As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2007
Registration Statement No. 333-140367
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 2
to
FORM SB-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
2990
|
|
20-2110031
|
(State or jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
6330 West Loop South, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77401
(713) 579-0600
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Timothy E. Vail
President and Chief Executive Officer
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc.
6330 West Loop South, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77401
Telephone: (713) 579-0600
Facsimile: (713) 579-0610
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Copies to:
Robert G. Reedy
Porter & Hedges, L.L.P.
1000 Main Street, 36
th
Floor
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: (713) 226-6000
Facsimile: (713) 228-1331
Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective
date of the registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous
basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in
connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the
following box:
þ
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b)
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for
the same offering.
o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering.
o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering.
o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box.
o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of Securities
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Registration
|
|
|
To be Registered
|
|
|
Registered (1)
|
|
|
Per Share (1)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fee(2)
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
|
8,000,000 shares
|
|
|
$6.75
|
|
|
$54,000,000
|
|
|
$1,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with
Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, based on the average of the minimum and the
maximum proposed initial offering prices of $5.75 and $7.75, respectively, for the shares
of common stock offered for resale hereby.
|
(2)
|
|
A registration fee of $4,922 has been previously paid with respect to
these shares.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary
to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically
states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with
Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall
become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed.
The selling stockholders may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an
offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
Subject to completion dated May 1, 2007
Preliminary Prospectus
8,000,000 Shares
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc.
Common Stock
This prospectus relates to the sale or other disposition of up to 8,000,000 shares of our
issued and outstanding common stock, or interests therein, by the selling stockholders identified
in this prospectus. The selling stockholders may, from time to time, sell, transfer or otherwise
dispose of any or all of their shares of common stock or interests in shares of common stock on any
stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private
transactions. These dispositions may be at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time
of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price, at varying prices determined at the time
of sale, or at negotiated prices. Because there is no trading market in our common stock as of the
date of this prospectus, the selling stockholders intend to sell any shares in the public market at
prices ranging from $5.75 to $7.75 per share until a public market develops for the common stock.
Once a public market develops for the common stock, the selling stockholders may sell their shares
of common stock in the public market based on the market price at the time of sale or at negotiated
prices. The selling stockholders may also sell their shares in transactions that are not in the
public market in the manner set forth under Plan of Distribution.
We are not offering any shares of our common stock for sale under this prospectus, and we will
not receive any of the proceeds from the sale or other disposition of the shares covered hereby, or
interests therein, by the selling stockholders.
Our common stock is traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol SYMX. The last reported sale
price for our common stock on the Pink Sheets on April 27, 2007 was $6.75.
Investing in our common stock involves significant risks that are described in the Risk Factors
section beginning on page 2 of this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or
disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is , 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized
anyone to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer of our common stock in
any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the information contained in
this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of this prospectus.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary should be read together with the information contained in other parts of
this prospectus and the documents we incorporate by reference to fully understand the offering as
well as the other considerations that are important to you in making a decision about whether to
invest in our common stock. As used in this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires,
we, the Company, us, our or Synthesis refers to Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise. We have
provided definitions for some of the industry terms used in this registration statement in the
Glossary of Terms in Appendix A.
Our Company
We are an emerging development stage company involved in the global development and
commercialization of gasification technology. As described further herein, our principal asset is
an exclusive license with the Gas Technology Institute (GTI), a U.S. based non-profit research
and development organization, for their U-GAS
®
coal gasification technology.
Our principal executive offices are located at 6330 West Loop South, Suite 300, Houston, Texas
77401, and our phone number is (713) 579-0600. Our website address is www.synthesisenergy.com.
Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not
constitute part of this prospectus.
The Offering
Common stock offered:
|
|
|
By us
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
By the selling stockholders
|
|
8,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding after the offering
|
|
28,183,715 shares
(1)
|
|
|
|
Pink Sheets symbol
|
|
SYMX
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale or
other disposition of the
shares covered hereby, or
interests therein, by the
selling stockholders. See
Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
See Risk Factors beginning
on page 2 and other
information included in this
prospectus for a discussion of
factors you should carefully
consider before deciding to
invest in shares of our common
stock.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The number of shares shown to be outstanding is based on the number of shares of our common
stock outstanding as of May 1, 2007, and does not include shares reserved for issuance upon
the exercise of options granted or available under our stock incentive plan. As of May 1,
2007, we had outstanding options to purchase 5,417,500 shares of our common stock with a
weighted average exercise price of $3.26 per share.
|
1
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider
carefully the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information included in, or
incorporated by reference into, this prospectus, including our financial statements and related
notes, before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risks or
uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition and operating results would likely
suffer. In that event, the market price of the offered securities could decline and you could lose
all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock.
Risks Related to our Business
We are a newly organized company and our business plans and strategies may not be accepted in the
marketplace.
We began operations in November of 2003 as Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc., a corporation
formed under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, and have a limited operating history. Our
proposed business plans and strategies described in this registration statement incorporate our
senior managements current best analysis of potential markets, opportunities and difficulties that
face us. No assurance can be given that the underlying assumptions accurately reflect current
trends in the energy services industry or our consumers reaction to our products and services or
that such will be successful. In addition, our plans may and likely will change substantially from
time to time as our senior management reassesses its opportunities and reallocates its resources,
and any such plans may be changed or abandoned at any time. Our strategies remain untested and
there is no assurance that our business plans and strategies can be successfully implemented and
executed.
We will utilize a technology with a limited commercial history. If the U-GAS
®
technology fails to
gain or loses market acceptance, our business will suffer.
Although GTI is one of the worlds leading energy research and development organizations with
well-equipped research facilities, it does not have marketing resources to fully commercialize its
U-GAS
®
technology. To date, U-GAS
®
technology has not been used in a large number of commercial
facilities. There is a risk that the U-GAS
®
technology will not meet reliability or efficiency
targets. If U-GAS
®
technology is not generally accepted as a low cost energy alternative and we
are unable to effectively manage the implementation of the U-GAS
®
technology, our business and
operating results could be seriously harmed.
We may require additional funding, and our failure to raise additional capital necessary to support
and expand our operations could reduce our ability to compete and could harm our business.
We have spent or plan to spend the following within the next twelve months; (i) approximately
$12.4 million related to construction of a coal gasification plant through our joint venture with
Hai Hua (described under BusinessCurrent Projects), which includes a $9.1 million equity
contribution by the Company and a loan by the Company to our joint venture with Hai Hua of $3.3
million; (ii) approximately $2.2 million of operating costs; and (iii) approximately $800,000 of
project development expenses. On March 22, 2007 we completed a loan transaction with the
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) to fund (i) above. See Plan of Operations for
more on this loan. As of March 30, 2007, we had approximately $3 million of cash in our banks, in
addition to approximately $18.4 million of cash in the Joint Venture.
As described in more detail in Plan of Operations, over the next twelve months, we also plan
to continue to advance the commercial development of U-GAS
®
based projects in China and selected
locations in the United States, and to further expand our global engineering and project execution
team to complete future projects which are currently contemplated. In the next few months, we plan
to raise
2
approximately $25 million to $50 million in order to implement these strategies in
furtherance of our business plan. We may need to raise additional funds sooner in order to fund
more rapid expansion, cover unexpected construction costs or delays, replace flawed equipment,
develop new or enhanced energy services or products, respond to competitive pressures or to acquire
complementary energy related products, services, businesses or technologies. We intend to rely on
commercial banks to finance or refinance some portion of our project costs. We may also offer debt
or equity securities to fulfill our other cash requirements. There can be no assurances that
financing will be available to us in the future on acceptable terms or at all. If we cannot raise
required funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to, among other things (i) develop,
implement or enhance our energy related products and services; (ii) negotiate and enter into new
gasification plant development contracts; (iii) expand our operations; (iv) hire and train
employees; or (v) respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated capital requirements.
The termination of our license agreement with GTI or our joint venture with Hai Hua could
materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our license agreement with GTI for the U-GAS
®
technology (described under BusinessGTI
License Agreement) and our joint venture with Hai Hua (described under BusinessCurrent
Projects) are essential to the Company and its future development. The license agreement
terminates on August 31, 2016, but may be terminated by GTI upon certain events of default if not
cured by the Company within specified time periods. In addition, after the two extension periods
provided under the license agreement, there is no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining an
extension of the term of the license in the future at a royalty rate that we believe to be
reasonable or at all. Our joint venture with Hai Hua terminates on July 6, 2056, but may be
terminated due to certain events of bankruptcy and if the purchase and sale contract for syngas is
terminated. The purchase contract terminates on October 22, 2026, but may be terminated by Hai Hua
upon certain events of default. Termination of the joint venture would require us to seek another
collaborative relationship in that territory. There is no assurance that a suitable alternative
third party would be identified, and even if identified, there is no assurance that the terms of
any new relationship would be commercially acceptable to us.
Our lack of an operating history, any significant assets or any meaningful revenue or profits makes
it difficult to evaluate our business prospects and there can be no assurance of our future
profitability.
We are a development stage company and our lack of operating history precludes us from
forecasting operating expenses based on historical results. We do not have any significant assets,
other than our license agreement with GTI for the U-GAS
®
technology (described under BusinessGTI
License Agreement), and have not generated any revenues from our business. If we are unable to
develop the U-GAS
®
technology and successfully enter into and implement contracts with industrial
complexes, and provide energy services to these customers and reduce their energy costs and manage
our business and operations, we may never achieve profitability. You should evaluate our business
and prospects given the risks, difficulties, expenses and challenges we may encounter because we
are a development stage company in a rapidly evolving market. Even if we do achieve profitability,
it may not be sustainable, and we cannot predict the level of such profitability.
Our products and services are in an early stage of development and we may never be able to reach
agreement regarding the completion of a project.
All of our other potential development opportunities are in the early stages of development
and/or contract negotiations. Our joint venture with Hai Hua discussed herein under Business
Current Projects is currently our only negotiated contract. We must undertake the time-consuming
and costly process of fulfilling the requirements of requests for proposals and negotiating
contracts before offering our services to industrial complexes. We are unsure of when, if ever,
many of these contracts will be negotiated, executed and implemented. There are many reasons that
we may fail in our efforts to negotiate, execute and implement contracts with our target customers
to provide cost efficient energy services, including the possibility that: (i) our products and
services will be ineffective; (ii) our products
3
and services will be cost prohibitive or will not
achieve broad market acceptance; (iii) competitors will offer superior products and services; or
(iv) competitors will offer their products and services at a lower cost.
We will manage the design, procurement and construction of our plants. If our management of these
issues fails, our business and operating results could suffer.
For our joint venture with Hai Hua (described under BusinessCurrent Projects), and possibly
for other projects we may work on in the future, we are managing plant design, procurement of
equipment, and supervising construction. Most of this work has been subcontracted to third parties
with the Company coordinating and supervising these tasks. The Company believes that this is the
most time and cost effective way to build gasification plants in China and elsewhere, but the
Company does bear the risk of cost and schedule overruns and quality control. If we do not
properly manage the design, procurement and construction of our plants, our business and operating
results could be seriously harmed.
Our results of operations could be negatively affected by potential fluctuations in exchange rates
with China.
Any decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to foreign currencies could increase
the cost of the services provided to us upon contract expirations. There can be no assurance that
we will be able to offset any such increases and any failure to do so could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may in the future engage
in hedging activities to protect operations and future obligations in foreign currencies, which
could adversely affect our business and operating results.
We are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks as a result of our business in
China. Although the Chinese Yuan has historically been largely pegged to the U.S. dollar, which has
minimized our foreign currency exchange rate risk in China, recently, the Chinese Yuan has been
allowed to float against to the U.S. dollar, and therefore, we will be exposed to additional
foreign currency exchange rate risk. This risk will also increase as we continue to increase our
activities in other foreign countries.
Our operations in China may be adversely affected by evolving economic, political and social
conditions.
Our operations are subject to risk inherent in doing business internationally. Such risks
include the adverse effects on operations from war, international terrorism, civil disturbances,
political instability, governmental activities and deprivation of contract and property rights. In
particular, since 1978, the Chinese government has been reforming its economic and political
systems, and we expect this to continue. Although we believe that these reforms have had a positive
effect on the economic development of China and have improved our ability to do business in China,
we cannot assure you that these reforms will continue or that the Chinese government will not take
actions that impair our operations or assets in China. In addition, periods of international unrest
may impede our ability to do business in other countries and could have a material adverse effect
on our business and results of operations.
Long-term offtake agreements could be difficult to enforce because of Chinas underdeveloped legal
system.
Our project level subsidiary revenues may be derived from long-term offtake agreements for
syngas, power and other commodities. If a commodity purchaser ceases payment, there is less
certainty under Chinas legal system to seek remedies as compared to Western countries. We will
seek to mitigate this risk by (i) obtaining all requisite government approvals, (ii) developing
projects with good underlying economics, (iii) developing modular plants that can be moved away in
an extreme circumstance, (iv) using local banks to finance a majority of our project costs, and (v)
including enforceable arbitration provisions in all project agreements. The success of our
business depends in part on our ability to successfully negotiate, implement and manage the offtake
agreements. As a result, our business and
4
financial condition would be materially adversely
affected if we are unable to mitigate the offtake agreement risks.
A portion of our revenues will be derived from the merchant sales of commodities and our inability
to obtain satisfactory prices could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition to long-term offtake agreements, in certain circumstances, we plan to sell
hydrogen, nitrogen, elemental sulfur, ash and other commodities into the merchant market. These
sales may not be subject to long-term offtake agreements and the price will be dictated by the then
prevailing market price. Revenues from such sales may fluctuate and may not be consistent or
predictable. Our business and financial condition would be materially adversely affected if we are
unable to obtain satisfactory prices for these commodities or if prospective buyers do not purchase
these commodities.
Our results of operations may fluctuate.
Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis during our short operating history and
may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our
control. Factors that may affect our quarterly operating results include: (i) our ability to
retain new customers; (ii) the announcement or introduction of services and products by us or our
competitors; (iii) the success and acceptance of U-GAS
®
technology; (iv) pricing competition; (v)
shortages of equipment, raw materials, or fuel; (vi) approvals by various government agencies;
(vii) the inability to obtain land use rights for our projects; and (viii) general economic
conditions as well as economic conditions specific to the energy industry.
We are dependent on key personnel who would be difficult to replace.
Our performance is substantially dependent on the continued services and on the performance of
our senior management and other key personnel. Our performance also depends on our ability to
retain and motivate our officers and key employees. The loss of the services of any of our
executive officers or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Although we have employment agreements, which
include non-competition provisions, with Timothy Vail, our President and Chief Executive Officer,
David Eichinger, our Chief Financial Officer and certain other of our key employees, as a practical
matter, those agreements will not assure the retention of our employees and we may not be able to
enforce all of the provisions in either employment agreement, including the non-competition
provisions. Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train,
retain and motivate other highly skilled technical, managerial, marketing and customer service
personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will
be able to successfully attract, integrate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. In
addition, because a large portion of operations are currently in China, we will be required to
retain personnel who reside in, or are willing to travel to, and who speak the language and
understand the customs of, China. Our inability to retain these types of individual could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to grow and diversify, which in turn will require
that we manage and control our growth effectively.
Our business strategy contemplates growth and diversification. As we add to our services, our
number of customers, and our marketing and sales efforts, our operating expenses and capital
requirements will increase. Our ability to manage growth effectively will require that we continue
to expend funds to improve our operational, financial and management controls, as well as reporting
systems and procedures. In addition, we must effectively expand, train and manage our employees.
We will be unable to manage our business effectively if we are unable to alleviate the strain on
resources caused by growth in a timely and successful manner. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to manage our growth and a failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
5
We face intense competition. If we cannot gain a market share among our competition, we may not
earn revenues and our business may be harmed.
The business of providing energy is highly competitive. In the gasification market, large
multi-national industrial companies such as General Electric, Shell, ConocoPhillips, Siemens, and
small Chinese firms (with fluidized beds and fixed bed technologies) offer coal gasification
equipment and services. Although we do not directly compete with the multi-national firms, their
activities in the marketplace may negatively impact our operations and our ability to attract
quality projects. In addition, new competitors, some of whom may have extensive experience in
related fields or greater financial resources, may enter the market. Increased competition could
result in a loss of contracts and market share. Either of these results could seriously harm our
business and operating results. In addition, there are a number of gasification and conventional,
non-gasification, coal-based alternatives for producing heat and power that could compete with our
technology in specific situations. If we are unable to effectively compete with other sources of
energy, our business and operating results could be seriously harmed.
In our areas of operation, the projects we intend to build will face rigorous environmental
regulations, review and approval. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such
approvals or maintain them once granted.
Our operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into environment or otherwise relating to environmental
protection. Numerous governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
various Chinese authorities, issue regulations to implement and enforce such laws, which often
require difficult and costly compliance measures that carry substantial administrative, civil and
criminal penalties or may result in injunctive relief for failure to comply. These laws and
regulations may require the acquisition of a permit before operations at a facility commence,
restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various substances that can be released into
the environment in connection with such activities, limit or prohibit construction activities on
certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, ecologically sensitive and other protected areas,
and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations. We believe that we
are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations and we
have not experienced any material adverse effect from compliance with these environmental
requirements.
In China, developing and constructing gasification facilities is highly regulated. In the
development stage of a project, the key government approvals are the projects environmental impact
assessment report, feasibility study (also known as the project application report) and, in the
case of a Sino-foreign joint venture, approval of the joint venture companys joint venture
contract and articles of association. Approvals in China are required at the municipal, provincial
and/or central government levels depending on the total investment in the project.
Although we have been successful in obtaining the permits that are required at this stage of
our development, any retroactive change in regulations or an opinion that the approvals that have
been obtained are inadequate, either at the federal, provincial or state level, could require us to
obtain additional or new permits or spend considerable resources on complying with such
regulations. Other developments, such as the enactment of more stringent environmental laws and
regulations, could require us to incur significant capital expenditures.
6
We may have difficulty managing the government approval process which could delay the
implementation of our business plan.
Selling syngas, electricity and other commodities is highly regulated in many markets around
the world. We believe our projects will be supported by the governmental agencies in which they
will operate because coal-based technologies, which put less of a burden on the environment, are
generally encouraged by most governments. However, in China and other developing markets, the
regulatory environment is often uncertain and can change quickly, often with contradictory
regulations being issued. In some cases, government officials have different interpretations of
such regulations and project approvals that are obtained by the Company could later be deemed to be
inadequate or new regulations could require that additional levels of approval be obtained. If we
are unable to effectively manage the government approval process in the markets in which we intend
to operate, our business prospects and operating results could be seriously harmed.
We are dependent on the availability and cost of fuel supplies and our inability to obtain a
low-cost source could have an impact on our business.
Our projects may depend on the supply of low cost fuel, the supply of which could be
interrupted by shortages and/or transportation bottlenecks. We intend to locate projects in areas
where low cost fuels are available, or where low cost fuels can be moved to a project site by bulk
commodity transport services, thereby eliminating transportation bottlenecks. If we are unable to
effectively obtain a source of low-cost feedstock for our projects, our business and operating
results could be seriously harmed.
We face the potential inability to protect our intellectual property rights which could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We rely on proprietary technology from GTI. Our license agreement with GTI for the U-GAS
®
technology (described under BusinessGTI License Agreement) is a critical component of our
business. GTIs proprietary technical know-how is critical to the use of the technology and
certain of the patents granted around the U-GAS
®
technology have expired. We are improving the
technology and we plan to create new technologies around the core U-GAS
®
technology and to seek
patent protections for these improvements and new technologies. Proprietary rights relating to the
U-GAS
®
technology are protected from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that they
are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are maintained in confidence. There can be no
assurance that patents will be issued from any pending or future patent applications owned by or
licensed to the Company or that the claims allowed under any issued patents will be sufficiently
broad to protect the Companys technology. In the absence of patent protection, the Company may be
vulnerable to competitors who attempt to copy the Companys technology or gain access to its
proprietary information and technical know-how. In addition, the Company relies on proprietary
information and technical know-how that it seeks to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements
with its collaborators, employees, and consultants. There can be no assurance that these agreements
will not be breached, that the Company would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that the
Companys trade secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by
competitors.
Proceedings initiated by the Company to protect its proprietary rights could result in
substantial costs to the Company. There can be no assurance that competitors of the Company will
not initiate litigation to challenge the validity of the Companys patents, or that they will not
use their resources to design comparable products that do not infringe upon the Companys patents.
There may also be pending or issued patents held by parties not affiliated with the Company that
relate to the Companys products or technologies. The Company may need to acquire licenses to, or
contest the validity of, any such patents. There can be no assurance that any license required
under any such patent would be made available on acceptable terms or that the Company would prevail
in any such contest. The Company could incur substantial costs in defending itself in suits brought
against it or in suits in which the Company may assert its patent rights against others. If the
outcome of any such litigation is unfavorable to the Company, the Companys business and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
7
Foreign laws may not afford us sufficient protections for our intellectual property, and we may not
be able to obtain patent protection outside the United States.
Despite continuing international pressure on the Chinese government, intellectual property
rights protection continues to present significant challenges to foreign investors, and,
increasingly, Chinese companies. China has put in place a comprehensive system of intellectual
property laws; however, incidents of infringement are common and enforcement of rights can, in
practice, be difficult. With the assistance of our Chinese and US intellectual property counsel,
we have developed a strategy for managing our intellectual property rights in China, the United
States and elsewhere. Even though our first-mover advantage is our best protection against
intellectual property rights infringements and/or competitive threats, we have the option to take
some or all of the following steps: (i) place tangible protections on intellectual property,
especially GTIs know-how, including compartmentalization of information and tracking access to
sensitive design information, which may include restricting access to computer systems by locking
disc drives, installing security systems on computers that would not allow files to be copied or
uploaded for e-mail transmission, restricting a computer users ability to print sensitive files,
and/or using encryption, (ii) designate a special project room with security and limited access for
design work, (iii) develop a solid patent registration portfolio, (iv) register technology licenses
with the appropriate authorities, and use contractual mechanisms consistent with Chinese law to
provide a basis for enforcement, (v) conduct thorough due diligence of any partners with whom
technology will be shared or licensed and ensure alignment of economic interests with such
partners, (vi) copyright all engineering design and product design blueprints, (vii) enter into
strict confidentiality agreements, (viii) aggressively monitor the market for infringements, (ix)
take swift and immediate action at the first signs of infringement, or (x) develop relationships
with local authorities where intellectual property rights are licensed or otherwise used. If we
are unable to manage our intellectual property rights, our business and operating results may be
seriously harmed.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
We may have a contingent liability arising out of the issuance of shares by Tamborine.
As discussed elsewhere herein, Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc., a corporation formed under the
laws of the British Virgin Islands (Synthesis BVI), and Synthesis Energy Systems, LLC, a West
Virginia limited liability company (Synthesis LLC), were formed as sister companies in November
of 2003 to engage in the business of development and commercialization of the U-GAS
®
technology.
The founders of Synthesis BVI believed that it was important to be a publicly traded company in
order to obtain the capital necessary to engage in this business. Tamborine Holdings, Inc., a
shell company trading on the Pink Sheets (Tamborine), a centralized quotation service that
collects and publishes market maker quotes for securities traded in the over-the-counter market
(the Pink Sheets), was receptive to a combination transaction with Synthesis BVI. As such, on
April 18, 2005, pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement), SES
Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tamborine, merged with and into Synthesis
Energy Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation (Synthesis Florida), whereby the holders of common
stock of Synthesis Florida became shareholders of, and Synthesis Florida became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of, Tamborine. As a condition of the above merger, Synthesis Florida completed a
restructuring whereby each of Synthesis BVI and Synthesis LLC became wholly owned subsidiaries of
Synthesis Florida. On April 27, 2005, Tamborine changed its name to Synthesis Energy Systems,
Inc. and on June 27, 2005, reincorporated in the state of Delaware. At the time of the merger,
there were 100,000,000 shares of Tamborine common stock outstanding, 94,000,000 of which were
cancelled in connection with the merger. The remaining 6,000,000 shares became shares of the
Company as the surviving entity as a result of the name change and the reincorporation. An
additional 21,000,000 restricted shares were issued as consideration in the merger to former
shareholders of Synthesis Florida, all of whom were accredited investors.
8
Tamborine made numerous representations and warranties in the Agreement, including a
representation that all prior offers and sales of its common stock were duly registered or exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities laws.
As noted above, one of the principal reasons that Synthesis Florida completed the merger was to
have access to a public trading market, and Tamborine had represented that its shares were eligible
for trading, and in fact were trading, on the Pink Sheets. The Companys current management team,
which took office beginning in May of 2006, re-examined the facts surrounding the Tamborine
issuances prior to the merger and now believes that Tamborines representation in the Agreement as
to its compliance with federal and state securities laws was incorrect. Although the Companys
current management has not been able to locate any definitive records regarding the prior issuances
of Tamborine, they have been able to determine the following details.
Tamborine was formed in May 2004, and in connection with its formation, issued 100,000,000
shares of its common stock to its three founders, including IFG Investment Services, Inc. (IFG).
The certificates issued to two of the three founders contained the appropriate restrictive legend
limiting transfer of the shares as is customary in an unregistered private placement. However, the
certificate issued to IFG for 7,500,000 shares was apparently issued without such restrictive
legends. In June 2004, IFG delivered its certificate to Transfer Online, which thereafter began
acting as the transfer agent for Tamborines common stock. Subsequently, on December 2, 2004, IFG
sold these shares to Ford Allen, Inc., and 1,500,000 of these shares were subsequently cancelled by
the Company. In January 2005, a broker-dealer diligence form was filed by Tamborine with the Pink
Sheets under Rule 15c2-11 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) stating that 6,000,000 shares of Tamborine common stock had been sold in 2004 pursuant to an
exemption from registration under Rule 504 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act). It is our belief that this Rule 15c2-11 form was filed to permit trading of the
common stock of Tamborine on the Pink Sheets. On March 29, 2005, a second Rule 15c2-11 filing was
made by Tamborine which stated that there were 7,500,000 freely tradable shares in the float,
meaning that those shares could be traded on the Pink Sheets, and also stating that 6,000,000
shares had been sold in 2004 to three investors in Texas under Rule 504.
It is our belief that 6,000,000 shares of the 7,500,000 shares that were represented to be
freely tradable in Tamborines second 15c2-11 filing, and which remained outstanding after the
merger, were not in fact freely tradable when issued. As noted above, there are no available
definitive records, other than the two Rule 15c2-11 filings, regarding the issuance of those shares
or the possible exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws that were used
to issue the shares or permit trading of the shares on the Pink Sheets. IFG has not provided an
opinion of counsel confirming that these shares were issued, and subsequently transferred, subject
to an available exemption. Moreover, the representation in the 15c2-11 filing that issuing these
shares under Rule 504 permits those shares to become freely tradable is likely not correct.
Under Rule 504, any shares sold thereunder are restricted shares and may not be sold in the
public markets without the use of an exemption from registration. We believe that IFG may have
based its view on an incorrect and outdated interpretation of Rule 504. This means that resales of
these shares by IFG and subsequently Ford Allen, Inc. on the Pink Sheets may have been in violation
of applicable securities laws because the shares were in fact restricted. Trading by subsequent
holders may have been in accordance with applicable securities laws based on other available
exemptions, but we do not have any documentation to confirm any such conclusions.
We are currently taking a number of steps to deal with these issues. We have notified our
transfer agent to cease any further transfers of our common stock without the approval of
management. Additionally, we may request that Ford Allen, Inc. surrender its remaining shares of
common stock in return for restricted shares and/or for cancellation. We have no reason to
believe, at this time, that Ford Allen, Inc. will respond to our request. We also contacted all
stockholders who purchased shares of common stock in our May 2005 and August 2006 private
placements to inform them of these issues and gave them the opportunity to have the aggregate
purchase price that they paid returned, plus interest. The offer period expired on March 20, 2007,
and none of the stockholders elected to accept the offer. We are also filing this registration
statement on Form SB-2 to (a) cause the Company to become a reporting company under the Exchange
Act, which simplifies the use of Rule 144 to trade Company securities for
9
eligible stockholders,
provides information that is more complete to stockholders and is a key requirement for listing on
a national securities exchange, and (b) register resales of shares held by certain stockholders of
the Company, which provides them with an opportunity to dispose of shares using the registration
statement without any limitations on volume or concerns about the issues noted above. Lastly, the
Company filed an updated 15c2-11 filing on February 6, 2007 to provide current and correct
information about the Company and the above matters. Tamborines promoters or their
affiliates and their transferees, within the meaning of the Securities Act, both before and
after the Merger (as described in BusinessGeneral), are deemed to be underwriters within the
meaning of the Securities Act. Any commissions or discounts given to any such broker-dealer may be
regarded as underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. As such, regardless of
technical compliance with Rule 144 under the Act, because Tamborine was a shell company prior to
the Merger, Rule 144 will be unavailable to its promoters and affiliates and their transferees.
As noted above, many aspects of these events cannot be corroborated by documentary evidence or
otherwise. In addition, there is not sufficient evidence relating to the trading history of our
common stock to analyze the range of potential damages, if any, arising out of these events. In
fact, the trading price for our stock has generally increased since it began trading on the Pink
Sheets, and we have made progress in executing its business plan, so it is possible that these
events have not generated significant liabilities. Of course, federal and state regulatory
agencies could also examine these events and commence proceedings against the Company, its officers
and directors (former and current) and the other individuals involved. We do maintain officer and
director liability insurance, and would of course utilize that coverage, if it is available under
the terms of the policy, in the event any liabilities are assessed against officers and directors.
Given the above facts, it is not possible at this time to predict the likelihood that the Company
will in fact have any liability arising out of these events or the amount of such liability, if
any.
Our historic stock price has been volatile and the future market price for our common stock is
likely to continue to be volatile. Furthermore, the limited market for our shares could make our
price more volatile. This may make it difficult for you to sell our common stock for a positive
return on your investment.
The public market for our common stock has historically been very volatile. Any future market
price for our shares is likely to continue to be very volatile. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006, our common stock has traded at prices as low as $3.00 per share and as high as
$9.75 per share. This price volatility may make it more difficult for you to sell shares when you
want at prices you find attractive. We do not know of any one particular factor that has caused
volatility in our stock price. However, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price
and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of companies. Broad market factors and the investing publics negative perception of
our business may reduce our stock price, regardless of our operating performance.
Further, the market for our common stock is limited and we cannot assure you that a larger
market will ever be developed or maintained. The average daily trading volume of our common stock
has historically been insignificant and on some trading days, we have had no volume in our common
stock. Market fluctuations and volatility, as well as general economic, market and political
conditions, could reduce our market price. Should additional equity be issued by us in the future,
we cannot assure you that a more active trading market will develop. As a result, this may make it
difficult or impossible for you to sell our common stock or to sell our common stock for a positive
return on your investment.
