UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 30, 2010
UDR, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
         
Maryland   1-10524   54-0857512
         
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
  (Commission File Number)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
     
1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200,
Highlands Ranch, Colorado
   
80129
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (720) 283-6120
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o   Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 
o   Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 
o   Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 
o   Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
 
 


 

Item 8.01 Other Events.
On September 30, 2010, United Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and a subsidiary of UDR, Inc. (the “Operating Partnership”), guaranteed certain outstanding securities of UDR, Inc. (the “Guarantees”). The Guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder of the applicable securities and to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of UDR, Inc. under the respective indenture whether for principal of or interest on the securities (and premium, if any), and all other monetary obligations of UDR, Inc. under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities and (b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations of UDR, Inc. under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities. The foregoing description of the Guarantees is qualified in its entirety by the full terms and conditions of the Guarantees, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this report and are incorporated herein by reference.
The consolidated financial statements, the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Schedule of Computation of the Ratio of Earnings to Consolidated Fixed Charges of the Operating Partnership are filed as exhibits to this report and are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits
         
Exhibit No.   Description
  12    
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
       
 
  99.1    
Guaranty of United Dominion Realty, L.P. with respect to the November 1, 1995 Indenture.
       
 
  99.2    
Guaranty of United Dominion Realty, L.P. with respect to the October 12, 2006 Indenture.
       
 
  99.3    
Consolidated Financial Statements of United Dominion Realty, L.P.
       
 
  99.4    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of United Dominion Realty, L.P.

 

1


 

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  UDR, Inc.
 
 
Date: September 30, 2010  By:   /s/ David L. Messenger    
    David L. Messenger   
    Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(duly authorized officer, principal financial and accounting officer)  
 

 

 

EXHIBIT 12
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in thousands)
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
(Loss)/income from continuing operations
  $ (4,259 )   $ 1,460     $ (8,743 )     5,272  
Add from continuing operations:
                               
Interest on indebtedness
    12,966       13,560       26,041       25,113  
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor
    395       389       786       778  
 
                       
Earnings
  $ 9,102     $ 15,409     $ 18,084     $ 31,163  
 
                       
 
                               
Fixed charges from continuing operations:
                               
Interest on indebtedness
  $ 12,966     $ 13,560     $ 26,041     $ 25,113  
Capitalized interest
    393       49       590       59  
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor
    395       389       786       778  
 
                       
Fixed charges
    13,754       13,998       27,417       25,950  
 
                       
 
                               
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
          1.10             1.20  
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was deficient of achieving a 1:1 ratio by $4.7 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was deficient of achieving a 1:1 ratio by $9.3 million.
                                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
 
(Loss)/income from continuing operations
  $ (5,520 )   $ 9,636     $ 116,370     $ 15,522     $ 7,689  
Add from continuing operations:
                                       
Interest on indebtedness
    53,547       46,671       35,455       37,727       39,593  
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor
    1,543       1,437       447       379       362  
 
                             
Earnings
  $ 49,570     $ 57,744     $ 152,272     $ 53,628     $ 47,644  
 
                             
 
                                       
Fixed charges from continuing operations:
                                       
Interest on indebtedness
  $ 53,547     $ 46,671     $ 35,455     $ 37,727     $ 39,593  
Capitalized interest
    444       573       909       1,096        
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor
    1,543       1,437       447       379       362  
 
                             
Fixed charges
    55,534       48,681       36,811       39,202       39,955  
 
                             
 
                                       
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
          1.19       4.14       1.37       1.19  
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was deficient of achieving a 1:1 ratio by $6.0 million.

 

 

Exhibit 99.1
GUARANTY
This Guaranty (this “Guaranty”) is executed and delivered as of September 30, 2010 (the “Effective Date”) by United Dominion Realty, L.P. a Delaware limited partnership, (the “Guarantor”), in favor of (a) U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Wachovia Bank, National Association, formerly known as First Union National Bank of Virginia), as trustee (the “Trustee”) pursuant to that certain Indenture dated as of November 1, 1995 between UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation (successor by merger to United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc., a Virginia corporation) (the “Company”) and the Trustee and (b) the holders of the Securities (as defined in the Indenture) issued from time to time under the Indenture whether issued prior to, on or subsequent to the Effective Date (the “Holders” and each a “Holder”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Indenture.
Guaranty. The Guarantor, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, hereby irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each Holder and to the Trustee and their successors and assigns (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at Maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the Company now or hereafter existing under the Indenture whether for principal of or interest on the Securities, (and premium and Make-Whole Amount if any) and all other monetary obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the Securities and (b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the Securities (all such obligations guaranteed hereby by the Guarantor being the “Guaranteed Obligations”).
The Guarantor agrees to pay any and all fees and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses) incurred by the Trustee or the Holders in enforcing any rights under this Guaranty with respect to the Guarantor.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Guaranty guarantees, to the extent provided herein, the payment of all amounts which constitute part of the Guaranteed Obligations and would be owed by the Company under the Indenture or the Securities but for the fact that they are unenforceable or not allowable due to the existence of a bankruptcy, reorganization or similar proceeding involving the Company.

 

 


 

Guaranty Absolute. This Guaranty is irrevocable, absolute and unconditional. The Guarantor guarantees that the Guaranteed Obligations will be performed strictly in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, regardless of any law, regulation or order now or hereafter in effect in any jurisdiction affecting any of such terms or the rights of the Trustee or the Holders with respect thereto. The obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty are independent of the Guaranteed Obligations, and a separate action or actions may be brought and prosecuted against the Guarantor to enforce this Guaranty by the Trustee on behalf of the Holders, irrespective of whether any action is brought against the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations or whether the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations is joined in any such action or actions. The liability of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall be absolute and unconditional irrespective of:
(a) any lack of validity or enforceability of the Indenture or the Securities with respect to the Company or any agreement or instrument relating thereto;
(b) any change in the time, manner or place of payment of, or in any other term of any of the Guaranteed Obligations, or any other amendment or waiver of or any consent to departure from the Indenture;
(c) the failure to give notice to the Guarantor of the occurrence of an Event of Default under the provisions of the Indenture or the Securities;
(d) any taking, release or amendment or waiver of or consent to departure from any other guaranty, for all or any of the Guaranteed Obligations;
(e) any failure, omission, delay by or inability on the part of the Trustee or the Holders to assert or exercise any right, power or remedy conferred on the Trustee or the Holders in the Indenture or the Securities;

 

Page 2 of 8


 

(f) any change in the corporate or other structure, or termination, dissolution, consolidation or merger of the Company or the Guarantor with or into any other entity, the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, sale or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company or the Guarantor, the marshaling of the assets and liabilities of the Company or the Guarantor, the receivership, insolvency, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors, reorganization, arrangement, composition with creditors, or readjustments of, or other similar proceedings affecting the Company or the Guarantor, or any of the assets of any of them;
(g) the assignment of any right, title or interest of the Trustee or any Holder in the Indenture or the Securities to any other Person; or
(h) any other event or circumstance (including any statute of limitations), whether foreseen or unforeseen and whether similar or dissimilar to any of the foregoing, that might otherwise constitute a defense available to, or a discharge of, the Company or the Guarantor, other than performance in full of the Guaranteed Obligations for the payment of money; it being the intent of the Guarantor that its obligations hereunder shall not be discharged except by payment of all amounts owing pursuant to the Indenture or the Securities.
This Guaranty shall continue to be effective or be reinstated, as the case may be, if at any time any payment or performance with respect to any of the Guaranteed Obligations is rescinded or must otherwise be returned by the Trustee, any Holder or any other Person upon the insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of the Company or otherwise, all as though such payment or performance had not been made or occurred. The obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall not be subject to reduction, termination or other impairment by any set-off, recoupment, counterclaim or defense or for any other reason.
Waivers. The Guarantor hereby irrevocably waives, to the extent permitted by applicable law:
(a) promptness, diligence, notice of acceptance and any other notice with respect to any of the Guaranteed Obligations and this Guaranty;

 

Page 3 of 8


 

(b) any requirement that the Trustee, any Holder or any other Person exhaust any right or take any action against the Company or any other Person, or obtain any relief pursuant to the Indenture or pursue any other available remedy;
(c) any defense arising by reason of any claim or defense based upon an election of remedies by the Trustee or any Holder which in any manner impairs, reduces, releases or otherwise adversely affects its subrogation, contribution or reimbursement rights or other rights to proceed against the Company or any other Person; and
(d) any duty on the part of the Trustee or any Holder to disclose to the Guarantor any matter, fact or thing relating to the business, operation or condition of the Company and its assets now known or hereafter known by the Trustee or such Holder.
Waiver of Subrogation and Contribution. Until the Indenture has been discharged, the Guarantor hereby irrevocably waives any claim or other right which it may now or hereafter acquire against the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations that arise from the existence, payment, performance or enforcement of the Guarantor’s obligations under this Guaranty, including any right of subrogation, reimbursement, exoneration, contribution, indemnification, any right to participate in any claim or remedy of the Trustee or any Holder against the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations which the Trustee or any Holder now has or hereafter acquires, whether or not such claim, remedy or right arises in equity, or under contract, statute or common law, including the right to take or receive from the Company, directly or indirectly, in cash or other property or by setoff or in any other manner, payment or security on account of such claim or other rights. If any amount shall be paid to the Guarantor in violation of the preceding sentence and the Guaranteed Obligations shall not have been paid in full, such amount shall be deemed to have been paid to the Guarantor for the benefit of, and held in trust for the benefit of, the Trustee, and the Holders, and shall forthwith be paid to the Trustee for the benefit of the Holders to be credited and applied to the Guaranteed Obligations, whether matured or unmatured, in accordance with the terms of the Indenture. The Guarantor acknowledges that it will receive direct and indirect benefits from the financing arrangements contemplated by the Indenture and that the waivers set forth in this section are knowingly made in contemplation of such benefits.

 

Page 4 of 8


 

The Guarantor agrees that it shall not be entitled to any right of subrogation in relation to the Holders in respect of any obligations guaranteed hereby until payment in full of all Guaranteed Obligations. The Guarantor further agrees that, as between itself, on the one hand, and the Holders and the Trustee, on the other hand, (a) the maturity of the Guaranteed Obligations may be accelerated for the purposes of this Guaranty, notwithstanding any stay, injunction or other prohibition preventing such acceleration in respect of the Guaranteed Obligations, and (b) in the event of any declaration of acceleration of such obligations, such obligations (whether or not due and payable) shall forthwith become due and payable by the Guarantor for the purpose of this Guaranty.
Certain Agreements. The Guarantor covenants and agrees that, as a condition to the acceptability of this Guaranty to the Trustee and the Holders, the Guarantor will:
(a) comply in all material respects with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders, such compliance to include paying when due all taxes, assessments and governmental charges imposed upon it or upon its property except to the extent contested in good faith;
(b) preserve and maintain its existence, rights (contractual and statutory) and franchises; provided, however, that the Guarantor shall not be required to preserve any right or franchise if the general partner of the Guarantor shall determine that the preservation thereof is no longer desirable in the conduct of the business of the Guarantor; and
(c) not consolidate with or merge with or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the surviving Person) another Person whether or not affiliated with such Guarantor unless:
(i) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than a Guarantor or the Company) unconditionally assumes all the obligations of the Guarantor under the Securities, the Indenture and this Guaranty on the terms set forth herein or therein; and
(ii) immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no Event of Default exists.

 

Page 5 of 8


 

In case of any such consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance and upon the assumption by the successor Person as set forth above of this Guaranty, such successor Person shall succeed to and be substituted for the Guarantor with the same effect as if it had been named herein as a Guarantor.
Except as previously set forth herein, and notwithstanding clauses (a) and (b) above, nothing contained in the Indenture or in any of the Securities shall prevent any consolidation or merger of the Guarantor with or into the Company or shall prevent any sale or conveyance of the property of the Guarantor as an entirety or substantially as an entirety to the Company.
No Waiver; Cumulative Remedies. No failure on the part of the Trustee or any Holder to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law. The Trustee and the Holders shall have all of the rights and remedies granted in the Indenture and available at law or in equity, and these same rights and remedies may be pursued separately, successively or concurrently against the Company or the Guarantor.
Continuing Guaranty. This Guaranty is a continuing guaranty and, except as otherwise provided herein, shall (a) remain in full force and effect until the satisfaction of the Guaranteed Obligations, (b) be binding upon the Guarantor and (c) enure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Trustee, the Holders and their successors, transferees and assigns.
Severability. Any provision of this Guaranty which is prohibited, unenforceable or not authorized in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition, unenforceability or non-authorization, without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof or affecting the validity, enforceability or legality of such provision in any other jurisdiction.

 

Page 6 of 8


 

Limitation on Guarantor Liability. The Guarantor, and by their acceptance of the benefits hereof, the Trustee and the Holders, hereby confirms that it is the intention of all such parties that the guaranty of the Guaranteed Obligations pursuant to this Guaranty not constitute a fraudulent transfer or conveyance for purposes of any Bankruptcy Law, any fraudulent conveyance statute, or any similar federal or state law. To effectuate the foregoing intention, the Trustee, the Holders and the Guarantor hereby irrevocably agree that the obligations of Guarantor under this Guaranty shall be limited to the maximum amount as will, after giving effect to all other contingent and fixed liabilities of Guarantor that are relevant under such laws and after giving effect to any collections from or payments made by or on behalf of Guarantor in respect of the obligations of such other Guarantor under this Guaranty, if any, result in the obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty not constituting a fraudulent transfer or conveyance.
Governing Law . This Guaranty shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia applicable to contracts executed, and to be fully performed, in such state.
Termination . This Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect until indefeasible payment in full of the Guaranteed Obligations.
Amendments . This Guaranty may not be amended except in writing signed by the Trustee and Guarantor.
Notices . All notices, requests and other communications hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile transmission or similar writing) and shall be given in the manner set forth in the Indenture (a) to Guarantor at its address set forth below its signature hereto, (b) to the Trustee at its address for notices provided for in the Indenture, or (c) as to each such party at such other address as such party shall designate in a written notice to the other party.
Headings . Section headings used in this Guaranty are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction of this Guaranty.

 

Page 7 of 8


 

In Witness Whereof, Guarantor has caused this Guaranty to be executed by its duly authorized representative and delivered as of the Effective Date.
             
    United Dominion Realty, L.P.
a Delaware limited partnership
   
 
           
 
  By:   UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation,
its General Partner
   
 
           
 
  By:   /s/ Warren L. Troupe     
 
     
 
Warren L. Troupe
Senior Executive Vice President
   

 

Page 8 of 8

Exhibit 99.2
GUARANTY
This Guaranty (this “Guaranty”) is executed and delivered as of September 30, 2010 (the “Effective Date”) by United Dominion Realty, L.P. a Delaware limited partnership, (the “Guarantor”), in favor of (a) U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) pursuant to that certain Indenture dated as of October 12, 2006 between UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation (successor by merger to United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation) (the “Company”) and the Trustee and (b) the holders of the Notes (as defined in the Indenture) issued from time to time under the Indenture whether issued prior to, on or subsequent to the Effective Date (the “Holders” and each a “Holder”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Indenture.
Guaranty. The Guarantor, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, hereby irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each Holder and to the Trustee and their successors and assigns (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at Stated Maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the Company now or hereafter existing under the Indenture whether for principal of or interest on the Notes, (and premium if any) and all other monetary obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the Notes and (b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the Notes (all such obligations guaranteed hereby by the Guarantor being the “Guaranteed Obligations”).
The Guarantor agrees to pay any and all fees and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses) incurred by the Trustee or the Holders in enforcing any rights under this Guaranty with respect to the Guarantor.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Guaranty guarantees, to the extent provided herein, the payment of all amounts which constitute part of the Guaranteed Obligations and would be owed by the Company under the Indenture or the Notes but for the fact that they are unenforceable or not allowable due to the existence of a bankruptcy, reorganization or similar proceeding involving the Company.

 

 


 

Guaranty Absolute. This Guaranty is irrevocable, absolute and unconditional. The Guarantor guarantees that the Guaranteed Obligations will be performed strictly in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, regardless of any law, regulation or order now or hereafter in effect in any jurisdiction affecting any of such terms or the rights of the Trustee or the Holders with respect thereto. The obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty are independent of the Guaranteed Obligations, and a separate action or actions may be brought and prosecuted against the Guarantor to enforce this Guaranty by the Trustee on behalf of the Holders, irrespective of whether any action is brought against the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations or whether the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations is joined in any such action or actions. The liability of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall be absolute and unconditional irrespective of:
(a) any lack of validity or enforceability of the Indenture or the Notes with respect to the Company or any agreement or instrument relating thereto;
(b) any change in the time, manner or place of payment of, or in any other term of any of the Guaranteed Obligations, or any other amendment or waiver of or any consent to departure from the Indenture;
(c) the failure to give notice to the Guarantor of the occurrence of an Event of Default under the provisions of the Indenture or the Notes;
(d) any taking, release or amendment or waiver of or consent to departure from any other guaranty, for all or any of the Guaranteed Obligations;
(e) any failure, omission, delay by or inability on the part of the Trustee or the Holders to assert or exercise any right, power or remedy conferred on the Trustee or the Holders in the Indenture or the Notes;

 

Page 2 of 8


 

(f) any change in the corporate or other structure, or termination, dissolution, consolidation or merger of the Company or the Guarantor with or into any other entity, the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, sale or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company or the Guarantor, the marshaling of the assets and liabilities of the Company or the Guarantor, the receivership, insolvency, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors, reorganization, arrangement, composition with creditors, or readjustments of, or other similar proceedings affecting the Company or the Guarantor, or any of the assets of any of them;
(g) the assignment of any right, title or interest of the Trustee or any Holder in the Indenture or the Notes to any other Person; or
(h) any other event or circumstance (including any statute of limitations), whether foreseen or unforeseen and whether similar or dissimilar to any of the foregoing, that might otherwise constitute a defense available to, or a discharge of, the Company or the Guarantor, other than performance in full of the Guaranteed Obligations for the payment of money; it being the intent of the Guarantor that its obligations hereunder shall not be discharged except by payment of all amounts owing pursuant to the Indenture or the Notes.
This Guaranty shall continue to be effective or be reinstated, as the case may be, if at any time any payment or performance with respect to any of the Guaranteed Obligations is rescinded or must otherwise be returned by the Trustee, any Holder or any other Person upon the insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of the Company or otherwise, all as though such payment or performance had not been made or occurred. The obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall not be subject to reduction, termination or other impairment by any set-off, recoupment, counterclaim or defense or for any other reason.
Waivers. The Guarantor hereby irrevocably waives, to the extent permitted by applicable law:
(a) promptness, diligence, notice of acceptance and any other notice with respect to any of the Guaranteed Obligations and this Guaranty;

 

Page 3 of 8


 

(b) any requirement that the Trustee, any Holder or any other Person exhaust any right or take any action against the Company or any other Person, or obtain any relief pursuant to the Indenture or pursue any other available remedy;
(c) any defense arising by reason of any claim or defense based upon an election of remedies by the Trustee or any Holder which in any manner impairs, reduces, releases or otherwise adversely affects its subrogation, contribution or reimbursement rights or other rights to proceed against the Company or any other Person; and
(d) any duty on the part of the Trustee or any Holder to disclose to the Guarantor any matter, fact or thing relating to the business, operation or condition of the Company and its assets now known or hereafter known by the Trustee or such Holder.
Waiver of Subrogation and Contribution. Until the Indenture has been discharged, the Guarantor hereby irrevocably waives any claim or other right which it may now or hereafter acquire against the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations that arise from the existence, payment, performance or enforcement of the Guarantor’s obligations under this Guaranty, including any right of subrogation, reimbursement, exoneration, contribution, indemnification, any right to participate in any claim or remedy of the Trustee or any Holder against the Company or any other guarantor of the Guaranteed Obligations which the Trustee or any Holder now has or hereafter acquires, whether or not such claim, remedy or right arises in equity, or under contract, statute or common law, including the right to take or receive from the Company, directly or indirectly, in cash or other property or by setoff or in any other manner, payment or security on account of such claim or other rights. If any amount shall be paid to the Guarantor in violation of the preceding sentence and the Guaranteed Obligations shall not have been paid in full, such amount shall be deemed to have been paid to the Guarantor for the benefit of, and held in trust for the benefit of, the Trustee, and the Holders, and shall forthwith be paid to the Trustee for the benefit of the Holders to be credited and applied to the Guaranteed Obligations, whether matured or unmatured, in accordance with the terms of the Indenture. The Guarantor acknowledges that it will receive direct and indirect benefits from the financing arrangements contemplated by the Indenture and that the waivers set forth in this section are knowingly made in contemplation of such benefits.

