As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 15, 2004
Registration No. 333-          



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


American Reprographics Company

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


         
Delaware
  7334   20-1700361
(State or other jurisdiction of   (Primary Standard Industrial   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Classification Code Number)   Identification Number)

700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550

Glendale, California 91203
(818) 500-0225
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)


Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan

Chief Executive Officer
American Reprographics Company
700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550
Glendale, California 91203
(818) 500-0225
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
         
Teresa V. Pahl
  Brett E. Cooper   Frank H. Golay, Jr.
Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus,
  Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP   Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Vlahos & Rudy, LLP
  The Orrick Building   1888 Century Park East
333 Market Street, Suite 2100
  405 Howard Street   Los Angeles, California 90067
San Francisco, California 94105
  San Francisco, California 94105   (310) 712-6600
(415) 777-3200
  (415) 773-5700    

       Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

      If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box.     o

      If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     o

      If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     o

      If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     o

      If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.     o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

         


Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate Amount of
Title of Each Class of Offering Registration
Securities to be Registered Price(1)(2) Fee

Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
  $230,000,000   $29,141


(1)  Includes shares to be sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.
 
(2)  Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

       The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.




 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion. Dated October 15, 2004.

               Shares

(ARC LOGO)

Common Stock


       This is an initial public offering of shares of common stock of American Reprographics Company (“ARC”).

       ARC is offering                     of the shares to be sold in the offering. The selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are offering an additional          shares. ARC will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by the selling stockholders.

       Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the common stock. It is currently estimated that the initial public offering price will be between $          and $          per share. ARC intends to list the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARP”.

       See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 13 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of the common stock.


       Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


                 
Per Share Total


Initial public offering price
  $       $    
Underwriting discount
  $       $    
Proceeds, before expenses, to ARC
  $       $    
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders
  $       $    

       To the extent the underwriters sell more than            shares of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional            shares of common stock from the selling stockholders at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discount.


       The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York on                     .

 
Goldman, Sachs & Co. JPMorgan
Credit Suisse First Boston
Robert W. Baird & Co. CIBC World Markets


Prospectus dated                     .


 

TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES

       We own or have rights to trademarks, service marks, copyrights and trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business, including the names “American Reprographics Company SM ,” “ARC SM ,” “Abacus PCR TM ,” “BidCaster SM ,” “EWO SM ,” “MetaPrint TM ,” “OneView SM ,” “PEiR SM ,” “PlanWell®,” “PlanWell PDS TM ,” “PlanWell Enterprise SM ,” and various design marks associated therewith. This prospectus also includes trademarks, service marks and trade names of other companies.

MARKET DATA

       We operate in an industry in which it is difficult to obtain precise industry and market information. Although we have obtained some industry data from third party sources that we believe to be reliable, in many cases we have based certain statements contained in this prospectus regarding our industry and our position in the industry on estimates concerning our customers and competitors. These estimates are based on our experience in the industry, conversations with our principal vendors, our own investigation of market conditions and information obtained through our numerous acquisitions. We cannot assure you as to the accuracy of any such estimates, and such estimates may not be indicative of our position in our industry.

i


 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

       This summary highlights only selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including “Risk Factors,” “Forward-Looking Statements,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on page F-1, before investing in our common stock. In this prospectus, unless the context indicates otherwise, “we,” “us,” “our,” “American Reprographics,” “ARC,” “our company,” and similar terms refer to American Reprographics Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Our Company

       We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. We also provide these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality, that also require sophisticated document management services. The business-to-business services we provide to our customers include document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand. We provide our core services through industry leading technology and innovation, a sophisticated network of 173 locally branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs at our customers’ locations. We also sell reprographics equipment and supplies to complement our full range of service offerings. In further support of our core services, we license our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship internet-based application, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. We also operate PEiR (Profit and Education in Reprographics) through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers, while promoting our reprographics technology as the industry standard. Our services are critical to our customers because they shorten their document processing and distribution time, improve the quality of their document information management, and provide a secure, controlled document management environment.

       We operate 173 reprographics service centers, including 170 service centers in 133 cities in 29 states throughout the United States and three reprographics service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. Our reprographics service centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. These service centers are arranged in a hub and satellite structure and are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide our services both locally and nationally. We service more than 65,000 active customers and employ over 3,450 people, including a sales force of approximately 270 employees.

       In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We believe that our extensive national footprint, our industry leading technology, and our comprehensive offering of value-added services, including logistics and facilities management, provide us with a distinct competitive advantage.

       For the year ended December 31, 2003, our net sales were $416.0 million, our income from operations was $62.5 million, our adjusted EBITDA (adjusted to exclude a one-time charge of $14.9 million related to the early extinguishment of debt) was $81.9 million, and our net income was $4.9 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, our net sales were $226.1 million, our income from operations was $40.0 million, our EBITDA was $49.2 million, and our net income was $19.2 million. Based on our year to date net sales, we believe that the AEC market accounted for approximately 80% of our net sales, with the remaining 20% consisting of sales to non-AEC markets. During the five years ended December 31, 2003, we grew our net sales at a compounded annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 24.3% and maintained an adjusted EBITDA margin in excess of

1


 

19.1%. See footnotes 2, 3 and 4 in “— Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for the definition of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA.

       We have continued to expand our geographic coverage and market share by entering complementary markets through strategic acquisitions of high quality companies with well-recognized local brand names and, in most cases, more than 25 years of operating history. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 companies and have retained approximately 93% of the management of the acquired companies. As part of our growth strategy, we have recently begun opening and operating branch service centers, which we view as a low cost, rapid form of market expansion. Our branch openings require modest capital expenditures and are expected to generate operating profit within 12 months from opening. We have opened 15 new branches in key markets since September 2003 and expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005.

Industry Overview

       The reprographics industry has traditionally provided services related to the reproduction and distribution of large format architectural, engineering and construction documents. Customer demands for speed and efficiency and advances in technology have transformed the reprographics industry such that reprographers are now expected to offer complex digital document management capabilities, document distribution expertise, comprehensive logistics, and the ability to provide document services under intense deadlines. These sophisticated services typically are charged as part of a per square foot printing cost.

       According to the International Reprographics Association, or IRgA, the reprographics industry in the United States is estimated to be $5 billion in size. The IRgA indicates that the reprographics industry is highly fragmented, consisting of approximately 3,000 firms with average annual sales of approximately $1.5 million and 20 to 25 employees. Since construction documents are the primary medium of communication for the AEC industry, demand for reprographics services in the AEC market is closely tied to the level of activity in the construction industry, which in turn is driven by macroeconomic trends such as GDP growth, interest rates, job creation, office vacancy rates, and tax revenues. According to FMI Corporation, or FMI, a consulting firm to the construction industry, construction industry spending in the United States for 2004 is estimated at $975 billion, with expenditures divided between residential construction (55%) and commercial and public, or non-residential, construction (45%). The $5 billion reprographics industry is approximately 0.5% of the $975 billion construction industry in the United States. Our AEC revenues are most closely correlated to the non-residential sectors of the construction industry which sectors are the largest users of reprographics services. According to FMI, the non-residential sectors of the construction industry are projected to grow at an average of 5.4% per year over the next three years.

       Non-residential construction projects are generally large in scale, time consuming, and subject to cost overruns and delays. A frequent cause of such problems is the complexity of the construction documentation and the logistics involved in distributing documents to their intended recipients. Reprographers can facilitate better document management through technology applications. For example, reprographers can provide more efficient document distribution by shifting from an analog “print and distribute” business model, where customer orders are placed and produced in one location and physically distributed locally or nationally, to a digital “distribute and print” model, where customer orders are placed in one location, distributed digitally and physically produced at one or more local service centers.

       Market opportunities for business-to-business document management services such as ours are rapidly expanding into non-AEC industries. For example, non-AEC customers are increasingly using large and small format color imaging for point-of-purchase displays, digital publishing, presentation materials, educational materials and marketing materials as these services have become more efficient and available on a short-run, on-demand basis through digital technology. As a result, we believe that our addressable market is substantially larger than the core AEC

2


 

reprographics market. We believe that the growth of non-AEC industries is generally tied to growth in the U.S. gross domestic product, or GDP, which is projected to grow 4.3% in 2004 and 3.6% in 2005 according to Wall Street’s consensus estimates.

       The development of digital technology and internet-based solutions for managing documents and the corresponding distribution and reproduction processes have created the opportunity for reprographics companies such as ourselves to offer complementary, value-added services to AEC and non-AEC customers through intelligent technological solutions and an extensive physical network.

Our Services

       We provide business-to-business services to our customers in three key areas: document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand. These services include:

•  PlanWell, our proprietary, internet-based planroom launched in June 2000, and our suite of other reprographics software products that enable the online purchase and fulfillment of reprographics services. From PlanWell’s inception in June 2000 through September 1, 2004, more than 650,000 orders have been placed through PlanWell online planrooms for the management of more than 54,000 projects and over seven million complex, large format documents.
 
•  Production services, including print-on-demand, document assembly, document finishing, mounting, laminating, binding, and kitting, provided through our national footprint of service centers, all of which are connected through a sophisticated digital network.
 
•  Logistics, including pick up, delivery, and shipping of time-sensitive, critical documents. These services are supported by a fleet of approximately 675 vehicles and nearly 700 employees. Contracted courier services allow our divisions to manage additional delivery capacity through approximately 157 vehicles and drivers.
 
•  Highly customized large and small format reprographics in color and black and white. These customizable services, made possible by advances in digital production equipment and software, have allowed us to expand our service offerings to both our traditional AEC customer base, as well as pursue new, recurring business in the non-AEC market.
 
•  Facilities management, including recurring on-site document management services, staffing, and management and procurement of related on-site equipment and supplies at our customers’ locations through our more than 1,560 facilities management programs.
 
•  Sales of reprographics equipment and supplies to end-users in the AEC industry to further complement our full range of service offerings and further increase our purchasing power.
 
•  Other document management and reprographics software, including Abacus PCR (Print Cost Recovery System), BidCaster, EWO (Electronic Work Order), MetaPrint and OneView, among others, that support ordering, tracking, job costing, and other customer specific accounting information for a variety of projects and services.

       To further support and promote our core services ( document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand ), we also:

•  License our suite of reprographics technology products, including PlanWell, to independent reprographers to promote our technology as the digital standard for the fulfillment of reprographics services in the AEC industry and enhance our leading position in AEC document management. Through September 1, 2004, we have licensed PlanWell and our other technology products to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities throughout the United States.
 
•  Operate PEiR, a trade organization wholly owned by us, through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers. PEiR members, currently consisting of 43 independent reprographers, are required to license PlanWell

3


 

and may purchase equipment and supplies at a lower cost than they could obtain independently. In turn, their purchasing volumes increase our buying power and influence with vendors.

Our Competitive Strengths

       We believe that we maintain the following competitive strengths:

•  Leading Market Position in Fragmented Industry. In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We are the largest reprographer in most of the geographic markets we serve, as the majority of the approximately 3,000 firms in the reprographics industry are small and locally focused. Our size and national footprint provide us with significant purchasing power, economies of scale, the ability to invest in industry leading technologies, and the resources to service large, national customers.
 
•  Leader in Technology and Innovation. We strive to maintain the leading position in our industry by creating innovative, value-added technology solutions for our customers and other independent reprographers. We believe PlanWell is well positioned to become the industry standard within the AEC industry. In addition, we have developed other proprietary software applications that complement PlanWell and have enabled us to improve the efficiency of our services, add complementary services and increase our revenue.
 
•  Extensive National Footprint with Regional Expertise. Our national network of service centers maintains local customer relationships while benefiting from our centralized corporate functions and national scale. Each service center provides sophisticated, personalized services that are tailored to meet the regional needs of our customers. Our service facilities are organized as hub and satellite structures within individual markets, allowing us to balance production capacity and minimize capital expenditures through technology sharing among our service centers within each market. The majority of our customers are no more than five miles from one of our service centers. We also leverage the geographic coverage of our production facilities to address the service needs of large companies that operate in multiple locations. Our Premier Accounts business unit offers regional and national customers our services under a single contract, while offering centralized access to project specific services, billing, and tracking information.
 
•  Flexible Operating Model. We are able to tailor our operations to meet the demands of the local markets that we serve by promoting regional decision making for marketing, pricing, and selling practices. In this manner, we remain responsive to our customers while benefiting from the cost structure advantages of our centralized administrative functions. Our flexible operating model also allows us to capitalize on an improving business environment. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2003, we achieved an operating margin (income from operations divided by net sales) of 15.0% and an EBITDA margin (exclusive of a one-time charge related to the early extinguishment of debt) of 19.7%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we experienced revenue growth of 5.6% compared to the same period in 2003 and achieved an operating margin of 17.7% and an EBITDA margin of 21.8%, resulting in margin improvement of approximately 2.7 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, demonstrating the leverage in our operating model in an expanding business environment.
 
•  Consistent, Strong Free Cash Flow. Through management of our inventory and receivables and our low capital expenditure requirements, we have consistently generated strong free cash flow (defined as operating cash flow less cash capital expenditures) regardless of recent industry and economic conditions. Our historical capital expenditures have been relatively low, with overall capital spending averaging approximately 1.5% of annual net sales over the last three years. In 2003, we generated free cash flow of $43.2 million. From the beginning of 2001 to the end of June 2004, we generated a cumulative $164.0 million of free cash flow.

4


 

•  Low Cost Operator. We believe we are one of the lowest cost operators in the reprographics industry, which we have accomplished by minimizing branch level expenses and capitalizing on our significant scale for purchasing efficiencies. As a result of our national presence and size, we enjoy significant economies of scale, and receive favorable terms from major vendors of equipment, software and reprographics supplies such as Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company, CDW Corporation, and Dell Inc. We also offer savings to other reprographers through our PEiR division, which allows members to purchase machinery and supplies at lower prices than they could obtain independently while further increasing our purchasing power.
 
•  Experienced Management Team and Highly Trained Workforce. Our senior management team of S. “Mohan” Chandramohan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, K. “Suri” Suriyakumar, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Mark Legg, Chief Financial Officer, together with our divisional managers, has an average of over 20 years of industry experience. Mr. Chandramohan has been with us since February 1988 and Mr. Suriyakumar has been with us since November 1989. We have also successfully retained approximately 93% of the managers of the 80 businesses we have acquired since 1997.

Our Business Strategy

       Our objective is to continue to strengthen our competitive position as the preferred provider of business-to-business document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services . We seek to strengthen this position while increasing revenue, cash flow, profitability, and market share. Our key strategies to accomplish these objectives include:

•  Continue to Increase Our Market Penetration and Expand Our Nationwide Footprint. Through our technical and operational expertise and strong customer relationships, we expect to continue to penetrate key markets and build our nationwide presence. We intend to increase our existing presence in key U.S. markets while expanding into under-penetrated regions through our facilities management contracts, targeted branch openings, strategic acquisitions, and national accounts.

  Õ   Facilities Management Contracts. We expect to capitalize on the continued trend of our customers to outsource their document management services, including their in-house operations. Since January 1, 2001, the number of our facilities management contracts has more than doubled. Based on the six months ended June 30, 2004, annualized net sales from these contracts have grown to $69.0 million. We will continue to concentrate on developing ongoing facilities management relationships in all of the markets we serve and building our base of recurring revenue.
 
  Õ   Targeted Branch Openings. Significant opportunities exist to expand our geographic coverage, capture new customers and increase our market share by opening additional satellite branches in regions near our established operations. Our strategy with respect to branch openings is in the early stages of implementation, having evolved as the next stage of our growth to complement our traditional acquisition strategy. Since September 2003, we have opened 15 new branches in areas that expand or further penetrate our existing markets and expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005. Capital investment for a new branch is modest and these new branches are expected to generate positive operating profit within 12 months from opening.
 
  Õ   Strategic Acquisitions. Acquisitions have historically been an important component of our growth strategy. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 reprographics companies. We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our business further through disciplined, strategic acquisitions due to the fragmented nature of our industry. Because our industry consists primarily of small, privately-held companies that serve only local markets, we believe that we

5


 

  can continue to grow our business by successfully acquiring additional reprographics companies at reasonable prices, and realizing substantial operating and purchasing synergies by leveraging our existing corporate infrastructure.
 
  Õ   National Accounts. Our Premier Accounts business unit offers a comprehensive suite of reprographics services designed to meet the demands of large regional and national businesses. It provides local reprographics services to national companies through our national network of reprographics service centers, while offering centralized access to project-specific services, billing and tracking information. For example, we recently entered into an exclusive Premier Accounts contract with one of the leading construction companies in the United States under which we offer a full range of document management, distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services on a national scale. This contract requires that the customer use PlanWell for every project, and the use of PlanWell by this customer’s contractors, subcontractors and outside work force should significantly improve the potential for revenue growth from this account. We believe that we will continue to capture additional revenues and national customers through this business unit.

•  Promote PlanWell as the Industry Standard for Procuring Reprographics Services Online. Our goal is to continue to expand market penetration of PlanWell and create a standardized, internet-based portal to manage, store, and retrieve documents. In order to increase market share and achieve industry standardization, we will continue to license our PlanWell technology to other reprographics companies, including members of PEiR. Through September 1, 2004, PlanWell and our other technology products have been licensed to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities throughout the United States. These efforts, combined with the strong functionality and growing capabilities of the PlanWell suite of products, should continue to position us at the forefront of technological innovation within the AEC and non-AEC reprographics markets, and create additional service and licensing revenue for us.
 
•  Expand Our Non-AEC and Ancillary Product and Service Offerings. We have leveraged advances in digital production equipment and our expertise in providing highly customized, quick-turn services to the AEC industry to actively pursue customers from non-AEC industries that seek sophisticated document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We have been successful in attracting non-AEC customers that require services such as the production of large format and small format color and black and white documents, educational and training materials, short-run publishing products, and retail and promotional items. We began targeting non-AEC customers upon our conversion to digital technology in 1997 and we believe that our services to these customers accounted for approximately 20% of our year to date net sales.

In addition to expanding our non-AEC revenues, we continue to focus on creating new value-added services beyond traditional reprographics to offer all of our customers. We are actively engaged in services such as bid facilitation, print network management for offices and on-site production facilities, and on-demand color publishing. We plan to continue to capitalize on our technological innovation to enhance our existing services and to create new reprographics technologies.

Corporate Background and Reorganization

       Our predecessor, Ford Graphics, was founded in Los Angeles, California in 1960. In 1967, this sole proprietorship was dissolved and a new corporate structure was established under the name Micro Device, Inc., which continued to provide reprographics services under the name Ford Graphics. In 1989, our current senior management team purchased Micro Device, Inc., and in November 1997 our company was recapitalized as a California limited liability company, with management retaining a 50% ownership position and the remainder owned by outside investors. In February 2000, Code Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., a private equity fund formed by Code

6


 

Hennessy & Simmons L.L.C., acquired a 50% stake in our company from these outside investors in a subsequent recapitalization transaction (referred to as the “2000 recapitalization”).

       We are currently organized as American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Holdings. We conduct our operations through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American Reprographics Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Opco, and its subsidiaries.

       Immediately prior to the closing of this offering, we will reorganize from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics Company. In the reorganization, the members of Holdings will exchange their common units and options to purchase common units for shares of our common stock and options to purchase shares of our common stock. As required by the operating agreement of Holdings, we will repurchase all of the preferred equity of Holdings upon the closing of this offering with a portion of the net proceeds from this offering.

       Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus gives effect to our reorganization. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus are the financial statements of Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries.

       Our principal executive offices are located at 700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550, Glendale, California 91203 and our telephone number at that address is (818) 500-0225. Our website address is www.e-arc.com. The information found on our website, however, is not a part of this prospectus.

Risk Factors

       You should carefully consider all of the information in this prospectus. In particular, for a discussion of some specific factors that you should consider in evaluating an investment in our common stock, see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 13.

7


 

The Offering

 
Common stock offered by us                      shares
 
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders                      shares
 
Total common stock offered                      shares
 
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering                      shares
 
Use of proceeds We expect to use approximately $26.8 million of the net proceeds from this offering to repurchase our preferred equity; approximately $49.9 million to repay a portion of our senior second priority secured term loan facility; and the balance of approximately $27.8 million to repay a portion of our senior first priority secured term loan facility. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
 
Dividend policy We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
 
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol “ARP”

Unless otherwise noted, the information in this prospectus, including the information above:

•  assumes our conversion from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, which will occur before the closing of this offering;
 
•  assumes 35,487,511 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2004;
 
•  excludes                      shares of common stock subject to outstanding options at June 30, 2004 issued at a weighted average exercise price of $5.18 per share;
 
•  excludes                      shares of common stock issued upon option exercises since June 30, 2004;
 
•  excludes                      shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options granted under our Unit Plan since June 30, 2004;
 
•  excludes 5,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2005 Stock Plan, and 750,000 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
 
•  excludes 1,168,842 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants at June 30, 2004 issued at an exercise price of $4.61 per share; and
 
•  assumes no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares.

8


 

Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data

       The summary historical and unaudited pro forma financial data presented below are derived from the audited financial statements of Holdings for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, and the unaudited financial statements of Holdings for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004. The summary historical financial data for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 are derived from unaudited interim financial statements which, in the opinion of management, include all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to state fairly the data included therein in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial information, except for pro forma data. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma financial data set forth below give effect to our conversion to a Delaware corporation and the completion of this offering, as described in “Use of Proceeds.” The unaudited pro forma financial data are not necessarily indicative of our financial position or results of operations that might have occurred had the transactions they give effect to been completed as of the dates indicated and do not purport to represent what our financial position or results of operations might be for any future period or date. For additional information see “Capitalization,” “Selected Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our audited financial statements and unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                                         
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
                                                       
Net sales
  $ 223,836     $ 351,099     $ 420,701     $ 418,924     $ 415,960     $ 214,154     $ 226,133  
Cost of sales
    134,531       201,390       243,710       247,778       252,028       127,311       130,790  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    89,305       149,709       176,991       171,146       163,932       86,843       95,343  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    53,730       83,139       102,576       101,805       101,252       51,044       55,264  
Amortization of intangibles
    2,823       3,966       5,731       218       131       67       54  
Costs incurred in connection with the 2000 recapitalization
          20,544                                
Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities
          6,232       1,428       1,500                    
Write-off of intangible assets
                3,438                          
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from operations
    32,752       35,828       63,818       67,623       62,549       35,732       40,025  
Other income
    638       713       304       541       1,024       731       567  
Interest expense, net
    (9,215 )     (29,238 )     (47,530 )     (39,917 )     (39,390 )     (18,116 )     (16,248 )
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          (1,195 )                 (14,921 )            
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income before income tax provision
    24,175       6,108       16,592       28,247       9,262       18,347       24,344  
Income tax provision
    4,068       4,784       5,802       6,304       4,321       3,641       5,174  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income
    20,107       1,324       10,790       21,943       4,941       14,706       19,170  
Dividends and amortization of discount on preferred members’ equity
          (2,158 )     (3,107 )     (3,291 )     (1,730 )     (1,730 )      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common members
    20,107       (834 )     7,683       18,652       3,211       12,976       19,170  
Unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision(1)
    5,304       2,618       2,622       6,275       1,407       4,305       5,937  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common members
  $ 14,803     $ (3,452 )   $ 5,061     $ 12,377     $ 1,804     $ 8,671     $ 13,233  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

9


 

                                                           
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common members per common unit:
                                                       
 
Basic
  $ 0.60     $ (0.10 )   $ 0.14     $ 0.34     $ 0.05     $ 0.24     $ 0.37  
 
Diluted
  $ 0.60     $ (0.10 )   $ 0.14     $ 0.34     $ 0.05     $ 0.24     $ 0.35  
Weighted average units:
                                                       
 
Basic
    24,571       35,308       36,629       36,406       35,480       35,473       35,488  
 
Diluted
    24,571       35,371       36,758       36,723       37,298       35,999       37,440  
                                                         
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Other Financial Data:
                                                       
EBIT(2)(3)
  $ 33,390     $ 35,346     $ 64,122     $ 68,164     $ 48,652     $ 36,463     $ 40,592  
EBITDA(2)(3)
  $ 42,932     $ 50,288     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 67,011     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
Adjusted EBITDA(4)
  $ 42,932     $ 72,027     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 81,932     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
Adjusted EBIT margin(5)
    14.9 %     16.3 %     15.2 %     16.3 %     15.3 %     17.0 %     18.0 %
Adjusted EBITDA margin(6)
    19.2 %     20.5 %     21.3 %     20.5 %     19.7 %     21.4 %     21.8 %
Depreciation and amortization(7)
  $ 9,542     $ 14,942     $ 25,372     $ 17,898     $ 18,359     $ 9,415     $ 8,623  
Capital expenditures, net
  $ 3,877     $ 5,228     $ 8,659     $ 5,209     $ 4,992     $ 1,817     $ 3,427  
Interest expense
  $ 9,215     $ 29,238     $ 47,530     $ 39,917     $ 39,390     $ 18,116     $ 16,248  
                                                         
As of June 30, 2004,

Pro
As of December 31, Forma

As
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Actual Adjusted(8)







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
                                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 15,814     $ 31,565     $ 29,110     $ 24,995     $ 17,315     $ 16,809     $ 6,307  
Total assets
  $ 204,464     $ 358,026     $ 371,948     $ 395,677     $ 376,843     $ 389,133     $ 376,916  
Long-term obligations and mandatorily redeemable preferred and common membership units(9)(10)
  $ 123,951     $ 359,746     $ 371,515     $ 378,102     $ 360,008     $ 360,137     $ 256,053  
Total members’ equity (deficit)(11)
  $ 32,422     $ (80,478 )   $ (78,900 )   $ (59,784 )   $ (57,329 )   $ (40,079 )   $ 68,264  
Working capital
  $ 15,379     $ 34,742     $ 24,338     $ 24,371     $ 16,809     $ 32,870     $ 22,368  


  (1)  Until our reorganization, which will be effective prior to the closing of this offering, a substantial portion of our business will continue to operate as a limited liability company, or LLC, and taxed as a partnership. As a result, the members of the LLC pay the income taxes on the earnings. The unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision amounts reflected in the table above were calculated as if our reorganization became effective on January 1, 1999.
 