10
Our securities have been thinly traded on the Pink Sheets, which may not provide liquidity for our
investors.
Our securities are quoted on the Pink Sheets. The Pink Sheets are an inter-dealer,
over-the-counter market that provides significantly less liquidity than national or regional
exchanges. Securities traded on the Pink Sheets are usually thinly traded, highly volatile, have
fewer market makers and are not followed by analysts. The order handling rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) do not apply to securities quoted on the Pink Sheets. Quotes for
stocks included on the Pink Sheets are not listed in newspapers. Therefore, prices for securities
traded solely on the Pink Sheets may be difficult to obtain and holders of our securities may be
unable to resell their securities at or near their original acquisition price, or at any price. We
cannot give any assurance that we will be able to meet, or, if met, maintain, the listing standards
of any national or regional exchanges.
Investors must contact a broker-dealer to trade over-the-counter bulletin board securities. As a
result, you may not be able to buy or sell our securities at the times that you may wish.
Even though our securities are quoted on the Pink Sheets, the Pink Sheets may not permit our
investors to sell securities when and in the manner that they wish. Because there are no automated
systems for negotiating trades on the Pink Sheets, they are conducted via telephone or the
Internet. In times of heavy market volume, the limitations of this process may result in a
significant increase in the time it takes to execute investor orders. Therefore, when investors
place market orders an order to buy or sell a specific number of shares at the current market price
it is possible for the price of a stock to go up or down significantly during the lapse of time
between placing a market order and its execution.
Our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules of the SEC and the trading market in our
securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of
an investment in our stock.
The SEC has adopted Rule 3a51-1 which establishes the definition of a penny stock, for the
purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that (i) has a market price of less than $5.00 per
share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, or (ii) is not registered on a
national securities exchange or listed on an automated quotation system sponsored by a national
securities exchange. Although our common stock currently trades for more than $5.00 per share, it
has traded below this threshold at various periods of time in the past. For any transaction
involving a penny stock, unless exempt, Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act requires:
|
|
|
that a broker or dealer approve a persons account for transactions in penny stocks;
and
|
|
|
|
|
the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction,
setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
|
In order to approve a persons account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer
must:
|
|
|
obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
|
|
|
|
|
make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for
that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to
be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
|
11
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a
disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight
form:
|
|
|
sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination;
and
|
|
|
|
|
attests that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the
investor prior to the transaction.
|
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public
offerings and in secondary trading, and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and
the registered representative. Current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies
and to be available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly
statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the
account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Generally, brokers may be less
willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the penny stock rules. This may make it
more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value
of our stock.
Substantial sales of our common stock by the selling stockholders or us could cause our stock price
to decline and issuances by us may dilute your ownership interest in our company.
The 8,000,000 shares covered by this prospectus represents approximately 28% of our
outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis. We are unable to predict the amount or timing
of sales by the selling stockholders of our common stock. Any sales of substantial amounts of our
common stock in the public market by the selling stockholders or us, or the perception that these
sales might occur, could lower the market price of our common stock. As described in more detail
in Plan of Operations, in the next few months, we plan to raise approximately $25 million to $50
million through debt or equity financing in order to implement strategies in furtherance of our
business plan. If we issue additional equity securities to raise this additional capital, your
ownership interest in the Company may be diluted and the value of your investment may be reduced.
The market valuation of our business may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control and the value
of your investment may fluctuate correspondingly.
The market valuation of energy companies, such as us, frequently fluctuate due to factors
unrelated to the past or present operating performance of such companies. Our market valuation may
fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control,
including:
|
|
|
changes in securities analysts estimates of our financial performance, although there
are currently no analysts covering our stock;
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes, particularly among securities of
energy companies;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new technologies,
acquisitions, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices;
|
|
|
|
|
loss of a major customer or failure to complete significant commercial contracts;
|
12
|
|
|
loss of a relationship with a partner; and
|
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel.
|
As a result, the value of your investment in us may fluctuate.
Investors should not look to dividends as a source of income.
In the interest of reinvesting initial profits back into our business, we do not intend to pay
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, any economic return will initially be
derived, if at all, from appreciation in the fair market value of our stock, and not as a result of
dividend payments.
13
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those projected. Among those risks, trends and
uncertainties are our early stage of development, our estimate of the sufficiency of existing
capital sources, our ability to raise additional capital to fund cash requirements for future
operations, the limited history and viability of our technology, our results of operations in
foreign countries and our ability to diversify. Although we believe that in making such
forward-looking statements our expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions, such statements
may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially
different from those projected. We cannot assure you that the assumptions upon which these
statements are based will prove to have been correct.
When used in this registration statement on Form SB-2, the words expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, believe, seek, estimate and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying
words. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual results
could differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements for a
number of important reasons, including those discussed under Plan of Operation, and elsewhere in
this registration statement on Form SB-2.
You should read these statements carefully because they discuss our expectations about our
future performance, contain projections of our future operating results or our future financial
condition, or state other forward-looking information. Before you invest in our common stock, you
should be aware that the occurrence of certain of the events described in this registration
statement on Form SB-2 could substantially harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our common
stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
We cannot guarantee any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any of the forward-looking
statements in this registration statement on Form SB-2 after the date hereof.
14
BUSINESS
General
We are an emerging development stage company involved in the global development and
commercialization of gasification technology. We have not earned any operating revenue as of the
date of this filing. As described further herein, our principal asset is an exclusive license with
GTI for their U-GAS
®
gasification technology. Our license agreement with GTI has an initial term
of ten years beginning on August 31, 2006, but may be extended for two additional ten years terms
at the option of the Company. See License Agreement with GTI for more information.
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc., a corporation formed under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands (Synthesis BVI), and Synthesis Energy Systems, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability
company (Synthesis LLC), were formed as sister companies in November of 2003 to engage in the
business of development and commercialization of the U-GAS
®
technology. On April 18, 2005,
pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement), SES Acquisition
Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tamborine Holdings, Inc., a Mississippi corporation
(Tamborine), merged with and into Synthesis Energy Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation
(Synthesis Florida), whereby the holders of common stock of Synthesis Florida became shareholders
of, and Synthesis Florida became a wholly-owned subsidiary of, Tamborine (the Merger). As a
condition of the above merger, Synthesis Florida completed a restructuring whereby each of
Synthesis BVI, Synthesis LLC, International Hydrogen Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation, and
Innovative Engines, Inc., a Florida corporation became wholly owned subsidiaries of Synthesis
Florida. On April 27, 2005, Tamborine changed its name to Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. and on
June 27, 2005, reincorporated in the state of Delaware. During 2006, International Hydrogen
Technologies, Inc. and Innovative Engines, Inc. were dissolved.
We have provided definitions for some of the industry terms used in this registration
statement, and in particular, this Business section, in the Glossary of Terms in Appendix A
Overview of Gasification Technology and U-GAS
®
Gasification is a technology which converts solid hydrocarbon fuels such as coal, biomass or
petroleum coke into synthesis gas, a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and other products,
otherwise referred to as syngas.
Gasification plants are extremely low emitters of certain regulated emissions, such as sulfur,
nitrous oxides and particulates and allow, if desired, for the low cost capture of greenhouse gases
such as carbon dioxide from the effluent steam. Typically, integrated gasification combined cycle
(IGCC) power plants are more efficient than conventional combustion coal power plants. According
to Green Car Congress, an energy product, policies and issues publication, conventional coal power
plants have an
15
efficiency of approximately 30%-35% while new IGCC power plants have achieved 38%-45% efficiency
with efficiency targets of 50%-60%. In addition to power and steam production, such plants can
supply a slate of chemical products including hydrogen, carbon monoxide, oxygen, nitrogen and steam
to chemical plants, petrochemical facilities, oil refineries and other industrial complexes.
Technology
Over the past 30 years, GTI has developed a fluidized bed gasification technology trademarked
U-GAS®. In January 2004 we obtained a ten-year exclusive license to the medium and high-pressure
U-GAS®
applications for certain geographic areas from GTI. As described further below,
we entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement with GTI in August 2006 which grants us
an exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell U-GAS® systems using the technology of GTI
worldwide as to coal (and as to biomass blends made of up to 40% biomass) gasification systems and
a non-exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell biomass gasification systems worldwide.
The primary advantage of U-GAS® relative to other leading gasification technologies is the
ability to efficiently gasify a wide array of fuels including wastes from coal processing
facilities, high ash coals and lignite coals. These low rank fuels may cost as little as
$0.25-1.20 per MMBtu while higher rank coals typically required by other gasification technologies
can cost significantly more than $1.50 per MMBtu. In addition, U-GAS® systems have been in
operation worldwide for over 30 years, with the most recent project being a $12 million facility at
GTIs Chicago technical campus built in 2004.
U-GAS®
Gasification Process
The U-GAS® gasification process is based on a single-stage fluidized-bed technology for
production of low-to-medium heating value syngas from a wide array of biomass feedstocks and coals
(including high-ash fuels). The U-GAS® technology was developed for gasification of all ranks of
coal as well as coal and biomass blends.
In the U-GAS® gasification process, fuel is processed and conveyed into the gasifier vessel.
Within the fluidized bed, the fuel reacts with steam, air and/or oxygen at a temperature of
840
°
C to 1100
°
C (1550
°
F to 2000
°
F). The temperature for gasification
depends on the type of fuel used and is controlled to maintain high carbon conversion and
non-slagging conditions for the ash. The U-GAS® process accomplishes four important functions in a
single-stage fluidized bed gasifier: it decakes, devolatilizes, and gasifies fuel, and if
necessary, agglomerates and separates ash from the reacting coal. The operating pressure of the
gasifier depends on the end use for the syngas and may vary from 3 to 30 bars (40 to 435 psia) or
more. After cleaning, the product gas can be used as industrial fuel gas for
16
process heating, syngas for production of methanol, ammonia, hydrogen or liquids, and for power
generation and fuel cells.
During operation, fuel is gasified rapidly within the fluidized bed and produces a gaseous
mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, water vapor and methane, in addition to small
amounts of hydrogen sulfide and other trace impurities. If the operating temperature required to
achieve acceptable carbon conversion exceeds the fuel ash softening temperature, the ash
concentration of the fluidized bed is allowed to increase until a condition is reached that allows
the ash particles to agglomerate into larger particles. The agglomerated particles are denser than
the surrounding bed material and can thus be selectively removed from the bottom of the bed.
Reactant gases, including steam, air, and/or oxygen are introduced into the gasifier in two
areas: 1) through a sloping distribution grid at the bottom of the bed and 2) through a terminal
velocity-controlled ash discharge port at the center of the distribution grid. In both
agglomerating and non-agglomerating operating modes, ash is removed by gravity from the fluidized
bed and discharged into a lockhopper system for depressurization and disposal. In both operating
modes, the gasifier maintains a low level of carbon in the bottom ash discharge stream, making
overall carbon conversion of 95% or higher possible. Cold gas efficiencies of over 80% have been
repeatedly demonstrated.
Fines purified from the fluidized bed are typically separated from the product syngas by up to
three stages of external cyclone separators, one or two of which return the fines to the fluidized
bed for increased carbon conversion. The product syngas is essentially free of tars and oils due
to the temperature and residence time of the gases in the fluidized bed, simplifying downstream
heat recovery and gas cleaning operations.
When used to gasify biomass or highly reactive wastes, an inert material such as sand,
limestone or dolomite is used to maintain the fluidized bed. In this case, most of the ash from
the fuel leaves the fluidized bed with the product syngas, with the bottom ash discharge serving
primarily to discharge tramp material entering with the biomass or waste feed.
U-GAS® Installation History
Initial Test Facility in Chicago. GTI built a large-scale U-GAS® test facility in the
Chicago area and completed installation and testing in the late 1970s. GTI continued periodic
development of U-GAS® at this facility into the 1980s and early 1990s with a focus on biomass.
These facilities ran for
17
thousands of hours and demonstrated the technical and economic viability of the technology. This
facility has since been decommissioned to make way for a more modern test facility.
U-GAS
®
Facility in Finland. In 1989, the U-GAS
®
technology for biomass fuels (and
coal blends with over 40% biomass) was licensed to Tampella Power Inc., which built a multi-fuel
pressurized pilot plant in Tampere, Finland to further develop and demonstrate the technology for
air-blown IGCC power generation with coal and biomass. This fully integrated plant includes all
gasification island components from fuel presentation through waste heat recovery and hot gas
clean-up. The facility can process up to 42 tons/day of coal and 60 tons/day of biomass at
pressures up to 435 psia. At the time of this filing, the plant has logged over 3,800 hours of
operations with 5,900 tons of fuel processed in 26 test runs. The tested fuels include biomass and
mixtures of coal and biomass.
Biomass Demonstration Project in Hawaii. In early 1990, GTI built a demonstration
project in Hawaii in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The project involved
building a medium pressure gasifier to convert sugarcane waste produced from a local sugar
processing facility. The plant was fully constructed and was successfully tested and commissioned.
However, after a period of successful operations, the local sugar grower changed the sugarcane
harvesting process resulting in a waste product that would not flow through the originally designed
fuel handling system. The DOE chose not to fund the fuel handling upgrade that was required to
process the new fuel type citing that the test was successful and the required data was gathered.
Currently the plant has been shutdown awaiting further funding.
Large Commercial Facility for Shanghai Coking and Chemical. A large low pressure,
commercial installation at Shanghai Coking and Chemical (SCC) was developed in 1994 that included
eight gasifiers with a capability at full pressure of producing over 160,000 normal cubic meter/hr
of syngas. The SCC facility, which was conceived and designed as a seasonal peaking facility,
entered commercial operation in 1995 and remained in service supplying syngas to a large chemical
complex until, in 2000, a free source of waste fuel gas became available from a neighboring sister
facility. During its six years of operations, the SCC installation experienced some operational
challenges dealing with improper coal purchasing and preparation. Despite these problems, three SCC
gasifiers reached 8,000 operating hours each by 1998, three more in 1999 and a seventh in 2000.
Total SCC gasifier operating hours exceeded 76,000 hours.
Large-scale Test Gasifier in Chicago. With historically high natural gas prices in
the U.S., GTI recently put renewed emphasis on U-GAS
®
technology and in 2004 completed a $12
million large-scale test gasifier facility on its technical campus northwest of Chicago. The
facility evaluates advanced and innovative gasification processes using all ranks of coal and other
low-cost solid fuels. The facility is also being used to facilitate commercialization of advanced
gasification and other new technologies to improve the commercial competitiveness of U-GAS
®
technology. The facilitys flexible design allows testing of a variety of syngas cleanup systems,
and the gasifier and feed system is configured to allow simultaneous co-firing of coal with biomass
or other opportunity fuels.
License Agreement with GTI
Pursuant to the Amended and Restated License Agreement dated as of August 31, 2006 between
Synthesis and GTI (the License Agreement), Synthesis has an exclusive global license to
manufacture, make, use and sell U-GAS
®
systems for coal and coal and biomass blends made of up to
40% biomass and non-exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell U-GAS
®
systems for
coal and biomass blends in excess of 40% biomass. The License Agreement has a term of ten
years, but may be extended for two additional ten-year periods at the option of Synthesis.
As consideration for the license, Synthesis paid $500,000 cash, and issued 190,500 shares of
restricted common stock, to GTI. Synthesis is also restricted from offering a competing
gasification technology during the term of the license. Additionally, for each U-GAS
®
unit which
Synthesis licenses, designs, builds or operates which uses coal, or a coal and biomass mixture, as
the feed stock, Synthesis
18
must pay a royalty based upon a calculation using the per thermal
megawatt/hr of dry syngas production of a rated design capacity, payable in installments at the
beginning and at the completion of the project build. Synthesis must also provide GTI with a copy
of each contract that Synthesis enters into relating to a U-GAS
®
system and report to GTI with
their progress on development of the technology every six months. A failure to comply with any of
the above requirements could result in the termination of the License Agreement by GTI if not cured
by the Company within specified time periods.
In addition, Synthesis was required to (i) have a contract for the sale of a U-GAS
®
system
with a customer in the territory covered by the License Agreement no later than August 31, 2007,
(ii) fabricate and put into operation at least one U-GAS
®
system by July 31, 2008 and (iii)
fabricate and put into operation at least one U-GAS
®
system for each calendar year of the License
Agreement, beginning with the calendar year 2009. The Company has satisfied the obligation to have
a contract for the sale of a U-GAS
®
system no later than August 31, 2007 through our contract with
Hai Hua described below. Additionally, Synthesis is required to disclose to GTI any improvements
related to the U-GAS
®
system which are developed and implemented by Synthesis and the manner of
using and applying such improvements. Failure to satisfy the requirements as to these milestones
could lead to the revocation of the license by GTI; provided, however, that GTI is required to give
a twelve-month notice of termination and Synthesis is able to cure the default and continue the
Agreement prior to the expiration of such time period.
During the term of the license, Synthesis has granted to GTI a royalty-free non-exclusive
irrevocable license to make, manufacture, use, market, import, offer for sale and sell U-GAS
®
systems that incorporate the improvements of Synthesis. Such license only applies outside of the
exclusive rights granted to Synthesis under the License Agreement. Without the prior written
consent of GTI, Synthesis has no right to sublicense any U-GAS
®
system other than to customers for
which Synthesis has constructed a U-GAS
®
system. For a period of ten years, Synthesis is restricted
from disclosing any confidential information (as defined in the license) to any person other than
employees of its affiliates or contractors who are required to deal with such information, and such
persons will be bound by the confidentiality provisions of the license. Synthesis further
indemnifies GTI and its affiliates from any liability or loss resulting from unauthorized
disclosure or use of any confidential information that it receives.
Market Opportunity
Over the past decade developing economies such as China and India, as well as established
economies such as the United States, have had increased demand for energy to fuel growth and many
commercial opportunities to address energy related concerns have emerged. Some of the specific
trends over the past several years include:
|
|
|
Demand for natural gas is outpacing supply and resulting in higher prices and potential
interruptions in supply due to technological innovations related to natural gas combustion
(primarily for power generation).
|
|
|
|
|
Increased attention on air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
|
|
|
Higher energy price environments resulting from the absorption of excess petroleum
capacities.
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition by policy makers of national security issues related to reliance on
external energy sources.
|
Similar to the advances, such as increased efficiencies and reduced emissions, in natural gas
turbine technologies, emerging technologies that efficiently and cleanly convert coal into fuels
for power generation, chemical production and even transportation will experience rapid market
acceptance. With the expectation that those technical improvements should be achieved, coal has
become a larger part of the long-term supply plans for governments and major energy companies
worldwide.
19
In particular, within the Chinese and U.S. markets, coal gasification represents an
opportunity to improve air quality, economically capture greenhouse gas emissions and replace
energy imports from politically unstable sources with indigenous coal supplies. The United States
Department of Energy has stated that Chinese and U.S. coal reserves make up approximately 40% of
the global totals. China and the U.S. are also the largest importers of petroleum products. We
believe a significant commercial opportunity exists for companies that can successfully introduce
clean coal technologies, to utilize these indigenous coal fuel sources.
We have elected to make China a priority market since China offers immediate opportunities to
develop U-GAS
®
-based coal gasification projects and has a ready supply of low rank coal. According
to The World Bank, China is the worlds second largest and fastest growing energy market. They
estimate that over the next 25 years China will require two trillion dollars of investment in the
power sector alone, more than any other country or region. They believe growth in manufacturing
and the rise of Chinas middle class are driving this demand, and this demand is far outstripping
supply for electricity and other essential industrial commodities in China. The World Bank also
believes that despite a 15% growth in electricity production and 100 million additional tons of
coal mined in 2003, energy shortages in China will persist. Coal is Chinas most abundant,
indigenous energy resource and is in high demand, which in turn causes economic and environmental
pressures and forces the Chinese government and Chinese industries to re-think the way coal is
used. In order to meet the demand for clean energy and industrial commodities, China is in the
process of finding environmentally acceptable methods to convert coal into energy and chemical
commodities.
Our goal is to develop projects, technologies and systems to meet these needs and to establish
U-GAS
®
as a reliable and efficient alternative source of power, hydrogen and other gasification
products to manufacturers. The primary drivers for growth is a large indigenous coal supply,
heightened awareness of environmental issues, and a desire to develop a diversified energy mix and
mitigate over-reliance on natural gas and imported crude oil.
Targeted Customers
Chemical Plants, Petrochemical Plants and Refineries
. We believe that many chemical,
petrochemical plants and refineries are seeking a broad slate of products including electricity,
steam, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, oxygen, nitrogen and compressed air. We also believe U-GAS
®
gasification systems provide an ideal solution for these plants and refineries because inherent
integration opportunities allow these products to be produced with minimum additional capital
and/or operating costs. Moreover, because such plants tend to be run on a continuous basis, low
fuel cost is a key to economic competitiveness. General Electric and Shell have built multiple
IGCC power or chemical feedstock facilities for petrochemical and refinery facilities around the
world.
Large Manufacturers
. Many manufacturers require power, steam and hot water as part of their
production process. In addition, many industrial development zones are seeking co-generation
facilities specially dedicated to manufacturers in that zone that require power, steam and hot
water for industrial applications and for district heating and air conditioning. We believe that a
clean U-GAS
®
facility can provide the necessary energy and chemical operating feedstocks in areas
where scarcity or high prices of other energy sources make operations unprofitable.
Ammonia and Fertilizer Plants
. Ammonia and fertilizer plants require large amounts of
hydrogen, carbon monoxide, power and steam. We believe a significant opportunity exists for
conversion of these plants to U-GAS
®
since most of these plants purchase power from the grid and
produce their own syngas using old fixed bed gasification technology, which requires low ash and
high priced coal for fuel. We also believe that, due to the wide use of inefficient fixed bed
gasification systems, the vast majority of Chinas fertilizer plants will require replacement of
their entire gasification systems in the near future.
20
Alumina Refineries
. The production of alumina from bauxite requires a great deal of energy
that is currently being provided by natural gas or heavy fuel oil. The integration of a U-GAS
®
coal
gasification facility into an alumina refinery can lower the cost of production by reducing the raw
material costs for the energy required and increase the efficiency by which the refinery can
produce alumina. There are many alumina refineries in our target markets that are actively seeking
alternatives to their current high cost energy structure, which may include our U-GAS
®
technology.
Hydrogen Production
. Around the world, most hydrogen is produced from natural gas. With
increased natural gas prices, hydrogen production costs have risen dramatically. U-GAS
®
technology
can produce hydrogen at a cost which is much lower than the cost of hydrogen based on production
using natural gas as a feedstock. Increasingly heavy crude oils, as well as increased chemical
plant utilization, has driven the demand for hydrogen to unprecedented levels. Coal gasification
is a viable alternative for large scale production of hydrogen. We believe that the U-GAS
®
process
will allow us to take advantage of this expanding marketplace by being the low cost provider of
coal-derived hydrogen.
Coal-to-Liquids Plants
. Many countries desire to avoid their dependence on imported oil and
have taken steps to make coal-toliquid technology a viable energy alternative for transportation
fuels. Such plants will need large quantities of hydrogen, electricity, steam and oxygen, which we
believe can be provided by U-GAS
®
gasification plants. For example, two of Chinas largest coal
companies are developing large coal-to-liquids facilities. Coal companies typically have
substantial amounts of waste coal that are not adequately utilized. We believe the U-GAS
®
system
could allow such a mining company to convert negative value waste into low cost feedstocks for
these coal-to-liquid projects.
Integrated Projects
. Projects with the highest margins will be located at, or within a very
close distance to, opportunity fuels such as low-rank coals, lignites and other waste coals. Such
projects typically require multiple gasification commodities, such as power, steam, hydrogen,
carbon monoxide, and nitrogen, where an entire products value chain is integrated within one
complex. For example, where a methanol complex is established at a coal mine, the basic structure
of the project would be waste coal to power, steam, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, to methanol and then
sales to domestic and international markets.
Competition
We will seek to deploy U-GAS
®
plants in areas where the maximum integration of the process is
possible. In the world gasification market, the largest providers are General Electric, Shell,
Siemens and ConocoPhillips. Shells gasification efforts remain focused on the production of syngas
for chemical processes. Shell has recently announced a multi-million dollar contract to use its
gasification technology to produce hydrogen for a large coal-to-liquids project in China. There
are also several Chinese companies that utilize older, low pressure technologies, which utilize
high-cost coals and are relatively immature, with low capital costs being their primary competitive
advantage. In addition, there is a small Chinese coal gasification company that utilizes a low
pressure fluidized bed technology which may compete with our U-GAS
®
technology. The following
table depicts the U-GAS
®
process as compared to the other major coal gasification technologies.
21
In general, we believe that the primary competitive advantages of U-GAS® relative to the other
technologies are: (a) the potential for U-GAS® gasifiers to utilize low quality, low cost coals,
(b) the inherent flexibility of the U-GAS® technology allows a project to change fuels or utilize a
mix of fuels over the life of the project, and (c) the ability to economically build relatively
smaller plants. This ability to build plants that are economical at sizes required by many
industrial companies opens up a potentially large under served market. We believe that the lower
capital costs, shorter site preparation and construction time periods may allow us to build
projects where our larger competitors would be economically disadvantaged.
Current Projects
Our plan is to develop, finance, build, own and operate U-GAS® based coal gasification plants
ranging in size from 20 MWs (equivalent) to greater than 250 MWs (equivalent) and at costs ranging
from $20 million to several hundred million dollars. Our strategy is to sell the outputs of the
plants, which can be syngas, power, steam and other products (e.g. sulfur, ash) under long-term
contracts to industrial and wholesale customers. We may sell capacity in the plants outright or
under tolling agreements as a way to insulate the Company from commodity price volatility. We also
have the right to sublicense any U-GAS® system to customers for which we have constructed a U-GAS®
system.
For our first project, Synthesis Energy Systems Investments, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Synthesis Energy Holdings, Inc. (SES Investments), entered into a cooperative joint venture
contract with Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd. (Hai Hua) which established Synthesis
Energy Systems (Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. (the Joint Venture), a joint venture company that
has the primary purposes of (i) developing, constructing and operating a synthesis gas production
plant utilizing the U-GAS® technology in Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, China and (ii)
producing and selling syngas, steam and the various byproducts of the plant, including ash,
elemental sulphur, hydrogen and argon. Hai Hua is an independent producer of coke and coke oven
gas and owns a subsidiary engaged in methanol production. Hai Hua processes its coal in its own
coal washery prior to using such coal in its coke ovens. This coal washing process produces a
byproduct which is the design fuel for the Joint Ventures U-GAS® gasification plant. The
technology will enable syngas to be produced from Hai Huas coal sources and such syngas will be
used in Hai Huas methanol subsidiary, coke ovens and power plant. In exchange for their
respective ownership shares in the Joint Venture, SES Investments contributed approximately $9.1
million in capital, and Hai Hua contributed approximately $480,000 in cash, land use rights to a
parcel of land for construction of coal storage facilities and certain other
22
management services. The contribution of SES Investments is payable in installments, with
approximately $3,800,000 being contributed as of December 31, 2006.
By November of 2006, the project had obtained approval of its feasibility study, environmental
impact assessment and the Joint Venture was issued its business license. The groundbreaking for
the plant took place on December 5, 2006. We entered into the primary construction contract in
February 2007. Construction on the plant is expected to be completed in the second half of the
calendar year 2007 at a projected cost of $24.4 million. These costs were funded through: (i) $9.1
million equity contribution by SES Investments into the Joint Venture, (ii) $3.3 million
intercompany shareholder loan, and (iii) $12.0 million of bank debt. See Plan of Operations for
a summary of the terms of the two loans. The plant will be built on a site adjacent to the Hai Hua
coke and methanol facility. Hai Hua is obligated to grant rights of way for construction access
and other on-going operations of the plant. The land was purchased from the Chinese government
with the assistance of the Shandong Xue Cheng Economic Development Zone.
If either of SES Investments or Hai Hua desires to invest in another coal gasification project
within Zaozhuang City, the other company has a right to participate in up to 25% of the investment.
For the first twenty years, after the date that the plant becomes operational (the Operational
Date), 95% of all net profits of the Joint Venture will be distributed to SES Investments. After
the initial twenty years, the profit distribution percentages will be changed, with SES Investments
receiving 10% of the net profits of the Joint Venture and Hai Hua receiving 90% of the Joint
Ventures net profits. The contract has a term of fifty years, subject to earlier termination if
either SES Zaohuang files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent or if the syngas purchase contract
between the Joint Venture and Hai Hua (discussed in more detail below) is terminated. Hai Hua has
also agreed that the License Agreement is the sole property of SES Investments and its affiliated
entities and that it will not compete with SES Investments, or its affiliated entities, with
respect to fluidized bed gasification technology for the term of the Joint Venture.
In addition, Hai Hua has agreed to purchase, once the plant is completed, syngas from the
Joint Venture pursuant to the terms and conditions of a purchase and sale contract. Hai Hua will
(i) pay a monthly capacity fee and a monthly energy fee; (ii) provide piping to the plant for the
acceptance of steam and coke oven gas from Hai Hua and for the delivery of syngas from the Joint
Venture to Hai Hua; and (iii) coordinate its operations and maintenance so as to ensure Hai Hua
purchases as much syngas as possible. The energy fee is a per Ncum of syngas fee calculated by a
formula which factors in the monthly averages of the prices of design base coal, coke, coke oven
gas, power, steam and water, all of which are components used in the production of syngas. The
capacity fee is paid based on the capacity of the plant to produce syngas, factoring in the number
of hours (i) of production and (ii) of capability of production as compared to the guaranteed
capacity of the plant, which for purposes of the contract is 22,000 Ncum per hour of syngas.
The Joint Venture is required to procure any other necessary consumables for operation of the
plant, provided, however, the Joint Venture is entitled to reimbursement for these costs through
the payment of the energy fee. As part of its registered capital contribution to the Joint
Venture, Hai Hua shall, to the extent that it is required, contribute approximately $480,000 in
cash, provide up to 100,000 Ncum of coke oven gas and up to 600 tons of coke free to the Joint
Venture during the first year of operation as start-up fuels for the gasifiers. Any requirements
for coke or coke oven gas above these amounts shall be paid for by the Joint Venture. If Hai Hua
is unable or unwilling to provide the required coke or coke oven gas, the plant will be deemed to
be able to produce for purposes of calculating the capacity fee and Hai Hua will not be relieved of
its payment obligations. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, the value of the items provided by
Hai Hua to the Joint Venture (including the coke, coke oven gas, piping and acreage for the storage
facilities) shall not exceed 5% of the equity of the Joint Venture.
