UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-3671
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization
13-1673581
I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
3190 Fairview Park Drive, Falls Church, Virginia
Address of principal executive offices
22042-4523
Zip Code
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(703) 876-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, Par Value $1.00 Per Share
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange
Pacific Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. X
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $16,531,716,743 at March 7, 2002.
201,285,731 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding at March 7, 2002.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Parts I and II incorporate information from certain portions of the registrants Annual Report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (the 2001 Annual Report).
Part III incorporates information from certain portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for the 2002 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
Certain sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain
forward-looking statements, which are based on managements expectations,
estimates, projections and assumptions. Words such as expects, anticipates,
plans, believes, scheduled, estimates, and variations of these words
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements
which include but are not limited to projections of revenues, earnings, segment
performance, cash flows, contract awards, aircraft production, deliveries and
backlog stability. Forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as
amended. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Therefore,
actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is forecast in
forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without
limitation: the companys successful execution of internal performance plans;
general U.S. and international political and economic conditions; changing
priorities or reductions in the U.S. government defense budget; termination of
government contracts due to unilateral government action; changing customer
demand or preferences for business aircraft; reliance on a large fleet
customer for a significant portion of the firm aircraft contracts backlog and
the majority of the options backlog; performance issues with key suppliers and
subcontractors; the status or outcome of legal and/or regulatory proceedings;
and the timing and occurrence (or non-occurrence) of circumstances beyond the
companys control. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of
this report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date
of that document. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to the company or any person acting on the companys behalf are
qualified by the cautionary statements in this section. The company does not
undertake any obligation to update or publicly release any revisions to
forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances or changes in
expectations after the date of this report.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Business Overview
The company is a Delaware corporation formed in 1952 as successor to the
Electric Boat Company. The companys businesses include information and
communications technology, land and amphibious combat systems, naval and
commercial shipbuilding, and business aviation. These are high technology
businesses that use design, manufacturing and program management expertise
together with advanced technology and the integration of complex systems as
part of their everyday operations.
In the mid 1990s, the company began a series of acquisitions that
expanded its core businesses in the defense industry, broadened its expertise
in systems integration and C4ISR (command and control, communications,
computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) systems, and added
business aviation products and services to the companys offerings. Since
January 1, 1997, the company has acquired 21 businesses, including five
acquisitions during 2001. In late January, the company acquired Primex
Technologies, Inc., renamed Ordnance and Tactical Systems, expanding the
companys market position in ordnance manufacturing to include medium- and
large- caliber ammunition. This acquisition also expanded the companys
portfolio in what it believes to be the high growth areas of missile and
precision-guided munitions through existing subcontract relationships. In
mid-February, the company acquired four aircraft service and maintenance
facilities from BBA North America. These operations now conduct business as
General Dynamics Aviation Services, and are located in Dallas, Las Vegas,
Minneapolis and West Palm Beach. In early June, the company acquired
substantially all of the assets of Galaxy Aerospace Company LP. This
acquisition broadened the Gulfstream product line with the mid-size Gulfstream
100 and the super mid-size Gulfstream 200 creating market-entry, add-on and
move-up opportunities for a wider range of customers. In late July, the
company acquired Spains leading defense manufacturer, Empresa Nacional Santa
Bárbara de Industrias Militares, S.A., of Madrid, Spain, and Santa Bárbara
Blindados, S.A., of Seville. The new combined entity, renamed Santa Bárbara
Sistemas, S.A., produces combat vehicles and munitions and is expected to
enhance the companys export abilities into Europe, North Africa and South
America. Also, at the end of September, the company acquired Integrated
Information Systems Group from Motorola, Inc. Renamed Decision Systems, this
business provides technologies, products and systems that strengthen the
companys position in what management believes to be rapidly growing
information assurance, communications and situational awareness markets here
and abroad.
1
The company operates in four primary business groups: Information Systems
and Technology, Combat Systems, Marine Systems, and Aerospace. The company
also owns certain commercial operations, which are identified for reporting
purposes as Other. Information on revenues, operating profit and identifiable
assets attributable to each of the companys reportable business groups is
included in Note S to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 46 of the
2001 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference. A
description of the companys products and services by business group,
competition and other related information is provided below.
Industry Overview
The companys primary customers are the U.S. military, other government
organizations, the armed forces of allied nations, and a diverse base of
corporate and industrial buyers. Historically, a significant portion of the
companys sales has been to the U.S. government and its agencies. As a result,
funding for the companys products and services is generally linked to trends
in U.S. and international defense spending.
Following a period of budget decreases in the post-Cold War era, the U.S.
defense budget, as appropriated by Congress, has increased in recent years. The
Bush Administration submitted to Congress a $328 billion fiscal 2002 defense
budget that reflected an 11 percent increase over the fiscal 2001 defense
budget submitted by the Clinton Administration, representing the first
double-digit increase since Operation Desert Storm. The 2003 U.S. defense
budget proposal President Bush sent to Congress calls for increased procurement
spending of $68.7 billion in 2003, reaching $98.9 billion by 2007. The company
expects that the U.S. defense budgets for research, development, test and
evaluation, and procurement, both of which fund the companys programs, will
grow proportionately with the overall level of defense spending. While the
ultimate distribution of the defense budget remains uncertain, the company
believes it is well positioned to benefit from the increase in defense
spending.
The company expects to see long-term growth in the business aviation
sector as well. The addition of the mid- and super mid-size aircraft should
allow the company to increase its sales in the business aviation market. The
company also expects to increase its penetration of the special mission
aircraft markets for U.S. and international defense forces. The future success
of the companys commercial aircraft business is dependent on a number of
factors, some of which are beyond the companys control. These factors include
general economic conditions, price and demand pressures in the market, the
companys ability to continue to achieve efficiencies necessary to realize
expected margins, and the companys ability to meet planned timetables for the
development, certification and delivery of new product offerings.
Products and Services
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY
The Information Systems and Technology group provides defense and
commercial customers with infrastructure and systems integration skills
required to process, communicate and manage information effectively. The group
has market-leading positions in the design, deployment and maintenance of
wireline and wireless voice and data networks; C4ISR systems;
telecommunications system security; encryption; fiber optics; and lifecycle management and support. The groups collective
expertise in systems design and in key platform subsystems helps the companys
Combat Systems, Marine Systems and Aerospace business groups to improve their products while maintaining a
prime systems integration role.
Net sales for the Information Systems and Technology group as a percentage
of the companys consolidated net sales were 23 percent in both 2001 and 2000
and 16 percent in 1999. Net sales (in millions) for the group were $2,800,
$2,388 and $1,422, in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
The companys Canadian and U.K. domiciled operations are part of this
business group. In 2001, the U.K. operation commenced work on the BOWMAN
contract, a $2.4 billion program to design and implement a secure digital voice
and data communications system for the U.K. armed forces.
The Information Systems and Technology group is pursuing new opportunities
in networks and C4ISR systems for defense customers, as well as selected
opportunities in the international and commercial markets.
2
COMBAT SYSTEMS
The Combat Systems group provides systems integration, design,
development, production and support for armored vehicles, armaments, munitions
and components. Its product lines include a full spectrum of armored vehicles;
unmanned systems; suspensions, engines and transmissions; medium-caliber guns;
ammunition handling systems, turrets and turret drive systems; medium- and
large-caliber ammunition; missile components and propellants; space propulsion
systems and reactive armor.
Net sales for the Combat Systems group were 18 percent, 12 percent and 14
percent of the companys consolidated net sales for 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Net sales (in millions) by major products and services were as
follows:
Armored vehicles and related services
The company designs and manufactures the M1 Series Abrams Main Battle Tank
for the U.S. Army and various foreign governments. The company also performs
engineering and upgrade work, and provides support for existing armored
vehicles. The company recently completed a five-year multiyear contract with
the Army under which 580 tanks were upgraded from the M1 to the M1A2 and M1A2
System Enhancement Package (SEP) configurations. The company is currently in
production on a follow-on contract to upgrade an additional 307 tanks to the
M1A2 SEP configuration. As of December 31, 2001, 265 tanks remain to be
upgraded, with deliveries scheduled through 2004.
The company is under contract with the Marine Corps for the systems
development and demonstration phase of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle
(AAAV). Under this phase, the company expects to complete the design and
development of the AAAV, manufacture 10 new prototypes, refurbish three early
development prototypes and prepare for the production phase of the program.
The company and General Motors Canada Ltd. have entered into a joint
venture to equip the U.S. Armys Brigade Combat Teams with an eight-wheeled
armored vehicle called the Stryker. Pursuant to the joint venture, the company
will share in the development, testing, evaluation and production of 2,131
vehicles.
In Spain, the company is under contracts to provide to the Spanish army
235 Leopard main battle tanks, built under license from a German company, and
48 Pizarro tracked infantry fighting vehicles.
Armament and munitions
The company provides a total range of armament system capabilities
including design, development, production and lifecycle management. Products
include medium- and large-caliber ammunition, propellants, armament and
satellite propulsion products. The company provides systems management and has
produced over 300,000 rockets, warheads and motors for the Armys 2.75-inch
Hydra 70 rocket system. Also, the company manufactures single- and
multi-barrel medium-caliber gun systems, individual- and crew-served weapons,
and reactive armor tiles for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
3
MARINE SYSTEMS
The Marine Systems group provides the U.S. Navy with combat vessels,
including nuclear submarines, surface combatants and auxiliary ships. The
group also provides ship management services for the U.S. government and builds
commercial ships.
Net sales for the Marine Systems group were 30 percent, 33 percent and 34
percent of the companys consolidated net sales for 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Net sales (in millions) by major products and services were as
follows:
Nuclear submarines and related services
The company designs, builds and supports nuclear submarines for the Navy.
The company has construction contracts for the first four ships of the
Virginia
-class submarine and the third of three
Seawolf
-class attack
submarines. Construction work on the
Virginia
-class submarine is shared equally
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.
In addition to nuclear submarine design and construction, the company
performs a broad range of engineering work, including advanced research and
technology development, systems and component design evaluation, prototype
development and logistics support for the operating fleet. The company also
serves as ship integrator for certain components and subassemblies of the
submarines, such as electronic equipment.
The company will also have design, engineering and construction management
responsibilities for the conversion of four
Trident-
class SSBN submarines to cruise
missile SSGNs. As SSGNs, these submarines will be delivery platforms for
cruise missiles, special operations forces and advanced payloads and sensors.
Surface combatants
The company has been awarded contracts to date for the construction of 27
Arleigh Burke
-class destroyers (DDG-51) and plays a lead role in providing
design, engineering and ongoing lifecycle support services for these ships.
The company is also a member of a three-contractor team that was awarded a
contract to design and build the Navys new
San Antonio
-class of amphibious
assault ships. The company has a contract for the construction of the third
ship of the class, the LPD-19.
During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Navy canceled its DD-21 program and
transferred its investment in technology development to DD(X), the next
generation family of combatants. In February 2002, a team led by the company,
formerly the prime contractor for the design phase of the previous DD-21
program, submitted a proposal for the DD(X). It is anticipated that a design
will be selected and an award made for the research and design work on the
DD(X) in the spring of 2002.
Auxiliary and commercial ships
The company designs, builds and repairs ships for the Navy and commercial
customers. The company has been awarded contracts to date for the design and
construction of eight strategic sealift ships and two dry-cargo combat
logistics ships for the Navy. Contracts with commercial customers include the
construction of two cargo ships and four double-hull crude oil tankers. The
company also manages 23 ready-reserve, fast sealift and prepositioning ships
for the U.S. government.
4
AEROSPACE
The Aerospace group designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and provides
maintenance and support services for technologically advanced business jet
aircraft. The group also supplies special mission aircraft to governments.
Gulfstream has delivered more than 1,300 aircraft for customers
around the world and offers a range of aircraft products and services,
including the Gulfstream IV-SP, the Gulfstream V and the Gulfstream V-SP.
Certification and initial customer deliveries of the Gulfstream V-SP are
expected in the fourth quarter of 2002. The mid-size Gulfstream 100 and super
mid-size Gulfstream 200 were added to the groups offering with its
acquisition of the assets of Galaxy Aerospace Company LP in June 2001.
Net sales for the Aerospace group were 27 percent, 29 percent and 32 percent of the
companys consolidated net sales for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Net
sales (in millions) by major products and services were as follows:
New aircraft
Aerospaces products include the Gulfstream IV-SP, which serves the
large-cabin business jet aircraft market and the Gulfstream V, which serves the
ultra-long range market. The company believes the Gulfstream IV-SP and
Gulfstream V offer the best combination of large cabin size, fast cruising
speed and technologically advanced avionics of any large business jet aircraft
in both the long and ultra-long range market segments. The Gulfstream V-SP,
which will also serve the ultra-long range market, will offer increased range,
increased mission flexibility for both ultra-long range and high-speed
long-range flights, reduced takeoff field length, and increased cabin and
baggage space.
In 2001, the Aerospace group introduced the mid-size Gulfstream 100 and
the super mid-size Gulfstream 200. These two aircraft models have expanded the
companys product offering so that it now includes a broad range of aircraft
priced from $12 million to $46 million.
Aircraft services and pre-owned aircraft
The Aerospace group also provides worldwide aircraft maintenance services
and technical support for both Gulfstream and other business aircraft. The
company provides an integrated network of company-owned service centers,
authorized third-party service providers, worldwide parts depots, worldwide
service representatives and 24 hour-a-day technical/aircraft on-the-ground
support.
The Aerospace group routinely accepts pre-owned aircraft in trade to
facilitate the sale of new Gulfstream aircraft. These aircraft are then resold
by the company in the pre-owned market.
OTHER
The companys Other businesses consist of a coal mining operation, an
aggregates operation and a leasing operation for liquefied natural gas tankers.
Net sales for these businesses represented approximately two percent of the
companys consolidated net sales in each of the last three years. Net sales
(in millions) were $276, $253 and $250, in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
5
Competition
Virtually all of the products produced and sold by the company are highly
engineered and require sophisticated manufacturing and system integration
techniques and capabilities. Additionally, the product and program needs of
the companys government and commercial customers regularly change and evolve.
The companys ability to successfully compete is highly dependent on the
technical excellence and reliability of the companys products and services,
its reputation for integrating complex systems, the ability of the companys
leadership team to successfully manage the companys businesses and respond to
the changing needs of the companys customers, and the cost competitiveness of
the companys products and services.
DEFENSE CONTRACTS
U.S. and global defense industry consolidation continues to intensify
competition as the number of defense contractors decreases. As a result of
this consolidation, the company frequently is a partner with, or subcontractor
to, a defense supplier on one project, while simultaneously competing against
that contractor for another award. These strategic partnerships and
relationships improve the companys ability to obtain new business, but also
make it crucial for the company to differentiate itself from its competitors.
BUSINESS AIRCRAFT
The business aircraft market is generally divided into segments based on
the cabin size and range of the aircraft. Aerospace offers its aircraft
products in the mid-size, the super mid-size and the long and ultra-long range
large-cabin segments. The Gulfstream IV-SP competes in the large-cabin
business aircraft market segment with the Dassault Falcon 900C and 900EX. The
Gulfstream V and Gulfstream V-SP compete in the ultra-long range business
aircraft market segment against the Bombardier Global Express. Two competitors
announced new products during 2001 that will compete with the Gulfstream IV-SP
and Gulfstream V. The Bombardier Global 5000 has an expected market
introduction in 2004, and the Dassault Falcon 7X is expected to be introduced in
2006.
One of the companys newest aircraft products, the Gulfstream 100,
competes in the mid-cabin market segment against the Raytheon Hawker 800XP
aircraft and the Bombardier LearJet 60 aircraft. The Gulfstream 100 has the
fastest speed and longest range as compared to these two competitive aircraft.
The Gulfstream 200 competes in a new market segment the super mid-cabin
market. The Gulfstream 200 was introduced in the market in late 1999, two
years ahead of two new competitive products Bombardiers Continental due for
customer delivery in 2002 and Raytheons Hawker Horizon due for customer
delivery in 2003.
The company believes that it competes favorably in its markets on the
basis of the performance characteristics of its aircraft, the quality and
timeliness of the service it provides, as well as its innovative marketing
programs. In addition, the company was able to certify the Gulfstream V
significantly in advance of its competition and has maintained a substantial
market lead. The company believes that the introduction of the second
generation of the ultra-long range business jet, the Gulfstream V-SP, will
enable the company to maintain or increase its position in this important
market segment. Further, the company believes its aircrafts operating costs
are comparable to or lower than those of its competitors and that its products
are competitively priced.
Customers
Historically, the majority of the companys sales were to the U.S.
government and its agencies. In 2001, 60 percent of the companys net sales
were to the U.S. government, either as a prime contractor or as a
subcontractor; 30 percent of the companys net sales were to U.S. commercial
customers and six percent to international commercial customers; and the
remaining four percent were directly to international defense customers.
6
U.S. GOVERNMENT
Net sales to the U.S. government include Foreign Military Sales (FMS),
which are sales to foreign governments through the U.S. government, whereby the
company contracts with and receives payment from the U.S. government and the
U.S. government assumes the risk of collection from the customer. U.S.
government sales (in millions) were as follows:
The companys U.S. government products and programs must compete with the
products and programs of other defense contractors. The funding of government
programs is dependent on congressional appropriations and administrative
allotment of funds, and may be affected by changes in government policies
resulting from various military and political developments. In addition,
funding for defense programs competes with nondefense spending of the U.S.
government. A shift in government defense spending to other programs in which
the company is not involved or a reduction in defense spending generally could
negatively impact the companys revenues and earnings.
The company acts as a prime contractor or subcontractor for many different
government programs. U.S. government defense contracts typically involve long
lead times for design and development, and are subject to significant changes
in contract scheduling. Congress generally appropriates funds on a fiscal year
basis even though a program may continue for several years. Consequently,
programs are often only partially funded initially, and additional funds are
committed only as Congress makes further appropriations. The termination or
reduction of funding for a government program would result in a loss of
anticipated future revenues attributable to that program.
The companys U.S. government business is performed under both
cost-reimbursement (sometimes referred to as cost-type) and fixed-price
contracts. Contracts for research, engineering, prototypes, repair and
maintenance are often cost-reimbursement arrangements, under which the customer
reimburses the company for allowable costs and pays a predetermined fee. A
large percentage of the companys production contracts are fixed-price
arrangements, pursuant to which the company agrees to perform a specific scope
of work for a fixed amount. For the year ended December 31, 2001, cost-type
and fixed-price contracts accounted for approximately 42 percent and 58
percent, respectively, of the companys defense business.
Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price contracts present their own advantages
and disadvantages for the company. Cost-type arrangements generally involve
lower risk for the company, and sometimes involve fee schedules that allow the
company to obtain increased payments for satisfying certain performance
criteria. However, not all of the companys costs are recoverable under these
types of contracts, and the government typically has the right to object to the
companys costs as not allowable or unreasonable, which can increase the
companys risk. Fixed-price arrangements generally provide the company with
greater profit potential if it can complete the work for less than the contract
amount. However, fixed-price contracts also expose the company to increased
risk of potential cost overruns.
U.S. COMMERCIAL
Commercial sales (in millions) to domestic customers were $3,664, $3,209
and $2,790 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The majority of the companys
commercial sales were for Gulfstream aircraft to national and multinational
corporations. The aircraft are operated by customers in a wide spectrum of
industries and customer groups including: pharmaceuticals, consumer goods, high
technology, energy, industrial manufacturing, finance, insurance, real estate,
mining, transportation, communications, public utilities and the retail trade,
as well as individuals.
7
The company has an agreement with an unaffiliated customer who purchases
aircraft from the company for use in its fractional ownership program,
Executive Jet International (Executive Jet), a unit of Berkshire Hathaway and
the leader in the fractional market. Sales to Executive Jet were approximately
nine percent of Aerospace sales in both 2001 and 2000 and approximately eight
percent of Aerospace sales in 1999.
INTERNATIONAL
Direct international sales (in millions) to both defense and commercial
customers were $1,180, $967 and $966 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
These sales represented approximately ten percent of the companys consolidated
net sales in each of the past three years. International defense sales were
derived primarily from the companys international operations; international
commercial sales were related primarily to the export of business aircraft.
The company owns operations located in Canada, the U.K. and Spain. For the
year ended December 31, 2001, sales and operating earnings from international
operations were three percent and one percent of consolidated sales and
operating earnings, respectively. Identifiable assets of operations domiciled
outside the U.S. were seven percent, four percent and six percent of total
identifiable assets at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. At
December 31, 2001, these assets consisted primarily of cash and intangible
assets, including goodwill.
For information regarding sales by geographic region, see Note S to the
Consolidated Financial Statements on page 46 of the 2001 Annual Report, filed
as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
Supplies
The company is dependent upon suppliers and subcontractors for raw
materials and a large number of components used in the production of its
products. Fuel or material shortages could adversely impact the companys
suppliers, thus impairing their ability to honor their contractual commitments
with the company. Although, in some cases, the company is dependent on one or
a few sources, the company has not experienced difficulty in obtaining the
resources necessary for its business operations.
Research and Development
The companys defense and business aviation operations conduct independent
research and development activities, which include bid and proposal work. The
companys defense businesses conduct research and development activities under
U.S. government contracts. These research efforts have been and continue to be
concerned with developing products for large systems development programs and
performing work under research and development technology contracts.
Research and development activities of the companys defense businesses
represented the majority of company-sponsored expenditures in each of the past
three years. A significant portion of these expenditures is recovered through
overhead charges pursuant to U.S. government contracts. Research and
development activities of the Aerospace group are internally funded product
enhancement and product development programs for Gulfstream aircraft.
Research and development expenditures (in millions) were as follows:
8
Backlog
Summary backlog information (in millions) for each business group is as
follows:
For further discussion of backlog, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition on pages 15
through 27 of the 2001 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference.
DEFENSE BUSINESSES
Total backlog represents the estimated remaining sales value of work to be
performed under firm contracts. Funded backlog for government programs
represents the portion of total backlog that has been appropriated by Congress
and funded by the procuring agency. To the extent backlog has not been funded,
there is no assurance that congressional appropriations or agency allotments
will be forthcoming.
