SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One) (X) Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended DECEMBER 31, 2002
OR
( ) Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _______to_______

Commission File Number 0-368

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        MINNESOTA                                      41-0462685
(State or other jurisdiction of                     (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                    Identification No.)

        215 SOUTH CASCADE STREET                        56538-0496
    BOX 496, FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA                    (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 866-410-8780

Securities registered pursuant to                  Name of each exchange
    Section 12(b) of the Act:                       on which registered
      Title of each class                                   NONE
             NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

COMMON SHARES, PAR VALUE $5.00 PER SHARE
PREFERRED SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS
CUMULATIVE PREFERRED SHARES, WITHOUT PAR VALUE
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (Yes X No _____)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (Yes X No _____)

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates on June 28, 2002 was $784,354,838.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date: 25,593,524 COMMON SHARES ($5 PAR VALUE) AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2003.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:
2002 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS-PORTIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO PARTS I AND II

PROXY STATEMENT DATED MARCH 6, 2003-PORTIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO PART III


PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

(a) General Development of Business

Otter Tail Corporation (the Company) was incorporated in 1907 under the laws of the State of Minnesota. The Company's executive offices are located at 215 South Cascade Street, Box 496, Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56538-0496 and 3203 32nd Avenue South, P.O. Box 9156, Fargo, North Dakota 58106-9156. Its telephone number is (866) 410-8780.

The Company makes available free of charge at its internet website (www.ottertail.com) its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information on the Company's website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In the late 1980s, the Company determined that its core electric business was located in a region of the country where there was little or no growth in the demand for electricity. In order to maintain growth for shareholders, Otter Tail Power Company (as the Company was known) began to explore opportunities for the acquisition and long-term ownership of nonelectric businesses. This strategy has resulted in steady growth over the years. In 2001, the name of the Company was changed to "Otter Tail Corporation" to more accurately represent the broader scope of electric and nonelectric operations and the name "Otter Tail Power Company" was retained for use by the electric utility. In 2002, approximately 57% of the Company's consolidated revenues and approximately 31% of the Company's consolidated net income came from nonelectric operations.

The Company's strategy is focused on the growth of its operating companies. The Company's goal is to create value and growth through the acquisition, long-term ownership and decentralized operation of diverse businesses. The Company's electric utility provides a steady base of revenues and earnings as part of this strategy. The following guidelines are considered when reviewing potential acquisition candidates:

o Emerging or middle market company;

o Proven entrepreneurial management team that will remain after the acquisition;

o Products and services intended for commercial rather than retail consumer use;

o The potential to provide immediate earnings and future growth; and

o Preference for 100% ownership of acquired entities.

The Company assesses the performance of its operating companies' return on capital and will consider divesting under-performing operating companies.

Otter Tail Corporation and its subsidiaries conducted business in 48 states and 6 Canadian provinces and had approximately 3,111 full-time employees at December 31, 2002. The businesses of the Company have been classified into five segments: Electric, Plastics, Manufacturing, Health Services and Other Business Operations.

o Electric (the Utility) includes the production, transmission, distribution and sale of electric energy in Minnesota, North Dakota

1

and South Dakota under the name Otter Tail Power Company. Electric utility operations have been the Company's primary business since incorporation.

o Plastics consists of businesses producing polyvinyl chloride pipe in the Upper Midwest, West, Southwest and South-central regions of the United States.

o Manufacturing consists of businesses in the following manufacturing activities: production of waterfront equipment, wind towers, frame-straightening equipment and accessories for the auto repair industry, custom plastic pallets, material and handling trays and horticultural containers; fabrication of steel products; contract machining; and metal parts stamping and fabrication. These businesses are located primarily in the Upper Midwest and Utah.

o Health Services consists of businesses involved in the sale of diagnostic medical equipment, supplies and accessories. These businesses also provide service maintenance, mobile and fixed-based diagnostic services, portable X-ray imaging and interim rental of diagnostic medical imaging equipment to various medical institutions located in 40 states.

o Other Business Operations consists of businesses in electrical and telephone construction contracting, transportation, telecommunications, entertainment and energy services and natural gas marketing as well as the portion of corporate administrative and general expenses that are not allocated to other segments. These businesses operate primarily in the Upper Midwest, except for the transportation company which operates in 48 states and 6 Canadian provinces.

The Company's electric operations, including wholesales power sales, are operated as a division of Otter Tail Corporation, and the Company's energy services and natural gas marketing operations are operated as indirect subsidiaries of Otter Tail Corporation. Substantially all the other businesses are owned by the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Varistar Corporation (Varistar).

The Company continues to investigate acquisitions of additional nonelectric businesses and expects continued growth in this area. The following acquisitions were completed during 2002:

o On May 1, 2002 the Company acquired the stock of Computed Imaging Services, Inc. (CIS) of Houston, Texas for 158,257 shares of Otter Tail Corporation common stock and approximately $1.2 million in cash. CIS provides computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging mobile services, interim rental, and sales and service of new, used and refurbished diagnostic imaging equipment to hospitals and other healthcare facilities in the south central United States. The acquisition of CIS allows the Company to expand its existing Health Services operations into another region of the country. CIS annual revenues were approximately $5.9 million in 2001.

o On May 28, 2002 the Company acquired the stock of ShoreMaster, Inc. of Fergus Falls, Minnesota for 303,124 shares of the Company's common stock and $2.3 million in cash. ShoreMaster is a leading manufacturer of waterfront equipment ranging from residential-use boatlifts and docks to commercial marina systems. The acquisition of ShoreMaster is expected to provide diversification and growth opportunities for the Company's Manufacturing segment. ShoreMaster's annual revenues were approximately $20 million in 2001.

2

o On October 1, 2002 the Company acquired the stock of Galva Foam Marine Industries, Inc. of Camdenton, Missouri for 256,940 shares of the Company's common stock and approximately $1.0 million in cash. Galva Foam is a leading manufacturer of waterfront equipment ranging from residential boatlifts and docks to commercial marina systems. The acquisition of Galva Foam, in combination with the ShoreMaster acquisition, will expand the market reach of the Company's waterfront manufacturing product line nationwide with both saltwater and freshwater products. Galva Foam had annual revenues of approximately $13 million in 2001.

o In 2002, the Company also acquired two other businesses, neither of which was individually material, one in energy management services and the other in health services. The total purchase price for these businesses was approximately $2 million in cash.

For a discussion of the Company's results of operations, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which is incorporated by reference to pages 18 through 30 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

(b) Financial Information About Industry Segments

The Company is engaged in businesses that have been classified into five segments: Electric, Plastics, Manufacturing, Health Services and Other Business Operations. Financial information about the Company's segments is incorporated by reference to note 2 of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on pages 38 through 49 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

(c) Narrative Description of Business

ELECTRIC

General

The Utility, which conducts business under the name of Otter Tail Power Company, provides electricity to more than 127,000 customers in a 50,000 square mile area of Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota. The Company derived 43% of its consolidated operating revenues from the Electric segment in 2002, 47% in 2001 and 45% in 2000. In 2002, approximately 50.5% of retail electric revenues came from Minnesota, 41.2% from North Dakota and 8.3% from South Dakota compared to 50.9% from Minnesota, 41.2% from North Dakota and 7.9% from South Dakota for 2001.

The territory served by the Utility is predominantly agricultural, including a part of the Red River Valley. Although there are relatively few large customers, sales to commercial and industrial customers are significant. By customer category, 29.1% of 2002 electric revenue was derived from commercial customers, 25.0% from residential customers, 15.8% from industrial customers and 30.1% from other sources, including municipalities, farms and wholesale sales. For 2001, electric revenue by category was 26.6% from commercial customers, 23.4% from residential, 15.4% from industrial and 34.6% from other sources.

Wholesale electric energy sales increased from 44.0% of total kwh sales in 2001 to 45.2% of total kwh sales in 2002. While wholesale electric energy kwh sales grew 7.8% between the years, revenue per kwh decreased by 22.5% resulting in a reduction of wholesale energy gross margins. Activity in the short-term energy market is subject to change based on a number of factors and it is difficult to predict the quantity of wholesale power sales or prices for wholesale power in the future. However, the Company expects that market conditions for wholesale power transactions in 2003 will be similar to the conditions that existed in 2002.

3

The aggregate population of the Utility's retail electric service area is approximately 230,000. In this service area of 423 communities and adjacent rural areas and farms, approximately 130,900 people live in communities having a population of more than 1,000, according to the 2000 census. The only communities served which have a population in excess of 10,000 are Jamestown, North Dakota (15,527); Fergus Falls, Minnesota (13,471); and Bemidji, Minnesota (11,917). As of December 31, 2002 the Utility served 127,157 customers. This is an increase of 539 customers from December 31, 2001.

Capability and Demand

At December 31, 2002 the Utility had base load net plant capability totaling 563,258 kw, consisting of 253,508 kw from the jointly-owned Big Stone Plant (constituting the Utility's 53.9% share of the plant's total capability), 154,350 kw from the Hoot Lake Plant (owned solely by the Utility), 149,450 kw from the jointly-owned Coyote Station (constituting the Utility's 35% share of the station's total capability), and, under contract, 5,950 kw from a co-generation plant near Bemidji, Minnesota. In addition to its base load capability, the Utility has combustion turbine and small diesel units, used chiefly for peaking and standby purposes, with a total capability of 92,855 kw, and hydroelectric capability of 4,336 kw. During 2002, the Utility generated about 78% of its retail kwh sales and purchased the balance.

The Utility has arrangements to help meet its future base load requirements and continues to investigate other means for meeting such requirements. The Utility has under construction a gas-fired combustion turbine expected to be operational by June 1, 2003. The unit will have a total capability between 40,000 and 50,000 kw. The Utility has an agreement with another utility for the annual exchange of 75,000 kw of seasonal capacity which runs through October 2004. The Utility has an agreement to purchase 50,000 kw of year-round capacity which extends through April 30, 2005 and another agreement to purchase 50,000 kw of year-round capacity through April 30, 2010 from another utility. The Utility had a seasonal capacity agreement to purchase 50,000 kw for the summer 2002. The Utility has a direct control load management system which provides some flexibility to the Utility to effect reductions of peak load. The Utility, in addition, offers rates to customers which encourage off-peak usage.

The Utility traditionally experiences its peak system demand during the winter season. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Utility experienced a system peak demand of 640,220 kw on February 4, 2002. The highest sixty-minute peak demand ever was 642,826 kw on December 14, 2000. The Utility's capability of meeting system demand at the time of the peak in February 2002, including power purchase agreements, its own generating capacity and reserve requirements computed in accordance with accepted industry practice, amounted to 843,969 kw. The Utility's additional capacity available under power purchase contracts (as described above), combined with generating capability and load management control capabilities, is expected to meet 2003 system demand, including industry reserve requirements.

Fuel Supply

Coal is the principal fuel burned at the Big Stone, Coyote and Hoot Lake generating plants. Coyote, a mine-mouth facility, burns North Dakota lignite coal. Hoot Lake and Big Stone plants burn western subbituminous coal.

4

The following table shows the sources of energy used to generate the Utility's net output of electricity for 2002 and 2001:

                               2002                           2001
                     -------------------------     ------------------------
                      Net Kilowatt  % of Total     Net Kilowatt  % of Total
                          Hours      Kilowatt         Hours        Kilowatt
                       Generated       Hour         Generated        Hour
   Sources            (Thousands)   Generated      (Thousands)    Generated
   -------            ------------  ----------     ------------  ----------
Subbituminous Coal..... 2,459,046       69.3%        2,663,298       70.7%
Lignite Coal........... 1,063,942       30.0         1,075,545       28.6
Hydro..................    24,220         .7            23,531         .6
Oil....................     1,205         .0             2,891         .1
                        ---------      -----         ---------      -----
Total.................. 3,548,413      100.0%        3,765,265      100.0%
                        =========      =====         =========      =====

The Utility has a primary coal supply agreement with RAG Coal West, Inc. for the supply of Wyoming subbituminous coal to Big Stone Plant for 2003-2004. Purchases are made for the supply of subbituminous coal for the Hoot Lake Plant under a contract with Kennecott Coal Sales Company expiring June 30, 2004. A lignite coal contract with Dakota Westmoreland Corporation for the Coyote Station expires in 2016, with a 15-year renewal option subject to certain contingencies.

It is the Utility's practice to maintain minimum 30-day inventory (at full output) of coal at the Big Stone Plant, a 20-day inventory at the Coyote Station and a 10-day inventory at the Hoot Lake Plant.

Railroad transportation services to the Big Stone Plant are being provided under a common carrier rate by the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Co. The Company has filed a complaint in regard to this rate with the Surface Transportation Board requesting the Board set a competitive rate. The Surface Transportation Board is not likely to act on this complaint until late in 2004. The Company would expect the outcome of the proceeding to have a favorable impact on its fuel costs for Big Stone Plant. An agreement is in place with the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad for Hoot Lake Plant which expires in mid-2004. No coal transportation agreement is needed for the Coyote Station due to its location next to a coal mine.

The average cost of coal consumed (including handling charges to the plant sites) per million BTU for each of the three years 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $1.125, $1.014 and $.994, respectively.

The Utility is permitted by the State of South Dakota to burn some alternative fuels, including tire derived fuel, at the Big Stone Plant. The quantity of alternative fuel burned at the Big Stone Plant is insignificant when compared to the total annual coal consumption at the Big Stone Plant.

General Regulation

The Utility is subject to regulation of rates and other matters in each of the three states in which it operates and by the federal government for certain interstate operations. A breakdown of electric rate regulation by each jurisdiction is as follows:

5

                                                    2002                   2001
                                             -----------------     -------------------
                                               % of      % of        % of      % of
                                             Electric     kwh      Electric     kwh
 Rates                  Regulation           Revenues    Sales     Revenues    Sales
 -----                  ----------           --------  --------    --------   --------
MN retail sales         MN Public Utilities
                        Commission             35.8%     28.3%       33.8%      29.3%

ND retail sales         ND Public Service
                        Commission             29.2      21.9        27.4       22.4

SD retail sales         SD Public Utilities
                        Commission              5.8       4.5         5.3        4.3

Transmission &          Federal Energy
  sales for resale      Regulatory Commission  29.2      45.3        33.5       44.0
                                              -----     -----       -----      -----
                                              100.0%    100.0%      100.0%     100.0%
                                              =====     =====       =====      =====

The Utility operates under approved retail electric tariffs in all three states it serves. The Utility has an obligation to serve any customer requesting service within its assigned service territory. Accordingly, the Utility has designed its electric system to provide continuous service at time of peak usage. The pattern of electric usage can vary dramatically during a 24 hour period and from season to season. The Utility's tariffs provide for continuous electric service and are designed to cover the costs of service during peak times. To the extent that peak usage can be reduced or shifted to periods of lower usage, the cost to serve all customers is reduced. In order to shift usage from peak times, the Utility has approved tariffs in all three states for lower rates for residential demand control and controlled service, in Minnesota and North Dakota for real-time pricing, and in North Dakota and South Dakota for bulk interruptible rates. Each of these special rates is designed to improve efficient use of the Utility facilities, while encouraging use of cost-effective electricity instead of other fuels and giving customers more control over the size of their electric bill. In all three states, the Utility has approved tariffs which allow qualifying customers to release and sell energy back to the Utility when wholesale energy prices make such transactions desirable.

The majority of the Utility's electric retail rate schedules now in effect provide for adjustments in rates based on the cost of fuel delivered to the Utility's generating plants, as well as for adjustments based on the cost of electric energy purchased by the Company. Such adjustments are presently based on a two-month moving average in Minnesota and under FERC, a three-month moving average in South Dakota and a four-month moving average in North Dakota. These adjustments are applied to the next billing after becoming applicable.

The following summarizes the material regulations of each jurisdiction applicable to the Utility's electric operations, as well as the specific electric rate proceedings during the last three years with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC), the North Dakota Public Service Commission (NDPSC), the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (SDPUC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The Company's nonelectric businesses are not subject to direct regulation by any of these agencies.

Minnesota: Under the Minnesota Public Utilities Act, the Utility is subject to the jurisdiction of the MPUC with respect to rates, issuance of securities, depreciation rates, public utility services, construction of major utility facilities, establishment of exclusive assigned service areas, contracts and arrangements with subsidiaries and other affiliated interests, and other matters. The MPUC has the authority to assess the need for large energy facilities and to issue or deny certificates of need, after public hearings, within six months of an application to construct such a facility. The Utility has not had a significant rate proceeding before the MPUC since July 1987.

6

The Department of Commerce (DOC) is responsible for investigating all matters subject to the jurisdiction of the DOC or the MPUC, and for the enforcement of MPUC orders. Among other things, the DOC is authorized to collect and analyze data on energy and the consumption of energy, develop recommendations as to energy policies for the governor and the legislature of Minnesota and evaluate policies governing the establishment of rates and prices for energy as related to energy conservation. The DOC acts as a state advocate in matters heard before the MPUC. The DOC also has the power, in the event of energy shortage or for a long-term basis, to prepare and adopt regulations to conserve and allocate energy.

Under Minnesota law, every regulated public utility that furnishes electric service must make annual investments and expenditures in energy conservation improvements, or make a contribution to the state's energy and conservation account, in an amount equal to at least 1.5% of its gross operating revenues from service provided in Minnesota. The DOC may require the utility to make investments and expenditures in energy conservation improvements whenever it finds that the improvement will result in energy savings at a total cost to the utility less than the cost to the utility to produce or purchase an equivalent amount of a new supply of energy. Such DOC orders are appealable to the MPUC. Investments made pursuant to such orders generally are recoverable costs in rate cases, even though ownership of the improvement may belong to the property owner rather than the utility. Since 1995, the Utility has recovered demand-side management related costs not included in base rates under Minnesota's Conservation Improvement Programs through the use of an annual recovery mechanism approved by the MPUC.

The MPUC requires the submission of a 15-year advance integrated resource plan by utilities serving at least 10,000 customers, either directly or indirectly, and having at least 100 megawatts of load. The MPUC's findings and orders with respect to these submissions are binding for jurisdictional utilities. Typically, the filings are submitted every two years. The Utility's most recent plan was submitted to the MPUC in 2002 and was approved early in 2003. The MPUC also granted the Utility a one-year waiver in submitting its next integrated resource plan, which will be completed in 2005.

The MPUC requires the annual filing of a capital structure petition. In this filing the MPUC reviews and approves the capital structure for the Company. Once the petition is approved, the Company may issue securities without further petition or approval, provided the issuance is consistent with the purposes and amounts set forth in the approved capital structure petition. The Company's current capital structure petition is in effect until March 31, 2003. The Company filed its capital structure petition for 2003 on January 31, 2003 and is awaiting action from the MPUC.

The Minnesota legislature has enacted a statute that favors conservation over the addition of new resources. In addition, it has mandated the use of renewable resources where new supplies are needed, unless the utility proves that a renewable energy facility is not in the public interest. It has effectively prohibited the building of new nuclear facilities. An existing environmental externality law requires the MPUC, to the extent practicable, to quantify the environmental costs of each type of generation, and to use such monetized values in evaluating resource plans. The MPUC must disallow any nonrenewable rate base additions (whether within or outside of the state) or any rate recovery therefrom, and may not approve any nonrenewable energy facility in an integrated resource plan, unless the utility proves that a renewable energy facility is not in the public interest. The state has prioritized the acceptability of new generation with wind and solar ranked first and coal and nuclear ranked fifth, the lowest ranking.

Pursuant to the Minnesota Power Plant Siting Act, the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) has been granted the authority to regulate the siting in Minnesota of large electric power generating facilities in an orderly manner compatible with environmental preservation and the efficient use of resources. To that end, the EQB is empowered, after study, evaluation and

7

hearings, to select or designate sites in Minnesota for new electric power generating plants (50,000 kw or more) and routes for transmission lines (100 kv or more) and to certify such sites and routes as to environmental compatibility.

The Minnesota Legislature enacted the Minnesota Energy Security and Reliability Act in 2001. Its primary focus was to streamline the siting and routing processes for the construction of new electric generation and transmission projects. The bill also added to utility requirements for renewable energy and energy conservation.

North Dakota: The Utility is subject to the jurisdiction of the NDPSC with respect to rates, services, certain issuances of securities and other matters. The NDPSC periodically performs audits of gas and electric utilities over which it has rate setting jurisdiction to determine the reasonableness of overall rate levels. In the past, these audits have occasionally resulted in settlement agreements adjusting rate levels for the Utility. The North Dakota Energy Conversion and Transmission Facility Siting Act grants the NDPSC the authority to approve sites in North Dakota for large electric generating facilities and high voltage transmission lines. This Act is similar to the Minnesota Power Plant Siting Act described above and applies to proposed new electric power generating plants of 50,000 kw or more and proposed new transmission lines of more than 115 kv. The Utility is required to submit a ten-year plan to the NDPSC annually.

On December 29, 2000 the NDPSC approved a performance-based ratemaking (PBR) plan that links allowed earnings in North Dakota to seven performance standards in the areas of price, electric service reliability, customer satisfaction and employee safety. The PBR plan is effective for 2001 through 2005, unless suspended or terminated by the NDPSC or the Utility. This PBR plan provides the opportunity for the Utility to raise its allowed rate of return and share income with customers when earnings exceed the allowed return. During 2001, the Utility achieved a rate of return on equity that exceeded targets under the plan, resulting in a sharing of the income between shareholders and customers in the form of a $662,300 refund to North Dakota retail electric customers in 2002. The Utility's 2002 rate of return is expected to be within the allowable range defined in the plan.

The NDPSC reserves the right to review the issuance of stocks, bonds, notes and other evidence of indebtedness of a public utility. However, the issuance by a public utility of securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission is expressly exempted from review by the NDPSC under North Dakota state law.

South Dakota: The South Dakota Public Utilities Act subjects the Utility to the jurisdiction of the SDPUC with respect to rates, public utility services, establishment of assigned service areas and other matters. The Utility is not currently subject to the jurisdiction of the SDPUC with respect to the issuance of securities. Under the South Dakota Energy Facility Permit Act, the SDPUC has the authority to approve sites in South Dakota for large energy conversion facilities (100,000 kw or more) and transmission lines of 115 kv or more. There have been no significant rate proceedings in South Dakota since November 1987.

FERC: Wholesale power sales and transmission rates are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act of 1935, as amended (FPA). The FERC is an independent agency which has jurisdiction over rates for electricity sales for resale, transmission and sale of electric energy in interstate commerce, interconnection of facilities, and accounting policies and practices. Filed rates are effective after a one-day suspension period, subject to ultimate approval by the FERC. The Utility is a member of the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP), which operates in parts of eight states in the Upper Midwest and in three provinces in Canada. Power pool sales are conducted

8

continuously through MAPP in accordance with schedules filed by MAPP with the FERC. Additional MAPP functions include a regional reliability council that maintains generation reserve sharing requirements.

The Utility agreed in October 2001 to join the Midwest Independent System Operator (MISO) regional transmission organization (RTO) pursuant to FERC Order No. 2000. In December 2001, the MISO received FERC approval as a regional transmission organization. FERC's view is that the MISO will benefit the public interest by enhancing the reliability of the Midwest electric grid and facilitating and enhancing wholesale competition. The MISO covers a broad region containing all or parts of 20 states and one Canadian province. The MISO began operational control of the Utility's transmission facilities above 100 kv on February 1, 2002, but the Utility continues to own and maintain its transmission assets. As the transmission provider and security coordinator for the region, the MISO offers available capacity, accepts schedules and provides settlement for transmission services.

In July 2002, the FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) on Standard Market Design (SMD). Its purpose is to insure standard commercial rules for the operation of competitive markets for electricity. The SMD NOPR calls for markets to be operational across the United States by the end of 2004. The MISO, with strong FERC encouragement, has established the end of 2003 as a target for MISO markets to be operational within its geographical area of operation. The MISO is working together with the FERC on this process and has filed proposed energy market rules with FERC for day-ahead and real-time energy markets and financial transmission rights and has requested assurances from FERC that all start-up costs will be recoverable for market participants. As the Utility transitions to the full operation of the MISO there could be short-term negative impacts on wholesale power transactions.

Other: The Utility is subject to various federal and state laws, including the Federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, which are intended to promote the conservation of energy and the development and use of alternative energy sources. The Utility may also become subject to comprehensive energy legislation currently pending before the United States Congress.

The Utility is unable to predict the impact on its operations resulting from future regulatory activities, from future legislation or from future tax that may be imposed on the source or use of energy.

Competition, Deregulation and Legislation

Electric sales are subject to competition in some areas from municipally owned systems, rural electric cooperatives and, in certain respects, from on-site generators and cogenerators. Electricity also competes with other forms of energy. The degree of competition may vary from time to time depending on relative costs and supplies of other forms of energy. The Utility may also face competition as the restructuring of the electric industry evolves.

The Company believes the Utility is well positioned to be successful in a more competitive environment. A comparison of the Utility's electric retail rates to the rates of other investor-owned utilities, cooperatives and municipals in the states the Utility serves indicates that the Utility's rates are competitive. In addition, the Utility would attempt more flexible pricing strategies under an open, competitive environment.

Legislative and regulatory activity could affect operations in the future. The Utility cannot predict the timing or substance of any future legislation or regulation. State and federal efforts to restructure the electric utility industry have slowed. The United States Congress ended its 2002 legislative session without passing electric industry restructuring legislation. Congress did consider a comprehensive energy bill, but failed to pass it prior to the November elections. There was no legislative action in

9

2002 regarding electric retail choice in any of the states where the Utility operates and no major electricity legislation is expected in 2003 legislative sessions in those states. The Company does not expect retail competition to come to the States of Minnesota, North Dakota or South Dakota in the foreseeable future.

Environmental Regulation

Impact of Environmental Laws: The Utility's existing generating plants are subject to stringent federal and state standards and regulations regarding, among other things, air, water and solid waste pollution. The Utility estimates it has expended in the five years ended December 31, 2002, approximately $5.3 million for environmental control facilities. Included in the 2003-2007 construction budget are approximately $2.6 million for environmental equipment for existing and new facilities, including $0.8 million for 2003.

Air Quality: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act of 1970 as amended (the Act), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has promulgated national primary and secondary standards for certain air pollutants.

The primary fuels burned by the Utility's steam generating plants are North Dakota lignite coal and western subbituminous coal. Electrostatic precipitators have been installed at the principal units at the Hoot Lake Plant. A fabric filter to collect particulates from stack gases has been installed on a smaller unit at Hoot Lake Plant. As a result, the units at the Hoot Lake Plant currently meet all presently applicable federal and state air quality and emission standards.

The Utility improved the fine particulate emissions control at Big Stone Plant by replacing a major portion of the plant's electrostatic precipitator in the third quarter of 2002. The replacement technology is an Advanced Hybrid technology that was installed as part of a demonstration project co-funded by the Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory Power Plant Improvement Initiative. The technology is designed to capture at least 99.99% of the fly ash particulates emitted from the boiler. Initial test data demonstrates the emissions design parameters were met. However, the Utility will continue to investigate and assess the operational performance of the unit as well as options to improve the Advanced Hybrid's balance-of-plant impacts as part of its on-going effort to refine the demonstration technology. For the $13.4 million project, the Energy Department's share is approximately $6.5 million, the Utility's share is approximately $2.9 million and the remaining portion was funded by the Big Stone Plant co-owners and other industry participants. The Big Stone Plant is currently operating within all presently applicable federal and state air quality and emission standards.

The Coyote Station is equipped with sulfur dioxide removal equipment. The removal equipment--referred to as a dry scrubber--consists of a spray dryer, followed by a fabric filter, and is designed to desulfurize hot gases from the stack. The fabric filter collects spray dryer residue along with the fly ash. The Coyote Station is currently operating within all presently applicable federal and state air quality and emission standards.

The Act, in addressing acid deposition, imposed requirements on power plants in an effort to reduce national emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx).

The national SO2 emission reduction goals are achieved through a market-based system under which power plants are allocated "emissions allowances" that will require plants to either reduce their emissions or acquire allowances from others to achieve compliance. Each allowance is an authorization to emit one ton of sulfur dioxide. Sulfur dioxide emission requirements are currently being met by all of the Utility's generating facilities without the need to acquire other allowances for compliance.

10

The national NOx emission reduction goals are achieved by imposing mandatory emissions standards on individual sources. All of the Utility's generating facilities met the NOx standards during 2002. Hoot Lake Plant unit 2 is governed by the phase one early opt-in provision until January 1, 2008. The remaining generating units meet the NOx emission regulations that were adopted by the EPA in December 1996.

The Act calls for EPA studies of the effects of emissions of listed pollutants by electric steam generating plants. The EPA has completed the studies and sent reports to Congress. The Act required that the EPA make a finding as to whether regulation of emissions of hazardous air pollutants from fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units is appropriate and necessary. On December 14, 2000 the EPA announced that it affirmatively decided to regulate mercury emissions from electric generating units. The EPA expects to propose regulations by December 2003 and issue final rules by December 2004. Because promulgation of rules by the EPA has not been completed, it is not possible to assess whether, or to what extent, this regulation will impact the Utility.

In 1998, the EPA announced its New Source Review Enforcement Initiative targeting coal-fired utilities, petroleum refineries, pulp and paper mills and other industries for alleged violations of EPA's New Source Review rules. These rules require owners or operators that construct new major sources or make major modifications to existing sources to obtain permits and install air pollution control equipment at affected facilities. The EPA is attempting to determine if emission sources violated certain provisions of the Act by making major modifications to their facilities without installing state-of-the-art pollution controls. On January 2, 2001, the Utility received a request from the EPA, pursuant to Section 114(a) of the Act, to provide certain information relative to past operation and capital construction projects at the Big Stone Plant. The Utility has responded to that request and at this time cannot determine what, if any, actions will be taken by the EPA. In December 2002, the EPA issued changes to the existing New Source Review rules. These changes are not expected to result in any significant additional costs to the Utility. The EPA also proposed changes clarifying application of certain sections of the New Source Review rules. The Utility is currently evaluating the proposal. The EPA plans to accept comments on these proposed changes in early 2003 and then undertake a new rule-making process during the next one to two years.

The Coyote Station is subject to certain emission limitations under the "Prevention of Significant Deterioration" (PSD) program of the Clean Air Act. The EPA and the North Dakota Department of Health are currently engaged in discussions about the maximum allowable increases of sulfur dioxide, which may result in imposition of a cap on the sulfur dioxide emissions from all the coal-fired steam-electric generating units that are located in North Dakota, including the Coyote Station. If a cap were imposed, it is likely the cap would be set at a level above current actual emission levels. The probable impact of a cap on sulfur dioxide emissions on future operations, if it were imposed, is uncertain.

Water Quality: The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, and amendments thereto, provide for, among other things, the imposition of effluent limitations to regulate discharges of pollutants, including thermal discharges, into the waters of the United States, and the EPA has established effluent guidelines for the steam electric power generating industry. Discharges must also comply with state water quality standards.

The Utility has all federal and state water permits presently necessary for the operation of the Big Stone and Hoot Lake Plants. The water discharge permit for the Coyote Station was renewed in 1998 for a five-year term. The Utility has filed the permit renewal application for Coyote Station and believes that since there are no significant issues with the renewal request, it will receive a renewed permit in due course. The Utility owns five small dams on the Otter Tail River, which are subject to FERC licensing

11

requirements. A license for all five dams was issued on December 5, 1991. Total nameplate rating (manufacturer's expected output) of the five dams is 3,450 kw.

Solid Waste: Permits for disposal of ash and other solid wastes have been issued for the Coyote Station and the Big Stone Plant. The Hoot Lake Plant permit was under public notice until January 17, 2003 and the Utility expects that the permit will be issued shortly. The Utility estimates that the current ash disposal site at the Hoot Lake Plant will be filled to capacity within approximately one year. The Utility plans to increase marketing of the ash for construction purposes and to build a new ash disposal site adjacent to the current site within the same permitted area in 2003. An estimate of the engineering costs required to construct a new facility has been completed. On that basis, the Utility believes that the investment required will not have a significant impact on future plant operating costs.

At the request of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Utility has an ongoing investigation at its former, closed Hoot Lake Plant ash disposal sites. The MPCA continues to monitor site activities under their Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program. In April 2001, the Utility submitted a Remedial Investigation Work Plan to the MPCA describing its plan to further investigate the environmental impact of the closed portion of the Hoot Lake Plant ash disposal site. The MPCA approved the plan, with some suggested modifications, in July 2001. These tasks have been completed. The MPCA also asked that the Utility eliminate a ground water seepage that was originating from one of the disposal areas. Site work relating to that request was completed in November 2001. However, seepage reappeared in a new location in the spring of 2002. The Utility initiated additional studies to further characterize the site and its report was submitted to the MPCA in March 2003 for their review and comment. Although the Utility is still evaluating various options, its preliminary estimate of remediation costs to address the ash disposal site issues over the next three years is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

The EPA has promulgated various solid and hazardous waste regulations and guidelines pursuant to, among other laws, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, the Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of 1980 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, which provide for, among other things, the comprehensive control of various solid and hazardous wastes from generation to final disposal. The States of Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota have also adopted rules and regulations pertaining to solid and hazardous waste. The total impact on the Utility of the various solid and hazardous waste statutes and regulations enacted by the federal government or the States of Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota is not certain at this time. To date, the Utility has incurred no significant costs as a result of these laws.

