SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2003 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to . |
Commission file number: 0-50150
CHS Inc.
Minnesota
|
41-0251095 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
5500 Cenex Drive
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55077 (Address of principal executive office, including zip code) |
(651) 355-6000
(Registrants Telephone number, including area code) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K: o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter:
The registrants voting and non-voting common equity has no market value (the registrant is a member cooperative).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: The registrant has no common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
INDEX
Page | ||||||
No. | ||||||
|
||||||
PART I. | ||||||
Item 1.
|
Business | 2 | ||||
Cautionary Statement | 2 | |||||
The Company | 2 | |||||
Agronomy | 3 | |||||
Energy | 5 | |||||
Country Operations and Services | 8 | |||||
Grain Marketing | 10 | |||||
Processed Grains and Foods | 12 | |||||
Price Risk and Hedging | 15 | |||||
Employees | 16 | |||||
Membership in the Company and Authorized Capital | 16 | |||||
Item 2.
|
Properties | 19 | ||||
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings | 20 | ||||
Item 4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 21 | ||||
PART II. | ||||||
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters | 22 | ||||
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data | 22 | ||||
Item 7.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 24 | ||||
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 38 | ||||
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 39 | ||||
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 39 | ||||
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures | 39 | ||||
PART III. | ||||||
Item 10.
|
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | 41 | ||||
Board of Directors | 41 | |||||
Executive Officers | 44 | |||||
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 45 | |||||
Code of Ethics | 46 | |||||
Audit Committee Matters | 46 | |||||
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation | 46 | ||||
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | 54 | ||||
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 54 | ||||
PART IV. | ||||||
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 55 | ||||
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statements and Reports Filed on Form 8-K | 56 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | 59 | |||||
SIGNATURES | 60 |
1
The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2003, includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the Company. In addition, the Company and its representatives and agents may from time to time make other written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and its reports to its members and securityholders. Words and phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate, project and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
The Companys forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks related to the level of commodity prices, loss of member business, competition, changes in the taxation of cooperatives, compliance with laws and regulations , environmental liabilities, perceptions of food quality and safety, business interruptions and casualty losses, access to equity capital, consolidation of producers and customers, fluctuations in prices for crude oil and refined petroleum products, alternative energy sources, the performance of our agronomy business, technological improvements and joint ventures. These risks and uncertainties are further described in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other risks or uncertainties may be described from time to time in the Companys future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company undertakes no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
CHS Inc. (CHS or the Company) is one of the nations leading integrated agricultural companies. As a cooperative, the Company is owned by farmers and ranchers and their local cooperatives from the Great Lakes to the Pacific Northwest and from the Canadian border to Texas. CHS buys commodities from and provides products and services to its members and other customers. The Company provides a wide variety of products and services, from initial agricultural inputs such as fuels, farm supplies, crop nutrients and crop protection products, to agricultural outputs that include grains and oilseeds, grain and oilseed processing and food products. A portion of the Companys operations are conducted through equity investments and joint ventures whose operating results are not fully consolidated with the Companys results; rather, a proportionate share of the income or loss from those entities is included as a component in the Companys net income under the equity method of accounting. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, the Companys total revenues were $9.4 billion.
The Companys operations are organized into five business segments: Agronomy, Energy, Country Operations and Services, Grain Marketing and Processed Grains and Foods. Together these business segments create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. The first two segments, Agronomy and Energy, produce and provide for the wholesale distribution of inputs that are essential for crop production. The third segment, Country Operations and Services, serves as the Company-owned retailer of a portion of these crop inputs and also serves as the first handler of a significant portion of the crops marketed and processed by the Company. The fourth segment, Grain Marketing, purchases and resells grains and oilseeds originated by the Country Operations and Services segment, by member cooperatives and also by third parties. The fifth business segment, Processed Grains and Foods, converts grains and oilseeds into value-added products.
2
Only producers of agricultural products and associations of producers of agricultural products may be members of CHS. The Companys earnings derived from business conducted with these members are allocated to members based on the volume of business they do with the Company. Members receive earnings in the form of patronage refunds in cash and patrons equities, which may be redeemed over time. Earnings derived from non-members are taxed at regular corporate rates and are retained by the Company as unallocated equity.
The origins of CHS date back to the early 1930s with the founding of the predecessor companies of Cenex, Inc. and Harvest States Cooperatives. CHS emerged as the result of the merger of the two entities in 1998, and is headquartered in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. In August 2003, the Company changed its name from Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives to CHS Inc.
The international sales information and segment information in Notes 2 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference into the following business segment descriptions.
The business segment financial information presented below does not represent the results that would have been obtained had the relevant business segment been operated as an independent business.
Overview
Through the Agronomy business segment, the Company is engaged in the manufacture of crop nutrients and the wholesale distribution of crop nutrients and crop protection products. The Company conducts its agronomy operations primarily through two investments a 20% cooperative ownership interest in CF Industries, Inc. (CF Industries) and, effective January 2000, a 25% ownership interest in Agriliance, LLC (Agriliance). CF Industries manufactures crop nutrient products, particularly nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers, and is one of the largest suppliers to Agriliance. Agriliance is one of North Americas largest wholesale distributors of crop nutrients, crop protection products and other agronomy products.
There is significant seasonality in the sale of crop nutrients and crop protection products and services, with peak activity coinciding with the planting and input seasons.
The Companys minority ownership interests in CF Industries and Agriliance are treated as investments, and therefore, those entities revenues and expenses are not reflected in the Companys operating results. CF Industries is treated as a cost method investment and Agriliance is treated as an equity method investment. CF Industries and Agriliance each have their own line of financing, without recourse to the Company.
Operations
CF Industries. CF Industries is an interregional agricultural cooperative involved in the manufacturing of crop nutrient products. It is one of North Americas largest producers of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers. Through its members, CF Industries nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer products reach farmers and ranchers in 48 states and two Canadian provinces. CF Industries conducts its operations primarily from the following facilities:
| a nitrogen manufacturing and processing facility at Donaldsonville, Louisiana; | |
| a phosphate mine and phosphate fertilizer plant in central Florida; and | |
| a 66% ownership interest in a nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing and processing facility in Alberta, Canada. |
Agriliance. Agriliance is the one of the nations largest wholesale distributors of crop nutrients (fertilizers) and crop protection products (insecticides, fungicides and pesticides), accounting for an estimated 19% of the U.S. market for crop nutrients and approximately 26% of the U.S. market for crop
3
Agriliance was formed in 2000 when CHS, Farmland Industries Inc. (Farmland) and Land OLakes, Inc. (Land OLakes) contributed their respective agronomy businesses to the new company in consideration for ownership interests (25% each for CHS and Farmland and 50% for Land OLakes) in the venture. CHS and Farmland hold their interests in Agriliance through United Country Brands, LLC, a 50/50 jointly-owned holding company.
In April, 2003, CHS acquired a 13.1% additional economic interest in the crop protection products business of Agriliance (the CPP Business) for a cash payment of $34.3 million. After the transaction, the economic interests in Agriliance are owned 50% by Land O Lakes, 25% plus an additional 13.1% of the CPP Business by CHS and 25% less 13.1% of the CPP Business by Farmland. The ownership or governance interests in Agriliance did not change with the purchase of this additional economic interest. Agriliances earnings are split among the members based upon the respective economic interests of each member.
Products and Services
CF Industries manufactures crop nutrient products, primarily nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers and potash. Agriliance wholesales crop nutrient products and crop protection products that include insecticides, fungicides, and pesticides. Agriliance also provides field and technical services, including soil testing, adjuvant and herbicide formulation, application and related services.
Sales and Marketing; Customers
CF Industries sells its crop nutrient products to large agricultural cooperatives and distributors. Its largest customers are Land OLakes, CHS and seven other regional cooperatives that wholesale the products to their members. Agriliance distributes agronomy products through approximately 2,200 local cooperatives from Ohio to the West Coast and from the Canadian border south to Kansas. Agriliance also provides sales and services through 48 Agriliance Service Centers and other retail outlets. Agriliances largest customer is the Companys Country Operations and Services business segment. In 2003, Agriliance sold approximately $1.3 billion of crop nutrient products and approximately $1.2 billion of crop protection and other products.
Industry; Competition
CF Industries. North American fertilizer producers operate in a highly competitive, global industry. Commercial fertilizers are world-traded commodities and producers compete principally on the basis of price and service. Many of the raw materials that are used in fertilizer production, such as natural gas, are often more expensive in the U.S. than other parts of the world. Crop nutrient margins and earnings have historically been cyclical; large profits generated throughout the mid-1990s attracted additional capital and expansion and the industry now suffers from excess capacity. These factors have produced depressed margins for North American fertilizer manufacturers over the past several years, although recently fertilizer margins have stabilized.
CF Industries competes with numerous domestic and international crop nutrient manufacturers.
Agriliance. The wholesale distribution of agronomy products is highly competitive and dependent upon relationships with agricultural producers and local cooperatives, proximity to producers and local cooperatives and competitive pricing. Moreover, the crop protection products industry is mature with slow growth predicted for the future, which has led distributors and suppliers to turn to consolidation and strategic partnerships to benefit from economies of scale and increased market share. Agriliance competes with other large agronomy distributors, as well as other regional or local distributors and retailers.
4
Major competitors of Agriliance in crop nutrient distribution include Agrium, Growmark, Cargill, United Suppliers and West Central. Major competitors of Agriliance in crop protection products distribution include Helena, ConAgra (UAP), Tenkoz and numerous smaller distribution companies.
Summary Operating Results
The Company accounts for its Agronomy business segment as follows:
CF Industries. The Companys investment in CF Industries of $153 million on August 31, 2003 is carried on the balance sheet at cost, including allocated patronage. Since CF Industries is a cooperative, the Company recognizes income from the investment only if it receives patronage refunds. Over the past five years CF Industries has realized operating losses and, as a result, it has not issued any patronage refunds to its members. Historically, crop nutrients manufacturing earnings have been cyclical in nature. CHS management has performed the appropriate impairment tests of this investment, and based upon those tests, believes that fair market value exceeds its carrying value. The Company will continue to perform impairment tests annually, including reviewing operating results, or as circumstances dictate, which could result in an impairment to its CF Industries investment.
Agriliance. At August 31, 2003 the Companys equity investment in Agriliance was $129.3 million. The Company recognizes earnings from Agriliance using the equity method of accounting, which results in the Company including its ownership percentage of Agriliances net earnings as equity income from investments. The Company applies related internal expenses against those earnings.
Summary operating results and identifiable assets
for the Agronomy business segment for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are shown below:
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
(84
)
$
(89
)
$
196
(84
)
(89
)
196
8,138
8,957
8,503
(8,222
)
(9,046
)
(8,307
)
(974
)
(1,403
)
(4,529
)
(20,773
)
(13,425
)
(7,360
)
$
13,525
$
5,782
$
3,582
$
285,906
$
242,015
$
230,051
Overview
CHS is the nations largest cooperative energy company, with operations that include petroleum refining and pipelines; the supply, marketing and distribution of refined fuels (gasoline, diesel, and other energy products); the blending, sale and distribution of lubricants; and the wholesale supply of propane. The Energy business segment processes crude oil into refined petroleum products at refineries in Laurel,
5
Operations
Laurel Refinery. The Companys Laurel, Montana refinery processes medium and high sulfur crude oil into refined petroleum products that primarily include gasoline, diesel, and asphalt. The Laurel refinery sources approximately 90% of its crude oil supply from Canada, with the balance obtained from domestic sources. Laurel has access to Canadian and northwest Montana crude through the Companys wholly-owned Front Range Pipeline, LLC and other common carrier pipelines. The Laurel refinery also has access to Wyoming crude via common carrier pipelines from the south.
The Laurel facility processes approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce refined products that consist of approximately 42% gasoline, 30% diesel and other distillates and 28% asphalt and other residual products. Refined fuels produced at Laurel, Montana are available via the Yellowstone Pipeline to western Montana terminals and to Spokane and Moses Lake, Washington, south via common carrier pipelines to Wyoming terminals and Denver, Colorado, and east via the Companys wholly-owned Cenex Pipeline, LLC to Glendive, Montana, and Minot and Fargo, North Dakota.
McPherson Refinery. The McPherson, Kansas refinery is owned and operated by the National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA), of which the Company owns approximately 74.5%. The McPherson refinery processes low and medium sulfur crude oil into gasoline, diesel and other distillates, propane, and other products. McPherson sources approximately 95% of its crude oil from Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas through NCRA-owned and common carrier pipelines.
The McPherson refinery processes approximately 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce refined products that consist of approximately 57% gasoline, 34% diesel and other distillates, and 9% propane and other products. Approximately 90% of the refined fuels are shipped via NCRAs proprietary products pipeline to its terminal in Council Bluffs, Iowa and to other markets via common carrier pipelines. The balance of the fuels are loaded into trucks at the refinery.
Other Energy Operations. The Company owns and operates three propane terminals, four asphalt terminals and three lubricants blending and packaging facilities. The Company also owns and leases a fleet of liquid and pressure trailers and tractors which are used to transport refined fuels, propane and anhydrous ammonia.
Products and Services
The Energy business segment produces and sells (primarily wholesale) gasoline, diesel, propane, asphalt, lubricants and other related products and provides transportation services. It obtains the petroleum products that it sells both from the Laurel and McPherson refineries and from third parties.
Sales and Marketing; Customers
The Company makes approximately 75% of its refined fuel sales to members, with the balance sold to non-members. Sales are made wholesale to member cooperatives and through a network of independent retailers that operate convenience stores under the Cenex/ Ampride tradename. The Company sold approximately 1.5 billion gallons of gasoline and approximately 1.3 billion gallons of diesel fuel in fiscal year 2003. The Company also wholesales auto and farm machinery lubricants to both members and non-members. In fiscal year 2003, energy operations sold approximately 23 million gallons of lube oil. The Company is one of the nations largest propane wholesalers. In fiscal year 2003, energy operations sold approximately 844 million gallons of propane. Most of the propane sold in rural areas is for heating and agricultural consumption. Annual sales volumes of propane vary greatly depending on weather patterns and crop conditions.
6
Industry; Competition
Governmental regulations and policies, particularly in the areas of taxation, energy and the environment, have a significant impact on the Companys Energy business segment. Like many other refineries, the Energy business segments refineries are currently focusing their capital spending on reducing pollution. In particular, these refineries are currently working to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency low sulfur fuel regulations required by 2006, which are intended to lower the sulfur content of gasoline and diesel. The Company currently expects that the cost of compliance will be approximately $87.0 million for the Companys Laurel, Montana refinery and $324.0 million for NCRAs McPherson, Kansas refinery, of which $8.7 million had been spent at the Laurel refinery and $36.5 million had been spent by NCRA at the McPherson refinery as of August 31, 2003. The Company expects all of these compliance capital expenditures at the refineries to be complete by December 31, 2005, and anticipates funding these projects with a combination of cash flows from operations and debt proceeds.
The energy business is highly cyclical. Demand for crude oil and its products are driven by the condition of local and worldwide economies, local and regional weather patterns and taxation relative to other energy sources. Most of the Companys energy product market is located in rural areas, so sales activity tends to follow the planting and harvesting cycles. More fuel efficient equipment, reduced crop tillage, depressed prices for crops, warm winter weather, and government programs which encourage idle acres may all reduce demand for the Companys energy products.
The refining and wholesale fuels business is very competitive. Among the Companys competitors are some of the worlds largest integrated petroleum companies, which have their own crude oil supplies, distribution and marketing systems. The Company also competes with smaller domestic refiners and marketers in the midwestern and northwestern United States, with foreign refiners who import products into the United States and with producers and marketers in other industries supplying other forms of energy and fuels to consumers. Given the commodity nature of the end products, profitability in the refining and marketing industry depends largely on margins, as well as operating efficiency, product mix, and costs of product distribution and transportation. The retail gasoline market is highly competitive, with much larger competitors that have greater brand recognition and distribution outlets throughout the country and the world. CHS owned and non-owned retail outlets are located primarily in the southern, midwestern and northwestern United States.
7
Summary Operating Results
Summary operating results and identifiable assets
for the Energy business segment for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are shown below:
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
3,648,093
$
2,657,689
$
2,781,243
415
458
712
10,461
6,392
4,036
3,658,969
2,664,539
2,785,991
3,475,947
2,489,352
2,549,099
63,740
66,731
48,432
119,282
108,456
188,460
16,401
16,875
25,097
(1,353
)
1,166
4,081
20,782
14,604
34,713
$
83,452
$
75,811
$
124,569
$
1,449,652
$
1,305,828
$
1,154,036
Overview
The Country Operations and Services business segment purchases a variety of grains from the Companys producer members and provides cooperative members and producers with access to a full range of products and services including farm supplies, programs for crop and livestock production, hedging and insurance services, and agricultural operations financing. Country Operations and Services operates at 282 locations dispersed throughout Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon. Most of these locations purchase grain from farmers and sell agronomy products, energy products and feed to those same producers and others, although not all locations provide every product and service.
Products and Services
Grain Purchasing. The Company is one of the largest country elevator operators in North America. Through a majority of its elevator locations, the Country Operations and Services business segment purchases grain from member and non-member producers and other elevators and grain dealers. Most of the grain purchased is either sold through the Companys Grain Marketing business segment or used for local feed and processing operations. For the year ended August 31, 2003, the Country Operations and Services business segment purchased approximately 298 million bushels of grain, primarily wheat (136 million bushels), corn (79 million bushels) and soybeans (46 million bushels). Of these bushels, 274 million were purchased from members and 204 million were sold through the Grain Marketing business segment.
Other Products. Country Operations and Services manufactures and sells other products, both directly and through ownership interests in other entities. These include seed; plant food; energy products; animal feed ingredients, supplements and products; animal health products; crop protection products; and processed sunflowers. The Company sells agronomy products at 155 locations, feed products at 128 locations and energy products at 93 locations. Farm supplies are purchased through cooperatives whenever possible.
8
Financial Services. The Company has provided open account financing to more than 150 CHS members that are cooperatives (cooperative association members) in the past year. These arrangements involve the discretionary extension of credit in the form of term and seasonal loans and can also be used as a clearing account for settlement of grain purchases and as a cash management tool. A substantial part of the term and seasonal loans are sold to the National Bank for Cooperatives (CoBank), with CoBank purchasing up to 90% of any loan. The Companys guarantee exposure on these loans at August 31, 2003 was approximately $6.7 million. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Fin-Ag, Inc. the Company provides seasonal cattle feeding and swine financing loans, facility financing loans and crop production loans. It also provides consulting services to member cooperatives. Most loans are sold to CoBank under a separate program from that described above, under which the Company has guaranteed a portion of the loans. The Companys exposure at August 31, 2003 was approximately $43.0 million. The Companys borrowing arrangements allow for the Company to retain up to $110.0 million of loans in aggregate for both finance programs, or to sell the loans and extend guarantees up to $150.0 million in aggregate.
The Companys wholly-owned subsidiary Country Hedging, Inc., which is a registered futures commission merchant and a clearing member of both the Minneapolis Grain Exchange and the Kansas City Board of Trade, is a full service commodity futures and options broker.
Ag States Agency, LLC is an independent insurance agency in which the Company holds a majority ownership interest. It sells insurance, including group benefits, property and casualty, and bonding programs. Its approximately 1,600 customers are primarily agricultural businesses, including local cooperatives and independent elevators, oil stations, agronomy and feed/seed plants, implement dealers, fruit and vegetable packers/warehouses, and food processors.
Industry; Competition
Competitors for the purchase of grain include other elevators and large grain marketing companies. Competitors for farm supply include a variety of cooperatives, privately held and large national companies. The Company competes primarily on the basis of price, services and patronage.
Competitors to the Companys financing operations are primarily other financial institutions. The Company competes primarily on the basis of price, services and patronage. Country Hedgings competitors include international brokerage firms, national brokerage firms, regional brokerage firms (both cooperatives and non-cooperatives) as well as local introducing brokers, with competition driven by price and level of service. Ag States competes with other insurance agencies, primarily on the basis of price and services.
9
Summary Operating Results
Summary operating results and identifiable assets
for the Country Operations and Services business segment for the
fiscal years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are shown
below:
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
1,885,825
$
1,474,553
$
1,577,268
2,467
2,572
3,683
81,739
80,789
80,479
1,970,031
1,557,914
1,661,430
1,876,811
1,474,392
1,569,884
55,887
47,995
53,417
37,333
35,527
38,129
(10,867
)
(2,970
)
14,975
13,851
15,695
(788
)
(283
)
(246
)
1,168
786
385
$
32,845
$
24,143
$
22,295
$
857,523
$
799,711
$
679,053
Overview
CHS is the nations largest cooperative marketer of grain and oilseed, handling about 1.1 billion bushels annually. During fiscal year 2003, the Company purchased approximately 67% of total grain volumes from individual and member cooperatives and the Country Operations and Services business segment, with the balance purchased from third parties. CHS arranges for the transportation of the grains either directly to customers or to Company owned or leased grain terminals and elevators awaiting delivery to domestic and foreign purchasers. The Company primarily conducts its Grain Marketing operations directly, but does conduct some of its business through two 50% owned joint ventures.
Operations
The Grain Marketing segment purchases grain directly and indirectly from agricultural producers primarily in the midwestern and western United States. The purchased grain is typically contracted for sale for future delivery at a specified location, with the Company responsible for handling the grain and arranging for its transportation to that location. The sale of grain is recorded after title to the commodity has transferred and final weights, grades and settlement price have been agreed upon. Amounts billed to the customer as part of a sales transaction include the costs for shipping and handling. The Companys ability to arrange efficient transportation, including loading capabilities onto unit trains, ocean-going vessels, and barges, is a significant part of the service it offers to its customers. Rail, vessel, barge and truck transportation is carried out by third parties, often under long-term freight agreements with the Company. Grain intended for export is usually shipped by rail or barge to an export terminal, where it is loaded onto ocean-going vessels. Grain intended for domestic use is usually shipped by rail or truck to various locations throughout the country.
CHS owns export terminals, river terminals, and elevators involved in the handling and transport of grain. River terminals at St. Paul, Savage, and Winona, Minnesota, and Davenport, Iowa are used to load grains onto barges for shipment to both domestic and export customers via the Mississippi River System.
10
Grain Marketing purchases most of its grain during the summer and fall harvest period. Because of the Companys geographic location and the fact that it is further from its export facilities, grain tends to be sold later than in other parts of the country. However, as many producers have significant on-farm storage capacity and in light of the Companys own storage capacity, the Grain Marketing business segment buys and ships grain throughout the year. Due to the amount of grain purchased and held in inventory, the Grain Marketing business segment has significant working capital needs at various times of the year. The amount of borrowings for this purpose, and the interest rate charged on those borrowings, directly affect the profitability of the Grain Marketing segment.
Products and Services
The primary grains purchased by the Grain Marketing business segment for the year ended August 31, 2003 were corn (412 million bushels), wheat (329 million bushels) and soybeans (245 million bushels). Of the total grains purchased by the Grain Marketing business segment during the year ended August 31, 2003, 508 million bushels were purchased from the Companys individual and cooperative association members, 204 million bushels were purchased from the Country Operations and Services business segment and the remainder were purchased from third parties.
Sales and Marketing; Customers
Purchasers include domestic and foreign millers, maltsters, feeders, crushers, and other processors. To a much lesser extent purchasers include intermediaries and distributors. Grain Marketing operations are not dependent on any one customer. The Grain Marketing segment has supply relationships calling for delivery of grain at prevailing market prices.
Industry; Competition
The Grain Marketing business segment competes for both the purchase and sale of grain. Competition is intense and margins are low. Some competitors are integrated food producers, which may also be customers. A few major competitors have substantially greater financial resources than the Company.
In the purchase of grain from producers, location of the delivery facility is a prime consideration, but producers are increasingly willing to truck grain longer distances for sale. Price is affected by the capabilities of the facility; for example, if it is cheaper to deliver to a customer by unit train than by truck, a facility with unit train capability provides a price advantage. The Company believes that its relationships with individual members serviced by local Country Operations and Services locations and with cooperative members gives it a broad origination capability.
The Grain Marketing business segment competes for grain sales based on price, services and ability to provide the desired quantity and quality of grains. Location of facilities is a major factor in the ability to compete. Grain marketing operations compete with numerous grain merchandisers, including major grain merchandising companies such as Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill), ConAgra, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus, each of which handle grain volumes of more than one billion bushels annually.
11
The results of the grain marketing business may
be adversely affected by relative levels of supply and demand,
both domestic and international, commodity price levels
(including grain prices reported on national markets) and
transportation costs and conditions. Supply is affected by
weather conditions, disease, insect damage, acreage planted and
government regulations and policies. Demand may be affected by
foreign governments and their programs, relationships of foreign
countries with the United States, the affluence of foreign
countries, acts of war, currency exchange fluctuations and
substitution of commodities. Demand may also be affected by
changes in eating habits, by population growth, and by increased
or decreased per capita consumption of some products.
Summary Operating Results
Summary operating results and identifiable assets
for the Grain Marketing business segment for the fiscal years
ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are shown below:
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
4,139,226
$
3,281,469
$
3,416,239
218
497
840
25,458
21,902
22,964
4,164,902
3,303,868
3,440,043
4,133,677
3,272,985
3,416,500
21,072
22,213
22,396
10,153
8,670
1,147
4,738
4,807
8,144
1,673
(4,257
)
(4,519
)
$
3,742
$
8,120
$
(2,478
)
$
450,415
$
481,232
$
345,696
Overview
The Processed Grains and Foods business segment converts raw agricultural commodities into ingredients for finished food products or into finished consumer food products. The Company has focused on areas that allow it to utilize the products supplied by member producers. These areas are oilseed processing, wheat milling and foods.
Oilseed Processing
The Companys oilseed processing operations convert soybeans into soybean meal, soyflour, crude soyoil, refined soybean oil and associated by-products. These operations are conducted at a facility in Mankato, Minnesota that can crush 39 million bushels of soybeans on an annual basis, producing approximately 940,000 short tons of soybean meal and 460 million pounds of crude soybean oil. The same facility is able to produce approximately 1 billion pounds of refined soybean oil annually. Another crushing facility in Fairmont, Minnesota has a crushing capacity and crude soyoil output similar to the Mankato facility. The facility in Fairmont was essentially complete and became operational in the first fiscal quarter of 2004. Total costs for this new facility are estimated to be approximately $85.0 million, of which $68.9 million has been spent through August 31, 2003.
The Companys oilseed processing operations produce three primary products: refined oils, soybean meal and soyflour. Refined oils are used in processed foods, such as margarine, shortening, salad dressings
12
The Companys soy processing facilities are located in areas with a strong production base of soybeans and end-user market for the meal and soyflour. The Company purchases virtually all of its soybeans from members. The oilseed crushing operations currently produce approximately 45% of the crude oil that the Company refines; it purchases the balance from outside suppliers. Once the Fairmount, Minnesota crushing facility is fully operational, the oilseed crushing operations will produce approximately 85% of the crude oil the Company refines.
The Companys customers for refined oil are principally large food product companies located throughout the United States. However, over 50% of the customers are located in the midwest due to lower freight costs and slightly higher profitability. The largest customer for refined oil products is Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods), in which the Company holds a 50% ownership interest and with which the Company has a long-term supply agreement to supply minimum quantities of edible soybean oils as long as the Company maintains a minimum 25.5% ownership interest and the Companys price is comparative with other suppliers of the product. The Companys sales to Ventura Foods were $78.5 million in fiscal year 2003. The Company also sells soymeal to almost 400 customers, primarily feed lots and feed mills in southern Minnesota; five of these customers accounted for approximately 58% of the soymeal sold. Land OLakes/ Farmland Feed, LLC accounts for 25% of soymeal sold and Commodity Specialists Company accounts for 12% of soymeal sold. The Company sells soyflour to customers in the baking industry both domestically and for export.
The refined soybean products industry is highly competitive. Major industry competitors include ADM, Cargill, Ag Processing, Inc., and Bunge. These and other competitors have acquired other processors and have expanded existing plants, or are proposing to construct new plants, both domestically and internationally. Price, transportation costs, services and product quality drive competition. The Company estimates that it has a market share of approximately 4% to 5% of the domestic refined soybean oil market and less than 3% of the domestic soybean crushing capacity.
Soybeans are a commodity and their price can fluctuate significantly depending on production levels, demand for the refined products, and other supply and demand factors.
Wheat Milling
In January 2002, the Company and Cargill formed Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling), in which the Company owns 24% and Cargill owns the remaining 76%. Horizon Milling is the largest U.S. wheat miller. Sales and purchases of wheat and durum by the Company to Horizon Milling during fiscal year 2003 were $191.3 million and $8.8 million, respectively. Horizon Millings advance payments on grain to the Company were $7.5 million on August 31, 2003, and are included in Customer advance payments on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company ceased operations at its Huron, Ohio mill prior to the formation of Horizon Milling and the Companys facility lease expired on September 30, 2002. The Company has dismantled the milling equipment and is currently negotiating for the sale of the equipment that has not yet been sold. The Processed Grains and Foods business segment established an impairment of approximately $6.5 million on the equipment during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002.
Foods
The Company has two primary areas of focus in the foods area: Ventura Foods, which produces oilseed based products such as margarine and salad dressing and which is 50% owned by the Company, and the production of Mexican foods such as tortillas, tortilla chips and entrees.
Ventura Foods. Ventura Foods manufactures, packages, distributes and markets bulk margarine, salad dressings, mayonnaise, salad oils, syrups, soup bases and sauces, many of which utilize soybean oil as
13
Ventura Foods has 13 manufacturing and distribution locations across the United States. It sources its raw materials, which consists primarily of soybean oil, canola oil, cottonseed oil, peanut oil and various other ingredients and supplies, from various national suppliers, including the Companys oilseed processing and refining operations. It sells the products it manufactures to third parties as a contract manufacturer, as well as directly to retailers, food distribution companies and large institutional food service companies. Ventura Foods sales are approximately 65% in foodservice and the remainder split between retail and industrial customers who use edible oil products as ingredients in foods they manufacture for resale.
Ventura Foods competes with a variety of large companies in the food manufacturing industry. Some of its major competitors are ADM, Cargill, Bunge, Unilever, ConAgra, ACH, Smuckers, Kraft, and CF Sauer.
Ventura Foods was created in 1996 and at the time was owned 40% by the Company and 60% by Wilsey Foods, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. In March 2000, the Company purchased an additional 10% interest from Wilsey Foods, Inc. bringing the Companys total equity investment in Ventura Foods to 50%. The Company accounts for the Ventura Foods investment under the equity method of accounting.
Mexican Foods. Since June 2000, the Company has acquired three regional producers of Mexican foods. Through its Mexican foods operations, the Company manufactures, packages, and distributes tortillas, tortilla chips and prepared frozen Mexican food products such as burritos and tamales. The Company sells these products under a variety of local and regional brand names and also produces private label products and co-packs for customers. The current operational focus is on integrating these disparate operations into a single business entity with consistent standards, systems and sales practices.
The tortilla and tortilla chip industry in the United States is comprised of a large number of small regional manufacturers and a few dominant manufacturers. The Company estimates that its Mexican foods operation has approximately a 1.5% share of the national tortilla market and less than a 1% share of the national tortilla chip market. On a national basis, the primary competitors are large chip and snack companies such as Frito Lay.
14
Summary Operating Results
Summary operating results and identifiable assets
for the Processed Grains and Foods business segment for the
fiscal years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are shown
below:
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
491,931
$
496,084
$
662,726
111
260
339
2,300
(1,469
)
(238
)
494,342
494,875
662,827
466,857
457,538
619,184
36,540
36,930
44,870
(9,055
)
407
(1,227
)
12,845
9,514
13,026
(26,056
)
(41,331
)
(35,505
)
$
4,156
$
32,224
$
21,252
$
498,872
$
439,942
$
430,871
* | The sales decline from 2001 is primarily due to the formation of Horizon Milling. Since January 2002 the Company has accounted for the operating results of its milling operations under the equity method of accounting. Earnings from the Companys interest in Horizon Milling are included as part of equity income from investments. |
Whenever the Company enters into a commodity purchase commitment it incurs risks of carrying inventory, including risks related to price changes and performance (including delivery, quality, quantity and shipment period). The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the market value of positions held, consisting of inventory and purchase contracts at a fixed or partially fixed price in the event market prices decrease. The Company is also exposed to risk of loss on its fixed price or partially fixed price sales contracts in the event market prices increase.
