SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form S-1
American Reprographics Company
7334
20-1700361
(State or other jurisdiction of
(Primary Standard Industrial
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Classification Code Number)
Identification Number)
700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550
Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan
Teresa V. Pahl
|
Brett E. Cooper | Frank H. Golay, Jr. | ||
Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus,
|
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | ||
Vlahos & Rudy, LLP
|
The Orrick Building | 1888 Century Park East | ||
333 Market Street, Suite 2100
|
405 Howard Street | Los Angeles, California 90067 | ||
San Francisco, California 94105
|
San Francisco, California 94105 | (310) 712-6600 | ||
(415) 777-3200
|
(415) 773-5700 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If delivery
of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box.
o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
The
registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such
date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date
until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Subject to Completion. Dated
October 15, 2004.
Shares
This is an initial public offering of shares of
common stock of American Reprographics Company (ARC).
ARC is
offering of
the shares to be sold in the offering. The selling stockholders
identified in this prospectus are offering an
additional shares.
ARC will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the
shares being sold by the selling stockholders.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public
market for the common stock. It is currently estimated that the
initial public offering price will be between
$ and
$ per
share. ARC intends to list the common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol ARP.
See Risk Factors beginning on
page 13 to read about factors you should consider before
buying shares of the common stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of
these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
To the extent the underwriters sell more
than shares
of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up
to an
additional shares
of common stock from the selling stockholders at the initial
public offering price less the underwriting discount.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares
against payment in New York, New York
on .
Prospectus
dated .
TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES
We own or have rights to trademarks, service
marks, copyrights and trade names that we use in conjunction
with the operation of our business, including the names
American Reprographics Company
SM
,
ARC
SM
, Abacus
PCR
TM
, BidCaster
SM
,
EWO
SM
,
MetaPrint
TM
,
OneView
SM
, PEiR
SM
,
PlanWell®, PlanWell
PDS
TM
, PlanWell
Enterprise
SM
, and various design marks
associated therewith. This prospectus also includes trademarks,
service marks and trade names of other companies.
MARKET DATA
We operate in an industry in which it is
difficult to obtain precise industry and market information.
Although we have obtained some industry data from third party
sources that we believe to be reliable, in many cases we have
based certain statements contained in this prospectus regarding
our industry and our position in the industry on estimates
concerning our customers and competitors. These estimates are
based on our experience in the industry, conversations with our
principal vendors, our own investigation of market conditions
and information obtained through our numerous acquisitions. We
cannot assure you as to the accuracy of any such estimates, and
such estimates may not be indicative of our position in our
industry.
i
Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Amount of
Title of Each Class of
Offering
Registration
Securities to be Registered
Price(1)(2)
Fee
$230,000,000
$29,141
(1)
Includes shares to be sold upon exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option.
(2)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating
the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The information in this
preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These
securities may not be sold until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective.
This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it
seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where
the offer or sale is not permitted.
Per Share
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
JPMorgan
Robert W. Baird & Co.
CIBC World Markets
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights only selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on page F-1, before investing in our common stock. In this prospectus, unless the context indicates otherwise, we, us, our, American Reprographics, ARC, our company, and similar terms refer to American Reprographics Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Our Company
We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. We also provide these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality, that also require sophisticated document management services. The business-to-business services we provide to our customers include document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand. We provide our core services through industry leading technology and innovation, a sophisticated network of 173 locally branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs at our customers locations. We also sell reprographics equipment and supplies to complement our full range of service offerings. In further support of our core services, we license our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship internet-based application, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. We also operate PEiR (Profit and Education in Reprographics) through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers, while promoting our reprographics technology as the industry standard. Our services are critical to our customers because they shorten their document processing and distribution time, improve the quality of their document information management, and provide a secure, controlled document management environment.
We operate 173 reprographics service centers, including 170 service centers in 133 cities in 29 states throughout the United States and three reprographics service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. Our reprographics service centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. These service centers are arranged in a hub and satellite structure and are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide our services both locally and nationally. We service more than 65,000 active customers and employ over 3,450 people, including a sales force of approximately 270 employees.
In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We believe that our extensive national footprint, our industry leading technology, and our comprehensive offering of value-added services, including logistics and facilities management, provide us with a distinct competitive advantage.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, our net sales were $416.0 million, our income from operations was $62.5 million, our adjusted EBITDA (adjusted to exclude a one-time charge of $14.9 million related to the early extinguishment of debt) was $81.9 million, and our net income was $4.9 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, our net sales were $226.1 million, our income from operations was $40.0 million, our EBITDA was $49.2 million, and our net income was $19.2 million. Based on our year to date net sales, we believe that the AEC market accounted for approximately 80% of our net sales, with the remaining 20% consisting of sales to non-AEC markets. During the five years ended December 31, 2003, we grew our net sales at a compounded annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 24.3% and maintained an adjusted EBITDA margin in excess of
1
We have continued to expand our geographic coverage and market share by entering complementary markets through strategic acquisitions of high quality companies with well-recognized local brand names and, in most cases, more than 25 years of operating history. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 companies and have retained approximately 93% of the management of the acquired companies. As part of our growth strategy, we have recently begun opening and operating branch service centers, which we view as a low cost, rapid form of market expansion. Our branch openings require modest capital expenditures and are expected to generate operating profit within 12 months from opening. We have opened 15 new branches in key markets since September 2003 and expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005.
Industry Overview
The reprographics industry has traditionally provided services related to the reproduction and distribution of large format architectural, engineering and construction documents. Customer demands for speed and efficiency and advances in technology have transformed the reprographics industry such that reprographers are now expected to offer complex digital document management capabilities, document distribution expertise, comprehensive logistics, and the ability to provide document services under intense deadlines. These sophisticated services typically are charged as part of a per square foot printing cost.
According to the International Reprographics Association, or IRgA, the reprographics industry in the United States is estimated to be $5 billion in size. The IRgA indicates that the reprographics industry is highly fragmented, consisting of approximately 3,000 firms with average annual sales of approximately $1.5 million and 20 to 25 employees. Since construction documents are the primary medium of communication for the AEC industry, demand for reprographics services in the AEC market is closely tied to the level of activity in the construction industry, which in turn is driven by macroeconomic trends such as GDP growth, interest rates, job creation, office vacancy rates, and tax revenues. According to FMI Corporation, or FMI, a consulting firm to the construction industry, construction industry spending in the United States for 2004 is estimated at $975 billion, with expenditures divided between residential construction (55%) and commercial and public, or non-residential, construction (45%). The $5 billion reprographics industry is approximately 0.5% of the $975 billion construction industry in the United States. Our AEC revenues are most closely correlated to the non-residential sectors of the construction industry which sectors are the largest users of reprographics services. According to FMI, the non-residential sectors of the construction industry are projected to grow at an average of 5.4% per year over the next three years.
Non-residential construction projects are generally large in scale, time consuming, and subject to cost overruns and delays. A frequent cause of such problems is the complexity of the construction documentation and the logistics involved in distributing documents to their intended recipients. Reprographers can facilitate better document management through technology applications. For example, reprographers can provide more efficient document distribution by shifting from an analog print and distribute business model, where customer orders are placed and produced in one location and physically distributed locally or nationally, to a digital distribute and print model, where customer orders are placed in one location, distributed digitally and physically produced at one or more local service centers.
Market opportunities for business-to-business document management services such as ours are rapidly expanding into non-AEC industries. For example, non-AEC customers are increasingly using large and small format color imaging for point-of-purchase displays, digital publishing, presentation materials, educational materials and marketing materials as these services have become more efficient and available on a short-run, on-demand basis through digital technology. As a result, we believe that our addressable market is substantially larger than the core AEC
2
The development of digital technology and internet-based solutions for managing documents and the corresponding distribution and reproduction processes have created the opportunity for reprographics companies such as ourselves to offer complementary, value-added services to AEC and non-AEC customers through intelligent technological solutions and an extensive physical network.
Our Services
We provide business-to-business services to our customers in three key areas: document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand. These services include:
| PlanWell, our proprietary, internet-based planroom launched in June 2000, and our suite of other reprographics software products that enable the online purchase and fulfillment of reprographics services. From PlanWells inception in June 2000 through September 1, 2004, more than 650,000 orders have been placed through PlanWell online planrooms for the management of more than 54,000 projects and over seven million complex, large format documents. |
| Production services, including print-on-demand, document assembly, document finishing, mounting, laminating, binding, and kitting, provided through our national footprint of service centers, all of which are connected through a sophisticated digital network. |
| Logistics, including pick up, delivery, and shipping of time-sensitive, critical documents. These services are supported by a fleet of approximately 675 vehicles and nearly 700 employees. Contracted courier services allow our divisions to manage additional delivery capacity through approximately 157 vehicles and drivers. |
| Highly customized large and small format reprographics in color and black and white. These customizable services, made possible by advances in digital production equipment and software, have allowed us to expand our service offerings to both our traditional AEC customer base, as well as pursue new, recurring business in the non-AEC market. |
| Facilities management, including recurring on-site document management services, staffing, and management and procurement of related on-site equipment and supplies at our customers locations through our more than 1,560 facilities management programs. |
| Sales of reprographics equipment and supplies to end-users in the AEC industry to further complement our full range of service offerings and further increase our purchasing power. |
| Other document management and reprographics software, including Abacus PCR (Print Cost Recovery System), BidCaster, EWO (Electronic Work Order), MetaPrint and OneView, among others, that support ordering, tracking, job costing, and other customer specific accounting information for a variety of projects and services. |
To further support and promote our core services ( document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand ), we also:
| License our suite of reprographics technology products, including PlanWell, to independent reprographers to promote our technology as the digital standard for the fulfillment of reprographics services in the AEC industry and enhance our leading position in AEC document management. Through September 1, 2004, we have licensed PlanWell and our other technology products to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities throughout the United States. |
| Operate PEiR, a trade organization wholly owned by us, through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers. PEiR members, currently consisting of 43 independent reprographers, are required to license PlanWell |
3
and may purchase equipment and supplies at a lower cost than they could obtain independently. In turn, their purchasing volumes increase our buying power and influence with vendors. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that we maintain the following competitive strengths:
| Leading Market Position in Fragmented Industry. In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We are the largest reprographer in most of the geographic markets we serve, as the majority of the approximately 3,000 firms in the reprographics industry are small and locally focused. Our size and national footprint provide us with significant purchasing power, economies of scale, the ability to invest in industry leading technologies, and the resources to service large, national customers. |
| Leader in Technology and Innovation. We strive to maintain the leading position in our industry by creating innovative, value-added technology solutions for our customers and other independent reprographers. We believe PlanWell is well positioned to become the industry standard within the AEC industry. In addition, we have developed other proprietary software applications that complement PlanWell and have enabled us to improve the efficiency of our services, add complementary services and increase our revenue. |
| Extensive National Footprint with Regional Expertise. Our national network of service centers maintains local customer relationships while benefiting from our centralized corporate functions and national scale. Each service center provides sophisticated, personalized services that are tailored to meet the regional needs of our customers. Our service facilities are organized as hub and satellite structures within individual markets, allowing us to balance production capacity and minimize capital expenditures through technology sharing among our service centers within each market. The majority of our customers are no more than five miles from one of our service centers. We also leverage the geographic coverage of our production facilities to address the service needs of large companies that operate in multiple locations. Our Premier Accounts business unit offers regional and national customers our services under a single contract, while offering centralized access to project specific services, billing, and tracking information. |
| Flexible Operating Model. We are able to tailor our operations to meet the demands of the local markets that we serve by promoting regional decision making for marketing, pricing, and selling practices. In this manner, we remain responsive to our customers while benefiting from the cost structure advantages of our centralized administrative functions. Our flexible operating model also allows us to capitalize on an improving business environment. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2003, we achieved an operating margin (income from operations divided by net sales) of 15.0% and an EBITDA margin (exclusive of a one-time charge related to the early extinguishment of debt) of 19.7%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we experienced revenue growth of 5.6% compared to the same period in 2003 and achieved an operating margin of 17.7% and an EBITDA margin of 21.8%, resulting in margin improvement of approximately 2.7 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, demonstrating the leverage in our operating model in an expanding business environment. |
| Consistent, Strong Free Cash Flow. Through management of our inventory and receivables and our low capital expenditure requirements, we have consistently generated strong free cash flow (defined as operating cash flow less cash capital expenditures) regardless of recent industry and economic conditions. Our historical capital expenditures have been relatively low, with overall capital spending averaging approximately 1.5% of annual net sales over the last three years. In 2003, we generated free cash flow of $43.2 million. From the beginning of 2001 to the end of June 2004, we generated a cumulative $164.0 million of free cash flow. |
4
| Low Cost Operator. We believe we are one of the lowest cost operators in the reprographics industry, which we have accomplished by minimizing branch level expenses and capitalizing on our significant scale for purchasing efficiencies. As a result of our national presence and size, we enjoy significant economies of scale, and receive favorable terms from major vendors of equipment, software and reprographics supplies such as Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company, CDW Corporation, and Dell Inc. We also offer savings to other reprographers through our PEiR division, which allows members to purchase machinery and supplies at lower prices than they could obtain independently while further increasing our purchasing power. |
| Experienced Management Team and Highly Trained Workforce. Our senior management team of S. Mohan Chandramohan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, K. Suri Suriyakumar, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Mark Legg, Chief Financial Officer, together with our divisional managers, has an average of over 20 years of industry experience. Mr. Chandramohan has been with us since February 1988 and Mr. Suriyakumar has been with us since November 1989. We have also successfully retained approximately 93% of the managers of the 80 businesses we have acquired since 1997. |
Our Business Strategy
Our objective is to continue to strengthen our competitive position as the preferred provider of business-to-business document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services . We seek to strengthen this position while increasing revenue, cash flow, profitability, and market share. Our key strategies to accomplish these objectives include:
| Continue to Increase Our Market Penetration and Expand Our Nationwide Footprint. Through our technical and operational expertise and strong customer relationships, we expect to continue to penetrate key markets and build our nationwide presence. We intend to increase our existing presence in key U.S. markets while expanding into under-penetrated regions through our facilities management contracts, targeted branch openings, strategic acquisitions, and national accounts. |
Õ | Facilities Management Contracts. We expect to capitalize on the continued trend of our customers to outsource their document management services, including their in-house operations. Since January 1, 2001, the number of our facilities management contracts has more than doubled. Based on the six months ended June 30, 2004, annualized net sales from these contracts have grown to $69.0 million. We will continue to concentrate on developing ongoing facilities management relationships in all of the markets we serve and building our base of recurring revenue. | |
Õ | Targeted Branch Openings. Significant opportunities exist to expand our geographic coverage, capture new customers and increase our market share by opening additional satellite branches in regions near our established operations. Our strategy with respect to branch openings is in the early stages of implementation, having evolved as the next stage of our growth to complement our traditional acquisition strategy. Since September 2003, we have opened 15 new branches in areas that expand or further penetrate our existing markets and expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005. Capital investment for a new branch is modest and these new branches are expected to generate positive operating profit within 12 months from opening. | |
Õ | Strategic Acquisitions. Acquisitions have historically been an important component of our growth strategy. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 reprographics companies. We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our business further through disciplined, strategic acquisitions due to the fragmented nature of our industry. Because our industry consists primarily of small, privately-held companies that serve only local markets, we believe that we |
5
can continue to grow our business by successfully acquiring additional reprographics companies at reasonable prices, and realizing substantial operating and purchasing synergies by leveraging our existing corporate infrastructure. | ||
Õ | National Accounts. Our Premier Accounts business unit offers a comprehensive suite of reprographics services designed to meet the demands of large regional and national businesses. It provides local reprographics services to national companies through our national network of reprographics service centers, while offering centralized access to project-specific services, billing and tracking information. For example, we recently entered into an exclusive Premier Accounts contract with one of the leading construction companies in the United States under which we offer a full range of document management, distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services on a national scale. This contract requires that the customer use PlanWell for every project, and the use of PlanWell by this customers contractors, subcontractors and outside work force should significantly improve the potential for revenue growth from this account. We believe that we will continue to capture additional revenues and national customers through this business unit. |
| Promote PlanWell as the Industry Standard for Procuring Reprographics Services Online. Our goal is to continue to expand market penetration of PlanWell and create a standardized, internet-based portal to manage, store, and retrieve documents. In order to increase market share and achieve industry standardization, we will continue to license our PlanWell technology to other reprographics companies, including members of PEiR. Through September 1, 2004, PlanWell and our other technology products have been licensed to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities throughout the United States. These efforts, combined with the strong functionality and growing capabilities of the PlanWell suite of products, should continue to position us at the forefront of technological innovation within the AEC and non-AEC reprographics markets, and create additional service and licensing revenue for us. |
| Expand Our Non-AEC and Ancillary Product and Service Offerings. We have leveraged advances in digital production equipment and our expertise in providing highly customized, quick-turn services to the AEC industry to actively pursue customers from non-AEC industries that seek sophisticated document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We have been successful in attracting non-AEC customers that require services such as the production of large format and small format color and black and white documents, educational and training materials, short-run publishing products, and retail and promotional items. We began targeting non-AEC customers upon our conversion to digital technology in 1997 and we believe that our services to these customers accounted for approximately 20% of our year to date net sales. |
In addition to expanding our non-AEC revenues, we continue to focus on creating new value-added services beyond traditional reprographics to offer all of our customers. We are actively engaged in services such as bid facilitation, print network management for offices and on-site production facilities, and on-demand color publishing. We plan to continue to capitalize on our technological innovation to enhance our existing services and to create new reprographics technologies.
Corporate Background and Reorganization
Our predecessor, Ford Graphics, was founded in Los Angeles, California in 1960. In 1967, this sole proprietorship was dissolved and a new corporate structure was established under the name Micro Device, Inc., which continued to provide reprographics services under the name Ford Graphics. In 1989, our current senior management team purchased Micro Device, Inc., and in November 1997 our company was recapitalized as a California limited liability company, with management retaining a 50% ownership position and the remainder owned by outside investors. In February 2000, Code Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., a private equity fund formed by Code
6
We are currently organized as American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Holdings. We conduct our operations through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American Reprographics Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Opco, and its subsidiaries.
Immediately prior to the closing of this offering, we will reorganize from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics Company. In the reorganization, the members of Holdings will exchange their common units and options to purchase common units for shares of our common stock and options to purchase shares of our common stock. As required by the operating agreement of Holdings, we will repurchase all of the preferred equity of Holdings upon the closing of this offering with a portion of the net proceeds from this offering.
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus gives effect to our reorganization. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus are the financial statements of Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Our principal executive offices are located at 700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550, Glendale, California 91203 and our telephone number at that address is (818) 500-0225. Our website address is www.e-arc.com. The information found on our website, however, is not a part of this prospectus.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider all of the information in this prospectus. In particular, for a discussion of some specific factors that you should consider in evaluating an investment in our common stock, see Risk Factors beginning on page 13.
7
The Offering
Unless otherwise noted, the information in this
prospectus, including the information above:
8
Common stock offered by us
shares
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders
shares
Total common stock offered
shares
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering
shares
Use of proceeds
We expect to use approximately $26.8 million
of the net proceeds from this offering to repurchase our
preferred equity; approximately $49.9 million to repay a
portion of our senior second priority secured term loan
facility; and the balance of approximately $27.8 million to
repay a portion of our senior first priority secured term loan
facility. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
shares by the selling stockholders.
Dividend policy
We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future.
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol
ARP
Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma
Financial Data
The summary historical and unaudited pro forma
financial data presented below are derived from the audited
financial statements of Holdings for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, and the
unaudited financial statements of Holdings for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004. The summary
historical financial data for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2003 and 2004 are derived from unaudited interim
financial statements which, in the opinion of management,
include all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to state
fairly the data included therein in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial
information, except for pro forma data. Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
entire fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma financial data set
forth below give effect to our conversion to a Delaware
corporation and the completion of this offering, as described in
Use of Proceeds. The unaudited pro forma financial
data are not necessarily indicative of our financial position or
results of operations that might have occurred had the
transactions they give effect to been completed as of the dates
indicated and do not purport to represent what our financial
position or results of operations might be for any future period
or date. For additional information see
Capitalization, Selected Historical and
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and our audited
financial statements and unaudited financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
9
10
11
12
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
223,836
$
351,099
$
420,701
$
418,924
$
415,960
$
214,154
$
226,133
134,531
201,390
243,710
247,778
252,028
127,311
130,790
89,305
149,709
176,991
171,146
163,932
86,843
95,343
53,730
83,139
102,576
101,805
101,252
51,044
55,264
2,823
3,966
5,731
218
131
67
54
20,544
6,232
1,428
1,500
3,438
32,752
35,828
63,818
67,623
62,549
35,732
40,025
638
713
304
541
1,024
731
567
(9,215
)
(29,238
)
(47,530
)
(39,917
)
(39,390
)
(18,116
)
(16,248
)
(1,195
)
(14,921
)
24,175
6,108
16,592
28,247
9,262
18,347
24,344
4,068
4,784
5,802
6,304
4,321
3,641
5,174
20,107
1,324
10,790
21,943
4,941
14,706
19,170
(2,158
)
(3,107
)
(3,291
)
(1,730
)
(1,730
)
20,107
(834
)
7,683
18,652
3,211
12,976
19,170
5,304
2,618
2,622
6,275
1,407
4,305
5,937
$
14,803
$
(3,452
)
$
5,061
$
12,377
$
1,804
$
8,671
$
13,233
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
$
0.60
$
(0.10
)
$
0.14
$
0.34
$
0.05
$
0.24
$
0.37
$
0.60
$
(0.10
)
$
0.14
$
0.34
$
0.05
$
0.24
$
0.35
24,571
35,308
36,629
36,406
35,480
35,473
35,488
24,571
35,371
36,758
36,723
37,298
35,999
37,440
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
33,390
$
35,346
$
64,122
$
68,164
$
48,652
$
36,463
$
40,592
$
42,932
$
50,288
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
67,011
$
45,878
$
49,215
$
42,932
$
72,027
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
81,932
$
45,878
$
49,215
14.9
%
16.3
%
15.2
%
16.3
%
15.3
%
17.0
%
18.0
%
19.2
%
20.5
%
21.3
%
20.5
%
19.7
%
21.4
%
21.8
%
$
9,542
$
14,942
$
25,372
$
17,898
$
18,359
$
9,415
$
8,623
$
3,877
$
5,228
$
8,659
$
5,209
$
4,992
$
1,817
$
3,427
$
9,215
$
29,238
$
47,530
$
39,917
$
39,390
$
18,116
$
16,248
As of June 30, 2004,
Pro
As of December 31,
Forma
As
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Actual
Adjusted(8)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
15,814
$
31,565
$
29,110
$
24,995
$
17,315
$
16,809
$
6,307
$
204,464
$
358,026
$
371,948
$
395,677
$
376,843
$
389,133
$
376,916
$
123,951
$
359,746
$
371,515
$
378,102
$
360,008
$
360,137
$
256,053
$
32,422
$
(80,478
)
$
(78,900
)
$
(59,784
)
$
(57,329
)
$
(40,079
)
$
68,264
$
15,379
$
34,742
$
24,338
$
24,371
$
16,809
$
32,870
$
22,368
(1)
Until our reorganization, which will be effective
prior to the closing of this offering, a substantial portion of
our business will continue to operate as a limited liability
company, or LLC, and taxed as a partnership. As a result, the
members of the LLC pay the income taxes on the earnings. The
unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision amounts
reflected in the table above were calculated as if our
reorganization became effective on January 1, 1999.
