UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from                                           to                                          

Commission file number 001-02658

STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 625-8100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $1 par value

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant ’ s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o

     The aggregate market value of the Common Stock (based upon the closing sales price of the Common Stock of Stewart Information Services Corporation, as reported by the NYSE on June 30, 2004) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $575,854,145.

     As of March 7, 2005, 17,076,651 shares of Common Stock, $1 par value, and 1,050,012 shares of Class B Common Stock, $1 par value, were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

     Portions of the definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”), relating to the annual meeting of the registrant’s stockholders to be held April 29, 2005, are incorporated by reference in Parts III and IV of this document.

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT

Year Ended December 31, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Forward-Looking Statements

     All statements included in this report, other than statements of historical facts, addressing activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties including, among other things, changes in mortgage interest rates, employment levels, actions of competitors, changes in real estate markets, general economic conditions, legislation (primarily legislation relating to title insurance) and other risks and uncertainties discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

As used in this report, “we”, “us”, “Stewart” and “our” mean Stewart Information Services Corporation and our subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

P A R T    I

     Experience shows that most claims against policies and claim payments are made in the first six years after the policy has been issued, although claims may be made many years later. By their nature, claims are often complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts and are affected by economic and market conditions and the legal environment existing at the time of settlement of the claims. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the length of time over which claims are paid, the significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors.

     Our liability for estimated title losses comprises both known claims and other losses expected to be reported in the future. The amount of our loss reserve represents the aggregate future payments, net of recoveries, that we expect to incur on policy and escrow losses and in costs to settle claims. Provisions are charged to income in the same year the related premium revenues are recognized. The amounts provided are based on reported claims, historical loss experience, title industry averages, current legal environment and types of policies written.

     Amounts shown as our estimated liability for future loss payments are continually reviewed by us for reasonableness and adjusted as appropriate. Independent actuaries also reviewed the adequacy of the liability amounts on an annual basis and found our reserves adequate at each year end. In accordance with industry practice, the amounts have not been discounted to their present values.

      Factors affecting revenues . Title revenues are closely related to the level of activity in the real estate markets we serve and the prices at which real estate sales are made. Real estate sales are directly affected by the availability and cost of money to finance purchases. Other factors include demand by buyers, consumer confidence and family incomes. These factors may override the seasonal nature of the title business. Generally, the third quarter is the most active in terms of real estate sales and the first quarter is the least active. In addition, when interest rates decline, the number of refinancing transactions and associated revenues generally increase.

Selected information for the national real estate industry follows (2004 amounts are preliminary):

      Customers . The primary sources of title business are attorneys, builders, developers, lenders and real estate brokers. No one customer was responsible for as much as ten percent of our title operating revenues in any of the last three years. Titles insured include residential and commercial properties, undeveloped acreage, farms, ranches and water rights.

     Service, location, financial strength, size and related factors affect customer acceptance. Increasing market share is accomplished primarily by providing superior service. The parties to a closing are concerned with personal schedules and the interest and other costs associated with any delays in the settlement. The rates charged to customers are regulated, to varying degrees, by different states.

     Financial strength and stability of the title underwriter are important factors in maintaining and increasing our agency network. Among the nation’s top four title insurers, we earned one of the highest ratings awarded by the title industry’s leading rating companies. Our principal underwriter, Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Guaranty) is currently rated A” by Demotech, Inc., A+ by Fitch, A+ by Lace Financial, A2 by Moody’s and A- by Standard & Poor’s.

      Market share . Title insurance statistics are compiled quarterly by the title industry’s national association. Based on unconsolidated statutory net premiums written through September 30, 2004, Guaranty is one of the leading title insurers in America.

     Our principal competitors include Fidelity National Financial, Inc., The First American Corporation and LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. Like most title insurers, we also compete with abstractors, attorneys who issue title opinions and attorney-owned title insurance bar funds. We also compete with issuers of alternative title insurance products, which typically provide more limited coverage and less service for a smaller premium. A number of homebuilders, financial institutions, real estate brokers and others own or control title insurance agencies, some of which issue policies underwritten by Guaranty. This “controlled” business also provides competition for our agencies.

-2-

      Title revenues by state . The approximate amounts and percentages of consolidated title operating revenues for the last three years were:

      Offices . At December 31, 2004, we had 7,854 policy-issuing offices and agencies, compared with 7,211 a year earlier and 6,466 two years earlier. Of these totals 7,213, 6,669 and 5,979 were independent agencies at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      Regulations . Title insurance companies are subject to comprehensive state regulations covering premium rates, agency licensing, policy forms, trade practices, reserve requirements, investments and the flow of funds between an insurer and its parent or its subsidiaries and any similar related party transactions. Kickbacks and similar practices are prohibited by various state and federal laws.