To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commitments, the Company generally takes opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight futures contract or an options futures contract) on regulated commodity futures exchanges for grain, and regulated mercantile exchanges for refined products and crude oil. The crude oil and most of the grain and oilseed volume handled by the Company can be hedged. Some grains cannot be hedged because there are no futures for certain commodities. For those commodities, risk is managed through the use of forward sales and various pricing arrangements and to some extent cross-commodity futures hedging. While hedging activities reduce the risk of loss from changing market values of inventory, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from changes in market prices of inventory. The Companys policy is to generally maintain hedged positions in grain. The Companys profitability from operations is primarily derived from margins on products sold and grain merchandised, not from hedging transactions. Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance of a contract.
When a futures contract is entered into, an initial margin deposit must be sent to the applicable exchange or broker. The amount of the deposit is set by the exchange and varies by commodity. If the market price of a short futures contract increases, then an additional margin deposit (maintenance margin) would be required. Similarly, if the price of a long futures contract decreases, a maintenance margin
15
At any one time, inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to the Company may be substantial. The Company has risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. These limits are defined for each commodity and include both trader and management limits. This policy, and computerized procedures in grain marketing operations, requires a review by operations management when any trader is outside of position limits and also a review by senior management of the Company if operating areas are outside of position limits. A similar process is used in energy operations. The position limits are reviewed at least annually with the management of the Company. The Company monitors current market conditions and may expand or reduce its risk management policies or procedures in response to changes in those conditions. In addition, all purchase and sale contracts are subject to credit approvals and appropriate terms and conditions.
At August 31, 2003, CHS had approximately 6,820 full and part-time employees, which included approximately 560 employees of NCRA. Of that total, approximately 1,890 were employed in the Energy segment, 2,440 in the Country Operations and Services segment (not including an estimated 1,010 seasonal and temporary employees), 440 in the Grain Marketing segment, 850 in the Processed Grains and Foods business segment and 190 in corporate and administrative functions. In addition to those employed directly by the Company, many employees work for the joint ventures in which the Company has an ownership interest. All of the employees in the Agronomy segment and a portion of the Grain Marketing and Processed Grains and Foods segments are employed in this manner.
Employees in certain areas are represented by collective bargaining agreements. Refinery workers in Laurel, Montana (185 employees), are represented by agreements with two unions (Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union (PACE) and Oil Basin Pipeliners Union (OBP)), for which agreements are in place through 2006 for PACE, and through 2006 for OBP in regard to wages and benefits. The contracts covering the NCRA McPherson, Kansas refinery (254 employees in the PACE union) are also in place through 2006. There are approximately 170 employees in transportation and lubricant plant operations that are covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire at various times. Production workers in grain marketing operations (144 employees) are represented by agreements with four unions which expire at various times from 2003 through 2005. In particular, grain marketing employees in the Bakers, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union in Superior, Wisconsin (49 employees) have contracts that have expired and are currently being negotiated, with the Company anticipating a successful resolution. Finally, certain production workers in oilseed processing operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements with the American Federation of Grain Millers (127 employees) and the Pipefitters Union (2 employees) for which agreements are in place through 2006.
Introduction
The Company is an agricultural membership cooperative organized under Minnesota cooperative law to do business with member and non-member patrons. Patrons, and not the Company, are subject to income taxes on income from patronage. The Company is subject to income taxes on non-patronage-sourced income. See Tax Treatment below.
Distribution of Net Income; Patronage Dividends
The Company is required by its organizational documents annually to distribute net earnings derived from patronage business with members, after payment of dividends on equity capital, to members on the basis of patronage, except that the Board of Directors may elect to retain and add to the Companys
16
These distributions, referred to as patronage dividends, may be distributed in cash, patrons equities, revolving fund certificates, securities of the Company or others or any combination designated by the Board of Directors. Since 1998, the Board of Directors has distributed patronage dividends in the form of 30% cash and 70% patrons equities (see Patrons Equities below). The Board of Directors may change the mix in the form of the patronage dividend in the future. In making distributions, the Board of Directors may use any method of allocation that, in its judgment, is reasonable and equitable. Patronage dividends distributed during the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $88.3 million ($26.5 million in cash), $132.6 million ($40.1 million in cash) and $86.4 million ($26.1 million in cash), respectively.
Patrons Equities
Patrons equities are in the form of a book entry and represent a right to receive cash when redeemed by the Company. Patrons equities form part of the capital of the Company, do not bear interest and are not subject to redemption upon request of a member. Patrons equities are redeemable only at the discretion of the Board of Directors and in accordance with the terms of the redemption policy adopted by the Board of Directors, which may be modified at any time without member consent. The Companys current policy is to redeem the equities of those members who were age 61 and older on June 1, 1998 when they reach the age of 72 and upon death. The current policy also provides for an annual pro-rata redemption of equities older than 10 years held by active members in an amount determined by the Board of Directors.
Redemptions of patrons and other equities, including equity participation units (discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), during the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $31.1 million, $31.1 million and $33.0 million, respectively.
Governance
The Company is managed by a Board of Directors of at least 17 persons elected by the members at the Companys annual meeting. Terms of Directors are staggered so that no more than seven directors are elected in any year. The Board of Directors is currently comprised of 17 directors. The articles of incorporation and bylaws of the Company may be amended only upon approval of a majority of the votes cast at an annual or special meeting of the members, except for the higher vote described under Certain Antitakeover Measures below.
Membership
Membership in the Company is restricted to certain producers of agricultural products and to associations of producers of agricultural products that are organized and operating so as to adhere to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act, as amended. The Board of Directors may establish other qualifications for membership as it may from time to time deem advisable.
As a membership cooperative, the Company does not have common stock. The Company may issue equity or debt securities, on a patronage basis or otherwise, to its members. The Company has two classes of outstanding membership. Individual members are individuals actually engaged in the production of agricultural products. Cooperative associations are associations of agricultural producers, either cooperatives or other associations organized and operated under the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act.
17
Voting Rights
Voting rights arise by virtue of membership in the Company, not because of ownership of any equity or debt security. Members that are cooperative associations are entitled to vote based upon a formula that takes into account the equity held by the cooperative in the Company and the average amount of business done with the Company over the previous three years.
Members who are individuals are entitled to one vote. Individual members may exercise their voting power directly or through a patrons association associated with a grain elevator, feed mill, seed plant or any other Company facility (with certain historical exceptions) recognized by the Board of Directors. The number of votes of patrons associations is determined under the same formula as cooperative association members.
Most matters submitted to a vote of the members require the approval of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the members, although the approval of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting is required to approve Change of Control transactions, which include a merger, consolidation, liquidation, dissolution, or the sale of all or substantially all of the Companys assets and, in certain circumstances, a greater vote may be required. See Certain Antitakeover Measures below.
Debt and Equity Instruments
The Company may issue debt and equity instruments to its current members and patrons, on a patronage basis or otherwise, and to persons who are neither members nor patrons. Equity issued by the Company is subject to a first lien in favor of the Company for all indebtedness of the holder to the Company. As of August 31, 2003, the Companys outstanding capital included patrons equities (consisting of capital equity certificates and non-patronage earnings certificates), 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (dividends paid quarterly) and certain capital reserves.
Distribution of Assets Upon Dissolution; Merger and Consolidation
In the event of any dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, all debts and liabilities would be paid first according to their respective priorities. As more particularly provided in the Companys bylaws, the remaining assets would be paid to the holders of equity capital to the extent of their interests and any excess would be paid to patrons on the basis of their past patronage. The bylaws provide for the allocation among the members and nonmember patrons of the consideration received in any merger or consolidation to which the Company is a party.
Certain Antitakeover Measures
The Companys governing documents may be amended upon the approval of a majority of the votes cast at an annual or special meeting. However, if the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, declares that a proposed amendment to the Companys governing documents involves or is related to a hostile takeover, the amendment must be adopted by 80% of the total voting power of the members of the Company. Further, if the Board of Directors determines that a proposed change of control transaction involves a hostile takeover, the 80% approval requirement applies. The term hostile takeover is not further defined in the Minnesota cooperative law or the governing documents of the Company.
Tax Treatment
Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code sets forth rules for the tax treatment of cooperatives and applies to both cooperatives exempt from taxation under Section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code and to nonexempt corporations operating on a cooperative basis. The Company is a nonexempt cooperative.
As a cooperative, the Company is not taxed on patronage paid to its members either in the form of equities or cash. Consequently, such amounts are taxed only at the patron level. However, the amounts of any allocated but undistributed patronage earnings (called non-qualified unit retains) are taxable to the
18
Income derived by the Company from non-patronage sources is not entitled to the single tax benefit of Subchapter T and is taxed to the Company at corporate income tax rates.
NCRA is not consolidated for tax purposes.
The Company owns or leases energy, grain handling
and processing, food manufacturing and agronomy related
facilities throughout the United States. Below is a summary of
these locations.
Energy
Facilities in the Companys Energy business
segment include the following, all of which are owned except
where indicated as leased:
Laurel, Montana
3 locations in Minnesota, North Dakota and
Wisconsin
10 locations in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Washington and Wisconsin, 2 of which are
leased
9 locations in Montana, North Dakota and Wisconsin
10 locations in Montana and North Dakota
Laurel, Montana to Fargo, North Dakota
Canadian Border to Laurel, Montana
33 locations in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South
Dakota and Wyoming
3 locations in Minnesota, Ohio and Texas
The Company has a 74.5% interest in NCRA, which
owns and operates the following facilities:
McPherson, Kansas
2 locations in Iowa and Kansas
McPherson, Kansas to Council Bluffs, Iowa
Throughout Kansas, with branches in Oklahoma and
Texas
40 locations located in Kansas and Oklahoma
Grain Marketing
The Company owns or leases grain terminals used in the Grain Marketing business segment at the following locations:
Davenport, Iowa (2 owned terminals) | |
Kalama, Washington (leased) | |
Kansas City, Missouri (leased) | |
Minneapolis, Minnesota (owned idle terminal) | |
Myrtle Grove, Louisiana (owned) | |
St. Paul, Minnesota (leased) | |
Savage, Minnesota (owned) | |
Spokane, Washington (owned) | |
Superior, Wisconsin (owned) | |
Winona, Minnesota (1 owned, 1 leased) |
19
Country Operations and Services
In the Country Operations and Services business segment the Company owns 282 agri operations locations (of which some of the facilities are on leased land), 8 feed manufacturing facilities and 2 sunflower plants located in Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Washington, Oregon and Idaho.
Processed Grains and Foods
Within the Processed Grains and Foods business segment, the Company owns and leases the following facilities:
Oilseed Processing |
The Company owns a campus in Mankato, Minnesota, comprised of a crushing plant, an oilseed refinery, a soyflour plant and a quality control laboratory. A crushing plant in Fairmont, Minnesota previously under construction was essentially complete and became operational during the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2003.
Wheat Milling |
The Company owns five flour milling facilities at the following locations that are leased to Horizon Milling, LLC:
Rush City, Minnesota | |
Kenosha, Wisconsin | |
Houston, Texas | |
Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania | |
Fairmount, North Dakota |
Foods |
The Company leases manufacturing facilities in New Brighton, Minnesota, Ft. Worth, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona. In addition, the Company owns two manufacturing facilities in Ft. Worth, Texas. A new facility is currently under construction near Newton, North Carolina, which the Company expects to complete during its fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2003. The Company originally intended to use the facility for manufacturing upon completion of construction, but at this time the Company expects to sell or lease it. All facilities are related to the Companys Mexican foods operations.
Corporate Headquarters
The Company is headquartered in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. The Company owns a 33-acre campus consisting of one main building with approximately 320,000 square feet of office space and two smaller buildings with approximately 13,400 and 9,000 square feet of space.
The Companys internet address is www.chsinc.com.
The Company is involved as a defendant in various lawsuits, claims and disputes which are in the normal course of the Companys business. The resolution of any such matters may affect consolidated net income for any fiscal period; however, management believes any resulting liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company during any fiscal year.
In October 2003, the Company and NCRA reached agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Montanas Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment, respectively, regarding the terms of settlements with respect to
20
The Company held a special meeting on August 5, 2003 where results of a mail ballot were counted to change the Companys legal name to CHS Inc. Fifty percent of CHS members, consisting of cooperatives and producers in 27 states, participated in the vote; of these, eighty-seven percent of members voted in favor of the legal name change, which needed a simple majority of the members voting for passage.
21
The Company has approximately 51,100 members, of which approximately 1,100 are cooperative association members and approximately 50,000 are individual members. As a cooperative, the Company does not have any common equity that is traded.
On August 31, 2003 the Company had 3,748,099 shares of 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding, which is listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CHSCP.
The Company sold no equity securities during the three years ended August 31, 2003 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On April 25, 2003, the Company issued 298,099 shares of its 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the New Shares) on conversion of 7,452,439 then-outstanding shares of 8% Preferred Stock (the Old Shares). The New Shares were exchanged by the Company with its existing security holders (the holders of the Old Shares) exclusively and no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting the exchange. Accordingly, the Company relied on the exemption from registration contained in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of the New Shares and did not file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchanges Commission with respect to that issuance.
The selected financial information below has been
derived from the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the years ended August 31. The selected
consolidated financial information for August 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001 should be read in conjunction with the
Companys consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this filing.
Summary Consolidated Financial Data
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(dollars in thousands)
$
9,270,734
$
7,156,454
$
7,464,242
$
8,248,413
$
6,198,843
3,257
3,885
5,977
5,494
5,876
124,542
109,459
116,254
97,471
81,180
9,398,533
7,269,798
7,586,473
8,351,378
6,285,899
9,058,951
6,940,926
7,181,433
8,051,057
6,010,796
190,582
187,292
184,046
155,266
152,031
149,000
141,580
220,994
145,055
123,072
(10,867
)
(2,970
)
48,675
42,455
61,436
57,566
42,438
(47,299
)
(58,133
)
(28,494
)
(28,325
)
(22,363
)
21,950
15,390
35,098
24,546
10,017
136,541
144,838
152,954
91,268
92,980
12,700
18,700
(25,600
)
3,880
6,980
$
123,841
$
126,138
$
178,554
$
87,388
$
86,000
22
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(dollars in thousands)
$
458,738
$
249,115
$
305,280
$
214,223
$
219,045
1,122,982
1,057,421
1,023,872
1,034,768
968,333
3,807,968
3,481,727
3,057,319
3,172,680
2,787,664
663,173
572,124
559,997
510,500
482,666
1,481,711
1,289,638
1,261,153
1,164,426
1,117,636
The selected financial statement information
below has been derived from the Companys five business
segments, and Corporate and Other, for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. The intercompany sales
between segments were $894.3 million, $753.3 million
and $973.2 million for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Summary Financial Data By Business
Segment
Agronomy
Energy
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
3,648,093
$
2,657,689
$
2,781,243
$
(84
)
$
(89
)
$
196
415
458
712
10,461
6,392
4,036
(84
)
(89
)
196
3,658,969
2,664,539
2,785,991
3,475,947
2,489,352
2,549,099
8,138
8,957
8,503
63,740
66,731
48,432
(8,222
)
(9,046
)
(8,307
)
119,282
108,456
188,460
(974
)
(1,403
)
(4,529
)
16,401
16,875
25,097
(20,773
)
(13,425
)
(7,360
)
(1,353
)
1,166
4,081
20,782
14,604
34,713
$
13,525
$
5,782
$
3,582
$
83,452
$
75,811
$
124,569
$
285,906
$
242,015
$
230,051
$
1,449,652
$
1,305,828
$
1,154,036
23
Country Operations and Services
Grain Marketing
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
1,885,825
$
1,474,553
$
1,577,268
$
4,139,226
$
3,281,469
$
3,416,239
2,467
2,572
3,683
218
497
840
81,739
80,789
80,479
25,458
21,902
22,964
1,970,031
1,557,914
1,661,430
4,164,902
3,303,868
3,440,043
1,876,811
1,474,392
1,569,884
4,133,677
3,272,985
3,416,500
55,887
47,995
53,417
21,072
22,213
22,396
37,333
35,527
38,129
10,153
8,670
1,147
(10,867
)
(2,970
)
14,975
13,851
15,695
4,738
4,807
8,144
(788
)
(283
)
(246
)
1,673
(4,257
)
(4,519
)
1,168
786
385
$
32,845
$
24,143
$
22,295
$
3,742
$
8,120
$
(2,478
)
$
857,523
$
799,711
$
679,053
$
450,415
$
481,232
$
345,696
Processed Grains and Foods
Corporate and Other
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
491,931
$
496,084
$
662,726
111
260
339
$
130
$
187
$
207
2,300
(1,469
)
(238
)
4,584
1,845
9,013
494,342
494,875
662,827
4,714
2,032
9,220
466,857
457,538
619,184
36,540
36,930
44,870
5,205
4,466
6,428
(9,055
)
407
(1,227
)
(491
)
(2,434
)
2,792
12,845
9,514
13,026
690
(1,189
)
4,003
(26,056
)
(41,331
)
(35,505
)
(2
)
(3
)
15,055
$
4,156
$
32,224
$
21,252
$
(1,179
)
$
(1,242
)
$
(16,266
)
$
498,872
$
439,942
$
430,871
$
265,600
$
212,999
$
217,612
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
CHS Inc. (CHS or the Company) is one of the nations leading integrated agricultural companies. As a cooperative, the Company is owned by farmers, ranchers and their local cooperatives from the Great Lakes to the Pacific Northwest and from the Canadian border to Texas. CHS buys commodities from, and provides products and services to members and other customers. The Company provides a wide variety of products and services, from initial agricultural inputs such as fuels, farm supplies and crop nutrients, to agricultural outputs that include grains and oilseeds, grain and oilseed processing, and food products.
The Company has five distinct business segments: Agronomy, Energy, Country Operations and Services, Grain Marketing and Processed Grains and Foods. Summary data for each of these segments for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is shown on prior pages.
Many of the Companys business activities are highly seasonal, and as a result, operating results will vary throughout the year. Overall, the Companys income is generally lowest during the second fiscal
24
The Companys revenue can be significantly affected by global market prices for commodities such as petroleum products, natural gas, grain, oilseeds and flour. Changes in market prices for commodities that the Company purchases without a corresponding change in the selling prices of those products can affect revenues and operating earnings. Commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond the Companys control, including the weather, crop damage due to disease or insects, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulation and policies, world events, and general political and economic conditions.
While the Companys sales and operating results are derived from businesses and operations which are wholly-owned and majority-owned, a portion of business operations are conducted through companies in which the Company holds ownership interests of 50% or less and does not control the operations. The Company accounts for these investments primarily using the equity method of accounting, wherein CHS records as equity income from investments its proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in the Companys consolidated statements of operations. These investments principally include the Companys 25% ownership in Agriliance, LLC (Agriliance), the 50% ownership in TEMCO, LLC, the 50% ownership in United Harvest, LLC, the 24% ownership in Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon) and the 50% ownership in Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura).
Agriliance is owned and governed by Land OLakes, Inc. (50%) and United Country Brands, LLC (50%). United Country Brands, LLC is owned and governed 50% by the Company and 50% by Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland), and was formed solely to hold a 50% interest in Agriliance. Prior to the transaction described below, the Companys indirect share of earnings (economic interest) in Agriliance was 25%, which was the same as the Companys ownership or governance interest. Subsequent to the transaction, the Companys indirect economic interest in Agriliance is no longer the same as the Companys ownership or governance interest.
In April 2003, the Company acquired an additional
economic interest in the Agriliance wholesale crop protection
business (the CPP Business), which constitutes only
a part of the Agriliance business operations. The Company
acquired 13.1% of the CPP Business for a cash payment of
$34.3 million. The economic interests in Agriliance are
owned 50% by Land OLakes, 25% plus an additional 13.1% of
the CPP Business by the Company and 25% less 13.1% of the CPP
Business by Farmland. The ownership or governance interests in
Agriliance did not change with the purchase of this additional
economic interest. Agriliances earnings are split among
the members based upon the respective economic interests of each
member.
Results of Operations
Net Income.
Consolidated net income for the year ended August 31, 2003
was $123.8 million compared to $126.1 million for the
year ended August 31, 2002, which represents a
$2.3 million (2%) decrease. This decrease in profitability
is primarily attributable to decreased earnings in the
Companys Processed Grains and Foods and Grain Marketing
segments, which was partially offset by increased earnings
within the Energy, Country Operations and Services and Agronomy
segments compared to the year ended August 31, 2002.
25
Net Sales.
Consolidated net sales of
$9.3 billion for the year ended August 31, 2003
increased $2.1 billion (30%) compared to the year ended
August 31, 2002.
Company-wide grain and oilseed net sales of
$4.5 billion increased $1.0 billion (30%) during the
year ended August 31, 2003 compared to the year ended
August 31, 2002. Sales for the year ended August 31,
2003 were $4,139.2 million and $1,140.0 million from
Grain Marketing and Country Operations and Services segments,
respectively. Sales for the year ended August 31, 2002 were
$3,281.5 million and $862.0 million from Grain
Marketing and Country Operations and Services segments,
respectively. The Company eliminated all intersegment sales
between Country Operations and Services and Grain Marketing, of
$799.4 million and $685.4 million, for the years ended
August 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The net increase in
sales was primarily due to an increase of $0.93 (30%) per bushel
in the average sales price of all grain and oilseed marketed by
the Company while volumes remained essentially unchanged from
the prior year. The net increase in company-wide grain and
oilseed of $1.0 billion was primarily related to the price
change due to stronger commodity prices and increased
international soybean exports.
Energy net sales of $3.6 billion increased
$963.6 million (37%) during the year ended August 31,
2003 compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. Sales for
the year ended August 31, 2003 and 2002 were
$3,648.1 million and $2,657.7 million, respectively.
The Company eliminated all intersegment sales from Energy to
Country Operations and Services of $94.2 million and
$67.4 million for the years ended August 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Refined fuels net sales increased by
$783.2 million, of which $418.0 million was related to
a net average price change and $365.2 million was related
to a net volume change. The sales price of refined fuels
increased $0.18 per gallon and volume increased 17%
compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. Refined fuels
commodity prices increased due to global uncertainty in the
energy markets brought on by the ensuing war and the Venezuela
disruption. Propane net sales increased by $137.0 million,
of which $75.9 million was related to a net volume change
and $61.1 million was related to a net average price
change. The average sales price of propane increased by $0.09
per gallon and volume increased by 19% compared to the year
ended August 31, 2002. Domestic propane inventories were at
extremely low levels coming out of the heating season, which
supported a higher selling price. Refined fuels and propane
volume increases were primarily a result of acquisitions, with
the largest acquisition taking place in November 2001, when the
Company purchased for $32.6 million, the wholesale energy
business of Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland), as well as all
interest in Country Energy, LLC a joint venture formerly with
Farmland.
Country operations non-grain net sales of
$745.8 million increased by $133.3 million (22%)
during the year ended August 31, 2003 compared to the year
ended August 31, 2002. The net average price and net volume
increased on the majority of farm supply products, which
consists of seed; plant food; energy products; animal health
ingredients, supplements and products; animal health products;
and crop nutrient and crop protection products, compared to the
prior year. In addition, net sales increased $46.4 million
compared to the prior year due to the acquisition of a sunflower
processing plant.
Processed Grains and Foods segment net sales of
$491.2 million decreased $4.3 million (1%) during the
year ended August 31, 2003 compared to the year ended
August 31, 2002. Intersegment sales of $0.7 million
and $0.6 million for the years ended August 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively, have been eliminated. Oilseed processing
and refining net sales increased $81.4 million primarily
due to an average selling price increase of $0.07 per
bushel in refined oilseed. In addition, Mexican Foods sales
increased $4.1 million compared to the prior year. These
sales increases were partially offset by an $89.6 million
decrease in sales due to the formation of Horizon Milling, a
wheat flour milling and processing joint venture that was formed
in January 2002. After that date, the Company accounted for
operating results of Horizon Milling under the equity method of
accounting.
Patronage Dividends.
Patronage dividends received of $3.3 million decreased
$0.6 million (16%) during the year ended August 31,
2003 compared to the year ended August 31, 2002, due to
reduced patronage dividends from cooperatives.
26
Other Revenues.
Other revenues of $124.5 million increased
$15.1 million (14%) during the year ended August 31,
2003 compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. The most
significant increases were within the Energy, Grain Marketing
and Corporate and Other segments compared to the prior year.
Cost of Goods Sold.
Cost of goods sold of $9.1 billion increased
$2.1 billion (31%) during the year ended August 31,
2003 compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. The cost
of all grains and oilseed procured by the Company through its
Grain Marketing and Country Operations and Services segments
increased 30% compared to the year ended August 31, 2002
primarily due to a $0.92 (30%) average cost per bushel increase
while volumes remained essentially unchanged from the prior
year. This increase in cost of goods sold was primarily the
result of higher commodity prices and increased international
exports. The Energy segment cost of goods sold increased by
$986.6 million (40%) during the year ended August 31,
2003 compared to the prior year, primarily due to refined fuels
average cost increase of $778.1 million (46%), which
consists of increased average cost of $0.18 per gallon and
volume increases of 17% compared to the year ended
August 31, 2002. In addition, the average cost of propane
increased by $138.1 million (43%), of which the average
cost increased by $0.10 per gallon and volumes increased by
19% compared to the prior year. Energy cost increases were
primarily related to the global effects of higher input costs
and increased volumes primarily as a result of acquisitions.
Country operations non-grain cost of goods sold increased by 12%
during the year ended August 31, 2003 compared to the prior
year primarily due to a sunflower processing plant acquisition
and increased average cost per unit on most farm supply
products. Processed Grains and Foods segment cost of goods sold
increased by $9.3 million (2%) compared to the year ended
August 31, 2002. Oilseed processing and refining cost of
goods sold increased $94.6 million, primarily due to the
increased cost of raw materials related to oilseed refining of
$0.07 per bushel. This increase was partially offset by
decreased cost of goods sold of $89.7 million related to
the formation of Horizon Milling, as previously discussed.
Marketing, General and
Administrative.
Marketing, general and
administrative expenses of $190.6 million for the year
ended August 31, 2003 increased by $3.3 million (2%)
compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. The net
increase is primarily due to additional expenses within the
Country Operations and Services segment primarily due to a
sunflower plant acquisition.
Gain on Legal
Settlements.
The Country Operations
and Services segment received cash of $10.9 million and
$3.0 million during the years ended August 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively, from a class action lawsuit alleging
illegal price fixing against various feed vitamin product
suppliers.
Interest.
Interest
expense of $48.7 million for the year ended August 31,
2003 increased by $6.2 million (15%) compared to the year
ended August 31, 2002. The average level of short-term
borrowings increased $88.1 million primarily due to
financing working capital needs, which was partially offset by
an average short-term interest rate decrease of 0.4% during the
year ended August 31, 2003 compared to August 31,
2002. Long-term debt borrowings increased due to an additional
$175.0 million of private placement debt that was issued in
October 2002.
Equity Income from
Investments.
Equity income from
investments of $47.3 million for the year ended
August 31, 2003 decreased by $10.8 million (19%)
compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. The Company
records equity income or loss from the investments it owns 50%
or less of for its proportionate share of income or loss
reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and
expenses of the entity in the Companys consolidated
statements of operations. The decrease in equity income from
investments was primarily attributable to decreased earnings in
Ventura Foods, which was partially offset by increased earnings
in Agriliance compared to the prior year. During the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2003, the Company recorded an additional
13.1% of income from the CPP business of Agriliance, as
previously discussed.
Minority Interests.
Minority interests of $22.0 million for the year ended
August 31, 2003 increased by $6.6 million (43%)
compared to the year ended August 31, 2002. The net change
in minority interests during the year ended August 31, 2003
compared to the prior year was primarily a result of more
profitable operations within the Companys majority-owned
subsidiaries. Substantially all minority interests relate to
National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA) an
approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary.
27
Income Taxes.
Income
tax expense of $12.7 million for the year ended
August 31, 2003 compares to $18.7 million for the year
ended August 31, 2002, resulting in effective tax rates of
9.3% and 12.9%, respectively. The federal and state statutory
rate applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the
years ended August 31, 2003 and 2002. The income taxes and
effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and
nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable
years.
Net Income.
Consolidated net income for the year ended August 31, 2002
was $126.1 million compared to $178.6 million for the
year ended August 31, 2001, which represents a
$52.5 million (29%) decrease. This decrease in
profitability is primarily attributable to a tax benefit of
$34.2 million in the prior year and decreased earnings in
the Companys Energy segment compared to the year ended
August 31, 2001.
Net Sales.
Consolidated net sales of
$7.2 billion for the year ended August 31, 2002
decreased $307.8 million (4%) compared to the year ended
August 31, 2001.
Company-wide grain and oilseed net sales of
$3.5 billion increased $29.0 million (1%) during the
year ended August 31, 2002 compared to the year ended
August 31, 2001. Sales for the year ended August 31,
2002 were $3,281.4 million and $862.0 million from
Grain Marketing and Country Operations and Services segments,
respectively. Sales for the year ended August 31, 2001 were
$3,416.2 million and $913.4 million from Grain
Marketing and Country Operations and Services segments,
respectively. The Company eliminated all intersegment sales from
Country Operations and Services to Grain Marketing, of
$685.4 million and $900.6 million, for the years ended
August 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The net change in
sales was primarily due to an increase of $0.28 per bushel
(10%) in the average sales price of all grain and oilseed
marketed by the Company, which was partially offset by a
decrease in grain volume of 8% compared to the prior year. The
net increase in company-wide grain and oilseed of
$29.0 million was primarily related to an average price
increase of $335.8 million, which was partially offset by a
$306.8 million decrease related to volume.
Energy net sales of $2.6 billion decreased
$119.1 million (4%) during the year ended August 31,
2002 compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. Sales for
the year ended August 31, 2002 and 2001 were
$2,657.7 million and $2,781.2 million, respectively.
The Company eliminated all intersegment sales from the Energy
segment to Country Operations and Services segment of
$67.4 million and $71.8 million for the years ended
August 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Prior to
December 31, 2000 the company consolidated the business
activity of Cooperative Refining LLC (CRLLC), a refining joint
venture into the Energy segment. The Company held a 58% interest
in CRLLC, which was dissolved effective December 31, 2000.
Energy sales decreased by $371.6 million primarily due to
this dissolution. Refined fuels net sales that were not part of
CRLLC increased by $259.5 million due to a net volume
increase of $575.6 million, which was partially offset by a
$316.1 million decrease due to the price change compared to
the previous year. These refined fuels sales volumes increased
by 49%, which was partially offset by a decrease of $0.21 in the
average selling price compared to August 31, 2001. Propane
net sales decreased by $35.0 million; $109.7 million
due to the decrease in net price, which was partially offset by
a $74.8 million increase due to net volume change. The
average sales price of propane decreased by $0.21 per
gallon, which was partially offset by volume increases of 28%
compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. Refined fuels
and propane volume increases were primarily a result of
acquisitions, with the most substantial acquisition taking place
in November 2001, when the Company purchased for
$32.6 million, the wholesale energy business of Farmland
Industries, Inc. (Farmland), as well as all interest in Country
Energy, LLC a joint venture formerly with Farmland.
Country operations non-grain sales of
$612.5 million decreased by $51.3 million (8%) during
the year ended August 31, 2002 compared to the year ended
August 31, 2001. The decrease is primarily due to a
reduction of $46.3 million (24%) in the average retail
sales price of energy products compared to the prior year.
