UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

 

Commission File Number: 001-11919

 

 

 

 

 

9197 South Peoria Street

Englewood, Colorado 80112

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(303) 397-8100

 

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

 

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  o      No  þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Yes  o      No  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ      No  o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o      No  þ

 

As of June 30, 2008, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were 69,977,236 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock that was held by non-affiliates on such date was $776,202,624 based on the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on such date as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

 

As of February 20, 2009, there were 63,813,892 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Certain information required for Part III of this report is incorporated by reference to the proxy statement for the registrant’s 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

 

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
DECEMBER 31, 2008 FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

 

In various places throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”), we use certain financial measures to describe our performance that are not accepted measures under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (non-GAAP financial measures). We believe such non-GAAP financial measures are informative to the users of our financial information because we use these measures to manage our business. We discuss non-GAAP financial measures in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-K under the heading Presentation of Non-GAAP Measurements.

 

This Form 10-K and the information incorporated by reference contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In particular, we direct your attention to Item 1. Business, Item 3. Legal Proceedings, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. We intend the forward-looking statements throughout this Form 10-K and the information incorporated by reference to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements. All projections and statements regarding our expected financial position and operating results, our business strategy, our financing plans and the outcome of any contingencies are forward-looking statements. These statements can sometimes be identified by our use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “believe,” “plan,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and other words and phrases of similar meaning. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements. The forward-looking information is based on information available as of the date of this Form 10-K and on numerous assumptions and developments that are not within our control. Although we believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you they will turn out to be correct. Actual results could be materially different from our expectations due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the factors identified in this Form 10-K under the captions Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, our other SEC filings and our press releases. We assume no obligation to update: (i) forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or (ii) changes in factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

 

Our Business

 

Over our 27-year history, we have become one of the largest global providers of onshore, offshore and work from home business process outsourcing (“BPO”) services focusing on customer management and enterprise management solutions. We help Global 1000 companies enhance their strategic capabilities, improve quality and lower costs by designing, implementing and managing their critical front- and back-office processes. We provide a 24 x 7, 365 day fully integrated global solution that spans people, process, proprietary technology and infrastructure for governments and private sector clients in the automotive, broadband, cable, financial services, healthcare, logistics, media and entertainment, retail, technology, travel, wireline and wireless communication industries. As of December 31, 2008, our approximately 55,000 employees provide services from nearly 40,000 workstations across 83 delivery centers in 17 countries. We have approximately 100 global clients, many of whom are in the Global 1000. The Global 1000 is a ranking of the world’s largest companies based on market capitalization. We perform a variety of BPO services for our clients and support approximately 250 unique BPO programs.

 

We believe BPO is a key enabler of improved business performance as measured by a company’s ability to consistently outperform peers through business and economic cycles. We believe the benefits of BPO include renewed focus on core capabilities, faster time to market, streamlined processes, movement from a fixed to variable cost structure, access to borderless sourcing capabilities, and creation of proprietary best operating practices and technology, all of which contribute to increased customer satisfaction and shareholder returns for our clients.

 

Industry studies indicate that companies with high customer satisfaction levels enjoy premium pricing in their industry, which we believe results in increased profitability and greater shareholder returns. Given the strong correlation between customer satisfaction and improved profitability, more and more companies are increasingly focused on selecting outsourcing partners, such as TeleTech, that can deliver strategic front- and back-office capabilities to improve the customer experience rather than simply reducing costs.

 

Our Business History

 

We were founded in 1982 and reorganized as a Delaware corporation in 1994. We completed an initial public offering of our common stock in 1996 and since that time have grown our annual revenue from $183 million to $1.4 billion, representing a compounded annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 18.5%.

 

Our revenue is derived from BPO services and is reported in our North American and International BPO segments. These services involve the transfer of our clients’ front- and back-office business processes to our 83 delivery centers or work from home associates. We also manage the facilities and operations of our client’s service delivery centers. Customer management solutions help our clients target, acquire, retain and grow their customer base. Enterprise management solutions help companies manage their internal business process and include product or service provisioning, fulfillment, expense management, supply chain management, claims processing, payment and warranty processing, basic through advanced technical support, human resource recruiting and talent management, retirement plan administration, data analysis and market research, network management, and workforce training and scheduling.

 

We market our services primarily to clients in G-20 countries which represents 19 of the world’s largest economies, together with the European Union and perform these services from strategically located delivery centers around the globe. Many of our clients choose a blended strategy whereby they outsource work with us in multiple geographic locations and may also utilize our work from home offering. We believe our ability to offer one of the most geographically diverse footprints improves service flexibility while reducing operational and delivery risk in the event of a service interruption at any one location.

With operations in 17 countries, we believe this makes us one of the largest and most geographically diverse providers of BPO services. We recently expanded into two new emerging markets (Costa Rica and South Africa) and plan to selectively expand into other attractive delivery markets over time.

 

Of the 17 countries from which we provide BPO services, ten provide services for onshore clients including the U.S., Australia, Brazil, China, England, Germany, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Spain.

 

The other seven countries provide services, partially or entirely, for offshore clients including Argentina, Canada, Costa Rica, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines and South Africa. The total number of workstations in these countries is 25,913, or 65%, of our total delivery capacity.

 

Historical Performance

 

As summarized below, following our initial public offering in 1996, we experienced double-digit revenue growth through 2000, undertook a business transformation strategy in late 2001 and began realizing the benefits of this transformation in 2004 and going forward. Beginning in 1997, we were one of the first companies to provide BPO services to U.S. clients from delivery centers in Argentina, Canada and Mexico.