Hai Hua is required to annually provide to the Joint Venture a preliminary syngas usage plan
for that year, provided, however, that in no event shall the usage plan require less than 19,000,
or more than 22,000, Ncum per hour of syngas. In connection with this, the Joint Venture shall
annually provide a generation plan to Hai Hua which sets forth the anticipated syngas generation
for that year, and it shall
23
use its best efforts to match its generation plan with Hai Huas usage
plan. If the Joint Venture produces more syngas than the capacity that Hai Hua is required to
purchase under the contract, Hai Hua shall have a right of first refusal to purchase such excess
amount.
The syngas to be purchased by Hai Hua is subject to certain quality component requirements set
forth in the contract. All byproducts of the gasification process are the property of the Joint
Venture. The Joint Venture is entitled to provide services and sell products which it produces
other than syngas to third parties, but Hai Hua has a right of first refusal for any such sales.
Hai Hua is obligated to pay the capacity fee regardless of whether they use the gasification
capacity, subject only to availability of the plant and exceptions for certain events of force
majeure.
The agreement terminates twenty years from the Operational Date. Upon termination of the
agreement for any reason other than the expiration of the term, the Joint Venture will have the
right to either produce syngas for other customers in its current location or dismantle the plant
and move the plant to another location. Within two years of October 22, 2006, the date of the
contract, Hai Hua may request that the Joint Venture expand its syngas production in order to
assist in the production of methanol by a subsidiary of Hai Hua and the Joint Venture is required
to negotiate such increased production in good faith. Hai Hua has made such a request and as of
the date hereof, the Joint Venture is in negotiations regarding the details and pricing of the
expansion project.
In addition to the Joint Venture, we have also entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with
Golden Concord Holdings Ltd. for the construction of integrated coal gasification to methanol
(ultimately into liquid dimethyl ether (DME)) plant in Inner Mongolia. We are currently
negotiating various documents related to this project, including an agreement to form a joint
venture company, operations and management agreement for the plant, coal purchase agreements,
offtake agreements, and other related agreements, and the transaction remains subject to government
approval and approval by the board of directors of each company.
Research and Development
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we spent $373,282 and $87,954,
respectively, for research and development mainly related to the development and fuel testing of
coal as well as the development of engine generators using syngas as fuel. During the years ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 we spent $158,406 and $26,804 in engineering salaries, respectively. We
plan to continue increasing internal research and development with a goal of offering our customers
the best and most efficient clean coal solutions.
Governmental and Environmental Regulation
Our operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental
protection. Numerous governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
various Chinese authorities, issue regulations to implement and enforce such laws, which often
require difficult and costly compliance measures that carry substantial administrative, civil and
criminal penalties or may result in injunctive relief for failure to comply. These laws and
regulations may require the acquisition of a permit before operations at a facility commence,
restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various substances that can be released into
the environment in connection with such activities, limit or prohibit construction activities on
certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, ecologically sensitive and other protected areas,
and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations. We believe that we
are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations and we
have not experienced any material adverse effect from compliance with these environmental
requirements.
In China, developing and constructing gasification facilities is highly regulated. In the
development stage of a project, the key government approvals are of the projects environmental
impact
24
assessment report, feasibility study (also known as the project application report) and, in
the case of a Sino-foreign joint venture, approval of the joint venture companys joint venture
contract and articles of association. Approvals in China are required at the municipal, provincial
and/or central government levels depending on the total investment in the project.
Although we have been successful in obtaining the permits that are required at this stage of
the project, any retroactive change in regulations or an opinion that the approvals that have been
obtained are inadequate, either at the federal, provincial or state level, could require us to
obtain additional or new permits or spend considerable resources on complying with such
regulations. Other developments, such as the enactment of more stringent environmental laws and
regulations, could require us to incur significant capital expenditures.
Employees
As of May 1, 2007, we had
39 employees. None of our employees are represented by any
collective bargaining unit. We have not experienced any work stoppages, work slowdowns or other
labor unrest. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Our corporate office occupies approximately 3,000 square feet of leased office space in
Houston, Texas. We also lease approximately 3,500 square feet of office space in Shanghai, China
and we also lease small offices in Miami, Florida and Beijing, China. Over time, additional
facilities may be required as we add personnel to advance our commercial and technical efforts.
25
PLAN OF OPERATIONS
The following plan of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this registration statement. We are a
development stage enterprise and have not earned any operating revenue as of the date of this
filing. Our principal asset is our License Agreement. If we are successful in the use of this
license, our plants will provide our customers with molecular feedstocks (e.g. hydrogen, carbon
monoxide) or energy services (e.g. power, compression, steam) integrated with engine and/or turbine
generators for power and steam production. In connection with our molecular feedstock and energy
supply business, we may also provide certain additional services relating to U-GAS® installation
projects, including equipment procurement and supply services, technology licensing services,
technology and engineering development services, and operations and maintenance services.
Our core business plan includes:
|
|
|
Completing engineering and construction of plants as well as creating modular
gasification engineering blocks to speed the development of future U-GAS® based
projects.
|
|
|
|
|
Building relationships with multi-national industrial concerns to provide
U-GAS® solutions for their energy and chemical feedstock needs.
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding our experienced global engineering and project execution team to
complete the development of current projects as well as future projects under
development.
|
|
|
|
|
Protecting technology used and/or developed by the Company in the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office as well as similar agencies throughout the world.
|
Over the next twelve months, we are planning to develop relationships with energy and chemical
feedstock customers. We plan to develop multi-megawatt facilities from which syngas or power could
be sold into the wholesale energy and chemical markets. We intend to sell the outputs of the plant
which can be syngas, power, steam and other products (e.g. sulfur, ash) under long term contracts
to industrial and wholesale customers. In some cases, we may sell capacity in the plants outright
or under tolling agreement contracts with coal providers and customers to mitigate commodity price
risk. We will attempt to secure non-recourse debt financing in order to construct our plant
facilities. Such financing will be used on a project basis to reduce the amount of equity capital
required to complete the project.
For our first project, we established the Joint Venture for the primary purposes of (i)
developing, constructing and operating a synthesis gas production plant (Plant) utilizing the
U-GAS® technology in Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, China and (ii) producing and selling
syngas, steam and the various byproducts of the plant, including ash, elemental sulphur, hydrogen
and argon. In exchange for their respective ownership shares in the Joint Venture, SES Investments
agreed to contribute approximately $9.1 million in equity capital, and Hai Hua agreed to contribute
approximately $480,000 in cash, land use rights to a parcel of land for construction of coal
storage facilities and certain other management services.
In October of 2006, all necessary government approvals were received for the formation of the
Joint Venture. The groundbreaking on the Plant took place on December 5, 2006 and we entered into
the primary construction contract in February 2007. On March 22, 2007, we received a loan in the
amount of approximately $12 million from ICBC. Construction on the Plant is expected to be
completed in the second half of the calendar year 2007 at a projected cost of $24 million.
26
We have spent or plan to spend the following within the next twelve months:
|
|
|
Approximately $12.4 million related to construction of the Plant, which
includes a $9.1 million equity contribution by the Company and an intercompany loan by
Synthesis Energy Systems Investments Inc. (Synthesis Investments) to the Joint
Venture of approximately $3.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $2.2 million of operating costs.
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $800,000 of project development expenses.
|
On March 22, 2007 we received the proceeds from a bank loan pursuant to the terms of a Fixed
Assets Loan Contract with ICBC for approximately $12 million. These proceeds completed the project
funding needed for our Joint Venture to complete the Project. Key terms of the Fixed Assets Loan
Contract are as follows:
|
|
|
Term of the loan is 7 years from the commencement date (March 22, 2007) of the
loan.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest for the first year is 7.11% to be adjusted annually based upon the
standard rate announced each year by the Peoples Bank of China. Interest is payable
monthly on the 20
th
day of each month.
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments of approximately $1.0 million are due in March and September
of each year beginning on September 22, 2008 and end on March 21, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
Hai Hua is a guarantor on the loan.
|
|
|
|
|
The Project assets are pledged as collateral on the loan.
|
|
|
|
|
The Joint Venture agreed to covenants that, among other things, prohibit
pre-payment without the consent of ICBC and permit ICBC to be involved in the review
and inspection of the Project.
|
|
|
|
|
The loan is subject to customary events of default which, should one or more of
them occur and be continuing, would permit ICBC to declare all amounts owing under the
contract to be due and payable immediately.
|
Additionally, on March 20, 2007, the Joint Venture entered into and funded a Shareholders
Loan Agreement with Synthesis Investments for approximately $3.3 million (the Shareholder Loan).
The Shareholder Loan bears interest per annum at a rate of 6% and is due and payable on March 20,
2016. The shareholder Loan is unsecured and is subordinated to the above described ICBC loan, and
any other subsequent ICBC loans. The Joint Venture may not prepay the Shareholder Loan until the
ICBC loan is either paid in full or is fully replaced by another loan. Proceeds of the Shareholder
Loan may only be used for the purpose of developing, constructing, owning, operating and managing
the Project.
As of March 30, 2007, we had approximately $3 million of cash in our banks, in addition to
approximately $18.4 million of cash in the Joint Venture. Over the next twelve months, we also
plan to continue to advance the commercial development of U-GAS
®
based projects in China and
selected locations in the United States, and to further expand our global engineering and project
execution team to complete future projects which are currently contemplated. We currently expect
that we have sufficient funds to implement these strategies in furtherance of our business plan
during the next twelve months. In the next few months, we plan to raise approximately $25 million
to $50 million through debt or equity financing in order to implement strategies in furtherance of
our business development and expansion. We intend to rely on commercial banks to finance or
refinance some portion of our future project costs. We
27
may also offer debt or equity securities to
fulfill our other cash requirements. See also Risk Factors We may require additional funding . . . on page 2 for more information.
We do not have any off balance sheet financial arrangements.
28
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the selling stockholders.
Assuming that the selling stockholders offer all of their shares of our common stock, the selling
stockholders will not have any beneficial ownership except as otherwise provided in the table
below. The shares are being registered to permit the selling stockholders to sell or otherwise
dispose of the shares covered hereby, or interests therein, from time to time. We will file a
prospectus supplement to name successors to any named selling shareholders who are able to use the
prospectus to resell the shares. Such prospectus supplement would be required to be delivered,
together with this prospectus, to any purchaser of such shares. See Plan of Distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Owned
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
and to be Owned Prior to
|
|
Shares Being
|
|
Owned After
|
|
Shares Owned
|
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Offering(1)
|
|
Offered(1)
|
|
Offering(2)
|
|
After Offering(2)
|
Alfredo Aguayo
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorena Amez
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shawn Andrew
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATC Trustees
(Bahamas) Ltd. as trustee for trusts for the benefit of Kevin and Paolo Cammarata(3)(4)
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evangelina Balderas
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ross Baldur
|
|
|
21,365
|
|
|
|
21,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nelson Barker
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack Barr
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Barr
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick D. Barr
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry D. Bast
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann Beals
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathryn Marie Beeler
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert James Beeler
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Blynder
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas G. Bongard (3)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand Equity LLC (11)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard & Judy Butnick
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charmian Byers-Jones
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank J. Cadwell (3)
|
|
|
66,668
|
|
|
|
66,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ira Ronald Cadwell (3)
|
|
|
66,666
|
|
|
|
66,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Cadwell (3)
|
|
|
66,666
|
|
|
|
66,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Owned
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
and to be Owned Prior to
|
|
Shares Being
|
|
Owned After
|
|
Shares Owned
|
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Offering(1)
|
|
Offered(1)
|
|
Offering(2)
|
|
After Offering(2)
|
Gil Castillo
|
|
|
30,219
|
|
|
|
30,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dylan L. Clayton
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ira Cohen
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin A. Cooper
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorinda S. Crowley
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Curran
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc L. Danny
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam M. Dernbach (3)
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Alan Dernbach (3)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy A. Dernbach (5)
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaston Dupre
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Dwyer
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Erichsen
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Ferber (12)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casey H. Ferguson
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Ferguson
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lori Ficarra
|
|
|
10,530
|
|
|
|
10,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene Gannon
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarence J. Gdowski
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Gilliland
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore & Eve Golfinopoulos (3)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc & Jodi Gold
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory B. Golden
|
|
|
3,030,100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3,030,000
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander E. Gomez (13)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeanine Goodstein
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clifford Grossman
|
|
|
35,800
|
|
|
|
35,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn Grossman
|
|
|
33,500
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Grossman
|
|
|
30,900
|
|
|
|
30,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Owned
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
and to be Owned Prior to
|
|
Shares Being
|
|
Owned After
|
|
Shares Owned
|
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Offering(1)
|
|
Offered(1)
|
|
Offering(2)
|
|
After Offering(2)
|
Robert P. Grossman
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eitan M. Guerrero
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James D. Hanson, Jr. (5)
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Harrington
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ronald Hartman
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan Harpsky
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanjay Kumar
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabelle Lau
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernice Lerner
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MD Investments Limited (3)(8)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francisco Lazaro Lopez
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Michel, Jr. (3)
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodolfo Milani
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joan Misuraca
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrique Neufeld
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony Palazzo
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark H. & Valarie Pearl
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall J. Peacon
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Perkins
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Puccio (3)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amul Purohit
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cal & Dorene Remy
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Michael Rizzotti
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Rogatz
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quincy Sanchez
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Isabel Schwedel
|
|
|
49,791
|
|
|
|
49,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Schwedel (3)
|
|
|
1,142,160
|
(6)
|
|
|
936,960
|
|
|
|
205,200
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renee Schwedel (3)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Owned
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
and to be Owned Prior to
|
|
Shares Being
|
|
Owned After
|
|
Shares Owned
|
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Offering(1)
|
|
Offered(1)
|
|
Offering(2)
|
|
After Offering(2)
|
Robert M. Schwedel
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Schwedel
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale A. Schwieger (14)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Sides
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silo Investments Limited (3)(9)
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darrel F. Slaughter
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chad A. Sorg
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey F. Smith
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard Dane Stein
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael G. Storey (3)
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adonna Thayer
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Tublin (5)
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Mark Turner
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua Vajda
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elke Weintraub
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet M. Wichman
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travis & Edith Wichman (5)
|
|
|
114,134
|
|
|
|
114,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zahaca Enterprises USA LLC (3)(10)
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
2,976,938
|
|
|
|
2,976,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than one percent, based on 28,183,715 shares outstanding as May 1, 2007.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Assumes the sale of all of the shares offered hereby to persons who are not affiliates of the
selling stockholders.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Each of these selling stockholders acquired the shares offered hereby on a private placement
in May of 2005. Each selling stockholder purchased the shares offered hereby for their own
account and not with a view toward distribution.
|
|
(4)
|
|
ATC Trustees (Bahamas) Ltd. serves as the trustee of trusts for the benefit of Kevin
and
Paolo Cammarata and exercises voting and investment authority over such shares. Peter A.
Goddard, in his capacity as Director and Secretary, is an authorized representative of ATC
Trustees (Bahamas) Ltd.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Each of these selling stockholders (i) acquired the shares offered hereby in private
placement in May of 2005, and (ii) holds shares included in the 6,000,000 shares eligible for
trading on the Pink Sheets described in Footnote 10. Each selling stockholder purchased the
shares offered hereby for their own account and not with a view toward distribution.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 205,200 shares held by the David A. Schwedel Living Trust, of which Mr. Schwedel is
the beneficial owner.
|
32
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are currently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Mark Daeche, the Director of MD Investments Limited, exercises voting and investment
authority over the shares held by this selling stockholder.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Marc Citron, the Director of Silo Investments Limited, exercises voting and investment
authority over the shares held by this selling stockholder.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Marc A. Pearl, Managing Partner of Zahaca Enterprises USA LLC, exercises voting and
investment authority over the shares held by the selling stockholder.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Jason Burger and Robert Gleason, Managers of Brand Equity LLC, exercise voting and
investment authority over the shares held by this selling stockholder.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Mr. Ferber was the Treasurer and a director of Tamborine at the time of the merger with
Synthesis Florida.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Mr. Gomez was the Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary and a director of
Tamborine at the time of the merger with Synthesis Florida.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Mr. Schwieger was the Assistant Secretary and a director at the time of the merger with
Synthesis Florida
|
|
(15)
|
|
We also plan to include 2,892,361 shares of stock which are eligible for trading on the Pink
Sheets. We will include the additional names of the selling stockholders in an amendment to
this registration statement.
|
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale or other disposition of the shares
covered hereby, or interests therein, by the selling stockholders.
33
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The selling stockholders, which as used herein includes donees, pledgees, transferees or other
successors-in-interest selling shares of common stock or interests in shares of common stock
received after the date of this prospectus from a selling stockholder as a gift, pledge,
partnership distribution or other transfer, may, from time to time, sell, transfer or otherwise
dispose of any or all of their shares of common stock or interests in shares of common stock on any
stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private
transactions. These dispositions may be at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time
of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price, at varying prices determined at the time
of sale, or at negotiated prices. Because there is no trading market in our common stock as of the
date of this prospectus, the selling stockholders will sell any shares in the public market at
prices ranging from $5.75 to $7.75 per share until a public market develops for the common stock.
Once a public market develops for the common stock, the selling stockholders may sell their shares
of common stock in the public market based on the market price at the time of sale or at negotiated
prices.
Subject to the foregoing, the selling stockholders may use any one or more of the following
methods when disposing of shares or interests therein:
|
|
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer
solicits purchasers;
|
|
|
|
|
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as
agent, but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate
the transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
|
|
|
|
|
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
|
|
|
|
|
privately negotiated transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
short sales effected after the date the registration statement, of which this
prospectus is a part, is declared effective by the SEC;
|
|
|
|
|
through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions,
whether through an options exchange or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
|
broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified
number of such shares at a stipulated price per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
a combination of any such methods of sale.
|
The selling stockholders may, from time to time, pledge or grant a security interest in some
or all of the shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their
secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock,
from time to time, under this prospectus, or under an amendment to this prospectus under Rule
424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending the list of selling
stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling
stockholders under this prospectus. The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of
common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in
interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus. We will file a
prospectus supplement to name successors to any named selling shareholders who are able to use the
prospectus to resell the shares. Such prospectus supplement would be required to be delivered,
together with this prospectus, to any purchaser of such shares.
34
In connection with the sale of our common stock or interests therein, the selling stockholders
may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may
in turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging the positions they
assume. The selling stockholders may also sell shares of our common stock short and deliver these
securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the common stock to broker-dealers
that in turn may sell these securities. The selling stockholders may also enter into option or
other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or
more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial
institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other
financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect
such transaction).
The aggregate proceeds to the selling stockholders from the sale of the common stock offered
by them will be the purchase price of the common stock less discounts or commissions, if any. Each
of the selling stockholders reserves the right to accept and, together with their agents from time
to time, to reject, in whole or in part, any proposed purchase of common stock to be made directly
or through agents. We will not receive any of the proceeds from this offering.
Certain of the selling stockholders also may resell all or a portion of the shares in open
market transactions in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act, provided that they meet the
criteria and conform to the requirements of that rule. However, Tamborines promoters or their
affiliates and their transferees, within the meaning of the Securities Act, both before and
after the Merger (as described in BusinessGeneral), are deemed to be underwriters within the
meaning of the Securities Act. Any commissions or discounts given to any such broker-dealer may be
regarded as underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. As such, regardless of
technical compliance with Rule 144 under the Act, because Tamborine was a shell company prior to
the Merger, Rule 144 will be unavailable to its promoters and affiliates and their transferees.
The other selling stockholders and any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents that participate
in the sale of the common stock or interests therein may be underwriters within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. Any discounts, commissions, concessions or profit they earn
on any resale of the shares may be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
Selling stockholders who are underwriters within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities
Act will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.
To the extent required, the shares of our common stock to be sold, the names of the selling
stockholders, the respective purchase prices and public offering prices, the names of any agents,
dealer or underwriter, any applicable commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer
will be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if appropriate, a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement that includes this prospectus.
In order to comply with the securities laws of some states, if applicable, the common stock
may be sold in these jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In
addition, in some states the common stock may not be sold unless it has been registered or
qualified for sale or an exemption from registration or qualification requirements is available and
is complied with.
We intend to advise the selling stockholders that the anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M
under the Exchange Act may apply to sales of shares in the market and to the activities of the
selling stockholders and their affiliates. In addition, to the extent applicable we will make
copies of this prospectus (as it may be supplemented or amended from time to time) available to the
selling stockholders for the purpose of satisfying the prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act. The selling stockholders may indemnify any broker-dealer that participates in
transactions involving the sale of the shares against certain liabilities, including liabilities
arising under the Securities Act.
35
The selling stockholders will not engage in any short sale of the securities offered by it
pursuant to this prospectus until the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part has
been declared effective by the SEC.
We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act and state securities laws, relating to the registration of the
shares offered by this prospectus.
We have agreed with the selling stockholders to keep the registration statement of which this
prospectus constitutes a part effective until the earlier of (1) such time as all of the shares
covered by this prospectus have been disposed of pursuant to and in accordance with the
registration statement or (2) the date on which the shares may be sold pursuant to Rule 144(k) of
the Securities Act.
36
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information concerning our directors, executive officers and
key employees as of May 1, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Lorenzo Lamadrid
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Timothy Vail
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
David Eichinger
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
President of Corporate Development
|
Donald Bunnell
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer Asia
Pacific and Director
|
Gregory (Bruce) Golden
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chief Technologist
|
Carol Pearson
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary
|
Michael Storey
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Denis Slavich
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Director
|
Harry Rubin
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
Lorenzo Lamadrid
. Mr. Lamadrid has been our Chairman since April of 2005. Since 2001, Mr.
Lamadrid has also served as Chairman and Chief Executive of Globe Development Group, LLC, a firm
specializing in international energy advisory, investment, and development of major energy and
power projects. He is also a Managing Director and Founding Partner of the Worldwide Power Group,
Ltd., a developer of large-scale energy and power generation projects in Asia and Latin America,
and is also a member of the International Advisory Board and the Executive Committee of Sirocco
Aerospace International, a marketer of aerospace products. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Lamadrid was
President and Chief Executive Officer of Arthur D. Little, Inc., a global management consulting
firm. Prior to joining Arthur D. Little, from 1996 to 1999, Mr. Lamadrid was President of Western
Resources International, Inc., a subsidiary of Western Resources, Inc., and Managing Director of
The Wing Group, a subsidiary of Western Resources that develops large-scale international electric
power projects. Prior to that, Mr. Lamadrid spent seven years with General Electric, the last two
as a Corporate Officer. He served as Vice President and General Manager of GE Aerospace, where he
was responsible for international operations, domestic marketing and business development
activities, and strategy development for the overall Aerospace Group. While at General Electric,
Mr. Lamadrid also served as Corporate Staff Executive for strategic planning and business
development. Mr. Lamadrid also served on the Board of Directors of the General Electric Trading
Company, GE/RCA Licensing Operation, Toshiba Electronic Systems Company (Japan), Ltd., and the
Philadelphia World Affairs Council. Before joining General Electric, Mr. Lamadrid was a Manager at
The Boston Consulting Group, and was also a founding investor of the Boston Beer Company. Mr.
Lamadrid graduated from Yale University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Administrative
Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a M.S. in Chemical Engineering, and Harvard
with an M.B.A.
Timothy Vail.
Mr. Vail is our President and Chief Executive Officer and is also a Director.
Mr. Vail joined us as a Director on September 20, 2005, and accepted the President and Chief
Executive Officer position on May 30, 2006. Prior to joining us, beginning in 2002, Mr. Vail
served as the Director of Commercialization for Fuel Cell Development for General Motors
Corporation (GM). At GM, Mr. Vails duties included the development of GMs Shanghai fuel cell
office as well as coordination of engineering facilities in the US, Germany, Japan and China. Prior
to his position at GM, Mr. Vail was the Vice President of product development for The New Power
Company, a start-up subsidiary of Enron Corporation, where he was responsible for the development
of new products and services to be delivered to New Powers customer bases. From 1995 until
starting work for The New Power Company, Mr. Vail was a Vice President at Enron Energy Services.
Mr. Vail was also a securities lawyer with Andrews
37
Kurth, LLP from 1990 to 1993. Mr. Vail holds a
J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center and a B.A. in Economics from The University of Texas
at Austin.
David Eichinger.
Mr. Eichinger has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
President of Corporate Development, since May 30, 2006. Prior to joining us as an executive
officer, Mr. Eichinger was a consultant to us since November 1, 2005, in which capacity he advised
us on technology license negotiations and global expansion beyond the Chinese market. From 1991
to 1996, Mr. Eichinger spent five years in the Corporate Treasury function as an analyst in
Corporate Finance and Tax at Exxon Corporation and Exxon Chemicals. From 1996 to 2000, Mr.
Eichinger led merger and acquisition teams for Enron Corporation in the deregulating wholesale and
retail markets in North and South America. In addition, Mr. Eichinger led the spin off of The New
Power Company and served as an executive officer in charge of corporate development. Mr. Eichinger
has also advised a number of energy related firms including CAM Energy (a New York based hedge
fund) and General Hydrogen. Mr. Eichinger holds both a B.S. and M.S. in Chemistry from The College
of William and Mary, and an M.B.A. from Carnegie Mellon.
Donald Bunnell
. Mr. Bunnell is our President and Chief Executive Officer Asia Pacific, a
Director and a co-founder of our company. From 2001 until the creation of our company, Mr. Bunnell
was the Asia Business Development Vice President for BHP Billitons aluminum group. Between 1997
and 2001, Mr. Bunnell served in various capacities, including Vice President in charge of Enron
Chinas power group, and Country Manager, with the power development team of Enron Corporation.
During this time, Mr. Bunnell spent three years leading the Enron/Messer/Texaco consortium for the
Nanjing BASF Project. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Bunnell was a manager with Coastal Power Corporation
(now part of El Paso Corporation) in Beijing, where he was involved in development of gas turbine
power plants and other power projects. Mr. Bunnell is an attorney licensed to practice in the
United States and has practiced law in Hong Kong, advising clients on China investments, prior to
entering the power business. Mr. Bunnell is fluent in Mandarin Chinese, has lived in China for
over 11 years, and has 10 years of experience in the China power industry developing projects and
managing joint ventures. Mr. Bunnell graduated from Miami University with a B.A. and from the
William & Mary School of Law with a J.D.
Gregory Bruce Golden
. Mr. Golden is our Chief Technologist and a co-founder of the Company.
Mr. Golden has 30 years of experience in the power industry developing, designing, building and
operating power plants, including experience with IGCC power and utility plants. Mr. Golden worked
for Enron Corporation from 1991 through 2001. From March to November 2001, Mr. Golden led Enron
Corporations technical definition and estimate phase of a solid fuel power generation initiative.
This solid fuel initiative helped Mr. Golden to better understand the competitiveness of IGCC power
utility plants and led him to the U-GAS
®
technology. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Golden led several
technical proposal teams for inside-the-fence utility supply facilities and was also general
manager of development engineering responsible for technical support for the development of several
large power plants in China. From March 1994 to June 1996, Mr. Golden managed the construction of
a 150 MW combined cycle gas turbine power plant in Hainan, China. Mr. Golden also assumed
responsibility during this period for the review and oversight of a 550 MW poly-generation facility
for the Saras Oil Refinery in Italy. When Mr. Golden joined Enron in 1991, he initially managed
the development and construction of power plants in Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and
Honduras. Of Mr. Goldens 30 years in the power industry, he has spent most of the past 10 years
developing and building power and poly-generation plants. Mr. Golden graduated from Rice
University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering.
38
Carol Pearson
. Ms. Pearson has served as our Corporate Controller since July 27, 2006 and as
our Corporate Secretary since October 11, 2006. From October 2005 to July 2006, she served as
Corporate Controller for Cornell Companies Inc. Prior to that, Ms. Pearson served as Director of
Internal Audit at Camden Property Trust, Inc. from May 2004 through August 2005. From January 2001
through May 2004, she was in charge of Financial Reporting and Compliance for EGL, Inc. Ms.
Pearson previously served as an audit manager with Ernst & Young, LLP and a senior accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand, LLP. She graduated from Northeast Louisiana University with a B.B.A. in
accounting with Honors and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Michael Storey.
Mr. Storey has served as one of our directors since November of 2005. From
2000 to 2004, he has served as President and CEO of Inmarsat Ventures, a global communications
company. He resigned in March of 2004, but continues as an advisor. From 1993 to 1999, Mr. Storey
ran several telecommunications businesses during European deregulation that became MCI Europe and
is now Verizon Communications. In 1984, Mr. Storey established City Centre Communications, a
business in the cable television and telecommunications industry. He grew his business and acquired
several franchises before selling his interests in 1992 to Videotron and Bell Canada. He served as
a Director and then Chairman of the Cable Communications Association from 1983 to 1990,
representing all the investors in the U.K. cable industry. Starting in 1972, Mr. Storey served for
10 years as a Vice President and Partner of Booze Allen Hamilton International Management
Consultants. Mr. Storey is a graduate of Kings Fund Administrative Staff College and has an
M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. From 1958 to 1968, he worked in the healthcare industry,
operating hospitals in the U.K., Middle East, and North America. He also holds two professional
certifications: Professionally Qualified Hospital Administrator and Professionally Qualified
Personnel Manager.
Denis Slavich.
Mr. Slavich has served as a director since November of 2005 and currently
serves as the Chairman of our Audit Committee. Mr. Slavich has over 35 years of experience in
large-scale power generation development. He is currently an international consultant to a number
of U.S. and China-based companies engaged in cross border transactions, as well as an advisor and
board member for a number of additional firms. From 1998 to 2000 Mr. Slavich was the CFO and
director of KMR Power Corporation and was responsible for the development of an international IPP
company that developed projects in Columbia as well as other areas. Mr. Slavich also served as
acting President for Kellogg Development Corporation, a division of M.W. Kellogg, during 1997.
From 1991 to 1995, Mr. Slavich was also a Vice President of Marketing for Flour Daniel. From 1971
to 1991 Mr. Slavich served in various executive positions at Bechtel Corporation including Sr. VP,
CFO, and director and Sr. VP and manager of the International Power Division. Mr. Slavich received
his Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, M.B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh and
his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley.
Harry Rubin.
