EXHIBIT 99.3
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
1
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Partners Capital and Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
6
|
|
SCHEDULE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Schedule III Summary of Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
28
|
|
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited)
|
|
|
31
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
33
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Partners Capital and Comprehensive Income for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
35
|
|
All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is
included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Partners
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Dominion Realty, L.P.
(the Partnership) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners capital and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
Schedule III Real Estate Owned. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of
the Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting
as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Denver, Colorado
September 30, 2010
1
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment
|
|
$
|
3,640,888
|
|
|
$
|
3,569,239
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(717,892
|
)
|
|
|
(552,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
2,922,996
|
|
|
|
3,016,870
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
Notes receivable due from third party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
|
|
22,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,961,067
|
|
|
$
|
3,254,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
$
|
851,901
|
|
Note payable due to General Partner
|
|
|
71,547
|
|
|
|
86,249
|
|
Real estate taxes payable
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
|
|
8,259
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Security deposits and prepaid rent
|
|
|
13,728
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
Distributions payable
|
|
|
32,642
|
|
|
|
214,307
|
|
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property
|
|
|
63,838
|
|
|
|
63,838
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
|
|
|
25,872
|
|
|
|
33,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,339,319
|
|
|
|
1,272,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating partnership units: 179,909,408 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2009
(166,163,187 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2008):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partner: 110,883 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2009
(102,410 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
Limited partners: 179,798,525 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2009
(166,060,777 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2,199,450
|
|
|
|
2,349,247
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(3,153
|
)
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
2,197,753
|
|
|
|
2,345,825
|
|
Receivable due from General Partner
|
|
|
(588,185
|
)
|
|
|
(375,124
|
)
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
12,180
|
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
|
|
1,621,748
|
|
|
|
1,982,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and capital
|
|
$
|
2,961,067
|
|
|
$
|
3,254,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
353,056
|
|
|
$
|
336,674
|
|
|
$
|
297,094
|
|
Non-property income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
13,106
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
358,751
|
|
|
|
349,780
|
|
|
|
297,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance
|
|
|
43,031
|
|
|
|
38,939
|
|
|
|
34,630
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
27,344
|
|
|
|
26,591
|
|
|
|
23,689
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
17,236
|
|
|
|
15,667
|
|
|
|
14,427
|
|
Repair and maintenance
|
|
|
17,355
|
|
|
|
17,231
|
|
|
|
15,311
|
|
Administrative and marketing
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
|
|
7,394
|
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
9,709
|
|
|
|
9,259
|
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
4,868
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166,773
|
|
|
|
154,584
|
|
|
|
115,806
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on secured debt
|
|
|
48,519
|
|
|
|
41,643
|
|
|
|
31,335
|
|
Interest on note payable due to General Partner
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
16,886
|
|
|
|
19,081
|
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
364,271
|
|
|
|
340,144
|
|
|
|
279,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from operations
|
|
|
(5,520
|
)
|
|
|
9,636
|
|
|
|
17,937
|
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property to a joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(5,520
|
)
|
|
|
9,636
|
|
|
|
116,370
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
489,272
|
|
|
|
78,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss)/income
|
|
|
(4,045
|
)
|
|
|
498,908
|
|
|
|
194,430
|
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
497,720
|
|
|
$
|
193,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per OP unit- basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from continuing operations attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
(Loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average OP units outstanding
|
|
|
178,817
|
|
|
|
166,163
|
|
|
|
166,174
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss)/income
|
|
$
|
(4,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
498,908
|
|
|
$
|
194,430
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166,773
|
|
|
|
154,911
|
|
|
|
158,863
|
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property
|
|
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
|
(475,249
|
)
|
|
|
(143,408
|
)
|
Write off of bad debt
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets
|
|
|
(3,340
|
)
|
|
|
(3,463
|
)
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
Decrease in operating liabilities
|
|
|
(4,991
|
)
|
|
|
(9,652
|
)
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
157,333
|
|
|
|
168,660
|
|
|
|
212,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate investments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879,930
|
|
|
|
404,240
|
|
Proceeds from note receivable
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of real estate assets (net of liabilities assumed) and initial capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(713,649
|
)
|
|
|
(236,944
|
)
|
Capital expenditures and other major improvements real estate assets,
net of escrow reimbursement
|
|
|
(70,372
|
)
|
|
|
(84,288
|
)
|
|
|
(92,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
129,628
|
|
|
|
81,993
|
|
|
|
75,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments and distributions to UDR, Inc.
|
|
|
(550,392
|
)
|
|
|
(319,478
|
)
|
|
|
(150,162
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt
|
|
|
340,608
|
|
|
|
292,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on secured debt
|
|
|
(64,455
|
)
|
|
|
(204,205
|
)
|
|
|
(125,886
|
)
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(4,073
|
)
|
|
|
(3,639
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Contributions from limited partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Repurchase of Out-Performance Partnership Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
Distributions paid to non-affiliated partnership unitholders
|
|
|
(11,797
|
)
|
|
|
(11,424
|
)
|
|
|
(11,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(290,109
|
)
|
|
|
(247,150
|
)
|
|
|
(287,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,148
|
)
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
|
$
|
3,590
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the year, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
46,029
|
|
|
$
|
41,929
|
|
|
$
|
42,918
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of note receivable upon the disposition of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Secured debt assumed at acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,705
|
|
|
|
36,193
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
|
Out-Performance
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Receivable due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Limited
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
from General
|
|
|
Non-Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
51,430
|
|
|
$
|
204,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,947,905
|
|
|
$
|
1,391
|
|
|
$
|
52,464
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,257,406
|
|
|
$
|
(257,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,119
|
|
|
$
|
2,009,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(2,150
|
)
|
|
|
(7,265
|
)
|
|
|
(197,733
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances- Series E OPPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPPS Unit Conversion- Series A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,451
|
)
|
|
|
27,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of community to UDR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reflect limited partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
(19,155
|
)
|
|
|
(86,875
|
)
|
|
|
106,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net and comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
6,722
|
|
|
|
182,943
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
1,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
194,430
|
|
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
32,114
|
|
|
|
139,660
|
|
|
|
2,057,267
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,232,404
|
|
|
|
(254,256
|
)
|
|
|
10,861
|
|
|
|
1,989,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(3,719
|
)
|
|
|
(13,067
|
)
|
|
|
(361,879
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,136
|
)
|
|
|
29,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reflect limited partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
(10,949
|
)
|
|
|
(35,863
|
)
|
|
|
46,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
17,091
|
|
|
|
475,458
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
498,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
17,091
|
|
|
|
475,458
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
492,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
494,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
22,310
|
|
|
|
78,685
|
|
|
|
2,246,794
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
2,345,825
|
|
|
|
(375,124
|
)
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
|
1,982,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(3,600
|
)
|
|
|
(146,954
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of OP Units through Special Dividend
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,359
|
|
|
|
153,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures- OPPS units
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,308
|
)
|
|
|
23,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reflect limited partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
7,274
|
|
|
|
12,218
|
|
|
|
(19,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(4,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
(2,455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(2,324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(366,672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(366,672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
28,797
|
|
|
$
|
69,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,101,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,153
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,197,753
|
|
|
$
|
(588,185
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,180
|
|
|
$
|
1,621,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization and formation
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (UDR, L.P., the Operating Partnership, we or our) is a
Delaware limited partnership, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, redevelops, manages, and
disposes of multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets
located in the United States. The high barrier-to-entry markets are characterized by limited land
for new construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement process, expensive single-family home
prices and significant employment growth potential. UDR, L.P. is a subsidiary of UDR, Inc. (UDR
or the General Partner) , a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
and through which UDR conducts a significant portion of its business. During the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, revenues of the Operating Partnership represented of 58%, 59%,
and 59% of the General Partners consolidated revenues. At December 31, 2009, the Operating
Partnerships apartment portfolio consisted of 81 communities located in 19 markets consisting of
23,351 apartment homes.
Interests in UDR, L.P. are represented by Operating Partnership Units (OP Units). The
Operating Partnerships net income is allocated to the partners, which is initially based on their
respective distributions made during the year and secondly, their percentage interests.
Distributions are made in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership Agreement), on a
per unit basis that is generally equal to the dividend per share on UDRs common stock, which is
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol UDR.
There were 179,909,408 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding as of December 31,
2009 of which, 173,922,816 or 96.7% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 5,986,592 or
3.3%, which were owned by non-affiliated limited partners. As of December 31, 2008, there were
166,163,187 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which, 158,839,408 or 95.6% were
owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 7,323,779 or 4.4%, which were owned by non-affiliated
limited partners. See Note 9,
Capital Structure
.
As sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, UDR owned 110,883 and 102,410 general
partnership interest or .06% in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 179,798,525 and 166,060,777, respectively,
OP units outstanding of limited partnership interest, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815,
respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership OP units. UDR owned 173,811,933 or 96.7% and
158,736,998 or 95.5% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining 5,986,592 or 3.3%
and 7,323,779 or 4.4% OP units outstanding of limited partnership interest were held by non-
affiliated partners at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815,
respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership units.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements consists of the Operating Partnership and
its subsidiaries. Profits and losses are allocated in accordance with the terms of the Operating
Partnership agreement. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(SFAS 168). Effective for our financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods commencing with the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (Codification or ASC) is the source of authoritative
U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all then-existing, non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards. In the FASBs view, the Codification does not change GAAP, and therefore the
adoption of SFAS 168, now referred to as FASB ASC 105,
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
,
did not have an effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
However, where we have referred to specific authoritative accounting literature, both the
Codification and pre-Codification GAAP literature are disclosed.
6
FASB ASC 810,
Consolidation
(formerly SFAS 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements- an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin 51 (Consolidated Financial
Statements) establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling (minority)
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. Consolidated net income should include the net income for both the parent and the
non-controlling interest with disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of
operations. The Operating Partnership adopted this standard, effective January 1, 2009. There was
no impact to net loss attributable to unit holders.
FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(formerly SFAS 157, Fair Value
Instruments and FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157) (Topic 820) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. Topic 820 applies to
other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements but does not require
any new fair value measurements. The adoption of Topic 820 for financial assets and liabilities,
as of January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on our financial position or operations.
Topic 820 delayed the effective date of Topic 820s fair value measurement requirements for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value
on a recurring basis. Fair value measurements identified in Topic 820 was effective for our
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
FASB ASC 805,
Business Combinations
(formerly SFAS 141R, Business Combinations) became
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This standard establishes principles
and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquiree. This standard also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the
goodwill acquired in the business combination, recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed
arising from contingencies, and determining what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The
adoption of this guidance could materially impact our future consolidated financial position and
results of operations depending on UDR, L.P.s acquisition activity as certain acquisition costs
that have historically been capitalized as part of the basis of the real estate and amortized over
the real estates useful life will now be expensed as incurred. This guidance did not have a
material impact on our financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2009.
FASB ASC 815,
Derivatives
(formerly SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133) (Topic 815), effective for our
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009, presents disclosure requirements to enhance the financial
statement users understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Topic 815 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The standard did not have any impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, it requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative
disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures
about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments. See Note 8,
Derivative and
Hedging Activity,
for these additional disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS
167), which (1) addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity
concept from ASC 860,
Transfers and Servicing
(formerly SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities), and (2) responds to concerns
about the application of certain key provisions of ASC 810,
Consolidation
(formerly FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities), including concerns over
the transparency of enterprises involvement with variable interest entities. SFAS 167 is effective
beginning on January 1, 2010. The Operating Partnership does not expect a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as a result of the new
guidance.
7
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, Measuring
Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-05), which provides amendments to Topic 820. ASU 2009-05
provides additional guidance clarifying the measurement of liabilities at fair value. ASU 2009-05
was effective in the fourth quarter 2009 for a calendar year entity. This guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during
the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Operating Partnership adopted certain accounting guidance within ASC Topic 740,
Income
Taxes
, with respect to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the financial statements. The guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Operating Partnerships tax
returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the
applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would
be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management of the Operating
Partnership is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations,
for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. The Operating Partnership
has no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.
Management of the Operating Partnership has reviewed all open tax years and major
jurisdictions and concluded the adoption of the new accounting guidance resulted in no impact to
the Operating Partnerships financial position or results of operations. There is no tax liability
resulting from unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain income tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in future tax returns.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts realized or paid could differ
from those estimates. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current financial statement presentation.
Discontinued operations
For properties accounted for under FASB ASC 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment
(formerly
SFAS
144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets) (Topic 360), the results
of operations for those properties sold during the year or classified as held-for-sale at the end
of the current year are classified as discontinued operations in the current and prior periods.
Further, to meet the discontinued operations criteria, the Operating Partnership or related parties
will not have any significant continuing involvement in the ownership or operation of the property
after the sale or disposition. Once a property is deemed as held-for-sale, depreciation is no
longer recorded. However, if the Operating Partnership determines that the property no longer meets
the criteria for held-for-sale, the Company will recapture any unrecorded depreciation on the
property (see Note 4,
Discontinued Operations
for further discussion).
Real estate
Real estate assets held for investment are carried at historical cost and consist of land,
buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment and other costs incurred during their
development, acquisition and redevelopment.
Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to the acquisition and/or
improvement of real estate assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives
if the expenditures qualify as a betterment or the life of the related asset will be substantially
extended beyond the original life expectancy.
The Operating Partnership purchases real estate investment properties and allocates the
purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated
fair value. The primary, although not only, identifiable intangible asset associated with our
portfolio is the value of existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired community,
we first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then
to the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the community is vacant. The
Operating Partnership estimates the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the
lost revenue associated with a hypothetical lease-up. Depreciation on the building is based on the
expected useful life of the asset and the in-place leases are amortized over their remaining
contractual life.
8
Quarterly or when changes in circumstances warrant, UDR, L.P. will assess our real estate
portfolio for indicators of impairment. In determining whether the Operating Partnership has
indicators of impairment in our real estate assets, we assess whether the long-lived assets
carrying value exceeds the communitys undiscounted future cash flows, which is representative of
projected NOI plus the residual value of the community. Our future cash flow estimates are based
upon historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating
conditions and our estimated holding periods. If such indicators of impairment are present and the
carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of the community, an impairment loss is
recognized equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.
Our estimates of fair market value represent our best estimate based upon industry trends and
reference to market rates and transactions.
For long-lived assets to be disposed of, impairment losses are recognized when the fair value
of the asset less estimated cost to sell is less than the carrying value of the asset. Properties
classified as real estate held for disposition generally represent properties that are actively
marketed or contracted for sale with the closing expected to occur within the next twelve months.
Real estate held for disposition is carried at the lower of cost, net of accumulated depreciation,
or fair value, less the cost to dispose, determined on an asset-by-asset basis. Expenditures for
ordinary repair and maintenance costs on held for disposition properties are charged to expense as
incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to held for
disposition properties are capitalized at cost. Depreciation is not recorded on real estate held
for disposition.
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets which are 35 years for buildings, 10 to 35 years for major improvements, and 3 to 10
years for furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other assets. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
value of our net intangible assets which are reflected in Other assets was $4.8 million and $6.4
million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the value of our net intangible
liabilities which are reflected in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities was
$3.6 million and $3.8 million in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balances are being amortized
over the remaining life of the respective intangible.
All development and redevelopment projects and related carrying costs are capitalized during
periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in
progress. As each building in a project is completed and becomes available for lease-up, the
Operating Partnership ceases capitalization and the assets are depreciated over their estimated
useful lives. The costs of projects which include interest, real estate taxes, insurance, and
allocated development overhead related to support costs for personnel working directly on the
development site are capitalized during the construction period. During 2009, 2008, and 2007, total
interest capitalized pertaining to redevelopment projects and land held for future development was
$444,000, $580,000, and $1.0 million, respectively.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and demand deposits with financial
institutions. Restricted cash consists of escrow deposits held by lenders for real estate taxes,
insurance and replacement reserves, and security deposits.
Derivative financial instruments
The General Partner utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and
will generally designate these financial instruments as a cash flow hedge. Derivative financial
instruments associated with the Operating Partnerships allocation of the General Partners debt
are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability and measured
quarterly at their fair value. The changes in fair value for the General Partners cash flow hedges
allocated to the Operating Partnership that are deemed effective are reflected in other
comprehensive income and for non-designated derivative financial instruments in earnings. For cash
flow hedges the ineffective component, if any, is recorded in earnings.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income, which is defined as all changes in capital during each period except for
those resulting from investments by or distributions to partners, is displayed in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Partners Capital and Comprehensive Income. For the year ended December
31, 2009, other comprehensive income consisted of the change in the fair value of the General
Partners effective cash flow hedges that are allocated to the Operating Partnership.
9
Income Taxes
The taxable income or loss of the Operating Partnership is reported in the tax returns of the
partners. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes. The
Partnerships tax returns are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Net
income for financial reporting purposes differs from the net income for income tax reporting
purposes primarily due to temporary differences, principally real estate depreciation and the tax
deferral of certain gains on property sales. The differences in depreciation result from
differences in the book and tax basis of certain real estate assets and the differences in the
methods of depreciation and lives of the real estate assets.
Revenue and real estate sales gain recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in
accordance with FASB ASC 840,
Leases
(formerly SFAS 13 Accounting for Leases) and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Rental payments are generally due on a monthly
basis and recognized when earned. The Operating Partnership recognizes interest income, management
and other fees and incentives when earned, fixed and determinable.
The Operating Partnership accounts for sales of real estate in accordance with FASB ASC
360-20,
Real Estate Sales
(formerly SFAS 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate). For sale
transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as the Operating
Partnership no longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the related assets
and liabilities from our Consolidated Balance Sheets and record the gain or loss in the period the
transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to
our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for
the transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales to entities in which we or our General Partner retain or otherwise own an interest are
accounted for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full
accrual method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we
recognize profit proportionate to the outside interest in the buyer and will defer the gain on the
interest we or our General Partner retain. The Operating Partnership will recognize any deferred
gain when the property is then sold to a third party. In transactions accounted by us as partial
sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority equity interest in the venture was provided a
preference as to cash flows in either an operating or a capital waterfall. If a cash flow
preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the extent that proceeds from the sale of
the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the entire property.
Earnings per Operating Partnership Unit
Basic earnings per OP Unit is computed by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to general
and limited partner unitholders by the weighted average number of general and limited partner units
(including redeemable OP Units) outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per OP Unit reflects
the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue OP Units were
exercised or converted into OP Units or resulted in the issuance of OP Units and then shared in the
earnings of the Operating Partnership. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, there
were no dilutive instruments, and therefore, diluted earnings per OP Unit and basic earnings per OP
Unit are the same.
Non-controlling interests
The noncontrolling interests represent the General Partners interests in certain consolidated
subsidiaries and are presented in the capital section of the consolidated balance sheets since
these interests are not convertible or redeemable into any other ownership interests of the
Operating Partnership.