 

Page 4 of 8


 

The Guarantor agrees that it shall not be entitled to any right of subrogation in relation to the Holders in respect of any obligations guaranteed hereby until payment in full of all Guaranteed Obligations. The Guarantor further agrees that, as between itself, on the one hand, and the Holders and the Trustee, on the other hand, (a) the maturity of the Guaranteed Obligations may be accelerated for the purposes of this Guaranty, notwithstanding any stay, injunction or other prohibition preventing such acceleration in respect of the Guaranteed Obligations, and (b) in the event of any declaration of acceleration of such obligations, such obligations (whether or not due and payable) shall forthwith become due and payable by the Guarantor for the purpose of this Guaranty.
Certain Agreements. The Guarantor covenants and agrees that, as a condition to the acceptability of this Guaranty to the Trustee and the Holders, the Guarantor will:
(a) comply in all material respects with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders, such compliance to include paying when due all taxes, assessments and governmental charges imposed upon it or upon its property except to the extent contested in good faith;
(b) preserve and maintain its existence, rights (contractual and statutory) and franchises; provided, however, that the Guarantor shall not be required to preserve any right or franchise if the general partner of the Guarantor shall determine that the preservation thereof is no longer desirable in the conduct of the business of the Guarantor; and
(c) not consolidate with or merge with or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the surviving Person) another Person whether or not affiliated with such Guarantor unless:
(i) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than a Guarantor or the Company) unconditionally assumes all the obligations of the Guarantor under the Notes, the Indenture and this Guaranty on the terms set forth herein or therein; and
(ii) immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no Event of Default exists.

 

Page 5 of 8


 

In case of any such consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance and upon the assumption by the successor Person as set forth above of this Guaranty, such successor Person shall succeed to and be substituted for the Guarantor with the same effect as if it had been named herein as a Guarantor.
Except as previously set forth herein, and notwithstanding clauses (a) and (b) above, nothing contained in the Indenture or in any of the Notes shall prevent any consolidation or merger of the Guarantor with or into the Company or shall prevent any sale or conveyance of the property of the Guarantor as an entirety or substantially as an entirety to the Company.
No Waiver; Cumulative Remedies. No failure on the part of the Trustee or any Holder to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law. The Trustee and the Holders shall have all of the rights and remedies granted in the Indenture and available at law or in equity, and these same rights and remedies may be pursued separately, successively or concurrently against the Company or the Guarantor.
Continuing Guaranty. This Guaranty is a continuing guaranty and, except as otherwise provided herein, shall (a) remain in full force and effect until the satisfaction of the Guaranteed Obligations, (b) be binding upon the Guarantor and (c) enure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Trustee, the Holders and their successors, transferees and assigns.
Severability. Any provision of this Guaranty which is prohibited, unenforceable or not authorized in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition, unenforceability or non-authorization, without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof or affecting the validity, enforceability or legality of such provision in any other jurisdiction.

 

Page 6 of 8


 

Limitation on Guarantor Liability. The Guarantor, and by their acceptance of the benefits hereof, the Trustee and the Holders, hereby confirms that it is the intention of all such parties that the guaranty of the Guaranteed Obligations pursuant to this Guaranty not constitute a fraudulent transfer or conveyance for purposes of any Bankruptcy Law, any fraudulent conveyance statute, or any similar federal or state law. To effectuate the foregoing intention, the Trustee, the Holders and the Guarantor hereby irrevocably agree that the obligations of Guarantor under this Guaranty shall be limited to the maximum amount as will, after giving effect to all other contingent and fixed liabilities of Guarantor that are relevant under such laws and after giving effect to any collections from or payments made by or on behalf of Guarantor in respect of the obligations of such other Guarantor under this Guaranty, if any, result in the obligations of the Guarantor under this Guaranty not constituting a fraudulent transfer or conveyance.
Governing Law . This Guaranty shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts executed, and to be fully performed, in such state.
Termination . This Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect until indefeasible payment in full of the Guaranteed Obligations.
Amendments . This Guaranty may not be amended except in writing signed by the Trustee and Guarantor.
Notices . All notices, requests and other communications hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile transmission or similar writing) and shall be given in the manner set forth in the Indenture (a) to Guarantor at its address set forth below its signature hereto, (b) to the Trustee at its address for notices provided for in the Indenture, or (c) as to each such party at such other address as such party shall designate in a written notice to the other party.
Headings . Section headings used in this Guaranty are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction of this Guaranty.

 

Page 7 of 8


 

In Witness Whereof, Guarantor has caused this Guaranty to be executed by its duly authorized representative and delivered as of the Effective Date.
             
    United Dominion Realty, L.P.
a Delaware limited partnership
   
 
           
 
  By:   UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation,
its General Partner
   
 
           
 
  By:   /s/ Warren L. Troupe     
 
     
 
Warren L. Troupe
Senior Executive Vice President
   

 

Page 8 of 8

EXHIBIT 99.3
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
         
    Page  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    1  
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008
    2  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009
    3  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009
    4  
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital and Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009
    5  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    6  
SCHEDULE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
         
    Page  
Schedule III — Summary of Real Estate Owned
    28  
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
         
    Page  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited)
    31  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
    32  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
    33  
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital and Comprehensive Income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
    34  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
    35  
All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

 

 


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Partners
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule — Schedule III Real Estate Owned. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Denver, Colorado
September 30, 2010

 

1


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
               
ASSETS
               
 
               
Real estate owned:
               
Real estate held for investment
  $ 3,640,888     $ 3,569,239  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (717,892 )     (552,369 )
 
           
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation
    2,922,996       3,016,870  
Cash and cash equivalents
    442       3,590  
Restricted cash
    6,865       5,371  
Deferred financing costs, net
    8,727       6,849  
Notes receivable due from third party
          200,000  
Other assets
    22,037       22,171  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 2,961,067     $ 3,254,851  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
               
 
               
Secured debt
  $ 1,122,198     $ 851,901  
Note payable due to General Partner
    71,547       86,249  
Real estate taxes payable
    8,561       8,259  
Accrued interest payable
    933       238  
Security deposits and prepaid rent
    13,728       13,540  
Distributions payable
    32,642       214,307  
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property
    63,838       63,838  
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
    25,872       33,769  
 
           
Total liabilities
    1,339,319       1,272,101  
 
               
Capital:
               
Partners’ capital:
               
Operating partnership units: 179,909,408 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2009 (166,163,187 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2008):
               
General partner: 110,883 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2009 (102,410 at December 31, 2008)
    1,456       1,452  
Limited partners: 179,798,525 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2009 (166,060,777 OP units outstanding at December 31, 2008)
    2,199,450       2,349,247  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (3,153 )     (4,874 )
 
           
Total partners’ capital
    2,197,753       2,345,825  
Receivable due from General Partner
    (588,185 )     (375,124 )
Non-controlling interest
    12,180       12,049  
 
           
Total capital
    1,621,748       1,982,750  
 
           
Total liabilities and capital
  $ 2,961,067     $ 3,254,851  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

2


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data)
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
REVENUES
                       
Rental income
  $ 353,056     $ 336,674     $ 297,094  
Non-property income:
                       
Other income
    5,695       13,106       150  
 
                 
Total revenues
    358,751       349,780       297,244  
 
                       
EXPENSES
                       
Rental expenses:
                       
Real estate taxes and insurance
    43,031       38,939       34,630  
Personnel
    27,344       26,591       23,689  
Utilities
    17,236       15,667       14,427  
Repair and maintenance
    17,355       17,231       15,311  
Administrative and marketing
    7,522       7,394       7,115  
Property management
    9,709       9,259       8,170  
Other operating expenses
    4,868       4,400       1,342  
Real estate depreciation and amortization
    166,773       154,584       115,806  
Interest expense:
                       
Interest on secured debt
    48,519       41,643       31,335  
Interest on note payable due to General Partner
    5,028       5,028       4,120  
General and administrative
    16,886       19,081       23,033  
Other depreciation and amortization
          327       329  
 
                 
Total expenses
    364,271       340,144       279,307  
 
                 
(Loss)/income from operations
    (5,520 )     9,636       17,937  
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property to a joint venture
                98,433  
 
                 
(Loss)/income from continuing operations
    (5,520 )     9,636       116,370  
Income from discontinued operations
    1,475       489,272       78,060  
 
                 
Consolidated net (loss)/income
    (4,045 )     498,908       194,430  
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
    (131 )     (1,188 )     (742 )
 
                 
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (4,176 )   $ 497,720     $ 193,688  
 
                 
 
                       
Earnings per OP unit- basic and diluted:
                       
(Loss)/income from continuing operations attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (0.03 )   $ 0.06     $ 0.70  
Income from discontinued operations
  $ 0.01     $ 2.94     $ 0.47  
(Loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (0.02 )   $ 3.00     $ 1.17  
 
                       
Weighted average OP units outstanding
    178,817       166,163       166,174  
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

3


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
(unaudited)
                         
    Year ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
Operating Activities
                       
Consolidated net (loss)/income
  $ (4,045 )   $ 498,908     $ 194,430  
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    166,773       154,911       158,863  
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property
    (1,475 )     (475,249 )     (143,408 )
Write off of bad debt
    2,216       1,439       1,927  
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other
    2,195       1,766       1,408  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets
    (3,340 )     (3,463 )     1,033  
Decrease in operating liabilities
    (4,991 )     (9,652 )     (1,526 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    157,333       168,660       212,727  
 
                       
Investing Activities
                       
Proceeds from sales of real estate investments, net
          879,930       404,240  
Proceeds from note receivable
    200,000              
Acquisition of real estate assets (net of liabilities assumed) and initial capital expenditures
          (713,649 )     (236,944 )
Capital expenditures and other major improvements — real estate assets, net of escrow reimbursement
    (70,372 )     (84,288 )     (92,227 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by investing activities
    129,628       81,993       75,069  
 
                       
Financing Activities
                       
Net repayments and distributions to UDR, Inc.
    (550,392 )     (319,478 )     (150,162 )
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt
    340,608       292,120        
Payments on secured debt
    (64,455 )     (204,205 )     (125,886 )
Payment of financing costs
    (4,073 )     (3,639 )     (121 )
Contributions from limited partner
                320  
Repurchase of Out-Performance Partnership Units
          (524 )     (335 )
Distributions paid to non-affiliated partnership unitholders
    (11,797 )     (11,424 )     (11,663 )
 
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (290,109 )     (247,150 )     (287,847 )
 
                       
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (3,148 )     3,503       (51 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
    3,590       87       138  
 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
  $ 442     $ 3,590     $ 87  
 
                 
 
                       
Supplemental Information:
                       
Interest paid during the year, net of amounts capitalized
  $ 46,029     $ 41,929     $ 42,918  
Non-cash transactions:
                       
Issuance of note receivable upon the disposition of real estate
  $     $ 200,000     $  
Secured debt assumed at acquisition
          95,705       36,193  
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

4


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
                                                                                 
                    UDR, Inc.     Out-Performance     Accumulated Other     Total     Receivable due              
    Class A Limited     Limited     Limited     General     Partnership     Comprehensive     Partnership     from General     Non-Controlling        
    Partner     Partners     Partner     Partner     Shares     Income/(Loss)     Equity     Partner     Interest     Total  
 
                                                                               
Balance, January 1, 2007
  $ 51,430     $ 204,216     $ 1,947,905     $ 1,391     $ 52,464     $     $ 2,257,406     $ (257,963 )   $ 10,119     $ 2,009,562  
 
                                                                               
Distributions
    (2,150 )     (7,265 )     (197,733 )     (135 )     (2,063 )           (209,346 )                 (209,346 )
 
                                                                               
Issuances- Series E OPPS
                            320             320                   320  
 
                                                                               
OPPS Unit Conversion- Series A
          50,313                   (50,313 )                                  
 
                                                                               
Repurchases
                            (335 )           (335 )                 (335 )
 
                                                                               
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
          (27,451 )     27,451                                            
 
                                                                               
Distribution of community to UDR
                (9,329 )                       (9,329 )                 (9,329 )
 
                                                                               
Adjustment to reflect limited partners’ capital at redemption value
    (19,155 )     (86,875 )     106,030                                            
 
                                                                               
Net and comprehensive income
    1,989       6,722       182,943       125       1,909             193,688             742       194,430  
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
                                              3,707               3,707  
 
                                                           
Balance, December 31, 2007
    32,114       139,660       2,057,267       1,381       1,982             2,232,404       (254,256 )     10,861       1,989,009  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Distributions
    (3,719 )     (13,067 )     (361,879 )     (236 )                 (378,901 )                 (378,901 )
 
                                                                               
Repurchases
                            (524 )           (524 )                 (524 )
 
                                                                               
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
          (29,136 )     29,136                                            
Adjustment to reflect limited partners’ capital at redemption value
    (10,949 )     (35,863 )     46,812                                            
 
                                                                               
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
                                                                               
 
                                                                               
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments
                                  (4,874 )     (4,874 )                 (4,874 )
 
                                                                               
Net income
    4,864       17,091       475,458       307                   497,720             1,188       498,908  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total comprehensive income/(loss)
    4,864       17,091       475,458       307             (4,874 )     492,846             1,188       494,034  
 
                                                                               
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
                                                          (120,868 )             (120,868 )
 
                                                           
Balance, December 31, 2008
    22,310       78,685       2,246,794       1,452       1,458       (4,874 )     2,345,825       (375,124 )     12,049       1,982,750  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Distributions
    (2,328 )     (3,600 )     (146,954 )     (94 )                 (152,976 )                 (152,976 )
 
                                                                               
Issuance of OP Units through Special Dividend
    1,568       5,691             100                     7,359       153,611               160,970  
 
                                                                               
Forfeitures- OPPS units
    14       34       1,409       1       (1,458 )                              
 
                                                                               
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
          (23,308 )     23,308                                            
 
                                                                               
Adjustment to reflect limited partners’ capital at redemption value
    7,274       12,218       (19,492 )                                          
 
                                                                               
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
                                                                               
 
                                                                               
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
                                  1,721       1,721                   1,721  
 
                                                                               
Net loss
    (41 )     (98 )     (4,034 )     (3 )                 (4,176 )           131       (4,045 )
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total comprehensive income
    (41 )     (98 )     (4,034 )     (3 )           1,721       (2,455 )           131       (2,324 )
 
                                                                               
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
                                                          (366,672 )             (366,672 )
 
                                                           
Balance, December 31, 2009
  $ 28,797     $ 69,622     $ 2,101,031     $ 1,456     $     $ (3,153 )   $ 2,197,753     $ (588,185 )   $ 12,180     $ 1,621,748  
 
                                                           
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

5


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization and formation
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (“UDR, L.P.”, the “Operating Partnership”, “we” or “our”) is a Delaware limited partnership, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, redevelops, manages, and disposes of multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets located in the United States. The high barrier-to-entry markets are characterized by limited land for new construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement process, expensive single-family home prices and significant employment growth potential. UDR, L.P. is a subsidiary of UDR, Inc. (“UDR” or the “General Partner”) , a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and through which UDR conducts a significant portion of its business. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, revenues of the Operating Partnership represented of 58%, 59%, and 59% of the General Partner’s consolidated revenues. At December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership’s apartment portfolio consisted of 81 communities located in 19 markets consisting of 23,351 apartment homes.
Interests in UDR, L.P. are represented by Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”). The Operating Partnership’s net income is allocated to the partners, which is initially based on their respective distributions made during the year and secondly, their percentage interests. Distributions are made in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”), on a per unit basis that is generally equal to the dividend per share on UDR’s common stock, which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “UDR”.
There were 179,909,408 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding as of December 31, 2009 of which, 173,922,816 or 96.7% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 5,986,592 or 3.3%, which were owned by non-affiliated limited partners. As of December 31, 2008, there were 166,163,187 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which, 158,839,408 or 95.6% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 7,323,779 or 4.4%, which were owned by non-affiliated limited partners. See Note 9, Capital Structure .
As sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, UDR owned 110,883 and 102,410 general partnership interest or .06% in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 179,798,525 and 166,060,777, respectively, OP units outstanding of limited partnership interest, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815, respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership OP units. UDR owned 173,811,933 or 96.7% and 158,736,998 or 95.5% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining 5,986,592 or 3.3% and 7,323,779 or 4.4% OP units outstanding of limited partnership interest were held by non- affiliated partners at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815, respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership units.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements consists of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Profits and losses are allocated in accordance with the terms of the Operating Partnership agreement. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). Effective for our financial statements issued for interim and annual periods commencing with the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification” or “ASC”) is the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all then-existing, non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. In the FASB’s view, the Codification does not change GAAP, and therefore the adoption of SFAS 168, now referred to as FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles , did not have an effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, where we have referred to specific authoritative accounting literature, both the Codification and pre-Codification GAAP literature are disclosed.

 

6


 

FASB ASC 810, Consolidation (formerly SFAS 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements- an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin 51 (“Consolidated Financial Statements”)” establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling (minority) interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated net income should include the net income for both the parent and the non-controlling interest with disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of operations. The Operating Partnership adopted this standard, effective January 1, 2009. There was no impact to net loss attributable to unit holders.
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Instruments” and FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”) (“Topic 820”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. Topic 820 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. The adoption of Topic 820 for financial assets and liabilities, as of January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on our financial position or operations. Topic 820 delayed the effective date of Topic 820’s fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurements identified in Topic 820 was effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (formerly SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations”) became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This standard establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. This standard also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination, recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, and determining what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The adoption of this guidance could materially impact our future consolidated financial position and results of operations depending on UDR, L.P.’s acquisition activity as certain acquisition costs that have historically been capitalized as part of the basis of the real estate and amortized over the real estate’s useful life will now be expensed as incurred. This guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2009.
FASB ASC 815, Derivatives (formerly SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”) (“Topic 815”), effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009, presents disclosure requirements to enhance the financial statement user’s understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Topic 815 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The standard did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, it requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments. See Note 8, Derivative and Hedging Activity, for these additional disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”), which (1) addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept from ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing (formerly SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”), and (2) responds to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”), including concerns over the transparency of enterprises’ involvement with variable interest entities. SFAS 167 is effective beginning on January 1, 2010. The Operating Partnership does not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as a result of the new guidance.

 

7


 

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (“ASU 2009-05”), which provides amendments to Topic 820. ASU 2009-05 provides additional guidance clarifying the measurement of liabilities at fair value. ASU 2009-05 was effective in the fourth quarter 2009 for a calendar year entity. This guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Operating Partnership adopted certain accounting guidance within ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes , with respect to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements. The guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Operating Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management of the Operating Partnership is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. The Operating Partnership has no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.
Management of the Operating Partnership has reviewed all open tax years and major jurisdictions and concluded the adoption of the new accounting guidance resulted in no impact to the Operating Partnership’s financial position or results of operations. There is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in future tax returns.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts realized or paid could differ from those estimates. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
Discontinued operations
For properties accounted for under FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (formerly SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”) (“Topic 360”), the results of operations for those properties sold during the year or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the current year are classified as discontinued operations in the current and prior periods. Further, to meet the discontinued operations criteria, the Operating Partnership or related parties will not have any significant continuing involvement in the ownership or operation of the property after the sale or disposition. Once a property is deemed as held-for-sale, depreciation is no longer recorded. However, if the Operating Partnership determines that the property no longer meets the criteria for held-for-sale, the Company will recapture any unrecorded depreciation on the property (see Note 4, Discontinued Operations for further discussion).
Real estate
Real estate assets held for investment are carried at historical cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment and other costs incurred during their development, acquisition and redevelopment.
Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to the acquisition and/or improvement of real estate assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives if the expenditures qualify as a betterment or the life of the related asset will be substantially extended beyond the original life expectancy.
The Operating Partnership purchases real estate investment properties and allocates the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair value. The primary, although not only, identifiable intangible asset associated with our portfolio is the value of existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired community, we first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the community is vacant. The Operating Partnership estimates the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a hypothetical lease-up. Depreciation on the building is based on the expected useful life of the asset and the in-place leases are amortized over their remaining contractual life.

