SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
Commission file number: 0-24047
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 or
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to .
MARYLAND | 52-1782444 | |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer | |
of incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
101 Crain Highway, S.E., Glen Burnie, Maryland | 21061 | |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
Registrants telephone number, including area code | (410) 766-3300 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |||
None
|
None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Class
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
Common Stock Purchase Rights
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 19, 2002 was $23,542,494.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 13, 2002 was 1,663,560.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
To the extent specified, Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates information by reference to the Registrants definitive proxy statement for its 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (to be filed).
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
2002 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
Page | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
PART I
|
|||||||||||
Item 1. |
Business
|
3 | |||||||||
Item 2. |
Properties
|
16 | |||||||||
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings
|
16 | |||||||||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders
|
17 | |||||||||
Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
17 | ||||||||||
PART II
|
|||||||||||
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
18 | |||||||||
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data
|
19 | |||||||||
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations
|
20 | |||||||||
Item 7A. |
Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
26 | |||||||||
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
26 | |||||||||
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountant
on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
|
26 | |||||||||
PART III
|
|||||||||||
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
27 | |||||||||
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation
|
27 | |||||||||
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management
|
27 | |||||||||
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
27 | |||||||||
PART IV
|
|||||||||||
Item 14. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
|
28 | |||||||||
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Glen Burnie Bancorp (the Company) is a bank holding company organized in
1990 under the laws of the State of Maryland. It presently owns all the
outstanding shares of capital stock of The Bank of Glen Burnie (the Bank), a
commercial bank organized in 1949 under the laws of the State of Maryland,
serving northern Anne Arundel County and surrounding areas from its main office
and branch in Glen Burnie, Maryland and branch offices in Glen Burnie (South
Crain location) Odenton, Riviera Beach, Crownsville, Severn and Severna Park,
Maryland. The Bank also maintains four remote Automated Teller Machine (ATM)
locations in Ferndale, Gambrills, Jessup and Pasadena, Maryland. The Bank
maintains a website at www.thebankofglenburnie.com. The Bank is the oldest
independent commercial bank in Anne Arundel County. The Bank is engaged in the
commercial and retail banking business as authorized by the banking statutes of
the State of Maryland, including the acceptance of demand and time deposits,
and the origination of loans to individuals, associations, partnerships and
corporations. The Banks real estate financing consists of residential first
and second mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and commercial mortgage
loans. Commercial lending consists of both secured and unsecured loans. The
Bank also originates automobile loans through arrangements with local
automobile dealers. The Banks deposits are insured up to applicable limits by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
The Companys principal executive office is located at 101 Crain Highway,
S.E., Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061. Its telephone number at such office is (410)
766-3300.
Market Area
The Bank considers its principal market area for lending and deposit
products to consist of Northern Anne Arundel County, Maryland, which consists
of those portions of the county north of U.S. Route 50. Northern Anne Arundel
County includes mature suburbs of the City of Baltimore, which in recent years
have experienced modest population growth and are characterized by an aging
population. Management believes that the majority of the working population in
its market area either commutes to Baltimore or is employed at businesses
located at or around the nearby Baltimore Washington International Airport.
Anne Arundel County is generally considered to have more affordable housing
than other suburban Baltimore areas and has begun to attract younger persons
and minorities on this basis. This inflow, however, has not been sufficient to
affect current population trends.
Lending Activities
The Bank offers a full range of consumer and commercial loans. The Banks
lending activities include residential and commercial real estate loans,
construction loans, land acquisition and development loans, commercial loans
and consumer installment lending including indirect automobile lending.
Substantially all of the Banks loan customers are residents of Anne Arundel
County and surrounding areas of Central Maryland. The Bank solicits loan
applications for commercial loans from small to medium sized businesses located
in its market area. The Bank believes that this is a market in which a
relatively small community bank, like the Bank, has a competitive advantage in
personal service and flexibility. The Banks consumer lending currently
consists primarily of automobile loans originated through local dealers. The
Bank has expanded its indirect automobile loans by entering into arrangements
with individual automobile dealers.
The Companys total loan portfolio increased during the 2000, 1999 and
1998 fiscal years, primarily as a result of the introduction of an indirect
automobile lending program in 1998. The commercial mortgage portfolio, which
had been slowly declining over the last several years, steeply declined in 2001
as a result of softening loan demand. In contrast, the residential mortgage
portfolio achieved a large increase as a result of stronger than expected
demand due to refinancings.
-3-
The following table provides information on the composition of the loan
portfolio at the indicated dates.
The following table sets forth the maturities for various categories of
the loan portfolio at December 31, 2001. Demand loans and loans, which have no
stated maturity, are treated as due in one year or less. At December 31, 2001,
the Bank had $10,469,877 in loans due after one year with variable rates and
$143,609,922 in such loans with fixed rates. The Banks long-term real estate
loans allow the Bank to call the loan after three years in order to adjust the
interest rate if necessary. The Bank has generally not exercised its call
option and the following table assumes no exercise of the Banks call option.
Real Estate Lending.
The Bank offers long-term mortgage financing for
residential and commercial real estate as well as shorter term construction and
land development loans. Residential mortgage and residential construction
loans are originated with fixed rates while commercial mortgages may be
originated on either a fixed or variable rate basis. Commercial construction
loans are generally originated on a variable rate basis. The Banks long-term,
fixed-rate mortgages include a provision allowing the Bank to call the loan
after three years in order to adjust the interest rate. The Bank, however, has
never exercised this right. Substantially all of the Banks real estate loans
are secured by properties in northern Anne Arundel County, Maryland. Under the
Banks loan policies, the maximum permissible loan-to-value ratio for
owner-occupied residential mortgages is 80% of the lesser of the purchase price
or appraised value. The Bank, however, will make loans secured by
owner-occupied residential real estate with loan-to-value ratios up to 95%
provided the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance for the portion of the
loan in excess of 80%. For residential investment properties, the maximum
loan-to-value ratio is 75%. The maximum permissible loan-to-value ratio for
residential and commercial construction loans is 80%. The maximum
loan-to-value ratio for permanent commercial mortgages is 75%. The maximum
loan-to-value ratio for land development loans is 70% and for unimproved land
is 65%. The Bank also offers home equity loans secured by the borrowers
primary residence provided that the aggregate indebtedness on the property does
not exceed 80% of its value.
-4-
Commercial Lending.
The Banks commercial loan portfolio consists
principally of demand and time loans for commercial purposes. The Banks
business demand and time lending includes various working capital loans, lines
of credit and letters of credit for commercial customers. Demand loans require
the payment of interest
until called, while time loans require a single payment of principal and
interest at maturity. Such loans may be made on a secured or an unsecured
basis. All such loans are underwritten on the basis of the borrowers
creditworthiness rather than the value of the collateral.
Installment Lending.
The Bank makes consumer and commercial installment
loans for the purchase of automobiles, boats, other consumer durable goods,
capital goods and equipment. Such loans provide for repayment in regular
installments and are secured by the goods financed. Also included in
installment loans are overdraft loans and other credit repayable in
installments. As of December 31, 2001, approximately 65.4% of the installment
loans in the Banks portfolio (other than indirect automobile lending) had been
originated for commercial purposes and 34.6% had been originated for consumer
purposes.
Indirect Automobile Lending.
The Bank commenced its indirect automobile
lending program in January 1998. The Bank finances new and used automobiles
for terms of up to 60 months. Used vehicles must be no more than five years
old and the maximum loan term is reduced for higher mileage vehicles. The Bank
does not lend more than the invoice price on new vehicles and on used vehicles
will not lend more than the fair market value as published in a nationally
recognized used vehicle pricing guide. The Bank requires all borrowers to
obtain vendors single interest coverage protecting the Bank against loss. The
Bank originates indirect loans through a network of 21 dealers which are
primarily new car dealers located in Anne Arundel County. Participating
dealers take loan applications from their customers and transmit them to the
Bank for approval. If the loan is approved, the Bank will immediately fund the
principal of the loan and credit the dealers reserve account for the premium
due to the dealer. Funds are disbursed from the dealer reserve account on a
monthly basis net of any unpaid interest resulting from borrower prepayments or
defaults on other loans purchased from the dealer. The Bank does not offer
dealer floor plan financing.
Credit Card and Related Loans.
Credit card and related loans consist of
outstanding balances on credit cards and overdraft lines of credit. The Bank
offered no annual fee VISA® and MasterCard® credit cards to qualified
customers. Credit card billing and payment processing was done for the Bank by
an unaffiliated third party which received a fee for such services. In
February, 2000, however, the Bank sold its portfolio of credit card loans. The
Banks overdraft protection line of credit is offered as a convenience to
qualified customers.
Although the risk of non-payment for any reason exists with respect to all
loans, certain other specific risks are associated with each type of loan. The
primary risks associated with commercial loans, including commercial real
estate loans, are the quality of the borrowers management and a number of
economic and other factors which induce business failures and depreciate the
value of business assets pledged to secure the loan, including competition,
insufficient capital, product obsolescence, changes in the cost of production,
environmental hazards, weather, changes in laws and regulations and general
changes in the marketplace. Primary risks associated with residential real
estate loans include fluctuating land and property values and rising interest
rates with respect to fixed-rate, long-term loans. Residential construction
lending exposes the Company to risks related to builder performance. Consumer
loans, including indirect automobile loans, are affected primarily by domestic
instability and a variety of factors that may lead to the borrowers
unemployment, including deteriorating economic conditions in one or more
segments of a local or broader economy. Because the Bank deals with borrowers
through an intermediary on indirect automobile loans, this form of lending
potentially carries greater risks of defects in the application process for
which claims may be made against the Bank. Indirect automobile lending may
also involve the Bank in consumer disputes under state lemon or other laws.
The Bank seeks to control these risks by following strict underwriting and
documentation guidelines and by only dealing with well-established dealerships
who are contractually obligated to indemnify the Bank for such losses.
The Banks lending activities are conducted pursuant to written policies
approved by the Board of Directors intended to ensure proper management of
credit risk. Loans are subject to a well defined credit process that includes
credit evaluation of borrowers, establishment of lending limits and application
of lending procedures, including the holding of adequate collateral and the
maintenance of compensating balances, as well as procedures for on-going
identification and management of credit deterioration. Regular portfolio
reviews are performed by the Senior Credit
-5-
Officer to identify potential
underperforming credits, estimate loss exposure and to ascertain compliance
with the Banks policies. On a quarterly basis, the internal auditor performs
an independent loan review in accordance with the Banks loan review policy.
For significant problem loans, management review consists of evaluation of the
financial strengths of the borrower and the guarantor, the related collateral,
and the effects of economic conditions.
The Banks loan approval policy provides for various levels of individual
lending authority. The maximum lending authority granted by the Bank to any
one individual is $500,000. A combination of approvals from certain officers
may be used to lend up to an aggregate of $750,000. The Banks Executive
Committee is authorized to approve loans up to $1.0 million. Larger loans must
be approved by the full Board of Directors.
Under Maryland law, the maximum amount which the Bank is permitted to lend
to any one borrower and their related interests may generally not exceed 10% of
the Banks unimpaired capital and surplus which is defined to include the
Banks capital, surplus, retained earnings and 50% of its reserve for possible
loan losses. Under this authority, the Bank would have been permitted to lend
up to $2.37 million to any one borrower at December 31, 2001. By interpretive
ruling of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation, Maryland banks have the
option of lending up to the amount that would be permissible for a national
bank which is generally 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus (defined to
include a banks total capital for regulatory capital purposes plus any loan
loss allowances not included in regulatory capital). Under this formula, the
Bank would have been permitted to lend up to $3.78 million to any one borrower
at December 31, 2001. It is currently the Banks policy to limit its exposure
to any one borrower to no more than $2.37 million in the aggregate unless the
loan is approved by a 75% vote of the Board of Directors with respect to new
borrowings. At December 31, 2001, the largest amount outstanding to any one
borrower and their related interests was $2,432,000 which was within the Banks
lending limit at the time when made.
Non-Performing Loans
It is the policy of the Bank to discontinue the accrual of interest when a
loan becomes 90 days or more delinquent and circumstances indicate that
collection is doubtful.
The Bank seeks to control delinquencies through diligent collection
procedures. For consumer loans, the Bank sends out payment reminders on the
seventh and twelfth days after a payment is due. If a consumer loan becomes 15
days past due, the account is transferred to the Banks collections department,
which will contact the borrower by telephone and letter before the account
becomes 30 days past due. If a consumer loan becomes more than 30 days past
due, the Bank will continue its collection efforts and will move to
repossession or foreclosure by the 45th day if the Bank has reason to believe
that the collateral may be in jeopardy or the borrower has failed to respond to
prior communications. The Bank will move to repossess or foreclose in all
instances in which a consumer loan becomes more than 60 days delinquent. After
repossession of a motor vehicle, the borrower has a 15-day statutory right to
redeem the vehicle and is entitled to 10 days notice before the sale of a
repossessed vehicle. The Bank sells the vehicle as promptly as feasible after
the expiration of these periods. If the amount realized from the sale of the
vehicle is less than the loan amount, the Bank will seek a deficiency judgment
against the borrower. The Bank follows similar collection procedures with
respect to commercial loans.
-6-
The following table sets forth the amount of the Banks restructured
loans, non-accrual loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due at the
dates indicated:
For the year ended December 31, 2001, interest of approximately $14,877,
would have been accrued on non-accrual loans if such loans had been current in
accordance with their original terms. During such period there was no interest
on such loans included in income. Approximately $561,494 or 93.4%, of the
Banks non-accrual loans at December 31, 2001 were attributable to 11
borrowers. No charge-offs have previously been taken on these loans. Six of
these borrowers with loans totaling $482,029 were in bankruptcy at that date.
Because of the legal protections afforded to borrowers in bankruptcy,
collections on such loans are difficult and the Bank anticipates that such
loans may remain delinquent for an extended period of time. Each of these loans
is secured by collateral with a value well in excess of the current active
balance of the Banks loan.
At December 31, 2001, there were no loans outstanding not reflected in the
above table as to which known information about possible credit problems of
borrowers caused management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such
borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms. Such loans consist of
loans which were not 90 days or more past due but where the borrower is in
bankruptcy or has a history of delinquency or the loan to value ratio is
considered excessive due to deterioration of the collateral or other factors.
-7-
At December 31, 2001, the Company had $420,162 in real estate acquired in
partial or total satisfaction of debt compared to $484,148 and $558,827 in such
properties at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. All such properties are
recorded at the lower of cost or fair value at the date acquired and carried on
the balance sheet as other real estate owned. Losses arising at the date of
acquisition are charged against the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent
write-downs that may be required and expense of operation are included in
non-interest expense. Gains and losses realized from the sale of other real
estate owned are included in non-interest income or expense. For a description
of the properties comprising other real estate owned at December 31, 2001, see
Item 2. Properties.
Allowance For Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for
credit losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for
credit losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal
is unlikely. The allowance, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans
and prior loan loss experience, is an amount that management believes will be
adequate to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become
uncollectible. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes
in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality,
review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions and trends
that may affect the borrowers ability to pay.
Transactions in the allowance for credit losses during the last five fiscal
years were as follows:
-8-
The following table shows the allowance for credit losses broken down by loan
category as of December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997:
Investment Securities
The Bank maintains a substantial portfolio of investment securities to
provide liquidity as well as a source of earnings. The Banks investment
securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. Treasury securities, securities
issued by U.S. Government agencies including mortgage-backed securities,
securities issued by certain states and their political subdivisions, and
corporate trust preferred securities. The portfolio of securities issued by
certain states and their political subdivisions has recently been increased due
to a change in the Companys deferred tax position allowing the Company to use
the full tax advantage of this portfolio.
The following table presents at amortized cost the composition of the
investment portfolio by major category at the dates indicated.
-9-
The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities, book values and
weighted average yields for the Companys investment securities portfolio at
December 31, 2001:
At December 31, 2001, the Bank had no investments in securities of a
single issuer (other than the U.S. Government securities and securities of
federal agencies and government-sponsored enterprises, and a $2 million
investment in Floating Rate Mezzanine Notes issued by Preferred Term Securities
III) which aggregated more than 10% of stockholders equity.
Deposits And Other Sources Of Funds
The funds needed by the Bank to make loans are primarily generated by
deposit accounts solicited from the communities surrounding its main office and
six branches in northern Anne Arundel County. Consolidated total deposits were
$229,306,718 as of December 31, 2001. The Bank uses borrowings from the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Atlanta to supplement funding from deposits. The
Bank was permitted to borrow up to $31.6 million under a line of credit from
the FHLB of Atlanta as of December 31, 2001.
Deposits.
The Banks deposit products include regular savings accounts
(statements), money market deposit accounts, demand deposit accounts, NOW
checking accounts, IRA and SEP accounts, Christmas Club accounts and
certificates of deposit. Variations in service charges, terms and interest
rates are used to target specific markets. Ancillary products and services for
deposit customers include safe deposit boxes, money orders and travelers
checks, night depositories, automated clearinghouse transactions, wire
transfers, ATMs, telephone banking, and a customer call center. The Bank is a
member of the Cirrus® and Star® ATM networks.