  (2)  EBIT is a non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest expense and income taxes. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. We believe that EBIT and EBITDA are, and will continue to be, financial measures useful to financial analysts and to the lending community because they are generally used in analyzing the operating performance of a company and its ability to service debt and otherwise meet its cash needs. EBIT and EBITDA, however, are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity. Since EBIT and EBITDA are not measures determined in accordance with GAAP and, thus, are susceptible to

10


 

varying interpretations and calculations, EBIT and EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Neither EBIT nor EBITDA represents an amount of funds that is available for management’s discretionary use.
 
  (3)  The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA, and pro forma net income:

                                                           
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 28,569     $ 28,054     $ 53,151     $ 56,413     $ 48,237     $ 26,922     $ 28,515  
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
    242       (95 )     (533 )     (5,482 )     (4,860 )     1,503       1,247  
 
Noncash expenses, including depreciation and amortization
    (8,704 )     (26,635 )     (41,828 )     (28,988 )     (38,436 )     (13,719 )     (10,592 )
 
Income tax provision
    4,068       4,784       5,802       6,304       4,321       3,641       5,174  
 
Interest expense, net
    9,215       29,238       47,530       39,917       39,390       18,116       16,248  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBIT
    33,390       35,346       64,122       68,164       48,652       36,463       40,592  
 
Depreciation and amortization(7)
    9,542       14,942       25,372       17,898       18,359       9,415       8,623  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBITDA
    42,932       50,288       89,494       86,062       67,011       45,878       49,215  
 
Interest expense
    (9,215 )     (29,238 )     (47,530 )     (39,917 )     (39,390 )     (18,116 )     (16,248 )
 
Income tax provision and unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision(1)
    (9,372 )     (7,402 )     (8,424 )     (12,579 )     (5,728 )     (7,946 )     (11,111 )
 
Depreciation and amortization
    (9,542 )     (14,942 )     (25,372 )     (17,898 )     (18,359 )     (9,415 )     (8,623 )
 
Dividends and amortization of discount on preferred members’ equity
          (2,158 )     (3,107 )     (3,291 )     (1,730 )     (1,730 )      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common members
  $ 14,803     $ (3,452 )   $ 5,061     $ 12,377     $ 1,804     $ 8,671     $ 13,233  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

  (4)  Adjusted EBITDA refers to our EBITDA, adjusted to exclude the impact of (i) costs incurred in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and (ii) loss on early extinguishment of debt. We believe that adjustment for these items is recognized by the industry in which we operate to be relevant as a supplementary non-GAAP financial measure widely used by financial analysts and others in our industry to meaningfully evaluate a company’s operating performance and ability to comply with its applicable debt covenants. We also use adjusted EBITDA to measure and pay certain annual management bonuses. In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future, we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

  The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to adjusted EBITDA:

                                                           
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
EBITDA
  $ 42,932     $ 50,288     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 67,011     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
 
Costs incurred in connection with the 2000 recapitalization
          20,544                                
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          1,195                   14,921              
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 42,932     $ 72,027     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 81,932     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

  (5)  The adjusted EBIT margin is calculated by subtracting depreciation and amortization from adjusted EBITDA and dividing the result by net sales.
 
  (6)  The adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing adjusted EBITDA by net sales.

11


 

  (7)  Depreciation and amortization includes a write-off of intangible assets of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
  (8)  Prepared on the same basis as the capitalization table. See “Capitalization.”
 
  (9)  In July 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” In accordance with SFAS No. 150, the redeemable preferred equity of Holdings has been reclassified in our financial statements as a component of our total debt upon our adoption of this new standard. The redeemable preferred equity amounted to $25.8 million as of December 31, 2003 and $26.8 million as of June 30, 2004. SFAS No. 150 does not permit the restatement of financial statements for periods prior to the adoption of this standard.

(10)  Redeemable common membership units amounted to $6.0 million and $8.1 million at December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
 
(11)  The decline in total members’ equity (deficit) from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000 was a result of an $88.8 million cash distribution to Holdings’ common unit holders in connection with the 2000 recapitalization and the reclassification of $20.3 million of preferred equity issued in connection with the 2000 recapitalization upon the adoption of SFAS No. 150 in July 2003.

12


 

RISK FACTORS

       Investing in our common stock involves a number of risks. You should carefully consider all of the information contained in this prospectus, including the risk factors set forth below, before investing in the common stock offered pursuant to this prospectus. We may encounter risks in addition to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also impair or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In such case, you may lose all or part of your original investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our business is sensitive to general economic conditions that could negatively impact our financial results.

       We believe that AEC markets accounted for approximately 80% of our year to date net sales. Our historical operating results reflect the cyclical and variable nature of the AEC industry. This industry historically experiences alternating periods of inadequate supplies of housing, commercial and industrial space coupled with low vacancies, causing a surge in construction activity and increased demand for reprographics services, followed by periods of oversupply and high vacancies and declining demand for reprographics services. In addition, existing and future government policies and programs may greatly influence the level of construction spending in the public sector, such as highways, schools, hospitals, sewers, and heavy construction. Since we derive a majority of our revenues from reprographics products and services provided to the AEC industry, our operating results are more sensitive to the nature of this industry than other companies who serve more diversified markets. Our experience has shown that the AEC industry generally experiences economic downturns six months after a downturn in the general economy. We expect that there may be a similar delay in the rebound of the AEC industry following a rebound in the general economy. Future economic and industry downturns may be characterized by diminished demand for our products and services and, therefore, any continued weakness in our customers’ markets and overall global economic conditions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

       In addition, because approximately 60% of our overall costs are fixed, changes in economic activity, positive or negative, affect our results of operations. As a result, our results of operations are subject to volatility and could deteriorate rapidly in an environment of declining revenues. Failure to maintain adequate cash reserves and effectively manage our costs could adversely affect our ability to offset our fixed costs and may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors may hinder our ability to execute our business strategy and maintain our profitability.

       The markets for our products and services are highly competitive, with competition primarily at a local and regional level. We compete primarily based on customer service, technological leadership, product performance and price. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to improve our service offerings, and develop and integrate technological advances. If we are unable to integrate technological advances into our service offerings to successfully meet the evolving needs of our customers in a timely manner, our operating results may be adversely affected. Technological innovation by our existing or future competitors could put us at a competitive disadvantage. In particular, our business could be adversely affected if any of our competitors develop or acquire superior technology that competes directly with or offers greater functionality than our technology, including PlanWell.

       We also face the possibility that competition will continue to increase, particularly if copy and printing or business services companies choose to expand into the reprographics services industry. Many of these companies are substantially larger and have significantly greater financial resources

13


 

than us, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, we could encounter competition in the future from large, well capitalized companies such as equipment dealers, system integrators, and other reprographics associations, that can produce their own technology and leverage their existing distribution channels. We could also encounter competition from non-traditional reprographics service providers that offer reprographics services as a component of the other services they provide to the AEC industry, such as vendors to our industry that provide services directly to our customers, bypassing reprographers. Any such future competition could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The reprographics industry has undergone vast changes in the last six years and will continue to evolve, and our failure to anticipate and adapt to future changes in our industry could harm our competitive position.

       In the past six years, the reprographics industry has undergone vast changes. The industry’s main production technology has migrated from analog to digital. This has prompted a number of trends in the reprographics industry, including a rapid shift toward decentralized production and lower labor utilization. As digital output devices become smaller, less expensive, easier to use and interconnected, end users of construction drawings are placing these devices within their offices and other locations. On-site reprographics equipment allows a customer to print documents and review hard copies without the delays or interruptions associated with sending documents out for duplication. Also, as a direct result of advancements in digital technology, labor demands have decreased. Instead of producing one print at a time, reprographers now have the capability to produce multiple sets of documents with a single production employee. By linking output devices through a single print server, a production employee simply directs output to the device that is best suited for the job. As a result of these trends, reprographers have had to modify their operations to decentralize printing and shift costs from labor to technology.

       Looking forward, we expect the reprographics industry to continue to evolve. Our industry will continue to embrace digital technology, not only in terms of production services, but also in terms of network technology, digital document storage and management, and information distribution, all of which will require investment in, and continued development of, technological innovation. If we fail to keep pace with current changes or fail to anticipate or adapt to future changes in our industry, our competitive position could be harmed.

We cannot be certain that our service innovations will continue.

       In order to remain competitive, we must continually invest in new technologies that will enable us to meet the evolving demands of our customers. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in the introduction and marketing of any new services, or that we will develop and introduce in a timely manner innovative services that satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop new services and introduce them successfully could harm our ability to grow our business and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

       In addition, as reprographics technologies continue to be developed, one or more of our current service offerings may become obsolete. In particular, digital technologies may significantly reduce the need for high volume printing. Digital technology may also make traditional reprographics equipment smaller and cheaper, which may cause larger AEC customers to discontinue outsourcing their reprographics needs. Any such developments could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

14


 

If we are unable to charge for our value-added services to offset potential declines in print volumes, our long term revenue could be adversely affected.

       Our customers value the ability to view and order prints via the internet and print to output devices in their own offices and other locations throughout the country. This trend toward consuming information on an “as needed” basis could result in decreasing printing volumes and declining revenues in the longer term. Failure to offset these potential declines in printing volumes by changing how we charge for our services and developing additional revenue sources could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We derive a significant percentage of net sales from within the State of California.

       We derived approximately half of our net sales in 2003, and in the six months ended June 30, 2004, from our operations in California. As a result, we are dependent to a large extent upon the AEC industry in California and, accordingly, are sensitive to economic factors affecting California, including general and local economic conditions, macroeconomic trends, and natural disasters. Any adverse developments affecting California could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our growth strategy depends in part on our ability to successfully identify and manage our acquisitions and branch openings. Failure to do so could impede our future growth and adversely affect our competitive position.

       As part of our growth strategy, we intend to prudently pursue strategic acquisitions within the reprographics industry. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 businesses, most of which were long established in the communities in which they conduct their business. Our efforts to execute our acquisition strategy may be affected by our ability to continue to identify, negotiate, integrate, and close acquisitions. In addition, any governmental review or investigation of our proposed acquisitions, such as by the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, may impede, limit or prevent us from proceeding with an acquisition. For example, our acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics in 2001 triggered an investigation by the FTC, which has since been concluded without any action being taken against us by the FTC. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions, although we currently have no agreements or active negotiations with respect to any material acquisitions.

       Acquisitions involve a number of special risks. There may be difficulties integrating acquired personnel and distinct business cultures. Additional financing may be necessary and, if available, could increase our leverage, dilute our equity, or both. Acquisitions may divert management’s time and our resources from existing operations. It is possible that there could be a negative effect on our financial statements from the impairment related to goodwill and other intangibles. We may experience the loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies. In addition, risks may include high transaction costs and expenses of integrating acquired companies, as well as exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies and failure of the acquired business to achieve expected results. These risks could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

       In addition, we have recently begun to expand our geographic coverage by opening additional satellite branches in regions near our established operations to capture new customers and greater market share. Since September 2003, we have opened 15 new branches in areas that expand or further penetrate our existing markets, and we expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005. Although the capital investment for a new branch is modest, our growth strategy with respect to branch openings is in the early stages of implementation and the branches we open in the future may not ultimately produce returns that justify our investment.

15


 

We operate under a dual operating structure which, if not successfully managed, could harm our business and profitability.

       We operate our company under a dual operating structure of centralized administrative functions and regional decision making on marketing, pricing, and selling practices. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 businesses and, in most cases, have delegated the responsibility for marketing, pricing, and selling practices with the local and operational managers of these businesses. If we do not successfully manage our subsidiaries under this decentralized operating structure, we risk having disparate results, lost market opportunities, lack of economic synergies, and a loss of vision and planning, all of which could harm our business and profitability.

       In August 2003, we restated our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 to correct accounting misstatements at one of our subsidiaries during 2001 due to fraud by certain managers at the subsidiary. The accounting misstatements at the subsidiary resulted in the overstatement of net income in 2001 by $1,461,000. In response to these accounting misstatements, we have strengthened our financial and management policies and procedures, established an internal audit group, and improved our accounting controls. However, we cannot assure that these new internal controls will be effective in preventing similar fraud in the future.

We depend on certain key vendors, and adverse developments concerning these vendors, or our relationships with these vendors, could adversely affect our business.

       We purchase reprographics equipment and maintenance services, as well as paper, toner and other supplies, from a limited number of vendors. Our four largest vendors, which supplied a substantial amount of our reprographics equipment, maintenance services, and production supplies in 2003, are Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., and Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company. Adverse developments concerning key vendors or our relationships with them could force us to seek alternate sources for our reprographics equipment, maintenance services and supplies or to purchase such items on unfavorable terms. An alternative source of supply of reprographics equipment, maintenance services and supplies may not be readily available. A delay in procuring reprographics equipment, maintenance services or supplies, or an increase in the cost to purchase such reprographics equipment, maintenance services or supplies could limit our ability to provide services to our customers on a timely and cost-effective basis, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our failure to adequately protect the proprietary aspects of our technology, including PlanWell, may cause us to lose market share.

       Our success depends on our ability to protect and preserve the proprietary aspects of our technologies, including PlanWell. We rely on a combination of copyright and trademark protection, confidentiality agreements, non-compete agreements, reseller agreements, customer contracts, and technical measures to establish and protect our rights in our proprietary technologies. Under our PlanWell license agreements, we grant other reprographers a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited license to use our technology and receive our services. Our license agreements contain terms and conditions prohibiting the unauthorized reproduction or transfer of our products. These protections, however, may not be adequate to remedy harm we suffer due to misappropriation of our proprietary rights by third parties. In addition, U.S. law provides only limited protection of proprietary rights and the laws of some foreign countries may offer less protection than the laws of the United States. Unauthorized third parties may copy aspects of our products, reverse engineer our products or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Others may develop non-infringing technologies that are similar or superior to ours. If competitors are able to develop such technology and we cannot successfully enforce our rights against them, they may be able to market and sell or license the marketing and sale of products that compete with ours, and this competition could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, intellectual

16


 

property litigation can be expensive, a burden on management’s time and our company’s resources, and its results can be uncertain.

Our intellectual property rights may be subject to the rights of third parties.

       Other companies or individuals may pursue litigation against us with respect to intellectual property-based claims, including claims relating to the use of our brands, trademarks, logos, technologies, trade secrets, and other proprietary information. In the event of an adverse result in any litigation with respect to intellectual property rights relevant to our business that could arise in the future, we could be required to obtain licenses to the infringing technology; begin using other brands, trademarks and logos; pay substantial damages under applicable law; or expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology. There can be no assurance that suitable replacement technologies would be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. Our insurance may not cover potential claims or may not be adequate to indemnify us for damages we incur. Also, litigation frequently involves substantial expenditures and can require significant management attention, even if we ultimately prevail.

Damage or disruption to our facilities, our technology centers, our vendors or a majority of our customers may have a significant impact on our revenues, expenses and financial condition.

       We currently store most of our customer data at our two technology centers located in Northern California near known earthquake fault zones. Damage or destruction of one or both of these technology centers or a disruption of our data storage processes resulting from sustained process abnormalities, human error, acts of terrorism, violence, war or a natural disaster, such as fire, earthquake or flood, could have a material adverse effect on the markets in which we operate, our business operations, our expectations and other forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. In addition, such damage or destruction on a national scale resulting in a general economic downturn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We store and maintain critical customer data on computer servers at our technology centers that our customers access remotely through the internet and/or directly through telecommunications lines. If our back-up power generators fail during any power outage, if our telecommunications lines are severed or those lines on the internet are impaired for any reason, our remote access customers would be unable to access their critical data, causing an interruption in their operations. In such event, our remote access customers and their customers could seek to hold us responsible for any losses. We may also potentially lose these customers and our reputation could be harmed. In addition, such damage or destruction, particularly those that directly impact our technology centers or our vendors or customers could have an impact on our sales, supply chain, production capability, costs, and our ability to provide services to our customers.

       Although we currently maintain general property damage insurance, we do not maintain insurance for loss from earthquakes, acts of terrorism or war. If we incur losses from uninsured events, we could incur significant expenses which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

If we lose key personnel or qualified technical staff, our ability to manage the day-to-day aspects of our business will be adversely affected.

       We believe that the attraction and retention of qualified personnel is critical to our success. If we lose key personnel or are unable to recruit qualified personnel, our ability to manage the day-to-day aspects of our business will be adversely affected. Our operations and prospects depend in large part on the performance of our senior management team and the managers of our principal operating divisions. The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team, in particular, Mr. Chandramohan, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Suriyakumar, our President and Chief Operating Officer, could have a material adverse effect on our business,

17


 

financial condition and results of operations. Because our executive and divisional management team has on average more than 20 years of experience within the reprographics industry, it would be difficult to replace them.

If we are required to write down our goodwill, our operations and stockholders’ equity would be adversely affected.

       As described in the notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, we have $245 million of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2004. Goodwill arises when we pay more for a business than the fair market value of the acquired tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. Until January 1, 2002, we amortized this goodwill on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Under accounting rules that we adopted beginning January 1, 2002, we are no longer able to amortize goodwill on a yearly basis. Instead, we are required to periodically determine if our goodwill has become impaired, in which case we would be required to write off the impaired portion of goodwill. The amount of goodwill that we would write off in any given year is treated as a charge against earnings under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. If we are required to write off our goodwill, we could incur significant charges against earnings, which would adversely affect our results of operations and stockholders’ equity.

We have substantial debt and have the ability to incur additional debt. The principal and interest payment obligations of such debt may restrict our future operations and adversely affect our business.

       As of June 30, 2004, assuming that this offering and the application of the net proceeds from this offering as described under “Use of Proceeds” had been completed by that date, we would have had approximately $267 million of outstanding indebtedness. In addition, the credit agreements governing our credit facilities permit us to incur additional debt under certain circumstances.

       The incurrence of substantial amounts of debt may make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations; require us to dedicate a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal due under our debt, which will reduce funds available for other business purposes; increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; place us at a competitive disadvantage compared with some of our competitors that have less debt; and limit our ability to obtain additional financing required to fund working capital and capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.

       Our ability to satisfy our obligations and to reduce our total debt depends on our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow, and future financings may not be available to provide sufficient net proceeds to meet these obligations or to successfully execute our business strategy.

The agreements governing our credit facilities impose restrictions on our business.

       The credit agreements for our senior secured credit facilities contain, and other agreements we may enter into in the future may contain, covenants imposing significant restrictions on our business. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. These covenants place restrictions on our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt, create liens, make investments, enter into transactions with affiliates, sell assets, guarantee debt, declare or pay dividends, redeem common stock or make other distributions to stockholders, and consolidate or merge. See “Description of Certain Indebtedness.”

       Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial, and industry conditions. An event of default under our debt

18


 

agreements would permit some of our lenders to declare all amounts borrowed from them to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we were unable to repay debt to our senior lenders, these lenders could proceed against the collateral securing that debt.

Being a public company will increase our expenses and administrative workload.

       As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, our administrative staff will be required to perform additional tasks. For example, in anticipation of becoming a public company, we will have created or revised the roles and duties of our board committees, adopted additional internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, retained a transfer agent and a financial printer, adopted an insider trading policy and will have all of the internal and external costs of preparing and distributing periodic public reports in compliance with our obligations under the securities laws. We also expect that being a public company and these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers.

We will be exposed to risks relating to evaluations of controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

       Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. We will be evaluating our internal controls systems to allow management to report on, and our independent auditors to attest to, our internal controls. We will be performing the system and process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required to comply with the management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, we expect to incur substantial additional expenses and diversion of management’s time. While we anticipate being able to fully implement the requirements relating to internal controls and all other aspects of Section 404 by our December 31, 2005 deadline, we cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or the impact of the same on our operations since there is presently no precedent available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or the NYSE. Any such action could adversely affect our financial results or investors’ confidence in our company, and could cause our stock price to fall.

Our operations subject us to potential environmental liabilities.

       Our printing operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws, and regulations relating to the environment. Such environmental regulations may affect us by restricting the use of certain products or regulating their disposal and regulatory or legislative changes may cause future increases in our operating costs or otherwise affect our operations. Although we believe we are and have been in substantial compliance with such regulations, there is no assurance that in the future we may not be adversely affected by such regulations or incur increased operating costs in complying with such regulations.

       Our operations involve some use of hazardous substances and the generation of wastes, primarily toner, which could have adverse environmental impacts if released into the environment. Environmental regulations impose obligations on various entities to clean up contaminated properties or to pay for the cost of such remediation, often upon parties that did not actually cause the

19


 

contamination. Accordingly, we may become liable, either contractually or by operation of law, for remediation costs even if a contaminated property is not presently owned or operated by us, or if the contamination was caused by third parties during or prior to our ownership or operation of the property. While we are not subject to any existing remediation obligations, future events, such as changes in existing laws or policies or their enforcement, or the discovery of currently unknown contamination, may give rise to future remediation liabilities that may be material.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our stock price may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price.

       Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for shares of our common stock. An active public trading market for our common stock may not develop or, if it develops, may not be maintained after this offering, and the market price could fall below the initial public offering price. Factors such as quarterly variations in our financial results, announcements by us or others, developments affecting us, our customers and our suppliers, acquisition of products or businesses by us or our competitors, and general market volatility could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. As a result, you could lose all or part of your investment. Our company, the selling stockholders, and the representatives of the underwriters will negotiate to determine the initial public offering price. The initial public offering price may be higher than the trading price of our common stock following this offering.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware corporate law may make it difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our current board of directors and could deter an unsolicited third party acquisition offer, which may adversely affect the marketability and market price of our common stock.

       Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and in Delaware corporate law will make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors, which consequently will make it difficult to change the composition of management. In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management and board of directors. Public stockholders who might desire to participate in this type of transaction may not have an opportunity to do so. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public stockholders to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.

Our board of directors can issue preferred stock without stockholder approval of the terms of such stock.

       Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize our board of directors, without stockholder approval, to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the preferred stock, including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preference, sinking fund terms, subscription rights, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of a series. Our board of directors will be able to issue preferred stock with voting and conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock, without stockholder approval. At the completion of this offering, no shares of preferred stock will be outstanding and we have no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.