Advertising costs
All advertising costs are expensed as incurred and reported on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations within the line item Administrative and marketing. During 2009, 2008, and 2007, total
advertising expense from continuing and discontinued operations was $2.4 million, $2.6 million, and
$4.5 million, respectively.
10
Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The Operating Partnership is charged directly with general and administrative expenses it
incurs. The Operating Partnership is also charged with other general and administrative expenses
that have been allocated by the General Partner to each of its subsidiaries, including the
Operating Partnership, based on each subsidiarys pro-rata portion of UDRs total apartment homes.
(See Note 6,
Related Party Transactions
.)
Market concentration risk
Approximately 20.9%, 15.7% and 14.2% of our apartment communities are located in Orange
County, California, Metropolitan Washington DC, and San Francisco, California, respectively, based
on the carrying value of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Therefore, the
Partnership is subject to increased exposure (positive or negative) from economic and other
competitive factors specific to those markets.
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Operating Partnership consists of income producing operating
properties and land held for future development. As of December 31, 2009, the Operating
Partnership owned and consolidated 81 communities in 8 states plus the District of Columbia
totaling 23,351 apartment homes. The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for our real
estate owned (at cost) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
(dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
985,126
|
|
|
$
|
980,648
|
|
Depreciable property held and used
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
2,525,812
|
|
|
|
2,470,213
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and
equipment
|
|
|
108,094
|
|
|
|
95,872
|
|
Land held for future development
|
|
|
21,856
|
|
|
|
22,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate
|
|
|
3,640,888
|
|
|
|
3,569,239
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(717,892
|
)
|
|
|
(552,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate, net
|
|
$
|
2,922,996
|
|
|
$
|
3,016,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The Operating Partnership did not have any acquisitions during the year ended December 31,
2009. The following table summarizes the Operating Partnerships real estate community acquisitions
for the year ended December 31, 2008
(dollar amounts in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Market
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Price (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dulaney Crescent
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
57,690
|
|
Delancey at Shirlington Village
|
|
Metro D.C.
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Edgewater
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
Circle Towers
|
|
Metro D.C.
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
138,378
|
(b)
|
Legacy Village
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
118,500
|
|
Pine Brook Village II
|
|
Orange County, CA
|
|
May 2008
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
87,320
|
|
Hearthstone at Merrill Creek
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
May 2008
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
Island Square
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
112,202
|
|
Almaden Lake Village
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
47,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
$
|
799,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The purchase price is the contractual amount paid by UDR LP to the third party and does not include
any costs that the Operating Partnership incurred in the pursuit of the property.
|
|
(b)
|
|
The purchase price does not include the $5.9 million of commercial space acquired in the
transaction.
|
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The results of operations for properties sold during the year or designated as held-for-sale
at the end of the year are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Properties classified as real estate held for disposition generally represent properties that are
actively marketed or contracted for sale with the closing expected to occur within the next twelve
months. The application of ASC Topic 360 does not have an impact on net income attributable to
unit holders. The application of ASC Topic 360 results in the reclassification of the operating
results of all properties sold or classified as held for disposition through December 31, 2009,
within the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007, and the reclassification of the assets and liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, if applicable.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership did not dispose of any
communities. At December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership did not have any assets that met the
criteria to be included in discontinued operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Operating Partnership sold 55 communities and
recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $475.2 million on these sales. At December 31,
2008, UDR L.P. did not have any assets that met the criteria to be included in discontinued
operations. In conjunction with the sale of these communities, the Operating Partnership received a
$200.0 million note (outstanding at December 31, 2008). The note which is secured by a pledge,
security agreement and a guarantee from the buyers parent entity bears a fixed rate of interest
of 7.5% per annum and matures on March 31, 2014, provided however that the master credit facility
agreement pursuant to which the buyer financed the acquisition of the properties provides that the
buyer will pay or prepay the note on or before the date that is fourteen (14) months after the
Initial Closing Date (May 3, 2009) and further that it is an event of default under the master
credit facility agreement if the note is not paid in full by June 1, 2009. The Operating
Partnership received full payment of the note during the year ended December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Operating Partnership sold 12 communities and
recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $143.4 million on these sales, of which $45.0
million is included in discontinued operations. The remaining $98.4 million of gains recognized,
related to the sale of seven additional communities to a joint venture in which the General Partner
holds a 20% interest, and is reported as a component of continuing operations. The results of
operations for the properties classified as discontinued operations and the interest expense
associated with the secured debt on these properties are classified on the Consolidated Statements
of Operations in the line item entitled Income from discontinued operations.
12
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the years ended December
31,
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,338
|
|
|
$
|
148,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,150
|
|
|
|
55,975
|
|
Property management fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
4,073
|
|
Real estate depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,727
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
11,912
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,315
|
|
|
|
115,020
|
|
Income before net gain on the sale
of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,023
|
|
|
|
33,084
|
|
Net gain on the sale of property
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
475,249
|
|
|
|
44,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
1,475
|
|
|
$
|
489,272
|
|
|
$
|
78,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of
classification in the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Operating Partnership
having effectively established the interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured debt
consists of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (
dollars in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Communities
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Years to Maturity
|
|
|
Encumbered
|
|
Fixed Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
$
|
230,852
|
|
|
$
|
289,366
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
587,403
|
|
|
|
396,154
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate secured debt
|
|
|
831,580
|
|
|
|
698,845
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
|
|
37,415
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Tax-exempt secured note payable
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
163,028
|
|
|
|
88,641
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate secured debt
|
|
|
290,618
|
|
|
|
153,056
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured debt
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
$
|
851,901
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, the General Partner has secured revolving credit facilities with
Fannie Mae (FNMA) with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The
Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and
fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at
the General Partners option. There is $950.0 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted
average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance of $249.1 million on these facilities is
currently at a weighted average variable rate of 1.7%. There is $750.4 million and $484.8 million
of these credit facilities that are allocated to the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively, based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding
|
|
$
|
750,431
|
|
|
$
|
484,795
|
|
Weighted average borrowings during the period
ended
|
|
|
646,895
|
|
|
|
409,823
|
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended
|
|
|
750,572
|
|
|
|
484,920
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during the
period ended
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Weighted average interest rate at the end of
the period
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
The General Partner will from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt
instruments. In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair
value and amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life
of the underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair value adjustment of the fixed rate debt
instruments on the Operating Partnerships properties was a net discount of $1.2 million and
$1.1 million at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable.
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from February 2011 through June
2016 and carry interest rates ranging from 5.03% to 5.94%.
Tax-exempt secured notes payable.
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt
housing bond issues mature in March 2031 and carry an interest rate of 5.30%. Interest on these
notes is payable in semi-annual installments.
Secured credit facilities.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the General Partner had borrowings
against its fixed rate facilities of $950.0 million and $666.6 million, respectively, of which
$587.4 million and $396.2 million, respectively, were allocated to the Operating Partnership based
on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of December 31, 2009, the fixed rate Fannie
Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted average fixed rate of
interest of 5.30%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable.
Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from July 2013 through April
2016. The mortgage notes payable interest is based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which translate
into interest rates ranging from 1.12% to 3.87% at December 31, 2009.
Tax-exempt secured note payable.
The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures
tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly
installments. The mortgage note payable has an interest rate of 1.36% as of December 31, 2009.
Secured credit facilities.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the General Partner had borrowings
against its variable rate facilities of $249.1 million and $164.5 million, respectively, of which
$163.0 million and $88.6 million, respectively, were allocated to the Operating Partnership based
on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of December 31, 2009, the variable rate
borrowings under the Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a
weighted average floating rate of interest of 1.99%.
14
The aggregate maturities of the Operating Partnerships secured debt due during each of the
next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Tax Exempt
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,584
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,584
|
|
2011
|
|
|
47,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,243
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,641
|
|
|
|
112,384
|
|
2012
|
|
|
49,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,849
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,203
|
|
|
|
225,462
|
|
2013
|
|
|
61,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,723
|
|
|
|
38,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,340
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
69,862
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
398,588
|
|
|
|
60,829
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
86,184
|
|
|
|
655,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
230,852
|
|
|
$
|
13,325
|
|
|
$
|
587,403
|
|
|
$
|
100,590
|
|
|
$
|
27,000
|
|
|
$
|
163,028
|
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor to Unsecured Debt
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partners unsecured credit facility,
with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At December
31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $189.3 million.
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Receivable due from the General Partner
The Operating Partnership participates in the General Partners central cash management
program, wherein all the Operating Partnerships cash receipts are remitted to the General Partner
and all cash disbursements are funded by the General Partner. In addition, other miscellaneous
costs such as administrative expenses are incurred by the General Partner on behalf of the
Operating Partnership. As a result of these various transactions between the Operating Partnership
and the General Partner, the Operating Partnership had a net receivable balance of $588.2 million
and $375.1 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction in
capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The General Partner performs various general and administrative and other overhead services
for the Operating Partnership including legal assistance, acquisitions analysis, marketing and
advertising, and allocates these expenses to the Operating Partnership first on the basis of direct
usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated based on its pro-rata portion of UDRs total
apartment homes. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the general and
administrative expenses allocated to the Operating Partnership by UDR were $25.9 million, $28.9
million, and $34.9 million, respectively, and are included in General and Administrative expenses
of the consolidated statements of operations. In the opinion of management, this method of
allocation reflects the level of services received from the General Partner.
Guaranty by the General Partner
The General Partner provided a bottom dollar guaranty to certain limited partners as part of
their original contribution to the Operating Partnership. The guaranty protects the tax basis of
the underlying contribution and is reflected on the OP unitholders Schedule K-1 tax form. The
guaranty was made in the form of a loan from the General Partner to the Operating Partnership at an
annual interest rate of 5.83% at December 31, 2009 and 2008. Interest payments are made monthly and
the note is due December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the note payable due to the
General Partner was $71.5 million and $86.2 million, respectively.
15
7. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, UDR adopted FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value of Measurements and
Disclosures
(formerly SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements) (Topic 820), which defines fair value
based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price that would be paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable
inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which
are described below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
entity has the ability to access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated with observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes
certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use
significant unobservable inputs.
|
At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, notes receivable, accounts receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable,
accrued interest payable, security deposits and prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts
payable approximated their carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments.
The estimated fair values of other financial instruments were determined by the Operating
Partnership using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values.
Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the
Operating Partnership would realize on the disposition of the financial instruments. The use of
different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
The Operating Partnership adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 825,
Financial Instruments
(formerly FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments) on June 30, 2009, which require disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments in interim as well as annual financial statements. The carrying
amounts and estimated fair value of the financial instruments that are allocated to the Operating
Partnership, where different, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows
(dollars
in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt (a)
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
$
|
1,136,755
|
|
|
$
|
851,901
|
|
|
$
|
827,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(3,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
See Note 5, Debt
|
|
(b)
|
|
See Note 8, Derivatives and Hedging Activity
|
We estimate the fair value of our fixed rate debt instruments by discounting the remaining
cash flows of the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market credit spread
plus the corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a replacement market
credit spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit spreads, and time
remaining to maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
The General Partner has derivative contracts that are measured and recognized at fair value
using the Topic 820 hierarchy. The Operating Partnership is allocated a portion of the derivatives
consistent with the allocation of the underlying debt. The derivative contracts are recorded in
Other assets and in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets for $2.0 million and $3.8 million, and $33,000 and $4.9 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
16
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected
variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate
curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard
methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest
rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation
of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from
observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
To comply with the provisions of ASC Topic 820, the Operating Partnership incorporates credit
valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of
its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Operating Partnership has
considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral
postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Operating Partnership has determined that the majority of the inputs used to
value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation
adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current
credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as
of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership has assessed the significance of the impact of the
credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has
determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of
its derivatives. As a result, the Operating Partnership has determined that its derivative
valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The General Partner is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and
economic conditions. The General Partner principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of
business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The General
Partner manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by
managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative
financial instruments. Specifically, the General Partner enters into derivative financial
instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or
payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest
rates. The General Partners derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the
amount, timing, and duration of the General Partners known or expected cash receipts and its known
or expected cash payments principally related to the General Partners investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The General Partners objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to
interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this
objective, the General Partner primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the
receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the General Partner making
fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional
amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in
exchange for an up front premium.
A portion of the General Partners interest rate derivatives have been allocated to the
Operating Partnership based on the General Partners underlying debt instruments allocated to the
Operating Partnership. (See Note 5,
Debt.
)
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the
variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the
change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership recorded less than $1,000 of ineffectiveness in
earnings attributable to reset date and index mismatches between the derivative and the hedged
item.
Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) related to derivatives
will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the General Partners
variable-rate debt that is allocated to the Operating Partnership. During the year ended December
31, 2009, we estimate that an additional $4.1 million will be reclassified as an increase to
interest expense.
17
As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership had the following outstanding interest rate
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (
dollar amounts in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
218,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
86,180
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Companys
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements of FASB ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
(formerly SFAS 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities). Changes in the fair value of derivatives not
designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in a gain of
$538,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, we had the following
outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships
(
dollar amounts in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
244,194
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as
their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009.
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments (amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
1,046
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not
designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
not
designated as hedging instruments under
Topic 815
|
|
|
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The tables below present the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 (
dollar amounts in
thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
Derivatives in Topic 815
|
|
Recognized in OCI on
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into
|
|
Cash Flow Hedging
|
|
Derivative (Effective
|
|
|
Income (Effective
|
|
|
Income (Effective
|
|
Relationships
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
$
|
(2,676
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(4,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(2,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
Hedging Instruments Under
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Income on
|
|
Topic 815
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other income / (expense)
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The General Partner has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a
provision where (1) if the General Partner defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default
where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the General
Partner could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the General Partner
could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying
indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the General Partners default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the General Partner s agreements with its derivative counterparties contain
provisions where if there is a change in the General Partners financial condition that materially
changes the General Partner s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the General Partner may be
required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The General Partner also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the
loan and financial covenant provisions of the General Partners indebtedness with a lender
affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would
result in the General Partner being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by
the agreement.
As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position that were
allocated to the Operating Partnership, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment
for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $5.1 million. As of December 31, 2009, the
General Partner has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the General Partner
had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2009, it would have been required to settle
its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $5.1 million.
19
9. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
General Partnership Units
The General Partner has complete discretion to manage and control the operations and business
of the Operating Partnership, which includes but is not limited to the acquisition and disposition
of real property, construction of buildings and making capital improvements, and the borrowing of
funds from outside lenders or UDR and its subsidiaries to finance such activities. The General
Partner can authorize, issue, sell, redeem or purchase any OP unit or securities of the Operating
Partnership without the approval of the limited partners. The General Partner can also approve,
with regard to the issuances of OP units, the class or one or more series of classes, with
designations, preferences, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties
including rights, powers and duties senior to limited partnership interests without approval of any
limited partners. There were 110,883 and 102,410 of general partnership interest at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively, all of which were held by UDR.
Limited Partnership Units
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 179,798,525 and 166,060,777, respectively, OP units
outstanding of limited partnership interest, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815, respectively, were
Class A Limited Partnership OP units. UDR owned 173,811,933 or 96.7% and 158,736,998 or 95.6% at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining 5,986,592 or 3.3% and 7,323,779 or 4.4% OP
units outstanding of limited partnership interest were held by non- affiliated partners at December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815, respectively, were Class A
Limited Partnership units.
The limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a
portion of the OP units held by the limited partner at a redemption price equal to and in the form
of the Cash Amount (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement), provided that such OP Units
have been outstanding for at least one year. UDR, as general partner of the Operating Partnership
may, in its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash
Amount or the REIT Share Amount (generally one share of common stock of UDR for each OP Unit), as
defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement. (Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the Operating
Partnership Agreement, redemptions related to the Series A Out-Performance Partnership Shares
[discussed below] were made on a one for 1.5091 during the period from December 27, 2007 to March
13, 2009.)
The non-affiliated limited partners capital is adjusted to redemption value at the end of
each reporting period with the corresponding offset against the UDR limited partner capital account
based on the redemption rights note above. The aggregate value upon redemption of the
then-outstanding OP units held by limited partners was $98.4 million, $101.0 million, and $171.8
million as of December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, based on the value of UDRs common
stock at each period end. Once each OP unit has been redeemed, the redeeming partner has no right
to receive any distributions from the Operating Partnership on or after the date of redemption.
Class A Limited Partnership Units
Class A Partnership units have a cumulative annual, non-compounded preferred return, which is
equal to 8% based on a value of $16.61 per Class A Limited Partnership Unit.
Holders of the Class A Limited Partnership units exclusively possess certain voting rights.
The Operating Partnership may not perform the following without approval of the holders of the
Class A Partnership units: (i) increase the authorized or issued amount of Class A Partnership
Units, (ii) reclassify any other partnership interest into Class A Partnership Units, (iii) create,
authorize or issue any obligations or security convertible into or the right to purchase any Class
Partnership Units, without the approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership units, (iv) enter
into a merger or acquisition, or (v) amend or modify the Operating Partnership Agreement that
affects the rights, preferences or privileges of the Class A Partnership Units.
Allocation of profits and losses
Profit of the Operating Partnership is allocated in the following order: (i) to the General
Partner and the Limited Partners in proportion to and up to the amount of cash distributions made
during the year, and (ii) to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their
percentage interests. Losses and depreciation and amortization expenses, non-recourse liabilities
are allocated to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage
interests. Losses allocated to the Limited Partners are capped to the extent that such an
allocation would not cause a deficit in the Limited Partners capital account. Such losses are,
therefore, allocated to the General Partner. If any Partners capital balance were to fall
into a deficit any income and gains are allocated to each Partner sufficient to eliminate its
negative capital balance.
20
Out-Performance Programs
Series A Out-Performance Program
In May 2001, the Board of Directors of UDR approved the Series A Out-Performance Program (the
Series A Program) pursuant to which certain executive officers and other key officers of UDR (the
Participants) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in
a limited liability company (the Series A LLC), the only asset of which is a special class of
partnership units of the Operating Partnership (Series A Out-Performance Partnership Shares or
Series A OPPSs), for an initial investment of $1.27 million (the full market value of the Series
A OPPS, at inception, as determined by an independent investment banking firm). The Series A
Program measured the cumulative total return on UDRs common stock over a 28-month period beginning
February 2001 and ending May 31, 2003.
The Series A Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial
returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDRs common stock, measured by the
cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period,
exceeded the greater of (a) the cumulative total return of the Morgan Stanley REIT Index over the
same period; and (b) is at least the equivalent of a 30% total return, or 12% annualized.
At the conclusion of the measurement period on May 31, 2003, UDRs total return satisfied
these criteria. As a result, the Series A LLC as holder of the Series A OPPSs received
distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the
distributions and allocations that were received on 1,853,204 OP Units, which distributions and
allocations were distributed to the participants on a pro rata basis based on the ownership of the
Series A LLC.