AEROSPACE
Aerospace funded backlog represents orders for which the company has
entered into definitive purchase contracts and has received non-refundable
deposits from the customers. Unfunded aircraft backlog includes options to
purchase new aircraft and agreements to provide future aircraft maintenance and
support services.
Forty-eight percent of Aerospace funded backlog is with commercial
customers other than Executive Jet. Backlog with Executive Jet represents 43
percent of Aerospace funded backlog. The remaining nine percent of Aerospace
funded backlog is with government customers. Executive Jet represents the
majority of Aerospace unfunded backlog. Following UAL Corporations
announcement on March 22, 2002 that it was closing its Avolar subsidiary,
which was to engage in a fractional ownership program, the company terminated
its agreements with Avolar, which previously represented $2.5 billion of total
backlog. Prior to the termination of the Avolar agreements, contracts with
Avolar represented approximately $800 million of firm contracts backlog for 36
aircraft. The company believes that it will be able to re-market the aircraft
previously under contract to Avolar.
Regulatory Matters
U.S. GOVERNMENT DEFENSE CONTRACTS
In 2001, 60 percent of the companys net sales were to the U.S.
government, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor. Generally,
government contracts are subject to oversight audits by government
representatives and contain provisions permitting termination, in whole or in
part, at the governments convenience or for default. If a contract is
terminated at the convenience of the U.S. government, a contractor is entitled
to receive payments for its allowable costs and, in general, the proportionate
share of fees or earnings for the work done. Contracts which are terminated for
default generally provide that the government only pays for the work it has
accepted and may require the contractor to pay for the incremental cost of
reprocurement and may hold the contractor liable for damages. Since the
majority of the companys revenues are dependent on the procurement,
performance and payment under the companys U.S. government contracts, the
termination of one or more critical government contracts could have a negative
impact on the companys results of operations and financial condition.
9
The companys government businesses are also subject to specific
procurement regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations and
requirements could lead to suspension or debarment, for cause, from government
contracting or subcontracting for a period of time.
BUSINESS AIRCRAFT
The Aerospace group is subject to regulation by the Federal Aviation
Administration in the U.S. and other similar aviation regulatory authorities
throughout the world. For an aircraft to be manufactured and sold, the model
must have received a Type Certificate from the appropriate aviation authority,
and each individual aircraft must have also received a Certificate of
Airworthiness. Maintenance facilities are also required to be licensed by
aviation authorities. Aviation authorities have the power to require changes
to aircraft if deemed necessary for safety purposes.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The companys operations are subject to and affected by a variety of
federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations relating
to the discharge, treatment, storage, disposal, investigation and remediation
of certain materials, substances and wastes. The company continually assesses
its compliance status and management of other environmental matters. The
company believes that its operations are in substantial compliance with all
applicable environmental laws and regulations.
Operating and maintenance costs associated with environmental compliance
and management of contaminated sites are a normal, recurring part of the
companys operations. These costs are not significant relative to total
operating costs or cash flows and often are allowable costs under the companys
contracts with the U.S. government. These costs have not been material in the
past and, based on information presently available to the company and on U.S.
government policies relating to allowable costs in effect at this time, all of
which are subject to change, the company does not expect continued compliance
to have a material impact on the companys results of operations or financial
condition.
Under existing U.S. environmental laws, Potentially Responsible Parties
(PRP) are jointly and severally liable, and therefore the company is
potentially liable to the government or third parties for the full cost of
remediating contamination at the companys facilities or former facilities or
at third-party sites where the company has been designated a PRP by the EPA or
a state environmental agency. In the unlikely event that the company is
required to fully fund the remediation of a site, the statutory framework would
allow the company to pursue rights to contribution from other PRPs. Additional
information relating to the impact of environmental controls is included in
Item 3, Legal Proceedings Environmental on page 17 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Intellectual Property
The company is an established leader in the development of innovative
products, manufacturing technologies and systems integration practices. In
addition to owning a large portfolio of proprietary intellectual property, the
company also licenses certain intellectual property rights of third parties,
including the U.S. government. Additionally, in many cases, the U.S.
government licenses the companys patents, pursuant to which the government may
use or authorize others to use the inventions covered by the patents. Although
these intellectual property rights are important to the operation of the
companys business, no existing patent, license or other intellectual property
right is of such importance that its loss or termination would, in the opinion
of management, have a material impact on the companys business.
Employees
As of December 31, 2001, the company had approximately 51,700 employees,
of whom 32 percent were covered by collective bargaining agreements with
various unions, the most significant of which are the International Association
of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the Marine Draftsmens Association, the
Metal Trades Council of New London, Connecticut, and the United Auto Workers
Union. Agreements covering approximately three percent of total employees are
due to expire during 2002.
10
Executive Officers Of The Registrant
All executive officers of the company are elected annually. No executive
officer of the company was selected pursuant to any arrangement or
understanding between the officer and any other person. The name, age, offices
and positions held for the last five years of the companys executive officers
as of March 7, 2002 were as follows:
11
12
13
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Principal Business Groups.
A summary of floor space (square feet in
millions) at the main facilities of the Information Systems and Technology,
Combat Systems, Marine Systems and Aerospace business groups follows:
14
15
Other Properties.
Freeman Energy operates two underground coal mines and one
surface coal mine in Illinois. Coal preparation facilities and rail loading
facilities are located at each mine sufficient for its output. Material
Service operates several stone quarries, as well as sand and gravel pits and
yards in the Chicago, Illinois and Indiana areas for its aggregates business.
The company owns approximately 260 acres of property in Rancho Cucamonga,
California, of which approximately 93 acres is undeveloped.
General.
The company believes that its main facilities are adequate for
the present needs of the company and its subsidiaries and, as supplemented by
planned improvements and construction, are expected to remain adequate for the
foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The company is subject to litigation and other legal proceedings arising
out of the ordinary course of its business or arising under provisions relating
to the protection of the environment.
The company is primarily engaged in providing products and services under
contracts with the U.S. government and, to a lesser degree, under direct
foreign sales contracts, some of which are funded by the U.S. government.
These contracts are subject to extensive legal and regulatory requirements and,
from time to time, agencies of the U.S. government investigate whether the
companys operations are being conducted in accordance with these requirements.
The company does not believe that the outcome of any such government
investigations will have a material impact on the companys results of
operations or financial condition.
Termination of A-12 Program
In January 1991, the Navy terminated the companys A-12 aircraft contract
for default. The A-12 contract was a fixed-price incentive contract for the
full-scale development and initial production of the Navys new carrier-based
Advanced Tactical Aircraft. Both the company and McDonnell Douglas, now owned
by the Boeing Company, (the contractors) were parties to the contract with the
Navy, each had full responsibility to the Navy for performance under the
contract, and both are jointly and severally liable for potential liabilities
arising from the termination. As a consequence of the termination for default,
the Navy demanded that the contractors repay $1,352 million in unliquidated
progress payments, but agreed to defer collection of the amount pending a
decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on the contractors challenge to
the termination for default, or a negotiated settlement.
The contractors filed a complaint on June 7, 1991, in the U.S. Court of
Federal Claims contesting the default termination. In December 1994, the court
issued an order vacating the termination for default. On December 19, 1995,
following further proceedings, the court issued an order converting the
termination for default to a termination for convenience. On March 31, 1998, a
final judgment was entered in favor of the contractors for $1.2 billion plus
interest.
On July 1, 1999, the Court of Appeals found that the Trial Court erred in
converting the termination for default to a termination for convenience without
first determining whether a default existed. The Court of Appeals remanded the
case for determination of whether the governments default termination was
justified. On August 31, 2001, following the trial on remand, the Trial Court
issued an opinion upholding the default termination of the A-12 contract. In
its opinion, the Trial Court rejected all of the governments arguments to
sustain the default termination except for one, schedule. With respect to the
governments schedule arguments, the Trial Court held that the schedule the
government unilaterally imposed was reasonable and enforceable, and that the
government had not waived that schedule. On the sole ground that the
contractors were not going to deliver the first aircraft on the date provided
in the unilateral schedule, the Trial Court upheld the default termination and
entered judgment for the government.
The contractors filed post-trial motions seeking reconsideration by the
Trial Court of its opinion and judgment. On October 4, 2001, the Trial Court
denied the contractors post-trial motions. On November 30, 2001, the company
filed its notice of appeal.
16
The company continues to believe strongly in the merits of its case. The
company believes that in concluding to the contrary on remand, the Trial Court
applied incorrect legal standards and otherwise erred as a matter of law. The
company believes that it has substantial arguments on appeal to persuade the
Court of Appeals to reverse the Trial Courts judgment. The contractors have
asked the Navy to confirm the deferral of payment through the pendency of the
appeal. The contractors and the Navy have not yet reached an agreement with
respect to this request.
If, contrary to the companys expectations, the default termination is
sustained on appeal, the contractors could be required to repay the government
as much as $1,352 million for progress payments received for the A-12 contract
plus interest (approximately $970 million at December 31, 2001). In this
outcome, the government contends the companys liability would be approximately
$1.2 billion pretax, $625 million after-tax to be taken as a charge against
discontinued operations. The company has sufficient resources to pay such an
obligation if required.
False Claims Act
On May 7, 1999, a whistleblower suit was filed under seal against the
company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South
Carolina. The plaintiff alleges that the company violated the False Claims Act
by omitting certain facts when it testified before Congress in 1995 concerning
funding for the third
Seawolf-
attack submarine. The plaintiff seeks damages in
the amount of the contract award for the third
Seawolf
, subject to trebling
under the False Claims Act. The Department of Justice declined to intervene in
the case on the plaintiffs behalf and the suit was unsealed in December 2000.
The complaint has been removed to the United States District Court for the
District of South Carolina.
The Court has directed discovery on the issue of whether the alleged
omissions by the company were material to the governments decision to award
the third
Seawolf
to the company. The parties filed motions on this issue on
March 15, 2002. The company believes that it has substantial legal and factual
arguments that will result in either the dismissal of the case or a judgment in
the companys favor.
Environmental
The companys operations are subject to and affected by a variety of
federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. The
company is directly or indirectly involved in environmental responses at some
of the companys facilities and former facilities, and at third-party sites not
owned by the company but where the company has been designated a PRP by the EPA
or a state environmental agency. The company is also involved in the
investigation, cleanup and remediation of various conditions at sites it
currently owns and operates or formerly owned or operated where the release of
hazardous materials may have occurred. Based on historical experience, the
company expects that a significant percentage of the total remediation and
compliance costs associated with the companys facilities or former facilities
will continue to be allowable costs, and therefore reimbursed by the U.S.
government. Based on a site by site analysis, the company believes it has
adequate accruals for any liability it may incur arising from such sites at
which there is a known environmental condition, or Superfund or other
multi-party sites at which the company is a PRP.
Other
Various claims and other legal proceedings generally incidental to the
normal course of business are pending or threatened against the company. While
the company cannot predict the outcome of these matters, the company believes
its potential liabilities in these proceedings, individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material impact on the companys results of
operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the companys security holders
during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2001.
17
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
1,169
$
783
$
929
1,041
490
361
$
2,210
$
1,273
$
1,290
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
1,964
$
1,831
$
1,460
Surface combatants
940
930
1,021
708
652
607
$
3,612
$
3,413
$
3,088
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
2,694
$
2,353
$
2,251
571
676
658
$
3,265
$
3,029
$
2,909
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
7,138
$
6,056
$
5,104
181
124
99
$
7,319
$
6,180
$
5,203
60%
60%
58%
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
203
$
143
$
103
83
87
116
$
286
$
230
$
219
December 31
2001 Total
2001
2000
Backlog Not
Expected to Be
Funded
Unfunded
Total
Funded
Unfunded
Total
Filled in 2002
$
4,745
$
226
$
4,971
$
1,845
$
97
$
1,942
$
2,860
3,434
1,760
5,194
1,597
176
1,773
2,610
6,702
3,358
10,060
7,247
3,964
11,211
7,588
4,198
2,075
6,273
3,336
1,034
4,370
3,645
305
29
334
417
29
446
211
$
19,384
$
7,448
$
26,832
$
14,442
$
5,300
$
19,742
$
16,914
Name, Position and Office
Age
David D. Baier Vice President Taxes since August 1995
47
G. Kent Bankus Vice President Government Relations since April 1993
59
W. W. Boisture, Jr. Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Aerospace since July 1999;
President and Chief
Operating
Officer, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation since December 1998;
Executive Vice President, Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation February 1994 December 1998
57
Allan C. Cameron Vice President of the company and President of Bath Iron Works since
March 1996
56
Nicholas D. Chabraja Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company and Chief Executive Officer
since
June 1997; Vice Chairman December 1996 May 1997
59
Michael E. Chandler Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics Network
Systems since
August 2001; Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics
Worldwide Telecommunication Systems
February 2000 August 2001; President of General Dynamics
Worldwide Telecommunication Systems September 1999
February 2000; Vice President and
General Manager, GTE Government Systems Worldwide Telecommunication
Systems Division
November 1997 September 1999; Vice President and General Manager, GTE Government
Systems
Electronic Systems Division October 1995 November 1997
57
Kenneth C. Dahlberg Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Information Systems and
Technology since
March 2001; Executive Vice President for Business Development and President,
Raytheon International January 2000
March 2001; President and Chief Operating Officer,
Raytheon Systems Company December 1997 December 1999;
President, Weapons Systems Segment,
Hughes Aircraft Company September 1994 December 1997
57
Gerard J. DeMuro Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics C4 Systems since
August 2001;
Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics Communication
Systems February 2000
August 2001; President of General Dynamics Communication Systems
September 1999 February 2000; Vice President and
General Manager, GTE Government
Systems Communication Systems Division October 1997 September 1999;
Vice President and
General Manager MSE/TRITAC GTE Government SystemsCommunication Systems
Division
October 1994 October 1997
46
Larry R. Flynn Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics Aviation Services
since October 2001;
President, General Dynamics Aviation Services and Senior Vice President of Aircraft Services at
Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation February 2001 October 2001;
Senior Vice President of Aircraft Services at Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation
December 1998 February 2001;
Vice President, Service and Product Support at Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation
June 1995 December 1998
50
David H. Fogg Vice President and Treasurer since March 1998; Staff Vice President and Treasurer
November 1994 March 1998
46
Mark A. Fried Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics Decision Systems
since
October 2001; Vice President and General Manager of the Integrated Information Systems
Group division of Motorola, Inc.
January 1997 October 2001
55
Company
Government
Owned
Leased
Owned
Facilities
Facilities
Facilities
Total
Pittsfield, MA (Labs)
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
General Dynamics C4 Systems
0.1
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
General Dynamics Decision Systems
1.5
1.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.8
1.7
1.0
5.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
1.6
1.6
1.0
0.1
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Company
Government
Owned
Leased
Owned
Facilities
Facilities
Facilities
Total
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
3.1
2.3
6.4
11.8
1.1
1.1
2.8
0.1
2.9
0.4
1.1
1.5
0.2
6.0
6.2
4.5
7.2
0.0
11.7
1.4
0.1
1.5
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.1
1.6
0.0
3.7
*
In February 2002, the company announced that it expects to close its
Oklahoma City, OK facility before year-end 2002.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANYS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
The companys common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange,
Chicago Stock Exchange and Pacific Stock Exchange.
On October 25, 1999, the company issued 15,424 shares of common stock to
James D. Caldwell in connection with the companys acquisition of Caldwells
Diving Company, Inc. and Cable Ventures Inc. (now known as it International
Telecom USA, Inc.). In connection with this share issuance, the company
claimed exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, based on the fact that the transaction did not involve any
public offering of securities.
The high and low sales prices of the companys common stock and the cash
dividends declared with respect to the companys common stock for each
quarterly period during the two most recent fiscal years are included in Note T
to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on page 47 of the 2001
Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
There were approximately 17,900 holders of record of the companys common
stock at March 7, 2002.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The Selected Financial Data appearing on page 52 of the 2001 Annual
Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference in response to
this item.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Results of Operations and
Financial Condition appearing on pages 15 through 27 of the 2001 Annual
Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference in response to
this item.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information appearing under the caption Market Risk on page 27 of
the 2001 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference in
response to this item.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements and Report of Independent Public Accountants appearing on pages 28
through 51 of the 2001 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, are incorporated herein by
reference in response to this item.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
None.
18
MATTERS
OPERATIONS
DISCLOSURE
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required to be set forth herein, except for a list of the
executive officers that is provided in Part I of this report, is included in
the sections entitled Re-Election of the Board of Directors of the Company
and Other Information Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in the companys definitive proxy statement for its 2002 annual
shareholders meeting (the Proxy Statement), which sections are incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required to be set forth herein is included in the section
entitled Executive Compensation in the companys Proxy Statement, which
section is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required to be set forth herein is included in the
sections entitled Security Ownership of Management and Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners in the companys Proxy Statement, which sections are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required to be set forth herein is included in the
sections entitled Re-Election of the Board of Directors of the Company
Transactions Involving Directors and the Company and Certain Transactions in
the companys Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by
reference.
19
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The Report of Independent Public Accountants and Consolidated Financial
Statements appearing in the 2001 Annual Report on the pages listed in the
following index are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, as Exhibit 13, and are incorporated herein by
reference.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
No schedules are submitted because they are either not applicable or not
required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
3. ExhibitsSee Index on pages 22 and 23 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
On October 1, 2001, the company reported to the Securities and Exchange
Commission under Item 5, Other Events, that the company completed its
acquisition of Motorola, Inc.s Integrated Information Systems Group, renamed
General Dynamics Decision Systems, for $825 million in cash.
20
(a)
1. Financial Statements
Page of
2001
Annual
Report
51
28
29
30
31
32 - 50
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
March 29, 2002
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this report has been signed below on March 29, 2002, by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, including
a majority of the directors.
21
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
By: /s/ John W. Schwartz
John W. Schwartz
Vice President and Controller
*
By David A. Savner pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed by the directors
listed above, which Power of Attorney has been filed as an exhibit hereto and
incorporated herein by reference thereto.
/s/ David A. Savner
David A. Savner
Secretary
INDEX TO EXHIBITS GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
Exhibits listed below, which have been filed with the Commission pursuant to
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and which were filed as noted below, are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of this report with the same effect as if filed
herewith.
22
INDEX TO EXHIBITS GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
Exhibit
Number
Description
2.1
Asset Purchase Agreement between Motorola, Inc. and General Dynamics
Corporation, dated August 6, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference from
the companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2001, and filed with the Commission November 13, 2001)
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, effective August 2, 1999
(incorporated herein by reference from the companys current report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission August 11, 1999)
3.2
Restated By-Laws, effective March 7, 2001 (incorporated herein by
reference from the companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, and filed with the Commission March 29, 2001)
4.1
Indenture dated as of August 27, 2001 among General Dynamics Corporation,
the Guarantors (as defined therein) and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference from the companys registration
statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-77024) filed with the Commission January
18, 2002)
4.2
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 27, 2001 among General
Dynamics Corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein) and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-77024) filed with the
Commission January 18, 2002)
4.3
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 22, 2001 among General
Dynamics Corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Bear Stearns
& Co. Inc. (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-77024) filed with the
Commission January 18, 2002)
10.1*
Employment Agreement between the company and Nicholas D. Chabraja dated
November 12, 1996 (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, and filed
with the Commission March 21, 1997)
10.2*
Consulting Agreement between the company and Paul G. Kaminski dated
August 18, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and filed
with the Commission March 18, 1998)
10.3*
Retirement Benefit Agreement between the company and David A. Savner
dated March 4, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and filed
with the Commission March 18, 1999)
10.4*
Retirement Benefit Agreement between the company and Michael J. Mancuso
dated March 6, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and filed
with the Commission March 18, 1998)
10.5*
Successor Retirement Plan for Directors**
10.6*
General Dynamics Corporation Non-Employee Directors 1999 Stock Plan**
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-3671
Exhibit
Number
Description
10.7
Agreement and Plan of Merger between General Dynamics Corporation, Mars
Acquisition Corporation and Primex Technologies, Inc. dated November 9,
2000 (incorporated herein by reference from the companys quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2000, and filed
with the Commission November 13, 2000)
10.8*
General Dynamics Corporation Supplemental Savings and Stock Investment
Plan (incorporated herein by reference from the companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and filed with the
Commission March 29, 2001)
10.9*
General Dynamics Corporation 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated (incorporated herein by reference from the companys
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2001,
and filed with the Commission August 14, 2001)
10.10*
Form of Severance Protection Agreement entered into by substantially all
executive officers**
10.11*
Employment Agreement between the company and Kenneth C. Dahlberg dated February 13, 2001**
10.12*
Retirement Benefit Agreement between the company and W. William Boisture, Jr. dated May 16, 2001**
13
2001 Annual Report (pages 15 through 52)**
21
Subsidiaries**
23
Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP**
24
Power of Attorney of the Board of Directors**
99.1
Letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding Arthur
Andersen LLP representations to the company**
99.2
1999 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the General Dynamics Corporation
Savings and Stock Investment Plan (incorporated herein by reference from
the companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
1999, and filed with the Commission June 28, 2000)
99.3
1999 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the General Dynamics Corporation
Hourly Employees Savings and Stock Investment Plan (incorporated herein
by reference from the companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 1999, and filed with the Commission June 28, 2000)
99.4
2000 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the General Dynamics Corporation
Savings and Stock Investment Plan (incorporated herein by reference from
the companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2000, and filed with the Commission June 29, 2001)
99.5
2000 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the General Dynamics Corporation
Hourly Employees Savings and Stock Investment Plan (incorporated herein
by reference from the companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2000, and filed with the Commission June 29, 2001)
*
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed pursuant to Item 14(c) of Form 10-K.
**
Filed herewith
23
Exhibit 10.5
SUCCESSOR RETIREMENT PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
WHEREAS, General Dynamics Corporation (the Corporation) maintained a retirement plan for certain non-employee members of its Board of Directors (the Directors Retirement Plan);
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the Board) terminated the Directors Retirement Plan effective December 1, 1999;
NOW, THEREFORE, notwithstanding any provisions of the Directors Retirement Plan to the contrary, effective December 1, 1999, the following provisions shall govern the unpaid accrued benefits under the Directors Retirement Plan.
