As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 18, 2006
Registration
No. 333-135584
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
OCULUS INNOVATIVE SCIENCES,
INC.
(
Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
California (prior to
reincorporation)
Delaware (after reincorporation)
(
State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
3841
(
Primary
Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
68-0423298
(
I.R.S.
Employer
Identification No.)
|
1129 N. McDowell
Blvd.
Petaluma, CA 94954
(707) 782-0792
(
Address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Hojabr Alimi
Chief Executive Officer and
President
1129 N. McDowell
Blvd.
Petaluma, CA 94954
(707) 782-0792
(
Name,
address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Sylvia K. Burks, Esq.
Gabriella A. Lombardi, Esq.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA
94304-1114
(650) 233-4500
(650) 233-4545
facsimile
|
|
Michael W. Hall, Esq.
William C. Davisson III, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 328-4600
(650) 463-2600 facsimile
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public:
As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box.
o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and we are not soliciting any offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 2006
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Shares
Oculus
Innovative Sciences, Inc.
Common
Stock
We are
offering shares
of our common stock. This is our initial public offering, and no
public market currently exists for our shares. We anticipate
that the initial public offering price will be between
$ and
$ per share. We have applied
for quotation of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market
under the symbol “OCLS.”
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before buying any shares, you should carefully consider the risk
factors described in “Risk Factors” beginning on
page 8 of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to
Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The underwriters may also purchase up to an
additional shares from us at
the public offering price, less the underwriting discount,
within 30 days after the date of this prospectus to cover
over-allotments.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares on or
about ,
2006.
|
|
A.G.
Edwards
|
Jefferies &
Company
|
|
|
First
Albany Capital
|
C.E.
Unterberg, Towbin
|
The date of this
prospectus
is ,
2006
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We
are not making an offer to sell these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. You should not
assume that the information contained in this prospectus is
accurate as of any date other than the respective dates as of
which the information is given.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
Before you decide whether to invest in our common stock, you
should carefully read this entire prospectus, including
“Risk Factors” and the consolidated financial
statements and related notes. In this prospectus,
“we,” “us,” “our” and
“Oculus” refer to Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context requires
otherwise.
Oculus
Innovative Sciences, Inc.
We develop, manufacture and market a family of products intended
to prevent and eliminate infection in chronic and acute wounds.
Infection is a serious potential complication in both chronic
and acute wounds, and controlling infection is a critical step
in wound healing. Our platform technology, called Microcyn, is a
non-toxic, super-oxidized water-based solution that is designed
to eliminate a wide range of pathogens including viruses, fungi,
spores and antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria such as
Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus,
or MRSA, and
Vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus
, or VRE, in wounds. In
clinical testing, our products eliminated a wide range of
pathogens and were found to be safe, easy to use and
complementary to most existing treatment methods in wound care.
Our experience and clinical data indicate that the use of
Microcyn may shorten hospital stays, lower aggregate patient
care costs and, in certain cases, reduce the need for systemic
antibiotics. Microcyn also has applications in several other
large consumer and professional markets, including respiratory,
dermatology, mold and atmospheric remediation, hard surface
disinfectant and dental markets.
We believe Microcyn provides significant advantages over current
methods of care in the treatment of a wide range of chronic and
acute wounds throughout all stages of treatment. We believe that
Microcyn is the first topical product that eliminates a broad
range of bacteria and other infectious microbes without causing
toxic side effects on, or irritation of, healthy tissue. Unlike
most antibiotics, we believe Microcyn does not target specific
strains of bacteria, a practice which has been shown to promote
the development of resistant bacteria. Because our products are
shelf stable and require no special preparation, they can be
used in hospitals, clinics, burn centers, extended care
facilities and in the home.
Our products have received CE Mark approval for wound cleaning
and reduction of infection, three U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, or FDA, 510(k) clearances as a medical device in
wound debridement, lubricating, moistening and dressing and have
been granted approval for use as an antiseptic, disinfectant and
sterilant in Mexico. Physicians in several countries have
conducted studies in which Microcyn eliminated infection in a
variety of wounds, including
hard-to-treat
wounds such as diabetic ulcers and burns, and, in some cases,
reduced the need for systemic antibiotics. In July 2006, we
completed a pivotal clinical trial for pre-operative skin
preparation. The FDA has requested an additional pivotal trial
and additional microbiology and dermatology studies. Before we
initiate our second pivotal trial, we plan to discuss with the
FDA its request for an additional pivotal trial and additional
data. Depending on the results of these discussions, we may
reassess our priorities, clinical timelines and schedules for
filing the NDA for pre-operative skin preparation. In the event
that we proceed with the second pivotal trial and, assuming that
the second pivotal trial and the additional studies are
successful, we intend to file a New Drug Application, or NDA,
for the use of Microcyn as a pre-operative skin preparation in
late 2007. In addition, we intend to seek FDA approval for the
use of Microcyn to eliminate infection and accelerate healing in
wounds. We have established a protocol, based on comments from
the FDA, for a clinical trial to be conducted in patients with
diabetic foot ulcers and other open wounds comparing clinical
cure rates and the rate of wound healing comparing our product
with existing treatments.
We began selling our Microcyn-based product in July 2004 in
Mexico, where we sell through a dedicated
75-person
contract sales force, and in October 2004 in Europe, where we
have a seven-person direct sales force and exclusive
distribution agreements with four distributors experienced in
supplying the wound care market, with an aggregate combined
sales force of over 25 full-time equivalent salespeople. We
began selling our products in the United States in June 2005 and
have established a network of one national and five regional
distributors supported by our medical and clinical employees.
1
We currently offer the following products:
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
Brand Name
|
|
Indication
|
|
United States
|
|
Dermacyn Wound Care
|
|
A medical device product intended
for moistening absorbent wound dressings and cleaning,
moistening, lubricating and debriding specified types of wounds.
|
|
|
Vetericyn Wound Care
|
|
A product used for the management
of traumatic wounds, cuts, abrasions, skin irritations,
post-surgical incisions and minor burns in animals.
|
European Union
|
|
Dermacyn Wound Care
|
|
A product intended for the
reduction of microbial load for use in debriding, irrigating and
moistening specified types of wounds.
|
|
|
Oculus Microcyn Disinfectant
|
|
A disinfectant solution for
medical devices.
|
Mexico
|
|
Microcyn60
|
|
A product used for the antiseptic
treatment of wounds and infected areas and for the disinfection
of medical instruments and equipment and clean-rooms.
|
India
|
|
Oxum
|
|
A product intended for use in
cleaning and debriding in wound management.
|
Canada
|
|
Dermacyn Wound Care
|
|
A product used in moistening,
irrigating, cleansing and debriding skin lesions.
|
In the event that we proceed with the second pivotal trial for
pre-operative skin preparation, upon successful completion of
that trial and additional clinical studies and receipt of the
necessary FDA regulatory approvals, we plan to market Microcyn
in the United States as a drug used for pre-operative skin
preparation.
Market
Opportunity
According to Medtech Insight, a Division of Windhover
Information, there were over 90 million incidents of wounds
in the United States during 2004. Of these, over 6 million
were chronic wounds, including arterial, diabetic, pressure and
venous ulcers. The remaining 84 million incidents were
acute wounds, which follow the normal process of healing and
commonly include burns, traumatic wounds and approximately
67 million surgical incisions. Key trends in wound care
include a large and increasing at-risk population, primarily of
elderly, diabetic and obese people, increased emphasis on
controlling the cost of patient care, technological product and
treatment innovation, increased focus on improving the patient
experience and advancements in combination treatment methods.
When infection is present in a wound, standard treatments
include cleansing, debridement and systemic antibiotics.
Although there are a number of topical antiseptics and
antibiotics currently used to treat acute and chronic wounds,
their overall effectiveness is limited. For example:
|
|
|
|
•
|
many antiseptics, including Betadine, hydrogen peroxide and
Dakin’s solution, are toxic, can destroy human cells and
tissue, may cause allergic reactions and can impede the wound
healing process;
|
|
|
•
|
silver-based products are expensive and require precise dosage
and close monitoring by trained medical staff to minimize the
potential for allergic reactions and bacterial
resistance; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the increase in antibiotic resistant bacterial strains, such as
MRSA and VRE, have compromised the efficacy of some widely used
topical antibiotics, including Neosporin and Bacitracin.
|
2
Our
Solution
We believe our products have the following key features:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Effective.
In physician clinical
testing, our products eliminated a wide range of bacteria that
cause infection in a variety of acute and chronic wounds. In
addition, we believe that, because of its mechanism of action,
Microcyn does not target specific strains of bacteria, the
practice of which has been shown to promote the development of
resistant bacteria. Where Microcyn was used both independently
from and in conjunction with other wound care therapeutic
products, patients generally experienced less pain, improved
mobility and physical activity levels and better quality of life.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Safe.
Clinical data shows that our
products are non-toxic, do not cause skin irritation and do not
inhibit wound healing. Throughout all our clinical trials and
physician clinical studies to date and since commercialization
in 2004, we have received no reports of adverse events related
to the use of Microcyn products.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Easy to Use.
Our products require no
preparation before use or at time of disposal, and caregivers
can use our products without significant training. In addition,
Microcyn can be stored at room temperature and does not require
any specific handling procedures. Unlike other super-oxidized
water solutions, which are typically stable for not more than
48 hours, our laboratory tests show that Microcyn has a
shelf life ranging from one to two years, depending on the size
and type of packaging. Our products are also complementary to
most advanced technologies used to treat serious wounds, such as
negative pressure wound therapy, jet lavage and
tissue-engineered skin substitutes.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Cost Effective.
Treatment of many
wounds requires extended hospitalization and care, including the
use of expensive systemic antibiotics. Infection prolongs the
healing time and increases the use of systemic antibiotics. Our
clinical trials and physician clinical studies indicate that
Microcyn eliminates infection, can accelerate healing time and,
in certain cases, reduces the use of systemic antibiotics,
thereby lowering overall patient cost.
|
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to become a worldwide leader in wound care by
establishing Microcyn as the standard of care for controlling
infection in chronic and acute wounds throughout all stages of
treatment. We also intend to leverage our expertise in wound
care into additional market opportunities. The key elements of
our strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
drive adoption of Microcyn as the standard of care in the wound
care market to prevent and eliminate infection;
|
|
|
•
|
obtain additional regulatory approvals in the United States;
|
|
|
•
|
expand our direct sales force and distribution networks;
|
|
|
•
|
pursue opportunities to combine Microcyn with other treatments;
|
|
|
•
|
develop strategic collaborations in the wound care
market; and
|
|
|
•
|
leverage our Microcyn platform to address additional markets.
|
Principal
Risks
There are significant risks and challenges relating to our
business and industry that may materially and adversely affect
our ability to execute our strategy and achieve our objectives,
including the following risks:
|
|
|
|
•
|
we have a history of losses, expect to continue to incur losses
and may never achieve profitability;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
all of our current products are based on our Microcyn platform
technology;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Microcyn was recently found to be ineffective as a high level
disinfectant in killing certain strains of pathogens under
current Environmental Protection Agency testing protocols;
|
3
|
|
|
|
•
|
we do not have regulatory approval to market Microcyn as a drug
in the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we are required to conduct lengthy and expensive clinical
trials, which may not be successful or lead to regulatory
approvals; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
in connection with their dismissal in April 2006, our
former independent registered public accounting firm has
notified us of a number of reportable events it deemed to
constitute material weaknesses over financial reporting that
could impact our ability to develop reliable financial
statements in a timely manner.
|
Recent
Developments
On September 14, 2006, we sold 338,156 units, consisting of
338,156 shares of our Series C convertible preferred
stock and warrants to purchase 67,631 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, at a per
unit price of $4.50 for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,521,702.
In connection with this sale, we paid to Brookstreet Securities
Corporation, as placement agent, an aggregate of $152,170 in
commissions and issued to Brookstreet fully vested warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 42,269 shares of our common stock
at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. We refer to this
transaction as the Series C Financing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Corporate
Information
We were incorporated in California in 1999 as Micromed
Laboratories, Inc. In August 2001, we changed our name to Oculus
Innovative Sciences, Inc. In connection with this offering, we
intend to reincorporate in Delaware. Our principal executive
offices are located at 1129 N. McDowell Blvd.,
Petaluma, California, 94954, and our telephone number is
(707) 782-0792.
We have two principal subsidiaries: Oculus Technologies of
Mexico, S.A. de C.V., organized in Mexico, and Oculus Innovative
Sciences Netherlands, B.V., organized in The Netherlands. Our
website is
www.oculusis.com.
Information that is included
on our website is not a part of this prospectus.
We currently use
Microcyn, Dermacyn
and
Vetericyn
,
which are registered trademarks, and our Oculus Innovative
Sciences logo as trademarks in the United States and certain
other countries. We have applied to the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office to register our Oculus Innovative Sciences
logo. We are also seeking U.S. trademark registrations for
Cidalcyn
and
Dentricyn.
All other trademarks,
trade names or services marks appearing in this prospectus are
the property of their respective holders.
Our human wound treatment product is marketed under the name
Dermacyn in the United States and the European Union and under
the name Microcyn60 in Mexico. We may agree to cease marketing
our product in Mexico under the name Microcyn60 as a result of
the proposed settlement of a trademark confusion claim in
Mexico. All references in this prospectus to Microcyn as a
product are to the products marketed under their respective
names. Other references to Microcyn are to our platform
technology used in producing our products for wound care and for
other markets.
4
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock to be offered by us
|
|
shares
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering
|
|
shares
|
|
Initial public offering price per share
|
|
$
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to expand
our sales and marketing capabilities, to fund clinical trials
and related research, to expand our manufacturing capabilities
and for general corporate purposes, including working capital.
See “Use of Proceeds.”
|
|
|
|
Proposed Nasdaq Global Market symbol
|
|
OCLS
|
The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding
immediately after this offering is based upon
32,825,646 shares of common stock outstanding as of
June 30, 2006 and does not include:
|
|
|
|
•
|
8,741,074 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options and options to be granted
in connection with this offering, at a weighted-average exercise
price of $1.19 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
3,892,296 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants, at a weighted average exercise
price of $2.66 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
up
to additional
shares of our common stock reserved for future grants under our
equity plans, including our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
Unless we indicate otherwise, all information in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
•
|
gives effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of our
preferred stock into 15,934,718 shares of our common stock
upon the completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
does not reflect the exercise of outstanding warrants or options
to purchase shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
•
|
assumes that the underwriters do not exercise their
over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this
offering;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
reflects a -for-one reverse split of our common stock
to be effected before completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
reflects our reincorporation in Delaware from California; and
|
|
|
•
|
reflects the amendment of our certificate of incorporation in
connection with this offering to, among other things, change the
number of shares authorized for issuance.
|
5
Summary
Consolidated Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share data)
The following tables present our summary consolidated financial
data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected in the future. You should read
this information together with our audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes and the information under
“Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
The following tables present our summary financial data:
|
|
|
|
•
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to the automatic conversion
of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock
into 15,934,718 shares of our common stock upon the closing
of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the completion of the Series C Financing; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share, after deducting the underwriting discount and our
estimated offering expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
1,966
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Service
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
(1)
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Service
(1)
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
(2,166
|
)
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
373
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and
development
(1)
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
(1)
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
12,492
|
|
|
|
15,933
|
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
18,533
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(7,097
|
)
|
|
|
(16,312
|
)
|
|
|
(20,851
|
)
|
|
|
(3,984
|
)
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(21,118
|
)
|
|
|
(4,065
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
Loss on discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(23,099
|
)
|
|
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: basic
and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares
used in per common share calculations: basic and diluted
|
|
|
15,647
|
|
|
|
15,659
|
|
|
|
16,602
|
|
|
|
15,878
|
|
|
|
16,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per common
share: basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted-average number
of shares used in per common share calculations: basic and
diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the following stock-based compensation charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Service
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
(1)
|
|
$
|
6,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
(1)
|
|
|
3,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
(1)
|
|
|
13,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’
equity
(1)
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase or decrease, as applicable, this amount on a pro
forma as adjusted basis by approximately
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the
underwriting discount and our estimated offering expenses.
|
7
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below with all
of the other information included in this prospectus before
making an investment decision. If any of the following risks
actually occur, our business, results of operations or financial
condition would likely suffer. In that case, the market price of
our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of
your investment in our common stock. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We have a
history of losses, we expect to continue to incur losses and we
may never achieve profitability.
We have incurred significant net losses in each fiscal year
since our inception, including losses of $7.3 million,
$16.5 million, $23.1 million and $4.3 million for
the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the three
months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Our accumulated
deficit as of June 30, 2006 was $54.7 million. We have
yet to demonstrate that we can generate sufficient sales of our
products to become profitable. The extent of our future
operating losses and the timing of profitability are highly
uncertain, and we may never achieve profitability. Even if we do
generate significant revenues from our product sales, we expect
that increased operating expenses will result in significant
operating losses in the near term as we, among other things:
|
|
|
|
•
|
expand our sales and marketing capabilities in the United States
and internationally;
|
|
|
•
|
conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials on our products
and product candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
seek Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, clearance to market
Microcyn as a drug in the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
increase our research and development efforts to enhance our
existing products, commercialize new products and develop new
product candidates; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
establish additional and expand existing manufacturing
facilities.
|
As a result of these activities, we will need to generate
significant revenue in order to achieve profitability and may
never become profitable. We must also maintain specified cash
reserves in connection with our loan and security agreement
which may limit our investment opportunities. Failure to
maintain these reserves could result in our lender foreclosing
against our assets or imposing significant restrictions on our
operations. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be
able to sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing basis.
Because
all of our products are based on our Microcyn platform
technology, we will need to generate sufficient revenues from
the sale of Microcyn to execute our business plan.
All of our products are based on our Microcyn platform
technology, and we do not have any non-Microcyn product
candidates that will generate revenues in the foreseeable
future. Accordingly, we expect to derive substantially all of
our future revenues from sales of our Microcyn products. We have
only been selling our products since July 2004, and
substantially all of our historical product revenues have been
from sales of Microcyn in Mexico. Although we began selling in
Europe in October 2004 and in the United States in June 2005,
our product revenues outside of Mexico to date have not been
significant. For example, product revenues from countries
outside of Mexico were 34.3% of our product revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, but were just 9.1% of our
product revenues for the year ended March 31, 2006.
Microcyn has not been adopted as a standard of care for wound
treatment in any country and may not gain acceptance among
physicians, nurses, patients, third-party payors and the medical
community. Existing protocols for wound care are well
established within the medical community and tend to vary
geographically, and healthcare providers may be reluctant to
alter their protocols to include the use of Microcyn. If
Microcyn does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we
will not generate sufficient revenues to become profitable.
8
One of
our products was recently found to be ineffective as a high
level disinfectant in killing certain strains of pathogens under
current Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, testing
protocols. As a result, we have discontinued marketing our
Cidalcyn disinfectant.
We previously offered our Microcyn-based pesticide product,
Cidalcyn, as a hospital disinfectant, and stated on its label,
registered with the EPA, that it was effective in eliminating a
broad range of bacteria, as well as the HIV virus and certain
fungi. Although we have not marketed Cidalcyn on a large
commercial scale, we have provided it in small quantities to
numerous hospitals for use in product evaluation. In August
2006, we received a “show cause” letter from the EPA,
which stated that, in tests conducted by the EPA, Cidalcyn was
found to be ineffective in killing three specified pathogens
(pseudomonas aeginose, staphylococcus aureus and mycobacterium
tuberculosis) when used according to label directions, which
prevents us from marketing Cidalcyn as a hospital grade
disinfectant. Our subsequent testing has confirmed two of the
three EPA results. Based on its results, the EPA strongly
recommended that we immediately recall all Cidalcyn distributed
on and after September 28, 2005. Accordingly, we have
commenced a voluntary recall of Cidalcyn under the current
label. In a second letter, the EPA stated it intended to file a
civil administrative complaint against us for violation of
federal pesticide legislation. The EPA could assess civil
penalties related to the sale and distribution of a pesticide
product that does not meet the label’s claims. We believe
that such civil penalties could be up to $200,000. The EPA could
also require us to stop selling our product, or require us to
remove Cidalcyn from the market. Unless and until we prove the
label claims of Cidalcyn to the EPA, there will not be any
further sales of the product in the United States.
We do not
have the necessary regulatory approvals to market Microcyn as a
drug in the United States.
We have obtained three 510(k) clearances in the United States
that permit us to sell Microcyn as a medical device to clean,
moisten and debride wounds. However, we do not have the
necessary regulatory approvals to market Microcyn in the United
States as a drug, which we will need to obtain in order to
execute our business plan. Before we are permitted to sell
Microcyn as a drug in the United States, we must, among other
things, successfully complete additional well-controlled
clinical trials, submit a New Drug Application, or NDA, to the
FDA and obtain FDA approval. At a meeting in August 2006, the
FDA requested an additional pivotal trial and additional
microbiology and dermatology studies. We expect that this second
pivotal trial will have the same design, size and endpoints as
our prior pivotal trial, which was completed in July 2006. In
the event that we proceed with the second pivotal trial and,
assuming that the second pivotal trial and these additional
studies are successful, we intend to file an NDA for Microcyn as
a pre-operative skin preparation in late 2007. We also intend to
seek FDA approval for the use of Microcyn to eliminate infection
and accelerate healing in wounds. The FDA approval process is
expensive and uncertain, requires detailed and comprehensive
scientific and other data and generally takes several years.
Despite the time and expense exerted, approval is never
guaranteed. We do not know whether we will obtain the necessary
regulatory approvals to market Microcyn as a drug in the United
States. We anticipate that the earliest we could obtain approval
to sell Microcyn as a pre-operative skin preparation in the
United States is 2008, and any approval for the use of Microcyn
to eliminate infection in wounds in the United States will take
even longer. Even if we obtain FDA approval to sell Microcyn as
a drug, we may not be able to successfully commercialize
Microcyn as a drug in the United States and may never recover
the substantial costs we have invested in the development of our
Microcyn products.
Our
inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms in the
future may limit our ability to develop and commercialize new
products and technologies.
We expect capital outlays and operating expenditures to increase
over the next several years as we work to commercialize our
products and expand our infrastructure and research and
development activities. We may need to raise additional capital
to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
•
|
sustain commercialization of our current products or new
products;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
increase our sales and marketing efforts to drive market
adoption and address competitive developments;
|
9
|
|
|
|
•
|
fund our clinical trials and preclinical studies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
expand our research and development activities;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
expand our manufacturing capabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
acquire or license technologies; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
finance capital expenditures and our general and administrative
expenses.
|
Our present and future funding requirements will depend on many
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the progress and timing of our clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the level of research and development investment required to
maintain and improve our technology position;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patent
claims and other intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our efforts to acquire or license complementary technologies or
acquire complementary businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
changes in product development plans needed to address any
difficulties in commercialization;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
competing technological and market developments; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
changes in regulatory policies or laws that affect our
operations.
|
If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities,
dilution to our stockholders could result. Any equity securities
issued also may provide for rights, preferences or privileges
senior to those of holders of our common stock. If we raise
additional funds by issuing debt securities, these debt
securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior
to those of holders of our common stock, and the terms of the
debt securities issued could impose significant restrictions on
our operations. If we raise additional funds through
collaborations and licensing arrangements, we might be required
to relinquish significant rights to our technologies or
products, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to
us. If adequate funds are not available, we may have to scale
back our operations or limit our research and development
activities.
Delays or
adverse results in clinical trials could result in increased
costs to us and delay our ability to generate revenue.
Clinical trials can be long and expensive, and the outcome of
clinical trials is uncertain and subject to delays. It may take
several years to complete clinical trials, if at all, and a
product candidate may fail at any stage of the clinical trial
process. The length of time required varies substantially
according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of
the product candidate. Interim results of a preclinical study or
clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results, and
acceptable results in preclinical studies or early clinical
trials may not be repeatable in later subsequent clinical
trials. The commencement or completion of any of our clinical
trials may be delayed or halted for a variety of reasons,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the FDA or other regulatory authorities do not approve a
clinical trial protocol;
|
|
|
•
|
patients do not enroll in clinical trials at the rate we expect;
|
|
|
•
|
delays in reaching agreement on acceptable clinical trial
agreement terms with prospective sites;
|
|
|
•
|
delays in obtaining institutional review board approval to
conduct a study at a prospective site;
|
|
|
•
|
third party clinical investigators do not perform our clinical
trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the
clinical trial protocol and good clinical practices, or the
third party organizations do not perform data collection and
analysis in a timely or accurate manner;
|
|
|
•
|
governmental regulations or administrative actions are
changed; and
|
|
|
•
|
insufficient funds to continue our clinical trials.
|
10
We do not know whether our existing or any future clinical
trials will demonstrate safety and efficacy sufficiently to
result in additional FDA approvals. While a number of physicians
have conducted clinical studies assessing the safety and
efficacy of Microcyn for various indications, the data from
these studies is not sufficient to support approval of Microcyn
as a drug in the United States. The FDA has requested an
additional pivotal trial and microbiology and dermatology
studies before we submit an NDA for Microcyn as a pre-operative
skin preparation. We will be required to conduct additional
clinical trials prior to seeking approval of Microcyn for
additional indications. Our failure to adequately demonstrate
the safety and efficacy of our product candidates to the
satisfaction of the FDA will prevent our receipt of FDA approval
for additional indications and, ultimately, impact
commercialization of our products in the United States. If we
experience significant delays or adverse results in clinical
trials, our financial results and the commercial prospects for
products based on Microcyn will be harmed, our costs would
increase and our ability to generate revenue would be delayed.
If we
fail to obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining,
regulatory clearances to market our current or future products,
we will be unable to commercialize these products.
Developing, testing, manufacturing, marketing and selling of
medical technology products are subject to extensive regulation
by numerous governmental authorities in the United States and
other countries. The process of obtaining regulatory clearance
and approval of medical technology products is costly and time
consuming. Even though the underlying product formulation may be
the same or similar, our products are subject to different
regulations and approval processes depending upon their intended
use. In the United States, use of Microcyn to cleanse and
debride a wound comes within the medical device regulation
framework, while use of Microcyn to prepare the skin
pre-operatively and to control infection in wounds will require
us to seek FDA approval of Microcyn as a drug in the United
States.
To obtain regulatory approval of our products as drugs in the
United States, we must first show that our products are safe and
effective for target indications through preclinical studies
(animal testing) and clinical trials (human testing). The FDA
generally clears marketing of a medical device through the
510(k) pre-market clearance process if it is demonstrated that
the new product has the same intended use and is substantially
equivalent to another legally marketed device, including a
510(k)-cleared product, and otherwise meets the FDA’s
requirements. Product modifications, including labeling the
product for a new intended use, may require the submission of a
new 510(k) clearance before the modified product can be
marketed. Some higher-risk medical devices must receive
pre-market approval, or PMA, before they may be commercialized.
The PMA process is more costly, lengthy and uncertain than the
510(k) clearance process and requires the development and
submission of clinical studies supporting the safety and
effectiveness of the device. We cannot assure you that any new
products or any product enhancements we develop will be subject
to the shorter 510(k) clearance process instead of the more
lengthy PMA or drug approval processes.
We do not know whether our products based on Microcyn will
receive approval from FDA as a drug. The data from clinical
studies of Microcyn conducted by physicians to date will not
satisfy FDA’s regulatory criteria for approval of an NDA.
In connection with our efforts to commercialize Microcyn as a
pre-operative skin preparation, the FDA has requested an
additional pivotal trial and additional microbiology and
dermatology studies. Before we initiate our second pivotal
trial, we plan to discuss with the FDA its request for an
additional pivotal trial and additional data. Depending on the
results of these discussions we may reassess our priorities,
clinical timelines and schedules for filing the NDA for
pre-operative skin preparation. We will be required to conduct
additional clinical trials prior to seeking approval of Microcyn
for additional indications. We are therefore conducting, and
will need to conduct additional, well-controlled clinical trials
in order to generate data that demonstrates to the satisfaction
of FDA that Microcyn is safe and effective for the indications
we seek in our NDAs. The outcomes of clinical trials are
inherently uncertain, and there is no guarantee that the results
of our clinical trials will replicate the data obtained from the
physician clinical studies and that these clinical trials will
support FDA approval of Microcyn as a drug. In addition, we do
not know whether the necessary approvals or clearances will be
granted for future products or that FDA review or actions will
not involve delays caused by the FDA’s request for
additional information or clinical testing that could adversely
affect the time to market and sale of products as drugs. If we
do not obtain the requisite
11
regulatory clearances and approvals, we will be unable to
commercialize our products as drugs and may never recover any of
the substantial costs we have invested in the development of
Microcyn.
Distribution of our products outside the United States is
subject to extensive government regulation. These regulations,
including the requirements for approvals or clearance to market,
the time required for regulatory review and the sanctions
imposed for violations, vary from country to country. We do not
know whether we will obtain regulatory approvals in such
countries or that we will not be required to incur significant
costs in obtaining or maintaining these regulatory approvals. In
addition, the export by us of certain of our products that have
not yet been cleared for domestic commercial distribution may be
subject to FDA export restrictions. Failure to obtain necessary
regulatory approvals, the restriction, suspension or revocation
of existing approvals or any other failure to comply with
regulatory requirements would have a material adverse effect on
our future business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We may incur significant liabilities in connection with our
relationship with a former distributor in Mexico, and our
results of operations may be negatively affected by the
termination of this relationship.
On June 16, 2005, we entered into a series of agreements
with Quimica Pasteur, or QP, a Mexico-based distributor of
pharmaceutical products to hospitals and health care entities
owned or operated by the Mexican Ministry of Health, or MOH.
These agreements provided, among other things, for QP to act as
our exclusive distributor of Microcyn to the MOH for a period of
three years. In connection with these agreements, an individual
designated by us who is also one of our executive officers,
concurrently acquired, in his individual capacity, a small
equity interest in QP. We were granted an option to acquire the
remaining equity of QP directly from its principals. In
addition, two of our employees were appointed as officers of QP,
which resulted in the establishment of financial control of QP
by our company under applicable accounting literature.
As a result of our agreements, we were required to consolidate
QP’s operations with our financial results. In connection
with our audit of QP’s financial statements in late 2005,
we were made aware of a number of facts that suggested that QP
or its principals may have engaged in some form of tax avoidance
practice prior to the execution of the agreements between our
company and QP. We did not discover these facts prior to our
execution of these agreements or for several months thereafter.
Our prior independent auditors informed us that we did not have
effective anti-fraud programs designed to detect the type of
activities in which QP’s principals engaged or the
personnel to effectively evaluate and determine the appropriate
accounting for non-routine or complex accounting transactions.
Our audit committee engaged an outside law firm to conduct an
investigation whose findings implicated QP’s principals in
a systemic tax avoidance practice prior to June 16, 2005.
We estimate that taxes, interest and penalties related to these
practices could amount to $7 million or more. Based on the
results of this investigation, we terminated our agreements with
QP effective March 26, 2006.
Although we do not believe that we are responsible for any tax
avoidance practices of QP’s principals prior to
June 16, 2005, the Mexican taxing authority could make a
claim against us or our Mexican subsidiary. We have been
informed by counsel in Mexico that the statute of limitations,
including for actions for fraud, is five years from the date of
our last tax return, which was March 31, 2006.
QP had a well-established relationship with the MOH. We lost the
benefit of this relationship when we terminated our agreements
with QP. Although we currently market Microcyn in Mexico through
a dedicated contract sales force and continue to market Microcyn
to the MOH, we do not know whether our future sales in Mexico
will decline as a result of the termination of our relationship
with QP.
12
Our former independent registered public accounting firm has
notified us of a number of reportable events constituting a
material weakness over financial reporting which, if not
successfully remedied, may among other things, impact our
ability to develop reliable financial statements and comply with
our reporting obligations as a public company.
In August 2006, our former independent registered public
accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PWC, notified
us of a number of deficiencies it believes comprise reportable
events that may, among other things, impact our ability to
develop reliable financial statements. In its letter, PWC stated
that it had advised our audit committee of the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the absence of financial accounting personnel with sufficient
skills and experience to effectively evaluate and determine the
appropriate accounting for non-routine
and/or
complex accounting transactions consistent with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, which
resulted in a number of material audit adjustments to the
financial statements during the course of audit procedures;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the failure to maintain effective controls to ensure the
identification of accounting issues related to and the proper
accounting for stock options with the right of rescission that
were granted under certain stock option plans that required
registration or qualification under federal and state securities
laws primarily due to insufficient oversight and lack of
personnel in the accounting and finance organization with the
appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and
training;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the failure to maintain an effective anti-fraud program designed
to detect and prevent fraudulent activities in QP;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the need to expand significantly the scope of the audit of QP to
assess the impact of identified fraudulent activities on our
financial statements, in which regard PWC advised our audit
committee that the results of the fraud investigation may cause
PWC to be unwilling to be associated with our financial
statements;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the “tone at the top” set by our senior management
does not appear to encourage an attitude within our company that
controls are important or that established controls cannot be
circumvented;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we did not have the appropriate financial management and
reporting infrastructure in place to meet the demands that will
be placed upon us as a public company, including the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that we will
be unable to report our financial results accurately or in a
timely manner; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
significant control deficiencies, when considered in the
aggregate, constituted a material weakness over financial
reporting.
|
We have filed a copy of the letter from PWC as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
For additional information, please see “Change in
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
We may agree to change the brand name of our product in
Mexico, which may result in the loss of any brand recognition
that we have established with users of our products.
We have marketed our products in Mexico under the brand name of
Microcyn60. In accordance with the proposed settlement of a
trademark confusion lawsuit filed against us in Mexico, we may
agree to stop using the name Microcyn60 in Mexico. As a result,
we may lose the benefit of the brand name recognition we have
generated in the region and our product sales in Mexico could
decline. In locations where we have distributed our products, we
believe that the brand names of those products have developed
name recognition among consumers who purchase them. Any change
to the brand name of our other products may cause us to lose
such name recognition, which may lead to confusion in the
marketplace and a decline in sales of our products.
13
If our
competitors develop products similar to Microcyn, we may need to
modify or alter our business strategy, which may delay the
achievement of our goals.
Competitors may develop products with similar characteristics as
Microcyn. Such similar products marketed by larger competitors
can hinder our efforts to penetrate the market. As a result, we
may be forced to modify or alter our business and regulatory
strategy and sales and marketing plans, as a response to changes
in the market, competition and technology limitations, among
others. Such modifications may pose additional delays in
achieving our goals.
If we are
unable to expand our direct domestic sales force, we may not be
able to successfully sell our products in the United
States.
We currently sell Microcyn in the United States through a
network of one national and five regional distributors and our
medicial and clinical employees. We plan to sell directly into
the United States markets and we plan to expand our
domestic sales force in connection with our anticipated receipt
of FDA approval to market and sell Microcyn as a drug for
pre-operative skin preparation. Developing a sales force is
expensive and time consuming, and the lack of qualified sales
personnel could delay or limit the success of our product
launch. Our domestic sales force, if established, will be
competing with the sales operations of our competitors, which
are better funded and more experienced. We may not be able to
develop domestic sales capacity on a timely basis or at all.
Our
dependence on distributors for sales could limit or prevent us
from selling our products and from realizing long-term revenue
growth.
We currently depend on distributors to sell Microcyn in the
United States, Europe and other countries and intend to continue
to sell our products primarily through distributors in Europe
and the United States for the foreseeable future. In addition,
if we are unable to expand our direct sales force, we will
continue to rely on distributors to sell Microcyn. Our existing
distribution agreements are generally short-term in duration,
and we may need to pursue alternate distributors if the other
parties to these agreements terminate or elect not to renew
their agreements. If we are unable to retain our current
distributors for any reason, we must replace them with
alternative distributors experienced in supplying the wound care
market, which could be time-consuming and divert
management’s attention from other operational matters. In
addition, we will need to attract additional distributors to
expand the geographic areas in which we sell Microcyn.
Distributors may not commit the necessary resources to market
and sell our products to the level of our expectations, which
could harm our ability to generate revenues. In addition, some
of our distributors may also sell products that compete with
ours. If current or future distributors do not perform
adequately, or we are unable to locate distributors in
particular geographic areas, we may not realize long-term
revenue growth.
We depend
on a contract sales force to sell our products in
Mexico.
We currently depend on a contract sales force to sell Microcyn
in Mexico. Our existing agreement is short-term in duration and
can be terminated by either party upon 30 days written
notice. If we are unable to retain our current agreement for any
reason, we may need to build our own internal sales force or
find an alternate source for contract sales people. We may be
unable to find an alternate source, or the alternate
source’s sales force may not generate sufficient revenue.
If our current or future contract sales force does not perform
adequately, we may not realize long-term revenue growth in
Mexico.
We intend to license or collaborate with third parties in
various potential markets, and events involving these strategic
partners or any future collaborations could delay or prevent us
from developing or commercializing products.
Our business strategy and our short- and long-term operating
results will depend in part on our ability to execute on
existing strategic collaborations and to license or partner with
new strategic partners. We believe collaborations allow us to
leverage our resources and technologies and to access markets
that are compatible with our own core areas of expertise while
avoiding the cost of establishing a direct sales force in each
market. To penetrate our target markets, we may need to enter
into additional collaborative agreements to assist in the
14
development and commercialization of future products. For
example, depending upon our analysis of the time and expense
involved in obtaining FDA approval to sell a product to treat
open wounds, we may chose to license our technology to a third
party as opposed to pursuing commercialization ourselves.
Establishing strategic collaborations is difficult and
time-consuming. Potential collaborators may reject
collaborations based upon their assessment of our financial,
regulatory or intellectual property position and our internal
capabilities. Our discussions with potential collaborators may
not lead to the establishment of new collaborations on favorable
terms. We have limited control over the amount and timing of
resources that our current collaborators or any future
collaborators devote to our collaborations or potential
products. These collaborators may breach or terminate their
agreements with us or otherwise fail to conduct their
collaborative activities successfully and in a timely manner.
Further, our collaborators may not develop or commercialize
products that arise out of our collaborative arrangements or
devote sufficient resources to the development, manufacture,
marketing or sale of these products. By entering into a
collaboration, we may preclude opportunities to collaborate with
other third parties who do not wish to associate with our
existing third party strategic partners. Moreover, in the event
of termination of a collaboration agreement, termination
negotiations may result in less favorable terms.
If we
fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we
experience unanticipated problems with our products, these
products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the
market.
Regulatory approvals or clearances that we currently have and
that we may receive in the future are subject to limitations on
the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed, and
any future approvals could contain requirements for potentially
costly post-marketing
follow-up
studies. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials or
activities constitute promotion of an unapproved use or we
otherwise fail to comply with FDA regulations, we may be subject
to regulatory enforcement actions, including a warning letter,
injunction, seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties. In
addition, the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, adverse event
reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, distribution and
record-keeping for approved products are subject to extensive
regulation. Our manufacturing facilities, processes and
specifications are subject to periodic inspection by FDA,
European and other regulatory authorities and from time to time,
we may receive notices of deficiencies from these agencies as a
result of such inspections. Our failure to continue to meet
regulatory standards or to remedy any deficiencies could result
in restrictions being imposed on products or manufacturing
processes, fines, suspension or loss of regulatory approvals or
clearances, product recalls, termination of distribution or
product seizures or the need to invest substantial resources to
comply with various existing and new requirements. In the more
egregious cases, criminal sanctions, civil penalties,
disgorgement of profits or closure of our manufacturing
facilities are possible. The subsequent discovery of previously
unknown problems with Microcyn, including adverse events of
unanticipated severity or frequency, may result in restrictions
on the marketing of our products, and could include voluntary or
mandatory recall or withdrawal of products from the market.
New government regulations may be enacted and changes in FDA
policies and regulations, their interpretation and enforcement,
could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products. We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse
government regulation that may arise from future legislation or
administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.
Therefore, we do not know whether we will be able to continue to
comply with any regulations or that the costs of such compliance
will not have a material adverse effect on our future business,
financial condition, and results of operations. If we are not
able to maintain regulatory compliance, we will not be permitted
to market our products and our business would suffer.
We may
experience difficulties in manufacturing Microcyn, which could
prevent us from commercializing one or more of our
products.
The machines used to manufacture our Microcyn-based products are
complex, use complicated software and must be monitored by
highly trained engineers. Slight deviations anywhere in our
manufacturing process, including quality control, labeling and
packaging, could lead to a failure to meet the specifications
required by the FDA, EPA, European notified bodies and Mexican
regulatory agencies, which may result in lot failures or product
recalls. In August 2006, we received a “show cause”
letter form the EPA, which stated that, in tests conducted by
the EPA, Cidalcyn was found to be ineffective in killing
specified pathogens when used
15
according to label directions. We have begun gathering records
for review to determine if there might have been any problems in
production of the lot tested by the EPA. We have also
quarantined all remaining quantities of the production lot in
question. If we are unable to obtain quality internal and
external components, mechanical and electrical parts, if our
software contains defects or is corrupted, or if we are unable
to attract and retain qualified technicians to manufacture our
products, our manufacturing output of Microcyn, or any other
product candidate based on our platform that we may develop,
could fail to meet required standards, our regulatory approvals
could be delayed, denied or revoked, and commercialization of
one or more of our Microcyn-based products may be delayed or
foregone. Manufacturing processes that are used to produce the
smaller quantities of Microcyn needed for our clinical test and
current commercial sales may not be successfully scaled up to
allow production of significant commercial quantities. Any
failure to manufacture our products to required standards on a
commercial scale could result in reduced revenues, delays in
generating revenue and increased costs.
Our
competitive position depends on our ability to protect our
intellectual property and our proprietary
technologies.
Our ability to compete and to achieve and maintain profitability
depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property and
proprietary technologies. We currently rely on a combination of
patents, patent applications, trademarks, trade secret laws,
confidentiality agreements, license agreements and invention
assignment agreements to protect our intellectual property
rights. We also rely upon unpatented know-how and continuing
technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive
position. These measures may not be adequate to safeguard our
Microcyn technology. In addition, we granted a security interest
in our assets under a loan and security agreement. The security
interest extends to our intellectual property in the event we
fail to maintain specified cash reserves under the loan. If we
do not protect our rights adequately, third parties could use
our technology, and our ability to compete in the market would
be reduced.
Although we have filed U.S. and foreign patent applications
related to our Microcyn based products, the manufacturing
technology for making the products, and their uses, only one
patent has been issued from these applications to date.
Our pending patent applications and any patent applications we
may file in the future may not result in issued patents, and we
do not know whether any of our in-licensed patents or any
additional patents that might ultimately be issued by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will protect our Microcyn
technology. Any claims that issue may not be sufficiently broad
to prevent third parties from producing competing substitutes
and may be infringed, designed around, or invalidated by third
parties. Even issued patents may later be found to be invalid,
or may be modified or revoked in proceedings instituted by third
parties before various patent offices or in courts.
The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is
more uncertain in part because legal means afford only limited
protection and may not adequately protect our rights, and we
will not be able to ensure that:
|
|
|
|
•
|
we were the first to invent the inventions described in patent
applications;
|
|
|
•
|
we were the first to file patent applications for inventions;
|
|
|
•
|
others will not independently develop similar or alternative
technologies or duplicate our products without infringing our
intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
•
|
any patents licensed or issued to us will provide us with any
competitive advantages;
|
|
|
•
|
we will develop proprietary technologies that are
patentable; or
|
|
|
•
|
the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on our
ability to do business.
|
The policies we use to protect our trade secrets may not be
effective in preventing misappropriation of our trade secrets by
others. In addition, confidentiality and invention assignment
agreements executed by our employees, consultants and advisors
may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection
for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the
event of unauthorized use or disclosures. We cannot be
16
certain that the steps we have taken will prevent the
misappropriation and use of our intellectual property,
particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect
our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. For
example, one of our former contract partners, Nofil Corporation,
whom we relied upon to manufacture our proprietary machines had
access to our proprietary information and we believe undertook
the development and manufacture of the machines to be sold to
third parties in violation of our agreement with such company.
We have brought a claim against Nofil in the Northern District
of California. We believe that a former officer of our Mexico
subsidiary collaborated in these acts, misappropriated our trade
secrets, and is currently selling products in Mexico that are
competitive with our products. In addition, we believe that,
through the licensor of the patents that we in-license and who
has also assigned patents to us, a company in Japan obtained one
of our patent applications, translated it into Hangul and filed
it under such company’s and the licensor’s name in
South Korea. These and any other leak of confidential data into
the public domain or to third parties could allow our
competitors to learn our trade secrets.
We are in
a dispute with the licensor of all of our current issued
patents, which could result in our losing all rights under such
patents
and
have a material adverse impact on our business opportunities in
Japan.
In March 2003, we obtained an exclusive license to six issued
Japanese patents and five Japanese published pending patent
applications owned by Coherent Technologies. The issued Japanese
patents and pending Japanese patent applications relate to an
early generation of super-oxidized water product and aspects of
the method and apparatus for producing such product and will
expire between 2011 and 2014. In June 2006, we received written
notice from Coherent advising us that the patent license was
terminated, citing various reasons with which we disagree.
Although we do not believe Coherent has grounds to terminate the
license, we may have to take legal action to preserve our rights
under the license and to enjoin Coherent from breaching its
terms. We do not know whether we would prevail in any such
action, which would be costly and time consuming, and we could
lose our rights under the license, which could have a material
adverse impact on our business opportunities in Japan. In
addition, we could have to defend ourselves against infringement
claims from Coherent in Japan based on their position on
termination of the license.
We may
face intellectual property infringement claims that could be
time-consuming, costly to defend and could result in our loss of
significant rights and the assessment of treble
damages.
From time to time, we may receive notices of claims of
infringement, misappropriation or misuse of other parties’
proprietary rights. In September 2005, a complaint was filed
against us in Mexico claiming confusion in trademarks with
respect to our Microcyn60 mark. In May 2006, a second unrelated
complaint was filed against us in Mexico claiming confusion in
trademarks with respect to our Microcyn60 mark. We may agree to
cease marketing our product in Mexico under the name Microcyn60
as a result of the proposed settlement of the initial lawsuit.
