þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Texas | 76-0210849 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
July 31,
January 31,
2006
2006
(Unaudited)
$
17,900
$
16,438
2,000
2,550
8,291
5,793
2,293
3,088
3,425
1,155
1,091
717
1,266
36,266
29,741
20,385
19,924
2,355
2,584
3,358
2,358
2,149
3,000
9
13
$
64,522
$
57,620
$
2,865
$
4,436
3,340
2,066
1,500
625
381
504
286
8,834
7,169
1,500
3,000
10,334
10,169
105
104
66,396
64,404
(4,781
)
(4,686
)
(229
)
(8
)
(10,735
)
(15,427
)
3,432
3,064
54,188
47,451
$
64,522
$
57,620
Table of Contents
For the Three Months Ended
For the Six Months Ended
July 31,
July 31,
2006
2005
2006
2005
$
4,970
$
4,796
$
11,980
$
10,992
442
956
3,149
1,669
5,547
1,250
9,945
1,979
10,959
7,002
25,074
14,640
521
609
1,376
1,206
1,811
2,079
3,551
4,180
163
296
1,640
463
3,332
776
6,078
1,301
5,827
3,760
12,645
7,150
5,132
3,242
12,429
7,490
3,829
2,233
7,363
4,186
309
76
607
152
4,138
2,309
7,970
4,338
994
933
4,459
3,152
210
112
368
197
1,204
1,045
4,827
3,349
49
194
(135
)
32
$
1,253
$
1,239
$
4,692
$
3,381
$
0.13
$
0.14
$
0.49
$
0.38
$
0.12
$
0.13
$
0.46
$
0.35
9,599
9,052
9,585
9,014
10,115
9,694
10,134
9,644
Table of Contents
For the Six Months Ended July 31,
2006
2005
$
4,692
$
3,381
4,158
4,332
794
65
79
(1,509
)
(1,205
)
(272
)
(415
)
(2,016
)
2,074
(2,231
)
490
(232
)
(53
)
(4,143
)
115
78
(371
)
279
3,382
4,708
(4,078
)
(2,237
)
550
(1,000
)
(1,270
)
(457
)
(1,000
)
(2,513
)
3,149
1,669
143
(2,649
)
(4,395
)
706
274
272
(95
)
(918
)
883
(644
)
(154
)
1,462
(331
)
16,438
13,138
$
17,900
$
12,807
$
153
$
30
Table of Contents
1.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (Mitcham or
the Company) have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures
are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 2006. In the opinion of the Company, all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position as of July 31,
2006; the results of operations for the three and six months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005;
and the cash flows for the six months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, have been included. The
foregoing interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results of the operations to
be expected for the full fiscal year ending January 31, 2007.
Certain fiscal 2006 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2007
presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.
2.
Organization
Mitcham Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, was incorporated in 1987. The Company,
through its wholly owned Canadian subsidiary, Mitcham Canada, Ltd. (MCL) and its wholly
owned Russian subsidiary, Mitcham Seismic Eurasia LLC (MSE), provides full-service
equipment leasing, sales and service to the seismic industry worldwide, primarily in North
and South America, Russia, CIS and Eurasia. The Company, through its wholly owned
Australian subsidiary, Seismic Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. (SAP), provides seismic,
oceanographic and hydrographic leasing and sales worldwide, primarily in Southeast Asia and
Australia. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Seamap International Holdings
Pte, Ltd. (Seamap), designs, manufactures and sells a broad range of proprietary products
for the seismic, hydrographic and offshore industries with product sales and support
facilities based in Huntsville, Texas, Singapore and the United Kingdom. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
3.
Acquisitions
On July 12, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the common stock of Seamap. Seamap is engaged
in the design, manufacture and sale of state-of-the-art seismic and offshore telemetry
systems. The proprietary products of Seamap expanded Mitchams market and diversified its
customer base and are complementary to Mitchams marine rental and sales business. Mitcham
now has a broader range of product offerings and Seamaps strategic facilities support
Mitchams expanding global operations. The consolidated financial statements include the
assets and liabilities and the operating results of Seamap from the acquisition date.