(2)
EBIT is a non-GAAP measure that represents
earnings before interest expense and income taxes. EBITDA is a
non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. We
believe that EBIT and EBITDA are, and will continue to be,
financial measures useful to financial analysts and to the
lending community because they are generally used in analyzing
the operating performance of a company and its ability to
service debt and otherwise meet its cash needs. EBIT and EBITDA,
however, are not measures of financial performance under GAAP
and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more
meaningful than, net income as a measure of operating
performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or
financing activities as a measure of liquidity. Since EBIT and
EBITDA are not measures determined in accordance with GAAP and,
thus, are susceptible to
varying interpretations and calculations, EBIT
and EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to other
similarly titled measures of other companies. Neither EBIT nor
EBITDA represents an amount of funds that is available for
managements discretionary use.
(3)
The following is a reconciliation of cash flows
provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA, and pro forma
net income:
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
28,569
$
28,054
$
53,151
$
56,413
$
48,237
$
26,922
$
28,515
242
(95
)
(533
)
(5,482
)
(4,860
)
1,503
1,247
(8,704
)
(26,635
)
(41,828
)
(28,988
)
(38,436
)
(13,719
)
(10,592
)
4,068
4,784
5,802
6,304
4,321
3,641
5,174
9,215
29,238
47,530
39,917
39,390
18,116
16,248
33,390
35,346
64,122
68,164
48,652
36,463
40,592
9,542
14,942
25,372
17,898
18,359
9,415
8,623
42,932
50,288
89,494
86,062
67,011
45,878
49,215
(9,215
)
(29,238
)
(47,530
)
(39,917
)
(39,390
)
(18,116
)
(16,248
)
(9,372
)
(7,402
)
(8,424
)
(12,579
)
(5,728
)
(7,946
)
(11,111
)
(9,542
)
(14,942
)
(25,372
)
(17,898
)
(18,359
)
(9,415
)
(8,623
)
(2,158
)
(3,107
)
(3,291
)
(1,730
)
(1,730
)
$
14,803
$
(3,452
)
$
5,061
$
12,377
$
1,804
$
8,671
$
13,233
(4)
Adjusted EBITDA refers to our EBITDA, adjusted to
exclude the impact of (i) costs incurred in connection with
our recapitalization in 2000 and (ii) loss on early
extinguishment of debt. We believe that adjustment for these
items is recognized by the industry in which we operate to be
relevant as a supplementary non-GAAP financial measure widely
used by financial analysts and others in our industry to
meaningfully evaluate a companys operating performance and
ability to comply with its applicable debt covenants. We also
use adjusted EBITDA to measure and pay certain annual management
bonuses. In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, you should
be aware that in the future, we may incur expenses similar to
the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of
adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our
future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring
items.
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to
adjusted EBITDA:
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
42,932
$
50,288
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
67,011
$
45,878
$
49,215
20,544
1,195
14,921
$
42,932
$
72,027
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
81,932
$
45,878
$
49,215
(5)
The adjusted EBIT margin is calculated by
subtracting depreciation and amortization from adjusted EBITDA
and dividing the result by net sales.
(6)
The adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by
dividing adjusted EBITDA by net sales.
(7)
Depreciation and amortization includes a
write-off of intangible assets of $3.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2001.
(8)
Prepared on the same basis as the capitalization
table. See Capitalization.
(9)
In July 2003, we adopted
SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity. In accordance with SFAS No. 150, the
redeemable preferred equity of Holdings has been reclassified in
our financial statements as a component of our total debt upon
our adoption of this new standard. The redeemable preferred
equity amounted to $25.8 million as of December 31,
2003 and $26.8 million as of June 30, 2004.
SFAS No. 150 does not permit the restatement of
financial statements for periods prior to the adoption of this
standard.
(10)
Redeemable common membership units amounted to
$6.0 million and $8.1 million at December 31,
2000 and 2001, respectively.
(11)
The decline in total members equity
(deficit) from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000
was a result of an $88.8 million cash distribution to
Holdings common unit holders in connection with the 2000
recapitalization and the reclassification of $20.3 million
of preferred equity issued in connection with the 2000
recapitalization upon the adoption of SFAS No. 150 in
July 2003.
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a number of risks. You should carefully consider all of the information contained in this prospectus, including the risk factors set forth below, before investing in the common stock offered pursuant to this prospectus. We may encounter risks in addition to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also impair or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In such case, you may lose all or part of your original investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business is sensitive to general economic conditions that could negatively impact our financial results.
We believe that AEC markets accounted for approximately 80% of our year to date net sales. Our historical operating results reflect the cyclical and variable nature of the AEC industry. This industry historically experiences alternating periods of inadequate supplies of housing, commercial and industrial space coupled with low vacancies, causing a surge in construction activity and increased demand for reprographics services, followed by periods of oversupply and high vacancies and declining demand for reprographics services. In addition, existing and future government policies and programs may greatly influence the level of construction spending in the public sector, such as highways, schools, hospitals, sewers, and heavy construction. Since we derive a majority of our revenues from reprographics products and services provided to the AEC industry, our operating results are more sensitive to the nature of this industry than other companies who serve more diversified markets. Our experience has shown that the AEC industry generally experiences economic downturns six months after a downturn in the general economy. We expect that there may be a similar delay in the rebound of the AEC industry following a rebound in the general economy. Future economic and industry downturns may be characterized by diminished demand for our products and services and, therefore, any continued weakness in our customers markets and overall global economic conditions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, because approximately 60% of our overall costs are fixed, changes in economic activity, positive or negative, affect our results of operations. As a result, our results of operations are subject to volatility and could deteriorate rapidly in an environment of declining revenues. Failure to maintain adequate cash reserves and effectively manage our costs could adversely affect our ability to offset our fixed costs and may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors may hinder our ability to execute our business strategy and maintain our profitability.
The markets for our products and services are highly competitive, with competition primarily at a local and regional level. We compete primarily based on customer service, technological leadership, product performance and price. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to improve our service offerings, and develop and integrate technological advances. If we are unable to integrate technological advances into our service offerings to successfully meet the evolving needs of our customers in a timely manner, our operating results may be adversely affected. Technological innovation by our existing or future competitors could put us at a competitive disadvantage. In particular, our business could be adversely affected if any of our competitors develop or acquire superior technology that competes directly with or offers greater functionality than our technology, including PlanWell.
We also face the possibility that competition will continue to increase, particularly if copy and printing or business services companies choose to expand into the reprographics services industry. Many of these companies are substantially larger and have significantly greater financial resources
13
The reprographics industry has undergone vast changes in the last six years and will continue to evolve, and our failure to anticipate and adapt to future changes in our industry could harm our competitive position.
In the past six years, the reprographics industry has undergone vast changes. The industrys main production technology has migrated from analog to digital. This has prompted a number of trends in the reprographics industry, including a rapid shift toward decentralized production and lower labor utilization. As digital output devices become smaller, less expensive, easier to use and interconnected, end users of construction drawings are placing these devices within their offices and other locations. On-site reprographics equipment allows a customer to print documents and review hard copies without the delays or interruptions associated with sending documents out for duplication. Also, as a direct result of advancements in digital technology, labor demands have decreased. Instead of producing one print at a time, reprographers now have the capability to produce multiple sets of documents with a single production employee. By linking output devices through a single print server, a production employee simply directs output to the device that is best suited for the job. As a result of these trends, reprographers have had to modify their operations to decentralize printing and shift costs from labor to technology.
Looking forward, we expect the reprographics industry to continue to evolve. Our industry will continue to embrace digital technology, not only in terms of production services, but also in terms of network technology, digital document storage and management, and information distribution, all of which will require investment in, and continued development of, technological innovation. If we fail to keep pace with current changes or fail to anticipate or adapt to future changes in our industry, our competitive position could be harmed.
We cannot be certain that our service innovations will continue.
In order to remain competitive, we must continually invest in new technologies that will enable us to meet the evolving demands of our customers. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in the introduction and marketing of any new services, or that we will develop and introduce in a timely manner innovative services that satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop new services and introduce them successfully could harm our ability to grow our business and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, as reprographics technologies continue to be developed, one or more of our current service offerings may become obsolete. In particular, digital technologies may significantly reduce the need for high volume printing. Digital technology may also make traditional reprographics equipment smaller and cheaper, which may cause larger AEC customers to discontinue outsourcing their reprographics needs. Any such developments could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
14
If we are unable to charge for our value-added services to offset potential declines in print volumes, our long term revenue could be adversely affected.
Our customers value the ability to view and order prints via the internet and print to output devices in their own offices and other locations throughout the country. This trend toward consuming information on an as needed basis could result in decreasing printing volumes and declining revenues in the longer term. Failure to offset these potential declines in printing volumes by changing how we charge for our services and developing additional revenue sources could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We derive a significant percentage of net sales from within the State of California.
We derived approximately half of our net sales in 2003, and in the six months ended June 30, 2004, from our operations in California. As a result, we are dependent to a large extent upon the AEC industry in California and, accordingly, are sensitive to economic factors affecting California, including general and local economic conditions, macroeconomic trends, and natural disasters. Any adverse developments affecting California could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our growth strategy depends in part on our ability to successfully identify and manage our acquisitions and branch openings. Failure to do so could impede our future growth and adversely affect our competitive position.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to prudently pursue strategic acquisitions within the reprographics industry. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 businesses, most of which were long established in the communities in which they conduct their business. Our efforts to execute our acquisition strategy may be affected by our ability to continue to identify, negotiate, integrate, and close acquisitions. In addition, any governmental review or investigation of our proposed acquisitions, such as by the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, may impede, limit or prevent us from proceeding with an acquisition. For example, our acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics in 2001 triggered an investigation by the FTC, which has since been concluded without any action being taken against us by the FTC. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions, although we currently have no agreements or active negotiations with respect to any material acquisitions.
Acquisitions involve a number of special risks. There may be difficulties integrating acquired personnel and distinct business cultures. Additional financing may be necessary and, if available, could increase our leverage, dilute our equity, or both. Acquisitions may divert managements time and our resources from existing operations. It is possible that there could be a negative effect on our financial statements from the impairment related to goodwill and other intangibles. We may experience the loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies. In addition, risks may include high transaction costs and expenses of integrating acquired companies, as well as exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies and failure of the acquired business to achieve expected results. These risks could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, we have recently begun to expand our geographic coverage by opening additional satellite branches in regions near our established operations to capture new customers and greater market share. Since September 2003, we have opened 15 new branches in areas that expand or further penetrate our existing markets, and we expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005. Although the capital investment for a new branch is modest, our growth strategy with respect to branch openings is in the early stages of implementation and the branches we open in the future may not ultimately produce returns that justify our investment.
15
We operate under a dual operating structure which, if not successfully managed, could harm our business and profitability.
We operate our company under a dual operating structure of centralized administrative functions and regional decision making on marketing, pricing, and selling practices. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 businesses and, in most cases, have delegated the responsibility for marketing, pricing, and selling practices with the local and operational managers of these businesses. If we do not successfully manage our subsidiaries under this decentralized operating structure, we risk having disparate results, lost market opportunities, lack of economic synergies, and a loss of vision and planning, all of which could harm our business and profitability.
In August 2003, we restated our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 to correct accounting misstatements at one of our subsidiaries during 2001 due to fraud by certain managers at the subsidiary. The accounting misstatements at the subsidiary resulted in the overstatement of net income in 2001 by $1,461,000. In response to these accounting misstatements, we have strengthened our financial and management policies and procedures, established an internal audit group, and improved our accounting controls. However, we cannot assure that these new internal controls will be effective in preventing similar fraud in the future.
We depend on certain key vendors, and adverse developments concerning these vendors, or our relationships with these vendors, could adversely affect our business.
We purchase reprographics equipment and maintenance services, as well as paper, toner and other supplies, from a limited number of vendors. Our four largest vendors, which supplied a substantial amount of our reprographics equipment, maintenance services, and production supplies in 2003, are Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., and Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company. Adverse developments concerning key vendors or our relationships with them could force us to seek alternate sources for our reprographics equipment, maintenance services and supplies or to purchase such items on unfavorable terms. An alternative source of supply of reprographics equipment, maintenance services and supplies may not be readily available. A delay in procuring reprographics equipment, maintenance services or supplies, or an increase in the cost to purchase such reprographics equipment, maintenance services or supplies could limit our ability to provide services to our customers on a timely and cost-effective basis, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our failure to adequately protect the proprietary aspects of our technology, including PlanWell, may cause us to lose market share.
Our success depends on our ability to protect and preserve the proprietary aspects of our technologies, including PlanWell. We rely on a combination of copyright and trademark protection, confidentiality agreements, non-compete agreements, reseller agreements, customer contracts, and technical measures to establish and protect our rights in our proprietary technologies. Under our PlanWell license agreements, we grant other reprographers a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited license to use our technology and receive our services. Our license agreements contain terms and conditions prohibiting the unauthorized reproduction or transfer of our products. These protections, however, may not be adequate to remedy harm we suffer due to misappropriation of our proprietary rights by third parties. In addition, U.S. law provides only limited protection of proprietary rights and the laws of some foreign countries may offer less protection than the laws of the United States. Unauthorized third parties may copy aspects of our products, reverse engineer our products or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Others may develop non-infringing technologies that are similar or superior to ours. If competitors are able to develop such technology and we cannot successfully enforce our rights against them, they may be able to market and sell or license the marketing and sale of products that compete with ours, and this competition could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, intellectual
16
Our intellectual property rights may be subject to the rights of third parties.
Other companies or individuals may pursue litigation against us with respect to intellectual property-based claims, including claims relating to the use of our brands, trademarks, logos, technologies, trade secrets, and other proprietary information. In the event of an adverse result in any litigation with respect to intellectual property rights relevant to our business that could arise in the future, we could be required to obtain licenses to the infringing technology; begin using other brands, trademarks and logos; pay substantial damages under applicable law; or expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology. There can be no assurance that suitable replacement technologies would be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. Our insurance may not cover potential claims or may not be adequate to indemnify us for damages we incur. Also, litigation frequently involves substantial expenditures and can require significant management attention, even if we ultimately prevail.
Damage or disruption to our facilities, our technology centers, our vendors or a majority of our customers may have a significant impact on our revenues, expenses and financial condition.
We currently store most of our customer data at our two technology centers located in Northern California near known earthquake fault zones. Damage or destruction of one or both of these technology centers or a disruption of our data storage processes resulting from sustained process abnormalities, human error, acts of terrorism, violence, war or a natural disaster, such as fire, earthquake or flood, could have a material adverse effect on the markets in which we operate, our business operations, our expectations and other forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. In addition, such damage or destruction on a national scale resulting in a general economic downturn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We store and maintain critical customer data on computer servers at our technology centers that our customers access remotely through the internet and/or directly through telecommunications lines. If our back-up power generators fail during any power outage, if our telecommunications lines are severed or those lines on the internet are impaired for any reason, our remote access customers would be unable to access their critical data, causing an interruption in their operations. In such event, our remote access customers and their customers could seek to hold us responsible for any losses. We may also potentially lose these customers and our reputation could be harmed. In addition, such damage or destruction, particularly those that directly impact our technology centers or our vendors or customers could have an impact on our sales, supply chain, production capability, costs, and our ability to provide services to our customers.
Although we currently maintain general property damage insurance, we do not maintain insurance for loss from earthquakes, acts of terrorism or war. If we incur losses from uninsured events, we could incur significant expenses which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
If we lose key personnel or qualified technical staff, our ability to manage the day-to-day aspects of our business will be adversely affected.
We believe that the attraction and retention of qualified personnel is critical to our success. If we lose key personnel or are unable to recruit qualified personnel, our ability to manage the day-to-day aspects of our business will be adversely affected. Our operations and prospects depend in large part on the performance of our senior management team and the managers of our principal operating divisions. The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team, in particular, Mr. Chandramohan, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Suriyakumar, our President and Chief Operating Officer, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
17
If we are required to write down our goodwill, our operations and stockholders equity would be adversely affected.
As described in the notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, we have $245 million of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2004. Goodwill arises when we pay more for a business than the fair market value of the acquired tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. Until January 1, 2002, we amortized this goodwill on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Under accounting rules that we adopted beginning January 1, 2002, we are no longer able to amortize goodwill on a yearly basis. Instead, we are required to periodically determine if our goodwill has become impaired, in which case we would be required to write off the impaired portion of goodwill. The amount of goodwill that we would write off in any given year is treated as a charge against earnings under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. If we are required to write off our goodwill, we could incur significant charges against earnings, which would adversely affect our results of operations and stockholders equity.
We have substantial debt and have the ability to incur additional debt. The principal and interest payment obligations of such debt may restrict our future operations and adversely affect our business.
As of June 30, 2004, assuming that this offering and the application of the net proceeds from this offering as described under Use of Proceeds had been completed by that date, we would have had approximately $267 million of outstanding indebtedness. In addition, the credit agreements governing our credit facilities permit us to incur additional debt under certain circumstances.
The incurrence of substantial amounts of debt may make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations; require us to dedicate a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal due under our debt, which will reduce funds available for other business purposes; increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; place us at a competitive disadvantage compared with some of our competitors that have less debt; and limit our ability to obtain additional financing required to fund working capital and capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.
Our ability to satisfy our obligations and to reduce our total debt depends on our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow, and future financings may not be available to provide sufficient net proceeds to meet these obligations or to successfully execute our business strategy.
The agreements governing our credit facilities impose restrictions on our business.
The credit agreements for our senior secured credit facilities contain, and other agreements we may enter into in the future may contain, covenants imposing significant restrictions on our business. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. These covenants place restrictions on our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt, create liens, make investments, enter into transactions with affiliates, sell assets, guarantee debt, declare or pay dividends, redeem common stock or make other distributions to stockholders, and consolidate or merge. See Description of Certain Indebtedness.
Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial, and industry conditions. An event of default under our debt
18
Being a public company will increase our expenses and administrative workload.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, our administrative staff will be required to perform additional tasks. For example, in anticipation of becoming a public company, we will have created or revised the roles and duties of our board committees, adopted additional internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, retained a transfer agent and a financial printer, adopted an insider trading policy and will have all of the internal and external costs of preparing and distributing periodic public reports in compliance with our obligations under the securities laws. We also expect that being a public company and these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers.
We will be exposed to risks relating to evaluations of controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. We will be evaluating our internal controls systems to allow management to report on, and our independent auditors to attest to, our internal controls. We will be performing the system and process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required to comply with the management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, we expect to incur substantial additional expenses and diversion of managements time. While we anticipate being able to fully implement the requirements relating to internal controls and all other aspects of Section 404 by our December 31, 2005 deadline, we cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or the impact of the same on our operations since there is presently no precedent available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or the NYSE. Any such action could adversely affect our financial results or investors confidence in our company, and could cause our stock price to fall.
Our operations subject us to potential environmental liabilities.
Our printing operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws, and regulations relating to the environment. Such environmental regulations may affect us by restricting the use of certain products or regulating their disposal and regulatory or legislative changes may cause future increases in our operating costs or otherwise affect our operations. Although we believe we are and have been in substantial compliance with such regulations, there is no assurance that in the future we may not be adversely affected by such regulations or incur increased operating costs in complying with such regulations.
Our operations involve some use of hazardous substances and the generation of wastes, primarily toner, which could have adverse environmental impacts if released into the environment. Environmental regulations impose obligations on various entities to clean up contaminated properties or to pay for the cost of such remediation, often upon parties that did not actually cause the
19
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for shares of our common stock. An active public trading market for our common stock may not develop or, if it develops, may not be maintained after this offering, and the market price could fall below the initial public offering price. Factors such as quarterly variations in our financial results, announcements by us or others, developments affecting us, our customers and our suppliers, acquisition of products or businesses by us or our competitors, and general market volatility could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. As a result, you could lose all or part of your investment. Our company, the selling stockholders, and the representatives of the underwriters will negotiate to determine the initial public offering price. The initial public offering price may be higher than the trading price of our common stock following this offering.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware corporate law may make it difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our current board of directors and could deter an unsolicited third party acquisition offer, which may adversely affect the marketability and market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and in Delaware corporate law will make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors, which consequently will make it difficult to change the composition of management. In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management and board of directors. Public stockholders who might desire to participate in this type of transaction may not have an opportunity to do so. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public stockholders to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Our board of directors can issue preferred stock without stockholder approval of the terms of such stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize our board of directors, without stockholder approval, to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the preferred stock, including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preference, sinking fund terms, subscription rights, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of a series. Our board of directors will be able to issue preferred stock with voting and conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock, without stockholder approval. At the completion of this offering, no shares of preferred stock will be outstanding and we have no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.
20
Shares available for sale and future stock sales could decrease the market price of our stock.
