securities involve risk as they are not insured or guaranteed investments and are affected by stock market fluctuations. Such investments are carried at their market value and can directly affect our net capital position.


92


Table of Contents

Portfolio Maturities and Yields:   The composition and maturities of the investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized in the following tables. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions that may occur. State agency and municipal obligations as well as common and preferred stock yields have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis. Certain mortgage-backed securities have interest rates that are adjustable and will reprice annually within the various maturity ranges. These repricing schedules are not reflected in the table below. At June 30, 2010, mortgage-backed securities with adjustable rates totaled $11.7 million and at December 31, 2009, mortgage-backed securities with adjustable rates totaled $12.6 million.
 
                                                                                 
          More than One Year
    More than Five Years
             
    One Year or Less     Through Five Years     Through Ten Years     More than Ten Years     Total Securities  
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
 
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
 
June 30, 2010
  Value     Yield     Value     Yield     Value     Yield     Value     Yield     Value     Yield  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Available for Sale
                                                                               
Debt Securities:
                                                                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 2,009       .36 %   $ 5,020       3.41 %   $ 22,121       3.59 %   $       %   $ 29,150       3.34 %
Mortgage-backed securities
                2,438       4.35       412       6.26       62,650       5.16       65,500       5.13  
Corporate debt securities
    100       4.91       2,895       .40                   1,725       1.09       4,720       .81  
Other debt securities
                            254       3.94                   254       3.94  
                                                                                 
Total debt securities
  $ 2,109       .58 %   $ 10,353       2.79 %   $ 22,787       3.64 %   $ 64,375       5.05 %     99,624       4.40 %
                                                                                 
Marketable equity securities
                                                                    14,423          
                                                                                 
Total securities available for sale
                                                                  $ 114,047          
                                                                                 
 
                                                                                 
          More than One Year
    More than Five Years
             
    One Year or Less     Through Five Years     Through Ten Years     More than Ten Years     Total Securities  
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
 
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
    Fair
    Average
 
December 31, 2009
  Value     Yield     Value     Yield     Value     Yield     Value     Yield     Value     Yield  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Available for Sale
                                                                               
Debt Securities:
                                                                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 2,018       0.36 %   $ 5,035       3.41 %   $       %   $       %   $ 7,053       2.53 %
Mortgage-backed securities
                1,780       4.01       1,909       5.13       72,278       5.18       75,967       5.16  
Corporate debt securities
                2,971       0.55                   1,684       0.80       4,655       0.67  
Other debt securities
                            731       4.49                   731       4.49  
                                                                                 
Total debt securities
  $ 2,018       0.36 %   $ 9,786       2.65 %   $ 2,640       4.95 %   $ 73,962       5.08 %     88,406       4.70 %
                                                                                 
Marketable equity securities
                                                                    14,345          
                                                                                 
Total securities available for sale
                                                                  $ 102,751          
                                                                                 
 
Sources of Funds
 
General:   Deposits have traditionally been our primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities. In addition to deposits, funds are derived from scheduled loan payments, investment maturities, loan prepayments, retained earnings and income on earning assets. See “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Liquidity and Capital Resources”.


93


Table of Contents

Deposits:   A majority of our depositors are persons who work or reside in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties and, to a lesser extent, other northeastern Connecticut communities. We offer a selection of deposit instruments, including checking, savings, money market savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts and fixed-rate time deposits. Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate. We had $18.3 million and $14.3 million brokered deposits at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, through participation in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service reciprocal deposit program. We did not have any borrowings from deposit brokers at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
 
Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies, market rates, liquidity requirements, rates paid by competitors and growth goals. To attract and retain deposits, we rely upon personalized customer service, long-standing relationships and competitive interest rates.
 
The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and other prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts that we offer allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and responding to changes in consumer demand. Based on historical experience, management believes our deposits are relatively stable. Expansion of the branch network and the commercial banking division, as well as deposit promotions and disintermediation from investment firms due to increasing uncertainty in the financial markets, has provided us with opportunities to attract new deposit relationships.
 
It is unclear whether the recent growth in deposits will reflect our historical, stable experience with deposit customers. The ability to attract and maintain money market accounts and time deposits, and the rates paid on these deposits, has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions. At June 30, 2010, $480.5 million or 41.8% of our deposits were time deposits, of which $305.9 million had maturities as of one year or less. At December 31, 2009, $491.9 million, or 43.6%, of our deposit accounts were time deposits, of which $359.8 million had maturities of one year or less.
 
The following table displays a summary of our deposits as of the dates indicated:
 
                                                                                                 
    At June 30, 2010     At December 31,  
                      2009     2008     2007  
                Weighted-
                Weighted-
                Weighted-
                Weighted-
 
                Average
                Average
                Average
                Average
 
    Balance     Percent     Rate     Balance     Percent     Rate     Balance     Percent     Rate     Balance     Percent     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Deposit type:
                                                                                               
Demand deposits
  $ 157,377       13.7 %     0.00 %   $ 150,484       13.3 %     0.00 %   $ 116,113       11.1 %     0.00 %   $ 99,378       10.5 %     0.00 %
NOW accounts
    111,791       9.7       0.31       108,099       9.6       0.34       86,943       8.4       0.43       85,854       9.0       0.51  
Regular savings
    159,704       13.9       0.30       143,601       12.7       0.30       121,527       11.7       0.60       121,800       12.8       0.60  
Money market and investment savings
    240,194       20.9       0.52       234,737       20.8       0.65       188,110       18.0       1.78       120,971       12.7       3.15  
Club accounts
    834       0.1       2.04       247       0.0       2.04       227       0.0       2.04       216       0.0       2.04  
                                                                                                 
Total core accounts
    669,900       58.2       0.31       637,168       56.4       0.36       512,920       49.2       0.87       428,219       45.0       1.16  
Time deposits
    480,479       41.8       1.98       491,940       43.6       2.29       529,588       50.8       3.57       522,819       55.0       4.49  
                                                                                                 
Total deposits
  $ 1,150,379       100.0 %     1.01 %   $ 1,129,108       100.0 %     1.20 %   $ 1,042,508       100.0 %     2.24 %   $ 951,038       100.0 %     2.99 %
                                                                                                 


94


Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate amount of outstanding time deposits in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was $168.8 million. As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of outstanding time deposits in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was $168.5 million. The following table sets forth the maturity of those time deposits as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively:
 
                 
    At
    At
 
    June 30,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
 
Three months or less
  $ 34,864     $ 47,890  
Over three months through six months
    41,976       26,563  
Over six months through one year
    30,940       52,149  
Over one year through three years
    42,318       37,537  
Over three years
    18,711       4,338  
                 
Total
  $ 168,809     $ 168,477  
                 
 
The following table sets forth the time deposits classified by interest rate as of the dates indicated:
 
                                 
    June 30,     At December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Interest Rate:
                               
0.00% — 1.00%
  $ 111,932     $ 56,155     $ 1,987     $ 1,178  
1.01% — 2.00%
    193,965       204,712       632       1,002  
2.01% — 3.00%
    94,531       101,412       132,356       60,161  
3.01% — 4.00%
    43,025       82,360       296,257       42,480  
4.01% — 5.00%
    33,047       42,259       87,475       327,519  
5.01% — 6.00%
    3,978       5,042       10,881       90,479  
                                 
Total
  $ 480,479     $ 491,940     $ 529,588     $ 522,819  
                                 
 
The following table sets forth the amounts and maturities of time deposits at June 30, 2010:
 
                                                                 
                Over Two
    Over
                      Percentage of
 
          Over One
    Years to
    Three
    Over Four
                Total Time
 
    One Year
    Year to Two
    Three
    Years to
    Years to
                Deposit
 
    and Under     Years     Years     Four Years     Five Years     Thereafter     Total     Accounts  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Interest Rate
                                                               
0.00% — 1.00%
  $ 111,175     $ 757     $     $     $     $     $ 111,932       23.31 %
1.01% — 2.00%
    142,437       50,272       1,462                         194,171       40.41  
2.01% — 3.00%
    34,257       34,339       10,892       3,275       11,479       83       94,325       19.63  
3.01% — 4.00%
    5,755       2,855       8,733       3,121       22,529       32       43,025       8.95  
4.01% — 5.00%
    11,197       11,379       7,044       1,742       283       1,378       33,023       6.87  
5.01% — 6.00%
    1,114       1,946       706       213             24       4,003       0.83  
                                                                 
Total
  $ 305,935     $ 101,548     $ 28,837     $ 8,351     $ 34,291     $ 1,517     $ 480,479       100.00 %
                                                                 


95


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the amounts and maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2009:
 
                                                                 
                Over Two
    Over
                      Percentage of
 
          Over One
    Years to
    Three
    Over Four
                Total Time
 
    One Year
    Year to Two
    Three
    Years to
    Years to
                Deposit
 
    and Under     Years     Years     Four Years     Five Years     Thereafter     Total     Accounts  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Interest Rate at December 31, 2009:
                                                               
0.00% — 1.00%
  $ 56,150     $ 5     $     $     $     $     $ 56,155       11.42 %
1.01% — 2.00%
    182,145       22,475       92                         204,712       41.61  
2.01% — 3.00%
    40,919       47,703       4,552       767       7,471             101,412       20.62  
3.01% — 4.00%
    62,276       4,958       3,679       8,401       3,046             82,360       16.74  
4.01% — 5.00%
    16,238       9,242       10,306       4,435       461       1,577       42,259       8.59  
5.01% — 6.00%
    2,029       1,533       1,207       249             24       5,042       1.02  
                                                                 
Total
  $ 359,757     $ 85,916     $ 19,836     $ 13,852     $ 10,978     $ 1,601     $ 491,940       100.00 %
                                                                 
 
The following table sets forth the interest-bearing deposit activities for the periods indicated:
 
                                 
    Six Months Ended
       
    June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2007  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
Beginning balance
  $ 978,624     $ 926,395     $ 851,660     $ 791,443  
Net increase in deposits before interest credited
    8,525       32,858       49,666       33,136  
Interest credited
    5,853       19,371       25,069       27,081  
                                 
Net increase in deposits
    14,378       52,229       74,735       60,217  
                                 
Ending balance
  $ 993,002     $ 978,624     $ 926,395     $ 851,660  
                                 
 
Borrowed Funds
 
Our borrowings consist solely of advances from and a line of credit with the FHLBB. At June 30, 2010 at December 31, 2009, we had an available line of credit with the FHLBB in the amount of $10.0 million and access to additional Federal Home Loan Bank advances of up to $146.5 million. Internal policies limit borrowings to 30% of total assets, or $480.6 million and $471.3 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
 
Subsidiary Activities
 
Rockville Bank is currently the only subsidiary of Existing Rockville Financial and is incorporated in Connecticut. Rockville Bank currently has the following subsidiaries all of which are incorporated in Connecticut: SBR Mortgage Company, SBR Investment Corp., Inc., Rockville Financial Services, Inc., Rockville Bank Commercial Properties, Inc., Rockville Bank Residential Properties, Inc. and Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc.
 
SBR Mortgage Company:   Established in December 1998, SBR Mortgage Company operates as Rockville Bank’s “passive investment company” (“PIC”) which exempts it from Connecticut income tax under current law.
 
SBR Investment Corp., Inc.:   Established in January 1995, SBR Investment Corp., Inc. was established to maintain an ownership interest in Infinex Investments, Inc. (“Infinex”) a third-party, non-affiliated registered broker-dealer. Infinex provides broker-dealer services for a number of banks, to their customers, including Rockville Bank’s customers through Rockville Financial Services, Inc.


96


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial Services, Inc.:   Established in May 2002, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. currently offers brokerage and investment advisory services through a contract with Infinex. In addition, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. offers customers a range of non-deposit investment products including mutual funds, debt, equity and government securities, retirement accounts, insurance products and fixed and variable annuities at all Rockville Bank locations. Rockville Financial Services, Inc. receives a portion of the commissions generated by Infinex from sales to customers. For the period ended June 30, 2010, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. received fees of $174,000 through its relationship with Infinex. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Rockville Financial Services, Inc. received fees of $404,000.
 
Rockville Bank Commercial Properties, Inc.:   Established in May 2009, Rockville Bank Commercial Properties, Inc. was established to hold certain commercial real estate acquired through foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or other similar means.
 
Rockville Bank Residential Properties, Inc.:   Established in May 2009, Rockville Bank Residential Properties, Inc. was established to hold certain residential real estate acquired through foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or other similar means.
 
Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc.:   In September 2009, we entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of Family Choice Mortgage Company. The transaction closed in January 2010 and now operates through Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc., doing business as “Family Choice Mortgage Company.” The acquisition was made to expand our mortgage origination business.
 
Charitable Foundation
 
Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc., a private charitable foundation, was established in May 2005 in connection with our minority stock issuance. This foundation, which is not a subsidiary, provides grants to non-profit organizations within the communities that we serve. In 2005, we contributed $3.9 million in stock to the foundation in connection with the minority stock issuance. No contributions were made to the foundation during 2009. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman of our Board of Directors currently serve on the board of directors of the foundation. Subject to shareholder, corporator and regulatory approval, we plan to contribute cash equal to 3.0% of the net offering proceeds to the charitable foundation.
 
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
 
We owned $10.3 million and $10.1 million Bank-Owned Life Insurance at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These policies were purchased in 2003 and 2004 for the purpose of protecting Rockville Bank against the cost/loss due to the death of key employees and to offset Rockville Bank’s future obligations to its employees under various retirement and benefit plans.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
We are subject to certain pending and threatened legal actions which arise out of the normal course of our business, including typical customer claims and counterclaims arising out of the retain banking and mortgage banking business. We believe that the resolution of any pending or threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
 
Personnel
 
At June 30, 2010, we had 216 full-time equivalent employees, none of whom are represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.


97


Table of Contents

 
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
 
General
 
Rockville Bank, a Connecticut-chartered stock savings bank, is subject to extensive regulation by the Connecticut Banking Department, as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, as its deposit insurer. Rockville Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC through the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund. Rockville Bank is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the Connecticut Banking Department concerning its activities and financial condition and must obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial institutions. Existing Rockville Financial, as a bank holding company is, and at the completion of the conversion, New Rockville Financial will be, subject to regulation by and required to file reports with the Connecticut Department of Banking, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
The following discussion of other laws and regulations material to our operations is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such laws and regulations. Any change in such regulations, whether by the Connecticut Department of Banking, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board or the Securities and Exchange Commission, could have a material adverse impact on us.
 
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
 
On July 21, 2010, the President of the United States signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). This new law will significantly change the current bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the impacts of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many months or years.
 
The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Rockville Bank, as a bank with $10 billion or less in assets, will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by our primary bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorney generals the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.
 
The Dodd-Frank Act requires minimum leverage (Tier 1) and risk based capital requirements for bank and savings and loan holding companies that are no less than those applicable to banks, which will exclude certain instruments that previously have been eligible for inclusion by bank holding companies as Tier 1 capital, such as trust preferred securities.
 
A provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, which will become effective one year after enactment, eliminates the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses to have interest-bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant change to existing law could have an adverse impact on our interest expense. The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for FDIC deposit insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution, rather than deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and non-interest-bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. The legislation also increases the required minimum reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund, from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits, and directs the FDIC to offset the effects of increased assessments on depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.


98


Table of Contents

Under the Dodd-Frank Act we will be required to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments. The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using our proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.
 
It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks. However, it is expected that at a minimum they will increase our operating and compliance costs and could increase our interest expense.
 
Connecticut Banking Laws and Supervision
 
Connecticut Banking Commissioner:   The Connecticut Banking Commissioner regulates internal organization as well as the deposit, lending and investment activities of state chartered banks, including Rockville Bank. The approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner is required for, among other things, the establishment of branch offices and business combination transactions. The Commissioner conducts periodic examinations of Connecticut-chartered banks. The FDIC also regulates many of the areas regulated by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, and federal law may limit some of the authority provided to Connecticut-chartered banks by Connecticut law.
 
Lending Activities:   Connecticut banking laws grant banks broad lending authority. With certain limited exceptions, any one obligor under this statutory authority may not exceed 10.0% and 15.0%, respectively, of a bank’s capital and allowance for loan losses.
 
Dividends:   Rockville Bank may pay cash dividends out of its net profits. For purposes of this restriction, “net profits” represents the remainder of all earnings from current operations. Further, the total amount of all dividends declared by a savings bank in any year may not exceed the sum of a bank’s net profits for the year in question combined with its retained net profits from the preceding two years. Federal law also prevents an institution from paying dividends or making other capital distributions that, if by doing so, would cause it to become “undercapitalized.” The FDIC may limit a savings bank’s ability to pay dividends. No dividends may be paid to Rockville Bank’s shareholder if such dividends would reduce stockholders’ equity below the amount of the liquidation account required by the Connecticut conversion regulations.
 
Powers:   Connecticut law permits Connecticut banks to sell insurance and fixed and variable rate annuities if licensed to do so by the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner. With the prior approval of the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner, Connecticut banks are also authorized to engage in a broad range of activities related to the business of banking, or that are financial in nature or that are permitted under the Bank Holding Company Act or the Home Owners’ Loan Act, both federal statutes, or the regulations promulgated as a result of these statutes. Connecticut banks are also authorized to engage in any activity permitted for a national bank or a federal savings association upon filing notice with the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner unless the Insurance Commissioner disapproves the activity.
 
Assessments:   Connecticut banks are required to pay annual assessments to the Connecticut Banking Department to fund the Department’s operations. The general assessments are paid pro-rata based upon a bank’s asset size.
 
Enforcement:   Under Connecticut law, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner has extensive enforcement authority over Connecticut banks and, under certain circumstances, affiliated parties, insiders, and agents. The Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s enforcement authority includes cease and desist orders, fines, receivership, conservatorship, removal of officers and directors, emergency closures, dissolution and liquidation.
 
Holding Company Regulation
 
General:   As a bank holding company, Existing Rockville Financial is, and New Rockville Financial will be upon completion of the conversion and offering, subject to comprehensive regulation and regular


99


Table of Contents

examinations by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to require that a holding company divest subsidiaries (including its bank subsidiaries). In general, enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
 
Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company must serve as a source of strength for its subsidiary bank. Under this policy, the Federal Reserve Board may require, and has required in the past, a holding company to contribute additional capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank. As a bank holding company, New Rockville Financial must obtain Federal Reserve Board approval before: (i) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5.0% of such shares (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares); (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. Under Connecticut banking law, no person may acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of any class of voting securities of a Connecticut-chartered bank, or any bank holding company of such a bank, without prior notification of, and lack of disapproval by, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner.
 
The Banking Holding Company Act also prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5.0% of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities which, by statute or by Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks. The list of activities permitted by the Federal Reserve Board includes, among other things: (i) operating a savings institution, mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company; (ii) performing certain data processing operations; (iii) providing certain investment and financial advice; (iv) underwriting and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance; (v) leasing property on a full-payout, non-operating basis; (vi) selling money orders, travelers’ checks and United States savings bonds; (vii) real estate and personal property appraising; (viii) providing tax planning and preparation services; (ix) financing and investing in certain community development activities; and (x) subject to certain limitations, providing securities brokerage services for customers.
 
Dividends:   The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the Federal Reserve Board’s view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the holding company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Reserve Board may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized.”
 
Pursuant to Connecticut banking regulations, during the three-year period following the conversion and the offering, New Rockville Financial may not take any action to declare an extraordinary dividend to shareholders, and no dividend will be paid to shareholders if such dividends would reduce our stockholders’ equity below the amount of the liquidation account required to be established in connection with the conversion. In addition, New Rockville Financial will be subject to state law limitations on the payment of dividends. Connecticut law generally restricts dividends from being made if a corporation is not able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course or its total assets would be less than its total liabilities plus any payments that would be owed upon dissolution to shareholders whose preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the dividend.
 
Redemption:   Bank holding companies are required to give the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the


100


Table of Contents

purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10.0% or more of the consolidated net worth of the bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. This notification requirement does not apply to any company that meets the well capitalized standard for commercial banks, is “well managed” within the meaning of the Federal Reserve Board regulations and is not subject to any unresolved supervisory issues.
 
Federal Regulations
 
Capital Requirements:   Under FDIC regulations, federally insured state-chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System (“state non-member banks”), such as Rockville Bank, are required to comply with minimum leverage capital requirements. For an institution determined by the FDIC to not be anticipating or experiencing significant growth and to be, in general, a strong banking organization, rated composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Ranking System established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, the minimum capital leverage requirement is a ratio of Tier I capital to total assets of 3.0%. For all other institutions, the minimum leverage capital ratio is 4.0%. Tier I capital is the sum of common stockholders’ equity, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock (including any related surplus) and minority investments in certain subsidiaries, less intangible assets (except for certain servicing rights and credit card relationships) and certain other specified items.
 
The FDIC regulations require state non-member banks to maintain certain levels of regulatory capital in relation to regulatory risk-weighted assets. The ratio of regulatory capital to regulatory risk-weighted assets is referred to as a bank’s “risk-based capital ratio.” Risk-based capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet items (including recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes and residual interests) to four risk-weighted categories ranging from 0.0% to 100.0%, with higher levels of capital being required for the categories perceived as representing greater risk. For example, under the FDIC’s risk-weighting system, cash and securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government are given a 0.0% risk weight, loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties generally have a 50.0% risk weight, and commercial loans have a risk weighting of 100.0%.
 
State non-member banks such as Rockville Bank, must maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, of which at least one-half must be Tier I capital. Total capital consists of Tier I capital plus Tier 2 or supplementary capital items, which include allowances for loan losses in an amount of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, cumulative preferred stock and certain other capital instruments, and a portion of the net unrealized gain on equity securities. The includable amount of Tier 2 capital cannot exceed the amount of the institution’s Tier I capital. Banks that engage in specified levels of trading activities are subject to adjustments in their risk based capital calculation to ensure the maintenance of sufficient capital to support market risk.
 
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act required each federal banking agency to revise its risk-based capital standards for insured institutions to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest-rate risk, concentration of credit risk, and the risk of nontraditional activities, as well as to reflect the actual performance and expected risk of loss on multi-family residential loans. The FDIC, along with the other federal banking agencies, has adopted a regulation providing that the agencies will take into account the exposure of a bank’s capital and economic value to changes in interest rate risk in assessing a bank’s capital adequacy. The FDIC also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon determination that an institution’s capital level is, or is likely to become, inadequate in light of the particular circumstances.
 
As a bank holding company, Existing Rockville Financial is, and New Rockville Financial will be, subject to capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies similar to those of the FDIC for state-chartered banks. Existing Rockville Financial’s stockholders’ equity exceeds and, on a pro forma basis, New Rockville Financial’s stockholders’ equity will exceed these requirements.


101


Table of Contents

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action:   Federal law requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized.
 
The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation. An institution is deemed to be “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. An institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater, and generally a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater. An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, or generally a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%. An institution is deemed to be “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%. An institution is considered to be “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Rockville Bank was a “well capitalized” institution.
 
“Undercapitalized” banks must adhere to growth, capital distribution (including dividend) and other limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. A bank’s compliance with such a plan is required to be guaranteed by any company that controls the undercapitalized institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0% of the institution’s total assets when deemed undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve the status of adequately capitalized. If an “undercapitalized” bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.” “Significantly undercapitalized” banks must comply with one or more of a number of additional restrictions, including but not limited to an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets, cease receipt of deposits from correspondent banks or dismiss directors or officers, and restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, compensation of executive officers and capital distributions by the parent holding company. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to additional measures including, subject to a narrow exception, the appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after it obtains such status.
 
Transactions with Affiliates:   Under current federal law, transactions between depository institutions and their affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (the “FRA”). In a holding company context, at a minimum, the parent holding company of a savings bank and any companies which are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the savings bank. Generally, Section 23A limits the extent to which the savings bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to 10.0% of such savings bank’s capital stock and surplus, and contains an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to 20.0% of capital stock and surplus. The term “covered transaction” includes, among other things, the making of loans or other extensions of credit to an affiliate and the purchase of assets from an affiliate. Section 23A also establishes specific collateral requirements for loans or extensions of credit to, or guarantees, acceptances on letters of credit issued on behalf of an affiliate. Section 23B requires that covered transactions and a broad list of other specified transactions be on terms substantially the same, or no less favorable, to the savings bank or its subsidiary as similar transactions with non-affiliates.
 
Loans to Insiders:   Further, Section 22(h) of the FRA restricts an institution with respect to loans to directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders (“insiders”). Under Section 22(h), loans to insiders and their related interests may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated entities, the institution’s total capital and surplus. Loans to insiders above specified amounts must receive the prior approval of the Board of Directors. Further, under Section 22(h), loans to Directors, executive officers and principal shareholders must be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons, except that such insiders may receive preferential loans made under a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to the bank’s employees and does not give preference to the insider over the employees. Section 22(g) of the FRA places additional limitations on loans to executive officers.
 
Enforcement:   The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured savings banks, including Rockville Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money


102


Table of Contents

penalties, issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
 
The FDIC has authority under Federal law to appoint a conservator or receiver for an insured bank under limited circumstances. The FDIC is required, with certain exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state non-member bank if that bank was “critically undercapitalized” on average during the calendar quarter beginning 270 days after the date on which the institution became “critically undercapitalized.” The FDIC may also appoint itself as conservator or receiver for an insured state non-member institution under specific circumstances on the basis of the institution’s financial condition or upon the occurrence of other events, including: (1) insolvency; (2) substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices; (3) existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business; and (4) insufficient capital, or the incurring of losses that will deplete substantially all of the institution’s capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment without federal assistance.
 
Insurance of Deposit Accounts:   The FDIC has adopted a risk-based insurance assessment system. The FDIC assigns an institution to one of three capital categories based on the institution’s financial condition consisting of (1) well capitalized, (2) adequately capitalized or (3) undercapitalized, and one of three supervisory subcategories within each capital group. The supervisory subgroup to which an institution is assigned is based on a supervisory evaluation provided to the FDIC by the institution’s primary federal regulator and information which the FDIC determines to be relevant to the institution’s financial condition and the risk posed to the Deposit Insurance Fund. An institution’s assessment rate depends on the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned. Assessment rates for insurance fund deposits range from 12 basis points for the strongest institution to 50 basis points for the weakest after a uniform increase of 7 basis points effective January 1, 2009. FDIC members are also required to assist in the repayment of bonds issued by the Financing Corporation in the late 1980’s to recapitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.
 
In October 2008, the FDIC approved the increased insurance limit of $250,000 per regular account and is currently effective through 2013, after which the standard coverage limit will return to $100,000 for all deposit categories except certain retirement accounts which will continue to be insured up to $250,000. Unlimited deposit insurance coverage was available through June 30, 2010, for non-interest-bearing transaction accounts at Rockville Bank, as it is participating in FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Additionally, the FDIC approved a plan for rebuilding the Deposit Insurance Fund after several bank failures in 2008. The FDIC plan aims to rebuild the Deposit Insurance Fund within five years; the first assessment increase was a uniform seven basis points effective January 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the total FDIC assessments were $2.2 million, $654,000 and $229,000, respectively. In November 2009, the FDIC issued new regulations requiring insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The prepaid assessments for these periods were collected on December 30, 2009 and totaled $5.9 million for Rockville Bank. The FDIC has exercised its authority to raise assessment rates for 2009, and may raise insurance premiums in the future. If such action is taken by the FDIC it could have an adverse effect on our earnings.
 
The FDIC may terminate insurance of deposits if it finds that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not know of any practice, condition or violations that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
 
Federal Reserve System:   The Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository institutions to maintain non-interest-earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The Federal Reserve Board regulations generally require that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts. We are in compliance with these requirements.
 
Federal Home Loan Bank System:   Rockville Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”), which is one of the regional Federal Home Loan Banks composing the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Each Federal Home Loan Bank serves as a central credit facility primarily for its member institutions. Rockville Bank, as a member of the FHLBB, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital


103


Table of Contents

stock in the FHLBB. While the required percentages of stock ownership are subject to change by the FHLBB, we were in compliance with this requirement with an investment in FHLBB stock at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. In the past, we had received dividends on our Federal Home Loan Bank stock. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, our cash dividends from the Federal Home Loan Bank amounted to approximately $473,000 and $658,000, respectively. On January 28, 2009, the FHLBB notified its members of its focus on preserving capital in response to the ongoing market volatility. The letter outlined that actions taken by the FHLBB included an excess stock repurchase moratorium, an increased retained earnings target, and suspension of its quarterly dividend payment. As such, there were no dividends received during the year ended December 31, 2009. There can be no assurance that such dividends will be reinstated in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that the impact of recent or future legislation on the Federal Home Loan Banks also will not cause a decrease in the value of the FHLBB stock held by us.
 
Financial Modernization:   The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act permits greater affiliation among banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other companies under a new type of financial services company known as a “financial holding company.” A financial holding company essentially is a bank holding company with significantly expanded powers. Financial holding companies are authorized by statute to engage in a number of financial activities previously impermissible for bank holding companies, including securities underwriting, dealing and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and agency; and merchant banking activities. The act also permits the Federal Reserve Board and the Treasury Department to authorize additional activities for financial holding companies if they are “financial in nature” or “incidental” to financial activities. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized, well managed, and has at least a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating. A financial holding company must provide notice to the Federal Reserve Board within 30 days after commencing activities previously determined by statute or by the Federal Reserve Board and Department of the Treasury to be permissible. Neither Existing Rockville Financial nor New Rockville Financial has submitted notice to the Federal Reserve Board of their intent to be deemed a financial holding company. However, New Rockville Financial is not precluded from submitting a notice in the future should it wish to engage in activities only permitted to financial holding companies.
 
Miscellaneous Regulation
 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:   We are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), which implements a broad range of corporate governance and accounting measures for public companies designed to promote honesty and transparency in corporate America and better protect investors from corporate wrongdoing. In general, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandated important new corporate governance and financial reporting requirements intended to enhance the accuracy and transparency of public companies’ reported financial results. It established new responsibilities for corporate chief executive officers, chief financial officers and audit committees in the financial reporting process, and it created a new regulatory body to oversee auditors of public companies. It backed these requirements with new Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement tools, increased criminal penalties for federal mail, wire and securities fraud, and created new criminal penalties for document and record destruction in connection with federal investigations. It also increased the opportunity for more private litigation by lengthening the statute of limitations for securities fraud claims and providing new federal corporate whistleblower protection.
 
Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and executive officers of issuers (as defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act). The prohibition, however, does not apply to mortgages advanced by an insured depository institution, such as those that are subject to the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act.
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also required that the various securities exchanges, including The NASDAQ Global Select Market, prohibit the listing of the stock of an issuer unless that issuer complies with various requirements relating to their committees and the independence of their directors that serve on those committees.


104


Table of Contents

Community Reinvestment Act:   Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as amended as implemented by FDIC regulations, a bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA does require the FDIC, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such institution, including applications to acquire branches and other financial institutions. The CRA requires the FDIC to provide a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. Rockville Bank’s latest FDIC CRA rating was “outstanding.”
 
Connecticut has its own statutory counterpart to the CRA which is also applicable to Rockville Bank. The Connecticut version is generally similar to the CRA but utilizes a five-tiered descriptive rating system. Connecticut law requires the Connecticut Banking Commissioner to consider, but not be limited to, a bank’s record of performance under Connecticut law in considering any application by the bank to establish a branch or other deposit-taking facility, to relocate an office or to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of any other banking institution. Rockville Bank’s most recent rating under Connecticut law was “outstanding.”
 
Consumer Protection and Fair Lending Regulations:   We are is subject to a variety of federal and Connecticut statutes and regulations that are intended to protect consumers and prohibit discrimination in the granting of credit. These statutes and regulations provide for a range of sanctions for non-compliance with their terms, including imposition of administrative fines and remedial orders, and referral to the Attorney General for prosecution of a civil action for actual and punitive damages and injunctive relief. Certain of these statutes authorize private individual and class action lawsuits and the award of actual, statutory and punitive damages and attorneys’ fees for certain types of violations.
 
The USA Patriot Act:   On October 26, 2001, the USA Patriot Act (the “Patriot Act”) was enacted. The Patriot Act gives the federal government new powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. The Patriot Act also requires the federal banking regulators to take into consideration the effectiveness of controls designed to combat money-laundering activities in determining whether to approve a merger or other acquisition application of an FDIC-insured institution. As such, if New Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank were to engage in a merger or other acquisition, the effectiveness of its anti-money-laundering controls would be considered as part of the application process. We have established policies, procedures and systems to comply with the applicable requirements of the law. The Patriot Act was reauthorized and modified with the enactment of the USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005.
 
Federal Securities Laws:   Our common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


105


Table of Contents

 
FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION
 
Federal Taxation
 
General:   We are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. Our tax returns have not been audited during the past five years. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us.
 
Method of Accounting:   For Federal income tax purposes, we report income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31 for filing federal income tax returns.
 
Bad Debt Reserves:   Prior to the Small Business Protection Act of 1996 (the “1996 Act”), Existing Rockville Financial’s subsidiary, Rockville Bank, was permitted to establish a reserve for bad debts and to make annual additions to the reserve. These additions could, within specified formula limits, be deducted in arriving at our taxable income. As a result of the 1996 Act, Rockville Bank was required to use the specific charge-off method in computing its bad debt deduction beginning with its 1996 federal tax return. Savings institutions were required to recapture any excess reserves over those established as of December 31, 1987 (base year reserve). At December 31, 2009, the subsidiary had no reserves subject to recapture in excess of its base year.
 
Taxable Distributions and Recapture:   Prior to the 1996 Act, bad debt reserves created before January 1, 1988 were subject to recapture into taxable income if Rockville Bank failed to meet certain thrift asset and definitional tests. Federal legislation has eliminated these thrift-related recapture rules. At December 31, 2009, our total federal pre-1988 base year reserve was $1.2 million. However, under current law, pre-1988 base year reserves remain subject to recapture if Rockville Bank makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its stock, pays dividends in excess of tax earnings and profits, or ceases to maintain a bank charter.
 
Alternative Minimum Tax:   The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), imposes an alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) at a rate of 20.0% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences which we refer to as “alternative minimum taxable income.” The AMT is payable to the extent such alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount and the AMT exceeds the regular income tax. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90.0% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain AMT payments may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. We have not been subject to the AMT and have no such amounts available as credits for carryover.
 
Net Operating Loss Carryovers:   A corporation may carry back net operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years. At December 31, 2009, Existing Rockville Financial had no net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes.
 
Corporate Dividends-Received Deduction:   New Rockville Financial may exclude from its income 100.0% of dividends received from Rockville Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations. The corporate dividends received deduction is 80.0% in the case of dividends received from corporations with which a corporate recipient does not file a consolidated tax return, and corporations which own less than 20.0% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend may deduct only 70.0% of dividends received or accrued on their behalf.
 
Connecticut State Taxation
 
We are subject to the Connecticut corporation business tax. The Connecticut corporation business tax is based on the federal taxable income before net operating loss and special deductions and makes certain modifications to federal taxable income to arrive at Connecticut taxable income. Connecticut taxable income is multiplied by the state tax rate (7.5% for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and 7.5% for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010) to arrive at Connecticut income tax.
 
In 1998, the State of Connecticut enacted legislation permitting the formation of passive investment companies by financial institutions. This legislation exempts qualifying passive investment companies from the


106


Table of Contents

Connecticut corporation business tax and excludes dividends paid from a passive investment company from the taxable income of the parent financial institution. Rockville Bank established a passive investment company, SBR Mortgage Company, in December 1998 and eliminated the state income tax expense of Rockville Bank effective December 31, 1998 through December 31, 2009.
 
We believe we are in compliance with the state passive investment company requirements and that no state taxes are due from December 31, 1998 through December 31, 2009; however, we have not been audited by the Department of Revenue Services for such periods. If the state were to determine that the passive investment company was not in compliance with statutory requirements, a material amount of taxes could be due. The State of Connecticut continues to be under pressure to find new sources of revenue, and therefore could enact legislation to eliminate the passive investment company exemption. If such legislation were enacted, we would be subject to additional state income taxes in Connecticut.
 
Rockville Bank, Rockville Financial MHC and Existing Rockville Financial are not currently under audit with respect to their income tax returns, and their state tax returns have not been audited for the past five years.


107


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT
 
Shared Management Structure
 
The Board of Directors of New Rockville Financial is comprised of 13 persons who are generally elected for terms of four years, approximately one-fourth of whom are elected annually. The current directors of New Rockville Financial are the same individuals who serve as directors of Rockville Bank, Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC In addition, certain executive officers of New Rockville Financial are also executive officers of Rockville Bank and Existing Rockville Financial. Both New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank may choose to appoint additional or different persons as directors and executive officers in the future; however, we expect that New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank will continue to have some common executive officers until there is a business reason to establish a separate management structure. To date, executive officers have only been compensated for their services to Rockville Bank and Existing Rockville Financial. Our directors will receive compensation for their services to New Rockville Financial in lieu of compensation for their services to Existing Rockville Financial.
 
Executive Officers
 
Our executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and hold office until their respective successors have been duly elected or until death, resignation, retirement or removal by the Board of Directors or shareholders.
 
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of the individuals currently employed as executive officers of Existing Rockville Financial. These individuals will continue in the same positions at New Rockville Financial following the conversion and the offering.
 
             
Name(1)
 
Age(2)
 
Position
 
William J. McGurk
    68     President and Chief Executive Officer
Christopher E. Buchholz
    56     Executive Vice President
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    56     Executive Vice President
John T. Lund
    40     Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Judy L. Keppner Clark
    51     Secretary
 
 
(1) Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. served as Executive Vice President of Existing Rockville Financial until his planned retirement, effective as of June 30, 2010.
 
(2) Ages presented are as of June 30, 2010.
 
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of the individuals currently employed as executive officers of Rockville Bank.
 
             
Name(1)
 
Age(2)
 
Position
 
William J. McGurk
    68     President and Chief Executive Officer
Christopher E. Buchholz
    56     Executive Vice President
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    56     Executive Vice President
John T. Lund
    40     Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Richard C. DiChiara
    59     Senior Vice President, Retail Banking Officer
Mark A. Kucia
    46     Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking Officer
Laurie A. Rosner
    46     Senior Vice President, Marketing and Administrative Services Officer
Darlene S. White
    52     Senior Vice President, Operations Officer
 
 
(1) Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. served as Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of Rockville Bank until his planned retirement, effective as of June 30, 2010.
 
(2) Ages presented are as of June 30, 2010.


108


Table of Contents

 
Retirement of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
 
In June 2009, we announced that William J. McGurk, our longstanding President and Chief Executive Officer, will retire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in April 2011. Mr. McGurk will remain on our Board of Directors until his term expires in 2013. Our Board of Directors and Mr. McGurk have had preliminary discussions regarding a possible continuing consulting role after his retirement. In addition, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. retired on June 30, 2010. Mr. Jeamel remains on the Board of Directors until 2011 when his current term expires. The Board intends to nominate him for an additional two-year term until 2013 to facilitate the transition of management and to amend our bylaws and the Board of Directors’ policy on mandatory retirement to allow him to serve the two additional years. Mr. Jeamel currently consults for Rockville Bank as well. His former Chief Operating Officer responsibilities were assumed by Executive Vice Presidents, Christopher E. Buchholz and Richard J. Trachimowicz. We are currently engaged in a search for Mr. McGurk’s successor and expect to identify Mr. McGurk’s replacement in January 2011. A new Chief Operating Officer may be named after consultation with the new Chief Executive Officer. For more information about our leadership please see “BUSINESS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND ROCKVILLE BANK — Our Leadership”.
 
Biographical Information of Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors
 
The business experience of each of our executive officers who are not directors for at least the past five years is set forth below.
 
Christopher E. Buchholz , Executive Vice President, joined Rockville Bank in June 2006 and served as the Commercial Banking Market Executive until he was appointed to the position of Senior Vice President, Senior Commercial Banking Officer in late 2006. He was promoted to his current position in July 2007. Prior to joining Rockville Bank, Mr. Buchholz served as Senior Vice President, Market Manager, Business Banking at Bank of America.
 
Richard J. Trachimowicz , Executive Vice President, joined Rockville Bank in May 1996 and served as the Senior Vice President, Retail Banking Officer until he was appointed to the position of Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Organizational Development in 2007. In April 2010, he was promoted to his current position. Prior to 1996, Mr. Trachimowicz served as Manager of Sales and Customer Service for Northeast Savings, located in Hartford, Connecticut.
 
John T. Lund , Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, joined Rockville Bank in December 2008. Prior to joining Rockville Bank, Mr. Lund served as a Bank Examiner with the FDIC, out of the Hartford, Connecticut office since 1993.
 
Richard C. DiChiara , Senior Vice President, Retail Banking Officer, joined Rockville Bank in November 2007. Prior to joining Rockville Bank, Mr. DiChiara served as Senior Vice President, Business Banking at Bank of America. Prior to his transition to Bank of America in 2005, Mr. DiChiara served as Senior Vice President, Business and Professional Services at Webster Bank.
 
Mark A. Kucia , Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking Officer, joined Rockville Bank in October 2005 and served as the Vice President, Senior Commercial Real Estate Lender until he was promoted to his current position in August 2007. Prior to joining Rockville Bank, Mr. Kucia served as Vice President, Senior Commercial Real Estate Lender at Liberty Bank located in Middletown, Connecticut.
 
Laurie A. Rosner , Senior Vice President, Marketing and Administrative Services Officer, joined Rockville Bank in July 1991. She has served in various positions at Rockville Bank, including Assistant Corporate Secretary.
 
Darlene S. White , Senior Vice President, Operations Officer, joined Rockville Bank in April 2006. Prior to joining Rockville Bank, Ms. White served as Chief Operating Officer at the Polish National Credit Union, located in Chicopee, Massachusetts.


109


Table of Contents

Our Directors
 
New Rockville Financial has 13 directors. Directors serve four-year staggered terms so that approximately one-fourth of the directors are elected at each annual meeting. Directors of Rockville Bank will be elected by New Rockville Financial as its sole shareholder. The following table states our directors’ names, their ages, the years when they began serving as directors of Rockville Bank and when their current term expires.
 
                             
    Positions Held with
      Director
  Current Term
Name(1)
 
New Rockville Financial
 
Age(2)
 
Since
 
Expires
 
C. Perry Chilberg
        62       1999       2011  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. 
        70       2007       2011  
Kristen A. Johnson
        44       2010       2011  
Rosemarie Novello Papa
        66       2007       2011  
Michael A. Bars
  Vice Chairman     54       2003       2012  
Pamela J. Guenard
        47       2007       2012  
Thomas S. Mason
        70       1989       2012  
Peter F. Olson
        70       1980       2012  
Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr. 
  Chairman     61       2003       2013  
Stuart E. Magdefrau
        55       1995       2013  
William J. McGurk
  President/Chief Executive Officer     68       1981       2013  
David A. Engelson
        66       1998       2014  
Richard M. Tkacz
        57       2007       2014  
 
 
(1) The mailing address for each person listed is 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074. Each of the persons listed as a director is also a director of Rockville Bank, Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC
 
(2) Ages as of June 30, 2010.
 
Biographical Information of our Directors
 
The business experience of each of our directors for at least the past five years is set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated, each director has held his or her current position for the past five years.
 
C. Perry Chilberg  — Mr. Chilberg is the Vice President and majority owner of Bergson Tire, Co., Inc., an automotive tire retail business and a manufacturer of truck tire retreads, located in Ellington, Connecticut.
 
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.  — Mr. Jeamel joined Rockville Bank in 1990. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rockville Bank until 2003 when he was promoted to Executive Vice President. In 2005, he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer of Rockville Bank and was appointed Executive Vice President of Existing Rockville Financial. Mr. Jeamel retired from his positions with Rockville Bank and Existing Rockville Financial on June 30, 2010, but still consults for Rockville Bank.
 
Kristen A. Johnson  — Ms. Johnson has worked for the Connecticut Water Company in Clinton, Connecticut since May 2007, and was promoted to Vice President of Human Resources in December 2007. Prior to joining Connecticut Water Company, she served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Organizational Development Officer, at Rockville Bank. Since joining Rockville Bank in December 1996, she also had served as Human Resources and Administrative Services Officer.
 
Rosemarie Novello Papa  — Ms. Papa is Past Chair of the Board of Trustees for Eastern Connecticut Health Network and a member of the Board of Trustees for Manchester Community College Foundation.
 
Michael A. Bars  — Mr. Bars is a partner with the law firm of Kahan, Kerensky & Capossela, LLP, a general practice law firm located in Vernon, Connecticut.


110


Table of Contents

Pamela J. Guenard  — Since 2004, Ms. Guenard has been a Vice President at Don Brooks & Associates, Inc, a firm specializing in income tax preparation, bookkeeping and payroll services, located in South Windsor, Connecticut. Ms. Guenard is also an owner of Dovetail Woodworks, Inc., a privately held manufacturer of cedar outdoor furniture, located in Ellington, Connecticut.
 
Thomas S. Mason  — Mr. Mason was, for over 30 years, the owner, President and Treasurer of L. Bissell and Son, Inc., an insurance agency located in Rockville, Connecticut, until he retired in 1995.
 
Peter F. Olson  — Mr. Olson is the owner of Ladd & Hall Co., Inc., a privately held retail furniture company located in Rockville, Connecticut.
 
Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr.  — Mr. Lefurge is a certified public accountant. He is the majority shareholder of the auditing, tax and accounting services firm of Lefurge & Gilbert, PC, CPAs, located in Vernon, Connecticut, where he also holds the position of President.
 
Stuart E. Magdefrau  — Mr. Magdefrau is a certified public accountant, practicing with the firm of Magdefrau, Renner & Ciaffaglione LLC, CPAs, located in Vernon, Connecticut. He was the founding partner of the firm but no longer has an ownership interest in it.
 
William J. McGurk  — Mr. McGurk joined Rockville Bank in 1980, as President and Chief Executive Officer. In 1981, Mr. McGurk was elected to the Board of Directors. He has over 29 years of commercial and thrift banking experience with Rockville Bank and 44 years of banking experience. He has extensive experience in the areas of retail and business lending, retail banking, asset management and marketing.
 
David A. Engelson  — Mr. Engelson was, for 19 years, the Supervisory Principal of Center Road Elementary School located in Vernon, Connecticut, until he retired in 2002. He is currently the Executive Director of Hockanum Valley Community Council, Inc., a social service agency, located in Vernon, Connecticut.
 
Richard M. Tkacz  — Mr. Tkacz is the owner of Rich’s Oil Service, Inc. and Rich’s Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc., privately held oil distributing and HVAC companies located in Enfield, Connecticut.
 
Board Independence
 
It is the policy of the Board of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial that a majority of the directors be independent within the meaning of applicable laws and regulations and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
 
Since Existing Rockville Financial’s formation in 2004 and for many years prior thereto as a mutual savings bank, the Board of Directors has been chaired by an independent member of the Board of Directors. This leadership structure reflects the Board of Directors’ philosophy that its responsibility to oversee the organization is most appropriately served by having a Board Chairman who is independent. The Chairman of the Board of Directors works with the President and Chief Executive Officer on Board procedures so as to maintain objectivity while at the same time taking advantage of the banking experience and insight of management in order to make effective use of the Board of Directors for the organization’s benefit. New Rockville Financial’s bylaws prohibit the offices of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman to be held by the same individual.
 
The Board of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial has affirmatively determined that all directors are independent, with the exception of William J. McGurk, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr., former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. The Board of Directors has also affirmatively determined in accordance with the Audit Committee’s independence determination policy that the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors within the meaning of applicable laws and regulations, the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the corporate guidelines as set forth in the Audit Committee Charter. In addition, Existing Rockville Financial’s Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the Board of Directors’ Human Resources Committee is comprised


111


Table of Contents

entirely of independent directors within the meaning of applicable laws and regulations, and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
 
Independence Standards
 
As described above, Existing Rockville Financial’s Board of Directors examines the independence of its members annually. In order for a director to be considered independent, the Board of Directors must determine that the director has no material relationship with Existing Rockville Financial, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has such a material relationship. At a minimum, a director will not be considered independent if, among other things, the director:
 
1. has been employed by Rockville Bank or its affiliates in the current year or past three years.
 
2. accepts directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from Rockville Bank or any affiliate thereof, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors, or any other committee and other than fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with Rockville Bank, provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service.
 
3. has accepted, or has an immediate family member who has accepted, any payments from Rockville Bank or its affiliates in excess of $120,000 during the current or any of the three previous fiscal years (except for board services, retirement plan benefits, non-discretionary compensation or loans made by Rockville Bank in accordance with applicable banking regulations).
 
4. has an immediate family member who is, or has been in the past three years, employed by Rockville Bank or its affiliates as an executive officer.
 
5. has been or has an immediate family member who has been a partner, controlling shareholder or an executive officer of any “for profit” business to which Rockville Bank or its affiliates made or from which it or its affiliates received, payments (other than those which arise solely from investments in the our securities) that exceed five percent of the entity’s or Rockville Bank’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, during any of the past three years.
 
6. has been or has an immediate family member who has been employed as an executive of another entity where any of Rockville Bank’s executives served on that entity’s compensation committee during any of the past three years.
 
7. has been or has an immediate family member who has been a current partner of Rockville Bank’s outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of Rockville Bank’s outside auditor, who worked on Rockville Bank’s audit at any time during any of the past three years.
 
Board Meetings and Committees
 
The business of our Boards of Directors is conducted through monthly meetings and activities of the Boards and their committees. The Board of Directors of Rockville Bank consists of those persons who serve as directors of Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial. Additionally, members of Existing Rockville Financial’s and Rockville Bank’s committees serve on the identical committees of Rockville Bank. During 2009, the Board of Directors held twelve regular meetings. No current director attended fewer than 75.0% of the aggregate of Rockville Bank’s and Existing Rockville Financial’s Board and committee meetings in 2009, of which he or she was a member, during the period he or she was a director and a committee member, with the exception of Mr. McGurk who attended 73.0% of the aggregate of Rockville Bank’s and Existing Rockville Financial’s Board and committee meetings in 2009.
 
Mr. McGurk was excused from certain Board meetings in 2009 pursuant to a succession planning exercise that was approved in advance by the Board of Directors. In connection with his announced intention to retire, several Board meetings in 2009 were conducted by a Rockville Bank senior officer selected in advance and briefed to serve in the Chief Executive Officer’s stead at the meeting. This program was to give internal potential successors to the position an opportunity to conduct Board meetings and lead discussions. The Chief


112


Table of Contents

Executive Officer was fully aware of all agenda items for each missed meeting and individually briefed each presenter in preparation for the meeting. This program was completed and the Chief Executive Officer intends to be physically present at all future Board meetings. The standing committees of the Board are discussed below.
 
Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders
 
It is our policy to encourage the attendance of each member of the Board of Directors at New Rockville Financial’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We expect all of our directors to attend the Annual Meetings. All of the directors attended the 2009 and 2010 Annual Meetings.
 
Committees of the Board of Directors
 
The Board of Directors has five committees: the Audit Committee (as described below), the Human Resources Committee (as described below), the Asset/Liability Committee, the Executive Committee and the Lending Committee. We also have a Nominating Committee, whose members include both members of our Board of Directors and individuals who are not directors, and a Succession Committee, whose members include six independent directors. See below “The Nominating Committee and Selection of Nominees for the Board”. Each of the above committees is a joint committee of Rockville Bank and Existing Rockville Financial. The Board of Directors may, by resolution, designate one or more additional committees.
 
The Audit Committee , consisting of directors Thomas S. Mason, Chairman, Stuart E. Magdefrau, Vice Chairman, David A. Engelson, and Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr., meets periodically with our independent registered public accounting firm and management to review accounting, auditing, internal audit, compliance and financial reporting matters. This committee met six times during the year ended December 31, 2009. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent in accordance with our Audit Committee’s independence determination policy, the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s audit committee independence standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lefurge and Mr. Magdefrau are audit committee financial experts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. All of the members of the Audit Committee have a basic understanding of finance and accounting and are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements.
 
The Human Resources Committee currently consists of directors David A. Engelson, Chairman, C. Perry Chilberg, Vice Chairman, Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr. and Rosemarie Novello Papa. This committee met five times during the year ended December 31, 2009. Each member of the Human Resources Committee is independent in accordance with the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. There were no Human Resources Committee “interlocks” during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, which generally means that no executive officer served as a member of the compensation committee or Board of Directors of another non-tax-exempt company, an executive officer of which serves on our Human Resources Committee. The Human Resources Committee acts under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.
 
The Nominating Committee and Selection of Nominees for the Board
 
We have adopted a director nominations policy, which sets forth the procedure for selecting (i) director nominees for election and/or re-election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting of shareholders, (ii) candidates to fill vacancies on the Board in between annual meetings of shareholders, and (iii) members for membership on Board committees. The director nomination policy includes a three-tier selection process, beginning with an advisory Nominating Committee, which does not have a formal charter.
 
The Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying and recruiting director candidates. The current members of the Nominating Committee are Michael A. Bars, C. Perry Chilberg, Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr., Peter F. Olson, William J. McGurk, members of Existing Rockville Financial’s Executive Committee, and David W. Miner, corporator of Rockville Financial MHC Director candidates are recommended based upon their character and track record of accomplishments in leadership roles as well as their professional and corporate


113


Table of Contents

experience, skills and expertise; and more specifically based upon their observance of the highest standards of business and personal ethics and integrity, their active support of community activities in our market area, and their willingness to participate in appropriate business development efforts and Bank outreach events. The Nominating Committee seeks to align Board composition with Rockville Bank’s strategic direction so that the Board of Directors’ members bring skills, experience and background that are relevant to the key strategic and operational issues that they will review, oversee and approve. Because being the best community bank in the market is a cornerstone of Rockville Bank’s strategic direction, community outreach and community leadership are important considerations in reviewing and selecting director candidates. Because we are a financial institution, familiarity with financial matters is another such important consideration. The Nominating Committee and the other members of the Board of Directors view the Board of Directors as a deliberative body and seek members who are willing to learn from each other and deliberate issues as they arise.
 
We do not have a diversity policy relating to Board of Directors membership, nor have we articulated a specific definition of diversity in this context.
 
The Nominating Committee makes its recommendations to the independent members of the Board of Directors. The independent members of the Board of Directors, by majority vote, recommend director nominees to the full Board for election and/or re-election to the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders and, if necessary, candidates to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors in between annual meetings of the shareholders. In making such recommendations, the independent directors consider the recommendations of the Nominating Committee, but may recommend director nominees not recommended or considered by the Nominating Committee.
 
The Board of Directors then recommends to the shareholders the director nominees for election and/or re-election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting of shareholders only from the candidates recommended by the independent directors and in accordance with the foregoing procedure.
 
The Nominating Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the re-nomination of each of the current directors based on the director’s performance and the applicability and relevance of his or her background, skills and experience to our corporate strategy at that time.
 
The members of the Board of Directors are currently serving terms that expire in 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014. In reviewing the candidates for nomination or re-nomination each year, the Nominating Committee and Board of Directors consider the mix of talents and experience of the entire Board of Directors. Among other things, the Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors consider the following qualities or experience of the members whose terms expire in 2011, 2012, 2013 or 2014 to be significant:
 
Mr. Chilberg is an entrepreneur who owns a business with both a consumer retail function and a manufacturing component. His business experience as an entrepreneur in the community is valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Jeamel has been both a senior officer of Existing Rockville Financial since its formation in 2004 and Rockville Bank since 1990, and has had both operational and financial responsibilities at both institutions. Up until his retirement on June 30, 2010 he was one of two management directors on the Board. He is also active on the Board of Directors of a significant social services agency in the community. His banking and related business and leadership experience, as well as his community service experience, are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Ms. Papa has served as the Chairman and continues to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the primary voluntary healthcare institution in the community. She also serves on the Board of Directors of the local community college. Her leadership and community service experience are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Bars is a partner with one of the largest law firms headquartered in the community and serves on the boards of directors of numerous community organizations. His legal and community service experience are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.


114


Table of Contents

Mr. Mason was for over 30 years prior to his retirement the president and treasurer of a prominent insurance agency in the community. His long term experience as an entrepreneur in both the business and retail residential markets in the community are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Olson is the owner of a retail furniture business in the community. His long term experience as an entrepreneur in the retail business community is valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Lefurge is a certified public accountant and the president of an accounting firm located in the community. He also is a financial expert. His financial and leadership experience are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Magdefrau is also a certified public accountant practicing with an accounting firm that he founded located in the community. He also is a financial expert. His financial and leadership experience are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. McGurk has been Existing Rockville Financial’s President and CEO since its formation in 2004 and the President and CEO of Rockville Bank since 1980. He is the only remaining management director on the Board. He is active in numerous community non-profits. In addition to his intimate knowledge of our operations, his 45 years of banking experience and leadership qualities are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Engelson is the executive director of one of the community’s most active and visible social service agencies and is a prior elementary school principal in the community. His long time significant leadership and involvement in community service are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Ms. Guenard is an entrepreneur who built her own company in the community and then became a senior officer of a business with significant visibility in the business community. Her experience as an entrepreneur and participation in the business community are valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Mr. Tkacz is an entrepreneur who owns two community businesses with a significant presence in the construction and residential homeowner markets. His experience as an entrepreneur and participation in the business community are also valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.
 
Ms. Johnson has been a human resources executive both with Rockville Bank and now with a regulated public service company. Her human resources experience is valuable to the Board’s overall capabilities.


115


Table of Contents

 
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the compensation of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and three most highly compensated executive officers during 2009. Each individual listed in the table below may be referred to as a Named Executive Officer or Executive Officer. The material terms of each officer’s employment agreements are described below. No options or other equity-based awards were repriced or otherwise modified during 2009 for the Named Executive Officers. A portion of 2009 compensation as reflected in the following table is represented by the value attributable to restricted stock and stock options granted in the first quarter.
 
                                                                         
                            Change in
       
                            Pension
       
                            Value and
       
                            Nonqualified
       
                        Non-Equity
  Deferred
       
                Stock
  Option
  Incentive Plan
  Compensation
  All Other
   
Name and Principal Position
  Year   Salary(4)   Bonus   Awards(5)   Awards(6)   Compensation(7)   Earnings(8)   Compensation(9)   Total
(a)   (b)   ( c)$   (d)$   (e)$   (f)$   (g)$   (h)$   (i)$   (j)$
 
William J. McGurk
    2009       432,772       0       32,109       94,855       247,600       505,387       74,546       1,387,269  
President and Chief
    2008       426,954       0       503,160       81,600       124,638       579,973       101,199       1,817,524  
Executive Officer
    2007       403,471       0       0       122,400       242,676       0       77,177       845,724  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.(1)
    2009       238,420       0       25,410       41,785       115,968       129,400       87,071       638,054  
Chief Operating Officer
    2008       234,439       0       323,460       32,640       64,373       192,856       1,589,475       2,437,243  
      2007       219,881       0       0       48,960       99,189       258,106       51,587       677,723  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    2009       197,809       0       23,100       34,313       99,148       173,984       39,091       567,445  
Executive Vice President
    2008       192,662       0       119,800       27,200       44,100       50,042       47,678       481,482  
      2007       168,318       0       0       40,800       59,129       77,466       30,562       376,275  
John T. Lund(2)
    2009       146,531       0       13,860       19,063       58,679       0       18,219       256,352  
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
                                                                       
Richard J. Trachimowicz(3)
    2009       142,302       0       20,790       18,605       57,061       66,554       25,600       330,912  
Executive Vice President
    2008       138,531       8,058       59,900       17,680       30,456       75,797       25,613       356,035  
 
 
(1) Mr. Jeamel retired as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank as of June 30, 2010.
 
(2) Mr. Lund was hired on December 8, 2008 and became a Named Executive Officer in 2009.
 
(3) Mr. Trachimowicz became a Named Executive Officer in 2008. He was promoted to Executive Vice President from Senior Vice President/Human Resources and Organizational Development Officer in 2010.
 
(4) Reflects actual base salary amounts paid for fiscal year 2009. 2009 base salaries are follows: Mr. McGurk: $432,772, Mr. Jeamel: $238,420; Mr. Buchholz: $203,840; Mr. Lund: $150,800; and Mr. Trachimowicz: $146,640.
 
(5) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards made pursuant to Rockville’s 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan determined in accordance with FASB Topic 718. Prior years were restated in order to comply with the new reporting requirement. For the restricted stock awarded in December 2006, 20.0% vested on December 22, 2006, 20.0% vested on each December 13, 2007-2009 and 20.0% will vest on December 13, 2010; for the restricted stock awarded in February 2008, 20.0% vested on February 20, 2008-2010 and 20.0% vest on each February 20, 2011 and 2012; for the restricted stock awarded in March 2009, 20.0% vested on March 16, 2009 and 2010 and 20.0% vest on each March 16, 2011-2013. Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel reached retirement age and unvested shares will be accelerated upon retirement; therefore, the awards were fully expensed at grant. Assumptions made in valuing these awards are disclosed in footnote 14, “Share-Based Compensation” to Rockville’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
(6) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards made pursuant to Rockville’s 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan determined in accordance with FASB Topic 718. The stock


116


Table of Contents

options awarded in December 2006 vested on December 13, 2008. The stock options awarded in August 2007 vested 20.0% on August 14, 2007-2010 and vest 20.0% on August 14, 2011; for the stock options awarded in February 2008, 20.0% vested on February 20, 2008-2010 and 20.0% vest on each February 20, 2011-2012; for the stock options awarded in March 2009, 20.0% vested on each March 16, 2009 and 2010 and 20.0% vest on each March 16, 2011-2013. Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel reached retirement age and unvested shares will be accelerated upon retirement; therefore, the awards were fully expensed at grant. Assumptions made in valuing these awards are disclosed in footnote 14, “Share-Based Compensation” to Rockville’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
(7) Reflects the annual incentives earned for fiscal year 2009 under the Rockville Bank Officer Incentive Compensation (OICP) Plan.
 
(8) Reflects the change in the present value of the life annuity from fiscal year end 2008 to 2009 for both the qualified and non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans (the Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank, SERP, Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, and Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement). Change in Pension Value is as follows:
 
                                         
        Supplemental
      Supplemental
   
        Executive
  Supplemental
  Executive Ret.
   
    Retirement Plan
  Retirement Plan
  Savings &
  Agreement
   
Name
  (Pension)   (SERP)   Retirement Plan   (Flat $ Benefit)   Total
 
William J. McGurk
  $ 133,921     $ 278,428     $ 93,038             $ 505,387  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. 
    119,288       0 (a)         $ 10,112 (b)     129,400  
Christopher E. Buchholz
                      173,984 (c)     173,984  
John T. Lund(d)
                            0  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    66,554                         66,554  
 
 
  (a)  Mr. Jeamel received a lump sum payout of this benefit during 2008. As of December 31, 2009, he is not entitled to any future payments from this plan.
 
  (b)  Mr. Jeamel began receiving benefits from this plan during 2008. The present value increased due to the fact that discount rates have decreased to 5.55% from 6.40%.
 
  (c)  Participant is vested in the benefit under this plan based on a plan change effective April 15, 2009.
 
  (d)  Mr. Lund is not currently eligible to participate in the listed plans.
 
(9) All Other Compensation includes 401(k) matching contributions, allocations to our employee stock ownership plan, Bank owned life insurance premiums, group term life insurance premiums, dividends paid, car allowance and contributions to our Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan.
 
The following table shows individual amounts for 2009 included in the “All Other Compensation” column.
 
                                                                         
        Employee
  Bank
              Supplemental
       
        Stock
  Owned
  Group Term
          Savings and
       
        Ownership
  Life
  Life
  Dividend
  Car
  Retirement
       
Name and Principal Position
  401(k)(1)   Plan(2)   Insurance(3)   Insurance(4)   Paid(5)   Allowance(6)   Plan   Other   Total
 
William J. McGurk
  $ 7,350     $ 16,447     $ 105     $ 6,858     $ 9,237     $ 933     $ 33,616     $ 0     $ 74,546  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.  
    7,350       16,447       105       10,555       6,000       3,923       9,291       33,400 (7)     87,071  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    14,700       16,447       0       1,765       1,920       3,923       166       170 (8)     39,091  
John T. Lund
    7,864       9,958       0       199       180       0       0       18 (9)     18,219  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    5,394       12,069       105       1,032       1,000       6,000       0       0       25,600  
 
 
(1) Our matching contributions to the qualified defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan.
 
(2) Our contributions allocated under the employee stock ownership plan. Vesting is as follows: 100.0% for Mr. McGurk, Mr. Jeamel and Mr. Trachimowicz; 60.0% for Mr. Buchholz; and 0.0% for Mr. Lund.
 
(3) The cost of a $25,000 death benefit through Bank Owned Life Insurance.
 
(4) Group term life insurance premiums for coverage in excess of $50,000.
 
(5) Dividend paid for unvested restricted stock.


117


Table of Contents

 
(6) Mr. McGurk’s car allowance reflects his personal use of a company car. Mr. Jeamel and Mr. Buchholz’s car allowances became effective in September, 2007. Mr. Trachimowicz’s car allowance became effective in November 2008.
 
(7) Includes a life insurance premium gross-up reimbursement ($5,764), a payout from Mr. Jeamel’s SERP ($27,636).
 
(8) Flex credit to offset the cost of health/dental insurance.
 
(9) Volunteer pay.
 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 
The following table presents information on plan-based compensation in 2009 for the Named Executive Officers. The restricted stock and stock option awards were granted in 2009 under our 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan, described below. These restricted stock and stock option awards vest over a five-year period.
 
                                                                 
                    All Other
  All Other
       
                    Stock
  Stock
      Grant
                    Awards:
  Awards:
  Exercise
  Date Fair
        Estimated Possible Payouts
  Number of
  Number of
  or Base
  Value of
        Under Non-Equity
  Shares of
  Securities
  Price of
  Stock and
        Incentive Plan Awards(2)   Stock or
  Under-lying
  Option
  Option
Name
  Grant Date(1)   Threshold   Target   Maximum   Units   Options   Awards(3)   Awards(4)
        ($)   ($)   ($)   (# )   (#)   ($/Sh)   ($/Sh)
 
William J. McGurk
    3/16/09       129,832       259,663       324,579       3,475       31,100       9.24       126,964  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.  
    3/16/09       59,605       119,210       149,013       2,750       13,700       9.24       67,195  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    3/16/09       50,960       101,920       127,400       2,500       11,250       9.24       57,413  
John T. Lund
    3/16/09       30,160       60,320       75,400       1,500       6,250       9.24       32,923  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    3/16/09       29,328       58,656       73,320       2,250       6,100       9.24       39,395  
 
 
(1) This column shows the date of the grant for all awards granted in 2009.
 
(2) For Mr. McGurk, the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan target represents 60.0% of base salary. All other executives Annual Incentive Compensation Plan target as a percentage of base salary is as follows: Mr. Jeamel — 50.0%, Mr. Buchholz — 50.0%, Mr. Lund — 40.0% and Mr. Trachimowicz — 40.0%. Incentive opportunity ranges from 50.0% to 125.0% of the target.
 
(3) Exercise price represents the closing price on the grant date.
 
(4) For stock option awards, it reflects the grant date FASB Topic 718 fair value for awards disclosed in the column (j) the Black-Scholes value is $3.05 per share. Assumptions made in valuing these awards are disclosed in footnote 14, “Share-Based Compensation” to Rockville’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 as contained in Rockville’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, incorporated herein by reference.


118


Table of Contents

 
2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan
 
Our Board of Directors and shareholders approved the Rockville Financial, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan in 2006. Our Board of Directors believes that the ability to grant stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights and/or performance awards is an important component of our overall compensation philosophy. In order to attract, retain and motivate qualified employees and Board members, our Board of Directors believes that we must offer market competitive, long-term compensation opportunities. Our Board of Directors believes that the availability of stock benefits is a key component in this strategy and that this strategy also furthers the objective of aligning the interests of management and our shareholders.
 
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the value of all unexercised options and unvested stock awards previously awarded to each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2009.
 
                                                                         
    Option Awards   Stock Awards
                                    Equity
                                    Incentive
                                Equity
  Plan
                                Incentive
  Awards:
                                Plan
  Market or
                                Awards:
  Payout
            Equity
                  Number of
  Value of
    Number of
  Number of
  Incentive
              Market
  Unearned
  Unearned
    Securities
  Securities
  Plan Awards
          Number of
  Value of
  Shares,
  Shares,
    Underlying
  Underlying
  Number of
          Shares or
  Shares or
  Units or
  Units or
    Unexercised
  Unexercised
  Securities
          Units of
  Units of
  Other
  Other
    Options
  Options(1)
  Underlying
  Option
  Option
  Stock That
  Stock That
  Rights
  Rights That
    Exercisable
  Unexercisable
  Unearned
  Exercise
  Expiration
  Have Not
  Have Not
  That Have
  Have Not
Name
  Options   Options   Options   Price   Date   Vested(2)   Vested(3)   Not Vested   Vested
    (#)   (#)   (#)   ($)       (#)   ($)   (#)   ($)
 
William J. McGurk
    6,220       24,880               9.24       3/16/2019       2,780       29,190              
      12,000       18,000               11.98       2/20/2018       25,200       264,600              
      18,000       12,000               14.35       8/14/2017       0       0              
      30,000       0               17.77       12/13/2016       8,400       88,200              
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
    2,740       10,960               9.24       3/16/2019       2,200       23,100              
      4,800       7,200               11.98       2/20/2018       16,200       170,100              
      7,200       4,800               14.35       8/14/2017       0       0              
      12,000       0               17.77       12/13/2016       5,400       56,700              
Christopher E. Buchholz
    2,250       9,000               9.24       3/16/2019       2,000       21,000              
      4,000       6,000               11.98       2/20/2018       6,000       63,000              
      6,000       4,000               14.35       8/14/2017       0       0              
      6,500       0               17.77       12/13/2016       800       8,400              
John T. Lund
    1,250       5,000               9.24       3/16/2019       1,200       12,600              
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    1,220       4,880               9.24       3/16/2019       1,800       18,900              
      2,600       3,900               11.98       2/20/2018       3,000       31,500              
      3,900       2,600               14.35       8/14/2017       0       0              
      2,000       0               17.77       12/13/2016       200       2,100              
 
 
(1) The options granted at $17.77 vested on December 13, 2008, the options granted at $14.35 vested on each August 14, 2007-2010 and will vest on August 14, 2011, the options granted at $11.98 vested on each February 20, 2008-2010 and will vest on each February 20, 2011 and 2012 and the options granted at $9.24 vested on each March 16, 2009 and 2010 and will vest on each March 16, 2011-2013.
 
(2) Vesting dates for the stock awards are as follows: for the restricted stock awarded in December 2006, 20.0% vested on December 22, 2006, and 20.0% on each December 13, 2007-2009 and 20% will vest on December 13, 2010; for the restricted stock awarded in February 2008, 20.0% vested on February 20, 2008-2010 and 20.0% on each February 20, 2011 and 2012; for the restricted stock awarded in March 2009, 20.0% vested on each March 16, 2009-2010 and 20.0% on each March 16, 2011-2013. Vesting is accelerated upon retirement. Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel reached retirement age; therefore, unvested shares will vest on an accelerated basis upon retirement.
 
(3) Market values are based on the closing market price of Existing Rockville Financial stock of $10.50 on December 31, 2009.


119


Table of Contents

 
The following information sets forth the stock awards vested and stock options exercised by the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
                                 
    Option Awards   Stock Awards
    Number of
      Number of
   
    Shares
  Value
  Shares
  Value
    Acquired on
  Realized Upon
  Acquired on
  Realized on
Name
  Exercise   Exercise ($)   Vesting   Vesting ($)(2)
 
William J. McGurk(1)
    0       0       17,495       169,550  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. (1)
    0       0       11,350       109,950  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    0       0       3,300       31,112  
John T. Lund
    0       0       300       2,772  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    0       0       1,650       15,346  
 
 
(1) Vesting is accelerated upon retirement. Mr. McGurk and Mr. Jeamel reached retirement age; therefore, unvested shares will vest on an accelerated basis upon retirement.
 
(2) Value reflects the vested shares at the vesting price on February 20, 2009 of $9.13, March 16, 2009 of $9.24 and December 14, 2009 of $10.29.
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
 
We have adopted the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) for the purpose of providing designated executives of Rockville Bank with supplemental retirement benefits. Messrs. McGurk and Jeamel have been designated by the Human Resources Committee for participation in the SERP which provides them with a retirement benefit equal to 70.0% of the executive’s average annual earnings over the 12-month period during the last 120 months of employment producing the highest average or, if higher, the executive’s current annual earnings, which include base salary plus annual incentive compensation. The SERP benefit is offset by the executive’s benefits under the tax-qualified Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan. With respect to Mr. Jeamel, his SERP benefit is also offset by his benefits under his Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement and his split dollar insurance policy.
 
Participants in the SERP are entitled to their benefit upon the later of termination of employment or attainment of age 60, subject to the completion of five years of service with Rockville Bank. Benefits under the SERP are payable in monthly installments in the form of a straight life annuity unless the participant has made a lump sum election in accordance with the terms of the SERP. A participant may elect to receive all, none or a specified portion of his or her retirement benefit as a lump sum determined on the basis of the interest rate and mortality assumptions used to calculate benefits under the tax-qualified Retirement Plan. Any such lump sum election must be made prior to the date of the participant’s commencement of participation in the SERP; otherwise, such an election becomes effective only if the participant remains in the employment of Rockville Bank for the full 12 calendar months immediately following the date of the election (except in the case of death or disability) and payment of such lump sum pursuant to such election is not made until the fifth anniversary of the date on which payment would otherwise have been made.
 
In the event that a participant who has made an election dies or becomes disabled during the 12-calendar month period following the election date, the requirement to remain employed during such 12-month period will be deemed to have been satisfied. Benefits under the SERP are not payable if barred by any action of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner or the FDIC. Moreover, benefits are not payable if the participant is in breach of any non-competition or other restrictive covenant agreement in such participant’s employment or change in control agreement or if the participant has been discharged from employment for cause. In the event of a participant’s death, the participant’s spouse will receive a benefit equal to 100.0% of the benefit that would have been provided from the SERP had the participant retired on the date of death and commenced benefits on the later of the date the participant would have attained age 60 or the date of the participant’s death; provided, however, that in calculating the participant’s benefit, the offset attributable to the participant’s tax-qualified Retirement Plan shall be determined on the basis of the 50.0% survivor annuity payable to the spouse under the tax-qualified Retirement Plan.


120


Table of Contents

Upon the death of a participant after benefits commence under the SERP, 100.0% of the benefit that the participant was receiving at the time of death will be continued to his or her spouse; provided, however, that if a participant previously received a lump sum payment of all or a portion of the participant’s retirement benefit, such death benefit to the participant’s surviving spouse shall be proportionately reduced. In the event of the death of a participant who has one or more children who are dependents for federal income tax purposes and whose spouse dies while such child is a dependent, 100.0% of the benefit payable to the participant or the spouse, as the case may be, shall be continued to such dependent(s) for so long as any child remains a dependent. In 2008, the Human Resources Committee amended the SERP to comply with new Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and its regulations.
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement
 
We have established Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements for Mr. Jeamel and Mr. Buchholz to supplement their retirement benefits from other sources. Under the Agreements, Mr. Jeamel is receiving an annual benefit of $27,636 and Mr. Buchholz may receive an annual benefit of $40,000, each for 20 years, payable in 240 monthly installments. Benefits payable under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement will be forfeited in the event Mr. Buchholz is “terminated for cause” before a “change in control.” Mr. Jeamel retired effective June 30, 2010.
 
Pension Benefits
 
The following table provides information regarding the retirement benefits for the Named Executive Officer under our tax-qualified defined benefit and supplemental executive retirement plans, namely the Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement, and Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, described below.
 
                         
    Number of
  Present
  Payments
    Years
  Value of
  During
    Credited
  Accumulated
  Last Fiscal
Name
  Service   Benefit ($)   Year ($)
 
William J. McGurk
                       
Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank
    29.00       1,784,290       0  
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank (70.0% SERP)
    29.83       2,944,961       0  
Supplemental Savings & Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank (Article V — Supplemental Pension Benefit)
    29.00       917,493       0  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
                       
Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank
    19.00       1,253,514       0  
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (Flat $ Benefit)
    18.18 (1)     321,442 (2)     27,636  
Christopher E. Buchholz(3)
                       
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (Flat $ Benefit)
    3.58       301,492       0  
John T. Lund(4)
                       
Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank
    0       0       0  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
                       
Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank
    14.00       381,758       0  
 
 
(1) The Plan began paying out benefits to its incumbent; therefore, it does not credit years of service any more. The years of service shown are from Mr. Jeamel’s hiring date to December 31, 2009.
 
(2) Mr. Jeamel began receiving benefits from the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement during 2008.
 
(3) Mr. Buchholz is vested in the benefit under this plan based on a plan change effective April 15, 2009.
 
(4) Mr. Lund is not eligible for a benefit under this plan.


121


Table of Contents

 
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
 
We maintain one defined contribution plan, the Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, which provides for the deferral of compensation for executives on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
 
We adopted and implemented the Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan in connection with the minority stock issuance in 2005. This plan provides restorative payments to executives designated by the Human Resources Committee who are prevented from receiving the full benefits contemplated by the tax-qualified Retirement Plan, 401(k) Plan and employee stock ownership plan. The Named Executive Officers participate in the plan. The restorative payments under the plan consist of payments in lieu of shares that cannot be allocated to the participant’s account under the employee stock ownership plan, deferrals and payments for employer safe harbor or matching contributions that cannot be made under the 401(k) Plan due to the legal limitations imposed on the 401(k) Plan, and payments for benefits that cannot be paid under the tax-qualified Retirement Plan due to legal limitations imposed on benefits payable from the Retirement Plan.
 
The following table provides information with respect to the Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan.
 
                                         
                    Aggregate
    Executive
  Registrant
  Aggregate
  Aggregate
  Balance at
    Contributions in
  Contributions in
  Earnings in
  Withdrawals/
  December 31,
Name
  2009($)   2009 ($)(1)   2009 ($)(2)   Distributions ($)   2009 ($)
 
William J. McGurk
    43,277       33,616       84,357       0       373,647  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.  
    0       9,291       962       0       49,352  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    0       166       1,029       0       3,960  
John T. Lund
    0       0       0       0       0  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    0       0       0       0       0  
 
 
(1) 2009 deferred compensation match on current year deferrals.
 
(2) 2009 deferred compensation interest accrued on all deferrals.
 
Retiree Medical/Drug, Dental and Life Insurance Plans
 
Rockville Bank established the Retiree Medical/Drug Insurance Plan, the Retiree Dental Insurance Plan and the Retiree Life Insurance Plan to provide retiree welfare benefits to employees hired before March 1, 1993 who had at least five years of service at retirement and are age 62 or older. Participants in the Retiree Medical/Drug Insurance Plan and the Retiree Dental Insurance Plan may have to pay a percentage of the premiums payable under the plans, depending on their accumulated years of service and whether they retire before or after January 1, 1994.
 
Participants hired before March 1, 1993 who had at least five years of service at retirement and are age 62 or older are eligible for life insurance coverage equal to the lesser of their final salary at retirement rounded to the next thousand or $100,000. At age 70, the life insurance coverage in effect as of a participant’s retirement date shall be reduced by 50.0%. Rockville Bank pays 100.0% of all premiums under the Retiree Life Insurance Plan.
 
Employment and Change in Control Agreements
 
In 2006, we amended our existing employment agreement with our President and Chief Executive Officer to provide for a one-year, renewable term. The current term ends on December 31, 2010 and may be extended upon written notice from the Human Resources Committee. Similarly, the employment agreements with our remaining Executive Officers (each, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, an “Executive Officer”), will also end on December 31, 2010 and may be extended on an annual basis upon written notice provided by the Human Resources Committee. All of these contracts reflect a term of one year. The employment agreements generally provide for a base salary and the continuation of certain benefits currently received. The agreements are reviewed annually by the Human Resources Committee.


122


Table of Contents

Under specified circumstances, the employment agreements require certain payments to be made upon the Executive Officer’s termination of employment for reasons including a “change in control” as defined in the agreement. However, the Executive Officer’s employment may be terminated for cause without incurring any continuing obligations. If we choose to terminate these employment agreements for reasons other than cause, or if the Executive Officer resigns under specified circumstances that constitute good reason, a severance benefit is payable in the amount of three times the sum of his or her base salary and his or her potential annual incentive compensation for the year of termination or, if higher, his or her actual annual incentive compensation for the year prior to the year of termination. The severance benefit is payable in monthly installments over the 36 months following termination unless the termination occurs within two years after a change in control, in which case it is payable in an immediate lump sum.
 
In addition, the Executive Officer is entitled to a pro-rata portion of the annual incentive compensation potentially payable to him or her for the year of termination; accelerated vesting of any outstanding stock options, restricted stock or other stock awards; immediate exercisability of any outstanding options; and deemed satisfaction of any performance-based objectives under any stock or other long-term incentive award. If the Executive Officer elects to continue his or her health plan coverage under COBRA, we will pay the Executive Officer on a monthly basis the after-tax cost of such COBRA coverage. If the COBRA continuation period is less than three years, we will make a good faith effort to obtain other comparable insured coverage for the Executive Officer for the balance of such three-year period; otherwise, we will pay the Executive Officer a lump sum amount equal on an after-tax basis to the present value of the cost of the coverage that would have been incurred for the balance of such three-year period if the Executive Officer had participated in our retiree medical plan. In addition, we will pay the Executive Officer a lump sum amount equal on an after-tax basis to the cost of continuing coverage under our group long-term disability and group life insurance policies for such three-year period.
 
In the event that an Executive Officer becomes entitled to benefits in connection with a change in control that are subject to the tax on excess parachute payments under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, we will pay to the Executive Officer a gross-up payment such that the net amount retained by the Executive Officer, after deduction of any such excise tax and related income and excise taxes, will be equal to the total payments he or she would have received absent such excise tax. In the event of a potential change in control, we will fund a rabbi trust to provide for payment of benefits due to the Executive Officers under their employment agreements. In consideration for the compensation and benefits provided under their employment agreements, the Executive Officers are prohibited from competing with us during the term of their employment agreements and for a period of two years following their termination of employment; provided, however, that such prohibition does not apply in the event of the Executive Officer’s termination by us without cause within two years following a change in control or the Executive Officer’s resignation for good reason within two years following a change in control or the Executive Officer’s voluntary resignation without entitlement to severance benefits.
 
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
 
In considering the change in control provisions for the employment agreements, the Human Resources Committee was mindful of our intent to remain independent. Accordingly, the Human Resources Committee believes a change in control situation triggering these provisions, and therefore the payment of the change in control amounts, is unlikely. Conversely, the change in control provisions may also serve as a defensive deterrent to an unwanted change in control overture.
 
The tables below reflect the compensation and benefits due to each of the Named Executive Officers, following or in connection with any termination of employment. The amounts shown assume that each termination of employment was effective as of December 31, 2009, and the fair market value of our common stock was $10.50, the closing price of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. The amounts shown in the table are estimates of the amounts which would be paid upon termination of employment. Actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of the termination of employment.


123


Table of Contents

Payments and Benefits upon any Termination
 
Executive officers are entitled to receive earned and unpaid compensation upon any termination of employment. In addition, all unvested stock awards and all unvested stock options held by the Executive Officers will be forfeited upon termination of employment, except death, disability, retirement and change-in-control.
 
Mr. McGurk has reached the retirement age defined in his employment agreement. Therefore, his termination except “involuntary termination for cause” would be considered “Retirement” per the terms of his employment agreement. Mr. McGurk is entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the pro-rata portion of his annual target incentive compensation potentially payable in cash to him for the year of termination.
 
Voluntary Termination
 
Mr. McGurk has reached the retirement age defined in his employment agreement. Therefore, his voluntary termination would be considered “Retirement” per the terms of his employment agreement and entitled benefits per the terms of “Retirements.” Mr. McGurk is eligible for post retirement health care and post retirement life insurance.
 
An Executive Officer who voluntarily terminates employment is otherwise not entitled to any benefits.
 
Involuntary Termination for Cause
 
An Executive Officer whose employment is terminated for cause is not entitled to any benefits. Mr. McGurk is eligible for post retirement health care and post retirement life insurance.
 
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
 
Upon an involuntary termination other than for cause, or simple expiration of the term of the agreement, the Executive Officer is entitled to:
 
  •  Three times the sum of the Executive Officer’s Base Salary immediately prior to termination plus an amount equal to the greater of the portion of the Executive’s annual target incentive compensation potentially payable in cash to the Executive for the year of termination or the portion of the Executive’s annual incentive compensation that became payable in cash to the Executive for the latest year preceding the year of termination.
 
  •  A lump sum payment equal to the pro-rata portion of the Executive’s annual target incentive compensation potentially payable in cash to the Executive for the year of termination.
 
  •  The continuation of benefits, which includes health care, group term life insurance and long-term disability benefits.
 
  •  Mr. McGurk is eligible for post-retirement health care and post retirement life insurance.
 
Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Termination for Good Reason after Change-in-Control
 
Upon an involuntary termination after Change-in-Control, the Executive Officer is entitled to:
 
  •  Three times the sum of the Executive Officer’s Base Salary immediately prior to termination plus an amount equal to the greater of the portion of the Executive’s annual target incentive compensation potentially payable in cash to the Executive for the year of termination or the portion of the Executive’s annual incentive compensation that became payable in cash to the Executive for the latest year preceding the year of termination.
 
  •  A lump sum payment equal to the pro-rata portion of the Executive’s annual target incentive compensation potentially payable in cash to the Executive for the year of termination.
 
  •  The continuation of benefits, which includes health care, group term life insurance and long-term disability benefits.


124


Table of Contents

 
  •  A lump-sum tax gross-up payment if the executive becomes subject to the 20.0% excise tax on “parachute payments.”
 
  •  Mr. McGurk is eligible for post-retirement health care and post-retirement life insurance.
 
Death
 
The Executive Officer’s survivor is entitled to receive earned and unpaid compensation upon the death of the Executive Officer and all unvested stock awards and all unvested stock options held by the Executive Officer will be accelerated and the beneficiary can exercise the options at any time within five years from the termination. In addition, the health care benefit will be continued up to three years.
 
  •  Mr. McGurk’s survivors are eligible for post-retirement health care.
 
Disability
 
The Executive Officer is entitled to receive earned and unpaid compensation upon the separation from service due to disability of the Executive Officer and all unvested stock awards and all unvested stock options held by the Executive Officer will be accelerated and the Executive Officer can exercise the options at any time within five years from the termination. In addition, the health care benefit will be continued until the Executive Officer is eligible for Medicare.
 
Retirement
 
The Executive Officer is entitled to receive earned and unpaid compensation upon the retirement of the Executive Officer and all unvested stock awards and all unvested stock options held by the Executive Officer will be accelerated and the Executive Officer can exercise the options at any time within five years from the termination. In addition, the health care benefit will be continued until the Executive Officer is eligible for Medicare. Mr. McGurk is eligible for post-retirement health care and post-retirement life insurance.
 
The following table describes the potential payments based upon a hypothetical termination or a change in control on December 31, 2009 for William J. McGurk. Column (d) assumes an involuntary termination of the executive in mid year as opposed to the mere expiration of the term of his one-year employment agreement, for which termination payments would be substantially less:
 
                                                         
                            Involuntary
             
                            or Good
             
                            Reason
             
                Involuntary
          Termination
             
                Not for
          within
             
    Voluntary
    Normal
    Cause
    For Cause
    2 Years of
             
Executive Benefits and
  Termination
    Retirement
    Termination
    Termination
    a CIC
    Death
    Disability
 
Payments Upon Termination (a)
  $(b)     $(c)     $(d)     $(e)     $(f)     $(g)     $(h)  
 
Compensation:
                                                       
Base Salary
    0       0       2,077,305       0       2,077,305       0       0  
Short-Term Incentive
    259,663       259,663       259,663       0       259,663       259,663       259,663  
Stock Option Unvested and Accelerated(1)
    31,349       31,349       31,349       0       31,349       31,349       31,349  
Restricted Stock Unvested and Accelerated
    381,990       381,990       381,990       0       381,990       381,990       381,990  
Benefits and Perquisites:
                                                       
Health and Welfare Benefit Continuation(2)
    218,706       218,706       260,701       218,706       260,701       148,607       250,555  
280G Tax & Gross Up
    0       0       0       0       0       0       0  
                                                         
Total:
    891,708       891,708       3,011,008       218,706       3,011,008       821,609       923,557  
                                                         


125


Table of Contents

 
(1) The stock options granted on December 13, 2006, August 14, 2007 and February 20, 2008 were underwater as of December 31, 2009.
 
(2) Includes post retirement health care, post retirement life insurance, health care continuation for eligible non-spouse dependent only, group term life benefits and long-term disability benefits.
 
The following table describes the potential payments based upon a hypothetical termination or a change in control on December 31, 2009 for Christopher E. Buchholz. Column (d) assumes an involuntary termination of the executive in mid year as opposed to the mere expiration of the term of his one-year employment agreement, for which termination payments would be substantially less:
 
                                                         
                            Involuntary
             
                            or Good
             
                            Reason
             
                Involuntary
          Termination
             
                Not for
          within
             
    Voluntary
    Normal
    Cause
    For Cause
    2 Years of
             
Executive Benefits and
  Termination
    Retirement
    Termination
    Termination
    a CIC
    Death
    Disability
 
Payments Upon Termination (a)
  $(b)     $(c)     $(d)     $(e)     $(f)     $(g)     $(h)  
 
Compensation:
                                                       
Base Salary
    0       0       917,280       0       917,280       0       0  
Short-Term Incentive
    0       0       101,920       0       101,920       0       0  
Stock Option Unvested and Accelerated(1)
    0       0       0       0       11,340       11,340       11,340  
Restricted Stock Unvested and Accelerated
    0       0       0       0       92,400       92,400       92,400  
Benefits and Perquisites:
                                                       
Health and Welfare Benefit Continuation(2)
    0       0       7,951       0       7,951       0       22,528  
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement Acceleration(3)
    0       0       0       0       0       0       0  
280G Tax & Gross Up
    0       0       0       0       385,317       0       0  
                                                         
Total:
    0       0       1,027,151       0       1,516,208       103,740       126,268  
                                                         
 
 
(1) The stock options granted on December 13, 2006, August 14, 2007 and February 20, 2008 were underwater as of December 31, 2009.
 
(2) Includes health care continuation, group term life benefits and long-term disability benefits. The value represents three years continuation of benefits grossed up for tax. For disability, benefit is assumed to continue until the participant is eligible for Medicare.
 
(3) Mr. Buchholz is vested in the benefit under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (Flat $ Benefit) on a plan change effective April 15, 2009. Therefore, there is no additional benefit upon change in control under this plan any longer.


