Table of Contents



FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

or

     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-6402-1


SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
     
Texas   74-1488375
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I. R. S. employer identification
incorporation or organization)   number)
     
1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas   77019
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)

713-522-5141
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     
YES  X 
  NO       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 12b-2).

     
YES   X  
  NO       

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of November 1, 2004 was 330,339,308 (net of treasury shares).



1


SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX

         
    Page
       
       
    3  
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
       
    4  
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
       
    5  
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
       
    6  
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
       
    7-34  
       
    34  
    34-35  
    35-37  
    37-40  
    40-46  
    46-49  
    49-56  
    56-57  
    57-58  
    58-60  
       
    60  
    60  
    60  
    60-61  
    62  
  Form of Indemnification Agreement
  First Amendment to Retirement Savings Plan
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  Certification of CEO - Section 302
  Certification of CFO - Section 302
  Certification of CEO - Section 906
  Certification of CFO - Section 906

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
            (Restated)           (Restated)
            note 17           note 17
Revenues
  $ 403,352     $ 566,461     $ 1,421,526     $ 1,729,337  
Costs and expenses
    335,083       497,515       1,166,776       1,450,801  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Gross profit
    68,269       68,946       254,750       278,536  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
General and administrative expenses
    (25,298 )     (52,775 )     (100,347 )     (110,454 )
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
    (3,281 )     (1,452 )     33,018       5,413  
Other operating income (expense)
                6,932       (1,724 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income
    39,690       14,719       194,353       171,771  
Interest expense
    (27,888 )     (34,835 )     (94,668 )     (107,968 )
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt
          176       (16,770 )     2,079  
Other income, net
    4,569       11,218       12,758       16,590  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    (23,319 )     (23,441 )     (98,680 )     (89,299 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes
    16,371       (8,722 )     95,673       82,472  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    4,079       (3,331 )     (4,468 )     29,815  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effects of accounting changes
  $ 12,292     $ (5,391 )   $ 100,141     $ 52,657  
Income from discontinued operations (net of income tax expense (benefit) of $141, $112, ($48,815) and $336, respectively)
    284       659       35,375       2,005  
Cumulative effects of accounting changes (net of income tax benefit of $21,274)
                (48,061 )      
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 12,576     $ (4,732 )   $ 87,455     $ 54,662  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effects of accounting changes
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .32     $ .18  
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
                .11        
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax
                (.15 )      
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .28     $ .18  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effects of accounting changes
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .31     $ .18  
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
                .10        
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax
                (.14 )      
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .27     $ .18  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Basic weighted average number of shares
    336,590       300,507       315,656       299,221  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted weighted average number of shares
    340,215       300,507       348,894       299,842  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)

3


Table of Contents

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

                 
    September 30,   December 31,
    2004
  2003
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 318,045     $ 239,431  
Receivables, net
    118,414       229,839  
Inventories
    86,951       136,807  
Current assets of discontinued operations
    5,808       6,101  
Other
    171,957       61,146  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total current assets
    701,175       673,324  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
    1,192,619       1,229,765  
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
    1,370,412       1,083,035  
Cemetery property, at cost
    1,534,642       1,524,847  
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net
    969,849       1,277,583  
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
    4,340       3,217  
Deferred charges and other assets
    668,151       738,011  
Goodwill
    1,167,092       1,195,422  
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
    699,888        
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 8,308,168     $ 7,725,204  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $ 369,608     $ 449,497  
Current maturities of long-term debt
    59,025       182,682  
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
    9,187       7,600  
Income taxes
    7,466       29,576  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total current liabilities
    445,286       669,355  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Long-term debt
    1,235,691       1,519,189  
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
    480,514       1,612,347  
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
    874,298       1,575,352  
Deferred income taxes
    311,583       418,375  
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations
    69,647       53,930  
Other liabilities
    361,360       349,698  
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
    1,977,856        
Commitments and contingencies (note 12)
               
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
    675,140        
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 332,658,017 and 302,039,871, issued and outstanding (net of 7,970,268 and 2,469,445 treasury shares, at par)
    332,658       302,040  
Capital in excess of par value
    2,451,512       2,274,664  
Unearned compensation
    (2,264 )      
Accumulated deficit
    (850,608 )     (938,063 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (54,505 )     (111,683 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,876,793       1,526,958  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 8,308,168     $ 7,725,204  
 
   
 
     
 
 

(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)

4


Table of Contents

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

                 
    Nine months ended
    September 30,
    2004
  2003
            (Restated)
            note 17
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 87,455     $ 54,662  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Net income from discontinued operations
    (35,375 )     (2,005 )
Loss (gains) on early extinguishments of debt
    16,770       (2,079 )
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax
    48,061        
Depreciation and amortization
    103,607       122,120  
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes
    (6,507 )     7,635  
(Gains) and impairment losses on dispositions, net
    (33,018 )     (5,413 )
Other operating (income) expense
    (6,932 )     1,724  
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions:
               
Decrease in receivables
    20,213       52,291  
Decrease in other assets
    964       32,617  
Increase in payables and other liabilities
    19,757       33,080  
Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities
    (30,461 )     1,289  
Net effect of cemetery production and deliveries
    (4,159 )     (1,876 )
Other
    348       10,468  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations
    180,723       304,513  
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations
    2,503       (925 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    183,226       303,588  
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (67,495 )     (79,864 )
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment
    30,326       52,186  
Proceeds and distributions from joint ventures and equity investments, net of cash retained
    330,789       30,802  
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    (1,818 )      
Payment of purchase obligations to former owners of acquired business
    (51,749 )      
Net deposits of restricted funds and other
    (119,085 )     (56,230 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations
    120,968       (53,106 )
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations
    (132 )     (373 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    120,836       (53,479 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
    241,237        
Payments of debt
    (124,752 )     (86,604 )
Early extinguishments of debt
    (313,778 )     (194,019 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    6,040        
Purchase of Company common stock
    (34,812 )      
Bank overdrafts and other
          (10,349 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (226,065 )     (290,972 )
Effect of foreign currency
    617       4,158  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    78,614       (36,705 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    239,431       200,625  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 318,045     $ 163,920  
 
   
 
     
 
 

(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)

5


Table of Contents

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

                                                 
                                    Accumulated    
            Capital in                   other    
    Common   excess of   Unearned   Accumulated   comprehensive    
    Stock
  par value
  Compensation
  deficit
  loss
  Total
Balance at December 31, 2003
  $ 302,040     $ 2,274,664     $     $ (938,063 )   $ (111,683 )   $ 1,526,958  
Net income
                            87,455               87,455  
Other comprehensive income:
                                               
Foreign currency translation
                                    (25,427 )     (25,427 )
Minimum pension liability
                                    33,599       33,599  
Reclassification for translation adjustments realized in net income
                                    49,006       49,006  
 
                                           
 
 
Total other comprehensive income
                                            57,178  
 
                                           
 
 
Contributions to employee 401(k) plan
    2,110       12,048                               14,158  
Stock option exercises and other
    1,658       6,397                               8,055  
Debt conversion
    32,034       185,120                               217,154  
Restricted stock award
    428       2,483       (2,911 )                      
Restricted stock amortization
                    647                       647  
Purchase of common stock
    (5,612 )     (29,200 )                             (34,812 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at September 30, 2004
  $ 332,658     $ 2,451,512     $ (2,264 )   $ (850,608 )   $ (54,505 )   $ 1,876,793  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)

6


Table of Contents

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

1. Nature of Operations

Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is the world’s largest provider of funeral and cemetery services. The Company owns and operates funeral service locations, cemeteries and crematoria located in seven countries. The Company also has a minority interest equity investment in funeral operations in France. In addition to its cemetery and funeral operations, the Company owns and operates Kenyon International Emergency Services, a disaster response team that engages in mass fatality and emergency response services.

     The funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, crematoria and related businesses. Personnel at the funeral service locations provide all professional services relating to funerals, including the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles, and preparation and embalming services. Funeral related merchandise (including caskets, coffins, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers and other ancillary products and services) is sold at funeral service locations. Certain funeral service locations contain crematoria. The Company sells preneed funeral services whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral to be performed in the future. The Company’s cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights (including mausoleum spaces, lots and lawn crypts) and sell cemetery related merchandise (including stone and bronze memorials, burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization products) and services (primarily merchandise installations and burial openings and closings). Cemetery items are sold on an atneed or preneed basis. Personnel at cemeteries perform interment services and provide management and maintenance of cemetery grounds. Certain cemeteries operate crematoria, and certain cemeteries contain gardens specifically for the purpose of cremation memorialization.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned subsidiaries and are unaudited but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals and any other adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results for these periods. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in a manner consistent with the accounting policies described in the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2003, unless otherwise disclosed herein, and should be read in conjunction therewith. The accompanying year-end consolidated balance sheet was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year period.

     The Company has reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current period financial presentation with no effect on previously reported results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

7


Table of Contents

     The effective tax rate in the three months ended September 30, 2004 was an expense of 24.9% compared to a benefit of 38.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2003. The 2004 rate was favorably impacted by a $2,356 tax benefit adjustment resulting from a change in estimated 2003 federal tax liabilities. The tax benefit in the three months ended September 30, 2003 is due to the net loss for the quarter. The effective tax rate in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was a benefit of 4.7% compared to an expense of 36.2% in the same period of 2003. The unusual tax rate in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is due to non-cash tax benefits recognized from the joint venture of the French operations consummated in March 2004 and the sale of the Company’s equity investment in the United Kingdom in the second quarter of 2004. For more information, see note fifteen to the consolidated financial statements.

Equity Investments

At September 30, 2004, the Company had a minority investment in certain funeral operations in France. The Company accounts for this investment using the equity method of accounting for investments recorded in Deferred charges and other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Treasury Stock

The Company recently announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100,000 to repurchase its common stock. The Company makes purchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions. The Company accounts for the repurchase of its common stock under the par value method. The Company uses the average cost method on the subsequent reissuance of treasury shares. Any resulting differences between the average cost and the current market value upon issuance of treasury stock to the Company’s 401(k) plans are expensed as compensation cost.

3. Accounting Changes and New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reached consensus on the guidance provided by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 03-1 (“EITF 03-1”), “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” The guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within the scope of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” EITF 03-1 specifies that an impairment would be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. EITF 03-1 was scheduled to be effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. The measurement and recognition provisions relating to debt and equity securities have been delayed until the FASB issues additional guidance. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of EITF 03-1 during the period ended June 30, 2004. The adoption of the measurement and recognition provisions will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, result of operations or liquidity of the Company.

Variable Interest Entities

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51.” This interpretation clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties.

In December 2003, the FASB revised FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46R).

8


Table of Contents

     Under the provisions of FIN 46R, the Company is required to consolidate certain cemeteries and trust assets. Merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are considered variable interest entities because the trusts meet the conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1) of FIN 46R. That is, as a group, the equity investors (if any) do not have sufficient equity at risk and do not have the direct or indirect ability through voting or similar rights to make decisions about the trusts’ activities that have a significant effect on the success of the trusts. FIN 46R requires the Company to consolidate merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts for which the Company is the primary beneficiary (i.e., those for which the Company absorbs a majority of the trusts’ expected losses). The Company is the primary beneficiary of a trust whenever a majority of the assets of the trust are attributable to deposits of customers of the Company.

Consolidation of Trusts: The Company implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, which resulted in the consolidation of the Company’s preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trust assets and the Company’s cemetery perpetual care trusts. No cumulative effect of an accounting change was recognized by the Company as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R as it relates to the consolidation of the trusts. The implementation of FIN 46R affects certain line items on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as described below; however, there is no impact to net income in the statement of operations as a result of the implementation. Additionally, the implementation of FIN 46R did not result in any net changes to the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows; however, it does require certain financing and investing activities to be disclosed. See notes four through six to the consolidated financial statements.

     Although FIN 46R requires consolidation of most of the merchandise and service and perpetual care trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, the customers are the legal beneficiaries. In the case of cemetery perpetual care trusts, the Company does not have a legal right to the perpetual care trust assets. For these reasons, upon consolidation of the trusts, the Company recognizes non-controlling interests in its financial statements to reflect third party interests in these trusts in accordance with FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liability and Equity” (SFAS 150). The Company classifies deposits to merchandise and service trusts as non-controlling liability interests and classifies deposits to cemetery perpetual care trusts as non-controlling equity interests.

     The Company records cash received from customers, which has not been deposited in trusts as restricted cash in Deferred charges and other assets in its consolidated balance sheet. At September 30, 2004, these pending deposits totaled $10,800. The Company continues to account for amounts received from customers prior to delivery of merchandise or services that are not required to be deposited in merchandise and service trusts as deferred revenue.

     Beginning March 31, 2004, the Company recognizes net realized investment earnings of the merchandise and service trusts and perpetual care trusts, as well as the related trustee investment expenses and taxes, within Other income, net . The Company then recognizes a corresponding expense within Other income, net representing the net realized earnings of those trusts that are attributable to the non-controlling interest holders. The corresponding credit for this expense is reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts for merchandise and service trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts for cemetery perpetual care trusts. The sum of these expenses recorded in Other income, net offset the net realized earnings of such trusts also recognized within Other income, net . Accordingly, the Company’s net income in the consolidated statement of operations is not affected by consolidation of the trusts in accordance with FIN 46R.

     To the extent the earnings of the trusts are distributed prior to the delivery of merchandise and/or services, a corresponding amount of non-controlling interest is reclassified to deferred revenue until the corresponding revenues are recognized. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, the Company recognizes as revenues, amounts previously attributed to non-controlling interests and deferred revenues upon the performance of services and delivery of merchandise, including earnings accumulated in these trusts. In the case of the cemetery perpetual care trusts, distributable earnings are recognized in cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs.

     Prior to the implementation of FIN 46R and the consolidation of the trusts, monies received from customers and deposited into merchandise and service trusts until maturity of the preneed contract were recorded as receivables due from trust assets. Upon

9


Table of Contents

implementation of FIN 46R, the Company replaced receivables due from trust assets with the trust assets, at market, to the extent the Company was required to consolidate the trusts.

     An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contract that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust assets, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust assets. As such, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R.

     Both the merchandise and services trusts and the cemetery perpetual care trusts hold investments in marketable securities that are classified as available-for-sale by the Company under the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”). In accordance with SFAS 115, available-for-sale securities of the trusts are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and initially recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Using the guidance in EITF Topic D-41, “Adjustments in Assets and Liabilities for Holding Gains and Losses as Related to the Implementation of FASB Statement No. 115” (“Topic D-41”), unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities of the trusts attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are not recorded as Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) , but are recorded as an adjustment to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts . Therefore, unrealized gains and losses attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts . The gross effect from applying Topic D-41 on the Company’s Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is disclosed in note fourteen of the consolidated financial statements. However, the Company’s Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the face of the balance sheet is ultimately not affected by consolidation of the trusts.

     For additional discussion of the Company’s accounting policies after the implementation of FIN 46R, see notes four through seven to the consolidated financial statements.

Consolidation of Certain Cemeteries: Effective as of March 31, 2004, the Company consolidated certain cemeteries managed by the Company in accordance with FIN 46R. The Company recognized an after tax charge of $14,462, representing the cumulative effect of an accounting change, as a result of consolidating these cemeteries. The results of operations and cash flows of these cemeteries are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and cash flows beginning March 31, 2004. Excluding the cumulative effect of accounting change, the effect of consolidating these entities did not have a significant impact on the Company’s reported results of operations.

Insurance Funded Preneed Insurance Contracts

The Company has changed its method of accounting for insurance funded preneed contracts as the Company has concluded that its insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not assets and liabilities as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6, “Elements in Financial Statements.” Therefore, the Company has removed from its consolidated balance sheet amounts relating to insurance funded preneed funeral contracts previously recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and Deferred preneed funeral revenues , which at December 31, 2003, were $3,505,094, respectively. The removal of these amounts did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity, results of operations or cash flows. See note four to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on insurance related preneed funeral balances.

Pension Plans

In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits” (SFAS 132R). SFAS 132R requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The Company has adopted the revised disclosure requirements. The Company’s pension plans are frozen with no cost benefits accreting to participants except interest.

     Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed its accounting for gains and losses on its pension plan assets and liabilities. The Company now recognizes such gains and losses in its consolidated statement of operations as such gains and losses are incurred under pension accounting. Prior to January 1, 2004, the Company amortized the difference between actual and expected investment returns

10


Table of Contents

and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier recognition). The Company believes the new method of accounting better reflects the economic nature of the Company’s pension plans and recognizes gains and losses on the pension plan assets and liabilities in the year the gains or losses occur. As a result of this accounting change, the Company recognized a charge for the cumulative effect of an accounting change of $33,599 (net of tax) as of January 1, 2004. This amount represents accumulated unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and liabilities. In addition, for interim periods, the Company records net pension expense or income reflecting estimated returns on plan assets and obligations. The Company will recognize actual gains and losses on plan assets and obligations as actuarial information becomes available upon review of the annual remeasurement. See note ten to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on pensions.

     The three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 pro forma amounts in the table below reflect the new policy to recognize gains and losses on the pension plans as incurred and reflect interim estimates as mentioned above.

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30, 2003
  September 30, 2003
    Historical
  Pro forma
  Historical
  Pro forma
    (Restated           (Restated        
    note 17)           note 17)        
(Loss) income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
  $ (5,391 )   $ (2,055 )   $ 52,657     $ 59,737  
Net (loss) income
  $ (4,732 )   $ (1,396 )   $ 54,662     $ 61,742  
Amounts per common share:
                               
Net (loss) income – basic
  $ (.02 )   $ (.01 )   $ .18     $ .21  
Net (loss) income – diluted
  $ (.02 )   $ (.01 )   $ .18     $ .21  

4. Preneed Funeral Activities

The Company sells price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through various programs. Because the services or merchandise will not be provided until the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the customer payments under these contracts be protected for the benefit of the customers pursuant to applicable law. Some or all of the funds may be required to be placed into trust accounts or a surety bond may be posted in lieu of trusting (collectively “trust funded preneed funeral contracts”). Alternatively, where allowed, customers may purchase a life insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies to fund their preneed funeral (“insurance funded preneed funeral contracts”). The insurance policy proceeds, which include increasing insurance benefits, will be used to pay the Company for the funeral goods and services selected at the time of contract origination. Under either customer funding option, the Company enters into a preneed funeral contract with the customer to provide funeral services in the future. The contract amounts associated with unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet. Effective March 31, 2004, the Company changed certain aspects of its accounting for trust funded preneed funeral contracts upon implementation of FIN 46R. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements. After the change, when a trust funded preneed funeral contract is consummated, the Company records an asset (included in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments ) and corresponding liability (included in Deferred preneed funeral revenues ) for the contract price. When the Company receives payments from the customer, the Company deposits the amount required by law into the trust and reclasses the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed funeral revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts . The Company deposited $8,542 and $32,770 into trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and withdrew $18,509 and $38,817 from trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

     Direct selling costs related to trust funded preneed funeral contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding trust funded preneed funeral contract revenue when recognized. Deferred selling costs associated with trust funded preneed funeral contracts were $111,953 and $113,920 at September 30, 2004 and at December 31, 2003, respectively. Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sales of insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are expensed as incurred.

11


Table of Contents

Preneed Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments

Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments , net of allowance for cancellation, represent trust assets and customer receivables related to unperformed, price-guaranteed trust funded preneed funeral contracts. The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:

                 
    September 30, 2004
  December 31, 2003
Receivables due from trust assets, at cost
  $     $ 1,201,059  
Trust investments, at market
    1,039,118        
Receivables from customers
    168,580       190,332  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    1,207,698       1,391,391  
Allowance for cancellation
    (15,079 )     (161,626 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
  $ 1,192,619     $ 1,229,765  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contracts that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust investments, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust assets. As such, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R.

     Upon cancellation of a trust funded preneed funeral contract, a customer is generally entitled to receive a refund of the funds held in trust. In many jurisdictions, the Company may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust including investment income. As a result, when realized or unrealized losses of a trust result in trust funded preneed funeral contracts being under-funded, the Company assesses such contracts to determine whether a loss provision should be recorded. No loss amounts have been required to be recognized as of September 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003.

      Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments are reduced by the trust investment earnings the Company has been allowed to withdraw in certain states prior to maturity and amounts received from customers that are not required to be deposited into trust, pursuant to various state laws. These earnings are recorded in Deferred preneed funeral revenues until the service is performed or the merchandise is delivered.

     The cost and market values associated with funeral trust investments at September 30, 2004 are detailed below. The market value of funeral trust investments was based primarily on quoted market prices at September 30, 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for other-than-temporary impairment and as a result of its most recent review believes the unrealized losses of $29,410 related to trust investments are temporary in nature. At September 30, 2004, the Company’s unrealized losses greater than one year in duration primarily related to certain private equity and other investments.

12


Table of Contents

                                 
            Unrealized   Unrealized    
    Cost
  Gains
  Losses
  Market
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 57,073     $     $     $ 57,073  
Fixed income securities:
                               
U.S. Treasury
    97,689       339       (2,354 )     95,674  
Foreign government
    73,079       839       (102 )     73,816  
Corporate
    13,513       310       (342 )     13,481  
Mortgage-backed
    103,071       2,910       (5,849 )     100,132  
Insurance-backed
    191,400                   191,400  
Asset-backed and other
    6,492       1,124       (1,394 )     6,222  
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
    307,815       28,998       (6,782 )     330,031  
Mutual funds:
                               
Equity
    56,787       8,734       (303 )     65,218  
Fixed income
    43,353       668       (44 )     43,977  
Private equity and other
    73,911       423       (12,240 )     62,094  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Trust investments
  $ 1,024,183     $ 44,345     $ (29,410 )   $ 1,039,118  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Market value as of a percentage of cost
                            101.46 %
 
                           
 
 

     Maturities of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 are estimated as follows:

         
    Market
Due in one year or less
  $ 73,642  
Due in one to five years
    151,149  
Due in five to ten years
    70,754  
Thereafter
    185,180  
 
   
 
 
 
  $ 480,725  
 
   
 
 

     During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, purchases of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $269,884 and $493,932, respectively and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $276,927 and $561,306, respectively. These transactions resulted in $13,950 and $10,414 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, sales transactions resulted in $29,981 and $17,059 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of funeral trust available-for-sale securities sold during the period.

Deferred Preneed Funeral Revenues

At September 30, 2004, Deferred preneed funeral revenues , net of allowance for cancellation, represent future funeral service revenues including distributed trust investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed funeral contracts that are not held in trust accounts. Future funeral service revenues and net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts . At December 31, 2003 and prior to the implementation of FIN 46R, Deferred preneed funeral revenues represent the original price of a trust funded preneed funeral contract plus the net trust investment earnings.

     An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. However, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R, as the Company no longer provides an allowance for the deferred preneed funeral revenues now included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts .

Insurance Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts

Not included in the consolidated balance sheet are insurance funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party insurers. The net amount of these contracts that have not been fulfilled at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, including increasing insurance benefits and reduced by an allowance for cancellation, was approximately $2,204,237 and $3,505,094 (of which $1,515,984 related to the Company’s French operations at December 31, 2003), respectively, and were previously included in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments with a corresponding liability in Deferred preneed funeral revenues . The proceeds of the life insurance policies or annuity contracts will be reflected in funeral revenues as these funerals are performed by the Company.

13


Table of Contents

5. Preneed Cemetery Activities

The Company sells price-guaranteed preneed cemetery contracts providing for future property interment rights, merchandise or services in advance of need at prices prevailing when the agreements are signed. Some or all of the funds received under these contracts for merchandise or services may be required to be placed into trust accounts, or a surety bond may be posted in lieu of trusting, pursuant to applicable law. Effective March 31, 2004, the Company changed certain aspects of its accounting for preneed cemetery contracts upon implementation of FIN 46R. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements. When the Company receives payments from the customer, the Company deposits the amount required by law into the trust and reclasses the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed cemetery revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts . The Company deposited $42,997 and $75,835 into the trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and withdrew $24,257 and $57,581 from the trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

     Direct selling costs related to preneed cemetery contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding revenue when recognized. Deferred selling costs related to preneed cemetery contracts were $205,504 and $205,123 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

Preneed Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments

Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments , net of allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments and customer receivables (net of unearned finance charges) for contracts sold in advance of when the property interment rights, merchandise or services are needed. The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:

                 
    September 30, 2004
  December 31, 2003
Receivables due from trust assets, at cost
  $     $ 862,265  
Trust investments, at market
    1,000,652        
Receivables from customers
    493,130       522,079  
Unearned finance charges
    (69,899 )     (75,785 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    1,423,883       1,308,559  
Allowance for cancellation
    (53,471 )     (225,524 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
  $ 1,370,412     $ 1,083,035  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     Interest rates on cemetery contracts ranged from 3.5% to 15.7% for both periods presented. The average term of a financed preneed cemetery contract is approximately 4.6 years.

     An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience with a corresponding decrease in Deferred preneed cemetery revenues . The amount of the allowance has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contract that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust investments, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust investments.

     The cost and market values associated with the cemetery merchandise and service trust investments at September 30, 2004 are detailed below. The market value of cemetery trust investments was based primarily on quoted market prices at September 30, 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for other-than-temporary impairment and as a result of the Company’s most recent review believes the unrealized losses of $24,891 related to trust investments are temporary in nature. At September 30, 2004, the Company’s unrealized losses greater than one year in duration primarily related to private equity and other investments.

14


Table of Contents

                                 
            Unrealized   Unrealized    
    Cost
  Gains
  Losses
  Market
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 132,841     $     $     $ 132,841  
Fixed income securities:
                               
U.S. Treasury
    111,442       3,729       (262 )     114,909  
Foreign government
    14,571       570       (3 )     15,138  
Corporate
    14,220       415       (100 )     14,535  
Mortgage-backed
    172,902       4,005       (882 )     176,025  
Asset-backed and other
    22,996       1,014       (58 )     23,952  
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
    287,818       40,718       (14,650 )     313,886  
Mutual funds:
                               
Equity
    102,464       17,819       (214 )     120,069  
Fixed income
    37,313       366       (70 )     37,609  
Private equity and other
    60,227       113       (8,652 )     51,688  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Trust investments
  $ 956,794     $ 68,749     $ (24,891 )   $ 1,000,652  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Market value as a percentage of cost
                            104.58 %
 
                           
 
 

     Maturities of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 are estimated as follows:

         
    Market
Due in one year or less
  $ 23,423  
Due in one to five years
    61,965  
Due in five to ten years
    73,473  
Thereafter
    185,698  
 
   
 
 
 
  $ 344,559  
 
   
 
 

     During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, purchases of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $142,468 and $426,831, respectively and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $185,794 and $470,090, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $13,553 and $12,215 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, sales transactions resulted in $30,279 and $20,755 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of cemetery trust available-for-sale securities sold during the period.

Deferred Preneed Cemetery Revenues

At September 30, 2004, Deferred preneed cemetery revenues , net of allowance for cancellation, represent future preneed cemetery revenues including distributed trust investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts. Future contract revenues and net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts . At December 31, 2003 and prior to the implementation of FIN 46R, Deferred preneed cemetery revenues represent the original price of a trust funded preneed cemetery contract plus the net trust investment earnings.

     An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. However, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R, as the Company no longer provides an allowance for the deferred preneed cemetery revenues now included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts .

6. Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts

The Company is required by state or provincial law to pay into perpetual care trusts a portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property interment rights. As a result of the implementation of FIN 46R, the Company has consolidated the perpetual care trust investments with a corresponding amount recorded as Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts . The Company deposited $5,877 and $12,091 into trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and withdrew $11,951 and $17,616 from trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

15


Table of Contents

     The cost and market value associated with trust investments held in perpetual care trusts at September 30, 2004 are detailed below. The market value of perpetual care trusts was based primarily on quoted market prices at September 30, 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for other-than-temporary impairments and as a result of its most recent review believes the unrealized losses of $4,802 related to trust assets are temporary in nature. There were no significant investments with unrealized losses at September 30, 2004 greater than one year in duration.

                                 
    Cost
  Unrealized Gains
  Unrealized Losses
  Market
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 29,132     $     $     $ 29,132  
Fixed income securities:
                               
U.S. Treasury
    51,407       1,633       (54 )     52,986  
Foreign government
    28,860       1,202       (7 )     30,055  
Corporate
    78,862       4,467       (554 )     82,775  
Mortgage-backed
    101,580       1,449       (488 )     102,541  
Asset-backed
    54,423       342       (241 )     54,524  
Equity securities:
                               
Preferred stock
    13,771       1,375       (198 )     14,948  
Common stock
    83,422       10,231       (2,241 )     91,412  
Mutual funds:
                               
Equity
    30,067       8,228       (206 )     38,089  
Fixed income
    147,205       3,741       (318 )     150,628  
Private equity and other
    50,047       3,246       (495 )     52,798  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Perpetual care trust investments
  $ 668,776     $ 35,914     $ (4,802 )   $ 699,888  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Market value as a percentage of cost
                            104.65 %
 
                           
 
 

     Maturities of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 are estimated as follows:

         
    Market
Due in one year or less
  $ 1,249  
Due in one to five years
    99,260  
Due in five to ten years
    73,293  
Thereafter
    149,079  
 
   
 
 
 
  $ 322,881  
 
   
 
 

     During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, purchases of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts were $284,909 and $571,078, respectively and sales of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts were $283,402 and $559,921, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $4,638 and $1,871 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, these sales transactions resulted in $8,225 and $5,553 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of perpetual care trusts available-for-sale securities sold during the period.

     Distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized earnings related to these perpetual care trust investments were $9,974 and $7,428 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, and $22,778 and $20,675 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

7. Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts and in Perpetual Care Trusts

Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts

16


Table of Contents

Effective March 31, 2004, the Company consolidated the merchandise and service trusts associated with its preneed funeral and cemetery activities as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R. Although FIN 46R requires the consolidation of the merchandise and service trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. The customers are the legal beneficiaries of these merchandise and service trusts, and therefore, their interests in these trusts represent a non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements.

Non-Controlling Interest in Perpetual Care Trusts

The Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts reflected in the consolidated balance sheet represents the cemetery perpetual care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of the perpetual care trusts. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements.

     The components of Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts and Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 are detailed below.

                                 
                            Cemetery
                            perpetual
    Preneed funeral
  Preneed cemetery
  Total
  care
Trust investments, at market value
  $ 1,039,118     $ 1,000,652     $ 2,039,770     $ 699,888  
Less:
                               
Debt associated with certain trust investments
    31,993       27,543       59,536       18,362  
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes and other
    897       1,481       2,378       6,386  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    32,890       29,024       61,914       24,748  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Non-controlling interest
  $ 1,006,228     $ 971,628     $ 1,977,856     $ 675,140  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Debt Associated with Certain Trusts Consolidated by the Company

Certain trusts, consolidated with the adoption of FIN 46R and recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments and Cemetery perpetual care trust investments , have indirect interests in real estate partnerships. These partnerships have incurred indebtedness of $77,898 that is included in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004. The trusts’ obligation on this indebtedness is limited to their investment in the respective partnerships. The debt has interest rates ranging from 5.0% to 8.5% and maturities between 2011 and 2019.

Other income, net

The components of Other income, net in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2004 are detailed below. See notes three through six to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the amounts related to the funeral, cemetery and perpetual care trusts.

17


Table of Contents

                                         
    Funeral   Cemetery   Cemetery perpetual        
    trusts
  trusts
  care trusts
  Other, net
  Total
Realized gains
  $ 13,950     $ 13,553     $ 4,638     $     $ 32,141  
Realized losses
    (10,414 )     (12,215 )     (1,871 )           (24,500 )
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
    4,101       6,138       10,101             20,340  
Trust expenses and income taxes
    (2,554 )     (3,722 )     (1,626 )           (7,902 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net trust investment income
    5,083       3,754       11,242             20,079  
Interest expense related to non- controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trust investments
    (5,083 )     (3,754 )                 (8,837 )
Interest expense related to non- controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments
                (11,242 )           (11,242 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total non-controlling interest
                             
Other income
                      4,569       4,569  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total other income, net
  $     $     $     $ 4,569     $ 4,569  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

The components of Other income, net in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 are detailed below.

                                         
                    Cemetery        
    Funeral   Cemetery   perpetual        
    trusts
  trusts
  care trusts
  Other, net
  Total
Realized gains
  $ 29,981     $ 30,279     $ 8,225     $     $ 68,485  
Realized losses
    (17,059 )     (20,755 )     (5,553 )           (43,367 )
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
    9,349       11,924       19,621             40,894  
Trust expenses and income taxes
    (4,731 )     (6,159 )     (4,243 )           (15,133 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net trust investment income
    17,540       15,289       18,050             50,879  
Interest expense related to non- controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trust investments
    (17,540 )     (15,289 )                 (32,829 )
Interest expense related to non- controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments
                (18,050 )           (18,050 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total non-controlling interest
                             
Other income
                      12,758       12,758  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total other income, net
  $     $     $     $ 12,758     $ 12,758  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     Amounts included in Other income within Other income, net primarily relate to foreign currency gains and losses, interest income on notes receivable and general agency commissions from third party insurance companies.

8. Debt

Debt was as follows:

                 
    September 30, 2004
  December 31, 2003
7.375% notes due April 2004
  $     $ 111,190  
8.375% notes due December 2004
    50,797       50,797  
6.0% notes due December 2005
    63,801       272,451  
7.2% notes due 2006
    150,000       150,000  
6.875% notes due 2007
    143,475       143,475  
6.5% notes due 2008
    195,000       195,000  
6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008, conversion price of $6.92 per share
          312,694  
7.7% notes due 2009
    358,266       358,266  

18


Table of Contents

                 
    September 30, 2004
  December 31, 2003
7.875% debentures due 2013
    55,627       55,627  
6.75% notes due 2016
    250,000        
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest rates from 4.75% to 5.5%, conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share
    30,375       38,368  
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
    41,576       63,597  
Deferred charges
    (44,201 )     (49,594 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total debt
    1,294,716       1,701,871  
Less current maturities
    (59,025 )     (182,682 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total long-term debt
  $ 1,235,691     $ 1,519,189  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     The Company’s consolidated debt had a weighted average interest rate of 7.08% and 6.95% at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Approximately 99% of the total debt had a fixed interest rate at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

Bank Credit Agreements

The Company’s bank credit agreement, which was executed on August 11, 2004, provides a total lending commitment of $200,000, including a sublimit of $175,000 for letters of credit. The agreement, which matures August 2007, replaces a $185,000 facility that was set to expire in July 2005. Upon closing, the Company transferred $72,456 in letters of credit, which were originally issued under the previously existing bank credit agreement. The new bank credit facility provides the Company with greater flexibility in terms of acquisitions, dividends and share repurchases. It is secured by the stock of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and these domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the Company’s indebtedness associated with this facility. The facility contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, maximum capital expenditure limitations, minimum net worth requirements and certain cash distribution restrictions. Interest rates for the outstanding borrowings will be based on various indices as determined by the Company. The Company also will pay a quarterly fee on the unused commitment, which ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.

Debt Issuances and Additions

In connection with $250,000 of senior unsecured 6.75% notes due April 1, 2016, issued on April 14, 2004 in an unregistered offering, the Company filed a registration statement on September 2, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, the interest rate on the new notes increased by 0.25% for the period that the Company failed to file the registration statement. During the period of July 14, 2004 to September 1, 2004, the interest rate on the notes increased by 0.25% for an aggregate incremental interest expense of $83. On September 2, 2004, the interest rate reverted to the stated rate of 6.75%. The majority of the holders of the unregistered notes have exchanged for registered notes.

     The holders of $221,633 of the Company’s 6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 converted their holdings to equity on June 22, 2004, pursuant to the terms of the notes. The Company paid $7,480 in accrued interest to the holders. Simultaneously, the Company exercised its option by redeeming the remaining outstanding $91,061 of the notes. The Company paid a total of $97,649, including interest and premium, to the holders of the redeemed notes and recognized a $5,606 loss on the early extinguishment of debt, recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt , in the consolidated statement of operations during the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

Debt Extinguishments and Reductions

In March 2004, in connection with the joint venture of the Company’s operations in France, mortgage notes and other debt was reduced by approximately $24,194 for capital lease obligations related to vehicles used in the French operations.

19


Table of Contents

     In connection with the pending sale of the Company’s Argentina operations, approximately $9,174 at September 30, 2004 and $9,694 at December 31, 2003 were reclassified from mortgage notes and other debt to Liabilities of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheet. For additional information regarding this matter, see note sixteen to the consolidated financial statements.

     On April 15, 2004, as required by the terms of the agreement, the Company repaid the remaining $111,190 of the 7.375% notes due 2004.

     On April 22, 2004, the Company extinguished $200,000 aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005, pursuant to the Offer to Purchase, dated March 24, 2004. The Company paid $214,233 to the tendering holders, including a premium and accrued interest. As a result of the transaction, the Company recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $10,831, recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt , in the consolidated statement of operations. In early May 2004, the Company also purchased $8,650 aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss of $333, recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt , in the consolidated statement of operations.

Additional Debt Disclosures

At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had deposited $188,176 and $95,325, respectively, in restricted, interest-bearing accounts that were pledged as collateral for various credit instruments and commercial commitments, including $135,000 included in Other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet which are held in escrow for settlement of certain litigation. The remaining $53,176 is included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

9. Derivatives

The Company occasionally participates in hedging activities using a variety of derivative instruments, including interest rate swap agreements, cross-currency swap agreements and forward exchange contracts. These instruments are used to hedge exposure to risk in the interest rate and foreign exchange rate markets. The Company has documented policies and procedures to monitor and control the use of derivative transactions, which may only be executed with a limited group of creditworthy financial institutions. The Company generally does not engage in derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes, nor is it a party to leveraged derivatives.

     During the first quarter of 2004, the Company executed certain forward exchange contracts, having an aggregate notional value of EUR 240,000 and a corresponding notional value of $300,011 to hedge its net foreign investment in France. Upon receipt of the net proceeds from the joint venture transaction, the Company settled these derivative instruments and recorded a gain of $8,919 in Other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity, which was then recognized pursuant to the sale of the Company’s operations in France in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net in the consolidated statement of operations.

     The Company also executed certain forward exchange contracts during the first half of 2004, having an aggregate notional value of GBP 22,436 and a corresponding notional value of $41,334, relating to the ultimate sale of its minority investment in and the repayment of its note receivable from a funeral and cemetery company in the United Kingdom. On April 8, 2004, the Company received the expected proceeds and settled these derivative instruments, recognizing a gain of $198, which was recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations during the three months ended June 30, 2004.

     The Company was not a party to any derivative instruments at September 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003.

10. Retirement Plans

The Company has a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan covering approximately 40% of its United States employees (US Pension Plan), a supplemental retirement plan for certain current and former key employees (SERP), a supplemental retirement plan for officers and certain key employees (Senior SERP) and a retirement plan for certain non-employee directors (Directors’ Plan). The Company also has a 401(k) employee savings plan.

     Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed the accounting for gains and losses on its pension plan assets and obligations. The Company recognizes such gains and losses in its consolidated statement of operations in the year such gains and losses are incurred. Prior to January 1, 2004, the Company amortized the difference between actual and expected investment returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier recognition). For additional discussion of this accounting change, see note three to the consolidated financial statements.

20


Table of Contents

     Effective January 1, 2001, the Company curtailed its US Pension Plan, SERP, Senior SERP and Directors’ Plan. As these plans have been frozen, the participants do not earn additional benefit from additional years of service and the Company does not incur new service cost.

     Retirement benefits for the US Pension Plan are generally based on years of service and compensation. Required contributions are actuarially determined amounts consistent with the funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Assets of the pension plan consist of core diversified and market neutral hedge funds, fixed income investments and marketable equity securities.

     Retirement benefits under the SERP are based on years of service and average monthly compensation, reduced by benefits under the US Pension Plan and Social Security. The Senior SERP provides retirement benefits based on years of service and position. The Directors’ Plan provides for an annual benefit to directors following their retirement, based on a vesting schedule.

     Most foreign employees are covered by their respective foreign government mandated or defined contribution plans that are adequately funded and are not considered significant to the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The plans’ liabilities and their related costs are computed in accordance with the laws of the individual countries and appropriate actuarial practices.

     The components of net periodic pension plan benefit cost for the three and nine months ended September 30 were as follows:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Service cost — benefits earned during the period
  $     $     $     $  
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
    633       2,474       5,123       7,422  
Return on plan assets
    (1,590 )     (1,702 )     (5,170 )     (5,106 )
Settlement/curtailment charge
          88             264  
Amortization of prior service cost
    47       46       137       138  
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
          1,897             5,690  
Recognized net actuarial gain
    (1,745 )           (1,745 )      
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ (2,655 )   $ 2,803     $ (1,655 )   $ 8,408  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     The Company recorded net pension income of $1,655 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 based on actuarial information obtained from the Plan’s annual remeasurement as of September 30, 2004. Due to the write off of the $54,873 unrecognized net loss associated with the change in accounting principle on January 1, 2004, the Company’s amortization of unrecognized net loss is $0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1,897 and $5,690 for the same periods of 2003.

     The plans’ weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net pension expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows. The three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2004 reflect an adjustment based on results from the annual remeasurement. Due to the curtailment of the plans in 2001, the assumed rate of compensation increase is $0.

                 
    September 30, 2004
  September 30, 2003
Discount rate used to determine obligations and related interest cost
    6.00 %     6.25 %
Assumed rate of return on plan assets
    8.00 %     9.00 %

SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan

The retirement benefits under the SERP, Senior SERP and Directors’ Plan are unfunded obligations of the Company. As of December 31, 2003, the benefit obligation of the SERP, Senior SERP and Directors’ Plan was $33,764; however, the Company holds various life insurance policies with the intent to use the proceeds or any cash value buildup from such policies to assist in meeting, at least to the extent of such assets, the Senior SERP’s funding requirements. The face value of these insurance policies is approximately $51,082 while the cash surrender value of these insurance policies is approximately $33,470 as of September 30, 2004. In July 2004, the Company paid off an $11,383 loan and $517 in interest associated with these policies.

21


Table of Contents

US Pension Plan

In March 2004, the Company voluntarily contributed $20,000 to the frozen US Pension Plan. The fair value of the plan assets as of September 30, 2004 is $88,383, compared to a projected benefit obligation of $110,649 at December 31, 2003. As a result of the previously mentioned accounting change, the minimum pension liability adjustment included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss was $0 as of September 30, 2004 compared to $33,599 at December 31, 2003.

     The plan’s weighted-average asset allocations by asset category are as follows:

                 
    September 30, 2004
  December 31, 2003
Core diversified and market neutral hedge funds
    54 %      
Equity securities
    33 %     74 %
Fixed income investments
    13 %     26 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total
    100 %     100 %

     Equity securities included shares of Company common stock in the amounts of $0 and $7,138 (nine percent of plan assets) at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. On March 31, 2004, the plan assets were rebalanced to include investments in core diversified and market neutral hedge funds.

     The primary investment objective of the plan is to achieve a rate of investment return over time that will allow the plan to achieve a fully funded status, while maintaining prudent investment return volatility levels. In 2004, the investment strategy was revised to have a lower percentage invested in traditional equity securities and fixed income securities and instead include investments in hedge funds allowing for reduced volatility with limited reduction of returns. The Company has an asset allocation strategy of 35% traditional equity, 15% fixed income and 50% hedge funds. The investment strategy is managed within ranges that are centered at specific allocation targets. The specific allocations within the strategy, as well as individual asset class ranges are as follows:

         
    Ranges
Large cap equity (value)
    10% - 25 %
Small cap growth (value)
    5% - 10 %
International equity
    5% - 10 %
Fixed income core bond
    0% - 25 %
Hedge funds:
       
Core diversified
    15% - 35 %
Market neutral
    15% - 35 %
Money market
    0% - 1 %

11. Segment Reporting

The Company’s operations are both product and geographically based, and the reportable operating segments presented below include funeral and cemetery operations. The Company’s geographic areas include North America, Europe and Other Foreign. Other Foreign consists of the Company’s operations in Singapore and South America. Europe includes operations in Germany and France. The Company conducts both funeral and cemetery operations in the North America, Europe and Other Foreign geographic areas.