 

8


 

Quarterly or when changes in circumstances warrant, UDR, L.P. will assess our real estate portfolio for indicators of impairment. In determining whether the Operating Partnership has indicators of impairment in our real estate assets, we assess whether the long-lived asset’s carrying value exceeds the community’s undiscounted future cash flows, which is representative of projected NOI plus the residual value of the community. Our future cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding periods. If such indicators of impairment are present and the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of the community, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value. Our estimates of fair market value represent our best estimate based upon industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.
For long-lived assets to be disposed of, impairment losses are recognized when the fair value of the asset less estimated cost to sell is less than the carrying value of the asset. Properties classified as real estate held for disposition generally represent properties that are actively marketed or contracted for sale with the closing expected to occur within the next twelve months. Real estate held for disposition is carried at the lower of cost, net of accumulated depreciation, or fair value, less the cost to dispose, determined on an asset-by-asset basis. Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs on held for disposition properties are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to held for disposition properties are capitalized at cost. Depreciation is not recorded on real estate held for disposition.
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets which are 35 years for buildings, 10 to 35 years for major improvements, and 3 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other assets. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the value of our net intangible assets which are reflected in “Other assets” was $4.8 million and $6.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the value of our net intangible liabilities which are reflected in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities” was $3.6 million and $3.8 million in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balances are being amortized over the remaining life of the respective intangible.
All development and redevelopment projects and related carrying costs are capitalized during periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress. As each building in a project is completed and becomes available for lease-up, the Operating Partnership ceases capitalization and the assets are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The costs of projects which include interest, real estate taxes, insurance, and allocated development overhead related to support costs for personnel working directly on the development site are capitalized during the construction period. During 2009, 2008, and 2007, total interest capitalized pertaining to redevelopment projects and land held for future development was $444,000, $580,000, and $1.0 million, respectively.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and demand deposits with financial institutions. Restricted cash consists of escrow deposits held by lenders for real estate taxes, insurance and replacement reserves, and security deposits.
Derivative financial instruments
The General Partner utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and will generally designate these financial instruments as a cash flow hedge. Derivative financial instruments associated with the Operating Partnership’s allocation of the General Partner’s debt are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability and measured quarterly at their fair value. The changes in fair value for the General Partner’s cash flow hedges allocated to the Operating Partnership that are deemed effective are reflected in other comprehensive income and for non-designated derivative financial instruments in earnings. For cash flow hedges the ineffective component, if any, is recorded in earnings.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income, which is defined as all changes in capital during each period except for those resulting from investments by or distributions to partners, is displayed in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital and Comprehensive Income. For the year ended December 31, 2009, other comprehensive income consisted of the change in the fair value of the General Partner’s effective cash flow hedges that are allocated to the Operating Partnership.

 

9


 

Income Taxes
The taxable income or loss of the Operating Partnership is reported in the tax returns of the partners. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes. The Partnership’s tax returns are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Net income for financial reporting purposes differs from the net income for income tax reporting purposes primarily due to temporary differences, principally real estate depreciation and the tax deferral of certain gains on property sales. The differences in depreciation result from differences in the book and tax basis of certain real estate assets and the differences in the methods of depreciation and lives of the real estate assets.
Revenue and real estate sales gain recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in accordance with FASB ASC 840, Leases (formerly SFAS 13 “Accounting for Leases”) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. Rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis and recognized when earned. The Operating Partnership recognizes interest income, management and other fees and incentives when earned, fixed and determinable.
The Operating Partnership accounts for sales of real estate in accordance with FASB ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales (formerly SFAS 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate”). For sale transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as the Operating Partnership no longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the related assets and liabilities from our Consolidated Balance Sheets and record the gain or loss in the period the transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for the transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales to entities in which we or our General Partner retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize profit proportionate to the outside interest in the buyer and will defer the gain on the interest we or our General Partner retain. The Operating Partnership will recognize any deferred gain when the property is then sold to a third party. In transactions accounted by us as partial sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority equity interest in the venture was provided a preference as to cash flows in either an operating or a capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the entire property.
Earnings per Operating Partnership Unit
Basic earnings per OP Unit is computed by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to general and limited partner unitholders by the weighted average number of general and limited partner units (including redeemable OP Units) outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per OP Unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue OP Units were exercised or converted into OP Units or resulted in the issuance of OP Units and then shared in the earnings of the Operating Partnership. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, there were no dilutive instruments, and therefore, diluted earnings per OP Unit and basic earnings per OP Unit are the same.
Non-controlling interests
The noncontrolling interests represent the General Partner’s interests in certain consolidated subsidiaries and are presented in the capital section of the consolidated balance sheets since these interests are not convertible or redeemable into any other ownership interests of the Operating Partnership.
Advertising costs
All advertising costs are expensed as incurred and reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations within the line item “Administrative and marketing”. During 2009, 2008, and 2007, total advertising expense from continuing and discontinued operations was $2.4 million, $2.6 million, and $4.5 million, respectively.

 

10


 

Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The Operating Partnership is charged directly with general and administrative expenses it incurs. The Operating Partnership is also charged with other general and administrative expenses that have been allocated by the General Partner to each of its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership, based on each subsidiary’s pro-rata portion of UDR’s total apartment homes. (See Note 6, Related Party Transactions .)
Market concentration risk
Approximately 20.9%, 15.7% and 14.2% of our apartment communities are located in Orange County, California, Metropolitan Washington DC, and San Francisco, California, respectively, based on the carrying value of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Therefore, the Partnership is subject to increased exposure (positive or negative) from economic and other competitive factors specific to those markets.
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Operating Partnership consists of income producing operating properties and land held for future development. As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership owned and consolidated 81 communities in 8 states plus the District of Columbia totaling 23,351 apartment homes. The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands):
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
               
Land
  $ 985,126     $ 980,648  
Depreciable property — held and used
               
Buildings and improvements
    2,525,812       2,470,213  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    108,094       95,872  
Land held for future development
    21,856       22,506  
 
           
Investment in real estate
    3,640,888       3,569,239  
Accumulated depreciation
    (717,892 )     (552,369 )
 
           
 
               
Investment in real estate, net
  $ 2,922,996     $ 3,016,870  
 
           

 

11


 

The Operating Partnership did not have any acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2009. The following table summarizes the Operating Partnership’s real estate community acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands) :
                         
                    Purchase  
Property Name   Market   Acquisition Date   Units     Price (a)  
 
                       
Dulaney Crescent
  Baltimore, MD   March 2008     264     $ 57,690  
Delancey at Shirlington Village
  Metro D.C.   March 2008     241       85,000  
Edgewater
  San Francisco, CA   March 2008     193       115,000  
Circle Towers
  Metro D.C.   March 2008     606       138,378 (b)
Legacy Village
  Dallas, TX   March 2008     1,043       118,500  
Pine Brook Village II
  Orange County, CA   May 2008     296       87,320  
Hearthstone at Merrill Creek
  Seattle, WA   May 2008     220       38,000  
Island Square
  Seattle, WA   July 2008     235       112,202  
Almaden Lake Village
  San Francisco, CA   July 2008     250       47,270  
 
                   
 
                       
 
            3,348     $ 799,360  
 
                   
     
(a)   The purchase price is the contractual amount paid by UDR LP to the third party and does not include any costs that the Operating Partnership incurred in the pursuit of the property.
 
(b)   The purchase price does not include the $5.9 million of commercial space acquired in the transaction.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The results of operations for properties sold during the year or designated as held-for-sale at the end of the year are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Properties classified as real estate held for disposition generally represent properties that are actively marketed or contracted for sale with the closing expected to occur within the next twelve months. The application of ASC Topic 360 does not have an impact on net income attributable to unit holders. The application of ASC Topic 360 results in the reclassification of the operating results of all properties sold or classified as held for disposition through December 31, 2009, within the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, and the reclassification of the assets and liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, if applicable.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership did not dispose of any communities. At December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership did not have any assets that met the criteria to be included in discontinued operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Operating Partnership sold 55 communities and recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $475.2 million on these sales. At December 31, 2008, UDR L.P. did not have any assets that met the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. In conjunction with the sale of these communities, the Operating Partnership received a $200.0 million note (outstanding at December 31, 2008). The note which is secured by a pledge, security agreement and a guarantee from the buyer’s parent entity bears a fixed rate of interest of 7.5% per annum and matures on March 31, 2014, provided however that the master credit facility agreement pursuant to which the buyer financed the acquisition of the properties provides that the buyer will pay or prepay the note on or before the date that is fourteen (14) months after the Initial Closing Date (May 3, 2009) and further that it is an event of default under the master credit facility agreement if the note is not paid in full by June 1, 2009. The Operating Partnership received full payment of the note during the year ended December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Operating Partnership sold 12 communities and recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $143.4 million on these sales, of which $45.0 million is included in discontinued operations. The remaining $98.4 million of gains recognized, related to the sale of seven additional communities to a joint venture in which the General Partner holds a 20% interest, and is reported as a component of continuing operations. The results of operations for the properties classified as discontinued operations and the interest expense associated with the secured debt on these properties are classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item entitled “Income from discontinued operations.”

 

12


 

The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) :
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
Rental income
  $     $ 25,338     $ 148,104  
 
                       
Rental expenses
          10,150       55,975  
Property management fee
          697       4,073  
Real estate depreciation
                42,727  
Interest
          468       11,912  
Other expenses
                333  
 
                 
 
          11,315       115,020  
Income before net gain on the sale of property
          14,023       33,084  
Net gain on the sale of property
    1,475       475,249       44,976  
 
                 
Income from discontinued operations
  $ 1,475     $ 489,272     $ 78,060  
 
                 
5. DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of classification in the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Operating Partnership having effectively established the interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured debt consists of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 ( dollars in thousands ):
                                         
                    2009  
    Principal Outstanding     Weighted     Weighted     Number of  
    December 31,     Average     Average     Communities  
    2009     2008     Interest Rate     Years to Maturity     Encumbered  
Fixed Rate Debt
                                       
Mortgage notes payable
  $ 230,852     $ 289,366       5.58 %     3.8       6  
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
    13,325       13,325       5.30 %     21.2       1  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    587,403       396,154       5.30 %     7.1       12  
 
                             
Total fixed rate secured debt
    831,580       698,845       5.38 %     6.4       19  
 
                                       
Variable Rate Debt
                                       
Mortgage notes payable
    100,590       37,415       2.73 %     5.2       4  
Tax-exempt secured note payable
    27,000       27,000       1.36 %     20.2       1  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    163,028       88,641       1.99 %     6.0       14  
 
                             
Total variable rate secured debt
    290,618       153,056       2.19 %     7.0       19  
 
                             
Total secured debt
  $ 1,122,198     $ 851,901       4.55 %     6.6       38  
 
                             
As of December 31, 2009, the General Partner has secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General Partner’s option. There is $950.0 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance of $249.1 million on these facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of 1.7%. There is $750.4 million and $484.8 million of these credit facilities that are allocated to the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.

 

13


 

                 
    December 31, 2009     December 31, 2008  
    (dollar amounts in thousands)  
 
               
Borrowings outstanding
  $ 750,431     $ 484,795  
Weighted average borrowings during the period ended
    646,895       409,823  
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended
    750,572       484,920  
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended
    4.6 %     5.5 %
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period
    4.6 %     5.0 %
The General Partner will from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt instruments. In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair value and amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life of the underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair value adjustment of the fixed rate debt instruments on the Operating Partnership’s properties was a net discount of $1.2 million and $1.1 million at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from February 2011 through June 2016 and carry interest rates ranging from 5.03% to 5.94%.
Tax-exempt secured notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt housing bond issues mature in March 2031 and carry an interest rate of 5.30%. Interest on these notes is payable in semi-annual installments.
Secured credit facilities. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the General Partner had borrowings against its fixed rate facilities of $950.0 million and $666.6 million, respectively, of which $587.4 million and $396.2 million, respectively, were allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of December 31, 2009, the fixed rate Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted average fixed rate of interest of 5.30%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from July 2013 through April 2016. The mortgage notes payable interest is based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which translate into interest rates ranging from 1.12% to 3.87% at December 31, 2009.
Tax-exempt secured note payable. The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly installments. The mortgage note payable has an interest rate of 1.36% as of December 31, 2009.
Secured credit facilities. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the General Partner had borrowings against its variable rate facilities of $249.1 million and $164.5 million, respectively, of which $163.0 million and $88.6 million, respectively, were allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of December 31, 2009, the variable rate borrowings under the Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted average floating rate of interest of 1.99%.

 

14


 

The aggregate maturities of the Operating Partnership’s secured debt due during each of the next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
                                                         
    Fixed     Variable        
    Mortgage     Tax-Exempt     Credit     Mortgage     Tax Exempt     Credit        
    Notes     Notes Payable     Facilities     Notes     Notes Payable     Facilities     Total  
 
                                                       
2010
  $ 2,584     $     $     $     $     $     $ 2,584  
2011
    47,073             36,243       427             28,641       112,384  
2012
    49,771             126,849       639             48,203       225,462  
2013
    61,562             25,723       38,055                   125,340  
2014
                      640                   640  
Thereafter
    69,862       13,325       398,588       60,829       27,000       86,184       655,788  
 
                                         
Total
  $ 230,852     $ 13,325     $ 587,403     $ 100,590     $ 27,000     $ 163,028     $ 1,122,198  
 
                                         
Guarantor to Unsecured Debt
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partner’s unsecured credit facility, with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At December 31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $189.3 million.
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Receivable due from the General Partner
The Operating Partnership participates in the General Partner’s central cash management program, wherein all the Operating Partnership’s cash receipts are remitted to the General Partner and all cash disbursements are funded by the General Partner. In addition, other miscellaneous costs such as administrative expenses are incurred by the General Partner on behalf of the Operating Partnership. As a result of these various transactions between the Operating Partnership and the General Partner, the Operating Partnership had a net receivable balance of $588.2 million and $375.1 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The General Partner performs various general and administrative and other overhead services for the Operating Partnership including legal assistance, acquisitions analysis, marketing and advertising, and allocates these expenses to the Operating Partnership first on the basis of direct usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated based on its pro-rata portion of UDR’s total apartment homes. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the general and administrative expenses allocated to the Operating Partnership by UDR were $25.9 million, $28.9 million, and $34.9 million, respectively, and are included in “General and Administrative” expenses of the consolidated statements of operations. In the opinion of management, this method of allocation reflects the level of services received from the General Partner.
Guaranty by the General Partner
The General Partner provided a “bottom dollar” guaranty to certain limited partners as part of their original contribution to the Operating Partnership. The guaranty protects the tax basis of the underlying contribution and is reflected on the OP unitholder’s Schedule K-1 tax form. The guaranty was made in the form of a loan from the General Partner to the Operating Partnership at an annual interest rate of 5.83% at December 31, 2009 and 2008. Interest payments are made monthly and the note is due December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the note payable due to the General Partner was $71.5 million and $86.2 million, respectively.

 

15


 

7. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, UDR adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value of Measurements and Disclosures (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) (“Topic 820”), which defines fair value based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:
    Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
    Level 2 — Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated with observable market data.
    Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, notes receivable, accounts receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable, security deposits and prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments were determined by the Operating Partnership using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Operating Partnership would realize on the disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The Operating Partnership adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments (formerly FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”) on June 30, 2009, which require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim as well as annual financial statements. The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of the financial instruments that are allocated to the Operating Partnership, where different, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands) :
                                 
    December 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    Carrying     Estimated     Carrying     Estimated  
    Amounts     Fair Value     Amounts     Fair Value  
 
                               
Debt instruments
                               
Secured debt (a)
  $ 1,122,198     $ 1,136,755     $ 851,901     $ 827,043  
 
                               
Derivative contracts (b)
                               
Interest rate swaps
  $ (3,832 )   $ (3,832 )   $ (4,874 )     (4,874 )
Interest rate caps
    1,992       1,992       33       33  
     
(a)   See Note 5, “Debt”
 
(b)   See Note 8, “Derivatives and Hedging Activity”
We estimate the fair value of our fixed rate debt instruments by discounting the remaining cash flows of the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market credit spread plus the corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a replacement market credit spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit spreads, and time remaining to maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
The General Partner has derivative contracts that are measured and recognized at fair value using the Topic 820 hierarchy. The Operating Partnership is allocated a portion of the derivatives consistent with the allocation of the underlying debt. The derivative contracts are recorded in “Other assets” and in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for $2.0 million and $3.8 million, and $33,000 and $4.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

16


 

The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
To comply with the provisions of ASC Topic 820, the Operating Partnership incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Operating Partnership has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Operating Partnership has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Operating Partnership has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The General Partner is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The General Partner principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The General Partner manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the General Partner enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The General Partner’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the General Partner’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the General Partner’s investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The General Partner’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the General Partner primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the General Partner making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up front premium.
A portion of the General Partner’s interest rate derivatives have been allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the General Partner’s underlying debt instruments allocated to the Operating Partnership. (See Note 5, Debt. )
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)” and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership recorded less than $1,000 of ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and index mismatches between the derivative and the hedged item.
Amounts reported in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)” related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the General Partner’s variable-rate debt that is allocated to the Operating Partnership. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we estimate that an additional $4.1 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.

 

17


 

As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk ( dollar amounts in thousands ):
                 
    Number of        
Interest Rate Derivative   Instruments     Notional  
Interest rate swaps
    5     $ 218,815  
 
               
Interest rate caps
    1     $ 86,180  
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”). Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in a gain of $538,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, we had the following outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships ( dollar amounts in thousands ):
                 
    Number of        
Product   Instruments     Notional  
Interest rate caps
    5     $ 244,194  
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009.
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments (amounts in thousands)
                         
    Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives  
    Balance Sheet           Balance Sheet      
    Location   Fair Value     Location   Fair Value  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
                       
 
                       
Interest Rate Products
  Other Assets   $ 1,046     Other Liabilities   $ 3,832  
 
                   
 
                       
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
      $ 1,046         $ 3,832  
 
                   
 
                       
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
                       
 
                       
Interest Rate Products
  Other Assets   $ 946     Other Liabilities   $  
 
                   
 
                       
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815
      $ 946         $  
 
                   

 

18


 

Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The tables below present the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 ( dollar amounts in thousands ):
                         
            Location of Loss     Amount of Gain or  
    Amount of Gain or (Loss)     Reclassified from     (Loss) Reclassified from  
Derivatives in Topic 815   Recognized in OCI on     Accumulated OCI into     Accumulated OCI into  
Cash Flow Hedging   Derivative (Effective     Income (Effective     Income (Effective  
Relationships   Portion)     Portion)     Portion)  
 
                       
Interest Rate Products
  $ (2,676 )   Interest expense   $ (4,397 )
 
                   
 
                       
Total
  $ (2,676 )           $ (4,397 )
 
                   
                 
            Amount of  
            Gain  
Derivatives Not Designated as   Location of Gain or (Loss)     Recognized in  
Hedging Instruments Under   Recognized in Income on     Income on  
Topic 815   Derivative     Derivative  
 
               
Interest Rate Products
  Other income / (expense)   $ 538  
 
             
 
               
Total
          $ 538  
 
             
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The General Partner has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where (1) if the General Partner defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the General Partner could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the General Partner could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the General Partner’s default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the General Partner ‘s agreements with its derivative counterparties contain provisions where if there is a change in the General Partner’s financial condition that materially changes the General Partner ‘s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the General Partner may be required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The General Partner also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan and financial covenant provisions of the General Partner’s indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would result in the General Partner being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position that were allocated to the Operating Partnership, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $5.1 million. As of December 31, 2009, the General Partner has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the General Partner had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2009, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $5.1 million.

 

19


 

9. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
General Partnership Units
The General Partner has complete discretion to manage and control the operations and business of the Operating Partnership, which includes but is not limited to the acquisition and disposition of real property, construction of buildings and making capital improvements, and the borrowing of funds from outside lenders or UDR and its subsidiaries to finance such activities. The General Partner can authorize, issue, sell, redeem or purchase any OP unit or securities of the Operating Partnership without the approval of the limited partners. The General Partner can also approve, with regard to the issuances of OP units, the class or one or more series of classes, with designations, preferences, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties including rights, powers and duties senior to limited partnership interests without approval of any limited partners. There were 110,883 and 102,410 of general partnership interest at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, all of which were held by UDR.
Limited Partnership Units
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 179,798,525 and 166,060,777, respectively, OP units outstanding of limited partnership interest, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815, respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership OP units. UDR owned 173,811,933 or 96.7% and 158,736,998 or 95.6% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining 5,986,592 or 3.3% and 7,323,779 or 4.4% OP units outstanding of limited partnership interest were held by non- affiliated partners at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which 1,751,671 and 1,617,815, respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership units.
The limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the OP units held by the limited partner at a redemption price equal to and in the form of the Cash Amount (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement), provided that such OP Units have been outstanding for at least one year. UDR, as general partner of the Operating Partnership may, in its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash Amount or the REIT Share Amount (generally one share of common stock of UDR for each OP Unit), as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement. (Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the Operating Partnership Agreement, redemptions related to the Series A Out-Performance Partnership Shares [discussed below] were made on a one for 1.5091 during the period from December 27, 2007 to March 13, 2009.)
The non-affiliated limited partners’ capital is adjusted to redemption value at the end of each reporting period with the corresponding offset against the UDR limited partner capital account based on the redemption rights note above. The aggregate value upon redemption of the then-outstanding OP units held by limited partners was $98.4 million, $101.0 million, and $171.8 million as of December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, based on the value of UDR’s common stock at each period end. Once each OP unit has been redeemed, the redeeming partner has no right to receive any distributions from the Operating Partnership on or after the date of redemption.
Class A Limited Partnership Units
Class A Partnership units have a cumulative annual, non-compounded preferred return, which is equal to 8% based on a value of $16.61 per Class A Limited Partnership Unit.
Holders of the Class A Limited Partnership units exclusively possess certain voting rights. The Operating Partnership may not perform the following without approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership units: (i) increase the authorized or issued amount of Class A Partnership Units, (ii) reclassify any other partnership interest into Class A Partnership Units, (iii) create, authorize or issue any obligations or security convertible into or the right to purchase any Class Partnership Units, without the approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership units, (iv) enter into a merger or acquisition, or (v) amend or modify the Operating Partnership Agreement that affects the rights, preferences or privileges of the Class A Partnership Units.
Allocation of profits and losses
Profit of the Operating Partnership is allocated in the following order: (i) to the General Partner and the Limited Partners in proportion to and up to the amount of cash distributions made during the year, and (ii) to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage interests. Losses and depreciation and amortization expenses, non-recourse liabilities are allocated to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage interests. Losses allocated to the Limited Partners are capped to the extent that such an allocation would not cause a deficit in the Limited Partners capital account. Such losses are, therefore, allocated to the General Partner. If any Partner’s capital balance were to fall into a deficit any income and gains are allocated to each Partner sufficient to eliminate its negative capital balance.