Series C Out-Performance Program
In May 2005, the stockholders of UDR approved a new Out-Performance Program and the first
series of new Out-Performance Partnership Shares under the program are the Series C Out-Performance
Units (the Series C Program) pursuant to which certain executive officers and other key employees
of UDR (the Series C Participants) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by
purchasing interests in UDR Out-Performance III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
Series C LLC), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating
Partnership (Series C Out-Performance Partnership Shares or Series C OPPSs). The purchase price
for the Series C OPPSs was determined by the Compensation Committee of UDRs Board of Directors to
be $750,000, assuming 100% participation, and was based upon the advice of an independent valuation
expert. UDRs performance for the Series C Program was measured over the 36-month period from June
1, 2005 to May 30, 2008.
The Series C Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial
returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDRs common stock, as measured by
the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period
is at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (Minimum Return).
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDRs cumulative total return satisfies these
criteria, the Series C LLC as holder of the Series C OPPSs will receive (for the indirect benefit
of the Series C Participants as holders of interests in the Series C LLC) distributions and
allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and
allocations that would be received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
i. determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDRs common stock over
the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the Excess Return);
ii. multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDRs market capitalization (defined as the
average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common stock, common
stock equivalents and OP Units); and
iii. dividing the number obtained in clause (ii) by the market value of one share of UDRs
common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average price per day of
common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the valuation date.
For the Series C OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to (ii) above is capped at 1% of market
capitalization.
21
If, on the valuation date, the cumulative total return of UDRs common stock does not meet the
Minimum Return, then the Series C Participants will forfeit their entire initial investment.
At the conclusion of the measurement period, May 30, 2008, the total cumulative return on
UDRs common stock did not meet the minimum return threshold. As a result, there were no payouts
under the Series C OPPSs program and the investment made by the holders of the Series C OPPSs was
forfeited.
Series D Out-Performance Program
In February 2006, the Board of Directors of UDR approved the Series D Out-Performance Program
(the Series D Program) pursuant to which certain executive officers of UDR (the Series D
Participants) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in
UDR Out-Performance IV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Series D LLC), the only
asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (Series D
Out-Performance Partnership Shares or Series D OPPSs). The Series D Program was part of the New
Out-Performance Program approved by UDRs stockholders in May 2005. The Series D LLC agreed to sell
830,000 membership units unadjusted for the Special Dividend to certain members of UDRs senior
management at a price of $1.00 per unit. The aggregate purchase price of $830,000 for the Series D
OPPSs, assuming 100% participation, was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert.
The Series D Program measured the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 36-month
period beginning January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2008.
The Series D Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial
returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDRs common stock, as measured by
the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period
was at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (Minimum Return).
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDRs cumulative total return satisfied these
criteria, the Series D LLC as holder of the Series D OPPSs would receive (for the indirect benefit
of the Series D Participants as holders of interests in the Series D LLC) distributions and
allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and
allocations that would have been received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
|
i.
|
|
determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDRs common stock
over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the Excess
Return);
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDRs market capitalization (defined as
the average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common
stock, OP Units, common stock equivalents and OP Units); and
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
dividing the number obtained in (ii) by the market value of one share of UDRs
common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average price per
day of the common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the valuation
date.
|
For the Series D OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to clause (ii) above was capped at 1%
of market capitalization.
At the conclusion of the measurement period, December 31, 2008, the total cumulative return on
UDRs common stock did not meet the minimum return threshold. As a result, there were no payouts
under the Series D OPPSs program and the investment made by the holders of the Series D OPPSs was
forfeited.
Series E Out-Performance Program
In February 2007, the board of directors of UDR approved the Series E Out-Performance
Program (the Series E Program) pursuant to which certain executive officers of UDR (the Series E
Participants) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in
UDR Out-Performance V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Series E LLC), the only
asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (Series E
Out-Performance Partnership Shares or Series E OPPSs). The Series E Program was part of the New
Out-Performance Program approved by UDRs stockholders in May 2005. The Series E LLC agreed to
sell 805,000 membership units to certain members of UDRs senior management at a price of $1.00 per
unit. The aggregate purchase price of $805,000 for the Series E OPPSs, assuming 100%
participation, was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. The Series E Program
measured the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 36-month period beginning January
1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2009.
22
The Series E Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial
returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDRs common stock, as measured by
the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period
was at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (Minimum Return).
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDRs cumulative total return satisfied these
criteria, the Series E LLC as holder of the Series E OPPSs would receive (for the indirect benefit
of the Series E Participants as holders of interests in the Series E LLC) distributions and
allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and
allocations that would have been received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
|
i.
|
|
determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDRs common stock
over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the Excess
Return);
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDRs market capitalization (defined as
the average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common
stock, OP Units, common stock equivalents and OP Units); and
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
dividing the number obtained in (ii) by the market value of one share of UDRs
common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average price per
day of the common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the valuation
date.
|
For the Series E OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to clause (ii) above was capped at 0.5%
of market capitalization.
If, on the valuation date, the cumulative total return of UDRs common stock did not meet the
Minimum Return, then the Series E Participants would forfeit their entire initial investment.
At the conclusion of the measurement period, December 31, 2009, the total cumulative return on
UDRs common stock did not meet the minimum return threshold. As a result, there were no payouts
under the Series E OPPSs program and the investment made by the holders of the Series E OPPSs was
forfeited.
The following table shows OP Units activities and OP units outstanding during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Limited
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Out- Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partnership Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,617,815
|
|
|
|
6,423,921
|
|
|
|
156,391,272
|
|
|
|
102,410
|
|
|
|
1,650,322
|
|
|
|
166,185,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPPS unit forfeiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,553
|
)
|
|
|
(22,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPPS unit Series A conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP redemptions for UDR stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919,788
|
)
|
|
|
1,015,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,617,815
|
|
|
|
7,035,746
|
|
|
|
157,407,216
|
|
|
|
102,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,163,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP redemptions for UDR stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,329,782
|
)
|
|
|
1,329,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,617,815
|
|
|
|
5,705,964
|
|
|
|
158,736,998
|
|
|
|
102,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,163,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of units through Special
Dividend
|
|
|
133,856
|
|
|
|
485,986
|
|
|
|
13,117,906
|
|
|
|
8,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,746,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP redemptions for UDR stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,957,029
|
)
|
|
|
1,957,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,751,671
|
|
|
|
4,234,921
|
|
|
|
173,811,933
|
|
|
|
110,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,909,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
Ground Leases
The Operating Partnership owns four communities which are subject to ground leases expiring
between 2019 and 2103. The leases are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 840,
Leases
(formerly SFAS 13). Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2009 are $4.4 million for each
of the years ending December 31, 2010 to 2014, and a total of $295.1 million for years thereafter.
For purposes of our ground lease contracts, the Operating Partnership uses the minimum lease
payment, if stated in the agreement. For ground lease agreements where there is a reset provision
based on the communities appraised value or consumer price index but does not included a specified
minimum lease payment, the Operating Partnership uses the current rent over the remainder of the
lease term.
UDR incurred $4.6 million, $4.3 million and $1.3 million of ground rent expense for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
UDR, L.P. is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business. The Operating Partnership cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such
legal proceedings and claims at this time. UDR, L.P. believes that such liability, to the extent
not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
11. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 280,
Segment Reporting
(formerly SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information) (Topic 280), requires that segment disclosures present the
measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for
purposes of assessing such segments performance. The Operating Partnership has the same chief
operating decision maker as that of its parent, the General Partner. The chief operating decision
maker consists of several members of UDRs executive management team who use several generally
accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business for our reportable
operating segments.
The Operating Partnership owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the
United States that generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of
apartment homes to a diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures of the Operating
Partnerships apartment communities are rental income and net operating income (NOI), and are
included in the chief operating decision makers assessment of UDRs performance on a consolidated
basis. Rental income represents gross market rent less adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss
and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less direct property operating expenses. The chief
operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key measure of segment profit or loss.
The Operating Partnerships two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other
communities:
|
|
|
Same store communities
represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized
prior to January 1, 2008, and held as of December 31, 2009. A comparison of operating
results from the prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized
occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to
conduct substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition
within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it
achieves 90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months.
|
|
|
|
|
Non-mature/other communities
represent those communities that were acquired or developed
in 2007, 2008 or 2009, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as
real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties, joint venture
properties, properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of mixed
use properties.
|
24
Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community
and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the
aggregation criteria of Topic 280 as each of our apartment communities generally has similar
economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Operating Partnerships
reportable segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is
provided to the chief operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants
contributed 10% or more of the Operating Partnerships total revenues during the three years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, or 2007.
The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as
those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The following table
details rental income and NOI for the Operating Partnerships reportable segments for the three
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, and reconciles NOI to income from continuing and
discontinued operations per the consolidated statement of operations
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment rental income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
$
|
176,111
|
|
|
$
|
181,314
|
|
|
$
|
172,625
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
22,247
|
|
|
|
21,886
|
|
|
|
20,096
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
37,596
|
|
|
|
38,415
|
|
|
|
38,340
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
14,889
|
|
|
|
15,475
|
|
|
|
14,934
|
|
Non-Mature communities/Other
|
|
|
102,213
|
|
|
|
104,922
|
|
|
|
199,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental income
|
|
$
|
353,056
|
|
|
$
|
362,012
|
|
|
$
|
445,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment NOI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
$
|
124,770
|
|
|
$
|
128,186
|
|
|
$
|
120,661
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
15,662
|
|
|
|
15,380
|
|
|
|
13,922
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
23,698
|
|
|
|
24,433
|
|
|
|
24,744
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
9,677
|
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
9,864
|
|
Non-Mature communities/Other
|
|
|
66,761
|
|
|
|
67,818
|
|
|
|
124,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated NOI
|
|
|
240,568
|
|
|
|
246,040
|
|
|
|
294,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
13,106
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
(9,709
|
)
|
|
|
(9,956
|
)
|
|
|
(12,243
|
)
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(4,868
|
)
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(166,773
|
)
|
|
|
(154,584
|
)
|
|
|
(158,533
|
)
|
Interest
|
|
|
(53,547
|
)
|
|
|
(47,139
|
)
|
|
|
(47,367
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(16,886
|
)
|
|
|
(19,081
|
)
|
|
|
(23,033
|
)
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property to a joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,433
|
|
Net gain on the sale of real estate
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
475,249
|
|
|
|
44,976
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders
|
|
$
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
497,720
|
|
|
$
|
193,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The following table details the assets of the Operating Partnerships reportable segments for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
$
|
1,647,599
|
|
|
$
|
1,628,580
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
210,233
|
|
|
|
205,960
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
314,549
|
|
|
|
310,694
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
132,381
|
|
|
|
131,250
|
|
Non-Mature communities/Other
|
|
|
1,336,126
|
|
|
|
1,292,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
|
3,640,888
|
|
|
|
3,569,239
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(717,892
|
)
|
|
|
(552,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets net book value
|
|
|
2,922,996
|
|
|
|
3,016,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