The Bank obtains deposits principally through its network of seven
offices. The Bank does not solicit brokered deposits. At December 31, 2001, the
Bank had approximately $21 million in certificates of deposit and other time
deposits of $100,000 or more, including IRA accounts. The following table
provides information as to the maturity of all time deposits of $100,000 or
more at December 31, 2001:
Borrowings.
In addition to deposits, the Bank from time to time obtains
advances from the FHLB of Atlanta of which it is a member. FHLB of Atlanta
advances may be used to provide funds for residential housing finance, for
small business lending, and to meet specific and anticipated needs. The Bank
may draw on a $31.6 million line of credit from the FHLB of Atlanta, which is
secured by a floating lien on the Banks residential first mortgage loans and
various federal and agency securities. There was $7 million in a long-term
convertible advance under this credit arrangement at December 31, 2001. The
advance matures in September 2010 and bears a 5.84%
-10-
rate of interest. On
September 7, 2000, the Company issued $5,155,000 of its 10.6% Junior
Subordinated Deferrable
Interest Debentures to Glen Burnie Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut
statutory trust wholly owned by the Company. The Trust, in turn, issued
$5,000,000 of its 10.6% capital securities to institutional investors. The
debentures are scheduled to mature on September 7, 2030, unless called by the
Company not earlier than September 7, 2010. The Bank also has a secured line of
credit in the amount of
$
5.0 million from another commercial bank but has not
drawn on this line. The Bank has a mortgage note on the 103 Crain Highway
address of $274,791, as of December 31, 2001. This note is payable monthly
through October 2010 and has a 7% interest rate.
Competition
The Bank faces competition from other community banks and financial
institutions and larger intra- and inter- state banks and financial
institutions, which compete vigorously (currently, sixteen FDIC-insured
depository institutions operate within two miles of the Banks headquarters).
In 1996, former directors of the Bank, including a former Chief Executive
Officer, established a new bank with a main office in Glen Burnie close to the
Banks headquarters which has solicited business from many Bank customers. With
respect to indirect lending, the Bank faces competition from other banks and
the financing arms of automobile manufacturers. The Bank competes in this area
by offering competitive rates and responsive service to dealers.
The Banks interest rates, loan and deposit terms, and offered products
and services are impacted, to a large extent, by such competition. The Bank
attempts to provide superior service within its community and to know, and
facilitate services to, its customers. It seeks commercial relationships with
small to medium size businesses, which the Bank believes would welcome personal
service and flexibility. While the Bank believes it is the eighth largest
deposit holder in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, with an estimated 4.68% market
share as of June 30, 2000 (the latest date for which relevant data is available
from the FDIC), it believes its greatest competition comes from smaller
community banks which offer similar personalized services.
Other Activities
The Company also owns all outstanding shares of capital stock of GBB
Properties, Inc. (GBB), another Maryland corporation which was organized in
1994 and which is engaged in the business of acquiring, holding and disposing
of real property, typically acquired in connection with foreclosure proceedings
(or deeds in lieu of foreclosure) instituted by the Bank or acquired in
connection with branch expansions by the Bank.
Employees
At December 31, 2001, the Bank had 124 full-time equivalent employees.
Neither the Company nor GBB currently has any employees.
Regulation of the Company
General.
The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the BHCA). As such, the Company is
registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
Federal Reserve Board) and subject to Federal Reserve Board regulation,
examination, supervision and reporting requirements. As a bank holding company,
the Company is required to furnish to the Federal Reserve Board annual and
quarterly reports of its operations at the end of each period and to furnish
such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant
to the BHCA. The Company is also subject to regular inspection by Federal
Reserve Board examiners.
Under the BHCA, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of
the Federal Reserve Board before: (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or
control of any voting shares of any bank or bank holding company if, after such
acquisition, the bank holding company would directly or indirectly own or
control more than 5% of such shares; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of
the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (3) merging or
consolidating with another bank holding company.
Effective September 29, 1995, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and
Branching Efficiency of 1994 (the Riegle-Neal Act) authorized the Federal
Reserve Board to approve an application of an adequately capitalized and
-11-
adequately managed bank holding company to acquire control of, or acquire all
or substantially all of the assets of, a bank located in a state other than
such holding companys home state, without regard to whether the transaction is
prohibited by the laws of any state. The Federal Reserve Board may not
approve the acquisition of a bank that has not been in existence for the
minimum time period (not exceeding five years) specified by the statutory law
of the host state. The Riegle-Neal Act also prohibits the Federal Reserve Board
from approving such an application if the applicant (and its depository
institution affiliates) controls or would control more than 10% of the insured
deposits in the United States or 30% or more of the deposits in the target
banks home state or in any state in which the target bank maintains a branch.
The Riegle-Neal Act does not affect the authority of states to limit the
percentage of total insured deposits in the state which may be held or
controlled by a bank or bank holding company to the extent such limitation does
not discriminate against out-of-state banks or bank holding companies.
Individual states may also waive the 30% state-wide concentration limit
contained in the Riegle-Neal Act. Under Maryland law, a bank holding company is
prohibited from acquiring control of any bank if the bank holding company would
control more than 30% of the total deposits of all depository institutions in
the State of Maryland unless waived by the Commissioner of Financial
Regulation.
Additionally, the federal banking agencies are authorized to approve
interstate merger transactions without regard to whether such transaction is
prohibited by the law of any state, unless the home state of one of the banks
opted out of the Riegle-Neal Act by adopting a law after the date of enactment
of the Riegle-Neal Act and prior to June 1, 1997 which applies equally to all
out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger transactions involving
out-of-state banks. The State of Maryland did not pass such a law during this
period. Interstate acquisitions of branches will be permitted only if the law
of the state in which the branch is located permits such acquisitions.
Interstate mergers and branch acquisitions will also be subject to the
nationwide and statewide insured deposit concentration amounts described above.
The BHCA also prohibits, with certain exceptions, a bank holding company
from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the
voting shares of a company that is not a bank or a bank holding company, or
from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking,
managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The
principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities
which, by statute or by Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, have been
identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or managing
or controlling banks. The activities of the Company are subject to these legal
and regulatory limitations under the BHCA and the Federal Reserve Boards
regulations thereunder. Notwithstanding the Federal Reserve Boards prior
approval of specific nonbanking activities, the Federal Reserve Board has the
power to order a holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity,
or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary, when it has
reasonable cause to believe that the continuation of such activity or such
ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety,
soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that holding company.
Effective with the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (G-L-B) on
November 12, 1999, bank holding companies whose financial institution
subsidiaries are well capitalized and well managed and have satisfactory
Community Reinvestment Act records can elect to become financial holding
companies which will be permitted to engage in a broader range of financial
activities than are currently permitted to bank holding companies. Financial
holding companies are authorized to engage in, directly or indirectly,
financial activities. A financial activity is an activity that is: (i)
financial in nature; (ii) incidental to an activity that is financial in
nature; or (iii) complementary to a financial activity and that does not pose a
safety and soundness risk. The G-L-B Act includes a list of activities that are
deemed to be financial in nature. Other activities also may be decided by the
Federal Reserve Board to be financial in nature or incidental thereto if they
meet specified criteria. A financial holding company that intends to engage in
a new activity to acquire a company to engage in such an activity is required
to give prior notice to the Federal Reserve Board. If the activity is not
either specified in the G-L-B Act as being a financial activity or one that the
Federal Reserve Board has determined by rule or regulation to be financial in
nature, the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board is required.
The Maryland Financial Institutions Code prohibits a bank holding company
from acquiring more than 5% of any class of voting stock of a bank or bank
holding company without the approval of the Commissioner of Financial
Regulation except as otherwise expressly permitted by federal law or in certain
other limited situations. The Maryland Financial Institutions Code additionally
prohibits any person from acquiring voting stock in a bank or bank holding
company without 60 days prior notice to the Commissioner if such acquisition
will give the person
-12-
control of 25% or more of the voting stock of the bank or
bank holding company or will affect the power to direct or to cause the
direction of the policy or management of the bank or bank holding company. Any
doubt whether the stock acquisition will affect the power to direct or cause
the direction of policy or management shall be resolved in
favor of reporting to the Commissioner. The Commissioner may deny approval
of the acquisition if the Commissioner determines it to be anti-competitive or
to threaten the safety or soundness of a banking institution. Voting stock
acquired in violation of this statute may not be voted for five years.
Capital Adequacy.
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted guidelines
regarding the capital adequacy of bank holding companies, which require bank
holding companies to maintain specified minimum ratios of capital to total
assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. See Regulation of the Bank
Capital Adequacy.
Dividends and Distributions.
The Federal Reserve Board has the power to
prohibit dividends by bank holding companies if their actions constitute unsafe
or unsound practices. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement
on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the
Federal Reserve Boards view that a bank holding company should pay cash
dividends only to the extent that the companys net income for the past year is
sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earning retention
that is consistent with the companys capital needs, asset quality, and overall
financial condition.
Bank holding companies are required to give the Federal Reserve Board
notice of any purchase or redemption of their outstanding equity securities if
the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the
net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the
preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the bank holding companys
consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a
purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would violate any
law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order, directive, or any condition
imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. Bank holding
companies whose capital ratios exceed the thresholds for well capitalized
banks on a consolidated basis are exempt from the foregoing requirement if they
were rated composite 1 or 2 in their most recent inspection and are not the
subject of any unresolved supervisory issues.
Regulation of the Bank
General.
As a state-chartered bank with deposits insured by the FDIC but
which is not a member of the Federal Reserve System (a state non-member
bank), the Bank is subject to the supervision of the Commissioner of Financial
Regulation and the FDIC. The Commissioner and FDIC regularly examine the
operations of the Bank, including but not limited to capital adequacy,
reserves, loans, investments and management practices. These examinations are
for the protection of the Banks depositors and not its stockholders. In
addition, the Bank is required to furnish quarterly and annual call reports to
the Commissioner and FDIC. The FDICs enforcement authority includes the power
to remove officers and directors and the authority to issue cease-and-desist
orders to prevent a bank from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices or
violating laws or regulations governing its business.
The Banks deposits are insured by the FDIC to the legal maximum of
$100,000 for each insured depositor. Some of the aspects of the lending and
deposit business of the Bank that are subject to regulation by the Federal
Reserve Board and the FDIC include reserve requirements and disclosure
requirements in connection with personal and mortgage loans and savings deposit
accounts. In addition, the Bank is subject to numerous Federal and state laws
and regulations which set forth specific restrictions and procedural
requirements with respect to the establishment of branches, investments,
interest rates on loans, credit practices, the disclosure of credit terms and
discrimination in credit transactions.
Capital Adequacy.
The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have established
guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by
bank holding companies and state non-member banks, respectively. The
regulations impose two sets of capital adequacy requirements: minimum leverage
rules, which require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a specified
minimum ratio of capital to total assets, and risk-based capital rules, which
require the maintenance of specified minimum ratios of capital to
risk-weighted assets.
The regulations of the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC require bank
holding companies and state non-member banks, respectively, to maintain a
minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the risk-based
capital guidelines discussed in the following paragraphs) to total assets of
3.0%. Although setting a minimum 3.0%
-13-
leverage ratio, the capital regulations
state that only the strongest bank holding companies and banks, with composite
examination ratings of 1 under the rating system used by the Federal bank
regulators, would be permitted to operate at or near such minimum level of
capital. All other bank holding companies and banks are expected to maintain a
leverage ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the minimum ratio, depending on the
assessment of an
individual organizations capital adequacy by its primary regulator. Any
bank or bank holding company experiencing or anticipating significant growth
would be expected to maintain capital well above the minimum levels. In
addition, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that whenever appropriate,
and in particular when a bank holding company is undertaking expansion, seeking
to engage in new activities or otherwise facing unusual or abnormal risks, it
will consider, on a case-by-case basis, the level of an organizations ratio of
tangible Tier 1 capital (after deducting all intangibles) to total assets in
making an overall assessment of capital.
The risk-based capital rules of the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC
require bank holding companies and state non-member banks, respectively, to
maintain minimum regulatory capital levels based upon a weighting of their
assets and off-balance sheet obligations according to risk. Risk-based capital
is composed of two elements: Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. Tier 1 capital
consists primarily of common stockholders equity, certain perpetual preferred
stock (which must be noncumulative in the case of banks), and minority
interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries; less all
intangible assets, except for certain purchased mortgage servicing rights and
credit card relationships. Tier 2 capital elements include, subject to certain
limitations, the allowance for losses on loans and leases; perpetual preferred
stock that does not qualify as Tier 1 capital and long-term preferred stock
with an original maturity of at least 20 years from issuance; hybrid capital
instruments, including perpetual debt and mandatory convertible securities; and
subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock.
The risk-based capital regulations assign balance sheet assets and credit
equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet obligations to one of four broad risk
categories based principally on the degree of credit risk associated with the
obligor. The assets and off-balance sheet items in the four risk categories are
weighted at 0%, 20%, 50% and 100%. These computations result in the total
risk-weighted assets. The risk-based capital regulations require all banks and
bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital (Tier 1
capital plus Tier 2 capital) to total risk-weighted assets of 8%, with at least
4% as Tier 1 capital. For the purpose of calculating these ratios: (i) Tier 2
capital is limited to no more than 100% of Tier 1 capital; and (ii) the
aggregate amount of certain types of Tier 2 capital is limited. In addition,
the risk-based capital regulations limit the allowance for loan losses
includable as capital to 1.25% of total risk-weighted assets.
FDIC regulations and guidelines additionally specify that state non-member
banks with significant exposure to declines in the economic value of their
capital due to changes in interest rates may be required to maintain higher
risk-based capital ratios. The Federal banking agencies, including the FDIC,
have proposed a system for measuring and assessing the exposure of a banks net
economic value to changes in interest rates. The Federal banking agencies,
including the FDIC, have stated their intention to propose a rule establishing
an explicit capital charge for interest rate risk based upon the level of a
banks measured interest rate risk exposure after more experience has been
gained with the proposed measurement process. Federal Reserve Board regulations
do not specifically take into account interest rate risk in measuring the
capital adequacy of bank holding companies.
The FDIC has issued regulations which classify state non-member banks by
capital levels and which authorize the FDIC to take various prompt corrective
actions to resolve the problems of any bank that fails to satisfy the capital
standards. Under such regulations, a well-capitalized bank is one that is not
subject to any regulatory order or directive to meet any specific capital level
and that has or exceeds the following capital levels: a total risk-based
capital ratio of 10%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6%, and a leverage
ratio of 5%. An adequately capitalized bank is one that does not qualify as
well-capitalized but meets or exceeds the following capital requirements: a
total risk-based capital ratio of 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4%,
and a leverage ratio of either (i) 4% or (ii) 3% if the bank has the highest
composite examination rating. A bank not meeting these criteria is treated as
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized depending on the extent to which the banks capital levels are
below these standards. A state non-member bank that falls within any of the
three undercapitalized categories established by the prompt corrective action
regulation will be subject to severe regulatory sanctions. As of December 31,
2001, the Bank was well capitalized as defined by the FDICs regulations.
Branching.
Maryland law provides that, with the approval of the
Commissioner, Maryland banks may establish branches within the State of
Maryland without geographic restriction and may establish branches in other
-14-
states by any means permitted by the laws of such state or by federal law. The
Riegle-Neal Act authorizes the FDIC to approve interstate branching de novo by
state banks, only in states which specifically allow for such branching. The
Riegle-Neal Act also requires the appropriate federal banking agencies to
prescribe regulations by June 1, 1997 which prohibit any out-of-state bank from
using the interstate branching authority primarily for the purpose of
deposit production. These regulations must include guidelines to ensure
that interstate branches operated by an out-of-state bank in a host state are
reasonably helping to meet the credit needs of the communities which they
serve.
Dividend Limitations.
Pursuant to the Maryland Financial Institutions
Code, Maryland banks may only pay dividends from undivided profits or, with the
prior approval of the Commissioner, their surplus in excess of 100% of required
capital stock. The Maryland Financial Institutions Code further restricts the
payment of dividends by prohibiting a Maryland bank from declaring a dividend
on its shares of common stock until its surplus fund equals the amount of
required capital stock or, if the surplus fund does not equal the amount of
capital stock, in an amount in excess of 90% of net earnings. In addition, the
Bank is prohibited by federal statute from paying dividends or making any other
capital distribution that would cause the Bank to fail to meet its regulatory
capital requirements. Further, the FDIC also has authority to prohibit the
payment of dividends by a state non-member bank when it determines such payment
to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
Deposit Insurance.
The Bank is required to pay semi-annual assessments
based on a percentage of its insured deposits to the FDIC for insurance of its
deposits by the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF). Under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act, the FDIC is required to set semi-annual assessments for
BIF-insured institutions to maintain the designated reserve ratio of the BIF at
1.25% of estimated insured deposits or at a higher percentage of estimated
insured deposits that the FDIC determines to be justified for that year by
circumstances raising a significant risk of substantial future losses to the
BIF.