126


Table of Contents

 
The following table describes the potential payments based upon a hypothetical termination or a change in control on December 31, 2009 for John T. Lund. Column (d) assumes an involuntary termination of the executive in mid year as opposed to the mere expiration of the term of his one-year employment agreement, for which termination payments would be substantially less:
 
                                                         
                            Involuntary
             
                            or Good
             
                            Reason
             
                Involuntary
          Termination
             
                Not for
          within
             
    Voluntary
    Normal
    Cause
    For Cause
    2 Years of
             
Executive Benefits and
  Termination
    Retirement
    Termination
    Termination
    a CIC
    Death
    Disability
 
Payments Upon Termination (a)
  $(b)     $(c)     $(d)     $(e)     $(f)     $(g)     $(h)  
 
Compensation:
                                                       
Base Salary
    0       0       633,360       0       633,360       0       0  
Short-Term Incentive
    0       0       60,320       0       60,320       0       0  
Stock Option Unvested and Accelerated(1)
    0       0       0       0       6,300       6,300       6,300  
Restricted Stock Unvested and Accelerated
    0       0       0       0       12,600       12,600       12,600  
Benefits and Perquisites:
                                                       
Health and Welfare Benefit Continuation(2)
    0       0       102,933       0       102,933       97,175       851,353  
280G Tax & Gross Up
    0       0       0       0       325,821       0       0  
                                                         
Total:
    0       0       796,613       0       1,141,334       116,075       870,253  
                                                         
 
 
(1) The stock options granted on December 13, 2006, August 14, 2007 and February 20, 2008 were underwater as of December 31, 2009.
 
(2) Includes health care continuation, group term life benefits and long-term disability benefits. The value represents three years continuation of benefits grossed up for tax. For disability, benefit is assumed to continue until the participant is eligible for Medicare.


127


Table of Contents

 
The following table describes the potential payments based upon a hypothetical termination or a change in control on December 31, 2009 for Richard J. Trachimowicz. Column (d) assumes an involuntary termination of the executive in mid year as opposed to the mere expiration of the term of his one-year employment agreement, for which termination payments would be substantially less:
 
                                                         
                            Involuntary
             
                            or Good
             
                            Reason
             
                Involuntary
          Termination
             
                Not for
          within
             
    Voluntary
    Normal
    Cause
    For Cause
    2 Years of
             
Executive Benefits and
  Termination
    Retirement
    Termination
    Termination
    a CIC
    Death
    Disability
 
Payments Upon Termination (a)
  $(b)     $(c)     $(d)     $(e)     $(f)     $(g)     $(h)  
 
Compensation:
                                                       
Base Salary
    0       0       615,888       0       615,888       0       0  
Short-Term Incentive
    0       0       58,656       0       58,656       0       0  
Stock Option Unvested and Accelerated(1)
    0       0       0       0       6,149       6,149       6,149  
Restricted Stock Unvested and Accelerated
    0       0       0       0       52,500       52,500       52,500  
Benefits and Perquisites:
                                                       
Health and Welfare Benefit Continuation(2)
    0       0       76,087       0       76,087       31,854       254,960  
280G Tax & Gross Up
    0       0       0       0       258,950       0       0  
                                                         
Total:
    0       0       750,631       0       1,068,230       90,503       313,609  
                                                         
 
 
(1) The stock options granted on December 13, 2006, August 14, 2007 and February 20, 2008 were underwater as of December 31, 2009.
 
(2) Includes health care continuation, group term life benefits and long-term disability benefits. The value represents three years continuation of benefits grossed up for tax. For voluntary termination or disability, benefit is assumed to continue until the participant is eligible for Medicare and for his spouse until the expiration of her COBRA continuation period.
 
Director Compensation
 
Director Fees
 
After the Human Resources Committee reviewed the results of the analysis on Board of Directors Compensation completed by Pearl Meyer & Partners, and in recognition of the economic climate, the Human Resources Committee recommended not to increase the Board of Directors’ meeting fees from $900 per meeting. Other Board of Directors’ compensation also remained the same.
 
Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $10,200; $900 for each Board meeting and $850 for each Committee meeting that he or she attends. In addition to the above fees, the Chairman of the Board also receives an annual retainer of $21,000, and the Vice Chairman of the Board, the Audit Committee Chairman, and the Human Resources Committee Chairman receive annual retainers of $11,400. Rockville Bank paid fees totaling $375,725 to non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Directors are not paid separately for their services on the Board of both Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank.
 
On March 16, 2009, each non-employee director received 3,500 stock options. The exercise price of these options is $9.24, the grant date closing price. The grant date fair value for each stock option award is $10,675. These options vested 20.0% on March 16, 2009 and March 16, 2010 and the remaining 60.0% will vest 20.0% annually on each anniversary of the grant date over the next three years.


128


Table of Contents

The following table details the compensation paid to each of our non-management directors in 2009.
 
                                                         
                    Change in
       
                    Pension
       
                    Value and
       
    Fees
              Nonqualified
       
    Earned or
          Non-Equity
  Deferred
       
    Paid in
  Stock
      Incentive Plan
  Compensation
  All Other
   
    Cash(1)
  Awards(2)
  Option
  Compensation
  Earnings
  Compensation(4)
  Total
Name
  ($)   ($)   Awards(3)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)
 
Michael A. Bars
    55,725       0       10,675       0       0       800       67,200  
C. Perry Chilberg
    32,800       0       10,675       0       0       800       44,275  
David A. Engelson
    42,975       0       10,675       0       0       998       54,648  
Pamela J.Guenard
    26,675       0       10,675       0       0       0       37,350  
Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr.  
    60,650       0       10,675       0       0       800       72,125  
Stuart E. Magdefrau
    37,525       0       10,675       0       0       800       49,000  
Thomas S. Mason
    40,800       0       10,675       0       0       998       52,473  
Rosemarie Novello Papa
    26,900       0       10,675       0       0       0       37,575  
Peter F. Olson
    40,075       0       10,675       0       0       800       51,550  
Richard M.Tkacz
    32,000       0       10,675       0       0       0       42,675  
 
 
(1) Mr. Mason elected to defer 50.0% of his annual fees, $20,400.
 
(2) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in accordance with FASB Topic 718. Assumptions made in valuing these awards are disclosed in footnote 14, “Share-Based Compensation” to Rockville’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, directors have the following unvested shares; Bars — 2,000 shares; Chilberg — 2,000 shares; Engelson — 2,495 shares; Lefurge — 2,000 shares; Magdefrau — 2,000 shares; Mason — 2,495 shares; and Olson — 2,000 shares.
 
(3) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in accordance with FASB Topic 718. Assumptions made in valuing these awards are disclosed in footnote 14, “Share-Based Compensation” to Rockville’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, directors have the following unvested shares; Bars — 4,900 shares; Chilberg — 4,900 shares; Engelson — 4,900 shares; Guenard — 4,900 shares; Lefurge — 4,900 shares; Magdefrau — 4,900 shares; Mason — 4,900 shares; Papa — 4,900 shares; Olson — 4,900 shares; and Tkacz — 4,900 shares.
 
(4) Reflects dividends paid for unvested restricted stock owned by each director in 2009.
 
Deferred Compensation Plan
 
We maintain the Rockville Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for directors, a non-qualified plan that permits directors to defer all or part of their total fees for a plan year in 25.0% increments. The participants in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan direct the investment of their deferred amounts among several investment funds. Participants elect the method of payment of their deferral accounts either on a date certain or upon termination of their service as a director. Participants may elect to receive the deferral amounts in a lump sum payment or in consecutive annual installments over a period not to exceed five years. We accrued expenses totaling $9,300 in connection with this plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Compensation in the form of perquisites and other personal benefits provided by us has been omitted for all individual directors as the total amount of those perquisites and personal benefits constituted less than $10,000 for 2009 for each.


129


Table of Contents

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
 
Federal law and regulation generally require that all loans or extensions of credit to a director or an executive officer must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with the general public and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. However, regulations also permit a director or an executive officer to receive the same terms through benefit or compensation plans that are widely available to other employees, as long as the director or executive officer is not given preferential treatment compared to the other participating employees.
 
Our directors, executive officers and employees and the directors, executive officers and employees of our subsidiaries are permitted to borrow from Rockville Bank in accordance with the requirements of federal and state law. All loans made by Rockville Bank to directors and executive officers or their related interests have been made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the lender. Residential mortgage loans to three directors reflected interest rate discounts available to all employees of Rockville Bank. We believe that at the time of origination of these loans, none involved more than the normal risk of collectability nor presented any other unfavorable features.
 
Benefits to be Considered Following Completion of the Conversion
 
Stock Benefit Plans.   We may adopt one or more stock benefit plans no earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion. We will submit any such plans to our shareholders for their approval. The terms and conditions of such stock benefit plans, including the number of shares available per award and the types of awards, have not been determined at this time. However, if we implement any stock benefit plans within 12 months following the completion of the conversion, the stock benefit plans will reserve a number of shares up to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering for awards to key employees and directors, at no cost to the recipients. Stock benefit plans implemented within 12 months following the completion of the conversion and offering will also reserve a number of shares up to 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options. The Connecticut Department of Banking regulations impose the above percentage limitations on all stock-benefit plans implemented within 12 months of the conversion and offering. Other limitations imposed by these regulations on plans implemented within 12 months of the completion of the conversion and offering include:
 
(i) Management stock benefit plans, in the aggregate, may not hold more than 3.0% of the shares issued in the offering, provided that if an institution has tangible capital of 10.0% or more following the conversion, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner may permit a management stock benefit plan to hold up to 4.0% of the shares issued in the offering;
 
(ii) Tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans and management stock benefit plans, in the aggregate, may not hold more than 10.0% of the shares issued in the offering, provided that if the institution has tangible capital of 10.0% or more following the conversion, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner may permit the tax-qualified stock benefit plans and management stock benefit plans, in the aggregate, to hold up to 12.0% of the shares issued in the offering;
 
(iii) No individual may receive more than 25.0% of the shares under any stock benefit plan;
 
(iv) Directors who are not employees may not receive more than 5.0% of the shares of any plan individually or 30.0% of the shares of any plan in the aggregate;
 
(v) No stock options may be granted at less than the market price at the time such options are granted;
 
(vi) Shares issued at the time of the conversion may not be used to fund management or employee stock benefit plans;
 
(vii) No plan may begin to vest earlier than one year after the shareholders approve the plan or at a rate exceeding 20.0% per year;


130


Table of Contents

(viii) Accelerated vesting may not be provided for except in the case of disability or death or if there is a change of control; and
 
(ix) Any plan must provide that officers and directors must exercise or forfeit their options in the event that the institution becomes critically undercapitalized under applicable federal law, is subject to an enforcement action by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner or receives a capital directive from the Connecticut Banking Commissioner.
 
We have not yet determined whether we will present any stock benefit plans for shareholder approval within 12 months following the completion of the conversion or more than 12 months after the completion of the conversion. If the stock benefit plans are adopted more than 12 months after the completion of the conversion, the plans may not be subject to all of the limitations described above, and we may elect to implement a stock benefit plan containing features that are different from those described above.
 
In the event either federal or state regulators change their regulations or policies regarding stock benefit plans, including any regulations or policies restricting the size of awards and vesting of benefits as described above, the restrictions described above may not be applicable.
 
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
 
New Rockville Financial’s bylaws provide that New Rockville Financial shall indemnify all officers, directors, employees and agents of New Rockville Financial to the fullest extent permitted under Connecticut and federal law. Such indemnification may include the advancement of funds to pay for or reimburse reasonable expenses incurred by an indemnified party to the fullest extent permitted under Connecticut and federal law. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of New Rockville Financial, pursuant to its bylaws or otherwise, New Rockville Financial has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.


131


Table of Contents

 
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
 
The table below sets forth information as of August 14, 2010, with respect to principal beneficial ownership of common stock by each director and each of the Named Executive Officers, and by any person (including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock and with respect to ownership of common stock by all directors and Named Executive Officers of Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank as a group. The business address of each director and executive officer is 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074.
 
                 
    Number of Shares
   
    Beneficially
  Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Owned(1)   Class(2)
 
Rockville Financial MHC
    10,689,250 (3)     56.69 %
25 Park Street
Rockville, Connecticut 06066
               
Independent Directors:
               
Michael A. Bars
    31,500 (4)     *  
C. Perry Chilberg
    48,800 (5)     *  
David A. Engelson
    49,779 (6)     *  
Pamela J. Guenard
    4,200 (7)     *  
Kristen A. Johnson
    16,734 (8)     *  
Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr. 
    46,300 (9)     *  
Stuart E. Magdefrau
    36,500 (10)     *  
Thomas S. Mason
    29,779 (11)     *  
Rosemarie Novello Papa
    3,708 (12)     *  
Peter F. Olson
    56,000 (13)     *  
Richard M. Tkacz
    6,593 (14)     *  
Named Executive Officers:
               
William J. McGurk
    197,545 (15)(20)     1.05  
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.(21)
    87,585 (16)(20)     *  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    38,406 (17)(20)     *  
John T. Lund
    3,136 (18)(20)     *  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    39,514 (19)(20)     *  
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (20 persons)
    796,313       4.22 %
 
 
Less than 1.0% of the common stock issued and outstanding.
 
(1) Based on information provided by the respective beneficial owners and on filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission made pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
(2) Based on 18,853,112 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of August 14, 2010.
 
(3) Based solely on information provided in a Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Rockville Financial MHC All shares are held with sole voting and dispositive power.
 
(4) Includes 8,000 shares of restricted common stock and 8,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(5) Includes 13,605 shares held by his wife, 5,090 shares held by adult children, 8,000 shares of restricted common stock and 8,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(6) Includes 5,000 shares held by his wife, 10,000 shares held jointly with his wife, 9,979 shares of restricted common stock and 9,800 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(7) Includes 200 shares held jointly with her husband and 3,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.


132


Table of Contents

 
(8) Includes 3,377 shares allocated to the account of the Ms. Johnson under the Rockville Bank employee stock ownership plan, all of which are vested shares.
 
(9) Includes 13,000 shares held jointly with his wife, 7,000 shares held by his wife, 7,800 shares of restricted common stock and 8,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(10) Includes 9,000 shares held jointly with his wife, 7,000 shares of restricted common stock and 8,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(11) Includes 5,000 shares held in the Thomas S. Mason Trust, of which Mr. Mason is the trustee, and 5,000 shares held in the Susan C. Mason Trust, of which Mrs. Mason is the trustee. Also includes 9,979 shares of restricted common stock and 9,800 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(12) Includes 3,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(13) Includes 20,000 shares held by his wife, 7,500 shares of restricted common stock and 8,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(14) Includes 800 shares held by his wife and 3,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(15) Includes 15,000 shares held jointly with his wife, 51,095 shares of restricted common stock and 84,440 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(16) Includes 25,000 shares of restricted common stock and 34,280 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(17) Includes 6,663 shares of restricted common stock and 25,000 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(18) Includes 200 shares held jointly with his wife, 374 shares of restricted common stock and 2,500 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(19) Includes 3,100 shares held jointly with his wife, 3,025 shares of restricted common stock and 13,540 exercisable options to purchase common stock.
 
(20) Includes shares allocated to the account of the individuals under the Rockville Bank employee stock ownership plan. The respective individuals have vested shares as follows: Mr. McGurk — 8,501 shares; Mr. Jeamel — 8,453 shares; Mr. Buchholz — 2,652 shares; Mr. Lund — 0 shares and Mr. Trachimowicz — 6,142 shares.
 
(21) Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. served as Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of Rockville Bank until his planned retirement, effective as of June 30, 2010.


133


Table of Contents

 
SUBSCRIPTIONS BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
The table below sets forth, for each of New Rockville Financial’s directors and executive officers and for all of the directors and executive officers as a group, the following information:
 
(i) the number of exchange shares to be held upon consummation of the conversion, based upon their beneficial ownership of Rockville Financial common stock as of August 14, 2010;
 
(ii) the proposed purchases of subscription shares, assuming sufficient shares of common stock are available to satisfy their subscriptions; and
 
(iii) the total amount of New Rockville Financial common stock to be held upon consummation of the conversion.
 
In each case, it is assumed that subscription shares are sold at the midpoint of the offering range. Connecticut regulations prohibit our directors and officers from selling the shares they purchase in the offering for one year after the date of purchase, except under limited circumstances. See “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”.
 
                                                 
    Number of
          Total Common Stock to be Held
    Exchange
  Proposed Purchases of Stock in the Offering(1)       Percentage of
    Shares to be
  Number of
      Number of
  Shares
Name of Beneficial Owner
  Held(2)   Shares   Amount   Shares   Outstanding(3)
 
Independent Directors:
                                               
Michael A. Bars
    36,039       5,000     $ 50,000               41,039       *  
C. Perry Chilberg
    55,832       1,000       10,000               56,832       *  
David A. Engelson
    56,952       2,000       20,000               58,952       *  
Pamela J. Guenard
    4,805       1,500       15,000               6,305       *  
Kristen A. Johnson
    19,145       10,000       100,000               29,145       *  
Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr. 
    52,971       2,500       25,000               55,471       *  
Stuart E. Magdefrau
    41,759       5,000       50,000               46,759       *  
Thomas S. Mason
    34,070       1,000       10,000               35,070       *  
Rosemarie Novello Papa
    4,242       10,000       100,000               14,242       *  
Peter F. Olson
    64,069       1,000       10,000               65,069       *  
Richard M. Tkacz
    7,543       2,000       20,000               9,543       *  
Named Executive Officers:
                                               
William J. McGurk
    226,011       6,000     $ 60,000               232,011       1.04 %
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.(4)
    100,205       5,000       50,000               105,205       *  
Christopher E. Buchholz
    43,940       3,000       30,000               46,940       *  
John T. Lund
    3,587       1,000       10,000               4,587       *  
Richard J. Trachimowicz
    45,207       1,000       10,000               46,207       *  
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (20 Persons)
    911,061       63,000     $ 630,000               974,061       4.36 %
 
 
 * Less than 1.0% of the common stock issued and outstanding.
 
(1) Includes proposed subscriptions, if any, by associates.
 
(2) Based on information presented in “BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS” assuming an exchange ratio of 1.1441 at the midpoint of the offering range. The valuation and ownership ratios reflect the dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets upon completion of the conversion and offering.
 
(3) Based upon 22,340,608 total shares outstanding at the midpoint of the offering range.
 
(4) Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. served as Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of Rockville Bank until his planned retirement, effective as of June 30, 2010.


134


Table of Contents

 
THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING
 
The Boards of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial, Rockville Financial MHC and Rockville Bank have approved the plan of conversion and the cash contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. The plan of conversion must also be approved by at least (i) 75% of the members of the Board of Directors of the New Holding Company; (ii) 80.0% of the total voting power of the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC; (iii) a majority of the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC who are not employees, officers, directors, trustees or significant borrowers of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank; (iv) a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast by the shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial (including Rockville Financial MHC); and (v) a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial (not including Rockville Financial MHC). The cash contribution is required to be approved by the corporators as well. The conversion must be approved by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner and the Federal Reserve Board and reviewed without objection by the FDIC.
 
General
 
The respective Boards of Directors of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank adopted the plan of conversion on September 16, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of our plan of conversion, Rockville Financial MHC will convert from a partially public mutual holding company structure to a fully public stock holding company structure. Rockville Financial MHC, the mutual holding company parent of Existing Rockville Financial, will merge with and into Existing Rockville Financial, and immediately thereafter, Existing Rockville Financial will merge with and into New Rockville Financial, a newly formed subsidiary of Existing Rockville Financial. After the conversion, Rockville Financial MHC and Existing Rockville Financial will cease to exist. As part of the conversion, New Rockville Financial is offering for sale its ownership interest in Existing Rockville Financial that is currently held by Rockville Financial MHC. In addition, the existing public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in exchange for their current shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock pursuant to an exchange ratio that ensures that the shareholders will own 41.81% of the common stock of New Rockville Financial after the conversion (without giving effect to any new shares purchased in the offering or cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares). See “IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY OWNERSHIP.” When the conversion is completed, all of the outstanding common stock of Rockville Bank will be owned by New Rockville Financial, and all of the outstanding common stock of New Rockville Financial will be owned by public shareholders (including Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc.). A diagram of our corporate structure before and after the conversion is set forth in the Summary section of this prospectus.
 
New Rockville Financial intends to retain between $44.6 million and $69.9 million of the net proceeds of the offering (after funding the loan to the employee stock ownership plan and the contribution to the charitable foundation) and to invest the balance of the net proceeds in Rockville Bank. The conversion will be consummated only upon the issuance of at least the minimum number of shares of our common stock offered pursuant to this prospectus.
 
We are first offering shares of our common stock in a subscription offering to eligible depositors and our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including our employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan. Shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering will be offered for sale to the general public in a community offering, with a preference given first to natural persons residing in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut, then to the existing shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial and then to all other natural persons residing in Connecticut. We also may offer for sale shares of common stock not subscribed for in the subscription offering or community offering in a syndicated community offering managed by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. is not required to purchase any shares of the common stock that are being offered for sale. For a more complete description of the community offering or syndicated community offering, see “Community Offering” and “Syndicated Community Offering” herein, respectively.


135


Table of Contents

We have the right to accept or reject, in whole or in part, any orders to purchase shares of the common stock received in the community offering or the syndicated offering. The community offering and syndicated offering, if any, may begin at the same time as, during, or after the subscription offering and must be completed within 45 days after the completion of the subscription offering unless otherwise extended by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. See “Community Offering”.
 
We determined the number of shares of common stock to be offering based upon an independent appraisal of the estimated pro forma market value of New Rockville Financial. All shares of common stock are being offered for sale at a price of $10.00 per share. All investors will pay the same purchase price per share. Investors will not be charged a commission to purchase shares of common stock in the offering. The independent valuation will be updated and the final number of the shares of common stock to be issued in the offering will be determined at the completion of the offering. See “Stock Pricing and Number of Shares to be Issued” for more information as to the determination of the estimated pro forma market value of the common stock.
 
The following is a brief summary of the conversion and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the plan of conversion. A copy of the plan of conversion is available for inspection at each branch office of Rockville Bank and at the Connecticut Department of Banking. The plan of conversion is also filed as an exhibit to Rockville Financial MHC’s application to convert from mutual to stock form of which this prospectus is a part, copies of which may be obtained from the Connecticut Department of Banking. See “WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION”.
 
Reasons for the Conversion
 
The Boards of Directors of Rockville Financial MHC, Rockville Financial, Inc. and Rockville Bank approved the conversion and reorganization as being in the best interests of Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank and their respective shareholders, customers, suppliers and the local communities in which they operate. The purpose of converting to the fully public stock form of ownership and conducting the offering at this time is to provide us with additional capital to take advantage of potential growth and strategic opportunities, support our continued planned growth and successfully implement our business strategies.
 
Although Rockville Bank is categorized as “well capitalized” and does not require additional capital, our Board of Directors has determined that current opportunities for continued growth make pursuing the conversion and offering at this time desirable. As a fully converted stock holding company, we will have greater flexibility in structuring mergers and acquisitions, including the form of consideration that we can use to pay for an acquisition. Our current mutual holding company structure limits our ability to offer shares of our common stock as consideration for a merger or acquisition since Rockville Financial MHC is required to own a majority of our shares of common stock. Our ability to compete with other financial institutions for acquisition opportunities will be enhanced by our ability to offer stock or cash consideration, or a combination of stock and cash consideration in potential business transactions. Our new stock holding company structure will enable us to offer stock or cash consideration, or a combination of stock and cash, and will therefore enhance our ability to compete with other bidders when acquisition opportunities arise. We do not currently have any agreement or understanding as to any specific acquisition.
 
In addition, the conversion is a necessary and appropriate response to the changing market and regulatory conditions and will allow us to continue to compete effectively in the changing financial services marketplace. Our shareholders will also benefit from the more active and liquid trading market that will exist when its holding company is 100.0% publicly owned.
 
Approvals Required
 
The Boards of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial, Rockville Financial MHC and Rockville Bank have approved the plan of conversion and the contribution to the charitable foundation. The plan of conversion must also be approved by at least (i) 75% of the members of the Board of Directors of the New Holding Company; (ii) 80.0% of the total voting power of the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC; (iii) a majority of the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC who are not employees, officers, directors, trustees or


136


Table of Contents

significant borrowers of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank; (iv) a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast by the shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial (including Rockville Financial MHC); and (v) a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial (not including Rockville Financial MHC) The conversion and contribution must be approved by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner and the Federal Reserve Board and reviewed without objection by the FDIC.
 
Share Exchange Ratio for Current Shareholders
 
On the effective date of the conversion, each publicly held share of Existing Rockville Financial common stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive a number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock, provided that the mutual holding company demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner that the basis for the exchange is fair and reasonable. The number of shares of common stock will be determined pursuant to an exchange ratio which will ensure that the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will own 41.81% of the common stock of New Rockville Financial after the conversion, exclusive of their purchase of additional shares of common stock in the offering or their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional exchange shares. The exchange ratio is not dependent on the market value of New Rockville Financial common stock. The exchange ratio is based on the percentage of Existing Rockville Financial common stock held by the public, the assets of Rockville Financial MHC, the independent valuation of New Rockville Financial prepared by RP Financial and the number of shares of common stock issued in the offering. The exchange ratio is expected to range from 0.9725 exchange shares for each publicly held share of Existing Rockville Financial at the minimum of the offering range to 1.5131 exchange shares for each publicly held share of Existing Rockville Financial at the adjusted maximum of the offering range.
 
The following table shows how the exchange ratio will adjust, based on the valuation of New Rockville Financial and the number of shares of common stock issued in the offering. The table also shows the number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock a hypothetical owner of Existing Rockville Financial common stock would receive in exchange for 100 shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock owned at the consummation of the conversion, depending on the number of shares of common stock issued in the offering.
 
                                                                 
                    Total
           
                    Shares of
           
                    Common
           
            Shares of New Rockville
  Stock to be
      Equivalent
   
            Financial to be Issued
  Issued in
      Value of
  Shares to be
    Shares to be Sold in
  for Shares of Existing
  Conversion
      Shares Based
  Received for
    This Offering   Rockville Financial   and
  Exchange
  Upon Current
  100 Existing
    Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent   Offering   Ratio   Market Price(1)   Shares
 
Minimum
    11,050,000       58.19 %     7,939,517       41.81 %     18,989,517       0.9725     $ 189,895,170       97  
Midpoint
    13,000,000       58.19       9,340,608       41.81       22,340,608       1.1441       223,406,080       114  
Maximum
    14,950,000       58.19       10,741,700       41.81       25,691,700       1.3158       256,917,000       131  
Adjusted Maximum
    17,192,500       58.19       12,352,955       41.81       29,545,455       1.5131       295,454,550       151  
 
 
(1) Represents the value of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock received in the conversion by a holder of one share of Existing Rockville Financial, at the exchange ratio, assuming the market price of $10.00 per share.
 
(2) Valuation and ownership ratios reflect dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets upon completion of the conversion. See “IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY OWNERSHIP” for more information regarding the dilutive impact of Rockville Financial MHC’s assets on the valuation and ownership ratios.
 
Outstanding options to purchase shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock also will convert into and become options to purchase new shares of New Rockville Financial common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be received upon exercise of these options will be determined pursuant to the exchange ratio. The aggregate exercise price, duration and vesting schedule of these options will not be affected by the conversion.


137


Table of Contents

Exchange of Existing Shareholders’ Stock Certificates
 
The conversion of existing outstanding shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock into the right to receive shares of New Rockville Financial common stock will occur automatically on the effective date of the conversion. If you own shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock in a brokerage account in “street name,” you do not need to take any action to exchange your shares of common stock, as the exchange will occur automatically on or about the effective date of the conversion. If you own shares in the form of Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates, you will receive a transmittal form from our transfer agent as soon as practicable after the effective date of the conversion with instructions on how to exchange stock certificates of Existing Rockville Financial common stock for stock certificates of New Rockville Financial common stock. We expect new certificates of New Rockville Financial common stock will be mailed to you within five business days after the transfer agent receives properly executed transmittal forms and your Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates.
 
No fractional shares of New Rockville Financial common stock will be issued to any public shareholder of Existing Rockville Financial. For each fractional share that otherwise would be issued, New Rockville Financial will pay in cash an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying the fractional share interest to which the holder otherwise would be entitled by the $10.00 per share subscription price. Payment for fractional shares will be made as soon as practicable following the receipt by the transfer agent of transmittal forms and the surrendered Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates. If your shares of common stock are held in a brokerage account in street name, you will automatically receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares.
 
You should not submit a stock certificate until you receive a transmittal form, which will include submission instructions.   After the conversion, shareholders will not receive shares of New Rockville Financial common stock and will not be paid dividends on the shares of New Rockville Financial common stock until existing certificates representing shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock are surrendered for exchange in compliance with the terms of the transmittal form. When shareholders surrender their certificates, any unpaid dividends will be paid without interest. For all other purposes, however, each certificate that represents shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock outstanding at the effective date of the conversion will be considered to evidence ownership of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock into which those shares have been converted by virtue of the conversion.
 
If a certificate for Existing Rockville Financial common stock has been lost, stolen or destroyed, our transfer agent will issue a new stock certificate upon receipt of appropriate evidence as to the loss, theft or destruction of the certificate, appropriate evidence as to the ownership of the certificate by the claimant, and appropriate and customary indemnification, which is normally effected by the purchase of a bond from a surety company at the shareholder’s expense.
 
All shares of New Rockville Financial common stock that we issue in exchange for existing shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock will be considered to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such shares of common stock, subject, however, to our obligation to pay any dividends or make any other distributions with a record date prior to the effective date of the conversion that may have been declared by us on or prior to the effective date, and which remain unpaid at the effective date.
 
Effects of Conversion on Depositors, Borrowers and Members
 
Continuity.   While the conversion is being accomplished, the normal business of Rockville Bank of accepting deposits and making loans will continue without interruption. Rockville Bank will continue to be a Connecticut-chartered savings bank and will continue to be regulated by the Connecticut Commissioner of Banking and the FDIC. After the conversion, Rockville Bank will continue to offer existing services to depositors, borrowers and other customers. The directors and executive officers serving Existing Rockville Financial at the time of the conversion will be the directors and executive officers of New Rockville Financial after the conversion.


138


Table of Contents

Effect on Deposit Accounts.   Pursuant to the plan of conversion, each depositor of Rockville Bank at the time of the conversion will automatically continue as a depositor after the conversion, and the deposit balance, interest rate and other terms of such deposit accounts will not change as a result of the conversion. Each such account will be insured by the FDIC to the same extent as before the conversion. Depositors will continue to hold their existing certificates, passbooks and other evidences of their accounts.
 
Effect on Loans.   No loan outstanding from Rockville Bank will be affected by the conversion, and the amount, interest rate, maturity and security for each loan will remain as it was contractually fixed prior to the conversion.
 
Tax Effects.   We will receive an opinion of counsel or tax advisor with regard to federal and state income tax consequences of the conversion to the effect that the conversion will not be taxable for federal or state income tax purposes to Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial, eligible account holders or Rockville Bank. See “Material Income Tax Consequences”.
 
Effect on Liquidation Rights.   If Rockville Financial MHC were to liquidate, all claims of Rockville Financial MHC’s creditors would be paid first. Thereafter, if there were any assets remaining, depositors of Rockville Bank would receive such remaining assets, pro rata, based upon the deposit balances in their deposit accounts at Rockville Bank immediately prior to such liquidation. In the unlikely event that Rockville Bank were to liquidate after the conversion and offering, all claims of creditors (including those of depositors, to the extent of their deposit balances) also would be paid first, following by distribution of the liquidation account to certain depositors, with any assets remaining thereafter distributed to New Rockville Financial as the holder of 100.0% of Rockville Bank’s capital stock. The conversion and reorganization is not treated as a liquidation of Rockville Financial MHC See “Liquidation Rights” below.
 
Liquidation Rights
 
Liquidation Prior to the Conversion:   In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of Rockville Financial MHC or Existing Rockville Financial prior to the conversion, all claims of creditors of Existing Rockville Financial, including those of depositors of Rockville Bank (to the extent of their deposit balances), would be paid first. Thereafter, if there were any assets of Existing Rockville Financial remaining, these assets would be distributed to shareholders, including Rockville Financial MHC.
 
Liquidation Following the Conversion:   The plan of conversion provides for the establishment, upon the completion of the conversion, of a liquidation account by New Rockville Financial for the benefit of eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders, which represents the amount of Rockville Financial MHC’s ownership interest in Existing Rockville Financial’s total stockholders’ equity as of the date of the latest statement of financial condition used in this prospectus.
 
The liquidation account established by New Rockville Financial is designed to provide liquidation payments to eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders who maintain deposits at Rockville Bank in the event of a liquidation of both New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank or of only Rockville Bank. Specifically, in the unlikely event that New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank were to completely liquidate after the conversion, all claims of creditors, including those of depositors, would be paid first, followed by distribution to depositors as of June 30, 2009 and           of the liquidation account maintained by New Rockville Financial. Also, in a complete liquidation of both entities, or of just Rockville Bank, if New Rockville Financial has insufficient assets to fund the liquidation account distribution due to eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders and Rockville Bank has positive net worth, Rockville Bank shall immediately pay amounts necessary to fund New Rockville Financial’s remaining obligations under the liquidation account. If New Rockville Financial is completely liquidated or sold apart from a sale or liquidation of Rockville Bank, then the rights of eligible deposit account holders and supplemental deposit account holders in the liquidation account maintained by New Rockville Financial shall be surrendered and treated as a liquidation account in Rockville Bank and depositors shall have an equivalent interest in the bank liquidation account and the same rights and terms as the liquidation account.


139


Table of Contents

If on any December 31 annual closing date commencing after the effective date of the conversion, the amount in any such deposit account is less than the amount in the deposit account on June 30, 2009 and          , respectively, or any other annual closing date, then the interest in the liquidation account relating to such deposit account would be reduced from time to time by the proportion of any such reduction, and such interest will cease to exist if such deposit account is closed. In addition, no interest in the liquidation account would ever be increased despite any subsequent increase in the related deposit account. Payment pursuant to liquidation rights of eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible account holders would be separate and apart from the payment of any insured deposit accounts to such depositor. Any assets remaining after the above liquidation rights of eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible account holders are satisfied would be available for distribution to shareholders.
 
Under Connecticut regulations, no merger, consolidation, purchase of bulk assets with assumption of deposit accounts and other liabilities, or similar transactions in which New Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank is not the surviving institution will be deemed to be a complete liquidation, and, in any such transaction, the liquidation account shall be assumed by the surviving institution.
 
Stock Pricing and Number of Shares to be Issued
 
The plan of conversion and applicable regulations require that the aggregate purchase price of the common stock sold in the offering must be based on the appraisal of the pro forma market value of New Rockville Financial common stock, assuming the conversion and offering are completed, as determined by an independent valuation. We have retained RP Financial to prepare an independent valuation appraisal. For its services in preparing the initial valuation, RP Financial will receive a fee of $100,000 and up to $10,000 for expenses and an additional $10,000 for each valuation update, as necessary. We have agreed to indemnify RP Financial and its employees and affiliates against specified losses, including any losses in connection with claims under the federal securities laws, arising out of its services as independent appraiser, except where such liability results from its negligence or bad faith.
 
The independent valuation appraisal considered the pro forma impact of the offering. The appraisal applied three primary methodologies: the pro forma price-to-book value approach applied to both reported book value and tangible book value; the pro forma price-to-earnings approach applied to reported and core earnings; and the pro forma price-to-assets approach. The market value ratios applied in the three methodologies were based upon the current market valuations of the peer group companies, subject to valuation adjustments applied by RP Financial to account for differences between New Rockville Financial and the peer group. RP Financial placed the greatest emphasis on the price-to-earnings and price-to-book and price-to-tangible book value approaches in estimating pro forma market value.
 
In preparing its appraisal, RP Financial considered the information in this prospectus, including our financial statements. RP Financial also considered the following factors, among others:
 
  •  our historical, present and projected operating results and financial condition;
 
  •  the economic, demographic and competition characteristics of our market area;
 
  •  a comparative evaluation of our operating and financial statistics with those of other similarly-situated, publicly-traded savings and thrift holding companies;
 
  •  the effect of the capital raised in this offering on our net worth and earnings potential;
 
  •  the trading market for our securities and comparable institutions and general economic conditions in the market for such securities; and
 
  •  the contribution of cash to the charitable foundation.
 
Included in RP Financial’s independent valuation were certain assumptions as to the pro forma earnings of New Rockville Financial after the conversion that were utilized in determining the appraised value. These assumptions included estimated expenses, an assumed after-tax rate of return of 1.18% for the periods ended December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2010, respectively on the net offering proceeds. See “PRO FORMA DATA”


140


Table of Contents

for additional information concerning these assumptions. The use of different assumptions may yield different results.
 
The independent valuation states that as of August 26, 2010, the estimated pro forma market value, or valuation range, of New Rockville Financial ranged from a minimum of $189.9 million to a maximum of $256.9 million, with a midpoint of $223.4 million. The Board of Directors of New Rockville Financial decided to offer the shares of common stock for a price of $10.00 per share. The aggregate offering price of the shares will be equal to the valuation range multiplied by the percentage of Existing Rockville Financial common stock owned by Rockville Financial MHC. The number of shares offered will be equal to the aggregate offering price of the shares divided by the price per share. Based on the valuation range, the percentage of Existing Rockville Financial common stock owned by Rockville Financial MHC and the $10.00 price per share, the minimum of the offering range will be 18,989,517 shares, the midpoint of the offering range will be 22,340,608 shares and the maximum of the offering range will be 25,691,700 shares.
 
The Board of Directors of New Rockville Financial reviewed the independent valuation and, in particular, considered the following:
 
  •  Existing Rockville Financial’s financial condition and results of operations;
 
  •  comparison of financial performance ratios of New Rockville Financial to those of other financial institutions of similar size;
 
  •  market conditions generally and in particular for financial institutions; and
 
  •  the historical trading price of the publicly held shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock.
 
All of these factors are set forth in the independent valuation. The Board of Directors also reviewed the methodology and the assumptions used by RP Financial in preparing the independent valuation and believes that such assumptions were reasonable. The offering range may be amended with the approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, if required, as a result of a greater demand for our shares or changes in market or financial conditions generally. In the event the independent valuation is updated to amend the pro forma market value of New Rockville Financial to less than $189.90 million or more than $295.45 million, the appraisal will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by a post-effective amendment to New Rockville Financial’s registration statement.
 
The appraisal is not intended, and must not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing our common stock. The independent appraisal does not indicate market value. You should not assume or expect that our valuation as indicated in the appraisal means that after the conversion and offering the shares of our common stock will trade at or above the $10.00 per share purchase price. Furthermore, the pricing ratios presented in the appraisal were utilized by RP Financial to estimate our market value and not to compare the relative value of shares of our common stock with the value of the capital stock of the peer group. Because of differences in important factors such as operating characteristics, location, financial performance, asset size, capital structure and business prospects between us and other fully converted institutions, you should not rely on these comparative valuation ratios as an indication as to whether or not our common stock is an appropriate investment for you.
 
Following commencement of the subscription offering, the maximum of the valuation range may be increased by up to 15.0%, or up to $295.5 million, without resoliciting subscribers, which will result in a corresponding increase of up to 15.0% in the maximum of the offering range to up to 29,545,455 shares, to reflect a greater demand for our shares or changes in market or financial conditions. We will not decrease the minimum of the valuation range and the minimum of the offering range without a resolicitation of subscribers. The subscription price of $10.00 per share will remain fixed. See “— Limitations on Common Stock Purchases” as to the method of distribution of additional shares to be issued in the event of an increase in the offering range to up to 17,192,500 shares.
 
If the update to the independent valuation at the conclusion of the offering results in an increase in the maximum of the valuation range to more than $295.5 million and a corresponding increase in the offering


141


Table of Contents

range to more than 29,545,455 shares, or a decrease in the minimum of the valuation range to less than $189.9 million and a corresponding decrease in the offering range to fewer than 18,989,517 shares, then, after consulting with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, we may terminate the plan of conversion, cancel deposit account withdrawal authorizations and promptly return by check all funds received with interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate of interest. Alternatively, we may establish a new offering range, extend the offering period and commence a resolicitation of purchasers or take other actions as permitted by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner in order to complete the offering. In the event that we extend the offering and conduct a resolicitation, purchasers would have the opportunity to maintain, change or cancel their stock orders within a specified period. If a purchaser does not respond during the period, his or her stock order will be canceled and payment will be returned promptly, with interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, and deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be canceled. Any single offering extension will not exceed 90 days; aggregate extensions may not conclude beyond [Date 3], which is two years after the plan of conversion was adopted by our Board of Directors. An increase in the number of shares to be issued in the offering would decrease both a subscriber’s ownership interest and New Rockville Financial’s pro forma earnings and stockholders’ equity on a per share basis while increasing pro forma earnings and stockholders’ equity on an aggregate basis. A decrease in the number of shares to be issued in the offering would increase both a subscriber’s ownership interest and New Rockville Financial’s pro forma earnings and stockholders’ equity on a per share basis, while decreasing pro forma earnings and stockholders’ equity on an aggregate basis. For a presentation of the effects of these changes, see “PRO FORMA DATA”.
 
Copies of the independent valuation appraisal report of RP Financial and the detailed memorandum setting forth the method and assumptions used in the appraisal report are available for inspection at the main office of Rockville Bank and as specified under “WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION”.
 
Subscription Offering and Subscription Rights
 
In accordance with the plan of conversion, rights to subscribe for shares of common stock in the subscription offering have been granted in the following descending order of priority. The filling of all subscriptions that we receive will depend on the availability of common stock after satisfaction of all subscriptions of all persons having priority rights in the subscription offering and the minimum, maximum and overall purchase and ownership limitations set forth in the plan of conversion and as described below under “Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”.
 
Priority 1: Eligible Deposit Account Holders:   Each Rockville Bank depositor with an aggregate deposit account balances of $50.00 or more (a “Qualifying Deposit”) at the close of business on June 30, 2009 (an “eligible deposit account holder”) will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase up to the greater of 5.0% shares of our common stock or 15 times the product obtained by multiplying the number of subscription shares offered by a fraction of which the numerator is the total amount of the Qualifying Deposit account balances of the eligible deposit account holder and the denominator is the total amount of Qualifying Deposit account balances of all eligible deposit account holders, subject to the overall purchase limitations. See “Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”. If there are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, shares will be allocated among the subscribers so as to permit each eligible deposit account holder to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make his or her total allocation equal to, to the extent possible, the lesser of 100 shares or the number of shares for which he or she subscribed. Any shares or remaining after such allocation will be allocated among the subscribing eligible deposit account holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied in the proportion that the amount of each such eligible deposit account holder’s Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of all eligible deposit account holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied. If the amount so allocated exceeds the amount subscribed for by any one or more eligible deposit account holders, the excess shall be reallocated on the same principle (one or more times as necessary) among those eligible deposit account holders whose subscriptions are still not fully satisfied, until all available shares have been allocated or all subscriptions have been satisfied.


142


Table of Contents

To ensure proper allocation of our shares of common stock, each eligible deposit account holder must list on his or her stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she had an ownership interest on June 30, 2009. In the event of oversubscription, failure to list an account could result in fewer shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed. In the event of an oversubscription, the subscription rights of eligible deposit account holders who are also directors or executive officers of Existing Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank and their associates will be subordinated to the subscription rights of other eligible deposit account holders to the extent attributable to increased deposits during the one-year preceding June 30, 2009.
 
Priority 2: Tax-Qualified Plans:   Our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including our employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan, will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase in the aggregate up to 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering, including any shares to be issued as a result of an increase in the offering valuation range. Our employee stock ownership plan intends to purchase up to 4.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering with the remaining shares in this purchase priority allocated to our 401(k) plan and any other tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan. If, after the satisfaction of the subscriptions of eligible deposit account holders, a sufficient number of shares is not available to fill the subscriptions by our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, the subscriptions shall be filled to the maximum extent possible. If financial or market conditions warrant, in the judgment of its trustees, the employee stock ownership plan may elect to purchase shares in the open market or authorized but unissued shares directly from New Rockville Financial following the completion of the conversion.
 
Priority 3: Supplemental Eligible Deposit Account Holders:   Each Rockville Bank depositor with a Qualifying Deposit at the close of business on           (a “supplemental eligible deposit account holder”) will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase up to the greater of 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering, or 15 times the product obtained by multiplying the number of subscription shares offered by a fraction of which the numerator is the total amount of the Qualifying Deposit account balances of the supplemental eligible deposit account holder and the denominator is the total amount of Qualifying Deposit account balances of all supplemental eligible deposit account holders, subject to the overall purchase limitations. See “Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”. If there are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, shares will be allocated among the subscribers so as to permit each supplemental eligible deposit account holder to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make his or her total allocation equal to, to the extent possible, the lesser of 100 shares or the number of shares for which he or she subscribed. Any shares remaining after such allocation will be allocated among the subscribing supplemental eligible deposit account holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied in the proportion that the amount of each such supplemental eligible deposit account holder’s Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of all supplemental eligible deposit account holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied. If the amount so allocated exceeds the amount subscribed for by any one or more supplemental eligible deposit account holders, the excess shall be reallocated on the same principle (one or more times as necessary) among those supplemental eligible deposit account holders whose subscriptions are still not fully satisfied, until all available shares have been allocated or all subscriptions have been satisfied.
 
To ensure proper allocation of our shares of common stock, each supplemental eligible deposit account holder must list on his or her stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she had an ownership interest on          . In the event of oversubscription, failure to list an account could result in fewer shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed.
 
Expiration Date:   The subscription offering will expire at 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], unless extended by us for up to 45 days or such additional periods with the approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, if necessary. Subscription rights will expire whether or not each eligible depositor can be located. We may decide to extend the expiration date of the subscription offering for any reason, whether or not subscriptions have been received for shares at the minimum, midpoint or maximum of the offering range. Subscription rights which have not been exercised prior to the expiration date will become void.


143


Table of Contents

The minimum number of shares you may order is 25 shares. The offering is expected to expire at 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], but we may extend this expiration date without notice to you until [Date 2] or longer if the Connecticut Banking Commissioner approves a later date. Once submitted, orders are irrevocable unless the offering is terminated or is extended beyond [Date 2], or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to less than 11,050,000 shares, in which event we will resolicit subscribers, and you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order. If you do not provide us with a written indication of your intent, your funds will be returned to you, with interest. Funds received prior to the completion of the offering will be held in a segregated account at Rockville Bank. All subscriptions received will bear interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, which is currently     % per annum.
 
Community Offering
 
To the extent that shares of common stock remain available for purchase after satisfaction of all subscriptions of eligible deposit account holders, our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans and supplemental eligible deposit account holders, we may offer shares pursuant to the plan of conversion to members of the general public in a community offering, with preferences given to the following classes of persons:
 
(i) Natural persons residing in the counties of Hartford, New London and Tolland, Connecticut;
 
(ii) Existing Rockville Financial’s public shareholders as of [Shareholder Record Date]; and
 
(iii) Natural persons residing elsewhere in Connecticut.
 
Subscribers in the community offering may purchase up to 5.0% of common stock sold in the offering, subject to the overall purchase limitations. See “Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”. If there are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, subscriptions shall be filled up to a maximum of 2.0% of the total shares sold in the offering, and thereafter, remaining shares shall be allocated on an equal number of shares basis per order until all orders have been satisfied. If we do not have sufficient shares of common stock available to fill the orders of natural persons residing in the Counties of Hartford, New London and Tolland, we will allocate the available shares among those persons in a manner that permits each of them, to the extent possible, to purchase the lesser of 100 shares or the number of shares subscribed for by such person. The allocation procedures described above will also apply in the case of an oversubscription by other subscribers in the community offering.
 
The minimum purchase is 25 shares. The opportunity to purchase shares of common stock in the community offering category is subject to our right, in our sole discretion, to accept or reject any such orders in whole or in part either at the time of receipt of an order or as soon as practicable following the expiration date of the offering.
 
The term “residing” or “resident” as used in this prospectus means any person who occupies a dwelling within the counties of Hartford, New London and Tolland, Connecticut, has a present intent to remain within this community for a period of time, and manifests the genuineness of that intent by establishing an ongoing physical presence within the community, together with an indication that this presence within the community is something other than merely transitory in nature. We may utilize deposit or loan records or other evidence provided to us to decide whether a person is a resident. In all cases, however, the determination shall be in our sole discretion.
 
Expiration Date:   The community offering, if any, may begin concurrently with, during or after the subscription offering, and is currently expected to terminate at the same time as the subscription offering, and must terminate no more than 45 days following the subscription offering. New Rockville Financial may decide to extend the community offering for any reason and is not required to give purchasers notice of any such extension unless such period extends beyond [Date 2]. In the event the offering is terminated or is extended beyond [Date 2], or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to less than 11,050,000 shares, in which event we will resolicit subscribers, and you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order. If you do not provide us with a


144


Table of Contents

written indication of your intent, your funds will be returned to you, with interest. Funds received prior to the completion of the offering will be held in a segregated account at Rockville Bank. All subscriptions received will bear interest at Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, which is currently     % per annum.
 
Syndicated Community Offering
 
As a final step in the conversion, the plan of conversion provides that, if feasible, all shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering and community offering, if any, may be offered for sale to selected members of the general public in a syndicated community offering through a syndicate of registered broker-dealers managed by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. as agent of New Rockville Financial. We refer to this as the syndicated community offering. We expect that the syndicated community offering will begin as soon as practicable after termination of the subscription offering and the community offering, if any. We, in our sole discretion, have the right to reject orders in whole or in part received in the syndicated community offering. Neither Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. nor any registered broker-dealer shall have any obligation to take or purchase any shares of common stock in the syndicated community offering; however, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. has agreed to use its best efforts in the sale of shares in any syndicated community offering. The syndicated community offering would terminate no later than [Date 2] unless extended by us, with approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner.
 
The price at which common stock is sold in the syndicated community offering will be the same price at which shares are offered and sold in the subscription offering and community offering. No person may purchase in the syndicated offering more than 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering, subject to the maximum purchase limitations. See “Limitations on Common Stock Purchases”. Unless the Connecticut Department of Banking permits otherwise, accepted orders for New Rockville Financial common stock in the syndicated community offering will first be filled up to a maximum of 5.0% of the shares sold in the offering, and thereafter any remaining shares will be allocated on an equal number of shares basis per order until all shares have been allocated.
 
If a syndicated community offering is held, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will serve as sole book running manager. In such capacity, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. may form a syndicate of other broker-dealers who are Financial Industry Regulatory Authority member firms. Neither Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. nor any registered broker-dealer will have any obligation to take or purchase any shares of the common stock in the syndicated community offering. The syndicated community offering will be conducted in accordance with certain Securities and Exchange Commission rules applicable to best efforts offerings. Under these rules, Keefe Bruyette and Woods, Inc. or the other broker-dealers participating in the syndicated community offering generally will accept payment for shares of common stock to be purchased in the syndicated community offering through a “sweep” arrangement under which a customer’s brokerage account at the applicable participating broker-dealer will be debited in the amount of the purchase price for the shares of common stock that such customer wishes to purchase in the syndicated community offering on the settlement date. Customers who authorize participating broker-dealers to debit their brokerage accounts are required to have the funds for the payment in their accounts on, but not before, the settlement date, which will only occur if the minimum of the offering range is met. Customers who do not wish to authorize participating broker-dealers to debit their brokerage accounts will not be permitted to purchase shares of common stock in the syndicated community offering.
 
The closing of the syndicated community offering is subject to conditions set forth in an agency agreement among New Rockville Financial on one hand and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. on the other hand. If and when all the conditions for the closing are met, funds for common stock sold in the syndicated community offering, less fees and commissions payable by us, will be delivered promptly to us. If the offering is consummated, but some or all of an interested investor’s funds are not accepted by us, those funds will be returned to the interested investor promptly after closing, without interest. If the offering is not consummated, funds in the account will be returned promptly, without interest, to the potential investor. Normal customer ticketing will be used for order placement. In the syndicated community offering, order forms will not be used.


145


Table of Contents

The syndicated community offering will be completed within 45 days after the termination of the subscription offering, unless extended by New Rockville Financial with the approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner.
 
If for any reason we cannot effect a syndicated community offering, or in the event that there is an insignificant number of shares remaining unsold after the subscription, community and any syndicated community offerings, we will try to make other arrangements for the sale of unsubscribed shares, if possible. The Connecticut Banking Commissioner must approve any such arrangements.
 
Limitations on Common Stock Purchases
 
The plan of conversion includes the following limitations on the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased in the offering:
 
  •  The minimum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased is 25.
 
  •  No individual, singly or together with any associates, and no group of persons acting in concert may purchase more than 5.0% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering. Unless we determine otherwise, persons having the same address and persons exercising subscription rights through qualifying deposit accounts registered to the same address will be subject to this overall purchase limitation.
 
  •  No person, together with any associate or persons acting in concert may purchase shares of common stock, that when combined with any shares of common stock received in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial, would exceed 5.0% of the total number of shares of New Rockville Financial outstanding after the consummation of the offering and the conversion, provided, however, that this limitation does not require a shareholder to divest any shares of New Rockville Financial received in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial or otherwise limit the amount of shares to be issued to such shareholders in the exchange.
 
Subject to receipt of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s approval, we may increase or decrease the purchase and ownership limitations at any time. We may increase the purchase limitation up to 10.0% of the shares sold in the offering, provided that orders for common stock may not exceed in the aggregate 10.0% of the total shares of common stock sold in the offering. Our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including our stock ownership plan, are authorized to purchase up to 10.0% of the shares sold in the offering, without regard to these purchase limitations.
 
Depending upon the demand for our shares and changes in market or financial conditions, our Board of Directors, with the approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, may decrease or increase the purchase and ownership limitations. If a purchase limitation is increased, subscribers in the subscription offering who ordered the maximum amount will be given, and, in our sole discretion, some other large subscribers who through their subscriptions evidence a desire to purchase the maximum allowable number of shares, may be given the opportunity to increase their subscriptions up to the then applicable limit. The effect of this type of resolicitation will be an increase in the number of shares of common stock owned by subscribers who choose to increase their subscriptions.
 
In the event of an increase in the offering range of up to 17,192,500 shares of common stock, shares will be allocated in the following order of priority in accordance with the plan of conversion:
 
(i) to fill the subscriptions of our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including the employee stock ownership plan, for up to 10.0% of the total number of shares of common stock issued in the offering;
 
(ii) in the event that there is an oversubscription at the eligible deposit account holder, supplemental eligible deposit account holder or officer, director, employee and corporator levels, to fill unfilled subscriptions of these subscribers according to their respective priorities; and
 
(iii) to fill unfilled subscriptions in the community offering, with preference given first to natural persons residing in the counties of Hartford, New London and Tolland, Connecticut, then to Existing


146


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial’s public shareholders as of [Shareholder Record Date] and then to natural persons residing in Connecticut.
 
The term “associate” of a person means:
 
(i) any corporation or organization (other than Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, New Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank or a majority-owned subsidiary of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, New Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank) of which the person is an officer, partner or 10.0% beneficial shareholder;
 
(ii) any trust or other estate in which the person has a substantial beneficial interest or serves as a trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; provided, however, it does not include any employee stock benefit plan in which the person has a substantial beneficial interest or serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; and
 
(iii) any blood or marriage relative of the person, who either lives in the same home as the person or who is a director or senior officer of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, New Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank or any of their subsidiaries.
 
The term “acting in concert” means:
 
(i) knowing participation in a joint activity or interdependent conscious parallel action towards a common goal whether or not pursuant to an express agreement; or
 
(ii) a combination or pooling of voting or other interests in the securities of an issuer for a common purpose pursuant to any contract, understanding, relationship, agreement or other arrangement, whether written or otherwise.
 
A person or company that acts in concert with another person or company (“other party”) will also be deemed to be acting in concert with any person or company who is also acting in concert with that other party, except that any tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan will not be deemed to be acting in concert with its trustee or a person who serves in a similar capacity solely for the purpose of determining whether common stock held by the trustee and common stock held by the employee stock benefit plan will be aggregated.
 
We have the sole discretion to determine whether prospective purchasers are “associates” or “acting in concert”. Persons having the same address and persons exercising subscription rights through qualifying deposits registered at the same address will be deemed to be acting in concert unless we determine otherwise.
 
Our directors are not treated as associates of each other solely because of their membership on the Board of Directors. Common stock purchased in the offering will be freely transferable except for shares purchased by executive officers and directors of New Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank and except as described below. Any purchases made by any associate of New Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank for the explicit purpose of meeting the minimum number of shares of common stock required to be sold in order to complete the offering shall be made for investment purposes only and not with a view toward redistribution. In addition, under Financial Industry Regulatory Authority guidelines, members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and their associates are subject to certain restrictions on transfer of securities purchased in accordance with subscription rights and to certain reporting requirements upon purchase of these securities. For a further discussion of limitations on purchases of our shares of common stock at the time of conversion and thereafter, see “Certain Restrictions on Purchase or Transfer of Our Shares after Conversion” and “Restrictions on Acquisition of New Rockville Financial”.
 
Plan of Distribution; Selling Agent Compensation
 
Offering materials have been initially distributed to certain persons by mail, with additional copies made available through our Stock Information Center.


147


Table of Contents

We have engaged Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, as a selling agent in connection with the offering of our common stock. In its role as selling agent, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., will:
 
  •  provide advice on the financial and securities market implications of the plan of conversion and any related corporate documents, including our business plan;
 
  •  assist in structuring our stock offering, including developing and assisting in implementing a marketing strategy for the offering;
 
  •  review all offering documents, including this prospectus, stock order forms, letters, brochures and other related offering materials (we are responsible for the preparation and filing of such documents);
 
  •  assist us in preparing for and scheduling meetings with potential investors and broker-dealers, as necessary;
 
  •  assist us in analyzing proposals from outside vendors retained in connection with the offering, including printers, transfer agents and appraisal firms;
 
  •  assist us in the drafting and distribution of press releases as required or appropriate in connection with the offering;
 
  •  meet with the Board of Directors and management to discuss any of these services; and
 
  •  provide such other financial advisory and investment banking services in connection with the offering as may be agreed upon by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. and us.
 
For these services, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will receive a management fee of $30,000, payable in four consecutive monthly installments commencing in August, 2010, which will be credited against the success fees in the subscription and community offerings. A success fee of 0.75% of the aggregate dollar amount of the common stock sold in the subscription offering and the community offering will be paid to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., each if the conversion is consummated, excluding shares purchased by our directors, officers and employees and members of their immediate families, our employee stock ownership plan and our tax-qualified or stock-based compensation or similar plans (except individual retirement accounts), or any charitable foundation established by us (or shares contributed to the charitable foundation).
 
The plan of conversion provides that, if necessary, all shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering and community offering may be offered for sale to the general public in a syndicated community offering to be managed by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. In such capacity, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. may form a syndicate of other broker-dealers. Neither Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. nor any registered broker-dealer will have any obligation to take or purchase any shares of common stock in the syndicated community offering; however, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. has agreed to use its best efforts in the sale of shares in any syndicated community offering. If there is a syndicated community offering, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will receive a management fee not to exceed 5.5% of the aggregate dollar amount of the common stock sold in the syndicated community offering. Of this amount, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will pass on to selected broker-dealers, who assist in the syndicated community offering, an amount competitive with gross underwriting discounts charged at such time for comparable amounts of stock sold at a comparable price per share in a similar market environment.
 
We also will reimburse Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with its marketing effort up to a maximum of $50,000. In addition, we will reimburse Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. for fees and expenses of its counsel not to exceed $100,000. If the plan of conversion is terminated or if Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.’s engagement is terminated in accordance with the provisions of the agreement, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will only receive reimbursement of its actual reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and the portion of the management fee payable and will return any amounts paid or advanced by us in excess of these amounts. We will indemnify Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. against liabilities and expenses (including legal fees) related to or arising out of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.’s engagement as our selling agent and performance of services as our selling agent.


148


Table of Contents

We have also engaged Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. to act as our conversion agent in connection with the stock offering. In its role as conversion agent, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will, among other things:
 
  •  consolidate accounts and develop a central file;
 
  •  prepare proxy forms and proxy materials;
 
  •  tabulate proxies and ballots;
 
  •  act as inspector of election at the special meeting of members;
 
  •  assist us in establishing and managing the Stock Information Center;
 
  •  assist our financial printer with labeling of stock offering materials;
 
  •  process stock order forms and certification forms and produce daily reports and analysis;
 
  •  assist our transfer agent with the generation and mailing of stock certificates;
 
  •  advise us on interest and refund calculations; and
 
  •  create tax forms for interest reporting.
 
For these services, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will receive a fee of $25,000, and we have made an advance payment of $10,000 to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. with respect to this fee. We also will reimburse Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with its acting as conversion agent not to exceed $5,000. If the plan of conversion is terminated or if Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.’s engagement is terminated in accordance with the provisions of the agreement, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will be entitled to the advance payment and also receive reimbursement of its actual reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We will indemnify Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. against liabilities and expenses (including legal fees) related to or arising out of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.’s engagement as our conversion agent and performance of services as our conversion agent.
 
Some of our directors and executive officers may participate in the solicitation of offers to purchase common stock. These persons will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation. Other regular employees of Rockville Bank may assist in the offering, but only in ministerial capacities, and may provide clerical work in effecting a sales transaction. No offers or sales may be made by tellers or at the teller counters. Investment-related questions of prospective purchasers will be directed to executive officers or registered representatives of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Our other employees have been instructed not to solicit offers to purchase shares of common stock or provide advice regarding the purchase of common stock. We will rely on Rule 3a4-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and sales of common stock will be conducted within the requirements of Rule 3a4-1, so as to permit officers, directors and employees to participate in the sale of common stock. None of our officers, directors or employees will be compensated in connection with their participation in the offering.
 
Lock-up Agreements
 
We and each of our directors and officers have agreed, for a period beginning on the date of this prospectus and ending 90 days after completion of the stock offering, not to, without the prior written consent of Keefe Bruyette & Woods, directly or indirectly (i) offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of, or otherwise dispose of or transfer any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for common stock, or file any registration statement under the Securities Act, as amended, with respect to any of the foregoing or (ii) enter into any swap or any other agreement or any transaction that transfers, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, the economic consequence of ownership of common stock, whether any such swap or transaction is to be settled by delivery of common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise. The restricted period described above is subject to extension under limited circumstances. In the event that either (1) during the period that begins on the date that is 15 calendar days plus three business days before the last day of the restricted period and ends on the last day of the restricted


149


Table of Contents

period, we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to us occurs, or (2) prior to the expiration of the restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the restricted period, the restrictions set forth herein will continue to apply until the expiration of the date that is 15 calendar days plus three business days after the date on which the earnings release is issued or the material news or event related to us occurs.
 
Prospectus Delivery
 
To ensure that each purchaser receives a prospectus at least 48 hours before the expiration date of the offering in accordance with Rule 15c2-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we may not mail a prospectus any later than five days prior to the expiration date or hand deliver any later than two days prior to the expiration date. Execution of an order form will confirm receipt of delivery in accordance with Rule 15c2-8. Order forms will only be distributed with or preceded by a prospectus.
 
In the syndicated community offering, a prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the Internet sites or through other online services maintained by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. or one or more other members of the syndicate, or by their respective affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and, depending upon the syndicate member, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The members of the syndicate may agree with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be made on the same basis as other allocations.
 
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on the Internet sites referenced in the preceding paragraph and any information contained in any other Internet site maintained by any member of the syndicate is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. or any other member of the syndicate in its capacity as selling agent or syndicate member and should not be relied upon by investors.
 
Deadline for Orders of Common Stock
 
If you wish to purchase shares of common stock, the Stock Information Center must receive (not postmarked) a properly completed and signed original stock order form, together with full payment for the shares of common stock, no later than 12:00 noon, Eastern Time, on [Date 1], unless we extend this deadline. We expect that the community offering, if held, will terminate at the same time, although it may continue until [Date 2] or longer if the Connecticut Banking Commissioner approves a later date. Once submitted, your order is irrevocable unless the offering is terminated or extended beyond [Date 2] or the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased to more than 17,192,500 shares or decreased to fewer than 11,050,000 shares. In either of these cases, you will have the opportunity to confirm, change or cancel your order. If we do not receive a written response from you regarding any resolicitation, we will cancel your order, promptly return to you all funds received by us with interest at the Rockville Bank’s passbook savings rate, and cancel any deposit account withdrawal authorizations. No single extension may last longer than 90 days. All extensions, in the aggregate, may not last beyond [Date 3].
 
Procedure for Purchasing Shares
 
To purchase shares you must deliver a properly completed and signed original stock order form, accompanied by payment or Rockville Bank deposit account withdrawal authorization, as described below. We are not required to accept order forms that are not received by that time, are not signed or are otherwise executed defectively or are received without full payment or without appropriate withdrawal instructions. We are not required to notify subscribers of incomplete or improperly executed order forms, and we have the right to waive or permit the correction of incomplete or improperly executed order forms. We do not represent, however, that we will do so and we have no affirmative duty to notify any prospective subscriber of any such defects.
 
You may submit your order form in one of the following ways: by mail, using the stock order reply envelope provided, by overnight delivery to the Stock Information Center at the address indicated on the stock


150


Table of Contents

order form or by hand-delivery to the Stock Information Center, located at Rockville Bank’s administrative offices at 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. Stock order forms will not be accepted by mail or by hand-delivery at any of our branch offices. We are not required to accept copies or facsimiles of order forms.
 
We reserve the right to waive, or permit the correction of, incomplete or improperly executed stock order forms on a case by case basis, but do not represent that we will do so. Once received by us, you may not change, modify or cancel your order. Our employees and Stock Information Center staff are not responsible for correcting or completing the information provided on the stock order forms we receive, including the account information requested for the purpose of verifying subscription rights. We reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to reject orders received in the community offering, in whole or in part, at the time of receipt or at any time prior to completion of the offering.
 
You are prohibited by law from transferring your subscription rights. If you order stock in the subscription offering, you will be required to state that you are purchasing the stock for yourself and that you have no agreement or understanding to sell or transfer your subscription rights. We intend to take legal action, including reporting persons to federal or state regulatory agencies, against anyone who we believe sells or gives away their subscription rights. Civil suits and criminal prosecutions have been brought against individuals transferring or participating in the transfer of subscription rights in connection with other conversion transactions. We will not accept your order if we have reason to believe that you sold or transferred your subscription rights. In addition, on the order form, you may not add the name of others for joint stock registration who do not have subscription rights or who qualify only in a lower subscription offering priority than you do. You may add only those persons who were eligible to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription date on your eligibility date. The stock order form requires that you list all deposit accounts, giving all names on each account and the account number at the applicable eligibility date. Failure to provide this information, or providing incomplete or incorrect information, may result in a loss of part or all of your share allocation, if there is an oversubscription.
 
By signing the stock order form, you are acknowledging both receipt of this prospectus and that the shares of common stock are not deposits or savings accounts that are federally insured or otherwise guaranteed by Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial or the federal government. However, signing the order form will not result in you waiving your rights under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Payment for Shares
 
Payment for all shares of common stock will be required to accompany all completed order forms for the purchase to be valid. In the subscription offering and community offering, you may pay for your shares only by:
 
1.  Personal Check, bank check or money order.   Personal checks, bank checks and money orders, payable to New Rockville Financial, will be immediately cashed and will be deposited in a separate account with Rockville Bank. Third party and Rockville Bank line of credit checks may not be remitted as payment for your order. We will pay interest in these funds at our passbook savings rate from the date payment is received until completion or termination of the conversion and offering. Wire transfers as payment for shares of common stock ordered will not be permitted or accepted as proper payment. You should not mail cash.
 
2.  Authorized account withdrawal.   The stock order form outlines the types of Rockville Bank deposit accounts that you may authorize for direct withdrawal. You may not request a direct withdrawal from any checking account. The funds you authorize must be in your account at the time your stock order form is received. A hold will be placed on these funds when your stock order form is received, making the funds unavailable to you, provided, however, these funds will not be withdrawn from your accounts until the completion or termination of the conversion and offering and will earn interest at the applicable deposit account rate until then. You may authorize funds from your certificate of deposit accounts without incurring an early withdrawal penalty, with the agreement that the withdrawal is being made for the purchase of shares in the offering. If a withdrawal results in a certificate account with a balance less than


151


Table of Contents

the applicable minimum balance requirement, the certificate will be canceled at the time of withdrawal without penalty and the remaining balance will earn interest at the current passbook rate subsequent to the withdrawal. You may not authorize direct withdrawals from retirement accounts held by Rockville Bank. Funds withdrawn from deposit accounts at Rockville Bank may reduce or eliminate a depositor’s liquidation rights. Please see the section of this prospectus entitled “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Liquidation Rights” for further information.
 
We may not lend funds or extend a line of credit (including line of credit or overdraft checking) to anyone for the purpose of purchasing shares in the offering.
 
We shall have the right, in our sole discretion, to permit institutional investors to submit irrevocable orders together with the legally binding commitment for payment and to thereafter pay for the shares of common stock for which they subscribe in the community offering at any time prior to 48 hours before the completion of the conversion. This payment may be made by wire transfer.
 
If our employee stock ownership plan purchases shares in the offering, it will not be required to pay for such shares until consummation of the offering, provided that there is a loan commitment from an unrelated financial institution or New Rockville Financial to lend to the employee stock ownership plan the necessary amount to fund the purchase.
 
Using IRA Funds to Purchase Shares of Common Stock
 
You may be able to subscribe for shares of common stock using funds in your individual retirement account(s), or IRA. However, shares of common stock must be held in a self-directed retirement account maintained by an unaffiliated institutional trustee or custodian, such as a brokerage firm. Rockville Bank’s individual retirement accounts are not self-directed, so funds in such accounts cannot be invested in our common stock. You may transfer some or all of the funds in your Rockville Bank individual retirement account to a self-directed account maintained by an unaffiliated institutional trustee or custodian. If you do not have such an account, you will need to establish one and transfer your funds before placing your stock order. Because individual circumstances differ and processing of retirement account transactions takes additional time, we recommend that you promptly contact (preferably at least two weeks before the [Date 1] offering deadline) our Stock Information Center for assistance with purchases using your individual retirement account or other retirement account that you may have at Rockville Bank or elsewhere. Whether you may use such funds for the purchase of shares in the stock offering may depend on timing constraints and, possibly, limitations imposed by the institution where the funds are held.
 
Delivery of Stock Certificates
 
Certificates representing shares of common stock sold in the offering will be mailed to the persons entitled thereto at the certificate registration address noted by them on their order form, as soon as practicable following consummation of the offering and receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals. It is possible that until certificates for the common stock are delivered to purchasers, purchasers might not be able to sell the shares of common stock that they ordered, even though the common stock will have begun trading. If you are currently a shareholder of Existing Rockville Financial, see “THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING — Exchange of Existing Shareholders’ Stock Certificates”.
 
Other Restrictions
 
Notwithstanding any other provision of the plan of conversion, no person is entitled to purchase any shares of common stock to the extent the purchase would be illegal under any federal or state law or regulation, including state “blue sky” regulations, or would violate regulations or policies of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, particularly those regarding free riding and withholding. We may ask for an acceptable legal opinion from any purchaser as to the legality of his or her purchase and we may refuse to honor any purchase order if an opinion is not timely furnished. In addition, we are not required to offer shares of common stock to any person who resides in a foreign country, or in a jurisdiction of the United States with respect to which any of the following apply: (i) a small number of persons otherwise eligible to subscribe for


152


Table of Contents

shares under the plan of conversion reside in such jurisdiction; (ii) the granting of subscription rights or the offer or sale of shares of common stock to such persons would require us, under the securities laws of such state, to register as a broker, dealer, salesman or agent or to register or otherwise qualify our securities for sale in such state; or (iii) such registration or qualification would be impracticable or unduly burdensome for reasons of cost or otherwise.
 
Restrictions on Selling or Transferring of Subscription Rights and Shares
 
You are prohibited by law from transferring your subscription rights. If you order stock in the subscription offering, you will be required to state that you are purchasing the stock for yourself and that you have no agreement or understanding to sell or transfer your subscription rights. We intend to take legal action, including reporting persons to federal or state regulatory agencies, against anyone who we believe sells or gives away their subscription rights. Civil suits and criminal prosecutions have been brought against individuals transferring or participating in the transfer of subscription rights in connection with other conversion transactions. We will not accept your order if we have reason to believe that you sold or transferred your subscription rights. In addition, on the order form, you may not add the name of others for joint stock registration who do not have subscription rights or who qualify only in a lower subscription offering priority than you do. You may add only those persons who were eligible to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription date on your eligibility date. The stock order form requires that you list all deposit accounts, giving all names on each account and the account number at the applicable eligibility date. Failure to provide this information, or providing incomplete or incorrect information, may result in a loss of part or all of your share allocation, if there is an oversubscription.
 
Stock Information Center
 
Our banking personnel may not, by law, assist with investment-related questions about the offering. If you have any questions regarding the conversion or offering, please call our Stock Information Center, Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Stock Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank holidays. The toll-free phone number is (  )          -          . In addition, a representative of Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, Inc. will be available to meet with you in person between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
 
Material Income Tax Consequences
 
Completion of the conversion is subject to the prior receipt of an opinion of counsel or tax advisor with respect to federal and state income tax consequences of the conversion to Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, New Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank, eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders. Unlike private letter rulings, opinions of counsel or tax advisors are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any state taxing authority, and such authorities may disagree with such opinions. In the event of such disagreement, there can be no assurance that New Rockville Financial or Rockville Bank would prevail in a judicial proceeding.
 
Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank and New Rockville Financial have received an opinion of counsel, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, regarding all of the material federal income tax consequences of the conversion, which includes the following:
 
1. The merger of Rockville Financial MHC with and into Existing Rockville Financial will qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
2. The constructive exchange of eligible deposit account holders’ and supplemental eligible deposit account holders’ liquidation interests in Rockville Financial MHC for liquidation interests in Existing Rockville Financial will satisfy the continuity of interest requirement of Section 1.368-1(b) of the Federal Income Tax Regulations.


153


Table of Contents

3. None of Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, eligible deposit account holders nor supplemental eligible deposit account holders, will recognize any gain or loss on the transfer of the assets of Rockville Financial MHC to Existing Rockville Financial in constructive exchange for a liquidation interest established in Existing Rockville Financial for the benefit of such persons who remain depositors of Rockville Bank.
 
4. The basis of the assets of Rockville Financial MHC and the holding period of such assets to be received by Existing Rockville Financial will be the same as the basis and holding period in such assets in the hands of Rockville Financial MHC immediately before the exchange. (Sections 362(b) and 1223(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.)
 
5. The merger of Existing Rockville Financial with and into New Rockville Financial will constitute a mere change in identity, form or place of organization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code and therefore will qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code. Neither Existing Rockville Financial nor New Rockville Financial will recognize gain or loss as a result of such merger. (Sections 361(a) and 1032(a) of the Internal Revenue Code).
 
6. The basis of the assets of Existing Rockville Financial and the holding period of such assets to be received by New Rockville Financial will be the same as the basis and holding period in such assets in the hands of Existing Rockville Financial immediately before the exchange. (Sections 362(b) and 1223(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.)
 
7. Current shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will not recognize any gain or loss upon their exchange of Existing Rockville Financial common stock for New Rockville Financial common stock.
 
8. Eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders will not recognize any gain or loss upon their constructive exchange of their liquidation interests in Existing Rockville Financial for the liquidation accounts in New Rockville Financial.
 
9. The constructive exchange of the eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders liquidation interests in Existing Rockville Financial for interests in a liquidation account established in New Rockville Financial will satisfy the continuity of interest requirement of Section 1.368-1(b) of the Federal Income Tax Regulations.
 
10. Each shareholder’s aggregate basis in shares of New Rockville Financial common stock (including fractional share interests) received in the exchange will be the same as the aggregate basis of Existing Rockville Financial common stock surrendered in the exchange.
 
11. Each shareholder’s holding period in his or her New Rockville Financial common stock received in the exchange will include the period during which the Existing Rockville Financial common stock surrendered was held, provided that the Existing Rockville Financial common stock surrendered is a capital asset in the hands of the shareholder on the date of the exchange.
 
12. Cash received by any current shareholder of Existing Rockville Financial in lieu of a fractional share interest in shares of New Rockville Financial common stock will be treated as having been received as a distribution in full payment in exchange for a fractional share interest of New Rockville Financial common stock, which such shareholder would otherwise be entitled to receive. Accordingly, a shareholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the cash received and the basis of the fractional share. If the common stock is held by the shareholder as a capital asset, the gain or loss will be capital gain or loss.
 
13. It is more likely than not that the fair market value of the nontransferable subscription rights to purchase New Rockville Financial common stock is zero. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized by eligible deposit account holders, or supplemental eligible deposit account holders upon distribution to them of nontransferable subscription rights to purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock. eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders will not realize any taxable income as the result of the exercise by them of the nontransferable subscriptions rights.


154


Table of Contents

14. It is more likely than not that the fair market value of the benefit provided by the liquidation account of Rockville Bank supporting the payment of the New Rockville Financial liquidation account in the event New Rockville Financial lacks sufficient net assets is zero. Accordingly, it is more likely than not that no gain or loss will be recognized by eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders upon the constructive distribution to them of such rights in the Rockville Bank liquidation account as of the effective date of the merger of Existing Rockville Financial with and into New Rockville Financial. (Section 356(a) of the Code.)
 
15. It is more likely than not that the basis of the shares of New Rockville Financial common stock purchased in the offering by the exercise of nontransferable subscription rights will be the purchase price. The holding period of the New Rockville Financial common stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of nontransferable subscription rights will commence on the date on which the right to acquire such stock was exercised.
 
16. No gain or loss will be recognized by New Rockville Financial on the receipt of money in exchange for New Rockville Financial common stock sold in the offering.
 
We believe that the tax opinions summarized above address all material federal income tax consequences that are generally applicable to Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial and persons receiving subscription rights and shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial. With respect to items 8 and 13 above, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP noted that the subscription rights will be granted at no cost to the recipients, are legally non-transferable and of short duration, and will provide the recipient with the right only to purchase shares of common stock at the same price to be paid by members of the general public in any community offering. The firm further noted that RP Financial has issued a letter that the subscription rights have no ascertainable fair market value. The firm also noted that the Internal Revenue Service has not in the past concluded that subscription rights have value. Based on the foregoing, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP believes that it is more likely than not that the nontransferable subscription rights to purchase shares of common stock have no value. However, the issue of whether or not the nontransferable subscription rights have value is based on all the facts and circumstances. If the subscription rights granted to eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders are deemed to have an ascertainable value, receipt of these rights could result in taxable gain to those eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders who exercise the subscription rights in an amount equal to the ascertainable value, and we could recognize gain on a distribution. eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences in the event that subscription rights are deemed to have an ascertainable value.
 
The opinion as to item 14 above is based on the position that: (i) no holder of an interest in a liquidation account has ever received a payment attributable to a liquidation account; (ii) the interests in the liquidation accounts are not transferable; (iii) the amounts due under the liquidation account with respect to each eligible deposit account holder and supplemental eligible deposit account holder will be reduced as their deposits in Rockville Bank are reduced; and (iv) the Rockville Bank liquidation account payment obligation arises only if New Rockville Financial lacks sufficient net assets to fund the liquidation account.
 
In addition, we have received a letter from RP Financial stating its belief that the benefit provided by the Rockville Bank liquidation account supporting the payment of the liquidation account in the event New Rockville Financial lacks sufficient net assets does not have any economic value at the time of the conversion. Based on the foregoing, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP believes it is more likely than not that such rights in the Rockville Bank liquidation account have no value. If such rights are subsequently found to have an economic value, income may be recognized by each eligible deposit account holder or supplemental eligible deposit account holder in the amount of such fair market value as of the date of the conversion.
 
The opinion of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, unlike a letter ruling issued by the Internal Revenue Service, is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service and the conclusions expressed therein may be challenged at a future date. The Internal Revenue Service has issued favorable rulings for transactions substantially similar to the proposed reorganization and stock offering, but any such ruling may not be cited as


155


Table of Contents

precedent by any taxpayer other than the taxpayer to whom the ruling is addressed. We do not plan to apply for a letter ruling concerning the transactions described herein.
 
The federal tax opinion has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to New Rockville Financial’s registration statement. Advice regarding the Connecticut state income tax consequences consistent with the federal tax opinion has also been issued by Hinckley Allen & Snyder LLP, tax advisors to Rockville Financial MHC, Existing Rockville Financial, New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank.
 
Certain Restrictions on Purchase or Transfer of Our Shares after Conversion
 
Unless otherwise approved by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, shares of common stock purchased in the offering by our directors and executive officers generally may not be sold for a period of one year following the closing of the conversion, except in the event of the death of such director or executive officer. Each certificate for such restricted shares will bear a legend giving notice of this restriction on transfer, and instructions will be issued to the effect that any transfer within this time period of any certificate or record ownership of the shares other than as provided above is a violation of the restriction. Any shares of common stock issued at a later date as a stock dividend, stock split, or otherwise, with respect to the restricted stock will be similarly restricted. The directors and executive officers of New Rockville Financial also will be restricted by the insider trading rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Purchases of shares of our common stock by any of our directors, executive officers and their associates, during the three-year period following the closing of the conversion may be made only through a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except with the prior written approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. This restriction does not apply, however, to negotiated transactions involving more than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock or to purchases of our common stock by any of stock benefit plans.
 
Connecticut regulations prohibit New Rockville Financial from repurchasing its shares of common stock during the first year following conversion, except we may seek approval from the Connecticut Banking Commissioner to make repurchases in the following circumstances: (i) repurchases in the open market of up to 5.0% of our outstanding stock in extraordinary circumstances; (ii) repurchases of qualifying shares of a director or pursuant to an offer made to all shareholders, (iii) repurchases to fund management recognition plans that have been ratified by our shareholders, and (iv) repurchases to fund our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans. Any request for approval must provide the purpose of the repurchases, an explanation of any extraordinary circumstances necessitating the repurchases and any additional information required by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner.
 
ROCKVILLE BANK FOUNDATION, INC.
 
General
 
In connection with the conversion and offering and in furtherance of our commitment to our community, we intend to use a portion of the proceeds of the offering to make a cash contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. The amount to be contributed will equal 3.0% of the net offering proceeds. We believe that contributing cash to the foundation will allow our community to share in our growth and financial success. The offering presents us with a unique opportunity to provide a substantial and continuing benefit to our community and to receive the associated tax benefits.
 
Purpose of the Charitable Foundation
 
In connection with the conversion, New Rockville Financial intends to contribute to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. cash equal to 3.0% of the net offering proceeds. The purpose of the charitable foundation is to enhance the relationship between Rockville Bank and the communities in which we operate and to enable these communities to share in our longer-term growth and success. The charitable foundation is dedicated


156


Table of Contents

completely to community activities and the promotion of charitable causes. The foundation allows us to assist the communities within our market area in a manner that reaches beyond community development and lending, and enhances our current activities under the Community Reinvestment Act. By establishing continued ties between the charitable foundation and Rockville Bank, the two organizations can maintain the partnership that has formed within the communities in which Rockville Bank operates. Rockville Bank received an “outstanding” rating in its most recent Community Reinvestment Act examination by the FDIC and the Connecticut Department of Banking.
 
We do not expect the contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. to take the place of our traditional community lending and charitable activities. After the offering, we expect to continue making charitable contributions within our community.
 
Structure of the Charitable Foundation
 
The charitable foundation was established in May 2005 in connection with Existing Rockville Financial’s minority stock issuance. It was organized under Connecticut law as a non-stock corporation. The certificate of incorporation of the foundation provides that it is organized exclusively for charitable purposes as set forth in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The certificate of incorporation also provides that no part of the net earnings of the charitable foundation shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to, its directors, officers or members. The foundation is governed by a board of directors, which currently consists of Michael A. Bars, Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr., Raymond H. Lefurge and William J. McGurk. These directors will continue to serve on the board of the foundation after the conversion and the offering.
 
There are no current plans to change the size of the board of directors following the completion of the conversion. The directors of the foundation are also responsible for directing the activities of the charitable foundation, including the management and voting of the shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial held by the charitable foundation. However, all shares of common stock held by Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. will be voted in the same ratio as all other shares of the common stock on all proposals considered by shareholders of Rockville Financial, Inc.
 
The business experience of our current directors is described in “MANAGEMENT.”
 
Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc.’s place of business is located at our administrative offices. The Board of Directors of Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. appoints such officers and employees as is necessary to manage its operations. To the extent applicable, we will comply with the affiliates restrictions set forth in Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act governing transactions between Rockville Bank and the foundation.
 
Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. receives working capital from:
 
(i) any dividends that are paid on shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, or may be paid on New Rockville Financial common stock in the future;
 
(ii) within the limits of applicable federal and state laws, loans collateralized by the shares of common stock; or
 
(iii) the proceeds of the sale of any of the shares of common stock in the open market from time to time.
 
As a private foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. is required to distribute annually in grants or donations a minimum of 5% of the average fair market value of its net investment assets. One of the conditions imposed on the initial gift of Existing Rockville Financial common stock is that the amount of common stock that may be sold by Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. in any one year shall not exceed 5% of the average market value of the assets held by Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc., except where the Board of Directors of the charitable foundation determines that the failure to sell an amount of common stock greater than such amount would result in a longer-term reduction of the value of its assets and/or would otherwise jeopardize its capacity to carry out its charitable purposes.


157


Table of Contents

Tax Considerations
 
Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. currently qualifies as a Section 501(c)(3) exempt organization under the Internal Revenue Code and is classified as a private foundation. New Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank are authorized by federal law to make charitable contributions. We believe that the offering presents a unique opportunity to provide additional funds to the charitable foundation given the substantial amount of additional capital being raised. We believe that the contribution to Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. is justified given Rockville Bank’s capital position and its earnings, the substantial additional capital being raised in the offering and the potential benefits of the foundation to our community. See “CAPITALIZATION,” “HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA REGULATORY CAPITAL COMPLIANCE,” and “Comparison of Valuation and Pro Forma Data With and Without the Charitable Foundation.”
 
We are permitted to deduct for charitable purposes only an amount equal to 10.0% of our annual taxable income in any one year. We are permitted under the Internal Revenue Code to carry the excess contribution over the five-year period following the contribution to the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. We estimate that all of the contribution should be deductible for federal tax purposes over the six-year period (i.e., the year in which the contribution is made and the succeeding five-year period). However, we do not have any assurance we will have sufficient earnings to be able to use the deduction in full. Any such decision to continue to make additional contributions to the charitable foundation in the future would be based on an assessment of, among other factors, our financial condition at that time, the interests of our stockholders and depositors, and the financial condition and operations of the foundation.
 
As a private foundation, earnings and gains, if any, from the sale of common stock or other assets are exempt from federal and state income taxation. However, investment income, such as interest, dividends and capital gains, is generally taxed at a rate of 2%. Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. is required to file an annual return with the Internal Revenue Service within four and one-half months after the close of its fiscal year. Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. is required to make its annual return available for public inspection. The annual return for a private foundation includes, among other things, an itemized list of all grants made or approved, showing the amount of each grant, the recipient, any relationship between a grant recipient and the foundation’s managers and a concise statement of the purpose of each grant.
 
Regulatory Requirements Imposed on the Charitable Foundation
 
Our regulatory approvals impose the following requirements on the establishment and ongoing operation of the charitable foundation:
 
(i) our banking regulators may examine the charitable foundation at the foundation’s expense;
 
(ii) the charitable foundation must operate according to written policies adopted by its Board of Directors, including a conflict of interest policy;
 
(iii) the charitable foundation may not engage in self-dealing and must comply with all laws necessary to maintain its tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code;
 
(iv) the charitable foundation must vote its shares in the same ratio as all of the other shares voted on each proposal considered by the shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial and, after the conversion, of New Rockville Financial;
 
(v) the charitable foundation may not acquire additional shares of Existing Rockville Financial or New Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock without notifying the Federal Reserve Board;
 
(vi) the charitable foundation will be treated as an affiliate for purposes of Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which governs transactions between affiliates of financial institutions; and
 
(vii) New Rockville Financial will notify the Federal Reserve Board if its direct or indirect ownership in a company, when aggregated with the ownership portion of the charitable foundation, exceeds 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting securities of such company.


158


Table of Contents

 
COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHTS FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF EXISTING
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
 
General
 
As a result of the conversion, existing shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will become shareholders of New Rockville Financial. While Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial are both Connecticut corporations, there are differences in the rights of shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial and shareholders of New Rockville Financial caused by differences in their respective certificates of incorporation and bylaws.
 
This discussion is not intended to be a complete statement of the differences affecting the rights of shareholders, but rather summarizes the material differences affecting the rights of shareholders. See “WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION” for procedures for obtaining a copy of New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
 
Authorized Capital Stock
 
The authorized capital stock of Existing Rockville Financial consists of 29,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value per share. The authorized capital stock of New Rockville Financial consists of 60,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value per share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value per share. Under the Connecticut Business Corporations Act and each of the companies’ respective certificates of incorporation, the Board of Directors may increase or decrease the number of authorized shares without shareholder approval.
 
Existing Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation each authorize their boards of directors to establish one or more series of preferred stock and, for any series of preferred stock, to determine the terms, rights and qualifications of the series, including, but not limited to, the amount of shares in such series, voting rights, dividend rights, conversion and redemption rates and liquidation preferences. As a result, the Board of Director of New Rockville Financial could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock with rights and preferences that would impede the completion of proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of New Rockville Financial that the Board of Directors does not approve. An effect of the possible issuance of preferred stock, therefore, may be to deter a future attempt to gain control of New Rockville Financial. We currently have no plans for the issuance of additional shares for such purposes.
 
Issuance of Capital Stock
 
Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, Rockville Financial MHC is required to own not less than a majority of the outstanding shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. Rockville Financial MHC will no longer exist following consummation of the conversion. Neither of Existing Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation nor New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation contains restrictions on the issuance of shares of capital stock to directors, officers or controlling persons. The rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, however, generally require listed companies, like New Rockville Financial will be, to obtain shareholder approval of most stock benefit plans for directors, officers and employees. Also, shareholder approval of stock benefit plans may be sought in certain instances to qualify such plans for favorable tax treatment under federal income tax law and regulations.
 
Neither the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Existing Rockville Financial nor the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of New Rockville Financial provide preemptive rights to shareholders in connection with the issuance of capital stock.


159


Table of Contents

Voting Rights
 
Neither Existing Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws nor New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide for cumulative voting for the election of directors. For additional information regarding voting rights, see “Limitations on Voting Rights” below.
 
Payment of Dividends
 
Existing Rockville Financial’s ability to pay dividends depends, to a large extent, upon Rockville Bank’s ability to pay dividends to Existing Rockville Financial, and the ability of Rockville Bank to pay dividends to Existing Rockville Financial is restricted by FDIC regulations and Connecticut law. The same restrictions will apply to Rockville Bank’s payment of dividends to New Rockville Financial.
 
Board of Directors
 
Existing Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation require the Board of Directors to be divided into four classes and that the members of each class shall be elected for a term of four years and until their successors are elected and qualified, with one class being elected annually.
 