 

20


 

Out-Performance Programs
Series A Out-Performance Program
In May 2001, the Board of Directors of UDR approved the Series A Out-Performance Program (the “Series A Program”) pursuant to which certain executive officers and other key officers of UDR (the “Participants”) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in a limited liability company (the “Series A LLC”), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (“Series A Out-Performance Partnership Shares” or “Series A OPPSs”), for an initial investment of $1.27 million (the full market value of the Series A OPPS, at inception, as determined by an independent investment banking firm). The Series A Program measured the cumulative total return on UDR’s common stock over a 28-month period beginning February 2001 and ending May 31, 2003.
The Series A Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDR’s common stock, measured by the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period, exceeded the greater of (a) the cumulative total return of the Morgan Stanley REIT Index over the same period; and (b) is at least the equivalent of a 30% total return, or 12% annualized.
At the conclusion of the measurement period on May 31, 2003, UDR’s total return satisfied these criteria. As a result, the Series A LLC as holder of the Series A OPPSs received distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and allocations that were received on 1,853,204 OP Units, which distributions and allocations were distributed to the participants on a pro rata basis based on the ownership of the Series A LLC.
Series C Out-Performance Program
In May 2005, the stockholders of UDR approved a new Out-Performance Program and the first series of new Out-Performance Partnership Shares under the program are the Series C Out-Performance Units (the “Series C Program”) pursuant to which certain executive officers and other key employees of UDR (the “Series C Participants”) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in UDR Out-Performance III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Series C LLC”), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (“Series C Out-Performance Partnership Shares” or “Series C OPPSs”). The purchase price for the Series C OPPSs was determined by the Compensation Committee of UDR’s Board of Directors to be $750,000, assuming 100% participation, and was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. UDR’s performance for the Series C Program was measured over the 36-month period from June 1, 2005 to May 30, 2008.
The Series C Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDR’s common stock, as measured by the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period is at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (“Minimum Return”).
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDR’s cumulative total return satisfies these criteria, the Series C LLC as holder of the Series C OPPSs will receive (for the indirect benefit of the Series C Participants as holders of interests in the Series C LLC) distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and allocations that would be received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
i. determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDR’s common stock over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the “Excess Return”);
ii. multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDR’s market capitalization (defined as the average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common stock, common stock equivalents and OP Units); and
iii. dividing the number obtained in clause (ii) by the market value of one share of UDR’s common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average price per day of common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the valuation date.
For the Series C OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to (ii) above is capped at 1% of market capitalization.

 

21


 

If, on the valuation date, the cumulative total return of UDR’s common stock does not meet the Minimum Return, then the Series C Participants will forfeit their entire initial investment.
At the conclusion of the measurement period, May 30, 2008, the total cumulative return on UDR’s common stock did not meet the minimum return threshold. As a result, there were no payouts under the Series C OPPSs program and the investment made by the holders of the Series C OPPSs was forfeited.
Series D Out-Performance Program
In February 2006, the Board of Directors of UDR approved the Series D Out-Performance Program (the “Series D Program”) pursuant to which certain executive officers of UDR (the “Series D Participants”) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in UDR Out-Performance IV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Series D LLC”), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (“Series D Out-Performance Partnership Shares” or “Series D OPPSs”). The Series D Program was part of the New Out-Performance Program approved by UDR’s stockholders in May 2005. The Series D LLC agreed to sell 830,000 membership units unadjusted for the Special Dividend to certain members of UDR’s senior management at a price of $1.00 per unit. The aggregate purchase price of $830,000 for the Series D OPPSs, assuming 100% participation, was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. The Series D Program measured the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 36-month period beginning January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2008.
The Series D Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDR’s common stock, as measured by the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period was at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (“Minimum Return”).
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDR’s cumulative total return satisfied these criteria, the Series D LLC as holder of the Series D OPPSs would receive (for the indirect benefit of the Series D Participants as holders of interests in the Series D LLC) distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and allocations that would have been received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
  i.   determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDR’s common stock over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the “Excess Return”);
 
  ii.   multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDR’s market capitalization (defined as the average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common stock, OP Units, common stock equivalents and OP Units); and
 
  iii.   dividing the number obtained in (ii) by the market value of one share of UDR’s common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average price per day of the common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the valuation date.
For the Series D OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to clause (ii) above was capped at 1% of market capitalization.
At the conclusion of the measurement period, December 31, 2008, the total cumulative return on UDR’s common stock did not meet the minimum return threshold. As a result, there were no payouts under the Series D OPPSs program and the investment made by the holders of the Series D OPPSs was forfeited.
Series E Out-Performance Program
In February 2007, the board of directors of UDR approved the Series E Out-Performance Program (the “Series E Program”) pursuant to which certain executive officers of UDR (the “Series E Participants”) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in UDR Out-Performance V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Series E LLC”), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (“Series E Out-Performance Partnership Shares” or “Series E OPPSs”). The Series E Program was part of the New Out-Performance Program approved by UDR’s stockholders in May 2005. The Series E LLC agreed to sell 805,000 membership units to certain members of UDR’s senior management at a price of $1.00 per unit. The aggregate purchase price of $805,000 for the Series E OPPSs, assuming 100% participation, was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. The Series E Program measured the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 36-month period beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2009.

 

22


 

The Series E Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDR’s common stock, as measured by the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period was at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (“Minimum Return”).
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDR’s cumulative total return satisfied these criteria, the Series E LLC as holder of the Series E OPPSs would receive (for the indirect benefit of the Series E Participants as holders of interests in the Series E LLC) distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and allocations that would have been received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
  i.   determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDR’s common stock over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the “Excess Return”);
 
  ii.   multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDR’s market capitalization (defined as the average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common stock, OP Units, common stock equivalents and OP Units); and
 
  iii.   dividing the number obtained in (ii) by the market value of one share of UDR’s common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average price per day of the common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the valuation date.
For the Series E OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to clause (ii) above was capped at 0.5% of market capitalization.
If, on the valuation date, the cumulative total return of UDR’s common stock did not meet the Minimum Return, then the Series E Participants would forfeit their entire initial investment.
At the conclusion of the measurement period, December 31, 2009, the total cumulative return on UDR’s common stock did not meet the minimum return threshold. As a result, there were no payouts under the Series E OPPSs program and the investment made by the holders of the Series E OPPSs was forfeited.
The following table shows OP Units activities and OP units outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:
                                                 
                    UDR, Inc.              
    Class A Limited     Limited     Limited     General     Out- Performance        
    Partner     Partners     Partner     Partner     Partnership Shares     Total  
Beginning balance at January 1, 2007
    1,617,815       6,423,921       156,391,272       102,410       1,650,322       166,185,740  
 
                                   
 
                                               
OPPS unit forfeiture
                            (22,553 )     (22,553 )
 
                                               
OPPS unit Series A conversion
          1,531,613                   (1,531,613 )      
 
                                               
OP redemptions for UDR stock
          (919,788 )     1,015,944             (96,156 )      
 
                                   
 
                                               
Ending balance at December 31, 2007
    1,617,815       7,035,746       157,407,216       102,410             166,163,187  
 
                                   
 
                                               
OP redemptions for UDR stock
          (1,329,782 )     1,329,782                    
 
                                   
 
                                               
Ending balance at December 31, 2008
    1,617,815       5,705,964       158,736,998       102,410             166,163,187  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Issuance of units through Special Dividend
    133,856       485,986       13,117,906       8,473             13,746,221  
 
                                               
OP redemptions for UDR stock
          (1,957,029 )     1,957,029                    
 
                                   
 
                                               
Ending balance at December 31, 2009
    1,751,671       4,234,921       173,811,933       110,883             179,909,408  
 
                                   

 

23


 

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
Ground Leases
The Operating Partnership owns four communities which are subject to ground leases expiring between 2019 and 2103. The leases are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 840, Leases (formerly SFAS 13). Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2009 are $4.4 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 to 2014, and a total of $295.1 million for years thereafter. For purposes of our ground lease contracts, the Operating Partnership uses the minimum lease payment, if stated in the agreement. For ground lease agreements where there is a reset provision based on the communities appraised value or consumer price index but does not included a specified minimum lease payment, the Operating Partnership uses the current rent over the remainder of the lease term.
UDR incurred $4.6 million, $4.3 million and $1.3 million of ground rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
UDR, L.P. is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Operating Partnership cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal proceedings and claims at this time. UDR, L.P. believes that such liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
11. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting (formerly SFAS 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”) (“Topic 280”), requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Operating Partnership has the same chief operating decision maker as that of its parent, the General Partner. The chief operating decision maker consists of several members of UDR’s executive management team who use several generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business for our reportable operating segments.
The Operating Partnership owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the United States that generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of apartment homes to a diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures of the Operating Partnership’s apartment communities are rental income and net operating income (“NOI”), and are included in the chief operating decision maker’s assessment of UDR’s performance on a consolidated basis. Rental income represents gross market rent less adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less direct property operating expenses. The chief operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key measure of segment profit or loss.
The Operating Partnership’s two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other communities:
    Same store communities represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2008, and held as of December 31, 2009. A comparison of operating results from the prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves 90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months.
 
    Non-mature/other communities represent those communities that were acquired or developed in 2007, 2008 or 2009, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties, joint venture properties, properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of mixed use properties.

 

24


 

Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the aggregation criteria of Topic 280 as each of our apartment communities generally has similar economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Operating Partnership’s reportable segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is provided to the chief operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants contributed 10% or more of the Operating Partnership’s total revenues during the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, or 2007.
The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” The following table details rental income and NOI for the Operating Partnership’s reportable segments for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, and reconciles NOI to income from continuing and discontinued operations per the consolidated statement of operations (dollars in thousands) :
                         
    December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
Reportable apartment home segment rental income
                       
Same Store Communities
                       
Western Region
  $ 176,111     $ 181,314     $ 172,625  
Mid-Atlantic Region
    22,247       21,886       20,096  
Southeastern Region
    37,596       38,415       38,340  
Southwestern Region
    14,889       15,475       14,934  
Non-Mature communities/Other
    102,213       104,922       199,203  
 
                 
 
                       
Total segment and consolidated rental income
  $ 353,056     $ 362,012     $ 445,198  
 
                 
 
                       
Reportable apartment home segment NOI
                       
Same Store Communities
                       
Western Region
  $ 124,770     $ 128,186     $ 120,661  
Mid-Atlantic Region
    15,662       15,380       13,922  
Southeastern Region
    23,698       24,433       24,744  
Southwestern Region
    9,677       10,223       9,864  
Non-Mature communities/Other
    66,761       67,818       124,860  
 
                 
 
                       
Total segment and consolidated NOI
    240,568       246,040       294,051  
 
                 
 
                       
Reconciling items:
                       
Non-property income
    5,695       13,106       150  
Property management
    (9,709 )     (9,956 )     (12,243 )
Other operating expenses
    (4,868 )     (4,400 )     (1,675 )
Depreciation and amortization
    (166,773 )     (154,584 )     (158,533 )
Interest
    (53,547 )     (47,139 )     (47,367 )
General and administrative
    (16,886 )     (19,081 )     (23,033 )
Other depreciation and amortization
          (327 )     (329 )
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property to a joint venture
                98,433  
Net gain on the sale of real estate
    1,475       475,249       44,976  
Non-controlling interests
    (131 )     (1,188 )     (742 )
 
                 
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders
  $ (4,176 )   $ 497,720     $ 193,688  
 
                 

 

25


 

The following table details the assets of the Operating Partnership’s reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands) :
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
               
Reportable apartment home segment assets
               
Same Store Communities
               
Western Region
  $ 1,647,599     $ 1,628,580  
Mid-Atlantic Region
    210,233       205,960  
Southeastern Region
    314,549       310,694  
Southwestern Region
    132,381       131,250  
Non-Mature communities/Other
    1,336,126       1,292,755  
 
           
 
               
Total segment assets
    3,640,888       3,569,239  
Accumulated depreciation
    (717,892 )     (552,369 )
 
           
 
               
Total segment assets — net book value
    2,922,996       3,016,870  
 
           
 
               
Reconciling items:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
    442       3,590  
Restricted cash
    6,865       5,371  
Deferred financing costs, net
    8,727       6,849  
Notes receivable due from third party
          200,000  
Other assets
    22,037       22,171  
 
           
 
               
Total consolidated assets
  $ 2,961,067     $ 3,254,851  
 
           
Capital expenditures related to our same communities totaled $25.5 million, $39.7 million, and $35.8 million for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Capital expenditures related to our non-mature/other communities totaled $6.4 million, $6.0 million, and $30.5 million for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
  i.   Western — Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, Seattle, Sacramento, Inland Empire, Portland, and San Diego
 
  ii.   Mid-Atlantic — Metropolitan DC and Baltimore
 
  iii.   Southeastern — Nashville, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Other Florida
 
  iv.   Southwestern — Dallas and Phoenix

 

26


 

12. UNAUDITED SUMMARIZED CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
Selected consolidated quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts) :
                                 
    Three months ended  
    March 31,     June 30,     September 30,     December 31,  
2009
                               
 
                               
Rental income (a)
  $ 89,860     $ 89,399     $ 87,745     $ 86,052  
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
    3,813       1,461       (3,517 )     (7,277 )
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
    49       1,367       146       (87 )
Income/(loss) attributable to unitholders
    3,861       2,827       (3,371 )     (7,493 )
 
                               
Income/(loss) per OP unit- basic and diluted
  $ 0.02     $ 0.02     $ (0.02 )   $ (0.04 )
 
                               
2008
                               
 
                               
Rental income (a)
  $ 72,236     $ 84,694     $ 89,540     $ 90,204  
Income from continuing operations
    3,179       3,704       1,556       1,197  
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
    489,356       (2,755 )     2,676       (5 )
Income attributable to unitholders
    491,463       952       4,239       1,066  
 
                               
Income per OP unit- basic and diluted
  $ 2.95     $ 0.01     $ 0.03     $ 0.01  
     
(a)   Represents rental income from continuing operations
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding securities of the General Partner (“the “Guarantees”). The Guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder of the applicable securities and to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture whether for principal of or interest on the securities, (and premium if any) and all other monetary obligations of UDR under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities and (b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities.

 

27


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
                                                                                         
                                    Cost of                                
                                    Improvements     Gross Amount at Which                          
            Initial Costs     Total     Capitalized     Carried at Close of Period                          
            Land and     Buildings     Initial     Subsequent     Land and     Buildings     Total                    
            Land     and     Acquisition     to Acquisition     Land     Buildings     Carrying     Accumulated     Date of     Date  
    Encumbrances     Improvements     Improvements     Costs     Costs     Improvements     Improvements     Value     Depreciation     Construction (a)     Acquired  
WESTERN REGION
                                                                                       
Harbor at Mesa Verde
  $ 46,627,165     $ 20,476,466     $ 28,537,805     $ 49,014,271     $ 10,618,870     $ 20,670,994     $ 38,962,147     $ 59,633,141     $ 15,484,576       2003     Jun-03
Pine Brook Village
    18,270,000       2,581,763       25,504,086       28,085,849       4,384,221       3,824,329       28,645,741       32,470,070       10,737,269       1979     Jun-03
Pacific Shores
    19,145,000       7,345,226       22,623,676       29,968,902       7,068,306       7,449,054       29,588,154       37,037,208       11,340,412       2003     Jun-03
Huntington Vista
    30,965,678       8,055,452       22,485,746       30,541,198       5,551,185       8,159,932       27,932,451       36,092,383       10,809,161       1970     Jun-03
Missions at Back Bay
          229,270       14,128,763       14,358,033       1,506,839       10,722,883       5,141,989       15,864,872       2,069,251       1969     Dec-03
Huntington Villas
    55,202,275       61,535,270       18,017,201       79,552,471       3,901,751       61,811,460       21,642,762       83,454,222       7,621,200       1972     Sep-04
Vista Del Rey
    13,287,960       10,670,493       7,079,834       17,750,327       1,350,982       10,720,737       8,380,572       19,101,309       2,906,278       1969     Sep-04
Coronado at Newport — North
    51,022,183       62,515,901       46,082,056       108,597,957       13,483,171       62,881,081       59,200,047       122,081,128       19,779,984       2000     Oct-04
Villa Venetia
          70,825,106       24,179,600       95,004,706       4,578,761       70,879,030       28,704,437       99,583,467       9,557,500       1972     Oct-04
The Arboretum
          29,562,468       14,283,292       43,845,760       4,651,571       29,644,322       18,853,009       48,497,331       6,437,211       1970     Oct-04
Coronado South
    92,753,546       58,784,785       50,066,757       108,851,542       10,707,321       58,998,987       60,559,876       119,558,863       18,980,841       2000     Mar-05
Pine Brook Village II
          25,921,787       60,961,271       86,883,058       1,040,022       25,922,661       62,000,419       87,923,080       5,822,994       1975     May-08
ORANGE COUNTY, CA
    327,273,807       358,503,987       333,950,086       692,454,073       68,842,999       371,685,468       389,611,605       761,297,073       121,546,677                  
2000 Post Street
          9,860,627       44,577,506       54,438,133       6,204,104       10,108,051       50,534,186       60,642,237       15,722,757       1987     Dec-98
Birch Creek
          4,365,315       16,695,509       21,060,824       4,830,938       4,974,519       20,917,243       25,891,762       8,992,023       1968     Dec-98
Highlands Of Marin
          5,995,838       24,868,350       30,864,188       20,819,591       6,565,347       45,118,432       51,683,779       10,873,389       1991     Dec-98
Marina Playa
          6,224,383       23,916,283       30,140,666       6,714,093       6,704,196       30,150,563       36,854,759       12,466,018       1971     Dec-98
Crossroads Apartments
          4,811,488       10,169,520       14,981,008       3,262,201       4,981,126       13,262,083       18,243,209       4,681,688       1986     Jul-04
River Terrace
    33,130,377       22,161,247       40,137,141       62,298,388       1,322,899       22,207,243       41,414,044       63,621,287       10,860,801       2005     Aug-05
Bay Terrace
          8,544,559       14,457,992       23,002,551       1,210,528       8,549,384       15,663,695       24,213,079       3,889,870       1962     Oct-05
Lake Pines
          14,031,365       30,536,982       44,568,347       4,494,356       14,032,728       35,029,975       49,062,703       8,167,660       1972     Nov-05
Highlands of Marin Phase II
          5,352,554       18,558,883       23,911,437       3,472,383       5,516,687       21,867,133       27,383,820       2,631,881       1968     Oct-07
Edgewater
    41,037,000       30,657,223       83,872,319       114,529,542       1,121,379       30,658,037       84,992,884       115,650,921       8,889,460       2007     Mar-08
Almaden Lake Village
    27,000,000       593,923       42,514,864       43,108,787       1,374,282       606,613       43,876,456       44,483,069       3,826,089       1999     Jul-08
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
    101,167,377       112,598,522       350,305,348       462,903,870       54,826,755       114,903,932       402,826,693       517,730,625       91,001,636                  
The Crest
    56,695,508       21,953,480       67,808,654       89,762,134       6,159,041       22,072,766       73,848,409       95,921,175       23,589,881       1989     Sep-04
Rosebeach
          8,414,478       17,449,593       25,864,071       1,397,453       8,461,848       18,799,676       27,261,524       6,073,469       1970     Sep-04
The Villas @ San Dimas
          8,180,619       16,735,364       24,915,983       2,182,227       8,238,635       18,859,575       27,098,210       6,096,833       1981     Oct-04
The Villas at Bonita
          4,498,439       11,699,117       16,197,556       733,750       4,535,953       12,395,353       16,931,306       3,910,957       1981     Oct-04
Ocean Villa
    9,118,462       5,134,982       12,788,885       17,923,867       965,877       5,204,838       13,684,906       18,889,744       4,186,143       1965     Oct-04
Tierra Del Rey
          39,585,534       36,678,725       76,264,259       1,297,920       39,588,890       37,973,289       77,562,179       4,613,762       1999     Dec-07
LOS ANGELES, CA
    65,813,970       87,767,532       163,160,338       250,927,870       12,736,269       88,102,930       175,561,209       263,664,139       48,471,044                  
Crowne Pointe
    11,002,109       2,486,252       6,437,256       8,923,508       3,777,319       2,666,047       10,034,780       12,700,827       4,480,845       1987     Dec-98
Hilltop
    8,545,060       2,173,969       7,407,628       9,581,597       2,733,418       2,526,400       9,788,615       12,315,015       4,080,310       1985     Dec-98
The Kennedy
    18,839,339       6,178,440       22,306,568       28,485,008       784,042       6,195,752       23,073,298       29,269,050       5,604,659       2005     Nov-05
Hearthstone at Merrill Creek
          6,848,144       30,922,147       37,770,291       1,183,116       6,854,137       32,099,270       38,953,407       3,102,096       2000     May-08
Island Square
          21,284,245       89,389,087       110,673,332       1,847,145       21,290,237       91,230,240       112,520,477       7,712,456       2007     Jul-08
SEATTLE, WA
    38,386,509       38,971,050       156,462,686       195,433,736       10,325,040       39,532,574       166,226,203       205,758,776       24,980,365                  
Presidio at Rancho Del Oro
    13,325,000       9,163,939       22,694,492       31,858,431       4,278,261       9,515,265       26,621,427       36,136,692       9,443,315       1987     Jun-04
Villas at Carlsbad
    8,671,273       6,516,636       10,717,601       17,234,237       1,165,928       6,596,917       11,803,248       18,400,165       3,630,228       1966     Oct-04
Summit at Mission Bay
          22,598,529       17,181,401       39,779,930       4,323,759       22,620,629       21,483,060       44,103,689       6,598,142       1953     Nov-04
SAN DIEGO, CA
    21,996,273       38,279,104       50,593,494       88,872,598       9,767,948       38,732,811       59,907,735       98,640,546       19,671,685                  
Boronda Manor
          1,946,423       8,981,742       10,928,165       7,815,427       3,079,131       15,664,461       18,743,592       5,431,440       1979     Dec-98
Garden Court
          888,038       4,187,950       5,075,988       3,997,400       1,424,192       7,649,196       9,073,388       2,723,125       1973     Dec-98
Cambridge Court
          3,038,877       12,883,312       15,922,189       12,364,763       5,119,301       23,167,651       28,286,952       8,390,404       1974     Dec-98
Laurel Tree
          1,303,902       5,115,356       6,419,258       5,155,032       2,056,277       9,518,013       11,574,290       3,306,423       1977     Dec-98
The Pointe At Harden Ranch
          6,388,446       23,853,534       30,241,980       22,641,042       9,695,985       43,187,037       52,883,022       14,625,757       1986     Dec-98
The Pointe At Northridge
          2,043,736       8,028,443       10,072,179       8,776,279       3,190,463       15,657,995       18,848,458       5,479,156       1979     Dec-98
The Pointe At Westlake
          1,329,064       5,334,004       6,663,068       4,854,800       2,105,691       9,412,177       11,517,868       3,233,985       1975     Dec-98
MONTEREY PENINSULA, CA
          16,938,486       68,384,341       85,322,827       65,604,744       26,671,041       124,256,530       150,927,571       43,190,289                  
Verano at Rancho Cucamonga Town Square
    53,773,090       13,557,235       3,645,406       17,202,641       51,738,113       22,856,282       46,084,472       68,940,754       14,612,379       2006     Oct-02
Waterstone at Murrieta
          10,597,865       34,702,760       45,300,625       4,467,706       10,766,548       39,001,783       49,768,331       13,175,753       1990     Nov-04
INLAND EMPIRE, CA
    53,773,090       24,155,100       38,348,166       62,503,266       56,205,819       33,622,830       85,086,255       118,709,085       27,788,132                  
Foothills Tennis Village
    17,408,221       3,617,507       14,542,028       18,159,535       5,016,140       3,918,693       19,256,982       23,175,675       8,898,165       1988     Dec-98
Woodlake Village
    31,154,663       6,772,438       26,966,750       33,739,188       10,469,336       7,626,752       36,581,772       44,208,524       16,996,018       1979     Dec-98
SACRAMENTO, CA
    48,562,884       10,389,945       41,508,778       51,898,723       15,485,477       11,545,446       55,838,754       67,384,200       25,894,184                  
Tualatin Heights
    11,312,843       3,272,585       9,134,089       12,406,674       5,037,441       3,612,751       13,831,364       17,444,115       5,949,885       1989     Dec-98
Andover Park
    17,225,000       2,916,576       16,994,580       19,911,156       6,036,815       3,097,964       22,850,007       25,947,971       7,890,920       1989     Sep-04
Hunt Club
    18,395,000       6,014,006       14,870,326       20,884,332       4,434,125       6,200,539       19,117,918       25,318,457       6,640,143       1985     Sep-04
PORTLAND, OR
    46,932,843       12,203,167       40,998,995       53,202,162       15,508,382       12,911,254       55,799,290       68,710,544       20,480,949                  
 