1. The value of the unpaid accrued benefits under the Directors Retirement Plan shall be deferred and paid under this Successor Retirement Plan (the Plan) according to the provisions described below.
2. As of December 1, 1999, each director listed on Schedule A attached hereto (each an eligible director) shall be given an irrevocable option to convert the entire actuarial lump sum value (as determined below) of such eligible directors vested benefit in the Directors Retirement Plan into either (a) a deemed cash account or (b) a number of phantom shares of the Corporations common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Common Stock) determined by dividing the actuarial lump sum value determined below by the average of the high and low market price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 1, 1999. Such deemed amount of cash or phantom shares shall be credited to a Plan account established and maintained for each eligible director. The account shall not require segregation of any Corporation assets and shall at all times remain subject to the claims of the Corporations general creditors.
The actuarial lump sum value shall be determined as of December 1, 1999, which value shall assume the benefit is payable for life and that the eligible director would have retired at age 75 and began receiving annual payments guaranteed for the longer of ten years or the number of completed years of service as an outside director as of December 31, 1999, and based on the 1984 Unisex Pension Table with a one year setback and a discount rate of 7% per annum compound.
3. From December 1, 1999 until retirement, (a) amounts converted into the deemed cash account shall be credited with interest at prime rate (as set by The Northern Trust Company of Chicago, or its successor) on the last day of each calendar quarter and (b) amounts converted into phantom shares shall be adjusted upward or downward based on the value of Common Stock and shall be credited with stock dividend equivalents when the Corporation issues dividends on Common Stock.
4. Any dividend equivalents credited to an eligible directors account shall be reinvested in phantom shares of the Common Stock based on the average of the high and low market price of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the payment date of the dividend with respect to which such dividend equivalents are credited.
1
5. Benefits under the Plan are payable upon retirement as provided in this Section. As of the eligible directors retirement or death (if sooner), the Corporation shall determine the value of the eligible directors account. If the eligible director had elected a deemed cash account, the value of such account shall be based on the method described in Section 3. If the eligible director had elected to take phantom shares, the eligible directors account shall be valued as of the eligible directors retirement date based on the average of the high and low market price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange as of that date. Prior to retirement (or such other period as the Board may, in its discretion, determine) an eligible director shall make an election in writing to receive the value of the eligible directors account as determined above in either: (a) ten (10) installments with the first installment to be paid as soon as practical following the eligible directors retirement date and the additional nine (9) installments to be paid annually on or about the eligible directors anniversary of retirement, or (b) a lump sum payment which shall be paid within ten (10) business days of the directors retirement. Any such election may be changed or revoked at any time prior to the eligible directors retirement date shall be given effect (or such other period of time as the Board may, in its discretion, determine). If no election is made or if the election is determined to be invalid, payment shall be in such form as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. Payments under the Plan shall be in cash. If an eligible director elects to receive his account in annual installments, during the period he receives such annual installments his account shall be credited with interest at prime rate (as set by The Northern Trust Company of Chicago, or its successor) which interest shall be paid in full with the next installment payment.
6. No eligible director shall be entitled to any voting rights with respect to the phantom stock in the eligible directors account. The phantom stock under the Plan does not have any of the rights of the Common Stock other than to receive dividend equivalents. In the event of any change in the outstanding shares of the Common Stock by reason of a stock split, dividend, combination or similar transaction, the phantom stock shall be automatically proportionally adjusted in an equitable manner.
7. All eligible director accounts are subject to the general creditors of the Corporation and are unfunded promises to pay amounts in the future. Such eligible director accounts may not be assigned nor alienated.
8. In the event of the death of an eligible director, any unpaid amounts in the eligible directors account shall be paid to the eligible directors designated beneficiary. If no beneficiary is designated, such amounts shall be paid to the eligible directors estate. Amounts paid to a designated beneficiary or to an estate shall be in a lump sum.
9. The Board shall have complete power and authority to amend and terminate the Plan. The Board shall have complete power and authority to interpret and administer the Plan, to adopt, amend and rescind rules and regulations, and to establish terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, for the administration and implementation of the Plan, provided, however, that the Board may not make any changes that would adversely affect the rights of an eligible director who retired prior to the date of the change without the consent of such director. No benefits shall be payable from this Plan if the Board determines in its sole discretion that a director is not entitled to such benefits.
2
Schedule A
Julius W. Becton, Jr.
James S. Crown
Charles H. Goodman
George A. Joulwan
Paul G. Kaminski
Carl E. Mundy, Jr.
Carlisle A. H. Trost
3
EXHIBIT 10.6
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 1999 STOCK PLAN
1. | Purpose. The purpose of the General Dynamics Corporation Non-Employee Directors 1999 Stock Plan (the Plan) is to provide General Dynamics Corporation (the Company) with an effective means of attracting, retaining, and motivating directors of the Company. | |
2. | Eligibility. Any member of the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) who is not an employee of the Company (an Eligible Director) is eligible to participate in the Plan. | |
3. | Administration. The Plan shall be administered by the Board. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, the Board shall have full power and authority to interpret and administer the Plan, to determine the Eligible Directors to receive awards and the amounts, types and terms of the awards, to adopt, amend, and rescind rules and regulations, and to establish terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, for the administration and implementation of the Plan, provided, however, that the Board may not, after the date of any award, make any changes that would adversely affect the rights of a recipient under such award without the consent of the recipient. The determination of the Board on all matters shall be final and conclusive and binding on the Company and all participants. | |
4. | Awards. Awards may be made by the Board in such amounts as it shall determine in cash, in the Companys common stock, par value $1.00 per share (Common Stock), in options to purchase Common Stock of the Corporation (Stock Options), or in shares of Common Stock subject to certain restrictions (Restricted Stock), or any combination thereof. Further, an Eligible Directors annual retainer may also be paid under the Plan in either cash or Common Stock or in a fifty percent (50%) and fifty percent (50%) combination thereof, as the Eligible Director may elect. There shall be 40,000 shares of Common Stock available for issuance in connection with awards under the Plan. If any award under the Plan shall expire, terminate, or be canceled for any reason without having been vested or exercised in full, the corresponding number of shares which were reserved for issuance in connection therewith shall again be available for the purposes of the Plan. Shares available under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or may be treasury shares. | |
5. | Common Stock. In the case of awards or payments of retainers in Common Stock, the number of shares shall be determined by dividing the amount of the award or retainer elected to be received in Common Stock by the average of the highest and lowest quoted selling prices of the Companys Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the award or retainer. The average is referred to throughout this Plan as the fair market value. |
Page: 1 of 6
6. | Dividend Equivalents and Interest. |
a. | Dividends. If any award in Common Stock or Restricted Stock is to be paid on a deferred basis, the recipient may be entitled, on terms and conditions to be established by the Board, to receive a payment of, or credit equivalent to, any dividend payable with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock which, as of the record date for the dividend, has been awarded or made payable to the recipient but not delivered. | ||
b. | Interest. If any award in cash is to be paid on a deferred basis, the recipient may be entitled, on terms and conditions to be established by the Board, to accrue interest on the unpaid amount. |
7. | Restricted Stock Awards. |
a. | General. Restricted Stock represents awards made in Common Stock in which the shares granted may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated except upon passage of time, or upon satisfaction of other conditions, or both, in every case as provided by the Board. The recipient of an award of Restricted Stock shall be entitled to vote the shares awarded and to the payment of dividends on the shares from the date the award of shares is made; and, in addition, all Special Distributions (as defined in Section 9 hereof) thereon shall be credited to an account similar to the Account described in Section 9. The recipient of an award of Restricted Stock shall have a nonforfeitable interest in amounts credited to such account in proportion to the lapse of restrictions on the Restricted Stock to which such amounts relate. For example, when restrictions lapse on fifty percent (50%) of the Restricted Stock granted in an award, the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have a nonforfeitable interest in fifty percent (50%) of the amount credited to his account which is attributable to such Restricted Stock. The holder of Restricted Stock shall receive a payment in cash of any amount in his account as soon as practicable after the lapse of restrictions relating thereto. | ||
b. | Restricted Stock Performance Formula. Awards of Restricted Stock may be granted pursuant to the formula described in this Section, referred to herein as the Restricted Stock Performance Formula. The Board shall make an initial grant of shares of Restricted Stock (the Initial Grant). At the end of a specified performance period (determined by the Board), the number of shares in the Initial Grant shall be increased or decreased, based on the increase or decrease in the fair market value of a share of Common Stock during the performance period, by a number of shares equal to (a) the excess of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the last day of the performance period over the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the grant date multiplied by (b) the number of shares of Restricted Stock subject to the Initial Grant and divided by (c) the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the last day of the performance period. The number of shares of Common Stock so determined is added to (in the case of a higher fair market value) or subtracted from (in the case of a lower fair market value) the number of shares of Restricted Stock to be earned at that time. Once the number of shares of Restricted Stock has been adjusted, restrictions will continue to be imposed for a period of time determined by the Board. |
8. | Stock Option Awards. |
a. | Type of Options . Options shall be in the form of options which do not qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. |
Page: 2 of 6
b. | Purchase Price. The purchase price of the Common Stock under each option shall be determined by the Board, but shall not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of the award of the option. | ||
c. | Terms and Conditions . The Board shall establish (i) the term of each option, (ii) the terms and conditions upon which and the times when each option shall be exercised, and (iii) the terms and conditions under which options may be exercised after termination as an Eligible Director for any reason for periods not to exceed three years after such termination. | ||
d. | Purchase by Cash or Stock . The purchase price of shares purchased upon the exercise of any stock option shall be paid (i) in full in cash, or (ii) in whole or in part (in combination with cash) in full shares of Common Stock owned by the optionee and valued at fair market value on the date of exercise, all pursuant to procedures approved by the Board. | ||
e. | Transferability . Options shall not be transferable other than by will or pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution. During the lifetime of the person to whom an option has been awarded, it may be exercisable only by such person or one acting in his stead or in a representative capacity. Upon or after the death of the person to whom an option is awarded, an option may be exercised by the optionees legatee or legatees under his last will, or by the option holders personal representative or distributees executive, administrator, or personal representative or designee in accordance with the terms of the option. |
9. | Adjustments for Special Distributions. The Board shall have the authority to change all Stock Options granted under this Plan to adjust equitably the purchase price thereof and the number and kind of shares or other property subject thereto to reflect a special distribution to shareholders or other extraordinary corporate action involving distributions or payments to shareholders (collectively referred to as Special Distributions). In the event of any Special Distribution, the Board may cause to be created a Special Distribution account (the Account) in the name of the individual to whom Stock Options have been granted hereunder (sometimes herein referred to as a Grantee) to which shall be credited an amount determined by the Board, or, in the case of non-cash Special Distributions, make appropriate comparable adjustments for, or payments to or for the benefit of, the Grantee. | |
Amounts credited to the Account in accordance with the preceding rules shall be credited with interest, accrued monthly, at an annual rate equal to the higher of Moodys Corporate Bond Yield Average or the prime rate in effect from time to time, and such interest shall be credited in accordance with rules to be established by the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at no time shall the Board permit the amount credited to the Grantees Account to exceed 90 percent of the purchase price of the Grantees outstanding Stock Options to which such amount relates. To the extent that any credit would cause the Account to exceed that limitation, such excess shall be distributed to the Grantee in cash. | ||
Amounts credited to the Grantees Account shall be paid to the Grantee or, if the Grantee is deceased, his or her beneficiary at the time that the options to which it relates are exercised or expire, whichever occurs first. |
Page: 3 of 6
The Account shall for all purposes be deemed to be an unfunded promise to pay money in the future in certain specified circumstances. As to amounts credited to the Account, a Grantee shall have no rights greater than the rights of a general unsecured creditor of the Company, and amounts credited to the Grantees Account shall not be assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and such amounts shall not be subject to the claims of the Grantees creditors. | ||
10. | Adjustments and Reorganizations. The Board may make such adjustments to awards granted under the Plan (including the terms, exercise price, and otherwise) as it deems appropriate in the event of changes that impact the Company, the Companys share price, or share status. | |
In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, change of control, recapitalization, separation, liquidation, stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary dividend, spin-off, split-up, rights offering, share combination, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the Common Stock, the number and kind of shares that may be delivered under the Plan shall be subject to such equitable adjustment as the Board may deem appropriate. Except as otherwise provided by the Board, all authorized shares, share limitations, and awards under the Plan shall be proportionately adjusted to account for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from any stock split, stock dividend, reverse stock split, or any similar reorganization or event. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, all awards outstanding hereunder shall become fully vested upon the occurrence of a change in control. | ||
In the preceding paragraph, change of control means any of the following events: |
a. | An acquisition (other than directly from the Company) of any voting securities of the Company by any Person (as used in Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and including any group as such term is used in such sections) who immediately after such acquisition is the Beneficial Owner (as used in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 40 percent or more of the combined voting power of the Companys then outstanding voting securities; provided that, in determining whether a change of control has occurred, voting securities which are acquired by (i) an employee benefit plan (or a trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, (ii) the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, (iii) any Person that, pursuant to Rule 13d-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act, is permitted to, and actually does, report its beneficial ownership of voting securities of the Company on Schedule 13G (or any successor Schedule) (a 13G Filer) provided that, if any 13G Filer subsequently becomes required to or does report its Beneficial Ownership of voting securities of the Company on Schedule 13D (or any successor Schedule) then such Person shall be deemed to have first acquired, on the first date on which such Person becomes required to or does so file, Beneficial Ownership of all voting securities of the Company Beneficially Owned by it on such date, or (iv) any person in connection with a Non-Control Transaction (as hereinafter defined), will not constitute an acquisition which results in a change of control | ||
b. | Consummation of: |
(i) | a merger, consolidation, or reorganization involving the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company, unless: |
Page: 4 of 6
(A) | the stockholders of the Company immediately before such merger, consolidation, or reorganization will own, directly or indirectly, immediately following such merger, consolidation, or reorganization, at least 50 percent of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the corporation resulting from such merger, consolidation, or reorganization (the Surviving Company) or any parent thereof in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the voting securities of the Company immediately before such merger, consolidation, or reorganization; and | ||
(B) | the individuals who were members of the Board immediately prior to the execution of the agreement providing for such merger, consolidation, or reorganization constitute a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Surviving Company or any parent thereof; and | ||
(C) | no person (other than the Company, any subsidiary of the Company, any employee benefit plan (or any trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company, any Schedule 13G Filer, the Surviving Company, any subsidiary or parent of the Surviving Company, or any person who, immediately prior to such merger, consolidation, or reorganization, was the Beneficial Owner of 40 percent or more of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company) is the Beneficial Owner of 40 percent or more of the combined voting power of the Surviving Companys then outstanding voting securities; | ||
(D) | a transaction described in clauses (A) through (C) above is referred to herein as a Non-Control Transaction; |
(ii) | the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or | ||
(iii) | a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (other than a sale or other disposition to an entity (A) of which at least 50 percent of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities are owned, directly or indirectly, by stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the voting securities of the Company, (B) a majority of whose board of directors is comprised of individuals who were members of the Board immediately prior to the execution of the agreement providing for such sale or other disposition and (C) of which no Person (other than the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, any employee benefit plan (or any trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company, any Schedule 13G Filer, the Surviving Corporation, any Subsidiary or parent of the Surviving Corporation, or any Person who, immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or reorganization, was the Beneficial Owner of 40 percent or more of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company) has Beneficial Ownership of 40 percent or more of the combined voting power of the entitys outstanding voting securities. |
c. | Individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (the Incumbent Board), cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the effective date of the Plan whose election, or nomination for election by Company stockholders, was approved by a vote of two-thirds of |
Page: 5 of 6
the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest (including, but not limited to, a consent solicitation). | |||
d. | Notwithstanding the foregoing, a change of control will not be deemed to occur solely because any person (a Subject Person) acquires beneficial ownership of more than the permitted amount of the outstanding voting securities of the Company as a result of the acquisition of voting securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of voting securities outstanding, increases the proportional number of shares beneficially owned by the Subject Person, provided that if a change of control would occur (but for the operation of this sentence) as a result of the acquisition of voting securities by the Company, and after such share acquisition by the Company, the Subject Person becomes the beneficial owner of any additional voting securities which increases the percentage of the then outstanding voting securities beneficially owned by the Subject Person, then a change of control will be deemed to have occurred. |
11. | Tax Withholding. In the event that federal, state or local tax laws provide withholding requirements that apply to Eligible Directors, the Company shall withhold amounts paid under the Plan as required by any such law. | |
12. | Expenses. The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company. | |
13. | Amendments. The Board shall have complete power and authority to amend the Plan, provided that the Board shall not amend the Plan in any manner that requires shareholder approval under applicable law without such approval No amendment to the Plan may, without the consent of the individual to whom the award shall theretofore have been awarded, adversely affect the rights of an individual under the award. | |
14. | Effective Date of the Plan. The Plan shall become effective on December 1, 1999, the date of its adoption by the Board. | |
15. | Termination. The Board may terminate the Plan or any part thereof at any time, provided that no termination may, without the consent of the individual to whom any award shall theretofore have been made, adversely affect the rights of an individual under the award. | |
16. | Other Actions. Nothing contained in the Plan shall be deemed to preclude other compensation plans which may be in effect from time to time or be construed to limit the authority of the Company to exercise its corporate rights and powers, including, but not by way of limitation, the right of the Company (a) to award options for proper corporate purposes otherwise than under the Plan to an employee or other person, firm, corporation, or association, or (b) to award options to, or assume the option of, any person in connection with the acquisition, by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of the business and assets (in whole or in part) of any person, firm, corporation, or association. |
Page: 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 10.10
SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT dated ___________, by and between General Dynamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), and ___________________ (the Executive).
The Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) recognizes that the possibility of a Change in Control (as hereinafter defined) of the Company exists and that the threat or occurrence of a Change in Control may result in the distraction of its key management personnel because of the uncertainties inherent in such a situation.
The Board has determined that it is essential and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to retain the services of the Executive in the event of the threat or occurrence of a Change in Control and to ensure the Executives continued dedication and efforts in such event without undue concern for the Executives personal financial and employment security.
In order to induce the Executive to remain in the employ of the Company, particularly in the event of the threat or occurrence of a Change in Control, the Company desires to enter into this Agreement to provide the Executive with certain benefits in the event the Executives employment is terminated as a result of, or in connection with, a Change in Control.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective agreements of the parties contained herein, it is agreed as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:
Accounting Firm has the meaning set forth in Section 5.2.
Accrued Compensation means an amount which includes all amounts earned or accrued by the Executive through and including the Termination Date but not paid to the Executive on or prior to such date, including (a) all base salary, (b) reimbursement for all reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by the Executive on behalf of the Company during the period ending on the Termination Date, (c) all vacation pay and (d) all bonuses and incentive compensation (other than the Pro Rata Bonus).
Base Amount means the greater of the Executives annual base salary (a) at the rate in effect on the Termination Date and (b) at the highest rate in effect at any time during the 180-day period prior to a Change in Control, and will include all amounts of the Executives base salary that are deferred under any qualified or non-qualified employee benefit plan of the Company or any other agreement or arrangement.
Beneficial Owner has the meaning as used in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act. The term Beneficially Owned has a correlative meaning.
Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.
Bonus Amount means the current portion of the annual bonus awarded pursuant to the incentive compensation plan, and paid or payable at the conclusion of each fiscal year. The term excludes the equity incentive program portion of the incentive compensation plan and the Pro Rata Bonus.
Cause for the termination of the Executives employment with the Company will be deemed to exist if the Executive has been convicted of a felony or if the Board determines by a resolution adopted in good faith by at least two-thirds of the Board that the Executive has (a) intentionally and continually failed to perform in all material respects the Executives reasonably assigned duties with the Company (other than a failure resulting from the Executives incapacity due to physical or mental disability or illness or from the Executives assignment of duties that would constitute Good Reason for the Executives termination of employment with the Company) which failure has continued for a period of at least 30 days after a written notice of demand for performance has been delivered to the Executive specifying the manner in which the Executive has failed in all material respects to so perform or (b) intentionally engaged in conduct which is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Company; provided that no termination of the Executives employment will be for Cause as set forth in clause (b) hereof unless (i) there has been delivered to the Executive a written notice specifying in reasonable detail the conduct of the Executive of the type described in clause (b) and (ii) the Executive has been provided an opportunity to be heard in person by the Board (with the assistance of the Executives counsel if the Executive so desires). No act, nor failure to act, on the Executives part will be considered intentional unless the Executive has acted, or failed to act, with a lack of good faith and with a lack of reasonable belief that the Executives action or failure to act was in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company.
Change in Control means any following events:
(a) An acquisition (other than directly from the Company) of any voting securities of the Company by any Person immediately after which such Person is the Beneficial Owner of 40% or more of the combined voting power of the Companys then outstanding voting securities; provided that in determining whether a Change in Control has occurred, voting securities which are acquired by (i) an employee benefit plan (or a trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, (ii) the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or (iii) any Person in connection with a Non-Control Transaction (as hereinafter defined), will not constitute an acquisition which results in a Change in Control. |
-2-
(b) Consummation by the Company of: |
(i) a merger, consolidation or reorganization involving the Company, unless: | |
(A) the stockholders of the Company, immediately before such merger, consolidation or reorganization, will own, directly or indirectly, immediately following such merger, consolidation or reorganization, at least 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the corporation resulting from such merger, consolidation or reorganization (the Surviving Corporation) in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the voting securities of the Company immediately before such merger, consolidation or reorganization; | |
(B) the individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board immediately prior to the execution of the agreement providing for such merger, consolidation or reorganization constitute at least 50% of the members of the board of directors of the Surviving Corporation; and | |
(C) no Person (other than the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, any employee benefit plan (or any trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company, the Surviving Corporation, any Subsidiary of the Surviving Corporation, or any Person who, immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or reorganization, was the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company) is the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Surviving Corporations then outstanding voting securities. | |
(D) a transaction described in clauses (A) through (C) above is referred to herein as a ''Non-Control Transaction; | |
(ii) the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or | |
(iii) an agreement for sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to any Person (other than a transfer to a Subsidiary of the Company). |
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control will not be deemed to occur solely because any Person (a Subject Person) acquires Beneficial Ownership of more than the permitted amount of the outstanding voting securities of the Company as a result of the acquisition of voting securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of voting securities outstanding, increases the proportional number of shares Beneficially Owned by the Subject Person, provided that if a Change in Control would occur (but for the operation of this sentence) as a result of the acquisition of voting securities by the Company, and after such share acquisition by the Company, the Subject Person becomes the Beneficial Owner of any additional voting securities which increases |
-3-
the percentage of the then outstanding voting securities Beneficially Owned by the Subject Person, then a Change in Control will be deemed to have occurred. |
(d) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, if the Executives employment with the Company is terminated prior to a Change in Control and the Executive reasonably demonstrates that such termination (i) was at the request of a Person who has indicated an intention or taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change in Control and who subsequently effects a Change in Control or (ii) otherwise occurred in connection with, or in anticipation of, a Change in Control which subsequently occurs, then for all purposes of this Agreement, the date of such Change in Control with respect to the Executive will mean the date immediately prior to the date of such termination of the Executives employment. |
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Company means General Dynamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and includes its Successors.