We could incur a liability of approximately $100,000 for the use
of the name Microcyn60 during the twelve month period following
the date of settlement. We cannot be sure that we will not be
required to take additional actions, including making additional
payments related to this matter, or that changing our product
name will not have a negative impact on our product sales in
Mexico.
In addition, we may have disputes regarding intellectual
property rights with the parties that have licensed those rights
to us. Some claims received from third parties may lead to
litigation. We cannot assure you that we will prevail in these
actions, or that other actions alleging misappropriation or
misuse by us of third-party trade secrets, infringement by us of
third-party patents and trademarks or the validity of our
patents, will not be asserted or prosecuted against us. We may
also initiate claims to defend our intellectual property.
Intellectual property litigation, regardless of outcome, is
expensive and time-consuming, could divert management’s
attention from our business and have a material negative effect
on our business, operating results or financial condition. If
there is a successful claim of infringement against us, we may
be required to pay substantial damages (including treble damages
if we were to be found to have willfully infringed a third
party’s patent) to the party claiming infringement, develop
non-infringing technology, stop selling our products or using
technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual
property or enter into royalty or license agreements that may
not be available on acceptable or commercially practical terms,
if at all. Our failure to develop non-infringing technologies or
license the proprietary rights on a timely basis could harm our
business. In addition, modifying our products to include
17
the non-infringing technologies could require us to seek
re-approval or clearance from various regulatory bodies for our
products, which would be costly and time consuming. Also, we may
be unaware of pending patent applications that relate to our
technology. Parties making infringement claims on future issued
patents may be able to obtain an injunction that would prevent
us from selling our products or using technology that contains
the allegedly infringing intellectual property, which could harm
our business.
Our
ability to generate revenue will be diminished if we are unable
to obtain acceptable prices or an adequate level of
reimbursement from third-party payors of healthcare
costs.
The continuing efforts of governmental and other third-party
payors, including managed care organizations such as health
maintenance organizations, or HMOs, to contain or reduce costs
of health care may affect our future revenue and profitability,
and the future revenue and profitability of our potential
customers, suppliers and collaborative or license partners and
the availability of capital. For example, in certain foreign
markets, pricing or profitability of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to government control. In the United
States, governmental and private payors have limited the growth
of health care costs through price regulation or controls,
competitive pricing programs and drug rebate programs. Our
ability to commercialize our products successfully will depend
in part on the extent to which appropriate coverage and
reimbursement levels for the cost of our Microcyn products and
related treatment are obtained from governmental authorities,
private health insurers and other organizations, such as HMOs.
There is significant uncertainty concerning third-party coverage
and reimbursement of newly approved medical products and drugs.
Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices
charged for medical products and services. Also, the trend
toward managed healthcare in the United States and the
concurrent growth of organizations such as HMOs, as well as
legislative proposals to reform healthcare or reduce government
insurance programs, may result in lower prices for or rejection
of our products. The cost containment measures that health care
payors and providers are instituting and the effect of any
health care reform could materially and adversely affect our
ability to generate revenues.
In addition, given ongoing federal and state government
initiatives directed at lowering the total cost of health care,
the United States Congress and state legislatures will
likely continue to focus on health care reform, the cost of
prescription pharmaceuticals and the reform of the Medicare and
Medicaid payment systems. While we cannot predict whether any
proposed cost-containment measures will be adopted, the
announcement or adoption of these proposals could reduce the
price that we receive for our Microcyn products in the future.
We could
be required to indemnify third parties for alleged infringement,
which could cause us to incur significant costs.
Some of our distribution agreements contain commitments to
indemnify our distributors against liability arising from
infringement of third party intellectual property such as
patents. We may be required to indemnify our customers for
claims made against them or license fees they are required to
pay. If we are forced to indemnify for claims or to pay license
fees, our business and financial condition could be
substantially harmed.
A
significant part of our business is conducted outside of the
United States, exposing us to additional risks that may not
exist in the United States, which in turn could cause our
business and operating results to suffer.
We have international operations in Mexico and Europe. For the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the
three months ended June 30, 2006, approximately 10%, 35%,
75% and 81%, respectively, of our total revenue was generated
from sales outside of the United States. Our business is highly
regulated for the use, marketing and manufacturing of our
Microcyn products both domestically and internationally. Our
international operations are subject to risks, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
local political or economic instability;
|
|
|
•
|
changes in governmental regulation;
|
18
|
|
|
|
•
|
changes in import/export duties;
|
|
|
•
|
trade restrictions;
|
|
|
•
|
lack of experience in foreign markets;
|
|
|
•
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing operations in
certain foreign countries;
|
|
|
•
|
work stoppages or other changes in labor conditions;
|
|
|
•
|
difficulties in collecting accounts receivables on a timely
basis or at all; and
|
|
|
•
|
adverse tax consequences or overlapping tax structures.
|
We plan to continue to expand internationally to respond to
customer requirements and market opportunities. We currently
have international manufacturing facilities in Mexico and The
Netherlands. Establishing operations in any foreign country or
region presents risks such as those described above as well as
risks specific to the particular country or region. In addition,
until a payment history is established over time with customers
in a new geography or region, the likelihood of collecting
receivables generated by such operations could be less than our
expectations. As a result, there is a greater risk that reserves
set with respect to the collection of such receivables may be
inadequate. If our international expansion efforts in any
foreign country are unsuccessful, we could incur significant
losses and we may not achieve profitability.
In addition, changes in policies or laws of the United States or
foreign governments resulting in, among other things, changes in
regulations and the approval process, higher taxation, currency
conversion limitations, restrictions on fund transfers or the
expropriation of private enterprises, could reduce the
anticipated benefits of our international expansion. If we fail
to realize the anticipated revenue growth of our future
international operations, our business and operating results
could suffer.
Our sales
in international markets subject us to foreign currency exchange
and other risks and costs which could harm our
business.
A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from outside
the United States, primarily from Mexico. We anticipate that
revenues from international customers will continue to represent
a substantial portion of our revenues for the foreseeable
future. Because we generate revenues in foreign currencies, we
are subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations. We
incurred foreign currency exchange losses of $4,000, $283,000
and $272,000 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004 and
2006 and the three months ended June 30, 2006,
respectively, and a gain of $134,000 for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005. The functional currency of our Mexican
subsidiary is the Mexican Peso, and the functional currency of
our subsidiary in The Netherlands is the Euro. For the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements, the
financial results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated
into U.S. dollars on average exchange rates during the
applicable period. If the U.S. dollar appreciates against
the Mexican Peso or the Euro, as applicable, the revenues we
recognize from sales by our subsidiaries will be adversely
impacted. Foreign exchange gains or losses as a result of
exchange rate fluctuations in any given period could harm our
operating results and negatively impact our revenues.
Additionally, if the effective price of our products were to
increase as a result of fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, demand for our products could decline and
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
The loss
of key members of our senior management team, one of our
directors or our inability to retain highly skilled scientists,
technicians and salespeople could adversely affect our
business.
Our success depends largely on the skills, experience and
performance of key members of our executive management team,
including Hojabr Alimi, our Chief Executive Officer, and Akihisa
Akao, a member of our Board of Directors and one of our
consultants. The efforts of these people will be critical to us
as we continue to develop our products and attempt to
commercialize products in the chronic and acute wound care
market. If we were to lose one or more of these individuals, we
may experience difficulties in competing effectively, developing
our technologies and implementing our business strategies.
19
Our research and development programs depend on our ability to
attract and retain highly skilled scientists and technicians. We
may not be able to attract or retain qualified scientists and
technicians in the future due to the intense competition for
qualified personnel among medical technology businesses,
particularly in the San Francisco Bay Area. We also face
competition from universities and public and private research
institutions in recruiting and retaining highly qualified
personnel. In addition, our success depends on our ability to
attract and retain salespeople with extensive experience in
wound care and close relationships with the medical community,
including physicians and other medical staff. We may have
difficulties locating, recruiting or retaining qualified
salespeople, which could cause a delay or decline in the rate of
adoption of our products. If we are not able to attract and
retain the necessary personnel to accomplish our business
objectives, we may experience constraints that will adversely
affect our ability to support our research, development and
sales programs.
We maintain key-person life insurance only on Mr. Alimi. We
may discontinue this insurance in the future, it may not
continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or, if
continued, it may prove inadequate to compensate us for the loss
of Mr. Alimi’s services.
We may be
unable to manage our future growth effectively, which would make
it difficult to execute our business strategy.
We may experience periods of rapid growth as we expand our
business, which will likely place a significant strain on our
limited personnel and other resources. Any failure by us to
manage our growth effectively could have an adverse effect on
our ability to achieve our commercialization goals.
Furthermore, we conduct business in a number of geographic
regions and are seeking to expand to other regions. We have not
established a physical presence in many of the international
regions in which we conduct or plan to conduct business, but
rather we manage our business from our headquarters in Northern
California. As a result, we conduct business at all times of the
day and night with limited personnel. If we fail to
appropriately target and increase our presence in these
geographic regions, we may not be able to effectively market and
sell our Microcyn products in these locations or we may not meet
our customers’ needs in a timely manner, which could
negatively affect our operating results.
Future growth will also impose significant added
responsibilities on management, including the need to identify,
recruit, train and integrate additional employees. In addition,
rapid and significant growth will place strain on our
administrative and operational infrastructure, including sales
and marketing and clinical and regulatory personnel. Our ability
to manage our operations and growth will require us to continue
to improve our operational, financial and management controls,
reporting systems and procedures. If we are unable to manage our
growth effectively, it may be difficult for us to execute our
business strategy.
The wound
care industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid
technological change. If our competitors are better able to
develop and market products that are less expensive or more
effective than any products that we may develop, our commercial
opportunity will be reduced or eliminated.
The wound care industry is highly competitive and subject to
rapid technological change. Our success depends, in part, upon
our ability to stay at the forefront of technological change and
maintain a competitive position.
We compete with large healthcare, pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, along with smaller or early-stage
companies that have collaborative arrangements with larger
pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government
agencies and other public and private research organizations.
Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development,
manufacturing, pre-clinical testing, conducting clinical trials,
obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products
than we do. Our competitors may:
|
|
|
|
•
|
develop and patent processes or products earlier than we will;
|
|
|
•
|
develop and commercialize products that are less expensive or
more efficient than any products that we may develop;
|
20
|
|
|
|
•
|
obtain regulatory approvals for competing products more rapidly
than we will;
|
|
|
•
|
improve upon existing technological approaches or develop new or
different approaches that render our technology or products
obsolete or non-competitive.
|
As a result, we may not be able to successfully commercialize
any future products.
The
success of our research and development efforts may depend on
our ability to find suitable collaborators to fully exploit our
capabilities. If we are unable to establish collaborations or if
these future collaborations are unsuccessful, our research and
development efforts may be unsuccessful, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
An important element of our business strategy will be to enter
into collaborative or license arrangements under which we
license our Microcyn technology to other parties for development
and commercialization. We expect that while we may initially
seek to conduct initial clinical trials on our drug candidates,
we may need to seek collaborators for a number of our potential
products because of the expense, effort and expertise required
to continue additional clinical trials and further develop those
potential products candidates. Because collaboration
arrangements are complex to negotiate, we may not be successful
in our attempts to establish these arrangements. Also, we may
not have products that are desirable to other parties, or we may
be unwilling to license a potential product because the party
interested in it is a competitor. The terms of any arrangements
that we establish may not be favorable to us. Alternatively,
potential collaborators may decide against entering into an
agreement with us because of our financial, regulatory or
intellectual property position or for scientific, commercial or
other reasons. If we are not able to establish collaborative
agreements, we may not be able to develop and commercialize new
products, which would adversely affect our business and our
revenues.
In order for any of these collaboration or license arrangements
to be successful, we must first identify potential collaborators
or licensees whose capabilities complement and integrate well
with ours. We may rely on these arrangements for, not only
financial resources, but also for expertise or economies of
scale that we expect to need in the future relating to clinical
trials, manufacturing, sales and marketing, and for licenses to
technology rights. However, it is likely that we will not be
able to control the amount and timing of resources that our
collaborators or licensees devote to our programs or potential
products. If our collaborators or licensees prove difficult to
work with, are less skilled than we originally expected, or do
not devote adequate resources to the program, the relationship
will not be successful. If a business combination, involving a
collaborator or licensees and a third party were to occur, the
effect could be to diminish, terminate or cause delays in
development of a potential product.
We may
acquire other businesses or form joint ventures that could harm
our operating results, dilute your ownership of us, increase our
debt or cause us to incur significant expense.
As part of our business strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of
complementary businesses and assets, as well as technology
licensing arrangements. We also intend to pursue strategic
alliances that leverage our core technology and industry
experience to expand our product offerings or distribution. We
have no experience with respect to acquiring other companies and
limited experience with respect to the formation of
collaborations, strategic alliances and joint ventures. If we
make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these
acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we
could assume unknown or contingent liabilities. Any future
acquisitions by us also could result in significant write-offs
or the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, any of
which could harm our operating results. Integration of an
acquired company also may require management resources that
otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our
existing business. We may not identify or complete these
transactions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or
at all, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any
acquisition, technology license, strategic alliance or joint
venture.
To finance any acquisitions, we may choose to issue shares of
our common stock as consideration, which would dilute your
ownership interest in us. If the price of our common stock is
low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other companies
for stock. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise
additional funds for acquisitions through public or private
financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that
are favorable to us, or at all.
21
If we are
unable to comply with broad and complex federal and state fraud
and abuse laws, we could face substantial penalties and our
products could be excluded from government healthcare
programs.
We are subject to various federal and state laws pertaining to
healthcare fraud and abuse, which, among other things, prohibit
payments to induce the referral of products and services and the
fraudulent billing of federal healthcare programs. If there is a
change in law, regulation or administrative or judicial
interpretations of these laws, we may have to change our
business practices or our existing business practices could be
challenged as unlawful, which could have a negative effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our past or present operations are found to be in violation
of these laws or other similar governmental regulations to which
we or our customers are subject, we may be subject to penalties,
which may include:
|
|
|
|
•
|
criminal and civil sanctions;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare
programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans
Administration healthcare programs; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.
|
Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex and even minor,
inadvertent irregularities can potentially give rise to claims
that a statute or regulation has been violated.
The frequency of suits to enforce these laws have increased
significantly in recent years and have increased the risk that a
healthcare company will have to defend a false claim action, pay
fines or be excluded from the Medicare, Medicaid or other
federal and state healthcare programs as a result of an
investigation arising out of such action. We cannot assure you
that we will not become subject to such litigation. Any
violations of these laws, or any action against us for violation
of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could
harm our reputation, be costly to defend and divert
management’s attention from other aspects of our business.
Similarly, if the physicians or other providers or entities with
whom we do business are found to have violated abuse laws, they
may be subject to sanctions, which could also have a negative
impact on us.
Our
efforts to discover and develop potential products may not lead
to the discovery, development, commercialization or marketing of
actual drug products.
We are currently engaged in a number of different approaches to
discover and develop new product applications and product
candidates. At the present time, we have one Microcyn-based drug
candidate in clinical trials. We also have a non-Microcyn based
compound in the research and development phase. This compound
has potential applications in oncology. Discovery and
development of potential drug candidates are expensive and
time-consuming, and we do not know if our efforts will lead to
discovery of any drug candidates that can be successfully
developed and marketed. If our efforts do not lead to the
discovery of a suitable drug candidate, we may be unable to grow
our clinical pipeline or we may be unable to enter into
agreements with collaborators who are willing to develop our
drug candidates.
We must
implement additional and expensive finance and accounting
systems, procedures and controls as we grow our business and
organization and to satisfy new reporting requirements, which
will increase our costs and require additional management
resources.
As a public reporting company, we will be required to comply
with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
expanded disclosures and accelerated reporting requirements and
more complex accounting rules. Compliance with Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other requirements will increase
our costs and require additional management resources. In a
letter following their dismissal, our prior independent auditors
informed us that we did not have the appropriate financial
management and reporting structure in place to meet the demands
of a public company and
22
that our accounting and financial personnel lacked the
appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and
training. We recently have been upgrading our finance and
accounting systems, procedures and controls and will need to
continue to implement additional finance and accounting systems,
procedures and controls as we grow our business and
organization, enter into complex business transactions and take
actions designed to satisfy new reporting requirements.
Specifically, our experience with QP indicated that we need to
better plan for complex transactions and the application of
complex accounting principles relating to those transactions. If
we are unable to complete the required Section 404
assessment as to the adequacy of our internal control over
financial reporting, if we fail to maintain or implement
adequate controls, or if our independent registered public
accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified
report as to the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of the date of our first Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for which compliance is required and thereafter, our ability to
obtain additional financing could be impaired. In addition,
investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our
internal control over financial reporting and in the accuracy of
our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act. A lack of
investor confidence in the reliability and accuracy of our
public reporting could cause our stock price to decline.
We may
not be able to maintain sufficient product liability insurance
to cover claims against us.
Product liability insurance for the healthcare industry is
generally expensive to the extent it is available at all. We may
not be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms or be
able to secure increased coverage if the commercialization of
our products progresses, nor can we be sure that existing or
future claims against us will be covered by our product
liability insurance. Moreover, the existing coverage of our
insurance policy or any rights of indemnification and
contribution that we may have may not be sufficient to offset
existing or future claims. A successful claim against us with
respect to uninsured liabilities or in excess of insurance
coverage and not subject to any indemnification or contribution
could have a material adverse effect on our future business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
Purchasers
in this offering will experience immediate and substantial
dilution in the book value of their investment.
The initial public offering price of our common stock is
substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share
of our common stock immediately after this offering. Therefore,
if you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will
incur an immediate dilution of $
in net tangible book value per share from the price you paid,
based on the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share. The exercise of
outstanding options will result in further dilution of your
investment. For additional information, please see
“Dilution.”
Our
operating results may fluctuate, which could cause our stock
price to decrease.
Fluctuations in our operating results may lead to fluctuations,
including declines, in our share price. Our operating results
and our share price may fluctuate from period to period due to a
variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
demand by physicians, other medical staff and patients for our
Microcyn products;
|
|
|
•
|
reimbursement decisions by third-party payors and announcements
of those decisions;
|
|
|
•
|
clinical trial results and publication of results in
peer-reviewed journals or the presentation at medical
conferences;
|
|
|
•
|
the inclusion or exclusion of our Microcyn products in large
clinical trials conducted by others;
|
|
|
•
|
actual and anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial
and operating results;
|
|
|
•
|
developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or
other proprietary rights;
|
|
|
•
|
issues in manufacturing our product candidates or products;
|
|
|
•
|
new or less expensive products and services or new technology
introduced or offered by our competitors or us;
|
23
|
|
|
|
•
|
the development and commercialization of product enhancements;
|
|
|
•
|
changes in the regulatory environment;
|
|
|
•
|
delays in establishing new strategic relationships;
|
|
|
•
|
introduction of technological innovations or new commercial
products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
•
|
litigation or public concern about the safety of our product
candidates or products;
|
|
|
•
|
changes in recommendations of securities analysts or lack of
analyst coverage;
|
|
|
•
|
failure to meet analyst expectations regarding our operating
results;
|
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of key personnel; and
|
|
|
•
|
general market conditions.
|
Variations in the timing of our future revenues and expenses
could also cause significant fluctuations in our operating
results from period to period and may result in unanticipated
earning shortfalls or losses. In addition, the Nasdaq Global
Market in general, and the market for life sciences companies in
particular, have experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate
to the operating performance of those companies.
If an
active, liquid trading market for our common stock does not
develop, you may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at
or above the initial offering price.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. An active and liquid trading market for our
common stock may not develop or be sustained following this
offering. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at
or above the initial offering price if trading in our stock is
not active. The initial public offering price may not be
indicative of prices that will prevail in the trading market.
See “Underwriting” for more information regarding the
factors that will be considered in determining the initial
public offering price.
Future
sales of shares by our stockholders could cause the market price
of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business
is doing well.
After this offering, we will
have
outstanding shares of common stock based on the number of shares
outstanding
at ,
2006. This includes
the shares
we are selling in this offering, which (other than shares
purchased by our affiliates) may be resold in the public market
immediately. The remaining shares will become available for
resale in the public market as shown in the chart below.
|
|
|
Number of Restricted Shares and
% of
|
|
|
Total Outstanding Following Offering
|
|
Date Available for Sale Into Public Market
|
|
1,066,400 shares,
or %
|
|
Immediately
|
1 share,
or %
|
|
90 days after the date of
this prospectus
|
26,145,765 shares,
or %
|
|
Immediately upon expiration of the
180-day
lock
up agreement
|
5,951,636 shares,
or %
|
|
At some point after the expiration
of the
180-day
lock
up agreement
|
We do not
expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result,
you must rely on stock appreciation for any return on your
investment.
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock
in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends will
also depend on our financial condition, results of operations,
capital requirements and other factors and will be at the
discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, you will have
to rely on appreciation in the price of our common stock, if
any, to earn a return on your investment in our common stock.
Furthermore, we may in the future become subject to contractual
restrictions on, or prohibitions against, the payment of
dividends.
24
We may
allocate net proceeds from this offering in ways with which you
may not agree.
Our management will have broad discretion in using the proceeds
from this offering and may use the proceeds in ways with which
you may disagree. Because we are not required to allocate the
net proceeds from this offering to any specific investment or
transaction, you cannot determine at this time the value or
propriety of our application of the proceeds. Moreover, you will
not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial or
other information on which we base our decisions on how to use
our proceeds. We may use the proceeds for corporate purposes
that do not immediately enhance our prospects for the future or
increase the value of your investment. As a result, you and
other stockholders may not agree with our decisions.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter, by-laws and Delaware law may make it
difficult for you to change our management and may also make a
takeover difficult.
Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that
limit the ability of stockholders to change our management and
may also enable our management to resist a takeover. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the establishment of a classified board of directors requiring
that not all directors be elected at one time;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of our board of directors to issue and designate the
rights of, without stockholder approval, up to
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, which rights could be
senior to those of common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
limitations on persons authorized to call a special meeting of
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
advance notice procedures required for stockholders to make
nominations of candidates for election as directors or to bring
matters before an annual meeting of stockholders.
|
These provisions might discourage, delay or prevent a change of
control or in our management. These provisions could also
discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and
other stockholders to elect directors and cause us to take other
corporate actions. In addition, the existence of these
provisions, together with Delaware law, might hinder or delay an
attempted takeover other than through negotiations with our
board of directors.
Purchasers
in this offering may experience substantial dilution in the
value of their investment if we issue additional shares of our
capital stock.
Our charter documents allow us to issue up to
100,000,000 shares of our common stock and to issue and
designate the rights of, without stockholder approval, up to
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. In the event we issue
additional shares of our capital stock, dilution to our
stockholders could result. In addition, if we issue and
designate a class of preferred stock, these securities may
provide for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of
holders of our common stock.
25
INFORMATION
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties, such as statements about our plans,
objectives, expectations, assumptions, and future events. In
some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terminology such as “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “plan,” “project,”
“continue,” “ongoing,”
“potential,” “expect,” “predict,”
“believe,” “intend,” “may,”
“will,” “should,” “could,”
“would,” and similar expressions. These statements
involve estimates, assumptions, known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from any future results, performances, or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. Consequently, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks
in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors”
above.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
statements about:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the progress and timing of our development programs and
regulatory approvals for our products;
|
|
|
•
|
the benefits and effectiveness of our products;
|
|
|
•
|
the progress and timing of clinical trials;
|
|
|
•
|
our expectations and capabilities relating to the sales and
marketing of our current products and our product candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
our expectations related to the use of our proceeds from this
offering;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to manufacture sufficient amounts of our product
candidates for clinical trials and products for
commercialization activities;
|
|
|
•
|
the content and timing of submissions to and decisions made by
FDA and other regulatory agencies, including demonstrating to
the satisfaction of FDA the safety and efficacy of our products;
|
|
|
•
|
the rate and causes of infection;
|
|
|
•
|
the accuracy of our estimates of the size and characteristics of
the markets which may be addressed by our products;
|
|
|
•
|
the timing of commercializing our products;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our
business without infringing on the intellectual property of
others;
|
|
|
•
|
our relationship with and consolidation of Quimica Pasteur;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to compete with other companies that are developing
or selling products that are competitive with our products;
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of our products to become the standard of care for
controlling infection in chronic and acute wounds;
|
|
|
•
|
our estimates regarding future operating performance, earnings
and capital requirements;
|
|
|
•
|
our expectations relating to the concentration of our revenue
from international sales; and
|
|
|
•
|
the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any future
changes in accounting regulations or practices in general with
respect to public companies.
|
The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on
which they are made, and, except as required by law, we
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement
to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the
statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor
on our business or the extent to which any factor, or
combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements.
This prospectus contains market data that we obtained from
industry sources. These sources do not guarantee the accuracy or
completeness of the information. Although we believe that the
industry sources are reliable, we have not independently
verified the information.
26
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately
$ million from this offering,
based on an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. If
the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full,
our estimated net proceeds will be approximately
$ million. A $1.00 increase
or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share would increase or
decrease, as applicable, the net proceeds to us by approximately
$ million, assuming the number of
shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the
underwriting discount and our estimated offering expenses.
We currently intend to use the proceeds of this offering as
follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
approximately $ million to
expand our sales and marketing capabilities, including the
expansion of our direct sales force in Europe and the United
States;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
approximately $ million to
fund clinical trials and related research;
|
|
|
•
|
approximately $ million to
expand our manufacturing capabilities; and
|
|
|
•
|
the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes, including
working capital.
|
While we have estimated the particular uses for the net proceeds
to be received upon the completion of this offering, the actual
amounts and timing of any expenditures will depend upon the rate
of growth, if any, of our business, the amount of cash generated
by our operations, status of our research and development
efforts, competitive and technological developments and the
amount of proceeds actually raised in this offering. A portion
of the net proceeds may also be used to acquire or invest in
complementary businesses, technologies, services or products,
although we have no agreements with respect to any such
transactions as of the date of this prospectus. Accordingly, our
management will have significant flexibility in applying the net
proceeds from this offering. Pending these uses described above,
we intend to invest the net proceeds in short-term, investment
grade securities.
We believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together
with our future revenues, cash and cash equivalent balances and
interest we earn on these balances will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash requirements through at least the next
12 months.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. Upon the completion of this offering, we anticipate that
any earnings will be retained for development and expansion of
our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
in the foreseeable future on our common stock. Our board of
directors has sole discretion to pay cash dividends based on our
financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements, contractual obligations and other relevant
factors. In the future, we may also obtain loans or other credit
facilities that may restrict our ability to declare or pay
dividends.
27
CAPITALIZATION
The following table describes our capitalization as of
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
•
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
|
•
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the completion of the Series C Financing;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our
convertible preferred stock into 15,934,718 shares of our
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per
share, which is the midpoint of our expected offering range,
after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
|
You should read this table together with “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and
the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,571
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current
portion
|
|
$
|
3,251
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
(deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, no
par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized,
15,934,718 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares
authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
50,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par
value; no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual;
5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
100,000,000 shares authorized; 16,890,928 shares
issued and outstanding,
actual; shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital
(1)
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
gain (loss)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(54,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’
equity
(1)
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capitalization
(1)
|
|
$
|
9,127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase or decrease, as applicable, this amount on a pro
forma as adjusted basis by approximately
$ million, assuming the number of
shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the
underwriting discount and our estimated offering expenses.
|
28
The information set forth in the table excludes as of
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
•
|
8,741,074 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options and options to be granted
in connection with this offering, at a weighted average exercise
price of $1.19 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
3,892,296 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants, at a weighted average exercise
price of $2.66 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
up
to additional
shares of our common stock reserved for future grant under our
equity plans, including our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
29
DILUTION
Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2006 was
approximately $4.3 million, or $0.13 per share of
common stock. Our net tangible book value per share represents
the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities,
divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Dilution of pro forma net tangible book value per share
represents the difference between the amount per share paid by
purchasers of shares of common stock in this offering and the
pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of
common stock immediately after completion of this offering.
After giving effect to the sale
of shares
of common stock at an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, which is the
midpoint of our expected offering range, and after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us and giving effect to the sale of 338,156 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock at $4.50 per
share on September 14, 2006, our pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value as of June 30, 2006 would have been
$ million, or
$ per share of common stock.
This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value
of $ per share of common
stock to existing common stockholders and an immediate dilution
in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of
$ per share to new investors
purchasing shares of common stock in this offering. The
following table illustrates this per share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed offering price per share
of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share
at June 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book
value per share attributable to the issue of new shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible
book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to investors in
this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share would
increase or decrease, as applicable, our pro forma as adjusted
net tangible book value by
$ million, pro forma as adjusted
net tangible book value per share by
$ per share and the dilution to
investors in this offering by $ per
share, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
The following table summarizes, as of September 15, 2006,
the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the
total consideration paid and the average price per share paid to
us by existing and new investors purchasing shares of common
stock in this offering assuming an initial public offering price
of $ per share, which is the
midpoint of our expected offering range, before deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
33,163,802
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
60,601,755
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share would
increase or decrease, as applicable, total consideration paid by
new investors and total consideration paid by all stockholders
by $ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover of
this prospectus, remains the same.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, our existing stockholders would own % and our
new investors would own % of the total number of
shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering.
30
The number of shares of our common stock referred to above that
will be outstanding immediately after completion of this
offering is based on 33,163,802 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of September 15, 2006, reflects the
automatic conversion of our preferred stock into
16,272,874 shares of common stock and excludes:
|
|
|
|
•
|
8,741,074 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options and options granted in
connection with this offering, at a weighted-average exercise
price of $1.19 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
3,892,296 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants, at a weighted average exercise
price of $2.66 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
up
to additional
shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our
equity plans, including our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
If all of our outstanding options and warrants as of
September 15, 2006 were exercised, our pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
would be $ per share,
representing an increase attributable to new investors of
$ per share, and there would
be an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors.
In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due to
market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe
we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating
plans. To the extent that additional capital is raised through
the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance
of these securities could result in further dilution to our
stockholders.
31
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data together with “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
and our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated
statements of operations data for the three months ended June
30, 2005 and 2006 and the selected consolidated balance sheet
data as of June 30, 2006 are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated
statements of operations data for each of the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the selected consolidated
balance sheet data as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 have been
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
selected consolidated statements of operations data for the
years ended March 31, 2002 and 2003 and the selected
consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2002, 2003
and 2004 have been derived from our consolidated financial
statements and related notes not included in this prospectus.
The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the
year ended March 31, 2003 and the selected consolidated
balance sheet data as of March 31, 2003 have not been
audited. The unaudited financial statements include, in the
opinion of management, all adjustments that management considers
necessary for the fair presentation of the financial information
set forth in those statements. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in
the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
1,966
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Service
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Service
(1)
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
(2,166
|
)
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
373
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and
development
(1)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
(1)
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
12,492
|
|
|
|
15,933
|
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
18,533
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(1,468
|
)
|
|
|
(7,097
|
)
|
|
|
(16,312
|
)
|
|
|
(20,851
|
)
|
|
|
(3,984
|
)
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(21,118
|
)
|
|
|
(4,065
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
Loss on discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(23,099
|
)
|
|
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: basic
and
diluted
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
|
(1.28
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
used in per common share calculations: basic and diluted
|
|
|
15,182
|
|
|
|
15,309
|
|
|
|
15,647
|
|
|
|
15,659
|
|
|
|
16,602
|
|
|
|
15,878
|
|
|
|
16,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per common
share: basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average number
of shares used in per common share calculations: basic and
diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the following stock-based compensation charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Service
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for a
description of the method used to compute basic and diluted net
loss per share and number of shares used in computing historical
basic and diluted net loss per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
|
$
|
3,287
|
|
|
$
|
7,448
|
|
|
$
|
6,134
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(1,186
|
)
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
5,127
|
|
|
|
3,393
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
2,992
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
12,689
|
|
|
|
13,378
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
(deficit)
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
7,338
|
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
33
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read together with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results
may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth under “Risk Factors,”
“Information Regarding Forward-looking Statements” and
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We develop, manufacture and market a family of products intended
to prevent and eliminate infection in chronic and acute wounds.
Infection is a serious potential complication in both chronic
and acute wounds, and controlling infection is a critical step
in wound healing. Our platform technology, called Microcyn, is a
non-toxic, super-oxidized water-based solution that is designed
to eliminate a wide range of pathogens including viruses, fungi,
spores and antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria such as
Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus,
or MRSA, and
Vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus,
or VRE, in wounds. In
clinical testing, our products eliminated a wide range of
pathogens and were found to be safe, easy to use and
complementary to most existing treatment methods in wound care.
Our experience and clinical data indicate that the use of
Microcyn may shorten hospital stays, lower aggregate patient
care costs and, in certain cases, reduce the need for systemic
antibiotics. Microcyn also has applications in several other
large consumer and professional markets, including respiratory,
dermatology, mold and atmospheric remediation, hard surface
disinfectant and dental markets.
We believe that Microcyn is the first topical product that
eliminates a broad range of bacteria and other infectious
microbes without causing toxic side effects on, or irritation
of, healthy tissue. Unlike most antibiotics, we believe Microcyn
does not target specific strains of bacteria, a practice which
has been shown to promote the development of resistant bacteria.
Because our products are shelf stable and require no special
preparation, they can be used in hospitals, clinics, burn
centers, extended care facilities and in the home.
We currently sell Microcyn in the United States through our
medical and clinical employees and through one national and five
regional distributors. In Europe, we have a seven-person direct
sales force and exclusive distribution agreements with four
distributors, all of which are experienced suppliers to the
wound care market, with an aggregate combined sales force of
over 25 full-time equivalent salespeople. In Mexico, we
sell through a dedicated 75-person contract sales force,
including salespeople, nurses and clinical support staff, and a
network of distributors to both the public and private sector.
The MOH, which approves product selection and procurement for
government hospitals and healthcare institutions, has approved
reimbursement for Microcyn. We plan to expand our direct sales
force in the United States, Europe and Mexico to support our
distribution network.
Our products have received CE Mark approval for wound cleaning
and reduction of infection, three U.S. FDA 510(k) clearances as
a medical device in wound debridement, lubricating, moistening
and dressing and have been granted approval for use as an
antiseptic, disinfectant and sterilant in Mexico. Physicians in
several countries have conducted studies in which Microcyn
eliminated infection in a variety of wounds, including
hard-to-treat
wounds such as diabetic ulcers and burns, and, in some cases,
reduced the need for systemic antibiotics. In July 2006, we
completed a pivotal clinical trial for pre-operative skin
preparation. The FDA has requested an additional pivotal trial
and additional microbiology and dermatology studies. Before we
initiate our second pivotal trial, we plan to discuss with the
FDA its request for an additional pivotal trial and additional
data. Depending on the results of these discussions, we may
reassess our priorities, clinical timelines and schedules for
filing the NDA for pre-operative skin preparation. In the event
that we proceed with the second pivotal trial and, assuming that
the second pivotal trial and the additional studies are
successful, we intend to file an NDA for the use of Microcyn as
a pre-operative skin preparation in late 2007.
We intend to seek FDA approval for the use of Microcyn to
eliminate infection and accelerate healing in wounds. We have
established a protocol, based on comments from the FDA, for a
Phase IIb clinical trial to be conducted in patients with
diabetic foot ulcers and other open wounds comparing clinical
cure rates and the
34
rate of wound healing. This clinical trial is expected to cost
approximately $3 million and will be funded through
proceeds from this offering. We anticipate this clinical trial
to be completed in late 2007.
In the event we choose to pursue a partnering arrangement to
commercialize products, we would expect a larger portion of our
revenues would be derived from licensing as opposed to direct
sales.
We also have a non-Microcyn based compound in the research and
development phase. This compound has potential applications in
oncology. We anticipate spending approximately $500,000 on
further clinical studies on this compound, funded by proceeds
from this offering. We expect these studies to be completed in
2008.
We have incurred significant net losses since our inception and
had an accumulated deficit of $54.7 million as of
June 30, 2006. We expect to incur significant expenses in
the foreseeable future as we seek to commercialize our products,
and we cannot be sure that we will achieve profitability.
Financial
Operations Overview
Revenues
We derive our revenues from product sales and service
arrangements. Product revenues are generated from the sale of
Microcyn to hospitals, medical centers, doctors, pharmacies,
distributors and strategic partners, and are generally recorded
upon shipment following receipt of a purchase order or upon
obtaining proof of sell-through by a distributor. Product sales
are made either through direct sales personnel or distributors.
Historically, a significant majority of our product sales have
been in Mexico.
Service revenues are derived from consulting and testing
contracts. Service revenues are generally recorded upon
performance under the service contract. Revenues generated from
testing contracts are recorded upon completion of the test and
when the final report is sent to the customer. We have refocused
our business efforts away from consulting and testing services
toward the commercialization of Microcyn. As a result, we expect
service revenues to continue to significantly decline in future
periods.
Cost of
Revenues
Cost of product revenues represents the costs associated with
the manufacturing of our products, including operating expenses
for our various facilities which are fixed, and related
personnel cost and the cost of materials used to produce our
products. Cost of service revenues consists primarily of
personnel related expenses and supplies.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense consists of costs related to
the research and development of Microcyn and our manufacturing
process. Research and development expense represents costs
incurred to enhance our manufacturing process, to develop
products and new delivery systems for our products and to carry
out preclinical studies and clinical trials to obtain various
regulatory approvals. Research and development expense is
charged as incurred.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense consists of
personnel related costs, including salaries and sales
commissions, and education and promotional expenses associated
with Microcyn and costs related to administrative personnel and
senior management. These expenses also include the costs of
educating physicians and other healthcare professionals
regarding our products and participating in industry conferences
and seminars. Selling, general and administrative expense also
includes travel costs, outside consulting services, legal and
accounting fees and other professional and administrative costs.
35
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
Prior to April 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based
employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the
provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
or APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees,” and its interpretations and applied the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” We used the
minimum value method to measure the fair value of awards issued
prior to April 1, 2006 with respect to its application
requirements under SFAS No. 123.
Effective April 1, 2006, we adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) “Share Based Payment,” or
SFAS 123(R). This statement is a revision of
SFAS Statement No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, and its related implementation guidance.
SFAS 123(R) addresses all forms of share-based payment, or
SBP, awards including shares issued under employee stock
purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock
appreciation rights. Under SFAS 123(R), SBP awards result
in a cost that will be measured at fair value on the
awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards
that are expected to vest and will result in a charge to
operations.
Under SFAS 123(R), nonpublic entities, including those that
become public entities after June 15, 2005, that used the
minimum value method of measuring equity share options and
similar instruments for either recognition or pro forma
disclosure purposes under Statement 123 are required to apply
SFAS 123(R) prospectively to new awards and to awards
modified, repurchased or cancelled after the date of adoption.
In addition, SFAS 123(R) requires such entities to continue
accounting for any portion of awards outstanding at the date of
initial application using the accounting principles originally
applied to those awards. Accordingly, we record stock-based
compensation expense relating to awards granted prior to
April 1, 2006 that are expected to vest in periods ending
after April 1, 2006 in accordance with the provisions of
APB No. 25 and related interpretive guidance.
We have adopted the prospective method with respect to
accounting for our transition to SFAS 123(R). Accordingly,
we recognized in salaries and related expense $52,000 of
stock-based compensation expense in the three months ended
June 30, 2006, which represents the intrinsic value of
options granted prior to April 1, 2006 that we continue to
account for using the recognition and measurement principles
prescribed under APB No. 25.
Discontinued
Operations
On June 16, 2005, we entered into a series of agreements
with Quimica Pasteur, or QP, a Mexico-based distributor of
pharmaceutical products to hospitals and health care entities
owned
and/or
operated by the Mexican Ministry of Health, or MOH. These
agreements provided, among other things, for QP to act as our
exclusive distributor of Microcyn to the MOH for a period of
three years.
In connection with these agreements, an individual designated by
us who is also one of our executive officers, concurrently
acquired, in his individual capacity, a small interest in QP. We
were granted an option to acquire the remaining 99.75% of QP
directly from its principals in exchange for 600,000 shares
of common stock, contingent upon QP’s attainment of certain
financial milestones. Two of our employees were appointed as
officers of QP, which resulted in the establishment of financial
control of QP by our company under applicable accounting
literature. In addition, due to its liquidity circumstances, QP
was unable to sustain operations without our financial and
management support. Accordingly, QP was deemed to be a variable
interest entity in accordance with FIN 46R and the results
of QP were therefore consolidated with our financial statements
for the period from June 16, 2005 through March 26,
2006, the effective termination date of the distribution and
related agreements.
In connection with an audit of QP’s financial statements in
late 2005, we were made aware of a number of facts that
suggested that QP or its principals may have engaged in some
form of fraudulent tax avoidance practice prior to the execution
of the agreements between our company and QP. We did not
discover these facts prior to our execution of these agreements
or for several months thereafter. Our prior independent auditors
informed us that we did not have effective anti-fraud programs
designed to detect the activities in which QP’s principals
engaged or the personnel to effectively evaluate and determine
the accounting for non-
36
routine or complex accounting transactions. Our audit committee
engaged an outside law firm to conduct an investigation whose
findings implicated QP’s principals in a systemic tax
avoidance practice prior to June 16, 2005. Based on the
results of this investigation, we terminated our agreements with
QP on March 26, 2006. We estimate that taxes, interest and
penalties related to these practices could amount to
$7 million or more. QP had a well-established relationship
with the MOH. Although we lost the benefit of this relationship
when we terminated our agreements with QP, we continue to sell
to the MOH through our dedicated direct sales force and through
other distributors. As of June 30, 2006, our sales to the
MOH were not negatively affected by the termination of our
relationship with QP and we do not expect that it will have a
significant effect on sales to the MOH in the future.
In accordance with SFAS 144, we have reported QP’s
results for the period of June 16, 2005 through
March 26, 2006 as discontinued operations because the
operations and cash flows of QP have been eliminated from our
ongoing operations as a result of the termination of these
agreements. We no longer have any continuing involvement with QP
as of the date on which the agreements were terminated. Amounts
associated with the loss upon the termination of the agreements
with QP, which consisted of funds we advanced to QP to provide
it with working capital, are presented separately from QP’s
operating results.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to exercise its judgment. We
exercise considerable judgment with respect to establishing
sound accounting polices and in making estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities,
our recognition of revenues and expenses, and disclosure of
commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial
statements.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments.
Areas in which we exercise significant judgment include, but are
not necessarily limited to, our valuation of accounts
receivable, inventory, depreciation, amortization,
recoverability of long-lived assets, income taxes, equity
transactions (compensatory and financing) and contingencies. We
have also adopted certain polices with respect to our
recognition of revenue that we believe are consistent with the
guidance provided under Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104.
We base our estimates and judgments on a variety of factors
including our historical experience, knowledge of our business
and industry, current and expected economic conditions, the
attributes of our products, regulatory environment, and in
certain cases, the results of outside appraisals. We
periodically re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions with
respect to these judgments and modify our approach when
circumstances indicate that modifications are necessary.
While we believe that the factors we evaluate provide us with a
meaningful basis for establishing and applying sound accounting
policies, we cannot guarantee that the results will always be
accurate. Since the determination of these estimates requires
the exercise of judgment, actual results could differ from such
estimates.
A description of significant accounting polices that require us
to make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements is as follows:
Revenue
Recognition and Accounts Receivable
We generate product revenues from sales of our products to
hospitals, medical centers, doctors, pharmacies, distributors
and strategic partners. We sell our products directly to third
parties and to distributors through various cancelable
distribution agreements. We have also entered into an agreement
to license our products.
We apply the revenue recognition principles set forth in
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin, or
SAB, 104 “Revenue Recognition,” with respect to all of
our revenues. Accordingly, we record revenues when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the sale is
reasonable assured.
37
We require all of our product sales to be supported by evidence
of a sale transaction that clearly indicates the selling price
to the customer, shipping terms and payment terms. Evidence of
an arrangement generally consists of a contract or purchase
order approved by the customer. We have ongoing relationships
with certain customers from which we customarily accept orders
by telephone in lieu of a purchase order.
We recognize revenues at the time in which we receive a
confirmation that the goods were either tendered at their
destination when shipped “FOB destination,” or
transferred to a shipping agent when shipped “FOB shipping
point.” Delivery to the customer is deemed to have occurred
when the customer takes title to the product. Generally, title
passes to the customer upon shipment, but could occur when the
customer receives the product based on the terms of the
agreement with the customer.
While we have a policy of investigating the creditworthiness of
our customers, we have, under certain circumstances, shipped
goods in the past and deferred the recognition of revenues when
available information indicates that collection is in doubt. We
establish allowances for doubtful accounts when available
information causes us to believe that a credit loss is probable.
We market a substantial portion of our goods through
distributors. In Europe, we defer recognition of
distributor-generated revenues until the time we confirm that
distributors have sold these goods. Although our terms provide
for no right of return, our products have a finite shelf life
and we may, at our discretion, accommodate distributors by
accepting returns to avoid the distribution of expired goods.
Service revenues are recorded upon performance of the service
contracts. Revenues generated from testing contracts are
recorded when the test is completed and the final report is sent
to the customer.
Inventory
and Cost of Revenues
We state our inventory at the lower of cost, determined using
the
first-in,
first-out method, or market, based on standard costs.
Establishing standard manufacturing costs requires us to make
estimates and assumptions as to the quantities and costs of
materials, labor and overhead that are required to produce a
finished good. Cost of service revenues is expensed when
incurred.
Income
Taxes
We are required to determine the aggregate amount of income tax
expense or loss based upon tax statutes in jurisdictions in
which we conduct business. In making these estimates, we adjust
our results determined in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles for items that are treated differently by
the applicable taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities, as a result of these differences, are reflected on
our balance sheet for temporary differences in loss and credit
carryforwards that will reverse in subsequent years. We also
establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when
it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances are based, in
part, on predictions that management must make as to our results
in future periods. The outcome of events could differ over time
which would require that we make changes in our valuation
allowance.