Non-grain sales consist of seed; plant food; energy products;
animal health ingredients, supplements and products; animal
health products; and crop nutrient and crop protection products.
28
Processed Grains and Foods segment net sales of
$495.5 million decreased $166.4 million (25%) during
the year ended August 31, 2002 compared to the year ended
August 31, 2001. Intersegment sales of $0.6 million
and $0.8 million, for the years ended August 31, 2002
and 2001, respectively, have been eliminated. Sales decreased
$167.4 million primarily due to the formation of Horizon
Milling as previously discussed.
Patronage Dividends.
Patronage dividends received of $3.9 million decreased
$2.1 million (35%) during the year ended August 31,
2002 compared to the year ended August 31, 2001, due to
reduced patronage dividends from cooperatives.
Other Revenues.
Other revenues of $109.5 million decreased
$6.8 million (6%) during the year ended August 31,
2002 compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. The most
significant changes were within the Energy segment, and
Corporate and Other compared to the prior year.
Cost of Goods Sold.
Cost of goods sold of $6.9 billion decreased
$240.5 million (3%) during the year ended August 31,
2002 compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. The cost
of all grains and oilseed procured by the Company through its
Grain Marketing and Country Operations and Services segments
increased $28.0 million compared to the year ended
August 31, 2001 primarily due to a $0.27 (10%) average cost
per bushel increase, which was partially offset by an
8% decrease in volume. This increase was partially offset
by decreases in cost of goods sold in the Processed Grains and
Foods, Country Operations and Services and Energy segments.
Processed Grains and Foods segment cost of goods sold decreased
by 26% compared to the year ended August 31, 2001,
primarily due to the formation of Horizon Milling, as previously
described. Country operations non-grain cost of goods sold
decreased by 9% during the year ended August 31, 2002
compared to the prior year primarily due to the reduced cost of
energy products. The Energy segment cost of goods sold decreased
by 2% during the year ended August 31, 2002 compared to the
prior year, primarily due to the dissolution of CRLLC, as
previously discussed. However, the volumes of refined fuels that
were not associated with the dissolution of CRLLC increased by
49%, which was partially offset by an average cost decrease of
$0.18 per gallon compared to the year ended August 31,
2001. The average cost of propane decreased by $0.19 per
gallon, which was partially offset by a 28% volume increase
compared to the prior year. These volume increases were
primarily the result of acquisitions.
Marketing, General and
Administrative.
Marketing, general and
administrative expenses of $187.3 million for the year
ended August 31, 2002 increased by $3.2 million (2%)
compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. The net
increase is primarily due to additional expenses resulting from
Energy segment acquisitions, which was partially offset by
reduced expenses within the Processed Grains and Foods segment
due to the formation of Horizon Milling described earlier.
Gain on Legal
Settlements.
During the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2002, the Country Operations and Services
segment received $3.0 million in cash from a class action
lawsuit alleging illegal price fixing against various feed
vitamin product suppliers.
Interest.
Interest
expense of $42.5 million for the year ended August 31,
2002 decreased by $19.0 million (31%) compared to the year
ended August 31, 2001. The average level of short-term
borrowings decreased $68.3 million (24%) and the average
short-term interest rate decreased 3.6% during the year ended
August 31, 2002 compared to the prior year. The net
decrease in interest expense from short-term borrowings was
partially offset by an increase due to an additional
$80.0 million of long-term debt from a private placement,
of which $25.0 million and $55.0 million were issued
in January and March 2001, respectively.
Equity Income from
Investments.
Equity income from
investments of $58.1 million for the year ended
August 31, 2002 increased by $29.6 million (104%)
compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. The increase
was primarily attributable to decreased losses from Corporate
and Other segment technology investments of $15.1 million
which was dissolved. In addition, earnings from Agronomy, and
Processed Grains and Foods segments investments increased in
fiscal year 2002 by $6.1 million and $5.8 million,
respectively compared to the prior year.
29
Minority Interests.
Minority interests of $15.4 million for the year ended
August 31, 2002 decreased by $19.7 million (56%)
compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. The change in
minority interests during the year ended August 31, 2002
compared to the prior year was primarily a result of less
profitable operations within the Companys majority-owned
subsidiaries and the dissolution of CRLLC. Substantially all
minority interests relate to National Cooperative Refinery
Association (NCRA) an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary.
Income Taxes.
Income
tax expense of $18.7 million for the year ended
August 31, 2002 compares to a tax benefit of
$25.6 million for the year ended August 31, 2001,
resulting in effective tax rates of a 12.9% expense and a 16.7%
benefit, respectively. The federal and state statutory rate
applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the
years ended August 31, 2002 and 2001. An income tax benefit
of $34.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2001
resulted from a change in the tax rate applied to the
Companys cumulative temporary differences between income
for financial statement purposes and income used for tax
reporting purposes. The Companys calculation of its
patronage distribution using earnings for financial statement
purposes rather than tax basis earnings prompted the rate
change. The Company recorded income tax expense of
$18.7 million for the year ended August 31, 2002,
which compares to $8.6 million for the year ended
August 31, 2001, exclusive of the $34.2 million
benefit related to the change in patronage determination
described above. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary
each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business
activity during each of the comparable years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows related to changes in working capital
are primarily the function of the underlying prices for grain
and crude oil. A large part of the Companys working
capital needs caused by these price changes are financed with
short-term notes payable. Since the changes in short-term notes
payable are shown in cash flows from financing activities, they
do not offset the changes in working capital requirements in
cash flows from operations. The changes in working capital
requirements resulting in periodic fluctuations in cash flows
from operations are not, therefore, indicative of a trend in
future operating results or future financial condition.
Future trends are unknown as commodity prices are
affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control,
including the weather, crop damage due to disease or insects,
drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government
regulation and policies, world events, and general political and
economic conditions. These factors that affect prices are
described in Exhibit 99.1 Cautionary Statement and may affect
working capital requirements and liquidity.
Operating activities of the Company provided net
cash of $216.5 million during the year ended
August 31, 2003. Net income of $123.8 million and net
non-cash expenses of $98.0 million were partially offset by
increased working capital requirements of $5.3 million.
Operating activities of the Company used net cash
of $35.9 million during the year ended August 31,
2002. Net income of $126.1 million and net non-cash
expenses of $62.4 million were offset by increased working
capital requirements of $224.4 million. This increase in
working capital requirements was primarily due to stronger
commodity prices.
Operating activities of the Company provided net
cash of $253.9 million during the year ended
August 31, 2001. Net income of $178.6 million, net
non-cash expenses of $50.5 million and decreased working
capital requirements of $24.8 million provided this net
cash from operating activities.
For the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, the net cash flows used in the Companys
investing activities totaled $173.3 million,
$147.6 million and $70.2 million, respectively.
30
The acquisition of property, plant and equipment
comprised the primary use of cash totaling $175.7 million,
$140.2 million and $97.6 million for the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These
acquisitions of property, plant and equipment included
$8.5 million, $6.6 million and $5.3 million
acquired as part of business acquisitions during the respective
fiscal years. Capital expenditures during the year ended
August 31, 2003 included $46.0 million for the
construction of an oilseed processing facility in Fairmont,
Minnesota, with total expenditures for the project at
$68.9 million through August 31, 2003. The Fairmont
facility was essentially complete and operational during the
first quarter of fiscal 2004, and total costs for the project
are estimated to be approximately $85.0 million. For the
year ended August 31, 2004 the Company expects to spend
approximately $252.7 million for the acquisition of
property, plant and equipment. Capital expenditures primarily
related to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) low sulfur fuel regulations required by 2006, are
expected to be approximately $87.0 million for the
Companys Laurel, Montana refinery and $324.0 million
for NCRAs McPherson, Kansas refinery, of which
$8.7 million has been spent at the Laurel refinery and
$36.5 million has been spent by NCRA at the McPherson
refinery as of August 31, 2003. The Company expects all of
these compliance capital expenditures at the refineries to be
complete by December 31, 2005, and anticipates funding
these projects with a combination of cash flows from operations
and debt proceeds.
In October 2003, the Company and NCRA reached
agreement with the EPA and the State of Montanas
Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas
Department of Health and Environment, respectively, regarding
the terms of settlements with respect to reducing air emissions
at the Companys Laurel, Montana and NCRAs McPherson,
Kansas refineries. These settlements are part of a series of
similar settlements that the EPA has negotiated with major
refiners under the EPAs Petroleum Refinery Initiative. The
settlements, which resulted from nearly three years of
discussions, take the form of consent decrees filed with the
U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (Billings
Division) and the U.S. District Court for the District of
Kansas, respectively. Each consent decree details specific
capital improvements, supplemental environmental projects and
operational changes that the Company and NCRA have agreed to
implement at the relevant refinery over the next several years.
The consent decrees also require the Company and NCRA to pay
approximately $0.5 million in aggregate civil cash
penalties. The Company and NCRA anticipate that their aggregate
capital expenditures related to these settlements will total
approximately $25.0 million to $30.0 million over the
next eight years. Approximately 50 percent of the
expenditures will be made over the first three years. The
Company does not believe that the settlements will have a
material adverse affect on the Company.
Investments made during the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 totaled $43.5 million,
$6.2 million and $14.2 million, respectively.
Investments during the year ended August 31, 2003 included
the purchase of an additional economic interest in the wholesale
crop protection business of Agriliance, as previously explained.
Acquisitions of intangibles were
$0.8 million, $29.5 million and $7.3 million for
the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. During the year ended August 31, 2002,
$26.4 million of the acquisitions of intangibles were
related to the purchase of Farmlands interest in its
wholesale energy business, as previously discussed, and
represented trademarks, tradenames and non-compete agreements.
During the year ended August 31, 2001, the intangibles
resulted primarily from the purchase of a Mexican foods business.
Net working capital acquired in business
acquisitions was $13.0 million, $5.8 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, during the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.
During the years ended August 31, 2003 and
2002 the changes in notes receivable resulted in decreases in
cash flows of $6.6 million and $22.0 million,
respectively, primarily from related party notes receivables at
NCRA from its minority owners, Growmark, Inc. and MFA Oil
Company. During the year ended August 31, 2001 the changes
in notes receivable resulted in an increase in cash flows of
$0.5 million.
Distributions to minority owners for the years
ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were
$4.4 million, $7.4 million and $19.3 million,
respectively, and were primarily related to NCRA. For the
31
Partially offsetting cash outlays in investing
activities were proceeds from the disposition of property, plant
and equipment of $26.9 million, $20.2 million and
$35.3 million for the years ended August 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively. During the year ended
August 31, 2003, the proceeds were primarily from disposals
of propane plants and non-strategic locations in the Energy
segment, sales of equipment and non-strategic agri-operations
locations in the Country Operations and Services segment, and
sales of wheat milling equipment. During the year ended
August 31, 2002, the proceeds were primarily from the
disposal of propane plants in the Energy segment and of
non-strategic agri-operations locations in the Country
Operations and Services segment. Also partially offsetting cash
usages were distributions received from joint ventures and
investments totaling $44.4 million, $44.0 million and
$31.8 million for the years ended August 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company finances its working capital needs
through short-term lines of credit with a syndication of banks.
In May 2003, the Company entered into a new 364-day credit
facility of $600.0 million committed. In addition to these
lines of credit, the Company has a 364-day credit facility
dedicated to NCRA, with a syndication of banks in the amount of
$30.0 million committed. On August 31, 2003 and 2002,
the Company had total short-term indebtedness outstanding on
these various facilities and other short-term notes payable
totaling $251.1 million and $332.5 million,
respectively. In October 2002, $175.0 million received from
private placement proceeds was used to pay down the
Companys 364-day credit facility. In January 2003,
$83.0 million of proceeds received from the issuance of the
Companys preferred stock (net of broker commissions of
$3.2 million) was also used to pay down the 364-day credit
facility.
In June 1998, the Company established a five-year
revolving credit facility with a syndication of banks, with
$200.0 million committed, which expired in May 2003. The
Company had a previous outstanding balance on this facility of
$75.0 million on August 31, 2002, of which repayments
of $75.0 million were made during the year ended
August 31, 2003.
In May 2003, the Company established a three-year
revolving credit facility with a syndication of banks, with
$100.0 million committed. There was no outstanding balance
on this new credit facility on August 31, 2003.
The Company finances its long-term capital needs,
primarily for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment,
with long-term agreements with various insurance companies and
banks. In June 1998, the Company established a long-term credit
agreement through the cooperative banks. This facility committed
$200.0 million of long-term borrowing capacity to the
Company, with repayments through fiscal year 2009. The amount
outstanding on this credit facility was $137.8 million and
$144.3 million on August 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Repayments of $6.6 million were made on this
facility during each of the three years ended August 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001.
Also in June 1998, the Company completed a
private placement offering with several insurance companies for
long-term debt in the amount of $225.0 million. Repayments
will be made in equal annual installments of $37.5 million
each in the years 2008 through 2013.
In January 2001, the Company entered into a note
purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Insurance
Company. The long-term note in the amount of $25.0 million
will be repaid in equal annual installments of approximately
$3.6 million, in the years 2005 through 2011. A subsequent
note for $55.0 million was issued in March 2001, related to
the private shelf facility. The $55.0 million note will be
repaid in equal annual installments of approximately
$7.9 million, in the years 2005 through 2011.
In October 2002, the Company completed a private
placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in
the amount of $175.0 million which was layered into two
series. The first series of
32
The Company, through NCRA, had revolving term
loans outstanding of $15.0 million and $18.0 million
for the years ended August 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Repayments of $3.0 million were made during each of the
three years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.
On August 31, 2003, the Company had total
long-term debt outstanding of $663.2 million, of which
$168.0 million was bank financing, $480.0 million was
private placement proceeds and $15.2 million was industrial
development revenue bonds and other notes and contracts payable.
On August 31, 2002, the Company had long-term debt
outstanding of $572.1 million. The Company is in compliance
with all debt covenants and restrictions as of August 31,
2003. The aggregate amount of long-term debt payable as of
August 31, 2003 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
During the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, the Company borrowed on a long-term basis
$175.0 million, $30.0 million and $116.9 million,
respectively, and during the same periods repaid long-term debt
of $89.5 million, $18.0 million and
$67.4 million, respectively.
In accordance with the bylaws and by action of
the Board of Directors, annual net earnings from patronage
sources are distributed to consenting patrons following the
close of each fiscal year. Patronage refunds are calculated
based on amounts using financial statement earnings. The cash
portion of the patronage distribution is determined annually by
the Board of Directors, with the balance issued in the form of
capital equity certificates. The patronage earnings from the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2002 were primarily
distributed during the second quarter of the year ended
August 31, 2003. The cash portion of this distribution,
deemed by the Board of Directors to be 30% was
$26.5 million. During the years ended August 31, 2002
and 2001, the Company distributed cash patronage of
$40.1 million and $26.1 million, respectively.
Cash patronage for the year ended August 31,
2003, deemed by the Board of Directors to be 30% and to be
distributed in fiscal year 2004, is expected to be approximately
$27.0 million and is classified as a current liability on
the August 31, 2003 consolidated balance sheet.
The current equity redemption policy, as
authorized by the Board of Directors, allows for the redemption
of capital equity certificates held by inactive direct members
and patrons and active direct members and patrons at age 72 or
death that were of age 61 or older on June 1, 1998. Such
redemptions are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. For
active direct members and patrons who were of age 60 or younger
on June 1, 1998, and member cooperatives, equities older
than 10 years may be redeemed annually based on a prorata
formula where the numerator is dollars available for such
purpose as determined by the Board of Directors, and the
denominator is the sum of the patronage certificates older than
10 years held by such eligible members and patrons. For the
years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company
redeemed patronage related equities in accordance with
authorization from the Board of Directors in the amounts of
$31.1 million, $31.1 million and $18.7 million,
respectively. Total cash redemptions related to the year ended
August 31, 2003, to be distributed in fiscal year 2004, are
expected to be approximately $10.8 million and are
classified as a current liability on the August 31, 2003
33
During the year ended May 31, 1997, the
Company offered securities in the form of Equity Participation
Units (EPUs) in its Wheat Milling and Oilseed Processing and
Refining Defined Business Units. These EPUs gave the holder the
right and obligation to deliver to the Company a stated number
of bushels in return for a prorata share of the undiluted grain
based patronage earnings of these respective Defined Business
Units. The offering resulted in the issuance of such equity with
a stated value of $13,870,000 and generated additional capital
and cash of $10,837,000, after issuance cost and conversion
privileges. Conversion privileges allowed a member to elect to
use outstanding patrons equities for the payment of up to
one-sixth the purchase price of the EPUs. During 2001, the
Companys Board of Directors adopted a resolution to issue,
at no charge, to each Defined Member of the Oilseed Processing
and Refining Defined Business Unit an additional 1/4 Equity
Participation Unit (EPU) for each EPU held, due to
increased crush volume.
In August 2001, the CHS Board of Directors
approved and consummated a plan to end the Defined Investment
Program. The Company redeemed all of the EPUs and allocated the
assets of the Oilseed Processing and Refining and Wheat Milling
Defined Business Units to the Company as provided in the plan.
Due to loss carry-forwards incurred by the Wheat Milling Defined
Business Unit the plan also provided for the cancellation of all
outstanding Preferred Capital Certificates issued to the EPU
holders, totaling $0.2 million. The plan further provided
to the Oilseed Processing Defined Member EPU holders for the
redemption of all outstanding Preferred Capital Certificates
issued and a 100% cash distribution during 2002 for the
patronage refunds earned for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2001.
In 2001 and 2002 the Company issued approximately
$9.5 million (9,454,874 shares) of 8% Preferred Stock (Old
Preferred). In late 2002, the Company suspended sales of the Old
Preferred, and on February 25, 2003 the Company filed a
post-effective amendment to terminate the offering of the Old
Preferred shares. In January 2003, the Board of Directors
authorized the sale and issuance of up to 3,500,000 shares of 8%
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (New Preferred) at a price
of $25.00 per share. The Company filed a registration statement
on Form S-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
registering 3,000,000 shares of the New Preferred (with an
additional over-allotment option of 450,000 shares granted to
the underwriters), which was declared effective on
January 27, 2003. The shares were subsequently sold for
proceeds of $86.3 million (3,450,000 shares), and are
listed on the NASDAQ National Market. The Board of Directors
intent is to pay quarterly dividends. Expenses related to the
issuance of the New Preferred were $3.8 million.
On March 5, 2003, the Companys Board
of Directors authorized the redemption and conversion of the Old
Preferred shares. A redemption notification and a conversion
election form were sent to holders of the Old Preferred shares
on March 21, 2003 explaining that on April 25, 2003
all shares of the Old Preferred would be redeemed by the Company
for $1.00 per share unless they were converted into shares of
the Companys New Preferred. The conversion did not change
the base liquidation amount or dividend amount of the Old
Preferred, since 25 shares of the Old Preferred converted to 1
share of the New Preferred. The total Old Preferred converted to
the New Preferred was $7.5 million (7,452,439 shares), and the
balance of the Old Preferred (2,002,435 shares) was redeemed in
cash at $1.00 per share. As of August 31, 2003 the Company
had $93.7 million (3,748,099 shares) of the New Preferred
outstanding.
Off Balance Sheet Financing
Arrangements
The Company has commitments under operating
leases for various refinery, manufacturing and transportation
equipment, rail cars, vehicles and office space. Some leases
include purchase options at not less than fair market value at
the end of the leases.
34
Total rental expense for all operating leases,
net of rail car mileage credits received from the railroad and
sublease income for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001 was $31.7 million, $30.7 million and $35.5
million, respectively.
Minimum future lease payments, required under
noncancellable operating leases as of August 31, 2003, were
as follows:
The Company is a guarantor for lines of credit
for related companies of which $52.3 million was
outstanding on August 31, 2003. The Companys bank
covenants allow maximum guarantees of $150.0 million. In
addition, the Companys bank covenants allow for guarantees
dedicated solely for NCRA in the amount of $125.0 million.
All outstanding loans with respective creditors are current as
of August 31, 2003.
There is no material off balance sheet debt.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements of the
Company are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires
the use of estimates as well as managements judgments and
assumptions regarding matters that are subjective, uncertain or
involve a high degree of complexity, all of which affect the
results of operations and financial condition for the periods
presented. The Company believes that of its significant
accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree
of estimates, judgments, and complexity.
The allowances for doubtful accounts are
maintained at a level considered appropriate by management based
on analyses of credit quality for specific accounts, historical
trends of charge-offs and recoveries, and current and projected
economic and market conditions. Different assumptions, changes
in economic circumstances or the deterioration of the financial
condition of the Companys customers could result in
additional provisions to the allowances for doubtful accounts
and increased bad debt expense.
Grain, processed grains, oilseed and processed
oilseeds are stated at net realizable values, which approximates
market values. All other inventories are stated at the lower of
cost or market. The cost of certain energy inventories
(wholesale refined products, crude oil and asphalt) are
determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method; all
other energy inventories are valued on the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) and average cost methods. Estimates are used in
determining the net realizable value of grain and oilseed and
processed grains and oilseeds inventories. These estimates
include the measurement of grain in bins and
35
The Company enters into exchange-traded commodity
futures and options contracts to hedge its exposure to price
fluctuations on energy, grain and oilseed transactions to the
extent considered practicable for minimizing risk. The Company
does not use derivatives for speculative purposes. Futures and
options contracts used for hedging are purchased and sold
through regulated commodity exchanges. Fluctuations in inventory
valuations, however, may not be completely hedged, due in part
to the absence of satisfactory hedging facilities for certain
commodities and geographical areas and in part to the
Companys assessment of its exposure from expected price
fluctuations. The Company also manages its risks by entering
into fixed price purchase contracts with pre-approved producers
and establishing appropriate limits for individual suppliers.
Fixed price sales contracts are entered into with customers of
acceptable creditworthiness, as internally evaluated. The
Company is exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the
counterparties to the contracts; however, the Company does not
anticipate nonperformance by counterparties. The fair value of
futures and options contracts are determined primarily from
quotes listed on regulated commodity exchanges. Fixed price
purchase and sales contracts are with various counterparties,
and the fair values of such contracts are determined from the
market price of the underlying product.
Pension and other postretirement benefits costs
and obligations are dependent on assumptions used in calculating
such amounts. These assumptions include discount rates, health
care cost trend rates, benefits earned, interest costs, expected
return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. In
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, actual results that differ from the
assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods
and, therefore, generally affect recognized expenses and the
recorded obligations in future periods. While management
believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences
in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect the
Companys pension and other postretirement obligations and
future expenses.
The Company assesses whether a valuation
allowance is necessary to reduce its deferred tax assets to the
amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized.
While the Company has considered future taxable income as well
as other factors in assessing the need for the valuation
allowance, in the event that the Company were to determine that
it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred
tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax
assets would be charged to income in the period such
determination was made.
Depreciation and amortization of the
Companys property, plant and equipment is provided on the
straight-line method by charges to operations at rates based
upon the expected useful lives of individual or groups of
assets. Economic circumstances or other factors may cause
managements estimates of expected useful lives to differ
from actual.
All long-lived assets, including property plant
and equipment, goodwill, investments in unconsolidated
affiliates and other identifiable intangibles, are evaluated for
impairment on the basis of undiscounted cash flows at least
annually for goodwill, and whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. An impaired asset is written down to its
estimated
36
Liabilities, including legal costs, related to
remediation of contaminated properties are recognized when the
related costs are considered probable and can be reasonably
estimated. Estimates of these costs are based on current
available facts, existing technology, undiscounted site-specific
costs and currently enacted laws and regulations. Recoveries, if
any, are recorded in the period in which recovery is considered
probable. It is often difficult to estimate the cost of
environmental compliance, remediation and potential claims given
the uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforcement
of applicable environmental laws and regulations, the extent of
environmental contamination and the existence of alternate
cleanup methods. All liabilities are monitored and adjusted as
new facts or changes in law or technology occur and management
believes adequate provisions have been made for environmental
liabilities. Changes in facts or circumstances may have an
adverse impact on the Companys financial results.
Effect of Inflation and Foreign Currency
Transactions
The Company believes that inflation and foreign
currency fluctuations have not had a significant effect on its
operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
During 2003, the Company adopted SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) which addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement
costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The
Companys Energy segment operates oil refineries and
related pipelines for which the Company would be subject to
Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) if such assets were to
be dismantled. The Company, however, expects to operate its
refineries and related pipelines indefinitely. Since the time
period to dismantle these assets is indeterminate, a
corresponding ARO is not estimable and therefore has not been
recorded.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. The interpretation addresses
consolidation of certain entities in which equity investors do
not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest
or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to
finance its activities without additional subordinated financial
support from other parties. It also requires consolidation by
primary beneficiary. The interpretation applies immediately to
variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003,
and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains
an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year
or interim period beginning after December 15, 2003, to
variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a
variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003.
The Company believes that the effects of adopting this standard
will not have a material effect on the Company.
On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends
and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and
for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The new guidance
amends SFAS No. 133 for decisions made as part of the
Derivatives Implementation Group process that effectively
required amendments to SFAS No. 133, and decisions made in
connection with other FASB projects dealing with financial
instruments and in connection with implementation issues raised
in relation to the application of the definition of a derivative
and characteristics of a derivative that contains financing
components. In addition, it clarifies when a derivative contains
a financing component that warrants special reporting in the
statements of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is effective for
contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and
for hedging
37
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, which
establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures
certain financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a
financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or
an asset in certain circumstances). Many of those instruments
were previously classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective
for financial instruments entered into or modified after
May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning
of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003,
except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of
nonpublic entities which are subject to the provisions for the
first fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2003. The
Statement is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative
effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial
instruments created before the issuance date of the Statement
and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of
adoption. The Company believes that the effects of adopting this
standard will not have a material effect on the Company.
Comparison of the years ended
August 31, 2003 and 2002
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Comparison of the years ended
August 31, 2002 and 2001
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Operations
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities
Table of Contents
$
14,951
34,716
35,176
59,671
98,190
420,469
$
663,173
Table of Contents
Lease Commitments:
Table of Contents
Total
(dollars in millions)
$
33.4
24.4
19.2
12.6
7.2
10.6
$
107.4
Guarantees:
Debt:
Allowances for Doubtful
Accounts
Inventory Valuation and
Reserves
Table of Contents
Derivative Financial
Instruments
Pension and Other Postretirement
Benefits
Deferred Tax Assets
Long-Lived Assets
Table of Contents
Environmental Liabilities
Table of Contents
Commodity Price Risk |
The Company utilizes futures and options contracts offered through regulated commodity exchanges to reduce price risk. The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the market value of inventories and fixed or partially fixed purchase and sales contracts. In order to reduce that risk, the Company generally takes opposite and offsetting positions using futures contracts or options.
Certain commodities cannot be hedged with futures or options contracts because such contracts are not offered for these commodities by regulated commodity exchanges. Inventories and purchase contracts for those commodities are hedged with forward sales contracts, to the extent practical, in order to arrive at a net commodity position within the formal position limits set by the Company and deemed prudent for each of those commodities. Commodities for which futures contracts and options are available are also typically hedged first with forward contracts, with futures and options used to hedge within position limits the remaining portion. These futures and options contracts and forward purchase and sales cash contracts used to hedge against commodity price changes are effective economic hedges of price risk, but they are not designated as, or accounted for as, hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
Unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts and options used as economic hedges of grain and oilseed inventories and fixed price contracts are recognized in cost of goods sold for financial reporting on a monthly basis using market based prices. Inventories and fixed price contracts are marked to fair value using market based prices so that gains or losses on the derivative contracts are offset by gains or losses on inventories and fixed priced contracts during the same accounting period.
Unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts and options used as economic hedges of energy inventories and fixed price contracts are recognized in cost of goods sold for financial reporting on a monthly basis using market based prices. The inventories hedged with these derivatives are valued at the lower of cost or fair value, and the fixed price contracts are marked to fair value using market based prices. Certain fixed price contracts related to propane in the Energy segment meet the normal purchase and sales exemption, and thus are not required to be marked to fair value.
A 10% adverse change in market prices would not materially affect the Companys results of operations, financial position or liquidity, since the Companys operations have effective economic hedging requirements as a general business practice.
Interest Rate Risk |
The Company manages interest expense using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt. These debt instruments are carried at amounts approximating estimated fair value. Short-term debt used to finance inventories and receivables is represented by notes payable within thirty days or less so that the blended
38
In August 2002, the Company entered into interest rate treasury lock instruments to secure the interest rate related to a portion of its private placement debt issued on October 18, 2002. These instruments were designated and effective as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, and accordingly, the loss on settlement was recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Interest expense for the year ended August 31, 2003, includes $0.7 million related to the interest rate derivatives. The additional interest expense is an offset to the lower actual interest paid on the outstanding debt instruments.
Foreign Currency Risk |
The Company conducts essentially all of its business in U.S. dollars except for grain marketing operations in Brazil and some purchases of products from Canada, and had minimal risk regarding foreign currency fluctuations during 2003. Foreign currency fluctuations do, however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase U.S. agricultural products and the competitiveness of U.S. agricultural products compared to the same products offered by alternative sources of world supply.
The financial statements listed in 15(a)(1) are
set forth beginning on page F-1. Supplementary financial
information required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K for
the years ended August 31, 2003 and 2002 is presented
below. Financial statement schedules are omitted because they
are not applicable or the required information is shown in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
2003
November 30, 2002
February 28
May 31
August 31
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
$
2,400,596
$
2,328,154
$
2,220,455
$
2,321,529
2,435,851
2,356,737
2,251,928
2,354,017
99,089
61,301
98,588
80,604
40,356
(4,100
)
52,173
35,412
2002
November 30, 2001
February 28
May 31
August 31
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
$
1,729,453
$
1,704,249
$
1,763,266
$
1,959,486
1,762,250
1,729,085
1,792,696
1,985,767
100,385
62,245
90,983
75,259
41,355
2,371
46,641
35,771
None.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
39
During our fourth fiscal quarter, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Following the end of our fourth fiscal quarter, we determined that certain sales and transfers within our Grain Marketing business segment had not been properly identified and eliminated in our consolidated financial statements for certain periods prior to that fiscal quarter. In response, we changed our internal control over financial reporting to include additional processes that are intended to ensure the proper identification and reporting of intra-company transactions and enable us to eliminate those transactions in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
40
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
The table below lists the directors of the Company as of August 31, 2003.
Director | ||||||||||||
Name and Address | Age | District | Since | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Bruce Anderson
|
51 | 3 | 1995 | |||||||||
13500 42nd St NE | ||||||||||||
Glenburn, ND 58740-9564 | ||||||||||||
Robert Bass
|
49 | 5 | 1994 | |||||||||
E 6391 Bass Road | ||||||||||||
Reedsburg, WI 53959 | ||||||||||||
David Bielenberg
|
54 | 6 | 2002 | |||||||||
16425 Herigstad Road NE | ||||||||||||
Silverton, Oregon 97381 | ||||||||||||
Dennis Carlson
|
42 | 3 | 2001 | |||||||||
3255 50th Street | ||||||||||||
Mandan, ND 58554 | ||||||||||||
Curt Eischens
|
51 | 1 | 1990 | |||||||||
2153 330th St North | ||||||||||||
Minnesota, MN 56264-1880 | ||||||||||||
Robert Elliott
|
53 | 8 | 1996 | |||||||||
324 Hillcrest | ||||||||||||
Alliance, NE 69301 | ||||||||||||
Robert Grabarski
|
54 | 5 | 1999 | |||||||||
1770 Highway 21 | ||||||||||||
Arkdale, WI 54613 | ||||||||||||
Jerry Hasnedl
|
57 | 1 | 1995 | |||||||||
12276 150th Avenue SE | ||||||||||||
St. Hilaire, MN 56754 -9776 | ||||||||||||
Glen Keppy
|
56 | 7 | 1999 | |||||||||
21316 155th Avenue | ||||||||||||
Davenport, IA 52804 | ||||||||||||
James Kile
|
55 | 6 | 1992 | |||||||||
508 W. Bell Lane | ||||||||||||
St. John, WA 99171 | ||||||||||||
Randy Knecht
|
53 | 4 | 2001 | |||||||||
40193 112th Street | ||||||||||||
Houghton, SD 57449 | ||||||||||||
Leonard Larsen
|
67 | 3 | 1993 | |||||||||
5128 11th Ave. N. | ||||||||||||
Granville, ND 58741-9595 | ||||||||||||
Richard Owen
|
49 | 2 | 1999 | |||||||||
PO Box 129 | ||||||||||||
Geraldine, MT 59446 | ||||||||||||
Duane Stenzel
|
57 | 1 | 1993 | |||||||||
62904 295th Street | ||||||||||||
Wells, MN 56097 |
41
Director
Name and Address
Age
District
Since
41
1
1992
RR 1, Box 190
Browns Valley, MN 56219
67
4
1993
24106 408th Avenue
Letcher, SD 57359-6021
70
1
1982
47947 370th Street
Nicollet, MN 56074
Bruce Anderson (1995): Served four years in the North Dakota House of Representatives. Held positions with North Dakota Farmers Union and Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Company. Vice chairman of the North Dakota Agricultural Products Utilization Commission. Raises 1,000 acres of small grains near Glenburn, N.D.