 

Although revenue growth continued at a CAGR of 4.7% from $913 million in 2001 to $1.0 billion in 2003, we experienced net losses during this time period. We attribute these losses primarily to the global economic downturn, the dot-com bubble, the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the business transformation we undertook to further strengthen our industry position and future competitiveness. The business transformation redefined our delivery model, reduced our cost structure and improved our competitive and financial position by:

 

 

As a result of this business transformation, from 2005 to 2008, our revenue grew at a CAGR of 8.8% from $1.1 billion to $1.4 billion and diluted earnings per share grew at a CAGR of 43.3% from $0.36 to $1.06. Our operating margin more than doubled to 7.8% in 2008 from 2.9% in 2005.

 

As of December 31, 2008, we had $87.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and a debt to equity ratio of 25.0%. We generated $98.9 million in free cash flow during 2008 and our cash flows from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility have enabled us to fund $61.7 million in capital expenditures. Approximately 80% of our capital expenditures were related to growth primarily in

offshore markets with the remaining 20% used for the development and maintenance of our embedded infrastructure. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for discussion of free cash flow and other non-GAAP measurements.

 

Our improved revenue and operating margin in 2008 resulted from growth with both new and existing clients across an expanding array of industry verticals, increased utilization of our delivery centers across a 24-hour period, leveraging our global purchasing power and continued expansion of services provided from our geographically diverse delivery centers.

 

In November 2001, the Board of Directors (“Board”) authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $5.0 million of our common stock with the objective of increasing stockholder returns. The Board has since periodically authorized additional increases in the program. The most recent Board authorization to purchase additional common stock occurred in July 2008, whereby the program allowance was increased by approximately $47.4 million to $100.0 million. Since inception of the program through December 31, 2008, the Board has authorized the repurchase of shares up to a value of $262.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we purchased 6.5 million shares for $89.6 million. Since inception of the program, we have purchased 21.3 million shares for $251.9 million. As of December 31, 2008, remaining allowance under the program was approximately $10.4 million. In February 2009, the Board authorized an increase of $25.0 million in the funding available for share repurchases. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date.

 

Our Future Growth Goals and Strategy

 

Our business strategy to increase revenue, profitability and our industry position includes the following elements:

 

 

 

 

Our Market Opportunity

 

Companies around the world are increasingly realizing that the quality of their customer relationships are critical to maintaining their competitive advantage. This realization has driven companies to increase their focus on developing, managing, growing and continuously enhancing their customer relationships.

Additionally, globalization of the world’s economy continues to accelerate. Businesses are now competing on a large-scale basis due to rapid advances in technology and telecommunications that permit cost-effective real-time global communications and ready access to a highly-skilled worldwide labor force. As a result of these developments, companies have increasingly outsourced business processes to third-party providers in an effort to enhance or maintain their competitive position while increasing shareholder value through improved productivity and profitability.

 

We believe that our revenue will continue to grow over the long-term as global demand for our services is fueled by the following trends:

 

 

Our Business Overview

 

We help Global 1000 clients improve the efficiency of their front- and back-office business processes while increasing customer satisfaction. We manage our clients’ outsourcing needs with the primary goal of delivering a high-quality customer experience while also reducing their total delivery costs.

Our solutions provide access to skilled people in 17 countries using standardized operating processes and a centralized delivery platform to:

 

 

Our Competitive Strengths

 

Entering a business services outsourcing relationship is typically a long-term strategic commitment for companies. The outsourced processes are usually complex and require a high degree of customization and integration with a client’s core operations. Accordingly, our clients tend to enter long-term contracts which provide us with a more predictable revenue stream. In addition, we have high levels of client retention due to our operational excellence and ability to meet our clients’ outsourcing objectives, as well as the significant transition costs required to exit the relationship. Our client retention was 94% in 2008 and 93% in 2007.

 

We believe that our clients select us due to our:

 

 

We believe that technological excellence, best operating practices and innovative human capital strategies that can scale globally are key elements to our continued industry leadership.

 

Technological Excellence

 

Over the past six years, we have measurably transformed our technology platform by moving to a secure, private, 100% internet protocol (“IP”) based infrastructure. This transformation has enabled us to centralize and standardize our worldwide delivery capabilities resulting in improved quality of delivery for our clients along with lower capital and information technology (“IT”) operating costs.

 

The foundation of this platform is our five IP hosting centers known as TeleTech GigaPOPs ^® , which are located on three continents. These centers provide a fully integrated suite of voice and data routing,

workforce management, quality monitoring, storage and business analytic capabilities. This enables anywhere to anywhere, real-time processing of our clients’ business needs from any location around the globe and is the foundation for new, innovative offerings including TeleTech OnDemand ^tm , TeleTech@Home and our suite of human capital solutions. This hub and spoke model enables us to provide our services at the lowest cost while increasing scalability, reliability, redundancy, asset utilization and the diversity of our service offerings.

 

Prior to this technology transformation, each of our delivery centers had a significant investment in disparate hardware and software maintained by on-site IT staff, which was costly to operate and maintain and did not provide the level of reliability or redundancy we now provide.

 

To ensure high end-to-end security and reliability of this critical infrastructure, we monitor and manage the TeleTech GigaPOPs ^® 24 x 7, 365 days per year from several strategically located state-of-the-art global command centers.

 

Our technology innovations have resulted in the filing of more than 20 intellectual property patent applications.

 

Globally Deployed Best Operating Practices

 

Globally deployed best operating practices assure that we can deliver a consistent, scalable, high-quality experience to our clients’ customers from any of our 83 delivery centers or work from home associates around the world. Standardized processes include our approach to attracting, screening, hiring, training, scheduling, evaluating, coaching and maximizing associate performance to meet our clients’ needs. We provide real-time reporting on performance across the globe to ensure consistency of delivery. In addition, this information provides valuable insight into what is driving customer inquiries, enabling us to proactively recommend process changes to our clients to optimize their customers’ experience.

 

Innovative Human Capital Strategies

 

To effectively manage and leverage our human capital requirements, we have developed a proprietary suite of business processes, software tools and client engagement guidelines that work together to improve performance for our clients while enabling us to reduce time to hire, decrease employee turnover and improve time to service and quality of performance.