20


 

Shares available for sale and future stock sales could decrease the market price of our stock.

       Sales of shares of our common stock in the public market following this offering, or the perception that sales may occur, could depress the market price of our common stock. After this offering, we will have                      shares of common stock outstanding. The number of shares of common stock available for sale in the public market is temporarily limited by restrictions under federal securities law and under lock-up agreements that our directors, executive officers, the selling stockholders, and the holders of substantially all other shares of our common stock have entered into with the underwriters. Those lock-up agreements restrict these persons from disposing of or hedging their shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable for their shares until 180 days after the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. However, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. may release all or any portion of the shares from the restrictions of the lock-up agreements. All of the shares sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, except for any shares purchased by our affiliates (as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act). The remaining shares outstanding after this offering will be available for sale into the public market after the expiration of the initial 180-day lock-up period, except for any shares purchased by our affiliates (as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act). Additional shares of common stock underlying options will become available for sale in the public market. We expect to file a registration statement on Form S-8 that will register approximately 5.8 million shares of common stock, including shares of common stock issuable under our stock plans.

       As restrictions on resale end, our stock price could drop significantly if the holders of these restricted shares sell them or the market perceives they intend to sell them. These sales may also make it more difficult for us to sell securities in the future at a time and at a price we deem appropriate.

Because a limited number of stockholders control the majority of the voting power of our common stock, investors in this offering will not be able to determine the outcome of stockholder votes.

       Following this offering, our executive officers, directors, Code, Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., and their affiliated entities will control           % of the voting power of our common stock, or           % if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full. So long as these stockholders continue to hold, directly or indirectly, shares of common stock representing more than 50% of the voting power of our common stock, they will be able to direct the election of all of the members of our board of directors who will determine our strategic plans and financing decisions and appoint senior management. These stockholders will also be able to determine the outcome of substantially all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, including matters involving mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions resulting in a change in control of our company. These stockholders do not have any obligation to us to either retain or dispose of our common stock. They may seek to cause us to take courses of action that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment in us, but which might involve risks to other holders of our common stock or adversely affect us or other investors, including investors in this offering.

You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering.

       The initial public offering price will be substantially higher than the book value per share of our common stock. As a result, purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $ per share in the tangible book value of the common stock from the assumed initial public offering price of $                    . In addition, to the extent that currently outstanding options to purchase common stock at a price per share less than our tangible net book value per share are exercised, there will be further dilution.

21


 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

       This prospectus includes “forward-looking statements,” as defined by federal securities laws, with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business, and our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “could,” and similar expressions or phrases identify forward-looking statements.

       All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The occurrence of the events described, and the achievement of the expected results, depend on many events, some or all of which are not predictable or within our control. Actual results may differ materially from expected results.

       Factors that may cause actual results to differ from expected results include, among others:

•  general economic conditions and the level of construction activity;
 
•  competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors;
 
•  our failure to anticipate and adapt to future changes in our industry;
 
•  uncertainty regarding our product and service innovations;
 
•  the inability to charge for our value-added services to offset potential declines in print volumes;
 
•  adverse developments affecting the State of California, including general and local economic conditions, macroeconomic trends, and natural disasters;
 
•  our inability to successfully identify and manage our acquisitions or open new branches;
 
•  our inability to successfully manage our dual operating structure and uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of financial and management policies and procedures we established to improve accounting controls;
 
•  adverse developments concerning our relationships with certain key vendors;
 
•  our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property and litigation regarding intellectual property;
 
•  acts of terrorism, violence, war, natural disaster or other circumstances that cause damage or disruption to us, our facilities, our technology centers, our vendors or a majority of our customers;
 
•  the loss of key personnel or qualified technical staff;
 
•  the potential writedown of goodwill we have recorded in connection with our acquisitions;
 
•  the availability of cash to operate and expand our business as planned and to service our debt;
 
•  the increased expenses and administrative workload associated with being a public company;
 
•  risks relating to evaluations of controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; and
 
•  potential environmental liabilities.

       All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We undertake no obligation, and specifically decline any obligation, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this prospectus might not occur.

       See the section entitled “Risk Factors” for a more complete discussion of these risks and uncertainties and for other risks and uncertainties. These factors and the other risk factors described

22


 

in this prospectus are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

23


 

USE OF PROCEEDS

       We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately $104.5 million from the sale of            shares of common stock by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $     per share (the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), after deducting estimated underwriting commissions and discounts and estimated expenses and assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.

       We anticipate using the net proceeds to us from this offering as follows (as if the proceeds were applied as of June 30, 2004):

•  approximately $26.8 million to repurchase our preferred equity, including accrued interest, which becomes payable upon our initial public offering;
 
•  approximately $49.9 million to repay a portion of our $225 million senior second priority secured term loan facility, which has a maturity date of December 2009 and bears interest at a floating rate which was 8.625% as of September 1, 2004; and
 
•  the balance of approximately $27.8 million to repay a portion of our $100 million senior first priority secured term loan facility, which has a maturity date of June 2009 and bears interest at a floating rate which was 4.179% as of September 1, 2004.

       Pending application of the balance of the net proceeds described above, we plan to invest such balance in short and medium-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

DIVIDEND POLICY

       We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common equity. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to compliance with certain covenants under our credit facilities, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

REORGANIZATION

       Immediately prior to this offering, we will reorganize from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics Company. In the reorganization:

•  each common unit of Holdings will be exchanged for one share of our common stock;
 
•  each Holdings option will be exchanged for an option exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings option and with the same exercise price and vesting terms as the Holdings option; and
 
•  each Holdings warrant will become exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings warrant and on the same terms as the Holdings warrant.

       Pursuant to the operating agreement of Holdings, cash distributions are to be made to members of Holdings to provide them with funds to pay taxes that the members will owe for their share of our profits as a limited liability company through the date of our reorganization, calculated at the highest combined federal and state income tax rate applicable for tax withholding purposes, currently 43%. Accordingly, immediately prior to our reorganization, we will make a cash distribution to all members of Holdings of the estimated amount due the members with respect to such taxes in the amount of approximately $596,000. Within approximately 45 days after the closing of this

24


 

offering, when the final amount due the members with respect to such taxes has been calculated, we will make a final payment for the balance, if any, due to the members. In addition, certain of our members, Code Hennessey & Simmons IV, L.P. and ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. (the “CHS Entities”), in the past have received less than their proportionate share of distributions for such taxes and, under the terms of the operating agreement of Holdings, are owed the amount of the shortfall. In order to bring the total distributions to the CHS Entities into parity with the distributions with respect to such taxes made to other members, immediately prior to our reorganization, a distribution of approximately $10.5 million will be made to the CHS Entities. We may also make a further distribution to CHS Entities within 45 days after the closing of this offering if the estimated payment to the CHS Entities did not fully offset such shortfall.

CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

       On October 24, 2003, Holdings’ board of advisors determined to no longer use the audit services of Ernst & Young LLP and approved the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the subsequent interim period through October 24, 2003, we did not consult with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

       The reports of Ernst & Young LLP on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or a qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During our fiscal years 2001 and 2002 and the subsequent interim period through October 24, 2003, there were no disagreements between Ernst & Young LLP and us on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP would have caused it to make reference thereto in its reports on the financial statements for such period. There has been no matter that was the subject of a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

       We have provided Ernst & Young LLP with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested that Ernst & Young LLP furnish us with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not Ernst & Young LLP agrees with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated October 15, 2004, is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

25


 

CAPITALIZATION

       The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated capitalization as of June 30, 2004:

•  on an actual basis;
 
•  on a “pro forma” basis to reflect the reorganization of our company from a limited liability company to a corporation prior to the completion of this offering (see “Reorganization”); and
 
•  on a “pro forma as adjusted” basis to reflect the sale of          shares of our common stock by us in this offering and the application of the net proceeds as described under “Use of Proceeds.”

       This table should be read in conjunction with “Reorganization,” “Use of Proceeds,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

                               
As of June 30, 2004

Pro Forma
Actual Pro Forma As Adjusted



(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
  $ 16,809     $ 6,307     $ 6,307  
     
     
     
 
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities:
                       
 
Existing senior secured credit facilities(2)
  $ 321,696     $ 321,696     $ 244,385  
 
Capital leases
    9,230       9,230       9,230  
 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred membership units(3)
    26,773       26,773        
 
Seller notes from acquisitions(4)
    2,438       2,438       2,438  
     
     
     
 
     
Total long-term debt
    360,137       360,137       256,053  
Total equity/ deficit:
                       
 
Common members’ capital — 35,487,511 member common membership units issued and outstanding actual; none pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
    28,529              
 
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share — 150,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding actual; 35,487,511 issued and outstanding pro forma;                 issued and outstanding pro forma as adjusted
          35       35  
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share — 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding actual; none issued and outstanding pro forma; none issued and outstanding pro forma as adjusted
                 
 
Additional paid-in-capital
          28,494       132,994  
 
Deferred compensation
    (2,134 )     (2,134 )     (2,134 )
 
Accumulated equity (deficit):
                       
   
Accumulated earnings from inception, less distributions to members (1)(5)
    (66,610 )     (60,596 )     (62,767 )
   
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    136       136       136  
     
     
     
 
     
Total equity (deficit)(6)
    (40,079 )     (34,065 )     68,264  
     
     
     
 
     
Total capitalization
  $ 320,058     $ 326,072     $ 324,317  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Reflects the payment of $10.5 million to the CHS Entities in connection with our reorganization, but does not reflect the $596,000 distribution in respect to taxes. See “Reorganization.”

26


 

(2)  At June 30, 2004, our senior secured credit facilities consisted of two facilities: (i) a $130 million senior first priority secured facility, consisting of a $100 million term loan facility, of which $99.8 million was outstanding at June 30, 2004, and a $30 million revolving credit facility, none of which was outstanding at June 30, 2004; and (ii) a $225 million senior second priority secured term facility of which $225.0 million was outstanding at June 30, 2004. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, we repaid $11.6 million of our senior second priority secured term facility. We intend to apply the net proceeds from this offering to repay approximately $49.9 million of our second priority secured facility and the balance of approximately $27.8 million to repay a portion of our first priority secured facility. See “Use of Proceeds.”
 
(3)  Holdings issued 20,000 redeemable preferred units in connection with the 2000 recapitalization. Holders of such preferred units are entitled to an investment return of 13.25% per annum for periods prior to April 10, 2003 and 15.0% per annum thereafter. A portion of the investment return is distributed quarterly under a formula which takes into account federal and certain state and local income tax rates applicable to such investment return. The unpaid portion of the investment return accumulates annually and will be payable upon any redemption or repurchase of the preferred units. Pursuant to the terms of Holdings’ operating agreement, on the closing date of the offering, we will use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to repurchase all outstanding preferred units. The total amount we expect to pay to repurchase such preferred units, including the unpaid portion of the investment return, is approximately $26.8 million.
 
(4)  The seller notes were issued in connection with certain acquisitions, with interest rates ranging between 7.0% and 8.0% and maturities between 2004 and 2007.
 
(5)  Accumulated earnings from inception includes the income tax effects of the reorganization which will result in an income tax benefit and distributions to members of $16.5 million
 
(6)  The deficit of $40.1 million, as of June 30, 2004, includes $88.8 million in cash distributions to Holdings’ common unit holders made in connection with the 2000 recapitalization.

27


 

DILUTION

       If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock upon the completion of this offering.

       On a pro forma basis to give effect to our reorganization as Delaware corporation, as described in “Reorganization,” our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2004 equaled approximately $(285.2) million, or $(8.04) per share of common stock. Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock offered by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $          per share and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our net tangible book value, as adjusted, as of June 30, 2004 would have equaled approximately $                    million, or $          per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $          per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $          per share to new investors of common stock in this offering. The following table illustrates this per share dilution to new investors purchasing our common stock in this offering.

                   
Assumed initial public offering price per share
          $    
 
Net tangible book value per share at June 30, 2004
    (8.04 )        
 
Increase in net tangible value per share attributable to this offering
               
     
         
Net tangible book value per share after this offering
               
             
 
Dilution per common share to new investors
          $    
             
 

       The following table summarizes the differences between our existing stockholders and new investors, as of June 30, 2004, with respect to the number of shares of common stock issued by us, the total consideration paid and the average price per share paid. The calculations with respect to common shares purchased by new investors in this offering reflect the initial public offering price of $     per share before deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

                                           
Average
Shares Purchased Total Consideration Price


Per
Number Percent Amount Percent Share





Existing stockholders
    35,487,511         %   $ 168,954,000         %   $ 4.76  
New investors
                                       
 
Total
            100 %   $         100 %        

The discussion and tables above assume no exercise of any of the stock options to purchase 1,657,000 shares with exercise prices ranging from $4.88 to $5.85 per share and a weighted average exercise price of $5.18 per share outstanding at June 30, 2004. If all our outstanding options at June 30, 2004 had been exercised, the net tangible book value per share, as adjusted, would have been $(7.68) per share, representing an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $0.36 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $          per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering.

       If the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, sales by the selling stockholders in this offering will reduce the number of shares of common stock held by existing stockholders to                      shares or approximately           % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding upon the closing of this offering and will increase the number of shares held by new public investors to                      shares or approximately           % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering. See “Principal and Selling Stockholders.”

28


 

SELECTED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

       The selected historical and unaudited pro forma financial data presented below are derived from the audited financial statements of Holdings for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, and the unaudited financial statements of Holdings for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004. The selected historical financial data for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 are derived from unaudited interim financial statements which, in the opinion of management, include all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to state fairly the data included therein in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information, except for pro forma data. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma financial data set forth below give effect to our conversion to a Delaware corporation and the completion of this offering, as described in “Use of Proceeds.” The unaudited pro forma financial data are not necessarily indicative of our financial position or results of operations that might have occurred had the transactions they give effect to been completed as of the dates indicated and do not purport to represent what our financial position or results of operations might be for any future period or date. The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Capitalization,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited financial statements and unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                                         
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
                                                       
Net sales
  $ 223,836     $ 351,099     $ 420,701     $ 418,924     $ 415,960     $ 214,154     $ 226,133  
Cost of sales
    134,531       201,390       243,710       247,778       252,028       127,311       130,790  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    89,305       149,709       176,991       171,146       163,932       86,843       95,343  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    53,730       83,139       102,576       101,805       101,252       51,044       55,264  
Amortization of intangibles
    2,823       3,966       5,731       218       131       67       54  
Costs incurred in connection with the 2000 recapitalization
          20,544                                
Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities
          6,232       1,428       1,500                    
Write-off of intangible assets
                3,438                          
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from operations
    32,752       35,828       63,818       67,623       62,549       35,732       40,025  
Other income
    638       713       304       541       1,024       731       567  
Interest expense
    (9,215 )     (29,238 )     (47,530 )     (39,917 )     (39,390 )     (18,116 )     (16,248 )
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          (1,195 )                 (14,921 )            
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income before income tax provision
    24,175       6,108       16,592       28,247       9,262       18,347       24,344  
Income tax provision
    4,068       4,784       5,802       6,304       4,321       3,641       5,174  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income
    20,107       1,324       10,790       21,943       4,941       14,706       19,170  
Dividends and amortization of discount on preferred members’ equity
          (2,158 )     (3,107 )     (3,291 )     (1,730 )     (1,730 )      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common members
    20,107       (834 )     7,683       18,652       3,211       12,976       19,170  
Unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision(1)
    5,304       2,618       2,622       6,275       1,407       4,305       5,937  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common members
  $ 14,803     $ (3,452 )   $ 5,061     $ 12,377     $ 1,804     $ 8,671     $ 13,233  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

29


 

                                                           
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common members per common unit:
                                                       
 
Basic
  $ 0.60     $ (0.10 )   $ 0.14     $ 0.34     $ 0.05     $ 0.24     $ 0.37  
 
Diluted
  $ 0.60     $ (0.10 )   $ 0.14     $ 0.34     $ 0.05     $ 0.24     $ 0.35  
 
Weighted average units:
                                                       
 
Basic
    24,571       35,308       36,629       36,406       35,480       35,473       35,488  
 
Diluted
    24,571       35,371       36,758       36,723       37,298       35,999       37,440  
                                                         
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Other Financial Data:
                                                       
EBIT(2)(3)
  $ 33,390     $ 35,346     $ 64,122     $ 68,164     $ 48,652     $ 36,463     $ 40,592  
EBITDA(2)(3)
  $ 42,932     $ 50,288     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 67,011     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
Adjusted EBITDA(4)
  $ 42,932     $ 72,027     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 81,932     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
Depreciation and amortization(5)
  $ 9,542     $ 14,942     $ 25,372     $ 17,898     $ 18,359     $ 9,415     $ 8,623  
Capital expenditures, net
  $ 3,877     $ 5,228     $ 8,659     $ 5,209     $ 4,992     $ 1,817     $ 3,427  
Interest expense
  $ 9,215     $ 29,238     $ 47,530     $ 39,917     $ 39,390     $ 18,116     $ 16,248  
                                                 
As of December 31, As of

June 30,
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004






(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
                                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 15,814     $ 31,565     $ 29,110     $ 24,995     $ 17,315     $ 16,809  
Total assets
  $ 204,464     $ 358,026     $ 371,948     $ 395,677     $ 376,843     $ 389,133  
Long term obligations and mandatorily redeemable preferred and common membership units(6)(7)
  $ 123,951     $ 359,746     $ 371,515     $ 378,102     $ 360,008     $ 360,137  
Total members’ equity (deficit)(8)
  $ 32,422     $ (80,478 )   $ (78,900 )   $ (59,784 )   $ (57,329 )   $ (40,079 )
Working capital
  $ 15,379     $ 34,742     $ 24,338     $ 24,371     $ 16,809     $ 32,870  

(1)  Until our reorganization, which will be effective prior to the closing of this offering, a substantial portion of our business will continue to operate as a limited liability company, or LLC, and taxed as a partnership. As a result, the members of the LLC pay the income taxes on the earnings. The unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision amounts reflected in the table above were calculated as if our reorganization became effective on January 1, 1999.
 
(2)  EBIT is a non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest expense and income taxes. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. We believe that EBIT and EBITDA are, and will continue to be, financial measures useful to financial analysts and to the lending community because they are generally used in analyzing the operating performance of a company and its ability to service debt and otherwise meet its cash needs. EBIT and EBITDA, however, are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity. Since EBIT and EBITDA are not measures determined in accordance with GAAP and, thus, are susceptible to varying interpretations and calculations, EBIT and EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Neither EBIT nor EBITDA represents an amount of funds that is available for management’s discretionary use.

30


 

(3)  The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA, and pro forma net income:

                                                           
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 28,569     $ 28,054     $ 53,151     $ 56,413     $ 48,237     $ 26,922     $ 28,515  
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
    242       (95 )     (533 )     (5,482 )     (4,860 )     1,503       1,247  
 
Noncash expenses, including depreciation and amortization(5)
    (8,704 )     (26,635 )     (41,828 )     (28,988 )     (38,436 )     (13,719 )     (10,592 )
 
Income tax provision
    4,068       4,784       5,802       6,304       4,321       3,641       5,174  
 
Interest expense, net
    9,215       29,238       47,530       39,917       39,390       18,116       16,248  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBIT
    33,390       35,346       64,122       68,164       48,652       36,463       40,592  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    9,542       14,942       25,372       17,898       18,359       9,415       8,623  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBITDA
    42,932       50,288       89,494       86,062       67,011       45,878       49,215  
 
Interest expense
    (9,215 )     (29,238 )     (47,530 )     (39,917 )     (39,390 )     (18,116 )     (16,248 )
 
Income tax provision and unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision(1)
    (9,372 )     (7,402 )     (8,424 )     (12,579 )     (5,728 )     (7,946 )     (11,111 )
 
Depreciation and amortization(5)
    (9,542 )     (14,942 )     (25,372 )     (17,898 )     (18,359 )     (9,415 )     (8,623 )
 
Dividends and amortization of discount on preferred members’ equity
          (2,158 )     (3,107 )     (3,291 )     (1,730 )     (1,730 )      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common members
  $ 14,803     $ (3,452 )   $ 5,061     $ 12,377     $ 1,804     $ 8,671     $ 13,233  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

(4)  Adjusted EBITDA refers to our EBITDA, adjusted to exclude the impact of (i) costs incurred in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and (ii) loss on early extinguishments of debt. We believe that adjustment for these items is recognized by the industry in which we operate to be relevant as a supplementary non-GAAP financial measure widely used by financial analysts and others in our industry to meaningfully evaluate a company’s operating performance and ability to comply with its applicable debt covenants. We also use adjusted EBITDA to measure and pay annual management bonuses.
 
    In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future, we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
 
    The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to adjusted EBITDA:

                                                           
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, June 30,


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004







(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
EBITDA
  $ 42,932     $ 50,288     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 67,011     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
 
Costs incurred in connection with the 2000 recapitalization
          20,544                                
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          1,195                   14,921              
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 42,932     $ 72,027     $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 81,932     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

(5)  Depreciation and amortization includes a write-off of intangible assets of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
(6)  In July 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 150,“Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” In accordance with SFAS No. 150, the redeemable preferred equity of Holdings has been reclassified in our financial statements as a component of our total debt upon our adoption of this new standard. The redeemable preferred equity amounted to $25.8 million as of December 31, 2003 and $26.8 million as of June 30, 2004. SFAS No. 150 does not permit the restatement of financial statements for periods prior to the adoption of this standard.
 
(7)  Redeemable common membership units amounted to $6.0 million and $8.1 million at December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
 
(8)  The decline in total members’ equity (deficit) from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000 was a result of an $88.8 million cash distribution to Holdings’ common unit holders in connection with the 2000 recapitalization and the reclassification of $20.3 million of preferred equity issued in connection with the 2000 recapitalization upon the adoption of SFAS No. 150 in July 2003.

31


 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

       The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in forward-looking statements. See “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

       We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. We also provide these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as the technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality industries, that also require sophisticated document management services. The business-to-business services we provide to our customers include document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand . We provide our core services through industry leading technology and innovation, a sophisticated network of 173 locally branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs at our customers’ locations. We also sell reprographics equipment and supplies to complement our full range of service offerings. In further support of our core services, we license our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship online planroom, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our net sales were $416.0 million, of which approximately half were derived from our operations in California.

Factors Affecting Financial Performance

       Based on a review of the top 30% of our customers, representing approximately 90% of our net sales, and designating our customers as either AEC or non-AEC based on their primary use of our services, we believe that sales to the AEC market accounted for approximately 80% of our year to date net sales through August 31, 2004, with the remaining 20% consisting of sales to non-AEC markets. As a result, our operating results and financial condition are significantly impacted by various economic factors affecting the AEC industry, such as non-residential construction spending, GDP growth, interest rates, employment rates, office vacancy rates, and government expenditures. Similar to the AEC industry, we believe that the reprographics industry typically lags the recovery in the broader economy by approximately six months.

Key Financial Measures

       The following key financial measures are used by our management to operate and assess the performance of our business: net sales, EBIT, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and costs and expenses.

Net Sales

       Net sales represent total sales less returns, discounts and allowances. These sales consist of document management services, document distribution and logistics services, print-on-demand services, reprographics equipment and supplies, software licenses and PEiR memberships. We generate sales by individual orders through commissioned sales personnel and, in some cases, pursuant to national contracts. Our document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services, including the use of PlanWell by our customers, are typically invoiced to a customer as part of a per square foot printing cost.

       In 2003, our print-on-demand services represented approximately 76% of our net sales, facilities management revenues represented approximately 14%, and sales of reprographics equipment and supplies represented approximately 10%. Although our PlanWell and other software

32


 

licenses and our PEiR memberships are strategic to providing our other services, to date these services have not been significant revenue contributors.

       We identify reportable segments based on how management internally evaluates financial information, business activities and management responsibility. On that basis, we operate in a single reportable business segment.

       To a large extent, our continued engagement by our customers for successive jobs depends upon the customer’s satisfaction with the quality of services that we provide. Our customer orders tend to be of a short-run, but recurring, nature. Since we do not operate with a backlog, it is difficult for us to predict the number, size and profitability of reprographics work that we expect to undertake more than a few weeks in advance.