Under the risk-based deposit insurance assessment system adopted by the
FDIC, the assessment rate for an insured depository institution depends on the
assessment risk classification assigned to the institution by the FDIC, which
is determined by the institutions capital level and supervisory evaluations.
Based on the data reported to regulators for the date closest to the last day
of the seventh month preceding the semi-annual assessment period, institutions
are assigned to one of three capital groups well capitalized, adequately
capitalized or undercapitalized. Within each capital group, institutions are
assigned to one of three subgroups on the basis of supervisory evaluations by
the institutions primary supervisory authority and such other information as
the FDIC determines to be relevant to the institutions financial condition and
the risk posed to the deposit insurance fund. Under the current assessment
schedule, well-capitalized banks with the best supervisory ratings are not
required to pay any premium for deposit insurance. All BIF-insured banks,
however, will be required to begin paying an assessment to the FDIC in an
amount equal to 2.12 basis points times their assessable deposits to help fund
interest payments on certain bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, an
agency established by the federal government to finance takeovers of insolvent
thrifts.
Transactions With Affiliates.
A state non-member bank or its subsidiaries
may not engage in covered transactions with any one affiliate in an amount
greater than 10% of such banks capital stock and surplus, and for all such
transactions with all affiliates a state non-member bank is limited to an
amount equal to 20% of capital stock and surplus. All such transactions must
also be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the bank
or subsidiary as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term covered
transaction includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a
guarantee and similar other types of transactions. An affiliate of a state
non-member bank is any company or entity which controls or is under common
control with the state non-member bank and, for purposes of the aggregate limit
on transactions with affiliates, any subsidiary that would be deemed a
financial subsidiary of a national bank. In a holding company context, the
parent holding company of a state non-member bank (such as the Company) and any
companies which are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of
the state non-member bank. The BHCA further prohibits a depository institution
from extending credit to or offering any other services, or fixing or varying
the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition
that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or
certain of its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the
institution, subject to certain limited exceptions.
Loans To Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Stockholders.
Loans
to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of a state
non-member bank must be made on substantially the same terms as those
prevailing for comparable transactions with persons who are not executive
officers, directors, principal
-15-
stockholders or employees of the Bank unless the
loan is made pursuant to a compensation or benefit plan that is widely
available to employees and does not favor insiders. Loans to any executive
officer, director and principal stockholder together with all other outstanding
loans to such person and affiliated interests generally may not exceed 15% of
the banks unimpaired capital and surplus and all loans to such persons may not
exceed the institutions unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Loans to
directors, executive officers and principal stockholders, and
their respective affiliates, in excess of the greater of $25,000 or 5% of
capital and surplus (up to $500,000) must be approved in advance by a majority
of the board of directors of the bank with any interested director not
participating in the voting. State non-member banks are prohibited from paying
the overdrafts of any of their executive officers or directors. In addition,
loans to executive officers may not be made on terms more favorable than those
afforded other borrowers and are restricted as to type, amount and terms of
credit.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
Banks offices:
At December 31, 2001, the Bank owned one foreclosed real estate property
with a book value of $285,000. The Bank is holding this commercial property
for sale.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time to time, the Company and the Bank are involved in various legal
actions relating to their business activities. At December 31, 2001, there were
no actions to which the Company or the Bank was a party
-16-
which involved claims
for money damages exceeding 10% of the Companys consolidated current assets in
any one case or in any group of proceedings presenting in large degree the same
legal and factual issues.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY-HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Set forth below is information about the Companys executive officers.
F. WILLIAM KUETHE, JR. has been President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and the Bank since 1995. He also was director of the Bank from 1963
through 1989. He was President of Glen Burnie Mutual Savings Bank from 1960
through 1995. Mr. Kuethe is a former licensed appraiser and real estate broker
with banking experience from 1960 to present, at all levels. He is the father
of Frederick W. Kuethe, III, a director of the Company.
JOHN I. YOUNG was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Bank in December 1999 after joining the Bank as Senior Vice
President in March 1999. Prior to joining the Bank, he had been president of
Young-Harris, Inc., a financial industry consulting company since 1980. Mr.
Young was president of American Bank Services Corp. from January 1977 to 1980
and was Senior Vice President of Operations of Equitable Trust Bank from 1958
until December 1976. Mr. Young is a member of the Independent Bankers
Association of America, the Maryland Bankers Association and an associate
member of the Robert Morris Association. He is also the President of the St.
Andrews Society of Baltimore.
MICHAEL G. LIVINGSTON was appointed Senior Vice President in January 1998
and has been Chief Lending Officer of the Bank since 1996. He was Regional Vice
President and commercial loan officer with Citizens Bank from March 1993 until
April 1996.
JOHN E. PORTER was appointed Senior Vice President in January 1998. He has
been Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 1995 and Vice
President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank since 1990. He has
been Secretary/Treasurer of GBB since 1995.
-17-
At December 31,
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
%
$
%
$
%
$
%
$
%
$
44,293
26.32
%
$
36,187
21.74
%
$
34,099
22.03
%
$
33,931
26.28
%
$
38,048
32.68
%
36,920
21.94
40,169
24.13
42,342
27.36
43,915
34.02
43,276
37.17
2,355
1.40
5,257
3.16
6,095
3.94
2,383
1.85
4,888
4.20
20,063
11.92
19,119
11.49
16,203
10.47
17,119
13.26
18,862
16.20
272
0.16
281
0.16
1,348
0.88
1,398
1.08
1,397
1.20
59,308
35.24
61,725
37.08
50,967
32.93
24,630
19.08
5,083
3.02
3,726
2.24
3,701
2.39
5,714
4.43
9,964
8.56
168,294
100.00
%
166,464
100.00
%
154,755
100.00
%
129,090
100.00
%
116,435
100.00
%
(786
)
(705
)
(727
)
(748
)
(751
)
167,508
165,759
154,028
128,342
115,684
(2,939
)
(3,385
)
(2,922
)
(2,841
)
(4,139
)
$
164,569
$
162,374
$
151,106
$
125,501
$
111,545
Due Within
Due Over One To
Due Over
One Year
Five Years
Five Years
Total
(In Thousands)
$
3,804
$
1,390
$
39,099
$
44,293
1,854
10,921
24,145
36,920
769
741
845
2,355
1,299
13,780
4,984
20,063
224
48
272
352
57,323
1,633
59,308
4,894
133
56
5,083
$
13,196
$
84,288
$
70,810
$
168,294
At December 31,
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
$
370
$
243
$
137
$
344
$
284
$
120
$
237
$
336
$
1,078
189
77
135
505
761
280
316
608
88
72
315
463
665
40
101
45
105
369
601
370
1,012
1,725
3,481
45
34
43
5
13
1
18
59
34
43
18
5
$
660
$
404
$
1,055
$
1,743
$
3,486
0.39
%
0.24
%
0.68
%
1.36
%
2.99
%
445.30
%
837.87
%
276.97
%
162.99
%
118.73
%
Year Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
3,385
$
2,922
$
2,841
$
4,139
$
5,061
19
51
270
4
4
50
(27
)
189
435
498
470
477
473
171
89
101
92
45
96
167
81
382
697
687
761
673
1,095
1,618
52
32
51
25
16
26
17
470
36
1
310
111
259
116
89
53
41
4
4
5
28
550
107
99
290
391
1,224
454
297
426
296
(463
)
219
798
1,192
(150
)
300
(500
)
270
$
2,939
$
3,385
$
2,922
$
2,841
$
4,139
$
163,695
$
159,810
$
142,077
$
118,372
$
119,161
0.18
%
(0.28
)%
0.15
%
0.67
%
1.00
%
At December 31,
2001
2000
Percentage Of Loans In
Percentage Of Loans In
Allowance For
Each Category To
Allowance For
Each Category To
Portfolio
Each Category
Total Loans
Each Category
Total Loans
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
164
26.32
%
$
199
21.74
%
456
21.94
506
24.13
71
1.40
292
3.16
237
11.92
221
11.49
0.16
0.16
1,390
35.24
1,486
37.08
300
3.02
288
2.24
321
393
$
2,939
100.00
%
$
3,385
100.00
%
At December 31,
1999
1998
1997
Percentage Of
Percentage Of
Percentage Of
Loans In Each
Loans In Each
Loans In Each
Allowance For
Category To
Allowance For
Category To
Allowance For
Category To
Portfolio
Each Category
Total Loans
Each Category
Total Loans
Each Category
Total Loans
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
200
22.03
%
$
273
26.28
%
$
389
32.68
%
613
27.36
311
34.02
987
37.17
296
3.94
335
1.85
390
4.20
177
10.47
143
13.26
159
16.20
92
0.88
60
1.08
47
1.20
793
32.93
312
19.08
526
2.39
966
4.43
1,186
8.56
225
441
981
$
2,922
100.00
%
$
2,841
100.00
%
$
4,139
100.00
%
At December 31,
2001
2000
1999
(In Thousands)
$
1,248
$
1,746
$
2,739
45,603
39,057
40,833
20,659
8,721
4,820
2,821
$
72,330
$
52,345
$
43,572
One Year Or Less
One To Five Years
Five to Ten Years
More Than Ten Years
Total
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Book
Average
Book
Average
Book
Average
Book
Average
Book
Average
Value
Yield
Value
Yield
Value
Yield
Value
Yield
Value
Yield
$
749
6.38
%
$
499
5.75
%
$
%
$
%
$
1,248
6.12
%
920
5.50
%
11,484
5.43
%
8,067
5.98
%
25,132
6.36
%
45,603
6.04
%
2,806
3.10
%
2,265
3.89
%
15,588
5.22
%
20,659
4.79
%
1.85
%
4,820
7.61
%
4,820
7.61
%
$
1,669
5.89
%
$
14,789
5.00
%
$
10,332
5.52
%
$
45,540
6.11
%
$
72,330
5.79
%
Amount
(In Thousands)
$
7,601
2,207
2,684
8,876
$
21,368
NAME
AGE
POSITIONS
F. William Kuethe, Jr.
69
President and Chief Executive Officer
John I. Young
64
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer
Michael G. Livingston
48
Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer
John E. Porter
48
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Prior to June 22, 2001, the Companys common stock, par value $1.00 per
share (the Common Stock), was traded in the over-the-counter market and
quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol GLBZ. Since that date, the
Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the same symbol. As
of March 19, 2002, there were 468 record holders of the Common Stock. The
closing price for the Common Stock on that date was $19.75.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the
Common Stock for each full quarterly period during 2001 and 2000 as reported by
Nasdaq and as available through the OTC market. The quotations represent
prices between dealers and do not reflect the retailer markups, markdowns or
commissions, and may not represent actual transactions. Also shown are
dividends declared per share for these periods. Data has been adjusted to give
retroactive effect to a six-for-five stock split effected through a stock
dividend paid on January 11, 2000 and a three-for-two stock split effected
through a stock dividend paid on June 21, 2001.
A regular dividend of $0.10 and a bonus dividend of $.05 were declared for
stockholders of record on December 24, 2001, payable on January 8, 2002.
The Company intends to pay dividends equal to forty percent (40%) of its
profits for each quarter. However, dividends remain subject to declaration by
the Board of Directors in its sole discretion and there can be no assurance
that the Company will be legally or financially able to make such payments.
Payment of dividends may be limited by federal and state regulations which
impose general restrictions on a banks and bank holding companys right to pay
dividends (or to make loans or advances to affiliates which could be used to
pay dividends). Generally, dividend payments are prohibited unless a bank or
bank holding company has sufficient net (or retained) earnings and capital as
determined by its regulators. See Item 1. Business Supervision and
Regulation Regulation of the Company Dividends and Distributions and Item
1. Business Supervision and Regulation Regulation of the Bank Dividend
Limitations. The Company does not believe that those restrictions will
materially limit its ability to pay dividends.
-18-
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents consolidated selected financial data for the
Company and its subsidiaries for each of the periods indicated. Dividends and
earnings per share have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to a
six-for-five stock split effected through a stock dividend paid on January 11,
2000 and a three-for-two stock split effected through a stock dividend paid on
June 21, 2001.
-19-
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
During 2001, the Company continued many favorable operating trends. Most
notably, 2001 saw significant growth in both the Banks deposits and investment
portfolio. Deposit growth in 2001 was strong with increases of $20,616,000 in
interest bearing deposits and $2,723,000 in non-interest bearing demand
deposits. Investment portfolio growth was due primarily to the increase in the
Banks investment in state and municipal bonds which had grown to $20,659,000
by the end of 2001. The Banks net interest income on a tax equivalent basis
improved due to a combination of growth in the securities portfolio and a
continued moderation in deposit costs.
Forward-Looking Statements
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, the words or phrases will likely result, are expected to, will
continue, is anticipated, estimate, project or similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions readers
not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date made, and readers are advised that various factors,
including regional and national economic conditions, unfavorable judicial
decisions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates, credit and
other risks of lending and investment activities and competitive and regulatory
factors could affect the Companys financial performance and could cause the
Companys actual results for future periods to differ materially from those
anticipated or projected.
The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation
to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrence of anticipated
or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
General.
For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company reported
consolidated net income of $1,725,236 ($1.04 basic and diluted earnings per
share) compared to a consolidated net income of $2,274,866 ($1.38 basic and
diluted earnings per share) for the year ended December 31, 2000 and a
consolidated net income of $1,445,350 ($.88 basic and diluted earnings per
share) for the year ended December 31, 1999. (All per share amounts throughout
this report have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to a six-for-five
stock split effected through a stock dividend paid on January 11, 2000 and a
three-for-two stock split effected through a stock dividend paid on June 21,
2001.) Net income for 2000 and 1999 included certain non-recurring items
($2,090,126 for 2000 and $1,311,997 for 1999). Net income adjusted to remove
the effects of these non-recurring items was $1,725,236 for 2001, $991,947 for
2000, and $640,045 for 1999.
Net Interest Income.
The primary component of the Companys net income is
its net interest income, which is the difference between income earned on
assets and interest paid on the deposits and borrowings used to fund them. Net
interest income is determined by the spread between the yields earned on the
Companys interest-earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing
liabilities as well as the relative amounts of such assets and liabilities. Net
interest income, divided by average interest-earning assets, represents the
Companys net interest margin.
Consolidated net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2001 was
$10,673,730 compared to $10,801,098 for the year ended December 31, 2000 and
$9,925,203 for the year ended December 31, 1999. The $127,368 decrease for the
most recent year was due to a decline in interest income on loans combined with
an increase in interest expense for long-term borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures, partially offset by increased interest income on state
and municipal securities and corporate trust preferred securities. Since a
large portion of the Companys portfolio is invested in state and municipal
securities, which are tax advantaged, the after tax net interest income for
2001 was $11,058,205, compared to $10,884,430 for 2000, an increase of $173,775
or 1.60%. The $875,895 increase in net interest income for 2000 over 1999 was
due to an increase in loan income,
-20-
federal funds sold and other interest
income, partially offset by an increase in other interest expense for long-term
borrowing and junior subordinated debt interest expense. The after tax net
interest income for 2000 was $10,885,000, a $950,000 increase (or 9.6%) over
the $9,935,000 after tax net interest income for 1999.
Interest expense increased from $5,901,617 in 2000 to $6,533,274 in 2001,
a $631,657 or 10.7% increase, and increased from $5,623,174 in 1999 to
$5,901,617 in 2000, a $278,443, or 4.95% increase, primarily due to the trust
preferred issuance and the FHLB long-term borrowing in September, 2000. Net
interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2001 was 4.80% compared to
5.27% and 4.96% for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
The following table allocates changes in income and expense attributable
to the Companys interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for
the periods indicated between changes due to changes in rate and changes in
volume. Changes due to rate/volume are allocated to changes due to volume.
-21-
The following table provides information for the designated periods with
respect to the average balances, income and expense and annualized yields and
costs associated with various categories of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
Provision For Credit Losses.
During the year ended December 31, 2001, the
Company made a negative $150,000 provision for credit losses compared to no
provision during the year ended December 31, 2000 and $300,000 during the year
ended December 31, 1999. The negative $150,000 provision for credit losses was
used to create a $150,000 reserve for unfunded commitments. The level of the
provision for 1999 reflects the loan growth during the year. At December 31,
2001, the allowance for loan losses equaled 445.30% of non-accrual and past due
loans compared to 837.87% and 276.97% at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. During the year ended
-22-
December 31, 2001, the Company recorded net charge-offs of $296,360
compared to $463,184 in net recoveries and $219,429 in net charge-offs during
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Other Income.
Other income decreased from $3,657,878 in 2000 to $1,821,138
in 2001, a $1,836,740, or 50.2% decrease. The decrease was largely due to a
gain on foreclosed real estate and a settlement gain on the termination of the
Banks pension plan in 2000 which were not present in 2001, partially offset by
a gain on investment securities of $273,003 in 2001. Other income increased
from $2,827,881 in 1999 to $3,657,878 in 2000, a $829,997, or 29.35% increase.