Equity
Transactions
Under generally accepted accounting principles, we have the
ability to choose between two alternative methods of accounting
for employee stock based compensation: the intrinsic value
method or the fair value method. Although we have adopted the
intrinsic value method, the results we could derive under the
fair value method could differ significantly. In addition, since
our stock is not publicly traded, we must estimate its fair
value. We have used outside valuation specialists that have
relied upon information provided by management to determine
value of our stock and have also made valuation estimates based
on concurrent sales of equity securities for cash and other
business related information.
Deferred
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense, which is a non-cash charge,
results from stock option grants at exercise prices that, for
financial reporting purposes, are deemed to be below the fair
value of the underlying
38
common stock. We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period of the underlying
option, which is generally five years. The amount of stock-based
compensation expense expected to be amortized in future periods
may decrease if unvested options for which deferred stock-based
compensation expense has been recorded are subsequently
cancelled or may increase if future option grants are made with
exercise prices below the deemed fair value of the common stock
on the date of measurement.
During the period from April 1, 2005 to March 31,
2006, we granted options to purchase a total of 3,148,000 shares
of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $1.10 to
$3.00 per share and at a weighted average exercise price of
$2.30 per share. We obtained a contemporaneous valuation
from an independent valuation specialist in July 2005. This
valuation was used by our board of directors to establish the
fair market value of our common stock with respect to the
majority of options granted in the year ended March 31,
2006. Our other options were granted at fair market value as
determined by our board of directors. Given the absence of an
active market for our common stock and resulting lack of
liquidity in the year ended March 31, 2006, our board of
directors determined the estimated fair value of our common
stock on the date of grant based on several factors, including
the offering prices and liquidation preferences of our preferred
stock, progress and milestones achieved in our business, our
financial condition, equity market conditions, trading ranges of
comparable public companies and the likelihood of achieving a
liquidity event such as an initial public offering or a sale of
the company given prevailing market conditions.
After receipt of the independent valuation in July 2005, our
board of directors reassessed the value of our common stock. In
reassessing the value of our common stock, we used a
straight-line approach because we determined no single event
supported incremental movement in the underlying stock. Further,
we believe this approach is consistent with valuation
methodologies applied by similar companies pursuing an initial
public offering. Based upon this process, we determined that the
reassessed fair value of options granted from August 7,
2003 through April 1, 2005 ranged from $0.82 to $2.28 per
share. Accordingly, we recorded deferred stock-based
compensation of $233,000, $2.8 million and $401,000 during
the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board, or
APB, Opinion 25. The deferred stock-based compensation is
being amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period
of the related awards, which is generally five years. For the
years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we recorded
employee stock-based compensation of $30,000, $2.3 million
and $279,000, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense
recorded during the year ended March 31, 2005 includes
$1.7 million for the intrinsic value of options to purchase
1.2 million shares of common stock granted to our
Chief Executive Officer.
The information regarding net loss as required by SFAS No.
123 presented in Note 3 to our consolidated financial
statements, has been determined as if we had accounted for our
employee stock options under the fair value method. The
resulting effect on net loss pursuant to SFAS No. 123 is
not likely to be representative of the effect on net loss
pursuant to SFAS No. 123 in future years, since future
years are likely to include additional grants and the impact of
future years’ vesting.
Comparison
of Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005
Revenues
Revenues increased $672,000, or 165%, to $1.1 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006, from $406,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2005. Product revenues
increased $649,000, or 254%, to $904,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, from $255,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to a
$462,000 increase in sales of Microcyn products in Mexico and a
$235,000 increase in the sale of Microcyn products in Europe.
Service revenues increased $23,000, or 15%, to $174,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, from $151,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2005.
We expect that product revenues will continue to increase as we
expand our sales and marketing efforts worldwide. As of
June 30, 2006, sales of our products to the MOH were not
negatively affected by the
39
termination of our relationship with QP. We expect that our
service revenues will significantly decline in future periods,
as we continue to implement our strategy of focusing primarily
on our Microcyn business.
Cost of
Revenues
Cost of revenues decreased $35,000, or 5%, to $705,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, from $739,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2005. During the three months
ended June 30, 2006, revenues from product sales exceeded
cost of revenues from product sales as our sales volumes were
sufficient to cover our fixed and variable cost components.
Cost of revenues from product sales remained relatively
consistent at $504,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2006, compared with $490,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2005. Cost of revenues from product sales in the
United States decreased $326,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2005. Beginning in April 2006, we shifted the
focus of our United States facility from manufacturing to
activities related to the research and development of new
Microcyn products. As a result, we began classifying the expense
associated with our United States facility as a research and
development expense, and therefore our fixed cost of product
revenues decreased accordingly. Cost of revenues from product
sales in Europe increased $234,000 to $350,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $116,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2005, as we expanded production
capacity at our European manufacturing facility. Cost of
revenues from products sales in Mexico for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 increased by $105,000 primarily due to
the increased product sales in Mexico and an increase in fixed
costs of manufacturing in Mexico during the period.
We experienced positive gross margins during the three months
ended June 30, 2006, and expect to experience positive
gross margins in future periods. If we fail to increase our
sales volume to sufficient levels in the future, we may have to
examine strategies to reduce our recurring fixed costs of
manufacturing. We expect that cost of revenues will continue to
increase in absolute dollars as product sales increase in future
periods.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense increased $511,000, or 199%, to
$767,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, from
$256,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was primarily attributable to a shift of approximately
$326,000 from manufacturing costs to research and development.
Additionally, $199,000 of this increase was attributable to
higher salary and related expenses in the clinical and
regulatory department. The expansion of our clinical and
regulatory team was due to our increased focus on medical
education, clinical trials and the management of regulatory
trials designed to obtain FDA approvals for our Microcyn
products.
We expect that research and development expense will continue to
increase substantially in future years as we seek additional
regulatory approvals of our Microcyn products. We expect to
expand the scope of our new product development, which may also
result in substantial increases in research and development
expense.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $252,000,
or 7%, to $3.6 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2006, from $3.4 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due
to a $210,000 increase in accounting fees associated with
completion of an audit of our last three fiscal years.
Additionally, selling, general and administrative expense in
Europe increased $297,000 due primarily to the salary and
related fees of new sales and administrative personnel. These
increases were partially offset by lower outside legal and other
consulting fees in the United States of $164,000 and lower
selling, general and administrative expenses in Mexico of
$84,000.
We expect that selling, general and administrative expense will
increase in the future as we increase sales and marketing
personnel, expand our legal and accounting staff and expand our
infrastructure to support the requirements of being a public
company.
40
Interest
Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense decreased $30,000, or 43%, to $39,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 from $69,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily the
result of repayment of borrowings during the year. Interest
income increased $45,000, to $58,000 in the three months ended
June 30, 2006, from $13,000 in the year ended
March 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the result of
higher balances of interest-bearing instruments during the three
months ended June 30, 2006.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was $276,000 net expense in the
three months ended June 30, 2006, compared with
$25,000 net expense in the three months ended June 30,
2005. This change was primarily attributable to a $272,000 loss
on foreign exchange translation adjustment for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, compared to loss of $24,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2005.
Discontinued
Operations
Loss on discontinued operations was $77,000 in the three months
ended June 30, 2005. This charge represents the net assets
associated with QP which were consolidated with our financial
statements as required by FIN 46(R), and later deemed to be
a discontinued operation.
Comparison
of Years Ended March 31, 2006 and March 31,
2005
Revenues
Revenues increased $1.2 million, or 91%, to
$2.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, from
$1.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2005.
Product revenues increased $1.5 million, or 316%, to
$2.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, from
$473,000 for the year ended March 31, 2005. This increase
was primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in sales of
Microcyn60 in Mexico following the expansion of our sales force
in that country and the receipt of product reimbursement by the
MOH.
The increase in product revenues was partially offset by a
$265,000 decrease in service revenues during the year ended
March 31, 2006, as compared to the prior year. The decrease
in service revenues was a result of a shift in our focus from
services to the development of our Microcyn products in fiscal
2006.
Cost of
Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $1.4 million, or 39%, to
$4.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, from
$3.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. Cost
of revenues from product sales principally include fixed costs
associated with plant and labor and to a lesser extent variable
costs associated with packaging and other raw materials. Cost of
revenues from product sales increased $1.7 million, or 76%,
to $3.9 million in the year ended March 31, 2006, from
$2.2 million in the year ended March 31, 2005. This
increase was due primarily to European product manufacturing
beginning in the middle of the year ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to a full year of costs in the year ended
March 31, 2006. As such, total cost of product revenues in
Europe increased $637,000 to $1.0 million for the year
ended March 31, 2006 from $381,000 for the year ended
March 31, 2005. Additionally, we incurred charges we
believe to be
non-recurring.
We wrote off $1.0 million of inventory due to product
labeling issues and expiring shelf life of products as a result
of a one-time build-up of excess product inventory. We also
relocated our manufacturing facility in Mexico and incurred
approximately $200,000 of labor and severance charges related to
the move. These increases were partially offset by a $308,000,
or 23%, decrease in costs related to service revenues to
$1.0 million in the year ended March 31, 2006, from
$1.3 million in the year ended March 31, 2005. The
lower cost of service revenues was related to our shift in focus
to product development and the sale of our Microcyn products
during fiscal 2006.
We experienced a gross loss of $2.3 million during the year
ended March 31, 2006. This gross loss was primarily due to
relatively high fixed costs associated with manufacturing our
products and a sales volume that was not sufficient to cover
these costs. Additionally, there were several charges that we
believe to be non-recurring that were incurred during the year
ended March 31, 2006 that increased our gross loss for the
period.
41
The most significant of these charges was the write off of
inventory and the costs associated with the relocation of our
Mexican manufacturing facility as described above.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense increased $946,000, or 57%, to
$2.6 million in the year ended March 31, 2006, from
$1.7 million in the year ended March 31, 2005. This
increase was primarily attributable to the expansion of our
regulatory team, which focused on EPA, FDA and KEMA approvals
for Microcyn products during the period. Additionally, in
September 2005, we commenced our pre-operative skin preparation
pilot studies to support our application for an FDA drug
clearance indicating microbial load reduction. Total spending on
regulatory trials, other clinical studies, and related expenses
increased $1.2 million, or 164%, to $1.9 million for
the year ended March 31, 2006, from $735,000 during the
year ended March 31, 2005. This increase was partially
offset by a $418,000 decrease in spending on new product
development to $497,000 in the year ended March 31, 2006,
from $915,000 in the year ended March 31, 2005.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$3.4 million, or 28%, to $15.9 million during the year
ended March 31, 2006, from $12.5 million during the
year ended March 31, 2005. This increase was partially due
to a $1.8 million increase in United States selling,
general and administrative expense primarily as a result of
higher outside consulting and service fees during the year ended
March 31, 2006. Specifically, outside accounting fees
increased by $653,000 due to the preparation and completion of
an audit of our last four fiscal years, legal fees increased by
$507,000 due to expanded intellectual property and general legal
support, and outside consulting and service fees increased by
$294,000 due to consulting expenses related to the marketing of
our products in Asia.
In addition, sales and marketing expense in Europe increased
$429,000 due to the hiring of additional sales and marketing
personnel during the year ended March 31, 2006.
Selling, general and administrative expense in Mexico increased
$3.3 million in the year ended March 31, 2006 compared
to the prior year primarily due to expanded sales and marketing
efforts in Mexico, as well as non-recurring charges associated
with the relocation of our Mexican subsidiary’s facility.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, we began utilizing
75 full-time, direct sales personnel in the major districts
of Mexico, dedicated to the sale of Microcyn60 in the hospital
and pharmacy markets in Mexico. As a result, sales and marketing
expense in Mexico increased $2.7 million during the year
ended March 31, 2006, compared to the prior year.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was
offset by a $1.8 million decrease in non-cash stock
compensation expense in the year ended March 31, 2006
compared to the prior year. Approximately $1.7 million of
non-cash stock-based compensation expense incurred in the year
ended March 31, 2005 was related to the grant of an option
to purchase 1.2 million shares of common stock to our Chief
Executive Officer.
Interest
Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense decreased $200,000, or 54%, to $172,000 in the
year ended March 31, 2006, from $372,000 in the year ended
March 31, 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of
lower borrowings during the year. Interest income increased
$274,000, to $282,000 in the year ended March 31, 2006,
from $8,000 in the year ended March 31, 2005. This increase
was primarily the result of higher balances of interest-bearing
instruments during the year ended March 31, 2006.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was $377,000 net expense in the
year ended March 31, 2006, compared with $146,000 net
income in the year ended March 31, 2005. This change was
primarily attributable to a $283,000
42
loss on foreign exchange translation in the year ended
March 31, 2006, as compared to a gain of $134,000 in the
year ended March 31, 2005.
Discontinued
Operations
Loss on discontinued operations was $2.0 million in the
year ended March 31, 2006. This loss consisted of $818,000
classified as a loss from operations of discontinued business
and $1.2 million of loss on the disposal of discontinued
business. The loss from operations of discontinued business
represents the net operating loss of QP, which was consolidated
with our financial results as required by FIN 46(R). The
relationship was terminated in the fourth quarter of the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2006 and the loss was classified as a
discontinued operation on our statements of operations. In
addition, $1.2 million of net assets associated with this
entity were written off and classified as a loss on disposal of
discontinued business. As no relationship existed with this
entity prior to the year ended March 31, 2006, no charges
were recognized in prior years.
Comparison
of Years Ended March 31, 2005 and March 31,
2004
Revenues
Revenues increased $454,000, or 50%, to $1.4 million for
the year ended March 31, 2005, from $902,000 for the year
ended March 31, 2004. Product revenues increased $378,000
to $473,000 for the year ended March 31, 2005, as compared
to $95,000 in the prior year. This increase was primarily
attributable to the hiring of new sales and marketing personnel
in Mexico and an increased demand for Microcyn60 in the Mexican
private hospital market.
Service revenues increased $76,000, or 9%, to $883,000 for the
year ended March 31, 2005, as compared to $807,000 for the
prior year. This increase was primarily the result of increased
demand for our laboratory testing services.
Cost of
Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $854,000, or 32%, to
$3.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, from
$2.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2004. Cost
of product revenues increased $808,000 primarily due to the
expansion of our manufacturing capacity in the United States and
Europe and related costs, including operating expenses for new
facilities and an increase in personnel.
Cost of service revenues was $1.3 million for both the
years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
We experienced gross losses during the years ended
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 of $2.2 million
and $1.8 million, respectively. These gross losses were
primarily due to the relatively high fixed costs associated with
manufacturing our products and a sales volume that was not
sufficient to cover these costs. During these years we developed
our manufacturing sites in the United States, Europe and Mexico,
prior to significant sales in those countries.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense increased $241,000, or 17%, to
$1.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, from
$1.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2004. This
increase was primarily related to a $194,000 increase in salary
expense related to the expansion of our research and development
and regulatory teams and a $102,000 increase in consulting
services in the year ended March 31, 2005, as compared to
the prior year.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$8.6 million, or 219%, to $12.5 million for the year
ended March 31, 2005, from $3.9 million for the year
ended March 31, 2004. This increase was due in part to a
$4.1 million increase in general and administrative
expense, primarily personnel costs associated with hiring
43
additional senior management, sales and marketing, operations
and administrative personnel. Additionally, selling, general and
administrative expense was higher due to a $2.0 million
increase in non-cash stock compensation expense in the year
ended March 31, 2005 compared to the prior year.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $194,000, or 109%, to $372,000 in
the year ended March 31, 2005, from $178,000 in the year
ended March 31, 2004. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in non-cash interest expense charged on warrants issued
in connection with debt financing transactions in the year ended
March 31, 2005.
Other
Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net was net income of $146,000 in the
year ended March 31, 2005, compared to net expense of
$26,000 in the year ended March 31, 2004. The change was
primarily attributable to a gain of $134,000 on foreign exchange
transactions in the year ended March 31, 2005, compared to
a loss of $4,000 in the prior year.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses and, as
of June 30, 2006, we had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $54.7 million. We have not yet achieved
profitability. We expect that our research and development and
selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to
increase and, as a result, we will need to generate significant
product revenues to achieve profitability. We may never achieve
profitability.
Sources
of Liquidity
Since our inception, substantially all of our operations have
been financed through the sale of our common and preferred
stock. Through June 30, 2006, we had received net proceeds
of $3.5 million from the sale of common stock,
$6.6 million from the sale of Series A convertible
preferred stock, $43.7 million from the sale of
Series B convertible preferred stock and $304,000 from the
issuance of common stock to employees, consultants and directors
in connection with the exercise of stock options. We have
received additional funding through loans and capital equipment
leases, as described below. We have also used our revenues to
date as a source of additional liquidity. As of June 30,
2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6.1 million and
debt under our notes payable and equipment loans of
$4.8 million.
In June 2006, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with
a financial institution to borrow a maximum of
$5.0 million. The facility allows us to borrow a maximum of
$2.8 million in working capital, $1.3 million in
accounts receivable financing and $1.0 million in equipment
financing, subject to certain conditions. In conjunction with
this agreement, we issued warrants to purchase up to
300,000 shares of our Series B preferred stock at an
exercise price of $4.50 per share. Warrants to purchase
215,000 shares were earned and exercisable at execution of
the agreement, and warrants to purchase 85,000 shares will
be earned on a pro rata basis upon our use of this facility. As
of August 31, 2006, we had borrowed $4.2 million
against this facility at an interest rate of 8.5%. Draws under
this facility bear interest at prime plus one-half percent.
On September 14, 2006, we sold 338,156 units, consisting of
338,156 shares of our Series C convertible preferred
stock and warrants to purchase 67,631 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, at a per
unit price of $4.50 for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,521,702.
In connection with this sale, we paid to Brookstreet Securities
Corporation, as placement agent, an aggregate of $152,170 in
commissions and issued to Brookstreet fully vested warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 42,269 shares of our common stock
at an exercise price of $4.50 per share.
Cash
Flows
As of June 30, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$6.1 million, compared to $7.4 million at
March 31, 2006 and $3.3 million at March 31, 2005.
44
Net cash used in operating activities was $5.6 million,
$13.5 million and $19.7 million in the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and
$4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Net cash used in each of these periods primarily reflects net
loss for these periods, offset in part by non-cash charges in
operating assets and liabilities, non-cash stock-based
compensation and depreciation.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.0 million,
$1.1 million and $897,000 for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and $803,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Cash was used
primarily to invest in fixed assets and other capital
expenditures to support increased personnel and manufacturing
facility expansion in Europe and Mexico during the years ended
March 31, 2004 and 2005. We expect to continue to make
significant investments in the purchase of property and
equipment to support our expanding operations.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was $7.3 million,
$17.2 million and $26.6 million, respectively, and
$4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The net cash provided by financing activities for the year end
periods was primarily attributable to the sale of convertible
preferred stock, which generated $6.6 million,
$16.7 million and $27.0 million for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. In addition,
net proceeds from debt financing added $574,000,
$1.2 million and $257,000 for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and
$4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Debt financing consisted primarily of notes payable to
individuals and secured notes issued to finance the purchase of
capital equipment, corporate insurance premiums and general
operations.
Contractual
Obligations
As of March 31, 2006, we had contractual obligations as follows
(long-term debt and capital lease amounts include principal
payments only):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have leases covering approximately 31,000 square feet of
office and manufacturing space, which will increase to
approximately 40,000 square feet in October 2006, in
Petaluma, California, expiring in 2007. This additional square
footage will increase our monthly rent from $13,763 to $23,493.
We also have leases covering approximately 19,000 square
feet of office and manufacturing space in Sittard, The
Netherlands expiring in 2009, and approximately
12,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space and
5,000 square feet of warehouse space in Zapopan, Mexico,
expiring in 2011 and 2007, respectively.
In June 2006, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with
a financial institution to borrow a maximum of
$5.0 million. The facility allows us to borrow a maximum of
$2.8 million in working capital, $1.3 million in
accounts receivable financing and $1.0 million in equipment
financing, subject to certain conditions. As a result, our
long-term debt has increased to $4.8 million as of
June 30, 2006.
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as such term
is defined in rules promulgated by the SEC.
Operating
Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements
We expect to continue to incur substantial operating losses in
the future and to make capital expenditures to support the
expansion of our research and development programs and to expand
our commercial operations. We anticipate using a portion of the
proceeds from this offering to finance these activities. It may
take several years to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals
to commercialize Microcyn as a drug in the United States.
45
We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering and the
Series C Financing to fund approximately
$ million in expenses related
to the expansion of our sales and marketing capabilities,
including the expansion of our direct sales forces in the United
States and Europe, approximately
$ million to fund clinical
trials and related research, approximately
$ million to expand our
manufacturing capabilities and the remaining proceeds for
general corporate purposes, including working capital. A portion
of the net proceeds may also be used to acquire or invest in
complementary businesses, technologies, services or products.
The amount and timing of actual expenditures may vary
significantly depending upon the rate of growth, if any, of our
business, the amount of cash generated by our operations, status
of our research and development efforts, competitive and
technological developments and the amount of proceeds actually
raised in this offering.
We currently anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents,
together with proceeds from this offering and the Series C
Financing and revenue generated by the sale of our products,
will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next
12 months.
Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the scope, rate of progress and cost of our clinical trials and
other research and development activities;
|
|
|
•
|
future clinical trial results;
|
|
|
•
|
the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other
arrangements that we may establish;
|
|
|
•
|
the cost and timing of regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
•
|
the cost and delays in product development as a result of any
changes in regulatory oversight applicable to our products;
|
|
|
•
|
the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and
distribution capabilities;
|
|
|
•
|
the effect of competing technological and market developments;
|
|
|
•
|
the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any
patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
•
|
the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products
and technologies.
|
If we are unable to generate a sufficient amount of revenue to
finance our operations, research and development and regulatory
plans, we may seek to raise additional funds through public or
private equity offerings, debt financings, capital lease
transactions, corporate collaborations or other means. We may
seek to raise additional capital due to favorable market
conditions or strategic considerations even if we have
sufficient funds for planned operations. The sale of additional
equity or convertible debt securities could result in dilution
to our stockholders. To the extent that we raise additional
funds through collaborative arrangements, it may be necessary to
relinquish some rights to our technologies or grant licenses on
terms that are not favorable to us. We do not know whether
additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at
all. If we are not able to secure additional funding when
needed, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate
one or more research and development programs or sales and
marketing initiatives.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue
No. 04-8,
“The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on
Diluted Earnings per Share,” the EITF reached a consensus
that contingently convertible instruments, such as contingently
convertible debt, contingently convertible preferred stock and
other such securities should be included in diluted earnings per
share (if dilutive) regardless of whether the market price
trigger has been met. The consensus became effective for
reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have material effect on
our financial statements.
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154,
“Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3”, or SFAS 154. This Statement replaces APB
Opinion No. 20, “Accounting
46
Changes”, and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements”, and
changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of
a change in accounting principle. This Statement applies to all
voluntary changes in accounting principle. It also applies to
changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual
instance that the pronouncement does not include specific
transition provisions. When a pronouncement includes specific
transition provisions, those provisions should be followed.
APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary
changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in
net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of
changing to the new accounting principle. This Statement
requires retrospective application to prior periods’
financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless
it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific
effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is
impracticable to determine the period-specific effects of an
accounting change on one or more individual prior periods
presented, this Statement requires that the new accounting
principle be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities
as of the beginning of the earliest period for which
retrospective application is practicable and that a
corresponding adjustment be made to the opening balance of
retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or
net assets in the statement of financial position) for that
period rather than being reported in an income statement. When
it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of
applying a change in accounting principle to all prior periods,
this Statement requires that the new accounting principle be
applied as if it were adopted prospectively from the earliest
date practicable. This Statement is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005. We do not believe that the
adoption of SFAS 154 will have a significant effect on our
financial statements.
On June 29, 2005, the EITF ratified Issue
No. 05-2,
“The Meaning of ‘Conventional Convertible Debt
Instrument’ in EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own
Stock.” EITF
Issue 05-2
provides guidance on determining whether a convertible debt
instrument is “conventional” for the purpose of
determining when an issuer is required to bifurcate a conversion
option that is embedded in convertible debt in accordance with
SFAS 133. Issue
No. 05-2
is effective for new instruments entered into and instruments
modified in reporting periods beginning after June 29,
2005. We do not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement
will have a significant effect on our financial statements.
In September 2005, the EITF ratified Issue
No. 05-4,
“The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause on a
Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own
Stock’.
EITF 05-4
provides guidance to issuers as to how to account for
registration rights agreements that require an issuer to use its
“best efforts” to file a registration statement for
the resale of equity instruments and have it declared effective
by the end of a specified grace period and, if applicable,
maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement for a
period of time or pay a liquidated damage penalty to the
investor. We are currently in the process of evaluating the
effect that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our
financial statements.
In September 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF Issue
No. 05-7,
“Accounting for Modifications to Conversion Options
Embedded in Debt Instruments and Related Issues,” which
addresses whether a modification to a conversion option that
changes its fair value affects the recognition of interest
expense for the associated debt instrument after the
modification and whether a borrower should recognize a
beneficial conversion feature, not a debt extinguishment if a
debt modification increases the intrinsic value of the debt (for
example, the modification reduces the conversion price of the
debt). This issue is effective for future modifications of debt
instruments beginning in the first interim or annual reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not believe
that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant
effect on our financial statements.
In September 2005, the FASB also ratified the EITF’s Issue
No. 05-8,
“Income Tax Consequences of Issuing Convertible Debt with a
Beneficial Conversion Feature,” which discusses whether the
issuance of convertible debt with a beneficial conversion
feature results in a basis difference arising from the intrinsic
value of the beneficial conversion feature on the commitment
date, which is treated and recorded in the shareholder’s
equity for book purposes, but as a liability for income tax
purposes, and, if so, whether that basis
47
difference is a temporary difference under FASB Statement
No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This
Issue should be applied by retrospective application pursuant to
Statement 154 to all instruments with a beneficial
conversion feature accounted for under
Issue 00-27
included in financial statements for reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2005. We do not believe that the
adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant effect on
our financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155
“Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140”, or
FAS 155. FAS 155 addresses the following:
a) permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation; b) clarifies which
interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject
to the requirements of Statement 133; c) establishes a
requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial
assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives
or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an
embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; d) clarifies
that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination
are not embedded derivatives; and e) amends
Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying
special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial
instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than
another derivative financial instrument. FAS 155 is
effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after
the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins
after September 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the
requirements of FAS 155, but do not expect that the
adoption of this pronouncement will have a material effect on
our financial statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156 —
“Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets —
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,” or
SFAS 156. SFAS 156 is effective for the first fiscal
year beginning after September 15, 2006. SFAS 156
changes the way entities account for servicing assets and
obligations associated with financial assets acquired or
disposed of. We have not yet completed our evaluation of the
impact of adopting SFAS 156 on our results of operations or
financial position, but do not expect that the adoption of
SFAS 156 will have a material impact.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by
the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require
adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Income
Taxes
Since inception, we have incurred operating losses and,
accordingly, have not recorded a provision for income taxes for
any of the periods presented. As of March 31, 2006, we had
net operating loss carryforwards for federal, state and foreign
income tax purposes of approximately $28.8 million,
$25.9 million and $17.4 million, respectively. The
carryforwards expire beginning 2020, 2010 and 2014,
respectively. We also had, as of March 31, 2006, federal
and state research credit carryforwards of approximately
$104,000 and $108,000, respectively. The federal credits expire
beginning 2026, and the state credits have no expiration.
We have experienced substantial ownership changes in connection
with financing transactions completed through the year ended
March 31, 2006. Accordingly, our utilization of net
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards against taxable
income in future periods, if any, is subject to substantial
limitations under the Change in Ownership rules of
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. After considering
all available evidence, we have fully reserved for these and
other deferred tax assets since it is more likely than not such
benefits will not be realized in future periods. We will
continue to evaluate our deferred tax assets to determine
whether any changes in circumstances could affect the
realization of their future benefit. If it is determined in
future periods that portions of our deferred income tax assets
satisfy the realization standard of SFAS No. 109, the
valuation allowance will be reduced accordingly.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of changes in the value of
market risk sensitive instruments caused by fluctuations in
interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.
Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in our results
of operations and cash flows.
48
Our exposure to interest rate risk is confined to our excess
cash in highly liquid money market funds. The primary objective
of our investment activities is to preserve our capital to fund
operations. We also seek to maximize income from our investments
without assuming significant risk. We do not use derivative
financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Our cash and
investments policy emphasizes liquidity and preservation of
principal over other portfolio considerations.
We have operated primarily in the United States; however we do
have two significant subsidiaries, one each in Europe and
Mexico. In order to mitigate our exposure to foreign currency
rate fluctuations, we maintain minimal cash balances in the
foreign subsidiaries. However, if we are successful in our
efforts to grow internationally, our exposure to foreign
currency rate fluctuations, primarily the Euro and Mexican Peso,
may increase. We are exposed to foreign currency risk related to
the Euro denominated and Mexican Peso denominated intercompany
receivables. Because our intercompany receivables are accounted
for in Euros and Mexican Pesos, any appreciation or devaluation
of the Euro or Mexican Peso will result in a gain or loss to the
consolidated statements of operations.
49
BUSINESS
Overview
We develop, manufacture and market a family of products intended
to prevent and eliminate infection in chronic and acute wounds.
Infection is a serious potential complication in both chronic
and acute wounds, and controlling infection is a critical step
in wound healing. Our platform technology, called Microcyn, is a
non-toxic, super-oxidized water-based solution that is designed
to eliminate a wide range of pathogens, including viruses,
fungi, spores and antibiotic resistant strains of pathogens such
as Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus,
or MRSA,
and Vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus
, or VRE, in wounds.
In clinical testing, our products eliminated a wide range of
pathogens and were found to be safe, easy to use and
complementary to most existing treatment methods in wound care.
Our experience and clinical data indicate that the use of
Microcyn may shorten hospital stays, lower aggregate patient
care costs and, in certain cases, reduce the need for systemic
antibiotics. Microcyn also has applications in several other
large consumer and professional markets, including respiratory,
dermatology, mold and atmospheric remediation, hard surface
disinfectant, and dental markets.
In 2004, chronic and acute wound care represented an aggregate
of $9 billion in global product sales, of which
$3.3 billion was spent for the treatment of skin ulcers,
$1.6 billion to treat burns and $4.7 billion for the
treatment of surgical and trauma wounds, according to Kalorama
Information, a life sciences market research firm. Common
methods of controlling infection, including topical antiseptics
and antibiotics, have proven to be moderately effective in
combating infection in the wound bed. However, topical
antiseptics tend to inhibit the healing process due to their
toxicity and may require specialized preparation or handling.
Antibiotics can lead to the emergence of resistant bacteria,
such as MRSA and VRE. Systemic antibiotics may not be effective
in controlling infection in patients with disorders affecting
circulation, such as diabetes, which are commonly associated
with chronic wounds. As a result, no single treatment is used
across all types of wounds and stages of healing.
We believe Microcyn provides significant advantages over current
methods of care in the treatment of a wide range of chronic and
acute wounds throughout all stages of treatment. These stages
include debridement, cleaning, prevention and elimination of
infection and wound moistening. We believe that Microcyn is the
first topical product that eliminates a broad range of bacteria
and other infectious microbes without causing toxic side effects
on, or irritation of, healthy tissue. Unlike most antibiotics,
we believe Microcyn does not target specific strains of
bacteria, a practice which has been shown to promote the
development of resistant bacteria. Because our products are
shelf stable and require no special preparation, they can be
used in hospitals, clinics, burn centers, extended care
facilities and in the home.
Our goal is to become a worldwide leader in wound care by
establishing Microcyn as the standard of care for preventing and
eliminating infection in chronic and acute wounds. We intend to
seek regulatory clearances and approvals for, and to market,
Microcyn worldwide. We initiated our commercial activities in
Mexico, where, after receiving approval for the use of Microcyn
as an antiseptic, disinfectant and sterilant, we began selling
in July 2004. Since then, physicians in the United States,
Europe and Mexico have conducted thirteen physician clinical
studies in which Microcyn eliminated infection in a variety of
wounds, including
hard-to-treat
wounds such as diabetic ulcers and burns and, in some cases,
reduced the need for systemic antibiotics. We used the data
generated from some of these studies to support our application
for the CE Mark for wound cleaning and reduction of infection,
which we received in November 2004. To date, Microcyn has
received three FDA 510(k) clearances for use as a medical
device in wound debridement, lubricating, moistening and
dressing. In July 2006, we completed a pivotal clinical
trial for pre-operative skin preparation. The FDA has requested
an additional pivotal trial and additional microbiology and
dermatology studies. Before we initiate our second pivotal
trial, we plan to discuss with the FDA its request for an
additional pivotal trial and additional data. Depending on the
results of these discussions, we may reassess our priorities,
clinical timelines and schedules for filing a New Drug
Application, or NDA, for pre-operative skin preparation. In the
event that we proceed with the second pivotal trial and,
assuming that the second pivotal trial and the additional
studies are successful, we intend to file an NDA for the use of
Microcyn as a pre-operative skin preparation in late 2007.
50
In addition, we intend to seek FDA approval for the use of
Microcyn to eliminate infections and accelerate healing in
wounds. We have established a protocol, based on comments from
the FDA, for a Phase IIb clinical trial to be conducted in
patients with diabetic foot ulcers and other open wounds
comparing the clinical cure rates and healing time of wounds
treated with Microcyn with those not treated with Microcyn. This
clinical trial is scheduled to begin in late 2006 and is
anticipated to last up to 12 months.
Depending upon our analysis of the time and expense involved, we
may choose to license our technology to a third-party as opposed
to pursuing commercialization ourselves.
We currently sell Microcyn in the United States through our
medical and clinical employees and through one national and five
regional distributors. In Europe, we have a seven-person direct
sales force and exclusive distribution agreements with four
distributors, all of which are experienced suppliers to the
wound care market, with an aggregate combined sales force of
over 25 full-time equivalent salespeople. In Mexico, we
sell through a dedicated 75-person contract sales force,
including salespeople, nurses and clinical support staff, and a
network of distributors to both the public and private sector.
The MOH, which approves product selection and procurement for
government hospitals and healthcare institutions, has approved
reimbursement for Microcyn. We plan to expand our direct sales
force in the United States, Europe and Mexico to support our
distribution network.
Industry
Background
Wound Care Industry Overview
According to Medtech Insight, a Division of Windhover
Information, there were over 90 million incidents of wounds
in the United States during 2004. Of these, over six million
were chronic wounds, including arterial, diabetic, pressure and
venous ulcers. The remaining 84 million were acute wounds,
which follow the normal process of healing and commonly include
burns, traumatic wounds, and approximately 67 million
surgical incisions.
Key trends in wound care include:
|
|
|
|
•
|
large and increasing elderly, diabetic and obese populations,
each of which is vulnerable to developing a variety of
difficult-to-heal
ulcers;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
increased emphasis on controlling the cost of patient care in
hospitals, wound care centers and in private practice;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
technological innovation, which has expanded treatment options
from traditional ointments and gauze to include advanced
treatments, such as vacuum devices, silver dressings, ultrasound
and skin grafts;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
increased focus on improving the patient experience, including
reduction of pain and accelerated healing time; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
adjunctive nature of the market where multiple treatment methods
are employed, either simultaneously or sequentially, depending
on the type and stage of the wound.
|
Wound care is complex, and controlling infection is a critical
step in wound healing.
Difficult-to-heal
wounds can result from traumatic injury, diabetes, peripheral
vascular disease, complications following surgery, rheumatoid
arthritis, congestive heart failure, arterial or venous ulcers
and many other conditions which compromise circulation. Without
proper medical intervention and control of infection, these
types of wounds typically remain open and chronically infected.
Chronic Wounds
Chronic wounds are wounds that do not heal within a normally
expected time frame under standard care. The most frequently
occurring chronic wounds are venous, arterial, pressure and
diabetic foot ulcers. According to Medtech Insight, in 2004, the
incidence of chronic wounds in the United States was
approximately 6.1 million, comprised of 2.0 million
pressure ulcers, 1.7 million arterial ulcers,
1.6 million venous ulcers and 800,000 diabetic foot ulcers.
In addition to being expensive to treat, chronic wounds are
51
debilitating, painful and can result in amputations and other
serious consequences. Clinical studies suggest that, depending
on the severity of the wound, up to 43% of patients with
diabetic foot ulcers undergo an amputation. Furthermore, the
five year survival rate for patients undergoing amputations as a
result of diabetic foot ulcers is 27%.
The increasing prevalence of chronic wounds is driven by the
large and growing elderly, diabetic and obese populations.
Aging.
People aged 65 and over are more
susceptible to wounds that become chronic than the overall
population. In 2006, there were more than 37 million people
in the United States over 65, representing more than 12% of the
population. By 2030, this group is expected to comprise more
than 19% of the total population of the United States, according
to U.S. Census Bureau projections. Furthermore, according
to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, the
incidence of diabetes is significantly higher in people over 65:
in 2004, 16% of people over 65 were diabetic compared to 7.5% of
the total population. Additionally, according to Medtech
Insight, 70% of pressure ulcers occur in people age
70 years or older and 25% of patients in nursing homes
suffer from pressure ulcers.
Diabetes.
Diabetics are particularly
vulnerable to chronic wounds as a result of the debilitating
effect of diabetes on the circulatory system. According to CDC,
one out of three children born in 2000 in the United States will
develop diabetes. There are currently approximately
14.7 million diabetic Americans, representing 5% of the
total population, up from 2.7% in 1990.
Obesity.
Obesity is a leading cause of
Type II, or “adult onset,” diabetes, making the
obese population more likely to eventually sustain chronic
wounds. Obesity in the United States is a growing problem.
According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive
and Kidney Diseases in 2000, more than 30% of the United States
adult population was obese, up from 13% in 1960.
Acute Wounds
Acute wounds are typically caused by traumatic injury or
surgical incision and are broadly categorized as those that can
be expected to heal within a definable timeframe. However, the
healing process may be affected by complicating factors such as
infection, leading to chronic wounds.
All acute wounds have the potential for infection and may
require prophylactic treatment to prevent infection. According
to Medtech Insight, in 2004, about 16.2 million traumatic
wounds were treated, including 8.7 million open wounds.
Also according to Medtech Insight, in 2004, approximately
67 million surgical wounds were reported in the United
States, including 36 million completed under anesthesia.
Despite modern infection control procedures, and technologies at
hospitals and surgery centers, every time the skin is opened
there is a risk of infection. We believe that there is a higher
likelihood of infection in surgeries involving anesthesia
because of the length of time the wound is open. In a clinical
study on surgical infections, it was shown that infection rates
vary with the time required to complete the surgery. For
example, infection rates varied from about 3.6% for surgeries
taking less than 30 minutes to about 16.4% for those longer than
5 hours.
Critical Steps for Wound Treatment
Infection Control
According to the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths, or RID,
one out of every 20 patients contracts an infection while
in the hospital. Certain infections are increasingly dangerous
because they cannot be effectively controlled by commonly used
antibiotics. According to RID’s industry estimates,
infections add more than $30 billion annually to health
care costs in the United States. In addition, RID estimates that
each year in the United States, approximately two million
patients contract infections while in hospitals and, of those,
an estimated 100,000 die as a result. According to a recent
study, patients with surgical site infections incur almost
triple the average hospital costs of other patients. Surgical
site infections account for approximately 500,000 hospital
acquired infections in the United States each year, according to
CDC. Surgical site infections are estimated to cost hospitals
more than $1.0 billion each year in additional medical
treatment.
52
Staphylococcus aureus
, or
Staph
, is one of the
most common hospital acquired infections. One of the deadliest
forms of
Staph
infection is MRSA. According to data from
CDC, in 2003, 57% of the
Staph
infections reported were
MRSA, up from 22% in 1995 and 2% in 1974. Patients who do
survive MRSA often spend months in the hospital and endure
repeated surgeries to remove infected tissue.
When infection is present in a wound, standard treatments can
include cleansing, debridement and systemic antibiotics. Many
cleansing agents can harm tissue, causing irritation and
sensitization and impeding the wound healing process. Some forms
of debridement may increase scar tissue and complicate skin
grafting. Systemic antibiotics may be ineffective if the
patient’s metabolic state is compromised. Additionally, the
effectiveness of oral or systemic antibiotics in diabetic foot
ulcer patients may be diminished due to the patient’s poor
circulation, limiting delivery of the antibiotics to the wound
site.
Because there is a risk of infection with many surgical
procedures, clinicians perform several procedures before and
after surgery designed to prevent infection. Pre-operative
procedures generally involve preparing the surgical site with an
anti-bacterial agent, such as Betadine. Post-operative
procedures can include an anti-infective irrigation, a
therapeutic body cavity cleansing and the use of systemic
antibiotics.
Wound
Healing and Closure
Wound healing is a cascade process comprised of inflammation,
proliferation and maturation. The first stage of the wound
healing process is the inflammatory phase, which is associated
with swelling, redness and heat, and involves the migration of
healthy cells to the wound bed. Removing dead tissue or debris
from the wound prepares the wound bed for regeneration of new
tissue. The second phase is the proliferative phase, which
involves collagen and blood vessel formation and tissue growth.
The final phase, maturation, occurs as the wound begins to take
on its permanent form as collagen is reconstituted, forming new
skin. None of these phases, however, will progress normally in
the presence of infection.
Advanced
Technologies
Techniques and devices have been developed to treat complex and
hard-to-treat
wounds, ranging from specialized devices to antimicrobial
dressings. Negative pressure wound therapy, high pressure oxygen
chambers and localized devices, sophisticated water-based tissue
removal devices, oxygenated mist devices and tissue engineered
skin substitutes are some of the most advanced devices available
to the wound care specialist. Although relatively effective,
many of these treatments have limitations or drawbacks in that
they cannot be used on certain types of wounds or are expensive
and complex to use. Despite these advanced technologies,
treatment of challenging wounds continues to be multi-pronged,
with a number of associated therapies employed in an attempt to
achieve wound closure.
Market
Opportunity — Key Limitations of Existing
Treatments
Commonly used topical antiseptics and antibiotics have
limitations and side effects that may constrain their usage. For
example:
|
|
|
|
•
|
many antiseptics, including Betadine, hydrogen peroxide and
Dakin’s solution, are toxic, can destroy human cells and
tissue, may cause allergic reactions and can impede the wound
healing process;
|
|
|
•
|
silver-based products are expensive and require precise dosage
and close monitoring by trained medical staff to minimize the
potential for allergic reactions and bacterial
resistance; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the increase in antibiotic resistant bacterial strains, such as
MRSA and VRE, have compromised the effectiveness of some widely
used topical antibiotics including Neosporin and Bacitracin.
|
Our
Solution
We believe Microcyn provides significant advantages over current
methods of care in the treatment of chronic and acute wounds,
including the following:
53
|
|
|
|
•
|
Effective.
In physician clinical
studies, our products eliminated a wide range of bacteria that
cause infection in a variety of acute and chronic wounds. In
addition, because of its mechanism of action, we believe
Microcyn does not target specific strains of bacteria, the
practice of which has been shown to promote the development of
resistant bacteria. Where Microcyn was used both independent of
and in conjunction with other wound care therapeutic products,
patients generally experienced less pain, improved mobility and
physical activity levels and better quality of life.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Safe.
Clinical data shows that our
products are non-toxic, do not cause skin irritation and do not
inhibit wound healing. Throughout all our clinical trials and
physician clinical studies to date and since commercialization
in 2004, we have received no reports of adverse events related
to the use of Microcyn.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Easy to Use.
Our products require no
preparation before use or at time of disposal, and caregivers
can use our products without significant training. In addition,
Microcyn can be stored at room temperature and does not require
any specific handling procedures. Unlike other super-oxidized
water solutions, which are typically stable for not more than
48 hours, our laboratory tests show that Microcyn has a
shelf life ranging from one to two years depending on the size
and type of packaging. Our products are also complementary to
most advanced technologies to treat serious wounds, such as
negative pressure wound therapy, jet lavage and
tissue-engineered skin substitutes.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Cost Effective.
Treatment of many
wounds requires extended hospitalization and care, including the
use of expensive systemic antibiotics. Infection prolongs the
healing time and increases the use of systemic antibiotics. Our
clinical trials and physician clinical studies indicate that
Microcyn eliminates infection, can accelerate healing time and,
in some cases, reduces the use of systemic antibiotics, thereby
lowering overall patient cost.
|
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to become a worldwide leader in wound care by
establishing Microcyn as the standard of care for preventing and
eliminating infection in chronic and acute wounds throughout all
stages of treatment. We also intend to leverage our expertise in
wound care into additional market opportunities. The key
elements of our strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Drive adoption of Microcyn as the standard of care in the
wound care market to prevent and eliminate infection
|
We believe our products are well positioned to become the
standard of care in preventing and eliminating infection. We
seek to drive adoption of Microcyn as the standard of care in
the wound care market through data from physician clinical
studies, clinical trials and key opinion leader programs. We
intend to continue to maintain a marketing presence in key
medical communities throughout the world through targeted direct
marketing and sponsorships of physician presentations at medical
conferences and seminars.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Obtain additional regulatory approvals in the United
States
|
We intend to seek additional regulatory approvals, which we
believe will allow us to accelerate adoption of our products by
wound care specialists worldwide. In July 2006, we completed a
pivotal clinical trial for pre-operative skin preparation. The
FDA has requested an additional pivotal trial and additional
microbiology and dermatology studies. Before we initiate our
second pivotal trial, we plan to discuss with the FDA its
request for an additional pivotal trial and additional data.