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141,
Business
Combinations
, Mitcham applied purchase accounting to the transaction. All of the goodwill
recognized is deductible for tax purposes.
Table of Contents
The purchase included all the net assets of Seamap, which are located in Huntsville, Texas,
Singapore and the United Kingdom. Seamap was purchased for an initial purchase price of $6.5 million,
consisting of $3.5 million paid in cash at closing and $3.0 million issued in promissory
notes payable to the former shareholders of Seamap (see Note 6). In addition, the former shareholders of
Seamap will receive $1.0 million in any measurement period (defined as a twelve month period
beginning May 1 and ending April 30) that the Seamap segment reaches either $8.0 or $10.0
million in revenues during a five-year period ending April 30, 2010, subject to $2.0 million
in aggregate. The Seamap segment earned revenues in excess of $8.0 million during the first
measurement period ended April 30, 2006 and earned the first $1.0 million earn-out payment.
The payment was made in August 2006. Mitcham believes that the purchase price of Seamap will
be economically recovered from future cash flow of Seamap.
The following is a summary of the allocations of the aggregate purchase price to the
estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the respective date
of acquisition, adjusted for the additional $1.0 million earn-out payment:
(in thousands)
$
1,203
153
1,000
1,850
3,358
$
7,564
At the time of the acquisition, Seamap had approximately $153,000 of fixed assets. These
assets consisted primarily of vehicles, computer and workshop equipment and will remain in
use in the same manner as prior to the acquisition.
Pro Forma Results of Operations
The following pro forma results of operations for the three and six months ended July 31,
2005 assumes the Seamap acquisition occurred on February 1, 2005. The pro forma results have
been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to indicate the results of
operations that would actually have occurred had the acquisition been in effect on the date
indicated, or which may occur in the future.
Three Months
Six Months Ended
Ended July 31, 2005
July 31, 2005
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
$
8,139
$
19,687
$
1,216
$
4,045
$
0.13
$
0.45
$
0.13
$
0.42
Table of Contents
4.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories
consist of the following:
July 31,
January 31,
2006
2006
(in thousands)
$
1,443
$
542
1,342
293
708
382
3,493
1,217
(68
)
(62
)
$
3,425
$
1,155
5.
Balance Sheet Detail
July 31,
January 31,
2006
2006
(in thousands)
$
9,244
$
6,918
(953
)
(1,125
)
$
8,291
$
5,793
$
2,405
$
3,136
(112
)
(48
)
$
2,293
$
3,088
$
73,716
$
75,692
366
366
3,744
2,608
379
357
78,205
79,023
(57,820
)
(59,099
)
$
20,385
$
19,924
$
1,000
$
1,000
1,850
1,850
2,850
2,850
(495
)
(266
)
$
2,355
$
2,584
6.
Debt
On June 27, 2005, the Company obtained a $12.5 million revolving loan agreement and credit
line with First Victoria National Bank (the Bank). The facility has a two-year term and
bears interest at the prime rate. Borrowings under the facility are subject to a borrowing
base computed based upon the Companys
Table of Contents
existing seismic equipment lease pool, accounts
receivable and any new seismic equipment to be purchased with proceeds from the facility. Management believes that the full amount of the facility is
available as of July 31, 2006. The credit line is secured by essentially all of the
Companys assets. Interest on any outstanding principal balance is payable monthly, while
the principal is due at the end of the two-year term. The revolving loan agreement also
contains certain financial covenants that require, among other things, that we maintain a
debt to shareholders equity ratio of a maximum of 1.3 to 1.0, maintain a current assets to
current liabilities ratio of a minimum of 1.25 to 1.0, and not incur or maintain any
indebtedness or obligations or guarantee the debts or obligations of others in a total
aggregate amount which exceeds $1.0 million without the prior written approval of the Bank,
except for indebtedness incurred as a result of the Seamap acquisition and other specific
exceptions. No amounts are currently outstanding under this facility.