Continuation Period has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(b)(iii).
Determination has the meaning set forth in Section 5.2.
Disability means a physical or mental disability or illness which substantially impairs the Executives ability to perform the Executives regular duties with the Company for a period of 180 consecutive days or for a period of 270 days in any 365-day period.
Dispute has the meaning set forth in Section 5.2.
Excess Payment has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3.
Excise Tax has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
Final Determination has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3.
Good Reason means the occurrence after a Change in Control of any of the events or conditions described in clauses (a) through (h) hereof:
(a) any (i) change in the Executives status, title, position or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities) which, in the Executives reasonable judgment, represents an adverse change from the Executives status, title, position or responsibilities as in effect at any time within 180 days preceding the date of the Change in Control or at any time thereafter, (ii) assignment to the Executive of duties or responsibilities which, in the Executives reasonable judgment, are inconsistent with the Executives status, title, position or responsibilities as in effect at any time within 180 days preceding the date of the Change in Control or at any time thereafter, or (iii) removal of the Executive from or failure to reappoint or reelect the Executive to any of such offices or positions, in each |
-4-
case except in connection with the termination of the Executives employment for Disability, Cause, as a result of the Executives death or by the Executive other than for Good Reason; | |
(b) a reduction in the Executives base salary or any failure to pay the Executive any compensation or benefits to which the Executive is entitled within five days after the date when due; | |
(c) the imposition of a requirement that the Executive be based at any place outside a 30-mile radius of ______, except for reasonably required travel on Company business which is not materially greater in frequency or duration than prior to the Change in Control; | |
(d) the failure by the Company to (i) continue in effect (without reduction in benefit level or reward opportunities) any material compensation or employee benefit plan in which the Executive was participating at any time within 180 days preceding the date of the Change in Control or at any time thereafter, unless such plan is replaced with a plan that provides substantially equivalent compensation or benefits to the Executive or (ii) provide the Executive with compensation and benefits, in the aggregate, at least equal (in terms of benefit levels and reward opportunities) to those provided for under each other employee benefit plan, program and practice in which the Executive was participating at any time within 1 80 days preceding the date of the Change in Control or at any time thereafter; | |
(e) the insolvency or the filing (by any party, including the Company) of a petition for bankruptcy with respect to the Company, which petition is not dismissed within 60 days; | |
(f) any material breach by the Company of any provision of this Agreement; | |
(g) any purported termination of the Executives employment for Cause by the Company which does not comply with the terms of this Agreement; or | |
(h) the failure of the Company to obtain, as contemplated in Section 6, an agreement, reasonably satisfactory to the Executive, from any Successor to assume and agree to perform this Agreement. |
Any event or condition described in clauses (a) through (h) which occurs prior to a Change in Control but which the Executive reasonably demonstrates (a) was at the request of a Person who has indicated the intention or takes steps reasonably calculated to affect a Change in Control and who subsequently effects a Change in Control or (b) otherwise arose in connection with, or in anticipation of, a Change in Control which subsequently occurs, will constitute Good Reason for purposes of this Agreement notwithstanding that it occurred prior to the Change in Control.
Gross-Up Payment has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
-5-
Notice of Termination means a written notice from the Company of the termination of the Executives employment which indicates the specific termination provision in this Agreement relied upon and which sets forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executives employment under the provision so indicated.
Person has the meaning as used in Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and will include any group as such term is used in such sections.
Pro Rata Bonus means an amount equal to the Bonus Amount multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed in the then fiscal year through and including the Termination Date and the denominator of which is 365.
Securities Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Subsidiary means any corporation with respect to which another specified corporation has the power under ordinary circumstances to vote or direct the voting of sufficient securities to elect a majority of the directors.
Successor means a corporation or other entity acquiring all or substantially all the assets and business of the Company, whether by operation of law, by assignment or otherwise.
Supplemental Retirement Benefit will mean the lump sum actuarial equivalent of the aggregate retirement benefit the Executive would have been entitled to receive under the Companys supplemental and other retirement plans including the General Dynamics Corporation Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees (the Pension Plan). For purposes of the foregoing, the actuarial equivalent will be determined in accordance with the actuarial assumptions used for the calculation of benefits under the Pension Plan as applied immediately prior to the Termination Date in accordance with past practices.
Termination Date means (a) in the case of the Executives death, the Executives date of death, (b) in the case of the termination of the Executives employment with the Company by the Executive for Good Reason, the last day of the Executives employment, and (c) in all other cases, the date specified in the Notice of Termination; provided that if the Executives employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or due to Disability, the date specified in the Notice of Termination will be at least 30 days after the date the Notice of Termination is given to the Executive.
Underpayment has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3.
Window Period has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(a).
-6-
Section 2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement will commence as of the date hereof and will continue in effect until terminated by the Board of Directors, provided, however, that the term of this Agreement will in any case not expire prior to the expiration of 24 months after the occurrence of a Change in Control.
Section 3. Termination of Employment.
If, during the term of this Agreement, the Executives employment with the Company is terminated within 24 months following a Change in Control, the Executive will be entitled to the following compensation and benefits:
(a) If the Executives employment with the Company is terminated (i) by the Company for Cause or Disability, (ii) by reason of the Executives death or (iii) by the Executive other than for Good Reason and other than during the 60-day period commencing on the first anniversary of the date of the occurrence of a Change in Control (the Window Period), the Company will pay to the Executive the Accrued Compensation and, if such termination is other than by the Company for Cause, a Pro Rata Bonus. | |
(b) If the Executives employment with the Company is terminated for any reason other than as specified Section 3.1(a) or during the Window Period, the Executive will be entitled to the following: |
(i) the Company will pay the Executive all Accrued Compensation and a Pro Rata Bonus; | |
(ii) the Company will pay the Executive as severance pay, and in lieu of any further compensation for periods subsequent to the Termination Date, in a single payment an amount in cash equal to times the sum of (A) the Base Amount and (B) the Bonus Amount; | |
(iii) for a period of 18 months (the Continuation Period), the Company will at its expense continue on behalf of the Executive and the Executives dependents and beneficiaries the life insurance, disability, medical, dental and hospitalization benefits provided (A) to the Executive at any time during the 180-day period prior to the Change in Control or at any time thereafter or (B) to other similarly situated executives who continue in the employ of the Company during the Continuation Period. The coverage and benefits (including deductibles and costs) provided in this Section 3.1(b)(iii) during the Continuation Period will be no less favorable to the Executive and the Executives dependents and beneficiaries than the most favorable of such coverages and benefits during any of the periods referred to in clauses (A) and (B) above. The Companys obligation hereunder with respect to the foregoing benefits will be limited to the extent that the Executive obtains any such benefits pursuant to a subsequent employers benefit plans, in which case the Company may reduce the coverage of any benefits it is required to provide the Executive hereunder as long as the coverages |
-7-
and benefits of the combined benefit plans are no less favorable to the Executive than the coverages and benefits required to be provided hereunder. This Section 3.1(b) will not be interpreted so as to limit any benefits to which the Executive or the Executives dependents or beneficiaries may be entitled under any of the Companys employee benefit plans, programs or practices following the Executives termination of employment, including retiree medical and life insurance benefits; | |
(iv) the Company will pay in a single payment an amount in cash equal to the excess of (A) the Supplemental Retirement Benefit determined as if (1) the Executive had remained employed by the Company for an additional year(s) of credited service, (2) the Executives annual compensation during such period had been equal to the Executives Base Salary and the Bonus Amount, (3) the Executive had been fully vested in the Executives benefit under each retirement plan in which the Executive was a participant, (3) the Company had made employer contributions to each defined contribution plan in which the Executive was a participant at the Termination Date in an amount equal to the amount of such contribution for the plan year immediately preceding the Termination Date and (4) the Executive had been fully vested in the Executives benefit under each retirement plan in which the Executive was a participant, over (B) the lump sum actuarial equivalent of the aggregate retirement benefit the Executive is actually entitled to receive under such retirement plans; and | |
(v) any restrictions on any outstanding restricted stock awards granted to the Executive will lapse and such restricted stock awards will become fully vested, all in-the-money stock options will become fully vested, and the Executive will have the right to require the Company to purchase, for cash, any out-of-the-money stock options held by the Executive at a price equal to the fair market value of such options on the date of purchase determined by the Company using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For purposes of this Section 3.1(b)(v), a stock option will be deemed (A) to be in-the-money if, as of the date of determination, the New York Stock Exchange composite quotation for the Companys Common Stock, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, as of the close of business, New York City time, on the immediately preceding trading day (the Applicable Price), exceeds the exercise price per share required to be paid by the holder upon the exercise of such option and (B) to be out-of-the-money if, as of the date of determination, the Applicable Price is equal to or less than such exercise price. |
(c) The amounts provided for in Section 3.1(a) and Sections 3.1(b)(i), (ii) and (iv) will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment by the Company to the Executive within five days after the Termination Date. | |
(d) The Executive will not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment provided for in this Agreement by seeking other employment or otherwise, and no such payment will be offset or reduced by the amount of any compensation or benefits |
-8-
provided to the Executive in any subsequent employment except as specifically provided in Section 3.1(b)(iii). |
3.2. The compensation to be paid to the Executive pursuant to Sections 3.1(a), 3.1 (b)(i) and 3.1 (b)(ii) of this Agreement will be in lieu of any similar severance or termination compensation (i.e., compensation based directly on the Executives annual salary or annual salary and bonus) to which the Executive may be entitled under any other Company severance or termination agreement, plan, program, policy, practice or arrangement. With respect to any other compensation and benefit to be paid or provided to the Executive pursuant to this Section 3, the Executive will have the right to receive such compensation or benefit as herein provided or, if determined by the Company to be more advantageous to the Executive, similar compensation or benefits to which the Executive may be entitled under any other Company severance or termination agreement, plan, program, policy, practice or arrangement. The Executives entitlement to any compensation or benefits of a type not provided in this Agreement will be determined in accordance with the Companys employee benefit plans and other applicable programs, policies and practices as in effect from time to time.
3.3 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the termination of the Executives employment with the company in connection with the sale, divestiture or other disposition of [applicable subsidiary] or part thereof (the Subsidiary) will not be deemed to be a termination of employment of the Executive for purposes of this Agreement provided the Executive is offered employment by the purchaser or acquirer thereof and the Company obtains an agreement from such purchaser or acquirer as contemplated in Section 6, and the Executive will not be entitled to benefits from the Company under this Agreement as a result of such sale, divestiture or other disposition, or as a result of any subsequent termination of employment.
Section 4. Notice of Termination. Following a Change in Control, any purported termination of the Executives employment by the Company will be communicated by a Notice of Termination to the Executive. For purposes of this Agreement, no such purported termination will be effective without such Notice of Termination.
Section 5. Excise Tax Payments.
5.1. In the event that any payment or benefit (within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code) to the Executive or for the Executives benefit paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise in connection with, or arising out of, the Executives employment with the Company or a change in ownership or effective control of the Company or of a substantial portion of its assets (a Payment), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, or any interest or penalties are incurred by the Executive with respect to such excise tax (such excise tax, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereinafter collectively referred to herein as the Excise Tax), then the Executive will be entitled to receive an additional payment (a Gross-Up Payment) in an amount such that after payment by the Executive of all taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes and the Excise Tax, other than interest and penalties imposed by reason of the Executives failure to file timely a tax return or pay taxes shown due on the
-9-
Executives return, and including any Excise Tax imposed upon the Gross-Up Payment), the Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Payments.
5.2. An initial determination as to whether a Gross-Up Payment is required pursuant to this Agreement and the amount of such Gross-Up Payment will be made at the Companys expense by an accounting firm of recognized national standing selected by the Company and reasonably acceptable to the Executive (the Accounting Firm). The Accounting Firm will provide its determination (the Determination), together with detailed supporting calculations and documentation, to the Company and the Executive within five days of the Termination Date, if applicable, or such other time as requested by the Company or by the Executive (provided the Executive reasonably believes that any of the Payments may be subject to the Excise Tax). If the Accounting Firm determines that no Excise Tax is payable by the Executive with respect to a Payment or Payments, it will furnish the Executive with an opinion reasonably acceptable to the Executive that no Excise Tax will be imposed with respect to any such Payment or Payments. Within ten days of the delivery of the Determination to the Executive, the Executive will have the right to dispute the Determination (the Dispute). The Gross-Up Payment, if any, as determined pursuant to this Section 5.2 will be paid by the Company to the Executive within five days of the receipt of the Determination. The existence of the Dispute will not in any way affect the Executives right to receive the Gross-Up Payment in accordance with the Determination. If there is no Dispute, the Determination will be binding, final and conclusive upon the Company and the Executive, subject to the application of Section 5.3.
5.3. As a result of uncertainty in the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code, it is possible that a Gross-Up Payment (or a portion thereof) will be paid which should not be paid (an Excess Payment) or that a Gross-Up Payment (or a portion thereof) which should be paid will not be paid (an Underpayment). An Underpayment will be deemed to have occurred (a) upon notice (formal or informal) to the Executive from any governmental taxing authority that the Executives tax liability (whether in respect of the Executives current taxable year or in respect of any prior taxable year) may be increased by reason of the imposition of the Excise Tax on a Payment or Payments with respect to which the Company has failed to make a sufficient Gross-Up Payment, (b) upon a determination by a court, (c) by reason of a determination by the Company (which will include the position taken by the Company, together with its consolidated group, on its federal income tax return) or (d) upon the resolution of the Dispute to the Executives satisfaction. If an Underpayment occurs, the Executive will promptly notify the Company and the Company will promptly, but in any event at least five days prior to the date on which the applicable government taxing authority has requested payment, pay to the Executive an additional Gross-Up Payment equal to the amount of the Underpayment plus any interest and penalties (other than interest and penalties imposed by reason of the Executives failure to file timely a tax return or pay taxes shown due on the Executives return) imposed on the Underpayment. An Excess Payment will deemed to have occurred upon a Final Determination (as hereinafter defined) that the Excise Tax will not be imposed upon a Payment or Payments (or portion thereof) with respect to which the Executive had previously received a Gross-Up Payment. A Final Determination will be deemed to have occurred when the Executive has received from the applicable government taxing authority a refund of taxes or
-10-
other reduction in the Executives tax liability by reason of the Excise Payment and upon either (i) the date a determination is made by, or an agreement is entered into with, the applicable governmental taxing authority which finally and conclusively binds the Executive and such taxing authority, or in the event that a claim is brought before a court of competent jurisdiction, the date upon which a final determination has been made by such court and either all appeals have been taken and finally resolved or the time for all appeals has expired or (ii) the statute of limitations with respect to the Executives applicable tax return has expired. If an Excess Payment is determined to have been made, the amount of the Excess Payment will be treated as a loan by the Company to the Executive and the Executive will pay to the Company on demand (but not less than 10 days after the determination of such Excess Payment and written notice has been delivered to the Executive) the amount of the Excess Payment plus interest at an annual rate equal to the Applicable Federal Rate provided for in Section 1274(d) of the Code from the date the Gross-Up Payment (to which the Excess Payment relates) was paid to the Executive until the date of repayment to the Company. The Executive will use reasonable cooperative efforts at the request of the Company to assist in the determination of the amount of any Excess Payment or Underpayment made to the Executive pursuant to this Agreement.
5.4. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, in the event that, according to the Determination, an Excise Tax is imposed on any Payment or Payments, the Company will pay to the applicable government taxing authorities as Excise Tax withholding the amount of the Excise Tax that the Company has actually withheld from the Payment or Payments.
Section 6. Successors: Binding Agreement. This Agreement will be binding upon and will inure to the benefit of the Company and its Successors, and the Company will require any Successors to expressly assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession or assignment had taken place. Neither this Agreement nor any right or interest hereunder will be assignable or transferable by the Executive or by the Executives beneficiaries or legal representatives, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. This Agreement will inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Executives legal representatives.
Section 7. Fees and Expenses. The Company will pay as they become due all legal fees and related expenses (including the costs of experts) incurred by the Executive as a result of (a) the Executives termination of employment (including all such fees and expenses, if any, incurred in contesting or disputing any such termination of employment) and (b) the Executive seeking to obtain or enforce any right or benefit provided by this Agreement (including any such fees and expenses incurred in connection with (i) the Dispute and (ii) the Gross-Up Payment, whether as a result of any applicable government taxing authority proceeding, audit or otherwise) or by any other plan or arrangement maintained by the Company under which the Executive is or may be entitled to receive benefits.
Section 8. Notice. For the purposes of this Agreement, notices and all other communications provided for in the Agreement (including the Notice of Termination) will be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered or sent by
-11-
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the respective addresses last given by each party to the other, provided that all notices to the Company will be directed to the attention of the Board with a copy to the Secretary of the Company. All notices and communications will be deemed to have been received on the date of delivery thereof or on the third business day after the mailing thereof, except that notice of change of address will be effective only upon receipt.
Section 9. Nonexclusivity of Rights. Nothing in this Agreement will prevent or limit the Executives continuing or future participation in any benefit, bonus, incentive or other plan or program provided by the Company for which the Executive may qualify, nor will anything herein limit or reduce such rights as the Executive may have under any other agreements with the Company (except for any severance or termination agreement). Amounts which are vested benefits or which the Executive is otherwise entitled to receive under any plan or program of the Company will be payable in accordance with such plan or program, except as specifically modified by this Agreement.
Section 10. No Set-Off. The Companys obligation to make the payments provided for in this Agreement and otherwise to perform its obligations hereunder will not be affected by any circumstances, including any right of set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other right which the Company may have against the Executive or others.
Section 11. Miscellaneous. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged unless such waiver, modification or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by the Executive and the Company. No waiver by either party hereto at any time of any breach by the other party hereto of, or compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement to be performed by such other party will be deemed a waiver of similar or dissimilar provisions or conditions at the same or at any prior or subsequent time. No agreement or representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, with respect to the subject matter hereof have been made by either party which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement.
Section 12. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof. Any action brought by any party to this Agreement will be brought and maintained in a court of competent jurisdiction in New Castle County in the State of Delaware.
Section 13. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement will be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision will not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof.
Section 14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes all prior agreements, if any, understandings and arrangements, oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to severance protection in connection with a Change of Control.
-12-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION |
By: _________________________________
Name: Title: |
By: _________________________________
[Executive] |
-13-
EXHIBIT 10.11
W.P. Wylie
Vice President Human Resources and Administration |
February 13, 2001
Mr. Kenneth C. Dahlberg:
Dear Mr. Dahlberg
On behalf of General Dynamics Corporation, we are pleased to extend an offer to you for the position of Executive Vice President Information Systems and Technology. In this position you will be an officer of the Corporation and will report to Nicholas D. Chabraja, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Please understand that your election to officer status is subject to approval by the Board of Directors. Your starting salary will be paid bi-weekly at a rate equivalent to $450,000 annually.
You will be eligible to participate in the Corporations Incentive Compensation and Long-Term Incentive Programs. Annual awards for Incentive Compensation are dependent upon your performance as well as the corporations performance. The Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP) provides annual awards of stock options and performance-restricted stock. The present value of your long-term award will be approximately $1,100,000. Part of this award is in the form of options and part in the form of performance restricted stock. Please note that all long-term equity awards are subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The value of your total direct compensation (salary, bonus, and long-term equity) is about $2,000,000. Tommy Augustsson (703-876-3473) will discuss the details of this program at your convenience.
In addition, you will be granted restricted shares of General Dynamics stock which will serve to offset the forfeiture of your non-vested Raytheon stock options. The grant value will be the average of the high and low on your first day of work and restrictions will lapse according to the original vesting schedule. Also, you will be granted restricted shares of General Dynamics stock to offset forfeitures of Raytheon shares. These shares will have a two year restriction period.
Using the February 12, 2001 closing prices of Raytheon (RTNb - $33.30) and General Dynamics (GD - $66.41) as an illustration, the resulting awards would be a grant of 40,293 shares of restricted stock. (See Enclosure for details of the calculations of this example.)
3190 Fairview Park Drive
Falls Church, VA 22042-4523
Tel 703 876 3415
Fax 703 876 3550
pwylie@generaldynamics.com
General Dynamics Private Information
Page 2
February 13, 2001
In the event you are involuntarily terminated, other than for cause, during the first three years of your employment, your salary and benefits would continue through that period.
This offer of employment is contingent upon filling out the application form previously transmitted to you as well as successful completion of a pre-employment drug screening.
Also, a presumptive condition for employment is that your bonus for performance year 2000 is paid by your current employer and that the non-vested options and restricted shares indeed are forfeited.
As a corporate officer, you will be offered the Corporate Office benefits programs (i.e., health insurance, disability insurance, etc.). Henry Eickelberg (703-876-3409) and Bob Stewart (703-876-3408) will enroll you in these programs upon your first day of work. The perquisite program for corporate officers has previously been transmitted to you. If you have any questions, please call me.