Robert Bass (1994): Chairman of board audit committee. Also director of Wisconsin Federation of Cooperatives, as well as Co-op Country Partners, Baraboo, Wis., for 15 years, seven as president. Graduate of the Madison Area Technical College Farm Training Program and holds a B.S. degree in agricultural and extension education from the University of Wisconsin Madison. Operates a 500-acre dairy and feed grain farm near Reedsburg, Wis.
David Bielenberg (2002): Director of Wilco Farmers Cooperative of Mt. Angel, Ore., beginning in 1989, including five years as chairman. Chair of the East Valley Water District. Holds a B.S. degree in Agricultural Engineering from Oregon State University and is a graduate of the Texas A&M University executive program for agricultural producers. Operates a diversified vegetable, fruit and horticultural farm near Silverton, Ore.
Dennis Carlson (2001): Chairman, Farmers Union Oil Co. of Bismarck/ Mandan, N.D., serving since 1989. Operates a diversified wheat, sunflower and cow-calf operation near Mandan.
Curt Eischens (1990): Has served as director of Farmers Co-op Association, Canby, Minn. for nine years, eight as board chairman. Chair of the Minnesota Association of Cooperatives. Operates a corn and soybean farm near Canby. Graduate of the Canby Area Technical College Farm Management Program.
Robert Elliott (1996): Served on the boards of Western Cooperative Alliance and New Alliance Bean and Grain Company. Past president of Nebraska Wheat Growers Association and president of Hemingford Scholarship Foundation. Raises 5,000 acres of wheat, corn, dry beans, sugar beets and millet. Holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in agriculture from California Polytechnic University.
Robert Grabarski (1999): Chairman of Wisconsin River Cooperative, Adams and Mauston, Wis., and first vice chairman of Alto Cooperative Creamery, Waupun, Wis. Graduate of the University of Wisconsin agriculture industry shortcourse. Operates a 1,500-acre dairy and crop farm, milking 90 registered Holsteins, near Arkdale, Wis.
Jerry Hasnedl (1995): Serves on boards for the Minnesota Association of Cooperatives and Minnesota Barley Growers. Chair of the former Wheat Milling Defined Member Board and former director for Northwest Grain. Member of the CHS Foundation Finance and Investment Committee. Raises wheat, barley, corn, soybeans, canola, sunflowers and alfalfa near St. Hilaire, Minn.
Glen Keppy (1999): Serves on advisory committee for Clean Water Foundation and executive committee of the U.S. Meat Export Federation. Has been director of the Iowa Pork Producers Association, National Pork Producers Association and Federal Reserve Bank Ag Committee. Graduate of University of Wisconsin Platteville with a degree in technical agriculture. Operates a farrow-to-finish hog farm and raises 1,000 acres of corn, soybeans, oats and alfalfa near Davenport, Iowa.
42
James Kile (1992): Served 18 years, including 10 as chairman, on the board of St. John (Wash.) Grange Supply. Represents CHS on the Washington State Council of Farmer Cooperatives and Idaho Cooperative Council. Holds a degree in agricultural economics from Washington State University and worked in banking before returning to St. John to operate a dryland wheat and barley farm.
Randy Knecht (2001): Served on board of Four Seasons Cooperative, Britton, S.D., for seven years, chairman of Northern Electric Cooperative board and director for Dakota Value Capture Cooperative, Pierre, S.D. Holds a B.S. degree in agriculture from South Dakota State University. Maintains a 450-head cow-calf operation and raises 4,000 acres of corn, soybeans, wheat and alfalfa near Houghton, S.D.
Leonard Larsen (1993): Member of Farmers Union Oil Companies, Minot and Velva, N.D.; SunPrairie Grain; and Dakota Growers Pasta Co. Former board member of Minot Farmers Union Elevator, including six years as chairman. Member of the North Dakota Farmers Union. Served on Hendrickson Township board and the Granville Economic Development Corporation. Raises grain, sunflower, canola and flax near Granville, N.D.
Richard Owen (1999): Serves on boards of Montana Council of Cooperatives, Mountain View, LLC, and Cooperative Development Center, and on the CHS Foundation Finance and Investment Committee. Former secretary and president of Equity Co-op Association of Geraldine, Mont., and past secretary of Central Montana Cooperative of Geraldine and Denton. Holds bachelors degree in agriculture from Montana State University. Operates a grain farm near Geraldine.
Duane Stenzel (1993): Member of WFS, St. James, Minn., and Wells (Minn.) Farmers Elevator, where he served as board president and secretary. Previously chair of former CHS Oilseed Processing and Refining Defined Member Board. Raises 710 acres of soybeans, sweet corn and corn near Wells.
Michael Toelle (elected in 1992; chairman since 2002): Chaired corporate responsibility committee and served on audit committee and on the CHS Foundation Finance and Investment Committee. Served 15 years as director of Country Partners Cooperative, Browns Valley, Minn., including 10 years as chairman. Holds a B.S. degree in industrial technology from Moorhead State University. Operates a grain and hog farm near Browns Valley.
Merlin Van Walleghen (1993): Previously director of Farmers Co-op Elevator Association of Mitchell, Letcher and Alexandria, S.D., including 10 years as president. Served nine years on the South Dakota Association of Cooperatives board, seven as president. Member of Heartland Consumer Power District board, former Butler Township supervisor and past board member of Farmers Home Administration. Operates a corn and soybean operation near Letcher.
Elroy Webster (1982): Co-chairman of CHS board 1998-99; chairman of Cenex, Inc., board 1988-98. Previously director for Minnesota Association of Cooperatives, Western Co-op Transport Association and Agland Cooperative. Past chair of Agricultural Council of America and Board of Trustees for CHS Foundation.
Elections are for three-year terms and are open to any eligible candidate. To be eligible, a candidate must meet the following qualifications:
| At the time of the election, the individual must be less than the age of 68. | |
| The individual must be a member of this cooperative or a member of a Cooperative Association Member. | |
| The individual must reside in the region from which he or she is to be elected. | |
| The individual must be an active farmer or rancher. Active farmer or rancher means an individual whose primary occupation is that of a farmer or rancher, excluding any full-time employee of the Company or of a Cooperative Association Member. | |
| The individual must currently be serving or shall have served at least one full term as a director of a Cooperative Association Member of this cooperative. |
43
The following positions on the Board of Directors
will be elected at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Members:
Region
Current Incumbent
Elroy Webster (not seeking re-election)
Duane Stenzel
Leonard Larsen
Merlin Van Walleghen
James Kile
Robert Elliott
The table below lists the executive officers of the Company as of August 31, 2003. Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors.
Name | Age | Position | ||||
|
|
|
||||
John D. Johnson
|
55 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Patrick Kluempke
|
55 | Executive Vice President Corporate Planning | ||||
Tom Larson
|
55 | Executive Vice President Public Affairs | ||||
Mark Palmquist
|
46 | Executive Vice President/ Chief Operating Officer Grains and Foods | ||||
John Schmitz
|
53 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Leon E. Westbrock
|
56 | Executive Vice President/ Chief Operating Officer Energy and Crop Inputs |
John D. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer, was born in Rhame, North Dakota, and grew up in Spearfish, South Dakota. He earned a degree in business administration and a minor in economics from Black Hills State University. In 1976, he joined Harvest States Cooperatives as a feed consultant in the GTA Feeds Division, later becoming regional sales manager, Director of Sales and Marketing and then General Manager of GTA Feeds. In 1992, he was elected Group Vice President of Farm Marketing and Supply for Harvest States Cooperatives and was selected President and CEO in January 1995. Mr. Johnson became President and General Manager of CHS Inc. upon its creation June 1, 1998 and was named President and Chief Executive Officer on June 1, 2000. Mr. Johnson serves on Ventura Foods, LLC, CF Industries, Inc. and National Cooperative Refinery Association boards of directors.
Patrick Kluempke, Executive Vice President of Corporate Planning, was raised on a family dairy farm in central Minnesota, and received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance and Accounting from St. Cloud University and the University of Minnesota. Mr. Kluempke served in the United States Army in South Vietnam and South Korea, as Aide to General J. Guthrie. He began his agribusiness career in grain procurement and merchandising at General Mills and later with Louis Dreyfus Corporation in export marketing. Mr. Kluempke joined the predecessor to CHS when G.T.A. was being merged with North Pacific Grain Growers, in 1983, to form Harvest States Cooperatives and has held various positions in the commodity marketing division and at the corporate level. He was named to the position of Senior Vice President of Corporate Planning and Business Development in 1993 and held that position until 2000 when he was named to his current position. Mr. Kluempke serves on the board of Ventura Foods, LLC.
Tom Larson is Executive Vice President, Public Affairs at CHS. After growing up on a 480-acre crop and hog farm near Slayton, Minnesota, he earned a Bachelors degree in Agriculture Education from South Dakota State University. After working as a vo-ag teacher, he took an agronomy sales position with Cenex, Inc. and later managed the local cooperative at Hoffman, Minnesota, for two years. Mr. Larson
44
Mark Palmquist is the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Grains and Foods. He is responsible for all related areas of grains including country operations, terminal operations, exports, logistics, transportation and grain marketing joint ventures. He is also responsible for the operations of wheat milling, oilseed processing and refining, and food manufacturing and packaging. Mr. Palmquist has worked for CHS for 22 years. Starting as a grain buyer and moving into merchandising, he has traded many different commodities including corn, soybeans and spring wheat. In 1990, he assumed the role of Vice President and director of Grain Marketing and then in 1993, was promoted to Senior Vice President, which he held until 2000 when he was named to his current position. Mr. Palmquist attended Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, Minnesota, graduating in 1979. He also attended the Master of Business Administration program at the University of Minnesota. Mr. Palmquist serves on Ventura Foods, LLC board of directors.
John Schmitz is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Schmitz joined Harvest States Cooperatives in 1974 as Corporate Accountant and has held a number of accounting and finance positions within the Company, including divisional controller positions in Country Services, Farm Marketing & Supply and Grain Marketing. In 1986, he was named Vice President and Controller of Harvest States Cooperatives, and had served in that position up to the time of the merger with Cenex when he became Vice President, Finance, of CHS. In May 1999, Mr. Schmitz became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Schmitz earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from St. Cloud State University, and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Minnesota Society of CPAs and the National Society of Accountants for Cooperatives. Mr. Schmitz serves on National Cooperative Refinery Association, Ventura Foods, LLC, Fin-Ag, Inc. and United Harvest, LLC boards of directors.
Leon E. Westbrock is the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Energy and Crop Inputs for the Company. He joined the cooperative system in 1976 and managed three local cooperatives before joining the regional system. At the regional level, Mr. Westbrock served in the Merchandising Department at Cenex, Inc. and then later as Manager of the Lubricants Department and as Director of Retailing. Since January 1, 1987, he served as Vice President and Executive Vice President in the Energy Division of the Company. On March 1, 2000 Mr. Westbrock was appointed to his current position. He serves as chairman for both National Cooperative Refinery Association and Universal Cooperatives, Inc. boards of directors and also serves as a member of the Agriliance, LLC board of directors. Mr. Westbrock received a Bachelors Degree from St. Cloud State University and served a tour in the U.S. Army.
Based solely upon a review of copies of reports on Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company during, and reports on Form 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to, the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, and based further upon written representations received by the Company with respect to the need to file reports on Form 5, the following persons filed late reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Mr. Stenzel was late in filing a report on Form 4 relating to one transaction in July 2003. Dennis Wendland, Anwer Hussain, John McEnroe and Tim Cauley, all
45
The Company has adopted a code of ethics within the meaning of Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This code of ethics applies to all officers and employees of the Company. The Company will provide to any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of such code of ethics. A person may request a copy by writing or telephoning the Company at the following address:
CHS Inc.
The Companys Board of Directors has a separately designated standing Audit Committee for the purpose of overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the Companys financial statements. The Audit Committee is comprised solely of directors Mr. Bass, Mr. Bielenberg, Mr. Carlson and Mr. Webster, each of whom is an independent director. The Audit Committee has oversight responsibility to the Companys owners relating to the Companys financial statements and the financial reporting process, preparation of the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to any governmental or regulatory body, the systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the internal audit function and the annual independent audit of the Companys financial statements. The Audit Committee assures that the corporate information gathering and reporting systems developed by management represent a good faith attempt to provide senior management and the Board of Directors with information regarding material acts, events and conditions within the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the independent auditors.
The Company does not believe that any member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is an audit committee financial expert as defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations thereunder. As a cooperative, the 17-member Board of Directors is nominated and elected by the Companys members. To ensure geographic representation of the Companys members, the Board of Directors represent eight (8) regions in which the Companys members are located. The members in each region nominate and elect the number of directors for that region as set forth in the Companys bylaws. To be eligible for service as a director, a nominee must (i) be a member of the Company and (ii) reside in the geographic region from which he or she is nominated. Neither management nor the incumbent directors have any control over the nominating process for directors. Because of the eligibility requirements and the election process, the Company cannot ensure that an elected director will be an audit committee financial expert.
However, many of the Companys directors, including all of the Audit Committee members, are financially sophisticated and have experience or background in which they have had significant financial oversight responsibilities. The current Audit Committee includes directors who have served as presidents or chairmen of local cooperative association boards. Members of the Board of Directors, including the Audit Committee, also operate large commercial enterprises requiring expertise in all areas of management, including financial oversight.
Summary Compensation. The following table sets forth the cash and noncash compensation earned by the Chief Executive Officer and each of the executive officers of the Company whose total salary and
46
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Compensation | Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Annual | All Other | LTIP | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year Ended | Salary(1) | Bonus(1) | Compensation(2) | Compensation(3) | Payouts(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
John. D. Johnson
|
8/31/03 | $ | 850,000 | $ | 710,940 | $ | 25,800 | $ | 7,931 | $ | 820,802 | ||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive
|
8/31/02 | 820,000 | 811,750 | 30,376 | 10,216 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Officer
|
8/31/01 | 787,500 | 747,338 | 8,600 | 9,606 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick Kluempke
|
8/31/03 | 230,880 | 145,842 | 15,120 | 7,549 | 166,949 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President
|
8/31/02 | 223,000 | 166,875 | 15,120 | 10,873 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Planning
|
8/31/01 | 200,000 | 162,675 | 3,780 | 6,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tom Larson
|
8/31/03 | 240,000 | 156,966 | 15,120 | 6,104 | 174,763 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President
|
8/31/02 | 229,100 | 172,200 | 18,878 | 10,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Public Affairs
|
8/31/01 | 200,000 | 167,850 | 16,130 | 8,189 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mark Palmquist
|
8/31/03 | 482,400 | 145,323 | 15,120 | 6,938 | 348,215 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and
|
8/31/02 | 453,400 | 342,000 | 15,120 | 11,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer
|
8/31/01 | 375,000 | 232,680 | 14,111 | 5,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grains and Foods
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Schmitz
|
8/31/03 | 410,700 | 268,146 | 15,120 | 7,932 | 285,155 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and
|
8/31/02 | 317,300 | 244,500 | 21,856 | 12,255 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer
|
8/31/01 | 275,000 | 232,500 | 2,520 | 7,080 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Leon E. Westbrock
|
8/31/03 | 482,400 | 344,148 | 15,120 | 6,725 | 348,215 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and
|
8/31/02 | 453,400 | 342,000 | 15,120 | 12,057 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer
|
8/31/01 | 375,000 | 332,400 | 7,320 | 5,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Energy and Crop Inputs
|
(1) | Amounts shown include amounts deferred at the employees election under the Companys Deferred Compensation Program and amounts waived in exchange for options under the Companys Share Option Plan. |
(2) | Amounts shown include personal use of a Company vehicle and/or vehicle allowance. |
(3) | Other compensation includes the Companys matching contributions under the Companys 401(k) Plan and the portion of group term life insurance premiums paid by the Company. |
On November 6, 2003, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John D. Johnson, the President and CEO. The employment agreement provides for a rolling three-year period of employment effective September 1, 2003 at an initial base salary of at least $850,000, subject to annual review. Either party, subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the employment agreement, may terminate Mr. Johnsons employment at any time. The Company is obligated to pay Mr. Johnson a severance allowance of 2.99 times his base salary and target bonus in the event Mr. Johnsons employment is terminated for any reason other than for cause (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), death, disability or voluntary termination, and in the event of the consolidation of the Companys business with the business of any other entity, if Mr. Johnson is not offered the position of Chief Executive Officer of the combined entity. The contract provides for a gross-up for any possible excise tax. Mr. Johnson has also agreed to a non-compete clause of two years, in the event of his termination.
Report on Executive Compensation
The Corporate Responsibility Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, determines the compensation of CHS Inc. chief executive officer and oversees the administration of the executive compensation programs.
47
Executive Compensation Policies and Programs |
CHS Inc. executive compensation programs are designed to attract and retain highly qualified executives and to motivate them to optimize member owner returns by achieving aggressive goals. The compensation program links executive compensation directly to the Companys performance. A significant portion of each executives compensation is dependent upon value-added operations and meeting financial goals and other individual performance objectives.
Each year, the Committee reviews the executive compensation policies with respect to the correlation between executive compensation and the creation of member owner value, as well as the competitiveness of the programs. The Committee determines what, if any, changes are appropriate to executive compensation programs of CHS Inc. The Committee recommends to the total Board of Directors, salary actions relative to the chief executive officer and determines the amount of annual variable pay and the amount of long-term awards.
The Company intends to the extent possible, to preserve the deductibility under the Internal Revenue Code of compensation paid to its executive officers while maintaining compensation programs to attract and retain highly qualified executives in a competitive environment. Accordingly, compensation paid under CHS Inc. share option plan and incentive compensation plan is generally deductible.
Components of Compensation |
There are three basic components to the CHS Inc. executive compensation plan: base pay; annual variable pay; and long-term variable pay (grants in the share option plan). Each component is designed to be competitive within the executive compensation market. In determining competitive compensation levels, the Company analyzes information from several independent compensation surveys, which include information regarding a comparable all-industrial market and other companies that compete for executive talent.
Base Pay: Base pay is designed to be competitive at the 50th percentile of other large companies for equivalent positions. The executives actual salary relative to this competitive benchmark varies based on individual performance and the individuals skills, experience and background.
Annual Variable Pay: Award levels, like the base pay levels, are set with reference to competitive conditions and are intended to motivate the executives by providing substantial incentive payments for the achievement of aggressive goals. The actual amounts paid for 2003 were determined based on two factors: first, profitability and financial performance of the Company and the executives business unit; and second, the individual executives performance against other specific management objectives such as revenue volume growth, value added performance, talent development. Financial objectives are given greater weight than individual performance objectives in determining individual awards. The types and relative importance of specific financial and other business objectives varied among executives depending upon their positions and the particular business unit for which they were responsible.
Long-Term Variable Pay: The main purpose of the long-term variable pay program is to encourage the CHS Inc. executives to increase the value of doing business with the Company by increasing and improving value added business opportunities and therefore the value of member owners doing business with CHS Inc. The long-term variable pay component of the compensation program (through extended vesting) is also designed to create an incentive for the individual to remain with the Company.
The long-term variable pay program consists of grants of shares in the restricted investment corporations sponsored by CHS Inc. These options vest over a multi-year period. The Company periodically grants new awards to provide continuing incentives for future performance. Like the annual variable pay, award levels are set with regard to competitive considerations and each individuals actual award is based on financial performance of the Company, collectively.
48
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer |
In determining the compensation of the chief executive officer, the Committee considers three factors: the absolute and relative performance of the business particularly as it relates to variable pay; the market for such positions; and CHS Inc. compensation strategy in determining the mix of base, annual, and long-term variable pay.
In general, the Companys strategy is to distribute pay for the chief executive officer among the three basic components so that it effectively reflects the competitive market with major consideration for achievement of individual performance objectives.
Mr. Johnsons actual base salary for fiscal year 2003 was $850,000. Based on CHS Inc. financial performance in terms of profitability and other individual goals related to achieving communications objectives, business partner accountability and other strategic objectives, Mr. Johnson received an annual variable pay award of $710,940 and a long-term variable pay award of $820,802 for fiscal year 2003. These incentive payments were consistent with his achievement of performance standards set by the Board of Directors.
The following summarizes certain benefits in effect as of August 31, 2003 to the Named Executive Officers.
Management Compensation Incentive Program |
Each Named Executive Officer is eligible to participate in the Management Compensation Incentive Program (the Incentive Program) for the year ending August 31, 2003. The Incentive Program is based on Company, group or division performance and individual performance. These amounts will be paid after August 31, 2003. The target incentive is 50% of base compensation except for the President and Chief Executive Officer, where target incentive is 67% of base compensation.
Long-Term Incentive Plan |
Each Named Executive Officer is eligible to participate in the Long-Term Incentive Plan. The plan consists of a three-year performance period. Award opportunities are expressed as a percentage of a participating employees position average mid-point. Company performance must meet a minimum level of pre-tax earnings per unit of sales volume and net income levels before any grants are made from this plan. The Board of Directors has discretion to increase or decrease an award up to 20%. Awards from the plan are grants to the Companys Share Option Plan at the end of each plan period.
49
Long-Term Incentive Plans Awards
in Last Fiscal Year
Award
Maturation of
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Name and Principal Position
2001-2003
Award
each year
each year
each year
$
820,802
2001-2003
$
81,417
$
545,492
$
814,167
President and Chief Executive Officer
166,949
2001-2003
16,560
110,952
165,600
Executive Vice President Corporate
Planning
174,763
2001-2003
17,335
116,145
173,350
Executive Vice President Public
Affairs
348,215
2001-2003
34,540
231,418
345,400
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer Grain and Foods
285,155
2001-2003
28,285
189,510
282,850
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
348,215
2001-2003
34,540
231,418
345,400
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer Energy and Crop Inputs
Retirement Plan |
Each of the Named Executive Officers is entitled to receive benefits under the Companys Cash Balance Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan). An employees benefit under the Retirement Plan depends on credits to the employees account, which are based on the employees total salary each year the employee works for the Company, the length of service with the Company and the rate of interest credited to the employees account balance each year. Credits are made to the employees account from Pay Credits, Special Career Credits and Investment Credits.
The amount of Pay Credits added to an employees account each year is a percentage of the employees gross salary, including overtime pay, commissions, severance pay, bonuses, any compensation reduction pursuant to the 401(k) Plan and any pretax contribution to any of the Companys welfare benefit plans, paid vacations, paid leaves of absence and pay received if away from work due to a sickness or injury. The Pay Credits percentage received is determined on a yearly basis, based on the years of Benefit Service completed as of January 1 of each year. An employee receives one year of Benefit Service for every calendar year of employment in which the employee completed at least 1,000 hours of service.
Effective January 1, 2003, Pay Credits are
earned according to the following schedule:
Pay Below Social Security
Pay Above Social Security
Years of Benefit Service
Taxable Wage Base
Taxable Wage Base
3%
6%
4%
8%
5%
10%
6%
12%
7%
14%
The Company credits an employees account at the end of the year with an Investment Credit based on the balance at the beginning of the year. The Investment Credit is based on the average return for one-year U.S. Treasury Bills for the preceding 12-month period. The maximum Investment Credit will not exceed 12% for any year.
50
As of December 31, 2002, the dollar value of
the account and years of service for each of the Named Executive
Officers was:
Dollar Value
Years of Service
$
990,480
27
484,691
20
441,526
26
540,524
23
466,773
28
1,051,770
22
Share Option Plan |
In October 1997, the Company adopted a Share Option Plan. Participants in the plan, which include all Named Executive Officers, are select management of the Company who have been designated as eligible by the President of the Company to participate in such plan. The Share Option Plan allows participants to waive bonuses and up to 30 percent of salary in exchange for options to purchase, at a discount, shares of selected mutual funds. The Company has filed a Form S-8, dated December 12, 1997 on this program. This plan allows officers to buy investments at a specific price. Some options have vesting schedules.
The following is a share option grants table
showing each Named Executive Officer option activity for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2003. The dollars in the
Realizable Value columns of the table are computed
as of the expiration date. All grants are salary exchanges, and
not additional income to the employee.
Number of
% of Total
$ Exercise
Expiration
Realizable
Realizable
Realizable
Name
Securities
Options
Price
Date
Value 5%
Value 10%
Value 0%
9.578.554
43.96%
$
7.83
9/30/2022
$
198,997
$
504,563
$
56,250
131,033.091
26.46%
8.26
11/07/2022
2,871,753
7,281,397
811,750
9,168.704
43.96%
8.18
12/31/2022
198,997
504,563
56,250
12,531.328
13.48%
7.98
3/31/2023
265,330
672,750
75,000
11,123.471
52.41%
8.99
6/30/2023
265,330
672,750
75,000
28,933.680
5.44%
7.69
11/07/2022
590,359
1,496,869
166,875
944.510
4.69%
8.47
9/30/2022
21,226
53,850
6,000
25,997.719
5.57%
8.77
11/07/2022
604,952
1,533,870
171,000
912.201
4.69%
8.77
12/31/2022
21,226
53,820
6,000
7,434.436
1.59%
8.77
11/07/2022
172,995
438,633
48,900
42,978.322
11.15%
10.61
11/07/2022
1,209,904
3,067,740
342,000
51
The following is a share option grants table
showing each Named Executive Officer, along with the number and
value of shares exercised for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2003, and the number of underlying unexercised
options and the value of unexercised in-the-money options, as of
the most recent statement period ended June 30, 2003.
Number of
Number of
Value of
Value of
Securities
Securities
Unexercised
Unexercised
Number of
Value of
Underlying
Underlying
In-the-Money
In-the-Money
Shares
Shares
Options
Options
Options
Options
Name
Exercised
Exercised
Exercisable
Unexercisable
Exercisable
Unexercisable
470,532.389
23,654.799
$
4,390,067
$
220,699
81,521.058
$
600,810
50,596.492
444,237
56,364.534
494,881
58,291.716
524,611
3,549.270
34,641
41,731.660
407,301
73,260.073
600,000
449,277.209
4,052,959
401(k) Plan |
Each Named Executive Officer is eligible to participate in the CHS Inc. Savings Plan (the 401(k) Plan). All benefit-eligible employees of the Company are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. Effective January 1, 2002, participants may contribute between 1% and 50% (not to exceed the IRS limits on benefits in the case of highly compensated employees) of their pay on a pre-tax basis. Each of the Named Executive Officers is a highly compensated employee. The Company matches 50% of the first 6% of pay contributed each year. The Companys Board of Directors may elect to reduce or eliminate matching contributions for any year or any portion thereof. Participants are 100% vested in their own contributions and are fully vested after three years of service in any Company matching contribution made on the participants behalf.
Deferred Compensation Supplemental Retirement Plan |
Each of the Named Executive Officers may participate in the Companys Deferred Compensation Supplemental Retirement Plan (the Supplemental Plan). Participants in the Supplemental Plan are select management or highly compensated employees of the Company who have been designated as eligible by the President of the Company to participate in such plan. Compensation waived under the Share Option Plan is not eligible for Pay Credits under the Cash Balance Retirement Plan or matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan. The Supplemental Plan is intended to replace the benefits lost under those plans due to Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) which cannot be considered for purposes of benefits due to Section 401(a)(17) of the Code under the qualified plans that the Company offers. The Supplemental Plan is not funded or qualified for special tax treatment under the Code.
In addition, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company is eligible to participate in the Companys Special Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the Special Supplemental Plan). The special supplemental retirement benefit will be credited at the end of each plan year for which the participant completes a year of service. The amount credited shall be an amount equal to that set forth in a schedule of benefits stated in the Special Supplemental Plan. The Special Supplemental Plan is not funded or qualified for special tax treatment under the Code.
52
As of December 31, 2002, the dollar value of
the account of each of the Named Executive Officers was
approximately:
Special
Supplemental Plan
Supplemental Plan
$
1,904,914
$0
91,160
N/A
396,566
N/A
253,641
N/A
199,830
N/A
1,274,612
N/A
Directors Compensation |
The Board of Directors met monthly during the year ended August 31, 2003. Through August 31, 2003, the Company provided each director with compensation of $42,000, paid in twelve monthly payments, with; the Chairman of the Board receiving an additional annual compensation of $12,000, the First Vice Chairman receiving an additional annual compensation of $3,600, and the Secretary-Treasurer receiving an additional annual compensation of $1,800. Each director receives a per diem of $300 plus actual expenses and travel allowance for each day spent on Company meetings (other than regular Board meetings and the Annual Meeting), life insurance and health and dental insurance. Each director has a retirement benefit of $175 per month per year of service, with a maximum benefit of $2,625 per month, for life with a guarantee of 120 months (paid to beneficiary in the event of death). This benefit commences at age 60 or retirement, whichever is later. This retirement benefit may be converted to a lump sum. The retired directors may also continue health benefits until eligible for Medicare and thereafter pay at their own expense for a Medicare supplemental policy.
Committees of the Board of Directors |
The Board of Directors appoints ad hoc committees from time to time to review certain matters and make reports and recommendations to the full Board of Directors for action. The entire Board of Directors determines the salaries and incentive compensation for the President and Chief Executive Officer using industry and compensation studies. The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee to review the results and scope of the annual audit and other services provided by the Companys independent auditors, and another standing committee to review equity redemption policy and its application to situations believed by the equity holder or patrons equity department to be unusual.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
As noted above, the Companys Board of Directors does not have a Compensation Committee. The entire Board of Directors determined the compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and the terms of the employment agreement with the President and Chief Executive Officer. The President and Chief Executive Officer determined the compensation for all other executive officers.
53
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Beneficial ownership of equity securities as of
August 31, 2003 is shown below:
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Title of Class
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
Ownership
% of Class
Directors:
Michael Toelle
420 shares
*
Bruce Anderson
40 shares
*
Robert Bass
120 shares
*
David Bielenberg
1,200 shares
*
Dennis Carlson
460 shares
*
Curt Eischens
120 shares
*
Robert Elliott
640 shares
*
Robert Grabarski
2,280 shares
*
Jerry Hasnedl
200 shares
*
Glen Keppy
200 shares
*
James Kile
120 shares
*
Randy Knecht
240 shares
*
Leonard Larsen
200 shares
*
Richard Owen
240 shares
*
Duane Stenzel
600 shares
*
Merlin Van Walleghen
1,600 shares
*
Elroy Webster
400 shares
*
Named Executive Officers:
John D. Johnson
2,800 shares
*
Patrick Kluempke
1,000 shares
*
Tom Larson
400 shares
*
Mark Palmquist
1,200 shares
*
John Schmitz
1,400 shares
*
Leon E. Westbrock
800 shares
*
Directors and executive officers as a group
16,680 shares
*
(1) | Includes shares held by spouse and children. |
* Less than 1%.