Notes receivable due from third party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
|
|
22,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
2,961,067
|
|
|
$
|
3,254,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures related to our same communities totaled $25.5 million, $39.7 million, and
$35.8 million for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Capital
expenditures related to our non-mature/other communities totaled $6.4 million, $6.0 million, and
$30.5 million for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
|
i.
|
|
Western Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, Seattle,
Sacramento, Inland Empire, Portland, and San Diego
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Metropolitan DC and Baltimore
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
Southeastern Nashville, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Other Florida
|
|
|
iv.
|
|
Southwestern Dallas and Phoenix
|
26
12. UNAUDITED SUMMARIZED CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
Selected consolidated quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
is summarized in the table below
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income (a)
|
|
$
|
89,860
|
|
|
$
|
89,399
|
|
|
$
|
87,745
|
|
|
$
|
86,052
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
(3,517
|
)
|
|
|
(7,277
|
)
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Income/(loss) attributable to unitholders
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
(3,371
|
)
|
|
|
(7,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) per OP unit- basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income (a)
|
|
$
|
72,236
|
|
|
$
|
84,694
|
|
|
$
|
89,540
|
|
|
$
|
90,204
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
489,356
|
|
|
|
(2,755
|
)
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Income attributable to unitholders
|
|
|
491,463
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per OP unit- basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents rental income from continuing operations
|
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding securities of
the General Partner (the Guarantees). The Guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as
primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder
of the applicable securities and to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the
respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by
acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture
whether for principal of or interest on the securities, (and premium if any) and all other monetary
obligations of UDR under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities and
(b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations
of the General Partner under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities.
27
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE OWNED
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Gross Amount at Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
to Acquisition
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Construction (a)
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
WESTERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harbor at Mesa Verde
|
|
$
|
46,627,165
|
|
|
$
|
20,476,466
|
|
|
$
|
28,537,805
|
|
|
$
|
49,014,271
|
|
|
$
|
10,618,870
|
|
|
$
|
20,670,994
|
|
|
$
|
38,962,147
|
|
|
$
|
59,633,141
|
|
|
$
|
15,484,576
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Jun-03
|
Pine Brook Village
|
|
|
18,270,000
|
|
|
|
2,581,763
|
|
|
|
25,504,086
|
|
|
|
28,085,849
|
|
|
|
4,384,221
|
|
|
|
3,824,329
|
|
|
|
28,645,741
|
|
|
|
32,470,070
|
|
|
|
10,737,269
|
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
Jun-03
|
Pacific Shores
|
|
|
19,145,000
|
|
|
|
7,345,226
|
|
|
|
22,623,676
|
|
|
|
29,968,902
|
|
|
|
7,068,306
|
|
|
|
7,449,054
|
|
|
|
29,588,154
|
|
|
|
37,037,208
|
|
|
|
11,340,412
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Jun-03
|
Huntington Vista
|
|
|
30,965,678
|
|
|
|
8,055,452
|
|
|
|
22,485,746
|
|
|
|
30,541,198
|
|
|
|
5,551,185
|
|
|
|
8,159,932
|
|
|
|
27,932,451
|
|
|
|
36,092,383
|
|
|
|
10,809,161
|
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
Jun-03
|
Missions at Back Bay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,270
|
|
|
|
14,128,763
|
|
|
|
14,358,033
|
|
|
|
1,506,839
|
|
|
|
10,722,883
|
|
|
|
5,141,989
|
|
|
|
15,864,872
|
|
|
|
2,069,251
|
|
|
|
1969
|
|
|
Dec-03
|
Huntington Villas
|
|
|
55,202,275
|
|
|
|
61,535,270
|
|
|
|
18,017,201
|
|
|
|
79,552,471
|
|
|
|
3,901,751
|
|
|
|
61,811,460
|
|
|
|
21,642,762
|
|
|
|
83,454,222
|
|
|
|
7,621,200
|
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Sep-04
|
Vista Del Rey
|
|
|
13,287,960
|
|
|
|
10,670,493
|
|
|
|
7,079,834
|
|
|
|
17,750,327
|
|
|
|
1,350,982
|
|
|
|
10,720,737
|
|
|
|
8,380,572
|
|
|
|
19,101,309
|
|
|
|
2,906,278
|
|
|
|
1969
|
|
|
Sep-04
|
Coronado at Newport North
|
|
|
51,022,183
|
|
|
|
62,515,901
|
|
|
|
46,082,056
|
|
|
|
108,597,957
|
|
|
|
13,483,171
|
|
|
|
62,881,081
|
|
|
|
59,200,047
|
|
|
|
122,081,128
|
|
|
|
19,779,984
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
Villa Venetia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,825,106
|
|
|
|
24,179,600
|
|
|
|
95,004,706
|
|
|
|
4,578,761
|
|
|
|
70,879,030
|
|
|
|
28,704,437
|
|
|
|
99,583,467
|
|
|
|
9,557,500
|
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
The Arboretum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,562,468
|
|
|
|
14,283,292
|
|
|
|
43,845,760
|
|
|
|
4,651,571
|
|
|
|
29,644,322
|
|
|
|
18,853,009
|
|
|
|
48,497,331
|
|
|
|
6,437,211
|
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
Coronado South
|
|
|
92,753,546
|
|
|
|
58,784,785
|
|
|
|
50,066,757
|
|
|
|
108,851,542
|
|
|
|
10,707,321
|
|
|
|
58,998,987
|
|
|
|
60,559,876
|
|
|
|
119,558,863
|
|
|
|
18,980,841
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Mar-05
|
Pine Brook Village II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,921,787
|
|
|
|
60,961,271
|
|
|
|
86,883,058
|
|
|
|
1,040,022
|
|
|
|
25,922,661
|
|
|
|
62,000,419
|
|
|
|
87,923,080
|
|
|
|
5,822,994
|
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
May-08
|
ORANGE COUNTY, CA
|
|
|
327,273,807
|
|
|
|
358,503,987
|
|
|
|
333,950,086
|
|
|
|
692,454,073
|
|
|
|
68,842,999
|
|
|
|
371,685,468
|
|
|
|
389,611,605
|
|
|
|
761,297,073
|
|
|
|
121,546,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 Post Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,860,627
|
|
|
|
44,577,506
|
|
|
|
54,438,133
|
|
|
|
6,204,104
|
|
|
|
10,108,051
|
|
|
|
50,534,186
|
|
|
|
60,642,237
|
|
|
|
15,722,757
|
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Birch Creek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,365,315
|
|
|
|
16,695,509
|
|
|
|
21,060,824
|
|
|
|
4,830,938
|
|
|
|
4,974,519
|
|
|
|
20,917,243
|
|
|
|
25,891,762
|
|
|
|
8,992,023
|
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Highlands Of Marin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,995,838
|
|
|
|
24,868,350
|
|
|
|
30,864,188
|
|
|
|
20,819,591
|
|
|
|
6,565,347
|
|
|
|
45,118,432
|
|
|
|
51,683,779
|
|
|
|
10,873,389
|
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Marina Playa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,224,383
|
|
|
|
23,916,283
|
|
|
|
30,140,666
|
|
|
|
6,714,093
|
|
|
|
6,704,196
|
|
|
|
30,150,563
|
|
|
|
36,854,759
|
|
|
|
12,466,018
|
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Crossroads Apartments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,811,488
|
|
|
|
10,169,520
|
|
|
|
14,981,008
|
|
|
|
3,262,201
|
|
|
|
4,981,126
|
|
|
|
13,262,083
|
|
|
|
18,243,209
|
|
|
|
4,681,688
|
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Jul-04
|
River Terrace
|
|
|
33,130,377
|
|
|
|
22,161,247
|
|
|
|
40,137,141
|
|
|
|
62,298,388
|
|
|
|
1,322,899
|
|
|
|
22,207,243
|
|
|
|
41,414,044
|
|
|
|
63,621,287
|
|
|
|
10,860,801
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Aug-05
|
Bay Terrace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,544,559
|
|
|
|
14,457,992
|
|
|
|
23,002,551
|
|
|
|
1,210,528
|
|
|
|
8,549,384
|
|
|
|
15,663,695
|
|
|
|
24,213,079
|
|
|
|
3,889,870
|
|
|
|
1962
|
|
|
Oct-05
|
Lake Pines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,031,365
|
|
|
|
30,536,982
|
|
|
|
44,568,347
|
|
|
|
4,494,356
|
|
|
|
14,032,728
|
|
|
|
35,029,975
|
|
|
|
49,062,703
|
|
|
|
8,167,660
|
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Nov-05
|
Highlands of Marin Phase II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,352,554
|
|
|
|
18,558,883
|
|
|
|
23,911,437
|
|
|
|
3,472,383
|
|
|
|
5,516,687
|
|
|
|
21,867,133
|
|
|
|
27,383,820
|
|
|
|
2,631,881
|
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
Oct-07
|
Edgewater
|
|
|
41,037,000
|
|
|
|
30,657,223
|
|
|
|
83,872,319
|
|
|
|
114,529,542
|
|
|
|
1,121,379
|
|
|
|
30,658,037
|
|
|
|
84,992,884
|
|
|
|
115,650,921
|
|
|
|
8,889,460
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Mar-08
|
Almaden Lake Village
|
|
|
27,000,000
|
|
|
|
593,923
|
|
|
|
42,514,864
|
|
|
|
43,108,787
|
|
|
|
1,374,282
|
|
|
|
606,613
|
|
|
|
43,876,456
|
|
|
|
44,483,069
|
|
|
|
3,826,089
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
Jul-08
|
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
|
|
|
101,167,377
|
|
|
|
112,598,522
|
|
|
|
350,305,348
|
|
|
|
462,903,870
|
|
|
|
54,826,755
|
|
|
|
114,903,932
|
|
|
|
402,826,693
|
|
|
|
517,730,625
|
|
|
|
91,001,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Crest
|
|
|
56,695,508
|
|
|
|
21,953,480
|
|
|
|
67,808,654
|
|
|
|
89,762,134
|
|
|
|
6,159,041
|
|
|
|
22,072,766
|
|
|
|
73,848,409
|
|
|
|
95,921,175
|
|
|
|
23,589,881
|
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Sep-04
|
Rosebeach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,414,478
|
|
|
|
17,449,593
|
|
|
|
25,864,071
|
|
|
|
1,397,453
|
|
|
|
8,461,848
|
|
|
|
18,799,676
|
|
|
|
27,261,524
|
|
|
|
6,073,469
|
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
Sep-04
|
The Villas @ San Dimas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,180,619
|
|
|
|
16,735,364
|
|
|
|
24,915,983
|
|
|
|
2,182,227
|
|
|
|
8,238,635
|
|
|
|
18,859,575
|
|
|
|
27,098,210
|
|
|
|
6,096,833
|
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
The Villas at Bonita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,498,439
|
|
|
|
11,699,117
|
|
|
|
16,197,556
|
|
|
|
733,750
|
|
|
|
4,535,953
|
|
|
|
12,395,353
|
|
|
|
16,931,306
|
|
|
|
3,910,957
|
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
Ocean Villa
|
|
|
9,118,462
|
|
|
|
5,134,982
|
|
|
|
12,788,885
|
|
|
|
17,923,867
|
|
|
|
965,877
|
|
|
|
5,204,838
|
|
|
|
13,684,906
|
|
|
|
18,889,744
|
|
|
|
4,186,143
|
|
|
|
1965
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
Tierra Del Rey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,585,534
|
|
|
|
36,678,725
|
|
|
|
76,264,259
|
|
|
|
1,297,920
|
|
|
|
39,588,890
|
|
|
|
37,973,289
|
|
|
|
77,562,179
|
|
|
|
4,613,762
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
Dec-07
|
LOS ANGELES, CA
|
|
|
65,813,970
|
|
|
|
87,767,532
|
|
|
|
163,160,338
|
|
|
|
250,927,870
|
|
|
|
12,736,269
|
|
|
|
88,102,930
|
|
|
|
175,561,209
|
|
|
|
263,664,139
|
|
|
|
48,471,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crowne Pointe
|
|
|
11,002,109
|
|
|
|
2,486,252
|
|
|
|
6,437,256
|
|
|
|
8,923,508
|
|
|
|
3,777,319
|
|
|
|
2,666,047
|
|
|
|
10,034,780
|
|
|
|
12,700,827
|
|
|
|
4,480,845
|
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Hilltop
|
|
|
8,545,060
|
|
|
|
2,173,969
|
|
|
|
7,407,628
|
|
|
|
9,581,597
|
|
|
|
2,733,418
|
|
|
|
2,526,400
|
|
|
|
9,788,615
|
|
|
|
12,315,015
|
|
|
|
4,080,310
|
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
The Kennedy
|
|
|
18,839,339
|
|
|
|
6,178,440
|
|
|
|
22,306,568
|
|
|
|
28,485,008
|
|
|
|
784,042
|
|
|
|
6,195,752
|
|
|
|
23,073,298
|
|
|
|
29,269,050
|
|
|
|
5,604,659
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Nov-05
|
Hearthstone at Merrill Creek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,848,144
|
|
|
|
30,922,147
|
|
|
|
37,770,291
|
|
|
|
1,183,116
|
|
|
|
6,854,137
|
|
|
|
32,099,270
|
|
|
|
38,953,407
|
|
|
|
3,102,096
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
May-08
|
Island Square
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,284,245
|
|
|
|
89,389,087
|
|
|
|
110,673,332
|
|
|
|
1,847,145
|
|
|
|
21,290,237
|
|
|
|
91,230,240
|
|
|
|
112,520,477
|
|
|
|
7,712,456
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Jul-08
|
SEATTLE, WA
|
|
|
38,386,509
|
|
|
|
38,971,050
|
|
|
|
156,462,686
|
|
|
|
195,433,736
|
|
|
|
10,325,040
|
|
|
|
39,532,574
|
|
|
|
166,226,203
|
|
|
|
205,758,776
|
|
|
|
24,980,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presidio at Rancho Del Oro
|
|
|
13,325,000
|
|
|
|
9,163,939
|
|
|
|
22,694,492
|
|
|
|
31,858,431
|
|
|
|
4,278,261
|
|
|
|
9,515,265
|
|
|
|
26,621,427
|
|
|
|
36,136,692
|
|
|
|
9,443,315
|
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Jun-04
|
Villas at Carlsbad
|
|
|
8,671,273
|
|
|
|
6,516,636
|
|
|
|
10,717,601
|
|
|
|
17,234,237
|
|
|
|
1,165,928
|
|
|
|
6,596,917
|
|
|
|
11,803,248
|
|
|
|
18,400,165
|
|
|
|
3,630,228
|
|
|
|
1966
|
|
|
Oct-04
|
Summit at Mission Bay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,598,529
|
|
|
|
17,181,401
|
|
|
|
39,779,930
|
|
|
|
4,323,759
|
|
|
|
22,620,629
|
|
|
|
21,483,060
|
|
|
|
44,103,689
|
|
|
|
6,598,142
|
|
|
|
1953
|
|
|
Nov-04
|
SAN DIEGO, CA
|
|
|
21,996,273
|
|
|
|
38,279,104
|
|
|
|
50,593,494
|
|
|
|
88,872,598
|
|
|
|
9,767,948
|
|
|
|
38,732,811
|
|
|
|
59,907,735
|
|
|
|
98,640,546
|
|
|
|
19,671,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boronda Manor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,946,423
|
|
|
|
8,981,742
|
|
|
|
10,928,165
|
|
|
|
7,815,427
|
|
|
|
3,079,131
|
|
|
|
15,664,461
|
|
|
|
18,743,592
|
|
|
|
5,431,440
|
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Garden Court
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888,038
|
|
|
|
4,187,950
|
|
|
|
5,075,988
|
|
|
|
3,997,400
|
|
|
|
1,424,192
|
|
|
|
7,649,196
|
|
|
|
9,073,388
|
|
|
|
2,723,125
|
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Cambridge Court
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,038,877
|
|
|
|
12,883,312
|
|
|
|
15,922,189
|
|
|
|
12,364,763
|
|
|
|
5,119,301
|
|
|
|
23,167,651
|
|
|
|
28,286,952
|
|
|
|
8,390,404
|
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Laurel Tree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303,902
|
|
|
|
5,115,356
|
|
|
|
6,419,258
|
|
|
|
5,155,032
|
|
|
|
2,056,277
|
|
|
|
9,518,013
|
|
|
|
11,574,290
|
|
|
|
3,306,423
|
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
The Pointe At Harden Ranch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,388,446
|
|
|
|
23,853,534
|
|
|
|
30,241,980
|
|
|
|
22,641,042
|
|
|
|
9,695,985
|
|
|
|
43,187,037
|
|
|
|
52,883,022
|
|
|
|
14,625,757
|
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
The Pointe At Northridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,043,736
|
|
|
|
8,028,443
|
|
|
|
10,072,179
|
|
|
|
8,776,279
|
|
|
|
3,190,463
|
|
|
|
15,657,995
|
|
|
|
18,848,458
|
|
|
|
5,479,156
|
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
The Pointe At Westlake
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329,064
|
|
|
|
5,334,004
|
|
|
|
6,663,068
|
|
|
|
4,854,800
|
|
|
|
2,105,691
|
|
|
|
9,412,177
|
|
|
|
11,517,868
|
|
|
|
3,233,985
|
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
MONTEREY PENINSULA, CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,938,486
|
|
|
|
68,384,341
|
|
|
|
85,322,827
|
|
|
|
65,604,744
|
|
|
|
26,671,041
|
|
|
|
124,256,530
|
|
|
|
150,927,571
|
|
|
|
43,190,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verano at Rancho Cucamonga Town Square
|
|
|
53,773,090
|
|
|
|
13,557,235
|
|
|
|
3,645,406
|
|
|
|
17,202,641
|
|
|
|
51,738,113
|
|
|
|
22,856,282
|
|
|
|
46,084,472
|
|
|
|
68,940,754
|
|
|
|
14,612,379
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Oct-02
|
Waterstone at Murrieta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,597,865
|
|
|
|
34,702,760
|
|
|
|
45,300,625
|
|
|
|
4,467,706
|
|
|
|
10,766,548
|
|
|
|
39,001,783
|
|
|
|
49,768,331
|
|
|
|
13,175,753
|
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
Nov-04
|
INLAND EMPIRE, CA
|
|
|
53,773,090
|
|
|
|
24,155,100
|
|
|
|
38,348,166
|
|
|
|
62,503,266
|
|
|
|
56,205,819
|
|
|
|
33,622,830
|
|
|
|
85,086,255
|
|
|
|
118,709,085
|
|
|
|
27,788,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foothills Tennis Village
|
|
|
17,408,221
|
|
|
|
3,617,507
|
|
|
|
14,542,028
|
|
|
|
18,159,535
|
|
|
|
5,016,140
|
|
|
|
3,918,693
|
|
|
|
19,256,982
|
|
|
|
23,175,675
|
|
|
|
8,898,165
|
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Woodlake Village
|
|
|
31,154,663
|
|
|
|
6,772,438
|
|
|
|
26,966,750
|
|
|
|
33,739,188
|
|
|
|
10,469,336
|
|
|
|
7,626,752
|
|
|
|
36,581,772
|
|
|
|
44,208,524
|
|
|
|
16,996,018
|
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
SACRAMENTO, CA
|
|
|
48,562,884
|
|
|
|
10,389,945
|
|
|
|
41,508,778
|
|
|
|
51,898,723
|
|
|
|
15,485,477
|
|
|
|
11,545,446
|
|
|
|
55,838,754
|
|
|
|
67,384,200
|
|
|
|
25,894,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tualatin Heights
|
|
|
11,312,843
|
|
|
|
3,272,585
|
|
|
|
9,134,089
|
|
|
|
12,406,674
|
|
|
|
5,037,441
|
|
|
|
3,612,751
|
|
|
|
13,831,364
|
|
|
|
17,444,115
|
|
|
|
5,949,885
|
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Andover Park
|
|
|
17,225,000
|
|
|
|
2,916,576
|
|
|
|
16,994,580
|
|
|
|
19,911,156
|
|
|
|
6,036,815
|
|
|
|
3,097,964
|
|
|
|
22,850,007
|
|
|
|
25,947,971
|
|
|
|
7,890,920
|
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Sep-04
|
Hunt Club
|
|
|
18,395,000
|
|
|
|
6,014,006
|
|
|
|
14,870,326
|
|
|
|
20,884,332
|
|
|
|
4,434,125
|
|
|
|
6,200,539
|
|
|
|
19,117,918
|
|
|
|
25,318,457
|
|
|
|
6,640,143
|
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
Sep-04
|
PORTLAND, OR
|
|
|
46,932,843
|
|
|
|
12,203,167
|
|
|
|
40,998,995
|
|
|
|
53,202,162
|
|
|
|
15,508,382
|
|
|
|
12,911,254
|
|
|
|
55,799,290
|
|
|
|
68,710,544
|
|
|
|
20,480,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL WESTERN REGION
|
|
|
703,906,754
|
|
|
|
699,806,892
|
|
|
|
1,243,712,232
|
|
|
|
1,943,519,124
|
|
|
|
309,303,433
|
|
|
|
737,708,284
|
|
|
|
1,515,114,273
|
|
|
|
2,252,822,557
|
|
|
|
423,024,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
UNITED DOMION REALTY, L.P.