Please acknowledge your acceptance or rejection of this offer by completing the Acceptance/Rejection enclosure and returning it to me by 2 March 2001. If you accept the offer, please complete and return the application form also.
We at General Dynamics are looking forward to a positive response from you.
Sincerely,
/s/ T.R. Augustsson
for W.P. Wylie
Enclosures
EXHIBIT 10.12
Mr. William W. Boisture
President & Chief Operating Officer
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
500 Gulfstream Road
Savannah, GA. 31402
Dear Bill:
Please accept this letter to memorialize our understanding of certain issues agreed to between you and General Dynamics Corporation.
This letter agreement is predicated on your remaining employed with General Dynamics Corporation through December 31, 2004. During the term of this Agreement, you will continue to receive an annual base salary that is no less than your current base salary. Consistent with our normal practices, your base salary and bonus will be reviewed annually.
In further consideration, we have agreed to the following:
Relocation from Savannah, Georgia to Ft. Worth, Texas:
General Dynamics Corporation will reimburse you for the cost of moving from Savannah, Georgia to Ft. Worth Texas. This includes the cost of packing/unpacking, moving (including transporting one automobile) and storing (for up to six months, if necessary) your household items and furniture. General Dynamics Corporation will also reimburse you for the cost of reasonable real estate commissions and closing costs (including tide charges, settlement costs and reasonable attorneys fees) you may incur in the course of selling your principal residence in Savannah, Georgia.
In the event that your employment terminates prior to December 31, 2004, you agree to reimburse the Company for the moving expenses and real estate commissions paid on your behalf.
Retirement Agreement Benefit:
In exchange for devoting your full and exclusive services to General Dynamics Corporation (and its subsidiaries), effective as of the date below, General Dynamics Corporation agrees to pay you a Retirement Agreement Benefit. Your Retirement Agreement Benefit shall be calculated as provided below from the available general assets of the Corporation.
You will continue to participate in the Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Pension Plan (the Savannah Plan) and accrue benefits thereunder. Your monthly Retirement Agreement Benefit will be equal to: (l) the benefit calculated in accordance with the
general provisions of the General Dynamics Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees (the General Dynamics Plan), as amended, but without regard to the limitations imposed by Section 415 or 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code (as amended) reduced by (2) the monthly retirement benefit you are eligible to receive under the Savannah Plan (including post-retirement increases as received). Credited Service used in calculating your Retirement Agreement Benefit shall reflect both your prior employment with General Dynamics (from June 26, 1978 to October 9, 1979) and your period of service with Gulfstream. The General Dynamics Plan benefit is calculated on a single-life basis equal to the average of your final highest consecutive sixty (60) months of base salary rates (including amounts eligible to be received in cash, if any, under the General Dynamics Corporation Executive Compensation Program) times your Credited Service times 1-1/3 percent. If you retire before age 62, your Retirement Agreement Benefit will be reduced at the rate of 2-1/2 percent for each year (or portion thereof) your retirement age is less than 62 years old. In addition, your Retirement Agreement Benefit shall be reduced (on an actuarial equivalent basis) for payment in a form other than a single-life annuity. Your Retirement Agreement Benefit must be paid at the same time and in the same form that you elect to receive your retirement benefit under the Savannah Plan.
Your Retirement Agreement Benefit shall be earned site rate of 2-1/12% for each completed calendar month (starting from January 1, 2001) of active employment with General Dynamics Corporation. You shall be eligible for the entire benefit if you maintain active employment with General Dynamics Corporation through and including December 31, 2004. Your Retirement Agreement Benefit is an unfunded promise to pay money in the future and shall at all times be subject to the claims of general creditors of the Corporation.
You shall be eligible for full payment regardless of when you leave employment if your employment is terminated by reason of your incurring a total and permanent disability or your employment is terminated without cause. You shall be deemed totally and permanently disabled if you qualify for a disability benefit from the Social Security Administration. Your separation of employment shall be deemed to have terminated without cause as shall be determined within the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Your Retirement Agreement Benefit shall be forfeited in full if your employment with the Corporation is terminated for cause as shall be determined within the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
If you should die prior to retiring from active service, your surviving spouse, if any, shall receive a monthly benefit payable from the Corporation equal to the amount determined in the manner described above but reflecting the pre-retirement surviving spouse provisions of the General Dynamics Plan (50% of the benefit that you would have received had you retired on the date immediately prior to your death reduced for commencement prior to age 62, if applicable, and for form of payment) and reduced by the pre-retirement surviving spouses benefit payable under the Savannah Plan including post-retirement increases.
I am pleased to provide you with these benefits. If this letter meets with your approval, please indicate your acceptance by signing and dating below and return one copy to me.
Sincerely,
General Dynamics Corporation
/s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja
Nicholas D. Chabraja
Chairman of the Board
And Chief Executive Officer
Accepted this 2 day of October, 2001:
/s/ William W. Boisture
William W. Boisture
Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
2001 Sales by Customer Base
The companys businesses include information and communications technology, land and amphibious combat systems, naval and commercial shipbuilding, and business aviation. These are high technology businesses that use design, manufacturing and program management expertise together with advanced technology and the integration of complex systems as part of their everyday operations. The companys primary customers are the U.S. military, other government organizations, the armed forces of allied nations, and a diverse base of corporate and industrial buyers.
Sixty percent of the companys sales are from U.S. defense spending, which has risen steadily over the past few years. From a low of $42.4 billion in 1996, defense procurement is projected to reach $98.9 billion by 2007, according to the Presidents 2003 budget. The companys major defense programs are well-funded, long-term initiatives with a high probability of follow-on work. These programs include existing, multiyear efforts as well as new, transformational systems used by the military services. The companys international defense business continued to grow in 2001 with significant new programs from governments in Europe, the Middle East and Asia. The companys business aviation segment had its strongest year in 2001, with record revenue and operating earnings.
The companys management concentrates on creating shareholder value through operational execution and disciplined capital deployment. Management engages in continuous process improvement that frequently results in improved margins. Strong cash flows are generated through a focus on return on invested capital. The company has achieved and expects to continue to generate significant free cash after satisfying internal investment requirements. This free cash is deployed as part of a disciplined acquisition program and on the repurchase of company shares in the open market.
Business Acquisitions
During 2001, the company acquired five businesses for a total of $1.5 billion. In late January, the company acquired Primex Technologies, Inc., renamed Ordnance and Tactical Systems, expanding the companys market position in ordnance manufacturing to include medium- and large-caliber ammunition. This acquisition also expanded the companys portfolio in what it believes to be the high growth areas of missile and precision-guided munitions through existing subcontract relationships. In mid-February, the company acquired four aircraft service and maintenance facilities from BBA North America. These operations now conduct business as General Dynamics Aviation Services, and are located in Dallas, Las Vegas, Minneapolis and West Palm Beach. In early June, the company acquired substantially all of the assets of Galaxy Aerospace Company LP. This acquisition broadened the Gulfstream product line with the mid-size Gulfstream 100 and the super mid-size Gulfstream 200 creating market-entry, add-on and move-up opportunities for a wider range of customers. In late July, the company acquired Spains leading defense manufacturer, Empresa Nacional Santa Bárbara de Industrias Militares, S.A., of Madrid, Spain, and Santa Bárbara Blindados, S.A., of Seville. The new combined entity, renamed Santa Bárbara Sistemas, S.A., produces combat vehicles and munitions and is expected to enhance the companys export abilities into Europe, North Africa and South America. Also, at the end of September, the company acquired Integrated Information Systems Group from Motorola, Inc. Renamed Decision Systems, this business provides technologies, products and systems
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 15
that strengthen the companys position in what management believes to be rapidly growing information assurance, communications and situational awareness markets here and abroad.
CONSOLIDATED OVERVIEW
Results of Operations
|
|
|
The companys net sales for 2001 were $12.2 billion, an increase of 17 percent over 2000. Excluding the increase attributable to businesses acquired during the year, net sales increased by more than seven percent, with organic revenue growth realized in each of the companys business segments. Net sales for 2000 were $10.4 billion, an increase of 16 percent over 1999 sales of $9 billion. Organic revenue growth was approximately five percent of this increase.
Net earnings for 2001 grew 13 percent to $915, before favorable tax benefits, resulting in a per diluted share increase to $4.51 from $4.03 in 2000. Net earnings rose in part from organic earnings growth in all of the companys business segments as well as contribution from acquired businesses. Net earnings for 2000 grew to $811 from $715 in 1999, an increase of 13 percent, before favorable tax benefits in both years. Net earnings per diluted share before tax benefits increased 14 percent to $4.03 in 2000 from $3.54 in 1999. Other non-recurring items in 1999 resulted in an insignificant impact to net earnings.
Cash flow from operating activities has steadily increased since 1999, totaling $1.1 billion in 2001. The company ended 2001 with a cash balance of $442, up from $177 at year-end 2000. Net debt increased to $1.5 billion from $336 at the end of 2000, primarily from the $1.5 billion investment in acquisitions discussed earlier. With adequate funds on hand and the capacity for additional long-term borrowings, management has the financial capability to execute its operating and financial strategy.
16 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
Expenses for non-operating items were $5 in 2001, essentially unchanged from 2000 expenses of $7. During 1999, the company recognized $43 in non-operating expenses. The majority of these costs were incurred or written off as a result of acquiring Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream), and included transaction expenses and unamortized debt costs on obligations repaid shortly after the acquisition. Net interest expense decreased to $56 in 2001 from $60 in 2000 on a higher average debt balance because of lower average borrowing rates. The 2000 net interest expense of $60 increased from $34 in 1999 due to higher average commercial paper balance and decreased interest income as cash was used for business acquisitions.
The companys effective tax rate was 33.8 percent, 28.6 percent and 21.8 percent for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. During 2001, the company reduced its liabilities for tax contingencies and recognized a non-cash benefit of $28. During both 2000 and 1999, the company recognized favorable tax benefits of $90 and $165, respectively, from the settlement of outstanding tax issues with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), including refund claims for research and experimentation tax credits.
Backlog
The company ended 2001 with a total backlog of $26.8 billion, an increase of 36 percent over the 2000 backlog of $19.7 billion. The increase stems from key program awards, higher business aircraft orders and growth through acquisition. Funded backlog has increased steadily from $12 billion in 1999 to $19.4 billion in 2001.
The company's defense businesses represent $20.2 billion of the 2001 backlog, of which approximately $15 billion is funded. For these businesses, total backlog represents the estimated remaining sales value of work to be performed under firm contracts. Funded backlog represents the portion of total backlog that has been appropriated by Congress and funded by the procuring agency.
Aerospace year-end 2001 backlog approximates $6.3 billion. Of total backlog, $4.2 billion is for orders for which the company has entered into definitive purchase contracts and has received non-refundable deposits from the customers. The backlog also includes $2.1 billion in options to purchase new aircraft and agreements to provide future aircraft maintenance and support services. A significant portion of the Aerospace backlog consists of an agreement with an unaffiliated customer who purchases the aircraft for use in its fractional ownership program, Executive Jet International (Executive Jet). Backlog with Executive Jet, a unit of Berkshire Hathaway and the leader in the fractional market, represents 43 percent of funded and 79 percent of unfunded Aerospace backlog. Following UAL Corporation's announcement on March 22, 2002 that it was closing its Avolar subsidiary, which was to engage in a fractional ownership program, the company terminated its agreements with Avolar, which previously represented $2.5 billion of total backlog. Prior to the termination of the Avolar agreements, contracts with Avolar represented approximately $800 of firm contracts backlog for 36 aircraft. The company believes that it will be able to re-market the aircraft previously under contract to Avolar.
The companys coal and aggregates operations add approximately $300 to year-end 2001 backlog, substantially all of which is funded.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 17
REVIEW OF OPERATING SEGMENTS
The company operates in four primary business groups: Information Systems and
Technology, Combat Systems, Marine Systems, and Aerospace. The company also
owns certain commercial operations, which are identified for reporting purposes
as Other.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY
Results of Operations and Outlook
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
2,800
$
2,388
$
1,422
260
221
127
9.3
%
9.3
%
8.9
%
Net sales increased $412 and operating earnings increased $39 in 2001 due in part to the acquisition of Decision Systems at the end of September. Excluding Decision Systems results, net sales and operating earnings grew by approximately seven percent. In 2000, net sales increased $966, due in large part to the September 1999 acquisition of three business units from GTE Corporation. In 2000, operating earnings increased $94 because of that acquisition and a five-percent growth in organic earnings.
Over two-thirds of the Information Systems and Technology contracts are fixed price, which provides the company opportunities to increase margins through improved efficiencies and processes. In order to best achieve these opportunities, the company realigned the group into fewer reporting organizations. The Information Systems and Technology group enters 2002 with five business units Advanced Information Systems, C4 Systems, Network Systems, General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited, and the newly acquired Decision Systems.
18 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
Information Systems and Technology backlog rose to $5 billion in 2001, $3 billion higher than in 2000. The significant growth in 2001 stems from key program awards and the acquisition of Decision Systems. Funded backlog at year-end 2001 is 95 percent of the total.
Significant Awards and Other Contracts
The most significant addition to the groups backlog during the year was a $2.4 billion contract that the U.K. Ministry of Defence awarded to the company in July 2001 for the BOWMAN program. BOWMAN is a secure digital voice and data communications system for the U.K. armed forces.
Also during 2001, the Taiwanese Army awarded the company a $390 contract for the second phase of the three-phase Improved Mobile Subscriber Equipment tactical communications systems. Phase I of the program began in 1996, with operational testing completed in 2000. Phase II will provide significant technology upgrades through 2005.
Other contracts in the 2001 backlog are the design, integration, installation and maintenance of telecommunications systems for the U.S. military, federal agencies and commercial customers, including a Navy/Marine Corps Intranet subcontract and the Army Installation Information Infrastructure Modernization program. Also included are various contracts that provide processing and mission computing systems for several U.S. avionics platforms (including the F-18, JSTARS and AYK-14 production programs), strategic fire control development and production, guidance engineering services, and training services and hardware for the Trident -class submarine.
Decision Systems added approximately $550 total backlog to the Information
Systems and Technology year-end 2001 position, including contracts for
command and control systems, the Navys digital modular radio, information
assurance and space and terrestrial communications products.
COMBAT SYSTEMS
Results of Operations and Outlook
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
2,210
$
1,273
$
1,290
238
156
155
10.8
%
12.3
%
12.0
%
Net sales increased $937 and operating earnings increased $82 in 2001 because of strong organic growth and the acquisition of two businesses, Ordnance and Tactical Systems and Santa Bárbara Sistemas, during the year. Initial operating margin rates from the acquisitions were modestly lower than the historical segment performance and primarily account for the lower overall margin rate for the full year. Excluding business acquisitions, net sales for 2001 increased by approximately 25 percent, stemming from new work on the Stryker program, previously referred to as the Interim Armored Vehicle program, and additional work on the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) and armament programs, with approximately 15 percent growth in operating earnings. Net sales and operating earnings in 2000 were essentially flat compared with 1999.
The company expects Combat Systems full-year 2002 operating margins to remain consistent with 2001, but sees opportunity for margin expansion through
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 19
efforts to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies as the new acquisitions are fully integrated.
Combat Systems backlog grew to $5.2 billion in 2001, $3.4 billion higher than 2000. This significant increase stems from several major awards and two business acquisitions. Included in the backlog are design programs for transformational systems, advanced technology awards that support development of the Armys Future Combat Systems and a wide range of vehicles and vehicle systems, including long-term production programs for the U.S. and Spanish armies heavy armored vehicles. Production awards for programs currently in design are likely, extending the companys deliveries well into the next decade. Funded backlog at year-end 2001 is $3.4 billion.
Transformational Systems
In November 2000, the Army awarded GM GDLS Defense Group, a joint venture between the company and General Motors Canada Ltd., a six-year requirements contract to equip its Brigade Combat Teams with an eight-wheeled armored vehicle called the Stryker. The 2001 backlog includes approximately $350 for the companys share of the development, test, evaluation and production of the first 466 Strykers. Delivery of the vehicles began in February 2002.
The Marine Corps awarded the company a $712 contract for the systems development and demonstration phase of the AAAV program in July 2001. Low-rate initial production is scheduled to begin in 2004, followed by full-rate production in 2006.
The company received approximately $100 in advanced technology awards during the year that will support the development of the Future Combat Systems program. These awards include research and development on unmanned ground vehicles, and advanced hybrid electric drive systems.
Also included in backlog is research and development work on the Armys Crusader Self-Propelled Howitzer program. The companys share on this program is approximately 25 percent.
Heavy Armored Systems
The Army awarded the company a $741 fixed-price multiyear contract in March 2001 to upgrade an additional 307 M1A2 Abrams tanks with the System Enhancement Package. This award is a follow-on to the $1.3 billion, 580-vehicle fixed-price contract awarded to the company in 1996. During 2001, the company delivered the final 72 tanks from the 1996 contract and 42 from the follow-on award. Year-end backlog includes the remaining 265 tanks under the upgrade program, with deliveries scheduled through 2004.
The 2001 backlog also includes production of the Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge vehicles for the U.S. Army, M1A1 Abrams tank hardware kits for the Egyptian tank co-production program, systems technical support for the M1A2, and engines for international customers.
Santa Bárbara Sistemas
Santa Bárbara Sistemas adds approximately $1.6 billion in production and munitions contracts to the Combat Systems year-end backlog, the majority of which are fixed-price production programs. These production programs include contracts to provide the Spanish army 235 Leopard main battle tanks, built under license from a German company, with deliveries beginning in late 2002 and extending through 2008. Also included is a contract for delivery of 48 Pizarro tracked infantry fighting vehicles.
20 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
Armament and Munitions
Armament and munitions programs are approximately $1.2 billion of Combat
Systems year-end 2001 backlog, over 60 percent of which comes from Ordnance and
Tactical Systems. Production and development contract backlog includes medium-
and large-caliber ammunition, propellants, satellite propulsion products and
armament programs. The backlog also includes systems management and production
of over 300,000 rockets, warheads and motors for the Armys 2.75-inch Hydra 70
rocket system, single- and multi-barrel medium-caliber gun systems, individual-
and crew-served weapons, and reactive armor tiles for the Bradley Fighting
Vehicle.
MARINE SYSTEMS
Results of Operations and Outlook
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
3,612
$
3,413
$
3,088
310
324
328
8.6
%
9.5
%
10.6
%
Net sales rose $199 in 2001 with increased work on design programs and early-stage production programs offsetting a modest decline in mature production program volume. Operating earnings decreased $14 in 2001 primarily because of the shift in work from mature programs to lower margin design and cost-plus work. In 2000, net sales increased $325 largely from additional work on the Virginia -class submarine, DD-21 design and ship repair. This increase was offset partially by lower volume on the DDG-51 program resulting from a 55-day work stoppage at the companys Bath Iron Works shipyard late in the year. In 2000, operating earnings remained essentially even with 1999 because of lower margin DD-21 design, repair work and the work stoppage at Bath Iron Works.
The company expects Marine Systems 2002 revenues and earnings to remain similar to last year. However, margins should improve in 2003 with resultant earnings growth. In 2001, the company completed a new land-level facility at Bath Iron Works, which is expected to increase cost efficiency in low-rate production. The company plans to complete lift capacity and steel handling enhancements at the NASSCO shipyard during 2002. These facilities improvements give rise to opportunities for improving margins through more efficient workflow.
Marine Systems backlog for 2001 totaled $10.1 billion, of which $6.7 billion is funded. The backlog includes long-term production programs scheduled for delivery through 2008, with likely follow-on work through the end of the decade. The 2000 backlog was $11.2 billion. The company expects Marine Systems backlog to hold firm through the next few years and then grow consistent with growth in the Navys shipbuilding plan embedded in the Presidents 2003 budget.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 21
Surface Combatants
The 2001 backlog includes contracts with the Navy for constructing eight Arleigh Burke -class destroyers (DDG-51) and an amphibious assault ship, the LPD-19, the third in the Navys new San Antonio -class of amphibious assault ships. The company is a member of a three-contractor team that was awarded a cost reimbursable contract to design and build the San Antonio -class ships.
Nuclear Submarines
The 2001 backlog includes a contract to construct the first four Virginia -class submarines. The Navy awarded the contract in 1998 for an initial value of $4.2 billion. Delivery of the first submarine is scheduled for 2004 and the fourth for 2008. Construction work is shared equally between the company as prime contractor and Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (Newport News) as subcontractor, in accordance with the terms of a Team Agreement between the company and Newport News. The Presidents 2003 budget includes full funding for a fifth submarine.
In December 1999, the Navy awarded the company an $887 modification for the third and final Seawolf submarine. Delivery is scheduled for 2004.
The 2001 backlog also includes contracts for submarine logistics support services.
Auxiliary and Commercial Ships
The backlog includes a $709 Navy contract awarded to the company in October 2001 for the design and construction of the first two T-AKE ships, a new class of dry-cargo combat logistics ship. The award includes options for 10 more ships that the Navy can exercise over the next six years for a potential contract value of $3.7 billion. Functional design work on the T-AKE began in late 2001 and delivery of both ships is scheduled for 2005. Funding has been appropriated for the third and fourth ships.
In September 2000, BP Oil Shipping Company, USA (BP) awarded the company a $630 contract to design and build three double-hull crude oil tankers, with options for three additional vessels. In September 2001, BP exercised an option for a fourth ship with a value of approximately $200. Design work on the tankers is underway. Construction of the first ship will begin in 2002, with delivery scheduled for late 2003. Deliveries of subsequent ships are planned for 2004, 2005 and 2006.
Totem Ocean Trailer Express, Inc. (TOTE) awarded the company a contract for approximately $300 in December 1999 to build two roll-on/roll-off cargo ships for TOTEs cargo steamship service from Tacoma, Washington to Anchorage, Alaska. The contract has an option for a third ship. Construction on the first ship started in 2001. Deliveries are scheduled for 2002 and 2003.
In February 2000, the Navy awarded a $230 contract to the company for the construction of its eighth strategic sealift ship, scheduled for delivery in late 2002.
The backlog also includes repair contracts for naval vessels.