     The Company has reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current period presentation with no effect on previously reported results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

22


Table of Contents

     The Company’s reportable segment information is as follows:

                         
                    Reportable
    Funeral
  Cemetery
  segments
Revenues from external customers:
                       
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 266,715     $ 136,637     $ 403,352  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 421,892     $ 144,569     $ 566,461  
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 982,148     $ 439,378     $ 1,421,526  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 1,287,266     $ 442,071     $ 1,729,337  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Gross profits:
                       
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 44,774     $ 23,495     $ 68,269  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 54,929     $ 14,017     $ 68,946  
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 183,045     $ 71,705     $ 254,750  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 212,379     $ 66,157     $ 278,536  

     The following table reconciles gross profits from reportable segments to the Company’s consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
            (Restated           (Restated
            note 17)           note 17)
Gross profits from reportable segments
  $ 68,269     $ 68,946     $ 254,750     $ 278,536  
General and administrative expenses
    (25,298 )     (52,775 )     (100,347 )     (110,454 )
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
    (3,281 )     (1,452 )     33,018       5,413  
Other operating income (expense)
                6,932       (1,724 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income
    39,690       14,719       194,353       171,771  
Interest expense
    (27,888 )     (34,835 )     (94,668 )     (107,968 )
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net
          176       (16,770 )     2,079  
Other income, net
    4,569       11,218       12,758       16,590  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes
  $ 16,371     $ (8,722 )   $ 95,673     $ 82,472  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

23


Table of Contents

     The Company’s geographic area information is as follows:

                                 
    North            
    America
  Europe
  Other Foreign
  Total
Revenues from external customers:
                               
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 392,053     $ 1,648     $ 9,651     $ 403,352  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 408,385     $ 149,950     $ 8,126     $ 566,461  
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 1,263,119     $ 132,139     $ 26,268     $ 1,421,526  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 1,278,752     $ 429,245     $ 21,340     $ 1,729,337  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net:
                               
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $ (3,476 )   $     $ 195     $ (3,281 )
2003
  $ (2,929 )   $ 1,477     $     $ (1,452 )
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 32,926     $ 92     $     $ 33,018  
2003
  $ 7,262     $ (899 )   $ (950 )   $ 5,413  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Other operating income (expense):
                               
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $     $     $     $  
2003
  $     $     $     $  
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 6,932     $     $     $ 6,932  
2003
  $ (1,724 )   $     $     $ (1,724 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income (expense):
                               
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 36,846     $ (79 )   $ 2,923     $ 39,690  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ (5,592 )   $ 17,829     $ 2,482     $ 14,719  
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 176,058     $ 11,501     $ 6,794     $ 194,353  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 115,314     $ 51,775     $ 4,682     $ 171,771  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Depreciation and amortization:
                               
Three months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 32,063     $     $ 344     $ 32,407  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 42,279     $     $ 227     $ 42,506  
Nine months ended September 30,
2004
  $ 102,247     $     $ 1,360     $ 103,607  
2003 (Restated – note 17)
  $ 121,808     $     $ 312     $ 122,120  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total assets at:
                               
September 30, 2004
  $ 8,159,626     $ 8,275     $ 140,267     $ 8,308,168  
December 31, 2003
  $ 7,034,062     $ 543,141     $ 148,001     $ 7,725,204  

     Included in the North America figures above are the following United States amounts:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
            (Restated           (Restated
            note 17)           note 17)
Revenues from external customers
  $ 371,045     $ 387,965     $ 1,191,538     $ 1,220,145  
Other operating income (expense)
  $     $     $ 8,030     $ (1,724 )
Operating income (loss)
  $ 33,603     $ (7,722 )   $ 160,513     $ 103,309  
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 30,543     $ 41,656     $ 96,642     $ 117,679  
Total assets (a)
  $ 7,779,049     $ 6,801,492     $ 7,779,049     $ 6,801,492  

(a) Prior year amounts are as of December 31, 2003.

24


Table of Contents

     Included in the Europe figures above are the following France amounts:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Revenues from external customers
  $     $ 148,412     $ 127,282     $ 424,060  
Operating income
  $     $ 17,578     $ 11,664     $ 51,081  
Total assets (a)
  $     $ 535,222     $     $ 535,222  

(a) Prior year amounts are as of December 31, 2003.

     The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the Company’s two segments are as follows:

                         
    Funeral
  Cemetery
  Total
Balance as of December 31, 2003
  $ 1,193,138     $ 2,284     $ 1,195,422  
Acquisitions
    1,912             1,912  
Dispositions
    (31,782 )     (20 )     (31,802 )
Effects of foreign currency and other
    1,560             1,560  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance as of September 30, 2004
  $ 1,164,828     $ 2,264     $ 1,167,092  

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Payment of Purchase Obligations

In connection with certain acquisitions made by the Company’s South America operations, the Company entered into contingent purchase obligations with certain former owners of those businesses. At December 31, 2003, the estimated $53,000 obligation was recorded in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. In July 2004, the Company paid $51,749 to satisfy this obligation.

Litigation

The Company is a party to various litigation matters, investigations and proceedings. For each of its outstanding legal matters, the Company evaluates the merits of the case, its exposure to the matter, possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. If the Company determines that an unfavorable outcome is probable and can be estimated, it establishes the necessary accruals. Certain insurance policies held by the Company may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse outcome of these litigation matters. The Company accrues such insurance recoveries when they become probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated. The following discussion describes certain litigation and proceedings as of November 5, 2004.

      In Re Service Corporation International; Cause No. H-99-0280; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the Consolidated Lawsuit). The Consolidated Lawsuit was filed in January 1999 and includes numerous separate lawsuits that were filed in various United States District Courts in Texas. The Consolidated Lawsuit has been certified as a class action and names as defendants the Company and three of the Company’s current or former executive officers or directors (the Individual Defendants).

     The Consolidated Lawsuit has been brought on behalf of all persons and entities who (i) acquired shares of Company common stock in the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company into Equity Corporation International (ECI); (ii) purchased shares of Company common stock in the open market during the period from July 17, 1998 through January 26, 1999 (the Class Period); (iii) purchased Company call options in the open market during the Class Period; (iv) sold Company put options in the open market during the Class Period; (v) held employee stock options in ECI that became options to purchase Company common stock pursuant to the merger; and (vi) held Company employee stock options to purchase Company common stock under a stock plan during the Class Period. Excluded from the class definition categories are the Individual Defendants, the members of their immediate families and all other persons who were directors or executive officers of the Company or its affiliated entities at any time during the Class Period.

25


Table of Contents

     The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Lawsuit alleged that defendants violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and failing to disclose material information concerning the Company’s preneed funeral business and other financial matters, including in connection with the ECI merger. The Consolidated Lawsuit sought recovery of an unspecified amount of monetary damages. A Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Lawsuit filed by the Company and the Individual Defendants has been pending before the Court.

     On April 20, 2004, the Company announced that it had entered into a memorandum of understanding to settle the Consolidated Lawsuit. The terms of the proposed settlement call for the Company to cause to be created a settlement fund in May 2004 totaling $65,000 in settlement of the claims. The Company and its insurance carriers have also entered into an agreement providing for the payment by the Company’s insurance carriers of $30,000 towards this settlement, which resulted in direct payments made by the Company of approximately $35,000.

     As a result of this proposed settlement, the Company recognized litigation related expenses in General and administrative expenses , net of amounts to be funded into escrow by the insurance carriers, of approximately $35,000 on a pretax basis in the first quarter of 2004. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company deposited $35,000 into escrow for this proposed settlement. This amount is included in Other current assets with a corresponding liability in Accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. At a hearing on November 4, 2004, the court entered an order approving the settlement. Subject to appeal, all claims under the Consolidated Lawsuit have been dismissed. The Company may also have additional potential liability for those who have opted out of the Consolidated Lawsuit. The most significant opt out claim is the subject of the T. Rowe Price Lawsuit discussed below.

     Several other related lawsuits have been filed against the Company and the Individual Defendants in Texas state courts by former SCI and ECI shareholders. These lawsuits include the following matters:

     No. 31820-99-2; Charles Fredrick v. Service Corp. International; In the District Court of Angelina County, Texas, filed February 16, 1999.

     No. 2004-28511; Thomas G. Conway, John T Conway and Trust U/W/O George M. Conway, Jr. v. Service Corporation International; In the 127th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, filed May 28, 2004 (the Conway Lawsuit).

     No. 2004-429637; T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund, Inc., et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al; In the 270th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas, filed June 7, 2004 (the T. Rowe Price Lawsuit).

     These lawsuits allege, among other things, violations of Texas securities law and statutory and common law fraud, and seek compensatory and exemplary damages. The plaintiffs in the Conway Lawsuit have not opted out of the Consolidated Lawsuit, and therefore they are precluded from prosecuting the Conway Lawsuit. For that reason, the Company expects the Conway Lawsuit to be dismissed in the near future. The plaintiffs in the other lawsuits have opted out of the Consolidated Lawsuit. In the other lawsuits, no discovery has occurred and the Company is unable to determine whether an adverse outcome is probable. The Company intends to aggressively defend such lawsuits.

     The plaintiffs in the T. Rowe Price Lawsuit consist of investment companies and trust funds who were former ECI and SCI shareholders and who have opted out of the proposed settlement of the Consolidated Lawsuit. They allege that the Company and the Individual Defendants violated the Texas Securities Act by making materially false and misleading statements and failing to disclose material information concerning the Company’s business and other financial matters, including in connection with the ECI merger. The T. Rowe Price Lawsuit seeks recovery of at least $32,000 in actual damages plus unspecified exemplary damages.

     The plaintiffs in the Conway Lawsuit also filed a separate arbitration styled Thomas G. Conway et al v. Service Corporation International, et al; Cause No. 70 Y 168 00748 02 before the American Arbitration Association (AAA) (Conway action). The Conway action raised claims distinct from those claims alleged in the Conway Lawsuit. The Company has recently settled the Conway action.

      Joan Light, Shirley Eisenbert and Carol Prisco v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels, and Service Corporation International; Case No. 01-21376 CA 08; In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, General Jurisdiction Division (Consumer Lawsuit). The Consumer Lawsuit was filed December 19, 2001 and named the Company, a subsidiary and other related entities as defendants. On August 19, 2003, the Court certified a class

26


Table of Contents

comprising all persons with burial plots or family members buried at Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels in Florida. Excluded from the class definition were persons whose claims had been reduced to judgment or had been settled as of the date of class certification. The defendants appealed the trial court’s order regarding class certification.

     The plaintiffs alleged that defendants had failed to exercise reasonable care in handling remains by secretly: (i) dumping remains in a wooded area; (ii) burying remains in locations other than the ones purchased; (iii) crushing vaults to make room for other vaults; (iv) burying remains on top of the other or head to foot rather than side-by-side; (v) moving remains; and (vi) co-mingling remains.

     The plaintiffs in the Consumer Lawsuit alleged that the above conduct constituted negligence, tortious interference with the handling of dead bodies, infliction of emotional distress, and violation of industry specific state statutes, as well as the state’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. The Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint to include punitive damages. Plaintiffs also sought equitable/injunctive relief in the form of a permanent injunction requiring defendants to fund a court supervised program that provides for monitoring and studying of the cemetery and any disturbed remains to insure their proper disposition.

     Counsel for plaintiffs in the Consumer Lawsuit also represented individuals who filed numerous separate lawsuits setting forth individual claims similar to those in the Consumer Lawsuit. These lawsuits include Sheldon Cohen, surviving son of Hymen Cohen, deceased v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels and Service Corporation International; Case No. 02014679; In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, and Marian Novins, surviving daughter of Harold Wells deceased v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels, and Service Corporation International; Case No. 0307886; In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, General Jurisdiction Division.

     In December 2003, the Company entered into an agreement in principle to settle the Consumer Lawsuit and the above individual related lawsuits. A settlement agreement pertaining specifically to the Consumer Lawsuit was filed with the court on March 2, 2004. On October 28, 2004, the Court entered an order approving the settlement. Subject to appeal, all claims under the Consumer Lawsuit have been dismissed. The terms of the proposed settlement call for the Company to make payments totaling approximately $100,000 in settlement of these claims. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had recorded reserves of $100,000 relating to this matter. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recognized a receivable of $25,000 for expected recoveries under one primary layer of the Company’s insurance coverage related to the litigation. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company deposited $100,000 into escrow for this proposed settlement. This amount is included in Other current assets with a corresponding liability in Accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

     On April 21, 2002, additional plaintiffs filed a lawsuit styled Sol Guralnick, Linda Weinr, Joan Nix, Gilda Schwartz, Paul Schwartz, Ann Ferrante, Steve Schwartz, Nancy Backlund, Jamie Osit, Corey King, Marc King, Barbara Feinberg Clark v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Menorah Gardens and Funeral Chapels and Service Corporation International; In the Circuit Court in the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida; Case number CA024815AE (Guralnick Lawsuit), making essentially the same allegations as the Consumer Lawsuit with the exception that it does not contain class allegations. In addition to the Guralnick Lawsuit, counsel filed a lawsuit containing cemetery mismanagement allegations styled Diane Wolff, Arlene Benowitz, Michael Wolff, Randee Wolff Blumstein, and Martha Freedberg v. SCI, Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. a Florida corporation d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels, Service Corporation International, a Texas Corporation, Menorah Partnership, a Florida General Partnership, and Sharon Gardens Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership; In the Circuit Court in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case No. 2003CA013025 (Wolff Lawsuit).

     In October 2004, the Company reached an agreement for settlement of the Guralnick and Wolff Lawsuits.

      Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation International, et al; Civil Action 04-MD-1609; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three lawsuits— Edgar Neufeld v. Service Corporation International, et.al,; Cause No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL; In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation International, et. al .; Cause No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL; In the United States District for the District of Nevada; and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation International, et. al.; Cause No. 04-CV-20114; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants the Company and three of the

27


Table of Contents

Company’s current and former executive officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class action filed in connection with the circumstances surrounding the Consumer Lawsuit. The plaintiffs allege that the Company failed to disclose, or falsely stated, material information relating to the circumstances surrounding the Consumer Lawsuit. Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no discovery has occurred, and the Company cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages. The Company intends to aggressively defend itself in the 2003 Securities Lawsuit.

      David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation International. ; In the County Court of El Paso, County, Texas, County Court at Law Number Three; Cause Number 2002-740 (Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit is a putative class action brought on behalf of all persons, entities and organizations who purchased funeral services from the Company or its subsidiaries at any time since March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas funeral related rules (Rules) required the Company to disclose its markups on all items obtained from third parties in connection with funeral service contracts and that the failure to make required disclosures of markups resulted in fraud and other legal claims. The Company believes that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of the Rules is incorrect. The Hijar Lawsuit seeks to recover an unspecified amount of monetary damages. The plaintiffs’ counsel has pursued two arbitration claims raising similar issues in California. The Company has recently filed a complaint for declaratory relief in Federal District Court for the Central District of California relating to these arbitration claims.

     Each side in the Hijar Lawsuit filed motions to summarily establish that its interpretation of the Rules was correct, and the judge has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. This ruling allows the plaintiffs to proceed with the case. No class has been certified.

     The International Cemetery and Funeral Association, the Texas Funeral Directors Association, the National Funeral Directors Association, the National Funeral Directors and Morticians Association, Inc., the Texas Funeral Service Commission, and three industry competitors filed Amicus Curiae briefs asserting that their interpretation of the Rules was the same as the defendants. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission provided the Company with an informal staff opinion supporting the defendants’ argument.

     The ultimate outcome of the Hijar Lawsuit cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company intends to aggressively defend this lawsuit.

     During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, the Company accrued approximately $9,000 for litigation related matters described in this note twelve. The Company has substantial face amount of insurance coverage which it believes is applicable to these litigation related matters. There are various unresolved coverage issues relative to such insurance, and the Company is currently involved in litigation with certain of its insurance carriers regarding these matters. For that reason, the Company has not accrued an estimated receivable for insurance recoveries other than the $25,000 receivable recorded in the fourth quarter of 2003 as described above. Such receivables are recorded when they are probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated.

     No assurance can be given regarding the ultimate outcome of these proceedings. Certain insurance policies held by the Company may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse outcome of these litigation related matters. If an adverse decision in these matters exceeds the insurance coverage or if the insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or if an insurance carrier is unable to pay, an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

13. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other obligations to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings.

28


Table of Contents

     A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations is presented below:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
            (Restated           (Restated
            note 17)           note 17)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effects of accounting changes (numerator):
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effects of accounting changes – basic
  $ 12,292     $ (5,391 )   $ 100,141     $ 52,657  
After tax interest on convertible debt
                6,419        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effects of accounting changes – diluted
  $ 12,292     $ (5,391 )   $ 106,560     $ 52,657  
Net income (loss) (numerator):
                               
Net income (loss) – basic
  $ 12,576     $ (4,732 )   $ 87,455     $ 54,662  
Interest on convertible debt
                6,419        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss) – diluted
  $ 12,576     $ (4,732 )   $ 93,874     $ 54,662  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Shares (denominator):
                               
Shares – basic
    336,590       300,507       315,656       299,221  
Stock options
    3,588             4,143       621  
Restricted stock
    37             48        
Convertible debt
                29,047        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Shares – diluted
    340,215       300,507       348,894       299,842  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share before cumulative effects of accounting changes:
                               
Basic
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .32     $ .18  
Diluted
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .31     $ .18  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss) per share:
                               
Basic
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .28     $ .18  
Diluted
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .27     $ .18  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes outstanding stock options and convertible debt in certain periods in which the inclusion of such items would be antidilutive in the periods presented. Total options and convertible debt not currently included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share are as follows:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Antidilutive options
    13,436       20,151       10,204       24,067  
Antidilutive convertible debt
    1,012       46,702       859       47,276  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total common stock equivalents excluded from computation
    14,448       66,853       11,063       71,343  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

14. Stockholders’ Equity

Stock Options

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation expense under the intrinsic value method. Under this method, no compensation expense is recognized on stock options if the grant price equals the market value on the date of grant.

29


Table of Contents

     If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for its option plans based on the fair value method, net income and per share amounts would have changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below.

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
            (Restated           (Restated
            note 17)           note 17)
Net income (loss)
  $ 12,576     $ (4,732 )   $ 87,455     $ 54,662  
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax expense
    (806 )     (2,230 )     (2,407 )     (6,730 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma net income (loss)
  $ 11,770     $ (6,962 )   $ 85,048     $ 47,932  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .28     $ .18  
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax expense
    (.00 )     (.00 )     (.01 )     (.02 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .27     $ .16  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .27     $ .18  
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax expense
    (.00 )     (.00 )     (.01 )     (.02 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ .04     $ (.02 )   $ .26     $ .16  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     The fair value of the Company’s stock options used to compute the pro forma net income and per share disclosures is determined by calculating the estimated fair value at grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:

                                 
    Foreign   Minimum           Accumulated
    currency   pension   Unrealized   other
    translation   liability   gains   comprehensive
    adjustment
  adjustment
  and losses
  loss
Balance at December 31, 2003
  $ (78,084 )   $ (33,599 )   $     $ (111,683 )
Activity in 2004
    (25,427 )     33,599             8,172  
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with available-for-sale securities of the trusts
                (63,894 )     (63,894 )
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable to the non-controlling interest holders
                63,894       63,894  
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net income
    49,006                   49,006  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at September 30, 2004
  $ (54,505 )   $     $     $ (54,505 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2002
  $ (170,591 )   $ (36,555 )   $     $ (207,146 )
Activity in 2003
    61,883                   61,883  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at September 30, 2003
  $ (108,708 )   $ (36,555 )   $     $ (145,263 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

30


Table of Contents

     The reclassification adjustment of $49,006 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 relates to the sale of 75% of the Company’s interest in its French operations. Included in the Foreign currency translation adjustment at September 30, 2004 are net currency losses of $67,326 related to discontinued operations of the Company’s Argentina operations held for sale at September 30, 2004.

     The components of Comprehensive income are as follows:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
            (Restated           (Restated
            note 17)           note 17)
Comprehensive income:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 12,576     $ (4,732 )   $ 87,455     $ 54,662  
Total other comprehensive income
    16,978       16,321       57,178       61,883  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Comprehensive income
  $ 29,554     $ 11,589     $ 144,633     $ 116,545  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Share Repurchase Program

On August 16, 2004, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100,000 to repurchase its common stock. The Company, subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions, makes purchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During the third quarter of 2004, the Company repurchased 5,612 shares of common stock at a cost of $34,812.

15. Gains and Impairment (Losses) on Dispositions and Other Operating Expenses

Gains and Impairment (Losses) on Dispositions for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the income statement line item Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net . Additionally, as dispositions occur related to the Company’s ongoing asset sale programs, adjustments are made through this income statement line item to reflect the difference between actual proceeds received from the sale compared to the original estimates.

      Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net consists of the following:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Gains on dispositions, net
  $ 1,022     $ 7,808     $ 59,433     $ 21,148  
Impairment losses for assets held for sale
    (6,486 )     (13,327 )     (28,580 )     (27,706 )
Changes to previously estimated impairment losses
    2,183       4,067       2,165       11,971  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ (3,281 )   $ (1,452 )   $ 33,018     $ 5,413  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Previous Years’ Charges

The Company’s previous years’ charges (in 2002, 2001 and 1999) included severance costs related to cost rationalization programs and terminated contractual relationships of former employees and executive officers, planned divestitures of certain North America and international funeral service and cemetery businesses, reductions in carrying values of equity investments, market value adjustments for certain options associated with the Company’s senior notes and relieving certain individuals from their consulting and/or covenant-not-to-compete contractual obligations.

     The majority of the remaining balance at September 30, 2004 of these original charge amounts relate to severance costs on completed actions and terminated consulting and/or covenant-not-to-compete contractual obligations, which will be paid by 2012. Of the $34,082 remaining liability at September 30, 2004, $10,564 is included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $23,518 is

31


Table of Contents

included in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet based on the expected timing of payments. The Company continues to adjust the estimates of certain items included in the original charge amounts as better estimates become available or actual divestitures occur.

     The activity related to these previous years’ charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is detailed below. Any adjustments made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 to the original impairment charge amounts were recognized in the income statement line item Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net , as described above.

                                         
                    Utilization for nine    
                    months ended    
                    September 30, 2004
   
    Original charge   Balance at                   Balance at
    amount
  December 31, 2003
  Cash
  Non-cash
  September 30, 2004
Fourth Quarter 1999 Charge
  $ 272,544     $ 18,282     $ 5,364     $ 60     $ 12,858  
2001 Charges
    663,548       3,102       380       811       1,911  
2002 Charges
    292,979       24,395       4,907       175       19,313  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 1,229,071     $ 45,779     $ 10,651     $ 1,046     $ 34,082  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Sale of French Operations

On March 11, 2004, the Company completed a joint venture transaction of its funeral operations in France. In addition to maintaining a 25% share of the total equity capital of the newly formed entity, the Company received net cash proceeds of $287,886, net of transaction costs, and a note receivable in the amount of EUR 10,000. The transaction resulted in a pretax gain of $12,639, recorded in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net , in the consolidated statement of operations, and a non-cash tax benefit of $24,929, which were recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In July 2004, the Company paid $6,318, pursuant to the joint venture agreement, as a purchase price adjustment for the sale of its French operations, which reduced the pretax gain to $6,420 and the after tax gain to $33,624. Included in the pretax gain, the Company recognized $35,768 of contractual obligations related to representation and warranties and other indemnifications resulting from the joint venture contract. Goodwill in the amount of $23,467 was removed from the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as a result of this transaction. For further information regarding the sale of its French operations, including pro forma financial information, see the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2004.

Proceeds from Investment in United Kingdom Company

During the second quarter of 2004, the Company received proceeds of $53,839 from the sale of its minority interest equity investment in the United Kingdom and the prepayment of its note receivable, with accrued interest, following a successful public offering transaction of its United Kingdom company.

     The Company recognized income of $27,179, recorded in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net , in the consolidated statement of operations as of March 31, 2004, to adjust the carrying amount of the receivable to its realizable value. In addition, the Company recognized interest income on the receivable, in the amount of $4,478 recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations as of March 31, 2004. In the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a pretax gain of $13,984 in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net in the consolidated statement of operations, as a result of the sale and recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $8,000.

16. Discontinued Operations

The Company committed to a plan during the second quarter of 2004 to divest its existing funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and Uruguay. The Company is actively marketing these operations. The Company plans to have no continuing interest in these operations subsequent to disposal of the Argentina and Uruguay businesses. Therefore, these operations were classified as discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2004.