Real Estate Information

The real estate information segment primarily provides electronic delivery of data, products and services related to real estate. Our services related to the mortgage origination process include flood certificates, credit reports, traditional and automated property valuations, electronic mortgage documents, property information reports and tax services. We also provide post-closing outsourcing services for residential mortgage lenders, including document review, investor delivery, FHA/VA insuring, document retrieval, preparation and recordation of assignments, lien releases and security interests, collateral reviews and loan pool certifications. In addition, we provide diverse products and services related to I.R.C. Section 1031 tax-deferred exchanges; automated mapping projects and geodetic positioning; real estate database conversion, construction, maintenance and access; automation for government recording and registration; and criminal, credit and motor vehicle background checks and pre-employment screening services.

      Factors affecting revenues . As in the title segment, REI revenues, particularly those generated by mortgage information services and tax-deferred exchanges, are closely related to the level of activity in the real estate market. Revenues related to many services are generated on a project basis. Contracts for automating government recording and registration and mapping projects are often awarded after a lengthy bid process.

     Our principal competitors vary across the wide range of services. In the mortgage-related products and services area, competitors include the major title underwriters mentioned under “Title – Market share”, as well as entities known as vendor management companies.

     Another important factor affecting revenues is the advancement of our technological ability to provide our customers with easy access to and use of reliable and complete real estate information.

      Customers . The primary sources of our REI business are residential mortgage lenders and servicers. Our timeliness and accuracy in providing services are critical to our customers since these factors directly affect the service they provide to their customers, primarily borrowers. Delays and errors directly impact the cost of originating or servicing the loan or the value of the loan asset. Our other customers include title agencies, county clerks and recorders, municipalities, real estate professionals and attorneys. Our financial strength, marketplace presence and reputation as a technology innovator are important factors in attracting new business.

General

Technology . Our automation products and services are increasing productivity in the title office and speeding the real estate closing process for lenders, real estate professionals and consumers. Before automation, an order typically required several individuals to search the title, retrieve and review documents and create the title policy commitment. Today, on a normal subdivision file, one person can receive the order electronically and, on the same computer screen, view the prior file, examine the index of documents, retrieve and review electronically stored documents, prepare the title policy commitment and deliver the finished product.

-3-

Trademarks . We have developed numerous automation products and processes that are crucial to both our title and REI segments. These systems automate most facets of the real estate transaction. Among these trademarked products and processes are AIM ^® , E-Title ^® , GlobeXplorer ^® , Landata Title Office ^® , REIMall ^® , SureClose ^® , TitleLogix ^® and Virtual Underwriter ^® . We consider these trademarks, which are perpetual in duration, to be important to our business.

      Employees . As of December 31, 2004, we and our subsidiaries employed 8,961 people. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

      Available information . We file annual, quarterly and other reports and information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). You may read and copy any material that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (PRR) at 450 5 ^th Street, N.W., Room 1200, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain additional information about the PRR by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site ( http://www.sec.gov ) that contains reports, proxies, information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us.

     We also make available, free of charge on or through our Internet site ( http://www.stewart.com ), our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Code of Ethics and other information statements and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

P A R T    II

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth, for the periods and at the dates indicated, our selected consolidated financial data. The financial data were derived from our consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, including the Notes thereto, beginning on page F-1 of this Report. See also Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

-7-

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s overview . We reported net earnings of $82.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared with net earnings of $123.8 million for the same period in 2003. On a diluted per share basis, net earnings were $4.53 for the year 2004, compared with net earnings of $6.88 per diluted share for the year 2003. Revenues for the year decreased 2.5% to $2,182.9 million from $2,239.0 million last year.

     Operating profit margins decreased year-over-year primarily due to the fixed nature of most of our operating costs. Margins were also reduced due to our investments in growth, technology and new services. Excluding title agency retentions, employee costs are the largest component of Stewart’s operating costs. Consistent with our strategy of balancing employee costs with our business volume over the long term, employee costs and order counts are continually monitored. We work to balance staffing with customer service needs using scalable technology to allow for continued growth. Also, we continue to emphasize growing our higher-margin commercial business, executing accretive acquisitions and expanding internationally. Stewart believes these strategies will position it for future growth, diversification and strength.

Critical accounting estimates . Actual results can differ from the accounting estimates we report. However, we believe there is no material risk of a change in our estimates that is likely to have a material impact on our reported financial condition or operating performance for the three years ended December 31, 2004.