 

The three primary components of our human capital platform – Talent Acquisition, Learning Services and Performance Optimization – combine to form a powerful and flexible management system to streamline and standardize operations across our global delivery centers. These three components work together to allow us to make better hires, improve training quality and provide real-time feedback and incentives for performance.

 

Innovative New Revenue Opportunities

 

We continue to develop other innovative services that leverage our investment in a centralized and standardized delivery platform to meet our clients’ needs, and we believe that these solutions will represent a growing percentage of our future revenue.

 

TeleTech OnDemand ^tm

 

TeleTech OnDemand ^tm delivers a fully integrated suite of best-in-class business process applications on a hosted (software as a service) basis, providing streamlined delivery center technology, knowledge and services. This allows our clients to empower their associates with the same technology and best practices we use internally on a monthly subscription license model. With TeleTech OnDemand ^tm , there is no need for our clients to license software, purchase on-premise hardware, or staff up to provide ongoing technology support.

 

Our TeleTech OnDemand ^tm solutions are easy to implement and scale seamlessly to support business growth, encompassing the full breadth of business process operations including Interaction Routing, Self-Service, Employee Desktop Management, Business Intelligence and Performance Management.

Because they are based on our rigorous first-hand use, our hosted services are proven, reliable, scalable and continually refined and expanded.

 

TeleTech@Home

 

Our dispersed workforce solution enables employees to work from home while accessing the same proprietary training, workflow, reporting and quality tools as our delivery center associates. TeleTech@Home associates are TeleTech employees – not independent contractors – providing a strong cultural fit, seamless workforce control and high levels of job satisfaction. Our TeleTech@Home solution utilizes our highly scalable and centralized technical architecture and enables secure access, monitoring and reporting for our Global 1000 clients.

 

Features of the new TeleTech@Home offering include:

 

 

Clients

 

In 2008, we had one client that represented more than 10% of our total annual revenue. Sprint Nextel represented 13% of total revenue in 2008. Our top five and ten clients represented 39% and 58% of total revenue in 2008, respectively.

 

Certain of our communications clients, which represent approximately 17% of our total annual revenue, also provide us with telecommunication services through transactions that are negotiated at different times and with different legal entities. We believe each of these supplier contracts is negotiated on an arm’s length basis and that the terms are substantially the same as those that have been negotiated with unrelated vendors. Expenditures under these supplier contracts represent less than one percent of total costs.

 

Competition

 

We compete with the in-house business process operations of our current and potential clients. We also compete with certain companies that provide BPO services including: Accenture Ltd.; Convergys Corporation; Genpact Limited, Sykes Enterprises Incorporated and Teleperformance, among others. We work with Accenture, Computer Sciences Corporation and IBM on a sub-contract basis and approximately 17% of our total revenue is generated from these system integrator relationships.

 

We compete primarily on the basis of our 27 years of experience, our global locations, our quality and scope of services, our speed and flexibility of implementation, our technological expertise, and our price and contractual terms. A number of competitors may have different capabilities and resources than ours. Additionally, niche providers or new entrants could capture a segment of the market by developing new systems or services that could impact our market potential.

 

Seasonality

 

Historically, we experience a seasonal increase in revenue in the fourth quarter related to higher volumes from clients primarily in the healthcare, package delivery, retail and other industries with seasonal businesses. Also, our operating margins in the first quarter are impacted by higher payroll-related taxes with our global workforce.

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately 55,000 employees in 17 countries. Approximately 90% of these employees held full-time positions and 80% were located outside of the U.S. We have approximately 14,800 employees outside the U.S. and Canada covered by collective bargaining agreements. In most cases, the collective bargaining agreements are mandated under national labor laws. These collective bargaining agreements include employees in the following countries:

 

 

We anticipate that these agreements will be renewed and that any renewals will not impact us in a manner materially different from all other companies covered by such industry-wide agreements. In Australia and the United Kingdom, we have approximately 30 employees that have identified themselves as being members of unions, but there is no collective bargaining agreement in place covering these employees. We believe that our relations with our employees and unions are satisfactory. We have not experienced any material work stoppages in our ongoing business.

 

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Technology

 

Our success is partially dependent upon certain proprietary technologies and core intellectual property. We have a number of pending patent applications in the U.S. and foreign countries. Our technology is also protected under copyright laws. Additionally, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality and proprietary information agreements to protect our proprietary technology. We have trademarks or registered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries, including TELETECH ^® , the TELETECH GLOBE Design, TELETECH GIGAPOP ^® , TELETECH GLOBAL VENTURES ^® , HIREPOINT ^® , VISAPOINT ^® , IDENTIFY! ^® , IDENTIFY! PLUS ^® , INCULTURE ^® , TOTAL DELIVERED VALUE ^® and YOUR CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT PARTNER ^® . We believe that several of our trademarks are of material importance. Some of our proprietary technology is licensed to others under corresponding license agreements. Some of our technology is licensed from others. While our competitive position could be affected by our ability to protect our intellectual property, we believe that we have generally taken commercially reasonable steps to protect our intellectual property.

 

Our Corporate Information

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 9197 South Peoria Street, Englewood, Colorado 80112 and the telephone number at that address is (303) 397-8100. Electronic copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and Proxy Statements are available free of charge by (i) visiting the “Investors” section of our website at http://www.teletech.com or (ii) sending a written request to Investor Relations at our corporate headquarters or to investor.relations@teletech.com. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information

statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

 

In evaluating our business, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties discussed in this section, in addition to the other information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only risks that we face. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operation could be materially adversely affected and the market price of our common stock may decline.