In 1980, the United States enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as the Federal Superfund law, which was reauthorized and amended in 1986. In 1983, Minnesota adopted the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act, commonly known as the Minnesota Superfund law. In 1988, South Dakota enacted the Regulated Substance Discharges Act, commonly known as the South Dakota Superfund law. In 1989, North Dakota enacted the Environmental Emergency Cost Recovery Act. Among other requirements, the federal and state acts establish environmental response funds to pay for remedial actions associated with the release or threatened release of certain regulated substances into the environment. These federal and state Superfund laws also establish liability for cleanup costs and damage to the environment resulting from such release or threatened release of regulated substances. The Minnesota Superfund law also creates liability for personal injury and economic loss under certain circumstances. The Utility is unable to determine the total impact of the Superfund laws on its operations at this time but has not incurred any significant costs to date related to these laws. The Utility is not presently named as a potentially

12

responsible party under the federal or state Superfund laws.

Capital Expenditures

The Utility is continually expanding, replacing and improving its electric facilities. During 2002, approximately $45.8 million was invested for additions and replacements to its electric utility properties, including $16 million for continuing work on the new gas-fired combustion turbine and $7 million for completion of the Company-owned portion of a large transmission line project in North Dakota. During the five years ended December 31, 2002 gross electric property additions, including construction work in progress, were approximately $146.9 million and gross retirements were approximately $43.0 million.

The Utility estimates that during the five-year period 2003-2007 it will invest approximately $146 million for electric construction. The Utility continuously reviews options for increasing its generating capacity. While at this time the Utility has no firm plans for additional base load generating plant construction, the Utility has under construction a gas-fired combustion turbine expected to be operational by June 1, 2003. Most of the costs related to the construction of the gas-fired combustion turbine occurred in 2002. The majority of electric utility expenditures for the five-year period 2003 through 2007 will be for work related to the Utility's production plants and distribution system.

Franchises

At December 31, 2002 the Utility had franchises to operate as an electric utility in all of the 371 incorporated municipalities that it serves. All franchises are nonexclusive and generally were obtained for 20-year terms, with varying expiration dates. No franchises are required to serve unincorporated communities in any of the three states that the Utility serves.

Employees

At December 31, 2002 the Utility had approximately 728 full-time employees. A total of 365 employees are represented by local unions of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and are covered by a three-year labor contract expiring November 1, 2005. The Utility has not experienced any strike, work stoppage or strike vote, and considers its present relations with employees to be good.

PLASTICS

General

Plastics consists of businesses producing polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe. The Company derived 12% of its consolidated operating revenues from this segment in 2002, 10% in 2001 and 14% in 2000.

The following is a brief description of these businesses:

Northern Pipe Products, Inc., located in Fargo, ND, manufactures and sells PVC pipe for municipal, rural water, irrigation and other uses in the Upper Midwest region of the United States.

Vinyltech Corporation, located in Phoenix, AZ, manufactures and sells PVC pipe for municipal, rural water, irrigation and other uses in the West, Southwest and South-central regions of the United States.

Together these companies have the capacity to produce approximately 170 million pounds of PVC pipe annually.

13

Customers

The PVC pipe products are marketed through a combination of independent sales representatives, company salespersons and customer service representatives. Customers for the PVC pipe products consist primarily of wholesalers and distributors throughout the Upper Midwest, Southwest and Western United States.

Competition

The plastic pipe industry is highly competitive, due to a relatively small number of producers, an even smaller number of raw material suppliers and the commodity nature of the product. Because of shipping costs, competition is usually regional in scope, instead of national. Northern Pipe and Vinyltech compete not only against other plastic pipe manufacturers, but also ductile iron, steel, concrete and clay pipe producers. Pricing pressure will continue to affect operating margins in the future.

Northern Pipe and Vinyltech intend to continue to compete on the basis of their high quality products, cost-effective production techniques and close customer relations and support.

Manufacturing and Resin Supply

PVC pipe is manufactured through a process known as extrusion. During the production process, PVC compound (a dry powder-like substance) is introduced into an extrusion machine, where it is heated to a molten state and then forced through a sizing apparatus to produce the pipe. The newly extruded pipe is then pulled through a series of water cooling tanks, marked to identify the type of pipe and cut to finished lengths. Warehouse and outdoor storage facilities are used to store the finished product. Inventory is shipped from storage to customers mainly by common carrier.

The PVC resins are acquired in bulk and shipped to point of use by rail car. Over the last ten years, there has been consolidation in PVC resin producers. There are a limited number of third party vendors that supply the PVC resin used by Northern Pipe and Vinyltech. During 2002, seven vendors supplied the resin used, with over 58% of the resin purchased from two main vendors. During 2001 and 2000, two vendors provided approximately 75% of the PVC resin used. The loss of a key vendor, or any interruption or delay in the supply of PVC resin could disrupt the ability of the Plastics segment to manufacture products, cause customers to cancel orders or require incurrence of additional expenses to obtain PVC resin from alternative sources, if such sources were available. Both Northern Pipe and Vinyltech believe they have good relationships with their key raw material vendors.

Due to the commodity nature of PVC resin and PVC pipe and the dynamic supply and demand factors worldwide, historically the markets for both PVC resin and PVC pipe have been very cyclical with significant fluctuations in prices and gross margins.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures in the Plastics segment typically include investments in extrusion machines, land and buildings and management information systems. During 2002, capital expenditures of approximately $6 million were made in the Plastics segment. Expenditures during 2002 included the purchase of land and buildings by Vinyltech that were previously being leased. Total capital expenditures during the five-year period 2003-2007 are estimated to be approximately $14 million.

During 2003, Northern Pipe will be opening a new polyethylene (PE) pipe plant in Hampton, IA. This new operation will require approximately $3.5 million in pipe production equipment. Production of PE pipe will be a new product line for the Plastics segment and will allow Northern Pipe to provide

14

its customers with additional product choices. The production process will require using a new type of resin that will be purchased from different vendors than those who provide the PVC resin. The new plant is expected to be producing PE pipe by April 1, 2003.

Employees

At December 31, 2002 the Plastics segment had approximately 163 full-time employees.

MANUFACTURING

General

Manufacturing consists of businesses in the following manufacturing activities: production of waterfront equipment, wind towers, frame-straightening equipment and accessories for the auto repair industry, custom plastic pallets, material and handling trays and horticultural containers; fabrication of steel products; contract machining; and metal parts stamping and fabrication.

During 2002, two acquisitions were completed in this segment. In May, the Company acquired the stock of ShoreMaster, Inc. and in October the Company acquired the stock of Galva Foam Marine Industries, Inc. During 2002, Precision Machine, Inc. was merged into BTD Manufacturing, Inc.

The Company derived 20% of its consolidated operating revenues from this segment in 2002, 19% in 2001 and 17% in 2000. The following is a brief description of each of these businesses:

BTD Manufacturing, Inc. (BTD), located in Detroit Lakes and Pelican Rapids, MN, is a metal stamping and tool and die manufacturer that provides its services mainly to customers in the Midwest. BTD stamps, fabricates, welds and laser cuts metal components according to manufacturers' specifications primarily for the recreation vehicle, gas fireplace, health and fitness and enclosure industries.

Chassis Liner Corporation, located in Alexandria and Lucan, MN, manufactures and markets vehicle frame-straightening equipment and accessories used by the auto repair industry throughout the United States.

DMI Industries Inc.(DMI), located in West Fargo, ND, engineers and manufactures towers for the wind energy industry throughout the United States.

T.O. Plastics, Inc., located in Minneapolis and Clearwater, MN, and Hampton, SC, manufactures and sells plastic thermoformed products for the horticulture industry throughout the United States. In addition, T.O. Plastics produces products such as clamshell packing, blister packs, returnable pallets and handling trays for shipping and storing odd-shaped or difficult-to-handle parts for other industries.

ShoreMaster, Inc., located in Fergus Falls, MN, along with its wholly owned subsidiary, Galva Foam Marine, Inc. located in Camdenton, MO, produce and market residential and commercial waterfront equipment, ranging from boatlifts and docks to full marina systems throughout the United States.

St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc., located in St. George and Salt Lake City, UT, fabricates structural steel members for buildings and bridges, ductwork for the power and refining industries, conveyors and hoppers for mining and industrial markets and plate steel products for the wind tower industry, primarily for customers in the Western United States.

15

Competition

The various markets in which the Manufacturing segment entities compete are characterized by intense competition. These markets have many established manufacturers with broader product lines, greater distribution capabilities, greater capital resources and larger marketing, research and development staffs and facilities than the Company's manufacturing entities.

The Company believes the principal competitive factors in its Manufacturing segment are product performance, quality, price, ease of use, technical innovation, cost effectiveness, customer service and breadth of product line. The Company's manufacturing entities intend to continue to compete on the basis of their high-performance products, innovative technologies, cost-effective manufacturing techniques, close customer relations and support, and their strategy of increasing product offerings.

Some of the products sold by the companies in the Manufacturing segment are purchased by companies in the recreational vehicle, wind energy and auto repair markets. A downturn in these markets could have an adverse impact on the financial results of the Company's Manufacturing segment.

Legislation

The failure of Congress to pass a broad energy bill in 2003 could have an unfavorable impact on the Company's operations that manufacture towers for the wind energy industry.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures in the Manufacturing segment typically include additional investments in new manufacturing equipment or expenditures to replace worn-out manufacturing equipment. Capital expenditures may also be made in the purchase of land and buildings for plant expansion and investments in management information systems. During 2002, capital expenditures of approximately $15 million were made in the Manufacturing segment. In 2002, structural modifications and new equipment was purchased at BTD in connection with an $8.7 million plant expansion and $3.8 million was spent on a plant expansion at
DMI. Total capital expenditures for the Manufacturing segment during the five-year period 2003-2007 are estimated to be approximately $45 million.

Employees

At December 31, 2002 the Manufacturing segment had approximately 1,060 full-time employees.

HEALTH SERVICES

General

Health Services consists of the DMS Health Group, which includes businesses involved in the sale of diagnostic medical equipment, supplies and accessories. These businesses also provide service maintenance, mobile and fixed-based diagnostic services, portable X-ray imaging and interim rental of diagnostic medical imaging equipment.

During 2002, two acquisitions were completed in this segment. In May 2002, the Company acquired the stock of Computed Imaging Service, Inc. On November 1, 2002 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Mobile Diagnostic Services, Inc.

16

The Company derived 13% of its consolidated operating revenues from this segment in 2002, 12% in 2001 and 11% in 2000. The companies comprising the DMS Health Group include:

DMS Health Technologies, Inc., located in Fargo, ND, sells, services and refurbishes diagnostic medical imaging equipment and related supplies and accessories. DMS sells radiology equipment primarily manufactured by Philips Medical Systems (Philips), a large multi-national company based in the Netherlands. Philips manufactures fluoroscopic, radiographic and mammography equipment, along with ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT) scanners, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners and cardiac cath labs. DMS is also a supplier of medical film and related accessories. DMS markets mainly to hospitals, clinics and mobile service companies in North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Montana and Wyoming.

DMS Imaging, Inc., a subsidiary of DMS Health Technologies, Inc. located in Osseo, MN, operates mobile and in-house diagnostic medical imaging equipment, including CT, MRI, positron-emission tomography (PET), nuclear medicine services and other similar radiology services to hospitals, clinics, long-term care facilities and other medical providers located in 40 states. During 2002, regional offices were designated in Houston, TX; Minneapolis, MN; and Sioux Falls, SD. DMS Imaging provides services in four different business units:

o DMS Imaging - provides shared diagnostic medical imaging services (primarily mobile) for MRI, CT, nuclear medicine, PET, ultrasound, mammography and bone density analysis.

o DMS Interim Solutions - offers interim and rental options for diagnostic imaging services.

o DMS MedSource Partners - develops partnerships with healthcare providers to offer dedicated diagnostic imaging services, such as MRI.

o DMS Portable X-Ray - delivers portable X-ray, ultrasound and electrocardiogram services to nursing homes and other facilities.

Combined, the DMS Health Group covers the three basics of the medical imaging industry: (1) ownership and operation of the imaging equipment for healthcare providers; (2) sale, lease and/or maintenance of medical imaging equipment and related supplies; and (3) scheduling, billing and administrative support of medical imaging services.

Regulation

The healthcare industry is subject to federal and state regulations relating to licensure, conduct of operation, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and services and payment of services.

The federal Anti-Kickback Act prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce the referral of an individual or the furnishing or arranging for a good or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. Several states have similar statutes. The term "remuneration" has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including, for example, gifts, discounts, credit arrangements, payments of cash, waiver of payments and ownership interests. Penalties for violating the Anti-Kickback Act can include both criminal penalties and civil sanctions. By regulation, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has created certain "safe harbors" under the Act. These safe harbor regulations set forth certain provisions, which, if met, assure that healthcare providers will not be subject to liability under the Act.

The Ethics and Patient Referral Act of 1989 (the Stark Act) prohibits physician referrals of Medicare and Medicaid patients to an entity providing certain designated health services, including services provided by the Health

17

Services companies. The Stark Act also prohibits an entity from billing for prohibited services. A person who engages in a scheme to violate the Stark Act or a person who presents a claim to Medicare or Medicaid in violation of the Stark Act may be subject to civil fines and possible exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs.

The Health Services companies believe that their operations comply with the Anti-Kickback Act and the Stark Act. However, if the Health Services companies were to engage in conduct in violation of these statutes, the sanction imposed could adversely affect the Company's financial results.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA) created federal crimes related to healthcare fraud and to making false statements related to healthcare matters. HIPPA prohibits knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program including a program involving private payers. Further, HIPPA prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits or services. A violation of HIPPA is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment or exclusion from government-sponsored programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Finally, HIPPA creates federal privacy standards for individually identifiable health information and computer security standards for all health information. These standards become applicable in 2003. The Health Services companies believe that they are in compliance and will be in compliance with the requirements of HIPPA. However, if the Health Services companies were to engage in conduct in violation of these statutes, the sanction imposed could adversely affect the Company's financial results.

In some states a certificate of need or similar regulatory approval is required prior to the acquisition of high-cost capital items or services, including diagnostic imaging systems or provisions of diagnostic imaging services by companies or its customers. Certificate of need laws were enacted to contain rising healthcare costs by preventing unnecessary duplication of health resources. Certificate of need regulations may limit or preclude the Health Services companies from providing diagnostic imaging services or systems. Conversely, a repeal of existing certificate of need regulations in states where the Health Services companies have obtained certificates of need could adversely affect their financial performance.

The Health Services companies continue to monitor developments in healthcare law and modify their operations from time to time as the business and regulatory environment changes. However, there can be no assurances that the Health Services companies will always be able to modify their operations to address changes in the regulatory environment without any adverse effect to their financial performance.

Reimbursement

The companies in the Health Services segment derive most of their revenues directly from healthcare providers rather than third-party payers, such as Medicare, Medicaid or private health insurance companies. The Health Services' customers who are healthcare providers receive the majority of their payments from third-party payors. Payments by third-party payors depend upon their policies. Because unfavorable reimbursement policies have limited and may continue to limit the profit margins of hospitals and clinics the Health Services companies bill directly, it may be necessary to lower fees to retain existing customers and attract new ones.

Competition

The market for selling, servicing and operating diagnostic imaging services and imaging systems is highly competitive. In addition to direct competition from other contract providers, the companies within Health Services compete with free-standing imaging centers and health care providers

18

that have their own diagnostic imaging systems and with equipment manufacturers that sell imaging equipment to healthcare providers for full-time installation. Some of the direct competitors, which provide contract MRI services, have access to greater financial resources than the Health Services companies. In addition, some of Health Services' customers are capable of providing the same services to their patients directly, subject only to their decision to acquire a high-cost diagnostic imaging system, assume the financial and technology risk, and employ the necessary technologies. The companies in the Health Services segment may also experience greater competition in states that currently have certificate of needs laws should these laws be repealed, reducing barriers to entry in that state. The companies within this segment compete against other contract providers on the basis of quality of services, quality and magnetic field strength of imaging systems, relationships with health care providers, knowledge and service quality of technologists, price, availability and reliability.

Environmental, Health or Safety Laws

Positron emission tomography services and some other imaging services require the use of radioactive material. While this material has a short life and quickly breaks down into inert, or non-radioactive substances, using such materials presents the risk of accidental environmental contamination and physical injury. Federal, state and local regulations govern the storage, use and disposal of radioactive material and waste products. The Company believes that its safety procedures for storing, handling and disposing of these hazardous materials comply with the standards prescribed by law and regulation; however the risk of accidental contamination or injury from those hazardous materials cannot be completely eliminated. The companies in the Health Services segment have not had any material expenses related to environmental, health or safety laws or regulations.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures in this segment principally relate to the acquisition of diagnostic imaging equipment used in the mobile imaging business. During 2002, capital expenditures of approximately $4 million were made in the Health Services segment. Total capital expenditures during the five-year period 2003-2007 are estimated to be approximately $9 million. Operating leases are also used to finance the acquisition of medical equipment used by Health Services companies. Operating lease payments during the five-year period 2003-2007 are estimated to be $48 million.

Employees

At December 31, 2002 the Health Services segment had approximately 440 full-time employees.

OTHER BUSINESS OPERATIONS

General

Other Business Operations consists of businesses engaged in electrical and telephone construction contracting, transportation, telecommunications, entertainment and energy services and natural gas marketing as well as the portion of corporate administrative and general expenses that are not allocated to the other segments. The Company derived 12% of its consolidated operating revenues from these businesses in 2002 and 2001 and 13% in 2000.

The following is a brief description of each of these businesses:

Midwest Construction Services, Inc., is a holding company for three subsidiaries: Aerial Contractors, Inc., located in West Fargo, ND; Moorhead Electric, Inc., located in Moorhead, MN; and Dakota Direct Control, Inc., located in Sioux Falls, SD. Services provided in the Upper Midwest by these companies include electric contracting for

19

industrial, commercial and healthcare sites; installing data network cabling as well as underground copper cable and fiber optics; constructing and repairing overhead and underground electric distribution and transmission lines and substations; and providing building control systems including heating/cooling and security systems.

Midwest Information Systems, Inc., headquartered in Parkers Prairie, MN, provides telephone, cable and internet services with over 9,900 access lines for phone, internet and cable television to homes in rural western Minnesota communities through its subsidiaries Midwest Telephone Company, Osakis Telephone Company, Peoples Telephone Company of Big Fork and Data Video Systems, Inc.

Otter Tail Energy Services Company, headquartered in Fergus Falls, MN, was established in 1997 to provide unregulated energy-based products and services to commercial, industrial and institutional clients throughout the Upper Midwest. It offers technical and engineering services, energy efficient lighting, water conservation, performance-based service contracting and financial services centered on the management and reduction in demand and consumption of gas, electric and water/sewer utilities. Otter Tail Energy Services Company owns one subsidiary, Otter Tail Energy Management Company, which is a retail marketer of natural gas and energy management services to commercial, industrial and institutional customers in Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota and Minnesota.

E. W. Wylie Corporation (Wylie), located in Fargo, ND, is a contract and common carrier operating a fleet of tractors and trailers in 48 states and 6 Canadian provinces. During 2002, Wylie opened new trucking terminals in Des Moines, IA, and Fort Worth, TX, to expand freight brokerage businesses.

Regulation

The telephone subsidiaries are subject to the regulatory authority of the MPUC regarding rates and charges for telephone services, as well as other matters. The telephone subsidiaries must keep on file with the MPUC schedules of such rates and charges, and any requests for changes in such rates and charges must be filed for approval by the MPUC. The telephone industry is also subject generally to rules and regulations promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission. The cable television subsidiary is regulated by federal and local authorities.

Competition

Each of the businesses in Other Business Operations is subject to competition, as well as the effects of general economic conditions in their respective industries. The construction companies in this segment must compete with other construction companies in the Upper Midwest when bidding on new projects. The Company believes the principal competitive factors in the construction segment are price, quality of work and customer services.

The trucking industry, in which Wylie competes, is highly competitive. Wylie competes primarily with other short- to medium-haul, flatbed truckload carriers, internal shipping conducted by existing and potential customers and, to a lesser extent, railroads. Competition for the freight transported by Wylie is based primarily on service and efficiency and to a lesser degree, on freight rates. There are other trucking companies that have greater financial resources, operate more equipment or carry a larger volume of freight than Wylie and these companies compete with Wylie for qualified drivers.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures in this segment typically include investments in additional trucks and flat bed trailers, infrastructure to support the

20

telephone, cable and internet services and construction equipment. During 2002, capital expenditures of approximately $5 million were made in Other Business Operations. Capital expenditures during the five-year period 2003-2007 are estimated to be approximately $26 million for Other Business Operations. Almost all of the $26 million will be used to replace existing equipment with the majority to be invested in the transportation and telecommunication companies.

Employees

At December 31, 2002 there were approximately 720 full-time employees in Other Business Operations. 84 employees of Moorhead Electric, Inc. are represented by local unions of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and are covered by a two-year labor contract expiring May 31, 2003. Moorhead Electric, Inc. has not experienced any strike, work stoppage or strike vote, and considers its present relations with employees to be good.

Forward Looking Information -- Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act), the Company has filed cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. When used in this Form 10-K and in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Company's press releases and in oral statements, words such as "may", "will", "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "project", "believes" or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act and are included, along with this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provision of the Act. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, the Company's ongoing involvement in diversification efforts, the timing and scope of deregulation and open competition, growth of electric revenues, impact of the investment performance of the Utility's pension plan, changes in the economy, governmental and regulatory action, weather conditions, fuel and purchased power costs, environmental issues, resin prices, and other factors discussed under "Critical Accounting Policies Involving Significant Estimates" and "Factors Affecting Future Earnings" on pages 24 through 28 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto. These factors are in addition to any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or referred to in connection with any such forward-looking statement or contained in any subsequent filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Coyote Station, which commenced operation in 1981, is a 414,000 kw (nameplate rating) mine-mouth plant located in the lignite coal fields near Beulah, North Dakota and is jointly owned by the Utility, Northern Municipal Power Agency, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Northwestern Public Service Company. The Utility owns 35% of the plant and on July 1, 1998, became the operating agent of the Coyote Station.

The Utility, jointly with Northwestern Public Service Company and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., owns the 414,000 kw (nameplate rating) Big Stone Plant in northeastern South Dakota which commenced operation in 1975. The Utility is the operating agent of Big Stone Plant and owns 53.9% of the plant.

Located near Fergus Falls, Minnesota, the Hoot Lake Plant is comprised of three separate generating units with a combined nameplate rating of 127,000 kw. The oldest Hoot Lake Plant generating unit was constructed in 1948 (7,500 kw nameplate rating) and a subsequent unit was added in 1959 (53,500 kw

21

nameplate rating). A third unit was added in 1964 (66,000 kw nameplate rating) and later modified during 1988 to provide cycling capability, allowing this unit to be more efficiently brought on-line from a standby mode.

At December 31, 2002, the Utility's transmission facilities, which are interconnected with lines of other public utilities, consisted of 48 miles of 345 kv lines; 403 miles of 230 kv lines; 727 miles of 115 kv lines; and 4,133 miles of lower voltage lines, principally 41.6 kv. The Utility owns the uprated portion of the 48 miles of the 345 kv line, with Minnkota Power Cooperative retaining title to the original 230 kv construction.

In addition to the properties mentioned above, the Company owns and has investments in offices and service buildings. The Company's subsidiaries own facilities and equipment used to manufacture PVC pipe and perform metal stamping, fabricating and contract machining; construction equipment and tools; medical imaging equipment; a fleet of flatbed trucks and trailers; and the infrastructure to maintain approximately 9,900 access lines for phone, internet and cable television in its telecommunication companies.

Management of the Company believes the facilities and equipment described above are adequate for the Company's present businesses.

All of the common shares of the companies owned by Varistar are pledged to secure indebtedness of Varistar.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Not Applicable.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended December 31, 2002.

Item 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT (AS OF MARCH 1, 2003)

Set forth below is a summary of the principal occupations and business experience during the past five years of executive officers of the Company. Except as noted below, each of the executive officers has been employed by the Company for more than five years in an executive or management position either with the Company or its wholly owned subsidiary, Varistar.

                          DATES ELECTED
NAME AND AGE                TO OFFICE     PRESENT POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
-------------             -------------   ----------------------------------------

John D. Erickson (44)         4/8/02      Present: President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer

                              4/9/01      President

                             4/10/00      Executive Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

                            10/26/98      Vice President, Finance and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                            Prior to      Director, Market
                            10/26/98      Strategies & Regulation


                                       22


                          DATES ELECTED
NAME AND AGE                TO OFFICE     PRESENT POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
-------------             -------------   ----------------------------------------


George A. Koeck (50)         4/10/00      Present: Corporate Secretary
                                                   and General Counsel

                              8/2/99      General Counsel

                            Prior to
                              8/2/99      Partner, Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Lauris N. Molbert (45)       6/10/02      Present: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Operating Officer

                              4/9/01      Executive Vice President, Corporate
                                          Development and Varistar President and
                                          Chief Operating Officer

                             4/10/00      Vice President, Chief Operating
                                          Officer, Varistar; President and Chief
                                          Operating Officer, Varistar

                            Prior to      President and Chief Operating
                             4/10/00      Officer, Varistar

Kevin G. Moug (43)            4/9/01      Present: Chief Financial Officer and
                                                   Treasurer

                            Prior to      Varistar Chief Financial Officer
                              4/9/01      and Treasurer

The term of office of each of the officers is one year. Any officer elected may be removed by the vote of the Board of Directors at any time during the term. There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the first sentence under "Otter Tail Corporation Stock Listing" on Page 53, to "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" on Page 17 and to "Quarterly Information" on Page 49 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" on Page 17 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" on Pages 18 through 30 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

23

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" on Page 30 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to "Quarterly Information" on Page 49 and the Company's audited financial statements on Pages 31 through 49 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders excluding "Report of Management" on Page 31, filed as an Exhibit hereto.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this Item regarding Directors is incorporated by reference to the information under "Election of Directors" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2003. The information regarding executive officers is set forth in Item 4A hereto. The information regarding Section 16 reporting is incorporated by reference to the information under "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2003.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information under "Summary Compensation Table," "Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Options/SAR Values," "Pension and Supplemental Retirement Plans," "Severance and Employment Agreements," and "Director Compensation" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2003.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The security ownership information set forth under "Outstanding Voting Shares" and "Management's Security Ownership" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference.

24

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2002 about the Company's common stock that may be issued under all of its equity compensation plans:

                                  Number of securities to be      Weighted-average         Number of securities remaining
                                    issued upon exercise of       exercise price of      available for future issuance under
                                 outstanding options, warrants  outstanding options,    equity compensation plans (excluding
        Plan Category                     and rights             warrants and rights     securities reflected in column (a))
------------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------ --------------------------------------
                                             (a)                         (b)                             (c)

Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders

 1999 Stock
 Incentive Plan                           1,360,721                    $24.68                        930,602 (1)

 1999 Employee
 Stock Purchase Plan                         --                          N/A                         231,761 (2)

Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders                 --                          --                              --
                                ------------------------------ ------------------------ --------------------------------------

Total                                     1,360,721                    $24.68                         1,162,363
                                ============================== ======================== ======================================


        (1)  The 1999 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of any shares
             available under the plan in the form of restricted stock, performance
             awards and other types of stock-based awards, in addition to the granting
             of options, warrants or stock appreciation rights.

        (2)  Shares are issued based on employees' election to participate in the plan.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

None.

Item 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of a date (the "Evaluation Date") within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation.

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) List of documents filed:

(1) and (2) See Table of Contents on Page 29 hereof.

25

(3) See Exhibit Index on Pages 30 through 35 hereof.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, copies of certain instruments defining the rights of holders of certain long-term debt of the Company are not filed, and in lieu thereof, the Company agrees to furnish copies thereof to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

By /s/ Kevin G. Moug
   -------------------------------------
   Kevin G. Moug
   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Dated:  March 26, 2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature and Title
-------------------                                          
John D. Erickson                                 )
  President and                                  )
  Chief Executive Officer                        )
  (principal executive officer)                  )
                                                 )
Kevin G. Moug                                    )
  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer          )
  (principal financial and accounting officer)   )
                                                 )   By  /s/ John D. Erickson
                                                 ) -----------------------------
John C. MacFarlane                               )       John D. Erickson
  Chairman of the Board and Director             )  Pro Se and Attorney-in-Fact
                                                 )      Dated March 26, 2003
Thomas M. Brown, Director                        )
                                                 )
Dennis R. Emmen, Director                        )
                                                 )
Maynard D. Helgaas, Director                     )
                                                 )
Arvid R. Liebe, Director                         )
                                                 )
Kenneth L. Nelson, Director                      )
                                                 )
Nathan I. Partain, Director                      )
                                                 )
Gary J. Spies, Director                          )
                                                 )
Robert N. Spolum, Director                       )

26

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John D. Erickson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Otter Tail Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 26, 2003

/s/ John D. Erickson
-------------------------------------
John D. Erickson
President and Chief Executive Officer

27

I, Kevin G. Moug, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Otter Tail Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 26, 2003

/s/ Kevin G. Moug
-------------------------------------
Kevin G. Moug
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

28

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA,
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL SCHEDULES INCLUDED IN ANNUAL REPORT
(FORM 10-K) FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2002

The following items are included in this annual report by reference to the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002:

                                                                   Page in
                                                                   Annual
                                                                   Report to
                                                                   Shareholders
                                                                   ------------
Financial Statements:

   Independent Auditors' Report.........................................31

   Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2002 and 2001.........32 & 33

   Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Years
   Ended December 31, 2002..............................................34

   Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders' Equity for the
   Three Years Ended December 31, 2002..................................35

   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years
   Ended December 31, 2002..............................................36

   Consolidated Statements of Capitalization, December 31, 2002
   and 2001 ............................................................37

   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................38-49

Selected Consolidated Financial Data for the Five Years
      Ended December 31, 2002...........................................17

Quarterly Data for the Two Years Ended
      December 31, 2002 ................................................49

Schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required, because the amounts are insignificant or because the information required is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

29

EXHIBIT INDEX
TO
ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K
FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

                  PREVIOUSLY FILED
              -------------------------------
                                        AS
                                      EXHIBIT
              FILE NO.                  NO.
              -------------          --------

3-A           8-K                      3          -- Restated Articles of
              dated 4/10/01                       Incorporation, as amended
                                                  (including resolutions
                                                  creating outstanding series
                                                  of Cumulative Preferred Shares).

3-C           33-46071                 4-B        -- Bylaws as amended through
                                                  April 11, 1988.

4-D-1         8-A dated                1          -- Rights Agreement, dated as of
              1/28/97                             January 28, 1997 (the Rights
                                                  Agreement), between the
                                                  Company and Norwest Bank Minnesota,
                                                  National Association.

4-D-2         8-A/A dated              1          -- Amendment No. 1, dated as of
              9/29/98                             August 24, 1998, to the Rights
                                                  Agreement.

4-D-3         10-K for year            4-D-7      -- Note Purchase Agreement dated
              ended 12/31/01                      as of December 1, 2001.

4-D-4                                             -- First Amendment dated as
                                                  of December 1, 2002 to Note
                                                  Purchase Agreement dated as
                                                  of December 1, 2001.

4-D-5         333-90952                99-A-1     -- Credit Agreement dated as of
                                                  April 30, 2002.

4-D-6         8-K dated                99-A       -- First Amendment dated as of
              9/27/02                             September 19, 2002 to Credit
                                                  Agreement dated as of April 30, 2002.

10-A          2-39794                  4-C        -- Integrated Transmission
                                                  Agreement dated August 25,
                                                  1967, between Cooperative
                                                  Power Association and the
                                                  Company.

10-A-1        10-K for year            10-A-1     -- Amendment No. 1, dated as
              ended 12/31/92                      of September 6, 1979, to
                                                  Integrated Transmission
                                                  Agreement, dated as of
                                                  August 25, 1967, between
                                                  Cooperative Power
                                                  Association and the
                                                  Company.

10-A-2        10-K for year            10-A-2     -- Amendment No. 2, dated as of
              ended 12/31/92                      November 19, 1986, to Integrated
                                                  Transmission Agreement between
                                                  Cooperative Power Association
                                                  and the Company.

30

                  PREVIOUSLY FILED
              -------------------------------
                                        AS
                                      EXHIBIT
              FILE NO.                  NO.
              -------------          --------


10-C-1        2-55813                  5-E        -- Contract dated July 1, 1958,
                                                  between Central Power Electric
                                                  Corporation, Inc., and the Company.

10-C-2        2-55813                  5-E-1      -- Supplement Seven dated
                                                  November 21, 1973.
                                                  (Supplements Nos. One through
                                                  Six have been superseded
                                                  and are no longer in effect.)

10-C-3        2-55813                  5-E-2      -- Amendment No. 1 dated
                                                  December 19, 1973, to
                                                  Supplement Seven.

10-C-4        10-K for year            10-C-4     -- Amendment No. 2 dated
              ended 12/31/91                      June 17, 1986, to Supplement
                                                  Seven.

10-C-5        10-K for year            10-C-5     -- Amendment No. 3 dated
              ended 12/31/92                      June 18, 1992, to Supplement
                                                  Seven.

10-C-6        10-K for year            10-C-6     -- Amendment No. 4 dated
              ended 12/31/93                      January 18, 1994, to Supplement
                                                  Seven.