In connection with the Seamap acquisition in July 2005, the Company issued $3.0 million in
promissory notes payable to the former shareholders of Seamap. The notes are three-year, 5%
notes with no principal or interest due in the first 12 months. Interest on the full amount
of the principal was paid on the first anniversary of the notes in July 2006 in the amount
of $150,000. No further interest or principal payments are due until July 2007 when accrued
interest and 50%, or $1.5 million, of the principal amount of $3.0 million is due. Accrued
interest on the unpaid principal and the remainder of the principal is due in July 2008. The
notes are secured by a pledge of the outstanding stock of Seamap.
7.
Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income,
establishes standards for the reporting and
display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose
financial statements. Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in
shareholders equity (deficit) during the period, except those resulting from investments
by, or distributions to, shareholders. The Company has comprehensive income related to
changes in foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates, which is recorded as follows:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
July 31,
July 31,
2006
2005
2006
2005
(in thousands)
$
1,253
$
1,239
$
4,692
$
3,381
(223
)
269
368
73
$
1,030
$
1,508
$
5,060
$
3,454
8.
Earnings Per Share
Net income per basic common share is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock. Net income per
diluted common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and
dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares
result from the assumed exercise of warrants and outstanding common stock options having a
dilutive effect using the treasury stock method, and from the unvested shares of restricted
stock using the treasury stock method. The following table presents the calculation of basic
and diluted weighted average common shares used in the earnings per share calculation for
the three and six months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005:
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
July 31,
July 31,
(in thousands)
2006
2005
2006
2005
9,599
9,052
9,585
9,014
9,599
9,052
9,585
9,014
487
632
525
621
13
8
16
10
16
9
516
642
549
630
10,115
9,694
10,134
9,644
9.
Stock Options
Stock-Based Compensation
General
Effective February 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based
Payment
(SFAS 123R) using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method,
stock-based compensation expense recognized for share-based awards during the three and six
months ended July 31, 2006 includes: (a) compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, February 1, 2006, based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123)
, and (b) compensation expense for all
stock-based compensation awards granted subsequent to February 1, 2006, based on the grant
date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In accordance with
the modified prospective transition method, results for the prior periods have not been
restated. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company recognized stock-based
compensation expense in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25) and related Interpretations, as
permitted by SFAS 123.
At July 31, 2006, the Company had stock-based compensation plans as described in more detail
below. The total compensation expense related to stock-based awards granted under these
plans during the three and six months ended July 31, 2006, reflecting the impact of the
implementation of the modified prospective transition method in accordance with SFAS 123R,
was approximately $497,000 and $794,000 respectively. The total compensation expense related
to stock-based awards granted under these plans during the three and six months ended July
31, 2005, reflecting compensation expense recognized in accordance with APB 25, was
approximately $39,000 and $65,000. Effective February 1, 2006, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation costs net of a forfeiture rate for only those shares expected to
vest over the requisite service period of the award. The Company estimated the forfeiture
rate for fiscal 2007 based on its historical experience regarding employee terminations and
forfeitures.
The fair value of each option award is estimated as of the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. Expected volatility is based on historical
volatility of the Companys stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected
term of the option. The simplified method described in Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 was used to determine the expected term of our
options. This has resulted in a shorter expected term than the terms calculated under SFAS
123 for pro forma purposes. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based
on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was
not considered in the option pricing formula since the Company does not pay dividends and
has no plans to do so in the future. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options
granted during the six months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was $13.79 and $8.41,
respectively. The assumptions for the periods indicated are noted in the following table.
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended July 31,
2006
2005
4.8 5.2
%
3.05.0
%
5.5 6.3
yrs
8
yrs.