 

Risks Relating to Our Business

 

Recent changes in U.S. and global economic conditions could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our business

 

Our business is directly affected by the performance of our clients and general economic conditions. Recent turmoil in the financial markets has adversely affected economic activity in the U.S. and other regions of the world in which we do business. There is evidence that this is affecting demand for some of our services. In substantially all of our client programs, we generate revenue based, in large part, on the amount of time our employees devote to our clients’ customers. Consequently, the amount of revenue generated from any particular client program is dependent upon consumers’ interest in and use of our client’s products and/or services, which may be adversely affected by general economic conditions. Our clients may not be able to market or develop products and services that require their customers to use our services, especially as a result of the recent downturn in the U.S. and worldwide economy. Furthermore, a decline in our clients’ business or performance, including possible client bankruptcies, could impair their ability to pay for our services. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows would be adversely affected if any of our major clients were unable or unwilling, for any reason, to pay for our services.

 

A large portion of our revenue is generated from a limited number of clients, and the loss of one or more of our clients could cause a reduction in our revenue and operating results

 

We rely on strategic, long-term relationships with large, global companies in targeted industries. As a result, we derive a substantial portion of our revenue from relatively few clients. Our five largest clients collectively represented 39% of revenue in 2008 and 40% of revenue in 2007. Our ten largest clients represented 58% of revenue in 2008 and 59% of revenue in 2007. One of our clients, Sprint Nextel, represented 13% of our revenue in 2008 and 15% of our revenue in 2007. Sprint Nextel was the only client that represented over 10% of our revenue during these periods.

 

We believe that a substantial portion of our total revenue will continue to be derived from a relatively small number of our clients in the future. The contracts with our five largest clients expire between 2009 and 2011. We have historically renewed most of our contracts with our largest clients. However, there is no assurance that any contracts will be renewed or, if renewed, will be on terms as favorable as the existing contracts. The volumes and profit margins of our most significant programs may decline and we may not be able to replace such clients or programs with clients or programs that generate comparable revenue and profits. The loss of all or part of a major client’s business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Client consolidations could result in a loss of clients or contract concessions that would adversely affect our operating results

 

We serve clients in targeted industries that have historically experienced a significant level of consolidation. If one of our clients is acquired by another company (including another one of our clients), provisions in certain of our contracts allow these clients to cancel or renegotiate their contracts, or to seek contract concessions. Such consolidations may result in the termination or phasing out of an existing client contract, volume discounts and other contract concessions that could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client and customer data could expose us to protracted and costly litigation, penalties and cause us to lose clients

 

We are dependent on IT networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic information and to communicate among our locations around the world and with our alliance partners and clients. Security breaches of this infrastructure could lead to shutdowns or disruptions of our systems and potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. We are also required at times to manage, utilize and store sensitive or confidential client or customer data. As a result, we are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations designed to protect this information, such as the European Union Directive on Data Protection and various U.S. federal and state laws governing the protection of health or other individually identifiable information. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to such data or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer data, whether through systems failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients. Similarly, unauthorized access to or through our information systems or those we develop for our clients, whether by our employees or third parties, could result in negative publicity, legal liability and damage to our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Our financial results depend on our capacity utilization, in particular our ability to forecast our clients’ customer demand and make corresponding decisions regarding staffing levels, investments and operating expenses

 

Our delivery center utilization rates have a substantial and direct effect on our profitability, and we may not achieve desired utilization rates. Our utilization rates are affected by a number of factors, including:

 

 

We attempt to maximize utilization. However, because the majority of our business is inbound from our clients’ customer-initiated encounters, we have significantly higher utilization during peak (weekday) periods than during off-peak (night and weekend) periods. We have experienced periods of idle capacity, particularly in our multi-client delivery centers. Historically, we experience idle peak period capacity upon opening a new delivery center or termination or completion of a large client program. On a quarterly basis, we assess the expected long-term capacity utilization of our delivery centers. We may consolidate or close under-performing delivery centers in order to maintain or improve targeted utilization and margins. In the event we close delivery centers in the future, we may be required to record restructuring or impairment charges, which could adversely impact our results of operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve or maintain desired delivery center capacity utilization. As a result of the fixed costs associated with each delivery center, quarterly variations in client volumes, many of which are outside our control, can have a material adverse effect on our utilization rates. If our utilization rates are below expectations in any given quarter, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for that quarter could be adversely affected.

 

Our business depends on uninterrupted service to clients

 

Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our facilities, computer and telecommunications equipment and software systems against damage or interruption from fire, power loss, terrorist or cyber

attacks, sabotage, telecommunications interruption or failure, labor shortages, weather conditions, natural disasters and other similar events. Additionally, severe weather can cause our employees to miss work and interrupt the delivery of our services, resulting in a loss of revenue. In the event we experience a temporary or permanent interruption at one or more of our locations (including our corporate headquarters building), our business could be materially adversely affected and we may be required to pay contractual damages or face the suspension or loss of a client’s business. Although we maintain property and business interruption insurance, such insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses we may incur.

 

Many of our contracts utilize performance pricing that link some of our fees to the attainment of various performance or business targets, which could increase the variability of our revenue and operating margin

 

A majority of our contracts include performance clauses that condition some of our fees on the achievement of agreed-upon performance standards or milestones. These performance standards can be complex and often depend in some measure on our clients’ actual levels of business activity or other factors outside of our control. If we fail to satisfy these measures, it could reduce our revenue under the contracts or subject us to potential damage claims under the contract terms.

 

Our contracts provide for early termination, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results

 

Most of our contracts do not ensure that we will generate a minimum level of revenue and the profitability of each client program may fluctuate, sometimes significantly, throughout the various stages of a program. Our objective is to sign multi-year contracts with our clients. However, our contracts generally enable the clients to terminate the contract or reduce customer interaction volumes. Our larger contracts generally require the client to pay a contractually agreed amount and/or provide prior notice in the event of early termination. There can be no assurance that we will be able to collect early termination fees.