The Company has no compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Because directors must be active patrons of the Company or an affiliated association, transactions between the Company and directors are customary and expected. Transactions include the sale of commodities to the Company and the purchase of products and services from the Company, as well as patronage refunds and equity redemptions received from the Company. During the period indicated, the value of those transactions between a particular director (and members of such directors immediate family, which includes such directors spouse; parents; children; siblings; mothers and fathers-in-law; sons
54
Year Ended | ||||
Name | August 31, 2003 | |||
|
|
|||
Bruce Anderson
|
$ | 71,890 | ||
Curt Eischens
|
188,942 | |||
Jerry Hasnedl
|
575,322 | |||
Leonard Larsen
|
269,720 | |||
Merlin Van Walleghen
|
149,776 |
The following table shows the aggregate fees
billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers for services
rendered during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2003 and
2002:
Description of Fees
2003
2002
$
707,901
$
592,525
197,560
64,273
138,109
168,671
$
1,043,570
$
825,469
(1) | Includes fees for audit of annual financial statements and reviews of the related quarterly financial statements. |
(2) | Includes fees for certain statutory audits, employee benefit plan audits, work related to S-2 filings and other accounting consultations. |
(3) | Includes fees related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
The Company adopted a policy that the Audit Committee must approve in advance, all audit and non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers. The Audit Committee approved all of the services.
55
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Reports Filed on Form 8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following financial statements and the Reports of Independent Accountants are filed as part of this Form 10-K.
Page No. | |||||
|
|||||
CHS Inc.
|
|||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31,
2003 and 2002
|
F-1 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
|
F-2 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Equities and
Comprehensive Income for the years ended August 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001
|
F-3 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
|
F-4 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-5 | ||||
Report of Independent Accountants
|
F-29 | ||||
VENTURA FOODS, LLC, a non-consolidated 50%
owned equity investment
|
|||||
Independent Auditors Report
|
F-30 | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31,
2003 and 2002
|
F-31 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years
ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended
March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000
|
F-32 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Members Capital
for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three
months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended
December 31, 2000
|
F-33 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended
March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000
|
F-34 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months
ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31,
2000
|
F-35 |
* | Audited financial statements for Ventura Foods, LLC, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2004 will be filed by an amendment to this Form 10-K. |
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
3.1
Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as
amended.(13)
3.2
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation.(18)
3.3
Bylaws of the Company, as amended.(13)
4.1
Resolution Creating a Series of Preferred Equity
to be Designated 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.(14)
4.2
Unanimous Written Consent Resolution of the Board
of Directors of Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Amending the
Amended and Restated Resolution Creating a Series of Preferred
Equity to be Designated 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock.(15)
4.3
Resolution amending a previous Preferred Stock
Resolution with respect to the record date for payment of
dividends for the Companys 8% Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.(17)
4.4
Form of Certificate Representing 8% Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock.(15)
10.1
Lease between the Port of Kalama and North
Pacific Grain Growers, Inc., dated November 22, 1960.(1)
10.2
Limited Liability Company Agreement for the
Wilsey-Holsum Foods, LLC dated July 24, 1996.(1)
56
10.3
Long Term Supply Agreement between Wilsey-Holsum
Foods, LLC and Harvest States Cooperatives dated August 30,
1996.(*)(1)
10.4
TEMCO, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement
between Cargill, Incorporated and Cenex Harvest States
Cooperatives dated as of August 26, 2002.(12)
10.5
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Supplemental
Savings Plan.(7)
10.6
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan.(7)
10.7
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Senior
Management Compensation Plan.(7)
10.8
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Executive
Long-Term Variable Compensation Plan.(7)
10.9
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Share Option
Plan.(7)
10.9A
Amendment to Cenex Harvest States Share Option
Plan, dated June 28, 2001.(10)
10.10
$225,000,000 Note Agreement (Private Placement
Agreement) dated as of June 19, 1998 among Cenex Harvest
States Cooperatives and each of the Purchasers of the Notes.(2)
10.10A
First Amendment to Note Agreement ($225,000,000
Private Placement), effective September 10, 2003, among CHS
Inc. and each of the Purchasers of the notes.(19)
10.11
Credit Agreement (Revolving Loan) dated as of
May 21, 2003 among Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives,
CoBank, ACB, SunTrust Bank, Cooperatieve Centrale
Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., BNP Paribas and the Syndication
Parties.(17)
10.12
$200 Million Term Loan Credit Agreement dated as
of June 1, 1998 among Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives,
CoBank, ACB, and St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives, including
Exhibit 2.4 (form of $200 Million Promissory Note).(2)
10.12A
First Amendment to Credit Agreement (Term Loan),
effective as of May 31, 1999 among Cenex Harvest States
Cooperatives, CoBank, ACB, and St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives.(4)
10.12B
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (Term Loan)
dated May 23, 2000 by and among Cenex Harvest States
Cooperatives, CoBank, ACB, St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives
and the Syndication Parties.(6)
10.12C
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (Term Loan)
dated May 23, 2001 among Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives,
CoBank, ACB, and the Syndication Parties.(9)
10.12D
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement (Term Loan)
dated May 22, 2002 among Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives,
CoBank, ACB and the Syndication Parties.(11)
10.13
Limited Liability Agreement of United Harvest,
LLC dated November 9, 1998 between United Grain Corporation
and Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives.(3)
10.14
Joint Venture Agreement for Agriliance LLC, dated
as of January 1, 2000 among Farmland Industries, Inc.,
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives, United Country Brands, LLC
and Land O Lakes, Inc.(5)
10.15
Employment Agreement dated November 6, 2003
by and between John D. Johnson and CHS Inc.(19)
10.16
CHS Inc. Special Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan.(19)
10.17
Note purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated
as of January 10, 2001 between Cenex Harvest States
Cooperatives and The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(8)
10.17A
Amendment No. 1 to Note Purchase and Private
Shelf Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2001.(8)
10.18
Note Purchase Agreement and Series D & E
Senior Notes dated October 18, 2002.(12)
10.19
2002 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(364-Day Revolving Loan) dated December 17, 2002 by and
among National Cooperative Refinery Association, CoBank, ACB and
Farm Credit Bank of Wichita, D/B/A U.S. AgBank, FCB.(16)
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.(19)
23.1
Consent of Independent Accountants.(19)
23.2
Independent Auditors Consent.(19)
24.1
Power of Attorney.(19)
31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(19)
57
31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(19)
32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(19)
32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(19)
99.1
Cautionary Statement.(19)
(*) | Pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, confidential portions of Exhibit 10.3 have been deleted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-17865), filed February 7, 1997. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q Transition Report for the period June 1, 1998 to August 31, 1998, filed October 14, 1998. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 1998, filed January 13, 1999. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 1999, filed July 13, 1999. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 29, 2000 filed April 11, 2000. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2000, filed July 10, 2000. |
(7) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2000, filed November 22, 2000. |
(8) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2001, filed April 10, 2001. |
(9) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2001, filed July 3, 2001. |
(10) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 333-65364), filed October 26, 2001. |
(11) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2002, filed July 3, 2002. |
(12) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2002, filed November 25, 2002. |
(13) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2002, filed January 9, 2003. |
(14) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 333-101916), dated January 13, 2003. |
(15) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 333-101916), dated January 23, 2003. |
(16) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2003, filed April 4, 2003. |
(17) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2003, filed July 2, 2003. |
(18) | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2003. |
(19) | Filed herewith. |
58
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On August 5, 2003 the Company filed a report on Form 8-K announcing the Companys name change from Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives to CHS Inc. This was the only report on Form 8-K filed during the fourth quarter.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits shown in Item 15(a)(3) above are being filed herewith.
(d) Schedules
None.
Supplemental Information
As a cooperative, the Company does not utilize proxy statements.
59
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November 21, 2003.
CHS INC. |
By: | /s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON |
|
|
John D. Johnson | |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on November 21, 2003:
Signature | Title | |||
|
|
|||
/s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON
John D. Johnson |
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) |
|||
/s/ JOHN SCHMITZ
John Schmitz |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
(principal financial officer) |
|||
/s/ JODELL HELLER
Jodell Heller |
Vice President and Controller
(principal accounting officer) |
|||
Michael Toelle* | Chairman of the Board of Directors | |||
Bruce Anderson* | Director | |||
Robert Bass* | Director | |||
David Bielenberg* | Director | |||
Dennis Carlson* | Director | |||
Curt Eischens* | Director | |||
Robert Elliott* | Director | |||
Robert Grabarski* | Director | |||
Jerry Hasnedl* | Director | |||
Glen Keppy* | Director | |||
James Kile* | Director | |||
Randy Knecht* | Director | |||
Leonard Larsen* | Director | |||
Richard Owen* | Director | |||
Duane Stenzel* | Director | |||
Merlin Van Walleghen* | Director | |||
Elroy Webster* | Director | |||
*By: |
/s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON
John D. Johnson Attorney-in-fact |
60
CHS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
August 31
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
$
168,249
$
108,192
763,780
741,578
801,883
759,663
178,661
140,944
1,912,573
1,750,377
532,893
496,607
1,122,982
1,057,421
239,520
177,322
$
3,807,968
$
3,481,727
LIABILITIES AND EQUITIES
$
251,131
$
332,514
14,951
89,032
58,417
26,461
123,383
169,123
85,239
84,251
627,250
517,667
254,415
225,704
39,049
56,510
1,453,835
1,501,262
648,222
483,092
111,555
118,280
112,645
89,455
1,481,711
1,289,638
$
3,807,968
$
3,481,727
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-1
CHS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
For the years ended August 31
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
9,270,734
$
7,156,454
$
7,464,242
3,257
3,885
5,977
124,542
109,459
116,254
9,398,533
7,269,798
7,586,473
9,058,951
6,940,926
7,181,433
190,582
187,292
184,046
149,000
141,580
220,994
(10,867
)
(2,970
)
48,675
42,455
61,436
(47,299
)
(58,133
)
(28,494
)
21,950
15,390
35,098
136,541
144,838
152,954
12,700
18,700
(25,600
)
$
123,841
$
126,138
$
178,554
$
90,000
$
92,900
$
128,900
33,841
33,238
49,654
$
123,841
$
126,138
$
178,554
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-2
CHS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITIES
Oilseed
Accumulated
Capital
Nonpatronage
Wheat
Processing
Unallocated
Other
Allocated
Equity
Equity
Preferred
Milling
& Refining
Patronage
Capital
Comprehensive
Capital
Total
Certificates
Certificates
Stock
EPUs
EPUs
Refunds
Reserve
Income (Loss)
Reserve
Equities
(dollars in thousands)
$
940,880
$
28,509
$
9,246
$
4,182
$
61,180
$
114,736
$
(2,427
)
$
8,120
$
1,164,426
17,474
26,220
43,694
60,304
(87,400
)
967
(26,129
)
(18,662
)
(74
)
(18,736
)
5,481
5,481
1,045
(1,045
)
(9,066
)
(5,227
)
(14,293
)
(120
)
(277
)
(180
)
445
(70
)
(202
)
128,900
49,654
178,554
512
512
179,066
(33,484
)
(38,670
)
(72,154
)
971,873
28,158
90,230
164,757
(1,915
)
8,050
1,261,153
33,484
38,670
72,154
92,484
(128,900
)
(3,666
)
(40,082
)
(31,099
)
(46
)
(31,145
)
2,600
2,600
$
9,325
(3,428
)
5,897
(240
)
(240
)
(106
)
(339
)
100
(345
)
92,900
33,238
126,138
(49,982
)
(49,982
)
76,156
(28,640
)
(27,870
)
(56,510
)
1,040,596
27,773
9,325
65,030
190,761
(51,897
)
8,050
1,289,638
28,639
27,870
56,509
61,784
(92,900
)
4,638
(26,478
)
(31,092
)
(52
)
(31,144
)
350
350
86,379
(3,895
)
82,484
(2,002
)
(2,002
)
(3,575
)
(3,575
)
(2,440
)
(3
)
(4
)
(2,447
)
90,000
33,841
123,841
33,584
33,584
157,425
(10,800
)
(27,000
)
(1,249
)
(39,049
)
$
1,087,037
$
27,718
$
93,702
$
$
$
63,000
$
220,517
$
(18,313
)
$
8,050
$
1,481,711
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CHS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
For the years ended August 31
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
123,841
$
126,138
$
178,554
111,347
103,986
109,180
(47,299
)
(58,133
)
(28,494
)
21,950
15,390
35,098
(1,795
)
(2,327
)
(3,896
)
741
(6,418
)
(13,941
)
9,000
4,400
(46,625
)
4,052
5,467
(801
)
(18,669
)
(32,517
)
147,922
(25,692
)
(255,107
)
39,248
(83,347
)
(86,636
)
(24,128
)
30,238
(12,025
)
1,707
(45,740
)
59,988
(22,800
)
135,310
92,781
(130,142
)
2,569
9,079
13,050
216,506
(35,934
)
253,932
(175,689
)
(140,169
)
(97,610
)
26,886
20,205
35,263
(43,478
)
(6,211
)
(14,247
)
35,939
37,689
30,104
8,467
6,310
1,672
(6,630
)
(22,031
)
533
(767
)
(29,501
)
(7,328
)
(13,030
)
(5,750
)
(1,103
)
(4,444
)
(7,413
)
(19,256
)
(507
)
(685
)
1,775
(173,253
)
(147,556
)
(70,197
)
(81,383
)
235,319
(120,731
)
175,000
30,000
116,861
(89,512
)
(17,968
)
(67,364
)
(7,574
)
988
(3,557
)
3,722
82,484
5,897
(2,002
)
(3,575
)
(240
)
(31,144
)
(31,145
)
(18,736
)
(14,293
)
(26,478
)
(40,082
)
(26,129
)
16,804
178,224
(126,670
)
60,057
(5,266
)
57,065
108,192
113,458
56,393
$
168,249
$
108,192
$
113,458
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CHS INC.
Effective August 5, 2003, Cenex Harvest
States Cooperatives changed its name to CHS Inc. (CHS or the
Company). CHS is an agricultural cooperative organized for the
mutual benefit of its members. Members of the cooperative are
located throughout the United States. In addition to grain
marketing, oilseed processing and refining, foods and wheat
milling, the Company provides its patrons with energy and
agronomy products as well as other farm supplies. Sales are both
domestic and international.
Effective September 1, 2000, the
Companys Board of Directors approved a resolution
providing for the computation of patronage distributions based
on earnings for financial statement purposes rather than federal
income tax basis earnings. On December 1, 2000, this
resolution was ratified by the Companys members, the
by-laws were amended and beginning with fiscal year 2001
patronage distributions have been calculated based on financial
statement earnings. The by-laws further provide that an amount
of up to 10% of the distributable annual net savings from
patronage sources be added to the unallocated capital reserve as
determined by the Board of Directors.
The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of CHS and all of its wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries, including National Cooperative Refinery
Association (NCRA). The effects of all significant intercompany
transactions have been eliminated.
On September 1, 1999, NCRA and Farmland
Industries, Inc. (Farmland) formed Cooperative Refining, LLC
(CRLLC), which was established to operate and manage the
refineries and related pipelines and terminals of NCRA and
Farmland. On December 31, 2000, NCRA and Farmland signed an
Agreement of Dissolution and dissolved CRLLC.
During 2000, the Company entered into a series of
transactions, the result of which was the exchange of its
agronomy operations, consisting primarily of its interests in
and ownership of the Cenex/ Land OLakes Agronomy Company
and Agro Distribution, LLC and related entities for a 25% equity
ownership interest in Agriliance, LLC (Agriliance). Agriliance
is a distributor of crop nutrients, crop protection products and
other agronomy inputs and services formerly owned by the
Company, Land OLakes, Inc. (Land OLakes) and
Farmland. The company accounts for the Agriliance investment
under the equity method.
During 2003 and 2002, the Company had various
other acquisitions, which have been accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting. Operating results of the
acquisitions are included in the consolidated financial
statements since the respective acquisition dates. The
respective purchase prices were allocated to the assets and
liabilities acquired based upon the estimated fair values. The
excess purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net
assets acquired has been reported as identifiable intangible
assets and goodwill.
Cash equivalents include short-term highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less at
date of acquisition.
Grain, processed grain, oilseed and processed
oilseed are stated at net realizable values which approximates
market values. All other inventories are stated at the lower of
cost or market. Costs for inventories produced or modified by
the Company through a manufacturing process include fixed and
F-5
variable production costs and raw material costs,
and in-bound freight costs for raw materials over the amount
charged to cost of goods sold. Costs for inventories purchased
for resale include the cost of products and any freight incurred
to place the products at the Companys point of sales. The
cost of certain energy inventories (wholesale refined products,
crude oil and asphalt) is determined on the last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method; all other inventories of non-grain products
purchased for resale are valued on the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) and average cost methods.
The Company enters into exchange-traded commodity
futures and options contracts to hedge its exposure to price
fluctuations on energy, grain and oilseed transactions to the
extent considered practicable for minimizing risk. Futures and
options contracts used for hedging are purchased and sold
through regulated commodity exchanges. Fluctuations in inventory
valuations, however, may not be completely hedged, due in part
to the absence of satisfactory hedging facilities for certain
commodities and geographical areas and in part to the
Companys assessment of its exposure from expected price
fluctuations. The Company also manages its risks by entering
into fixed price purchase contracts with pre-approved producers
and establishing appropriate limits for individual suppliers.
Fixed price sales contracts are entered into with customers of
acceptable creditworthiness, as internally evaluated. The
Company is exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the
counterparties to the contracts; however, the Company does not
anticipate nonperformance by counterparties.
Commodity trading in futures and options
contracts is a natural extension of cash market trading. The
commodity futures and options markets have underlying principles
of increased liquidity and longer trading periods than the cash
market, and hedging is one method of reducing exposure to price
fluctuations. The Companys use of the derivative
instruments described above reduces the effects of price
volatility, thereby protecting against adverse short-term price
movements while somewhat limiting the benefits of short-term
price movements. Changes in market value of derivative
instruments described above are recognized in the consolidated
statements of operations in the period such changes occur. The
fair value of futures and options contracts are determined
primarily from quotes listed on regulated commodity exchanges.
Fixed price purchase and sales contracts are with various
counterparties, and the fair values of such contracts are
determined from the market price of the underlying product. At
August 31, 2003, the Companys derivative assets and
liabilities were $54.5 million and $46.5 million,
respectively. At August 31, 2002, the Companys
derivative assets and liabilities were $53.8 million and
$67.9 million, respectively.
The Company utilizes futures and options
contracts offered through regulated commodity exchanges to
reduce price risk. The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the
market value of inventories and fixed or partially fixed
purchase and sale contracts. In order to reduce that risk, the
Company generally takes opposite and offsetting positions using
futures contracts or options. Certain commodities cannot be
hedged with futures or options contracts because such contracts
are not offered for these commodities by regulated commodity
exchanges. Inventories and purchase contracts for those
commodities are hedged with forward sales contracts, to the
extent practical, in order to arrive at a net commodity position
within the formal position limits set by the Company and deemed
prudent for each of those commodities. Commodities for which
future contracts and options are available are also typically
hedged with forward contracts, with futures and options used to
hedge within position limits the remaining portion. These
futures and options contracts and forward purchase and sales
contracts used to hedge against commodity price changes are
effective economic hedges of price risk, but they are not
designated as, and accounted for as, hedging instruments for
accounting purposes.
Unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts
and options used as economic hedges of grain and oilseed
inventories and fixed price contracts are recognized in cost of
goods sold for financial reporting on a
F-6
monthly basis using market based prices.
Inventories and fixed price contracts are marked to fair value
using market based prices so that gains or losses on the
derivative contracts are offset by gains or losses on
inventories and fixed price contracts during the same accounting
period.
Unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts
and options used as economic hedges of energy inventories and
fixed price contracts are recognized in cost of goods sold for
financial reporting on a monthly basis using market based
prices. The inventories hedged with these derivatives are valued
at the lower of cost or market, and fixed price contracts are
marked to fair value using market based prices. Certain fixed
price contracts related to propane in the Energy segment meet
the normal purchase and sales exemption, and thus are not
required to be marked to fair value.
The Company manages interest expense using fixed
and floating rate debt. These debt instruments are carried at
amounts approximating estimated fair value. Short-term debt used
to finance inventories and receivables is represented by notes
payable within thirty days or less so that the blended interest
rate to the Company for all such notes approximates current
market rates. Long-term debt used to finance non-current assets
has various fixed interest rates and is payable at various dates
as to minimize the effect of market interest rate changes. The
effective interest rate to the Company on fixed rate debt
outstanding on August 31, 2003, was approximately 6.5%.
In August 2002, the Company entered into interest
rate treasury lock instruments to secure the interest rate
related to a portion of its private placement debt issued on
October 18, 2002. These instruments were designated and are
effective as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, and
accordingly, the loss on settlement was recorded as a component
of other comprehensive income. Interest expense for the year
ended August 31, 2003, includes $0.7 million related
to the interest rate derivatives. The additional interest
expense is an offset to the lower actual interest paid on the
outstanding debt instruments.
The Company conducts essentially all of its
business in U.S. dollars except for grain marketing operations
in Brazil, and had minimal risk regarding foreign currency
fluctuations during 2003. Foreign currency fluctuations do,
however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase U.S.
agricultural products and the competitiveness of U.S.
agricultural products compared to the same products offered by
alternative sources of world supply.
Investments in other cooperatives are stated at
cost, plus patronage dividends received in the form of capital
stock and other equities. Patronage dividends are recorded at
the time qualified written notices of allocation are received.
Joint ventures and other investments, in which the Company has
significant ownership and influence, but not control, are
accounted for in the consolidated financial statements under the
equity method of accounting. Investments in other debt and
equity securities are considered available for sale financial
instruments and are stated at market value, with unrealized
amounts included as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss).
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost
less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and
amortization are provided on the straight-line method by charges
to operations at rates based upon the expected useful lives of
individual or groups of assets (primarily 15 to 40 years
for land improvements and buildings and 3 to 20 years for
machinery, equipment, office and other). The cost and
F-7
related accumulated depreciation and amortization
of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the
related accounts and resulting gains or losses are reflected in
operations. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs and minor
renewals are expensed, while costs of major renewals and
betterments are capitalized.
The Company periodically reviews property, plant
and equipment and other long-lived assets in order to assess
recoverability based on projected income and related cash flows
on an undiscounted basis. Should the sum of the expected future
net cash flows be less than the carrying value, an impairment
loss would be recognized. An impairment loss would be measured
by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds
the fair value of the asset.
Effective September 1, 2001, the Company
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. This statement discontinued the
amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets,
subject to periodic impairment testing. At August 31, 2001,
goodwill (net of accumulated amortization) prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 142, was $29.2 million and was included as
a component of other assets. The effect of adopting the new
standard will reduce goodwill amortization expense by
approximately $2.0 million annually. No changes to the
carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets were
required as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142.
Subsequent impairment testing is performed annually as well as
when a triggering event indicating impairment may have occurred.
During 2003, as a result of the impairment testing, the Company
believes that no impairments are required.
In 2001, the Company recorded goodwill
amortization expense of $2.6 million. Had SFAS No. 142
been in effect during the year ended August 31, 2001, net
income would have been $181.1 million.
The Company provides a wide variety of products
and services, from agricultural inputs such as fuels, farm
supplies and crop nutrients, to agricultural outputs that
include grain and oilseed, processed grains and oilseeds and
food products. Grain and oilseed sales are recorded after the
commodity has been delivered to its destination and final
weights, grades and settlement price have been agreed upon. All
other sales are recognized upon transfer of title, which could
occur upon either shipment or receipt by the customer, depending
upon the contract. Amounts billed to a customer as part of a
sales transaction related to shipping and handling are included
in net sales. Service revenues are recorded only after such
services have been rendered, and are included in other revenues.
Liabilities, including legal costs, related to
remediation of contaminated properties are recognized when the
related costs are considered probable and can be reasonably
estimated. Estimates of environmental costs are based on current
available facts, existing technology, undiscounted site-specific
costs and currently enacted laws and regulations. Recoveries, if
any, are recorded in the period in which recovery is considered
probable. Liabilities are monitored and adjusted as new facts or
changes in law or technology occur. Environmental expenditures
are capitalized when such costs provide future economic benefits.
The Company is a nonexempt agricultural
cooperative and files a consolidated federal income tax return
with its 80% or more owned subsidiaries. The Company is subject
to tax on income from nonpatronage sources and undistributed
patronage-sourced income. Deferred income taxes reflect the
F-8
impact of temporary differences between the
amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial
reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for federal and
state income tax purposes, at each year end, based on enacted
tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in
which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.
Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Comprehensive income (defined as the change in
equity of a business enterprise during a period from sources
other than those resulting from investments by owners and
distribution to owners), primarily includes net income and the
effects of minimum pension liability adjustments. Total
comprehensive income is reflected in the consolidated statements
of equities and comprehensive income.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
During 2003, the Company adopted SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement
costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The
Companys Energy segment operates oil refineries and
related pipelines for which the Company would be subject to
Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) if such assets were to be
dismantled. The Company, however, expects to operate its
refineries and related pipelines indefinitely. Since the time
period to dismantle these assets is indeterminate, a
corresponding ARO is not estimable and therefore has not been
recorded.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. The interpretation addresses
consolidation of certain entities in which equity investors do
not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest
or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to
finance its activities without additional subordinated financial
support from other parties. It also requires consolidation by
primary beneficiary. The interpretation applies immediately to
variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003,
and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains
an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year
or interim period beginning after December 15, 2003, to
variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a
variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003.
The Company believes that the effects of adopting this standard
will not have a material effect on the Company.
On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS
No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded
in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS
No. 133. The new guidance amends SFAS No. 133 for
decisions made as part of the Derivatives Implementation Group
process that effectively required amendments to SFAS
No. 133, and decisions made in connection with other FASB
projects dealing with financial instruments and in connection
with implementation issues raised in relation to the application
of the definition of a derivative and characteristics of a
derivative that contains financing components. In addition, it
clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component that
warrants special reporting in the statements of cash flows.
F-9
SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts
entered into or modified and for hedging relationships
designated after June 30, 2003. The Company believes that
the effects of adopting this standard do not have a material
effect on the Company.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, which
establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures
certain financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a
financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or
an asset in certain circumstances). Many of those instruments
were previously classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is
effective for financial instruments entered into or modified
after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the
beginning of the first interim period beginning after
June 15, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial
instruments of nonpublic entities which are subject to the
provisions for the first fiscal period beginning after
December 15, 2003. The Statement is to be implemented by
reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting
principle for financial instruments created before the issuance
date of the Statement and still existing at the beginning of the
interim period of adoption. The Company believes that the
effects of adopting this standard will not have a material
effect on the Company.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior
years amounts to conform to current year classifications.
In addition, the Company has made changes to net sales and cost
of goods sold for years ended August 31, 2002 and 2001, to
eliminate certain intercompany sales identified subsequent to
the issuance of the 2002 Annual Report. These reclassifications
and changes had no effect on previously reported net income,
equities and comprehensive income, or cash flows.
2. Receivables:
Receivables as of August 31, 2003 and 2002
are as follows:
All international sales are denominated in U.S.
dollars. International sales for the years ended August 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
F-10
3. Inventories:
Inventories as of August 31, 2003 and 2002
are as follows:
As of August 31, 2003, the Company valued
approximately 24% of inventories, primarily related to energy,
using the lower of cost, determined on the LIFO method, or
market (26% as of August 31, 2002). If the FIFO method of
accounting for these inventories had been used, inventories
would have been higher than the reported amount by
$86.3 million and $40.5 million at August 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
4. Investments:
Investments as of August 31, 2003 and 2002
are as follows:
CHSs investment in CF Industries, Inc. (CF)
is carried at cost, including allocated patronage refunds. Since
CF is a cooperative, CHS recognizes income from this investment
only when patronage refunds are received. Over the past
five years CF has generated operating losses, none of which
were allocated to its owners. CHS management has performed the
appropriate impairment tests of this investment, and based upon
those tests, believes that fair market value exceeds its
carrying value. CHS will continue to perform impairment tests
annually, including reviewing operating results, or as
circumstances dictate, which could result in an impairment to
its CF investment.
F-11
In March 2000, the Company purchased an
additional 10% interest in Ventura Foods, LLC, its consumer
products and packaging joint venture, for $25.6 million, of
which $13.8 million was goodwill. The Company has a 50%
interest in this joint venture. The following provides
summarized unaudited financial information for Ventura Foods,
LLC balance sheets as of August 31, 2003 and 2002, and
statements of operations for the twelve months ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
Effective January 1, 2000, CHS, Farmland and
Land OLakes created Agriliance, a distributor of crop
nutrients, crop protection products and other agronomy inputs
and services. At formation, Agriliance managed the agronomy
marketing and distribution operations of CHS (which included
principally its wholesale agronomy, Cenex/Land OLakes
Agronomy Company and Agro Distribution, LLC business
operations), Farmland and Land OLakes, with the Company
exchanging the right to use its agronomy operations for 26.455%
of the results of the jointly managed operations.
In March 2000, the Company sold 1.455% of its
economic interest in the operations collectively managed by
Agriliance to Land OLakes, resulting in a gain of
$7.4 million. This left the Company with a 25% economic
interest in such operations. In July 2000, Agriliance secured
its own financing, which is without recourse to the Company.
Agriliance also purchased the net working capital related to
agronomy operations from each of its member owners, consisting
primarily of trade accounts receivable and inventories, net of
accounts payable. On July 31, 2000, the Company contributed
outright its ownership interest in the Cenex/ Land OLakes
Agronomy Company and in Agro Distribution, LLC, with a total
investment of $64.7 million, along with the rest of its
wholesale agronomy business, to Agriliance. The Company retained
a 25% interest in Agriliance after the outright contribution of
its ownership interests in those two ventures and its wholesale
agronomy business. Agriliance ownership also includes Farmland
(25%) and Land OLakes (50%). The interests of the Company
and Farmland are held through equal ownership in United Country
Brands, LLC, a joint venture holding company whose sole
operations consist of the ownership of a 50% interest in
Agriliance. The Companys equity in the joint venture was
recorded at the historical carrying value of its ownership in
Cenex/ Land OLakes Agronomy Company and Agro Distribution,
LLC and no gain or loss was recorded on the exchange.
In April 2003, the Company acquired an additional
economic interest in the Agriliance wholesale crop protection
business (the CPP Business), which constitutes only
a part of the Agriliance business operations. The Company
acquired 13.1% of the CPP Business for a cash payment of
$34.3 million. The economic interests in Agriliance are
owned 50% by Land OLakes, 25% plus an additional 13.1% of
the CPP Business by the Company and 25% less 13.1% of the CPP
Business by Farmland. The ownership or governance interests in
Agriliance did not change. Agriliances earnings or losses
are split among the members based upon the respective economic
interest of each member.
F-12
The following provides summarized financial
information for Agriliance balance sheets as of August 31,
2003 and 2002, and statements of operations for the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
Disclosure of the fair value of financial
instruments to which the Company is a party includes estimates
and assumptions which may be subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore
cannot be determined with precision. Financial instruments are
carried at amounts that approximate estimated fair values.
Investments in cooperatives and joint ventures have no quoted
market prices.
Various agreements with other owners of investee
companies and a majority-owned subsidiary set out parameters
whereby CHS may buy and sell additional interests in those
companies, upon the occurrence of certain events, at fair values
determinable as set forth in the specific agreements.
5. Property,
Plant and Equipment:
A summary of property, plant and equipment as of
August 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
In January 2002, the Company formed a limited
liability company with Cargill, Incorporated to engage in wheat
flour milling and processing. The Company holds a 24% interest
in the entity, which is known as Horizon Milling, LLC. The
Company is leasing certain of its wheat milling facilities and
related equipment to Horizon Milling under an operating lease
agreement. The book value of the leased milling assets at
August 31, 2003, was $99.4 million, net of accumulated
depreciation of $31.3 million.
For the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, the Company capitalized interest of $3.9 million,
$2.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, related
to capitalized construction projects.