Under Existing Rockville Financial’s bylaws and New Rockville Financial’s bylaws, any vacancy on the Board of Directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, although less than a quorum of the Board of Directors. A director elected to fill a vacancy, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors, must be elected to serve for a term expiring at the next annual meeting at which directors are elected and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.
 
Under Existing Rockville Financial’s bylaws, any director may be removed for cause by the holders of at least 80.0% of the outstanding voting shares. New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that any director may be removed for cause by the holders of at least 80.0% of the outstanding voting shares, as well as two-thirds of directors then in office.
 
Limitations on Liability
 
The certificate of incorporation of Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial provide that the personal liability of any director to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for certain actions as directors will be limited to the amount of the compensation received by the director for serving the company during the year of the violation if the breach did not (i) involve a knowing and culpable violation of law by the director, (ii) enable the director or an associate of the director to receive an improper personal economic gain, (iii) show a lack of good faith and a conscious disregard for the duty of the director under circumstances in which the director was aware that his or her conduct or omission created an unjustifiable risk of serious injury to the company, (iv) constitute a sustained and unexcused pattern of inattention that amounted to an abdication of the director’s duty, or (v) create liability under Section 36a-58 of the Connecticut General Statutes. These provisions might, in certain instances, discourage or deter shareholders or management from bringing a lawsuit against directors for a breach of their duties even though such an action, if successful, might benefit New Rockville Financial.
 
Indemnification of Directors, Officers, Employees and Agents
 
Under the Connecticut Business Corporations Act, Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial must indemnify a director, who is wholly successful on the merits or otherwise, against any reasonable expenses incurred in defense of any proceeding to which he or she was a party because he or she was a director. In addition, indemnification is permitted in the case of a settlement, a final judgment against such person, or final judgment other than on the merits, if (a) the director conducted himself or herself in good faith and reasonably believed that (i) in the case of conduct in the director’s official capacity, that his or her conduct was in the best interests of the corporation and (ii) in all other cases, that his or conduct was at least not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and (b) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the


160


Table of Contents

director had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial are also permitted to pay ongoing expenses incurred by a director, officer or employee if a majority of disinterested directors or a majority of the issued and outstanding shares not held by an interested director authorizes such advancement upon following proper procedures.
 
The certificates of incorporation of Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial provide that they shall indemnify their current and former directors, officers, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by Connecticut law, including the advancement of expenses.
 
Shareholder’s Right to Examine Books and Records
 
A Connecticut regulation, which is applicable to both Existing Rockville Financial and New Rockville Financial, provides that shareholders may inspect and copy specified books and records upon providing five days prior written notice to the company. Connecticut law also provides that a shareholder may inspect a company’s minutes, records of action, accounting records and records of shareholders, provided that five days prior notice is given and any demand is made in good faith for a particular proper purpose and the records are directly connected with such purpose.
 
Special Meetings of Shareholders
 
Existing Rockville Financial’s bylaws and New Rockville Financial’s bylaws provide that special meetings of shareholders can only be called by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President, or Secretary upon the written request of a majority of the directors or the holders of not less than 10.0% of the voting power of all issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting. The written request must state the purpose or purposes of the meeting. Business to be transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to the purpose or purposes stated in the notice to such meeting.
 
Limitations on Voting Rights
 
Existing Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation provides that a no person may, directly or indirectly, acquire or offer to acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of any class of equity securities without the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s prior written approval. New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation provides that no person may, directly or indirectly, acquire or offer to acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of any class of equity securities without approval of two-thirds of the directors then in office, in addition to the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s prior written approval. In both Existing Rockville Financial’s and New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation, a person who violates this prohibition is not permitted to vote shares in excess of 10.0% and the shares in excess of 10.0% will not be counted in any shareholder vote. Connecticut conversion regulations provide for the same restriction, but only for a period of three years.
 
Rights of Appraisal
 
Connecticut law generally provides that a shareholder of a Connecticut stock corporation that engages in a merger, share exchange, consolidation or disposition of all or substantially all of its assets shall have the right to obtain from such institution payment of the fair or appraised value of his or her stock in the corporation, subject to specified procedural requirements. The regulations also provide, however, that the above requirement does not apply to shares of a corporation traded in an organized market that has at least 2,000 shareholders and a market value of at least $20 million dollars, exclusive of the value of shares held by the corporation’s subsidiaries, senior executives, directors and beneficial owners owning more than 10.0% of such shares.
 
Under Connecticut law, shareholders of New Rockville Financial will not have appraisal rights in connection with a plan of merger, share exchange, disposition of assets, or consolidation to which New Rockville Financial is a party as long as the common stock of New Rockville Financial trades on a national securities exchange and New Rockville Financial has at least 2,000 shareholders.


161


Table of Contents

 
RESTRICTIONS ON ACQUISITION OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
 
Although our Board of Directors is not aware of any effort that might be made to obtain control of New Rockville Financial after the conversion and offering, the Board of Directors believes that it is appropriate to include certain provisions as part of New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws to protect the interests of New Rockville Financial and its shareholders from takeovers which our Board of Directors might conclude are not in the best interests of Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial, our shareholders, our employees, customers, creditors and suppliers and the local community in which we operate.
 
The following discussion is a general summary of the material provisions of New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws, Rockville Bank’s certificate of incorporation and certain other regulatory provisions that may be deemed to have an “anti-takeover” effect. The following description of certain of these provisions is necessarily general and is not intended to be a complete description of the document or regulatory provision in question. New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws are included as part of Rockville Financial MHC’s application for conversion filed with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner and New Rockville Financial’s registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See “WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION”.
 
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of New Rockville Financial
 
New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain a number of provisions relating to corporate governance and rights of shareholders that may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of New Rockville Financial. In addition, these provisions will also render the removal of our Board of Directors or management of New Rockville Financial more difficult. The summaries below are qualified in their entirety by reference to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the Connecticut Business Corporations Act and any other documents referenced in such summary description and from which summary descriptions are derived.
 
Directors:   Our Board of Directors is divided into four classes. The members of each class generally are elected for a term of four years and only one class of directors is elected annually. Thus, it could take at least three annual elections to replace a majority of our Board of Directors. Further, our bylaws impose notice and information requirements in connection with the proposal by shareholders of business to be acted upon at a meeting of shareholders. Our certificate of incorporation provides that directors may only be removed for cause, and only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in officer or the holders of at least 80.0% of the voting power of all of issued and outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote for the election of directors. Our bylaws permit directors to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors in between annual shareholder meetings from the candidates recommended by independent directors serving on the Board.
 
Prohibition on Cumulative Voting:   Our certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative voting for the election of directors.
 
Limitation of Voting Rights:   Our certificate of incorporation provides that for a period of five years after the completion of the conversion, any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock without the prior approval of the Board of Directors and the Connecticut Banking Commissioner will not be entitled or permitted to vote any of the shares of common stock held in excess of the 10.0% limit. Any such excess shares are not counted as outstanding for purposes of determining the affirmative vote necessary to approve any matter submitted to our shareholders for a vote.
 
Restrictions on Call of Special Meetings:   Our bylaws provide that special meetings of shareholders can only be called by the Chairman of our Board of Directors, our President or our Secretary upon the written request of a majority of the Directors or the holders of not less than 10.0% of the voting power of all issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting. The written request must state the purpose or purposes of the meeting. Business to be transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to the purpose or purposes stated in the notice to such meeting. In addition, our Certificate of Incorporation provides that special meetings


162


Table of Contents

of shareholders relating to change in control of New Rockville Financial, Inc. or amendments to its Certificate of Incorporation may only be called at the direction of the Board of Directors.
 
Authorized but Unissued Shares of Preferred Stock:   In the event of a proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of New Rockville Financial that the Board of Directors does not approve, the Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock with rights and preferences that would impede the completion of the transaction. An effect of the possible issuance of preferred stock, therefore, may be to deter a future attempt to gain control of New Rockville Financial.
 
Evaluation of Offers:   Our certificate of incorporation requires our directors to consider the following criteria, among other things, when determining whether to authorize New Rockville Financial to engage in a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or sale of assets other than in the ordinary course of business:
 
(a) our long and short-term interests;
 
(b) the long and short-term interests of our shareholders;
 
(c) the interests of our employees, customers, creditors and suppliers; and
 
(d) community and societal considerations including those of any community in which we have an office.
 
Business Combinations with Interested Shareholders:   We are subject to the provisions of Section 33-844 of the Connecticut Business Corporation Act, which prohibits a Connecticut corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested shareholder” for a period of five years after the date of the transaction on which the person became an interested shareholder, unless the business combination or the purchase of stock by which such person became an interested shareholder was approved by our Board of Directors and by a majority of our independent directors, before the date on which such person became an interested shareholder. A “business combination” generally includes, among other transactions involving the corporation or any subsidiary with (or providing specified financial benefits to) an interested shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an interested shareholder, mergers and consolidations, asset sales and other asset dispositions, and some types of stock issuances. Subject to exceptions, an “interested shareholder” is a person that beneficially owns 10.0% or more of the voting power, or is an affiliate and beneficially owns 10.0% or more of the voting power within a specified period before the date of the transaction.
 
Mergers, Consolidations and other Business Combinations:   In order for us to engage in a merger, consolidation, share exchange or sale of substantially all of our assets other than in the ordinary course of business, we must receive the approval of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office and the affirmative vote of the holders of shares of capital stock having two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock entitled to vote.
 
Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws:   Amendments to our certificate of incorporation must be approved by our Board of Directors and also by a majority of the then-outstanding shares of New Rockville Financial voting stock; provided, however, that approval by at least 80.0% of the then-outstanding voting stock is generally required to amend the following provisions:
 
(i) the limitation on voting rights of persons who directly or indirectly offer to acquire or acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of our common stock without the written prior approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner or the Board of Directors;
 
(ii) the limitations of shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders;
 
(iii) the division of the Board of Directors into four staggered classes;
 
(iv) the ability of the Board of Directors to fill vacancies on the Board;
 
(v) the inability to deviate from the manner prescribed in the bylaws by which shareholders bring business before meetings of shareholders;


163


Table of Contents

(vi) the requirement that at least two-thirds of the directors then in office and 80.0% of stockholders must vote to remove directors, and can only remove directors for cause;
 
(vii) the ability of the Board of Directors to amend and repeal the bylaws;
 
(viii) the requirement of the Board of Directors to consider a variety of criteria in evaluating offers to engage in a merger or other business combination;
 
(ix) the provisions concerning the required approval of business combinations; and
 
(x) the prohibition on cumulative voting for the election of directors.
 
Purpose and Anti-Takeover Effects of New Rockville Financial’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.
 
Our Board of Directors believes that the provisions described above are prudent and will reduce our vulnerability to takeover attempts and certain other transactions that have not been negotiated with and approved by our Board of Directors. These provisions also will assist us in the orderly deployment of the offering proceeds into productive assets during the initial period after the conversion. Our Board of Directors believes these provisions are in the best interests of New Rockville Financial and our shareholders. Our Board of Directors believes that it will be in the best position to determine the true value of New Rockville Financial and to negotiate more effectively for what may be in the best interests of all our shareholders. Accordingly, our Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of New Rockville Financial and all of our shareholders to encourage potential acquirers to negotiate directly with the Board of Directors and that these provisions will encourage such negotiations and discourage hostile takeover attempts. It is also the view of our Board of Directors that these provisions should not discourage persons from proposing a merger or other transaction at a price reflective of the true value of New Rockville Financial and that is in the best interests of all our shareholders, employees, customers, creditors, suppliers and local community.
 
Takeover attempts that have not been negotiated with and approved by our Board of Directors present the risk of a takeover on terms that may be less favorable than might otherwise be available. A transaction that is negotiated and approved by our Board of Directors, on the other hand, can be carefully planned and undertaken at an opportune time in order to obtain maximum value of New Rockville Financial for our shareholders, with due consideration given to matters such as our other constituents, the management and business of the acquiring corporation and maximum strategic development of New Rockville Financial’s assets. Although a tender offer or other takeover attempt may be made at a price substantially above the current market price, such offers are sometimes made for less than all of the outstanding shares of a target company. As a result, shareholders may be presented with the alternative of partially liquidating their investment at a time that may be disadvantageous, or retaining their investment in an enterprise that is under different management and whose objectives may not be similar to those of the remaining shareholders.
 
Despite our belief as to the benefits to shareholders of these provisions of New Rockville Financial’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws, these provisions may also have the effect of discouraging a future takeover attempt that would not be approved by our Board of Directors, but pursuant to which shareholders may receive a substantial premium for their shares over then current market prices. As a result, shareholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction may not have any opportunity to do so. Such provisions will also make it more difficult to remove our Board of Directors and management. Our Board of Directors, however, has concluded that the potential benefits outweigh the possible disadvantages.
 
Conversion Regulations
 
Connecticut regulations prohibit any person from (i) transferring or entering into any agreement or understanding to transfer the legal or beneficial ownership of subscription rights or shares of New Rockville Financial common stock, (ii) announcing an intent to make an offer to purchase shares of New Rockville Financial common stock from another person prior to completion of the conversion or (iii) knowingly acquire more than the maximum purchase allowable under the plan of conversion. Connecticut regulations also provides that for three years after the conversion or such longer period as provided in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, no person may, directly or indirectly, acquire or offer to acquire the beneficial


164


Table of Contents

ownership of more than 10.0% of any class of equity securities without the Connecticut Banking Commissioner’s prior written approval. If a person violates this prohibition, New Rockville Financial shall not permit the person to vote shares in excess of 10.0% and shall not count the shares in excess of 10.0% in any shareholder vote. Our certificate of incorporation provides that these restrictions shall be in force for a period of five years after the conversion.
 
Change in Control Regulations
 
Under the Connecticut Bank Holding Company and Bank Acquisition Act, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner must be given prior notice and not disapprove of an acquisition, tender offer or request or invitation made to securities holders regarding a tender offer or acquisition of any voting securities that would result in a person, directly or indirectly, being the beneficial owner of (i) more than 10.0% of any class of voting securities of such bank or holding company or (ii) more than 25.0% of any class of voting securities of such bank or holding company.
 
Under the Change in Bank Control Act, no person may acquire control, directly or indirectly, of a bank or bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve Board has been given 60 days prior written notice and has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition. A “person” may include an individual, a group of individuals acting in concert or certain entities (e.g., corporations, partnerships, trusts) that own shares of banking organizations but that do not qualify as bank holding company. A person acquires “control” of a banking organization whenever the person acquires ownership, control, or the power to vote 25.0% or more of any class of voting securities institution. Control is also presumed to exist, although rebuttable, if a person or company acquires 10.0% or more, but less than 25.0%, of any class of voting securities and either: (i) the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; or (ii) no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities than the acquirer immediately after the transaction. A procedure is provided in the regulations for challenging the rebuttable presumption of control.
 
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
FOLLOWING THE CONVERSION
 
General
 
Upon completion of the conversion and offering, New Rockville Financial will be authorized to issue 60,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value. New Rockville Financial currently expects to issue in the offering and exchange up to 25,691,700 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment up to 29,545,455 shares. New Rockville Financial will not issue shares of preferred stock in the conversion. Each share of New Rockville Financial common stock will have the same relative rights as, and will be identical in all respects to, each other share of common stock. Upon payment of the subscription price for the common stock, in accordance with the plan of conversion, all of the shares of common stock will be duly authorized, fully paid and nonassessable.
 
The shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial will represent nonwithdrawable capital, will not be an account of an insurable type, and will not be insured by the FDIC or any other government agency.
 
Common Stock
 
Dividends:   New Rockville Financial may pay dividends so long as such payment of dividends would not result in us not being able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course or in our total assets being less than our total liabilities plus any payments that would be owed upon dissolution to our shareholders whose preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the dividend. The payment of dividends by New Rockville Financial is subject to limitations that are imposed by law and applicable regulation. The holders of common stock of New Rockville Financial will be entitled to receive and share equally in dividends as may be declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. If


165


Table of Contents

New Rockville Financial issues shares of preferred stock, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common stock with respect to dividends.
 
Voting Rights:   Upon consummation of the conversion, the holders of common stock of New Rockville Financial will have exclusive voting rights in New Rockville Financial. They will elect New Rockville Financial’s Board of Directors and act on other matters as are required to be presented to them under Connecticut law or as are otherwise presented to them by the Board of Directors. Generally, each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote per share and will not have any right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. For a period of five years after the completion of the conversion, any person who becomes the beneficial owner of more than 10.0% of the then-outstanding shares of New Rockville Financial’s common stock without the prior written approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, however, will not be entitled or permitted to vote any shares of common stock held in excess of the 10.0% limit. If New Rockville Financial issues shares of preferred stock, holders of the preferred stock may also possess voting rights. Certain matters require the approval of 80.0% of our outstanding common stock. As a Connecticut-chartered stock savings bank, corporate powers and control of Rockville Bank are vested in its Board of Directors, who elect the officers of Rockville Bank and who fill any vacancies on the Board of Directors. Voting rights of Rockville Bank are vested exclusively in the owners of the shares of capital stock of Rockville Bank, which will be New Rockville Financial, and voted at the direction of New Rockville Financial’s Board of Directors. Consequently, the holders of the common stock of New Rockville Financial will not have direct control of Rockville Bank.
 
Liquidation:   In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Rockville Bank, New Rockville Financial, as the holder of 100% of Rockville Bank’s capital stock, would be entitled to receive all assets of Rockville Bank available for distribution, after payment or provision for payment of all debts and liabilities of Rockville Bank, including all deposit accounts and accrued interest thereon, and after distribution of the balance in the liquidation account to eligible deposit account holders and supplemental eligible deposit account holders. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of New Rockville Financial, the holders of its common stock would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all its debts and liabilities, all of the assets of New Rockville Financial available for distribution. If preferred stock is issued, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common stock in the event of liquidation or dissolution.
 
Preemptive Rights:   Holders of the common stock of New Rockville Financial will not be entitled to preemptive rights with respect to any shares that may be issued. The common stock is not subject to redemption.
 
Preferred Stock
 
None of the shares of New Rockville Financial’s authorized preferred stock will be issued as part of the offering and conversion. Preferred stock may be issued with preferences and designations as our Board of Directors may from time to time determine. Our Board of Directors may, without shareholder approval, authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock with rights and preferences that would impede the completion of a proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of New Rockville Financial that the Board of Directors does not approve. An effect of the possible issuance of preferred stock, therefore, may be to deter a future attempt to gain control of New Rockville Financial.
 
TRANSFER AGENT
 
The transfer agent and registrar for New Rockville Financial’s common stock is Registrar and Transfer Company.
 
EXPERTS
 
The consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Wolf & Company, P.C., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein. Such consolidated


166


Table of Contents

financial statements are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 included in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Deloitte & Touche, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein. Such consolidated financial statements are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
RP Financial has consented to the publication herein of the summary of its report to New Rockville Financial setting forth its opinion as to the estimated pro forma market value of the shares of common stock upon completion of the conversion and offering and its letter with respect to subscription rights.
 
LEGAL MATTERS
 
Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP of Hartford, Connecticut, counsel to New Rockville Financial, Rockville Financial, Rockville Financial MHC and Rockville Bank, will issue to New Rockville Financial its opinion regarding the legality of the common stock, the state and federal income tax consequences of the conversion and the contribution to the charitable foundation. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. by Silver, Freedman & Taff, L.L.P.
 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that registers the common stock offered in the offering. This prospectus forms a part of the registration statement. The registration statement, including the exhibits, contains additional relevant information about us and our common stock. The rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission allow us to omit certain information included in the registration statement from this prospectus. You may read and copy the registration statement at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference rooms. The registration statement also is available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at website maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at “http://www.sec.gov.” New Rockville Financial has filed an application for approval of the plan of conversion with the Connecticut Department of Banking. This prospectus omits certain information contained in the application. The application may be inspected, without charge, at the offices of the Connecticut Department of Banking, 260 Constitution Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103.
 
A copy of the plan of conversion is available without charge from New Rockville Financial by contacting the Stock Information Center.
 
The appraisal report of RP Financial has been filed as an exhibit to our registration statement and to our application to the Connecticut Department of Banking. Portions of the appraisal report were filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are available on its website as described above. The entire appraisal report is available at the public reference room of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the offices of the Connecticut Department of Banking as described above.
 
In connection with the offering, New Rockville Financial will register its common stock under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, upon such registration, New Rockville Financial and the holders of its common stock will become subject to the proxy solicitation rules, reporting requirements and restrictions on common stock purchases and sales by directors, officers and greater than 10.0% shareholders, the annual and periodic reporting and certain other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the plan of conversion, New Rockville Financial has undertaken that it will not terminate such registration for a period of at least three years following the offering.


167


 

 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
    F-2  
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS
       
    F-3-4  
    F-5  
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
       
    F-6  
    F-7  
    F-8  
    F-9  
    F-10  
 
The registrant, Rockville Financial New, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, which was incorporated on September 16, 2010, has not yet commenced operations and has engaged in only minimal activities to date; accordingly, the financial statements of Rockville Financial New, Inc., have been omitted as they are not required.


F-1


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
The management of Rockville Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
 
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and Directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
 
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, has been audited by Wolf and Company, P.C., an independent registered public accounting firm.
 
     
/s/ William J. McGurk
  /s/ John T. Lund
 
William J. McGurk
  John T. Lund
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
Date: March 10, 2010


F-2


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rockville Financial, Inc.
 
We have audited Rockville Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Rockville Financial Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, because management’s assessment and our audit were conducted to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), our audit of Rockville Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting included controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C). A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Rockville Financial, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements of Rockville Financial, Inc. and our report dated March 10, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.
 
/s/ Wolf & Company, P.C.
Boston, Massachusetts
March 10, 2010


F-3


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rockville Financial, Inc.
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of condition of Rockville Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rockville Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Rockville Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 10, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Rockville Financial Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
/s/ Wolf & Company, P.C.
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 10, 2010, Except for Note 21,
as to which the date is September 16, 2010


F-4


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville, Connecticut
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of condition of Rockville Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Hartford, Connecticut
March 10, 2009


F-5


Table of Contents

 
Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Statements of Condition
(In thousands, except share data)
 
                         
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)              
 
ASSETS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 19,277     $ 18,507     $ 14,607  
Short-term investments
    259       800       294  
                         
Total cash and cash equivalents
    19,536       19,307       14,901  
AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES — at fair value
    114,047       102,751       141,250  
HELD TO MATURITY SECURITIES — at amortized cost
    16,747       19,074       24,138  
LOANS RECEIVABLE (net of allowance for loan losses of $13,144 (unaudited) at June 30, 2010, $12,539 in 2009 and $12,553 in 2008)
    1,383,036       1,361,019       1,291,791  
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK, at cost
    17,007       17,007       17,007  
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE
    4,553       4,287       4,636  
DEFERRED TAX ASSET-Net
    10,516       10,608       11,476  
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT-Net
    15,232       15,863       16,405  
GOODWILL
    1,149       1,070       1,070  
CASH SURRENDER VALUE OF BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
    10,267       10,076       9,705  
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
    2,953       3,061        
PREPAID FDIC ASSESSMENTS
    4,602       5,884        
OTHER ASSETS
    2,369       1,127       694  
                         
    $ 1,602,014     $ 1,571,134     $ 1,533,073  
                         
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
LIABILITIES:
                       
DEPOSITS:
                       
Non-interest-bearing
  $ 157,377     $ 150,484     $ 116,113  
Interest-bearing
    993,002       978,624       926,395  
                         
Total deposits
    1,150,379       1,129,108       1,042,508  
MORTGAGORS’ AND INVESTORS’ ESCROW ACCOUNTS
    5,175       6,385       6,077  
ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
    272,501       263,802       322,882  
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
    11,575       14,411       15,829  
                         
Total liabilities
    1,439,630       1,413,706       1,387,296  
                         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 16)
                       
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
                       
Preferred stock (no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008)
                 
Common stock (no par value; 29,000,000 shares authorized; 19,551,938 (unaudited), 19,554,774 and 19,568,284 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.)
    85,249       85,249       85,249  
Additional paid in capital
    4,354       4,082       3,380  
Unearned compensation — ESOP
    (3,828 )     (4,178 )     (5,035 )
Treasury stock, at cost (698,826 shares at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, respectively, and 695,253 shares at December 31, 2008)
    (9,663 )     (9,663 )     (9,709 )
Retained earnings
    87,027       82,971       75,985  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
    (755 )     (1,033 )     (4,093 )
                         
Total stockholders’ equity
    162,384       157,428       145,777  
                         
    $ 1,602,014     $ 1,571,134     $ 1,533,073  
                         
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-6


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share data)
 
                                         
    Six Months Ended June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                    
 
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
                                       
Loans
  $ 34,998     $ 34,743     $ 69,517     $ 68,458     $ 66,995  
Securities-interest
    2,342       3,478       6,116       7,406       5,600  
Securities-dividends
    218       217       428       1,647       1,180  
Interest-bearing deposits
    3             1       34       102  
                                         
Total interest and dividend income
    37,561       38,438       76,062       77,545       73,877  
                                         
INTEREST EXPENSE:
                                       
Deposits
    5,853       10,632       19,371       25,069       27,081  
Borrowed funds
    5,151       5,242       10,404       9,877       8,496  
                                         
Total interest expense
    11,004       15,874       29,775       34,946       35,577  
                                         
Net interest income
    26,557       22,564       46,287       42,599       38,300  
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    1,812       603       1,961       2,393       749  
                                         
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    24,745       21,961       44,326       40,206       37,551  
                                         
NON-INTEREST INCOME (LOSS):
                                       
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities
          (357 )     (362 )     (13,315 )     (233 )
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt securities
                      (1,566 )      
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive loss debt securities
                             
                                         
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
          (357 )     (362 )     (14,881 )     (233 )
Service charges and fees
    3,234       2,479       5,221       5,131       4,551  
Net gain from sale of securities
    188       936       936       381       508  
Net gain from sale of loans
    523       328       782              
Other income
    107       187       395       382       368  
                                         
Total non-interest income (loss)
    4,052       3,573       6,972       (8,987 )     5,194  
                                         
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
                                       
Salaries and employee benefits
    9,621       9,382       18,571       17,150       16,082  
Service bureau fees
    1,986       1,972       3,872       3,808       3,361  
Occupancy and equipment
    2,182       2,197       4,380       4,103       3,594  
Professional fees
    758       701       1,131       1,484       1,550  
Marketing and promotions
    671       618       1,156       1,315       1,131  
FDIC assessments
    801       1,499       2,222       654       229  
Other real estate owned
    467                          
Other
    2,541       2,450       5,299       5,248       4,354  
                                         
Total non-interest expense
    19,027       18,819       36,631       33,762       30,301  
                                         
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    9,770       6,715       14,667       (2,543 )     12,444  
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
    3,452       2,205       4,935       (956 )     4,116  
                                         
NET INCOME (LOSS)
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328  
                                         
Earnings per share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 0.34     $ 0.24     $ 0.53     $ (0.09 )   $ 0.44  
Diluted
    0.34       0.24       0.53       (0.09 )     0.44  
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
                                       
Basic
    18,519,002       18,451,232       18,469,092       18,428,158       18,750,935  
Diluted
    18,530,557       18,451,232       18,473,665       18,428,158       18,750,935  
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-7


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
 
                                                                         
    (In thousands, except share data)  
                                              Accumulated
       
                Additional
    Unearned
                      Other
    Total
 
    Common Stock     Paid-in
    Compensation
    Retained
    Treasury Stock     Comprehensive
    Stockholders’
 
    Shares     Amount     Capital      — ESOP     Earnings     Shares     Amount     Loss     Equity  
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
    19,574,640     $ 85,249     $ 1,854     $ (6,434 )   $ 76,063           $     $ (1,668 )   $ 155,064  
                                                                         
Comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Net income
                            8,328                         8,328  
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              451       451  
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to employee benefit plans, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              976       976  
                                                                         
Total comprehensive income
                                                    9,755  
                                                                         
Common stock repurchased
                                  496,730       (7,293 )           (7,293 )
Share-based compensation expense
    (4,800 )           1,276       700                               1,976  
Treasury stock issued
                (100 )                                   (100 )
Cancellation of shares for tax withholding
    (1,556 )           (21 )                                   (21 )
Dividends paid, $0.16 per common share
                            (3,008 )                       (3,008 )
                                                                         
Balance at December 31, 2007
    19,568,284       85,249       3,009       (5,734 )     81,383       496,730       (7,293 )     (241 )     156,373  
                                                                         
Comprehensive income loss:
                                                                       
Net loss
                            (1,587 )                       (1,587 )
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              420       420  
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to employee benefit plans, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              (4,272 )     (4,272 )
                                                                         
Total comprehensive loss
                                                                    (5,439 )
                                                                         
Common stock repurchased
                                  291,082       (3,787 )           (3,787 )
Share-based compensation expense
                1,956       699                               2,655  
Treasury stock issued
                (1,371 )                 (92,559 )     1,371              
Cancellation of shares for tax withholding
                (214 )                                   (214 )
Dividends paid, $0.20 per common share
                            (3,691 )                       (3,691 )
SFAS 158 pension remeasurement
                            (120 )                       (120 )
                                                                         
Balance at December 31, 2008
    19,568,284       85,249       3,380       (5,035 )     75,985       695,253       (9,709 )     (4,093 )     145,777  
                                                                         
Cumulative effect of adjustment to retained earnings relating to impairment of securities
                            1,034                   (1,034 )      
Comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Net income
                            9,732                         9,732  
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              1,441       1,441  
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to employee benefit plans, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              2,653       2,653  
                                                                         
Total comprehensive income
                                                                    13,826  
                                                                         
Common stock repurchased
                                  20,000       (198 )           (198 )
Share-based compensation expense
                827                                     827  
ESOP shares released or committed to be released
                71       857                               928  
Forfeited unvested restricted stock
    (9,200 )                                                
Treasury stock issued
                (152 )           (92 )     (16,427 )     244              
Cancellation of shares for tax withholding
    (4,310 )           (44 )                                   (44 )
Dividends paid, $0.20 per common share
                            (3,688 )                       (3,688 )
                                                                         
Balance at December 31, 2009
    19,554,774       85,249       4,082       (4,178 )     82,971       698,826       (9,663 )     (1,033 )     157,428  
                                                                         
Comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Net income
                            6,318                         6,318  
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              83       83  
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to employee benefit plans, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects
                                              195       195  
                                                                         
Total comprehensive income
                                                                    6,596  
                                                                         
Share-based compensation expense
                254                                     254  
ESOP shares released or committed to be released
                48       350                               398  
Cancellation of shares for tax withholding
    (2,836 )           (30 )                                   (30 )
Dividends paid, $0.12 per common share
                            (2,262 )                       (2,262 )
                                                                         
Balance at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
    19,551,938     $ 85,249     $ 4,354     $ (3,828 )   $ 87,027       698,826     $ (9,663 )   $ (755 )   $ 162,384  
                                                                         
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-8


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
 
                                         
    Six Months Ended
       
    June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                    
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
                                       
Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on investments, net
    (89 )     (93 )     (160 )     (59 )     48  
Share-based compensation expense
    254       670       827       1,743       819  
Amortization of ESOP Expense
    398       266       928       912       1,036  
Provision for loan losses
    1,812       603       1,961       2,393       749  
Net gain from sales of securities
    (188 )     (936 )     (936 )     (381 )     (508 )
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities
          357       362       14,881       233  
Loans originated for sale
    (26,122 )     (24,813 )     (43,958 )            
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale
    26,122       19,283       43,958              
Loss/(Gain) on sale of OREO
    91             (16 )            
Depreciation and amortization
    741       816       1,608       1,502       1,416  
Loss on disposal of equipment
    1             34       3       4  
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision
    (151 )     (518 )     (1,242 )     (5,528 )     540  
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
    (191 )     (180 )     (371 )     (383 )     (368 )
Net change in:
                                       
Deferred loan fees and premiums
    (1 )     486       784       113       283  
Accrued interest receivable
    (266 )     (36 )     349       (480 )     317  
Other assets
    40       (254 )     (6,076 )     2,484       (2,979 )
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    (2,637 )     1,635       2,602       167       2,955  
                                         
Net cash provided by operating activities
    6,132       1,796       10,386       15,780       12,873  
                                         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                                       
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
    399       21,171       21,171       5,870       6,448  
Proceeds from calls and maturities of available for sale securities
    470       500       2,500       14,850       61,675  
Principal payments on available for sale mortgage-backed securities
    11,243       14,233       25,525       17,596       11,832  
Principal payments on held to maturity mortgage-backed securities
    2,360       2,509       5,135       1,842        
Principal payments on available for sale securities
    12       23                    
Purchases of available for sale securities
    (22,957 )     (546 )     (8,091 )     (57,030 )     (82,950 )
Purchases of held to maturity securities
                      (25,948 )      
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
                      (5,839 )     (1,332 )
Proceeds from sales of portfolio loans
                161       8,175       574  
Proceeds from sale of OREO
    682             1,859              
Capitalized OREO costs
    (105 )                        
Purchase of loans
    (82 )     (2,529 )     (2,529 )     (26,212 )     (16,656 )
Loan originations, net of principal payments
    (24,306 )     (33,133 )     (74,509 )     (159,933 )     (67,922 )
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (87 )     (532 )     (1,100 )     (3,558 )     (3,148 )
                                         
Net cash (provided by) used in investing activities
    (32,371 )     1,696       (29,878 )     (230,187 )     (91,479 )
                                         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                                       
Net increase in non-interest-bearing deposits
    6,893       6,618       34,371       16,735       6,310  
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits
    14,378       60,056       52,229       74,735       60,217  
Net (decrease) increase in mortgagors’ and investors’ escrow accounts
    (1,210 )     560       308       509       248  
Net (decrease) increase in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    (7,000 )     (63,000 )     (51,000 )     38,000       (37,000 )
Proceeds from long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    20,800       5,000       8,112       113,320       67,800  
Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    (5,101 )     (7,095 )     (16,192 )     (30,179 )     (7,169 )
Common stock repurchased
          (198 )     (198 )     (4,119 )     (7,175 )
Cancellation of shares for tax withholding
    (30 )     (34 )     (44 )            
Cash dividends paid on common stock
    (2,262 )     (1,886 )     (3,688 )     (3,691 )     (3,008 )
                                         
Net cash provided by financing activities
    26,468       21       23,898       205,310       80,223  
                                         
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    229       3,513       4,406       (9,097 )     1,617  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period
    19,307       14,901       14,901       23,998       22,381  
                                         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period
  $ 19,536     $ 18,414     $ 19,307     $ 14,901     $ 23,998  
                                         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
                                       
Cash paid during the year for:
                                       
Interest
  $ 10,990     $ 15,899     $ 29,901     $ 34,683     $ 35,304  
Income taxes
    5,001       3,300       4,401       1,751       4,501  
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
    560             4,904              
Goodwill recognition from subsidiary acquisition
    79                          
Transfer to fixed assets from subsidiary acquisition
    23                          
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


F-9


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1.   MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY REORGANIZATION AND MINORITY STOCK ISSUANCE
 
Rockville Financial, Inc., (the “Company”), a state-chartered mid-tier stock holding company was formed on December 17, 2004 to reorganize Charter Oak Community Bank Corp. from a state-chartered mutual holding company to a state-chartered two-tier mutual and stock holding company. The Reorganization and Minority Stock Issuance Plan (the “Plan”) adopted by the Company’s, Charter Oak Community Bank Corp.’s and Rockville Bank’s Boards of Directors was completed on May 20, 2005. Charter Oak Community Bank Corp.’s name was changed to Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. and 100% of the stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary Rockville Bank (the “Bank”) was exchanged for 10,689,250 shares, or 55% of the stock issued by the Company. Rockville Bank provides a full range of banking services to consumer and commercial customers through its main office in Rockville and twenty branches located in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut. The Bank’s deposits are insured under the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 
The Company sold 8,357,050 shares of its common stock, representing 43% of the outstanding common shares at $10.00 per share to eligible account holders and employee benefit plans of the Bank pursuant to subscription rights as set forth in the Plan. Reorganization costs of approximately $2.3 million were incurred in the offering and were recorded as a reduction of the proceeds from the shares sold in the reorganization.
 
For a period of five years following completion of the Plan, no person, acting singly or with an associate or group of persons acting in concert, shall directly, or indirectly, offer to acquire or acquire the beneficial ownership of more than ten percent (10%) of any class of an equity security of the Company without the prior approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner (see note 21).
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had not engaged in any business activities other than owning the common stock of Rockville Bank. Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. does not conduct any business activity other than owning a majority of the common stock of Rockville Financial, Inc. In connection with the 2005 stock offering, the Company established Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc., a non-profit charitable organization dedicated to helping the communities that the Bank serves. The Foundation was funded with a contribution of 388,700 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 2% of the outstanding common shares. The stock donation resulted in a $3.9 million contribution expense being recorded, and an additional $63,000 deferred tax benefit was recognized as the basis of the contribution for tax purposes equal to the stock’s trading price on the first day of trading, which was higher than the initial issuance price used to record the contribution expense.
 
Note 2.   BASIS OF PRESENTATION, PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
The consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented in this report include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Rockville Bank, and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, SBR Mortgage Company, SBR Investment Corp., Rockville Commercial Foreclosed Properties, Inc., Rockville Residential Foreclosed Properties, Inc., Rockville Financial Services, Inc and Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
 
Unaudited Financial Information:   Information as of June 30, 2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited. The unaudited information furnished reflects all adjustments, which consists solely of normal recurring accruals which are in the opinion of management necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at June 30, 2010 and the results of operations and cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The results of the six month periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of the Company which may be expected for the entire year.


F-10


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.
 
A description of the Company’s significant accounting policies is presented below:
 
Use of Estimates:   The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Operating results in the future could vary from the amounts derived from management’s estimates and assumptions. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, determination of pension assumptions, share-based compensation, the valuation of deferred tax assets, and the evaluation of securities for other-than-temporary impairment.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents:   For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains amounts due from banks and Federal funds sold that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from such concentrations. The Bank is required by the Federal Reserve System to maintain non-interest-bearing cash reserves equal to a percentage of certain deposits.
 
Securities:   Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the date individual investment securities are acquired, and the appropriateness of such classification is reassessed at each statement of condition date.
 
Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and recorded at amortized cost. “Trading” securities, if any, are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings. Securities not classified as held to maturity or trading, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values, are classified as “available for sale” and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no “trading” securities.
 
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the expected terms of the securities. Each reporting period, the Company evaluates all securities classified as available for sale or held to maturity, with a decline in fair value below the amortized cost of the investment to determine whether or not the impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”).
 
Marketable equity securities are evaluated for OTTI based on the severity and duration of the impairment and, if deemed to be other-than-temporary, the declines in fair value are reflected in earnings as realized losses. For debt securities, OTTI is required to be recognized (1) if the Company intends to sell the security; (2) if it is “more likely than not” that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. For all impaired debt securities that the Company intends to sell, or more likely than not will be required to sell, the full amount of the depreciation is recognized as OTTI through earnings. Credit-related OTTI for all other impaired debt securities is recognized through earnings. Non-credit related OTTI for such debt securities is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.
 
Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.
 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock:   The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank system, is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”). Based on redemption provisions of the FHLBB, the stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost.


F-11


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
At its discretion, the FHLBB may declare dividends on the stock. On January 29, 2009, the FHLBB notified its members of its focus on preserving capital in response to the ongoing market volatility. That letter outlined that actions taken by the FHLBB included an excess stock repurchase moratorium, and increased retained earnings target, and suspension of its quarterly dividend payment. There can be no guarantee of future dividends. The Bank reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis in the FHLBB stock. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, no impairment has been recognized.
 
Loans:   Loans are stated at current unpaid principal balances, net of the allowance for loan losses, charge-offs, deferred loan origination costs and fees and loan purchase premiums. Commitment fees for which the likelihood of exercise is remote are recognized over the loan commitment period on a straight-line basis.
 
A loan is classified as a trouble debt restructure (“TDR”) when certain concessions have been made to the original contractual terms, such as reductions of interest rates or deferral of interest or principal payments due to the borrowers’ financial condition.
 
A loan is impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
 
An impaired loan is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Management considers all non-accrual loans and TDR’s to be impaired.
 
In most cases, loan payments less than 90 days past due, based on contractual terms, are considered minor collection delays, and the related loans are generally not considered impaired. The Company considers consumer installment loans to be pools of smaller balance, homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, unless such loans are subject to a trouble debt restructuring agreement.
 
Interest and Fees on Loans:   Interest on loans is accrued and included in interest income based on contractual rates applied to principal amounts outstanding. Accrual of interest is discontinued, and previously accrued income is reversed, when loan payments are 90 days or more past due or when, in the judgment of management, collectibility of the loan or loan interest becomes uncertain.
 
Subsequent recognition of income occurs only to the extent payment is received subject to management’s assessment of the collectibility of the remaining interest and principal. A non-accrual loan is restored to accrual status when it is no longer 90 days delinquent and collectibility of interest and principal is no longer in doubt.
 
Loan origination fees and direct loan origination costs (including loan commitment fees) are deferred, and the net amount is recognized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield utilizing the interest method over the contractual life of the loan.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses:   The allowance for loan losses is established as embedded losses are estimated to have occurred through the provisions for losses charged against operations and is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to absorb losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment in determining the adequacy of the allowance is inherently subjective and is based on past loan loss experience, known and inherent losses and size of the loan portfolios, an assessment of current economic and real estate market conditions, estimates of the current value of underlying collateral, review of regulatory authority examination reports and other relevant factors. An allowance is maintained for impaired loans to reflect the difference, if any, between the carrying value of the loan and the present value of the projected cash flows, observable fair value or collateral value. Loans are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the uncollectibility of principal is confirmed. Any subsequent recoveries are credited


F-12


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
to the allowance for loan losses when received. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties, when considered necessary.
 
The majority of the Company’s loans are collateralized by real estate located in central and eastern Connecticut in addition to a portion of the commercial real estate loan portfolio located in the Northeast region of the United States. Accordingly, the collateral value of a substantial portion of the Company’s loan portfolio and real estate acquired through foreclosure is susceptible to changes in market conditions in these areas.
 
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance or charge-offs may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions, particularly in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies have the authority to require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance or charge-offs based on the agencies’ judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
 
Derivative Loan Commitments:   Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. Loan commitments that are derivatives are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet in other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in other non-interest income, if material. Fair value is based on changes in the fair value of the underlying mortgage loans.
 
Forward Loan Sale Commitments:   To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan commitments, the Company utilizes both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loans that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments. Mandatory delivery contracts are accounted for as derivative instruments. Mandatory delivery forward loan sale commitments are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet in other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in other non-interest income. Subsequent to inception, changes in the fair value of the loan commitment are recognized based on changes in the fair value of the underlying mortgage loan due to interest rate changes, changes in the probability the derivative loan commitment will be exercised, and the passage of time. In estimating fair value, the Company assigns a probability to a loan commitment based on an expectation that it will be exercised and the loan will be funded.
 
The Company estimates the fair value of its forward loan sales commitments using a methodology similar to that used for derivative loan commitments. Forward loan sale commitments are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet in other assets and other liabilities with changes in fair value recorded in other non-interest income, if material.
 
Other Real Estate Owned:   Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value, less cost to sell, at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations, changes in the valuation allowance and any direct writedowns are included in other non-interest expense.
 
Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Commitments:   The reserve for off-balance sheet commitments is a component of other liabilities and represents the estimate for probable credit losses inherent in unfunded commitments to extend credit. Unfunded commitments to extend credit include unfunded commercial and residential lines of credit, unfunded commercial and residential construction commitments, standby and commercial letters of credit. The process used to determine the reserve for off-balance sheet commitments is consistent with the process for determining the allowance for loan losses.


F-13


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Bank-Owned Life Insurance:   The cash surrender value of Bank-Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”), net of any deferred acquisition and surrender costs or loans is recorded as an asset. Changes in the net cash surrender value of policies, as well as insurance proceeds received, are reflected in non-interest income on the consolidated statement of operations and are not subject to income taxes. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no deferred acquisition costs, surrender costs or loans. There are no restrictions on the use of any insurance proceeds the Company receives from BOLI.
 
Transfers of Financial Assets:   Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when: (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and no condition both constrains the transferee from taking advantage of that right and provides more than a trivial benefit for the transferor, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through either: (a) an agreement that both entitles and obligates the transferor to repurchase or redeem the assets before maturity or (b) the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets, other than through a cleanup call.
 
Premises and Equipment:   Premises and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets which range from three to 40 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the improvements’ estimated economic lives or the related lease terms excluding lease extension periods. Gains and losses on dispositions are recognized upon realization. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized.
 
Advertising Costs:   Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:   Long-lived assets that are held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If impairment is indicated by that review, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value through a charge to non-interest expense. No write-downs of long-lived assets were recorded for any period presented herein.
 
Goodwill:   In connection with a branch acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill, which represents the excess of the fair value of deposit liabilities assumed over the assets received. Goodwill is not amortized and is evaluated for impairment annually. No impairment was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited), and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
 
Income Taxes:   The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through future earnings and future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences.
 
The Company has not provided for Connecticut state income taxes since December 31, 1998 because it has created and maintained a “passive investment company” (“PIC”), as permitted by Connecticut law. The Company believes it is in compliance with the state PIC requirements and that no state taxes are due from December 31, 1998 through December 31, 2009; however, the Company has not been audited by the


F-14


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Department of Revenue Services for such periods. If the state were to determine that the PIC was not in compliance with statutory requirements, a material amount of taxes could be due.
 
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits:   The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits for full-time employees hired before January 1, 2005, meeting certain requirements as to age and length of service. The benefits are based on years of service and average compensation, as defined. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute an amount needed to meet the minimum funding standards established by the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The compensation cost of an employee’s pension benefit is recognized on the projected unit cost method over the employee’s approximate service period.
 
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees hired prior to March 1, 1993. Participants become eligible for the benefits if they retire after reaching age 62 with five or more years of service. Benefits are paid in fixed amounts depending on length of service at retirement. The Company accrues for the estimated costs of these benefits through charges to expense during the years that employees render service; however, the Company does not fund this plan.
 
Treasury Stock:   Shares of common stock that are repurchased are recorded in treasury stock at cost. On the date of subsequent re-issuance, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock on a first-in, first-out basis. Treasury shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.
 
Service Charges and Fee Income:   Service charges and fee income which are not deferred are recorded on an accrual basis when earned.
 
Fair Values of Financial Instruments:   The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
 
Cash and Due from Banks, Short-Term Investments, Accrued Interest Receivable and Mortgagors’ and Investors’ Escrow Accounts — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
 
Securities — Fair values, excluding FHLBB stock, are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities and pricing models that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data. The carrying value of FHLBB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the FHLBB.
 
Loans Receivable — The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities as of the measurement date. Fair value for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or collateral values, where applicable.
 
Deposits — The fair value of demand, NOW, savings and money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market interest rates being offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities on such deposits.
 
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston — The fair value of the advances is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current FHLBB interest rates for advances of similar maturity to a schedule of remaining maturities of such advances.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments — Fair values for off-balance sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standings.


F-15


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Earnings per Common Share:   Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. If rights to dividends on unvested options/awards are non-forfeitable, these unvested options/awards are considered outstanding in the computation of basic earnings per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2009, as a result of new accounting guidance, the Company included unvested restricted stock in the calculation of basic earnings per share. No adjustment has been made to 2008 and 2007 earnings per share as the effect was immaterial. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity.
 
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares are not considered outstanding for calculating basic and diluted earnings per common share. ESOP shares committed to be released are considered to be outstanding for purposes of the earnings per share computation. ESOP shares that have not been legally released, but that relate to employee services rendered during an accounting period (interim or annual) ending before the related debt service payment is made, is considered committed to be released.
 
ESOP Expenses:   Unearned ESOP shares are shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity and presented as unearned compensation — ESOP. During the period the ESOP shares are committed to be released, the Company recognizes compensation cost equal to the average fair value of the ESOP shares. When the shares are released, unearned common shares held by the ESOP are reduced by the cost of the ESOP shares released and the differential between the fair value and the cost is charged to additional paid-in capital. The loan receivable from the ESOP to the Company is not reported as an asset nor is the debt of the ESOP reported as a liability in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Share-Based Compensation:   The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. These costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted. When determining the estimated fair value of stock options granted, the Company utilizes various assumptions regarding the expected volatility of the stock price, estimated forfeitures using historical data on employee terminations, the risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option, and the expected dividend yield that the Company expects over the expected life of the options granted. Reductions in compensation expense associated with forfeited options are estimated at the date of grant, and this estimated forfeiture rate is adjusted monthly based on actual forfeiture experience. The Company measures the fair value of the restricted stock using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company expenses the grant date fair value of the Company’s stock options and restricted stock with a corresponding increase in equity.
 
Segment Information:   As a community oriented financial institution, substantially all of the Company’s operations involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers. Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of these community-banking operations, which constitutes the Company’s only operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
 
Note 3.   RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
Receivables, Topic 310:   In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The objective of this Update is for an entity to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (1) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables (2) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses.


F-16


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
For public entities, the disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010 and the disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010, and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, Topic 820:   In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No 2010-06 which provides guidance that requires more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. This guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2010, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Transfers of Financial Assets, Topic 860:   In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16 which requires entities to provide more information about sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the seller retains some risk in the assets. The guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for the derecognition of financial assets, and enhances the disclosure requirements for sellers of the assets. This guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2010 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Note 4.   EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
The following tables sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:
 
                                         
    Six Months Ended
                   
    June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                    
(In thousands)  
 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328  
                                         
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding
    18,519       18,451       18,469       18,428       18,751  
Effect of dilutive options
    12             5              
                                         
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share
    18,531       18,451       18,474       18,428       18,751  
                                         
 
Treasury shares and unallocated common shares held by the ESOP are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for either basic or diluted earnings per share calculations. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2009, unvested restricted shares were included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, unvested restricted shares are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share. The number of shares of restricted stock issued that were included in the calculations was 128,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited), 129,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and 129,000 as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s common stock equivalents relate solely to stock options issued and outstanding and unvested restricted stock awards. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2009, options to purchase 434,300 shares, 445,875 shares and 445,875 shares, respectively, of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $9.24 to $17.77 were not considered in the computation of potential common shares for the purpose of diluted EPS as the shares were anti-dilutive based on the Company’s average market price during the periods. At December 31, 2008, options to purchase 342,125 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from


F-17


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
$11.98 to $17.77 were not considered in the computation of potential common shares for the purpose of diluted EPS, since the shares were antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss for the period. At December 31, 2007, options to purchase 213,500 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $14.35 to $17.77 were not considered in the computation of potential common shares for the purpose of diluted EPS, since the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the stock for the period and the effect of inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
 
Note 5.   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
 
The Company groups its assets and liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
 
Level 1:   Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The quoted price is not adjusted because of the size of the position relative to trading volume.
 
Level 2:   Pricing inputs are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly but are not the same as those used in Level 1. Fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.
 
Level 3:   Pricing inputs are unobservable for the assets and liabilities and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity and the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.
 
The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such instances, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given asset or liability is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value of the asset or liability.
 
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
 
The following valuation methodologies are used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
Available for Sale Securities :    Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models. Level 1 securities are those traded on active markets for identical securities including U.S. treasury debt securities, equity securities and mutual funds. Level 2 securities include U.S. government agency obligations, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities, corporate and other debt securities. Level 3 securities include private placement securities and thinly traded equity securities.
 
Other Liabilities :   The Company records deferred director compensation and supplemental savings and retirement plans at fair value based upon Level 1 quoted market prices.


F-18


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
 
                                 
          Quoted
             
          Prices in
             
          Active
             
          Markets for
    Other
    Significant
 
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
    Total
    Assets
    Inputs
    Inputs
 
    Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
    (In thousands)  
 
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
                               
Available for Sale Securities:
                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 29,150     $ 2,009     $ 27,141     $  
Residential mortgage-backed securities
    65,500             65,500        
Corporate debt securities
    4,720             4,720        
Other debt securities
    254             254        
Marketable equity securities
    14,423       14,350             73  
                                 
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 114,047     $ 16,359     $ 97,615     $ 73  
                                 
 
                                 
          Quoted
             
          Prices in
             
          Active
             
          Markets for
    Other
    Significant
 
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
    Total
    Assets
    Inputs
    Inputs
 
    Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2009
                               
Available for Sale Securities:
                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 7,052     $ 2,018     $ 5,034     $  
Residential mortgage-backed securities
    75,967             75,967        
Corporate debt securities
    4,656             4,656        
Other debt securities
    731             731        
Marketable equity securities
    14,345       14,272             73  
                                 
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 102,751     $ 16,290     $ 86,388     $ 73  
                                 
 
                                 
          Quoted
             
          Prices in
             
          Active
             
          Markets for
    Other
    Significant
 
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
    Total
    Assets
    Inputs
    Inputs
 
    Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2008
                               
Available for Sale Securities:
  $ 141,250     $ 14,958     $ 124,178     $ 2,114  
                                 
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value
  $ 141,250     $ 14,958     $ 124,178     $ 2,114  
                                 
Other Liabilities
  $ 338     $ 338     $     $  
                                 
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
  $ 338     $ 338     $     $  
                                 


F-19


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
There were no significant transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited). During the first six months of 2010 (unaudited), the Company purchased $22.0 million of U.S. government agency securities and received $11.2 million of principal payments of residential mortgage-backed securities which are Level 2 assets (unaudited).
 
The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following table for the periods indicated:
 
         
    Assets  
    Securities
 
    Available
 
    for Sale  
    (In thousands)  
 
Balance as of December 31, 2007
  $ 308  
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
       
Included in earnings-realized
     
Included in earnings-unrealized
    (1,073 )
Included in other comprehensive income
    446  
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net
    (7 )
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
    2,440  
         
Balance as of December 31, 2008
    2,114  
         
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
       
Included in earnings-realized
     
Included in earnings-unrealized
     
Included in other comprehensive income
    43  
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net
     
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
    (2,084 )
         
Balance as of December 31, 2009
    73  
         
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) (unaudited):
       
Included in earnings-realized
       
Included in earnings-unrealized
     
Included in other comprehensive income
     
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net
     
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (unaudited)
     
         
Balance as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
  $ 73  
         
Change in unrealized losses relating to instruments still held at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
     
Change in unrealized losses relating to instruments still held at December 31, 2009
    43  
Change in unrealized losses relating to instruments still held at December 31, 2008
    1,073  
 
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis:
 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for certain assets that are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. There were no liabilities recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
 
The Company may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.


F-20


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Other Real Estate Owned :   The Company classifies property acquired through foreclosure or acceptance of deed-in-lieu of foreclosure as other real estate owned in its financial statements. Upon foreclosure, the property securing the loan is written down to fair value as determined by real estate appraisals less the estimated selling expense. Appraisals are based upon observable market data such as comparable sales within the real estate market; however, assumptions made are based on management’s judgment of the appraisals and current real estate market conditions and therefore these assets are classified as non-recurring Level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy.
 
Impaired Loans :   Accounting standards require that a creditor recognize the impairment of a loan if the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate (or, alternatively, the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral) is less than the recorded investment in the impaired loan. Non-recurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent loans are recorded, when necessary, to reflect partial write-downs based upon observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral. The Company records impaired loans as non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements.
 
                                         
          Quoted
                   
          Prices in
                   
          Active
                   
          Markets for
    Other
    Significant
       
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
       
          Assets
    Inputs
    Inputs
    Total Gains/
 
    Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     (Losses)  
    (In thousands)  
 
At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                                       
                                         
Other real estate owned
  $ 2,953     $     $     $ 2,953     $  
Impaired loans
    7,067                   7,067        
                                         
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 10,020     $     $     $ 10,020     $  
                                         
 
                                         
          Quoted
                   
          Prices in
                   
          Active
                   
          Markets for
    Other
    Significant
       
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
       
          Assets
    Inputs
    Inputs
    Total Gains/
 
    Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     (Losses)  
    (In thousands)  
 
At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
                                       
                                         
Impaired loans
  $ 5,473     $     $     $ 5,473     $ (381 )
                                         
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 5,473     $     $     $ 5,473     $ (381 )
                                         
 
                                     
          Quoted
                 
          Prices in
                 
          Active
                 
          Markets for
    Other
    Significant
     
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
     
          Assets
    Inputs
    Inputs
     
    Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)      
    (In thousands)      
 
At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
                                   
                                     
Impaired loans
  $ 9,962     $     $     $ 9,962      
                                     
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 9,962     $     $     $ 9,962      
                                     


F-21


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are exempt from disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented herein may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
 
                                                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2010   2009   2008
    Carrying
  Fair
  Carrying
  Fair
  Carrying
  Fair
    Amount   Value   Amount   Value   Amount   Value
    (Unaudited)                
 
(In thousands)
                                               
Financial assets:
                                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 19,536     $ 19,536     $ 19,307     $ 19,307     $ 14,901     $ 14,901  
Available for sale securities
    114,047       114,047       102,751       102,751       141,250       141,250  
Held to maturity securities
    16,747       18,066       19,074       20,011       24,138       25,069  
Loans receivable-net
    1,383,036       1,393,817       1,361,019       1,360,789       1,291,791       1,286,887  
FHLBB stock
    17,007       17,007       17,007       17,007       17,007       17,007  
Accrued interest receivable
    4,553       4,553       4,287       4,287       4,636       4,636  
                                                 
Financial liabilities:
                                               
Regular savings
    159,704       159,704       143,601       143,601       121,527       121,527  
Money market and investment savings
    240,194       240,194       234,737       234,737       188,110       188,110  
Demand and NOW
    269,168       269,168       258,583       258,583       203,056       203,056  
Club accounts
    834       834       247       247       227       227  
Time deposits
    480,479       487,562       491,940       498,647       529,588       538,262  
Mortgagors’ and investors’ escrow accounts
    5,175       5,175       6,385       6,385       6,077       6,077  
Advances from the FHLBB
    272,501       289,527       263,802       276,619       322,882       335,043  
 
Note 6.   RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
 
The Company is required to maintain a percentage of transaction account balances on deposit in non-interest-earning reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank that was offset by the Company’s average vault cash. At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company was required to have cash and liquid assets of approximately $3.0 million, $3.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, to meet these requirements. The Company maintains a compensating balance of $600,000 to partially offset service fees charged by the Federal Reserve Bank.


F-22


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Note 7.   INVESTMENT SECURITIES
 
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values of available for sale investment securities are as follows:
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
    Amortized
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                               
Available for sale:
                               
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 29,002     $ 148     $     $ 29,150  
Government-sponsored residential mortgage- backed securities
    61,348       4,153       1       65,500  
Corporate debt securities
    5,881             1,161       4,720  
Other debt securities
    250       4             254  
                                 
Total debt securities
    96,481       4,305       1,162       99,624  
                                 
Marketable equity securities, by sector:
                               
Banks
    1,256       2,496       9       3,743  
Consumer and household products
    1,134       18       56       1,096  
Food and beverage service
    1,151       166       83       1,234  
Government-sponsored enterprises
    283       6       125       164  
Healthcare/pharmaceutical
    387             80       307  
Industrial
    695       129       53       771  
Integrated utilities
    742       20       4       758  
Other industries
    1,030       234       44       1,220  
Mutual funds
    2,644       116             2,760  
Oil and gas
    754       460       23       1,191  
Technology/Semiconductor
    228       44             272  
Telecommunications
    661       35       74       622  
Transportation
    294       15       24       285  
                                 
Total marketable equity securities
    11,259       3,739       575       14,423  
                                 
Total securities available for sale
  $ 107,740     $ 8,044     $ 1,737     $ 114,047  
                                 


F-23


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
At June 30, 2010 (unaudited), the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale of $6.3 million, net of income taxes of $2.2 million, or $4.1 million, is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
    Amortized
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                               
Held to maturity:
                               
Government-sponsored residential mortgage- backed securities
  $ 16,747     $ 1,319     $     $ 18,066  
                                 
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
    Amortized
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2009
                               
Available for sale:
                               
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 7,017     $ 36     $ 1     $ 7,052  
Government-sponsored residential mortgage- backed securities
    72,537       3,431       1       75,967  
Corporate debt securities
    5,879             1,223       4,656  
Other debt securities
    722       9             731  
                                 
Total debt securities
    86,155     $ 3,476       1,225       88,406  
                                 
Marketable equity securities, by sector:
                               
Banks
    1,256       2,470       173       3,553  
Consumer and household products
    839       40       17       862  
Food and beverage service
    948       158       41       1,065  
Government-sponsored enterprises
    284       217             501  
Healthcare/pharmaceutical
    387       3       19       371  
Industrial
    639       134       13       760  
Integrated utilities
    742       69             811  
Other industries
    1,030       263       6       1,287  
Mutual funds
    2,621       62             2,683  
Oil and gas
    754       353       12       1,095  
Technology/Semiconductor
    342       173             515  
Telecommunications
    354             15       339  
Transportation
    313       190             503  
                                 
Total marketable equity securities
    10,509       4,132       296       14,345  
                                 
Total securities available for sale
  $ 96,664     $ 7,608     $ 1,521     $ 102,751  
                                 


F-24


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
At December 31, 2009, the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale of $6.1 million, net of income taxes of $2.1 million, or $4.0 million, is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
    Amortized
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2009
                               
Held to maturity:
                               
Government-sponsored residential mortgage- backed securities
  $ 19,074     $ 937     $     $ 20,011  
                                 
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
    Amortized
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2008
                               
Available for sale:
                               
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  $ 2,031     $ 17     $     $ 2,048  
Mortgage-backed securities
    117,517       3,222       344       120,395  
Corporate debt securities
    4,831       56             4,887  
Other debt securities
    725       14             739  
                                 
Total debt securities
    125,104       3,309       344       128,069  
Marketable equity securities
    10,437       3,011       508       12,940  
Other equity securities
    241                   241  
                                 
Total securities available for sale
  $ 135,782     $ 6,320     $ 852     $ 141,250  
                                 
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
    Amortized
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
December 31, 2008
                               
Held to maturity:
                               
Government-sponsored residential mortgage- backed securities
  $ 24,138     $ 931     $     $ 25,069  
                                 


F-25


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 by contractual maturities are presented below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the securities may be called or repaid without any penalties. Because mortgage- backed securities require periodic principal paydowns, they are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.
 
                                 
    Available for Sale     Held to Maturity  
    Amortized
    Fair
    Amortized
    Fair
 
    Cost     Value     Cost     Value  
    (In thousands)  
 
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                               
Maturity:
                               
Within 1 year
  $ 2,107     $ 2,109     $     $  
Over 1 year to 5 years
    7,959       7,915              
Over 5 years to 10 years
    22,245       22,375              
Over 10 years
    2,822       1,725              
                                 
      35,133       34,124              
Mortgage-backed securities
    61,348       65,500       16,747       18,066  
                                 
Total debt securities
  $ 96,481     $ 99,624     $ 16,747     $ 18,066  
                                 
December 31, 2009
                               
Maturity:
                               
Within 1 year
  $ 2,019     $ 2,018     $     $  
Over 1 year to 5 years
    8,050       8,006              
Over 5 years to 10 years
    722       731              
Over 10 years
    2,827       1,684              
                                 
      13,618       12,439              
Mortgage-backed securities
    72,537       75,967       19,074       20,011  
                                 
Total debt securities
  $ 86,155     $ 88,406     $ 19,074     $ 20,011  
                                 
 
At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, securities with a fair value of $2.0 million were pledged to secure public deposits and U.S. Treasury tax and loan payments.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited), gross gains of $188,000 and $936,000, respectively, were realized on the sale of available for sale securities. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, gross gains of $936,000, $689,000 and $754,000, respectively, were realized on the sale of available for sale securities. Gross losses realized on the sale of available for sale securities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2009 were negligible and were $308,000 and $246,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
For the period ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not own any investment or mortgage-backed securities of a single issuer, other than securities guaranteed by the U.S. Government or government-sponsored enterprises, which had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity.


F-26


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
The following table summarizes gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the investments have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, for the periods indicated:
 
                                                 
    Less than Twelve Months     Over Twelve Months     Total  
          Gross
          Gross
             
    Fair
    Unrealized
    Fair
    Unrealized
    Fair
    Unrealized
 
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
 
June 30, 2010 (unaudited):
                                               
Available for Sale:
                                               
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities
  $     $     $ 39     $ 1     $ 39     $ 1  
Corporate debt
                4,620       1,161       4,620       1,161  
                                                 
Total debt securities
                4,659       1,162       4,659       1,162  
Marketable equity securities
    2,502       404       707       171       3,209       575  
                                                 
Total
  $ 2,502     $ 404     $ 5,366     $ 1,333     $ 7,868     $ 1,737  
                                                 
December 31, 2009:
                                               
Available for Sale:
                                               
U.S. Government and government- sponsored enterprises
  $ 2,018     $ 1     $     $     $ 2,018     $ 1  
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities
                58       1       58       1  
Corporate debt
                4,556       1,223       4,556       1,223  
                                                 
Total debt securities
    2,018       1       4,614       1,224       6,632       1,225  
Marketable equity securities
    1,097       184       1,099       112       2,196       296  
                                                 
Total
  $ 3,115     $ 185     $ 5,713     $ 1,336     $ 8,828     $ 1,521  
                                                 
December 31, 2008:
                                               
Available for Sale:
                                               
Residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 13,188     $ 331     $ 368     $ 13     $ 13,556     $ 344  
                                                 
Total debt securities
    13,188       331       368       13       13,556       344  
Marketable equity securities
    4,135       460       44       48       4,179       508  
                                                 
Total
  $ 17,323     $ 791     $ 412     $ 61     $ 17,735     $ 852  
                                                 
 
There were no held to maturity securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 or 2008.
 
Of the securities summarized above as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited), 25 issues have unrealized losses for less than twelve months and 9 issues had unrealized losses for twelve months or more. As of December 31, 2009, 9 issues had unrealized losses for less than twelve months and 13 issues had losses for twelve months or more.
 
As of December 31, 2008, fifty issues had unrealized losses for less than twelve months and seven issues had losses for twelve months or more.


F-27


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
U.S. Government and government-sponsored enterprises and Mortgage-backed securities.   The unrealized losses on the Company’s U.S. Government and government-sponsored securities were caused by increases in the rate spread to comparable treasury securities. The Company does not expect these securities to settle at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before the recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009.
 
Corporate Debt Securities.   The unrealized losses on corporate debt securities relate to one AA+ rated corporate bond and one pooled trust preferred security. The unrealized loss on the corporate bond was caused by the low interest rate environment because it floats quarterly to three month LIBOR. The unrealized loss on the Preferred Term Security XXVIII, Ltd. (PRETSL XXVIII) investment was caused by the low interest rate environment because it floats quarterly to three month LIBOR. No loss of principal or break in yield is projected. Based on the existing credit profile, management does not believe that these investments will suffer from any credit related losses. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009.
 
Marketable Equity Securities.   The Company’s investments in marketable equity securities consist of common stock, preferred stock and mutual funds. The unrealized losses are spread out among several industries with no concentration in any one security. Management evaluated the near-term prospects of the issuers and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value. The Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited), the Company recorded no other-than-temporary impairment charges. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 (unaudited), the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $357,000. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $65,000 related to one mutual fund. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the security as of the date of impairment. The Company’s remaining investment in this mutual fund was $1.4 million with a $55,000 unrealized gain at December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $297,000 related to five common stock securities. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing prices of the securities as of the dates of impairment. The Company’s remaining investment in these five common stock securities was $648,000 with a net $133,000 unrealized loss at December 31, 2009.
 
The Company will continue to review its entire portfolio for other-than-temporarily impaired securities with additional attention being given to high risk securities such as the one pooled trust preferred security that the Company owns.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $11.6 million related to the preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as a result of actions taken in the third quarter of 2008 to place those agencies into conservatorship. The Company’s remaining investment in these securities was $283,000 with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.1 million related to one AAA rated pooled trust preferred security. The charge for the impairment was based on a Level 3 price for the pooled trust preferred security as of the date of the impairment. The Company’s remaining investment in this pooled trust preferred security was $1.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $587,000 related to one mutual fund. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the


F-28


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
security as of the date of the impairment. The Company’s remaining investment in this mutual fund was $1.7 million with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $493,000 related to one AAA rated corporate debt security. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing price of the security as of the date of the impairment. The Company’s remaining investment in this corporate debt security was $2.4 million with no unrealized gain or loss at December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.1 million related to eleven common stock securities. The charge for the impairment was computed using the closing prices of the securities as of the date of the impairment. The Company’s remaining investment in these eleven common stock securities was $1.7 million with no unrealized gain of loss at December 31, 2008.
 
Note 8.   LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
 
A summary of the Company’s loan portfolio is as follows:
 
                         
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)              
(In thousands)        
 
Real estate loans:
                       
Residential
  $ 747,421     $ 754,838     $ 746,041  
Commercial
    449,534       426,028       351,474  
Construction
    63,778       71,078       89,099  
                         
Total real estate loans
    1,260,733       1,251,944       1,186,614  
Commercial business loans
    127,758       113,240       106,684  
Installment loans
    5,036       5,783       7,704  
Collateral loans
    2,022       1,959       1,925  
                         
Total loans
    1,395,549       1,372,926       1,302,927  
Net deferred loan costs and premiums
    631       632       1,417  
Allowance for loan losses
    (13,144 )     (12,539 )     (12,553 )
                         
Loans — net
  $ 1,383,036     $ 1,361,019     $ 1,291,791  
                         
 
At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) the unpaid principal balance of loans placed on non-accrual status was $14.4 million. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the unpaid principal balances of loans placed on non-accrual status was $12.0 million and $10.1 million, respectively. If non-accrual loans had been performing in accordance with their original terms, the Company would have recorded $964,000, $554,000, $233,000, $237,000 and $53,000 in additional interest income during the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Company policy requires six months of continuous payments in order for the loan to be removed from non-accrual status. At June 30, 2010, (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no loans contractually past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest.


F-29


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
The following information relates to impaired loans for the periods indicated:
 
                                         
    At or for the Six Months Ended
       
    June 30,     At or for the Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                    
(In thousands)        
 
Recorded investment in impaired loans for which there is a related allowance for loan losses
  $ 2,944     $ 4,091     $ 5,854     $ 2,840     $ 489  
Recorded investment in impaired loans for which there is no related allowance for loan losses
    11,422       10,500       6,192       7,595       1,080  
                                         
Total impaired loans
  $ 14,366     $ 14,591     $ 12,046     $ 10,435     $ 1,569  
                                         
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans
  $ 669     $ 982     $ 381     $ 473     $ 155  
Average recorded investment in impaired loans
  $ 14,471     $ 14,392     $ 13,356     $ 5,358     $ 1,493  
Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis
  $ 114     $ 85     $ 250     $ 508     $ 52  
 
The Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans are impaired.
 
The Company’s lending activities are conducted principally in Connecticut. The Company grants single-family and multi-family residential loans, commercial loans and a variety of consumer loans. In addition, the Company grants loans for the construction of residential homes, residential developments and land development projects. The ultimate repayment of these loans is dependent on the local economy and real estate market.
 
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
 
                                         
    For the Six Months
    For the Years Ended
 
    Ended June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                    
(In thousands)        
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 12,539     $ 12,553     $ 12,553     $ 10,620     $ 9,827  
Provision for loan losses
    1,812       603       1,961       2,393       749  
Loans charged-off
    (1,219 )     (222 )     (2,113 )     (621 )     (173 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
    12       126       138       161       217  
                                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 13,144     $ 13,060     $ 12,539     $ 12,553     $ 10,620  
                                         


F-30


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
In the normal course of business, the Company grants loans to executive officers, Directors and other related parties. Changes in loans outstanding to such related parties are as follows:
 
                         
    For the Six
             
    Months
             
    Ended
    For the Years Ended
 
    June 30,
    December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)              
(In thousands)        
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 3,719     $ 4,050     $ 3,808  
Loans to related parties who terminated service during the period
          (261 )      
Addition of related parties during the period
    96              
Additional loans and advances
    285       868       3,026  
Repayments
    (427 )     (938 )     (2,784 )
                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 3,673     $ 3,719     $ 4,050  
                         
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, all related party loans were performing.
 
Related party loans were made on the same terms as those for comparable loans and transactions with unrelated parties, other than certain mortgage loans which were made to employees with over one year of service with the Company which have rates 0.50% below market rates at the time of origination.
 
Loan Servicing
 
The Company services certain loans for third parties. The aggregate of loans serviced for others was $81.4 million, $57.7 million and $15.8 million as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The balances of these loans are not included in the accompanying consolidated statements of condition.
 
The risks inherent in mortgage servicing assets relate primarily to changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, the fair value of servicing rights was determined using pretax internal rates of return ranging from 8.0% to 10.0% and the Public Securities Association (“PSA”) Standard Prepayment model to estimate prepayments on the portfolio with an average prepayment speed of 457% and 239%, respectively.


F-31


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
The following summarizes mortgage servicing rights capitalized and amortized, along with the aggregate activity in related valuation allowances:
 
                 
    For the Six
       
    Months
    For the Year
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    June 30,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
    (Unaudited)        
(In thousands)        
 
Mortgage servicing rights:
               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 475     $ 68  
Additions
    202       446  
Disposals
           
Amortization
    40       39  
                 
Balance at end of period
    637       475  
                 
Valuation Allowance:
               
Balance at beginning of period
           
Additions
    61          
                 
Balance at end of period
    61        
                 
Mortgage servicing rights, net
  $ 576     $ 475  
                 
Fair value of mortgage servicing assets at end of period
  $ 576     $ 481  
                 
 
The outstanding mortgage servicing rights balances at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $68,000 and $94,000, respectively.
 
Note 9.   OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
 
At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) other real estate consisted of $2.3 million of commercial real estate properties and $720,000 of residential real estate properties which are held for sale. At December 31, 2009 other real estate owned consists of $3.0 million of commercial real estate properties and $38,000 of residential real estate properties which are held for sale. Other real estate owned expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) were $467,000 and for the year ended December 2009 were $69,000. There was no other real estate owned at or during the six month period ended June 30, 2009 (unaudited) or the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.


F-32


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Note 10.   PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
 
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
 
                                 
    June 30,
    December 31,     Estimated
 
    2010     2009     2008     Useful Lives  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)                    
 
Land and improvements
  $ 440     $ 236     $ 236       N/A  
Buildings
    15,371       15,675       15,029       39.5 years  
Furniture and equipment
    9,138       9,483       9,199       3 -10 years  
Leasehold improvements
    3,824       3,762       3,750       5 -10 years  
                                 
      28,773       29,156       28,214          
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (13,541 )     (13,293 )     (11,809 )        
                                 
    $ 15,232     $ 15,863     $ 16,405          
                                 
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) depreciation and amortization expense was $741,000 and $816,000 respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 depreciation and amortization expense was $1.6 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million respectively.
 
Note 11.   DEPOSITS
 
Deposits were as follows:
 
                         
    June 30,
    December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)              
 
Demand and NOW
  $ 269,168     $ 258,583     $ 203,056  
Regular savings
    159,704       143,601       121,527  
Money market and investment savings
    240,194       234,737       188,110  
Club accounts
    834       247       227  
Time deposits
    480,479       491,940       529,588  
                         
    $ 1,150,379     $ 1,129,108     $ 1,042,508  
                         
 
Time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more were $168.8 million, $168.5 and $172.0 million as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Contractual maturities of time deposits are summarized below:
 
                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)        
 
2010
  $ 205,538     $ 359,757  
2011
    164,712       85,916  
2012
    48,127       19,836  
2013
    21,546       13,852  
2014
    11,052       10,978  
Thereafter
    29,504       1,601  
                 
    $ 480,479     $ 491,940  
                 
 
Deposit accounts of officers, Directors, and other related parties aggregated $3.7 million at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and $3.3 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


F-33


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
A summary of interest expense by account type is as follows:
 
                                         
    For the Six Months
    For the Years Ended
 
    Ended June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)                    
 
Non-time deposits
  $ 1,028     $ 1,732     $ 3,101     $ 5,552     $ 4,158  
Time deposits
    4,825       8,900       16,270       19,517       22,923  
                                         
    $ 5,853     $ 10,632     $ 19,371     $ 25,069     $ 27,081  
                                         
 
Note 12.   FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BORROWINGS AND STOCK
 
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”). At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank had access to a pre-approved secured line of credit with the FHLBB of $10.0 million. In accordance with an agreement with the FHLBB, the qualified collateral must be free and clear of liens, pledges and encumbrances. At June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no advances outstanding under the line of credit.
 
Contractual maturities and weighted average rates of outstanding advances from the FHLBB as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 are summarized below:
 
                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
          Weighted
          Weighted
 
          Average
          Average
 
    Amount     Rate     Amount     Rate  
(Dollars in thousands)   (Unaudited)              
 
2010
  $ 28,069       3.35 %   $ 40,170       2.78 %
2011
    73,320       3.70       73,320       3.70  
2012
    37,400       4.21       37,400       4.21  
2013
    76,800       4.12       63,000       4.12  
2014
    13,112       3.70       26,912       4.13  
Thereafter
    43,800       3.53       23,000       4.12  
                                 
    $ 272,501       3.84 %   $ 263,802       3.81 %
                                 
 
At December 31, 2008, outstanding advances from the FHLBB were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                 
        December 31,
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
  2008
 
  0.38%     January 02, 2009   $ 66,000  
  3.80%     January 09, 2009     7,000  
  4.10%     July 09, 2009     7,000  
  4.18%     November 23, 2009     2,000  
  3.30%     May 27, 2010     5,000  
  4.28%     August 11, 2010     5,000  
  6.47%     September 08, 2010     362  
  4.95%     December 20, 2010     10,000  
  4.06%     December 21, 2010     5,000  
  3.57%     January 11, 2011     5,000  
  3.02%     February 15, 2011     5,000  
  3.78%     May 04, 2011     10,000  


F-34


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
                 
        December 31,
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
  2008
 
  3.95%     June 13, 2011     2,320  
  3.95%     July 07, 2011     5,000  
  3.78%     July 18, 2011     5,000  
  4.52%     August 08, 2011     5,000  
  3.65%     September 12, 2011     7,000  
  4.15%     October 03, 2011     5,000  
  3.95%     October 03, 2011     7,000  
  3.42%     November 14, 2011     5,000  
  3.42%     November 28, 2011     7,000  
  3.01%     December 05, 2011     5,000  
  4.57%     August 20, 2012     8,000  
  4.09%     September 07, 2012     7,000  
  4.60%     October 01, 2012     5,000  
  3.37%     October 03, 2012     5,400  
  4.75%     November 23, 2012     2,000  
  4.14%     December 07, 2012     10,000  
  3.85%     January 11, 2013     5,000  
  3.59%     February 01, 2013     6,000  
  4.99%     May 16, 2013     10,000  
  3.89%     May 28, 2013     5,000  
  4.75%     July 05, 2013     5,000  
  4.37%     July 08, 2013     10,000  
  4.15%     November 14, 2013     5,000  
  3.89%     November 29, 2013     7,000  
  3.37%     December 05, 2013     10,000  
  4.78%     January 13, 2014     4,400  
  3.92%     March 10. 2014     1,600  
  4.86%     March 17, 2014     7,800  
  4.18%     October 14, 2014     5,000  
  5.05%     May 18, 2015     5,000  
  3.69%     September 11, 2017     5,000  
  4.39%     November 06, 2017     8,000  
  3.19%     November 30, 2017     5,000  
                 
            $ 322,882  
                 
 
The advances are collateralized by first mortgage loans with an estimated eligible collateral value of $406.8 million, $410.3 million and $399.0 million at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLBB in an amount at least equal to the sum of 0.35% of the aggregate principal amount of its unpaid residential mortgage loans and similar obligations at the beginning of each year, or up to 4.5% of its advances (borrowings) from the FHLBB. The carrying value of FHLBB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the stock.

F-35


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Note 13.   PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS:
 
The Company sponsors a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all full-time employees hired before January 1, 2005. Participants become 100% vested after five years of employment. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute annually the maximum amount that can be deducted for Federal income tax purposes, while meeting the minimum funding standards established by the ERISA.
 
The measurement date of the pension plan assets and benefit obligations is the Company’s year-end.
 
The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) was established to provide two executive officers with a retirement benefit equal to 70% of their respective average annual earnings over the 12-month period during the last 120 months of employment producing the highest average or, if higher, the executive’s current annual earnings, which include base salary plus annual incentive compensation. The SERP benefit is offset by the executive’s benefits under the Pension Plan, the Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement and any split dollar insurance policy benefits. The Company also has supplemental retirement plans (the “Supplemental Plans”) that provide benefits for certain key executive officers. The Supplemental Plans provide restorative payments to certain executives who are prevented from receiving the full benefits contemplated by the Pension Plan, 401(k) Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Benefits under the Supplemental Plans are based on a predetermined formula. The benefits under the Supplemental Plans are reduced by other employee benefits. The liability arising from the Supplemental Plans is being accrued over the participants’ remaining periods of service so that at the expected retirement dates, the present value of the annual payments will have been expensed.
 
The Company also provides an unfunded post-retirement medical, health and life insurance benefit plan for retirees and employees hired prior to March 1, 1993.
 
The amounts related to the Pension Plan, Supplemental Plans and the SERPs are reflected in the tables that follow as “Pension Plans.”
 
The following table sets forth the plans’ change in benefit obligation, plan assets and the funded status of the pension plans and other postretirement benefits plans:
 
                                                 
    Pension Plans     Other Post-Retirement Benefits  
    Six Months
          Six Months
       
    Ended
          Ended
       
    June 30,     Years Ended December 31,     June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2010     2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)                 (Unaudited)              
(In thousands)        
 
Change in Benefit Obligation:
                                               
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
  $ 21,842     $ 20,529     $ 19,045     $ 2,189     $ 1,753     $ 1,611  
Service cost
    415       904       1,071       8       11       9  
Interest cost
    637       1,237       1,337       61       107       99  
Plan participants’ contributions
                      13       26       22  
Amendments
          118                   (1 )      
Actuarial (gain) loss
    1,533       (585 )     630       224       406       119  
Benefits paid
    (178 )     (361 )     (1,554 )     (70 )     (113 )     (107 )
                                                 
Benefit obligation at end of period
  $ 24,249     $ 21,842     $ 20,529     $ 2,425     $ 2,189     $ 1,753  
                                                 


F-36


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
                                                 
    Pension Plans     Other Post-Retirement Benefits  
    Six Months
          Six Months
       
    Ended
          Ended
       
    June 30,     Years Ended December 31,     June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008     2010     2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)                 (Unaudited)              
(In thousands)        
 
Change in Plan Assets:
                                               
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
  $ 17,385     $ 13,032     $ 14,388     $     $     $  
Actual return on plan assets
    (612 )     3,687       (4,968 )                  
Employer contributions
    913       1,027       5,166       57       88       85  
Plan participants’ contributions
                      13       25       22  
Benefits paid
    (178 )     (361 )     (1,554 )     (70 )     (113 )     (107 )
                                                 
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
  $ 17,508     $ 17,385     $ 13,032     $     $     $  
                                                 
Funded Status:
                                               
Funded status at end of period
  $ (6,741 )   $ (4,457 )   $ (7,497 )   $ (2,425 )   $ (2,189 )   $ (1,753 )
                                                 
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Condition:
                                               
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
  $ (6,741 )   $ (4,457 )   $ (7,497 )   $ (2,425 )   $ (2,189 )   $ (1,753 )
                                                 
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Consist of:
                                               
Prior service (credit) cost
  $ (98 )   $ (116 )   $ 87     $ 19     $ 28     $ 48  
Net loss
    9,617       7,022       11,199       911       716       336  
                                                 
Total accumulated other
                                               
comprehensive loss
    9,519       6,906       11,286       930       744       384  
Deferred tax asset
    (3,332 )     (2,348 )     (3,837 )     (326 )     (253 )     (131 )
                                                 
Net impact on accumulated other comprehensive loss
  $ 6,187     $ 4,558     $ 7,449     $ 604     $ 491     $ 253  
                                                 
 
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit costs and other amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the retirement plans:
 
                                                                                 
    Pension Plans              
    Six Months
          Other Post-Retirement Benefits  
    Ended June 30,     Years Ended December 31,     Six Months Ended June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007     2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                       (Unaudited)                    
(In thousands)        
 
Components of net periodic pension cost:
                                                                               
Service cost
  $ 415     $ 459     $ 904     $ 870     $ 951     $ 8     $ 6     $ 11     $ 9     $ 18  
Interest cost
    637       617       1,237       1,123       993       61       53       107       99       122  
Expected return on plan assets
    (729 )     (525 )     (1,050 )     (1,335 )     (1,052 )                              
Amortization of net actuarial losses
    279       478       956       408       485                   24       19       19  
Amortization of prior service cost
    (18 )     159       321       312       312       9       9       20       19       87  
Settlement charge
                      117             30       13                    
                                                                                 
Net periodic benefit cost
    584       1,188       2,368       1,495       1,689       108       81       162       146       246  
                                                                                 

F-37


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
                                                                                 
    Pension Plans              
    Six Months
          Other Post-Retirement Benefits  
    Ended June 30,     Years Ended December 31,     Six Months Ended June 30,     Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007     2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                       (Unaudited)                    
(In thousands)        
 
Changes in Other Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
                                                                               
Net loss (gain)
    2,875       (1,751 )     (3,221 )     7,150       (33 )     224       283       404       120       (543 )
Change in prior service cost (credit)
          118       118                         (1 )     (1 )            
Amortization of net loss
    (279 )     (478 )     (956 )     (408 )     (485 )     (9 )     (9 )     (24 )     (19 )     (19 )
Amortization of prior service cost
    18       (159 )     (321 )     (312 )     (312 )     (30 )     (13 )     (19 )     (19 )     (87 )
Adjustment for change in measurement date
                              (39 )                              
                                                                                 
Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income
    2,614       (2,270 )     (4,380 )     6,391       (830 )     185       260       360       82       (649 )
                                                                                 
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 3,198     $ (1,082 )   $ (2,012 )   $ 7,886     $ 859     $ 293     $ 341     $ 522     $ 228     $ (403 )
                                                                                 
 
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during 2010 are as follows:
 
                                 
          Other Post-
          Other Post-
 
    Pension
    Retirement
    Pension
    Retirement
 
    Plans     Benefits     Plans     Benefits  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2010     2009     2009  
    (Unaudited)              
(In thousands)        
 
Net actuarial losses
  $ 279     $ 30     $ 558     $ 60  
Prior service cost (credit)
    30       9       (37 )     18  
                                 
Net amount recognized
  $ 309     $ 39     $ 521     $ 78  
                                 
 
Assumptions
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine pension benefit obligations are as follows:
 
             
    At June 30,
  At December 31,
    2010   2009   2008
    (Unaudited)        
 
Discount rate
  5.45% / 5.00%(1)   6.00% / 5.55%(2)   6.00% / 6.40%(3)
Rate of compensation increase
  4.00%   4.00%   4.50%
 
 
(1) The discount rate was 5.45% for the Pension Plan and was 5.00% for the Supplemental and SERP plans with measurement dates of June 30, 2010 (unaudited).
 
(2) The discount rate was 6.00% for the Pension Plan and was 5.55% for the Supplemental and SERP plans with measurement dates of December 31, 2009.
 
(3) The discount rate was 6.00% for the Pension Plan and was 6.40% for the Supplemental and SERP plans with measurement dates of December 31, 2008.

F-38


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
 
In general, the Bank has selected their assumptions with respect to the expected long-term rate of return based on the prevailing yields on high quality fixed income investments increased by a premium for equity return expectations.
 
Certain disaggregated information related to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans is as follows as of their respective measurement dates:
 
                                                 
    Pension Plan   Supplemental Plans and SERPs
    June 30,
  December 31,   June 30,
  December 31,
    2010   2009   2008   2010   2009   2008
(In thousands)               (Unaudited)        
 
Projected benefit obligation
  $ 20,178     $ 17,855     $ 16,542     $ 4,072     $ 3,987     $ 3,987  
Accumulated benefit obligation
    17,097       14,835       13,283       3,814       3,750       3,621  
Fair value of plan assets
    17,508       17,385       13,032                    
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit pension expense for the periods indicated is as follows:
 
                         
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,   For the Years Ended December 31,    
    2010   2009   2009   2008   2007    
    (Unaudited)                
 
Discount rate(1)
  6.00%/5.55%   6.00%/6.40%   6.00% /6.40%   6.30%/6.20%   6.00%    
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
  8.25%   8.25%   8.25%   8.25%   8.25%    
Rate of compensation increase
  4.00%   4.50%   4.50%   4.50%   4.25%    
 
 
(1) The discount rate was 6.00% for the Pension Plan and was 5.55% for the Supplemental and SERP plans with measurement dates of June 30, 2010 (unaudited). The discount rate was 6.00% for the Pension Plan and 6.40% for the supplemental and SERP plans with measurement dates of December 31, 2009.
 
The accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation for the other post-retirement benefits was $2.4 million, $2.2 million and $1.8 million as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
The Company does not intend to apply for the government subsidy under Medicare Part-D for post-retirement prescription drug benefits. Therefore, the impact of the subsidy is not reflected in the development of the liabilities for the plan. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, prescription drug benefits are included in the post-retirement benefits offered to employees hired prior to March 1, 1993.
 
The expected long-term rate of return is based on the actual historical rates of return of published indices that are used to measure the plans’ target assets allocation. The historical rates are then discounted to consider fluctuations in the historical rates as well as potential changes in the investment environment.


F-39


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Assumed Healthcare Trend Rates
 
The Company’s accumulated post-retirement benefit obligations, exclusive of pensions, take into account certain cost-sharing provisions. The annual rate of increase in the cost of covered benefits (i.e., healthcare cost trend rate) is assumed to be 10% at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, decreasing gradually to a rate of 5% at December 31, 2014. Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare plans. A one percentage point change in the assumed healthcare cost trend rate would have the following effects (dollars in thousands):
 
                 
    1%
  1%
    Increase   Decrease
 
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation
  $ 275     $ (232 )
Effect on total service and interest
  $ 9     $ (7 )
 
Plan Assets
 
The Company’s fair value of major categories of Pension Plan assets are as follows:
 
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Fair Value  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)  
 
Asset Category
                               
Domestic equity funds
  $ 8,957     $     $     $ 8,957  
International equity funds
    1,765                   1,765  
Fixed income funds
    168                   168  
Domestic bond funds
    4,898                   4,898  
International bond funds
    869                   869  
Real estate REIT index funds
    851                   851  
                                 
Total
  $ 17,508     $     $     $ 17,508  
                                 
 
                                 
    December 31, 2009  
(In thousands)   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Fair Value  
 
Asset Category
                               
Domestic equity funds
  $ 8,997     $     $     $ 8,997  
International equity funds
    1,746                   1,746  
Fixed income funds
    187                   187  
Domestic bond funds
    4,732                   4,732  
International bond funds
    873                   873  
Real estate REIT index funds
    850                   850  
                                 
Total
  $ 17,385     $     $     $ 17,385  
                                 
 
The plan assets measured at fair value in Level 1 are based on quoted market prices in an active exchange market.
 