      Title loss reserves . Our most critical accounting estimate is providing for title loss reserves. Our liability for estimated title losses comprises both known claims and claims expected to be reported in the future. The amount of the reserve represents the aggregate future payments, net of recoveries, that we expect to incur on policy and escrow losses and in costs to settle claims.

     We base our estimates on reported claims, historical loss experience, title industry averages and the current legal and economic environment. In making estimates, we use moving-average ratios of recent actual policy loss payment experience, net of recoveries, to premium revenues. Provisions for title losses, as a percentage of title operating revenues, were 4.8% and 4.4% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. A change of 0.1% in this percentage would have changed the provision for title losses and pretax earnings by approximately $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     Estimating future loss payments is difficult and our assumptions are subject to the risk of change. Claims, by their very nature, are complex and involve uncertainties as to the dollar amount and timing of individual payments. Claims are often paid up to 20 years or more after the policy is issued.

     We have consistently followed the same basic method of estimating loss payments for more than ten years. Third-party consulting actuaries have reviewed and found our title loss reserves to be adequate at each year end for more than nine years.

      Goodwill and other long-lived assets . Based on events that may indicate impairment of title plants and other long-lived assets, and our annual June 30 ^th evaluation of goodwill, we estimate and expense any loss in value to our current operations. The process of determining impairment relies on projections of future cash flows, operating results and market conditions. Uncertainties exist in these projections and bear the risk of change related to factors such as interest rates and overall real estate markets. Actual market conditions and operating results may vary materially from our projections. There were no impairment write-offs of goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2002. During 2003, $1,955,000 of goodwill attributed to a subsidiary held for sale was written off and is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated financial statements. We use third-party appraisers to assist us in determining the fair value of our reporting units and assessing whether an impairment of goodwill exists.

      Policy-issuing agency revenues . We recognize premium revenues on title insurance policies written by independent agencies when the policies are reported to us. In addition, because of the time lag between the closing of an insured real estate transaction and the time the policy is reported to us, we also accrue for unreported policies (policies issued prior to period end, but not reported to the underwriter until after period end) where reasonable estimates can be made. We believe that reasonable estimates can be made when recent and consistent policy issuance information is available. Our estimates are based on historical reporting patterns and other information about our agencies. We also use current trends in our direct operations and in the title industry. In this accrual, we are not estimating future transactions. We are estimating policies that have already been issued but not yet received by us. We have consistently followed the same basic method of estimating unreported policies for more than ten years.

What we do . Our primary business is title insurance and settlement-related services. We close transactions and issue title policies on homes, commercial properties and other real property located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and a number of foreign countries through more than 7,800 policy-issuing offices and agencies. We also sell electronically

-8-

delivered real estate services and information, as well as mapping products and geographic information systems, to domestic and foreign governments and private entities. Our current levels of non-USA operations are immaterial with respect to our consolidated financial results.

     Our business has two main segments: title insurance-related services and real estate information (REI). These segments are closely related due to the nature of their operations and common customers.

Factors affecting revenues . The principal factors that contribute to increases in our operating revenues for our title and REI segments include:

	•	declining mortgage interest rates, which usually increase home sales and refinancing transactions;
	•	rising home prices;
	•	higher premium rates;
	•	number of households;
	•	increased market share;
	•	opening of new offices and acquisitions; and
	•	a higher ratio of commercial transactions that, although fewer in number, typically yield higher premiums.

These factors may override the seasonal nature of the title business.

Results of Operations

A comparison of the results of operations of the Company for 2004 with 2003 and 2003 with 2002 follows. Factors contributing to fluctuations in results of operations are presented in their order of monetary significance. We have quantified, when necessary, significant changes.

Operating environment . A table of selected published industry residential data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 follows. (The amounts shown for 2004 are preliminary and subject to revision.) The amounts below may not relate directly to or provide accurate data for forecasting our operating revenues or order counts.

     As shown above, interest rates declined for five consecutive quarters, beginning in the second quarter of 2002 through the second quarter of 2003. Then, rates increased significantly by 50 basis points to 6.01%. Mortgage originations fell to lower levels beginning in the fourth quarter of 2003, primarily because refinancing transactions fell dramatically. Sales of new and existing homes continued an upward trend.

     The Company’s order levels also began to decline in the third quarter of 2003, largely because of the increase in interest rates. They remained below prior year levels through August 2004. For the rest of 2004, orders exceeded the number of orders received in 2003. Some of this increase was due to acquisitions. Our order counts follow (in thousands):

     Most industry experts project mortgage interest rates to rise slightly in 2005. Due to the large number of refinancings completed in 2003 and 2004, significantly fewer refinancing transactions are being forecast for 2005.