10-D          2-55813                  5-F        -- Contract dated April 12,
                                                  1973, between the Bureau of
                                                  Reclamation and the Company.

10-E-1        2-55813                  5-G        -- Contract dated January 8,
                                                  1973, between East River
                                                  Electric Power Cooperative
                                                  and the Company.

10-E-2        2-62815                  5-E-1      -- Supplement One dated
                                                  February 20, 1978.

10-E-3        10-K for year            10-E-3     -- Supplement Two dated
              ended 12/31/89                      June 10, 1983.

10-E-4        10-K for year            10-E-4     -- Supplement Three dated
              ended 12/31/90                      June 6, 1985.

10-E-5        10-K for year            10-E-5     -- Supplement No. Four, dated
              ended 12/31/92                      as of September 10, 1986.

10-E-6        10-K for year            10-E-6     -- Supplement No. Five, dated
              ended 12/31/92                      as of January 7, 1993.

10-E-7        10-K for year            10-E-7     -- Supplement No. Six, dated
              ended 12/31/93                      as of December 2, 1993.

31

                  PREVIOUSLY FILED
              -------------------------------
                                        AS
                                      EXHIBIT
              FILE NO.                  NO.
              -------------          --------


10-F          10-K for year            10-F      -- Agreement for Sharing
              ended 12/31/89                     Ownership of Generating
                                                 Plant by and between the
                                                 Company, Montana-Dakota
                                                 Utilities Co., and North-
                                                 western Public Service
                                                 Company (dated as of
                                                 January 7, 1970).

10-F-1        10-K for year            10-F-1    -- Letter of Intent for
              ended 12/31/89                     purchase of share of Big Stone
                                                 Plant from Northwestern
                                                 Public Service Company
                                                 (dated as of May 8, 1984).

10-F-2        10-K for year            10-F-2    -- Supplemental Agreement No. 1
              ended 12/31/91                     to Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Big Stone Plant
                                                 (dated as of July 1, 1983).

10-F-3        10-K for year            10-F-3    -- Supplemental Agreement No. 2
              ended 12/31/91                     to Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Big Stone Plant
                                                 (dated as of March 1, 1985).

10-F-4        10-K for year            10-F-4    -- Supplemental Agreement No. 3
              ended 12/31/91                     to Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Big Stone Plant
                                                 (dated as of March 31, 1986).

10-F-5        10-K for year            10-F-5    -- Amendment I to Letter of
              ended 12/31/92                     Intent dated May 8, 1984, for
                                                 purchase of share of Big Stone
                                                 Plant.

10-G          10-Q for quarter         10-B      -- Big Stone Plant Coal Agreements
              ended 09/30/01                     by and between the Company, Northwestern
                                                 Public Service, Montana-Dakota
                                                 Utilities Co., and RAG Coal West, Inc.
                                                 (dated as of September 28, 2001).

10-H          2-61043                  5-H       -- Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Coyote Station
                                                 Generating Unit No. 1 by and
                                                 between the Company, Minnkota
                                                 Power Cooperative, Inc.,
                                                 Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.,
                                                 Northwestern Public Service
                                                 Company, and Minnesota Power
                                                 & Light Company (dated as of
                                                 July 1, 1977).

10-H-1        10-K for year            10-H-1    -- Supplemental Agreement No.
              ended 12/31/89                     One dated as of November 30,
                                                 1978, to Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Coyote Generating
                                                 Unit No. 1.

32

                  PREVIOUSLY FILED
              -------------------------------
                                        AS
                                      EXHIBIT
              FILE NO.                  NO.
              -------------          --------



10-H-2        10-K for year            10-H-2    -- Supplemental Agreement No.
              ended 12/31/89                     Two dated as of March 1, 1981,
                                                 to Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Coyote Generating
                                                 Unit No. 1 and Amendment No. 2
                                                 dated March 1, 1981, to Coyote
                                                 Plant Coal Agreement.

10-H-3        10-K for year            10-H-3    -- Amendment dated as of
              ended 12/31/89                     July 29, 1983, to Agreement
                                                 for Sharing Ownership of
                                                 Coyote Generating Unit No. 1.

10-H-4        10-K for year            10-H-4    -- Agreement dated as of Sept.
              ended 12/31/92                     5, 1985, containing Amendment
                                                 No. 3 to Agreement for Sharing
                                                 Ownership of Coyote Generating
                                                 Unit No.1, dated as of July 1,
                                                 1977, and Amendment No. 5 to
                                                 Coyote Plant Coal Agreement,
                                                 dated as of January 1, 1978.

10-H-5        10-Q for quarter         10-A      -- Amendment dated as of
              ended 9/30/01                      June 14, 2001, to Agreement for
                                                 Sharing Ownership of
                                                 Coyote Generating Unit No. 1.

10-I          2-63744                  5-I       -- Coyote Plant Coal Agreement
                                                 by and between the Company,
                                                 Minnkota Power Cooperative,
                                                 Inc., Montana-Dakota
                                                 Utilities Co., Northwestern
                                                 Public Service Company,
                                                 Minnesota Power & Light
                                                 Company, and Knife River
                                                 Coal Mining Company (dated
                                                 as of January 1, 1978).

10-I-1        10-K for year            10-I-1    -- Addendum, dated as of March 10,
              ended 12/31/92                     1980, to Coyote Plant Coal Agreement.

10-I-2        10-K for year            10-I-2    -- Amendment (No. 3), dated as
              ended 12/31/92                     of May 28, 1980, to Coyote
                                                 Plant Coal Agreement.

10-I-3        10-K for year            10-I-3    -- Fourth Amendment, dated as
              ended 12/31/92                     of August 19, 1985, to
                                                 Coyote Plant Coal Agreement.

10-I-4        10-Q for quarter         19-A      -- Sixth Amendment, dated as of
              ended 6/30/93                      February 17, 1993, to Coyote
                                                 Plant Coal Agreement.

10-I-5        10-K for year            10-I-5    -- Agreement and Consent to
              ended 12/31/01                     Assignment of the Coyote Plant
                                                 Coal Agreement.

33

                  PREVIOUSLY FILED
              -------------------------------
                                        AS
                                      EXHIBIT
              FILE NO.                  NO.
              -------------          --------


10-K          10-K for year            10-K      -- Diversity Exchange Agreement
              ended 12/31/91                     by and between the Company
                                                 and Northern States Power
                                                 Company, (dated as of May 21, 1985)
                                                 and amendment thereto (dated as of
                                                 August 12, 1985).

10-K-1        10-Q for quarter         10        -- Power Sales Agreement
              ended 9/30/99                      between the Company and
                                                 Manitoba Hydro Electric
                                                 Board (dated as of July 1, 1999).

10-L          10-K for year            10-L      -- Integrated Transmission
              ended 12/31/91                     Agreement by and between the
                                                 Company, Missouri Basin
                                                 Municipal Power Agency and
                                                 Western Minnesota Municipal
                                                 Power Agency (dated as of
                                                 March 31, 1986).

10-L-1        10-K for year            10-L-1    -- Amendment No. 1, dated as
              ended 12/31/88                     of December 28, 1988, to
                                                 Integrated Transmission
                                                 Agreement (dated as of
                                                 March 31, 1986).

10-M          10-K for year            10-M      -- Hoot Lake Coal Transportation
              ended 12/31/99                     Agreement by and between the
                                                 Company and The Burlington
                                                 Northern and Santa Fe
                                                 Railway Company (dated as
                                                 of July 19, 1999).

10-N-1                                           -- Deferred Compensation Plan
                                                 for Directors, as amended.*

10-N-2        10-Q for quarter         10-C      -- Executive Survivor and
              ended 3/31/02                      Supplemental Retirement Plan,
                                                 as amended.*

10-N-3        10-K for year            10-N-5    -- Nonqualified Profit Sharing
              ended 12/31/93                     Plan.*

10-N-4        10-Q for quarter         10-B      -- Nonqualified Retirement
              ended 3/31/02                      Savings Plan, as amended.*

10-N-5        10-K for year            10-N-6    -- 1999 Employee Stock
              ended 12/31/98                     Purchase Plan.

10-N-6        10-K for year            10-N-7    -- 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.*
              ended 12/31/98

34

                  PREVIOUSLY FILED
              -------------------------------
                                        AS
                                      EXHIBIT
              FILE NO.                  NO.
              -------------          --------


10-O-1        10-Q for quarter         10-A      -- Executive Employment Agreement,
              ended 6/30/02                      John Erickson.*

10-O-2        10-Q for quarter         10-B      -- Executive Employment Agreement
              ended 6/30/02                      and amendment no. 1, Lauris Molbert.*

10-O-3        10-Q for quarter         10-C      -- Executive Employment Agreement,
              ended 6/30/02                      Kevin Moug.*

10-O-4        10-Q for quarter         10-D      -- Executive Employment Agreement,
              ended 6/30/02                      George Koeck.*

10-P-1        10-Q for quarter         10-E      -- Change in Control Severance
              ended 6/03/02                      Agreement, John Erickson.*

10-P-2        10-Q for quarter         10-F      -- Change in Control Severance
              ended 6/03/02                      Agreement, Lauris Molbert.*

10-P-3        10-Q for quarter         10-G      -- Change in Control Severance
              ended 6/03/02                      Agreement, Kevin Moug.*

10-P-4        10-Q for quarter         10-H      -- Change in Control Severance
              ended 6/03/02                      Agreement, George Koeck.*

13-A                                             -- Portions of 2002 Annual
                                                 Report to Shareholders
                                                 incorporated by reference
                                                 in this Form 10-K.

21-A                                             -- Subsidiaries of Registrant.

23                                               -- Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

24-A                                             -- Powers of Attorney.

99-A                                             -- Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                                                 Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                                                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
                                                 of 2002 as to the Annual Report on Form
                                                 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,
                                                 by John D. Erickson, President and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer, Otter Tail Corporation.

99-B                                             -- Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                                                 Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                                                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
                                                 of 2002 as to the Annual Report on Form
                                                 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,
                                                 by Kevin G. Moug, Chief Financial Officer
                                                 and Treasurer, Otter Tail Corporation.


* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.

35

EXHIBIT 4-D-4


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION


FIRST AMENDMENT
Dated as of December 1, 2002

to

NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Dated as of December 1, 2001


Re: $90,000,000 6.63% Senior Notes due December 1, 2011



FIRST AMENDMENT TO NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of December 1, 2002 (the or this "First Amendment") to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2001 is between and among OTTER TAIL CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), and each of the institutions which is a signatory to this First Amendment (collectively, the "Noteholders").

RECITALS:

A. The Company and each of the Noteholders have heretofore entered into the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2001 (the "Note Purchase Agreement"). The Company has heretofore issued the $90,000,000 6.63% Senior Notes due December 1, 2011 (the "Notes") dated December 27, 2001 pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement. The Noteholders are the holders of 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes.

B. The Company has also entered into that certain Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 2002 as amended by a First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of September 19, 2002 (as amended, the "Credit Agreement") with the Banks defined therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as a Bank and as Agent.

C. Section 10.7 of the Note Purchase Agreement provides, inter alia, that the Noteholders are entitled to the benefit of any covenant, agreement, event of default or put event set forth in the Credit Agreement which is more restrictive on the Company (or more favorable to the Banks) than the covenants, agreements, events of default or put events contained in the Note Purchase Agreement.

D. Pursuant to Section 10.7 of the Note Purchase Agreement and to incorporate those provisions of the Credit Agreement the benefit of which the Noteholders are entitled to, the Company and the Noteholders now desire to amend the Note Purchase Agreement in the respects, but only in the respects, hereinafter set forth.

E. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Note Purchase Agreement (as amended hereby) unless herein defined or the context shall otherwise require.

NOW, THEREFORE, upon the full and complete satisfaction of the conditions precedent to the effectiveness of this First Amendment set forth in
SECTION 3.1 hereof, and in consideration of good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Noteholders do hereby agree as follows:

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

Section 1.1. Section 7.1(a) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended by adding the following words after the phrase "this Section 7.1(a)": "provided, further, that in the event that the Company delivers such financial statements or copies of such Quarterly


Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

Report on Form 10-Q to any Lender prior to the end of the time period specified above, then and in such event, the Company shall deliver the same such items to each such holder of the Notes concurrently therewith;"

Section 1.2. Section 7.1(d) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"(d) Notice of Default or Event of Default -- immediately upon a Responsible Officer becoming aware of the existence of any Default or Event of Default, a written notice specifying the nature and period of existence thereof and what action the Company is taking or proposes to take with respect thereto;"

Section 1.3. Section 8.3(a) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"Section 8.3. Investment Grade Put Event. (a) In the event that an Investment Grade Put Event shall occur, the Company will give written notice (a "Company Notice") of such fact not more than 10 days after the Investment Grade Put Event Date to all holders of the Notes. The Company Notice shall (i) describe the facts and circumstances of the Investment Grade Put Event in reasonable detail, (ii) describe the Debt of the Company then outstanding, (iii) specify the rating, if any, accorded to Senior Debt by a Designated Rating Agency which is below an Acceptable Rating or state that Senior Debt is no longer rated by either one or both of the Designated Rating Agencies, (iv) refer to this Section 8.3 and the right of the holders of the Notes to require the Company to purchase their Notes on the terms and conditions provided for herein upon the occurrence of an Investment Grade Put Event, and (v) contain an offer by the Company to purchase all of the outstanding Notes in full together with unpaid accrued interest to the date of purchase and the Make-Whole Amount. Each holder of the Notes shall have the right to accept such offer and require purchase of the Notes held by such holder in full by written notice to the Company given within 60 days following receipt of the Company Notice. On the date designated in such holder's notice (which shall be not less than 10 days nor more than 20 days after the date such notice is delivered to the Company), the Company shall purchase all Notes held by such holder at 100% of the principal amount of such Notes, together with unpaid accrued interest thereon to the date of purchase, and the Make-Whole Amount, if any. Failure to respond by a holder of the Notes shall constitute an acceptance of such offer and the date of purchase shall be the 10th Business Day following the end of the 60 day period referred to in the preceding sentence."

Section 1.4. The defined terms "Investment Grade Put Event" and "Senior Debt" set forth in Section 8.3 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:

"Investment Grade Put Event" shall mean, and occur on, the first date on which (i) either of the Designated Rating Agencies rate Senior Debt below an Acceptable Rating or (ii) Senior Debt is no longer rated by either one or both of the Designated Rating

-2-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

Agencies. If an Investment Grade Put Event Date shall have occurred and subsequent to such Investment Grade Put Event Date both Designated Rating Agencies shall rate Senior Debt an Acceptable Rating and thereafter an Investment Grade Put Event shall occur, then a new Investment Grade Put Event Date shall occur under this Agreement and the Company's obligations under this Section 8.3 shall remain binding and operative.

"Senior Debt" shall mean the long term, unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company.

Section 1.5. The introductory language to Section 9 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"The Company covenants that so long as any of the Notes are outstanding, unless, with respect to Sections 9.1 through 9.5 and Sections 9.7 through 9.12, the Required Holders shall otherwise expressly agree in writing, or, with respect to Section 9.6, the holder of each Note shall otherwise expressly agree in writing:"

Section 1.6. Section 9.7 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby deleted in its entirety.

Section 1.7. The introductory language to Section 10 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"The Company covenants that so long as any of the Notes are outstanding, unless the Required Holders shall otherwise expressly agree in writing:"

Section 1.8. Section 10.3(j) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"(j) Liens created, assumed or incurred after the date of the Closing given to secure Debt of the Company or any Subsidiary in addition to the Liens permitted by the preceding clauses (a) through
(i) hereof; provided that all Debt secured by Liens permitted under this Section 10.3(j) does not exceed $2,000,000 in the aggregate at any time outstanding;"

Section 1.9. Section 10.4 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in by restating the introductory language and clause (a) thereof to read as follows:

"Section 10.4. Merger, Consolidation, Etc. The Company will not, and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to, consolidate with or merge with any other corporation or convey, transfer or lease substantially all of its assets in a single transaction or series of transactions to any Person; provided that:

(a) Any Material Subsidiary which is a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary may directly or indirectly merge or consolidate with or into, or transfer all or

-3-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

substantially all of its property to, or be a party to an analogous reorganization with the Company or any other Wholly-Owned Subsidiary so long as (i) in any such transaction involving the Company, the Company shall be the surviving or continuing Person and (ii) in any such transaction involving such other Wholly-Owned Subsidiary which is the surviving or continuing Person, such Wholly-Owned Subsidiary, if the non-surviving Material Subsidiary was obligated under the Guaranty Agreement and the Guaranty Agreement shall not have been released pursuant to Section 9.12, shall provide to the holders of the Notes the items described in Section 9.8 (a) through (d) concurrently with the consummation of such transaction; provided further, that a Material Subsidiary may transfer all or substantially all of its property without complying with the foregoing provisions of this clause (a) if the transfer is in compliance with Section 10.5; and"

Section 1.10. Section 10.6 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"Section 10.6. Transactions with Related Parties. The Company will not and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to enter into directly or indirectly any transaction or group of related transactions (including without limitation the purchase, lease, sale or exchange of properties or the rendering of any service) with any Related Party (other than the Company or another Material Subsidiary), except in the ordinary course of and pursuant to the reasonable requirements of the Company's or such Material Subsidiary's business and upon fair and reasonable terms no less favorable to the Company or such Material Subsidiary than would be obtainable in a comparable arm's-length transaction with a Person not a Related Party."

Section 1.11. The following shall be added as new Sections 10.8 through 10.12 of the Note Purchase Agreement:

"Section 10.8. Other Agreements. The Company will not and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to enter into any agreement, bond, note or other instrument with or for the benefit of any Person other than the holders of the Notes which would: (a) be violated or breached by the Company's performance of its obligations under the Notes or this Agreement, or (b) prohibit any Subsidiary of the Company from paying dividends or distributions on, or redeeming, acquiring or retiring for value, any shares of stock or other ownership interest that the Company holds in such Subsidiary.

Section 10.9. Restricted Payments. The Company will not and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to either: (a) make any Restricted Payment if any Default or Event of Default shall exist or shall result from the making of such Restricted Payment; or (b) directly or indirectly make any payment on, or redeem, repurchase, defease, or make any sinking fund payment on account of, or any other provision for, or otherwise pay, acquire or retire for value, any Indebtedness of the Company or any Subsidiary that is subordinated in right of payment to the Notes (whether pursuant to its terms or by

-4-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

operation of law), except for regularly-scheduled payments of interest and principal (which shall not include payments contingently required upon occurrence of a change of control or other event) that are not otherwise prohibited hereunder or under the document or agreement stating the terms of such subordination.

Section 10.10. Investments. The Company will not and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to acquire for value, make, have or hold any Investments, except:

(a) Investments outstanding on April 30, 2002 and listed on Schedule 10.10 attached hereto, and any increases or decreases in the value thereof or write-ups, write-downs or write-offs with respect to such Investments;

(b) travel advances to officers and employees in the ordinary course of business;

(c) Investments in readily marketable direct obligations of the United States of America having maturities of one year or less from the date of acquisition;

(d) Certificates of deposit or bankers' acceptances, each maturing within one year from the date of acquisition, issued by any commercial bank organized under the laws of the United States or any State thereof which has (i) combined capital, surplus and undivided profits of at least $100,000,000, and (ii) a credit rating with respect to its unsecured indebtedness from a nationally recognized rating service that is satisfactory to the Required Holders;

(e) Commercial paper maturing within 270 days from the date of issuance and given the highest rating by a nationally recognized rating service;

(f) Repurchase agreements relating to securities issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States of America;

(g) Extensions of credit in the nature of accounts receivable or notes receivable arising from the sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of business;

(h) Share of stock, obligations or other securities received in settlement of claims arising in the ordinary course of business;

(i) Investments outstanding on April 30, 2002 in Subsidiaries by the Company and other Subsidiaries, and Investments by the Company or other Subsidiaries in Persons that will be Subsidiaries upon completion of such Investments;

-5-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

(j) Investments not otherwise permitted hereunder which shall not exceed (based on total consideration paid by the Company or a Material Subsidiary): (i) $10,000,000 for any single Investment or series of related Investments in any Person not engaged in one or more of the Company's and Subsidiaries' present lines of business, or (ii) $20,000,000 for any single Investment or series of related Investments in any Person that is engaged in one or more of the Company's and Subsidiaries' present lines of business, provided that consent of the Required Holders to such Investments in excess of such limit shall not be unreasonably withheld; and

(k) Any Material Subsidiary may make Investments constituting loans to the Company and provided that no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and continued, the Company and any Material Subsidiary may make Investments constituting loans to (i) any Material Subsidiaries, or (ii) any Subsidiaries that are not Material Subsidiaries, provided, that such loans to any one Subsidiary shall not exceed $15,000,000 in aggregate principal amounts outstanding at any time.

Section 10.11. Contingent Liabilities. The Company will not and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to either: (a) endorse, guarantee, contingently agree to purchase or to provide funds for the payment of, or otherwise become contingently liable upon, any obligation of any other Person, except by the endorsement of negotiable instruments for deposit or collection (or similar transactions) in the ordinary course of business, or (b) agree to maintain the net worth or working capital of, or provide funds to satisfy any other financial test applicable to, any other Person, except (in the case of (a) or (b) above) for (i) guaranties by the Company of loans to leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plans; (ii) a performance guaranty by the Company of performance by DMI Industries under a certain contract involving aggregate payments of approximately $20,000,000; (iii) guaranties by the Company or any Material Subsidiary of obligations of any Material Subsidiary as lessee under any lease that is not a Capital Lease, (iv) other guaranties limited as to principal of recovery to not more than $10,000,000 in the aggregate; (v) guaranties by Varistar Corporation of the obligations of the Company under the Bank Credit Agreement and (vi) the guaranty by Varistar Corporation of the obligations of the Company in respect of up to $40,000,000 of Insured Senior Notes due October 1, 2017, as described in a Prospectus dated September 11, 2002 and a prospectus supplement dated on or about September 19, 2002.

Section 10.12. Unconditional Purchase Obligations. The Company will not and will not permit any Material Subsidiary to enter into or be a party to any contract for the purchase or lease of materials, supplies or other property or services if such contract requires that payment be made by it regardless of whether or not delivery is ever made of such materials, supplies or other property or services."

Section 1.12. Section 11(f) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended as follows:

-6-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

(a) the term "Significant" shall be deleted wherever said term appears and the term "Material" shall be substituted therefor; and

(b) the figure "$10,000,000" shall be deleted wherever said figure appears and the figure "$5,000,000" shall be substituted therefor.

Section 1.13. Sections 11(g) and (h) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and are hereby amended by deleting the term "Significant" wherever said term appears and substituting therefor the term "Material."

Section 1.14. Section 11(i) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended as follows:

(a) the term "Significant" shall be deleted and the term "Material" shall be substituted therefor;

(b) the figure "$10,000,000" shall be deleted wherever said figure appears and the figure "$1,000,000" shall be substituted therefor; and

(c) the phrase "60 days" shall be deleted wherever said phrase appears and the phrase "30 days" shall be substituted therefor.

Section 1.15. Section 11(k) of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"(k) if (i) any Plan shall fail to satisfy the minimum funding standards of ERISA or the Code for any plan year or part thereof or a waiver of such standards or extension of any amortization period is sought or granted under section 412 of the Code, (ii) a notice of intent to terminate any Plan shall have been or is reasonably expected to be filed with the PBGC or the PBGC shall have instituted proceedings under ERISA section 4042 to terminate or appoint a trustee to administer any Plan or the PBGC shall have notified the Company or any ERISA Affiliate that a Plan may become a subject of any such proceedings, (iii) the aggregate "amount of unfunded benefit liabilities" (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(18) of ERISA) under all Plans, determined in accordance with Title IV of ERISA, shall exceed $500,000, (iv) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate shall have incurred or is reasonably expected to incur any liability pursuant to Title I or IV of ERISA or the penalty or excise tax provisions of the Code relating to employee benefit plans, (v) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate withdraws from any Multiemployer Plan, or (vi) the Company or any Subsidiary establishes or amends any employee welfare benefit plan that provides post-employment welfare benefits in a manner that would increase the liability of the Company or any Subsidiary thereunder; and in the case of clauses (i), (iv), (v) or (vi) above only, any such event or events, either individually or together with any other such event or events, would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; or"

-7-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

Section 1.16. The following shall be added as a new Section 11(l) of the Note Purchase Agreement:

"(l) any Person, or group of Persons acting in concert, that owned less than 5% of the shares of any voting class of stock of the Company shall have acquired more than 25% of the shares of such voting stock."

Section 1.17. The following defined terms contained in Schedule B of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be and are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:

"Bank Credit Agreement" means the Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 2002 among the Company, the Banks defined therein, and U.S. Bank National Association, as a Bank and as Agent, as amended from time to time, any replacement, additional or successor agreement or agreements thereto or any other bank credit facility or bank credit facilities in effect from time to time with banks or other lending institutions.

"Debt" means, with respect to any Person, without duplication,

(a) its liabilities for borrowed money and its redemption obligations in respect of Redeemable Preferred Stock;

(b) its liabilities for the deferred purchase price of property acquired by such Person (excluding accounts payable arising in the ordinary course of business but including, without limitation, all liabilities created or arising under any conditional sale or other title retention agreement with respect to any such property);

(c) its Capital Lease Obligations;

(d) all liabilities for borrowed money secured by any Lien with respect to any property owned by such Person (whether or not it has assumed or otherwise become liable for such liabilities);

(e) net liabilities under any interest rate swap, collar or other interest rate hedging agreement;

(f) undertakings or agreements to reimburse or indemnify issuers of letters of credit other than commercial letters of credit; and

(g) any Guaranty of such Person with respect to Debt of a type described in any of clauses (a) through (f) hereof, excluding ordinary course endorsements.

-8-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

Debt of any Person shall include all obligations of such Person of the character described in clauses (a) through (g) to the extent such Person remains legally liable in respect thereof notwithstanding that any such obligation is deemed to be extinguished under GAAP.

"Indebtedness" with respect to any Person means, at any time, without duplication, all obligations, contingent or otherwise, which in accordance with GAAP should be classified upon the Company's balance sheet as liabilities, but in any event including the following (whether or not they should be classified as liabilities upon such balance sheet):

(a) its liabilities for borrowed money and its redemption obligations in respect of Redeemable Preferred Stock;

(b) its liabilities for the deferred purchase price of property acquired by such Person (excluding accounts payable arising in the ordinary course of business but including all liabilities created or arising under any conditional sale or other title retention agreement with respect to any such property);

(c) Capital Lease Obligations;

(d) all liabilities for borrowed money secured by any Lien with respect to any property owned by such Person (whether or not it has assumed or otherwise become liable for such liabilities);

(e) all its liabilities in respect of letters of credit or instruments serving a similar function issued or accepted for its account by banks and other financial institutions (whether or not representing obligations for borrowed money);

(f) Swaps of such Person;

(g) any obligation on account of deposits or advances; and

(h) any Guaranty of such Person with respect to liabilities of a type described in any of clauses (a) through
(f) hereof.

For all purposes of this Agreement, the Indebtedness of any Person shall include the Indebtedness of any partnership or joint venture in which such Person is a general partner or a joint venturer.

"Interest Charges" means, for any period of determination, the aggregate consolidated amount, without duplication, of interest paid, accrued or scheduled to be paid in respect of any Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries, including in all cases interest expense determined in accordance with GAAP and (a) all but the principal component of payments in respect of conditional sale contracts, Capital Leases and other

-9-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

title retention agreements, (b) commissions, discounts and other fees and charges with respect to letters of credit and bankers' acceptance financings and (c) net costs under any interest rate swap, collar or other interest rate hedging agreements, in each case determined in accordance with GAAP.

"Lender" means any "Bank" under the Bank Credit Agreement.

Section 1.18. The following defined terms shall be and are hereby added in alphabetical order to Schedule B of the Note Purchase Agreement:

"DMI Industries" means DMI Industries, Inc., a North Dakota corporation and a subsidiary of the Company.

"First Amendment Effective Date" means December ___, 2002.

"Investment" means the acquisition, purchase, making or holding of any stock or other security, any loan, advance, contribution to capital, extension of credit (except for trade and customer accounts receivable for inventory sold or services rendered in the ordinary course of business and payable in accordance with customary trade terms), any acquisitions of real or personal property (other than real and personal property acquired in the ordinary course of business) and any purchase or commitment or option to purchase stock or other debt or equity securities of or any interest in another Person or any integral part of any business or the assets comprising such business or part thereof.

"Material Subsidiary" means (a) the Subsidiaries listed on SCHEDULE 1 hereto, and (b) any Subsidiary acquired after the First Amendment Effective Date if the acquisition of such Subsidiary has required consent of the Required Holders under Section 10.10(j) to be deemed permitted under this Agreement.

"Related Party" means any Person (other than a Subsidiary):
(a) which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company; (b) which beneficially owns or holds 5% or more of the equity interest of the Company; or (c) 5% or more of the equity interest of which is beneficially owned or held by the Company or a Subsidiary. As used in this definition, "control" means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

"Restricted Payment" means any expenditure by the Company or any Subsidiary for purchase, redemption or other acquisition for value of any shares of the Company's or any Subsidiary's stock, payment of any dividend thereon (other than stock dividends and dividends payable solely to the Company), any distribution on, or payment on account of the purchase, redemption, defeasance or other acquisition or retirement for value of, any shares of the Company's or any Subsidiary's stock, or the setting aside of any funds for any

-10-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

such purpose (other than payment to, or on account of or for the benefit of, the Company only).

"Varistar Corporation" shall mean Varistar Corporation, a Minnesota corporation and a subsidiary of the Company.

Section 1.19. Schedule 1 and Schedule 10.10 attached hereto shall be and are hereby inserted as Schedule 1 and Schedule 10.10, respectively, to the Note Purchase Agreement.

Section 1.20. The Noteholders agree that the Company has satisfied the requirements of Section 10.7 of the Note Purchase Agreement by its execution and delivery of this First Amendment as it pertains to the Credit Agreement; provided, however, that the requirements of said Section 10.7 are and shall be applicable to any future amendment, restatement or replacement of the Credit Agreement, in accordance with the terms of said Section 10.7.

SECTION 2. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY.

Section 2.1. To induce the Noteholders to execute and deliver this First Amendment (which representations shall survive the execution and delivery of this First Amendment), the Company represents and warrants to the Noteholders that:

(a) this First Amendment has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by it and this First Amendment constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation, contract and agreement of the Company enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws or equitable principles relating to or limiting creditors' rights generally;

(b) the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations, contracts and agreements of the Company enforceable against it in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws or equitable principles relating to or limiting creditors' rights generally;

(c) the execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this First Amendment (i) has been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, if required, shareholder action, (ii) does not require the consent or approval of any governmental or regulatory body or agency, and (iii) will not (A) violate (1) any provision of law, statute, rule or regulation or its certificate of incorporation or bylaws, (2) any order of any court or any rule, regulation or order of any other agency or government binding upon it, or (3) any provision of any material indenture, agreement or other instrument to which it is a party or by which its properties or assets are or may be bound, or (B) result in a breach or constitute (alone or with due notice or lapse of time or both) a default under any indenture, agreement or other instrument referred to in clause (iii)(A)(3) of this SECTION 2.1(c);

-11-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

(d) as of the date hereof and after giving effect to this First Amendment, no Default or Event of Default has occurred which is continuing;

(e) all the representations and warranties contained in
Section 5 of the Note Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all material respects with the same force and effect as if made by the Company on and as of the date hereof; and

(f) since April 30, 2002, the Company has not acquired any Subsidiary which is a "Material Subsidiary" under the Bank Credit Agreement.

SECTION 3. CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS FIRST AMENDMENT.

Section 3.1. This First Amendment shall not become effective until, and shall become effective when, each and every one of the following conditions shall have been satisfied:

(a) executed counterparts of this First Amendment, duly executed by the Company and the holders of at least 100% of the outstanding principal of the Notes, shall have been delivered to the Noteholders;

(b) the Noteholders shall have received a copy of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company authorizing the execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this First Amendment, certified by its Secretary or an Assistant Secretary;

(c) the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in SECTION 2 hereof are true and correct on and with respect to the date hereof;

(d) the Noteholders shall have received the favorable opinion of counsel to the Company as to the matters set forth in SECTIONS 2.1(a), 2.1(b) and 2.1(c) hereof, which opinion shall be in form and substance satisfactory to the Noteholders;

(e) Varistar Corporation shall have affirmed its obligations under the Guaranty Agreement pursuant to an Affirmation in the form of EXHIBIT A hereto; and

(f) the Company shall have paid the reasonable fees and expenses of Chapman and Cutler, counsel to the Noteholders, pursuant to
SECTION 4.1.

Upon receipt of all of the foregoing, this First Amendment shall become effective.

SECTION 4. PAYMENT OF NOTEHOLDERS' COUNSEL FEES AND EXPENSES.

Section 4.1. The Company agrees to pay upon demand, the reasonable fees and expenses of Chapman and Cutler, counsel to the Noteholders, in connection with the negotiation, preparation, approval, execution and delivery of this First Amendment.

-12-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

SECTION 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REGARDING GUARANTY.

The Company hereby acknowledges and agrees that the guaranty by Varistar Corporation of the obligations of the Company in respect of the Company's $40,000,000 Insured Senior Notes due October 1, 2017 constitutes "Priority Debt" under the Note Purchase Agreement.