Mr. Rubin has been a Director since August 5, 2006. Mr. Rubin is currently
Chairman of Henmead Enterprises, in which capacity he advises various companies regarding strategy,
acquisitions and divestitures. He currently serves as a Director of Image-Metrics Plc, and has held
board positions at a number of private and public companies such as the A&E Network, RCA/Columbia
Pictures Home Video and the Genisco Technology Corporation. He was a founding partner of the Boston
Beer Company. In the 12 years prior to 2006, Mr. Rubin held various senior management roles in the
computer software industry, including Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
of Atari, and President of International Operations and Chief Financial Officer for GT Interactive
Software. Mr. Rubin entered the computer software business in 1993 when he became Executive VP
for GT Interactive Software as a start-up company, and played a leadership role in GTs progression
as the company went public in 1995 and became one of the largest industry players. Prior to 1993,
he held various senior financial and general management positions at RCA, GE and NBC. He is a
graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Business School, and resides in New York City.
39
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Companys Board of Directors (the Board) has six directors and has established the
Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees as its standing committees. The Board
does not have an executive committee or any committees performing a similar function. We are not
currently listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system that has
requirements that a majority of the board of directors be independent, however, we have applied for
a listing with the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. which has requirements that a majority of the board of
directors be independent. The Board has determined that all members of the Board, other than
Lorenzo Lamadrid, Chairman of the Board, Timothy Vail, the Companys President and Chief Executive
Officer and Donald Bunnell, President and Chief Executive Officer Asia Pacific, are independent
under the definition set forth in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc., which is
the definition that the Board has chosen to use for the purposes of the determining independence,
as the Pink Sheets does not provide such a definition. Therefore, only half of the Companys
current Board members are independent. The Company is utilizing the phase-in provisions of the
NASDAQ rules for the majority independent requirement, which permits the Company to be listed if it
has a majority of independent members within twelve months of the date of listing. The Board plans
to appoint at least one more independent director as soon as practicable within this one-year
period. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Companys Audit
Committee, in addition to meeting the above standards, also meet the criteria for independence for
audit committee members which are set out in the Exchange Act.
40
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our
common stock as of May 1, 2007, by:
|
|
|
each person who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding class
of our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
|
each member of the Board;
|
|
|
|
|
each of our executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. To our knowledge,
each of the holders of capital stock listed below has sole voting and investment power as to the
capital stock owned unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numbers of Shares of Common
|
|
% of Common Stock
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
Outstanding
(1)
|
Donald Bunnell
|
|
|
6,102,500
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
Lorenzo Lamadrid (2)
|
|
|
3,195,000
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Gregory Bruce Golden
|
|
|
3,030,100
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Azure International (3)
|
|
|
1,680,000
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Michael Storey (4)
|
|
|
1,480,000
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Timothy Vail (5)
|
|
|
1,185,000
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
David Eichinger (6)
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Denis Slavich (7)
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Harry Rubin (8)
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
15,917,600
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1%
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on 28,183,715 shares outstanding as of May 1, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Christopher J. Raczkowski, Stephen M. Terry and Juanli Han are the principals of, and
exercise voting and investment authority over the shares held by, this stockholder.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 80,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 965,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 700,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 105,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days hereof.
|
41
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
. The following table provides information concerning compensation
paid or accrued during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 to our principal executive
officer and each of our other two most highly paid executive officers whose salary and bonus
exceeded $100,000, collectively referred to as the Named Executive Officers, determined at the end
of the last fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Timothy Vail,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,219,478
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,231,987
|
|
President and CEO
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Eichinger, CFO
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,936,891
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,573
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
5,993,464
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Bunnell,
President and CEO
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Prior to May 30, 2006, Mr. Vail served only as a director, for which he did not receive any
cash compensation.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Time vested options. Value determined using a Black-Sholes model. See Note 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of assumptions made in the valuation of
option grants.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Prior to May 30, 2006, Mr. Eichinger served as a consultant to the Company. His compensation
for these services is listed under All Other Compensation.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Represents amounts paid under a consulting agreement between the Company and Mr. Eichinger
which was effective from October 19, 2005 through May 1, 2006. Mr. Eichinger was hired by the
Company as an employee on a permanent basis effective May 30, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Mr. Bunnell was one of the Companys founders and received 7,402,500 shares in exchange for
his work for the Company and his initial capital contribution of $100,000 subsequent to our
merger with Tamborine on April 18, 2005.
|
We have entered into employment agreements with Timothy Vail, as our President and Chief
Executive Officer, David Eichinger, as our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of
Corporate Development and Donald Bunnell, as our President and Chief Executive Officer Asia
Pacific.
Our agreement with Mr. Vail became effective May 30, 2006 and is for a four-year term. He
receives an annual base salary of up to $180,000, bonuses as may be awarded from time to time by
the Board or any compensation committee thereof, including a performance bonus, and reimbursement
of no more than $1,500 per month for all reasonable and customary medical and health insurance
premiums incurred by Mr. Vail if he is not covered by insurance. Mr. Vails salary as of June 30,
2006 was $10,000 per month and was subject to increase upon the achievement of certain performance
milestones. Mr. Vail met two of these milestones, one in August of 2006 and his salary was
increased to $12,500 per month, and the second in March of 2007 and his salary was increased to
$15,000 per month. The compensation committee of the Board shall also evaluate Mr. Vails salary
on an annual basis and determine if any additional increases are warranted. Pursuant to the terms
of the employment agreement, we have also granted Mr. Vail options to purchase 2,350,000 shares of
common stock. The options have an exercise price of $3.00 and vest in five equal annual
installments, with the first installment vesting on the effective date of the employment agreement.
The options are subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the Companys Amended and Restated
2005 Incentive Plan (the Plan). If the employment agreement is terminated by us other than by
reason of death, disability or cause, we will continue to pay Mr. Vail his
42
salary for the remaining
term of the employment agreement, but in no event less than 6 months and all options shall
automatically vest. All vested options must be exercised within six months of the termination
date, regardless of the reason for termination. The employment agreement prohibits Mr. Vail from
competing with us during his employment and for a period of 18 months after termination of his
employment. In addition, all options shall automatically vest upon a change of control, as such
term is defined in the employment agreement.
Mr. Vail was also granted an option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the
terms of a nonstatutory stock option agreement dated effective November 7, 2005. The option has an
exercise price of $2.50 and vest in four equal annual installments, with the first installment
vesting on the effective date of the grant. The option expires on November 7, 2010. The option is
subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the Plan. In addition, the option shall
automatically vest upon a change of control, as such term is defined in the grant agreement.
Our agreement with Mr. Eichinger became effective May 30, 2006 and is for a four-year term.
He receives an annual base salary of up to $180,000, bonuses as may be awarded from time to time by
the Board or any compensation committee thereof, including a performance bonus, and reimbursement
of no more than $1,500 per month for all reasonable and customary medical and health insurance
premiums incurred by Mr. Eichinger if he is not covered by insurance. Mr. Eichingers current
salary is $15,000 per month and is subject to increase upon the achievement of certain performance
milestones. The compensation committee of the Board shall also evaluate Mr. Eichingers salary on
an annual basis and determine if any additional increases are warranted. We have also granted Mr.
Eichinger options to purchase 1,750,000 shares of common stock. The options have an exercise price
of $3.00 and vest in five equal annual installments, with the first installment vesting on the date
of the option grant. The options are subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the Plan. If
the employment agreement is terminated by us other than by reason of death, disability or cause, we
will continue to pay Mr. Eichinger his salary for the remaining term of the employment agreement,
but in no event less than 6 months and all options shall automatically vest. All vested options
must be exercised within six months of the termination date, regardless of the reason for
termination. The employment agreement prohibits Mr. Eichinger from competing with us during his
employment and for a period of 18 months after termination of his employment. In addition, all
options shall automatically vest upon a change of control, as such term is defined in the
employment agreement.
Our agreement with Mr. Bunnell was amended and restated effective July 14, 2006 and is for a
term ending on April 18, 2009. Mr. Bunnell receives an annual base salary of $120,000, bonuses as
may be awarded from time to time by the Board or any compensation committee thereof, including a
performance bonus, and reimbursement of no more than $1,500 per month for all reasonable and
customary medical and health insurance premiums incurred by Mr. Bunnell if he is not covered by
insurance. Mr. Bunnells salary is subject to increase upon the achievement of certain performance
milestones. The compensation committee of the Board shall also evaluate Mr. Bunnells salary on an
annual basis and determine if any additional increases are warranted. If the employment agreement
is terminated by us other than by reason of death, disability or cause, we will continue to pay Mr.
Bunnell his salary for the remaining term of the employment agreement, but in no event less than 6
months and all options shall automatically vest. All vested options must be exercised within six
months of the termination date, regardless of the reason for termination. The employment agreement
prohibits Mr. Bunnell from competing with us during his employment and for a period of 18 months
after termination of his employment.
43
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Equity
incentive
Plan Awards
Market
or
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Number
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Value of
|
|
of
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
of
|
|
of
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
Units of
|
|
Shares,
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Units or
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Not
|
|
Not
|
|
That Have
|
|
Not
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Vested
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
|
(i)
|
|
(j)
|
Timothy Vail
|
|
|
482,500
|
|
|
|
1,917,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Eichinger
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Bunnell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Vail has received two option grants: (a) an option to purchase 50,000 shares at an
exercise price of $2.50 on November 7, 2005, and (b) an option to purchase 2,350,000 shares at
an exercise price of $3.00 on May 30, 2006. The options expire on November 7, 2010 and May
30, 2011, respectively. The November 7, 2005 option vests in four equal annual installments,
with the first installment vesting on the date of grant. The May 30, 2006 option vests in
five equal annual installments, with the first installment vesting on the date of grant.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Eichinger received an option to purchase 1,750,000 shares on May 30, 2006 which vests in
five equal annual installments, with the first installment vesting on the date of grant. The
option expires on May 30, 2011.
|
The description of the terms of the employment agreements of Messrs. Vail and Eichinger
also includes a summary description of the terms of their May 30, 2006 option grants.
44
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
Lorenzo Lamadrid
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
212,317
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
272,317
|
|
Michael Storey
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
770,437
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
770,437
|
|
Denis Slavich
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
770,437
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
770,437
|
|
Harry Rubin
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Lamadrid was granted an option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $2.50 on November 7, 2005. The option vests in four equal annual installments, with
the first installment vesting on the date of grant. The option expires on November 7, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Each of Mr. Storey and Mr. Slavich were granted (i) an option to purchase 50,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share on November 7, 2005 and (ii) an option to
purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share on May 30,
2006. The options vest in four and five equal annual installments, respectively, with the
first installment vesting on the date of grant. The options expire on November 7, 2010 and
May 30, 2011, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Mr. Rubin began serving as a director on August 4, 2006. On that date, he was granted an
option to purchase 160,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share.
The option vests in five equal annual installments, with the first installment vesting on the
date of grant. The option expires on August 4, 2011. Additionally, on March 26, 2007, Mr.
Rubin was granted an option to purchase an additional 40,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $6.00 per share. The option vests in five equal annual installments, with
the first installment vesting on the date of the grant. The option expires on February 7,
2010.
|
Mr. Lamadrid has a consulting agreement with us for his service as Chairman of our Board.
The agreement is for a four-year term effective August 1, 2006. Mr. Lamadrid receives an annual
consulting fee of $60,000 and reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of
his services. The compensation committee of the Board shall also evaluate Mr. Lamadrids
consulting fee on an annual basis and determine if any additional increases are warranted.
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
None.
45
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock has been quoted on the Pink Sheets since March 23, 2005. On May 23, 2005, we
changed our symbol on the Pink Sheets from TMBH to SYMX and our common stock is currently
trading on the Pink Sheets under that symbol.
The following table sets forth the range of the high and low closing prices, as reported by
the Pink Sheets, for our common stock for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
Year Ending June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter (beginning March 23, 2005)
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
5.75
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.75
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.75
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter (as of April 27, 2007)
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock. As of May
1, 2007, 28,183,715 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. As of such date, there
were approximately 200 holders of record of our common stock.
We have not paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in
the immediate future as we contemplate that our cash flows will be used for continued growth of our
operations. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors
in light of conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition, capital
requirements, and restrictions in financing agreements, business conditions and other factors.
46
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value
per share, of which 28,183,715 shares of our common stock are issued and outstanding as of May 1,
2007. All of our outstanding shares of common stock are duly authorized, validly issued and
outstanding and fully paid and non-assessable.
Common Stock
Voting
. The holders of our common stock have one vote for each share they hold on all matters
presented to them and do not have cumulative voting rights.
Dividends
. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends equally, if any, as
may be declared by the Board out of funds legally available therefore after taking into account
various factors, including, among others, our financial condition, results of operations, cash
flows from operations, current and anticipated capital requirements and expansion plans.
Liquidation
. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of our common stock
will be entitled to a ratable portion (based upon the number of shares of our common stock held by
each such holder or issuable upon the exercise of any securities convertible in shares of our
common stock) of our available net assets.
Preemptive Rights
. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption,
or conversion rights.
Transfer Restrictions
. Holders of our common stock may only transfer, sell or otherwise
dispose of our common stock held pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act, pursuant to an available exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act or Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act. In connection with any transfer,
sale or disposition of any of our common stock other than pursuant to an effective registration
statement or Rule 144, we may require you to provide us a written opinion of counsel providing that
such transfer, sale or disposition does not require registration under the Securities Act.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of Our Certificate of Incorporation and Our Amended and
Restated Bylaws
Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws
contain provisions that could make it more difficult to acquire us by means of a merger, tender
offer, proxy contest or otherwise, or to remove our incumbent officers and directors. These
provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control
of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of increased
protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited
proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals
because negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Stockholder meetings
. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that a special meeting of
stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or by a
resolution adopted by a majority of our board of directors.
47
Requirements for advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals
. Our amended
and restated bylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and
the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the
direction of the board of directors.
Stockholder action by written consent
. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that no action
that is required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders at any annual or special meeting may
be effected by written consent of stockholders in lieu of a meeting of stockholders, unless the
action to be effected by written consent of stockholders and the taking of such action by such
written consent have expressly been approved in advance by our board of directors. This provision,
which may not be amended except by the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of the
voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors, voting together as a single class, makes it difficult for stockholders to
initiate or effect an action by written consent that is opposed by our board of directors.
Amendment of the bylaws
. Under Delaware law, the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws is
conferred upon the stockholders. A corporation may, however, in its certificate of incorporation
also confer upon the board of directors the power to adopt, amend or repeal its bylaws. Our charter
and amended and restated bylaws grant our board the power to adopt, amend and repeal our amended
and restated bylaws at any regular or special meeting of the board on the affirmative vote of a
majority of the directors then in office. Our stockholders may adopt, amend or repeal our amended
and restated bylaws but only at any regular or special meeting of stockholders by an affirmative
vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
These provisions of our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could
have the effect of discouraging others from attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence,
they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our common stock that often
result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect
of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more
difficult to accomplish transactions which stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best
interests.
Agreement with Union Charter Financial
In March 2005, we entered into an agreement with Union Charter Capital VII, Inc. (UCF) which
covered certain capital commitment obligations of UCF and the Company and set forth certain rights
of UCF if certain commitment thresholds were met. Effective November 30, 2006, we have amended and
restated this agreement in its entirety to clarify certain statements in the original agreement.
As amended and restated, UCF is entitled to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Companys common
stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per share on or prior to June 30, 2007. Upon exercise of this
right, UCF may purchase all or a portion of the shares.
RELATIONSHIPS WITH ISSUER OF EXPERTS NAMED IN REGISTRATION STATEMENT
None.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
48
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
In November 2006, KPMG LLP, a US based accounting firm, became our independent auditor. We
were formerly audited by KPMG Huazhen, the China member firm of KPMG International. The decision to
move the audit function to the United States from China was deemed the best course of action given
our recent opening of our corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas. There were no disagreements
between us and KPMG Huazhen over accounting principles or practices, and the audit firm did not
issue an adverse opinion or disclaimer, regarding our financial statements for the years ending
June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006.
Additionally, their opinions were not qualified and did not have any modifications as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.
We did not consult with KPMG LLP regarding the application of accounting principles or
application before their appointment as our auditors. Our audit committee approved the change to
KPMG LLP.
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON
INDEMNIFICATION OF SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Our bylaws provide that each officer and director of our company shall be indemnified by us
against all costs and expenses actually and necessarily incurred by him or her in connection with
the defense of any action, suit or proceeding in which he or she may be involved or to which he or
she may be made a party by reason of his or her being or having been such director or officer,
except in relation to matters as to which he or she has been finally adjudged in such action, suit
or proceeding to be liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of duty.
The indemnification provisions of our bylaws diminish the potential rights of action, which
might otherwise be available to shareholders by affording indemnification against most damages and
settlement amounts paid by a director in connection with any shareholders derivative action.
However, there are no provisions limiting the right of a shareholder to enjoin a director from
taking actions in breach of his fiduciary duty, or to cause the Company to rescind actions already
taken, although as a practical matter courts may be unwilling to grant such equitable remedies in
circumstances in which such actions have already been taken. Although we presently have directors
liability insurance, there is no assurance that it will provide coverage to the extent directors
would be indemnified under the provisions, and as such, we may be forced to bear a portion or all
of the cost of the directors claims for indemnification under such provisions. If we are forced to
bear the costs for indemnification, the value of our stock may be adversely affected.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted
to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions,
or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is, therefore, unenforceable.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters in connection with the common stock offered hereby will be passed on for
us by Porter & Hedges, L.L.P., 1000 Main Street, Suite 3600, Houston, Texas 77002. Any
underwriters will be advised about other issues relating to any offering by their own legal
counsel.
49
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. as of June 30, 2006
and 2005, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the
period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006, have been included herein in reliance
upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere
herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
50
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. and
subsidiaries (a development-stage enterprise) as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended June 30, 2006 and for the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to
June 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (a
development-stage enterprise) as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2006 and for the
period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
January 25, 2007
F-2
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
3,154,096
|
|
|
$
|
2,706,602
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other currents assets (Note 3)
|
|
|
42,037
|
|
|
|
30,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
3,196,133
|
|
|
$
|
2,737,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 4)
|
|
|
9,854
|
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
Intangible asset, net (Note 5)
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,213,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,751,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
328,198
|
|
|
$
|
114,003
|
|
Loan from a shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
328,198
|
|
|
|
115,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares
authorized: 24,647,500 and 28,030,000 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 10)
|
|
|
246,475
|
|
|
|
280,300
|
|
Additional paid-in capital (Note 10)
|
|
|
8,179,604
|
|
|
|
2,714,810
|
|
Deficit accumulated during development stage
|
|
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
|
|
(358,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,885,350
|
|
|
$
|
2,636,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,213,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,751,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-3
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2003
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
To June 30, 2006
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
expenses and other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
(1,023,229
|
)
|
|
|
(237,463
|
)
|
|
|
(1,261,132
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,042,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,042,979
|
)
|
Project development expenses
|
|
|
(871,882
|
)
|
|
|
(43,679
|
)
|
|
|
(915,561
|
)
|
Technical development
|
|
|
(373,282
|
)
|
|
|
(87,954
|
)
|
|
|
(461,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(5,311,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(369,096
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,680,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
128,996
|
|
|
|
13,623
|
|
|
|
142,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share (Note 8):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted shares
|
|
|
27,754,139
|
|
|
|
27,180,446
|
|
|
|
27,351,936
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
During the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
Development Stage
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at November 4, 2003
(inception)
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period
November 4, 2003 to June
30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2004
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Forfeited in Merger
|
|
|
(94,000,000
|
)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issued in Merger
|
|
|
21,000,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
|
(357,913
|
)
|
Investor contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,190
|
(2)
|
|
|
235,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Conversion of debt to equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,810
|
(2)
|
|
|
5,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Net proceeds from private
placement offering
|
|
|
1,030,000
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
2,473,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,484,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
28,030,000
|
|
|
$
|
280,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,714,810
|
|
|
$
|
(358,353
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,636,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
Net proceeds from private
placement offering
|
|
|
970,000
|
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
2,378,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,387,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,042,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,042,979
|
|
Adjustment related to
return of shares
|
|
|
(4,352,500
|
)
|
|
|
(43,525
|
)
|
|
|
43,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
24,647,500
|
|
|
$
|
246,475
|
|
|
$
|
8,179,604
|
|
|
$
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,885,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the original issuance of shares by the founder of Tamborine, a shell company without any operations. The founders assumed the shell had no value upon creation
and issued shares without cash consideration.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Merger related transactions
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-5
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2003
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
To June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
(Since Inception)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,042,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,042,979
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant, and
equipment
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
4,262
|
|
Amortization of intangible asset
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
(11,219
|
)
|
|
|
(30,818
|
)
|
|
|
(42,037
|
)
|
Increase in accrued expenses and
other payables
|
|
|
214,195
|
|
|
|
114,003
|
|
|
|
328,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(1,931,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
(273,427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,204,888
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(7,885
|
)
|
|
|
(6,231
|
)
|
|
|
(24,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,885
|
)
|
|
|
(6,231
|
)
|
|
|
(24,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows form financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,387,990
|
|
|
|
2,984,110
|
|
|
|
5,372,100
|
|
Loans from (repayments to) shareholders
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
$
|
2,386,840
|
|
|
$
|
2,984,260
|
|
|
$
|
5,383,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
447,494
|
|
|
|
2,704,602
|
|
|
|
3,154,096
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of the period
|
|
|
2,706,602
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the
period
|
|
$
|
3,154,096
|
|
|
$
|
2,706,602
|
|
|
$
|
3,154,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
2,290
|
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
Cash received for interest
|
|
$
|
128,996
|
|
|
$
|
13,623
|
|
|
$
|
142,619
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
3,042,979
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,042,979
|
|
Conversion of debt to equity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-6
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the
period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Organization and description of business
:
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (SES or the Company) is an emerging development stage
technology company involved in the global development and commercialization of gasification
technology. Its principal asset is a license with the Gas Technology Institute (GTI), a U.S.
based non-profit research organization, for U-GAS® technology. See Note 13 Subsequent events -
License Agreement with GTI.
The Companys strategy is to commercialize GTIs technology with the initial focus on
development in Shanghai, China. The Companys headquarters are located in Houston, Texas.
On April 18, 2005, SES Acquisition Corporation, a Florida corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Tamborine Holdings, Inc. (Tamborine), a Mississippi corporation, merged with and
into Synthesis Energy Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation (Synthesis Florida), whereby the
holders of common stock of Synthesis Florida became shareholders of, and Synthesis Florida became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of, Tamborine. The Company accounted for this reverse merger for financial
reporting purposes as an issuance of securities whereby the parties exchanged stock in one company
for stock in another company; therefore, no goodwill or intangibles were recorded in this
transaction. On April 27, 2005, Tamborine changed its name to Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. and
on June 27, 2005, reincorporated in the State of Delaware.
As a condition of the above merger, Synthesis Florida completed a restructuring whereby two
predecessor entities (Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc., a corporation formed under the laws of the
British Virgin Islands, and Synthesis Energy Systems, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability
company) and two entities formed in connection with the restructuring (International Hydrogen
Technologies, a Florida corporation and Innovative Engines, Inc., a Florida corporation) became
wholly owned subsidiaries of Synthesis Florida. The Company accounted for this transaction as an
acquisition between entities under common control (as defined by the Emerging Issues Taskforce
(EITF) Issue No. 02-5) because the two founders of Synthesis Florida owned all of the outstanding
interests in each of the entities in the transaction, at the time of the restructuring. Therefore,
the results of operations, of these new subsidiary companies from the acquisition date of April 18,
2005 are included in the Companys consolidated financial statements as if the restructuring had
been formed at the earliest inception date of each of the subsidiaries. Accordingly, no goodwill
was recorded as a result of this transaction.
(b) Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are in US dollars and include SES, all of
its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. The Company has reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to
the current year presentation. The Company is currently in development stage and has not generated
any operating revenue to date.
(c) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Management considers many factors in selecting appropriate
operational and financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the assumptions that
are used in the preparation of these financial statements. Management must apply significant
judgment in this process. Among the factors, but not fully inclusive of all factors that may be
considered by management in these processes are: the range of accounting policies permitted by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; managements
understanding of the Companys business both historical results and expected future results; the
extent to which
F-7
operational controls exist that provide high degrees of assurance that all desired
information to assist in the estimation is available and reliable or whether there is greater
uncertainty in the information that is available upon which to base the estimate; expectations of
the future performance of the economy, both domestically, and globally, within various areas that
serve the Companys principal customers and suppliers of goods and services; expected rates of
exchange, sensitivity and volatility associated with the assumptions used in developing estimates;
and whether historical trends are expected to be representative of future trends. The estimation
process often times may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future
outcomes and management must select an amount that lies within that range of reasonable estimates
based upon the quantity, quality and risks associated with the variability that might be expected
from the future outcome and the factors considered in developing the estimate. This estimation
process may result in the selection of estimates which could be viewed as conservative or
aggressive by others. Management attempts to use its business and financial accounting judgment in
selecting the most appropriate estimate, however, actual amounts could and will differ from those
estimates.
(d) Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market
value.
(e) Property, plant, and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by using the
straight-line method at rates based on the estimated useful lives of the various classes of
property. Estimates of useful lives are based upon a variety of factors including durability of
the asset, the amount of usage that is expected from the asset, the rate of technological change
and the Companys business plans for the asset. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight
line basis over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Should the
Company change its plans with respect to the use and productivity of property and equipment, it may
require a change in the useful life of the asset or incur a charge to reflect the difference
between the carrying value of the asset and the proceeds expected to be realized upon the assets
sale or abandonment. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and
significant major improvements are capitalized.
(f) Impairment of assets
The Company evaluates fixed assets for impairment if an event or circumstance occurs that
triggers an impairment test. Substantial judgment is necessary in the determination as to whether
an event or circumstance has occurred that may trigger an impairment analysis and in the
determination of the related cash flows from the asset. Estimating cash flows related to
long-lived assets are a difficult and subjective process that applies historical experience and
future business expectations to revenues and related operating costs of assets. Should impairment
appear to be necessary, subjective judgment must be applied to estimate the fair value of the
asset, for which there may be no ready market, which oftentimes results in the use of discounted
cash flow analysis and judgmental selection of discount rates to be used in the discounting
process. If the Company determines an asset has been impaired based on the projected undiscounted
cash flows of the related asset or the business unit over the remaining amortization period, and if
the cash flow analysis indicates that the carrying amount of an asset exceeds related undiscounted
cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair value of the asset or the present
value of the expected future cash flows.
(g) Intangible asset
Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated
useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
(h) Provision for income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
liabilities and assets are determined based on temporary differences between the basis of assets
and liabilities for income tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and
liabilities are classified according to the financial statement classification of the assets and
liabilities generating the differences. Valuation allowances are established when
F-8
necessary based
upon the judgment of management to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized
and could be necessary based upon estimates of future profitability and expenditure levels over
specific time horizons in particular tax jurisdictions.
(i) Foreign currency translation
Assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars
at year-end rates of exchange and income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates
during the year. Adjustments resulting from translating financial statements into U.S. dollars for
the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were immaterial and therefore the Companys financial
statements do not reflect any cumulative translation adjustments which would normally be shown as a
separate component of other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses from foreign currency
transactions are included in net loss.
(j) Research and development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
(k) Stock option plan
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.
123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,
we have elected to account for our stock-based
compensation plans under the intrinsic value method established by Accounting Principles Board
Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
In accordance with the
provisions of APB No. 25, amounts recorded in net income reflect only the amount by which fair
market value is greater than the exercise price of the option at the date of grant. Due to the
thinly traded nature of the Companys stock, the Company uses an average of several days of trades
to calculate fair market value. In accordance with SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of SFAS No. 123,
the effect on our net loss
per share as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based
employee compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2003
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
to June 30, 2006
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
Add: Total stock-based
compensation recorded, net of
tax
|
|
|
3,042,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,042,979
|
|
Less: Total stock-based
employee compensation expense
determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net
of related tax effects (
1
)
|
|
|
(4,132,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,132,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(6,272,314
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,630,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted, as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Basic and diluted pro forma
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value per
share of options granted (1)
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the
computations presented above.
|
F-9
Note 2 Recently issued accounting standards
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment"
(SFAS No.123(R)) requiring the compensation cost relating to share-based payments be recognized
over their vesting periods in the income statement based on their estimated fair values. In April
2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Shared-Based Payment providing for a
phased-in implementation process for SFAS No. 123(R). The Statement will be effective for the
Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2006. The Company expects to record approximately
$12.0 million of stock-based compensation over the next four years based upon options outstanding
at June 30, 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS No. 154)
. This pronouncement
applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and revises the requirements for
accounting for and reporting a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective
application to prior periods financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle,
unless it is impracticable to do so. This pronouncement also requires changes to the method of
depreciation, amortization, or depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets are accounted for as
a change in accounting estimate that is affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154
is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing
accounting pronouncements, including those which are in a transition phase (such as SFAS No.
123(R)) as of the effective date of SFAS No. 154. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
No. 154 to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax
positions. FIN 48 requires we recognize in our financial statements the impact of a tax position,
if the position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits
of the position. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material input on its financial position,
results of operation or cash flows.
Note 3 Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
$
|
13,158
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prepaid legal & consulting services
|
|
|
17,781
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Prepaid rent & related deposits
|
|
|
3,243
|
|
|
|
9,022
|
|
Employee advances
|
|
|
4,389
|
|
|
|
11,796
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,037
|
|
|
$
|
30,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
Note 4 Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
Estimated useful lives
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
2 to 3 years
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
|
$
|
2,957
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lease term
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
8,689
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,116
|
|
|
$
|
6,231
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
4,262
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,854
|
|
|
$
|
5,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the period from
November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006 was $3,960, $302 and $4,262, respectively.
Note 5 Intangible asset
The Companys only intangible asset is a license with the Gas Technology Institute
(GTI); a U.S. based non-profit research organization, for U-GAS® technology in several world-wide
geographic markets, including China, the Appalachian Mountain regions of the United States, India,
Pakistan, Australia and the United Kingdom. This agreement was amended and restated on August 31,
2006. See Note 13 Subsequent Events
License Agreement with GTI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Estimated useful life
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
Use rights of
U-GAS®:
|
|
10 years
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,439
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the period from
November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006 was $1,000, $999 and $2,439, respectively. Based
upon the GTI Agreement that existed as of June 30, 2006, the annual estimated amortization
expense, related to an intangible asset, for the next five years is $1,000 per year.