 

We may not be able to offset increased costs with increased service fees under long-term contracts

 

Some of our larger long-term contracts allow us to increase our service fees if and to the extent certain cost or price indices increase. The majority of our expenses are payroll and payroll-related, which includes healthcare costs. Over the past several years, payroll costs, including healthcare costs, have increased at a rate much greater than that of general cost or price indices. Increases in our service fees that are based upon increases in cost or price indices may not fully compensate us for increases in labor and other costs incurred in providing services. There can be no assurance that we will be able to recover increases in our costs through increased service fees.

 

Our business may be affected by our ability to obtain financing

 

From time to time, we may need to obtain debt or equity financing for capital expenditures, stock repurchases, payment of existing obligations, replenishment of cash reserves, acquisitions or joint ventures. Additionally, our existing credit facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing, or that any such financing would be on terms acceptable to us. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to meet the financial covenants under our debt agreements or, in the event of noncompliance, will be able to obtain waivers or amendments from the lenders.

 

Our business may be affected by risks associated with international operations and expansion

 

An important component of our growth strategy is continued international expansion. There are certain risks inherent with conducting international business, including but not limited to:

 

 

 

Any one or more of these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our international operations and, consequently, on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our international operations successfully.

 

Our financial results may be impacted by foreign currency exchange risk

 

We serve an increasing number of our clients from delivery centers in other countries that include Argentina, Canada, Costa Rica, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines and South Africa. Contracts with these clients are typically priced, invoiced, and paid in U.S. dollars while the costs incurred to operate these delivery centers are denominated in the functional currency of the applicable non-U.S.-based operating subsidiary. Therefore, fluctuations between the currencies of the contracting and operating subsidiary present foreign currency exchange risks. In addition, because our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars, and approximately 30% of our revenue is derived from contracts denominated in other currencies, our results of operations and revenue could be adversely affected if the U.S. dollar strengthens significantly against foreign currencies.

 

While we enter into forward and option contracts to hedge against the effect of exchange rate fluctuations, the foreign exchange exposure between the contracting and operating subsidiaries is not hedged 100%. Since the operating subsidiary assumes the foreign exchange exposure, its operating margins could decrease if the contracting subsidiary’s currency devalues against the operating subsidiary’s currency.

 

For example, our operating subsidiaries are at risk if the U.S. dollar weakens. If the U.S. dollar devalues, the financial results of certain operating subsidiaries and TeleTech (upon consolidation) will be negatively affected. While our hedging strategy effectively offsets a portion of these foreign currency changes, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to successfully hedge this foreign currency exchange risk or that the value of the U.S. dollar will not materially weaken. If we fail to manage our foreign currency exchange risk, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

Our global operations expose us to numerous and sometimes conflicting legal and regulatory requirements

 

Because we provide services to clients in 50 countries, we are subject to numerous, and sometimes conflicting, legal regimes on matters as diverse as import/export controls, content requirements, trade restrictions, tariffs, taxation, sanctions, government affairs, immigration, internal and disclosure control obligations, data privacy and labor relations. Violations of these regulations could result in liability for monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution, unfavorable publicity, restrictions on our ability to process information and allegations by our clients that we have not performed our contractual obligations. Due to the varying degrees of development of the legal systems of the countries in which we operate, local laws might be insufficient to protect our contractual and intellectual property rights, among other rights.

 

Changes in U.S. federal, state and international laws and regulations may adversely affect the sale of our services, including expansion of overseas operations. In the U.S., some of our services must comply with

various federal and state regulations regarding the method of placing outbound telephone calls. In addition, we could incur liability for failure to comply with laws or regulations related to the portions of our clients’ businesses that are transferred to us. Changes in these regulations and requirements, or new restrictive regulations and requirements, may slow the growth of our services or require us to incur substantial costs. Changes in laws and regulations could also mandate significant and costly changes to the way we implement our services and solutions, such as preventing us from using offshore resources to provide our services, or could impose additional taxes on the provision of our services and solutions. These changes could threaten our ability to continue to serve certain markets.

 

Our financial results and projections may be impacted by our ability to maintain and find new locations for our delivery centers in countries with stable wage rates

 

Our industry is labor-intensive and the majority of our operating costs relate to wages, employee benefits and employment taxes. As a result, our future growth is dependent upon our ability to find cost-effective locations in which to operate, both domestically and internationally. Some of our delivery centers are located in countries that have experienced rising standards of living, which may in turn require us to increase employee wages. In addition, approximately 14,800 employees outside the U.S. are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Although we anticipate that the terms of agreements will not impact us in a manner materially different than other companies located in these countries, we may not be able to pass increased labor costs on to our clients. There is no assurance that we will be able to find cost-effective locations. Any increases in labor costs may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

The business process outsourcing markets are highly competitive, and we might not be able to compete effectively

 

Our ability to compete will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to:

 

 

Moreover, we compete with a variety of companies with respect to our offerings, including:

 

 

Because our primary competitors are the in-house operations of existing or potential clients, our performance and growth could be adversely affected if our existing or potential clients decide to provide in-house business process services they currently outsource, or retain or increase their in-house business processing services and product support capabilities. In addition, competitive pressures from current or future competitors also could cause our services to lose market acceptance or put downward pressure on the prices we charge for our services and on our operating margins. If we are unable to provide our clients with superior services and solutions at competitive prices, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to develop our services and solutions in response to changes in technology and client demand

 

Our success depends on our ability to develop and implement systems technology and outsourcing services and solutions that anticipate and respond to rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry developments and client needs. Our continued growth and future profitability will be highly dependent on a number of factors, including our ability to develop new technologies that:

 

 

We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments on a timely basis. Our integration of new technologies may not achieve their intended cost reductions and services and technologies offered by current or future competitors may make our service offerings uncompetitive or obsolete. Our failure to maintain our technological capabilities or to respond effectively to technological changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

If we fail to recruit, hire, train and retain key executives or qualified employees, our business will be adversely affected

 

Our business is labor intensive and places significant importance on our ability to recruit, train, and retain qualified personnel. We generally experience high employee turnover and are continuously required to recruit and train replacement personnel as a result of a changing and expanding work force. Demand for qualified technical professionals conversant in multiple languages, including English, and/or certain technologies may exceed supply, as new and additional skills are required to keep pace with evolving technologies. In addition, certain delivery centers are located in geographic areas with relatively low unemployment rates, which could make it more costly to hire qualified personnel. Our ability to locate and train employees is critical to achieving our growth objective. Our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel or an increase in wages or other costs of attracting, training, or retaining qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Our success is also dependent upon the efforts, direction and guidance of our executive management team. Although members of our executive team are subject to non-competition agreements, they can terminate their employment at any time. The loss of any member of our senior management team could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and growth potential.