Impairment of Argentina

During the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded an impairment of its funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina in the amount of $15,189 recorded in Loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations. The new carrying

32


Table of Contents

amount reflects the estimated fair value based on current market conditions less costs to sell. Additionally, the Company recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $49,236 in discontinued operations during the three months ended June 30, 2004. This tax benefit represents the reduction of a previously recorded valuation allowance.

     The results of the Company’s discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Revenues
  $ 1,225     $ 3,744     $ 8,534     $ 9,974  
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
          29       (15,189 )     979  
Other costs and expenses
    (800 )     (3,002 )     (6,785 )     (8,612 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes
    425       771       (13,440 )     2,341  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    141       112       (48,815 )     336  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income from discontinued operations
  $ 284     $ 659     $ 35,375     $ 2,005  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     Net (liabilities) and assets of discontinued operations at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were as follows:

                 
    September 30, 2004
  December 31, 2003
Assets:
               
Receivables, net of allowances
  $ 3,402     $ 4,096  
Other current assets
    2,406       2,005  
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
    1,399       1,601  
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net
    446       376  
Deferred charges and other assets
    2,495       1,240  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total assets
    10,148       9,318  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
    1,294       1,107  
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
    7,893       6,493  
Long-term debt
    9,174       9,694  
Deferred income taxes
    13,498       13,026  
Other liabilities and deferred credits
    46,975       31,210  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total liabilities
    78,834       61,530  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net liabilities of discontinued operations
    (68,686 )     (52,212 )
Foreign currency translation
    67,326       71,001  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net (liabilities) assets of discontinued operations, net of foreign currency translation
  $ (1,360 )   $ 18,789  
 
   
 
     
 
 

17. Restatement of Financial Statements

33


Table of Contents

The Company restated its previously issued financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, the interim quarters of 2000, 2001 and 2002, and the first three quarters of 2003, related to adjustments to Deferred preneed cemetery revenues and changes in the methodology for amortizing preneed funeral deferred selling costs. See the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2003 for complete disclosures relating to this restatement of the Company’s financial statements. All applicable amounts relating to these restatements have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements.

     The effect of the restatement on the Company’s previously reported consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was as follows:

                                 
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
    As Reported
  As Restated
  As Reported
  As Restated
2003                                
Revenues
  $ 567,357     $ 566,461     $ 1,727,462     $ 1,729,337  
Costs and expenses
    499,789       497,515       1,454,790       1,450,801  
Gross profits
    67,568       68,946       272,672       278,536  
Operating income
    13,341       14,719       165,906       171,771  
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes
    (10,100 )     (8,722 )     76,608       82,472  
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
    (3,865 )     (3,331 )     27,541       29,815  
Net (loss) income
    (5,576 )     (4,732 )     51,072       54,662  
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic — EPS
    (.02 )     (.02 )     .17       .18  
Diluted — EPS
    (.02 )     (.02 )     .17       .18  

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is the world’s largest provider of funeral and cemetery services. At September 30, 2004, we operated 1,244 funeral service locations and 412 cemeteries. We also had a minority interest equity investment in funeral operations in France. In addition to our funeral and cemetery operations, we own Kenyon International Emergency Services, a disaster response team that engages in mass fatality and emergency response services.

     Our funeral and cemetery operations are organized into a North America division covering the United States and Canada, and a Foreign division including operations in South America, Germany and Singapore. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, our North America operations represented approximately 97% of our consolidated revenues and consolidated gross profits.

     Our operations in the North America division are organized into 32 major markets and 44 middle markets. Each market is led by a market director with responsibility for funeral and cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the funeral homes and cemeteries realize efficiencies by sharing common resources such as personnel, preparation services and vehicles. There are three market support centers in North America to assist market directors with financial, administrative and human resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston, New York and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the market support centers are to help facilitate the execution of corporate strategies, coordinate communications between the field and corporate offices and serve as liaisons for implementation of policies and procedures.

Strengths and Challenges

SCI is the leading provider of funeral, cremation and cemetery services in North America. While there are four other publicly-traded companies that operate in our industry, we have more funeral homes and cemeteries and serve more consumers than the rest of the public peer group combined. Despite some consolidation, the industry remains fragmented. We estimate that the other three public companies and SCI combined generate approximately 20% of total industry revenue. The other 80% is generated by independent funeral and cemetery operators.

34


Table of Contents

     In 2000, we launched the first national branding strategy in the funeral service industry in North America under the name Dignity Memorial ® . While this branding process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names associated with acquired locations generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity Memorial ® provider. We believe SCI is the only company in our industry that has successfully implemented a national brand. We believe that a national brand gives us a competitive advantage. This is discussed further in our strategies for growth described below.

     Our core business can be described as stable. It has favorable demographic characteristics due to the aging of America. It also has relatively predictable revenue and cash flow streams. This stability is enhanced by a large backlog of deferred revenues associated with North America preneed funeral and cemetery sales. However, we and others in the industry face certain challenges in growing revenues. The primary external factors affecting revenue growth are a lack of near-term expansion in the number of deaths and an increasing trend toward cremation. Although the United States Census Bureau projects that the numbers of deaths will grow between 0.7% and 0.8% annually through 2010, modern advances in medicine and healthier lifestyles could reduce the numbers of deaths during this time.

     In North America, social trends, religious changes, environmental issues and cultural preferences are driving an increasing preference for cremation. SCI is the largest provider of cremation services in North America. Approximately 40% of the total funeral services we perform are cremation services as compared to the national average of approximately 30%. Our cremation mix is greater due to the high concentration of properties we own along the west coast of the United States, Florida, and Arizona where cremation rates exceed 45%. The rate of cremation in North America has been increasing approximately 100 to 150 basis points each year and we expect this trend to continue in the near term. Cremation services historically have generated less revenue and gross profit dollars than traditional funeral services. Additionally, the cremation consumer may choose not to purchase cemetery property or merchandise. We believe we are well positioned to respond to this trend and have experienced initial success through the use of contemporary marketing strategies and unique product and service offerings that specifically appeal to cremation consumers. See the further discussion regarding initiatives to address cremation as part of our overall revenue growth strategy described below.

The Path to Growth

We have made substantial progress in reducing debt and improving cash flow since 1999. Our current capital structure and liquidity afford us significant financial flexibility. Our primary focus has now shifted to initiatives that will grow revenues and earnings. In the near term, we believe that cost reduction efforts will be the main means to improve earnings. We believe strategies centered on our national brand, Dignity Memorial ® , and other revenue growth initiatives can provide the framework for sustainable growth over the longer term.

Improving the Infrastructure

Historically we have had an infrastructure that did not allow us to realize fully the inherent efficiencies of our business organization. As a result, we were unable to enjoy all of the benefits of standardization, technology, and process improvement. Recently we have been moving to capitalize more fully on the inherent economies of scale of our business by reformulating our infrastructure. This has been accomplished by redesigning our sales organization, improving business and financial processes, outsourcing certain of our accounting functions including accounts payable and payroll, and expanding our existing trust administration and information technology outsourcing programs. We also began to implement a new information system in our field locations. This new system will replace three separate contract entry systems and integrate these functions into one.

     Having simplified our sales approach and redesigned our financial, technical and administrative infrastructure, we were able to make significant changes to the field management structure in late 2003. The former management structure consisted of multiple layers and two organizations (sales and operations). The new management structure is based on a major market and middle market concept with the understanding that our markets and businesses are not all the same and can benefit from different management approaches. We eliminated the dual management organizational structure, and now have one person responsible for each market who has the ability to lead in a multi-segment environment. This individual is charged with the responsibility of growing our business and maintaining a commitment to the Dignity Memorial ® standards and brand.

35


Table of Contents

Building the Brand

SCI implemented the first national brand in the funeral service industry. This brand is called Dignity Memorial ® . Internally, we are focused on ensuring that we have consistency in service standards and processes across our network of businesses. We want every customer interaction to be the standard “Dignity” interaction, which is based upon values of integrity, respect, enduring relationships and service excellence. Externally, we continue to enhance signage and local advertising efforts using the Dignity ® name and logo, and we also sponsor several nationally recognized community programs. In 2003, we initiated a national advertising and marketing program to build awareness of our national brand name. Through broadcast and cable television, newspapers, yellow pages and direct mail media, this program focuses on the distinct benefits and values that set Dignity Memorial ® apart from other providers.

     Based on our market studies, we believe today’s funeral consumers are less interested in traditional funeral products and more interested in creating a life celebration experience as well as receiving professional help to deal with the administrative and legal challenges which occur when a loved one dies. Through our Dignity ® brand we are developing more contemporary and comprehensive products and services that we believe will help the consumer through the entire experience. Some of the exclusive items offered through Dignity ® providers include grief counseling services, legal services, internet memorial archive capabilities, and the Aftercare ® Planner — a comprehensive organizing system that helps families manage the many business details that arise after a death occurs. Dignity ® benefits also include the Bereavement Travel Program, a unique feature that allows customers to obtain special rates on airfare, car rentals and hotel accommodations for family and friends who must travel from out of town to attend funeral, cremation or memorial services. Importantly, these products and services appeal to both burial and cremation consumers. We are also focusing on programs that offer consumers new ways to personalize funeral services and create value in the experience.

Growing Our Revenues

As described earlier, we believe improvements in our cost structure will increase earnings in the near term; however, we also realize that to achieve sustainable long-term earnings growth, we must also increase our revenues. We believe we can be successful in this regard by developing the Dignity ® brand and listening to our customers.

Enhancing Sales Opportunities

We believe we can grow core revenues by utilizing technology and contemporary marketing techniques to enhance our sales opportunities and strengthen the competitive advantage of our national brand name. In this regard, particular focus is being placed on selling Dignity Memorial ® packaged funeral and cremation plans. We are also developing product differentiation within our cemeteries and enhancing our cremation strategies.

     Our national brand name also represents a unique set of packaged funeral and cremation plans offered exclusively through our network on an atneed and preneed basis. These packages are designed to simplify customer decision-making and include the unique value-added products and services described earlier which have traditionally been unavailable through funeral service locations. Our customer satisfaction index, as measured by independent surveys completed by consumers three weeks following a funeral, continues to reach record levels, which we believe are largely attributable to the value and savings consumers receive when they select a Dignity ® package. We believe we can increase the selection rate of these packaged plans through improved merchandising strategies that place less emphasis on traditional funeral merchandise and more focus on the comprehensive product and service offerings unique to Dignity Memorial ® providers.

     We are also beginning to use more contemporary marketing techniques within our cemetery segment. Initiatives are underway to employ a tiered-product model that emphasizes a wide range of product and service offerings. We are particularly focusing on the development of high-end cemetery property projects such as private family estates. We believe this initiative will be a key driver of cemetery revenue growth in 2005.

     To grow core revenues and profits, we believe we must capitalize on the opportunities provided by the growing cremation trend. We believe a successful cremation strategy is built on product differentiation, personalization and simplicity. Along with the sale of

36


Table of Contents

Dignity Memorial ® cremation plans, we are developing new displays to be used in the arrangement process that clearly explain the products and services available to cremation consumers. Within the cemetery segment, we are promoting cremation gardens, which are separate sections located within certain of our cemeteries where cremated remains can be permanently placed and that contain other unique memorialization products. We continue to develop our national brand, National Cremation ® , which targets the direct cremation consumer. And finally, comprehensive training programs are being developed to support these key initiatives, as well as to focus on creating a personal and meaningful experience for the cremation consumer.

Increasing Market Share

We believe that SCI has opportunities to grow market share due to its size and geographic diversity. We believe that a national brand name will provide us access to new customers over the long term given the increasingly mobile nature of North Americans. In addition, we will continue to capitalize on our nationwide network of providers to develop affinity relationships with large groups of individuals to whom we can market our products and services. Such relationships include employers, social organizations and insurance companies. Our most strategic affinity partnership today is with the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Ladies Auxiliary whose membership exceeds two million. Over the longer term, we believe such groups can be a key influence in the funeral home selection process.

     In late 2003, we eliminated the dual management structures of sales and operations and replaced them with a single-line business management structure. In addition to reducing costs, our new structure is intended to have our strongest business managers focused on producing results in each of our markets. Under the new structure, many of the administrative and financial functions are now handled by support centers. The geographical scope of responsibility of these managers has also been narrowed. We believe this new structure allows for greater focus on developing people, growing market share and improving profitability.

     We are also targeting expansion through acquisition or construction in the top 150 markets in North America where probable investment returns will exceed our cost of capital. We will focus future growth capital deployment in the major metropolitan markets where there is a large population base and where multiple businesses are more conducive to clustering and contemporary marketing strategies and where it is easier to attract quality management. Over the longer term, the potential for a franchising opportunity exists for further expansion in the smaller markets.

Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Changes

Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. Estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting measurements. The following discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates should be read in conjunction with our current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

     In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reached consensus on the guidance provided by Emerging Issues Task force Issue 03-1 (“EITF 03-1”), “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” The guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within the scope of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities: and Certain Other Investments.” EITF 03-1 specifies that an impairment would be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. EITF 03-1 was scheduled to be effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. The measurement and recognition provisions relating to debt and equity securities have been delayed until the FASB issues additional guidance. We adopted the disclosure provisions during the period ended June 30, 2004. The adoption of the measurement and recognition provisions will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, result of operations or liquidity.

Variable Interest Entities

37


Table of Contents

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51.” This interpretation clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In December 2003, the FASB revised FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46R).

     Under the provisions of FIN 46R, we are required to consolidate certain cemeteries and trusts. Merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are variable interest entities because the trusts meet the conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1) of FIN 46R. That is, as a group, the equity investors (if any) do not have sufficient equity at risk and do not have the direct or indirect ability through voting or similar rights to make decisions about the trusts’ activities that have a significant effect on the success of the trusts. FIN 46R requires us to consolidate merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts for which we are the primary beneficiary (i.e., those for which we absorb a majority of the trusts’ expected losses). We are the primary beneficiary of a trust whenever a majority of the assets of the trust are attributable to deposits of our customers.

Consolidation of Trusts: We implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, which resulted in the consolidation of our preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts. We did not recognize a cumulative effect of an accounting change as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R, as it relates to the consolidation of our trusts. The implementation of FIN 46R affects certain line items on our consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as described below; however, there will be no impact to net income in the statement of operations as a result of the implementation. Additionally, the implementation of FIN 46R did not result in any net changes to our consolidated statement of cash flows; however, it does require certain financing and investing activities to be disclosed.

     Although FIN 46R requires consolidation of most of the merchandise and service and perpetual care trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and our customers. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, the customers are the legal beneficiaries. In the case of cemetery perpetual care trusts, we do not have a legal right to the perpetual care trust assets. For these reasons, upon consolidation of the trusts, we recognize non-controlling interests in its financial statements to reflect third party interests in these trusts in accordance with FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liability and Equity” (SFAS 150). We classify deposits to merchandise and service trusts as non-controlling liability interests and classify deposits to cemetery perpetual care trusts as non-controlling equity interests.

     We record cash received from customers that has not been deposited in trusts as restricted cash in Deferred charges and other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. At September 30, 2004, these pending deposits totaled $10.8 million. We continue to account for amounts received from customers prior to delivery of merchandise or services that are not required to be deposited in merchandise and service trusts as deferred revenue.

     Beginning March 31, 2004, we recognize net realized investment earnings of the merchandise and service trusts and perpetual care trusts, as well as the related trustee investment expenses and taxes, within Other income, net . We then recognize a corresponding expense within Other income, net representing the net realized earnings of those trusts that are attributable to the non-controlling interest holders. The corresponding credit for this expense is reflected in our consolidated balance sheet in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts for merchandise and service trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts for cemetery perpetual care trusts. The sum of these expenses recorded in Other income, net offset the net realized earnings of such trusts also recognized within Other income, net . Accordingly, net income in the consolidated statement of operations is not affected by consolidation of the trusts in accordance with FIN 46R.

     To the extent the earnings of the trusts are distributed prior to the delivery of merchandise and/or services, a corresponding amount of non-controlling interest is reclassified to deferred revenue, until the corresponding revenues are recognized. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, we recognize as revenues, amounts previously attributed to non-controlling interests and deferred revenues upon the performance of services and delivery of merchandise, including earnings accumulated in these trusts. In the case of the cemetery perpetual care trusts, distributable earnings are recognized in cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs.

     Prior to the implementation of FIN 46R and the consolidation of the trusts, monies received from customers and deposited into merchandise and service trusts until maturity of the preneed contract were recorded as receivables due from trust assets. Upon

38


Table of Contents

implementation of FIN 46R, we replaced receivables due from trust assets with the trust assets, at market, to the extent we were required to consolidate the trusts.

     An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contract that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust assets, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust assets. As such, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R.

     Both the merchandise and services trusts and the cemetery perpetual care trusts hold investments in marketable securities that we classify as available-for-sale under the requirements of SFAS 115. In accordance with SFAS 115, available-for-sale securities of the trusts are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and initially recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheet. Using the guidance in EITF Topic D-41, Adjustments in Assets and Liabilities for Holding Gains and Losses as Related to the Implementation of FASB Statement No. 115 (“Topic D-41”), unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities of the trusts attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are not recorded as Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) , but are recorded as an adjustment to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts . Therefore, unrealized gains and losses attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts . The gross effect from applying Topic D-41 on our Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is disclosed in note fourteen in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. However, our Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the face of the balance sheet is ultimately not affected by consolidation of the trusts.

     For additional discussion of our accounting policies after the implementation of FIN 46R, see notes four through seven to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Consolidation of Certain Cemeteries: Additionally, effective as of March 31, 2004, we consolidated certain cemeteries that we manage in accordance with FIN 46R. We recognized an after tax charge of $14.5 million, representing the cumulative effect of an accounting change, as a result of consolidating these cemeteries. The results of operations and cash flows of these cemeteries are included in our consolidated statements of operations and cash flows beginning March 31, 2004. Excluding the cumulative effect of accounting change, the effect of consolidating these entities did not have a significant effect on our reported results of operations.

Insurance Funded Preneed Insurance Contracts

We changed our method of accounting for insurance funded preneed contracts as we have concluded that our insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not assets and liabilities as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6, “Elements in Financial Statements.” Therefore, we have removed from our consolidated balance sheet amounts relating to insurance funded preneed funeral contracts previously recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and Deferred preneed funeral revenues , which at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, were $2.2 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively. The removal of these amounts did not have an impact on our consolidated stockholders’ equity, results of operations or cash flows. See note four to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and the preneed funeral and cemetery activities in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for additional information on insurance related preneed funeral contracts.

Pension Plans

Effective January 1, 2004, we changed the accounting for gains and losses on our pension plan assets and liabilities. In 2004, we began recognizing such gains and losses in our consolidated statement of operations during the year in which they occur. Prior to January 1, 2004, we amortized the difference between actual and expected investment returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier recognition). We believe the change is preferable as the new method of accounting better reflects the economic nature of our pension plan and recognizes gains and losses on the pension plan assets and liabilities in the year the gains and losses occur. As a result of this accounting method change, we recorded a charge for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $33.6 million (net of $21.3 million of deferred taxes) as of January 1, 2004. This amount represents accumulated unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and liabilities.

39


Table of Contents

     Under our new accounting method, our pension expense in future periods may be more volatile as this method accelerates recognition of actual experience. In addition, for our interim financial statements, we record net pension expense or income reflecting estimated returns on plan assets and obligations. We recognize actual gains and losses on plan assets and obligations as actuarial information becomes available upon review of the annual remeasurement.

     Our pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based on certain assumptions, including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and the discount rate used to compute future benefit obligations. As our pension plans have been frozen, participants do not earn additional benefits from additional years of service and we do not incur new service costs subsequent to 2000. The key drivers of pension cost are the discount rate used to determine the projected benefit obligation, the related interest cost and the rate of return on plan assets.

Discount Rate — It is our policy to use a discount rate comparable to rates of return on high-quality fixed income investments available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the Company’s pension benefits. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the obligation is adjusted annually based on prevailing interest rates as of the measurement date, which is September 30. In 2003, we lowered the discount rate used to determine the pension obligation from 7.00% to 6.25% based on the lower interest rate environment. For the 2004 interim periods prior to September 30, 2004, we used a discount rate of 6.25%. However, following the review of the annual remeasurement, we lowered the discount rate used to determine the pension obligation from 6.25% to 6.00%.

Return on Plan Assets – In 2003, we used a 9.0% assumed rate of return on plan assets as a result of a high allocation of equity securities within the plan assets. At December 31, 2003, 74% of the plan assets were equity securities with the remaining 26% of plan assets being represented by fixed income securities. After the $20 million voluntary infusion of funds into the plan in March 2004, we rebalanced the plan assets to have a lower percentage invested in traditional equity securities and fixed income securities and instead incorporate investments in market neutral hedge funds. As of September 30, 2004, approximately 54% of plan assets were invested in core diversified and market neutral hedge funds, 33% of the plan assets were equity securities and the remaining 13% of plan assets were fixed income securities. We believe that this reallocation will reduce the volatility with limited reduction of returns.

Results of Operations – Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

In the following discussion of results of operations, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial presentation with no effect on previously reported net income, financial condition or cash flows.

     Consolidated revenues in the third quarter of 2004 declined $163.1 million, primarily attributable to the disposition of our French funeral operations, which were joint ventured on March 11, 2004. In the three months ended September 30, 2003, revenues from funeral operations in France were $148.4 million. Consolidated gross profits decreased only $0.7 million despite the loss of profit from France, which was $16.1 million in 2003. Excluding our French operations, gross profit grew due to increased profitability in North America operations.

     Revenues from comparable North American businesses declined by $10.5 million or 2.6% due to declines in other funeral revenue and expected decreased revenues from cemetery development projects. Gross profits from comparable North America funeral and cemetery businesses rose 33.2% or $16.7 driven by cost reductions as described below.

     Net income was $12.6 million or $.04 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2004 compared to a net loss of $4.7 million or $.02 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2003. Earnings in 2003 benefited from $.03 per diluted share, or $10.0 million, related to our funeral operations in France which were subsequently divested in March 2004. Results in both periods also included items such as litigation expenses, losses on dispositions, other income and discontinued operations as follows:

      Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 (all amounts are after tax):

      • We recognized expenses of $5.2 million or $.02 per diluted share associated with outstanding litigation matters.
 
      • We recognized a net loss on dispositions of $1.8 million or less than $.01 per diluted share.
 
      • Discontinued operations contributed net earnings of $0.3 million or less than $.01 per diluted share.

40


Table of Contents

      Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 (all amounts are after tax):

      • We recognized expenses of $19.8 million or $.07 per diluted share related to outstanding litigation matters.
 
      • We recognized a net gain on corporate investments in other income of $2.6 million or $.01 per diluted share.
 
      • We recognized a net loss on dispositions of $0.9 million or less than $.01 per diluted share.
 
      • Discontinued operations contributed net earnings of $0.7 million or less than $.01 per diluted share.

North America Comparable Operating Results – Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

The following table summarizes the North America comparable operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. Comparable North America operations represented approximately 97% of consolidated revenues and approximately 98% of consolidated gross profits during the third quarter of 2004. Comparable financial information excludes operations that have been divested, acquired or constructed during the period January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004, and are meant to be reflective of “same store” results of operations.