Depending on the results of these discussions, we may reassess
our priorities, clinical timelines and schedules for filing the
NDA for pre-operative skin preparation. In the event that we
proceed with the second pivotal trial and assuming that the
second pivotal trial and the additional studies are successful,
we intend to file an NDA for use of Microcyn as a pre-operative
skin preparation in late 2007. In addition, we have developed a
protocol, based on comments from the FDA, for a Phase IIb
trial to be conducted in subjects with diabetic foot ulcers and
other open wounds comparing the healing time of wounds treated
with Microcyn with those
54
not treated with Microcyn. This clinical trial is intended to
support the safety as well as the efficacy of Microcyn for
infection control and wound healing.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Expand our direct sales force and distribution
networks
|
We intend to expand our direct sales force and distribution
networks in the United States, Europe and the rest of the world.
In the United States, Europe and Mexico, we sell our products
through distribution networks supported by our direct sales
force. We have distribution agreements for our products in
India, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. We select
distributors based on their demonstrated expertise in selling to
wound care professionals and facilities.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Pursue opportunities to combine Microcyn with other
treatments
|
We believe our products are compatible with and enhance the
efficacy of a variety of existing wound care treatment methods
including negative pressure wound therapy, pulse and jet lavage
and tissue engineered skin substitutes. Combining Microcyn with
these therapies has improved their effectiveness in eliminating
infection, as demonstrated in physician clinical studies. We
believe combination treatment methods to eliminate infection are
gaining acceptance by wound care professionals and may prove to
be clinically and commercially attractive.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Develop strategic collaborations in the wound care
market
|
We intend to pursue strategic relationships with respect to both
product development and distribution. To accelerate adoption of
our products, we may enter into strategic relationships with
healthcare companies that have product lines or distribution
channels that are complementary to ours. We believe
collaborations allow us to leverage our resources and
technology. These relationships may take the form of
co-promotion agreements, distribution agreements or joint
ventures. In addition, we may expand our offerings of new
products or technologies through acquisitions or licensing
agreements.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Leverage our Microcyn platform to address additional
markets
|
We believe our products have applications in several other large
consumer and professional markets, including the respiratory,
dermatology, veterinary, mold and atmospheric remediation, hard
surface disinfectant and dental markets. We intend to access
these markets through strategic partnerships or joint ventures.
To date, we have entered into distribution agreements in the
hard surface disinfectant, veterinarian and mold and atmospheric
remediation markets.
Our
Products — Microcyn Platform
All our current products are based on our Microcyn platform
technology. We are able to modify the chemistry of Microcyn by
changing the oxidation-reduction potential, pH-level and
concentrations of specific ions or chemicals, which allows us to
manufacture of a variety of solutions, each specifically
optimized for maximum efficacy and safety by indication. The
following are products we currently offer:
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
Brand Name
|
|
Approved Label
Indication
|
|
United States
|
|
Dermacyn Wound Care
|
|
A medical device product intended
for moistening absorbent wound dressings and cleaning minor
cuts, minor burns, superficial abrasions and minor irritations
of the skin, for moistening and lubricating absorbent wound
dressings for traumatic wounds, cuts, abrasions and minor burns,
and for moistening and debriding acute and chronic dermal
lesions, such as
stage I-IV
pressure ulcers, ulcers resulting from insufficient blood flow,
diabetic ulcers, post-surgical wounds, first and second degree
burns, abrasions and minor irritations of the skin.
|
|
|
Vetericyn Wound Care
|
|
A product used for the management
of traumatic wounds, cuts, abrasions, skin irritations,
post-surgical incisions and minor burns in animals. Safe for use
around head and eyes.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
Brand Name
|
|
Approved Label
Indication
|
|
European Union
|
|
Dermacyn Wound Care
|
|
A product intended for use in
debriding, irrigating and moistening acute and chronic wounds,
ulcers, cuts, abrasions and burns. Through reducing microbial
load and assisting in a moist environment, it enables the body
to perform its own healing process. It can be broadly applied
within a comprehensive wound treatment.
|
|
|
Oculus Microcyn Disinfectant
|
|
A high-level disinfectant solution
for the reprocessing of heat sensitive and other medical devices.
|
Mexico
|
|
Microcyn60*
|
|
A product used for the antiseptic
treatment of wounds and infected areas and for the disinfection
of medical instruments and equipment and clean-rooms.
|
India
|
|
Oxum
|
|
A product intended for use in the
cleaning and debriding, in wound management. Through reducing
microbial load and assisting in a moist environment, it enables
the body to perform its own healing process. It can be broadly
applied within a comprehensive wound treatment regimen.
|
Canada
|
|
Dermacyn Wound Care
|
|
A product used in moistening,
irrigating, cleansing and debriding acute and chronic dermal
lesions, such as
stage I-IV
pressure ulcers, ulcers resulting from insufficient blood flow,
diabetic ulcers, post-surgical wounds, first and second degree
burns, abrasions, lacerations and minor irritations of the skin.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
We may stop using the name Microcyn60 in Mexico as a result of
ongoing litigation.
|
In October 2004, we received EPA approval for a hospital
disinfectant called Cidalcyn. In August 2006, we received a
“show cause” letter from the EPA, which states that in
tests conducted by the EPA, Cidalcyn was found to be ineffective
in killing certain strains of specified pathogens when used
according to label directions. In a second letter, the EPA
stated it was prepared to issue a civil administrative complaint
against us. We are currently conducting a voluntary withdrawal
of Cidalcyn from the market as we seek to resolve the issue with
the EPA. For additional information, please see “Risk
Factors — Microcyn may be ineffective as a high level
disinfectant in killing certain strains of pathogens under
current Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, testing
protocols. We have discontinued marketing our Cidalcyn
disinfectant in response to concerns raised by the EPA based on
testing performed on this product.’’
Mechanism
of Action
We believe Microcyn’s ability to prevent and eliminate
infection is based on its uniquely engineered chemistry.
Laboratory studies conducted on Microcyn show that it reduces
various bacteria, spores, fungi and viruses. Unlike current
treatments, physician clinical studies indicate that Microcyn
does not cause adverse effects on human tissue. We believe this
is due to the specialized combination of oxidizing chemical
species produced through our proprietary process of
electrolyzation. Our laboratory studies suggest that Microcyn
reacts with and damages the cell wall of the organism, causing
rupture of the cell. Laboratory and physician clinical studies
suggest that this process destroys only single cell organisms
such as bacteria, spores, fungi and viruses.
This rupture of the cell wall appears to occur through a
fundamentally different process than that which occurs as a
result of contact with a chlorine-based solution because
experiments have confirmed that Microcyn kills
chlorine-resistant bacteria.
In laboratory tests, Microcyn has been shown to eliminate
certain biofilms. A biofilm is a complex aggregation of
microorganisms or bacteria marked by the formation of a
protective and adhesive matrix, allowing the bacteria to collect
and proliferate. It is estimated that over 65% of microbial
infections in the
56
body involve bacteria growing as a biofilm. Bacteria living in
a biofilm typically have significantly different properties from
free-floating bacteria of the same species. One result of this
film environment is increased resistance to antibiotics and to
the body’s immune system. In chronic wounds, biofilms
interfere with the normal healing process and halt or slow wound
closure. In our laboratory studies, Microcyn was shown to
destroy two common biofilms after five minutes of exposure.
It is widely accepted that reducing inflammation surrounding an
injury or wound is beneficial to wound healing. Our laboratory
research indicates that Microcyn inhibits histamine production
and cytokine release from mast cells. These factors are critical
components of the body’s natural inflammatory response to
injury or wounds, as well as other conditions, such as
rhinosinusitis. Inhibition of cytokine release blocks the
initial stages of the inflammation process, in which cells,
including mast cells, involved in triggering the inflammatory
response are prevented from releasing the inflammation signal to
the rest of the body. Our laboratory research suggests that
Microcyn’s interference with these cells is selective to
only the inflammation response and does not interfere with other
functions of these cells. Additionally, physician clinical
studies suggest that Microcyn only inhibits this function in
tissue that is directly exposed to the solution.
Clinical
Trials
Pre-Operative Skin Preparation Trial.
In
September 2005, we initiated a pivotal pre-operative skin
preparation trial using 64 healthy volunteers. Patients were
selected for enrollment based on the presence of a baseline
microbial load in specific areas of the body and received a
Microcyn scrub in the same manner as preparation for surgery.
The patients were evaluated for microbial load reduction at
intervals throughout the day.
The volunteers were screened to ensure that each had a
sufficient level of bacteria count on the groin and abdominal
sites. The application of the Microcyn, Hibiclens and saline was
randomized so that each patient had two of the three
alternatives on a possible four sites per person. The amount of
bacteria per square centimeter was measured initially to
determine the baseline level. Then the amount of bacteria on the
groin and abdominal sites were measured again after 30 seconds,
10 minutes and six hours. The trial was conducted by a
third party laboratory that has completed numerous similar
studies with other pre-operative skin preparation products. The
trial was completed in July 2006.
We met with the FDA on August 8, 2006 concerning this
pivotal trial, and the FDA requested completion of a second
pivotal trial with the same design, size and endpoints as the
prior one to confirm the results. We expect that this second
pivotal trial will take approximately four months to
complete. In addition, the FDA indicated that several additional
studies would be required to test safety, ability to kill
resistant bacterial strains and the chemistry of Microcyn. We
plan to discuss with the FDA its request for an additional
pivotal trial and additional data. Depending on the results of
these discussions, we may reassess our priorities, clinical
timelines and schedules for filing the NDA for pre-operative
skin preparation.
Open Wound Trial.
We have drafted a Phase IIb
clinical trial protocol to conduct a randomized, multicenter,
double-blind, placebo controlled trial of the safety and
efficacy of Dermacyn as an adjunctive treatment to antimicrobial
therapy in complicated skin and skin structure infections. We
designed this trial to demonstrate clinical efficacy and
microbiological response to Dermacyn compared to treatments
other than Microcyn. Our intent is to study a wide range of
complicated skin and skin structure infections, including
diabetic foot infections, pressure ulcers, and post-operative
abdominal infections. The number and types of infections will be
determined by patient enrollment at the various sites. We have
received comments from the FDA regarding our proposed Phase IIb
protocol and we plan to discuss these comments and finalize the
trial design elements of the protocol with clinical and
regulatory experts before initiating the trial. The results of
this Phase IIb trial will be used to determine the design and
sample sizes for subsequent Phase III trials. These Phase IIb
and Phase III clinical trials are intended to provide the
clinical basis for submission of an NDA for wound closure with
the FDA.
Depending upon our analysis of the time and expense involved, we
may choose to license our technology to a third-party as opposed
to pursuing commercialization ourselves.
57
Physician
Clinical Studies
Physicians in the United States, Europe and Mexico have
conducted twelve clinical studies of Microcyn, some sponsored by
us and some physician initiated, generating data indicating that
Microcyn is safe and effective for the indications under study
and that it results in reduced costs to healthcare providers and
patients.
Since there is not one universal standard of care in wound
treatment, healthcare providers use many different devices,
antiseptics, bandages and antibiotics to treat various types of
wounds. For example, in the United States, a typical protocol
for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers includes treatment with
saline solution or topical antibiotics as an infection control
agent, whereas the typical protocol for diabetic foot ulcers in
Europe often includes treatment with Betadine. Efforts to change
formal or favored protocols meet with resistance unless clear
evidence of greater safety, superior efficacy, reduction in
cost, or other benefits is demonstrated.
Dr. David E. Allie, a cardiovascular surgeon and head
of the Cardiovascular Institute of the South in Lafayette,
Louisiana and a member of our Medical and Business Advisory
Board, completed a retrospective study in January 2006 comparing
the use of Microcyn on 60 patients to a comparable matched
control group. Dr. Allie was given an unrestricted research
grant of $36,000 and we paid his expenses, including travel,
hotels, meals and honorarium of $2,000, to attend medical
conferences to present his findings. We also provided Dr. Allie
with all the Microcyn necessary to complete this study. The
study was designed to examine the effect on wound healing, limb
salvage and skin irritation. The results of this study showed
improvements in wound healing time and in rates of limb salvage.
Furthermore, the Microcyn group experienced no skin
irritationwhile 13% of the patients in the control group did
experience skin irritation. The following is a summary of those
results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microcyn
|
|
|
Traditional
|
|
|
Number of patients
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Percentage of limb salvage
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
Adverse effects / complications
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8 (13
|
)%
|
Average wound healing time
|
|
|
34 days
|
|
|
|
67 days
|
|
Dr. Luca Dalla Paola, an endocrinologist and surgeon and
Chief of the Diabetic Foot Unit of Presidio Ospedaliero Abano
Terme in Padova, Italy and a member of our Medical and Business
Advisory Board, conducted a controlled physician clinical study
in Italy in November 2004 designed to assess the rate of
elimination of infection when Microcyn was used on diabetic foot
ulcers localized below the ankle. Although we did not compensate
Dr. Dalla Paola for this study, we did pay his expenses,
including travel, hotels and meals, to attend medical
conferences to present his findings and provided him with all
the Microcyn necessary to complete this study. In the study,
patients were treated daily using gauze soaked with Microcyn or
Betadine. Microbiological specimens were taken at the time of
the enrollment and weekly thereafter until wound closure
occurred. The results showed that patients treated with Microcyn
had less than one-third the strains of bacteria than those
treated with Betadine. The following table summarizes the
results of the study:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microcyn
|
|
|
Betadine
|
|
|
P-Value
|
|
|
Number of patients
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bacteria strains at beginning of
study
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strains after treatment
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
p<0.001
|
|
Percentage eliminated
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse effects / complications
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average wound healing time
|
|
|
43 days
|
|
|
|
55 days
|
|
|
|
p<0.0001
|
|
Dr. Alfredo Barrera, a gastrointestinal surgeon and head of
the Department of Surgery at the Hospital Ruben Leñoro,
Mexico, conducted a six-month controlled physician clinical
study in Mexico in 2004. We paid Dr. Barrera $6,000 of the
$12,000 due to him in connection with this study and we paid his
expenses, including travel, hotels and meals, to attend medical
conferences to present his findings. We also provided
58
Dr. Barrera with all the Microcyn necessary to complete
this study. The study was designed to test microbial load
reduction in patients with extensive abdominal peritonitis. In
this study, patients were given a comprehensive therapy using
saline solution lavage plus Microcyn or given the same
comprehensive therapy with saline solution only, a widely used
standard of care. Patients treated with Microcyn experienced
greater microbial load reduction and shorter hospital stays. The
following table summarizes the results of the study:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microcyn
|
|
|
Saline
|
|
|
Number of patients
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Bacteria strains at beginning of
study
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Bacteria strains after treatment
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Percentage of bacteria strains
eliminated
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Adverse effect / complications
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Average hospital stay
|
|
|
22 days
|
|
|
|
33 days
|
|
Dr. Ariel Miranda, a board certified plastic surgeon and
Chief of the Burn Unit of the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara,
Mexico, conducted a retrospective clinical study in Mexico in
2004, using Microcyn on pediatric burn patients. We paid Dr.
Miranda approximately $40,450 in connection with this study,
including travel, hotels and meals, to attend medical
conferences to present his findings. We also provided Dr.
Miranda with all the Microcyn necessary to complete this study.
The study was designed to evaluate the rate of infection, the
need for skin grafts and antibiotics, and the duration of
hospital stays in pediatric burn patients. In this study,
Dr. Miranda used Microcyn for initial debridement and to
moisten the burn site for 5-15 minutes, three times a day
until elimination of the infection. No gels or dressings were
applied to the wound. An independent statistician reviewed and
analyzed the results of this study and compared it to the
results from burn patients treated by Dr. Miranda with
silver sulfadiazine. The patients treated with Microcyn suffered
no adverse effects or related complications. In addition, the
use of Microcyn enabled Dr. Miranda to reduce the use of
systemic antibiotics without the development of infections.
Dr. Miranda also noted that, due to the flexible and smooth
quality of the healed skin, the patients treated with Microcyn
needed less skin grafting. The following table summarizes the
results of the independent statistician’s analysis of the
study:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microcyn
|
|
|
Silver Sulfadiazine
|
|
|
Number of patients
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Patients with bacteria strains
after 7 to 15 days
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Patients on antibiotics
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Adverse effects / complications
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Average hospital stay
|
|
|
15 days
|
|
|
|
29 days
|
|
Nine additional physician clinical studies in the United States,
Europe and Mexico have been completed using Microcyn to
eliminate infection in a variety of different wounds, including
diabetic foot and venous stasis ulcers and oral surgery.
In addition, there are several ongoing and planned physician
clinical studies being conducted in the United States and Europe
to assess Microcyn’s effectiveness in preventing and
eliminating infection in wounds. For example, we are supporting
with a research grant of $100,000 a study by Dr. David
Armstrong of the Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine in
Chicago, Illinois and Dr. Andrew Boulton, Head of the
Manchester Diabetes Centre at the Manchester Royal Infirmary in
the United Kingdom. This is a study of diabetic foot ulcers
using the VersaJet, an aggressive debridement system, in two
groups of 20 patients each, one utilizing Microcyn and the
other utilizing saline. The endpoints are microbial load
reduction and time to complete wound healing. Dr. Dalla
Paola is conducting a study involving 100 patients
comparing Microcyn to another antimicrobial agent in the
treatment of diabetic foot necrobiosis, with time to wound
healing the primary endpoint. We have given Dr. Tom Wolvos,
a board certified surgeon who is the Medical Director at the
Scottsdale Healthcare Wound Management Center in Arizona, an
unrestricted research grant of $36,000 to conduct a 40 patient
study comparing Microcyn to saline solution with the VAC, a
negative pressure wound
59
therapy system, in the treatment of a variety of wounds.
Lastly, Cheryl Bongiovanni, Ph.D., Director of the Lake
Wound Clinics in Lakeview, Oregon, is conducting two patient
studies focusing on both the potential savings from the use of
Microcyn in treating a variety of wounds as well as a
20 patient study comparing Microcyn with saline solution in
the treatment of leg ulcers. We provided each of these doctors
with Microcyn and may pay their expenses, including travel,
hotels and meals, to attend medical conferences to present their
findings. We have also paid approximately $37,600 in consulting
fees and expenses to Dr. Wolvos in connection with
corporate development and licensing evaluations.
In addition, Drs. Allie and Dalla Paola are members of our
Medical and Business Advisory Board. Dr. Dalla Paola is
compensated $1,000 per month for his participation on this
Board. Dr. Allie is a paid consultant, investor and
stockholder. For additional information, please see
“Management - Advisory Board Compensation.”
Regulatory
Strategy
Our regulatory strategy is to seek the necessary clearances and
approvals for Microcyn to accelerate its adoption by wound care
specialists worldwide as the standard of care in preventing and
eliminating infection throughout all stages of treatment. We
intend to seek and obtain FDA approval of Microcyn as a topical
antimicrobial to treat infected wounds. We completed a pivotal
pre-operative skin trial using 64 healthy volunteers in the
third quarter of 2006. The FDA has requested an additional
pivotal trial and microbiology and dermatology studies. We plan
to discuss with the FDA its request for an additional pivotal
trial and additional studies. Depending on the results of these
discussions, we may reassess our priorities, clinical timelines
and schedule for filing a NDA for pre-operative skin
preparation. In the event that we proceed with the second
pivotal trial, and assuming that the second pivotal trial and
the additional studies are successful, we intend to file an NDA
for the use of Microcyn as a pre-operative skin preparation in
late 2007. Concurrently, we intend to apply for similar or
expanded clearances in Europe and other parts of the world.
In addition, we have developed a protocol, based on comments
from the FDA, for a Phase IIb trial to be conducted in
subjects with a wide range of complicated skin and skin
structure infections, including diabetic foot infections,
pressure ulcers and post operative abdominal infections
comparing the healing time of wounds treated with Microcyn with
those not treated with Microcyn. We plan to discuss the protocol
with the FDA and finalize the trial design elements of the
protocol with clinical and regulatory experts before initiating
the trial. The results of this Phase IIb trial will be used
to determine the design and sample sizes for subsequent
Phase III trials. This clinical trial is intended to
support the safety as well as the efficacy of Microcyn in terms
of rate of clinical cure and wound healing. The Phase IIb
and Phase III clinical trials are intended to provide the
clinical basis for submission of an NDA for wound closure for
the FDA.
Depending upon our analysis of the time and expense involved, we
may choose to license our technology to a third-party as opposed
to pursuing commercialization ourselves.
In November 2004, we received CE Mark approval to market and
sell Microcyn in Europe as a wound care product as part of a
comprehensive wound care treatment for microbial load reduction.
We have obtained three 510(k) clearances for Microcyn as a
medical device for moistening, cleansing, lubricating and
debriding acute and chronic dermal lesions, such as
stage IV pressure ulcers, stasis ulcers, diabetic ulcers,
post-surgical wounds, first and second degree burns, abrasions
and minor irritations of the skin. Based on the CE Mark and FDA
approvals, we filed for and received clearance to market
Microcyn in India, Singapore and Pakistan.
Sales and
Marketing
We are developing distribution and sales networks to market our
products in the United States and Europe. We expect to expand
our existing sales force in the United States, Europe and Mexico
as we obtain additional regulatory claims. Our products are
purchased by hospitals, physicians, nurses and other healthcare
practitioners who are the primary caregivers to patients being
treated for acute or chronic wounds as well as those patients
undergoing surgical procedures.
60
Our strategy is to enter into agreements with established
regional distributors, provide ongoing sales support and utilize
clinical studies and key opinion leader programs to accelerate
product adoption. Implementation of our strategy includes the
development of relationships with wound care specialists through
targeted direct marketing and communications programs and
through sponsorship of physician presentations at medical
conferences and seminars.
In the United States, we currently distribute our products
through one national and five regional distributors and are
actively recruiting additional distributors. We employ medical
and clinical professionals, in addition to our distributors,
with marketing contacts in leading wound care clinics, hospitals
and health care agencies that provide wound care services. We
intend to hire additional salespeople in the United States in
connection with the anticipated the FDA approval of our product
for pre-operative skin preparation and additional indications.
Our products may be used by physicians and patients for uses
other than those approved by regulatory authorities. Although
the FDA does not regulate the practice of medicine, it does
restrict our communications and activities with respect to
off-label use.
In Europe, we have distribution arrangements in Germany, Italy,
Sweden and the Czech Republic with an aggregate of over
25 full-time equivalent salespeople focused on the sale of
Microcyn and are actively pursuing additional distribution
arrangements in other European countries. We currently have a
seven-person direct sales force in our European regional sales
office in The Netherlands, and intend to hire additional direct
sales people to support our distributors.
In Mexico, we market our products through our established
distribution network and direct sales organization. We have a
dedicated 75-person sales force, including salespeople, nurses
and clinical support staff responsible for selling Microcyn to
over 250 private and public hospitals and to retail independent
pharmacies.
We have established distributors for our disinfectant and wound
care products in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Singapore, United
Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. In December 2005, we entered
into a distribution agreement with Alkem Laboratories, a large,
privately-held pharmaceutical firm headquartered in Mumbai,
India, employing more than 800 salespeople servicing the Indian
healthcare market. In January 2006, the Indian Ministry of
Health approved Microcyn for use in chronic and acute wounds,
and we commenced sales to Alkem in April 2006.
In October 2004, we received regulatory approval to use Microcyn
as a wound cleanser from the Medical Device Bureau of Health
Canada. In order to obtain a drug identification number from the
Therapeutic Products Directorate we must conduct additional
clinical trials. We currently expect to complete these clinical
trials and have our application for a drug identification number
to be reviewed in 2008. We plan to recruit wound care specialty
distributors and expect to commence product sales following
receipt of our drug identification number. Sales in Canada are
currently supported by one employee.
Other
Market Opportunities
We believe our products have applications in several other large
consumer and professional markets and intend to access these
markets through strategic partnerships or joint ventures. We
have entered into distribution or license agreements in some of
these markets; however, we have not generated meaningful revenue
from any of these agreements. In addition, we plan to develop
new applications of our products in the respiratory, dermatology
and oral care markets. These markets opportunities include:
Respiratory
Our nasal product candidate is an anti-microbial solution
designed to be self-administered into a patient’s nasal
cavity for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis, or
inflammation of the nasal sinuses. In animal studies, Microcyn
has been shown to kill the bacteria that causes rhinosinusitis.
We are currently conducting pre-clinical animal studies seeking
to support efficacy and safety and intend to seek FDA approval
once clinical trials are successfully completed for this product
candidate and indication.
61
Rhinosinusitis affects an estimated 35 million people in
the United States. There is no FDA-approved therapy for
chronic rhinosinusitis. Most treatment methods have focused on
the symptoms of the disease and include the use of antibiotics,
antihistamines, corticosteroids and sinus surgery.
Dermatology
We are developing dermatology-focused product candidates using
our Microcyn technology for the treatment of various fungal and
bacterial skin infections, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Acne vulgaris, a common skin disease affecting 85% of
adolescents and young adults;
|
|
|
•
|
Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting more
than 4.0 million Americans;
|
|
|
•
|
Vaginal candidiasis, an infection usually caused by a species of
the yeast Candida albicans, affecting approximately 75% of women
at least once in their lifetime; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Onychomycosis, a fungal infection of the toenail that may affect
approximately 30 million people in North America.
|
Our dermatology product candidates will be administered in a
liquid suspension and a gel formulation. In laboratory and
clinical tests, our anti-fungal product candidates were
effective in treating fungal infections without the need for
long-term exposure to systemic antibiotics. We intend to seek
FDA approval to sell our dermatology products by prescription
and
over-the-counter.
Veterinary
Medicine
Our animal wound care product, Vetericyn, was launched in late
2004 and is currently available for purchase by veterinarians
through MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., a distributor of animal
health products. Vetericyn has uses in a variety of
applications, including, for example, to treat hard-to-heal
equine wounds. We believe a non-toxic wound spray or gel that is
safe for use in animals has wide application. According to the
American Veterinary Medical Association, as of December 31,
2005, there were more than 54,000 veterinarians in private
practice in more than 27,000 veterinary practices nationwide.
Mold
and Atmospheric Remediation
We plan to commercialize our Microcyn technology in liquid and
mist form for the industrial and residential remediation
markets. Tests have shown that our Microcyn products are
non-irritating and non-sensitizing to humans and yet contain
ingredients with potent kill times. Our products are safe,
non-corrosive, non-flammable and easy to use, requiring no
significant training or experience. In addition, unlike other
competitive products, Microcyn does not need to be removed after
application, thereby saving time and labor costs. Our Microcyn
products have been granted the lowest class EPA toxicity rating
and are therefore safe to use to remediate mold and other
household and industrial damage due to flooding.
Recent scientific data suggests an association between exposure
to mold or damp indoor environments and the development of cough
and upper respiratory tract symptoms, wheezing, and asthma
symptoms in sensitized persons.
In July 2005, we entered into a license agreement with a
provider of restoration and remediation services in Canada, for
the restoration of residential, commercial, industrial and
business property damaged by fire, flood and wind. We expect to
begin commercializing this product following receipt of our drug
identification number from the Therapeutic Products
Directorates. We expect our application for a drug
identification number to be reviewed in late 2006.
Hard
Surface Disinfectant
In the United States, we obtained EPA clearance for use of the
Microcyn technology as a disinfectant in May 2004. Our product,
Cidalcyn, is a multi-purpose disinfectant cleaner intended for
use in patient care
62
areas, households, child care facilities, health clubs,
laboratories where cross-contamination of treated surfaces can
occur.
Disinfectants currently in the marketplace, such as bleach and
ammonia, may have adverse effects for the person applying the
disinfectant after extended use, and there are other
environmental, biodegradability and general concerns regarding
toxicity. Most leading brands of disinfectant products are
classified by the EPA as having a high level of toxicity and
require appropriate warning statements. Based on the EPA
toxicity categorization of antimicrobial products, Cidalcyn
received the lowest toxicity rating and, as a result,
precautionary labeling statements are not required.
We stated on Cidalcyn’s label that it was effective in
eliminating certain strains of bacteria, the HIV virus and
certain fungi. In July 2006, we received a “show
cause” letter from the EPA, which stated that, in tests
conducted by the EPA, Cidalcyn was found to be ineffective in
killing certain specified pathogens (pseudomones aerginose,
staphylococus aureus and mycobacterium tuberculosis) when used
according to label directions. Our subsequent testing has
confirmed two of the three EPA results. We believe our product
failed EPA testing because of changes in the EPA’s testing
methods since receiving our original clearance. Currently, EPA
testing requires a higher bacterial concentration embedded in
the coating material than previously required by EPA for testing
Cidalcyn.
The current EPA test method uses an organic material as a
coating for the bacteria. This coating, which does not naturally
occur in most environments in which Microcyn is used, is
generally not present in wound environments and is difficult to
penetrate. We believe that due to the non-toxic nature of
Microcyn and its mode of action, when our product comes in
contact with the coating material, our product is neutralized
before reaching the bacteria. Consequently, the effectiveness of
Microcyn in killing certain pathogens is reduced.
Based on its results, the EPA strongly recommended that we
immediately recall all Cidalcyn distributed on and after
September 28, 2005. Accordingly, we have commenced a
voluntary recall of Cidalcyn. Although we have not marketed
Cidalcyn on a large commercial scale, we have provided it in
small quantities to numerous hospitals for use in product
evaluation exercises. In a second letter, the EPA stated it
intended to file a civil administrative complaint against us for
violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act, or FIFRA. Under FIFRA, the EPA could assess civil penalties
related to the sale and distribution of a pesticide product not
meeting the label’s claims as a broad-spectrum hospital
disinfectant. We believe that such civil penalties could be up
to $200,000. The EPA could also cause us to stop selling our
product, or require us to remove it from the market. As a result
of the EPA action, there will be no further sales in the United
States of Cidalcyn unless and until we modify our label claims
of Cidalcyn to the EPA’s acceptance.
In December 2005, we entered into an exclusive distribution
agreement with a manufacturer of wet wipes and moist towelette
products for the consumer, food service and healthcare
industries. The distribution agreement allows our distributor to
market, sell and distribute our hard-surface disinfectant
products under the distributor’s private label in the
United States, Canada, the Caribbean and Latin America,
excluding Mexico. Unless and until we reach resolution with the
EPA, we will not be able to sell our Cidalcyn product under this
agreement.
Dental
and Oral Care
We are developing an oral rinse and antimicrobial toothpaste for
the oral care market. Based on data from the Freedonia Group,
the United States market for mouthwash and dental rinse
products was $600 million in 2003. Our oral rinse product
candidate is expected to compete with consumer oral rinses, such
as Listerine, Scope and Cepacol and prescription rinses, such as
Peridex and Perigard. Our Microcyn oral rinse product candidate
has been tested in physician studies and shown to be safe for
use in oral surgery. We intend to seek FDA approval to market
our dental and oral care product either by prescription or
over-the-counter as FDA designates.
63
Research
and Development
The main goals of our research and development program are to
design, develop and produce products to treat acute and chronic
wounds, and to identify new applications for our technology. We
are also continuing research and development activities related
to a compound that may have applications in certain cancers. Our
research and development efforts with our Microcyn-based
products are divided into three areas: science, new product
development and engineering.
Our scientists work to continually improve our product
performance by evaluating variations of the formulations and
chemical structures of our products. For example, we are
evaluating alterations to Microcyn to increase the speed at
which it kills certain bacteria and viruses.
The focus of our current development efforts is new
formulations, applications and delivery systems for Microcyn,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
an intravenous bag and spikeable bottle for use with compatible
wound care systems, such as negative wound pressure therapy, jet
lavage and oxygenated mist devices;
|
|
|
•
|
an antimicrobial gel formulation that hydrates, moistens and
protects the wound;
|
|
|
•
|
various formulations and delivery systems that extend the
stability of the product;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
an oral rinse to treat ulcerations of oral tissues, or
stomatitis, and inflammation of oral tissues, or mucositis;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
an antimicrobial toothpaste that reduces plaque and gingivitis
and will not be irritating to the mouth;
|
|
|
•
|
a surgical irrigant to control infections during and after
surgery; and
|
|
|
•
|
a fine mist to treat chronic rhinosinusitis;
|
Our engineers seek to optimize our manufacturing process by
reducing costs and increasing yield. For example, we have
significantly decreased the waste product resulting from our
manufacturing process, and we continue to experiment to find
ways of decreasing it further.
We also intend to develop other products for use in non-medical
markets based on our core technology and intellectual property
portfolio. These potential products include the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
a solution used with various materials in the manufacture of
disinfectant wipe products;
|
|
|
•
|
a mist form of Microcyn used for decontaminating environmental
areas containing potential biological hazards, such as in
aircraft decontamination; and
|
|
|
•
|
a mist used to decontaminate people exposed to biological
hazardous agents.
|
We also intend to devote attention to our L3 compound, which our
research has shown to be a cell cycle inhibitor and anti-viral
molecule, for the treatment of human papilloma virus, which
causes cervical dysplasia. Based on our research, L3 has
inhibited the growth of certain cancer cells both in vitro and
in vivo. Our research also has shown that the L3 compound
prevents cell growth in various cell types including melanoma,
breast cancer and small lung carcinomas. Given the large
population of cervical cancer patients in Latin America, and the
authorization of a division of the MOH in Mexico to conduct a
Phase I clinical trial, we expect to begin treating
cervical dysplasia as L3’s first clinical indication with
Phase I of a clinical trial in Mexico City. We may use the
results in Mexico as safety data for future filings in the
United States and in Europe.
As of August 31, 2006, we had 11 full-time employees
engaged in research and development activities. Our director of
research and development coordinates all such activities. We
plan to increase our research and development staff in the
future to address market demands identified in our direct market
research and to expand our product line by using our Microcyn
technology in different medical and non-medical applications.
Manufacturing
We manufacture Microcyn through a proprietary electrolysis
process within a multi-chamber system. We are able to control
the passage of ions through proprietary membranes, yielding
electrolyzed water with only
64
trace amounts of chlorine. This process is fundamentally
different from the processes for manufacturing hydrogen peroxide
and bleach and is the basis for our technology’s efficacy
and safety.
We manufacture our products in Petaluma, California, Sittard,
The Netherlands and Zapopan, Mexico. We have developed an
automated manufacturing process and conduct quality assurance
testing on each production batch in accordance with current
U.S. Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP. Our
manufacturing process produces very little waste, which is
disposed of as water after a simple non-toxic chemical
treatment. Our facilities are required to meet and maintain
regulatory standards applicable to the manufacture of products.
Our United States and Netherlands facilities are certified and
comply with cGMP guidelines. Our Mexico facility has been
approved by the MOH.
Our machines are subjected to a series of tests, which is part
of a validation protocol mandated by cGMP and ISO requirements.
This validation is designed to ensure that the final product is
manufactured with the same level of consistency and quality in
all manufacturing sites, and includes the testing of all
internal and external components, mechanical and electrical
parts and the software in each machine. Slight deviations in
our manufacturing process, including quality control, labeling
and packaging, could lead to a failure to meet the
specifications required by the FDA, EPA, European notified
bodies and Mexican regulatory agencies, which may result in lot
failures or product recalls. Certain materials used in
manufacturing our machines are proprietary.
We believe we have a sufficient number of machines to produce
Microcyn as required to meet anticipated future requirements for
at least the next two years. As we expand into other geographic
markets, we may establish additional manufacturing facilities in
or near new markets.
Intellectual
Property
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and
maintain proprietary protection for our product technology and
know-how, to operate without infringing proprietary rights of
others, and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary
rights. We seek to protect our proprietary position by, among
other methods, filing, when possible, U.S. and foreign patent
applications relating to our technology, inventions and
improvements that are important to our business. We also rely on
trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation,
and in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our
proprietary position.
In March 2003, we obtained an exclusive license to six
issued Japanese patents and five Japanese published pending
patent applications owned by Coherent Technologies, or Coherent.
The issued Japanese patents and pending Japanese patent
applications relate to an early generation of super-oxidized
water product and aspects of the method and apparatus for
producing Microcyn and will expire between 2011 and 2014. In
June 2006, we received written notice from Coherent
advising us that the patent license was terminated, citing
various reasons with which we disagree. Although we do not
believe Coherent has grounds to terminate the license, we may
have to take legal action to preserve our rights under the
license and to enjoin Coherent from breaching its terms. We do
not know whether we would prevail in any such action, which
would be costly and time consuming, and we could lose our rights
under the license, which could have a material adverse impact on
our business opportunities in Japan. In addition, we may have to
defend ourselves against infringement claims from Coherent in
Japan based on their position on termination of the license. We
do not believe the Japanese patents disclose or cover certain
innovations in our products, which we developed independently
and are the subject of our own patent applications.
As of August 29, 2006, we had one issued U.S. patent, 12
pending U.S. patent applications and 18 foreign pending patent
applications generally relating to super-oxidized water. These
applications include three U.S. provisional applications
for which the one-year period to file a non-provisional
application has not yet expired as well as three international
PCT applications that have not yet reached the deadline to file
counterpart phase applications. We filed the provisional U.S.
patent applications as a way of deferring the payment of U.S.
and foreign patent office fees while we decide whether the
invention merits a full examination based on the development of
the market for the product. In addition, a provisional patent
application gives us the opportunity to continue to develop the
inventive concepts further before filing further U.S. and
foreign patent applications that are subject to examination. Our
portfolio of pending applications can be divided into
65
two groups. The first group includes one U.S. issued patent and
three pending U.S. patent applications and seven foreign patent
applications that relate to early generation super-oxidized
water product, methods of using super-oxidized water, and
aspects of the method and apparatus for manufacturing
super-oxidized water. The second group includes nine pending
U.S. patent applications, including three provisional
applications, and 11 foreign patent applications that
relate to Microcyn, the method and apparatus for manufacturing
Microcyn, and its uses.
Although we work to protect our technology, we cannot assure you
that any patent will issue from currently pending patent
applications or from future patent applications. We also cannot
assure you that the scope of any patent protection will exclude
competitors or provide competitive advantages to us, that any of
our patents will be held valid if subsequently challenged, or
that others will not claim rights in or ownership of our patents
and proprietary rights. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that
others have not developed or will develop similar products,
duplicate any of our products or design around our patents.
We have also filed for trademark protection for marks used with
our Microcyn products in each of the United States, Europe,
certain countries in Central and South America, including Mexico
and Brazil, Latin America, certain countries in Asia, including
Japan, China and the Republic of Korea, and Australia.
In addition to patents and trademarks, we rely on trade secret
and other intellectual property laws, nondisclosure agreements
and other measures to protect our intellectual property rights.
We believe that in order to have a competitive advantage, we
must develop and maintain the proprietary aspects of our
technologies. We require our employees, consultants and advisors
to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their
employment, consulting or advisory relationship with us. We also
require our employees, consultants and advisors who we expect to
work on our products to agree to disclose and assign to us all
inventions made in the course of our working relationship with
them, while using our property or which relate to our business.
Despite any measures taken to protect our intellectual property,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products
or to wrongfully obtain or use information that we regard as
proprietary.
Competition
We believe the principal competitive factors in our target
market include improved patient outcomes, such as time in the
hospital, healing time, adverse events, safety of products, ease
of use, stability, spore killing and cost effectiveness. The
medical device industry, and in particular the wound care
market, is highly competitive. We compete with a number of large
well-established and well-funded companies that sell a broad
range of wound care products, including topical anti-infectives
and antibiotics, as well as some advanced wound technologies,
such as skin substitutes, growth factors and sophisticated
delayed release silver-based dressings. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.,
Smith & Nephew plc, Johnson & Johnson,
Healthpoint, Ltd., a subsidiary of DFB Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
Kendall, a division of Tyco International Ltd., ConvaTec, a
division of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Coloplast Ltd. have
a wide range of product offerings for the wound market.
Collectively, these companies have a substantial share of the
wound care market. Several large well-funded drug companies also
develop and sell topical antibiotics.
Our competitors enjoy several competitive advantages, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
significantly greater name recognition;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
established relationships with healthcare professionals,
patients and third party payors;
|
|
|
•
|
established distribution networks;
|
|
|
•
|
additional product lines and the ability to offer rebates or
bundle products to offer discounts or incentives;
|
|
|
•
|
greater experience in conducting research and development,
manufacturing, obtaining regulatory approval for products and
marketing; and
|
66
|
|
|
|
•
|
greater financial and human resources for product development,
sales and marketing and patient support.
|
While many companies are able to produce oxidized water, their
products, unlike ours, are typically stable for not more than
48 hours, have an acidic pH, which irritates the skin and
has a much higher chlorine content. One such company, PuriCore,
sells electrolysis machines used to manufacture brine-based
oxidized water primarily as a sterilant.
Our products compete with a large number of products that
include
over-the-counter
treatments and prescription drugs, including topical
anti-infectives, such as Betadine, silver sulfadiazine, hydrogen
peroxide, Dakin’s solution and hypochlorous acid, and
topical antibiotics, such as Neosporine and Bacitracin.
Currently, no single anti-infective product dominates the
chronic or acute wound markets because many of the products have
serious limitations or tend to inhibit the wound healing process.
Our products can also replace the use of sterile saline for
debriding and moistening a dressing as well as for use as a
complementary product with many advanced wound care
technologies, such as the VAC from Kinetic Concepts Inc., skin
substitute products from Smith & Nephew, Integra Life
Sciences, Life Cell, Organogenesis and Ortec International, and
ultrasound from Celleration. We believe that Microcyn can
enhance the effectiveness of many of these advanced wound care
technologies. Because Microcyn is competitive with some of the
large wound care companies’ products and complementary to
others, we may compete with such companies in some product lines
and complement other product lines.
Government
Regulation
Government authorities in the United States at the federal,
state and local levels and foreign countries extensively
regulate, among other things, the research, development,
testing, manufacture, labeling, promotion, advertising,
distribution, sampling, marketing, and import and export of
pharmaceutical products, biologics and medical devices. All of
our products in development will require regulatory approval by
government agencies prior to commercialization. In particular,
human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous pre-clinical
and clinical trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and
similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various
federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations also
govern testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and
record-keeping related to such products and their marketing. The
process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent process
of maintaining substantial compliance with appropriate federal,
state, local, and foreign statutes and regulations require the
expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. In
addition, statutes, rules, regulations and policies may change
and new legislation or regulations may be issued that could
delay such approvals.
Medical
Device Regulation
New medical devices, such as Microcyn, are subject to FDA
approval and extensive regulation under the FDCA. Under the
FDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes:
Class I, Class II or Class III. The
classification of a device into one of these three classes
generally depends on the degree of risk associated with the
medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure safety
and effectiveness.
Class I devices are those for which safety and
effectiveness can be assured by adherence to a set of general
controls. These general controls include compliance with the
applicable portions of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation,
which sets forth good manufacturing practice requirements;
facility registration and product reporting of adverse medical
events listing; truthful and non-misleading labeling; and
promotion of the device only for its cleared or approved
intended uses. Class II devices are also subject to these
general controls, and any other special controls as deemed
necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of
the device. Review and clearance by the FDA for these devices is
typically accomplished through the so-called 510(k) pre-market
notification procedure. When 510(k) clearance is sought, a
sponsor must submit a pre-market notification demonstrating that
the proposed device is substantially equivalent to a previously
approved device. If the FDA agrees that the proposed device is
substantially equivalent to the predicate device, then 510(k)
clearance to market will be granted. After a device receives
510(k) clearance, any modification
67
that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or
that would constitute a major change in its intended use,
requires a new 510(k) clearance or could require pre-market
approval, or PMA.
Clinical trials are almost always required to support a PMA
application and are sometimes required for a 510(k) pre-market
notification. These trials generally require submission of an
application for an investigational device exemption, or IDE. An
IDE must be supported by pre-clinical data, such as animal and
laboratory testing results, which show that the device is safe
to test in humans and that the study protocols are
scientifically sound. The IDE must be approved in advance by the
FDA for a specified number of patients, unless the product is
deemed a non-significant risk device and is eligible for more
abbreviated investigational device exemption requirements.
Both before and after a medical device is commercially
distributed, manufacturers and marketers of the device have
ongoing responsibilities under FDA regulations. The FDA reviews
design and manufacturing practices, labeling and record keeping,
and manufacturers’ required reports of adverse experiences
and other information to identify potential problems with
marketed medical devices. Device manufacturers are subject to
periodic and unannounced inspection by the FDA for compliance
with the Quality System Regulation, current good manufacturing
practice requirements that govern the methods used in, and the
facilities and controls used for, the design, manufacture,
packaging, servicing, labeling, storage, installation and
distribution of all finished medical devices intended for human
use.
FDA regulations prohibit the advertising and promotion of a
medical device for any use outside the scope of a 510(k)
clearance or PMA approval or for unsupported safety or
effectiveness claims. Although the FDA does not regulate
physicians’ practice of medicine, the FDA does regulate
manufacturer communications with respect to off-label use.
If the FDA finds that a manufacturer has failed to comply with
FDA laws and regulations or that a medical device is ineffective
or poses an unreasonable health risk, it can institute or seek a
wide variety of enforcement actions and remedies, ranging from a
public warning letter to more severe actions such as:
|
|
|
|
•
|
fines, injunctions and civil penalties;
|
|
|
•
|
recall or seizure of products;
|
|
|
•
|
operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of
production;
|
|
|
•
|
refusing requests for 510(k) clearance or PMA approval of new
products;
|
|
|
•
|
withdrawing 510(k) clearance or PMA approvals already
granted; and
|
|
|
•
|
criminal prosecution.
|
The FDA also has the authority to require repair, replacement or
refund of the cost of any medical device.
The FDA also administers certain controls over the export of
medical devices from the United States, as international sales
of medical devices that have not received FDA approval are
subject to FDA export requirements. Additionally, each foreign
country subjects such medical devices to its own regulatory
requirements. In the European Union, a single regulatory
approval process has been created, and approval is represented
by the CE Mark.
Pharmaceutical
Product Regulation
In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and implementing
regulations that are adopted under the FDCA. In the case of
biologics, the FDA regulates such products under the Public
Health Service Act. If we fail to comply with the applicable
requirements under these laws and regulations at any time during
the product development process, approval process, or after
approval, we may become subject to administrative or judicial
sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal
to approve pending applications, withdrawals of approvals,
clinical holds, warning letters, product recalls, product
seizures, total or partial suspension of our operations,
injunctions, fines, civil penalties
68
or criminal prosecution. Any agency enforcement action could
have a material adverse effect on us. The FDA also administers
certain controls over the export of drugs and biologics from the
United States.