The increase was due to a $490,000 gain on the sale of a foreclosed property.
In addition, other income for 2000 included the settlement gain of $1,600,126
on the pension plan termination, compared to a non-recurring curtailment gain
in 1999 of $1,311,997 upon termination of the pension plan.
Other Expenses.
Other expenses decreased from $10,746,049 in 2000 to
$10,332,093 in 2001, a $413,956 or 3.85% decrease. This decrease was primarily
due to a decline in employee benefit expense, which relates to the termination
of the Banks defined benefit retirement plan. Other expenses increased from
$9,821,690 in 1999 to $10,746,049 in 2000, a $924,359 or 9.41% increase, due to
an increase in employee benefits and the closing of the Banks Ferndale branch.
Income Taxes.
During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company
recorded income tax expense of $587,539, compared to income tax expense of
$1,438,061 for the year ended December 31, 2000. Part of the 2000 period
income tax expense was due to nonrecurring income realized in 2000 and was
offset, in part, by the tax benefits from the Companys investments in state
and municipal securities. The decreased income tax expense for 2001 was due to
a decline in pretax income and increased investments in state and municipal
securities. During the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company recorded
income tax expense of $1,186,044. The increased income tax expense for 2000 as
compared to 1999 was due to taxes paid as a result of the pension plan
termination and the gain on foreclosed real estate.
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
The Companys total assets increased to $263,361,726 at December 31, 2001
from $239,211,180 at December 31, 2000. The increase in assets during the year
ended December 31, 2001 is a result primarily of growth in the investment
portfolio. The Companys total assets increased to $239,211,180 at December
31, 2000 from $213,439,456 at December 31, 1999. The increase in assets during
the year ended December 31, 2000 is a result primarily of an increase in loans
and investment securities.
The Companys loan portfolio grew to $164,569,252 at December 31, 2001
compared to $162,373,731 at December 31, 2000 and $151,106,560 at December 31,
1999. The growth in the loan portfolio during the 2000 period is attributable
almost entirely to the Banks indirect automobile lending program, which was
introduced in January 1998 and grew to $61,725,204 at December 31, 2000. The
growth in the loan portfolio during the 2001 period is primarily attributable
to growth in residential mortgages, partially offset by a decrease in
commercial mortgages and indirect automobile lending. The decrease in indirect
automobile lending can be at least partially attributed to zero percent
financing offered by automobile manufacturers since September 2001.
During 2001, the Companys total investment securities portfolio
(including both investment securities available for sale and investment
securities held to maturity) totaled $72,064,921, a $19,470,023 or 37%,
increase from $52,594,898 at December 31, 2000. This increase is primarily
attributable to use of increased deposits to increase the Banks investment in
mortgage backed securities and state, county and municipal securities,
partially offset by a decrease in U.S. governmental agency securities. The
Companys total investment securities portfolio total of $52,594,898 at
December 31, 2000, is a $9,272,703 or 21.41% increase from $43,322,195 at
December 31, 1999. The funds for this increase are attributable to the FHLB of
Atlanta borrowing and the Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture
issuance discussed in Liquidity and Capital Resources, below.
Deposits as of December 31, 2001 totaled $229,306,717, an increase of
$23,338,380, or 11.3%, from the $205,968,337 total as of December 31, 2000.
The $205,968,337 total deposits as of December 31, 2000 is a $11,878,342 or
6.12% increase from the $194,089,995 total deposits as of December 31, 1999.
Demand deposits as of December 31, 2001 totaled $55,685,108, a $2,722,617 or
5.1% increase from $52,962,491 at December 31, 2000. NOW and Super NOW
accounts as of December 31, 2001 increased by $2,750,818 or 14.0% from their
2000 level
-23-
to $22,395,703 Money market accounts increased by $3,859,859 or
23.0%, from their 2000 level to total
$20,626,249 December 31, 2001. Savings deposits increased by $2,779,912
or 6.8% from their 2000 level, to $42,483,730 at December 31, 2001. Time
deposits over $100,000 totaled $21,368,319 on December 31, 2001, an increase of
$6,264,032 from December 31, 2000. Other time deposits (made up of
certificates of deposit less than $100,000 and individual retirement accounts)
totaled $66,747,609 on December 31, 2001, a $6,066,253 or a 10.0%, increase
from December 31, 2000.
Total stockholders equity as of December 31, 2001 increased by $680,838
or 3.96% from the 2000 period. The increase was attributed to an increase in
outstanding common stock and retained earnings, offset by a decline in
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company experienced a
$2,078,298, or 13.76% increase in total stockholders equity for the year ended
December 31, 2000 over total stockholders equity as of December 31, 1999. The
increase was attributed to an increase of $306,309 in the unrealized gain in
securities available for sale and an increase of $1,531,134 in retained
earnings.
Asset/Liability Management
Net interest income, the primary component of the Companys net income,
arises from the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the
cost of interest-bearing liabilities and the relative amounts of such assets
and liabilities. The Company manages its assets and liabilities by
coordinating the levels of and gap between interest-rate sensitive assets and
liabilities to minimize changes in net interest income and in the economic
value of its equity despite changes in market interest rates. The Banks
Asset/Liability and Risk Management Committee meets on a monthly basis to
monitor compliance with the Boards objectives. Among other tools used by the
Asset/Liability and Risk Management Committee to monitor interest rate risk is
a gap report which measures the dollar difference between the amount of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities subject to repricing
within a given time period. Generally, during a period of rising interest
rates, a negative gap position would adversely affect net interest income,
while a positive gap would result in an increase in net interest income, while,
conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would
result in an increase in net interest income and a positive gap would adversely
affect net interest income.
During recent periods, the Company has maintained a negative gap position
that has benefited earnings as interest rates have fallen. In order to reduce
its negative gap position, the Company has recently begun investing in
mortgage-backed and other government securities which have rates that adjust to
market rates. The Company also maintains a significant portfolio of
available-for-sale securities that can be quickly converted to more liquid
assets if needed.
-24-
The following table sets forth the Banks interest-rate sensitivity at December
31, 2001.
The foregoing analysis assumes that the Banks assets and liabilities move
with rates at their earliest repricing opportunities based on final maturity.
Mortgage-backed securities are assumed to mature during the period in which
they are estimated to prepay and it is assumed that loans and other securities
are not called prior to maturity. Certificates of deposit and IRA accounts are
presumed to reprice at maturity. NOW savings accounts are assumed to reprice
within three months although it is the Companys experience that such accounts
may be less sensitive to changes in market rates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company currently has no business other than that of the Bank and does
not currently have any material funding commitments. The Companys principal
sources of liquidity are cash on hand and dividends received from the Bank.
The Bank is subject to various regulatory restrictions on the payment of
dividends.
The Banks principal sources of funds for investments and operations are
net income, deposits from its primary market area, principal and interest
payments on loans, interest received on investment securities and proceeds from
maturing investment securities. Its principal funding commitments are for the
origination or purchase of loans and the payment of maturing deposits.
Deposits are considered the primary source of funds supporting the Banks
lending and investment activities. The Bank also uses borrowings from the FHLB
of Atlanta to supplement deposits, residential and small business lending, and
to meet specific and anticipated needs.
The Banks most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which are
cash on hand, amounts due from financial institutions, federal funds sold and
money market mutual funds. The levels of such assets are dependent on the
Banks operating financing and investment activities at any given time. The
variations in levels of cash and cash equivalents are influenced by deposit
flows and anticipated future deposit flows.
Cash and cash equivalents (cash due from banks, interest-bearing deposits
in other financial institutions, and federal funds sold), as of December 31,
2001, totaled $18,220,828, an increase of $2,711,689 or 17.5%, from
-25-
the
December 31, 2000 total of $15,509,139. Most of this increase was due to an
increase in deposits in other financial institutions.
As of December 31, 2001, the Bank was permitted to draw on a $31.6 million
line of credit from the FHLB of Atlanta. Borrowings under the line are secured
by a floating lien on the Banks residential mortgage loans and its portfolio
of U.S. Government and Agency Securities. As of December 31, 2001, a $7
million long-term convertible advance was outstanding under this line. In
addition the Bank has a secured line of credit in the amount of
$
5.0 million
from another commercial bank on which it has not drawn. Furthermore, on
September 7, 2000, the Company issued $5,155,000 of its 10.6% Junior
Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures to Glen Burnie Statutory Trust I, a
Connecticut statutory trust wholly owned by the Company. The Trust, in turn,
issued $5,000,000 of its 10.6% capital securities to institutional investors.
The debentures are scheduled to mature on September 7, 2030, unless called by
the Company not earlier than September 7, 2010. As of December 31, 2001, the
full $5,155,000 was outstanding.
Federal banking regulations require the Company and the Bank to maintain
specified levels of capital. At December 31, 2001, the Company was in
compliance with these requirements with a leverage ratio of 8.79%, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 12.67% and total risk-based capital ratio of
13.92%. At December 31, 2001, the Bank met the criteria for designation as a
well capitalized depository institution under FDIC regulations.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented herein
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative
purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial
companies, nearly all of the Companys assets and liabilities are monetary in
mature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the Companys
performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates
do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the
prices of goods and services.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and supplementary data required by this Item 8
are included in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and set forth
in the pages indicated in Item 14(a) of this Annual Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
-26-
2001
2000
Quarter Ended
High
Low
Dividends
High
Low
Dividends
$
10.50
$
8.25
$
0.10
$
12.83
$
8.33
$
0.083
14.00
10.00
0.10
10.67
8.83
0.10
17.20
12.25
0.10
11.25
10.00
0.10
15.00
13.15
0.15
10.17
8.00
0.166
Year Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
(Dollars In Thousand Except Per Share Data)
$
10,674
$
10,801
$
9,925
$
9,794
$
10,567
(150
)
300
(500
)
270
1,821
3,658
2,828
3,122
1,728
10,332
10,746
9,822
11,776
11,593
1,725
2,275
1,455
833
747
$
1.04
$
1.38
$
0.88
$
0.46
$
0.41
1.04
1.38
0.88
0.46
0.41
0.45
0.449
0.28
0.28
0.167
1,656,904
1,652,001
1,636,275
1,804,472
1,826,214
1,656,904
1,652,001
1,636,275
1,804,834
1,826,214
$
263,362
$
239,211
$
213,439
$
217,571
$
231,900
164,569
162,373
151,107
125,501
111,545
229,307
205,968
194,090
199,611
207,110
7,275
7,297
5,155
5,155
17,862
17,181
15,102
14,169
18,965
0.69
%
1.02
%
0.66
%
0.38
%
0.32
%
9.77
12.94
9.97
4.54
3.95
4.80
5.27
4.96
4.94
5.09
43.27
32.61
43.48
75.75
50.85
9.08
%
8.59
%
6.67
%
8.40
%
8.01
%
8.79
9.30
6.87
5.96
7.60
13.92
13.99
10.80
10.50
16.00
1.75
%
2.04
%
1.89
%
2.21
%
3.55
%
0.39
%
0.24
%
0.68
%
1.36
%
2.99
%
445.30
%
837.87
%
276.97
%
162.99
%
118.73
%
0.18
%
(0.28
)%
0.15
%
0.67
%
1.00
%
*
Not Meaningful
(1)
Presented on a tax-equivalent basis
(1)
Tax equivalent basis.
(2)
Non-accrual loans included in average balances.
1
Tax equivalent basis. The incremental tax rate applied was 34.38% for 2001 and 34.60% for 2000.
2
Non-accrual loans included in average balance.
Over 3 To
Over 1
Over 5
0-3 Months
12 Months
Through 5 Years
Years
Total
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
$
$
$
$
10,888
7,333
7,333
2,322
14,793
55,702
72,817
9,959
2,349
84,821
70,379
167,508
3,887
929
$
17,292
$
4,671
$
99,614
$
126,081
$
263,362
$
$
$
$
$
55,685
22,395
22,395
20,626
20,626
42,484
442,484
1,925
4,246
11,089
2,196
19,456
21,690
26,781
17,652
2,537
68,660
10,944
5,155
17,862
$
109,120
$
31,027
$
28,741
$
4,733
$
263,362
$
(91,829
)
$
(26,356
)
$
(70,873
)
$
121,348
(91,829
)
(118,185
)
(47,312
)
74,036
(34.9
%)
(44.9
%)
18.0
%
28.1
%
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information with respect to the identity and business experience of
the directors of the Company and their remuneration set forth in the section
captioned Proposal I Election of Directors in the Companys definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and issued in
conjunction with the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy
Statement) is incorporated herein by reference. The information with respect
to the identity and business experience of executive officers of the Company is
set forth in Part I of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the sections captioned Director Compensation and Executive Compensation
in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the sections captioned Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof
and Securities Ownership of Management in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the section captioned Transactions with Management in the Proxy Statement.
-27-
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are omitted because of
the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required
information is included in the consolidated financial statements and related
notes thereto.
None.
-28-
(a)
1. Financial Statements
.
Page
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-8
(a)
2. Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)
3. Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit No.
3.1
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants Form 8-A filed December 27, 1999, File
No. 0-24047)
3.2
By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1998,
File No. 0-24047)
3.3
Articles Supplementary, dated November 16, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed December 8, 1999, File No. 0-24047)
4.1
Rights Agreement, dated as of February 13, 1998, between Glen Burnie
Bancorp and The Bank of Glen Burnie, as Rights Agent, as amended and
restated as of December 27, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants Form 8-A filed December 27, 1999,
File No. 0-24047)
10.1
Glen Burnie Bancorp Director Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No.33-62280)
10.2
The Bank of Glen Burnie Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-46943)
10.3
Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Plan
10.4
The Bank of Glen Burnie Executive and Director Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1999, File No.
0-24047)
21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23
Consent of Trice Geary & Myers LLC
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
-29-
-30-
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
March 21, 2002
By:
-s- F. William Kuethe, Jr.
F. William Kuethe, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Signature
Title
Date
-s- William N. Scherer, Sr.
William N. Scherer, Sr.