AEROSPACE
Results of Operations and Outlook
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
3,265
$
3,029
$
2,909
625
592
482
19.1
%
19.5
%
16.6
%
Net sales in 2001 increased $236 primarily because of the Galaxy Aerospace acquisition in June 2001, which added the Gulfstream 100 and Gulfstream 200 aircraft. Operating earnings increased $33 in 2001 as a result of higher sales and improved cost performance in both green aircraft production and completion. This increase was offset partially by slightly higher research and development expenses for new product development, expenses from acquisitions and severance costs. Operating margins were slightly lower in 2001 because of the introduction of the less expensive lower margin aircraft acquired in the Galaxy Aerospace transaction.
22 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
In 2000, net sales increased $120 on slightly fewer deliveries than in 1999 due largely to the mix of aircraft delivered. Operating earnings increased $110 primarily because of improved cost performance from reduced cycle time, lean manufacturing initiatives in new aircraft production and completions, and aircraft mix.
The company anticipates 2002 total green aircraft production to increase with the full-year inclusion of the acquired Gulfstream 100 and Gulfstream 200 aircraft models, offset partially by a decrease in production of approximately 10 fewer large-cabin aircraft. As a result of efforts to improve cost performance, including some reductions in force and other continuous process improvements, the company anticipates that Aerospace full-year 2002 operating earnings will be comparable with 2001.
Summary of Aircraft Statistical Information
Aircraft contracts usually provide for two major milestones, the manufacture of the green aircraft and its completion, which includes exterior painting and installation of customer-selected interiors and optional avionics. Revenues are initially recorded when green aircraft are delivered to the customer and subsequently when the customer accepts final delivery of the fully outfitted aircraft.
The following summarizes certain key unit data related to the Aerospace
business group:
2001
(1)
2000
1999
121
62
42
2
20
2
123
82
44
54
1
10
131
87
80
63
18
37
194
105
117
49
47
46
84
71
70
98
70
75
Aircraft in the backlog have deliveries expected through 2008.
(1) | Excludes contracts with Avolar for 36 aircraft plus options for 66 more, which were terminated on March 25, 2002. |
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 23
The Aerospace group backlog increased 43 percent in 2001, to $6.3 billion from $4.4 billion in 2000. This significant increase is attributable to another strong year for aircraft orders, including a large order placed by Executive Jet, a unit of Berkshire Hathaway and the leader in the fractional market.
Forty-eight percent, or $2 billion, of the 2001 firm contracts backlog is with commercial customers other than Executive Jet and covers a wide spectrum of industries and customer groups. Backlog with Executive Jet approximates $1.8 billion, which includes firm contracts for 78 aircraft. The 2001 firm contracts backlog also contains approximately $400 from government customers, including orders from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Japanese Coast Guard, and Israel's Ministry of Defense for special mission aircraft.
Options from Executive Jet, totaling $1 billion for 55 aircraft, make up the majority of the options backlog. Over 75 percent of the maintenance and support services backlog is also with Executive Jet.
Following UAL Corporation's announcement on March 22, 2002 that it was closing its Avolar subsidiary, which was to engage in a fractional ownership program, the company terminated its agreements with Avolar, which previously represented $2.5 billion of total backlog. Prior to the termination of the Avolar agreements, contracts with Avolar represented approximately $800 of firm contracts backlog for 36 aircraft. The company believes that it will be able to re-market the aircraft previously under contract to Avolar.
OTHER
The companys Other businesses consist of Freeman Energy, engaged in coal
mining, Material Service, engaged in the supply of aggregates to the
construction industry, and a leasing operation for liquefied natural gas
tankers.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
276
$
253
$
250
52
36
111
Earnings for 2001 reflected higher volume and profits in the aggregates and coal mining operations. In 2000, operating earnings corresponded to historical levels against slightly higher sales. Operating earnings for 1999 included $65 related to several non-recurring events, including the merger of the companys and Gulfstreams commercial pension plans, which resulted in the recognition of previously deferred gains of $126. Also during 1999, management decided not to make additional investments in its undeveloped high sulfur coal reserves and revalued these coal reserves and related assets, resulting in a non-cash charge to earnings of $61.
24 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
After spending $1.5 billion for acquisitions during 2001, the company ended the year with a cash balance of $442, net debt of $1,493, and a debt-to-capital ratio of 30 percent. With cash flow from business operations totaling $1 billion for 2001, the company expects to continue to generate funds from operations well in excess of its short- and long-term liquidity needs. Management defines cash flow from business operations, an internal performance measurement, as after-tax cash provided by business unit operating activities, net of capital expenditures and before corporate items. Management believes that the company has adequate funds on hand and capacity for additional long-term borrowings to provide ample strategic flexibility.
The following is a discussion of the companys major operating, investing and financing activities for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 as classified on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,103, $1,071 and $1,016 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The increase in 2001 over 2000 was due to cash generated from growth in the companys defense operations. This increase was offset partially by a decrease in cash from the Aerospace groups operations, primarily caused by the timing of aircraft payments. The increase in 2000 over 1999 was due in large part to the increase in cash from favorable order activity and the timing of aircraft payments in the Aerospace group. The increase in 2000 also stemmed from including the full-year results of the three business units acquired from GTE Corporation compared with only four months in 1999.
Income Taxes. During 2001, the company reduced its liabilities for tax contingencies. The company recognized a non-cash benefit of $28, or $.14 per share, as a result of this adjustment. During 2000 and 1999, the company settled outstanding tax issues with the IRS, including its refund claims for research and experimentation tax credits, for the tax years 1990 through 1993 and 1986 through 1989. The company received cash refunds related to these settlements of $43 in 2000 and $334 in 1999.
Income tax payments were $326, $281 and $303 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, and included federal, foreign and state taxes.
Interest Expense. Cash paid for interest was $70, $78 and $52 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Termination of A-12 Program. As discussed further in Note P to the Consolidated Financial Statements, litigation on the A-12 program termination has been in progress since 1991. In the event the company is ultimately found to have been in default on the contract, the government contends the companys liability for principal and interest would be approximately $1.2 billion pretax, or $625 after-tax. The company has sufficient resources to pay such an obligation if required, and retain ample liquidity through internally generated cash flow from operations, additional borrowing capacity, as well as the ability to raise capital in the equity markets.
Cash Used for Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $1,746 in 2001, $329 in 2000 and $1,223 in 1999. The primary uses of cash in investing activities are business acquisitions and capital expenditures.
Business Acquisitions. On September 28, 2001, the company acquired Integrated Information Systems Group from Motorola, Inc. for $825 in cash.
On June 5, 2001, the company acquired substantially all of the assets of Galaxy Aerospace Company LP for $330 in cash, after a purchase price adjustment received during the first quarter of 2002. The selling parties may receive additional payments, up to a maximum of approximately $300 through 2006, contingent on the achievement of specific revenue targets.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 25
On January 26, 2001, the company acquired Primex Technologies, Inc. for $334 in cash, plus the assumption of $204 in outstanding debt, $149 of which was repaid at the time of the acquisition.
Also during 2001, the company acquired four aircraft service and maintenance facilities from BBA North America, which now conduct business as General Dynamics Aviation Services, and Spains leading defense manufacturer, renamed Santa Bárbara Sistemas by the company.
On September 1, 1999, the company acquired three business units comprising Government Systems Corporation from GTE Corporation for $1.01 billion in cash.
The company financed the above acquisitions by issuing commercial paper. For further discussion of these acquisitions, see Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital Expenditures. The company completed a facility modernization project at its Bath Iron Works shipyard in 2001. The company invested a total of approximately $240, of which $105 was expended during 2000 and $115 expended through 1999. The company had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2001.
Sale of Assets. On February 15, 2001, Gulfstream sold its engine overhaul business for $55.
The company received approximately $40 in cash during the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 from the sale of certain vacant real estate located in southern California.
Cash Used for Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $908 in 2001, primarily from the debt proceeds used to finance the business acquisitions discussed above. This compares to cash used of $835 in 2000 and cash provided of $267 in 1999.
Debt Proceeds, Net. The company received $825 in net proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper during 2001. As of December 31, 2001, the company had $1,165 of commercial paper outstanding at an average yield of approximately 2.06 percent with an average term of 39 days. The company expects to reissue commercial paper as it matures and has the option to extend the term up to 270 days. During 2001, the company secured two new committed lines of credit totaling $2 billion, split evenly between a 364-day and a 5-year term facility. Both facilities back the commercial paper program and replace the companys previous lines of credit, which totaled $1.4 billion.
On August 27, 2001, the company issued $500 of three-year floating rate notes due September 1, 2004. Interest on the notes resets quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 0.22 percent, and is payable each March, June, September and December. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time after September 1, 2002, and prior to their maturity at 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus any accrued but unpaid interest on the date the notes are redeemed. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay a portion of the borrowings under the companys commercial paper program. On February 8, 2002, the company commenced an offer to exchange all original outstanding floating rate notes due 2004 for an equal principal amount of floating rate exchange notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The exchange offer expired on March 11, 2002. The terms of the exchange notes are substantially identical to the outstanding notes, except that the exchange notes are freely tradable. These floating rate notes are guaranteed by certain of the companys subsidiaries.
Share Repurchases. On March 7, 2000, the companys board of directors authorized management to repurchase up to 10 million shares of the companys issued and outstanding common stock in the open market. During 2001, the company repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares of its common stock in the open market for a total of $113. During 2000, the company repurchased approximately 4.1 million shares for $208.
Dividends. On March 6, 2002, the companys board of directors declared an increased regular quarterly dividend of $.30 per share. The company previously increased the quarterly dividend to $.28 per share in March 2001, to $.26 per share in March 2000 and to $.24 per share in March 1999.
26 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Critical Accounting Policies. The policies that management believes are critical and require the use of significant business judgment in their application are the companys revenue recognition policies. Estimating is an integral part of a contractors business activities, and it is necessary to revise estimates on contracts continually as the work progresses. Such changes in estimates may necessitate revision of earnings rates and, accordingly, earnings reported in the future. The companys revenue recognition policies are summarized in Note A of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Market Risk. The estimated fair value of the companys financial instruments approximates carrying value. The companys investment securities carry fixed rates of interest over their respective maturity terms. The company does not use derivatives to alter the interest characteristics of these instruments.
The companys operations attempt to minimize the effects of currency risk by borrowing externally in the local currency or by hedging their purchases made in foreign currencies, when practical. The company is exposed to the effects of foreign currency fluctuations on the U.S. dollar value of earnings from its international operations. As a matter of policy, the company does not engage in currency speculation. The company periodically enters into foreign currency derivatives, including forward exchange and currency swap contracts, to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
One of the companys Canadian subsidiaries holds privately placed U.S. dollar denominated senior notes of $150, which mature in September 2008. The subsidiary also has a currency swap that fixes its foreign currency variability on both the principal and interest portions of these notes. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of this cash flow hedge was an $11 asset, which offset the effect of changes in the currency exchange rate on the related debt.
There were no material derivative instruments designated as fair value or net investment hedges during the year ended December 31, 2001.
New Accounting Standards. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, in October 2001 and No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, in August 2001. SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, including discontinued operations. The statement also broadens the definition of discontinued operations. SFAS 143 requires companies to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, and capitalize the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The company is required to adopt SFAS 144 during the first quarter of 2002 and SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of the standards to have a material impact on the companys results of operations or financial condition.
On June 30, 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, to be accounted for using the purchase method. The provisions of SFAS 142 eliminate amortization of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives, and require an impairment assessment at least annually by applying a fair-value-based test. The company is required to adopt SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. The company anticipates an annual increase to net earnings of approximately $45, or $.22 per diluted share, from the elimination of goodwill amortization. Management does not expect the other provisions of the statements to have a material impact on the companys results of operations or financial condition.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 27
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
Year Ended December 31
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2001
2000
1999
$
12,163
$
10,356
$
8,959
10,678
9,027
7,756
1,485
1,329
1,203
(56
)
(60
)
(34
)
(5
)
(7
)
(43
)
1,424
1,262
1,126
481
361
246
$
943
$
901
$
880
$
4.69
$
4.51
$
4.40
$
4.65
$
4.48
$
4.36
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
28 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December
31
(Dollars in millions)
2001
2000
$
442
$
177
996
798
1,737
1,238
1,289
953
429
385
4,893
3,551
1,768
1,294
648
528
3,110
2,003
650
611
6,176
4,436
$
11,069
$
7,987
$
1,211
$
340
904
717
2,464
1,844
4,579
2,901
724
173
1,238
1,093
1,962
1,266
694
619
4,778
4,059
(930
)
(833
)
(14
)
(25
)
4,528
3,820
$
11,069
$
7,987
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 29
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31
(Dollars in millions)
2001
2000
1999
$
943
$
901
$
880
171
145
129
100
81
64
(126
)
61
7
117
128
41
(38
)
(39
)
36
(223
)
(82
)
105
(223
)
11
(189
)
48
76
79
(112
)
44
(60
)
256
(99
)
64
(95
)
(11
)
1,103
1,071
1,016
(1,451
)
(71
)
(1,090
)
(45
)
(23
)
(37
)
42
29
91
(356
)
(288
)
(197
)
96
33
18
(32
)
(9
)
(8
)
(1,746
)
(329
)
(1,223
)
825
(508
)
844
500
(20
)
(18
)
(59
)
(133
)
(10
)
(374
)
(219
)
(202
)
(136
)
(113
)
(208
)
(59
)
68
111
51
908
(835
)
267
265
(93
)
60
177
270
210
$
442
$
177
$
270
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
30 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Retained
Comprehensive
(Dollars in millions, except share amounts)
Shares
Par
Surplus
Earnings
Shares
Amount
Income
241,348,865
$
241
$
243
$
2,639
(42,081,130
)
$
(706
)
880
$
880
(156
)
864,252
32
2,158,056
34
29
(1,272,800
)
(58
)
(19,100
)
(1
)
15,424
(2
)
5
240,940,317
241
246
3,363
(39,926,750
)
(673
)
$
883
901
$
901
(205
)
97
3,542,282
48
35
(4,054,200
)
(208
)
1
2
(21
)
240,940,317
241
378
4,059
(40,438,668
)
(833
)
$
883
943
$
943
(224
)
54
1,710,198
16
21
(1,466,300
)
(113
)
11
240,940,317
$
241
$
453
$
4,778
(40,194,770
)
$
(930
)
$
954
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization.
The companys businesses include information and communications
technology, land and amphibious combat systems, naval and commercial
shipbuilding, and business aviation. The company also owns a coal mining
operation, an aggregates operation and a leasing operation for liquefied
natural gas (LNG) tankers. The companys primary customers are the U.S.
military, other government organizations, the armed forces of allied nations,
and a diverse base of corporate and industrial buyers.
Basis of Consolidation and Use of Estimates.
The Consolidated Financial
Statements include the accounts of all wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
these estimates.
Revenue Recognition.
Sales and earnings under long-term defense contracts
and programs are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method of
accounting. The company uses estimated earnings rates on similar, economically
interdependent contracts to develop program earnings rates for contracts that
meet Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, criteria. Earnings
rates are applied to all contract costs, including general and administrative
expenses, to determine sales and operating earnings. Earnings rates are
reviewed periodically to assess revisions in contract values and estimated
costs at completion. Based on these assessments, any changes in earnings rates
are made prospectively.
Any anticipated losses on defense contracts and programs are charged to
earnings when identified. Such losses encompass all costs, including general
and administrative expenses, allocable to the contracts. Revenue arising from a
claims process is not recognized either as income or as an offset against a
potential loss until the claim can be reliably estimated and its realization is
probable.
Contracts for aircraft certified by the Federal Aviation Authority are
accounted for in accordance with Statement of Position 81-1. These contracts
usually provide for two major milestones, the manufacture of the green
aircraft and its completion, which includes exterior painting and installation
of customer-selected interiors and optional avionics. Revenues are initially
recorded when green aircraft are delivered to the customer and subsequently
when the customer accepts final delivery of the fully outfitted aircraft. Sales
of all other aircraft products and services are recognized when delivered or
the service is performed.
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses
were $823, $647 and $570 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, and are included
in operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.
Interest Expense, Net.
Interest expense was $68, $72 and $53 in 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively. Interest payments, including interest on finance
operations debt, were $70, $78 and $52 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Cash and Equivalents and Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
The
company classifies its securities in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities. The company considers securities with a maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The company adjusts all
investments in debt and equity securities to fair value. Market adjustments are
recognized in the statement of earnings for trading securities and are included
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income for available-for-sale
securities. The company had $47 and $43 in available-for-sale investments at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The company had no investments
classified as trading securities at the end of either period.
Accounts Receivable and Contracts in Process.
Accounts receivable
represent only amounts billed and currently due from customers. Recoverable
costs and accrued profit related to long-term defense contracts and programs on
which revenue has been recognized, but billings have not yet been presented to
the customer (unbilled receivables), are included in contracts in process.
Inventories.
Work in process inventories represent aircraft components and
are stated at the lower of cost (based on estimated average unit cost of the
number of units in a production lot, or specific identification) or
market. Raw materials are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
method) or market. Pre-owned aircraft acquired in connection with the sale of
new aircraft are recorded at the lower of the trade-in value (determined at the
time of trade and based on estimated fair value) or estimated net realizable
value.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net.
Property, plant and equipment is
carried at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization. Most of the companys assets are depreciated using accelerated
methods, with the remainder using the straight-line method. Buildings and
improvements are depreciated over periods up to 50 years. Machinery and
equipment is depreciated
32 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
over periods up to 28 years. Depletion of mineral reserves is computed
using the units-of-production method.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.
Long-lived assets, identifiable
intangibles and goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable. The company assesses the recoverability of the cost of the asset
based on a review of projected undiscounted cash flows. In the event an
impairment loss is identified, it is recognized based on the amount by which
the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset. If
an asset is held for sale, the company reviews its estimated fair value less
cost to sell. The company will change its accounting for the impairment of
long-lived assets beginning in 2002. See New Accounting Standards discussion
for further details.
Environmental Liabilities.
The company accrues environmental costs when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably
estimated. Cleanup and other environmental exit costs related to sold
businesses were recorded at the time of disposal. Recorded liabilities have not
been discounted. To the extent the U.S. government has specifically agreed to
pay the ongoing maintenance and monitoring costs at sites currently used in the
conduct of the companys government contracting business, these costs are
treated as contract costs and recognized as paid.
Stock-Based Compensation.
The company measures compensation cost for stock
options as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the companys
stock at the measurement date over the exercise price. Stock awards are
recorded at fair value at the date of award.
Translation of Foreign Currencies.
Local currencies have been determined
to be functional currencies for the companys international operations. Foreign
currency balance sheets are translated at the end-of-period exchange rates and
earnings statements at the average exchange rates for each period. The
resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are included in the
calculation of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in
shareholders equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
The company adopted SFAS
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended
by SFAS 137 and 138, on January 1, 2001. SFAS 133 requires that all derivative
instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or
other comprehensive income based on the guidelines stipulated in SFAS 133. The
adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the companys
results of operations or financial condition.
New Accounting Standards.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, on October 3, 2001 and SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, on August 16, 2001. SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets to
be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair
value less cost to sell, including discontinued operations. The statement also
broadens the definition of discontinued operations. SFAS 143 requires companies
to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in
the period in which it is incurred, and capitalize the cost by increasing the
carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The company is required to
adopt SFAS 144 during the first quarter of 2002 and SFAS 143 on January 1,
2003. The company does not expect the adoption of the standards to have a
material impact on the companys results of operations or financial condition.
The FASB issued SFAS 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, on June 30, 2001. SFAS 141 requires all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, to be accounted for using the
purchase method. The provisions of SFAS 142 eliminate amortization of goodwill
and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives, and require an
impairment assessment at least annually by applying a fair-value-based test.
The company is required to adopt SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. The company
anticipates an annual increase to net earnings of approximately $45, or $.22
per diluted share, from the elimination of goodwill amortization. Management
does not expect the other provisions of the statements to have a material
impact on the companys results of operations or financial condition.
Classification.
Consistent with defense industry practice, the company
classifies assets and liabilities related to long-term production contracts as
current although a portion of these amounts is not expected to be realized
within one year. In addition, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified
to conform to the current year presentation.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 33
B. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Pooling of Interests Method
On July 30, 1999, the company acquired Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
(Gulfstream), in a one-for-one common stock share exchange. Gulfstream is a
leading designer, developer, manufacturer, marketer and service provider of
technologically advanced business jet aircraft. The acquisition was accounted
for as a pooling of interests. Accordingly, periods prior to the combination
include the accounts and results of operations of Gulfstream.
Purchase Method
On September 28, 2001, the company acquired Integrated Information Systems
Group from Motorola, Inc. for $825 in cash. The company financed the
acquisition by issuing commercial paper. Renamed General Dynamics Decision
Systems (Decision Systems), this business provides technologies, products and
systems for information assurance, communications and situational awareness
markets in the U.S. and abroad. Decision Systems is part of the Information
Systems and Technology business group.
On July 25,
2001, the company acquired Empresa Nacional Santa Bárbara de
Industrias Militares, S.A., of Madrid, Spain, and Santa Bárbara Blindados,
S.A., of Seville. The new combined entity, renamed Santa Bárbara Sistemas,
S.A., produces combat vehicles and munitions. Santa Bárbara Sistemas is part of
the Combat Systems business group.
On June 5, 2001, the company acquired substantially all of the assets of
Galaxy Aerospace Company LP for $330 in cash, after a purchase price adjustment
received during the first quarter of 2002. The company financed the acquisition
by issuing commercial paper. The selling parties may receive additional
payments, up to a maximum of approximately $300 through 2006, contingent on the
achievement of specific revenue targets. The acquired operation designs and
manufactures the mid-size Gulfstream 100 and the super mid-size Gulfstream 200.
On January 26, 2001, the company acquired Primex Technologies, Inc. for
$334 in cash, plus the assumption of $204 in outstanding debt, $149 of which
was repaid at the time of the acquisition. The company financed the acquisition
by issuing commercial paper. Renamed General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical
Systems, Inc., this business provides medium- and large-caliber ammunition,
propellants, satellite propulsion systems and electronics products to the U.S.
and its allies, as well as domestic and international industrial customers.