The Company’s investment goal is to obtain a competitive risk adjusted return on the Pension Plan assets commensurate with prudent investment practices and the plan’s responsibility to provide retirement benefits for its participants, retirees and their beneficiaries. The 2010 and 2009 targeted allocation for equity securities, debt securities and real estate is 62%, 33% and 5%, respectively. The Pension Plan’s investment policy does not explicitly designate allowable or prohibited investments; instead, it provides guidance regarding investment


F-40


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
diversification and other prudent investment practices to limit the risk of loss. The Plan’s asset allocation targets are strategic and long-term in nature and are designed to take advantage of the risk reducing impacts of asset class diversification.
 
Plan assets are periodically rebalanced to their asset class targets to reduce risk and to retain the portfolio’s strategic risk/return profile. Investments within each asset category are further diversified with regard to investment style and concentration of holdings.
 
Contributions
 
Rockville Bank contributed $900,000 to the Pension Plan in the first six months of 2010 (unaudited) and expects no additional contribution in the remaining six months of 2010 (unaudited). The Company contributed $1.0 million to the Pension Plan for the year ended December 31, 2009. In 2008, the Company contributed $1.5 million to the Pension Plan after the measurement date for the year ending December 31, 2008.
 
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
 
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
 
                 
        Other Post-
Years Ending
  Pension
  Retirement
December 31,
  Plans   Benefits
    (In thousands)
 
2010
  $ 628     $ 116  
2011
    841       124  
2012
    987       131  
2013
    1,030       140  
2014
    1,056       148  
2015-2019
    6,674       812  
 
401(k) Plan:   The Company has a tax-qualified 401(k) plan for the benefit of its eligible employees. Beginning January 1, 2005, the 401(k) Plan was amended to pay all employees, even those who do not contribute to the 401(k) Plan, an automatic 3% of pay “safe harbor” contribution that is fully vested to participants of the 401(k) Plan. For employees hired on or after January 1, 2005, a discretionary matching contribution equal to a uniform percentage of the amount of the salary reduction the employee elected to defer, which percentage will be determined each year by the Company. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited), the Company contributed $248,000 and $198,000, respectively to the plan. The Company contributed $396,000, $393,000 and $271,000 to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
Note 14.   SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
 
The Board of Directors and stockholders of the Company approved the Rockville Financial, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) in 2006. The Plan allows the Company to use stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights and performance awards to attract, retain and reward performance of qualified employees and others who contribute to the success of the Company. The Plan allowed for the issuance of a maximum of 349,830 restricted stock shares and 874,575 stock options in connection with Awards under the Plan. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, there were 31,907 restricted stock shares and 416,700 stock options that remain available for future grants under the Plan.
 
The fair value of stock option and restricted stock awards, measured at grant date, are amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company accelerates the


F-41


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
recognition of compensation costs for share-based awards granted to retirement-eligible employees and Directors and employees and Directors who become retirement-eligible prior to full vesting of the award because the Company’s incentive compensation plans allow for vesting at the time an employee or Director retires. Share-based compensation granted to non-retirement-eligible individuals is expensed over the normal vesting period.
 
Total employee and Director share-based compensation expense recognized for stock options and restricted stock was $254,000 and $827,000, with a related tax benefit recorded of $89,000 and $285,000, for the periods ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, respectively. For the periods ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, Director share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of operations as other non-interest expense) was $126,000 and $362,000 and officer share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of operations as salaries and benefits expense) was $128,000 and $476,000, respectively. The total charge of $254,000 and $838,000 includes $30,000 and $43,000 related to 2,836 and 4,537 of vested restricted shares used for income tax withholding payments on behalf of certain executives for the periods ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009. For the period ended June 30, 2009 (unaudited), Director share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of operations as other non-interest expense) was $199,000 and officer share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of operations as salaries and benefits expense) was $370,000. The total charge of $569,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes $14,000 related to 1,548 vested restricted shares used for income tax withholding payments on behalf of certain executives.
 
Total employee and Director share-based compensation expense recognized for stock options and restricted stock was $1,743,000, with a related tax benefit recorded of $593,000, for the year ended December 31, 2008 of which Director share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of operations as other non-interest expense) was $387,000 and officer share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of operations as salaries and benefits expense) was $1,356,000. The total charge of $1,743,000 includes $214,000 related to 17,762 vested restricted shares used for income tax withholding payments on behalf of certain executives.
 
Total employee and Director share-based compensation expense recognized for stock options and restricted stock was $952,000, with a related tax benefit of $324,000, for the year ended December 31, 2007 of which Director share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of income as other non-interest expense) was $341,000 and officer share-based compensation expense recognized (in the consolidated statement of income as salaries and benefits expense) was $611,000. The total charge of $952,000 includes $21,000 related to 1,556 vested restricted shares used for income tax withholding payments on behalf of certain executives.


F-42


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Stock Options:
 
The following table presents the activity related to stock options under the Plan for the periods indicated:
 
                                 
                Weighted
       
          Weighted
    Average
       
          Average
    Remaining
    Aggregate
 
    Stock
    Exercise
    Contractual
    Intrinsic
 
    Options     Price     Term     Value  
                (In years)     (In thousands)  
 
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008
    342,125     $ 14.74                  
Granted
    126,250       9.24                  
Exercised
                           
Forfeited or expired
    (22,500 )     14.70                  
                                 
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2009
    445,875     $ 13.18       8.0     $ 159  
                                 
Stock options vested and exercisable at December 31, 2009
    330,240     $ 14.04       7.6     $  
                                 
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2009
    445,875     $ 13.18       8.0     $ 159  
Granted (unaudited)
                           
Exercised (unaudited)
                           
Forfeited or expired (unaudited)
                           
                                 
Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
    445,875     $ 13.18       7.5     $ 337  
                                 
Stock options vested and exercisable at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
    363,155     $ 13.72       7.3     $  
                                 
 
The following table presents the unvested Stock Option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31:
 
                 
          Weighted Average
 
    Number of
    Grant Date
 
    Shares     Fair Value  
 
Unvested as of December 31, 2008
    86,300     $ 3.07  
Granted
    126,250       3.05  
Vested
    (86,415 )     3.05  
Forfeited, expired or canceled
    (10,500 )     3.30  
                 
Unvested as of December 31, 2009
    115,635       3.04  
Granted (unaudited)
           
Vested (unaudited)
    32,915       3.68  
Forfeited, expired or canceled (unaudited)
           
                 
Unvested as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
    82,720     $ 2.79  
                 
 
The aggregate fair value of options vested was $91,000, $264,000 and $534,000 at ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, the unrecognized cost related to the stock options awarded of $203,000 and $257,000, respectively, will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years and 2.6 years, respectively. There were no stock options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited.)


F-43


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
For share-based compensation recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the fair value of stock options granted. The weighted-average estimated fair values of stock option grants and the assumptions that were used in calculating such fair values were based on estimates at the date of grant as follows:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Weighted per share average fair value
  $ 3.05     $ 2.72     $ 4.08  
Assumptions:
                       
Risk-free interest rate
    2.23 %     3.24 %     4.60 %
Expected volatility
    39.85 %     22.11 %     19.06 %
Expected dividend yield
    2.16 %     1.67 %     0.84 %
Expected life of options granted
    6.0 years       6.0 years       6.5 years  
 
The expected volatility was determined using both the Company’s historical trading volatility as well as the historical volatility of an index published by SNL Financial for mutual holding company’s common stock over the expected average life of the options. The index was used as the Company’s stock has only been publicly traded since May 23, 2005.
 
The Company estimates option forfeitures using historical data on employee terminations.
 
The expected life of stock options granted represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding.
 
The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option is based on the average five-and seven-year U.S. Treasury Note yield curve in effect at the date of grant.
 
The expected dividend yield reflects an estimate of the dividends the Company expects to declare over the expected life of the options granted.
 
Stock options provide grantees the option to purchase shares of common stock at a specified exercise price and expire ten years from the date of grant.
 
The Company plans to use Treasury stock to satisfy future stock option exercises.


F-44


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Additional information regarding stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, is as follows:
 
                                 
Option Outstanding   Exercisable Options
        Weighted
       
Weighted
      Average
      Weighted
Average
      Remaining
      Average
Exercise
      Contractual
      Exercise
Prices
  Shares   Life   Shares   Prices
        (In years)        
 
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
                               
$ 9.24
    126,250       8.8       81,580     $ 9.24  
 11.98
    121,125       7.7       94,875       11.98  
 14.35
    78,000       7.2       66,200       14.35  
 17.77
    120,500       6.5       120,500       17.77  
December 31, 2009
                               
$ 9.24
    126,250       9.3       63,890     $ 9.24  
 11.98
    121,125       8.2       79,650       11.98  
 14.35
    78,000       7.7       66,200       14.35  
 17.77
    120,500       7.0       120,500       17.77  
 
Restricted Stock:
 
Restricted stock provides grantees with rights to shares of common stock upon completion of a service period. During the restriction period, all shares are considered outstanding and dividends are paid on the restricted stock
 
The following table presents the activity for restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2009:
 
                 
          Weighted Average
 
    Number of
    Grant Date
 
    Shares     Fair Value  
 
Unvested as of December 31, 2008
    67,580     $ 15.23  
Granted
    16,427       9.24  
Vested
    (33,112 )     14.93  
Forfeited, expired or canceled
    (9,200 )     13.57  
                 
Unvested as of December 31, 2009
    41,695     $ 13.47  
Granted (unaudited)
           
Vested (unaudited)
    (9,950 )     12.50  
Forfeited, expired or canceled (unaudited)
           
                 
Unvested as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
    31,745     $ 13.78  
                 
 
The fair value of restricted shares that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited), and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $124,000, $494,000, $1.1 million and $264,000, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of restricted stock granted during the year ended December 31, 2009 was $9.24 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $11.98. There were no restricted stock shares granted for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) or the year ended 2007.


F-45


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, there was $265,000 and $431,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years and 1.7 years, respectively.
 
Of the remaining unvested restricted stock at December 31, 2009, 23,445 shares will vest in 2010, 7,950 shares in 2011, 7,950 shares will vest in 2012 and 2,350 shares will vest in 2013. All unvested restricted stock shares are expected to vest.
 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan:   As part of the reorganization and stock offering completed in 2005, the Company established an ESOP for eligible employees of the Bank, and authorized the Company to lend the funds to the ESOP to purchase 699,659 or 3.6% of the shares issued in the initial public offering. Upon completion of the reorganization, the ESOP borrowed $4.4 million from the Company to purchase 437,287 shares of common stock. Additional shares of 59,300 and 203,072 were subsequently purchased by the ESOP in the open market at a total cost of $817,000 and $2.7 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, with additional funds borrowed from the Company. The Bank intends to make annual contributions to the ESOP that will be adequate to fund the payment of regular debt service requirements attributable to the indebtedness of the ESOP. The interest rate for the ESOP loan is the prime rate plus one percent, or 4.25% as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009. As the loan is repaid to the Company, shares will be released from collateral and will be allocated to the accounts of the participants. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, the outstanding principal and interest due was $4.5 million, and principal payments of $3.4 million have been made on the loan since inception. Dividends paid in the first six months of 2010 (unaudited) totaling $42,000 and in 2009 totaling $84,000 on unallocated ESOP shares were offset to the interest payable on the note owed by the Company.
 
As of December 31, 2009, there were 208 participants receiving an ESOP allocation with an aggregate eligible compensation of $10.9 million. This is the most recent information available as our ESOP is updated annually by a third party. The shares were allocated among the participants in proportion to each individual’s compensation as a percentage of the total aggregate compensation. Compensation was capped at $245,000 for 2009, as prescribed by law. The 2010 compensation cap is $245,000.
 
ESOP expense was $409,000 and $380,000 for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), respectively. ESOP expense was $928,000, $913,000 and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At June 30, 2010, and 2009 (unaudited), allocated ESOP shares were 337,471 and 268,196, respectively, and unallocated ESOP shares were 349,829 and 419,795, respectively. The unallocated shares had an aggregate fair value of $8.2 million and $7.5 million. December 31, 2009, there were 265,455 allocated and 419,795 unallocated ESOP shares and the unallocated shares had an aggregate fair value of $7.2 million.
 
Note 15.   INCOME TAXES
 
The components of the income tax expense (benefit) for the years periods indicated are as follows:
 
                                         
    For the Six Months
    For the Years Ended
 
    Ended June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)                    
(In thousands)        
 
Current
  $ 3,603     $ 2,723     $ 6,177     $ 4,572     $ 3,576  
Deferred
    (151 )     (518 )     (1,242 )     (5,528 )     540  
                                         
Total income tax expense (benefit)
  $ 3,452     $ 2,205     $ 4,935     $ (956 )   $ 4,116  
                                         


F-46


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:
 
                         
    June 30,
    December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)              
(In thousands)        
 
Deferred tax assets:
                       
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 4,600     $ 4,389     $ 4,268  
Investment security losses
    5,127       5,127       5,288  
Pension and post-retirement liabilities
    2,248       2,433       3,194  
Stock incentive award plan
    490       471       352  
Other
    567       606       465  
                         
Gross deferred tax assets
    13,032       13,026       13,567  
                         
Deferred tax liabilities:
                       
Unrealized gains on securities
    (2,207 )     (2,129 )     (1,859 )
Other
    (309 )     (289 )     (232 )
                         
Gross deferred tax liabilities
    (2,516 )     (2,418 )     (2,091 )
                         
Net deferred tax asset
  $ 10,516     $ 10,608     $ 11,476  
                         
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through future earnings and future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, there was no valuation allowance.
 
Retained earnings at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 includes a contingency reserve for loan losses of approximately $1.2 million, which represents the tax reserve balance existing at December 31, 1987, and is maintained in accordance with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual savings banks. Amounts transferred to the reserve have been claimed as deductions from taxable income, and, if the reserve is used for purposes other than to absorb losses on loans, a Federal income tax liability could be incurred. It is not anticipated that the Company will incur a Federal income tax liability relating to this reserve balance, and accordingly, deferred income taxes of approximately $408,000 at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 have not been recognized.
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no material uncertain tax positions related to federal and state income tax matters. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities for the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2009.


F-47


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
A reconciliation of the anticipated income tax provision (computed by applying the Federal statutory income tax rate of 34% to income before income tax expense), to the provision for income taxes as reported in the statements of operations is as follows:
 
                                         
    For the Six Months
    For the Year Ended
 
    Ended June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)                    
 
Provision for income tax at statutory rate
  $ 3,420     $ 2,350     $ 4,986     $ (865 )   $ 4,230  
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
                                       
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
    (69 )     (65 )     (126 )     (130 )     (125 )
Dividend received deduction
    (42 )     (39 )     (76 )     (234 )     (67 )
Tax exempt interest and disallowed interest expense
    (4 )     (6 )     (11 )     (16 )     (17 )
Excess book basis of Employee Stock Ownership Plan
    1       (7 )     40       42       84  
Compensation deduction limit
                      243        
Other, net
    146       (28 )     122       4       11  
                                         
Total provision for income taxes
  $ 3,452     $ 2,205     $ 4,935     $ (956 )   $ 4,116  
                                         
 
Note 16.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Leases:   The Company leases certain of its branch offices under operating lease agreements which contain renewal options for periods up to twenty years. In addition to rental payments, the branch leases require payments for executory costs. The Company also leases certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases.
 
Future minimum rental commitments under the terms of these leases, by year and in the aggregate, are as follows as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009:
 
                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    (In thousands)  
 
2010
  $ 384     $ 787  
2011
    779       772  
2012
    746       739  
2013
    725       721  
2014
    655       662  
Thereafter
    10,034       10,001  
                 
    $ 13,323     $ 13,682  
                 
 
Total rental expense charged to operations for all cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases approximated $522,000, $999,000, $983,000 and $780,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.


F-48


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
The Company, as a landlord, leases space to third party tenants under non-cancelable operating leases. In addition to base rent, the leases require payments for executory costs. Future minimum rental receivable under the non-cancelable leases are as follows as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009:
 
                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    (In thousands)  
 
2010
  $ 163     $ 327  
2011
    327       327  
2012
    318       318  
2013
    318       318  
2014
    318       318  
Thereafter
    528       528  
                 
    $ 1,972     $ 2,136  
                 
 
Rental income is recorded as a reduction to occupancy expense and amounted to $176,000 and $163,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (unaudited), respectively. Rental income was $327,000, $320,000 and $346,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
Employment and Change in Control Agreements:   In 2009 , the Bank and the Company renewed the employment agreements and change in control agreements for the executive officers and entered into employment agreements and change in control agreements with three additional officers which are effective January 1, 2010. Each employment and change in control agreement has an initial term of one year which is automatically extended on each January 1st for one additional year unless written notice is given by either party; provided, however, that no such notice by the Bank or the Company will be effective if a change of control or potential change in control has occurred prior to the date of such notice.
 
Under certain specified circumstances, the employment agreements require certain payments to be made for certain reasons other than cause, including a “change in control” as defined in the agreement. However, such employment may be terminated for cause, as defined, without incurring any continuing obligations. If the Bank chooses to terminate these employment agreements for reasons other than cause, or if the officer resigns from the Bank after specified circumstances that would constitute good reason, as defined in the employment agreement, the officer would be entitled to receive a severance benefit in the amount of three times the sum of his or her base salary and his or her potential annual incentive compensation for the year of termination or, if higher, his or her actual annual incentive compensation for the year prior to the year of termination, payable in monthly installments over the employment agreement renewal period following termination. In addition, the officer will be entitled to a pro-rata portion of the annual incentive compensation potentially payable to them for the year of termination; accelerated vesting of any outstanding stock options, restricted stock or other stock awards; immediate exercisability of any such options; and deemed satisfaction of any performance-based objectives under any stock plan or other long-term incentive award. In consideration for the compensation and benefits provided under their employment agreement, the officers are prohibited from competing with the Bank and the Company during the term of the employment agreements and for a period of two years following termination of employment for any reason.
 
Change in Control Severance Plan:   The Bank and the Company adopted a Change in Control Severance Plan to provide benefits to eligible employees upon a change in control of the Bank or the Company. Eligible employees are those with a minimum of one year of service with the Bank as of the date of the change in control. Generally, all eligible employees, other than officers who will enter into separate employment or change in control or change in control and restrictive covenant agreements with the Bank and the Company, will be eligible to participate in the plan. Under the plan, if a change in control of the Bank or the Company occurs, eligible employees who are terminated, or who terminate employment upon the occurrence of events


F-49


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
specified in the plan, within 24 months of the effective date of the change in control, will be entitled to 1/26th of the sum of the employee’s annual base salary and his or her potential annual incentive compensation for the year of termination or, if higher, his or her actual annual incentive compensation for the year prior to the year of termination, multiplied by the employee’s total years of service with the Bank. Subsidized COBRA coverage will also be made available to such employees for a period of weeks equal to the employee’s years of service with the Bank multiplied by two.
 
Legal Matters:   The Company is involved in various legal proceedings which have arisen in the normal course of business. Management believes that resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Risk:   In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and undisbursed portions of construction loans and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the statements of financial condition. The contractual amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
 
The contractual amounts of commitments to extend credit represent the amounts of potential accounting loss should the contract be fully drawn upon, the customer default and the value of any existing collateral obligations is deemed worthless. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows:
 
                         
    June 30,
    December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)              
 
Commitments to extend credit:
                       
Future loan commitments
  $ 70,849     $ 36,650     $ 48,743  
Undisbursed construction loans
    62,716       86,492       93,905  
Undisbursed home equity lines of credit
    135,237       125,511       113,725  
Undisbursed commercial lines of credit
    57,656       57,713       58,605  
Standby letters of credit
    10,679       10,555       12,231  
Unused checking overdraft lines of credit
    95       94       112  
                         
    $ 337,232     $ 317,015     $ 327,321  
                         
 
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Since these commitments could expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include residential and commercial property, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, deposits, and securities.
 
Note 17.   REGULATORY MATTERS
 
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on


F-50


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
 
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since then that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. Prompt corrective provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
 
The following is a summary of the Bank’s regulatory capital amounts on the dates indicated compared to the FDIC’s requirements for classification as a well capitalized institution and for minimum capital adequacy. Also included is a summary of Rockville Financial, Inc.’s regulatory capital and ratios as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008:
 
                                                 
                Minimum
                to Be Well
        Required
  Capitalized Under
        Minimum
  Prompt Corrective
    Actual   Ratios   Action Provisions
    Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
            (Dollars in thousands)        
 
Rockville Bank :
                                               
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets
  $ 165,854       13.2 %   $ 100,518       8.0 %   $ 125,647       10.0 %
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
    152,037       12.1       50,260       4.0       75,390       6.0  
Tier 1 capital to average assets
    152,037       9.6       63,283       4.0       79,104       5.0  
December 31, 2009
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets
  $ 158,870       13.1 %   $ 96,976       8.0 %   $ 121,220       10.0 %
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
    145,654       12.0       48,488       4.0       72,732       6.0  
Tier 1 capital to average assets
    145,654       9.3       62,478       4.0       78,097       5.0  
December 31, 2008
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets
  $ 147,898       12.8 %   $ 92,436       8.0 %   $ 115,545       10.0 %
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
    134,621       11.7       46,024       4.0       69,036       6.0  
Tier 1 capital to average assets
    134,621       8.8       61,191       4.0       76,489       5.0  
Rockville Financial, Inc :
                                               
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets
  $ 175,743       14.0 %   $ 100,496       8.0 %     N/A       N/A  
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
    161,926       12.9       50,249       4.0       N/A       N/A  
Tier 1 capital to average assets
    161,926       10.3       62,823       4.0       N/A       N/A  


F-51


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
                                                 
                Minimum
                to Be Well
        Required
  Capitalized Under
        Minimum
  Prompt Corrective
    Actual   Ratios   Action Provisions
    Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
            (Dollars in thousands)        
 
December 31, 2009
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets
  $ 170,559       14.1 %   $ 96,978       8.0 %     N/A       N/A  
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
    157,343       13.0       48,489       4.0       N/A       N/A  
Tier 1 capital to average assets
    157,343       10.1       62,028       4.0       N/A       N/A  
December 31, 2008
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets
  $ 162,068       14.2 %   $ 91,306       8.0 %   $ 114,132       10.0 %
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
    148,791       12.9       46,137       4.0       69,205       6.0  
Tier 1 capital to average assets
    148,791       10.4       57,227       4.0       71,534       5.0  
 
On October 8, 2008, Rockville Financial, Inc. made a $10.0 million capital contribution to Rockville Bank. This capital contribution has no affect on the capital amounts and ratios of Rockville Financial, Inc., but increased Rockville Bank’s capital amounts and ratios at the time of the capital contribution.
 
Connecticut law restricts the amount of dividends that the Bank can pay based on retained earnings for the current year and the preceding two years. As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, $14.5 million and $16.5 million, respectively, was available for the payment of dividends.
 
Note 18.   ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
 
Components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes, consist of the following:
 
                                 
                Cumulative
       
                Effect
       
          Unrealized
    Adjustment
       
          Gains on
    of a
    Accumulated
 
    Minimum
    Available-
    Change in
    Other
 
    Pension
    for-Sale
    Accounting
    Comprehensive
 
    Liability     Securities     Principle(1)     (Loss) Income  
          (In thousands)        
 
December 31, 2006
  $ (4,406 )   $ 2,738     $     $ (1,668 )
Change
    976       451             1,427  
                                 
December 31, 2007
    (3,430 )     3,189             (241 )
Change
    (4,272 )     420             (3,852 )
                                 
December 31, 2008
    (7,702 )     3,609             (4,093 )
Change
    2,653       1,441       (1,034 )     3,060  
                                 
December 31, 2009
    (5,049 )     5,050       (1,034 )     (1,033 )
Change
    195       83             278  
                                 
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
  $ (4,854 )   $ 5,133     $ (1,034 )   $ (755 )
                                 
 
 
(1) The effect of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 (ASC 320)

F-52


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
 
The following table summarizes other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects:
 
                                         
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,     For the Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)                    
 
Net income (loss) as reported
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328  
                                         
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
    221       791       2,184       637       684  
Income tax provision expense
    (138 )     (269 )     (743 )     (217 )     (233 )
                                         
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
    83       522       1,441       420       451  
                                         
Benefit plans amortization
    300       661       4,019       (6,474 )     1,479  
Income tax provision (expense) benefit
    (105 )     (225 )     (1,366 )     2,202       (503 )
                                         
Net benefit plans amortization
    195       436       2,653       (4,272 )     976  
                                         
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    278       958       4,094       (3,852 )     1,427  
                                         
Total comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 6,596     $ 5,468     $ 13,826     $ (5,439 )   $ 9,755  
                                         
 
Note 19.   PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
The following represents the Company’s condensed statements of condition as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008 and condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and the years ended December 31, 2009 , 2008 and 2007 which should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes:
 
Condensed Statements of Condition
 
                         
    June 30,
    December 31,  
    2010     2009     2008  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)              
 
Assets:
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 2,589     $ 5,129     $ 7,386  
Accrued interest receivable
    1       1       5  
Deferred tax asset-net
    24       23       18  
Investment in Rockville Bank
    152,495       145,739       131,604  
Due from Rockville Bank
    5,599       5,002       4,298  
Other assets
    1,828       1,724       2,634  
                         
Total Assets
  $ 162,536     $ 157,618     $ 145,945  
                         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
                       
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
  $ 152     $ 190     $ 168  
Stockholders’ equity
    162,384       157,428       145,777  
                         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 162,536     $ 157,618     $ 145,945  
                         


F-53


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Condensed Statements of Operations
 
                                         
    For the Six Months
                   
    Ended June 30,     For the Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)                    
 
Interest and dividend income:
                                       
Interest on investments
  $ 10     $ 30     $ 46     $ 224     $ 384  
                                         
Net interest income
    10       30       46       224       384  
                                         
Non-interest expenses:
                                       
General and administrative
    256       277       512       568       628  
                                         
Total non-interest expense
    256       277       512       568       628  
                                         
Loss before tax benefit and equity in undistributed net income (loss) of Rockville Bank
    (246 )     (247 )     (466 )     (344 )     (244 )
Income tax benefit
    86       83       157       116       82  
                                         
Loss before equity in undistributed net income (loss) of Rockville Bank
    (160 )     (164 )     (309 )     (228 )     (162 )
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of Rockville Bank
    6,478       4,674       10,041       (1,359 )     8,490  
                                         
Net income (loss)
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328  
                                         


F-54


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
 
                                         
    For the Six Months
                   
    Ended June 30,     For the Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2008     2007  
(In thousands)   (Unaudited)                    
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 6,318     $ 4,510     $ 9,732     $ (1,587 )   $ 8,328  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
                                       
Share-based compensation expense
    652       936       1,755       2,655       1,855  
Undistributed (income) loss of Rockville Bank
    (6,478 )     (4,674 )     (10,041 )     1,359       (8,490 )
Deferred tax (benefit) expense
    (1 )     (3 )     (5 )     289       441  
Net change in:
                                       
Accrued interest receivable
          2       4       13       7  
Due from Rockville Bank
    (597 )     (854 )     (704 )     (1,457 )     (753 )
Other assets
    (104 )     2,164       910       594       (2,525 )
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    (38 )     (32 )     22       45       124  
                                         
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (248 )     2,049       1,673       1,911       (1,013 )
                                         
Cash flows from investing activities:
                                       
Capital investment in Rockville Bank
                      (10,000 )      
                                         
Net cash used in investing activities
                      (10,000 )      
                                         
Cash flows from financing activities:
                                       
Acquisition of common stock
          (198 )     (198 )     (4,119 )     (7,175 )
Cancellation of shares for tax withholding
    (30 )     (34 )     (44 )            
Cash dividends paid on common stock
    (2,262 )     (1,886 )     (3,688 )     (3,691 )     (3,008 )
                                         
Net cash used in financing activities
    (2,292 )     (2,118 )     (3,930 )     (7,810 )     (10,183 )
                                         
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (2,540 )     (69 )     (2,257 )     (15,899 )     (11,196 )
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period
    5,129       7,386       7,386       23,285       34,481  
                                         
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period
  $ 2,589     $ 7,317     $ 5,129     $ 7,386     $ 23,285  
                                         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
                                       
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 5,001     $ 3,300     $ 4,401     $ 1,751     $ 2,001  
 
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had not engaged in any business activities other than owning the common stock of Rockville Bank.


F-55


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
 
Note 20.   SELECTED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
 
The following table presents quarterly financial information of the Company for the periods indicated:
 
                                                                                 
    2010     2009     2008  
    June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
 
Interest and dividend income
  $ 18,620     $ 18,941     $ 18,940     $ 18,684     $ 19,114     $ 19,324     $ 19,983     $ 19,676     $ 18,940     $ 18,946  
Interest expense
    5,461       5,543       6,517       7,384       7,813       8,061       8,568       8,472       8,727       9,179  
                                                                                 
Net interest income
    13,159       13,398       12,423       11,300       11,301       11,263       11,415       11,204       10,213       9,767  
Provision for loan losses
    909       903       658       700       304       299       1,444       700       125       124  
                                                                                 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    12,250       12,495       11,765       10,600       10,997       10,964       9,971       10,504       10,088       9,643  
Non interest income (loss)(1)
    2,365       1,687       1,590       1,809       2,582       991       (786 )     (9,955 )     340       1,414  
Other non-interest expense
    9,392       9,635       8,970       8,842       9,715       9,104       7,829       8,233       8,356       9,344  
                                                                                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    5,223       4,547       4,385       3,567       3,864       2,851       1,356       (7,684 )     2,072       1,713  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    1,759       1,693       1,503       1,227       1,270       935       189       (2,382 )     679       558  
                                                                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 3,464     $ 2,854     $ 2,882     $ 2,340     $ 2,594     $ 1,916     $ 1,167     $ (5,302 )   $ 1,393     $ 1,155  
                                                                                 
Earnings (loss) per share:
                                                                               
Basic and diluted
  $ 0.19     $ 0.15     $ 0.16     $ 0.13     $ 0.14     $ 0.10     $ 0.06     $ (0.29 )   $ 0.08     $ 0.06  
Stock price (per share):
                                                                               
High
  $ 12.64     $ 12.42     $ 11.68     $ 14.79     $ 12.50     $ 14.46     $ 15.50     $ 17.00     $ 14.50     $ 13.98  
Low
  $ 10.50     $ 8.82     $ 9.68     $ 9.88     $ 8.44     $ 6.17     $ 8.80     $ 12.00     $ 12.51     $ 9.75  
 
 
(1) In the second quarter of 2008, non-interest income included other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.2 million related to preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. In the third quarter of 2008, non-interest income included other-than-temporary impairment charges of $9.8 million related to preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, $1.1 million related to one pooled trust preferred security, $395,000 related to one mutual fund and $208,000 related to four common stocks. In the fourth quarter of 2008, non-interest income included other-than-temporary impairment charges of $612,000 related to preferred stock of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, $191,000 related to one mutual fund and $914,000 related to eleven common stocks. In the first quarter of 2009, non-interest income included other-than temporary impairment charges of $65,000 related to one mutual fund and $292,000 related to three equity securities. No material charges were taken in the remainder of 2009. In the second quarter of 2009 the Company recorded $867,000 of security gains and $289,000 of gains on the sale of one-to-four family fixed rate residential loans. Refer to “Note 7 — Investment Securities” for additional information on other-than-temporary impairments.
 
Note 21.   SUBSEQUENT EVENT
 
Family Choice Mortgage Company
 
On September 21, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of Family Choice Mortgage Company, a privately held Massachusetts mortgage origination corporation operating in Massachusetts and Connecticut. The transaction closed on January 11, 2010 and now operates under the name


F-56


Table of Contents

Rockville Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Concluded)
 
of Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc., d/b/a Family Choice Mortgage, a subsidiary of Rockville Bank. This addition helps to expand the Company’s mortgage origination business, particularly in the area of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans, Veterans Administration (VA) loans, loans to first time home buyers, and Reverse Mortgages. The acquisition is structured as an earn-out whereby the principal of the business receives a cash payout over seven years, at a pace to be determined by income earned after taxes by the subsidiary. Policies and procedures have been implemented that govern expense and revenue sharing. The subsidiary will be included within the risk management system of the Company and is not expected to have a significant effect on the operations of the Company.
 
Plan of Stock Conversion
 
The respective Boards of Directors of Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. and Rockville Bank adopted a plan of conversion on September 16, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the plan of conversion, Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. will convert from a partially public mutual holding company structure to a fully public stock holding company structure. Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., the mutual holding company parent of Existing Rockville Financial, Inc., will merge with and into Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. and immediately thereafter, Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. will merge with and into Rockville Financial New, Inc., a newly formed subsidiary of Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. After the conversion, Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. and Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. will cease to exist. As part of the conversion, Rockville Financial New, Inc. is offering for sale the 56.7% ownership interest in Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. that is currently held by Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. In addition, the existing public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. will receive shares of common stock of Rockville Financial New, Inc. in exchange for their current shares of Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. common stock pursuant to an exchange ratio that ensures that the shareholders will own the same percentage of the common stock of Rockville Financial New, Inc. after the conversion as they held in Existing Rockville Financial, Inc. immediately prior to the conversion (without giving effect to any new shares purchased in the offering or cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares). When the conversion is completed, all of the outstanding common stock of Rockville Bank will be owned by Rockville Financial New, Inc., and all of the outstanding common stock of Rockville Financial New, Inc. will be owned by public shareholders (including Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc.). The highest priority will be depositors with qualifying deposits as of June 30, 2009.
 
The transactions contemplated by the Plan of Conversion are subject to approval of the Rockville Financial, Inc.’s shareholders, the corporators of the Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 
Effect on Liquidation Rights
 
Each qualifying depositor in Rockville Bank has both a deposit account in Rockville Bank and a pro rata ownership interest in the Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. based upon the balance in his or her account. This interest may only be realized in the event of a complete liquidation of the Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. and Rockville Bank. However, this ownership interest is tied to the depositor’s account and has no tangible market value separate from the deposit account. Any depositor who opens a qualifying deposit account obtains a pro rata ownership interest in the Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. without any additional payment beyond the amount of the deposit. A depositor who reduces or closes his or her account receives a portion or all of the balance in the deposit account but nothing for his or her ownership interest in the net worth of the Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., which is lost to the extent that the balance in the account is reduced or closed.


F-57


Table of Contents

 
 
No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representation other than as contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such other information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by Rockville Financial New, Inc. or Rockville Bank. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities offered hereby to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale hereunder shall under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of New Rockville Financial, Inc. or Rockville Bank since any of the dates as of which information is furnished herein or since the date hereof.
 
Up to 14,950,000 Shares
(Subject to increase to up to 17,192,500 shares)
 
(ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC. LOGO)
 
(Proposed Holding Company for Rockville Bank)
 
COMMON STOCK
no par value
 
 
PROSPECTUS
 
 
 
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
 
[Date of Prospectus]
 
 
 
 
These securities are not deposits or accounts and are not federally insured or guaranteed.
 
 
 
 
Until          , 2010 or 25 days after commencement of the syndicated community offering, if any, whichever is later, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
 
 


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL NEW, INC.,
A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION
(Proposed new holding company for Rockville Bank)
 
PROXY STATEMENT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.,
A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION
(Current Mid-Tier Holding Company for Rockville Bank)
 
We are converting from a mutual holding company structure to a fully-public stock holding company structure. Currently, Rockville Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rockville Financial, Inc, a Connecticut corporation (“Existing Rockville Financial”), and Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. (“Rockville Financial MHC”) owns approximately 56.7% of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock. The remaining 43.3% of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock is owned by public shareholders. Upon the completion of the conversion, both Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC will cease to exist, and Rockville Bank will be wholly-owned by Rockville Financial New, Inc. (“New Rockville Financial”).
 
Each share of Existing Rockville Financial common stock owned by the public will be exchanged for between 0.9725 and 1.3158 shares (subject to adjustment to up to 1.5131 shares) of common stock of New Rockville Financial, so that immediately after the conversion Existing Rockville Financial’s existing public shareholders will own the same percentage of New Rockville Financial common stock as they owned of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock immediately prior to the conversion, excluding any new shares purchased by them in the offering and their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional exchange shares. However, pursuant to FDIC and Federal Reserve Board policies, the exchange ratio must be adjusted downward to reflect the aggregate amount of Existing Rockville Financial dividends paid to Rockville Financial MHC and the initial capitalization of Rockville Financial MHC. Dividends were paid to Rockville Financial MHC because the Federal Reserve Board’s dividend policy does not permit a mutual holding company to waive dividends declared by its subsidiary. Rockville Financial MHC had assets of $7.685 million as of June 30, 2010, not including Existing Rockville Financial common stock. The adjustments described above will decrease Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders’ ownership interest in New Rockville Financial from 43.30% to 41.81%.
 
The actual number of shares that you will receive will depend on the percentage of Existing Rockville Financial common stock held by the public at the completion of the conversion, the final independent appraisal of New Rockville Financial and the number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock sold in the offering described in the following paragraph. It will not depend on the market price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. See “Proposal 1 — Approval of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization — Share Exchange Ratio for Current Shareholders” for a discussion of the exchange ratio. Based on the $      per share closing price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock as of the last trading day prior to the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, unless at least           shares of New Rockville Financial common stock are sold in the offering (which is between the           and the           of the offering range), the initial value of the New Rockville Financial common stock you receive in the share exchange would be less than the market value of the Existing Rockville Financial common stock you currently own. See “Risk Factors — The market value of New Rockville Financial common stock received in the share exchange may be less than the market value of Existing Rockville Financial common stock exchanged.”
 
Concurrently with the exchange, we are offering up to 14,950,000 shares of common stock (subject to increase to up to 17,192,500 shares) of New Rockville Financial, representing the 56.7% ownership interest of Rockville Financial MHC in Existing Rockville Financial, for sale to eligible depositors of Rockville Bank and our tax-qualified benefit plans, and to the public, including Existing Rockville Financial shareholders, at a price of $10.00 per share. The conversion of Rockville Financial MHC and the offering and exchange of common stock by New Rockville Financial is referred to herein as the “conversion and offering.” After the conversion and offering are completed, Rockville Bank will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Rockville Financial, and 100% of the common stock of New Rockville Financial will be owned by public shareholders. As a result of the conversion and offering, Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC will cease to exist.


Table of Contents

Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “RCKB”. We expect that New Rockville Financial’s shares of common stock will trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “RCKBD” for a period of 20 trading days after the completion of this offering. Thereafter, New Rockville Financial’s trading symbol will revert to “RCKB.” New Rockville Financial’s name will be changed to Rockville Financial, Inc. upon completion of the conversion.
 
The conversion and offering cannot be completed unless the shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial approve the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization of Rockville Financial MHC, referred to herein as the “plan of conversion.” Existing Rockville Financial is holding a special meeting of shareholders at La Renaissance, 53 Prospect Hill, East Windsor, CT 06088, on December 17, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, to consider and vote upon the plan of conversion. We must obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of (i) a majority of the total number of votes entitled to be cast at the special meeting by Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders, including shares held by Rockville Financial MHC, and (ii) a majority of the total number of votes entitled to be cast at the special meeting by Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders other than Rockville Financial MHC Existing Rockville Financial’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the approval of the plan of conversion.
 
This document serves as the proxy statement for the special meeting of shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial and the prospectus for the shares of New Rockville Financial common stock to be issued in exchange for shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. We urge you to read this entire document carefully. You can also obtain information about us from documents that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Reserve Board. This document does not serve as the prospectus relating to the offering by New Rockville Financial of its shares of common stock in the offering, which will be made pursuant to a separate prospectus. Shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial are not required to participate in the offering.
 
THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF PRINCIPAL. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE SECTION ENTITLED “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 8 OF THIS PROSPECTUS.
 
THESE SECURITIES ARE NOT BANK DEPOSITS AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, NOR ARE THEY OBLIGATIONS OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, A BANK.
 
NEITHER THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY BODY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
 
For answers to your questions, please read this proxy statement/prospectus including the Questions and Answers section, beginning on page 1. Questions about voting on the plan of conversion may be directed to our Stock Information Center, Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time. The Stock Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank holidays. The toll-free phone number is (877)          -          .
 
The date of this proxy statement/prospectus is          , 2010, and it is first being mailed to shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial on or about          , 2010.


Table of Contents

ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
25 Park Street
Rockville, Connecticut 06066
(860) 291-3600
 
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
 
On December 17, 2010, Rockville Financial, Inc. will hold a special meeting of shareholders at La Renaissance, 53 Prospect Hill, East Windsor, CT 06088. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. At the meeting, shareholders will consider and act on the following:
 
1. The approval of a plan of conversion and reorganization (the “Plan”) whereby: (a) Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. (“Rockville Financial MHC”), Rockville Financial, Inc. (“Existing Rockville Financial”) and Rockville Bank will convert and reorganize from the mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure; (b) Rockville Financial New, Inc., a Connecticut stock corporation (“New Rockville Financial”), will become the new stock holding company of Rockville Bank; (c) the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial, other than shares held by Rockville Financial MHC, will be exchanged for shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial so that our existing public shareholders will own the same percentage of New Rockville Financial common stock as they owned of our common stock immediately prior to the conversion; and (d) New Rockville Financial will offer for sale shares of its common stock in a subscription offering, community offering and, possibly, a syndicated community offering;
 
2. The approval of the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the plan of conversion and reorganization; and
 
3. Such other business that may properly come before the meeting.
 
NOTE: The Board of Directors is not aware of any other business to come before the meeting.
 
The Board of Directors has fixed [shareholder record date], as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting and at an adjournment or postponement thereof.
 
Upon written request addressed to the Secretary of Existing Rockville Financial at the address given above, shareholders may obtain an additional copy of this proxy statement/prospectus and/or a copy of the plan of conversion. In order to assure timely receipt of the additional copy of the proxy statement/prospectus and/or the plan of conversion, the written request should be received by Existing Rockville Financial, by          , 2010.
 
Please complete and sign the enclosed proxy, which is solicited by the Board of Directors, and mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope. If you prefer, you may vote by using the telephone or Internet. For information on submitting your proxy or voting by telephone or Internet, please refer to instructions on the enclosed proxy card. The proxy will not be used if you attend the meeting and vote in person.
 
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
-S- JUDY KEPPNER CLARK
Judy Keppner Clark
Secretary
 
Rockville, Connecticut
          , 2010


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    1  
    5  
    8  
    11  
    14  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    15  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  


Table of Contents

 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
REGARDING THE PLAN OF CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION
AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
 
You should read this document for more information about the conversion and reorganization. The plan of conversion and reorganization described herein (referred to as the “plan of conversion”) has been conditionally approved by Rockville Bank’s primary regulator, the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, and the establishment of New Rockville Financial as a bank holding company has been conditionally approved by the Federal Reserve Board. Such approvals by those agencies, however, do not constitute recommendations or endorsements of the plan of conversion.
 
Q. WHAT ARE SHAREHOLDERS BEING ASKED TO APPROVE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING?
 
A. Existing Rockville Financial shareholders as of [shareholder record date] are being asked to vote to approve the plan of conversion pursuant to which Rockville Financial MHC will convert from the mutual to the stock form of organization. As part of the conversion, a newly formed Connecticut corporation, New Rockville Financial, is offering its common stock to eligible depositors of Rockville Bank and to our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, and to the public, including shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial as of [shareholder record date]. The shares offered represent after pro forma adjustments Rockville Financial MHC’s current 56.7% ownership interest in Existing Rockville Financial. Voting for approval of the plan of conversion will also include approval of the exchange ratio and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of New Rockville Financial. Your vote is important. Without sufficient votes “FOR” this approval, we cannot implement the plan of conversion.
 
In addition, Existing Rockville Financial shareholders are being asked to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the plan of conversion.
 
Your vote is important. Without sufficient votes “FOR” approval of the plan of conversion, we cannot implement the plan of conversion and the related offering.
 
Q. WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THE CONVERSION AND RELATED OFFERING?
 
A. The purpose of converting to the fully public stock form of ownership and conducting the offering at this time is to provide us with additional capital to support our continued planned growth, to take advantage of potential growth and strategic opportunities, and to successfully implement our business strategies. In addition, the conversion is a necessary and appropriate response to the changing market and regulatory conditions and will allow us to continue to compete effectively in the changing financial services marketplace. The conversion and offering also provides our employees and customers with the opportunity to share in our success through the ownership of our stock, and our shareholders will benefit from the more active and liquid trading market that will exist when Rockville Bank’s holding company is 100.0% publicly owned.
 
Although Rockville Bank is categorized as “well-capitalized” and does not require additional capital, our board of directors has determined that current opportunities for continued growth make pursuing the conversion and offering at this time desirable. As a fully converted stock holding company, we will have greater flexibility in structuring mergers and acquisitions, including the form of consideration that we can use to pay for an acquisition. Our current mutual holding company structure limits our ability to offer shares of our common stock as consideration for a merger or acquisition since Rockville Financial MHC is required to own a majority of our shares of common stock. Our ability to compete with other financial institutions for acquisition opportunities will be enhanced by our ability to offer stock or cash consideration, or a combination of stock and cash consideration in potential business transactions. Potential sellers often want stock for at least part of the purchase price. Our new stock holding company structure will enable us to offer stock or cash consideration, or a combination of stock and cash, and will therefore enhance our ability to compete with other bidders when acquisition opportunities arise. We do not currently have any agreement or understanding as to any specific acquisition.


1


Table of Contents

 
In addition, the conversion is a necessary and appropriate response to the changing market and regulatory conditions and will allow us to continue to compete effectively in the changing financial services marketplace. Our shareholders will also benefit from the more active and liquid trading market that will exist when Rockville Bank’s holding company is 100% publicly owned.
 
Q. WHAT WILL SHAREHOLDERS RECEIVE FOR THEIR EXISTING SHARES OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL?
 
A. As more fully described in “Proposal 1 — Approval of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization — Share Exchange Ratio,” depending on the number of shares sold in the offering, each share of common stock that you own at the time of the completion of the conversion will be exchanged for between 7,939,517 shares at the minimum and 10,741,700 shares at the maximum of the offering range (or 12,352,955 at the adjusted maximum of the offering range) of New Rockville Financial common stock (cash will be paid in lieu of any fractional shares). For example, if you own 100 shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, and the exchange ratio is 1.1441 (at the midpoint of the offering range), after the conversion you will receive 114 shares of New Rockville Financial common stock and $4.41 in cash, the value of the fractional share, based on the $10.00 per share purchase price of stock in the offering.
 
If you own shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock in a brokerage account in “street name,” your shares will be automatically exchanged, and you do not need to take any action to exchange your shares of common stock. If you own shares in the form of Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates after the completion of the conversion and offering, our exchange agent will mail to you a transmittal form with instructions to surrender your stock certificates. New certificates of New Rockville Financial common stock will be mailed to you within           business days after the exchange agent receives properly executed transmittal forms and your Existing Rockville Financial stock certificates. You should not submit a stock certificate until you receive a transmittal form.
 
Q. WHY WILL THE SHARES I RECEIVE BE BASED ON A PRICE OF $10.00 PER SHARE RATHER THAN THE TRADING PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONVERSION?
 
A. The $10.00 per share price was selected primarily because it is a commonly selected per share price for mutual-to-stock conversion offerings. The amount of common stock New Rockville Financial will issue at $10.00 per share in the offering and the exchange is based on an independent appraisal of the estimated market value of New Rockville Financial, assuming the conversion and offering are completed. RP Financial, LC., an appraisal firm experienced in appraisal of financial institutions, has estimated that, as of August 26, 2010, this market value ranged from $189.9 million to $256.9 million, with a midpoint of $223.4 million. Based on this valuation, the number of shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial that existing public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive in exchange for their shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock will range from 7,939,517 shares at the minimum and 10,741,700 shares at the maximum of the offering range, with a value of $79.4 million at the minimum and $107.4 million at the maximum of the offering range. If market conditions so warrant, the appraised value can be increased to $295.5 million, the adjusted maximum of the appraisal, and the number of shares issued in the exchange for existing shares of Existing Rockville Financial can be increased to 12,352,955, with a value of $123.5 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range. The number of shares received by the existing public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial is intended to maintain their existing ownership in our organization (excluding any new shares purchased by them in the offering and their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional exchange shares). However, pursuant to FDIC and Federal Reserve Board policies, the exchange ratio must be adjusted downward to reflect the aggregate amount of Existing Rockville Financial dividends paid to Rockville Financial MHC and the initial capitalization of Rockville Financial MHC. Dividends were paid to Rockville Financial MHC because the Federal Reserve Board’s dividend policy does not permit a mutual holding company to waive dividends declared by its subsidiary. Rockville Financial MHC had assets of $7.685 million as of June 30, 2010, not including Existing Rockville Financial common stock. The


2


Table of Contents

adjustments described above will decrease Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders’ ownership interest in New Rockville Financial from 43.30% to 41.81%.
 
The independent appraisal is based in part on Existing Rockville Financial’s financial condition and results of operations, the pro forma impact of the additional capital raised by the sale of shares of common stock in the offering, and an analysis of a peer group of 13 publicly traded savings bank and thrift holding companies that RP Financial, LC. considered comparable to Existing Rockville Financial. RP Financial also considered the following factors, among others:
 
• our historical, present and projected operating results and financial condition;
 
• the economic, demographic and competition characteristics of our market area;
 
• a comparative evaluation of our operating and financial statistics with those of other similarly-situated, publicly-traded savings and thrift holding companies;
 
• the effect of the capital raised in this offering on our net worth and earnings potential; and
 
• the trading market for our securities and comparable institutions and general economic conditions in the market for such securities.
 
Q. DOES THE EXCHANGE RATIO DEPEND ON THE TRADING PRICE OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL COMMON STOCK?
 
A. No, the exchange ratio will not be based on the market price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. Therefore, changes in the price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock between now and the completion of the conversion and offering will not affect the calculation of the exchange ratio.
 
Q. SHOULD I SUBMIT MY STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW?
 
A. No. If you hold stock certificate(s), instructions for exchanging the certificates will be sent to you by our exchange agent after completion of the conversion. If your shares are held in “street name” (e.g., in a brokerage account) rather than in certificate form, the share exchange will be reflected automatically in your account upon completion of the conversion.
 
Q. HOW DO I VOTE?
 
A. Mark your vote, sign each proxy card enclosed and return the card(s) to us, in the enclosed proxy reply envelope. If you prefer, you may vote by using the telephone or Internet. For information on submitting your proxy or voting by telephone or Internet, please refer to instructions on the enclosed proxy card. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY.
 
Q. IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN STREET NAME, WILL MY BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AUTOMATICALLY VOTE ON THE PLAN ON MY BEHALF?
 
A. No. Your broker, bank or other nominee will not be able to vote your shares without instructions from you. You should instruct your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares, using the directions that they provide to you.
 
Q. WHAT HAPPENS IF I DON’T VOTE?
 
A. Your vote is very important. Not voting all the proxy card(s) you receive will have the same effect as voting “against” the plan of conversion. Without sufficient favorable votes “for” the plan of conversion, we will not proceed with the conversion and offering.
 
Q. WHAT IF I DO NOT GIVE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO MY BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE?
 
A. Your vote is important. If you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares, the unvoted proxy will have the same effect as a vote “against” the plan of conversion.


3


Table of Contents

 
Q. MAY I PLACE AN ORDER TO PURCHASE SHARES IN THE OFFERING, IN ADDITION TO THE SHARES THAT I WILL RECEIVE IN THE EXCHANGE?
 
A. Yes. If you would like to receive a prospectus and stock order form, you must call our Stock Information Center at 1-877-     , Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Stock Information Center is closed weekends and bank holidays.
 
Eligible depositors of Rockville Bank and our tax-qualified benefit plans have priority subscription rights allowing them to purchase common stock in a subscription offering. Shares not purchased in the subscription offering may be available for sale to the public in a community offering, as described herein. In the event orders for New Rockville Financial common stock in a community offering exceed the number of shares available for sale, shares may be allocated (to the extent shares remain available) first to cover orders of natural persons residing in Hartford, Tolland and New London Counties in Connecticut; second to cover orders of Existing Rockville Financial shareholders as of [voting record date]; and third to cover orders of natural persons residing in Connecticut. If necessary, shares may also be offered in a syndicated community offering in order to meet the minimum sale requirements of the plan of conversion.
 
Shares of common stock purchased in the offering by a shareholder and his or her associates or individuals acting in concert with the shareholder, plus any shares a shareholder and these individuals receive in the exchange for existing shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, may not exceed 5% of the total shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial to be issued and outstanding after the completion of the conversion. This limitation, however, will not require any Existing Rockville Financial shareholder to divest an exchange share or otherwise limit the amount of exchange shares to be issued to such shareholder.
 
Q. WILL THE CONVERSION HAVE ANY EFFECT ON DEPOSIT AND LOAN ACCOUNTS AT ROCKVILLE BANK?
 
A. No. The account number, amount, interest rate and withdrawal rights of deposit accounts will remain unchanged. Deposits will continue to be federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the legal limit. Loans and rights of borrowers will not be affected. Only shareholders of New Rockville Financial will have voting rights after the conversion and offering.
 
Please note that properly completed and signed stock order forms, with full payment, must be received (not postmarked) by the Stock Information Center no later than 12:00 noon, Eastern Time on [December 13], 2010.
 
OTHER QUESTIONS?
 
For answers to your other questions, please call our Stock Information Center, Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time. The Stock Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank holidays. The toll-free phone number is (877)          -          .


4


Table of Contents

 
SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights material information from this proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all the information that is important to you. To understand the conversion and other proposals fully, you should read this entire document carefully, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Proposal 1 — Approval of The Plan of Conversion and Reorganization,” “Proposal 2 — Adjournment of the Special Meeting.”
 
The Existing Rockville Financial Special Meeting
 
Date, Time and Place.   Existing Rockville Financial will hold its special meeting of shareholders at La Renaissance, 53 Prospect Hill, East Windsor, CT 06088, on December 17, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time.
 
The Proposals.   Shareholders will be voting on the following proposals at the special meeting:
 
1. The approval of a plan of conversion and reorganization (the “Plan”) whereby: (a) Rockville Financial MHC and Rockville Financial, Inc., a Connecticut corporation (“Existing Rockville Financial”) will convert and reorganize from the mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure; (b) New Rockville Financial, Inc., a Connecticut corporation (“New Rockville Financial”), will become the new stock holding company of Rockville Bank; (c) the outstanding shares of Existing Rockville Financial other than those held by Rockville Financial MHC, will be converted into shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial; and (d) New Rockville Financial will offer shares of its common stock for sale in a subscription offering, community offering and, possibly, a syndicated community offering;
 
2. The approval of the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the plan of conversion and reorganization; and
 
3. Such other business that may properly come before the meeting.
 
Vote Required for Approval of Proposals by the Shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial
 
Proposal 1: Approval of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization.   We must obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of (i) a majority of the total number of votes eligible to be cast at the special meeting by Existing Rockville Financial shareholders, including shares held by Rockville Financial MHC, and (ii) a majority of the total number of votes entitled to be cast at the special meeting by Existing Rockville Financial shareholders other than Rockville Financial MHC.
 
Proposal 2: Approval of the adjournment of the special meeting.   We must obtain the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by Existing Rockville Financial shareholders at the special meeting to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the proposal to approve the plan of conversion.
 
Other Matters.   We must obtain the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes eligible to be cast at the special meeting by Existing Rockville Financial shareholders. At this time, we know of no other matters that may be presented at the special meeting.
 
Revocability of Proxies
 
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken at the special meeting. To revoke your proxy, you must advise the corporate secretary of Existing Rockville Financial in writing before your common stock has been voted at the special meeting, deliver a later-dated proxy or attend the special meeting and vote your shares in person. Attendance at the special meeting will not in itself constitute revocation of your proxy.


5


Table of Contents

Vote by Rockville Financial MHC
 
Management anticipates that Rockville Financial MHC, our majority shareholder, will vote all of its shares of common stock in favor of all the matters set forth above. If Rockville Financial MHC votes all of its shares in favor of each proposal, the approval of the adjournment of the special meeting if necessary, would be assured.
 
As of September 16, 2010, the directors and executive officers of Existing Rockville Financial beneficially owned 796,313 shares, or approximately 4.22% of the outstanding shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, and Rockville Financial MHC owned 10,689,250 shares, or approximately 56.7% of the outstanding shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock.
 
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the plan of conversion and “FOR” the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary.
 
The Companies
 
[Same as offering prospectus]
 
Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
 
The Boards of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial, Rockville Financial MHC, Rockville Bank and New Rockville Financial have adopted a plan of conversion pursuant to which Rockville Bank will reorganize from a mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure. Public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive shares in New Rockville Financial in exchange for their shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock based on an exchange ratio. This conversion to a stock holding company structure also includes the offering by New Rockville Financial of shares of its common stock to eligible depositors of Rockville Bank and to our tax-qualified stock benefit plans in a subscription offering and to the public in a community offering, including natural persons residing of Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut, Existing Rockville Financial shareholders and natural persons residing in Connecticut, and, if necessary, a syndicated community offering or other public offering. Following the conversion and offering, Rockville Financial MHC and Existing Rockville Financial will no longer exist, and New Rockville Financial will be the parent company of Rockville Bank.
 
The conversion and offering cannot be completed unless the shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial approve the plan of conversion. Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders will vote on the plan of conversion at Existing Rockville Financial’s special meeting of shareholders. This document is the proxy statement used by Existing Rockville Financial’s Board of Directors to solicit proxies for the special meeting. It is also the prospectus of New Rockville Financial regarding the shares of New Rockville Financial common stock to be issued to Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders in the share exchange. This document does not serve as the prospectus relating to the offering by New Rockville Financial of its shares of common stock in the subscription offering and any community offering or syndicated community offering, which will be made pursuant to a separate prospectus.
 
Our Current Organizational Structure
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Our Organizational Structure Following the Conversion
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Reasons for the Conversion
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]


6


Table of Contents

Conditions to Completion of the Conversion
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
The Exchange of Existing Shares of Existing Rockville Financial Common Stock
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
How We Determined the Offering Range and the $10.00 Per Share Stock Price
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
How We Intend to Use the Proceeds From the Offering
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Our Dividend Policy
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Purchases and Ownership by Officers and Directors
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Benefits to Management and Potential Dilution to Shareholders Resulting from the Conversion
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Market for Common Stock
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Tax Consequences
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Changes in Shareholders’ Rights for Existing Shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
See “Comparison of Shareholders’ Rights For Existing Shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial” for a discussion of these differences.
 
Important Risks in Owning New Rockville Financial’s Common Stock
 
Before you decide to vote in favor of the plan of conversion with the resulting exchange of your Existing Rockville Financial common stock for New Rockville Financial common stock, you should read the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page    of this proxy statement/prospectus.


7


Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
 
You should consider carefully the following risk factors in evaluating an investment in the shares of common stock.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Risks Related to the Offering and the Exchange
 
The market value of New Rockville Financial common stock received in the share exchange may be less than the market value of Existing Rockville Financial common stock exchanged.
 
The number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock you receive will be based on an exchange ratio that will be determined as of the date of completion of the conversion and offering. The exchange ratio will be based on the percentage of Existing Rockville Financial common stock held by the public prior to the completion of the conversion and offering, the final independent appraisal of New Rockville Financial common stock prepared by RP Financial, LC. and the number of shares of common stock sold in the offering. The exchange ratio will ensure that existing public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial common stock will own the same percentage of New Rockville Financial common stock after the conversion and offering as they owned of Existing Rockville Financial common stock immediately prior to completion of the conversion and offering (excluding any new shares purchased by them in the offering and their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional exchange shares). The exchange ratio will not depend on the market price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock.
 
The exchange ratio ranges from 0.9725 shares at the minimum to 1.3158 shares at the maximum (or 1.5131 at the adjusted maximum) of the offering range of New Rockville Financial common stock per share of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. Shares of New Rockville Financial common stock issued in the share exchange will have an initial value of $10.00 per share. Depending on the exchange ratio and the market value of Existing Rockville Financial common stock at the time of the exchange, the initial market value of the New Rockville Financial common stock that you receive in the share exchange could be less than the market value of the Existing Rockville Financial common stock that you currently own. Based on the most recent closing price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock prior to the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, which was $     , unless at least           shares of New Rockville Financial common stock are sold in the offering (which is between the           and the           of the offering range), the initial value of the New Rockville Financial common stock you receive in the share exchange would be less than the market value of the Existing Rockville Financial common stock you currently own.
 
[Remaining offering risks are the same as the offering prospectus]


8


Table of Contents

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING
 
General
 
This proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial of proxies to be voted at the special meeting of shareholders to be held at La Renaissance, 53 Prospect Hill, East Windsor, CT 06088, on December 17, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
 
The purpose of the special meeting is to consider and vote upon the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization of Rockville Financial MHC (referred to herein as the “plan of conversion”).
 
In addition, shareholders will vote on a proposal to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the proposals.
 
Voting in favor of or against the plan of conversion includes a vote for or against the conversion of Rockville Financial MHC to a stock holding company as contemplated by the plan of conversion. Voting in favor of the plan of conversion will not obligate you to purchase any shares of common stock in the offering and will not affect the balance, interest rate or federal deposit insurance of any deposits at Rockville Bank.
 
Who Can Vote at the Meeting
 
You are entitled to vote your Existing Rockville Financial common stock if our records show that you held your shares as of the close of business on [shareholder record date]. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote.
 
As of the close of business on [shareholder record date], there were 18,853,112 shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock has one vote.
 
Attending the Meeting
 
If you are a shareholder as of the close of business on [shareholder record date], you may attend the meeting. However, if you hold your shares in street name, you will need proof of ownership to be admitted to the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or a letter from a bank or broker are examples of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock held in street name in person at the meeting, you will have to get a written proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.
 
Quorum; Vote Required
 
The special meeting will be held only if there is a quorum. A quorum exists if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, is present at the meeting. If you return valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting in person, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you abstain from voting. Broker non-votes also will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.
 
Proposal 1: Approval of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization.   We must obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of (i) a majority of the outstanding common stock of Existing Rockville Financial entitled to be cast at the special meeting, including shares held by Rockville Financial MHC, and (ii) a majority of the


9


Table of Contents

outstanding shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial entitled to be cast at the special meeting, other than shares held by Rockville Financial MHC.
 
Proposal 2: Approval of the adjournment of the special meeting.   We must obtain the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes cast by Existing Rockville Financial shareholders entitled to vote at the special meeting to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the proposal to approve the plan of conversion.
 
Other Matters.   We must obtain the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast by holders of outstanding shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial for other matters that may be presented at the special meeting. At this time, we know of no other matters that may be presented at the special meeting.
 
Shares Held by Rockville Financial MHC and Our Officers and Directors
 
As of [shareholder record date], Rockville Financial MHC beneficially owned 10,689,250 shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock. This equals approximately 56.7% of our outstanding shares. Rockville Financial MHC intends to vote all of its shares in favor of Proposal 1 — Approval of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization and Proposal 2 — Approval of the Adjournment of the Special Meeting.
 
As of [shareholder record date], our officers and directors beneficially owned 796,313 shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock, not including shares that they may acquire upon the exercise of outstanding stock options. This equals 4.22% of our outstanding shares and 9.75% of shares held by persons other than Rockville Financial MHC.
 
Voting by Proxy
 
Our Board of Directors is sending you this proxy statement/prospectus to request that you allow your shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock to be represented at the special meeting by the persons named in the enclosed proxy card. All shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock represented at the meeting by properly executed and dated proxies will be voted according to the instructions indicated on the proxy card. If you sign, date and return a proxy card without giving voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the plan of conversion and “FOR” approval of the adjournment of the special meeting.
 
If any matters not described in this proxy statement/prospectus are properly presented at the special meeting, the members of the Board of Directors will use their judgment to determine how to vote your shares. We do not know of any other matters to be presented at the special meeting.
 
If your Existing Rockville Financial common stock is held in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee that you must follow to have your shares voted. Your broker, bank or other nominee may allow you to deliver your voting instructions via the telephone or the Internet. Please see the instruction form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee that accompanies this proxy statement/prospectus.
 
Revocability of Proxies
 
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken at the special meeting. To revoke your proxy, you must advise the corporate secretary of Existing Rockville Financial in writing before your common stock has been voted at the special meeting, deliver a later-dated proxy or attend the special meeting and vote your shares in person. Attendance at the special meeting will not in itself constitute revocation of your proxy.
 
Solicitation of Proxies
 
This proxy statement/prospectus and the accompanying proxy card are being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting by the Board of Directors. Existing Rockville Financial will pay the costs of soliciting proxies from its shareholders. To the extent necessary to permit approval of the plan of conversion and the other proposals being considered, directors, officers or


10


Table of Contents

employees of Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Bank may solicit proxies by mail, telephone and other forms of communication. We will reimburse such persons for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation.
 
We will also reimburse banks, brokers, nominees and other fiduciaries for the expenses they incur in forwarding the proxy materials to you.
 
[New Rockville Financial has retained [          ] to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of [$     ], plus reimbursement of its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with acting in this role.           will answer any inquiries from Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders about this proxy statement, the proxies, the special meeting and how to vote your shares. If you need additional copies of the proxy material or have any questions, you should contact:
 
 
Shareholders, please call: (          )          -          . Banks and brokerage firms and all others, please call: (          )          -          .]
 
Participants in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan
 
If you participate in the Rockville Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”), you will receive a voting instruction form that reflects all shares you may direct the trustees to vote on your behalf under the plans. Under the terms of the ESOP, the ESOP trustee votes all shares held by the ESOP, but each ESOP participant may direct the trustee how to vote the shares of common stock allocated to his or her account. The ESOP trustee, subject to the exercise of its fiduciary duties, will vote all unallocated shares of Existing Rockville Financial common stock held by the ESOP and allocated shares for which no voting instructions are received in the same proportion as shares for which it has received timely voting instructions. The deadline for returning your voting instructions to the ESOP’s trustee is          , 2010.
 
Participants in the 401(k) Plan
 
If you hold shares of common stock through the Rockville Bank 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), you will receive a voting instruction form that reflects all shares that you may direct the trustee to vote on your behalf under the 401(k) Plan. Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, a participant is entitled to direct the trustee to vote the shares in the 401(k) Plan credited to his or her account. The trustee will vote all shares for which no directions are given or for which instructions were not timely received in the same proportion as shares for which the trustee received voting instructions. The deadline for returning your voting instructions to the 401(k) Plan’s trustee is          , 2010.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
The Board of Directors recommends that you promptly sign and mark the enclosed proxy “FOR” the above described proposals, including, the adoption of the plan of conversion and promptly return it in the enclosed envelope. Voting the proxy card will not prevent you from voting in person at the special meeting. If you prefer, you may vote by using the telephone or Internet. For information on submitting your proxy or voting by telephone or Internet, please refer to the instructions on the enclosed proxy.
 
Your prompt vote is very important. Failure to vote will have the same effect as voting against the plan of conversion.
 
PROPOSAL 1 — APPROVAL OF THE PLAN OF CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION
 
The Board of Directors of Rockville Bank, Existing Rockville Financial, and Rockville Financial MHC and the corporators of Rockville Financial MHC have approved the plan of conversion and reorganization, referred to herein as the “plan of conversion.” The plan of conversion must also be approved by the shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial. A special meeting of shareholders has been called for this purpose. The plan of conversion and has been conditionally approved by Rockville Bank’s primary regulator,


11


Table of Contents

the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, and the establishment of New Rockville Financial as a bank holding company has been conditionally approved by the Federal Reserve Board. Such approvals by those agencies, however, do not constitute recommendations or endorsements of the plan of conversion.
 
General
 
Pursuant to the plan of conversion, our organization will convert from the mutual holding company form of organization to the fully stock ownership form. Currently, Rockville Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Existing Rockville Financial, and Rockville Financial MHC owns approximately 56.7% of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock. The remaining 43.3% of Existing Rockville Financial’s common stock is owned by public shareholders.
 
As a result of the conversion, our newly formed company, New Rockville Financial, will become the holding company of Rockville Bank. Each share of Existing Rockville Financial common stock owned by the public will be exchanged for between 7,939,517 shares at the minimum and 10,741,700 shares at the maximum of the offering range (or 12,352,955 at the adjusted maximum of the offering range) of New Rockville Financial common stock. The actual number of shares that you will receive will depend on the percentage of Existing Rockville Financial common stock held by the public at the completion of the conversion, the final independent appraisal of New Rockville Financial and the number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock sold in the offering described in the following paragraph. The number of shares of New Rockville Financial common stock you receive will not depend on the market price of Existing Rockville Financial common stock.
 
The public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial will receive shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial in exchange for their shares of common stock of Existing Rockville Financial pursuant to an exchange ratio. Subject to adjustment, the exchange ratio ensures that the public shareholders will own the same percentage of the common stock of New Rockville Financial after the conversion as they held in Existing Rockville Financial immediately prior to the conversion, without giving effect to new shares purchased in the offering or cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares. However, pursuant to FDIC and Federal Reserve Board policies, the exchange ratio must be adjusted downward to reflect the aggregate amount of Existing Rockville Financial dividends paid to Rockville Financial MHC and the initial capitalization of Rockville Financial MHC. Dividends were paid to Rockville Financial MHC because the Federal Reserve Board’s dividend policy does not permit a mutual holding company to waive dividends declared by its subsidiary. Rockville Financial MHC had assets of $7.685 million as of June 30, 2010, not including Existing Rockville Financial common stock. The adjustments described above will decrease Existing Rockville Financial’s shareholders’ ownership interest in New Rockville Financial from 43.30% to 41.81%.
 
In accordance with the process described above, the independent appraiser determined New Rockville Financial’s pro forma market value by adjusting the exchange ratio downward to account for the assets held by Rockville Financial MHC and decreasing the ownership interest held by the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial accordingly. The exchange ratio will range from 0.9725 at the minimum of the offering range to 1.3158 at the maximum of the offering range, and has been designed to preserve the existing percentage of ownership held by the public shareholders of Existing Rockville Financial, adjusted for the assets held by Rockville Financial MHC, which is a 41.81% ownership interest (excluding any additional shares purchased by them in the offering and their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares). If a greater demand for shares of our common stock or a change in financial or market conditions warrant, the offering range may be increased by 15.0%, which would result in an offering range from 18,989,517 shares to 29,545,455 shares and an exchange ratio of 1.5131 at the maximum of the offering range.
 
Concurrently with the exchange offer, we are offering up to 14,950,000 shares of common stock of New Rockville Financial, representing the ownership interest of Rockville Financial MHC in Existing Rockville Financial and its assets other than the stock ownership in Existing Rockville Financial, for sale to eligible depositors and to the public at a price of $10.00 per share. After the conversion and offering are completed, Rockville Bank will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Rockville Financial, and 100% of the common


12


Table of Contents

stock of New Rockville Financial will be owned by public shareholders. As a result of the conversion and offering, Existing Rockville Financial and Rockville Financial MHC will cease to exist.
 
New Rockville Financial intends to contribute between $52.3 million and $71.1 million of net proceeds, or $81.9 million if the offering range is increased by 15%, to Rockville Bank and to retain between $44.6 million and $60.7 million of the net proceeds, or $69.9 million if the offering range is increased by 15% (excluding the portion of the net proceeds loaned to our employee stock ownership plan and contributed to the charitable foundation). The conversion will be consummated only upon the issuance of at least the minimum number of shares of our common stock offered pursuant to the plan of conversion and reorganization.
 
The plan of conversion and reorganization provides that we will offer shares of common stock in a “subscription offering” in the following descending order of priority:
 
(1) First, to Depositors of Rockville Bank with $50.00 or more on deposit as of the close of business on June 30, 2009.
 
(2) Second, to Rockville Bank’s tax-qualified benefit plans, including the ESOP and 401(k) Plan.
 
(3) Third, to Depositors of Rockville Bank with $50.00 or more on deposit as of the close of business on           who do not qualify under (1) above.
 
Shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering may be offered for sale to the general public in a “community offering,” with a preference given first to natural persons residing in Hartford, New London and Tolland Counties in Connecticut, then to Existing Rockville Financial’s public shareholders as of [shareholder record date], and then to natural persons residing in Connecticut. The community offering, if held, may begin concurrently with, during or promptly after the subscription offering as we may determine at any time. We also may offer for sale shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription and community offerings in a syndicated community offering managed by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. We have the right to accept or reject, in our sole discretion, orders received in the community offering or syndicated community offering. Any determination to accept or reject stock orders in the community offering and the syndicated community offering will be based on the facts and circumstances available to management at the time of the determination.
 
The community offering, if any, may begin concurrently with, during, or after the subscription offering and must be completed within 45 days after the completion of the subscription offering unless otherwise extended by the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. See “Community Offering.” The syndicated community offering may begin at any time following the commencement of the subscription offering and must be completed within 45 days after the completion of the subscription offering unless otherwise extended by us, with approval of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. See “Syndicated Community Offering.”
 
We determined the number of shares of common stock to be offered in the offering based upon an independent valuation of the estimated pro forma market value of New Rockville Financial. All shares of common stock to be sold in the offering will be sold at $10.00 per share. Investors will not be charged a commission to purchase shares of common stock in the offering. The independent valuation will be updated and the final number of the shares of common stock to be issued in the offering will be determined at the completion of the offering. See “Stock Pricing and Number of Shares to be Issued” for more information as to the determination of the estimated pro forma market value of the common stock.
 
The following is a brief summary of the conversion and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the plan of conversion and reorganization. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information.” We have filed a registration statement with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the common stock offered through this prospectus. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC, this prospectus does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement. You may examine this information without charge at the public reference facilities of the SEC located at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain copies of the material from the SEC at prescribed rates. The registration statement also is available through the SEC’s world wide web site on the internet at http://www.sec.gov, although certain statistical back up material included in one of the exhibits of the


13


Table of Contents

registration has been filed only in hard copy and is not available on the SEC’s world wide web site on the internet.
 
This document contains a description of the material features of certain contracts and other documents filed as exhibits to the registration statement. The statements as to the contents of such exhibits are of necessity brief descriptions and are not necessarily complete. Each such statement is qualified by reference to the contract or document.
 
Rockville Bank has filed an application for approval of its plan of conversion with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner. We have also filed an application with the Federal Reserve Board for establishment of New Rockville Financial as a bank holding company. This prospectus omits some information contained in those applications. The application for approval of the plan of conversion may be examined at the Office of the Connecticut Banking Commissioner, State of Connecticut Department of Banking, 260 Constitution Plaza, Hartford, Connecticut 06103. The bank holding company application may be inspected, without charge, at the offices of the Federal Reserve Board, 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106.
 
In connection with the offering, we will register the common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Upon this registration, New Rockville Financial will become subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proxy solicitation rules and periodic reporting requirements.
 
You may obtain a copy of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization as well as the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of New Rockville Financial without charge from us by contacting Judy Keppner Clark, Corporate Secretary, at Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074. Copies of the appraisal report of RP Financial, LC. and the detailed memorandum of the appraiser setting forth the method and assumptions for such appraisal are available for inspection at Rockville Bank, 1645 Ellington Road, South Windsor, Connecticut, by contacting Ms. Clark as indicated above.
 
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization of Rockville Financial MHC.
 
Reasons for the Conversion and Offering
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
Share Exchange Ratio for Current Shareholders
 
[Same as the offering prospectus]
 
PROPOSAL 2 — ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
 
If there are not sufficient votes to constitute a quorum or to approve the plan of conversion at the time of the special meeting, the proposals may not be approved unless the special meeting is adjourned to a later date or dates in order to permit further solicitation of proxies. In order to allow proxies that have been received by Existing Rockville Financial at the time of the special meeting to be voted for an adjournment, if necessary, Existing Rockville Financial has submitted the question of adjournment to its shareholders as a separate matter for their consideration. The Board of Directors of Existing Rockville Financial recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the adjournment proposal. If it is necessary to adjourn the special meeting, no notice of the adjourned special meeting is required to be given to shareholders (unless the adjournment is for more than 30 days or if a new record date is fixed), other than an announcement at the special meeting of the hour, date and place to which the special meeting is adjourned.
 
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the plan of conversion.


14


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
OUR DIVIDEND POLICY
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA REGULATORY CAPITAL COMPLIANCE
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
CAPITALIZATION
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
THE IMPACT OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC’S ASSETS ON MINORITY
STOCK OWNERSHIP
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
PRO FORMA DATA
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
BUSINESS OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
BUSINESS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL AND ROCKVILLE BANK
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
 
[same as the offering prospectus]


15


Table of Contents

 
TAXATION
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
MANAGEMENT
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
SUBSCRIPTIONS BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHTS FOR EXISTING
SHAREHOLDERS OF EXISTING ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
RESTRICTIONS ON ACQUISITION OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF NEW ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL FOLLOWING THE CONVERSION
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
TRANSFER AGENT
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
EXPERTS
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
LEGAL MATTERS
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
[same as the offering prospectus]
 
OTHER MATTERS
 
As of the date of this document, the Board of Directors is not aware of any business to come before the special meeting other than the matters described above in the proxy statement/prospectus. However, if any matters should properly come before the special meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will act in accordance with their best judgment.
 
[Financial Statements that are the same as the offering prospectus to appear here]


16


Table of Contents

 
PART II
 
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
 
Item 13.    Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
 
                 
          Amount(1)  
 
  *     Legal Fees and Expenses   $ 500,000  
  *     Blue Sky     5,000  
  *     Accounting Fees and Expenses     300,000  
  *     Conversion Agent and Data Processing Fees     30,000  
  *     Marketing Agent Expenses (including Legal Fees and Expenses)(1)     155,000  
  *     Marketing Agent Fees(1)     6,133,000  
  *     Appraisal Fees and Expenses     115,000  
  *     Printing, Postage, Mailing and EDGAR Fees     245,400  
  *     Filing Fees (Conn. Banking Commissioner, NASDAQ, FRB, FINRA and SEC)     158,500  
  *     Connecticut Sec. of the State Franchise taxes     125,000  
  *     Transfer Fees and Expenses     150,000  
  *     Business Plan Fees and Expenses     50,000  
  *     Other     70,000  
                 
  *     Total   $ 8,036,900  
                 
 
 
Estimated
 
(1) Rockville Financial New, Inc. has retained Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc. to assist in the sale of common stock on a best efforts basis in the offerings. Fees are estimated at the adjusted maximum of the offering range and assume that 40% of the shares are sold in the subscription and community offerings and 60% are sold in the syndicated community offering.
 
Item 14.    Indemnification of Directors and Officers
 
Article XI of the Bylaws of Rockville Financial New, Inc. (the “Corporation”) sets forth circumstances under which directors, officers, employees and agents of the Corporation may be insured or indemnified against liability which they incur in their capacities as such:
 
The Corporation shall indemnify and reimburse each current and former Director, officer or employee of this Corporation, or any other agent or person performing on behalf of the Corporation, and his or her heirs, executors, or administrators, to the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to those situations for which reimbursement and indemnification is permitted under Sections 33-770 through 33-778, inclusive, of the Connecticut General Statutes. In no event shall any payments made by the Corporation pursuant to this Article XI exceed the amount permissible under state or federal law, including but not limited to the limitations on indemnification imposed by Section 18(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 
Item 15.    Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
Not Applicable.


II-1


Table of Contents

 
Item 16.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules:
 
The exhibits and financial statement schedules filed (unless otherwise noted) as part of this registration statement are as follows:
 
  (a)   List of Exhibits
 
         
  1 .1   Engagement Letters between Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc. and Rockville Bank and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
  1 .2   Form of Agency Agreement between Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank, Rockville Financial New, Inc. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.*
  2 .1   Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
  3 .1   Certificate of Incorporation of Rockville Financial New, Inc.
  3 .1.1   Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Rockville Financial New, Inc. dated of September 16, 2010.
  3 .2   Bylaws of Rockville Financial New, Inc.
  4 .1   Form of Common Stock Certificate of Rockville Financial New, Inc.*
  5 .1   Opinion of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP regarding legality of securities being registered
  8 .1   Form of Tax Opinion of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP*
  10 .1   Employment Agreement as amended and restated by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and William J. McGurk, effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .2   Employment Agreement as amended and restated by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr., effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .3   Employment Agreement by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and Christopher E. Buchholz, effective June 7, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on June 13, 2006)
  10 .4   Change-in-Control and Restricted Covenant Agreement by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and John T. Lund, effective January 2, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .5   Employment Agreement as amended and restated by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and Richard J. Trachimowicz, effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .6   Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on December 18, 2007)
  10 .7   Rockville Bank Officer Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2.3 to Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on March 31, 2006)
  10 .8   Rockville Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. effective January 27, 2004.
  10 .9   First Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on December 18, 2007)
  10 .10   Executive Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement for Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. effective October 18, 1993.
  10 .11   Rockville Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on December 18, 2007)


II-2


Table of Contents

         
  10 .12   Rockville Financial, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix B in the Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on July 3, 2006)
  21 .1   Subsidiaries of Rockville Financial New, Inc. and Rockville Bank
  23 .1   Consent of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP (contained in Opinions included as Exhibits 5 and 8)
  23 .2   Consent of Deloitte & Touche, LLP
  23 .3   Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.
  23 .4   Consent of RP Financial, LC.
  24     Power of Attorney (set forth on signature page)
  99 .1   Appraisal Agreement between Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and RP Financial, LC.
  99 .2   Business Plan Agreement between Rockville Bank and FinPro, Inc.
  99 .3   Appraisal Report of RP Financial, LC.**
  99 .4   Marketing Materials*
  99 .5   Stock Order and Certification Form*
  99 .6   Form of Proxy Card*
 
 
 * To be filed at a later date.
 
** Supporting financial schedules filed in paper format only pursuant to Rule 202 of Regulation S-T. Available for inspection during business hours at the principal offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C.
 
  (b)   Financial Statement Schedules
 
No financial statement schedules are filed because the required information is not applicable or is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
 
Item 17.    Undertakings
 
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
 
(1) To file, during any period in which it offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
 
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

II-3


Table of Contents

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement;
 
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.
 
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
 
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
 
(4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
 
(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:
 
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
 
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 (§ 230.424 of this chapter);
 
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
 
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
 
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.


II-4


Table of Contents

(6) That, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
 
(7) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
 
(8) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.


II-5


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the Town of South Windsor, State of Connecticut on September 16, 2010.
 
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL NEW, INC.
 
  By: 
/s/  William J. McGurk
William J. McGurk
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative)
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
We, the undersigned directors and officers of Rockville Financial New, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby severally constitute and appoint William J. McGurk as our true and lawful attorney and agent, to do any and all things in our names in the capacities indicated below which said William J. McGurk may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with the registration statement on Form S-1 relating to the offering of the Company’s common stock, including specifically, but not limited to, power and authority to sign for us in our names in the capacities indicated below the registration statement and any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) thereto; and we hereby approve, ratify and confirm all that said William J. McGurk shall do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
             
Signatures
 
Title
 
Date
 
         
/s/  William J. McGurk

William J. McGurk
  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  John T. Lund

John T. Lund
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Michael A. Bars

Michael A. Bars
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  C. Perry Chilberg

C. Perry Chilberg
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  David A. Engelson

David A. Engelson
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Pamela J. Guenard

Pamela J. Guenard
  Director   September 16, 2010


II-6


Table of Contents

             
Signatures
 
Title
 
Date
 
         
/s/  Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.

Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Kristen A. Johnson

Kristen A. Johnson
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr.

Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr.
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Stuart E. Magdefrau

Stuart E. Magdefrau
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Thomas S. Mason

Thomas S. Mason
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Peter F. Olson

Peter F. Olson
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Rosemarie Novello Papa

Rosemarie Novello Papa
  Director   September 16, 2010
         
/s/  Richard M. Tkacz

Richard M. Tkacz
  Director   September 16, 2010


II-7


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
         
  1 .1   Engagement Letters between Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc. and Rockville Bank and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
  1 .2   Form of Agency Agreement between Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank, Rockville Financial New, Inc. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.*
  2 .1   Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
  3 .1   Certificate of Incorporation of Rockville Financial New, Inc.
  3 .1.1   Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Rockville Financial New, Inc. dated as of September 16, 2010.
  3 .2   Bylaws of Rockville Financial New, Inc.
  4 .1   Form of Common Stock Certificate of Rockville Financial New, Inc.*
  5 .1   Opinion of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP regarding legality of securities being registered
  8 .1   Form of Tax Opinion of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP*
  10 .1   Employment Agreement as amended and restated by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and William J. McGurk, effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .2   Employment Agreement as amended and restated by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr., effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .3   Employment Agreement by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and Christopher E. Buchholz, effective June 7, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on June 13, 2006)
  10 .4   Change-in-Control and Restricted Covenant Agreement by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and John T. Lund, effective January 2, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .5   Employment Agreement as amended and restated by and among Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and Richard J. Trachimowicz, effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 11, 2009 (File No. 000-51239))
  10 .6   Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan of Rockville Bank as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on December 18, 2007)
  10 .7   Rockville Bank Officer Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2.3 to Rockville Financial, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on March 31, 2006)
  10 .8   Rockville Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. effective January 27, 2004.
  10 .9   First Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on December 18, 2007)
  10 .10   Executive Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement for Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. effective October 18, 1993.
  10 .11   Rockville Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as amended and restated effective December 31, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on December 18, 2007)
  10 .12   Rockville Financial, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix B in the Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A for Rockville Financial, Inc. filed on July 3, 2006)
  21 .1   Subsidiaries of Rockville Financial New, Inc. and Rockville Bank
  23 .1   Consent of Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP (contained in Opinions included as Exhibits 5 and 8)
  23 .2   Consent of Deloitte & Touche, LLP


Table of Contents

         
  23 .3   Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.
  23 .4   Consent of RP Financial, LC.
  24     Power of Attorney (set forth on signature page)
  99 .1   Appraisal Agreement between Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc., Rockville Bank and RP Financial, LC.
  99 .2   Business Plan Agreement between Rockville Bank and FinPro, Inc.
  99 .3   Appraisal Report of RP Financial, LC.**
  99 .4   Marketing Materials*
  99 .5   Stock Order and Certification Form*
  99 .6   Form of Proxy Card*
 
 
* To be filed at a later date.
 
** Supporting financial schedules filed in paper format only pursuant to Rule 202 of Regulation S-T. Available for inspection during business hours at the principal offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C.

Exhibit 1.1
(KBW LOGO)
July 20, 2010
Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
25 Park Street
Vernon Rockville, CT 06066
Attention:   William J. McGurk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Ladies and Gentlemen:
          This letter confirms the engagement of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“KBW”) to act as the exclusive financial advisor to Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., Rockville Financial, Inc., and Rockville Bank (collectively referred to herein as the “Bank”) in connection with the Bank’s proposed second-step conversion, pursuant to the Bank’s Plan of Conversion and Reorganization, whereby Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. and Rockville Financial, Inc. will convert and reorganize from the mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure (the “Conversion”) including the offer and sale of certain shares of the common stock (the “Common Stock”) of a new stock holding company (the “Holding Company”) to be formed by the Bank to eligible persons in a Subscription Offering, with any remaining shares offered to the general public in a Community Offering, and, possibly, a Syndicated Community Offering (the Subscription Offering the Community Offering and any Syndicated Community Offering are collectively referred to herein as the “Offerings”). In addition, KBW will act as Conversion Agent in connection with the Offerings pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement between the Bank and KBW. The Bank and the Holding Company are collectively referred to herein as the “Company”. This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of our engagement.
1. Advisory/Offering Services
As the Company’s financial advisor , KBW will provide financial advice to the Company and will assist the Company’s management, legal counsel, accountants and other advisors in connection with the Conversion and related issues. We anticipate our services will include the following, each as may be necessary and as the Company may reasonably request:
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods · 10 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 3400 · Chicago, IL 60606
312.423.8200 · Toll Free: 800.929.6113 · Fax: 312.423.8232

 


 

Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
July 20, 2010
Page 2 of 7
  1.   Provide advice on the financial and securities market implications of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization and any related corporate documents, including the Company’s Business Plan;
 
  2.   Assist in structuring the Offerings, including developing and assisting in implementing a marketing strategy for the Offerings;
 
  3.   Reviewing all offering documents, including the Prospectus, stock order forms, letters, brochures and other related offering materials (it being understood that preparation and filing of such documents will be the responsibility of the Company and its counsel);
 
  4.   Assisting the Company in preparing for and scheduling meetings with potential investors and broker-dealers, as necessary;
 
  5.   Assist the Company in analyzing proposals from outside vendors retained in connection with the Offerings, including printers, transfer agents and appraisal firms;
 
  6.   Assist the Company in the drafting and distribution of press releases as required or appropriate in connection with the Offerings;
 
  7.   Meet with the Board of Directors and/or management of the Company to discuss any of the above services; and
 
  8.   such other financial advisory and investment banking services in connection with the Offerings as may be agreed upon by KBW and the Company.
2. Due Diligence Review
     The Company acknowledges and agrees that KBW’s obligation to perform the services contemplated by this agreement shall be subject to the satisfactory completion of such investigations and inquiries relating to the Company, and its directors, officers, agents and employees, as KBW and its counsel in their sole discretion may deem appropriate under the circumstances. The Company agrees it will make available to KBW all relevant information, whether or not publicly available, which KBW reasonably requests, and will permit KBW to discuss with the board of directors and management the operations and prospects of the Company. The Company recognizes and confirms that KBW (a) will use and rely on such information in performing the services contemplated by this agreement without having independently verified the same, and (b) does not assume responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or to conduct any independent verification or any appraisal or physical inspection of properties or assets. KBW will assume that all financial forecasts have been reasonably prepared and reflect the best then currently available estimates and judgments of the Company’s management as to the expected future financial performance of the Company.
3. Regulatory Filings
     The Company will cause appropriate Offering documents to be filed with all regulatory agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), and the appropriate federal and/or state bank regulatory agencies. In addition, the Company and KBW agree that the Company’s counsel shall serve as counsel with respect to blue sky matters in

 


 

Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
July 20, 2010
Page 3 of 7
connection with the Offerings, and that the Company shall cause such counsel to prepare a Blue Sky Memorandum related to the Offerings including KBW’s participation therein and shall furnish KBW a copy thereof addressed to KBW or upon which counsel shall state KBW may rely.
4. Fees
For the services hereunder, the Company shall pay the following fees to KBW at closing unless stated otherwise:
  (a)   Management Fee: A Management Fee of $30,000 payable in four consecutive monthly installments of $7,500 commencing with the first month following the execution of this engagement letter. Such fees shall be deemed to have been earned when due. Should the Offerings be terminated for any reason not attributable to the action or inaction of KBW, KBW shall have earned and be entitled to be paid fees accruing through the stage at which point the termination occurred.
 