Under the United States regulatory scheme, the development
process for new pharmaceutical products can be divided into
three distinct phases:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Pre-Clinical Phase.
The pre-clinical phase
involves the discovery, characterization, product formulation
and animal testing necessary to prepare an Investigational New
Drug application, or IND, for submission to the FDA. The IND
must be accepted by the FDA before the drug can be tested in
humans.
|
|
|
•
|
Clinical Phase.
The clinical phase of
development follows a successful IND submission and involves the
activities necessary to demonstrate the safety, tolerability,
efficacy, and dosage of the substance in humans, as well as the
ability to produce the substance in accordance with cGMP
requirements. Data from these activities are compiled in a New
Drug Application, or NDA, or for biologic products a Biologics
License Application, or BLA, for submission to the FDA
requesting approval to market the drug.
|
|
|
•
|
Post-Approval Phase.
The post-approval phase
follows FDA approval of the NDA or BLA, and involves the
production and continued analytical and clinical monitoring of
the product. The post- approval phase may also involve the
development and regulatory approval of product modifications and
line extensions, including improved dosage forms, of the
approved product, as well as for generic versions of the
approved drug, as the product approaches expiration of patent or
other exclusivity protection.
|
Each of these three phases is discussed further below.
Pre-Clinical Phase.
The development of a new
pharmaceutical agent begins with the discovery or synthesis of a
new molecule. These agents are screened for pharmacological
activity using various animal and tissue models, with the goal
of selecting a lead agent for further development. Additional
studies are conducted to confirm pharmacological activity, to
generate safety data, and to evaluate prototype dosage forms for
appropriate release and activity characteristics. Once the
pharmaceutically active molecule is fully characterized, an
initial purity profile of the agent is established. During this
and subsequent stages of development, the agent is analyzed to
confirm the integrity and quality of material produced. In
addition, development and optimization of the initial dosage
forms to be used in clinical trials are completed, together with
analytical models to determine product stability and
degradation. A bulk supply of the active ingredient to support
the necessary dosing in initial clinical trials must be secured.
Upon successful completion of pre-clinical safety and efficacy
studies in animals, an IND submission is prepared and provided
to the FDA for review prior to commencement of human clinical
trials. The IND consists of the initial chemistry, analytical,
formulation, and animal testing data generated during the
pre-clinical phase. The review period for an IND submission is
30 days, after which, if no comments are made by the FDA,
the product candidate can be studied in Phase I clinical
trials.
Clinical Phase.
Following successful
submission of an IND, the sponsor is permitted to conduct
clinical trials involving the administration of the
investigational product candidate to human subjects under the
supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with good
clinical practice. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols
detailing, among other things, the objectives of the study and
the parameters to be used in assessing the safety and the
efficacy of the drug. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA
as part of the IND prior to beginning the trial. Each trial must
be reviewed, approved and conducted under the auspices of an
independent Institutional Review Board, and each trial, with
limited exceptions, must include the patient’s informed
consent. Typically, clinical evaluation involves the following
time-consuming and costly three-phase sequential process:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Phase I.
Phase I human clinical
trials are conducted in a limited number of healthy individuals
to determine the drug’s safety and tolerability and include
biological analyses to determine the availability and
metabolization of the active ingredient following
administration. The total number of subjects and patients
included in Phase I clinical trials varies, but is
generally in the range of 20 to 80 people.
|
69
|
|
|
|
•
|
Phase II.
Phase II clinical trials
involve administering the drug to individuals who suffer from
the target disease or condition to determine the drug’s
potential efficacy and ideal dose. These clinical trials are
typically well controlled, closely monitored, and conducted in a
relatively small number of patients, usually involving no more
than several hundred subjects. These trials require scale up for
manufacture of increasingly larger batches of bulk chemical.
These batches require validation analysis to confirm the
consistent composition of the product.
|
|
|
•
|
Phase III.
Phase III clinical trials
are performed after preliminary evidence suggesting
effectiveness of a drug has been obtained and safety (toxicity),
tolerability, and an ideal dosing regimen have been established.
Phase III clinical trials are intended to gather additional
information about the effectiveness and safety that is needed to
evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug and
to complete the information needed to provide adequate
instructions for the use of the drug, also referred to as the
Official Product Information. Phase III trials usually
include from several hundred to several thousand subjects.
|
Throughout the clinical phase, samples of the product made in
different batches are tested for stability to establish shelf
life constraints. In addition, large-scale production protocols
and written standard operating procedures for each aspect of
commercial manufacture and testing must be developed.
Phase I, II, and III testing may not be completed
successfully within any specified time period, if at all. The
FDA closely monitors the progress of each of the three phases of
clinical trials that are conducted under an IND and may, at its
discretion, reevaluate, alter, suspend, or terminate the testing
based upon the data accumulated to that point and the FDA’s
assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient. Clinical
investigators, IRBs, and companies may be subject to
pre-approval, routine, or “for cause” inspections by
the FDA for compliance with Good Clinical Practices, or GCPs,
and FDA regulations governing clinical investigations. The FDA
may suspend or terminate clinical trials, or a clinical
investigator’s participation in a clinical trial, at any
time for various reasons, including a finding that the subjects
or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
The FDA can also request additional clinical trials be conducted
as a condition to product approval. Additionally, new government
requirements may be established that could delay or prevent
regulatory approval of our products under development.
Furthermore, institutional review boards, which are independent
entities constituted to protect human subjects in the
institutions in which clinical trials are being conducted, have
the authority to suspend clinical trials in their respective
institutions at any time for a variety of reasons, including
safety issues.
Post-Approval Phase.
After approval, we are
still subject to continuing regulation by FDA, including, but
not limited to, record keeping requirements, submitting periodic
reports to the FDA, reporting of any adverse experiences with
the product, and complying with drug sampling and distribution
requirements. In addition, we are required to maintain and
provide updated safety and efficacy information to the FDA. We
are also required to comply with requirements concerning
advertising and promotional labeling. In that regard, our
advertising and promotional materials must be truthful and not
misleading. We are also prohibited from promoting any non-FDA
approved or “off-label” indications of products.
Failure to comply with those requirements could result in
significant enforcement action by the FDA, including warning
letters, orders to pull the promotional materials, and
substantial fines. Also, quality control and manufacturing
procedures must continue to conform to cGMP after approval.
Drug and biologics manufacturers and their subcontractors are
required to register their facilities and products manufactured
annually with FDA and certain state agencies and are subject to
periodic routine and unannounced inspections by the FDA to
assess compliance with cGMP regulations. Facilities may also be
subject to inspections by other federal, foreign, state, or
local agencies. In addition, approved biological drug products
may be subject to
lot-by-lot
release testing by the FDA before these products can be
commercially distributed. Accordingly, manufacturers must
continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of
production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMP
and other aspects of regulatory compliance. Future FDA
inspections may identify compliance issues at our facilities or
at the facilities that may disrupt production or distribution,
or require substantial resources to correct.
70
In addition, following FDA approval of a product, discovery of
problems with a product or the failure to comply with
requirements may result in restrictions on a product,
manufacturer, or holder of an approved marketing application,
including withdrawal or recall of the product from the market or
other voluntary or FDA-initiated action that could delay further
marketing. Newly discovered or developed safety or effectiveness
data may require changes to a product’s approved labeling,
including the addition of new warnings and contraindications.
Also, the FDA may require post-market testing and surveillance
to monitor the product’s safety or efficacy, including
additional clinical studies, known as Phase IV trials, to
evaluate long-term effects.
Regulation
of Disinfectants
In the United States, the EPA, regulates disinfectants as
antimicrobial pesticides under FIFRA and the implementing
regulations that EPA has adopted under FIFRA. Before marketing a
disinfectant in the United States, we must satisfy EPA’s
pesticide registration requirements. That registration process
requires us to demonstrate the disinfectant’s efficacy and
to determine the potential human and ecological risks associated
with use of the disinfectant. The testing and registration
process could be lengthy and could be expensive. There is no
assurance, however, that we will be able to satisfy all of the
pesticide registration requirements for a particular proposed
new disinfectant product. Once we satisfy the FIFRA registration
requirements for an individual disinfectant, additional FIFRA
regulations will apply to our various business activities,
including marketing, related to that EPA-registered product.
Failure to comply with FIFRA’s requirements could expose us
to various enforcement actions. FIFRA empowers EPA to seek
administrative or judicial sanctions against those who violate
FIFRA. Among the potential FIFRA penalties are civil
administrative penalties, stop sale orders, cancellation of our
registration, seizures, injunctions and criminal sanctions. If
EPA were to initiate a FIFRA enforcement action against us, it
could have a material adverse effect on us.
Other
Regulation in the United States
Health
Care Coverage and Reimbursement by Third-Party Payors
Commercial success in marketing and selling our products
depends, in part, on the availability of adequate coverage and
reimbursement from third-party health care payors, such as
government and private health insurers and managed care
organizations. Third-party payers are increasingly challenging
the pricing of medical products and services. Government and
private sector initiatives to limit the growth of health care
costs, including price regulation, competitive pricing, and
managed-care arrangements, are continuing in many countries
where we do business, including the United States. These
changes are causing the marketplace to be more cost-conscious
and focused on the delivery of more cost-effective medical
products. Government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid,
private health care insurance companies, and managed-care plans
have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the
amount of reimbursement for particular procedures or treatments.
This has created an increasing level of price sensitivity among
customers for our products. Examples of how limits on drug
coverage and reimbursement in the United States may cause drug
price sensitivity include the growth of managed care, changing
Medicare reimbursement methodologies, decisions on which drugs
to include in formularies and drug rebate calculations. Some
third-party payors also require pre-approval of coverage for new
or innovative devices or therapies before they will reimburse
health care providers who use the medical devices or therapies.
Even though a new medical product may have been cleared or
approved for commercial distribution, we may find limited demand
for the product until coverage and reimbursement have been
obtained from governmental and other third-party payors.
Fraud and
Abuse Laws
In the United States, we are subject to various federal and
state laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, which,
among other things, prohibit the payment of remuneration
intended to induce the purchase of products or services and the
fraudulent billing of federal healthcare programs. These laws
include the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the False Claim Act
and comparable state laws. These laws constrain the sales,
marketing and other promotional activities of pharmaceutical
companies, such as us, by limiting the kinds of
71
financial arrangements (including for example, our sales
programs and physician advisory board relationships) we may have
with prescribers, purchasers, dispensers and users of drugs. In
addition, the HHS Office of Inspector General, or OIG, has
issued Compliance Guidance for pharmaceutical manufacturers
which, among other things, identifies manufacturer practices
implicating the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and describes
elements of an effective compliance program. Similarly, a
recently enacted California law requires pharmaceutical
companies to comply with both the federal guidance and the
July 2002 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America Code on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals.
Due to the breadth of the provisions of some of these laws, it
is possible that some of our practices might be challenged under
one or more of these laws in the future. Violations of these
laws, which are discussed more fully below, can lead to civil
and criminal penalties, damages, imprisonment, fines, exclusion
from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal
health care programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of
our operations. Any such violations could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
Anti-Kickback Laws.
Our operations are subject
to federal and state anti-kickback laws. The federal
Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from knowingly and
willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or providing
remuneration directly or indirectly to induce either the
referral of an individual, or the furnishing, recommending, or
arranging of a good or service, for which payment may be made
under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare or
Medicaid. The definition of “remuneration” has been
broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including such
items as gifts, discounts, the furnishing of supplies or
equipment, waiver of payments, and providing anything at less
than its fair market value. HHS has issued regulations, commonly
known as “safe harbors,” that set forth certain
provisions which, if fully met, will assure healthcare providers
and other parties that they will not be prosecuted under the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute. The failure of a transaction or
arrangement to fit precisely within one or more safe harbors
does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution
will be pursued. However, conduct and business arrangements that
do not fully satisfy each applicable safe harbor may result in
increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities, such
as OIG. In addition, many states have adopted laws similar to
the federal Anti-Kickback Statute which apply to the referral of
patients for healthcare services reimbursed by any source, not
only by the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
False Claims Laws.
The federal False Claims
Act prohibits the knowing filing of a false claim or the knowing
use of false statements to obtain payment from the federal
government. Suits filed under the False Claims Act, known as
“qui tam” actions, can be brought by any
individual on behalf of the government and such individuals,
commonly known as “whistleblowers,” may share in any
amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or
settlement. In addition, certain states have enacted laws
modeled after the Federal False Claims Act. Qui tam actions
have increased significantly in recent years, causing greater
numbers of healthcare companies to have to defend a false claims
action, pay fines or be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or
other federal or state government healthcare programs as a
result of investigations arising out of such actions.
HIPAA.
Two federal crimes were created under
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996,
or HIPAA: healthcare fraud and false statements relating to
healthcare matters. The healthcare fraud statute prohibits
knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any
healthcare benefit program, including private payors. The false
statements statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying,
concealing or covering up a material fact or making any
materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in
connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare
benefits, items or services.
Health
Information Privacy and Security
Individually identifiable health information is subject to an
array of federal and state regulation. Federal rules promulgated
pursuant to HIPAA regulate the use and disclosure of health
information by “covered entities.” Covered entities
include individual and institutional providers from which we may
receive individually identifiable health information. These
regulations govern, among other things, the use and disclosure
of health information for research purposes, and require the
covered entity to obtain the written authorization of
72
the individual before using or disclosing health information
for research. Failure of the covered entity to obtain such
authorization could subject the covered entity to civil and
criminal penalties. We may experience delays and complex
negotiations as we deal with each entity’s differing
interpretation of the regulations and what is required for
compliance. Also, where our customers or contractors are covered
entities, including hospitals, universities, physicians or
clinics, we may be required by the HIPAA regulations to enter
into “business associate” agreements that subject us
to certain privacy and security requirements. In addition, many
states have laws that apply to the use and disclosure of health
information, and these laws could also affect the manner in
which we conduct our research and other aspects of our business.
Such state laws are not preempted by the federal privacy law
where they afford greater privacy protection to the individual.
While activities to assure compliance with health information
privacy laws are a routine business practice, we are unable to
predict the extent to which our resources may be diverted in the
event of an investigation or enforcement action with respect to
such laws.
Foreign
Regulation
Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must
obtain approval of a product by the applicable regulatory
authorities of foreign countries before we can commence clinical
trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The
approval process varies from country to country, and the time
may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval.
The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials,
product licensing, pricing, and reimbursement also vary greatly
from country to country. Although governed by the applicable
country, clinical trials conducted outside of the United States
typically are administered under a three-phase sequential
process similar to that discussed above for pharmaceutical
products.
European
Union Regulation
Medical Device Regulation.
Our Microcyn
products are classified as medical devices in the European
Union. In order to sell our medical device products within the
European Union, we are required to comply with the requirements
of the Medical Devices Directive, or MDD, and its national
implementations, including affixing CE Marks on our products. In
order to comply with the MDD, we must meet certain requirements
relating to the safety and performance of our products and,
prior to marketing our products, we must successfully undergo
verification of our product’s regulatory compliance, or
conformity assessment.
Medical devices are divided into three regulatory classes:
Class I, Class IIb and Class III. The nature of
the conformity assessment procedures depends on the regulatory
class of the product. We executed the conformity assessment for
production quality assurance for Class IIb products for
Dermacyn Wound Care. Compliance with production quality
assurance is audited every year by a private entity certified by
government regulators. In order to comply with the examination,
we completed, among other things, a risk analysis and presented
clinical data, which demonstrated that our products met the
performance specifications claimed by us, provided sufficient
evidence of adequate assessment of unwanted side effects and
demonstrated that the benefits to the patient outweigh the risks
associated with the device. We will be subject to continued
supervision and will be required to report any serious adverse
incidents to the appropriate authorities. We will also be
required to comply with additional national requirements that
are beyond the scope of the MDD.
We received our CE certificate for Dermacyn Wound Care as a
Class IIb medical device in February 2005. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to maintain the requirements
established for CE Marks for any or all of our products or that
we will be able to produce these products in a timely and
profitable manner while complying with the requirements of the
MDD and other regulatory requirements.
Marketing Authorizations for Drugs.
In order
to obtain marketing approval of any of our drug products in
Europe, we must submit for review an application similar to a
U.S. NDA to the relevant authority. In contrast to the
United States, where the FDA is the only authority that
administers and approves NDAs, in Europe there are multiple
authorities that administer and approve these applications.
Marketing authorizations in Europe expire after five years but
may be renewed.
73
We believe that our Microcyn based drugs will be reviewed by the
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, on
behalf of the European Medicines Agency, or EMEA. Based upon the
review of the CHMP, the EMEA provides an opinion to the European
Commission on the safety, quality and efficacy of the drug. The
decision to grant or refuse an authorization is made by the
European Commission.
Approval of applications can take several months to several
years, or may be denied. This approval process can be affected
by many of the same factors relating to safety, quality and
efficacy as in the approval process for NDAs in the United
States. As in the United States, European drug regulatory
authorities can require us to perform additional non-clinical
studies and clinical trials. The need for such studies or
trials, if imposed, may delay marketing approval and involve
unanticipated costs. Inspection of clinical investigation sites
by a competent authority may also be required as part of the
regulatory approval procedure. In addition, as a condition of
marketing approval, regulatory agencies in Europe may require
post-marketing surveillance to monitor for adverse effects, or
other additional studies as deemed appropriate. The terms of any
approval, including labeling content, may be more restrictive
than expected and could affect the marketability of a product.
In addition, after approval for the initial indication, further
clinical studies are usually necessary to gain approval for any
additional indications.
European GMP.
In the European Union, the
manufacture of pharmaceutical products and clinical trial
supplies is subject to good manufacturing practice, or GMP, as
set forth in the relevant laws and guidelines. Compliance with
GMP is generally assessed by the competent regulatory
authorities. They may conduct inspections of relevant
facilities, and review manufacturing procedures, operating
systems and personnel qualifications. In addition to obtaining
approval for each product, in many cases each drug manufacturing
facility must be approved. Further inspections may occur over
the life of the product.
Mexico
The MOH is the authority in charge of sanitary controls in
Mexico. Sanitary controls are a group of practices related to
the orientation, education, testing, verification and
application of security measures and sanctions exercised by the
MOH. The MOH acts by virtue of the Federal Commission for the
Protection against Sanitary Risks, or COFEPRIS, a decentralized
entity of the MOH whose mission is to protect the population
against sanitary risks, by means of centralized sanitary
regulations, controls and by raising public awareness.
The MOH is responsible for the issuance of Official Mexican
Standards and specifications for drugs subject to the provisions
of the General Health Law, which govern the process and
specifications of drugs, including the obtaining, preparation,
manufacturing, maintenance, mixture, conditioning, packaging,
handling, transport, distribution, storage and supply of
products to the public at large. In addition, a medical device
is defined as a device that may contain antiseptics or
germicides used in surgical practice or in the treatment of
continuity solutions, skin injuries or its attachments.
Regulations applicable to medical devices and drugs are divided
into two sections: the business that manufacture the medical
device or drug and the product itself.
Manufacturing a Medical Device or Drug.
Under
the General Health Law, a business that manufactures drugs is
either required to obtain a Sanitary Authorization or to file an
Operating Notice. Our Mexico subsidiary is considered a business
that manufactures medical devices and therefore is not subject
to a Sanitary Authorization, but rather only an Operating Notice.
In addition to its Operating Notice, our Mexico subsidiary has
obtained a “Good Processing Practices Certificate”
issued by COFEPRIS, which demonstrates that the manufacturing of
Microcyn at the facility located in Zapopan, Mexico, operates in
accordance with the applicable official standards.
Commercialization of Drugs and Medical
Devices.
Drugs and medical devices should be
commercialized in appropriate packaging containing labels
printed in accordance with specific official standards. For
medical devices, there are no specific standards or regulations
related to the labeling of the product, but rather only a
general standard related to the labeling for all types of
products to be commercialized in Mexico. Advertising of medical
devices is regulated in the General Health Law and in the
specific regulations of the
74
General Health Law related to advertising. Generally, the
advertising of medical devices is subject to a permit only in
the case that such advertising is directed to the general public.
Medical Devices and Drugs as a Product.
To
produce, sell or distribute medical devices, a Sanitary Registry
is required in accordance with the General Health Law and the
Regulation for Drugs. Such registry is granted for a term of
five years, and this term may be extended. The Sanitary Registry
may be revoked if the interested party does not request the
extension in the term or the product or the manufacturer or the
raw material is changed without the permission of the MOH.
The MOH classifies the medical devices in three classes:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Class I. Devices for which safety and effectiveness have
been duly proved and are generally not used inside the body;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Class II. Devices that may vary with respect to the
material used for its fabrication or in its concentration and
generally used in the inside of the body for a period no greater
than 30 days; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Class III. New devices or recently approved devices in the
medical practice or those used inside the body and which shall
remain inside the body for a period greater than 30 days.
|
Violation of these regulations may result in the revocation of
the registrations or approvals, and, in addition, economic
fines. In some cases, such violations may constitute criminal
actions.
In addition, regulatory approval of prices is required in most
countries other than the United States, which could result in
lengthy negotiations delaying our ability to commercialize our
products. We face the risk that the prices which result from the
regulatory approval process would be insufficient to generate an
acceptable return.
Employees
As of August 31, 2006, we had 82 full-time employees,
including 23 in manufacturing, 11 in research and development,
three in regulatory and clinical, 16 in sales and marketing and
29 in administrative functions. In late 2006, we plan to add
additional sales and marketing personnel to support our various
markets and opportunities. We also plan to hire additional
marketing and clinical support personnel to work with key
opinion leaders, and to provide educational services and
technical support our distribution channels. None of our
employees is covered by collective bargaining arrangements, and
we consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
Properties
We currently lease approximately 12,000 square feet of
office, research and manufacturing space in Petaluma,
California, which serves as our principal executive offices. We
also lease approximately 20,000 square feet of office space
in an adjacent building for manufacturing and research and
development, which will increase to 28,000 square feet in
October 2006. Both leases expire in September 2007.
We lease approximately 4,000 square feet of office space
and approximately 14,000 square feet of manufacturing and
warehouse space in Zapopan, Mexico, under a lease that expires
in April 2011. We lease approximately 5,000 square feet of
office space and approximately 14,000 square feet of
manufacturing and warehouse space in Sittard, The Netherlands,
under leases that expire in January 2009. As we expand, we
may need to establish manufacturing facilities in other
countries.
We believe our properties are adequate to meet our needs through
June 2007.
Legal
Proceedings
In April 2005, a former director and Chief Operating
Officer of our company filed an action in the Superior Court of
the State of California, Sonoma County, alleging breach of
employment contract. In the complaint, the plaintiff claims
$300,000 and the right to purchase approximately
600,000 shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share.
A trial date has been set in September 2006. We are
currently in settlement
75
negotiations with the plaintiff. If these negotiations are not
successful, we intend to vigorously defend this action. If the
claims are litigated, we may incur considerable litigation
costs. We expect our insurance carrier to cover a portion of the
claim.
In March 2006, we filed suit in the Northern District of
California Federal Court against Nofil Corporation and Naoshi
Kono, its Chief Executive Officer, for breach of contract,
misappropriation of trade secrets and trademark infringement. We
believe that Nofil Corporation violated key terms of both an
exclusive purchase agreement and non-disclosure agreement by
contacting and working with a potential competitor in Mexico. In
the complaint, we seek damages of $3.5 million and
immediate injunctive relief. No trial date has been set.
In September 2005, a complaint was filed against us in Mexico
claiming confusion in trademarks with respect to our Microcyn60
mark. We may stop using the name Microcyn60 in Mexico as a
result of the proposed settlement of this lawsuit. A second
unrelated claim was filed against us in Mexico in May 2006,
claiming confusion in trademarks with respect to our Microcyn60
mark in Mexico.
In September 2006, a consulting firm in Mexico City contacted us
threatening legal action in Mexico, alleging breach of contract
and claiming damages of $225,000. A formal compliant has not
been served and no trial date has been set. We are currently in
settlement negotiations with the plaintiff. If these
negotiations are not successful, we intend to vigorously defend
this action. If the claims are litigated, we may incur
considerable litigation costs.
Except for the foregoing, we are not a party to any material
legal proceedings, and, except as set forth above, management is
not aware of any threatened legal proceedings that it believes
could cause a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition or results of operations. From time to time, we may be
party to lawsuits in the ordinary course of business.
76
GLOSSARY
OF TECHNICAL, MEDICAL AND INDUSTRY TERMS
The following technical, medical, and industry-specific terms
used in this prospectus have the following meanings:
|
|
|
Anti-infective
|
|
Capable of killing infectious agents or of preventing them from
spreading and causing infection.
|
|
Antimicrobial
|
|
Capable of destroying or inhibiting the growth of
micro-organisms.
|
|
Antiseptic
|
|
A germicide used on skin or living tissue for the purpose of
inhibiting or destroying microorganisms (for example, alcohol,
chlorhexidine, chlorine, hexachlorophene, iodine, chloroxylenol
PCMX, quaternary ammonium compounds, and triclosan).
|
|
Disinfection
|
|
Destruction of pathogenic and other kinds of microorganisms by
physical or chemical means. Disinfection is less lethal than
sterilization, because it destroys the majority of recognized
pathogenic microorganisms, but not necessarily all microbial
forms (for example, bacterial spores). Disinfection does not
ensure the degree of safety associated with sterilization
processes.
|
|
|
|
Germicide
|
|
An agent that destroys microorganisms, especially pathogenic
organisms. Terms with the same suffix (e.g., virucide,
fungicide, bactericide, tuberculocide, and sporicide) indicate
agents that destroy the specific microorganism identified by the
prefix. Germicides can be used to inactivate microorganisms in
or on living tissue (antiseptics), or on environmental surfaces
(disinfectants).
|
|
|
|
Microbial load
|
|
Number of viable organisms in or on an object or surface or
organic material on a surface or object before decontamination
or sterilization.
|
|
P-value
|
|
Indicates the probability that the result obtained in a
statistical test is due to chance rather than a true
relationship between measures. A small p-value, generally less
than 0.05, or p<0.05, indicates that it is very unlikely
that the results are due to chance.
|
|
|
|
Pathogen
|
|
A specific causative agent of disease, such as a bacteria, virus
or fungus.
|
|
|
|
Spore
|
|
A small, usually single-celled reproductive body that is highly
resistant to desiccation and heat and is capable of growing into
a new organism, produced especially by certain bacteria, fungi,
algae, and nonflowering plants. A dormant nonreproductive body
formed by certain bacteria in response to adverse environmental
conditions.
|
|
Wound debridement
|
|
Surgical removal of dead, devitalized or contaminated tissue and
removal of foreign matter from a wound.
|
77
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers, Key Employees and Directors
The following table shows information about our executive
officers, key employees and directors as of August 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Hojabr Alimi
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chairman of the Board
|
Michael Wokasch
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
Robert Miller
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
James Schutz
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Vice President of Corporate
Development, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Director
|
Theresa Mitchell
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Vice President of Regulatory,
Clinical Affairs, Quality Assurance and Research and Development
|
Bruce Thornton
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Vice President of International
Operations and Sales
|
Robert Northey, Ph.D.
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Director of Research and
Development
|
Andres
Gutiérrez, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director of Medical Affairs
|
Gerard de Nies
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Director of Marketing and
Sales-Europe, Middle East and Africa of Oculus Innovative
Sciences Netherlands
|
Sergio Caleti
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Commercial Director of Oculus
Technologies of Mexico
|
Akihisa Akao
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director
|
Edward
Brown
(3)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard
Conley
(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Gregory
French
(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the audit committee
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the compensation committee
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee
|
Hojabr Alimi
, one of our founders, has served as our
Chief Executive Officer, President and director since 1999 and
was appointed as Chairman of the board of directors in
June 2006. Prior to co-founding our company with his spouse
in 1999, Mr. Alimi was a Corporate Microbiologist for
Arterial Vascular Engineering. Mr. Alimi received a B.A. in
biology from Sonoma State University.
Michael Wokasch
has served as our Chief Operating Officer
since June 2006. From July 2004 to May 2006, Mr. Wokasch
served as Senior Vice President Global Commercial Operations for
the Biopharmaceuticals division of Chiron Corporation, a
biotechnology company. He served as Chief Operating Officer of
Impax Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company, from January 2003
to June 2004. Prior to Impax, Mr. Wokasch served as
President of PanVera Corporation and then Aurora Biosciences
Corporation, both drug discovery subsidiary companies of Vertex
Pharmaceuticals, from July 2001 to December 2002, and as Chief
Executive Officer of Gala Design, a biotechnology company, from
June 2000 to July 2001. Prior to this, he held sales and
marketing positions at Abbott Laboratories, Merck &
Co., and Miles Inc. Mr. Wokasch received a B.S. from the
University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy.
Robert Miller
has served as our Chief Financial Officer
since June 2004 and was a consultant to us from March 2003 to
May 2004. Mr. Miller has served as a director of Scanis,
Inc. since 1998 and served as acting Chief Financial Officer
from 1998 to June 2006. He was a Chief Financial Officer
consultant to Evit Labs from June 2003 to December 2004,
Wildlife International Network from October 2002 to December
2005, Endoscopic Technologies from November 2002 to March 2004,
Biolog from January 2000 to December 2002
78
and Webware from August 2000 to August 2002. Prior to this,
Mr. Miller was the Chief Financial Officer for GAF
Corporation, Penwest Ltd. and Bugle Boy and Treasurer of Mead
Corporation. He received a B.A. in economics from Stanford
University and an M.B.A. in finance from Columbia University.
James Schutz
has served as our Vice President of
Corporate Development and General Counsel since August 2003, as
a director since May 2004 and Corporate Secretary since June
2006. From August 2001 to August 2003, Mr. Schutz served as
General Counsel at Jomed, (formerly EndoSonic Corp.) an
international medical device company. From 1999 to July 2001,
Mr. Schutz served as in-house counsel at Urban Media
Communications Corporation, an Internet/telecom company based in
Palo Alto, California. Mr. Schutz received a B.A. in
economics from the University of California, San Diego and
a J.D. from the University of San Francisco School of Law.
Theresa Mitchell
has served as our Vice President of
Regulatory, Clinical Affairs, Quality Assurance and Research and
Development since March 2005. Prior to joining us,
Ms. Mitchell took a sabbatical following her service as
Vice President, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs and Quality
Assurance at Oratec Interventions, Inc., a medical device
company, from December 1998 to December 2003. She has held
senior regulatory and clinical positions at Target Therapeutics,
Fidus Medical, General Surgical Innovations and Advanced
Cardiovascular Systems. Ms. Mitchell received a B.A. in
experimental psychology/biostatistics and an M.A. in liberal
arts from California State University, San Francisco.
Bruce Thornton
has served as our Vice President of
International Operations and Sales since June 2005.
Mr. Thornton served as our General Manager for
U.S. Operations from March 2004 to July 2005. He served as
Vice President of Operations for Jomed (formerly EndoSonic
Corp.) from January 1999 to September 2003, and as Vice
President of Manufacturing for Volcano Therapeutics, an
international medical device company, following its acquisition
of Jomed, until March 2004. Mr. Thornton received a B.S. in
aeronautical science from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
and an M.B.A. from National University.
Robert Northey, Ph.D.
has served as our Director of
Research and Development since July 2005. Dr. Northey
served as a consultant to us from May 2001 to June 2005. From
August 1998 until June 2005, he was an Assistant Professor in
the Paper Science and Engineering Department at the University
of Washington. Dr. Northey received a B.S. in wood and
fiber science and a Ph.D. in wood chemistry, each from the
University of Washington.
Andres Gutiérrez, M.D., Ph.D.
has served as our
Director of Medical Affairs since August 2005.
Dr. Gutiérrez served as a consultant to us from April
2003 to July 2005. He served as the Head of the Cell Therapy
Unit at the National Institute of Rehabilitation in Mexico City
from September 2000 to July 2005 and as a consulting physician
with the Department of Medicine at Hospital Angeles del
Pederegal in Mexico City from 1996 to July 2005. He received an
M.D. with a specialty in internal medicine, and a Ph.D. in
biomedical sciences, each from the National University of Mexico
in Mexico City.
Gerard de Nies
has served as Director of
Marketing and Sales - Europe, Middle East and Africa of our
Netherlands subsidiary, since August 2005. Mr. de Nies held
a similar position in Kimberly-Clark for the
Scientific & Industrial division, where he was
responsible for sales and marketing in Europe from July 1999
through August 2005. He was the Sales Manager in the Ethicon
Endo-Surgery division of Johnson & Johnson from June
1993 to July 1999. Mr. de Nies received a Bachelor of
nursing and of healthcare management, each from the University
of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sergio Caleti
has served as Commercial Director for our
Mexican subsidiary since February 2005. Mr. Caleti served
as the Mexico National Sales Manager of Darier Laboratories, a
dermatological laboratory, from July 2003 to January 2005. He
served as the Regional Sales Manager, Hospital Products Division
for the central region for Abbott Laboratories from 1999 until
June 2003. Mr. Caleti received an engineering degree from
the Engineering School of Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico.
Akihisa Akao
has served as a director since 1999 and as a
consultant since October 2005. Mr. Akao has
served as President for White Moon Medical, Inc., a consulting
company that provides advice to early-stage companies seeking to
enter the Japanese medical products market. He served as the
general manager in Japan at PowerMedical Interventions Inc., a
medical device company, from January 2001 to September 2005. He
also
79
served as President of
E-Med
Japan,
an application service provider for medical professionals and
consumers, from 1999 to July 2000. Mr. Akao received a B.A.
in electronic engineering from Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Edward Brown
has served as a director since September
2005. Mr. Brown is co-founder of Healthcare Investment
Partners, or HIP, a private equity buyout fund focused
exclusively on healthcare, and has served as a Managing Director
of HIP since June 2004. Before joining HIP, Mr. Brown was a
Managing Director in the Healthcare Group of Credit Suisse First
Boston, where he led the firm’s West Coast healthcare
effort and was one of the senior partners responsible for the
firm’s global life sciences practice, from August 2000 to
June 2004. Mr. Brown serves on the board of directors of
Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Brown received an A.B.
in English from Middlebury College.
Richard Conley
has served as a director since 1999, and
served as our Secretary from July 2002 to June 2006. Since April
2001, Mr. Conley has served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer at Don Sebastiani & Sons
International Wine Negociants, a branded wine marketing company.
From 1994 to March 2001, he served as Senior Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer at Sebastiani Vineyards, a California
wine producer, where he was originally hired as Chief Financial
Officer in 1994. Mr. Conley received a B.S. in finance and
accounting from Western Carolina University and an M.B.A. from
St. Mary’s University.
Gregory French
has served as a director since 2000.
Mr. French is owner and Chairman of the Board of G&C
Enterprises LLC, a real estate and investment company, which he
founded in 1999. He held various engineering and senior
management positions at several medical device companies,
including Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Peripheral Systems
Group and Arterial Vascular Engineering. Mr. French
received a B.S.I.E. from the California State Polytechnic
University, San Luis Obispo.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of six members. We are
actively seeking two additional independent board members. All
directors are elected to hold office until their successors have
been elected and qualified or until the earlier of death,
resignation or removal. The authorized number of directors may
be changed by resolution duly adopted by the board of directors.
Vacancies on the board can be filled by resolution of the board
of directors. Each of Messrs. Brown, Conley and French are
independent directors as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the
National Association of Securities Dealers listing standards.
Upon completion of our reincorporation in the State of Delaware,
our board of directors will be divided into three classes, each
serving staggered three-year terms:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Our Class I directors will consist of Edward Brown and
James Schutz, and their terms will expire at the first annual
meeting of stockholders following the date of this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Our Class II directors will consist of Richard Conley and
Gregory French, and their terms will expire at the second annual
meeting of stockholders following the date of this
prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Our Class III directors will consist of Hojabr Alimi and
Akihisa Akao, and their terms will expire at the third annual
meeting of stockholders following the date of this prospectus.
|
As a result, only one class of directors will be elected at each
annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes
continuing for the remainder of their respective terms. Each
executive officer is appointed by the board of directors and
serves at its discretion. This classification of the board of
directors may delay or prevent a change in control of Oculus or
in our management.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors currently has an audit committee,
compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance
committee, which have the composition and responsibilities
described below. As of the completion of this offering, we
expect that all of the members of our committees will be
independent directors under the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq
Stock Market.
80
Audit Committee.
The audit committee provides
assistance to the board of directors in fulfilling its legal and
fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting,
auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal
compliance functions by:
|
|
|
|
•
|
appointing, retaining, determining compensation and overseeing
our independent accountants;
|
|
|
•
|
ensuring that our accountants are independent from management;
|
|
|
•
|
approving the services performed by our independent accountants;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing our independent accountants’ reports regarding
our accounting policies and systems of internal controls;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements; and
|
|
|
•
|
ensuring the integrity of our financial statements.
|
Our audit committee presently consists of Messrs. Conley
and French. Following this offering, we expect that our audit
committee will consist of Messrs. Conley and French and one
additional independent director, with Mr. Conley serving as
Chairman of the Committee. Each member of the audit committee is
able to read and understand fundamental financial statements,
including our balance sheet, income statement and cash flow
statements. Our board of directors has determined that each of
Messrs. Conley and French is an audit committee financial
expert as currently defined under the rules of the SEC. We
believe that the composition of our audit committee meets the
criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our
audit committee complies with the requirements of, the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and SEC
rules and regulations. Our board of directors has approved and
adopted a written charter for the audit committee.
Compensation Committee.
The compensation
committee performs the following functions, among others, as set
forth in its committee charter:
|
|
|
|
•
|
determining our general compensation policies and the
compensation of our directors and officers;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and approving bonuses for our officers and other
employees;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and determining equity based compensation for our
directors, officers, employees and consultants;
|
|
|
•
|
administering our stock option plans and employee stock purchase
plans;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing corporate goals and objectives relative to executive
compensation; and
|
|
|
•
|
evaluating our chief executive officer’s performance and
setting our chief executive officer’s compensation.
|
The compensation committee historically has established our
chief executive officer compensation. Our compensation committee
presently consists of Messrs. Conley and French. Following
this offering, we expect that our compensation committee will be
comprised of Messrs. Conley and French and one additional
independent director, with Mr. French serving as Chairman
of the Committee. Each member is and will be an outside director
as currently defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and a non-employee director within the
current meaning of
Rule 16b-3
as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We
believe that the composition of our compensation committee meets
the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our
compensation committee complies with the applicable requirements
of, the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee.
The nominating and corporate
governance committee performs the following functions, among
others, as set forth in its committee charter:
|
|
|
|
•
|
evaluating and recommending to the full board of directors
candidates for directorship and the size and composition of the
board;
|
81
|
|
|
|
•
|
recommending members of the board of directors to serve on the
various committees of the board of directors;
|
|
|
•
|
overseeing our corporate governance guidelines;
|
|
|
•
|
developing plans for chief executive officer succession; and
|
|
|
•
|
reporting and making recommendations to the board concerning
corporate governance matters and recommending a code of conduct
for our directors, officers and employees.
|
Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of
Messrs. Brown, Conley and French, with Mr. Brown
serving as Chairman of the Committee. We believe that the
composition of our nominating and corporate governance committee
meets the criteria for independence under the rules of the
Nasdaq Stock Market and SEC rules and regulations.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is presently
nor at any time has been one of our executive officers or
employees. Mr. Conley served as our Secretary from July
2002 until June 2006 but he was not compensated for such
service, other than as a member of our board of directors. No
interlocking relationship exists, or has existed in the past,
between our board or compensation committee and the board or
compensation committee of any other company.
Director
Compensation
We have agreements with each of our directors, including our
employee directors, which provide for the grant of stock options
as compensation for service on our board of directors. Pursuant
to our agreements with each of Messrs. Alimi, Akao, Conley
and French, we granted to each of these directors an option to
purchase 78,283 shares of our common stock, which
represented 0.5% of the then outstanding shares of our common
stock, and granted Mr. Schutz an option to purchase
25,000 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price
of $0.75 per share. We granted an option to purchase
200,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Brown
pursuant to his agreement with an exercise price of
$2.54 per share. All unvested shares underlying these
options will vest in full upon completion of this offering. We
also granted Messrs. Alimi and Schutz options to purchase
50,000 shares and 25,000 shares, respectively, of our
common stock with an exercise price of $2.54 per share. Mr.
Brown’s option vests as to 20% of the shares on the first
anniversary of the grant date and as to
1
/
60
each month thereafter until fully vested. The remainder of the
director options vest as to 20% of the shares on each of the
first five anniversaries of the grant date. In addition, we
reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred on our behalf.
Executive
Compensation
The following table summarizes all compensation paid to our
chief executive officer and to our four other most highly
compensated executive officers whose total annual salary and
bonus exceeded $100,000 for all services rendered in all
capacities to us during the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006. We refer to these
82
individuals as our named executive officers. The compensation
described in this table does not include medical, group life
insurance or other benefits which are generally available to all
of our salaried employees.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
Shares Underlying
|
|
All Other
|
Name and Position(s)
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
Hojabr Alimi
|
|
$
|
262,885
|
|
|
$
|
26,250
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,517
|
(1)
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Miller
|
|
|
183,038
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Schutz
|
|
|
185,961
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
6,246
|
(2)
|
Vice President of Corporate
Development, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theresa Mitchell
|
|
|
170,077
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
402,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Vice President of Regulatory,
Clinical Affairs, Quality Assurance and Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Thornton
|
|
|
171,851
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
362,500
|
|
|
|
5,042
|
(3)
|
Vice President of International
Operations and Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of $350 for IRA contributions and $4,167 for life
insurance premiums.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of $5,486 for IRA contributions and $760 for life
insurance premiums.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of IRA contributions.
|
Options/SAR
Grants Table
The following table set forth certain information for the year
ended March 31, 2006 with respect to stock options granted
to our named executive officers. The percentage of total options
granted is based on an aggregate of 2,518,000 options granted to
employees in the year ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realizable Value
|
|
|
Individual Grants
|
|
|
|
at Assumed
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Rates of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Granted to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation for
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Employees in
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Option Term(4)
|
Name
|
|
Granted(1)
|
|
2005
|
|
Per Share(2)
|
|
Date(3)
|
|
5% ($)
|
|
10% ($)
|
|
Hojabr Alimi
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
10/1/2015
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Robert Miller
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Schutz
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theresa Mitchell
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
4/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,500
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Thornton
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
5/6/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,500
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
10/1/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The options become exercisable as to 20% of the shares on each
of the first five anniversaries of the grant date.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The exercise price is the fair market value of our common stock
on the date of grant, as determined by our board of directors.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The options have a term of ten years, subject to earlier
termination in certain events related to termination of service
or employment. Vesting of the options is subject to acceleration
under certain circumstances described under “Director
Compensation” and “Employment, Severance and Change of
Control Arrangements.”
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The 5% and 10% assumed rates of appreciation are required by the
rules of the SEC and do not represent our estimate or projection
of the future common stock price. There can be no assurance that
any of the values reflected in the table will be achieved.
|
Aggregated
Option/SAR Exercises in 2005 and Fiscal Year-End Option/SAR
Values
The following table shows information concerning the number and
value of unexercised options held by each of the named executive
officers at March 31, 2006. The table assumes a per share
fair market value equal to $ ,
which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of the
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Unexercised
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options at
|
|
|
Options/SARs
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End (#)
|
|
|
at Fiscal Year-End ($)
|
|
Name
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Hojabr Alimi
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,659,314
|
|
|
|
108,969
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Robert Miller
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
295,256
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Schutz
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
405,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theresa Mitchell
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
362,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Thornton
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
386,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment,
Severance and Change of Control Arrangements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of Hojabr
Alimi, Michael Wokasch, Robert Miller, James Schutz, Theresa
Mitchell and Bruce Thornton. In the event Mr. Alimi,
Mr. Wokasch, Mr. Miller or Mr. Schutz is
terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, upon
satisfaction of certain requirements, including executing a
general release of claims against us, the officer is entitled to
accrued but unpaid salary (including vacation pay),
reimbursement of any outstanding business expenses, a lump
severance payment equal to 12 times in the case of
Mr. Wokasch, 18 times in the case of Mr. Miller
and Mr. Schutz, or 24 times in the case of Mr. Alimi,
the average monthly base salary paid to the officer over the
preceding 12 months (or for the term of the officer’s
employment if less than 12 months), automatic vesting of
all unvested options and other equity awards, the extension of
exercisability of all options and other equity awards to at
least 12 months following the date the officer terminates
employment or, if earlier, until the option expires, up to one
year reimbursement for health care premiums and a full gross up
of any excise taxes payable by the officer under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code because of the
foregoing payments and acceleration (including the reimbursement
of any additional federal, state and local taxes payable as a
result of the gross up). If any officer terminates his or her
employment for any reason, he or she must give us 30 days,
or in the case of Mr. Alimi, 60 days prior written
notice.
Hojabr Alimi.
Our agreement with
Mr. Alimi, dated January 1, 2004, provides for an
annual salary of $225,000, which amount may be increased by our
board of directors. Separately, we granted Mr. Alimi an
option to purchase 78,283 shares for service as a director
at an exercise price of $0.75 per share which vests at a
rate of 20% per year from the date of grant provided that
such options will vest in full upon completion of this offering.
84
Michael Wokasch.
Our agreement with
Mr. Wokasch, dated June 10, 2006, provides for an
annual salary of $200,000 as our Chief Operating Officer. In
connection with Mr. Wokasch’s agreement, we granted
him an option to purchase 500,000 shares of our common
stock on July 27, 2006, at an exercise price of $3.00 per
share which will vest over five years from the date of grant. We
will also grant Mr. Wokasch an annual bonus of $100,000
upon meeting certain milestones. Separate from this agreement,
we paid Mr. Wokasch a one time signing bonus of $25,000.
Robert Miller.