Ordnance and Tactical Systems is part of the Combat Systems business group.
On September 1, 1999, the company acquired three business units comprising
Government Systems Corporation from GTE Corporation for $1.01 billion in cash.
The company financed the acquisition by issuing commercial paper. Government
Systems Corporation is a leader in the advancement of C4ISR (command and
control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance); electronic defense systems; communication switching; and
information systems for defense, government and industry in the U.S. and
abroad. Government Systems Corporation is part of the Information Systems and
Technology business group.
The purchase prices of the above acquisitions have been allocated to the
estimated fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired, with any
excess recorded as goodwill (see Note H). Certain of the estimates related to
Decision Systems, Santa Bárbara Sistemas and the Galaxy Aerospace acquisition
are still preliminary at December 31, 2001, but will be finalized within one
year from their respective dates of acquisition. The operating results of the
acquired businesses have been included with those of the company from their
respective closing dates.
C. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were as follows
(in thousands):
34 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
D. INCOME TAXES
The net provision for income taxes included on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings is summarized as follows:
The provision for state and local income taxes that is allocable to U.S.
government contracts is included in operating costs and expenses on the
Consolidated Statement of Earnings and therefore not included in the provision
above.
During the first quarter of 2001, the company reduced its liabilities for
tax contingencies. The company recognized a non-cash benefit of $28, or $.14
per share, as a result of this adjustment.
During the third quarter of 2000, the company and the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) settled outstanding tax issues, including the companys remaining
refund claim for research and experimentation tax credits, for the years 1990
through 1993. The company recognized a benefit of $90, or $.45 per share, as a
result of this settlement. During the first quarter of 1999, the company and
the IRS settled outstanding tax issues, including refund claims for research
and experimentation tax credits, for the years 1981 through 1989 for
approximately $334 (including before-tax interest). The company recognized a
benefit of $165 (net of amounts previously recorded in 1991 and 1992), or $.82
per diluted share, as a result of this settlement.
During the first quarter of 2000, all matters related to Gulfstreams
consolidated federal income tax returns for the years up to and including 1994
were resolved with no material impact on the companys results of operations or
financial condition.
The reconciliation from the statutory federal income tax rate to the
companys effective income tax rate is as follows:
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
The Capital Construction Fund (CCF) is a program established by the U.S.
government and administered by the Maritime Administration. The purpose of the
program is to support the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or
operation of U.S. flag merchant marine vessels. It provides for the deferral of
federal and state income taxes on earnings derived from eligible programs as
long as the
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 35
funds are deposited and used for qualified activities. Unqualified
withdrawals are subject to taxation plus interest. The CCF must be
collateralized by qualified assets defined by the Maritime Administration. At
December 31, 2001, the company had assigned approximately $160 in U.S.
government accounts receivable to the CCF.
Based on the level of projected earnings and current backlog, no material
valuation allowance was required for the companys deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2001 and 2000. The current portion of the net deferred tax asset
was $331 and $318 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and is included
in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Income tax payments were $326, $281 and $303 in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively, and included federal, foreign and state taxes.
The IRS has completed its examination of the companys 1994 and 1995
income tax returns. The company has protested certain issues raised during the
1994 and 1995 examination to the IRS Appeals Division. The IRS has commenced
its examination of the companys 1996 through 1998 income tax returns. On
November 27, 2001, the company filed a refund suit, titled
General Dynamics v.
United States
, for the years 1991 to 1993 in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
The suit seeks recovery of refund claims that were disallowed by the IRS at the
administrative level. If the court awards a full recovery to the company, the
refund could exceed $100 (including after-tax interest). The litigation is
expected to take several years to resolve. The company has recognized no income
from this matter.
The company has recorded liabilities for tax contingencies for open years.
Resolution of tax matters for these years is not expected to have a material
impact on the companys results of operations or financial condition.
E. CONTRACTS IN PROCESS
Contracts in process primarily represent costs and accrued profit related to
defense contracts and programs, and consisted of the following:
Contract costs include production costs and related overhead, such as general
and administrative expenses. Other contract costs primarily represent amounts
required to be recorded under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States that are not currently allocable to contracts, such as a portion
of the companys estimated workers compensation, other insurance-related
assessments, retirement benefits and environmental expenses. Recovery of these
costs under contracts is considered probable based on the companys backlog. If
the level of backlog in the future does not support the continued deferral of
these costs, the profitability of the companys remaining contracts could be
affected.
F. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted primarily of commercial aircraft components, as follows:
Other inventories consisted primarily of coal and aggregates, which are stated
at the lower of average cost or estimated net realizable value.
36 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
G. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
The major classes of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
Certain of the companys plant facilities are provided by the U.S. government
and therefore are not included above.
H. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL, NET
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
Intangible assets were shown net of accumulated amortization of $172 and $139
at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Contract and program intangibles
are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 25 to 40
years. Other intangible assets consisted primarily of aircraft product design,
licenses, customer lists and workforce. These other intangible assets are
amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 21 years. Other also included
approximately $20 in trademarks with an indefinite life.
Goodwill resulted from the companys business acquisitions. Goodwill
acquired prior to July 1, 2001, is amortized on a straight-line basis primarily
over 40 years and was shown net of accumulated amortization of $198 and $131 at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. As of December 31, 2001,
approximately $650 of goodwill related to Decision Systems was not subject to
amortization.
I. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities consisted of the following:
Other consisted primarily of contract-related costs assumed in business
acquisitions, dividends payable, environmental remediation reserves, warranty
reserves and the current portion of the companys finance operation debt (see
Note M).
J. DEBT
Debt (excluding finance operation discussed in Note M) consisted of the
following:
As of December 31, 2001, the company had $1,167 par value discounted commercial
paper outstanding at an average yield of approximately 2.06 percent with an
average term of approximately 39 days. During 2001, the company secured two new
committed lines of credit totaling $2 billion, split evenly between a
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 37
364-day and a 5-year term facility. Both facilities back the commercial paper
program and replace the companys previous lines of credit, which totaled $1.4
billion.
On August 27, 2001, the company issued $500 of three-year floating rate
notes due September 1, 2004. Interest on the notes resets quarterly at
three-month LIBOR plus 0.22 percent, and is payable each March, June, September
and December. The notes had an average interest rate of 3.42 percent for the
year ended December 31, 2001. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at
any time after September 1, 2002, and prior to their maturity at 100 percent of
the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus any accrued but unpaid
interest on the date the notes are redeemed. On February 8, 2002, the company
commenced an offer to exchange all original outstanding floating rate notes due
2004 for an equal principal amount of floating rate exchange notes that have
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The exchange
offer expired on March 11, 2002. The terms of the exchange notes are
substantially identical to the outstanding notes, except that the exchange
notes are freely tradable. These floating rate notes are guaranteed by certain
of the companys subsidiaries. See Note U for condensed consolidating financial
statements.
The senior notes are privately placed U.S. dollar denominated notes held
by one of the companys Canadian subsidiaries. Interest is payable
semi-annually at an annual rate of 6.32 percent, until maturity in September
2008. The subsidiary has a currency swap, which fixes its foreign currency
variability on both the principal and interest components of these notes. See
Note N for fair value discussion of the currency swap.
The term debt was assumed in connection with the companys acquisition of
Primex Technologies, Inc. Sinking fund payments of $5 are required in December
of each of the years 2002 through 2007, with the remaining $20 payable in
December 2008. Interest is payable in June and December at the rate of 7.5
percent annually.
The industrial development bonds are due December 1, 2002, and bear
interest at 6.6 percent per annum with interest payable semi-annually.
At December 31, 2001, other consisted of $24 drawn under a bank line of
credit, a $16 note payable to a Spanish government entity and three capital
lease arrangements totaling $15. Annual principal payments on the note payable
are $2 in both 2002 and 2003, $10 in 2004, $1 in 2005, with the balance due in
2006. Interest is payable each December at the rate of 3.85 percent annually.
The capital leases extend through 2010.
K. OTHER LIABILITIES
Other liabilities consisted of the following:
The company has recorded liabilities for contingencies related to disposed
businesses. These liabilities include postretirement benefits, environmental,
legal and other costs.
The company has certain liabilities that are specific to the coal mining
industry, including workers compensation and reclamation. The company is
subject to the Federal Coal Mine Health & Safety Act of 1969, as amended, and
the related workers compensation laws in the states in which it has operated.
These laws require the company to pay benefits for occupational disability
resulting from coal workers pneumoconiosis (black lung). The liability for
known claims and an actuarially determined estimate of future claims that will
be awarded to current and former employees is discounted based on an
appropriate discount rate. Liabilities to reclaim land disturbed by the mining
process and to perform other closing functions are recorded over the estimated
production lives of the mines.
Other consisted primarily of liabilities for tax contingencies for open
years, warranty reserves, long-term debt for the companys finance operation
(see Note M), and workers compensation.
38 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
L. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Authorized Stock.
On July 30, 1999, the companys shareholders approved an
amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of common stock from 200 million shares to 300 million shares
of $1 par value common stock. Other authorized capital stock of the company
consists of 50 million shares of $1 par value preferred stock issuable in
series, with the rights, preferences and limitations of each series to be
determined by the board of directors.
Dividends per Share.
Dividends per share were $1.12, $1.04 and $.96 in
2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Shares Outstanding.
The company had 200,745,547, 200,501,649 and
201,013,567 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively. No shares of the companys preferred stock are
currently outstanding.
M. FINANCE OPERATION
The company owns three LNG tankers, which are leased to a nonrelated company.
The leases are financed by privately-placed bonds, which are secured by the LNG
tankers. The bonds are callable under certain conditions and are nonrecourse to
the company. Accordingly, the company is not obligated to repay the debt in the
event the lessee defaults on the lease payments. Outstanding debt was $43 and
$63 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Principal payments on the debt
are made semi-annually and are scheduled as follows, $23 in 2002, $17 in 2003,
and $3 at maturity in 2004. The weighted average interest rate on the debt is
6.2 percent.
The leases are classified as direct financing leases and extend through
2009. The components of the companys net investment in the leases receivable
were as follows:
The company is scheduled to receive minimum lease payments of $31 in both 2002
and 2003, $24 in 2004 and $21 in 2005 and 2006.
N. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of the companys financial instruments approximates
carrying value. Fair value is generally based on quoted market prices, except
the finance operation debt, where fair value is based on risk-adjusted discount
rates.
The companys operations attempt to minimize the effects of currency risk
by borrowing externally in the local currency or by hedging their purchases
made in foreign currencies, when practical. The company is exposed to the
effects of foreign currency fluctuations on the U.S. dollar value of earnings
from its international operations. As a matter of policy, the company does not
engage in currency speculation. The company periodically enters into foreign
currency derivatives, including forward exchange and currency swap contracts,
to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
As of December 31, 2001, the companys sole cash flow hedge was the
currency swap discussed in Note J. Fair value of this currency swap was an $11
asset, which offset the effect of changes in the currency exchange rate on the
related debt. There were no material derivative instruments designated as fair
value or net investment hedges during the year ended December 31, 2001.
O. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The company is subject to litigation and other legal proceedings arising out of
the ordinary course of its business or arising under provisions relating to the
protection of the environment. Claims made by and against the company regarding
the development of the Navys A-12 aircraft are discussed in Note P.
On May 7, 1999, a whistleblower suit was filed under seal against the
company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South
Carolina. The plaintiff alleges that the company violated the False Claims Act,
by omitting certain facts when it testified before Congress in 1995 concerning
funding for the third
Seawolf
-attack submarine. The plaintiff seeks damages in
the amount of the contract award for the third
Seawolf
, subject to trebling
under the False Claims Act. The Department of Justice declined to intervene in
the case on the plaintiffs behalf and the suit was unsealed in December 2000.
The complaint has been removed to the United States District Court for the
District of South Carolina.
The Court has directed discovery on the issue of whether the alleged
omissions by the company were material to the governments decision to award
the third
Seawolf
to the company. The parties filed motions
on this issue on March 15, 2002. The company believes that it has
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 39
substantial legal and factual arguments that will result in either the
dismissal of the case or a judgment in the companys favor.
Various claims and other legal proceedings generally incidental to the
normal course of business are pending or threatened against the company. While
the company cannot predict the outcome of these matters, the company believes
its potential liabilities in these proceedings, individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material impact on the companys results of
operations or financial condition.
Minimum Lease Payments
Total rental expense under operating leases was $111, $71 and $62 for 2001,
2000 and 1999, respectively. Future minimum lease payments due during the next
five years are as follows:
Operating leases are primarily for facilities and equipment. In addition, the
company has significant operating lease obligations related to its underwater
fiber-optic cable installation business. At December 31, 2001, the company had
leased four ships with expiration dates through 2006.
Other
In the ordinary course of business, the company has entered into letters of
credit and other similar arrangements with financial institutions and insurance
carriers aggregating approximately $880 at December 31, 2001. The company was
contingently liable for certain other guarantees totaling approximately $65 at
December 31, 2001. The company knows of no event of default that would require
it to satisfy these guarantees.
The company has agreements with certain of its suppliers to procure major
aircraft components such as engines, wings and avionics. These supplier
agreements vary in length from three to six years and generally provide for
price and quantity of components to be supplied. In connection with the
Gulfstream 100/200 and Gulfstream V/V-SP programs, the company has entered into
revenue sharing agreements with three suppliers. Under the terms of these
agreements, the suppliers are required to design, manufacture and supply
certain aircraft components, including the fuselage for the Gulfstream 100/200
aircraft, in exchange for a fixed percentage of the revenues associated with
such aircraft. Payments to the suppliers are made generally on a pro rata basis
concurrent with the associated customer deposits received on the aircraft sales
agreements.
As of December 31, 2001, in connection with orders for eleven Gulfstream
V-SP and two Gulfstream 200 aircraft in firm contracts backlog, the company had
offered customers trade-in options, which may or may not be exercised by the
customers. Under these options, if exercised, the company will accept trade-in
aircraft, primarily Gulfstream IVs/IV-SPs and Gulfstream Vs, at a guaranteed
minimum trade-in price. Management believes that the fair market value of all
such aircraft equals or exceeds the specified trade-in values.
P. TERMINATION OF A-12 PROGRAM
In January 1991, the Navy terminated the companys A-12 aircraft contract for
default. The A-12 contract was a fixed-price incentive contract for the
full-scale development and initial production of the Navys new carrier-based
Advanced Tactical Aircraft. Both the company and McDonnell Douglas, now owned
by the Boeing Company, (the contractors) were parties to the contract with the
Navy, each had full responsibility to the Navy for performance under the
contract, and both are jointly and severally liable for potential liabilities
arising from the termination. As a consequence of the termination for default,
the Navy demanded that the contractors repay $1,352 in unliquidated progress
payments, but agreed to defer collection of the amount pending a decision by
the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on the contractors challenge to the
termination for default, or a negotiated settlement.
The contractors filed a complaint on June 7, 1991, in the U.S. Court of
Federal Claims contesting the default termination. In December 1994, the court
issued an order vacating the termination for default. On December 19, 1995,
following further proceedings, the court issued an order converting the
termination for default to a termination for convenience. On March 31, 1998, a
final judgment was entered in favor of the contractors for $1,200 plus
interest.
On July 1, 1999, the Court of Appeals found that the Trial Court erred in
converting the termination for default to a termination for convenience without
first determining whether a default existed. The Court of Appeals remanded the
case for determination of whether the governments default termination was
justified. On August 31, 2001, following the trial on remand, the Trial Court
issued an
40 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
opinion upholding the default termination of the A-12 contract. In its
opinion, the Trial Court rejected all of the governments arguments to sustain
the default termination except for one, schedule. With respect to the
governments schedule arguments, the Trial Court held that the schedule the
government unilaterally imposed was reasonable and enforceable, and that the
government had not waived that schedule. On the sole ground that the
contractors were not going to deliver the first aircraft on the date provided
in the unilateral schedule, the Trial Court upheld the default termination and
entered judgment for the government.
The contractors filed post-trial motions seeking reconsideration by the
Trial Court of its opinion and judgment. On October 4, 2001, the Trial Court
denied the contractors post-trial motions. On November 30, 2001, the company
filed its notice of appeal.
The company continues to believe strongly in the merits of its case. The
company believes that in concluding to the contrary on remand, the Trial Court
applied incorrect legal standards and otherwise erred as a matter of law. The
company believes that it has substantial arguments on appeal to persuade the
Court of Appeals to reverse the Trial Courts judgment. The contractors have
asked the Navy to confirm the deferral of payment through the pendency of the
appeal. The contractors and the Navy have not yet reached an agreement with
respect to this request.
If, contrary to the companys expectations, the default termination is
sustained on appeal, the contractors could be required to repay the
government as much as $1,352 for progress payments received for the A-12
contract plus interest (approximately $970 at December 31, 2001). In this
outcome, the government contends the companys liability would be approximately
$1.2 billion pretax, $625 after-tax to be taken as a charge against
discontinued operations. The company has sufficient resources to pay such an
obligation if required.
Q. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
Under the 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan, awards may be granted in cash,
common stock, options to purchase common stock, restricted shares of common
stock, or any combination of these. Awards of stock options and restricted
stock are intended to qualify as deductible, performance-based compensation
under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code). Incentive Compensation Plan awards of cash and unrestricted stock are
not designed to be deductible by the company under Section 162(m).
Stock options may be granted either as incentive stock options, intended
to qualify under Section 422 of the Code, or as options not qualified under the
Code. All options are issued with an exercise price at or above 100 percent of
the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options granted
under Gulfstreams incentive compensation plans prior to the acquisition were
subject to different vesting periods based on the terms of the plans. At the
time of the acquisition, substantially all of the outstanding Gulfstream
options became fully vested.
A grant of restricted shares pursuant to the Incentive Compensation Plan
is a transfer of shares of common stock, for such consideration and subject to
such restrictions, if any, on transfer or other incidents of ownership, for
such periods of time as the Compensation Committee (or subcommittee thereof)
may determine. Until the end of the applicable period of restriction, the
restricted shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise
alienated or hypothecated. However, during the period of restriction, the
recipient of restricted shares will be entitled to vote the restricted shares
and to retain cash dividends paid thereon. Awards of restricted shares may be
granted pursuant to a performance formula whereby the number of shares
initially granted increases or decreases based on the increase or decrease in
the price of the common stock over a performance period.
Information with respect to restricted stock awards was as follows:
There were 1,372,394 shares of restricted stock outstanding at December 31,
2001.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 41
Information with respect to stock options was as follows:
Information with respect to stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2001, was as follows:
At December 31, 2001, in addition to the shares reserved for issuance on the
exercise of options outstanding, 9,726,157 treasury shares have been reserved
for options that may be granted in the future.
Had compensation cost for stock options been determined based on the fair
value at the grant dates for awards under the companys incentive compensation
plans, the companys net earnings and net earnings per share would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows:
The compensation cost calculated under the fair value approach shown above is
recognized over the vesting period of the stock options. Fair value is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following assumptions for all years presented: (1) expected dividend
yields from 1.3 to 1.8 percent, (2) expected volatility from 17.8 to 30.8
percent, (3) risk-free interest rates from 4.7 to 6.7 percent and (4) expected
lives from 30 months to 54 months.
42 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
R. RETIREMENT PLANS
The company provides defined pension and other postretirement benefits to
certain eligible employees. The following is a reconciliation of the benefit
obligations, plan/trust assets, and funded status of the companys plans:
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 43
Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs included the following:
Pension Benefits.
As of December 31, 2001, the company had 12 trusteed,
noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension plans covering substantially
all of its government business employees and two plans covering substantially
all of its commercial business employees. Under certain plans, benefits are a
function primarily of both the employees years of service and level of
compensation, while under other plans, benefits are a function primarily of
years of service.
It is the companys policy to fund the plans to the maximum extent
deductible under existing federal income tax regulations. Such contributions
are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date,
but also for benefits to be earned in the future.
Changes in prior service cost resulting from plan amendments are amortized
on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees
expected to receive benefits under the plan.
The companys contractual arrangements with the U.S. government provide
for the recovery of contributions to the companys government plans. The amount
contributed to certain plans, charged to contracts and included in net sales
has exceeded the net periodic pension cost as determined under SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions. The company has deferred recognition of
earnings resulting from this difference to provide a better matching of
revenues and expenses. Similarly, pension settlements and curtailments under
the
44 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
government plans have also been deferred. The aforementioned deferrals
have been classified against the prepaid pension cost related to these plans.
The company historically had deferred certain gains realized by its
commercial pension plan for the purpose of offsetting any costs associated with
its final disposition. In connection with the 1999 acquisition of Gulfstream,
the company merged the Gulfstream commercial pension plan with its own. As a
result of the merger of these plans, in 1999 the company recognized previously
deferred gains on its commercial plan, totaling $126 (before-tax), which is
included in operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statement of
Earnings. The companys commercial plans net prepaid pension cost of $293 and
$268 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, is included in other
noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
At December 31, 2001, approximately 60 percent of the plans assets were
invested in diversified U.S. common stocks including futures contracts, 16
percent in mortgage-backed securities, 14 percent in diversified U.S. corporate
debt securities and 10 percent in securities of the U.S. government or its
agencies.
In addition to the qualified defined benefit plans, the company provides
eligible employees the opportunity to participate in defined contribution
savings plans, which permit contributions on both a pretax and after-tax basis.
Generally, salaried employees and certain hourly employees are eligible to
participate upon commencement of employment with the company. Under most plans,
the employee may contribute to various investment alternatives, including
investment in the companys common stock. In certain plans, the company matches
a portion of the employees contributions with contributions to a fund, which
invests in the companys common stock. The companys contributions to the
defined contribution plans totaled $64, $57 and $46 in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Approximately 15 million shares of the companys common stock
were held by the defined contribution plans at both December 31, 2001 and 2000.
The company also sponsors several unfunded non-qualified supplemental
executive plans, which provide participants with additional benefits, including
any excess of such benefits over limits imposed on qualified plans by federal
law. The recorded liability and expense related to these plans are not material
to the companys results of operations or financial condition.