SECTION 6. MISCELLANEOUS.

Section 6.1. This First Amendment shall be construed in connection with and as part of the Note Purchase Agreement, and except as modified and expressly amended by this First Amendment, all terms, conditions and covenants contained in the Note Purchase Agreement and the Notes are hereby ratified and shall be and remain in full force and effect.

Section 6.2. Any and all notices, requests, certificates and other instruments executed and delivered after the execution and delivery of this First Amendment may refer to the Note Purchase Agreement without making specific reference to this First Amendment but nevertheless all such references shall include this First Amendment unless the context otherwise requires.

Section 6.3. The descriptive headings of the various Sections or parts of this First Amendment are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof.

Section 6.4. This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with New York law.

-13-

Otter Tail Corporation First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement

Section 6.5. The execution hereof by you shall constitute a contract between us for the uses and purposes hereinabove set forth, and this First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each executed counterpart constituting an original, but all together only one agreement.

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

By /s/ George A. Koeck
   Title: Corporate Secretary and General
          Counsel

-14-

Otter Tail Corporation                First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement


Accepted and Agreed to:


                                      THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF
                                        AMERICA

                                      By  /s/ Jay D. Squiers
                                          Title: Vice President


                                      HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                      By: Prudential Private Placement
                                          Investors, L.P., as Investment Advisor

                                      By: Prudential Private Placement
                                          Investors, Inc., General Partner

                                      By  /s/ Jay D. Squiers
                                          Title: Vice President


                                      MEDICA HEALTH PLAN

                                      By: Prudential Private Placement
                                          Investors, L.P., as Investment Advisor

                                      By: Prudential Private Placement
                                          Investors, Inc., General Partner

                                      By  /s/ Jay D. Squiers
                                          Title: Vice President


                                      GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL ASSURANCE COMPANY

                                      By: GE Asset Management, its Investment
                                          Advisor

                                      By: /s/ Stephen De Motto
                                          Title: Vice President - Private
                                                 Investments

-15-

Otter Tail Corporation                First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement


                                      GE EDISON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                      By: GE Asset Management, its Investment
                                          Advisor

                                      By  /s/ Stephen De Motto
                                          Title: Vice President - Private
                                                 Investments


                                      GE CAPITAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF
                                        NEW YORK

                                      By: GE Asset Management, its Investment
                                          Advisor

                                      By  /s/ Stephen De Motto
                                          Title: Vice President - Private
                                                 Investments


                                      FIRST COLONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                      By: GE Asset Management, its Investment
                                          Advisor

                                      By  /s/ Stephen De Motto
                                          Title: Vice President - Private
                                                 Investments


                                      TREASURER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
                                        SOUTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEM

                                      By  /s/ Grady L. Patterson, Jr.
                                          Title: S C State Treasurer


                                      COUNTRY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                      By  /s/ John Jacobs
                                      Title: Senior Investment Officer

-16-

EXHIBIT A

AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY AGREEMENT

THIS AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY AGREEMENT (the or this "Affirmation") is made as of the 1st day of December, 2002, by VARISTAR CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation (the "Subsidiary Guarantor") in favor of the Purchasers named in Schedule I to the hereinafter defined Note Purchase Agreement (together with their successors, assigns and transferees, the "Noteholders"). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the hereinafter defined Note Purchase Agreement.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Subsidiary Guarantor is presently a subsidiary of Otter Tail Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company");

WHEREAS, the Company and the Noteholders have entered into the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2001 (as amended, modified, restated or otherwise supplemented from time to time, the "Note Purchase Agreement"); pursuant to which the Company has issued and sold to the Noteholders its $90,000,000 6.63% Senior Notes, due December 1, 2011 (the "Notes");

WHEREAS, in connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, the Subsidiary Guarantor previously executed and delivered to the Noteholders the Guaranty Agreement dated as of December 1, 2001 (the "Guaranty Agreement"), pursuant to which the Subsidiary Guarantor has absolutely and unconditionally guaranteed the payment of the Notes and the performance by the Company of its obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement;

WHEREAS, the Company and the Noteholders have entered into a First Amendment dated as of December 1, 2002 (the "First Amendment") to the Note Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which certain provisions of the Note Purchase Agreement have been amended;

WHEREAS, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor have derived both direct and indirect benefits from the issuance and sale of the Notes and will derive both direct and indirect benefits from the execution and delivery by the Noteholders of the First Amendment;

WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to the execution and delivery by the Noteholders of the First Amendment that the Subsidiary Guarantor execute this Affirmation to acknowledge the First Amendment and to reaffirm its obligations under the Guaranty Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agrees as follows:


1. First Amendment. The Subsidiary Guarantor acknowledges the First Amendment, and agrees that the Notes and the obligations of the Company under the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, are guaranteed by the Guaranty Agreement. All references in the Guaranty Agreement to the "Note Purchase Agreement" shall be deemed to refer to the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment.

2. Affirmation. In connection with the execution and delivery of the First Amendment, the Subsidiary Guarantor ratifies and affirms all of its payment and performance obligations under the Guaranty Agreement, in each case as if each reference in such Guaranty Agreement to the obligations secured thereby is construed to hereafter mean and refer to such obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment. The Subsidiary Guarantor hereby consents to the terms and conditions of the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, and acknowledges receipt of a copy of the First Amendment and acknowledges that the Guaranty Agreement remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. The execution of this Affirmation shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of the Noteholders, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Guaranty Agreement nor constitute a novation of any of the obligations under the Notes or the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment.

3. Successors and Assigns. This Affirmation shall be binding upon the Subsidiary Guarantor and upon its respective successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the Noteholders and its respective successors and assigns. The successors and assigns of such entities shall include, without limitation, their respective receivers, trustees, or debtors-in-possession.

4. Further Assurances. The Subsidiary Guarantor hereby agrees from time to time, as and when requested by any Noteholder, to execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered, all such documents, instruments and agreements and to take or cause to be taken such further or other action as such Noteholder may reasonably deem necessary or desirable in order to carry out the intent and purposes of this Affirmation, the Notes, the Guaranty Agreement the Note Purchase Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment.

5. Definitions. All references to the singular shall be deemed to include the plural and vice versa where the context so requires.

6. GOVERNING LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES.

7. Severability. Wherever possible, each provision of this Affirmation shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Affirmation shall be prohibited by or invalid under such law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity without

-2-

invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Affirmation.

8. Merger. This Affirmation represents the final agreement of the Subsidiary Guarantor with respect to the matters contained herein and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements, or prior or subsequent oral agreements, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor or the Noteholders.

9. Execution in Counterparts. This Affirmation may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

10. Section Headings. The section headings herein are for convenience of reference only, and shall not affect in any way the interpretation of any of the provisions hereof.

[remainder of page intentionally left blank]

-3-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Affirmation has been duly executed by the undersigned as of the day and year first set forth above.

VARISTAR CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation

By

-4-

SCHEDULE 1

MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES

1.       Varistar Corporation                   corp.

2.       BTD Manufacturing, Inc.                corp.

3.       DMI Industries, Inc.                   corp.

4.       DMS Health Technologies                _____

5.       DMS Imaging, Inc.                      corp.

6.       E.W. Wylie Corporation                 corp.

7.       Northern Pipe Products, Inc.           corp.

8.       Vinyltech Corporation                  corp.


SCHEDULE 10.10

INVESTMENTS

Investment in Affordable Housing (OTC)                               $ 6,108,075

Investment in Loan Pools (OTP)                                         1,186,493

Notes Receivable (Glendale Machine)                                      125,000

Deferred Compensation Plan (Varistar)                                  3,280,391

Investment in FM Redhawks                                              2,007,340

Life Insurance (DMS)                                                   1,034,475

Notes Receivable (Wahpeton Land-OTR)                                     140,972

Investment - Moorhead State Lighting (OTESCO)                          1,542,945

Telecommunication Investments (MIS)

  CoBank (St. Paul Bank for Coop's)                                    1,040,098

  ONVOY                                                                  708,300

  Central MN Network Systems                                             353,500

  West Central Transport Group, LLC                                      108,671

  Central Transport Group, LLC                                            52,000

  Northwest Minnesota Special Access, LLC                                  9,161

  Independent Information Systems, Inc.                                   80,000

  Northern Transport Group, LLC                                           29,500

  Northern Fiber, Inc.                                                     2,687

  Notes Receivable                                                       170,908

Other Miscellaneous (OTP, BTD, Chassis, MDG)                              28,453
                                                                     -----------
                                                                     $18,008,969
                                                                     ===========


Exhibit 10-N-1

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2003


TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                           Page
                                                                          Number
                                                                          ------
1.   PURPOSE                                                                  3

2.   PLAN PERIODS                                                             3

3.   ADMINISTRATION                                                           3

4.   PARTICIPATION                                                            3

5.   DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNTS                                           5

6.   PAYMENT                                                                  8

7.   ASSIGNMENT                                                              12

8.   TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT                                               12

     SCHEDULE A

     SCHEDULE B

2

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2003

1. PURPOSE. The Plan is designed to provide a method of deferring payment to non-employee Directors of all or part of their retainer and/or meeting fees, as fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors, until termination of their services on the Board.

2. PLAN PERIODS. The first Plan Period shall commence upon the election of Directors at the 1984 Annual Stockholders' Meeting and terminate on December 31, 1984. An additional Plan Period will commence on July 1, 2000 and continue through December 31, 2000 for which a Director may elect to defer all or part of his or her retainer and/or meeting fees for that period in the form of restricted stock units, as provided in Section 5 hereof. Subsequent Plan Periods shall relate to successive calendar years.

3. ADMINISTRATION. The Plan shall be administered by a committee of the Board of Directors designated by the Board to administer the Plan (the "Committee"). The Committee shall be composed solely of two or more "Non-Employee Directors," within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Committee shall have the power to interpret the Plan and, subject to its provisions, to make all determinations necessary or desirable for the Plan's administration.

4. PARTICIPATION.

(a) An individual who serves as Director and is not otherwise employed by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries shall be eligible to participate in the Plan if the Director elects to have payment of his or her retainer and/or meeting fees in respect of a Plan Period deferred as provided herein.

3

(b) The election to participate shall be made by written notice on Schedule A to the Plan filed with the Committee prior to the first day of such Plan Period or, in the case of a Director who first becomes eligible during a Plan Period, not later than 30 days after the Director first becomes eligible.

(c) At the time a Director elects to participate in the Plan or when the Director makes an election with respect to a subsequent Plan Period, the Director may make a concurrent election on Schedule A to have an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (a "Tax Exempt Organization"), receive all or part of the cash distributions of the Director's retainer and/or meeting fees, plus accruals thereon, in accordance with the terms of distribution specified on Schedule A (a "Charitable Election"). At the time a Director makes a Charitable Election, the Director shall also recommend on Schedule A a specific Tax Exempt Organization to receive the distributions, subject to the approval of the Committee. The Committee shall make the final determination as to the Tax Exempt Organization that will receive the distributions and the Committee retains the authority to designate a different Tax Exempt Organization from the one recommended by the Director.

(d) In the case of a Director who first becomes eligible to participate during a Plan Period, the election to participate shall apply only to compensation subsequent to making the election. Each such election shall be irrevocable. An election on Schedule A shall remain in effect until changed or rescinded. Prior to the beginning of any subsequent Plan Period, a Participant may irrevocably elect in writing, by completing a new Schedule A, to change an earlier election with respect to such subsequent Plan Period. Such new election shall become effective on the first business day of the Plan Period following receipt by the Committee of the new Schedule A. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant may elect, prior to July 1, 2000,

4

to convert all or part of his or her Deferred Cash Account into the Deferred Stock Account, as such Accounts are described in Section 5 below. The number of whole and fractional restricted stock units (computed to four decimal places) shall be determined as of July 3, 2000 by dividing the amount of the Deferred Cash Account to be converted by the average of the high and low sale prices of a Common Share of Otter Tail Corporation as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System on July 3, 2000.

5. DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNTS.

(a) An account shall be established for each eligible, electing Director (a "Participant") which shall be designated as the Participant's Deferred Compensation Account. A Participant's Deferred Compensation Account shall include a Deferred Cash Account, a Charitable Contribution Account, and a Deferred Stock Account, as applicable. The Deferred Cash Account means the bookkeeping account of this Plan to which a Participant's deemed cash allocations are credited pursuant to the Plan. A Charitable Contribution Account means the bookkeeping account of this Plan to which a Participant's deemed cash allocations are credited pursuant to a Participant's Charitable Election under this Plan. The Deferred Stock Account means the bookkeeping account of this Plan to which a Participant's deemed restricted stock unit allocations are credited pursuant to this Plan. If a Participant elects to have payment deferred of his or her retainer and/or meeting fees, the amount of the retainer and/or meeting fees payable with respect to a Plan Period shall be credited, (i) in monthly installments as of the last day of each month in the Plan Period to which such retainer and/or meeting fees relate, for amounts credited to the Participant's Deferred Cash Account or Charitable Contribution Account and (ii) in quarterly installments as of the last day of each calendar quarter in the Plan Period to which such retainer and/or meeting fees relate, for amounts credited to the Participant's Deferred

5

Stock Account, subject to the provisions of Section 5(d). The Corporation shall not be required to segregate any amounts credited to the Deferred Compensation Accounts, which shall be established merely as an accounting convenience. Amounts credited to the Deferred Compensation Accounts shall at all times remain solely the property of the Corporation subject to the claims of its general creditors and available for the Corporation's use for whatever purpose desired.

(b) The amounts credited to a Deferred Cash Account and a Charitable Contribution Account shall, in order to alleviate the adverse effects of an inflationary economy, accrue interest each month at an annual rate equal to the rate charged for prime commercial loans of 90-day maturity (based on actual numbers of days, 360 days to the year), plus 1% as of the last business day of the month. Such interest shall be computed on the average daily balance in each of the Deferred Cash Account and the Charitable Contribution Account during such month and shall be credited to each such Account and compounded as of the last day of such month. Interest shall continue to accrue and be compounded on the unpaid balance in each of the Deferred Cash Account and the Charitable Contribution Account until such Account is fully distributed.

(c) The amounts credited to a Deferred Stock Account shall be credited in the form of restricted stock units as of the last day of the calendar quarter. The number of whole and fractional restricted stock units (computed to four decimal places) credited to the Account shall be determined by dividing the amount deferred to the Deferred Stock Account during the quarter by the average of the high and low sale prices of a Common Share of Otter Tail Corporation as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System on the last business day of the quarter. At such times as cash dividends are declared by the Corporation on its outstanding Common Shares, an amount shall be credited to the Participant's Deferred Stock Account on the record date for

6

such dividend equal to the amount of dividends that would be paid if the restricted stock units (including a fractional unit) were outstanding Common Shares on such date ("Dividend Equivalents"). At the end of the calendar quarter in which such Dividend Equivalents are credited to the Participant's Deferred Stock Account, the Dividend Equivalents shall be converted to additional whole and fractional restricted stock units (computed to four decimal places) in an amount determined by dividing the amount of the Dividend Equivalents by the average of the high and low sale prices of a Common Share of the Corporation as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System on the last business day of the quarter. In the event of a stock dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Common Shares or other securities of the Corporation, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Common Shares or other securities of the Corporation or other similar corporate transaction or event that affects the Common Shares, the Committee shall make such adjustments as it deems appropriate in the number of restricted stock units credited to a Participant's Deferred Stock Account in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the Participant's benefits under the Plan.

(d) If, prior to the end of a Plan Period, a Participant becomes an employee of the Corporation or one of its subsidiaries or dies or ceases for any reason to be a Director, or if the effective date of participation by a Participant for any Plan Period shall be other than the first day thereof, the Participant will be entitled to be credited with that proportion of the annual retainer for the full Plan Period which the number of days of his or her participation in the Plan during such Plan Period bears to the total number of days in such Plan Period.

7

6. PAYMENT.

(a) Following termination of a Participant's service on the Board, the Corporation shall distribute the entire amount accumulated in the Participant's Deferred Compensation Account in accordance with the provisions of this Plan.

(b) By written notice on Schedule A to the Plan filed with the Committee, a Participant may elect to have distribution of his or her Deferred Cash Account commence either (i) within 30 days after the date the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation, (ii) 12 months after the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation, or (iii) 24 months after the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation. Any such election, or any change in such election (by such subsequent written notice to the Committee), shall apply only to future deferrals. In the event no election is made as to the commencement of a distribution, such distribution shall commence within 30 days after the date the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation. The actual date that distribution shall commence shall be a date within the appropriate period determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(c) By written notice on Schedule A to the Plan filed with the Committee, a Participant may choose to receive the distribution of his or her Deferred Cash Account in the form of (i) one lump-sum payment or (ii) monthly distributions over a period selected by the Participant of up to 10 years. In the event a lump-sum payment is made under the Plan, the amount then standing to the Participant's credit in his or her Deferred Cash Account, including interest at the rate provided in Section 5(b) to the date of distribution, shall be paid to the Participant on the date determined under Section 6(b). In the case of a distribution over a period of years, the Corporation shall pay to the Participant, commencing on the date determined under Section 6(b), monthly installments from the amount then standing to the Participant's credit in his or her

8

Deferred Cash Account, including interest on the unpaid balance at the rate provided in Section 5(b) to the date of distribution. The amount of each installment shall be determined by dividing the then unpaid balance, plus accrued interest, in the Participant's Deferred Cash Account by the number of installments remaining to be paid. If a Participant does not make a choice as to the manner of distribution of his or her Deferred Cash Account, such distribution shall be made in the form of monthly installments paid over a five-year period. Notwithstanding the above and subject to approval by the Committee, a Participant may at any time request, by written notice to the Committee, to have the monthly payments scheduled to be made to him or her within a tax year paid to him or her in one installment within such year.

(d) Amounts credited to a Participant's Charitable Contribution Account that are to be distributed to a Tax Exempt Organization shall be so distributed as a lump-sum payment within 60 days after the end of the Plan Period for which the Charitable Election was made; provided, however, that in the event of the death of a Participant who has made a Charitable Election, amounts credited to the Participant's Charitable Contribution Account shall be distributed to the Tax Exempt Organization as a lump-sum payment within 90 days after the Participant's death.

(e) Distributions from the Deferred Stock Account shall be in Common Shares of the Corporation. The Common Shares available for issuance under this Plan shall be issued under, and in accordance with the terms of, the Otter Tail Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. Upon distribution, one Common Share shall be issued for each restricted stock unit, except that no fractional shares shall be issued, and the Participant shall receive a cash payment in lieu of any fractional share. By written notice on Schedule A to the Plan filed with the Committee, a Participant may elect to have a distribution of his or her Deferred Stock Account commence (i) within 30 days after the date the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation, (ii) 12

9

months after the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation or (iii) 24 months after the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation. Any such election, or any change in such election (by subsequent written notice to the Committee), shall apply only to future deferrals. In the event no election is made as to the commencement of the distribution, such distribution shall commence within 30 days after the date the Participant ceases to be a Director of the Corporation. The actual date that the distribution shall commence shall be a date within the appropriate period determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(f) By written notice on Schedule A to the Plan filed with the Committee, a Participant may choose to receive the distribution of his or her Deferred Stock Account in the form of (i) one lump-sum payment or (ii) annual distributions over a period selected by the Participant of up to 10 years. If a Participant does not make a choice as to the manner of distribution of his or her Deferred Stock Account, such distribution shall be made in the form of a lump-sum payment. In the event a lump-sum payment is made under the Plan, a certificate representing the Common Shares payable for the whole number of restricted stock units credited to the Participant's Deferred Stock Account shall be delivered to the Participant or the Participant's Beneficiary, as the case may be, along with cash in payment of any fractional share, on the date determined under Section 6(d). In the case of a distribution over a period of years, the Corporation shall pay to the Participant, commencing on the date determined under Section 6(d), annual installments from the number of restricted stock units then credited to the Participant's Deferred Stock Account, including additional restricted stock units credited as a result of the deemed reinvestment of Dividend Equivalents credited to the Participant's account. The amount of each installment shall be determined by dividing the then unpaid balance of restricted stock units by the number of installments remaining to be paid. A certificate representing the whole number of

10

Common Shares payable for such installment shall be delivered to the Participant or the Participant's Beneficiary, as the case may be, along with cash in payment of any fractional share. The value of any fractional share shall be based upon the average of the high and low sale prices of a Common Share of the Corporation as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System on the business day preceding the payment date. The Participant or the Participant's Beneficiary, as the case may be, shall have no rights as a holder of Common Shares unless and until a certificate for the shares is issued by the Corporation.

(g) In the event of a Participant's death, the balance of a Participant's Deferred Cash Account or Deferred Stock Account, as the case may be, shall be distributed to the Participant's Beneficiary(ies) over a period of not more than five years or in a lump sum, in accordance with the Participant's choice on Schedule B to the Plan filed with the Committee. Such distribution shall commence within 30 days after the Participant's death, on a date within such month to be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Additional annual payments for distributions made over a period of more than one year shall be made on the yearly anniversaries of such date. In the event of a Participant's death after distribution of the Deferred Cash Account or Deferred Stock Account, as the case may be, has commenced, any choice under this Section 6(f) shall not extend time of payment of such Account beyond the time when distribution would have been completed if the Participant had lived. A Participant may change Beneficiary designations by filing a subsequent Schedule B with the Committee. If a Participant does not make a choice as to the manner of distribution of his or her Deferred Cash Account or Deferred Stock Account, as the case may be, in the event of death, any such distribution shall be made as a lump-sum payment to his or her estate within 30 days after the Participant's death.

11

(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, if the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion that the time of payment of a Participant's Deferred Compensation Account should be advanced because of protracted illness or other undue hardship, then the Committee may advance the time or times of payment (whether before or after the Director's retirement date) only if the Committee determines that an emergency beyond the control of the Participant exists and which would cause such Participant severe financial hardship if the payment of such benefits were not approved. Any such distribution for hardship shall be limited to the amount needed to meet such emergency. A Participant who receives a hardship distribution may not reenter the Plan for 12 months after the date of such distribution. Any distribution for hardship under this Section 6(h) shall commence or be made within 30 days after the Committee determines to make such hardship distribution.

7. ASSIGNMENT. No benefit under the Plan shall in any manner or to any extent be assigned, alienated, or transferred by any Participant or Beneficiary or subject to attachment, garnishment, or other legal process.

8. TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT. The Committee may terminate the Plan at any time so that no further amounts shall be credited to Deferred Compensation Accounts or may, from time to time, amend the Plan, without the consent of Participants or Beneficiaries; provided, however, that no such amendment or termination shall impair any rights which have accrued under the Plan.

12

SCHEDULE A

IRREVOCABLE ELECTION

under the
Otter Tail Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2003

THIS IRREVOCABLE ELECTION is being made pursuant to the Otter Tail Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2003 (the "Plan"). Any election under any Section specified below which changes a prior election under the Plan shall apply only to subsequent Plan Periods, as defined in the Plan. Terms used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Plan.

SECTION 1. DEFERRAL ELECTION.

I hereby irrevocably elect to defer receipt of all or part of my retainer and/or meeting fees pursuant to the terms of the Plan and this Irrevocable Election, as indicated below:

______ % of retainer

______ % of meeting fees

SECTION 2. CHARITABLE ELECTION.

I hereby elect to have a Tax Exempt Organization receive ____% of my deferred retainer and/or meeting fees, plus accruals thereon, to be distributed as a lump-sum cash payment within 60 days after the end of each Plan Period, subject to the terms of the Plan. I understand that my Charitable Election will remain in effect until I change it, subject to the terms of the Plan.

Subject to the Committee's approval, I hereby recommend:


Name of Tax Exempt Organization


Address


Contact


Telephone Number

13

as the recipient of distributions from my Charitable Contribution Account. I certify that ______________________ qualifies as an organization described in
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. I understand that the Committee is not bound by my recommendation and has the authority to designate an alternate Tax Exempt Organization to receive the distributions.

SECTION 3. FORM OF PAYMENT.

I hereby irrevocably elect to receive payment of the amounts deferred in accordance with my election in Section 1 above and the terms of the Plan, in the form indicated below:

______    Cash

______    Common Shares of Otter Tail Corporation. I
          understand that no actual shares will be issued in
          my name until I receive a distribution from the Plan
          and, until such time, my Deferred Stock Account will
          be credited with restricted stock units and Dividend
          Equivalents, which will be converted into additional
          restricted stock units, as described in the Plan.

SECTION 4. TIMING OF DISTRIBUTION.

I hereby irrevocably elect, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, to have the distribution from my Deferred Cash Account and/or Deferred Stock Account, excluding any amounts subject to a Charitable Election, to commence or be made as follows:

______    within 30 days after I cease to be a Director of the
          Corporation

______    12 months after I cease to be a Director of the
          Corporation

______    24 months after I cease to be a Director of the
          Corporation

I understand that if no election is made, my distribution will commence or be made within 30 days after I cease to be a Director of the Corporation.

SECTION 5. NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTIONS FROM DEFERRED CASH ACCOUNT.

I hereby elect, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, to receive my cash distributions from my Deferred Cash Account under the Plan, excluding any amounts subject to a Charitable Election, as indicated below:

______    In one lump sum

______    In monthly installments over a period of ______
          years (not to exceed 10 years)

14

I understand that if no election is made, my cash distribution will be made in monthly installments over a period of five years.

SECTION 6. NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTIONS FROM DEFERRED STOCK ACCOUNT.

I hereby elect, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, to receive my stock distributions from my Deferred Stock Account under the Plan, as indicated below:

______    In one lump sum

______    In annual installments over a period of ______ years
          (not to exceed 10 years)

I understand that if no election is made, my stock distribution will be made in one lump-sum payment.

I further understand that payment from my Deferred Stock Account will be in the form of Common Shares of the Corporation.

SECTION 7. SIGNATURE.

I understand that the above elections are subject to the terms of the Plan. I acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan. I certify that my elections are not being made in reliance upon any financial or tax advice given by the Corporation. I understand that I should consult my own tax advisor as to the tax consequences of my elections.

__________________________                    __________________________________
Witness                                       Participant's Signature

                                              __________________________________
                                              Date

15

SCHEDULE B

BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION FORM

under the

Otter Tail Corporation

Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2003

SECTION 1. METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION IN CASE OF DEATH.

In case of my death, I hereby elect, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, to have the distribution of my Deferred Compensation Account paid to my Beneficiary(ies) designated in Section 2 hereof as indicated below:

____ In one lump sum

____ In annual installments over a period of ___ years (not to exceed five years)

I understand that if no election is made, a lump-sum payment will be made to my Beneficiary(ies) or estate within 30 days of my death. I further understand that payments from my Deferred Stock Account, if any, will be in the form of Common Shares of Otter Tail Corporation.

I UNDERSTAND THAT IF I HAVE MADE A CHARITABLE ELECTION UNDER THE PLAN, AMOUNTS THAT ARE TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION WILL BE PAID TO THE TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION IN THE EVENT OF MY DEATH, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE PLAN.

SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY(IES).

In the event of my death, I hereby designate the following individuals, fiduciaries or other entities, either in their own right or in their representative capacity, in the proportions and in the priority of interest designated, to be the beneficiaries of any benefits owing to me, under the Plan.

PRIMARY BENEFICIARIES - The following beneficiary(ies) shall receive all benefits payable under the Plan in the event of my death in the proportions designated hereunder. If any one or more of the primary beneficiaries designated hereunder shall predecease me, such beneficiary's share(s) shall be divided equally among the remaining primary beneficiaries.

16

                                   PROPORTIONATE
  NAME AND PRESENT ADDRESS       INTEREST OF PRIMARY         RELATIONSHIP TO
OF PRIMARY BENEFICIARY(IES)        BENEFICIARY(IES)              EMPLOYEE
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________

_______________________       ___________________________
Date                          Participant's Initials

      SECONDARY BENEFICIARIES - The following beneficiary(ies) shall receive all

benefits payable under the Plan in the event of my death in the proportions designated hereunder only if all of my Primary Beneficiaries have predeceased me. If all Primary Beneficiaries have predeceased me and if any one or more of the Secondary Beneficiaries designated hereunder shall predecease me, such Secondary Beneficiary's share(s) shall be divided equally among the Secondary Beneficiaries.

                                     PROPORTIONATE
   NAME AND PRESENT ADDRESS           INTEREST OF
        OF SECONDARY                   SECONDARY               RELATIONSHIP
      BENEFICIARY(IES)              BENEFICIARY(IES)            TO EMPLOYEE
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________
___________________________      ___________________%        _________________

ESTATE - In the event I have declined to designate a Beneficiary hereunder or if all of the Beneficiaries that I have designated predecease me, then all benefits payable under the Plan shall be payable to my Estate.

_______________________________             ____________________________________
Witness                                     Participant's Signature


                                            ____________________________________
                                            Date

17

.

.
.
Exhibit 13-A

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              2002          2001        2000 (1)   1999 (1)(2)   1998 (3)       1997        1992
                                              ----          ----        --------   -----------   --------       ----        ----

(thousands, except number of shareholders and per-share data)
REVENUES
Electric                                    $307,403      $307,684      $262,280     $233,527    227,477      $205,121    $177,105
Plastics                                      82,931        63,216        82,667       31,504     24,946        24,953          --
Manufacturing                                142,390       123,436        97,506       87,086     62,488        58,221          --
Health services                               93,420        79,129        66,319       68,805     69,412        66,859          --
Other business operations                     83,972        80,667        78,159       68,322     48,829        44,173      32,433
                                            --------      --------      --------     --------    -------      --------    --------
   Total operating revenues                 $710,116      $654,132      $586,931     $489,244    433,152      $399,327    $209,538

SPECIAL CHARGES                                   --            --            --           --      9,522            --          --
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS             46,128        43,603        41,042       45,295     30,701        32,346      26,538
CUMULATIVE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE         --            --            --           --      3,819            --          --
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS                     76,797        77,529        61,761       81,850     63,959        69,398      44,866
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES                          75,533        53,596        46,273       35,245     29,289        41,973      22,616
TOTAL ASSETS                                 878,736       782,541       737,708      694,341    655,612       655,441     530,456
LONG-TERM DEBT                               258,229       227,360       195,128      180,159    181,046       189,973     159,295
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED                              --            --        18,000       18,000     18,000        18,000      18,000
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS(3)(4)                                1.80          1.69          1.59         1.75       1.20          1.29        1.08
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS(3)(4)                                1.79          1.68          1.59         1.75       1.20          1.29        1.08
RETURN ON AVERAGE COMMON EQUITY                 15.3%         15.5%         15.4%        18.4%      15.0%         14.9%       15.0%
DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE                      1.06          1.04          1.02         0.99       0.96          0.93        0.82
DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO                             59%           62%           64%          57%        71%           72%         76%
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING -YEAR END           25,592        24,653        24,574       24,571     23,759        23,462      22,360
NUMBER OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS (5)             14,503        14,358        14,103       13,438     13,699        13,753      13,812

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:
(1) Restated to reflect the effects of two 2001 acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method. The impact of the poolings on years prior to 1999 is not material.
(2) During 1999 radio station assets were sold for a net gain of $8.1 million or 34 cents per share.
(3) In the first quarter of 1998 the Company changed its method of electric revenue recognition in the states of Minnesota and South Dakota from meter-reading dates to energy-delivery dates. Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations does not include 16 cents per share related to the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle.
(4) Based on average number of shares outstanding.
(5) Holders of record at year end.


Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations

The primary financial goals of Otter Tail Corporation (the Company) are to maximize its earnings and cash flows and to allocate capital profitably toward growth opportunities that will increase shareholder value. Management meets these objectives by earning the returns regulators allow in electric operations combined with successfully growing nonelectric operations. Meeting these objectives enables the Company to preserve and enhance its financial capability by maintaining optimal capitalization ratios and a strong interest coverage position, and preserving strong credit ratings on outstanding securities, which in the form of lower interest rates benefits both the Company's customers and shareholders.

LIQUIDITY

The Company believes its financial condition is strong and that its cash, other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to equity capital markets and borrowing ability because of strong credit ratings, when taken together, provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements and future capital expenditures related to expansion of existing businesses and development of new projects. However, the Company's operating cash flow and access to capital markets can be impacted by macroeconomic factors outside its control. In addition, the Company's borrowing costs can be impacted by its short and long-term debt ratings assigned by independent rating agencies, which in part are based on certain credit measures such as interest coverage and leverage ratios.

The Company has achieved a high degree of long-term liquidity by maintaining desired capitalization ratios and strong credit ratings, implementing cost-containment programs, and investing in projects that provide returns in excess of the Company's weighted average cost of capital.

Cash provided by operating activities of $76.8 million combined with cash on hand of $11.4 million at December 31, 2001, allowed the Company to pay dividends and finance 80% of its capital expenditures. Its remaining capital expenditures were financed through the issuance of long-term debt.

Cash provided by operating activities in 2002 was $76.8 million compared with cash provided by operating activities of $77.5 million in 2001. The decrease reflects a combination of a $2.5 million increase in net income, a $4.1 million change in deferred taxes and a $3.3 million decrease in cash used for deferred debits and other assets, offset by a $10.4 million increase in cash used for working capital items.