Note 6 Accrued expenses and other payables
The components of the accrued expenses and other payables are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Reimbursable expenses
|
|
$
|
87,595
|
|
|
$
|
11,929
|
|
Technical, engineering and design services
|
|
|
118,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit, tax and other consulting
|
|
|
91,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
|
24,153
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,038
|
|
|
|
47,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
328,198
|
|
|
$
|
114,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
Note 7 Income taxes
For financial reporting purposes, net loss before income taxes showing domestic and
foreign sources was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(3,396,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,598
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,785,639
|
)
|
|
|
(321,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
The following is a reconciliation of income taxes at the statutory federal income tax rate of
35% to the income tax provision (benefit) recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,182,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed tax benefit at statutory rate
|
|
|
(1,813,832
|
)
|
|
|
(125,270
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Tax on income/(losses) from foreign operations
|
|
|
616,389
|
|
|
|
112,460
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,196,096
|
|
|
|
12,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
The components of the net deferred asset (liabilities) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
144,999
|
|
|
$
|
12,294
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,024,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accruals
|
|
|
28,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,208,390
|
|
|
|
12,294
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,208,390
|
)
|
|
|
(12,294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred assets (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2006 we had approximately $390,107 of federal net operating loss (NOL)
carry forwards, and $56,412 of China NOL carry forwards. The federal NOL carry forwards have
expiration dates through the year 2026. The China NOL carry forwards will expire in 2011.
F-12
The Company has established valuation allowances for uncertainties in realizing the benefit of
tax losses, and other deferred tax assets in all jurisdictions. Future changes in estimates of
taxable income or in tax laws may change the need for the valuation allowance.
Note 8 Net loss per share data
Historical net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Basic loss per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. For the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the period from November 4, 2003
(inception) to June 30, 2006, the number of weighted average shares included in the calculation was
27,754,139, 27,180,446 and 27,351,936 respectively. Stock options are the only potential dilutive
share equivalents the Company has outstanding for the periods presented. No shares related to
options were included in diluted earnings per share for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and
the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006 as their effect would have been
antidilutive as the Company incurred net loss during those periods.
Note 9 Commitments and contingencies
Lease commitments
The Company occupies approximately 3,000 square feet of leased office space in Houston,
Texas, approximately 3,500 square feet of office space in Shanghai, China and small offices in
Miami, Florida, and Beijing, China. Rental expenses incurred under operating leases for the years
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and for the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006
were approximately $27,085, $6,267 and $33,352, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under
non-cancelable operating lease (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) as of
June 30, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
8,033
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
9,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
License agreement
On February 27, 2006, the Company amended its license agreement with the Gas Technology
Institute (GTI), a U.S. based non-profit research organization, for U-GAS® technology.
Commitments under the amended agreement at June 30, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
2008
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 31, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement
with GTI for which the company paid $500,000 in cash and issued 190,500 shares of common stock in
lieu of the payments above. (See Note 13 Subsequent events License Agreement with GTI).
Employment agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with several of its top management
executives which contain specific guaranteed bonuses and/or pay increases based upon certain
specific targets. As of June 30, 2006 none of the specified targets had been met therefore no
accrual has been made for these events.
F-13
Equity and financing transaction
In March 2005, in connection with a private placement for a maximum of 2,000,000 shares of
common stock, (See Note 10 Stockholders Equity) the Company entered into an agreement with
Union Charter Capital VII, Inc. (UCF) which covered certain capital commitment obligations of UCF
and the Company and set forth certain rights of UCF if certain commitment thresholds were met. UCF
met these commitments in connection with the August 2006 private placement of 3,345,715 shares of
common stock. On November 30, 2006, the Company amended and restated its agreement with UCF in its
entirety to clarify certain statements in the previous agreement. As amended and restated, UCF is
entitled to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock at a purchase price of
$2.50 per share on or prior to June 30, 2007. Upon exercise of this right, UCF may purchase all or
a portion of the 2,000,000 shares. The Company estimates the fir value of these options to be $9.8
million dollars, using a Black Scholes options pricing model. The following weighted average
assumption used were as follows: risk-free interest rates of 5.10%, dividend rate of 0.00%,
expected life of 10 months and expected volatility of 58.66%
Tamborine merger related representations and warranties
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc., a corporation formed under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands (Synthesis BVI), and Synthesis Energy Systems, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability
company (Synthesis LLC), were formed as sister companies in November of 2003 to engage in the
business of development and commercialization of the U-GAS® technology. The founders of SES BVI
believed that it was important to be a publicly traded company in order to obtain the capital
necessary to engage in this business. Tamborine Holdings, Inc., a shell company trading on the
Pink Sheets (Tamborine), a centralized quotation service that collects and publishes market maker
quotes for securities traded in the over-the-counter market (the Pink Sheets), was receptive to a
combination transaction with SES BVI. As such, on April 18, 2005, pursuant to the terms of an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement), SES Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Tamborine, merged with and into Synthesis Energy Holdings, Inc., a Florida
corporation (Synthesis Florida), whereby the holders of common stock of Synthesis Florida became
shareholders of, and Synthesis Florida became a wholly-owned subsidiary of, Tamborine. As a
condition of the above merger, Synthesis Florida completed a restructuring whereby each of
Synthesis BVI and Synthesis LLC became wholly owned subsidiaries of Synthesis Florida. On April
27, 2005, Tamborine changed its name to Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. and on June 27, 2005,
reincorporated in the state of Delaware. At the time of the merger, there were 100,000,000 shares
of Tamborine common stock outstanding, 94,000,000 of which were cancelled in connection with the
merger. The remaining 6,000,000 shares became shares of the Company as the surviving entity as a
result of the name change and the reincorporation. An additional 21,000,000 restricted shares
were issued as consideration in the merger to former shareholders of Synthesis Florida, all of whom
were accredited investors.
Tamborine made numerous representations and warranties in the Agreement, including a
representation that all prior offers and sales of its common stock were duly registered or exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities laws.
As noted above, one of the principal reasons that Synthesis Florida completed the merger was to
have access to a public trading market, and Tamborine had represented that its shares were eligible
for trading, and in fact were trading, on the Pink Sheets. The Companys current management team,
which took office beginning in May of 2006, re-examined the facts surrounding the Tamborine
issuances prior to the merger and now believes that Tamborines representation in the Agreement as
to its compliance with federal and state securities laws was incorrect. Although the Companys
current management has not been able to locate any definitive records regarding the prior issuances
of Tamborine, they have been able to determine the following details.
Tamborine was formed in May 2004, and in connection with its formation, issued 100,000,000
shares of its common stock to its three founders, including IFG Investment Services (IFG). The
certificates issued to two of the three founders contained the appropriate restrictive legend
limiting transfer of the shares as is customary in an unregistered private placement. However, the
certificate issued to IFG for 7,500,000 shares was apparently issued without such restrictive
legends. In June 2004, IFG delivered its certificate to Transfer Online, which thereafter began
acting as the transfer agent for Tamborines common stock. Subsequently, on December 2, 2004, IFG
sold these shares to Ford Allen, Inc., which is owned by Clifford Grossman. 1,500,000 of these
shares were subsequently cancelled by Tamborine. In January 2005, a broker-dealer diligence form
was filed by Tamborine with the Pink Sheets under Rule 15c2-11 of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) stating
F-14
that 6,000,000 shares of Tamborine common stock
had been sold in 2004 pursuant to an exemption from registration under Rule 504 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). The Companys current management team believes
that this Rule 15c2-11 form was filed to permit trading of the common stock of Tamborine on the
Pink Sheets. On March 29, 2005, a second Rule 15c2-11 filing was made by Tamborine which stated
that there were 7,500,000 freely tradable shares in the float, meaning that those shares could be
traded on the Pink Sheets, and also stating that 6,000,000 shares had been sold in 2004 to three
investors in Texas under Rule 504.
The Companys current management team believes that 6,000,000 shares of the 7,500,000 shares
that were represented to be freely tradable in Tamborines second 15c2-11 filing, and which
remained outstanding after the merger, were not in fact freely tradable when issued. As noted
above, there are no available definitive records, other than the two Rule 15c2-11 filings,
regarding the issuance of those shares or the possible exemptions from registration under federal
and state securities laws that were used to issue the shares or permit trading of the shares on the
Pink Sheets. IFG has not provided an opinion of counsel confirming that these shares were issued,
and subsequently transferred, subject to an available exemption. Moreover, the representation in
the 15c2-11 filing that issuing these shares under Rule 504 permits those shares to become freely
tradable is likely not correct. Under Rule 504, any shares sold thereunder are restricted
shares and may not be sold in the public markets without the use of an exemption from registration.
We believe that IFG may have based its view on an incorrect and outdated interpretation of Rule
504. This means that resales of these shares by IFG and subsequently Ford Allen, Inc. on the Pink
Sheets may have been in violation of applicable securities laws because the shares were in fact
restricted. Trading by subsequent holders may have been in accordance with applicable securities
laws based on other available exemptions, but we do not have any documentation to confirm any such
conclusions.
The Company is taking a number of steps to deal with these issues and have notified its
transfer agent to cease any further transfers of the Companys common stock without the approval of
management. Additionally, the Company may request that Ford Allen, Inc. surrender its remaining
shares of common stock in return for restricted shares and/or for cancellation. Current Management
of the Company has no reason to believe, at this time, that Ford Allen, Inc. will respond to their
request. They also intend to contact all stockholders who purchased shares of common stock in our
May 2005 and August 2006 private placements to inform them of these issues and give them the
opportunity to have the aggregate purchase price that they paid returned, plus interest. We are
also filing a registration statement on Form SB-2 to (a) cause the Company to become a reporting
company under the Exchange Act, which simplifies the use of Rule 144 to trade Company securities
for eligible stockholders, provides information that is more complete to stockholders and is a key
requirement for listing on a national securities exchange, and (b) register resales of shares held
by investors in the private placements noted above, which provides them with an opportunity to
dispose of shares using the registration statement without any limitations on volume or concerns
about the issues noted above. Lastly, the Company has filed an updated 15c2-11 filing on August
11, 2006 and intends to file another updated 15c2-11 filing in connection with the filing of the
registration statement to provide current and correct information about the Company and the above
matters. Tamborines ''promoters or their ''affiliates and their transferees, within the
meaning of the Securities Act, both before and after the Merger (as described in
BusinessGeneral), are deemed to be ''underwriters within the meaning of the Securities Act.
Any commissions or discounts given to any such broker-dealer may be regarded as underwriting
commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. As such, regardless of technical compliance
with Rule 144 under the Act, because Tamborine was a shell company prior to the Merger, Rule 144
will be unavailable to its promoters and affiliates and their transferees.
As noted above, many aspects of these events cannot be corroborated by documentary evidence or
otherwise. In addition, there is not sufficient evidence relating to the trading history of the
Companys common stock to analyze the range of potential damages, if any, arising out of these
events. In fact, the trading price for our stock has generally increased since it began trading on
the Pink Sheets, and we have made progress in executing its business plan, so it is possible that
these events have not generated significant liabilities. Of course, federal and state regulatory
agencies could also examine these events and commence proceedings against the Company, its officers
and directors (former and current) and the other individuals involved. We do maintain officer and
director liability insurance, and would of course utilize that coverage, if it is available under
the terms of the policy, in the event any liabilities are assessed against officers and directors.
Given the above facts, it is not possible at this time to predict the likelihood that the Company
will in fact have any liability arising out of these events or the amount of such liability, if
any. See Note 13 Subsequent Events Tamborine Merger Repurchase Offer for a discussion of the
completion of the rescission offer.
F-15
Note 10 Stockholders equity
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 100,000,000 shares of common
stock. Prior to the merger transaction between the Company and Synthesis Florida effective on
April 18, 2005 as described in Note 1(a), the Companys total issued and outstanding common stock
was 100,000,000 shares. After the effective date of the merger, 94,000,000 shares of the issued
and outstanding common stock of the Company were forfeited, and 21,000,000 shares of the Company
were issued to the original shareholders of Synthesis Florida as consideration for the merger. As
a result, 27,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock were issued and outstanding on the
effective date of the merger.
Subsequent to the merger, the Company offered for private placement a maximum of 2,000,000
shares of its common stock at a price of $2.50 per share for a maximum aggregate amount of
$5,000,000 to certain accredited investors in 2005. The offering was fully subscribed and, after
deducting for legal and other related expenses, net proceeds of $4,872,100 were received by the
Company. The difference between the offered price and the Companys par value is recorded under
additional paid-in capital. As a result, 29,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock were
issued and outstanding after the close of the private placement.
As part of the reincorporation of the Company from Mississippi to Delaware as described in
Note 1(a), the par value of the Companys common stock was converted from $0.001 per share to
$0.01 per share, with the total number of outstanding shares remaining unchanged. The capital
stock amount and the additional paid-in capital amount in the accompanying financial statements,
including the prior period comparative figures, have been reclassified and recapitalized to reflect
such par value change, with nil net impact on stockholders equity.
During the year ended June 30, 2006, two of the founding shareholders of the Company elected
to take lesser roles in the day-to-day operation of the Company and agreed to surrender a total of
4,352,500 shares of the Companys common stock which were initially issued in the merger. As a
result, the issued and outstanding shares of the Company were reduced from 29,000,000 shares to
24,647,500 shares. The capital stock amount and the additional paid-in capital amount in the
accompanying financial statements have been reclassified and recapitalized to reflect such
reduction in the number of issued and outstanding shares, with no net impact on stockholders
equity.
Note 11 Accounting for stock-based compensation
Under our 2005 SES 2005 Incentive Plan we may grant (a) non-qualified stock options to
our employees, directors and eligible consultants, (b) incentive stock options to employees only in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the plan or (c) restricted stock. The total number of
shares of common stock that may be subject to the granting of incentive awards under the plan is
15% of the Companys issued and outstanding shares on the last day of each calendar quarter
preceding a grant. (See Note 13 Subsequent Events Amendment to the 2005 Incentive Plan). The
plan options vest up to five years and expire five years from the grant date.
F-16
The following is a summary of the status of our 2005 Incentive Plan at June 30, 2006 and
2005, and changes during the years then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
to June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding beginning of
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled
|
|
|
197,500
|
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,500
|
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
4,802,500
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,802,500
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
1,015,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
grant-date fair value of
options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
The following table summarizes information about our outstanding stock options at June
30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
Range of Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Exercise Price
|
$2.50 to $3.00
|
|
|
4,802,500
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
1,015,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
For purposes of the pro forma disclosures in Note 1(k), under SFAS No. 123, the fair
value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used for grants during the years
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the period for November 4, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006,
respectively: risk-free interest rates of 4.96%, 0.00% and 4.96%; dividend rates of $0, $0 and $0;
expected lives of 3.50, 0.00 and 3.50 years; expected volatility of 67.6%, 0.00% and 67.6%.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model and other existing models were developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of, and are highly sensitive
to, subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Our employee stock
options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and changes in
the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.
Note 12 Related party transactions
Companies are considered to be related if a company has the ability, directly or
indirectly, to control a second company or exercise significant influence over a second company in
making financial and operating decisions. Companies are also considered to be related if they are
subject to common control or common significant influence. There was no material related party
transactions during the year ended June 30, 2006.
On December 27, 2004, a shareholder advanced $1,050,000 to the Company at an interest rate of
approximately 1.6% per annum. The advance was repaid with interest expense, approximately $2,290
on February 17, 2005. Since the net amount is zero these amounts are not shown on the Companys
Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended June 30, 2005.
In 2005, loans from shareholders in the amount of $11,000 were converted into paid-in-capital
upon the Agreement of Forgiveness of loan signed on April 18, 2005.
F-17
Note 13 Subsequent events
Joint Venture Project in China
On July 6, 2006, one of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries, Synthesis Energy Systems
Investments, Inc., entered into a cooperative joint venture contract with Shandong Hai Hua Coal &
Chemical Company Ltd. (Hai Hua) which established Synthesis Energy Systems (Zaozhuang) New Gas
Company Ltd. (SES Zaozhuang), a joint venture company that has the primary purpose of developing,
constructing and operating a synthesis gas production plant utilizing the U-GAS® technology.
Pursuant to the terms of the contract, in exchange for their respective ownership shares in SES
Zaozhuang, SES Investments will contribute capital, and Hai Hua will contribute land use rights,
storage facilities and certain other management services to the Company. Hai Hua will buy
synthesis gas from the joint venture company at a specified contract amount. The contract has a
term of fifty years, subject to earlier termination if either SES Zaohuang files for bankruptcy or
becomes insolvent or if the tolling contract between SES Zaozhuang and Hai Hua (discussed in more
detail below) is terminated. Hai Hua has also agreed that the License Agreement is the sole
property of SES Investments and its affiliated entities and that it will not compete with SES
Investments, or its affiliated entities, with respect to fluidized bed gasification technology for
the term of the contract.
The Company is currently estimating that it will contribute approximately $9.1 million as
equity into the newly formed joint venture company. Construction of the plant is expected to be
completed in the second half of the calendar year 2007. The Company and Hai Hua have received
government approvals for the establishment of the joint venture company. As of September 30, 2006
the Company had paid $232,279 to equipment suppliers for downpayments on equipment to be built for
the Hai Hua project.
On October 22, 2006, SES Zaozhuang entered into purchase and sale contract with Hai Hua
pursuant to which Hai Hua will buy, once the plant is completed, synthesis gas from SES Zaozhuang
at a specified contract amount. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, Hai Hua will pay a tolling
fee based upon the available gasification capacity and an energy charge based upon the actual
syngas consumed. Hai Hua is obligated to pay the tolling fee regardless of whether they use the
gasification capacity. If SES Zaozhuang produces more syngas than the capacity that Hai Hua is
required to purchase under the contract, Hai Hua shall have a right of first refusal to purchase
such excess amount. The agreement terminates twenty years from the date the plant becomes
operational.
On February 12, 2007 the Company and Hai Hua amended their joint venture agreement whereby,
Hai Hua was required to contribute approximately $480,000 in cash to the joint venture in addition
to the land use rights, storage facilities and certain other management services.
License Agreement with GTI
On August 31, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement with
GTI for which the Company paid $500,000 in cash and issued 190,500 shares of common stock. Pursuant
to the Amended and Restated License Agreement between the Company and GTI (the License
Agreement), the Company has an exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell U-GAS® systems
using the technology of GTI worldwide as to coal gasification, biomass blends up to 40% biomass,
systems and non-exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell 40% biomass and coal mixture
gasification systems. The License Agreement has an initial term of ten years, but may be extended
for two additional ten years terms (total of 30 years) at the option of the Company. This
agreement also outlines certain restrictive covenants relating to competing, gasification
technologies. Additionally, for each U-GAS® unit for which the Company licenses, designs, builds or
operates which uses coal, or a coal and biomass mixture, as the feed stock, the Company must pay a
royalty and must also provide GTI with a copy of each contract that the Company enters into
relating to a U-GAS® system and report to GTI with their progress on development of the technology
every six months. A failure to comply with any of the above requirements could result in the
termination of the License Agreement by GTI.
In addition, the Company is required to (i) have a contract for the sale of a U-GAS® system
with a customer in the territory covered by the License Agreement no later than August 31, 2007,
(ii) fabricate and put into operation at least one U-GAS® system within the territory covered by
the License Agreement by July 31, 2008 and (iii) fabricate and put into operation at least one
U-GAS® system within the territory covered by the License Agreement for each calendar year of the
License Agreement, beginning with the calendar year 2009. The Company
F-18
is required to disclose to GTI any improvements related to the U-GAS® system which are developed and implemented by the
Company and the manner of using and applying such improvements. Failure to satisfy the
requirements as to these milestones could lead to the revocation of the license by GTI; provided,
however, that GTI is required to give a twelve-month notice of termination and the Company is able
to cure the default and continue the Agreement prior to the expiration of such time period.
Without the prior written consent of GTI, the Company has no right to sublicense any U-GAS®
system other than to customers for which the Company has constructed a U-GAS® system. For a period
of ten years, the Company is restricted from disclosing any confidential information (as defined in
the license) to any person other than employees of its affiliates or contractors who are required
to deal with such information, and such persons will be bound by the confidentiality provisions of
the license. The Company further indemnified GTI and its affiliates from any liability or loss
resulting from unauthorized disclosure or use of any confidential information that it receives.
Amendment to the 2005 Incentive Plan
Effective August 5, 2006, the Companys amended and restated its 2005 Incentive Plan. The
Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Plan (the Plan) increases the number of shares reserved under
the plan to 6,000,000 shares of common stock. The Companys Board of Directors adopted the Plan as
amended and restated on August 5, 2006 and shareholder approval was obtained at the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders on September 25, 2006.
Issuance of Common Stock
In August 2006, the Company received approximately $16,000,000 and issued 3,345,715 shares of
common stock in a round of private placement financing which closed on November 30, 2006.
Amendment to the Union Charter Agreement
On November 30, 2006, the Company amended and restated its agreement with UCF in its entirety
to clarify certain statements in the previous agreement. As amended and restated, UCF is entitled
to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per
share on or prior to June 30, 2007. Upon exercise of this right, UCF may purchase all or a portion
of the 2,000,000 shares. The Company estimates the fair value of these options to be $9.8 million
dollars, using a Black Scholes options pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used were
as follows: risk-free interest rates of 5.10%, dividend rate of 0.00%, expected life of 10 months
and expected volatility of 58.66%.
Amendment to the Merger Agreement
On December 29, 2006, the Company amended the Agreement for the sole purpose of correcting the
number of shares of common stock issued in the merger with Tamborine. The Agreement stated that
21,050,000 shares were issued when in actuality only 21,000,000 shares were issued.
Tamborine Merger Related Repurchase Offer
In March of 2007, the Company contacted all stockholders who purchased shares of common stock
in the Companys May 2005 and August 2006 private placements to inform them of the issues discussed
in Note 10 Stockholders equity Tamborine Merger Related Representation and Warranties, above,
and gave them the opportunity to have the aggregate purchase price that they paid returned, plus
interest. The offer period expired on March 20, 2007, and none of the stockholders elected to
accept the offer. By not accepting the repurchase offer, the Company believes that these
stockholders should be precluded from obtaining similar relief in the future given their decision
to not accept the repurchase offer. In addition, statute of limitations defenses may be available
to the Company in the event any such stockholder attempts to pursue a claim for repurchase of their
shares. More importantly, even if such a claim was determined to be appropriate, the Company
believes that such stockholders would receive less than the current market price for the Companys
common stock. The private placements were completed at prices of $2.50 and $5.50, and the
Companys stock has traded as high as $8.00 since the closing of the private placements. Based on
these factors, the Company believes that the possibility of a loss in this circumstance is remote
under SFAS No. 5.
F-19
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
15,470,097
|
|
|
$
|
3,154,096
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other currents assets
|
|
|
136,096
|
|
|
|
42,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
15,606,193
|
|
|
|
3,196,133
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
202,858
|
|
|
|
9,854
|
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
405,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project prepayment
|
|
|
657,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset, net
|
|
|
1,820,875
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,692,141
|
|
|
$
|
3,213,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
$
|
445,009
|
|
|
$
|
328,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
445,009
|
|
|
|
328,198
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000
shares authorized: 28,183,715 and 24,647,500
shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
281,837
|
|
|
|
246,475
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
29,422,810
|
|
|
|
8,179,604
|
|
Deficit accumulated during development stage
|
|
|
(11,469,461
|
)
|
|
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
11,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
18,247,132
|
|
|
|
2,885,350
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
18,692,141
|
|
|
$
|
3,213,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-20
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
November 4, 2003
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses and
other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,770,034
|
)
|
|
|
(314,929
|
)
|
|
|
(3,031,166
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,742,405
|
)
|
|
|
(392,323
|
)
|
|
|
(6,785,384
|
)
|
Project development costs
|
|
|
(539,836
|
)
|
|
|
(303,792
|
)
|
|
|
(1,455,397
|
)
|
Technical development
|
|
|
(174,956
|
)
|
|
|
(151,242
|
)
|
|
|
(636,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(6,227,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,162,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,908,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
298,499
|
|
|
|
57,719
|
|
|
|
441,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(5,928,732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,104,567
|
)
|
|
|
(11,469,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,928,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,104,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,469,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted shares
|
|
|
27,272,018
|
|
|
|
28,881,444
|
|
|
|
27,315,228
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-21
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses and other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,042,828
|
)
|
|
|
(203,281
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(1,962,860
|
)
|
|
|
(392,323
|
)
|
Project development costs
|
|
|
(164,004
|
)
|
|
|
(201,087
|
)
|
Technical development
|
|
|
(26,349
|
)
|
|
|
(67,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(3,196,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
(864,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
202,376
|
|
|
|
31,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,993,665
|
)
|
|
|
(832,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,993,665
|
)
|
|
$
|
(832,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted shares
|
|
|
28,183,715
|
|
|
|
29,000,000
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-22
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
During the
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stage
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
24,647,500
|
|
|
$
|
246,475
|
|
|
$
|
8,179,604
|
|
|
$
|
(5,540,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,885,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,928,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,928,732
|
)
|
Currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,946
|
|
|
|
11,946
|
|
Net proceeds from private
placement offering
|
|
|
3,345,715
|
|
|
|
33,457
|
|
|
|
16,126,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,159,800
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,742,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,742,405
|
|
Shares issued for amended
GTI license
|
|
|
190,500
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1,374,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
28,183,715
|
|
|
$
|
281,837
|
|
|
$
|
29,422,810
|
|
|
$
|
(11,469,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,946
|
|
|
$
|
18,247,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-23
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
November 4, 2003
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,928,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,104,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,469,461
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,742,405
|
|
|
|
392,323
|
|
|
|
6,785,384
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant
and equipment
|
|
|
15,084
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
19,346
|
|
Loss on disposal of property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
63,049
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
65,488
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
(94,059
|
)
|
|
|
(181,768
|
)
|
|
|
(136,096
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued
expenses and other payables
|
|
|
116,811
|
|
|
|
96,089
|
|
|
|
445,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(2,083,283
|
)
|
|
$
|
(795,687
|
)
|
|
|
(4,288,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(615,384
|
)
|
|
|
(5,225
|
)
|
|
|
(639,500
|
)
|
Amendment of GTI license rights
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
Project prepayment
|
|
|
(657,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(657,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
$
|
(1,772,462
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,796,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
16,159,800
|
|
|
|
2,387,990
|
|
|
|
21,531,900
|
|
Loans from (repayments to)
stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
financing activities
|
|
$
|
16,159,800
|
|
|
$
|
2,386,840
|
|
|
$
|
21,542,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
12,304,055
|
|
|
|
1,585,928
|
|
|
|
15,458,151
|
|
Cash, beginning of the period
|
|
|
3,154,096
|
|
|
|
2,706,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
11,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of the period
|
|
$
|
15,470,097
|
|
|
$
|
4,292,530
|
|
|
$
|
15,470,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-24
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the three and six months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Organization and description of business
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (the Company) is an emerging development stage technology
company involved in the global development and commercialization of gasification technology. Its
principal asset is a license with the Gas Technology Institute (GTI), a U.S. based non-profit
research organization, for U-GAS® technology. The Companys strategy is to commercialize GTIs
technology with the initial focus on development in Shanghai, China. The Companys headquarters is
located in Houston, Texas.
(b) Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are in US dollars and include Synthesis
Energy Systems, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company has reclassified
certain prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation. The Company is currently
in development stage and has not generated any operating revenue to date.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six month
periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to
December 31, 2006 have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information
and disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant
to such rules and regulations. The company believes that the disclosures provided are adequate to
make the information presented not misleading.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
and explanatory notes for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the period from November 4,
2003 (inception) to June 30, 2006.
The results of the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the twelve-month period ending June 30,
2007.
(c) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Management considers many factors in selecting appropriate
operational and financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the assumptions that
are used in the preparation of these financial statements. Management must apply significant
judgment in this process. Among the factors, but not fully inclusive of all factors that may be
considered by management in these processes are: the range of accounting policies permitted by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; managements
understanding of the Companys business both historical results and expected future results; the
extent to which operational controls exist that provide high degrees of assurance that all desired
information to assist in the estimation is available and reliable or whether there is greater
uncertainty in the information that is available upon which to base the estimate; expectations of
the future performance of the economy, both domestically, and globally, within various areas that
serve the Companys principal customers and suppliers of good and services; expected
F-25
rates of exchange, sensitivity and volatility associated with the assumptions used in developing estimates;
and whether historical trends are expected to be representative of future trends. The estimation
process often times may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future
outcomes and management must select an amount that lies within that range of reasonable estimates
based upon the quantity, quality and risks associated with the variability that might be expected
from the future outcome and the factors considered in developing the estimate. This estimation
process may result in the selection of estimates which could be viewed as conservative or
aggressive by others. Management attempts to use is business and financial accounting judgment in
selecting the most appropriate estimate, however, actual amounts could and will differ from those
estimates.
(d) New accounting pronouncements
On July 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
(SFAS 154). SFAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the
accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. The adoption of SFAS 154 did not
have an impact on the Companys results of operations or its financial condition.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108), effective for
fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the
effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in
quantifying a current year misstatement for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The adoption
did not have an effect on the Companys financial statements.
On September 15, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is required to
adopt the provisions of SFAS 157, as applicable, as of January 1, 2008. The Company is currently
evaluating this standard but has not yet determined the impact, if any, this adoption will have on
its financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statements No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits the Company to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value
(the fair value option). The Company would report unrealized gains and losses on items for which
the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting period. This
accounting standard is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after
November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating the effect of adoption of this new standard on its
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 2 Accounting for stock-based compensation
Under our 2005 SES 2005 Incentive Plan, we may grant (a) non-qualified stock options to
our employees, directors and eligible consultants, (b) Incentive Stock options to employees only in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the plan or (c) restricted stock. The total number of
shares of common Stock that may be subject to the granting of incentive awards under the plan is
15% of the Companys issued and outstanding shares on the last day of each calendar quarter
preceding a grant. The plan options vest up to five years and expire five years from the grant
date.
Prior to July 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock option and stock-based compensation plans
using the intrinsic-value method outlined by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25.
Accordingly, we computed compensation cost for each employee stock option granted as the amount by
which the fair market value was greater than the exerciser price of the option at the date of
grant. Due to the thinly traded nature of the Companys stock, the Company uses an average of
several days of trades to calculate fair market value. The amount of compensation cost was
expensed over the vesting period. During the year ended June 30, 2006 the Company recognized
$3,042,979 of stock-based compensation.
F-26
Effective July 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, Share Based Payment and
elected to use the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, compensation cost
recognized for the three months ended December 31, 2006, includes the applicable amounts of: (a)
compensation cost of all stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of June 30,
2006 based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS No. 123 and previously presented in pro forma footnote disclosures, and (b) compensation cost
for all stock-based awards granted subsequent to June 30, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R)). Results for prior periods
have not been restated.
SFAS No. 123R amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, to require reporting of tax
benefits as a financing cash flow, rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. These tax benefits
result from tax deductions in excess of the compensation expense recognized for options exercised.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, no stock options were exercised.