                                 
    Three Months Ended      
    September 30,
  Increase    
    2004
  2003
  (Decrease)
  Percentage
            (Restated                
            note 17)                
Funeral
                               
Revenues
  $ 262.0     $ 265.2     $ (3.2 )     (1.2 )%
Gross Profits
  $ 44.3     $ 38.6     $ 5.7       14.8 %
Gross Margin
    16.9 %     14.6 %                
                               
Funeral Services Performed
    59,292       60,966       (1,674 )     (2.7 )%
Average Revenue Per Funeral Service
  $ 4,289     $ 4,174     $ 115       2.8 %
                               
Cemetery
                               
Revenues
  $ 127.7     $ 135.0     $ (7.3 )     (5.4 )%
Gross Profits
  $ 22.7     $ 11.7     $ 11.0       94.0 %
Gross Margin
    17.8 %     8.7 %                

      In millions, except funeral services performed and average revenue per funeral service .

Funeral

Funeral revenues declined $3.2 million in the quarter predominantly due to a decrease in other funeral service revenues. During the quarter, revenues from Kenyon, our disaster assistance subsidiary, declined $1.8 million. We also experienced a $1.2 million decline in general agency revenues associated with insurance funded prearranged funeral sales due to a shift in the mix of products sold.

     Operating funeral revenues were flat as an increase in the average revenue per funeral offset a decline in funeral volume. The number of funeral services performed in the third quarter declined 2.7%. On a year-to-date basis, the number of funeral services performed is down 0.7% compared to the first nine months of 2003 and is consistent with management’s guidance for the year.

     During the quarter, the average revenue per funeral service grew 2.8%. We continue to see a strong positive trend in the average revenue which is mainly a result of the expanded product and service offerings included in our Dignity Memorial ® funeral and

41


Table of Contents

cremation plans. The Dignity ® plans are focused on adding value for the consumer instead of relying on price increases. These plans offer consumers unique products and services aimed at providing assistance with administrative and legal issues, travel needs, emotional support, and memorialization when a death occurs. Because of these comprehensive value-added offerings, the packages generate significant incremental revenue per funeral service compared to non-Dignity sales.

     During the third quarter of 2004, 17.2% of the total funeral consumers served selected a Dignity Memorial ® plan compared to 16.9% in the third quarter of 2003. We are continuing to utilize technology and contemporary marketing techniques to enhance our sales opportunities and to strengthen the competitive advantage of our national brand, Dignity Memorial ® .

     Funeral results in the quarter were impacted by an increase in the rate of cremation. Of the total comparable funeral services performed in the third quarter of 2004, 39.8% were cremation services versus 38.9% in the same period of 2003. In spite of this increased mix of cremation services, we are pleased with our continued ability to consistently deliver meaningful growth in the overall average revenue per funeral service.

     Funeral gross profits increased 14.8% or $5.7 million and the gross margin percentage rose to 16.9% compared to 14.6%. This improvement is primarily a result of reductions in overhead and pension costs which were partially offset by declines in other revenue described above.

Cemetery

North America cemetery revenue decreased $7.3 million or 5.4% in the third quarter of 2004. Consistent with guidance given for 2004, revenues associated with cemetery development projects were down $7.3 million. Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred until it is constructed and a minimum of 10% of the sales price is collected from the customer. In 2003, there were unusually high levels of revenues associated with these property development projects as a result of completing projects from a backlog created in 1999 and 2000 when our cash resources were limited. In 2004, we are experiencing more normal levels of revenues related to these completed construction projects.

     Atneed revenues grew $4.5 million consisting of increases in the sale of property and merchandise, partially offset by declines in revenues from services performed. Recognized preneed revenues (excluding new development projects) declined $9.2 million as increased revenues from property sales were offset by declines in merchandise deliveries and services performed.

     Other cemetery revenues improved by $4.8 million during the quarter led by increases in interest income from installment contracts and increases in cemetery perpetual care trust fund income.

     Cemetery gross profits nearly doubled despite a 5.4% decline in revenues. Cemetery gross profits grew $11.0 million and the gross margin percentage climbed to 17.8% compared to 8.7% in the prior period. This significant improvement is a result of reductions in all cemetery cost categories during the quarter, partially offset by the decline in cemetery construction revenues. Of particular note, overhead costs declined 29% due to changes in our management structure and total selling costs were down 28% as a result of changes to the compensation plans.

Overhead Expenses

In addition to corporate general and administrative expenses, there are two other components of overhead costs that are allocated to funeral and cemetery operations in North America: home office overhead and field overhead. These two overhead categories totaled $27.1 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared to $37.8 million in the same period of 2003 representing a decrease of $10.7 million or 28.3%. This decline in costs is a direct result of initiatives undertaken in 2003 to improve the management structure and to reduce our fixed costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

In the third quarter of 2004, general and administrative expenses declined $27.5 million to $25.3 million, predominantly associated with a decrease in litigation expenses and system amortization costs. In the third quarter of 2004, we recognized legal expenses (net of insurance recoveries) of $8.3 million compared to $32.0 million in the third quarter of 2003 related to outstanding litigation matters. Additionally, included in the third quarter of 2003 was $4.6 million of accelerated amortization expense that is not included in 2004. In 2002, we made the decision to implement new information systems and, therefore, accelerated the amortization of the old systems. These accelerated amortization costs ceased at the end of the third quarter of 2003 when amortization of the new systems commenced.

42


Table of Contents

     Excluding legal expenses and accelerated system amortization costs in both periods, general and administrative expenses increased less than $1 million. During the quarter we experienced increased professional fees of $1.8 million associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and $1.3 million of increased non-cash long-term compensation expenses; however, these increased expenses were offset primarily by reductions in information technology and other expenses.

Other Income and Expenses

In the third quarter of 2004, we recognized a net pretax loss of $3.3 million associated with dispositions compared to a net pretax loss of $1.5 million in 2003. These net losses are primarily associated with various dispositions in North America. For further information regarding gains and impairment losses on dispositions see footnote fifteen to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

     Interest expense was $6.9 million lower in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the third quarter of 2003 primarily due to the debt extinguishments in early 2004, including the early retirement of 6% notes due 2005, the repayment of 7.375% notes due 2004 and the conversion and redemption of 6.75% convertible notes due 2008.

     Other income declined $6.6 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 2003. Contributing to this decline was a decrease of $2.8 million in interest income and a decline of $1.1 million in net foreign currency and other gains. Also, included in 2003 was a $2.6 million net gain from corporate investments.

     The effective tax rate in the quarter was 24.9% and was favorably impacted by a $2.4 million benefit resulting from a change in estimated 2003 federal tax liabilities. Due to this benefit and tax benefits realized from certain international dispositions, we expect our effective tax rate for the year will be 11% to 15%.

     The diluted weighted average number of shares increased by approximately 40 million shares in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 2003 mainly due to the conversion in June 2004 of our convertible senior notes which resulted in the issuance of approximately 32 million shares. The remaining share increase is related to dilutive outstanding stock options and the Company’s contribution of common stock to its 401(k) retirement plan, partially offset by share repurchases.

Results of Operations – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, total consolidated revenues decreased $307.8 million primarily as a result of the joint venture of our funeral operations in France completed on March 11, 2004. Revenues from our businesses in France were $127.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $424.1 million in the same period of 2003, a decrease of $296.8 million.

     Consolidated gross profits declined $23.8 million mainly as a result of a $39.0 million decrease in gross profits contributed from France. Gross profits from our French operations were $11.6 million in the first nine months of 2004 versus $50.6 million in the same period of 2003. The loss of profits from businesses in France was partially offset by increased profitability in our North America funeral and cemetery businesses.

     Revenues from comparable North America funeral and cemetery businesses improved $3.3 million. Gross profits from comparable North America businesses grew 7.1% or $15.9 million, led by cost reductions.

     Net income was $87.5 million or $.27 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $54.7 million or $.18 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2003. Net income in the first nine months of 2004 included $8.1 million or $.02 per diluted share, related to our French business compared to $29.3 million or $.10 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2003. Results in both periods included items such as accounting changes, gains on dispositions, litigation expenses, gains and losses on the early extinguishment of debt and other income and expenses as follows:

      Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 (all amounts are after tax):

    We recorded a charge of $48.1 million (including an income tax benefit of $21.3 million) or $.14 per diluted share for the cumulative effect of accounting changes related to the implementation of FIN 46R and changes in pension accounting. For additional information regarding these accounting changes, see note three to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

43


Table of Contents

    We recognized a net gain on dispositions of $58.5 million (including tax benefits realized from the dispositions of our French operations and our minority interest in the United Kingdom) or $.18 per diluted share. For further information, see note fifteen to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
 
    We recognized expenses of $30.6 million or $.09 per diluted share associated with the proposed settlement of our securities class action lawsuit and other outstanding litigation matters. See note twelve to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
 
    We recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $10.5 million or $.03 per diluted share primarily related to the successful tender offer of our notes due 2005 and the redemption of our convertible notes due 2008.
 
    We recognized other operating income of $4.7 million or $.01 per diluted share as a result of various reconciling activities regarding our trust accounts and preneed backlogs.
 
    We recognized a foreign currency transactional loss reported in other expense of $2.3 million or $.01 per diluted share associated with the payment of a contingent purchase obligation in Chile.
 
    We recognized interest income reported in other income of $2.7 million or $.01 per diluted share related to interest income on a note receivable from the United Kingdom company in which we owned a minority interest.
 
    Discontinued operations reported net income of $35.4 million or $.10 per diluted share. This includes a non-cash benefit of $49.2 million which is expected to reduce cash taxes in future years.

      Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (all amounts are after tax):

    We incurred expenses of $29.1 million or $.09 per diluted share related to outstanding litigation matters.
 
    We recognized a net gain associated with dispositions of $3.4 million or $.01 per diluted share.
 
    We recognized a net gain on corporate investments of $2.6 million or $.01 per diluted share.
 
    We recognized a gain on the early extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million or less than $.01 per diluted share.
 
    We recognized other operating expenses of $1.1 million or less than $.01 per diluted share related to the termination of a lease contract.

    Discontinued operations contributed $2.0 million or less than $.01 per diluted share.

North America Comparable Operating Results – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

The following table summarizes the North America comparable operating results for the first nine months of 2004 and 2003. Comparable North America operations represented approximately 88% of consolidated revenues and approximately 94% of consolidated gross profits during the first nine months of 2004. Comparable financial information excludes operations that have been divested, acquired or constructed during the period January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004, and are meant to be reflective of “same store” results of operations.

                                 
    Nine months ended        
    September 30,
       
                    Increase    
    2004
  2003
  (Decrease)
  Percentage
            (Restated                
            note 17)                
Funeral
                               
Revenues
  $ 839.7     $ 833.0     $ 6.7       0.8 %
Gross Profits
  $ 171.2     $ 160.0     $ 11.2       7.0 %
Gross Margin
    20.4 %     19.2 %                
 
                               
Funeral Services Performed
    191,450       192,715       (1,265 )     (0.7 )%
Average Revenue Per Funeral Service
  $ 4,248     $ 4,154     $ 94       2.3 %
 
                               
Cemetery
                               
Revenues
  $ 413.5     $ 416.9     $ (3.4 )     (0.8 )%
Gross Profits
  $ 67.0     $ 62.3     $ 4.7       7.5 %
Gross Margin
    16.2 %     14.9 %                

      In millions, except funeral services performed and average revenue per funeral service

44


Table of Contents

Funeral

Comparable North America funeral revenues rose $6.7 million or 0.8% in the first nine months of 2004 compared to 2003 primarily driven by growth in the average revenue per funeral service. This increase was partially offset by declines in funeral volume, lower levels of general agency revenues, and decreased activity in Kenyon (our disaster assistance subsidiary).

     In the first nine months of 2004, the average revenue per funeral service increased by 2.3% compared to the same period in 2003. During the first nine months of 2004, approximately 17.2% of the total funeral consumers served selected a Dignity Memorial ® plan compared to 16.6% in the first nine months of 2003. Dignity Memorial ® funeral and cremation plans are designed to simplify the customer decision-making process and provide savings and value to consumers through unique products and services which have traditionally not been available through funeral service locations. In addition to improving customer satisfaction levels as measured by independent surveys, these packages also generate significant incremental revenue per funeral service compared to non-Dignity sales due to the comprehensive value-added offerings they provide.

     The number of funerals performed decreased by 0.7% and within management’s guidance for the full year. Of the total comparable funeral services performed, 40.0% were cremation services in the first nine months of 2004 compared to 39.1% in 2003.

     Funeral gross profits grew $11.2 million or 7.0% during the first nine months of 2004. The gross margin percentage improved to 20.4% versus 19.2% in the prior year period. This improvement in gross profits is primarily due to reduced overhead costs and increased revenues. Our targeted gross margin range for the full year of 2004 is 20% to 24%.

Cemetery

North America cemetery revenue decreased $3.4 million or less than 1% in the first nine months of 2004. As guided by management for the full year 2004, we experienced lower levels of revenues associated with new cemetery development projects. In the first nine months of 2004, recognition of revenues from constructed cemetery property declined by $10.8 million. Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred until it is constructed and a minimum of 10% of the sales price is collected from the customer. In 2003, there were unusually high levels of revenues associated with these property development projects as a result of completing projects from a backlog created in 1999 and 2000 when our cash resources were limited. In 2004, we are experiencing more normal levels of revenues related to these completed construction projects.

     Atneed revenues grew $19.8 million due to increases in the sale of property and merchandise. Recognized preneed revenues (excluding new development projects) declined $12.7 million as increased revenues from property sales were offset by declines in merchandise deliveries and services performed.

     Other cemetery revenues increased slightly during the first nine months of 2004. Declines in cemetery merchandise trust fund income were offset by increases in endowment care trust fund income, management fee income and interest income from installment contracts.

     Cemetery gross profits improved $4.7 million or 7.5%. The gross margin percentage grew to 16.2% compared to 14.9% in the prior period and is on the high end of our guidance range for 2004 of 13% to 17%. This improvement in gross profit is primarily a result of reductions in overhead costs, which were partially offset by the decline in construction revenues.

Overhead Expenses

Home office overhead and field overhead, which are allocated to funeral and cemetery operations in North America, totaled $87.3 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $114.7 million in the same period of 2003 representing a decrease of $27.4 million or 23.9%. This decline in costs is due to an improved management structure, and reduced expenses associated with various outsourcing programs and new information systems.

General and Administrative Expenses

45


Table of Contents

In the first nine months of 2004, general and administrative expenses declined $10.1 million to $100.3 million, primarily due to a decrease in system amortization costs. Included in the first nine months of 2003 was $13.8 million of accelerated amortization expense that is not included in 2004. In 2002, we made the decision to implement new information systems and, therefore, accelerated the amortization of the old systems. These accelerated amortization costs ceased at the end of the third quarter of 2003 when amortization of the new systems commenced.

     Litigation related costs are included in general and administrative expenses in both periods. In the first nine months of 2004, we recognized legal expenses of $48.3 million compared to $47.0 million in 2003. Legal expenses in 2004 are primarily related to the $35 million proposed settlement of outstanding securities litigation, net of $30 million funded directly into escrow by our insurance carriers. Legal expenses in 2003 are primarily related to a decision in an arbitration matter and litigation related matters in Florida.

     Excluding legal expenses and accelerated system amortization costs in both periods, general and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million. During the first nine months of 2004, we experienced $3.8 million of increased non-cash long-term compensation expenses primarily related to the appreciation of SCI’s common stock in 2004 and increased costs of $2.1 million associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. These increased expenses were offset primarily by reductions in information technology expenses and other professional fees.

Other Operating Income and Expenses

In 2003, we initiated projects to reconcile our consolidated trust assets and corresponding preneed deferred revenues primarily due to the implementation of the preneed component of our new information systems and the adoption of FIN 46R. As a result of these reconciliation projects, we recognized other operating income of $6.9 million in the first nine months of 2004, which represented an estimate of the total impact of these reconciling activities. We expect to finalize the funeral segment reconciliation project and make significant progress with the cemetery reconciliation project by the time we file our 2004 Form 10-K. While the final amount of any resulting adjustment will not be known until these projects are complete, we do not expect any material adjustments to our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows to result from the conclusion of these projects.

Other Income and Expenses

In the first nine months of 2004, we recognized a net pretax gain of $33.0 million predominantly related to gains from the joint venture of our French funeral operations and the sale of our minority interest in the United Kingdom company. These gains were partially offset by net losses associated with the dispositions of funeral and cemetery businesses and excess cemetery property in North America.

     Interest expense continued to decline during the period reflecting the success we have had in reducing outstanding debt. Interest expense was $13.3 million lower in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the first nine months of 2003 and will continue to decline due to the extinguishment of the Company’s 6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 following the conversion and redemption in June 2004.

     Other income declined $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to 2003. Included in 2004 was a $2.8 million foreign exchange currency transaction loss related to a contingent payment from the acquisition of our business in Chile. Also, included in 2003 was a $2.6 million net gain from corporate investments. These net declines were offset by an increase of $1.1 million of net foreign currency and other gains and a $0.4 million increase in interest income.

     The consolidated effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2004 was a benefit of 4.7% which included non-cash tax benefits realized from the joint venture of our business in France and the sale of our minority interest in the United Kingdom, as well as a $2.4 million tax benefit resulting from a change in estimated 2003 federal tax liabilities. This compares to an effective tax rate of 36.2% in the first nine months of 2003.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

46


Table of Contents

Our primary financial objectives are to capitalize on our financial flexibility and to continue generating strong operating cash flows. At the beginning of 2004, we had a goal of achieving a credit rating of “BB” with Standard and Poor’s (S&P) and “Ba2” with Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s). In July 2004, we achieved our targeted rating with S&P. In October 2004, Moody’s upgraded our rating to “Ba3”, one level below our target. In addition, Moody’s upgraded SCI to its highest Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of “SGL-1”. We believe these current ratings provide us with adequate access to obtain funds at a reasonable cost, if necessary.

     Internally generated cash flows are a significant source of liquidity for us. Based upon our year-to-date performance we believe we will be within our guidance range for operating cash flows (excluding non-recurring items) for the full year 2004 of $270 million to $310 million. As of September 30, 2004, our cash balance exceeded $300 million. We also have a new $200 million credit facility that was executed in August 2004. We have no cash borrowings under this credit facility, but have used it to support $72.5 million of letters of credit as of September 30, 2004. We believe these resources are adequate to meet our near and intermediate term debt obligations, planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements, as well as to have funds available for future growth.

     We expect to generate cash flows in the next several years above our operating and financing needs. We currently have less than $140 million in debt maturing during the remainder of 2004 and 2005. We believe that this financial flexibility coupled with our liquidity allows us to consider investments or capital structure related transactions that will enhance shareholder value. We will continue to evaluate internal opportunities such as construction of new funeral homes and development of high-end cemetery inventory. We expect to make acquisitions, if such acquisitions are available at reasonable market prices. Finally, we could consider a dividend or additional debt reductions depending on acceptable market conditions.

     On August 16, 2004, we announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100 million to repurchase our common stock. As of October 31, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 9.5 million shares at a total cost of approximately $59.4 million. We plan to continue to make purchases from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions.

     During the third quarter of 2004, we made our first strategic acquisition since 1999 for a total cash cost of $1.8 million. We will continue to look for attractive acquisition opportunities to complement our internal growth initiatives; however, we anticipate only modest activity due to elevated price expectations of potential sellers.

     We have other potential sources of cash that could be available to us in the future. We are continuing our program to divest of our international operations. In June 2004, management committed to a plan to divest of our businesses in Argentina and Uruguay. We also own funeral businesses in Germany and Singapore and a cemetery business in Chile that we will look to exit when market values and economic conditions are conducive to a sale. In addition, our improved financial condition and credit profile is allowing us to receive cash collateral back related to various commercial commitments. During the third quarter of 2004, we received $39.6 million of collateral back and expect to receive additional amounts during the balance of the year. We expect our cash interest payments to decline predominantly as a result of the conversion and redemption of our convertible senior notes in June 2004, which will reduce annual cash interest payments by approximately $21 million. Lastly, because of our significant net operating loss carryforwards and future tax losses anticipated from proposed international asset sales, we do not expect to be a cash taxpayer until 2007.

Cash Flow

We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing needs. Highlights of cash flow for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period of 2003 are as follows:

      Operating Activities – Cash flows from operating activities declined by $120.4 million. Included in 2004 was a $20.0 million voluntary cash contribution to our pension plan, the payment of $11.4 million to retire life insurance policy loans related to our SERP and Senior

47


Table of Contents

SERP retirement program, and a net receipt of $0.7 million related to the resolution of certain litigation matters. Included in 2003 was a tax refund of $94.5 million and disbursements of $25.1 million (net of insurance recoveries) related to the resolution of certain litigation matters. Excluding these items in both periods, cash flows from operating activities declined $20.3 million or 8.7%. A portion of this decline is attributable to our French business which was divested in March 2004. Cash flow from operating activities in France declined $7.8 million from $26.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 to $18.3 million for the period January 1, 2004 through March 11, 2004.

     The remaining decline of $12.5 million is primarily due to increased net trust deposits in Florida. In February 2004, we began making net trust deposits in Florida for our new preneed sales and discontinued the use of surety bonding as our primary financial assurance mechanism. Net trust deposits to preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts were $11.9 million for new sales in Florida in 2004. No trust deposits to preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts were made for new Florida sales in 2003, as we used surety bonding for those sales.

     Cash interest payments declined $10.0 million to $72.9 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $82.9 million in the same period of 2003. Cash tax payments declined $5.7 million in the first nine months of 2004 to $5.9 million from $11.6 million in 2003. These improvements were offset by working capital declines primarily associated with a decrease in accounts receivable collections and cash outflows associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.

      Investing Activities – Cash flows from investing activities improved by $174.3 million primarily due to an increase in proceeds of $300.0 million from sales of international businesses and equity investments and reduced capital spending, partially offset by $135.0 million in restricted escrow deposits related to certain litigation matters (described below) and $21.9 million in reduced proceeds from our North America divestiture program.

     In March 2004, we completed the joint venture of our funeral operations in France. In addition to maintaining a 25% share of the total equity capital of the newly formed entity, we received net cash proceeds of approximately $287.9 million. Following a successful public offering transaction of our former United Kingdom affiliate during the second quarter of 2004, we liquidated our debt and equity holding in our former United Kingdom affiliate and collected $53.8 million in aggregate of which $49.2 million is reported as an investing activity. During the second quarter of 2003, we sold our remaining equity investment in our operations in Spain and received $26.0 million in proceeds.

     In July 2004, we paid $51.8 million to satisfy a contingent purchase obligation associated with the 1998 acquisition of our businesses in Chile. Also in 2004, we paid $6.3 million as a purchase price adjustment related to our March 2004 joint venture of French business, which brings our cash proceeds from this joint venture to an approximate $281.6 million.

     In March 2004, we deposited $100 million into a restricted escrow fund related to certain litigation matters in Florida. In May 2004, we deposited $35 million (net of $30 million provided by our insurance carriers) into a restricted escrow fund related to the proposed settlement of our securities class action lawsuit originally filed in 1999.