Director
March 21, 2002
-s- Karen B. Thorwarth
Karen B. Thorwarth
Director
March 21, 2002
-s- Mary Lou Wilcox
Mary Lou Wilcox
Director
March 21, 2002
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Glen Burnie
Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Glen
Burnie Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
TRICE GEARY & MYERS LLC
F-1
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Glen Burnie, Maryland
Salisbury, Maryland
February 4, 2002
(except for Note 22, as to
which the date is March 14, 2002)
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
10,888,085
$
9,559,329
$
8,317,450
1,879,444
50,947
10,245
5,453,299
5,898,863
555,627
18,220,828
15,509,139
8,883,322
100,000
100,000
55,547,998
21,308,961
14,664,953
16,516,923
31,285,937
28,657,242
652,300
652,300
652,300
155,000
155,000
249,900
249,900
254,025
164,569,252
162,373,731
151,106,560
3,886,631
4,268,403
4,253,324
1,527,018
1,681,219
1,279,067
427,367
126,933
49,137
420,162
484,148
558,827
1,088,347
1,015,509
3,080,699
$
263,361,726
$
239,211,180
$
213,439,456
$
55,685,108
$
52,962,491
$
45,144,293
173,621,610
153,005,846
148,945,702
229,306,718
205,968,337
194,089,995
882,408
487,978
2,464,936
7,274,791
7,296,523
195,333
213,345
136,666
155,174
195,166
152,555
171,518
166,986
2,359,199
2,547,098
1,492,855
240,345,141
216,875,433
198,337,007
5,155,000
5,155,000
1,663,560
1,110,049
1,093,496
10,390,511
10,373,549
10,149,247
5,970,537
5,544,305
4,013,171
(163,023
)
152,844
(153,465
)
17,861,585
17,180,747
15,102,449
$
263,361,726
$
239,211,180
$
213,439,456
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
13,173,325
$
13,464,699
$
11,816,570
94,336
129,283
279,412
2,347,049
2,608,332
3,254,811
738,330
159,053
310,484
80,897
286,176
200,978
115,613
257,304
59,473
81,971
17,207,004
16,702,715
15,548,377
5,527,610
5,562,428
5,503,628
17,885
66,513
119,546
436,817
105,690
550,962
166,986
6,533,274
5,901,617
5,623,174
10,673,730
10,801,098
9,925,203
(150,000
)
300,000
10,823,730
10,801,098
9,625,203
860,681
859,734
891,913
687,454
734,255
687,939
273,003
(26,237
)
(63,968
)
490,000
1,311,997
1,600,126
1,821,138
3,657,878
2,827,881
4,083,115
4,085,541
3,925,075
1,769,209
2,131,481
1,596,044
577,440
615,201
573,052
889,924
871,655
876,774
3,012,405
3,042,171
2,850,745
10,332,093
10,746,049
9,821,690
2,312,775
3,712,927
2,631,394
587,539
1,438,061
1,186,044
$
1,725,236
$
2,274,866
$
1,445,350
$
1.04
$
1.38
$
0.88
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
1,725,236
$
2,274,866
$
1,445,350
(157,081
)
290,199
(472,279
)
(158,786
)
16,110
36,456
(315,867
)
306,309
(435,823
)
$
1,409,369
$
2,581,175
$
1,009,527
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999
Accumulated
Other
Total
Common Stock
Retained
Comprehensive
Stockholders'
Shares
Par Value
Surplus
Earnings
Income (Loss)
Equity
894,938
$
894,938
$
9,788,889
$
3,202,488
$
282,358
$
14,168,673
1,445,350
1,445,350
2,015
2,015
39,351
41,366
9,470
9,470
219,730
229,200
(8
)
(8
)
(130
)
(138
)
(452,418
)
(452,418
)
4,832
4,832
101,317
106,149
182,249
182,249
(182,249
)
(14,201
)
(14,201
)
14,291
14,291
(435,823
)
(435,823
)
1,093,496
1,093,496
10,149,247
4,013,171
(153,465
)
15,102,449
2,274,866
2,274,866
2,659
2,659
47,330
49,989
(743,732
)
(743,732
)
13,894
13,894
187,861
201,755
(10,889
)
(10,889
)
306,309
306,309
1,110,049
1,110,049
10,373,549
5,544,305
152,844
17,180,747
1,725,236
1,725,236
(10,000
)
(10,000
)
(138,750
)
(148,750
)
(747,807
)
(747,807
)
12,314
12,314
155,712
168,026
551,197
551,197
(551,197
)
(315,867
)
(315,867
)
1,663,560
$
1,663,560
$
10,390,511
$
5,970,537
$
(163,023
)
$
17,861,585
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
1,725,236
$
2,274,866
$
1,445,350
805,988
744,678
831,034
(10,889
)
90
(150,000
)
300,000
63,986
27,679
(101,691
)
(73,725
)
921,194
(259,135
)
(255,803
)
43,273
154,201
(402,152
)
122,593
(59,006
)
2,020,004
(741,174
)
(35,460
)
209,597
(8,042
)
(167,514
)
834,018
(674,080
)
1,976,605
5,368,273
2,240,238
3,303,672
1,521,930
2,490,926
10,961,629
500,000
7,754,438
2,271,148
1,621,643
5,018,593
5,237,023
500,000
1,991,087
7,067,274
4,540,643
14,985,136
(2,990,625
)
(1,652,173
)
(6,357,408
)
(25,158,011
)
(23,434,008
)
(12,836,928
)
(5,498,437
)
284,100
(100,000
)
(155,000
)
(2,045,521
)
(11,267,171
)
(25,729,005
)
537,000
402,693
(59,523
)
42,920
(432,658
)
(599,373
)
(439,450
)
(22,229,452
)
(20,380,054
)
(5,113,930
)
10,990,615
7,608,893
(4,524,635
)
12,347,766
4,269,449
(996,485
)
394,430
(1,976,958
)
1,321,032
7,000,000
(21,732
)
(3,477
)
(765,819
)
(667,053
)
(438,791
)
168,026
201,755
106,149
(148,750
)
(138
)
5,155,000
49,989
270,566
22,964,536
21,637,598
(4,262,302
)
2,711,689
6,625,817
(7,135,994
)
15,509,139
8,883,322
16,019,316
$
18,220,828
$
15,509,139
$
8,883,322
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Glen Burnie Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
6,568,734
$
5,692,020
$
5,631,216
693,000
205,000
(514,610
)
499,038
(710,042
)
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
F-8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(continued)
F-9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(continued)
F-10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(continued)
Note 2. Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks
Note 3. Investment Securities
F-11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3. Investment Securities
(continued)
F-12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3. Investment Securities
(continued)
F-13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3. Investment Securities
(continued)
Note 4. Loans
F-14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4. Loans
(continued)
F-15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5. Premises and Equipment
Note 6. Short-term borrowings
F-16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 6. Short-term borrowings
(continued)
Note 7. Long-term Borrowings
F-17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8. Deposits
F-18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9. Income Taxes
F-19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9. Income Taxes
(continued)
Note 10. Pension and Profit Sharing Plans
F-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10. Pension and Profit Sharing Plans
(continued)
F-21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10. Pension and Profit Sharing Plans
(continued)
Note 11. Post-Retirement Health Care Benefits
Note 11. Post-Retirement Health Care Benefits
(continued)
F-22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 12. Other Benefit Plans
In March 1998, the Bank established and funded a grantor trust for
$1,500,000 as part of a change in control severance plan covering
substantially all employees. Participants in the plan are entitled to
cash severance benefits upon termination of employment, for any reason
other than just cause, should a change in control of the Company occur.
Note 13. Other Operating Expenses
F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14. Litigation Charges
Note 15. Repurchase and Retirement of Company Common Stock
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
F-24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
(continued)
Note 17. Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interest in Junior Subordinated Debentures
F-25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 18. Stockholders Equity
F-26
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 18. Stockholders Equity
(continued)
F-27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 18. Stockholders Equity
(continued)
F-28
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 18. Stockholders Equity
(continued)
F-29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 18. Stockholders Equity
(continued)
Note 19. Earnings Per Common Share
F-30
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 20. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
F-31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 20. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
(continued)
Note 21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
F-32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 22. Subsequent Event
Note 23. Parent Company Financial Information
The Bank of Glen Burnie (the Bank) provides financial services to
individuals and corporate customers located in Anne Arundel County and
surrounding areas of Central Maryland, and is subject to competition from
other financial institutions. The Bank is also subject to the
regulations of certain Federal and State of Maryland (the State)
agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory
authorities. The accounting policies of the Bank conform to generally
accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the
banking industry.
Significant accounting policies not disclosed elsewhere in the
consolidated financial statements are as follows:
Principles of Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Glen Burnie
Bancorp (the Company) and its subsidiaries, The Bank of Glen Burnie and
GBB Properties, Inc., a company engaged in the acquisition and
disposition of other real estate. Intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. The Parent Only financial statements (see Note 23)
of the Company account for the subsidiaries using the equity method of
accounting.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Securities Held to Maturity:
Bonds, notes, and debentures for which the Bank has the positive intent
and ability to hold to maturity are reported at cost, adjusted for
premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income using the
effective interest rate method over the period to maturity. Securities
transferred into held to maturity from the available for sale portfolio
are recorded at fair value at time of transfer with unrealized gains or
losses reflected in equity and amortized over the remaining life of the
security.
Securities Available for Sale:
Marketable debt securities not classified as held to maturity are
classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale may be
sold in response to changes in interest rates, loan demand, changes in
prepayment risk, and other factors. Changes in unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on securities available for sale are reported in other
comprehensive income. Realized gains (losses) on securities available
for sale are included in other income (expense) and, when applicable, are
reported as a reclassification adjustment, net of tax, in other
comprehensive income. The gains and losses on securities sold are
determined by the specific identification method. Premiums and discounts
are recognized in interest income using the effective interest rate
method over the period to maturity. Additionally, declines in the fair
value of individual investment securities below their cost that are other
than temporary are reflected as realized losses in the consolidated
statements of income.
Other Securities:
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock is an equity interest in the FHLB,
which does not have a readily determinable fair value for purposes of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No 115,
Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
, because its
ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. FHLB stock can be sold
back only at its par value of $100 per share and only to the FHLB or
another member institution.
Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses:
Loans are generally carried at the amount of unpaid principal, adjusted
for deferred loan fees, which are amortized over the term of the loan
using the effective interest rate method. Interest on loans is accrued
based on the principal amounts outstanding. It is the Banks policy to
discontinue the accrual of interest when a loan is specifically
determined to be impaired or when principal or interest is delinquent for
90 days or more. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status all interest
previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period
interest income. Interest income generally is not recognized on specific
impaired loans unless the likelihood of further loss is remote. Cash
collections on such loans are applied as reductions of the loan principal
balance and no interest income is recognized on those loans until the
principal balance has been collected. Interest income on other
nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest payments
received. The carrying value of impaired loans is based on the present
value of the loans expected future cash flows or, alternatively, the
observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral.
The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for
credit losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the
allowance for credit losses when management believes that the
collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance, based on
evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss
experience, is an amount that management believes will be adequate to
absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible.
The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the
nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality,
review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions and
trends that may affect the borrowers ability to pay.
While management believes it has established the allowance for credit
losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
has taken into account the views of its regulators and the current
economic environment, there can be no assurance that in the future the
Banks regulators or its economic environment will not require further
increases in the allowance.
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
The reserve for unfunded commitments is established through a provision
for unfunded commitments charged to other expenses. The reserve is
calculated by utilizing the same methodology and factors as the allowance
for credit losses. The reserve, based on evaluations of the
collectibiltiy of loans and prior loan loss experience, is an amount that
management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on
unfunded commitments (off-balance sheet financial instruments) that may
become uncollectible in the future.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO):
OREO comprises properties acquired in partial or total satisfaction of
problem loans. The properties are recorded at the lower of cost or fair
value (appraised value) at the date acquired. Losses arising at the time
of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for
credit losses. Subsequent write-downs that may be required and expenses
of operation are included in other income or expenses. Gains and losses
realized from the sale of OREO are included in other income or expenses.
There were no loans converted to OREO in 2001 or 2000. Loans converted
to OREO through foreclosure proceedings totaled $59,523 for the year
ended December 31, 1999. No sales of OREO were financed by the Bank for
2001, 2000, or 1999. Sales of OREO financed by GBB Properties, Inc.
totaled $145,000 for 2000.
Bank Premises and Equipment:
Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. The provision for depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the terms of
the leases or their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for
improvements that extend the life of an asset are capitalized and
depreciated over the assets remaining useful life. Gains or losses
realized on the disposition of premises and equipment are reflected in
the consolidated statements of income. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance are charged to other expenses as incurred. Computer software
is recorded at cost and amortized over three to five years.
Intangible Assets:
A core deposit intangible asset of $544,652, relating to a branch
acquisition, is being amortized on the straight-line method over 10
years. Accumulated amortization was
$340,407
, $285,942, and $231,477 at
December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Amortization expense
totaled
$54,465
for each of the years ended December 2001, 2000, and
1999.
Long-Lived Assets:
The carrying value of long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles, including goodwill, is reviewed by the Bank for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable, as prescribed in SFAS No. 121,
Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets
to be Disposed Of
, and later superceded by SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(See Note 21). As of
December 31, 2001 and 1999, no long-lived assets existed in which
management considered impaired, however, in 2000 certain long-lived
assets were deemed to be impaired (See Note 5).
Income Taxes:
The provision for Federal and state income taxes is based upon the
results of operations, adjusted for tax-exempt income. Deferred income
taxes are provided by applying enacted statutory tax rates to temporary
differences between financial and taxable bases.
Temporary differences which give rise to deferred tax benefits relate
principally to the other real estate owned, deferred compensation and
pension benefits, tax credit carryovers, and unfunded commitments.
Temporary differences which give rise to deferred tax liabilities relate
principally to accumulated depreciation, allowance for credit losses,
accretion of discount on investment securities, and prepaid pension
expense.
Credit Risk:
The Bank has deposits in other financial institutions in excess of
amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
At December 31, 2001, the Bank had deposits and Federal funds sold with
three separate financial institutions of approximately $736,000,
$813,000, and $11,047,000.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The Bank has included cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits
in other financial institutions, and Federal funds sold as cash and cash
equivalents for the purpose of reporting cash flows.
Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per common share are determined by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share are calculated including the average dilutive
common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common
equivalent shares consist of stock options, calculated using the treasury
stock method.
Financial Statement Presentation:
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
The Federal Reserve requires the Bank to maintain noninterest-bearing
cash reserves against certain categories of average deposit liabilities.
Such reserves averaged approximately
$2,923,000
, $3,039,000, and
$2,477,000 during the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively.
Investment securities are summarized as follows:
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
December 31, 2001
Amortized Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
$
498,684
$
25,066
$
$
523,750
7,504,660
13,859
9,688
7,508,831
19,976,500
137,505
313,434
19,800,571
4,819,930
126,842
9,958
4,936,814
23,013,820
33,127
268,915
22,778,032
$
55,813,594
$
336,399
$
601,995
$
55,547,998
$
749,498
$
21,830
$
$
771,328
6,881,993
161,650
14,375
7,029,268
682,560
19,197
701,757
8,202,872
183,604
7,378
8,379,098
$
16,516,923
$
386,281
$
21,753
$
16,881,451
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
December 21, 2000
cost
Gains
Losses
Value
$
497,871
$
9,638
$
$
507,509
6,975,277
45,107
38,008
6,982,376
8,038,349
254,201
8,292,550
2,821,428
1,481
2,819,947
2,727,023
20,444
2,706,579
$
21,059,948
$
308,946
$
59,933
$
21,308,961
$
1,248,529
$
14,446
$
620
$
1,262,355
17,834,666
83,636
311,617
17,606,685
682,431
27,437
709,868
11,520,311
51,804
131,902
11,440,213
$
31,285,937
$
177,323
$
444,139
$
31,019,121
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
December 31, 1999
cost
G&S
Losses
Value
$
991,895
$
$
9,378
$
982,517
5,491,665
209,145
5,282,520
8,431,417
24,870
56,371
8,399,916
$
14,914,977
$
24,870
$
274,894
$
14,664,953
$
1,747,488
$
4,241
$
5,081
$
1,746,648
16,851,527
1,139,994
15,711,533
10,058,227
474,657
9,583,570
$
28,657,242
$
4,241
$
1,619,732
$
27,041,751
Contractual maturities of investment securities at December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because debtors may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Mortgage-backed securities have no stated maturity and primarily reflect
investments in various Pass-through and Participation Certificates issued
by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Government National
Mortgage Association. Repayment of mortgage-backed securities is
affected by the contractual repayment terms of the underlying mortgages
collateralizing these obligations and the current level of interest
rates.
Available for Sale
Held to Maturity
Amortized
Fair
Amortized
Fair
December 21, 2000
cost
Value
cost
Value
$
$
$
1,669,481
$
1,715,190
7,277,130
7,274,011
1,000,000
1,066,579
4,195,187
4,126,922
499,625
534,375
21,327,457
21,369,033
5,144,945
5,186,209
23,013,820
22,778,032
8,202,872
8,379,098
$
55,813,594
$
55,547,998
$
16,516,923
$
16,881,451
Available for Sale
Held to Maturity
Amortized
Fair
Amortized
Fair
December 21, 2000
cost
Value
cost
Value
$
$
$
499,841
$
499,478
6,973,148
6,976,182
3,634,136
3,684,832
679,801
696,287
7,490,924
7,449,653
1,679,976
10,929,913
8,140,725
7,944,945
2,727,023
2,706,579
11,520,311
11,440,213
$
21,059,948
$
21,308,961
$
31,285,937
$
31,019,121
Available for Sale
Held to Maturity
Amortized
Fair
Amortized
Fair
December 21, 2000
cost
Value
cost
Value
$
$
$
500,047
$
500,134
5,483,560
5,310,974
3,653,770
3,577,422
1,000,000
954,063
6,990,185
6,635,625
7,455,013
6,745,000
8,431,417
8,399,916
10,058,227
9,583,570
$
14,914,977
$
14,664,953
$
28,657,242
$
27,041,751
Proceeds from sales of securities prior to maturity were
$7,067,274
,
$4,540,643, and $14,985,138 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000,
and 1999, respectively. Gains of
$276,392
and losses of $
3,389
were
realized on those sales for 2001. Losses of $26,237 were realized on
those sales for 2000. Gains of $59,647 and losses of $123,614 were
realized on those sales for 1999. Realized gains and losses were
calculated based on the amortized cost of the securities at the date of
trade. Income tax benefit (expense) relating to net gains/losses on
sales of investment securities was (
$105,434)
, $10,133, and $24,704, for
the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Securities with amortized costs of approximately
$1,248,000,
$1,247,000,
and $1,742,000 were pledged as collateral for short-term borrowings and
financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999, respectively.
The Bank has no derivative financial instruments required to be disclosed
under SFAS No. 119,
Disclosure about Derivative Financial Instruments and
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
Major categories of loans are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
44,293,130
$
36,187,294
$
34,098,848
36,920,258
40,168,603
42,342,103
2,355,395
5,256,921
6,094,894
70,675
341,277
5,082,790
3,655,180
3,359,785
79,642,436
81,124,897
68,518,095
168,294,009
166,463,570
154,755,002
(786,302
)
(705,024
)
(726,811
)
167,507,707
165,758,546
154,028,191
(2,938,455
)
(3,384,815
)
(2,921,631
)
$
164,569,252
$
162,373,731
$
151,106,560
The Bank has an automotive indirect lending program where vehicle
collateralized loans made by dealers to consumers are acquired by the
Bank. The Banks installment loan portfolio included approximately
$59,308,000
, $61,725,000, and $50,967,000 of such loans at December 31,
2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
The Bank makes loans to customers located primarily in Anne Arundel
County and surrounding areas of Central Maryland. Although the loan
portfolio is diversified, its performance will be influenced by the
economy of the region.