65 66
%
6369
%
0.0
%
0.0
%
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, the impact on income before income taxes and net income
for the three months ended July 31, 2006 was a reduction of approximately $497,000, and a
reduction of approximately $794,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2006 from what would
have been presented if the Company had continued to account for stock option awards under
APB 25. The impact on basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months
ended July 31, 2006 was a reduction of $0.05 and $0.08 per share, respectively.
In addition, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits
related to deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating activities
in the consolidated statement of cash flows. SFAS 123R requires that cash flows resulting
from tax benefits attributable to tax deductions in excess of the compensation expense
recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) be classified as financing in flows and
operating out-flows. The Company had excess tax benefits of approximately $272,000 during
the six months ended July 31, 2006.
The pro forma table below illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if
the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by
SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS
148)
, to all stock-based employee compensation for the three and six months ended July 31,
2005:
Three Months
Six Months
Ended
Ended
July 31,
July 31,
2005
2005
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
$
1,239
$
3,381
(266
)
(484
)
$
973
$
2,897
$
0.14
$
0.38
$
0.13
$
0.35
$
0.11
$
0.32
$
0.10
$
0.30
Stock Option Plans
The Company has share-based awards outstanding under five different plans: the 1994 Stock
Option Plan (1994 Plan), the 1998 Amended and Restated Stock Awards Plan (1998 Plan),
the 2000 Stock Option Plan (2000 Plan), the Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock Awards Plan
(2006 Plan) and the 1994 Non-Employee Director Plan (Director Plan), and together, the
Plans. Stock options granted and outstanding under each of the plans generally vest evenly
over three years (except for the Director Plan, under which
options generally vested after one year) and have a 10-year contractual term. The exercise
Table of Contents
Weighted
Average
Weighted
Remaining
Average
Contractual
Aggregate
Number of
Exercise
Term
Intrinsic Value
Shares
Price
(in years)
(in thousands)
1,054,920
$
5.15
303,000
13.79
(156,920
)
4.70
(420
)
4.14
1,200,580
7.39
6.90
$
7,639
1,183,347
7.31
7.17
7,612
855,914
5.24
2.59
7,104
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic
value (the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options on July 31, 2006. This amount changes based upon the fair
market value of the Companys common stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised for
the six months ended July 31, 2006 was $2.4 million. The fair value of options that vested
during the six months ended July 31, 2006 was approximately $300,000. No options vested in
the quarter ended July 31, 2005.
As of July 31, 2006, there was approximately $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to unvested stock options granted under the Companys share-based
compensation plans. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 2.3 years.
Cash received from option exercises for the six months ended July 31, 2006 was an aggregate
of approximately $706,000. During the six months ended July 31, 2006, income tax payables
were reduced by approximately $540,000 as a result of the tax deduction from option
exercises.
Restricted stock awards as of July 31, 2006 and changes during the six months ended July 31,
2006 were as follows:
Six Months Ended July 31, 2006
Weighted
Number of
Average Grant
Shares
Date Fair Value
8,500
$
1.90
16,000
16.64
(9,000
)
5.15
15,500
$
16.64
Table of Contents
As of July 31, 2006, there was approximately $229,000 of unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.
10.
Discontinued Operations
On August 1, 2003, the Company sold the operating assets of its front-end services segment
(DSI) due to the over-capacity in that market segment. The Company accepted a note
receivable from the purchaser for a portion of the sales price, which will mature during the
current fiscal year. The note receivable is the only remaining asset of the discontinued
operations.
July 31,
January
2006
31
, 2006
(in thousands)
$
239
$
355
$
$
11
$
$
10
11.
Segment Reporting
The following information is disclosed as required by SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
On July 12, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Seamap. For a
description of this acquisition and the operations of this segment, see Note 3.
Manufacturing, support and sales facilities are maintained in the UK and Singapore with a
sales office in Huntsville, Texas.