-9-

Title revenues . Our revenues from direct operations decreased 0.9% in 2004 and increased 29.2% in 2003. Acquisitions added revenues of $49.6 million and $48.8 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The number of direct closings we handled decreased 20.8% in 2004 and increased 24.1% in 2003. The largest revenue decreases in 2004 were in Texas, Colorado and Illinois, offset by increases in New York, Canada, California and Puerto Rico. The largest increases in 2003 were in California, Texas, Canada and Washington. Direct closings relate only to files closed by our underwriters and subsidiaries and do not include closings by independent agencies.

     The average revenue per closing increased 20.0% in 2004 due to a lower ratio of refinancings closed by our direct operations compared to the prior year. The average revenue per closing increased 4.3% in 2003. Title insurance premiums on refinancings are typically less than on property sales. The increase in average revenue per closing was also due to an increased proportion of commercial transactions and rising home prices.

     Premium revenues from independent agencies decreased 3.4% in 2004 and increased 25.6% in 2003. The decrease in 2004 was primarily due to a decrease in refinancing transactions offset somewhat by an increase in property sales. We are unable to quantify the relative contributions from refinancings and property sales because, in most jurisdictions, our independent agencies are not required to report this information. Our statements on sales and refinancings are based on published industry data from sources such as the Mortgage Bankers Association, the National Association of Realtors ^® , Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We also use information from our direct operations.

     The largest decreases in 2004 in premium revenues from independent agencies were primarily in California, Utah, New York and Michigan, offset partially by increases in Virginia, Florida and Pennsylvania. The increases in 2003 were primarily due to the increases in both refinancings and property sales. The largest increases in 2003 were in California, New York and Florida.

     The Texas Department of Insurance reduced title insurance premium rates by 6.5% effective July 1, 2004. The impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations of this rate decrease was immaterial.

Title revenues by state . The approximate amounts and percentages of consolidated title operating revenues for the last three years were as follows:

REI revenues . Real estate information revenues were $68.9 million in 2004, $78.7 million in 2003 and $71.1 million in 2002. The decrease in 2004 resulted primarily from a lesser amount of post-closing services and electronic mortgage documents resulting from a reduction in the volume of real estate transactions, offset somewhat by an increase in Section 1031 property exchange services. The increase in 2003 resulted primarily from providing a greater number of post-closing services, electronic mortgage documents and Section 1031 property exchange services resulting from the large volume of real estate transactions.

Investments . Investment income increased 13.7% in 2004 because of increases in average balances invested, partially offset by lower yields. Investment income decreased 4.3% in 2003 because of lower yields, partially offset by increases in average balances invested. Certain investment gains in 2004, 2003 and 2002 were realized as part of the ongoing management of the investment portfolio for the purpose of improving performance.

Agency retention . The amounts retained by agencies, as a percentage of revenues from agency operations, were 81.7%, 82.0% and 81.9% in the years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amounts retained by title agencies are based on agreements between agencies and our title underwriters. The percentage that amounts retained by agencies bears to agency revenues may vary from year to year because of the geographical mix of agency operations and the volume of title revenues.

-10-

Selected cost ratios (by segment) . The following table shows employee costs and other operating expenses as a percentage of related title and real estate information operating revenues for the last three years.

     These two categories of expenses are discussed below in terms of year-to-year monetary changes.

Employee costs . Employee costs for the combined business segments increased 3.1% in 2004 and 26.5% in 2003. The number of persons we employed at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was approximately 9,000, 8,200 and 7,800, respectively. The increase in staff in 2004 was primarily due to 512 employees, and $28.2 million in employee costs, from acquisitions. The increase in staff in 2003 was primarily due to increased title and REI volume and acquisitions.

     In our REI segment, employee costs remained flat in 2004 but increased in 2003 primarily because we provided more post-closing services to lenders. These services are considerably more labor intensive than other REI services.

Other operating expenses . Other operating expenses for the combined business segments increased 5.7% in 2004 and 23.5% in 2003. The increase in other operating expenses in 2004 was primarily from acquisitions and new offices, which contributed approximately $12.5 million of the increase. Other 2004 increases were in litigation costs of $4.7 million, rent and technology costs. The increases were partially offset by decreases in certain REI expenses in response to volume decreases, supplies expense and attorney fees. The increase in other operating expenses in 2003 was primarily due to acquisitions and new offices, search fees, premium taxes and business promotion.

     Other operating expenses also includes title plant expenses. Most of our operating expenses follow, to varying degrees, the changes in transaction volume and revenues.