Sales of shares of our common stock in the public market following this offering, or the perception that sales may occur, could depress the market price of our common stock. After this offering, we will have shares of common stock outstanding. The number of shares of common stock available for sale in the public market is temporarily limited by restrictions under federal securities law and under lock-up agreements that our directors, executive officers, the selling stockholders, and the holders of substantially all other shares of our common stock have entered into with the underwriters. Those lock-up agreements restrict these persons from disposing of or hedging their shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable for their shares until 180 days after the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. However, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. may release all or any portion of the shares from the restrictions of the lock-up agreements. All of the shares sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, except for any shares purchased by our affiliates (as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act). The remaining shares outstanding after this offering will be available for sale into the public market after the expiration of the initial 180-day lock-up period, except for any shares purchased by our affiliates (as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act). Additional shares of common stock underlying options will become available for sale in the public market. We expect to file a registration statement on Form S-8 that will register approximately 5.8 million shares of common stock, including shares of common stock issuable under our stock plans.
As restrictions on resale end, our stock price could drop significantly if the holders of these restricted shares sell them or the market perceives they intend to sell them. These sales may also make it more difficult for us to sell securities in the future at a time and at a price we deem appropriate.
Because a limited number of stockholders control the majority of the voting power of our common stock, investors in this offering will not be able to determine the outcome of stockholder votes.
Following this offering, our executive officers, directors, Code, Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., and their affiliated entities will control % of the voting power of our common stock, or % if the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full. So long as these stockholders continue to hold, directly or indirectly, shares of common stock representing more than 50% of the voting power of our common stock, they will be able to direct the election of all of the members of our board of directors who will determine our strategic plans and financing decisions and appoint senior management. These stockholders will also be able to determine the outcome of substantially all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, including matters involving mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions resulting in a change in control of our company. These stockholders do not have any obligation to us to either retain or dispose of our common stock. They may seek to cause us to take courses of action that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment in us, but which might involve risks to other holders of our common stock or adversely affect us or other investors, including investors in this offering.
You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering.
The initial public offering price will be substantially higher than the book value per share of our common stock. As a result, purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $ per share in the tangible book value of the common stock from the assumed initial public offering price of $ . In addition, to the extent that currently outstanding options to purchase common stock at a price per share less than our tangible net book value per share are exercised, there will be further dilution.
21
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements, as defined by federal securities laws, with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business, and our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Words such as, but not limited to, believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, intend, plan, targets, likely, will, would, could, and similar expressions or phrases identify forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The occurrence of the events described, and the achievement of the expected results, depend on many events, some or all of which are not predictable or within our control. Actual results may differ materially from expected results.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ from expected results include, among others:
| general economic conditions and the level of construction activity; |
| competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors; |
| our failure to anticipate and adapt to future changes in our industry; |
| uncertainty regarding our product and service innovations; |
| the inability to charge for our value-added services to offset potential declines in print volumes; |
| adverse developments affecting the State of California, including general and local economic conditions, macroeconomic trends, and natural disasters; |
| our inability to successfully identify and manage our acquisitions or open new branches; |
| our inability to successfully manage our dual operating structure and uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of financial and management policies and procedures we established to improve accounting controls; |
| adverse developments concerning our relationships with certain key vendors; |
| our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property and litigation regarding intellectual property; |
| acts of terrorism, violence, war, natural disaster or other circumstances that cause damage or disruption to us, our facilities, our technology centers, our vendors or a majority of our customers; |
| the loss of key personnel or qualified technical staff; |
| the potential writedown of goodwill we have recorded in connection with our acquisitions; |
| the availability of cash to operate and expand our business as planned and to service our debt; |
| the increased expenses and administrative workload associated with being a public company; |
| risks relating to evaluations of controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; and |
| potential environmental liabilities. |
All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We undertake no obligation, and specifically decline any obligation, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this prospectus might not occur.
See the section entitled Risk Factors for a more complete discussion of these risks and uncertainties and for other risks and uncertainties. These factors and the other risk factors described
22
23
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately $104.5 million from the sale of shares of common stock by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), after deducting estimated underwriting commissions and discounts and estimated expenses and assuming no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
We anticipate using the net proceeds to us from this offering as follows (as if the proceeds were applied as of June 30, 2004):
| approximately $26.8 million to repurchase our preferred equity, including accrued interest, which becomes payable upon our initial public offering; |
| approximately $49.9 million to repay a portion of our $225 million senior second priority secured term loan facility, which has a maturity date of December 2009 and bears interest at a floating rate which was 8.625% as of September 1, 2004; and |
| the balance of approximately $27.8 million to repay a portion of our $100 million senior first priority secured term loan facility, which has a maturity date of June 2009 and bears interest at a floating rate which was 4.179% as of September 1, 2004. |
Pending application of the balance of the net proceeds described above, we plan to invest such balance in short and medium-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common equity. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to compliance with certain covenants under our credit facilities, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
REORGANIZATION
Immediately prior to this offering, we will reorganize from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics Company. In the reorganization:
| each common unit of Holdings will be exchanged for one share of our common stock; |
| each Holdings option will be exchanged for an option exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings option and with the same exercise price and vesting terms as the Holdings option; and |
| each Holdings warrant will become exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings warrant and on the same terms as the Holdings warrant. |
Pursuant to the operating agreement of Holdings, cash distributions are to be made to members of Holdings to provide them with funds to pay taxes that the members will owe for their share of our profits as a limited liability company through the date of our reorganization, calculated at the highest combined federal and state income tax rate applicable for tax withholding purposes, currently 43%. Accordingly, immediately prior to our reorganization, we will make a cash distribution to all members of Holdings of the estimated amount due the members with respect to such taxes in the amount of approximately $596,000. Within approximately 45 days after the closing of this
24
CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
On October 24, 2003, Holdings board of advisors determined to no longer use the audit services of Ernst & Young LLP and approved the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the subsequent interim period through October 24, 2003, we did not consult with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
The reports of Ernst & Young LLP on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or a qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During our fiscal years 2001 and 2002 and the subsequent interim period through October 24, 2003, there were no disagreements between Ernst & Young LLP and us on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP would have caused it to make reference thereto in its reports on the financial statements for such period. There has been no matter that was the subject of a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
We have provided Ernst & Young LLP with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested that Ernst & Young LLP furnish us with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not Ernst & Young LLP agrees with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated October 15, 2004, is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
25
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated capitalization as of June 30, 2004:
| on an actual basis; |
| on a pro forma basis to reflect the reorganization of our company from a limited liability company to a corporation prior to the completion of this offering (see Reorganization); and |
| on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect the sale of shares of our common stock by us in this offering and the application of the net proceeds as described under Use of Proceeds. |
This table should be read in conjunction with
Reorganization, Use of Proceeds,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and our consolidated
financial statements, including the related notes, appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
As of June 30, 2004
Pro Forma
Actual
Pro Forma
As Adjusted
(Dollars in thousands)
$
16,809
$
6,307
$
6,307
$
321,696
$
321,696
$
244,385
9,230
9,230
9,230
26,773
26,773
2,438
2,438
2,438
360,137
360,137
256,053
28,529
35
35
28,494
132,994
(2,134
)
(2,134
)
(2,134
)
(66,610
)
(60,596
)
(62,767
)
136
136
136
(40,079
)
(34,065
)
68,264
$
320,058
$
326,072
$
324,317
(1) | Reflects the payment of $10.5 million to the CHS Entities in connection with our reorganization, but does not reflect the $596,000 distribution in respect to taxes. See Reorganization. |
26
(2) | At June 30, 2004, our senior secured credit facilities consisted of two facilities: (i) a $130 million senior first priority secured facility, consisting of a $100 million term loan facility, of which $99.8 million was outstanding at June 30, 2004, and a $30 million revolving credit facility, none of which was outstanding at June 30, 2004; and (ii) a $225 million senior second priority secured term facility of which $225.0 million was outstanding at June 30, 2004. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, we repaid $11.6 million of our senior second priority secured term facility. We intend to apply the net proceeds from this offering to repay approximately $49.9 million of our second priority secured facility and the balance of approximately $27.8 million to repay a portion of our first priority secured facility. See Use of Proceeds. |
(3) | Holdings issued 20,000 redeemable preferred units in connection with the 2000 recapitalization. Holders of such preferred units are entitled to an investment return of 13.25% per annum for periods prior to April 10, 2003 and 15.0% per annum thereafter. A portion of the investment return is distributed quarterly under a formula which takes into account federal and certain state and local income tax rates applicable to such investment return. The unpaid portion of the investment return accumulates annually and will be payable upon any redemption or repurchase of the preferred units. Pursuant to the terms of Holdings operating agreement, on the closing date of the offering, we will use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to repurchase all outstanding preferred units. The total amount we expect to pay to repurchase such preferred units, including the unpaid portion of the investment return, is approximately $26.8 million. |
(4) | The seller notes were issued in connection with certain acquisitions, with interest rates ranging between 7.0% and 8.0% and maturities between 2004 and 2007. |
(5) | Accumulated earnings from inception includes the income tax effects of the reorganization which will result in an income tax benefit and distributions to members of $16.5 million |
(6) | The deficit of $40.1 million, as of June 30, 2004, includes $88.8 million in cash distributions to Holdings common unit holders made in connection with the 2000 recapitalization. |
27
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock upon the completion of this offering.
On a pro forma basis to give effect to our reorganization as Delaware corporation, as described in Reorganization, our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2004 equaled approximately $(285.2) million, or $(8.04) per share of common stock. Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock offered by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our net tangible book value, as adjusted, as of June 30, 2004 would have equaled approximately $ million, or $ per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $ per share to new investors of common stock in this offering. The following table illustrates this per share dilution to new investors purchasing our common stock in this offering.
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
$ | ||||||||
Net tangible book value per share at
June 30, 2004
|
(8.04 | ) | |||||||
Increase in net tangible value per share
attributable to this offering
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Net tangible book value per share after this
offering
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Dilution per common share to new investors
|
$ | ||||||||
|
The following table summarizes the differences
between our existing stockholders and new investors, as of
June 30, 2004, with respect to the number of shares of
common stock issued by us, the total consideration paid and the
average price per share paid. The calculations with respect to
common shares purchased by new investors in this offering
reflect the initial public offering price of
$ per share before deducting the
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
Average
Shares Purchased
Total Consideration
Price
Per
Number
Percent
Amount
Percent
Share
35,487,511
%
$
168,954,000
%
$
4.76
100
%
$
100
%
The discussion and tables above assume no exercise of any of the stock options to purchase 1,657,000 shares with exercise prices ranging from $4.88 to $5.85 per share and a weighted average exercise price of $5.18 per share outstanding at June 30, 2004. If all our outstanding options at June 30, 2004 had been exercised, the net tangible book value per share, as adjusted, would have been $(7.68) per share, representing an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $0.36 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $ per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering.
If the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full, sales by the selling stockholders in this offering will reduce the number of shares of common stock held by existing stockholders to shares or approximately % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding upon the closing of this offering and will increase the number of shares held by new public investors to shares or approximately % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering. See Principal and Selling Stockholders.
28
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The selected historical and unaudited pro forma
financial data presented below are derived from the audited
financial statements of Holdings for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, and the
unaudited financial statements of Holdings for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004. The selected
historical financial data for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2003 and 2004 are derived from unaudited interim
financial statements which, in the opinion of management,
include all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to state
fairly the data included therein in accordance with GAAP for
interim financial information, except for pro forma data.
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the entire fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma
financial data set forth below give effect to our conversion to
a Delaware corporation and the completion of this offering, as
described in Use of Proceeds. The unaudited pro
forma financial data are not necessarily indicative of our
financial position or results of operations that might have
occurred had the transactions they give effect to been completed
as of the dates indicated and do not purport to represent what
our financial position or results of operations might be for any
future period or date. The financial data set forth below should
be read in conjunction with Capitalization,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our audited
financial statements and unaudited financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
223,836
$
351,099
$
420,701
$
418,924
$
415,960
$
214,154
$
226,133
134,531
201,390
243,710
247,778
252,028
127,311
130,790
89,305
149,709
176,991
171,146
163,932
86,843
95,343
53,730
83,139
102,576
101,805
101,252
51,044
55,264
2,823
3,966
5,731
218
131
67
54
20,544
6,232
1,428
1,500
3,438
32,752
35,828
63,818
67,623
62,549
35,732
40,025
638
713
304
541
1,024
731
567
(9,215
)
(29,238
)
(47,530
)
(39,917
)
(39,390
)
(18,116
)
(16,248
)
(1,195
)
(14,921
)
24,175
6,108
16,592
28,247
9,262
18,347
24,344
4,068
4,784
5,802
6,304
4,321
3,641
5,174
20,107
1,324
10,790
21,943
4,941
14,706
19,170
(2,158
)
(3,107
)
(3,291
)
(1,730
)
(1,730
)
20,107
(834
)
7,683
18,652
3,211
12,976
19,170
5,304
2,618
2,622
6,275
1,407
4,305
5,937
$
14,803
$
(3,452
)
$
5,061
$
12,377
$
1,804
$
8,671
$
13,233
29
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
$
0.60
$
(0.10
)
$
0.14
$
0.34
$
0.05
$
0.24
$
0.37
$
0.60
$
(0.10
)
$
0.14
$
0.34
$
0.05
$
0.24
$
0.35
24,571
35,308
36,629
36,406
35,480
35,473
35,488
24,571
35,371
36,758
36,723
37,298
35,999
37,440
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
33,390
$
35,346
$
64,122
$
68,164
$
48,652
$
36,463
$
40,592
$
42,932
$
50,288
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
67,011
$
45,878
$
49,215
$
42,932
$
72,027
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
81,932
$
45,878
$
49,215
$
9,542
$
14,942
$
25,372
$
17,898
$
18,359
$
9,415
$
8,623
$
3,877
$
5,228
$
8,659
$
5,209
$
4,992
$
1,817
$
3,427
$
9,215
$
29,238
$
47,530
$
39,917
$
39,390
$
18,116
$
16,248
As of December 31,
As of
June 30,
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
15,814
$
31,565
$
29,110
$
24,995
$
17,315
$
16,809
$
204,464
$
358,026
$
371,948
$
395,677
$
376,843
$
389,133
$
123,951
$
359,746
$
371,515
$
378,102
$
360,008
$
360,137
$
32,422
$
(80,478
)
$
(78,900
)
$
(59,784
)
$
(57,329
)
$
(40,079
)
$
15,379
$
34,742
$
24,338
$
24,371
$
16,809
$
32,870
(1) | Until our reorganization, which will be effective prior to the closing of this offering, a substantial portion of our business will continue to operate as a limited liability company, or LLC, and taxed as a partnership. As a result, the members of the LLC pay the income taxes on the earnings. The unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision amounts reflected in the table above were calculated as if our reorganization became effective on January 1, 1999. |
(2) | EBIT is a non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest expense and income taxes. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that represents earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. We believe that EBIT and EBITDA are, and will continue to be, financial measures useful to financial analysts and to the lending community because they are generally used in analyzing the operating performance of a company and its ability to service debt and otherwise meet its cash needs. EBIT and EBITDA, however, are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity. Since EBIT and EBITDA are not measures determined in accordance with GAAP and, thus, are susceptible to varying interpretations and calculations, EBIT and EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Neither EBIT nor EBITDA represents an amount of funds that is available for managements discretionary use. |
30
(3) | The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA, and pro forma net income: |
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
$ | 28,569 | $ | 28,054 | $ | 53,151 | $ | 56,413 | $ | 48,237 | $ | 26,922 | $ | 28,515 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
242 | (95 | ) | (533 | ) | (5,482 | ) | (4,860 | ) | 1,503 | 1,247 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncash expenses, including depreciation and
amortization(5)
|
(8,704 | ) | (26,635 | ) | (41,828 | ) | (28,988 | ) | (38,436 | ) | (13,719 | ) | (10,592 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision
|
4,068 | 4,784 | 5,802 | 6,304 | 4,321 | 3,641 | 5,174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
9,215 | 29,238 | 47,530 | 39,917 | 39,390 | 18,116 | 16,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
EBIT
|
33,390 | 35,346 | 64,122 | 68,164 | 48,652 | 36,463 | 40,592 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
9,542 | 14,942 | 25,372 | 17,898 | 18,359 | 9,415 | 8,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
42,932 | 50,288 | 89,494 | 86,062 | 67,011 | 45,878 | 49,215 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(9,215 | ) | (29,238 | ) | (47,530 | ) | (39,917 | ) | (39,390 | ) | (18,116 | ) | (16,248 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision and unaudited pro forma
incremental income tax provision(1)
|
(9,372 | ) | (7,402 | ) | (8,424 | ) | (12,579 | ) | (5,728 | ) | (7,946 | ) | (11,111 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization(5)
|
(9,542 | ) | (14,942 | ) | (25,372 | ) | (17,898 | ) | (18,359 | ) | (9,415 | ) | (8,623 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Dividends and amortization of discount on
preferred members equity
|
| (2,158 | ) | (3,107 | ) | (3,291 | ) | (1,730 | ) | (1,730 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss)
attributable to common members
|
$ | 14,803 | $ | (3,452 | ) | $ | 5,061 | $ | 12,377 | $ | 1,804 | $ | 8,671 | $ | 13,233 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) | Adjusted EBITDA refers to our EBITDA, adjusted to exclude the impact of (i) costs incurred in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and (ii) loss on early extinguishments of debt. We believe that adjustment for these items is recognized by the industry in which we operate to be relevant as a supplementary non-GAAP financial measure widely used by financial analysts and others in our industry to meaningfully evaluate a companys operating performance and ability to comply with its applicable debt covenants. We also use adjusted EBITDA to measure and pay annual management bonuses. |
In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future, we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. | |
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to adjusted EBITDA: |
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
$ | 42,932 | $ | 50,288 | $ | 89,494 | $ | 86,062 | $ | 67,011 | $ | 45,878 | $ | 49,215 | |||||||||||||||
Costs incurred in connection with the 2000
recapitalization
|
| 20,544 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
| 1,195 | | | 14,921 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$ | 42,932 | $ | 72,027 | $ | 89,494 | $ | 86,062 | $ | 81,932 | $ | 45,878 | $ | 49,215 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) | Depreciation and amortization includes a write-off of intangible assets of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. |
(6) | In July 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 150,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. In accordance with SFAS No. 150, the redeemable preferred equity of Holdings has been reclassified in our financial statements as a component of our total debt upon our adoption of this new standard. The redeemable preferred equity amounted to $25.8 million as of December 31, 2003 and $26.8 million as of June 30, 2004. SFAS No. 150 does not permit the restatement of financial statements for periods prior to the adoption of this standard. |
(7) | Redeemable common membership units amounted to $6.0 million and $8.1 million at December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively. |
(8) | The decline in total members equity (deficit) from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000 was a result of an $88.8 million cash distribution to Holdings common unit holders in connection with the 2000 recapitalization and the reclassification of $20.3 million of preferred equity issued in connection with the 2000 recapitalization upon the adoption of SFAS No. 150 in July 2003. |
31
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in forward-looking statements. See Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. We also provide these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as the technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality industries, that also require sophisticated document management services. The business-to-business services we provide to our customers include document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand . We provide our core services through industry leading technology and innovation, a sophisticated network of 173 locally branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs at our customers locations. We also sell reprographics equipment and supplies to complement our full range of service offerings. In further support of our core services, we license our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship online planroom, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our net sales were $416.0 million, of which approximately half were derived from our operations in California.
Factors Affecting Financial Performance
Based on a review of the top 30% of our customers, representing approximately 90% of our net sales, and designating our customers as either AEC or non-AEC based on their primary use of our services, we believe that sales to the AEC market accounted for approximately 80% of our year to date net sales through August 31, 2004, with the remaining 20% consisting of sales to non-AEC markets. As a result, our operating results and financial condition are significantly impacted by various economic factors affecting the AEC industry, such as non-residential construction spending, GDP growth, interest rates, employment rates, office vacancy rates, and government expenditures. Similar to the AEC industry, we believe that the reprographics industry typically lags the recovery in the broader economy by approximately six months.
Key Financial Measures
The following key financial measures are used by our management to operate and assess the performance of our business: net sales, EBIT, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and costs and expenses.
Net Sales
Net sales represent total sales less returns, discounts and allowances. These sales consist of document management services, document distribution and logistics services, print-on-demand services, reprographics equipment and supplies, software licenses and PEiR memberships. We generate sales by individual orders through commissioned sales personnel and, in some cases, pursuant to national contracts. Our document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services, including the use of PlanWell by our customers, are typically invoiced to a customer as part of a per square foot printing cost.
In 2003, our print-on-demand services represented approximately 76% of our net sales, facilities management revenues represented approximately 14%, and sales of reprographics equipment and supplies represented approximately 10%. Although our PlanWell and other software
32
We identify reportable segments based on how management internally evaluates financial information, business activities and management responsibility. On that basis, we operate in a single reportable business segment.
To a large extent, our continued engagement by our customers for successive jobs depends upon the customers satisfaction with the quality of services that we provide. Our customer orders tend to be of a short-run, but recurring, nature. Since we do not operate with a backlog, it is difficult for us to predict the number, size and profitability of reprographics work that we expect to undertake more than a few weeks in advance.
EBIT, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA
EBIT, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA (and related ratios presented in this prospectus) are supplemental measures of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP. EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, income from operations, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.
EBIT represents net income before interest and taxes. EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted to exclude the impact of costs incurred in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and loss on early extinguishment of debt. We present EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because we consider them important supplemental measures of our performance and believe they are frequently used by securities analysts, investors, lenders and other interested parties in the evaluation of business services companies, many of which present EBITDA and/or Adjusted EBITDA when reporting their results. Our presentation of these measures should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
We also use EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the following purposes: to measure the performance of our operating units, to control cash remittances from our branches, to evaluate potential acquisitions, to evaluate whether to incur capital expenditures, and to determine our compliance with the covenants in our credit agreements. We further use EBIT to measure performance and determine compensation at the division level, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to measure performance and determine compensation at the consolidated level.
We calculate Adjusted EBITDA by adjusting EBITDA to eliminate the impact of a number of items we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operations and for the other reasons noted above. You are encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and whether you consider it appropriate. In addition, in evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
| they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
| they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
| they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debts; |
33
| although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; |
| Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations, as discussed in our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus; and |
| other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. |
Because of these limitations, EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or reduce our indebtedness. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. For more information, see our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Costs and Expenses
Our cost of sales consists primarily of paper, toner and other consumables, labor, and maintenance, repair, rental and insurance costs associated with operating our facilities and equipment, along with depreciation charges. Paper cost is the most significant component of our material cost; however, paper pricing typically does not impact our operating margins because changes in paper pricing are generally passed on to our customers. We closely monitor material cost as a percentage of net sales to measure volume and waste. We also track labor utilization, or net sales per employee, to measure productivity and determine staffing levels.