Other Postretirement Benefits.
The company maintains plans providing
postretirement health care coverage for many of its current and former
employees and postretirement life insurance benefits for certain retirees.
These benefits vary by employment status, age, service and salary level at
retirement. The coverage provided and the extent to which the retirees share in
the cost of the program vary throughout the company. Both health and life
insurance benefits are provided only to those employees who retire directly
from the service of the company and not to those who terminate
service/seniority prior to eligibility for retirement.
The company maintains several Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association
(VEBA) trusts for certain plans. It is the companys policy to fund the VEBAs
in accordance with existing federal income tax regulations.
At December 31, 2001, the majority of the VEBA trusts assets were
invested in diversified U.S. common stocks, U.S. fixed income securities and
bank notes.
For non-funded plans, claims are paid as received.
The health care cost trend rates are assumed to decline gradually to 4.75
percent for post-65 and pre-65 claim groups in the year 2003, and thereafter
over the projected payout period of the benefits. Assumed health care cost
trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health
care plans. The effect of a one-percentage point increase or decrease in the
assumed health care cost trend rate on the total service and interest cost is
$5 and $(5), respectively, and the effect on the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation is $62 and $(62), respectively.
The companys contractual arrangements with the U.S. government provide
for the recovery of contributions to a VEBA, and for non-funded plans recovery
of claims paid. The net periodic postretirement benefit cost exceeds the
companys cost currently allocable to contracts. To the extent recovery of the
cost is considered probable based on the companys backlog, the company defers
the excess in contracts in process until such time that the cost is allocable
to contracts.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 45
S. BUSINESS GROUP INFORMATION
Management has chosen to organize and measure its business groups in accordance
with the nature of products and services offered. Management measures
its groups profit based on operating earnings. As a result, net interest,
other income and expense items and income taxes have not been allocated to the
companys business groups.
Summary financial information for each of the companys business groups
follows:
46 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
The following table presents revenues by geographic area (based on the location
of the companys customers):
T. QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly data is based on a 13 week period.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 47
U. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The floating rate notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an
unsecured, joint and several basis by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of
General Dynamics Corporation (the Guarantors). The following condensed
consolidating financial statements illustrate the composition of the parent,
the Guarantors on a combined basis (each Guarantor together with its
majority-owned subsidiaries) and all other subsidiaries on a combined basis as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000 for the balance sheet, as well as the statement
of earnings and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
48 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 49
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
50 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
To the Shareholders of General Dynamics Corporation:
The management of General Dynamics Corporation is responsible for the
consolidated financial statements and all related financial information
contained in this report. The financial statements, which include amounts based
on estimates and judgments, have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States applied on a consistent
basis.
The company maintains a system of internal accounting controls designed
and intended to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, that
transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with managements
authorization and that accountability for assets is maintained. An environment
that establishes an appropriate level of control consciousness is maintained
and monitored by management. An important element of the monitoring process is
an internal audit program that independently assesses the effectiveness of the
control environment.
The Audit and Corporate Responsibility Committee of the board of
directors, which is composed of four outside directors, meets periodically and,
when appropriate, separately with the independent public accountants,
management and internal audit to review the activities of each.
The financial statements have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP,
independent public accountants, whose report follows.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To General Dynamics Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet of General
Dynamics Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2001 and 2000, and the related Consolidated Statements of Earnings,
Shareholders Equity and Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of General Dynamics
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The condensed consolidating financial
statements provided in Note U are presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and are not part of the basic
financial statements. These condensed consolidating financial statements have
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly state in all material respects
the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.
General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report 51
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents summary selected historical financial data derived
from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and other information of the
company for each of the five years presented. The following information should
be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Results
of Operations and Financial Condition and the audited Consolidated Financial
Statements and related Notes thereto.
52 General Dynamics 2001 Annual Report
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
201,142
199,840
199,988
1,608
1,200
1,945
157
222
124
202,907
201,262
202,057
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
374
$
300
$
344
16
18
18
2
5
8
392
323
370
118
134
51
(1
)
(5
)
(11
)
(1
)
1
117
128
41
(28
)
(90
)
(165
)
$
481
$
361
$
246
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
35.0
%
35.0
%
35.0
%
(2.0
)
(7.1
)
(14.7
)
1.1
1.0
0.9
(0.3
)
(0.3
)
0.6
33.8
%
28.6
%
21.8
%
December 31
2001
2000
$
98
$
97
90
95
30
41
35
24
25
366
247
$
608
$
540
$
124
$
105
103
93
52
57
78
47
63
47
45
28
$
465
$
377
$
143
$
163
December 31
2001
2000
$
13,481
$
10,798
731
718
14,212
11,516
12,475
10,278
$
1,737
$
1,238
December 31
2001
2000
$
643
$
405
361
289
254
236
31
23
$
1,289
$
953
December 31
2001
2000
$
159
$
123
76
69
1,090
607
2,065
1,568
148
273
3,538
2,640
1,770
1,346
$
1,768
$
1,294
December 31
2001
2000
$
465
$
446
183
82
$
648
$
528
December 31
2001
2000
$
473
$
454
407
43
358
518
264
253
225
182
737
394
$
2,464
$
1,844
December 31
2001
2000
$
1,165
$
340
500
150
150
50
15
15
55
8
1,935
513
1,211
340
$
724
$
173
December 31
2001
2000
$
340
$
324
215
169
100
48
85
116
71
73
427
363
$
1,238
$
1,093
December 31
2001
2000
$
195
$
225
38
38
(79
)
(95
)
$
154
$
168
$
105
90
84
73
45
169
$
566
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
340,888
385,023
540,661
$
71.39
$
44.15
$
60.15
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
6,573,599
7,502,881
8,672,328
2,418,080
2,961,050
1,666,720
(1,766,787
)
(3,669,070
)
(2,622,081
)
(158,779
)
(221,262
)
(214,086
)
7,066,113
6,573,599
7,502,881
3,237,568
3,023,399
5,419,012
$
44.57
$
39.82
$
30.35
72.18
43.17
59.62
42.61
33.11
20.64
53.29
54.76
49.23
54.31
44.57
39.82
46.02
42.45
34.16
Options Outstanding
Number
Weighted
Weighted
Range of
Outstanding
Average Remaining
Average
Exercise Prices
at 12/31/01
Contractual Life
Exercise Price
90,532
1.87
years
$
4.54
344,503
0.22
32.91
3,151,779
2.75
42.88
916,926
2.48
57.97
2,562,373
4.05
71.70
7,066,113
Options Exercisable
Number
Weighted
Range of
Exercisable
Average
Exercise Prices
at 12/31/01
Exercise Price
90,532
$
4.54
344,503
32.91
1,797,412
43.00
866,193
58.23
138,928
68.07
3,237,568
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
Net Earnings:
As reported
$
943
$
901
$
880
Pro forma
921
886
853
Net Earnings Per
ShareBasic:
As reported
$
4.69
$
4.51
$
4.40
Pro forma
4.58
4.43
4.27
Net Earnings Per
ShareDiluted:
As reported
$
4.65
$
4.48
$
4.36
Pro forma
4.54
4.40
4.22
Weighted average fair
value of options granted
$
17.67
$
10.20
$
8.74
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2001
2000
2001
2000
$
(4,579
)
$
(4,393
)
$
(835
)
$
(778
)
(130
)
(121
)
(11
)
(10
)
(338
)
(322
)
(62
)
(56
)
(24
)
(32
)
(56
)
(156
)
49
(65
)
(53
)
(195
)
(6
)
(25
)
(2
)
260
246
70
64
$
(5,162
)
$
(4,579
)
$
(984
)
$
(835
)
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2001
2000
2001
2000
$
6,165
$
5,722
$
349
$
366
80
695
(16
)
134
10
1
6
20
18
(13
)
(12
)
(260
)
(246
)
(39
)
(35
)
$
6,107
$
6,165
$
324
$
349
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2001
2000
2001
2000
$
945
$
1,586
$
(660
)
$
(486
)
(682
)
(1,285
)
37
(72
)
242
252
47
(11
)
(2
)
(9
)
34
45
$
503
$
544
$
(542
)
$
(524
)
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2001
2000
1999
2001
2000
1999
7.25
%
7.50
%
7.50
%
7.25
%
7.50
%
7.50
%
4.00-11.00
%
4.00-11.00
%
4.00-11.00
%
8.16
%
8.31
%
8.31
%
8.00
%
8.00
%
8.00
%
4.75
%
5.75
%
6.75
%
4.75
%
5.75
%
6.75
%
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2001
2000
1999
2001
2000
1999
$
130
$
121
$
112
$
11
$
10
$
10
338
322
281
62
56
51
(486
)
(445
)
(397
)
(25
)
(24
)
(19
)
(41
)
(33
)
(8
)
(3
)
(11
)
(1
)
(7
)
(7
)
(7
)
11
12
13
33
32
29
(1
)
(1
)
(1
)
$
(33
)
$
(10
)
$
10
$
55
$
42
$
53
Net Sales
Operating Earnings
Sales to U.S. Government
2001
2000
1999
2001
2000
1999
2001
2000
1999
$
2,800
$
2,388
$
1,422
$
260
$
221
$
127
$
1,991
$
1,606
$
833
2,210
1,273
1,290
238
156
155
1,785
1,084
1,178
3,612
3,413
3,088
310
324
328
3,403
3,360
3,054
3,265
3,029
2,909
625
592
482
140
130
138
276
253
250
52
36
111
$
12,163
$
10,356
$
8,959
$
1,485
$
1,329
$
1,203
$
7,319
$
6,180
$
5,203
Depreciation,
Identifiable Assets
Capital Expenditures
Depletion and Amortization
2001
2000
1999
2001
2000
1999
2001
2000
1999
$
3,459
$
2,340
$
2,418
$
54
$
71
$
25
$
94
$
85
$
54
2,118
1,054
938
43
14
12
56
26
27
1,731
1,613
1,431
119
132
101
55
52
51
2,360
1,710
1,757
28
29
29
44
39
38
313
317
373
20
25
20
16
17
17
1,088
953
857
92
17
10
6
7
6
$
11,069
$
7,987
$
7,774
$
356
$
288
$
197
$
271
$
226
$
193
*
Other includes the results of the companys coal, aggregates and finance
operations, as well as the operating results of the companys commercial
pension plans, including Gulfstreams merged plans post-acquisition, as
further described in Note R. Operating earnings for 1999 included a
non-recurring gain of $126 related to the commercial pension plan merger,
also described in Note R, and a non-cash charge to earnings of $61 related
to the revaluation of undeveloped coal reserves and related assets.
**
Corporate identifiable assets include cash and equivalents from domestic
operations, deferred taxes, real estate held for development and net
prepaid pension cost related to the companys commercial pension plans.
Year Ended December 31
2001
2000
1999
$
10,866
$
9,386
$
7,991
115
153
188
11
38
41
10,992
9,577
8,220
555
190
261
426
229
325
153
275
84
19
67
58
18
18
11
$
12,163
$
10,356
$
8,959
Common Stock
Net Earnings
Market Price
Per Share
Range
Net
Operating
Net
Dividends
Sales
Earnings
Earnings
Basic
(a)
Diluted
High
Low
Declared
$
3,508
$
404
$
246
$
1.22
$
1.21
$
96.00
$
75.60
$
.28
3,020
376
230
1.14
1.13
90.20
73.76
.28
2,962
371
227
1.13
1.12
84.28
62.94
.28
2,673
334
240
(b)
1.20
(b)
1.19
(b)
78.19
60.50
.28
$
2,691
$
351
$
219
$
1.10
$
1.09
$
79.00
$
58.75
$
.26
2,502
337
294
(c)
1.48
(c)
1.47
(c)
64.94
51.87
.26
2,617
335
204
1.02
1.01
61.19
48.00
.26
2,546
306
184
.92
.91
57.56
36.25
.26
(a)
The sum of the basic earnings per share for the four quarters of 2000
differs from the annual basic earnings per share due to the required
method of computing the weighted average number of shares in interim
periods.
(b)
Included a non-cash tax benefit of $28, or $.14 per share, as further
described in Note D.
(c)
Included a research and experimentation tax credit of $90, or $.45 per
share, as further described in Note D.
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2001
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
$
11,563
$
600
$
$
12,163
(24
)
9,380
499
9,855
782
41
823
24
1,401
60
1,485
(52
)
(4
)
(12
)
(68
)
4
4
4
12
(34
)
(32
)
61
(5
)
(58
)
1,369
113
1,424
(40
)
498
23
481
961
(961
)
$
943
$
871
$
90
$
(961
)
$
943
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
Year Ended December
31, 2000
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
$
10,077
$
279
$
$
10,356
(14
)
8,165
229
8,380
630
17
647
14
1,282
33
1,329
(60
)
(1
)
(11
)
(72
)
5
5
2
12
(7
)
(29
)
29
(7
)
(48
)
1,257
53
1,262
(90
)
452
(1
)
361
859
(859
)
$
901
$
805
$
54
$
(859
)
$
901
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
Year Ended December
31, 1999
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
$
8,645
$
314
$
$
8,959
(145
)
7,085
246
7,186
548
22
570
145
1,012
46
1,203
(27
)
(16
)
(10
)
(53
)
10
7
2
19
(8
)
(41
)
6
(43
)
120
962
44
1,126
(104
)
328
22
246
656
(656
)
$
880
$
634
$
22
$
(656
)
$
880
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
December 31, 2001
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
174
$
3
$
265
$
$
442
833
163
996
35
1,525
177
1,737
643
643
358
3
361
254
254
30
1
31
147
231
51
429
356
3,877
660
4,893
157
2,888
493
3,538
(19
)
(1,406
)
(345
)
(1,770
)
3,139
989
4,128
(332
)
(38
)
(370
)
235
210
205
650
9,158
(9,158
)
9,531
4,499
1,304
(9,158
)
6,176
$
9,887
$
8,376
$
1,964
$
(9,158
)
$
11,069
$
1,165
$
20
$
26
$
$
1,211
154
2,573
641
3,368
1,319
2,593
667
4,579
500
60
164
724
356
776
106
1,238
856
836
270
1,962
694
3,737
1,117
(4,854
)
694
7,018
1,210
(90
)
(4,304
)
3,834
7,712
4,947
1,027
(9,158
)
4,528
$
9,887
$
8,376
$
1,964
$
(9,158
)
$
11,069
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
December 31, 2000
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
153
$
1
$
23
$
$
177
1
760
37
798
56
1,178
4
1,238
405
405
289
289
236
236
23
23
126
233
26
385
336
3,125
90
3,551
75
2,543
22
2,640
(16
)
(1,323
)
(7
)
(1,346
)
2,585
216
2,801
(254
)
(16
)
(270
)
203
200
208
611
7,110
(7,110
)
7,372
3,751
423
(7,110
)
4,436
$
7,708
$
6,876
$
513
$
(7,110
)
$
7,987
$
340
$
$
$
$
340
85
2,386
90
2,561
425
2,386
90
2,901
23
150
173
402
578
113
1,093
402
601
263
1,266
619
3,398
287
(3,685
)
619
6,262
491
(127
)
(3,425
)
3,201
6,881
3,889
160
(7,110
)
3,820
$
7,708
$
6,876
$
513
$
(7,110
)
$
7,987
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2001
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
86
$
814
$
203
$
$
1,103
(1,162
)
(374
)
85
(1,451
)
(92
)
(244
)
(20
)
(356
)
(19
)
54
26
61
(1,273
)
(564
)
91
(1,746
)
825
825
500
500
(149
)
(5
)
1
(153
)
(219
)
(219
)
(72
)
14
13
(45
)
885
9
14
908
323
(257
)
(66
)
21
2
242
265
153
1
23
177
$
174
$
3
$
265
$
$
442
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
Year Ended December
31, 2000
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
(53
)
$
1,137
$
(13
)
$
$
1,071
(17
)
(268
)
(3
)
(288
)
(6
)
(54
)
19
(41
)
(23
)
(322
)
16
(329
)
(508
)
(508
)
(202
)
(202
)
(208
)
(208
)
111
111
(5
)
(23
)
(28
)
(807
)
(5
)
(23
)
(835
)
866
(859
)
(7
)
(17
)
(49
)
(27
)
(93
)
170
50
50
270
$
153
$
1
$
23
$
$
177
Other
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
on a Combined
on a Combined
Consolidating
Total
Year Ended December
31, 1999
Parent
Basis
Basis
Adjustments
Consolidated
$
343
$
656
$
17
$
$
1,016
(1,042
)
(48
)
(1,090
)
10
81
91
(10
)
(182
)
(5
)
(197
)
(2
)
(29
)
4
(27
)
(1,044
)
(178
)
(1
)
(1,223
)
844
844
(414
)
(19
)
(433
)
(136
)
(136
)
22
(30
)
(8
)
730
(444
)
(19
)
267
67
(70
)
3
96
(36
)
60
74
86
50
210
$
170
$
50
$
50
$
270
Michael J. Mancuso
John W. Schwartz
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Vice President and Controller
Vienna, Virginia
January 21, 2002 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in Note J and Note O, as to which the date is March 15, 2002)
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
(Dollars and shares in millions,
except per share and employee amounts)
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
$
12,163
$
10,356
$
8,959
$
7,398
$
5,966
1,485
1,329
1,203
918
676
(56
)
(60
)
(34
)
(17
)
16
481
361
246
315
130
943
901
880
589
559
4.69
4.51
4.40
2.95
2.80
4.65
4.48
4.36
2.91
2.73
1.12
1.04
.96
.88
.82
254,800
239,000
227,500
208,600
191,700
$
442
$
177
$
270
$
303
$
774
11,069
7,987
7,774
6,196
5,583
1,935
513
1,022
530
645
4,528
3,820
3,170
2,407
2,008
22.56
19.05
15.77
12.08
10.02
$
19,384
(1)
$
14,442
$
11,951
$
10,841
$
9,699
26,832
(1)
19,742
19,916
19,332
12,531
200.7
200.5
201.0
199.3
200.3
201.1
199.8
200.0
199.5
199.8
202.9
201.3
202.1
202.2
204.5
51,700
43,300
43,400
38,440
34,800
(1)
Excludes $785 of funded backlog and $2,485 of total backlog resulting from the company's termination on March 25, 2002 of its agreements with Avolar, a subsidiary of UAL Corporation.
Exhibit 21, Annual Report on Form 10-K
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
Page 1
SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 7, 2002
Subsidiaries of General Dynamics
Place of
Percent of
Corporation (Parent and Registrant)
Incorporation
Voting Power
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Maine
100
Maine
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
New Jersey
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
District of Columbia
100
France
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Virgin Islands
100
Exhibit 21, Annual Report on Form 10-K
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
Page 2
SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 7, 2002
Subsidiaries of General Dynamics
Place of
Percent of
Corporation (Parent and Registrant)
Incorporation
Voting Power
Delaware
100
California
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Italy
100
Turkey
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Maryland
100
Texas
100
Delaware
100
Cayman Islands
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Maryland
100
Canada
100
Delaware
100
Virginia
100
Washington
100
Delaware
100
California
100
Switzerland
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Alabama
100
Florida
100
Pennsylvania
100
Virgin Islands
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Cayman Islands
100
Exhibit 21, Annual Report on Form 10-K
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
Page 3
SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 7, 2002
Subsidiaries of General Dynamics
Place of
Percent of
Corporation (Parent and Registrant)
Incorporation
Voting Power
Delaware
100
Canada
100
Thailand
100
Canada
100
United Kingdom
100
United Kingdom
100
United Kingdom
100
United Kingdom
100
Austria
100
United Kingdom
100
Canada
100
England and Wales
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
California
100
Oklahoma
100
Georgia
100
Barbados
100
Cyprus
100
Delaware
100
Texas
100
Delaware
100
Georgia
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Florida
100
Minnesota
100
Nevada
100
Georgia
100
Georgia
100
Mexico
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Illinois
100
Illinois
100
Delaware
100
Illinois
100
Illinois
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Exhibit 21, Annual Report on Form 10-K
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
Page 4
SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 7, 2002
Subsidiaries of General Dynamics
Place of
Percent of
Corporation (Parent and Registrant)
Incorporation
Voting Power
Delaware
100
California
100
Mexico
100
Nevada
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Delaware
100
Spain
100
Spain
100
Exhibit 23, Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001, into the companys previously filed Registration Statements
File Numbers 2-23904, 2-24270, 33-23448, 33-42799, 333-26571, 333-74574,
333-77024 (including 333-77024-01 through 333-77024-13), and 333-80213-01.
Vienna, Virginia
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
March 28, 2002
Exhibit 24, Annual Report on Form 10-K
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT, that each of the undersigned Directors
of GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, hereby constitutes and
appoints each of NICHOLAS D. CHABRAJA, MICHAEL J. MANCUSO and DAVID A. SAVNER
as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Dynamics
Corporation, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 6th
day of March 2002.
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
/s/ Julius W. Becton, Jr.
/s/ George A. Joulwan
Julius W. Becton, Jr.
George A. Joulwan
/s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja
/s/ Paul G. Kaminski
Nicholas D. Chabraja
Paul G. Kaminski
/s/ James S. Crown
/s/ James R. Mellor
James S. Crown
James R. Mellor
/s/ Lester Crown
/s/ Carl E. Mundy, Jr.
Lester Crown
Carl E. Mundy, Jr.
/s/ Charles H. Goodman
/s/ Carlisle A. H. Trost
Charles H. Goodman
Carlisle A. H. Trost
Exhibit 99.1, Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001
Commission File Number 1-3671
GENERAL DYNAMICS
March 29, 2002
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is being filed by General Dynamics Corporation with its Form 10-K pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X to set forth certain representations made to General Dynamics by Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with their audit.
General Dynamics received a representation letter dated March 28, 2002, from Arthur Andersen LLP indicating that they have audited the consolidated financial statements of General Dynamics Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended, and have issued their report thereon dated January 21, 2002 (except with respect to the matters discussed in Note J and Note O, as to which the date is March 15, 2002). In the representation letter, Arthur Andersen represented that the audit was subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.
/s/ John W. Schwartz
John W. Schwartz
Vice President and Controller