     Restricted cash deposits in 2003 resulted from our decision to replace certain letters of credit with cash collateral for various commercial commitments. Our improved financial condition and credit profile is now allowing us to receive some of this cash collateral back. During the third quarter of 2004, we received $39.6 million of collateral back. During October 2004, we received an additional $15.6 million, reducing our deposits for cash collateral for such commitments to $48.4 million. This compares to $95.3 million at December 31, 2003.

     Capital expenditures declined $12.4 million primarily as a result of the joint venture of our operations in France in March 2004. Capital expenditures by our French operations were $2.8 million during 2004 compared to $23.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Capital expenditures in North America increased $8.8 million mainly due to planned additional spending on growth-oriented projects.

      Financing Activities – Cash used for financing activities improved $64.9 million primarily due to debt restructurings in 2004. In 2004, we have executed a series of transactions to further strengthen our capital structure. In April 2004, we successfully completed a private offering of $250 million principal amount of 6.75% notes due 2016 and received net cash proceeds of approximately $243 million. Including the premium, $219.0 million of the net cash proceeds were applied to the early retirement of $208.7 million in principal of our 6% notes due 2005. Also in April 2004, as required by the terms of the agreement, we repaid the remaining $111.2 million of our 7.375% notes due 2004. Immediately following the June 22, 2004 conversion into common stock of approximately 71% of our outstanding 6.75% bonds due 2008, we exercised our option to redeem the remaining outstanding $91.1 million of the bonds for

48


Table of Contents

$94.6 million in cash, including interest and a premium. With these transactions in 2004, we have significantly extended our debt maturity schedule.

     On August 16, 2004, we announced a share repurchase program authorizing up to $100 million to repurchase our common stock. From August 16, 2004 through September 2004, we repurchased 5.6 million shares of common stock for $34.8 million. During October 2004, we repurchased an additional 3.9 million shares for $24.6 million.

Debt

Our financial condition continues to improve as demonstrated by the following trend in our cash and debt balances:

                                 
(In millions)   September 30,
  December 31,
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
Total debt
  $ 1,294.7     $ 1,701.9     $ 1,974.4     $ 2,522.0  
Cash and cash equivalents
    318.0       239.4       200.6       29.3  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total debt less cash and cash equivalents
  $ 976.7     $ 1,462.5     $ 1,773.8     $ 2,492.7  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     Total debt less cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2004 was $976.7 million, representing the lowest levels in our company since 1992. Total debt has been reduced by over $1.2 billion or 49% since December 31, 2001. This reduction is a result of strong operating cash flows including the receipt of tax refunds of approximately $152 million and a successful asset divestiture and joint venture program that produced over $800 million of net cash proceeds.

     In the first nine months of 2004, we continued to increase our cash balance while simultaneously reducing our total debt. Our cash balance grew by nearly $80 million while our total debt declined by over $400 million. Our cash balance at September 30, 2004 does not reflect a $25 million receivable from our insurance carriers related to the settlement of the litigation matters in Florida (See note twelve to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q).

     Along with our operating cash flows, we received $287.9 million in net cash proceeds from our joint venture of our France operations in March 2004 and collected $53.8 million during the second quarter from the liquidation of our debt and equity holdings in our former United Kingdom affiliate. The conversion into common stock of our convertible bonds in June 2004 reduced total debt by $221.7 million in principal. Our debt also declined due to a $24 million reduction in capital lease obligations associated with our divested French operations. Partially offsetting these items was $135 million in payments into escrow for the proposed settlement of class action litigation matters.

Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities

In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we believe an active funeral and cemetery preneed program, which complements our framework for long-term growth, can increase future market share in our service markets. Preneed arrangement is a means through which a customer contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral service, cremation service, and/or cemetery burial interment right, merchandise or cemetery service to be performed or provided in the future (that is, in advance of when needed or “preneed”).

Preneed Funeral Activities

Since preneed funeral services or merchandise will not be provided until some time in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral contracts be protected for the benefit of the customer pursuant to applicable law. Some or all of the funds may be required to be placed into trust accounts, or a surety bond may be posted in lieu of trusting (collectively “trust funded preneed funeral contracts”). Alternatively, where allowed, customers may choose to purchase a life insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies to fund their preneed funeral (“insurance funded preneed funeral contract”). Only certain of these customer funding options may be applicable in any given market we serve.

     The contract amounts associated with unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet. However, when customers enter into a trust funded preneed contract, we record an asset, Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and a corresponding obligation, Deferred preneed funeral revenues in our consolidated balance sheet for the contract price. The funeral revenues are deferred and will not be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations until the

49


Table of Contents

funeral services are performed or the merchandise is delivered. When we receive payments on a trust funded preneed funeral contract from the customer, we deposit the amount required by law into the trust and reclass the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed funeral revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts . While some customers may pay for their contract in a single payment, most preneed funerals are sold on an installment basis over a period of one to seven years. On these installment contracts, we receive, on average, a down payment at the time of sale of approximately 11%. Historically, the majority of our preneed funeral trust contracts have not included a finance charge.

      Trust Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where the applicable law requires that all or a portion of the funds collected from preneed funeral contracts be placed in trust accounts, the funds deposited into trust are invested by the independent trustees in accordance with the investment guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor rule is applicable, the guidelines established by our Investment Committee. The trustees utilize professional investment advisors to select and monitor the money managers that make the individual investment decisions in accordance with the guidelines. We retain any funds above the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs. Applicable law governs the timing of the required deposits into the trust accounts, which generally ranges from five to 45 days after receipt of the funds from the customer.

     The trust investments are expected to generate earnings sufficient to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale. As a result of the adoption of FIN 46R, the preneed funeral trust assets have been consolidated and are recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at market value in accordance with SFAS 115. Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in the trust and distributed as each preneed contract is either utilized upon the death of, or cancelled by, the customer. However, in certain states, the trusts are allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us prior to that date. See the Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Changes of Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding the implementation of FIN 46R.

     Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sales of trust funded preneed funeral contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding trust funded preneed funeral contract revenues when recognized. Other selling costs associated with the sales and marketing of preneed funeral contracts (e.g., lead procurements costs, brochures and marketing materials, advertising and administrative costs) are expensed as incurred. An allowance for cancellation is recorded for trust funded preneed funeral contract deferred selling costs based on historical contract cancellation experience.

     If a customer cancels the trust funded preneed funeral contract, applicable law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer, including in certain situations the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously undistributed net investment earnings and pay the customer the required refund. We retain any excess funds and recognize the amounts as funeral revenues in our consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. As a result, when realized or unrealized losses of a trust result in trust funded preneed funeral contracts being under-funded, we will assess those contracts to determine whether a loss provision should be recorded. We have not been required to recognize any loss amounts at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

     The cash flow activity over the life of a trust funded preneed funeral contract from the date of sale to its death maturity or cancellation is captured in the line item Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. While the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer and any distributed investment earnings. This is reduced by the payment of trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs. The effect of amortizing trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs is reflected in Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated

50


Table of Contents

statement of cash flows. At the time of death maturity, we receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings from the trust and any remaining receivable due from the customer. This cash flow at the time of service is generally less than the revenue recognized, thus creating a negative effect on working capital cash flow from operating activities.

     In certain situations pursuant to applicable laws, we can post a surety bond as financial assurance for an amount that would otherwise be required to be deposited in trust accounts for trust funded preneed funeral contracts. See the Financial Assurances section within this Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities section for further details on our practice of posting such surety bonds. We believe the deferred revenues associated with preneed funeral bonded contracts exceed the expected cost of meeting our obligations to provide funeral services and merchandise for the outstanding preneed funeral bonded contracts, and our future operating cash flows will be sufficient to fulfill these contracts without use of the surety bonds.

     If a customer cancels the trust funded preneed funeral contract that has been bonded prior to death maturity, applicable law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer. Because the funds have not been held in trust, there are no earnings to be refunded to the customer or us. We pay the customer refund out of our operating funds, which reduces working capital cash flow from operating activities.

     The cash flow activity over the life of a preneed funeral contract that has been bonded from the date of sale to its death maturity or cancellation is captured in the line item Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The payments received from our customers for their trust funded preneed funeral contracts that have been bonded are a source of working capital cash flow from operating activities until the contracts mature. This is reduced by the payment of deferred selling costs, the premiums to the surety companies for the bond coverage, and refunds on customer cancellations of contracts. When a trust funded preneed funeral contract that has been bonded matures upon the death of the beneficiary, there is no additional cash flow to us unless the customer owed an outstanding balance, thus creating a negative effect on the cash flow from operating activities.

      Insurance Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where permitted, customers arrange their funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies, for which we earn a commission for being the general agent for the insurance company. The policy amount of the insurance contract between the customer and the third party insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed funeral contract. However, we do not reflect the unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our consolidated balance sheet.

     The third party insurance company collects funds related to the insurance contract directly from the customer. The life insurance contracts include increasing death benefit provisions, which are expected to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral contract at the time of need. Approximately 67% of our 2004 North America preneed funeral production is insurance funded preneed funeral contracts.

     The commission we earn for being the general agent on behalf of the third party insurance companies is based on a percentage per contract sold. These general agency (GA) revenues are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third party insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sale of insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are expensed as incurred.

     Additionally, we may receive cash overrides based on achieving certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with the sale of our insurance subsidiaries in 2000. These overrides are recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations.

     If a customer cancels the insurance funded preneed funeral contract prior to death maturity, the insurance company pays the cash surrender value under the insurance policy directly to the customer. If the contract was outstanding for less than one year, the insurance company charges back the GA revenues and overrides we received on the contract. An allowance for these chargebacks is included in the consolidated balance sheet based on our historical chargeback experience.

     The cash flow activity over the life of an insurance funded preneed funeral contract from the date of sale to its death maturity or cancellation is captured in the consolidated statement of cash flows as cash flows from operating activities within our funeral segment. While the unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet, they are included

51


Table of Contents

in funeral trade accounts receivable and funeral revenues when the funeral service is performed. Proceeds from the life insurance policies are used to satisfy the receivables due. The cash flow activity associated with these contracts generally occurs at the time of sale, where the GA revenues received net of the direct selling costs provide a net source of cash flow, and at death maturity, where the insurance proceeds (including increasing death benefit) less the funds used to provide the funeral goods and services provide a net source of cash flow. If the cancellation occurs within the one year following the date of sale, our cash flow is reduced by the charge-back of GA revenues and overrides.

     The table below details the North America results of trust and insurance funded preneed funeral production for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the related deferred selling costs incurred to obtain the trust funded preneed arrangements and the net selling activity associated with insurance funded preneed arrangements included in our consolidated statement of operations. The decline in GA revenue is a result of a shift in product mix from whole life policies to flex insurance policies, for which we earn a lower commission rate. The increase in direct expenses is the result of higher fringe benefits expenses and shifts in the product mix by counselor between trust and insurance. Additionally, the table reflects revenues and previously deferred trust funded preneed funeral contract selling costs recognized in the consolidated statement of operations associated with death maturities of preneed funeral contracts for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

                 
    North America
    Funeral
    Nine months ended
    September 30,
(In millions)   2004
  2003
Preneed Production:
               
Trust (including bonded)
  $ 91.2     $ 97.7  
Insurance (1)
    187.8       167.6  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 279.0     $ 265.3  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs
  $ 11.8     $ 10.3  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Insurance funded preneed funeral selling activity:
               
GA revenue
  $ 22.9     $ 24.2  
Direct expenses
    20.1       19.2  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net activity
  $ 2.8     $ 5.0  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Death Maturity:
               
Previous preneed production included in current period revenues:
               
Trust
  $ 89.1     $ 119.3  
Insurance
    129.1       134.1  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 218.2     $ 253.4  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Amortization/recognition of trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs in current period
  $ 7.2     $ 6.8  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     (1) Amounts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet.

     The following table reflects the North America backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral contract revenues (including amounts related to Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts ) at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Additionally, we have reflected the North American backlog of unfulfilled insurance funded contracts (not included in our consolidated balance sheet) and total North American backlog of preneed funeral contract revenues at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity. The preneed funeral deferred selling costs associated with trust funded contracts (net of an estimated allowance for cancellation) are included with preneed cemetery deferred selling costs as a component of Deferred charges and other assets .

52


Table of Contents

                 
    North America
    Funeral
(In millions)   2004
  2003
Backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral revenues (1)
  $ 1,366.2     $ 1,501.6  
Backlog of insurance funded preneed funeral revenues (2)
  $ 2,204.2     $ 2,018.4  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues (total of (1) and (2))
  $ 3,570.4     $ 3,520.0  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Deferred selling costs associated with trust funded deferred preneed funeral revenues
  $ 98.5     $ 95.4  
 
   
 
     
 
 

  (1)   Includes amounts reflected as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts in the consolidated balance sheet, net of estimated cancellation reserve. Excludes unrealized gains/losses.
 
  (2)   Insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet.

Preneed Cemetery Activities

When purchasing cemetery property interment rights, merchandise, and services on a preneed basis, approximately 30% of our consumers choose to pay the entire amount of the contract at the time of sale. The remaining customers choose to pay for their contracts on an installment basis generally over a period of one to seven years. On these installment contracts, we receive an average down payment at the time of sale of approximately 14%. Historically, the installment contracts have included a finance charge ranging from 3.5% to 15.7% depending on the date sold, the payment period selected, state laws and the payment method (i.e., monthly statement billing or automated bank draft). Unlike trust funded preneed funeral contracts, where the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is recognized as one event at the time of death maturity, the revenues associated with a preneed cemetery contract can be recognized as different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the property has been constructed or is available for interment. With the customer’s direction, which is generally obtained at the time of sale, we can choose to order, store, and transfer title to the customer of their personalized marker merchandise. Upon the earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in our cemetery, we recognize the associated revenues and record the cost of sale. For services, personalized marker merchandise where the customer chooses not to elect vendor storage or early delivery to our cemetery, and non-personalized merchandise (such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are performed and the merchandise is delivered.

     Because the services or merchandise will not be provided until some time in the future, all or a portion of the proceeds from the sale of preneed cemetery merchandise and services may be required by law to be paid into merchandise and services trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is provided. As with trust funded preneed funeral contracts, the funds deposited into trust are invested by the independent trustees in accordance with the investment guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor rule is applicable, the guidelines as established by our Investment Committee. The trustees utilize professional investment advisors to select and monitor the money managers that make the investment decisions in accordance with the guidelines. We retain any funds above the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the

53


Table of Contents

selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs. Applicable law governs the timing of the required deposits into the trust accounts, which generally ranges from five to 45 days after receipt of the funds from the customer. In certain situations pursuant to applicable laws, we post a surety bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust accounts. See the Financial Assurances section within this Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities section for further details on our practice of posting such surety bonds.

     The trust investments are expected to generate earnings sufficient to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed cemetery services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale. As a result of the adoption of FIN 46R, the preneed cemetery trust investments have been consolidated in our balance sheet and are recorded at market value in accordance with SFAS 115. Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in the trust and distributed as each preneed contract item is delivered or cancelled. However, in certain states, the trustees are allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us before the preneed cemetery service or merchandise item is delivered (“distributable states”). Until delivered or cancelled, any investment earnings are attributed to the individual contract items. Recognition of the net investment earnings is independent of the timing of the receipt of the related cash flows, but generally will be the same in states that are not distributable states.

     Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sales of preneed cemetery contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding revenues when recognized. Other selling costs associated with the sales and marketing of preneed cemetery contracts (e.g., lead procurements costs, brochures and marketing materials, advertising and administrative costs) are expensed as incurred. An allowance for cancellation is recorded for cemetery deferred selling costs based on historical contract cancellation experience.

     If a preneed cemetery contract is cancelled prior to delivery, applicable law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously undistributed investment earnings and, where required, issue a refund to the customer. We retain any excess funds and recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any investment earnings payable to the customer) in our consolidated statement of operations. Based on our historical experience, we have included an allowance for cancellation for preneed cemetery contracts in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues in our consolidated balance sheet.

     As the preneed cemetery contract merchandise and service items for which we were required to deposit funds to trust are delivered and recognized as revenues, we receive the principal and previously undistributed investment earnings from the trust. There is generally no remaining receivable due from the customer, as our policy is to deliver preneed cemetery merchandise and service items only upon payment of the contract balance in full. This cash flow at delivery is generally less than the revenue recognized, thus creating a negative effect on working capital cash flow from operating activities, especially if we posted a surety bond in lieu of trusting for the preneed cemetery contract merchandise and service items, as there are no funds in trust available for withdrawal.

     The cash flow activity from the date of sale of a preneed cemetery contract (origination) to the date of the recognition of the deferred revenue upon its delivery or cancellation (maturity) is reported in the Net effect of cemetery production and deliveries line item in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Net effect of preneed cemetery production and deliveries is affected by cash flows provided by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer and distributed trust earnings, reduced by the use of funds for the payment of deferred selling costs when the preneed cemetery contracts are originated. The amortization of the cemetery deferred selling costs is included in Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

     The table below details the North America results of total cemetery sales production and the amounts that have been deferred for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and the related deferred selling costs incurred to obtain the contract items. Additionally, the table reflects previously deferred revenues and previously deferred selling costs recognized in the consolidated statements of operations associated with deliveries/services of cemetery contract items for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

54


Table of Contents

                 
    North America
    Cemetery
    Nine months ended
    September 30,
(In millions)   2004
  2003
Deferral:
               
Total preneed cemetery production
  $ 241.4     $ 257.0  
Total atneed cemetery production
    149.3       121.3  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total cemetery sales production
    390.7       378.3  
Less: Preneed property revenue recognized at date of sale (constructed cemetery interment rights where down payment was at least 10% of the sales price)
    (84.4 )     (79.8 )
Less: Preneed property revenue accounted for as deposits held (cemetery interment rights where the down payment was less than 10%)
    (29.8 )     (26.3 )
Less: Atneed property, merchandise and service revenue recognized at time of sale or service
    (101.8 )     (101.0 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
  $ 174.7     $ 171.2  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Deferred selling costs
  $ 32.6     $ 33.6  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Recognition:
               
Previously deferred revenue included in current period revenues
  $ 149.6     $ 164.5  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Amortization/recognition of deferred selling costs in current period
  $ 23.3     $ 28.5  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     The following table reflects the total North America backlog of Deferred cemetery contract revenues (including amounts related to Non-controlling interests in funeral and cemetery trusts ) and the related preneed cemetery deferred selling costs included in our consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The backlog amount presented is reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity. The preneed cemetery deferred selling costs (net of an estimated allowance for cancellation) are included with preneed funeral deferred selling costs as a component of Deferred charges and other assets .

                 
    North America
    Cemetery
(In millions)   2004
  2003
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues (1)
  $ 1,648.6     $ 1,574.2  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Deferred selling costs
  $ 216.0     $ 204.9  
 
   
 
     
 
 

  (1)   Includes amounts reflected as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts in the consolidated balance sheet, except for unrealized gains or losses. Additionally, upon implementation of FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, we recorded an increase of $43.5 million to Deferred preneed cemetery revenues in connection with the consolidation of certain cemeteries managed but not owned by us.

Financial Assurances

55


Table of Contents

In support of operations, we have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance and/or as required by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales activities. The underlying obligations these surety bonds assure are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues . The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other activities are described below. The increase in preneed funeral surety bonds is primarily a result of the annual review performed in Florida during the first quarter of 2004. This review adjusted the bonds to cover the liabilities associated with sales during 2003. We expect this number to decline in subsequent years as merchandise and services related to such bonded contracts are delivered or performed (see further discussion related to Florida bonding below).

                 
    September 30,   December 31,
(In millions)   2004
  2003
Preneed funeral
  $ 145.8     $ 125.6  
Preneed cemetery:
               
Merchandise and services
    178.9       179.6  
Preconstruction
    10.0       18.1  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations
    334.7       323.3  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Bonds supporting preneed business permits
    3.7       4.8  
Other bonds
    5.5       4.7  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total surety bonds outstanding
  $ 343.9     $ 332.8  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we intend to post surety bonds where allowed by applicable law, except as noted below for Florida. We post the surety bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received from the customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount of the preneed contract that would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable state law. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, we had $66.4 million and $70.2 million, respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do not consider reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or other costs.

     Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts, unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for cemetery preconstruction bonds (which are irrevocable), the surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety company was to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond amount. Management does not expect it will be required to fund material future amounts related to these surety bonds because of lack of surety capacity.

     The applicable Florida law that allows posting of surety bonds for preneed contracts expires December 31, 2004; however, it allows for preneed contracts entered into prior to December 31, 2004 to continue to be bonded for the remaining life of those contracts. Of the total cash receipts attributable to bonded sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, approximately $40.7 million and $52.8 million, respectively, were attributable to the state of Florida. On February 1, 2004, we elected to begin trusting as a financial assurance mechanism in Florida, rather than surety bonding, on new Florida sales of preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services. Our net trust deposits attributable to these eight months of new Florida sales were $11.9 million. No trust deposits were made for new Florida sales in 2003, as we used surety bonding for those sales.

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements

The statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made in reliance on the “safe harbor” protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be accompanied by words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate” or “predict,” that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and in any other documents or oral presentations made

56


Table of Contents

by us, or on our behalf. Important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

  Changes in general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally, impacting financial markets (e.g., marketable security values, as well as currency and interest rate fluctuations) that could negatively affect us, particularly, but not limited to, levels of trust fund income, interest expense, pension expense and negative currency translation effects.
 
  The outcomes of pending lawsuits and proceedings against us involving alleged violations of securities laws and the possibility that insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or that an insurance carrier is unable to pay any covered amounts to us.
 
  Our ability to consummate the previously disclosed proposed settlement of our Consolidated Lawsuit (as defined within our Form 10-Q) involving allegations of violations of federal securities laws.
 
  Our ability to consummate the settlement of lawsuits in Florida as described in the agreement in principle with respect thereto, and the possibility that insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or that an insurance carrier is unable to pay any covered amounts to us.
 
  Amounts payable by us with respect to our outstanding legal matters exceeding our established reserves.
 
  We maintain accruals for tax liabilities which relate to uncertain tax matters. If these tax matters are unfavorably resolved, we will make any required payments to tax authorities. If these tax matters are favorably resolved, the accruals maintained by us will no longer be required and these amounts will be reversed through the tax provision at the time of resolution.
 
  Our ability to successfully implement our strategic plan related to producing operating improvements, strong cash flows and further deleveraging.
 
  Our ability to successfully implement our plan to reduce costs and increase cash flows associated with significant changes being made to our organization structure, process and quality of our sales efforts.
 
  Changes to net income as a result of our ongoing reconciliation processes regarding our trust assets and preneed backlogs.
 
  Changes in consumer demand and/or pricing for our products and services due to several factors, such as changes in numbers of deaths, cremation rates, competitive pressures and local economic conditions.
 
  Changes in domestic and international political and/or regulatory environments in which we operate, including potential changes in tax, accounting and trusting policies.
 