We maintain low inventory balances as well as low levels of other working capital requirements. In addition, capital expenditure requirements are low as most facilities and equipment are leased, with overall capital spending averaging approximately 1.5% of annual net sales over the last three years. Since we typically lease our reprographics equipment for periods averaging between three and five years, we are able to upgrade our equipment in response to rapid changes in technology.
Our selling expenses generally include the salaries and commissions paid to our sales professionals, along with promotional, travel and entertainment costs. Our general and administrative expenses generally include the salaries and benefits paid to support personnel at our reprographics businesses and our corporate staff, as well as office rent, utilities, insurance and communications expenses, and various professional services.
Our general and administrative expenses also include management fees paid to CHS Management IV, L.P. in accordance with a management agreement entered into in connection with our recapitalization in 2000. These management fees, which may not exceed $1 million in any year, amounted to $803,000 during 2001, $889,000 during 2002, $858,000 during 2003, $415,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2003, and $413,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004. The management agreement will be terminated upon the completion of this offering.
Income Taxes
Holdings and Opco, through which a substantial portion of our business is operated, are limited liability companies which are taxed as partnerships. As a result, the members of Holdings pay income taxes on the earnings of Opco, which are passed through to Holdings. Certain divisions are consolidated in Holdings and are treated as separate corporate entities for income tax purposes (the consolidated corporations). These consolidated corporations pay income tax and record provisions for income taxes in their financial statements. Following the reorganization of our company to a Delaware corporation, our earnings will be subject to federal, state and local taxes at a combined statutory rate of approximately 43%.
34
Members Deficit and Capital Accounts
Our members deficit of $40.1 million as of June 30, 2004 includes $88.8 million in cash distributions to our common unit holders made in connection with our recapitalization in 2000 and previous cash distributions made to the members of Holdings to provide them with funds to pay taxes owed for their share of our profits as a limited liability company.
Immediately prior to our reorganization, we will make a cash distribution to all members of Holdings of the estimated amount due the members with respect to such taxes in the amount of approximately $596,000. After the closing of this offering, when the members final tax liability has been calculated, we will make a final payment for the balance, if any, due to the members. In addition, certain of our members, Code Hennessey & Simmons IV, L.P. and ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. (the CHS Entities), have in the past received less than their proportionate share of distributions for such taxes and are owed a distribution of approximately $10.5 million, which we will pay immediately prior to our reorganization. We may also make a further distribution to the CHS Entities after the closing of this offering if the estimated payment to the CHS Entities did not fully offset such shortfall.
Acquisitions
Our financial results during the periods discussed below were impacted by the acquisition of 14 reprographics businesses in 2001 for a total purchase price of $32.6 million, eight acquisitions in 2002 for a total purchase price of $34.4 million, four acquisitions in 2003 for a total purchase price of $870,000 and three acquisitions in the six months ended June 30, 2004 for a total purchase price of $1.4 million. Because each acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, our consolidated income statements reflect sales and expenses of acquired businesses only for post-acquisition periods. For more details regarding these acquisitions, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
In connection with certain large acquisitions, we have made certain payments to employees of the acquired companies and our management that could not be capitalized and included in goodwill because such payments represented compensation expense. These expenses are reflected in the expense line item titled Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities within our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and rely on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances to determine such estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. We believe the critical accounting policies and areas that require more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements to be: revenue recognition; goodwill and other intangible assets; impairment of long-lived assets; allowance for doubtful accounts; inventory reserves; and commitments and contingencies.
Revenue Recognition
We apply the provisions of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements filed with the SEC. SAB No. 104 outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies. In general, we recognize revenue
35
We recognize revenues from reprographics services when services have been rendered while revenues from the resale of reprographics supplies and equipment are recognized upon shipment. Revenues from software licensing activities are recognized over the term of the license. Revenues from membership fees are recognized over the term of the membership agreement.
Management provides for returns, discounts and allowances based on historic experience and adjusts such allowances as considered necessary. To date, such provisions have been within the range of managements expectations.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which requires, among other things, the use of a nonamortization approach for purchased goodwill and certain intangibles. Under a nonamortization approach, goodwill and intangibles having an indefinite life are not amortized, but instead will be reviewed for impairment at least annually or if an event occurs or circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level.
SFAS 142 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
We have selected September 30 as the date on which we will perform our annual goodwill impairment test. Based on our valuation of goodwill, no impairment charges related to the write-down of goodwill were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003. During the year ended December 31, 2001, we wrote-off $3.4 million of goodwill recorded from an acquisition completed during 2000 because the business was closed in 2001 due to underperformance.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically assess potential impairments of our long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. An impairment review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered by us include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; and significant negative industry or economic trends. When we determine that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we estimate the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows and eventual disposition is less than the carrying amount of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss. An
36
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We perform periodic credit evaluations of the financial condition of our customers, monitor collections and payments from customers, and generally do not require collateral. Receivables are generally due within 30 days. We provide for the possible inability to collect accounts receivable by recording an allowance for doubtful accounts. We write-off an account when it is considered to be uncollectible. We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical experience, aging of accounts receivable, and information regarding the creditworthiness of our customers. To date, uncollectible amounts have been within the range of managements expectations.
Inventory Reserves
On an ongoing basis, inventories are reviewed and written down for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventories equal to the difference between the costs of inventories and the estimated net realizable value. Charges to increase inventory reserves are recorded as an increase in cost of sales.
Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, we estimate
potential future loss accruals related to legal, tax and other
contingencies. These accruals require managements judgment
on the outcome of various events based on the best available
information. However, due to changes in facts and circumstances,
the ultimate outcomes could be different than managements
estimates.
Results of Operations
The following table provides information on the
percentages of certain items of selected financial data compared
to net sales for the periods indicated:
As a Percentage of Net Sales
Six Months
Year Ended
Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(unaudited)
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
57.9
59.1
60.6
59.4
57.8
42.1
40.9
39.4
40.6
42.2
24.4
24.3
24.3
23.8
24.4
1.4
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.8
15.2
16.1
15.1
16.8
17.8
37
As a Percentage of Net Sales (Continued)
Six Months
Year Ended
Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(unaudited)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
(11.3
)
(9.5
)
(9.5
)
(8.5
)
(7.2
)
(3.6
)
3.9
6.7
2.2
8.6
10.8
(1.4
)
(1.5
)
(1.0
)
(1.7
)
(2.3
)
2.5
%
5.2
%
1.2
%
6.9
%
8.5
%
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $12.0 million, or 5.6%, to $226.1 million from $214.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the improvement of the U.S. economy in the Western United States, acquisition activity, the expansion of our revenue base through the opening of new branches, and by increasing our market share in certain markets. Of the $12.0 million increase in our 2004 net sales, $4.8 million was attributable to our acquisition activity during 2003 and 2004.
Net sales for the six months ended June 30 2004 from our Southern California divisions increased 7.4% compared to the same period in 2003. This was driven by our efforts to capture market share combined with a strong local economy.
Net sales derived from our divisions located in Northern California increased 8.1% in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003, due to improving economic conditions, business derived from new markets we entered, and increased market share.
Net sales from our divisions in the Southern United States increased 10.5% in the six months ended June 30, 2004 over the same period in 2003 driven by strong construction activity in Las Vegas and Tampa. These gains were partially offset by a 2.2% decline in net sales from our Houston divisions due to weak AEC activity in that market as a result of local corporate scandals that created an abundance of vacant office space.
Net sales from our Midwest divisions declined 7.1% in the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 due to the continued softness in the manufacturing economy coupled with high unemployment rates in this regions major markets.
Net sales from our Northeast divisions increased 6.8% due to new business gained from the purchase of customers from a competitor that filed bankruptcy in New York in 2003. Excluding this purchase, net sales in the Northeast declined 1.1% due to the continued sluggish AEC economy in the Northeast since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $8.5 million to $95.3 million from $86.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 due primarily to the increase in our net sales coupled with the fixed cost nature of our leases for production equipment and facilities. Our gross margin improved by approximately 1.6 percentage points to 42.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to 40.6% in the comparable 2003 period. We were able to reduce our material cost as a percentage of net sales from 16.2% in the 2003 period to 15.6% in the 2004 period due to a negotiated reduction in the cost of material from one of our major vendors, coupled with better waste control procedures. Production labor cost as a percentage of net sales declined from 21.1% in the 2003 period to 20.7% in the 2004 period due to better staffing
38
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased 8.4% to $55.3 million from $51.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. This was primarily due to higher sales commissions related to increased sales and higher incentive bonus accruals during 2004 compared to 2003 related to improved operating results. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased slightly to 24.5% from 23.8% in the comparable 2003 period. This increase reflected our larger sales force and increased selling and marketing activities during 2004 as we continued to pursue market share expansion. We also continued to make investments in personnel training and education.
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased 10.5% to $16.2 million from $18.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 due to the refinancing of our debt in December 2003, which lowered our overall effective interest rate in 2004 by approximately 1.8 percentage points. Also, since June 30, 2003, we reduced our outstanding debt by $45.7 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the interest benefit from our interest rate swap contracts was $3.0 million. The interest rate swap contracts expired in September 2003, and we entered into a new interest rate hedge in September 2003. This hedge instrument is accounted for as a hedge, and fluctuations in the market value of the hedge do not impact our income statement.
Income Taxes. We provided for income taxes of $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, as compared to $3.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to higher pretax income at the consolidated corporations. Our overall effective income tax rate for the 2004 period decreased slightly to 21.2% compared to 19.8% in the comparable 2003 period.
Net Income. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased 30.3% to $19.2 million from $14.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was primarily related to increased sales resulting from the improvement in the overall U.S. economy, increased AEC activity, as well as our reduced interest expense due to the refinancing of our debt in December 2003.
EBITDA. EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $49.2 million, representing a $3.3 million, or 7.3%, increase from $45.9 million for the same period of 2003. Our EBITDA margin increased to 21.8% in the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to 21.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2003 period primarily due to higher revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to pro forma net income, please see Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures below.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Net Sales. Net sales for 2003 decreased $2.9 million, or 0.7%, to $416.0 million from $418.9 million in 2002, primarily due to the continued slowdown in the economy and the AEC industry, particularly in our Northern California and Northeast divisions, and the continued pricing pressure on our sales due to reduction in activity levels due to contraction in the economy. Our acquisitions in 2002 and 2003 partially offset this negative trend. Excluding the benefit of acquisitions completed in 2002 and 2003, our net sales would have decreased by $19.9 million or 5.1%.
Net sales in our Southern California divisions increased 13.1% primarily due to the acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics in May 2002.
Net sales derived from our divisions located in Northern California declined 12.1% to $77.5 million as a result of the continued soft economy and high commercial vacancy rates created from the continued contraction in the internet and technology sectors.
39
Net sales from our Northeast divisions in 2003 decreased 7.1% compared to 2002 due to the economic slowdown in New York City and Washington, D.C. after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Additionally, our Washington, D.C. division was negatively affected by the entry of another reprographics firm in this market.
Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2003 declined to $163.9 million from $171.1 million during 2002. This decline was mainly due to lower net sales in 2003, particularly in Northern California and the Northeast where aggregate net sales in 2003 declined by $16.1 million, combined with strong pricing pressure which reduced our profit margins. Our overall gross profit margin declined by 1.5 percentage points to 39.4% in 2003 from 40.9% in 2002, driven primarily by the fixed cost nature of our equipment and facility leases. Production overhead as a percentage of net sales, which includes lease and maintenance costs, increased from 17.5% in 2002 to 19.0% in 2003. Additionally, our cost of production labor increased $364,000 due to increased health and workers compensation insurance rates. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our material cost as a percentage of net sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2003 remained flat at $101.3 million, or 24.3% of net sales, compared to $101.8 million in 2002 despite the decrease in our net sales and gross profit because we pursued market share expansion amid difficult industry conditions. As a result, our selling and marketing expenses increased by $1.0 million in 2003 compared to 2002 despite lower net sales in 2003. This was offset by a $2.5 million decrease in general and administrative expenses in 2003, which was primarily due to lower incentive bonus accruals resulting from the decline in our operating results.
Acquisition Costs. There were no costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities during 2003 that could not be capitalized into goodwill, compared to $1.5 million expensed in 2002 related to signing bonuses to the senior management of a division acquired in 2002.
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense increased 1.3% in 2003 to $39.4 million compared to $39.9 million in 2002 due primarily to a net interest benefit from our interest rate swap contracts of $4.0 million in 2003 compared to a net interest benefit of $1.6 million in 2002, which was partially offset by a higher monthly average total debt balance during 2003 compared to 2002. Our monthly average total debt balance was higher during 2003 because of our acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics in May 2002 for which we incurred $20.0 million of net borrowings. The interest benefit related to the interest rate swap contracts was due to the improvement in the market value of the interest rate swap contracts as they moved closer to their expiration dates in September 2003.
Income Taxes. We provided for income taxes of $4.3 million for 2003, as compared to $6.3 million in 2002 primarily due to lower pretax income at the consolidated corporations. Our overall effective income tax rate was 22.3% in 2002 and 21.2% in 2003.
Net Income. We had net income of $4.9 million for 2003 compared to net income of $21.9 million for 2002. The $17.0 million decrease was primarily related to a $14.9 million loss related to the early extinguishment of debt in connection with our debt refinancing in December 2003.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA for 2003 was $67.0 million, representing a $19.1 million, or 22.1%, decrease from $86.1 million for 2002. EBITDA as a percentage of net sales for 2003 decreased to 16.1% from 20.5% for 2002 primarily as a result of the $14.9 million of loss from early extinguishment of debt, which we incurred as part of our debt refinancing in December 2003. Our Adjusted EBITDA for 2003, which excludes this early extinguishment charge, was $81.9 million, or 19.7% of net sales compared to 20.5% for 2002. Our EBITDA margin decreased in 2003 from 2002 primarily because of lower revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to pro forma net income, please see Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures below.
40
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Net Sales. Net sales for 2002 decreased $1.8 million, or 0.4% to $418.9 million from $420.7 million in 2001, despite our acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics and seven other smaller reprographics companies in 2002. Excluding net sales related to businesses acquired during 2002 and 2001, net sales from our operations decreased by approximately $39.1 million, or 10.0%. The decrease in net sales was attributable to the continued downturn in the economy generally and the AEC industry and continued pricing pressure on our sales.
Excluding 2002 acquisitions, our divisions located in Southern California, Northern California, the Pacific Northwest, and the Northeast each reported net sales declines in 2002 of 4.5%, 13.5%, 7.3% and 9.6%, respectively, compared to 2001. This decline was attributable to the nationwide softness in the economy, which fueled unemployment and high non-residential vacancy rates.
Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2002 declined to $171.1 million from $177.0 million in 2001. This decline was due primarily to lower net sales in 2002. Our overall gross profit margin declined by 1.2 percentage points to 40.9% in 2002 from 42.1% in 2001, driven primarily by the fixed-cost nature of our leases for production equipment and facilities. Production overhead as a percentage of net sales, which includes lease and maintenance costs, increased from 15.6% in 2001 to 17.5% in 2002. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in our material cost as a percentage of net sales, caused by the lower cost of paper.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2002 decreased 0.8% to $101.8 million from $102.6 million in 2001. Our legal fees in 2002 increased by $0.9 million compared to 2001 as a result of the investigation of our company by the Federal Trade Commission that was triggered by the Consolidated Reprographics acquisition and litigation that we pursued against certain competitors. Both of these matters have been concluded. This increase was offset by cost savings from the elimination of certain redundant administrative offices during late 2001. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses for 2002 decreased slightly to 24.3% from 24.4% in 2001.
Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles for 2002 decreased to $0.2 million from $5.7 million in 2001, due to our discontinuing the amortization of goodwill pursuant to our adoption of SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002. In 2001, we wrote off $3.4 million of goodwill relating to a business acquired in 2000, which was subsequently closed in 2001 due to underperformance.
Acquisition Costs. Costs incurred in connection with acquisition activities for 2002 increased 5.0% to $1.5 million from $1.4 million in 2001. The costs expensed in 2002 represented $1.5 million in signing bonuses to the senior management of a division acquired in 2002. In 2001, these costs represented a bonus paid to the president of a division acquired in 2000. See note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for 2002 decreased 16.0% to $39.9 million from $47.5 million in 2001. This decrease was due to lower average borrowings and interest rates throughout 2002 as compared to 2001 and a net interest benefit from our interest rate swap contracts of $1.6 million compared to a net interest expense from our swap contracts of $5.6 million in 2001. The decrease was partially offset by additional borrowings incurred in May 2002 to finance the acquisition of Consolidated Reprographics, the addition of new capital leases, and higher interest expense from Holdings previously outstanding notes. The benefit from the swap contracts was due to the improvement in the market value of these rate swap contracts in 2002 as they moved closer to their expiration dates in September 2003.
Income Taxes. We provided for income taxes of $6.3 million for 2002, as compared to $5.8 million in 2001 due to higher pretax income at the consolidated corporations. Our overall effective income tax rate for 2002 decreased to 22.3% as compared to 35.0% in 2001 due to the
41
Net Income. Net income for 2002 increased to $21.9 million from $10.8 million in 2001. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million improvement in interest income related to an interest rate swap contract and a decrease of $5.5 million related to discontinuing the amortization of goodwill pursuant to our adoption of SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002.
EBITDA. EBITDA for 2002 was $86.1 million, representing a decrease of $3.4 million, or 3.8%, from $89.5 million for 2001. EBITDA as a percentage of net sales for 2002 decreased to 20.5% from 21.3% for 2001 primarily as a result of lower revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to pro forma net income, please see Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures below.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain quarterly
financial data for the six quarters ended June 30, 2004.
This quarterly information is unaudited, has been prepared on
the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in our
opinion, reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the
information for periods presented. Operating results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future
period.
Quarter Ended
Mar. 31,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
Dec. 31,
Mar. 31,
June 30,
2003
2004
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
$
105,272
$
108,882
$
102,184
$
99,622
$
110,518
$
115,615
$
42,292
$
44,551
$
39,229
$
37,860
$
45,919
$
49,424
$
17,014
$
18,718
$
14,114
$
12,703
$
18,986
$
21,039
$
21,989
$
23,889
$
19,097
$
2,036
$
23,376
$
25,839
$
21,989
$
23,889
$
19,097
$
16,957
$
23,376
$
25,839
$
5,469
$
9,237
$
2,845
$
(12,610
)
$
8,729
$
10,441
The following is a reconciliation of Adjusted
EBITDA and EBITDA to net income (loss) for each respective
quarter.
Quarter Ended
Mar. 31,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
Dec. 31,
Mar. 31,
June 30,
2003
2004
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
$
21,989
$
23,889
$
19,097
$
16,957
$
23,376
$
25,839
(14,921
)
21,989
23,889
19,097
2,036
23,376
25,839
(9,317
)
(8,799
)
(10,842
)
(10,432
)
(7,984
)
(8,264
)
(2,428
)
(1,213
)
(776
)
96
(2,547
)
(2,627
)
(4,775
)
(4,640
)
(4,634
)
(4,310
)
(4,116
)
(4,507
)
$
5,469
$
9,237
$
2,845
$
(12,610
)
$
8,729
$
10,441
We believe that quarterly revenues and operating results may vary significantly in the future and that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. In addition, our quarterly
42
Impact of Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on our
operations. Price increases for raw materials such as paper
typically have been, and we expect will continue to be, passed
on to customers in the ordinary course of business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been cash
provided by operations and borrowings under our bank credit
facilities or debt agreements. Our historical uses of cash have
been for acquisitions of reprographics businesses, payment of
principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, capital
expenditures and tax-related distributions to our LLC members.
Supplemental information pertaining to our historical sources
and uses of cash is presented as follows and should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated statements of cash flows and
notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
43
Our cash position, working capital and debt
obligations as of December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and
June 30, 2004 are shown below and should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated balance sheets and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Debt obligations as of December 31, 2003 and
June 30, 2004 include $25.8 million and
$26.8 million of redeemable preferred equity which has been
reclassified in our financial statements as a component of our
total debt upon our adoption of SFAS No. 150 in
July 2003. Debt obligations as of December 31, 2001
includes $8.2 million of redeemable common membership units.
We believe that our cash flow provided by
operations will be adequate to cover our 2005 working capital
needs, debt service requirements and planned capital
expenditures to the extent such items are known or are
reasonably determinable based on current business and market
conditions. However, we may elect to finance certain of our
capital expenditure requirements through borrowings under our
credit facilities or the issuance of additional debt.
We continually evaluate potential acquisitions.
Absent a compelling strategic reason, we expect that all future
acquisitions will be cash flow accretive within six months.
Currently, we are not party to any agreements or engaged in any
negotiations regarding a material acquisition. We expect to fund
future acquisitions through cash flow provided by operations,
additional borrowings or the issuance of our equity. The extent
to which we will be willing or able to use our equity or a mix
of equity and cash payments to make acquisitions will depend on
the market value of our shares from time to time and the
willingness of potential sellers to accept equity as full or
partial payment.
Debt Obligations
Senior Secured Credit
Facilities.
We have two senior
secured credit facilities: a $130 million senior first
priority secured facility, or first priority facility, and a
$225 million senior second priority secured facility, or
second priority facility. Our first priority facility consists
of a $100 million senior first priority secured term loan
facility, or term facility, and a $30 million senior first
priority secured revolving credit facility, or revolving
facility. Our second priority facility consists of a
$225 million senior second priority secured term loan
facility. The proceeds of the term facility and a portion of the
revolving facility, together with substantially all of the
proceeds of the second priority facility, were used to refinance
our then existing debt in December 2003. We may use amounts
remaining available under the revolving facility for working
capital, certain permitted acquisitions and general corporate
purposes. See Description of Certain Indebtedness.
The term facility matures in June 2009, the
revolving facility matures in December 2008 and the second
priority facility matures in December 2009. Opcos
obligations under each of the credit facilities are guaranteed
by Holdings and each of its domestic subsidiaries. In addition,
subject to limited exceptions, the first priority facility is
secured by first priority security interests in all of
Opcos assets and the assets of Holdings and its domestic
subsidiaries and 65% of the assets of its foreign subsidiary.