(side-by-side bar graph of data with cash realization ratio data labels in the following table)

CASH REALIZATION RATIOS
(millions)

                                               1998              1999              2000              2001              2002
                                               ----              ----              ----              ----              ----
Cash flows from operations                     $64               $82               $62               $78               $77
Net income                                     $35               $45               $41               $44               $46
Cash realization ratios                        183%              182%              151%              177%              166%

The cash realization ratio represents cash flows from operations expressed as a percent of net income.

(end of graph)

(stacked bar graph of data in the following table)

CAPITAL STRUCTURE
(millions)

                                               1998              1999              2000              2001              2002
                                               ----              ----              ----              ----              ----
Long-term debt and current maturities          $187              $189              $209              $256              $266
Preferred stock                                $39               $34               $34               $16               $16
Common equity                                  $225              $249              $263              $279              $313


Otter Tail has maintained a balanced capital structure for several years with common equity staying near 50% of total capital.

(end of graph)

The $18.5 million increase in net cash used in investing activities between 2002 and 2001 reflects an increase in capital expenditures of $21.9 million offset by a $2.4 million reduction in cash used to complete acquisitions. In the electric segment, capital expenditures increased by $10.9 million mostly related to in-progress construction of a new gas-fired combustion turbine and construction of a new transmission line in North Dakota completed in the fourth quarter of 2002. In the manufacturing segment, capital expenditures increased by $4.5 million reflecting structural modifications and the purchase of new equipment totaling $8.7 million at the Company's metal parts stamping company and $3.8 million in plant expansion expenditures at the Company's wind tower manufacturing company. In the plastics segment, capital expenditures increased by $4.0 million mainly reflecting the purchase of a building that was previously being rented. Capital expenditures at our transportation company increased by $1.8 million reflecting the purchase of trucks and trailers for its company-owned fleet.

In 2002, the Company completed five acquisitions. Three of the acquisitions were completed through an exchange of 718,321 shares of Company common stock and cash for the capital stock of the acquired companies. The other two were cash-for-asset acquisitions. The total cash consideration paid by the Company for these five acquisitions, net of cash acquired, aggregated $6.6 million.


Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.4 million for 2002 compared with $6.3 million used in financing activities in 2001. The $7.7 million increase between the years is due to the following:

- Net proceeds from short-term borrowings were $25.5 million higher in 2002 than in 2001.

- Net proceeds from long-term debt financing activities in 2002 were $37.4 million less than net proceeds generated from long-term debt financing activities in 2001.

- The Company retired $18 million in preferred stock in 2001 with the issuance of long-term debt while no preferred stock was retired in 2002.

- Proceeds from employee stock plans increased by $1.7 million in 2002 over 2001. Dividend payments increased by $0.1 million in 2002.

In 2002, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a shelf registration statement for $200 million of unsecured debt securities. On September 27, 2002 the Company issued $65 million of senior unsecured notes under the shelf registration statement. The offering consisted of $40 million of 5.625% insured senior notes due 2017 and $25 million of 6.80% senior notes due 2032. Net proceeds from these issues were used to pay off short-term debt that was used to retire the Company's 7.25% series first mortgage bonds at maturity on August 1, 2002 in the amount of $18.2 million, and to retire early on October 31, 2002 the Company's outstanding $27.3 million 8.25% series 2022 first mortgage bonds at an aggregate redemption price of $28.5 million. The remaining proceeds were used to repay short-term debt used to finance a portion of the costs related to the new gas-fired combustion turbine plant being constructed by the electric utility. Proceeds from subsequent debt issuances under the shelf registration, if any, may be used for other general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayment, the financing of possible acquisitions or stock repurchases.

As a result of the financing described above, the Company repaid all of its outstanding first mortgage bonds and terminated its first mortgage indenture.

On December 2, 2002 the Company retired its 5.00% industrial development refunding revenue bonds at maturity in the amount of $3.0 million.

During 2002, 131,167 shares of common stock were issued for stock options exercised under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan generating proceeds of $2.6 million. Also in 2002, the Company granted 85,800 shares of restricted stock to certain key executives and nonemployee directors and issued 3,382 common shares for director compensation under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The Company also issued 718,321 common shares as consideration in connection with three acquisitions in 2002.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

The Company has a capital expenditure program for the expansion, upgrade and improvement of its plants and operating equipment. Typical uses of cash for capital improvements are investments in electric generation facilities, transmission and distribution lines, equipment used in the manufacturing process, acquisitions of diagnostic medical equipment, transportation equipment and computer hardware and information systems. The capital expenditure program is subject to review and is revised annually in light of changes in demands for energy, technology, environmental laws, regulatory changes, the costs of labor, materials and equipment, and the Company's consolidated financial condition.

Consolidated capital expenditures for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $75.5 million, $53.6 million and $46.3 million, respectively. The estimated capital expenditures for 2003 are $47.7 million and the total capital expenditures for the five-year period 2003 through 2007 are expected to be approximately $240 million.


The breakdown of 2002 actual and 2003 through 2007 estimated capital expenditures by segment is as follows:

                                            2002    2003    2003-2007
                                            ----    ----    ---------
                                                (in millions)
Electric                                     $46     $30       $146
Plastics                                       6       5         14
Manufacturing                                 15       6         45
Health services                                4       3          9
Other business operations                      5       4         26
                                             ---     ---       ----
            Total                            $76     $48       $240
                                             ===     ===       ====

(stacked bar graph of data with interest-bearing debt as a percent of total capital data labels in the following table)

INTEREST-BEARING DEBT AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL CAPITAL
(millions)

                                            1998              1999              2000              2001              2002
                                            ----              ----              ----              ----              ----
Total capital                               $452              $472              $506              $551              $625
Interest-bearing debt (includes
 short-term debt)                           $188              $189              $209              $256              $296
Interest-bearing debt
 as a percent of total capital              42%               40%               41%               46%               47%

Otter Tail has maintained a 40-50% debt to total capital ratio for the past five years. The increase from 2000 to 2001 reflects the issuance of debt to retire a preferred stock series.

(end of graph)

(bar graph of data in the following table)

LONG-TERM DEBT INTEREST COVERAGE
(times interest earned before tax)

1998              1999              2000              2001              2002
----              ----              ----              ----              ----
4.3               6.0               4.8               5.2               5.1

Otter Tail has maintained coverage ratios in excess of its debt covenant requirements.

(end of graph)

The $16 million planned decrease in capital expenditures for the electric segment for 2003 as compared to 2002 reflects completion of the Company-owned portion of a large transmission line project in North Dakota in 2002 and the completion of the new gas-fired combustion turbine in 2003. The $9 million planned decrease in capital expenditures in the manufacturing segment from 2002 to 2003 reflects the completion of major structural modifications and equipment purchases at the Company's metal parts stamping company and the completion of a plant expansion project at the Company's wind tower manufacturing company in 2002.

The following table summarizes the Company's contractual obligations at December 31, 2002 and the effect these obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

                                                              1         2-3         4-5       After 5
December 31, (in millions)                     Total       year       years       years         years
--------------------------                     -----       ----       -----       -----       -------
Long-term debt                                  $266        $ 8         $13         $54          $191
Coal contracts (required minimums)                93         15          20          10            48
Construction program (purchase orders)             7          7          --          --            --
Capacity and energy requirements                  67         15          27          25            --
Operating leases                                  65         20          29          12             4
                                                ----        ---         ---        ----          ----
Total contractual cash obligations              $498        $65         $89        $101          $243
                                                ====        ===         ===        ====          ====


CAPITAL RESOURCES

Financial flexibility is provided by unused lines of credit, strong financial coverages and credit ratings, and alternative financing arrangements such as leasing.

For the period 2003 through 2007, the Company estimates that funds internally generated net of forecasted dividend payments, combined with funds on hand, will be sufficient to meet scheduled debt retirements, provide for its estimated consolidated capital expenditures and pay off most of its currently outstanding short-term debt. Reduced demand for electricity or products manufactured and sold by the Company could have an effect on funds internally generated. Additional short-term or long-term financing will be required in the period 2003 through 2007 in the event the Company decides to refund or retire early any of its presently outstanding debt or cumulative preferred shares, to complete acquisitions or for other corporate purposes. There can be no assurance that any additional required financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt or equity financing or otherwise, or that if such financing is available, it will be available on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The Company has the ability to issue up to an additional $135 million of unsecured debt securities from time to time under its shelf registration statement on file with the SEC.

The Company has a $50 million line of credit. This line of credit bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 0.5% and expires on April 29, 2003. The Company does not anticipate any difficulties in renewing this line of credit. The Company's bank line of credit is a key source of operating capital and can provide interim financing of working capital and other capital requirements, if needed. The Company's obligations under this line of credit are guaranteed by a 100%-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns substantially all of the Company's nonelectric companies. As of December 31, 2002, $30 million of the $50 million line was in use and the Company had $9.9 million in cash and cash equivalents.

The Company's line of credit and its $90 million 6.63% senior notes due 2011 contain a number of covenants that restrict the Company's ability, with significant exceptions, to: engage in mergers or consolidations; dispose of assets; create liens on assets; engage in transactions with affiliates; take any action which would result in a decrease in the ownership interest in any subsidiary; redeem stock or any subsidiary's stock and pay dividends on stock; make investments, loans or advances; guaranty the obligations of other persons or agree to maintain the net worth or working capital of, or provide funds to satisfy any other financial test applicable to, any other person; and enter into a contract that requires payment to be made by the Company whether or not delivery of the materials, supplies or services is ever made under the contract.

In addition, specified financial covenants under the line of credit and the 6.63% senior notes require a debt-to-total capitalization ratio not in excess of 60% and an interest and dividend coverage ratio of at least 1.5 to 1. The 6.63% senior notes also require that priority debt not be in excess of 20% of total capitalization.

As of December 31, 2002 the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under its line of credit and its other debt obligations.

The interest rate under the line of credit is subject to adjustment in the event of a change in ratings on the Company's senior unsecured debt, up to LIBOR plus 0.8% if the ratings on the Company's senior unsecured debt fall to BBB+ or below (Standard & Poor's) or Baa1 or below (Moody's). The line of credit also provides for accelerated repayment in the event the Company's long-term senior unsecured debt is rated below BBB- (Standard & Poor's) or Baa3 (Moody's).


The Company's securities ratings at December 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                                       Moody's
                                Fitch                 Investors               Standard
                               Ratings                 Service                & Poor's
                               -------                 -------                --------
Senior unsecured debt             A+                     A2                       A
Preferred stock                   A                      Baa1                     A-
Outlook                         Stable                 Negative                 Stable

The Company's disclosure of these securities ratings is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold its securities. Downgrades in these securities ratings could adversely affect the Company. Further downgrades could increase borrowing costs resulting in possible reductions to net income in future periods and increase the risk of default on the Company's debt obligations.

The Company's 6.63% senior notes contain an investment grade put that could require the Company to prepay this series with a make-whole premium if the Company's senior unsecured debt is rated below Baa3 (Moody's) or BBB- (Standard & Poor's). The Company's obligations under the 6.63% senior notes are guaranteed by a 100%-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns substantially all of the Company's nonelectric companies. The Company's Grant County and Mercer County pollution control refunding revenue bonds require that the Company grant to Ambac Assurance Corporation, under a financial guaranty insurance policy relating to the bonds, a security interest in the assets of the electric utility if the rating on the Company's senior unsecured debt is downgraded to Baa2 or below (Moody's) or BBB or below (Standard & Poor's and Fitch). The Company believes the risk of the downgrade events described in this paragraph occurring is remote based on the current debt ratings of the Company combined with its strong debt-to-equity ratio and ability to generate cash from operations.

The Company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 3.9x for 2002 compared to 4.2x for 2001 and its long-term debt interest coverage ratio before taxes was 5.1x for 2002 compared to 5.2x for 2001. The main reason for the reduction in these coverage ratios is the refinancing of the Company's $18 million of $6.35 preferred stock with interest-bearing debt in December 2001. During 2003, the Company expects these coverage ratios to remain similar to 2002.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company does not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships. These entities are often referred to as structured finance special purpose entities or variable interest entities, which are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes. The Company is not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if it had such relationships.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Results of Operations

The Company recorded diluted earnings per share of $1.79 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $1.68 for the year ended December 31, 2001. In 2001, goodwill amortization reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.09. In 2002, the amortization of goodwill was discontinued in accordance with a new accounting standard. Total operating revenues for 2002 were $710.1 million compared with $654.1 million for 2001. Operating income was $82.0 million for the year 2002 compared with $77.5 million for 2001. Growth in revenues and operating income from the plastics and health services segments offset decreases in operating income from the electric, manufacturing and other business operations segments.


Electric

Otter Tail Power Company, a division of Otter Tail Corporation, provides electrical service to more than 127,000 customers in a service territory exceeding 50,000 square miles.

                                               2002         2001          2000
                                             --------     --------     --------
                                                      (in thousands)
Operating revenues                           $307,403     $307,684     $262,280
Production fuel                                44,122       41,776       38,546
Purchased power                                94,694       99,491       66,121
Other operation and maintenance expenses       80,534       75,531       74,591
Depreciation and amortization                  24,910       24,272       23,778
Property taxes                                  9,423        9,464        9,976
                                             --------     --------     --------
Operating income                             $ 53,720     $ 57,150     $ 49,268
                                             ========     ========     ========

(bar graph of data in the following table)

ELECTRIC OPERATING INCOME
(millions)

 2000              2001              2002
 ----              ----              ----
$49.3             $57.2             $53.7

(end of graph)

While overall electric operating revenues remained essentially the same in 2002 as in 2001, retail sales revenues increased $7.8 million, wholesale power revenues decreased $16.1 million and other electric revenue increased $8.1 million. The increase in retail revenue reflects a 2.4% increase in retail kilowatt-hour (kwh) sales along with a $3.9 million increase in cost-of-energy (COE) revenue.

The increase in retail sales reflects increased usage by residential and commercial customers partially offset by a decrease in usage by industrial customers. Heating-degree-days totaled 9,033 in 2002 compared with 8,575 in 2001, an increase of 5.3%. Heating-degree-days are a measure of the total daily degrees by which daily average temperatures are below 65 degrees Fahrenheit. With a number of customers heating with electricity, changes in electricity consumption can often be explained by the magnitude of change in heating-degree-days. The increase in COE revenues reflects an 11.5% increase in fuel and purchased power costs per kwh for system use in 2002 compared with 2001 (see discussion below). Wholesale energy revenues decreased 16.4% between the years. While wholesale kwh sales grew 7.8% between the years, revenue per kwh sold decreased by 22.5% resulting in a reduction of wholesale energy gross margins. The decrease in wholesale electric prices may be partially attributable to peaking generation added in the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) region since September 2001, as well as regional demand for electricity. The increase in other electric operating revenues is primarily due to revenue earned on a large transmission line construction project completed for another regional utility in 2002.

The 5.6% increase in production fuel expense in 2002 compared with 2001 is primarily due to a 13.7% increase in fuel costs per kwh produced at the electric utility's coal-fired generating stations. The increase in fuel costs per kwh produced is due to higher costs reflected in new coal contracts that went into effect at the beginning of 2002 and increased freight rates for the shipping of coal to Big Stone and Hoot Lake Plants. In 2001, coal was being shipped to Big Stone Plant under a negotiated agreement that expired at the end of 2001. Currently, coal is being shipped to Big Stone Plant under a tariff rate that is set through December 2003.


Although the volume of kwh purchases increased by 18.4% in 2002 over 2001, purchased power expense decreased by 4.8% due to a 19.6% decrease in the cost per kwh purchased. The volume of power purchased in 2002 increased for both system use and resale purposes. The increase in kwh purchases was to provide for the increase in wholesale energy sales, to meet system demand and to replace the loss of generation at Big Stone Plant during six weeks of scheduled maintenance in the fall of 2002.

The 6.6% increase in other operation and maintenance expenses includes $3.8 million in material costs incurred in the construction of a transmission line for another regional utility and $2.0 million in increased employee benefit expenses offset by a $1.0 million decrease in external services expenses. The 2.6% increase in depreciation and amortization expense for 2002 compared to 2001 is due to an increase in the electric utility's composite depreciation rate from 3.06% in 2001 to 3.08% in 2002 and an increase in depreciable plant base as a result of recent capital expenditures.

Growth is not expected in the electric segment in 2003. Margins on wholesale electric sales are expected to remain tight in 2003 due to the added generating capacity in the MAPP region. Income from electrical construction and maintenance work for outside entities scheduled for 2003 will not replicate profits earned on the large transmission project completed for another regional utility in 2002. Another factor affecting the electric segment's financial performance will be increased pension costs, which are expected to be about $4.1 million before tax in 2003 compared to net pension income of $1.0 million before tax in 2002. The reasons for the increase in pension costs are a lower return on plan assets during 2002, a change in the assumed long-term rate of return from 9.5% in 2002 to 8.5% in 2003 and a decrease in the assumed discount rate from 7.5% in 2002 to 6.75% in 2003. See "Critical accounting policies involving significant estimates
- Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations and costs."

Electric operating revenues for 2001 increased 17.3% over 2000 due to a $33.5 million increase in wholesale power revenues, a $10.2 million increase in retail revenues and a $1.7 million increase in other electric revenues. The increase in wholesale power revenues resulted from a 16.4% increase in wholesale prices combined with a 30.2% increase in wholesale kwh sales. The increase in wholesale sales is the result of the electric utility's increased activity and involvement in wholesale markets. The increase in retail sales revenue is due to a 2.9% increase in retail kwh sales along with a $6.3 million increase in cost-of-energy revenue. In addition to a $1.9 million refund of fuel costs resulting from a coal contract arbitration settlement in 2000, the increase in cost-of-energy revenues reflects increases in fuel and purchased power costs per kwh for system use in 2001 as compared to 2000. Increases in retail kwh sold occurred in all customer categories except streetlighting, with commercial having the largest increase. The $1.7 million increase in other electric revenues reflects an increase in transmission service revenues and increases in revenues mainly related to construction service contracts for other utilities.

The 8.4% increase in production fuel expense in 2001 over 2000 is due to the following: a 4.4% increase in kilowatt-hours generated combined with a 0.8% increase in the fuel cost per kwh generated and a reduction in 2000 fuel expenses of $1.9 million related to the Knife River coal arbitration settlement. Excluding the impact of this settlement, production fuel expenses increased 3.3%. The 50.5% increase in purchased power expense is the result of a 24.2% increase in kwh purchases combined with a 21.2% increase in the cost per kwh purchased. While kwh purchases for resale increased 49.4% to provide for the increase in wholesale sales of electricity, kwh purchases for retail sales were down 26.9% in 2001 compared to 2000.

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased 1.3% in 2001 compared to 2000, mainly due to a 3.1% increase in operating and maintenance labor expense. In addition, other operation and maintenance expense for 2000 included a credit of $1.0 million that was recorded as part of the Knife River arbitration settlement that recovered previously recorded arbitration expenses. See note 3 to consolidated financial statements.


The 2.1% increase in depreciation and amortization expense for 2001 compared to 2000 is due to an increase in depreciable plant base as a result of recent capital expenditures. Property taxes decreased 5.1% for 2001 compared to 2000 due to a legislative reduction in tax capacity rates used to determine Minnesota property taxes. In addition, under a new state law in Minnesota, generation machinery and attached equipment were exempted for Minnesota property taxes. The effect of the reduction in property taxes is refunded to retail electric customers on an ongoing basis.

Plastics

Plastics consists of businesses involved in the production of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe in the Upper Midwest and Southwest regions of the United States.

                                          2002         2001          2000
                                         -------     --------      -------
                                                  (in thousands)
Operating revenues                       $82,931     $ 63,216      $82,667
Cost of goods sold                        65,432       57,932       66,286
Operating expenses                         4,603        3,446        4,335
Depreciation and amortization              1,760        1,726        1,798
Amortization of goodwill                      --        1,503        1,503
                                         -------     --------      -------
Operating income (loss)                  $11,136     $ (1,391)     $ 8,745
                                         =======     ========      =======

(bar graph of data in the following table)

PLASTICS OPERATING INCOME
(millions)

2000               2001              2002
----               ----              ----
$8.7              ($1.4)            $11.1

(end of graph)

The 31.2% increase in plastics operating revenues for 2002 compared with 2001 reflects a 23.0% increase in pounds of PVC pipe sold combined with a 6.6% increase in the average sales price per pound. The 12.9% increase in cost of goods sold reflects $14.6 million in costs related to the increase in PVC pipe sold offset by a $7.1 million reduction in costs due to a 7.0% decrease in the price per pound of PVC resin. Operating expenses increased 33.6% primarily due to increases in sales commissions and incentive compensation related to increased profitability in this segment. In 2002, the amortization of goodwill was discontinued in accordance with a new accounting standard.

The Company does not expect the business conditions that contributed to the record earnings in the plastics segment in 2002 to be duplicated in 2003. Gross margins decline when the supply of PVC pipe increases faster than demand. The gross margin percentage is sensitive to PVC raw material resin prices and the demand for PVC pipe. Due to the commodity nature of PVC resin and the dynamic supply and demand factors worldwide, it is very difficult to predict gross margin percentages or assume that historical trends will continue.

The 23.5% decrease in plastics operating revenues for 2001 compared with 2000 is due to a 29.5% decline in average sales price per pound offset by an 8.5% increase in pounds of PVC pipe sold. The decline in PVC resin prices combined with an oversupply of finished PVC pipe products were the main factors in the decrease in average sales price per pound. The decrease of 12.6% in cost of goods sold reflects a 19.5% decrease in the average cost per pound of PVC pipe sold. The selling price per pound of PVC pipe was affected by the change in raw material cost of PVC resin. Operating expenses decreased 20.5% primarily due to a reduction in labor costs and selling expenses.


For 2002, 58.3% of raw material was purchased from two vendors, with 41.2% supplied by four other vendors. The loss of a key supplier or any interruption or delay in the supply of PVC resin could have a significant impact on the operations of the plastics segment.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing consists of businesses involved in the production of waterfront equipment, wind towers, frame-straightening equipment and accessories for the auto body shop industry, custom plastic pallets, material and handling trays and horticultural containers, fabrication of steel products, contract machining and metal parts stamping and fabricating. During 2002, two acquisitions were completed in this segment using the purchase method of accounting. On May 28, 2002 the Company acquired the outstanding stock of ShoreMaster, Inc. (ShoreMaster). On October 1, 2002 the Company acquired the outstanding stock of Galva Foam Marine Industries, Inc. (Galva Foam). During 2001, three acquisitions were completed in this segment. On February 28, 2001 the Company acquired the outstanding stock of T.O. Plastics, Inc. On September 28, 2001 the Company acquired the outstanding stock of St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc. These two acquisitions were completed using the pooling-of-interests method of accounting. On November 1, 2001 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Titan Steel Corporation using the purchase method of accounting. See note 2 to consolidated financial statements.

                                           2002         2001        2000
                                         --------     --------     -------
                                                   (in thousands)
Operating revenues                       $142,390     $123,436     $97,506
Cost of goods sold                        107,736       91,360      72,639
Operating expenses                         18,358       14,762      13,992
Depreciation and amortization               6,525        4,858       3,672
Amortization of goodwill                       --          281         258
                                         --------     --------     -------
Operating income                         $  9,771     $ 12,175     $ 6,945
                                         ========     ========     =======

(bar graph of data in the following table)

MANUFACTURING OPERATING INCOME
(millions)

2000              2001              2002
----              ----              ----
$6.9              $12.2             $9.8

(end of graph)

(bar graph of data in the following table)

The 15.4% increase in manufacturing operating revenues for 2002 compared with 2001 reflects the 2002 acquisitions of ShoreMaster and Galva Foam and increased production and sales of wind towers offset by decreased sales volumes of metal parts stamping and steel fabrication. Cost of goods sold increased 17.9% due to the ShoreMaster and Galva Foam acquisitions and increases of $9.3 million in material and subcontractor costs at the wind tower manufacturing business offset by a $4.8 million reduction in material costs at the metal parts stamping companies. The ShoreMaster and Galva Foam acquisitions accounted for $3.4 million of the $3.6 million increase in operating expenses between the periods and $0.4 million of the increase in depreciation and amortization expense. The remaining $1.3 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense in 2002 compared with 2001 is due to 2001 and 2002 plant expansions and equipment purchases at all the manufacturing companies. In 2002, the amortization of goodwill was discontinued in accordance with a new accounting standard.

The companies in this segment continue to be adversely affected by a slower economy. Uncertainty in the energy industry has directly affected the steel fabrication companies that manufacture equipment for power plants and the wind energy industry.


Manufacturing operating revenues increased 26.6% during 2001 compared to 2000, reflecting increased sales of wind towers combined with increased sales volumes of metal parts stamping, fabrication, and thermoform plastic products. The 25.8% increase in cost of goods sold correlates with increased sales volumes. The 5.5% increase in operating expenses reflects increases in general and administrative expenses offset by reductions in research, development and selling expenses.

Health services

Health services include businesses involved in the sale of diagnostic medical equipment, supplies and accessories. In addition, these businesses also provide service maintenance, mobile diagnostic imaging, mobile PET and nuclear medicine imaging, portable x-ray imaging and rental of diagnostic medical imaging equipment. On May 1, 2002 the Company acquired the outstanding stock of Computed Imaging Service, Inc. On November 1, 2002 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Mobile Diagnostic Services, Inc. On September 4, 2001 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Interim Solutions and Sales, Inc. and Midwest Medical Diagnostics, Inc. On September 10, 2001 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Nuclear Imaging, Ltd. In June 2000 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Portable X-Ray & EKG, Inc. All of these acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. See note 2 to consolidated financial statements.

                                             2002       2001         2000
                                           -------     -------     -------
                                                   (in thousands)
Operating revenues                         $93,420     $79,129     $66,319
Cost of goods sold                          66,670      59,388      49,193
Operating expenses                          13,970       9,362       8,416
Depreciation and amortization                4,410       2,912       2,501
Amortization of goodwill                        --         605         480
                                           -------     -------     -------
Operating income                           $ 8,370     $ 6,862     $ 5,729
                                           =======     =======     =======

HEALTH SERVICES OPERATING INCOME
(millions)

2000              2001              2002
----              ----              ----
$5.7              $6.9              $8.4

(end of graph)

The 18.1% increase in health services operating revenues, 12.3% increase in cost of goods sold, 49.2% increase in operating expenses and the 51.4% increase in depreciation and amortization for 2002 compared with 2001 are primarily due to the acquisitions completed during September 2001 and May 2002. The number of scans performed increased 19.8% due to the acquisitions while the average fee per scan increased 7.6% primarily as a result of the addition of new modalities provided by the companies acquired in September 2001. Revenues from equipment sales decreased 3.4%.

Operating margins improved slightly between the periods due to increases in margins on service sales in the diagnostic equipment imaging business and in the mobile imaging business offset by expenses incurred in the segment's continued investment in and promotion of fixed-based imaging systems. In 2002, the amortization of goodwill was discontinued in accordance with a new accounting standard.

Operating revenues for the health services segment increased 19.3% for 2001 compared with 2000 due to an increase in equipment sales, services and supplies, combined with an increase of 7.4% in scans performed. $4.2 million of the revenue increase was the result of the acquisitions completed in September 2001. As a result of the acquisitions, cost of goods sold increased 20.7% reflecting increased costs of materials and supplies used and sold in the diagnostic equipment imaging business, increased rent expense and other additional expenses. The operating expense increase is related to increased labor costs, selling expenses, insurance expenses and promotion expenses.


Other business operations

The Company's other business operations include businesses involved in electrical and telephone construction contracting, transportation, telecommunications, entertainment, energy services, and natural gas marketing as well as the portion of corporate general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the other segments.

                                          2002          2001         2000
                                        --------      -------      -------
                                                  (in thousands)
Operating revenues                      $ 83,972      $80,667      $78,159
Cost of goods sold                        46,415       41,109       40,938
Operating expenses                        33,564       30,927       27,088
Depreciation and amortization              5,008        5,093        5,669
Amortization of goodwill                      --          850          903
                                        --------      -------      -------
Operating (loss) income                 $ (1,015)     $ 2,688      $ 3,561
                                        ========      =======      =======

(bar graph of data in the following table)

OTHER BUSINESS OPERATIONS OPERATING INCOME (millions)

2000              2001               2002
----              ----               ----
$3.6              $2.7              ($1.0)

(end of graph)

The 4.1% increase in operating revenues in the other business operations segment for 2002 compared with 2001 includes increases of $3.1 million at the energy services company and $1.6 million at the construction subsidiaries, partially offset by a decrease in revenue of $1.4 million at the transportation subsidiary. The increase in operating revenue at the energy services company reflects increased revenue from natural gas sales and increased revenue from the installation of energy efficient lighting equipment on customer premises in 2002 compared with 2001. The increase in operating revenues at the construction subsidiaries reflects an increase in the volume of work performed in 2002 compared with 2001. A decrease of 6.1% in miles driven combined with a 2.4% decrease in revenue per mile led to the decrease in operating revenues at the transportation subsidiary.

The 12.9% increase in cost of goods sold in the other business operations segment for 2002 compared with 2001 includes increases in cost of goods sold of $3.8 million at the energy services company and $1.8 million at the construction subsidiaries that are directly related to increased revenues at those companies. Increased costs in excess of increased operating revenues due to smaller margins on natural gas sales and competition for fewer jobs in the construction segment related to the recent economic slowdown resulted in a $0.9 million decrease in operating margins at those companies from 2001 to 2002. Operating expenses increased 8.5% primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in unallocated corporate costs, a $1.1 million increase in operating expenses at the energy services company and a $337,000 increase in operating expenses at the telecommunications subsidiary mainly due to increases in their provisions for doubtful accounts related to the WorldCom and Global Crossings bankruptcies. A 5.0% decrease in the average cost of diesel fuel per gallon at the transportation subsidiary partially offset the increase in operating expenses at the other companies. In 2002, the amortization of goodwill was discontinued in accordance with a new accounting standard.

The 3.2% increase in operating revenues in the other business operations segment for 2001 compared with 2000 reflects a $2.4 million increase in revenues from the energy services company and $1.7 million from the transportation subsidiary partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in revenues from the construction subsidiaries.


Both operating revenues and cost of goods sold increased for the energy services company as a result of the higher cost of natural gas during the first half of 2001. The increase in cost of goods sold was offset by reductions in this category from the construction subsidiaries. Increased brokerage revenue is the primary reason for the increase in revenue from the transportation subsidiary. The decrease in revenues and cost of goods sold from the construction subsidiaries is due to an overall decline in the number of projects available for the companies to work on in 2001 as compared to 2000. Operating expenses increased 14.2% reflecting increased payments to owner-operators and increased brokerage fees within the transportation subsidiary and increases in insurance expenses. The 10.2% decrease in depreciation and amortization reflects the write down in 2000 of $800,000 of goodwill that was impaired at the energy services company and charged to amortization expense.

On September 1, 1999 the Company acquired the flatbed trucking operations of E. W. Wylie Corporation (Wylie). The Company currently has $6.7 million of goodwill recorded on its balance sheet relating to this acquisition. Highly competitive pricing in the trucking industry in recent years has resulted in decreased operating margins and lower returns on invested capital for Wylie. The Company's current projections are for operating margins to increase from current levels over the next three to five years as demand for shipping increases relative to available shipping capacity and additional revenues are generated from added terminal locations. If current conditions persist and operating margins do not increase according to Company projections, the reductions in anticipated cash flows from transportation operations may indicate that the fair value of Wylie is less than its book value resulting in an impairment of goodwill and a corresponding charge against earnings. At December 31, 2002, assessment of Wylie indicated that its goodwill was not impaired. The Company will continue to evaluate this reporting unit for impairment as conditions warrant.

(bar graph of data in the following table)

OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS
(millions)

2000              2001              2002
----              ----              ----
$2.2              $2.2              $2.1

(end of graph)

Consolidated interest charges

The $1.9 million (11.6%) increase in interest charges in 2002 over 2001 is due to higher long-term debt balances outstanding offset by lower interest rates on less short-term debt outstanding between the years. In late December 2001, the Company sold $90 million of 6.63% senior notes due 2011 and used part of the proceeds to retire $18 million of $6.35 cumulative preferred shares, $18 million of 8.75% first mortgage bonds due 2021, $17.3 million of subsidiary term debt and $20 million in short-term debt. The net impact of this refinancing resulted in additional interest expense from the additional long-term debt outstanding and the shift of $1.2 million from preferred dividend payments in 2001 to interest expense in 2002. Interest expense on short-term debt decreased from $1.0 million in 2001 to $0.3 million in 2002. The average daily short-term debt balance decreased from $16.7 million in 2001 to $13.2 million in 2002 and the average interest rate paid on short-term debt decreased from 5.2% in 2001 to 2.2% in 2002.

Interest expense decreased 6.0% for 2001 compared to 2000 due to decreases in the average long-term debt outstanding combined with lower interest rates on the line of credit balances and variable rate debt, offset slightly by a higher daily average line of credit borrowings outstanding. Daily average outstanding borrowings were $16.7 million for 2001 compared to $12.8 million for 2000. The average interest rate under the line of credit was 5.2% for 2001.