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE OWNED (Continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Gross Amount at Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
to Acquisition
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Construction (a)
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Whitmore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,417,889
|
|
|
|
13,411,278
|
|
|
|
19,829,167
|
|
|
|
19,365,296
|
|
|
|
7,420,651
|
|
|
|
31,773,812
|
|
|
|
39,194,463
|
|
|
|
11,523,493
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Apr-02
|
Ridgewood
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,612,147
|
|
|
|
20,085,474
|
|
|
|
25,697,621
|
|
|
|
6,656,435
|
|
|
|
5,789,750
|
|
|
|
26,564,306
|
|
|
|
32,354,056
|
|
|
|
12,497,527
|
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
Aug-02
|
The Calvert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,807
|
|
|
|
11,188,623
|
|
|
|
11,451,430
|
|
|
|
14,173,170
|
|
|
|
8,264,652
|
|
|
|
17,359,948
|
|
|
|
25,624,600
|
|
|
|
6,920,949
|
|
|
|
1962
|
|
|
Nov-03
|
Wellington Place at Olde Town
|
|
|
28,680,802
|
|
|
|
13,753,346
|
|
|
|
36,059,193
|
|
|
|
49,812,539
|
|
|
|
15,850,078
|
|
|
|
14,474,320
|
|
|
|
51,188,297
|
|
|
|
65,662,617
|
|
|
|
14,325,997
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sep-05
|
Andover House
|
|
|
36,127,024
|
|
|
|
14,357,021
|
|
|
|
51,577,112
|
|
|
|
65,934,133
|
|
|
|
2,125,845
|
|
|
|
14,359,813
|
|
|
|
53,700,165
|
|
|
|
68,059,978
|
|
|
|
8,548,042
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Mar-07
|
Sullivan Place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136,778
|
|
|
|
103,676,103
|
|
|
|
104,812,881
|
|
|
|
2,155,733
|
|
|
|
1,173,249
|
|
|
|
105,795,365
|
|
|
|
106,968,614
|
|
|
|
12,678,340
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dec-07
|
Delancey at Shirlington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,605,992
|
|
|
|
66,765,252
|
|
|
|
88,371,244
|
|
|
|
658,983
|
|
|
|
21,611,692
|
|
|
|
67,418,535
|
|
|
|
89,030,227
|
|
|
|
6,807,335
|
|
|
|
2006/07
|
|
|
Mar-08
|
Circle Towers
|
|
|
69,214,719
|
|
|
|
33,010,740
|
|
|
|
107,051,197
|
|
|
|
140,061,937
|
|
|
|
3,401,703
|
|
|
|
32,815,406
|
|
|
|
110,648,234
|
|
|
|
143,463,640
|
|
|
|
10,867,671
|
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Mar-08
|
METROPOLITAN, DC
|
|
|
134,022,545
|
|
|
|
96,156,719
|
|
|
|
409,814,232
|
|
|
|
505,970,952
|
|
|
|
64,387,244
|
|
|
|
105,909,533
|
|
|
|
464,448,662
|
|
|
|
570,358,196
|
|
|
|
84,169,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeside Mill
|
|
|
15,241,992
|
|
|
|
2,665,869
|
|
|
|
10,109,175
|
|
|
|
12,775,044
|
|
|
|
3,175,979
|
|
|
|
2,821,986
|
|
|
|
13,129,037
|
|
|
|
15,951,023
|
|
|
|
7,941,043
|
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Dec-99
|
Tamar Meadow
|
|
|
16,075,701
|
|
|
|
4,144,926
|
|
|
|
17,149,514
|
|
|
|
21,294,440
|
|
|
|
3,914,310
|
|
|
|
4,457,718
|
|
|
|
20,751,032
|
|
|
|
25,208,750
|
|
|
|
9,343,582
|
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
Nov-02
|
Calverts Walk
|
|
|
19,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,408,192
|
|
|
|
24,692,115
|
|
|
|
29,100,307
|
|
|
|
4,790,617
|
|
|
|
4,546,169
|
|
|
|
29,344,755
|
|
|
|
33,890,924
|
|
|
|
10,580,495
|
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
Mar-04
|
Liriope Apartments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,620,382
|
|
|
|
6,790,681
|
|
|
|
8,411,063
|
|
|
|
732,897
|
|
|
|
1,628,063
|
|
|
|
7,515,897
|
|
|
|
9,143,960
|
|
|
|
2,711,366
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Mar-04
|
20 Lambourne
|
|
|
32,000,000
|
|
|
|
11,749,575
|
|
|
|
45,589,714
|
|
|
|
57,339,289
|
|
|
|
2,525,271
|
|
|
|
11,777,026
|
|
|
|
48,087,534
|
|
|
|
59,864,560
|
|
|
|
5,286,929
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Mar-08
|
BALTIMORE, MD
|
|
|
82,817,692
|
|
|
|
24,588,944
|
|
|
|
104,331,199
|
|
|
|
128,920,143
|
|
|
|
15,139,074
|
|
|
|
25,230,962
|
|
|
|
118,828,255
|
|
|
|
144,059,216
|
|
|
|
35,863,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MID-ATLANTIC REGION
|
|
|
216,840,238
|
|
|
|
120,745,663
|
|
|
|
514,145,431
|
|
|
|
634,891,094
|
|
|
|
79,526,318
|
|
|
|
131,140,495
|
|
|
|
583,276,917
|
|
|
|
714,417,412
|
|
|
|
120,032,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar Mill Creek
|
|
|
10,185,064
|
|
|
|
2,241,880
|
|
|
|
7,552,520
|
|
|
|
9,794,400
|
|
|
|
5,344,307
|
|
|
|
2,647,456
|
|
|
|
12,491,251
|
|
|
|
15,138,707
|
|
|
|
5,751,666
|
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
Dec-98
|
Inlet Bay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,701,679
|
|
|
|
23,149,670
|
|
|
|
30,851,349
|
|
|
|
10,177,448
|
|
|
|
8,409,425
|
|
|
|
32,619,372
|
|
|
|
41,028,797
|
|
|
|
14,725,170
|
|
|
|
1988/89
|
|
|
Jun-03
|
MacAlpine Place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,869,386
|
|
|
|
36,857,512
|
|
|
|
47,726,898
|
|
|
|
3,543,389
|
|
|
|
10,947,551
|
|
|
|
40,322,736
|
|
|
|
51,270,287
|
|
|
|
13,027,338
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Dec-04
|
TAMPA, FL
|
|
|
10,185,064
|
|
|
|
20,812,945
|
|
|
|
67,559,702
|
|
|
|
88,372,647
|
|
|
|
19,065,143
|
|
|
|
22,004,432
|
|
|
|
85,433,359
|
|
|
|
107,437,790
|
|
|
|
33,504,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Hill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147,660
|
|
|
|
5,867,567
|
|
|
|
7,015,227
|
|
|
|
7,414,277
|
|
|
|
1,668,638
|
|
|
|
12,760,866
|
|
|
|
14,429,504
|
|
|
|
7,878,230
|
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
Nov-95
|
Hickory Run
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,468,727
|
|
|
|
11,583,786
|
|
|
|
13,052,513
|
|
|
|
7,312,612
|
|
|
|
1,959,094
|
|
|
|
18,406,031
|
|
|
|
20,365,125
|
|
|
|
9,029,778
|
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Dec-95
|
Carrington Hills
|
|
|
20,204,103
|
|
|
|
2,117,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117,244
|
|
|
|
31,294,081
|
|
|
|
4,133,316
|
|
|
|
29,278,009
|
|
|
|
33,411,325
|
|
|
|
13,245,118
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
Dec-95
|
Brookridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,508
|
|
|
|
5,461,251
|
|
|
|
6,168,759
|
|
|
|
3,424,991
|
|
|
|
989,147
|
|
|
|
8,604,603
|
|
|
|
9,593,750
|
|
|
|
4,703,651
|
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Mar-96
|
Breckenridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766,428
|
|
|
|
7,713,862
|
|
|
|
8,480,290
|
|
|
|
3,207,484
|
|
|
|
1,125,805
|
|
|
|
10,561,969
|
|
|
|
11,687,774
|
|
|
|
5,204,746
|
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Mar-97
|
Polo Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,582,666
|
|
|
|
16,293,022
|
|
|
|
20,875,688
|
|
|
|
14,659,449
|
|
|
|
5,485,024
|
|
|
|
30,050,113
|
|
|
|
35,535,137
|
|
|
|
8,253,655
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
May-06
|
NASHVILLE, TN
|
|
|
20,204,103
|
|
|
|
10,790,233
|
|
|
|
46,919,488
|
|
|
|
57,709,721
|
|
|
|
67,312,895
|
|
|
|
15,361,024
|
|
|
|
109,661,591
|
|
|
|
125,022,616
|
|
|
|
48,315,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St Johns Plantation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288,214
|
|
|
|
33,101,763
|
|
|
|
37,389,977
|
|
|
|
4,578,015
|
|
|
|
4,414,682
|
|
|
|
37,553,310
|
|
|
|
41,967,992
|
|
|
|
11,355,762
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Jun-05
|
JACKSONVILLE, FL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288,214
|
|
|
|
33,101,763
|
|
|
|
37,389,977
|
|
|
|
4,578,014
|
|
|
|
4,414,682
|
|
|
|
37,553,310
|
|
|
|
41,967,992
|
|
|
|
11,355,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Reserve and The Park at Riverbridge
|
|
|
40,133,018
|
|
|
|
15,968,090
|
|
|
|
56,400,716
|
|
|
|
72,368,806
|
|
|
|
3,287,053
|
|
|
|
16,123,077
|
|
|
|
59,532,782
|
|
|
|
75,655,859
|
|
|
|
18,734,255
|
|
|
|
1999/2001
|
|
|
Dec-04
|
OTHER FLORIDA
|
|
|
40,133,018
|
|
|
|
15,968,090
|
|
|
|
56,400,716
|
|
|
|
72,368,806
|
|
|
|
3,287,053
|
|
|
|
16,123,077
|
|
|
|
59,532,782
|
|
|
|
75,655,859
|
|
|
|
18,734,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SOUTHEASTERN REGION
|
|
|
70,522,186
|
|
|
|
51,859,482
|
|
|
|
203,981,669
|
|
|
|
255,841,151
|
|
|
|
94,243,106
|
|
|
|
57,903,215
|
|
|
|
292,181,042
|
|
|
|
350,084,257
|
|
|
|
111,909,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIRTY377
|
|
|
31,175,000
|
|
|
|
24,035,881
|
|
|
|
32,950,822
|
|
|
|
56,986,703
|
|
|
|
4,887,121
|
|
|
|
24,139,018
|
|
|
|
37,734,806
|
|
|
|
61,873,824
|
|
|
|
8,199,741
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Aug-06
|
Legacy Village
|
|
|
64,090,000
|
|
|
|
16,881,795
|
|
|
|
100,101,840
|
|
|
|
116,983,635
|
|
|
|
2,413,489
|
|
|
|
16,889,308
|
|
|
|
102,507,816
|
|
|
|
119,397,124
|
|
|
|
11,014,059
|
|
|
|
2005/06/07
|
|
|
Mar-08
|
DALLAS, TX
|
|
|
95,265,000
|
|
|
|
40,917,676
|
|
|
|
133,052,662
|
|
|
|
173,970,338
|
|
|
|
7,300,610
|
|
|
|
41,028,327
|
|
|
|
140,242,621
|
|
|
|
181,270,948
|
|
|
|
19,213,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sierra Foothills
|
|
|
20,770,824
|
|
|
|
2,728,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,728,172
|
|
|
|
20,432,147
|
|
|
|
4,985,042
|
|
|
|
18,175,277
|
|
|
|
23,160,319
|
|
|
|
11,661,524
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Feb-98
|
Finisterra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,273,798
|
|
|
|
26,392,207
|
|
|
|
27,666,005
|
|
|
|
3,202,796
|
|
|
|
1,571,058
|
|
|
|
29,297,743
|
|
|
|
30,868,801
|
|
|
|
11,684,634
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Mar-98
|
Sierra Canyon
|
|
|
14,893,446
|
|
|
|
1,809,864
|
|
|
|
12,963,581
|
|
|
|
14,773,445
|
|
|
|
1,704,350
|
|
|
|
2,009,699
|
|
|
|
14,468,096
|
|
|
|
16,477,795
|
|
|
|
7,361,765
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Dec-01
|
PHOENIX, AZ
|
|
|
35,664,270
|
|
|
|
5,811,834
|
|
|
|
39,355,788
|
|
|
|
45,167,621
|
|
|
|
25,339,294
|
|
|
|
8,565,799
|
|
|
|
61,941,116
|
|
|
|
70,506,915
|
|
|
|
30,707,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barton Creek Landing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150,998
|
|
|
|
14,269,086
|
|
|
|
17,420,084
|
|
|
|
9,867,134
|
|
|
|
3,201,989
|
|
|
|
24,085,229
|
|
|
|
27,287,218
|
|
|
|
8,402,460
|
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Mar-02
|
AUSTIN, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150,998
|
|
|
|
14,269,086
|
|
|
|
17,420,084
|
|
|
|
9,867,134
|
|
|
|
3,201,989
|
|
|
|
24,085,229
|
|
|
|
27,287,218
|
|
|
|
8,402,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inn @ Los Patios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,005,300
|
|
|
|
11,544,700
|
|
|
|
14,550,000
|
|
|
|
(1,453,572
|
)
|
|
|
3,023,264
|
|
|
|
10,073,164
|
|
|
|
13,096,428
|
|
|
|
3,574,516
|
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
Aug-98
|
OTHER TEXAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,005,300
|
|
|
|
11,544,700
|
|
|
|
14,550,000
|
|
|
|
(1,453,572
|
)
|
|
|
3,023,264
|
|
|
|
10,073,164
|
|
|
|
13,096,428
|
|
|
|
3,574,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SOUTHWESTERN REGION
|
|
|
130,929,270
|
|
|
|
52,885,808
|
|
|
|
198,222,236
|
|
|
|
251,108,043
|
|
|
|
41,053,465
|
|
|
|
55,819,379
|
|
|
|
236,342,129
|
|
|
|
292,161,509
|
|
|
|
61,898,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL APARTMENTS
|
|
|
1,122,198,447
|
|
|
|
925,297,845
|
|
|
|
2,160,061,568
|
|
|
|
3,085,359,413
|
|
|
|
524,126,322
|
|
|
|
982,571,373
|
|
|
|
2,626,914,362
|
|
|
|
3,609,485,735
|
|
|
|
716,865,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presidio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523,922
|
|
|
|
923,218
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
1,147,140
|
|
|
|
2,447,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR Pacific Los Alisos, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,297,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,297,661
|
|
|
|
2,111,335
|
|
|
|
16,384,597
|
|
|
|
3,024,399
|
|
|
|
19,408,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,821,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,821,583
|
|
|
|
3,034,553
|
|
|
|
17,684,597
|
|
|
|
4,171,539
|
|
|
|
21,856,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMERCIAL HELD FOR INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Calvert commercial side
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,128
|
|
|
|
1,597,359
|
|
|
|
1,631,487
|
|
|
|
1,175,098
|
|
|
|
1,171,995
|
|
|
|
1,634,590
|
|
|
|
2,806,585
|
|
|
|
569,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circle Towers Office Bldg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406,626
|
|
|
|
4,498,210
|
|
|
|
5,904,836
|
|
|
|
877,163
|
|
|
|
1,380,054
|
|
|
|
5,401,945
|
|
|
|
6,739,289
|
|
|
|
457,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,440,754
|
|
|
|
6,095,569
|
|
|
|
7,536,322
|
|
|
|
2,009,552
|
|
|
|
2,554,162
|
|
|
|
6,991,712
|
|
|
|
9,545,874
|
|
|
|
1,025,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL REAL ESTATE OWNED
|
|
$
|
1,122,198,447
|
|
|
$
|
945,560,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,166,157,136
|
|
|
$
|
3,111,717,318
|
|
|
$
|
529,170,426
|
|
|
$
|
1,002,810,132
|
|
|
$
|
2,638,077,612
|
|
|
$
|
3,640,887,744
|
|
|
$
|
717,891,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Date of construction or date of last major renovation.
|
The depreciable life for all buildings is 35 years.
29
3-YEAR ROLLFORWARD OF REAL ESTATE OWNED AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
The following is a reconciliation of the carrying amount of total real estate owned at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
3,569,239,133
|
|
|
$
|
3,639,378,797
|
|
|
$
|
3,621,449,009
|
|
Real estate acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801,852,426
|
|
|
|
271,589,766
|
|
Capital expenditures and development
|
|
|
71,648,612
|
|
|
|
84,313,277
|
|
|
|
92,236,917
|
|
Real estate transferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,416,055
|
)
|
Real estate sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956,305,367
|
)
|
|
|
(327,480,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
3,640,887,745
|
|
|
$
|
3,569,239,133
|
|
|
$
|
3,639,378,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of total accumulated depreciation for real estate owned
at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
552,369,019
|
|
|
$
|
754,995,588
|
|
|
$
|
689,243,781
|
|
Depreciation expense for the year
|
|
|
165,756,124
|
|
|
|
148,997,413
|
|
|
|
158,523,619
|
|
Accumulated depreciation on assets
transferred to UDR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(790,809
|
)
|
Accumulated depreciation on asset retirements
|
|
|
(233,641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation on real estate sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351,623,983
|
)
|
|
|
(91,981,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
717,891,502
|
|
|
$
|
552,369,018
|
|
|
$
|
754,995,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(audited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment
|
|
$
|
3,675,055
|
|
|
$
|
3,640,888
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(800,852
|
)
|
|
|
(717,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
2,874,203
|
|
|
|
2,922,996
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
8,083
|
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18,649
|
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,908,591
|
|
|
$
|
2,961,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
$
|
1,132,244
|
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
Note payable due to General Partner
|
|
|
71,547
|
|
|
|
71,547
|
|
Real estate taxes payable
|
|
|
5,491
|
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
Security deposits and prepaid rent
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
|
|
13,728
|
|
Distributions payable
|
|
|
32,660
|
|
|
|
32,642
|
|
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property
|
|
|
63,838
|
|
|
|
63,838
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
|
|
|
33,229
|
|
|
|
25,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,351,659
|
|
|
|
1,339,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating partnership units: 179,909,408 OP units outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partner: 110,883 OP units outstanding
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Limited partners: 179,798,525 OP units outstanding
|
|
|
2,125,494
|
|
|
|
2,199,450
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(6,052
|
)
|
|
|
(3,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
2,120,853
|
|
|
|
2,197,753
|
|
Receivable due from General Partner
|
|
|
(576,136
|
)
|
|
|
(588,185
|
)
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
12,215
|
|
|
|
12,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
|
|
1,556,932
|
|
|
|
1,621,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and capital
|
|
$
|
2,908,591
|
|
|
$
|
2,961,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
31
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
87,095
|
|
|
$
|
89,399
|
|
|
$
|
173,295
|
|
|
$
|
179,260
|
|
Non-property income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
87,179
|
|
|
|
91,398
|
|
|
|
174,851
|
|
|
|
184,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance
|
|
|
10,561
|
|
|
|
10,357
|
|
|
|
21,602
|
|
|
|
21,729
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
|
|
13,967
|
|
|
|
13,602
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
8,887
|
|
|
|
8,620
|
|
Repair and maintenance
|
|
|
4,403
|
|
|
|
4,347
|
|
|
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
8,298
|
|
Administrative and marketing
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
3,498
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
4,930
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41,693
|
|
|
|
41,437
|
|
|
|
83,123
|
|
|
|
83,290
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on secured debt
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
12,303
|
|
|
|
25,829
|
|
|
|
22,598
|
|
Interest on note payable due to General Partner
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
|
|
10,655
|
|
|
|
7,811
|
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
91,438
|
|
|
|
89,938
|
|
|
|
183,594
|
|
|
|
179,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from operations and continuing operations
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
(8,743
|
)
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss)/income
|
|
|
(4,222
|
)
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
(8,646
|
)
|
|
|
6,688
|
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(4,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
(8,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per OP unit- basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from continuing operations attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
(Loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average OP units outstanding
|
|
|
179,909
|
|
|
|
179,909
|
|
|
|
179,909
|
|
|
|
177,707
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
32
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
$
|
(8,646
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,688
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
83,123
|
|
|
|
83,290
|
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
Write off of bad debt
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in operating assets
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
Decrease in operating liabilities
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
(8,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
77,240
|
|
|
|
69,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures and other major improvements real estate assets,
net of escrow reimbursement
|
|
|
(28,248
|
)
|
|
|
(32,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(28,248
|
)
|
|
|
(32,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments and distributions to UDR, Inc.
|
|
|
(55,926
|
)
|
|
|
(240,327
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt
|
|
|
11,326
|
|
|
|
223,422
|
|
Payments on secured debt
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(15,058
|
)
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(2,087
|
)
|
OP unit redemption
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid to non-affiliated partnership unitholders
|
|
|
(2,764
|
)
|
|
|
(3,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(49,076
|
)
|
|
|
(37,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
283
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the year, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
26,155
|
|
|
$
|
21,738
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
33
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS CAPITAL AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Receivable due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Limited
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
from General
|
|
|
Non-Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
28,797
|
|
|
$
|
69,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,101,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,456
|
|
|
$
|
(3,153
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,197,753
|
|
|
$
|
(588,185
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,180
|
|
|
$
|
1,621,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(1,164
|
)
|
|
|
(1,516
|
)
|
|
|
(62,600
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Unit Redemptions for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reflect limited partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
5,960
|
|
|
|
7,995
|
|
|
|
(13,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(8,394
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,681
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(8,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(8,394
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
|
(11,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(11,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
33,508
|
|
|
$
|
75,240
|
|
|
$
|
2,016,746
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
|
$
|
(6,052
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,120,853
|
|
|
$
|
(576,136
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,556,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
34
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (UDR, L.P., the Operating Partnership, we or our) is a
Delaware limited partnership, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, redevelops, manages, and
disposes of multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets
located in the United States. The high barrier-to-entry markets are characterized by limited land
for new construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement process, expensive single-family home
prices and significant employment growth potential. UDR, L.P. is a subsidiary of UDR, Inc. (UDR
or the General Partner) , a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
and through which UDR conducts a significant portion of its business. During the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues of the Operating Partnership represented of 56% and 59% of the
General Partners consolidated revenues. At June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnerships apartment
portfolio consisted of 81 communities located in 19 markets consisting of 23,351 apartment homes.
Interests in UDR, L.P. are represented by Operating Partnership Units (OP Units). The
Operating Partnerships net income is allocated to the partners, which is initially based on their
respective distributions made during the year and secondly, their percentage interests.
Distributions are made in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership Agreement), on a
per unit basis that is generally equal to the dividend per share on UDRs common stock, which is
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol UDR.
As of June 30, 2010, there were 179,909,408 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding,
of which, 174,224,574 or 96.8% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 5,684,834 or 3.2%,
which were owned by non-affiliated limited partners. There were 179,909,408 OP units in the
Operating Partnership outstanding as of December 31, 2009 of which, 173,922,816 or 96.7% were owned
by UDR and affiliated entities and 5,986,592 or 3.3%, which were owned by non-affiliated limited
partners. See Note 9,
Capital Structure
.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed
or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of our financial
position as of June 30, 2010, and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The interim
results presented are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for a full year.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on September 30, 2010.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the interim unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts
realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
The Operating Partnership evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial
statements were issued. Except as noted in Note 13,
Subsequent Event
, no other recognized or
non-recognized subsequent events were noted.
35
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Policies
Real Estate Sales
For sales transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as
the Operating Partnership no longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the
related assets and liabilities from our consolidated balance sheet and record the gain or loss in
the period the transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale
criteria due to our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement
and account for the transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales of real estate to entities in which we retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted
for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual
method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize
profit proportionate to the interest of the buyer in the real estate and defer the gain on the
interest we retain in the real estate. The Operating Partnership will recognize any deferred gain
when the property is then sold to a third party. In transactions accounted by us as partial sales,
we determine if the buyer of the majority equity interest in the venture was provided a preference
as to cash flows in either an operating or a capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been
provided, we recognize profit only to the extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity
interest exceed costs related to the entire property.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 810,
Consolidation
(originally issued as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46(R)), which (1)
addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept from ASC 860,
Transfers and Servicing
(formerly SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities), and (2) responds to concerns about the application of
certain key provisions of ASC 810,
Consolidation
(formerly FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities), including concerns over the transparency of enterprises involvement with
variable interest entities. ASC 810 became effective for the Operating Partnership on January 1,
2010 and adoption had no impact on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or
disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements an amendment to ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures. This amendment provides for more robust disclosures about (1) the different
classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs
used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1,
2, and 3. ASU No. 2010-06 became effective for the Operating Partnership for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with one new disclosure effective after
December 15, 2010. See Note 7,
Fair Value of Derivatives and Financial Instruments
.