     Our employee costs and certain other operating expenses are sensitive to inflation. To the extent inflation causes increases in the prices of homes and other real estate, premium revenues also increase. Premiums are determined in part by the insured values of the transactions we handle.

Title losses . Provisions for title losses, as a percentage of title operating revenues, were 4.8%, 4.4% and 4.5% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. An increase in loss payment experience for prior policy years resulted in an increase in our loss ratio in 2004.

Income taxes . The provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes represented effective tax rates of 38.1%, 38.0% and 38.6% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Contractual obligations. Our material contractual obligations at December 31, 2004 were:

     Material contractual obligations consist mainly of notes payable, operating leases and title losses. All operating leases are for office space and expire over the next 12 years. Future loss reserve payments are shown in total because we cannot accurately estimate the time period in which losses may be paid because claims, by their nature, are complex and incurred and paid over long periods of time. Loss reserves represent a total estimate only, whereas the other contractual obligations are determinable as to timing and amounts. Title losses paid were $68.4 million, $58.0 million and $48.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

-11-

Liquidity and capital resources . Cash provided by operations was $170.4 million, $190.1 million and $162.6 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash flow from operations has been the primary source of financing for additions to property and equipment, expanding operations, dividends to stockholders and other requirements. This source may be supplemented by bank borrowings.

     The most significant non-operating sources of cash were from proceeds of investments matured and sold in the amount of $405.7 million, $264.3 million and $163.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We used cash for the purchases of investments in the amount of $470.8 million, $416.3 million and $197.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     A substantial majority of our consolidated cash and investments at December 31, 2004 was held by Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Guaranty) and its subsidiaries. The use and investment of these funds, dividends to the Company and cash transfers between Guaranty and its subsidiaries and the Company are subject to certain legal restrictions. See Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

     Our liquidity at December 31, 2004, excluding Guaranty and its subsidiaries, was comprised of cash and investments aggregating $30.6 million and short-term liabilities of $2.3 million. We know of no commitments or uncertainties that are likely to materially affect our ability to fund cash needs. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.

     Our loss reserves are fully funded, segregated and invested in high-quality securities and short-term investments. This is required by the insurance regulators of the states in which our underwriters are domiciled. At December 31, 2004, these investments aggregated $417.2 million and our estimated title loss reserves were $300.7 million.

     Historically, our operating cash flow has been sufficient to pay all title policy losses incurred. As reported in Note 4, the market value of our debt securities maturing in less than one year was $25.6 million at December 31, 2004. Combined with our annual cash flow from operations ($170.4 million in 2004), we do not expect future loss payments to create a liquidity problem for us. Beyond providing funds for losses, we manage the maturities of our investment portfolio to provide safety of capital, improve earnings and mitigate interest rate risks.

     Acquisitions during 2004, 2003 and 2002 resulted in additions to goodwill of $45.6 million, $13.7 million and $11.7 million, respectively.

     We consider our capital resources to be adequate. We expect external capital resources would be available, if needed, because of our low debt-to-equity ratio, in which long-term debt is $39.9 million and stockholders’ equity is $697.3 million at December 31, 2004. We are not aware of any trends, either favorable or unfavorable, that would materially affect notes payable or stockholders’ equity. We do not expect any material changes in the cost of such resources. Significant acquisitions in the future could materially affect the notes payable or stockholders’ equity balances.

Off-balance sheet arrangements. We do not have any material source of liquidity or financing that involves off-balance sheet arrangements.

-12-

P A R T    III

P A R T    IV

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION (Registrant)
	By:	/s/                    Malcolm S. Morris
		Malcolm S. Morris, Co-Chief Executive Officer
		and Chairman of the Board of Directors

	By:	/s/                    Stewart Morris, Jr.
		Stewart Morris, Jr., Co-Chief Executive Officer,
		President and Director

	By:	/s/                    Max Crisp
		Max Crisp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
		Officer, Secretary-Treasurer, Director and Principal Financial Officer

Dated: March 11, 2005

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 this report has been signed by the following persons on our behalf and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

-17-

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

F-1

Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Management Report

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Stewart Information Services Corporation

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework .

Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2004, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on our assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Stewart Information Services Corporation

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Management Report, that Stewart Information Services Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Stewart Information Services Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Stewart Information Services Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Stewart Information Services Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as listed in the accompanying index of Stewart Information Services Corporation and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 10, 2005

F-3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Stewart Information Services Corporation

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Stewart Information Services Corporation and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Stewart Information Services Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and intangibles in 2002.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Stewart Information Services Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 10, 2005

F-4

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6