EBIT, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA

       EBIT, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA (and related ratios presented in this prospectus) are supplemental measures of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP. EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, income from operations, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

       EBIT represents net income before interest and taxes. EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted to exclude the impact of costs incurred in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and loss on early extinguishment of debt. We present EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because we consider them important supplemental measures of our performance and believe they are frequently used by securities analysts, investors, lenders and other interested parties in the evaluation of business services companies, many of which present EBITDA and/or Adjusted EBITDA when reporting their results. Our presentation of these measures should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

       We also use EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the following purposes: to measure the performance of our operating units, to control cash remittances from our branches, to evaluate potential acquisitions, to evaluate whether to incur capital expenditures, and to determine our compliance with the covenants in our credit agreements. We further use EBIT to measure performance and determine compensation at the division level, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to measure performance and determine compensation at the consolidated level.

       We calculate Adjusted EBITDA by adjusting EBITDA to eliminate the impact of a number of items we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operations and for the other reasons noted above. You are encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and whether you consider it appropriate. In addition, in evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

       EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•  they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
 
•  they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
 
•  they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debts;

33


 

•  although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;
 
•  Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations, as discussed in our presentation of “Adjusted EBITDA” in this prospectus; and
 
•  other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

       Because of these limitations, EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or reduce our indebtedness. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. For more information, see our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Costs and Expenses

       Our cost of sales consists primarily of paper, toner and other consumables, labor, and maintenance, repair, rental and insurance costs associated with operating our facilities and equipment, along with depreciation charges. Paper cost is the most significant component of our material cost; however, paper pricing typically does not impact our operating margins because changes in paper pricing are generally passed on to our customers. We closely monitor material cost as a percentage of net sales to measure volume and waste. We also track labor utilization, or net sales per employee, to measure productivity and determine staffing levels.

       We maintain low inventory balances as well as low levels of other working capital requirements. In addition, capital expenditure requirements are low as most facilities and equipment are leased, with overall capital spending averaging approximately 1.5% of annual net sales over the last three years. Since we typically lease our reprographics equipment for periods averaging between three and five years, we are able to upgrade our equipment in response to rapid changes in technology.

       Our selling expenses generally include the salaries and commissions paid to our sales professionals, along with promotional, travel and entertainment costs. Our general and administrative expenses generally include the salaries and benefits paid to support personnel at our reprographics businesses and our corporate staff, as well as office rent, utilities, insurance and communications expenses, and various professional services.

       Our general and administrative expenses also include management fees paid to CHS Management IV, L.P. in accordance with a management agreement entered into in connection with our recapitalization in 2000. These management fees, which may not exceed $1 million in any year, amounted to $803,000 during 2001, $889,000 during 2002, $858,000 during 2003, $415,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2003, and $413,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004. The management agreement will be terminated upon the completion of this offering.

Income Taxes

       Holdings and Opco, through which a substantial portion of our business is operated, are limited liability companies which are taxed as partnerships. As a result, the members of Holdings pay income taxes on the earnings of Opco, which are passed through to Holdings. Certain divisions are consolidated in Holdings and are treated as separate corporate entities for income tax purposes (the consolidated corporations). These consolidated corporations pay income tax and record provisions for income taxes in their financial statements. Following the reorganization of our company to a Delaware corporation, our earnings will be subject to federal, state and local taxes at a combined statutory rate of approximately 43%.

34


 

Members’ Deficit and Capital Accounts

       Our members’ deficit of $40.1 million as of June 30, 2004 includes $88.8 million in cash distributions to our common unit holders made in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and previous cash distributions made to the members of Holdings to provide them with funds to pay taxes owed for their share of our profits as a limited liability company.

       Immediately prior to our reorganization, we will make a cash distribution to all members of Holdings of the estimated amount due the members with respect to such taxes in the amount of approximately $596,000. After the closing of this offering, when the members’ final tax liability has been calculated, we will make a final payment for the balance, if any, due to the members. In addition, certain of our members, Code Hennessey & Simmons IV, L.P. and ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. (the “CHS Entities”), have in the past received less than their proportionate share of distributions for such taxes and are owed a distribution of approximately $10.5 million, which we will pay immediately prior to our reorganization. We may also make a further distribution to the CHS Entities after the closing of this offering if the estimated payment to the CHS Entities did not fully offset such shortfall.

Acquisitions

       Our financial results during the periods discussed below were impacted by the acquisition of 14 reprographics businesses in 2001 for a total purchase price of $32.6 million, eight acquisitions in 2002 for a total purchase price of $34.4 million, four acquisitions in 2003 for a total purchase price of $870,000 and three acquisitions in the six months ended June 30, 2004 for a total purchase price of $1.4 million. Because each acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, our consolidated income statements reflect sales and expenses of acquired businesses only for post-acquisition periods. For more details regarding these acquisitions, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

       In connection with certain large acquisitions, we have made certain payments to employees of the acquired companies and our management that could not be capitalized and included in goodwill because such payments represented compensation expense. These expenses are reflected in the expense line item titled “Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities” within our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

       The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and rely on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances to determine such estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. We believe the critical accounting policies and areas that require more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements to be: revenue recognition; goodwill and other intangible assets; impairment of long-lived assets; allowance for doubtful accounts; inventory reserves; and commitments and contingencies.

Revenue Recognition

       We apply the provisions of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements filed with the SEC. SAB No. 104 outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies. In general, we recognize revenue

35


 

when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the sales price charged is fixed or determinable and (iv) collection is reasonably assured.

       We recognize revenues from reprographics services when services have been rendered while revenues from the resale of reprographics supplies and equipment are recognized upon shipment. Revenues from software licensing activities are recognized over the term of the license. Revenues from membership fees are recognized over the term of the membership agreement.

       Management provides for returns, discounts and allowances based on historic experience and adjusts such allowances as considered necessary. To date, such provisions have been within the range of management’s expectations.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

       Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which requires, among other things, the use of a nonamortization approach for purchased goodwill and certain intangibles. Under a nonamortization approach, goodwill and intangibles having an indefinite life are not amortized, but instead will be reviewed for impairment at least annually or if an event occurs or circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level.

       SFAS 142 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

       We have selected September 30 as the date on which we will perform our annual goodwill impairment test. Based on our valuation of goodwill, no impairment charges related to the write-down of goodwill were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003. During the year ended December 31, 2001, we wrote-off $3.4 million of goodwill recorded from an acquisition completed during 2000 because the business was closed in 2001 due to underperformance.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

       We periodically assess potential impairments of our long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets.” An impairment review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered by us include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; and significant negative industry or economic trends. When we determine that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we estimate the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows and eventual disposition is less than the carrying amount of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss. An

36


 

impairment loss is reflected as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, based on the fair market value if available, or discounted cash flows, if not. To date, we have not had an impairment of long-lived assets.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

       We perform periodic credit evaluations of the financial condition of our customers, monitor collections and payments from customers, and generally do not require collateral. Receivables are generally due within 30 days. We provide for the possible inability to collect accounts receivable by recording an allowance for doubtful accounts. We write-off an account when it is considered to be uncollectible. We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical experience, aging of accounts receivable, and information regarding the creditworthiness of our customers. To date, uncollectible amounts have been within the range of management’s expectations.

Inventory Reserves

       On an ongoing basis, inventories are reviewed and written down for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventories equal to the difference between the costs of inventories and the estimated net realizable value. Charges to increase inventory reserves are recorded as an increase in cost of sales.

Commitments and Contingencies

       In the normal course of business, we estimate potential future loss accruals related to legal, tax and other contingencies. These accruals require management’s judgment on the outcome of various events based on the best available information. However, due to changes in facts and circumstances, the ultimate outcomes could be different than management’s estimates.

Results of Operations

       The following table provides information on the percentages of certain items of selected financial data compared to net sales for the periods indicated:

                                           
As a Percentage of Net Sales

Six Months
Year Ended Ended
December 31, June 30,


2001 2002 2003 2003 2004





(unaudited)
Net sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales
    57.9       59.1       60.6       59.4       57.8  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Gross profit
    42.1       40.9       39.4       40.6       42.2  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    24.4       24.3       24.3       23.8       24.4  
Amortization of intangibles
    1.4       0.1                    
Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities
    0.3       0.4                    
Write-off of intangible assets
    0.8                          
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income from operations
    15.2       16.1       15.1       16.8       17.8  

37


 

                                           
As a Percentage of Net Sales (Continued)

Six Months
Year Ended Ended
December 31, June 30,


2001 2002 2003 2003 2004





(unaudited)
Other income
          0.1       0.2       0.3       0.2  
Interest expense, net
    (11.3 )     (9.5 )     (9.5 )     (8.5 )     (7.2 )
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                (3.6 )            
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income before income tax provision
    3.9       6.7       2.2       8.6       10.8  
Income tax provision
    (1.4 )     (1.5 )     (1.0 )     (1.7 )     (2.3 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net income
    2.5 %     5.2 %     1.2 %     6.9 %     8.5 %
     
     
     
     
     
 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

       Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $12.0 million, or 5.6%, to $226.1 million from $214.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the improvement of the U.S. economy in the Western United States, acquisition activity, the expansion of our revenue base through the opening of new branches, and by increasing our market share in certain markets. Of the $12.0 million increase in our 2004 net sales, $4.8 million was attributable to our acquisition activity during 2003 and 2004.

       Net sales for the six months ended June 30 2004 from our Southern California divisions increased 7.4% compared to the same period in 2003. This was driven by our efforts to capture market share combined with a strong local economy.

       Net sales derived from our divisions located in Northern California increased 8.1% in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003, due to improving economic conditions, business derived from new markets we entered, and increased market share.

       Net sales from our divisions in the Southern United States increased 10.5% in the six months ended June 30, 2004 over the same period in 2003 driven by strong construction activity in Las Vegas and Tampa. These gains were partially offset by a 2.2% decline in net sales from our Houston divisions due to weak AEC activity in that market as a result of local corporate scandals that created an abundance of vacant office space.

       Net sales from our Midwest divisions declined 7.1% in the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 due to the continued softness in the manufacturing economy coupled with high unemployment rates in this region’s major markets.

       Net sales from our Northeast divisions increased 6.8% due to new business gained from the purchase of customers from a competitor that filed bankruptcy in New York in 2003. Excluding this purchase, net sales in the Northeast declined 1.1% due to the continued sluggish AEC economy in the Northeast since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

       Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $8.5 million to $95.3 million from $86.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 due primarily to the increase in our net sales coupled with the fixed cost nature of our leases for production equipment and facilities. Our gross margin improved by approximately 1.6 percentage points to 42.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to 40.6% in the comparable 2003 period. We were able to reduce our material cost as a percentage of net sales from 16.2% in the 2003 period to 15.6% in the 2004 period due to a negotiated reduction in the cost of material from one of our major vendors, coupled with better waste control procedures. Production labor cost as a percentage of net sales declined from 21.1% in the 2003 period to 20.7% in the 2004 period due to better staffing

38


 

efficiencies. The gains we achieved in material use and labor efficiency were partially offset by increased costs for energy and employee health benefits.

       Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased 8.4% to $55.3 million from $51.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. This was primarily due to higher sales commissions related to increased sales and higher incentive bonus accruals during 2004 compared to 2003 related to improved operating results. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased slightly to 24.5% from 23.8% in the comparable 2003 period. This increase reflected our larger sales force and increased selling and marketing activities during 2004 as we continued to pursue market share expansion. We also continued to make investments in personnel training and education.

       Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased 10.5% to $16.2 million from $18.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 due to the refinancing of our debt in December 2003, which lowered our overall effective interest rate in 2004 by approximately 1.8 percentage points. Also, since June 30, 2003, we reduced our outstanding debt by $45.7 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the interest benefit from our interest rate swap contracts was $3.0 million. The interest rate swap contracts expired in September 2003, and we entered into a new interest rate hedge in September 2003. This hedge instrument is accounted for as a hedge, and fluctuations in the market value of the hedge do not impact our income statement.

       Income Taxes. We provided for income taxes of $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, as compared to $3.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to higher pretax income at the consolidated corporations. Our overall effective income tax rate for the 2004 period decreased slightly to 21.2% compared to 19.8% in the comparable 2003 period.

       Net Income. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased 30.3% to $19.2 million from $14.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was primarily related to increased sales resulting from the improvement in the overall U.S. economy, increased AEC activity, as well as our reduced interest expense due to the refinancing of our debt in December 2003.

       EBITDA. EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $49.2 million, representing a $3.3 million, or 7.3%, increase from $45.9 million for the same period of 2003. Our EBITDA margin increased to 21.8% in the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to 21.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2003 period primarily due to higher revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to pro forma net income, please see “— Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” below.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

       Net Sales. Net sales for 2003 decreased $2.9 million, or 0.7%, to $416.0 million from $418.9 million in 2002, primarily due to the continued slowdown in the economy and the AEC industry, particularly in our Northern California and Northeast divisions, and the continued pricing pressure on our sales due to reduction in activity levels due to contraction in the economy. Our acquisitions in 2002 and 2003 partially offset this negative trend. Excluding the benefit of acquisitions completed in 2002 and 2003, our net sales would have decreased by $19.9 million or 5.1%.

       Net sales in our Southern California divisions increased 13.1% primarily due to the acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics in May 2002.

       Net sales derived from our divisions located in Northern California declined 12.1% to $77.5 million as a result of the continued soft economy and high commercial vacancy rates created from the continued contraction in the internet and technology sectors.

39


 

       Net sales from our Northeast divisions in 2003 decreased 7.1% compared to 2002 due to the economic slowdown in New York City and Washington, D.C. after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Additionally, our Washington, D.C. division was negatively affected by the entry of another reprographics firm in this market.

       Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2003 declined to $163.9 million from $171.1 million during 2002. This decline was mainly due to lower net sales in 2003, particularly in Northern California and the Northeast where aggregate net sales in 2003 declined by $16.1 million, combined with strong pricing pressure which reduced our profit margins. Our overall gross profit margin declined by 1.5 percentage points to 39.4% in 2003 from 40.9% in 2002, driven primarily by the fixed cost nature of our equipment and facility leases. Production overhead as a percentage of net sales, which includes lease and maintenance costs, increased from 17.5% in 2002 to 19.0% in 2003. Additionally, our cost of production labor increased $364,000 due to increased health and workers compensation insurance rates. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our material cost as a percentage of net sales.

       Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2003 remained flat at $101.3 million, or 24.3% of net sales, compared to $101.8 million in 2002 despite the decrease in our net sales and gross profit because we pursued market share expansion amid difficult industry conditions. As a result, our selling and marketing expenses increased by $1.0 million in 2003 compared to 2002 despite lower net sales in 2003. This was offset by a $2.5 million decrease in general and administrative expenses in 2003, which was primarily due to lower incentive bonus accruals resulting from the decline in our operating results.

       Acquisition Costs. There were no costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities during 2003 that could not be capitalized into goodwill, compared to $1.5 million expensed in 2002 related to signing bonuses to the senior management of a division acquired in 2002.

       Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense increased 1.3% in 2003 to $39.4 million compared to $39.9 million in 2002 due primarily to a net interest benefit from our interest rate swap contracts of $4.0 million in 2003 compared to a net interest benefit of $1.6 million in 2002, which was partially offset by a higher monthly average total debt balance during 2003 compared to 2002. Our monthly average total debt balance was higher during 2003 because of our acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics in May 2002 for which we incurred $20.0 million of net borrowings. The interest benefit related to the interest rate swap contracts was due to the improvement in the market value of the interest rate swap contracts as they moved closer to their expiration dates in September 2003.

       Income Taxes. We provided for income taxes of $4.3 million for 2003, as compared to $6.3 million in 2002 primarily due to lower pretax income at the consolidated corporations. Our overall effective income tax rate was 22.3% in 2002 and 21.2% in 2003.

       Net Income. We had net income of $4.9 million for 2003 compared to net income of $21.9 million for 2002. The $17.0 million decrease was primarily related to a $14.9 million loss related to the early extinguishment of debt in connection with our debt refinancing in December 2003.

       EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA for 2003 was $67.0 million, representing a $19.1 million, or 22.1%, decrease from $86.1 million for 2002. EBITDA as a percentage of net sales for 2003 decreased to 16.1% from 20.5% for 2002 primarily as a result of the $14.9 million of loss from early extinguishment of debt, which we incurred as part of our debt refinancing in December 2003. Our Adjusted EBITDA for 2003, which excludes this early extinguishment charge, was $81.9 million, or 19.7% of net sales compared to 20.5% for 2002. Our EBITDA margin decreased in 2003 from 2002 primarily because of lower revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to pro forma net income, please see “— Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” below.

40


 

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

       Net Sales. Net sales for 2002 decreased $1.8 million, or 0.4% to $418.9 million from $420.7 million in 2001, despite our acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics and seven other smaller reprographics companies in 2002. Excluding net sales related to businesses acquired during 2002 and 2001, net sales from our operations decreased by approximately $39.1 million, or 10.0%. The decrease in net sales was attributable to the continued downturn in the economy generally and the AEC industry and continued pricing pressure on our sales.

       Excluding 2002 acquisitions, our divisions located in Southern California, Northern California, the Pacific Northwest, and the Northeast each reported net sales declines in 2002 of 4.5%, 13.5%, 7.3% and 9.6%, respectively, compared to 2001. This decline was attributable to the nationwide softness in the economy, which fueled unemployment and high non-residential vacancy rates.

       Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2002 declined to $171.1 million from $177.0 million in 2001. This decline was due primarily to lower net sales in 2002. Our overall gross profit margin declined by 1.2 percentage points to 40.9% in 2002 from 42.1% in 2001, driven primarily by the fixed-cost nature of our leases for production equipment and facilities. Production overhead as a percentage of net sales, which includes lease and maintenance costs, increased from 15.6% in 2001 to 17.5% in 2002. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in our material cost as a percentage of net sales, caused by the lower cost of paper.

       Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2002 decreased 0.8% to $101.8 million from $102.6 million in 2001. Our legal fees in 2002 increased by $0.9 million compared to 2001 as a result of the investigation of our company by the Federal Trade Commission that was triggered by the Consolidated Reprographics acquisition and litigation that we pursued against certain competitors. Both of these matters have been concluded. This increase was offset by cost savings from the elimination of certain redundant administrative offices during late 2001. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses for 2002 decreased slightly to 24.3% from 24.4% in 2001.

       Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles for 2002 decreased to $0.2 million from $5.7 million in 2001, due to our discontinuing the amortization of goodwill pursuant to our adoption of SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002. In 2001, we wrote off $3.4 million of goodwill relating to a business acquired in 2000, which was subsequently closed in 2001 due to underperformance.

       Acquisition Costs. Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities for 2002 increased 5.0% to $1.5 million from $1.4 million in 2001. The costs expensed in 2002 represented $1.5 million in signing bonuses to the senior management of a division acquired in 2002. In 2001, these costs represented a bonus paid to the president of a division acquired in 2000. See note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

       Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for 2002 decreased 16.0% to $39.9 million from $47.5 million in 2001. This decrease was due to lower average borrowings and interest rates throughout 2002 as compared to 2001 and a net interest benefit from our interest rate swap contracts of $1.6 million compared to a net interest expense from our swap contracts of $5.6 million in 2001. The decrease was partially offset by additional borrowings incurred in May 2002 to finance the acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics, the addition of new capital leases, and higher interest expense from Holdings’ previously outstanding notes. The benefit from the swap contracts was due to the improvement in the market value of these rate swap contracts in 2002 as they moved closer to their expiration dates in September 2003.

       Income Taxes. We provided for income taxes of $6.3 million for 2002, as compared to $5.8 million in 2001 due to higher pretax income at the consolidated corporations. Our overall effective income tax rate for 2002 decreased to 22.3% as compared to 35.0% in 2001 due to the

41


 

write off of non-deductible goodwill in 2001, as well as the impact of the SFAS No. 133 transition adjustment.

       Net Income. Net income for 2002 increased to $21.9 million from $10.8 million in 2001. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million improvement in interest income related to an interest rate swap contract and a decrease of $5.5 million related to discontinuing the amortization of goodwill pursuant to our adoption of SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002.

       EBITDA. EBITDA for 2002 was $86.1 million, representing a decrease of $3.4 million, or 3.8%, from $89.5 million for 2001. EBITDA as a percentage of net sales for 2002 decreased to 20.5% from 21.3% for 2001 primarily as a result of lower revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to pro forma net income, please see “— Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” below.

Quarterly Results of Operations

       The following table sets forth certain quarterly financial data for the six quarters ended June 30, 2004. This quarterly information is unaudited, has been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in our opinion, reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the information for periods presented. Operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

                                                 
Quarter Ended

Mar. 31, June 30, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Mar. 31, June 30,






2003 2004


(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Net sales
  $ 105,272     $ 108,882     $ 102,184     $ 99,622     $ 110,518     $ 115,615  
Gross profit
  $ 42,292     $ 44,551     $ 39,229     $ 37,860     $ 45,919     $ 49,424  
Income from operations
  $ 17,014     $ 18,718     $ 14,114     $ 12,703     $ 18,986     $ 21,039  
EBITDA
  $ 21,989     $ 23,889     $ 19,097     $ 2,036     $ 23,376     $ 25,839  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 21,989     $ 23,889     $ 19,097     $ 16,957     $ 23,376     $ 25,839  
Net income (loss)
  $ 5,469     $ 9,237     $ 2,845     $ (12,610 )   $ 8,729     $ 10,441  

       The following is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and EBITDA to net income (loss) for each respective quarter.

                                                 
Quarter Ended

Mar. 31, June 30, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Mar. 31, June 30,






2003 2004


(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 21,989     $ 23,889     $ 19,097     $ 16,957     $ 23,376     $ 25,839  
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                      (14,921 )            
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBITDA
    21,989       23,889       19,097       2,036       23,376       25,839  
Interest expense
    (9,317 )     (8,799 )     (10,842 )     (10,432 )     (7,984 )     (8,264 )
Income tax benefit (provision)
    (2,428 )     (1,213 )     (776 )     96       (2,547 )     (2,627 )
Depreciation and amortization
    (4,775 )     (4,640 )     (4,634 )     (4,310 )     (4,116 )     (4,507 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 5,469     $ 9,237     $ 2,845     $ (12,610 )   $ 8,729     $ 10,441  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

       We believe that quarterly revenues and operating results may vary significantly in the future and that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. In addition, our quarterly

42


 

operating results are typically affected by seasonal factors, primarily the number of working days in a quarter. Historically, our fourth quarter is the slowest, reflecting the slowdown in construction activity during the holiday season, and our second quarter is the strongest, reflecting the fewest holidays and best weather compared to the other quarters.

Impact of Inflation

       Inflation has not had a significant effect on our operations. Price increases for raw materials such as paper typically have been, and we expect will continue to be, passed on to customers in the ordinary course of business.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

       Our principal sources of cash have been cash provided by operations and borrowings under our bank credit facilities or debt agreements. Our historical uses of cash have been for acquisitions of reprographics businesses, payment of principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, capital expenditures and tax-related distributions to our LLC members. Supplemental information pertaining to our historical sources and uses of cash is presented as follows and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated statements of cash flows and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                   
Six Months
Year Ended December 31, Ended

June 30,
2001 2002 2003 2004




(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 53,151     $ 56,413     $ 48,237     $ 28,515  
     
     
     
     
 
Acquisitions of businesses
  $ (27,822 )   $ (40,355 )   $ (3,116 )   $ (1,880 )
Capital expenditures
    (8,659 )     (5,209 )     (4,992 )     (3,427 )
Other
    (584 )     (354 )     (228 )     53  
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (37,065 )   $ (45,918 )   $ (8,336 )   $ (5,254 )
     
     
     
     
 
Proceeds from borrowings under debt agreements
  $ 5,220     $ 32,000     $ 337,750     $ 1,000  
Payments under debt agreements
    (20,350 )     (35,507 )     (375,613 )     (21,367 )
Payment of loan fees
          (950 )     (8,159 )     (355 )
Proceeds from issuance of common membership units
                111        
Member distributions and redemptions
    (3,411 )     (10,153 )     (1,670 )     (3,045 )
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities
  $ (18,541 )   $ (14,610 )   $ (47,581 )   $ (23,767 )
     
     
     
     
 

43


 

       Our cash position, working capital and debt obligations as of December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and June 30, 2004 are shown below and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated balance sheets and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                   
December 31,

June 30,
2001 2002 2003 2004




(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 29,110     $ 24,995     $ 17,315     $ 16,809  
Working capital
  $ 24,338     $ 24,371     $ 16,809     $ 32,870  
Mandatorily redeemable preferred and common membership units
  $ 30,116     $ 23,903     $ 25,791     $ 26,773  
Other debt obligations
    364,738       378,608       359,340       344,130  
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total debt obligations
  $ 394,854     $ 402,511     $ 385,131     $ 370,903  

       Debt obligations as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004 include $25.8 million and $26.8 million of redeemable preferred equity which has been reclassified in our financial statements as a component of our total debt upon our adoption of SFAS No. 150 in July 2003. Debt obligations as of December 31, 2001 includes $8.2 million of redeemable common membership units.