Our agreement with
Mr. Miller, dated June 1, 2004, provides for an annual
salary of $165,000. In connection with this agreement, we
granted Mr. Miller an option to purchase 378,532 shares of
common stock, which vested immediately based on
Mr. Miller’s prior consultant work for us, and an
option to purchase 156,724 shares of common stock, which vests
based on Mr. Miller’s hours of service. Upon
completion of this offering, we will grant Mr. Miller an
additional fully-vested option to purchase 240,000 shares of
common stock. All of these options have or will have an exercise
price of $0.75 per share.
James Schutz.
Our agreement with
Mr. Schutz, dated January 1, 2004, provides for an
annual salary of $165,000, which amount may be increased by our
board of directors, and an option to purchase
150,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$0.75 per share which vests in five equal annual
installments from the date of grant. Separately, we granted
Mr. Schutz an option to purchase 25,000 shares for
service as a director at an exercise price of $0.75 per
share which vests at a rate of 20% per year from the date
of grant provided that such options will vest in full upon
completion of this offering.
Theresa Mitchell.
Our agreement with
Ms. Mitchell, dated March 23, 2005, provides for a
salary of $165,000, which amount may be increased by our board
of directors. In connection with Ms. Mitchell’s
agreement, we also granted her an option to purchase
200,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$1.10 per share which vests in five equal annual
installments from the date of grant. We must provide her with
12 months notice if she is terminated without cause. During
this 12-month period, we may provide Ms. Mitchell with
continued salary payments as severance. In the event of a change
of control of Oculus, if Ms. Mitchell is terminated, she is
entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months
of her then base salary and all unvested options and other
equity awards will immediately vest in full and remain
exercisable for at least 12 months following her
termination or, if earlier, the date the option or other equity
award expires. Ms. Mitchell’s agreement also provides
her a full gross up of any excise taxes payable by
Ms. Mitchell under Section 4999 of the Internal
Revenue Code because of the foregoing payments and acceleration
(including the reimbursement of any additional federal, state
and local taxes payable as a result of the gross up).
Bruce Thornton.
Our agreement with Mr.
Thornton, entered on June 2005, provides an annual salary of
$160,000, which amount may be increased by our board of
directors. In connection with his agreement, we also granted him
an option to purchase 80,000 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $1.10 per share which vests ratably over
five years from the date of grant. We must provide him with
6 months notice if he is terminated without cause. During
this 6 month period, we may provide Mr. Thornton with
continued salary payments as severance. In the event of a change
of control of Oculus, if Mr. Thornton is terminated, he is
entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months
of his then base salary, and all unvested options and other
equity awards will immediately vest in full and remain
exercisable for at least 12 months following his
termination or, if earlier, the date the option or other equity
award expires. Mr. Thornton’s agreement also provides
him a full gross up of any excise taxes payable by
Mr. Thornton under Section 4999 of the Internal
Revenue Code because of the foregoing payments and acceleration
(including the reimbursement of any additional federal, state
and local taxes payable as a result of the gross up).
Equity
Compensation Plans
1999
Stock Plan
General.
Our 1999 stock plan was adopted by
our board of directors and approved by our shareholders in
May 1999.
85
Administration.
The compensation committee of
our board of directors administers the 1999 stock plan. The 1999
stock plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options
within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, or Section 422, to employees, officers and
employee directors and the granting of nonstatutory stock
options and stock purchase rights to employees, officers,
directors (including non-employee directors) and consultants.
The administrator determines to whom to grant options or stock
purchase rights, the number of shares under the options or stock
purchase rights, the exercise or purchase price, the fair market
value of our common stock, the term of options, which is
prohibited from exceeding 10 years (five years in the case
of an incentive stock option granted to a shareholder holding
more than 10% of the voting shares of our company, or 10%
holders) and other terms and conditions. Under our 1999 stock
plan, incentive stock options must be granted with an exercise
price of at least 100% of the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of grant, and nonstatutory options must be
granted with an exercise price of at least 85% of the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Incentive
stock options and nonstatutory stock options granted to 10%
holders must have an exercise price of at least 110% of the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. To the
extent an optionee would have the right in any calendar year to
exercise for the first time one or more incentive stock options
for shares having an aggregate fair market value in excess of
$100,000, any such excess options would be treated as
nonstatutory stock options.
Authorized Shares.
Under our 1999 Plan, we
reserved 4,605,000 shares of our common stock for issuance.
As of June 30, 2006, 1,894,599 shares of common stock
remained available for future issuance under our 1999 stock
plan. As of June 30, 2006, options to purchase a total of
1,674,000 shares of common stock were outstanding under the
1999 stock plan at a weighted average exercise price of
$0.11 per share. In June 2006, our board determined that no
additional grants would be made under our 1999 stock plan.
Plan Features.
Options granted under the 1999
stock plan generally vest at the rate of 20% of the total number
of shares subject to the options on each anniversary of the
vesting commencement date. No option may be transferred by the
optionee other than by will or the laws of descent or
distribution. Each option may be exercised during the lifetime
of the optionee only by such optionee. Generally, options
granted under the 1999 stock plan remain exercisable for
12 months following the termination of service of an
optionee by reason of death or disability and remain exercisable
for 3 months upon a termination of service for any other
reason. The 1999 stock plan provides that in the event of a
recapitalization, stock split or similar capital transaction, we
will make appropriate adjustments in order to preserve the
benefits of options outstanding under the plan. If we are
involved in a merger or consolidation, options granted under the
1999 stock plan will fully vest immediately prior to the
effective date of such transaction, unless the surviving or
acquiring company assumes or substitutes an equivalent option or
right for them.
2000
Stock Plan
General.
Our 2000 stock plan was adopted by
our board of directors in March 2000 and was subsequently
approved by our shareholders in June 2000.
Administration.
The compensation committee of
our board of directors administers the 2000 stock plan. The 2000
stock plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options
within the meaning of Section 422 to employees, officers
and employee directors and the granting of nonstatutory stock
options and stock purchase rights to employees, officers,
directors (including non-employee directors) and consultants.
The administrator determines to whom to grant options or stock
purchase rights, the number of shares under the options or stock
purchase rights, the exercise or purchase price, the fair market
value of our common stock, the term of options, which is
prohibited from exceeding 10 years (five years in the case
of an incentive stock option granted to 10% holders) and other
terms and conditions. Under our 2000 stock plan, incentive stock
options must be granted with an exercise price of at least 100%
of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant, and nonstatutory options must be granted with an exercise
price of at least 85% of the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock options and
nonstatutory stock options granted to 10% holders must have an
exercise price of at least 110% of the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. To the extent an optionee
would have the right in any calendar year to exercise for the
first time one or more incentive stock options for shares having
an aggregate fair market value in excess of $100,000, any such
excess options would be treated as nonstatutory stock options.
86
Authorized Shares.
Under our 2000 stock plan,
we reserved 1,395,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance. As of June 30, 2006, 1,223,800 shares of
common stock remained available for future issuance under our
2000 stock plan. As of June 30, 2006, options to purchase a
total of 158,000 shares of common stock were outstanding
under the 2000 stock plan at a weighted average exercise price
of $0.62 per share. In June 2006, our board determined that
no additional grants would be made under our 2000 stock plan.
Plan Features.
Options granted under the 2000
stock plan generally vest at the rate of 20% of the total number
of shares subject to the options on each anniversary of the
vesting commencement date. No option may be transferred by the
optionee other than by will or the laws of descent or
distribution. Each option may be exercised during the lifetime
of the optionee only by such optionee. Generally, options
granted under the 2000 stock plan remain exercisable for
12 months following the termination of service of an
optionee by reason of death or disability and remain exercisable
for 3 months upon a termination of service for any other
reason. The 2000 stock plan provides that in the event of a
recapitalization, stock split or similar capital transaction, we
will make appropriate adjustments in order to preserve the
benefits of options outstanding under the plan. If we are
involved in a merger or consolidation, options granted under the
2000 stock plan will fully vest immediately prior to the
effective date of such transaction, unless the surviving or
acquiring company assumes or substitutes an equivalent option or
right for them.
2003
Stock Plan
General.
Our 2003 stock plan was adopted by
our board of directors and approved by our shareholders in July
2003.
Administration.
The compensation committee of
our board of directors administers the 2003 stock plan. The 2003
stock plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options
within the meaning of Section 422 to employees, officers
and employee directors and the granting of nonstatutory stock
options and stock purchase rights to employees, officers,
directors (including non-employee directors) and consultants.
The administrator determines to whom to grant options or stock
purchase rights, the number of shares under the options or stock
purchase rights, the exercise or purchase price, the fair market
value of our common stock, the term of options, which is
prohibited from exceeding 10 years (five years in the case
of an incentive stock option granted to 10% holders) and other
terms and conditions. Under our 2003 stock plan, incentive stock
options must be granted with an exercise price of at least 100%
of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant, and nonstatutory options must be granted with an exercise
price of at least 85% of the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock options and
nonstatutory stock options granted to 10% holders must have an
exercise price of at least 110% of the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. To the extent an optionee
would have the right in any calendar year to exercise for the
first time one or more incentive stock options for shares having
an aggregate fair market value in excess of $100,000, any such
excess options would be treated as nonstatutory stock options.
Authorized Shares.
Under our 2003 stock plan,
we have reserved 4,000,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance. As of June 30, 2006, 2,626,868 shares of
common stock remained available for future issuance under our
2003 stock plan. As of June 30, 2006, options to purchase a
total of 1,285,818 shares of common stock were outstanding
under the 2003 stock plan at a weighted average exercise price
of $0.75 per share. In June 2006, our board determined that
no additional grants would be made under our 2003 stock plan.
Plan Features.
Options granted under the 2003
stock plan generally vest at the rate of 20% of the total number
of shares subject to the options on each anniversary of the
vesting commencement date. No option may be transferred by the
optionee other than by will or the laws of descent or
distribution. Each option may be exercised during the lifetime
of the optionee only by such optionee. Generally, options
granted under the 2003 stock plan remain exercisable for
12 months following the termination of service of an
optionee by reason of death or disability and remain exercisable
for 3 months upon a termination of service for any other
reason. The 2003 stock plan provides that in the event of a
recapitalization, stock split or similar capital transaction, we
will make appropriate adjustments in order to preserve the
benefits of options outstanding under the plan. If we are
involved in a merger or consolidation, options granted under the
2003 stock plan will fully vest immediately prior to the
effective date of such transaction, unless the surviving or
acquiring company assumes or substitutes an equivalent option or
right for them.
87
2004
Stock Plan
General.
Our 2004 stock plan was adopted by
our board of directors and approved by our shareholders in
July 2004.
Administration.
The compensation committee of
our board of directors administers the 2004 stock plan. The 2004
stock plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options
within the meaning of Section 422 to employees, officers
and employee directors and the granting of nonstatutory stock
options to employees, officers, directors (including
non-employee directors) and consultants. The administrator
determines to whom to grant options, the number of shares under
the options, the fair market value of our common stock, the term
of options, which is prohibited from exceeding 10 years
(five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to
10% holders) and other terms and conditions. Under our 2004
stock plan, incentive stock options must be granted with an
exercise price of at least 100% of the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant, and nonstatutory options must
be granted with an exercise price of at least 85% of the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Incentive
stock options and nonstatutory stock options granted to 10%
holders must have an exercise price of at least 110% of the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. No
incentive stock option can be granted to an employee if as a
result of the grant, the employee would have the right in any
calendar year to exercise for the first time one or more
incentive stock options for shares having an aggregate fair
market value in excess of $100,000.
Authorized Shares.
Under our 2004 stock plan,
we reserved 6,000,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance. As of June 30, 2006, 2,257,243 shares of
common stock remained available for future issuance under our
2004 stock plan. As of June 30, 2006, options to purchase a
total of 3,502,756 shares of common stock were outstanding
under the 2004 stock plan at a weighted average exercise price
of $1.97 per share. Our board determined that no additional
grants under the 2004 stock plan will be made following the
completion of this offering.
Plan Features.
Options granted under the 2004
stock plan generally vest at the rate of 20% of the total number
of shares subject to the options on each anniversary of the
vesting commencement date. No option may be transferred by the
optionee other than by will or the laws of descent or
distribution. Each option may be exercised during the lifetime
of the optionee only by such optionee. Generally, options
granted under the 2004 stock plan remain exercisable for
6 months following the termination of service of an
optionee by reason of death or disability and remain exercisable
for between 30 days and 3 months upon a termination of
service for any other reason. The exercise period for
nonstatutory stock options may be extended for 6 months. An
optionee must execute a shareholders agreement with us prior to
the receipt of shares pursuant to the exercise of options
granted under our 2004 stock plan. The 2004 stock plan provides
that in the event of a recapitalization, stock split or similar
capital transaction, we will make appropriate adjustments in
order to preserve the benefits of options outstanding under the
plan. If we are involved in a merger or consolidation, options
granted under the 2004 stock plan will fully vest immediately
prior to the effective date of such transaction, unless the
surviving or acquiring company assumes or substitutes an
equivalent option for them.
2006
Stock Incentive Plan
General.
Our 2006 stock incentive plan was
adopted by our board of directors in August 2006, subject to
stockholder approval, and will become effective upon the
completion of this offering.
The 2006 stock plan provides for the granting of incentive stock
options within the meaning of Section 422 to employees and
the granting of nonstatutory stock options to employees,
non-employee directors, advisors, and consultants. The 2006
stock incentive plan also provides for grants of restricted
stock, stock appreciation rights and stock units awards to
employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Stock Options.
The compensation committee, a
plan administrator, determines to whom to grant awards, the
number of shares under the awards, the fair market value of our
common stock, the term of options, which is prohibited from
exceeding 10 years (five years in the case of an incentive
stock option granted to 10% holders) and other terms and
conditions. Under our 2006 stock plan, incentive stock options
must be granted with an exercise price of at least 100% of the
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and
nonstatutory options must be granted with an exercise price of
at least 85% of the fair market
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
value of our common stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock
options and nonstatutory stock options granted 10% holders must
have an exercise price of at least 110% of the fair market value
of our common stock on the date of grant. No incentive stock
option can be granted to an employee if as a result of the
grant, the employee would have the right in any calendar year to
exercise for the first time one or more incentive stock options
for shares having an aggregate fair market value in excess of
$100,000. The exercise price for the shares of common stock
subject to option grants made under our 2006 stock plan may be
paid in cash or in shares of our common stock held by the
optionee. The option may be exercised through a same-day sale
program without any cash outlay by the optionee. In addition,
the administrator may provide financial assistance to an
optionee, provided such optionee is not an executive officer or
board member, in the exercise of the optionee’s outstanding
options by allowing such individual to deliver a full-recourse,
interest-bearing promissory note in payment of the exercise
price and any associated withholding taxes incurred in
connection with such exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Restricted Stock.
Participants who are granted
restricted stock awards generally have all of the rights of a
stockholder with respect to such stock. Restricted stock may
generally be subject to a repurchase right by us in the event
the recipient ceases to be employed. Restricted stock may be
issued for consideration determined by the compensation
committee, including cash, promissory notes and past or future
services. Restricted Stock may be subject to vesting over time
or upon achievement of milestones.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Stock Units.
Stock units are denominated in
unit equivalent of shares of our common stock. They are
typically awarded to participants without payment of
consideration, but are subject to vesting conditions based upon
a vesting schedule or performance criteria established by the
plan administrator. Unlike restricted stock, the stock
underlying stock units will not be issued until the stock units
have vested, and recipients of stock units generally will have
no voting or dividend rights prior to the time the vesting
conditions are satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Stock Appreciation Rights.
Stock appreciation
rights may be granted independently or in consideration of a
reduction in the recipient’s compensation. Stock
appreciation rights typically will provide for payments to the
holder based upon increases in the price of our common stock
over the exercise price of the related option. The exercise
price of a stock appreciation right will be determined by the
committee and may vary in accordance with a predetermined
formula while the stock appreciation right is outstanding. The
plan administrator may elect to pay stock appreciation rights in
cash or in common stock or in a combination of cash and common
stock.
|
Administration.
The compensation committee of
our board of directors will administer the 2006 stock plan. Our
board of directors may appoint one or more separate committees
of our board of directors, each consisting of one or more
members of our board of directors, to administer our 2006 stock
plan with respect to participants other than employees who are
subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Our board of
directors may also authorize one or more officers to designate
employees, other than employees who are subject to
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, to receive awards under our
2006 stock plan
and/or
to
determine the number of such awards to be received by such
employees subject to limits specified by our board of directors.
Authorized Shares.
Under our 2006 stock
plan, shares
of our common stock have been authorized for issuance. Shares
subject to awards that expire unexercised or are forfeited or
terminated will again become available for issuance under the
2006 stock plan. No participant in the 2006 stock plan can
receive option grants, restricted shares, stock appreciation
rights or stock units for more
than shares
total in any calendar year.
Plan Features.
Under the 2006 stock plan:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Nondiscretionary, automatic grants of nonstatutory stock options
will be made to outside directors. Any current outside director
and any outside director joining our board of directors after
August 25, 2006 will be granted automatically an initial
option to purchase 50,000 shares upon first becoming a
member of our board. The initial option will vest and become
exercisable over three years, with the first
one-third
of
the shares subject to the initial option vesting on the first
anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting
monthly thereafter. Immediately after each of our regularly
scheduled annual meetings of stockholders, each outside director
will be automatically granted a nonstatutory option to
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock, provided the
director has served on our board for at least six months. Each
annual option will vest and become exercisable monthly over the
course of 12 months from the grant date. The options
granted to outside directors will have a per share exercise
price equal to 100% of the fair market value of the underlying
shares on the date of grant, and will become fully vested if we
are subject to a change of control.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Generally, if we merge with or into another corporation, we may
accelerate the vesting or exercisability of outstanding options
and terminate any unexercised options unless they are assumed or
substituted for by any surviving entity or a parent or
subsidiary of the surviving entity.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
The administrator may permit or require a participant have cash
otherwise payable to a participant on exercise of a stock
appreciation right or settlement of stock units credited to a
deferred compensation account, have shares that would otherwise
be deliverable to a participant on exercise of an option or
stock appreciation right converted into an equal number of stock
units or have shares otherwise deliverable upon exercise of an
option or stock appreciation right or settlement of stock units
converted into amounts credited to a deferred compensation
account.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Awards under our 2006 stock plan may provide for the number of
shares of our common stock or other benefits granted, issued,
retained or vested under the award are subject to the attainment
of performance criteria including cash flow, earnings per share,
earnings before interest, taxes and amortization, return on
equity, total stockholder return, share price performance,
return on capital, return on assets or net assets, revenue,
income or net income, operating income or net operating income,
operating profit or net operating profit, operating margin or
profit shares. The administrator may structure such awards to be
qualified performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
The 2006 stock plan terminates ten years after its initial
adoption, unless terminated earlier by the board. The board of
directors may amend or terminate the plan at any time, subject
to stockholder approval where required by applicable law. Any
amendment or termination may not impair the rights of holders of
outstanding awards without their consent.
|
SIMPLE
IRA Plan
We sponsor a SIMPLE IRA plan under which employees may choose to
make salary reduction contributions, and we make matching
contributions up to 3% of the employee’s compensation for
the year. All contributions are made directly to an individual
retirement account established for each employee.
Indemnification
Agreements
We intend to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors
and executive officers following our reincorporation in
Delaware. We believe that these provisions and agreements are
necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors
and executive officers. Our certificate of incorporation and our
bylaws contain provisions that limit the liability of our
directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted
by Delaware law. A description of these provisions is contained
under the heading “Description of Common Stock —
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification Matters.”
We have an insurance policy covering our directors and officers
with respect to specified liabilities, including liabilities
arising under the Securities Act, or otherwise. Insofar as
indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and persons controlling
us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed
that in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is
therefore unenforceable.
90
Advisory
Boards
We have two advisory boards: Medical and Business Advisory Board
and Clinical Investigational Board. We rely extensively on our
physician advisors to advise on marketing and research and
development efforts and provide information and data on the
clinical use of our products. At least once per year we meet
with each advisory board and each member is available to us as
needed.
Our Medical and Business Advisory Board assists us in the
following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
prioritizing medical markets in terms of where our product can
be the most effective, the speed with which they can be
introduced and the scope of the problem in the market;
|
|
|
•
|
prioritizing physician clinical studies;
|
|
|
•
|
identifying clinical studies to be pursued;
|
|
|
•
|
providing introductions to wound care specialists in the United
States and Europe;
|
|
|
•
|
advising regarding the success of our products in various market
segments;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and commenting on the specific protocols being
considered;
|
|
|
•
|
providing guidance on how best to educate and encourage the
medical community to adopt our product as the standard of care
in wound management;
|
|
|
•
|
providing input to potential collaborators on the application
and effectiveness of our products; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
participating in physician clinical studies and presenting the
results to other physicians.
|
Our Medical and Business Advisory Board is currently comprised
of the following individuals:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Position
|
|
Don C. Wukasch, M.D.
|
|
Cardiovascular Surgery
|
|
Fellow, American College of
Surgeons and American College of Cardiology
|
Barnett L. Cline, M.D.
M.P.H., Ph.D.
|
|
Tropical Medicine
|
|
Tulane University Professor of
Tropical Medicine, Emeritus; member, Armed Forces
Epidemiological Board
|
Paul L. Schnur, M.D.
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|
|
Consultant, Plastic Surgery
Division, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale; Associate Professor,
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
|
Bruce C. Wilson, M.D.,
F.A.C.C.
|
|
Cardiology
|
|
Fellow, American College of
Cardiology; Chairman, Heart Hospital of Milwaukee; Assistant
Professor of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin
|
Gerald L. Woolam, M.D.
|
|
General Surgery
|
|
Professor of Surgery, Texas Tech
University
|
Philip J. Kearney
|
|
not applicable
|
|
Assistant United States Attorney
|
David E. Allie, M.D.
|
|
Cardiothoracic and Endovascular
Surgery
|
|
Chief of Cardiothoracic and
Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Lafayette; Director, Vascular Surgery and Noninvasive Vascular
Labs Houma
|
Luca Dalla Paola, M.D.
|
|
Endrocrinologist and Surgery
|
|
Chief of the Diabetic Foot Unit of
Presidio Ospedaliero Abano Terme Hospital; Professor, Bologna
University School of Medicine
|
91
Our Clinical Investigational Board assists us by introducing us
to practicing physicians and key opinion leaders in our target
markets and reviewing physician clinical studies. The Clinical
Investigational Board is currently comprised of the following
individuals:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Position
|
|
Gerald Keusch, M.D.
|
|
Infectious Disease
|
|
Associate Dean of Global Health,
Professor of Medicine, Boston University
|
Richard Marks, M.D.
|
|
Foot and Ankle Surgery
|
|
Associate Professor of Orthopedic
Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
|
Akito
Ohmura, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Anesthesiology
|
|
Head of Medical ISO Committee
Japan; Dean, Teikyo University School of Medicine
|
All of our physician advisors serve one or five-year terms. All
of our physician advisors are employed by employers other than
us and may have commitments or consulting arrangements with
other companies, including our competitors, that may limit their
availability to consult for us. Although these advisors may
contribute significantly to our affairs, we generally do not
expect them to devote more than a small portion of their time to
us.
Advisory
Board Compensation
We pay each of the members on the Medical and Business Advisory
Board a quarterly stipend, except for Dr. Allie and Mr.
Kearney. Drs. Cline, Schnur, Woolam, Dalla Paola and Wilson
each receive $3,000 per quarter and Dr. Wukasch receives
$6,000 per quarter. We also have a consulting agreement with
Dr. Wilson and pay him an additional $12,000 per quarter
pursuant to this agreement. Although Dr. Allie does not
receive a quarterly stipend, we paid Dr. Allie $10,000 and
issued him 50,000 shares of our common stock as payment for
our participation in the 2005 New Cardiovascular Horizons
Conference, of which Dr. Allie served as conference
co-chairman. In addition, we granted each of our physician
advisors, except for Dr. Dalla Paola, warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock with a conversion price of
$4.50 per share. Dr. Allie has a warrant to purchase
10,000 shares, Drs. Cline, Schnur, Wilson and Woolam
each have a warrant to purchase 15,000 shares, and
Dr. Wukasch has a warrant to purchase 25,000 shares.
We also compensate our Medical Advisory Board members for
physician clinical studies they conduct for us.
We do not provide cash compensation to members of our Clinical
Investigation Board. However, we granted Drs. Keusch and
Marks each a warrant to purchase 10,000 shares with a
conversion price of $4.50 per share. We also granted
Dr. Ohmura an option to purchase 10,000 shares of our
common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. This
option will not vest fully until October 2008.
92
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We issued promissory notes to Akihisa Akao, one of our
directors, in May 1999, December 1999 and February 2003 in the
amount of $15,000 bearing interest at a rate of 8% per
annum, $200,000 bearing interest at a rate of 8% per annum,
and $40,000 bearing interest at a rate of 10% per annum,
respectively. These obligations were repaid in October 2004.
We entered into a one year consulting agreement with White Moon
Medical, a company formed under the laws of Japan, in October
2005. Mr. Akihisa Akao is the sole stockholder of White
Moon Medical. Under the terms of the agreement, White Moon
Medical provides us with merger and acquisition strategy and
technology support in Asia, particularly in Japan. We have
agreed to pay White Moon Medical an annual consulting fee of
$146,000, and White Moon Medical is also eligible for additional
bonuses. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon
30 days written notice. Payments to White Moon Medical
through August 31, 2006 amounted to $135,840.
We issued a promissory note to Richard Conley, one of our
directors, in February 2003 in the amount of $40,000 bearing
interest at a rate of 10% per annum. This note was
convertible at any time by Mr. Conley into
40,000 shares of either common stock or Series A
preferred stock. On June 30, 2005, Mr. Conley
converted this note into an aggregate of 40,000 shares of
our Series A preferred stock at a conversion price of
$1.00 per share.
In accordance with the terms of the underlying option
agreements, the vesting of options to purchase
340,248 shares of our common stock granted to our directors
will be accelerated upon completion of this offering.
In connection with the termination of Robert Miller’s
prior consulting agreement, we have agreed to grant him a
fully-vested option to purchase 240,000 shares of our
common stock at $0.75 per share upon completion of this
offering. Assuming an initial public offering price of
$ , we would recognize
approximately $ of stock-based
compensation expense related to this option grant.
We entered into a managing dealer agreement with Brookstreet
Securities Corporation, or Brookstreet, in May 2006, as
amended, pursuant to which Brookstreet acted as managing dealer,
on a best-efforts basis, for the sale of units of our
securities. Each unit consisted of one share of our
Series C convertible preferred stock, and a warrant to
purchase that number of shares of our common stock equal to
one-fifth of the number of Series C shares underlying the
unit, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. In connection
with the Series C Financing, we paid to Brookstreet
$152,170 in commissions and issued to Brookstreet fully vested
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 42,269 shares of our
common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. In
addition, we paid Brookstreet $10,000 upon the execution of a
term sheet regarding the terms of this offering, and an
additional $10,000 on May 31, 2006, to defray the costs
associated with the solicitation of stockholder approval.
Brookstreet also acted as managing dealer in the sale of our
Series A convertible preferred stock and our Series B
convertible preferred stock. In connection with the
Series A convertible preferred stock offering, we paid
Brookstreet $1,123,746 in commissions and issued Brookstreet and
its affiliates warrants to purchase an aggregate of
1,735,123 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price
of $0.75 per share. In connection with the Series B
convertible preferred stock offering, we paid Brookstreet
$3,413,818 in commissions and issued Brookstreet and its
affiliates warrants to purchase an aggregate of
1,317,933 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $4.50 per share.
We intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our
directors and executive officers in connection with our
reincorporation in Delaware.
93
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information as of
September 15, 2006 regarding the number of shares and the
percentage of common stock beneficially owned before and after
the completion of this offering by:
|
|
|
|
•
|
each of our directors and named executive officers listed above
in the summary compensation table; and
|
|
|
•
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
We are not aware of any owners of more than 5% of our common
stock other than Messrs. Alimi and Akao. We have determined
beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC.
Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on
the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities
named in the table below have sole voting and investment power
with respect to all shares of common stock that they
beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.
For purposes of the table below, we have assumed that
33,163,802 shares of common stock are issued and
outstanding prior to the completion of this offering
and shares
of common stock issued and outstanding upon completion of this
offering. In computing the number of shares of common stock
beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of
that person, we deemed outstanding shares of common stock
subject to all derivative securities held by that person that
are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
September 15, 2006 and shares of common stock subject to
options that vest upon completion of this offering. We did not
deem these shares outstanding; however, for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Outstanding
|
|
Name of Beneficial
Owner(1)
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Before the Offering
|
|
|
After the Offering
|
|
|
5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookstreet Securities Corporation
and related parties(2)
|
|
|
3,131,436
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hojabr Alimi(3)
|
|
|
5,756,116
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Miller(4)
|
|
|
780,672
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
James Schutz(5)
|
|
|
290,416
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theresa Mitchell(6)
|
|
|
83,874
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Thornton(7)
|
|
|
101,208
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akihisa Akao(8)
|
|
|
2,164,616
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Brown(9)
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Conley(10)
|
|
|
754,616
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory French(11)
|
|
|
294,033
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (9 persons)(12)
|
|
|
10,425,551
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise noted, the address of each beneficial owner
listed in the table is: c/o Oculus Innovative Sciences,
Inc., 1129 N. McDowell Boulevard, Petaluma, California
94954.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Principal address is 2361 Campus Drive, Suite 210, Irvine,
California 92612. Consists of shares issuable under warrants
that are immediately exercisable.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 1,689,804 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006 and 31,312 shares issuable upon exercise of options that
will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 300,672 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006, 240,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options to
be granted upon completion of
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
this offering and 200,000 shares held by The Miller 2005
Grandchildren’s Trust, for which Mr. Miller is a
trustee.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 275,416 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006 and 15,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of 83,874 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Consists of 101,208 shares issuable upon exercise of
options that are exercisable within 60 days of
September 15, 2006.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 43,647 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006 and 31,312 shares issuable upon exercise of options that
will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Consists of 200,000 shares issued upon exercise of options
that will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 563,304 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006 and 31,312 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 120,064 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006 and 31,312 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes 3,177,989 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 15,
2006 and 580,248 shares issuable upon exercise of options
that will become exercisable upon completion of this offering.
|
95
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
Upon completion of this offering, our authorized capital stock
will consist of 100,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.0001 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The following
describes our common stock and preferred stock and certain
provisions of our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws as
will be in effect upon the completion of this offering and
assumes our reincorporation in Delaware.
Common
Stock
As of September 15, 2006, there were 33,163,802 shares
of common stock outstanding held by approximately 625
stockholders of record assuming the automatic conversion of each
outstanding share of preferred stock upon the closing of this
offering.
Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each
share of common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders. We have not provided for cumulative voting for the
election of directors in our certificate of incorporation. This
means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can
elect all of the directors then standing for election. Subject
to preferences that may apply to shares of preferred stock
outstanding at the time, the holders of outstanding shares of
our common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets
legally available at the times and in the amounts that our board
of directors may determine from time to time.
Holders of common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights
or other subscription rights. Upon our liquidation, dissolution
or winding-up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share
in all assets remaining after payment of all liabilities and the
liquidation preferences of any outstanding preferred stock. Each
outstanding share of common stock is and all shares of common
stock to be issued in this offering, when they are paid for will
be, fully paid and nonassessable.
Preferred
Stock
Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will be
authorized, subject to limitations imposed by Delaware law, to
issue up to a total of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock
in one or more series, without stockholder approval. Our board
is authorized to establish from time to time the number of
shares to be included in each series, and to fix the rights,
preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued
series and any of its qualifications, limitations or
restrictions. Our board can also increase or decrease the number
of shares of any series, but not below the number of shares of
that series then outstanding, without any further vote or action
by the stockholders.
The board may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could harm the voting power or
other rights of the holders of the common stock. The issuance of
preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with
possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among
other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in control of us and might harm the market
price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of the
holders of common stock. We have no current plans to issue any
shares of preferred stock.
Registration
Rights
Upon completion of this offering, the holders of
16,272,874 shares of common stock issued upon conversion of
the preferred stock will be entitled to contractual rights to
require us to register those shares under the Securities Act. If
we propose to register any of our securities under the
Securities Act for our own account or the account of a security
holder, other than on a
Form S-8,
holders of those shares are entitled to include their shares in
our registration, provided, among other conditions, that the
underwriters of any such offering have the right to limit the
number of shares included in the registration. Six months after
the effective date of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, and subject to limitations and conditions
96
specified in the investor rights agreement with the holders,
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued upon
conversion of the preferred stock may require us to prepare and
file a registration statement under the Securities Act at our
expense covering those shares. We are not obligated to effect
more than one of these stockholder-initiated registrations.
Upon completion of this offering, the holders of
352,804 shares of common stock issued upon conversion of
the preferred stock issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants
will be entitled to contractual rights to require us to register
those shares under the Securities Act. If we propose to register
any of our securities under the Securities Act for our own
account or the account of a security holder, other than on a
Form S-8, on a form in which the common stock issued upon
conversion of the preferred stock may be included, holders of
those shares are entitled to include their shares in our
registration, provided, among other conditions, that the
underwriters of any such offering have the right to limit the
number of shares included in the registration. Six months after
the effective date of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, and subject to limitations and conditions
specified in the investor rights agreement or managing dealer
warrant agreement with the holders, holders of a majority of the
shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the preferred
stock issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants may require us
to prepare and file a registration statement under the
Securities Act at our expense covering those shares. We are not
obligated to effect more than one of these stockholder-initiated
registrations.
Upon completion of this offering, the holders of 3,539,492
shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of warrants will
be entitled to contractual rights to require us to register
those shares under the Securities Act. If we propose to register
any of our securities under the Securities Act for our own
account, holders of those shares are entitled to include their
shares in our registration, provided, among other conditions,
that the underwriters of any such offering have the right to
limit the number of shares included in the registration.
Anti-Takeover
Effects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws
The provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation
and our bylaws described below may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or discouraging another party from acquiring control
of us.
Delaware
Law
We will be subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, or Delaware law, regulating
corporate takeovers. In general, these provisions prohibit a
Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination
with any interested stockholder for a period of three years
following the date that the stockholder became an interested
stockholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
•
|
either the business combination or the transaction that resulted
in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder is
approved by our board of directors before the date the
interested stockholder attained that status;
|
|
|
•
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the
interested stockholder) those shares owned (i) by persons
who are directors and also officers and (ii) employee stock
plans in which employee participants do not have the right to
determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan
will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
•
|
on or after that date, the business combination is approved by
our board of directors and authorized at a meeting of
stockholders, and not by written consent, by at least two-thirds
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Section 203 defines “business combination” to
include the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the
interested stockholder;
|
97
|
|
|
|
•
|
any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more
of the assets of the corporation involving the interested
stockholder;
|
|
|
•
|
subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in
the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the
corporation to the interested stockholder:
|
|
|
•
|
any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of
increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class or
series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested
stockholder; or
|
|
|
•
|
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any
loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits
provided by or through the corporation.
|
In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder
as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of the corporation and any entity or
person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by any of
these entities or persons.
A Delaware corporation may opt out of this provision either with
an express provision in its original certificate of
incorporation or in an amendment to its certificate of
incorporation or bylaws approved by its stockholders. However,
we have not opted out of this provision. The statute could
prohibit or delay mergers or other takeover or change in control
attempts and, accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire us.
Charter
and Bylaws
Following the completion of this offering, our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws will provide that:
|
|
|
|
•
|
no action can be taken by stockholders except at an annual or
special meeting of the stockholders called in accordance with
our bylaws, and stockholders may not act by written consent;
|
|
|
•
|
our board of directors will be expressly authorized to make,
alter or repeal our bylaws;
|
|
|
•
|
stockholders may not call special meetings of the stockholders
or fill vacancies on the board;
|
|
|
•
|
our board of directors will be divided into three classes
serving staggered three-year terms, with one class of directors
being elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and the
other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective
terms;
|
|
|
•
|
our board of directors will be authorized to issue preferred
stock without stockholder approval; and
|
|
|
•
|
we will indemnify officers and directors against losses that
they may incur in investigations and legal proceedings resulting
from their services to us, which may include services in
connection with takeover defense measures.
|
In addition, so long as a single or related group of
stockholders continue to own at least one-third of our
outstanding common stock, a transaction between us and any
person or entity in which such stockholder or stockholders have
a material interest, if required under applicable federal and
state law or Nasdaq rules to be approved by our stockholders,
will require approval of a majority of the outstanding shares
not held by such interested stockholders present in person or by
proxy at the meeting of stockholders held with respect to such
transaction.
Limitation
of Liability and Indemnification Matters
We intend to adopt provisions in our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws that limit the liability of our
directors for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary
duty as directors, except for liability that cannot be
eliminated under Delaware law. Under Delaware law, our directors
have a fiduciary duty to us which will not be eliminated by this
provision in our certificate of incorporation. In addition, each
of our directors will continue to be subject to liability under
Delaware law for breach of the director’s duty of loyalty
to us for acts or omissions which are found by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law for actions
leading to improper personal benefit to the director and for
payment of dividends or approval of stock repurchases or
redemptions that are prohibited by
98
Delaware law. This provision does not affect the directors’
responsibilities under any other laws, such as the Federal
securities laws.
Delaware law permits a corporation to not hold its directors
personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their
fiduciary duty as directors, except for liability for the
following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the
corporation or its stockholders;
|
|
|
•
|
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
•
|
unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions; or
|
|
|
•
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities
arising under the federal or state securities laws and does not
affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive
relief or rescission. Any amendment or repeal of these
provisions requires the approval of the holders of shares
representing at least two-thirds of our shares entitled to vote
in the election of directors, voting as one class.
Delaware law provides that the indemnification permitted
thereunder shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to
which the directors and officers may be entitled under our
bylaws, any agreement, and a vote of stockholders or otherwise.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws will
eliminate the personal liability of directors to the maximum
extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws will provide that we may fully
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding (whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative) by reason of the fact that such person is or was
one of our directors, officers, employees or other agents,
against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding.
We have entered into separate indemnification agreements with
our directors and executive officers that could require us,
among other things, to indemnify them against certain
liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service
as directors and to advance their expenses incurred as a result
of any proceeding against them as to which they could be
indemnified. We believe that the limitation of liability
provision in our certificate of incorporation and the
indemnification agreements will facilitate our ability to
continue to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as
directors and officers. Our bylaws also permit us to secure
insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other
agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions,
regardless of whether Delaware law would permit indemnification.
We have purchased liability insurance for our officers and
directors.
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding
involving any director, officer, employee or agent as to which
indemnification will be required or permitted under our
certificate of incorporation. We are not aware of any threatened
litigation or proceeding that may result in a claim for such
indemnification.
Nasdaq
Symbol
We have applied for quotation of our common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Market under the symbol “OCLS.”
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Mellon
Investor Services LLC.
99
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market
sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale will have
on the market price prevailing from time to time. As described
below, only a limited number of shares will be available for
sale shortly after this offering due to contractual and legal
restrictions on resale. Nevertheless, sales of our common stock
in the public market after the restrictions lapse, or the
perception that those sales may occur, could cause the
prevailing market price to decrease or to be lower than it might
be in the absence of those sales of perceptions and could impair
our ability to obtain future capital.
Sale of
Restricted Shares
Upon completion of this offering, we will have
outstanding shares of common
stock, assuming outstanding options or warrants are not
exercised prior to the completion of this offering. Of these
outstanding shares, all of
the shares
of common stock being sold in this offering will be freely
tradable, other than by any of our “affiliates” as
defined in Rule 144(a) under the Securities Act, without
restriction or registration under the Securities Act. All
remaining shares were issued and sold by us in private
transactions and are eligible for public sale only if registered
under the Securities Act or sold in accordance with
Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act. These
remaining shares are “restricted shares” within the
meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
Lock-Up
Agreements
Our directors and executive officers and certain of our other
stockholders who collectively hold an aggregate of
32,097,401 shares, or % of our outstanding
common stock, have agreed that they will not sell any common
stock owned by them without the prior written consent of A.G.
Edwards & Sons, Inc. and Jefferies & Company, Inc.
for a period of at least 180 days after the date of this
prospectus. To the extent shares are released before the
expiration of the
lock-up
period and these shares are sold into the market, the market
price of our common stock could decline. As a result of the
lock-up
agreements described above and the provisions of Rules 144,
144(k) and 701, the restricted shares will be available for sale
in the public market as follows:
• 1,066,400 shares will be eligible for sale
immediately following the date of this prospectus;
• 32,097,401 shares will be eligible for sale upon the
expiration of the
lock-up
agreements, described above, beginning 180 days after the
date of this prospectus; and
• 4,287,414 shares will be eligible for sale upon the
exercise of vested options, beginning 180 days after the
date of this prospectus.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a
person deemed to be our affiliate, or a person holding
restricted shares who beneficially owns shares that were not
acquired from us or any of our affiliates within the previous
one year, unless Rule 144(k) is available as described below,
would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number
of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
•
|
1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, or
approximately shares
immediately after this offering, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters’ over-allotment option; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the date on which notice of the sale is filed with the SEC.
|
Sales under Rule 144, however, are subject to specific
manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and the
availability of current public information about our company. We
cannot estimate the number of shares of
100
common stock our existing stockholders will sell under
Rule 144 as this will depend on the market price of our
common stock, the personal circumstances of the stockholders and
other factors.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), in general, a stockholder who has
beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least two
years and who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of our
company at any time during the immediately preceding
90 days may sell shares without complying with the manner
of sale provisions, notice requirements, public information
requirements or volume limitations of Rule 144.
Rule 701
Subject to various limitations on the aggregate offering price
of a transaction and other conditions, Rule 701 may be
relied upon with respect to the resale of securities originally
purchased from us by our employees, directors, officers,
consultants or advisers prior to the completion of this
offering, pursuant to written compensatory benefit plans or
written contracts relating to the compensation of such persons.
In addition, the SEC has indicated that Rule 701 will apply
to stock options granted by us before this offering, along with
the shares acquired upon exercise of those options. Securities
issued in reliance on Rule 701 are deemed to be restricted
shares and, beginning 90 days after the date of this
prospectus, unless subject to the contractual restrictions
described above, one share may be sold by persons other than
affiliates subject only to the manner of sale provisions of
Rule 144 and no shares may be sold by affiliates under
Rule 144 without compliance with the one-year minimum
holding period requirements.
Stock
Options
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering
approximately shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under our stock option
plans. Accordingly, the shares of common stock registered under
this registration statement will be available for sale in the
open market upon exercise by the holders, unless those shares
are subject to vesting restrictions with us or the contractual
restrictions described above.
Registration
Rights
In addition, upon completion of this offering, the holders of
approximately 16,272,874 shares of common stock will be
entitled to cause us to register the sale of those shares under
the Securities Act. Registration of these shares under the
Securities Act would result in these shares, other than shares
purchased by our affiliates, becoming freely tradable without
restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the
effectiveness of the registration. See “Description of
Capital Stock — Registration Rights.”
101
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting
agreement among us and the underwriters, each underwriter has
severally agreed to purchase from us the following respective
number of shares of common stock at the offering price less the
underwriting discount set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies & Company,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
First Albany Capital Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
C.E. Unterberg, Towbin, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriters are subject to certain conditions precedent and
that the underwriters will purchase all such shares of the
common stock if any of these shares are purchased. The
underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares
of common stock offered hereby, other than those covered by the
over-allotment option described below, if any are taken.
The underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the
shares of common stock to the public at the offering price set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to certain
dealers at such price less a concession not in excess of
$ per share. The underwriters
may allow, and such dealers may re-allow, a concession not in
excess of $ per share to
certain other dealers. If all the shares are not sold at the
initial offering price, the underwriters may change the offering
price and other selling terms.
Pursuant to the underwriting agreement, we have granted to the
underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days after the
date of this prospectus, to purchase up
to
additional shares of common stock from us, at the offering
price, less the underwriting discount set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus, solely to cover over-allotments.
To the extent that the underwriters exercise such option, each
underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain
conditions, to purchase approximately the same percentage of
such additional shares as the number set forth next to the
underwriter’s name in the preceding table bears to the
total number of shares in the table, and we will be obligated,
pursuant to the option, to sell such shares to the underwriters.
We, our directors and executive officers and certain of our
other stockholders have agreed that during the
180-day
period after the date of this prospectus, subject to limited
exceptions, we and they will not, without the prior written
consent of A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. and
Jefferies & Company, Inc., directly or indirectly,
issue, sell, offer, agree to sell, grant any option or contract
for the sale of, pledge, make any short sale of, maintain any
short position with respect to, establish or maintain a
“put equivalent option” (within the meaning of
Rule 16a-1(h)
under the Exchange Act) with respect to, enter into any swap,
derivative transaction or other arrangement (whether any such
transaction is to be settled by delivery of common stock, other
securities, cash or other consideration) that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership, or otherwise dispose of, any shares of our common
stock (or any securities convertible into, exercisable for or
exchangeable for our common stock or any interest therein or any
capital stock of our subsidiary). These
lock-up
agreements will cover approximately % of our
outstanding common stock in the aggregate. A.G.
Edwards & Sons, Inc. or Jefferies &
Company, Inc. may, in each of their sole discretion, allow
any of these parties to dispose of common stock or other
securities prior to the expiration of the
180-day
period. There are, however, no agreements between A.G. Edwards
& Sons, Inc. or Jefferies & Company, Inc. and the
parties that would allow them to do so as of the date of this
prospectus.