  Changes in credit relationships impacting the availability of credit and the general availability of credit in the marketplace.
 
  Our ability to successfully complete our ongoing process improvement and system implementation projects, including our replacement of our North America point-of-sale information technology systems.
 
  Our ability to successfully access surety and insurance markets at a reasonable cost.
 
  Our ability to successfully exploit our substantial purchasing power with certain of our vendors.
 
  The outcome of a pending Internal Revenue Service audit and future tax deductions resulting from potential asset sales.
 
  The effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, and our ability to certify the effectiveness of the internal controls and to obtain a favorable attestation report of our auditors regarding our assessment of our internal controls.

For further information on these and other risks and uncertainties, see our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including our current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of this document as well as other SEC filings can be obtained from our website at www.sci-corp.com. We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Approximately $315.9 million, or 21%, of our net assets at December 31, 2003, were denominated in Euros related to our French operations. At September 30, 2004, less than 1% of our net assets related to our equity investment in France after consummation of a joint venture transaction. There have been no other material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in such Form 8-K.

57


Table of Contents

     We occasionally use derivative instruments, primarily in the form of forward exchange contracts, to hedge our net investment in foreign assets and for other hedging activities. We generally do not participate in derivative transactions that are leveraged or considered speculative in nature. During the first quarter 2004, we executed certain forward exchange contracts as hedges of our net foreign investment in our France operations and related to our expected proceeds from the sale of a portion of our equity interest in and the prepayment of a note receivable from a United Kingdom company.

     As of September 30, 2004, the above derivative instruments had expired with the sale of France and the receipt of the proceeds from the United Kingdom. We were not a party to any derivative transactions at September 30, 2004.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

In early 2003, we began our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX 404”), which requires detailed review, documentation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting. This detailed review, documentation and testing includes an assessment of the risks that could adversely affect the timely and accurate preparation of our financial statements and the identification of internal controls that are currently in place to mitigate the risks of untimely or inaccurate preparation of these financial statements. We will be required to include a report on management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which must be attested to by our independent auditor. We have not completed our assessment at this time.

     In 2004, we have dedicated to date a significant amount of internal resources and time to our SOX 404 compliance efforts. In addition to our dedicated internal resources, we engaged an accounting firm to assist us in the documentation and testing procedures of the SOX 404 compliance project.

     As required by SOX 404, we are evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our evaluation and documentation of the design effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting is substantially complete. We have initiated the required testing process to evaluate the operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. This testing process involves (1) testing our controls for effectiveness and (2) reviewing the documentary evidence that supports the effective operations of the internal controls over financial reporting.

     As a result of the testing, we have become aware of the deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are described below. We are actively attempting to remediate these identified deficiencies.

    We have identified deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting related to revenue recognition transactions specifically associated with the timely recording of the delivery and performance of cemetery goods and services sold on a preneed basis. As previously reported, we have improved our internal controls and procedures with respect to these matters since the adoption of SAB 101, effective January 1, 2000, and we have further strengthened these internal controls and procedures in 2004 through Company-wide remediation efforts. Furthermore, during the third quarter of 2004, our new point-of-sale information system used by our cemeteries became operational and contains further internal control and procedure enhancements related to this area. We continue to enhance the effectiveness of these internal controls and procedures.

    We have identified deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting related to our preneed funeral and cemetery activities. The identification of these deficiencies resulted from on-going projects to reconcile our preneed backlog detailed records, consolidated trust fund assets and corresponding preneed deferred revenues. These projects continue and could result in changes to estimates or adjustments in the preneed items. We expect to finalize the funeral segment reconciliation project and make significant progress with the cemetery segment reconciliation project by the time we file our 2004 Form 10-K. We have also implemented improvements to our internal controls with respect to our preneed funeral and cemetery activities, and we continue to enhance such internal controls. As noted above, we have implemented new point-of-sale information systems that contain enhanced internal controls related to both preneed and atneed activities in our funeral and cemetery locations.

58


Table of Contents

    We have identified deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls at the funeral and cemetery field level. As a result, we have initiated Company-wide efforts to formalize and improve the operating effectiveness of our field-level internal controls and remediate these deficiencies. We have implemented formal training to educate our funeral and cemetery personnel on our responsibilities mandated by SOX 404 and have implemented key control checklists covering operational and financial controls that are now completed monthly by our funeral and cemetery locations and reviewed by market support centers. Our three market support centers help facilitate the execution of this remediation effort, including the key control checklists, and serve as liaisons between field and corporate offices for reinforcement and implementation of policies and procedures.

    We have identified deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls at the corporate home office level. These deficiencies relate primarily to controls surrounding reconciliations, approvals, proper authorizations and general computer controls. We have initiated efforts to formalize and improve the operating effectiveness of our internal controls at our corporate home office level and remediate these deficiencies.

     Primarily as a result of our decision to implement new point-of-sale information systems in our funeral and cemetery locations, we have experienced significant delays in completing our review, documentation and testing of our internal controls related to our information technology systems and processes. Active plans using significant internal and external resources are currently underway to complete the required SOX 404 work on a timely basis. Despite this delay, we continue to believe our decision to implement the new point-of-sale information systems is ultimately in the best interest of our shareholders.

     While we continue to attempt to remediate the deficiencies identified above, as well as complete our SOX 404 compliance efforts related to our information technology processes, it is possible that we will not complete our testing and retesting efforts by December 31, 2004. It is also possible we could experience further delays in our SOX 404 compliance efforts or identify deficiencies in addition to those discussed above. If we are unable to complete all of our SOX 404 compliance efforts on a timely basis, or if there are deficiencies that have not been remediated, we may be required to conclude in our annual report that our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective as of December 31, 2004. Furthermore, we have not completed our evaluation of the deficiencies identified above at this time; therefore, we have not been able to determine whether the deficiencies described above constitute significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting at this time. If left unremediated, it is possible that the deficiencies described above, or other additional deficiencies identified, could be determined to be significant deficiencies, material weaknesses or aggregate to material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting.

     If our independent auditor either disagrees with our assessment or otherwise concludes that our internal controls are not effective, this will be disclosed in the auditor’s report on internal controls in our annual report. The chairman of our Audit Committee has received communications from our independent auditor stating their concern about our ability to complete our assessment of internal controls over financial reporting on a timely basis.

     In addition to communicating to our independent auditors, we have communicated to our Audit Committee the deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting identified to date, as well as our current remediation efforts. Our management, with the oversight of our Audit Committee, is committed to effectively remediating known deficiencies as expeditiously as possible and continuing our extensive efforts to comply with SOX 404 by December 31, 2004.

     In a separate evaluation performed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of our third quarter of 2004 (the “Evaluation Date”). We reviewed the status of our SOX 404 compliance evaluation and the deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting described above. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting us on a timely basis to material information relating to our Company (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic filings under the Exchange Act except for the deficiencies identified above.

59


Table of Contents

Change in Internal Controls

Except as described in the above paragraphs, there were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

      PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in note twelve to the unaudited consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On August 16, 2004, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100 million to repurchase its common stock. Pursuant to the program, the Company has repurchased shares of its common stock as set forth in the table below.

                                 
    Issuer purchases of equity securities
    (a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
                    Total number   Maximum number (or
                    of shares   approximate dollar
    Total           (or units)   value) of shares
    number of   Average   purchased as part   (or units) that may
    shares   price paid   of publicly   yet be purchased
    (or units)   per share   announced plans or   under the plans or
Period
  purchased
  (or unit)
  programs
  programs
July 1, 2004 – July 31, 2004
                       
August 1, 2004 – August 31, 2004
    1,048,100     $ 6.0060       1,048,100     $ 93,705,116  
September 1, 2004 – September 30, 2004
    4,563,400     $ 6.2490       4,563,400     $ 65,188,499  
 
   
 
             
 
         
 
    5,611,500     6.2036       5,611,500     65,188,499  

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

     
10.1
  Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors.
 
   
10.2
  First Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
 
   
12.1
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

60


Table of Contents

     
32.1
  Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
99.1 
  Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 3, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.2
  Defendants’ Answer to the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 17, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.3
  Defendants’ motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed October 8, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.4
  Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 5, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.5
  Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 24, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.12 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).

     Undertaking

     We hereby undertake, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4) (iii), to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, all constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt not filed herewith for the reason that the total amount of securities authorized under any of such instruments does not exceed 10 percent of our total consolidated assets.

61


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
November 8, 2004  SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
 
 
  By:   /s/ Jeffrey E. Curtiss    
    Jeffrey E. Curtiss   
    Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)   
 

62


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

     
Exhibit    
No.   Description

 
 
 
10.1
  Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors.
 
   
10.2
  First Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
 
   
12.1
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
  Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
99.1 
  Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 3, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.2
  Defendants’ Answer to the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 17, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.3
  Defendants’ motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed October 8, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.4
  Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 5, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999).
 
   
99.5
  Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 24, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.12 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).

63

 

Exhibit 10.1

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

     THIS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of                , 2004, by and between Service Corporation International, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), and                (the “Indemnitee”).

BACKGROUND

     The Indemnitee is an officer and/or director of the Company. It is essential to the Company that it retain and attract as officers and/or directors the most capable persons available. Both the Company and the Indemnitee recognize the increased risk of litigation and other claims being asserted against officers and/or directors of companies in today’s environment.

     The Texas Business Corporation Act, as amended (the “Texas Statute”), expressly recognizes that the indemnification provisions of the Texas Statute are not exclusive of any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification may be entitled under a resolution of the directors, an agreement or as permitted or required by common law. This Agreement is being entered into as permitted by the Texas Statute and as authorized by the board of directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”).

     In recognition of the Indemnitee’s need for substantial protection against personal liability, in order to enhance the Indemnitee’s continued service to the Company in an effective manner, and in part to provide the Indemnitee with specific contractual assurance that the protection of the Texas Statute, the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws and this Agreement will be available to the Indemnitee (regardless of, among other things, any amendment to or revocation of such provisions or any change in the composition of the Board of Directors or any acquisition or business combination transaction relating to the Company), the Company wishes to provide in this Agreement for the indemnification of, and the advancement of expenses to, the Indemnitee as set forth in this Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1. Indemnification.

        (a) In accordance with the provisions of Section 1(b), the Company shall hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitee against any and all expenses, liabilities and losses (including, without limitation, investigation expenses and expert witnesses’ and attorneys’ fees and expenses, judgments, penalties, fines, excise taxes under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) actually incurred by the Indemnitee (net of any related insurance proceeds or other amounts received by the Indemnitee or paid by or on behalf of the Company on the Indemnitee’s behalf), in connection with any action, suit, arbitration or proceeding (or any inquiry or investigation, whether brought by or in the right of the Company or otherwise, that the Indemnitee in good faith believes might lead to the institution of any such action, suit, arbitration or proceeding), whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, or any appeal therefrom, in which the

 


 

Indemnitee is a party, is threatened to be made a party, is a witness or is participating (each, a “Proceeding”) based upon, arising from, relating to or by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is, was, shall be or shall have been an officer and/or director of the Company or is or was serving, shall serve, or shall have served at the request of the Company as an officer and/or director (an “Affiliate Indemnitee”) of another foreign or domestic corporation or nonprofit corporation, cooperative, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust or other incorporated or unincorporated enterprise.

        (b) In providing the foregoing indemnification, the Company shall, with respect to a Proceeding, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by the Texas Statute or by any amendment thereof or other statutory provisions expressly permitting such indemnification which is adopted after the date hereof (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Company to provide broader indemnification rights than said law required or permitted the Company to provide prior to such amendment).

        (c) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section 1 for any expenses actually incurred in any Proceeding initiated by or in the right of the Company, provided that in the event that the Indemnitee shall have been adjudged in a final, nonappealable judgment or other final adjudication to be liable to the Company or shall have been adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received by the Indemnitee, indemnification (i) shall be limited to reasonable expenses actually incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with the Proceeding, and (ii) shall not be made in respect of any Proceeding in which the Indemnitee shall have been found liable for willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of his duty to the Company.

        (d) If the Indemnitee is entitled under this Agreement to indemnification by the Company for some or a portion of the Indemnified Amounts (as hereinafter defined) but not, however, for all of the total amount thereof, the Company shall nevertheless indemnify the Indemnitee for the portion thereof to which the Indemnitee is entitled.

        (e) The Company will indemnify the Indemnitee’s spouse to whom the Indemnitee is legally married at any time the Indemnitee is covered under the indemnification provided in this Agreement (even if the Indemnitee did not remain married to him or her during the entire period of coverage) in any Proceeding, to the same extent and subject to the same standards, limitations, obligations and conditions under which the Indemnitee is provided indemnification herein, if the Indemnitee’s spouse (or former spouse) becomes involved in a Proceeding solely by reason of his or her status as the Indemnitee’s spouse, including, without limitation, any Proceeding that seeks damages recoverable from marital community property, jointly-owned property or property purported to have been transferred from the Indemnitee to his/her spouse (or former spouse). The Indemnitee’s spouse or former spouse also may be entitled to receive Advanced Amounts (as hereinafter defined) to the same extent that the Indemnitee is entitled to Advanced Amounts herein. The Company may maintain insurance to cover its obligation hereunder with respect to the Indemnitee’s spouse (or former spouse) or set aside assets in a trust or escrow funds for that purpose. Any spouse or former spouse of the

2


 

Indemnitee entitled to indemnification under this Section 1(e) is an intended third party beneficiary of this Agreement.

     2. Other Indemnification Arrangements. The Texas Statute permits the Company to purchase and maintain insurance or furnish similar protection or make other arrangements, including, without limitation, securing indemnification obligations by granting a security interest or other lien on the assets of the Company and providing self insurance, a letter of credit, guaranty or surety bond (collectively, the “Indemnity Arrangements”) on behalf of the Indemnitee against any liability asserted against him or incurred by or on behalf of him in such capacity as an officer and/or director of the Company or as an Affiliate Indemnitee, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the Company would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under the provisions of this Agreement or under the Texas Statute, as it may then be in effect. The purchase, establishment and maintenance of any such Indemnity Arrangement shall not in any way limit or affect the rights and obligations of the Company or of the Indemnitee under this Agreement except as expressly provided herein, and the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the Indemnitee shall not in any way limit or affect the rights and obligations of the Company or the other party or parties thereto under any such Indemnity Arrangement. All amounts payable by the Company pursuant to this Section 2 and Section 1 hereof, including the Advanced Amounts (as defined below), are herein referred to as “Indemnified Amounts.”

     3. Advance Payment of Indemnified Amounts.

        (a) The Indemnitee hereby is granted the right to receive promptly in advance of a final, nonappealable judgment or other final adjudication of a Proceeding (a “Final Determination”) the amount of any and all expenses, including, without limitation, investigation expenses, expert witness’ and attorneys’ fees and other expenses expended or incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding or otherwise expended or incurred by the Indemnitee (such amounts so expended or incurred being referred to as “Advanced Amounts”).

        (b) In making any written request for the Advanced Amounts, the Indemnitee shall submit to the Company a schedule setting forth in reasonable detail the dollar amount expended or incurred and expected to be expended. Each such listing shall be supported by the bill, agreement or other documentation relating thereto, each of which shall be appended to the schedule as an exhibit. In addition, before the Indemnitee may receive Advanced Amounts from the Company, the Indemnitee shall provide to the Company (i) a written affirmation of the Indemnitee’s good faith belief that the applicable standard of conduct required for indemnification by the Company has been satisfied by the Indemnitee, and (ii) a written undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay the Advanced Amounts if it shall ultimately be determined that the Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct. The written undertaking required from the Indemnitee shall be an unlimited general obligation of the Indemnitee, but need not be secured. The Company shall pay to the Indemnitee all Advanced Amounts within ten business days after receipt by the Company of all information and documentation required to be provided by the Indemnitee pursuant to this Section 3(b).

3


 

     4. Procedure for Payment of Indemnified Amounts.

        (a) To obtain indemnification under this Agreement, the Indemnitee shall submit to the Company a written request for payment of the appropriate Indemnified Amounts, including with such request such documentation and information as are reasonably available to the Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent the Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification. The Secretary of the Company shall, promptly upon receipt of such a request for indemnification, advise the Reviewing Party (as defined in Section (4(f)) in writing that the Indemnitee has requested indemnification.

        (b) The Company shall pay the Indemnitee the appropriate Indemnified Amounts, unless it is established by the Reviewing Party that the Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct of the Texas Statute. For purposes of determining whether the Indemnitee is entitled to Indemnified Amounts, Indemnitee shall be presumed to be entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, and in order to deny indemnification to the Indemnitee, the Company shall have the burden of proof in establishing that the Indemnitee did not meet the applicable standard of conduct. In this regard, a termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, pleading of nolo contendere or its equivalent, or an entry of an order of probation prior to judgment, shall not create a presumption that the Indemnitee did not meet the requisite standard of conduct.

        (c) Any determination that the Indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct required to qualify for indemnification shall be made by the Reviewing Party.

        (d) The Reviewing Party will use its best efforts to conclude as soon as practicable any required determination pursuant to Section 4(c) and will promptly advise the Indemnitee in writing with respect to any determination that the Indemnitee is or is not entitled to indemnification, including a description of any reason or basis for which indemnification has been denied. Payment of any applicable Indemnified Amounts will be made to the Indemnitee within ten business days after any determination of the Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification.

        (e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Indemnitee may, at any time after 60 days after a claim for Indemnified Amounts has been filed with the Company (or upon receipt of written notice that a claim for Indemnified Amounts has been rejected, if earlier) and prior to the expiration of three years after a claim for Indemnified Amounts has been filed, petition a court of competent jurisdiction and obtain formal adjudication of whether the Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under the provisions of this Agreement, and such court shall thereupon have the exclusive authority to make such determination unless and until such court dismisses or otherwise terminates such action without having made such determination. The court shall, as petitioned, make an independent determination of whether the Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification as provided under this Agreement, irrespective of any prior determination made by the Reviewing Party. If the court shall determine that the Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification as to any claim, issue or matter involved in the Proceeding with respect to which there has been no prior determination pursuant to this Agreement or with respect to which there has been a prior determination that the Indemnitee was not entitled to

4


 

indemnification hereunder, the Company shall pay all expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) actually incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with such judicial determination.

        (f) If there has not been a Change in Control (as defined in Section 4(g)), the “Reviewing Party” shall be selected by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Texas Statute and the Company’s bylaws, and if there has been a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Company’s Board of Directors who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control), any Reviewing Party with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to indemnification under this Agreement or any other agreement or under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws as now or hereafter in effect, or under any other applicable law, if desired by Indemnitee, shall be independent legal counsel selected by Indemnitee and approved by the Company (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld). Such counsel, among other things, shall render its written opinion to the Company and Indemnitee as to whether and to what extent Indemnitee would be entitled to be indemnified hereunder under applicable law and the Company agrees to abide by such opinion. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the independent legal counsel referred to above and to indemnify fully such counsel against any and all expenses (including attorneys’ fees), claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be required to pay expenses of more than one independent legal counsel in connection with all matters concerning a single Indemnitee, and such independent legal counsel shall be the independent legal counsel for any or all other Indemnitees unless (i) the employment of separate counsel by one or more Indemnitees has been previously authorized by the Company in writing, or (ii) an Indemnitee shall have provided to the Company a written statement that such Indemnitee has reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between such Indemnitee and the other Indemnitees with respect to the matters arising under this Agreement.

        (g) “Change in Control” shall mean, and shall be deemed to have occurred if, on or after the date of this Agreement, (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company acting in such capacity or a corporation owned directly or indirectly by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than 20% of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities, (ii) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of Directors of the Company and any new director whose election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof, (iii) the shareholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the total voting power represented by

5


 

the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (iv) the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

     5. Agreement Not Exclusive; Subrogation Rights, etc.

        (a) This Agreement shall not be deemed exclusive of and shall not diminish any other rights that the Indemnitee may have to be indemnified or insured or otherwise protected against any liability, loss or expense by the Company, any subsidiary of the Company or any other person or entity under any charter, bylaws, law, agreement, policy of insurance or similar protection, vote of shareholders or directors, disinterested or not, or otherwise, whether or not now in effect, both as to actions in the Indemnitee’s official capacity, and as to actions in another capacity while holding such office. The Company’s obligations to make payments of Indemnified Amounts hereunder shall be satisfied to the extent that payments with respect to the same Proceeding (or part thereof) have been made to or for the benefit of the Indemnitee by reason of the indemnification of the Indemnitee pursuant to any other arrangement made by the Company for the benefit of the Indemnitee.

        (b) In the event the Indemnitee shall receive payment from any insurance carrier or from the plaintiff in any Proceeding against the Indemnitee in respect of Indemnified Amounts after payments on account of all or part of such Indemnified Amounts have been made by the Company pursuant hereto, the Indemnitee shall promptly reimburse to the Company the amount, if any, by which the sum of such payment by such insurance carrier or such plaintiff and payments by the Company or pursuant to arrangements made by the Company to the Indemnitee exceeds such Indemnified Amounts; provided, however, that such portions, if any, of such insurance proceeds that are required to be reimbursed to the insurance carrier under the terms of its insurance policy, such as deductible or coinsurance payments, shall not be deemed to be payments to the Indemnitee hereunder. In addition, upon payment of Indemnified Amounts hereunder, the Company shall be subrogated to the rights of the Indemnitee receiving such payments (to the extent thereof) against any insurance carrier (to the extent permitted under such insurance policies) or plaintiff in respect of such Indemnified Amounts, and the Indemnitee shall execute and deliver any and all instruments and documents and perform any and all other acts or deeds which the Company deems necessary or advisable to secure such rights. Such right of subrogation shall be terminated upon receipt by the Company of the amount to be reimbursed by the Indemnitee pursuant to the first sentence of this Section 5(b).

     6. Continuation of Indemnity. All agreements and obligations of the Company contained herein shall continue during the period the Indemnitee is an officer and/or director of the Company (or is serving at the request of the Company as an Affiliate Indemnitee) and shall continue thereafter for a period of ten years from the date the Indemnitee ceases to serve as an officer and/or director of the Company or ceases to serve as an Affiliate Indemnitee (whichever is later).

     7. Notice and Defense of Claim. The Indemnitee agrees promptly to notify the Company in writing upon being served with any summons, citation, subpoena, complaint,

6


 

indictment, information or other document relating to any Proceeding or matter which may be subject to indemnification or advancement of expenses covered hereunder. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, with respect to any such Proceeding or matter as to which the Indemnitee notifies the Company of the commencement thereof:

        (a) The Company will be entitled to participate therein at its own expense.

        (b) Except as otherwise provided in this Section 7(b), to the extent it desires, the Company, jointly with any other indemnifying party similarly notified, shall be entitled to assume the defense thereof, with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnitee. After notice from the Company to the Indemnitee of the Company’s election to so assume the defense thereof, the Company shall not be liable to the Indemnitee under this Agreement for any legal or other expenses subsequently incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with the defense thereof other than reasonable costs of investigation or as otherwise provided below. The Indemnitee shall have the right to employ his own counsel in such Proceeding or matter, but the fees and expenses of such counsel incurred after notice from the Company of its assumption of the defense thereof shall be at the expense of Indemnitee unless (i) the employment of counsel by the Indemnitee has been authorized by the Company, (ii) the Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between the Company and the Indemnitee in the conduct of the defense of such action, or (iii) the Company shall not in fact have employed counsel to assume the defense of such Proceeding or matter, in each of which cases the fees and expenses of counsel shall be at the expense of the Company. The Company shall not be entitled to assume the defense of any Proceeding or matter brought by or on behalf of the Company or as to which the Indemnitee shall have made the conclusion provided for in clause (ii) above.