The second priority facility is secured by second priority
security interests in the assets securing the first priority
facility. The priority of the security interests and related
creditor rights
44
Loans made under the credit facilities bear
interest at a floating rate and may be maintained as index rate
loans or as LIBOR rate loans. Index rate loans bear interest at
the index rate plus the applicable index rate margin, as
described in the first priority facility. Index rate is defined
as the higher of (1) the rate of interest publicly quoted
from time to time by The Wall Street Journal as the base rate on
corporate loans posted by at least 75% of the nations 30
largest banks, and (2) the Federal Reserve reported
overnight funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%. LIBOR rate loans bear
interest at the LIBOR rate, as described in the first priority
facility, plus the applicable LIBOR rate margin.
The applicable margin with respect to the term
facility is 2.00% in the case of index rate loans and 3.00% in
the case of LIBOR rate loans. The applicable margin for the
revolving facility is determined by a grid based on the ratio of
our consolidated indebtedness to our consolidated adjusted
EBITDA (as defined in our credit facilities) for the most
recently ended four fiscal quarters and range between 2.00% and
2.75% for LIBOR rate loans and range between 1.00% and 1.75% for
index rate loans.
The applicable margin with respect to loans made
under the second priority facility is 5.875% in the case of
index rate loans and 6.875% in the case of LIBOR rate loans;
provided, that, if the ratio of our consolidated indebtedness
over our consolidated adjusted EBITDA (as defined in our credit
facilities) is greater than 4.8:1.0 for any four fiscal
quarters, each of the applicable margins set forth above will be
increased by 100 basis points. In addition to the
foregoing, loans made under the second priority facility are
issued at a discount of 1.0% to the face amount.
The following tables sets forth the outstanding
balance, borrowing capacity and applicable interest rate under
our senior secured credit facilities.
In addition, under the revolving facility, we are
required to pay a fee equal to 0.50% of the total unused
commitment amount. We may also draw upon this credit facility
through letters of credit which carry specific fees.
Redeemable Preferred
Units.
As of June 30, 2004,
we had $26.8 million of redeemable, non-voting preferred
membership units. Holders of the redeemable preferred units are
entitled to receive a yield of 13.25% of its liquidation value
per annum for the first three years starting in April 2000,
and increasing to 15% of the liquidation value per annum
thereafter. The discount inherent in the yield for the first
three years was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount
of the redeemable preferred units. This discount was amortized
as a dividend over the initial three years. Of the total yield
on the redeemable preferred units, 48% is mandatorily payable
quarterly in cash to the redeemable preferred unit holders. The
unpaid portion of the yield accumulates annually and is added to
the liquidation value of the redeemable preferred units. The
preferred units are redeemable without premium or penalty,
wholly or in part, at Holdings option at any time, for the
45
Seller Notes.
As of June 30, 2004, we had $6.0 million of seller
notes outstanding, with interest rates ranging between 7.0% and
8.0% and maturities between 2004 and 2007. These notes were
issued in connection with prior acquisitions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2003 and 2002, we did not
have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations and Other
Commitments
Our future contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2004 by fiscal year are as follows:
Operating
Leases.
We have entered into
various noncancelable operating leases primarily related to
facilities, equipment and vehicles used in the ordinary course
of our business.
Contingent Transaction Consideration.
We have entered into earnout
agreements in connection with prior acquisitions. If the
acquired businesses generate operating profits in excess of
pre-determined targets, we are obligated to make additional cash
payments in accordance with the terms of such earnout
agreements. As of June 30, 2004, we estimate that we will
be required to make additional cash payments of up to $822,000
between 2004 to 2007. These additional cash payments are
accounted for as goodwill when earned.
We are involved in a dispute with a state tax
authority related to an unresolved sales tax issue which arose
from such state tax authoritys audit findings from their
sales tax audit of certain of our operating divisions for the
period from October 1998 to September 2001. The
unresolved issue relates to the application of sales taxes on
certain discounts we granted to our customers. Based on the
position taken by the state tax authority on this unresolved
issue, they have claimed that an additional $1.2 million of
sales taxes are due from us for the period in question, plus
approximately $0.4 million of interest. We strongly
disagree with the state tax authoritys position and have
filed a petition for redetermination requesting an appeals
conference to resolve this issue. A date for the appeals
conference originally scheduled in July 2004 has been
postponed at the request of the state tax authority to a later
date which has not yet been determined. The accrued expenses in
our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 and
June 30, 2004 each include approximately $0.2 million
of reserves related to this unresolved matter.
46
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
The following is a reconciliation of cash flows
provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA and unaudited
pro forma net income:
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to
Adjusted EBITDA:
For the reasons why we use EBIT, EBITDA, and
Adjusted EBITDA, see Key Financial
Measures EBIT, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA
above.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About
Market Risk
Our primary exposure to market risk is interest
rate risk associated with our debt instruments. We use both
fixed and variable rate debt as sources of financing. In
September 2003, we entered into an interest rate hedge
agreement with a notional amount of $111.2 million to
reduce our
47
In January 2004, we entered into two interest
rate collar agreements, referred to as the front-end and the
back-end interest rate collar agreements. The front-end interest
rate collar agreement has an initial notional amount of
$22.6 million which is increased quarterly to reflect
reductions in the notional amount of our interest rate swap
agreement, such that the notional amount of the swap agreement,
together with the notional amount of the front-end interest rate
collar agreement, remains not less than 40% of the aggregate
principal amount outstanding on our senior credit facilities.
The front-end interest rate collar agreement expires in
September 2005. The back-end interest rate collar agreement
becomes effective upon expiration of the swap agreement and
front-end interest rate collar agreement in September 2005 and
has a fixed notional amount of $111.0 million. The back-end
interest rate collar agreement expires in December 2006. At
June 30, 2004, the fair value of these interest rate collar
agreements was immaterial.
At December 31, 2003, we had
$385.1 million of total debt outstanding of which
$340.0 million was bearing interest at variable rates
approximating 8.5%. A 1.0% change in interest rates on variable
rate debt would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating by
approximately $2.3 million during the year ended
December 31, 2003.
We have not, and do not plan to, enter into any
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes. As of December 31, 2003, we had no other
significant material exposure to market risk, including foreign
exchange risk and commodity risks.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2002, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements
No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13,
and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 updates,
clarifies, and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements.
This statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, which required all
gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated
and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of
related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria in
Accounting Principles Board No. 30 will now be used to
classify those gains and losses. SFAS No. 64 amended
SFAS No. 4 and is no longer necessary as
SFAS No. 4 has been rescinded. SFAS No. 44
has been rescinded as it is no longer necessary.
SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13 to require
that certain lease modifications that have economic effects
similar to sale-leaseback transactions be accounted for in the
same manner as sale-lease transactions. This statement also
makes technical corrections to existing pronouncements. While
those corrections are not substantive in nature, in some
instances, they may change accounting practice. Our adoption of
SFAS No. 145 did not have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2002, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146
nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity,
under which a liability for an exit cost was recognized as of
the date of an entitys commitment to an exit plan.
SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost
associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at
fair value when the liability is incurred. Our adoption of this
standard effective January 1, 2003 had no impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This
interpretation elaborates on disclosures required in financial
48
In December 2002, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an
amendment of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 148
provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary
change to the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation. In addition,
SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 123 to require more prominent and more
frequent disclosures in financial statements about the effects
of stock-based compensation. This statement is effective for
financial statements for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2002. Our adoption of SFAS No. 148
did not have any impact on our financial statements as
management does not have any intention to change to the fair
value method.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, which addresses the
consolidation of business enterprises (variable interest
entities) to which the usual condition (ownership of a majority
voting interest) of consolidation does not apply. The
interpretation focuses on financial interests that indicate
control. It concludes that in the absence of clear control
through voting interests, a companys exposure (variable
interest) to the economic risks and potential rewards from the
variable interest entitys assets and activities are the
best evidence of control. Variable interests are rights and
obligations that convey economic gains or losses from changes in
the values of the variable interest entitys assets and
liabilities. Variable interests may arise from financial
instruments, service contracts, nonvoting ownership interests
and other arrangements. If an enterprise holds a majority of the
variable interests of an entity, it would be considered the
primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary would be required
to include the assets, liabilities and the results of operations
of the variable interest entity in its financial statements. In
December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 to
address certain implementation issues. The adoption of
FIN 46 and FIN 46 (revised) had no material
impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
In April 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies the financial
accounting and reporting of derivative instruments, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging
activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This
Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified
after June 30, 2003, except for certain hedging
relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption
of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments
with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
(SFAS 150). SFAS 150 requires issuers to classify as
liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) three classes of
freestanding financial instruments that embody obligations for
the issuer. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and is
otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period
beginning after June 15, 2003. We adopted SFAS 150 on
July 1, 2003, which resulted in classifying mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock as a liability in the balance sheet
and related accretion being charged to interest expense in the
statement of operations. See Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements for more detail.
49
Six Months
Year Ended December 31,
Ended
June 30,
2001
2002
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
53,151
$
56,413
$
48,237
$
28,515
$
(27,822
)
$
(40,355
)
$
(3,116
)
$
(1,880
)
(8,659
)
(5,209
)
(4,992
)
(3,427
)
(584
)
(354
)
(228
)
53
$
(37,065
)
$
(45,918
)
$
(8,336
)
$
(5,254
)
$
5,220
$
32,000
$
337,750
$
1,000
(20,350
)
(35,507
)
(375,613
)
(21,367
)
(950
)
(8,159
)
(355
)
111
(3,411
)
(10,153
)
(1,670
)
(3,045
)
$
(18,541
)
$
(14,610
)
$
(47,581
)
$
(23,767
)
December 31,
June 30,
2001
2002
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
29,110
$
24,995
$
17,315
$
16,809
$
24,338
$
24,371
$
16,809
$
32,870
$
30,116
$
23,903
$
25,791
$
26,773
364,738
378,608
359,340
344,130
$
394,854
$
402,511
$
385,131
$
370,903
As of December 31, 2003
As of June 30, 2004
Available
Available
Borrowing
Interest
Borrowing
Interest
Balance
Capacity
Rate
Balance
Capacity
Rate
(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
100,000
$
5.75%
$
99,750
$
4.18%
15,000
15,000
5.75%
30,000
225,000
9.8%
225,000
8.63%
$
340,000
$
15,000
$
324,750
$
30,000
Six Months
Ending
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
December 31,
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Thereafter
(Dollars in thousands)
$
2,335
$
3,722
$
1,696
$
635
$
47,875
$
298,949
3,503
5,646
3,379
1,813
818
532
15,037
23,800
13,982
9,279
6,329
18,794
$
20,875
$
33,168
$
19,057
$
11,727
$
55,022
$
318,275
Fiscal Year Ended
Six Months Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
53,151
$
56,413
$
48,237
$
26,922
$
28,515
(533
)
(5,482
)
(4,860
)
1,503
1,247
(41,828
)
(28,988
)
(38,436
)
(13,719
)
(10,592
)
5,802
6,304
4,321
3,641
5,174
47,530
39,917
39,390
18,116
16,248
64,122
68,164
48,652
36,463
40,592
25,372
17,898
18,359
9,415
8,623
89,494
86,062
67,011
45,878
49,215
(47,530
)
(39,917
)
(39,390
)
(18,116
)
(16,248
)
(8,424
)
(12,579
)
(5,728
)
(7,946
)
(11,111
)
(25,372
)
(17,898
)
(18,359
)
(9,415
)
(8,456
)
(3,107
)
(3,291
)
(1,730
)
(1,730
)
$
5,061
$
12,377
$
1,804
$
8,671
$
13,233
Fiscal Year Ended
Six Months Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
67,011
$
45,878
$
49,215
14,921
$
89,494
$
86,062
$
81,932
$
45,878
$
49,215
BUSINESS
Our Company
We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. We also provide these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality, that also require sophisticated document management services. The business-to-business services we provide to our customers include document management, document distribution and logistics , and print-on-demand . We provide our core services through industry leading technology and innovation, a sophisticated network of 173 locally branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs at our customers locations. We also sell reprographics equipment and supplies to complement our full range of service offerings. In further support of our core services, we license our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship internet-based application, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. We also operate PEiR (Profit and Education in Reprographics) through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers, while promoting our reprographics technology as the industry standard. Our services are critical to our customers because they shorten their document processing and distribution time, improve the quality of their document information management, and provide a secure, controlled document management environment.
We operate 173 reprographics service centers, including 170 service centers in 133 cities in 29 states throughout the United States and three reprographics service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. Our reprographics service centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. These service centers are arranged in a hub and satellite structure and are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide our services both locally and nationally. We service more than 65,000 active customers and employ over 3,450 people, including a sales force of approximately 270 employees.
In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We believe that our extensive national footprint, our industry leading technology, and our comprehensive offering of value-added services, including logistics and facilities management, provide us with a distinct competitive advantage.
While we began our operations in California and currently derive approximately half of our net sales from our operations in the state, we have continued to expand our geographic coverage and market share by entering complementary markets through strategic acquisitions of high quality companies with well recognized local brand names and, in most cases, more than 25 years of operating history. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 companies and have retained approximately 93% of the management of the acquired companies. As part of our growth strategy, we have recently begun opening and operating branch service centers, which we view as a low cost, rapid form of market expansion. Our branch openings require modest capital expenditures and are expected to generate operating profit within 12 months from opening. We have opened 15 new branches in key markets since September 2003 and expect to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005.
Corporate Background and Reorganization
Our predecessor, Ford Graphics, was founded in Los Angeles, California in 1960. In 1967, this sole proprietorship was dissolved and a new corporate structure was established under the name Micro Device, Inc., which continued to provide reprographics services under the name Ford
50
We are currently organized as American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Holdings. We conduct our operations through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American Reprographics Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, or Opco, and its subsidiaries.
Immediately prior to the closing of this offering, we will reorganize from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics Company. In the reorganization, the members of Holdings will exchange their common units and options to purchase common units for shares of our common stock and options to purchase shares of our common stock. As required by the operating agreement of Holdings, we will repurchase all of the preferred equity of Holdings upon the closing of this offering with a portion of the net proceeds from this offering. After our reorganization, all outstanding warrants to purchase common units will be exercisable for shares of our common stock.
Current Ownership
CHS is a private equity firm based in Chicago, Illinois specializing in leveraged buyouts and recapitalizations of middle market companies in partnership with company management through its private equity funds, including CHS IV. Since its founding in 1988, CHS has formed four private equity funds totaling $1.6 billion and currently has investments in 19 operating companies with combined annual revenues of more than $4.0 billion. CHS presently manages $1.5 billion of equity capital from leading financial institutions, pension funds, insurance companies, and university endowments. Its principal offices are located at 10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3175, Chicago, Illinois 60606. As of September 30, 2004, CHS IV and its affiliates owned approximately 49% of our outstanding common equity.
Our founders, Mr. Chandramohan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Suriyakumar, President and Chief Operating Officer, purchased ARC in 1989 under its predecessor name, Micro Device, Inc., are still actively involved in the business, and have provided continuity of leadership and control since then. As of September 30, 2004, our executive officers had a pecuniary interest in approximately 33% of our outstanding common equity. See Principal and Selling Stockholders.
Major Acquisitions
In addition to our primary focus on the growth of our business, we have pursued tactical acquisitions to expand and complement our existing service offerings and to expand our geographic locations where we believe we could be a market leader. For example, our acquisition of Ridgways, Inc. in September 2000 enabled us to expand our geographic reach and market penetration in 14 major metropolitan markets. In March 2002, we acquired certain assets of the Consolidated Reprographics division of Lason Systems, Inc., which allowed us to increase our market penetration in Southern California. In May 1999, we purchased certain technology and related know-how for software, which helped us expand our technology center and add personnel necessary to assist in developing PlanWell. In March 2000, we acquired certain assets of Sierra Network Systems, Inc., including technologies that contributed to our continued development of PlanWell.
We intend to continue to pursue a disciplined course of growing our business through complementary acquisitions. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions and may engage in acquisition negotiations at any time and from time to time. Currently, we are not party to any agreements or engaged in any negotiations regarding a material acquisition.
51
Industry Overview
The reprographics industry has traditionally provided services related to the reproduction and distribution of large format architectural, engineering and construction documents. Customer demands for speed and efficiency and advances in technology have transformed the reprographics industry such that reprographers are now expected to offer complex digital document management capabilities, document distribution expertise, comprehensive logistics, and the ability to provide document services under intense deadlines. These sophisticated services typically are charged as part of a per square foot printing cost.
According to the International Reprographics Association, or IRgA, the reprographics industry in the United States is estimated to be $5 billion in size. The IRgA indicates that the reprographics industry is highly fragmented, consisting of approximately 3,000 firms with average annual sales of approximately $1.5 million and 20 to 25 employees. Since construction documents are the primary medium of communication for the AEC industry, demand for reprographics services in the AEC market is closely tied to the level of activity in the construction industry, which in turn is driven by macroeconomic trends such as GDP growth, interest rates, job creation, office vacancy rates, and tax revenues. According to FMI Corporation, or FMI, a consulting firm to the construction industry, construction industry spending in the United States for 2004 is estimated at $975 billion, with expenditures divided between residential construction (55%) and commercial and public, or non-residential, construction (45%). Our AEC revenues are most closely correlated to the non-residential sectors of the construction industry because these sectors are the largest users of reprographics services. According to FMI, the non-residential sectors of the construction industry are projected to grow at an average of 5.4% per year over the next three years.
For over 100 years, AEC customers have used reprographics services to print, distribute, and store architectural, engineering and construction diagrams and plans. Prior to the 1980s, the blueprint was the primary medium of communication among the highly fragmented team of AEC professionals who was responsible for the creation and development of a construction project. With the advent of Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) software and the corresponding need for improved graphic reproduction and color graphics to support the digital nature of construction documents, reprographers have evolved their products and services to facilitate better communication through digital means. The production of documents through digital means significantly decreases errors in drawing interpretation due to the increased quality of information and the clarity with which these documents can be produced. The introduction of the internet spurred additional service and technology development, especially in the area of document management, document distribution and logistic services and print-on-demand.
Non-residential construction projects are generally large in scale, time consuming, and subject to cost overruns and delays. A frequent cause of such problems is the complexity of the construction documentation and the logistics involved in distributing documents to their intended recipients. Reprographers can facilitate better document management through technology applications. For example, reprographers can provide more efficient document distribution by shifting from an analog print and distribute business model, where customer orders are placed and produced in one location and physically distributed locally or nationally, to a digital distribute and print model, where customer orders are placed in one location, distributed digitally and physically produced at one or more local service centers.
Market opportunities for business-to-business document management services such as ours are rapidly expanding into non-AEC industries. For example, non-AEC customers are increasingly using large and small format color imaging for point-of-purchase displays, digital publishing, presentation materials, educational materials and marketing materials as these services have become more efficient and available on a short run, on-demand basis through digital technology. As a result, we believe that our addressable market is substantially larger than the core AEC reprographics market. We believe that the growth of non-AEC industries is generally tied to growth in
52
The development of digital technology and internet-based solutions for managing documents and the corresponding distribution and reproduction processes have also created an additional opportunity for reprographics companies such as ourselves to offer complementary, value-added services to AEC and non-AEC customers through intelligent technological solutions and an extensive physical network.