Consolidated income taxes

The Company's effective tax rate was 30.3% for 2002 compared with 31.5% for 2001. Although net income before taxes was $2.5 million higher in 2002 than in 2001, income taxes remained essentially the same in both years. This reflects the discontinuance of goodwill amortization in 2002. The nontaxable portion of goodwill was $1.3 million in 2001. The tax reduction on the remaining $1.2 million in pre-tax income of approximately $0.5 million reflects a reduction of tax provisions related to the settlement of IRS audits of the Company's 1997 and 1998 tax returns. The 9.4% increase in consolidated income taxes for 2001 compared to 2000 follows the $4.3 million increase in income before income taxes.

Impact of inflation

The electric utility operates under regulatory provisions that allow price changes in the cost of fuel and purchased power to be passed to most customers through automatic adjustments to its rate schedules under the cost-of-energy adjustment clause. Other increases in the cost of electric service must be recovered through timely filings for electric rate increases with the appropriate regulatory agency.

The Company's plastics, manufacturing, health services, and other business operations consist almost entirely of unregulated businesses. Increased operating costs are reflected in product or services pricing with any limitations on price increases determined by the marketplace. The impact of inflation on these segments has not been significant during the past few years because of the relatively low rates of inflation experienced in the United States. Raw material costs, labor costs and interest rates are important components of costs for companies in these segments. Any or all of these components could be impacted by inflation, with a possible adverse effect on the Company's profitability, especially in high inflation periods where raw material and energy cost increases would lead finished product prices.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES INVOLVING SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES

The Company's significant accounting policies are described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The discussion and analysis of the financial statements and results of operations are based on the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

The Company uses estimates based on the best information available in recording transactions and balances resulting from business operations. Estimates are used for such items as depreciable lives, asset impairment evaluations, tax provisions, collectability of trade accounts receivable, self insurance programs, environmental liabilities, unbilled electric revenues, unscheduled power exchanges, service contract maintenance costs, percentage-of-completion and actuarially determined benefits costs. As better information becomes available or actual amounts are known, estimates are revised. Operating results can be affected by revised estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management has discussed the application of these critical accounting policies and the development of these estimates with the audit committee of the board of directors. The following critical accounting policies affect the Company's more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.


Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations and costs

Pension and postretirement benefit liabilities and expenses for the Company's electric utility and corporate employees are determined by actuaries using assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of compensation increase and health care cost trend rates. Further discussion of our pension and postretirement benefit plans and related assumptions is included in note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

These benefits, for any individual employee, can be earned and related expenses can be recognized and a liability accrued over periods of up to forty or more years. These benefits can be paid out for up to forty or more years after an employee retires at the extreme end of the scale. Estimates of liabilities and expenses related to these benefits are among the Company's most critical accounting estimates. Although deferral and amortization of fluctuations in actuarially determined benefit obligations and expenses are provided for when actual results on a year-to-year basis deviate from long-range assumptions, compensation increases and health care cost increases or a reduction in the discount rate applied from one year to the next can significantly increase the Company's benefit expenses in the year of the change. Also, a reduction in the expected rate of return on pension plan assets in the Company's funded pension plan or realized rates of return on plan assets that are well below assumed rates of return could result in significant increases in recognized pension benefit expenses in the year of the change or for many years thereafter because actuarial losses can be amortized over the average remaining service lives of active employees.

A combination of factors has contributed to a significant increase in the Company's current estimated pension and postretirement benefits obligations liabilities and its 2003 estimated pension and postretirement benefits costs.

For the Company's pension fund, the average rate of return on assets over the past five years of 1.8% compared to an assumed rate of 9.5% combined with a reduction in the discount rate from 7.50% at year-end 2001 to 6.75% at year-end 2002 have contributed to a $46 million decrease in the pension plan's funded status, a shift from a $14 million unrecognized actuarial gain to a $33 million unrecognized actuarial loss, a shift from a $7.1 million prepaid pension asset to a $5.4 million net pension liability and a direct reduction to shareholder's equity of $7.0 million in the form of an "other comprehensive loss" from year-end 2001 to year-end 2002. These factors will all contribute to a shift from $2.6 million in pension income recorded in 2002 to a projected $1.7 million pension cost in 2003. Company pension costs for the years 2004 through 2007 assuming a 6.75% discount rate are projected to be $3.0 million in 2004, $4.6 million in 2005, $6.3 million in 2006 and $7.2 million in 2007. Subsequent increases in actual rates of return on plan assets over assumed rates or increases or decreases in the discount rate could significantly change these projected costs.

In 2002, the Company's Executive Survivor and Supplemental Retirement Plan (ES&SRP) accrued benefit liability increased by $3.8 million and shareholder's equity was reduced by $3.1 million in the form of a direct charge to "other comprehensive loss." This was the result of an increase in accumulated benefits earned and an increase in the number of plan participants, but also as a result of a reduction in the discount rate from 7.50% at December 31, 2001 to 6.75% at December 31, 2002 and actual increases in executive salaries in excess of assumed rates of increase. All these factors will contribute to an increase in the Company's ES&SRP periodic benefit cost from $1.6 million in 2002 to $2.5 million in 2003. ES&SRP costs for the years 2004 through 2007 assuming a 6.75% discount rate are projected to be $2.7 million in 2004, $2.8 million in 2005, $2.9 million in 2006 and $3.2 million in 2007.

Increases in health-care costs in excess of the assumed health-care cost trend rate for 2002 and a decrease in the discount rate from 7.5% at December 31, 2001 to 6.75% at December 31, 2002 contributed to a $10.8 million increase in the plan's projected benefit obligation and a $9.8 million increase in the plan's unrecognized actuarial loss from year-end 2001 to year-end 2002. These factors also contributed to an increase in postretirement health-care benefit costs from $3.2 million in 2002 to a


projected $4.7 million in 2003. Postretirement health-care expenses for the years 2004 through 2007 assuming a 6.75% discount rate are projected to be $4.8 million in 2004, $4.9 million in 2005, $5.0 million in 2006 and $5.3 million in 2007. Subsequent increases or decreases in the discount rate or in retiree health-care cost inflation rates could significantly change these projected costs.

Revenue recognition

In the electric business, revenue is accrued for electricity consumed but not yet billed. At the end of each month, revenue is estimated for energy consumed by customers since their last meter-reading date based on daily generation volumes, estimated customer usage by class, weather factors, line losses and applicable customer rates based on regression analysis reflecting historical consumption patterns. The estimated balance for unbilled electric revenue at the end of the year is highly sensitive to weather conditions in the month of December. The estimated December 31st balances have ranged from $10.0 million to $11.5 million over the last five years as a result of weather conditions and the timing of meter-reading dates. The estimated unbilled receivable of $10.6 million on December 31, 2002 represents approximately 5% of annual retail electric revenues. However, the incremental change in unbilled electric revenue from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002 increased by only $85,000 or 0.04% of retail electric revenue. This estimate is based on known conditions over a very short period of time, is closely associated with electric generation costs, is recalculated on a monthly basis and its incremental impact on annual revenue is generally small.

The construction companies and three manufacturing companies record operating revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis for fixed-price construction contracts. The method used to determine the progress of completion is based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs. The duration of the majority of these contracts is less than a year. The Company has recognized $45 million of revenues on jobs in progress as of December 31, 2002. There are no losses expected on jobs in progress at year-end 2002. The Company believes that the accounting estimate related to the percentage-of-completion accounting on uncompleted contracts is critical to the extent that any underestimate of total expected costs on fixed-price construction contracts could result in reduced profit margins being recognized on these contracts at the time of completion.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company encounters risks associated with sales and the collection of the associated accounts receivable. As such, the Company records a monthly provision for accounts receivable that are considered to be uncollectible. In order to calculate the appropriate monthly provision, the Company primarily utilizes a historical rate of accounts receivables written off as a percentage of total revenue. This historical rate is applied to the current revenues on a monthly basis. The historical rate is updated periodically based on events that may change the rate such as a significant increase or decrease in collection performance and timing of payments as well as the calculated total exposure in relation to the allowance. Periodically, the Company compares the identified credit risks with the allowance that has been established using historical experience and adjusts the allowance accordingly. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer's inability to meet its financial obligations, the Company records a specific allowance for bad debts to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected.

The Company believes the accounting estimate related to the allowance for doubtful accounts is critical because the underlying assumptions used for the allowance can change from period to period and could potentially cause a material impact to the income statement and working capital.

During 2002, $1.6 million of bad debts expense was incurred and the allowance for doubtful accounts was $3.8 million (4.7% of trade accounts receivable) as of December 31, 2002. General economic conditions and specific geographic concerns are major factors that may affect the adequacy of the allowance and may result in a change in the annual bad debt expense. An increase or decrease of one percentage-point in the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2002 would result in an $822,000 increase or decrease in bad debts expense.


Although an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts on the Company's accounts receivable is provided for, the allowance for doubtful accounts on the electric segment's wholesale electric sales is insignificant in proportion to annual revenues from these sales ($82 million in 2002). The electric segment has not experienced a bad debt related to wholesale electric sales due largely to stringent risk management criteria related to these sales. However, nonpayment on a single wholesale electric sale could result in a significant bad debt expense.

Depreciation expense and depreciable lives

The provisions for depreciation of electric utility property for financial reporting purposes are made on the straight-line method based on the estimated service lives (5 to 65 years) of the properties. Such provisions as a percent of the average balance of depreciable electric utility property were 3.08% in 2002 and 3.06% in both 2001 and 2000. Depreciation rates on electric utility property are subject to annual regulatory review and approval and depreciation expense is recovered through rates set by ratemaking authorities. Although the useful lives of electric utility properties are estimated, the recovery of their cost is dependent on the ratemaking process. Deregulation of the electric industry could result in changes to the estimated useful lives of electric utility property that could impact depreciation expense.

Property and equipment of nonelectric operations are carried at historical cost or at the current appraised value if acquired in a business combination accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over useful lives (3 to 40 years) of the related assets. The Company believes that the lives and methods of determining depreciation are reasonable, however, changes in economic conditions affecting the industries in which our companies operate or innovations in technology could result in a reduction of the estimated useful lives of the Company's property plant and equipment or in an impairment write-down of the carrying value of these properties.

Asset impairment

The Company is required to test for asset impairment relating to property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset might not be recoverable. The Company applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets in order to determine whether or not an asset is impaired. This standard requires an impairment analysis when indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, the standard requires that if the sum of the future expected cash flows from a company's asset, undiscounted and without interest charges, is less than the carrying value, an asset impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of the impairment is the difference between the fair value of the asset and the carrying value of the asset.

The Company believes that the accounting estimates related to an asset impairment are critical because they are highly susceptible to change from period to period reflecting changing business cycles, they require management to make assumptions about future cash flows over future years and the impact of recognizing an impairment could have a significant effect on operations. Management's assumptions about future cash flows require significant judgment because actual operating levels have fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

As of December 31, 2002, an assessment of the carrying values of the Company's long-lived assets and other intangibles indicated that these assets were not impaired.

Goodwill impairment

Beginning in 2002, goodwill is required to be evaluated annually for impairment, according to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The standard requires a two-step process be performed to analyze whether or not goodwill has been impaired. Step one is to test for potential impairment, and requires that the fair


value of the reporting unit be compared to its book value including goodwill. If the fair value is higher than the book value, no impairment is recognized. If the fair value is lower than the book value, a second step must be performed. The second step is to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any, and requires that a hypothetical purchase price allocation be done to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. This fair value is then compared to the carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value is lower than the carrying value, an impairment must be recorded.

The Company believes that accounting estimates related to goodwill impairment are critical because the underlying assumptions used for the discounted cash flow can change from period to period and could potentially cause a material impact to the income statement. Management's assumptions about inflation rates and other internal and external economic conditions, such as earnings growth rate, require significant judgment based on fluctuating rates and expected revenues. Additionally, SFAS No. 142 requires that the goodwill be analyzed for impairment on an annual basis using the assumptions that apply at the time the analysis is updated.

As of December 31, 2002, an assessment of the carrying values of the Company's goodwill indicated no impairment.

FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS

The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of future earnings. Factors affecting future earnings include, but are not limited to, the Company's diversification efforts, growth of electric revenues, the timing and scope of deregulation and open competition, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) mandated operational changes to the electricity transmission grid, impact of the investment performance of the Company's pension plan, changes in the economy, weather conditions, governmental and regulatory action, fuel and purchased power costs and environmental issues. Anticipated higher operating costs and carrying charges on increased capital investment in plant, if not offset by proportionate increases in operating revenues and other income (either by appropriate rate increases, increases in unit sales, or increases in nonelectric operations), will affect future earnings.

ELECTRIC OPERATIONS

Growth of electric revenue

Growth in electric sales will be subject to a number of factors, including the volume of sales of electricity to other utilities, the effectiveness of demand-side management programs, weather, competition, the price of alternative fuels and the rate of economic growth or decline in the Company's service area. The Company's electric business depends primarily on the use of electricity by customers in our service area. The Company's electric kwh sales to retail customers increased 2.4% in 2002, 2.9% in 2001, and 3.5% in 2000.

Factors beyond the Company's control, such as mergers and acquisitions, geographical location, transmission reservation costs, unplanned interruptions at the Company's generating plants and the effects of deregulation, could lead to greater volatility in the volume and price of sales of electricity to other utilities. Activity in the short-term energy market is subject to change based on a number of factors and it is difficult to predict the quantity of wholesale power sales or prices for wholesale power, although it appears that market conditions for wholesale power transactions will be depressed in the future because of generating unit additions in the power pool and the advent of transmission system operators mandated by the FERC.

Regulation

Rates of return earned on utility operations are subject to review by the various state commissions that have jurisdiction over the electric rates charged by the Company. These reviews may result in future revenue and income reductions when actual rates of return are deemed by regulators to be in excess of allowed rates of return.


On December 29, 2000 the North Dakota Public Service Commission (NDPSC) approved a performance-based ratemaking plan that links allowed earnings in North Dakota to seven defined performance standards in the areas of price, electric service reliability, customer satisfaction and employee safety. The plan is in place for 2001 through 2005, unless suspended or terminated by the NDPSC or the Company. The electric utility's 2002 rate of return is expected to be within the allowable range defined in the plan.

Fuel Costs

The Company has an agreement for Big Stone Plant's coal supply through December 31, 2004. The Company has been unable to negotiate a competitive delivery rate for coal to the Big Stone Plant with rail carriers. Coal is being shipped to Big Stone Plant under a tariff rate. The Company has commenced a proceeding before the Surface Transportation Board requesting the Board set a competitive rate. The Company expects the outcome to have a favorable impact on its fuel costs for the Big Stone Plant.

The Mid-Continent Area Power Pool region has experienced a slight increase in availability of excess generation and transmission capacity due to the addition of peaking capacity. While the availability of the Company's plants has been excellent, the loss of a major plant could expose the Company to higher purchased power costs. Two factors mitigate this financial risk. First, wholesale sales contracts include provisions to release the Company from its obligations in case of a plant outage; and second, the Company has cost of energy adjustment clauses that allow pass through of most of the energy costs to retail customers. However, increases in fuel costs or regional generating capacity could have a negative impact on wholesale electric sales and profit margins.

Environmental

Current regulations under the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act) are not expected to have a significant impact on future capital requirements or operating costs. However, proposed or future regulations under the Act, changes in the future coal supply market, and/or other laws and regulations could impact such requirements or costs. The Company anticipates that, under current regulatory principles, any such costs could be recovered through rates. All of the Company's electric generating plants operated within the Act's phase two standards for sulfur-dioxide and nitrogen-oxide emissions in 2002. Ongoing compliance with the phase two requirements is not expected to significantly impact operations at any of the Company's plants.

The Act called for Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) studies of the effects of emissions of listed pollutants by electric steam generating plants. The EPA has completed the studies and sent reports to Congress. The Act required that the EPA make a finding as to whether regulation of emissions of hazardous air pollutants from fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units is appropriate and necessary. On December 14, 2000 the EPA announced that it would regulate mercury emissions from electric generating units. The EPA expects to propose regulations by December 2003 and issue final rules by December 2004. Because promulgation of rules by the EPA has not been completed, it is not possible to assess whether, or to what extent, this regulation will impact the Company.

The EPA has targeted electric steam generating units as part of an enforcement initiative relative to compliance with the Act. The EPA is attempting to determine if utilities violated certain provisions of the Act by making major modifications to their facilities without installing state-of-the-art pollution controls. On January 2, 2001 the Company received a request from the EPA pursuant to Section 114(a) of the Act requiring the Company to provide certain information relative to past operation and capital construction projects at the Big Stone Plant. The Company has responded to that request and cannot, at this time, determine what, if any, actions will be taken by the EPA as a result of the Company's response.


At the request of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Company has an ongoing investigation at the Hoot Lake Plant closed ash disposal sites. The MPCA continues to monitor site activities under their Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program. In April 2001, the Company submitted a Remedial Investigation Work Plan to the MPCA describing our plans to further investigate the environmental impact of the closed portion of the Hoot Lake Plant ash disposal site. The MPCA approved the plan, with some suggested modifications and these tasks have been completed. The MPCA also asked that we eliminate a ground water seepage that was originating from one of the disposal areas. Site work was completed in early November 2001, however, seepage reappeared in a new location in the spring of 2002. We initiated additional studies to further characterize the site and that report will be submitted to the MPCA for their review and comment. The Company does not anticipate that the MPCA's review will result in actions that will have a material impact on the utility's results of operations or financial condition.

Deregulation and legislation

In December 1999, FERC issued Order No. 2000, with the goal to consolidate control of the transmission network into a new structure of independent regional grid operators. The Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO), based in Carmel, Indiana, transitioned into operational control of a broad Midwest region of transmission in February 2002. Their nondiscriminatory operation of the transmission system satisfies FERC's Order No. 2000. As the transmission provider and security coordinator for the region, MISO offers available capacity, accepts schedules, and provides settlement for transmission services. As a transmission owner within MISO, Otter Tail Power Company received $1.35 million in transmission service revenue while its load-based charge for MISO operating costs totaled $0.7 million, or $0.00017 per kwh, in 2002.

In July 2002, FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) on Standard Market Design (SMD). Its purpose is to insure standard commercial rules for the operation of competitive markets for electricity. The SMD NOPR calls for markets to be operational across the United States by the end of 2004. A final rule on the SMD is expected by June of 2003. MISO, with strong FERC encouragement, has established the end of 2003 as a target for MISO markets to be operational within its geographical area of operation.

Consolidation of adjacent North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) regional reliability councils is expected to move forward during 2003. The anticipated legal authorization to evolve the NERC, a voluntary utility effort born in the aftermath of outages in the late 1960s, into the North American Electric Reliability Organization (NAERO) is awaiting the passage of an all-encompassing energy bill. NAERO represents the creation of an independent and self-regulatory reliability organization to establish and enforce compliance with mandatory rules for the reliable operation of the transmission system within the United States under the oversight of FERC.

The United States Congress ended its 2002 legislative session without taking action on electric industry restructuring legislation. The Congress did consider a broad energy bill, but failed to pass it prior to the November elections. There was no legislative action regarding electric retail choice in any of the states the Company serves and no major electricity legislation is expected in the 2003 legislative sessions in those states. The Company does not expect retail competition to come to the states of Minnesota, North Dakota or South Dakota in the foreseeable future.

Competition in the electric industry

As the electric industry evolves and becomes more competitive, the Company believes it is well positioned to be successful. A comparison of the Company's electric retail rates to the rates of other investor-owned utilities, cooperatives, and municipals in the states the Company serves indicates that its rates are competitive. In addition, the Company would attempt more flexible pricing strategies under an open, competitive environment.


NONELECTRIC OPERATIONS

In 2002, approximately 31% of the Company's net income was contributed by nonelectric operations. The Company plans to make additional acquisitions. The following guidelines are used when considering acquisitions: emerging or middle market company; proven entrepreneurial management team that will remain after the acquisition; products and services intended for commercial rather than retail consumer use; the ability to provide immediate earnings and future growth potential; and 100% ownership. The Company intends to grow earnings as a long-term owner of its operating companies. The Company also assesses the performance of its operating companies' return on capital and will consider divesting under-performing operating companies. Continuing growth from nonelectric operations could result in earnings, cash flow and stock price volatility.

While the Company cannot predict the success of our current nonelectric businesses, we believe opportunities exist for growth in these business segments. Factors that could affect the results of our nonelectric businesses include, but are not limited to, the following: fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials and the ability to maintain favorable supplier arrangements and relationships; competitive products and pricing pressures and the ability to gain or maintain market share in trade areas; general economic conditions; the impact of government regulation; effectiveness of advertising, marketing, and promotional programs; impairment of goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of nonelectric businesses; adverse weather conditions; and competition in the transportation industry. The failure of Congress to pass a broad energy bill in 2003 could have an unfavorable impact on the Company's operations that manufacture towers for the wind energy industry.

KEY ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, on January 1, 2001, which requires all derivative instruments be reported on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The Company has determined that certain electric energy contracts meet the criteria of a derivative under SFAS No. 133 but qualify for the normal purchase and normal sales exception and are not subject to mark-to-market accounting treatment. SFAS No. 133 did not have a material effect on the Company's 2001 or 2002 consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In October 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 02-3, Issues Related to Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities. Any contracts within the scope of SFAS No. 133 that are trading or held for trading and are settled physically should be reported on a net basis. Any contracts within the scope of SFAS No. 133 that are not considered trading and are settled physically should be reported on a gross basis. As of December 31, 2002, none of the electric utility's completed or open energy-only contracts were determined to be trading or held for trading purposes.

The FASB has issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO), which provides accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. Retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets included within the scope of SFAS No. 143 are those for which there is a legal obligation to settle under existing or enacted law, statute, written or oral contract or by legal constructions under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Adoption of SFAS No. 143 will change the accounting for ARO costs of the utility's generating plants as well as certain other long-lived assets. Currently, estimated net salvage amounts are part of depreciation expense accruals collected in the utility's rates and reported in accumulated depreciation. SFAS No. 143 requires the present value of the future decommissioning cost to be recognized as a liability on the balance sheet with an offsetting amount being added to the capitalized cost of the related long-lived asset. The liability will be accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost will be depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. The FERC issued a proposed rulemaking on Accounting, Financial Reporting, and Rate Filing Requirements for Asset Retirement Obligations on October 30, 2002.


The Company is in the process of evaluating what assets may have associated retirement costs as defined by SFAS No. 143, and what the prescribed accounting treatment will be under FERC rules. Preliminary calculations indicate that estimated costs of current legal obligations associated with asset retirement are already included in existing accumulated depreciation. The estimated amount added to the generating plant assets would be under $0.7 million. The estimated future obligation under SFAS No. 143 is under $4.3 million, primarily for steam generating plants, and the estimated current liability at the end of 2002 would be near $2.2 million. The $1.5 million difference between the increase in plant assets and the present value of the future ARO obligation represents the cumulative effect of amounts that would have been accreted to the liability from the time the generating assets were first placed in service through December 31, 2002. The Company expects regulatory rules to be adopted that will allow the cumulative effect of the accretion expense on net income resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 143 to be offset by a credit to income and a charge to the accumulated reserve for depreciation account or to a proposed regulatory asset account. Through 2002, the Company has accrued $14.4 million in its depreciation reserve accounts for all legal and other expected obligations at retirement of their steam generating plants. Since the Company is already recovering these estimated legal obligations and they are already recognized as recoverable for rate regulation, the Company does not expect any impact on earnings as a result of adopting SFAS No. 143.

The FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets in October 2001. SFAS No. 144 replaces SFAS No.121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. This statement develops one accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale and also broadens the reporting of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that can be distinguished from the rest of the entity in a disposal transaction. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted the accounting model for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets starting January 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation--Transition and Disclosure. This Statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Certain amendments to SFAS No. 123 of this Statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company currently follows the accounting provisions of Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for stock-based compensation and provides the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

At December 31, 2002 the Company had limited exposure to market risk associated with interest rates and commodity prices and no exposure to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

The majority of the Company's long-term debt has fixed interest rates. The interest on variable rate long-term debt is reset on a periodic basis reflecting current market conditions. The Company manages its interest rate risk through the issuance of fixed-rate debt with varying maturities, through economic refunding of debt through optional refundings, limiting the amount of variable interest rate debt, and the utilization of short-term borrowings to allow flexibility in the timing and


placement of long-term debt. As of December 31, 2002 the Company had $15.5 million of long-term debt subject to variable interest rates. Assuming no change in the Company's financial structure, if variable interest rates were to average 1 percentage-point higher or lower than the average variable rate on December 31, 2002, interest expense and pre-tax earnings would change by approximately $155,000.

The Company has not used interest rate swaps to manage net exposure to interest rate changes related to the Company's portfolio of borrowings. The Company maintains a ratio of fixed rate debt to total debt within a certain range. It is the Company's policy to enter into interest rate transactions and other financial instruments only to the extent considered necessary to meet its stated objectives. The Company does not enter into transactions for speculative or trading purposes.

The electric utility's retail portion of fuel and purchased power costs are subject to cost-of-energy adjustment clauses that mitigate the commodity price risk by allowing a pass through of most of the increase or decrease in energy costs to retail customers. In addition, the electric utility participates in an active wholesale power market providing access to energy resources that may serve to mitigate price risk. The Company has in place an energy risk management policy with a goal to manage, through the use of defined risk management practices, price risk and credit risk associated with wholesale power purchases and sales.

The Company's energy services subsidiary markets natural gas to approximately 150 retail customers. Some of these customers are served under fixed-price contracts. There is price risk associated with a limited number of fixed-price contracts since the corresponding cost of natural gas is not immediately locked in. This price risk is not considered material to the Company.

The plastics companies are exposed to market risk related to changes in commodity prices for PVC resins, the raw material used to manufacture PVC pipe. The PVC pipe industry is highly sensitive to commodity raw material pricing volatility. Historically, when resin prices are rising or stable, margins and sales volume have been higher and when resin prices are falling, sales volumes and margins have been lower. Gross margins also decline when the supply of PVC pipe increases faster than demand. Due to the commodity nature of PVC resin and the dynamic supply and demand factors worldwide, it is very difficult to predict gross margin percentages or to assume that historical trends will continue.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company makes the following statements.

The information in this annual report includes forward-looking statements. Important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements are set forth above under "Critical accounting policies involving significant estimates" and "Factors affecting future earnings." Other risks and uncertainties may be presented from time to time in the Company's future Securities and Exchange Commission filings.


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Otter Tail Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2002, and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, common shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2002, and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 29, 2003


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, DECEMBER 31                                   2002           2001
----------------------------------------                                   ----           ----
                                                                              (in thousands)
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
     Cash and cash equivalents                                          $    9,937      $ 11,378
     Accounts receivable:
         Trade (less allowance for doubtful accounts of
             $3,833,000 for 2002 and $1,109,000 for 2001)                   81,670        64,215
         Other                                                               1,466         5,047
     Inventories                                                            44,154        39,301
     Deferred income taxes                                                   4,487         4,020
     Accrued utility revenues                                               11,633        11,055
     Other                                                                  10,866         8,878
                                                                        ----------      --------
               Total current assets                                        164,213       143,894
                                                                        ----------      --------

INVESTMENTS                                                                 18,439        18,009
GOODWILL--NET                                                               64,557        48,221
INTANGIBLES--NET                                                             5,592         1,584
OTHER ASSETS                                                                17,696        15,687

DEFERRED DEBITS
     Unamortized debt expense and reacquisition premiums                     8,895         5,646
     Regulatory assets                                                      10,238         5,117
     Other                                                                   1,220         1,406
                                                                        ----------      --------
               Total deferred debits                                        20,353        12,169
                                                                        ----------      --------
PLANT
     Electric plant in service                                             835,382       810,470
     Nonelectric operations                                                178,656       145,712
                                                                        ----------      --------
          Total                                                          1,014,038       956,182
     Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                        467,759       441,863
                                                                        ----------      --------
          Plant - net of accumulated depreciation and amortization         546,279       514,319
     Construction work in progress                                          41,607        28,658
                                                                        ----------      --------
          Net plant                                                        587,886       542,977
                                                                        ----------      --------

          TOTAL                                                         $  878,736      $782,541
                                                                        ==========      ========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, DECEMBER 31                                             2002           2001
----------------------------------------                                             ----           ----
                                                                                       (in thousands)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
     Short-term debt                                                              $  30,000       $      --
     Sinking fund requirements and current maturities of long-term debt               7,690          28,946
     Accounts payable                                                                52,430          46,871
     Accrued salaries and wages                                                      18,194          17,397
     Accrued federal and state income taxes                                              --           1,634
     Other accrued taxes                                                             10,150           9,854
     Other accrued liabilities                                                        5,760           6,090
                                                                                  ---------       ---------
               Total current liabilities                                            124,224         110,792
                                                                                  ---------       ---------

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES                                                               43,821          32,981
                                                                                  ---------       ---------

COMMITMENTS (NOTE 7)

DEFERRED CREDITS
     Deferred income taxes                                                           94,147          85,591
     Deferred investment tax credit                                                  12,782          13,935
     Regulatory liabilities                                                           9,133           9,914
     Other                                                                            7,435           7,160
                                                                                  ---------       ---------
               Total deferred credits                                               123,497         116,600
                                                                                  ---------       ---------

CAPITALIZATION (PAGE 37)
     Long-term debt, net of sinking fund and current maturities                     258,229         227,360

     Cumulative preferred shares                                                     15,500          15,500

     Common shares, par value $5 per share -- authorized, 50,000,000 shares;
          outstanding, 2002 -- 25,592,160 shares; 2001 -- 24,653,490 shares         127,961         123,267
     Premium on common shares                                                        24,135           1,526
     Unearned compensation                                                           (1,946)           (151)
     Retained earnings                                                              175,304         156,641
     Accumulated other comprehensive loss                                           (11,989)         (1,975)
                                                                                  ---------       ---------
         Total common equity                                                        313,465         279,308

             Total capitalization                                                   587,194         522,168
                                                                                  ---------       ---------

                 TOTAL                                                            $ 878,736       $ 782,541
                                                                                  =========       =========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31                              2002            2001            2000
-------------------------------                              ----            ----            ----
                                                           (in thousands, except per-share amounts)
OPERATING REVENUES
     Electric                                              $ 307,403       $ 307,684       $262,280
     Plastics                                                 82,931          63,216         82,667
     Manufacturing                                           142,390         123,436         97,506
     Health services                                          93,420          79,129         66,319
     Other business operations                                83,972          80,667         78,159
                                                           ---------       ---------       --------
          Total operating revenues                           710,116         654,132        586,931

OPERATING EXPENSES
     Production fuel                                          44,122          41,776         38,546
     Purchased power                                          94,694          99,491         66,121
     Electric operation and maintenance expenses              80,534          75,531         74,591
     Cost of goods sold                                      286,253         249,789        229,056
     Other nonelectric expenses                               70,495          58,497         53,831
     Depreciation and amortization                            42,613          42,100         40,562
     Property taxes                                            9,423           9,464          9,976
                                                           ---------       ---------       --------
          Total operating expenses                           628,134         576,648        512,683

OPERATING INCOME
     Electric                                                 53,720          57,150         49,268
     Plastics                                                 11,136          (1,391)         8,745
     Manufacturing                                             9,771          12,175          6,945
     Health services                                           8,370           6,862          5,729
     Other business operations                                (1,015)          2,688          3,561
                                                           ---------       ---------       --------
          Total operating income                              81,982          77,484         74,248

OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS -- NET                             2,057           2,193          2,154
INTEREST CHARGES                                              17,850          15,991         17,005
                                                           ---------       ---------       --------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES                                    66,189          63,686         59,397
INCOME TAXES                                                  20,061          20,083         18,355
                                                           ---------       ---------       --------
NET INCOME                                                    46,128          43,603         41,042
PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS                                  736           1,993          1,879
                                                           ---------       ---------       --------
EARNINGS AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHARES                       $  45,392       $  41,610       $ 39,163
                                                           =========       =========       ========

AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC           25,176          24,600         24,572
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED         25,397          24,832         24,649

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                                   $    1.80       $    1.69       $   1.59
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                                 $    1.79       $    1.68       $   1.59

DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE                                 $    1.06       $    1.04       $   1.02

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                          ACCUMULATED
                                          COMMON       PAR VALUE,  PREMIUM ON                                 OTHER
                                          SHARES         COMMON      COMMON      UNEARNED     RETAINED    COMPREHENSIVE    TOTAL
                                        OUTSTANDING      SHARES      SHARES    COMPENSATION   EARNINGS    INCOME/(LOSS)   EQUITY
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           (in thousands, except common shares outstanding)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1999               24,571,410    $  122,857  $       --   $     (301)  $ 126,210     $       --    $ 248,766

  Common stock issuances                      2,878            14          50                                                   64
  Amortization of unearned
  compensation - stock options                                                          75                                      75
  Comprehensive income:
       Net income                                                                               41,042                      41,042
       Minimum liability
         adjustment                                                                                              (220)        (220)
                                                                                                                         ---------
          Total comprehensive
          income                                                                                                            40,822
  Purchase stock for employee
    purchase plan on open market                                                                  (250)                       (250)
  Cumulative preferred dividends                                                                (1,878)                     (1,878)
  Common dividends                                                                             (24,328)                    (24,328)
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2000               24,574,288       122,871          50         (226)    140,796           (220)     263,271