F-13
6. Other
Assets:
Other assets as of August 31, 2003 and 2002
are as follows:
Intangible assets subject to amortization are
provided on a straight-line basis over the number of years that
approximate their respective useful lives (ranging from 2 to
15 years). The straight-line method of amortization
reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of intangible
assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic
benefit obtained by the Company in each reporting period.
Amortization expenses for the years ended August 31, 2003
and 2002, were $12.2 million and $4.2 million,
respectively. The estimated amortization expense related to
intangible assets subject to amortization for the next five
years will approximate $2.7 million annually.
Through Country Energy, LLC, formerly a joint
venture with Farmland, the Company marketed refined petroleum
products including gasoline, diesel fuel, propane and lubricants
under the Cenex brand. On November 30, 2001, the Company
purchased the wholesale energy business of Farmland, as well as
all interest in Country Energy, LLC. Based on estimated fair
values, $26.4 million of the purchase price was allocated
to intangible assets, primarily trademarks, tradenames and
non-compete agreements. The intangible assets had a
weighted-average life of approximately 12 years. During the
year ended August 31, 2003, the Company accelerated the
amortization of the non-compete agreement due to Farmlands
July 31, 2003 notification that it intends to liquidate its
assets in bankruptcy. The Company had additional amortization
expense of $7.5 million during 2003 related to the
acceleration, and the asset has a zero book value as of
August 31, 2003. The Company also entered into an exclusive
two-year supply agreement to purchase, at prevailing market
prices, all of the refined fuels production from Farmlands
Coffeyville, Kansas facility. On May 22, 2003, the Company
gave notice to Farmland that it will not renew the supply
agreement, and the non-renewal is effective November 30,
2003. The Companys management is confident that
alternative sources of supply will be available and that the
non-renewal will not have a material affect on the Company.
F-14
7. Notes Payable
and Long-Term Debt:
Notes payable and long-term debt as of
August 31, 2003 and 2002 consisted of the following:
F-15
The fair value of long-term debt approximates
book value as of August 31, 2003 and 2002.
The aggregate amount of long-term debt payable as
of August 31, 2003 is as follows:
The Company is in compliance with all debt
covenants and restrictions as of August 31, 2003.
8. Income
Taxes:
As a result of the Companys by-law changes
during 2001, and the by-law changes of its majority-owned
subsidiary (NCRA) in 2002, to distribute patronage based on
financial statement earnings, the statutory rate applied to the
cumulative differences between financial statement earnings and
tax basis earnings, has been changed. In connection with this
change the Company recorded a deferred tax benefit of
$10.9 million as of August 31, 2002, and
$34.2 million as of August 31, 2001. The
$10.9 million deferred tax benefit recorded as a result of
the change in patronage distribution by NCRA as of
August 31, 2002, has been offset by a $10.9 million
NCRA valuation allowance. Additional valuation allowances of
$1.7 million, $6.2 million and $2.4 million were
provided to offset deferred tax benefits generated by NCRA as of
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The provision for income taxes for the years
ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
F-16
The tax effect of temporary differences of
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of August 31, 2003
and 2002 is as follows:
As of August 31, 2003, net deferred tax
assets of $22.0 million and $28.7 million are included
in current assets and other assets, respectively
($19.0 million and $50.6 million, respectively, as of
August 31, 2002). At August 31, 2003, NCRA recognized
a valuation allowance for the entire tax benefit associated with
its net deferred tax asset, as it is considered more likely than
not, based on the weight of available information, that the
future tax benefits related to these items will not be realized.
At August 31, 2003, NCRAs net deferred tax assets of
$11.8 million were comprised of deferred tax assets of
$21.4 million and deferred tax liabilities of
$9.6 million. Deferred tax assets are comprised of basis
differences related to inventories, investments, lease
obligations, accrued liabilities and certain federal and state
tax credits. NCRA files a separate tax return and, as such,
these items must be assessed independently of the Companys
deferred tax assets when determining recoverability.
The reconciliation of the statutory federal
income tax rates to the effective tax rates for the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
F-17
The principal differences between financial
statement income and taxable (loss) income for the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
No tax benefit has been recognized for
NCRAs $13.1 million operating loss that was included in
the Companys August 31, 2003 taxable loss as shown
above.
9. Equities:
In accordance with the by-laws and by action of
the Board of Directors, annual net savings from patronage
sources are distributed to consenting patrons following the
close of each year, and are based on amounts using financial
statement earnings. The cash portion of the patronage
distribution is determined annually by the Board of Directors,
with the balance issued in the form of capital equity
certificates.
Annual net savings from sources other than
patronage may be added to the unallocated capital reserve or,
upon action by the Board of Directors, allocated to members in
the form of nonpatronage equity certificates. Redemptions are at
the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Inactive direct members and patrons and active
direct members and patrons age 61 and older on June 1,
1998, are eligible for redemption of their capital equity
certificates at age 72 or death. For other active direct
members and patrons and member cooperatives, equities will be
redeemed annually as determined by the Board of Directors.
On May 31, 1997, the Company completed an
offering for the sale of Equity Participation Units (EPUs) in
its Wheat Milling Defined Business Unit and its Oilseed
Processing and Refining Defined Business Unit to qualified
subscribers. Qualified subscribers were identified as Defined
Members or representatives of Defined Members who were persons
or associations of producers actually engaged in the production
of agricultural products. Subscribers were allowed to purchase a
portion of their EPUs by exchanging existing patronage
certificates. The purchasers of EPUs had the right and
obligation to deliver annually the number of bushels of wheat or
soybeans equal to the number of units held. Unit holders
participated in the net patronage-sourced income from operations
of the applicable Defined Business Unit as patronage refunds.
Retirements of patrons equities attributable to EPUs, were
at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and it was the
Boards goal to retire such equity on a revolving basis
seven years after declaration.
F-18
During 2001, the Companys Board of
Directors adopted a resolution to issue, at no charge, to each
Defined Member of the Oilseed Processing and Refining Defined
Business Unit an additional 1/4 EPU, for each EPU held, due
to increased crush volume.
In August 2001, the CHS Board of Directors
approved and consummated a plan to end the Defined Investment
Program. The Company redeemed all of the EPUs and allocated the
assets of the Oilseed Processing and Refining and Wheat Milling
Defined Business Units to the Company as provided in the plan.
The amounts redeemed to the Oilseed Processing and Refining and
Wheat Milling Defined Member EPU holders were $5.2 million
and $9.1 million, respectively. Due to loss carry-forwards
incurred by the Wheat Milling Defined Business Unit, the plan
also provided for the cancellation of all outstanding Preferred
Capital Certificates issued to the Wheat Milling EPU holders,
totaling $0.2 million. The plan further provided to the
Oilseed Processing and Refining Defined Member EPU holders for
the redemption of all outstanding Preferred Capital Certificates
issued of $0.2 million and a 100% cash distribution during
2002 for the patronage refunds earned for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2001.
In January 2003, the Board of Directors
authorized the sale and issuance of up to 3,500,000 shares of 8%
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (New Preferred) at a price
of $25.00 per share. The Company filed a registration statement
on Form S-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
registering 3,000,000 shares of the New Preferred (with an
additional over-allotment option of 450,000 shares granted to
the underwriters), which was declared effective on
January 27, 2003. The shares were subsequently sold for
proceeds of $86.3 million (3,450,000 shares), and are listed on
the NASDAQ National Market. Expenses related to the issuance of
the New Preferred were $3.8 million.
The Company had previously suspended sales of its
8% Preferred Stock (Old Preferred) after raising
$9.5 million (9,454,874 shares), and on February 25,
2003, the Company filed a post-effective amendment to terminate
the offering of the Old Preferred shares. On March 5, 2003,
the Companys Board of Directors authorized the redemption
and conversion of the Old Preferred shares. A redemption
notification and a conversion election form were sent to holders
of the Old Preferred shares on March 21, 2003 explaining
that on April 25, 2003 all shares of the Old Preferred
would be redeemed by the Company for $1.00 per share unless
they were converted into shares of the Companys New
Preferred. The conversion did not change the base liquidation
amount or dividend amount of the Old Preferred, since 25 shares
of the Old Preferred converted to 1 share of the New
Preferred. The total Old Preferred converted to the New
Preferred was $7.5 million (7,452,439 shares) and the
balance of the Old Preferred (2,002,435 shares) was redeemed in
cash at $1.00 per share. As of August 31, 2003, the
Company had $93.7 million (3,748,099 shares) of the New
Preferred outstanding.
F-19
The Company has various pension and other defined
benefit and defined contribution plans, in which substantially
all employees may participate.
Financial information on changes in benefit
obligation and plan assets funded and balance sheet status as of
August 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
F-20
For measurement purposes, a 9% annual rate of
increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits
was assumed for the year ended August 31, 2003. The rate
was assumed to decrease gradually to 6.0% for 2006 and remain at
that level thereafter. Components of net periodic benefit costs
for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are as
follows:
F-21
The aggregate projected benefit obligation,
accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for
pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of
plan assets were as follows as of August 31, 2003 and 2002:
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a
significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care
plans. A one-percentage point change in the assumed health care
cost trend rates would have the following effects:
The Company provides defined life insurance and
health care benefits for certain retired employees. The plan is
contributory based on years of service and family status, with
retiree contributions adjusted annually.
The Company has other contributory defined
contribution plans covering substantially all employees. Total
contributions by the Company to these plans were
$8.5 million, $11.0 million and $6.1 million, for
the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
The Company manages five business segments, which
are based on products and services, and are Agronomy, Energy,
Country Operations and Services, Grain Marketing, and Processed
Grains and Foods. The Agronomy segment consists of joint
ventures and other investments, from which the Company derives
investment income based upon the profitability of these
investments. The Energy segment derives its revenues through
refining, wholesaling and retailing of petroleum products. The
Country Operations and Services segment derives its revenues
through the origination and marketing of grain, through the
retail sales of petroleum and agronomy products, and processed
sunflowers, feed and farm supplies. The Country Operations
segment also derives revenues from service activities related to
crop production. The Grain Marketing segment derives its
revenues from the sale of grains and oilseeds and from service
activities conducted at its export terminals. Processed Grains
and Foods segment derives its revenues from the sales of soybean
meal and soybean refined oil, from equity income in two wheat
milling joint ventures, from equity income in an oilseed food
manufacturing joint venture, and from the sale of Mexican food
products.
Reconciling Amounts represent the elimination of
sales between segments. Such transactions are conducted at
market prices to more accurately evaluate the profitability of
the individual business segments.
The Company assigns certain corporate general and
administrative expenses to its business segments based on use of
such services and allocates other services based on factors or
considerations relevant to the costs incurred.
Expenses that are incurred at the corporate level
for the purpose of the general operation of the Company are
allocated to the segments based upon factors which management
considers to be non-
F-22
asymmetrical. Nevertheless, due to efficiencies
in scale, cost allocations, and intersegment activity,
management does not represent that these segments, if operated
independently, would report the income before income taxes and
other financial information as presented.
Segment information for the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
F-23
F-24
12. Commitments and
Contingencies:
The Company is required to comply with various
environmental laws and regulations incidental to its normal
business operations. In order to meet its compliance
requirements, the Company establishes reserves for the probable
future costs of remediation of identified issues, which are
included in cost of goods sold and marketing, general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations. The resolution of any such matters may affect
consolidated net income for any fiscal period; however,
management believes any resulting liabilities, individually or
in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company during any fiscal year.
In connection with certain refinery upgrades and
enhancements that are necessary in order to comply with existing
environmental regulations, the Company expects to incur
additional capital expenditures of approximately
$87.0 million for the Companys Laurel, Montana
refinery and $324.0 million for NCRAs McPherson,
Kansas refinery, of which $8.7 million has been spent at
the Laurel refinery and $36.5 million has been spent by
NCRA at the McPherson refinery as of August 31, 2003. The
Company expects all of these compliance capital expenditures at
the refineries to be complete by December 31, 2005, and
anticipates funding these projects with a combination of cash
flows from operations and debt proceeds.
The Company is involved as a defendant in various
lawsuits, claims and disputes which are in the normal course of
the Companys business. The resolution of any such matters
may affect consolidated net income for any fiscal period;
however, management believes any resulting liabilities,
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material
effect on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company during any fiscal year.
As of August 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company
stored grain and processed grain products for third parties
totaling $155.2 million and $148.0 million,
respectively. Such stored commodities and products are not the
property of the Company and therefore are not included in the
Companys inventories.
The Company is a guarantor for lines of credit
for related companies of which $52.3 million was
outstanding as of August 31, 2003. The Companys bank
covenants allow maximum guarantees of $150.0 million. In
addition, the Companys bank covenants allow for guarantees
dedicated solely for NCRA in the amount of $125.0 million.
All outstanding loans with respective creditors are current as
of August 31, 2003.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. The initial
recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation
are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the
guarantors fiscal year-end. The disclosure requirements
are effective for financial statements of interim or annual
periods ending after December 15, 2002. The interpretation
addresses the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its
interim and annual financial statements about its obligations
under guarantees. The interpretation also clarifies the
requirements related to the recognition of a liability by a
guarantor at the inception of the guarantee for obligations the
guarantor has undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
The Company makes seasonal and term loans to
member cooperatives, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Fin-Ag,
Inc., makes loans for agricultural purposes to individual
producers. Some of these loans are sold to CoBank, and the
Company guarantees a portion of the loans sold. In addition, the
Company also guarantees certain debt and obligations under
contracts for its subsidiaries and members.
F-25
The Companys obligations pursuant to its
guarantees as of August 31, 2003 are as follows:
F-26
The Company leases approximately 1,900 rail cars
with remaining lease terms of one to ten years. In addition, the
Company has commitments under other operating leases for various
refinery, manufacturing and transportation equipment, vehicles
and office space. Some leases include purchase options at not
less than fair market value at the end of the leases.
Total rental expense for all operating leases,
net of rail car mileage credits received from the railroad and
sublease income was $31.7 million, $30.7 million and
$35.5 million for the years ended August 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively. Mileage credits and sublease income
were $7.1 million, $9.5 million and $11.0 million for
the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
Minimum future lease payments, required under
noncancellable operating leases as of August 31, 2003 are
as follows:
13. Supplemental
Cash Flow and Other Information:
Additional information concerning supplemental
disclosures of cash flow activities for the years ended
August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
F-27
14. Related Party
Transactions:
Related party transactions with equity investees
as of August 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
These related party transactions were primarily
with Agriliance, CF Industries, Inc., Horizon Milling, TEMCO,
LLC and Ventura Foods, LLC.
15. Comprehensive
Income:
The components of comprehensive income, net of
taxes, for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
are as follows:
The components of accumulated other comprehensive
loss, net of taxes, as of August 31, 2003 and 2002 are as
follows:
F-28
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies:
Organization:
Consolidation:
Cash Equivalents:
Inventories:
Table of Contents
Derivative Financial
Instruments:
Commodity Price Risk
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Risk
Foreign Currency Risk
Investments:
Property, Plant and
Equipment:
Table of Contents
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets:
Revenue Recognition:
Environmental Expenditures:
Income Taxes:
Table of Contents
Comprehensive Income:
Use of Estimates:
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements:
Table of Contents
Reclassifications:
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
748,398
$
717,888
47,000
49,846
795,398
767,734
31,618
26,156
$
763,780
$
741,578
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in millions)
$
99
$
135
$
138
815
407
403
156
282
255
367
298
317
166
100
101
$
1,603
$
1,222
$
1,214
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
370,381
$
393,095
292,095
229,981
95,589
91,138
42,688
36,264
1,130
9,185
$
801,883
$
759,663
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
152,996
$
152,996
22,505
30,069
24,481
25,797
27,105
26,232
107,464
108,981
129,286
86,175
9,087
8,414
59,969
57,943
$
532,893
$
496,607
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
193,632
$
171,084
231,649
231,045
227,400
133,230
21,738
90,819
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
1,165,823
$
1,013,475
$
925,962
155,274
181,217
161,405
42,837
75,368
71,148
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
1,249,941
$
922,958
119,615
134,247
1,083,743
700,903
27,061
107,960
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
3,485,623
$
3,625,849
$
4,072,248
67,239
57,604
50,423
60,741
47,044
25,053
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
60,453
$
63,045
380,940
371,107
1,508,963
1,470,475
68,369
62,144
159,555
71,540
2,178,280
2,038,311
1,055,298
980,890
$
1,122,982
$
1,057,421
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
27,052
$
27,926
9,414
8,447
1,766
11,204
14,607
15,795
151,389
54,230
28,689
50,544
1,991
4,822
4,612
4,354
$
239,520
$
177,322
Table of Contents
Interest rates at August 31,
2003
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
1.63% to 1.96%
$
251,131
$
332,514
2.14% to 13.00%
$
168,032
$
254,962
6.81%
225,000
225,000
4.96% to 5.60%
175,000
7.43% to 7.90%
80,000
80,000
5.23% to 12.97%
5,831
7,444
5.70% to 12.17%
9,310
4,718
663,173
572,124
14,951
89,032
$
648,222
$
483,092
2003
2002
1.83%
2.58%
6.52%
6.38%
(a)
The Company finances its working capital needs
through short-term lines of credit with a syndication of banks.
The Company has a 364-day credit facility of
$600.0 million, all of which is committed, and of which
$250.0 million was outstanding on August 31, 2003. In
addition to this short-term line of credit, the Company has a
364-day credit facility dedicated to NCRA with a syndication of
banks in the amount of $30.0 million, all of which is
committed, with no amounts outstanding on August 31, 2003.
Other miscellaneous notes payable totaled $1.1 million at
August 31, 2003.
(b)
The Company established a $100.0 million
three-year revolving credit facility with a syndication of
banks. On August 31, 2003, the Company had no outstanding
balance on this facility.
(c)
The Company established a long-term credit
agreement which committed $200.0 million of long-term
borrowing capacity to the Company through May 31, 1999, of which
$164.0 million was drawn before the expiration date of that
commitment. On August 31, 2003, $137.8 million was
outstanding. NCRA term loans of $15.0 million are
collateralized by NCRAs investment in CoBank.
(d)
The Company entered into a private placement with
several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of
$225.0 million.
(e)
In October 2002, the Company entered into a
private placement with several insurance companies for long-term
debt in the amount of $175.0 million.
Table of Contents
(f)
In January 2001, the Company entered into a note
purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Insurance
Company. A long-term note was issued for $25.0 million and
a subsequent note for $55.0 million was issued in March
2001.
(g)
Industrial Revenue Bonds in the amount of
$1.6 million are collateralized by property, plant and
equipment, primarily energy refinery equipment, with a cost of
approximately $152.0 million, less accumulated depreciation
of approximately $120.4 million as of August 31, 2003.
(h)
Grain Suppliers, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company, has other notes payable of $5.4 million
collateralized by property, plant and equipment, with a cost of
approximately $8.3 million, less accumulated depreciation of
approximately $0.2 million on August 31, 2003.
(i)
The debt is unsecured, however restrictive
covenants under various agreements have requirements for
maintenance of minimum working capital levels and other
financial ratios.
(dollars in thousands)
$
14,951
34,716
35,176
59,671
98,190
420,469
$
663,173
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
3,700
$
14,300
$
21,025
7,300
(12,700
)
(49,025
)
1,700
17,100
2,400
$
12,700
$
18,700
$
(25,600
)
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
53,521
$
49,236
29,153
32,671
9,369
11,532
8,948
6,993
19,316
12,439
120,307
112,871
34,531
2,635
23,310
20,482
730
57,841
23,847
(11,765
)
(19,466
)
$
50,701
$
69,558
2003
2002
2001
35.0
%
35.0
%
35.0
%
3.9
3.9
3.9
(25.7
)
(25.0
)
(32.8
)
(7.5
)
(22.4
)
(3.2
)
(1.9
)
1.3
11.8
1.6
(2.0
)
(3.4
)
(2.0
)
9.3
%
12.9
%
(16.7
)%
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
136,541
$
144,838
$
152,954
2,208
1,939
4,453
(21,989
)
1,540
(22,230
)
1,210
(933
)
(2,441
)
(21,966
)
(21,491
)
8,981
117
1,898
26,495
(11,253
)
(7,141
)
1,716
(2,291
)
10,038
(90,000
)
(92,900
)
(128,900
)
$
(3,416
)
$
25,459
$
49,350
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
10.
Employee Benefit Plans:
Qualified
Non-Qualified
Pension Benefits
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2003
2002
2003
2002
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
253,868
$
241,728
$
14,543
$
11,836
$
24,915
$
22,667
10,840
9,275
800
1,168
648
557
17,503
17,673
1,033
886
1,722
1,586
1,771
215
189
2,383
88
3,677
22,049
1,157
(766
)
1,607
2,527
1,716
4,659
1,469
638
(20,784
)
(22,025
)
(1,776
)
(954
)
(2,329
)
(2,438
)
$
289,906
$
253,868
$
13,834
$
14,543
$
29,255
$
24,915
$
201,563
$
230,121
14,915
(14,810
)
84,523
4,600
$
1,776
$
954
$
2,114
$
2,249
215
189
3,677
(20,784
)
(22,025
)
(1,776
)
(954
)
(2,329
)
(2,438
)
$
280,217
$
201,563
$
$
$
$
$
(9,689
)
$
(52,305
)
$
(13,834
)
$
(14,543
)
$
(29,255
)
$
(24,915
)
31,362
84
32
247
269
118,025
85,066
(899
)
16
707
(3,505
)
9,261
10,197
7,467
6,502
3,503
4,067
(1,076
)
(1,336
)
$
115,803
$
70,625
$
(11,146
)
$
(10,428
)
$
(20,116
)
$
(19,290
)
Table of Contents
Qualified
Non-Qualified
Pension Benefits
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2003
2002
2003
2002
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
95,917
$
(11,028
)
$
(12,125
)
$
(12,809
)
$
(20,116
)
$
(19,290
)
2,425
6,510
253
1,485
6,195
17,461
68,948
726
896
$
115,803
$
70,625
$
(11,146
)
$
(10,428
)
$
(20,116
)
$
(19,290
)
Qualified
Non-Qualified
Pension Benefits
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
$
10,840
$
9,275
$
7,875
$
800
$
1,168
$
631
$
648
$
557
$
566
17,503
17,673
17,580
1,033
886
907
1,722
1,586
1,569
(23,788
)
(21,386
)
(22,855
)
806
740
619
564
574
574
(172
)
(197
)
(131
)
2,623
1,369
231
159
18
144
(215
)
(505
)
(538
)
(708
)
(874
)
13
936
936
936
(22
)
$
7,984
$
6,963
$
2,576
$
2,556
$
2,646
$
2,269
$
2,919
$
2,377
$
2,380
6.30
%
7.10
%
7.30
%
6.00
%
7.25
%
7.50
%
6.30
%
7.10
%
7.30
%
9.00
%
9.00
%
9.00
%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
Table of Contents
Qualified
Non-Qualified
Pension Benefits
Pension Benefits
2003
2002
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
120,068
$
253,868
$
13,834
$
14,543
107,760
243,953
12,209
12,842
104,560
201,563
1% Increase
1% Decrease
(dollars in thousands)
$
275
$
(250
)
2,618
(2,399
)
11.
Segment Reporting:
Table of Contents
Country
Operations
Processed
and
Grain
Grains and
Corporate
Reconciling
Agronomy
Energy
Services
Marketing
Foods
and Other
Amounts
Total
(dollars in thousands)
For the year ended August 31,
2003:
$
3,648,093
$
1,885,825
$
4,139,226
$
491,931
$
(894,341
)
$
9,270,734
$
(84
)
415
2,467
218
111
$
130
3,257
10,461
81,739
25,458
2,300
4,584
124,542
(84
)
3,658,969
1,970,031
4,164,902
494,342
4,714
(894,341
)
9,398,533
3,475,947
1,876,811
4,133,677
466,857
(894,341
)
9,058,951
8,138
63,740
55,887
21,072
36,540
5,205
190,582
(10,867
)
(10,867
)
(974
)
16,401
14,975
4,738
12,845
690
48,675
(20,773
)
(1,353
)
(788
)
1,673
(26,056
)
(2
)
(47,299
)
20,782
1,168
21,950
$
13,525
$
83,452
$
32,845
$
3,742
$
4,156
$
(1,179
)
$
$
136,541
$
(94,209
)
$
(796,999
)
$
(2,435
)
$
(698
)
$
894,341
$
$
3,185
$
262
$
23,605
$
27,052
$
80,837
$
26,738
$
5,298
$
60,576
$
2,240
$
175,689
$
1,247
$
65,868
$
21,039
$
6,718
$
13,321
$
3,154
$
111,347
$
285,906
$
1,449,652
$
857,523
$
450,415
$
498,872
$
265,600
$
3,807,968
Table of Contents
Country
Operations
Processed
and
Grain
Grains and
Corporate
Reconciling
Agronomy
Energy
Services
Marketing
Foods
and Other
Amounts
Total
(dollars in thousands)
For the year ended August 31,
2002:
$
2,657,689
$
1,474,553
$
3,281,469
$
496,084
$
(753,341
)
$
7,156,454
$
(89
)
458
2,572
497
260
$
187
3,885
6,392
80,789
21,902
(1,469
)
1,845
109,459
(89
)
2,664,539
1,557,914
3,303,868
494,875
2,032
(753,341
)
7,269,798
2,489,352
1,474,392
3,272,985
457,538
(753,341
)
6,940,926
8,957
66,731
47,995
22,213
36,930
4,466
187,292
(2,970
)
(2,970
)
(1,403
)
16,875
13,851
4,807
9,514
(1,189
)
42,455
(13,425
)
1,166
(283
)
(4,257
)
(41,331
)
(3
)
(58,133
)
14,604
786
15,390
$
5,782
$
75,811
$
24,143
$
8,120
$
32,224
$
(1,242
)
$
$
144,838
$
(67,367
)
$
(615,853
)
$
(69,561
)
$
(560
)
$
753,341
$
$
4,059
$
262
$
23,605
$
27,926
$
54,576
$
34,305
$
14,851
$
35,144
$
1,293
$
140,169
$
1,247
$
58,701
$
21,214
$
6,235
$
13,436
$
3,153
$
103,986
$
242,015
$
1,305,828
$
799,711
$
481,232
$
439,942
$
212,999
$
3,481,727
For the year ended August 31,
2001:
$
2,781,243
$
1,577,268
$
3,416,239
$
662,726
$
(973,234
)
$
7,464,242
$
196
712
3,683
840
339
$
207
5,977
4,036
80,479
22,964
(238
)
9,013
116,254
196
2,785,991
1,661,430
3,440,043
662,827
9,220
(973,234
)
7,586,473
2,549,099
1,569,884
3,416,500
619,184
(973,234
)
7,181,433
8,503
48,432
53,417
22,396
44,870
6,428
184,046
(4,529
)
25,097
15,695
8,144
13,026
4,003
61,436
(7,360
)
4,081
(246
)
(4,519
)
(35,505
)
15,055
(28,494
)
34,713
385
35,098
$
3,582
$
124,569
$
22,295
$
(2,478
)
$
21,252
$
(16,266
)
$
$
152,954
$
(71,846
)
$
(709,910
)
$
(190,695
)
$
(783
)
$
973,234
$
$
38,984
$
32,448
$
3,715
$
20,485
$
1,978
$
97,610
$
1,250
$
55,343
$
21,738
$
4,917
$
22,304
$
3,628
$
109,180
Table of Contents
Environmental:
Other Litigation and Claims:
Grain Storage:
Guarantees:
Table of Contents
Guarantee/
Exposure on
Maximum
August 31,
Nature of
Triggering
Recourse
Assets Held
Entities
Exposure
2003
Guarantee
Expiration Date
Event
Provisions
as Collateral
(dollars in thousands)
*
$
6,667
10% of the obligations of borrowers (agri-
cultural cooperatives) under credit agreements for loans sold
None stated, but may be terminated by either
party upon 60 days prior notice in regard to future
obligations
Credit agreement default
Subrogation against borrower
Some or all assets of borrower are held as
collateral and should be sufficient to cover guarantee exposure
*
43,016
15% of the obligations of borrowers under credit
agreements for some of the loans sold, and 100% of the
obligations of borrowers for the remaining loans sold
None stated, but may be terminated by either
party upon 90 days prior notice in regard to future
obligations
Credit agreement default
Subrogation against borrower
Some or all assets of borrower are held as
collateral and should be sufficient to cover guarantee exposure
$
7,500
Obligations by TEMCO, LLC under credit agreement
None stated
Credit agreement default
Subrogation against TEMCO, LLC
None
$
194
179
Obligations by North Valley Petroleum, LLC under
credit agreement
None stated
Credit agreement default
Subrogation against North Valley Petroleum, LLC
None
*
2,413
Surety for, or indemnification of surety for
sales contracts between affiliates and sellers of grain under
deferred payment contracts
Annual renewal on December 1st in regard to
surety for one third party, otherwise none stated and may be
terminated by the Company at any time in regard to future
obligations
Nonpayment
Subrogation against affiliates
Some or all assets of borrower are held as
collateral but might not be sufficient to cover guarantee
exposure
$
52,275
*
The Companys bank covenants allow for
guarantees of up to $150.0 million, but the Company is under no
obligation to extend these guarantees. The maximum exposure on
any given date is equal to the actual guarantees extended as of
that date.
Table of Contents
Lease Commitments:
Rail
Equipment
Cars
Vehicles
and Other
Total
(dollars in thousands)
$
9,407
$
12,141
$
11,856
$
33,404
7,447
10,158
6,842
24,447
5,027
9,273
4,881
19,181
4,073
4,825
3,668
12,566
2,914
2,240
2,061
7,215
4,246
1,643
4,693
10,582
$
33,114
$
40,280
$
34,001
$
107,395
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
45,239
$
44,231
$
63,034
956
27,965
11,709
(54,399
)
350
1,842
5,481
1,045
7,452
(39,049
)
(56,510
)
(72,154
)
33,583
(49,982
)
512
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
779,857
$
549,978
637,357
502,450
13,393
21,232
29,113
18,296
2003
2002
2001
(dollars in thousands)
$
123,841
$
126,138
$
178,554
36,105
(48,797
)
(15
)
1,045
(548
)
527
(3,548
)
(637
)
(18
)
$
157,425
$
76,156
$
179,066
2003
2002
(dollars in thousands)
$
13,946
$
50,051
164
1,209
4,185
637
18
$
18,313
$
51,897
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Members and Patrons
of
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of
operations, of equities and comprehensive income and of cash
flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of CHS Inc. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2003
and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
August 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management; our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
November 5, 2003
F-29
Table of Contents
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
Members Committee
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Ventura Foods, LLC and subsidiary (the
Company) as of March 31, 2003 and 2002 and the
related consolidated statements of income, members capital
and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002,
the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Ventura Foods, LLC and subsidiary as of
March 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2003 and
2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year
ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,
effective April 1, 2002.
Los Angeles, California
F-30
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Table of Contents
VENTURA FOODS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
2003
2002
ASSETS (Note 4)
$
2,800,000
$
9,300,000
64,313,000
57,139,000
92,366,000
62,799,000
5,922,000
2,283,000
309,000
18,703,000
13,298,000
184,413,000
144,819,000
102,768,000
98,840,000
139,264,000
129,133,000
6,905,000
6,489,000
10,798,000
10,494,000
259,735,000
244,956,000
106,914,000
95,052,000
152,821,000
149,904,000
43,156,000
43,156,000
19,318,000
19,577,000
13,574,000
14,240,000
4,673,000
5,293,000
$
417,955,000
$
376,989,000
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS
CAPITAL
$
58,395,000
$
52,045,000
36,984,000
25,784,000
5,748,000
9,550,000
20,500,000
8,000,000
74,228,000
12,758,000
491,000
12,162,000
4,120,000
208,017,000
112,748,000
22,950,000
97,178,000
20,496,000
16,347,000
251,463,000
226,273,000
166,492,000
150,716,000
$
417,955,000
$
376,989,000
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-31
VENTURA FOODS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months
Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
Ended
December 31,
March 31, 2003
March 31, 2002
March 31, 2001
2000
$
1,096,425,000
$
965,521,000
$
215,158,000
$
889,775,000
912,702,000
791,061,000
177,492,000
743,291,000
183,723,000
174,460,000
37,666,000
146,484,000
105,424,000
91,827,000
20,092,000
77,878,000
223,000
6,227,000
1,581,000
6,431,000
105,647,000
98,054,000
21,673,000
84,309,000
78,076,000
76,406,000
15,993,000
62,175,000
6,785,000
7,474,000
2,071,000
9,585,000
733,000
(1,554,000
)
(446,000
)
(4,916,000
)
$
70,558,000
$
70,486,000
$
14,368,000
$
57,506,000
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-32
VENTURA FOODS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS
CAPITAL
Cenex Harvest
Wilsey
States
Foods, Inc.