On March 29, 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 107 to address certain
issues related to SFAS No. 123R. SAB 107 provides guidance on transition methods, valuation
methods, income tax effects and other share-based payment topics, and we had also applied this
guidance in our adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP) No. FAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of
Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3). FSP 123R-3 provides for an alternative transition
method for establishing the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool)
related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, which is available to absorb tax
deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. We have elected to adopt this
alternative transition method, otherwise known as the simplified method, in establishing our
beginning APIC pool at July 1, 2006
Effect of Adopting SFAS No. 123(R)
The following is the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) as of July 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
3,742,405
|
|
|
$
|
1,962,860
|
|
Related deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
The amounts above relate to the impact of recognizing compensation expense related to
stock options.
The Company recognizes expense for our stock-based compensation over the vesting period, which
represents the period in which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award
and recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards immediately if the award has immediate
vesting.
F-27
Prior Period Pro Forma Presentation
Under the modified prospective application method, results for prior periods have not been
restated to reflect the effects of implementing SFAS No, 123 (R). The following pro forma
information, as required by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 is presented for comparative purposes and
illustrates the pro forma effect on net loss per share for the period presented as if we had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based compensation prior to
July 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(1,104,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
(832,478
|
)
|
Add: total stock-based compensation recorded, net of tax
|
|
$
|
392,323
|
|
|
$
|
392,323
|
|
Less: total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all
awards, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(712,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(440,155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Basic and diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Assumptions
The fair values for the significant stock-based awards granted during the three months ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Expected life of award
|
|
3.5
|
years
|
|
3.51
|
years
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected volatility of stock
|
|
|
66.31
|
%
|
|
|
71.33
|
%
|
Weighted-average fair value
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
F-28
The expected volatility of stock assumption was derived by referring to changes in the
historical volatility of comparable companies. Forfeiture rates are estimated due to a lack of
historical forfeiture data.
In accordance with SAB 107, we used the simplified method for plain vanilla options to
estimate the expected term of options granted during 2006.
Stock-based award activity during the three months ended December 31, 2006 was as follows
(aggregate intrinsic value in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Term
|
|
Value
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
5,142,500
|
|
|
$
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,367,500
|
|
|
$
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, approximately $11.8 million of estimated expense with respect to
non-vested stock-based awards has yet to be recognized and will be recognized in expense over the
employees remaining weighted average service period of approximately 4.4 years. As of December
31, 2006, 1,187,500 of the above options were exercisable.
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
$2.50 to $3.00
|
|
|
4,962,500
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
1,109,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
$3.01 to $7.00
|
|
|
405,000
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,367,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based award activity for non-vested awards during the three months ended December
31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
4,059,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(104,500
|
)
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
4,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.82
|
|
F-29
Note 3 Intangible asset
The Companys only intangible asset is a license with the Gas Technology Institute
(GTI), a U.S. based non-profit research organization, for U-GAS® technology.
On August 31, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement with
GTI. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated License Agreement between the Company and GTI (the
License Agreement), the Company has an exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell
U-GAS® systems using the technology of GTI worldwide as to coal gasification, biomass blends up to
40% biomass, systems and non-exclusive license to manufacture, make, use and sell 40% biomass and
coal mixture gasification systems. The License Agreement has an initial term of ten years, but may
be extended for two additional ten-year terms (total of 30 years) at the option of the Company.
As consideration for the license, the Company paid $500,000, and issued 190,500 shares of
restricted stock to GTI. Due to the thinly traded nature of the Companys stock, the Company
recorded the 190,500 shares of restricted stock based on a fair value of $1,376,363 determined
using an average of actual trades 5 trading days before and after August 31, 2006 on the Pink
Sheets. We believe that actual trading activity on the Pink Sheets is the best measure of fair
value of the Companys stock. As a part of the agreement the Company is restricted from offering a
competing gasification technology within any market covered by the License Agreement. Additionally,
for each U-GAS® unit for which the Company licenses, designs, builds or operates which uses coal,
or a coal and biomass mixture as the feed stock, the Company must pay a royalty and must also
provide GTI with a copy of each contract that the Company enters into relating to a U-GAS® system
and report to GTI with their progress on development of the technology every six months. A failure
to comply with any of the above requirements could result in the termination of the License
Agreement by GTI.
In addition, the Company is required to (i) have a contract for the sale of a U-GAS® system
with a customer in the territory covered by the License Agreement no later than August 31, 2007,
(ii) fabricate and put into operation at least one U-GAS® system within the territory covered by
the License Agreement by July 31, 2008 and (iii) fabricate and put into operation at least one
U-GAS® system for each calendar year of the License Agreement, beginning with the calendar year
2009. The Company is required to disclose to GTI any improvements related to the U-GAS® system
which are developed and implemented by the Company and the manner of using and applying such
improvements. Failure to satisfy the requirements as to these milestones could lead to the
revocation of the license by GTI; provided, however, that GTI is required to give a twelve-month
notice of termination and the Company is able to cure the default and continue the Agreement prior
to the expiration of such time period.
Without the prior written consent of GTI, the Company has no right to sublicense any U-GAS®
system other than to customers for which the Company has constructed a U-GAS® system. For a period
of ten years, the Company is restricted from disclosing any confidential information (as defined in
the license) to any person other than employees of its affiliates or contractors who are required
to deal with such information, and such persons will be bound by the confidentiality provisions of
the license. The Company further indemnified GTI and its affiliates from any liability or loss
resulting from unauthorized disclosure or use of any confidential information that it receives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Estimated useful life
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
Use rights of
U-GAS®
:
|
|
10 years
|
|
$
|
1,886,363
|
|
|
$
|
65,488
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period
from November 4, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2006 was $47,161, $252 and $65,488, respectively.
F-30
Note 4 Income taxes
Income taxes are recorded utilizing an asset and liability approach. This method gives
consideration to the future tax consequences associated with the differences between the financial
accounting basis and tax basis of the assets and liabilities, and the ultimate realization of any
deferred tax asset resulting from such differences.
Note 5 Net loss per share data
Historical net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Basic loss per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Stock options are the only potential dilutive share equivalents the Company has
outstanding for the periods presented. No shares related to options were included in diluted
earnings per share for the three and six months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period
from November 4, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2006 as their effect would have been antidilutive
as the Company incurred net losses during those periods.
Note 6 Commitments and contingencies
In March 2005, in connection with a private placement for a maximum of 2,000,000 shares
of common stock, the Company entered into an agreement with Union Charter Capital VII. Inc. (UCF)
which covered certain capital commitment obligations of UCF and the Company and set forth certain
rights of UCF if certain commitment thresholds were met. UCF met these commitments in connection
with the August 2006 private placement of 3,345,715 shares of common stock.
On November 30, 2006, the Company amended and restated its agreement with UCF in its entirety
to clarify certain statements in the previous agreement. As amended and restated, UCF is entitled
to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per
share on or prior to June 30, 2007. Upon exercise of this right, UCF may purchase all or a portion
of the 2,000,000 shares. The Company estimates the fair value of these options to be $9.8 million
dollars, using a Black Scholes options pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions
used were as follows: risk-free interest rates of 5.10%, dividend rate of 0.00%, expected life of
10 months and expected volatility of 58.66%.
Note 7 Subsequent events
Amendment to Joint Venture Agreement
On February 12, 2007 the Company and Hai Hua amended their joint venture agreement whereby,
Hai Hua was required to contribute approximately $480,000 in cash to the joint venture in addition
to the land use rights, storage facilities and certain other management services.
Financing of the Joint Venture Project in China
On March 22, 2007 the Company entered into a seven year loan agreement and received
approximately $12 million of loan proceeds pursuant to the terms of a Fixed Asset Loan Contract
with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) to complete the project financing of the
Joint Venture. Additionally during March 2007, the Company funded the final portion of its $9.1
million equity contribution and fully funded a $3.3 million intercompany loan to the Joint Venture.
Key terms of the Fixed Asset Loan Contract with ICBC are as follows:
|
|
|
Term of the loan is 7 years from the commencement date (March 22, 2007) of the
loan.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest for the first year is 7.11% to be adjusted annually based upon the
standard rate announced each year by the Peoples Bank of China. Interest is payable
monthly on the 20
th
day of each month.
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments of approximately $1.0 million are due in March and September
of each year beginning on September 22, 2008 and end on March 21, 2014.
|
F-31
|
|
|
Hai Hua is a guarantor on the loan.
|
|
|
|
|
The Project assets are pledged as collateral on the loan.
|
|
|
|
|
The Joint Venture agreed to covenants that, among other things, prohibit
pre-payment without the consent of ICBC and permit ICBC to be involved in the review
and inspection of the Project.
|
|
|
|
|
The loan is subject to customary events of default which, should one or more of
them occur and be continuing, would permit ICBC to declare all amounts owing under
the contract to be due and payable immediately.
|
Additionally, on March 20, 2007, the Joint Venture entered into and funded a
Shareholders Loan Agreement with Synthesis Investments for approximately $3.3 million (the
Shareholder Loan). The Shareholder Loan bears interest per annum at a rate of 6% and is due and
payable on March 20, 2016. The shareholder Loan is unsecured and is subordinated to the above
described ICBC loan, and any other subsequent ICBC loans. The Joint Venture may not prepay the
Shareholder Loan until the ICBC loan is either paid in full or is fully replaced by another loan.
Proceeds of the Shareholder Loan may only be used for the purpose of developing, constructing,
owning, operating and managing the Project.
Tamborine Merger Related Repurchase Offer
In March of 2007, the Company contacted all stockholders who purchased shares of common stock
in its May 2005 and August 2006 private placements to inform them of the Tamborine Merger related
issues and gave them the opportunity to have the aggregate purchase price that they paid returned,
plus interest. The offer period expired on March 20, 2007, and none of the stockholders elected to
accept the offer. By not accepting the repurchase offer, the Company believes that these
stockholders should be precluded from obtaining similar relief in the future given their decision
to not accept the repurchase offer. In addition, statute of limitations defenses may be available
to the Company in the event any such stockholder attempts to pursue a claim for repurchase of their
shares. More importantly, even if such a claim was determined to be appropriate, the Company
believes that such stockholders would receive less than the current market price for the Companys
common stock. The private placements were completed at prices of $2.50 and $5.50, and the
Companys stock has traded as high as $8.00 since the closing of the private placements. Based on
these factors, the Company believes that the possibility of a loss in this circumstance is remote
under SFAS No. 5.
F-32
PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 24. Indemnification of Directors and Officer
Delaware Law
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, permits a corporation, under
specified circumstances, to indemnify its directors, officers, employees or agents against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlements actually and
reasonably incurred by them in connection with any action, suit or proceeding brought by third
parties by reason of the fact that they were or are directors, officers, employees or agents of the
corporation, if such directors, officers, employees or agents acted in good faith and in a manner
they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reason to believe their conduct was unlawful.
In a derivative action, i.e., one by or in the right of the corporation, indemnification may be
made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred by directors, officers, employees or agents
in connection with the defense or settlement of an action or suit, and only with respect to a
matter as to which they shall have acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to
be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall
be made if such person shall have been adjudged liable to the corporation, unless and only to the
extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that
the defendant directors, officers, employees or agents are fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnity for such expenses despite such adjudication of liability.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that no director shall be personally liable to us or
any of our stockholders for monetary damages resulting from breaches of their fiduciary duty as
directors, except to the extent such limitation on or exemption from liability is not permitted
under the DGCL. The effect of this provision of our certificate of incorporation is to eliminate
our rights and those of our stockholders (through stockholders derivative suits on our behalf) to
recover monetary damages against a director for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director,
including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior, except, as restricted by
the DGCL:
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to we or its stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
|
in respect of certain unlawful dividend payments or stock redemptions or repurchases; and
|
|
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit.
|
This provision does not limit or eliminate our rights or the rights of any stockholder to seek
non-monetary relief, such as an injunction or rescission, in the event of a breach of a directors
duty of care.
If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the
liability of directors, then, in accordance with our certificate of incorporation, the liability of
our directors to us or our stockholders will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent
authorized by the DGCL, as so amended. Any repeal or amendment of provisions of our certificate of
incorporation limiting or eliminating the liability of directors, whether by our stockholders or by
changes in law, or the adoption of any other provisions inconsistent therewith, will (unless
otherwise required by law) be prospective only, except to the extent such amendment or change in
law permits us to further limit or eliminate the liability of directors on a retroactive basis.
II-1
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will, to the fullest extent authorized or
permitted by applicable law, indemnify our current and former directors and officers, as well as
those persons who, while directors or officers of our corporation, are or were serving as
directors, officers, employees or agents of another entity, trust or other enterprise, including
service with respect to an employee benefit plan, in connection with any threatened, pending or
completed proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, against all
expense, liability and loss (including, without limitation, attorneys fees, judgments, fines,
ERISA excise taxes and penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by
any such person in connection with any such proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person
eligible for indemnification pursuant to our certificate of incorporation will be indemnified by us
in connection with a proceeding initiated by such person only if such proceeding was authorized by
our board of directors, except for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification.
The right to indemnification conferred by our certificate of incorporation is a contract right
that includes the right to be paid by us the expenses incurred in defending or otherwise
participating in any proceeding referenced above in advance of its final disposition, provided,
however, that if the DGCL requires, an advancement of expenses incurred by our officer or director
(solely in the capacity as an officer or director of our corporation) will be made only upon
delivery to us of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such officer or director, to repay all amounts
so advanced if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified for
such expenses under our certificate of incorporation or otherwise.
The rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses will not be deemed exclusive of any
other rights which any person covered by our certificate of incorporation may have or hereafter
acquire under law, our certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws, an agreement,
vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise.
Any repeal or amendment of provisions of our certificate of incorporation affecting
indemnification rights, whether by our stockholders or by changes in law, or
the adoption of any other provisions inconsistent therewith, will (unless otherwise required by law) be prospective
only, except to the extent such amendment or change in law permits us to provide broader
indemnification rights on a retroactive basis, and will not in any way diminish or adversely affect
any right or protection existing at the time of such repeal or amendment or adoption of such
inconsistent provision with respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such repeal or
amendment or adoption of such inconsistent provision. Our certificate of incorporation also permits
us, to the extent and in the manner authorized or permitted by law, to indemnify and to advance
expenses to persons other that those specifically covered by our certificate of incorporation.
Our amended and restated bylaws include the provisions relating to advancement of expenses and
indemnification rights consistent with those set forth in our certificate of incorporation. In
addition, our amended and restated bylaws provide for a right of indemnity to bring a suit in the
event a claim for indemnification or advancement of expenses is not paid in full by us within a
specified period of time. Our amended and restated bylaws also permit us to purchase and maintain
insurance, at our expense, to protect us and/or any director, officer, employee or agent of our
corporation or another entity, trust or other enterprise against any expense, liability or loss,
whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or
loss under the DGCL.
Any repeal or amendment of provisions of our amended and restated bylaws affecting
indemnification rights, whether by our board of directors, stockholders or by changes in applicable
law, or
II-2
the adoption of any other provisions inconsistent therewith, will (unless otherwise
required by law) be prospective only, except to the extent such amendment or change in law permits
us to provide broader indemnification rights on a retroactive basis, and will not in any way
diminish or adversely affect any right or protection existing thereunder with respect to any act or
omission occurring prior to such repeal or amendment or adoption of such inconsistent provision.
Item 25. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The following table sets forth the various expenses, all of which will be borne by us, in
connection with the sale and distribution of the securities being registered, other than the
underwriting discounts and commissions. All amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC
registration fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
165,000
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
284,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 26. Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities
In May of 2005, we issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to 23 accredited investors in a
private placement. The aggregate consideration paid for such shares was approximately $5 million.
All the shares of common stock were offered and sold pursuant to the exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D.
In August of 2006, we issued 3,345,715 shares of common stock to 4 accredited investors in a
private placement. The aggregate consideration paid for such shares was approximately $18 million.
All the shares of common stock were offered and sold pursuant to the exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D. Union
Charter Financial acted as the sole and exclusive placement agent for the private placement and
received a fee of $1.4 million, or 8% of the total offering amount, plus expenses. The offering
terminated on November 30, 2006.
II-3
Item 27. Index to Exhibits.
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31,
2007).
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on March 30, 2007).
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration No.
333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Porter & Hedges, L.L.P., with respect to legality of
the securities, including consent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 5.1 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration
No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger among Tamborine
Holdings, Inc., SES Acquisition Corporation, Synthesis Energy
Holdings, Inc. and the shareholders of Synthesis Energy Holdings,
Inc. dated April 4, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Merger by and among the Company, SES Acquisition Corporation,
Synthesis Energy Holdings, Inc., and the shareholders listed on
the signature page thereto dated December 29, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Registration
Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between Synthesis
Energy Systems, Inc. and Gas Technology Institute dated August 31,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Cooperative Joint Venture Contract of SES (Zaozhuang) New Gas
Company Ltd. between Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd.
and Synthesis Energy Systems Investments, Inc. dated July 6, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Amendment to Cooperative Joint Venture Contract of SES (Zaozhuang)
New Gas Company Ltd. between Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical
Company Ltd. and Synthesis Energy Systems Investments, Inc. dated
November 8, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on
Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.6**
|
|
Second Amendment to Cooperative Joint Venture Contract of SES
(Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. between Shandong Hai Hua Coal &
Chemical Company Ltd. and Synthesis Energy Systems Investments,
Inc. dated February 12, 2007.
|
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Contract for Synthesis Gas Purchase and Sales by and between
Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd. and Synthesis Energy
Systems (Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. dated October 22, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.8+
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Timothy E. Vail dated
May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.9+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Timothy
E. Vail dated November 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration
No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.10+
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and David Eichinger dated
May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on
Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.11+
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Donald P. Bunnell dated July 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31,
2007).
|
II-4
|
|
|
10.12+
|
|
Consulting Agreement between the Company and Lorenzo Lamadrid
dated May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
the Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367
)
on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.13**+
|
|
Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.14+
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (four year vesting)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367)
on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.15+
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (five year vesting)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Shareholders Loan Agreement by and between Synthesis Energy
Systems Investments, Inc. and Synthesis Energy Systems (Zaozhuang)
dated March 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15
to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Fixed Assets Loan Contract between Synthesis Energy Systems
(Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. and Industrial and Commercial
Bank of China dated March 27, 2007.
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amended and Restated Commitment Agreement dated November 30, 2006
between the Company and Union Charter Capital VII, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Letter from KPMG Huazhen regarding change in certifying
accountants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-
2
filed on March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
21.1 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration No.
333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Porter & Hedges, L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
|
|
23.2**
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on
Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and this exhibit has been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with such request.
|
|
**
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
+
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
|
II-5
Item 28. Undertakings
(a) The undersigned registrant will:
(1) File, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:
(i) Include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act.
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental
change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range
may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule
424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than
20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration statement.
(iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the
plan of distribution.
(2) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each
post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered and the
offering of such securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering.
(3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the
securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.
(4) For determining liability of the undersigned small business issuer under
the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the
undersigned small business issuer undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the
undersigned small business issuer pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the
underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are
offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the
undersigned small business issuer will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered
to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned small
business issuer relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424
(§ 230.424 of this chapter);
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by
or on behalf of the undersigned small business issuer or used or referred to by the
undersigned small business issuer;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to
the offering containing material information about the undersigned small business
issuer or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned small business
issuer; and
II-6
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by
the undersigned small business issuer to the purchaser
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of
1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than
the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted
by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered,
the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will
be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933
to any purchaser:
(i) If the registrant is relying on Rule 430B:
(A) Each prospectus filed by the registrant to Rule 424(b)(3)
shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the
filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration
statement; and
(B) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule
424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance
on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i),
(vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required by
section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of
and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date
such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date such
form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the
first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the
prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer
and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be
deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to
the securities in the registration statement to which that prospectus
relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to
be the initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement or made in a registration statement or prospectus
that is part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration
statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to
such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the
registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration
statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective
date; or
(d) If the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration
statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be
deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used
after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or
prospectus that is part of the registration statement or
II-7
made in a document incorporated or deemed
incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first
use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus
that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such
date of first use.
II-8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement of Form SB-2 to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Date: May 1, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/ Timothy E. Vail
|
|
|
|
Timothy E. Vail, President
|
|
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
II-9
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Amendment No. 2
to this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity In Which Signed
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy E. Vail
Timothy E. Vail
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
David Eichinger
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Senior
Vice President of Corporate
Development (Principal Financial
Officer)
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
Carol Pearson
|
|
Corporate Controller and Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
Donald Bunnell
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
Asia Pacific and Director
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
Lorenzo Lamadrid
|
|
Director
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
Michael Storey
|
|
Director
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
Denis Slavich
|
|
Director
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
*
Harry Rubin
|
|
Director
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
* /s/ Timothy E. Vail
Timothy E. Vail
|
|
as Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
II-10
Appendix A
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
The following is a description of the meanings of some of the industry terms used and not
otherwise defined in this Form SB-2.
Agglomerates
. To form or collect into a rounded mass.
Bar
. A unit of pressure measurement equal to 100,000 pascals.
Biomass
. Living and recently living biological material that can be used as fuel or for
industrial production.
Bituminous coal
. A relatively hard coal containing a tar-like substance called bitumen.
Btu
. A British Thermal Unit, which is a unit of measurement for the quantity of heat
required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Byproduct
. Secondary or incidental product derived from a manufacturing process or chemical
reaction, which is not the primary product being produced.
Carbonaceuous
. The defining attribute of a substance rich in carbon.
Coke
. Solid carbonaceous residue derived from destructive distillation of low-ash,
low-sulfur bituminous coal
Engineering Block
. A phase of development whereby all mechanical systems are specified and
designed.
Fines
. Coal with a maximum particle size between one-sixteenth inch and one-eighth inch,
occasionally exceeding this maximum.
Fluidized bed
. Type of combustion used in power plants and which suspends solid fuels on
upward-blowing jets of air during the combustion process.
Flux
. A substance used to promote fusion of metals or minerals.
Fuel cell
. An electrochemical energy conversion device designed for continuous
replenishment of the reactants consumed and which produces electricity from an external
supply of fuel and oxidant.
Gasifier
. A vessel which covers carbonaceous materials, such as coal, petroleum, petroleum
coke or biomass, into carbon monoxide and hydrogen and other constituent materials.
High rank
. Coals with higher purity of carbon and less hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen
content.
Integrated gasification combined cycle
. A type of power plant using syngas as a source of
clean fuel.
Low rank
. Coals with lower purity of carbon and less hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen content.
A-1
MMBtu
. Million British Thermal Units.
MW
. Mega watt, or one million watts, which is a unit of measurement of power.
Ncum
. Normal cubic meter.
Oxidant
. A chemical compound that readily transfers oxygen atoms or a substance that gains
electrons in a redox chemical reaction.
Particulates
. Tiny particles of solid (a smoke) or liquid (an aerosol) suspended in a gas.
Poly-generation configuration
. The arrangement of equipment which allows for the use of a
number of commodities, including hydrogen, carbon monoxide, steam and power.
Psia
. A unit of measurement for pressure which means pounds per square inch absolute.
Reactant gases
. A gas which is the starting material for a chemical reaction.
Slagging
. The process of removing a nonmetallic material produced from the mutual
dissolving of flux and nonmetallic materials.
Syngas
. A mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and other products also referred to as
synthesis gas.
A-2
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31,
2007).
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on March 30, 2007).
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration No.
333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Porter & Hedges, L.L.P., with respect to legality of
the securities, including consent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 5.1 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration
No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger among Tamborine
Holdings, Inc., SES Acquisition Corporation, Synthesis Energy
Holdings, Inc. and the shareholders of Synthesis Energy Holdings,
Inc. dated April 4, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Merger by and among the Company, SES Acquisition Corporation,
Synthesis Energy Holdings, Inc., and the shareholders listed on
the signature page thereto dated December 29, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Registration
Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between Synthesis
Energy Systems, Inc. and Gas Technology Institute dated August 31,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Cooperative Joint Venture Contract of SES (Zaozhuang) New Gas
Company Ltd. between Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd.
and Synthesis Energy Systems Investments, Inc. dated July 6, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Amendment to Cooperative Joint Venture Contract of SES (Zaozhuang)
New Gas Company Ltd. between Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical
Company Ltd. and Synthesis Energy Systems Investments, Inc. dated
November 8, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on
Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.6**
|
|
Second Amendment to Cooperative Joint Venture Contract of SES
(Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. between Shandong Hai Hua Coal &
Chemical Company Ltd. and Synthesis Energy Systems Investments,
Inc. dated February 12, 2007.
|
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Contract for Synthesis Gas Purchase and Sales by and between
Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd. and Synthesis Energy
Systems (Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. dated October 22, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.8+
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Timothy E. Vail dated
May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.9+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Timothy
E. Vail dated November 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration
No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.10+
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and David Eichinger dated
May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on
Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.11+
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Donald P. Bunnell dated July 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.12+
|
|
Consulting Agreement between the Company and Lorenzo Lamadrid
dated May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
the Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367)
on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
10.13**+
|
|
Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.14+
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (four year vesting)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367)
on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.15+
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (five year vesting)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Shareholders Loan Agreement by and between Synthesis Energy
Systems Investments, Inc. and Synthesis Energy Systems (Zaozhuang)
dated March 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15
to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on
March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Fixed Assets Loan Contract between Synthesis Energy Systems
(Zaozhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. and Industrial and Commercial
Bank of China dated March 27, 2007.
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amended and Restated Commitment Agreement dated November 30, 2006
between the Company and Union Charter Capital VII, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-2
filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Letter from KPMG Huazhen regarding change in certifying
accountants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement
(Registration No. 333-140367) on Form SB-
2
filed on March 30,
2007).
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
21.1 to the Companys Registration Statement (Registration No.
333-140367) on Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Porter & Hedges, L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
|
|
23.2**
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-140367) on
Form SB-2 filed on January 31, 2007).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and this exhibit has been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with such request.
|
|
**
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
+
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
|
Exhibit 10.13
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
2005 INCENTIVE PLAN
(as amended and restated effective August 5, 2006)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO PLAN GOVERNANCE, COVERAGE AND BENEFITS
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
Purpose
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Plan Administration
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock Available for Incentive Awards
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
Share Pool Adjustments for Awards and Payouts.
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
Common Stock Available.
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
Types of Incentive Awards
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
Other Compensation Programs
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
Repricing
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 2. STOCK OPTIONS
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Grant of Stock Options
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Stock Option Terms
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
Stock Option Exercises
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3. RESTRICTED STOCK
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Award of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Restrictions
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Delivery of Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 5. PROVISIONS RELATING TO PLAN PARTICIPATION
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
Plan Conditions
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
Transferability and Exercisability
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
Rights as a Stockholder
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
Listing and Registration of Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
Change in Stock and Adjustments
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
Termination of Employment, Death, Disability and Retirement
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
Exchange of Incentive Awards
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6. GENERAL
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
Effective Date and Grant Period
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
Funding and Liability of Company
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
Withholding Taxes
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
No Guarantee of Tax Consequences
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
Designation of Beneficiary by Grantee
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
Deferrals
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
Amendment and Termination
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
Requirements of Law
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
Rule 16b-3 Securities Law Compliance and Compliance with Company Policies
|
|
|
27
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
Compliance with Code Section 162(m)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
Successors
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Provisions
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
|
Gender, Tense and Headings
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
6.16
|
|
|
Code Section 409A
|
|
|
29
|
|
ii
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
2005 INCENTIVE PLAN
SECTION 1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO
PLAN GOVERNANCE, COVERAGE AND BENEFITS
WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. authorized the establishment
of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. 2005 Incentive Plan (the Plan) originally effective November 7,
2005 and effective August 5, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the amendment and restatement
of the Plan to increase the number of Shares authorized under the Plan, subject to shareholder
approval as provided herein;
NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:
The purpose of the Plan is to foster and promote the long-term financial success of Synthesis
Energy Systems, Inc. (the
Company
) and its Subsidiaries and to increase stockholder value by: (a)
encouraging the commitment of selected key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors, (b)
motivating superior performance of key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors by means of
long-term performance related incentives, (c) encouraging and providing key Employees, Consultants
and Outside Directors with a program for obtaining ownership interests in the Company which link
and align their personal interests to those of the Companys stockholders, (d) attracting and
retaining key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors by providing competitive incentive
compensation opportunities, and (e) enabling key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors to
Share in the long-term growth and success of the Company.
The Plan provides for payment of various forms of incentive compensation and it is not
intended to be a plan that is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended (
ERISA
). The Plan shall be interpreted, construed and administered consistent with its
status as a plan that is not subject to ERISA.
The Plan shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in effect, subject to the right
of the Board to amend or terminate the Plan at any time pursuant to
Section 5.7
, until all
Shares subject to the Plan have been purchased or acquired according to its provisions. However,
in no event may an Incentive Award be granted under the Plan after the expiration of ten (10) years
from November 7, 2005. Subject to the approval of stockholders, the Plan is amended and restated
effective as of August 5, 2006 (the Effective Date).
1
The following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
(a)
Authorized Officer
. The Chief Executive Officer or any other senior
officer of the Company to whom either of them delegate the authority to execute any
Incentive Agreement for and on behalf of the Company. No officer or director shall be an
Authorized Officer with respect to any Incentive Agreement for himself.
(b)
Board
. The Board of Directors of the Company.
(c)
Change in Control
.
Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Grantees
Incentive Agreement, any of the events described in and subject to
Section 4.7
.
(d)
Code
. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations
and other authority promulgated thereunder by the appropriate governmental authority.
References herein to any provision of the Code shall refer to any successor provision
thereto.
(e)
Committee
.
A committee appointed by the Board consisting of not less than
two directors as appointed by the Board to administer the Plan. During such period that
the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, the Plan shall be administered by a committee
appointed by the Board consisting of not less than two directors who fulfill the
non-employee director requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, the outside
director requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and the independent requirements of
the rules of any national securities exchange or the NASDAQ, as the case may be, on which
any of the securities of the Company are traded, listed or quoted. The Committee may be
the Compensation Committee of the Board, or any subcommittee of the Compensation Committee,
provided that the members of the Committee satisfy the requirements of the previous
provisions of this paragraph. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the composition of the
Board does not provide the Company the ability to establish a committee meeting the
foregoing requirements, the Plan shall be administered by the full Board.