  Common stock issuances                     79,202           396       1,187                                                1,583
  Amortization of unearned
    compensation - stock options                                                        75                                      75
  Comprehensive income:
       Net income                                                                               43,603                      43,603
       Minimum liability adjustment                                                                            (1,755)      (1,755)
                                                                                                                         ---------
          Total comprehensive income                                                                                        41,848
  Tax benefit for exercise of stock
    options                                                               302                                                  302
  Remove capital stock expense $6.35
    preferred shares                                                      246                     (246)                         --
  Purchase stock for employee
    purchase plan on open market                                         (259)                    (168)                       (427)
  Cumulative preferred dividends                                                                (2,088)                     (2,088)
  Common dividends                                                                             (25,256)                    (25,256)
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2001               24,653,490       123,267       1,526         (151)    156,641         (1,975)     279,308

  Common stock issuances                    938,670         4,694      22,094       (2,674)                                 24,114
  Amortization of unearned
    compensation - stock options                                                       879                                     879
  Comprehensive income:
       Net income                                                                               46,128                      46,128
       Minimum liability adjustment                                                                           (10,014)     (10,014)
                                                                                                                         ---------
          Total comprehensive income                                                                                        36,114
  Tax benefit for exercise of
    stock options                                                         720                                                  720
  Purchase stock for employee purchase
    plan on open market                                                  (205)                                                (205)
  Cumulative preferred dividends                                                                  (736)                       (736)
  Common dividends                                                                             (26,729)                    (26,729)
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2002               25,592,160    $  127,961  $   24,135   $   (1,946)  $ 175,304     $  (11,989)   $ 313,465
                                         =========================================================================================

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31                                                                 2002           2001           2000
-------------------------------                                                                 ----           ----           ----
                                                                                                         (in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
     Net income                                                                               $ 46,128      $  43,603      $ 41,042
     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
     by operating activities:
          Depreciation and amortization                                                         42,613         42,100        40,562
          Deferred investment tax credit - net                                                  (1,153)        (1,177)       (1,183)
          Deferred income taxes                                                                  2,669         (1,441)       (4,655)
          Change in deferred debits and other assets                                            (5,178)        (8,434)       (3,346)
          Change in noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits                                  1,049          2,484         4,263
          Allowance for equity (other) funds used during construction                           (1,742)          (963)         (341)
          Other - net                                                                            1,399            (81)          728
      Cash provided by (used for) current assets and current liabilities:
          Change in receivables, materials and supplies                                         (4,192)         4,880       (20,781)
          Change in other current assets                                                        (2,512)          (432)          537
          Change in payables and other current liabilities                                       2,288           (581)        9,904
          Change in interest and income taxes payable                                           (4,572)        (2,429)       (4,969)
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------
               NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                        76,797         77,529        61,761
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
     Capital expenditures                                                                      (75,533)       (53,596)      (46,273)
     Proceeds from disposal of noncurrent assets                                                 2,462          3,298         1,709
     Acquisitions, net of cash acquired                                                         (6,591)        (8,948)      (34,194)
     Sale (purchase) of other investments                                                            5         (1,884)          (86)
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------
               NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                           (79,657)       (61,130)      (78,844)
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------

 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
     Net borrowings under line of credit                                                        25,507             --           (50)
     Proceeds from employee stock plans                                                          3,091          1,347            14
     Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt                                                   65,124        121,146        44,814
     Payments for retirement of long-term debt                                                 (62,161)       (81,549)      (24,889)
     Payments for debt issuance expenses                                                        (2,677)        (1,880)           --
     Redemption of preferred stock                                                                  --        (18,000)           --
     Dividends paid and other distributions                                                    (27,465)       (27,344)      (26,455)
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------
               NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES                               1,419         (6,280)       (6,566)
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                                         (1,441)        10,119       (23,649)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR                                                  11,378          1,259        24,908
                                                                                              --------      ---------      --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR                                                      $  9,937      $  11,378      $  1,259
                                                                                              ========      =========      ========

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
     Cash paid during the year for:
          Interest (net of amount capitalized)                                                $ 16,831      $  16,313      $ 16,075
          Income taxes                                                                        $ 22,835      $  23,575      $ 28,510

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION, DECEMBER 31                                                          2002          2001
------------------------------------------------------                                                          ----          ----
                                                                                                                  (in thousands)
LONG-TERM DEBT
     First mortgage bond series:
        7.25%, retired August 1, 2002                                                                          $     --     $ 18,200
        8.25%, retired October 31, 2002                                                                              --       27,300
                                                                                                               --------     --------
            Total first mortgage bond series                                                                         --       45,500
     Senior debentures 6.375%, due December 1, 2007                                                              50,000       50,000
     Senior notes 6.63%, due December 1, 2011                                                                    90,000       90,000
     Insured senior notes 5.625%, due October 1, 2017                                                            40,000           --
     Senior notes 6.80%, due October 1, 2032                                                                     25,000           --
     Industrial development refunding revenue bonds 5.00% retired December 2, 2002                                   --        3,010
     Pollution control refunding revenue bonds variable 1.8% at December 31, 2002, due December 1, 2012          10,400       10,400
     Grant County, South Dakota pollution control refunding revenue bonds 4.65%, due September 1, 2017            5,185        5,185
     Mercer County, North Dakota pollution control refunding revenue bonds 4.85%, due September 1, 2022          20,790       20,790
     Obligations of Varistar Corporation:
          8.15% five-year term note, due October 31, 2005                                                         3,531        5,280
          7.80% ten-year term note, due October 31, 2007                                                          6,712        9,771
          Variable 3.07% at December 31, 2002, due July 3, 2007                                                   3,634        4,479
          Various up to 12.67% at December 31, 2002                                                              11,022       11,571
     Obligations of Otter Tail Energy Services Company 8.75% ten-year term note, retired February 2002               --          892
     Other                                                                                                           --            5
                                                                                                               --------     --------
               Total                                                                                            266,274      256,883
Less:
     Current maturities                                                                                           7,690       28,646
     Sinking fund requirement                                                                                        --          300
     Unamortized debt discount                                                                                      355          577
                                                                                                               --------     --------
                    Total long-term debt                                                                        258,229      227,360
                                                                                                               --------     --------

CUMULATIVE PREFERRED SHARES -- without par value (stated and
     liquidating value $100 a share) -- authorized 1,500,000 shares;
     Series outstanding:
         $3.60, 60,000 shares                                                                                     6,000        6,000
         $4.40, 25,000 shares                                                                                     2,500        2,500
         $4.65, 30,000 shares                                                                                     3,000        3,000
         $6.75, 40,000 shares                                                                                     4,000        4,000
                                                                                                               --------     --------
             Total preferred                                                                                     15,500       15,500
                                                                                                               --------     --------

CUMULATIVE PREFERENCE SHARES -- without par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; outstanding: none

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                                                                               313,465      279,308
                                                                                                               --------     --------

TOTAL CAPITALIZATION                                                                                           $587,194     $522,168
                                                                                                               ========     ========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


Otter Tail Corporation
Notes to consolidated financial statements For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

1. Summary of significant accounting policies

Principles of consolidation--The consolidated financial statements of Otter Tail Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the Company) include the accounts of the following segments: electric, plastics, manufacturing, health services and other business operations. The electric segment is regulated while the other segments are not regulated. See note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further descriptions of the Company's business segments. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation except profits on sales to the regulated electric utility company from nonregulated affiliates, which is in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation. These amounts are not material.

Regulation and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71--As a regulated entity, the Company and the electric utility account for the financial effects of regulation in accordance with SFAS No. 71. This statement allows for the recording of a regulatory asset or liability for costs that will be collected or refunded through the ratemaking process in the future. In accordance with regulatory treatment, the Company defers utility debt redemption premiums and amortizes such costs over the original life of the reacquired bonds. See note 4 for further discussion.

The Company's regulated business is subject to various state and federal agency regulations. The accounting policies followed by this business is subject to the Uniform System of Accounts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These accounting policies differ in some respects from those used by the Company's nonregulated businesses.

Plant, retirements and depreciation--Utility plant is stated at original cost. The cost of additions includes contracted work, direct labor and materials, allocable overheads and allowance for funds used during construction (AFC). AFC, a noncash item, is included in utility construction work in progress. The amount of AFC capitalized was $2,636,000 for 2002, $1,342,000 for 2001 and $471,000 for 2000. The cost of depreciable units of property retired plus removal costs less salvage is charged to the accumulated provision for depreciation. Maintenance, repairs and replacement of minor items of property are charged to operating expenses. The provisions for utility depreciation for financial reporting purposes are made on the straight-line method based on the estimated service lives of the properties. Such provisions as a percent of the average balance of depreciable electric utility property were 3.08% in 2002 and 3.06% in both 2001 and 2000. Gains or losses on asset dispositions are taken to the accumulated provision for depreciation reserve and impact current and future depreciation rates.

Property and equipment of nonelectric operations are carried at historical cost or at the then current appraised value if acquired in a business combination accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over useful lives (3 to 40 years) of the related assets. Replacement and major improvements are capitalized; maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Gains or losses on asset dispositions are included in the determination of net income.

Jointly owned plants--The consolidated financial statements include the Company's 53.9% (Big Stone Plant) and 35% (Coyote Station) ownership interests in the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses of Big Stone Plant and Coyote Station. Amounts at December 31, 2002 and 2001 included in electric plant in service for Big Stone were $113,731,000 and $112,898,000, respectively, and the accumulated depreciation was $74,533,000 and $71,585,000, respectively. Amounts at December 31, 2002 and 2001 included in electric plant in service for Coyote were $146,739,000 and $146,566,000, respectively, and the accumulated depreciation was $77,855,000 and $74,057,000, respectively. The Company's share of direct revenue and expenses of the jointly owned plants is included in operating revenue and expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.


Recoverability of long-lived assets--The Company reviews its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company determines potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the assets with net cash flows expected to be provided by operating activities of the business or related assets. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying values, the Company would determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized. An impairment loss would be quantified by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset where fair value is based on the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.

Income taxes--Comprehensive interperiod income tax allocation is used for substantially all book and tax temporary differences. Deferred income taxes arise for all temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes are recorded using the tax rates scheduled by tax law to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. The Company amortizes the investment tax credit over the estimated lives of the related property.

Revenue recognition--Due to the diverse business operations of the Company, revenue recognition depends on the product produced and sold. The Company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete, evidenced by an agreement with the customer, there has been delivery and acceptance, and the price is fixed or determinable. In cases where significant obligations remain after delivery, revenue is deferred until such obligations are fulfilled. Provisions for sale returns and warranty costs are recorded at the time of the sale based on historical information and current trends.

For those operating businesses recognizing revenue when shipped, the operating businesses have no further obligation to provide services related to such product. The shipping terms used in these instances are FOB shipping point.

Electric customers' meters are read and bills are rendered monthly. Revenue is accrued for electricity consumed but not yet billed. Rate schedules applicable to substantially all customers include a cost-of-energy adjustment clause--under which the rates are adjusted to reflect changes in average cost of fuels and purchased power--and a surcharge for recovery of conservation-related expenses. Revenue is accrued for fuel and purchased power costs incurred in excess of amounts recovered in base rates but not yet billed through the cost-of-energy adjustment clause.

Revenues on wholesale electricity sales are recognized when energy is delivered. The majority of revenue is the result of bilateral agreements with individual counter-parties.

Plastics operating revenues are recorded when the product is shipped.

Health services operating revenues on major equipment and installation contracts are recorded when the equipment is delivered. Amounts received in advance under customer service contracts are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period. Revenues generated in the mobile imaging operations are recorded on a fee-per-scan basis.

Manufacturing operating revenues are recorded when products are shipped and on a percentage-of-completion basis for construction type contracts.

Other business operations operating revenues are recorded when services are rendered or products are shipped. In the case of construction contracts, the percentage-of-completion method is used.


Some of the operating businesses enter into fixed-price construction contracts. Revenues under these contracts are recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis. The method used to determine the progress of completion is based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs. If a loss is indicated at a point in time during a contract, a projected loss for the entire contract is estimated and recognized. The following summarizes costs incurred and billings on uncompleted contracts:

                                                               December 31,      December 31,
(in thousands)                                                    2002               2001
--------------                                                 ------------      ------------
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts                          $ 42,768          $ 27,808
Less billings to date                                             (44,572)          (38,808)
Plus earnings recognized                                            6,340             5,672
                                                                 --------          --------
                                                                 $  4,536          $ (5,328)
                                                                 ========          ========

The following costs incurred and billings are included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet under Other current assets and Accounts payable:

                                                                   December 31,     December 31,
(in thousands)                                                         2002             2001
--------------                                                     ------------     ------------
Costs in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts                 $ 5,529         $ 1,951
Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts                    (993)         (7,279)
                                                                     -------         -------
                                                                     $ 4,536         $(5,328)
                                                                     =======         =======

Pre-production costs--The Company incurs costs related to the design and development of molds, dies and tools as part of the manufacturing process. The Company accounts for these costs under Emerging Issues Task Force Statement (EITF) 99-5, Accounting for Pre-production Costs Related to Long-Term Supply Arrangements. The Company capitalizes the costs related to the design and development of molds, dies and tools used to produce products under a long-term supply arrangement, some of which are owned by the Company. The balance of pre-production costs deferred on the balance sheet was $1,621,000 as of December 31, 2002 and $1,595,000 as of December 31, 2001.

Shipping and handling costs--The Company includes revenues received for shipping and handling in operating revenues. Expenses paid for shipping and handling are recorded as part of cost of goods sold.

Stock-based compensation--As described in note 5, the Company has elected to follow the accounting provisions of Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for stock-based compensation and to furnish the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.


Had compensation costs for the stock options issued been determined based on estimated fair value at the award dates, as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income for 2000 through 2002 would have decreased as presented in the table below. This may not be representative of the pro forma effects for future years if additional options are granted.

                                                         2002           2001           2000
                                                      ---------      ---------      ---------
                                                                  (in thousands)
Net income
   As reported                                        $  46,128      $  43,603      $  41,042
      Total stock-based employee compensation
         expense determined under fair value
         based method for all awards net of
         related tax effects                             (1,038)          (833)          (345)
                                                      ---------      ---------      ---------
   Pro forma                                          $  45,090      $  42,770      $  40,697

Basic earnings per share
   As reported                                        $    1.80      $    1.69      $    1.59
   Pro forma                                          $    1.76      $    1.66      $    1.58
Diluted earnings per share
   As reported                                        $    1.79      $    1.68      $    1.59
   Pro forma                                          $    1.75      $    1.64      $    1.57

Use of estimates--The Company uses estimates based on the best information available in recording transactions and balances resulting from business operations. Estimates are used for such items as depreciable lives, asset impairment evaluations, tax provisions, collectability of trade accounts receivable, self insurance programs, environmental liabilities, unbilled electric revenues, unscheduled power exchanges, service contract maintenance costs, percentage-of-completion and actuarially determined benefit costs. As better information becomes available (or actual amounts are known), the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.

Reclassifications--Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to 2002 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income, shareholders' equity or cash flows provided from operations. In addition, during 2001 the Company completed two acquisitions using the pooling-of-interests accounting method. Consolidated financial statements for 2000 were restated in 2001 to reflect these acquisitions.

Cash equivalents--The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

Investments--At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had investments of $5,359,000 and $6,108,000, respectively, in limited partnerships that invest in tax-credit qualifying affordable housing projects. These investments provided the Company with tax credits of $1,418,000 in both 2002 and 2001 and $1,414,000 in 2000. The balance of investments at December 31, 2002, consists of $6,135,000 in additional investments accounted for under the equity method and $6,945,000 in other investments accounted for under the cost method, with $1,303,000 related to participation in economic development loan pools. The balance of investments at December 31, 2001, consists of $6,058,000 in additional investments accounted for under the equity method and $5,843,000 in other investments accounted for under the cost method, with $1,186,000 related to participation in economic development loan pools. See further discussion under note 10.


Inventories--The electric operation inventories are reported at average cost. The plastics, health services, manufacturing and other business operation inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Inventories consist of the following:

                                    December 31,      December 31,
(in thousands)                          2002              2001
--------------                      ------------      ------------
Finished goods                        $15,795           $12,644
Work in process                         1,438             1,732
Raw material, fuel and supplies        26,921            24,925
    Total inventories                 $44,154           $39,301

Short-term debt--There was $30,000,000 in short-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and no short-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2001. The average interest rate paid on short-term debt during 2002 and 2001 was 2.2% and 5.2%, respectively.

Intangible assets--SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will be tested for impairment on an annual basis. Intangible assets with finite useful lives will be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002.

The Company determined that as of January 1, 2002 goodwill was not impaired and therefore no write-off was necessary. If goodwill had not been amortized in 2001 and 2000, net income would have increased by $2.45 million in 2001 and $2.35 million in 2000. The following table presents the effects of not amortizing goodwill on reported net income and basic and diluted earnings per share.

(in thousands, except per share amounts)             2002       2001        2000
----------------------------------------             ----       ----        ----
Net income:
   Reported net income                             $46,128     $43,603     $41,042
   Add back: goodwill amortization, net of tax          --       2,449       2,353
                                                   -------     -------     -------
   Adjusted net income                             $46,128     $46,052     $43,395
                                                   =======     =======     =======
Basic earnings per share:
   Reported basic earnings per share               $  1.80     $  1.69     $  1.59
   Add back: goodwill amortization, net of tax          --        0.10        0.10
                                                   -------     -------     -------
   Adjusted basic earnings per share               $  1.80     $  1.79     $  1.69
                                                   =======     =======     =======
Diluted earnings per share:
   Reported diluted earnings per share             $  1.79     $  1.68     $  1.59
   Add back: goodwill amortization, net of tax          --        0.09        0.09
                                                   -------     -------     -------
   Adjusted diluted earnings per share             $  1.79     $  1.77     $  1.68
                                                   =======     =======     =======


The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment are as follows:

                                                                Adjustment to
                                                Balance              goodwill        Goodwill          Balance
                                           December 31,           acquired in        acquired     December 31,
(in thousands)                                     2001                  2001         in 2002             2002
--------------                             ------------         -------------        --------     ------------
Plastics                                        $19,302                $   --         $    --          $19,302
Manufacturing                                     1,627                    40           6,942            8,609
Health services                                  13,311                 1,885           7,213           22,409
Other business operations                        13,981                     6             250           14,237
                                                -------                ------         -------          -------
    Total                                       $48,221                $1,931         $14,405          $64,557
                                                =======                ======         =======          =======

Intangible assets with finite lives are being amortized over average lives that vary from one to five years. The amortization expense for these intangible assets was $535,000 for 2002, $414,000 for 2001 and $357,000 for 2000. The estimated annual amortization expense for these intangible assets for the next five years is: $525,000 for 2003, $486,000 for 2004, $366,000 for 2005, $219,000 for 2006 and $107,000 for 2007.

Total other intangibles as of December 31 are as follows:

                                                         Gross                              Net
                                                        carrying       Accumulated        carrying
2002 (in thousands)                                      amount        amortization        amount
-------------------                                     ---------      ------------       --------
Amortized intangible assets:
  Covenants not to compete                               $1,920           $1,143           $  777
  Other intangible assets including contracts             2,079              884            1,195
                                                         ------           ------           ------
      Total                                              $3,999           $2,027           $1,972
                                                         ======           ======           ======
Non-amortized intangible assets:
   Brandname                                             $3,620           $   --           $3,620
                                                         ======           ======           ======

2001 (in thousands)
-------------------
Amortized intangible assets:
  Covenants not to compete                               $1,575           $  933           $  642
  Other intangible assets including contracts             1,511              569              942
                                                         ------           ------           ------
      Total                                              $3,086           $1,502           $1,584
                                                         ======           ======           ======

The Company periodically evaluates the recovery of intangible assets based on an analysis of undiscounted future cash flows. As a result of changing market conditions during 2000, the Company completed an evaluation of the recoverability of the assets of a subsidiary acquired by Otter Tail Energy Services in 1998. As a result of the evaluation it was determined that $800,000 of goodwill was impaired and was charged to amortization expense during 2000. As a result of the writedown, the remaining goodwill related to the acquisition is $1.0 million as of December 31, 2002.

Adoption of new accounting pronouncements--The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, on January 1, 2001, which requires all derivative instruments be reported on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The Company has determined that certain electric energy contracts meet the criteria of a derivative under SFAS No. 133 but qualify for the normal purchase and normal sales exception and are not subject to mark-to-market accounting treatment. SFAS No. 133 did not have a material effect on the Company's 2001 or 2002 consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.


In October 2002, the EITF of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 02-3, Issues Related to Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities. Any contracts within the scope of SFAS No. 133 that are trading or held for trading and are settled physically should be reported on a net basis. Any contracts within the scope of SFAS No. 133 that are not considered trading and are settled physically should be reported on a gross basis. As of December 31, 2002, none of the electric utility's completed or open energy-only contracts were determined to be trading or held for trading purposes.

The FASB has issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO), which provides accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. Retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets included within the scope of SFAS No. 143 are those for which there is a legal obligation to settle under existing or enacted law, statute, written or oral contract or by legal constructions under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Adoption of SFAS No. 143 will change the accounting for ARO costs of the utility's generating plants as well as certain other long-lived assets. Currently, estimated net salvage amounts are part of depreciation expense accruals collected in the utility's rates and reported in accumulated depreciation. SFAS No. 143 requires the present value of the future decommissioning cost to be recognized as a liability on the balance sheet with an offsetting amount being added to the capitalized cost of the related long-lived asset. The liability will be accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost will be depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. The FERC issued a proposed rulemaking on Accounting, Financial Reporting, and Rate Filing Requirements for Asset Retirement Obligations on October 30, 2002.

The Company is in the process of evaluating what assets may have associated retirement costs as defined by SFAS No. 143, and what the prescribed accounting treatment will be under FERC rules. Preliminary calculations indicate that estimated costs of current legal obligations associated with asset retirement are already included in existing accumulated depreciation. The estimated amount added to the generating plant assets would be under $0.7 million. The estimated future obligation under SFAS No. 143 is under $4.3 million, primarily for steam generating plants, and the estimated current liability at the end of 2002 would be near $2.2 million. The $1.5 million difference between the increase in plant assets and the present value of the future ARO obligation represents the cumulative effect of amounts that would have been accreted to the liability from the time the generating assets were first placed in service through December 31, 2002. The Company expects regulatory rules to be adopted that will allow the cumulative effect of the accretion expense on net income resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 143 to be offset by a credit to income and a charge to the accumulated reserve for depreciation account or to a proposed regulatory asset account. Through 2002, the Company has accrued $14.4 million in its depreciation reserve accounts for all legal and other expected obligations at retirement of their steam generating plants. Since the Company is already recovering these estimated legal obligations and they are already recognized as recoverable for rate regulation, the Company does not expect any impact on earnings as a result of adopting SFAS No. 143.

The FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, in October 2001. SFAS No. 144 replaces SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. This statement develops one accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale and also broadens the reporting of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that can be distinguished from the rest of the entity in a disposal transaction. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted the accounting model for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets starting January 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.


In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation--Transition and Disclosure. This Statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Certain amendments to SFAS No. 123 of this Statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company currently follows the accounting provisions of APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for stock-based compensation and provides the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148.

2. Business combinations, dispositions and segment information

On May 1, 2002 the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Computed Imaging Service, Inc. (CIS) of Houston, Texas for 158,257 shares of Otter Tail Corporation common stock and approximately $1.2 million in cash. CIS provides computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging mobile services, interim rental, and sales and service of new, used and refurbished diagnostic imaging equipment. CIS serves hospitals and other healthcare facilities in the south central United States. The acquisition of CIS allows the Company to expand its existing health services operations into another region of the country. CIS annual revenues were approximately $5.9 million in 2001.

On May 28, 2002 the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of ShoreMaster, Inc. (ShoreMaster), of Fergus Falls, Minnesota for 303,124 shares of Otter Tail Corporation common stock and $2.3 million in cash. ShoreMaster is a leading manufacturer of waterfront equipment ranging from residential-use boatlifts and docks to commercial marina systems. The acquisition of ShoreMaster is expected to provide diversification and growth opportunities for the Company's manufacturing segment. ShoreMaster's annual revenues were approximately $20 million in 2001.

On October 1, 2002 the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Galva Foam Marine Industries, Inc. (Galva Foam), of Camdenton, Missouri for 256,940 shares of Otter Tail Corporation common stock and approximately $1.0 million in cash. Galva Foam is a leading manufacturer of waterfront equipment ranging from residential boatlifts and docks to commercial marina systems. The acquisition of Galva Foam in combination with the May 2002 acquisition of ShoreMaster will expand the market reach of the Company's waterfront manufacturing product line nationwide with both saltwater and freshwater products. Galva Foam had annual revenues of approximately $13 million in 2001.

In 2002, the Company also acquired two other businesses, neither of which was individually material, one in energy management services and the other in health services. The total purchase price for these businesses was approximately $2 million in cash.

All of the 2002 acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The pro forma effect of these acquisitions on 2001 and 2000 revenues, net income or earnings per share was not significant.


Below is a condensed balance sheet disclosing the fair value assigned to each major asset and liability category of the acquired companies.

(in thousands)                               CIS        ShoreMaster    Galva Foam       Others
--------------                               ---        -----------    ----------       ------
Assets
  Current assets                            $ 1,439        $ 9,510        $4,953        $  131
  Plant                                       3,975          4,599         1,713           298
  Goodwill                                    5,847          4,292         2,650         1,616
  Other intangible assets                        30          4,461            41            60
                                            -------        -------        ------        ------
      Total assets                          $11,291        $22,862        $9,357        $2,105
                                            =======        =======        ======        ======

Liabilities and equity
  Current liabilities                       $ 1,747        $ 9,642        $2,304        $   32
  Long-term debt                              2,584          2,723            --            --
  Other long-term liabilities                   707            797           372            --
  Equity                                      6,253          9,700         6,681         2,073
                                            -------        -------        ------        ------
     Total liabilities and equity           $11,291        $22,862        $9,357        $2,105
                                            =======        =======        ======        ======

On September 4, 2001 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Interim Solutions and Sales, Inc. and Midwest Medical Diagnostics, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota. These companies operate as a division of DMS Imaging, Inc. and provide mobile diagnostic imaging services on an interim basis for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, fee-per-exam options and sales of previously owned imaging equipment. Revenues for 2000 were approximately $3.1 million. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was $2.2 million.

On September 10, 2001 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Nuclear Imaging, Ltd., of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Nuclear Imaging provides mobile nuclear medicine, positron emission tomography and bone densitometry services to more than 120 healthcare facilities in the Midwest. Nuclear Imaging is a subsidiary of DMS Imaging, Inc. Revenues for 2000 were approximately $6.9 million. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was $4.8 million.

On November 1, 2001 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Titan Steel Corporation of Salt Lake City, Utah. Titan is a fabricator of steel products engaged in custom operations. Titan is an operating division of St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc. Revenues for 2000 were approximately $9 million. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was immaterial.

The above acquisitions of Interim Solutions and Sales, Inc., Midwest Medical Diagnostics, Inc., Nuclear Imaging, Ltd. and Titan Steel Corporation were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting under SFAS No. 141. Under the transition provision of SFAS No. 142, no goodwill was amortized for these acquisitions during 2001. The pro forma effect of these acquisitions on 2000 revenues, net income, or earnings per share was not significant.

On February 28, 2001 the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of T.O. Plastics, Inc. in exchange for 451,066 newly issued shares of the Company's common stock. T.O. Plastics, Inc. custom manufactures returnable pallets, material and handling trays and horticultural containers. It has three facilities in Minnesota and one facility in South Carolina.

On September 28, 2001 the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc. in exchange for 270,370 newly issued shares of the Company's common stock. St. George Steel is a fabricator of steel products engaged in custom and proprietary operations located in Utah.

The above two acquisitions were accounted for as pooling-of-interests. Since the St. George Steel acquisition was initiated prior to June 30, 2001, pooling-of-interest accounting was allowed under the transition provision of SFAS No. 141. The Company's consolidated financial statements for 2000 were restated to reflect the effects of the poolings.


On January 1, 2000 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Vinyltech Corporation (Vinyltech) located in Phoenix, Arizona. Vinyltech is a manufacturer of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe and produces approximately 90 million pounds of pipe annually. Annual revenues for 1999 were approximately $41 million.

On June 1, 2000 the Company acquired the assets and operations of Portable X-Ray & EKG, Inc. (PXE) located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. PXE is a provider of mobile x-ray, EKG, ultrasound and echocardiogram services primarily to patients in long-term care facilities in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market. Its 1999 annual revenues were approximately $2.8 million.

These acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.

Segment information--The accounting policies of the segments are described under note 1 - Summary of significant accounting policies. The Company's business operations consist of five segments based on products and services. Electric includes the electric utility operating in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota.

Plastics consists of businesses involved in the production of PVC pipe in the Upper Midwest and Southwest regions of the United States.

Manufacturing consists of businesses involved in the production of waterfront equipment, wind towers, frame-straightening equipment and accessories for the auto repair industry, custom plastic pallets, material and handling trays, horticultural containers, fabrication of steel products, contract machining, and metal parts stamping and fabrication located in the Upper Midwest, Missouri and Utah.

Health services include businesses involved in the sale of diagnostic medical equipment, supplies and accessories. These businesses also provide service maintenance, mobile diagnostic imaging, mobile positron emission tomography and nuclear medicine imaging, portable x-ray imaging and rental of diagnostic medical imaging equipment to various medical institutions located in 40 states.

Other business operations consists of businesses in electrical and telephone construction contracting, transportation, telecommunications, entertainment, energy services, and natural gas marketing, as well as the portion of corporate administrative and general expenses that are not allocated to other segments. The electrical and telephone construction contracting companies and energy services and natural gas marketing business operate primarily in the Upper Midwest. The telecommunications companies operate in central and northeast Minnesota and the transportation company operates in 48 states and 6 Canadian provinces.

The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments and allocates resources to them based on earnings contribution and return on total invested capital. Information for the business segments for 2002, 2001 and 2000 is presented in the following table.

                                         2002          2001           2000
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
                                                 (in thousands)
Operating revenue
   Electric                           $ 307,403      $ 307,684      $262,280
   Plastics                              82,931         63,216        82,667
   Manufacturing                        142,390        123,436        97,506
   Health services                       93,420         79,129        66,319
   Other business operations             83,972         80,667        78,159
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
      Total                           $ 710,116      $ 654,132      $586,931
                                      =========      =========      ========


Operating income
   Electric                           $  53,720      $  57,150      $ 49,268
   Plastics                              11,136         (1,391)        8,745
   Manufacturing                          9,771         12,175         6,945
   Health services                        8,370          6,862         5,729
   Other business operations             (1,015)         2,688         3,561
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
      Total operating income          $  81,982      $  77,484      $ 74,248
Other income and deductions - net         2,057          2,193         2,154
Interest charges                         17,850         15,991        17,005
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
   Income before income taxes         $  66,189      $  63,686      $ 59,397
                                      =========      =========      ========

Depreciation and amortization
   Electric                           $  24,910      $  24,272      $ 23,778
   Plastics                               1,760          3,229         3,301
   Manufacturing                          6,525          5,139         3,930
   Health services                        4,410          3,517         2,981
   Other business operations              5,008          5,943         6,572
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
      Total                           $  42,613      $  42,100      $ 40,562
                                      =========      =========      ========

Capital expenditures
   Electric                           $  45,842      $  34,992      $ 24,659
   Plastics                               5,592          1,572         3,361
   Manufacturing                         15,049         10,516         8,688
   Health services                        3,874          3,282         2,871
   Other business operations              5,176          3,234         6,694
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
      Total                           $  75,533      $  53,596      $ 46,273
                                      =========      =========      ========

Identifiable assets
   Electric                           $ 550,855      $ 523,948      $531,778
   Plastics                              54,926         45,649        49,831
   Manufacturing                        114,120         67,033        59,130
   Health services                       64,785         50,560        32,909
   Other business operations             94,050         95,351        64,060
                                      ---------      ---------      --------
      Total                           $ 878,736      $ 782,541      $737,708
                                      =========      =========      ========

No single external customer accounts for 10% or more of the Company's revenues. Substantially all sales and long-lived assets of the Company are within the United States.

3. Rate matters and arbitration settlement

In 2001, the Minnesota Legislature exempted certain generation machinery and attached equipment from state personal property tax. The law also requires that any property tax savings resulting from this exemption be refunded to utility customers. As a result of this law, $272,600 in 2001 property tax savings was refunded to Minnesota retail electric customers in 2002. On January 1, 2003 a Property Tax Reduction Rider became effective which reduces base electric rates by 0.27% to reflect ongoing tax savings.

On December 29, 2000 the North Dakota Public Service Commission (NDPSC) approved a performance-based ratemaking plan that links allowed earnings in North Dakota to seven defined performance standards in the areas of price, electric service reliability, customer satisfaction and employee safety. The plan is in place for 2001 through 2005, unless suspended or terminated by the NDPSC or the Company. This plan provides the opportunity for the electric utility to raise its allowed rate of return and shares income with customers when earnings exceed the allowed return. During 2001, the electric utility achieved a rate of return on equity that exceeded targets under the plan which resulted in a sharing of the income between shareholders and customers and led to a $662,300 refund to North Dakota retail electric customers in 2002. The electric utility's 2002 rate of return is expected to be within the allowable range defined in the plan.