        (c) The Company shall not be liable to indemnify the Indemnitee under this Agreement for any amounts paid in settlement of any Proceeding or matter affected without its written consent. The Company shall not settle any Proceeding or matter in any manner that would impose any penalty or limitation on the Indemnitee without the Indemnitee’s written consent. Neither the Company nor the Indemnitee will unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed settlement.

     8. Defense Counsel. The Indemnitee hereby agrees that in any Proceeding in which the Indemnitee and other past or present directors or officers of the Company (or its successor) who are entitled to indemnification from the Company are named defendants or respondents, the Indemnitee and such other past or present directors or officers shall collectively select one firm of attorneys in any jurisdiction to defend all such defendants and respondents in such Proceeding unless counsel for the Indemnitee concludes in a reasoned opinion that there are issues which may raise conflicts of interest between the Indemnitee and such other persons.

     9. Indemnification for Negligence. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY THEN APPLICABLE LAW AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES HERETO RECOGNIZE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE INDEMNITEE MAY BE INDEMNIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT IN PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE INDEMNITEE.

7


 

     10. Successors; Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Company’s successors and assigns and by the Indemnitee’s personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees. The Company shall require any successor or assignee (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company, by written agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company and to the Indemnitee, expressly to assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform if no such succession or assignment had taken place.

     11. Enforcement. The Company has entered into this Agreement and assumed the obligations imposed on the Company hereby in order to induce the Indemnitee to act as an officer and/or director, as the case may be, of the Company, and acknowledges that the Indemnitee is relying upon this Agreement in continuing in such capacity. In the event the Indemnitee is required to bring any action to enforce rights or to collect monies due under this Agreement and is successful in such action, the Company shall reimburse the Indemnitee for all of the Indemnitee’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses in bringing and pursuing such action. The Indemnitee shall be entitled by or to the advancement of Indemnified Amounts to the full extent contemplated by Section 3 hereof in connection with such proceeding. In the event that the Company shall breach any of its obligations to the Indemnitee hereunder, including the Company’s obligations with respect to the Advanced Amounts under Section 3 of this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the Indemnitee’s remedies available at law would not be adequate and that Indemnitee would be entitled to the remedies of specific performance and injunctive relief to enforce such obligations of the Company.

     12. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court to require the Company to do or to fail to do an act which is in violation of applicable law, such provision shall be limited or modified in its application to the minimum extent necessary to avoid a violation of law, and, as so limited or modified, such provision and the balance of this Agreement shall be enforceable in accordance with its terms.

     13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties relating to the subject matter contained herein and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, written or oral, relating to the subject matter hereof.

     14. Amendment; Waiver. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged unless such modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing signed by the Indemnitee and either the President of the Company or another officer of the Company specifically designated by the directors. No waiver by either party at any time of any breach by the other party of, or of compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement to be performed by such other party shall be deemed a wavier of similar or dissimilar provisions or conditions at the same time or at any prior or subsequent times.

     15. Notices. For the purposes of this Agreement, notices and all other communications provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered or three days after being deposited by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, as follows:

8


 

If to the Company:

Service Corporation International
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, Texas 77019
Attention: General Counsel

If to the Indemnitee:
         
     
 
 
     
 
 
     
 
 

or to such other address as either party may have furnished to the other in writing in accordance herewith, except that notices of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt.

     16. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     17. Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas (without regards to principles of conflicts of laws).

     18. Titles and Captions. All section titles and captions in this Agreement are for convenience only, shall not be deemed part of this Agreement, and in no way shall define, limit, extend, or describe the scope or intent of any provisions hereof.

[Signature page follows.]

9


 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.
         
  COMPANY:


SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
 
 
  By:      
  Name:      
  Title:      
 
         
  INDEMNITEE:
 
 
  By:      
  Name:      
  Title:      
 

10

 

Exhibit 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
SCI 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED JANUARY 14, 2004)

      WHEREAS, Service Corporation International (the “Company”) previously adopted and maintains the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective July 1, 2000 (the “Plan”); and

      WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan at any time; and

      WHEREAS, the Plan, as amended and restated was amended by the “First Amendment” dated August 13, 2003 to change the name of the Plan Administrator;

      WHEREAS , the Plan Administrator executed an amended and restated adoption agreement and basic plan document on January 14, 2004:

      WHEREAS , Company now desires to further amend the Plan as set forth below;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as follows:

  1.   The date of the amendment and restatement of the Plan shall be changed to January 14, 2004 and the Plan name shall be changed accordingly;
 
  2.   Effective as of December 30, 2004, the Introduction to the Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
 
  3.   Effective as of July 1, 2000, Section E.4. of the Adoption Agreement shall be amended to provide that service prior to the time an Employee has attained age 18 shall be counted toward Vesting Service.
 
  4.   The Addendum A to the Plan, which pertains to participation in the Plan by employees of Marsellus Casket Company shall be deleted in its entirety, and the attached Addendum A shall be substituted therefore, effective as of the dates set forth therein;
 
  5.   Effective as of January 1, 2004, Section 1.0(k) of Addendum B to the Plan shall be deleted.
 
  6.   Effective as of January 1, 2004, Addendum D of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:

     “The classification of Employees eligible to participate in the Plan shall include all Employees of CemCare, Inc. (“CemCare”) other than Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement if such agreement does not

 


 

specifically provide for participation in the Plan. Employees of CemCare shall participate in the Plan on the same basis as other eligible Participants.”

  7.   Effective as of December 30, 2004, item B.3. of the Plan’s Adoption Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:
 
      “PLAN YEAR means the 12 consecutive month period beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31, except that there will be a short Plan Year beginning on December 31, 2004 and ending on December 31, 2004.”
 
  8.   Whereas it was not the Company’s intention to change the vesting computation period with the adoption of the “GUST Amended” MassMutual prototype document as the basic plan document (the Adoption Agreement for which was executed January 14, 2004), effective as to the date of such adoption, the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of Section 1.91 of the basic plan document shall be amended to read as follows:
 
      “For vesting purposes, and all other purposes not specifically addressed in this Section, the computation period shall be the calendar year.”
 
      It is the Company’s intention hereby, not to change the vesting computation period, which, pursuant to the prior adoption agreement, was the calendar year.
 
  9.   Effective for claims or requests for review of an adverse benefit determination filed on or after January 1, 2003, Sections 2.10 and 2.11 shall be deleted and the following shall be inserted in lieu thereof:
 
      “2.10 CLAIMS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES

     Claims for benefits under the Plan may be filed in writing with the Administrator. The Administrator will maintain a separate written document explaining the Plan’s claims procedure. This Section 2.10 specifically incorporates the written claims procedure as from time to time published by the Administrator as part of the Plan. Such procedures shall provide for a review of a denied claim in accordance with the requirements of ERISA. If the Administrator makes a final written determination denying a Participant’s or Beneficiary’s benefit claim, the Participant or Beneficiary to preserve the claim must file an action in federal court with respect to the denied claim not later than 180 days following the date of the Plan Administrator’s final determination.”

  10.   Effective as of January 1, 2004, Section 6.2 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following subsection (i):

     “(i) Upon the death of a Participant, any Beneficiary may renounce his or her interest in the Participant’s death benefit. Any such renunciation shall be by written instrument in a form satisfactory to the Administrator and shall be

 


 

received by the Administrator on or before the earlier of (i) the date of any distribution of the Participant’s benefit to such Beneficiary or (ii) five years from the date of the Participant’s death. Upon determination by the Administrator that a Beneficiary has validly renounced his or her interest in the Participant’s benefit, the Participant’s benefit shall be distributed as though such Beneficiary had predeceased the Participant.”

    Except as modified herein, the Plan is in all other respects, specifically ratified and affirmed.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this First Amendment this                      day of Oct. 22, 2004.

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
       
     
  By:   Helen Dugand    
    Helen Dugand,   
    Vice-President of SCI Funeral & Cemetery Purchasing & Cooperative Inc.   
 

 


 

ADDENDUM A

REV. PROC. 2002-29 MODEL AMENDMENT
MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS

Section 1. General Rules

     1.1. Effective Date. Unless an earlier effective date is specified in the Adoption Agreement, the provisions of this addendum will apply for purposes of determining required minimum distributions for calendar years beginning with the 2003 calendar year.

     1.2. Coordination with Minimum Distribution Requirements Previously in Effect. If the Adoption Agreement specifies an effective date of this addendum that is earlier than calendar years beginning with the 2003 calendar year, required minimum distributions for 2002 under this addendum will be determined as follows. If the total amount of 2002 required minimum distributions under the Plan made to the distributee prior to the effective date of this addendum equals or exceeds the required minimum distributions determined under this addendum, then no additional distributions will be required to be made for 2002 on or after such date to the distributee. If the total amount of 2002 required minimum distributions under the Plan made to the distributee prior to the effective date of this addendum is less than the amount determined under this addendum, then required minimum distributions for 2002 on and after such date will be determined so that the total amount of required minimum distributions for 2002 made to the distributee will be the amount determined under this addendum.

     1.3. Precedence. The requirements of this addendum will take precedence over any inconsistent provisions of the Plan.

     1.4. Requirements of Treasury Regulations Incorporated. All distributions required under this addendum will be determined and made in accordance with the Treasury regulations under section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code.

     1.5. TEFRA Section 242(b)(2) Elections. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this addendum, distributions may be made under a designation made before January 1, 1984, in accordance with section 242(b)(2) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) and the provisions of the Plan that relate to section 242(b)(2) of TEFRA.

Section 2. Time and Manner of Distribution.

     2.1. Required Beginning Date. The Participant’s entire interest will be distributed, or begin to be distributed, to the Participant no later than the Participant’s Required Beginning Date.

     2.2. Death of Participant Before Distributions Begin. If the Participant dies before distributions begin, the Participant’s entire interest will be distributed, or begin to be distributed, no later than as follows:

1


 

     (a) If the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary, then, except as provided in the adoption agreement, distributions to the Surviving Spouse will begin by December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant died, or by December 31 of the calendar year in which the Participant would have attained age 70 1/2, if later.

     (b) If the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is not the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary, then, except as provided in the adoption agreement, distributions to the Designated Beneficiary will begin by December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant died.

     (c) If there is no Designated Beneficiary as of September 30 of the year following the year of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s entire interest will be distributed by December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the Participant’s death.

     (d) If the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary and the Surviving Spouse dies after the Participant but before distributions to the Surviving Spouse begin, this section 2.2, other than section 2.2(a), will apply as if the Surviving Spouse were the Participant.

For purposes of this section 2.2 and section 4, unless section 2.2(d) applies, distributions are considered to begin on the Participant’s Required Beginning Date. If section 2.2(d) applies, distributions are considered to begin on the date distributions are required to begin to the Surviving Spouse under section 2.2(a). If distributions under an annuity purchased from an insurance company irrevocably commence to the Participant before the Participant’s Required Beginning Date (or to the Participant’s Surviving Spouse before the date distributions are required to begin to the Surviving Spouse under section 2.2(a)), the date distributions are considered to begin is the date distributions actually commence.

     2.3. Forms of Distribution. Unless the Participant’s interest is distributed in the form of an annuity purchased from an insurance company or in a single sum on or before the Required Beginning Date, as of the first distribution calendar year distributions will be made in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of this addendum. If the Participant’s interest is distributed in the form of an annuity purchased from an insurance company, distributions thereunder will be made in accordance with the requirements of section 401(a)(9) of the Code and the Treasury regulations.

Section 3. Required Minimum Distributions During Participant’s Lifetime.

     3.1. Amount of Required Minimum Distribution For Each Distribution Calendar Year. During the Participant’s lifetime, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each Distribution Calendar Year is the lesser of:

     (a) the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant’s Account Balance by the distribution period in the Uniform Lifetime Table set forth in section 1.401(a)(9)-9 of the

2


 

Treasury regulations, using the Participant’s age as of the Participant’s birthday in the distribution calendar year; or

     (b) if the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary for the Distribution Calendar Year is the Participant’s Spouse, the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant’s Account Balance by the number in the Joint and Last Survivor Table set forth in section 1.401(a)(9)-9 of the Treasury regulations, using the Participant’s and Spouse’s attained ages as of the Participant’s and Spouse’s birthdays in the Distribution Calendar Year.

     3.2. Lifetime Required Minimum Distributions Continue Through Year of Participant’s Death. Required minimum distributions will be determined under this section 3 beginning with the first Distribution Calendar Year and up to and including the Distribution Calendar Year that includes the Participant’s date of death.

Section 4. Required Minimum Distributions After Participant’s Death.

     4.1. Death On or After Date Distributions Begin.

     (a) Participant Survived by Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies on or after the date distributions begin and there is a Designated Beneficiary, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each Distribution Calendar Year after the year of the Participant’s death is the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant’s Account Balance by the longer of the remaining Life Expectancy of the Participant or the remaining Life Expectancy of the Participant’s Designated Beneficiary, determined as follows:

     (1) The Participant’s remaining Life Expectancy is calculated using the age of the Participant in the year of death, reduced by one for each subsequent year.

     (2) If the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary, the remaining Life Expectancy of the Surviving Spouse is calculated for each Distribution Calendar Year after the year of the Participant’s death using the Surviving Spouse’s age as of the Spouse’s birthday in that year. For Distribution Calendar Years after the year of the Surviving Spouse’s death, the remaining Life Expectancy of the Surviving Spouse is calculated using the age of the Surviving Spouse as of the Spouse’s birthday in the calendar year of the Spouse’s death, reduced by one for each subsequent calendar year.

     (3) If the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is not the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary, the Designated Beneficiary’s remaining Life Expectancy is calculated using the age of the Beneficiary in the year following the year of the Participant’s death, reduced by one for each subsequent year.

     (b) No Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies on or after the date distributions begin and there is no Designated Beneficiary as of September 30 of the year

3


 

after the year of the Participant’s death, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each Distribution Calendar Year after the year of the Participant’s death is the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant’s Account Balance by the Participant’s remaining Life Expectancy calculated using the age of the Participant in the year of death, reduced by one for each subsequent year.

     4.2. Death Before Date Distributions Begin.

     (a) Participant Survived by Designated Beneficiary. Except as provided in the adoption agreement, if the Participant dies before the date distributions begin and there is a Designated Beneficiary, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each Distribution Calendar Year after the year of the Participant’s death is the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant’s Account Balance by the remaining Life Expectancy of the Participant’s Designated Beneficiary, determined as provided in section 4.1.

     (b) No Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies before the date distributions begin and there is no Designated Beneficiary as of September 30 of the year following the year of the Participant’s death, distribution of the Participant’s entire interest will be completed by December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the Participant’s death.

     (c) Death of Surviving Spouse Before Distributions to Surviving Spouse Are Required to Begin. If the Participant dies before the date distributions begin, the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary, and the Surviving Spouse dies before distributions are required to begin to the Surviving Spouse under section 2.2(a), this section 4.2 will apply as if the Surviving Spouse were the Participant.

Section 5. Definitions.

     5.1. Designated Beneficiary. The individual who is designated as the Beneficiary under section 6.2 of the Plan and is the Designated Beneficiary under section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 1.401(a)(9)-1, Q&A-4, of the Treasury regulations.

     5.2. Distribution Calendar Year. A calendar year for which a minimum distribution is required. For distributions beginning before the Participant’s death, the first distribution calendar year is the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year which contains the Participant’s required beginning date. For distributions beginning after the Participant’s death, the first Distribution Calendar Year is the calendar year in which distributions are required to begin under section 2.2. The required minimum distribution for the Participant’s first Distribution Calendar Year will be made on or before the Participant’s Required Beginning Date. The required minimum distribution for other Distribution Calendar Years, including the required minimum distribution for the Distribution Calendar Year in which the Participant’s Required Beginning Date occurs, will be made on or before December 31 of that distribution calendar year.

4


 

     5.3. Life Expectancy. Life Expectancy as computed by use of the Single Life Table in section 1.401(a)(9)-9 of the Treasury regulations.

     5.4. Participant’s Account Balance. The account balance as of the last valuation date in the calendar year immediately preceding the Distribution Calendar Year (valuation calendar year) increased by the amount of any contributions made and allocated or forfeitures allocated to the account balance as of dates in the valuation calendar year after the valuation date and decreased by distributions made in the valuation calendar year after the valuation date. The account balance for the valuation calendar year includes any amounts rolled over or transferred to the Plan either in the valuation calendar year or in the Distribution Calendar Year if distributed or transferred in the valuation calendar year.

     5.5 Required Beginning Date. The date specified in section 6.5 of the Plan.

1. Adoption Agreement

(Check and complete section 1 below if any required minimum distributions for the 2002 Distribution Calendar Year were made in accordance with the § 401(a)(9) Final and Temporary Regulations.)

Section 1. Effective Date of Plan Amendment for Section 401(a)(9) Final and Temporary Treasury Regulations.

o Minimum Distribution Requirements, applies for purposes of determining required minimum distributions for distribution calendar years beginning with the 2003 calendar year, as well as required minimum distributions for the 2002 distribution calendar year that are made on or after                      .

(Check and complete any of the remaining sections if you wish to modify the rules in sections 2.2 and 4.2 of this Addendum.)

Section 2. Election to Apply 5-Year Rule to Distributions to Designated Beneficiaries.

x If the Participant dies before distributions begin and there is a Designated Beneficiary, distribution to the Designated Beneficiary is not required to begin by the date specified in section 2.2 of this Addendum, but the Participant’s entire interest will be distributed to the Designated Beneficiary by December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the Participant’s death. If the Participant’s Surviving Spouse is the Participant’s sole Designated Beneficiary and the Surviving Spouse dies after the Participant but before distributions to either

5


 

the Participant or the Surviving Spouse begin, this election will apply as if the Surviving Spouse were the Participant.

This election will apply to:

x All distributions.

o The following distributions:                                                                .

Section 3. Election to Allow Participants or Beneficiaries to Elect 5-Year Rule.

x Participants or Beneficiaries may elect on an individual basis whether the 5-year rule or the Life Expectancy rule in sections 2.2 and 4.2 of this Addendum applies to distributions after the death of a Participant who has a Designated Beneficiary. The election must be made no later than the earlier of September 30 of the calendar year in which distribution would be required to begin under section 2.2 of this Addendum, or by September 30 of the calendar year which contains the fifth anniversary of the Participant’s (or, if applicable, Surviving Spouse’s) death. If neither the Participant nor Beneficiary makes an election under this paragraph, distributions will be made in accordance with sections 2.2 and 4.2 of this Addendum and, if applicable, the elections in section 2 above.

Section 4. Election to Allow Designated Beneficiary Receiving Distributions Under 5-Year Rule to Elect Life Expectancy Distributions.

x A Designated Beneficiary who is receiving payments under the 5-year rule may make a new election to receive payments under the Life Expectancy rule until December 31, 2003, provided that all amounts that would have been required to be distributed under the Life Expectancy rule for all distribution calendar years before 2004 are distributed by the earlier of December 31, 2003 or the end of the 5-year period.

6


 

EXHIBIT A

SCI 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED (JANUARY 14, 2004)

INTRODUCTION

     Service Corporation International has previously adopted the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of July 1, 2000. The Plan is an individually designed single employer plan, but has been amended and restated to conform to the “GUST amended” version of the MassMutual Retirement Services FlexInvest Defined Contribution Prototype Plan and Non-Standardized 401(k) Profit Sharing Adoption Agreement which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, with the modifications set forth below and any and all other modifications as may be separately set forth in Addenda or Amendments to the Plan. This Introduction is amended as set forth below effective as of December 30, 2004, except where a different effective date is noted. The provisions of this Introduction and any addenda to the Plan supersede and control with respect to any contrary provisions of the Plan set forth in the adoption agreement or basic plan document.

1.   Effective as of July 1, 2000, notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, all Years of Service with the Company prior to a Break in Service shall be included for purposes of determining the Participant’s vested interest under Section 6.4 of the Plan if such Participant had a nonforfeitable accrued benefit in the SCI Cash Balance Plan or the SCI Pension Plan at the time such Participant first incurred a One-Year Break in Service.
 
2.   Effective as of January 1, 2001, the Percentage Match for each Participant shall be determined based on the Participant’s Years of Vesting Service as of the end of each Plan Year and shall apply for the entire next Plan Year notwithstanding the fact that the Participant may be credited with an additional Year of Service during such next Plan Year.
 
3.   Addenda A through E as amended by the First Amendment and as may be amended from time to time shall be incorporated into the Plan for all purposes.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Plan’s amended and restated adoption agreement was executed on the 14th day of January 2004 and this Introduction (as amended by the First Amendment) is hereby executed on this 22 day of October, 2004 by a duly authorized officer of the Plan Administrator by authority granted by the Plan sponsor.

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
       
     
  By:   Helen Dugand    
    Helen Dugand   
    Vice-President of SCI Funeral & Cemetery Purchasing & Cooperative, Inc. 
 

7

 

Exhibit 12.1

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(In thousands, except ratio amounts)

                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30,
    2004
  2003
            (Restated)
Earnings:
               
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes
  $ 95,673     $ 82,472  
Minority interest in income of majority owned subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges
    338       432  
Add fixed charges as adjusted (from below)
    109,058       122,813  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 205,069     $ 205,717  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Fixed charges:
               
Interest expense:
               
Corporate
  $ 87,563     $ 100,703  
Amortization of debt costs
    7,105       7,265  
1/3 of rental expense
    14,390       14,845  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Fixed charges
    109,058       122,813  
Less: Capitalized interest
           
 
   
 
     
 
 
Fixed charges as adjusted
  $ 109,058     $ 122,813  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Ratio (earnings divided by fixed charges)
    1.88       1.68  
 
   
 
     
 
 

 

 

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert L. Waltrip, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Service Corporation International (the “registrant”);
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

         
     
Date: November 8, 2004  /s/ Robert L. Waltrip    
  Robert L. Waltrip   
  Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer 
 
 

 

 

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey E. Curtiss, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Service Corporation International (the “registrant”);
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

         
     
Date: November 8, 2004  /s/ Jeffrey E. Curtiss    
  Jeffrey E. Curtiss   
  Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer 
 
 

 

 

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Robert L. Waltrip, of Service Corporation International, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
  (2)   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service Corporation International.

Dated: November 8, 2004
         
     
  /s/ Robert L. Waltrip    
  Robert L. Waltrip   
  Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer 
 
 

 

 

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Jeffrey E. Curtiss, of Service Corporation International, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
  (2)   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service Corporation International.

Dated: November 8, 2004
         
     
  /s/ Jeffrey E. Curtiss   
  Jeffrey E. Curtiss   
  Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)