We believe the following general trends will continue to impact our business:
| Economic Recovery. The recovery in the overall economy is expected to boost construction activity. We estimate that recovery in non-residential construction typically lags the recovery in the broader economy by approximately six months, and we believe that we are at the early stages of an upturn in the non-residential construction cycle. FMI forecasts increases in non-residential construction spending at an average of 5.4% per year over the next three years. The economy is continuing to show signs of recovery as indicated by positive GDP growth, employment growth, increased consumer confidence and supportive monetary policy. Wall Streets consensus estimates forecast real GDP growth of 4.3% in 2004 and 3.6% in 2005. |
We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on these recovery trends through our economies of scale and through our nationwide network of service centers. |
| Digitization. The AEC industry is increasingly becoming digital, creating substantial efficiencies and cost savings for participants of the AEC industry through electronic design and collaboration. Improved document management by the AEC industry is compelling to participants due to frequent cost overruns and completion delays attributable to poor and inaccurate use of plans, specifications and other construction documentation, as well as the complex nature of construction projects. AEC and non-AEC customers alike are increasingly demanding higher value-added, comprehensive digital reprographics services. To meet the demands of the customers, the reprographics industry has been converting its main production technology from analog to digital. Digital technology is cost effective, allows for just-in-time printing and results in high quality documents that can be stored electronically, modified easily and printed in any quantity at any time. The internet is becoming the new distribution channel for the AEC industry, allowing reprographics businesses to shift from a print and distribute business model to a distribute and print model. |
We believe we are at the forefront of this industry trend and conduct our operations entirely by digital means through our 173 digitally connected service centers, each with similar production equipment and quality standards, and by enabling the digital fulfillment of our reprographics services through the development of our proprietary software, including PlanWell. |
| Expanding Geographic Presence. AEC firms of all sizes are expanding their operations into larger geographic territories. This trend requires reprographers to expand their service levels and offerings to keep up with customer demand. As a result, the ability to fulfill reprographics services across wider areas increases the logistical burden for the vast majority of reprographers, which are typically small, privately-held companies that serve only local markets. In addition, the desire for customers to possess a degree of centralized administrative control over their documents requires the support of a corresponding digital infrastructure. As AEC firms continue to decentralize and shift to the distribute and print model, we believe that reprographics firms with a comprehensive digital network and footprint of service facilities such as ours will be best positioned to serve their customers. |
The digitization of the AEC industry has also enabled AEC firms to expand globally to take advantage of opportunities in the global construction industry, which according to FMI is $3.3 trillion in size, and diversify the risks associated with operating in one region or one country. International reprographics markets appear to mirror the fragmentation and the small business |
53
orientation of the U.S. market, with few large reprographics companies. In addition, our recent efforts to introduce our technology solutions into Europe and Asia indicate that there is a significant lag in the adoption and availability of digital reprographics technology in those markets. | |
We believe that the addressable reprographics market of the global construction industry is significantly larger than the U.S. reprographics market and that we are well positioned to service the needs of global AEC firms. Our abilities to leverage our technology, offer value-added business service offerings, expand our physical operations, and successfully integrate new businesses offer us significant opportunities for growth outside the United States. |
| Secular Trends Favoring Outsourcing. Both AEC and non-AEC businesses are focused on increasing productivity by specializing in their core competencies and outsourcing non-core operations such as reprographics. The rapid pace of technological advances and the high costs of purchasing and operating equipment for in-house reprographics departments have further contributed to this trend. According to IDC, a global market intelligence and advisory firm, on-site outsourcing revenue will increase from $4.8 billion in 2003 to $6.6 billion in 2008, resulting in a projected CAGR of 6%. IDC also indicates that revenue from facilities management services and mailroom management services, from which the bulk of on-site revenue is derived, is expected to increase from $4.3 billion in 2003 to $5.9 billion in 2008, representing a projected CAGR of 6%. |
With a current base of more than 1,560 on-site facilities management programs, we believe we can leverage our depth of experience in selling and managing these programs into a growth opportunity that will meet or exceed the potential growth rate of the market itself. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that we maintain the following competitive strengths:
| Leading Market Position in Fragmented Industry. In terms of revenue, number of service facilities and number of customers, we believe we are the largest company in our industry, operating in more than eight times as many cities and with more than five times the number of service facilities as our next largest competitor. We are the largest reprographer in most of the geographic markets we serve, as the majority of the approximately 3,000 firms in the reprographics industry are small and locally focused. Our size and national footprint provide us with significant purchasing power, economies of scale, the ability to invest in industry leading technologies, and the resources to service large, national customers. Our well-recognized local brand names and our reputation for quality and reliability within the reprographics and AEC industries, supported by our ability to provide a wide range of services, have allowed us to gain and sustain the leading position in our industry. |
| Leader in Technology and Innovation. We strive to maintain the leading position in our industry by creating innovative, value-added technology solutions for our customers and other independent reprographers. We develop and support our industry leading suite of reprographics technology products through a team of approximately 20 full-time engineers and technical specialists at our two technology centers in Silicon Valley, as well as through continued investment in research and development. We also draw upon the combined experience, expertise and market insight of the management of our acquired reprographics firms to design, evaluate and improve our reprographics technology products. We believe PlanWell is best positioned to become the industry standard within the AEC industry. From PlanWells inception in June 2000 through September 1, 2004, more than 650,000 orders have been placed through PlanWell online planrooms for the management of more than 54,000 projects and seven million complex, large format documents. In addition, we have developed other proprietary software applications that complement PlanWell and have enabled us to improve the efficiency of our services, add complementary services and increase our opportunities for capturing revenue. These include Abacus PCR, our proprietary job tracking software, BidCaster, our proprietary Invitation to Bid tool (ITB), EWO, our proprietary electronic work order application, MetaPrint, our print automation |
54
and device manager, and OneView, our proprietary centralized project and administrative module for larger customers. | |
| Extensive National Footprint with Regional Expertise. Our service centers maintain local customer relationships while benefiting from our centralized corporate functions and national scale. Each service center provides sophisticated, personalized services that are tailored to meet the regional needs of our customers. Our service facilities are organized as hub and satellite structures within individual markets, allowing us to balance production capacity and minimize capital expenditures through technology sharing among our service centers within each market. Our service centers are in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. This enables us to maintain our national distribute and print operations and allows our service facilities to act as backup and supply centers for the more than 1,560 facilities management programs we have in place at customer sites throughout the United States. We also leverage the geographic coverage of our production facilities to address the service needs of large companies that operate in multiple locations. Our Premier Accounts sales initiative offers regional and national customers our localized services under a single contract, while offering centralized access to project specific services, billing, and tracking information. |
| Flexible Operating Model. We are able to tailor our operations to meet the demands of the local markets that we serve by promoting regional decision making for marketing, pricing, and selling practices. In this manner, we remain responsive to our customers while benefiting from the cost structure advantages of our centralized administrative functions. Our flexible operating model also allows us to capitalize on an improving business environment. Capital investment for a new branch is modest and these new branches are expected to generate positive operating profit within 12 months from opening. The economies associated with opening a new branch give us flexibility and market response times that can significantly enhance our regional growth. We use our wide area network and management information systems to benchmark daily financial and operational data to help us identify and respond to changes in operating trends and disseminate best practices across all branches. We estimate that approximately 60% of our cost base is fixed and that the operating margin on our incremental revenue is more than two times our current operating margin. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2003, we achieved an operating margin of 15.0% and an EBITDA margin (exclusive of a one-time charge related to the early extinguishment of debt) of 19.7%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we experienced revenue growth of 5.6% compared to the same period in 2003, and achieved an operating margin of 17.7% and an EBITDA margin of 21.8%, resulting in margin improvement of approximately 2.7 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, demonstrating the leverage in our operating model in an expanding business environment. |
| Consistent, Strong Free Cash Flow. Through management of our inventory and receivables and our low capital expenditure requirements, we have consistently generated strong free cash flow (defined as operating cash flow less cash capital expenditures), regardless of recent industry and economic conditions. Our historical cash capital expenditures have been relatively low, with overall capital spending averaging approximately 1.5% of annual net sales over the last three years. In 2003, we generated free cash flow of $43.2 million. From the beginning of 2001 to the end of June 2004, we generated a cumulative $164.0 million of free cash flow. |
| Low Cost Operator. We believe we are one of the lowest cost operators in the reprographics industry, which we have accomplished by minimizing branch level expenses and capitalizing on our significant scale for purchasing efficiencies. As a result of our national presence and size, we enjoy significant economies of scale, and we receive favorable terms from major vendors of equipment, software and reprographics supplies, such as Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company, CDW Corporation, and Dell Inc. We also offer savings to other reprographers through our PEiR division, which allows members to purchase |
55
machinery and supplies at lower prices than they could obtain independently while further increasing our purchasing power. | |
| Experienced Management Team and Highly Trained Workforce. Our senior management team of S. Mohan Chandramohan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, K. Suri Suriyakumar, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Mark Legg, Chief Financial Officer, together with our divisional managers, has an average of over 20 years of industry experience. Mr. Chandramohan has been with us since February 1988 and Mr. Suriyakumar has been with us since November 1989. We have also successfully retained approximately 93% of the managers of the 80 businesses we have acquired since 1997. As a result of these acquisitions, we have developed a formalized training program that collects and disseminates best practices to our employees through formal instruction and seminars. The program covers all of our business practices, including general management, operations, sales and marketing, technology, human resources and accounting. |
Our Business Strategy
Our objective is to continue to strengthen our competitive position as the preferred provider of business-to-business document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We seek to strengthen this position while increasing revenue, cash flow, profitability, and market share. We believe our leadership position through our nationwide footprint, our continuous technological innovation, our promotion of PlanWell as the industry standard, and our value-added service offerings will allow us to continue to meet our objectives. Our key strategies to accomplish these objectives include:
| Continue to Increase Our Market Penetration and Expand Our Nationwide Footprint. Through our technical and operational expertise and strong customer relationships, we expect to continue to penetrate key markets and build our nationwide presence. We believe that customers rely on local relationships for their document management services, and we intend to increase our existing presence in key U.S. markets while expanding into under-penetrated regions through facilities management contracts, targeted branch openings, strategic acquisitions, and national accounts. |
Õ | Facilities Management Contracts: We expect to capitalize on the continued trend of our customers to outsource their document management services, including their in-house operations. Our facilities management services are turnkey solutions to our customers that can transform what was a cost center for our customers into a profit center. Rather than absorbing the entire cost of such a facility, our customers receive an invoice from us based on their use which is typically reimbursable by project owners and developers. Since January 1, 2001, the number of our facilities management contracts has more than doubled. Based on the six months ended June 30, 2004, annualized net sales from these contracts have grown to $69.0 million. We will continue to concentrate on developing ongoing facilities management relationships in all of the markets we serve and building our base of recurring revenue. | |
Õ | Targeted Branch Openings: Significant opportunities exist to expand our geographic coverage, capture new customers and increase our market share by opening additional satellite branches in regions near our established operations. Our strategy with respect to branch openings is in the early stages of implementation, having evolved as the next stage of our growth to complement our traditional acquisition strategy. Since September 2003, we have opened 15 new branches in areas that expand or further penetrate our existing markets and plan to open an additional 14 branches by the end of the first quarter of 2005. Capital investment for a new branch is modest and these new branches are expected to generate positive operating profit within 12 months from opening. We plan to open branches within our existing markets to serve new customers, in new markets to serve both existing and new customers, and in markets that have no ideal acquisition candidates or where potential |
56
acquisitions are likely to be too costly. We believe that our existing corporate infrastructure is capable of supporting a much larger branch network and significantly higher revenue. | ||
Õ | Strategic Acquisitions: Acquisitions have historically been an important component of our growth strategy. Since 1997, we have acquired 80 reprographics companies and have developed a structured approach to acquiring and integrating companies. We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our business further through disciplined, strategic acquisitions due to the fragmented nature of our industry. Because our industry consists primarily of small, privately-held companies that serve only local markets, we believe that we can continue to grow our business by successfully acquiring additional reprographics companies at reasonable prices and subsequently realizing substantial operating and purchasing synergies by leveraging our existing corporate infrastructure. We will continue to leverage our acquisition and integration expertise to expand into new markets and increase our presence in existing underpenetrated markets. | |
Õ | National Accounts: Our Premier Accounts business unit offers a comprehensive suite of reprographics services designed to meet the demands of large regional and national businesses. It provides local reprographics services to national companies through our national network of reprographics service centers, while offering centralized access to project-specific services, billing and tracking information. For example, we recently entered into an exclusive Premier Accounts contract with one of the leading construction companies in the United States under which we offer a full range of document management, distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services on a national scale. This contract requires that the customer use PlanWell for every project, and the use of PlanWell by this customers contractors, subcontractors and outside work force should significantly improve the potential for revenue growth from this account. Through our extensive national footprint and industry leading technology, we believe that we are well-positioned to meet the demands of national companies and will continue to capture additional revenues and customers through this business unit. |
| Promote PlanWell as the Industry Standard for Procuring Reprographics Services Online. Our goal is to continue to expand market penetration of PlanWell and create a standardized, internet-based portal to manage, store, and retrieve documents. In order to increase market share and achieve industry standardization, we will continue to license our PlanWell technology to other reprographics companies, including members of PEiR. Through September 1, 2004, we have licensed PlanWell and our other technology products to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities across the United States. These efforts, combined with the strong functionality and growing capabilities of the PlanWell suite of products, should continue to position us at the forefront of technological innovation within the AEC and non-AEC reprographics markets, and create additional service and licensing revenue for us. |
| Expand Our Non-AEC and Ancillary Product and Service Offerings. We believe that offering our services to non-AEC customers and expanding our existing suite of product and service offerings are effective methods of increasing sales to both new and existing customers. We have leveraged our expertise in providing highly customized, quick-turn services to the AEC industry to attract customers from non-AEC industries that are increasingly seeking sophisticated document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand services. We have been successful in attracting non-AEC customers that require services such as the production of large format and small format color and black and white documents, educational and training materials, short-run publishing products, and retail and promotional items. We began targeting non-AEC customers upon our conversion to digital technology in 1997, and we believe that our services to these customers accounted for approximately 20% of our year to date net sales. |
In addition to expanding our non-AEC revenues, we continue to focus on creating new value-added services beyond traditional reprographics to offer all of our customers. We are actively engaged in
57
Our Services
We provide business-to-business services to our customers in three key areas: document management, document distribution and logistics , and print-on-demand . These services are provided to our AEC industry customers, as well as to our customers in non-AEC industries that have similar document management and production requirements. Our AEC customers work primarily with high volumes of large format construction plans and small format specification documents that are technical, complex, constantly changing and frequently confidential. Our non-AEC customers generally require services that apply to black and white and color small format documents, promotional documents of all sizes, and the digital distribution of document files to multiple locations for a variety of print-on-demand needs including short-run digital publishing.
We provide our business-to-business services through industry leading technology, a sophisticated network of 173 locally-branded reprographics service centers, and more than 1,560 facilities management programs. These services include:
| PlanWell, our proprietary, internet-based planroom launched in June 2000, and our suite of other reprographics software products that enable the online purchase and fulfillment of reprographics services. From Planwells inception in June 2000 through September 1, 2004, more than 650,000 orders have been placed through PlanWell online planrooms for the management of more than 54,000 projects and seven million complex, large format documents. While PlanWell typically facilitates the management of large and small format documents for professionals in the AEC industry, the application can be used to manage small format document collections and color documents for non-AEC users. PlanWell is provided in two primary configurations: PlanWell Enterprise , a hosted, comprehensive documentation system with a wide variety of administration and document management features; and PlanWell PDS, a simple, stand alone online planroom that acts as a document viewing and distribution tool for a single set of plans. |
| Production services, including print-on-demand, document assembly, document finishing, mounting, laminating, binding, and kitting. We utilize a broad range of digital output equipment and finishing and assembly skills to produce print-on-demand projects at each of our 173 service centers. These services include the production of large format and small format documents in both black and white and color. Documents can be digitally transferred from one service facility to another to balance production capacity or take advantage of a distribute and print operating system. |
| Document distribution and logistics, including the physical pick up, delivery, and shipping of time-sensitive, critical documents. These services are supported by a fleet of approximately 675 vehicles and nearly 700 employees. Our service facilities provide pedestrian, bicycle and car courier services in most metropolitan markets, and we also offer third party shipping services to all of our customers. Contracted courier services allow our divisions to manage additional delivery capacity through approximately 157 vehicles and drivers. |
| Highly customized large and small format reprographics in color and black and white. For our non-AEC customers this includes digital reproduction of posters, tradeshow displays, plans, banners, signage and maps. We offer large format color services through a variety of processes, including inkjet, bubblejet, large format electrostatic printing and photographic printing. We also offer small format color reprographics services, which typically use laser printing technology, for products such as flyers, real estate deal books and financial presentations. |
| Facilities management, including recurring on-site document management services and staffing at our customers locations. We currently have more than 1,560 facilities management programs, |
58
which typically include the management and procurement of related on-site equipment and supplies. Our facilities management services generally eliminate reprographics capital expenditures for our customers and keep equipment current and in good condition. Our facilities management services also help our customers track and capture reprographics costs that are often reimbursable, and frequently transform a customers cost center into profit center. | |
| Sales of reprographics equipment and supplies to other reprographics companies and end-users in the AEC industry to further complement our full range of service and product offerings and increase our purchasing power. In addition, a number of our service centers are authorized dealers for reprographics equipment manufactures such as Océ and Xerox. Sales of reprographics equipment and supplies accounted for over $40.7 million, or 9.8%, of our net sales in 2003. |
| The design and development of other document management and reprographics software, in addition to PlanWell, that supports ordering, tracking, job costing, and other customer specific accounting information for a variety of projects and services. Many of these applications create greater value and offer a wider range of services when used in conjunction with one another, providing an incentive to our customers to use our services beyond a single need. These proprietary applications include: |
Õ | Electronic Work Order (EWO), which offers our customers access to the services of all of our service centers through the internet. This application also offers the reprographer the ability to create internet-based order forms that conform to their available service offerings and pricing. Customers can use a simple upload application to send files to the reprographer or schedule a pickup for original documents. This application can also be configured to interface with other third party internet-based products, acting as the driving e-commerce engine for a reprographics organization. | |
Õ | Abacus Print Cost Recovery (PCR) System, which provides a suite of software modules for reprographers and their customers to track documents produced from equipment installed as a part of a facilities management program. | |
Õ | BidCaster Invitation-to-Bid (ITB) System, a data management internet application that issues customizable invitations to bid from a customers desktop using email and a hosted fax server. This application links potential bidders directly to a PlanWell online planroom to evaluate and order plans used in the submission of project bids, and tracks bid responses to provide the customer a much faster, convenient and efficient way to gather and complete project bids. | |
Õ | MetaPrint Print Automation and Device Manager, a universal print driver that facilitates the printing of documents with output devices manufactured by multiple vendors, and allows the reprographer to print multiple documents in various formats as a single print submission. | |
Õ | OneView Document Access and Customer Administration System, an internet-based application that leverages the security attributes of PlanWell to provide a single point of access to all of a customers project documents, regardless of which of our local production facilities stores the relevant documents. This application also imports and consolidates invoice data from each of our service centers in a variety of formats and reports. |
To further support and promote our core suite of services (document management, document distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand) , as well as lead our industry forward and establish ourselves firmly at the forefront of technology and innovation in the reprographics industry, we also:
| License our suite of reprographics technology products, including our flagship online planroom, PlanWell, to independent reprographers. Our licensing efforts promote our technology as the digital standard for the fulfillment of reprographics services in the AEC industry. Through September 1, 2004, we have licensed PlanWell and our other technology products to 64 reprographics companies operating 80 service facilities across the United States. |
59
| Operate PEiR (Profit and Education in Reprographics), a trade organization wholly owned by us, through which we charge membership fees and provide purchasing, technology and educational benefits to other reprographers. PEiR members, currently consisting of 43 independent reprographers, are required to license PlanWell and may purchase equipment and supplies at a lower cost than they could obtain independently. In turn, their purchasing volumes increase our buying power and influence with our vendors. We also distribute our educational programs to PEiR members to help establish and promote best practices within the reprographics industry. |
Customers and Representative Projects
Our customers are both local and national companies, with no single customer accounting for more than 2% of our net sales in 2003.
We have historically provided reprographics and
related business services primarily to the AEC market. However,
since 1997, we have focused on increasing the number of non-AEC
customers in our customer base to increase diversification and
expand our core services into markets that seek sophisticated
document management, document distribution and logistics, and
print-on-demand services. We generated approximately 80% of our
year to date net sales from AEC customers. We began targeting
non-AEC customers upon our conversion to digital technology in
1997 and we believe that services to these customers accounted
for approximately 20% of our year to date net sales.
Top 20 AEC Customers
The following is a list of our top 20 AEC
customers based upon year to date net sales through August 2004:
Top 20 Non-AEC Customers
The following is a list of our top
20 non-AEC customers based upon year to date net sales
through August 2004:
Anshen & Allen, Architects, Inc.
BSW Architects
EDAW, Inc.
Ewing Cole Cherry Brott
Gensler
Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.
Hillier International
The Irvine Company
KTGY Group, Inc.
MBH Architects, Inc.
Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc.
Perini Corporation
RBF Consulting
Rockwell Group
Skanska USA Building Inc.
Skidmore Owens & Merrill LLP
Standard Pacific Corporation
The Turner Corporation
URS Corporation
Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo
Adac Laboratories, Inc.
AIM Management Group Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.
Baker Hughes Incorporated
The Boeing Company
Chevron Phillips Chemical
DBL Realtors Corp.
Etec Systems
Helix U.S.A. Ltd.
Lam Research Corporation
Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works
NACE International
San Manuel Indian Bingo & Casino
Sound Transit
Southern California Edison
Staedtler, Inc.
Taco Bell Corp.
WDI/ Document Controls
Wells Fargo & Company
University of California, Los Angeles
60
Representative Projects
The following is a representative list of recent
small and large projects in which we supplied reprographics
services:
Name of Project
Architect
Builder
Corgan Associates, Inc.
The Turner Corporation
North Terminal Development
(Miami, FL)
Frank O. Gehry & Associates, Inc.
M. A. Mortenson Company
(Los Angeles, CA)
Polshek Partnership Architects LLP
Skanska USA Building Inc.
Biomedical Science Research Building
(Ann Arbor, MI)
LPA, Inc.
The Turner Corporation
Campus Office Development
(Torrance, CA)
Marnell Carrao Associates
Marnell Carrao Associates
Sams Town Gambling Hall
(Las Vegas, NV)
(Irvine, CA)
Zimmer, Gunsul, Frasca Partnership + HDR
Hensel Phelps
Fluor Corporation
Fluor Corporation
Headquarters (Irvine, CA)
Multiple
Multiple
Masterplan (Aliso Viejo, CA)
HOK Sport + Venue + Event
Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR)
PCL Civil Constructors Inc.
Multiple
Tunnel (Virginia Beach, VA)
Morphosis Architects
Clark Construction Group, LLC
Headquarters
(Los Angeles, CA)
Gensler
Gilbane Building Company
International Airport (San Jose, CA)
SSOE, Inc.
W.G. Yates & Sons
Facility (Canton, MS)
Construction Co.,
Yates/ Walbridge
61
Operations
Geographic Presence. We operate 173 reprographics service centers, including 170 service centers in 133 cities in 29 states throughout the United States and three service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. Our reprographics service centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. The map below illustrates the number of our service centers by state.
Hub and Satellite Configuration. We are organized into 42 divisions that typically consist of a cluster configuration of at least one large service facility, or hub facility, and several smaller facilities, or satellite facilities, that are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide all of our services both locally and nationwide. Our hub and satellite configuration enables us to shorten our customers document processing and distribution time, as well as achieve higher utilization of output devices by coordinating the distribution of work orders digitally among our service centers. In addition, this organizational structure allows us to balance production capacity, improve equipment utilization, and minimize capital expenditures through technology sharing among our service centers within each market. The hub and satellite model supports our ability to respond to the demands of local markets by promoting regional decision making for marketing, pricing, and selling practices while benefiting from centralized administrative functions.
62
Overview of Typical Hub and Satellite
Capabilities
Central Hub Facilities
Satellite Facilities
Process simple reprographics
Quick turnaround capabilities
Sophisticated equipment
Responsive, localized service
Local delivery service
Light production capacity
Finishing services
| Central Hub Facilities. In each of our major markets, we operate one or more large scale full service facilities that have high production capacity and sophisticated equipment. These larger facilities offer specialized services such as laser digital imaging on photographic material, large format color printing, and finishing services that may not be economically viable for smaller facilities to provide. Each central hub facility also maintains a library of design and imaging software, including architectural software, to process customer orders in digital format. In addition, digital equipment at all of our service facilities is networked, allowing a single order to be processed simultaneously on multiple pieces of equipment. These facilities also offer customers access to PlanWell, as well as document storage and retrieval services. Our central hub facilities also coordinate our facilities management programs. |
| Satellite Facilities. To supplement the capabilities of our central hub facilities, we operate satellite facilities that are typically located closer to our customers than the central hubs. Our satellite facilities have quick turnaround capabilities, responsive, localized service, and handle the majority of digital processes. By utilizing a fleet of approximately 675 vehicles and nearly 700 employees, together with approximately 157 vehicles and drivers from contracted courier services for additional flexible capacity, these satellite facilities interact directly with customers and our central hub facilities to provide customers with a full range of high quality, on-demand reprographics services. In addition, our delivery fleet enables the smaller satellite facilities to coordinate with each other to reduce turnaround time for customers by evenly distributing work orders. The smaller satellite centers also typically provide digital black and white printing and imaging, color printing and limited finishing services. |
Management Systems and Controls. We operate our business under a dual operating structure of centralized administrative functions and regional decision making. Acquired companies typically retain their local business identities, managers, sales force, and marketing efforts in order to maintain strong local relationships. Our local management maintains autonomy over the day-to-day operations of their business units, including profitability, customer billing, receivables collection, and service mix decisions. We believe that this decentralized and entrepreneurial approach to our operations is essential in capitalizing on our managers knowledge of local markets and long established customer relationships.