Income taxes
The taxable income or loss of the Operating Partnership is reported on the tax returns of the
partners. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes. The
Partnerships tax returns are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Net
income for financial reporting purposes differs from the net income for income tax reporting
purposes primarily due to temporary differences, principally real estate depreciation and the tax
deferral of certain gains on property sales. The differences in depreciation result from
differences in the book and tax basis of certain real estate assets and the differences in the
methods of depreciation and lives of the real estate assets.
The Operating Partnership adopted certain accounting guidance within ASC Topic 740,
Income
Taxes
, with respect to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the financial statements. The guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Operating Partnerships tax
returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the
applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would
be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management of the Operating
Partnership is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations,
for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. The Operating Partnership
has no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.
36
Management of the Operating Partnership has reviewed all open tax years and major
jurisdictions and concluded the adoption of the new accounting guidance resulted in no impact to
the Operating Partnerships financial position or results of operations. There is no tax liability
resulting from unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain income tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in future tax returns.
Earnings per OP unit
Basic earnings per OP Unit is computed by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to general
and limited partner units by the weighted average number of general and limited partner units
(including redeemable OP Units) outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per OP Unit reflects
the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue OP Units were
exercised or converted into OP Units or resulted in the issuance of OP Units that shared in the
earnings of the Operating Partnership. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
there were no dilutive instruments outstanding, and therefore, diluted earnings per OP Unit and
basic earnings per OP Unit are the same.
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Operating Partnership consists of income producing operating
properties and land held for future development. At June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership owned
and consolidated 81 communities in 8 states plus the District of Columbia totaling 23,351 apartment
homes. The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
987,735
|
|
|
$
|
985,126
|
|
Depreciable property held and used
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
2,549,755
|
|
|
|
2,525,812
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
|
108,094
|
|
Land held for future development
|
|
|
25,065
|
|
|
|
21,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment
|
|
|
3,675,055
|
|
|
|
3,640,888
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(800,852
|
)
|
|
|
(717,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned, net
|
|
$
|
2,874,203
|
|
|
$
|
2,922,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Operating Partnership did not have any acquisitions during the six months ended June 30,
2010.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations represent properties that the Operating Partnership has either sold or
which management believes meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. In order to be
classified as held for sale and reported as discontinued operations, a propertys operations and
cash flows have or will be divested to a third party by the Operating Partnership whereby UDR, L.P.
will not have any significant continuing involvement in the ownership or operation of the property
after the sale or disposition. The results of operations of the property are presented as
discontinued operations for all periods presented and do not impact the net earnings reported by
the Operating Partnership. Once a property is deemed as held for sale, depreciation is no longer
recorded. However, if the Operating Partnership determines that the property no longer meets the
criteria of held for sale, the Operating Partnership will recapture any unrecorded depreciation for
the property. The assets and liabilities of properties deemed as held for sale are presented
separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Properties deemed as held for sale are reported at
the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell the assets.
The Operating Partnership did not dispose of any communities during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, nor did we have any communities classified as held for disposition at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
the Operating Partnership recognized $37,000 and $97,000 and $1.4 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, of Income from Discontinued Operations which relate to residual activities from
sold communities.
37
5. DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of
classification in the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Operating Partnership
having effectively established the fixed interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured
debt consists of the following as of June 30, 2010 (
dollars in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Communities
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Years to Maturity
|
|
|
Encumbered
|
|
Fixed Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
$
|
229,572
|
|
|
$
|
230,852
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
587,403
|
|
|
|
587,403
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate secured debt
|
|
|
830,300
|
|
|
|
831,580
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Tax-exempt secured note payable
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
174,354
|
|
|
|
163,028
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate secured debt
|
|
|
301,944
|
|
|
|
290,618
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured debt
|
|
$
|
1,132,244
|
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie
Mae (FNMA) with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie
Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed
rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the
General Partners option. At June 30, 2010, $948.6 million of the funded balance was fixed at a
weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance of $260.5 million on these
facilities had a weighted average variable rate of 1.8%. $761.8 million of these credit facilities
were allocated to the Operating Partnership at June 30, 2010 based on the ownership of the assets
securing the debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding
|
|
$
|
761,757
|
|
|
$
|
750,431
|
|
Weighted average borrowings during the period
ended
|
|
|
759,728
|
|
|
|
646,895
|
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended
|
|
|
762,160
|
|
|
|
750,572
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during the
period ended
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Weighted average interest rate at the end of
the period
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
The Operating Partnership may from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt
instruments. In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair
value and amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life
of the underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair value adjustment of the fixed rate debt
instruments on the Operating Partnerships properties was a net discount of $1.2 million at June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
38
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable.
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from February 2011 through June
2016 and carry interest rates ranging from 5.03% to 5.94%.
Tax-exempt secured notes payable.
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt
housing bond issues mature in March 2031 and carry an interest rate of 5.30%. Interest on these
notes is payable in semi-annual installments.
Secured credit facilities.
At June 30, 2010, the General Partner had borrowings against its
fixed rate facilities of $948.6 million of which $587.4 million was allocated to the Operating
Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of June 30, 2010, the fixed
rate Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted average
fixed rate of interest of 5.30%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable.
Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from July 2013 through April
2016. Interest on the variable rate mortgage notes is based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which
translated into interest rates ranging from 1.17% to 3.98% at June 30, 2010.
Tax-exempt secured note payable.
The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures
tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly
installments. The mortgage note payable has an interest rate of 1.38% as of June 30, 2010.
Secured credit facilities.
At June 30, 2010, the General Partner had borrowings against its
variable rate facilities of $260.5 million of which $174.4 million was allocated to the Operating
Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of June 30, 2010, the
variable rate borrowings under the Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating
Partnership had a weighted average floating rate of interest of 2.01%.
The aggregate maturities of the Operating Partnerships secured debt due during each of the
next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Tax Exempt
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
2011
|
|
|
47,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,243
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,641
|
|
|
|
112,369
|
|
2012
|
|
|
49,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,849
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,529
|
|
|
|
236,618
|
|
2013
|
|
|
61,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,723
|
|
|
|
38,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,065
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
70,170
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
398,588
|
|
|
|
60,947
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
86,184
|
|
|
|
656,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
229,572
|
|
|
$
|
13,325
|
|
|
$
|
587,403
|
|
|
$
|
100,590
|
|
|
$
|
27,000
|
|
|
$
|
174,354
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor on Unsecured Debt
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partners unsecured credit facility,
with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $133.9 million and
$189.3 million, respectively.
39
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Receivable due from the General Partner
The Operating Partnership participates in the General Partners central cash management
program, wherein all the Operating Partnerships cash receipts are remitted to the General Partner
and all cash disbursements are funded by the General Partner. In addition, other miscellaneous
costs such as administrative expenses are incurred by the General Partner on behalf of the
Operating Partnership. As a result of these various transactions between the Operating Partnership
and the General Partner, the Operating Partnership had a net receivable balance of $576.1 million
and $588.2 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which is reflected as a
reduction in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The General Partner performs various general and administrative and other overhead services
for the Operating Partnership including legal assistance, acquisitions analysis, marketing and
advertising, and allocates these expenses to the Operating Partnership first on the basis of direct
usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated based on its pro-rata portion of UDRs total
apartment homes. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the general and
administrative expenses allocated to the Operating Partnership by UDR were $7.6 million and $15.1
million and $6.0 million and $12.4 million, respectively, and are included in General and
Administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. In the opinion of
management, this method of allocation reflects the level of services received by the Operating
Partnership from the General Partner.
Guaranty by the General Partner
The General Partner provided a bottom dollar guaranty to certain limited partners as part of
their original contribution to the Operating Partnership. The guaranty protects the tax basis of
the underlying contribution and is reflected on the OP unitholders Schedule K-1 tax form. The
guaranty was made in the form of a loan from the General Partner to the Operating Partnership at an
annual interest rate of 0.593% and 5.83% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Interest payments
are made monthly and the note is due December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
note payable due to the General Partner was $71.5 million.
7. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price
that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy prioritizes observable and unobservable
inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which
are described below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
entity has the ability to access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated with observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes
certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use
significant unobservable inputs.
|
40
The estimated fair values of the Operating Partnerships financial instruments either recorded
or disclosed on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as
follows
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2010 Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets or
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
|
|
$
|
5,662
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,662
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contingent purchase consideration (c)
|
|
|
6,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,037
|
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
244,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,742
|
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
|
|
|
15,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,444
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
609,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,562
|
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
174,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,183,391
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,662
|
|
|
$
|
1,177,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2009 Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets or
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
239,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,814
|
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
592,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,783
|
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,590
|
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities
|
|
|
163,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,140,587
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
$
|
1,136,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
See Note 5,
Debt
|
|
(b)
|
|
See Note 8,
Derivatives and Hedging Activity
|
|
(c)
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership accrued a liability of $6.0 million related to
a contingent purchase consideration on one of its properties. The contingent consideration was
determined based on the fair market value of the related asset which is estimated using Level
3 inputs utilized in a third party appraisal.
|
41
Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected
variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate
curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard
methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest
rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation
of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from
observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
The Operating Partnership incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect
both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair
value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Operating Partnership has considered the impact of netting and any
applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and
guarantees.
Although the Operating Partnership has determined that the majority of the inputs used to
value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation
adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current
credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership has assessed the significance of
the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions
and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall
valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Operating Partnership has determined that its
derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
At June 30, 2010, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable, security deposits and
prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because
of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial
instruments were determined by the Operating Partnership using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data
and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Operating Partnership would realize on the disposition of the
financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have
a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The General Partner estimates the fair value of our debt instruments by discounting the
remaining cash flows of the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market
credit spread plus the corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a
replacement market credit spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit
spreads, time remaining to maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
The Operating Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations
when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash
flows estimated to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less
than the net book value of those assets. Cash flow estimates are based upon historical results
adjusted to reflect managements best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our
estimated holding periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair value. The
General Partners estimates of fair value represent managements estimates based upon Level 3
inputs such as industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.
42
8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Operating Partnership is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations
and economic conditions. The General Partner principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of
business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The General
Partner manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by
managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative
financial instruments. Specifically, the General Partner enters into derivative financial
instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or
payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest
rates. The General Partners and the Operating Partnerships derivative financial instruments are
used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the General Partners known or
expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the General
Partners investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The General Partners objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to
interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this
objective, the General Partner primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the
receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the General Partner making
fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional
amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in
exchange for an up front premium.
A portion of the General Partners interest rate derivatives have been allocated to the
Operating Partnership based on the General Partners underlying debt instruments allocated to the
Operating Partnership. (See Note 5,
Debt.
)
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, such derivatives
were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The
ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in
earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Operating Partnership
recorded less than $1,000 of ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and index
mismatches between the derivative and the hedged item.
Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) related to derivatives
will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the General Partners
variable-rate debt that is allocated to the Operating Partnership. Through June 30, 2011, we
estimate that an additional $3.1 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
As of June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership had the following outstanding interest rate
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (
dollar amounts in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
267,790
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
109,275
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Companys
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements of FASB ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
(formerly SFAS 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities). Changes in the fair value of derivatives not
designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in losses of
$182,000 and $675,000 and gains of $643,000 and $601,000 for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding derivatives
that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships (
dollar amounts in
thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
218,815
|
|
43
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Operating Partnerships derivative financial
instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at:
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Sheet Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Sheet Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
1,046
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,662
|
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,662
|
|
|
$
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not
designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
not
designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The tables below present the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(
dollar amounts in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into
|
|
from Accumulated OCI into Income
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging
|
|
OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Income (Effective
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Relationships
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
$
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
$
|
(1,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,931
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(4,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
in Income on Derivative
|
|
Instruments
|
|
Derivative
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other income / (expense)
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products
|
|
Other income / (expense)
|
|
$
|
(675
|
)
|
|
$
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(675
|
)
|
|
$
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The General Partner has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a
provision where (1) if the General Partner defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default
where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the General
Partner could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the General Partner
could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying
indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the General Partners default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the General Partner s agreements with its derivative counterparties contain
provisions where if there is a change in the General Partners financial condition that materially
changes the General Partner s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the General Partner may be
required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The General Partner also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the
loan and financial covenant provisions of the General Partners indebtedness with a lender
affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would
result in the General Partner being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by
the agreement.
As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position that were
allocated to the Operating Partnership, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment
for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $6.2 million. As of June 30, 2010, the
General Partner has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the General Partner
had breached any of these provisions at June 30, 2010, it would have been required to settle its
obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $6.2 million.
9. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
General Partnership Units
The General Partner has complete discretion to manage and control the operations and business
of the Operating Partnership, which includes but is not limited to the acquisition and disposition
of real property, construction of buildings and making capital improvements, and the borrowing of
funds from outside lenders or UDR and its subsidiaries to finance such activities. The General
Partner can authorize, issue, sell, redeem or purchase any OP unit or securities of the Operating
Partnership without the approval of the limited partners. The General Partner can also approve,
with regard to the issuances of OP units, the class or one or more series of classes, with
designations, preferences, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties
including rights, powers and duties senior to limited partnership interests without approval of any
limited partners. There were 110,883 OP units of general partnership interest at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, all of which were held by UDR.
Limited Partnership Units
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were 179,798,525 OP units outstanding, of which
1,751,671 were Class A Limited Partnership units. UDR owned 174,113,691 or 96.8% and 173,811,933 or
96.7% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The remaining 5,684,834 or 3.2% and
5,986,592 or 3.3% OP units outstanding were held by non- affiliated partners at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 of which 1,751,671, respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership units.
45
The limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a
portion of the OP units held by the limited partner at a redemption price equal to and in the form
of the Cash Amount (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement), provided that such OP Units
have been outstanding for at least one year. UDR, as general partner of the Operating Partnership
may, in its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash
Amount or the REIT Share Amount (generally one share of common stock of UDR for each OP Unit), as
defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement.
The non-affiliated limited partners capital is adjusted to redemption value at the end of
each reporting period with the corresponding offset against the UDR limited partner capital account
based on the redemption rights note above. The aggregate value upon redemption of the
then-outstanding OP units held by limited partners was $108.7 million and $98.4 million as of June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, based on the value of UDRs common stock at each
period end. Once an OP unit has been redeemed, the redeeming partner has no right to receive any
distributions from the Operating Partnership on or after the date of redemption.
Class A Limited Partnership Units
Class A Partnership units have a cumulative annual, non-compounded preferred return, which is
equal to 8% based on a value of $16.61 per Class A Limited Partnership unit.
Holders of the Class A Limited Partnership units exclusively possess certain voting rights.
The Operating Partnership may not perform the following without approval of the holders of the
Class A Partnership units: (i) increase the authorized or issued amount of Class A Partnership
units, (ii) reclassify any other partnership interest into Class A Partnership units, (iii) create,
authorize or issue any obligations or security convertible into or the right to purchase any Class
Partnership units, without the approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership units, (iv) enter
into a merger or acquisition, or (v) amend or modify the Operating Partnership Agreement that
affects the rights, preferences or privileges of the Class A Partnership units.
Allocation of profits and losses
Profit of the Operating Partnership is allocated in the following order: (i) to the General
Partner and the Limited Partners in proportion to and up to the amount of cash distributions made
during the year, and (ii) to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their
percentage interests. Losses and depreciation and amortization expenses, non-recourse liabilities
are allocated to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage
interests. Losses allocated to the Limited Partners are capped to the extent that such an
allocation would not cause a deficit in the Limited Partners capital account. Such losses are,
therefore, allocated to the General Partner. If any Partners capital balance were to fall into a
deficit any income and gains are allocated to each Partner sufficient to eliminate its negative
capital balance.
10. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, comprehensive income/(loss)
consisted of unrealized gain/(loss) from derivative financial instruments of ($1.5 million) and
($2.9 million) and $3.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income/(loss)
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was ($5.8 million) and ($11.5 million)
and $5.9 million and $9.2 million, respectively.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
The Operating Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the
ordinary course of business. The Operating Partnership cannot determine the ultimate liability with
respect to such legal proceedings and claims at this time. The General Partner believes that such
liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material
adverse effect on the Operating Partnerships financial condition, results of operations or cash
flow.
46
12. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 280,
Segment Reporting
(formerly SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information) (Topic 280), requires that segment disclosures present the
measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for
purposes of assessing such segments performance. The Operating Partnership has the same chief
operating decision maker as that of its parent, the General Partner. The chief operating decision
maker consists of several members of UDRs executive management team who use several generally
accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business for our reportable
operating segments.
The Operating Partnership owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the
United States that generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of
apartment homes to a diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures of the Operating
Partnerships apartment communities are rental income and net operating income (NOI), and are
included in the chief operating decision makers assessment of UDRs performance on a consolidated
basis. Rental income represents gross market rent less adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss
and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less direct property operating expenses. The chief
operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key measure of segment profit or loss.