The Mitcham segment offers for lease or sale, new and experienced seismic equipment to the
oil and gas industry, seismic contractors, environmental agencies, government agencies and
universities. The Mitcham segment is headquartered in Huntsville, Texas, with sales and
services offices in Calgary, Canada; Brisbane, Australia; Ufa, Bashkortostan, Russia; and
associates throughout Europe, South America and Asia.
Financial information by business segment is set forth below net of any allocations (in
thousands):
As of July 31, 2006
Mitcham
Seamap
Consolidated
$
19,349
$
1,036
$
20,385
$
$
2,355
$
2,355
$
$
3,358
$
3,358
Table of Contents
For the Three Months Ended July 31,
For the Three Months Ended July
2006
31, 2005
Mitcham
Seamap
Consolidated
Mitcham
Seamap
Consolidated
$
8,268
$
2,691
$
10,959
$
6,529
$
473
7,002
$
184
$
2
$
186
$
110
$
1
$
111
$
1,628
$
(424
)
$
1,204
$
986
$
59
$
1,045
$
646
$
780
$
1,426
$
1,598
$
$
1,503
$
1,933
$
187
$
2,120
$
2,149
$
6
$
2,155
For the Six Months Ended July 31,
For the Six Months Ended July 31,
2006
2005
Mitcham
Seamap
Consolidated
Mitcham
Seamap
Consolidated
$
19,083
$
5,991
$
25,074
$
14,167
$
473
$
14,640
$
329
$
5
$
334
$
194
$
1
$
195
$
5,507
$
(680
)
$
4,827
$
3,290
$
59
$
3,349
$
4,256
$
1,092
$
5,348
$
2,694
$
$
2,694
$
3,788
$
370
$
4,158
$
4,326
$
6
$
4,332
12.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies how uncertain tax
positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken on a companys tax return should
be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. The cumulative
effect of applying this pronouncement to uncertain tax positions at the date of adoption
will be recorded during the fiscal year beginning February 1, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
Table of Contents
For the Three Months Ended
For the Six Months Ended
July 31,
July 31,
2006
2005
2006
2005
(in thousands)
$
8,268
$
6,529
$
19,083
$
14,167
2,691
473
5,991
473
10,959
7,002
25,074
14,640
4,309
3,550
9,230
6,940
1,518
210
3,415
210
5,827
3,760
12,645
7,150
5,132
3,242
12,429
7,490
3,829
2,233
7,363
4,186
309
76
607
152
4,138
2,309
7,970
4,338
$
994
$
933
$
4,459
$
3,152
$
3,138
$
3,089
$
8,651
$
7,486
$
3,635
$
3,118
$
9,445
$
7,551
$
1,253
$
1,239
$
4,692
$
3,381
(186
)
(111
)
(334
)
(195
)
2,120
2,155
4,158
4,332
(49
)
(194
)
135
(32
)
3,138
3,089
8,651
7,486
497
29
794
65
$
3,635
$
3,118
$
9,445
$
7,551
(1)
EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before (i) depreciation and
amortization, (ii) interest income, net of interest expense and (iii) provision for (or benefit
from) income taxes. Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation. We consider EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to be important indicators for the performance of our business, but not measures of
performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (GAAP). We have included these non-GAAP financial measures because they provide management
with important information for assessing our performance and as indicators of our ability to make
capital expenditures and finance working capital requirements. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not
measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as
alternatives to cash flow from operating activities or as alternatives to net income as indicators
of operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP.
Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA or Adjusted
Table of Contents
EBITDA differently than we do and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable with similarly
titled measures reported by other companies.