Executive officers, directors, and their affiliated interests enter into
loan transactions with the Bank in the ordinary course of business.
These loans are made on the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with
unrelated borrowers. They do not involve more than normal risk of
collectibility or present other unfavorable terms. At December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999, the amounts of such loans outstanding were
$1,194,860
,
$1,319,700, and $1,417,716, respectively. During 2001, loan additions
and repayments were $81,598 and $206,438, respectively.
The allowance for credit losses is as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
3,384,815
$
2,921,631
$
2,841,060
(150,000
)
300,000
390,792
1,223,618
454,277
(687,152
)
(760,434
)
(673,706
)
$
2,938,455
$
3,384,815
$
2,921,631
Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued amounted to
$601,120
, $370,053, and $1,011,826 at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively. Interest that would have been accrued under the terms of
these loans totaled
$14,877
, $48,484, and $168,644 for the years ended
December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Information regarding loans classified by the Bank as impaired is
summarized as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
443,874
$
207,579
$
1,043,944
117,271
77,633
217,907
211,294
63,105
1,842,757
Following is a summary of cash receipts on impaired loans and how they were applied:
$
71,057
$
6,389
$
83,828
10,878
581
$
81,935
$
6,970
$
83,828
According to management, there were no troubled debt restructurings in
2001. All previous restructurings appear to be performing under the
terms of the modified agreements.
At December 31, 2000, the total recorded investment in troubled debt
restructurings amounted to $369,594. The average recorded investment in
troubled debt restructurings amounted to $383,642 for the year ended
December 31, 2000. The allowance for credit losses relating to troubled
debt restructurings was $66,479 at December 31, 2000. Interest income on
troubled debt restructurings of $93,653 was recognized for cash payments
received in 2000.
At December 31, 1999, the total recorded investment in troubled debt
restructurings amounted to $243,137. The average recorded investment in
troubled debt restructurings amounted to $252,477 for the year ended
December 31, 1999. The allowance for credit losses relating to troubled
debt restructurings was $73,635 at December 31, 1999. Interest income on
troubled debt restructurings of $17,660 was recognized for cash payments
received in 1999.
The Bank has no commitments to loan additional funds to the borrowers of
restructured, impaired, or non-accrual loans.
A summary of premises and equipment is as follows:
Useful
lives
2001
2000
1999
5-50 years
$
684,977
$
684,977
$
591,377
5-30 years
4,157,641
4,112,520
4,004,737
4,768,901
4,479,403
4,385,699
17,954
246,461
10,333
9,629,473
9,523,361
8,992,146
(5,742,842
)
(5,254,958
)
(4,738,822
)
$
3,886,631
$
4,268,403
$
4,253,324
2001
2000
1999
$
882,408
$
487,978
$
464,936
2,000,000
$
882,408
$
487,978
$
2,464,936
Depreciation expense was
$573,674
, $551,784, and $575,100 for the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Amortization of software and intangible assets totaled
$192,670
,
$197,286, and $187,046 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and
1999, respectively.
The Bank leases its South Crain Highway and Severna Park branches.
Minimum lease obligations under the South Crain Highway branch are
$71,800 per year through September 2004, adjusted annually by the CPI.
Minimum lease obligations under the Severna Park branch are $36,560 per
year through September 2004, adjusted annually by the CPI. The Bank is
also required to pay all maintenance costs under all these leasing
arrangements. Rent expense totaled
$110,612
, $122,060, and $85,980 for
the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
In December 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company decided to close
the Ferndale Shopping Center branch. At December 31, 2000, management
determined that leasehold improvements made to the Ferndale branch, with
a book value of $184,535, were impaired as prescribed by SFAS No. 144 and
had no net realizable value, and recorded an asset impairment loss from
continuing operations for this amount. The Bank also accrued
approximately $96,000 relating to the estimated cost of closing the
Ferndale branch, which were included in other operating expenses for 2000
(see Note 13).
Short-term borrowings are as follows:
2001
1999
2001
$
882,408
$
487,978
$
464,936
2,000,000
$
882,408
$
487,978
$
2,464,936
The Bank owned 6,523 shares of common stock of the FHLB at December 31,
2001. The Bank is required to maintain an investment of .3% of total
assets, adjusted annually. This investment was a condition for obtaining
a variable rate credit facility with the FHLB. The credit available
under this facility is determined at 12% of the Banks total assets or
approximately $31,600,000 at December 31, 2001. There was $7,000,000 in
long-term advances under this credit arrangement at December 31, 2001
(see Note 7). Also, at December 31, 1999, the Bank had short-term
advances of $2,000,000 under these arrangements, bearing interest at
4.55%, and maturing within the next year. This credit facility is
secured by a floating lien on the Banks residential mortgage loan
portfolio and by investment securities with amortized cost of
approximately
$250,000
, $250,000, and $750,000 at December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999, respectively. Average short-term borrowings under this
facility were approximately $640,000 and $1,506,000 during 2000 and 1999,
respectively, with no short-term borrowings in 2001.
Notes payable to the U.S. Treasury are Federal treasury tax and loan
deposits accepted by the Bank from its customers to be remitted on demand
to the Federal Reserve Bank. The Bank pays interest on these balances at
a slight discount to the Federal funds rate. The note payable is secured
by investment securities with an amortized cost of approximately
$998,000
, $997,000, and $995,000 at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively.
The Bank also has available $5,000,000 in a short-term credit facility,
secured by Federal funds sold, from another bank for short term liquidity
needs, if necessary. There were no borrowings outstanding under this
credit arrangement at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999.
Long-term borrowings are as follows:
2001
2000
$
7,000,000
$
7,000,000
274,791
296,523
$
7,274,791
$
7,296,523
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta convertible advance has a final
maturity of September 2010 and an interest rate of 5.84%, payable
quarterly, which is fixed through September 2002. At that time, the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta has the option of converting the rate
to a three month LIBOR; however, if converted, the borrowing can be
repaid without penalty. The proceeds of the convertible advance were
used to purchase higher yielding investment securities.
At December 31, 2001, the scheduled maturities of long-term borrowings are
approximately as follows:
2001
$
23,300
25,000
26,800
28,700
30,800
7,140,191
$
7,274,791
Major classifications of interest-bearing deposits are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
22,395,703
$
19,644,885
$
18,562,778
20,626,249
16,766,390
17,628,665
42,344,960
40,687,639
41,116,776
17,635,466
11,995,756
6,345,179
70,619,232
63,911,176
65,292,304
$
173,621,610
$
153,005,846
$
148,945,702
Interest expense on deposits is as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
136,590
$
217,558
$
230,708
356,798
449,850
527,466
613,088
961,028
938,117
750,434
557,693
435,885
3,670,700
3,376,299
3,371,452
$
5,527,610
$
5,562,428
$
5,503,628
At December 31, 2001, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are
approximately as follows:
2001
$
53,258,000
17,779,000
5,665,000
2,490,000
4,329,000
4,734,000
$
88,255,000
Deposit balances of executive officers and directors and their affiliated
interests totaled approximately
$526,000
, $734,000, and $369,000 at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively.
The Bank had no brokered deposits at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999.
The components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31,
2001, 2000, and 1999 are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
594,160
$
1,271,219
$
264,850
95,070
240,567
689,230
1,511,786
264,850
(70,871
)
51,660
793,015
(30,820
)
(125,385
)
128,179
(101,691
)
(73,725
)
921,194
$
587,539
$
1,438,061
$
1,186,044
A reconciliation of income tax expense computed at the statutory rate of
34% to the actual income tax expense for the years ended December 31,
2001, 2000, and 1999 is as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
2,312,775
$
3,712,927
$
2,631,394
$
786,344
$
1,262,395
$
894,674
238,636
196,800
(248,386
)
(49,261
)
42,405
76,021
84,598
(87,421
)
7,176
(2,309
)
9,972
$
587,539
$
1,438,061
$
1,186,044
Sources of deferred income taxes and the tax effects of each for the years
ended December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999 are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
(52,012
)
$
(46,174
)
$
(11,998
)
8,109
7,066
2,858
52,185
(18,725
)
139,705
(89,370
)
(646,776
)
542,275
29,372
32,430
(22,912
)
(9,462
)
4,773
60,239
610,974
126,090
85,061
(57,930
)
$
(101,691
)
$
(73,725
)
$
921,194
The components of the net deferred income tax benefits as of December 31,
2001, 2000, and 1999 are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
$
2,986
$
415,425
326,055
276,334
32,375
9,462
29,372
60,239
671,213
102,573
96,560
57,930
608,303
398,742
1,073,479
94,144
146,156
192,330
49,199
15,739
37,593
29,483
22,417
597,056
96,170
180,936
271,809
827,542
$
427,367
$
126,933
$
245,937
Management has determined that no valuation allowance is required as it
is more likely than not that the net deferred income tax benefits will be
fully realizable in future years.
Through 1998, the Bank had a defined benefit pension plan covering
substantially all of its employees. Benefits were based on the
employees average rate of earnings for the five consecutive years before
retirement. The Banks funding policy was to contribute annually an
amount between the minimum and maximum actuarially determined
contribution, using the frozen entry age actuarial cost method. Assets
of the plan were held in a trust fund principally comprised of growth and
income mutual funds managed by another bank.
The Bank officially terminated the plan on December 27, 1999 and received
IRS approval for plan termination in February 2000. The Bank settled all
accrued benefits under the plan in October 2000. The Bank established a
money purchase pension plan as a replacement plan. Upon termination of
the pension plan, all participants became 100% vested. All accrued
benefits under the terminated and settled pension plan were provided to
participants through the purchase of annuities, or, in the case of
actively employed participants, at their option, in the form of a lump
sum rollover to the new defined contribution money purchase pension plan.
As a result of the termination of the defined benefit plan in 1999, the
Bank has recognized a curtailment gain of $1,311,997, included in other
income. The Bank also accrued a 25% safe harbor contribution of
$328,000, included in employee benefit expense, and excise taxes of
$196,800, payable on curtailment gains recognized, included in Federal
and state income tax expense.
As a result of the settlement of the defined benefit plan in October
2000, the Bank recognized a settlement gain of $1,600,126, included in
other income. The Bank also accrued a 25% safe harbor contribution of
$397,728, included in employee benefit expense, and excise taxes of
$238,636, payable on settlement gains recognized, included in Federal and
state income tax expense.
The following table sets forth the financial status of the pension plan
at December 31, 2000 and 1999:
2000
1999
$
4,791,364
$
4,423,566
261,367
(4710,262
)
(144,739
)
(7,223
)
(1,435,130
)
1,607,050
(81,102
)
86,473
$
$
4,791,364
$
$
4,791,364
$
7,045,921
$
5,699,073
(7,622,385
)
(144,739
)
576,464
1,491,587
$
$
7,045,921
$
$
7,045,921
(4,791,364
)
2,254,557
(684,244
)
(24,336
)
$
$
1,545,977
$
$
254,144
(576,464
)
(1,491,587
)
874,288
939,619
$
297,824
$
(297,824
)
Assumptions used in the accounting for net pension expense were:
2000
1999
N/A
5.5
%
N/A
6.5
%
N/A
8.5
%
During 1999, the Bank established a money purchase pension plan. The
plan provides for annual employer contributions, based on employee
compensation and covers substantially all employees. Contributions under
this plan, made from the safe harbour accrual, were
$175,794
and $156,988
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Bank
is also making additional contributions under this plan to certain
employees whose retirement funds were negatively affected by the
termination of the defined benefit pension plan. These additional
contributions, included in employee benefit expense, were
$149,044
for
the year ended December 31, 2001.
The Bank also has a defined contribution retirement plan qualifying under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code that is funded through a
profit sharing agreement and voluntary employee contributions. The plan
provides for discretionary employer matching contributions to be
determined annually by the Board of Directors. The plan covers
substantially all employees. The Banks contributions to the plan
included in employee benefit expense were
$242,997
, $230,971, and
$187,704 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively.
The Bank provides health care benefits to employees who retire at age 65
with five years of full time service immediately prior to retirement and
two years of participation in the medical benefits plan. In 2001, the
Bank amended the plan to include the current Board of Directors and their
spouses and the spouses of current retirees. The plan is funded only by
the Banks monthly payments of insurance premiums due. The following
table sets forth the financial status of the plan at December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999:
2001
2000
1999
$
503,823
$
299,422
$
308,960
79,954
1,023,038
659,531
786,293
1,606,815
958,953
1,095,253
31,712
250,074
11,504
(434,186
)
(467,585
)
(500,984
)
(128,666
)
102,822
109,746
$
1,075,675
$
844,264
$
715,519
$
135,368
$
73,360
$
71,739
100,651
60,006
67,844
33,399
33,399
33,399
(6,879
)
4,304
(6,924
)
(6,924
)
$
273,722
$
152,962
$
166,058
Assumptions used in the accounting for net post-retirement benefit
expense were:
2001
2000
1999
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
6.5
%
6.5
%
6.5
%
If the assumed health care cost trend rate were increased to
6%
for 2001,
2000, and 1999, the total of the service and interest cost components of
net periodic post-retirement health care benefit cost would increase by
$46,848
, $28,474, and $37,610 for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000, and 1999, respectively, and the accumulated post-retirement benefit
obligation would increase to
$320,570
, $181,436, and $203,668 as of
December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Subsequent to the repurchase of the Companys common stock under a
Redemption Agreement and entering into a standstill agreement (see Note
15), and effective as of December 31, 1998, all assets held by this trust
were returned to the Bank; however, the trust continues to exist on an
unfunded status. In August 2001, the Board of Directors approved certain
amendments and revisions to the plan to reflect changes at the Bank since
inception of the plan.
Other operating expenses include the following:
2001
2000
1999
$
605,952
$
642,609
$
714,929
260,863
224,453
251,388
262,759
269,710
235,110
37,696
67,393
22,481
128,101
114,442
134,092
244,838
251,113
342,737
154,980
231,097
222,709
74,533
95,245
98,896
138,220
100,026
102,757
93,608
98,446
91,783
73,455
58,334
38,218
280,460
150,000
787,400
608,843
595,645
$
3,012,405
$
3,042,171
$
2,850,745
In 2001, the Company incurred losses of $70,000 relating to the
settlement of a legal claim involving alleged conversion of funds of a
certificate of deposit. These nonrecurring charges were included in
other expenses for 2001.
During 1998, the Company was pursued by another competing financial
institution (the institution) in a hostile take-over attempt. In
November 1998, the Company reached an agreement with the institution to
repurchase 213,168 shares of its common stock, or approximately 19.5% of
its then outstanding shares, for an aggregate purchase price of
$5,580,764. In conjunction with the redemption agreement, the Company
and the institution also entered into a standstill agreement through
November 2008. Under the standstill agreement, the Company will make
payments over five years totaling $675,510 beginning with a payment of
$150,000 in January 1999 and four subsequent annual payments of $131,378.
During 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company made payments totaling
$131,378
,
$131,378 and $281,378, respectively, relating to the standstill
agreement. These payments are included in other expenses.
Financial instruments:
The Bank is a party to financial instruments in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial
instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated financial statements.
Outstanding loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
250,000
$
450,000
$
740,000
5,456,022
79,000
739,800
$
5,706,022
$
529,000
$
1,479,800
$
3,775,941
$
3,417,102
$
3,215,502
7,272,045
7,615,035
9,981,462
862,555
908,600
824,978
$
11,910,541
$
11,940,737
$
14,021,942
$
1,257,361
$
1,237,878
$
1,384,969
Loan commitments and lines of credit are agreements to lend to customers
as long as there is no violation of any conditions of the contracts.
Loan commitments generally have interest rates fixed at current market
amounts, fixed expiration dates, and may require payment of a fee. Lines
of credit generally have variable interest rates. Many of the loan
commitments and lines of credit are expected to expire without being
drawn upon; accordingly, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral or
other security obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension
of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation. Collateral held
varies but may include deposits held in financial institutions, U.S.
Treasury securities, other marketable securities, accounts receivable,
inventory, property and equipment, personal residences, income-producing
commercial properties, and land under development. Personal guarantees
are also obtained to provide added security for certain commitments.
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those
guarantees are primarily issued to guarantee the installation of real
property improvements and similar transactions. The credit risk involved
in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in
extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank holds collateral and
obtains personal guarantees supporting those commitments for which
collateral or other securities is deemed necessary.
The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
customer is the contractual amount of the commitment. Loan commitments,
lines of credit, and letters of credit are made on the same terms,
including collateral, as outstanding loans. As of December 31, 2001, the
Bank has accrued $150,000 for unfunded commitments related to these
financial instruments with off balance sheet risk, which is included in
other liabilities.