                                                                     
TOTAL WESTERN REGION
    703,906,754       699,806,892       1,243,712,232       1,943,519,124       309,303,433       737,708,284       1,515,114,273       2,252,822,557       423,024,961                  
 
                                                                     

 

28


 

UNITED DOMION REALTY, L.P.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED — (Continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
                                                                                         
                                    Cost of                                
                                    Improvements     Gross Amount at Which                          
            Initial Costs     Total     Capitalized     Carried at Close of Period                          
            Land and     Buildings     Initial     Subsequent     Land and     Buildings     Total                    
            Land     and     Acquisition     to Acquisition     Land     Buildings     Carrying     Accumulated     Date of     Date  
    Encumbrances     Improvements     Improvements     Costs     Costs     Improvements     Improvements     Value     Depreciation     Construction (a)     Acquired  
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
                                                                                       
The Whitmore
          6,417,889       13,411,278       19,829,167       19,365,296       7,420,651       31,773,812       39,194,463       11,523,493       2008     Apr-02
Ridgewood
          5,612,147       20,085,474       25,697,621       6,656,435       5,789,750       26,564,306       32,354,056       12,497,527       1988     Aug-02
The Calvert
          262,807       11,188,623       11,451,430       14,173,170       8,264,652       17,359,948       25,624,600       6,920,949       1962     Nov-03
Wellington Place at Olde Town
    28,680,802       13,753,346       36,059,193       49,812,539       15,850,078       14,474,320       51,188,297       65,662,617       14,325,997       2008     Sep-05
Andover House
    36,127,024       14,357,021       51,577,112       65,934,133       2,125,845       14,359,813       53,700,165       68,059,978       8,548,042       2004     Mar-07
Sullivan Place
          1,136,778       103,676,103       104,812,881       2,155,733       1,173,249       105,795,365       106,968,614       12,678,340       2007     Dec-07
Delancey at Shirlington
          21,605,992       66,765,252       88,371,244       658,983       21,611,692       67,418,535       89,030,227       6,807,335       2006/07     Mar-08
Circle Towers
    69,214,719       33,010,740       107,051,197       140,061,937       3,401,703       32,815,406       110,648,234       143,463,640       10,867,671       1972     Mar-08
METROPOLITAN, DC
    134,022,545       96,156,719       409,814,232       505,970,952       64,387,244       105,909,533       464,448,662       570,358,196       84,169,353                  
Lakeside Mill
    15,241,992       2,665,869       10,109,175       12,775,044       3,175,979       2,821,986       13,129,037       15,951,023       7,941,043       1989     Dec-99
Tamar Meadow
    16,075,701       4,144,926       17,149,514       21,294,440       3,914,310       4,457,718       20,751,032       25,208,750       9,343,582       1990     Nov-02
Calvert’s Walk
    19,500,000       4,408,192       24,692,115       29,100,307       4,790,617       4,546,169       29,344,755       33,890,924       10,580,495       1988     Mar-04
Liriope Apartments
          1,620,382       6,790,681       8,411,063       732,897       1,628,063       7,515,897       9,143,960       2,711,366       1997     Mar-04
20 Lambourne
    32,000,000       11,749,575       45,589,714       57,339,289       2,525,271       11,777,026       48,087,534       59,864,560       5,286,929       2003     Mar-08
BALTIMORE, MD
    82,817,692       24,588,944       104,331,199       128,920,143       15,139,074       25,230,962       118,828,255       144,059,216       35,863,415                  
 
                                                                     
TOTAL MID-ATLANTIC REGION
    216,840,238       120,745,663       514,145,431       634,891,094       79,526,318       131,140,495       583,276,917       714,417,412       120,032,768                  
 
                                                                     
 
                                                                                       
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
                                                                                       
Sugar Mill Creek
    10,185,064       2,241,880       7,552,520       9,794,400       5,344,307       2,647,456       12,491,251       15,138,707       5,751,666       1988     Dec-98
Inlet Bay
          7,701,679       23,149,670       30,851,349       10,177,448       8,409,425       32,619,372       41,028,797       14,725,170       1988/89     Jun-03
MacAlpine Place
          10,869,386       36,857,512       47,726,898       3,543,389       10,947,551       40,322,736       51,270,287       13,027,338       2001     Dec-04
TAMPA, FL
    10,185,064       20,812,945       67,559,702       88,372,647       19,065,143       22,004,432       85,433,359       107,437,790       33,504,173                  
Legacy Hill
          1,147,660       5,867,567       7,015,227       7,414,277       1,668,638       12,760,866       14,429,504       7,878,230       1977     Nov-95
Hickory Run
          1,468,727       11,583,786       13,052,513       7,312,612       1,959,094       18,406,031       20,365,125       9,029,778       1989     Dec-95
Carrington Hills
    20,204,103       2,117,244             2,117,244       31,294,081       4,133,316       29,278,009       33,411,325       13,245,118       1999     Dec-95
Brookridge
          707,508       5,461,251       6,168,759       3,424,991       989,147       8,604,603       9,593,750       4,703,651       1986     Mar-96
Breckenridge
          766,428       7,713,862       8,480,290       3,207,484       1,125,805       10,561,969       11,687,774       5,204,746       1986     Mar-97
Polo Park
          4,582,666       16,293,022       20,875,688       14,659,449       5,485,024       30,050,113       35,535,137       8,253,655       2008     May-06
NASHVILLE, TN
    20,204,103       10,790,233       46,919,488       57,709,721       67,312,895       15,361,024       109,661,591       125,022,616       48,315,178                  
St Johns Plantation
          4,288,214       33,101,763       37,389,977       4,578,015       4,414,682       37,553,310       41,967,992       11,355,762       2006     Jun-05
JACKSONVILLE, FL
          4,288,214       33,101,763       37,389,977       4,578,014       4,414,682       37,553,310       41,967,992       11,355,762                  
The Reserve and The Park at Riverbridge
    40,133,018       15,968,090       56,400,716       72,368,806       3,287,053       16,123,077       59,532,782       75,655,859       18,734,255       1999/2001     Dec-04
OTHER FLORIDA
    40,133,018       15,968,090       56,400,716       72,368,806       3,287,053       16,123,077       59,532,782       75,655,859       18,734,255                  
 
                                                                     
TOTAL SOUTHEASTERN REGION
    70,522,186       51,859,482       203,981,669       255,841,151       94,243,106       57,903,215       292,181,042       350,084,257       111,909,367                  
 
                                                                     
 
                                                                                       
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
                                                                                       
THIRTY377
    31,175,000       24,035,881       32,950,822       56,986,703       4,887,121       24,139,018       37,734,806       61,873,824       8,199,741       2007     Aug-06
Legacy Village
    64,090,000       16,881,795       100,101,840       116,983,635       2,413,489       16,889,308       102,507,816       119,397,124       11,014,059       2005/06/07     Mar-08
DALLAS, TX
    95,265,000       40,917,676       133,052,662       173,970,338       7,300,610       41,028,327       140,242,621       181,270,948       19,213,800                  
Sierra Foothills
    20,770,824       2,728,172             2,728,172       20,432,147       4,985,042       18,175,277       23,160,319       11,661,524       1998     Feb-98
Finisterra
          1,273,798       26,392,207       27,666,005       3,202,796       1,571,058       29,297,743       30,868,801       11,684,634       1997     Mar-98
Sierra Canyon
    14,893,446       1,809,864       12,963,581       14,773,445       1,704,350       2,009,699       14,468,096       16,477,795       7,361,765       2001     Dec-01
PHOENIX, AZ
    35,664,270       5,811,834       39,355,788       45,167,621       25,339,294       8,565,799       61,941,116       70,506,915       30,707,923                  
Barton Creek Landing
          3,150,998       14,269,086       17,420,084       9,867,134       3,201,989       24,085,229       27,287,218       8,402,460       1986     Mar-02
AUSTIN, TX
          3,150,998       14,269,086       17,420,084       9,867,134       3,201,989       24,085,229       27,287,218       8,402,460                  
Inn @ Los Patios
          3,005,300       11,544,700       14,550,000       (1,453,572 )     3,023,264       10,073,164       13,096,428       3,574,516       1990     Aug-98
OTHER TEXAS
          3,005,300       11,544,700       14,550,000       (1,453,572 )     3,023,264       10,073,164       13,096,428       3,574,516                  
 
                                                                     
TOTAL SOUTHWESTERN REGION
    130,929,270       52,885,808       198,222,236       251,108,043       41,053,465       55,819,379       236,342,129       292,161,509       61,898,699                  
 
                                                                     
 
                                                                                       
TOTAL APARTMENTS
    1,122,198,447       925,297,845       2,160,061,568       3,085,359,413       524,126,322       982,571,373       2,626,914,362       3,609,485,735       716,865,795                  
 
                                                                                       
LAND
                                                                                       
Presidio
          1,523,922             1,523,922       923,218       1,300,000       1,147,140       2,447,140                        
UDR Pacific Los Alisos, LP
          17,297,661             17,297,661       2,111,335       16,384,597       3,024,399       19,408,996                        
 
                                                                     
TOTAL LAND
          18,821,583             18,821,583       3,034,553       17,684,597       4,171,539       21,856,136                        
 
                                                                     
 
                                                                                       
COMMERCIAL HELD FOR INVESTMENT
                                                                                       
The Calvert — commercial side
          34,128       1,597,359       1,631,487       1,175,098       1,171,995       1,634,590       2,806,585       569,920                  
Circle Towers Office Bldg
          1,406,626       4,498,210       5,904,836       877,163       1,380,054       5,401,945       6,739,289       457,484                  
 
                                                                     
TOTAL COMMERCIAL
          1,440,754       6,095,569       7,536,322       2,009,552       2,554,162       6,991,712       9,545,874       1,025,707                  
 
                                                                     
 
                                                                                       
TOTAL REAL ESTATE OWNED
  $ 1,122,198,447     $ 945,560,181     $ 2,166,157,136     $ 3,111,717,318     $ 529,170,426     $ 1,002,810,132     $ 2,638,077,612     $ 3,640,887,744     $ 717,891,503                  
 
                                                                     
     
(a)   Date of construction or date of last major renovation.
The depreciable life for all buildings is 35 years.

 

29


 

3-YEAR ROLLFORWARD OF REAL ESTATE OWNED AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
The following is a reconciliation of the carrying amount of total real estate owned at December 31:
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
Balance at beginning of the year
  $ 3,569,239,133     $ 3,639,378,797     $ 3,621,449,009  
Real estate acquired
          801,852,426       271,589,766  
Capital expenditures and development
    71,648,612       84,313,277       92,236,917  
Real estate transferred
                (18,416,055 )
Real estate sold
          (956,305,367 )     (327,480,840 )
 
                 
 
                       
Balance at end of year
  $ 3,640,887,745     $ 3,569,239,133     $ 3,639,378,797  
 
                 
The following is a reconciliation of total accumulated depreciation for real estate owned at December 31:
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
Balance at beginning of the year
  $ 552,369,019     $ 754,995,588     $ 689,243,781  
Depreciation expense for the year
    165,756,124       148,997,413       158,523,619  
Accumulated depreciation on assets transferred to UDR
                (790,809 )
Accumulated depreciation on asset retirements
    (233,641 )            
Accumulated depreciation on real estate sold
          (351,623,983 )     (91,981,003 )
 
                 
 
                       
Balance at end of year
  $ 717,891,502     $ 552,369,018     $ 754,995,588  
 
                 

 

30


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (unaudited)     (audited)  
ASSETS
               
 
               
Real estate owned:
               
Real estate held for investment
  $ 3,675,055     $ 3,640,888  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (800,852 )     (717,892 )
 
           
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation
    2,874,203       2,922,996  
Cash and cash equivalents
    358       442  
Restricted cash
    7,298       6,865  
Deferred financing costs, net
    8,083       8,727  
Other assets
    18,649       22,037  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 2,908,591     $ 2,961,067  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
               
 
               
Secured debt
  $ 1,132,244     $ 1,122,198  
Note payable due to General Partner
    71,547       71,547  
Real estate taxes payable
    5,491       8,561  
Accrued interest payable
    471       933  
Security deposits and prepaid rent
    12,179       13,728  
Distributions payable
    32,660       32,642  
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property
    63,838       63,838  
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
    33,229       25,872  
 
           
Total liabilities
    1,351,659       1,339,319  
 
               
Capital:
               
Partners’ capital:
               
Operating partnership units: 179,909,408 OP units outstanding:
               
General partner: 110,883 OP units outstanding
    1,411       1,456  
Limited partners: 179,798,525 OP units outstanding
    2,125,494       2,199,450  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (6,052 )     (3,153 )
 
           
Total partners’ capital
    2,120,853       2,197,753  
Receivable due from General Partner
    (576,136 )     (588,185 )
Non-controlling interest
    12,215       12,180  
 
           
Total capital
    1,556,932       1,621,748  
 
           
Total liabilities and capital
  $ 2,908,591     $ 2,961,067  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

31


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data)
(unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
REVENUES
                               
Rental income
  $ 87,095     $ 89,399     $ 173,295     $ 179,260  
Non-property income:
                               
Other income
    84       1,999       1,556       5,656  
 
                       
Total revenues
    87,179       91,398       174,851       184,916  
 
                               
EXPENSES
                               
Rental expenses:
                               
Real estate taxes and insurance
    10,561       10,357       21,602       21,729  
Personnel
    7,070       6,818       13,967       13,602  
Utilities
    4,068       4,046       8,887       8,620  
Repair and maintenance
    4,403       4,347       8,587       8,298  
Administrative and marketing
    1,756       1,875       3,498       3,613  
Property management
    2,395       2,458       4,766       4,930  
Other operating expenses
    1,243       1,225       2,468       2,457  
Real estate depreciation and amortization
    41,693       41,437       83,123       83,290  
Interest expense:
                               
Interest on secured debt
    12,860       12,303       25,829       22,598  
Interest on note payable due to General Partner
    106       1,257       212       2,515  
General and administrative
    5,283       3,724       10,655       7,811  
Other depreciation and amortization
          91             181  
 
                       
Total expenses
    91,438       89,938       183,594       179,644  
 
                       
(Loss)/income from operations and continuing operations
    (4,259 )     1,460       (8,743 )     5,272  
Income from discontinued operations
    37       1,367       97       1,416  
 
                       
Consolidated net (loss)/income
    (4,222 )     2,827       (8,646 )     6,688  
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
    (18 )           (35 )      
 
                       
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (4,240 )   $ 2,827     $ (8,681 )   $ 6,688  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per OP unit- basic and diluted:
                               
(Loss)/income from continuing operations attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (0.02 )   $ 0.01     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.03  
Income from discontinued operations
  $ 0.00     $ 0.01     $ 0.00     $ 0.01  
(Loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (0.02 )   $ 0.02     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.04  
 
                               
Weighted average OP units outstanding
    179,909       179,909       179,909       177,707  
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

32


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
(unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Operating Activities
               
Consolidated net loss
  $ (8,646 )   $ (6,688 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    83,123       83,290  
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property
    (97 )     (1,367 )
Write off of bad debt
    718       1,217  
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other
    748       774  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease in operating assets
    2,253       1,341  
Decrease in operating liabilities
    (859 )     (8,728 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    77,240       69,839  
 
               
Investing Activities
               
Capital expenditures and other major improvements — real estate assets, net of escrow reimbursement
    (28,248 )     (32,290 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (28,248 )     (32,290 )
 
               
Financing Activities
               
Net repayments and distributions to UDR, Inc.
    (55,926 )     (240,327 )
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt
    11,326       223,422  
Payments on secured debt
    (1,281 )     (15,058 )
Payment of financing costs
    (104 )     (2,087 )
OP unit redemption
    (327 )      
Distributions paid to non-affiliated partnership unitholders
    (2,764 )     (3,216 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (49,076 )     (37,266 )
 
               
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (84 )     283  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    442       3,590  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 358     $ 3,873  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Information:
               
Interest paid during the year, net of amounts capitalized
  $ 26,155     $ 21,738  
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

33


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
                                                                         
                    UDR, Inc.     Accumulated Other     Total     Receivable due              
    Class A Limited     Limited     Limited     General     Comprehensive     Partnership     from General     Non-Controlling        
    Partner     Partners     Partner     Partner     Income/(Loss)     Capital     Partner     Interest     Total  
 
                                                                       
Balance, January 1, 2010
  $ 28,797     $ 69,622     $ 2,101,031     $ 1,456     $ (3,153 )   $ 2,197,753     $ (588,185 )   $ 12,180     $ 1,621,748  
 
                                                                       
Distributions
    (1,164 )     (1,516 )     (62,600 )     (40 )           (65,320 )                 (65,320 )
 
                                                                       
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR
          (337 )     337                                      
 
                                                                       
OP Unit Redemptions for cash
          (327 )     327                                      
 
                                                                       
Adjustment to reflect limited partners’ capital at redemption value
    5,960       7,995       (13,955 )                                    
 
                                                                       
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
                                                                       
 
                                                                       
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments
                            (2,899 )     (2,899 )                 (2,899 )
 
                                                                       
Net income/(loss)
    (85 )     (197 )     (8,394 )     (5 )           (8,681 )           35       (8,646 )
 
                                                     
 
                                                                       
Total comprehensive income/(loss)
    (85 )     (197 )     (8,394 )     (5 )     (2,899 )     (11,580 )           35       (11,545 )
 
                                                                       
Net change in receivable due from General Partner
                                        12,049             12,049  
 
                                                     
 
                                                                       
Balance, June 30, 2010
  $ 33,508     $ 75,240     $ 2,016,746     $ 1,411     $ (6,052 )   $ 2,120,853     $ (576,136 )   $ 12,215     $ 1,556,932  
 
                                                     
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

34


 

UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (“UDR, L.P.”, the “Operating Partnership”, “we” or “our”) is a Delaware limited partnership, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, redevelops, manages, and disposes of multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets located in the United States. The high barrier-to-entry markets are characterized by limited land for new construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement process, expensive single-family home prices and significant employment growth potential. UDR, L.P. is a subsidiary of UDR, Inc. (“UDR” or the “General Partner”) , a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and through which UDR conducts a significant portion of its business. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues of the Operating Partnership represented of 56% and 59% of the General Partner’s consolidated revenues. At June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership’s apartment portfolio consisted of 81 communities located in 19 markets consisting of 23,351 apartment homes.
Interests in UDR, L.P. are represented by Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”). The Operating Partnership’s net income is allocated to the partners, which is initially based on their respective distributions made during the year and secondly, their percentage interests. Distributions are made in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”), on a per unit basis that is generally equal to the dividend per share on UDR’s common stock, which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “UDR”.
As of June 30, 2010, there were 179,909,408 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which, 174,224,574 or 96.8% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 5,684,834 or 3.2%, which were owned by non-affiliated limited partners. There were 179,909,408 OP units in the Operating Partnership outstanding as of December 31, 2009 of which, 173,922,816 or 96.7% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 5,986,592 or 3.3%, which were owned by non-affiliated limited partners. See Note 9, Capital Structure .
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position as of June 30, 2010, and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The interim results presented are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for a full year. The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 30, 2010.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Operating Partnership evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial statements were issued. Except as noted in Note 13, Subsequent Event , no other recognized or non-recognized subsequent events were noted.