 

If we fail to integrate businesses and assets that we may acquire through joint ventures or acquisitions, we may lose clients and our liquidity, capital resources and profitability may be adversely affected

 

We may pursue joint ventures or strategic acquisitions of companies with services, technologies, industry specializations, or geographic coverage that extend or complement our existing business. Acquisitions and joint ventures often involve a number of special risks, including the following:

 

 

 

We may pursue strategic alliances in the form of joint ventures and partnerships, which involve many of the same risks as acquisitions as well as additional risks associated with possible lack of control if we do not have a majority ownership position. Any of the factors identified above could have a material adverse effect on our business and on the market value of our common stock.

 

In addition, negotiation of potential acquisitions and the resulting integration of acquired businesses, products, or technologies, could divert management’s time and resources. Future acquisitions could cause us to issue dilutive equity or incur debt, contingent liabilities, additional amortization charges from intangible assets, asset impairment charges, or write-off charges for in-process research and development and other indefinite-lived intangible assets that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

 

The market price for our common stock may be volatile

 

The trading price of our common stock has been volatile and may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other factors, the following:

 

 

In addition, the stock market in general, the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the market for BPO providers in particular have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially and adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating performance.

 

You may suffer significant dilution as a result of our outstanding stock options and our equity incentive programs

 

We have adopted benefit plans for the compensation of our employees and directors under which restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and options to purchase our common stock have been and will continue to be granted. Options to purchase approximately 4.2 million shares of our common stock were outstanding

at December 31, 2008, of which approximately 3.5 million shares were exercisable. RSUs representing approximately 2.6 million shares were outstanding at December 31, 2008, all of which were unvested. The large number of shares issuable upon exercise of our options and other equity incentive grants could have a significant depressing effect on the market price of our stock and cause dilution to the earnings per share of our common stock.

 

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has practical control over all matters requiring action by our stockholders

 

Kenneth D. Tuchman, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns approximately 49.4% of our common stock. As a result, Mr. Tuchman has practical control over all matters requiring action by our stockholders, including the election of our entire Board of Directors. It is unlikely that a change in control of our company could be effected without his approval.

 

We and certain of our officers and directors have been named as parties to class action and related lawsuits relating to our historical equity-based compensation practices and resulting restatements, and additional lawsuits may be filed in the future

 

In connection with our historical equity-based compensation practices and resulting restatements, a securities class action lawsuit and a shareholder derivative lawsuit were filed against the Company, certain of our current directors and officers and others. There may be additional lawsuits of this nature filed in the future. We cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, nor can we predict the amount of time and expense that will be required to resolve these lawsuits. Although we expect the majority of expenses related to the lawsuits to be covered by insurance, there can be no assurance that all such expenses will be reimbursed.

 

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

We have received no written comments regarding our periodic or current reports from the staff of the SEC that were issued 180 days or more preceding the end of our 2008 fiscal year that remain unresolved.

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

Our corporate headquarters are located in Englewood, Colorado, which consists of approximately 264,000 square feet of office space.

 

As of December 31, 2008, excluding delivery centers we have exited, we operated 83 delivery centers that are classified as follows:

 

 

As of December 31, 2008, our delivery centers were located in the following countries:

 

 

The leases for all of our delivery centers have remaining terms ranging from one to 12 years and generally contain renewal options. We believe that our existing delivery centers are suitable and adequate for our current operations, and we have plans to build additional centers to accommodate future business.

 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, we have been involved in claims and lawsuits, both as plaintiff and defendant, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Accruals for claims or lawsuits have been provided for to the extent that losses are deemed both probable and estimable. Although the ultimate outcome of these claims or lawsuits cannot be ascertained, on the basis of present information and advice received from counsel, we believe that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims or lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

 

Securities Class Action

 

On January 25, 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Beasley v. TeleTech Holdings, Inc., et al. against TeleTech, certain current directors and officers and others alleging violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The complaint alleges, among other things, false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus in connection with (i) a March 2007 secondary offering of common stock and (ii) various disclosures made and periodic reports filed by us between February 8, 2007 and November 8, 2007. On February 25, 2008, a second nearly identical class action complaint, entitled Brown v. TeleTech Holdings, Inc., et al., was filed in the same court. On May 19, 2008, the actions described above were consolidated under the caption In re: TeleTech Litigation and lead plaintiff and lead counsel were approved. TeleTech and the other individual defendants intend to defend this case vigorously. Although we expect the majority of expenses related to the class action lawsuit to be covered by insurance, there can be no assurance that all of such expenses will be reimbursed.

 

Derivative Action

 

On July 28, 2008, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Court of Chancery, State of Delaware, entitled Susan M. Gregory v. Kenneth D. Tuchman, et al. , against certain of TeleTech’s former and current

officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and were unjustly enriched in connection with: (i) equity grants made in excess of plan limits; and (ii) manipulating the grant dates of stock option grants from 1999 through 2008. TeleTech is named solely as a nominal defendant against whom no recovery is sought. Although we expect the majority of expenses related to the shareholder derivative action to be covered by insurance, there can be no assurance that all such expenses will be reimbursed.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.

PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “TTEC.” The following table sets fourth the range of the high and low sales prices per share of the common stock for the quarters indicated as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:

 

 

As of December 31, 2008 we had approximately 562 holders of record of our common stock. We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock and we do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.

 

Stock Repurchase Program

 

In November 2001, the Board of Directors (“Board”) authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $5.0 million of our common stock with the objective of increasing stockholder returns. The Board has since periodically authorized additional increases in the program. The most recent Board authorization to purchase additional common stock occurred in July 2008, whereby the program allowance was increased by approximately $47.4 million to $100.0 million. Since inception of the program through December 31, 2008, the Board has authorized the repurchase of shares up to a value of $262.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we purchased 6.5 million shares for $89.6 million. Since inception of the program, we have purchased 21.3 million shares for $251.9 million. As of December 31, 2008, remaining allowance under the program was approximately $10.4 million. In February 2009, the Board authorized an increase of $25.0 million in the funding available for share repurchases. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date.

 

 

 

Stock Performance Graph

 

The graph depicted below compares the performance of TeleTech common stock with the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index; the Russell 2000 Index; and two customized peer groups over the period beginning on December 31, 2003 and ending on December 31, 2008. The “Old Peer Group,” which we initially formulated in 2002, is composed of APAC Customer Services Inc. (NASDAQ: APAC), Convergys Corporation (NYSE: CVG), Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYKE) and, in prior years, also included Electronic Data Systems Corporation, Sitel Corporation and West Corporation. The latter three companies are not included in the Old Peer Group because their common stock is no longer publicly traded. In part because the number of companies in the Old Peer Group has dwindled, we have chosen a “New Peer Group” composed of Convergys Corporation (NYSE: CVG), Genpact Limited (NYSE: G), Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYKE) and Teleperformance (NYSE Euronext: RCF). We also believe that the companies in the New Peer Group are more relevant to our current business model, market capitalization and position in the overall BPO industry.

 

The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2003 in our common stock and in each comparison index, and that all dividends were reinvested. We have not declared any dividends on our common stock. Stock price performance shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

 

 

 

*$100 invested on 12/31/03 in stock & index-including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.

 

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K (amounts in thousands except share amounts).

 

 

 

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Executive Summary

 

TeleTech is one of the largest and most geographically diverse global providers of business process outsourcing solutions. We have a 27-year history of designing, implementing and managing critical business processes for Global 1000 companies to help them improve their customers’ experience, expand their strategic capabilities and increase their operating efficiencies. By delivering a high-quality customer experience through the effective integration of customer-facing, front-office processes with internal back-office processes, we enable our clients to better serve, grow and retain their customer base. We have developed deep vertical industry expertise and support approximately 250 business process outsourcing programs serving 100 global clients in the automotive, broadband, cable, financial services, government, healthcare, logistics, media and entertainment, retail, technology, travel, wireline and wireless communication industries.

 

As globalization of the world’s economy continues to accelerate, businesses are increasingly competing on a large-scale basis due to rapid advances in technology and telecommunications that permit cost-effective real-time global communications and ready access to a highly-skilled worldwide labor force. As a result of these developments, companies have increasingly outsourced business processes to third-party providers in an effort to enhance or maintain their competitive position while increasing shareholder value through improved productivity and profitability.

 

We believe that our revenue will continue to grow over the long-term as global demand for our services is fueled by the following trends:

 

 

 

Our Strategy

 

Our objective is to become the world’s largest, most technologically advanced and innovative provider of onshore, offshore and work from home BPO solutions. Companies within the Global 1000 are our primary client targets due to their size, global nature, focus on outsourcing and desire for the global, scalable integrated process solutions that we offer. We have developed, and continue to invest in, a broad set of capabilities designed to serve this growing client need. These investments include our TeleTech@Home offering which allows our employees to serve clients from their home. This capability has enhanced the flexibility of our offering allowing clients to choose our onshore, offshore or work from home employees to meet their outsourced business process needs. In addition we have begun to offer ‘hosted services’ where clients can license any aspect of our global network and proprietary applications. While the revenue from these offerings is small relative to our consolidated revenue, we believe it will continue to grow as these services become more widely adopted by our clients. We aim to further improve our competitive position by investing in a growing suite of new and innovative business process services across our targeted industries.

 

Our business strategy to increase revenue, profitability and our industry position includes the following elements:

 

 

Our 2008 Financial Results

 

In 2008, our revenue grew 2.2% over 2007 to $1,400 million. Our income from operations grew 33.2% to $109.0 million or 7.8% of revenue in 2008 from $81.8 million or 6.0% of revenue in 2007. Income from operations in 2008 included $8.1 million of asset impairment and restructuring charges and $14.6 million of selling, general and administrative charges associated with our equity-based compensation review, financial restatement and related lawsuits. Excluding both of these charges, which totaled $22.7 million, our income from operations in 2008 increased 13.3% to $131.7 million or 9.4% of revenue from $116.2 million or 8.5% of revenue in 2007 excluding $11.5 million of charges associated with our equity-based compensation review and financial restatement and $22.9 million of asset impairment and restructuring charges.

 

Our improved revenue and operating margin resulted from growth with both new and existing clients across an expanding array of industry verticals, increased utilization of our delivery centers across a 24-hour period, leveraging our global purchasing power and continued expansion of services from our geographically diverse delivery centers.

 

We have experienced growth in our offshore delivery centers, which primarily serve clients located in other countries. Our offshore delivery capacity now spans seven countries and 25,913 workstations and currently represents 65% of our global delivery capabilities. Revenue in these offshore locations grew 14% in 2008 to $628 million and represented 45% of our total revenue. To meet continued client demand in 2008, we added 5,700 gross workstations primarily in offshore locations including the Philippines, South Africa and Latin America. While historically it was primarily US-based clients that were willing to utilize our offshore delivery capabilities, we have increasingly seen clients in Europe and Asia Pacific willing to utilize our offshore delivery capabilities and expect this trend to continue with clients in other countries. In light of this trend, we plan to continue to selectively expand into new offshore markets. For example, we believe we are one of the first multi-national BPO providers to enter the African continent. As we grow our offshore delivery capabilities and our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations increase, we continue to actively manage this risk via a multi-currency hedging program designed to minimize operating margin volatility.