On September 7, 2000, Glen Burnie Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut
business trust newly formed, funded, and wholly owned by the Company,
issued $5,155,000 of capital securities at 10.6% to institutional
investors. The proceeds were upstreamed to the Company as junior
subordinated debt under the same terms and conditions. The Company has,
through various contractual arrangements, fully and unconditionally
guaranteed all of Statutory Trust Is obligations with respect to the
capital securities. These capital securities qualify as Tier I capital
and are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Guaranteed
Preferred Beneficial Interests in Glen Burnie Bancorps Junior
Subordinated Debentures. The sole asset of the Statutory Trust I is
$5,155,000 of junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company.
These junior subordinated debentures carry an interest rate of 10.6%,
payable semi-annually, with a non call provision over the first 10 year
period, and a declining 10 year premium call thereafter. Both the
capital securities Statutory Trust I and the junior subordinated
debentures are scheduled to mature on September 7, 2030, unless called by
the Company not earlier than September 7, 2010.
Cost associated with the issuance of the trust preferred securities
totaling $150,000 were capitalized and are being amortized through 2030.
At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the unamortized balance totaled
$145,000
and $150,000, respectively, and was included in other assets.
Restrictions on dividends:
Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid
without prior approval of the Banks regulatory agencies. Regulatory
approval is required to pay dividends that exceed the Banks net profits
for the current year plus its retained net profits for the preceding two
years. Retained earnings from which dividends may not be paid without
prior approval were approximately
$2,469,000
, $2,694,000, and $2,276,000
at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, based on the earnings
restrictions and minimum capital ratio requirements noted below.
Change in par value of common stock:
In December 1999, the Company changed the par value of its common stock
from $10 par value to $1 par value. The $9 per share of par value has
been reclassified as surplus.
Stock repurchase program:
In December 2000, the Company instituted a Stock Repurchase Program.
Under the program, the
Company may spend up to $250,000 to repurchase its outstanding stock.
The repurchases may be made from time to time at a price not to exceed
$10.667 per share. During 2001, the Company repurchased 15,000 shares at
an average price of $9.917 (adjusted for stock splits and stock
dividends). As of December 2001, the Company has terminated this
program.
Employee stock purchase benefit plans:
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is described
below. The Bank applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No.
25 and related Interpretations in accounting for this plan. Net
compensation cost (benefit) of
$0
, ($10,889), and $90 have been
recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in 2001,
2000, and 1999, respectively. If compensation cost for the Companys
stock-based compensation plan had been determined based on the fair value
at the grant date for awards under this plan consistent with the methods
outlined in SFAS No. 123
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
, there
would be no material change in reported net income.
Employees who have completed one year of service are eligible to
participate in the employee stock purchase plan. The number of shares of
common stock granted under options will bear a uniform relationship to
compensation. The plan allows employees to buy stock under options
granted at the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the stock on the
date of grant or exercise. Options granted will expire no later than 27
months from the grant date or upon termination of employment. Activity
under this plan is as follows:
Grant
Shares
Price
8,689
$
11.806
(1,872
)
(6,817
)
$
11.806
7,371
$
10.978
(1,755
)
5,616
$
10.978
(5,616
)
$
10.978
At December 31, 2001, there were
41,562
shares of common stock reserved
for issuance under the plan.
During December 2001, the Board of Directors approved for additional
options to be granted under this plan at $12.11 per share for a period of
15 months, expiring in March 2003. As of December 31, 2001, no options
had been granted under this plan.
The Board of Directors may suspend or discontinue the plan at its
discretion.
Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan:
The Companys dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan allows all
participating stockholders the opportunity to receive additional shares
of common stock in lieu of cash dividends at 95% of the fair market value
on the dividend payment date.
During 2001, 2000, and 1999,
13,607,
20,841, and 8,698 shares of common
stock, respectively, were purchased under the plan. At December 31,
2001, there were
154,239
shares of common stock reserved for issuance
under the plan.
The Board of Directors may suspend or discontinue the plan at its discretion.
Stockholder purchase plan:
The Companys stockholder purchase plan allows participating stockholders
an option to purchase newly issued shares of common stock. The Board of
Directors shall determine the number of shares that may be purchased
pursuant to options. Options granted will expire no later than three
months from the grant date. Each option will entitle the stockholder to
purchase one share of common stock, and will be granted in proportion to
stockholder share holdings. At the discretion of the Board of Directors,
stockholders may be given the opportunity to purchase unsubscribed shares.
Grant
Shares
Price
185,414
$
14.514
(6,025
)
(179,389
)
$
14.514
90,000
$
12.917
(6,700
)
(83,300
)
$
12.917
90,000
$
12.778
(4,322
)
(85,678
)
$
12.778
75,000
$
12.533
(2,307
)
(72,693
)
$
12.533
75,000
$
12.533
(1,682
)
(73,318
)
$
12.533
At December 31, 2001, there were
181,666
shares of common stock reserved
for issuance under the plan.
The Board of Directors may suspend or discontinue the plan at its
discretion.
Under all three plans, options granted, exercised, and expired, shares
issued and reserved, and grant prices have been restated for the effects
of any stock dividends or stock splits.
Regulatory capital requirements:
The Company and Bank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by Federal and State banking agencies. Failure
to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and
possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys
financial statements. The Company and Bank must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their respective assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under
regulatory accounting principles. The Companys and Banks capital
amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by
the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital
adequacy require the Company and Bank to maintain minimum amounts and
ratios (as defined in the regulations) of total and Tier I capital to
risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management
believes, as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, that both the Company
and Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
As of December 31, 2001, the most recent notification from the FDIC
categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the
Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier
I leverage ratios. There have been no conditions or events since that
notification that management believes have changed the Banks category.
A comparison of capital as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 with
minimum requirements is approximately as follows:
To Be Well Capitalized
For Capital
Under Prompt Corrective
Actual
Adequacy Purposes
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
$
25,254,000
13.9
%
$
14,514,000
8.0
%
N/A
24,361,000
13.5
%
14,458,000
8.0
%
$
18,072,000
10.0
%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
22,976,000
12.7
%
7,254,000
4.0
%
N/A
22,092,000
12.2
%
7,226,000
4.0
%
10,838,000
6.0
%
(to Average Assets)
22,976,000
8.8
%
10,456,000
4.0
%
N/A
22,092,000
8.5
%
10,421,000
4.0
%
13,026,000
5.0
%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
$
24,092,000
14.0
%
$
13,772,000
8.0
%
N/A
23,655,000
13.7
%
13,863,000
8.0
%
$
17,328,000
10.0%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
21,925,000
12.7
%
6,886,000
4.0
%
N/A
21,474,000
12.4
%
6,932,000
4.0
%
10,397,000
6.0
%
(to Average Assets)
21,925,000
9.3
%
9,424,000
4.0
%
N/A
21,474,000
9.1
%
9,424,000
4.0
%
11,780,000
5.0
%
To Be Well Capitalized
For Capital
Under
Prompt Corrective
Actual
Adequacy Purposes
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
$
16,912,000
10.8
%
$
12,527,000
8.0
%
N/A
16,586,000
10.3
%
12,870,000
8.0
%
$
16,087,000
10.0
%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
14,942,000
9.5
%
6,265,000
4.0
%
N/A
14,563,000
9.0
%
6,437,000
4.0
%
9,655,000
6.0
%
(to Average Assets)
14,942,000
6.8
%
8,815,000
4.0
%
N/A
14,563,000
6.6
%
8,813,000
4.0
%
11,016,000
5.0
%
Earnings per common share are calculated as follows:
2001
2000
1999
$
1,725,236
$
2,274,866
$
1,445,350
1,656,904
1,652,001
1,636,275
$
1.04
$
1.38
$
0.88
Diluted earnings per share calculations were not required for 2001 and
2000 since there were no outstanding options at December 31, 2001 and
2000.
Diluted earnings per share calculations were not required for 1999, due
to all options having an anti-dilutive effect and the Company having a
simple capital structure.
In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107, the
estimated fair value and the related carrying values of the Companys
financial instruments are as follows:
2001
2000
1999
Carrying
Fair
Carrying
Fair
Carrying
Fair
Amount
Value
Amount
Value
Amount
Value
Cash and due from banks
$
10,888,085
$
10,888,085
$
9,559,329
$
9,559,329
$
8,317,450
$
8,317,450
1,879,444
1,879,444
50,947
50,947
10,245
10,245
5,453,299
5,453,299
5,898,363
5,898,863
555,627
555,627
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
55,547,998
55,547,998
21,308,961
21,308,961
14,664,953
14,664,953
16,516,923
16,881,451
31,285,937
31,019,121
28,657,242
27,041,751
652,300
652,300
652,300
652,300
652,300
652,300
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
249,900
249,900
249,900
249,900
254,025
254,025
164,569,252
164,570,000
162,373,731
162,525,000
151,106,560
138,422,000
1,527,018
1,527,018
1,681,219
1,681,219
1,279,067
1,279,067
Deposits
229,306,718
231,692,000
205,968,337
205,969,000
194,089,995
194,002,000
882,408
882,408
487,978
487,978
2,464,936
2,464,936
7,274,791
7,274,791
7,296,523
7,296,523
195,333
195,333
213,345
213,345
136,666
136,666
155,174
155,174
195,166
195,166
152,555
152,555
171,518
171,518
166,986
166,986
5,155,000
5,155,000
5,155,000
5,155,000
17,616,563
17,466,563
12,469,737
12,364,095
15,501,742
15,430,119
1,257,361
1,257,361
1,237,878
1,237,878
1,384,969
1,384,969
For purposes of the disclosures of estimated fair value, the following
assumptions were used.
Loans:
The estimated fair value for loans is determined by discounting future
cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to
borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining
maturities.
Investment securities:
Estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices.
Deposits:
The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as
noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW accounts and money
market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The fair value of
certificates of deposit is based on the rates currently offered for
deposits of similar maturities. The fair value estimates do not include
the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the
deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the
market.
Other assets and liabilities:
The estimated fair values for cash and due from banks, interest-bearing
deposits in other financial institutions, Federal funds sold, accrued
interest receivable and payable, and short-term borrowings are considered
to approximate cost because of their short-term nature.
Other assets and liabilities of the Bank that are not defined as
financial instruments are not included in the above disclosures, such as
property and equipment. In addition, non-financial instruments typically
not recognized in the financial statements nevertheless may have value
but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among
other items, the estimated earnings power of core deposit accounts, the
trained work force, customer goodwill, and similar items.
In July 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 102,
Selected Loan Loss Allowance
Methodology and Documentation Issues
. SAB 102 summarizes certain SEC
views on the development, documentation, and application of a systematic
methodology as required by Financial Reporting Release No. 28 for
determining allowances for loan and lease losses in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. In particular, the guidance
focuses on the documentation the staff normally would expect registrants
to prepare and maintain in support of their allowance for credit losses.
Management believes the Bank is in compliance with the provisions of SAB
102.
In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141,
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141), Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS
142), and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
(SFAS 143). SFAS 141
requires all business combinations to be accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting and is effective for all business combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS 142 requires goodwill to be tested
for impairment under certain circumstances, and written off when
impaired, rather than being amortized as previous standards required.
SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.
Early application is permitted for entities with fiscal years beginning
after March 15, 2001 provided that the first interim period financial
statements have not been previously issued. SFAS 143 requires that the
fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be
recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate
of a fair value can be made. SFAS 143 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. In
managements opinion, the adoption of these statements will not have a
material impact on the financial position or the results of operations of
the Bank.
In August 2001, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement
supercedes SFAS 121, however, it retains most of its provisions. The
Bank is currently in compliance with this pronouncement.
On March 14, 2002, the Board of Directors of the Bank adopted an
amendment to the current post-retirement healthcare benefits plan (See
Note 11), which limits plan coverage to those members of the Board of
Directors and retirees, and their respective spouses, eligible to receive
post-retirement healthcare benefits during 2002. In addition, all
post-retirement healthcare benefits currently provided by the Bank to the
above qualified participants will terminate on December 31, 2006. All
affected plan participants were notified of this amendment by March 19,
2002. This amendment to the post-retirement healthcare plan will result
in a curtailment gain of approximately $764,000 in the first quarter of
2002 and reduce the accrued post-retirement benefit cost to approximately
$312,000.
The Balance Sheets, Statements of Income, and Statements of Cash Flows for
Glen Burnie Bancorp (Parent Only) are presented below:
Balance Sheets
December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
512,981
$
110,768
$
184,555
22,133,607
22,013,186
14,722,533
244,920
238,645
235,706
155,000
155,000
104,384
198,479
96,321
232,544
150,000
$
23,383,436
$
22,866,078
$
15,239,115
$
195,333
$
213,345
$
136,666
171,518
166,986
150,000
366,851
530,331
136,666
Glen Burnie Bancorp junior
subordinated debentures
5,155,000
5,155,000
1,663,560
1,110,049
1,093,496
10,390,511
10,373,549
10,149,247
5,970,537
5,544,305
4,013,171
(163,023
)
152,844
(153,465
)
17,861,585
17,180,747
15,102,449
$
23,383,436
$
22,866,078
$
15,239,115
F-33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 23. Parent Company Financial Information
(continued)
Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
1,750,000
$
475,000
$
350,000
16,430
(131,378
)
(131,378
)
(281,378
)
(550,962
)
(166,986
)
(42,156
)
(2,100
)
(1,078
)
1,041,934
174,536
67,544
240,739
102,158
96,035
442,563
1,998,172
1,281,771
$
1,725,236
$
2,274,866
$
1,445,350
F-34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 23. Parent Company Financial Information
(continued)
Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
1,725,236
$
2,274,866
$
1,445,350
(82,544
)
(150,000
)
94,095
(102,158
)
(91,533
)
(150,000
)
150,000
(4,503
)
4,532
166,986
(442,563
)
(1,998,172
)
(1,281,771
)
1,148,756
341,522
67,543
(155,000
)
(5,000,000
)
(60,000
)
(5,155,000
)
(60,000
)
168,026
201,755
106,149
5,155,000
49,989
270,566
(148,750
)
(138
)
(765,819
)
(667,053
)
(438,791
)
(746,543
)
4,739,691
(62,214
)
402,213
(73,787
)
(54,671
)
110,768
184,555
239,226
$
512,981
$
110,768
$
184,555
F-35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 24. Quarterly Results of Operations
(Unaudited)
The following is a summary of the Consolidated unaudited quarterly results
of operations:
2001
(Dollars in thousands,
Three months ended,
except per share amounts)
December 31
September 30
June 30
March 31
$
4,316
$
4,297
$
4,303
$
4,291
1,564
1,627
1,598
1,744
2,752
2,670
2,705
2,547
(150
)
89
137
29
18
404
825
485
599
330
586
377
432
$
0.20
$
0.35
$
0.23
$
0.27
2000
(Dollars in thousands,
Three months ended,
except per share amounts)
December 31
September 30
June 30
March 31
$
4,415
$
4,141
$
4,318
$
3,829
1,688
1,478
1,392
1,344
2,727
2,663
2,926
2,485
(26
)
1,159
685
1,330
539
612
466
830
367
$
0.70
$
0.42
$
0.66
$
0.29
1999
(Dollars in thousands,
Three months ended,
except per share amounts)
December 31
September 30
June 30
March 31
$
3,894
$
3,957
$
3,802
$
3,895
1,428
1,410
1,379
1,406
2,466
2,547
2,423
2,489
300
(93
)
2
2
25
1,156
626
553
296
487
403
361
194
$
0.52
$
0.37
$
0.29
$
0.15
The sum of the quarters for each fiscal year presented may not equal the
annual total amounts due to rounding.
(1)
Results have been restated to reflect a positive amendment to the
post-retirement benefit plan, made during the first quarter 2001. Income
before income taxes and net income for each quarter have been decreased
by $58 and $35, respectively, as a result of this amendment. Net income
per share (basic and diluted) has also been changed to reflect these
restatements. Due to these restatements the first, second and third
quarters do not match the amounts reported in the Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC.
F-36
EXHIBIT 10.3
THE BANK OF GLEN BURNIE
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHANGE-IN-CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
The Board of Directors of The Bank of Glen Burnie and Glen Burnie Bancorp adopted a Change-in-Control Severance Plan effective February 12, 1998 in order to provide severance benefits upon a Change in Control for directors and for employees who are not otherwise covered by an existing employment agreement or change-in-control severance agreement. On August 9, 2001, the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the Plan which are incorporated into this Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Plan.
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
The following words and phrases, when used in the Plan with an initial capital letter, shall have the meanings set forth below unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
1.1 "AFFILIATE" shall mean any "parent corporation" or "subsidiary corporation" of the Company, as such terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and (f), respectively, of the Code.
1.2 "BANK" shall mean The Bank of Glen Burnie, and any successor to its interest.
1.3 "BASE PAY" shall be determined on the date of a Change in Control, and shall mean:
(a) with respect to Participants paid on a salaried basis: the regular weekly gross rate of salary payable to such Participant in accordance with the Employer's usual payroll procedures; and
(b) with respect to each Participant paid on an hourly basis: an amount equal to the product of (i) the Participant's straight time gross hourly wage rate, exclusive of overtime, and (ii) the number of hours that the Participant is regularly scheduled to work for the Employer per week.