The Operating Partnerships two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other
communities:
|
|
|
Same store communities
represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized
prior to April 1, 2009, and held as of June 30, 2010. A comparison of operating results from
the prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy
and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct
substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within
the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves
90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months.
|
|
|
|
Non-mature/other communities
represent those communities that were acquired or developed
in 2008, 2009 or 2010, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as
real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties, joint venture
properties, properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of mixed
use properties.
|
Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community
and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the
aggregation criteria of Topic 280 as each of our apartment communities generally has similar
economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Operating Partnerships
reportable segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is
provided to the chief operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants
contributed 10% or more of the Operating Partnerships total revenues during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
47
The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as
those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The following table
details rental income and NOI for the Operating Partnerships reportable segments for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and reconciles NOI to income from continuing and
discontinued operations per the consolidated statement of operations
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment rental income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
$
|
49,839
|
|
|
$
|
52,119
|
|
|
$
|
99,259
|
|
|
$
|
104,367
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
14,863
|
|
|
|
14,556
|
|
|
|
29,459
|
|
|
|
29,121
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
10,209
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
20,379
|
|
|
|
20,766
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
6,591
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
|
|
13,165
|
|
|
|
13,536
|
|
Non-Mature communities/Other
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
11,033
|
|
|
|
11,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental income
|
|
$
|
87,095
|
|
|
$
|
89,399
|
|
|
$
|
173,295
|
|
|
$
|
179,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment NOI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
$
|
34,548
|
|
|
$
|
37,097
|
|
|
$
|
68,478
|
|
|
$
|
74,150
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
10,158
|
|
|
|
10,305
|
|
|
|
19,984
|
|
|
|
20,042
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
6,415
|
|
|
|
6,516
|
|
|
|
12,828
|
|
|
|
13,184
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
8,188
|
|
|
|
8,298
|
|
Non-Mature communities/Other
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
3,979
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
7,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated NOI
|
|
|
59,237
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
116,754
|
|
|
|
123,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
(2,395
|
)
|
|
|
(2,458
|
)
|
|
|
(4,766
|
)
|
|
|
(4,930
|
)
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
(2,468
|
)
|
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(41,693
|
)
|
|
|
(41,437
|
)
|
|
|
(83,123
|
)
|
|
|
(83,290
|
)
|
Interest
|
|
|
(12,966
|
)
|
|
|
(13,560
|
)
|
|
|
(26,041
|
)
|
|
|
(25,113
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
|
(3,724
|
)
|
|
|
(10,655
|
)
|
|
|
(7,811
|
)
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Net gain on the sale of real estate
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders
|
|
$
|
(4,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
(8,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
The following table details the assets of the Operating Partnerships reportable segments as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
$
|
2,132,392
|
|
|
$
|
2,124,693
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
677,772
|
|
|
|
675,223
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
352,290
|
|
|
|
350,084
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
253,383
|
|
|
|
251,778
|
|
Non-Mature communities/Other
|
|
|
259,218
|
|
|
|
239,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
|
3,675,055
|
|
|
|
3,640,888
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(800,852
|
)
|
|
|
(717,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets net book value
|
|
|
2,874,203
|
|
|
|
2,922,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
8,083
|
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18,649
|
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
2,908,591
|
|
|
$
|
2,961,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures related to the Operating Partnerships same communities totaled $8.1
million and $13.1 million and $8.8 million and $16.7 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capital expenditures related to the Operating Partnerships
non-mature/other communities totaled $105,000 and $212,000 and $417,000 and $790,000 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
|
i.
|
|
Western Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, Seattle,
Sacramento, Inland Empire, Portland, and San Diego
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Metropolitan DC and Baltimore
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
Southeastern Nashville, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Other Florida
|
|
|
iv.
|
|
Southwestern Dallas and Phoenix
|
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding securities of
the General Partner (the Guarantees). The Guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as
primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder
of the applicable securities and to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the
respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by
acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture
whether for principal of or interest on the securities, (and premium if any) and all other monetary
obligations of UDR under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities and
(b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations
of the General Partner under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities.
49
EXHIBIT 99.4
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF UNITED
DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and
dispositions, development activity and capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent
growth, occupancy, and rental expense growth. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, unanticipated
adverse business developments affecting us, or our properties, adverse changes in the real estate
markets and general and local economies and business conditions. Although we believe that the
assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the
assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements included in this Report may not
prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking
statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a
representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such
statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Business Overview
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership or UDR, L.P.), is a Delaware
limited partnership formed in February 2004 and organized pursuant to the provisions of the
Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (as amended from time to time, or any successor to
such statute, the Act). The Operating Partnership is the successor-in-interest to United
Dominion Realty, L.P., a limited partnership formed under the laws of Virginia, which commenced
operations on November 4, 1995. Our sole general partner is UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation
(UDR or the General Partner), which conducts a substantial amount of its business and holds a
substantial amount of its assets through the Operating Partnership. At June 30, 2010, the
Operating Partnerships real estate portfolio included 81 communities located in 8 states plus the
District of Columbia, with a total of 23,351 apartment homes.
As of June 30, 2010, UDR owned 110,883 units of our general limited partnership interests and
174,113,691 units of our limited partnership interests (the OP Units), or approximately 96.8% of
our outstanding OP Units. By virtue of its ownership of our OP Units and being our sole general
partner, UDR has the ability to control all of the day-to-day operations of the Operating
Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references
in this Report to the Operating Partnership or we, us or our refer to UDR, L.P. together with
its consolidated subsidiaries. We refer to our General Partner together with its consolidated
subsidiaries (including us) and the General Partners consolidated joint ventures as UDR or the
General Partner.
UDR operates as a self administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income
tax purposes. UDR focuses on owning, acquiring, renovating, developing, and managing apartment
communities nationwide. The General Partner was formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation and
changed its state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland in June 2003. At June 30, 2010, the
General Partners consolidated real estate portfolio included 168 communities located in 10 states
and the District of Columbia, with a total of 46,932 apartment homes, and its total real estate
portfolio, inclusive of its unconsolidated communities, included an additional 11 communities with
4,143 apartment homes.
Special Dividend
On November 5, 2008, UDRs Board of Directors declared a dividend on a pre-adjusted basis of
$1.29 per share (the Special Dividend). The Special Dividend was paid on January 29, 2009 to
UDRs stockholders of record on December 9, 2008, which also includes the Operating Partnerships
unit holders. The dividend represented UDRs fourth quarter recurring distribution of $0.33 per
share and an additional special distribution of $0.96 per share due to taxable income arising from
our dispositions occurring during the year. Subject to the General Partners right to pay the
entire Special Dividend in cash, its stockholders had the option to make an election to receive
payment in cash or in shares, however, the aggregate amount of cash payable to stockholders, other
than cash payable in lieu of fractional shares, would not be less than $44.0 million.
The Special Dividend, totaling $177.1 million, was paid on 137,266,557 shares issued and
outstanding of UDRs stock on the record date. Approximately $133.1 million of the Special
Dividend was paid through the issuance of 11,358,042 shares of common stock, which was determined
based on the volume weighted average closing sales price of UDRs common stock of $11.71 per share
on the NYSE on January 21, 2009 and January 22, 2009. The Operating Partnership issued an
additional 13,746,221 OP units in January 2009 in connection with the Special Dividend.
The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of June
30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Total Income
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Total Income
|
|
|
|
Apartment
|
|
|
Apartment
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Physical
|
|
|
per Occupied
|
|
|
Physical
|
|
|
per Occupied
|
|
Same Communities
|
|
Communities
|
|
|
Homes
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Home (b)
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Home (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Co, CA
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
763,069
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
391,283
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
Monterey Peninsula, CA
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
151,777
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
264,540
|
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
99,326
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
206,397
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
Inland Empire, CA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
118,987
|
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
Sacramento, CA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
67,721
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
%
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
93.4
|
%
|
|
|
868
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
69,292
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan DC
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
532,831
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
96.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
144,941
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
108,321
|
|
|
|
96.0
|
%
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
%
|
|
|
997
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
125,876
|
|
|
|
97.1
|
%
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
96.6
|
%
|
|
|
820
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
42,136
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
%
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
842
|
|
Other Florida
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
75,957
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwestern Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
182,053
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
71,330
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
%
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
95.5
|
%
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average Same Communities
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
22,104
|
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,415,837
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Matures, Commercial Properties & Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
259,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Held for Investment
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
23,351
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
3,675,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(800,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned, Net of
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,874,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
There was no change in the Same Community population for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Total Income per Occupied Home represents total monthly revenues per weighted average
number of apartment homes occupied.
|
2
The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Home Size
|
|
|
|
Apartment
|
|
|
Apartment
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Cost per
|
|
|
Physical
|
|
|
(in Square
|
|
|
|
Communities
|
|
|
Homes
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Home
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Feet)
|
|
WESTERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange County, CA
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
761,297
|
|
|
$
|
327,274
|
|
|
$
|
184,602
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
820
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
517,731
|
|
|
|
101,167
|
|
|
|
223,642
|
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
|
|
806
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
263,664
|
|
|
|
65,814
|
|
|
|
215,764
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
967
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
205,759
|
|
|
|
38,387
|
|
|
|
220,771
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
865
|
|
Monterey Peninsula, CA
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
150,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,440
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
%
|
|
|
724
|
|
Inland Empire, CA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
118,709
|
|
|
|
53,773
|
|
|
|
142,337
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
%
|
|
|
882
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,641
|
|
|
|
21,996
|
|
|
|
143,165
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
788
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
68,711
|
|
|
|
46,933
|
|
|
|
95,965
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
|
|
918
|
|
Sacramento, CA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
67,384
|
|
|
|
48,563
|
|
|
|
73,724
|
|
|
|
93.4
|
%
|
|
|
820
|
|
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan DC
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
570,358
|
|
|
|
134,023
|
|
|
|
222,362
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
948
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
144,059
|
|
|
|
82,818
|
|
|
|
144,929
|
|
|
|
87.5
|
%
|
|
|
971
|
|
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
125,023
|
|
|
|
20,204
|
|
|
|
77,558
|
|
|
|
95.5
|
%
|
|
|
925
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
107,438
|
|
|
|
10,185
|
|
|
|
93,101
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
Other Florida
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
75,656
|
|
|
|
40,133
|
|
|
|
118,956
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
41,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,920
|
|
|
|
93.6
|
%
|
|
|
964
|
|
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
181,271
|
|
|
|
95,265
|
|
|
|
134,474
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
909
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
70,507
|
|
|
|
35,663
|
|
|
|
77,141
|
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
27,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,148
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
%
|
|
|
883
|
|
Other Texas
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
13,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,419
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating
Communities
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
23,351
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
%
|
|
|
3,609,487
|
|
|
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
|
154,575
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
%
|
|
|
887
|
|
Land and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
31,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
23,351
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,640,888
|
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through
operating cash flows, the sale of properties, and the issuance of debt. Both the coordination of
asset and liability maturities and effective capital management are important to the maintenance of
liquidity. The Operating Partnerships primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations as
determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and operating expenses related to our portfolio of
apartment homes and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partners credit agreements. The
General Partner will routinely use its unsecured credit facility to temporarily fund certain
investing and financing activities prior to arranging for longer-term financing or the issuance of
equity or debt securities. During the past several years, proceeds from the sale of real estate
have been used for both investing and financing activities as we repositioned our portfolio.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partners credit agreements. We expect
to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such as scheduled debt maturities and potential
property acquisitions through borrowings and the disposition of properties. We believe that our net
cash provided by operations and borrowings will continue to be adequate to meet both operating
requirements and the payment of distributions. Likewise, the budgeted expenditures for improvements
and renovations of certain properties are expected to be funded from property operations and
borrowings allocated to us under the General Partners credit agreements the Operating Partnership
is a party to.
Future Capital Needs
Future capital expenditures are expected to be funded with proceeds from the issuance of
secured debt, the sale of properties, the borrowings allocated to us under our General Partners
credit agreements, and to a lesser extent, with cash flows provided by operating activities.
Acquisition activity in strategic markets is expected to be largely financed by the reinvestment of
proceeds from the sale of properties, the issuance of OP units and the assumption or placement of
secured debt.
During the remainder of 2010, we have approximately $1.4 million of secured debt maturing and
we anticipate that we will repay that debt with operating cash flows, proceeds from borrowings
allocated to us under our General Partners credit agreements, or by exercising extension rights on
such secured debt, as applicable. The repayment of debt will be recorded as an offset to the
Receivable due from General Partner.
3
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use
judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. A
critical accounting policy is one that is both important to our financial condition and results of
operations and that involves some degree of uncertainty. Estimates are prepared based on
managements assessment after considering all evidence available. Changes in estimates could affect
our financial position or results of operations. Below is a discussion of the accounting policies
that we consider critical to understanding our financial condition or results of operations where
there is uncertainty or where significant judgment is required.
Capital Expenditures
In conformity with GAAP, we capitalize those expenditures that materially enhance the value of
an existing asset or substantially extend the useful life of an existing asset. Expenditures
necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as
incurred.
During the six month ended June 30, 2010, $28.2 million was spent on capital expenditures for
all of our communities as compared to $32.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. During
2009, $70.4 million was spent on capital expenditures for all of our communities as compared to
$84.3 million in 2008 and $92.2 million in 2007. These capital improvements included
turnover-related capital expenditures, revenue enhancing capital expenditures, asset preservation
expenditures, kitchen and bath upgrades, other extensive interior/exterior upgrades and major
renovations.
We will continue to selectively add revenue enhancing improvements which we believe will
provide a return on investment substantially in excess of our cost of capital.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and
circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated
to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less than the net book
value of those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to
reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding
periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair market value. Our estimates of
fair market value represent our best estimate based upon industry trends and reference to market
rates and transactions.
Real Estate Investment Properties
We purchase real estate investment properties from time to time and allocate the purchase
price to various components, such as land, buildings, and intangibles related to in-place leases in
accordance with FASB ASC 805,
Business Combinations
(formerly SFAS 141R, Business Combinations).
The purchase price is allocated based on the relative fair value of each component. The fair value
of buildings is determined as if the buildings were vacant upon acquisition and subsequently leased
at market rental rates. As such, the determination of fair value considers the present value of all
cash flows expected to be generated from the property including an initial lease-up period. We
determine the fair value of in-place leases by assessing the net effective rent and remaining term
of the lease relative to market terms for similar leases at acquisition. In addition, we consider
the cost of acquiring similar leases, the foregone rents associated with the lease-up period, and
the carrying costs associated with the lease-up period. The fair value of in-place leases is
recorded and amortized as amortization expense over the remaining contractual lease period.
Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities,
and net cash used in investing activities and financing activities that are presented in our
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash flow provided by operating activities was
$77.2 million compared to $69.8 million for the comparable period in 2009. The increase in net cash
flow from operating activities is primarily due to the changes in operating assets and liabilities,
partially offset by a decrease in property net operating income from our apartment community
portfolio, a decrease in interest income related to a $200 million note receivable that was paid
off during 2009 and higher interest expense.
4
Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash used in investing activities was $28.2
million compared to $32.2 million for the comparable period in 2009. The decrease is due to a
reduction in capital expenditures.
Acquisitions
The Operating Partnership did not acquire any communities during the six months ended June 30,
2010 or during 2009. The Operating Partnerships long-term strategic plan is to achieve greater
operating efficiencies by investing in fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been
seeking to expand our interests in communities located in California, Metropolitan Washington D.C.
and the Washington State markets over the past years. Prospectively, we plan to continue to channel
new investments into those markets we believe will continue to provide the best investment returns.
Markets will be targeted based upon defined criteria including favorable job formation, low
single-family home affordability and favorable demand/supply ratio for multifamily housing.
Dispositions
The Operating Partnership did not dispose of any communities during the six months ended June
30, 2010 or 2009.
Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net cash used in financing activities was $49.1
million compared to $37.3 million for the comparable period of 2009. The increase in cash used in
financing activities was primarily due to a decrease in the proceeds from secured debt, partially
offset by a net decrease in payments to the General Partner and a decrease in payments on secured
debt.
Credit Facilities
As of June 30, 2010, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie
Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae
credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates,
and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General
Partners option. At June 30, 2010, $948.6 million of the funded balance was fixed at a weighted
average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a weighted
average variable rate of 1.8%. At June 30, 2010, $761.8 million of these credit facilities are
allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partners unsecured credit facility,
with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $133.9 million and
$189.3 million, respectively.
The credit facilities are subject to customary financial covenants and limitations.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing
debt that has to be refinanced. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes, but rather issue these financial instruments to finance our portfolio of real
estate assets. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest
rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Our earnings are affected
as changes in short-term interest rates impact our cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed
rate debt. We had $301.9 million in variable rate debt that is not subject to interest rate swap
contracts as of June 30, 2010. If market interest rates for variable rate debt increased by 100
basis points, our interest expense would increase by $3.0 million based on the balance at June 30,
2010.
These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our
borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the adjusted level of overall
economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of
such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the
change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their
possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.
5
A presentation of cash flow metrics based on GAAP is as follows (
dollars in thousands
):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
77,240
|
|
|
$
|
69,839
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(28,248
|
)
|
|
|
(32,290
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(49,076
|
)
|
|
|
(37,266
|
)
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities and
investing activities, and net cash used in financing activities that are presented in our
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
Operating Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash flow provided by operating activities was
$157.3 million compared to $168.7 million for 2008. The decrease in net cash flow from operating
activities is primarily due to a decrease in property net operating income from our apartment
community portfolio, a decrease in interest income related to a $200 million note receivable that
was paid off during 2009 and higher interest expense, partially offset by a decrease in other
operating liabilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, our net cash flow provided by operating activities was
$168.7 million compared to $212.7 million for 2007. During 2008, the decrease in cash flow from
operating activities resulted primarily from a reduction in property net operating income from our
apartment community portfolio. The reduction in property net operating income was driven by the
sale of a significant component of our portfolio in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was
partially offset by higher interest income during 2008 due to a $200 million note receivable issued
in conjunction with the dispositions.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by investing activities was $129.6
million compared to $82.0 million for 2008. The increase in cash is primarily driven by the
proceeds from a $200 million note receivable in 2009 and a reduction in acquisition activity and
capital expenditures in 2009 as compared to 2008. This is partially offset by the proceeds from
dispositions of $880 million in 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash provided by investing activities was $82.0
million compared to $75.1 million for 2007. The increase in cash is primarily due to acquisition
and disposition activity and capital expenditures, all of which are discussed in further detail
throughout this Report.
Acquisitions
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had no property acquisitions. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, we acquired nine apartment communities with 3,348 apartment homes for aggregate
consideration of $713.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we acquired four apartment
communities with 943 apartment homes for aggregate consideration of $236.9 million. The Operating
Partnerships long-term strategic plan is to achieve greater operating efficiencies by investing in
fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been expanding our interests in communities
located in California, Florida, Metropolitan Washington D.C. and the Washington State markets over
the past years. Prospectively, we plan to continue to channel new investments into those markets we
believe will continue to provide the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted based upon
defined criteria including favorable job formation, low single-family home affordability and
favorable demand/supply ratio for multifamily housing.
6
Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not dispose of any communities. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, we sold 55 communities with a total of 16,960 apartment homes, for
net proceeds of $880.0 million. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $475.2
million on these sales. Proceeds from the sales were used primarily to acquire new communities,
reduce debt, and advance funds to our General Partner.
In conjunction with this transaction, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership received a
note in the amount of $200.0 million. The note was paid in full during the year ended December 31,
2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Operating Partnership sold 12 communities with a
total of 4,461 apartment homes and a parcel of land for net proceeds of $404.2 million. We
recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $143.4 million on these sales. Proceeds from
the sales were used primarily to reduce debt and advance funds to our General Partner.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash used in financing activities was $290.1
million compared to $247.2 million for the comparable period of 2008. The increase in cash used in
financing activities was primarily due to a net increase in payments to the General Partner, which
was partially offset by the net activity on secured debt.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, our net cash used in financing activities was $247.2
million compared to $287.8 million for the comparable period of 2007. The decrease in financing
activities was primarily due to increased borrowings on secured debt in 2008 partially offset by
the increased payments to the General Partner and increased payments on secured debt in 2008.