The
180-day
restricted period described above is subject to extension such
that, in the event that either (1) during the last
17 days of the
180-day
restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to
the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
period, the “lock-up” restrictions described above
will, subject to limited exceptions, continue to apply until the
102
expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of issuance of the earnings release
or the occurrence of the material news or material event.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the
common stock. The initial public offering price for the shares
of common stock included in this offering will be determined by
negotiation among us and the representatives. Among the factors
considered in determining the price will be:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the history of and prospects for our business and the industry
in which we operate;
|
|
|
•
|
an assessment of our management;
|
|
|
•
|
our past and present revenues and earnings;
|
|
|
•
|
the prospects for growth of our revenues and earnings; and
|
|
|
•
|
currently prevailing conditions in the securities markets,
including current market valuations of publicly traded companies
which are comparable to us.
|
The representatives have advised us that they do not intend to
confirm sales to any account over which they exercise
discretionary authority.
The following table summarizes the discounts and commissions to
be paid to the underwriters by us in connection with this
offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and
full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase
additional shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We expect to incur expenses of approximately
$ million in connection with
this offering.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933.
Until the distribution of the common stock is completed, rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission may limit the ability
of the underwriters and certain selling group members to bid for
and purchase the common stock. As an exception to these rules,
the underwriters are permitted to engage in certain transactions
that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the
common stock.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
coving transactions and penalty bids in accordance with
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
•
|
Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriters of
the shares of common stock in excess of the number of shares the
underwriters are obligated to purchase, which creates a
syndicate short position. The short position may be either a
covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered
short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the
underwriters is not greater than the number of shares they may
purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short
position, the number of shares involved is greater than the
number of shares in the over-allotment. The underwriters may
close out any short position by either exercising their
over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares of common stock in the open market.
|
|
|
•
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the shares
of common stock in the open market after the distribution has
been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of the shares of common stock to close
out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among
other things, the price of shares of common stock available for
purchase in the open market as
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares of
common stock through the over-allotment option. If the
underwriters sell more shares of common stock than could be
covered by the over-allotment option, a naked short position,
the position can only be closed out by buying shares of common
stock in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares of common stock
in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect
investors who purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Penalty bids permit representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the shares of common
stock originally sold by the syndicate member are purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
Similar to other purchase transactions, the underwriters’
purchases to cover the syndicate short sales may have the effect
of raising or maintaining the market price of the shares of
common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market
price of the shares of common stock. As a result, the price of
the shares of common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market.
The underwriters will deliver a prospectus to all purchasers of
shares of common stock in the short sales. The purchases of
shares of common stock in short sales are entitled to the same
remedies under the federal securities laws as any other
purchaser of shares of common stock covered by this prospectus.
Passive market making may stabilize or maintain the market price
of our common stock at a level above that which might otherwise
prevail and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
The underwriters are not obligated to engage in any of the
transactions described above. If they do engage in any of these
transactions, they may discontinue them at any time.
We have applied to list the common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbol “OCLS.”
From time to time in the ordinary course of their respective
businesses, some of the underwriters and their affiliates may in
the future engage in commercial banking or investment banking
transactions with our affiliates and us.
No Public
Offering Outside the United States
No action has been or will be taken in any jurisdiction (except
in the United States) that would permit a public offering of our
shares or the possession, circulation or distribution of this
prospectus or any other material relating to use or our shares
in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required.
Accordingly, our shares may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, and neither this prospectus nor any other offering
material or advertisements in connection with our shares may be
distributed or published, in or from any country or jurisdiction
except in compliance with any applicable rules and regulations
of any such country or jurisdiction.
Purchasers of the shares offered by this prospectus may be
required to pay stamp taxes and other charges in accordance with
the laws and practices of the country of purchase in addition to
the offering price on the cover page of this prospectus.
104
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of our common stock offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for us by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP, Palo Alto, California. Selected legal matters
relating to the offering will be passed upon for the
underwriters by Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park,
California.
EXPERTS
Our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2005
and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2006 included in this prospectus have been so
included in reliance on the report of Marcum & Kliegman
LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
Valuation Research Corporation issued our July 2005 valuation
report.
CHANGE IN
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
On April 12, 2006, the Audit Committee of our board of
directors approved the dismissal of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
or PWC, as our independent registered public accounting firm and
subsequently appointed Marcum & Kliegman LLP, or
M&K, effective April 12, 2006. We did not consult with
M&K on any accounting or financial reporting matters prior
to M&K’s appointment.
We engaged PWC on June 14, 2005, to perform an audit of our
financial statements for our fiscal years ended March 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005. PWC did not issue a report on our financial
statements for the years ended March 31, 2004 or 2005, or
through April 12, 2006. For the years ended March 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005, and through April 12, 2006, there were
no disagreements with PWC on any matter of accounting principles
or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope
or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to PWC’s
satisfaction, would have caused PWC to make reference thereto in
their report on the financial statements for such years if they
had delivered a report. In March 2006, and prior to its
dismissal, PWC advised our Audit Committee orally of the
following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the absence of financial accounting personnel with sufficient
skills and experience to effectively evaluate and determine the
appropriate accounting for non-routine
and/or
complex accounting transactions consistent with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, which
resulted in a number of material audit adjustments to the
financial statements during the course of audit procedures;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the failure to maintain effective controls to ensure the
identification of accounting issues related to and the proper
accounting for stock options with the right of rescission that
were granted under certain stock option plans that required
registration or qualification under federal and state securities
laws primarily due to insufficient oversight and lack of
personnel in the accounting and finance organization with the
appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and
training;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the failure to maintain an effective anti-fraud program designed
to detect and prevent fraudulent activities in QP;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the need to expand significantly the scope of the audit of QP to
assess the impact of identified fraudulent activities on the our
financial statements, in which regard PWC advised our audit
committee that the results of the fraud investigation may cause
PWC to be unwilling to be associated with our financial
statements;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the “tone at the top” set by our senior management
does not appear to encourage an attitude within our company that
controls are important and that established controls cannot be
circumvented;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we did not have the appropriate financial management and
reporting infrastructure in place to meet the demands that will
be placed upon us as a public company, including the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that we will
be unable to report our financial results accurately or in a
timely manner; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
significant control deficiencies, when considered in the
aggregate, constituted a material weakness over financial
reporting.
|
105
We have authorized PWC to respond fully to the inquiries of
M&K concerning the foregoing. We have taken the following
steps designed to address PWC’s concerns and to implement
the recommendations made by our special counsel to our audit
committee in connection with its investigation of QP:
|
|
|
|
•
|
we have implemented a training program to continue to educate
our finance personnel on accounting developments and the
application of accounting principles to complex transactions,
emerging and higher-risk areas and the application of
significant accounting policies and judgments;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we have implemented programs so that all employees in finance
responsible for overseeing the consolidation of financial
results of any subsidiary, foreign or domestic, have the
requisite knowledge to understand the potential issues that are
peculiarly important in dealing with our operations, including
the potential for fraud;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we will continue engaging outside consultants to provide
accounting, tax and Sarbanes-Oxley advice to our finance
personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
with regard to any future material acquisition or partnership
that does not involve a well-known entity, management will
present a written report to our board of directors concerning
the proposed transaction, including a vetting of the management
team or practices of the third party;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we are continuing our efforts to streamline our monthly closing
and reporting processes and have implemented financial statement
review procedures with the Audit Committee;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we have adopted a code of ethics for all directors, employees
and advisors in compliance with Nasdaq regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we have adopted a whistleblower policy and are implementing
procedures that will allow for anonymous reporting of any
potential violations of law; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
we have hired an experienced Chief Operating Officer to oversee
our
day-to-day
operations, further strengthening our commitment to ensure
accurate financial reporting, as well as compliance with laws
and regulations.
|
Under the oversight of our audit committee, we are continuing to
review our processes and procedures to strengthen and improve
our internal controls, with the goals of ensuring accurate
financial reporting and complying with laws and regulations
applicable to us.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement under the
Securities Act with respect to the common stock offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information
set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement. Please refer to the
registration statement, exhibits and schedules for further
information with respect to the common stock offered by this
prospectus. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding
the contents of any contract or other documents are not
necessarily complete. With respect to any contract or document
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, you should
refer to the exhibit for a copy of the contract or document, and
each statement in this prospectus regarding that contract or
document is qualified by reference to the exhibit. A copy of the
registration statement and its exhibits and schedules may be
inspected without charge at the SEC’s public reference
room, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at 1-202-551-8090 for further
information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings,
including the registration statement, are also available to the
public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Upon completion of this offering, we will be subject to the
information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and,
in accordance therewith, will file periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. Such periodic
reports, proxy statements and other information will be
available for inspection at the public reference room and
website of the SEC referred to above.
106
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
|
|
F-1
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of March 31, 2005 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended March 31, 2006. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of
March 31, 2005 and 2006, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended March 31, 2006 in conformity with United
States generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Marcum
& Kliegman
llp
New York, New York
June 21, 2006
F-2
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,287
|
|
|
$
|
7,448
|
|
|
$
|
6,134
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,881
|
|
|
|
10,227
|
|
|
|
9,215
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Debt issue costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,940
|
|
|
$
|
12,689
|
|
|
$
|
13,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
2,774
|
|
|
$
|
2,057
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
Dividend payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Current portion of capital lease
obligations
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
5,822
|
|
Long-term debt, less current
portion
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less
current portion
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments, Contingencies and
Other Matters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, no
par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
5,351,244 shares issued and outstanding at March 31,
2005 and 5,391,244 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
Series B
4,056,568 shares issued and outstanding at March 31,
2005 and 10,543,474 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
|
|
|
16,696
|
|
|
|
43,722
|
|
|
|
43,722
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
100,000,000 shares authorized,
15,658,614 and 16,875,928 and 16,890,928 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 2006 and June 30,
2006 (unaudited), respectively
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(27,080
|
)
|
|
|
(50,300
|
)
|
|
|
(54,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
7,338
|
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
6,940
|
|
|
$
|
12,689
|
|
|
$
|
13,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
1,966
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Service
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Service
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
(2,166
|
)
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
12,492
|
|
|
|
15,933
|
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
18,533
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(7,097
|
)
|
|
|
(16,312
|
)
|
|
|
(20,851
|
)
|
|
|
(3,984
|
)
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(21,118
|
)
|
|
|
(4,065
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of
discontinued business
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
business
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(23,099
|
)
|
|
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: basic
and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares
used in per common share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
15,647
|
|
|
|
15,659
|
|
|
|
16,602
|
|
|
|
15,878
|
|
|
|
16,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,418
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(7,312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,657
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC.
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Based
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
Accum-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
ulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, April 1, 2003
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,435,112
|
|
|
$
|
2,892
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(3,252
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock, net of
offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Deferred stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Non-employee stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
in exchange for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Reclassification of options subject
to cash settlement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
in connection with debt financing
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred stock, net of offering costs
|
|
|
5,351,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2004
|
|
|
5,351,244
|
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,658,612
|
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(10,550
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
(2,765
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
Non-employee stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Reclassification of options subject
to cash settlement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
in connection with debt financing
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred stock warrants in connection with debt
financing
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
F-5
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(In
thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Based
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
Accum-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
ulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred stock, net of offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,056,568
|
|
|
|
16,696
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,696
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2005
|
|
|
5,351,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
4,056,568
|
|
|
$
|
16,696
|
|
|
|
15,658,614
|
|
|
$
|
3,101
|
|
|
$
|
3,674
|
|
|
$
|
(676
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,080
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,167,314
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Deferred stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
Non-employee stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
in exchange for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Issuance of common stock in
exchange for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Reclassification of options subject
to cash settlement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred stock, net of offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,486,906
|
|
|
|
27,026
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,026
|
|
Issuance of Series A
convertible preferred stock in connections with convertible debt
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Dividend payable to Series A
preferred stockholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(23,099
|
)
|
|
|
(23,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,391,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
10,543,474
|
|
|
$
|
43,722
|
|
|
|
16,875,928
|
|
|
$
|
3,399
|
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
(798
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(50,300
|
)
|
|
|
$7,338
|
|
The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(In
thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Based
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
Accum-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
ulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,391,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
10,543,474
|
|
|
$
|
43,722
|
|
|
|
16,875,928
|
|
|
$
|
3,399
|
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
(798
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(50,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,338
|
|
Deferred stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Non-employee stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Issuance of common stock in
exchange for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Fair value of common warrants
issued in exchange for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Issuance of Series B preferred
warrants in connection with line of credit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
Dividend payable to Series A
preferred stockholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2006
(unaudited)
|
|
|
5,391,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
10,543,474
|
|
|
$
|
43,722
|
|
|
|
16,890,928
|
|
|
$
|
3,399
|
|
|
$
|
5,667
|
|
|
$
|
(650
|
)
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
(54,718
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-7
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,297
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
from continuing operations to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(5,558
|
)
|
|
|
(13,533
|
)
|
|
|
(19,702
|
)
|
|
|
(5,022
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Issuance of note receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes in restricted cash
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
|
(1,118
|
)
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of
preferred stock
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
16,696
|
|
|
|
27,026
|
|
|
|
15,426
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from issued debt
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
(953
|
)
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
7,271
|
|
|
|
17,196
|
|
|
|
26,597
|
|
|
|
15,383
|
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Investing cash flows
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued
operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
|
|
(1,314
|
)
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of
period
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
7,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
|
$
|
3,287
|
|
|
$
|
7,448
|
|
|
$
|
13,459
|
|
|
$
|
6,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment purchased under capital
leases
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of note into
Series A preferred stock
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued with
line of credit
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-8
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 —
The Company
Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) was
incorporated under the laws of the State of California in April
1999. The Company’s principal office is located in
Petaluma, California. The Company develops, manufactures and
markets a family of products intended to prevent and eliminate
infection in acute and chronic wounds. The Company’s
platform technology, Microcyn, is a non-toxic, superoxidized
water-based solution that is designed to eliminate a wide range
of bacteria, viruses, fungi and spores without promoting the
development of resistant strains of pathogens. The Company
conducts its business worldwide, with subsidiaries in Europe and
Mexico.
As discussed in Note 18, the Company’s articles of
incorporation were amended on August 28, 2006, authorizing
it to issue up to 3,500,000 of Series C convertible
preferred stock.
NOTE 2 —
Liquidity and Financial Condition
The Company incurred net losses of $7,298,000, $16,530,000 and
$23,099,000 for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and
2006, respectively, and $4,297,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006. At March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006, the Company’s accumulated deficit amounted to
$50,300,000 and $54,718,000, respectively.
During the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the
Company raised, net of offering costs, an aggregate of
$6,837,000, $16,696,000 and $27,324,000, respectively in various
equity financing transactions that, together with the proceeds
of certain debt financing transactions, enabled it to sustain
operations while attempting to execute its business plan. The
Company had $5,127,000 of working capital as of March 31,
2006 and $3,393,000 as of June 30, 2006. In addition, in
June 2006, the Company entered into a $5,000,000 credit
facility, from which it drew $4,182,000, to fund its operations,
and invest in new equipment (Note 9).
The Company’s ability to continue its operations is
dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital and
generate revenue and operating cash flow through the execution
of its business plan. The Company is also in the process of
effectuating an initial public offering (“IPO”) of its
equity securities. The Company’s Board of Directors and
stockholders have also approved an amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to 3,500,000
shares of Series C convertible preferred stock. On
September 14, 2006, the Company sold 338,156 units,
consisting of 338,156 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 67,631 shares of
the Company’s common stock, for gross proceeds of
$1,521,702 ($1,369,532 net of offering costs). The Company
cannot provide any assurance that it will successfully raise any
additional capital under this offering as a result of the
authorization to issue these shares.
Management believes the Company’s current level of working
capital and the additional funds it expects to generate from
operations will sustain the business through March 31,
2007. However, the Company cannot provide any assurance that
unforeseen circumstances will not require it to raise additional
capital
and/or
make
operational changes in the business to conserve liquidity. If
the Company’s liquidity circumstances change materially
from management’s plan at any time during the year ending
March 31, 2007, it could be required to curtail certain
activities to reduce costs in order to sustain the business. In
the event that the Company is required to raise additional
capital, the Company cannot provide any assurance that it will
successfully secure any commitments for new financing on
acceptable terms, if at all.
NOTE 3 —
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Aquamed Technologies, Inc., Oculus Technologies of Mexico C.V.
(“OTM”), and Oculus
F-9
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Innovative Sciences B.V. (“OIS Europe”). All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in United
States Dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 52,
“Foreign Currency Translation.”
(“SFAS 52”). The Company’s subsidiary OTM
uses the local currency (Mexican Pesos) as its functional
currency and OIS Europe uses the local currency (Euro) as its
functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue
and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates
during the period. Resulting translation adjustments are
recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income.
The Company, in determining whether it is required to
consolidate investee businesses, considers both the voting and
variable interest models of consolidation as required under
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Interpretation No. 46(R) “Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities,” (“FIN 46(R)”).
Accordingly the Company consolidates investee entities when it
owns less than 50% of the voting interests but, based on the
risks and rewards of its participation, has established
financial control. As described in Note 17, the
Company’s consolidated financial statements include the
results of a variable interest entity that is being presented as
a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No. 144
“Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long Lived
Assets.”
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the
dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from these estimates. These
estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition reserves
and write-downs related to receivables and inventories, the
recoverability of long-term assets, deferred taxes and related
valuation allowances and valuation of equity instruments.
Unaudited
Interim Results
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
2006, statement of changes in stockholders’ equity
(deficit) for the three months ended June 30, 2006, and the
consolidated statements of operations and statements of cash
flows for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006 are
unaudited. The unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual
consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal
recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the
Company’s financial position and results of operations and
cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
2006. The financial data and other information disclosed in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements related to the
three month periods are unaudited. The results for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the year ending March 31,
2007 or for any other interim period or for any future year.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company generates revenue from sales of its products to
hospitals, medical centers, doctors, pharmacies, distributors
and partners. The Company sells its products directly to third
parties and to distributors through various cancelable
distribution agreements. The Company has also entered into an
agreement to license its products.
F-10
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
The Company also provides regulatory compliance testing and
quality assurance services to medical device and pharmaceutical
companies.
The Company applies the revenue recognition principles set forth
in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
(“SAB”) 104 “Revenue Recognition” with
respect to all of its revenue. Accordingly, the Company records
revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is
fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability of the sale
is reasonable assured.
The Company requires all of its product sales to be supported by
evidence of a sale transaction that clearly indicates the
selling price to the customer, shipping terms and payment terms.
Evidence of an arrangement generally consists of a contract or
purchase order approved by the customer. The Company has ongoing
relationships with certain customers from which it customarily
accepts orders by telephone in lieu of a purchase order.
The Company recognizes revenue at the time in which it receives
a confirmation that the goods were either tendered at their
destination when shipped “FOB destination,” or
transferred to a shipping agent when shipped “FOB shipping
point.” Delivery to the customer is deemed to have occurred
when the customer takes title to the product. Generally, title
passes to the customer upon shipment, but could occur when the
customer receives the product based on the terms of the
agreement with the customer.
The selling prices of all goods that the Company sells are
fixed, and agreed to with the customer, prior to shipment.
Selling prices are generally based on established list prices.
The Company does not customarily permit its customers to return
any of its products for monetary refunds or credit against
completed or future sales. The Company, from time to time, may
replace expired goods on a discretionary basis. The Company
records these types of adjustments, when made, as a reduction of
revenue. Sales adjustments were insignificant during the years
ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and for the three
months ended June 30, 2006.
The Company evaluates the creditworthiness of new customers and
monitors the creditworthiness of its existing customers to
determine whether events or changes in their financial
circumstances would raise doubt as to the collectability of a
sale at the time in which a sale is made. Payment terms on sales
made in the United States are generally 30 days and
internationally, generally range from 30 days to
180 days.
In the event a sale is made to a customer under circumstances in
which collectability is not reasonably assured, the Company
either requires the customer to remit payment prior to shipment
or defers recognition of the revenue until the time of
collection. The Company maintains a reserve for amounts which
may not be collectible.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, approximately
$434,000 of sales in Mexico were recognized when cash was
collected since collection was not reasonably assured.
The Company has entered into distribution agreements in Europe.
Recognition of revenue and related cost of revenue from product
sales is deferred until the product is sold from the
distributors to their end customers.
When the Company receives letters of credit and the terms of the
sale provide for no right of return except to replace defective
product, revenue is recognized when the letter of credit becomes
effective and the product is shipped.
Revenue from consulting contracts is recognized as services are
provided. Revenue from testing contracts is recognized as tests
are completed and a final report is sent to the customer.
F-11
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents may be invested in money market
funds, commercial paper, and certificates of deposits. Cash
equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted
Cash
In connection with operating lease agreements, the Company is
required to maintain cash deposits in a restricted account.
Restricted cash held as security under this arrangement amounted
to $45,000, $44,000 and $44,000 at March 31, 2005 and 2006,
and June 30, 2006, respectively.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents
are maintained in financial institutions in the United States,
Mexico, and The Netherlands. The Company is exposed to credit
risk in the event of default by these financial institutions for
amounts in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insured limits. Management believes that the financial
institutions that hold the Company’s deposits are
financially sound and have minimal credit risk.
The Company grants credit to its business customers, which are
primarily located in the United States, Mexico, and Europe.
Collateral is generally not required for trade receivables. The
Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses.
Accounts
Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances for
cash discounts for prompt payment, doubtful accounts, government
chargebacks and sales returns. Estimates for cash discounts,
government chargebacks and sales returns are based on
contractual terms, historical trends and expectations regarding
the utilization rates for these programs. With respect to
government chargebacks, the Mexican Ministry of Health’s
(“MOH”) policy is to levy penalties on its vendors for
product received after scheduled delivery times. The Company has
not incurred any such chargebacks to date; however such
penalties (if incurred) would be recorded as a reduction of
revenue and the related accounts receivable balance.
The Company’s policy is to reserve for uncollectible
accounts based on its best estimate of the amount of probable
credit losses in its existing accounts receivable. The Company
periodically reviews its accounts receivable to determine
whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary based on
an analysis of past due accounts and other factors that may
indicate that the realization of an account may be in doubt.
Other factors that the Company considers include its existing
contractual obligations, historical payment patterns of its
customers and individual customer circumstances, an analysis of
days sales outstanding by customer and geographic region, and a
review of the local economic environment and its potential
impact on government funding and reimbursement practices.
Account balances deemed to be uncollectible are charged to the
allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and
the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company had
a low occurrence of credit losses through 2005 and therefore did
not consider it necessary to establish an allowance for doubtful
accounts as of March 31, 2005. The allowance for doubtful
accounts at March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006
represents probable credit losses in the amounts of $90,000 and
$100,000, respectively.
F-12
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Inventories
Inventories of finished goods and raw materials are stated at
the lower of cost, determined
first-in,
first-out under a standard cost method, or market.
The Company also establishes reserves for obsolescence or
unmarketable inventory. The Company recorded reserves to reduce
the carrying amounts of inventories to their net realizable
value in the amounts of $221,000 and $996,000 for the years
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, which is
included in the accompanying statements of operations as a
component of cost of goods sold. In the three month period ended
June 30, 2006, the Company discarded inventory reserved for
in prior periods.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of property and
equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Depreciation of
leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line
method over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the
improvement or the remaining term of the lease. Useful lives by
classification is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
3
|
|
Manufacturing and other equipment
|
|
|
5
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7
|
|
Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and the
resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Maintenance
and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.
Debt
Issue Costs
Costs of obtaining lines of credit or revolving credit
arrangements (which could include cash or the fair value of
equity securities) are deferred and amortized over the term of
the related facility in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 21 “Debt Issue
Costs.” (“APB 21”).
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically reviews the carrying values of its long
lived assets in accordance with SFAS 144 “Long Lived
Assets” when events or changes in circumstances would
indicate that it is more likely than not that their carrying
values may exceed their realizable values, and records
impairment charges when considered necessary. Specific potential
indicators of impairment include, but are not necessarily
limited to:
|
|
|
|
•
|
a significant decrease in the fair value of an asset;
|
|
|
•
|
a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset
is used or a significant physical change in an asset;
|
|
|
•
|
a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate that affects the value of an asset;
|
|
|
•
|
an adverse action or assessment by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration or another regulator;
|
|
|
•
|
an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount
originally expected to acquire or construct an asset; and
operating or cash flow losses combined with a history of
operating or cash flow
|
F-13
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing
losses associated with an income-producing asset.
|
When circumstances indicate that an impairment may have
occurred, the Company tests such assets for recoverability by
comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to result from the use of such assets and their eventual
disposition to their carrying amounts. In estimating these
future cash flows, assets and liabilities are grouped at the
lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that
are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other
such groups. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than
the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss, measured
as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its
estimated fair value, will be recognized. The cash flow
estimates used in such calculations are based on estimates and
assumptions, using all available information that management
believes is reasonable.
Research
and Development
Research and development expense is charged to operations as
incurred and consists primarily of personnel expenses, outside
services and supplies. For the years ended March 31, 2004,
2005 and 2006, research and development expense amounted to
$1,413,000, $1,654,000 and $2,600,000, respectively. For the
three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006, research and
development expense amounted to $256,000 and $767,000,
respectively.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs
amounted to $99,000, $122,000 and $126,000, for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Advertising
costs amounted to $48,000 and $14,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
The Company applies the guidelines enumerated in Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue (“EITF”) 00-10 “Accounting for
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs” with respect to its
shipping and handling costs. Accordingly, the Company classifies
amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling in
sale transactions as revenue. Shipping and handling costs
incurred are recorded in cost of sales. To date, shipping and
handling costs billed to customers have been insignificant.
Foreign
Currency Transactions
Foreign currency gains (losses) relate to working capital loans
that the Company’s made to its foreign subsidiaries. The
Company recorded foreign currency gains (losses) for the years
ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 of ($4,000), $134,000,
and ($283,000), respectively, and $(24,000) and $(272,000) for
the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006,
respectively. The related gains (losses) were recorded in other
income (expense) in the accompanying statements of operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance
with the provisions of APB No. 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related interpretations
and applied the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 123.” The Company used the minimum value
method to measure the fair value of awards issued prior to
April 1, 2006 with respect to its application of the
disclosure requirements under SFAS 123.
F-14
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) “Share Based Payment”
(“SFAS 123(R)”). This statement is a revision of
SFAS Statement No. 123, and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, and its related implementation guidance.
SFAS 123R addresses all forms of share based payment
(“SBP”) awards including shares issued under employee
stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock
appreciation rights. Under SFAS 123R, SBP awards result in
a cost that will be measured at fair value on the awards’
grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are
expected to vest and will result in a charge to operations.
Under SFAS 123(R), nonpublic entities, including those that
become public entities after June 15, 2005, that used the
minimum value method of measuring equity share options and
similar instruments for either recognition or pro forma
disclosure purposes under Statement 123 are required to
apply SFAS 123(R) prospectively to new awards and to awards
modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the date of adoption.
In addition, SFAS 123(R), requires such entities to
continue accounting for any portion of awards outstanding at the
date of initial application using the accounting principles
originally applied to those awards. Accordingly, stock based
compensation expense relating to awards granted prior to
April 1, 2006 that are expected to vest in periods ending
after April 1, 2006 are being recorded in accordance with
the provisions of APB 25 and its related interpretive guidance.
The Company has adopted the prospective method with respect to
accounting for its transition to SFAS 123(R). Accordingly,
the Company recognized in salaries and related expense in the
statement of operations $52,000 of stock based compensation
expense in the three month period ended June 30, 2006,
which represents the intrinsic value of options granted prior to
April 1, 2006 that the Company is continuing to account for
using the recognition and measurement principles prescribed
under APB 25.
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss as if the
Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS 123/ SFAS 123(R) to stock-based compensation
arrangements (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
stockholders, as reported
|
|
$
|
(7,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,418
|
)
|
Add: Total stock-based employee
compensation expenses included in net loss
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation determined under the fair-value based method for
all awards
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(2,448
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
stockholders, pro forma
|
|
$
|
(7,349
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,169
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share, basic
and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
F-15
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the
fair value of each employee option granted in reporting periods
prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) was estimated on the
date of grant using the minimum value method with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
6 yrs
|
|
|
|
6 yrs
|
|
|
|
6 yrs
|
|
|
|
6 yrs
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
|
|
4.27
|
%
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Non-Employee
Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to
non-employees in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) and EITF Issue
No. 96-18,
“Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling,
Goods or Services,” which requires that such equity
instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement
date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to
periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instrument vests.
Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are amortized over
the vesting period.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(“SFAS No. 109”). Under
SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and net
operating loss and credit carryforwards using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to
impact taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected
to be realized.
Comprehensive
Loss
Other comprehensive loss includes all changes in
stockholders’ equity (deficit) during a period from
non-owner sources and is reported in the consolidated statement
of stockholders’ equity (deficit). To date, other
comprehensive loss consists of changes in accumulated foreign
currency translation adjustments during the period.
Net
Loss Per Share
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with
SFAS No. 128 “Earnings Per Share” and has
applied the guidance enumerated in Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 98 (“SAB Topic 4D”) with respect to
evaluating its issuances of equity securities during all periods
presented.
Under SFAS No. 128, basic net loss per share is
computed by dividing net loss per share available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period and excludes the effects of any
potentially dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share, if
presented, would include the dilution that would occur upon the
exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive securities
into common stock using the “treasury stock”
and/or
“if converted” methods as applicable. The computation
of basic loss per share for the years ended March 31, 2004,
2005, 2006, and the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006
excludes potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion
would be anti-dilutive.
F-16
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
In addition to the above, the SEC (under SAB Topic 4D)
requires new registrants to retroactively include the dilutive
effect of common stock or potential common stock issued for
nominal consideration during all periods presented in its
computation of basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted
earnings per share as if they were, in substance,
recapitalizations. The Company evaluated all of its issuances of
equity securities and determined that it had no nominal
issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents to include
in its computation of loss per share for any of the periods
presented.
Common stock equivalents excluded from the determination of
basic and diluted net loss per share because their effect would
be anti-dilutive are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
6,138
|
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
|
|
7,876
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
Convertible preferred stock (as if
converted)
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
9,408
|
|
|
|
15,935
|
|
|
|
13,145
|
|
|
|
15,935
|
|
Warrants to purchase preferred
Series A stock (as if converted)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Warrants to purchase preferred
Series B stock (as if converted)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,690
|
|
|
|
16,731
|
|
|
|
27,308
|
|
|
|
20,897
|
|
|
|
27,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses
approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amounts of the Company’s line of
credit obligation and other long term obligations approximate
fair value as such instruments feature contractual interest
rates that are consistent with current market rates of interest
or have effective yields that are consistent with instruments of
similar risk, when taken together with equity instruments issued
to the holder.
Convertible
Notes
The Company accounts for conversion options embedded in
convertible notes in accordance with SFAS No. 133
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (“SFAS 133”) and
EITF 00-19
“Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”
(“EITF 00-19”).
SFAS 133 generally requires companies to bifurcate
conversion options embedded in convertible notes from their host
instruments and to account for them as free standing derivative
financial instruments in accordance with
EITF 00-19.
SFAS 133 provides for an exception to this rule when the
host instruments are deemed to be conventional as that term is
described in the implementation guidance to SFAS 133 and
further clarified in
EITF 05-2
“The Meaning of “Conventional Convertible Debt
Instrument” in Issue
No. 00-19.
F-17
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
The Company accounts for convertible notes (deemed conventional)
in accordance with the provisions of EITF 98-5
“Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial
Conversion Features,” (“EITF 98-5”) and
EITF 00-27
“Application of EITF 98-5 to Certain Convertible
Instruments.” Accordingly, the Company records, as a
discount to convertible notes, the intrinsic value of such
conversion options based upon the differences between the fair
value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of
the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded
in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are
amortized over the term of the related debt to their earliest
date of redemption.
The Company’s convertible instruments do not host
conversion options that are deemed to be free standing
derivative financial instruments.
Common
Stock Purchase Warrants and Other Derivative Financial
Instruments
The Company accounts for the issuance of common stock purchase
warrants issued and other free standing derivative financial
instruments in accordance with the provisions of
EITF 00-19.
Based on the provisions of
EITF 00-19,
the Company classifies as equity any contracts that
(i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or
(ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or
settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share
settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any
contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a
requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs
and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or
(ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement
or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share
settlement).
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In EITF Issue
No. 04-8,
“The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on
Diluted Earnings per Share,” the EITF reached a consensus
that contingently convertible instruments, such as contingently
convertible debt, contingently convertible preferred stock and
other such securities should be included in diluted earnings per
share (if dilutive) regardless of whether the market price
trigger has been met. The consensus became effective for
reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have material effect on
the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections — a replacement of APB
Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3
(“SFAS 154”). This Statement replaces APB Opinion
No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and FASB Statement
No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the
accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. This Statement applies to all voluntary changes in
accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an
accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the
pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions.
When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions,
those provisions should be followed.
APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary
changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in
net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of
changing to the new accounting principle. This Statement
requires retrospective application to prior periods’
financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless
it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific
effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is
impracticable to determine the period-specific effects of an
accounting change on one or more individual prior periods
presented, this Statement requires that the new accounting
principle be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities
as of the beginning of the earliest period for which
retrospective application is practicable and that a
corresponding adjustment be made to the opening balance of
retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or
net assets in the statement of financial position) for that
period rather than being reported in an income statement. When
it is
F-18
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of applying a
change in accounting principle to all prior periods, this
Statement requires that the new accounting principle be applied
as if it were adopted prospectively from the earliest date
practicable. This Statement is effective for accounting changes
and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS 154 will have a significant effect on its
financial statements.
On June 29, 2005, the EITF ratified Issue
No. 05-2,
“The Meaning of ‘Conventional Convertible Debt
Instrument’ in EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own
Stock.’ ” EITF
Issue 05-2
provides guidance on determining whether a convertible debt
instrument is “conventional” for the purpose of
determining when an issuer is required to bifurcate a conversion
option that is embedded in convertible debt in accordance with
SFAS 133. Issue
No. 05-2
is effective for new instruments entered into and instruments
modified in reporting periods beginning after June 29,
2005. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this
pronouncement will have a significant effect on its financial
statements.
In September 2005, Issue
No. 05-4,
“The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause on a
Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own
Stock.’ ”
EITF 05-4
provides guidance to issuers as to how to account for
registration rights agreements that require an issuer to use its
“best efforts” to file a registration statement for
the resale of equity instruments and have it declared effective
by the end of a specified grace period and, if applicable,
maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement for a
period of time or pay a liquidated damage penalty to the
investor. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating
the effect that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on
its financial statements.
In September 2005, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 05-7,
“Accounting for Modifications to Conversion Options
Embedded in Debt Instruments and Related Issues,” which
addresses whether a modification to a conversion option that
changes its fair value affects the recognition of interest
expense for the associated debt instrument after the
modification and whether a borrower should recognize a
beneficial conversion feature, not a debt extinguishment if a
debt modification increases the intrinsic value of the debt (for
example, the modification reduces the conversion price of the
debt). This issue is effective for future modifications of debt
instruments beginning in the first interim or annual reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does
not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a
significant effect on its financial statements.
In September 2005, the FASB also ratified EITF Issue
No. 05-8,
“Income Tax Consequences of Issuing Convertible Debt with a
Beneficial Conversion Feature,” which discusses whether the
issuance of convertible debt with a beneficial conversion
feature results in a basis difference arising from the intrinsic
value of the beneficial conversion feature on the commitment
date (which is treated and recorded in stockholder’s equity
for book purposes, but as a liability for income tax purposes)
and, if so, whether that basis difference is a temporary
difference under FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes.” This Issue should be applied by
retrospective application pursuant to Statement 154 to all
instruments with a beneficial conversion feature accounted for
under
Issue 00-27
included in financial statements for reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that
the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant
effect on its financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155
“Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140”
(“SFAS 155”). SFAS 155 addresses the
following: a) permits fair value re-measurement for any
hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative
that otherwise would require bifurcation; b) clarifies
which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not
subject to the requirements of Statement 133;
c) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in
securitized
F-19
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding
derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that
contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;
d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form
of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and
e) amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition
on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest
other than another derivative financial instrument.
SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first
fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The
Company is currently evaluating the requirements of
SFAS 155, but does not expect that the adoption of this
pronouncement will have a material effect on its financial
statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156 “Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets — an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 156”).
SFAS 156 is effective for the first fiscal year beginning
after September 15, 2006. SFAS 156 changes the way
entities account for servicing assets and obligations associated
with financial assets acquired or disposed of. The Company has
not yet completed its evaluation of the impact of adopting
SFAS 156 on its results of operations or financial
position, but does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 156
will have a material impact.
The FASB issued FASB Interpretation No.
(“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes,” on July 13, 2006. The new rules will be
effective for the Company in fiscal 2008. At this time, we have
not completed our review and assessment of the impact of the
adoption of FIN 48.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by
the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require
adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
NOTE 4 —
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
1,166
|
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
Less: allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5 —
Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Less: inventory allowances
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
(996
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
868
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 6 —
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
Value added tax receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7 —
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Manufacturing and other equipment
|
|
$
|
1,834
|
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
|
$
|
2,140
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Capital projects in progress
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,959
|
|
|
$
|
1,940
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets include $217,000 and $186,000 of equipment
purchases that were financed under capital lease obligations as
of March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively (Note 10).
The Company made approximately $40,000 and $37,000 of such
purchases during the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005,
respectively. The accumulated amortization on these assets
amounted to $80,000, $108,000 and $116,000 as of March 31,
2005 and 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively.
Depreciation expense (including amortization of leased assets)
amounted to $163,000, $434,000 and $651,000 for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and $138,000
and $161,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
2006, respectively.
F-21
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8 —
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Accrued salaries
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
Estimated liability for pending
litigation
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Investor deposits
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued stock option rescission
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued value added tax payable
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,335
|
|
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 —
Long-Term Debt
From May 1, 1999 through January 7, 2003, the Company
issued various notes for aggregate principal amounting to
$385,000 with interest rates ranging from 8% to 10.3% per
annum. The proceeds of these notes were used to fund the
Company’s operations. The Company made the remaining
principal payments on these notes which amounted to $84,000 and
$185,000 during the years ending March 31, 2004 and 2005,
respectively. Aggregate interest expense under these obligations
amounted to $19,000 and $9,000 for the years ended
March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
On May 1, 1999, the Company issued a note payable in the
amount of $64,000 with interest at 8% per annum and a final
payment due on December 31, 2009. The remaining balance on
this obligation, which amounts to $68,000 including accrued
interest, is included in non-current portion of long-term debt
in the accompanying balance sheet at March 31, 2006.
Contractual interest expense under this note amounted to $7,000
for each of the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005.
On February 7, 2003, the Company issued a $40,000
convertible note to a director of the Company bearing interest
at the rate of 10% per annum. The note was convertible, at the
option of the holder, into such number shares of the
Company’s common stock or Series A preferred stock
determined by dividing the amount to be converted by the
conversion price of $1.00 per share.
On February 26, 2003, the Company issued a $40,000
convertible note to a director of the Company bearing interest
at the rate of 10% per annum with a maturity date of
August 26, 2004. The note was convertible, at the option of
the holder, into such number shares of the Company’s common
stock or Series A preferred stock determined by dividing
the amount to be converted by the conversion price of
$1.00 per share.
The proceeds of these notes were used to finance operating
activities. The fair value of the underlying stock, measured at
the commitment date of each of these financing transactions, was
$2.00 per share. Accordingly, the Company recorded a
$40,000 discount against the principal values of the each of
these notes and a corresponding increase in stockholders’
equity for the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion
feature in accordance with EITF 98-5. The principal balance
of the note originated on February 2, 2003 was repaid in
F-22
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
October 2004. The principal balance of the note originated on
February 23, 2003 was converted into 40,000 shares of
convertible series A preferred stock in June 2005.
Aggregate contractual interest expense under the convertible
notes amounted to $3,000, $8,000 and $4,000 for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
On April 30, 2003, the Company completed a $500,000
financing transaction through the issuance of a note bearing
variable interest at the rate of 18% to 22% per annum and
warrants to purchase up to 82,500 shares of the
Company’s common stock (Note 12). In accordance with
APB Opinion No. 14 “Accounting for Convertible Debt
Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants,” the Company allocated
$538,000 of the proceeds to the note and $117,000 of proceeds to
the warrants. The difference between the carrying amount of the
note and its contractual redemption amount was accreted as
interest expense through July 31, 2005, its earliest date
of redemption. Accretion of the aforementioned discount amounted
to $36,500, $60,100 and $20,400 for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively and is
included as a component of interest expense in the accompanying
statements of operations. The proceeds from this note were used
to fund operating activities. Contractual interest expense under
this obligation amounted to $72,500, $99,700 and $30,100 for the
years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Principal payments on this note amounted to $100,000 and
$400,000 during the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, including the final payment made in July 2005.
From November 2003 to March 2006, the Company issued various
notes for aggregate principal amounting to $443,000 with
interest rates ranging from 6.65% to 8.2% per annum. The
proceeds of these notes were used to fund certain operating
activities. The Company made principal payments on these notes
which amounted to $21,300, $91,500 and $191,200 during the years
ending March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and
$45,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Interest
expense under these note obligations amounted to $900, $2,000
and $4,800 for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and
2006, respectively, and $3,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006. The aggregate remaining principal balance of
these notes, which amounts to $139,000, is included in the
current portion of long-term debt in the accompanying balance
sheet at March 31, 2006.
In March 2004, the Company entered into an equipment financing
facility providing it with up to $1,000,000 of available credit
to finance equipment purchases through March 31, 2005.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company drew an
aggregate of $994,000 of advances under this facility, which are
payable in 33 monthly installments with interest at the
rate of 13.5% per annum and mature at various times through
May 1, 2007. The Company also paid approximately $82,000 of
fees to the lender under this arrangement including $5,000 in
cash and $77,000 representing the fair value of warrants to
purchase up to 66,667 shares of the Company’s
Series A preferred stock (Note 12). The company
recorded the fair value of warrants and other fees as interest
expense during the year ended March 31, 2005, the one year
period in which the Company was permitted to draw advances under
this facility. All borrowings under this arrangement are
collateralized by the equipment financed under this facility.
The Company made principal payments on these notes which
amounted to $288,000 and $337,000 during the years ending
March 31, 2005 and 2006 respecitvely, and $92,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006. Interest expense under
this obligation amounted to $83,000 and $73,000 for the years
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and $41,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The remaining
principal balance on this long-term debt amounted to $350,000 at
March 31, 2006, including $332,000 included in the current
portion of notes payable obligations in the accompanying balance
sheet.
From January 2004 to March 2006, the Company issued various
notes for aggregate principal amounting to $182,000 with
interest rates ranging from 6.25% to 14.44% percent per annum.
The proceeds of these notes were used to purchase automobiles
and software. The Company made principal payments on these notes
of
F-23
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
$1,000, and $24,000 during the years ending March 31, 2005
and 2006, respectively, and $8,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006. Aggregate interest expense under these
obligations amounted to $1,000 and $8,900 for the years ended
March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and $3,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006. These notes are payable
in aggregate monthly installments of $3,000 through
March 14, 2011. The remaining balance of these notes
amounted to $156,000 at March 31, 2006, including $33,000
in the current portion of long-term debt in the accompanying
balance sheet.
In June 2006, the Company entered into a credit facility
providing it with up to $5,000,000 of available credit. The
facility permitted the Company to borrow up to a maximum of
$2,750,000 for growth capital, $1,250,000 for working capital
based on eligible accounts receivable and $1,000,000 in
equipment financing. During the three months ended June 30,
2006, the Company drew an aggregate of $4,182,000 of borrowings
under this facility. These borrowings are payable in 30 to
33 fixed monthly installments with interest at rates
ranging from 12.4% to 12.7% per annum, maturing at various
times through April 9, 2009. The Company has no unused
availability under this credit facility since amounts drawn
under the working capital facility were based upon an initial
measurement of eligible accounts receivable.
The Company also issued to the lender warrants to purchase up to
286,137 shares of its Series B preferred stock upon
originating the loan. In addition, the Company will issue
warrants to purchase up to 13,863 additional shares of its
Series B preferred stock in connection with its utilization
of the line of credit. The aggregate fair value of all warrants
issued to the lender under this arrangement amounts to
$1,047,000 (Note 12). This amount was recorded as debt
issue costs in the June 30, 2006 balance sheet and is being
amortized as interest expense over the term of the credit
facility.
Borrowings under the growth capital line are collateralized by
the total assets of the Company other than the Company’s
intellectual property, and the security interest extends to the
intellectual property under certain circumstances. Borrowings
under the equipment line are collateralized by the underlying
assets funded, and borrowings under the working capital line are
collateralized by eligible accounts receivable. On a monthly
basis, the Company must maintain a 1:1 ratio of borrowing under
the working capital line to eligible accounts receivable. The
Company has 30 days from each measurement date to either
increase eligible accounts receivable or pay the excess
principal in the event that the ratio is less than 1:1. No
restrictive covenants exist for either the equipment line or the
growth capital line. The Company made $49,000 of principal
payments on these notes during the three months ended
June 30, 2006. The Company is not required to direct
customer remittances to a lock box, nor does the credit
agreement provide for subjective acceleration of the loans. The
aggregate remaining principal balance under this facility
amounted to $4,133,000, including $1,161,000 in the current
portion of long term debt in the accompanying balance sheet at
June 30, 2006.
In June 2006, the Company entered into a note agreement for
$69,000 with interest rate of 7.94% percent per annum. The
proceeds of this note were used to purchase an automobile. This
note is payable in monthly installments of $1,200 through May
2012. The remaining balance of this note amounted to $68,000 at
June 30, 2006, including $9,000 in the current portion of
long-term debt in the accompanying balance sheet.
F-24
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
A summary of principal payments due in years subsequent to
March 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For years ending
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
2008
|
|
|
54
|
|
2009
|
|
|
39
|
|
2010
|
|
|
106
|
|
2011
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
|
714
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10 —
Capital Lease Obligations
From September 1, 2001, through July 1, 2002, the
Company entered into various capital leases under which the
aggregate present value of the minimum lease payments amounted
to $123,000. In accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting
for Leases” (“SFAS 13”), the present value
of the minimum lease payments was calculated using discount
rates ranging from 10% to 17%. Lease payments, including amounts
representing interest, amounted to $38,000, $36,000 and $15,000,
for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively. These capital leases were paid in full by March
2006.