  (b)   Success Fee: A Success Fee of .75% shall be paid based on the aggregate Purchase Price of Common Stock sold in the Subscription Offering and Direct Community Offering, excluding shares purchased by the Company’s officers, directors, or employees (or members of their immediate family) plus any ESOP, tax-qualified or stock based compensation plans (except IRA’s) or similar plan created by the Company for some or all of their directors or employees, or any charitable foundation established by the Company (or any shares contributed to such a foundation). The Management Fee described in 4(a) will be credited against any Success Fee paid pursuant to this paragraph.
 
  (c)   Syndicated Community Offering : If any shares of the Company’s stock remain available after the Subscription Offering and Direct Community Offering, at the request of the Company, KBW will seek to form a syndicate of registered broker-dealers to assist in the sale of such common stock on a best efforts basis, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in a selected dealers agreement to be entered into between the Company and KBW. KBW will endeavor to distribute the common stock among dealers in a fashion which best meets the distribution objectives of the Company and the Plan. KBW will be paid a fee not to exceed 5.5% of the aggregate Purchase Price of the shares of common stock sold in the Syndicated Community Offering. From this fee, KBW will pass onto selected broker-dealers, who assist in the syndicated community, an amount competitive with gross underwriting discounts charged at such time for comparable amounts of stock sold at a comparable price per share in a similar market environment. Fees with respect to purchases affected with the assistance of a broker/dealer other than KBW shall be transmitted by KBW to such broker/dealer.

 


 

Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
July 20, 2010
Page 4 of 7
5. Expenses
     The Company will bear those expenses of the proposed Offerings customarily borne by issuers, including, without limitation, regulatory filing fees, SEC, “Blue Sky,”, FINRA filing and registration fees, and DTC eligibility fees; the fees of the Company’s accountants, attorneys, appraiser, transfer agent and registrar, printing, mailing and marketing and syndicate expenses associated with the Offerings; the fees set forth in Section 4; and fees for “Blue Sky” legal work. If KBW incurs expenses on behalf of Company, the Company will reimburse KBW for such expenses.
     KBW shall be reimbursed for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to the Offerings, including costs of travel, meals and lodging, photocopying, telephone, facsimile, and couriers, which will not exceed $50,000. KBW will also be reimbursed for fees and expenses of its counsel not to exceed $100,000. These expenses assume no unusual circumstances or delays, or a re-solicitation in connection with the Offerings. KBW and the Company acknowledge that such expense cap may be increased by mutual consent, including in the event of a material delay in the Offerings which would require an update of the financial information in tabular form to reflect a period later than that set forth in the original filing of the offering document. The provisions of this paragraph are not intended to apply to or in any way impair or limit the indemnification provisions contained herein.
6. Limitations
     The Company acknowledges that all opinions and advice (written or oral) given by KBW to the Company in connection with KBW’s engagement are intended solely for the benefit and use of the Company for the purposes of its evaluation of the proposed Offerings. Unless otherwise expressly stated in an opinion letter issued by KBW or otherwise expressly agreed, no one other than the Company is authorized to rely upon this engagement of KBW or any statements or conduct by KBW. The Company agrees that no such opinion or advice shall be used, reproduced, disseminated, quoted or referred to at any time, in any manner, or for any purpose, nor shall any public references to KBW be made by the Company or any of its representatives without the prior written consent of KBW.
     The Company acknowledges and agrees that KBW has been retained to act solely as financial advisor to the Company and not as an advisor to or agent of any other person, and the Company’s engagement of KBW is not intended to confer rights upon any person not a party to this Agreement (including shareholders, employees or creditors of the Company) as against KBW or its affiliates, or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents. In such capacity, KBW shall act as an independent contractor, and any duties arising out of its engagement shall be owed solely to the Company. It is understood that KBW’s responsibility to the Company is solely contractual in nature and KBW does not owe the Company, or any other party, any fiduciary duty as a result of this Agreement.

 


 

Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
July 20, 2010
Page 5 of 7
7. Benefit
     This letter agreement shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors, and the obligations and liabilities assumed hereunder by the parties hereto shall be binding upon their respective successors; provided, however, that this letter agreement shall not be assignable by KBW.
8. Confidentiality
     KBW acknowledges that a portion of the Information may contain confidential and proprietary business information concerning the Company. KBW agrees that, except as contemplated in connection with the performance of its services under this agreement, as authorized by the Company or as required by law, regulation or legal process, KBW agrees that it will treat as confidential all material, non-public information relating to the Company obtained in connection with its engagement hereunder (the “Confidential Information); provided, however, that KBW may disclose such Confidential Information to its agents and advisors who are assisting or advising KBW in performing its services hereunder and who have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of this paragraph. As used in this paragraph, the term “Confidential Information” shall not include information which (a) is or becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of a disclosure by KBW, (b) was available to KBW on a non-confidential basis prior to its disclosure to KBW by the Company, or (c) becomes available to KBW on a non-confidential basis from a person other than the Company who is not otherwise known to KBW to be bound not to disclose such information pursuant to a contractual, legal or fiduciary obligation.
     The Company hereby acknowledges and agrees that the presentation materials and financial models used by KBW in performing its services hereunder have been developed by and are proprietary to KBW. The Company agrees that it will not reproduce or distribute all or any portion of such models or presentations without the prior consent from KBW in writing.
9. Indemnification
     As KBW will be acting on behalf of the Company in connection with the Offerings, the Company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless KBW and its affiliates, the respective partners, directors, officers, employees and agents of KBW and its affiliates and each other person, if any, controlling KBW or any of its affiliates and each of their successors and assigns (KBW and each such person being an “Indemnified Party”) to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities, joint or several, to which such Indemnified Party may become subject under applicable federal or state law, or otherwise related to or arising out of the Offerings or the engagement of KBW pursuant to, or the performance by KBW of the services contemplated by, this letter, and will reimburse any Indemnified Party for all expenses (including legal fees and expenses) as they are incurred, including expenses incurred in connection with the investigation, preparing for or defending any such action or claim whether or not in connection with pending or threatened litigation, or any action or proceeding arising therefrom, whether or not KBW is a party; provided, however, that the Company will not be liable in any

 


 

Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
July 20, 2010
Page 6 of 7
such case to the extent that any such loss, claim, damage, liability or expense (a) arises out of or is based upon any untrue statement of a material fact or the omission of a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make not misleading any statements contained in any final prospectus, or any amendment or supplement thereto, made in reliance on and in conformity with written information furnished to the Company by KBW expressly for use therein or (b) to the extent that any loss, claim, damage, liability or expense is found in a final judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted primarily from KBW’s gross negligence or bad faith.
     If the indemnification provided for in the foregoing paragraph is judicially determined to be unavailable (other than in accordance with the terms hereof) to any person otherwise entitled to indemnity in respect of any losses, claims, damages or liabilities referred to herein, then, in lieu of indemnifying such person hereunder, the Company shall contribute to the amount paid or payable by such person as a result of such losses, claims, damages or liabilities (and expenses relating thereto) (i) in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect the relative benefits to the Company, on the one hand, and KBW, on the other hand, of the engagement provided for in this Agreement or (ii) if the allocation provided for in clause (i) above is not available, in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect not only the relative benefits referred to in such clause (i) but also the relative fault of each of the Company and KBW, as well as any other relevant equitable considerations; provided, however , in no event shall KBW’s aggregate contribution to the amount paid or payable exceed the aggregate amount of fees actually received by KBW under this Agreement. For the purposes of this Agreement, the relative benefits to the Company and to KBW of the engagement under this Agreement shall be deemed to be in the same proportion as (a) the total value paid or contemplated to be paid or received or contemplated to be received by the Company in the Conversion and the Offerings that are the subject of the engagement hereunder, whether or not consummated, bears to (b) the fees paid or to be paid to KBW under this Agreement.
10. Definitive Agreement
     This letter agreement reflects KBW’s present intention of proceeding to work with the Company on its proposed Offerings. No legal and binding obligation is created on the part of the Company or KBW with respect to the subject matter hereof, except as to (i) the agreement to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information set forth in Section 8, (ii) the payment of certain fees as set forth in Section 4, (iii) the payment of expenses as set forth in Section 5, (iv) the limitations set forth in Section 6, (v) the indemnification and contribution provisions set forth in Section 9 and (iv) those terms set forth in a mutually agreed upon Agency Agreement between KBW and the Company to be executed prior to commencement of the Offerings, all of which shall constitute the binding obligations of the parties hereto and which shall survive the termination of this letter agreement or the completion of the services furnished hereunder and shall remain operative and in full force and effect.
     KBW’s execution of such Agency Agreement shall also be subject to (a) KBW’s satisfaction with Due Diligence Review, (b) preparation of offering materials that are satisfactory to KBW, (c) compliance

 


 

Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
July 20, 2010
Page 7 of 7
with all relevant legal and regulatory requirements to the reasonable satisfaction of KBW and its counsel, (d) agreement that the price established by the independent appraiser is reasonable, and (e) market conditions at the time of the proposed Offerings.
     This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and can be altered only by written consent signed by the parties. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of laws principles thereof. Any right to trial by jury with respect to any claim or action arising out of this agreement or conduct in connection with the engagement is hereby waived by the parties hereto.
     If the foregoing correctly sets forth our mutual understanding, please so indicate by signing and returning the original copy of this letter to the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
KEEFE, BRUYETTE & WOODS, INC.
             
By:
  /s/ Patricia A. McJoynt        
 
           
 
  Patricia A. McJoynt        
 
  Managing Director        
 
           
Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
       
 
           
By:
      Date:    
 
           
 
  William J. McGurk        
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer        

 

Exhibit 2.1
PLAN OF CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION
of
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL MHC, INC.,
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
and
ROCKVILLE BANK

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
             
        PAGE  
1.
  Introduction     1  
 
           
2.
  Definitions     2  
 
           
3.
  General Procedure for Conversion and Reorganization     8  
 
           
4.
  Total Number of Shares and Purchase Price of Conversion Stock     10  
 
           
5.
  Subscription Rights of Eligible Account Holders (First Priority)     10  
 
           
6.
  Subscription Rights of Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans (Second Priority)     11  
 
           
7.
  Subscription Rights of Supplemental Eligible Account Holders (Third Priority)     12  
 
           
8.
  Community Offering, Syndicated Community Offering, Public Offering and Other Offerings     12  
 
           
9.
  Limitations on Subscriptions and Purchases of Conversion Stock     14  
 
           
10.
  Timing of Subscription Offering; Manner of Exercising Subscription Rights and Order Forms     15  
 
           
11.
  Payment for Conversion Stock     17  
 
           
12.
  Expiration of Subscription Rights; Undelivered, Defective or Late Order Forms; Insufficient Payment     18  
 
           
13.
  Participants in Nonqualified Jurisdictions or Foreign Countries     19  
 
           
14.
  Voting Rights of Shareholders     19  
 
           
15.
  Liquidation Account     19  
 
           
16.
  Transfer of Deposit Accounts     20  
 
           
17.
  Requirements Following the Conversion and Reorganization for Registration, Market Making and Stock Exchange Listing     21  
 
           
18.
  Restriction on Transfer of Conversion Stock by Officers and Directors     21  
 
           
19.
  Restriction on Acquisitions of Conversion Stock     21  
 
           
20.
  Stock Compensation Plans     22  
 
           
21.
  Dividend and Repurchase Restrictions on Stock     22  
 
           
22.
  Effective Date     23  
 
           
23.
  Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws     23  
 
           
24.
  Contribution to the Foundation     23  
 
           
25.
  Amendment or Termination of the Plan     24  
 
           
26.
  Interpretation of the Plan     24  

 


 

1.   INTRODUCTION.
     This Plan of Conversion and Reorganization (the “Plan”) provides for the Conversion and Reorganization of Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., a Connecticut-chartered mutual holding company (the “MHC”), into the stock holding company form of organization. The MHC currently owns a majority of the common stock of Rockville Financial, Inc., a Connecticut-chartered stock holding company (the “Mid-Tier Holding Company”), which owns 100.0% of the common stock of Rockville Bank, a Connecticut-chartered stock bank (the “Bank”). In 2005, the Bank and the MHC reorganized into a two-tier mutual holding company structure by creating Rockville Financial, Inc. as a mid-tier holding company. As part of the 2005 reorganization, the Bank became the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Mid-Tier Holding Company issued a minority of its common stock to the public, with the majority of such stock being retained by the MHC. As of the date hereof, the MHC beneficially owns approximately 56.7% of the outstanding voting stock of the Mid-Tier Holding Company, and the remaining shares are owned by Persons other than the MHC.
     The purpose of the Conversion and Reorganization is to provide the Bank with additional capital to take advantage of potential growth and strategic opportunities, to support the Bank’s continued planned growth and to successfully implement the Bank’s business strategy. In addition, the Boards of Directors believe that the conversion is a necessary and appropriate response to the changing market and regulatory conditions. The Conversion and Reorganization, which has been structured as a tax-free reorganization, will allow the Bank to continue to compete effectively in the changing financial services marketplace. The shareholders of the new holding company will also benefit from the more active and liquid trading market that will exist when the Bank’s holding company is 100.0% publicly owned.
     The Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank, after careful study and consideration, adopted this Plan on September 16, 2010. The Boards of Directors determined that this Plan equitably provides for the interests of Depositors through the granting of subscription rights and the establishment of a Liquidation Account. In addition, in adopting the Plan, the Boards of Directors considered the following: (i) the potential implications for the mutual holding company structure as a result of changing regulatory conditions; (ii) the declining number of mutual holding companies operating in the United States and the political importance of such companies; (iii) the historic emphasis on the Bank being an important and relevant source of banking services to the communities it serves and the need for a strong capital base to provide those services; (iv) the historic emphasis on the Bank remaining independent and the belief that such independence can be preserved by enhancing capital and operating as a successful public company; (v) the benefits to the large retail and shareholder population in the Bank’s communities; (vi) the alternatives for raising capital and continuing business in the mutual holding company structure; (vii) the long and short term interests of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank, the Mid-Tier Holding Company’s shareholders, and the employees, customers, creditors and suppliers of the Bank; and (viii) other community and societal considerations.
     As described in more detail in Section 3, the MHC will convert from a Connecticut-chartered mutual holding company to a Connecticut-chartered stock holding company through a series of substantially simultaneous mergers pursuant to which (i) the MHC will cease to exist and a liquidation account will be established by the Holding Company for the benefit of the Depositors for a 10-year period and (ii) the Bank will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the new Rockville Financial, Inc. (the “Holding Company” and organized with the name “Rockville Financial New, Inc.”). Each share of Mid-Tier Holding Company Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Mid-Tier Holding Company Merger shall be automatically converted into the right to receive

1


 

shares of the Conversion Stock based on the Exchange Ratio, plus cash in lieu of any fractional share interest. Immediately thereafter, the Holding Company will complete the offering of shares of Conversion Stock in the Offerings as provided in this Plan.
     Shares of Conversion Stock will be offered in a Subscription Offering in descending order of priority to (i) Eligible Account Holders, (ii) Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans and (iii) Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. Any shares of Conversion Stock not subscribed for by the foregoing classes of Persons will be offered for sale to certain members of the public through a Community Offering, a Syndicated Community Offering or a Public Offering or through a combination of such Offerings.
     In addition, as further described in Section 24, in furtherance of the Bank’s commitment to its community, this Plan provides for the additional funding of the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. The Holding Company intends to make a cash contribution to the Foundation from the proceeds of the Offerings. The amount to be contributed shall equal 3.0% of the net proceeds from the Offerings.
     In addition to having been approved by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Holding Company and the Bank, this Plan must be approved by at least (i) 80.0% of the total voting power of the Corporators eligible to vote, which total voting power shall not be less than 25 Corporators, (ii) a majority of Independent Corporators, who shall constitute not less than 60.0% of the total voting power of the Corporators, (iii) a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast by Shareholders, and (iv) a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by Minority Shareholders. The Conversion and Reorganization must be approved by the Commissioner and the FDIC, if applicable. The Bank must also receive final approval from the FRB to allow the Holding Company to become a bank holding company and own 100.0% of the Bank’s capital stock.
     Upon consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization, the Bank will continue to be regulated by the Department of Banking, as its chartering authority, and by the FDIC. The Holding Company will be regulated by the Department of Banking and the FRB. In addition, the Bank will continue to be a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System and all insured savings deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC up the maximum limit provided by law.
2.   DEFINITIONS.
     As used in this Plan, the terms set forth below have the following meanings:
      ACTING IN CONCERT means (i) knowing participation in a joint activity or independent conscious parallel action towards a common goal whether or not pursuant to an express agreement, or (ii) a combination or pooling of voting or other interests in the securities of an issuer for a common purpose pursuant to any contract, understanding, relationship, agreement or other arrangement, whether written or otherwise. A Person that acts in concert with another Person shall also be deemed to be acting in concert with any Person that is also acting in concert with that other Person, except that any Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan shall not be deemed to be acting in concert with its trustee or a person that serves in a similar capacity solely for the purpose of determining whether stock held by the trustee and stock held by the plan will be aggregated. The determination of whether a group is Acting in Concert shall be made by the Board of Directors of the Holding Company or Officers delegated by such Board of Directors in accordance with Connecticut law and may be based on any evidence upon which the Board of Directors or such delegate chooses to rely, including, without limitation, joint account relationships or the fact that such Persons share a common address (whether or not related by blood or marriage) or have filed

2


 

Joint 13D or Schedules 13G with the SEC with respect to other companies. Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Holding Company and the Bank shall not be deemed to be Acting in Concert solely as a result of their membership on any such board or boards.
      AFFILIATE means a Person that directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Person specified.
      APPLICATION means the application, including a copy of the Plan, submitted to the Commissioner for approval of the Conversion and Reorganization.
      ASSOCIATE , when used to indicate a relationship with any Person, means (i) a corporation or organization (other than the MHC, Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank or the Holding Company, or a majority-owned subsidiary of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Holding Company or the Bank) if the person is an officer or partner or beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10.0% or more of any class of equity securities of the corporation or organization; (ii) a trust or other estate if the Person has a substantial beneficial interest in the trust or estate or is a trustee or fiduciary of the trust or estate, provided, however, that such term does not include any Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Holding Company or the Bank in which such Person has a substantial beneficial interest or serves as a trustee or a fiduciary; and (iii) any Person who is related by blood or marriage to such person and who lives in the same home as such person, or who is a Director or senior Officer of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Holding Company, the Bank or any of their subsidiaries.
      BANK means Rockville Bank, a stock bank organized under the laws of Connecticut.
      BANK BENEFIT PLAN(S) includes, but is not limited to, Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans and Non-Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans.
      BANK COMMON STOCK means the common stock of the Bank, par value $0.01 per share, which stock is not and will not be insured by the FDIC or other governmental authority, all of which is currently held by the Mid-Tier Holding Company and subsequent to the Conversion and Reorganization, all of which will be held by the Holding Company.
      CODE means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
      COMMISSIONER means the Banking Commissioner of the State of Connecticut.
      CONTROL (including the terms “controlling,” “controlled by” and “under common control with”) means the direct or indirect power to direct or exercise a controlling influence over the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
      CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION means the series of transactions provided for in this Plan, including but not limited to the MHC Merger and the Mid-Tier Merger. All such transactions shall occur substantially simultaneously.
      CONVERSION STOCK means the Holding Company Common Stock to be issued and sold in the Offerings pursuant to the Plan.
      CORPORATOR means a Person qualifying as a corporator of the MHC in accordance

3


 

with the MHC’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the laws of the State of Connecticut.
      CORPORATORS’ MEETING means a special meeting of the Corporators called for the purpose of submitting this Plan to the Corporators for their approval.
      DEPARTMENT OF BANKING means the State of Connecticut Department of Banking.
      DEPOSIT ACCOUNT means an account maintained at the Bank into which deposits may be made.
      DEPOSITOR means any person who is legally entitled to withdraw funds from a Deposit Account.
      DIRECTOR refers to the directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, Bank or the Holding Company, as indicated by the context.
      ELIGIBLE ACCOUNT HOLDER means any Person holding a Qualifying Deposit on the Eligibility Record Date for purposes of determining Subscription Rights and establishing subaccount balances in the Liquidation Account.
      ELIGIBILITY RECORD DATE means the date for determining Eligible Account Holders and is the close of business on June 30, 2009.
      ESOP means the Rockville Employee Stock Ownership Plan or such other Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan adopted by the Holding Company or the Bank in connection with the Conversion and Reorganization, the purpose of which shall be to hold Holding Company Common Stock.
      ESTIMATED PRICE RANGE means the range of the estimated aggregate pro forma market value of the total number of shares of Conversion Stock to be issued in the Offerings, as determined by the Independent Appraiser in accordance with Section 4 hereof.
      EXCHANGE RATIO means the rate at which shares of the Holding Company Common Stock will be issued in exchange for shares of the Mid-Tier Holding Company Common Stock held by the Minority Shareholders in connection with the Mid-Tier Holding Company Merger. The exact rate (which shall be rounded down to four decimal places) shall be determined by the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank in order to ensure, subject to adjustment, that upon consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization the Minority Shareholders will own in the aggregate approximately the same percentage of the Holding Company Common Stock to be outstanding upon completion of the Conversion and Reorganization as the percentage of the Mid-Tier Holding Company Common Stock owned by them in the aggregate immediately prior to consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization, before giving effect to (a) cash paid in lieu of any fractional interests of the Holding Company Common Stock and (b) any shares of Conversion Stock purchased by the Minority Shareholders in the Offerings. However, in accordance with the policies of the FDIC and the FRB, the exchange ratio must be adjusted downward to reflect the aggregate amount of Existing Rockville Financial dividends paid to Rockville Financial MHC and the initial capitalization of Rockville Financial MHC. The Minority Shareholders will experience a dilution in ownership interest from a 43.30% current ownership interest in the Mid-Tier Holding Company to an approximately 41.81% interest in the Holding Company.
      EXCHANGE SHARES mean the shares of Holding Company Common Stock to be issued

4


 

to the Minority Shareholders in connection with the Mid-Tier Holding Company Merger.
      FDIC means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any successor thereto.
      FOUNDATION means the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc.
      FRB means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any successor thereto.
      FRB APPLICATION means the application to be submitted to the FRB seeking the FRB’s prior approval to allow the Holding Company to become a bank holding company and own 100% of the Bank’s capital stock.
      HOLDING COMPANY means Rockville Financial New, Inc. the stock corporation to be organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut. Upon completion of the Conversion and Reorganization, the Holding Company shall hold all of the outstanding capital stock of the Bank.
      HOLDING COMPANY COMMON STOCK means the common stock of the Holding Company, no par value per share, which stock is not and will not be insured by the FDIC or any other governmental authority.
      INDEPENDENT APPRAISER means the independent investment banking or financial consulting firm retained by the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank to prepare an appraisal of the estimated pro forma market value of the Conversion Stock.
      INDEPENDENT CORPORATOR means a Corporator who is not an employee, officer, director, trustee or significant borrower of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company or the Bank.
      LIQUIDATION ACCOUNT means the account that represents the potential interest of the Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders in exchange for their interest in the MHC in connection with the Conversion and Reorganization, as described in Section 15.
      LOCAL COMMUNITY means (i) all towns, cities and counties in which the Bank has offices, (ii) each such town’s, city’s or county’s metropolitan statistical area, and (iii) all zip code areas in the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act assessment area.
      MANAGEMENT PERSON means any Officer or Director of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank or the Holding Company or any Affiliate of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank or the Holding Company and any person Acting in Concert with such Officer or Director.
      MARKET MAKER means a securities dealer who (i) regularly publishes bona fide competitive bid and offer quotations for the Holding Company Common Stock in a recognized inter-dealer quotation system, (ii) furnishes bona fide competitive bid and offer quotations for the Holding Company Common Stock on request, or (iii) may effect transactions for the Holding Company Common Stock in reasonable quantities at quoted prices with other brokers or dealers.
      MHC means Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., a mutual holding company organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut.
      MHC MERGER means the merger of the MHC with and into the Mid-Tier Holding

5


 

Company pursuant to the Plan of Merger included as Annex A hereto.
      MID-TIER HOLDING COMPANY means Rockville Financial, Inc., an existing stock corporation organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut.
      MID-TIER HOLDING COMPANY MERGER means the merger of the Mid-Tier Holding Company with and into the Holding Company pursuant to the Plan of Merger included as Annex B hereto.
      MID-TIER HOLDING COMPANY COMMON STOCK means the shares of common stock, no par value per share, of the Mid-Tier Holding Company, which stock is not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental authority.
      MINORITY SHAREHOLDER means any owner of Minority Shares.
      MINORITY SHARES means any issued and outstanding common stock of the Mid-Tier Holding Company owned by Persons other than the MHC.
      OFFERINGS mean the offering of Conversion Stock to Persons in the Subscription Offering, the Community Offering, the Syndicated Community Offering and/or Public Offering.
      OFFICER means the chairman of the board of directors, president, chief executive officer, vice-president, secretary, treasurer or principal financial officer, comptroller or principal accounting officer and any other person performing similar functions of any organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated, and any person who has been designated as an officer by the governing board of such organization.
      ORDER FORM means the form or forms to be provided by the Holding Company, containing all such terms and provisions as set forth in Section 10 hereof, to a Participant or other Person by which Conversion Stock may be ordered in the Offerings.
      PARTICIPANT means any Eligible Account Holder, Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan, Supplemental Eligible Account Holder, or Director, Officer, employee or Corporator of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company or the Bank, as applicable.
      PERSON means an individual, company, including any corporation, joint stock company, trust, association, partnership, limited partnership, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or similar organization, or any other legal entity, including a federal, state or municipal government or agency or any political subdivision thereof.
      PLAN OF CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION means this Plan of Conversion and Reorganization as adopted by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank and any amendment hereto as provided herein. The Board of Directors of the Holding Company shall adopt this Plan as soon as practical following its organization.
      PRIMARY PARTIES means the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank and the Holding Company.
      PROSPECTUS means the one or more documents to be used in offering the Conversion Stock in the Offerings.

6


 

      PROXY SOLICITATION MATERIALS includes a proxy statement, form of proxy or other written or oral communication regarding the Conversion and Reorganization.
      PUBLIC OFFERING means the offering for sale by the Underwriters to the general public of any shares of Holding Company Common Stock not subscribed for in the Subscription Offering, the Community Offering or any Syndicated Community Offering.
      PURCHASE PRICE means the price per share at which the Conversion Stock is sold by the Holding Company in the Offerings in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
      QUALIFYING DEPOSIT means the aggregate balance of all Deposit Accounts of (i) an Eligible Account Holder at the close of business on the Eligibility Record Date, provided such aggregate balance is not less than $50.00, and (ii) a Supplemental Account Holder at the close of business on the Supplemental Eligibility Record Date, provided such aggregate balance is not less than $50.00.
      SEC means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
      SHAREHOLDERS means those Persons who own capital stock of the Mid-Tier Holding Company.
      SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING means the meeting of the Shareholders of the Mid-Tier Holding Company called for the purpose of approving the Conversion and Reorganization.
      SUBSCRIPTION OFFERING means the offering of the shares of Conversion Stock through nontransferable subscription rights for purchase by Participants, under Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Plan.
      SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS mean nontransferable subscription rights distributed without payment to Participants pursuant to the terms of the Plan.
      SUPPLEMENTAL ELIGIBLE ACCOUNT HOLDER means any Person (other than Directors and Officers of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank or their Associates), holding a Qualifying Deposit at the close of business on the Supplemental Eligibility Record Date.
      SUPPLEMENTAL ELIGIBILITY RECORD DATE means the date for determining the Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, which date is the last day of the calendar quarter preceding the Commissioner’s approval of the Conversion and Reorganization and will only occur if the Commissioner has not approved the Conversion and Reorganization within 15 months of the Eligibility Record Date.
      SYNDICATED COMMUNITY OFFERING means the offering for sale by a syndicate of broker-dealers to the general public of shares of Conversion Stock not purchased in the Subscription Offering and the Community Offering.
      TAX-QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK BENEFIT PLAN is any defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan, such as an employee stock ownership plan, stock bonus plan, profit sharing or other plan and which, with its related trust, is “qualified” under section 401 of the Code as from time to time in effect. A “Non-Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan” is any defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan which is not so qualified.

7


 

      UNDERWRITER means any person who has purchased from the Holding Company with a view to, or offers to sell for the Holding Company in connection with, the distribution of any security, or participates or has a direct or indirect participation in the direct or indirect underwriting of any such undertaking, but such term shall not include a person whose interest is limited to a commission from an underwriter or dealer not in excess of the usual and customary distributors’ or sellers’ commission.
3.   GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION.
     (a) It is anticipated that the Conversion and Reorganization will be effected in accordance with the steps set forth below, provided, however, that it may be effected in any other manner approved by the Department of Banking that is consistent with the purposes of this Plan and applicable laws and regulations.
          (i) The Holding Company shall be organized as a first-tier subsidiary of the Mid-Tier Holding Company.
          (ii) The MHC shall merge with and into the Mid-Tier Holding Company with the Mid-Tier Holding Company as the surviving entity pursuant to the Plan of Merger included as Annex A hereto, whereby the shares of the Mid-Tier Holding Company Common Stock held by the MHC immediately prior to the MHC Merger will be extinguished and the Depositors will constructively receive liquidation interests in the Mid-Tier Holding Company in exchange for their interests in the MHC.
          (iii) Immediately thereafter, the Mid-Tier Holding Company shall merge with and into the Holding Company, with the Holding Company as the surviving entity, pursuant to the Plan of Merger included as Annex B hereto, whereby the Bank will become the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Holding Company and the liquidation interests constructively received by the Depositors in the MHC merger will automatically, without further action on the part of such Depositors, be exchanged for an interest in the Liquidation Account. In addition, each Minority Share shall automatically, without further action on the part of the Minority Shareholders, be converted into and become the right to receive Holding Company Common Stock based on the Exchange Ratio plus cash in lieu of any fractional share interest. The basis for exchange of Minority Shares for Holding Company Common Stock shall be fair and reasonable.
          (iv) Immediately thereafter, the Holding Company will consummate the sale of the Conversion Stock in the Offerings. Shares of Conversion Stock will be offered in a Subscription Offering in descending order of priority to (i) Eligible Account Holders, (ii) Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans and (iii) Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, if any. Any shares of Conversion Stock not subscribed for by the foregoing classes of Persons will be offered for sale to certain members of the public through a Community Offering, a Syndicated Community Offering or a Public Offering or through a combination of such Offerings.
          (v) The Holding Company will contribute at least 50.0% of the net proceeds of the Offering to the Bank in a constructive exchange for additional shares of common stock of the Bank and in exchange for the Liquidation Account.
     (b) The Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank have adopted this Plan and shall seek the approval of the Corporators. The Bank shall provide all Corporators with notice of the Corporators’ Meeting and informational material regarding the Plan at least 10 days prior to the Corporators’ Meeting. At the Corporators’ Meeting, the Plan must be

8


 

approved by the affirmative vote of at least (i) 80.0% of the total voting power of the Corporators eligible to vote, which total voting power shall not be less than 25 Corporators, and (ii) a majority of Independent Corporators who shall constitute not less than 60.0% of the total voting power of the Corporators. Following the Corporators’ Meeting, the MHC shall file with the Commissioner a certificate of the Secretary of the MHC that the Corporators’ Meeting was held and that the Plan was duly approved by the Corporators in accordance with the voting requirements stated in this Plan. In addition, the Bank plans to notify Depositors, in accordance with applicable regulations, that the Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank adopted the Plan and that a copy of the Plan is available for inspection at the Bank’s main office and branches.
     (c) Following receipt of requisite approval of the Conversion and Reorganization by the Commissioner, the Holding Company and the Bank will mail to Participants a Prospectus and Order Form for the purchase of Conversion Stock in the Offerings. In addition, the Mid-Tier Holding Company will file a preliminary Prospectus and Proxy Solicitation Materials with the SEC, the Commissioner and the FDIC, as required, in order to seek the Shareholders’ approval of the Conversion and Reorganization at the Shareholders’ Meeting. Following the Mid-Tier Holding Company’s receipt of requisite approval and the Banking Commissioner declaring the Prospectus and Proxy Solicitation Materials effective, it will mail definitive Proxy Solicitation Materials to Shareholders in accordance with the Mid-Tier Holding Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable law. At the Shareholders’ Meeting, the Plan must be approved by at least (i) a majority of voting power of all issued and outstanding shares of capital stock and (ii) a majority of voting power of all Minority Shares.
     (d) The Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank will take all necessary steps to complete the Conversion and Reorganization, including filing timely applications and other materials for approval with the Commissioner, the FRB, the FDIC and the SEC, as necessary. In addition, if necessary, the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank will seek a waiver from the FDIC of any requirement that Depositors vote to approve the Plan. The MHC must also receive a tax ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion from its counsel as to the tax consequences of the Conversion and Reorganization, providing in part that the Conversion and Reorganization will not result in a taxable reorganization of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company or the Bank under the Code. All notices regarding the filing of the applications will be published as required.
     (e) The Board of Directors of the Bank intends to take all necessary steps to form the Holding Company, including the filing of any necessary applications to the appropriate regulatory authorities that will govern the activities of the Holding Company. Upon consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization, the Bank will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Holding Company and the initial Directors of the Holding Company will be the Directors of the Bank and the Mid-Tier Holding Company. The Holding Company will issue and sell the Conversion Stock in accordance with this Plan and make timely applications for any requisite regulatory approvals, including an application to register as a bank holding company, and the filing of a registration statement to register the sale of the shares of Conversion Stock with the SEC.
     (f) The Holding Company may retain and pay for the services of financial and other advisors and investment bankers to assist in connection with any or all aspects of the Offerings, including the payment of fees to brokers for assisting Persons in completing and/or submitting Order Forms. The Holding Company shall use its best efforts to ensure that all fees, expenses, retainers and similar items are reasonable.

9


 

4.   TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES AND PURCHASE PRICE OF CONVERSION STOCK.
     (a) An Independent Appraiser shall be employed by the Primary Parties to provide an independent valuation of the estimated pro forma market value of the Conversion Stock to be issued in the Conversion and Reorganization, as required by applicable regulations. The Boards of Directors of the Primary Parties shall thoroughly review and analyze the methodology and fairness of the independent appraisal. The valuation will be made by a written report to the Primary Parties, contain the factors upon which the valuation was made and conform to procedures adopted by the Commissioner and the FDIC. The valuation shall contain an Estimated Price Range reflecting the anticipated pro forma market value of the Conversion Stock to be issued in the Conversion and Reorganization. The maximum and minimum aggregate Purchase Price shall not be more than 15.0% above or 15.0% below, respectively, the midpoint of the Estimated Price Range.
     (b) The total number of shares (and the range thereof) of Conversion Stock that will be sold in connection with the Conversion and Reorganization will be determined by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank and the Holding Company immediately prior to the commencement of the Subscription Offering; provided, however, that the Boards of Directors may elect to increase or decrease the number of shares of Conversion Stock to be offered in the Offerings in the event of a demand for the Holding Company Common Stock or changes in market and financial conditions, with the approval of the Commissioner. If deemed appropriate, the Commissioner may condition its approval by requiring a resolicitation of subscribers. In particular, if the Estimated Price Range is increased to reflect changes in market and financial conditions after the close of the Subscription Offering and prior to the completion of the Offering, the total number of shares of Conversion Stock offered may be increased by up to 15.0%, so long as the aggregate Purchase Price is not more than 15.0% above the maximum of the Estimated Price Range.
     (c) All shares of Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings shall be sold at a uniform price per share, which when multiplied by the number of shares of Conversion Stock shall be equivalent to the pro forma market value of the Conversion Stock to be issued in the Conversion and Reorganization in accordance with the valuation furnished by the Independent Appraiser. At the close of the Subscription Offering, the Independent Appraiser shall present a valuation of the pro forma market value of the Conversion Stock to be issued in the Conversion. The aggregate Purchase Price of the Conversion Stock shall be adjusted to reflect any required changes in the Estimated Price Range. If, as a result of such adjustment, the Aggregate Purchase Price is more than 15.0% above the maximum of the Estimated Price Range, the Bank shall obtain an amendment to the Commissioner’s approval. If deemed appropriate, the Commissioner may condition their approval or non-objection by requiring a resolicitation of subscribers. The adjusted price per share for each share of Conversion Stock when multiplied by the number of shares of Conversion Stock shall be equivalent to the pro forma market value of the Conversion Stock to be issued in the Conversion and Reorganization in accordance with the valuation furnished by the Independent Appraiser.
5.   SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS OF ELIGIBLE ACCOUNT HOLDERS (FIRST PRIORITY).
     (a) Each Eligible Account Holder shall receive, as first priority and without payment, non-transferable Subscription Rights to purchase up to the greater of (i) 5.0% of the Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings (or such maximum purchase limitation established for the Community, Syndicated or Public Offerings), (ii) one-tenth of 1.0% of the number of shares of Conversion Stock issued in the Offerings, or (iii) 15 times the product (rounded down to the next whole number)

10


 

obtained by multiplying the number of the shares of Conversion Stock that will be issued in the Offerings by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of the Eligible Account Holder and the denominator of which is the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of all Eligible Account Holders.
     (b) In the event of an oversubscription for shares of Conversion Stock by Eligible Account Holders pursuant to paragraph 5(a), the Conversion Stock available for purchase will be allocated among the subscribing Eligible Account Holders so as to permit each subscribing Eligible Account Holder, to the extent possible, to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make his/her total allocation of Conversion Stock equal to the lesser of 100 shares or the number of shares subscribed for by such Eligible Account Holder. Any shares of Conversion Stock remaining after such allocation will be allocated among the subscribing Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied in the proportion that the amount of each such Eligible Account Holder’s Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of all Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied. If the amount so allocated exceeds the amount subscribed for by any one or more Eligible Account Holders, the excess shall be reallocated on the same principle (one or more times as necessary) among those Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions are still not fully satisfied, until all available shares of Conversion Stock have been allocated or all subscriptions have been satisfied.
     (c) Subscription Rights held by Eligible Account Holders who are also Directors or Officers of the Primary Parties or such Directors’ or Officers’ Associates will be subordinated to the Subscription Rights of other Eligible Account Holders to the extent such Subscription Rights are attributable to increased deposits during the one-year period preceding the Eligibility Record Date.
6.   SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS OF TAX-QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK BENEFIT PLANS (SECOND PRIORITY).
     (a) Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans shall receive without payment, as a second priority after the satisfaction of the subscriptions of Eligible Account Holders, non-transferable Subscription Rights to purchase up to 10.0% of the shares of Conversion Stock offered for sale in the Offerings, including any shares of Conversion Stock to be issued as a result of an increase in the Conversion Stock valuation range approved by the Commissioner. If, after the satisfaction of the subscriptions of Eligible Account Holders, a sufficient number of shares of Conversion Stock are not available to fill the subscriptions by such Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans, the subscriptions shall be filled to the maximum extent possible. If all of the shares of Conversion Stock offered in the Subscription Offering are purchased by Eligible Account Holders, then the Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans may purchase shares in the open market following consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization or may purchase authorized but unissued shares directly from the Holding Company . If authorized, the ESOP may purchase up to 4.0% of the Conversion Stock to be issued and any other Tax-Qualified Employee Plans may purchase in the aggregate up to 6.0% of the Conversion Stock to be issued. Notwithstanding any provision contained herein to the contrary, the Bank may make scheduled discretionary contributions to a Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan; provided, however, that such contributions do not cause the Bank to fail to meet its regulatory capital requirements.
7.   SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL ELIGIBLE ACCOUNT HOLDERS (THIRD PRIORITY).
     (a) Each Supplemental Eligible Account Holder, if any, shall receive without payment, as a third priority after the satisfaction of the subscriptions of Eligible Account Holders and Tax-

11


 

Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans, non-transferable Subscription Rights to purchase up to the greater of (i) 5.0% of the of Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings (or such maximum purchase limitation established for the Community, Syndicated or Public Offerings), (ii) one-tenth of 1.0% of the number of shares of Conversion Stock issued in the Offerings, or (iii) 15 times the product (rounded down to the next whole number) obtained by multiplying the number of the shares of Conversion Stock that will be issued in the Offerings by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of the Supplemental Eligible Account Holder and the denominator of which is the total amount of all of the Qualifying Deposits of all Supplemental Eligible Account Holders.
     (b) In the event of an oversubscription for shares of Conversion Stock by the Supplemental Eligible Account Holders pursuant to paragraph 7(a), the shares of Conversion Stock available for purchase will be allocated among the subscribing Supplemental Eligible Account Holders so as to permit each subscribing Supplemental Eligible Account Holder, to the extent possible, to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make his total allocation of Conversion Stock equal to the lesser of 100 shares or the number of shares subscribed for by such Supplemental Eligible Account Holder. Any shares of Conversion Stock remaining after such allocation will be allocated among the subscribing Supplemental Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied in the proportion that the amount of each Supplemental Eligible Account Holder’s Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of the Qualifying Deposits of all Supplemental Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied. If the amount so allocated exceeds the amount subscribed for by any one or more Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, the excess shall be reallocated on the same principle (one or more times as necessary) among those Supplemental Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions are still not fully satisfied until all available shares of Conversion Stock have been allocated or all subscriptions have been satisfied.
8.   COMMUNITY OFFERING, SYNDICATED COMMUNITY OFFERING, PUBLIC OFFERING AND OTHER OFFERINGS.
      A. Community Offering .
     (i) Conversion Stock which remains unsubscribed for after the exercise of Subscription Rights pursuant to Sections 5 through 7 hereof may be offered for sale to the general public through a Community Offering. The Community Offering will be conducted in a manner that will promote a widespread distribution of the Conversion Stock. The Community Offering may commence simultaneously with, during or after the Subscription Offering, as the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and the Bank so determine, provided, however, that it must be completed not more than 45 days after the last day of the Subscription Offering, unless otherwise extended with the approval of the Commissioner. The Community Offering may involve the use of a broker, dealer, consultant or investment banking firm experienced in the sale of savings institution securities.
     (ii) In making the Community Offering, preference will be given first to natural persons residing in the Bank’s Local Community, then to Minority Shareholders, then to natural persons residing elsewhere in the State of Connecticut, and then to the public at large. Persons shall have the right to purchase up to the maximum of 5.0% of the Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings in the Community Offering, subject to the maximum purchase limitations specified in Section 9 hereof; provided, however, orders accepted in the Community Offering shall be filled up to a maximum of 2.0% of the total Conversion Stock, and thereafter, remaining shares shall be allocated on an equal number of shares basis per order until all orders have been filled. The Holding Company and the

12


 

Bank may accept or reject subscriptions for shares of Conversion Stock in the Community Offering in whole or in part.
      B. Syndicated Community Offering.
     If any Conversion Stock remains unsubscribed for after the close of the Subscription Offering and Community Offering, the Holding Company may use the services of a syndicate of registered broker-dealers to sell such unsubscribed shares of Conversion Stock on a best efforts basis. The Syndicated Community Offering will be conducted in a manner that will promote the widespread distribution of the Conversion Stock. The syndicate of registered broker-dealers may be managed by one of the syndicate members who will act as agent of the Holding Company to assist the Holding Company in the sale of the Conversion Stock. Neither the syndicate manager nor any other syndicate member shall have any obligation to take or purchase any of the shares of Conversion Stock in the Syndicated Community Offering. The Syndicated Community Offering, if held, is expected to be held during or promptly after the Subscription Offering, as may be determined at any time by the Boards of Directors, provided that it must be completed not more than 45 days after the last day of the Subscription Offering, unless otherwise extended with the approval of the Commissioner. Persons shall have the right to purchase up to the maximum of 5.0% of Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings in the Syndicated Community Offering, subject to the maximum purchase limitations specified in Section 9 hereof. The Holding Company may accept or reject subscriptions for shares of Conversion Stock in the Syndicated Community Offering in whole or in part.
      C. Public Offering.
     If for any reason a Syndicated Community Offering of unsubscribed shares of Conversion Stock cannot be effected or is not deemed to be advisable, and shares of Conversion Stock remaining unsold after the Subscription Offering, the Community Offering or any Syndicated Community Offering, these shares may be sold to Underwriters for resale to the general public in a Public Offering. Any such Public Offering shall be conducted in accordance with applicable law and regulations. It is expected that the Public Offering would commence as soon as practicable after termination of the Subscription Offering, Community Offering and any Syndicated Community Offering.
     If for any reason a Public Offering of unsubscribed shares of Conversion Stock cannot be effected and any shares remain unsold after the Subscription Offering, Community Offering or any Syndicated Community Offering, the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and Bank will seek to make other arrangements for the sale of the remaining shares of Conversion Stock. Such other arrangements will be subject to the approval of the Commissioner and to compliance with applicable securities laws.
      D. Timing of Offerings.
     In addition to any other restrictions set forth in this Plan or required by applicable law, the Offerings shall be completed within twenty-four (24) months from the date this Plan is approved by the Board of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank.

13


 

9.   LIMITATIONS ON SUBSCRIPTIONS AND PURCHASES OF CONVERSION STOCK.
     The following limitations shall apply to all purchases and issuances of Conversion Stock in the Offerings:
     (a) Other than the Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan, the limitations to which are set forth below, the maximum number of shares of Conversion Stock that may be subscribed for or purchased in all categories in the Offerings by any Person or Participant, individually or together with any Associate or group of Persons Acting in Concert, is 5.0% of the shares of Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings.
     (b) A minimum of 25 shares of Conversion Stock must be purchased by each Person in the Offerings, to the extent such shares are available; provided; however, that such minimum number will be reduced so that the aggregate Purchase Price of such minimum shares will not exceed $500.
     (c) In addition to the other restrictions and limitations set forth herein, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Conversion Stock which may be subscribed for and purchased by Directors, Officers, employees and their Associates, when combined with the Exchange Shares received by such Persons, shall not exceed 25.0% of the total number of shares of Conversion Stock purchased and issued in the Offerings, including any shares of Conversion Stock which may be issued in the event of an increase in the maximum of the Estimated Purchase Price to reflect changes in market, financial and economic conditions after commencement of the Subscription Offering and prior to the completion of the Offering.
     (d) Except in the case of Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans in the aggregate, the limitations to which are set forth below, the maximum aggregate amount of Conversion Stock which any Person, together with any Associate or Persons Acting in Concert, may, directly or indirectly, subscribe for or purchase in the Offerings, when combined with any Exchange Shares received by such Persons, shall not exceed 5.0% of the total number of shares of Conversion Stock to be outstanding upon consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization, including any shares of Conversion Stock which may be issued in the event of an increase in the maximum of the Estimated Purchase Price to reflect a greater demand for shares or changes in market or financial conditions after commencement of the Subscription Offering and prior to the completion of the Offering; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require any Minority Stockholder to divest any Exchange Share or otherwise limit the amount of Exchange Shares to be issued to a Minority Stockholder.
     (e) The maximum number of shares of Conversion Stock which may be purchased in the Conversion and Reorganization by the ESOP shall not exceed 4.0% and all Tax Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans shall not exceed 10.0% of the total number of shares of Conversion Stock sold in the Offerings, in each instance, including any shares which may be issued in the event of an increase in the maximum of the Estimated Price Range to reflect a demand for the shares or changes in market or financial conditions after commencement of the Subscription Offering and prior to completion of the Offerings.
     (f) Depending upon the demand for our share and market and financial conditions and subject to any required regulatory approvals, the Boards of Directors, without further approval of the Shareholders or Corporators, unless such further approval is required by the Commissioner, may increase or decrease the purchase limitations in this Plan to a percentage that does not exceed 5.0% of the total number of shares of Conversion Stock purchased and issued in the Offerings, except as otherwise provided below. If the maximum purchase limitation is increased, the Holding Company shall resolicit Persons who subscribed for the maximum purchase amount and may, in the sole

14


 

discretion of the Holding Company, resolicit certain other large subscribers. Requests to purchase additional shares of the Conversion Stock in the event that the purchase limitations are so increased will be granted by the Board of Directors of the Holding Company in its sole discretion. In the event the maximum purchase limitation is increased to 5.0% upon request, the Commissioner may approve the purchase limitation to be increased to a percentage that does not exceed 10.0% of the total number of shares of Conversion Stock purchased and issued in the Offerings.
     (g) The Holding Company and the Bank shall have the right to take such action as they may, in their discretion based on the relevant facts and circumstances, deem necessary or appropriate to monitor and enforce the limitations and restrictions set forth in this Plan and the Order Form, including the right to reject, limit or revoke acceptance of any subscriptions or order, delay, terminate or refuse to consummate any sale of Conversion Stock which they believe may violate, or is designed to evade or circumvent such limitations and restrictions. In the event the number of shares of Conversion Stock otherwise allocable to any Person or that Person’s Associates would be in excess of the maximum number of shares permitted hereunder, the number of shares of Conversion Stock allocated to such Person and such Person’s Associates shall be reduced to the lowest applicable limitation to that Person and so that the aggregate allocation to that Person and his or her Associates complies with the above limits.
     (h) For purposes of this Section 9, (i) Directors and Officers of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, Bank of the Holding Company shall not be deemed to be Associates or a group affiliated with each other or otherwise Acting in Concert solely as a result of their being Directors or Officers of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the Bank or the Holding Company; (ii) the Holding Company shall not aggregate the Conversion Shares attributed to a Person in a Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan with shares of Conversion Stock purchased directly by, or otherwise attributable, to such Person; and (iii) shares purchased by a Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan pursuant to instructions of an individual in an account in such plan in which the individual has the right to direct the investment, including any plan of the bank qualified under Section 401(k) of the Code, shall be aggregated and included in that individual’s purchases and not attributed to the Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan; and (iv) Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans shall not be deemed to be Associates or Affiliates of, or Persons Acting in Concert with, any Director or Officer of the Holding Company or the Bank.
10.   TIMING OF SUBSCRIPTION OFFERING; MANNER OF EXERCISING SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS AND ORDER FORMS.
     (a) Promptly after the Commissioner and the SEC have declared effective the Prospectus and all other required regulatory approvals have been obtained, the Holding Company shall cause the Prospectus, together with the Order Forms, to be distributed to all Participants at their last known address appearing in the records of the Bank, for the purpose of enabling them to exercise their respective Subscription Rights. The Prospectus shall describe the Conversion and Reorganization and the Offerings and will contain all information necessary to enable the recipients of the Prospectus and Order Forms to make informed investment decisions regarding the purchase of Conversion Stock and as required by the Commissioner and applicable laws and regulations
     (b) The Order Forms will contain or will be accompanied by, among other things, the following:
     (i) An explanation of the rights and privileges granted under this Plan to each class of Persons granted Subscription Rights pursuant to Sections 5 to 7, inclusive, of this

15


 

Plan with respect to the purchase of shares of Conversion Stock, including the maximum and minimum number of shares that may be purchased;
     (ii) A specified time period in which Order Forms must be received by the Bank for purposes of exercising the Subscription Rights, which must be at least 20 days and not more than 45 days after the distribution of the Prospectus and Order Forms, unless otherwise extended with the approval of the Commissioner;
     (iii) A statement that the aggregate Purchase Price at which the Conversion Stock will ultimately be purchased in the Offerings has not been determined as of the date of mailing of the Prospectus and Order Form, but that such price will be within the range of prices which will be stated in the Prospectus and Order Form;
     (iv) The amount which must be returned with the Order Form to subscribe for shares of Conversion Stock. Such amount will be equal to the Purchase Price multiplied by the number of Conversion Shares subscribed for in accordance with the terms of this Plan;
     (v) Instructions concerning how to indicate on such Order Form the extent to which a Person elects to exercise Subscription Rights under this Plan, the name or names in which the shares of Conversion Stock subscribed for are to be registered, the address to which certificates representing such shares are to be sent and the alternative methods of payment for Conversion Stock which will be permitted;
     (vi) Specifically designated blank spaces for indicating the number of shares of Conversion Stock which each Person wishes to purchase and for dating and signing the Order Form;
     (vii) An acknowledgment that the recipient of the Order Form has received, prior to signing the Order Form, the Prospectus;
     (viii) A statement that the Subscription Rights provided for in this Plan are nontransferable, will be void after the specified time referred to in paragraph 10(b)(ii) above and may be exercised only by delivery of the Order Form, properly completed and executed, to the Bank, together with the full required payment (in the manner specified in Section 11 of this Plan) for the number of Shares subscribed for prior to such specified time;
     (ix) Provision for certification to be executed by the recipient of the Order Form to the effect that, as to any shares of Conversion Stock which the Person elects to purchase, such recipient is purchasing such shares for the Person’s account only and has no present agreement or understanding regarding any subsequent sale or transfer of such shares;
     (x) A statement to the effect that the executed Order Form, once received by the Bank, may not be modified or amended by the subscriber without the consent of the Bank; and
     (xi) An explanation of the manner of required payment and a statement that payment may be made by withdrawal from a certificate of deposit without penalty.

16


 

11. PAYMENT FOR CONVERSION STOCK.
     (a) Full payment for all shares of Conversion Stock subscribed for must be received by the Primary Parties, together with properly completed and executed Order Forms therefore.
     (b) A Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan that subscribes for Conversion Stock may pay for such shares of Conversion Stock upon consummation of the Offerings, provided that there is in force from the time of the Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan’s subscription until the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Plan, a loan commitment pursuant to which the Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plan will be loaned funds for the payment of the shares for which it subscribed.
     (c) If it is determined that the aggregate Purchase Price should be greater than the amount stated in the Order Forms, upon compliance with such requirements as may be imposed by the Commissioner and any other regulatory authorities, each Person who subscribed for shares of Conversion Stock will be permitted to withdraw their subscription and have their payment for shares returned to them in whole or in part, with interest, or to make payment to the Primary Parties of the additional amount necessary to pay for the shares of Conversion Stock subscribed for by such Person at the Purchase Price in the manner and within the time prescribed by the Primary Parties.
     (d) If the aggregate Purchase Price is outside the range of prices established by the Independent Appraiser and as set forth in the Prospectus, the Bank will apply for an amendment to the Commissioner’s approval of this Plan and comply with such requirements as the Commissioner may then establish.
     (e) Payment for shares of Conversion Stock ordered for purchase by Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, if any, and persons in the Community Offerings will be permitted to be made in any of the following manners:
     (i) By check, bank draft or money order, provided that checks will only be accepted subject to collection;
     (ii) By appropriate authorization of withdrawal from the subscriber’s Deposit Account at the Bank. The Order Forms will contain appropriate means by which authorization of such withdrawals may be made. For purposes of determining the withdrawable balance of such Deposit Accounts, such withdrawals will be deemed to have been made upon receipt of appropriate authorization therefore, but interest at the rates applicable to the Deposit Accounts from which the withdrawals have been deemed to have been made will be paid by the Bank on the amounts deemed to have been withdrawn until the date on which the Offering is consummated, at which date the authorized withdrawal will actually be made. Such withdrawals may be made upon receipt of Order Forms authorizing such withdrawals, but interest will be paid by the Bank on the amounts withdrawn as if such amounts had remained in the accounts from which they were withdrawn until the date upon which the sales of Conversion Stock pursuant to exercise of Subscription Rights are actually consummated. Interest will be paid by the Bank at not less than the rate per annum being paid by the Bank on its passbook accounts at the time the Subscription Offering commences on payments for Conversion Stock received in the Subscription Offering in cash or by check, bank draft, money order or negotiable order of withdrawal from the date payment is received until consummation or termination of the Offerings. The Bank shall be entitled to invest all amounts paid for subscriptions in the Subscription Offering for its own account until completion or termination of the Offering; or

17


 

     (f) Wire transfers as payment for shares of Conversion Stock ordered for purchase will not be permitted or accepted as proper payment.
     (g) Payments for the purchase of Conversion Stock in the Subscription Offering will be permitted through authorization of withdrawals from certificate accounts at the Bank without early withdrawal penalties. If the remaining balances of the certificate accounts after such withdrawals are less than the minimum qualifying balances under applicable regulations, the certificates evidencing the accounts will be canceled upon consummation of the Offerings, and the remaining balances will thereafter earn interest at the rate provided for in the certificates in the event of cancellation.
     (h) The Bank shall not knowingly loan funds or otherwise extend credit to any Participant or other Person to purchase Conversion Stock.
     (i) Each share of Conversion Stock shall be non-assessable upon payment in full of the aggregate Purchase Price owing.
12.   EXPIRATION OF SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS; UNDELIVERED, DEFECTIVE OR LATE ORDER FORMS; INSUFFICIENT PAYMENT.
     (a) All Subscription Rights provided for in this Plan will expire on a specified date described in the Prospectus and Order Form which shall be not less than 20 days nor more than 45 days following the date on which Order Forms are first mailed to the Participants, provided that the Primary Parties shall have the power to extend such expiration date upon receiving approval by the Commissioner.
     (b) In those cases in which the Primary Parties are unable to locate particular persons granted Subscription Rights under this Plan, and cases in which Order Forms: (i) are returned as undeliverable by the United States Post Office; (ii) are not received back by the Primary Parties or are received by the Primary Parties after the expiration date specified thereon; (iii) are defectively filled out or executed; or (iv) are not accompanied by the full required payment for the shares of Conversion Stock subscribed for (including cases in which Deposit Accounts from which withdrawals are authorized are insufficient to cover the amount of the required payment), the Subscription Rights of the Person to whom such Subscription Rights have been granted will lapse as though such Person failed to return the completed Order Form within the time period specified thereon. Furthermore, in the event that Order Forms (i) are not delivered and are returned to the Primary Parties by the United States Postal Service, or the Bank is unable to locate the addressee, or (ii) are not mailed pursuant to a “no mail” order placed in effect by the account holder, the Subscription Rights of the Person to which such rights have been granted will lapse as though such Person failed to return the Order Form within the time period specified thereon.
     (c) The Primary Parties shall have the right, in their discretion based on the applicable facts and circumstances and without liability to any subscriber or other Person, to reject or reduce any Order Form, including, but not limited to, any Order Form (i) that is improperly completed or executed; (ii) that is not timely received; (iii) that is submitted by facsimile or is photocopied; (iv) that is not accompanied by the proper payment (or authorization of withdrawal for payment) or, in the case of institutional investors, not accompanied by an irrevocable order together with a legally binding commitment to pay the full amount of the purchase price prior to 48 hours before the completion of the Offerings; or (v) that is submitted by a Person whose representations are believed by the Primary Parties to be false or who the Primary Parties otherwise believe, either alone or Acting In Concert with others, is violating, evading or circumventing, or intends to violate, evade or

18


 

circumvent, the terms and conditions of this Plan. The Primary Parties may, but will not be required to, waive any irregularity on any Order Form or may require the submission of corrected Order Forms or the remittance of full payment for shares of Conversion Stock by such date as they may specify. The interpretation of the Primary Parties of the terms and conditions of the Order Forms shall be final, conclusive and binding on all Persons.
13.   PARTICIPANTS IN NONQUALIFIED JURISDICTIONS OR FOREIGN COUNTRIES.
     The Primary Parties will make reasonable efforts to comply with the securities laws of all jurisdictions of the United States in which Participants entitled to subscribe for shares of Conversion Stock pursuant to this Plan reside; provided, however, that no such Participant will be offered any Subscription Rights or sold any Conversion Stock under this Plan who resides in a foreign country or who resides in a jurisdiction of the United States with respect to which all of the following apply: (a) there are few Participants eligible to subscribe for shares of Conversion Stock under the Plan who reside in such jurisdiction, (b) the granting of Subscription Rights or the offer or sale of Conversion Stock to such Participants would require the Primary Parties or their employees, under the laws of such jurisdiction, to register as a broker, dealer or agent or to register or otherwise qualify the Conversion Stock for sale in such jurisdiction, and (c) such registration, qualification or filing in the judgment of the Primary Parties would be impracticable or unduly burdensome for reasons of cost or otherwise. No payments will be made in lieu of the granting of Subscription Rights to such Persons.
14.   VOTING RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS.
     Following the Conversion and Reorganization, voting rights with respect to the Bank will be held and exercised exclusively by the Holding Company, as the owner of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Bank. Voting rights with respect to the Holding Company will be held and exercised exclusively by the holders of the Holding Company Common Stock.
15.   LIQUIDATION ACCOUNT.
     (a) The Holding Company will, at the time of the Conversion and Reorganization, establish a Liquidation Account in an amount equal to the net worth of the MHC in the statement of financial condition included in the final Prospectus. The function of the Liquidation Account is to establish a priority in the event of liquidation of (i) the Bank or (ii) the Bank and the Holding Company and, except as provided for in this Section 15, shall not affect the Bank’s or Holding Company’s net worth.
     (b) The Liquidation Account shall be maintained by the Holding Company for a period of 10 years after the effective date of the Conversion and Reorganization for the benefit of the Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Account Holders, if any, who continue to maintain Deposit Accounts at the Bank. Each Eligible Account Holder and Supplemental Eligible Account Holder will have a separate inchoate interest in the Liquidation Account in relation to each Deposit Account making up a Qualifying Deposit. Such inchoate interests are referred to herein as “sub-accounts.” Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders do not retain any voting rights based on their sub-accounts.
     (c) The initial balance of a sub-account in the Liquidation Account held by an Eligible Account Holder and/or Supplemental Eligible Account Holder shall be an amount determined by multiplying the amount in the Liquidation Account by a fraction, the numerator of which is the

19


 

amount of Qualifying Deposits in such Qualifying Deposit Account on the Eligibility Record Date or the Supplemental Eligibility Record Date, as appropriate, and the denominator of which is the total amount of all Qualifying Deposits of all Eligible Account Holders or all Supplemental Account Holders, as appropriate, on the corresponding record date. For Qualifying Deposit Accounts in existence at both record dates, separate sub-accounts shall be determined on the basis of the Qualifying Deposits in such Qualifying Deposit Accounts on such record dates.
     (d) The initial balance of each sub-account in the Liquidation Account shall never be increased, but will be subject to downward adjustment as follows: If the balance in the Deposit Account to which a sub-account balance relates, at the close of business on any annual fiscal year closing date of the Bank subsequent to the corresponding record date, is less than the lesser of (i) the balance in such Deposit Account at the close of business on any other annual fiscal year closing date subsequent to the Eligibility Record Date or Supplemental Eligibility Record Date, as applicable or (ii) the amount of the Qualifying Deposit as of the Eligibility Record Date or Supplemental Eligibility Record Date, as applicable, then the sub-account balance for such Deposit Account shall be adjusted by reducing such sub-account balance in an amount proportionate to the reduction in such Deposit Account balance. In the event of such downward adjustment, the sub-account balance shall not be subsequently increased, notwithstanding any increase in the balance of the related Deposit Account. If any Deposit Account is closed, its related sub-account balance shall be reduced to zero upon such closing.
     (e) In the event of a complete liquidation of the (i) the Bank or (ii) the Bank and the Holding Company (and only in such an event) within 10 years of the consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization, each Eligible Account Holder and Supplemental Eligible Account Holder, if any, shall receive from the Liquidation Account a liquidation distribution in the amount of the then-current adjusted sub-account balances for Deposit Accounts then held. Such distribution shall be made before any liquidation distribution is be made to any holders of capital stock of the Holding Company. No merger, consolidation, purchase of bulk assets with assumption of deposit accounts and other liabilities, or similar transactions in which the Holding Company or the Bank is not the surviving institution, will be deemed to be a complete liquidation for this purpose, and, in any such transaction, the Liquidation Account shall be assumed by the surviving institution.
16.   TRANSFER OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS.
     The Conversion and Reorganization will have no affect on the Deposit Accounts at the Bank, except to the extent individual Depositors choose to have funds withdrawn in connection with a subscription of shares of Conversion Stock in the Offerings.
17.   REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING THE CONVERSION AND REORGANIZATION FOR REGISTRATION, MARKET MAKING AND STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING.
     Following the Conversion and Reorganization, the Holding Company shall: (i) promptly register its shares of Holding Company Common Stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not deregister its shares for at least 3 years; (ii) encourage and assist a Market Maker to establish and to maintain a market for the shares of Holding Company Common Stock; (iii) use its best efforts to list the shares of Holding Company Common Stock on a national or regional securities exchange or on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system; and (iv) file all reports that the Commissioner or other regulatory authorities may require.

20


 

18.   RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER OF CONVERSION STOCK BY OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS.
     (a) Directors and Officers of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank who purchase shares of Conversion Stock in the Offering are restricted from selling such shares for a period of one year after the effective date of the Conversion and Reorganization, except in the event of the death of such Officer or Director, unless such sale is otherwise approved by the Commissioner.
     (b) With respect to all shares of Conversion Stock subject to restriction on subsequent disposition pursuant to Section 18(a) hereof, each of the following provisions shall apply: (i) each certificate representing such shares of Conversion Stock shall bear a legend prominently stamped on its face giving notice of such restriction; (ii) instructions will be given to the transfer agent for the Holding Company not to recognize or effect any transfer of any certificates representing such shares of Conversion Stock, or any change of record ownership thereof in violation of such restriction on transfer; and (iii) any shares of the Conversion Stock issued in respect of a stock dividend, stock split or otherwise in respect of ownership of outstanding shares of Conversion Stock subject to restrictions on transfer hereunder will be subject to the same restrictions as are applicable to the Conversion Stock in respect of which such shares are issued.
19.   RESTRICTION ON ACQUISITIONS OF CONVERSION STOCK.
     (a) For a period of 5 years following completion of the Conversion and Reorganization, no Person, acting singly or with an Associate or one or more Persons Acting In Concert, shall directly or indirectly, offer to acquire or acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of any class of an equity security of the Holding Company without the prior written approval of the Commissioner. The provisions of this Section 19 shall not apply to (i) any offer to acquire with a view toward public resale made solely and exclusively to the Holding Company, or underwriters or a selling group acting on behalf of the Holding Company; (ii) any offer to acquire up to 10.0% of any class of shares of the Holding Company, provided the Commissioner does not object in writing; (iii) an offer to acquire or an acquisition by a corporation whose ownership is or will be substantially the same as the Holding Company’s ownership, provided the offer or acquisition is made more than 1 year after the Conversion and Reorganization; or (iv) the acquisition by one or more Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans, provided that the Plans do not beneficially own more than 25.0% of the shares of Conversion Stock in the aggregate.
     (b) Where any Person directly or indirectly, acquires beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of any class of any equity security of the Holding Company within such 5 year period without the prior approval of the Commissioner, the Conversion Stock beneficially owned by such Person in excess of such 10.0% limit shall not be counted as shares entitled to vote and shall not be voted by any Person or counted as voting shares in connection with any matter submitted to the Shareholders for a vote.
     (c) For a period of 3 years following completion of the Conversion and Reorganization, Directors and Officers of the Holding Company and the Bank and their Associates may only purchase shares of Conversion Stock from a broker-dealer registered under the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act, except that such Officers, Directors and their Associates may (i) engage in a negotiated transaction involving more than 1.0% of issued and outstanding Conversion Stock and (ii) purchase Conversion Stock through any of the Holding Company’s Stock Benefit Plans.

21


 

20.   STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS.
     (a) The Holding Company and the Bank are authorized to adopt Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans in connection with the Conversion and Reorganization.
     (b) Subsequent to the Conversion and Reorganization, the Holding Company and the Bank are authorized to adopt stock option plans and management or employee stock plans, provided, however, that any such plan implemented during the 1 year following consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization: (i) is disclosed in the Proxy Solicitation Materials and Prospectus; (ii) is subject to a separate majority vote by the Shareholders of the Holding Company at least 6 months after consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization; (iii) in the case of a stock option plan, does not grant stock options in excess of 10.0% of the shares of Conversion Stock issued in the Conversion and Reorganization; (iv) in the case of management stock benefit plan, does not hold, in the aggregate, more than 3.0% of the shares of Conversion Stock issued in the Conversion and Reorganization, which may be increased to 4.0% with the approval of the Commissioner, subject to certain exceptions set forth in applicable regulations; (v) in the case of any tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan and management stock benefit plan, does not hold, in the aggregate, more than 10.0% of the shares of Conversion Stock issued in the Conversion and Reorganization; (vi) does not permit an individual to receive more than 25.0% of the shares under the plan; (vii) does not permit Directors of the Holding Company or the Bank who are not employees to receive more than 5.0% of the shares of any benefit plan individually or 30.0% of the shares of any one or more benefit plan in the aggregate; (viii) complies with Connecticut statutes and regulations; (ix) does not grant stock options at less than the market price of such options at the time of grant; (x) is not funded by stock issued at the time of the Conversion and Reorganization; (xi) does not begin to vest earlier than one year after the shareholders of the Holding Company approve such plan or at a rate exceeding 20.0% per year; (xii) permits accelerated vesting only for disability or death or in the event of a change of control; and (xiii) provides that Officers or Directors shall exercise or forfeit their options if the Bank becomes critically undercapitalized under applicable federal law, is subject to an enforcement action by the Commissioner or receives a capital directive from the Commissioner.
21.   DIVIDEND AND REPURCHASE RESTRICTIONS ON STOCK.
     (a) The Holding Company may not repurchase shares of Conversion Stock for a period of 1 year after the Conversion and Reorganization, provided that the Holding Company may seek approval from the Commissioner to make (i) repurchases in the open market of up to 5.0% of the Holding Company’s outstanding stock in extraordinary circumstances; (ii) repurchases of qualifying shares of a director or pursuant to an offer made to all shareholders; (iii) repurchases to fund management recognition plans that have been ratified by the Shareholders in accordance with the Holding Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws; and (iv) repurchases to fund Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans. Such request for approval shall provide the purpose of the repurchases, an explanation of any extraordinary circumstances necessitating the repurchases and any additional information required by the Commissioner.
     (b) The Holding Company may declare or pay a dividend on the Holding Company Common Stock after the completion of the Conversion and Reorganization (i) if the Holding Company does not return any capital, other than ordinary dividends, to purchasers during the term of the business plan submitted with the Conversion and Reorganization; (ii) the dividend will not reduce the Bank’s regulatory capital below the amount required for the Liquidation Account pursuant to Connecticut regulations; and (iii) it complies with applicable law.

22


 

22.   EFFECTIVE DATE.
     The effective date of the Conversion and Reorganization shall be the date upon which the last of the following actions occurs: (i) the filing of the Plan of Merger or a Certificate of Merger with the Connecticut Secretary of State with respect to the Mid-Tier Holding Company Merger and (ii) the closing of the issuance of the shares of Conversion Stock in the Offering. The filing of the Plan of Merger or a Certificate of Merger relating to the MHC Merger and the Mid-Tier Holding Company Merger and the closings of the issuance of shares of Conversion Stock in the Offering shall not occur until all requisite regulatory, Corporator and Shareholder approvals have been obtained, all applicable waiting periods have expired and sufficient subscriptions and orders for the Conversion Stock have been received. It is intended that the closing of the MHC Merger and the Mid-Tier Holding Company Merger and the sales of shares of Conversion Stock in the Offering shall occur consecutively and substantially simultaneously.
23.   CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS.
     As part of the Conversion and Reorganization, a Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws will be adopted to reflect the Conversion and Reorganization of the Mutual Holding Company from mutual to stock form. Copies of the proposed Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws are attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2 , respectively, and made part of the Plan. By approving the Plan, the Corporators of the MHC will be approving the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Bank. Prior to completion of the Conversion, the proposed Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Holding Company may be amended in accordance with the provisions and limitations for amending the Plan under Section 25 herein. The effective date of the adoption of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Holding Company shall be the date of filing of the Certificate of Incorporation and such other documents as required by the Department of Banking with the Secretary of State of the State of Connecticut.
24.   CONTRIBUTION TO THE FOUNDATION.
     In connection with the Conversion and Reorganization and in furtherance of the Bank’s commitment to the local community, the Holding Company intends to make a cash donation to the Foundation from the proceeds of the Offerings. The amount to be contributed will equal 3.0% of the net proceeds of the Offerings. The Foundation was established in May 2005 in connection with the Mid-Tier Holding Company’s minority stock issuance. The Foundation is governed by a board of directors, which is currently comprised of Michael A. Bars, Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr., Raymond H. Lefurge and William J. McGurk, all of whom also serve on the Board of Directors of the Bank. These directors will continue to serve on the board of the foundation after the consummation of the Conversion and Reorganization.
     The Foundation, which is not a subsidiary, provides grants to non-profit organizations within the communities that the Bank serves. At June 30, 2010, the Foundation had assets of approximately $4.5 million, which included Existing Rockville Financial common stock with a value of $3.8 million. The Boards of Directors of the Bank, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the MHC believe that the contribution will allow the local community to continue to share in the growth and financial success of the Bank.
     The cash contribution to the Foundation has been approved by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the New Holding Company and the Bank. The directors who serve on the Boards of Directors of both the Foundation and the Bank abstained from such vote in accordance with Connecticut law. The contribution must also be approved by at least (i) 80.0% of the total voting power of the Corporators eligible to vote, which total voting power shall not be

23


 

less than 25 Corporators, and (ii) a majority of the Independent Corporators, who shall constitute not less than 60.0% of the total voting power of the Corporators. In the event the Corporators do not approve the contribution to the Foundation, the Bank, the Mid-Tier Holding Company, the MHC and Holding Company will proceed with the Conversion and Reorganization without funding the Foundation.
25.   AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN.
     This Plan may be substantively amended by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank in their sole discretion at any time with the concurrence of the Commissioner and, if necessary, the FRB and FDIC, or as a result of comments from regulatory authorities. This Plan may be terminated by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and Bank at any time.
26.   INTERPRETATION OF THE PLAN.
     All interpretations of this Plan and application of its provisions to particular circumstances by a majority of the Board of Directors of the MHC, the Mid-Tier Holding Company and the Bank shall be final, subject to the authority of the Commissioner and other regulatory authorities.
     The undersigned Secretary of Rockville Bank, Rockville Financial, Inc., and Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. hereby certifies that the above Plan of Conversion and Reorganization, as amended, was adopted by action of the Boards of Directors of Rockville Bank, Rockville Financial, Inc., and Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. on September 16, 2010.
         
     
  /s/ Judy Keppner Clark    
  Judy Keppner Clark   
  Secretary   
 

24

Exhibit 3.1
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL NEW, INC.
(A Connecticut Stock Corporation)
     The undersigned Incorporator hereby forms a corporation under the Connecticut Business Corporation Act.
Section 1. Name of Corporation.
     The name of the corporation shall be ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL NEW, INC., hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation.”
Section 2. Registered Office and Registered Agent.
     The street address of the initial registered office of the Corporation is 25 Park Street, Rockville, Connecticut 06066, and the name and address of the initial registered agent of the Corporation at that office is William J. McGurk, with a residence address of 21 Stillmeadow Lane, Somers, Connecticut 06071, and with a business address of 25 Park Street, Rockville, Connecticut 06066.
Section 3. Duration.
     The duration of the Corporation is perpetual.
Section 4. Purpose and Powers of Corporation.
     The nature of the activities to be transacted and the purposes to be promoted, carried out and engaged in by the Corporation are the following:
     A. To pursue any or all of the lawful objectives of a bank holding company chartered pursuant to the laws of the State of Connecticut, and to exercise all of the express, implied and incidental powers conferred by such laws and by all amendments or supplements to such laws, subject to all lawful and applicable rules, regulations and orders of the Banking Commissioner of the State of Connecticut (the “Commissioner”), the Federal Reserve Board, or any other state or federal agency having the authority to supervise or regulate the Corporation and the conduct of its business.
     B. Subject to the foregoing paragraph A hereof, to engage generally in any business that may be promoted, carried out and engaged in by a corporation organized under the Connecticut Business Corporation Act.
Section 5. Authorized Capital Stock.
     The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation is authorized

 


 

to issue is forty-two million (42,000,000), of which forty-one million (41,000,000) shall be common stock, no par value per share, and of which one million shares (1,000,000) shall be preferred stock, no par value per share. The shares may be issued from time to time as authorized by the Board of Directors without further approval of shareholders, except as otherwise provided in this Section 4, or subject to applicable law. The consideration for the issuance of the shares shall be paid in full before their issuance and otherwise shall comply with all requirements of Connecticut law. Upon payment of such consideration, such shares shall be deemed to be fully paid and nonassessable.
     Nothing contained in this Section 5 (or in any other sections herein) shall entitle the holders of any class or series of capital stock to vote as a separate class or series or to more than one vote per share.
     A description of the different classes and series (if any) of the Corporation’s capital stock and a statement of the designations, and the relative rights, preferences and limitations of the shares of each class of and series (if any) of capital stock are as follows:
A. Common Stock . Except as provided in this Section 5 (or in any resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant hereto), the holders of the Common Stock shall exclusively possess all voting power. Each holder of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share held by such holder. There shall be no cumulative voting rights in the election of Directors. Each share of Common Stock shall have the same relative rights as and be identical in all respects with all other shares of Common Stock.
     Whenever there shall have been paid, or declared and set aside for payment, to the holders of the outstanding shares of any class of stock having preference over the Common Stock as to the payment of dividends, the full amount of dividends and of any sinking fund or retirement fund or other retirement payments, if any, to which such holders are respectively entitled in preference to the Common Stock, then dividends may be paid on the Common Stock and on any class or series of stock entitled to participate therewith as to dividends, out of any assets legally available for the payment of dividends, but only when and as declared by the Board of Directors.
     In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, after there shall have been paid to or set aside for the holders of any class having preferences over the Common Stock in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation the full preferential amounts of which they are respectively entitled, the holders of the Common Stock, and of any class or series of stock entitled to participate therewith, in whole or in part, as to distribution of assets, shall be entitled after payment or provision for payment of all debts and liabilities of the Corporation, to receive the remaining assets of the Corporation available for distribution, in cash or in kind.
B. Preferred Stock. Shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series as may from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors, each of such series to be distinctly designated. All shares of any one series of preferred stock shall be identical. Shares of preferred stock shall not entitle the holder or holders thereof to vote except

2


 

when specifically authorized to vote by the Board of Directors or if required to vote as a class pursuant to the Connecticut General Statutes. All other preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights of each of such series, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, if any, may differ from those of any and all other series at any time outstanding; and the Board of Directors of the Corporation is hereby expressly granted exclusive authority to fix, by resolution or resolutions adopted prior to the issuance of any shares of a particular series of preferred stock, the designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions, of such series including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following:
i) The distinctive designation of and the number of shares of preferred stock that shall constitute such series, which number may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares then outstanding) from time to time by action of the Board of Directors;
ii) The rate and times at which, and the terms and conditions on which, dividends, if any, on preferred stock of such series shall be paid, the extent of the preference or relation, if any, of such dividends to the dividends payable on any other class or classes or series of the same or other classes of capital stock and whether (and the dates from which) such dividends shall be cumulative or noncumulative;
iii) The right, if any, of the holders of preferred stock of such series to convert the shares thereof into or exchange the same for, shares of any other class or classes or of any series of the same or any other class or classes of capital stock of the Corporation or any other corporation and the terms and conditions of such conversion or exchange;
iv) Whether or not preferred stock of such series shall be subject to redemption, and the redemption price or prices and the time or times at which, and the terms and conditions on which, the shares of such series may be redeemed;
v) The rights, if any, of the holders of preferred stock of such series upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, merger, consolidation, distribution or sale of assets, dissolution or winding-up of the Corporation;
vi) The terms of the sinking fund or redemption or purchase account, if any, to be provided for the preferred stock of such series; and
vii) The voting rights, if any, of the holders of preferred stock in any particular series.
Unless otherwise provided in this Certificate of Incorporation or in the Bylaws of the Corporation, to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business on any matter at a meeting of

3


 

shareholders, there must be present, in person or by proxy, a majority of the shares of voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon. The shareholders present at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough shares to leave less than a quorum.
B. The Corporation may from time to time, pursuant to authorization by the Board of Directors of the Corporation and without action by the shareholders, purchase or otherwise acquire shares of any class, bonds, debentures, notes, scrip, warrants, obligations, evidences of indebtedness, or other securities of the Corporation in such a manner, upon such terms, and in such amounts as the Board of Directors shall determine; subject, however, to such limitations or restrictions, if any, as are contained in the express terms of any class of shares of the Corporation outstanding at the time of the purchase or acquisition in question or as are imposed by law or by regulation or order of the Commissioner. Such shares shall constitute authorized but unissued shares.
Section 6. Restrictions on Ownership of Stock
     No person shall directly or indirectly offer to acquire or acquire the beneficial ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of any class of any equity security of the Corporation without the prior approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the Board of Directors and the prior written approval of the Commissioner. In the event shares are acquired in violation of this Section 6, all shares beneficially owned by any person in excess of ten percent (10%) shall be considered “excess shares” and shall not be counted as shares entitled to vote, shall not be voted by any person or counted as voting shares in connection with any matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote, and shall not be counted as outstanding for purposes of determining the affirmative vote necessary to approve any matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote.
     Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation to the contrary, the prior written approval of the Commissioner shall not be required in the event the acquisition of the beneficial ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of any class of any equity security of the Corporation occurs more than five (5) years from the date the Corporation becomes the owner of 100% of the capital stock of Rockville Bank.
     “Beneficial ownership” shall be determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or any successor rule or statutory provision), or, if said Rule 13d-3 shall be rescinded and there shall be no successor rule or provision thereto, pursuant to said Rule 13d-3 as in effect on the date of filing of this Certificate of Incorporation; provided, however, that a person shall, in any event, also be deemed the “beneficial owner” of any common stock:
  (1)   which such person or any of its Affiliates (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as in effect on the date of filing of this Certificate of Incorporation) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly; or

4


 

  (2)   which such person or any of its Affiliates has: (a) the right to acquire (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time), pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options or otherwise, or (b) sole or shared voting or investment power with respect thereto pursuant to any agreement, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise (but shall not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of any voting shares solely by reason of a revocable proxy granted for a particular meeting of stockholders, pursuant to a public solicitation of proxies for such meeting, with respect to shares of which neither such person nor any such Affiliate is otherwise deemed the beneficial owner); or
 
  (3)   which are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by any other person with which such first mentioned person or any of its Affiliates acts as a partnership, limited partnership, syndicate or other group pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting or disposing of any shares of capital stock of the Corporation; and
provided further, however, that: (a) no director or officer of the Corporation (or any Affiliate of any such director or officer) shall, solely by reason of any or all of such directors or officers acting in their capacities as such, be deemed, for any purposes hereof, to beneficially own any common stock beneficially owned by any other such director or officer (or any Affiliate thereof); and (b) neither any employee stock ownership plan or similar plan of the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation, nor any trustee with respect thereto or any Affiliate of such trustee (solely by reason of such capacity of such trustee), shall be deemed, for any purposes hereof, to beneficially own any common stock held under any such plan.
     The Board of Directors shall have the power to construe and apply the provisions of this Section and to make all determinations necessary or desirable to implement such provisions, including but not limited to matters with respect to: (a) the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by any person; (b) whether a person is an Affiliate of another; (c) whether a person has an agreement, arrangement or understanding with another as to the matters referred to in the definition of beneficial ownership; (d) the application of any other definition or operative provision of this Section to the given facts; or (e) any other matter relating to the applicability or effect of this Section.
     The Board of Directors shall have the right to demand that any person who is reasonably believed to beneficially own shares of common stock that are “excess shares” (or holds of record common stock beneficially owned by any person in excess of the limit described above) supply the Corporation with complete information as to: (a) the record owner(s) of all shares beneficially owned by such person who is reasonably believed to own shares in excess of the limit described above; and (b) any other factual matter relating to the applicability or effect of this Section as may reasonably be requested of such person.
     Special meetings of shareholders relating to changes in control of the Corporation or amendments to its Certificate of Incorporation shall be called only at the direction of the Board of

5


 

Directors. This provision is perpetual, and not limited to the five (5) year period.
Section 7. Preemptive Rights.
     Holders of the stock of the Corporation are not entitled to preemptive rights with respect to any shares of the Corporation that may be issued.
Section 8. Directors.
     The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed under the direction of its Board of Directors. The authorized number of Directors, as stated in the Corporation’s Bylaws, shall not be fewer than eight (8) nor more than sixteen (16). The Directors of the Corporation shall be divided into four (4) classes, namely, Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV, as nearly equal in number as possible with each class consisting of no fewer than two (2) or more than four (4) Directors. Each member of the Board of Directors in Class I shall hold office until the annual meeting of the Corporation in 2012, each member of the Board of Directors of Class II shall hold shall hold office until the annual meeting of the Corporation in 2013, each member of the Board of Directors in Class III shall hold office until the annual meeting of the Corporation in 2014, and each member of the Board of Directors in Class IV shall hold office until the annual meeting of the Corporation in 2015. At each annual meeting, the successors, if any, to the class of directors whose terms expire at that meeting shall be elected to serve four (4) year terms and until their successors are elected and qualified.
     The personal liability of any Director to the Corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of duty as a Director is hereby limited to the amount of the compensation received by the Director for serving the Corporation during the year of the violation if such breach did not (i) involve a knowing and culpable violation of law by the Director, (ii) enable the Director or an associate, as defined in subdivision (3) of Section 33-843 of the Connecticut General Statutes, to receive an improper personal economic gain, (iii) show a lack of good faith and a conscious disregard for the duty of the Director to the Corporation under circumstances in which the Director was aware that his or her conduct or omission created an unjustifiable risk of serious injury to the Corporation, (iv) constitute a sustained and unexcused pattern of inattention that amounted to an abdication of the Director’s duty to the Corporation, or (v) create liability under Section 36a-58 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Any lawful repeal or modification of this provision by the shareholders and the Board of Directors of the Corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a Director existing at or prior to the time of such repeal or modification.
     The name, address and initial term of each prospective initial Director of the Corporation are as set forth below:

6


 

         
        Next Date
Name   Address   of Election
C. Perry Chilberg
  111 Debbie Drive   2011
 
  South Windsor, Connecticut    
 
       
Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
  121 Cliffwood Drive   2011
 
  South Windsor, Connecticut    
 
       
Kristen Johnson
  19B Folkstone Road   2011
 
  Broad Brook, Connecticut    
 
       
Rosemarie Novello Papa
  229 Bobby Lane   2011
 
  Manchester, Connecticut    
 
       
Michael A. Bars
  181 Mohegan Trail   2012
 
  South Windsor, Connecticut    
 
       
Pamela J. Guenard
  47 Ellington Avenue   2012
 
  Ellington, Connecticut    
 
       
Thomas S. Mason
  183 Reservoir Road   2012
 
  Vernon, Connecticut    
 
       
Peter F. Olson
  39 Tolland Avenue   2012
 
  Rockville, Connecticut    
 
       
Raymond H. LeFurge
  1 Boulder Crest Lane   2013
 
  Vernon, Connecticut    
 
       
Stuart E. Magdefrau
  55 Hayes Avenue   2013
 
  Ellington, Connecticut    
 
       
William J. McGurk
  21 Stillmeadow Lane   2013
 
  Somers, Connecticut    
 
       
David A. Engelson
  82 Meadowview Lane   2014
 
  Vernon, Connecticut    
 
       
Richard M. Tkacz
  111 Abbe Road   2014
 
  Enfield, Connecticut    
Section 9. Consideration of a Merger or Other Business Combinations
     The Directors shall consider the following criteria when determining whether to authorize the Corporation to engage in a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or sale of assets other than in the ordinary course of business:
  (a)   the long and short-term interests of the Corporation;
 
  (b)   the long and short-term interests of the Corporation’s shareholders;
 
  (c)   the interests of the Corporation’s employees, customers, creditors and suppliers; and
 
  (d)   community and societal considerations including those of any community in which the Corporation or its subsidiary, Rockville Bank, has an office.

7


 

    A Director may also, in his/her discretion, consider any other factors he/she considers appropriate in determining what he/she believes to be in the Corporation’s best interest.
Section 10. Removal of Directors.
     Any Director may be removed from office at any time, for cause only, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors then in office or by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least eight percent (80%) of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote for the election of Directors.
Section 11. Certain Business Combinations.
     Without limiting the restrictions of Section 6 above, the provisions of Section 33-844 of the Connecticut General Statutes as in effect on the date hereof (or any succeeding, substantially similar statutory provisions) regarding the prohibition of a business combination with an Interested Shareholder for five (5) years as described therein shall also apply to the Corporation and are incorporated herein by reference.
Section 12. Mergers, Consolidations and Other Business Combinations.
     Without limiting the restrictions of Section 6 and 11 above, the Corporation may only engage in a merger, consolidation, share exchange or sale of substantially all of the assets of the Corporation other than in the ordinary course of business upon receiving the vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors then in office and by the affirmative vote of the holders of shares of capital stock having two-thirds (2/3) of the voting power of all issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote upon such approval, authorization, ratification or determination.
Section 13. Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation.
     Except as provided in Section 5, no amendment, addition, alteration, change or repeal of this Certificate of Incorporation shall be made, unless such is first proposed by the Board of Directors of the Corporation and thereafter approved by the shareholders by the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast at a meeting.; provided that, a vote of not less than eighty percent (80%) of the total votes eligible to be cast will be required to amend Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Section 14. Liquidation Account.
     Under the regulations of the State of Connecticut Department of Banking, the Corporation must establish and maintain a liquidation account (the “Liquidation Account”) for the benefit of certain Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders as defined in the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization dated September 16, 2010 (the “Plan of Conversion”). In the event of a complete liquidation involving the (i) Rockville Bank or (ii) the Corporation and Rockville Bank, the Corporation must comply with the regulations of the Connecticut Department of

8


 

Banking and the provisions of the Plan of Conversion with respect to the amount and priorities of each Eligible Account Holder’s and Supplemental Eligible Account Holder’s interests in the Liquidation Account. The interest of an Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental Eligible Account Holder in the Liquidation Account does not entitle such account holders to voting rights.

9


 

     The undersigned sole incorporator, a Connecticut stock corporation, hereby declares, under the penalties of false statement, that the statements made in the foregoing Certificate of Incorporation are true.
     Dated this 13th day of September, 2010.
         
  ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
a Connecticut stock corporation,

25 Park Street
Rockville, Connecticut 06066
 
 
  By:   /s/ William J. McGurk    
         William J. McGurk   
         Its President   
 
     I, William J. McGurk, hereby accept appointment as agent for service of process for Rockville Financial, Inc.
     Dated this 13th day of September, 2010.
         