Credit Facilities
As of December 31, 2009, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with
Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie
Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed
rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the
General Partners option. There is $950.0 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average
interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a weighted average
variable rate of 1.7%. $750.4 million of these credit facilities allocated to the Operating
Partnership at December 31, 2009 based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
As of December 31, 2008, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with
Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.0 billion with $831.2 million outstanding. The Fannie
Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed
rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the
General Partners option. There was $666.6 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted
average interest rate of 5.5% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a weighted
average variable rate of 3.1%. Approximately $484.8 million of these credit facilities were
allocated to the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2008 based on the ownership of the assets
securing the debt.
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partners unsecured credit facility,
with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At December
31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $189.3 million.
The credit facilities are subject to customary financial covenants and limitations.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing
debt that has to be refinanced. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes, but rather issue these financial instruments to finance our portfolio of real
estate assets. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest
rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Our earnings are affected
as changes in short-term interest rates impact our cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed
rate debt. We had $290.6 million in variable rate debt that is not subject to interest rate swap
contracts as of December 31, 2009. If market interest rates for variable rate debt increased by 100
basis points, our interest expense would increase by $2.9 million based on the balance at December
31, 2009.
7
These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our
borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the adjusted level of overall
economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of
such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the
change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their
possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.
A presentation of cash flow metrics based on GAAP is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
157,333
|
|
|
$
|
168,660
|
|
|
$
|
212,727
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
129,628
|
|
|
|
81,993
|
|
|
|
75,069
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(290,109
|
)
|
|
|
(247,150
|
)
|
|
|
(287,847
|
)
|
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The following discussion explains the changes in results of operations that are presented in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and includes the
results of both continuing and discontinued operations for the periods presented.
Net (Loss)/Income Attributable to OP Unit holders
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders was ($4.2) million (($0.02) per OP unit) for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to net income attributable to OP unit holders of
$2.8 million ($0.02 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net
income attributable to OP unit holders for the three months ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily
from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this
Report:
|
|
|
a decrease in net operating income;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income and increase
in losses due to changes in the fair value of derivatives;
|
|
|
|
a reduction in disposition gains in 2010 as compared to 2009. The Company recognized net
gains of $37,000 and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in general and administrative expenses allocated to us by our General
Partner.
|
These changes were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in
the interest rate on the note payable to the General Partner.
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders was ($8.7) million (($0.05) per OP unit) for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to net income attributable to OP unit holders of
$6.7 million ($0.04 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net
income attributable to OP unit holders for the six months ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily
from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this
Report:
|
|
|
a decrease in net operating income;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income and increase
in losses due to changes in the fair value of derivatives;
|
|
|
|
an increase in interest expense incurred on new debt;
|
8
|
|
|
a reduction in disposition gains in 2010 as compared to 2009. The Company recognized net
gains of $97,000 and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in general and administrative expenses allocated to us by our General
Partner.
|
These changes were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in
the interest rate on the note payable to the General Partner.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007
The following discussion explains the changes in results of operations that are presented in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2009, and includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations for the periods
presented.
Net (Loss)/Income Attributable to OP Unit holders
2009 -vs-2008
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders was ($4.2) million (($0.02) per OP unit) for
the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to net income attributable to OP unit holders of
$497.7 million ($3.00 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net
income attributable to OP unit holders for the year ended December 31, 2009 resulted primarily from
the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
|
|
|
a reduction in disposition gains in 2009 as compared to 2008. The Company recognized net
gains of $1.5 million and $475.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in net operating income due to the disposition of properties in 2008;
|
|
|
|
an increase in interest expense incurred on new debt;
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the acquisition of operating
properties in 2008; and
|
|
|
|
a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income.
|
2008 -vs-2007
Net income attributable to OP unit holders was $497.7 million ($3.00 per OP unit) for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $193.7 million ($1.17 per OP unit) for the comparable period
in the prior year. The increase in net income attributable to OP unit holders for the year ended
December 31, 2008 resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in
further detail elsewhere within this Report:
|
|
|
an increase of $331.8 million in the gains on the disposition of our property inclusive
of gains on sale to a joint venture; and
|
|
|
|
an increase of $13.0 million related to interest income generated by the Operating
Partnership;
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease in net operating income due to the disposition of properties in 2007 and
2008;
|
|
|
|
an increase in interest expense incurred on new debt; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense.
|
9
Apartment Community Operations
Our net income is primarily generated from the operation of our apartment communities.
The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio for
the three months and six months ended June 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Property rental income
|
|
$
|
87,095
|
|
|
$
|
89,399
|
|
|
|
-2.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
173,295
|
|
|
$
|
179,260
|
|
|
|
-3.3
|
%
|
Property operating expense (a)
|
|
|
(27,858
|
)
|
|
|
(27,443
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
(56,541
|
)
|
|
|
(55,862
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income
(NOI)
|
|
$
|
59,237
|
|
|
$
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
-4.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
116,754
|
|
|
$
|
123,398
|
|
|
|
-5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses.
|
The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net income attributable to OP
unit holders as reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the the three
months and six months ended June 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income
|
|
$
|
59,237
|
|
|
$
|
61,956
|
|
|
$
|
116,754
|
|
|
$
|
123,398
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(41,693
|
)
|
|
|
(41,437
|
)
|
|
|
(83,123
|
)
|
|
|
(83,290
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12,966
|
)
|
|
|
(13,560
|
)
|
|
|
(26,041
|
)
|
|
|
(25,113
|
)
|
General and administrative and property
management
|
|
|
(7,678
|
)
|
|
|
(6,182
|
)
|
|
|
(15,421
|
)
|
|
|
(12,741
|
)
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
(2,468
|
)
|
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of real estate
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(4,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
(8,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property rental income
|
|
$
|
353,056
|
|
|
$
|
362,012
|
|
|
|
-2.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
362,012
|
|
|
$
|
445,198
|
|
|
|
-18.7
|
%
|
Property operating expense (a)
|
|
|
(112,488
|
)
|
|
|
(115,972
|
)
|
|
|
-3.0
|
%
|
|
|
(115,972
|
)
|
|
|
(151,147
|
)
|
|
|
-23.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income
(NOI)
|
|
$
|
240,568
|
|
|
$
|
246,040
|
|
|
|
-2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
246,040
|
|
|
$
|
294,051
|
|
|
|
-16.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses.
|
10
The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net income attributable to OP
unit holders as reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income
|
|
$
|
240,568
|
|
|
$
|
246,040
|
|
|
$
|
294,051
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
13,106
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(166,773
|
)
|
|
|
(154,584
|
)
|
|
|
(158,533
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(53,547
|
)
|
|
|
(47,139
|
)
|
|
|
(47,367
|
)
|
General and administrative and property management
|
|
|
(26,595
|
)
|
|
|
(29,037
|
)
|
|
|
(35,276
|
)
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(4,868
|
)
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property to a
joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,433
|
|
Net gain on sale of real estate
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
475,249
|
|
|
|
44,976
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
|
|
$
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
497,720
|
|
|
$
|
193,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs. Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to April 1, 2009
and held on June 30, 2010) consisted of 22,104 apartment homes and provided 93.2% of our total NOI
for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
NOI for our same store community properties decreased 4.8% or $2.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in property NOI was
primarily attributable to a 2.6% or $2.2 million decrease in property rental income and by a 2.3%
or $586,000 increase in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by a
4.0% or $3.3 million decrease in rental rates which was partially offset by a 46.7% or $286,000
decrease in bad debt, a 10.1% or $327,000 decrease in vacancy loss, and a 13.4% or $464,000
increase in reimbursement income. Physical occupancy increased 0.5% to 95.9% and total income per
occupied home decreased $41 to $1,282 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 3.0% or $258,000
increase in real estate taxes and a 3.8% or $237,000 increase in personnel costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
was 67.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 69.3% for the comparable period
in 2009.
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2009
and held on June 30, 2010) consisted of 22,104 apartment homes and provided 93.8% of our total NOI
for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
NOI for our same store community properties decreased 5.4% or $6.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in property NOI was primarily
attributable to a 3.3% or $5.5 million decrease in property rental income and a 1.3% or $671,000
increase in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by a 4.9% or $8.0
million decrease in rental rates partially offset by a 40.8% or $485,000 decrease in bad debt, a
19.6% or $1.4 million decrease in vacancy loss and a 12.5% or $857,000 increase in reimbursement
income. Physical occupancy increased 0.8% to 95.8% and total income per occupied home decreased $55
to $1,277 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 3.7% or $285,000
increase in repairs and maintenance and a 3.2% or $397,000 increase in personnel costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
was 67.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 68.9% for the comparable period in
2009.
11
2009-vs.-2008
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2008
and held on December 31, 2009) consisted of 17,332 apartment homes and provided 72% of our total
NOI for the year ended December 31, 2009.
NOI for our same store community properties decreased 2.5% or $4.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in property NOI was primarily
attributable to a 2.4% or $6.2 million decrease in property rental income, which was partially
offset by a 2.3% or $1.8 million decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues was
primarily driven by a 3.1% or $7.7 million decrease in rental rates and a 52.1% or $573,000
increase in bad debt which was offset by an 13.7% or $1.6 million decrease in vacancy loss and a
7.3% or $739,000 increase in reimbursement income. Physical occupancy increased 0.3% to 95.3% and
total income per occupied home decreased $23 to $1,266.
The decrease in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 6.0% or $223,000
decrease in insurance, a 2.1% or $249,000 decrease in utilities, a 5.5% or $706,000 decrease in
repairs and maintenance, a 38.3% or $298,000 decrease in incentive bonuses, and a 6.6% or $365,000
decrease in administrative and marketing costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
was 69.3% during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
2008-vs.-2007
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2007
and held on December 31, 2008) consisted of 17,505 apartment homes and provided 72% of our property
NOI for the year ended December 31, 2008.
NOI for our same store community properties increased 4.8% or $8.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in property NOI was primarily
attributable to a 4.1% or $10.2 million increase in rental revenues and other income partially
offset by a 2.7% or $2.1 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues was
primarily driven by a 2.1% or $5.1 million increase in rental rates, a 16.2% or $1.5 million
increase in reimbursement income, a 6.9% or $866,000 decrease in vacancy loss, and a 77.6% or $2.5
million decrease in rental concessions. Physical occupancy increased 0.3% to 95.0% and total income
per occupied home increased $53 to $1,289.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 5.6% or $1.3 million
increase in real estate taxes due to higher assessed values on our communities and favorable tax
appeals in 2007, a 4.9% or $893,000 increase in personnel costs, and a 2.4% or $279,000 increase in
utilities partially offset by a 4.6% or $267,000 decrease in administrative and marketing costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
increased to 69.2% as compared to 68.7% in the comparable period in the prior year.
Non-Mature/Other Communities
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The remaining $4.0 million or 6.8% and $7.3 million or 6.2% of our total NOI during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, was generated from communities that we classify
as non-mature communities. The Operating Partnerships non-mature communities consist of
communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in same store communities, which includes
communities developed or acquired, redevelopment properties, sold properties, non-apartment
components of mixed use properties, properties classified as real estate held for disposition and
condominium properties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, a significant portion of
our NOI from non-mature communities was recognized from our redevelopment properties and amounted
to $2.7 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
2009-vs.-2008
The remaining $66.8 million and $67.8 million of our NOI during the year ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively, was generated from communities that we classify as non-mature
communities. Our non-mature communities consist of communities that do not meet the criteria to be
included in same store communities, which includes communities developed or acquired, redevelopment
properties, sold properties and properties classified as real estate held for disposition. For the
year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized NOI for our acquired communities of $49.3 million and
redevelopments of $11.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized NOI for our
acquired communities of $35.5 million, sold communities of $15.2 million, and redeveloped
properties of $11.8 million.
12
2008-vs.-2007
The remaining $68.1 million and $124.3 million of our NOI during the year ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, was generated from communities that we classify as non-mature
communities. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized NOI for our developments of $5.0
million, acquired communities of $35.6 million, redeveloped properties of $6.9 million, and sold
properties of $15.2 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized net operating
income for our developments of $4.6 million, acquired communities of $2.6 million, redeveloped
properties of $6.7 million, and sold properties of $92.1 million. In addition, in 2007 the Company
sold a portfolio of properties into a joint venture that the General Partner continued to manage
after the transaction and as such is not deemed discontinued operations. The NOI from those
communities was $15.6 million.
Other Income
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, other income primarily includes a recovery
from real estate tax accruals partially offset by losses due to the change in the fair value of
derivatives. Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes interest income
on a note receivable for $200 million that a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership received
related to the disposition of 55 properties during 2008. In May 2009, the $200 million note was
paid in full.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, other income primarily includes interest
income on a note for $200 million that a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership received related
to the disposition of 55 properties during 2008. In May 2009, the $200 million note was paid in
full.
Other Operating Expenses
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the increases in other operating expenses are
primarily due to additional costs incurred by the Operating Partnership related to long-term ground
leases associated with properties acquired in December 2007 and July 2008. A schedule of future
obligations related to ground leases is set forth under Contractual Obligations below.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, real estate depreciation and
amortization did not change significantly as the Operating Partnership did not have any
acquisitions or dispositions during these respective periods.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, real estate depreciation and amortization increased 7.9%
or $12.2 million as compared to the comparable period in 2008. The increase in depreciation and
amortization for the year ended December 31, 2009 is primarily the result of the acquisition of
nine communities with 3,348 apartment homes during 2008, and additional capital expenditures. As
part of the Operating Partnerships acquisition activity a portion of the purchase price is
allocated to intangible assets and are typically amortized over a period of less than one year.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, real estate depreciation and amortization on both
continuing and discontinued operations decreased 2.5% or $3.9 million as compared to the comparable
period in 2007. The decrease in depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2008
is a result of the repositioning efforts that included the sale of 55 operating communities. As the
properties sold in 2008 did not meet the criteria to be deemed as held-for-sale the communities
until late in the fourth quarter of 2007, we did not cease depreciation until that time. With the
proceeds from the sale, the Operating Partnership purchased $801.9 million of properties. As part
of our allocation of fair value associated with the purchase price, we attributed $5.7 million to
in-place leases for the 2008 acquisitions, which are generally amortized over an 11 month period.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, interest expense decreased 4.4% or $594,000 as
compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease is primarily due a decrease in the interest rate
charged on the note payable due to the General Partner partially offset by additional borrowings on
secured credit facilities. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 interest expense increased 3.7%
or $928,000 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily due to additional
borrowings on secured credit facilities partially offset by a decrease in the interest rate charged
on the note payable due to the General Partner.
13
For the year ended December 31, 2009, interest expense on both continuing and discontinued
operations increased 13.6% or $6.4 million as compared to 2008. This increase is primarily due to
additional borrowings on FNMA credit facilities offset by debt repayments and maturities.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, interest expense on both continuing and discontinued
operations slightly decreased 0.5% or $228,000 as compared to 2007. This decrease is primarily due
to repayments of fixed rate secured debt funded by the proceeds of 2007 and 2008 sales of real
estate, which was partially offset by additional borrowings, and an increase in the note payable
due to the General Partner.
General and Administrative
The Operating Partnership is charged directly for general and administrative expenses it
incurs. The Operating Partnership is also charged for other general and administrative expenses
that have been allocated by UDR to each of its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership,
based on each subsidiarys pro-rata portion of UDRs total apartment homes.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, general and administrative expenses
increased 41.9% or $1.6 million and 36.4% or $2.8 million, respectively, as compared to the
comparable period in 2009. The increases were due to a number of factors, none of which are
significant.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, general and administrative expenses decreased 11.5% or
$2.2 million as compared to 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a number of factors including
the write off of acquisition-related costs and severance and restructuring costs recognized in
2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative expenses decreased 17.2% or
$4.0 million as compared to 2007. The decrease is due to a number of factors including severance
costs and other restructuring charges relating to workforce reductions, relocation costs and other
related costs recognized in 2007.
Gain on the Sale of Depreciable Property
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized gains for financial
reporting purposes of $37,000 and $97,000 and $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Changes
in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our
divestiture activity from period to period as well as the extent of gains related to specific
properties sold.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized gains for financial
reporting purposes of $1.5 million, $475.2 million, and $143.4 million, respectively. Changes in
the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our divestiture
activity from period to period as well as the extent of gains related to specific properties sold.
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While
the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results through wage pressures, utilities and
material costs, substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less, which generally
enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by increasing rents on our apartment homes.
Although an extreme escalation in energy and food costs could have a negative impact on our
residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we do not believe this has had a material
impact on our results for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 or on our
results for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to
have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or
capital resources that are material.
14
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009
(dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
|
2013-2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
2,584
|
|
|
$
|
337,846
|
|
|
$
|
125,980
|
|
|
$
|
655,788
|
|
|
$
|
1,122,198
|
|
Interest on debt obligations
|
|
|
53,237
|
|
|
|
91,273
|
|
|
|
62,562
|
|
|
|
123,062
|
|
|
|
330,134
|
|
Operating lease
obligations- Ground leases
(a)
|
|
|
4,445
|
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
295,102
|
|
|
|
317,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,266
|
|
|
$
|
438,009
|
|
|
$
|
197,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,073,952
|
|
|
$
|
1,769,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
For purposes of our ground lease contracts, the Operating Partnership uses the minimum lease
payment, if stated in the agreement. For ground lease agreements where there is a reset
provision based on the communities appraised value or consumer price index but does not
included a specified minimum lease payment, the Operating Partnership uses the current rent
over the remainder of the lease term.
|
During 2009, we incurred gross interest costs of $49.0 million on secured debt, of which
$444,000 was capitalized.
Factors Affecting Our Business and Prospects
There are many factors that affect our business and the results of our operations, some of
which are beyond our control. These factors include:
|
|
|
general economic factors;
|
|
|
|
|
unfavorable changes in apartment market and economic conditions that could adversely
affect occupancy levels and rental rates;
|
|
|
|
|
the failure of acquisitions to achieve anticipated results;
|
|
|
|
|
possible difficulty in selling apartment communities;
|
|
|
|
|
competitive factors that may limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase or
maintain rents;
|
|
|
|
|
insufficient cash flow that could affect our debt financing and create refinancing risk;
|
|
|
|
|
failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could impair our debt service payments and
distributions to stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
redevelopment and construction risks that may impact our profitability;
|
|
|
|
|
potential damage from natural disasters, including hurricanes and other weather-related
events, which could result in substantial costs to us;
|
|
|
|
|
risks from extraordinary losses for which we may not have insurance or adequate reserves;
|
|
|
|
|
uninsured losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insurance retention, uninsured claims
or casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage;
|
|
|
|
|
changing interest rates, which could increase interest costs;
|
|
|
|
|
potential liability for environmental contamination, which could result in substantial
costs to us;
|
|
|
|
|
the imposition of federal taxes if the General Partner fails to qualify as a REIT under
the Code in any taxable year;
|
|
|
|
|
our internal control over financial reporting may not be considered effective which could
result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports, and in turn have an
adverse effect on our ability to issue OP units; and
|
|
|
|
|
changes in real estate laws, tax laws and other laws affecting our business.
|
15