During the second quarter of 2000, the Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota utility regulatory agencies approved the accounting treatment of settlement proceeds related to the Knife River coal contract arbitration. The settlement proceeds of $3.2 million (including interest) had been recorded as a liability


on the balance sheet since 1999 pending regulatory approval. The approval allowed the Company to recover arbitration costs of $1.0 million that had been previously expensed and to recognize as income $308,000 of fuel cost savings applicable to wholesale power pool sales. The remaining $1.9 million represents a reduction of fuel costs that were returned to the Company's electric retail customers through the cost-of-energy adjustment clause during 2000.

4. Regulatory assets and liabilities

The following table indicates the amount of regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet:

                                                  December 31,     December 31,
(in thousands)                                        2002            2001
--------------                                    ------------     ------------
Regulatory assets:
  Deferred income taxes                              $10,238          $ 5,117
  Debt expenses and reacquisition premiums             4,323            3,353
  Deferred conservation program costs                    844            1,059
  Plant acquisition costs                                329              373
  Accrued cost-of-energy revenue                         768               --
                                                     -------          -------
    Total regulatory assets                          $16,502          $ 9,902
                                                     -------          -------
Regulatory liabilities:
   Deferred income taxes                             $ 8,960          $ 9,735
   Gain on sale of division office building              173              179
                                                     -------          -------
      Total regulatory liabilities                   $ 9,133          $ 9,914
                                                     -------          -------
Net regulatory position                              $ 7,369          $   (12)
                                                     =======          =======

The regulatory assets and liabilities related to deferred income taxes are the result of the adoption of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred conservation program costs included in Deferred debits - Other represent mandated conservation expenditures recoverable through rates over the next 1.5 years. Plant acquisition costs included in Deferred debits - Other will be amortized over the next eight years. Accrued cost-of-energy revenue included in Accrued utility revenues will be recovered over the next six months. The remaining regulatory assets and liabilities are being recovered from electric customers over the next 32 years.

If for any reason, the Company's regulated businesses cease to meet the criteria for application of SFAS No. 71 for all or part of their operations, the regulatory assets and liabilities that no longer meet such criteria would be removed from the consolidated balance sheet and included in the consolidated statement of income as an extraordinary item in the period in which the application of SFAS No. 71 ceases.

5. Common shares and earnings per share

New issuances--Common stock issuances during 2002 included 718,321 unregistered shares exchanged in acquisitions, 131,167 shares issued as a result of stock options exercised, 3,382 shares issued as directors' compensation and 85,800 shares of restricted stock issued as officers' and directors' compensation.

Stock incentive plan--Under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) a total of 2,600,000 common shares were authorized for granting stock awards. The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of options, performance awards, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and other types of stock grants or stock-based awards. The exercise price of the stock options is equal to the fair market value per share at the date of the grant. Options granted to outside directors are exercisable immediately and all other options granted as of December 31, 2002 vest ratably over a four-year period. The options expire ten years after the date of the grant. The Company accounts for the Incentive Plan under APB 25.


Unearned compensation relating to the options granted in 1999 was $75,000 at December 31, 2002, and is included as a reduction of common equity.

Presented below is a summary of the stock options activity:

Stock Option Activity                          2002                       2001                        2000
                                        --------------------         --------------------       ------------------
                                                     Average                      Average                  Average
                                                    exercise                     exercise                 exercise
                                        Options        price         Options        price       Options      price
                                        -------        -----         -------        -----       -------      -----
Outstanding, beginning of year        1,265,042       $22.62         787,316       $19.55       442,900     $19.25
Granted                                 278,750        31.34         582,000        26.33       360,000      19.75
Exercised                               130,797        19.71          74,936        19.44           750      19.19
Forfeited                                52,274        22.83          29,338        22.17        14,834      19.30
                                     ----------       ------      ----------       ------     ---------     ------
Outstanding, year end                 1,360,721        24.68       1,265,042        22.62       787,316      19.55
                                     ----------       ------      ----------       ------     ---------     ------
Exercisable, year end                   449,385       $21.75         257,269       $19.83       127,542     $19.25
Fair value of options
 granted during year                 $     7.07                   $     5.88                  $    3.79

The fair value of the options granted were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model under the following assumptions:

                                            2002                  2001                  2000
                                            ----                  ----                  ----
Risk free interest rate                       5.2%                  5.5%                  5.2%
Expected lives                            7 years               7 years               7 years
Expected volatility                          26.0%                 24.9%                 23.7%
Dividend yield                                4.0%                  4.0%                  4.5%

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding as of December 31, 2002:

                                        Options outstanding                        Options exercisable
                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Weighted-
                                               average         Weighted-                         Weighted-
                          Outstanding        remaining           average        Exercisable        average
Range of                        as of      contractual          exercise              as of       exercise
exercise prices              12/31/02       life (yrs)             price           12/31/02          price
---------------           -----------      -----------         ---------        -----------      ---------
$18.80-$21.94                 539,596              6.6           $ 19.47            297,510        $ 19.41
$21.95-$25.07                      --               --                --                 --             --
$25.08-$26.77                 526,375              8.3           $ 26.25            147,875        $ 26.25
$26.78-$31.34                 294,750              9.2           $ 31.23              4,000        $ 29.34

In addition to the stock options granted, 85,800, 1,681 and 12,415 shares of restricted stock were granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The total compensation cost recognized in income for stock-based employee compensation awards was $879,000 in 2002, $125,000 in 2001 and $314,000 in 2000. See note 1 for pro forma stock option information.

Employee stock purchase plan--The 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Purchase Plan) allows eligible employees to purchase the Company's common shares at 85% of the lower market price at either the beginning or the end of each six-month purchase period. A total of 400,000 common shares are available for purchase by employees under the Purchase Plan. To provide shares for the Purchase Plan, common shares were purchased in the open market totaling 57,997 shares in 2002, 56,612 shares in 2001 and 53,630 shares in 2000.

Dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan--On August 30, 1996 the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the issuance of up to 2,000,000 common shares pursuant to the Company's Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (the Plan), which permits shares purchased by shareholders or customers who participate in the Plan to be either new issue common shares or common shares purchased in the open market. Since June 1999, common shares needed for the Plan have been purchased in the open market.

Shareholder rights plan--On January 27, 1997 the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (Right) for each outstanding common share held of record as of February 10, 1997. One Right was


also issued with respect to each common share issued after February 10, 1997. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of newly created Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a price of $70, subject to certain adjustment. The Rights are exercisable when, and are not transferable apart from the Company's common shares until, a person or group has acquired 15% or more, or commenced a tender or exchange offer for 15% or more, of the Company's common shares. If the specified percentage of the Company's common shares is acquired, each Right will entitle the holder (other than the acquiring person or group) to receive, on exercise, common shares of either the Company or the acquiring company having value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. The Rights are redeemable by the Company's Board of Directors in certain circumstances and expire on January 27, 2007.

Earnings per share--Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing earnings available for common shares by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are calculated by adjusting outstanding shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options.

6. Retained earnings restriction

The Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, contain provisions that limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to common shareholders by the amount of any declared but unpaid dividends to holders of the Company's cumulative preferred shares. Under these provisions none of the Company's retained earnings were restricted at December 31, 2002.

7. Commitments and contingencies

At December 31, 2002 the electric utility had commitments under contracts in connection with construction programs aggregating approximately $6,563,000. For capacity and energy requirements the electric utility has agreements extending through 2007, at annual costs of approximately $15,104,000 in 2003, $14,435,000 in 2004, $12,932,000 in 2005, $12,200,000 in 2006 and $12,217,000 in 2007.

The electric utility has contracts providing for the purchase and delivery of a significant portion of its current coal requirements. These contracts expire between 2003 and 2016. In total, the electric utility is committed to the minimum purchase of approximately $92,674,000 or to make payments in lieu thereof, under these contracts. The cost-of-energy adjustment mechanism lessens the risk of loss from market price changes because it provides for recovery of most fuel costs.

The amounts of future operating lease payments are as follows:

                           Electric          Nonelectric
                            utility           companies            Total
                            -------           ---------            -----
                                          (in thousands)
2003                        $ 1,799           $17,995             $19,794
2004                          1,592            14,576              16,168
2005                          1,302            11,856              13,158
2006                          1,302             6,444               7,746
2007                          1,302             2,401               3,703
Later years                   3,547               650               4,197
                            -------           -------             -------
Total                       $10,844           $53,922             $64,766
                            =======           =======             =======

Rent expense was $22,282,000, $20,242,000 and $16,595,000, for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The Company occasionally is a party to litigation arising in the normal course of business. The Company regularly analyzes current information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. The Company believes the effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows, if any, for the disposition of all currently pending matters will not be material.


8. Short-term and Long-term borrowings

Short-term debt--The Company has a $50 million line of credit. This line of credit bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 0.5% and expires on April 29, 2003. The Company does not anticipate any difficulties in renewing this line of credit. The Company's bank line of credit is a key source of operating capital and can provide interim financing of working capital and other capital requirements, if needed. The Company's obligations under this line of credit are guaranteed by a 100%-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns substantially all of the Company's nonelectric companies. As of December 31, 2002, $30 million of the $50 million line was in use.

The interest rate under the line of credit is subject to adjustment in the event of a change in ratings on the Company's senior unsecured debt, up to LIBOR plus 0.8% if the ratings on the Company's senior unsecured debt fall to BBB+ or below (Standard & Poor's) or Baa1 or below (Moody's). The line of credit also provides for accelerated repayment in the event the Company's long-term senior unsecured debt is rated below BBB- (Standard & Poor's) or Baa3 (Moody's).

Long-term debt--In 2002, the Company filed with the SEC a shelf registration statement for $200 million of unsecured debt securities. On September 27, 2002 the Company issued $65 million of senior unsecured notes under the shelf registration statement. The offering consisted of $40 million of 5.625% insured senior notes due 2017 and $25 million of 6.80% senior notes due 2032. Net proceeds from these issues were used to pay off short-term debt that was used to retire the Company's 7.25% series first mortgage bonds at maturity on August 1, 2002 in the amount of $18.2 million, and to retire early on October 31, 2002 the Company's outstanding $27.3 million 8.25% series 2022 first mortgage bonds at an aggregate redemption price of $28.5 million. The remaining proceeds were used to repay short-term debt used to finance a portion of the costs related to the new gas-fired combustion turbine plant being constructed by the electric utility.

As a result of the financing described above, the Company repaid all of its outstanding first mortgage bonds and terminated its first mortgage indenture. The Company has the ability to issue up to an additional $135 million of unsecured debt securities from time to time under its shelf registration statement on file with the SEC. Proceeds from subsequent debt issuances under the shelf registration, if any, may be used for other general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayment, the financing of possible acquisitions or stock repurchases.

The Company's 6.63% senior notes contain an investment grade put that could require the Company to prepay this series with a make-whole premium if the Company's senior unsecured debt is rated below Baa3 (Moody's) or BBB- (Standard & Poor's). The Company's obligations under the 6.63% senior notes are guaranteed by a 100%-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns substantially all of the Company's nonelectric companies. The Company's Grant County and Mercer County pollution control refunding revenue bonds require that the Company grant to Ambac Assurance Corporation, under a financial guaranty insurance policy relating to the bonds, a security interest in the assets of the electric utility if the rating on the Company's senior unsecured debt is downgraded to Baa2 or below (Moody's) or BBB or below (Standard & Poor's and Fitch). The Company believes the risk of the downgrade events described in this paragraph occurring is remote based on the current bond ratings of the Company combined with its strong debt-to-equity ratio and ability to generate cash from operations.

The aggregate amounts of maturities on bonds outstanding and other long-term obligations at December 31, 2002 for each of the next five years are $7,827,000 for 2003, $7,194,000 for 2004, $5,678,000 for 2005, $3,301,000 for 2006 and $50,837,000 for 2007.

Covenants--The Company's line of credit and its $90 million 6.63% senior notes due 2011 contain a number of covenants that restrict the Company's ability, with significant exceptions, to: engage in mergers or consolidations; dispose of assets; create liens on assets; engage in transactions with affiliates; take any action which would result in a decrease in the ownership interest in any subsidiary; redeem stock or any subsidiary's stock and pay dividends on stock; make investments, loans or advances; guaranty the obligations of other persons or


agree to maintain the net worth or working capital of, or provide funds to satisfy any other financial test applicable to, any other person; and enter into a contract that requires payment to be made by the Company whether or not delivery of the materials, supplies or services is ever made under the contract. In addition, specified financial covenants under the line of credit and the 6.63% senior notes require a debt-to-total capitalization ratio not in excess of 60% and an interest and dividend coverage ratio of at least 1.5 to 1. The 6.63% senior notes also require that priority debt not be in excess of 20% of total capitalization.

As of December 31, 2002 the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under its line of credit and its other debt obligations.

9. Pension plan and other postretirement benefits

Pension plan--The Company's noncontributory funded pension plan covers substantially all electric utility and corporate employees. The plan provides 100% vesting after 5 vesting years of service and for retirement compensation at age 65, with reduced compensation in cases of retirement prior to age 62. The Company reserves the right to discontinue the plan but no change or discontinuance may affect the pensions theretofore vested. The Company's policy is to fund pension costs accrued. All past service costs have been provided for.

The pension plan has a trustee who is responsible for pension payments to retirees. Four investment managers are responsible for managing the plan's assets. An independent actuary performs the necessary actuarial valuations for the plan.

Net periodic pension cost/(income) for 2002, 2001 and 2000 includes the following components:

                                                     2002          2001          2000
                                                   --------      --------      --------
                                                              (in thousands)
Service cost--benefit earned during the period     $  3,120      $  2,544      $  2,458
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation         9,269         8,766         8,439
Expected return on assets                           (14,957)      (14,610)      (13,662)
Amortization of transition asset                        (73)         (235)         (235)
Amortization of prior-service cost                    1,285         1,107         1,107
Amortization of net gain                             (1,284)       (1,900)       (1,869)
                                                   --------      --------      --------
Net periodic pension cost/(income)                 $ (2,640)     $ (4,328)     $ (3,762)
                                                   ========      ========      ========

The plan assets consist of common stock and bonds of public companies, U.S. government securities, cash and cash equivalents.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plan's benefit obligations and fair value of assets over the two-year period ending December 31, 2002 and a statement of the funded status as of December 31 of both years:

                                                        2002             2001
                                                      ---------       ---------
Reconciliation of benefit obligation:                   (in thousands)

Obligation at January 1                               $ 124,523       $ 116,444
Service cost                                              3,120           2,544
Interest cost                                             9,269           8,766
Benefit payments                                         (7,760)         (7,563)
Plan amendments                                           2,770              --
Actuarial loss                                           13,340           4,332
                                                      ---------       ---------
Obligation at December 31                             $ 145,262       $ 124,523
                                                      =========       =========
Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1                $ 138,794       $ 153,649
Actual return on plan assets                            (17,231)         (7,292)
Benefit payments                                         (7,760)         (7,563)
                                                      ---------       ---------
Fair value of plan assets at December 31              $ 113,803       $ 138,794
                                                      =========       =========


Reconciliation of funded status:
Accumulated benefit obligation                     $(119,235)         $ (95,390)

Projected benefit obligation                        (145,262)          (124,523)
Market value of fund assets                          113,803            138,794
                                                   ---------          ---------
Funded status                                        (31,459)            14,271
Unrecognized transition asset                             --                (73)
Unrecognized prior-service cost                        8,195              6,710
Unrecognized net loss/(gain)                          32,981            (13,831)
                                                   ---------          ---------
Prepaid pension cost                                   9,717              7,077
Additional minimum liability                         (15,149)                --
                                                   ---------          ---------
Net pension (liability)/asset                      $  (5,432)         $   7,077
                                                   =========          =========

The following table provides the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 of both years:

                                                           2002            2001
                                                         -------          ------
                                                             (in thousands)
Net pension (liability)/asset                            $(5,432)         $7,077
Intangible asset                                           8,195              --
Accumulated other comprehensive loss                       6,954              --
                                                         -------          ------
Net amount recognized                                    $ 9,717          $7,077
                                                         =======          ======

The assumptions used for actuarial valuations were:

                                                                  2002          2001
                                                                  ----          ----
Discount rate
  Used for net periodic pension cost                              7.50%         7.75%
  Used to value pension (liability)/asset at year end             6.75%         7.50%
Rate of increase in future compensation level                     4.25%         4.25%
Long-term rate of return on assets                                9.50%         9.50%

The assumed rate of return on pension fund assets for the determination of 2003 net periodic pension cost is 8.5%.

Executive survivor and supplemental retirement plan--The Company has an unfunded, nonqualified benefit plan for executive officers and certain key management employees. This plan provides defined benefit payments to these employees on their retirements for life or to their beneficiaries on their death for a 15-year postretirement period. Life insurance carried on the plan participants is payable to the Company on the employee's death. There are no plan assets in this nonqualified benefit plan due to the nature of the plan.

Net periodic pension cost for 2002, 2001 and 2000 includes the following components:

                                                     2002        2001         2000
                                                   -------      -------      -------
                                                            (in thousands)
Service cost--benefit earned during the period     $   (51)     $   (76)     $  (136)
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation        1,175          956          798
Amortization of transition obligation                   --           --           17
Amortization of prior-service cost                      86          191          191
Recognized net actuarial loss                          398          117            1
                                                   -------      -------      -------
Net periodic pension cost                          $ 1,608      $ 1,188      $   871
Early retirement benefit                               240           --          711
                                                   -------      -------      -------
Total                                              $ 1,848      $ 1,188      $ 1,582
                                                   =======      =======      =======

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plan's benefit obligations over the two-year period ending December 31, 2002 and a statement of the funded status as of December 31 of both years:

                                                          2002           2001
                                                        --------      --------
Reconciliation of benefit obligation:                        (in thousands)
Obligation at January 1                                 $ 14,365      $ 12,713

Service cost                                                 (51)          (76)
Interest cost                                              1,175           956
Plan amendments                                             (182)         (939)
Actuarial loss                                             5,566         2,451
Early retirement                                             240            --
Benefit payments                                            (804)         (740)
                                                        --------      --------
Obligation at December 31                               $ 20,309      $ 14,365
                                                        ========      ========
Funded status:
Funded status at December 31                            $(20,309)     $(14,365)
Unrecognized prior-service cost                              836         1,104
Unrecognized net actuarial loss                           10,292         5,124
                                                        --------      --------
Net amount recognized                                   $ (9,181)     $ (8,137)
                                                        ========      ========


The following table provides the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31:

                                                           2002          2001
                                                         --------      --------
                                                              (in thousands)
Accrued benefit liability                                $(15,052)     $(11,216)
Intangible asset                                              836         1,104
Accumulated other comprehensive loss                        5,035         1,975
                                                         --------      --------
Net amount recognized                                    $ (9,181)     $ (8,137)
                                                         ========      ========

The assumptions used for actuarial valuations were:

                                                            2002           2001
                                                            ----           ----
Discount rate
  Used for net periodic pension cost                        7.50%          7.75%
  Used to value pension liability at year end               6.75%          7.50%
Rate of increase in future compensation level               5.63%          4.50%

Postretirement benefits--The Company provides a portion of health insurance and life insurance benefits for retired electric utility and corporate employees. Substantially all of the Company's electric utility and corporate employees may become eligible for health insurance benefits if they reach age 55 and have 10 years of service. On adoption of SFAS No. 106, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, in January 1993, the Company elected to recognize its transition obligation related to postretirement benefits earned of approximately $14,964,000 over a period of 20 years. There are no plan assets.

The net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 2002, 2001 and 2000 includes the following components:

                                                     2002        2001         2000
                                                   -------      -------      ------
                                                           (in thousands)
Service cost--benefit earned during the period     $   615      $   681      $  688
Interest cost on accumulated
  postretirement benefit obligation                  2,166        1,768       1,701
Amortization of transition obligation                  748          748         748
Amortization of prior-service cost                    (305)         111         111
Life insurance benefits                                 --           --         865
Amortization of net gain                                --          (51)         --
                                                   -------      -------      ------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost           $ 3,224      $ 3,257      $4,113
                                                   =======      =======      ======

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plan's benefit obligations over the two-year period ending December 31, 2002 and a statement of the funded status as of December 31 of both years:

                                                           2002          2001
                                                         --------      --------
Reconciliation of benefit obligation:                         (in thousands)
Obligation at January 1                                  $ 28,550      $ 24,606
Service cost                                                  615           681
Interest cost                                               2,166         1,768
Benefit payments                                           (2,436)       (2,264)
Participant premium payments                                  953           682
Plan amendments                                              (285)           --
Actuarial loss                                              9,755         3,077
                                                         --------      --------
Obligation at December 31                                $ 39,318      $ 28,550
                                                         ========      ========
Funded status:
Funded status at December 31                             $(39,318)     $(28,550)
Unrecognized transition obligation                          7,482         8,230
Unrecognized prior-service cost                               395           375
Unrecognized loss                                          11,059         1,304
                                                         --------      --------
Net amount recognized                                    $(20,382)     $(18,641)
                                                         ========      ========


The following table provides the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31:

                                                     2002                 2001
                                                   --------            --------
                                                          (in thousands)
Accrued benefit liability                          $(20,382)           $(18,641)

The assumed health-care cost-trend rate used in measuring the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002 was 12.0% for 2003, decreasing linearly each successive year until it reaches 5.0% in 2010, after which it remains constant. The assumed discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 6.75% as of December 31, 2002 and 7.50% as of December 31, 2001.

Assumed health-care cost-trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health-care cost-trend rates for 2002 would have the following effects:

                                                          1 point        1 point
                                                         increase       decrease
                                                         --------       --------
                                                              (in thousands)
Effect on total of service and interest
   cost components                                         $  361       $  (309)
Effect on the postretirement benefit obligation            $4,662       $(3,894)

Leveraged employee stock ownership plan--The Company has a leveraged employee stock ownership plan for the benefit of all its electric utility and corporate employees. Contributions made by the Company were $1,100,000 for both 2002 and 2001 and $1,130,000 for 2000.

10. Fair value of financial instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and short-term investments--The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments.

Other investments--The carrying amount approximates fair value. A portion of other investments is in financial instruments that have variable interest rates that reflect fair value. The remainder of other investments is accounted for by the equity method which, in the case of operating losses, results in a reduction of the carrying amount.

Long-term debt--The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is estimated based on the current rates available to the Company for the issuance of debt. About $15.5 million of the Company's long-term debt, which is subject to variable interest rates, approximates fair value.

                                                                       2002                           2001
                                                              ------------------------      ------------------------
                                                                                 (in thousands)
                                                               Carrying        Fair         Carrying         Fair
                                                                amount         value         amount          value
                                                              ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
Cash and short-term investments                               $   9,937      $   9,937      $  11,378      $  11,378
Other investments                                                18,439         18,439         18,009         18,009
Long-term debt                                                 (258,229)      (277,261)      (227,360)      (255,785)


11. Property, plant and equipment

                                                                  2002         2001
                                                                --------     --------
                                                             (December 31, in thousands)
Electric plant:
   Production                                                   $314,093     $313,013
   Transmission                                                  172,610      158,639
   Distribution                                                  268,400      258,774
   General                                                        80,279       80,044
                                                                --------     --------
      Electric plant                                             835,382      810,470
   Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                392,931      376,241
                                                                --------     --------
      Electric plant net of accumulated depreciation             442,451      434,229
   Construction work in progress                                  39,123       25,094
                                                                --------     --------
      Net electric plant                                        $481,574     $459,323
                                                                --------     --------
   Nonelectric operations plant                                 $178,656     $145,712
   Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                 74,828       65,622
                                                                --------     --------
      Nonelectric plant net of accumulated depreciation          103,828       80,090
   Construction work in progress                                   2,484        3,564
                                                                --------     --------
      Net nonelectric operations plant                          $106,312     $ 83,654
                                                                --------     --------
         Net plant                                              $587,886     $542,977
                                                                ========     ========

The estimated service lives for rate-regulated properties is 5 to 65 years. For nonelectric property the estimated useful lives are from 3 to 40 years.

                                            Service Life Range
                                            ------------------
(years)                                    Low            High
-------                                    ---            ----
Electric fixed assets:
  Production plant                           34             62
  Transmission plant                         40             55
  Distribution plant                         15             55
  General plant                               5             65

Nonelectric fixed assets                      3             40


12. Income taxes

The total income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax rate (35% in 2002, 2001 and 2000) to net income before total income tax expense for the following reasons:

                                                          2002           2001           2000
                                                        --------       --------       --------
                                                                    (in thousands)
Tax computed at federal statutory rate                  $ 23,167       $ 22,290       $ 20,789
Increases (decreases) in tax from:
   State income taxes net of federal income tax
      benefit                                              2,441          2,564          2,279
   Investment tax credit amortization                     (1,152)        (1,176)        (1,183)
   Differences reversing in excess of federal rates       (1,055)          (503)          (774)
   Dividend received/paid deduction                         (699)          (674)          (670)
   Affordable housing tax credits                         (1,418)        (1,418)        (1,414)
   Permanent and other differences                        (1,223)        (1,000)          (672)
                                                        --------       --------       --------
      Total income tax expense                          $ 20,061       $ 20,083       $ 18,355
                                                        ========       ========       ========

Overall effective federal and state income tax rate         30.3%          31.5%          30.9%

Income tax expense includes the following:
   Current federal income taxes                         $ 18,651       $ 21,110       $ 21,835
   Current state income taxes                              3,856          3,107          4,162
   Deferred federal income taxes                              15         (2,247)        (4,717)
   Deferred state income taxes                               109            707           (328)
   Affordable housing tax credits                         (1,418)        (1,418)        (1,414)
   Investment tax credit amortization                     (1,152)        (1,176)        (1,183)
                                                        --------       --------       --------
      Total                                             $ 20,061       $ 20,083       $ 18,355
                                                        ========       ========       ========

The Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities were composed of the following on December 31, 2002 and 2001:

                                                      2002               2001
                                                    ---------         ---------
                                                          (in thousands)
Deferred tax assets
   Amortization of tax credits                      $   8,345         $   9,098
   Vacation accrual                                     1,836             1,892
   Unearned revenue                                     1,420             1,850
   Operating reserves                                  15,690            13,552
   Differences related to property                      5,239             4,394
   Transfer to regulatory liability                       618               577
   Other                                                2,956             2,025
                                                    ---------         ---------
      Total deferred tax assets                     $  36,104         $  33,388
                                                    =========         =========

Deferred tax liabilities
   Differences related to property                   (109,224)         (104,764)
   Excess tax over book pension                        (3,855)           (2,812)
   Transfer to regulatory asset                       (10,237)           (5,053)
   Other                                               (2,448)           (2,330)
                                                    ---------         ---------
     Total deferred tax liabilities                 $(125,764)        $(114,959)
                                                    ---------         ---------
           Deferred income taxes                    $ (89,660)        $ (81,571)
                                                    =========         =========


13. Quarterly information (unaudited)

Because of changes in the number of common shares outstanding and the impact of diluted shares, the sum of the quarterly earnings per common share may not equal total earnings per common share.

                                                                       Three Months Ended
                                            March 31               June 30            September 30          December 31
                                       -------------------   -------------------   -------------------   -------------------
                                         2002       2001       2002       2001       2002       2001      2002       2001
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                              (in thousands, except per share data)
Operating revenues                     $157,733   $159,654   $176,572   $157,332   $185,750   $177,674   $190,061   $159,472
Operating income                         18,935     22,438     19,848     15,720     23,008     20,310     20,191     19,016

Net income                               10,032     12,000     10,587      9,157     12,882     11,077     12,627     11,369
Earnings available for common shares      9,848     11,530     10,403      8,688     12,698     10,607     12,443     10,785

Basic earnings per share               $    .40   $    .47   $    .41   $    .35   $    .50   $    .43   $    .49   $    .44
Diluted earnings per share                  .40        .47        .41        .35        .50        .43        .48        .43
Dividends paid per common share            .265        .26       .265        .26       .265        .26       .265        .26

Price range:
      High                             $  31.80   $  31.00   $  34.90   $  30.10   $  31.50   $  30.00   $  29.23   $  29.45
      Low                                 25.75      23.00      28.50      24.12      22.82      26.75      25.22      27.50
Average number of common shares
      outstanding--basic                 24,668     24,577     25,117     24,586     25,328     24,606     25,589     24,633
Average number of common shares
      outstanding--diluted               24,919     24,776     25,412     24,799     25,497     24,881     25,781     24,912


Otter Tail Corporation Stock Listing

Otter Tail Corporation common stock trades on The Nasdaq Stock Market.


.

.
.

EXHIBIT 21-A

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

Subsidiaries of the Registrant
March 1, 2003

Company                                        State of Organization
-------                                        ---------------------
Minnesota-Dakota Generating Company                  Minnesota
Otter Tail Energy Services Company, Inc.             Minnesota
Overland Mechanical Services                         Minnesota
Varistar Corporation                                 Minnesota
Northern Pipe Products, Inc.                         North Dakota
Vinyltech Corporation                                Arizona
T.O. Plastics, Inc.                                  Minnesota
St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc.                   Utah
DMI Industries, Inc.                                 North Dakota
BTD Manufacturing, Inc.                              Minnesota
ShoreMaster, Inc.                                    Minnesota
Galva Foam Marine Industries, Inc.                   Missouri
DMS Health Technologies, Inc.                        North Dakota
DMS Imaging, Inc.                                    North Dakota
DMS Computed Imaging, Inc.                           Texas
DMS Imaging Canada, Inc.*                            Province of Ontario, Canada
Nuclear Consultants, Inc.                            South Dakota
Midwest Imaging L.L.C.                               Kansas
DMS Leasing Corporation*                             North Dakota
Midwest Construction Services, Inc.                  Minnesota
Aerial Contractors, Inc.                             North Dakota
Moorhead Electric, Inc.                              Minnesota
Dakota Direct Control, Inc.                          South Dakota
Chassis Liner Corporation                            Minnesota
Chassis Liner Credit Corp.*                          Minnesota
Chart Automotive LLC                                 Minnesota
E. W. Wylie Corporation                              North Dakota
Midwest Information Systems, Inc.                    Minnesota
Midwest Telephone Company                            Minnesota
Osakis Telephone Company                             Minnesota
The Peoples Telephone Co. of Bigfork                 Minnesota
Data Video Systems, Inc.                             Minnesota
MIS Investments, Inc.                                Minnesota
Fargo Baseball, LLC                                  Minnesota
Fargo Sports Concession LLC                          Minnesota

* Inactive


EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-90952 and 333-11145 on Form S-3 and 333-25261, 333-73041, 333-73075 on Form S-8 of Otter Tail Corporation of our report dated January 29, 2003 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets as described in Note 1) appearing in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Otter Tail Corporation and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Otter Tail Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 24, 2003


Exhibit 24-A

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, KEVIN MOUG, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: February 4, 2003.


                                                    /s/  Kevin Moug
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                         Kevin Moug

In Presence of:

Pat Murray

George Koeck

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, JOHN C. MAC FARLANE, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: January 27, 2003.


                                                /s/  John C. MacFarlane
                                            --------------------------------
                                                     John C. MacFarlane

In Presence of:

Dee Fletcher

Penny Mosher

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, THOMAS M. BROWN, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date:  January 27, 2003.


                                                 /s/ Thomas M. Brown
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Thomas M. Brown

In Presence of:

Donna M. Hull

Vivian J. Brown

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, DENNIS R. EMMEN, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: February 2, 2003.


                                                    /s/ Dennis R. Emmen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                        Dennis R. Emmen

In Presence of:

Gary L. Tygesson

Lauris N. Molbert

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, MAYNARD D. HELGAAS, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: February 2, 2003.


                                                 /s/ Maynard D. Helgaas
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     Maynard D. Helgaas

In Presence of:

Nathan Partain

John MacFarlane

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, ARVID LIEBE, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: January 27, 2003.


                                                        /s/  Arvid Liebe
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                             Arvid Liebe

In Presence of:

Melody Kunde

Kathleen Schweer

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, KENNETH L. NELSON, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: February 2, 2003.


                                                   /s/  Kenneth L. Nelson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                        Kenneth L. Nelson

In Presence of:

Maynard D. Helgaas

Nathan Partain

POWER OF ATTORNEY

I, NATHAN PARTAIN, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date:  February 2, 2003.


                                                    /s/  Nathan Partain
                                                ----------------------------
                                                         Nathan Partain

In Presence of:

Maynard D. Helgaas

Gary Spies

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, GARY SPIES, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: February 2, 2003.


                                                        /s/  Gary Spies
                                                ----------------------------
                                                             Gary Spies

In Presence of:

Gary L. Tygesson

Lauris N. Molbert

POWER OF ATTORNEY


I, ROBERT N. SPOLUM, do hereby constitute and appoint JOHN D. ERICKSON and GEORGE A. KOECK, or any one of them, my Attorney-in-Fact for the purpose of signing, in my name and on my behalf as Director of Otter Tail Corporation, the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report, and to deliver on my behalf said Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto, as each thereof is so signed, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Date: January 28, 2003.


                                                      /s/ Robert N. Spolum
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                          Robert N. Spolum

In Presence of:

Daniel N. Kraatz

Joy Marshall

EXHIBIT 99-A

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D. Erickson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  John D. Erickson
-------------------------------------
John D. Erickson
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Otter Tail Corporation and will be retained by Otter Tail Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


EXHIBIT 99-B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin G. Moug, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin G. Moug
-------------------------------------
Kevin G. Moug
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
March 26, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Otter Tail Corporation and will be retained by Otter Tail Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.