  /s/ William J. McGurk  
     
     
     
 

10

Exhibit 3.1.1
     On September 16, 2010, the Directors and sole shareholder of Rockville Financial New, Inc., amended and restated Section 6 of the Certificate of Incorporation of Rockville Financial New, Inc. in its entirety as follows:
     Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation to the contrary, for a period of five (5) years from the date the Corporation becomes the owner of 100% of the capital stock of Rockville Bank, the following provision shall apply:
     No person shall directly or indirectly offer to acquire or acquire the beneficial ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of any class of any equity security of the Corporation without the prior approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the Board of Directors and the prior written approval of the Commissioner. In the event shares are acquired in violation of this Section 6, all shares beneficially owned by any person in excess of ten percent (10%) shall be considered “excess shares” and shall not be counted as shares entitled to vote, shall not be voted by any person or counted as voting shares in connection with any matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote, and shall not be counted as outstanding for purposes of determining the affirmative vote necessary to approve any matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote.
     Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation to the contrary, the provisions requiring prior approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the Board of Directors in the event the acquisition of the beneficial ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of any class of any equity security of the Corporation is perpetual, and not limited to the five (5) year period.
     “Beneficial ownership” shall be determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or any successor rule or statutory provision), or, if said Rule 13d-3 shall be rescinded and there shall be no successor rule or provision thereto, pursuant to said Rule 13d-3 as in effect on the date of filing of this Certificate of Incorporation; provided, however, that a person shall, in any event, also be deemed the “beneficial owner” of any common stock:
  (1)   which such person or any of its Affiliates (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as in effect on the date of filing of this Certificate of Incorporation) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly; or
 
  (2)   which such person or any of its Affiliates has: (a) the right to acquire (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time), pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options or otherwise, or (b) sole or shared voting or investment power with respect thereto pursuant to any agreement, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise (but shall not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of any voting shares solely by reason of a revocable proxy granted for a particular meeting of stockholders, pursuant to a public solicitation of proxies for such meeting, with respect to shares of which neither such person nor any such Affiliate is otherwise deemed the beneficial owner); or
 
  (3)   which are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by any other person with which such first mentioned person or any of its Affiliates acts as a partnership, limited partnership, syndicate or other group pursuant to any agreement,

 


 

      arrangement or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting or disposing of any shares of capital stock of the Corporation; and
provided further, however, that: (a) no director or officer of the Corporation (or any Affiliate of any such director or officer) shall, solely by reason of any or all of such directors or officers acting in their capacities as such, be deemed, for any purposes hereof, to beneficially own any common stock beneficially owned by any other such director or officer (or any Affiliate thereof); and (b) neither any employee stock ownership plan or similar plan of the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation, nor any trustee with respect thereto or any Affiliate of such trustee (solely by reason of such capacity of such trustee), shall be deemed, for any purposes hereof, to beneficially own any common stock held under any such plan.
     The Board of Directors shall have the power to construe and apply the provisions of this Section and to make all determinations necessary or desirable to implement such provisions, including but not limited to matters with respect to: (a) the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by any person; (b) whether a person is an Affiliate of another; (c) whether a person has an agreement, arrangement or understanding with another as to the matters referred to in the definition of beneficial ownership; (d) the application of any other definition or operative provision of this Section to the given facts; or (e) any other matter relating to the applicability or effect of this Section.
     The Board of Directors shall have the right to demand that any person who is reasonably believed to beneficially own shares of common stock that are “excess shares” (or holds of record common stock beneficially owned by any person in excess of the limit described above) supply the Corporation with complete information as to: (a) the record owner(s) of all shares beneficially owned by such person who is reasonably believed to own shares in excess of the limit described above; and (b) any other factual matter relating to the applicability or effect of this Section as may reasonably be requested of such person.
     Special meetings of shareholders relating to changes in control of the Corporation or amendments to its Certificate of Incorporation shall be called only at the direction of the Board of Directors. This provision is perpetual, and not limited to the five (5) year period.

 

Exhibit 3.2
BYLAWS
OF
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL NEW, INC.
Adopted as of September 16, 2010

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
ARTICLE I — OFFICE
 
ARTICLE II — SHAREHOLDERS
 
Section 1. Place of Meetings
Section 2. Annual Meeting
Section 3. Special Meetings
Section 4. Conduct of Meetings
Section 5. Notice of Meetings
Section 6. Fixing of Record Date
Section 7. Voting Requirements
Section 8. Voting Lists
Section 9. Quorum
Section 10. Proxies
Section 11. Voting of Shares in the Name of Two or More Persons
Section 12. Voting of Shares by Certain Holders
Section 13. No Cumulative Voting
Section 14. Inspectors of Election
Section 15. New Business
 
ARTICLE III — BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
Section 1. General Powers
Section 2. Number and Election
Section 3. Regular Meetings
Section 4. Qualification
Section 5. Special Meetings
Section 6. Quorum
Section 7. Manner of Acting
Section 8. Action Without a Meeting
Section 9. Resignation
Section 10. Vacancies
Section 11. Compensation
Section 12. Presumption of Assent
Section 13. Removal of Directors
 
ARTICLE IV — COMMITTEES
 
Section 1. Appointment
Section 2. Audit Committee
Section 3. Nominating Committee
Section 4. Human Resources Committee
Section 5. Other Committees
Section 6. Quorum


 

 
ARTICLE V — OFFICERS
 
Section 1. Positions
Section 2. Chairman of the Board
Section 3. President
Section 4. Other Officers
Section 5. Appointment and Term of Office
Section 6. Removal
Section 7. Vacancies
Section 8. Remuneration
 
ARTICLE VI — CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
 
Section 1. Contracts
Section 2. Loans
Section 3. Checks, Drafts, etc
Section 4. Deposits
 
ARTICLE VII — CERTIFICATES FOR SHARES AND THEIR TRANSFER
 
Section 1. Certificates for Shares
Section 2. Transfer of Shares
 
ARTICLE VIII — FISCAL YEAR
 
ARTICLE IX — DIVIDENDS
 
ARTICLE X — CORPORATE SEAL
 
ARTICLE XI — INDEMNIFICATION
 
ARTICLE XII — AMENDMENTS

ii 


 

Bylaws of
Rockville Financial New, Inc.
(September 16, 2010)
ARTICLE I. OFFICE
     The home office of Rockville Financial New, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is in Rockville, Connecticut.
ARTICLE II. SHAREHOLDERS
      Section 1. Place of Meetings . All annual and special meetings of shareholders shall be held at the principal office of the Corporation or at such other place as the Board of Directors may designate from time to time.
      Section 2. Annual Meeting . A meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation for the election of Directors and for the transaction of any other business of the Corporation shall be held on such day and at such time and place as the Board of Directors may designate.
      Section 3. Special Meetings . Subject to the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation, Special meetings of the shareholders for any purpose or purposes may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the President, or the Secretary upon the written request of a majority of the Directors or the holders of not less than ten (10%) of all of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting. Such written request shall state the purpose or purposes of the meeting and shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation. Business to be transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to the purpose or purposes stated in the notice to such meeting.
      Section 4. Conduct of Meetings . Annual and special meetings shall be conducted in accordance with any requirements prescribed by applicable law or these Bylaws or adopted by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall designate, when present, either the Chairman of the Board or President to preside at such meetings.
      Section 5. Notice of Meetings . Written notice stating the place, day, and hour of the meeting and the purpose(s) for which the meeting is called shall be delivered not fewer than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, by or at the direction of the Chairman of the Board, the President, or the Secretary, to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting. If mailed, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the mail, addressed to the shareholder at the address as it appears on the stock transfer books or records of the Corporation as of the record date prescribed in Section 6 of this Article II with postage prepaid. When any shareholders’ meeting, either annual or special, is adjourned to a different date, time or place, notice need not be given of the new date, time or place if the new date, time or place is announced at the meeting before adjournment. If a new record date for the adjourned meeting is or must be fixed under the

1


 

provisions of the Connecticut Business Corporation Act, notice of the adjourned meeting must be given to persons who are shareholders as of the new record date.
      Section 6. Fixing of Record Date . For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of shareholders or any adjournment, or shareholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend, or in order to make a determination of shareholders for any other proper purpose, the Board of Directors shall fix in advance a date as the record date for any such determination of shareholders. Such date in any case shall be not more than seventy (70) days prior to the date on which the particular action, requiring such determination of shareholders, is to be taken.
      Section 7. Voting Requirements . Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in these Bylaws, in the Certificate of Incorporation, or in the Connecticut Business Corporation Act, the Connecticut Banking Laws, or other applicable law, the affirmative vote, at a meeting of shareholders duly held and at which a quorum is present, of a majority of the voting power of the shares represented at such meeting that are entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the shareholders.
      Section 8. Voting Lists . After fixing the record date for the meeting, the officer or agent having charge of the stock transfer books for shares of the Corporation shall make a complete list of the shareholders of record entitled to vote at such meeting, or any adjournment thereof, arranged in alphabetical order, with the address and the number of shares held by each. This list of shareholders shall be kept on file at the principal office of the Corporation and shall be subject to inspection by any shareholder of record, the shareholder’s agent or attorney at any time during usual business hours beginning two (2) business days after the notice of the meeting is given for which the list was prepared and continuing through the meeting. Such list shall also be produced and kept open at the time and place of the meeting and shall be subject to inspection by any shareholder of record, the shareholder’s agent or attorney during the entire time of the meeting. The original stock transfer book shall constitute prima facie evidence of the shareholders entitled to examine such list or transfer books or to vote at any meeting of shareholders.
      Section 9. Quorum . A majority of the outstanding shares of the Corporation entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of shareholders. If less than a majority of the outstanding shares is represented at a meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further notice. Once a share is represented for any purpose at a meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the meeting and for any adjournment of that meeting unless a new record date is set for that adjourned meeting. At such adjourned meeting at which a quorum shall be present or represented, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally notified. The shareholders present at a duly organized meeting may continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough shareholders to constitute less than a quorum. If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the shareholders, unless the vote of a greater number of shareholders voting together or voting by classes is required by law or the Certificate of Incorporation.

2


 

      Section 10. Proxies . At all meetings of shareholders, a shareholder may vote by proxy executed in writing by the shareholder or by his or her duly authorized attorney in fact and filed with the Secretary of the Corporation, the inspector of election or the officer or agent of the Corporation authorized to tabulate votes. A proxy shall be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation prior to the meeting to the extent required by Connecticut law. No proxy shall be valid more than eleven (11) months from the date of its execution unless a longer period is expressly provided in the appointment.
      Section 11. Voting of Shares in the Name of Two or More Persons . When ownership stands in the name of two or more persons, in the absence of written directions to the Corporation to the contrary, at any meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation any one or more of such shareholders may cast, in person or by proxy, all votes to which such ownership is entitled. In the event an attempt is made to cast conflicting votes, in person or by proxy, by the several persons in whose names shares of stock stand, the vote or votes to which those persons are entitled shall be cast as directed by a majority of those holding such and present in person or by proxy at such meeting, but no votes shall be cast for such stock if a majority cannot agree.
      Section 12. Voting of Shares by Certain Holders . Shares standing in the name of another corporation may be voted by any officer, agent, or proxy as the Bylaws of such corporation may prescribe, or, in the absence of such provision, as the Board of Directors of such corporation may determine. Shares held by an administrator, executor, guardian, or conservator may be voted by him or her, either in person or by proxy, without a transfer of such shares into his or her name. Shares outstanding in the name of a trustee may be voted by him or her, either in person or by proxy, but no trustee shall be entitled to vote shares held by him or her without a transfer of such shares into his or her name. Shares outstanding in the name of a receiver may be voted by such receiver, and shares held by or under control of a receiver may be voted by such receiver without the transfer into his or her name if authority to do so is consigned in an appropriate order of the court or other public authority by which such receiver was appointed.
     A shareholder whose shares are pledged shall be entitled to vote such shares until the shares have been transferred into the name of the pledgee, and thereafter the pledgee shall be entitled to vote the shares so transferred.
      Section 13. No Cumulative Voting . Each holder of shares of common stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share held by such holder. No holder of such shares shall be entitled to cumulative voting for any purpose, including, but not limited to, the election of Directors.
      Section 14. Inspectors of Election . In advance of any meeting of shareholders, the Board of Directors may appoint one or more inspectors to act at a meeting of shareholders and make a written report of the inspector’s determinations. In case any person appointed as inspector fails to appear or fails or refuses to act, the vacancy may be filled by appointment by the Board of Directors in advance of the meeting or at the meeting by the Chairman of the Board or the President. Each inspector shall take and sign an oath to faithfully execute the duties of inspector with strict impartiality and according to the best of the inspector’s ability. An inspector may be an officer or employee of the Corporation.

3


 

     Unless otherwise prescribed by law, the duties of such inspectors shall include: determining the number of shares outstanding and the voting power of each share, the shares represented at the meeting, and the validity of proxies and ballots; counting and tabulating all votes or consents; and determining the result.
      Section 15. New Business . Any new business to be taken up at the annual meeting other than at the direction of the Board of Directors shall be stated in writing and filed with the Secretary of the Corporation at least thirty (30) days before the date of the annual meeting, and all business so stated, proposed, and filed shall be considered at the annual meeting; but no other proposal other than at the direction of the Board of Directors shall be acted upon at the annual meeting. This provision shall not prevent the consideration and approval or disapproval at the annual meeting of reports of officers, Directors, and committees.
     Section 16. Director Nominations . Any nominations of Directors by shareholders of record shall be stated in writing and filed with the Secretary of the Corporation at least one hundred (100) days prior to any meeting of shareholders called for the election of directors; provided however, that if fewer than 100 days’ notice of the meeting is given to shareholders, such nomination shall be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation at least ten (10) business days following the earlier of (i) the date on which notice of such meeting was given to shareholders; or (ii) the date on which a public announcement of such meeting was first made. All nominations must comply with the Board of Directors’ nomination policy.
ARTICLE III. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
      Section 1. General Powers . The property, business and affairs of the Corporation shall be under the direction of its Board of Directors.
      Section 2. Number and Election . The Board of Directors shall consist of not fewer than eight (8) nor more than sixteen (16) members, with the number of Directors specified from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors, and shall be divided into four (4) classes as nearly equal in number as possible with each class consisting of no fewer than two (2) nor more than four (4) Directors. The initial Board of Directors shall consist of 13 persons. Thereafter, Directors shall be elected by the shareholders at the annual meeting of the shareholders. The members of each class shall be elected for a term of four (4) years and until their successors are elected and qualified, with the exception of Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. who may be nominated and elected to serve until the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. One class shall be elected by ballot annually.
      Section 3. Regular Meetings . A regular meeting of the Board of Directors for the appointment of officers and the transaction of any other business that may come before such meeting shall be held without other notice than this Bylaw following the annual meeting of shareholders. The Board of Directors shall meet regularly without notice at a time and place fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors. Directors may participate in a meeting by means of a conference telephone or similar communications device through which all persons participating can hear each other at the same time. Participation by such means shall constitute presence in person for all purposes.

4


 

      Section 4. Qualification . A Director need not be a resident of the State of Connecticut nor a shareholder of the Corporation, unless the Board of Directors adopts a policy including such rules. Any person under the age of twenty-five (25) is ineligible to be elected to the Board of Directors. No person aged seventy (70) years or more is eligible for election or re-election as a Director, with the exception of Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. who may be nominated and elected to serve until the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.
      Section 5. Special Meetings . Special Meetings of the Board of Directors may be held upon the call of the President or Chairman at any time; and the President or Chairman must, upon written request of any two Directors, stating the purpose thereof, call a Special Meeting to be held not less than seven (7) or more than fifty (50) days after the receipt of such request. Written notice of the date, time, place and general purpose of all Special Meetings of the Board of Directors shall be given to each Director in person or by mail to the residence or usual place of business of each Director at least five (5) days prior to the date of such meeting.
      Section 6. Quorum . A majority of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of the Board of Directors.
      Section 7. Manner of Acting . The act of the majority of the Directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board of Directors, unless a greater number is prescribed by law or by these Bylaws.
      Section 8. Action Without a Meeting . Any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors at a meeting may be taken without a meeting if one or more consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by all of the Directors and delivered to the Corporation. Such consents shall be filed with the Secretary in the minute books of the Corporation.
      Section 9. Resignation . Any Director may resign at any time by sending a written notice of such resignation to the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board or the Corporation. Such resignation shall take effect when delivered unless the notice specifies a later effective date upon receipt by the Chairman of the Board or the President.
      Section 10. Vacancies . Any vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of Directors, may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining Directors although less than a quorum of the Board of Directors. A Director elected to fill a vacancy, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of Directors, shall be elected to serve for a term expiring at the next annual meeting at which Directors are elected and which such Director’s successor shall have been elected and qualified.
      Section 11. Director Nominations . The independent members of the Board of Directors shall recommend to the full Board of Directors, by majority vote, Board nominees for election and/or re-election to the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders and candidates to

5


 

fill vacancies on the Board in between annual meetings of shareholders. In making such recommendations, the independent Directors shall consider the recommendations of the Nominating Committee but may recommend Board nominees not recommended or considered by the Nominating Committee.
     The Board of Directors shall recommend to the shareholders Board nominees for election and/or re-election to the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders and shall fill vacancies on the Board in between annual shareholder meetings from the candidates recommended by the independent Directors and in accordance with the foregoing procedure.
      Section 12. Compensation . The Board of Directors shall have authority to fix fees of Directors, including a reasonable allowance for expenses actually incurred in connection with their duties.
      Section 13. Presumption of Assent . A Director of the Corporation who is present at a meeting of the Board of Directors at which action on any association matter is taken shall be presumed to have assented to the action taken unless: (a) he or she objects at the beginning of the meeting, or promptly upon his or her arrival, to holding it or transacting business at the meeting; (b) his or her dissent or abstention from the action taken shall be entered in the minutes of the meeting; or (c) he or she shall file a written notice of such dissent or abstention to such action with the presiding officer of the meeting before the adjournment thereof or to the Corporation immediately after adjournment of the meeting. Such right to dissent or abstain shall not apply to a Director who voted in favor of such action.
      Section 14. Removal of Directors . At a meeting of shareholders called expressly for that purpose, any Director may be removed only for cause by a vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the Board of Director and eighty percent (80%) of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of Directors.
ARTICLE IV. COMMITTEES
      Section 1. Appointment . The Board of Directors, by resolution adopted by a majority of the full board, may create one or more committees and appoint members of the Board of Directors to serve on them. Each committee shall have two (2) or more members who serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The Board shall act upon Committee member nominations presented to them by the President. The designation of any committee pursuant to this Section 1 and the delegation of authority shall not operate to relieve the Board of Directors, or any Director, of any responsibility imposed by law or regulation.
      Section 2. Audit Committee . The Board of Directors shall appoint an Audit Committee of not less than three (3) members, all of whom shall be independent. At least one (1) one member shall be a financial expert in accordance with applicable federal securities law and any applicable stock listing regulations, or disclosure must be made in accordance with applicable securities disclosure rules. Audit Committee members shall serve for one (1) year and until they are reappointed or others are appointed in their stead. The Audit Committee shall, annually, have an audit or examination of the books, records, accounts and affairs of the Corporation made by certified public accountants selected by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Connecticut

6


 

General Statutes and applicable federal securities laws. The Audit Committee shall have authority to determine what other or further audits or examinations of the Corporation or its affairs shall be made, the extent thereof and by whom the same shall be made and to arrange therefore.
      Section 3. Nominating Committee . A Nominating Committee of not less than three (3) Directors, all of whom shall be independent, shall be appointed annually by the Board of Directors to nominate persons for election and/or re-election in accordance with applicable federal securities laws and any applicable stock listing regulations. The Nominating Committee shall recommend to the independent members of the Board of Directors, Board nominees for election and/or re-election to the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders and candidates to fill vacancies on the Board in between annual meetings of shareholders. The Nominating Committee shall operate pursuant to a Director Nominations Policy approved by the entire Board.
      Section 4. Human Resources Committee. A Human Resources Committee of not less than three (3) Directors, all of whom shall be independent as required by applicable federal securities law and any applicable stock listing regulations shall be established. The Human Resources Committee shall have authority with respect to certain compensation issues as required by law, as delegated by the Board of Directors, and/or as prescribed by the Committee’s Charter. The Human Resources Committee shall operate pursuant to a Charter approved by the Committee and the entire Board.
      Section 5. Other Committees . The Board of Directors may by resolution establish other committees composed of Directors as they may determine to be necessary or appropriate for the conduct of the business of the Corporation and may prescribe the duties, constitution, and procedures thereof.
      Section 6. Quorum . A majority of the members of any Committee shall constitute a quorum, and the vote of a majority of the members present at a meeting shall be the act of the Committee.
ARTICLE V. OFFICERS
      Section 1. Positions . The officers of the Corporation shall be a Chairman of the Board of Directors, if the Directors so determine, a President, one or more Vice Presidents, a Secretary, and a Treasurer or Chief Financial Officer, each of whom shall be elected by the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board and the President shall be members of the Board of Directors. The same person may not serve as both Chairman of the Board and President. The Board of Directors may designate one or more Vice Presidents as Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President or other designation. The Board of Directors may also elect or authorize the appointment of such other officers as the business of the Corporation may require. The officers shall have such authority and perform such duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time authorize or determine. In the absence of action by the Board of Directors, the officers shall have such powers and duties as generally pertain to their respective offices. Except as otherwise provided herein, any two (2) or more offices may be held by the same person.

7


 

      Section 2. Chairman of the Board . It shall be the duty of the Chairman of the Board, if there be one, to preside, when present, at all meetings of the Board of Directors. The Chairman shall perform such duties and have such powers as may from time to time be prescribed by statutes or by these Bylaws, or by the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board of Directors may not serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
      Section 3. President . The President shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and shall have the active management of the business, property and affairs of the Corporation, subject to the authority of the Board of Directors and subject to the provisions of the foregoing Section 2. If there be no Chairman of the Board of Directors, or in the absence of the Chairman, he or she may preside at meetings of the Board of Directors, or with his or her approval a chairman of the meeting may be appointed to preside. He or she shall perform such duties and have such powers as are incident to the office of the President and as may from time to time be prescribed by statute or by these Bylaws, or by the Board of Directors.
      Section 4. Other Officers . Other officers, if any, shall have such powers and perform such duties as are incident to the respective offices that they hold and as may from time to time be prescribed by statute or these Bylaws or by the Board of Directors or the President.
      Section 5. Appointment and Term of Office . The officers of the Corporation shall be appointed annually at the first meeting of the Board of Directors held after each annual meeting of the shareholders. If the appointment of officers is not made at such meeting, such appointment shall be held as soon thereafter as possible. Each officer shall hold office until a successor has been duly appointed and qualified or until the officer’s death, resignation or removal in the manner hereinafter provided. Appointment of an officer, employee, or agent shall not of itself create contractual rights. The Board of Directors may authorize the Corporation to enter into an employment contract with any officer in accordance with applicable regulations; but no such contract shall impair the right of the Board of Directors to remove any officer at any time in accordance with Section 6 of this Article V.
      Section 6. Removal . Any officer may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time with or without cause. An officer’s removal does not affect the officer’s contract rights, if any, with the Corporation.
      Section 7. Vacancies . A vacancy in any office because of death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or otherwise may be filled by the Board of Directors for the unexpired portion of the term.
      Section 8. Remuneration . The remuneration of the named executive officers shall be determined by, or at the direction of, the Board of Directors or the Human Resources Committee pursuant to policies developed by such bodies from time to time in compliance with applicable law, regulations and rules.

8


 

ARTICLE VI. CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
      Section 1. Contracts . Except as otherwise prescribed by law or these Bylaws with respect to certificates for shares and subject always to the directions of the Board of Directors, the President may authorize any officer, employee, or agent of the Corporation to enter into any contract or execute and deliver any instrument in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation. Such authority may be general or confined to specific instances.
      Section 2. Loans . Subject always to the specific directions of the Board of Directors, no loans shall be contracted on behalf of the Corporation and no evidence of indebtedness shall be issued in its name unless executed in its name by the President or such officer as may be designated by the President. Such authority may be general or confined to specific instances.
      Section 3. Checks, Drafts, etc . Subject always to the specific directions of the Board of Directors, all checks, drafts, or other orders for the payment of money, notes, or other evidences of indebtedness issued in the name of the Corporation shall be signed by one or more officers, employees or agents of the Corporation in such manner as shall from time to time be determined by the President.
      Section 4. Deposits . All funds of the Corporation not otherwise employed shall be deposited from time to time to the credit of the Corporation in any duly authorized depositories as the Board of Directors may select.
ARTICLE VII. CERTIFICATES FOR SHARES AND THEIR TRANSFER
      Section 1. Certificates for Shares . The shares of the Corporation’s stock may be certificated or uncertificated, as provided under the [Connecticut Business Corporation Act], and shall be entered into the books of the Corporation and registered as they are issued. Any registered shareholder shall be entitled to a physical stock certificate upon written request to the transfer agent or registrar of the Corporation. In the case of certified shares, certificates representing shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be in such form as shall be determined by the Board of Directors and permitted by law. Such certificates shall be signed by the Chief Executive Officer or by any other officer of the Corporation authorized by the Board of Directors, attested by the Chief Financial Officer, and sealed with the corporate seal or a facsimile thereof. The signatures of such officers upon a certificate may be facsimiles if the certificate is manually signed on behalf of a transfer agent or a registrar other than the Corporation itself or one of its employees. Each certificate for shares of capital stock shall be consecutively numbered or otherwise identified. The name and address of the person to whom the shares are issued, with the owner of shares and date of issue, shall be entered on the stock transfer books of the Corporation. All certificates surrendered to the Corporation for transfer shall be cancelled and no new certificate shall be issued until the former certificate, if such shares were represented by a certificate, for a like number of shares has been surrendered and cancelled, except that in the case of a lost or destroyed certificate, a new certificate may be

9


 

issued upon such terms and indemnity to the Corporation as the Board of Directors may prescribe.
      Section 2. Transfer of Shares . Subject to any applicable restrictions on transfer and ownership of securities, and unless otherwise provided by the Board of Directors, transfers of capital stock of the Corporation, if such stock is certificated, shall be made only on its stock transfer books. Authority for such transfer shall be given only by the holder of record or by his or her legal representative, who shall furnish proper evidence of such authority, or by his or her attorney authorized by a duly executed power of attorney filed with the Corporation. Such transfer shall be made only on surrender for cancellation of the certificate for such shares. The person in whose name shares of capital stock stand on the books of the Corporation shall be deemed by the Corporation to be the owner for all purposes.
     Upon the receipt of proper transfer instructions from the registered owner of uncertificated shares, the Corporation shall cancel the uncertificated shares and issue new equivalent uncertificated shares or certificated shares to the shareholder entitled thereto. Such transfers of stock shall be recorded on the books of the Corporation kept at an office of the Corporation or by transfer agents designated to transfer shares of the stock of the Corporation. Any or all of the signatures required by this Section may be made by facsimile.
ARTICLE VIII. FISCAL YEAR
     The fiscal year of the Corporation shall end on the 31st day of December of each year.
ARTICLE IX. DIVIDENDS
     The Board of Directors may authorize and the Corporation may pay dividends and make distributions to shareholders to the extent permitted by law. Such dividends will be payable to shareholders of record at the close of business on the date determined by the Board of Directors provided that if the Board of Directors does not designate the record date for determining shareholders entitled to a distribution, it shall be the date the Board of Directors authorizes the distribution. Such distribution shall be paid on a named day not more than seventy (70) days thereafter, and the Directors may further close the transfer books during the period from the day as of which the right to such dividend is determined through the day upon which the same is to be paid. No dividend shall be paid unless duly voted by the Directors of the Corporation. Dividends may be paid in cash, property, or shares of the Corporation.
ARTICLE X. CORPORATE SEAL
     The seal of the Corporation shall have inscribed thereon the name of the Corporation and the words “Seal” and “Connecticut”.

10


 

ARTICLE XI. INDEMNIFICATION
     The Corporation shall indemnify and reimburse each current and former Director, officer or employee of this Corporation, or any other agent or person performing on behalf of the Corporation, and his or her heirs, executors, or administrators, to the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to those situations for which reimbursement and indemnification is permitted under Sections 33-770 through 33-778, inclusive, of the Connecticut General Statutes. In no event shall any payments made by the Corporation pursuant to this Article XI exceed the amount permissible under state or federal law, including but not limited to the limitations on indemnification imposed by Section 18(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
ARTICLE XII. AMENDMENTS
     These Bylaws may be amended by: (i) the approval of the amendment by a majority vote of the Board of Directors; or (ii) a majority vote of the votes cast by the shareholders of the Corporation at any meeting providing that an amendment by the shareholders to the provisions of Articles II, III or XII shall require a vote of not less than eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation. No Bylaws shall be amended or repealed unless written notice of such proposed action shall have been given with respect to the meeting at which such action shall be taken.
     The Undersigned hereby certifies that these Bylaws have been adopted by a majority or more of the Directors of Rockville Financial New, Inc. this 16th day of September, 2010
         
     
  /s/ Judy Keppner Clark    
  Judy Keppner Clark, Secretary   
     
 

11

Exhibit 5.1
(HINCKLEY ALLEN SNYDER LLP LOGO)
September 16, 2010
Rockville Financial New, Inc.
P.O. Box 660
Rockville, CT 06066
Ladies and Gentlemen:
     We have acted as counsel to Rockville Financial New, Inc., a Connecticut corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by the Company of an aggregate of 29,545,455 shares of Common Stock, no par value per share (the “Shares”), of the Company and the related preparation and filing by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”). In rendering the opinion set forth below, we do not express any opinion concerning the laws of any jurisdiction other than the federal law of the United States of America and the corporate law of the State of Connecticut.
     We have examined and relied upon originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified, of such documents, corporate records and other instruments, and have examined such matters of law, as we have deemed necessary or advisable for purposes of rendering the opinion set forth below. As to matters of fact, we have examined and relied upon the representations of the Company contained in the Registration Statement and, where we have deemed appropriate, representations or certificates of officers of the Company or public officials and we have made no independent verification or investigation of the factual matters set forth therein. We have assumed, with your consent, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons and the conformity to the originals of all documents submitted to us as facsimile, certified, or photostatic copies and the authenticity of the originals of such copies. In making our examination of any documents, we have assumed, with your consent, that all parties had the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform all obligations thereunder, and, as to such parties, we have also assumed, with your consent, the due authorization by all requisite action, the due execution and delivery of such documents and the validity and binding effect and enforceability thereof.
     Based on the foregoing and subject to the limitations, qualifications, exceptions and assumptions set forth herein, we are of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Shares to be issued and sold by the Company have been duly authorized by the requisite corporate action on the part of the Company and, when issued and sold as contemplated

 


 

in the Registration Statement, will be validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and non-assessable.
     In rendering the opinion set forth above, we have not passed upon and do not purport to pass upon the application of securities or “blue-sky” laws of any jurisdiction (except federal securities laws).
     This opinion is limited to the matters stated herein and no opinion is implied or may be inferred beyond the matters expressly stated. The opinion set forth herein is rendered as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update any facts or circumstances which may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in any laws, regulations or court decisions which may hereafter occur.
     We consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Legal Matters” in the Prospectus which is part of such Registration Statement.
Very Truly Yours,
/s/ Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP
HINCKLEY, ALLEN & SNYDER, LLP

 

Exhibit 10.8
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement
for
Joseph F. Jeamel Jr.
     This Agreement, made this 27th day of January, 2004, by and between Rockville Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Employer”) and Joseph F. Jeamel Jr. (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”).
WITNESSETH THAT:
     WHEREAS, the Executive is and will be rendering valuable services to the Employer in his capacity as an executive officer, and
     WHEREAS, the Employer desires to ensure that it will continue to have the benefit of the Executive’s services, and
     WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to assist the Executive in providing for the financial requirements of the Executive in the event of his retirement or termination of employment.
     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 


 

     1.  SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT .
          A. Retirement Benefit . Upon the Executive’s retirement or the termination of the Executive’s employment for any reason other than death, the Executive shall be entitled to receive pursuant to this Agreement an annual benefit of Twenty-Seven Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-Six Dollars ($27,636) payable for twenty (20) years.
          B. Death Benefit . In the event of the Executive’s death while in the employ of the Employer, the Executive’s beneficiary designated on Exhibit A attached hereto in accordance with the provisions of this Section 1.B. (the “Beneficiary”) shall be entitled to receive the Retirement Benefit that would otherwise have been provided to the Executive pursuant to Section 1.A. above. In the event of the death of the Executive after the commencement of payment of the Retirement Benefit provided pursuant to Section 1.A. above, payment shall continue to be made to the Executive’s Beneficiary in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the annual benefit that the Executive was receiving at the time of death until such annual benefit shall have been paid to the Executive and his Beneficiary for a total period of twenty (20) years. The Executive shall have the right, at any time, to designate Beneficiary(ies) (both primary as well as contingent) to receive the death benefit payable under this Section 1.B.. The Beneficiary designated under this Agreement may be the same as or different from the beneficiary designated under any other plan of or agreement with the Employer. The Executive shall designate his Beneficiary by completing and signing the beneficiary designation form attached hereto as Exhibit A and returning it to the Senior Vice

2


 

President, Human Resources for the Employer. The Executive shall have the right to change his Beneficiary by completing, signing and otherwise complying with the terms of the beneficiary designation form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Upon the acceptance by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of the Employer of a new beneficiary designation form, all Beneficiary designations previously filed shall be canceled. The Employer shall be entitled to rely on the last beneficiary designation form filed by the Executive and accepted by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of the Employer prior to the Executive’s death. In the event of the death of the Executive without a designated Beneficiary, any benefits remaining to be paid under this Agreement to the Executive shall be paid to the Executive’s estate.
     2.  TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BENEFIT . The annual benefit payable in accordance with Section 1 hereof shall be paid in monthly installments on the first day of each month commencing on the first day of the month immediately following the Executive’s retirement, termination of employment or death. Monthly installments of benefits shall cease to be paid after 240 months of installments have been paid to the Executive, his Beneficiary or both, as the case may be.
     3.  FORFEITURE UPON TERMINATION FOR CAUSE . Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if the Executive’s employment is “Terminated for “Cause” prior to a “Change in Control”, as such terms are defined in the Employer’s Phantom Stock Plan, the annual benefit payable in accordance with Section 1. A. or Section 1.B. hereof shall be forfeited. If the Executive or his Beneficiary has received any monthly installments of

3


 

the annual benefit payable in accordance with Section 1. A. or Section 1.B. hereof and it is subsequently determined that the Executive was Terminated for Cause prior to a Change in Control, then the monthly installments previously paid shall be returned by the Executive or his Beneficiary, as the case may be, to the Employer, and no further monthly installments shall be payable under this Agreement. The provisions of this Section 3 shall not apply in the event that the Executive’s employment is Terminated for Cause in connection with a Change in Control, in which case the Executive’s benefit shall be payable as otherwise provided in this Agreement.
     4.  ABSENCE OF FUNDING . Benefits payable pursuant to this Agreement shall not be funded, and the Employer shall not be required to segregate or earmark any of its assets for the benefit of the Executive. Such benefits shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, transfer or assignment by the Executive, and any attempt to anticipate, alienate, transfer or assign these benefits shall be void. The Executive shall have only the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Employer for the benefits hereunder.
     5.  MISCELLANEOUS .
          A. This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto, but no amendment shall operate to give the Executive, either directly or indirectly, any interest whatsoever in any funds or assets of the Employer, except the right to receive the payments herein provided.

4


 

          B. This Agreement shall not supersede any contract of employment, whether oral or in writing, between the Employer and the Executive, nor shall it affect or impair the rights and obligations of the Employer and the Executive, respectively, thereunder. Nothing contained herein shall impose any obligation on the Employer to continue the employment of the Executive.
          C. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Connecticut, except to the extent that such laws are preempted by Federal law.
          D. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors of the Employer. The Employer shall require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Employer to expressly assume and agree to perform the obligations of the Employer under this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Employer would have been required to perform such obligations if no such succession had taken place and such assumption shall be an express condition to the consummation of any such purchase, merger, consolidation or other transaction.
          E. The Employer shall be responsible for the administration of this Agreement and shall have the sole discretion to determine all questions arising in connection with the Agreement, to interpret the provisions of the Agreement and to construe all of its terms.

5


 

All such actions of the Employer shall be conclusive and binding upon the Executive, his Beneficiary and other persons. Claims for benefits under this Agreement shall be decided in accordance with the claims procedures provisions set forth in the Employer’s 401(k) Plan, which are incorporated herein by this reference.
          F. The Employer may withhold from any benefit payable under this Agreement an amount sufficient to satisfy its tax withholding obligations.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer and the Executive have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
             
    ROCKVILLE BANK    
 
           
 
  By   /s/ William J. McGurk    
 
           
 
      Its President    
 
           
 
      /s/ Joseph F. Jeamel    
 
           
 
      Joseph F. Jeamel    

6


 

EXHIBIT A
BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION
Subject to the conditions and provisions of the Agreement and subject to the right reserved therein to change the Beneficiary, the Beneficiary designation with respect to the Death Benefit which may become payable under the Agreement shall be as follows:
     
Primary:
   
 
   
 
  Name
 
   
 
   
 
  Address
 
   
First Contingent:
   
 
   
 
  Name
 
   
 
   
 
  Address
 
   
Second Contingent:
   
 
   
 
  Name
 
   
 
   
 
  Address
If, however, no Beneficiary hereinbefore designated is living at my death, any Death Benefit which may become payable under the Agreement shall be payable to the executor or administrator of my estate.
             
Signed at
           
 
           
 
  (City and State)       (Date)
 
           
 
           
         
Joseph F. Jeamel Jr.       (Signature of Witness)
 
          Print Name:

7

Exhibit 10.10
SPLIT-DOLLAR AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 18 th day of October, 1993, by and between THE SAVINGS BANK OF ROCKVILLE, a Connecticut corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Employer”), and JOSEPH F. JEAMEL, JR. of Vernon, Connecticut (hereinafter referred to as the “Employee”).
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the Employee is employed by the Employer; and
WHEREAS, the Employer is desirous of retaining the services of the Employee and of assisting the Employee in paying for life insurance on his own life; and
WHEREAS, the Employer has determined that this assistance can be provided under a split dollar life insurance arrangement; and
WHEREAS, the Employee has applied for, and is the owner of the insurance policy or policies listed in Schedule A attached hereto, hereinafter referred to as the “Policy”, and
WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee agree to make the Policy subject to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Employee has assigned the Policy to the Employer as collateral for amounts to be advanced by the Employer under this Agreement by an instrument of assignment filed with the Insurer (hereinafter referred to as the “Assignment”);

 


 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants herein contained, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
  1.   The Parties hereto agree that the Policy shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and of the Assignment filed with the Insurer relating to the Policy. The Employee shall be the sole and absolute owner of the Policy and may exercise all ownership rights granted to the owner thereof by the terms of the Policy, except as may be otherwise provided herein and in the Assignment.
 
  2.   Any dividend declared on the Policy shall be applied to purchase paid-up additional insurance on the life of the Employee. The Parties hereto agree that the dividend election provisions of the Policy shall conform to the provisions hereof.
 
  3.   The premium for the Policy will be paid by the Employer during the Employee’s employment by the Employer and will be allocated between the Employee and the Employer. The Employee’s share of the premium (term insurance allocation) shall be paid by the Employer as agent for the Employee and shall be charged to the Employee as cash compensation, and for all purposes, including the Assignment, shall be deemed cash compensation and not Employer paid premium.
 
  4.   The Assignment shall not be terminated, altered or amended by the Employee without the express written consent of the Employer. The Parties hereto agree to take reasonable action to cause such Assignment to conform to the provisions of this Agreement.
  5.   a. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Employee shall not sell, assign, transfer, borrow against, surrender or cancel the Policy, change the beneficiary designation provision thereof,

 


 

      or terminate the dividend election thereof without, in any such case, the express written consent of the Employer.
b. The Employer shall not borrow against the Policy without the express written consent of the Employee.
c. Upon the Employee’s attainment of age sixty-five (65), the Employee shall have the right to alter the dividend option and the right to take any action with regard to the cash value of the policy in excess of the collaterally assigned interest of the Employer.
  6.   a. Upon the death of the Employee, the Employer shall promptly take all action necessary to obtain its share of the death benefit provided under the Policy.
b. The Employer shall have the unqualified right to receive a portion of such Death Benefit equal to the total amount of its share of the premiums paid by it hereunder (hereinafter referred to as the “Net Premiums”) without interest. The balance of the death benefit provided under the Policy, if any, shall be paid directly by the Insurer to the beneficiary or beneficiaries and in the manner designated by the Employee. No amount shall be paid from such death benefit to the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the Employee until the Employer or Insurer acknowledges in writing that the full amount due to the Employer hereunder has been paid. The Parties hereto agree that the beneficiary designation provision of the Policy shall conform to the provisions hereof.
  7.   The Employer shall not merge or consolidate into or with another organization, or reorganize, or sell substantially all of its assets to another organization, firm or person unless and until such succeeding or continuing organization, firm or person agrees to assume and discharge

 


 

      the obligations of the Employer under this Agreement. Upon the occurrence of such event, the term “Employer” as used in this Agreement shall be deemed to refer to such successor or survivor organization. The obligations continuing hereunder shall require future payments of premiums only if (a) Employee’s employment continues with such organization, firm or person or (b) an agreement or arrangement beyond this Agreement so requires.
  8.   This Agreement shall terminate upon the Employee’s death and the payment of proceeds pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement.
 
  9.   a. If the employee ceases to be employed by the employer for whatever reason, the Employee has the right to continue to keep the Policy in force either individually or through a subsequent Employer, subject to the requirement that the Policy cash value not be reduced through loans, premium payment options, or in any other manner below the amount needed to repay the Employer the Net Premiums paid by it hereunder.
b. If the Employee continues to keep the Policy in force, termination of this Agreement shall be pursuant to Section 8 of this Agreement.
c. If the Employee does not continue to keep the Policy in force, this Agreement will terminate immediately and the Employer will be repaid an amount equal to the lesser of Net Premiums paid by the Employer or the cash surrender value as of the date of the Employee’s termination of Employment.
  10.   The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall take precedence over any provisions of the Assignment. The Employer agrees not to exercise any right possessed by it under the Assignment except in conformity with this Agreement.

 


 

  11.   This Agreement may not be amended, altered or modified except by a written instrument signed by both of the Parties hereto and may not be otherwise terminated except as provided herein.
 
  12.   a. The split-dollar arrangement contemplated herein is an exempt welfare plan under regulations promulgated under Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”).
b. For purposes of ERISA, the Employer will be the “named fiduciary” and “plan administrator” of the split-dollar arrangement contemplated herein, and this Agreement is hereby designated as the written plan instrument.
c. The Employee or any beneficiary of his may file a request for benefits with the plan administrator. If a claim request is wholly or partially denied, the plan administrator will furnish to the claimant a notice of its decision within ninety (90) days in writing, and in a manner to be understood by the claimant, which notice will contain the following information:
  (i)   the specific reason or reasons for the denial;
 
  (ii)   specific reference to pertinent plan provisions upon which the denial is based;
 
  (iii)   a description of any additional material or information necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation as to why such material or information is necessary.

 


 

  (iv)   an explanation of the plan’s claim-review procedure describing the steps to be taken by a claimant who wishes to submit his claim for review.
  d.   A claimant or his authorized representative may, with respect to any denied claim,
  (i)   request a review upon written application filed within sixty (60) days after receipt by the claimant of written notice of the denial of his claim;
 
  (ii)   review pertinent documents; and
 
  (iii)   submit issues and comments in writing.
Any request or submission will be in writing and will be directed to the plan administrator. The plan administrator will have the sole responsibility for the review of any denied claim and will take all appropriate steps in light of its findings. The plan administrator will render a decision upon review of a denied claim within sixty (60) days after receipt of a request for review. If special circumstances warrant additional time, the decision will be rendered as soon as possible, but not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of request for review. Written notice of any such extension will be furnished to the claimant prior to the commencement of the extension. The decision on review will be in writing and will include specific reasons for the decision written in a manner to be understood by the claimant, as well as the specific references of the pertinent provisions of the plan on which the decision is based. If the decision on review is not furnished to the claimant within the time limits described above, the claim will be deemed denied on review.

 


 

  13.   This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Employer and its successors and assignees and the Employee and his successors, assignees, heirs, executors, administrators and beneficiaries.
 
  14.   Except as may be preempted by ERISA, the Agreement, and the rights of the Parties hereunder, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Connecticut.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Agreement to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized and the Employee has hereunto set his hand and seal, all as of the day and year first above written.
         
  THE SAVINGS BANK OF ROCKVILLE

 
 
  By /s/ William J. McGurk    
  William J. McGurk   
  Title:   President   
 
     
  /s/ Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.    
  Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.   
     

 


 

         
SCHEDULE A
                 
Insurance Carrier   Policy No.     Face Amount  
Guardian Life Insurance Company
    3745602     $ 123,950  

 

Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC. AND ROCKVILLE BANK
Subsidiary of Rockville Financial, Inc .:
Rockville Bank
Subsidiaries of Rockville Bank:
SBR Mortgage Company
SBR Investment Corp., Inc.
Rockville Financial Services, Inc .
Rockville Bank Commercial Properties, Inc.
Rockville Bank Residential Properties, Inc.
Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc.

Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated March 10, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 of Rockville Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in the prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, CT
September 16, 2010

Exhibit 23.3
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
          We consent to the use in the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Rockville Financial New, Inc. our report dated March 10, 2010 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of Rockville Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rockville Financial, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Registration Statement.
/s/  Wolf & Company, P.C.
 
Boston, Massachusetts
September 16, 2010

 

Exhibit 23.4
     
RP ® FINANCIAL, LC.
 
   
Serving the Financial Services Industry Since 1988
   
September 15, 2010
Boards of Directors
Rockville Financial, MHC
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
1645 Ellington Road
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Members of the Boards of Directors:
     We hereby consent to the use of our firm’s name in the Form S-1 Registration Statement for Rockville Financial, Inc. and in the Application for Conversion of a Mutual Holding Company to a Capital Stock Holding Company to the Banking Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Banking, in each case as amended and supplemented. We also hereby consent to the inclusion of, summary of and reference to our Appraisal and our statements concerning subscription rights and liquidation rights in such filings including the prospectus of Rockville Financial, Inc.
Sincerely,
/s/ RP FINANCIAL, LC.
RP FINANCIAL, LC.
     
 
     
Washington Headquarters
   
Three Ballston Plaza
  Telephone: (703) 528-1700
1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 1100
  Fax No.: (703) 528-1788
Arlington, VA 22201
  Toll-Free No.: (866) 723-0594
www.rpfinancial.com
  E-Mail: mail@rpfinancial.com

Exhibit 99.1
RP ® FINANCIAL, LC.
Serving the Financial Services Industry Since 1988
July 26, 2010
Mr. Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
Executive Vice President
Rockville Financial, Inc.
25 Park Street
Vernon Rockville, Connecticut 06066
Dear Mr. Jeamel:
     This letter sets forth the agreement between Rockville Bank, Vernon Rockville, Connecticut (the “Bank”), the wholly-owned subsidiary of Rockville Financial, Inc. (the “Company”), which in turn is the majority-owned subsidiary of Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. (the “MHC”), and RP ® Financial, LC. (“RP Financial”), whereby RP Financial will provide the independent conversion appraisal services in conjunction with the second step conversion transaction by the Company. The scope, timing and fee structure for these appraisal services are described below.
     These appraisal services will be directed by Ronald S. Riggins and/or William E. Pommerening, Managing Directors, with the assistance of a team of senior members of RP Financial and appropriate research staff.
Description of Appraisal Services
     In conjunction with these appraisal services, RP Financial will conduct a financial due diligence, including on-site interviews of senior management and reviews of historical and pro forma financial information and other documents and records, to gain insight into the operations, financial condition, profitability, market area, risks and various internal and external factors of the Company, all of which will be considered in estimating the pro forma market value of the Company in accordance with the applicable regulatory appraisal guidelines. RP Financial will prepare a detailed written valuation report of the Company that will be fully consistent with applicable regulatory appraisal guidelines and standard pro forma valuation practices. The appraisal report will include an analysis of the Company’s financial condition and operating results, as well as an assessment of the Company’s interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The appraisal report will incorporate an evaluation of the Company’s business strategies, market area, prospects for the future and the intended use of proceeds. A peer group analysis relative to certain relatively comparable publicly-traded banking companies will be conducted for the purpose of determining appropriate valuation adjustments for the Company relative to the peer group’s pricing ratios.
     We will review pertinent sections of the Company’s prospectus and conduct discussions with representatives of the Company to obtain necessary data and information for the appraisal report, including key deal elements such as dividend policy, use of proceeds, reinvestment rate, tax rate, offering expenses, and characteristics of stock plans.
     
Washington Headquarters    
Three Ballston Plaza   Direct: (703) 647-6543
1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 1100   Telephone: (703) 528-1700
Arlington, VA 22201   Fax No.: (703) 528-1788
E-Mail: rriggins@rpfinancial.com   Toll-Free No.: (866) 723-0594

 


 

Mr. Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
July 26, 2010
Page 2
     The original appraisal report will establish a midpoint pro forma market value in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. The appraisal report may be periodically updated throughout the conversion process, and there will be at least one updated appraisal that would be prepared at the time of the closing of the stock offering to determine the number of shares to be issued in accordance with the conversion regulations. In the event of a syndicated community offering, it will be necessary to file an update in conjunction with the close of the subscription offering and prior to the pricing phase in the syndicated community offering.
     RP Financial agrees to deliver the original appraisal report and subsequent updates, in writing, to the Company at the above address in conjunction with the filing of the regulatory conversion applications and amendments thereto. Subsequent updates will be filed promptly as certain events occur which would warrant the preparation and filing of such appraisal updates pursuant to regulatory guidelines. Further, RP Financial agrees to perform such other services as are necessary or required in connection with the regulatory review of the appraisal and respond to the regulatory comments, if any, regarding the valuation original appraisal and subsequent updates.
     In the event of a syndicated community offering phase, RP Financial will participate in the various all hands calls regarding the offering results, pricing discussions and timing.
     RP Financial expects to formally present the appraisal report, including the appraisal methodology, peer group selection and assumptions, to the Board of Directors for review and consideration. If appropriate, RP Financial will present subsequent updates to the Board. It is understood that this appraisal may be presented either in person or telephonically.
Fee Structure and Payment Schedule
     The Company agrees to pay RP Financial fees for preparation and delivery of the original appraisal report and subsequent appraisal updates as shown in the detail below, plus reimbursable expenses. Payment of these fees shall be made according to the following schedule:
    $10,000 upon execution of this letter of agreement engaging RP Financial’s appraisal services;
 
    $90,000 upon delivery of the completed original appraisal report; and
 
    $10,000 upon delivery of each subsequent appraisal update report required in conjunction with the regulatory application and stock offering. It is anticipated that there will be at least one appraisal update report, specifically the update to be prepared in conjunction with the completion of the stock offering.
     The Company will reimburse RP Financial for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in preparation of the original appraisal and subsequent updates. Such out-of-pocket expenses will likely include travel, printing, telephone, facsimile, shipping, reasonable counsel fees, computer and data services, and will not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate, without the Company’s authorization to exceed this level.

 


 

Mr. Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
July 26, 2010
Page 3
     In the event the Company shall, for any reason, discontinue the proposed transaction prior to delivery of the completed original appraisal report or subsequent updates and payment of the corresponding fees, the Company agrees to compensate RP Financial according to RP Financial’s standard billing rates for consulting services based on accumulated and verifiable time expenses, not to exceed the respective fee caps noted above, after applying full credit to the initial retainer fee towards such payment, together with reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, subject to the cap on such expenses as set forth above. RP Financial’s standard billing rates range from $75 per hour for research associates to $400 per hour for managing directors.
     If during the course of the proposed transaction, unforeseen events occur so as to materially change the nature or the work content of the services described in this contract, the terms of said contract shall be subject to renegotiation by the Company and RP Financial. Such unforeseen events shall include, but not be limited to, material changes to the structure of the transaction such as inclusion of a simultaneous business combination transaction, material changes in the conversion regulations, appraisal guidelines or processing procedures as they relate to conversion appraisals, material changes in management or procedures, operating policies or philosophies, and excessive delays or suspension of processing of conversion applications by the regulators such that completion of the conversion transaction requires the preparation by RP Financial of a new appraisal.
Covenants, Representations and Warranties
     The Company and RP Financial agree to the following:
     1. The Company agrees to make available or to supply to RP Financial such information with respect to its business and financial condition as RP Financial may reasonably request in order to provide the aforesaid valuation. Such information heretofore or hereafter supplied or made available to RP Financial shall include: annual financial statements, periodic regulatory filings and material agreements, debt instruments, off balance sheet assets or liabilities, commitments and contingencies, unrealized gains or losses and corporate books and records. All information provided by the Company to RP Financial shall remain strictly confidential (unless such information is otherwise made available to the public), and if the conversion is not consummated or the services of RP Financial are terminated hereunder, RP Financial shall promptly return to the Company the original and any copies of such information.
     2. The Company represents and warrants to RP Financial that any information provided to RP Financial does not and will not, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, at the times it is provided to RP Financial, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or in response to informational requests by RP Financial fail to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not false or misleading in light of the circumstances under which they were made.
     3. (a) The Company agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless RP Financial, any affiliates of RP Financial, the respective members, officers, agents and employees of RP Financial or their successors and assigns who act for or on behalf of RP Financial in connection with the services called for under this agreement (hereinafter referred to as “RP Financial”), from and against any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees, and all losses and expenses in connection with claims under the

 


 

Mr. Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
July 26, 2010
Page 4
federal securities laws) attributable to (i) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in the financial statements or other information furnished or otherwise provided by the Company to RP Financial, either orally or in writing; (ii) the omission or alleged omission of a material fact from the financial statements or other information furnished or otherwise made available by the Company to RP Financial; or (iii) any action or omission to act by the Company, or the Company’s respective officers, directors, employees or agents, which action or omission is undertaken in bad faith or is negligent. The Company will be under no obligation to indemnify RP Financial hereunder if a court determines that RP Financial was negligent or acted in bad faith with respect to any actions or omissions of RP Financial related to a matter for which indemnification is sought hereunder. Reasonable time devoted by RP Financial to situations for which RP Financial is deemed entitled to indemnification hereunder, shall be an indemnifiable cost payable by the Company at the normal hourly professional rate chargeable by such employee.
     (b) RP Financial shall give written notice to the Company of such claim or facts within thirty days of the assertion of any claim or discovery of material facts upon which RP Financial intends to base a claim for indemnification hereunder, including the name of counsel that RP Financial intends to engage in connection with any indemnification related matter. In the event the Company elects, within seven days of the receipt of the original notice thereof, to contest such claim by written notice to RP Financial, the Company shall not be obligated to make payments under Section 3(c), but RP Financial will be entitled to be paid any amounts payable by the Company hereunder within five days after the final non-appealable determination of such contest either by written acknowledgement of the Company or a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction or alternative adjudication forum, unless it is determined in accordance with Section 3(c) hereof that RP Financial is not entitled to indemnity hereunder. If the Company does not so elect to contest a claim for indemnification by RP Financial hereunder, RP Financial shall (subject to the Company’s receipt of the written statement and undertaking under Section 3(c) hereof) be paid promptly and in any event within thirty days after receipt by the Company of detailed billing statements or invoices for which RP Financial is entitled to reimbursement under Section 3(c) hereof.
     (c) Subject to the Company’s right to contest under Section 3(b) hereof, the Company shall pay for or reimburse the reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by RP Financial in advance of the final disposition of any proceeding within thirty days of the receipt of such request if RP Financial furnishes the Company: (1) a written statement of RP Financial’s good faith belief that it is entitled to indemnification hereunder; (2) a written undertaking to repay the advance if it ultimately is determined in a final, non-appealable adjudication of such proceeding that it or he is not entitled to such indemnification; and (3) a detailed invoice of the expenses for which reimbursement is sought.
     (d) In the event the Company does not pay any indemnified loss or make advance reimbursements of expenses in accordance with the terms of this agreement, RP Financial shall have all remedies available at law or in equity to enforce such obligation.
     This agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Company and RP Financial concerning the subject matter addressed herein, and such contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the Commonwealth of Virginia. This agreement may not be modified, supplemented or amended except by written agreement executed by both parties.

 


 

Mr. Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr.
July 26, 2010
Page 5
     The Company and RP Financial are not affiliated, and neither the Company nor RP Financial has an economic interest in, or is held in common with, the other and has not derived a significant portion of its gross revenues, receipts or net income for any period from transactions with the other. RP Financial represents and warrants that it is not aware of any fact or circumstance that would cause it not to be “independent” within the meaning of the conversion regulations of the federal banking agencies or otherwise prohibit or restrict in anyway RP Financial from serving in the role of independent appraiser for the Company.
* * * * * * * * * * *
     Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing as indicated below and returning to RP Financial a signed copy of this letter, together with the initial retainer fee of $10,000.
Sincerely,
/s/ Ronald S. Riggins
Ronald S. Riggins
President and Managing Director
Agreed To and Accepted By:   Joseph F. Jeamel, Jr. _______________________
Executive Vice President
Upon Authorization by the Board of Directors For:   Rockville Bank, subsidiary of Rockville Financial, Inc.
Vernon Rockville, Connecticut
Date Executed:   _________________________

 

Exhibit 99.2
(FINPRO LOGO)
July 22, 2010
William J. McGurk
President & CEO
Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
Rockville Bank
1645 Ellington Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Bill:
Based upon our recent discussions, FinPro, Inc. (“FinPro”) is pleased to submit this proposal to assist Rockville Bank and Rockville Financial MHC, Inc., hereafter collectively referred to as (“the Bank”), in compiling a Strategic Business Plan in conjunction with the Company’s possible second step transaction utilizing June 30, 2010 financials.
1. Scope of Project
The Plan will be specifically designed to build and measure value for a five-year time horizon. As part of the Plan compilation, the following major tasks will be included:
    assess the regulatory, social, political and economic environment;
 
    analyze the existing Bank markets from a demographic and competitive standpoint:
 
    document the internal situation assessment;
 
    analyze the current ALM position;
 
    analyze the CRA position;
 
    compile a historical trend analysis;
 
    perform detailed peer performance and comparable analysis;
 
    assess the Bank from a capital markets perspective including comparison to national, regional, and similar size organizations;
 
    identify and document strengths and weaknesses;
 
    document the objectives and goals;
 
    document strategies;
 
    map the Bank’s general ledger to FinPro’s planning model at a bank and consolidated level;
 
    compile five year projections of performance;
 
    perform multiple stress tests on the plan; and
 
    prepare assessment of strategic alternatives to enhance value.
As part of this process, FinPro will conduct modeling and planning sessions with the Company’s management in order to establish the situation assessment of the Company and analyze different plan scenarios. FinPro will also conduct a planning session with the Company’s Board to discuss the recommended plan scenario and its alternatives.
20 Church Street P.O. Box 323 Liberty Corner, NJ 07938-0323 Tel: 908.604.9336 Fax: 908.604.5951
finpro@finpronj.com www.finpronj.com

 


 

2. Requirements of the Bank
To accomplish the tasks set forth in this proposal, the following information and work effort is requested of the Bank:
    provide FinPro with all financial and other information, whether or not publicly available, necessary to familiarize FinPro with the business and operations of the Bank.
 
    allow FinPro the opportunity, from time to time, to discuss the operation of the Bank business with bank personnel.
 
    promptly advise FinPro of any material or contemplated material transactions which may have an effect on the day-to-day operations of the Bank.
 
    have system download capability.
 
    promptly review all work products of FinPro and provide necessary sign-offs on each work product so that FinPro can move on to the next phase.
 
    provide FinPro with office space, when FinPro is on-site, to perform its daily tasks. The office space requirements consist of a table with at least two chairs along with access to electrical outlets for FinPro’s computers and a high speed internet connection.
3. Term of the Agreement and Staffing
It is anticipated that it will take approximately six to eight weeks of elapsed time to complete the tasks outlined in this proposal. During this time, FinPro may be on-site at the Bank’s facilities on a regular basis, during normal business hours. Any future work that would require extra expense to the Bank will be proposed on separately from this engagement prior to any work being performed.

2


 

4. Fees and Expenses
Fees:
FinPro’s fees for this strategic planning engagement have been discounted from $70,000 due to FinPro’s relationship with the Bank.
FinPro fees to complete the tasks outlined in this proposal will be as follows:
         
Strategic Business Plan
  $ 50,000  
FinPro’s fee for this engagement is $50,000 (plus all out-of-pocket and pass-through expenses as outlined below). This fee shall be payable as follows:
    $15,000 retainer payable at signing of this agreement;
 
    $15,000 payable at the end of modeling sessions with management; and
 
    Remainder of the strategic business plan and all final expenses payable upon final business plan delivery.
Expenses:
In addition to any fees that may be payable to FinPro hereunder, the Bank hereby agrees to promptly (but not less than quarterly) reimburse FinPro for the following:
  1.   Out-of-Pocket — All of FinPro’s reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with FinPro’s engagement. It is FinPro policy to itemize expenses for each project so that the client can review, by line item, each expense.
 
  2.   Data Cost — There is a pass through cost for competitor financial/regulatory data which is equal to $1,000.
FinPro has included with this proposal an executed confidentiality agreement with the Bank. The Bank acknowledges that all opinions, valuations and advice (written or oral) given by FinPro to the Bank in connection with FinPro’s engagement are intended solely for the benefit and use of the Bank (and its directors, management, and attorneys) in connection with the matters contemplated hereby and the Bank agrees that no such opinion, valuation, or advice shall be used for any other purpose, except with respect to the opinion and valuation which may be used for the proper corporate purposes of the client, or reproduced, or disseminated, quoted or referred to at any time, in any manner or for any purpose, nor shall any public references to FinPro be made by the Bank (or such persons), without the prior written consent of FinPro, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
This proposal will expire 30 days from this date unless accepted by you in accordance with the terms below. Any changes to this proposal will require FinPro, Inc. approval.

3


 

Please sign and return one of the original copies of this agreement along with the retainer to indicate acceptance of the agreement. We hope that we might be selected to work with the Bank on this endeavor.
By,
     
 
   
Scott Martorana   William J. McGurk
Managing Director   President & CEO
FinPro, Inc.   Rockville Financial MHC, Inc.
     
     
Date   Date

4

Exhibit 99.3

PRO FORMA VALUATION REPORT
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
South Windsor, Connecticut
PROPOSED HOLDING COMPANY FOR:
ROCKVILLE BANK
South Windsor, Connecticut
Dated As Of:
August 26, 2010
 
Prepared By:
RP ® Financial, LC.
1100 North Glebe Road
Suite 1100
Arlington, Virginia 22201
 

 


 

RP ® FINANCIAL, LC.
 
Serving the Financial Services Industry Since 1988
August 26, 2010
Boards of Directors
Rockville Financial, MHC
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Rockville Bank
1645 Ellington Road
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Members of the Boards of Directors:
     At your request, we have completed and hereby provide an independent appraisal (“Appraisal”) of the estimated pro forma market value of the common stock which is to be issued in connection with the mutual-to-stock conversion transaction described below.
     This Appraisal is furnished pursuant to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations 563b.7 and has been prepared in accordance with the “Guidelines for Appraisal Reports for the Valuation of Savings and Loan Associations Converting from Mutual to Stock Form of Organization” of the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), and applicable regulatory interpretations thereof. Such Valuation Guidelines are relied upon by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Connecticut Department of Banking (the “Department”) and the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) in the absence of separate written valuation guidelines.
Description of Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
     On September 16, 2010, the respective Boards of Directors of Rockville Financial, MHC (the “MHC”), Rockville Financial, Inc. (“Rockville Financial” or the “Company”) and Rockville Bank, South Windsor, Connecticut (the “Bank”) adopted a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization (the “Plan of Conversion”) whereby the MHC will convert to stock form. As a result of the conversion, Rockville Financial, which currently owns a majority of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company will be succeed by a Connecticut corporation with the name of Rockville Financial-New, Inc. Following the conversion, the MHC will no longer exist. For purposes of this document, the existing consolidated entity will hereinafter be referred to as Rockville Financial or the Company. As of June 30, 2010, the MHC had a majority ownership interest in, and its principal asset consisted of, approximately 56.7% of the common stock (the “MHC Shares”) of Rockville Financial. The remaining 43.3% of Rockville Financial common stock is owned by public stockholders.
     It is our understanding that Rockville Financial will offer its stock, representing the majority ownership interest held by the MHC, in a subscription offering in descending order of priority to: (i) Eligible Account Holders; (ii) Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans; and (iii) Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. Any shares of stock not subscribed for by the foregoing classes of persons will be offered for sale to certain members of the public through a community offering, a syndicated community offering or a public offering, or through a combination of such offerings.
     
Washington Headquarters
   
Three Ballston Plaza
  Telephone: (703) 528-1700
1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 1100
  Fax No.: (703) 528-1788
Arlington, VA 22201
  Toll-Free No.: (866) 723-0594
www.rpfinancial.com
  E-Mail: mail@rpfinancial.com

 


 

Boards of Directors
August 26, 2010
Page 2
     In connection with and immediately following the conversion, the Company will contribute cash to the Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. (the “Foundation”), in an amount equal to 3% of the net proceeds of the conversion offering.
     Upon completing the mutual-to-stock conversion and stock offering (the “Second-Step Conversion” or “Offering”)), the Company will be 100% owned by public shareholders, the publicly-held shares of Rockville Financial will be exchanged for shares in the Company at a ratio that retains their ownership interest at the time the conversion is completed, taking into account the impact of the MHC assets in the Second Step Conversion, consistent with FDIC policy with respect to the treatment of MHC assets that will be consolidated with the Company.
    RP ® Financial, LC.
     RP ® Financial, LC. (“RP Financial”) is a financial consulting firm serving the financial services industry nationwide that, among other things, specializes in financial valuations and analyses of business enterprises and securities, including the pro forma valuation for savings institutions converting from mutual-to-stock form. The background and experience of RP Financial is detailed in Exhibit V-1. We believe that, except for the fee we will receive for our appraisal, we are independent of the Company, the Bank, the MHC and the other parties engaged by the Bank or the Company to assist in the stock conversion process.
Valuation Methodology
     In preparing our Appraisal, we have reviewed the regulatory applications of the Company, the Bank and the MHC, including the prospectus as filed with the OTS and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We have conducted a financial analysis of the Company, the Bank and the MHC that has included a review of audited financial information for the years ended December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2009 and unaudited financial information through June 30, 2010, and due diligence related discussions with the Company’s management; Wolf & Company, P.C., the Company’s independent auditor; Hinckley, Allen & Snyder, the Company’s conversion counsel; and Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc., the Company’s marketing advisor in connection with the stock offering. All assumptions and conclusions set forth in the Appraisal were reached independently from such discussions. In addition, where appropriate, we have considered information based on other available published sources that we believe are reliable. While we believe the information and data gathered from all these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information.
     We have investigated the competitive environment within which Rockville Financial operates and have assessed Rockville Financial’s relative strengths and weaknesses. We have kept abreast of the changing regulatory and legislative environment for financial institutions and analyzed the potential impact on Rockville Financial and the industry as a whole. We have analyzed the potential effects of the stock conversion on Rockville Financial’s operating characteristics and financial performance as they relate to the pro forma market value of Rockville Financial. We have analyzed the assets held by the MHC, which will be consolidated with Rockville Financial’s assets and equity pursuant to the completion of the Second-Step Conversion. We have reviewed the economic and demographic characteristics of the Company’s primary market area. We have compared Rockville Financial’s financial performance and condition with selected thrift holding companies in accordance with the Valuation Guidelines. We have reviewed the current conditions in the securities markets in

 


 

Boards of Directors
August 26, 2010
Page 3
general and the market for thrift stocks in particular, including the market for existing thrift issues, initial public offerings by thrifts and thrift holding companies, and second-step conversion offerings. We have excluded from such analyses thrifts subject to announced or rumored acquisition, and/or institutions that exhibit other unusual characteristics.
     The Appraisal is based on Rockville Financial’s representation that the information contained in the regulatory applications and additional information furnished to us by Rockville Financial and its independent auditor, legal counsel and other authorized agents are truthful, accurate and complete. We did not independently verify the financial statements and other information provided by Rockville Financial, or its independent auditor, legal counsel and other authorized agents nor did we independently value the assets or liabilities of Rockville Financial. The valuation considers Rockville Financial only as a going concern and should not be considered as an indication of Rockville Financial’s liquidation value.
     Our appraised value is predicated on a continuation of the current operating environment for Rockville Financial and for all thrifts and their holding companies. Changes in the local, state and national economy, the legislative and regulatory environment for financial institutions and mutual holding companies, the stock market, interest rates, and other external forces (such as natural disasters or significant world events) may occur from time to time, often with great unpredictability and may materially impact the value of thrift stocks as a whole or the value of Rockville Financial’s’ stock alone. It is our understanding that there are no current plans for selling control of Rockville Financial following completion of the Second-Step Conversion. To the extent that such factors can be foreseen, they have been factored into our analysis.
     The estimated pro forma market value is defined as the price at which Rockville Financial’s common stock, immediately upon completion of the second-step stock offering, would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.
    Valuation Conclusion
     It is our opinion that, as of August 26, 2010, the estimated aggregate pro forma valuation of the shares of the Company to be issued and outstanding at the end of the conversion offering — including (1) the shares to be issued publicly representing the MHC’s ownership interest in the Company adjusted for the dilutive impact of the MHC assets pursuant to FDIC policy, and (2) exchange shares issued to existing public shareholders of Rockville Financial — was $223,406,080 million at the midpoint, equal to 22,340,608 shares at $10.00 per share.
Establishment of the Exchange Ratio
     OTS regulations provide that in a conversion of a mutual holding company, the minority stockholders are entitled to exchange the public shares for newly issued shares in the fully converted company. The Boards of Directors of the MHC, Rockville Financial and the Bank have independently determined the exchange ratio, which has been designed to preserve the current aggregate percentage ownership in the Company held by the public shareholders after adjustment for the dilutive impact of consolidation of the net assets of the MHC utilizing a methodology consistent with FDIC policy in this regard. The exact exchange ratio to be received by the existing minority shareholders of the Company will be determined at the end of the Offering, based on the total number of shares sold in the subscription and syndicated

 


 

Boards of Directors
August 26, 2010
Page 4
offerings and the final appraisal. Based on the valuation conclusion herein, the resulting offering value and the $10.00 per share offering price, the indicated exchange ratio at the midpoint is 1.1441 shares of the Company for every one public share held by public shareholders. Furthermore, based on the offering range of value, the indicated exchange ratio is 0.9725 at the minimum, 1.3158 at the maximum and 1.5131 at the supermaximum. RP Financial expresses no opinion on the proposed exchange of newly issued Company shares for the shares held by the public stockholders or on the proposed exchange ratio. The resulting range of value pursuant to regulatory guidelines, the corresponding number of shares based on the Board approved $10.00 per share offering price, and the resulting exchange ratios are shown below.
                                 
                    Exchange Shares    
            Offering   Issued to the   Exchange
    Total Shares   Shares   Public Shareholders   Ratio
Shares
                            (x )
Super Maximum
    29,545,455       17,192,500       12,352,955       1.5131  
Maximum
    25,691,700       14,950,000       10,741,700       1.3158  
Midpoint
    22,340,608       13,000,000       9,340,608       1.1441  
Minimum
    18,989,517       11,050,000       7,939,517       0.9725  
 
                               
Distribution of Shares
                               
Super Maximum
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
Maximum
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
Midpoint
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
Minimum
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
 
                               
Aggregate Market Value(1)
                               
Super Maximum
  $ 295,454,550     $ 171,925,000     $ 123,529,550          
Maximum
  $ 256,917,000     $ 149,500,000     $ 107,417,000          
Midpoint
  $ 223,406,080     $ 130,000,000     $ 93,406,080          
Minimum
  $ 189,895,170     $ 110,500,000     $ 79,395,170          
 
(1)   Based on offering price of $10.00 per share.
 
Note:   Valuation and ownership ratios reflect dilutive impact of MHC assets upon completion of the Second Step Conversion.
Limiting Factors and Considerations
     Our valuation is not intended, and must not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing shares of the common stock. Moreover, because such valuation is necessarily based upon estimates and projections of a number of matters, all of which are subject to change from time to time, no assurance can be given that persons who purchase shares of common stock in the conversion will thereafter be able to buy or sell such shares at prices related to the foregoing valuation of the estimated pro forma market value

 


 

Boards of Directors
August 26, 2010
Page 5
thereof. The appraisal reflects only a valuation range as of this date for the pro forma market value of Rockville Financial immediately upon issuance of the stock and does not take into account any trading activity with respect to the purchase and sale of common stock in the secondary market following the completion of the second-step offering.
     RP Financial’s valuation was based on the financial condition, operations and shares outstanding of Rockville Financial as of June 30, 2010, the date of the financial data included in the prospectus. The proposed exchange ratio to be received by the current public stockholders of Rockville Financial and the exchange of the public shares for newly issued shares of Rockville Financial common stock as a full public company was determined independently by the Boards of Directors of the MHC, Rockville Financial, and the Bank. RP Financial expresses no opinion on the proposed exchange ratio to public stockholders or the exchange of public shares for newly issued shares.
     RP Financial is not a seller of securities within the meaning of any federal and state securities laws and any report prepared by RP Financial shall not be used as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any securities. RP Financial maintains a policy which prohibits RP Financial, its principals or employees from purchasing stock of its client institutions.
     This valuation will be updated as provided for in the conversion regulations and guidelines. These updates will consider, among other things, any developments or changes in the financial performance and condition of Rockville Financial, management policies, and current conditions in the equity markets for thrift shares, both existing issues and new issues. These updates may also consider changes in other external factors which impact value including, but not limited to: various changes in the legislative and regulatory environment for financial institutions, the stock market and the market for thrift stocks, and interest rates. Should any such new developments or changes be material, in our opinion, to the valuation of the shares, appropriate adjustments to the estimated pro forma market value will be made. The reasons for any such adjustments will be explained in the update at the date of the release of the update. The valuation will also be updated at the completion of Rockville Financial’s stock Offering.
Respectfully submitted,
RP ® FINANCIAL, LC.
(SIGNATURE)
Ronald S. Riggins
President and Managing Director
(SIGNATURE)
James P. Hennessey
Director

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.
  TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
  i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
ROCKVILLE BANK
South Windsor, Connecticut
         
    PAGE
DESCRIPTION   NUMBER
CHAPTER ONEOVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
       
 
       
Introduction
    I.1  
Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
    I.2  
Purpose of the Reorganization
    I.3  
Rockville Financial Mutual Holding Company
    I.4  
Strategic Overview
    I.5  
Balance Sheet Trends
    I.8  
Income and Expense Trends
    I.13  
Interest Rate Risk Management
    I.18  
Lending Activities and Strategy
    I.19  
Origination, Purchasing, and Servicing of Loans
    I.22  
Asset Quality
    I.22  
Funding Composition and Strategy
    I.23  
Subsidiaries
    I.24  
Legal Proceedings
    I.24  
 
       
CHAPTER TWO MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
       
 
       
Introduction
  II.1
Market Area Demographics
  II.4
Summary of Local Economy
  II.6
Unemployment Trends
  II.8
Market Area Deposit Characteristics
  II.8
 
       
CHAPTER THREEPEER GROUP ANALYSIS
       
 
       
Peer Group Selection
  III.1
Financial Condition
  III.6
Income and Expense Components
  III.9
Loan Composition
  III.12
Interest Rate Risk
  III.14
Credit Risk
  III.15
Summary
  III.15

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.
  TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
  ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.
ROCKVILLE BANK
South Windsor, Connecticut
(continued)
         
    PAGE
DESCRIPTION   NUMBER
CHAPTER FOUR VALUATION ANALYSIS
       
Introduction
  IV.1
Appraisal Guidelines
  IV.1
RP Financial Approach to the Valuation
  IV.1
Valuation Analysis
  IV.2
1. Financial Condition
  IV.2
2. Profitability, Growth and Viability of Earnings
  IV.4
3. Asset Growth
  IV.5
4. Primary Market Area
  IV.5
5. Dividends
  IV.6
6. Liquidity of the Shares
  IV.7
7. Marketing of the Issue
  IV.7
A. The Public Market
  IV.8
B. The New Issue Market
  IV.14
C. The Acquisition Market
  IV.16
D Trading in Rockville Financial’s Stock
  IV.16
8. Management
  IV.18
9. Effect of Government Regulation and Regulatory Reform
  IV.19
Summary of Adjustments
  IV.19
Valuation Approaches
  IV.19
1. Price-to-Earnings (“P/E”) IV.21
       
2. Price-to-Book (“P/B”) IV.23
       
3. Price-to-Assets (“P/A”)
  IV.25
Comparison to Recent Offerings
  IV.25
Valuation Conclusion
  IV.26
Establishment of the Exchange Ratio
  IV.26

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.
  TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
  iii
LIST OF TABLES
ROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC
ROCKVILLE BANK
South Windsor, Connecticut
                 
TABLE        
Number   DESCRIPTION   PAGE
  1.1    
Historical Balance Sheet Data
    I.9  
  1.2    
Historical Income Statements
    I.14  
 
       
  2.1    
Deposit Market Share
  II.2
  2.2    
Summary Demographic Data
  II.5
  2.3    
Primary Market Area Employment Sectors
  II.7
  2.4    
Market Area Unemployment Trends
  II.8
  2.5    
Deposit Summary
  II.9
 
       
  3.1    
Peer Group of Publicly-Traded Thrifts
  III.3
  3.2    
Balance Sheet Composition and Growth Rates
  III.7
  3.3    
Income as a % of Average Assets and Yields, Costs, Spreads
  III.10
  3.4    
Loan Portfolio Composition and Related Information
  III.13
  3.5    
Interest Rate Risk Measures and Net Interest Income Volatility
  III.14
  3.6    
Credit Risk Measures and Related Information
  III.16
 
       
  4.1    
Pricing Characteristics: Recent Conversions Completed
  IV.15
  4.2    
Market Pricing Comparatives
  IV.17
  4.3    
Public Market Pricing
  IV.24

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.1  
I. OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Introduction
     Rockville Bank (“Rockville Bank” or the “Bank”) is a Connecticut-chartered savings bank headquartered in Rockville, Connecticut. The Bank conducts business from its main office and 21 branches, located in Hartford, New London, and Tolland Counties in Connecticut. In addition, the Bank delivers its banking products and services and related information services through alternative delivery mechanisms including the Internet, a telephone call center and 42 ATMs, including 13 stand-alone ATM facilities as well as a limited service branch located in a South Windsor High School. The Bank was originally chartered in 1858 as a state-chartered savings bank. Rockville is located in north-central Connecticut approximately 15 miles from Hartford. The Bank’s branch banking locations are primarily located in the north-central portion of Connecticut while lending operations encompass a greater area across much of Connecticut and southern Massachusetts.
     Effective November 1, 1997, the Bank converted to a stock savings bank in connection with a mutual holding company reorganization whereby Charter Oak Community Bank Corp. (“Charter Oak”), a mutual company, became the Bank’s mutual holding company (“the MHC”) and the Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the MHC.
     Rockville Financial, Inc. of Connecticut (“Rockville Financial” or the “Company”), a stat-chartered mid-tier stock holding company was formed on December 17, 2004, to reorganize Charter Oak Community Bank Corp. from a state-chartered MHC to a state-chartered two-tier mutual and stock holding company. The reorganization and minority stock issuance was completed on May 20, 2005. Charter Oak’s name was changed to Rockville Financial MHC, Inc. and 100% of the stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary Rockville Bank was exchanged for 10,689,250 shares, or 55% of the stock issued by the Company. The Company sold 8,357,050 shares of common stock, representing 43% of the outstanding common shares at a purchase price of $10.00 per share in a subscription offering that closed at the maximum of the range.
     In connection with the stock offering, the Company established Rockville Bank Foundation, Inc. (the “Foundation”), a non-profit charitable organization dedicated to helping the communities that the Bank serves. The Foundation was funded with a contribution of 388,700 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 2% of the outstanding common shares.

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.2  
The offering resulted in approximately $81.0 million in net proceeds to the Company. The most significant asset of the Company is the stock of the Bank. At June 30, 2010, due to purchases of treasury stock, the MHC owns 56.7% of the outstanding common stock of Rockville Financial and the minority public shareholders own the remaining 43.3%.
     The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system and its deposits are insured up to the regulatory maximums by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Rockville Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Connecticut Department of Banking (the “Department”) and by the FDIC. The MHC and the Company (currently and prospectively) are subject to regulation and supervision of the Department and the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”).
     The Company’s primary business consists of providing a full range of banking services to consumer and commercial customers, thereby attracting deposits from the general public and using those funds, together with FHLB advances, to originate loans to their customers and invest in securities such as U.S. Government and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and municipal obligations. At June 30, 2010, the Company had $1.6 billion of total assets, $1.2 billion of total deposits, $1.4 billion in loans, and stockholders’ equity equal to $162.4 million, or 10.1% of total assets. Excluding $1.1 million of intangible assets, the Company’s tangible stockholders’ equity is $161.2 million, or 10.1% of assets. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company reported net income equal to $11.5 million, for a return on average assets equal to 0.74%. The Company’s audited financial statements are included by reference as Exhibit I-1 and key operating ratios are shown in Exhibit I-2.
Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
     On September 16, 2010, Rockville Financial announced that the Boards of Directors of the MHC, Rockville Financial and the Bank unanimously adopted a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization (the “Plan of Conversion”), pursuant to which Rockville Financial will convert from the three-tier MHC structure to the full stock holding company structure and concurrently conduct a second-step conversion offering (“Second Step Conversion” or “Offering”) that will include the sale of the MHC’s ownership interest in Rockville Financial. Pursuant to the Plan of Conversion, Rockville Financial will be succeeded by a new Connecticut chartered stock corporation of the same name. As a result of the conversion, Rockville Financial, which currently owns a majority of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company, will be succeeded by a Connecticut corporation with the name of Rockville Financial-New, Inc.

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.3  
Following the conversion, the MHC will no longer exist. For purposes of this document, the existing consolidated entity and the newly incorporated entity will hereinafter be referred to as Rockville Financial or the Company unless otherwise noted.
     Pursuant to the Second Step Conversion transaction, Rockville Financial will sell shares of its common stock in a subscription offering in descending order of priority to the Bank’s members and other stakeholders as follows: Eligible Account Holders; Tax-Qualified Employee Stock Benefit Plans; and. Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. Any shares of stock not subscribed for by the foregoing classes of persons will be offered for sale to certain members of the public through a community offering, a syndicated community offering or a public offering, or through a combination of such offerings. The Company will also issue exchange shares of its common stock to the current public shareholders in the Second Step Conversion transaction pursuant to an exchange ratio that will result in the same aggregate ownership percentage as immediately before the Offering, taking into account the impact of MHC assets in the Second Step Conversion, consistent with FDIC policy with respect to the treatment of MHC assets. The dilution of the current minority ownership position to account for the MHC assets will be discussed in greater detail in the valuation analysis to follow (Section IV).
     In connection with and immediately following the conversion, the Company will contribute cash to the Foundation, in an amount equal to 3% of the net proceeds of the conversion offering.
Purpose of the Reorganization
     The Second Step Conversion will increase the capital level to support further expansion, improve the overall competitive position of the Company in the local market area, enhance profitability and reduce interest rate risk. Importantly, the additional equity will provide a larger capital base for continued growth and diversification, as well as increase the lending capability of the Company, including the funds available for lending and the ability to service larger commercial relationships. Future growth opportunities are expected through the current branch network as well as through de novo branching in the regional markets served. Additionally, the Company anticipates that growth opportunities will result from regional bank consolidation in the local market, particularly in the current economic and operating environment, and the resulting fallout of customers who are attracted to the Company’s customer service and various products. The Second Step Conversion should facilitate the Company’s ability to pursue such acquisitions through increased capital as well as the ability to use common stock as merger consideration.

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.4  
Further, the Second Step Conversion will increase the public ownership, which is expected to improve the liquidity of the common stock.
     The projected use of stock proceeds is highlighted below.
    The Company. The Company is expected to retain up to 50% of the net conversion proceeds. At present, Company funds, net of the loan to the ESOP, are expected to be invested initially into high quality investment securities with short- to intermediate-term maturities, generally consistent with the current investment mix. Over time, Company funds are anticipated to be utilized for various corporate purposes, possibly including acquisitions, infusing additional equity into the Bank, repurchases of common stock, and the payment of regular and/or special cash dividends.
 
    The Bank. The balance of the net conversion proceeds will be infused into the Bank. Cash proceeds (i.e., net proceeds less deposits withdrawn to fund stock purchases) infused into the Bank are anticipated to become part of general operating funds, and are expected to initially be invested in short-term investments pending longer-term deployment, i.e., funding lending activities, general corporate purposes and/or expansion and diversification. To the extent that the net proceeds generate excess investable funds, the Company may also utilize its portion of the net proceeds to pay down borrowed funds.
     The Company expects to continue to pursue a controlled growth strategy, leveraging its strong pro forma capital, and growing primarily through the current delivery channels. If appropriate, Rockville may also consider various capital management strategies to assist in the long run objective of increasing return on equity (“ROE”).
Rockville Financial Mutual Holding Company
     Pursuant to the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization, the assets and liabilities of the MHC will be merged with the Company. As of June 30, 2010, the MHC had unconsolidated net assets of $7.7 million, which reflects the initial capital at the time of the MHC reorganization and the accumulated dividends on the MHC shares, as well as the earnings on such funds. While the consolidation of the net assets of the MHC will increase the pro forma value of the Company, it will also result in pro forma ownership dilution for the minority shareholders’ ownership interests pursuant to the application of the applicable FDIC policy. The dilution of the current minority ownership position to account for the MHC assets will be discussed in greater detail in the valuation analysis to follow (Section IV).

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.5  
Strategic Overview
     Throughout much of its corporate history, the Company’s strategic focus has been that of a community oriented financial institution with a primary focus on meeting the borrowing, savings and other financial needs of its local customers in Hartford, New London, and Tolland Counties, where the Company maintains branch offices, as well as other nearby areas in Connecticut and southern Massachusetts.. In this regard, the Company has historically pursued a portfolio residential lending strategy typical of a thrift institution, with a moderate level of diversification into commercial real estate lending. Over the last decade, with an intensified focus in the last five years, the Company has sought to expand commercial lending, including both commercial mortgage and commercial and industrial (“C&I”) non-mortgage loans. In this regard, the Company has emphasized high quality and flexible service, capitalizing on its local orientation and broad array of products and services. Accordingly, the Company’s lending operations consists of two principal segments, as follows: (1) residential mortgage lending; and (2) commercial mortgage lending in conjunction with the intensified efforts to become a full-service community bank.
     In recognition of the risks involved in commercial lending, the Company has bolstered the loan department staffing, both in terms of loan officers and the credit administration area in order to manage the expanded commercial mortgage portfolio. Additionally, management has developed extensive policies and procedures pertaining to credit standards and the administration of commercial accounts, as well as a comprehensive loan review process to continually track the credit quality and risk of the loan portfolio. As a result of the expanded emphasis on commercial mortgage lending, the portfolio balance of commercial mortgage loans, as well as construction and land loans has increased. Specifically, the aggregate balance of commercial mortgage and construction loans has increased from $196.1 million, equal to 22.6% of total loans as of the end of fiscal 2005, to $513.3 million, or 36.8% of total loans at June 30, 2010. Moreover, in recent years, the commercial real estate loan portfolio has accounted for the majority of the growth in the loan portfolio.
     Despite the recent commercial lending emphasis, residential mortgage loans continue to comprise a significant segment of the loan portfolio, and equaled $747.4 million, or 53.6% of total loans as of June 30, 2010, including first and second mortgages, as well as home equity loans and home equity lines of credit (“HELOC”). The Company’s residential mortgage loans are originated internally by the Bank loan officers, as well as brokers and correspondent lenders

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.6  
on a limited basis as long as they meet the Company’s underwriting criteria. Fixed rate mortgage loans generally are originated for terms of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years. Typically all fixed rate residential mortgage loans are underwritten according to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) guidelines. Due to interest rate risk considerations, the Company has established an internal policy limit which precludes the origination for portfolio of long term fixed rate loans with interest rates below 5.25%, retaining such loans only on an exception basis, and generally retaining the loan servicing rights. As a result of the low interest rate environment which has resulted in market interest rate levels for residential mortgage loans below the 5.25% internal policy limit, the majority of the Company’s residential mortgage originations have been sold into the secondary market. Accordingly, the portfolio balance of 1-4 family residential mortgage loans has declined over the six months ended June 30, 2010, moderating overall growth of the loan portfolio balances.
     The Company’s cash, liquidity and securities portfolios consist of interest-earning deposits and short- to intermediate-term investment securities and MBS, the majority of which are currently classified as available for sale (“AFS”). The Company’s general balance sheet objective is to deploy funds primarily into loans and maintain moderate balances of cash and investments, given the higher yields typically available on loans.
     Retail deposits have consistently served as the primary interest-bearing funding source for the Company. The Company has sought to increase the deposit base through management’s efforts to enhance the convenience of the branch office network (by increasing the number of branch offices from 13 to 22 since the end of fiscal 2005). In recent years, growth of checking and other transaction accounts have constituted the largest source of deposit growth. As a result, transaction and savings accounts currently comprise a larger portion of the Company’s deposit composition than certificates of deposit (“CDs”). Management believes that the growth in savings and transaction accounts and reduced reliance on CDs to fund operations is attributable to several factors including: (1) depositors preference for shorter term accounts in the low rate environment, which has fueled the growth of money market accounts as well as disintermediation from the stock and bond markets; (2) intensified marketing efforts by the Company to develop broad-based consumer and commercial relationships which have resulted in growth of core deposits; (3) expanded delivery systems including significant growth of the branch office network and employment of alternative delivery technologies; and (4) ongoing consolidation of the banking industry in the market, which has enhanced the ability to market the Company as a locally-owned and operated community bank.

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.7  
     The Company utilizes borrowings as a supplemental funding source to facilitate management of funding costs and interest rate risk. FHLB advances and a FHLB line of credit constitute the Company’s principal source of borrowings. The majority of the Company’s FHLB advances have fixed rates. Given the recent environment, the Company has been taking down modest term fixed rate advances for cost of funds management.
     The post-offering business plan of the Company is expected to continue to focus on products and services which have been the Company’s emphasis in recent years. The increased capital from the offering is expected to facilitate additional balance sheet growth, leveraging of operating expenses and infrastructure investments. The new capital will increase the Company’s competitive posture and financial strength. In terms of specific strategies, the Company plans to undertake the following as key elements of its business plan on a post-Conversion basis, which largely represent a continuation of the strategies currently in place:
    Expand Market Coverage. Expanding the Company’s retail banking presence in the current markets in Connecticut by establishing new branches to enhance coverage in existing markets or expanding into nearby contiguous markets. The effort to expand the market presence will be accomplished largely through the establishment of new branches, but may also be accomplished through acquisition of branches or whole institutions. Management believes that notwithstanding the recessionary economy, it has the ability to grow as some competitors have retrenched owing to deteriorating asset quality and as a result of recent merger and acquisition activity in the market (i.e., acquisition of local community banks by out-of-market competitors), which will provide it with a competitive advantage to expand.
 
    Control Operating Expenses. The Company is seeking to maximize efficiency and will seek to undertake asset growth to leverage the existing overhead infrastructure. Additionally, Rockville Financial is continually evaluating its branches for profitability and is seeking to grow all of its branches to a profitable size. The Company has sought to develop a sales culture within its front-line branch staff such that the ability to grow is enhanced, both in terms of the dollar amount of the customer relationship and the number of products and services per relationship. Additionally, the Company will continue to utilize technology (both developed and emerging), to the extent it can enhance the Company’s efficiency and ability to meet the customers’ needs and preference, as noted below.
 