       We believe that our cash flow provided by operations will be adequate to cover our 2005 working capital needs, debt service requirements and planned capital expenditures to the extent such items are known or are reasonably determinable based on current business and market conditions. However, we may elect to finance certain of our capital expenditure requirements through borrowings under our credit facilities or the issuance of additional debt.

       We continually evaluate potential acquisitions. Absent a compelling strategic reason, we expect that all future acquisitions will be cash flow accretive within six months. Currently, we are not party to any agreements or engaged in any negotiations regarding a material acquisition. We expect to fund future acquisitions through cash flow provided by operations, additional borrowings or the issuance of our equity. The extent to which we will be willing or able to use our equity or a mix of equity and cash payments to make acquisitions will depend on the market value of our shares from time to time and the willingness of potential sellers to accept equity as full or partial payment.

Debt Obligations

       Senior Secured Credit Facilities. We have two senior secured credit facilities: a $130 million senior first priority secured facility, or first priority facility, and a $225 million senior second priority secured facility, or second priority facility. Our first priority facility consists of a $100 million senior first priority secured term loan facility, or term facility, and a $30 million senior first priority secured revolving credit facility, or revolving facility. Our second priority facility consists of a $225 million senior second priority secured term loan facility. The proceeds of the term facility and a portion of the revolving facility, together with substantially all of the proceeds of the second priority facility, were used to refinance our then existing debt in December 2003. We may use amounts remaining available under the revolving facility for working capital, certain permitted acquisitions and general corporate purposes. See “Description of Certain Indebtedness.”

       The term facility matures in June 2009, the revolving facility matures in December 2008 and the second priority facility matures in December 2009. Opco’s obligations under each of the credit facilities are guaranteed by Holdings and each of its domestic subsidiaries. In addition, subject to limited exceptions, the first priority facility is secured by first priority security interests in all of Opco’s assets and the assets of Holdings and its domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the assets of its foreign subsidiary. The second priority facility is secured by second priority security interests in the assets securing the first priority facility. The priority of the security interests and related creditor rights

44


 

between the first priority facility and the second priority facility are subject to an intercreditor agreement.

       Loans made under the credit facilities bear interest at a floating rate and may be maintained as index rate loans or as LIBOR rate loans. Index rate loans bear interest at the index rate plus the applicable index rate margin, as described in the first priority facility. Index rate is defined as the higher of (1) the rate of interest publicly quoted from time to time by The Wall Street Journal as the base rate on corporate loans posted by at least 75% of the nation’s 30 largest banks, and (2) the Federal Reserve reported overnight funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%. LIBOR rate loans bear interest at the LIBOR rate, as described in the first priority facility, plus the applicable LIBOR rate margin.

       The applicable margin with respect to the term facility is 2.00% in the case of index rate loans and 3.00% in the case of LIBOR rate loans. The applicable margin for the revolving facility is determined by a grid based on the ratio of our consolidated indebtedness to our consolidated adjusted EBITDA (as defined in our credit facilities) for the most recently ended four fiscal quarters and range between 2.00% and 2.75% for LIBOR rate loans and range between 1.00% and 1.75% for index rate loans.

       The applicable margin with respect to loans made under the second priority facility is 5.875% in the case of index rate loans and 6.875% in the case of LIBOR rate loans; provided, that, if the ratio of our consolidated indebtedness over our consolidated adjusted EBITDA (as defined in our credit facilities) is greater than 4.8:1.0 for any four fiscal quarters, each of the applicable margins set forth above will be increased by 100 basis points. In addition to the foregoing, loans made under the second priority facility are issued at a discount of 1.0% to the face amount.

       The following tables sets forth the outstanding balance, borrowing capacity and applicable interest rate under our senior secured credit facilities.

                                                 
As of December 31, 2003 As of June 30, 2004


Available Available
Borrowing Interest Borrowing Interest
Balance Capacity Rate Balance Capacity Rate






(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Term facility
  $ 100,000     $       5.75%     $ 99,750     $       4.18%  
Revolving facility
    15,000       15,000       5.75%             30,000        
Second priority facility, excluding debt discount
    225,000             9.8%       225,000             8.63%  
     
     
             
     
         
    $ 340,000     $ 15,000             $ 324,750     $ 30,000          
     
     
             
     
         

       In addition, under the revolving facility, we are required to pay a fee equal to 0.50% of the total unused commitment amount. We may also draw upon this credit facility through letters of credit which carry specific fees.

       Redeemable Preferred Units. As of June 30, 2004, we had $26.8 million of redeemable, non-voting preferred membership units. Holders of the redeemable preferred units are entitled to receive a yield of 13.25% of its liquidation value per annum for the first three years starting in April 2000, and increasing to 15% of the liquidation value per annum thereafter. The discount inherent in the yield for the first three years was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the redeemable preferred units. This discount was amortized as a dividend over the initial three years. Of the total yield on the redeemable preferred units, 48% is mandatorily payable quarterly in cash to the redeemable preferred unit holders. The unpaid portion of the yield accumulates annually and is added to the liquidation value of the redeemable preferred units. The preferred units are redeemable without premium or penalty, wholly or in part, at Holdings’ option at any time, for the

45


 

liquidation value, including any unpaid yield. The preferred units are mandatorily redeemable on the closing of this offering to the extent of 25% of the net proceeds from this offering.

       Seller Notes. As of June 30, 2004, we had $6.0 million of seller notes outstanding, with interest rates ranging between 7.0% and 8.0% and maturities between 2004 and 2007. These notes were issued in connection with prior acquisitions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

       At December 31, 2003 and 2002, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

       Our future contractual obligations as of June 30, 2004 by fiscal year are as follows:

                                                   
Six Months
Ending Twelve Months Ending December 31,
December 31,
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Thereafter






(Dollars in thousands)
Debt obligations, including mandatorily redeemable preferred equity
  $ 2,335     $ 3,722     $ 1,696     $ 635     $ 47,875     $ 298,949  
Capital lease obligations
    3,503       5,646       3,379       1,813       818       532  
Operating lease obligations
    15,037       23,800       13,982       9,279       6,329       18,794  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
  $ 20,875     $ 33,168     $ 19,057     $ 11,727     $ 55,022     $ 318,275  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

       Operating Leases. We have entered into various noncancelable operating leases primarily related to facilities, equipment and vehicles used in the ordinary course of our business.

       Contingent Transaction Consideration. We have entered into earnout agreements in connection with prior acquisitions. If the acquired businesses generate operating profits in excess of pre-determined targets, we are obligated to make additional cash payments in accordance with the terms of such earnout agreements. As of June 30, 2004, we estimate that we will be required to make additional cash payments of up to $822,000 between 2004 to 2007. These additional cash payments are accounted for as goodwill when earned.

       We are involved in a dispute with a state tax authority related to an unresolved sales tax issue which arose from such state tax authority’s audit findings from their sales tax audit of certain of our operating divisions for the period from October 1998 to September 2001. The unresolved issue relates to the application of sales taxes on certain discounts we granted to our customers. Based on the position taken by the state tax authority on this unresolved issue, they have claimed that an additional $1.2 million of sales taxes are due from us for the period in question, plus approximately $0.4 million of interest. We strongly disagree with the state tax authority’s position and have filed a petition for redetermination requesting an appeals conference to resolve this issue. A date for the appeals conference originally scheduled in July 2004 has been postponed at the request of the state tax authority to a later date which has not yet been determined. The accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004 each include approximately $0.2 million of reserves related to this unresolved matter.

46


 

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures

       The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA and unaudited pro forma net income:

                                           
Fiscal Year Ended Six Months Ended
December 31, June 30,


2001 2002 2003 2003 2004





(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 53,151     $ 56,413     $ 48,237     $ 26,922     $ 28,515  
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
    (533 )     (5,482 )     (4,860 )     1,503       1,247  
 
Non-cash expenses, including depreciation and amortization
    (41,828 )     (28,988 )     (38,436 )     (13,719 )     (10,592 )
 
Income tax provision
    5,802       6,304       4,321       3,641       5,174  
 
Interest expense
    47,530       39,917       39,390       18,116       16,248  
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBIT
    64,122       68,164       48,652       36,463       40,592  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    25,372       17,898       18,359       9,415       8,623  
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBITDA
    89,494       86,062       67,011       45,878       49,215  
 
Interest expense
    (47,530 )     (39,917 )     (39,390 )     (18,116 )     (16,248 )
 
Income tax provision and unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision
    (8,424 )     (12,579 )     (5,728 )     (7,946 )     (11,111 )
 
Depreciation and amortization
    (25,372 )     (17,898 )     (18,359 )     (9,415 )     (8,456 )
 
Dividends and amortization of discount on preferred members’ equity
    (3,107 )     (3,291 )     (1,730 )     (1,730 )      
     
     
     
     
     
 
Unaudited pro forma net income attributable to common members
  $ 5,061     $ 12,377     $ 1,804     $ 8,671     $ 13,233  
     
     
     
     
     
 

       The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA:

                                           
Fiscal Year Ended Six Months Ended
December 31, June 30,


2001 2002 2003 2003 2004





(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
EBITDA
  $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 67,011     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                14,921              
     
     
     
     
     
 
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 89,494     $ 86,062     $ 81,932     $ 45,878     $ 49,215  
     
     
     
     
     
 

For the reasons why we use EBIT, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA, see “— Key Financial Measures — EBIT, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA” above.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

       Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments. We use both fixed and variable rate debt as sources of financing. In September 2003, we entered into an interest rate hedge agreement with a notional amount of $111.2 million to reduce our

47


 

exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. Under the hedge agreement, we pay a fixed rate of 2.29% and we receive a variable rate equal to the 1-month LIBOR rate. The difference between the fixed and variable rates is settled monthly and is recognized as an increase or decrease in interest expense. The notional amount of the hedge agreement is reduced quarterly by an amount equal to 50% of our scheduled quarterly principal payments on our senior credit facilities. Upon the expiration of the hedge agreement in September 2005, the notional amount will have been reduced to $96.0 million.

       In January 2004, we entered into two interest rate collar agreements, referred to as the front-end and the back-end interest rate collar agreements. The front-end interest rate collar agreement has an initial notional amount of $22.6 million which is increased quarterly to reflect reductions in the notional amount of our interest rate swap agreement, such that the notional amount of the swap agreement, together with the notional amount of the front-end interest rate collar agreement, remains not less than 40% of the aggregate principal amount outstanding on our senior credit facilities. The front-end interest rate collar agreement expires in September 2005. The back-end interest rate collar agreement becomes effective upon expiration of the swap agreement and front-end interest rate collar agreement in September 2005 and has a fixed notional amount of $111.0 million. The back-end interest rate collar agreement expires in December 2006. At June 30, 2004, the fair value of these interest rate collar agreements was immaterial.

       At December 31, 2003, we had $385.1 million of total debt outstanding of which $340.0 million was bearing interest at variable rates approximating 8.5%. A 1.0% change in interest rates on variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating by approximately $2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2003.

       We have not, and do not plan to, enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of December 31, 2003, we had no other significant material exposure to market risk, including foreign exchange risk and commodity risks.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

       In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” SFAS No. 145 updates, clarifies, and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. This statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria in Accounting Principles Board No. 30 will now be used to classify those gains and losses. SFAS No. 64 amended SFAS No. 4 and is no longer necessary as SFAS No. 4 has been rescinded. SFAS No. 44 has been rescinded as it is no longer necessary. SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13 to require that certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions be accounted for in the same manner as sale-lease transactions. This statement also makes technical corrections to existing pronouncements. While those corrections are not substantive in nature, in some instances, they may change accounting practice. Our adoption of SFAS No. 145 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

       In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity,” under which a liability for an exit cost was recognized as of the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at fair value when the liability is incurred. Our adoption of this standard effective January 1, 2003 had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

       In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This interpretation elaborates on disclosures required in financial

48


 

statements concerning obligations under certain guarantees. It also clarifies the requirements related to the recognition of liabilities by a guarantor at the inception of certain guarantees. Our adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations or cash flows.

       In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” an amendment of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require more prominent and more frequent disclosures in financial statements about the effects of stock-based compensation. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Our adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not have any impact on our financial statements as management does not have any intention to change to the fair value method.

       In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which addresses the consolidation of business enterprises (variable interest entities) to which the usual condition (ownership of a majority voting interest) of consolidation does not apply. The interpretation focuses on financial interests that indicate control. It concludes that in the absence of clear control through voting interests, a company’s exposure (variable interest) to the economic risks and potential rewards from the variable interest entity’s assets and activities are the best evidence of control. Variable interests are rights and obligations that convey economic gains or losses from changes in the values of the variable interest entity’s assets and liabilities. Variable interests may arise from financial instruments, service contracts, nonvoting ownership interests and other arrangements. If an enterprise holds a majority of the variable interests of an entity, it would be considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary would be required to include the assets, liabilities and the results of operations of the variable interest entity in its financial statements. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 to address certain implementation issues. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46 (revised) had no material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

       In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies the financial accounting and reporting of derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except for certain hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

       In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (SFAS 150). SFAS 150 requires issuers to classify as liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) three classes of freestanding financial instruments that embody obligations for the issuer. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and is otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. We adopted SFAS 150 on July 1, 2003, which resulted in classifying mandatorily redeemable preferred stock as a liability in the balance sheet and related accretion being charged to interest expense in the statement of operations. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for more detail.

49


 

BUSINESS

Our Company

       We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. We also provide these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality, that also require sophisticated document management services. The business-to-business services we provide to our customers include document management, document distribution and logistics , and print-on-demand . We provide our core services through industry leading technology and innovation, a sophisticated network of 173 locally branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs at our customers’ locations. We also sell reprographics equipment and supplies to complement our full range of service offerings. In further support of our core services, we license our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship internet-based application, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. We also operate PEiR (Profit and Education in Reprographics) through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers, while promoting our reprographics technology as the industry standard. Our services are critical to our customers because they shorten their document processing and distribution time, improve the quality of their document information management, and provide a secure, controlled document management environment.

       We operate 173 reprographics service centers, including 170 service centers in 133 cities in 29 states throughout the United States and three reprographics service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. Our reprographics service centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. These service centers are arranged in a hub and satellite structure and are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide our services both locally and nationally. We service more than 65,000 active customers and employ over 3,450 people, including a sales force of approximately 270 employees.

       In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We believe that our extensive national footprint, our industry leading technology, and our comprehensive offering of value-added services, including logistics and facilities management, provide us with a distinct competitive advantage.

       While we began our operations in California and currently derive approximately half of our net sales from our operations in the state, we have continued to expand our geographic coverage and market share by entering complementary markets through strategic acquisitions of high quality companies with well recognized local brand names and, in most cases, more than 25 years of operating history. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 companies and have retained approximately 93% of the management of the acquired companies. As part of our growth strategy, we have recently begun opening and operating branch service centers, which we view as a low cost, rapid form of market expansion. Our branch openings require modest capital expenditures and are expected to generate operating profit within 12 months from opening. We have opened 15 new branches in key markets since September 2003 and expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005.

Corporate Background and Reorganization

       Our predecessor, Ford Graphics, was founded in Los Angeles, California in 1960. In 1967, this sole proprietorship was dissolved and a new corporate structure was established under the name Micro Device, Inc., which continued to provide reprographics services under the name Ford

50


 

Graphics. In 1989, our current senior management team purchased Micro Device, Inc., and in November 1997 our company was recapitalized as a California limited liability company, with management retaining a 50% ownership position and the remainder owned by outside investors. In February 2000, Code Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., or CHS IV, a private equity fund formed by Code Hennessy & Simmons L.L.C., or CHS, acquired a 50% stake in our company from these outside investors in the 2000 recapitalization.

       We are currently organized as American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Holdings. We conduct our operations through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American Reprographics Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Opco, and its subsidiaries.

       Immediately prior to the closing of this offering, we will reorganize from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics Company. In the reorganization, the members of Holdings will exchange their common units and options to purchase common units for shares of our common stock and options to purchase shares of our common stock. As required by the operating agreement of Holdings, we will repurchase all of the preferred equity of Holdings upon the closing of this offering with a portion of the net proceeds from this offering. After our reorganization, all outstanding warrants to purchase common units will be exercisable for shares of our common stock.

Current Ownership

       CHS is a private equity firm based in Chicago, Illinois specializing in leveraged buyouts and recapitalizations of middle market companies in partnership with company management through its private equity funds, including CHS IV. Since its founding in 1988, CHS has formed four private equity funds totaling $1.6 billion and currently has investments in 19 operating companies with combined annual revenues of more than $4.0 billion. CHS presently manages $1.5 billion of equity capital from leading financial institutions, pension funds, insurance companies, and university endowments. Its principal offices are located at 10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3175, Chicago, Illinois 60606. As of September 30, 2004, CHS IV and its affiliates owned approximately 49% of our outstanding common equity.

       Our founders, Mr. Chandramohan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Suriyakumar, President and Chief Operating Officer, purchased ARC in 1989 under its predecessor name, Micro Device, Inc., are still actively involved in the business, and have provided continuity of leadership and control since then. As of September 30, 2004, our executive officers had a pecuniary interest in approximately 33% of our outstanding common equity. See “Principal and Selling Stockholders.”

Major Acquisitions

       In addition to our primary focus on the growth of our business, we have pursued tactical acquisitions to expand and complement our existing service offerings and to expand our geographic locations where we believe we could be a market leader. For example, our acquisition of Ridgways, Inc. in September 2000 enabled us to expand our geographic reach and market penetration in 14 major metropolitan markets. In March 2002, we acquired certain assets of the Consolidated Reprographics division of Lason Systems, Inc., which allowed us to increase our market penetration in Southern California. In May 1999, we purchased certain technology and related know-how for software, which helped us expand our technology center and add personnel necessary to assist in developing PlanWell. In March 2000, we acquired certain assets of Sierra Network Systems, Inc., including technologies that contributed to our continued development of PlanWell.

       We intend to continue to pursue a disciplined course of growing our business through complementary acquisitions. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions and may engage in acquisition negotiations at any time and from time to time. Currently, we are not party to any agreements or engaged in any negotiations regarding a material acquisition.

51


 

Industry Overview

       The reprographics industry has traditionally provided services related to the reproduction and distribution of large format architectural, engineering and construction documents. Customer demands for speed and efficiency and advances in technology have transformed the reprographics industry such that reprographers are now expected to offer complex digital document management capabilities, document distribution expertise, comprehensive logistics, and the ability to provide document services under intense deadlines. These sophisticated services typically are charged as part of a per square foot printing cost.

       According to the International Reprographics Association, or IRgA, the reprographics industry in the United States is estimated to be $5 billion in size. The IRgA indicates that the reprographics industry is highly fragmented, consisting of approximately 3,000 firms with average annual sales of approximately $1.5 million and 20 to 25 employees. Since construction documents are the primary medium of communication for the AEC industry, demand for reprographics services in the AEC market is closely tied to the level of activity in the construction industry, which in turn is driven by macroeconomic trends such as GDP growth, interest rates, job creation, office vacancy rates, and tax revenues. According to FMI Corporation, or FMI, a consulting firm to the construction industry, construction industry spending in the United States for 2004 is estimated at $975 billion, with expenditures divided between residential construction (55%) and commercial and public, or non-residential, construction (45%). Our AEC revenues are most closely correlated to the non-residential sectors of the construction industry because these sectors are the largest users of reprographics services. According to FMI, the non-residential sectors of the construction industry are projected to grow at an average of 5.4% per year over the next three years.

       For over 100 years, AEC customers have used reprographics services to print, distribute, and store architectural, engineering and construction diagrams and plans. Prior to the 1980’s, the blueprint was the primary medium of communication among the highly fragmented team of AEC professionals who was responsible for the creation and development of a construction project. With the advent of Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) software and the corresponding need for improved graphic reproduction and color graphics to support the digital nature of construction documents, reprographers have evolved their products and services to facilitate better communication through digital means. The production of documents through digital means significantly decreases errors in drawing interpretation due to the increased quality of information and the clarity with which these documents can be produced. The introduction of the internet spurred additional service and technology development, especially in the area of document management, document distribution and logistic services and print-on-demand.

       Non-residential construction projects are generally large in scale, time consuming, and subject to cost overruns and delays. A frequent cause of such problems is the complexity of the construction documentation and the logistics involved in distributing documents to their intended recipients. Reprographers can facilitate better document management through technology applications. For example, reprographers can provide more efficient document distribution by shifting from an analog “print and distribute” business model, where customer orders are placed and produced in one location and physically distributed locally or nationally, to a digital “distribute and print” model, where customer orders are placed in one location, distributed digitally and physically produced at one or more local service centers.

       Market opportunities for business-to-business document management services such as ours are rapidly expanding into non-AEC industries. For example, non-AEC customers are increasingly using large and small format color imaging for point-of-purchase displays, digital publishing, presentation materials, educational materials and marketing materials as these services have become more efficient and available on a short run, on-demand basis through digital technology. As a result, we believe that our addressable market is substantially larger than the core AEC reprographics market. We believe that the growth of non-AEC industries is generally tied to growth in

52


 

the U.S. gross domestic product, or GDP, which is projected to grow 4.3% in 2004 and 3.6% in 2005 according to Wall Street’s consensus estimates.

       The development of digital technology and internet-based solutions for managing documents and the corresponding distribution and reproduction processes have also created an additional opportunity for reprographics companies such as ourselves to offer complementary, value-added services to AEC and non-AEC customers through intelligent technological solutions and an extensive physical network.

       We believe the following general trends will continue to impact our business:

•  Economic Recovery. The recovery in the overall economy is expected to boost construction activity. We estimate that recovery in non-residential construction typically lags the recovery in the broader economy by approximately six months, and we believe that we are at the early stages of an upturn in the non-residential construction cycle. FMI forecasts increases in non-residential construction spending at an average of 5.4% per year over the next three years. The economy is continuing to show signs of recovery as indicated by positive GDP growth, employment growth, increased consumer confidence and supportive monetary policy. Wall Street’s consensus estimates forecast real GDP growth of 4.3% in 2004 and 3.6% in 2005.

  We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on these recovery trends through our economies of scale and through our nationwide network of service centers.

•  Digitization. The AEC industry is increasingly becoming digital, creating substantial efficiencies and cost savings for participants of the AEC industry through electronic design and collaboration. Improved document management by the AEC industry is compelling to participants due to frequent cost overruns and completion delays attributable to poor and inaccurate use of plans, specifications and other construction documentation, as well as the complex nature of construction projects. AEC and non-AEC customers alike are increasingly demanding higher value-added, comprehensive digital reprographics services. To meet the demands of the customers, the reprographics industry has been converting its main production technology from analog to digital. Digital technology is cost effective, allows for just-in-time printing and results in high quality documents that can be stored electronically, modified easily and printed in any quantity at any time. The internet is becoming the new distribution channel for the AEC industry, allowing reprographics businesses to shift from a “print and distribute” business model to a “distribute and print” model.

  We believe we are at the forefront of this industry trend and conduct our operations entirely by digital means through our 173 digitally connected service centers, each with similar production equipment and quality standards, and by enabling the digital fulfillment of our reprographics services through the development of our proprietary software, including PlanWell.