The Board shall have the power to fill vacancies on the Committee arising by
resignation, death, removal or otherwise. The Board, in its sole discretion, may bifurcate
the powers and duties of the Committee among one or more separate committees, or retain all
powers and duties of the Committee in a single Committee. The members of the Committee
shall serve at the discretion of the Board.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs, the term Committee as used in the Plan with
respect to any Incentive Award for an Outside Director shall refer to the entire Board. In
the case of an Incentive Award for an Outside Director, the Board shall have all the powers
and responsibilities of the Committee hereunder as to such Incentive Award, and any actions
as to such Incentive Award may be acted upon only by the Board (unless it otherwise
designates in its discretion). When the Board exercises its authority to act in the
capacity as the Committee hereunder with respect to an Incentive Award for
2
an Outside
Director, it shall so designate with respect to any action that it undertakes in its
capacity as the Committee.
(f)
Common Stock
.
The common stock of the Company, $0.01 par value per Share,
and any class of common stock into which such common Shares may hereafter be converted,
reclassified or recapitalized.
(g)
Company
.
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc., a corporation organized under
the laws of the State of Delaware, and any successor in interest thereto.
(h)
Consultant
.
An independent agent, consultant, attorney, an individual who
has agreed to become an Employee within the next six (6) months, or any other individual
who is not an Outside Director or employee of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary) and
who (i), in the opinion of the Committee, is in a position to contribute to the growth or
financial success of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary), (ii) is a natural person
and (iii) provides bona fide services to the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary), which
services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising
transaction, and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the
Companys securities.
(i)
Covered Employee
.
A named executive officer who is one of the group of
covered employees, as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code and Treasury Regulation §
1.162-27(c) (or its successor), during such period that the Company is a Publicly Held
Corporation.
(j)
Employee
.
Any employee of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary)
within the meaning of Section 3401(c) of the Code who, in the opinion of the Committee, is
in a position to contribute to the growth, development and financial success of the Company
(or any Parent or Subsidiary), including, without limitation, officers who are members of
the Board.
(k)
Employment
.
Employment by the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary), or
by any corporation issuing or assuming an Incentive Award in any transaction described in
Section 424(a) of the Code, or by a parent corporation or a subsidiary corporation of such
corporation issuing or assuming such Incentive Award, as the parent-subsidiary relationship
shall be determined at the time of the corporate action described in Section 424(a) of the
Code. In this regard, neither the transfer of a Grantee from Employment by the Company to
Employment by any Parent or Subsidiary, nor the transfer of a Grantee from Employment by
any Parent or Subsidiary to Employment by the Company, shall be deemed to be a termination
of Employment of the Grantee. Moreover, the Employment of a Grantee shall not be deemed to
have been terminated because of an approved leave of absence from active Employment on
account of temporary illness, authorized vacation or granted for reasons of professional
advancement, education, health, or government service, or military leave, or during any
period required to be treated as a leave of absence by virtue of any applicable statute,
Company personnel policy or agreement. Whether an authorized leave of absence shall
3
constitute termination of Employment hereunder shall be determined by the Committee in its
discretion.
Unless otherwise provided in the Incentive Agreement, the term Employment for
purposes of the Plan is also defined to include (i) compensatory or advisory services
performed by a Consultant for the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary) and (ii) membership
on the Board by an Outside Director.
(l)
Exchange Act
.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(m)
Fair Market Value
. Except as set forth below, the Fair Market Value of
one Share of Common Stock on the date in question is deemed to be (i) the closing price of
a Share of Common Stock as reported on the consolidated reporting system for the securities
exchange(s) on which Shares are then listed or admitted to trading (as reported in the
Wall
Street Journal
or other reputable source), or (ii) if not so reported, the closing price
for a Share as quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (NASDAQ), or (iii) if not quoted
on NASDAQ, the closing price for a Share as quoted by the National Quotation Bureaus Pink
Sheets or the National Association of Securities Dealers OTC Bulletin Board System or any
other method permitted by Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder or as required
by other applicable law or regulation as determined by the Committee. If there was no
public trade of Common Stock on the date in question, Fair Market Value shall be determined
by reference to the last preceding date on which such a trade was so reported or any other
method permitted by Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder
.
If the Company is not a Publicly Held Corporation at the time a determination of the
Fair Market Value of the Common Stock is required to be made hereunder, the determination of
Fair Market Value for purposes of the Plan shall be made by the Committee in its discretion
exercised in good faith and consistent with Code Section 409A as it shall determine. In
this respect, the Committee may rely on such financial data, valuations, experts, and other
sources, in its discretion, as it deems advisable under the circumstances.
(n)
Grantee
.
Any Employee, Consultant or Outside Director who is granted an
Incentive Award under the Plan.
(o)
Immediate Family
.
With respect to a Grantee, the Grantees spouse,
children or grandchildren (including legally adopted and step children and grandchildren).
(p)
Incentive Agreement
.
The written agreement entered into between the
Company and the Grantee setting forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which an
Incentive Award is granted under the Plan, as such agreement is further defined in
Section 5.1(a)
.
(q)
Incentive Award
.
A grant of an award under the Plan to a Grantee,
including any Nonqualified Stock Option, Incentive Stock Option, Reload Option, Restricted
Stock Award, Other Stock-Based Award or Performance Award.
4
(r)
Incentive Stock Option or ISO
.
A Stock Option granted by the Committee to
an Employee under
Section 2
which is designated by the Committee as an Incentive
Stock Option and intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option under Section 422 of the
Code.
(s)
Insider
.
An individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, director
or ten percent (10%) beneficial owner of any class of the Companys equity securities that
is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, all as defined under Section 16
of the Exchange Act.
(t)
Nonqualified Stock Option
.
A Stock Option granted by the Committee to a
Grantee under
Section 2
that is not designated by the Committee as an Incentive
Stock Option.
(u)
Option Price
.
The exercise price at which a Share may be purchased by the
Grantee of a Stock Option.
(v)
Outside Director
.
A member of the Board who is not, at the time of grant
of an Incentive Award, an employee of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary within the
meaning of 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and who is certified by the Board as an independent
director; provided, however, that a person who is a control person or director of an entity
that is the beneficial owner of 25% or more of outstanding Shares of the Company shall not
be deemed to be a non-employee director.
(w)
Parent
.
Any corporation (whether now or hereafter existing) which
constitutes a parent of the Company, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.
(x)
Plan
.
The Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. 2005 Incentive Plan as set forth
herein and as it may be amended from time to time.
(y)
Publicly Held Corporation
.
A corporation issuing any class of common
equity securities required to be registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
(z)
Restricted Stock
.
Shares of Common Stock issued or transferred to a
Grantee pursuant to
Section 3
.
(aa)
Restricted Stock Award
.
An authorization by the Committee to issue or
transfer Restricted Stock to a Grantee.
(bb)
Restriction Period
.
The period of time determined by the Committee and
set forth in the Incentive Agreement during which the transfer of Restricted Stock by the
Grantee is restricted.
(cc)
Share
.
A Share of the Common Stock.
(dd)
Share Pool
.
The number of Shares authorized for issuance under
Section 1.4
, as adjusted for awards and payouts under
Section 1.5
and as
adjusted for changes in corporate capitalization under
Section 4.5
.
5
(ee)
Stock Option or Option
. Pursuant to
Section 2
, (i) an Incentive
Stock Option granted to an Employee or (ii) a Nonqualified Stock Option granted to an
Employee, Consultant or Outside Director, where under such stock option the Grantee has the
right to purchase Shares of Common Stock. In accordance with Section 422 of the Code, only
an Employee may be granted an Incentive Stock Option.
(ff)
Subsidiary
.
Any corporation (whether now or hereafter existing) which
constitutes a subsidiary of the Company, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.
(gg)
Supplemental Payment
. Any amount, as described in Sections 3.4 or 4.3,
that is dedicated to payment of income taxes which are payable by the Grantee resulting
from an Incentive Award.
(a)
Authority of the Committee
.
Except as may be limited by law and subject
to the provisions herein, the Committee shall have full power to (i) select Grantees who
shall participate in the Plan; (ii) determine the sizes, duration and types of Incentive
Awards; (iii) determine the terms and conditions of Incentive Awards and Incentive
Agreements; (iv) determine whether any Shares subject to Incentive Awards will be subject
to any restrictions on transfer; (v) construe and interpret the Plan and any Incentive
Agreement or other agreement entered into under the Plan; and (vi) establish, amend, or
waive rules for the Plans administration. Further, the Committee shall make all other
determinations which may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan
including, without limitation, correcting any defect, supplying any omission or reconciling
any inconsistency in the Plan or any Incentive Agreement. The determinations of the
Committee shall be final and binding.
(b)
Meetings
.
The Committee shall designate a chairman from among its members
who shall preside at all of its meetings, and shall designate a secretary, without regard
to whether that person is a member of the Committee, who shall keep the minutes of the
proceedings and all records, documents, and data pertaining to its administration of the
Plan. Meetings shall be held at such times and places as shall be determined by the
Committee and the Committee may hold telephonic meetings. The Committee may take any
action otherwise proper under the Plan by the affirmative vote, taken with or without a
meeting, of a majority of its members. The Committee may authorize any one or more of
their members or any officer of the Company to execute and deliver documents on behalf of
the Committee.
(c)
Decisions Binding
.
All determinations and decisions made by the Committee
shall be made in its discretion pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, and shall be final,
conclusive and binding on all persons including the Company, its stockholders, Employees,
Grantees, and their estates and beneficiaries. The Committees decisions and
determinations with respect to any Incentive Award need not be uniform and may be made
selectively among Incentive Awards and Grantees, whether or not such Incentive Awards are
similar or such Grantees are similarly situated.
6
(d)
Modification of Outstanding Incentive Awards
.
Subject to the stockholder
approval requirements of
Section 5.7
if applicable, the Committee may, in its
discretion, provide for the extension of the exercisability of an Incentive Award,
accelerate the vesting or exercisability of an Incentive Award, eliminate or make less
restrictive any restrictions contained in an Incentive Award, waive any restriction or
other provisions of an Incentive Award, or otherwise amend or modify an Incentive Award in
any manner (including the repricing of an Incentive Award) that is either (i) not adverse
to the Grantee to whom such Incentive Award was granted or (ii) consented to by such
Grantee. With respect to an Incentive Award that is an incentive stock option (as
described in Section 422 of the Code), no adjustment to such option shall be made to the
extent constituting a modification within the meaning of Section 424(h)(3) unless
otherwise agreed to by the Grantee in writing, and with respect to any Stock Option no
adjustment will be made if it constitutes a modification or results in deferred
compensation under Code Section 409A unless otherwise agreed to by the Grantee in writing.
(e)
Delegation of Authority
.
The Committee may delegate to designated
officers or other employees of the Company any of its duties under this Plan pursuant to
such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish from time to time; provided,
however, while the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, the Committee may not delegate
to any person the authority to (i) grant Incentive Awards, or (ii) take any action which
would contravene the requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act or the
Performance-Based Exception under Section 162(m) of the Code.
(f)
Expenses of Committee
.
The Committee may employ legal counsel, including,
without limitation, independent legal counsel and counsel regularly employed by the
Company, and other agents as the Committee may deem appropriate for the administration of
the Plan. The Committee may rely upon any opinion or computation received from any such
counsel or agent. All expenses incurred by the Committee in interpreting and administering
the Plan, including, without limitation, meeting expenses and professional fees, shall be
paid by the Company.
(g)
Surrender of Previous Incentive Awards
.
The Committee may, in its
absolute discretion, grant Incentive Awards to Grantees on the condition that such Grantees
surrender to the Committee for cancellation such other Incentive Awards (including, without
limitation, Incentive Awards with higher exercise prices) as the Committee directs.
Incentive Awards granted on the condition precedent of surrender of outstanding Incentive
Awards shall not count against the limits set forth in
Section 1.4
until such time
as such previous Incentive Awards are surrendered and canceled.
(h)
INDEMNIFICATION
.
EACH PERSON WHO IS OR WAS A MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE, OR
OF THE BOARD, SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED BY THE COMPANY AGAINST AND FROM ANY DAMAGE, LOSS,
LIABILITY, COST AND EXPENSE THAT MAY BE IMPOSED UPON OR REASONABLY INCURRED BY HIM IN
CONNECTION WITH OR RESULTING FROM ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT, OR PROCEEDING TO WHICH HE MAY BE
A PARTY OR IN WHICH HE
7
MAY BE INVOLVED BY REASON OF ANY ACTION TAKEN OR FAILURE TO ACT
UNDER THE PLAN (INCLUDING SUCH INDEMNIFICATION FOR A PERSONS OWN, SOLE, CONCURRENT OR
JOINT NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY), EXCEPT FOR ANY SUCH ACT OR OMISSION CONSTITUTING
WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OR GROSS NEGLIGENCE. SUCH PERSON SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED BY THE COMPANY
FOR ALL AMOUNTS PAID BY HIM IN SETTLEMENT THEREOF, WITH THE COMPANYS APPROVAL, OR PAID BY
HIM IN SATISFACTION OF ANY JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION, SUIT, OR PROCEEDING AGAINST HIM,
PROVIDED HE SHALL GIVE THE COMPANY AN OPPORTUNITY, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, TO HANDLE AND DEFEND
THE SAME BEFORE HE UNDERTAKES TO HANDLE AND DEFEND IT ON HIS OWN BEHALF. THE FOREGOING
RIGHT OF INDEMNIFICATION SHALL NOT BE EXCLUSIVE OF ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF INDEMNIFICATION TO
WHICH SUCH PERSONS MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER THE COMPANYS ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OR BYLAWS,
AS A MATTER OF LAW, OR OTHERWISE, OR ANY POWER THAT THE COMPANY MAY HAVE TO INDEMNIFY THEM
OR HOLD THEM HARMLESS.
1.4
|
|
Shares of Common Stock Available for Incentive Awards
|
Subject to adjustment under
Section 4.5
, there shall be available for Incentive Awards
that are granted wholly or partly in Common Stock (including rights or Options that may be
exercised for or settled in Common Stock) of six (6) million Shares. The total number of Shares
reserved for issuance under the Plan (pursuant to the previous sentence) that shall be available
for Incentive Stock Options shall be six (6) million. The number of Shares of Common Stock that
are the subject of Incentive Awards under this Plan, that are forfeited or terminated, expire
unexercised, withheld for tax withholding requirements, are settled in cash in lieu of Common Stock
or in a manner such that all or some of the Shares covered by an Incentive Award are not issued to
a Grantee or are exchanged for Incentive Awards that do not involve Common Stock, shall again
immediately become available for Incentive Awards hereunder. The Committee may from time to time
adopt and observe such procedures concerning the counting of Shares against the Plan maximum as it
may deem appropriate. The Board and the appropriate officers of the Company shall from time to
time take whatever actions are necessary to file any required documents with governmental
authorities, stock exchanges and transaction reporting systems to ensure that Shares are available
for issuance pursuant to Incentive Awards.
During any period that the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, the following rules shall
apply to grants of Incentive Awards to Employees:
(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 4.5
, the maximum aggregate
number of Shares of Common Stock (including Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock,
Performance Units and Performance Shares paid out in Shares, or Other Stock-Based Awards
paid out in Shares) that may be granted or that may vest, as applicable, in any calendar
year pursuant to any Incentive Award held by any individual Employee shall be five million
(5,000,000).
8
(b) The maximum aggregate cash payout (including SARs, Performance Units and
Performance Shares paid out in cash, or Other Stock-Based Awards paid out in cash) with
respect to Incentive Awards granted in any calendar year which may be made to any
individual Employee shall be five million dollars ($5,000,000)
.
(c) With respect to any Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted to an
Employee that is canceled or repriced, the number of Shares subject to such Stock Option or
stock appreciation right shall continue to count against the maximum number of Shares that
may be the subject of Stock Options or stock appreciation rights granted to such Employee
hereunder to the extent such is required in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code.
(d) The limitations of
subsections (a)
,
(b)
and
(c)
above
shall be construed and administered so as to comply with the Performance-Based Exception.
1.5
|
|
Share Pool Adjustments for Awards and Payouts.
|
The following Incentive Awards and payouts shall reduce, on a one Share for one Share basis,
the number of Shares authorized for issuance under the Share Pool:
(a) Stock Options;
(b) Restricted Stock Awards; and
(c) A payout of an Other Stock-Based Award or Performance Awards in Shares.
The following transactions shall restore, on a one Share for one Share basis, the number of
Shares authorized for issuance under the Share Pool:
(a) A payout of an Other Stock-Based Award or Performance Awards in the form of cash;
(b) A cancellation, termination, expiration, forfeiture, or lapse for any reason of any
Shares subject to an Incentive Award; and
(c) Payment of an Option Price or Restricted Stock purchase price as provided in the
Incentive Agreement or as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion
with previously acquired Shares or by withholding Shares that otherwise would be acquired on
exercise or grant (i.e., the Share Pool shall be increased by the number of Shares turned in
or withheld as payment of the Option Price or Restricted Stock purchase price).
1.6
|
|
Common Stock Available.
|
The Common Stock available for issuance or transfer under the Plan shall be made available
from Shares now or hereafter (a) held in the treasury of the Company, (b) authorized but unissued
Shares, or (c) Shares to be purchased or acquired by the Company. No fractional Shares shall be
issued under the Plan; payment for fractional Shares shall be made in cash.
9
(a)
Eligibility
.
Under the Plan
,
Incentive Awards may be granted as
determined by the Committee to a Grantee. The Committee shall from time to time designate
those Employees, Consultants and/or Outside Directors, if any, to be granted Incentive
Awards under the Plan, the type of Incentive Awards granted, the number of Shares or Stock
Options, as the case may be, which shall be granted to each such person, and any other
terms or conditions relating to the Incentive Awards as it may deem appropriate to the
extent not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan. A Grantee who has been granted an
Incentive Award may, if otherwise eligible, be granted additional Incentive Awards at any
time.
(b)
Incentive Stock Option Eligibility
.
No Consultant or Outside Director
shall be eligible for the grant of any Incentive Stock Option. In addition, no Employee
shall be eligible for the grant of any Incentive Stock Option who owns or would own
immediately before the grant of such Incentive Stock Option, directly or indirectly, stock
possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of
stock of the Company, or any Parent or Subsidiary. This restriction does not apply if, at
the time such Incentive Stock Option is granted, the Option Price with respect to the
Incentive Stock Option is at least one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market
Value on the date of grant and the Incentive Stock Option by its terms is not exercisable
after the expiration of five (5) years from the date of grant. For the purpose of the
immediately preceding sentence, the attribution rules of Section 424(d) of the Code shall
apply for the purpose of determining an Employees percentage ownership in the Company or
any Parent or Subsidiary. This paragraph shall be construed consistent with the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code.
1.8
|
|
Types of Incentive Awards
|
The types of Incentive Awards that may be granted under the Plan are Stock Options as
described in
Section 2
, Restricted Stock as described in
Section 3
or any
combination of the foregoing.
1.9
|
|
Other Compensation Programs
|
The existence and terms of the Plan shall not limit the authority of the Board or Company or
any Company affiliate in compensating directors, Outside Directors, Employees or Consultants of the
Company, in such other forms and amounts, including compensation pursuant to any other plans or
programs (including but not limited to bonus programs) as may be currently in effect or adopted in
the future, as it may determine from time to time.
In connection with any Incentive Award, the Committee shall have the authority to reprice such
award. Repricing may include, as determined by the Committee, but not be limited to, any of the
following or any other action that has the same effect:
(a) lowering the strike price of a Stock Option after it is granted.
10
(b) any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted
accounting principles, or
(c) canceling a Stock Option at a time when its exercise price exceeds the Fair Market
Value of the underlying stock, in exchange for another stock option, Restricted Stock, or
other equity, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a merger,
acquisition, spin-off or other similar corporate transaction.
SECTION 2.
STOCK OPTIONS
2.1
|
|
Grant of Stock Options
|
The Committee is authorized to grant (a) Nonqualified Stock Options to Employees, Consultants
and/or Outside Directors and (b) Incentive Stock Options to Employees only, in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Plan, and with such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent
with the Plan, as the Committee shall determine in its discretion. Successive grants may be made
to the same Grantee whether or not any Stock Option previously granted to such person remains
unexercised.
(a)
Written Agreement
.
Each grant of a Stock Option shall be evidenced by a
written Incentive Agreement. Among its other provisions, each Incentive Agreement shall
set forth the extent to which the Grantee shall have the right to exercise the Stock Option
following termination of the Grantees Employment. Such provisions shall be determined in
the discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Grantees Incentive Agreement and
need not be uniform among all Stock Options issued pursuant to the Plan.
(b)
Number of Shares
.
Each Stock Option shall specify the number of Shares of
Common Stock to which it pertains.
(c)
Exercise Price
.
The Option Price with respect to each Stock Option shall
be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that in the case of an Incentive Stock
Option, the Option Price shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair
Market Value per Share on the date the Incentive Stock Option is granted (110% for 10% or
greater stockholders pursuant to
Section 1.7(b)
). To the extent that the Company
is a Publicly Held Corporation and the Stock Option is intended to qualify for the
Performance-Based Exception, or to the extent the Stock Option is intended to be exempt
from Code Section 409A, the Option Price shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%)
of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date the Stock Option is granted. Each Stock
Option shall specify the method of exercise which shall be consistent with the requirements
of
Section 2.3(a)
.
11
(d)
Term
.
In the Incentive Agreement, the Committee shall fix the term of
each Stock Option (which shall be not more than five (5) years from the date of grant). In
the event no term is fixed, such term shall be five (5) years from the date of grant.
(e)
Exercise
.
The Committee shall determine the time or times at which a
Stock Option may be exercised in whole or in part. Each Stock Option may specify the
required period of continuous Employment and/or the performance objectives to be achieved
before the Stock Option or portion thereof will become exercisable. Each Stock Option, the
exercise of which, or the timing of the exercise of which, is dependent, in whole or in
part, on the achievement of designated performance objectives, may specify a minimum level
of achievement in respect of the specified performance objectives below which no Stock
Options will be exercisable and a method for determining the number of Stock Options that
will be exercisable if performance is at or above such minimum but short of full
achievement of the performance objectives. All such terms and conditions shall be set
forth in the Incentive Agreement.
(f)
$100,000 Annual Limit on Incentive Stock Options
.
Notwithstanding any
contrary provision in the Plan, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value
(determined as of the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted) of the Shares of Common
Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by
any Grantee during any single calendar year (under the Plan and any other stock option
plans of the Company and its Subsidiaries or Parent) exceeds the sum of $100,000, such
Incentive Stock Option shall be treated as a Nonqualified Stock Option to the extent in
excess of the $100,000 limit, and not an Incentive Stock Option, but all other terms and
provisions of such Stock Option shall remain unchanged. This paragraph shall be applied by
taking Incentive Stock Options into account in the order in which they were granted and
shall be construed in accordance with Section 422(d) of the Code. In the absence of such
regulations or other authority, or if such regulations or other authority require or permit
a designation of the Options which shall cease to constitute Incentive Stock Options, then
such Incentive Stock Options, only to the extent of such excess, shall automatically be
deemed to be Nonqualified Stock Options but all other terms and conditions of such
Incentive Stock Options, and the corresponding Incentive Agreement, shall remain unchanged.
2.3
|
|
Stock Option Exercises
|
(a)
Method of Exercise and Payment
.
Stock Options shall be exercised by the
delivery of a signed written notice of exercise to the Company as of a date set by the
Company in advance of the effective date of the proposed exercise. The notice shall set
forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied
by full payment for the Shares.
The Option Price upon exercise of any Stock Option shall be payable to the Company in
full either: (i) in cash, or (ii) subject to prior approval by the Committee in its
discretion, by withholding Shares which otherwise would be acquired on exercise having an
aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option
12
Price, or (iv)
subject to prior approval by the Committee in its discretion, by a combination of (i), and
(ii) above.
The Committee, in its discretion, also may allow the Option Price to be paid with such
other consideration as shall constitute lawful consideration for the issuance of Shares
(including, without limitation, effecting a cashless exercise with a broker of the
Option), subject to applicable securities law restrictions and tax withholdings, or by any
other means which the Committee determines to be consistent with the Plans purpose and
applicable law. A cashless exercise of an Option is a procedure by which a broker
provides the funds to the Grantee to effect an Option exercise, to the extent consented to
by the Committee in its discretion. At the direction of the Grantee, the broker will either
(i) sell all of the Shares received when the Option is exercised and pay the Grantee the
proceeds of the sale (minus the Option Price, withholding taxes and any fees due to the
broker) or (ii) sell enough of the Shares received upon exercise of the Option to cover the
Option Price, withholding taxes and any fees due the broker and deliver to the Grantee
(either directly or through the Company) a stock certificate for the remaining Shares.
Dispositions to a broker effecting a cashless exercise are not exempt under Section 16 of
the Exchange Act (if the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation). In no event will the
Committee allow the Option Price to be paid with a form of consideration, including, but not
limited to, a loan to employee if such form of consideration would violate the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as determined by the Committee in its discretion.
The Committee, in its discretion, may also allow an Option to be exercised by a
broker-dealer acting on behalf of the Grantee if (i) the broker-dealer has received from the
Grantee a duly endorsed Incentive Agreement evidencing such Option and instructions signed
by the Grantee requesting the Company to deliver the shares of Common Stock subject to such
Option to the broker-dealer on behalf of the Grantee and specifying the account into which
such shares should be deposited, (ii) adequate provision has been made with respect to the
payment of any withholding taxes due upon such exercise, and (iii) the broker-dealer and the
Grantee have otherwise complied with Section 220.3(e)(4) of Regulation T, 12 CFR Part 220
(or its successor).
As soon as practicable after receipt of a written notification of exercise and full
payment, the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to or on behalf of the
Grantee, in the name of the Grantee or other appropriate recipient, Share certificates for
the number of Shares purchased under the Stock Option. Such delivery shall be effected for
all purposes when the Company or a stock transfer agent of the Company shall have deposited
such certificates in the United States mail, addressed to Grantee or other appropriate
recipient.
Subject to
Section 4.2
, during the lifetime of a Grantee, each Option granted
to him shall be exercisable only by the Grantee (or his legal guardian in the event of his
disability as determined by the Committee or as defined in the Incentive Agreement) or by a
broker-dealer acting on his behalf pursuant to a cashless exercise under the foregoing
provisions of this
Section 2.3(a)
.
13
(b)
Restrictions on Share Transferability
.
The Committee may impose such
restrictions on any grant of Stock Options or on any Shares acquired pursuant to the
exercise of a Stock Option as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation,
restrictions under (i) any buy/sell agreement or right of first refusal, non-competition,
and any other agreement between the Company and any of its securities holders or employees,
(ii) any applicable federal securities laws, (iii) the requirements of any stock exchange
or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, or (iv) any blue sky or
state securities law applicable to such Shares. Any certificate issued to evidence Shares
issued upon the exercise of an Incentive Award may bear such legends and statements as the
Committee shall deem advisable to assure compliance with federal and state laws and
regulations.
Any Grantee or other person exercising an Incentive Award may be required by the
Committee to give a written representation that the Incentive Award and the Shares subject
to the Incentive Award will be acquired for investment and not with a view to public
distribution; provided, however, that the Committee, in its sole discretion, may release any
person receiving an Incentive Award from any such representations either prior to or
subsequent to the exercise of the Incentive Award.
Notification of Disqualifying Disposition of Shares from Incentive Stock Options
.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, a Grantee who disposes of Shares of Common
Stock acquired upon the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option by a sale or exchange either
(i) within two (2) years after the date of the grant of the Incentive Stock Option under
which the Shares were acquired or (ii) within one (1) year after the transfer of such Shares
to him pursuant to exercise, shall promptly notify the Company of such disposition, the
amount realized and his adjusted basis in such Shares.
SECTION 3.
RESTRICTED STOCK
3.1
|
|
Award of Restricted Stock
|
(a)
Grant
.
In consideration of the performance of Employment by any Grantee
who is an Employee, Consultant or Outside Director, Shares of Restricted Stock may be
awarded under the Plan by the Committee with such restrictions during the Restriction
Period as the Committee may designate in its discretion, any of which restrictions may
differ with respect to each particular Grantee. Restricted Stock shall be awarded for no
additional consideration or such additional consideration as the Committee may determine,
which consideration may be less than, equal to or more than the Fair Market Value of the
Shares of Restricted Stock on the grant date. The terms and conditions of each grant of
Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Incentive Agreement.
(b)
Immediate Transfer Without Immediate Delivery of Restricted Stock
.
Unless
otherwise specified in the Grantees Incentive Agreement, each Restricted Stock Award shall
constitute an immediate transfer of the record and beneficial ownership of
14
the Shares of
Restricted Stock to the Grantee in consideration of the performance of services as an
Employee, Consultant or Outside Director, as applicable, entitling such Grantee to all
voting and other ownership rights in such Shares.
As specified in the Incentive Agreement, a Restricted Stock Award may limit the
Grantees dividend rights during the Restriction Period in which the Shares of Restricted
Stock are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (within the meaning given to such
term under Code Section 83) and restrictions on transfer. In the Incentive Agreement, the
Committee may apply any restrictions to the dividends that the Committee deems appropriate.
Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, if the grant or vesting of Shares
of Restricted Stock granted to a Covered Employee, if applicable, is designed to comply with
the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may apply any
restrictions it deems appropriate to the payment of dividends declared with respect to such
Shares of Restricted Stock, such that the dividends and/or the Shares of Restricted Stock
maintain eligibility for the Performance-Based Exception. In the event that any dividend
constitutes a derivative security or an equity security pursuant to the rules under Section
16 of the Exchange Act, if applicable, such dividend shall be subject to a vesting period
equal to the remaining vesting period of the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to
which the dividend is paid.
Shares awarded pursuant to a grant of Restricted Stock may be (i) issued in the name of
the Grantee and held, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, by the Committee or
Company (or their delegates) or in trust or in escrow pursuant to an agreement satisfactory
to the Committee or (ii) issued in book entry form or other means of evidencing
uncertificated Shares, as determined by the Committee, until such time as the restrictions
on transfer have expired. All such terms and conditions shall be set forth in the
particular Grantees Incentive Agreement. The Company or Committee (or their delegates)
shall issue to the Grantee a receipt evidencing the certificates held by it which are
registered in the name of the Grantee.
(a)
Forfeiture of Restricted Stock
.
Restricted Stock awarded to a Grantee may
be subject to the following restrictions until the expiration of the Restriction Period:
(i) a restriction that constitutes a substantial risk of forfeiture (as defined in Code
Section 83), or a restriction on transferability; (ii) unless otherwise specified by the
Committee in the Incentive Agreement, the Restricted Stock that is subject to restrictions
which are not satisfied shall be forfeited and all rights of the Grantee to such Shares
shall terminate; and (iii) any other restrictions that the Committee determines in advance
are appropriate, including, without limitation, rights of repurchase or first refusal in
the Company or provisions subjecting the Restricted Stock to a continuing substantial risk
of forfeiture in the hands of any transferee. Any such restrictions shall be set forth in
the particular Grantees Incentive Agreement.