    Effective Utilization of Technology. The Company recognizes the impact of the digital revolution as it impacts consumer preferences and is prepared to respond with a strategic objective of allowing customers to choose how they maintain their relationship with Rockville Financial. In this regard, the Company plans to continue to enhance its e-banking platform by enhancing their online banking capabilities including optimizing all web pages for (i) searches and (ii) Smartphone/PDA compatibility. At present, the Company does not use social networking to promote its services or service clients, but it will be seeking to

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.8  
      develop this capability over the long term, particularly as it seeks to expand its share of the youth market.
 
    Build Community Bank Franchise. The Company will seek to continue to offer products and services consistent with its efforts to more fully develop a strong community bank franchise. In this regard, Rockville Financial will continue its emphasis on residential mortgage lending activities which comprise a majority of the loan portfolio and will also seek to take advantage of the recent acquisition of Family Choice Mortgage Company, which was acquired to expand the Company’s mortgage origination business. Similarly, the Company will continue to expand commercial real estate and commercial business lending activities, thereby continuing to emphasize the marketing and development of commercial account relationships. As noted earlier, the Company’s approach will be to develop comprehensive customer relationships to the extent possible, including both loan and deposit relationships. An additional benefit of the additional capital raised in the Second Step Conversion will be that Rockville Financial will be able to accommodate larger account relationships (this benefit is not a primary driver for the effort to complete the Offering).
 
    Control the Company’s Exposure to Risk Factors. Rockville Financial seeks to control its exposure to various risk factors, including interest rate risk, liquidity risk, credit risk, reputational risk, and compliance risk among other risk factors. In this regard, the Company has expanded its management and staff infrastructure with the objective of managing the foregoing risks. Additionally, the Company has bolstered management information systems and management structure, including the applicable management and board committee structures, such that the various risk factors can be monitored and measured, and risk exposure minimized accordingly.
Balance Sheet Trends
      Growth Trends
          The Company’s recent operating strategy is evidenced in Table 1.1. Since December 31, 2005, total assets increased at a 9.70% compounded annual rate, expanding from $1.1 billion to $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2010. However, the majority of the asset growth was achieved over the 2005 to 2008 period as assets have increased by only 4.5% since fiscal 2008. Loans have realized a faster growth rate than total assets, however, and thus increased in proportion to total assets, from 81.4% at December 31, 2005, to 86.3% at June 30, 2010. Specifically, loans have increased at an 11.1% annual rate from the end of fiscal 2005 through June 30, 2010, while investment securities increased at a minimal 0.3% annual rate, decreasing from 12.2% of total assets at the end of fiscal 2005 to 8.2% of assets as of June 30, 2010.
          The Company’s assets are funded through a combination of deposits, borrowings and retained earnings. Deposits have historically comprised the majority of funding liabilities,

 


 

     

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.9  
and increased at an annual rate of 9.6% since the end of fiscal 2005. Deposit growth in recent years has been primarily driven by money market and checking account deposits, while CDs have diminished both in dollar terms and as a percent of deposits. Borrowings serve as an alternative funding source for the Company to address funding needs for growth and to support management of deposit costs and interest rate risk. From year end 2005 through June 30, 2010, borrowings increased at an annual rate of 17.7%. The Company’s utilization of borrowings reached a peak balance of $322.9 million or 21.1% of assets at year end 2008, and subsequently trended lower to equal $272.5 million or 17.0% of assets at June 30, 2010, with the diminished level of borrowings reflecting the impact of strong deposit growth, coupled with the more limited need for funds as a result of slower growth of the loan portfolio.
Table 1.1
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Historical Balance Sheet Data
                                                                                                         
    At Fiscal Year Ended December 31,   As of   Annual
    2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   June 30, 2010   Growth Rate
    Amount   Pct(1)   Amount   Pct(1)   Amount   Pct(1)   Amount   Pct(1)   Amount   Pct(1)   Amount   Pct(1)   Pct
    ($000)   (%)   ($000)   (%)   ($000)   (%)   ($000)   (%)   ($000)   (%)   ($000)   (%)   (%)
Total Amount of:
                                                                                                       
Total Assets
  $ 1,056,169       100.00 %   $ 1,232,836       100.00 %   $ 1,327,012       100.00 %   $ 1,533,073       100.00 %   $ 1,571,134       100.00 %   $ 1,602,014       100.00 %     9.70 %
Available for Sale Securities
    129,049       12.22 %     132,467       10.74 %     136,372       10.28 %     141,250       9.21 %     102,751       6.54 %     114,047       7.12 %     -2.71 %
Held to Maturity Securities
    0       0.00 %     0       0.00 %     0       0.00 %     24,138       1.57 %     19,074       1.21 %     16,747       1.05 %   NM
FHLB Stock
    8,498       0.80 %     9,836       0.80 %     11,168       0.84 %     17,007       1.11 %     17,007       1.08 %     17,007       1.06 %     16.67 %
Loans Receivable, net
    859,700       81.40 %     1,033,355       83.82 %     1,116,327       84.12 %     1,291,791       84.26 %     1,361,019       86.63 %     1,383,036       86.33 %     11.14 %
Cash and Cash Equivalents
    23,611       2.24 %     22,381       1.82 %     23,998       1.81 %     14,901       0.97 %     19,307       1.23 %     19,536       1.22 %     -4.12 %
Goodwill
    1,070       0.10 %     1,070       0.09 %     1,070       0.08 %     1,070       0.07 %     1,070       0.07 %     1,149       0.07 %     1.60 %
Deposits
    761,396       72.09 %     884,511       71.75 %     951,038       71.67 %     1,042,508       68.00 %     1,129,108       71.87 %     1,150,379       71.81 %     9.60 %
Mortgagors’ and Investors’ Escrow Accounts
    4,794       0.45 %     5,320       0.43 %     5,568       0.42 %     6,077       0.40 %     6,385       0.41 %     5,175       0.32 %     1.71 %
FHLB Advances
    130,867       12.39 %     178,110       14.45 %     201,741       15.20 %     322,882       21.06 %     263,802       16.79 %     272,501       17.01 %     17.70 %
Total Stockholders’ Equity
    150,905       14.29 %     155,064       12.58 %     156,373       11.78 %     145,777       9.51 %     157,428       10.02 %     162,384       10.14 %     1.64 %
Total Tangible Stockholders’ Equity
    149,835       14.19 %     153,994       12.49 %     155,303       11.70 %     144,707       9.44 %     156,358       9.95 %     161,235       10.06 %     1.64 %
Allowance for Loan Losses
    8,675       0.82 %     9,827       0.80 %     10,620       0.80 %     12,553       0.82 %     12,539       0.80 %     13,144       0.82 %     9.67 %
Non-Performing Loans
    7,177       0.68 %     1,493       0.12 %     1,569       0.12 %     10,435       0.68 %     12,046       0.77 %     14,366       0.90 %     16.67 %
 
                                                                                                       
Loans/Deposits
            112.91 %             116.83 %             117.38 %             123.91 %             120.54 %             120.22 %        
 
                                                                                                       
Number of Full Service Offices
    13               14               16               17               18               22                  
 
(1)   Ratios are as a percent of ending assets.
Sources: Rockville Financial’s prospectus and audited and unaudited financial reports.

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.10  
          Annual equity growth equaled 1.6% since the end of fiscal 2005. The majority of the equity growth was attributable to the completion of the minority stock issuance in fiscal 2005, which increased equity by the $81.0 million of net proceeds raised. Subsequently, growth of the equity base has been limited as capital management strategies (i.e., dividends and share repurchases by the Company) substantially offset the capital growth provided by earnings. Accordingly, the Company’s capital ratio has diminished from 14.3% at the end of fiscal 2005, to 10.1% as of June 30, 2010. Going forward, the post-Offering equity growth rate is expected to be impacted by a number of factors including the higher level of capitalization, the reinvestment and leveraging of the Offering proceeds, the expense of the stock benefit plans and the potential impact of dividends and stock repurchases.
      Loans Receivable
          Loans receivable totaled $1.4 billion, or 86.3% of total assets, as of June 30, 2010, and reflects 11.1% annual growth since the end of fiscal 2005. Over this period, the proportion of loans to total assets has increased as the rate of loan growth exceeded the asset growth rate, while the composition of the loan portfolio has shifted modestly to include a higher proportion of commercial loans (inclusive of construction and development loans). The majority of the residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed rate loans. The majority of the Company’s 1-4 family residential mortgage loans conform to standards set by Freddie Mac and it has been the Company’s recent practice to sell longer term fixed rate loans into the secondary market on a servicing retained basis.
          The Company has historically concentrated its lending activities on the origination of loans secured primarily by first mortgage liens on existing single-family residences and intends to continue to originate permanent loans secured by first mortgage liens on single-family residential properties in the future, however selling lower rate residential mortgages into the secondary market. The balance of the 1-4 family mortgage loan portfolio has fluctuated slightly over the period reflecting strong market demand for fixed rate loans in the low interest rate environment. As a result, permanent 1-4 family residential mortgage loans (including home equity loans and HELOCs) have decreased modestly in proportion to total loans (from 64.3% of total loans in fiscal 2005, to 53.6% of total loans as of June 30, 2010). Additionally, commercial mortgage loans have increased in recent years to equal 32.2% of total loans as of June 30, 2010, reflecting the current strategic emphasis. Such loans are generally secured by small office buildings, industrial facilities, and retail facilities. The Company’s mortgage lending

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.11  
emphasis is evidenced by the fact that 90.3% of the loan portfolio is secured by mortgage loans (including construction loans); in contrast, consumer and other non-mortgage loans only comprised 9.7% of the loan portfolio.
      Cash, Investments and Mortgage-Backed Securities
          The intent of the Company’s investment policy is to provide adequate liquidity, to generate a favorable return on excess investable funds and to support the established credit and interest rate risk objectives. The ratio of cash and investments (including MBS and FHLB stock) has declined, from 15.3% of assets at the end of fiscal 2005 to 10.5% as of June 30, 2010. The decline in the cash and investment portfolio in proportion to total assets is primarily attributable to the Company’s efforts to maximize the investment in higher yielding loans and to repay borrowed funds.
          Investment securities including MBS, U.S. Government–sponsored enterprise investments, corporate and municipal bonds, and marketable equity securities equaled $130.8 million, or 8.2% of total assets as of June 30, 2010, while cash and equivalents totaled $19.5 million, or 1.2% of assets (see Exhibit I-3 for the investment portfolio composition). Additionally, the Company has an investment in FHLB stock of $17.0 million, or 1.1% of assets. The Company’s investment securities are classified as AFS and held-to-maturity (“HTM”) with balances totaling $114.0 million and $16.7 million, respectively.
          No major changes to the composition and practices with respect to the management of the investment portfolio are anticipated over the near term, except that the level of cash and investments is anticipated to increase initially following the Second Step Conversion. Over the longer term, it is the Company’s intent to leverage the proceeds with loans to a greater extent than investment securities. However, management has indicated that leveraging of the expanded capital base by utilizing investment securities, including MBS, will continue to be evaluated based on market, profitability, interest rate risk and other similar considerations.
      Bank-Owned Life Insurance
          As of June 30, 2010, bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) totaled $10.3 million , which reflects slight growth since the end of fiscal 2005 owing to increases in the cash surrender value of the policies. The balance of the BOLI reflects the value of life insurance contracts on selected members of the Company’s management and has been purchased with the intent to offset various benefit program expenses on a tax-advantaged basis. The increase in the cash

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.12  
surrender value of the BOLI is recognized as an addition to other non-interest income on an annual basis.
      Intangible Assets
          The Company maintained a balance of intangible assets of $1.1 million at June 30, 2010, versus a balance of $1.1 million at year end 2005. Goodwill and intangibles maintained at year end 2005 was the result of a prior branch acquisition and the intangible asset balance increased modestly over the first six months of fiscal 2010 owing to the acquisition of Family Choice Mortgage Company during the period.
      Funding Structure
          Since fiscal year end 2005, deposits have grown at a 9.6% compounded annual rate, and the composition has changed modestly as all the core accounts have increased and time deposits have declined. Specifically, money market (and investment savings) accounts and interest checking have been increasing in proportion to total deposits while growth of non-interest checking and savings accounts has been limited. The Company has been promoting competitive rate shorter-term time deposits and money market accounts in response to the competition within the market area to maintain existing market share and to fund loan growth and reduce borrowings. The proportion of CDs and checking accounts (interest and non-interest bearing accounts) to total deposits equaled 41.8% and 23.4%, respectively, as of June 30, 2010 and comprise the two largest individual segments of the deposit base.
          As of June 30, 2010, borrowed funds totaled $272.5 million, representing 17.0% of total assets. The Company’s increasing balance of borrowed funds consists of FHLB advances and a FHLB line of credit. The majority of the Company’s FHLB advances have fixed rates. Given the recent environment, the Company has been utilizing term fixed rate advances for cost of funds and interest rate risk management purposes.
          The Company’s current posture on funding with borrowings is to use such funds: (1) when they are priced attractively relative to deposits; (2) to lengthen the duration of liabilities; (3) to enhance earnings when attractive revenue enhancement opportunities arise; and (4) to generate additional liquid funds, if required.
      Equity

 


 

RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.13  
          With the completion of the minority stock issuance under the MHC structure in May 2005, Rockville Financial’s equity was substantially bolstered and equaled $150.9 million, or 14.3% of assets as of December 31, 2005. Since fiscal year end 2005, the Company’s equity has increased modestly as the capital management strategies implemented by the Company (dividends and share repurchases) partially offset the retention of earnings through profitable operations. As of June 30, 2010, Rockville Financial’s stockholders’ equity totaled $162.4 million, equal to 10.1% of assets. The Company maintained surpluses relative to its regulatory capital requirements at June 30, 2010, and was qualified as a “well capitalized” institution. The Offering proceeds will serve to further strengthen the Company’s regulatory capital position and support the ability to undertake high risk-weight lending in the current environment, albeit at diminished growth rates relative to the prior five fiscal year period. As discussed previously, the post-Offering equity growth rate is expected to be impacted by a number of factors including the higher level of capitalization, the reinvestment of the Offering proceeds, the expense of the stock benefit plans and the potential impact of dividends and stock repurchases. Additionally, the ability to increase capital will be dependent upon the ability of Rockville Financial to execute a business plan focused on incremental branching, potential acquisitions, and the ongoing development of comprehensive retail and commercial customer account relationships.
Income and Expense Trends
          Table 1.2 shows the Company’s historical income statements for the past five fiscal years as well as for the most recent 12 month period through June 30, 2010. The Company has reported growth in net income in every period with the exception of fiscal 2008, when the Company reported a significant non-operating expense related to other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of the value of investment securities. Specifically, reported net income

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.14
Table 1.2
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Historical Income Statements
                                                                                                 
    As of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,     12 Months End.  
    2005     2006     2007     2008     2009     June 30, 2010  
    Amount     Pct(1)     Amount     Pct(1)     Amount     Pct(1)     Amount     Pct(1)     Amount     Pct(1)     Amount     Pct(1)  
    ($000)     (%)     ($000)     (%)     ($000)     (%)     ($000)     (%)     ($000)     (%)     ($000)     (%)  
Interest Income
  $ 48,600       5.11 %   $ 63,952       5.51 %   $ 73,877       5.77 %   $ 77,545       5.37 %   $ 76,062       4.92 %   $ 75,185       4.80 %
Interest Expense
  $ (16,514 )     -1.74 %   $ (27,649 )     -2.38 %   $ (35,577 )     -2.78 %   $ (34,946 )     -2.42 %   $ (29,775 )     -1.93 %   $ (24,905 )     -1.59 %
 
                                                                       
Net Interest Income
  $ 32,086       3.37 %   $ 36,303       3.13 %   $ 38,300       2.99 %   $ 42,599       2.95 %   $ 46,287       3.00 %   $ 50,280       3.21 %
Provision for Loan Losses
  $ (2,700 )     -0.28 %   $ (1,681 )     -0.14 %   $ (749 )     -0.06 %   $ (2,393 )     -0.17 %   $ (1,961 )     -0.13 %   $ (3,170 )     -0.20 %
 
                                                                       
Net Interest Income after Provisions
  $ 29,386       3.09 %   $ 34,622       2.98 %   $ 37,551       2.93 %   $ 40,206       2.79 %   $ 44,326       2.87 %   $ 47,110       3.01 %
 
                                                                                               
Other Operating Income
  $ 4,076       0.43 %   $ 4,625       0.40 %   $ 5,427       0.42 %   $ 5,513       0.38 %   $ 5,616       0.36 %   $ 6,291       0.40 %
Operating Expense
  $ (24,616 )     -2.59 %   $ (29,025 )     -2.50 %   $ (30,301 )     -2.36 %   $ (33,762 )     -2.34 %   $ (36,631 )     -2.37 %   $ (36,839 )     -2.35 %
 
                                                                       
Net Operating Income
  $ 8,846       0.93 %   $ 10,222       0.88 %   $ 12,677       0.99 %   $ 11,957       0.83 %   $ 13,311       0.86 %   $ 16,562       1.06 %
 
                                                                                               
Net Gain(Loss) on Sale of Loans
  $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $ 782       0.05 %   $ 977       0.06 %
Net Gain(Loss) on Sale of Securities
  $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $ 381       0.03 %   $ 936       0.06 %   $ 188       0.01 %
Contribution to Rockville Community Foundation
  $ (3,887 )     -0.41 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %
OTTI Charge on Securities (net)
  $       0.00 %   $       0.00 %   $ (233 )     -0.02 %   $ (14,881 )     -1.03 %   $ (362 )     -0.02 %   $ (5 )     0.00 %
 
                                                                       
Total Non-Operating Income/(Expense)
  $ (3,887 )     -0.41 %   $       0.00 %   $ (233 )     -0.02 %   $ (14,500 )     -1.01 %   $ 1,356       0.09 %   $ 1,160       0.07 %
 
                                                                                               
Net Income Before Tax
  $ 4,959       0.52 %   $ 10,222       0.88 %   $ 12,444       0.97 %   $ (2,543 )     -0.18 %   $ 14,667       0.95 %   $ 17,722       1.13 %
Income Taxes
  $ (1,533 )     -0.16 %   $ (3,368 )     -0.29 %   $ (4,116 )     -0.32 %   $ 956       0.07 %   $ (4,935 )     -0.32 %   $ (6,182 )     -0.39 %
 
                                                                       
Net Income (Loss) Before Extraord. Items
  $ 3,426       0.36 %   $ 6,854       0.59 %   $ 8,328       0.65 %   $ (1,587 )     -0.11 %   $ 9,732       0.63 %   $ 11,540       0.74 %
 
                                                                       
 
                                                                                               
Estimated Core Net Income
                                                                                               
Net Income
  $ 3,426       0.36 %   $ 6,854       0.59 %   $ 8,328       0.65 %   $ (1,587 )     -0.11 %   $ 9,732       0.63 %   $ 11,540       0.74 %
Addback(Deduct): Non-Recurring (Inc)/Exp
  $ 3,887       0.41 %   $       0.00 %   $ 233       0.02 %   $ 14,500       1.01 %   $ (1,356 )     -0.09 %   $ (1,160 )     -0.07 %
Tax Effect (2)
  $ (1,322 )     -0.14 %   $       0.00 %   $ (79 )     -0.01 %   $ (4,930 )     -0.34 %   $ 461       0.03 %   $ 394       0.03 %
 
                                                                       
Estimated Core Net Income
  $ 5,991       0.63 %   $ 6,854       0.59 %   $ 8,482       0.66 %   $ 7,983       0.55 %   $ 8,837       0.57 %   $ 10,774       0.69 %
 
                                                                       
 
                                                                                               
Memo:
                                                                                               
Expense Coverage Ratio
    130.35 %             125.07 %             126.40 %             126.17 %             126.36 %             136.49 %        
Efficiency Ratio
    68.07 %             70.92 %             69.30 %             70.17 %             70.58 %             65.12 %        
Effective Tax Rate
    30.91 %             32.95 %             33.08 %             37.59 %             33.65 %             34.88 %        
 
(1)   Ratios are a percent of average assets.
 
(2)   Tax effected at a 34% rate.
Sources: Rockville Financial’s prospectus and audited and unaudited financial reports.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.15
increased from $3.4 million (0.36% of average assets in fiscal 2005) to $11.5 million (0.74% of average assets) reported for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. Fiscal 2008 represented the exception to the Company’s earnings growth trend as a $1.6 million loss reported for the year was largely attributable to the $14.9 million OTTI expense. Rockville Financial’s core earnings, which consists of net income excluding net non-operating items on a tax effected basis, reflects a similar growth trend, increasing from $6.0 million (0.63% of average assets) in fiscal 2005, to $10.8 million (0.69% of average assets) for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. Growth in the Company’s reported and core profitability reflects the benefits of balance sheet growth, as growing operating costs have been effectively spread over an expanding asset base and as the Company’s net interest income has increased in recent periods, owing to both balance sheet growth and improving spreads. These trends are described more fully below.
      Net Interest Income
          As noted above, net interest income has realized steady growth in dollar terms, from $32.1 million in fiscal 2005, to $50.3 million reported for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, primarily reflecting the impact of balance sheet growth realized over the period. Over the corresponding timeframe, the Company’s net interest income to average assets ratio ranged from a low of 2.95% reported for fiscal 2008 to a high of 3.37% reported in fiscal 2005. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s net interest income to average assets ratio equaled 3.21%. The reduction in the Company’s ratio of net interest income to average assets from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2007 was the result of an increasing cost of funds, reflecting the impact of short term interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve. Comparatively, the increase in the net interest income ratio since 2008 has been facilitated by market interest rate trends, as the decline in short-term interest rates and resulting steeper yield curve has provided for a more significant decline in the Company’s funding costs relative to less rate sensitive interest-earning asset yields. In this regard, the Company’s cost of funds has recently benefited from the maturing of high cost CDs and borrowed funds bearing the relatively high interest rates which prevailed several years ago. Following the Second Step Offering, the offering proceeds should increase net interest income but have a limited impact on the Company’s overall spreads (see Exhibit I-4 for detailed information with respect to the Company’s historical yields, costs, and spreads).

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.16
      Loan Loss Provisions
          Loan loss provisions have been increasing reflecting the recessionary economic environment and the Company’s increased non-performing assets (“NPAs”). For the 12 months ended June 30, 2010, loan loss provisions totaled $3.2 million, or 0.20% of average assets, which was above the level for each of the prior four fiscal years. While NPAs and loan loss provisions have increased for Rockville Financial, they remain at moderate levels relative to the broader industry averages. In order to quickly resolve classified assets, Rockville Financial has established a Special Assets Committee that meets weekly and a risk committee that meets monthly to track problem loans and their possible resolution.
          Going forward, the Company will continue to evaluate the adequacy of the level of general valuation allowances (“GVAs”) on a regular basis, and establish additional loan loss provisions in accordance with the Company’s asset classification and loss reserve policies. Exhibit I-5 sets forth the Company’s loan loss allowance activity during the review period.
      Non-Interest Income
          The Company has historically had relatively modest levels of fee generating activities, and thus non-interest operating income has been a somewhat modest contributor to the overall earnings. Included in non-interest income are banking services on deposit accounts, ATM fees, BOLI, loan fee income, mortgage servicing income, and derivative financial instruments and brokerage and insurance fees from Infinex Investments, Inc. (“Infinex”), the on-premise provider of non-deposit investment service. Non-interest income has gradually increased since 2005, from $4.1 million, or 0.43% of average assets, to $6.3 million for the last twelve months, or 0.40% of average assets.
          Management will seek to increase the level of non-interest fee income primarily by continuing to expand fee generating broad based banking relationships, but any growth realized is expected to be gradual.
      Operating Expenses
          The Company’s operating expenses have increased in recent years due to asset growth, increased lending activities in both the residential and commercial portfolios, de novo branching and revenue diversification strategies. Specifically, cost increases reflect increased business volumes facilitated by the employment of seasoned commercial lenders and support staff, as well as the opening of nine full service branch offices since the end of fiscal 2005.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.17
While operating expenses have experienced a pronounced increase, commensurate asset growth resulted in limited growth of the ratio of operating expenses in relation to average assets. Specifically, in fiscal 2005 operating expenses equaled $24.6 million, or 2.59% of average assets, while operating expenses totaled $36.8 million, or 2.35% of average assets, for the most recent twelve months ended June 30, 2010.
          Operating expenses are expected to increase on a post-Offering basis as a result of the expense of the additional stock-related benefit plans. At the same time, Rockville Financial will seek to offset anticipated growth in expenses from a profitability standpoint through balance sheet growth and by reinvestment of the Offering proceeds into investment securities over the near term (following the Second Step Conversion) and into loans over the longer term.
      Non-Operating Income/Expense
          Non-operating income and expenses have typically had a limited impact on earnings over the last several years and have primarily consisted of gains on the sale of loans and investments. However, in 2008, non-operating income and expenses impacted the Company’s operations to a greater degree than the recent historical average as impairment losses on investment securities ($14.5 million) were recorded, resulting in a net non-operating expense of $14.5 million, net of a $381,000 gain on the sale of securities. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, net non-operating income totaled $1.2 million and consisted of $977,000 gains on the sales of loans, $188,000 gains on the sale of securities and a minimal $5,000 of OTTI expense on securities.
      Taxes
          The Company’s average tax expense has fluctuated over the last five fiscal periods, but has been in the range of 20.91% to 37.59%, and equaled 34.88% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. The Company is subject primarily to federal corporate taxation. While the state of Connecticut does impose a corporate income tax, Rockville Financial created a “passive investment company” (“PIC”), as permitted by Connecticut law which has minimized the Company’s state corporate income tax liability.
      Efficiency Ratio
          The Company’s efficiency ratio reflects improvement over the last twelve months largely owing to expansion of the net interest margin, which is attributable to both balance sheet

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.18
growth and improving spreads, while the ratio of the Company’s operating expenses to average assets has remained relatively unchanged. Specifically, the efficiency ratio diminished from 68.1% in fiscal 2005 to 65.1% reported for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. On a post-Offering basis, the efficiency ratio may show some improvement from the benefit of reinvesting the proceeds from the Offering. However, a portion of the benefit is expected to be offset by the increased expense of the stock benefit plans.
Interest Rate Risk Management
     The primary aspects of the Company’s interest rate risk management include:
  Ø   Diversifying portfolio loans into other types of shorter-term or adjustable rate lending, primarily focused on commercial lending;
 
  Ø   Maintaining an investment portfolio, comprised of high quality, liquid securities and maintaining an ample balance of securities classified as available for sale;
 
  Ø   Promoting transaction accounts and, when appropriate, longer term CDs;
 
  Ø   Utilizing longer-term borrowings when such funds are attractively priced relative to deposits and prevailing reinvestment opportunities;
 
  Ø   Maintaining a strong capital level;
 
  Ø   Increasing non-interest income;
 
  Ø   Limiting investment in fixed assets and other non-earning assets; and
 
  Ø   Selling a portion of the fixed rate mortgage loans originated based on risk and profitability considerations.
     The internal rate shock analysis as of June 30, 2010 reflects that the income at risk (or the change in net interest income) declines by 0.17% pursuant to a positive 400 basis point instantaneous and permanent rate shock, and diminishes by 0.61% pursuant to a 50 basis point instantaneous and permanent reduction in interest rates (see Exhibit I-6).
     Overall, the projected impact to the Company’s income at risk suggests that the Company’s exposure to rising interest rates up to a 400 basis point rate shock is limited, while we believe a reduction in rates is highly unlikely given that short-term rates are near zero in the current environment.
     The infusion of stock proceeds will serve to further limit the Company’s interest rate risk exposure, as most of the net proceeds will be redeployed into interest-earning assets and the increase in the Company’s capital position will lessen the proportion of interest rate sensitive liabilities funding assets.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.19
Lending Activities and Strategy
     The Company’s lending activities have been focused as follows: (1) permanent residential mortgage lending, including home equity lending and HELOCs; and (2) commercial mortgage and commercial business lending. Details regarding the Company’s loan portfolio composition and characteristics are included in Exhibits I-7 and I-8. As of June 30, 2010, the three major components of the loan portfolio were as follows:
    Permanent first mortgage loans secured by residential properties totaled $747.4 million, or 53.6% of total loans;
 
    Commercial mortgages totaled $449.5 million, or 32.2% of total loans; and
 
    Commercial business loans totaled $127.8 million, or 9.2% of total loans.
     The Company’s expanded commercial lending activities have resulted in the development of relatively large relationships. As of June 30, 2010, the ten largest lending relationships are with commercial borrowers totaling $149.4 million, reflecting an average balance of $14.9 million, with the largest relationship totaling $19.4 million extended to a large retail developer secured by three properties in Hartford County, Connecticut.
      Residential Lending
          As of June 30, 2010, the majority of the residential mortgage loans were fixed rate mortgages, with original maturities ranging from 10 to 30 years. The Company originates both fixed rate and adjustable rate 1-4 family loans and seeks to emphasize shorter term or adjustable rate mortgage (“ARMs”) loans for portfolio. The majority of the ARM loans in portfolio are hybrid loans with an initial period of fixed rates for either a 1, 3 ,4, 5, 7, or 9 year period and subject to annual repricing thereafter, indexed to a the one-year Constant Maturity Treasury Bill Index.
          The Company originates 1-4 family loans up to a loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of 97%, with private mortgage insurance (“PMI”) being required for loans in excess of an 80% LTV ratio. The substantial portion of 1-4 family mortgage loans have been originated by the Company and are secured by residences in the local market area.
          The Company also offers home equity loans including fixed rate amortizing term loans as well as variable rate lines of credit, or HELOCs. Such loans typically have shorter maturities and higher interest rates than first residential mortgage loans with comparable

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.20
durations. Home equity loans and lines totaled approximately $377.3 million, or 27.2% of total loans as of June 30, 2010, and the outstanding balance of fixed rate home equity loans was $62.2 million and HELOCs were $126.7 million, both of which were included in the residential mortgage loan balance of $754.8 million.
      Commercial Real Estate and Multi-family Mortgage Lending
          Commercial real estate lending has been a strategic focus for the Company in recent years, and the largest individual component of growth in the loan portfolio. Multifamily lending, on the other hand, has been relatively limited. The Company’s commercial mortgage loans are typically secured by properties in Connecticut and/or to customers of the Bank and are generally originated by the Company with the exception of loans originated through the regional commercial real estate lending program, as summarized below. As of June 30, 2010, commercial real estate mortgage loans together equaled $449.5 million (32.2% of loans) and were secured by a wide range of properties including owner-occupied, industrial, office, retail, multi-family and land/development loans. A summary of the commercial mortgage portfolio stratified by type of property is included as Exhibit I-9.
          Commercial mortgage loans may be made in amounts of up to 80% of the appraised value of the property and debt service coverage ratios of at least 1.15 times. These loans may be made with terms of up to 20 years and amortization schedules up to 30 years and are offered with interest rates that are fixed or adjust periodically and are generally indexed to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Classic Advance Rates. Pursuant to the Company’s credit risk management practice, the portfolio is continually monitored for concentration risks with respect to concentrations within geographies, type of borrower, type of security property, etc.
          In order to supplement the internal origination capacity and to diversify geographically, the Company introduced a regional commercial real estate lending program in 2006 that provides permanent and construction to permanent loans to qualified borrowers with properties located in New England, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. These loans are typically referred through a correspondent relationship that the Company has established with pre-approved mortgage banking companies throughout the aforementioned markets in the northeast U.S. By expanding the lending areas under this program, management perceives that the Company’s portfolio is benefited by geographic diversification as well as increased opportunities to make loans. At June 30, 2010, the portfolio had $155.1 million, or 34.5% of commercial real estate loans. Exhibit I-10 provides the amounts and

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.21
percentages of commercial real estate loans held by geographic location of the real property securing the loan as of June 30, 2010.
      Construction Loans
          Construction lending is a limited component of the loan portfolio, totaling $63.8 million, or 4.6% of the loan portfolio. The Company originates in-market residential and commercial construction loans to shorten the average duration of assets, and support asset yields. The Company generally limits such loans to known builders and developers with established relationships with the Company. Substantially all of the Company’s construction lending is secured by properties in north-central Connecticut. Construction loans generally have variable rates of interest, terms of up to 1 year (but most typically 9 months) and LTV ratios up to 80%. Construction lending has retrenched owing to limited construction in the current economic environment. However, the Company will continue to make loans on a select basis to customers with strong credit, long banking relationships, etc.
      Non-Mortgage Lending
          The Company’s C&I lending has recently been an area of emphasis in order to more fully develop full service commercial account relationships, including deposit relationships. As of June 30, 2010, C&I loans totaled $127.8 million, 9.2% of total loans. Included in the C&I loan balance is $23.8 million of loans that were guaranteed by either the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) or the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) at June 30, 2010.
          The Company makes commercial business loans primarily within Connecticut to a variety of professionals, sole proprietorships, and small businesses. Commercial business lending products include term loans and revolving lines of credit. The maximum amount of a commercial business loan is limited by Rockville Financial’s loans-to-one-borrower limit pursuant to Connecticut law. Such loans are generally used for longer-term working capital purposes such as purchasing equipment or financing short-term cash needs. Commercial business loans are made with either adjustable or fixed rates of interest. Variable rates are based on the prime rate, as published in The Wall Street Journal, plus a margin. Fixed rate commercial loans are set at a margin above the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Classic Advance Rates.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.22
          Consumer loans, excluding home equity loans and HELOCs, are generally offered to provide a broad line of loan products to customers and typically include loans on deposits, auto loans, and unsecured personal loans. As of June 30, 2010, consumer loans totaled $7.1 million, equal to 0.5% of total loans.
Origination, Purchasing, and Servicing of Loans
     The largest segment of the Company’s loan origination volume consists of residential mortgage loans, the vast majority of which are originated to customers through applications taken through the branches. The majority of the balance of the Company’s lending is commercial in nature and originated internally through the Company’s commercial loan officers and supplemented through correspondent relationships via the regional commercial real estate lending program.
     In addition to internal originations, the Company occasionally purchases loans guaranteed by USDA or SBA and adjustable rate one to four family residential mortgage loans from two local mortgage banking firms licensed with the Department. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and fiscal 2009, the Company purchased $82,000 and $2.5 million in adjustable rate loans from these firms.
     In the low interest rate environment which has prevailed for the last several years, the Company has been active in selling fixed rate residential mortgage loans into the secondary market for interest rate risk management purposes. Specifically, the Company originated $42.4 million of fixed rate one-to-four family residential loans during the six months ended June 30, 2010, $26.1 million of which were sold in the secondary market. Additionally, the Company originated $132.4 million of fixed rate one-to-four family residential loans during the year ended December 31, 2009, $44.0 million of which were sold in the secondary market. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company was servicing loans sold in the amount of $81.4 million and $57.7 million, respectively.
Asset Quality
     The Company has recently realized an increase in the level of NPAs, primarily related to the delinquency of commercial and residential mortgages. In this regard, the current economic environment has been a key contributor to the expanding level of classified assets, both as a result of job losses and declining collateral values. As reflected in Exhibit I-11, the total NPA balance (i.e., loans 90 days or more past due and other real estate owned (“OREO”)) as of June

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.23
30, 2010, was $17.3 million, equal to 1.08% of assets, consisting of non-accruing loans ($14.4 million) and OREO ($3.0 million). The ratio of allowances to total loans equaled 0.94%, while reserve coverage in relation to NPAs equaled 75.89%.
     The Company’s management reviews and classifies loans on a monthly basis and establishes loan loss provisions based on the overall quality, size, and composition of the loan portfolio, as well as other factors such as historical loss experience, industry trends and local real estate market and economic conditions.
Funding Composition and Strategy
     As of June 30, 2010, deposits totaled $1.2 billion. Lower costing savings and transaction accounts totaling $429.7 million comprised approximately 37.4% of the Company’s deposits at June 30, 2010 (see Exhibit I-12), while money market accounts comprised an additional 20.9% of deposits. Management believes that the growth in savings and transaction accounts and reduced reliance on CDs to fund operations is attributable to several factors including: (1) depositors preference for shorter term accounts in the low interest rate environment which has fueled the growth of money market accounts as well as disintermediation from the stock and bond markets; (2) intensified marketing efforts by the Company to develop broad-based consumer and commercial relationships which have resulted in growth of core deposits; (3) expanded delivery systems including significant growth of the branch office network and employment of alternative delivery technologies; and (4) ongoing consolidation of the banking industry in the market which has enhanced the ability to market the Company as a locally-owned and operated community bank.
     The balance of the deposit base is comprised of CDs, the majority of which have remaining maturities of one year or less. As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s balance of CDs equaled $480.5 million or 41.8% of the Company’s deposits (see Exhibit I-13).
     Borrowings have been utilized primarily as a supplemental funding source to fund lending activity and liquidity. As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s borrowings totaled $272.5 million, equal to 17.0% of total assets, consisting of FHLB advances and a line of credit. Borrowed funds have been employed both as a liquidity management tool to bolster funds when deposits fall short of the Company’s requirements and also as an interest rate risk management tool. Exhibit I-14 provides details of the Company’s use of borrowed funds as of June, 30, 2010.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
    I.24
Subsidiaries
     Presently, Rockville Bank is the only subsidiary of Rockville Financial and is incorporated in Connecticut. Rockville Bank currently has six wholly-owned subsidiaries: (1) SBR Mortgage Company, which operates as the Bank’s PIC, which exempts it from Connecticut income tax under current law; (2) SBR Investment Corp., Inc., which was established to maintain an ownership interest in Infinex, a third-party, non-affiliated registered broker-dealer that provides services for a number of banks, to their customers, including the Bank’s customers through Rockville Financial Services, Inc.; (3) Rockville Financial Services, Inc., which offers brokerage and investment advisory services through a contract with Infinex; (4) Rockville Bank Commercial Properties, Inc., which was established to hold certain commercial real estate acquired through foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or other similar means; (5) Rockville Bank Residential Properties, Inc., which was established to hold certain residential real estate acquired through foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or other similar means; and, (6) Rockville Bank Mortgage, Inc., which was formerly the Family Choice Mortgage Company, whose assets were acquired in January 2010 to expand the Bank’s mortgage origination business.
Legal Proceedings
     As of June 30, 2010, the Company is not currently involved in any litigation which is expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or operations.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.1
II. MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
Introduction
     Rockville Financial was established in 1858 and currently serves the north-central area of Connecticut. Over the years, the Company has grown to a 22-branch operation, with full-service locations in Hartford, New London, and Tolland Counties, as well as a limited service branch located in a South Windsor High School. In addition, the Company delivers its banking products and services and related information services through alternative delivery mechanisms including the Internet, a telephone call center and 42 ATMs, including 13 stand-alone ATM facilities. The Company’s main office in South Windsor is located about 15 miles west of Hartford. The Company’s headquarters and the majority of its branches are located within the Hartford metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”). The Bank’s branch banking locations are primarily located in the north-central portion of Connecticut while lending operations encompass a greater area across much of Connecticut and southern Massachusetts.
     The Hartford MSA is the nation’s 44th largest metropolitan area in terms of total population. Based on 2010 census data, the MSA population was estimated at 1.2 million. The three counties served by the Company’s branches had a total population of approximately 1.3 million. The Hartford area’s economy is based on a diverse business and industrial community. The MSA ranks number one in the U.S. in gross domestic product per capita and number two in the world in labor productivity. Long a powerful insurance and financial center, it also boasts an extensive list of major high-tech manufacturing firms producing such complex products as aircraft engines, nuclear reactors, space suits, and missile components. Other industries in the area include health care and retail.
     The Hartford MSA today is a major center for insurance and financial services, as mentioned previously, and Rockville Financial competes with a number of very large financial institutions that are either headquartered or maintain office networks in north-central Connecticut. Some of the larger commercial banks and thrifts operating in the Company’s market include Bank of America, Webster Financial Corp., TD Bank, and People’s United Financial. Overall, the magnitude of the competition that Rockville Financial faces is apparent with more than 328 financial institution branches in Hartford, Tolland, and New London Counties within a 10 mile radius of a Rockville Bank branch, as shown in Table 2.1.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.2
Table 2.1
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Deposit Market Share
                                 
Company   Headquarters       Branches     Deposits  
                    ($000)     (%)  
Rockville Financial Inc.
  South Windsor   CT     22     $ 1,121,983       3.9 %
 
                               
Deposit Competitors (1)
                               
Bank of America Corp.
  Charlotte   NC     61     $ 12,229,887       42.0 %
Webster Financial Corp.
  Waterbury   CT     43     $ 2,977,991       10.2 %
First Niagara Finl Group
  Buffalo   NY     36     $ 2,082,029       7.2 %
People’s United Financial Inc.
  Bridgeport   CT     35     $ 1,484,711       5.1 %
Toronto-Dominion Bank
  Toronto       31     $ 2,592,057       8.9 %
Banco Santander S.A.
  Boadilla del Monte       21     $ 1,654,059       5.7 %
Royal Bank of Scotland Group
  Edinburgh       20     $ 876,623       3.0 %
Liberty Bank
  Middletown   CT     19     $ 1,370,163       4.7 %
American Eagle FCU
  East Hartford   CT     13     $ 1,045,648       3.6 %
United Financial Bancorp
  West Springfield   MA     9     $ 523,409       1.8 %
SI Financial Group Inc. (MHC)
  Willimantic   CT     9     $ 259,729       0.9 %
New England Bancshares
  Enfield   CT     8     $ 237,416       0.8 %
Connecticut Bank and Trust Co.
  Hartford   CT     8     $ 184,691       0.6 %
Peoplesbancorp MHC
  Holyoke   MA     8     $ 230,727       0.8 %
Berkshire Hills Bancorp Inc.
  Pittsfield   MA     7     $ 245,355       0.8 %
 
                         
Total for All Competitors
            328     $ 29,116,478       100.0 %
 
                         
 
(1)   Defined for purposes of this presentation as institutions maintaining a branch office within 10 miles of a Rockville Bank branch.
Source: SNL Securities based on June 2009 deposit data.
     The significant level of competition is demonstrated numerically in the schedule above which reflects that the two largest competitors for the Bank (as defined by financial institutions with branches within a 10 mile radius of the Bank’s branches) have over half of the deposit market share. Importantly, there are many other competitors, in terms of thrifts, commercial banks, and credit unions in the market, as well. These numbers do not include competition from mortgage banking companies, investment houses, mutual funds and other sources.
     The largest competitors in the markets served by the Company are comprised of some of the largest financial institutions in Connecticut and the nation as a whole. In this regard, Bank of America holds the largest market share in Hartford County, with an approximate 41% market share (42% surrounding all Bank branch locations) and Royal Bank of Scotland holds the largest market share in New London County, with approximately 28.5% of the county’s deposits,

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.3
however only holding 3% of the market share surrounding the Bank’s branch locations, as shown in Table 2.1. In the smaller area of Tolland County, NewAlliance Bancshares currently holds the largest market share with approximately 30% of deposits and 7.2% of deposits surrounding the Bank’s branch locations. However, the recently announced acquisition of NewAlliance Bancshares by First Niagara Financial Group may be beneficial to Rockville Financial, due to deposit-runoff resulting from the acquisition, as Rockville holds the second largest market share in Tolland County with 25% of the county’s deposits. Based on the most recent branch deposit data, the Company held approximately 2% of the Hartford County deposit market and less than 1% of the New London County deposit market, revealing the Company’s very competitive market.
     The Company intends to continue expanding its regional branch office network through the acquisition of branches or whole institutions if such opportunities should arise, however none are planned at this time. A map showing the Company’s office coverage is set forth below and details regarding the Company’s offices and recent trends with respect to market interest rate levels are set forth in Exhibit II-1 and II-2, respectively.
(GIF)

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.4
Market Area Demographics
     Key demographic and economic indicators in the Company’s market include population, number of households and household/per capita income levels. Trends in these key measures are summarized by the data presented in Table 2.2 from 2000 to 2010, and projected through 2015. Data for the nation and the state of Connecticut is included for comparative purposes. The market area population ranges from 150,000 to 885,000 residents in Tolland and Hartford Counties. New London County reported a population of 266,000 residents in 2010. Additionally, the population of Tolland County has increased at a relatively strong 1.0% annual rate since 2000, while the populations of Hartford and New London Counties have increased at comparatively modest paces of 0.3% over the corresponding time frame.
     Population growth trends are also relatively favorable for the business environment generally as population growth has been strong, with Tolland County registering some of the strongest growth trends in the state of Connecticut, supported in part by the presence of the University of Connecticut. New London and Hartford Counties reflect more limited growth trends which are comparable to the Connecticut average of 0.4%. The population of Tolland County is projected to increase at a 0.4% annual pace through 2015, which is above the expected increase for the state as a whole.
     Growth trends with regard to households have paralleled the population growth trends, with the Company’s markets in Tolland County generally experiencing faster household growth rates to the prevailing average for Connecticut, and matching the U.S aggregate. New London County is growing at the same pace as the state, but below the U.S. aggregate, while Hartford County is growing at a moderate pace below both the state and national aggregates. Specifically, the number of households in Tolland County increased at a 1.0% annual pace in the last 10 years as compared to 0.4% and 0.3% for New London and Hartford Counties.
     Median household levels in the market area are relatively high ($78,072 for Tolland County, $64,743 for New London County and $64,279 for Hartford County as of 2010) in comparison to both the state and national averages ($70,340 and $54,442 respectively). Likewise, per capita income levels as of 2010 equaled $36,149, $30,787, and $32,159 for Tolland, New London, and Hartford Counties, respectively, which are also well above the national aggregate. The state of Connecticut is the wealthiest state in the country, although, among the primary market area counties served by the Company’s branches, only Tolland

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.5
Table 2.2
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Summary Demographic Data
                                         
    Year     Annual Growth Rate  
    2000     2010     2015     2000-2010     2010-2015  
Population (000)
                                       
United States
    281,422       311,213       323,209       1.0 %     0.8 %
Connecticut
    3,406       3,536       3,569       0.4 %     0.2 %
New London County
    259       266       266       0.3 %     0.0 %
Tolland County
    136       150       153       1.0 %     0.4 %
Hartford County
    857       885       894       0.3 %     0.2 %
 
                                       
Households (000)
                                       
United States
    105,480       116,761       121,360       1.0 %     0.8 %
Connecticut
    1,302       1,353       1,366       0.4 %     0.2 %
New London County
    100       104       105       0.4 %     0.1 %
Tolland County
    49       55       56       1.0 %     0.5 %
Hartford County
    335       345       348       0.3 %     0.2 %
 
                                       
Median Household Income ($)
                                       
United States
    42,164       54,442       61,189       2.6 %     2.4 %
Connecticut
    53,915       70,340       80,697       2.7 %     2.5 %
New London County
    50,659       64,743       73,341       2.5 %     2.8 %
Tolland County
    59,035       78,072       90,158       2.8 %     2.6 %
Hartford County
    50,777       64,279       73,953       2.4 %     2.2 %
 
                                       
Per Capita Income ($)
                                       
United States
    21,587       26,739       30,241       2.2 %     2.5 %
Connecticut
    28,766       36,065       41,464       2.3 %     2.8 %
New London County
    24,678       30,787       34,926       2.2 %     2.6 %
Tolland County
    25,474       36,149       40,219       3.6 %     2.2 %
Hartford County
    26,047       32,159       36,863       2.1 %     2.8 %
 
                                       
 
  Less Than $25,000     $25,000 to
49,999
      $50,000 to
$99,999
    $ 100,000+          
 
                               
2010 HH Income Dist. (%)
                                       
United States
    20.8 %     24.7 %     35.7 %     18.8 %        
Connecticut
    14.9 %     18.0 %     38.4 %     28.8 %        
New London County
    13.9 %     20.7 %     45.6 %     19.7 %        
Tolland County
    10.6 %     12.9 %     39.2 %     37.4 %        
Hartford County
    16.7 %     20.6 %     39.6 %     23.2 %        
Source: SNL Financial.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.6
County had per capita income measures that exceeded Connecticut’s per capita income of $36,065 for 2010. Household income distribution patterns provide empirical support for earlier statements regarding the affluent nature of the market area as 37% (in Tolland County), 23% (in Hartford County), and 20% (in New London County) of all households had income levels in excess of $100,000 annually in 2010, exceeding the US aggregate of 19%. Tolland County exceeded the Connecticut aggregate of 29%, while the proportion of affluent households in New London and Hartford Counties fell short of the rate for Connecticut.
Summary of Local Economy
      Real Estate Market
               According to The Warren Group, which tracks real estate trends in New England, single-family house sales in Connecticut surged 33% in June 2010, boosted by the federal home buyer tax credit, and the median sale price rose for the seventh month in a row. The median sale price in June 2010 rose about 3% to $264,900, compared with $257,000 for the same month a year ago. June 2010 single-family house sales, statewide, increased to 3,477, compared with 2,612 a year ago. It was the first time sales exceeded 3,000 since August 2007.
               In Hartford County, (where the Company is headquartered and operates 14 branches) sales rose 16.4% to 882, compared with 758 a year ago and the median sale price declined 3.8% to $232,750 in June 2010 from $242,000 a year prior. Statewide, sales rose in all eight of Connecticut’s counties, with Fairfield County reporting the highest increase of 62%. The median sales price, however, declined in all but Fairfield and Tolland Counties, while the Hartford MSA median sales price for a single-family home increased 0.8% to $236,000, compared to a year ago. Based on the above data and the Company’s relatively good asset quality, the real estate trends in the Company’s market area seem relatively stable.
      Regional Employment
               The economy of the Company’s markets has several large components. Comparative employment data is illustrated in Table 2.3. Consistent with U.S. employment data, service jobs represent the largest employment sector in Connecticut and the service sector has added the most jobs over the past few years. Wholesale/retail trade, government, and finance, insurance, and real estate comprised the other major employment sectors in Connecticut. The data shows that employment in services constitutes the primary source of employment in all three of the counties, followed by government jobs in New London and

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.7
Tolland Counties, respectively. Meanwhile, financial services jobs were the second source of jobs in Hartford County, as the Hartford MSA is home to a number of large insurance companies. In line with national and state trends, service jobs have generally been the primary source of job growth in the primary market area counties, as reported by REIS Datasource 2007 data.
     Long known as the “Insurance Capital of the World,” the Hartford MSA is home to seven major insurance firms: Aetna Inc., Travelers Property Casualty Corp., The Hartford Financial Services Group, CIGNA, The Phoenix Companies, and The United Health Care Company. Additionally, MassMutual, headquartered in nearby Springfield, Massachusetts employs many Connecticut residents. The area’s manufacturing sector includes many Fortune 500 corporations and large multinational organizations. Among the best known are the Barnes Group and United Technologies Corporation, its division’s Hamilton Sundstrand and Pratt & Whitney, along with its subsidiary Otis Elevator. Henkel Loctite Corporation has its world headquarters in the area and Stanley Works produces tools and hardware in the region. Still, the region’s backbone is small- to mid-size businesses. Specifically, the Hartford MSA ranked number five out of the top metro areas for “best places to launch a small business” in 2009. Specialty manufacturing and technology firms also do well in Hartford, as it’s one of the most-wired cities in the U.S., much to the assistance of programs like “Wireless Hartford,” which brings free Wi-Fi to zones targeted for development. In addition, manufacturers that relocate to or expand into the Hartford MSA may be eligible for property tax abatements and corporate tax credits.
Table 2.3 Rockville Financial, Inc.
Primary Market Area Employment Sectors
(Percent of Labor Force)(1)
                                 
Employment Sector   Connecticut     New London     Tolland     Hartford  
    (% of Total Employment)  
Services
    38.7 %     32.6 %     34.1 %     36.8 %
Government
    12.0 %     27.3 %     23.4 %     11.8 %
Wholesale/Retail Trade
    13.9 %     12.4 %     10.8 %     13.6 %
Construction
    5.9 %     5.0 %     8.0 %   NA
Finance/Insurance/Real Esate
    11.9 %     5.3 %     7.4 %     14.4 %
Manufacturing
    8.9 %     9.3 %     6.4 %     9.8 %
Transportation/Utility
    2.7 %     3.0 %     2.1 %     2.8 %
Arts/Entertainment/Rec.
    2.1 %     2.2 %     2.5 %     1.7 %
Agriculture
    0.4 %     1.0 %     1.1 %     0.4 %
Other
    3.5 %     1.9 %     4.2 %     8.7 %
 
                         
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Source: REIS DataSource 2007.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.8
Unemployment Trends
     Unemployment trends in the market area and Connecticut are displayed in Table 2.4. The data indicates that the July 2010 unemployment rate of 8.9% for Connecticut was slightly below the comparable U.S. unemployment rate of 9.5%. The unemployment rate for the state of Connecticut was higher in July 2010 compared to July 2009. July 2010 unemployment rates for the primary market area counties ranged from a low of 8.3% in Tolland County to 9.9% in Hartford County. With the exception of Hartford County, all of the primary market area counties had July 2010 unemployment rates that were lower than the comparable Connecticut unemployment rate and U.S. aggregate. All of the primary market area counties recorded higher unemployment rates for July 2010 compared to the year ago period, which parallels the trends for Connecticut and the U.S.
Table 2.4
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Market Area Unemployment Trends
                 
    July 2009   July 2010
United States
    9.4 %     9.5 %
Connecticut
    8.5 %     8.9 %
Hartford County
    9.1 %     9.9 %
New London County
    7.8 %     8.8 %
Tolland County
    7.5 %     8.3 %
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Market Area Deposit Characteristics
     Competition among financial institutions in the Company’s market is significant. As larger institutions compete for market share to achieve economies of scale, the environment for the Company’s products and services is expected to become increasingly competitive. Community-sized institutions such as Rockville Financial typically compete with larger institutions on pricing or operate in a “niche” that will allow for operating margins to be maintained at profitable levels. The Company’s business plan reflects elements of both strategies.
     Table 2.5 displays deposit market trends over recent years for Hartford, New London, and Tolland Counties. Annual deposit growth in Hartford, New London, and Tolland Counties over the last four years equaled 4.1%, 3.7%, and 3.5%, respectively. Hartford County is

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   MARKET AREA ANALYSIS
    II.9
dominated by commercial banks, which hold an approximate 70% of the market share, while New London and Tolland Counties are both dominated by savings institutions, which hold 56.8% and 81.2% of the county deposit market share. Competition for deposits in Connecticut, in general is intense, as the overall size and stability of the Connecticut market makes it very attractive to financial institutions. The Company’s annual deposit growth of 15.0% was highest in Hartford County, where 12 branches are located, although the Company only holds 2.0% of the deposit market share. The Company held the largest deposit market share in Tolland County as of June 30, 2009, holding 25.1% of the county deposits, where Rockville Financial operates eight branches. The Company maintains a minimal 0.4% of the deposit market share in New London County, where the Company only operates a single branch office.
Table 2.5
Rockville Financial, Inc.
Deposit Summary
                                                         
    As of June 30,        
    2005     2009     Deposit  
            Market     No. of             Market     No. of     Growth Rate  
    Deposits     Share     Branches     Deposits     Share     Branches     2005-2009  
    (Dollars In Thousands)     (%)  
Deposit Summary
                                                       
 
                                                       
State of Connecticut
  $ 76,936,000       100.0 %     1,197     $ 90,638,000       100.0 %     1,216       4.2 %
Commercial Banks
    44,120,000       57.3 %     598       56,216,000       90.7 %     708       6.2 %
Savings Institutions
    32,816,000       42.7 %     599       34,422,000       9.3 %     508       1.2 %
 
                                                       
New London County
  $ 3,937,567       100.0 %     87     $ 4,557,810       100.0 %     94       3.7 %
Commercial Banks
    580,633       14.7 %     19       1,966,919       43.2 %     33       35.7 %
Savings Institutions
    3,356,934       85.3 %     68       2,590,891       56.8 %     61       -6.3 %
Rockville Financial
    0       0.0 %     0       16,557       0.4 %     1     NA
 
                                                       
Tolland County
  $ 1,851,201       100.0 %     39     $ 2,123,009       100.0 %     42       3.5 %
Commercial Banks
    314,653       17.0 %     8       398,184       18.8 %     10       6.1 %
Savings Institutions
    1,536,548       83.0 %     31       1,724,825       81.2 %     32       2.9 %
Rockville Financial
    432,374       23.4 %     7       532,009       25.1 %     8       5.3 %
 
                                                       
Hartford County
  $ 23,998,452       100.0 %     271     $ 28,198,226       100.0 %     281       4.1 %
Commercial Banks
    17,487,073       72.9 %     142       19,771,105       70.1 %     161       3.1 %
Savings Institutions
    6,511,379       27.1 %     129       8,427,121       29.9 %     120       6.7 %
Rockville Financial
    327,558       1.4 %     9       573,417       2.0 %     12       15.0 %
Source: FDIC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.1
III. PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
     This chapter presents an analysis of Rockville Financial’s operations versus a group of comparable savings institutions (the “Peer Group”) selected from the universe of all publicly-traded savings institutions in a manner consistent with the regulatory valuation guidelines and other regulatory guidance. The basis of the pro forma market valuation of Rockville Financial is derived from the pricing ratios of the Peer Group institutions, incorporating valuation adjustments for key differences in relation to the Peer Group. Since no Peer Group can be exactly comparable to Rockville Financial, key areas examined for differences to determine if valuation adjustments are appropriate in the following areas: financial condition; profitability, growth and viability of earnings; asset growth; primary market area; dividends; liquidity of the shares; marketing of the issue; management; and effect of government regulations and regulatory reform.
Peer Group Selection
     The Peer Group selection process is governed by the general parameters set forth in the regulatory valuation guidelines and other regulatory guidance. The Peer Group is comprised of only those publicly-traded thrifts whose common stock is either listed on a national exchange (NYSE or AMEX) or is NASDAQ listed, since their stock trading activity is regularly reported and generally more frequent than “non-listed thrifts” i.e., those listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or Pink Sheets, as well as those that are non-publicly traded and closely-held. Non-listed institutions are inappropriate since the trading activity for thinly-traded or closely-held stocks is typically highly irregular in terms of frequency and price and thus may not be a reliable indicator of market value. We have also excluded from the Peer Group those companies under acquisition or subject to rumored acquisition, mutual holding companies and recent conversions, since their pricing ratios are subject to unusual distortion and/or have limited trading history. We excluded those that were converted less than one year as their financial results do not reflect a full year of reinvestment benefit and since the stock trading activity is not seasoned. A recent listing of the universe of all publicly-traded savings institutions is included as Exhibit III-1.
     Ideally, the Peer Group should be comprised of locally or regionally-based institutions with relatively comparable resources, strategies and financial characteristics. There are approximately 142 publicly-traded thrift institutions nationally, which includes approximately 32 publicly-traded MHCs. Given the limited number of public full stock thrifts, it is typically the case

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.2
that the Peer Group will be comprised of institutions which are not directly comparable, but the overall group will still be the “best fit” group. To the extent that key differences exist between the converting institution and the Peer Group, valuation adjustments will be applied to account for such key differences. Since Rockville Financial will be a full stock public company upon completion of the Second Step Conversion offering, we considered only full stock companies to be viable candidates for inclusion in the Peer Group, excluding those in MHC form.
     Based on the foregoing, from the universe of publicly-traded thrifts, we selected 13 institutions with characteristics similar to those of Rockville Financial. In the selection process, we applied two “screens” to the universe of all public thrifts that were eligible for consideration:
  o   Screen #1 — Northeast thrifts with assets between $700 million and $3.0 billion, tangible equity-to-assets ratios of greater than 6.0% and positive core earnings.
 
      Six thrifts met the criteria for Screen #1 and all were included in the Peer Group: Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts, Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts, Hingham Institution for Savings of Massachusetts, New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares of New Hampshire, United Financial Bancorp of Massachusetts and Westfield Financial of Massachusetts. Exhibit III-2 provides financial and public market pricing characteristics of all publicly-traded Northeast thrifts.
 
  o   Screen #2 — Mid-Atlantic thrifts with assets between $700 million and $3.0 billion, tangible equity-to-assets ratios of greater than 6.0% and positive core earnings.
 
      Nine thrifts met the criteria for Screen #2 and seven were included in the Peer Group: Beacon Federal Bancorp of New York, ESB Financial Corp. of Pennsylvania, ESSA Bancorp of Pennsylvania, Harleysville Savings Financial of Pennsylvania, OceanFirst Financial Corp of New Jersey, Provident NY Bancorp, Inc. of New York, and TF Financial Corp. of Pennsylvania. The other two thrifts were excluded since they completed their conversions within the past year: Ocean Shore Holding of New Jersey (completed December 21, 2009) and Oritani Financial Corp. of New Jersey (completed June 24, 2010). Exhibit III-3 provides financial and public market pricing characteristics of all publicly-traded Mid-Atlantic thrifts.
     Table 3.1 shows the general characteristics of each of the 13 Peer Group companies and Exhibit III-4 provides summary demographic and deposit market share data for the primary market areas served by each of the Peer Group companies. While there are expectedly some differences between the Peer Group companies and Rockville Financial, we believe that the Peer Group companies, on average, provide a good basis for valuation subject to valuation adjustments. The following sections present a comparison of Rockville Financial’s financial condition, income and expense trends, loan composition, interest rate risk and credit risk versus the Peer Group as of the most recent publicly available date.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.3
Table 3.1
Peer Group of Publicly-Traded Thrifts August
26, 2010
                                                                 
                Operating   Total           Fiscal   Conv.   Stock   Market
Ticker   Financial Institution   Exchange   Primary Market   Strategy(1)   Assets(2)   Offices   Year   Date   Price   Value
                                                    ($)   ($Mil)
PBNY
  Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY   NASDAQ   Montebello, NY   Thrift   $ 2,964       35       9-30       01/04     $ 7.95     $ 307  
BRKL
  Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   Brookline, MA   Thrift   $ 2,660       18       12-31       07/02     $ 9.20     $ 543  
DNBK
  Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   Danvers, MA   Thrift   $ 2,529       26       12-31       01/08     $ 15.11     $ 323  
OCFC
  OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ   NASDAQ   Toms River, NJ   Thrift   $ 2,220       23       12-31       07/96     $ 11.49     $ 216  
ESBF
  ESB Financial Corp. of PA   NASDAQ   Ellwood City, PA   Thrift   $ 1,948       24       12-31       06/90     $ 12.86     $ 155  
UBNK
  United Financial Bancorp of MA   NASDAQ   W. Springfield, MA   Thrift   $ 1,545       24       12-31       12/07     $ 13.66     $ 223  
WFD
  Westfield Financial Inc. of MA   NASDAQ   Westfield, MA   Thrift   $ 1,235       11       12-31       01/07     $ 7.48     $ 219  
BFED
  Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY   NASDAQ   East Syracuse, NY   Thrift   $ 1,072       8       12-31       10/07     $ 10.00     $ 65  
ESSA
  ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA   NASDAQ   Stroudsburg, PA   Thrift   $ 1,067       14       09-30       04/07     $ 11.00     $ 149  
NHTB
  NH Thrift Bancshares of NH   NASDAQ   Newport, NH   Thrift   $ 993       27       12-31       05/86     $ 10.00     $ 58  
HIFS
  Hingham Institute for Savings of MA   NASDAQ   Hingham, MA   Thrift   $ 972       10       12-31       12/88     $ 38.47     $ 82  
HARL
  Harleysville Savings Financial Corp. of PA   NASDAQ   Harleysville, PA   Thrift   $ 867       7       09-30       08/87     $ 15.39     $ 57  
THRD
  TF Financial Corp. of Newtown PA   NASDAQ   Newtown, PA   Thrift   $ 721       14       12-31       07/94     $ 21.40     $ 57  
 
NOTES:    (1) Operating strategies are: Thrift=Traditional Thrift, M.B.=Mortgage Banker, R.E.=Real Estate Developer,
 
        Div.=Diversified and Ret.=Retail Banking.
 
  (2) Most recent quarter end available (E=Estimated and P=Pro Forma).
 
Source:   SNL Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.4
     In addition to the selection criteria used to identify the Peer Group companies, a summary description of the key comparable characteristics of each of the Peer Group companies relative to Rockville Financial’s characteristics is detailed below.
  Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY (“BFED”). BFED operates through a total of 8 offices including 3 branches in upstate New York as well as branches in Massachusetts, Tennessee and Texas, reflecting its legacy as a converted credit union. Also reflecting its status as a former credit union, BFED’s loan portfolio has the second largest proportion of consumer loan in comparison to the Peer Group companies, although permanent 1-4 family mortgage loans comprise the largest segment of lending. Asset quality ratios are less favorable in relation to the Peer Group average. At June 30, 2010, BFED had total assets of $1.1 billion, a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 9.9% and reported a ROA of 0.48% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.
  Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts (“BRKL”). BRKL operates through 20 branches in Massachusetts. BRKL has the highest tangible equity to assets ratio of 17.2% among the Peer Group members, reflecting the continuing impact of its completion of a second step conversion in July 2002. BRKL has the highest concentration of commercial real estate loans among the Peer Group members, which results in its higher risk weighted assets. At June 30, 2010, BRKL had total assets of $1.6 billion and for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, BRKL reported a ROA of 0.96%.
  Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts (“DNBK”). DNBK operates through its headquarters office in Danvers, Massachusetts and through 26 other branch offices throughout Massachusetts. DNBK has the highest operating expense ratio among the Peer Group members due to their diversified operations into wealth management and trust services. DNBK is also diversified in its lending strategy. As of June 30, 2010, DNBK reported $2.5 billion in assets, 10.4% of tangible equity to assets, as well as a ROA of 0.58% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.
  ESB Financial Corp. of Pennsylvania (“ESBF”). ESBF operates 24 offices through three counties in southwestern Pennsylvania. ESBF operates with a lower tangible equity to assets ratio as compared to the Peer Group average, at 6.8%, but ESBF maintained comparatively lower NPAs to assets ratio, due to its less diversified loan portfolio and high portion of assets in MBS. ESBF reported assets of $1.9 billion as of June 30, 2010 and a ROA of 0.66% for the latest twelve month period.
  ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA (“ESSA”). ESSA operates 14 branch offices in northeastern Pennsylvania. ESSA maintains a high proportion of residential mortgage loans and a low proportion of higher risk-weight construction and commercial mortgage loans relative to the Peer Group average. Earnings approximate the Peer Group’s average, notwithstanding ESSA’s high capital ratio (the result of the completion of its standard conversion transaction in April 2007). At June 30, 2010, ESSA had total assets of $1.1 billion and a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 16.6%, as well as a ROA of 0.46%, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.
  Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation of PA (“HARL”). HARL operates 7 offices in the Philadelphia MSA. HARL’s balance sheet structure partially reflects a wholesale leveraging strategy based on its relatively high proportion of investment securities and borrowings to assets in comparison to loans and deposits, respectively.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.5
    HARL’s ROE is slightly higher than the Peer Group while NPAs were much lower. At June 30, 2010, HARL had a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 6.1%, more leverage than the Peer Group average. As of June 30, 2010 HARL reported $844 million of assets and a ROA of 0.59% for the latest twelve months period.
  Hingham Institution for Savings of Massachusetts (“HIFS”). HIFS operates through 10 offices in the Boston MSA. HIFS maintained an inflated ratio of NPAs to assets relative to the Peer Group average. At June 30, 2010, HIFS reported total assets of $972 million, a tangible equity/assets ratio of 7.1% and ROA of 0.99% for the last twelve months, which were below and above the Peer Group averages.
  New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares of New Hampshire (“NHTB”). NHTB operates through 27 branch offices in central New Hampshire. NHTB’s balance sheet included a similar loans-to-assets ratio to the Peer Group and NHTBs’ tangible equity/assets ratio reflects greater leverage (6.57% ratio) than Rockville on a pro forma basis. As of June 30, 2010 NHTB reported total assets of $939 million and a ROAA of 0.74% for the latest twelve month period, which was modestly above the Peer Group average.
  OceanFirst Financial Corp of New Jersey (“OCFC”). OCFC operates through a total of 23 branches in eastern New Jersey. OCFC maintained a less diversified loan portfolio than compared to the Peer Group. At June 30, 2010, OCFC reported total assets of $2.2 billion, a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 8.8% and reported a ROA of 0.75% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, which was the highest ROA among the Peer Group members.
  Provident NY Bancorp, Inc. of New York (“PBNY”). PBNY operates through 35 retail banking offices in the Hudson Valley region of New York. NPAs are slightly higher then the Peer Group average and PBNY’s ROA approximates the Peer Group average. At June 30, 2010, PBNY reported total assets of $3.0 billion, the highest in the Peer Group, reported a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 9.4% and an ROA of 0.68% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.
  TF Financial Corporation of PA (“THRD”). THRD operates 14 branches in the Philadelphia metropolitan area. THRD maintained a ratio of NPAs to assets which was well above the average for the Peer Group. At June 30, 2010 THRD reported total assets of $721 million, a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 9.5% and a 12 month ROA of 0.55%, both of which were slightly lower than the Peer Group average.
  United Financial Bancorp of Massachusetts (“UBNK”). UBNK operates through 24 offices throughout western Massachusetts. UBNK’s NPAs to assets ratio was above the Peer Group average, due to its diversified loan portfolio and high risk weighted assets ratio. UBNK also reported a tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 14.0% that was also above the Peer Group average. UBNK reported total assets of $1.5 billion and a ROA of 0.55% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.
  Westfield Financial, Inc. of MA (“WFD”). WFD operates through a total of 11 offices in western Massachusetts. The ratio of NPAs/Assets is below the Peer Group average. WFD’s ROA was also below the Peer Group average, reporting the lowest ROA of the Peer Group. WFD reported the highest tangible equity-to-assets ratio of 19.4% among the Peer Group members, due to their recent conversion in January 2007. As of June 30, 2010, WFD reported total assets of $1.2 billion and a ROA of 0.34% for the latest twelve month period.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.6
     In the aggregate, the Peer Group companies maintain a similar tangible equity level in comparison to the industry average (10.91% of assets versus 10.56% for all public companies) and generate a higher level of core profitability (0.59% of average assets for the Peer Group versus a loss of 0.23% of average assets for all public companies). Accordingly, the Peer Group companies have a positive core ROE, whereas all public companies have a negative core ROE (5.82% for the Peer Group versus -0.63% for all public companies). Overall, the Peer Group’s pricing ratios were at a modest premium to all publicly traded thrift institutions on a P/TB and P/A basis and was comparable to all publicly traded thrifts on a Price/Core earnings basis (however many public companies did not have meaningful core earnings multiples owing to their trailing twelve month loss position).
                 
    All    
    Public-Thrifts (1)   Peer Group
Financial Characteristics (Averages)
               
Assets ($Mil)
  $ 2,930     $ 1,599  
Market Capitalization ($Mil)
  $ 311     $ 189  
Tangible Equity/Assets (%)
    10.56 %     10.91 %
Core Return on Average Assets (%)
    (0.23 %)     0.59 %
Core Return on Average Equity (%)
    (0.63 %)     5.82 %
 
               
Pricing Ratios (Averages)(1)
               
Price/Core Earnings (x)
    17.69 x     18.15 x
Price/Tangible Book (%)
    77.62 %     103.83 %
Price/Assets (%)
    8.10 %     10.94 %
 
(1)   Based on market prices as of August 26, 2010.
     The thrifts selected for the Peer Group were relatively comparable to Rockville Financial in terms of all of the selection criteria and are considered the “best fit” group. While there are many similarities between Rockville Financial and the Peer Group on average, there are some notable differences that lead to valuation adjustments. The following comparative analysis highlights key similarities and differences between Rockville Financial and the Peer Group.
Financial Condition
     Table 3.2 shows comparative balance sheet measures for Rockville Financial and the Peer Group, reflecting balances as of June 30, 2010. Rockville Financial’s equity-to-assets ratio of 10.1% was below the Peer Group’s average equity ratio of 11.9%. Tangible equity-to-assets ratios for the Company and the Peer Group equaled 10.1% and 10.8%, respectively. However, with the infusion of the net conversion proceeds, the Company’s equity ratios should exceed the Peer Group average and median ratios. The increase in Rockville Financial’s pro forma capital

 


 

     

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III. 7
Table 3.2
Balance Sheet Composition and Growth Rates
Comparable Institution Analysis
As of June 30, 2010
                                                                                                                                                                         
            Balance Sheet as a Percent of Assets   Balance Sheet Annual Growth Rates   Regulatory Capital
            Cash &   MBS &                           Borrowed   Subd.   Net   Goodwill   Tng Net           MBS, Cash &                   Borrows.   Net   Tng Net            
            Equivalents   Invest   BOLI   Loans   Deposits   Funds   Debt   Worth   & Intang   Worth   Assets   Investments   Loans   Deposits   & Subdebt   Worth   Worth   Tangible   Core   Reg.Cap.
Rockville Financial, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                
June 30, 2010
        1.2 %     9.2 %     0.7 %     86.3 %     71.8 %     17.0 %     0.0 %     10.1 %     0.1 %     10.1 %     4.00 %     1.95 %     3.84 %     3.71 %     5.71 %     8.21 %     8.22 %     10.30 %     10.30 %     14.00 %
 
                                                                                                                                                                       
All Public Companies                                                                                                                                                                
Averages
            5.9 %     20.5 %     1.4 %     67.2 %     72.3 %     14.2 %     0.5 %     11.7 %     0.9 %     10.9 %     4.44 %     14.82 %     1.12 %     8.49 %     -14.36 %     2.36 %     2.14 %     10.93 %     10.87 %     18.26 %
Medians
            4.6 %     18.4 %     1.4 %     68.6 %     73.4 %     12.6 %     0.0 %     10.3 %     0.0 %     9.4 %     2.32 %     7.69 %     -0.76 %     5.64 %     -12.33 %     1.97 %     1.49 %     9.57 %     9.54 %     15.71 %
 
                                                                                                                                                                       
State of CT                                                                                                                                                                
Averages
            4.7 %     21.5 %     1.1 %     66.3 %     69.0 %     15.3 %     0.4 %     13.9 %     3.3 %     10.6 %     3.34 %     7.68 %     1.06 %     5.46 %     -6.55 %     9.78 %     11.10 %     9.86 %     9.86 %     16.17 %
Medians
            5.2 %     21.4 %     1.2 %     68.4 %     71.8 %     17.0 %     0.2 %     10.1 %     1.5 %     10.1 %     3.78 %     4.65 %     0.67 %     5.40 %     -8.54 %     7.54 %     8.12 %     9.86 %     9.86 %     15.30 %
 
                                                                                                                                                                       
Comparable Group                                                                                                                                                                
Averages
            2.8 %     27.3 %     1.6 %     64.5 %     65.2 %     21.3 %     0.6 %     11.9 %     1.1 %     10.8 %     9.36 %     13.20 %     6.13 %     16.17 %     -1.44 %     7.63 %     7.20 %     13.36 %     12.11 %     18.12 %
Medians
            2.6 %     24.3 %     1.5 %     68.4 %     66.2 %     19.9 %     0.0 %     10.2 %     0.5 %     9.5 %     5.09 %     10.31 %     1.18 %     12.85 %     2.04 %     6.29 %     6.29 %     12.52 %     9.44 %     12.69 %
 
                                                                                                                                                                       
Comparable Group                                                                                                                                                                
BFED
  Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY     2.1 %     17.9 %     1.0 %     76.2 %     64.8 %     24.9 %     0.0 %     9.9 %     0.0 %     9.9 %     2.45 %     6.06 %     1.34 %     5.50 %     -4.31 %     9.55 %     9.55 %     8.92 %     8.92 %     12.69 %
BRKL
  Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA     3.3 %     12.9 %     0.0 %     80.5 %     64.0 %     16.5 %     0.0 %     18.6 %     1.7 %     16.9 %     0.69 %     -2.00 %     1.18 %     13.44 %     -30.14 %     1.46 %     1.92 %     15.60 %     15.60 %     NA
DNBK
  Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA     3.9 %     25.3 %     1.3 %     64.7 %     76.4 %     9.8 %     1.2 %     11.6 %     1.3 %     10.3 %     39.94 %     33.50 %     38.96 %     48.67 %     3.92 %     30.54 %     15.60 %     NA     NA     16.70 %
ESBF
  ESB Financial Corp. of PA     1.6 %     57.2 %     1.5 %     34.3 %     51.0 %     36.3 %     2.4 %     8.9 %     2.2 %     6.7 %     -0.80 %     -1.49 %     1.11 %     10.26 %     -14.74 %     13.16 %     18.74 %     NA     NA     NA
ESSA
  ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA     2.6 %     24.9 %     1.5 %     68.4 %     48.3 %     33.9 %     0.0 %     16.6 %     0.0 %     16.6 %     1.35 %     5.90 %     -0.89 %     28.57 %     -20.32 %     -4.57 %     -4.57 %     NA     NA     NA
HARL
  Harleysville Savings Fin. Corp. of PA     1.7 %     35.0 %     1.6 %     59.5 %     60.3 %     32.7 %     0.0 %     6.1 %     0.0 %     6.1 %     5.09 %     1.84 %     6.77 %     15.91 %     -10.24 %     6.29 %     6.29 %     NA     NA     11.73 %
HIFS
  Hingham Institute for Savings of MA     8.4 %     11.2 %     1.4 %     76.6 %     70.2 %     22.2 %     0.0 %     7.1 %     0.0 %     7.1 %     12.74 %     31.47 %     7.53 %     16.50 %     3.37 %     10.42 %     10.42 %     NA     7.10 %     12.61 %
NHTB
  NH Thrift Bancshares of NH     2.6 %     24.3 %     1.0 %     65.6 %     73.4 %     14.0 %     2.1 %     9.3 %     2.9 %     6.4 %     8.87 %     29.17 %     2.58 %     6.64 %     22.22 %     7.21 %     11.86 %     NA     NA     NA
OCFC
  OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ     1.4 %     18.9 %     1.8 %     75.3 %     69.4 %     19.9 %     1.2 %     8.8 %     0.0 %     8.8 %     16.24 %     NM       0.80 %     12.85 %     29.55 %     20.33 %     20.33 %     NA     NA     NA
PBNY
  Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY     1.4 %     31.8 %     1.7 %     56.6 %     66.2 %     17.8 %     0.0 %     14.5 %     5.6 %     8.9 %     4.93 %     15.69 %     -0.62 %     4.70 %     7.92 %     1.98 %     4.04 %     9.44 %     9.44 %     NA
THRD
  TF Financial Corp. of New tow n PA     2.8 %     19.7 %     2.4 %     72.2 %     77.6 %     11.1 %     0.0 %     10.2 %     0.6 %     9.5 %     -0.51 %     8.31 %     -4.14 %     5.33 %     -28.08 %     5.24 %     5.60 %     NA     NA     NA
UBNK
  United Financial Bancorp of MA     3.7 %     20.4 %     1.8 %     70.4 %     71.7 %     12.7 %     0.5 %     14.4 %     0.5 %     13.9 %     24.72 %     17.68 %     26.52 %     35.82 %     2.04 %     4.44 %     0.66 %     NA     NA     NA
WFD
  Westfield Financial Inc. of MA     1.3 %     55.2 %     3.2 %     38.1 %     54.3 %     25.7 %     0.0 %     19.4 %     0.0 %     19.4 %     6.03 %     12.32 %     -1.45 %     6.05 %     20.05 %     -6.90 %     -6.90 %     19.48 %     19.48 %     36.86 %
 
Source:   SNL Financial, LC. and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources w e believe are reliable, but w e cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
 
Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.8
position will be favorable from a risk perspective and in terms of future earnings potential that could be realized through leverage and lower funding costs. At the same time, the Company’s higher pro forma capitalization will initially depress return on equity. Both Rockville Financial’s and the Peer Group’s capital ratios reflected capital surpluses with respect to the regulatory capital requirements. On a pro forma basis, the Company’s regulatory surpluses will become more significant and will exceed the Peer Group’s regulatory capital ratios.
     The interest-earning assets (“IEA”) composition reflects differences in terms of the proportion of loans, as Rockville Financial’s ratio of loans/assets of 86.3% is higher than the Peer Group average ratio of 64.5%. Conversely, Rockville Financial’s level of cash and investments equal to 10.4% of assets was lower than the comparable Peer Group average of 30.1%. The higher ratio of loans reflects the Company’s continued strong loan growth (and related demand) and the Company’s preference for investing in whole loans, as Rockville Financial has limited funds deployed into the investment securities portfolio, primarily to liquidity and balances of short- to intermediate-term investments. The primary objective of focusing on growth of the loan portfolio since completion of the minority stock issuance in 2005 has been to leverage capital and enhance earnings per share. Overall, Rockville’s IEA amounted to 96.7% of assets, which modestly exceeded the Peer Group’s average ratio of 94.6%. Both the Company’s and the Peer Group’s IEA ratios exclude BOLI as an IEA. On a pro forma basis immediately following the Second Step Conversion, a portion of the proceeds will initially be invested into Federal funds or shorter-term investment securities increasing the relative proportion of cash and investments for the Company in comparison to the Peer Group over the short-term. Furthermore, the IEA advantage for the Company will strengthen.
     Rockville Financial’s funding liabilities reflected a funding strategy that was similar to that of the Peer Group’s funding composition. The Company’s deposits equaled 71.8% of assets, which exceeded the Peer Group’s ratio of 65.2%. Comparatively, the Company maintained a slightly lower level of borrowings than the Peer Group, as indicated by borrowings-to-assets ratios of 17.0% and 21.3%, respectively. Total interest-bearing liabilities (“IBL”) maintained by the Company and the Peer Group, as a percent of assets, equaled 88.8% and 86.5%, respectively, with the Peer Group’s lower ratio supported by maintenance of a higher capital position.
     A key measure of balance sheet strength for a thrift institution is its IEA/IBL ratio. Presently, the Company’s IEA/IBL ratio is relatively comparable to the Peer Group’s ratio, based on IEA/IBL ratios of 108.9% and 109.4%, respectively. The additional capital realized from

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.9
stock proceeds should increase the Company’s IEA/IBL ratio as the IBL ratio diminishes with the increased capital.
     The growth rate section of Table 3.2 shows annual growth rates for key balance sheet items. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, Rockville Financial recorded asset growth of 4.0%, which was less than the Peer Group’s asset growth rate of 9.4%. However, the Peer Group’s asset growth was supported by acquisition activity by several thrifts (DNBK and UBNK), which skewed the average upward. The Peer Group’s median asset growth rate was 5.1%, which compared more closely to the Company’s 4.0% growth rate. Accordingly, our analysis focuses on the median growth rate figures for the Peer Group.
     Asset growth for Rockville Financial was sustained through a 2.0% increase in cash and investments and a 3.7% increase in loans, with the Peer Group reporting stronger growth for cash and investments, while loan growth was only 1.2% for the Peer Group. Both the loan growth for the Company and the Peer Group have been impacted by the recession and low interest rates which has limited demand for credit by strong borrowers. This has caused residential mortgage loan demand to be concentrated in longer-term fixed rate loans, which many institutions limit for portfolio investment, owing to interest rate risk considerations.
     Asset growth for Rockville Financial was funded with a 3.7% increase in deposits, which was supplemented by a 5.7% increase in borrowings, while the Peer Group’s asset growth was funded with a higher 12.9% growth in deposits and lower borrowings growth of 2.0%. The Company’s capital increased by 8.2%, during the twelve month period, which exceeded the Peer Group’s capital growth rate of 6.3%. The Company’s post-conversion capital growth rate will initially be constrained by maintenance of a relatively high pro forma capital position.
Income and Expense Components
     Table 3.3 displays statements of operations for the Company and the Peer Group for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. Rockville Financial reported net income equal to 0.74% of average assets, versus net income equal to 0.65% of average assets for the Peer Group. The Company’s higher return was supported by a higher level of net interest income and a lower ratio for loan loss provisions, which was somewhat offset by the Peer Group’s higher ratio for non-interest operating income and lower level of operating expenses, based on the average.
     The Company maintained a higher net interest income to average assets ratios, which was also reflective of the Company’s higher yield-cost spread, which equaled 3.05% versus 3.00% for the Peer Group. The Company maintained a slightly higher yield on interest-earning

 


 

     

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.10
Table 3.3
Income as Percent of Average Assets and Yields, Costs, Spreads
Comparable Institution Analysis
For the 12 Months Ended June 30, 2010
                                                                                                                                                         
            Net Interest Income           Other Income           G&A/Other Exp.   Non-Op. Items   Yields, Costs, and Spreads        
                                    Loss   NII                           Total                                                           MEMO:   MEMO:
    Net                           Provis.   After   Loan   R.E.   Other   Other   G&A   Goodwill   Net   Extrao.   Yield   Cost   Yld-Cost   Assets/   Effective
    Income   Income   Expense   NII   on IEA   Provis.   Fees   Oper.   Income   Income   Expense   Amort.   Gains   Items   On Assets   Of Funds   Spread   FTE Emp.   Tax Rate
Rockville Financial, Inc.
                                                                                                                                                       
June 30, 2010
    0.74 %     4.80 %     1.59 %     3.21 %     0.20 %     3.01 %     0.00 %     -0.03 %     0.40 %     0.37 %     2.32 %     0.00 %     0.07 %     0.00 %     5.02 %     1.97 %     3.05 %   $ 7,416       34.88 %
 
                                                                                                                                                       
All Public Companies
                                                                                                                                                       
Averages
    -0.07 %     4.74 %     1.75 %     3.00 %     0.95 %     2.04 %     0.03 %     -0.07 %     0.77 %     0.73 %     2.78 %     0.05 %     0.03 %     0.01 %     5.07 %     2.00 %     3.06 %   $ 6,014       32.57 %
Medians
    0.27 %     4.80 %     1.75 %     3.04 %     0.53 %     2.37 %     0.00 %     -0.01 %     0.56 %     0.51 %     2.64 %     0.00 %     0.04 %     0.00 %     5.06 %     2.00 %     3.13 %   $ 4,901       32.49 %
 
                                                                                                                                                       
State of CT
                                                                                                                                                       
Averages
    0.22 %     4.43 %     1.61 %     2.82 %     0.21 %     2.61 %     0.00 %     -0.02 %     0.89 %     0.87 %     2.72 %     0.05 %     -0.42 %     0.00 %     4.78 %     1.86 %     2.92 %   $ 5,870       33.95 %
Medians
    0.38 %     4.68 %     1.62 %     2.83 %     0.20 %     2.65 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.79 %     0.71 %     2.46 %     0.04 %     0.01 %     0.00 %     4.93 %     1.98 %     2.87 %   $ 5,062       34.88 %
 
                                                                                                                                                       
Comparable Group
                                                                                                                                                       
Averages
    0.65 %     4.71 %     1.72 %     2.99 %     0.32 %     2.67 %     0.01 %     -0.02 %     0.46 %     0.44 %     2.19 %     0.02 %     0.07 %     0.00 %     4.98 %     1.98 %     3.00 %   $ 7,019       28.01 %
Medians
    0.59 %     4.80 %     1.60 %     3.15 %     0.27 %     2.74 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.47 %     0.45 %     2.46 %     0.00 %     0.07 %     0.00 %     5.04 %     1.90 %     3.24 %   $ 6,799       27.57 %
 
                                                                                                                                                       
Comparable Group
                                                                                                                                                       
BFED      Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY
    0.49 %     5.20 %     2.36 %     2.84 %     0.61 %     2.23 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.47 %     0.47 %     1.85 %     0.00 %     -0.08 %     0.00 %     5.41 %     2.63 %     2.78 %   $ 7,998       36.82 %
BRKL      Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    0.96 %     5.06 %     1.60 %     3.46 %     0.27 %     3.19 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.05 %     0.05 %     1.68 %     0.05 %     0.09 %     0.00 %     5.23 %     1.99 %     3.24 %   $ 11,317       40.40 %
DNBK      Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    0.58 %     4.89 %     1.52 %     3.37 %     0.25 %     3.11 %     0.01 %     -0.04 %     0.48 %     0.45 %     2.89 %     0.07 %     0.07 %     0.00 %     5.18 %     1.75 %     3.43 %   $ 6,799       14.29 %
ESBF      ESB Financial Corp. of PA
    0.66 %     4.54 %     2.42 %     2.12 %     0.05 %     2.07 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.14 %     0.14 %     1.34 %     0.02 %     -0.05 %     0.00 %     4.89 %     2.68 %     2.21 %   $ 7,434       18.90 %
ESSA      ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA
    0.47 %     4.77 %     2.06 %     2.71 %     0.19 %     2.52 %     0.04 %     -0.11 %     0.68 %     0.61 %     2.57 %     0.00 %     0.09 %     0.00 %     4.97 %     2.52 %     2.45 %   $ 5,995       27.57 %
HARL      Harleysville Savings Fin. Corp. of PA
    0.59 %     4.79 %     2.69 %     2.10 %     0.07 %     2.03 %     0.00 %     -0.02 %     0.28 %     0.26 %     1.49 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     4.98 %     2.89 %     2.09 %   $ 9,225       26.01 %
HIFS       Hingham Institute for Savings of MA
    0.99 %     4.94 %     1.75 %     3.18 %     0.15 %     3.03 %     0.00 %     -0.09 %     0.34 %     0.26 %     1.68 %     0.00 %     0.01 %     0.00 %     5.11 %     1.90 %     3.21 %   $ 9,916       39.21 %
NHTB      NH Thrift Bancshares of NH
    0.78 %     4.22 %     1.10 %     3.12 %     0.54 %     2.57 %     0.00 %     0.01 %     0.68 %     0.69 %     2.59 %     0.05 %     0.52 %     0.00 %     4.57 %     1.24 %     3.34 %   $ 4,244       32.04 %
OCFC      OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ
    0.85 %     4.80 %     1.26 %     3.53 %     0.40 %     3.14 %     0.02 %     0.00 %     0.62 %     0.64 %     2.46 %     0.00 %     0.09 %     0.00 %     5.03 %     1.40 %     3.63 %   $ 5,648       35.19 %
PBNY      Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY
    0.69 %     4.12 %     0.97 %     3.15 %     0.42 %     2.74 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.68 %     0.68 %     2.70 %     0.07 %     0.23 %     0.00 %     4.59 %     1.15 %     3.43 %   $ 5,529       24.11 %
THRD      TF Financial Corp. of New town PA
    0.55 %     4.91 %     1.67 %     3.24 %     0.45 %     2.79 %     0.01 %     -0.01 %     0.37 %     0.37 %     2.55 %     0.00 %     0.12 %     0.00 %     5.17 %     1.89 %     3.28 %   $ 4,072       23.67 %
UBNK      United Financial Bancorp of MA
    0.55 %     4.89 %     1.49 %     3.39 %     0.21 %     3.18 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.80 %     0.80 %     2.71 %     0.01 %     -0.20 %     0.00 %     5.16 %     1.78 %     3.37 %   $ 5,722       29.58 %
WFD       Westfield Financial Inc. of MA
    0.34 %     4.13 %     1.50 %     2.63 %     0.56 %     2.07 %     0.00 %     -0.03 %     0.36 %     0.33 %     2.02 %     0.00 %     0.03 %     0.00 %     4.43 %     1.94 %     2.49 %   $ 7,351       16.40 %
 
Source: SNL Financial, LC. and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.11
assets (5.02% versus an average of 4.98% for the Peer Group), and a similar cost of funds (1.98% average for the Peer Group versus 1.97% for the Company). Overall, Rockville Financial and the Peer Group reported net interest income to average assets ratios of 3.21% and 2.99%, respectively.
     In another key area of core earnings strength, the Company maintained a higher level of operating expenses than the Peer Group. For the period covered in Table 3.3, the Company and the Peer Group reported operating expense to average assets ratios of 2.32% and 2.19%, respectively. The Company’s slightly higher operating expense ratio reflects the Company’s recent emphasis on commercial real estate lending and the investment of more resources into that department, including added staff. Additionally, the higher proportion of loans and transaction deposit accounts and emphasis on service and branch expansion, may also be factors leading to the Company’s higher operating expense ratio. At the same time, Rockville Financial’s operating expense ratio is favorable relative to the Peer Group median of 2.46%. However, assets per full time equivalent employee equaled $7.4 million for Rockville Financial versus $7.0 million for the Peer Group.
     When viewed together, net interest income and operating expenses provide considerable insight into a thrift’s earnings strength, since those sources of income and expenses are typically the most prominent components of earnings and are generally more predictable than losses and gains realized from the sale of assets or other non-recurring activities. In this regard, as measured by their expense coverage ratios (net interest income divided by operating expenses), the Peer Group’s and the Company’s earnings were both favorable. Expense coverage ratios posted by Rockville Financial and the Peer Group equaled 1.38x and 1.37x, respectively.
     Sources of non-interest operating income provided a larger contribution to the Peer Group’s earnings than Rockville Financial, with such income amounting to 0.44% and 0.37%, respectively. The Company’s non-interest operating income is supported by revenues generated through service fees, which are generated primarily from its deposit base and portfolio of loans serviced for others. Taking non-interest operating income into account, Rockville Financial’s efficiency ratio (operating expenses, net of amortization of intangibles, as a percent of the sum of non-interest operating income and net interest income) of 64.8% was at a slight advantage to the Peer Group’s efficiency ratio of 63.3%.
     Loan loss provisions had a larger impact on the Peer Group’s earnings than for the Company, with loan loss provisions equaling 0.20% and 0.32% of average assets, respectively.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.12
The lower level of loan provisions established by the Company was supported by its relatively favorable credit quality measures.
     Net gains and losses realized from the sale of assets and other non-operating items equaled a net gain of 0.07% of average assets for the Company, comparable to the Peer Group average. The net gain recorded by the Company was attributable to gains on the sale of loans and investment securities, as well as a minimal OTTI charge on securities. To the extent that gains have been derived through selling fixed rate loans into the secondary market, such gains may be considered to be an ongoing activity for an institution and, therefore, warrant some consideration as a core earnings factor for an institution. However, loan sale gains are still viewed as a more volatile source of income than income generated through the net interest margin and non-interest operating income.
     Taxes had a moderately larger impact on the Company’s earnings than the Peer Group’s earnings, with effective tax rates of 34.88% and 28.01%, respectively. As indicated in the prospectus, the Company’s effective marginal tax rate is equal to 34.0%.
Loan Composition
     Table 3.4 presents data related to the comparative loan portfolio composition (including the investment in MBS). The Company’s loan portfolio composition reflected a similar concentration of 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities as maintained by the Peer Group (52.3% of assets versus 52.0% for the Peer Group). The Company’s ratio was attributable to maintaining higher concentrations of 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans, but lower MBS relative to the Peer Group’s ratios. Loans serviced for others equaled 5.1% and 9.7% of the Company’s and the Peer Group’s assets, respectively, thereby indicating a slightly greater influence of loan servicing income on the Peer Group’s earnings. Both the Company and the Peer Group maintained relatively modest balances of loan servicing intangibles.
     Diversification into higher risk and higher yielding types of lending was more significant for the Company compared to the Peer Group’s lending diversification, largely on the basis of the higher concentration of commercial real estate loans maintained by the Company. Commercial real estate/multi-family loans represented the most significant area of lending diversification for the Company (26.6% of assets), followed by commercial business loans (8.0% of assets). By comparison, the Peer Group’s lending diversification also consisted primarily of commercial real estate/multi-family loans (17.9% of assets), followed by commercial business

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.13
Table 3.4
Loan Portfolio Composition and Related Information
Comparable Institution Analysis
As of June 30, 2010
                                                                         
    Portfolio Composition as a Percent of Assets            
            1-4   Constr.   5+Unit   Commerc.           RWA/   Serviced   Servicing
Institution   MBS   Family   & Land   Comm RE   Business   Consumer   Assets   For Others   Assets
    (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   ($000)   ($000)
Rockville Financial, Inc.
    5.13 %     47.12 %     4.44 %     26.59 %     7.97 %     0.44 %     78.36 %   $ 81,400     $ 576  
 
                                                                       
All Public Companies
                                                                       
Averages
    11.93 %     34.49 %     4.61 %     22.07 %     4.63 %     2.17 %     64.70 %   $ 636,079     $ 5,351  
Medians
    10.03 %     35.18 %     3.29 %     21.41 %     3.52 %     0.50 %     63.96 %   $ 45,215     $ 202  
 
                                                                       
State of CT
                                                                       
Averages
    13.85 %     36.40 %     2.89 %     19.01 %     7.99 %     0.47 %     63.97 %   $ 148,322     $ 621  
Medians
    12.69 %     37.60 %     3.28 %     22.03 %     4.85 %     0.39 %     62.11 %   $ 134,430     $ 576  
 
                                                                       
Comparable Group
                                                                       
Averages
    17.40 %     34.58 %     2.69 %     17.90 %     6.10 %     3.47 %     62.59 %   $ 155,154     $ 883  
Medians
    16.21 %     35.63 %     2.20 %     16.63 %     7.01 %     0.37 %     60.48 %   $ 84,650     $ 397  
 
                                                                       
Comparable Group
                                                                       
BFED      Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY
    15.23 %     35.63 %     2.20 %     14.21 %     9.53 %     16.21 %     76.62 %   $ 134,540     $ 855  
BRKL      Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    5.06 %     13.90 %     0.57 %     34.57 %     11.45 %     21.19 %     81.93 %   $ 34,980     $ 137  
DNBK      Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    11.19 %     16.59 %     4.21 %     24.93 %     14.72 %     0.15 %     70.49 %   $ 112,390     $ 397  
ESBF      ESB Financial Corp. of PA
    38.81 %     20.55 %     2.36 %     5.93 %     0.90 %     3.47 %     51.18 %   $ 8,340     $ 23  
ESSA      ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA
    16.82 %     60.97 %     0.73 %     4.94 %     2.26 %     0.18 %     46.37 %   $ 45,570     $ 336  
HARL      Harleysville Savings Fin. Corp. of PA
    16.63 %     50.19 %     1.26 %     6.11 %     1.99 %     0.13 %     54.00 %   $ 1,940     $ 0  
HIFS       Hingham Institute for Savings of MA
    0.03 %     42.71 %     2.86 %     31.59 %     0.03 %     0.07 %     61.26 %   $ 23,770     $ 0  
NHTB      NH Thrift Bancshares of NH
    17.83 %     41.80 %     2.05 %     14.70 %     7.01 %     0.94 %     60.48 %   $ 356,250     $ 1,751  
OCFC      OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ
    16.22 %     53.64 %     1.99 %     16.61 %     3.50 %     0.03 %     58.88 %   $ 933,650     $ 5,794  
PBNY      Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY
    12.17 %     22.11 %     7.76 %     19.12 %     8.19 %     0.45 %     64.05 %   $ 172,000     $ 1,089  
THRD      TF Financial Corp. of New town PA
    11.40 %     48.85 %     4.88 %     17.97 %     0.84 %     0.37 %     58.03 %   $ 98,600     $ 597  
UBNK      United Financial Bancorp of MA
    17.36 %     33.35 %     3.28 %     25.35 %     7.33 %     1.70 %     75.93 %   $ 84,650     $ 500  
WFD       Westfield Financial Inc. of MA
    47.39 %     9.31 %     0.80 %     16.63 %     11.58 %     0.25 %     54.47 %   $ 10,320     $ 0  
 
Source:   SNL Financial LC. and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.
loans (6.1% of assets). Construction/land loans and consumer loans equaled 4.4% and 0.4% of the Company’s assets, respectively, which was higher compared to the Peer Group’s average ratios of 2.7% for construction/land loans and lower compared to 3.5% for consumer loans. Revealing the Company’s more significant lending diversification into higher risk types of loans, as well as the higher proportion of loans in IEA, the Company’s risk weighted assets-to-assets ratio was higher than the Peer Group’s ratio (78.36% versus 62.59% for the Peer Group).