 

35


 

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Policies
Real Estate Sales
For sales transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as the Operating Partnership no longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the related assets and liabilities from our consolidated balance sheet and record the gain or loss in the period the transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for the transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales of real estate to entities in which we retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize profit proportionate to the interest of the buyer in the real estate and defer the gain on the interest we retain in the real estate. The Operating Partnership will recognize any deferred gain when the property is then sold to a third party. In transactions accounted by us as partial sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority equity interest in the venture was provided a preference as to cash flows in either an operating or a capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the entire property.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidation (originally issued as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46(R)”), which (1) addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept from ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing (formerly SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”), and (2) responds to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation (formerly FIN 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”), including concerns over the transparency of enterprises’ involvement with variable interest entities. ASC 810 became effective for the Operating Partnership on January 1, 2010 and adoption had no impact on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” an amendment to ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This amendment provides for more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. ASU No. 2010-06 became effective for the Operating Partnership for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with one new disclosure effective after December 15, 2010. See Note 7, Fair Value of Derivatives and Financial Instruments .
Income taxes
The taxable income or loss of the Operating Partnership is reported on the tax returns of the partners. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes. The Partnership’s tax returns are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Net income for financial reporting purposes differs from the net income for income tax reporting purposes primarily due to temporary differences, principally real estate depreciation and the tax deferral of certain gains on property sales. The differences in depreciation result from differences in the book and tax basis of certain real estate assets and the differences in the methods of depreciation and lives of the real estate assets.
The Operating Partnership adopted certain accounting guidance within ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes , with respect to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements. The guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Operating Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management of the Operating Partnership is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. The Operating Partnership has no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.

 

36


 

Management of the Operating Partnership has reviewed all open tax years and major jurisdictions and concluded the adoption of the new accounting guidance resulted in no impact to the Operating Partnership’s financial position or results of operations. There is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in future tax returns.
Earnings per OP unit
Basic earnings per OP Unit is computed by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to general and limited partner units by the weighted average number of general and limited partner units (including redeemable OP Units) outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per OP Unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue OP Units were exercised or converted into OP Units or resulted in the issuance of OP Units that shared in the earnings of the Operating Partnership. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were no dilutive instruments outstanding, and therefore, diluted earnings per OP Unit and basic earnings per OP Unit are the same.
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Operating Partnership consists of income producing operating properties and land held for future development. At June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership owned and consolidated 81 communities in 8 states plus the District of Columbia totaling 23,351 apartment homes. The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Land
  $ 987,735     $ 985,126  
Depreciable property — held and used
               
Buildings and improvements
    2,549,755       2,525,812  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    112,500       108,094  
Land held for future development
    25,065       21,856  
 
           
Real estate held for investment
    3,675,055       3,640,888  
Accumulated depreciation
    (800,852 )     (717,892 )
 
           
 
               
Real estate owned, net
  $ 2,874,203     $ 2,922,996  
 
           
The Operating Partnership did not have any acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations represent properties that the Operating Partnership has either sold or which management believes meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. In order to be classified as held for sale and reported as discontinued operations, a property’s operations and cash flows have or will be divested to a third party by the Operating Partnership whereby UDR, L.P. will not have any significant continuing involvement in the ownership or operation of the property after the sale or disposition. The results of operations of the property are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented and do not impact the net earnings reported by the Operating Partnership. Once a property is deemed as held for sale, depreciation is no longer recorded. However, if the Operating Partnership determines that the property no longer meets the criteria of held for sale, the Operating Partnership will recapture any unrecorded depreciation for the property. The assets and liabilities of properties deemed as held for sale are presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Properties deemed as held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell the assets.
The Operating Partnership did not dispose of any communities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, nor did we have any communities classified as held for disposition at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Operating Partnership recognized $37,000 and $97,000 and $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of “Income from Discontinued Operations” which relate to residual activities from sold communities.

 

37


 

5. DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of classification in the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Operating Partnership having effectively established the fixed interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured debt consists of the following as of June 30, 2010 ( dollars in thousands ):
                                         
                    Six Months Ended June 30, 2010        
    Principal Outstanding     Weighted     Weighted     Number of  
    June 30,     December 31,     Average     Average     Communities  
    2010     2009     Interest Rate     Years to Maturity     Encumbered  
Fixed Rate Debt
                                       
Mortgage notes payable
  $ 229,572     $ 230,852       5.58 %     3.3       6  
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
    13,325       13,325       5.30 %     20.7       1  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    587,403       587,403       5.30 %     6.6       12  
 
                             
Total fixed rate secured debt
    830,300       831,580       5.38 %     5.9       19  
 
                                       
Variable Rate Debt
                                       
Mortgage notes payable
    100,590       100,590       2.82 %     4.7       4  
Tax-exempt secured note payable
    27,000       27,000       1.38 %     19.7       1  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    174,354       163,028       2.01 %     5.2       15  
 
                             
Total variable rate secured debt
    301,944       290,618       2.22 %     6.3       20  
 
                             
Total secured debt
  $ 1,132,244     $ 1,122,198       4.52 %     6.0       39  
 
                             
As of June 30, 2010, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General Partner’s option. At June 30, 2010, $948.6 million of the funded balance was fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance of $260.5 million on these facilities had a weighted average variable rate of 1.8%. $761.8 million of these credit facilities were allocated to the Operating Partnership at June 30, 2010 based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    (dollar amounts in thousands)  
 
               
Borrowings outstanding
  $ 761,757     $ 750,431  
Weighted average borrowings during the period ended
    759,728       646,895  
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended
    762,160       750,572  
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended
    4.6 %     4.6 %
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period
    4.6 %     4.6 %
The Operating Partnership may from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt instruments. In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair value and amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life of the underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair value adjustment of the fixed rate debt instruments on the Operating Partnership’s properties was a net discount of $1.2 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

 

38


 

Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from February 2011 through June 2016 and carry interest rates ranging from 5.03% to 5.94%.
Tax-exempt secured notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt housing bond issues mature in March 2031 and carry an interest rate of 5.30%. Interest on these notes is payable in semi-annual installments.
Secured credit facilities. At June 30, 2010, the General Partner had borrowings against its fixed rate facilities of $948.6 million of which $587.4 million was allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of June 30, 2010, the fixed rate Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted average fixed rate of interest of 5.30%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from July 2013 through April 2016. Interest on the variable rate mortgage notes is based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which translated into interest rates ranging from 1.17% to 3.98% at June 30, 2010.
Tax-exempt secured note payable. The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly installments. The mortgage note payable has an interest rate of 1.38% as of June 30, 2010.
Secured credit facilities. At June 30, 2010, the General Partner had borrowings against its variable rate facilities of $260.5 million of which $174.4 million was allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of June 30, 2010, the variable rate borrowings under the Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted average floating rate of interest of 2.01%.
The aggregate maturities of the Operating Partnership’s secured debt due during each of the next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
                                                         
    Fixed     Variable        
    Mortgage     Tax-Exempt     Credit     Mortgage     Tax Exempt     Credit        
    Notes     Notes Payable     Facilities     Notes     Notes Payable     Facilities     Total  
 
2010
  $ 1,368     $     $     $     $     $     $ 1,368  
2011
    47,081             36,243       404             28,641       112,369  
2012
    49,635             126,849       605             59,529       236,618  
2013
    61,318             25,723       38,024                   125,065  
2014
                      610                   610  
Thereafter
    70,170       13,325       398,588       60,947       27,000       86,184       656,214  
 
                                         
Total
  $ 229,572     $ 13,325     $ 587,403     $ 100,590     $ 27,000     $ 174,354     $ 1,132,244  
 
                                         
Guarantor on Unsecured Debt
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partner’s unsecured credit facility, with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $133.9 million and $189.3 million, respectively.

 

39


 

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Receivable due from the General Partner
The Operating Partnership participates in the General Partner’s central cash management program, wherein all the Operating Partnership’s cash receipts are remitted to the General Partner and all cash disbursements are funded by the General Partner. In addition, other miscellaneous costs such as administrative expenses are incurred by the General Partner on behalf of the Operating Partnership. As a result of these various transactions between the Operating Partnership and the General Partner, the Operating Partnership had a net receivable balance of $576.1 million and $588.2 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which is reflected as a reduction in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The General Partner performs various general and administrative and other overhead services for the Operating Partnership including legal assistance, acquisitions analysis, marketing and advertising, and allocates these expenses to the Operating Partnership first on the basis of direct usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated based on its pro-rata portion of UDR’s total apartment homes. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the general and administrative expenses allocated to the Operating Partnership by UDR were $7.6 million and $15.1 million and $6.0 million and $12.4 million, respectively, and are included in “General and Administrative” expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. In the opinion of management, this method of allocation reflects the level of services received by the Operating Partnership from the General Partner.
Guaranty by the General Partner
The General Partner provided a “bottom dollar” guaranty to certain limited partners as part of their original contribution to the Operating Partnership. The guaranty protects the tax basis of the underlying contribution and is reflected on the OP unitholder’s Schedule K-1 tax form. The guaranty was made in the form of a loan from the General Partner to the Operating Partnership at an annual interest rate of 0.593% and 5.83% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Interest payments are made monthly and the note is due December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the note payable due to the General Partner was $71.5 million.
7. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:
    Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
    Level 2 — Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated with observable market data.
    Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

 

40


 

The estimated fair values of the Operating Partnership’s financial instruments either recorded or disclosed on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands) :
                                 
            Fair Value at June 30, 2010 Using  
            Quoted Prices in              
            Active Markets for     Significant Other     Significant  
            Identical Assets or     Observable     Unobservable  
            Liabilities     Inputs     Inputs  
    June 30, 2010     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
 
                               
Description:
                               
 
                               
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
  $ 401     $     $ 401     $  
 
                       
Total assets
  $ 401     $     $ 401     $  
 
                       
 
                               
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
  $ 5,662     $     $ 5,662     $  
Contingent purchase consideration (c)
    6,037                   6,037  
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a)
                               
Mortgage notes payable
    244,742                   244,742  
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
    15,444                   15,444  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    609,562                   609,562  
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a)
                               
Mortgage notes payable
    100,590                   100,590  
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
    27,000                   27,000  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    174,354                   174,354  
 
                       
Total liabilities
  $ 1,183,391     $     $ 5,662     $ 1,177,729  
 
                       
                                 
            Fair Value at December 31, 2009 Using  
            Quoted Prices in              
            Active Markets for     Significant Other     Significant  
            Identical Assets or     Observable     Unobservable  
            Liabilities     Inputs     Inputs  
    December 31, 2009     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
 
                               
Description:
                               
 
                               
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
    1,992             1,992        
 
                       
Total assets
  $ 1,992     $     $ 1,992     $  
 
                       
 
                               
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b)
  $ 3,832     $     $ 3,832     $  
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a)
                               
Mortgage notes payable
    239,814                   239,814  
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
    13,540                   13,540  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    592,783                   592,783  
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a)
                               
Mortgage notes payable
    100,590                   100,590  
Tax-exempt secured notes payable
    27,000                   27,000  
Fannie Mae credit facilities
    163,028                   163,028  
 
                       
Total liabilities
  $ 1,140,587     $     $ 3,832     $ 1,136,755  
 
                       
     
(a)   See Note 5, Debt
 
(b)   See Note 8, Derivatives and Hedging Activity
 
(c)   As of June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership accrued a liability of $6.0 million related to a contingent purchase consideration on one of its properties. The contingent consideration was determined based on the fair market value of the related asset which is estimated using Level 3 inputs utilized in a third party appraisal.

 

41


 

Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
The Operating Partnership incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Operating Partnership has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Operating Partnership has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Operating Partnership has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
At June 30, 2010, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable, security deposits and prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments were determined by the Operating Partnership using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Operating Partnership would realize on the disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The General Partner estimates the fair value of our debt instruments by discounting the remaining cash flows of the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market credit spread plus the corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a replacement market credit spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit spreads, time remaining to maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
The Operating Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less than the net book value of those assets. Cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to reflect management’s best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair value. The General Partner’s estimates of fair value represent management’s estimates based upon Level 3 inputs such as industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.

 

42


 

8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Operating Partnership is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The General Partner principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The General Partner manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the General Partner enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The General Partner’s and the Operating Partnership’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the General Partner’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the General Partner’s investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The General Partner’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the General Partner primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the General Partner making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up front premium.
A portion of the General Partner’s interest rate derivatives have been allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the General Partner’s underlying debt instruments allocated to the Operating Partnership. (See Note 5, Debt. )
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)” and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Operating Partnership recorded less than $1,000 of ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and index mismatches between the derivative and the hedged item.
Amounts reported in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)” related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the General Partner’s variable-rate debt that is allocated to the Operating Partnership. Through June 30, 2011, we estimate that an additional $3.1 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
As of June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk ( dollar amounts in thousands ):
                 
    Number of        
Interest Rate Derivative   Instruments     Notional  
Interest rate swaps
    6     $ 267,790  
 
Interest rate caps
    2       109,275  
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”). Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in losses of $182,000 and $675,000 and gains of $643,000 and $601,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships ( dollar amounts in thousands ):
                 
    Number of        
Product   Instruments     Notional  
Interest rate caps
    4     $ 218,815  

 

43


 

Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Operating Partnership’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
                                         
    Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives  
        Fair Value at:         Fair Value at:  
    Balance   June 30,     December 31,     Balance   June 30,     December 31,  
    Sheet Location   2010     2009     Sheet Location   2010     2009  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
                                       
Interest Rate Products
  Other Assets   $ 229     $ 1,046     Other Liabilities   $ 5,662     $ 3,832  
 
                               
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
      $ 229     $ 1,046         $ 5,662     $ 3,832  
 
                               
 
                                       
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
                                       
Interest Rate Products
  Other Assets   $ 172     $ 946     Other Liabilities   $     $  
 
                               
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
      $ 172     $ 946         $     $  
 
                               
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The tables below present the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 ( dollar amounts in thousands ):
                                     
                    Location of Loss      
                    Reclassified from   Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified  
    Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in     Accumulated OCI into   from Accumulated OCI into Income  
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging   OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)     Income (Effective   (Effective Portion)  
Relationships   2010     2009     Portion)   2010     2009  
 
                                   
For the three months ended June 30,
                                   
 
                                   
Interest Rate Products
  $ (1,203 )   $ (1,134 )   Interest expense   $ (2,737 )   $ (2,558 )
 
                           
Total
  $ (1,203 )   $ (1,134 )       $ (2,737 )   $ (2,558 )
 
                           
 
                                   
For the six months ended June 30,
                                   
 
                                   
Interest Rate Products
  $ (1,850 )   $ (1,931 )   Interest expense   $ (4,749 )   $ (6,042 )
 
                           
Total
  $ (1,850 )   $ (1,931 )       $ (4,749 )   $ (6,042 )
 
                           

 

44


 

                     
    Location of Gain or (Loss)   Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized  
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging   Recognized in Income on   in Income on Derivative  
Instruments   Derivative   2010     2009  
 
                   
For the three months ended June 30,
                   
 
                   
Interest Rate Products
  Other income / (expense)   $ (182 )   $ 643  
 
               
 
                   
Total
      $ (182 )   $ 643  
 
               
 
                   
For the six months ended June 30,
                   
 
                   
Interest Rate Products
  Other income / (expense)   $ (675 )   $ 601  
 
               
 
                   
Total
      $ (675 )   $ 601  
 
               
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The General Partner has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where (1) if the General Partner defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the General Partner could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the General Partner could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the General Partner’s default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the General Partner ‘s agreements with its derivative counterparties contain provisions where if there is a change in the General Partner’s financial condition that materially changes the General Partner ‘s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the General Partner may be required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The General Partner also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan and financial covenant provisions of the General Partner’s indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would result in the General Partner being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position that were allocated to the Operating Partnership, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $6.2 million. As of June 30, 2010, the General Partner has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the General Partner had breached any of these provisions at June 30, 2010, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $6.2 million.
9. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
General Partnership Units
The General Partner has complete discretion to manage and control the operations and business of the Operating Partnership, which includes but is not limited to the acquisition and disposition of real property, construction of buildings and making capital improvements, and the borrowing of funds from outside lenders or UDR and its subsidiaries to finance such activities. The General Partner can authorize, issue, sell, redeem or purchase any OP unit or securities of the Operating Partnership without the approval of the limited partners. The General Partner can also approve, with regard to the issuances of OP units, the class or one or more series of classes, with designations, preferences, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties including rights, powers and duties senior to limited partnership interests without approval of any limited partners. There were 110,883 OP units of general partnership interest at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of which were held by UDR.
Limited Partnership Units
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were 179,798,525 OP units outstanding, of which 1,751,671 were Class A Limited Partnership units. UDR owned 174,113,691 or 96.8% and 173,811,933 or 96.7% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The remaining 5,684,834 or 3.2% and 5,986,592 or 3.3% OP units outstanding were held by non- affiliated partners at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of which 1,751,671, respectively, were Class A Limited Partnership units.