Although we operate on a decentralized basis, our senior management closely monitors and reviews each of our 42 divisions through daily reports that contain operating and financial information such as sales, inventory levels, purchasing commitments, collections, and receivables. In addition, our operating divisions submit monthly reports to senior management that track each divisions financial and operating performance in comparison to monthly budgets.
Suppliers and Vendors
We purchase raw materials, consisting primarily of paper, toner, and other consumables, and purchase or lease reprographics equipment. To minimize our materials cost, we maintain a paper
63
Our primary vendors of equipment, maintenance services and reprographics supplies include Océ N.V., Xerox Corporation, Canon Inc., and Xpedx, a division of International Paper Company. We have long standing relationships with all of our suppliers and we believe we receive favorable prices as compared to our competition due to the large quantities we purchase and strong relationships with our vendors. We have entered into annual supply contracts with certain vendors to guarantee prices. Significant market fluctuations in our raw material costs have historically been limited to paper prices and we have typically maintained strong gross margins as the result of our ability to pass increased material costs through to our customers.
Sales and Marketing
Divisional Sales Force. We market our products and services throughout the United States through localized sales forces and marketing efforts at the divisional level. We had approximately 270 sales and customer service representatives as of September 1, 2004. Each sales force generally consists of a sales manager and a staff of between two to 12 sales and customer service representatives that target various customer segments. Depending on the size of the operating division, a sales team may serve both the central hub service facility and satellite facilities, or if market demographics require, operate on behalf of a single service facility.
Our sales associates have been trained in our entire portfolio of services. They are in close contact with the local business community and offer our portfolio of services to customers in a variety of local industries in both the AEC and non-AEC markets.
In most locations, we follow a customized sales approach to the market that is dependent on the distinctive trade practices of the region. For example, in some major metropolitan markets, architects exert controlling influence over the management of construction projects, whereas in other markets, general contractors have greater control. We believe our strong connections to AEC and general business communities and our long operating history provide us with the insight and understanding to effectively address regionally focused trade practices through our targeted sales efforts.
Premier Accounts. To further enhance our strong market share and service portfolio on a national level, we operate a Premier Accounts business unit. Designed to meet the requirements of large regional or national businesses, we established this operating division to take advantage of growing globalization within the AEC market, and to establish ourselves at the corporate level as the leading national reprographer with extensive geographic and service capabilities. The Premier Accounts sales initiative allows us to attract large AEC and non-AEC companies with document management, distribution and logistics, and print-on-demand needs that span wide geographical or organizational boundaries. Since its launch in the middle of 2003, we have established six national accounts through Premier Accounts, including our most recent exclusive contract with one of the leading construction companies in the United States.
PEiR Group. We established the PEiR Group (Profit and Education in Reprographics) in July 2003, a separate operating division of our company that is a membership-based organization for the reprographics industry. Comprised of independent reprographers and reprographics vendors, its mission is to create a large, unified group of successful independent reprographers able to advance
64
Competition
According to the IRgA, most firms in the U.S. reprographics services industry are small, privately held entrepreneurial businesses. The larger reprographers in the United States include Service Point USA, a subsidiary of Service Point Solutions, S.A., Thomas Reprographics, Inc., ABC Imaging, LLC, and National Reprographics Inc. While we have no nationwide competitors, we do compete at the local level with a number of privately held reprographics companies, commercial printers, digital imaging firms, and to a limited degree, retail copy shops. Competition is primarily based on customer service, technological leadership, product performance and price. We believe that the scale and scope of our operations are distinct competitive advantages that differentiate us from our competitors. See Risk Factors Competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors may hinder our ability to execute our business strategy and maintain our profitability.
Research and Development
We believe that to compete effectively we must continue to invest in research and development of our services. Our research and development efforts are focused on improving and enhancing PlanWell as well as developing new proprietary services. As of September 1, 2004, we employed approximately 20 engineers and technical specialists with expertise in software, internet-based applications, database management, internet security and quality assurance. Cash outlays for research and development which include both capitalized and expensed items amounted to $2.5 million in 2001, $2.7 million in 2002, $2.8 million in 2003, and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Proprietary Rights
Our success depends on our proprietary information and technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, license agreements, nondisclosure and noncompete agreements, reseller agreements, customer contracts, and technical measures to establish and protect our rights in our proprietary technology. Our PlanWell license agreements grant our customers a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to use our products and receive our services and contain terms and conditions prohibiting the unauthorized reproduction or transfer of our services. We retain all title and rights of ownership in our software products. In addition, we enter into agreements with some of our employees, third-party consultants and contractors that prohibit the disclosure or use of our confidential information and require the assignment to us of any new ideas, developments, discoveries or inventions related to our business. We also require other third parties to enter into nondisclosure agreements that limit use of, access to, and distribution of our proprietary information. We also rely on a variety of technologies that are licensed from third parties to perform key functions.
We have registered PlanWell as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and have applied for registration in Canada, Australia and the European Union. Additionally, we have applied to register the trademark PlanWell PDS with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in Canada, Australia and the European Union. We do not have any other trademarks, service marks or patents that are material to our business.
65
For a discussion of the risks associated with our proprietary rights, see Risk Factors Our failure to adequately protect the proprietary aspects of our technology, including PlanWell, may cause us to lose market share and Risk Factors Our intellectual property rights may be subject to the rights of third parties.
Information Technology
We operate two technology centers in Silicon Valley to support our reprographics services. Our second technology center was recently opened to accommodate the continuing growth of our digital operations, and to provide redundancy for our critical equipment and communication infrastructure. Our technology centers also serve as design and development facilities for our software applications, and house our nationwide database administration team and networking engineers.
From these technology centers, our technical staff is able to remotely manage, control and troubleshoot the primary databases and connectivity of each of our 42 operating divisions. This allows us to avoid the costs and expenses of employing costly database administrators and network engineers in each of our service facilities.
All of our reprographics service centers are connected via a high performance, dedicated wide area network (WAN), with additional capacity and connectivity through a virtual private network (VPN) to handle customer data transmissions and e-commerce transactions. Our technology centers are standardized on HP/Compaq ProLiant TM Servers and Microsoft Window 2000 Enterprise Server software. Our technology centers use both commonly available software and custom applications running in a clustered computing environment and employ industry leading technologies for redundancy, backup and security.
We apply the extensive industry knowledge and experience of the managers of our acquired reprographics companies to our technology development in order to create solutions that are immediately practical to reprographers and their customers.
We employ advanced digital technology to improve processes, reduce costs, and increase our efficiency. We have built our technology infrastructure in a manner which provides us with engineering talent, development tools, and powerful computing resources while carefully managing our costs.
Employees
As of September 1, 2004, we had over 3,450 employees. Approximately 27 of our employees are covered by two collective agreements. The collective bargaining agreement with our subsidiary, Ridgways Ltd., expires on November 30, 2007 and the agreement with our subsidiary, B.P. Independent Reprographics, Inc., expires on December 4, 2006, but will continue thereafter from year to year unless either party terminates the agreement. We have not experienced a work stoppage during the past five years and believe that our relationships with our employees and collective bargaining units are good.
Facilities
We currently operate 180 production facilities, including five production support facilities and our two technology centers in Fremont, California, totaling approximately 1,343,057 square feet. We have five administrative facilities, totaling approximately 25,082 square feet. Our executive offices are located in Glendale, California.
66
The table below lists our facilities by region,
type of facility, number of facilities and square footage as of
September 1, 2004.
Number of
Number of
Administrative
Square
Production
Square
Region
Facilities
Footage
Facilities(1)
Footage(1)
1
7,183
37
307,605
1
4,659
34
264,146
0
0
9
96,640
3
13,240
33
193,560
0
0
42
284,281
0
0
25
(2)
196,825
5
25,082
180
1,343,057
(1) | Includes five production support facilities and our two technology centers in Fremont, California. |
(2) | Includes our three service centers in the Toronto metropolitan area. |
We lease 168 of our production facilities, each of our administrative facilities and both of our technology centers. These leases generally expire between 2005 and 2009. Substantially all of the leases contain renewal provisions with automatic rent escalation clauses. The owned facilities are subject to major encumbrances under our credit facilities. In addition to the facilities that are owned, our fixed assets are comprised primarily of machinery and equipment, trucks, and computer equipment.
Legal Proceedings
We are a creditor and participant in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy of Louis Frey Company, Inc., or LF Co., which is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. We managed LF Co. under a contract from May through September of 2003. LF Co. filed for Bankruptcy protection in August 2003, and the proceeding was converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation in October 2003. On or about June 30, 2004, the Bankruptcy Estate Trustee filed a complaint in the LF Co. Bankruptcy proceeding against us, which was amended on or about July 19, 2004, alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties, conversion, unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract, unfair competition and false commercial promotion in violation of The Lanham Act, misappropriation of trade secrets and fraud regarding our handling of the assets of LF Co. The Trustee claims damages of not less than $9.5 million, as well as punitive damages and treble damages with respect to the Lanham Act claims. Previously, on or about October 10, 2003, a secured creditor of LF Co., Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc., or Merrill, had filed a complaint in the LF Co. Bankruptcy proceeding against us, which was most recently amended on or about July 6, 2004. Merrills claims are duplicated in the Trustees suit. We, in turn, have filed answers and counterclaims denying liability to the Trustee and seeking reimbursement of all costs and damages sustained as a result of the Trustees actions and in our efforts to assist LF Co. Discovery has commenced and is ongoing in each of these cases. We believe that we have meritorious defenses as well as substantial counterclaims against Merrill Lynch and the Trustee. We intend to vigorously contest the above matters. Based on the discovery and depositions to date, we do not believe that the outcome of the above matters will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
We are involved in various legal proceedings and other legal matters from time to time in the normal course of business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
67
Environmental and Regulatory Considerations
Our property consists principally of reprographics and related production equipment and we lease substantially all of our production and administrative facilities. We are not aware of any environmental liabilities which would have a material impact on our operations and financial condition.
68
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and
position of the persons who will be our directors and executive
officers as of the date of the completion of the offering.
Name
Age
Position
45
Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board of
Directors
51
President; Chief Operating Officer; Director
49
Chief Financial Officer; Secretary
45
Chief Technology Officer
46
Director
40
Director
47
Director
Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of our board of directors. A brief biography of each person who will serve as a director or executive officer upon consummation of this offering follows below. Prior to our conversion from a California limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, each officer served Holdings in the capacities discussed below.
Sathiyamurthy (Mohan) Chandramohan has served as an advisor and the Chairman of the Board of Advisors of Holdings since March 1998 and has served as a director and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Chandramohan joined Micro Device, Inc. (our predecessor company) in February 1988 as President and became the Chief Executive Officer in March 1991. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Chandramohan was employed with U-Save Auto Parts Stores from December 1981 to February 1988, and became the companys Chief Financial Officer in May 1985 and Chief Operating Officer in March 1987. Mr. Chandramohan served as the President of the International Reprographics Association (IRgA) from August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2002 and continues to be an active member of the IRgA.
Kumarakulasingam (Suri) Suriyakumar has served as an advisor of Holdings since March 1998 and has served as a director of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Suriyakumar joined Micro Device, Inc. in 1989. He became the Vice President of Micro Device, Inc. in 1990 and became the companys President and Chief Operating Officer in 1991. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Suriyakumar was employed with Aitken Spence & Co. LTD, a highly diversified conglomerate and one of the five largest corporations in Sri Lanka. Mr. Suriyakumar is an active member of the IRgA.
Mark W. Legg joined Holdings as its Chief Financial Officer in April 1998. From 1987 to 1998, Mr. Legg was employed at Vivitar Corporation, a distributor of photographic, optical, electronic and digital imaging products, as a Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer, and later as its Chief Operating Officer. Before Vivitar, he was director of corporate accounting at Sunrise Medical from 1984 to 1986. From 1979 to 1984, Mr. Legg was employed as an accountant with Price Waterhouse & Co.
Rahul K. Roy joined Holdings as our Chief Technology Officer in September 2000. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Roy was the Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of MirrorPlus Technologies, Inc., which developed software for the reprographics industry, from August 1993 until it was acquired by us in 1999. Mr. Roy served as the Chief Operating Officer of InPrint, a provider of printing, software, duplication, packaging, assembly and distribution services to technology companies, from 1993 until it was acquired by us in 1999.
69
Andrew W. Code has served as an advisor of Holdings since May 2002 and has served as a director of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Code is a partner of CHS and founded its predecessors in 1988. Mr. Code is also a director of SCP Pool Corporation.
Thomas J. Formolo has served as an advisor of Holdings since April 2000 and has served as a director of American Reprographics Company since October 2004. Mr. Formolo has been a partner of CHS since 1997 and employed by its affiliates since 1990.
Manuel Perez de la Mesa functioned as a director for Holdings from July 2002 until his appointment as a director of American Reprographics Company in October 2004. Mr. Perez de la Mesa has been Chief Executive Officer of SCP Pool Corporation, a wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies and related equipment, since May 2001 and has also been the President of SCP Pool Corporation since February 1999. Mr. Perez de la Mesa served as Chief Operating Officer of SCP Pool Corporation from February 1999 to May 2001.
Board Composition
Prior to our reorganization to a Delaware corporation, we were governed under the direction of a board of advisors, consisting of Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar, Code, Formolo and Marcus J. George, a managing director of CHS. In connection with our reorganization from a limited liability company to a corporation, we have established a board of directors consisting initially of Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar, Code, Formolo, and Perez, who are listed above.
In addition, in order to ensure compliance with the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, the composition of the board of directors may change prior to and following this offering. It is our intention to be in full and timely compliance with all applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange and applicable law, including with respect to the independence of our directors. As discussed in greater detail below, we intend to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the New York Stock Exchange rules which require that, among other things, our audit committee include at least a majority of independent directors within 90 days after the effective date of our registration statement. In addition, within one year after such effectiveness, our audit committee must consist entirely of independent directors.
The board has determined that Mr. Perez is an independent director under the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange. No later than one year after the completion of this offering, we will satisfy the requirements for independent directors contained in the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange through the appointment of three additional independent directors, one of whom will replace one of the five current directors, resulting in a board consisting of seven members, four of whom will be independent.
In accordance with the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be filed prior to the completion of this offering, the board of directors will be elected annually. There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of our company.
Board Compensation
Except for reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses relating to attendance at board meetings and the grant of stock options, employee directors are not compensated for their services as directors. Directors who are not our employees receive cash compensation for their services as directors at a rate of $90,000 per year ($50,000 of which will be payable through annual grants of nonstatutory stock options under our 2005 Stock Plan). In addition, directors who are not our employees will receive $5,000 per year for duties as committee chair. Directors who are our employees are eligible to participate in our 2005 Stock Option Plan and, beginning in 2005, they will also be eligible to participate in our 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. See Benefit Plans.
70
Board Committees
Audit Committee
Presently, our audit committee consists of Messrs. Perez, and . Mr. Perez is an audit committee financial expert and is an independent audit committee member. Our audit committee must have at least one independent member at the time our registration statement becomes effective, as required by the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The audit committee must have a majority of independent members within 90 days after the effective date of our registration statement and the entire audit committee must consist of independent members within one year after the effective date of our registration statement, one of which must be a financial expert. The audit committee will comply with all of the rules governing companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Our audit committee is responsible for reviewing the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls; reviewing the results of the independent accountants annual audit, including any significant adjustments, management judgments and estimates, new accounting policies and disagreements with management; reviewing our audited financial statements and discussing the statements with management; reviewing the audit reports submitted by the independent accountants; reviewing disclosures by independent accountants concerning relationships with our company and the performance of our independent accountants and annually recommending independent accountants; and preparing such reports or statements as may be required by securities laws.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
We do not currently have a nominating committee. The responsibilities of a nominating committee have been assumed by our board of directors. Following the completion of this offering, we will have a corporate governance and nominating committee and anticipate that it will consist of individuals who meet the independence requirements established by the New York Stock Exchange. The corporate governance and nominating committee will, among other things, identify individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors, select or recommend to the board of directors the nominees to stand for election as directors and develop and recommend to the board of directors a set of corporate governance principles. The corporate governance and nominating committee will be governed by a charter that complies with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Compensation Committee
We do not currently have a compensation
committee. The responsibilities of a compensation committee have
been assumed by our board of directors. Following the completion
of this offering, we anticipate that our compensation committee
will consist of individuals meeting the independence
requirements established by the New York Stock Exchange. The
compensation committee will, among other things, review, approve
and make determinations concerning our compensation practices,
policies and procedures for the members of senior management.
The compensation committee will be governed by a charter that
complies with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation
During 2003, our entire board of advisors,
consisting of Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar, Code,
Formolo, and George, determined executive compensation. We did
not have a compensation committee apart from the board of
advisors. During 2003, Mr. Chandramohan served as our Chief
Executive Officer and Mr. Suriyakumar served as our
President and Chief Operating Officer.
Messrs. Code and Formolo, both members of
our board of directors, are affiliated with CHS Management IV,
L.P. We are party to a management agreement with CHS Management
IV, L.P.,
71
Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar, both
members of our board of advisors, are affiliated with Sumo
Holdings LA, LLC, Sumo Holdings San Jose, LLC, Sumo
Holdings Irvine, LLC, Sumo Holdings Sacramento, LLC, Sumo
Holdings Maryland, LLC, and Sumo Holdings Costa Mesa, LLC, each
of which are parties to various real property leases with our
subsidiaries relating to our facilities.
For a further description of the transactions
between the members of our board of directors, their affiliates
and us, see Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.
Executive Compensation
The compensation paid to our Chief Executive
Officer and the only other executive officers who received
compensation in excess of $100,000 for services in all
capacities to our company and our subsidiaries during 2003 is
set forth below. We did not grant any options or membership unit
appreciation rights, restricted units or long-term incentive
plan, or LTIP, awards to our executive officers during 2003.
Summary Compensation Table
Annual Compensation
Other Annual
All Other
Name and Principal Position
Salary
Bonus
Compensation(1)
Compensation
$
600,000
$
$
52,150
(2)
$
288
(3)
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer
600,000
65,527
(4)
288
(3)
President, Chief Operating Officer and
Director
200,000
387,000
1,288
(5)
Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
360,000
2,688
(6)
Chief Technology Officer
(1) | Certain personal benefits provided by us to the named executive officers are not included in the above table as permitted by the SEC regulations because the aggregate amount of such personal benefits for each named executive officer in each year reflected in the table did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the sum of such officers salary and bonus in each respective year. |
(2) | Includes $47,770 for automobile lease payments. |
(3) | Consists of premiums for life insurance. |
(4) | Consists of automobile lease payments. |
(5) | Consists of $288 of premiums for life insurance and $1,000 paid by us as the employer match under our 401(k) plan. |
(6) | Consists of $288 of premiums for life insurance and $2,400 paid by us as the employer match under our 401(k) plan. |
72
Option Grants During the Year Ended December 31, 2003
During 2003, no options to purchase any shares of common stock were granted to the named executive officers listed in the above Summary Compensation Table. None of such persons received awards of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or LTIP awards during 2003.
Aggregated Option Exercises During the Year Ended December 31, 2003 and Value of Options Held at December 31, 2003
The following table provides summary information
concerning the shares of common stock acquired in 2003, the
value realized upon exercise of stock options in 2003, and the
year end number and value of unexercised options with respect to
each of the named executive officers as of December 31,
2003. The value was calculated by determining the difference
between the fair market value of underlying securities and the
exercise price. The fair market value of our common stock at
December 31, 2003 was assumed to be
$ per
share.
Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Number of
Securities
Value of
Underlying
Unexercised
Unexercised
in-the-Money
Options at
Options at
FY-End(#)
FY-End($)
Shares
Acquired on
Value
Exercisable/
Exercisable/
Name
Exercise(#)
Realized($)
Unexercisable
Unexercisable
420,000/280,000
/
During 2004, we granted Mr. Legg an option to purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.62 per share, and granted Mr. Roy an option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.85 per share.
Employment Agreements
We had an agreement with each of Mr. Chandramohan and Mr. Suriyakumar that expired in December 2002. These agreements provided that, at the closing of an acquisition, each would be paid in cash a fee equal to one percent (1%) of the aggregate consideration paid by us in connection with the acquisition (including, without limitation, all interest bearing obligations assumed, the deferred purchase price of property or assets, all non-compete, consulting, employment or lease arrangements and similar forms of consideration). For purposes of these agreements with Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar, acquisition was defined as an acquisition by us of all or substantially all of the outstanding capital stock or of all or substantially all of the assets and business of any person, division or any similar business unit of any person. Since the expiration of these agreements, we have continued to pay Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar acquisition bonuses in accordance with the agreements. These payments will be discontinued upon the consummation of this offering. We intend to enter into new employment agreements with each of our executive officers that will be effective upon the consummation of this offering.
We have entered into a 2004 Bonus Plan with Mr. Legg that provides for the payment to Mr. Legg of (1) a bonus of up to $300,000 based on the financial results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 of three divisions specified in the Bonus Plan (up to $100,000 bonus per division), (2) a bonus of $100,000 for the repayment of no less than $30,700,000 of bank debt by December 31, 2004 (subject to increase for repayments of bank debt above this amount), and (3) a
73
Benefit Plans
American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C. Unit Option Plan II
On January 1, 2001, Holdings adopted the American Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C. Unit Option Plan II, or Unit Plan, under which selected employees, independent advisors, members of the board of advisors of Holdings (or any subsidiary) or members of the board of directors of any subsidiary may be granted common unit options. The members of Holdings approved the Unit Plan on December 22, 2000. Under the Unit Plan, 1,735,415 shares of Holdings plan member common units have been reserved for the grant of options. As of December 31, 2003, options to purchase a total of 1,446,000 plan member common units were outstanding under the Unit Plan. The exercise price of the units is to be determined by the board of advisors, provided, however, that the option price is not to be less than 85% of the fair market value of such unit at the time such option is granted, or, in the case of a person who owns units possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all units of Holdings, 110% of the fair market value of such unit at the time such option is granted. For purposes of the Unit Plan, the term fair market value means the fair market value of a unit determined as of any particular date by the board of advisors, on a fully diluted basis assuming the exercise or conversion of all then exercisable options, warrants, and other rights to purchase units and, to the extent that the board of advisors in its discretion determines to be appropriate, the exercise or conversion of such options, warrants, and other rights to purchase units that are not then exercisable or convertible.