•  Expanding Geographic Presence. AEC firms of all sizes are expanding their operations into larger geographic territories. This trend requires reprographers to expand their service levels and offerings to keep up with customer demand. As a result, the ability to fulfill reprographics services across wider areas increases the logistical burden for the vast majority of reprographers, which are typically small, privately-held companies that serve only local markets. In addition, the desire for customers to possess a degree of centralized administrative control over their documents requires the support of a corresponding digital infrastructure. As AEC firms continue to decentralize and shift to the “distribute and print” model, we believe that reprographics firms with a comprehensive digital network and footprint of service facilities such as ours will be best positioned to serve their customers.

  The digitization of the AEC industry has also enabled AEC firms to expand globally to take advantage of opportunities in the global construction industry, which according to FMI is $3.3 trillion in size, and diversify the risks associated with operating in one region or one country. International reprographics markets appear to mirror the fragmentation and the small business

53


 

  orientation of the U.S. market, with few large reprographics companies. In addition, our recent efforts to introduce our technology solutions into Europe and Asia indicate that there is a significant lag in the adoption and availability of digital reprographics technology in those markets.
 
  We believe that the addressable reprographics market of the global construction industry is significantly larger than the U.S. reprographics market and that we are well positioned to service the needs of global AEC firms. Our abilities to leverage our technology, offer value-added business service offerings, expand our physical operations, and successfully integrate new businesses offer us significant opportunities for growth outside the United States.

•  Secular Trends Favoring Outsourcing. Both AEC and non-AEC businesses are focused on increasing productivity by specializing in their core competencies and outsourcing non-core operations such as reprographics. The rapid pace of technological advances and the high costs of purchasing and operating equipment for in-house reprographics departments have further contributed to this trend. According to IDC, a global market intelligence and advisory firm, on-site outsourcing revenue will increase from $4.8 billion in 2003 to $6.6 billion in 2008, resulting in a projected CAGR of 6%. IDC also indicates that revenue from facilities management services and mailroom management services, from which the bulk of on-site revenue is derived, is expected to increase from $4.3 billion in 2003 to $5.9 billion in 2008, representing a projected CAGR of 6%.

  With a current base of more than 1,560 on-site facilities management programs, we believe we can leverage our depth of experience in selling and managing these programs into a growth opportunity that will meet or exceed the potential growth rate of the market itself.

Our Competitive Strengths

       We believe that we maintain the following competitive strengths:

•  Leading Market Position in Fragmented Industry. In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We are the largest reprographer in most of the geographic markets we serve, as the majority of the approximately 3,000 firms in the reprographics industry are small and locally focused. Our size and national footprint provide us with significant purchasing power, economies of scale, the ability to invest in industry leading technologies, and the resources to service large, national customers. Our well-recognized local brand names and our reputation for quality and reliability within the reprographics and AEC industries, supported by our ability to provide a wide range of services, have allowed us to gain and sustain the leading position in our industry.
 
•  Leader in Technology and Innovation. We strive to maintain the leading position in our industry by creating innovative, value-added technology solutions for our customers and other independent reprographers. We develop and support our industry leading suite of reprographics technology products through a team of approximately 20 full-time engineers and technical specialists at our two technology centers in Silicon Valley, as well as through continued investment in research and development. We also draw upon the combined experience, expertise and market insight of the management of our acquired reprographics firms to design, evaluate and improve our reprographics technology products. We believe PlanWell is best positioned to become the industry standard within the AEC industry. From PlanWell’s inception in June 2000 through September 1, 2004, more than 650,000 orders have been placed through PlanWell online planrooms for the management of more than 54,000 projects and seven million complex, large format documents. In addition, we have developed other proprietary software applications that complement PlanWell and have enabled us to improve the efficiency of our services, add complementary services and increase our opportunities for capturing revenue. These include Abacus PCR, our proprietary job tracking software, BidCaster, our proprietary “Invitation to Bid” tool (ITB), EWO, our proprietary electronic work order application, MetaPrint, our print automation

54


 

and device manager, and OneView, our proprietary centralized project and administrative module for larger customers.
 
•  Extensive National Footprint with Regional Expertise. Our service centers maintain local customer relationships while benefiting from our centralized corporate functions and national scale. Each service center provides sophisticated, personalized services that are tailored to meet the regional needs of our customers. Our service facilities are organized as hub and satellite structures within individual markets, allowing us to balance production capacity and minimize capital expenditures through technology sharing among our service centers within each market. Our service centers are in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. This enables us to maintain our national “distribute and print” operations and allows our service facilities to act as backup and supply centers for the more than 1,560 facilities management programs we have in place at customer sites throughout the United States. We also leverage the geographic coverage of our production facilities to address the service needs of large companies that operate in multiple locations. Our Premier Accounts sales initiative offers regional and national customers our localized services under a single contract, while offering centralized access to project specific services, billing, and tracking information.
 
•  Flexible Operating Model. We are able to tailor our operations to meet the demands of the local markets that we serve by promoting regional decision making for marketing, pricing, and selling practices. In this manner, we remain responsive to our customers while benefiting from the cost structure advantages of our centralized administrative functions. Our flexible operating model also allows us to capitalize on an improving business environment. Capital investment for a new branch is modest and these new branches are expected to generate positive operating profit within 12 months from opening. The economies associated with opening a new branch give us flexibility and market response times that can significantly enhance our regional growth. We use our wide area network and management information systems to benchmark daily financial and operational data to help us identify and respond to changes in operating trends and disseminate best practices across all branches. We estimate that approximately 60% of our cost base is fixed and that the operating margin on our incremental revenue is more than two times our current operating margin. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2003, we achieved an operating margin of 15.0% and an EBITDA margin (exclusive of a one-time charge related to the early extinguishment of debt) of 19.7%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we experienced revenue growth of 5.6% compared to the same period in 2003, and achieved an operating margin of 17.7% and an EBITDA margin of 21.8%, resulting in margin improvement of approximately 2.7 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, demonstrating the leverage in our operating model in an expanding business environment.
 
•  Consistent, Strong Free Cash Flow. Through management of our inventory and receivables and our low capital expenditure requirements, we have consistently generated strong free cash flow (defined as operating cash flow less cash capital expenditures), regardless of recent industry and economic conditions. Our historical cash capital expenditures have been relatively low, with overall capital spending averaging approximately 1.5% of annual net sales over the last three years. In 2003, we generated free cash flow of $43.2 million. From the beginning of 2001 to the end of June 2004, we generated a cumulative $164.0 million of free cash flow.
 
•  Low Cost Operator. We believe we are one of the lowest cost operators in the reprographics industry, which we have accomplished by minimizing branch level expenses and capitalizing on our significant scale for purchasing efficiencies. As a result of our national presence and size, we enjoy significant economies of scale, and we receive favorable terms from major vendors of equipment, software and reprographics supplies, such as Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company, CDW Corporation, and Dell Inc. We also offer savings to other reprographers through our PEiR division, which allows members to purchase

55


 

machinery and supplies at lower prices than they could obtain independently while further increasing our purchasing power.
 
•  Experienced Management Team and Highly Trained Workforce. Our senior management team of S. “Mohan” Chandramohan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, K. “Suri” Suriyakumar, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Mark Legg, Chief Financial Officer, together with our divisional managers, has an average of over 20 years of industry experience. Mr. Chandramohan has been with us since February 1988 and Mr. Suriyakumar has been with us since November 1989. We have also successfully retained approximately 93% of the managers of the 80 businesses we have acquired since 1997. As a result of these acquisitions, we have developed a formalized training program that collects and disseminates best practices to our employees through formal instruction and seminars. The program covers all of our business practices, including general management, operations, sales and marketing, technology, human resources and accounting.

Our Business Strategy

       Our objective is to continue to strengthen our competitive position as the preferred provider of business-to-business document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We seek to strengthen this position while increasing revenue, cash flow, profitability, and market share. We believe our leadership position through our nationwide footprint, our continuous technological innovation, our promotion of PlanWell as the industry standard, and our value-added service offerings will allow us to continue to meet our objectives. Our key strategies to accomplish these objectives include:

•  Continue to Increase Our Market Penetration and Expand Our Nationwide Footprint. Through our technical and operational expertise and strong customer relationships, we expect to continue to penetrate key markets and build our nationwide presence. We believe that customers rely on local relationships for their document management services, and we intend to increase our existing presence in key U.S. markets while expanding into under-penetrated regions through facilities management contracts, targeted branch openings, strategic acquisitions, and national accounts.

  Õ   Facilities Management Contracts: We expect to capitalize on the continued trend of our customers to outsource their document management services, including their in-house operations. Our facilities management services are turnkey solutions to our customers that can transform what was a cost center for our customers into a profit center. Rather than absorbing the entire cost of such a facility, our customers receive an invoice from us based on their use which is typically reimbursable by project owners and developers. Since January 1, 2001, the number of our facilities management contracts has more than doubled. Based on the six months ended June 30, 2004, annualized net sales from these contracts have grown to $69.0 million. We will continue to concentrate on developing ongoing facilities management relationships in all of the markets we serve and building our base of recurring revenue.
 
  Õ   Targeted Branch Openings: Significant opportunities exist to expand our geographic coverage, capture new customers and increase our market share by opening additional satellite branches in regions near our established operations. Our strategy with respect to branch openings is in the early stages of implementation, having evolved as the next stage of our growth to complement our traditional acquisition strategy. Since September 2003, we have opened 15 new branches in areas that expand or further penetrate our existing markets and plan to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005. Capital investment for a new branch is modest and these new branches are expected to generate positive operating profit within 12 months from opening. We plan to open branches within our existing markets to serve new customers, in new markets to serve both existing and new customers, and in markets that have no ideal acquisition candidates or where potential

56


 

  acquisitions are likely to be too costly. We believe that our existing corporate infrastructure is capable of supporting a much larger branch network and significantly higher revenue.
 
  Õ   Strategic Acquisitions: Acquisitions have historically been an important component of our growth strategy. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 reprographics companies and have developed a structured approach to acquiring and integrating companies. We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our business further through disciplined, strategic acquisitions due to the fragmented nature of our industry. Because our industry consists primarily of small, privately-held companies that serve only local markets, we believe that we can continue to grow our business by successfully acquiring additional reprographics companies at reasonable prices and subsequently realizing substantial operating and purchasing synergies by leveraging our existing corporate infrastructure. We will continue to leverage our acquisition and integration expertise to expand into new markets and increase our presence in existing underpenetrated markets.
 
  Õ   National Accounts: Our Premier Accounts business unit offers a comprehensive suite of reprographics services designed to meet the demands of large regional and national businesses. It provides local reprographics services to national companies through our national network of reprographics service centers, while offering centralized access to project-specific services, billing and tracking information. For example, we recently entered into an exclusive Premier Accounts contract with one of the leading construction companies in the United States under which we offer a full range of document management, distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services on a national scale. This contract requires that the customer use PlanWell for every project, and the use of PlanWell by this customer’s contractors, subcontractors and outside work force should significantly improve the potential for revenue growth from this account. Through our extensive national footprint and industry leading technology, we believe that we are well-positioned to meet the demands of national companies and will continue to capture additional revenues and customers through this business unit.

•  Promote PlanWell as the Industry Standard for Procuring Reprographics Services Online. Our goal is to continue to expand market penetration of PlanWell and create a standardized, internet-based portal to manage, store, and retrieve documents. In order to increase market share and achieve industry standardization, we will continue to license our PlanWell technology to other reprographics companies, including members of PEiR. Through September 1, 2004, we have licensed PlanWell and our other technology products to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities across the United States. These efforts, combined with the strong functionality and growing capabilities of the PlanWell suite of products, should continue to position us at the forefront of technological innovation within the AEC and non-AEC reprographics markets, and create additional service and licensing revenue for us.
 
•  Expand Our Non-AEC and Ancillary Product and Service Offerings. We believe that offering our services to non-AEC customers and expanding our existing suite of product and service offerings are effective methods of increasing sales to both new and existing customers. We have leveraged our expertise in providing highly customized, quick-turn services to the AEC industry to attract customers from non-AEC industries that are increasingly seeking sophisticated document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We have been successful in attracting non-AEC customers that require services such as the production of large format and small format color and black and white documents, educational and training materials, short-run publishing products, and retail and promotional items. We began targeting non-AEC customers upon our conversion to digital technology in 1997, and we believe that our services to these customers accounted for approximately 20% of our year to date net sales.

In addition to expanding our non-AEC revenues, we continue to focus on creating new value-added services beyond traditional reprographics to offer all of our customers. We are actively engaged in

57


 

services such as bid facilitation, print network management for offices and on-site production facilities, and on-demand color publishing. We plan to continue to capitalize on our technological innovation to enhance our existing services and to create new reprographics technologies.

Our Services

       We provide business-to-business services to our customers in three key areas: document management, document distribution and logistics , and print-on-demand . These services are provided to our AEC industry customers, as well as to our customers in non-AEC industries that have similar document management and production requirements. Our AEC customers work primarily with high volumes of large format construction plans and small format specification documents that are technical, complex, constantly changing and frequently confidential. Our non-AEC customers generally require services that apply to black and white and color small format documents, promotional documents of all sizes, and the digital distribution of document files to multiple locations for a variety of print-on-demand needs including short-run digital publishing.

       We provide our business-to-business services through industry leading technology, a sophisticated network of 173 locally-branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs. These services include:

•  PlanWell, our proprietary, internet-based planroom launched in June 2000, and our suite of other reprographics software products that enable the online purchase and fulfillment of reprographics services. From Planwell’s inception in June 2000 through September 1, 2004, more than 650,000 orders have been placed through PlanWell online planrooms for the management of more than 54,000 projects and seven million complex, large format documents. While PlanWell typically facilitates the management of large and small format documents for professionals in the AEC industry, the application can be used to manage small format document collections and color documents for non-AEC users. PlanWell is provided in two primary configurations: PlanWell Enterprise , a hosted, comprehensive documentation system with a wide variety of administration and document management features; and PlanWell PDS, a simple, stand alone online planroom that acts as a document viewing and distribution tool for a single set of plans.
 
•  Production services, including print-on-demand, document assembly, document finishing, mounting, laminating, binding, and kitting. We utilize a broad range of digital output equipment and finishing and assembly skills to produce print-on-demand projects at each of our 173 service centers. These services include the production of large format and small format documents in both black and white and color. Documents can be digitally transferred from one service facility to another to balance production capacity or take advantage of a “distribute and print” operating system.
 
•  Document distribution and logistics, including the physical pick up, delivery, and shipping of time-sensitive, critical documents. These services are supported by a fleet of approximately 675 vehicles and nearly 700 employees. Our service facilities provide pedestrian, bicycle and car courier services in most metropolitan markets, and we also offer third party shipping services to all of our customers. Contracted courier services allow our divisions to manage additional delivery capacity through approximately 157 vehicles and drivers.
 
•  Highly customized large and small format reprographics in color and black and white. For our non-AEC customers this includes digital reproduction of posters, tradeshow displays, plans, banners, signage and maps. We offer large format color services through a variety of processes, including inkjet, bubblejet, large format electrostatic printing and photographic printing. We also offer small format color reprographics services, which typically use laser printing technology, for products such as flyers, real estate deal books and financial presentations.
 
•  Facilities management, including recurring on-site document management services and staffing at our customers’ locations. We currently have more than 1,560 facilities management programs,

58


 

which typically include the management and procurement of related on-site equipment and supplies. Our facilities management services generally eliminate reprographics capital expenditures for our customers and keep equipment current and in good condition. Our facilities management services also help our customers track and capture reprographics costs that are often reimbursable, and frequently transform a customer’s cost center into profit center.
 
•  Sales of reprographics equipment and supplies to other reprographics companies and end-users in the AEC industry to further complement our full range of service and product offerings and increase our purchasing power. In addition, a number of our service centers are authorized dealers for reprographics equipment manufactures such as Océ and Xerox. Sales of reprographics equipment and supplies accounted for over $40.7 million, or 9.8%, of our net sales in 2003.
 
•  The design and development of other document management and reprographics software, in addition to PlanWell, that supports ordering, tracking, job costing, and other customer specific accounting information for a variety of projects and services. Many of these applications create greater value and offer a wider range of services when used in conjunction with one another, providing an incentive to our customers to use our services beyond a single need. These proprietary applications include:

  Õ   Electronic Work Order (EWO), which offers our customers access to the services of all of our service centers through the internet. This application also offers the reprographer the ability to create internet-based order forms that conform to their available service offerings and pricing. Customers can use a simple upload application to send files to the reprographer or schedule a pickup for original documents. This application can also be configured to interface with other third party internet-based products, acting as the driving e-commerce engine for a reprographics organization.
 
  Õ   Abacus Print Cost Recovery (PCR) System, which provides a suite of software modules for reprographers and their customers to track documents produced from equipment installed as a part of a facilities management program.
 
  Õ   BidCaster “Invitation-to-Bid” (ITB) System, a data management internet application that issues customizable “invitations to bid” from a customer’s desktop using email and a hosted fax server. This application links potential bidders directly to a PlanWell online planroom to evaluate and order plans used in the submission of project bids, and tracks bid responses to provide the customer a much faster, convenient and efficient way to gather and complete project bids.
 
  Õ   MetaPrint Print Automation and Device Manager, a universal print driver that facilitates the printing of documents with output devices manufactured by multiple vendors, and allows the reprographer to print multiple documents in various formats as a single print submission.
 
  Õ   OneView Document Access and Customer Administration System, an internet-based application that leverages the security attributes of PlanWell to provide a single point of access to all of a customer’s project documents, regardless of which of our local production facilities stores the relevant documents. This application also imports and consolidates invoice data from each of our service centers in a variety of formats and reports.

       To further support and promote our core suite of services (document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand) , as well as lead our industry forward and establish ourselves firmly at the forefront of technology and innovation in the reprographics industry, we also:

•  License our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship online planroom, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. Our licensing efforts promote our technology as the digital standard for the fulfillment of reprographics services in the AEC industry. Through September 1, 2004, we have licensed PlanWell and our other technology products to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities across the United States.

59


 

•  Operate PEiR (Profit and Education in Reprographics), a trade organization wholly owned by us, through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers. PEiR members, currently consisting of 43 independent reprographers, are required to license PlanWell and may purchase equipment and supplies at a lower cost than they could obtain independently. In turn, their purchasing volumes increase our buying power and influence with our vendors. We also distribute our educational programs to PEiR members to help establish and promote best practices within the reprographics industry.

Customers and Representative Projects

       Our customers are both local and national companies, with no single customer accounting for more than 2% of our net sales in 2003.

       We have historically provided reprographics and related business services primarily to the AEC market. However, since 1997, we have focused on increasing the number of non-AEC customers in our customer base to increase diversification and expand our core services into markets that seek sophisticated document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We generated approximately 80% of our year to date net sales from AEC customers. We began targeting non-AEC customers upon our conversion to digital technology in 1997 and we believe that services to these customers accounted for approximately 20% of our year to date net sales.

Top 20 AEC Customers

       The following is a list of our top 20 AEC customers based upon year to date net sales through August 2004:

     
Anshen & Allen, Architects, Inc.
BSW Architects
EDAW, Inc.
Ewing Cole Cherry Brott
Gensler
Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.
Hillier International
The Irvine Company
KTGY Group, Inc.
MBH Architects, Inc.
  Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc.
Perini Corporation
RBF Consulting
Rockwell Group
Skanska USA Building Inc.
Skidmore Owens & Merrill LLP
Standard Pacific Corporation
The Turner Corporation
URS Corporation
Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo

Top 20 Non-AEC Customers

       The following is a list of our top 20 non-AEC customers based upon year to date net sales through August 2004:

     
Adac Laboratories, Inc.
AIM Management Group Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.
Baker Hughes Incorporated
The Boeing Company
Chevron Phillips Chemical
DBL Realtors Corp.
Etec Systems
Helix U.S.A. Ltd.
Lam Research Corporation
  Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works
NACE International
San Manuel Indian Bingo & Casino
Sound Transit
Southern California Edison
Staedtler, Inc.
Taco Bell Corp.
WDI/ Document Controls
Wells Fargo & Company
University of California, Los Angeles

60


 

Representative Projects

       The following is a representative list of recent small and large projects in which we supplied reprographics services:

           
Name of Project Architect Builder



Miami International Airport
  Corgan Associates, Inc.   The Turner Corporation
  North Terminal Development
(Miami, FL)
       
Walt Disney Concert Hall
  Frank O. Gehry & Associates, Inc.   M. A. Mortenson Company
  (Los Angeles, CA)        
University of Michigan
  Polshek Partnership Architects LLP   Skanska USA Building Inc.
  Biomedical Science Research Building
(Ann Arbor, MI)
       
Toyota Headquarters South
  LPA, Inc.   The Turner Corporation
  Campus Office Development
(Torrance, CA)
       
Bellagio Resort and Casino,
  Marnell Carrao Associates   Marnell Carrao Associates
  Sam’s Town Gambling Hall
(Las Vegas, NV)
       
FDA Regional Laboratory-Southwest
(Irvine, CA)
  Zimmer, Gunsul, Frasca Partnership + HDR   Hensel Phelps
Fluor Corporation Campus
  Fluor Corporation   Fluor Corporation
  Headquarters (Irvine, CA)        
City of Aliso Viejo
  Multiple   Multiple
  Masterplan (Aliso Viejo, CA)        
Minutemaid Park (Houston, TX)
  HOK Sport + Venue + Event   Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR)
Chesapeake Bay Bridge
  PCL Civil Constructors Inc.   Multiple
  Tunnel (Virginia Beach, VA)        
Caltrans District 7
  Morphosis Architects   Clark Construction Group, LLC
  Headquarters
(Los Angeles, CA)
       
Norman Mineta San Jose
  Gensler   Gilbane Building Company
  International Airport (San Jose, CA)        
Nissan Automotive Assembly
  SSOE, Inc.   W.G. Yates & Sons
  Facility (Canton, MS)       Construction Co.,
Yates/ Walbridge

61


 

Operations

       Geographic Presence. We operate 173 reprographics service centers, including 170 service centers in 133 cities in 29 states throughout the United States and three service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. Our reprographics service centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. The map below illustrates the number of our service centers by state.

(GEOGRAPHIC PRESENCE MAP)

       Hub and Satellite Configuration. We are organized into 42 divisions that typically consist of a cluster configuration of at least one large service facility, or hub facility, and several smaller facilities, or satellite facilities, that are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide all of our services both locally and nationwide. Our hub and satellite configuration enables us to shorten our customers’ document processing and distribution time, as well as achieve higher utilization of output devices by coordinating the distribution of work orders digitally among our service centers. In addition, this organizational structure allows us to balance production capacity, improve equipment utilization, and minimize capital expenditures through technology sharing among our service centers within each market. The hub and satellite model supports our ability to respond to the demands of local markets by promoting regional decision making for marketing, pricing, and selling practices while benefiting from centralized administrative functions.

62


 

Overview of Typical Hub and Satellite Capabilities

     
Central Hub Facilities Satellite Facilities


• All capabilities and equipment of our satellite facilities
  • Process simple reprographics
• Process larger, more complex reprographics
  • Quick turnaround capabilities
• Higher production capacity
  • Sophisticated equipment
• Manage facilities management programs
  • Responsive, localized service
• Back-up support to satellite facilities
  • Local delivery service
    • Light production capacity
    • Finishing services

•  Central Hub Facilities. In each of our major markets, we operate one or more large scale full service facilities that have high production capacity and sophisticated equipment. These larger facilities offer specialized services such as laser digital imaging on photographic material, large format color printing, and finishing services that may not be economically viable for smaller facilities to provide. Each central hub facility also maintains a library of design and imaging software, including architectural software, to process customer orders in digital format. In addition, digital equipment at all of our service facilities is networked, allowing a single order to be processed simultaneously on multiple pieces of equipment. These facilities also offer customers access to PlanWell, as well as document storage and retrieval services. Our central hub facilities also coordinate our facilities management programs.
 