 

45


 

The limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the OP units held by the limited partner at a redemption price equal to and in the form of the Cash Amount (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement), provided that such OP Units have been outstanding for at least one year. UDR, as general partner of the Operating Partnership may, in its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash Amount or the REIT Share Amount (generally one share of common stock of UDR for each OP Unit), as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement.
The non-affiliated limited partners’ capital is adjusted to redemption value at the end of each reporting period with the corresponding offset against the UDR limited partner capital account based on the redemption rights note above. The aggregate value upon redemption of the then-outstanding OP units held by limited partners was $108.7 million and $98.4 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, based on the value of UDR’s common stock at each period end. Once an OP unit has been redeemed, the redeeming partner has no right to receive any distributions from the Operating Partnership on or after the date of redemption.
Class A Limited Partnership Units
Class A Partnership units have a cumulative annual, non-compounded preferred return, which is equal to 8% based on a value of $16.61 per Class A Limited Partnership unit.
Holders of the Class A Limited Partnership units exclusively possess certain voting rights. The Operating Partnership may not perform the following without approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership units: (i) increase the authorized or issued amount of Class A Partnership units, (ii) reclassify any other partnership interest into Class A Partnership units, (iii) create, authorize or issue any obligations or security convertible into or the right to purchase any Class Partnership units, without the approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership units, (iv) enter into a merger or acquisition, or (v) amend or modify the Operating Partnership Agreement that affects the rights, preferences or privileges of the Class A Partnership units.
Allocation of profits and losses
Profit of the Operating Partnership is allocated in the following order: (i) to the General Partner and the Limited Partners in proportion to and up to the amount of cash distributions made during the year, and (ii) to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage interests. Losses and depreciation and amortization expenses, non-recourse liabilities are allocated to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage interests. Losses allocated to the Limited Partners are capped to the extent that such an allocation would not cause a deficit in the Limited Partners capital account. Such losses are, therefore, allocated to the General Partner. If any Partner’s capital balance were to fall into a deficit any income and gains are allocated to each Partner sufficient to eliminate its negative capital balance.
10. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, comprehensive income/(loss) consisted of unrealized gain/(loss) from derivative financial instruments of ($1.5 million) and ($2.9 million) and $3.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was ($5.8 million) and ($11.5 million) and $5.9 million and $9.2 million, respectively.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
The Operating Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Operating Partnership cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal proceedings and claims at this time. The General Partner believes that such liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

 

46


 

12. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting (formerly SFAS 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”) (“Topic 280”), requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Operating Partnership has the same chief operating decision maker as that of its parent, the General Partner. The chief operating decision maker consists of several members of UDR’s executive management team who use several generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business for our reportable operating segments.
The Operating Partnership owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the United States that generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of apartment homes to a diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures of the Operating Partnership’s apartment communities are rental income and net operating income (“NOI”), and are included in the chief operating decision maker’s assessment of UDR’s performance on a consolidated basis. Rental income represents gross market rent less adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less direct property operating expenses. The chief operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key measure of segment profit or loss.
The Operating Partnership’s two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other communities:
    Same store communities represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to April 1, 2009, and held as of June 30, 2010. A comparison of operating results from the prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves 90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months.
    Non-mature/other communities represent those communities that were acquired or developed in 2008, 2009 or 2010, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties, joint venture properties, properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of mixed use properties.
Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the aggregation criteria of Topic 280 as each of our apartment communities generally has similar economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Operating Partnership’s reportable segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is provided to the chief operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants contributed 10% or more of the Operating Partnership’s total revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

 

47


 

The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” The following table details rental income and NOI for the Operating Partnership’s reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and reconciles NOI to income from continuing and discontinued operations per the consolidated statement of operations (dollars in thousands) :
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Reportable apartment home segment rental income
                               
Same Store Communities
                               
Western Region
  $ 49,839     $ 52,119     $ 99,259     $ 104,367  
Mid-Atlantic Region
    14,863       14,556       29,459       29,121  
Southeastern Region
    10,209       10,317       20,379       20,766  
Southwestern Region
    6,591       6,702       13,165       13,536  
Non-Mature communities/Other
    5,593       5,705       11,033       11,470  
 
                       
 
                               
Total segment and consolidated rental income
  $ 87,095     $ 89,399     $ 173,295     $ 179,260  
 
                       
 
                               
Reportable apartment home segment NOI
                               
Same Store Communities
                               
Western Region
  $ 34,548     $ 37,097     $ 68,478     $ 74,150  
Mid-Atlantic Region
    10,158       10,305       19,984       20,042  
Southeastern Region
    6,415       6,516       12,828       13,184  
Southwestern Region
    4,081       4,059       8,188       8,298  
Non-Mature communities/Other
    4,035       3,979       7,276       7,724  
 
                       
 
                               
Total segment and consolidated NOI
    59,237       61,956       116,754       123,398  
 
                       
 
                               
Reconciling items:
                               
Non-property income
    84       1,999       1,556       5,656  
Property management
    (2,395 )     (2,458 )     (4,766 )     (4,930 )
Other operating expenses
    (1,243 )     (1,225 )     (2,468 )     (2,457 )
Depreciation and amortization
    (41,693 )     (41,437 )     (83,123 )     (83,290 )
Interest
    (12,966 )     (13,560 )     (26,041 )     (25,113 )
General and administrative
    (5,283 )     (3,724 )     (10,655 )     (7,811 )
Other depreciation and amortization
          (91 )           (181 )
Net gain on the sale of real estate
    37       1,367       97       1,416  
Non-controlling interests
    (18 )           (35 )      
 
                       
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders
  $ (4,240 )   $ 2,827     $ (8,681 )   $ 6,688  
 
                       

 

48


 

The following table details the assets of the Operating Partnership’s reportable segments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands) :
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Reportable apartment home segment assets
               
Same Store Communities
               
Western Region
  $ 2,132,392     $ 2,124,693  
Mid-Atlantic Region
    677,772       675,223  
Southeastern Region
    352,290       350,084  
Southwestern Region
    253,383       251,778  
Non-Mature communities/Other
    259,218       239,110  
 
           
 
               
Total segment assets
    3,675,055       3,640,888  
Accumulated depreciation
    (800,852 )     (717,892 )
 
           
 
               
Total segment assets — net book value
    2,874,203       2,922,996  
 
           
 
               
Reconciling items:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
    358       442  
Restricted cash
    7,298       6,865  
Deferred financing costs, net
    8,083       8,727  
Other assets
    18,649       22,037  
 
           
 
               
Total consolidated assets
  $ 2,908,591     $ 2,961,067  
 
           
Capital expenditures related to the Operating Partnership’s same communities totaled $8.1 million and $13.1 million and $8.8 million and $16.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capital expenditures related to the Operating Partnership’s non-mature/other communities totaled $105,000 and $212,000 and $417,000 and $790,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
  i.   Western — Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, Seattle, Sacramento, Inland Empire, Portland, and San Diego
 
  ii.   Mid-Atlantic — Metropolitan DC and Baltimore
 
  iii.   Southeastern — Nashville, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Other Florida
 
  iv.   Southwestern — Dallas and Phoenix
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding securities of the General Partner (“the “Guarantees”). The Guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder of the applicable securities and to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture whether for principal of or interest on the securities, (and premium if any) and all other monetary obligations of UDR under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities and (b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities.

 

49

EXHIBIT 99.4
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and dispositions, development activity and capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent growth, occupancy, and rental expense growth. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, unanticipated adverse business developments affecting us, or our properties, adverse changes in the real estate markets and general and local economies and business conditions. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements included in this Report may not prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Business Overview
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership” or “UDR, L.P.”), is a Delaware limited partnership formed in February 2004 and organized pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (as amended from time to time, or any successor to such statute, the “Act”). The Operating Partnership is the successor-in-interest to United Dominion Realty, L.P., a limited partnership formed under the laws of Virginia, which commenced operations on November 4, 1995. Our sole general partner is UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“UDR” or the “General Partner”), which conducts a substantial amount of its business and holds a substantial amount of its assets through the Operating Partnership. At June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership’s real estate portfolio included 81 communities located in 8 states plus the District of Columbia, with a total of 23,351 apartment homes.
As of June 30, 2010, UDR owned 110,883 units of our general limited partnership interests and 174,113,691 units of our limited partnership interests (the “OP Units”), or approximately 96.8% of our outstanding OP Units. By virtue of its ownership of our OP Units and being our sole general partner, UDR has the ability to control all of the day-to-day operations of the Operating Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this Report to the Operating Partnership or “we,” “us” or “our” refer to UDR, L.P. together with its consolidated subsidiaries. We refer to our General Partner together with its consolidated subsidiaries (including us) and the General Partner’s consolidated joint ventures as “UDR” or the “General Partner.”
UDR operates as a self administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes. UDR focuses on owning, acquiring, renovating, developing, and managing apartment communities nationwide. The General Partner was formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation and changed its state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland in June 2003. At June 30, 2010, the General Partner’s consolidated real estate portfolio included 168 communities located in 10 states and the District of Columbia, with a total of 46,932 apartment homes, and its total real estate portfolio, inclusive of its unconsolidated communities, included an additional 11 communities with 4,143 apartment homes.
Special Dividend
On November 5, 2008, UDR’s Board of Directors declared a dividend on a pre-adjusted basis of $1.29 per share (“the Special Dividend”). The Special Dividend was paid on January 29, 2009 to UDR’s stockholders of record on December 9, 2008, which also includes the Operating Partnership’s unit holders. The dividend represented UDR’s fourth quarter recurring distribution of $0.33 per share and an additional special distribution of $0.96 per share due to taxable income arising from our dispositions occurring during the year. Subject to the General Partner’s right to pay the entire Special Dividend in cash, its stockholders had the option to make an election to receive payment in cash or in shares, however, the aggregate amount of cash payable to stockholders, other than cash payable in lieu of fractional shares, would not be less than $44.0 million.

 

 


 

The Special Dividend, totaling $177.1 million, was paid on 137,266,557 shares issued and outstanding of UDR’s stock on the record date. Approximately $133.1 million of the Special Dividend was paid through the issuance of 11,358,042 shares of common stock, which was determined based on the volume weighted average closing sales price of UDR’s common stock of $11.71 per share on the NYSE on January 21, 2009 and January 22, 2009. The Operating Partnership issued an additional 13,746,221 OP units in January 2009 in connection with the Special Dividend.
The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of June 30, 2010.
                                                                 
                                    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    As of June 30, 2010     June 30, 2010     June 30, 2010 (a)  
                    Percentage     Total                          
    Number of     Number of     of Total     Carrying     Average     Total Income     Average     Total Income  
    Apartment     Apartment     Carrying     Value     Physical     per Occupied     Physical     per Occupied  
Same Communities   Communities     Homes     Value     (in thousands)     Occupancy     Home (b)     Occupancy     Home (b)  
 
                                                               
Western Region
                                                               
Orange Co, CA
    12       4,124       20.8 %   $ 763,069       95.7 %   $ 1,475       95.6 %   $ 1,473  
San Francisco, CA
    8       1,703       10.6 %     391,283       97.3 %     1,892       96.8 %     1,889  
Monterey Peninsula, CA
    7       1,565       4.1 %     151,777       95.1 %     1,063       94.3 %     1,054  
Los Angeles, CA
    6       1,222       7.2 %     264,540       96.1 %     1,545       96.4 %     1,541  
San Diego, CA
    3       689       2.7 %     99,326       95.9 %     1,258       95.4 %     1,250  
Seattle, WA
    5       932       5.6 %     206,397       97.0 %     1,187       97.0 %     1,180  
Inland Empire, CA
    2       834       3.2 %     118,987       94.9 %     1,244       95.1 %     1,238  
Sacramento, CA
    2       914       1.8 %     67,721       92.5 %     863       93.4 %     868  
Portland, OR
    3       716       1.9 %     69,292       95.8 %     936       95.6 %     936  
 
                                                               
Mid-Atlantic Region
                                                               
Metropolitan DC
    7       2,347       14.5 %     532,831       96.4 %     1,634       96.2 %     1,621  
Baltimore, MD
    5       994       3.9 %     144,941       97.0 %     1,305       97.0 %     1,297  
 
                                                               
Southeastern Region
                                                               
Tampa, FL
    3       1,154       2.9 %     108,321       96.0 %     999       95.7 %     997  
Nashville, TN
    6       1,612       3.5 %     125,876       97.1 %     824       96.6 %     820  
Jacksonville, FL
    1       400       1.2 %     42,136       94.8 %     831       95.4 %     842  
Other Florida
    1       636       2.1 %     75,957       95.4 %     1,139       95.9 %     1,143  
 
                                                               
Southwestern Region
                                                               
Dallas, TX
    2       1,348       5.0 %     182,053       95.4 %     1,131       95.6 %     1,128  
Phoenix, AZ
    3       914       1.9 %     71,330       95.7 %     850       95.5 %     848  
 
                                               
Total/Average Same Communities
    76       22,104       92.9 %     3,415,837       95.9 %   $ 1,282       95.8 %   $ 1,277  
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Non Matures, Commercial Properties & Other
    5       1,247       7.1 %     259,218                                  
 
                                                       
Total Real Estate Held for Investment
    81       23,351       100.0 %     3,675,055                                  
 
                                                       
 
                                                               
Total Accumulated Depreciation
                            (800,852 )                                
 
                                                             
 
                                                               
Total Real Estate Owned, Net of Accumulated Depreciation
                          $ 2,874,203                                  
 
                                                             
     
(a)   There was no change in the Same Community population for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
 
(b)   Total Income per Occupied Home represents total monthly revenues per weighted average number of apartment homes occupied.

 

2


 

The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of December 31, 2009.
                                                                 
                                                            Average  
    Number of     Number of     Percentage of     Carrying                     Average     Home Size  
    Apartment     Apartment     Carrying     Value     Encumbrances     Cost per     Physical     (in Square  
    Communities     Homes     Value     (in thousands)     (in thousands)     Home     Occupancy     Feet)  
WESTERN REGION
                                                               
Orange County, CA
    12       4,124       20.9 %   $ 761,297     $ 327,274     $ 184,602       95.2 %     820  
San Francisco, CA
    10       2,315       14.2 %     517,731       101,167       223,642       92.8 %     806  
Los Angeles, CA
    6       1,222       7.2 %     263,664       65,814       215,764       95.1 %     967  
Seattle, WA
    5       932       5.7 %     205,759       38,387       220,771       95.1 %     865  
Monterey Peninsula, CA
    7       1,565       4.1 %     150,928             96,440       94.6 %     724  
Inland Empire, CA
    2       834       3.3 %     118,709       53,773       142,337       94.7 %     882  
San Diego, CA
    3       689       2.7 %     98,641       21,996       143,165       95.4 %     788  
Portland, OR
    3       716       1.9 %     68,711       46,933       95,965       95.8 %     918  
Sacramento, CA
    2       914       1.9 %     67,384       48,563       73,724       93.4 %     820  
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
                                                               
Metropolitan DC
    8       2,565       15.7 %     570,358       134,023       222,362       95.4 %     948  
Baltimore, MD
    5       994       4.0 %     144,059       82,818       144,929       87.5 %     971  
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
                                                               
Nashville, TN
    6       1,612       3.4 %     125,023       20,204       77,558       95.5 %     925  
Tampa, FL
    3       1,154       3.0 %     107,438       10,185       93,101       95.7 %     1,029  
Other Florida
    1       636       2.1 %     75,656       40,133       118,956       95.2 %     1,130  
Jacksonville, FL
    1       400       1.2 %     41,968             104,920       93.6 %     964  
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
                                                               
Dallas, TX
    2       1,348       5.0 %     181,271       95,265       134,474       95.1 %     909  
Phoenix, AZ
    3       914       1.9 %     70,507       35,663       77,141       94.9 %     1,000  
Austin, TX
    1       250       0.7 %     27,287             109,148       93.7 %     883  
Other Texas
    1       167       0.3 %     13,096             78,419       0.0 %     710  
 
                                               
Total Operating Communities
    81       23,351       99.2 %     3,609,487       1,122,198       154,575       93.9 %     887  
Land and other
                  0.8 %     31,401                                
 
                                                     
Total Real Estate Owned
    81       23,351       100.0 %   $ 3,640,888     $ 1,122,198                          
 
                                                     
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through operating cash flows, the sale of properties, and the issuance of debt. Both the coordination of asset and liability maturities and effective capital management are important to the maintenance of liquidity. The Operating Partnership’s primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations as determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and operating expenses related to our portfolio of apartment homes and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partner’s credit agreements. The General Partner will routinely use its unsecured credit facility to temporarily fund certain investing and financing activities prior to arranging for longer-term financing or the issuance of equity or debt securities. During the past several years, proceeds from the sale of real estate have been used for both investing and financing activities as we repositioned our portfolio.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by operations and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partner’s credit agreements. We expect to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such as scheduled debt maturities and potential property acquisitions through borrowings and the disposition of properties. We believe that our net cash provided by operations and borrowings will continue to be adequate to meet both operating requirements and the payment of distributions. Likewise, the budgeted expenditures for improvements and renovations of certain properties are expected to be funded from property operations and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partner’s credit agreements the Operating Partnership is a party to.
Future Capital Needs
Future capital expenditures are expected to be funded with proceeds from the issuance of secured debt, the sale of properties, the borrowings allocated to us under our General Partner’s credit agreements, and to a lesser extent, with cash flows provided by operating activities. Acquisition activity in strategic markets is expected to be largely financed by the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of properties, the issuance of OP units and the assumption or placement of secured debt.
During the remainder of 2010, we have approximately $1.4 million of secured debt maturing and we anticipate that we will repay that debt with operating cash flows, proceeds from borrowings allocated to us under our General Partner’s credit agreements, or by exercising extension rights on such secured debt, as applicable. The repayment of debt will be recorded as an offset to the “Receivable due from General Partner”.

 

3


 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to our financial condition and results of operations and that involves some degree of uncertainty. Estimates are prepared based on management’s assessment after considering all evidence available. Changes in estimates could affect our financial position or results of operations. Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that we consider critical to understanding our financial condition or results of operations where there is uncertainty or where significant judgment is required.
Capital Expenditures
In conformity with GAAP, we capitalize those expenditures that materially enhance the value of an existing asset or substantially extend the useful life of an existing asset. Expenditures necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as incurred.
During the six month ended June 30, 2010, $28.2 million was spent on capital expenditures for all of our communities as compared to $32.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. During 2009, $70.4 million was spent on capital expenditures for all of our communities as compared to $84.3 million in 2008 and $92.2 million in 2007. These capital improvements included turnover-related capital expenditures, revenue enhancing capital expenditures, asset preservation expenditures, kitchen and bath upgrades, other extensive interior/exterior upgrades and major renovations.
We will continue to selectively add revenue enhancing improvements which we believe will provide a return on investment substantially in excess of our cost of capital.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less than the net book value of those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair market value. Our estimates of fair market value represent our best estimate based upon industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.
Real Estate Investment Properties
We purchase real estate investment properties from time to time and allocate the purchase price to various components, such as land, buildings, and intangibles related to in-place leases in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (formerly SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations”). The purchase price is allocated based on the relative fair value of each component. The fair value of buildings is determined as if the buildings were vacant upon acquisition and subsequently leased at market rental rates. As such, the determination of fair value considers the present value of all cash flows expected to be generated from the property including an initial lease-up period. We determine the fair value of in-place leases by assessing the net effective rent and remaining term of the lease relative to market terms for similar leases at acquisition. In addition, we consider the cost of acquiring similar leases, the foregone rents associated with the lease-up period, and the carrying costs associated with the lease-up period. The fair value of in-place leases is recorded and amortized as amortization expense over the remaining contractual lease period.
Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities, and net cash used in investing activities and financing activities that are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash flow provided by operating activities was $77.2 million compared to $69.8 million for the comparable period in 2009. The increase in net cash flow from operating activities is primarily due to the changes in operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by a decrease in property net operating income from our apartment community portfolio, a decrease in interest income related to a $200 million note receivable that was paid off during 2009 and higher interest expense.

 

4


 

Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash used in investing activities was $28.2 million compared to $32.2 million for the comparable period in 2009. The decrease is due to a reduction in capital expenditures.
Acquisitions
The Operating Partnership did not acquire any communities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 or during 2009. The Operating Partnership’s long-term strategic plan is to achieve greater operating efficiencies by investing in fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been seeking to expand our interests in communities located in California, Metropolitan Washington D.C. and the Washington State markets over the past years. Prospectively, we plan to continue to channel new investments into those markets we believe will continue to provide the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted based upon defined criteria including favorable job formation, low single-family home affordability and favorable demand/supply ratio for multifamily housing.
Dispositions
The Operating Partnership did not dispose of any communities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 or 2009.
Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net cash used in financing activities was $49.1 million compared to $37.3 million for the comparable period of 2009. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to a decrease in the proceeds from secured debt, partially offset by a net decrease in payments to the General Partner and a decrease in payments on secured debt.
Credit Facilities
As of June 30, 2010, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General Partner’s option. At June 30, 2010, $948.6 million of the funded balance was fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a weighted average variable rate of 1.8%. At June 30, 2010, $761.8 million of these credit facilities are allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partner’s unsecured credit facility, with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $133.9 million and $189.3 million, respectively.
The credit facilities are subject to customary financial covenants and limitations.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing debt that has to be refinanced. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, but rather issue these financial instruments to finance our portfolio of real estate assets. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Our earnings are affected as changes in short-term interest rates impact our cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed rate debt. We had $301.9 million in variable rate debt that is not subject to interest rate swap contracts as of June 30, 2010. If market interest rates for variable rate debt increased by 100 basis points, our interest expense would increase by $3.0 million based on the balance at June 30, 2010.
These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the adjusted level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.