Holdings board of advisors is to determine the vesting period of each option at the date of the grant, provided, however, that except for options granted to officers or consultants, or officers, directors or consultants of any of Holdings subsidiaries, each option shall become exercisable at no lesser rate than 20% for each full year elapsed after the grant of the option and on or before termination of service as an employee until fully exercisable. Upon termination of employment, Holdings and an affiliate of Holdings, ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., have the right to redeem the options. On July 1, 2003, Holdings amended the Unit Plan to extend the exercise period and vesting period for certain optionholders, provided (a) the optionholder had been employed by Holdings or any of its subsidiaries for a period of at least 10 years, (b) the optionholder was at least 55 years old on the date of termination, and (c) the optionholders service with Holdings and any of its subsidiaries terminated because of his or her retirement or any other voluntary reason other than his or her death or permanent disability. If an optionholder satisfies the aforementioned criteria, Holdings may elect to treat the portion of the option that was exercisable on the date of such termination of employment as exercisable by the optionholder until such time that he or she chose to compete (as defined in the Unit Plan) with Holdings or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, as long as the optionholder did not compete with Holdings or any of its subsidiaries, the option would continue to vest according to the Unit Plan and the applicable option agreement.
Upon completion of this offering, members of Holdings will exchange their outstanding options granted under the Unit Plan for options under our 2005 Stock Plan exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to the number of units subject to the Holdings option and with the same exercise price and vesting terms as the Holdings option and all outstanding options under the Unit Plan will be canceled. The Unit Plan will be terminated prior to the completion of this offering, and no additional options will be granted under the Unit Plan.
74
2005 Stock Plan
We will adopt the American Reprographics Company
2005 Stock Plan, and obtain stockholder approval of the plan,
prior to the completion of this offering. Upon our
reorganization, all outstanding options under our Unit Option
Plan will be canceled in exchange for an option under our 2005
Stock Plan exercisable for shares of our common stock equal to
the number of units subject to the Holdings option and with the
same exercise price and vesting terms as the Holdings option.
The 2005 Stock Plan will be administered by our compensation
committee.
Type of
Awards.
The 2005 Stock Plan
provides for the discretionary grant after the consummation of
this offering of incentive stock options (within the provisions
of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code) to employees,
including officers and employee directors, and for the
discretionary grant of nonstatutory stock options, restricted
stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, and stock
appreciation rights to employees, directors and consultants. No
person may be granted options or stock appreciation rights under
the 2005 Stock Plan covering more than 500,000 shares of common
stock in any calendar year.
Reservation of
Shares.
The total shares of common
stock currently reserved and authorized for issuance under the
2005 Stock Plan equals 5,000,000 shares of common stock.
This authorization shall automatically increase annually on the
first day of our fiscal year, from 2006 through and including
2010, by the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the outstanding shares
on the date of the increase; (ii) 300,000 shares; or
(iii) such smaller number of shares determined by our board
of directors. The board may elect to increase, with stockholder
approval, or reduce the number of additional shares authorized
in any given year. In the event of a stock split or other
alteration in our capital structure, appropriate adjustments
will be made to the authorized shares and outstanding awards to
prevent dilution or enlargement of participants rights.
Administration.
Our compensation committee, which generally administers the 2005
Stock Plan, has the authority to determine the terms of the
options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, or stock
appreciation rights granted, including the exercise price of the
option or purchase price for a restricted stock grant or
restricted stock unit; the number of shares subject to each
option or restricted stock grant or the number of restricted
stock units or stock appreciation rights; the vesting and
exercise forms of each award; and the form of consideration
payable upon the exercise of each option or stock purchase right.
Nonassignability.
Generally, options, restricted stock or other awards granted
under our 2005 Stock Plan are not transferable by the
participant, and each option is exercisable during the lifetime
of the participant and only by such participant.
Stock
Options.
The exercise price of
nonstatutory stock options and stock purchase rights granted
under the 2005 Stock Plan is determined by the compensation
committee. With respect to nonstatutory stock options intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation within
the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code,
the exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. Generally, the
exercise price of all incentive stock options must be at least
equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date
of grant. With respect to any participant who owns stock
possessing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of
our outstanding capital stock, the exercise price of any
incentive stock option granted must at least equal 110% of the
fair market value on the grant date and the term of such
incentive stock option must not exceed five years. The term of
all other options granted under the 2005 Stock Plan may not
exceed 10 years. Options granted under the 2005 Stock Plan
vest at the rate specified in the option agreement. Unless the
terms of an optionholders stock option agreement provide
for earlier or later termination, if an optionholders
service with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases due to
disability or death, the optionholder, or his or her
beneficiary, may exercise any vested options up to
12 months, or 18 months in the event of death, after
the date such service ends. If an optionholders service
with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases without cause for any
reason other than disability or death, the optionholder may
exercise any vested options up to three
75
Restricted Stock
Awards.
Restricted stock awards
granted under the 2005 Stock Plan may be either in the form of a
restricted stock purchase right, giving the participant a right
to immediately purchase common stock, or in the form of a
restricted stock award, for which the participant will be
required to furnish consideration in the form of services to us
(in consideration for past services to us). The purchase price
shall be determined by the committee and may be less than the
current fair market value of the common stock. Restricted stock
awards may be subject to vesting conditions based upon such
services to be rendered as specified by the committee, and the
shares acquired may not be transferred by the participant until
vested. If a restricted stock award recipients service
with us, or any affiliate of ours, terminates, we may reacquire
all of the shares of our common stock issued to the recipient
pursuant to a restricted stock award which have not vested as of
the date of termination. Participants holding restricted stock
will be permitted to vote the shares and receive any dividends
paid in cash.
Restricted Stock
Units.
Restricted stock units
granted under the 2005 Stock Plan represent a right to receive
payment for units in the form or cash or shares of our common
stock at a future date determined in accordance with the
participants award agreement. The consideration for a
restricted stock unit award may be payable in any form permitted
under applicable laws. Restricted stock unit awards shall be
granted subject to vesting conditions as determined by the
compensation committee. Participants have no voting rights or
rights to receive cash dividends with respect to restricted
stock unit awards until shares of common stock are issued in
settlement of such awards. However, the compensation committee
may grant restricted stock units that entitle their holders to
receive dividend equivalents, which are rights to receive
additional restricted stock units for a number of shares whose
value is equal to any cash dividends we pay. If a restricted
stock unit award recipients service with us, or any
affiliate of ours, terminates, any unvested portion of the
restricted stock unit award is forfeited upon the
recipients termination of service.
Stock Appreciation
Rights.
A stock appreciation right
provides a participant the right to receive the appreciation in
the fair market value of our common stock between the date of
grant of the award and the date of its exercise. We may pay the
appreciation either in cash or in shares of our common stock. We
may pay cash payments in a lump sum, or we may defer payment in
accordance with the terms of the participants award
agreement. Stock appreciation rights vest and become exercisable
at the times and on the terms established by the compensation
committee. The maximum term of any stock appreciation right is
10 years. If a stock appreciation right recipients
service with us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases for any
reason, the recipient may exercise any vested stock appreciation
right up to three months from cessation of service, unless the
terms of the stock appreciation right agreement provide for
earlier or later termination.
Non-Employee Director
Awards.
Commencing with our first
annual meeting of stockholders (on or after the effective date
of this offering), each non-employee director automatically will
receive a nonstatutory stock option with a fair market value, as
determined under the Black-Scholes option pricing formula, equal
to $50,000 (or 55.56%) of such non-employee directors
annual cash compensation (exclusive of committee fees). Each
nonstatutory stock option will cover his or her service since
either the previous annual meeting or the date on which he or
she was first elected or appointed.
Corporate Transactions and Change in
Control.
In the event of certain
corporate transactions, the surviving entity may assume all
stock-based awards outstanding under the 2005 Stock Plan or
substitute substantially equivalent awards. If the surviving
entity elects not to assume or substitute for all such awards,
then with respect to stock-based awards held by persons
providing us or any of our affiliates service, the vesting (and,
if applicable, the time during which the award
76
Amendment and
Termination.
The 2005 Stock Plan
will continue in effect until the tenth anniversary of its
approval by the board of directors or our stockholders,
whichever is earlier, unless earlier terminated by the board of
directors. The board of directors may amend, suspend or
terminate the 2005 Stock Plan at any time, provided that without
stockholder approval, the plan cannot be amended to increase the
number of shares authorized, change the class of persons
eligible to receive incentive stock options or effect any other
change that would require stockholder approval under any
applicable law or listing rule. Amendment, suspension or
termination of the 2005 Stock Plan may not adversely affect any
outstanding award without the consent of the participant, unless
such amendment, suspension or termination is necessary to comply
with applicable laws, regulations or rules.
2005 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
We will adopt the American Reprographics Company
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, and obtain
stockholder approval of the plan, prior to the completion of
this offering.
Purpose.
The
purpose of the ESPP is to advance our interests and the
interests of our stockholders by providing an incentive to
attract, retain and reward eligible employees. It is intended to
qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Shares Subject to Purchase
Plan.
A total of
750,000 shares of our common stock are initially authorized
and reserved for sale under the ESPP. Appropriate adjustments
will be made in the number of authorized shares and in
outstanding purchase rights to prevent dilution or enlargement
of participants rights in the event of a stock split or
other change in our capital structure.
Administration.
Our board of directors or a committee of the board will serve as
administrator of the ESPP. The administrator has the authority
to construe and interpret the terms of the ESPP and the purchase
rights granted under it, to determine eligibility to
participate, and to establish policies and procedures for
administration of the plan.
Eligibility.
Our employees and employees of any parent corporation designated
by the administrator are eligible to participate in the ESPP if
they are customarily employed by us for more than 20 hours
per week and more than five months in any calendar year.
However, an employee may not be granted a right to purchase
stock under the ESPP if: (1) the employee immediately after
grant would own stock possessing 5 percent or more of the
total combined voting power or value of all classes of our
capital stock or of any parent or subsidiary corporation, or
(2) the employees rights to purchase stock under all
of our employee stock purchase plans would accrue at a rate that
exceeds $25,000 in value for each calendar year of participation
in such plans.
Offerings.
The ESPP is implemented by offerings of purchase rights to
eligible employees. Under the ESPP, we may specify offerings
with a duration of not more than 27 months, and may specify
shorter purchase periods within each offering. A new offering
will automatically begin on March 1 and September 1 of
each year, will generally be 24 months in duration and will
consist of four six-month purchase periods, except that the
first offering will commence on the effective date of the ESPP
and will end on August 31, 2005. The administrator is
authorized to establish additional or alternative sequential or
overlapping offering periods and offering periods having a
different duration or different starting or ending dates,
provided that no offering period may have a duration exceeding
27 months.
Participation.
Eligible employees who enroll in the ESPP may elect to have up
to 15 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and
accumulated for the purchase of shares at the end of each
purchase period in each offering in which they participate.
However, all eligible employees will
77
Purchase of
Shares.
Amounts accumulated for
each participant are used to purchase shares of our common stock
at the end of each purchase period at a price generally equal to
85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of our
common stock at the beginning of an offering period or at the
end of the corresponding purchase period. Prior to commencement
of an offering period, the administrator is authorized to
reduce, but not increase, this purchase price discount for that
offering period, or, under the circumstances described in the
ESPP, during that offering period; provided that such purchase
price discount complies with the applicable provisions of
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum
number of shares a participant may purchase in any calendar year
is the lesser of 400 shares or a number of shares having a
fair market value of $10,000 (determined on the date of
purchase). Prior to the beginning of any offering period, the
administrator may alter the maximum number of shares that may be
purchased by any participant during the offering period or
specify a maximum aggregate number of shares that may be
purchased by all participants in the offering period. If an
insufficient number of shares remain available under the plan to
permit all participants to purchase the number of shares to
which they would otherwise be entitled, the administrator will
make a pro rata allocation of the available shares. Any amounts
withheld from participants compensation in excess of the
amounts used to purchase shares will be refunded, without
interest, or held in the participants account for the
purchase of shares under the next offering period.
Corporate
Transactions.
In the event of
certain corporate transactions, an acquiring or successor
corporation may assume our rights and obligations under the
ESPP. If the acquiring or successor corporation does not assume
such rights and obligations or does not substitute them with
similar rights and obligations, then the purchase date of the
offering periods then in progress will be accelerated to a date
prior to the effective time of the corporate transaction.
Nonassignability.
Rights granted under the ESPP are not transferable by a
participant other than by will or the laws of descent and
distribution. However, a participant may designate a beneficiary
who is to receive any cash and/or shares from the
participants account in the event the participants
death.
Amendment and
Termination.
The ESPP will
continue in effect until terminated by the administrator. The
administrator may amend, suspend or terminate the ESPP at any
time, provided that unless stockholder approval is obtained
within 12 months of such amendment, the plan cannot be
amended to increase the number of shares authorized or change
the definition of the corporations that may be designated by the
administrator for participation in the plan. Amendment,
suspension or termination of the ESPP may not adversely affect
any purchase rights previously granted without the consent of
the participant, unless such amendment, suspension or
termination is necessary to qualify the plan under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code or to comply with
applicable law, or is effected after a determination by the
administrator that continuation of the plan or an offering
period would result in unfavorable accounting consequences to us
as a result of a change, after the plans effective date,
in the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to
the ESPP.
78
401(k) Plan
Holdings sponsors a defined contribution plan
intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal
Revenue Code covering substantially all employees who are at
least 21 years of age. Plan participants may contribute up
to 75% of their annual eligible compensation, subject to
contribution limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue
Service. Holdings matches up to 20% of a participants
contributions up to a maximum of 4% of their eligible annual
compensation.
79
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Certain of our directors, executive officers, 5% beneficial owners and their affiliates have engaged in transactions with us in the ordinary course of business. We believe these transactions involved terms comparable to, or more favorable to us than, terms that would be obtained from an unaffiliated third party. The following is a description of these transactions:
Related Party Leases and Purchases
We are party to certain leases with entities owned by Mr. Chandramohan and Mr. Suriyakumar for our facilities located in Los Angeles, California, San Jose, California, Irvine, California, Sacramento, California, Oakland, California, Gaithersburg, Maryland, and Costa Mesa, California. Under these leases, we paid these entities rent in the aggregate amount of approximately $1,036,356 in 2001, $1,092,600 in 2002, $1,092,600 in 2003, and $744,590 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. We are also obligated to reimburse these entities for certain real property taxes and assessments. These leases expire between January 2006 and December 2013.
We sell certain products and services to Thomas Reprographics, Inc. and Albinson Inc., each of which is owned or controlled by William Thomas, who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common equity. These companies purchased products and services from us of approximately $215,000 and $95,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and $32,000 during the six months ended 2004.
Management Agreement
We are party to a management agreement with CHS Management IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Messrs. Code and Formolo, both members of our board of directors, have a direct beneficial ownership in CHS Management IV, L.P. Under the management agreement, we paid CHS Management IV, L.P. a management fee of $803,000 in 2001, $889,000 in 2002 and $858,000 in 2003, and we anticipate paying CHS Management IV, L.P. a management fee of $858,000 in 2004. The annual management fee is subject to an annual increase based on our financial results but shall not exceed $1,000,000 annually. This management fee is in consideration of CHS Management IV, L.P. providing ongoing consulting and management advisory services to us. Our board of directors may terminate the management agreement if it determines in good faith that CHS Management IV, L.P. has materially failed to diligently provide such management services. This management agreement will be terminated upon our initial public offering.
Indemnification Agreements
We will enter into indemnification agreements with each director which provide indemnification under certain circumstances for acts and omissions which may not be covered by any directors and officers liability insurance. The indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers and directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as officers and directors (other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature), to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to obtain officers and directors insurance if available on reasonable terms.
Registration Rights Agreement
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with certain holders of our common stock and holders of warrants to purchase our common stock, including entities affiliated with certain of our executive officers and directors. The holders of 27,220,839 shares of common stock and the holders of 1,168,842 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants are entitled to certain rights with respect to the registration of such shares under the Securities Act. For more detailed
80
Investor Unitholders Agreement
Holdings entered into an Investor Unitholders Agreement with ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. and certain other parties that hold warrants to purchase Holdings common units. Under this agreement, subject to certain exceptions, (i) Holdings has a right of first refusal in connection with a transfer of units acquired by the warrant holders, (ii) the warrant holders have a right to participate in transfers of units by ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., (iii) ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. has limited preemptive rights in connection with an issuance of units by Holdings to the warrant holders and the warrant holders have limited preemptive rights in connection with an issuance of units by Holdings to ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., (iv) the warrant holders have the right to receive certain financial information from Holdings, and (v) the warrant holders have certain property inspection rights. The Investor Unitholders Agreement will be terminated upon the consummation of this offering.
81
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information, as of September 30, 2004, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock: (1) immediately prior to the consummation of the offering, but after giving effect to our reorganization; and (2) as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares of common stock in this offering, by:
| each of our directors and named executive officers; |
| all directors and named executive officers as a group; |
| each person who is known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock; and |
| each of the selling stockholders. |
The table includes all shares of common stock
issuable within 60 days of September 30, 2004 upon the
exercise of options and other rights beneficially owned by the
indicated stockholders on that date. Beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes
voting and investment power with respect to shares. To our
knowledge, except under applicable community property laws or as
otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons
named in the table have sole voting and sole investment control
regarding all shares beneficially owned. The applicable
percentage of ownership for each stockholder is based on
35,487,511 shares of common stock outstanding as of
September 30, 2004, together with applicable options for
that stockholder. Shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of options and other rights beneficially owned were deemed
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of the person holding these options and other rights,
but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage
ownership of any other person.
Shares Beneficially
Shares Beneficially
Owned
Owned
Prior to Offering
After Offering***
Number of
Name and Address*
Number
Percent
Shares Offered(1)
Number
Percent
17,334,221
48.9
%
7,064,964
19.9
%
5,075,964
14.3
%
4,616,631
13.0
%
17,334,221
48.9
%
17,334,221
48.9
%
14,810,502
41.7
%
14,777,145
41.6
%
637,500
1.8
%
335,001
1.0
%
82
Shares Beneficially
Shares Beneficially
Owned
Owned
Prior to Offering
After Offering***
Number of
Name and Address*
Number
Percent
Shares Offered(1)
Number
Percent
37,000
**
33,276,366
92.3
%
1,656,051
4.7
%
858,024
2.4
%
459,333
1.3
%
300,000
**
300,000
**
225,000
**
75,000
**
41,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
35,001
**
28,465
**
9,000
**
1,473
**
* | Except as otherwise noted, the address of each person listed in the table is c/o American Reprographics Company, 700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550, Glendale, California 91203. |
** | Less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock. |
*** | Assumes underwriters have not exercised their option to purchase additional shares. | |
(1) | If the underwriters overallotment option is exercised in full, the additional shares sold would be allocated among the selling stockholders as follows: |
Shares Beneficially | ||||||||||||
Owned Assuming | ||||||||||||
Exercise of | ||||||||||||
Shares Beneficially | Overallotment | |||||||||||
Owned Subject to | Option | |||||||||||
Overallotment |
|
|||||||||||
Selling Stockholders | Option | Number | Percent | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||
Andrew W. Code(5)
|
||||||||||||
Thomas J. Formolo(5)
|
||||||||||||
CHS Associates IV, L.P.
|
||||||||||||
Paige Walsh
|
If the underwriters overallotment option is exercised in part, the additional shares sold would be allocated pro rata based upon the share amounts set forth in the preceding table. |
83
(2) | The sole member of ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. is Code Hennessey Simmons IV, L.P. The general partner of Code Hennessy Simmons IV, L.P. is CHS Management IV, L.P. The general partner of CHS Management IV, L.P. is Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC. Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC, CHS Management IV, L.P. and Code Hennessy Simmons IV, L.P. may be deemed to beneficially own these shares, but disclaim beneficial ownership of shares in which they do not have a pecuniary interest. The investment committee of Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC is composed of Andrew W. Code, Daniel J. Hennessy, Brian P. Simmons, Thomas J. Formolo, Jon S. Vesely and Peter M. Gotsch. Messrs. Code, Hennessy, Simmons, Formolo, Vesely and Gotsch may be deemed to beneficially own these shares due to the fact that they share investment and voting control over shares held by ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., but disclaim beneficial ownership of shares in which they do not have a pecuniary interest. | |
(3) | Includes 4,616,631 shares held by OCB Reprographics, Inc. As Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar and Thomas have ownership interests of 22.4%, 17.6% and 40%, respectively, in OCB Reprographics, Inc. and serve on its Board of Directors, each could be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all these shares. Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of each of their pecuniary interests therein. | |
(4) | Includes 459,333 shares held by Color Expressions of California, Inc. As Messrs. Chandramohan, Suriyakumar and Thomas have ownership interests of 24.8%, 19.5% and 26.7%, respectively, in Color Expressions of California, Inc. and serve on its Board of Directors, each could be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all these shares. Messrs. Chandramohan and, Suriyakumar each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of each of their pecuniary interests therein. | |
(5) | Andrew W. Code and Thomas J. Formolo are members of the investment committee of Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC, the general partner of CHS Management IV, L.P., which in turn is the general partner of Code, Hennessy & Simmons IV, L.P., which is the sole member of ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C. Messrs. Code and Formolo may be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned by ARC Acquisition Co., L.L.C., but disclaim beneficial ownership of shares in which they do not have a pecuniary interest. | |
(6) | Includes 7,064,964 shares held by Micro-Device, Inc. As Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar have ownership interests of 56% and 44%, respectively, in Micro-Device, Inc. and serve on its Board of Directors, each could be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all these shares. Messrs. Chandramohan and Suriyakumar each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of each of their pecuniary interests therein. |