1.4 "BOARD" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Bank or the Company, as the case may be.
1.5 "CHANGE IN CONTROL" shall mean any one of the following
events: (i) the acquisition of ownership, holding or power to vote more than 25%
of the Bank's or the Company's voting stock, (ii) the acquisition of the ability
to control the election of a majority of the Bank's or the Company's directors,
(iii) the acquisition of a controlling influence over the management or policies
of the Bank or the Company by any person or by persons acting as a "group"
(within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), or
(iv) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals (the "CONTINUING
DIRECTORS") who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of
Directors of the Bank or the Company (the "EXISTING BOARD") cease for any reason
to constitute at least two-thirds thereof, provided that any individual whose
election or nomination for election as a member of the Existing Board was
approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Continuing Directors then in
office shall be considered a Continuing Director.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of (i), (ii) and (iii) hereof, ownership or control of the Bank by the Company itself shall not constitute a Change in Control. For purposes of this paragraph only, the term "person" refers to an individual or a corporation, partnership, trust, association, joint venture, pool, syndicate, sole proprietorship, unincorporated organization or any other form of entity not specifically listed herein. The decision of the Board as to whether or not a Change in Control has occurred shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.
1.6 "CODE" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and as interpreted through applicable rulings and regulations in effect from time to time.
1.7 "COMPANY" shall mean Glen Burnie Bancorp, and any successor to its interest.
1.8 "CONTINUOUS SERVICE" shall mean the period of a Participant's employment as an active employee of the Employer or service as a member of the Board, as the case may be. Continuous Service shall not be considered interrupted by (i) sick leave, military leave, or any other leave of absence approved by the Bank or the Company, or (ii) transfers between payroll locations of the Company, the Bank, an Affiliate, or a successor.
1.9 "EFFECTIVE DATE" shall mean February 12, 1998.
1.10 "EMPLOYER" shall mean the Bank, the Company, or an Affiliate, as the case may be, which employs the Participant or of which the Participant is a Board member.
1.11 "JUST CAUSE" shall mean, in the good faith determination of the Board, the Participant's willful misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit, intentional failure to perform stated duties, willful violation of any law, rule or regulation (other than traffic violations or similar offenses) or final cease-and-desist order. No act, or failure to act, on the Participant's part shall be considered "willful" unless he or she has acted, or failed to act, with an absence of good faith and without a reasonable belief that such action or failure to act was in the best interest of the Bank and the Company.
1.12 "MEDICAL BENEFITS" shall mean Employer-paid premiums for COBRA coverage under the health care plan then offered to active employees of the Employer or its successor, but only in the event the Participant elects to receive COBRA benefits.
1.13 "PARTICIPANT" shall mean any employee or Board member of an Employer who qualifies for participation in the Plan pursuant to the requirements of Article II hereof.
1.14 "PLAN" means The Bank of Glen Burnie Change-in-Control Severance Plan as it may be amended from time to time.
1.15 "PROTECTED PERIOD" shall mean the period that begins on the date of a Change in Control and ends on the second annual anniversary date of the Change in Control.
1.16 "SEVERANCE BENEFITS" shall mean the Severance Payment and Medical Benefits payable hereunder to a Participant following a Change in Control as set forth in Article III hereof.
1.17 "SEVERANCE PAYMENT" shall mean the cash amount payable to the Participant as part of the Severance Benefits hereunder.
1.18 "TRUST" shall mean a grantor trust designed in accordance with Revenue Procedure 92-64 and having a trustee independent of the Bank and the Company.
1.19 "YEARS OF SERVICE" means a Participant's full 12-month periods of Continuous Service (including full 12-month periods that may have occurred prior to any interruption in Continuous Service).
ARTICLE II
PARTICIPATION
Participation in the Plan shall be limited to employees and Board members of an Employer who, on the date of a Change in Control, are not parties to an employment agreement or change in control severance agreement with the Bank, the Company, or an Affiliate.
ARTICLE III
CONDITIONS FOR PAYMENT OF SEVERANCE BENEFITS;
AMOUNT OF SEVERANCE BENEFITS
3.1 CONDITIONS FOR PAYMENT OF SEVERANCE BENEFITS. A
Participant shall be entitled to collect the Severance Benefits set forth in
Section 3.2 of the Plan in the event that (i) the Participant voluntarily
terminates employment or Board service, as the case may be, during the Protected
Period, or (ii) the Bank or the Company or their successor(s) in interest
terminate the Participant's employment or Board service, as the case may be, for
any reason other than Just Cause during the Protected Period.
3.2 AMOUNT OF SEVERANCE BENEFITS. If a Participant becomes entitled to Severance Benefits pursuant to Section 3.1 hereof, the Bank shall provide the Participant with the Severance Payment and Medical Benefits, if any, in each instance based on the Participant's position with the Employer and, in some instances, Years of Service on the date of the Change in Control, as set forth on the Schedule of Severance Benefits attached hereto as it may be amended by resolution of the Board from time to time. To the extent the Severance Payment on such Schedule is expressed in a number of weeks, the amount of such Severance Payment shall be determined by multiplying such Participant's Base Pay by such number of weeks. If the Severance Benefits include Medical Benefits, the Participant shall be entitled to Medical Benefits up to the dollar amount set forth on such Schedule. Each Participant shall be entitled to COBRA benefits for the period of time mandated by COBRA commencing on the date the Participant's employment terminated. The amount of any Medical Benefits hereunder shall be used to pay the Participant's (and any of the Participant's covered dependents') health care plan premiums pursuant to such COBRA coverage, up to the aggregate dollar amount of such Medical Benefits.
3.3 TIME OF PAYMENT. The amount of the Severance Payment will be paid in either (i) a lump sum amount within ten days of the later of (a) the date of the Change in Control and (b) the Participant's last day of employment or service with the Employer, or a successor to its interest, or (ii) in equal installments on the Employer's regular pay days. Installments will be paid over the period of time equal to the number of weeks of the Participant's Base Pay to be paid. A Participant shall select the method of payment by signing the Election of Payment Statement in the form attached hereto and delivering such signed Statement to the Company upon termination of employment or service pursuant to Section 3.1 hereof.
ARTICLE IV
JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY
The Company shall be liable, jointly and severally, with the Bank for the payment of all amounts due under this Plan.
ARTICLE V
SOURCE OF BENEFITS
5.1 GENERAL RULE. All amounts payable under this Plan shall constitute an unfunded, unsecured promise by the Bank and the Company to make such payments in the future, as and to the extent such benefits become payable. Severance Benefits shall be paid from the general assets of the Bank and the Company, and no person shall by virtue of this Plan have any interest in such assets (other than as an unsecured creditor of the Bank and the Company).
5.2 TRUST FUNDING ON CHANGE IN CONTROL. In the event of a Change in Control, the Bank shall establish the Trust if one is not then in existence, and shall contribute to the Trust an amount sufficient to provide the Trust with assets having an overall value equivalent to the cash value of the aggregate Severance Benefits that could become payable pursuant to Section 3.2 under the Plan.
ARTICLE VI
TRANSFER OF BENEFITS
6.1 Except as provided herein, a Participant may not commute, sell, assign, transfer, encumber and pledge or otherwise convey the right to receive any benefits under this Plan.
6.2 Upon the death of a Participant receiving Severance Benefits, the beneficiary(ies) of the Participant shall be entitled to receive the Severance Benefits to which the Participant is entitled under Section 3.2. A Participant shall designate such beneficiary(ies) by completing and signing the Designation of Beneficiaries Statement in the form attached hereto and delivering such signed Statement to the Company upon termination of employment or service pursuant to Section 3.1 hereof.
ARTICLE VII
EMPLOYMENT OR OTHER RIGHTS
Neither the Plan nor any action taken by the Board in connection with the Plan shall create any right, either express or implied, on the part of any Participant to continue in the employment or service of the Employer.
ARTICLE VIII
REORGANIZATION
The Bank and the Company agree that they will not merge or consolidate with any other corporation or organization, or permit their business activities to be taken over by any other organization, unless and until the succeeding or continuing corporation or other organization shall expressly assume the rights and obligations of the Bank and the Company herein set forth. The Bank and the Company further agree that they will not cease their business activities or terminate their existence, other than as heretofore set forth in this Article VIII, without having made adequate provision for the fulfillment of their obligations hereunder.
ARTICLE IX
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time prior to a Change in Control. On or after a Change in Control, the Board may amend or terminate the Plan subject to receiving the written consent of each Participant who is or may be adversely affected by such amendment or termination.
ARTICLE X
APPLICABLE LAW
Except to the extent preempted by Federal law, the laws of the State of Maryland shall govern this Plan in all respects, whether as to its validity, construction, capacity, performance or otherwise.
ARTICLE XI
HEADINGS; GENDER
Headings and subheadings in this Plan are inserted for convenience and reference only and constitute no part of this Plan. This Plan shall be construed, where required, so that the masculine gender includes the feminine.
ARTICLE XII
INTERPRETATION OF THE PLAN
The Board shall have sole and absolute discretion to administer, construe, and interpret the Plan and the decisions of the Board shall be conclusive and binding on all affected parties (unless such decisions are arbitrary and capricious).
ARTICLE XIII
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
In the event that any dispute arises on or after a Change in Control between a Participant and the Bank or the Company as to the terms or interpretation of this Plan, whether instituted by formal legal proceedings or
otherwise, including any action that the Participant takes to enforce the terms of this Plan or to defend against any action taken by the Bank or the Company, the Participant shall be reimbursed for all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from such dispute, proceedings or actions, provided that the Participant shall obtain a final judgement in favor of the Participant in a court of competent jurisdiction or in binding arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Such reimbursement shall be paid within ten (10) days of Participant's furnishing to the Bank and the Company written evidence, which may be in the form, among other things, of a canceled check or receipt, of any costs or expenses incurred by the Participant.
ARTICLE XIV
CLAIMS PROCEDURE
14.1 GENERAL RULE. This Section is based on final regulations issued by the Department of Labor and published in the Federal Register on November 21, 2000 and codified at 29 C.F.R. Section 2560.503-1. If any provision of this Section conflicts with the requirements of those regulations, the requirements of those regulations will prevail.
14.2 INITIAL CLAIMS.
(a) If a Participant or a Participant's spouse, dependent or beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as a "CLAIMANT") is denied any Severance Benefit under this Plan, the Claimant may file a claim with the Employer. The Employer shall review the claim itself or appoint an individual or an entity to review the claim.
(b) The Claimant shall be notified within 90 days after the claim is filed whether the claim is allowed or denied, unless the Claimant receives written notice from the Chief Financial Officer of the Company or his/her appointee prior to the end of the 90 day period stating that special circumstances require an extension of the time for decision, such extension not to extend beyond the day which is 180 days after the day the claim is filed.
(c) For purposes of the time periods specified in this Section, the period of time during which a benefit determination is required to be made begins at the time a claim is filed in accordance with the Plan procedures without regard to whether all the information necessary to make a decision accompanies the claim. If a period of time is extended due to a Claimant's failure to submit all information necessary, the period for making the determination shall be tolled from the date the notification is sent to the Claimant until the date the Claimant responds.
14.3 DENIAL OF CLAIM. If the Employer denies a claim, it must provide to the Claimant, in writing or by electronic communication:
(a) The specific reasons for the denial;
(b) A reference to the Plan provision or insurance contract provision upon which the denial is based;
(c) A description of any additional information or material that the Claimant must provide in order to perfect the claim;
(d) An explanation of why such additional material or information is necessary;
(e) Notice that the Claimant has a right to request a review of the claim denial and information on the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to request a review of the claim denial; and
(f) A statement of the participant's right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following a denial on review of the initial denial.
14.4 REVIEW PROCEDURES.
(a) A request for review of a denied claim must be made in writing to the Employer within 60 days after receiving notice of denial. The decision upon review will be made within 60 days after the Employer's receipt of a request for review, unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, in which case a decision will be rendered not later than 120 days after receipt of a request for review. A notice of such an extension must be provided to the Claimant within the initial 60 day period and must explain the special circumstances and provide an expected date of decision.
(b) The reviewer shall afford the Claimant an opportunity to review and receive, without charge, all relevant documents, information and records and to submit issues and comments in writing to the Employer. The reviewer shall take into account all comments, documents, records and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim regardless of whether the information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination.
(c) Upon completion of its review of an adverse initial claim determination, the Employer will give the Claimant, in writing or by electronic notification, a notice containing:
(i) its decision;
(ii) the specific reasons for the decision;
(iii) the relevant Plan provisions or insurance contract provisions on which its decision is based;
(iv) a statement that the Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and without charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information in the Plan's files which is relevant to the Claimant's claim for benefits;
(v) a statement describing the Claimant's right to bring an action for judicial review under ERISA Section 502(a); and
(vi) if an internal rule, guideline, protocol or other similar criterion was relied upon in making the adverse determination on review, a statement that a copy of the rule, guideline, protocol or other similar criterion will be provided without charge to the Claimant upon request.
14.5 FAILURE OF PLAN TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES. If the Plan fails to follow the claims procedures required by this Article, a Claimant shall be deemed to have exhausted the administrative remedies available under the Plan and shall be entitled to pursue any available remedy under ERISA section 502(a) on the basis that the Plan has failed to provide a reasonable claims procedure that would yield a decision on the merits of the claim.
ARTICLE XV
SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this Plan shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof.
THE BANK OF GLEN BURNIE
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHANGE-IN-CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
SCHEDULE OF SEVERANCE BENEFITS
All capitalized terms used in this Schedule shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
POSITION YEARS OF SERVICE SEVERANCE PAYMENT MEDICAL BENEFITS -------- ---------------- ----------------- ---------------- President N/A * N/A Chairman N/A $250,000 N/A EVP/COO N/A * N/A Senior VP 10 and more 130 Weeks* $10,000* Less than 10 104 Weeks* $10,000* Vice President 10 and more 104 Weeks* $10,000* 5 and more, less than 10 80 Weeks* $10,000* Less than 5 52 Weeks* $10,000* Other Officers 10 and more 52 Weeks* $10,000* 5 and more, less than 10 36 Weeks* $10,000* Less than 5 18 Weeks* $10,000* Directors * N/A Other Employees 1 and more 2 weeks, plus 2 weeks for N/A each year of service up to an aggregate of 52 weeks* Less than 1 N/A N/A |
* The aggregate present value of Severance Benefits (including Severance Payments and Medical Benefits) under the Plan at the time of termination of employment or service (plus any payments under any other plan of the Company or its Affiliates which are contingent on a change of control), determined in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 280G, may not exceed 2.99 times the Participant's average annual taxable compensation from the Company or its Affiliates which is included in the Participant's gross income for the five taxable years of the Company (or such portion of such five year period during which the Participant performed personal services for the Company or its Affiliates) ending before the date on which the Change in Control occurs (the "2.99 MAXIMUM"). If no amount of Severance Payment is specified, then the Severance Payment, together with any Medical Benefits, shall equal the 2.99 Maximum.
THE BANK OF GLEN BURNIE
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHANGE-IN-CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
ELECTION OF PAYMENT STATEMENT
Reference is made to The Bank of Glen Burnie and Glen Burnie Bancorp Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Plan (the "PLAN") dated as of __________, 2001. All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
Pursuant to the terms of Section 3.3 of the Plan, I hereby elect to receive my Severance Payment benefits in:
[ ] installments paid over the period of time equal to the number of weeks of Base Pay to be paid under Section 3.2 of the Plan
[ ] one lump sum payment
PARTICIPANT:
THE BANK OF GLEN BURNIE
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHANGE-IN-CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARIES STATEMENT
Reference is made to The Bank of Glen Burnie and Glen Burnie Bancorp Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Plan (the "PLAN") dated as of __________, 2001. All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
Pursuant to the terms of Section 6.2 of the Plan, the Participant designates the individuals set forth below as the primary and secondary beneficiary(ies) to receive Severance Benefits upon the death of the Participant. If the primary beneficiary(ies) predeceases the Participant, or survives the Participant but dies before all installment payments (if any) are made, the unpaid Severance Benefits shall be paid to the secondary beneficiary(ies). If more than one primary or secondary beneficiary has been designated, each primary beneficiary or, if none survives, each secondary beneficiary will receive an equal share of the unpaid benefits unless the Participant indicates specific percentages next to the beneficiaries' names. The Participant may change such designations from time to time by the execution of a new Designation of Beneficiaries Statement and delivering such Schedule to the Company.
PRIMARY
Name(s): Relationship(s) --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- SECONDARY Name(s): Relationship(s) --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- PARTICIPANT: --------------------------- --------------------------- (print name) Date: -------------------- |
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
The Bank of Glen Burnie, a Maryland corporation
GBB Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation
Glen Burnie Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut statutory trust
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-37073, and Registration Statements on Form S-8, File No. 333-46943 and File No. 033-62280.
TRICE GEARY & MYERS LLC
Salisbury, Maryland
March 21, 2002