From September 1, 2003, through October 1, 2003, the
Company entered into various capital leases under which the
aggregate present value of the minimum lease payments amounted
to $40,000. The present value of the minimum lease payments was
calculated using discount rates of ranging from 13% to 18%.
Lease payments, including amounts representing interest,
amounted to $3,000, $11,000 and $11,000 for the years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, and $3,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2006. The remaining
principal balance on these obligations amounted to $27,000 at
March 31, 2006, including $7,700 included in the current
portion of capital lease obligations in the accompanying balance
sheet.
On November 10, 2004, the Company entered into a capital
lease under which the present value of the minimum lease
payments amounted to $37,000. The present value of the minimum
lease payments was calculated using a discount rate of 10%.
Lease payments, including amounts representing interest,
amounted to $3,900 and $8,500 for the years ended March 31,
2005 and 2006, respectively, and $1,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006. The remaining principal balance on
these obligations amounted to $29,000 at March 31, 2006,
including $7,000 included in the current portion of capital
lease obligations in the accompanying balance sheet.
The Company recorded interest expense in connection with these
lease agreements in the amounts of $9,600, $11,000 and $8,900
for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, and $2,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006.
F-25
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Minimum lease payments due in years subsequent to March 31,
2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For years ending
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
2008
|
|
|
21
|
|
2009
|
|
|
21
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
69
|
|
Less: amounts representing interest
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease
payments
|
|
|
56
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11 —
Commitments, Contingencies and Other Matters
Lease
Commitments
The Company has entered into various non-cancelable operating
leases, primarily for office facility space, that expire at
various time through April 2011. Minimum lease payments for
non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For years ending
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
2008
|
|
|
177
|
|
2009
|
|
|
163
|
|
2010
|
|
|
92
|
|
2011
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense amounted to $273,000, $510,000 and $535,000 for the
years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Rent expense amounted to $143,000 and $135,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Employment
Agreements
During years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company
entered into employment agreements with five of its key
executives. The agreements provide, among other things, for the
payment of aggregate annual salaries of approximately $880,000
and up to twenty four months of severance compensation for
terminations under certain circumstances. Aggregate potential
severance compensation amounted to $1,284,000 at March 31,
2006.
In October 2005, the Board of Directors also authorized the
Company to grant 240,000 stock options at an exercise price of
$0.75 per share to its Chief Financial Officer upon the
successful completion of its proposed IPO (if completed). These
options, if awarded, would be fully vested and non-forfeitable
at the date of grant.
F-26
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Legal
Matters
The Company has been named as a defendant in an employment
related matter under a complaint filed by one of its former
employees in the Superior Court of the State of California in
the County of Sonoma in April 2005. Although the Company
believes that the employee’s claim is without merit and
intends to defend its position with respect to this matter, a
$300,000 reserve was established based on the Company’s
estimate of potential loss. Although the Company believes that
its estimate is reasonable with respect to this matter, there
can be no assurance that the Company will successfully defend
itself against this litigation. The reserve is a component of
accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the
accompanying balance sheets.
In November 2005, the Company identified a possible criminal
misappropriation of its technology in Mexico, and it notified
the Mexican Attorney General’s office. The Company believes
the Mexican Attorney General is currently conducting an
investigation.
On March 14, 2006, the Company filed suit in the Northern
District of California Federal Court against Nofil Corporation
and Naoshi Kono, Chief Executive Officer of Nofil, for breach of
contract, misappropriation of trade secrets and trademark
infringement. The Company believes that Nofil Corporation
violated key terms of both an exclusive purchase agreement and
non-disclosure agreement by contacting and working with a
potential competitor in Mexico. In the complaint, the Company
seeks damages of $3,500,000 and immediate injunctive relief. No
trial date has been set.
The Company is currently a party in two trademark matters
asserting confusion in trademarks with respect to the
Company’s use of the name Microcyn60 in Mexico. Although
the Company believes that the nature and intended use of its
products are different from those with the similar names, it has
agreed with one of the parties to stop using the name Microcyn60
by September 2007. Although such plaintiff referred the
matter to the Mexico Trademark Office, the Company is not aware
of a claim for monetary damages. Company management believes
that the name change will satisfy an assertion of confusion;
however, Company management believes that the Company could
incur a possible loss of approximately $100,000 for the use of
the name Microcyn60 during the twelve month period following the
date of settlement.
In June 2006, the Company received a written communication
from the grantor of a license to an earlier version of its
technology indicating that such license was terminated due to an
alleged breach of the license agreement by the Company. The
license agreement extends to the Company’s use of the
technology in Japan only. While the Company does not believe
that the grantor’s revocation is valid under the terms of
the license agreement and no legal claim has been threatened to
date, the Company cannot provide any assurance that the grantor
will not take legal action to restrict the Company’s use of
the technology in the licensed territory.
While the Company management does not anticipate that the
outcome of this matter is likely to result in a material loss,
there can be no assurance that if the grantor pursues legal
action, such legal action would not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
The Company, from time to time, is involved in legal matters
arising in the ordinary course of its business. While management
believes that such matters are currently insignificant, there
can be no assurance that matters arising in the ordinary course
of business for which the Company is or could become involved in
litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on its
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Consulting
Agreement
On October 1, 2005 the Company entered into a consulting
agreement with White Moon Medical. Akihisa Akao, a member of the
Board of Directors, is the sole stockholder of White Moon. Under
the terms of the agreement, the individual will be compensated
for services provided outside his normal Board duties. Total
compensation to be paid amounts to $146,000, payable in monthly
installments over the one year term of
F-27
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
the agreement. In accordance with the terms of this agreement,
the Company made payments in the amount of $110,000 for the
period of October 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006.
Proposed
Initial Public Offering
On September 1, 2005 the Board of Directors authorized the
Company to file a registration statement with the SEC in
connection with its proposed IPO. The Company incurred $478,000
of costs during the year ended March 31, 2006 and $557,000
of costs in the three months ended June 30, 2006 in
connection with its proposed IPO, which amounts are presented as
deferred offering costs in the accompanying balance sheet at
March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006. If the Company
completes its IPO, these costs will be recorded as a reduction
of the proceeds received. If the Company does not successfully
complete its IPO, the costs will be recorded as a charge to
operations.
NOTE 12 —
Stockholders’ Equity
Authorized
Capital
The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares
of common stock and 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock of
which 5,500,000 shares have been designated as
Series A preferred stock, 11,222,222 shares have been
designated as Series B preferred stock and
3,500,000 shares have been designated Series C
preferred stock.
Description
of Common Stock
Each share of common stock has the right to one vote. The
holders of common stock are entitled to dividends when funds are
legally available and when declared by the Board of Directors,
subject to the prior right of the preferred Series A
stockholders to cumulative dividends that accrue beginning
January 1, 2006.
Convertible
Preferred Stock
During the year ended March 31, 2004, the Company issued in
a private placement transaction, 5,351,244 shares of its
Series A convertible preferred stock for net proceeds of
$6,628,000 (gross proceeds of $8,027,000 less offering costs of
$1,399,000).
In addition to the above, the Company issued in a private
placement transaction, an aggregate of 10,543,474 shares of
its Series B for net proceeds of $43,722,000 (gross
proceeds of $47,446,000 less offering costs of $3,724,000)
including 4,056,568 shares issued during the year ended
March 31, 2005 for net proceeds of $16,696,000 and
6,486,906 shares issued during the year ended
March 31, 2006 for net proceeds of $27,026,000.
The Series A is convertible into common stock at any time,
at the option of the holder at a conversion price of 1.50 per
share. The Series B is convertible into common stock at any
time, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of
$4.50 per share. In accordance with SFAS 133 and
EITF 00-19,
the Company evaluated the conversion options embedded in these
securities to determine whether they should be bifurcated from
their host instruments and accounted for as separate derivative
financial instruments. The Company determined, in accordance
with SFAS 133, that the risks and rewards of the common
shares underlying the conversion feature are clearly and closely
related to those of the host instrument. Accordingly the
conversion features, which are not deemed to be beneficial at
the commitment dates of these financing transactions, are being
accounted for as embedded conversion options in accordance with
EITF 98-5 and
EITF 00-27.
The number of shares issuable under the conversion features of
the Series A and Series B is subject to adjustment for
stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, dilutive
issuances and other anti-dilution
F-28
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
provisions. The Series A and Series B are also
automatically convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock, at the then applicable conversion price,
(i) in the event that the holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of Series A and Series B consent to
such conversion; or (ii) upon the closing of a firm
commitment underwritten public offering of shares of common
stock of the Company yielding aggregate proceeds of not less
than $20 million (before deduction of underwriters
commissions and expenses); or (iii) Company’s going
public by means of a merger or acquisition which has a resultant
market capitalization of greater than $75 million.
The Company has reserved 16,722,222 shares of its common
stock for issuance upon the conversion of its convertible
preferred stock.
Each share of Series A and Series B has voting rights
equal to an equivalent number of common shares into which it is
convertible and votes together as one class with common stock.
The holders of the Series A are entitled to receive
cumulative dividends in preference to any dividend on the common
stock at the rate of 6% per annum on the initial investment
amount commencing January 1, 2006. Dividends accrued but
unpaid with respect to this feature amounted to $121,000 for
both the year ended March 31, 2006 and the three months
ended June 30, 2006, and is presented as an increase in net
loss available to the common stockholders for the year ended
March 31, 2006. The Company has the option of paying the
dividend in either common stock or cash. The holders of
Series B are entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends
when and if declared by the Board. The holders of Series A
and Series B are also entitled to participate pro rata in
any dividends paid on the common stock, if declared by the board
of directors on an as converted basis.
In the event of any liquidation or winding up of the Company,
the holders of the Series A shall be entitled to
participate in the ratable distribution of the assets of the
Company until the holders of the Series A have received a
per share amount equal to two times the original purchase price,
as applicable, plus any declared but unpaid dividends. The
holders of Series B are entitled to participate in the
ratable distribution of the assets of the Company after the
holders of Series A have received a per share amount equal
to $3.00 and holders of Series B have received a per share
amount equal to 125% of their original purchase price of the
Series B, in both cases plus any declared but unpaid
dividends. Thereafter, any remaining assets would be distributed
ratably to the holders of common stock until the common
stockholders have received a per share amount equal to $3.00.
Any remaining assets of the Company thereafter would be
distributed ratably to Series A preferred and Series B
preferred stockholders and to the common stockholders, on an as
converted basis.
Liquidation events include (i) a final dissolution or
winding up of the Company’s affairs requiring a liquidation
of all classes of stock, (ii) a merger, consolidation or
similar event resulting in a more than 50% change in control,
(iii) the sale of all or substantially all of the
Company’s assets and (iv) the effectuation (at the
Company’s election) of any transaction or series of
transactions resulting in a more than 50% change in control. The
Company is required, under California law, to obtain the
approval of a majority of its stockholders with respect to
effectuating either a merger, consolidation or similar
transaction or any transaction resulting in the sale of all or
substantially all of its assets. The Company’s preferred
stockholders currently represent less than a 50% voting
majority. Accordingly, the Company classified its Series A
and Series B preferred shares in stockholders’ equity
in the accompanying balance sheet because the liquidation events
are deemed to be within the Company’s control in accordance
with the provisions of EITF
Topic D-98
“Classification and Measurement of Redeemable
Securities.”
Under the terms of Series A and B registration rights
agreements between the Company and its preferred stockholders,
any time after six months following the Company’s IPO (if
completed), the Series A and Series B investors may
request that the Company file a registration statement covering
the public sale of the underlying common stock under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“1933 Act”) with limited rights to delay by
F-29
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
the Company. The investors are also entitled to unlimited
piggyback registration rights on all 1933 Act registrations
of the Company (except for registrations relating to employee
benefit plans on
Form S-8
and corporate reorganizations on
Form S-4).
The foregoing demand and piggyback registration rights terminate
on the earlier of (i) one year after the Company’s IPO
or (ii) such time as Rule 144 or another similar
exemption under the 1933 Act is available for sale of all
of an Investor’s shares during a three-month period without
registration. The Investors Rights agreement also places certain
restrictions on the preferred stockholders from selling their
shares and provides them with certain rights of first refusal,
co-sale and drag along and tag along rights for sales
effectuated under certain circumstances.
Stock
Purchase Warrants Issued in Financing Transactions
During the year ended March 31, 2004, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock in
connection with bridge financing at an exercise price equal to
the lesser of $2.00 per share or the price offered to any
other investor in subsequent stock offerings prior to the
expiration date of the warrants. The warrants were valued using
the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assumptions used were as
follows: Fair value of the underlying stock $2.00; risk-free
interest rate 3.03%; contractual life of 5 years; dividend
yield of 0%; and volatility of 70%. The fair value of these
warrants, which amounted to $88,478, was recorded as interest
expense in the accompanying statement of operations for the year
ended March 31, 2004.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock in
connection with bridge financing at an exercise price equal to
the lesser of $1.50 per share or the price offered to any
other investor in subsequent stock offerings prior to the
expiration date of the warrants. The warrants were valued using
the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assumptions used were as
follows: Fair value of the underlying stock $1.41; risk-free
interest rate 2.94%; contractual life of 4 years; dividend
yield of 0%; and volatility of 70%. The fair value of the
warrants amounted to $28,309 and was recorded as interest
expense in the accompanying statement of operations for the year
ended March 31, 2005.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase 66,667 shares of Series A
preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share in
connection with an equipment leasing arrangement. The warrants
were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assumptions
used were as follows: Fair value of the underlying stock $1.44;
risk-free interest rate 5.55% percent; contractual life of
10 years; dividend yield of 0%; and volatility of 70%. The
fair value of the warrants, which amounted to $77,000, was
recorded as interest expense in the accompanying statement of
operations for the year ended March 31, 2005.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase 1,735,123 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $1.50 per share to the placement agent
that managed the Series A offering. The warrants were fully
exercisable at the date of issuance with no future performance
obligations by the placement agent and expire the second year
following an IPO by the Company.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase 1,317,933 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $4.50 per share to the placement agent
that managed the Series B stock offering. The warrants were
fully exercisable at the date of issuance with no future
performance obligations by the placement agent and expire the
second year following an IPO by the Company.
During the three month period ended June 30, 2006, the
Company issued warrants to purchase 286,137 shares of
Series B preferred stock at an exercise price of
$4.50 per share in connection with the new financing
facility described in Note 9. The warrants were valued
using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assumptions used were as
follows: Fair value of the underlying stock $4.50; risk-free
interest rate 5.15% percent; contractual life of 11 years;
dividend yield of 0%; and volatility of 70%. The fair value of
the warrants, which amounted to $1,047,000, was recorded as
deferred debt issue costs in the June 30, 2006
F-30
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
balance sheet and is being amortized as interest expense over
the term of the credit facility. Amortization of the these costs
amounted to $17,000 and is included as a component of interest
expense in the accompanying statement of operations for the
three months ended June 30, 2006.
Common
Stock and Common Stock Purchase Warrants Issued to Non-Employees
for Services
During the year ended March 31, 2004, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 38,662 shares of common stock to
various consultants at exercise prices ranging from $0.75 to
$2.00 per share. The warrants were fully exercisable at
date of issuance and expire on dates ranging from May 31,
2013 to February 14, 2014. The warrants were valued using
the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assumptions used were as
follows: Fair value of the underlying stock of $1.31 to $2.00;
risk-free interest rate 3.69% to 4.35%; contractual life of
10 years; dividend yield of 0%; and a volatility of 70%.
The fair value of the warrants amounted to $44,000 and was
recorded as selling, general and administrative expense in the
accompanying statement of operations for the year ended
March 31, 2004.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued
50,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in exchange
for services provided. The fair value of the underlying stock
was valued at $2.54 per share. The shares were fully earned
when issued with no future performance obligation by the
consultant. The aggregate fair value of the shares amounted to
$127,000 and was recorded as a selling, general and
administrative expense in the accompanying statement of
operations for the year ended March 31, 2006.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 255,374 shares of common stock to
various consultants at an exercise price of $4.50 per
share. Fair value of the underlying stock at the date of grant
was $2.54 per share. The warrants become exercisable at
various dates through November 11, 2009 and expire at
various dates through August 31, 2015. The fair value of
the warrants, which amounted to $153,000, was recorded as a
selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying
statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2006.
The Company accounted for its issuance of stock based
compensation to non-employees for services using the
measurements date guidelines enumerated in SFAS 123 and
EITF 96-18. Accordingly, the value of any awards that were
vested and non forfeitable at their date of issuance were
measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments at
the date of issuance. The non-vested portion of awards that are
subject to the future performance of the counterparty are
adjusted at each reporting date to their fair values based upon
the then current market value of the company’s stock and
other assumptions that management believes are reasonable.
During the three month period ended June 30, 2006, the
Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock to a
consultant in exchange for services provided. The fair value of
the underlying stock was valued at $2.82 per share. The
shares were fully vested and were non-forfeitable when issued
with no future performance obligation by the consultant. The
aggregate fair value of the shares, which amounted to $43,000,
was recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense in
the accompanying statement of operations for the three months
ended June 30, 2006.
Valuation
of Common Stock
For the year ended March 31, 2004, all stock options that
the Company granted to employees and non-employees under its
1999, 2000 and 2003 Stock Option Plans were recorded at their
cash settlement value due to a compliance matter for which the
statute of limitations has expired. In July 2005, the Company
engaged an outside valuation specialist to determine the fair
value of its common stock. The fair value of the Company’s
common stock, based on this valuation study, was determined to
be $2.54 per share. Accordingly, the fair value of the
Company’s common stock underlying all equity transactions
completed during the years ended
F-31
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 (other than options granted
under the 1999, 2000 and 2003 stock option plans) was based on
the results of the valuation study. The results were adjusted to
the date of grant based on an analysis performed by management.
The results were assessed for reasonableness by comparing such
amounts to concurrent sales of other equity instruments to
unrelated parties for cash and intervening events reflected in
the price of the Company’s stock.
In June 2006, the Company engaged an outside valuation
specialist to determine the fair value of its common stock. The
fair value of the Company’s common stock, based on this
valuation study, was determined to be $2.82 per share.
Accordingly, the fair value of the Company’s common stock
underlying all equity transactions completed during the three
months ended June 30, 2006 was based on the results of the
valuation study.
NOTE 13 —
Stock Compensation Plans
1999,
2000 and 2003 Stock Plans
The 1999, 2000 and 2003 Stock Option Plans became effective May
1999, June 2000 and July 2003, respectively. The Plans provide
for grants of both incentive stock options (ISO’s) and
non-qualified stock options (NSO’s) to employees,
consultants and directors. A total of 4,605,000, 1,395,000 and
4,000,000 common shares were reserved for issuance under the
1999, 2000 and 2003 Plans, respectively.
In accordance with the Plans, stated exercise price shall not be
less than 100% and 85% of the estimated fair market value of the
Company’s common stock on the date of grant for ISO’s
and NSO’s, respectively, as determined by the board of
directors at the date of grant. With respect to any 10%
shareholder, the exercise price of an ISO or NSO was not to
exceed 110% of the estimated fair market value per share on the
date of grant.
Options issued under the Plan have a ten-year term and generally
became exercisable over a five-year period.
As of March 31, 2006, the Company’s compensation
committee of the board of directors determined that it would not
approve any further grants under its 1999, 2000, and 2003 Plans.
At March 31, 2006 there were 5,745,267 options available
for issue in the 1999, 2000, and 2003 Plans that will not be
issued.
On June 29, 2006, the compensation committee of the
Company’s board of directors adopted a resolution
authorizing the Company to cancel these plans. Accordingly,
5,745,267 options previously available for issue are no longer
available for future grants.
2004
Stock Plan
The 2004 Stock Option Plan (“the 2004 Plan”) became
effective July 2004. The 2004 Plan provides for the issuance of
both ISO’s and NSO’s. Nonqualified and incentive stock
options may be granted to employees, consultants and directors.
A total of 6,000,000 common shares were reserved for issuance
under the 2004 Plan at March 31, 2005. As of March 31,
2006, 2,201,643 shares are available for future grant under
the Plan.
In accordance with the Plan, the stated exercise price shall not
be less than 100% and 85% of the estimated fair market value of
common stock on the date of grant for ISO’s and NSO’s,
respectively, as determined by the board of directors at the
date of grant. With respect to any 10% shareholder, the exercise
price of an ISO or NSO shall not be less than 110% of the
estimated fair market value per share on the date of grant.
Options issued under the Plan have a ten-year term and generally
become exercisable over a five-year period.
F-32
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Options
Granted Outside of Plans
In May 2004, the Company granted an option to purchase
1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an
exercise price of $0.04 per share to the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company. The fair value of the underlying common
stock at the date of grant was $1.49 per share. The options
were fully exercisable on the date of grant. Stock compensation
expense related to these options amounted to $1,740,000 and was
recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the
year ended March 31, 2005.
A summary of option activity as of June 30, 2006
(unaudited), and changes during the the three month period ended
June 30, 2006 is presented below (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
|
Options
|
|
($000)
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
Value ($000)
|
|
Outstanding at April 1, 2006
|
|
|
7,876
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
$
|
13,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
$
|
10,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference
between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and
the fair value of the Company’s common stock
($2.82 per share) for stock options that are
in-the-money
as of June 30, 2006.
At June 30, 2006, there was $650,000 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to options that the Company accounted
for under APB 25 through March 31, 2006. These costs
are expected to be recognized over a weighted average
1.75 years.
The weighted-average estimated minimum values of options granted
were $0.24, $1.25 and $0.78 for the years ended March 31,
2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively and $1.78 for the three months
ended June 30, 2005.
In the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did
not grant any share based arrangements to employees or
non-employees. In addition, the Company did not modify any stock
options granted to employees or non-employees under share based
arrangements or capitalize the cost associated with stock based
compensation.
The Company issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of
stock options.
F-33
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Non-Employee
Options
The Company believes that the fair value of the stock options
issued to non-employees is more reliably measurable than the
fair value of the services received. The fair value of the stock
options granted was calculated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model as prescribed by SFAS No. 123
using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
8.25 yrs
|
|
9.06 yrs
|
|
8.67 yrs
|
|
8.99 yrs
|
|
8.61 yrs
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
3.88%
|
|
4.50%
|
|
4.27%
|
|
4.01%
|
|
5.13%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
Volatility
|
|
70%
|
|
70%
|
|
70%
|
|
70%
|
|
70%
|
The stock-based compensation expense will fluctuate as the fair
market value of the common stock fluctuates. In connection with
stock options granted to non-employees, the Company recorded
$7,000, $30,000, $32,000 of stock-based compensation expense in
the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, and $30,000 and $3,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
NOTE 14 —
Taxes
The Company has the following net deferred tax assets (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
8,870
|
|
|
$
|
17,290
|
|
Tax credits carryforwards
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Reserves and accruals
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,284
|
|
|
|
18,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis difference in assets
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
State taxes
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
9,676
|
|
|
|
17,783
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,676
|
)
|
|
|
(17,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
The Company’s recorded income tax benefit, net of the
change in the valuation allowance, for each of the periods
presented is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
|
$
|
6,019
|
|
|
$
|
8,107
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,479
|
)
|
|
|
(6,019
|
)
|
|
|
(8,107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the
Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected statutory rate
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
State income taxes, net of federal
benefit
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
Foreign earnings taxed at
different rates
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Effect of permanent differences
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
|
|
36.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2006, the Company had net operating loss
carryforwards for federal, state and foreign income tax purposes
of approximately $28,800,000, $25,900,000 and $17,400,000,
respectively. The carryforwards expire beginning 2020, 2010 and
2014, respectively. The Company also had, at March 31,
2006, federal and state research credit carryforwards of
approximately $104,000 and $108,000, respectively. The federal
credits expire beginning in 2026 and the state credits do not
expire.
The Company experienced substantial ownership changes in
connection with financing transactions it completed through the
year ended March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the Company’s
utilization of its net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards against taxable income in future periods, if any,
is subject to substantial limitations under the Change in
Ownership rules of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Company, after considering all available evidence,
fully reserved for these and its other deferred tax assets since
it is more likely than not such benefits will not be realized in
future periods. The Company has incurred losses for both
financial reporting and income tax purposes for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and anticipates it will incur such
losses for the year ended March 31, 2007. Accordingly, the
Company is continuing to fully reserve for its deferred tax
assets. The Company will continue to evaluate its deferred tax
assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could
affect the realization of their future benefit. If it is
determined in future periods that portions of the Company’s
deferred income tax assets satisfy the realization standard of
SFAS No. 109, the valuation allowance will be reduced
accordingly.
NOTE 15 —
Employee Benefit Plan
In 2002, the Company established a program to contribute and
administer individual retirement accounts for regular full time
employees. Under the plan the Company matches employee
contributions to the plan up to 3% of the employee’s
salary. The Company contributed $34,000, $63,000 and $53,000 to
the program for
F-35
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, and $12,000 and $15,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
NOTE 16 —
Segment and Geographic Information
In accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures
About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”
(“SFAS 131”), operating segments are identified
as components of an enterprise for which separate and discreet
financial information is available and is used by the chief
operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making
decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance.
The Company’s chief decision-makers, as defined by
SFAS 131, are the Chief Executive Officer and his direct
reports.
The Company’s chief decision-makers review financial
information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by
disaggregated information about revenue and operating profit by
operating unit. This information is used for purposes of
allocating resources and evaluating financial performance.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the “Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies.” Segment data includes segment revenue, segment
operating profitability, and total assets by segment. Shared
corporate operating expenses are reported in the
U.S. segment.
The Company is organized primarily on the basis of operating
units which are segregated by geography.
F-36
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
The following tables present information about reportable
segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year ended March 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(4,914
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|
|
(7,097
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
2,992
|
|
Year ended March 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(12,242
|
)
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(16,312
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
Year ended March 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
1,788
|
|
|
$
|
1,966
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(12,621
|
)
|
|
|
(2,685
|
)
|
|
|
(5,545
|
)
|
|
|
(20,851
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
12,689
|
|
Three months ended
June 30, 2005 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(2,412
|
)
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
(3,984
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
14,852
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
17,576
|
|
F-37
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Three months ended
June 30, 2006 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(2,598
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,586
|
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
|
|
2,263
|
|
|
|
13,378
|
|
NOTE 17 —
Discontinued Operations
On June 16, 2005, the Company entered into a series of
agreements with Quimica Pasteur, or QP, a Mexico-based company
engaged in the business of distributing pharmaceutical products
to hospitals and health care entities owned or operated by the
Mexican Ministry of Health. These agreements provided, among
other things, for QP to act as the Company’s exclusive
distributor of Microcyn to the Mexican Ministry of Health for a
period of three years. In connection with these agreements, an
individual designated by the Company who is also one of the
Company’s executive officers concurrently acquired, in his
individual capacity and for no additional consideration, a 0.25%
equity interest in QP. The Company was granted an option to
acquire the remaining 99.75% directly from its principals in
exchange for 600,000 shares of common stock, contingent
upon QP’s attainment of certain financial milestones. The
Company’s distribution and related agreements were
cancelable by the Company on thirty days’ notice
without cause and included certain provisions to hold the
Company harmless from debts incurred by QP outside the scope of
the distribution and related agreements. The Company terminated
these agreements on March 26, 2006.
Due to its liquidity circumstances, QP was unable to sustain
operations without the Company’s subordinated financial and
management support. Accordingly, QP was deemed to be a variable
interest entity in accordance with FIN 46(R) and its
results were consolidated with the Company’s financial
statements for the period of June 16, 2005 through
March 26, 2006, the effective termination date of the
distribution and related agreements.
In accordance with SFAS 144, the Company has reported
QP’s results for the period of June 16, 2005 through
March 26, 2006 as discontinued operations because the
operations and cash flows of QP have been eliminated from the
Company’s ongoing operations as a result of having
terminated these agreements. The Company no longer has any
continuing involvement with QP as of the date in which the
agreements were terminated. Amounts associated with the
Company’s loss upon the termination of its agreements with
QP, which consists of funds advanced by the Company for working
capital, are presented separately from QP’s operating
results.
Subsequent to having entered into the agreements with QP, the
Company became aware of an alleged tax avoidance scheme
involving the principals of QP. The audit committee of the
Company’s board of directors engaged an independent
counsel, as well as tax counsel in Mexico to investigate this
matter. The audit committee of the board of directors was
advised that QP’s principals could be liable for up to
$7,000,000 of unpaid taxes; however, the Company is unlikely to
have any loss exposure with respect to this matter because the
alleged tax omission occurred prior to the Company’s
involvement with QP. The Company has not received any
communications to date from Mexican tax authorities with respect
to this matter.
F-38
OCULUS
INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —
(Continued)
(INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2006 IS UNAUDITED)
Based on an opinion of Mexico counsel, the Company management
and the audit committee of the board of directors do not believe
that the Company is likely to experience any loss with respect
to this matter. However, there can be no assurance that the
Mexican tax authorities will not pursue this matter and, if
pursued, that it would not result in a material loss to the
Company.
NOTE 18 —
Subsequent Events
On July 27, 2006, the Company granted options to purchase
an aggregate of 680,500 shares of common stock with an
exercise price of $3.00 per share.
On August 31, 2006, the Company filed an amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation authorizing the Company to issued
3,500,000 shares of Series C preferred stock. On
September 14, 2006, the Company sold 338,156 units,
consisting of 338,156 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 67,631 shares of
the Company’s common stock at $4.50 per share, at a per
unit price of $4.50. Gross proceeds from this sale amounted to
$1,521,702 and proceeds net of commissions amounted to
$1,369,532. In addition, the Company issued to the placement
agent warrants to purchase 42,269 shares of the
Company’s common stock at $4.50 per share. These shares
were sold in connection with an agreement entered into between
the Company and a placement agent in May 2006.
In August 2006, the Company received a “show cause”
letter from the Environmental Protection Agency
(“EPA”), which stated that, in tests conducted by the
EPA, Cidalcyn was found to be ineffective in killing certain
specified pathogens when used according to label directions.
Based on its results, the EPA strongly recommended that the
Company immediately recall all Cidalcyn distributed on and after
September 28, 2005. Accordingly, the Company has commenced
a voluntary recall of Cidalcyn. Although the Company has not
marketed Cidalcyn on a large commercial scale, it has provided
it in small quantities to numerous hospitals solely for use in
product evaluation exercises. In a second letter, the EPA stated
it intended to file a civil administrative complaint against the
Company for violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”). Under FIFRA, the EPA could
assess civil penalties related to the sale and distribution of a
pesticide product not meeting the label’s claims as a
broad-spectrum hospital disinfectant. The Company believes that
such civil penalties could be up to $200,000. The Company
currently cannot estimate the actual amount of penalties which
may be incurred.
In September 2006, a consulting firm in Mexico City contacted
the Company threatening legal action in Mexico, alleging breach
of contract and claiming damages of $225,000. A formal
compliant has not been served and no trial date has been set.
The Company is currently in settlement negotiations with the
plaintiff. If these negotiations are not successful, the
Company intends to vigorously defend this action. If the claims
are litigated, the Company may incur considerable litigation
costs.
F-39
Shares
Oculus
Innovative Sciences, Inc.
Common
Stock
|
|
A.G.
Edwards
|
Jefferies &
Company
|
|
|
First
Albany Capital
|
C.E.
Unterberg, Towbin
|
The date of this
prospectus
is ,
2006
Until ,
2006, all dealers that effect transaction in these securities,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required
to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the
dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as
underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
Part II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
|
The following table sets forth the various expenses expected to
be incurred by the Registrant in connection with the sale and
distribution of the securities being registered hereby, other
than underwriting discounts and commissions. All amounts listed
are estimated except the Securities and Exchange Commission
registration fee, the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. filing fee and the Nasdaq National Market listing
fee.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
8,614
|
|
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. filing fee
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
Nasdaq National Market listing fee
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Blue Sky fees and expenses
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Registrar and Transfer
Agent’s fees
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* To be filed by amendment
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
|
In connection with the completion of this offering, the
Registrant intends to reincorporate into Delaware.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
provides for the indemnification of officers, directors, and
other corporate agents in terms sufficiently broad to indemnify
such persons under certain circumstances for liabilities
(including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). The
Registrant’s form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation
to be effective upon completion of this offering
(Exhibit 3.3 hereto) and the Registrant’s form of
Bylaws to be effective upon completion of this offering
(Exhibit 3.6 hereto) provide for indemnification of the
Registrant’s directors, officers, employees and other
agents to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law. The Registrant has also entered into agreements
with our directors and officers that will require the
Registrant, among other things, to indemnify them against
certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or
service as directors or officers to the fullest extent not
prohibited by law.
The Underwriting Agreement (Exhibit 1.1) will provide for
indemnification by the Underwriters of the Registrant, our
directors and officers, and by the Registrant, of the
Underwriters, for certain liabilities, including liabilities
arising under the Act, and affords certain rights of
contribution with respect thereto.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
The following information does not give effect to the
Registrant’s reverse common stock split to be effected
prior to the completion of this offering.
Exercises
of Stock Options
On various dates between January 14, 2002 and
August 31, 2006, the Registrant sold 1,364,916 shares
of its common stock to employees and directors pursuant to the
exercise of options granted under our 1999, 2000, 2003 and 2004
stock plans. The exercise prices per share ranged from $0.033 to
$0.75, for an aggregate consideration of $297,585.
II-1
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the
Securities Act, as transactions under compensatory benefit plans
and contracts relating to compensation as provided under
Rule 701. The sale of the above securities in a
12 months period did not exceed the greater of
(a) $1,000,000, (b) 15% of total assets as of the
Registrant’s most recent balance sheet or (c) 15% of
the number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common
stock sold in reliance of this Rule.
Issuances
of Capital Stock in Financing Rounds
On various dates between August 7, 2003 and
February 25, 2004, the Registrant sold
5,391,244 shares of series A convertible preferred
stock for aggregate consideration of $8,066,866 to 198
accredited investors. In connection with these sales the
Registrant paid to Brookstreet Securities Corporation, as
placement agent, an aggregate of $1,123,746 in commissions and
issued to Brookstreet and its affiliates warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 1,735,123 shares of the Registrant’s
common stock. The Registrant also issued a warrant to purchase
66,667 shares of its series A convertible preferred
stock and a promissory note that could be converted into
40,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock.
On June 30, 2005, this convertible note was converted into
40,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock.
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchasers of these securities were
accredited investors, represented their intention to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for
sale with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were
affixed to the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. All purchasers had adequate access, through their
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
On various dates between April 30, 2004 and
October 27, 2005, the Registrant sold
10,543,474 shares of series B convertible preferred
stock for aggregate consideration of $47,445,663 to 361
accredited investors. In connection with these sales the
Registrant paid to Brookstreet, as placement agent, an aggregate
of $3,413,818 in commissions and issued to Brookstreet and its
affiliates warrants to purchase an aggregate of
1,317,933 shares of the Registrant’s common stock.
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchasers of these securities were
accredited investors, represented their intention to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for
sale with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were
affixed to the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. All purchasers had adequate access, through their
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
On September 14, 2006, the Registrant sold 338,156 units,
consisting of 338,156 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 67,631 shares of
common stock at $4.50 per share, at a per unit price of
$4.50 for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,521,702. In connection
with this sale, the Registrant paid to Brookstreet Securities
Corporation, as placement agent, an aggregate of $152,170 in
commissions and issued to Brookstreet fully vested warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 42,269 shares of the
Registrant’s common stock.
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchasers of these securities were
qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited
investors, represented their intention to acquire the securities
for investment only and not with a view to or for sale with any
distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were affixed to
the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. All purchasers had adequate access, through their
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
II-2
Issuance
of Securities in Debt Financing
In June 2006, the Registrant entered into a Loan and Security
Agreement with a financial institution. In conjunction with this
agreement, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 300,000 shares of its series B preferred
stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per shares. The sale of
these securities was considered to be exempt from registration
under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 506 of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The
purchaser is an accredited investor, represented its intention
to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to or fore sale with any distribution thereof, and
appropriate legends were affixed to the instruments issued in
the transaction. The purchaser had access, through its
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1**
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.3**
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.4*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant’s subsidiary, OIS Reincorporation Sub, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation.
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Registrant, to be filed upon the completion
of the offering to which this Registration Statement relates.
|
|
3
|
.6**
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as
amended (composite copy).
|
|
3
|
.7*
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant’s
subsidiary, OIS Reincorporation Sub, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
Form of Bylaws of the Registrant,
to be effective upon the completion of the offering to which
this Registration Statement relates.
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
4
|
.2**
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series A
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between the Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc., dated
April 21, 2004.
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series B
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between the Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing IV, Inc., dated June 14,
2006.
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant.
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant.
|
|
4
|
.6**
|
|
Amended and Restated Investors
Rights Agreement, effective as of April 30, 2004.
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of Promissory Note issued to
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc.
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Equipment
and Soft Cost Loans) issued to Venture Lending &
Leasing IV, Inc.
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Growth
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc.
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Working
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc.
|
|
4
|
.11**
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between the Registrant and its officers and directors.
|
|
10
|
.2**
|
|
1999 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements
|
|
10
|
.3**
|
|
2000 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements.
|
|
10
|
.4**
|
|
2003 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements.
|
|
10
|
.5**
|
|
2004 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
and related form stock option plan agreement.
|
|
10
|
.7**
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
October 26, 1999, between the Registrant and RNM Lakeville,
L.P.
|
|
10
|
.8**
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 1, dated September 15, 2000, between Registrant
and RNM Lakeville L.P.
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.9**
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 2, dated July 29, 2005, between the Registrant and
RNM Lakeville L.P.
|
|
10
|
.10**
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
May 15, 2005, between Oculus Technologies of
Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Antonio Sergio Arturo Fernandez
Valenzuela (translated from Spanish).
|
|
10
|
.11**
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated July
2003, between Oculus Innovative Sciences Netherlands, B.V.
and Artikona Holding B.V. (translated from Dutch).
|
|
10
|
.12**
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
March 25, 2004, between the Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing III, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.13**
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
June 14, 2006, between the Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing IV, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.14**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Hojabr Alimi.
|
|
10
|
.15**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Jim Schutz.
|
|
10
|
.16**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Robert Miller.
|
|
10
|
.17**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2005, between the Registrant and Bruce Thornton.
|
|
10
|
.18**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
March 23, 2005, between the Registrant and Theresa Mitchell.
|
|
10
|
.19**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 10, 2006, between the Registrant and Mike Wokasch.
|
|
10
|
.20**
|
|
Form of Director Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.21**
|
|
Consultant Agreement, dated
October 1, 2005, by and between the Registrant and White
Moon Medical.
|
|
10
|
.22**
|
|
Leasing Agreement, dated
May 5, 2006, made by and between Mr. Jose Alfonzo I.
Orozco Perez and Oculus Technologies of Mexico, S.A.
de C.V.
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Lease
dated August 23, 2006, between the Registrant and RNM
Lakeville, L.P.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between the Registrant, Quimica Pasteur, S
de R.L., Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez and Jorge Paulino
Hermosillo Martin.
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Framework Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between Javier Orozco Gutierrez, Quimica
Pasteur, S de R.L., Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin, the
Registrant and Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Mercantile Consignment Agreement,
dated June 16, 2005, between Oculus Technologies de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. and Francisco Javier
Orozco Gutierrez.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Partnership Interest Purchase
Option Agreement, dated June 16, 2005, between the
Registrant and Javier Orozco Gutierrez.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin
(translated from Spanish).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez
(translated from Spanish).
|
|
16
|
.1
|
|
Letter regarding change in
certifying accountants.
|
|
21
|
.1**
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Marcum &
Kliegman LLP.
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Cheryl Bongiovanni,
Ph.D., RVT, CWS
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Tom A. Wolvos, M.D.,
F.A.C.S
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of David Armstrong, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of David E. Allie, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.7
|
|
Consent of Dr. Alfredo Barrera
|
|
23
|
.8
|
|
Consent of Valuation Research
Corporation
|
|
23
|
.9
|
|
Consent of Chevez, Ruiz, Zamarripa
y Cia, S.C.
|
|
23
|
.10
|
|
Consent of Luca Dalla-Paola, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.11
|
|
Consent of Andrew Boulton, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.12
|
|
Consent of Dr. Ariel Miranda
|
|
24
|
.1**
|
|
Power of Attorney (see
page II-5
of this Registration Statement).
|
II-4
|
|
|
*
|
|
To be filed by amendment.
|
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act, may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) For the purpose of determining liability of the registrant
under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial
distribution of the securities, in a primary offering of
securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this
registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method
used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities
are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the
following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a
seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell
such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(4) It will provide to the underwriters at the closing(s)
specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such
denominations and registered in such names as required by the
underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to this
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Petaluma,
State of California, on the
18
th
day of September, 2006.
Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc.
Hojabr Alimi
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed below by the following
persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/
Hojabr
Alimi
Hojabr
Alimi
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert
E. Miller
Robert
E. Miller
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Akihisa
Akao*
Akihisa
Akao
|
|
Director
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Edward
M. Brown*
Edward
M. Brown
|
|
Director
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Richard
Conley*
Richard
Conley
|
|
Director
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Gregory
M. French*
Gregory
M. French
|
|
Director
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
James
J. Schutz*
James
J. Schutz
|
|
Director
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
/s/
Hojabr
Alimi
Hojabr
Alimi
|
|
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
September 18, 2006
|
II-6
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1**
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.3**
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.4*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant’s subsidiary, OIS Reincorporation Sub, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation.
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Registrant, to be filed upon the completion
of the offering to which this Registration Statement relates.
|
|
3
|
.6**
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as
amended (composite copy).
|
|
3
|
.7*
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant’s
subsidiary, OIS Reincorporation Sub, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
Form of Bylaws of the Registrant,
to be effective upon the completion of the offering to which
this Registration Statement relates.
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
4
|
.2**
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series A
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between the Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc., dated
April 21, 2004.
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series B
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between the Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing IV, Inc., dated June 14,
2006.
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant.
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant.
|
|
4
|
.6**
|
|
Amended and Restated Investors
Rights Agreement, effective as of April 30, 2004.
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of Promissory Note issued to
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc.
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Equipment
and Soft Cost Loans) issued to Venture Lending &
Leasing IV, Inc.
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Growth
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc.
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Working
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc.
|
|
4
|
.11**
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between the Registrant and its officers and directors.
|
|
10
|
.2**
|
|
1999 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements
|
|
10
|
.3**
|
|
2000 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements.
|
|
10
|
.4**
|
|
2003 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements.
|
|
10
|
.5**
|
|
2004 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
and related form stock option plan agreement.
|
|
10
|
.7**
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
October 26, 1999, between the Registrant and RNM Lakeville,
L.P.
|
|
10
|
.8**
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 1, dated September 15, 2000, between the
Registrant and RNM Lakeville L.P.
|
|
10
|
.9**
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 2, dated July 29, 2005, between the Registrant and
RNM Lakeville L.P.
|
|
10
|
.10**
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
May 15, 2005, between Oculus Technologies of
Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Antonio Sergio Arturo
Fernandez Valenzuela (translated from Spanish).
|
|
10
|
.11**
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated July
2003, between Oculus Innovative Sciences, B.V. and Artikona
Holding B.V. (translated from Dutch).
|
|
10
|
.12**
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
March 25, 2004, between Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing III, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.13**
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
June 14, 2006, between Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing IV, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.14**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Hojabr Alimi.
|
|
10
|
.15**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Jim Schutz.
|
|
10
|
.16**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Robert Miller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.17**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2005, between the Registrant and Bruce Thornton.
|
|
10
|
.18**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
March 23, 2005, between the Registrant and Theresa Mitchell.
|
|
10
|
.19**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 10, 2006, between the Registrant and Mike Wokasch.
|
|
10
|
.20**
|
|
Form of Director Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.21**
|
|
Consultant Agreement, dated
October 1, 2005, by and between the Registrant and White
Moon Medical.
|
|
10
|
.22**
|
|
Leasing Agreement, dated
May 5, 2006, made by and between Mr. Jose
Alfonso I. Orozco Perez and Oculus technologies of Mexico,
S.A. de C.V.
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Lease,
dated August 23, 2006, by and between the Registrant and
RNM Lakeville, L.P.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between the Registrant, Quimica Pasteur, S
de R.L., Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez and Jorge Paulino
Hermosillo Martin.
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Framework Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between Javier Orozco Gutierrez, Quimica
Pasteur, S de R.L., Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin, the
Registrant and Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Mercantile Consignment Agreement,
dated June 16, 2005, between Oculus Technologies de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. and Francisco Javier
Orozco Gutierrez.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Partnership Interest Purchase
Option Agreement, dated June 16, 2005, between the
Registrant and Javier Orozco Gutierrez.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin
(translated from Spanish).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez
(translated from Spanish).
|
|
16
|
.1
|
|
Letter regarding change in
certifying accountants.
|
|
21
|
.1**
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Marcum &
Kliegman LLP.
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Cheryl Bongiovanni,
Ph.D., RVT, CWS
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Tom A. Wolvos, M.D.,
F.A.C.S
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of David Armstrong, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of David E. Allie, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.7
|
|
Consent of Dr. Alfredo Barrera
|
|
23
|
.8
|
|
Consent of Valuation Research
Corporation
|
|
23
|
.9
|
|
Consent of Chevez, Ruiz, Zamarripa
y Cia, S.C.
|
|
23
|
.10
|
|
Consent of Luca
Dalla-Paola,
M.D.
|
|
23
|
.11
|
|
Consent of Andrew Boulton, M.D.
|
|
23
|
.12
|
|
Consent of Dr. Ariel Miranda
|
|
24
|
.1**
|
|
Power of Attorney (see
page II-5
of this Registration Statement).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
To be filed by amendment.
|