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.14
Interest Rate Risk
     Table 3.5 reflects various key ratios highlighting the relative interest rate risk exposure of the Company versus the Peer Group on a pre-Offering basis. In terms of balance sheet composition, Rockville Financial’s interest rate risk characteristics were considered to be similar to the comparable measures for the Peer Group. Most notably, the Company’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio and IEA/IBL ratio were similar to the comparable Peer Group ratios. However, the Company’s level of non-interest earning assets was below the Peer Group’s ratio. On a pro forma basis, the infusion of stock proceeds should serve to provide the Company with comparative advantages over the Peer Group’s balance sheet interest rate risk characteristics, with respect to the increases that will be realized in the Company’s equity-to-assets and IEA/IBL ratios.
Table 3.5
Interest Rate Risk Measures and Net Interest Income Volatility
Comparable Institution Analysis
As of June 30, 2010 or Most Recent Date Available
                                                                         
    Balance Sheet Measures    
                    Non-Earn.   Quarterly Change in Net Interest Income
    Equity/   IEA/   Assets/                        
Institution   Assets   IBL   Assets   6/30/2010   3/31/2010   12/31/2009   9/30/2009   6/30/2009   3/31/2009
    (%)   (%)   (%)   (change in net interest income is annualized in basis points)                
Rockville Financial, Inc.
    10.1 %     108.9 %     3.3 %     -9       25       26       0       0       -10  
 
                                                                       
All Public Companies
    10.9 %     107.8 %     6.4 %     1       5       6       8       0       -1  
State of CT
    10.6 %     109.5 %     7.5 %     5       16       -1       4       0       -9  
 
                                                                       
Comparable Group
                                                                       
Averages
    10.8 %     108.8 %     5.4 %     -1       4       8       6       2       -1  
Medians
    9.5 %     107.0 %     5.4 %     1       5       5       9       6       0  
 
                                                                       
Comparable Group
                                                                       
BFED Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY
    9.9 %     107.1 %     3.9 %     -1       4       14       5       5       10  
BRKL Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    16.9 %     120.1 %     3.2 %     6       8       14       -2       40       -16  
DNBK Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    10.3 %     107.4 %     6.1 %     4       -14       44       12       6       -6  
ESBF ESB Financial Corp. of PA
    6.7 %     103.8 %     6.9 %     1       12       11       10       10       6  
ESSA ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA
    16.6 %     116.5 %     4.1 %     -24       -5       0       -2       6       6  
HARL Harleysville Savings Fin. Corp. of PA
    6.1 %     103.4 %     3.8 %     3       5       13       9       -25       10  
HIFS Hingham Institute for Savings of MA
    7.1 %     104.1 %     3.8 %     2       1       -7       7       18       0  
NHTB NH Thrift Bancshares of NH
    6.4 %     103.3 %     7.5 %     -4       9       5       10       -12       -25  
OCFC OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ
    8.8 %     105.6 %     4.4 %     -2       12       -6       15       6       12  
PBNY Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY
    8.9 %     107.0 %     10.1 %     15       5       1       -7       -7       -21  
THRD TF Financial Corp. of New town PA
    9.5 %     106.7 %     5.4 %     2       2       5       12       6       14  
UBNK United Financial Bancorp of MA
    13.9 %     111.4 %     5.4 %     -6       29       4       13       -17       -3  
WFD Westfield Financial Inc. of MA
    19.4 %     118.3 %     5.4 %     -13       -18       4       -1       -14       -1  
 
NA=Change is greater than 100 basis points during the quarter.
Source:   SNL Financial LC. and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but w e cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.15
     To analyze interest rate risk associated with the net interest margin, we reviewed quarterly changes in net interest income as a percent of average assets for Rockville Financial and the Peer Group. In general, the more significant fluctuations in the Company’s ratios implied that the interest rate risk associated with the Company’s net interest income was greater in comparison to the Peer Group, based on the interest rate environment that prevailed during the period covered in Table 3.5. The stability of the Company’s net interest margin should be enhanced by the infusion of stock proceeds, as interest rate sensitive liabilities will be funding a lower portion of Rockville Financial’s assets and the proceeds will be substantially deployed into interest-earning assets.
Credit Risk
     Overall, based on a comparison of credit quality measures, the Company’s credit risk exposure was considered to be relatively similar to the Peer Group’s, though the reserve coverage rations are lower. As shown in Table 3.6, the Company’s non-performing assets/assets and non-performing loans/loans ratios equaled 1.08% and 1.03%, respectively, versus comparable measures of 0.96% and 1.29% for the Peer Group. The Company’s and Peer Group’s loss reserves as a percent of non-performing loans equaled 91.49% and 134.38%, respectively. Loss reserves maintained as a percent of net loans receivable equaled 0.94% and 1.23% for the Company and the Peer Group, respectively. Net loan charge-offs as a percent of loans were lower for the Company and the Peer Group, as net loan charge-offs as a percentage of loans for the Company equaled 0.17% of loans versus 0.41% of loans for the Peer Group.
Summary
     Based on the above analysis and the criteria employed in the selection of the companies for the Peer Group, RP Financial concluded that the Peer Group forms a reasonable basis for determining the pro forma market value of Rockville Financial. In those areas where notable differences exist, we will apply appropriate valuation adjustments in the next section.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   PEER GROUP ANALYSIS
III.16
Table 3.6
Credit Risk Measures and Related Information
Comparable Institution Analysis
As of June 30, 2010 or Most Recent Date Available
                                                                 
            NPAs &                           Rsrves/        
    REO/   90+Del/   NPLs/   Rsrves/   Rsrves/   NPAs &   Net Loan   NLCs/
Institution   Assets   Assets   Loans   Loans   NPLs   90+Del   Chargoffs   Loans
    (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   ($000)   (%)
Rockville Financial, Inc.
    0.18 %     1.08 %     1.03 %     0.94 %     91.49 %     75.89 %   $ 2,414 (1)     0.17 %
 
                                                               
All Public Companies
                                                               
Averages
    0.51 %     4.25 %     4.92 %     1.69 %     65.87 %     52.38 %   $ 1,552       0.72 %
Medians
    0.20 %     2.56 %     3.33 %     1.39 %     45.65 %     40.24 %   $ 642       0.32 %
 
                                                               
State of CT
                                                               
Averages
    0.19 %     1.56 %     1.43 %     0.98 %     68.55 %     50.40 %   $ 1,532       0.23 %
Medians
    0.20 %     1.08 %     1.12 %     0.94 %     71.31 %     56.81 %   $ 675       0.11 %
 
                                                               
Comparable Group
                                                               
Averages
    0.13 %     0.96 %     1.29 %     1.23 %     134.38 %     128.42 %   $ 779       0.41 %
Medians
    0.07 %     0.93 %     1.24 %     1.02 %     105.74 %     90.54 %   $ 565       0.14 %
 
                                                               
Comparable Group
                                                               
BFED      Beacon Federal Bancorp of NY
    0.07 %     1.56 %     1.79 %     2.17 %     121.24 %     107.87 %   $ 580       0.28 %
BRKL      Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    0.03 %     0.61 %     0.56 %     1.41 %     253.47 %     187.53 %   $ 874       0.16 %
DNBK      Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA
    0.04 %     0.81 %     1.17 %     0.98 %     83.76 %     79.58 %   $ 565       0.14 %
ESBF      ESB Financial Corp. of PA
    0.03 %     0.30 %     0.76 %     0.93 %     121.59 %     107.90 %   $ 77       0.05 %
ESSA      ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA
    0.20 %     1.05 %     1.61 %     0.95 %     59.10 %     63.83 %   $ 73       0.04 %
HARL      Harleysville Savings Fin. Corp. of PA
    0.00 %     0.06 %     0.11 %     0.47 %     441.49 %     441.49 %   $ 43       0.03 %
HIFS     Hingham Institute for Savings of MA
    0.76 %     1.57 %     1.05 %     0.86 %     81.26 %     42.00 %   $ 1       0.00 %
NHTB      NH Thrift Bancshares of NH
    0.03 %     0.37 %     1.05 %     1.52 %     130.20 %     244.32 %   $ 852       0.52 %
OCFC      OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ
    0.12 %   NA   NA     1.02 %   NA   NA   $ 686       0.17 %
PBNY      Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY
    0.11 %     1.11 %     1.31 %     1.82 %     138.49 %     94.66 %   $ 2,173       0.52 %
THRD      TF Financial Corp. of New town PA
    0.20 %     2.21 %     3.04 %     1.28 %     32.98 %     32.98 %   $ 16       0.01 %
UBNK      United Financial Bancorp of MA
    0.13 %     1.20 %     1.51 %     0.89 %     58.79 %     52.43 %   $ 338       0.12 %
WFD       Westfield Financial Inc. of MA
    0.03 %     0.63 %     1.56 %     1.64 %     90.24 %     86.42 %   $ 3,844       3.26 %
 
(1)   Annualized for six months ended June 30, 2010.
Source:   Audited and unaudited financial statements, corporate reports and offering circulars, and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but w e cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.1
IV. VALUATION ANALYSIS
Introduction
     This chapter presents the valuation analysis and methodology, prepared pursuant to the regulatory valuation guidelines, and valuation adjustments and assumptions used to determine the estimated pro forma market value of the common stock to be issued in conjunction with the Company’s conversion transaction.
Appraisal Guidelines
     The OTS written appraisal guidelines, which have been adopted in practice by the FDIC, the Department, and the Federal Reserve Board, specifies the market value methodology for estimating the pro forma market value of an institution pursuant to a mutual-to-stock conversion. Pursuant to this methodology: (1) a peer group of comparable publicly-traded institutions is selected; (2) a financial and operational comparison of the subject company to the peer group is conducted to discern key differences; and (3) a valuation analysis in which the pro forma market value of the subject company is determined based on the market pricing of the peer group as of the date of valuation, incorporating valuation adjustments for key differences. In addition, the pricing characteristics of recent conversions, both at conversion and in the aftermarket, must be considered.
RP Financial Approach to the Valuation
     The valuation analysis herein complies with such regulatory approval guidelines. Accordingly, the valuation incorporates a detailed analysis based on the Peer Group, discussed in Chapter III, which constitutes “fundamental analysis” techniques. Additionally, the valuation incorporates a “technical analysis” of recently completed stock conversions, including closing pricing and aftermarket trading of such offerings. It should be noted that these valuation analyses cannot possibly fully account for all the market forces which impact trading activity and pricing characteristics of a particular stock on a given day.
     The pro forma market value determined herein is a preliminary value for the Company’s to-be-issued stock. Throughout the conversion process, RP Financial will: (1) review changes in Rockville Financial’s operations and financial condition; (2) monitor Rockville Financial’s operations and financial condition relative to the Peer Group to identify any fundamental changes; (3) monitor the external factors affecting value including, but not limited to, local and

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.2
national economic conditions, interest rates, and the stock market environment, including the market for thrift stocks and Rockville Financial’s stock specifically; and (4) monitor pending conversion offerings (including those in the offering phase), both regionally and nationally. If material changes should occur during the conversion process, RP Financial will evaluate if updated valuation reports should be prepared reflecting such changes and their related impact on value, if any. RP Financial will also prepare a final valuation update at the closing of the offering to determine if the prepared valuation analysis and resulting range of value continues to be appropriate.
     The appraised value determined herein is based on the current market and operating environment for the Company and for all thrifts. Subsequent changes in the local and national economy, the legislative and regulatory environment, the stock market, interest rates, and other external forces (such as natural disasters or major world events), which may occur from time to time (often with great unpredictability) may materially impact the market value of all thrift stocks, including Rockville Financial’s value, or Rockville Financial’s value alone. To the extent a change in factors impacting the Company’s value can be reasonably anticipated and/or quantified, RP Financial has incorporated the estimated impact into the analysis.
Valuation Analysis
     A fundamental analysis discussing similarities and differences relative to the Peer Group was presented in Chapter III. The following sections summarize the key differences between the Company and the Peer Group and how those differences affect the pro forma valuation. Emphasis is placed on the specific strengths and weaknesses of the Company relative to the Peer Group in such key areas as financial condition, profitability, growth and viability of earnings, asset growth, primary market area, dividends, liquidity of the shares, marketing of the issue, management, and the effect of government regulations and/or regulatory reform. We have also considered the market for thrift stocks, in particular new issues, to assess the impact on value of the Company coming to market at this time.
1. Financial Condition
     The financial condition of an institution is an important determinant in pro forma market value because investors typically look to such factors as liquidity, capital, asset composition and quality, and funding sources in assessing investment attractiveness. The similarities and differences in the Company’s and the Peer Group’s financial strengths are noted as follows:

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.3
  §   Overall A/L Composition . In comparison to the Peer Group, the Company’s IEA composition showed a moderately higher concentration of loans and a lower concentration of cash and investments. Lending diversification into higher risk and higher yielding types of loans was more significant for the Company, which is shown in the higher risk weighted assets-to-assets ratio in comparison to the Peer Group’s ratio. Overall, in comparison to the Peer Group, the Company’s IEA composition provided for a similar yield earned on IEA. The Company’s IBL cost was also similar to the Peer Group’s cost of funds, even though the Company maintained a higher level of deposits and a lower level of borrowings. Overall, as a percent of assets, the Company maintained a broadly similar level of IEA and IBL compared to the Peer Group’s ratios, which resulted in a similar IEA/IBL ratio for the Company. After factoring in the impact of the net stock proceeds, the Company’s IEA/IBL ratio should exceed the Peer Group’s ratio. On balance, RP Financial concluded that asset/liability composition was a favorable factor in our adjustment for financial condition.
 
  §   Credit Quality. The Company’s ratio for non-performing assets was slightly higher than the Peer Group, while non-performing loans were more favorable than the comparable Peer Group ratio. Loss reserves as a percent of non-performing loans were lower for the Company and the Peer Group also maintained higher loss reserves as a percent of loans. Net loan charge-offs were a comparable factor for the Company and the Peer Group. As noted above, the Company’s risk weighted assets-to-assets ratio was higher than the Peer Group’s ratio. Overall, RP Financial concluded that credit quality was a slightly negative factor in our adjustment for financial condition.
 
  §   Balance Sheet Liquidity . The Company operated with a lower level of cash and investment securities relative to the Peer Group. Following the infusion of stock proceeds, the Company’s cash and investments ratio is expected to increase as the proceeds retained at the holding company level will be initially deployed into investments. The Company’s future borrowing capacity was considered to be slightly greater than the Peer Group’s, given the lower level of borrowings currently funding the Company’s assets. Overall, RP Financial concludes that pro forma balance sheet liquidity was a neutral factor in our adjustment for financial condition.
 
  §   Funding Liabilities . The Company’s IBL composition reflected a higher concentration of deposits and a lower concentration of borrowings relative to the comparable Peer Group ratios, which provided for a slightly lower cost of funds for the Company than the Peer Group. Total IBL as a percent of assets were slightly lower for the Company compared to the Peer Group’s ratio, which was attributable to Rockville Financial’s lower equity position. Following the stock offering, the increase in the Company’s capital position will reduce the level of IBL funding the Company’s assets to a ratio that is comparable to or lower than the Peer Group’s ratio. Overall, RP Financial concluded that funding liabilities were a neutral factor in our adjustment for financial condition.
 
  §   Tangible Equity . The Company currently operates with a lower tangible equity-to-assets ratio than the Peer Group. However, following the stock offering, Rockville Financial’s pro forma tangible equity position is expected to exceed the Peer Group, which will result in greater leverage potential. At the same time, the Company’s more significant capital surplus will likely result in a lower ROE. On balance, RP Financial concluded that capital strength was a slightly positive factor in our adjustment for financial condition.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.4
     On balance, Rockville Financial’s balance sheet strength was considered to be more favorable than the Peer Group’s and, thus, a slight upward adjustment was applied for the Company’s financial condition.
2. Profitability, Growth and Viability of Earnings
     Earnings are a key factor in determining pro forma market value, as the level and risk characteristics of a financial institution’s earnings stream and the prospects and ability to generate future earnings heavily influence the multiple that the investment community will pay for earnings. The major factors considered in the valuation are described below.
  §   Reported Profitability . The Company reported higher profitability than the Peer Group. The Company’s higher return was attributable to a higher level of net interest income and lower level of loan loss provisions, which was partially offset by the Company’s lower level of non-interest operating income and higher level of operating expenses based on the Peer Group averages. Reinvestment into IEA and leveraging of the pro forma equity position will serve to increase the Company’s earnings, with the benefit of reinvesting proceeds expected to be somewhat offset by implementation of additional stock benefit plans in connection with the second-step offering. On balance, RP Financial concluded that the Company’s reported earnings were a positive factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
 
  §   Core Profitability . Net interest income, operating expenses, non-interest operating income and loan loss provisions were reviewed in assessing the relative strengths and weaknesses of core profitability. The Company operated with a higher net interest income ratio, a higher operating expense ratio and a lower level of non-interest operating income, based on the Peer Group averages. The Company’s ratios for net interest income and operating expenses translated into a similar expense coverage ratio in comparison to the Peer Group’s ratio, but the Company had a slight efficiency ratio disadvantage. Loan loss provisions had a larger impact on the Peer Group’s earnings. Overall, these measures, as well as the expected earnings benefits the Company should realize from the redeployment of stock proceeds into IEA and leveraging of post-conversion capital, which will be somewhat negated by expenses associated with the stock benefit plans, as well as incremental costs associated with the growth oriented business plan, indicate that the Company’s pro forma core profitability will be more favorable than the Peer Group average. Therefore, RP Financial concluded that this was a slightly positive factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
 
  §   Interest Rate Risk . Quarterly changes in the net interest income ratio for the Company indicated a higher degree of volatility. Other measures of interest rate risk, such as capital and IEA/IBL ratios were similar to the Peer Group. On a pro forma basis, the infusion of stock proceeds can be expected to provide the Company with equity-to-assets and IEA/IBL ratios that will be comparable to or exceed the Peer Group ratios, as well as enhance the stability of the Company’s net interest margin through the reinvestment of stock proceeds into IEA. On balance, RP Financial

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.5
      concluded that interest rate risk was a neutral factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
 
  §   Credit Risk . Loan loss provisions were a larger factor in the Peer Group’s profitability. In terms of future exposure to credit quality related losses, the Company maintained a higher concentration of assets in loans and lending diversification into higher credit risk loans. NPAs to assets were higher and NPLs were lower for the Company compared to the Peer Group. Loss reserves were less favorable for the Company, both with respect to total loans and reserves to NPLs. Net loan charge-offs as a percent of loans were higher for the Peer Group. Overall, RP Financial concluded that credit risk was a slightly negative factor in the adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
 
  §   Earnings Growth Potential . Both, the Company and the Peer Group maintained similar interest rate spreads, but the Company’s net interest income has been slightly more volatile. The infusion of stock proceeds will provide the Company with greater leverage potential, and historical growth has been similar to the Peer Group based on the median. The Company’s higher operating expense ratio will come under pressure with the additional stock benefit plans expense. Overall, no adjustment was warranted for earnings growth for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
 
  §   Return on Equity . While, the Company’s core ROE is slightly higher than the Peer Group’s core ROE, on a pro forma basis, the Company’s earnings increase will be limited whereas the equity will increase considerably, thus resulting in a less favorable pro forma ROE relative to the Peer Group. Accordingly, this was a slightly negative factor in the adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
     On balance, Rockville Financial’s pro forma earnings strength was considered to be more favorable than the Peer Group’s and, thus, a slight upward adjustment was applied for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.
3. Asset Growth
     The Peer Group’s asset growth rate was similar to the Company’s growth rate during the period covered in our comparative analysis, based on the median. On a pro forma basis, the Company’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio will exceed the Peer Group’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio, indicating greater leverage capacity for the Company. On balance, no adjustment was applied for asset growth.
4. Primary Market Area
     The general condition of an institution’s market area has an impact on value, as future success is in part dependent upon opportunities for profitable activities in the local market served. Rockville Financial’s primary market area for loans and deposits is considered to be north-central Connecticut, where the Company maintains its branch network. At the same time,

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.6
the Company faces significant competition for loans and deposits from larger financial institutions, which provide a broader array of services and have significantly larger branch networks. A number of the Peer Group companies on average operate in reasonably similar markets.
     Demographic and economic trends and characteristics in the Company’s primary market area are comparable to the primary market areas served by the Peer Group companies (see Exhibit III-4). In this regard, the total population of the three county market area, on average, is comparable to the average of the Peer Group’s primary markets, however, individually, New London and Tolland Counties populations are below the Peer Group averages, while Hartford County was nearly double the average of the Peer Group. The 2000-2010 growth rates for Hartford and New London Counties fall below the Peer Group markets’ average, while Tolland County was much higher. Income levels in the Company’s market are higher than the Peer Group, but the deposit market share exhibited by the Company in Hartford and New London Counties were below the Peer Group average and median. The Company held a large percentage of deposits in Tolland County, in comparison to the Peer Group average and median. Unemployment rates for the markets served by the Peer Group companies were comparable to the unemployment rates exhibited by Hartford, New London, and Tolland Counties.
     On balance, we concluded that no adjustment was appropriate for the Company’s market area.
5. Dividends
     The Company currently pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Rockville Financial has indicated its intention to continue to pay a quarter dividend of $0.06 per share or $0.24 per share annually, adjusted for the indicated exchange ratio. However, future declarations of dividends by the Board of Directors will depend upon a number of factors, including investment opportunities, growth objectives, financial condition, profitability, tax considerations, minimum capital requirements, regulatory limitations, stock market characteristics and general economic conditions.
     All thirteen of the Peer Group companies pay regular cash dividends, with implied dividend yields ranging from 0.53% to 5.20%. The average dividend yield on the stocks of the Peer Group institutions was 3.09% as of August 26, 2010, representing an average payout ratio of 43.53% of core earnings. As of August 26, 2010, approximately 63% of all fully-converted

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.7
publicly-traded thrifts had adopted cash dividend policies (see Exhibit IV-1), exhibiting an average yield of 2.03%. The dividend paying thrifts generally maintain higher than average profitability ratios, facilitating their ability to pay cash dividends.
     The Company’s indicated dividend policy provides for a lower yield compared to the Peer Group’s average dividend yield. At the same time, the Company will have the capacity to pay a dividend comparable to the Peer Group’s average dividend yield based on pro forma earnings and capitalization. On balance, we concluded that no adjustment was warranted for this factor.
6. Liquidity of the Shares
     The Peer Group is by definition composed of companies that are traded in the public markets. All thirteen of the Peer Group members trade on NASDAQ. Typically, the number of shares outstanding and market capitalization provides an indication of how much liquidity there will be in a particular stock. The market capitalization of the Peer Group companies ranged from $56.5 million to $543.2 million as of August 26, 2010, with average and median market values of $188.8 million and $154.8 million, respectively. The shares issued and outstanding to the public shareholders of the Peer Group members ranged from 2.1 million to 59.0 million, with average and median shares outstanding of 13.3 million and 13.5 million, respectively. The Company’s second-step stock offering is expected to provide for a pro forma market value and shares outstanding that will be generally in the upper end of the ranges of market values and shares outstanding indicated for Peer Group companies. Like all of the Peer Group companies, the Company’s stock will continue to be quoted on NASDAQ following the second-step stock offering. Overall, we anticipate that the Company’s public stock will have a comparable trading market as the Peer Group companies on average and, therefore, concluded no adjustment was necessary for this factor.
7. Marketing of the Issue
     We believe that four separate markets exist for thrift stocks, including those coming to market such as Rockville Financial’s: (A) the after-market for public companies, in which trading activity is regular and investment decisions are made based upon financial condition, earnings, capital, ROE, dividends and future prospects; (B) the new issue market in which converting thrifts are evaluated on the basis of the same factors, but on a pro forma basis without the benefit of prior operations as a fully-converted publicly-held company and stock trading history; (C) the acquisition market for thrift franchises in Connecticut; and (D) the market for the public

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.8
stock of Rockville Financial. All of these markets were considered in the valuation of the Company’s to-be-issued stock.
     A.  The Public Market
     The value of publicly-traded thrift stocks is easily measurable, and is tracked by most investment houses and related organizations. Exhibit IV-1 provides pricing and financial data on all publicly-traded thrifts. In general, thrift stock values react to market stimuli such as interest rates, inflation, perceived industry health, projected rates of economic growth, regulatory issues and stock market conditions in general. Exhibit IV-2 displays historical stock market trends for various indices and includes historical stock price index values for thrifts and commercial banks. Exhibit IV-3 displays historical stock price indices for thrifts only.
     In terms of assessing general stock market conditions, the performance of the overall stock market has been mixed in recent quarters. Stocks started the fourth quarter of 2009 with a sell-off, as investors reacted negatively to economic data showing a slow down in manufacturing activity from August to September and more job losses than expected for September. Energy and material stocks led a stock market rally heading into mid-October, as stock markets rallied around the world. Good earnings reports from J.P. Morgan Chase and Intel pushed the Dow Jones industrial Average (“DJIA”) above a 10000 close in mid-October. Mixed economic data and concerns of the sustainability of the recovery following the removal of the federal stimulus programs provided for volatile trading at the close of October. Stocks moved higher in early-November, with the DJIA topping 10000 again on renewed optimism about the economy aided by a report that manufacturing activity rose around the world in October. Expectations that interest rates and inflation would remain low, following a weaker than expected employment report for October, sustained the rally heading into mid-November. The DJIA hit new highs for the year in mid-November, as investors focused on upbeat earnings from major retailers, signs of economic growth in Asia and the Federal Reserve’s commitment to low interest rates. Stocks traded unevenly through the second half of November, reflecting investor uncertainty over the strength of the economic recovery and Dubai debt worries. Easing fears about the Dubai debt crisis, along with a favorable employment report for November, served to bolster stocks at the end of November and into early-December. Mixed economic data, including a better-than-expected increase in November retail sales and November wholesale inflation rising more than expected, sustained a narrow trading range for the broader stock market heading into mid-December. Worries about the state of European economies and the dollar’s surge upended stocks in mid-December. Helped by some positive economic data

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.9
and acquisition deals in mining and health care, the DJIA posted gains for six consecutive sessions in late-December. Overall, the DJIA closed up 18.8% for 2009, which was 26.4% below its all time high.
     Stocks started 2010 in positive territory on mounting evidence of a global manufacturing rebound, while mixed earnings reports provided for an up and down market in mid-January. The DJIA moved into negative territory for the year heading in into late-January, with financial stocks leading the market lower as the White House proposed new limits on the size and activities of big banks. Technology stocks led the broader market lower at the close of January, as disappointing economic reports dampened growth prospects for 2010. Concerns about the global economy and European default worries pressured stocks lower in early-February, as the DJIA closed below 10000 for the first time in three months. Upbeat corporate earnings and some favorable economic news out of Europe and China held stocks to rebound in mid-February. The positive trend in the broader stock market continued into the second half of February, as investors seized on mild inflation data and more signs that the U.S. economy was recovering. Weak economic data pulled stocks lower at the end of February, although the 2.6% increase in the DJIA for the month of February was its strongest showing since November.
     The DJIA moved back into positive territory for 2010 in early-March, as the broader market rallied on a better-than-expected employment report for February. Stocks trended higher through mid-March, with the DJIA closing up for eight consecutive trading sessions. Factors contributing to the eight day winning streak included bullish comments by Citigroup, expectations of continued low borrowing costs following the Federal Reserve’s mid-March meeting that concluded with keeping its target rate near zero and a brightening manufacturing outlook. Following a one day pull back, the positive trend in the broader market continued heading into late-March. Gains in the health-care sector following the passage of health-care legislation, better-than-expected existing home sales in February, first time jobless claims falling more than expected and solid earnings posted by Best Buy all contributed to the positive trend in stocks. The DJIA moved to a 19-month high approaching the end of the first quarter, as oil stocks led the market higher in response to new evidence of global economic strength. Overall, the DJIA completed its best first quarter since 1999, with a 4.1% increase for the quarter.
     More signs of the economy gaining strength sustained the positive trend in the broader stock market at the start of the second quarter of 2010. The DJIA closed above 11000 heading into mid-April, based on growing optimism about corporate earnings and a recovering economy. Fraud charges against Goldman Sachs halted a six day rally in the market in mid-April, as

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.10
financial stocks led a one day sell-off in the broader market. The broader stock market generally sustained a positive trend during the second half of April, with encouraging first quarter earnings reports and favorable economic data supporting the gains. Financial stocks pulled the broader stock market lower at the end of April on news of a criminal investigation of Goldman Sachs. The sell-off in the stock market sharpened during the first week of May, largely on the basis of heightened concerns about possible ripple effects stemming from Greece’s credit crisis. Stocks surged after European Union leaders agreed to a massive bailout to prevent Greece’s financial troubles from spreading throughout the region, but then reversed course heading into the second half of May on continued worries about the fallout from Europe’s credit crisis and an unexpected increase in U.S. jobless claims. China’s promise not to unload its European debt sparked a one-day rally in late-May, which was followed by a lower close for the DJIA on the last trading day of May as a downgrade of Spain’s credit rekindled investors’ fears about Europe’s economy. Overall, it was the worst May for the DJIA since 1940. Volatility in the broader stock market continued to prevail in early-June. A rebound in energy shares provided for the third biggest daily gain in the DJIA for 2010, which was followed by a one day decline of over 300 points in the DJIA as weaker than expected employment numbers for May sent the DJIA to a close below 10000. The DJIA rallied back over 10000 in mid-June, as stocks were boosted by upbeat comments from the European Central Bank, a rebound in energy stocks, tame inflation data and some regained confidence in the global economic recovery. Weak housing data for May and persistent worries about the global economy pulled stocks lower in late-June. The DJIA closed out the second quarter of 2010 at a new low for the year, reflecting a decline of 10% for the second quarter.
     A disappointing employment report for June 2010 extended the selling during the first week of July. Following seven consecutive days of closing lower, the DJIA posted a gain as bargain hunters entered the market. Some strong earnings reports at the start of second quarter earnings season and upbeat data on jobs supported a seven day winning streak in the broader stock market and pushed the DJIA through the 10000 mark going into mid-July. Renewed concerns about the economy snapped the seven day winning streak in the DJIA, although losses in the broader stock market were pared on news that Goldman Sachs reached a settlement with the SEC. Stocks slumped heading into the second half of July, as Bank of America and Citigroup reported disappointing second quarter earnings and an early-July consumer confidence report showed that consumers were becoming more pessimistic. Favorable second quarter earnings supported a rally in the broader stock market in late-July,

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.11
with the DJIA moving back into positive territory for the year. Overall, the DJIA was up 7.1% for the month of July, which was its strongest performance in a year.
     Better-than-expected economic data helped to sustain the stock market rally at the beginning of August 2010, but stocks eased lower following the disappointing employment report for July. The downturn in the broader stock market accelerated in the second half of August, as a number of economic reports for July showed the economy was losing momentum which more than overshadowed a pick-up in merger activity. On August 26, 2010, the DJIA closed at 9985.81, an increase of 4.2% from one year ago and a decrease of 4.2% year-to-date and the NASDAQ closed at 2118.69, an increase of 4.5% from one year ago and a decrease of 6.6% year-to-date. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index closed at 1047.22 on August 26, 2010, an increase of 1.6% from one year ago and a decrease of 6.1% year-to-date.
     The market for thrift stocks has been somewhat uneven in recent quarters, but in general has underperformed the broader stock market. Some disappointing economic data pushed thrift stocks along with the broader market lower at the beginning of fourth quarter of 2009. Thrift stocks rebounded modestly through mid-October, aided by a rally in the broader stock market and a strong earnings report from J.P. Morgan Chase. Concerns of more loan losses and a disappointing report on September new home sales provided for a modest retreat in thrift prices in late-October. After bouncing higher on a better-than-expected report for third quarter GDP growth, financial stocks led the broader market lower at the end of October in the face of a negative report on consumer spending. In contrast to the broader market, thrift stocks edged lower following the Federal Reserve’s early-November statement that it would leave the federal funds rate unchanged. Thrift stocks rebounded along with the broader market going into mid-November, following some positive reports on the economy and comments from the Federal Reserve that interest rates would remain low amid concerns that unemployment and troubles in commercial real estate would weigh on the economic recovery. Fresh economic data that underscored expectations for a slow economic recovery and Dubai debt worries pushed thrift stocks lower during the second half of November. Financial stocks led a broader market rebound at the close of November and into early-December, which was supported by a favorable report for home sales in October and expectations that the Dubai debt crisis would have a limited impact on U.S. banks. The favorable employment report for November added to gains in the thrift sector in early-December. Financial stocks edged higher in mid-December on news that Citigroup was repaying TARP funds, which was followed by a pullback following a report that wholesale inflation rose more than expected in November and mid-December

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.12
unemployment claims were higher than expected. More attractive valuations supported a snap-back rally in thrift stocks heading into late-December, which was followed by a narrow trading range for the thrift sector through year end. Overall, the SNL Index for all publicly-traded thrifts was down 10.2% in 2009, which reflects significant declines in the trading prices of several large publicly-traded thrifts during 2009 pursuant to reporting significant losses due to deterioration in credit quality.
     Thrift stocks traded in a narrow range during the first few weeks of 2010, as investors awaited fourth quarter earnings reports that would provide further insight on credit quality trends. An unexpected jump in jobless claims and proposed restrictions by the White House on large banks depressed financial stocks in general heading into late-January. Amid mixed earnings reports, thrift stocks traded in a narrow range for the balance of January. Financial stocks led the broader market lower in early-February and then rebounded along with the broader market in mid-February on some positive economic data including signs that prices were rising in some large metropolitan areas. Mild inflation readings for wholesale and consumer prices in January sustained the upward trend in thrift stocks heading into the second half of February. Comments by the Federal Reserve Chairman that short-term interest rates were likely to remain low for at least several months helped thrift stocks to ease higher in late-February.
     The thrift sector moved higher along with the broader stock market in-early March 2010, aided by the better-than-expected employment report for February. Financial stocks propelled the market higher heading into mid-March on optimism that Citigroup would be able to repay the U.S. Government after a successful offering of trust preferred securities. The Federal Reserve’s recommitment to leaving its target rate unchanged “for an extended period” sustained the positive trend in thrift stocks through mid-March. Thrift stocks bounced higher along with the broader stock market heading into late-March, which was followed by a slight pullback as debt worries sent the yields on Treasury notes higher.
     An improving outlook for financial stocks in general, along with positive reports for housing, employment and retail sales, boosted thrift stocks at the start of the second quarter of 2010. A nominal increase in March consumer prices and a strong first quarter earnings report from JP Morgan Chase & Co. supported a broad rally in bank and thrift stocks heading into mid-April, which was followed by a pullback on news that the SEC charged Goldman Sachs with fraud. Thrift stocks generally underperformed the broader stock market during the second half of April, as financial stocks in general were hurt by uncertainty about the progress of financial

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.13
reform legislation, Greece’s debt crisis and news of a criminal investigation of Goldman Sachs. Thrift stocks retreated along the broader stock market in the first week of May, based on fears that the growing debt crisis in Europe could hurt the economic recovery. Likewise, thrift stocks surged higher along with the broader stock market after European Union officials announced a massive bailout plan to avert a public-debt crisis and then retreated heading into the second half of May on lingering concerns about the euro. News of rising mortgage delinquencies in the first quarter of 2010, an expected slowdown in new home construction and uncertainty over financial reform legislation further contributed to lower trading prices for thrift stocks. Thrift stocks participated in the one-day broader market rally in late-May and then declined along with the broader stock market at the close of May. Some positive economic reports provided a boost to thrift stocks at the start of June, which was followed a sharp decline in the sector on the disappointing employment report for May. Gains in the broader stock market provided a boost to thrift stocks as well heading in mid-June. Weaker-than-expected housing data for May and uncertainty surrounding the final stages of the financial reform legislation pressured thrift stocks lower in late-June.
     Thrift stocks declined along with the broader stock market at the start of the third quarter of 2010, as home sales in May declined sharply following the expiration of a special tax credit for home buyers. A report showing that home loan delinquencies increased in May further depressed thrift stocks, while the broader market moved higher on more attractive valuations. Financial stocks helped to lead the stock market higher through mid-July, as State Street projected a second quarter profit well above analysts’ forecasts which fueled a more optimistic outlook for second quarter earnings reports for the financial sector. Thrift stocks retreated along with the financial sector in general in mid-July on disappointing retail sales data for June and second quarter earnings results for Bank of America and Citigroup reflecting an unexpected drop in their revenues. Some favorable second quarter earnings reports which reflected improving credit measures helped to lift the thrift sector in late-July and at the beginning of August. Thrift stocks pulled back along with the broader market on weak employment data for July, which raised fresh concerns about the strength of the economy and the risk of deflation. The sell-off in thrift stocks became more pronounced in the second half of August, with signs of slower growth impacting most sectors of the stock market. Thrift stocks were particularly hard hit by the dismal housing data for July, which showed sharp declines in both existing and new home sales. On August 26, 2010, the SNL Index for all publicly-traded thrifts closed at 521.4, a decrease of 7.5% from one year ago and a decrease of 11.2% year-to-date.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.14
     B.  The New Issue Market
     In addition to thrift stock market conditions in general, the new issue market for converting thrifts is also an important consideration in determining the Company’s pro forma market value. The new issue market is separate and distinct from the market for seasoned thrift stocks in that the pricing ratios for converting issues are computed on a pro forma basis, specifically: (1) the numerator and denominator are both impacted by the conversion offering amount, unlike existing stock issues in which price change affects only the numerator; and (2) the pro forma pricing ratio incorporates assumptions regarding source and use of proceeds, effective tax rates, stock plan purchases, etc. which impact pro forma financials, whereas pricing for existing issues are based on reported financials. The distinction between pricing of converting and existing issues is perhaps no clearer than in the case of the price/book (“P/B”) ratio in that the P/B ratio of a converting thrift will typically result in a discount to book value whereas in the current market for existing thrifts the P/B ratio may reflect a premium to book value. Therefore, it is appropriate to also consider the market for new issues, both at the time of the conversion and in the aftermarket.
     Two standard conversions and six second-step conversions have been completed during the past three months. The recently completed second-step conversion offerings are considered to be more relevant for our analysis, which were completed in late-June and the first half of July. In general, second-step conversions tend to be priced (and trade in the aftermarket) at higher P/B ratios than standard conversions. We believe investors take into consideration the generally more leveraged pro forma balance sheets of second-step companies, their track records as public companies prior to conversion, and their generally higher pro forma ROE measures relative to standard conversions in pricing their common stocks. As shown in Table 4.1, with the exception of Oritani Financial Corp., all of the second- step conversion offerings were completed between the minimum and midpoint of their offering ranges. Oritani Financial Corp.’s offering was completed at slightly above the midpoint of its offering range. The average closing pro forma price/tangible book ratio of the recent second-step conversion offerings equaled 79.1%. On average, the second-step conversion offerings reflected a 2.3% decrease in price from their IPO prices after the first week of trading. As of August 26, 2010, the recent second-step conversion offerings reflected an average decrease of 3.8% in price from their IPO prices.

 


 

     

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.15
Table 4.1
Pricing Characteristics and After-Market Trends
Recent Conversions Completed (Last Three Months)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
 
  Institutional Information     Pre-Conversion Data     Offering Information     Contribution to     Insider Purchases               Pro Forma Data               Post-IPO Pricing Trends  
                    Financial Info.     Asset Quality                                       Charitable Found.     % Off Incl. Fdn.                         Pricing Ratios(3)     Financial Charac.               Closing Price:  
                                                                                                        Benefit Plans                                                                                                                                
                                                                                          Initial                                                   First       After         After                
      Conver.             Equity/     NPAs/   Res.     Gross   %   % of   Exp./         % of         Recog.     Stk     Mgmt.&     Dividend         Core         Core       Core     IPO     Trading   %     First   %     First   %     Thru   %  
  Institution   Date   Ticker     Assets   Assets     Assets   Cov.     Proc.   Offered   Mid.   Proc.     Form   Offering     ESOP   Plans     Option     Dirs.     Yield     P/TB   P/E   P/A     ROA   TE/A   ROE     Price     Day   Change     Week(4)   Change     Month(5)   Change     8/26/10   Change  
                    ($Mil)   (%)     (%)   (%)     ($Mil.)   (%)   (%)   (%)         (%)     (%)   (%)     (%)     (%)(2)     (%)     (%)   (x)   (%)     (%)   (%)   (%)     ($)     ($)   (%)     ($)   (%)     ($)   (%)     ($)   (%)  
                                                                                               
 
Standard Conversions
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Peoples Federal Bancshares, Inc. — MA
    7/7/10     PEOP-NASDAQ     $ 488       10.77 %       0.32 %     199 %     $ 66.1       100 %     132 %     2.8 %     Stock     8.0 %       8.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       3.3 %       0.00 %       64.7 %     45.5       13.1 %       0.3 %     20.2 %     1.4 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.40       4.0 %     $ 10.69       6.9 %     $ 10.42       4.2 %     $ 10.19       1.9 %  
 
Fairmount Bancorp, Inc. — MD
    6/3/10     FMTB-OTCBB     $ 67       10.57 %       0.40 %     152 %     $ 4.4       100 %     89 %     15.8 %     N.A.     N.A.         8.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       14.6 %       0.00 %       43.9 %     11.4       6.5 %       0.6 %     14.8 %     0.6 %     $ 10.00       $ 11.00       10.0 %     $ 12.00       20.0 %     $ 11.00       10.0 %     $ 11.75       17.5 %  
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
  Averages — Standard Conversions:
    $ 278       10.67 %       0.36 %     176 %     $ 35.3       100 %     111 %     9.3 %     N.A.     8.0 %       8.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       9.0 %       0.00 %       54.3 %     28.5x       9.8 %       0.5 %     17.5 %     1.0 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.70       7.0 %     $ 11.35       13.45 %     $ 10.71       7.10 %     $ 10.97       9.70 %  
  Medians — Standard Conversions:
    $ 278       10.67 %       0.36 %     176 %     $ 35.3       100 %     111 %     9.3 %     N.A.     8.0 %       8.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       9.0 %       0.00 %       54.3 %     28.5x       9.8 %       0.5 %     17.5 %     1.0 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.70       7.0 %     $ 11.35       13.45 %     $ 10.71       7.10 %     $ 10.97       9.70 %  
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Second Step Conversions
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Jacsonville Bancorp, Inc. — IL
    7/15/10     JXSB-NASDAQ     $ 290       9.12 %       1.02 %     111 %     $ 10.4       54 %     89 %     12.0 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     0.0 %       10.0 %       9.6 %       3.00 %       59.3 %     19.07       6.5 %       0.3 %     11.0 %     2.9 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.65       6.5 %     $ 10.58       5.8 %     $ 10.13       1.3 %     $ 10.43       4.3 %  
 
Colonial Financial Services — NJ
    7/13/10     COBK-NASDAQ     $ 568       8.20 %       0.43 %     124 %     $ 23.0       55 %     85 %     8.0 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       1.6 %       0.00 %       63.4 %     14.01       7.1 %       0.5 %     11.2 %     4.5 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.05       0.5 %     $ 9.65       -3.5 %     $ 9.80       -2.0 %     $ 9.60       -4.0 %  
 
Oneida Financial Corp. — NY
    7/7/10     ONFC-NASDAQ     $ 596       9.61 %       0.90 %     1041 %     $ 31.5       55 %     100 %     8.0 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       4.2 %       6.00 %       97.3 %     15.12       9.2 %       0.6 %     9.9 %     4.5 %     $ 8.00       $ 7.50       -6.3 %     $ 7.50       -6.3 %     $ 7.90       -1.3 %     $ 7.70       -3.8 %  
 
View Point Financial Group — TX
    7/7/10     VPFG-NASDAQ     $ 2,477       8.42 %       0.61 %     108 %     $ 198.6       57 %     99 %     4.0 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       0.2 %       0.00 %       93.2 %     28.61       13.2 %       0.5 %     14.2 %     3.3 %     $ 10.00       $ 9.50       -5.0 %     $ 9.55       -4.5 %     $ 9.70       -3.0 %     $ 9.09       -9.1 %  
 
Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. — PA
    6/29/10     FXCB-NASDAQ     $ 1,156       10.83 %       2.91 %     38 %     $ 87.1       60 %     85 %     5.0 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     3.1 %       7.9 %       0.7 %       0.00 %       72.1 %   NM     11.8 %       -0.1 %     16.4 %     -0.6 %     $ 10.00       $ 9.59       -4.1 %     $ 9.60       -4.0 %     $ 9.68       -3.2 %     $ 9.53       -4.7 %  
 
Oritani Financial Corp. — NJ
    6/24/10     ORIT-NASDAQ     $ 2,054       12.38 %       2.03 %     60 %     $ 413.6       74 %     106 %     2.8 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       0.5 %       3.00 %       89.4 %     38.03       23.0 %       0.6 %     25.7 %     2.4 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.31       3.1 %     $ 9.86       -1.4 %     $ 9.91       -0.9 %     $ 9.42       -5.8 %  
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
  Averages — Second Step Conversions:
    $ 1,190       9.76 %       1.32 %     247 %     $ 127.4       59 %     94 %     6.6 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     3.2 %       9.7 %       2.8 %       2.00 %       79.1 %     23.0x       11.8 %       0.4 %     14.7 %     2.8 %     $ 9.67       $ 9.60       -0.9 %     $ 9.46       -2.3 %     $ 9.52       -1.5 %     $ 9.30       -3.8 %  
  Medians — Second Step Conversions:
    $ 876       9.37 %       0.96 %     110 %     $ 59.3       56 %     94 %     6.5 %     N.A.     N.A.         4.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       1.2 %       1.50 %       80.8 %     19.1x       10.5 %       0.5 %     12.7 %     3.1 %     $ 10.00       $ 9.82       -1.8 %     $ 9.63       -3.8 %     $ 9.75       -1.6 %     $ 9.48       -4.4 %  
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Mutual Holding Company Conversions
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
  Averages — Mutual Holding Company Conversions:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
  Medians — Mutual Holding Company Conversions:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
  Averages — All Conversions:
    $ 962       9.99 %       1.08 %     229 %     $ 104.3       69 %     98 %     7.3 %     NA     8.0 %       5.0 %     3.4 %       9.7 %       4.3 %       1.50 %       72.9 %     24.5x       11.3 %       0.4 %     15.4 %     2.4 %     $ 9.75       $ 9.88       1.1 %     $ 9.93       1.6 %     $ 9.82       0.6 %     $ 9.71       -0.5 %  
  Medians — All Conversions:
    $ 582       10.09 %       0.76 %     118 %     $ 48.8       59 %     94 %     6.5 %     NA     8.0 %       4.0 %     4.0 %       10.0 %       2.5 %       0.00 %       68.4 %     19.1x       10.5 %       0.5 %     14.5 %     2.6 %     $ 10.00       $ 10.18       1.8 %     $ 9.76       -2.5 %     $ 9.86       -1.1 %     $ 9.57       -3.9 %  
 
 
    Note: * — Appraisal performed by RP Financial; BOLD=RP Financial did the Conversion Business Plan. “NT” — Not Traded; “NA” — Not Applicable, Not Available; C/S-Cash/Stock.
 
(1)   Non-OTS regulated thrift.
 
(2)   As a percent of MHC offering for MHC transactions.
 
(3)   Does not take into account the adoption of SOP 93-6.
 
(4)   Latest price if offering is less than one week old.
 
(5)   Latest price if offering is more than one week but less than one month old.
 
(6)   Mutual holding company pro forma data on full conversion basis.
 
(7)   Simultaneously completed acquisition of another financial institution.
 
(8)   Simultaneously converted to a commercial bank charter.
 
(9)   Former credit union.
August 26, 2010


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.16
     Shown in Table 4.2 are the current pricing ratios for the fully-converted offerings completed during the past three months that trade on NASDAQ or an Exchange. The current average P/TB ratio for the recent fully-converted offerings equaled 73.79%, based on closing stock prices as of August 26, 2010.
     C. The Acquisition Market
     Also considered in the valuation was the potential impact on Rockville Financial’s stock price of recently completed and pending acquisitions of other thrift institutions operating in Connecticut. As shown in Exhibit IV-4, there was one Connecticut thrift acquisition completed from the beginning of 2006 through August 26, 2010, and there is currently one acquisition pending for a Connecticut savings institution which is the recently announced acquisition of NewAlliance Bancshares by First Niagara Financial Group. The recent acquisition activity involving Connecticut savings institutions may imply a certain degree of acquisition speculation for the Company’s stock. To the extent that acquisition speculation may impact the Company’s offering, we have largely taken this into account in selecting companies for the Peer Group which operate in markets that have experienced a comparable level of acquisit ion activity as the Company’s market and, thus, are subject to the same type of acquisition speculation that may influence Rockville Financial’s stock. However, since converting thrifts are subject to a three-year regulatory moratorium from being acquired, acquisition speculation in Rockville Financial’s stock would tend to be less compared to the stocks of the Peer Group companies.
     D. Trading in Rockville Financial’s Stock
     Since Rockville Financial’s minority stock currently trades under the symbol “RCKB” on NASDAQ, RP Financial also considered the recent trading activity in the valuation analysis. Rockville Financial had a total of 18,853,112 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010, of which 8,163,862 shares were held by public shareholders and traded as public securities. The Company’s stock has had a 52 week trading range of $8.82 to $14.43 per share and its closing price on August 26, 2010 was $11.43 for an implied market value of $215.5 million.
     There are significant differences between the Company’s minority stock (currently being traded) and the conversion stock that will be issued by the Company. Such differences include different liquidity characteristics, a different return on equity for the conversion stock, the stock is currently traded based on speculation of a range of exchange ratios and dividend payments, if any, will be made on all shares outst anding. Since the pro forma impact has not been publicly

 


 

     

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.17
Table 4.2
Market Pricing Comparatives
Prices As of August 26, 2010
                                                                                                                                                                 
    Market   Per Share Data                                                
    Capitalization   Core   Book                                           Dividends(4)   Financial Characteristics(6)
    Price/   Market   12 Month   Value/   Pricing Ratios(3)   Amount/           Payout   Total   Equity/   Tang Eq/   NPAs/   Reported   Core
Financial Institution   Share(1)   Value   EPS(2)   Share   P/E   P/B   P/A   P/TB   P/Core   Share   Yield   Ratio(5)   Assets   Assets   Assets   Assets   ROA   ROE   ROA   ROE
    ($)   ($Mil)   ($)   ($)   (x)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (x)   ($)   (%)   (%)   ($Mil)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)
All Public Companies
  $ 9.55     $ 270.27     $ (0.12 )   $ 12.77       18.46x       75.64 %     9.12 %     83.11 %     18.15x     $ 0.23       2.01 %     30.41 %   $ 2,698       11.65 %     10.89 %     4.15 %     -0.10 %     0.67 %     -0.14 %     -0.02 %
Converted Last 3 Months (no MHC)
  $ 9.42     $ 167.58     $ 0.34     $ 13.94       21.10x       69.09 %     11.47 %     73.79 %     18.52x     $ 0.18       2.10 %     12.66 %   $ 1,202       11.20 %     10.54 %     0.85 %     0.33 %     3.50 %     0.35 %     3.87 %
 
                                                                                                                                                               
Converted Last 3 Months (no MHC)
                                                                                                                                                               
COBK Colonial Financial Services of NJ
  $ 9.60     $ 40.06     $ 0.71     $ 15.78       20.00x       60.84 %     6.82 %     60.84 %     13.52x     $ 0.00       0.00 %     0.00 %   $ 587       7.46 %     7.46 %   NA     0.34 %     4.58 %     0.50 %     6.77 %
FXCB Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. of PA
  $ 9.53     $ 138.63     $ (0.13 )   $ 14.19     NM     67.16 %     11.15 %     67.16 %   NM   $ 0.00       0.00 %   NM   $ 1,243       16.61 %     16.61 %   NA     -0.06 %     -0.51 %     -0.16 %     -1.34 %
JXSB Jacksonville Bancorp Inc. of IL
  $ 10.43     $ 20.07     $ 0.52     $ 18.27       13.20x       57.09 %     6.72 %     61.90 %     20.06x     $ 0.30       2.88 %     37.97 %   $ 298       8.59 %     7.67 %   NA     0.51 %     5.93 %     0.34 %     3.90 %
ONFC Oneida Financial Corp. of NY
  $ 7.70     $ 55.17     $ 0.53     $ 11.69       14.81x       65.87 %     8.86 %     93.67 %     14.53x     $ 0.53       6.88 %   NM   $ 623       8.74 %     5.11 %   NA     0.60 %     6.84 %     0.61 %     6.97 %
ORIT Oritani Financial Corp. of NJ
  $ 9.42     $ 529.42     $ 0.16     $ 11.45     NM     82.27 %     21.37 %     82.27 %   NM   $ 0.30       3.18 %   NM   $ 2,477       25.98 %     25.98 %   NA     0.40 %     2.59 %     0.43 %     2.76 %
PEOP Peoples Federal Bncshrs. Inc. of MA
  $ 10.19     $ 72.78     $ 0.22     $ 15.45       36.39x       65.95 %     13.34 %     65.95 %   NM   $ 0.00       0.00 %     0.00 %   $ 546       0.00 %     0.00 %   NA     0.37 %   NM     0.29 %   NM
VPFG ViewPoint Financial Group of TX
  $ 9.09     $ 316.92     $ 0.35     $ 10.76     NM     84.48 %     12.00 %     84.72 %     25.97x     $ 0.16       1.76 %   NM   $ 2,642       11.05 %     10.98 %     0.85 %     0.17 %     1.55 %     0.46 %     4.18 %
 
(1)   Average of High/Low or Bid/Ask price per share.
 
(2)   EPS (estimate core basis) is based on actual trailing 12 month data, adjusted to omit non-operating items on a tax-effected basis.
 
(3)   P/E = Price to earnings; P/B = Price to book; P/A = Price to assets; P/TB = Price to tangible book value; and P/Core = Price to core earnings.
 
(4)   Indicated 12 month dividend, based on last quarterly dividend declared.
 
(5)   Indicated 12 month dividend as a percent of trailing 12 month estimated core earnings.
 
(6)   ROA (return on assets) and ROE (return on equity) are indicated ratios based on trailing 12 month common earnings and average common equity and total assets balances.
 
(7)   Excludes from averages and medians those companies the subject of actual or rumored acquisition activities or unusual operating characteristics.
Source: SNL Financial, LC. and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this report has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.18
disseminated to date, it is appropriate to discount the current trading level. As the pro forma impact is made known publicly, the trading level will become more informative.
* * * * * * * * * * *
          In determining our valuation adjustment for marketing of the issue, we considered trends in both the overall thrift market, the new issue market including the new issue market for second-step conversions, the acquisition market and recent trading activity in the Company’s minority stock. Taking these factors and trends into account, RP Financial concluded that a slight downward adjustment was appropriate in the valuation analysis for purposes of marketing of the issue.
     8.  Management
          The Company’s management team appears to have experience and expertise in all of the key areas of the Company’s operations. Exhibit IV-5 provides summary resumes of the Company’s Board of Directors and senior management. The financial characteristics of the Company suggest that the Board and senior management have been effective in implementing an operating strategy that can be well managed by the Company’s present organizational structure.
          In June 2010, the Company announced that the President and CEO, will retire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in April 2011. In addition, the Company’s EVP and COO retired effective June 30, 2010, with his responsibilities assumed by two senior executives of the Company. The Company has retained a third party to engage in a search for the President and CEO successor, who is expected to be identified by January 2011. A new COO may be named after consultation with the new CEO. The current CEO will remain on the Board until his term expires in 2013, but could possibly continue in a consulting role for the Company after retirement. The former COO remains on the Board until 2011 and currently consults for the Company. Importantly, given the Company’s current strong operations, history of profitable operations, status as a full stock company and Connecticut location where there is a number of prospective qualified management candidates, we believe the prospective CEO vacancy does not represent a significant obstacle to the Company’s future operations.
          Overall, the returns, equity positions and other operating measures of the Peer Group companies are indicative of well-managed financial institutions, which have Boards and management teams that have been effective in implementing competitive operating strategies.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.19
Therefore, on balance, we concluded no valuation adjustment relative to the Peer Group was appropriate for this factor.
9. Effect of Government Regulation and Regulatory Reform
     In summary, as a fully-converted regulated institution, Rockville Financial will operate in substantially the same regulatory environment as the Peer Group members — all of whom are adequately capitalized institutions and are operating with no apparent restrictions. Exhibit IV-6 reflects the Company’s pro forma regulatory capital ratios. On balance, no adjustment has been applied for the effect of government regulation and regulatory reform.
Summary of Adjustments
     Overall, based on the factors discussed above, we concluded that the Company’s pro forma market value should reflect the following valuation adjustments relative to the Peer Group:
     
Key Valuation Parameters:   Valuation Adjustment
Financial Condition
  Slight Upward
Profitability, Growth and Viability of Earnings
  Slight Upward
Asset Growth
  No Adjustment
Primary Market Area
  No Adjustment
Dividends
  No Adjustment
Liquidity of the Shares
  No Adjustment
Marketing of the Issue
  Slight Downward
Management
  No Adjustment
Effect of Govt. Regulations and Regulatory Reform
  No Adjustment
Valuation Approaches
     In applying the accepted valuation methodology promulgated by the OTS and adopted by the FDIC, i.e., the pro forma market value approach, we considered the three key pricing ratios in valuing the Company’s to-be-issued stock — price/earnings (“P/E”), price/book (“P/B”), and price/assets (“P/A”) approaches — all performed on a pro forma basis including the effects of the stock proceeds. In computing the pro forma impact of the conversion and the related pricing ratios, we have incorporated the valuation parameters disclosed in the Company’s prospectus for reinvestment rate, effective tax rate, stock benefit plan assumptions and expenses (summarized in Exhibits IV-7 and IV-8).

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.20
     In our estimate of value, we assessed the relationship of the pro forma pricing ratios relative to the Peer Group and recent conversion offerings.
     RP Financial’s valuation placed an emphasis on the following:
    P/E Approach . The P/E approach is generally the best indicator of long-term value for a stock and we have given it the most significant weight among the valuation approaches. Given certain similarities between the Company’s and the Peer Group’s earnings composition and overall financial condition, the P/E approach was carefully considered in this valuation. At the same time, recognizing that (1) the earnings multiples will be evaluated on a pro forma basis for the Company; and (2) the Peer Group companies have had the opportunity to realize the benefit of reinvesting and leveraging the offering proceeds, we also gave weight to the other valuation approaches.
 
    P/B Approach . P/B ratios have generally served as a useful benchmark in the valuation of thrift stocks, particularly in the context of a conversion offering, as the earnings approach involves assumptions regarding the use of proceeds. RP Financial considered the P/B approach to be a valuable indicator of pro forma value, taking into account the pricing ratios under the P/E and P/A approaches. We have also modified the P/B approach to exclude the impact of intangible assets (i.e., price/tangible book value or “P/TB”), in that the investment community frequently makes this adjustment in its evaluation of this pricing approach.
 
    P/A Approach . P/A ratios are generally a less reliable indicator of market value, as investors typically assign less weight to assets and attribute greater weight to book value and earnings. Furthermore, this approach as set forth in the regulatory valuation guidelines does not take into account the amount of stock purchases funded by deposit withdrawals, thus understating the pro forma P/A ratio. At the same time, the P/A ratio is an indicator of franchise value, and, in the case of highly capitalized institutions, high P/A ratios may limit the investment community’s willingness to pay market multiples for earnings or book value when ROE is expected to be low.
 
    Trading of RCKB stock . Converting institutions generally do not have stock outstanding. Rockville Financial, however, has public shares outstanding due to the mutual holding company form of ownership. Since Rockville Financial is currently traded on NASDAQ, it is an indicator of investor interest in the Company’s conversion stock and therefore received some weight in our valuation. Based on the August 26, 2010, stock price of $11.43 per share and the 18,853,112 shares of Rockville Financial stock outstanding, the Company’s implied market value of $215.5 million was considered in the valuation process. However, since the conversion stock will have different characteristics than the minority shares, and since pro forma information has not been publicly disseminated to date, the current trading price of Rockville Financial’s stock was somewhat discounted herein but will become more important towards the closing of the offering.
     The Company has adopted Statement of Position (“SOP”) 93-6, which causes earnings per share computations to be based on shares issued and outstanding excluding unreleased

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.21
ESOP shares. For purposes of preparing the pro forma pricing analyses, we have reflected all shares issued in the offering, including all ESOP shares, to capture the full dilutive impact, particularly since the ESOP shares are economically dilutive, receive dividends and can be voted. However, we did consider the impact of the adoption of SOP 93-6 in the valuation.
     In preparing the pro forma pricing analysis we have taken into account the pro forma impact of the MHC net assets that will be consolidated with the Company and thus will increase equity and earnings. At June 30, 2010, the MHC had unconsolidated net assets of $7.7 million, which reflects the initial capital at the time of the MHC reorganization and the accumulated dividends on the MHC shares, as well as the earnings of such funds. As mentioned previously, while the consolidation of these assets increases the pro forma value of the Company, it also results in some pro forma ownership dilution for the minority shareholders pursuant to the application of FDIC policy regarding such assets in prior second step conversion transactions. Specifically, we have adjusted the minority ownership ratio from the current 43.30% ratio to 41.81% to account for the impact of MHC assets and have reflected the formula based on applicable FDIC policy on the following page.
     Based on the application of the three valuation approaches, taking into consideration the valuation adjustments discussed above, RP Financial concluded that as of August 26, 2010, the aggregate pro forma market value of Rockville Financial’s conversion stock equaled $223,406,080 at the midpoint, equal to 22,340,608 shares at $10.00 per share. The $10.00 per share price was determined by the Rockville Financial Board. The midpoint and resulting valuation range is based on the sale of a 58.19% ownership interest for the consolidation of the MHC net assets to the public (as adjusted above), which provides for a $130,000,000 public offering at the midpoint value, and considers the pro forma impact of a cash contribution to the Foundation equal to 3% of the net offering proceeds (i.e., gross proceeds less expenses).
     1.  Price-to-Earnings (“P/E”) . The application of the P/E valuation method requires calculating the Company’s pro forma market value by applying a valuation P/E multiple to the pro forma earnings base. In applying this technique, we considered both reported earnings and a recurring earnings base, that is, earnings adjusted to exclude any one-time non-operating items, plus the estimated after-tax earnings benefit of the reinvestment of the net proceeds. The Company’s reported earnings equaled $11.540 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. In deriving Rockville Financial’s core earnings, the adjustments made to reported earnings were to eliminate gains on the sale of loans ($977,000), gains on the sale of investment securities ($188,000), and OTTI on securities ($5,000). As shown below, on a tax

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.22
Rockville Financial, Inc. (“Mid-Tier”)
Impact of MHC Assets & Waived Dividends on Minority Ownership In 2nd Step
Financial and Stock Ownership Data as of June 30, 2010
Reflects Appraised Pro Forma Market Value as of August 26, 2010
Key Input Assumptions
             
Mid-Tier Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 162,384,000     (BOOK)
Aggregate Dividends Waived by MHC
  $ 0     (WAIVED DIVIDENDS)
Minority Ownership Interest
    43.30 %   (PCT)
Pro Forma Market Value
  $ 223,406,080     (VALUE)
Market Value of MHC Assets (Other than Stock in Bank)
  $ 7,685,000     (MHC ASSETS)      (1)
Adjustment for MHC Assets & Waived Diviends — 2 Step Calculation (as required by FDIC & FRB)
             
Step 1: To Account for Waiver of Dividends
  =   (BOOK — WAIVED DIVIDENDS) x PCT
BOOK
 
           
 
  =     43.30 %
 
           
Step 2: To Account for MHC Assets
  =   (VALUE — MHC ASSETS) x Step 1
VALUE
 
           
 
  =     41.81% (rounded)
 
Current Ownership
                 
MHC Shares
    10,689,250       56.70 %
Public Shares
    8,163,862       43.30 %
 
               
Total Shares
    18,853,112       100.00 %
Pro Forma Ownership (2)
                                 
                    Appraised Midpoint Value  
                    Per Share     Aggregate  
Shares Issued in Offering (3)
    13,000,000       58.19 % (5)   $ 10.00     $ 130,000,000  
Public Shares (3)
    9,340,608       41.81 % (5)   $ 10.00     $ 93,406,080  
 
                         
Pro Forma Shares (4)
    22,340,608       100.00 %   $ 10.00     $ 223,406,080  
 
(1)   Net assets at MHC level, less aggregate dividends paid to MHC
 
(2)   Adjusted for exchange ratio reflecting offering of $10.00 per share
 
(3)   Incorporates adjustment in ownership ratio for MHC assets and waived dividends
 
(4)   Reflects pro forma shares outstanding
 
(5)   Rounded to two decimal points.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.23
effected basis, assuming an effective marginal tax rate of 34.0% for the earnings adjustments, the Company’s core earnings were determined to equal $10.774 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. (Note: see Exhibit IV-9 for the adjustments applied to the Peer Group’s earnings in the calculation of core earnings).
         
    Amount  
    ($000)  
Net income (loss)
  $ 11,540  
Deduct: Gain on sale of loans
    (977 )
Deduct: Gain on sale of investments
    (188 )
Add: Impairment loss on securities (1)
    5  
Tax effect
    394  
 
     
Core earnings estimate
  $ 10,774  
 
(1)   Tax effected at 34.0%.
     Based on the Company’s reported and estimated core earnings, and incorporating the impact of the pro forma assumptions discussed previously, the Company’s pro forma reported and core P/E multiples at the $223.4 million midpoint value equaled 20.29 times and 21.81 times, respectively, indicating premiums of 20.2% for both, relative to the Peer Group’s average reported and core earnings multiples of 16.88 times and 18.15 times, respectively (see Table 4.3). In comparison to the Peer Group’s median reported and core earnings multiples of 14.37 times and 16.24 times, respectively, the Company’s pro forma reported and core P/E multiples at the midpoint value indicated premiums of 41.2% and 34.3%, respectively. The Company’s pro forma P/E ratios based on reported earnings at the minimum and the supermaximum equaled 17.13 times and 27.24 times, respectively, and based on core earnings at the minimum and the supermaximum equaled 18.40 times and 29.31 times, respectively.
     2.  Price-to-Book (“P/B”) . The application of the P/B valuation method requires calculating the Company’s pro forma market value by applying a valuation P/B ratio, as derived from the Peer Group’s P/B ratio, to the Company’s pro forma book value. Based on the $223.4 million midpoint valuation, the Company’s pro forma P/B and P/TB ratios equaled 79.62% and 80.00%, respectively. In comparison to the average P/B and P/TB ratios for the Peer Group of 92.57% and 103.83%, the Company’s ratios reflected a discount of 14.0% on a P/B basis and a discount of 23.0% on a P/TB basis. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/B and P/TB ratios of 91.33% and 107.99%, respectively, the Company’s pro forma P/B and P/TB ratios at the midpoint value reflected discounts of 12.8% and 26.0%, respectively. At the top of the super range, the Company’s P/B and P/TB ratios equaled 93.20% and 93.55%, respectively. In comparison to the Peer Group’s average P/B and P/TB ratios, the Company’s P/B and P/TB

 


 

     

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.24
Table 4.3
Public Market Pricing
Rockville Financial, Inc. and the Comparables
As of August 26, 2010
                                                                                                                                                                                 
    Market   Per Share Data                                                                        
    Capitalization   Core   Book                                           Dividends(4)   Financial Characteristics(6)           2nd Step
    Price/   Market   12 Month   Value/   Pricing Ratios(3)   Amount/           Payout   Total   Equity/   Tang Eq/   NPAs/   Reported   Core   Exchange   Offering
    Share(1)   Value   EPS(2)   Share   P/E   P/B   P/A   P/TB   P/Core   Share   Yield   Ratio(5)   Assets   Assets   Assets   Assets   ROA   ROE   ROA   ROE   Ratio   Amount
    ($)   ($Mil)   ($)   ($)   (x)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (x)   ($)   (%)   (%)   ($Mil)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)     ($Mil)
Rockville Financial, Inc.
                                                                                                                                                                               
Superrange
  $ 10.00     $ 295.45     $ 0.34     $ 10.73       27.24x       93.20 %     16.82 %     93.55 %     29.31x     $ 0.16       1.60 %     46.90 %   $ 1,757       18.04 %     17.99 %     0.99 %     0.62 %     3.42 %     0.57 %     3.18 %     1.5131     $ 171.93  
Maximum
  $ 10.00     $ 256.92     $ 0.40     $ 11.58       23.50x       86.36 %     14.79 %     86.66 %     25.27x     $ 0.18       1.80 %     45.49 %   $ 1,737       17.13 %     17.07 %     1.00 %     0.63 %     3.67 %     0.59 %     3.42 %     1.3158     $ 149.50  
Midpoint
  $ 10.00     $ 223.41     $ 0.46     $ 12.56       20.29x       79.62 %     12.99 %     79.94 %     21.81x     $ 0.21       2.10 %     45.80 %   $ 1,720       16.32 %     16.26 %     1.01 %     0.64 %     3.92 %     0.60 %     3.65 %     1.1441     $ 130.00  
Minimum
  $ 10.00     $ 189.90     $ 0.54     $ 13.89       17.13x       71.99 %     11.15 %     72.31 %     18.40x     $ 0.25       2.50 %     46.00 %   $ 1,703       15.49 %     15.43 %     1.02 %     0.65 %     4.20 %     0.61 %     3.91 %     0.9725     $ 110.50  
 
All Non-MHC Public Companies (7)
                                                                                                                                                                               
Averages
  $ 9.96     $ 310.56     $ (0.20 )   $ 13.92       18.32x       69.82 %     8.10 %     77.62 %     17.69x     $ 0.24       2.03 %     31.90 %   $ 2,930       11.35 %     10.56 %     3.93 %     -0.17 %     0.36 %     -0.23 %     -0.63 %                
Medians
  $ 9.60     $ 60.84     $ 0.19     $ 13.56       15.19x       67.16 %     6.77 %     73.61 %     16.20x     $ 0.20       1.79 %     0.00 %   $ 967       9.85 %     8.97 %     2.62 %     0.22 %     2.45 %     0.17 %     1.61 %                
 
All Non-MHC State of CT(7)
                                                                                                                                                                               
Averages
  $ 12.65     $ 2,992.43     $ 0.39     $ 14.33       22.95x       88.33 %     18.22 %     137.26 %     23.37x     $ 0.45       3.56 %     50.91 %   $ 15,332       20.73 %     14.57 %     0.00 %     0.53 %     2.78 %     0.53 %     2.78 %                
Medians
  $ 12.65     $ 2,992.43     $ 0.39     $ 14.33       22.95x       88.33 %     18.22 %     137.26 %     23.37x     $ 0.45       3.56 %     51.85 %   $ 15,332       20.73 %     14.57 %     0.00 %     0.53 %     2.78 %     0.53 %     2.78 %                
 
Comparable Group Averages
                                                                                                                                                                               
Averages
  $ 14.15     $ 188.76     $ 0.98     $ 15.20       16.88x       92.57 %     10.94 %     103.83 %     18.15x     $ 0.42       3.09 %     43.53 %   $ 1,599       11.95 %     10.91 %     0.96 %     0.64 %     6.24 %     0.59 %     5.82 %                
Medians
  $ 11.49     $ 154.82     $ 0.64     $ 13.76       14.37x       91.33 %     9.74 %     107.99 %     16.24x     $ 0.34       3.11 %     46.15 %   $ 1,235       10.17 %     9.60 %     0.93 %     0.59 %     5.17 %     0.54 %     4.75 %                
 
Comparable Group
                                                                                                                                                                               
BFED Beacon FederalBancorp of NY
  $ 10.00     $ 65.21     $ 0.88     $ 16.31       12.66x       61.31 %     6.08 %     61.31 %     11.36x     $ 0.20       2.00 %     25.32 %   $ 1,072       9.92 %     9.92 %     1.56 %     0.48 %     5.06 %     0.54 %     5.63 %                
BRKL Brookline Bancorp, Inc. of MA
  $ 9.20     $ 543.15     $ 0.40     $ 8.34       21.40x       110.31 %     20.42 %     121.53 %     23.00x     $ 0.34       3.70 %   NM   $ 2,660       18.60 %     17.17 %     0.61 %     0.96 %     5.17 %     0.89 %     4.81 %                
DNBK Danvers Bancorp, Inc. of MA
  $ 15.11     $ 322.98     $ 0.56     $ 13.76       24.77x       109.81 %     12.77 %     124.16 %     26.98x     $ 0.08       0.53 %     13.11 %   $ 2,529       11.63 %     10.42 %     0.81 %     0.58 %     4.94 %     0.54 %     4.53 %                
ESBF ESB Financial Corp. of PA
  $ 12.86     $ 154.82     $ 1.12     $ 14.41       12.02x       89.24 %     7.95 %     118.31 %     11.48x     $ 0.40       3.11 %     37.38 %   $ 1,948       8.89 %     6.84 %     0.30 %     0.66 %     7.79 %     0.69 %     8.16 %                
ESSA ESSA Bancorp, Inc. of PA
  $ 11.00     $ 148.75     $ 0.32     $ 13.06       30.56x       84.23 %     13.94 %     84.23 %     34.38x     $ 0.20       1.82 %     55.56 %   $ 1,067       16.55 %     16.55 %     1.05 %     0.46 %     2.68 %     0.41 %     2.38 %                
HARL Harleysville Savings Fin. Corp. of PA
  $ 15.39     $ 56.54     $ 1.36     $ 14.29       11.40x       107.70 %     6.52 %     107.70 %     11.32x     $ 0.76       4.94 %     56.30 %   $ 867       6.05 %     6.05 %     0.06 %     0.59 %     9.74 %     0.59 %     9.81 %                
HIFS Hingham Institute for Savings of MA
  $ 38.47     $ 81.71     $ 4.28     $ 32.47       8.91x       118.48 %     8.41 %     118.48 %     8.99x     $ 0.92       2.39 %     21.30 %   $ 972       7.10 %     7.10 %     1.57 %     0.99 %     13.99 %     0.98 %     13.86 %                
NHTB NH Thrift Bancshares of NH
  $ 10.00     $ 57.72     $ 0.64     $ 14.30       8.33x       69.93 %     5.81 %     107.99 %     15.63x     $ 0.52       5.20 %     43.33 %   $ 993       9.31 %     6.57 %     0.37 %     0.74 %     7.80 %     0.39 %     4.16 %                
OCFC OceanFirst Fin. Corp of NJ
  $ 11.49     $ 216.28     $ 0.75     $ 10.35       14.19x       111.01 %     9.74 %     111.01 %     15.32x     $ 0.48       4.18 %     59.26 %   $ 2,220       8.78 %     8.78 %   NA     0.75 %     8.53 %     0.69 %     7.89 %                
PBNY Provident NY Bncrp, Inc. of NY
  $ 7.95     $ 307.09     $ 0.41     $ 11.11       15.29x       71.56 %     10.36 %     116.23 %     19.39x     $ 0.24       3.02 %     46.15 %   $ 2,964       14.48 %     9.44 %     1.11 %     0.68 %     4.74 %     0.54 %     3.73 %                
THRD TF Financial Corp. of New tow n PA
  $ 21.40     $ 57.46     $ 1.27     $ 27.31       14.56x       78.36 %     7.97 %     83.53 %     16.85x     $ 0.80       3.74 %     54.42 %   $ 721       10.17 %     9.60 %     2.21 %     0.55 %     5.50 %     0.48 %     4.75 %                
UBNK United Financial Bancorp of MA
  $ 13.66     $ 223.46     $ 0.59     $ 13.64       28.46x       100.15 %     14.46 %     104.04 %     23.15x     $ 0.32       2.34 %     66.67 %   $ 1,545       14.44 %     13.98 %     1.20 %     0.55 %     3.56 %     0.68 %     4.38 %                
WFD Westfield Financial Inc. of MA
  $ 7.48     $ 218.75     $ 0.13     $ 8.19     NM       91.33 %     17.71 %     91.33 %   NM     $ 0.24       3.21 %   NM   $ 1,235       19.39 %     19.39 %     0.63 %     0.34 %     1.64 %     0.31 %     1.52 %                
 
(1)   Average of High/Low or Bid/Ask price per share.
 
(2)   EPS (estimate core basis) is based on actual trailing 12 month data, adjusted to omit non-operating items on a tax-effected basis, and is shown on a pro forma basis where appropriate.
 
(3)   P/E = Price to earnings; P/B = Price to book; P/A = Price to assets; P/TB = Price to tangible book value; and P/Core = Price to core earnings.
 
(4)   Indicated 12 month dividend, based on last quarterly dividend declared.
 
(5)   Indicated 12 month dividend as a percent of trailing 12 month estimated core earnings.
 
(6)   ROA (return on assets) and ROE (return on equity) are indicated ratios based on trailing 12 month common earnings and average common equity and total assets balances.
 
(7)   Excludes from averages and medians those companies the subject of actual or rumored acquisition activities or unusual operating characteristics.
 
Source: SNL Financial, LC. and RP ® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.

Copyright (c) 2010 by RP ® Financial, LC.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.25
ratios at the top of the super range reflected a premium of 0.7% and a discount of 9.9%, respectively. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/B and P/TB ratios, the Company’s P/B and P/TB ratios at the top of the super range reflected a premium of 2.1% and a discount of 13.4%, respectively. RP Financial considered the discounts under the P/B approach to be reasonable given the Company’s pro forma P/E multiples were at significant premiums to the Peer Group’s P/E multiples.
     4.  Price-to-Assets (“P/A”) . The P/A valuation methodology determines market value by applying a valuation P/A ratio to the Company’s pro forma asset base, conservatively assuming no deposit withdrawals are made to fund stock purchases. In all likelihood there will be deposit withdrawals, which results in understating the pro forma P/A ratio which is computed herein. At the $223.4 million midpoint of the valuation range, the Company’s value equaled 12.99% of pro forma assets. Comparatively, the Peer Group companies exhibited an average P/A ratio of 10.94%, which implies a premium of 18.7% has been applied to the Company’s pro forma P/A ratio. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/A ratio of 9.74%, the Company’s pro forma P/A ratio at the midpoint value reflects a premium of 33.4%.
Comparison to Recent Offerings
     As indicated at the beginning of this chapter, RP Financial’s analysis of recent conversion offering pricing characteristics at closing and in the aftermarket has been limited to a “technical” analysis and, thus, the pricing characteristics of recent conversion offerings can not be a primary determinate of value. Particular focus was placed on the P/TB approach in this analysis, since the P/E multiples do not reflect the actual impact of reinvestment and the source of the stock proceeds (i.e., external funds vs. deposit withdrawals). As discussed previously, six second-step conversions have been completed within the past three months and closed at an average pro forma price/tangible book ratio of 79.1% (see Table 4.1) and, on average, decreased 2.3% from their IPO prices during the first week of trading. In comparison, the Company’s pro forma price/tangible book ratio at the appraised midpoint value reflects a premium of 1.1%. The current average P/TB ratio of the six recent second-step conversions based on closing stock prices as of August 26, 2010, equaled 75.1%. In comparison to the average current P/TB ratio of the six recent second-step conversions, the Company’s P/TB ratio at the midpoint value reflects an implied premium of 6.4% and at the top of the super range the Company’s P/TB ratio reflects an implied premium of 24.6%.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.26
Valuation Conclusion
     Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of August 26, 2010, the estimated aggregate pro forma valuation of the shares of the Company to be issued and outstanding at the end of the conversion offering — including (1) newly-issued shares representing the MHC’s current ownership interest in the Company and (2) exchange shares issued to existing public shareholders of the Company — was $223,406,080 at the midpoint, equal to 22,340,608 shares at a per share value of $10.00. The resulting range of value and pro forma shares, all based on $10.00 per share, are as follows: $189,895,170 or 18,989,517 shares at the minimum; $256,917,000, or 25,691,700 shares at the maximum; and $295,454,550 or 29,545,455 shares, at the supermaximum (also known as “maximum, as adjusted”).
     Based on this valuation and taking into account the ownership interest represented by the shares owned by the MHC, the midpoint of the offering range is $130,000,000, equal to 13,000,000 shares at $10.00 per share. The resulting offering range and offering shares, all based on $10.00 per share, are as follows: $110,500,000, or 11,050,000 shares, at the minimum; $149,500,000 or 14,950,000 shares at the maximum; and $171,925,000 or 17,192,500 shares, at the supermaximum. The pro forma valuation calculations relative to the Peer Group are shown in Table 4.3 and are detailed in Exhibit IV-7 and Exhibit IV-8.
Establishment of the Exchange Ratio
     OTS regulations provide that in a conversion of a mutual holding company, the minority stockholders are entitled to exchange the public shares for newly issued shares in the fully converted company. The Board of Directors of Rockville Financial has independently determined the exchange ratio, which has been designed to preserve the current aggregate percentage ownership in the Company held by the public shareholders, taking into account the impact of MHC assets in the Second Step Conversion, consistent with FDIC policy with respect to the treatment of MHC assets. The exchange ratio to be received by the existing minority shareholders of the Company will be determined at the end of the offering, based on the total number of shares sold in the subscription and syndicated offerings and the final appraisal.

 


 

     
RP ® Financial, LC.   VALUATION ANALYSIS
    IV.27
                                 
                    Exchange Shares    
            Offering   Issued to the   Exchange
    Total Shares   Shares   Public Shareholders   Ratio
Shares
                            (x)
Super Maximum
    29,545,455       17,192,500       12,352,955       1.5131  
Maximum
    25,691,700       14,950,000       10,741,700       1.3158  
Midpoint
    22,340,608       13,000,000       9,340,608       1.1441  
Minimum
    18,989,517       11,050,000       7,939,517       0.9725  
 
                               
Distribution of Shares
                               
Super Maximum
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
Maximum
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
Midpoint
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
Minimum
    100.00 %     58.19 %     41.81 %        
 
                               
Aggregate Market Value(1)
                               
Super Maximum
  $ 295,454,550     $ 171,925,000     $ 123,529,550          
Maximum
  $ 256,917,000     $ 149,500,000     $ 107,417,000          
Midpoint
  $ 223,406,080     $ 130,000,000     $ 93,406,080          
Minimum
  $ 189,895,170     $ 110,500,000     $ 79,395,170          
 
(1)   Based on offering price of $10.00 per share.
 
Note:   Valuation and ownership ratios reflect dilutive impact of MHC assets upon completion of the Second Step Conversion.
     Based on the valuation conclusion herein, the resulting offering value and the $10.00 per share offering price, the indicated exchange ratio at the midpoint is 1.1441 shares of the Company for every one public share held by public shareholders. Furthermore, based on the offering range of value, the indicated exchange ratio is 0.9725 at the minimum, 1.3158 at the maximum and 1.5131 at the supermaximum. RP Financial expresses no opinion on the proposed exchange of newly issued Company shares for the shares held by the public stockholders or on the proposed exchange ratio.