(b)
Issuance of Certificates
.
Reasonably promptly after the date of grant
with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock, the Company shall cause to be issued a stock
certificate, registered in the name of the Grantee to whom such Shares of Restricted
15
Stock were granted, evidencing such Shares; provided, however, that the Company shall not cause
to be issued such a stock certificate unless it has received a stock power duly endorsed in
blank with respect to such Shares; provided, further, in lieu of issuing such a stock
certificate, the Committee may arrange to make book entries or other means of evidencing
uncertificated Shares of Restricted Stock. Each such stock certificate shall bear the
following legend or any other legend approved by the Company:
The transferability of this certificate and the shares of stock
represented hereby are subject to the restrictions, terms and
conditions (including forfeiture and restrictions against transfer)
contained in the Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. 2005 Incentive Plan
and an Incentive Agreement entered into between the registered owner
of such shares and Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. A copy of the
Plan and Incentive Agreement are on file in the corporate offices of
Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc.
Such legend shall not be removed from the certificate evidencing such Shares of Restricted
Stock until such Shares vest pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Agreement.
(c)
Removal of Restrictions
.
The Committee, in its discretion, shall have the
authority to remove any or all of the restrictions on the Restricted Stock if it determines
that, by reason of a change in applicable law or another change in circumstance arising
after the grant date of the Restricted Stock, such action is appropriate.
3.3
|
|
Delivery of Shares of Common Stock
|
Subject to withholding taxes under
Section 5.3
and to the terms of the Incentive
Agreement, a stock certificate evidencing the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which the
restrictions in the Incentive Agreement have been satisfied shall be delivered to the Grantee or
other appropriate recipient free of restrictions. Such delivery shall be effected for all purposes
when the Company shall have deposited such certificate in the United States mail, addressed to the
Grantee or other appropriate recipient.
SECTION 4.
PROVISIONS RELATING TO PLAN PARTICIPATION
(a)
Incentive Agreement
.
Each Grantee to whom an Incentive Award is granted
shall be required to enter into an Incentive Agreement with the Company, in such a form as
is provided by the Committee. The Incentive Agreement shall contain specific terms as
determined by the Committee, in its discretion, with respect to the Grantees particular
Incentive Award. Such terms need not be uniform among all Grantees or any similarly
situated Grantees. The Incentive Agreement may include, without limitation, vesting,
forfeiture and other provisions particular to the particular
16
Grantees Incentive Award, as
well as, for example, provisions to the effect that the Grantee (i) shall not disclose any
confidential information acquired during Employment with the Company, (ii) shall abide by
all the terms and conditions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as may be
imposed by the Committee, (iii) shall not interfere with the employment or other service of
any employee, (iv) shall not compete with the Company or become involved in a conflict of
interest with the interests of the Company, (v) shall forfeit an Incentive Award if
terminated for cause as determined by the Committee or as defined in the Incentive
Agreement, (vi) shall not be permitted to make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code
when applicable, and (vii) shall be subject to any other agreement between the Grantee and
the Company regarding Shares that may be acquired under an Incentive Award including,
without limitation, an agreement restricting the transferability of Shares by Grantee. An
Incentive Agreement shall include such terms and conditions as are determined by the
Committee, in its discretion, to be appropriate with respect to any individual Grantee.
The Incentive Agreement shall be signed by the Grantee to whom the Incentive Award is made
and by an Authorized Officer.
(b)
No Right to Employment
.
Nothing in the Plan or any instrument executed
pursuant to the Plan shall create any Employment rights (including without limitation,
rights to continued Employment) in any Grantee or affect the right of the Company to
terminate the Employment of any Grantee at any time without regard to the existence of the
Plan.
(c)
Securities Requirements
.
The Company shall be under no obligation to
effect the registration pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 of any Shares of Common
Stock to be issued hereunder or to effect similar compliance under any state laws.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be obligated to
cause to be issued or delivered any certificates evidencing Shares pursuant to the Plan
unless and until the Company is advised by its counsel that the issuance and delivery of
such certificates is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental
authorities, and the requirements of any securities exchange on which Shares are traded.
The Committee may require, as a condition of the issuance and delivery of certificates
evidencing Shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms hereof, that the recipient of such
Shares make such covenants, agreements and representations, and that such certificates bear
such legends, as the Committee, in its discretion, deems necessary or desirable.
If the Shares issuable on exercise of an Incentive Award are not registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, the Company may imprint on the certificate for such Shares the
following legend or any other legend which counsel for the Company considers necessary or
advisable to comply with the Securities Act of 1933:
THE SHARES OF STOCK REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE
AND MAY NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED EXCEPT UPON SUCH REGISTRATION OR UPON
RECEIPT BY THE CORPORATION OF
17
AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE
CORPORATION, IN FORM AND SUBSTANCE SATISFACTORY TO THE CORPORATION, THAT
REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR SUCH SALE OR TRANSFER.
4.2
|
|
Transferability and Exercisability
|
Incentive Awards granted under the Plan shall not be transferable or assignable other
than: (a) by will or the laws of descent and distribution or (b) pursuant to a qualified
domestic relations order (as defined by Section 414(p) of the Code (QDRO); provided,
however, that an ISO may only be transferred pursuant to a QDRO if the Incentive Agreement
expressly permits such transfer and provided further that only with respect to Incentive
Awards of Nonqualified Stock Options, the Committee may, in its discretion, authorize all or
a portion of the Nonqualified Stock Options to be granted on terms which permit transfer by
the Grantee to (i) the members of the Grantees Immediate Family, (ii) a trust or trusts for
the exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family, or (iii) a partnership in which such members
of such Immediate Family are the only partners, provided that (A) there may be no
consideration for any such transfer, (B) the Incentive Agreement pursuant to which such
Nonqualified Stock Options are granted must be approved by the Committee, and must expressly
provide for transferability in a manner consistent with this
Section 4.2
, and (C)
subsequent transfers of transferred Options shall be prohibited except in accordance with
clauses (a) and (b) (above) of this sentence. Following any permitted transfer, any
Incentive Award shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were
applicable immediately prior to transfer, provided that the term Grantee shall be deemed
to refer to the transferee. The termination of employment events of
Section 4.6
and
in the Incentive Agreement shall continue to be applied with respect to the original
Grantee, and the Incentive Award shall be exercisable by the transferee only to the extent,
and for the periods, specified in the Incentive Agreement.
Except as may otherwise be permitted under the Code, in the event of a permitted
transfer of a Nonqualified Stock Option hereunder, the original Grantee shall remain subject
to withholding taxes upon exercise. In addition, the Company shall have no obligation to
provide any notices to a transferee including, for example, of the termination of an
Incentive Award following the original Grantees termination of employment.
In the event that a Grantee terminates employment with the Company to assume a position
with a governmental, charitable, educational or other nonprofit institution, the Committee
may, in its discretion, subsequently authorize a third party, including but not limited to a
blind trust, to act on behalf of and for the benefit of such Grantee regarding any
outstanding Incentive Awards held by the Grantee subsequent to such termination of
employment. If so permitted by the Committee, a Grantee may designate a beneficiary or
beneficiaries to exercise the rights of the Grantee and receive any distribution under the
Plan upon the death of the Grantee.
18
No transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to
bind the Company unless the Committee has been furnished with a copy of the deceased
Grantees enforceable will or such other evidence as the Committee deems necessary to
establish the validity of the transfer. Any attempted transfer in violation of this
Section 4.2
shall be void and ineffective. All determinations under this
Section 4.2
shall be made by the Committee in its discretion.
4.3
|
|
Rights as a Stockholder
|
(a)
No Stockholder Rights
.
Except as otherwise provided in
Section
3.1(b)
for grants of Restricted Stock, a Grantee of an Incentive Award (or a permitted
transferee of such Grantee) shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any
Shares of Common Stock until the issuance of a stock certificate for such Shares.
(b)
Representation of Ownership
.
In the case of the exercise of an Incentive
Award by a person or estate acquiring the right to exercise such Incentive Award by reason
of the death or disability of a Grantee, the Committee may require reasonable evidence as
to the ownership of such Incentive Award or the authority of such person and may require
such consents and releases of taxing authorities as the Committee may deem advisable.
4.4
|
|
Listing and Registration of Shares of Common Stock
|
The exercise of any Incentive Award granted hereunder shall only be effective at such time as
counsel to the Company shall have determined that the issuance and delivery of Shares of Common
Stock pursuant to such exercise is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of
governmental authorities and the requirements of any securities exchange on which Shares of Common
Stock are traded. The Committee may, in its discretion, defer the effectiveness of any exercise of
an Incentive Award in order to allow the issuance of Shares of Common Stock to be made pursuant to
a registration statement, or an exemption from registration, or other methods for compliance
available under federal or state securities laws. The Committee shall inform the Grantee in
writing of its decision to defer the effectiveness of the exercise of an Incentive Award. During
the period that the effectiveness of the exercise of an Incentive Award has been deferred, the
Grantee may, by written notice to the Committee, withdraw such exercise and obtain the refund of
any amount paid with respect thereto.
4.5
|
|
Change in Stock and Adjustments
|
(a)
Changes in Law or Circumstances
.
Subject to
Section 4.7
(which
only applies in the event of a Change in Control), in the event of any change in applicable
law or any change in circumstances which results in or would result in any dilution of the
rights granted under the Plan, or which otherwise warrants an equitable adjustment because
it interferes with the intended operation of the Plan, then, if the Committee should so
determine, in its absolute discretion, that such change equitably requires an adjustment in
the number or kind of Shares of stock or other securities or property theretofore subject,
or which may become subject, to issuance or transfer under the Plan or in the terms and
conditions of outstanding Incentive Awards, such adjustment shall
19
be made in accordance
with such determination. Such adjustments may include changes with respect to (i) the
aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan, (ii) the number of Shares
subject to Incentive Awards, and (iii) the Option Price or other price per Share for
outstanding Incentive Awards. Any adjustment under this paragraph of an outstanding
Incentive Stock Option shall be made only to the extent not constituting a modification
within the meaning of Section 424(h)(3) of the Code or with respect to a Stock Option to
the extent not constituting a modification or deferred compensation under Code Section 409A
and the regulations thereunder unless otherwise agreed to by the Grantee in writing. The
Committee shall give notice to each applicable Grantee of such adjustment which shall be
effective and binding.
(b)
Exercise of Corporate Powers
.
The existence of the Plan or outstanding
Incentive Awards hereunder shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company or
its stockholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalization,
reorganization or other changes in the Companys capital structure or its business or any
merger or consolidation of the Company, or any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or
prior preference stocks ahead of or affecting the Common Stock or the rights thereof, or
the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part
of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or proceeding whether of a similar
character or otherwise.
(c)
Recapitalization of the Company
.
Subject to
Section 5.7
(which
only applies in the event of a Change in Control), if while there are Incentive Awards
outstanding, the Company shall effect any subdivision or consolidation of Shares of Common
Stock or other capital readjustment, the payment of a stock dividend, stock split,
combination of Shares, recapitalization or other increase or reduction in the number of
Shares outstanding, without receiving compensation therefor in money, services or property,
then the number of Shares available under the Plan and the number of Incentive Awards which
may thereafter be exercised shall (i) in the event of an increase in the number of Shares
outstanding, be proportionately increased and the Option Price or Fair Market Value of the
Incentive Awards awarded shall be proportionately reduced; and (ii) in the event of a
reduction in the number of Shares outstanding, be proportionately reduced, and the Option
Price or Fair Market Value of the Incentive Awards awarded shall be proportionately
increased. The Committee shall take such action and whatever other action it deems
appropriate, in its discretion, so that the value of each outstanding Incentive Award to
the Grantee shall not be adversely affected by a corporate event described in this
subsection (c).
(d)
Issue of Common Stock by the Company
.
Except as hereinabove expressly
provided in this
Section 5.5
and subject to
Section 4.7
in the event of a
Change in Control, the issue by the Company of Shares of stock of any class, or securities
convertible into Shares of stock of any class, for cash or property, or for labor or
services, either upon direct sale or upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe
therefor, or upon any conversion of Shares or obligations of the Company convertible into
such Shares or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof
shall be made with respect to, the number of, or Option Price or Fair Market Value of, any
Incentive Awards then outstanding under previously granted Incentive Awards;
20
provided, however, in such event, outstanding Shares of Restricted Stock shall be treated the same as
outstanding unrestricted Shares of Common Stock.
(e)
Assumption under the Plan of Outstanding Stock Options
.
Notwithstanding
any other provision of the Plan, the Committee, in its absolute discretion, may authorize
the assumption and continuation under the Plan of outstanding and unexercised stock options
or other types of stock-based incentive awards that were granted under a stock option plan
(or other type of stock incentive plan or agreement) that is or was maintained by a
corporation or other entity that was merged into, consolidated with, or whose stock or
assets were acquired by, the Company as the surviving corporation. Any such action shall
be upon such terms and conditions as the Committee, in its discretion, may deem
appropriate, including provisions to preserve the holders rights under the previously
granted and unexercised stock option or other stock-based incentive award, such as, for
example, retaining the treatment as a Stock Option. Any such assumption and continuation
of any such previously granted and unexercised incentive award shall be treated as an
outstanding Incentive Award under the Plan and shall thus count against the number of
Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to
Section 1.4
. In addition, any Shares
issued by the Company through the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants from an
acquired company shall reduce the Shares available for grants under
Section 1.4
.
(f)
Assumption of Incentive Awards by a Successor
.
Subject to the accelerated
vesting and other provisions of
Section 4.7
that apply in the event of a Change in
Control, in the event of a Corporate Event (defined below), each Grantee shall be entitled
to receive, in lieu of the number of Shares subject to Incentive Awards, such Shares of
capital stock or other securities or property as may be issuable or payable with respect to
or in exchange for the number of Shares which Grantee would have received had he exercised
the Incentive Award immediately prior to such Corporate Event, together with any
adjustments (including, without limitation, adjustments to the Option Price and the number
of Shares issuable on exercise of outstanding Stock Options). For this purpose, Shares of
Restricted Stock shall be treated the same as unrestricted outstanding Shares of Common
Stock. A
Corporate Event
means any of the following: (i) a dissolution or liquidation of
the Company, (ii) a sale of all or substantially all of the Companys assets, (iii) a
merger, consolidation or combination involving the Company (other than a merger,
consolidation or combination (A) in which the Company is the continuing or surviving
corporation and (B) which does not result in the outstanding Shares being converted into or
exchanged for different securities, cash or other property, or any combination thereof), or
(iv) if so determined by the Committee, any other corporate transaction as defined in
Code Sections 424 and 409A and the regulations thereunder. The Committee shall take
whatever other action it deems appropriate to preserve the rights of Grantees holding
outstanding Incentive Awards.
Notwithstanding the previous paragraph of this
Section 4.5(f)
, but subject to
the accelerated vesting and other provisions of
Section 4.7
that apply in the event
of a Change in Control, in the event of a Corporate Event (described in the previous
paragraph), the Committee, in its discretion, shall have the right and power to:
21
(i) cancel, effective immediately prior to the occurrence of the Corporate
Event, each outstanding Incentive Award (whether or not then exercisable) and, in
full consideration of such cancellation, pay to the Grantee an amount in cash equal
to the excess of (A) the value, as determined by the Committee, of the property
(including cash) received by the holders of Common Stock as a result of such
Corporate Event over (B) the exercise price of such Incentive Award, if any;
provided, however, this subsection (i) shall be inapplicable to an Incentive Award
granted within six (6) months before the occurrence of the Corporate Event but only
if the Grantee is an Insider and such disposition is not exempt under Rule 16b-3 (or
other rules preventing liability of the Insider under Section 16(b) of the Exchange
Act) and, in that event, the provisions hereof shall be applicable to such Incentive
Award after the expiration of six (6) months from the date of grant; or
(ii) provide for the exchange or substitution of each Incentive Award
outstanding immediately prior to such Corporate Event (whether or not then
exercisable) for another award with respect to the Common Stock or other property
for which such Incentive Award is exchangeable and, incident thereto, make an
equitable adjustment as determined by the Committee, in its discretion, in the
Option Price or exercise price of the Incentive Award, if any, or in the number of
Shares or amount of property (including cash) subject to the Incentive Award; or
(iii) provide for assumption of the Plan and such outstanding Incentive Awards
by the surviving entity or its parent.
The Committee, in its discretion, shall have the authority to take whatever action it deems
to be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this
subsection (f)
.
4.6
|
|
Termination of Employment, Death, Disability and Retirement
|
The Committee shall provide in the Grantees Incentive Agreement for exercisability periods
and vesting and any other terms in connection with the Grantees Termination of Employment, death,
disability or retirement. Subject to the conditions and limitations of the Plan and applicable law
and regulation in the event that a Grantee ceases to be an Employee, Outside Director or
Consultant, as applicable, for whatever reason, the Committee and Grantee may mutually agree with
respect to any outstanding Option or other Incentive Award then held by the Grantee (i) for an
acceleration or other adjustment in any vesting schedule applicable to the Incentive Award, (ii)
for a continuation of the exercise period following termination for a longer period than is
otherwise provided under such Incentive Award, or (iii) to any other change in the terms and
conditions of the Incentive Award. In the event of any such change to an outstanding Inventive
Award, a written amendment to the Grantees Incentive Agreement shall be required.
Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan, in the event of a Change in Control (as
defined below) the following actions shall automatically occur as of the day immediately
22
preceding
the Change in Control date unless expressly provided otherwise in the Grantees Incentive
Agreement:
(a) all of the Stock Options then outstanding shall become one hundred percent (100%)
vested and immediately and fully exercisable;
(b) If a Grantee is a disqualified individual (as defined in Section 280G of the
Code) and the accelerated vesting of an Incentive Award and/or the termination of the
restricted period occurs with respect to a Change in Control, together with any other
payments which the Grantee has the right to receive from the Company and its Affiliates,
whether or not under this Plan, would constitute a parachute payment (as defined in
Section 280G of the Code), then, except to the extent such Grantee has entered into an
Incentive Award Agreement or a written severance or employment agreement with the Company
that expressly provides for a parachute tax gross-up, such accelerated vesting and/or
termination of the restricted period provided under the paragraph above shall be reduced to
the extent necessary (beginning with Stock Options) so that the present value thereof (as
determined for parachute purposes) to the Grantee will be $1.00 less than three times the
Grantees base amount (as defined in Section 280G of the Code), but only if such
reduction produces a better net after-tax position to the Grantee. Such determinations
shall be made by the Company in good faith.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in the
Grantees Incentive Agreement, the provisions of this
Section 4.7
may not be terminated,
amended, or modified to adversely affect any Incentive Award theretofore granted under the Plan
without the prior written consent of the Grantee with respect to his outstanding Incentive Awards
subject, however, to the last paragraph of this
Section 4.7
.
For all purposes of this Plan, a Change in Control of the Company shall be deemed to occur
if:
(a) any person (as defined in section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, and as such term
is modified in sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, is or becomes the beneficial
owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly of
securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the
Companys then outstanding securities, provided however, that excluded are the following:
(i) the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (ii) a trustee or any fiduciary holding
securities under any Compensation Plan, (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities
pursuant to an offering of such securities, (iv) a corporation owned, directly or
indirectly, by stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership of the Company (for the purposes of this paragraph, Compensation Plan shall
mean any compensation arrangement, plan, policy, practice or program established,
maintained or sponsored by the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, for its employees
generally or any specific group of employees, or to which the Company or any subsidiary of
the Company contributes, and which includes, by way of example and not limitation, any
incentive plan, bonus plan, 401(k) plan, pension plan, savings plan, equity or cash
incentive plan, phantom stock
23
plan, stock appreciation right plan, stock option plan,
restricted stock award plan, retirement plan, deferred compensation plan, or supplemental
benefit arrangement);
(b) during any period of not more than two consecutive years, individuals who at the
beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new director (other than a director
designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a
transaction described in clause (a), (c) or (d) of this definition whose election by the
Board or nomination for election by the Companys stockholders was approved by a vote of at
least a majority of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the
beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so
approved (hereinafter referred to as Continuing Directors), cease for any reason to
constitute at least a majority thereof;
(c) the stockholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company
with any other corporation or entity, other than (i) a merger or consolidation which would
result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto
continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting
securities of the surviving entity), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or
other fiduciary holder of securities under a Compensation Plan, at least 50% of the
combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company (or such surviving entity)
outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (ii) a merger or
consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar
transaction) in which no person acquires more than 50% of the combined voting power of the
Companys then outstanding securities;
(d) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the
Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially
all of the Companys assets; or
(e) any securities offered to investors where such offering is greater than 50% of the
shares of the Company at the time of such offering; provided, further, any other event
determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion to be a Change in Control.
4.8
|
|
Exchange of Incentive Awards
|
The Committee may, in its discretion, permit any Grantee to surrender outstanding Incentive
Awards in order to exercise or realize his rights under other Incentive Awards or in exchange for
the grant of new Incentive Awards, or require holders of Incentive Awards to surrender outstanding
Incentive Awards (or comparable rights under other plans or arrangements) as a condition precedent
to the grant of new Incentive Awards.
24
SECTION 5.
GENERAL
5.1
|
|
Effective Date and Grant Period
|
This Plan, as amended and restated, is adopted by the Board effective as of the Effective Date
subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months from the
Effective Date. Incentive Awards may be granted under the Plan at any time prior to receipt of
such stockholder approval; provided, however, if the requisite stockholder approval is not obtained
within the permissible time frame, then the Plan and any Incentive Awards granted hereunder shall
automatically become null and void and of no force or effect. Unless sooner terminated by the
Board pursuant to
Section 5.7
, no Incentive Award shall be granted under the Plan after ten
(10) years from November 7, 2005.
5.2
|
|
Funding and Liability of Company
|
No provision of the Plan shall require the Company, for the purpose of satisfying any
obligations under the Plan, to purchase assets or place any assets in a trust or other entity to
which contributions are made, or otherwise to segregate any assets. In addition, the Company shall
not be required to maintain separate bank accounts, books, records or other evidence of the
existence of a segregated or separately maintained or administered fund for purposes of the Plan.
Although bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Grantees who are entitled to cash,
Common Stock or rights thereto under the Plan, any such accounts shall be used merely as a
bookkeeping convenience. The Company shall not be required to segregate any assets that may at any
time be represented by cash, Common Stock or rights thereto. The Plan shall not be construed as
providing for such segregation, nor shall the Company, the Board or the Committee be deemed to be a
trustee of any cash, Common Stock or rights thereto. Any liability or obligation of the Company to
any Grantee with respect to an Incentive Award shall be based solely upon any contractual
obligations that may be created by this Plan and any Incentive Agreement, and no such liability or
obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other encumbrance on any
property of the Company. Neither the Company, the Board nor the Committee shall be required to
give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation that may be created by the Plan.
(a)
Tax Withholding
.
The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct
or withhold, or require a Grantee to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy
federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be
withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the Plan or an Incentive
Award hereunder.
(b)
Share Withholding
.
With respect to tax withholding required upon the
exercise of Stock Options, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any
other taxable event arising as a result of any Incentive Awards, Grantees may elect,
subject to the approval of the Committee in its discretion, to satisfy the withholding
25
requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair
Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the statutory total tax which
could be imposed on the transaction. All such elections shall be made in writing, signed
by the Grantee, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee,
in its discretion, deems appropriate. Any fraction of a Share required to satisfy such
obligation shall be disregarded and the amount due shall instead be paid in cash by the
Grantee.
(c)
Incentive Stock Options
.
With respect to Shares received by a Grantee
pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option, if such Grantee disposes of any such
Shares within (i) two (2) years from the date of grant of such Option or (ii) one (1) year
after the transfer of such Shares to the Grantee, the Company shall have the right to
withhold from any salary, wages or other compensation payable by the Company to the Grantee
an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state and local tax withholding requirements
attributable to such disqualifying disposition.
5.4
|
|
No Guarantee of Tax Consequences
|
Neither the Company nor the Committee makes any commitment or guarantee that any federal,
state or local tax treatment will apply or be available to any person participating or eligible to
participate hereunder.
5.5
|
|
Designation of Beneficiary by Grantee
|
Each Grantee may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named
contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his death
before he receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior
designations by the same Grantee, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and will be
effective only when filed by the Grantee in writing with the Committee during the Grantees
lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Grantees death
shall be paid to the Grantees estate.
The Committee may permit a Grantee to defer such Grantees receipt of the payment of cash or
the delivery of Shares that would, otherwise be due to such Grantee by virtue of the lapse or
waiver of restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock, or the satisfaction of any requirements or
goals with respect to Other Stock-Based Awards. If any such deferral election is permitted, the
Committee shall, in its discretion, establish rules and procedures for such payment deferrals to
the extent consistent with the Code.
5.7
|
|
Amendment and Termination
|
The Board shall have complete power and authority to terminate or amend the Plan at any time;
provided, however, if the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, the Board shall not, without the
approval of the stockholders of the Company within the time period required by applicable law, (a)
except as provided in
Section 4.5
, increase the maximum number of Shares which may be
issued under the Plan pursuant to
Section 1.4
, (b) amend the requirements as to the
26
class of Employees eligible to purchase Common Stock under the Plan, (c) to the extent applicable,
increase the maximum limits on Incentive Awards to Covered Employees as set for compliance with the
Performance-Based Exception, (d) extend the term of the Plan, or (e) to the extent applicable,
decrease the authority granted to the Committee under the Plan in contravention of Rule 16b-3 under
the Exchange Act.
No termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan shall adversely affect in any material
way any outstanding Incentive Award previously granted to a Grantee under the Plan, without the
written consent of such Grantee or other designated holder of such Incentive Award.
In addition, to the extent that the Committee determines that (a) the listing for
qualification requirements of any national securities exchange or quotation system on which the
Common Stock is then listed or quoted, if applicable, or (b) the Code (or regulations promulgated
thereunder), require stockholder approval in order to maintain compliance with such listing
requirements or to maintain any favorable tax advantages or qualifications, then the Plan shall not
be amended in such respect without approval of the Companys stockholders.
The granting of Incentive Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to
all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or
national securities exchanges as may be required. The Committee may refuse to issue or transfer
any Shares or other consideration under an Incentive Award if, acting in its sole discretion, it
determines that the issuance or transfer of such Shares or other consideration might violate
applicable laws. Certificates evidencing Shares of Common Stock delivered under this Plan (to the
extent that such Shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer orders and other
restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the
Common Stock is then listed or to which it is admitted for quotation, and any applicable federal or
state securities law, if applicable. The Committee may cause a legend or legends to be placed upon
such certificates (if any) to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
5.9
|
|
Rule 16b-3 Securities Law Compliance and Compliance with Company Policies
|
With respect to Insiders to the extent applicable, transactions under the Plan are intended to
comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. With respect to all
Grantees, transactions under the Plan are intended to comply with Securities Regulation BTR and the
Companys insider trading policies as revised from time to time or such other similar Company
policies, including but not limited to, policies relating to black out periods. Any ambiguities or
inconsistencies in the construction of an Incentive Award or the Plan shall be interpreted to give
effect to such intention. However, to the extent any provision of the Plan or action by the
Committee fails to so comply, it shall be deemed null and void to the extent deemed advisable by
the Committee in its discretion.
27
5.10
|
|
Compliance with Code Section 162(m)
|
While the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, unless otherwise determined by the Committee
with respect to any particular Incentive Award, it is intended that the Plan shall comply fully
with the applicable requirements so that any Incentive Awards subject to Section 162(m) that are
granted to Covered Employees shall qualify for the Performance-Based Exception. If any provision
of the Plan or an Incentive Agreement would disqualify the Plan or would not otherwise permit the
Plan or Incentive Award to comply with the Performance-Based Exception as so intended, such
provision shall be construed or deemed to be amended to conform to the requirements of the
Performance-Based Exception to the extent permitted by applicable law and deemed advisable by the
Committee; provided, however, no such construction or amendment shall have any adverse effect on
the prior grant of an Incentive Award, or the economic value to a Grantee of any outstanding
Incentive Award, unless consented to in writing by the Grantee.
All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Incentive Awards granted
hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor
is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or
substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.
5.12
|
|
Miscellaneous Provisions
|
(a) No Employee, Consultant, Outside Director, or other person shall have any claim or
right to be granted an Incentive Award under the Plan. Neither the Plan, nor any action
taken hereunder, shall be construed as giving any Employee, Consultant, or Outside Director
any right to be retained in the Employment or other service of the Company or any Parent or
Subsidiary.
(b) No Shares of Common Stock shall be issued hereunder unless counsel for the Company
is then reasonably satisfied that such issuance will be in compliance with federal and
state securities laws, if applicable.
(c) The expenses of the Plan shall be borne by the Company.
(d) By accepting any Incentive Award, each Grantee and each person claiming by or
through him shall be deemed to have indicated his acceptance of the Plan.
In the event that any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal, invalid or unenforceable
for any reason, such provision shall be fully severable, but shall not affect the remaining
provisions of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable provision was not included herein.
28
5.14
|
|
Gender, Tense and Headings
|
Whenever the context so requires, words of the masculine gender used herein shall include the
feminine and neuter, and words used in the singular shall include the plural. Section headings as
used herein are inserted solely for convenience and reference and constitute no part of the
interpretation or construction of the Plan.
The Plan shall be interpreted, construed and constructed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware without regard to its conflicts of law provisions, except as may be superseded by
applicable laws of the United States.
To the extent that any Incentive Award is subject to Code Section 409A as determined by the
Committee, the Incentive Agreement shall comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and the
notices and regulations thereunder in a manner as determined by the Committee in its sole
discretion including, but not limited to, using the more restrictive definition of Change in
Control from applicable Code Section 409A regulations and notices to the extent that it is more
restrictive than as defined in the Plan and using the more restrictive definition of Disability as
provided in Section 409A. The Committee may amend any Incentive Award to comply with Code Section
409A and the notices and regulations thereunder without a Grantees consent even if such amendment
would have an adverse affect on a Grantees Incentive Award. The Board may amend the Plan as it
deems necessary to comply with Section 409A and no Grantee consent shall be required even if such
an amendment would have an adverse effect on a Grantees Incentive Award.
[Signature Page Follows]
29
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. has caused this Plan to be duly executed in
its name and on its behalf by its duly authorized officer effective as provided herein.
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Timothy Vail
Timothy Vail, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ David Eicinger
David Eichinger, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
30