Table of Contents
For the Three
For the Six
Months Ended
Months Ended
July 31,
July 31,
2006
2005
2006
2005
45
%
68
%
48
%
75
%
4
14
12
11
51
18
40
14
100
100
100
100
5
9
5
8
16
30
14
29
1
4
7
3
31
11
24
9
53
54
50
49
47
46
50
51
35
32
30
29
3
1
2
1
38
33
32
30
9
13
18
21
2
2
1
1
11
15
19
22
3
(1
)
11
%
18
%
18
%
22
%
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
taxable income projections in future years;
whether the carry forward period is so brief that it would limit realization of tax benefits;
future sales and operating cost projections that will produce more than enough taxable
income to realize the deferred tax asset based on existing sales prices and cost
structures; and
our earnings history exclusive of the loss that created the future deductible amount
coupled with evidence indicating that the loss is an aberration rather than a continuing
condition.
the current level of worldwide oil and gas exploration activities resulting from
historically high prices for oil and natural gas;
increasing world demand for oil;
our anticipated positive income in certain jurisdictions; and
our existing customer relationships.
the risk of the world oil supply increasing, thereby depressing the price of oil and natural gas;
the risk of decreased global demand for oil; and
the potential for increased competition in the seismic equipment leasing and sales business.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Name of Nominee
For
Withheld
8,711,417
49,819
8,509,103
252,133
8,509,803
251,433
8,605,000
156,236
8,620,285
140,951
For
Against
Abstaining
Broker Non-Votes
1,938,604
27,529
4,415,120
For
Against
Abstaining
8,662,281
53,951
45,004
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mitcham Industries, Inc.
(1)
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mitcham Industries, Inc.
(2)
Separation Agreement, dated June 26, 2006 between Michael A. Pugh and Mitcham
Industries, Inc.*
Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock Awards Plan
(3)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Mitcham Industries, Inc.
Stock Award Plan*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock Award
Plan*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock
Award Plan*
Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Certification of Robert P. Capps, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Robert P. Capps, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,.
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
(1)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-67208), filed with the SEC on August 9, 2001.
Table of Contents
(2)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on May 28, 2004.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Companys proxy statement for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on May 31, 2006.
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Date: September 12, 2006
/s/ Robert P. Capps
Robert P. Capps
Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer)
Table of Contents
Description
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mitcham Industries, Inc.
(1)
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mitcham Industries, Inc.
(2)
Separation Agreement, dated June 26, 2006 between Michael A. Pugh and Mitcham
Industries, Inc.*
Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock Awards Plan
(3)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Mitcham Industries, Inc.
Stock Award Plan*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock Award
Plan*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Mitcham Industries, Inc. Stock
Award Plan*
Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Certification of Robert P. Capps, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Robert P. Capps, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,.
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
(1)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-67208), filed with the SEC on August 9, 2001.
(2)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on May 28, 2004.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Companys proxy statement for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on May 31, 2006.
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
August 22, 2006
|
/s/ Michael Pugh | |
Date
|
MICHAEL PUGH | |
|
||
|
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC. | |
August 23, 2006
|
By /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. | |
Date
|
-6-
Grantee:
|
||||
|
||||
Date of Grant:
|
||||
|
||||
Exercise Price per Share:
|
$ | |||
|
||||
Number of Option Shares Granted:
|
- 2 -
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
By: | |||||||
Name: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Title: | ||||||||
|
|
- 3 -
Grantee:
|
||||
|
||||
Date of Grant:
|
||||
|
||||
Number of Restricted Shares Granted:
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Period and Goals:
|
See Attachment A |
- 2 -
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
By: | |||||||
Name: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Title: | ||||||||
|
|
- 3 -
Grantee:
|
||||
|
||||
Date of Grant:
|
||||
|
||||
Exercise Price per Share:
|
$ | |||
|
||||
Number of Option Shares Granted:
|
- 2 -
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
By: | |||||||
Name: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Title: | ||||||||
|
|
- 3 -
/s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
|
||
|
||
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
September 12, 2006
|
/s/ Robert P. Capps
|
||
|
||
Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
September 12, 2006
|
(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | ||
(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
|
||
|
||
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
September 12, 2006
|
(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | ||
(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Robert P. Capps
|
||
|
||
Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
September 12, 2006
|