•  Satellite Facilities. To supplement the capabilities of our central hub facilities, we operate satellite facilities that are typically located closer to our customers than the central hubs. Our satellite facilities have quick turnaround capabilities, responsive, localized service, and handle the majority of digital processes. By utilizing a fleet of approximately 675 vehicles and nearly 700 employees, together with approximately 157 vehicles and drivers from contracted courier services for additional flexible capacity, these satellite facilities interact directly with customers and our central hub facilities to provide customers with a full range of high quality, on-demand reprographics services. In addition, our delivery fleet enables the smaller satellite facilities to coordinate with each other to reduce turnaround time for customers by evenly distributing work orders. The smaller satellite centers also typically provide digital black and white printing and imaging, color printing and limited finishing services.

       Management Systems and Controls. We operate our business under a dual operating structure of centralized administrative functions and regional decision making. Acquired companies typically retain their local business identities, managers, sales force, and marketing efforts in order to maintain strong local relationships. Our local management maintains autonomy over the day-to-day operations of their business units, including profitability, customer billing, receivables collection, and service mix decisions. We believe that this decentralized and entrepreneurial approach to our operations is essential in capitalizing on our managers’ knowledge of local markets and long established customer relationships.

       Although we operate on a decentralized basis, our senior management closely monitors and reviews each of our 42 divisions through daily reports that contain operating and financial information such as sales, inventory levels, purchasing commitments, collections, and receivables. In addition, our operating divisions submit monthly reports to senior management that track each division’s financial and operating performance in comparison to monthly budgets.

Suppliers and Vendors

       We purchase raw materials, consisting primarily of paper, toner, and other consumables, and purchase or lease reprographics equipment. To minimize our materials cost, we maintain a paper

63


 

converting operation whereby we purchase rolls of paper directly from paper mills that are cut to size and used in our operations, as well as sold to our customers. Our reprographics equipment, which includes imaging and printing equipment, is typically leased for use in our service facilities and facilities management sites. We use a two-tiered approach to purchasing in order to maximize the economies associated with our size, while maintaining the local efficiencies and time sensitivity required to meet customer demands. We continually monitor market conditions and product developments, as well as regularly review the contractual terms of our national purchasing agreements, to take advantage of our buying power and to maximize the benefits associated with these agreements.

       Our primary vendors of equipment, maintenance services and reprographics supplies include Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., and Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company. We have long standing relationships with all of our suppliers and we believe we receive favorable prices as compared to our competition due to the large quantities we purchase and strong relationships with our vendors. We have entered into annual supply contracts with certain vendors to guarantee prices. Significant market fluctuations in our raw material costs have historically been limited to paper prices and we have typically maintained strong gross margins as the result of our ability to pass increased material costs through to our customers.

Sales and Marketing

       Divisional Sales Force. We market our products and services throughout the United States through localized sales forces and marketing efforts at the divisional level. We had approximately 270 sales and customer service representatives as of September 1, 2004. Each sales force generally consists of a sales manager and a staff of between two to 12 sales and customer service representatives that target various customer segments. Depending on the size of the operating division, a sales team may serve both the central hub service facility and satellite facilities, or if market demographics require, operate on behalf of a single service facility.

       Our sales associates have been trained in our entire portfolio of services. They are in close contact with the local business community and offer our portfolio of services to customers in a variety of local industries in both the AEC and non-AEC markets.

       In most locations, we follow a customized sales approach to the market that is dependent on the distinctive trade practices of the region. For example, in some major metropolitan markets, architects exert controlling influence over the management of construction projects, whereas in other markets, general contractors have greater control. We believe our strong connections to AEC and general business communities and our long operating history provide us with the insight and understanding to effectively address regionally focused trade practices through our targeted sales efforts.

       Premier Accounts. To further enhance our strong market share and service portfolio on a national level, we operate a “Premier Accounts” business unit. Designed to meet the requirements of large regional or national businesses, we established this operating division to take advantage of growing globalization within the AEC market, and to establish ourselves at the corporate level as the leading national reprographer with extensive geographic and service capabilities. The “Premier Accounts” sales initiative allows us to attract large AEC and non-AEC companies with document management, distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand needs that span wide geographical or organizational boundaries. Since its launch in the middle of 2003, we have established six national accounts through Premier Accounts, including our most recent exclusive contract with one of the leading construction companies in the United States.

       PEiR Group. We established the PEiR Group (Profit and Education in Reprographics) in July 2003, a separate operating division of our company that is a membership-based organization for the reprographics industry. Comprised of independent reprographers and reprographics vendors, its mission is to “create a large, unified group of successful independent reprographers able to advance

64


 

the industry by improving the profitability, productivity and professionalism of its members.” PEiR members are required to license our PlanWell online planroom application, facilitating the promotion of our technology as the industry standard. We also provide general purchasing discounts to PEiR members through our preferred vendors. This provides other reprographics companies the opportunity to purchase equipment and supplies at a lower cost than they could obtain independently, while increasing our influence and purchasing power with our vendors. Through PEiR, we also present educational programs to members to establish and promote best practices within the industry.

Competition

       According to the IRgA, most firms in the U.S. reprographics services industry are small, privately held entrepreneurial businesses. The larger reprographers in the United States include Service Point USA, a subsidiary of Service Point Solutions, S.A., Thomas Reprographics, Inc., ABC Imaging, LLC, and National Reprographics Inc. While we have no nationwide competitors, we do compete at the local level with a number of privately held reprographics companies, commercial printers, digital imaging firms, and to a limited degree, retail copy shops. Competition is primarily based on customer service, technological leadership, product performance and price. We believe that the scale and scope of our operations are distinct competitive advantages that differentiate us from our competitors. See “Risk Factors — Competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors may hinder our ability to execute our business strategy and maintain our profitability.”

Research and Development

       We believe that to compete effectively we must continue to invest in research and development of our services. Our research and development efforts are focused on improving and enhancing PlanWell as well as developing new proprietary services. As of September 1, 2004, we employed approximately 20 engineers and technical specialists with expertise in software, internet-based applications, database management, internet security and quality assurance. Cash outlays for research and development which include both capitalized and expensed items amounted to $2.5 million in 2001, $2.7 million in 2002, $2.8 million in 2003, and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Proprietary Rights

       Our success depends on our proprietary information and technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, license agreements, nondisclosure and noncompete agreements, reseller agreements, customer contracts, and technical measures to establish and protect our rights in our proprietary technology. Our PlanWell license agreements grant our customers a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to use our products and receive our services and contain terms and conditions prohibiting the unauthorized reproduction or transfer of our services. We retain all title and rights of ownership in our software products. In addition, we enter into agreements with some of our employees, third-party consultants and contractors that prohibit the disclosure or use of our confidential information and require the assignment to us of any new ideas, developments, discoveries or inventions related to our business. We also require other third parties to enter into nondisclosure agreements that limit use of, access to, and distribution of our proprietary information. We also rely on a variety of technologies that are licensed from third parties to perform key functions.

       We have registered “PlanWell” as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and have applied for registration in Canada, Australia and the European Union. Additionally, we have applied to register the trademark “PlanWell PDS” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in Canada, Australia and the European Union. We do not have any other trademarks, service marks or patents that are material to our business.

65


 

       For a discussion of the risks associated with our proprietary rights, see “Risk Factors — Our failure to adequately protect the proprietary aspects of our technology, including PlanWell, may cause us to lose market share” and “Risk Factors — Our intellectual property rights may be subject to the rights of third parties.”

Information Technology

       We operate two technology centers in Silicon Valley to support our reprographics services. Our second technology center was recently opened to accommodate the continuing growth of our digital operations, and to provide redundancy for our critical equipment and communication infrastructure. Our technology centers also serve as design and development facilities for our software applications, and house our nationwide database administration team and networking engineers.

       From these technology centers, our technical staff is able to remotely manage, control and troubleshoot the primary databases and connectivity of each of our 42 operating divisions. This allows us to avoid the costs and expenses of employing costly database administrators and network engineers in each of our service facilities.

       All of our reprographics service centers are connected via a high performance, dedicated wide area network (WAN), with additional capacity and connectivity through a virtual private network (VPN) to handle customer data transmissions and e-commerce transactions. Our technology centers are standardized on HP/Compaq ProLiant TM Servers and Microsoft Window 2000 Enterprise Server software. Our technology centers use both commonly available software and custom applications running in a clustered computing environment and employ industry leading technologies for redundancy, backup and security.

       We apply the extensive industry knowledge and experience of the managers of our acquired reprographics companies to our technology development in order to create solutions that are immediately practical to reprographers and their customers.

       We employ advanced digital technology to improve processes, reduce costs, and increase our efficiency. We have built our technology infrastructure in a manner which provides us with engineering talent, development tools, and powerful computing resources while carefully managing our costs.

Employees

       As of September 1, 2004, we had over 3,450 employees. Approximately 27 of our employees are covered by two collective agreements. The collective bargaining agreement with our subsidiary, Ridgway’s Ltd., expires on November 30, 2007 and the agreement with our subsidiary, B.P. Independent Reprographics, Inc., expires on December 4, 2006, but will continue thereafter from year to year unless either party terminates the agreement. We have not experienced a work stoppage during the past five years and believe that our relationships with our employees and collective bargaining units are good.

Facilities

       We currently operate 180 production facilities, including five production support facilities and our two technology centers in Fremont, California, totaling approximately 1,343,057 square feet. We have five administrative facilities, totaling approximately 25,082 square feet. Our executive offices are located in Glendale, California.

66


 

       The table below lists our facilities by region, type of facility, number of facilities and square footage as of September 1, 2004.

                               
Number of Number of
Administrative Square Production Square
Region Facilities Footage Facilities(1) Footage(1)





Southern California
  1     7,183       37       307,605  
Northern California
  1     4,659       34       264,146  
Pacific Northwest
  0     0       9       96,640  
Northeast
  3     13,240       33       193,560  
Southern
  0     0       42       284,281  
Midwest
  0     0       25 (2)     196,825  
   
   
     
     
 
 
Total
  5     25,082       180       1,343,057  


(1)  Includes five production support facilities and our two technology centers in Fremont, California.
 
(2)  Includes our three service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area.

       We lease 168 of our production facilities, each of our administrative facilities and both of our technology centers. These leases generally expire between 2005 and 2009. Substantially all of the leases contain renewal provisions with automatic rent escalation clauses. The owned facilities are subject to major encumbrances under our credit facilities. In addition to the facilities that are owned, our fixed assets are comprised primarily of machinery and equipment, trucks, and computer equipment.

Legal Proceedings

       We are a creditor and participant in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy of Louis Frey Company, Inc., or LF Co., which is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. We managed LF Co. under a contract from May through September of 2003. LF Co. filed for Bankruptcy protection in August 2003, and the proceeding was converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation in October 2003. On or about June 30, 2004, the Bankruptcy Estate Trustee filed a complaint in the LF Co. Bankruptcy proceeding against us, which was amended on or about July 19, 2004, alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties, conversion, unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract, unfair competition and false commercial promotion in violation of The Lanham Act, misappropriation of trade secrets and fraud regarding our handling of the assets of LF Co. The Trustee claims damages of not less than $9.5 million, as well as punitive damages and treble damages with respect to the Lanham Act claims. Previously, on or about October 10, 2003, a secured creditor of LF Co., Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc., or Merrill, had filed a complaint in the LF Co. Bankruptcy proceeding against us, which was most recently amended on or about July 6, 2004. Merrill’s claims are duplicated in the Trustee’s suit. We, in turn, have filed answers and counterclaims denying liability to the Trustee and seeking reimbursement of all costs and damages sustained as a result of the Trustee’s actions and in our efforts to assist LF Co. Discovery has commenced and is ongoing in each of these cases. We believe that we have meritorious defenses as well as substantial counterclaims against Merrill Lynch and the Trustee. We intend to vigorously contest the above matters. Based on the discovery and depositions to date, we do not believe that the outcome of the above matters will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

       We are involved in various legal proceedings and other legal matters from time to time in the normal course of business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

67


 

Environmental and Regulatory Considerations

       Our property consists principally of reprographics and related production equipment and we lease substantially all of our production and administrative facilities. We are not aware of any environmental liabilities which would have a material impact on our operations and financial condition.

68


 

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

       The following table sets forth the name, age and position of the persons who will be our directors and executive officers as of the date of the completion of the offering.

             
Name Age Position



Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan
    45     Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board of Directors
Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar
    51     President; Chief Operating Officer; Director
Mark W. Legg
    49     Chief Financial Officer; Secretary
Rahul K. Roy
    45     Chief Technology Officer
Andrew W. Code
    46     Director
Thomas J. Formolo
    40     Director
Manuel Perez de la Mesa
    47     Director

       Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of our board of directors. A brief biography of each person who will serve as a director or executive officer upon consummation of this offering follows below. Prior to our conversion from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, each officer served Holdings in the capacities discussed below.

       Sathiyamurthy (“Mohan”) Chandramohan has served as an advisor and the Chairman of the Board of Advisors of Holdings since March 1998 and has served as a director and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Chandramohan joined Micro Device, Inc. (our predecessor company) in February 1988 as President and became the Chief Executive Officer in March 1991. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Chandramohan was employed with U-Save Auto Parts Stores from December 1981 to February 1988, and became the company’s Chief Financial Officer in May 1985 and Chief Operating Officer in March 1987. Mr. Chandramohan served as the President of the International Reprographics Association (IRgA) from August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2002 and continues to be an active member of the IRgA.

       Kumarakulasingam (“Suri”) Suriyakumar has served as an advisor of Holdings since March 1998 and has served as a director of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Suriyakumar joined Micro Device, Inc. in 1989. He became the Vice President of Micro Device, Inc. in 1990 and became the company’s President and Chief Operating Officer in 1991. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Suriyakumar was employed with Aitken Spence & Co. LTD, a highly diversified conglomerate and one of the five largest corporations in Sri Lanka. Mr. Suriyakumar is an active member of the IRgA.

       Mark W. Legg joined Holdings as its Chief Financial Officer in April 1998. From 1987 to 1998, Mr. Legg was employed at Vivitar Corporation, a distributor of photographic, optical, electronic and digital imaging products, as a Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer, and later as its Chief Operating Officer. Before Vivitar, he was director of corporate accounting at Sunrise Medical from 1984 to 1986. From 1979 to 1984, Mr. Legg was employed as an accountant with Price Waterhouse & Co.

       Rahul K. Roy joined Holdings as our Chief Technology Officer in September 2000. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Roy was the Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of MirrorPlus Technologies, Inc., which developed software for the reprographics industry, from August 1993 until it was acquired by us in 1999. Mr. Roy served as the Chief Operating Officer of InPrint, a provider of printing, software, duplication, packaging, assembly and distribution services to technology companies, from 1993 until it was acquired by us in 1999.

69


 

       Andrew W. Code has served as an advisor of Holdings since May 2002 and has served as a director of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Code is a partner of CHS and founded its predecessors in 1988. Mr. Code is also a director of SCP Pool Corporation.

       Thomas J. Formolo has served as an advisor of Holdings since April 2000 and has served as a director of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Formolo has been a partner of CHS since 1997 and employed by its affiliates since 1990.

       Manuel Perez de la Mesa functioned as a director for Holdings from July 2002 until his appointment as a director of American Reprographics Company in October 2004. Mr. Perez de la Mesa has been Chief Executive Officer of SCP Pool Corporation, a wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies and related equipment, since May 2001 and has also been the President of SCP Pool Corporation since February 1999. Mr. Perez de la Mesa served as Chief Operating Officer of SCP Pool Corporation from February 1999 to May 2001.

Board Composition

       Prior to our reorganization to a Delaware corporation, we were governed under the direction of a board of advisors, consisting of Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar, Code, Formolo and Marcus J. George, a managing director of CHS. In connection with our reorganization from a limited liability company to a corporation, we have established a board of directors consisting initially of Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar, Code, Formolo, and Perez, who are listed above.

       In addition, in order to ensure compliance with the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, the composition of the board of directors may change prior to and following this offering. It is our intention to be in full and timely compliance with all applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange and applicable law, including with respect to the independence of our directors. As discussed in greater detail below, we intend to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the New York Stock Exchange rules which require that, among other things, our audit committee include at least a majority of independent directors within 90 days after the effective date of our registration statement. In addition, within one year after such effectiveness, our audit committee must consist entirely of independent directors.

       The board has determined that Mr. Perez is an independent director under the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange. No later than one year after the completion of this offering, we will satisfy the requirements for independent directors contained in the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange through the appointment of three additional independent directors, one of whom will replace one of the five current directors, resulting in a board consisting of seven members, four of whom will be independent.

       In accordance with the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be filed prior to the completion of this offering, the board of directors will be elected annually. There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of our company.

Board Compensation

       Except for reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses relating to attendance at board meetings and the grant of stock options, employee directors are not compensated for their services as directors. Directors who are not our employees receive cash compensation for their services as directors at a rate of $90,000 per year ($50,000 of which will be payable through annual grants of nonstatutory stock options under our 2005 Stock Plan). In addition, directors who are not our employees will receive $5,000 per year for duties as committee chair. Directors who are our employees are eligible to participate in our 2005 Stock Option Plan and, beginning in 2005, they will also be eligible to participate in our 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. See “— Benefit Plans.”

70


 

Board Committees

Audit Committee

       Presently, our audit committee consists of Messrs. Perez,                     and                     . Mr. Perez is an audit committee financial expert and is an independent audit committee member. Our audit committee must have at least one independent member at the time our registration statement becomes effective, as required by the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The audit committee must have a majority of independent members within 90 days after the effective date of our registration statement and the entire audit committee must consist of independent members within one year after the effective date of our registration statement, one of which must be a financial expert. The audit committee will comply with all of the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

       Our audit committee is responsible for reviewing the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls; reviewing the results of the independent accountants’ annual audit, including any significant adjustments, management judgments and estimates, new accounting policies and disagreements with management; reviewing our audited financial statements and discussing the statements with management; reviewing the audit reports submitted by the independent accountants; reviewing disclosures by independent accountants concerning relationships with our company and the performance of our independent accountants and annually recommending independent accountants; and preparing such reports or statements as may be required by securities laws.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

       We do not currently have a nominating committee. The responsibilities of a nominating committee have been assumed by our board of directors. Following the completion of this offering, we will have a corporate governance and nominating committee and anticipate that it will consist of individuals who meet the independence requirements established by the New York Stock Exchange. The corporate governance and nominating committee will, among other things, identify individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors, select or recommend to the board of directors the nominees to stand for election as directors and develop and recommend to the board of directors a set of corporate governance principles. The corporate governance and nominating committee will be governed by a charter that complies with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

Compensation Committee

       We do not currently have a compensation committee. The responsibilities of a compensation committee have been assumed by our board of directors. Following the completion of this offering, we anticipate that our compensation committee will consist of individuals meeting the independence requirements established by the New York Stock Exchange. The compensation committee will, among other things, review, approve and make determinations concerning our compensation practices, policies and procedures for the members of senior management. The compensation committee will be governed by a charter that complies with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

       During 2003, our entire board of advisors, consisting of Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar, Code, Formolo, and George, determined executive compensation. We did not have a compensation committee apart from the board of advisors. During 2003, Mr. Chandramohan served as our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Suriyakumar served as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

       Messrs. Code and Formolo, both members of our board of directors, are affiliated with CHS Management IV, L.P. We are party to a management agreement with CHS Management IV, L.P.,

71


 

pursuant to which CHS Management IV, L.P. has agreed to provide certain consulting services to us. The management agreement will be terminated upon the consummation of this offering.

       Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar, both members of our board of advisors, are affiliated with Sumo Holdings LA, LLC, Sumo Holdings San Jose, LLC, Sumo Holdings Irvine, LLC, Sumo Holdings Sacramento, LLC, Sumo Holdings Maryland, LLC, and Sumo Holdings Costa Mesa, LLC, each of which are parties to various real property leases with our subsidiaries relating to our facilities.

       For a further description of the transactions between the members of our board of directors, their affiliates and us, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Executive Compensation

       The compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and the only other executive officers who received compensation in excess of $100,000 for services in all capacities to our company and our subsidiaries during 2003 is set forth below. We did not grant any options or membership unit appreciation rights, restricted units or long-term incentive plan, or LTIP, awards to our executive officers during 2003.

Summary Compensation Table

                                   
Annual Compensation

Other Annual All Other
Name and Principal Position Salary Bonus Compensation(1) Compensation





S. Chandramohan
  $ 600,000     $     $ 52,150 (2)   $ 288 (3)
  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer                                
K. Suriyakumar
    600,000             65,527 (4)     288 (3)
  President, Chief Operating Officer and Director                                
Mark W. Legg
    200,000       387,000             1,288 (5)
  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary                                
Rahul Roy
    360,000                   2,688 (6)
  Chief Technology Officer                                


(1)  Certain personal benefits provided by us to the named executive officers are not included in the above table as permitted by the SEC regulations because the aggregate amount of such personal benefits for each named executive officer in each year reflected in the table did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the sum of such officer’s salary and bonus in each respective year.
 
(2)  Includes $47,770 for automobile lease payments.
 
(3)  Consists of premiums for life insurance.
 
(4)  Consists of automobile lease payments.
 
(5)  Consists of $288 of premiums for life insurance and $1,000 paid by us as the employer match under our 401(k) plan.
 
(6)  Consists of $288 of premiums for life insurance and $2,400 paid by us as the employer match under our 401(k) plan.

72


 

Option Grants During the Year Ended December 31, 2003

       During 2003, no options to purchase any shares of common stock were granted to the named executive officers listed in the above Summary Compensation Table. None of such persons received awards of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or LTIP awards during 2003.

Aggregated Option Exercises During the Year Ended December 31, 2003 and Value of Options Held at December 31, 2003

       The following table provides summary information concerning the shares of common stock acquired in 2003, the value realized upon exercise of stock options in 2003, and the year end number and value of unexercised options with respect to each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2003. The value was calculated by determining the difference between the fair market value of underlying securities and the exercise price. The fair market value of our common stock at December 31, 2003 was assumed to be $          per share.

Fiscal Year-End Option Values

                                 
Number of
Securities Value of
Underlying Unexercised
Unexercised in-the-Money
Options at Options at
FY-End(#) FY-End($)
Shares

Acquired on Value Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Name Exercise(#) Realized($) Unexercisable Unexercisable





S. Chandramohan
                       
K. Suriyakumar
                       
Mark W. Legg
                       
Rahul Roy
                420,000/280,000       /  

       During 2004, we granted Mr. Legg an option to purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.62 per share, and granted Mr. Roy an option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.85 per share.

Employment Agreements

       We had an agreement with each of Mr. Chandramohan and Mr. Suriyakumar that expired in December 2002. These agreements provided that, at the closing of an acquisition, each would be paid in cash a fee equal to one percent (1%) of the aggregate consideration paid by us in connection with the acquisition (including, without limitation, all interest bearing obligations assumed, the deferred purchase price of property or assets, all non-compete, consulting, employment or lease arrangements and similar forms of consideration). For purposes of these agreements with Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar, “acquisition” was defined as an acquisition by us of all or substantially all of the outstanding capital stock or of all or substantially all of the assets and business of any person, division or any similar business unit of any person. Since the expiration of these agreements, we have continued to pay Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar acquisition bonuses in accordance with the agreements. These payments will be discontinued upon the consummation of this offering. We intend to enter into new employment agreements with each of our executive officers that will be effective upon the consummation of this offering.

       We have entered into a 2004 Bonus Plan with Mr. Legg that provides for the payment to Mr. Legg of (1) a bonus of up to $300,000 based on the financial results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 of three divisions specified in the Bonus Plan (up to $100,000 bonus per division), (2) a bonus of $100,000 for the repayment of no less than $30,700,000 of bank debt by December 31, 2004 (subject to increase for repayments of bank debt above this amount), and (3) a

73


 

bonus of $100,000 for the achievement of 100% of divisional cash flow divided by divisional earnings before depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2004 (subject to increases of $25,000 for each percentage point over 100%). Under the Bonus Plan, Mr. Legg is not eligible to receive any of the bonus payments described above if our EBIT margin is equal to or less than 10% for the year ended December 31, 2004. In that situation, our CEO will determine the appropriate bonus based upon his evaluation of Mr. Legg’s performance. In accordance with the 2004 Bonus Plan, $210,000 of the bonus was paid in advance on July 31, 2004, with the balance to be paid on February 15, 2005.