Cooperatives
Total
$
67,315,000
$
44,877,000
$
112,192,000
30,593,000
26,913,000
57,506,000
(11,775,000
)
11,775,000
(23,288,000
)
(20,720,000
)
(44,008,000
)
62,845,000
62,845,000
125,690,000
7,184,000
7,184,000
14,368,000
(4,157,000
)
(4,157,000
)
(8,314,000
)
65,872,000
65,872,000
131,744,000
35,243,000
35,243,000
70,486,000
(25,757,000
)
(25,757,000
)
(51,514,000
)
75,358,000
75,358,000
150,716,000
35,279,000
35,279,000
70,558,000
(27,391,000
)
(27,391,000
)
(54,782,000
)
$
83,246,000
$
83,246,000
$
166,492,000
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-33
VENTURA FOODS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
Three Months
Year Ended
Year Ended
Ended
Year Ended
March 31,
March 31,
March 31,
December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
$
70,558,000
$
70,486,000
$
14,368,000
$
57,506,000
12,416,000
12,186,000
2,833,000
10,829,000
223,000
6,227,000
1,581,000
6,431,000
515,000
872,000
324,000
128,000
(139,000
)
2,637,000
(1,803,000
)
(7,375,000
)
(7,174,000
)
(771,000
)
980,000
(359,000
)
(29,567,000
)
3,881,000
5,089,000
(3,246,000
)
(3,639,000
)
(793,000
)
330,000
234,000
6,350,000
(4,491,000
)
(2,943,000
)
(4,654,000
)
10,685,000
2,893,000
(2,540,000
)
2,499,000
4,815,000
4,866,000
(1,767,000
)
6,747,000
(309,000
)
47,000
1,000
293,000
68,382,000
93,052,000
10,685,000
76,141,000
(16,062,000
)
(13,268,000
)
(4,869,000
)
(13,037,000
)
1,845,000
69,000
23,000
1,021,000
(5,312,000
)
(47,000
)
(13,976,000
)
(1,332,000
)
(48,000
)
67,000
(201,000
)
(15,549,000
)
(27,223,000
)
(4,779,000
)
(17,576,000
)
(12,758,000
)
(12,603,000
)
(554,000
)
(12,417,000
)
12,500,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
(15,000,000
)
(491,000
)
(487,000
)
(487,000
)
(58,584,000
)
(60,589,000
)
(38,539,000
)
(59,333,000
)
(70,679,000
)
3,959,000
(65,956,000
)
(6,500,000
)
(4,850,000
)
9,865,000
(7,391,000
)
9,300,000
14,150,000
4,285,000
11,676,000
$
2,800,000
$
9,300,000
$
14,150,000
$
4,285,000
INFORMATION Cash paid during the
period for interest
$
7,183,000
$
8,129,000
$
653,054
$
10,181,000
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-34
VENTURA FOODS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | General Matters |
Ventura Foods, LLC and its subsidiary (the Company) is a processor and distributor of edible oils used in food preparation and a packager of food products. The Company sells its products to national and regional restaurant chains, food wholesalers and retail chains.
The Company was formed pursuant to a Joint Venture Agreement (the Agreement) dated August 30, 1996 between Wilsey Foods, Inc. (Wilsey) and Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives (CHS) whereby substantially all the assets and liabilities of Wilsey and Holsum Foods (a division of CHS) were transferred and assigned, with certain exclusions, to the Company. Wilsey is a majority-owned subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. From the period of inception through March 31, 2000, Wilsey and CHS owned 60% and 40%, respectively, of the Company. On March 31, 2000, Wilsey sold a 10% interest in the Company to CHS. Accordingly, Wilsey and CHS each own 50% of the Company.
At the formation date, a liability equal to the net deferred income tax liability of Wilsey at August 30, 1996 was assumed by the Company and was included in long-term liability Wilsey Foods, Inc. The amount was payable in five equal annual installments of $487,000 plus a final installment of $491,000. The final installment of $491,000 was paid during fiscal 2003.
2. | Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ventura Foods, LLC and its 100%-owned subsidiary, Ventura Jets, Inc. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Fiscal Year End During 2001, the Company changed its fiscal year end to March 31. Prior to such change, the Companys fiscal year end had been December 31.
Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following at March 31:
2003
2002
$
38,751,000
$
17,654,000
34,119,000
27,696,000
19,496,000
17,449,000
$
92,366,000
$
62,799,000
Inventories are accounted for at the lower of cost or market, using the first-in, first-out method. Cost for inventories produced or modified by the Company through a manufacturing process includes fixed and variable production costs and raw materials costs, and in-bound freight costs. Cost for inventories purchased for resale includes the cost of the product and freight and handling costs incurred to place the product at the Companys point of sale.
Derivative Financial Instruments The Companys use of derivative financial instruments is limited to forwards, futures and certain other delivery contracts as discussed below. The Company enters into these contracts to limit its exposure to price volatility of various food oils that are critical to its processing and distribution activities. It is the Companys policy to remain substantially hedged with respect to edible oil product price risk; derivative contracts are used to maintain this hedged position. Forward purchase and sales contracts with established market participants as well as exchange traded futures contracts are
F-35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
entered into in amounts necessary to protect against price changes on raw materials needed for the Companys food oil processing and distribution activities. The Company also enters into purchase and sales commitments with major suppliers and customers at a specified premium or discount from a future market price (Basis Contracts). Additionally, the Companys policies do not permit speculative trading of such contracts. All of these qualify as derivatives under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and are stated at market value. Changes in market value are recognized in the consolidated statements of income, through cost of sales, in the periods such changes occur. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001 did not have a significant impact on the Companys results of operations, as the Company historically recorded its financial instruments at market value. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 133, the market value of futures contracts, Basis Contracts, and forward purchase and sales contracts were recorded as a component of inventory. Beginning with the adoption of SFAS No. 133, the market value of these contracts is now recorded separately on the consolidated balance sheets as derivative contract assets or liabilities. These contracts have maturities of less than one year.
The following summarizes the Companys
various derivative contracts outstanding at March 31, 2003
and 2002 (pounds and dollars in thousands)
Net
Unrealized
Forward Contracts and Commitments
Pounds
Gain (Loss)
334,100
$
11,060
433,300
(6,208
)
259,800
857
17,500
(126
)
146,000
958
1,190,700
$
6,541
490,500
$
7,873
454,100
(1,117
)
390,300
2,304
62,600
(303
)
96,100
421
1,493,600
$
9,178
The fair value of futures contracts is determined from quotes listed on the Chicago Board of Trade or other market makers. Forward purchase and sales contracts are with various counterparties, and the fair values of such contracts, are determined from the market price of the underlying product.
The Company is exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other parties to the contracts. However, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by counterparties.
F-36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property and
Depreciation
Property is
stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided for
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets, as follows:
40 years
3-19 years
10-25 years
3-20 years
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using the following methods and assumptions:
Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these instruments. | |
Lines of Credit The carrying amounts approximate fair value, as the interest rates are based upon variable reference rates. | |
Long-Term Debt The fair value of long-term fixed rate debt is estimated based upon prevailing market interest rates available to the Company. The Company estimates the fair value on the $25,573,000 6.55% fixed rate debt as of March 31, 2003 to be $27,804,000. |
Futures Contracts The fair value of futures contracts (used for hedging purposes) is determined from quotes listed principally on the Chicago Board of Trade.
Concentration of Credit Risk During the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, net sales to one customer were 23%, 22%, 22% and 21% of total net sales, respectively. This customer represents approximately 23% and 19% of trade receivables at March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains an allowance for potential credit losses.
The Company maintains cash deposits with various financial institutions. The Company periodically evaluates the credit standing of these financial institutions and has not sustained any credit losses relating to such balances.
Marketable Securities The Companys marketable securities comprise equity securities that have been classified as trading securities. The equity securities are carried at fair market value based upon quoted market prices. Unrealized gains and losses on equity securities are recognized in net income and totaled $666,000 and $(264,000) for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively (see Note 6).
Goodwill and Trademarks The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective April 1, 2002, the first day of its 2003 fiscal year. As a result, goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets (trademarks) are no longer amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators arise. See Note 8 for the effect of adopting SFAS No. 142.
Other identifiable intangible assets consist of patents, deferred financing costs and other assets, which are amortized using the straight-line method over 5 to 15 years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets, including identifiable intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are estimated. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded under the discounted future cash flow method.
F-37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Advertising Costs The Company expenses advertising costs in the period incurred. For the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company incurred advertising expenses of approximately $9,039,000, $7,100,000, $1,300,000 and $6,100,000, respectively.
Income Taxes The Company is a limited liability company and has no liability for federal and state income taxes. Income is taxed to the members based on their allocated share of taxable income or loss. However, certain states tax the income of limited liability companies. The Companys liability for such state income taxes is not significant.
Revenue Recognition The Company is a processor and distributor of edible oils used in food preparation and a packager of food products. Revenue is recognized upon transfer of title to the customer, which occurs generally upon shipment. In certain instances, title is transferred upon receipt by the customer, at which time the Company records revenue. Amounts billed to the customer as part of a sales transaction related to shipping and handling are included in sales. Revenue is recorded net of discounts, rebates and certain sales incentives.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods financial statements to conform to the 2003 presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. As required, the Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 143 prospectively to retirements of tangible long-lived assets, if any, initiated for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002.
In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, Reporting The Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. This statement retains the requirements of SFAS No. 121 to (a) recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and (b) measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset, and establishes a single accounting model, based on the framework established in SFAS No. 121, for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In November 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF Issue No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or Reseller of the Vendors Products, which addresses the accounting for consideration given by a vendor or a reseller of the vendors products. This new guidance requires companies to report certain consideration given by a vendor to a customer as a reduction in revenues rather than as marketing expense. This consensus was required to be adopted no later than the first quarter of 2002, and upon adoption, companies were required to retroactively reclassify such amounts in previously issued financial statements to comply with the income statement classification
F-38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
requirements of the consensus. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF Issue No. 01-09 during fiscal 2003. The effect of the adoption of EITF Issue No. 01-09 was a reduction in both revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses of $690,000, $207,000, $29,000 and $267,000 for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-03, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring ). This statement requires that the fair value of an initial liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred as opposed to when the entity commits to an exit plan, thereby eliminating the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. As required, the Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 146 prospectively to exit or disposal activities, if any, initiated after December 31, 2002.
In September 2002, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor, which addresses the accounting for consideration received by the reseller of the vendors products. This new guidance provides that the consideration represents a reimbursement of costs incurred by the customer to sell the vendors products and is generally presumed to be a reduction of the cost of the vendors products and, therefore, should be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales in the customers income statement. The Company adopted EITF Issue No. 02-16 during fiscal 2003. The effect of the adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-16 was a reduction in cost of goods sold and other income of $2,987,000, $1,628,000, $256,000 and $991,000 for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor about its obligations under certain guarantees. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FIN 45 specifically identifies certain obligations that are excluded from the provisions related to recognizing a liability at inception; however, these guarantees are subject to the disclosure requirements of FIN 45. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for all annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The new guidance amends SFAS No. 133 for decisions made as part of the Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) process that effectively required amendments to SFAS No. 133, and decisions made in connection with other FASB projects dealing with financial instruments and in connection with implementation issues raised in relation to the application of the definition of a derivative and characteristics of a derivative that contains financing components. In addition, it clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component that warrants special reporting in the statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30,
F-39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company is currently assessing, but has not yet determined, the impact this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
3. | Acquisitions |
During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company acquired substantially all the assets and liabilities of Sona and Hollen for $5,740,000. Sona and Hollen was a portion packing company located in Los Alamitos, California. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired, approximately $4,276,000, was recorded as goodwill. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on April 1, 2002, goodwill had been amortized using a 15-year life (see Note 8).
The following is a summary of the assets acquired
at estimated fair market value:
$
637,000
208,000
600,000
19,000
4,276,000
$
5,740,000
4. | Lines of Credit and Long-Term Debt |
Lines of Credit At March 31, 2003, the Company had a revolving line-of-credit agreement with a banking group to provide for borrowings of up to an aggregate of $72,000,000. Outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2003 and 2002 were $20,500,000 and $8,000,000, respectively. The applicable interest rates are based, at the option of the Company, at a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or a term federal funds rate (TFFR) option. The weighted-average interest rate at March 31, 2003 and 2002 was 1.72% and 2.24%, respectively. The lines of credit mature at varying dates between November 2003 and February 2004.
Long-Term Debt At March 31, 2003 and 2002, balances outstanding on term loans with a banking group were $71,605,000 and $81,905,000, respectively. The interest rate applicable to these term loans is based, at the option of the Company, at a TFFR-based, LIBOR-based or a fixed rate option. The weighted-average interest rate on such borrowings at March 31, 2003 and 2002 was 6.53% and 6.59%, respectively. The term loans with the banking group mature on December 23, 2003.
At March 31, 2003 and 2002, balances outstanding on a term loan with a bank were $25,573,000 and $28,031,000, respectively. The agreement requires quarterly principal and interest payments of $1,058,000. The interest rate on this term loan is fixed at 6.55%. The term loan with the bank matures in October 2011.
The term loans are collateralized by substantially all property, equipment and intellectual property rights, and the lines of credit are collateralized by substantially all trade receivables and inventories of the Company. The lines of credit and term loan agreements contain various covenants, including compliance with tangible net worth (as defined) and other financial ratios, restrictions on the payment of dividends, and restrictions on the incurrence of additional debt.
F-40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Annual maturities of long-term debt at
March 31, 2003 are as follows:
$
74,228,000
2,799,000
2,987,000
3,187,000
3,401,000
10,576,000
97,178,000
74,228,000
$
22,950,000
5. | Transactions with Affiliates |
At March 31, 2003, the Company had a receivable balance of $309,000 due from Wilsey for reimbursement of expenses paid by the Company on behalf of Wilsey.
Included in accounts payable at March 31, 2003 and 2002 were $8,035,000 and $5,976,000, respectively, payable to CHS for purchases of oil. Purchases from CHS for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000 were $66,682,000, $47,745,000, $8,575,000 and $48,916,000, respectively. Sales to CHS for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000 totaled $1,056,000, $883,000, $109,000 and $950,000, respectively.
Included in accounts payable at March 31, 2003 and 2002 were $790,000 and $817,000, respectively, payable to Mitsui USA for the Companys participation in Mitsui USAs insurance plans. During the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company recorded expenses of $9,402,000, $8,487,000, $1,380,000 and $5,049,000, respectively, in connection with its participation in such plans.
Included in trade receivables at March 31, 2003 and 2002 were $123,000 and $69,000, respectively, of receivables from Mitsui USA for product sales. Sales to Mitsui USA for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000 totaled $1,423,000, $1,406,000, $341,000 and $1,569,000, respectively.
Forward purchase contracts as of March 31, 2003 included commitments for purchases of 86,964,000 pounds of oil from CHS. The Company recognized gains (losses) of $1,081,000, $934,000, $1,788,000 and $(363,000) on such related party commitments for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively.
6. | Employee Benefit Plans |
The Company has long-term incentive arrangements for certain key executives. Benefits under the initial plan were based on earnings over a three-to-five year period (as defined) from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2001. An amount equal to the obligation incurred under the plan was contributed to a rabbi trust that would be available to general creditors in the event of bankruptcy. The trust holds investments primarily in marketable securities that are recorded at market value (classified as trading securities). The assets in the trust are to be distributed to the employees upon retirement. The liability under the arrangements was $13,574,000 and $14,240,000 as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and is included in deferred compensation obligation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On January 1, 2002, the Company established new long-term incentive arrangements with certain key executives. Under these arrangements, the amount of additional compensation is based on the attainment of cumulative income-based or equity-based targets over a two- to three-year period. At the end of the defined periods, amounts earned by individual executives will be contributed to a rabbi trust, unless representatives of Wilsey and CHS elect to pay such amounts directly to the respective key executives. At March 31, 2003 and 2002, a liability for the plan of $4,702,000 and $439,000, respectively, is classified as long-term deferred compensation obligation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
For the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company recognized compensation expense under the long-term incentive arrangements of $4,264,000, $5,658,000, $750,000 and $5,889,000, respectively.
The Company has a combined 401(k) and defined contribution profit-sharing plan (the Plan) covering substantially all employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements. Under the Plan, employees can make annual voluntary contributions not to exceed the lesser of an amount equal to 15% of their compensation or limits established by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company is required, by the Plan, to make certain matching contributions of up to 4% of each participants salary and may make discretionary profit-sharing contributions. The Company also established a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering employees under certain collective bargaining agreements. Under this plan, employees can make annual voluntary contributions of up to 15% of their compensation. Expense for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000 was $6,484,000, $5,855,000, $1,343,000 and $5,139,000, respectively. Certain of the Companys union employees are participants in multi-employer plans. Payments to multi-employer pension plans are negotiated in various collective bargaining agreements and aggregated $2,367,000, $1,162,000, $416,000 and $1,641,000 for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively. The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits and net assets available for benefits to union employees under these multi-employer pension plans is not available, as the Company does not administer these plans.
Effective January 1, 1999, the Company established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for certain of its employees. The projected benefit obligation as of March 31, 2003 and 2002 was $2,955,000 and $2,049,000, respectively. A liability of $2,220,000 and $1,668,000 as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, is included in long-term deferred compensation obligation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The plan is unfunded. During the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company recorded an expense related to the plan of $552,000, $111,000, $420,000 and $379,000, respectively.
The assumptions used in the measurement of the
Companys benefit obligation are as follows:
March 31
December 31
2003
2002
2001
2000
6.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
The Company accrues the actuarially determined amount necessary to fund the participants benefits in accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
F-42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum annual payments under
noncancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one
year at March 31, 2003 are as follows:
7.
Commitments and Contingencies
$
7,263,000
7,431,000
5,792,000
4,217,000
3,659,000
16,217,000
$
44,579,000
Under the lease agreements, the Company is obligated to pay certain property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Certain leases contain renewal and purchase options. Rental expense for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000 under operating leases totaled $7,138,000, $5,671,000, $1,476,000 and $5,205,000, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company received a payment of approximately $2,400,000 in connection with the settlement of a class action lawsuit. This amount has been recorded as a component of other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.
The Company is involved from time to time in routine legal matters incidental to its business. The Company believes that the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations.
8. | Goodwill |
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. These statements, among other things, eliminate the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations as of June 30, 2001, eliminate the amortization of goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets for all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and require that goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets be reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. The Company adopted SFAS Nos. 141 and 142 with respect to new goodwill as of July 1, 2001 and adopted SFAS No. 142 with respect to existing goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets as of April 1, 2002, the first day of its 2003 fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 did not impact the Companys financial condition or results of operations. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company ceased amortizing existing goodwill and trademarks.
The Company completed the transitional test of goodwill and trademarks during 2003. Based on the result of the test, the Company determined that there was no impairment of goodwill and trademarks as of April 1, 2002. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, goodwill and trademarks will be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates that goodwill or trademarks may be impaired. During 2003, the Company abandoned the use of certain trademarks with a net book value of $100,000.
F-43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of net income to the amount
adjusted for the exclusion of goodwill and trademarks
amortization follows for the years ended March 31, 2003 and
2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year
ended December 31, 2000:
March 31
December 31
2003
2002
2001
2000
$
70,558,000
$
70,486,000
$
14,368,000
$
57,506,000
3,972,000
1,036,000
4,001,000
1,853,000
421,000
1,684,000
$
70,558,000
$
76,311,000
$
15,825,000
$
63,191,000
Amortization expense for other intangible assets subject to amortization was $223,000, $402,000, $124,000 and $746,000 for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively. Estimated annual amortization for each of the years in the five-year period ending March 31, 2008 is $180,000.
9. | Quarterly Information (Unaudited) |
As discussed in Note 2, the Company changed
its fiscal year end to March 31. Audited financial
information for the three months ended March 31, 2001 has
been included herein. For comparison purposes, selected
unaudited financial information for the three months ended
March 31, 2000 is as follows:
$
211,815,000
172,818,000
17,123,000
362,382,000
231,789,000
130,593,000
F-44
Exhibit 10.10A
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
NOTE AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO NOTE AGREEMENT (this Amendment) is made to the Note Agreement dated June 19, 1998 (the Note Agreement) between CHS Inc. (formerly known as Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives), a nonstock agricultural cooperative organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the Company) and the Purchasers listed on Schedule A attached thereto, under which the Company issued and sold its 6.81% Series A Senior Notes due June 19, 2013 (the Notes). This Amendment shall be effective as of the time specified in Section 7 below.
WHEREAS, the Company has requested that the holders of the Notes agree to certain amendments to the Note Agreement as set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Company and holders of the Notes signing this Amendment desire to amend the Note Agreement as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, including the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Definitions . Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the definition given to them in the Note Agreement if defined therein.
2. Amendment to Section 6C . Section 6C of the Note Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:
6C. Priority Debt . The Company covenants that it will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, issue, incur or assume any Priority Debt if after giving effect thereto the aggregate outstanding principal amount of all Priority Debt would exceed 20% of Consolidated Net Worth at the time of such creation, issuance, incurrence or assumption.
3. Amendment to Article 6. Article 6 of the Note Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following Section 6J:
6J. Adjusted Consolidated Funded Debt to Consolidated Members and Patrons Equity . The Company shall not permit the ratio of Adjusted Consolidated Funded Debt to Consolidated Members and Patrons Equity to exceed .80 to 1.00 at any time.
4. Amendment to Section 10B, addition of Definitions . Section 10B of the Note Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following three definitions:
Adjusted Consolidated Funded Debt means Consolidated Funded Debt, plus the net present value of operating leases of the Company and its Subsidiaries as discounted by a rate of 10% per annum.
Consolidated Funded Debt means as of any date of determination, the total of all Funded Debt of the Company and its Subsidiaries outstanding on such date, after elimination all offsetting debits and credits between the Company and its Subsidiaries and all other items required to be eliminated in course of the preparation of consolidated financial statements of the Company and its Subsidiaries in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Consolidated Members and Patrons Equity means, with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, the amount of equity accounts, plus (or minus in the case of a deficit) the amount of surplus and retained earnings accounts of the Company and its Subsidiaries, plus (or minus in the case of a deficit) the minority interests in Subsidiaries; provided that the total amount of intangible assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries (including, without limitation, unamortized debt discount and expense, deferred charges and goodwill) included therein shall not exceed $30,000,000 (and to the extent such intangible assets exceed $30,000,000, they will not be included in the calculation of Consolidated Members and Patrons Equity); all as determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied.
5. Amendment to Section 10B, definition of Consolidated Cash Flow . Section 10B of the Note Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating the definition of Consolidated Cash Flow to read as follows:
Consolidated Cash Flow for any period shall mean the sum of (i) earnings before income taxes of the Company and its Subsidiaries for such period, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, plus (ii) the amounts that have been deducted in the determination of such earnings before income taxes for such period for (a) interest expense, (b) depreciation, (c) amortization, and (d) extraordinary non-cash or one-time non-cash losses, minus (iii) the amounts that have been included in the determination of such earnings before income taxes for such period for (a) one-time gains, (b) extraordinary income, (c) non-cash patronage income, and (d) non-cash equity earnings in joint ventures.
6. Company Representations . The Company hereby represents and warrants that, this Amendment has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by it and that, both
2
before and after giving effect to this Amendment, (a) each representation and warranty set forth in paragraph 8 of the Note Agreement is true and correct as of the date of execution and delivery of this letter by the Company with the same effect as if made on such date (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly refer to an earlier date, in which case they were true and correct as of such earlier date), and (b) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing under the Note Agreement.
7. Effective Date . This Amendment shall become effective when it has been executed by the Company and the Required Holder(s) and copies hereof as so executed shall have been delivered to the holders of the Notes.
8. General Provisions.
8.1 The Note Agreement, except as expressly modified herein, shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to be binding upon the parties thereto. |
8.2 The execution, delivery and effectiveness of the Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of the Purchasers under the Note Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Note Agreement. |
9. Reference to and Effect on Note Agreement . Upon the effectiveness of the amendments in this Amendment, each reference to the Note Agreement in any other document, instrument or agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Note Agreement as modified by this Amendment.
10. Expenses. The Company herby confirms its obligations under the Note Agreement, whether or not the transactions hereby contemplated are consummated, to pay, promptly after request by any holder of Notes, all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses, including attorneys fees and expenses, incurred by any holder of Notes in connection with this Amendment or the transactions contemplated hereby, in enforcing any rights under this Amendment, or in responding to any subpoena or other legal process or informal investigative demand issued in connection with this Amendment or the transactions contemplated hereby. The obligations of the Company under this Section 10 shall survive transfer by any holder of Notes of any Note and payment of any Note.
11. Governing Law . This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the rights of the parties shall be governed by, the law of the State of Illinois.
12. Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties to this Amendment in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Telefax copies of documents or signature pages bearing original signatures, and executed documents or signature pages delivered by telefax, shall, in each such instance, be deemed to be, and shall constitute and be treated
3
as, an original signed document or counterpart, as applicable. The section titles contained in this Amendment are and shall be without substance, meaning or content of any kind whatsoever and are not a part of the agreement between the parties hereto.
[EXECUTION PAGES BEGIN ON THE NEXT PAGE]
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Note Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the Effective Date.
COMPANY: | ||||
CHS Inc. | ||||
By: | ||||
|
||||
Name: John Schmitz | ||||
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief | ||||
Financial Officer |
5
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY | ||||||||||
OF AMERICA
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
THE MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Advantus Capital Management, Inc.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
MTL INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Advantus Capital Management, Inc.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
THE CATHOLIC AID ASSOCIATION
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Advantus Capital Management, Inc.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
6
NATIONAL TRAVELERS LIFE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Advantus Capital Management, Inc.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
UNITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Advantus Capital Management, Inc.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
PIONEER MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
GUARANTEE RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Bankers Trust Co.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
7
THE BALTIMORE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE
|
||||||||||
COMPANY OF AMERICA
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
8
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
COMPANION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
SUN LIFE FINANCIAL
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
9
MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
MIDLAND NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
PROVIDENT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
PROVIDENTMUTUAL LIFE AND ANNUITY
|
||||||||||
COMPANY OF AMERICA
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
10
AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By: Ameritas Investment Advisors, Inc. as Agent
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
THE SECURITY FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
WOODMEN ACCIDENT AND LIFE COMPANY
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Title:
|
||||||||||
|
11
Exhibit 10.15
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made effective as of September 1, 2003 by and between John D. Johnson (hereafter Johnson) and CHS, Inc., a Minnesota cooperative corporation (together with all affiliates, the Company).
1. | Employment |
The Company hereby agrees to and does hereby employ Johnson as its Chief Executive Officer, and Johnson hereby agrees to accept employment with the Company as Chief Executive Officer, for the period set forth in Paragraph 2 below (the period of employment) upon the other terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
2. | Period of Employment; Termination of Agreement |
The period of employment shall commence on the date of this Agreement and, subject to the provisions of Paragraphs 5 and 6 below, shall continue for a rolling three (3) year period, provided that Johnsons employment may be earlier terminated by either party subject to the rights and obligations of the parties set forth herein.
3. | Performance |
Throughout the period of employment, Johnson agrees to devote his full time and attention during normal business hours to the business of the Company, except for earned vacations and except for illness or incapacity.
4. | Compensation |
(a) | For all services to be rendered by Johnson in any capacity during the period of employment, Johnson shall be paid as annual compensation a base salary of at least $850,000. The Board will annually review Johnsons annual compensation and determine what is appropriate for a cost of living increase, merit increase, and/or increase in responsibilities or duties. |
(b) | During the term of his employment hereunder, Johnson shall be compensated pursuant to the plan in effect on September 1, 2003 with annual variable pay pursuant to the plan in effect during the term of this agreement. In addition, Johnson shall be eligible for long term variable pay. |
(c) | Johnson shall be entitled to receive all benefits set forth in the Special Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective the day of , 2003 (the Special SERP) or any successor plan. Johnson shall further be entitled to any additional employee benefits separately made available to him from time to time by the Board in its discretion. |
1
(d) | The Company shall bear such ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred by Johnson in performing his duties hereunder as the Company determines from time to time, provided that Johnson accounts promptly for such expenses to the Company in the manner prescribed from time to time by the Company. |
5. Termination with Severance Allowance
(a) | Termination by the Company Not for Cause. In the event of termination of the employment of Johnson by the Company during the period of employment for any reason other than for cause, as defined in paragraph 6(a), death or disability, the Company shall: |
(i) pay Johnson a severance allowance in the amount of 2.99 times the greater of
(A) his then-current base salary plus short-term and long-term target bonus (Target Bonus), or
(B) the amount payable in base salary plus Target Bonus for calendar year 2003;
(ii) provide a five-year enhancement to his retirement plan, except that no such enhancement shall be provided if the termination occurs after Johnson has attained the age of 60;
(iii) include the amount of the severance paid as salary or wages for purposes of computing the pension cash balance and Special SERP calculation;
(iv) bear the entire cost of Johnsons COBRA family health insurance coverage for one (1) year;
(v) continue his family health insurance thereafter up to age 65 (or any revised age for Medicare eligibility), upon Johnsons payment of the retiree premium rate, except for any period during which Johnson is eligible for coverage, without any exclusions for preexisting conditions, through another employee group plan; and
(vi) continue his existing executive perquisites for a period of three (3) years.
Said severance allowance shall be in lieu of all other severance payable to Johnson under Company severance policies.
(b) | Termination by Johnson in the event of Consolidation. In the event of a full consolidation of the Companys business with the business of any other entity, if Johnson is not offered the position of Chief Executive Officer of the combined entity, this may be deemed at Johnsons option to be an event of termination without cause. In that event, the Company shall: |
(i) pay Johnson a severance allowance in the amount of 2.99 times the greater of
2
(A) his then-current base salary plus Target Bonus, or
(B) the amount payable in base salary plus Target Bonus for calendar year 2003;
(ii) provide a five-year enhancement to his retirement plan, except that no such enhancement shall be provided if the termination occurs after Johnson has attained the age of 60;
(iii) include the amount of the severance paid as salary or wages for purposes of computing the pension cash balance and Special SERP calculation;
(iv) bear the entire cost of Johnsons COBRA family health insurance coverage for one (1) year;
(v) continue his family health insurance thereafter up to age 65 (or any revised age for Medicare eligibility), upon Johnsons payment of the retiree premium rate, except for any period during which Johnson is eligible for coverage, without any exclusions for preexisting conditions, through another employee group plan; and
(vi) continue his existing executive perquisites for a period of three (3) years.
Said severance allowance shall be in lieu of all other severance payable to Johnson under Company severance policies.