 

5


 

A presentation of cash flow metrics based on GAAP is as follows ( dollars in thousands ):
                 
    Six Months Ended,  
    June 30,  
    2010     2009  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 77,240     $ 69,839  
Net cash used by investing activities
    (28,248 )     (32,290 )
Net cash used in financing activities
    (49,076 )     (37,266 )
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities and investing activities, and net cash used in financing activities that are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Operating Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash flow provided by operating activities was $157.3 million compared to $168.7 million for 2008. The decrease in net cash flow from operating activities is primarily due to a decrease in property net operating income from our apartment community portfolio, a decrease in interest income related to a $200 million note receivable that was paid off during 2009 and higher interest expense, partially offset by a decrease in other operating liabilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, our net cash flow provided by operating activities was $168.7 million compared to $212.7 million for 2007. During 2008, the decrease in cash flow from operating activities resulted primarily from a reduction in property net operating income from our apartment community portfolio. The reduction in property net operating income was driven by the sale of a significant component of our portfolio in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was partially offset by higher interest income during 2008 due to a $200 million note receivable issued in conjunction with the dispositions.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by investing activities was $129.6 million compared to $82.0 million for 2008. The increase in cash is primarily driven by the proceeds from a $200 million note receivable in 2009 and a reduction in acquisition activity and capital expenditures in 2009 as compared to 2008. This is partially offset by the proceeds from dispositions of $880 million in 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash provided by investing activities was $82.0 million compared to $75.1 million for 2007. The increase in cash is primarily due to acquisition and disposition activity and capital expenditures, all of which are discussed in further detail throughout this Report.
Acquisitions
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had no property acquisitions. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired nine apartment communities with 3,348 apartment homes for aggregate consideration of $713.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we acquired four apartment communities with 943 apartment homes for aggregate consideration of $236.9 million. The Operating Partnership’s long-term strategic plan is to achieve greater operating efficiencies by investing in fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been expanding our interests in communities located in California, Florida, Metropolitan Washington D.C. and the Washington State markets over the past years. Prospectively, we plan to continue to channel new investments into those markets we believe will continue to provide the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted based upon defined criteria including favorable job formation, low single-family home affordability and favorable demand/supply ratio for multifamily housing.

 

6


 

Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not dispose of any communities. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold 55 communities with a total of 16,960 apartment homes, for net proceeds of $880.0 million. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $475.2 million on these sales. Proceeds from the sales were used primarily to acquire new communities, reduce debt, and advance funds to our General Partner.
In conjunction with this transaction, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership received a note in the amount of $200.0 million. The note was paid in full during the year ended December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Operating Partnership sold 12 communities with a total of 4,461 apartment homes and a parcel of land for net proceeds of $404.2 million. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $143.4 million on these sales. Proceeds from the sales were used primarily to reduce debt and advance funds to our General Partner.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash used in financing activities was $290.1 million compared to $247.2 million for the comparable period of 2008. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to a net increase in payments to the General Partner, which was partially offset by the net activity on secured debt.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, our net cash used in financing activities was $247.2 million compared to $287.8 million for the comparable period of 2007. The decrease in financing activities was primarily due to increased borrowings on secured debt in 2008 partially offset by the increased payments to the General Partner and increased payments on secured debt in 2008.
Credit Facilities
As of December 31, 2009, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General Partner’s option. There is $950.0 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a weighted average variable rate of 1.7%. $750.4 million of these credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2009 based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
As of December 31, 2008, the General Partner had secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.0 billion with $831.2 million outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General Partner’s option. There was $666.6 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.5% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a weighted average variable rate of 3.1%. Approximately $484.8 million of these credit facilities were allocated to the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2008 based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt.
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partner’s unsecured credit facility, with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, and a $100 million term loan. At December 31, 2009, the balance under the unsecured credit facility was $189.3 million.
The credit facilities are subject to customary financial covenants and limitations.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing debt that has to be refinanced. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, but rather issue these financial instruments to finance our portfolio of real estate assets. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Our earnings are affected as changes in short-term interest rates impact our cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed rate debt. We had $290.6 million in variable rate debt that is not subject to interest rate swap contracts as of December 31, 2009. If market interest rates for variable rate debt increased by 100 basis points, our interest expense would increase by $2.9 million based on the balance at December 31, 2009.

 

7


 

These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the adjusted level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.
A presentation of cash flow metrics based on GAAP is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                         
    For the year ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 157,333     $ 168,660     $ 212,727  
Net cash provided by investing activities
    129,628       81,993       75,069  
Net cash used in financing activities
    (290,109 )     (247,150 )     (287,847 )
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The following discussion explains the changes in results of operations that are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations for the periods presented.
Net (Loss)/Income Attributable to OP Unit holders
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders was ($4.2) million (($0.02) per OP unit) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to net income attributable to OP unit holders of $2.8 million ($0.02 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net income attributable to OP unit holders for the three months ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
    a decrease in net operating income;
    a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income and increase in losses due to changes in the fair value of derivatives;
    a reduction in disposition gains in 2010 as compared to 2009. The Company recognized net gains of $37,000 and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively; and
    an increase in general and administrative expenses allocated to us by our General Partner.
These changes were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in the interest rate on the note payable to the General Partner.
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders was ($8.7) million (($0.05) per OP unit) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to net income attributable to OP unit holders of $6.7 million ($0.04 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net income attributable to OP unit holders for the six months ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
    a decrease in net operating income;
    a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income and increase in losses due to changes in the fair value of derivatives;
    an increase in interest expense incurred on new debt;

 

8


 

    a reduction in disposition gains in 2010 as compared to 2009. The Company recognized net gains of $97,000 and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively; and
    an increase in general and administrative expenses allocated to us by our General Partner.
These changes were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in the interest rate on the note payable to the General Partner.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
The following discussion explains the changes in results of operations that are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, and includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations for the periods presented.
Net (Loss)/Income Attributable to OP Unit holders
2009 -vs-2008
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unit holders was ($4.2) million (($0.02) per OP unit) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to net income attributable to OP unit holders of $497.7 million ($3.00 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net income attributable to OP unit holders for the year ended December 31, 2009 resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
    a reduction in disposition gains in 2009 as compared to 2008. The Company recognized net gains of $1.5 million and $475.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively;
    a decrease in net operating income due to the disposition of properties in 2008;
    an increase in interest expense incurred on new debt;
    an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the acquisition of operating properties in 2008; and
    a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income.
2008 -vs-2007
Net income attributable to OP unit holders was $497.7 million ($3.00 per OP unit) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $193.7 million ($1.17 per OP unit) for the comparable period in the prior year. The increase in net income attributable to OP unit holders for the year ended December 31, 2008 resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
    an increase of $331.8 million in the gains on the disposition of our property inclusive of gains on sale to a joint venture; and
    an increase of $13.0 million related to interest income generated by the Operating Partnership;
These increases were partially offset by:
    a decrease in net operating income due to the disposition of properties in 2007 and 2008;
    an increase in interest expense incurred on new debt; and
    an increase in depreciation expense.

 

9


 

Apartment Community Operations
Our net income is primarily generated from the operation of our apartment communities.
The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio for the three months and six months ended June 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands) :
                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     Year Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     % Change     2010     2009     % Change  
 
Property rental income
  $ 87,095     $ 89,399       -2.6 %   $ 173,295     $ 179,260       -3.3 %
Property operating expense (a)
    (27,858 )     (27,443 )     1.5 %     (56,541 )     (55,862 )     1.2 %
 
                                   
Property net operating income (“NOI”)
  $ 59,237     $ 61,956       -4.4 %   $ 116,754     $ 123,398       -5.4 %
 
                                   
     
(a)   Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses.
The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net income attributable to OP unit holders as reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the the three months and six months ended June 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands) :
                                 
    Three Months Ended,     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Property net operating income
  $ 59,237     $ 61,956     $ 116,754     $ 123,398  
Other income
    84       1,999       1,556       5,656  
Real estate depreciation and amortization
    (41,693 )     (41,437 )     (83,123 )     (83,290 )
Interest expense
    (12,966 )     (13,560 )     (26,041 )     (25,113 )
General and administrative and property management
    (7,678 )     (6,182 )     (15,421 )     (12,741 )
Other depreciation and amortization
          (91 )           (181 )
Other operating expenses
    (1,243 )     (1,225 )     (2,468 )     (2,457 )
Net gain on sale of real estate
    37       1,367       97       1,416  
Non-controlling interests
    (18 )           (35 )      
 
                       
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (4,240 )   $ 2,827     $ (8,681 )   $ 6,688  
 
                       
The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands) :
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31,     Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     % Change     2008     2007     % Change  
 
                                               
Property rental income
  $ 353,056     $ 362,012       -2.5 %   $ 362,012     $ 445,198       -18.7 %
Property operating expense (a)
    (112,488 )     (115,972 )     -3.0 %     (115,972 )     (151,147 )     -23.3 %
 
                                   
Property net operating income (“NOI”)
  $ 240,568     $ 246,040       -2.2 %   $ 246,040     $ 294,051       -16.3 %
 
                                   
     
(a)   Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses.

 

10


 

The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net income attributable to OP unit holders as reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands) :
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
                       
Property net operating income
  $ 240,568     $ 246,040     $ 294,051  
Other income
    5,695       13,106       150  
Real estate depreciation and amortization
    (166,773 )     (154,584 )     (158,533 )
Interest expense
    (53,547 )     (47,139 )     (47,367 )
General and administrative and property management
    (26,595 )     (29,037 )     (35,276 )
Other depreciation and amortization
          (327 )     (329 )
Other operating expenses
    (4,868 )     (4,400 )     (1,675 )
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property to a joint venture
                98,433  
Net gain on sale of real estate
    1,475       475,249       44,976  
Non-controlling interests
    (131 )     (1,188 )     (742 )
 
                 
Net (loss)/income attributable to OP unitholders
  $ (4,176 )   $ 497,720     $ 193,688  
 
                 
Same Store Communities
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs. Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to April 1, 2009 and held on June 30, 2010) consisted of 22,104 apartment homes and provided 93.2% of our total NOI for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
NOI for our same store community properties decreased 4.8% or $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in property NOI was primarily attributable to a 2.6% or $2.2 million decrease in property rental income and by a 2.3% or $586,000 increase in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by a 4.0% or $3.3 million decrease in rental rates which was partially offset by a 46.7% or $286,000 decrease in bad debt, a 10.1% or $327,000 decrease in vacancy loss, and a 13.4% or $464,000 increase in reimbursement income. Physical occupancy increased 0.5% to 95.9% and total income per occupied home decreased $41 to $1,282 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 3.0% or $258,000 increase in real estate taxes and a 3.8% or $237,000 increase in personnel costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income) was 67.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 69.3% for the comparable period in 2009.
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2009 and held on June 30, 2010) consisted of 22,104 apartment homes and provided 93.8% of our total NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
NOI for our same store community properties decreased 5.4% or $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in property NOI was primarily attributable to a 3.3% or $5.5 million decrease in property rental income and a 1.3% or $671,000 increase in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by a 4.9% or $8.0 million decrease in rental rates partially offset by a 40.8% or $485,000 decrease in bad debt, a 19.6% or $1.4 million decrease in vacancy loss and a 12.5% or $857,000 increase in reimbursement income. Physical occupancy increased 0.8% to 95.8% and total income per occupied home decreased $55 to $1,277 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 3.7% or $285,000 increase in repairs and maintenance and a 3.2% or $397,000 increase in personnel costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income) was 67.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 68.9% for the comparable period in 2009.

 

11


 

2009-vs.-2008
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2008 and held on December 31, 2009) consisted of 17,332 apartment homes and provided 72% of our total NOI for the year ended December 31, 2009.
NOI for our same store community properties decreased 2.5% or $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in property NOI was primarily attributable to a 2.4% or $6.2 million decrease in property rental income, which was partially offset by a 2.3% or $1.8 million decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by a 3.1% or $7.7 million decrease in rental rates and a 52.1% or $573,000 increase in bad debt which was offset by an 13.7% or $1.6 million decrease in vacancy loss and a 7.3% or $739,000 increase in reimbursement income. Physical occupancy increased 0.3% to 95.3% and total income per occupied home decreased $23 to $1,266.
The decrease in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 6.0% or $223,000 decrease in insurance, a 2.1% or $249,000 decrease in utilities, a 5.5% or $706,000 decrease in repairs and maintenance, a 38.3% or $298,000 decrease in incentive bonuses, and a 6.6% or $365,000 decrease in administrative and marketing costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income) was 69.3% during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
2008-vs.-2007
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2007 and held on December 31, 2008) consisted of 17,505 apartment homes and provided 72% of our property NOI for the year ended December 31, 2008.
NOI for our same store community properties increased 4.8% or $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in property NOI was primarily attributable to a 4.1% or $10.2 million increase in rental revenues and other income partially offset by a 2.7% or $2.1 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues was primarily driven by a 2.1% or $5.1 million increase in rental rates, a 16.2% or $1.5 million increase in reimbursement income, a 6.9% or $866,000 decrease in vacancy loss, and a 77.6% or $2.5 million decrease in rental concessions. Physical occupancy increased 0.3% to 95.0% and total income per occupied home increased $53 to $1,289.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 5.6% or $1.3 million increase in real estate taxes due to higher assessed values on our communities and favorable tax appeals in 2007, a 4.9% or $893,000 increase in personnel costs, and a 2.4% or $279,000 increase in utilities partially offset by a 4.6% or $267,000 decrease in administrative and marketing costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income) increased to 69.2% as compared to 68.7% in the comparable period in the prior year.
Non-Mature/Other Communities
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The remaining $4.0 million or 6.8% and $7.3 million or 6.2% of our total NOI during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, was generated from communities that we classify as “non-mature communities.” The Operating Partnership’s non-mature communities consist of communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in same store communities, which includes communities developed or acquired, redevelopment properties, sold properties, non-apartment components of mixed use properties, properties classified as real estate held for disposition and condominium properties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, a significant portion of our NOI from non-mature communities was recognized from our redevelopment properties and amounted to $2.7 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
2009-vs.-2008
The remaining $66.8 million and $67.8 million of our NOI during the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was generated from communities that we classify as “non-mature communities.” Our non-mature communities consist of communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in same store communities, which includes communities developed or acquired, redevelopment properties, sold properties and properties classified as real estate held for disposition. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized NOI for our acquired communities of $49.3 million and redevelopments of $11.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized NOI for our acquired communities of $35.5 million, sold communities of $15.2 million, and redeveloped properties of $11.8 million.

 

12


 

2008-vs.-2007
The remaining $68.1 million and $124.3 million of our NOI during the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was generated from communities that we classify as “non-mature communities.” For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized NOI for our developments of $5.0 million, acquired communities of $35.6 million, redeveloped properties of $6.9 million, and sold properties of $15.2 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized net operating income for our developments of $4.6 million, acquired communities of $2.6 million, redeveloped properties of $6.7 million, and sold properties of $92.1 million. In addition, in 2007 the Company sold a portfolio of properties into a joint venture that the General Partner continued to manage after the transaction and as such is not deemed discontinued operations. The NOI from those communities was $15.6 million.
Other Income
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, other income primarily includes a recovery from real estate tax accruals partially offset by losses due to the change in the fair value of derivatives. Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes interest income on a note receivable for $200 million that a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership received related to the disposition of 55 properties during 2008. In May 2009, the $200 million note was paid in full.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, other income primarily includes interest income on a note for $200 million that a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership received related to the disposition of 55 properties during 2008. In May 2009, the $200 million note was paid in full.
Other Operating Expenses
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the increases in other operating expenses are primarily due to additional costs incurred by the Operating Partnership related to long-term ground leases associated with properties acquired in December 2007 and July 2008. A schedule of future obligations related to ground leases is set forth under “Contractual Obligations” below.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, real estate depreciation and amortization did not change significantly as the Operating Partnership did not have any acquisitions or dispositions during these respective periods.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, real estate depreciation and amortization increased 7.9% or $12.2 million as compared to the comparable period in 2008. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2009 is primarily the result of the acquisition of nine communities with 3,348 apartment homes during 2008, and additional capital expenditures. As part of the Operating Partnership’s acquisition activity a portion of the purchase price is allocated to intangible assets and are typically amortized over a period of less than one year.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, real estate depreciation and amortization on both continuing and discontinued operations decreased 2.5% or $3.9 million as compared to the comparable period in 2007. The decrease in depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2008 is a result of the repositioning efforts that included the sale of 55 operating communities. As the properties sold in 2008 did not meet the criteria to be deemed as held-for-sale the communities until late in the fourth quarter of 2007, we did not cease depreciation until that time. With the proceeds from the sale, the Operating Partnership purchased $801.9 million of properties. As part of our allocation of fair value associated with the purchase price, we attributed $5.7 million to in-place leases for the 2008 acquisitions, which are generally amortized over an 11 month period.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, interest expense decreased 4.4% or $594,000 as compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease is primarily due a decrease in the interest rate charged on the note payable due to the General Partner partially offset by additional borrowings on secured credit facilities. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 interest expense increased 3.7% or $928,000 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily due to additional borrowings on secured credit facilities partially offset by a decrease in the interest rate charged on the note payable due to the General Partner.

 

13


 

For the year ended December 31, 2009, interest expense on both continuing and discontinued operations increased 13.6% or $6.4 million as compared to 2008. This increase is primarily due to additional borrowings on FNMA credit facilities offset by debt repayments and maturities.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, interest expense on both continuing and discontinued operations slightly decreased 0.5% or $228,000 as compared to 2007. This decrease is primarily due to repayments of fixed rate secured debt funded by the proceeds of 2007 and 2008 sales of real estate, which was partially offset by additional borrowings, and an increase in the note payable due to the General Partner.
General and Administrative
The Operating Partnership is charged directly for general and administrative expenses it incurs. The Operating Partnership is also charged for other general and administrative expenses that have been allocated by UDR to each of its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership, based on each subsidiary’s pro-rata portion of UDR’s total apartment homes.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, general and administrative expenses increased 41.9% or $1.6 million and 36.4% or $2.8 million, respectively, as compared to the comparable period in 2009. The increases were due to a number of factors, none of which are significant.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, general and administrative expenses decreased 11.5% or $2.2 million as compared to 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a number of factors including the write off of acquisition-related costs and severance and restructuring costs recognized in 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative expenses decreased 17.2% or $4.0 million as compared to 2007. The decrease is due to a number of factors including severance costs and other restructuring charges relating to workforce reductions, relocation costs and other related costs recognized in 2007.
Gain on the Sale of Depreciable Property
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $37,000 and $97,000 and $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our divestiture activity from period to period as well as the extent of gains related to specific properties sold.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $1.5 million, $475.2 million, and $143.4 million, respectively. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our divestiture activity from period to period as well as the extent of gains related to specific properties sold.
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results through wage pressures, utilities and material costs, substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less, which generally enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by increasing rents on our apartment homes. Although an extreme escalation in energy and food costs could have a negative impact on our residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we do not believe this has had a material impact on our results for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 or on our results for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material.

 

14


 

Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations   2010     2011-2012     2013-2014     Thereafter     Total  
 
                                       
Long-term debt obligations
  $ 2,584     $ 337,846     $ 125,980     $ 655,788     $ 1,122,198  
Interest on debt obligations
    53,237       91,273       62,562       123,062       330,134  
Operating lease obligations- Ground leases (a)
    4,445       8,890       8,890       295,102       317,327  
 
                             
 
                                       
 
  $ 60,266     $ 438,009     $ 197,432     $ 1,073,952     $ 1,769,659  
 
                             
     
(a)   For purposes of our ground lease contracts, the Operating Partnership uses the minimum lease payment, if stated in the agreement. For ground lease agreements where there is a reset provision based on the communities appraised value or consumer price index but does not included a specified minimum lease payment, the Operating Partnership uses the current rent over the remainder of the lease term.
During 2009, we incurred gross interest costs of $49.0 million on secured debt, of which $444,000 was capitalized.
Factors Affecting Our Business and Prospects
There are many factors that affect our business and the results of our operations, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
    general economic factors;
 
    unfavorable changes in apartment market and economic conditions that could adversely affect occupancy levels and rental rates;
 
    the failure of acquisitions to achieve anticipated results;
 
    possible difficulty in selling apartment communities;
 
    competitive factors that may limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase or maintain rents;
 
    insufficient cash flow that could affect our debt financing and create refinancing risk;
 
    failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could impair our debt service payments and distributions to stockholders;
 
    redevelopment and construction risks that may impact our profitability;
 
    potential damage from natural disasters, including hurricanes and other weather-related events, which could result in substantial costs to us;
 
    risks from extraordinary losses for which we may not have insurance or adequate reserves;
 
    uninsured losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insurance retention, uninsured claims or casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage;
 
    changing interest rates, which could increase interest costs;
 
    potential liability for environmental contamination, which could result in substantial costs to us;
 
    the imposition of federal taxes if the General Partner fails to qualify as a REIT under the Code in any taxable year;
 
    our internal control over financial reporting may not be considered effective which could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports, and in turn have an adverse effect on our ability to issue OP units; and
 
    changes in real estate laws, tax laws and other laws affecting our business.

 

15