Benefit Plans

American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C. Unit Option Plan II

       On January 1, 2001, Holdings adopted the American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C. Unit Option Plan II, or Unit Plan, under which selected employees, independent advisors, members of the board of advisors of Holdings (or any subsidiary) or members of the board of directors of any subsidiary may be granted common unit options. The members of Holdings approved the Unit Plan on December 22, 2000. Under the Unit Plan, 1,735,415 shares of Holdings’ plan member common units have been reserved for the grant of options. As of December 31, 2003, options to purchase a total of 1,446,000 plan member common units were outstanding under the Unit Plan. The exercise price of the units is to be determined by the board of advisors, provided, however, that the option price is not to be less than 85% of the fair market value of such unit at the time such option is granted, or, in the case of a person who owns units possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all units of Holdings, 110% of the fair market value of such unit at the time such option is granted. For purposes of the Unit Plan, the term “fair market value” means the fair market value of a unit determined as of any particular date by the board of advisors, on a fully diluted basis assuming the exercise or conversion of all then exercisable options, warrants, and other rights to purchase units and, to the extent that the board of advisors in its discretion determines to be appropriate, the exercise or conversion of such options, warrants, and other rights to purchase units that are not then exercisable or convertible.

       Holdings’ board of advisors is to determine the vesting period of each option at the date of the grant, provided, however, that except for options granted to officers or consultants, or officers, directors or consultants of any of Holdings’ subsidiaries, each option shall become exercisable at no lesser rate than 20% for each full year elapsed after the grant of the option and on or before termination of service as an employee until fully exercisable. Upon termination of employment, Holdings and an affiliate of Holdings, ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., have the right to redeem the options. On July 1, 2003, Holdings amended the Unit Plan to extend the exercise period and vesting period for certain optionholders, provided (a) the optionholder had been employed by Holdings or any of its subsidiaries for a period of at least 10 years, (b) the optionholder was at least 55 years old on the date of termination, and (c) the optionholder’s service with Holdings and any of its subsidiaries terminated because of his or her retirement or any other voluntary reason other than his or her death or permanent disability. If an optionholder satisfies the aforementioned criteria, Holdings may elect to treat the portion of the option that was exercisable on the date of such termination of employment as exercisable by the optionholder until such time that he or she chose to “compete” (as defined in the Unit Plan) with Holdings or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, as long as the optionholder did not compete with Holdings or any of its subsidiaries, the option would continue to vest according to the Unit Plan and the applicable option agreement.

       Upon completion of this offering, members of Holdings will exchange their outstanding options granted under the Unit Plan for options under our 2005 Stock Plan exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings option and with the same exercise price and vesting terms as the Holdings option and all outstanding options under the Unit Plan will be canceled. The Unit Plan will be terminated prior to the completion of this offering, and no additional options will be granted under the Unit Plan.

74


 

2005 Stock Plan

       We will adopt the American Reprographics Company 2005 Stock Plan, and obtain stockholder approval of the plan, prior to the completion of this offering. Upon our reorganization, all outstanding options under our Unit Option Plan will be canceled in exchange for an option under our 2005 Stock Plan exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings option and with the same exercise price and vesting terms as the Holdings option. The 2005 Stock Plan will be administered by our compensation committee.

       Type of Awards. The 2005 Stock Plan provides for the discretionary grant after the consummation of this offering of incentive stock options (within the provisions of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code) to employees, including officers and employee directors, and for the discretionary grant of nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, and stock appreciation rights to employees, directors and consultants. No person may be granted options or stock appreciation rights under the 2005 Stock Plan covering more than 500,000 shares of common stock in any calendar year.

       Reservation of Shares. The total shares of common stock currently reserved and authorized for issuance under the 2005 Stock Plan equals 5,000,000 shares of common stock. This authorization shall automatically increase annually on the first day of our fiscal year, from 2006 through and including 2010, by the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the outstanding shares on the date of the increase; (ii) 300,000 shares; or (iii) such smaller number of shares determined by our board of directors. The board may elect to increase, with stockholder approval, or reduce the number of additional shares authorized in any given year. In the event of a stock split or other alteration in our capital structure, appropriate adjustments will be made to the authorized shares and outstanding awards to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights.

       Administration. Our compensation committee, which generally administers the 2005 Stock Plan, has the authority to determine the terms of the options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, or stock appreciation rights granted, including the exercise price of the option or purchase price for a restricted stock grant or restricted stock unit; the number of shares subject to each option or restricted stock grant or the number of restricted stock units or stock appreciation rights; the vesting and exercise forms of each award; and the form of consideration payable upon the exercise of each option or stock purchase right.

       Nonassignability. Generally, options, restricted stock or other awards granted under our 2005 Stock Plan are not transferable by the participant, and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the participant and only by such participant.

       Stock Options. The exercise price of nonstatutory stock options and stock purchase rights granted under the 2005 Stock Plan is determined by the compensation committee. With respect to nonstatutory stock options intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Generally, the exercise price of all incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. With respect to any participant who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of our outstanding capital stock, the exercise price of any incentive stock option granted must at least equal 110% of the fair market value on the grant date and the term of such incentive stock option must not exceed five years. The term of all other options granted under the 2005 Stock Plan may not exceed 10 years. Options granted under the 2005 Stock Plan vest at the rate specified in the option agreement. Unless the terms of an optionholder’s stock option agreement provide for earlier or later termination, if an optionholder’s service with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases due to disability or death, the optionholder, or his or her beneficiary, may exercise any vested options up to 12 months, or 18 months in the event of death, after the date such service ends. If an optionholder’s service with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases without cause for any reason other than disability or death, the optionholder may exercise any vested options up to three

75


 

months from cessation of service, unless the terms of the stock option agreement provide for earlier or later termination. If an optionholder’s service with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases with cause, the option will terminate at the time such service ceases. In no event may an option be exercised after its expiration date.

       Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock awards granted under the 2005 Stock Plan may be either in the form of a restricted stock purchase right, giving the participant a right to immediately purchase common stock, or in the form of a restricted stock award, for which the participant will be required to furnish consideration in the form of services to us (in consideration for past services to us). The purchase price shall be determined by the committee and may be less than the current fair market value of the common stock. Restricted stock awards may be subject to vesting conditions based upon such services to be rendered as specified by the committee, and the shares acquired may not be transferred by the participant until vested. If a restricted stock award recipient’s service with us, or any affiliate of ours, terminates, we may reacquire all of the shares of our common stock issued to the recipient pursuant to a restricted stock award which have not vested as of the date of termination. Participants holding restricted stock will be permitted to vote the shares and receive any dividends paid in cash.

       Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock units granted under the 2005 Stock Plan represent a right to receive payment for units in the form or cash or shares of our common stock at a future date determined in accordance with the participant’s award agreement. The consideration for a restricted stock unit award may be payable in any form permitted under applicable laws. Restricted stock unit awards shall be granted subject to vesting conditions as determined by the compensation committee. Participants have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends with respect to restricted stock unit awards until shares of common stock are issued in settlement of such awards. However, the compensation committee may grant restricted stock units that entitle their holders to receive dividend equivalents, which are rights to receive additional restricted stock units for a number of shares whose value is equal to any cash dividends we pay. If a restricted stock unit award recipient’s service with us, or any affiliate of ours, terminates, any unvested portion of the restricted stock unit award is forfeited upon the recipient’s termination of service.

       Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right provides a participant the right to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common stock between the date of grant of the award and the date of its exercise. We may pay the appreciation either in cash or in shares of our common stock. We may pay cash payments in a lump sum, or we may defer payment in accordance with the terms of the participant’s award agreement. Stock appreciation rights vest and become exercisable at the times and on the terms established by the compensation committee. The maximum term of any stock appreciation right is 10 years. If a stock appreciation right recipient’s service with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases for any reason, the recipient may exercise any vested stock appreciation right up to three months from cessation of service, unless the terms of the stock appreciation right agreement provide for earlier or later termination.

       Non-Employee Director Awards. Commencing with our first annual meeting of stockholders (on or after the effective date of this offering), each non-employee director automatically will receive a nonstatutory stock option with a fair market value, as determined under the Black-Scholes option pricing formula, equal to $50,000 (or 55.56%) of such non-employee director’s annual cash compensation (exclusive of committee fees). Each nonstatutory stock option will cover his or her service since either the previous annual meeting or the date on which he or she was first elected or appointed.

       Corporate Transactions and Change in Control. In the event of certain corporate transactions, the surviving entity may assume all stock-based awards outstanding under the 2005 Stock Plan or substitute substantially equivalent awards. If the surviving entity elects not to assume or substitute for all such awards, then with respect to stock-based awards held by persons providing us or any of our affiliates service, the vesting (and, if applicable, the time during which the award

76


 

may be exercised) will be accelerated in full. Stock awards will terminate if not exercised (if applicable) before the effective time of the corporate transaction. In addition, the relevant award agreement may accelerate the vesting and settlement of any award upon a change in control.

       Amendment and Termination. The 2005 Stock Plan will continue in effect until the tenth anniversary of its approval by the board of directors or our stockholders, whichever is earlier, unless earlier terminated by the board of directors. The board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2005 Stock Plan at any time, provided that without stockholder approval, the plan cannot be amended to increase the number of shares authorized, change the class of persons eligible to receive incentive stock options or effect any other change that would require stockholder approval under any applicable law or listing rule. Amendment, suspension or termination of the 2005 Stock Plan may not adversely affect any outstanding award without the consent of the participant, unless such amendment, suspension or termination is necessary to comply with applicable laws, regulations or rules.

2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

       We will adopt the American Reprographics Company 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, and obtain stockholder approval of the plan, prior to the completion of this offering.

       Purpose. The purpose of the ESPP is to advance our interests and the interests of our stockholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain and reward eligible employees. It is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

       Shares Subject to Purchase Plan. A total of 750,000 shares of our common stock are initially authorized and reserved for sale under the ESPP. Appropriate adjustments will be made in the number of authorized shares and in outstanding purchase rights to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights in the event of a stock split or other change in our capital structure.

       Administration. Our board of directors or a committee of the board will serve as administrator of the ESPP. The administrator has the authority to construe and interpret the terms of the ESPP and the purchase rights granted under it, to determine eligibility to participate, and to establish policies and procedures for administration of the plan.

       Eligibility. Our employees and employees of any parent corporation designated by the administrator are eligible to participate in the ESPP if they are customarily employed by us for more than 20 hours per week and more than five months in any calendar year. However, an employee may not be granted a right to purchase stock under the ESPP if: (1) the employee immediately after grant would own stock possessing 5 percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of our capital stock or of any parent or subsidiary corporation, or (2) the employee’s rights to purchase stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans would accrue at a rate that exceeds $25,000 in value for each calendar year of participation in such plans.

       Offerings. The ESPP is implemented by offerings of purchase rights to eligible employees. Under the ESPP, we may specify offerings with a duration of not more than 27 months, and may specify shorter purchase periods within each offering. A new offering will automatically begin on March 1 and September 1 of each year, will generally be 24 months in duration and will consist of four six-month purchase periods, except that the first offering will commence on the effective date of the ESPP and will end on August 31, 2005. The administrator is authorized to establish additional or alternative sequential or overlapping offering periods and offering periods having a different duration or different starting or ending dates, provided that no offering period may have a duration exceeding 27 months.

       Participation. Eligible employees who enroll in the ESPP may elect to have up to 15 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and accumulated for the purchase of shares at the end of each purchase period in each offering in which they participate. However, all eligible employees will

77


 

be automatically enrolled in the ESPP’s initial offering period and may only purchase shares by delivering an exercise notice and payment of the applicable purchase price prior to the initial purchase date, provided that participants may elect to begin payroll deductions under the ESPP after the effective date of a Form S-8 registration statement registering the shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP. Participants may voluntarily withdraw from the ESPP at any time during an offering period and receive a refund, without interest, of all amount withheld from compensation not previously applied to purchase shares. Participation ends automatically upon termination of employment.

       Purchase of Shares. Amounts accumulated for each participant are used to purchase shares of our common stock at the end of each purchase period at a price generally equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of our common stock at the beginning of an offering period or at the end of the corresponding purchase period. Prior to commencement of an offering period, the administrator is authorized to reduce, but not increase, this purchase price discount for that offering period, or, under the circumstances described in the ESPP, during that offering period; provided that such purchase price discount complies with the applicable provisions of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum number of shares a participant may purchase in any calendar year is the lesser of 400 shares or a number of shares having a fair market value of $10,000 (determined on the date of purchase). Prior to the beginning of any offering period, the administrator may alter the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by any participant during the offering period or specify a maximum aggregate number of shares that may be purchased by all participants in the offering period. If an insufficient number of shares remain available under the plan to permit all participants to purchase the number of shares to which they would otherwise be entitled, the administrator will make a pro rata allocation of the available shares. Any amounts withheld from participants’ compensation in excess of the amounts used to purchase shares will be refunded, without interest, or held in the participant’s account for the purchase of shares under the next offering period.

       Corporate Transactions. In the event of certain corporate transactions, an acquiring or successor corporation may assume our rights and obligations under the ESPP. If the acquiring or successor corporation does not assume such rights and obligations or does not substitute them with similar rights and obligations, then the purchase date of the offering periods then in progress will be accelerated to a date prior to the effective time of the corporate transaction.

       Nonassignability. Rights granted under the ESPP are not transferable by a participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. However, a participant may designate a beneficiary who is to receive any cash and/or shares from the participant’s account in the event the participant’s death.

       Amendment and Termination. The ESPP will continue in effect until terminated by the administrator. The administrator may amend, suspend or terminate the ESPP at any time, provided that unless stockholder approval is obtained within 12 months of such amendment, the plan cannot be amended to increase the number of shares authorized or change the definition of the corporations that may be designated by the administrator for participation in the plan. Amendment, suspension or termination of the ESPP may not adversely affect any purchase rights previously granted without the consent of the participant, unless such amendment, suspension or termination is necessary to qualify the plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code or to comply with applicable law, or is effected after a determination by the administrator that continuation of the plan or an offering period would result in unfavorable accounting consequences to us as a result of a change, after the plan’s effective date, in the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the ESPP.

78


 

401(k) Plan

       Holdings sponsors a defined contribution plan intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code covering substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age. Plan participants may contribute up to 75% of their annual eligible compensation, subject to contribution limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. Holdings matches up to 20% of a participant’s contributions up to a maximum of 4% of their eligible annual compensation.

79


 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

       Certain of our directors, executive officers, 5% beneficial owners and their affiliates have engaged in transactions with us in the ordinary course of business. We believe these transactions involved terms comparable to, or more favorable to us than, terms that would be obtained from an unaffiliated third party. The following is a description of these transactions:

Related Party Leases and Purchases

       We are party to certain leases with entities owned by Mr. Chandramohan and Mr. Suriyakumar for our facilities located in Los Angeles, California, San Jose, California, Irvine, California, Sacramento, California, Oakland, California, Gaithersburg, Maryland, and Costa Mesa, California. Under these leases, we paid these entities rent in the aggregate amount of approximately $1,036,356 in 2001, $1,092,600 in 2002, $1,092,600 in 2003, and $744,590 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. We are also obligated to reimburse these entities for certain real property taxes and assessments. These leases expire between January 2006 and December 2013.

       We sell certain products and services to Thomas Reprographics, Inc. and Albinson Inc., each of which is owned or controlled by William Thomas, who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common equity. These companies purchased products and services from us of approximately $215,000 and $95,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and $32,000 during the six months ended 2004.

Management Agreement

       We are party to a management agreement with CHS Management IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Messrs. Code and Formolo, both members of our board of directors, have a direct beneficial ownership in CHS Management IV, L.P. Under the management agreement, we paid CHS Management IV, L.P. a management fee of $803,000 in 2001, $889,000 in 2002 and $858,000 in 2003, and we anticipate paying CHS Management IV, L.P. a management fee of $858,000 in 2004. The annual management fee is subject to an annual increase based on our financial results but shall not exceed $1,000,000 annually. This management fee is in consideration of CHS Management IV, L.P. providing ongoing consulting and management advisory services to us. Our board of directors may terminate the management agreement if it determines in good faith that CHS Management IV, L.P. has materially failed to diligently provide such management services. This management agreement will be terminated upon our initial public offering.

Indemnification Agreements

       We will enter into indemnification agreements with each director which provide indemnification under certain circumstances for acts and omissions which may not be covered by any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. The indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers and directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as officers and directors (other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature), to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to obtain officers’ and directors’ insurance if available on reasonable terms.

Registration Rights Agreement

       We have entered into a registration rights agreement with certain holders of our common stock and holders of warrants to purchase our common stock, including entities affiliated with certain of our executive officers and directors. The holders of 27,220,839 shares of common stock and the holders of 1,168,842 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants are entitled to certain rights with respect to the registration of such shares under the Securities Act. For more detailed

80


 

information regarding these registration rights, please see “Description of Capital Stock — Registration Rights Agreement.”

Investor Unitholders Agreement

       Holdings entered into an Investor Unitholders Agreement with ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. and certain other parties that hold warrants to purchase Holdings common units. Under this agreement, subject to certain exceptions, (i) Holdings has a right of first refusal in connection with a transfer of units acquired by the warrant holders, (ii) the warrant holders have a right to participate in transfers of units by ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., (iii) ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. has limited preemptive rights in connection with an issuance of units by Holdings to the warrant holders and the warrant holders have limited preemptive rights in connection with an issuance of units by Holdings to ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., (iv) the warrant holders have the right to receive certain financial information from Holdings, and (v) the warrant holders have certain property inspection rights. The Investor Unitholders Agreement will be terminated upon the consummation of this offering.

81


 

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

       The following table sets forth information, as of September 30, 2004, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock: (1) immediately prior to the consummation of the offering, but after giving effect to our reorganization; and (2) as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares of common stock in this offering, by:

•  each of our directors and named executive officers;
 
•  all directors and named executive officers as a group;
 
•  each person who is known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock; and
 
•  each of the selling stockholders.

       The table includes all shares of common stock issuable within 60 days of September 30, 2004 upon the exercise of options and other rights beneficially owned by the indicated stockholders on that date. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares. To our knowledge, except under applicable community property laws or as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and sole investment control regarding all shares beneficially owned. The applicable percentage of ownership for each stockholder is based on 35,487,511 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2004, together with applicable options for that stockholder. Shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options and other rights beneficially owned were deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options and other rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

                                           
Shares Beneficially Shares Beneficially
Owned Owned
Prior to Offering After Offering***

Number of
Name and Address* Number Percent Shares Offered(1) Number Percent






Principal Stockholders:
                                       
ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C.(2)
    17,334,221       48.9 %                        
 
10 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3175
                                       
 
Chicago, IL 90606
                                       
 
Micro Device, Inc. 
    7,064,964       19.9 %                        
 
William Thomas(3)(4)
    5,075,964       14.3 %                        
 
600 North Central Expressway
                                       
 
Richardson, TX 75080
                                       
 
OCB Reprographics, Inc. 
    4,616,631       13.0 %                        
 
17721 Mitchell North
                                       
 
Irvine, CA 92714
                                       
 
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
                                       
Andrew W. Code(5)
    17,334,221       48.9 %                        
 
Thomas J. Formolo(5)
    17,334,221       48.9 %                        
 
Sathiyamurthi Chandramohan(3)(4)(6)(7)(8)
    14,810,502       41.7 %                        
 
Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar(3)(4)(6)(7)(8)(9)
    14,777,145       41.6 %                        
 
1981 N. Broadway, Suite 202
                                       
 
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
                                       
 
Rahul K. Roy(10)
    637,500       1.8 %                        
 
Mark W. Legg(11)
    335,001       1.0 %                        

82


 

                                         
Shares Beneficially Shares Beneficially
Owned Owned
Prior to Offering After Offering***

Number of
Name and Address* Number Percent Shares Offered(1) Number Percent






 
Manuel Perez de la Mesa(12)
    37,000       **                          
 
All directors and executive officers as a group (seven persons)
    33,276,366       92.3 %                        
 
Other Selling Stockholders:
                                       
 
Brownies Blueprint, Inc.
    1,656,051       4.7 %                        
 
Dietrich-Post Company
    858,024       2.4 %                        
 
Color Expressions of California, Inc.
    459,333       1.3 %                        
 
Ted Carlson
    300,000       **                          
 
Steve Gilmore
    300,000       **                          
 
Patrick Duggan
    225,000       **                          
 
Richard Nelson
    75,000       **                          
 
Ken Gini(13)
    41,001       **                          
 
Jack Anderson
    35,001       **                          
 
Janine Brandel
    35,001       **                          
 
John Coats
    35,001       **                          
 
Johann De Abeyesinhe
    35,001       **                          
 
David Dodge(14)
    35,001       **                          
 
Trevor Fernando
    35,001       **                          
 
Dan Hagan
    35,001       **                          
 
Doug McCrae
    35,001       **                          
 
Monita Sarthou
    35,001       **                          
 
Virgilio Sim
    35,001       **                          
 
Noel Van Langenberg
    35,001       **                          
 
Laurie Williams
    35,001       **                          
 
CHS Associates IV, L.P.
    28,465       **                          
 
Karl Winkelman
    9,000       **                          
 
Paige Walsh
    1,473       **                          


  * Except as otherwise noted, the address of each person listed in the table is c/o American Reprographics Company, 700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550, Glendale, California 91203.

  ** Less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock.

  ***  Assumes underwriters have not exercised their option to purchase additional shares.
 
  (1)  If the underwriters’ overallotment option is exercised in full, the additional shares sold would be allocated among the selling stockholders as follows:

                         
Shares Beneficially
Owned Assuming
Exercise of
Shares Beneficially Overallotment
Owned Subject to Option
Overallotment
Selling Stockholders Option Number Percent




ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. 
                       
Andrew W. Code(5)
                       
Thomas J. Formolo(5)
                       
CHS Associates IV, L.P. 
                       
Paige Walsh
                       

  If the underwriters’ overallotment option is exercised in part, the additional shares sold would be allocated pro rata based upon the share amounts set forth in the preceding table.

83


 

  (2)  The sole member of ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. is Code Hennessey Simmons IV, L.P. The general partner of Code Hennessy Simmons IV, L.P. is CHS Management IV, L.P. The general partner of CHS Management IV, L.P. is Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC. Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC, CHS Management IV, L.P. and Code Hennessy Simmons IV, L.P. may be deemed to beneficially own these shares, but disclaim beneficial ownership of shares in which they do not have a pecuniary interest. The investment committee of Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC is composed of Andrew W. Code, Daniel J. Hennessy, Brian P. Simmons, Thomas J. Formolo, Jon S. Vesely and Peter M. Gotsch. Messrs. Code, Hennessy, Simmons, Formolo, Vesely and Gotsch may be deemed to beneficially own these shares due to the fact that they share investment and voting control over shares held by ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., but disclaim beneficial ownership of shares in which they do not have a pecuniary interest.
 
  (3)  Includes 4,616,631 shares held by OCB Reprographics, Inc. As Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar and Thomas have ownership interests of 22.4%, 17.6% and 40%, respectively, in OCB Reprographics, Inc. and serve on its Board of Directors, each could be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all these shares. Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of each of their pecuniary interests therein.
 
  (4)  Includes 459,333 shares held by Color Expressions of California, Inc. As Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar and Thomas have ownership interests of 24.8%, 19.5% and 26.7%, respectively, in Color Expressions of California, Inc. and serve on its Board of Directors, each could be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all these shares. Messrs. Chandramohan and, Suriyakumar each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of each of their pecuniary interests therein.
 
  (5)  Andrew W. Code and Thomas J. Formolo are members of the investment committee of Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC, the general partner of CHS Management IV, L.P., which in turn is the general partner of Code, Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., which is the sole member of ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. Messrs. Code and Formolo may be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned by ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., but disclaim beneficial ownership of shares in which they do not have a pecuniary interest.
 
  (6)  Includes 7,064,964 shares held by Micro-Device, Inc. As Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar have ownership interests of 56% and 44%, respectively, in Micro-Device, Inc. and serve on its Board of Directors, each could be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all these shares. Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of each of their pecuniary interests therein.