(c) Additional Payments. In the event that Johnson becomes entitled to payments under paragraph 5(a) or 5(b) of this Agreement, the Company shall cause its independent auditors promptly to review, at the Companys sole expense, the applicability of Section 4999 of the Code to such payments. If such auditors shall determine that any payment or distribution of any type by the Company to Johnson or for his benefit, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise (the Total Payments), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, or any interest or penalties with respect to such excise tax (such excise tax, together with any such interest and penalties, are collectively referred to as the Excise Tax), then Johnson shall be entitled to receive an additional cash payment (a Gross-Up Payment) within 30 days of such determination equal to an amount such that after payment by Johnson of all taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including any Excise Tax, imposed upon the Gross-Up Payment, Johnson would retain an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Total Payments. For purposes of the foregoing determination, Johnsons tax rate shall be deemed to be the highest statutory marginal state and Federal tax rate (on a combined basis) (including Johnsons share of F.I.C.A. and Medicare taxes) then in effect. If no determination by the Companys auditors is made prior to the time a tax return reflecting the Total Payments is required to be filed by Johnson, he will be entitled to receive a Gross-Up Payment calculated on the basis of the Total Payments reported by Johnson in such tax return, within 30 days of the filing of such tax return. In
3
all events, if any tax authority determines that a greater Excise Tax should be imposed upon the Total Payments than is determined by the Companys independent auditors or reflected in Johnsons tax return pursuant to this Section 6, Johnson shall be entitled to receive the full Gross-Up Payment calculated on the basis of the amount of Excise Tax determined to be payable by such tax authority from the Company within 30 days of such determination.
(d) Request and Release. In order to obtain the severance allowance provided for in this Agreement, Johnson must submit a request for severance and must sign a complete release of all claims. The Company shall have no obligation to pay any severance allowance unless and until Johnson shall have submitted the request for severance and signed a full and complete release of all claims, to be drafted by Legal Counsel for the Company.
6. Termination without Severance Allowance
(a) | Termination by the Company for Cause. The Company may terminate Johnsons employment for cause without incurring further obligation. For the purpose of this Agreement, termination of Johnsons employment shall be deemed to have been for cause only: |
(i) | if termination of Johnsons employment shall have been the result of an act or acts of fraud, theft or embezzlement on the part of Johnson which, if convicted, would constitute a felony and which results or which is intended to result directly or indirectly in gain or personal enrichment of Johnson at the expense of the Company; or |
(ii) | if termination of Johnsons employment results from Johnsons willful and material misconduct, including willful and material failure to perform his duties, and Johnson has been given written notice by the Board of Directors with respect to such and Johnson does not cure within a reasonable time; or |
(iii) | if there has been a breach by Johnson during the period of employment of the provisions of Paragraph 3 above, relating to the time to be devoted to the affairs of the Company, and with respect to any alleged breach of Paragraph 3 hereof, Johnson shall have substantially failed to remedy such alleged breach within thirty days from Johnsons receipt of notice from the Board of Directors. |
(b) | Nonrenewal of Agreement. The Company may elect not to renew this Agreement, and thereby to terminate Johnsons employment hereunder without any severance obligations, upon at least three (3) years prior written notice to Johnson. |
(c) | Termination by Johnson. Johnson shall have the right to terminate his employment in his sole discretion, with or without cause, by providing thirty (30) |
4
days notice of his intent to resign. Johnson shall in that event receive no further compensation or severance allowance.
(d) | Death. In the event of Johnsons death during the period of employment, the legal representative of Johnson shall be entitled to the base or fixed salary provided for in Paragraph 4(a) above for the month in which death shall have occurred, at the rate being paid at the time of death, and the period of employment shall be deemed to have ended as of the close of business on the last day of the month in which death shall have occurred but without prejudice to any benefits, such as life insurance, otherwise due in respect of Johnsons death. |
(e) | Disability |
(i) | In the event of Johnsons disability during the period of employment, Johnson shall be entitled to an amount equal to the base or fixed salary provided for in Paragraph 4(a) above, at the rate being paid at the time of the commencement of disability, for the period of such disability but not in excess of twelve (12) months from the beginning of the period that establishes such disability, as described in Paragraph 6(e)(iii) below. |
(ii) | The amount of any payments due under Paragraph 6(e)(i) shall be reduced by any payments to which Johnson may be entitled for the same period because of disability under any disability or pension plan of the Company or of any division, subsidiary, or affiliate thereof, or as the result of workers compensation or nonoccupational disability payments received from any government entity. |
(iii) | The term Disability as used in this Agreement, shall mean an illness or accident occurring during the period of employment which prevents Johnson from performing the essential functions of his job under this Agreement, with reasonable accommodations (as defined by federal and Minnesota disability laws), for a period of six consecutive months. The period of employment shall be deemed to have ended as of the close of business on the last day of such six-month period but without prejudice to any payments due Johnson from any disability policy or disability insurance. |
7. Noncompetition
Johnson agrees that during the term of his employment and thereafter for a period of two (2) years, he will not directly or indirectly engage in or carry on a business that is in direct competition with any significant business unit of the Company as conclusively determined by the Board of Directors. Further, Johnson agrees that during this same period of time he will not act as an agent, representative, consultant, officer, director, independent contractor or employee of any entity or enterprise that is in direct competition with any significant business unit of the Company as conclusively determined by the Board of Directors.
5
8. Nondisclosure of Confidential Information
Johnson, except in connection with his employment hereunder, will not disclose to any person or entity, either during the Period of Employment or at any time thereafter, any confidential information acquired by Johnson while employed by the Company. This protected confidential information includes the Companys trade secrets, technical information, contracts, systems, procedures, business plans, internal reports, and personnel files and information. Johnson agrees and acknowledges that all of such information, in any form, is and will remain the sole and exclusive property of the Company.
9. Successor in Interest
This Agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, and shall also bind and inure to the benefit of any successor of the Company by merger or consolidation or any purchaser or assignee of all or substantially all of its assets, but, except to any such successor, purchaser, or assignee of the Company, neither this Agreement nor any rights or benefits hereunder may be assigned by either party hereto.
10. Construction
Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement shall be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
11. Governing Laws
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
12. Notices
Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall
be sufficient if in writing, sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested:
If to Johnson:
John D. Johnson
10 Echo Lake Blvd.
Mahtomedi, MN 55115
If to the Company:
Chairman of the Board
CHS, Inc.
5500 CENEX Drive
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
6
With a copy to:
General Counsel
CHS, Inc.
5500 CENEX Drive
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
13. Entire Agreement
This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties, superseding the parties Agreement of September 1, 2000 and any prior agreements. This Agreement may not be modified or amended, and no waiver shall be effective, unless by written document signed by the Chairman of the Board and Johnson.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as
of the date set forth above.
CHS, Inc.
By:
John D. Johnson
Its:
7
Exhibit 10.16
CHS, INC.
SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
ARTICLE I
INTRODUCTION
Section 1.1. Adoption. CHS, Inc. (CHS) hereby adopts the CHS, Inc. Special Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the Plan) effective this day of , 2003, for the purpose of providing benefits for certain of its employees who are part of a select group of management or highly compensated employees.
Section 1.2. Purpose. The purpose of this Plan is to provide specified benefits to a select group of senior management and highly compensated employees who contribute materially to the continued growth, development and future business success of CHS. This Plan shall be unfunded for tax purposes and for purpose of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time (ERISA).
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
Section 2.1. Definitions. When used in this Plan document, the following terms have the meanings indicated unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context.
Account means an account established for a Participant under the terms of the Plan.
Administrator means the person or persons appointed by CHS (or its Board) to administer the Plan. If CHS does not appoint an Administrator, the Board will be the Administrator.
Annual Incentive Pay means the annual incentive pay paid to a Participant pursuant to the Annual Incentive Plan.
Annual Incentive Plan means the Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives Annual Incentive Plan dated , .
Base Pay means the annual compensation, excluding bonuses, commissions, overtime, relocation expenses, incentive payments, non-monetary awards, fringe benefits, retainers, directors fees and other fees, severance allowances, pay in lieu of vacations, insurance premiums paid by CHS, insurance benefits paid to the Participant or his Beneficiary, CHS contributions to qualified or nonqualified plans, automobile and other allowances paid to a Participant for services rendered. Base Pay will be calculated prior to reduction for compensation voluntarily deferred or contributed by the Participant for qualified or nonqualified plans and will include amounts not otherwise
included in the Participants gross income under Code Sections 125, 401(k), 402(e)(3), 402(h), or 403(b).
Beneficiary means the person, persons or entity designated in writing by the Participant on forms provided by the Administrator to receive distribution of certain death benefits under the Plan in the event of the Participants death. A Participant may change the designated Beneficiary from time to time by filing a new written designation with the Administrator, and such designation shall be effective upon receipt by the Administrator. If a Participant has not designated a Beneficiary, or if a designated Beneficiary is not living or in existence at the time of a Participants death, any death benefits payable under the Plan shall be paid to the Participants spouse, if then living, and if the Participants spouse is not then living, to the Participants estate.
Board means the Board of Directors of CHS.
Change of Control means the first to occur of either of the following events:
(a) Date that any one person, or group of persons acting as a group, acquires ownership of shares of CHS that, together with shares already held by the person or group, possesses more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of CHS shares. However, the acquisition of additional shares by the same person or group is not considered a change of control.
(b) CHS sells to an unrelated third party or parties (at one time or within any two-year period) one third of the fair market value of its assets and the assets of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
CHS means CHS, Inc.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Committee means the committee of CHS as described in Section 6.3 of the Plan.
ERISA means the Employee Retirement Income Security At of 1974, as amended.
Participant means a person who has satisfied the requirements of Section 2.1.
Plan means the CHS, Inc. Special Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as it may be amended from time to time.
Plan Year means the twelve (12) month period that begins on , and ends on .
- 2 -
Total Disability means total disability as defined by CHS long-term disability plan.
Year of Service means a Plan Year during which a Participant is continuously employed by CHS.
Section 2.2. Performance of Obligations. CHS agrees to perform its obligations in accordance with the Plan.
Section 2.3. Gender and Number. The singular form of any word will include the plural and the masculine gender will include the feminine wherever necessary for the proper interpretation of this Plan.
ARTICLE III
PARTICIPATION
Section 3.1. Eligibility and Participation. The Chief Executive Officer of CHS as of the effective date of this Plan will be eligible to participate in this Plan on the date designated by the Board. The Board may from time to time designate additional executives for inclusion in the Plan in its sole discretion.
Section 3.2. Status as Participant. A person who becomes a Participant will remain a Participant in the Plan until all benefits payable to such person under the Plan have been distributed.
ARTICLE IV
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT
Section 4.1. Amount of Benefit. A supplemental retirement benefit will be payable to a Participant under this Article IV. The amount of the Participants benefit under the Plan shall be the sum of all amounts credited to an Account established in the Participants name under this Article IV.
Section 4.2. Account. CHS shall establish and maintain an Account for each Participant to which amounts will be credited under this Section 4.2. Each Participants Account shall be a separate bookkeeping account established and maintained for the Participant representing separate unfunded and unsecured general obligations of CHS with respect to the Participant and to which are credited the amounts determined in accordance with this Section 4.2.
(a) Base Benefit Amount. As of the end of each Plan Year for which a Participant completes a Year of Service, an amount will be credited to the Participants Account equal to the amount set forth in Schedule A, which shall be attached to this Plan and incorporated herein, for the Plan Year for which such Year of Service was completed. Any amounts not so credited to the Participants Account for any Plan Year due to the Participants death, Total Disability, termination of employment or a Change of Control will be forfeited. After the amounts set forth in Schedule A have been so
- 3 -
credited to the Participants Account or forfeited pursuant to this subsection (a), no further amounts shall be credited to the Participants Account under this subsection (a).
(b) Performance-based Amount. As of the end of each Plan Year for which a Participant completes a Year of Service, an amount will be credited to the Participants Account equal to an amount not to exceed the amount set forth in Schedule B, which shall be attached to this Plan and incorporated herein, for the Plan Year for which such Year of Service was completed. If an amount shall be credited to a Participants Account for any Plan Year pursuant to this subsection (b), such amount will be determined by the Board or Committee, provided the authority for making such determination has been so delegated to the Committee, based on the Participants performance for the Plan Year for which such determination is made pursuant to the performance standards under the Annual Incentive Plan. By way of example, if a Participant receives sixty percent (60%) of his or her maximum Annual Incentive Pay for a particular year pursuant to the Annual Incentive Plan, an amount equal to sixty percent (60%) of the amount set forth in Schedule B for the Plan Year for which such determination is made will be credited to the Participants Account under this Plan. Any amounts not so credited to the Participants Account for any Plan Year due to the Participants death, Total Disability, termination of employment or a Change of Control will be forfeited. After the appropriate percentage of the amounts set forth in Schedule B have been so credited to the Participants Account or forfeited pursuant to this subsection (b), no further amounts shall be credited to the Participants Account under this subsection (b).
(c) Earnings. As of the end of each Plan Year, the amount credited to each Participants Account will be adjusted by an amount equal to the product of: (i) an interest rate of eight percent (8%), and (ii) the balance in the Participants Account prior to the credit of any amounts for the immediately following Plan Year pursuant to Section 4.2 (a) or (b) (i.e., the opening account balance).
Section 4.3. Vesting. For purposes of conceptually determining the benefit that may be payable to a Participant under the Plan, the Participants interest in the Plan shall at all times be fully vested.
ARTICLE V
DISTRIBUTIONS
Section 5.1. Commencement of Benefits. Subject to Sections 5.3, 5.4 and 5.6 of this Plan, benefits under the Plan will be distributed beginning on the first day of the sixth (6th) month of the Plan Year following the earliest to occur of the Participants death, Total Disability, or termination of employment.
Section 5.2. Form of Distribution. CHS shall pay the Participant or his Beneficiaries the vested portion of the Participants Account in one of the following methods elected by the Participant or the Participants Beneficiary in writing:
(a) One lump sum payment; or
- 4 -
(b) A series of annual payments made over a period of years not to exceed ten (10); or
(c) One of the following annuity options:
(1) Single life annuity (with level payments made for the annuitants lifetime that cease upon the annuitants death).
(2) Joint life and one-half survivor annuity (with full level payments made as long as both the annuitant and joint annuitant are alive, and upon the death of either the annuitant or joint annuitant, fifty percent (50%) reduced, level payments to continue to the survivor for as long he or she is alive).
Any benefits payable under the Plan in the form of an annuity shall be payable from the assets of CHS. No annuity contract shall be required to be purchased or distributed to or on behalf of the Participant pursuant to this subsection (c).
(d) A Participant must make an election in writing no later than six (6) months prior to the beginning of the Plan Year in which a distribution is to be made as to the form or commencement date of a benefit. If no such election is made as to the form, distribution shall be made in the form of a single lump sum payment unless the Board or Committee determines otherwise and so informs the Participant.
Section 5.3. Death Benefit. Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, in the event of the death of a Participant prior to the payment of the entire amount credited to the Participants Account, any unpaid amounts shall be paid to the Participants Beneficiary as soon as practicable after the Participants death.
Section 5.4. Disability. Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, in the event of the Total Disability of a Participant prior to the payment of the entire amount credited to the Participants Account, any unpaid amounts shall be paid to the Participant as soon as practicable after the Participants Total Disability.
Section 5.5. Distribution for Taxes. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, if, at any time, a court of competent jurisdiction or the Internal Revenue Service determines that an amount credited to a Participants Account is includable in the gross income of the Participant and subject to tax, CHS may, in its sole discretion, permit a lump sum distribution of an amount equal to the amount determined to be includable in the Participants gross income.
Section 5.6. Change of Control. Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, in the event of a Change of Control of CHS, all Participants shall be paid the entire amounts credited to their Accounts as of that date in the form of single lump sum distributions on the January 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in
- 5 -
which occurs such Change of Control. Amounts not credited to any Participants Account as of the date on which the Change of Control occurs shall be forfeited.
ARTICLE VI
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
Section 6.1. Interpretation. The Plan will be administered by the Administrator which will have the authority, duty and power to interpret and construe the provisions of the Plan as it deems appropriate, to resolve all factual and legal questions concerning the status and rights of a Participant and a Beneficiary, to determine whether a Participant or Beneficiary is entitled to any benefits that may be payable under the Plan. The Administrator will have the duty and responsibility of maintaining records, making the requisite calculations and dispersing the payments hereunder. The Administrators interpretations, determinations, regulations and calculations will be final and binding on all persons and parties concerned.
Section 6.2. General Administration. The Administrator will be responsible for the general operation and administration of the Plan and for carrying out the provisions thereof. The Administrator will have the authority to establish and revise rules, procedures and regulations relating to the Plan and to make any other determinations which it believes necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Administrator will be responsible for the expenses incurred in the administration of the Plan. The Administrator will be entitled to rely conclusively upon all tables, valuations, certificates, opinions and reports furnished by any actuary, accountant, controller, counsel or other person employed or engaged by the Administrator with respect to the Plan.
Section 6.3. Committee. A Committee consisting of one (1) or more members appointed by the Board will act for CHS under the Plan, unless the Plan specifically indicates that the Board or other persons are to act for CHS with respect to a specified matter under the Plan. If such Board does not appoint anyone to the Committee or if all members resign or otherwise cease to be members of the Committee, such Board or any officer designated by the Board will act for CHS until it makes any appointments under this section.
Section 6.4. Records. The records of the Plan will be maintained on the Plan Year.
ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION
Section 7.1. Amendment or Termination. CHS intends the Plan to be permanent but, subject to Section 5.6 of this Plan, reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Any such amendment or termination will be made pursuant to a resolution of CHS Board and will be effective as of the date provided in the resolution. An amendment will be stated in an instrument in writing signed in the
- 6 -
name of CHS by a person authorized by the Board and all parties interested herein will be bound thereby.
Section 7.2. Impact on Benefits. No amendment or termination of the Plan will directly or indirectly reduce any benefit described in Article IV of the Plan as of the effective date of such amendment or termination. Subject to Section 5.6 of this Plan, a Participants Account under the Plan will not be credited with additional amounts, other than amounts determined under subsection (c) of Section 4.2, after the termination of the Plan and will be determined under the appropriate provisions of the Plan as if the Participant did not accumulate any additional service after the effective date of such termination and did not have any increase in compensation after that date. Upon the termination of the Plan, distribution of benefits payable under the Plan will be made to each Participant or the Participants Beneficiary or surviving spouse in accordance with Article V of the Plan.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 8.1. Responsibility for Benefits and Expenses. CHS will pay benefits arising under the Plan and all costs, charges and expenses related thereto. CHS may anticipate its obligations under this Plan by establishing a trust or purchasing any insurance or other contract; provided, however, that such funding vehicle will not:
(a) change the status of this Plan as an unfunded plan both for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of ERISA; or
(b) change the rights of a Participant or the Participants Beneficiary or surviving spouse under Section 8.3 of the Plan.
Section 8.2. Inalienability. The benefits payable hereunder or the right to receive future benefits under the Plan may not be anticipated, alienated, sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, encumbered, or subjected to any charge or legal process; and no interest or right to receive a benefit may be taken, either voluntarily or involuntarily, for the satisfaction of the debts of, or other obligations or claims against, such person or entity, including claims for alimony, support, separate maintenance and claims in bankruptcy proceedings.
Section 8.3. Unsecured Claim. The right of a Participant or the Participants Beneficiary or surviving spouse to receive a distribution hereunder will be an unsecured claim against the general assets of CHS, and neither a Participant nor his or her Beneficiary or surviving spouse will have any rights in or against any amount credited to any Account under the Plan or any other assets of CHS. The Plan will at all times be considered entirely unfunded both for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of ERISA.
Section 8.4. Plan Administered According to Its Terms. No Participant, Beneficiary or surviving spouse will have any right to a benefit under the Plan except in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Establishment of the Plan will not be construed
- 7 -
to give any Participant the right to be retained in the service of CHS. The sole rights of a Participant or his or her Beneficiary or surviving spouse under the Plan will be to have the Plan administered according to its terms, and to receive whatever benefits he or she may be entitled to hereunder.
Section 8.5. Impact of Corporate Change. The Plan will not be automatically terminated by a transfer or sale of assets of CHS or by the merger or consolidation of CHS into or with any other corporate or other entity, but the Plan will be continued after such sale, merger or consolidation only if and to the extent that the transferee, purchaser or successor entity agrees to continue the Plan. In the event the Plan is not continued by the transferee, purchaser or successor entity, then the Plan will terminate subject to the provisions of Article VII and Section 5.6 of the Plan.
Section 8.6. Governing Law. To the extent not pre-empted by the laws of the United States of America, the laws of the State of Minnesota shall be the controlling state law in all matters relating to this Plan.
Section 8.7. Severability. If any provisions of this Plan shall be held
illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not
affect the remaining parts of this Plan, but this Plan shall be construed and
enforced as if the illegal and invalid provisions never had been included
herein.
Section 8.8. Taxes. CHS has the right to deduct from all payments made
under the Plan to a Participant, the Participants Beneficiary or surviving
spouse any federal, state, local or other taxes required by law to be withheld
with respect to such payments.
Executed this
day
of
, 2003.
CHS, Inc.
By:
Title:
- 8 -
SCHEDULE A
Annual Special SERP Contributions
Year
Age
SERP Contribution
54
55
$
263,663
56
$
263,663
57
$
263,663
58
$
263,663
59
$
263,663
60
$
306,163
61
$
350,428
62
$
395,481
- 9 -
SCHEDULE B
Annual Maximum Performance-Based
Special SERP Contributions
Year
Age
SERP Contribution
54
55
$
83,272
56
$
83,272
57
$
83,272
58
$
83,272
59
$
83,272
60
$
83,272
61
$
83,272
62
$
83,272
- 10 -
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
STATE OF
INCORPORATION/
SUBSIDIARY
ORGANIZATION
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-2 (No. 333-65364) and Form S-8 (No. 333-42153) of our
report dated November 5, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements
of CHS Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2003, which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 20, 2003
Exhibit 23.2
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-65364 on Form S-2 and Registration Statement No. 333-42153 on Form S-8 of
CHS Inc. of our report dated June 16, 2003 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
in 2002) on the consolidated financial statements of
Ventura Foods, LLC and subsidiary, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of CHS Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2003.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
November 19, 2003
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below hereby constitutes and appoints John D. Johnson and John Schmitz,
and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or
her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign
a Form 10-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of CHS Inc. and any
and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
full power and authority to do and perform to all intents and purposes as he or
she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or the substitutes for such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Name
Title
Date
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE
I, John D. Johnson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K of CHS Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a. designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
b. evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c. disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
a. all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
/s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: November 21, 2003
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE
I, John Schmitz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K of CHS Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a. designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
b. evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c. disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
a. all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
/s/ JOHN SCHMITZ
John Schmitz
Executive vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 21, 2003
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
In connection with the Annual Report of CHS Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John D. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive
Officer
November 21, 2003
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
In connection with the Annual Report of CHS Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ JOHN SCHMITZ
John Schmitz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
November 21, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.1
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
CHS Inc. (the Company, we, our, us) and its representatives and agents may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act). Words and phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate, project and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
The Companys forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. This Cautionary Statement is for the purpose of qualifying for the safe harbor provisions of the Act and is intended to be a readily available written document that contains factors which could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The following matters, among others, may have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations or prospects, financial or otherwise, of the Company. Reference to this Cautionary Statement in the context of a forward-looking statement shall be deemed to be a statement that any one or more of the following factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those which might be projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted by the Company in the forward-looking statement or statements.
The following factors are in addition to any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or referred to in connection with any particular forward-looking statement. The following review of factors pursuant to the Act should not be construed as exhaustive or as an admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Company prior to the effective date of the Act.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
Our revenues and operating results could be adversely affected by changes in commodity prices. Our revenues and earnings are affected by market prices for commodities such as crude oil, natural gas, grain, oilseeds, and flour. Commodity prices generally are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including the weather, disease, insect damage, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulation and policies, and general political and economic conditions. Increases in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding increase in the prices of our products or our sales volume or a decrease in our other operating expenses could reduce our revenues and net income. We are also exposed to fluctuating commodity prices as the result of our inventories of commodities, typically grain and petroleum products, and purchase and sale contracts at fixed or partially fixed prices. At any time, our inventory levels and unfulfilled fixed or partially fixed price contract obligations may be substantial.
Our operating results could be adversely affected if our members were to do business with others rather than with us. We do not have an exclusive relationship with our members and our members are not obligated to supply us with their products or purchase products from us. Our members often have a variety of distribution outlets and product sources available to them. If our members were to sell their products to other purchasers or purchase products from other sellers, our revenues would decline and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
We participate in highly competitive business markets in which we may not be able to continue to compete successfully. We operate in several highly competitive business segments. Competitive factors include price, service level, proximity to markets, product quality and marketing. In some of our business segments, such as Energy, we compete with companies that are larger, better known and have greater marketing, financial, personnel and other resources. Our competitors may succeed in developing new or enhanced products that are better than ours, and may be more successful in marketing and selling their
Changes in federal income tax laws or in our tax status could increase our tax liability and reduce our net income. Current federal income tax laws, regulations and interpretations regarding the taxation of cooperatives, which allow us to exclude income generated through business with or for a member (patronage income) from our taxable income, could be changed. If this occurred, or if in the future we were not eligible to be taxed as a cooperative, our tax liability would significantly increase and our net income significantly decrease.
We incur significant costs in complying with applicable laws and regulations. Any failure to make the capital investments necessary to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us to financial liability. We are subject to numerous federal, state and local provisions regulating our business and operations. We incur and expect to incur significant capital and operating expenses to comply with these laws and regulations, but may be unable to pass on those expenses to customers without experiencing volume and margin losses. For example, capital expenditures for upgrading our refineries, largely to comply with regulations requiring the reduction of sulfur levels in refined petroleum products, are expected to be approximately $87.0 million for our Laurel, Montana refinery and $324.0 million for NCRAs McPherson, Kansas refinery, of which $8.7 million had been spent at the Laurel refinery and $36.5 million had been spent by NCRA at the McPherson refinery as of August 31, 2003. The Company expects all of these compliance capital expenditures at the refineries to be complete by December 31, 2005, and anticipates funding these projects with a combination of cash flows from operations and debt proceeds.
We establish reserves for the future cost of meeting known compliance obligations, such as remediation of identified environmental issues. However, these reserves may prove inadequate to meet our actual liability. Moreover, amended, new or more stringent requirements, stricter interpretations of existing requirements or the future discovery of currently unknown compliance issues may require us to make material expenditures or subject us to liabilities that we currently do not anticipate.
Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to administrative penalties and injunctive relief, civil remedies including fines and injunctions, and recalls of our products. We cannot predict what impact, if any, future laws or regulations may have on our business and operations.
Environmental liabilities could adversely affect our results and financial condition. Many of our current and former facilities have been in operation for many years and, over that time, we and other operators of those facilities have generated, used, stored and disposed of substances or wastes that are or might be considered hazardous under applicable environmental laws, including chemicals and fuels stored in underground and above-ground tanks. Any past or future actions in violation of applicable environmental laws could subject us to administrative penalties, fines and injunctions. Moreover, future or unknown past releases of hazardous substances could subject us to private lawsuits claiming damages and to adverse publicity.
Actual or perceived quality, safety or health risks associated with our products could subject us to liability and damage our business and reputation. If any of our food products became adulterated or misbranded, we would need to recall those items and could experience product liability claims if consumers were injured as a result. A widespread product recall or a significant product liability judgment could cause our products to be unavailable for a period of time or a loss of consumer confidence in our products. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. In addition, general public perceptions regarding the quality, safety or health risks associated with particular food products, such as the concern in some quarters regarding genetically modified crops, could reduce demand and prices for some of the products associated with our businesses. To the extent that consumer preferences evolve away from products that our members or we produce for health or other reasons, such as the growing demand for organic food products, and we are unable to
Our operations are subject to business interruptions and casualty losses; we do not insure against all potential losses and could be seriously harmed by unexpected liabilities. Our operations are subject to business interruptions due to unanticipated events such as explosions, fires, pipeline interruptions, transportation delays, equipment failures, crude oil or refined product spills, inclement weather and labor disputes. For example:
| our oil refineries and other facilities are potential targets for terrorist attacks that could halt or discontinue production; | |
| our inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with unionized workers in our operations could result in strikes or work stoppages; and | |
| the significant inventories that we carry could be damaged or destroyed by catastrophic events, extreme weather conditions or contamination. |
We maintain insurance against many, but not all, potential losses or liabilities arising from these operating hazards, but uninsured losses or losses above our coverage limits are possible. Uninsured losses and liabilities arising from operating hazards could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Our cooperative structure limits our ability to access equity capital. As a cooperative, we may not sell common equity in our company. In addition, existing laws and our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain limitations on dividends of 8% of any preferred stock that we may issue. These limitations restrict our ability to raise equity capital and may adversely affect our ability to compete with enterprises that do not face similar restrictions.
Consolidation among the producers of products we purchase and customers for products we sell could adversely affect our revenues and operating results. Consolidation has occurred among the producers of products we purchase, including crude oil and grain. Consolidation could increase the price of these products and allow suppliers to negotiate pricing and other contract terms that are less favorable to us. Consolidation also may increase the competition among consumers of these products to enter into supply relationships with a smaller number of producers.
Consolidation among purchasers of our products and in wholesale and retail distribution channels has resulted in a smaller customer base for our products and intensified the competition for these customers. For example, ongoing consolidation among distributors and brokers of food products and food retailers has altered the buying patterns of these businesses, as they have increasingly elected to work with product suppliers who can meet their needs nationwide rather than just regionally or locally. If these distributors, brokers, and retailers elect not to purchase our products, our sales volumes, revenues, and profitability could be significantly reduced.
Fluctuations in prices for crude oil and refined fuel products may adversely affect our earnings. Prices for crude oil and for gasoline, diesel fuel, and other refined petroleum products fluctuate widely. The profitability of our energy operations depends largely on the margin between the cost of crude oil that we refine and the selling prices that we obtain for our refined products. Factors influencing these prices, many of which are beyond our control, include:
| levels of worldwide and domestic supplies; | |
| capacities of domestic and foreign refineries; | |
| the ability of the members of OPEC to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls, and the price and level of foreign imports generally; | |
| political instability or armed conflict in oil-producing regions; | |
| the level of consumer demand; |
| the price and availability of alternative fuels; | |
| the availability of pipeline capacity; and | |
| domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes. |
The long-term effects of these and other conditions on the prices of crude oil and refined petroleum products are uncertain and ever-changing. Accordingly, we expect our margins on and the profitability of our energy business to fluctuate, possibly significantly, over time.
If our customers chose alternatives to our refined petroleum products our revenues and profits may decline. Numerous alternative energy sources currently under development that could serve as alternatives to our gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products. If any of these alternative products become more economically viable or preferable to our products for environmental or other reasons, demand for our energy products would decline. Demand for our gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products also could be adversely affected by increased fuel efficiencies.
Our agronomy business is depressed and could continue to underperform in the future. Demand for agronomy products in general has been adversely affected in recent years by drought and poor weather conditions, idle acreage and development of insect and disease-resistant crops. These factors could cause Agriliance, LLC, an agronomy marketing and distribution venture in which we own a minority interest, to be unable to operate at profitable margins. In addition, these and other factors, including fluctuations in the price of natural gas and other raw materials, an increase in recent years in domestic and foreign production of fertilizer, and intense competition within the industry, in particular from lower-cost foreign producers, have created particular pressure on producers of fertilizers. As a result, CF Industries, Inc., a fertilizer manufacturer in which we hold a minority cooperative interest, has suffered significant losses in recent years as it has incurred increased prices for raw materials but has been unable to pass those increased costs on to its customers.
Technological improvements in agriculture could decrease the demand for our agronomy products. Technological advances in agriculture could decrease the demand for crop nutrients, and other crop input products and services. Genetically engineered seeds that resist disease and insects or meet certain nutritional requirements could affect the demand for crop nutrients and crop protection products, as well as the demand for fuel to operate application equipment.
We operate some of our business through joint ventures in which our rights to control business decisions are limited. Several parts of our business, including in particular our agronomy business segment and portions of our grain marketing, wheat milling and foods businesses, are operated through joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties. Operating a business through a joint venture means that we have less control over business decisions than we have in our wholly owned businesses. In particular, we generally cannot act on major business initiatives in our joint ventures without the consent of the other party or parties in that venture.