 

Our strong financial position due to our cash flow from operations and low debt levels allowed us to finance a significant portion of our capital needs and stock repurchases through internally generated cash flows. At December 31, 2008, we had $87.9 million of cash and cash equivalents and a total debt to equity ratio of 25.0%. During 2008, we repurchased $89.6 million of our common stock and since inception of the share repurchase program in 2001 have acquired $251.9 million, or 21.3 million shares, of our outstanding stock.

 

We have incurred substantial expenses for accounting, legal, tax and other professional services in connection with the Audit Committee’s and our internal review of historical, equity-based compensation practices (the “Review”), as well as preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements and restated Consolidated Financial Statements. These third-party expenses, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses, were $12.8 million and $8.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In addition, in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 we recorded additional compensation expense of $1.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, including amounts for incremental federal, state and employment taxes, assessed upon employees under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, including penalties, interest and tax “gross-ups.” We have committed to make our employees whole for any adverse tax consequences arising as a result of the vesting or exercise of mispriced options identified through the Review.

 

Business Overview

 

We serve our clients through the primary business of BPO services. Our BPO business provides outsourced business process and customer management services for a variety of industries through global delivery centers. When we begin operations in a new country, we determine whether the country is intended to primarily serve U.S. based clients, in which case we include the country in our North American

BPO segment, or if the country is intended to serve both domestic clients from that country and U.S. based clients, in which case we include the country in our International BPO segment. This is consistent with our management of the business, internal financial reporting structure and operating focus. Operations for each segment of our BPO business are conducted in the following countries:

 

 

On December 18, 2007, we completed the sale of Customer Solutions Mauritius, an indirect subsidiary that owned a 60% interest in our TeleTech Services India Ltd. joint venture and generated less than 1% of our revenue in 2007. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this disposition.

 

On September 27, 2007, Newgen Results Corporation and related companies (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Newgen”) and TeleTech entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities associated with our Database Marketing and Consulting business. The transaction was completed on September 28, 2007. This business, which only represented 1% of our revenue in 2007, provided outsourced database management, direct marketing and related customer acquisitions and retention services for automobile dealerships and manufacturers in North America. During 2007, our income from operations was reduced by $20.4 million related to asset impairment and restructuring charges for this business. During 2007, our income from operations before income taxes and minority interest was reduced by $24.3 million. This includes the $20.4 million of asset impairment and restructuring charges discussed above along with a $3.9 million net charge related to the above disposal. The disposal charge includes a loss on the sale of assets of $6.1 million partially offset by software license income of $2.2 million recorded in Other, net. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the impairment charges and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this disposition. On December 22, 2008, as discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Newgen Results Corporation, filed a voluntary petition for liquidation under Chapter 7 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Accordingly, we deconsolidated Newgen Results Corporation as of December 22, 2008.

 

See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding our preparation of segment information.

 

BPO Services

 

The BPO business generates revenue based primarily on the amount of time our associates devote to a client’s program. We primarily focus on large global corporations in the following industries: automotive, cable and communications, financial services, healthcare, logistics, media and entertainment, retail, technology, travel and wireline and wireless telecommunications. Revenue is recognized as services are

provided. The majority of our revenue is from multi-year contracts and we expect that trend to continue. However, we do provide certain client programs on a short-term basis.

 

We have historically experienced annual attrition of existing client programs of approximately 6% to 10% of our revenue. Attrition of existing client programs during 2008 and 2007 was 6% and 7%, respectively.

 

The BPO industry is highly competitive. We compete primarily with the in-house business processing operations of our current and potential clients. We also compete with certain companies that provide BPO on an outsourced basis. Our ability to sell our existing services or gain acceptance for new products or services is challenged by the competitive nature of the industry. There can be no assurance that we will be able to sell services to new clients, renew relationships with existing clients, or gain client acceptance of our new products.

 

We have improved our revenue and profitability in both the North American and the International BPO segments by:

 

 

 

 

Our ability to renew or enter into new multi-year contracts, particularly large complex opportunities, is dependent upon the macroeconomic environment in general and the specific industry environments in which our clients operate. A weakening of the U.S. or the global economy could lengthen sales cycles or cause delays in closing new business opportunities.

 

Our potential clients typically obtain bids from multiple vendors and evaluate many factors in selecting a service provider, including, among other factors, the scope of services offered, the service record of the vendor and price. We generally price our bids with a long-term view of profitability and, accordingly, we consider all of our fixed and variable costs in developing our bids. We believe that our competitors, at times, may bid business based upon a short-term view, as opposed to our longer-term view, resulting in a lower price bid. While we believe our clients’ perceptions of the value we provide results in our being successful in certain competitive bid situations, there are often situations where a potential client may prefer a lower cost.

 

Our industry is labor-intensive and the majority of our operating costs relate to wages, employee benefits and employment taxes. An improvement in the local or global economies where our delivery centers are located could lead to increased labor-related costs. In addition, our industry experiences high personnel turnover, and the length of training time required to implement new programs continues to increase due to

increased complexities of our clients’ businesses. This may create challenges if we obtain several significant new clients or implement several new, large-scale programs and need to recruit, hire and train qualified personnel at an accelerated rate.

 

As discussed above, to some extent our profitability is influenced by the number of new client programs entered into within the period. For new programs we defer revenue related to initial training (“Training Revenue”) when training is billed as a separate component from production rates. Consequently, the corresponding training costs associated with this revenue, consisting primarily of labor and related expenses (“Training Costs”), are also deferred. In these circumstances, both the Training Revenue and Training Costs are amortized straight-line over the life of the contract. In situations where Training Revenue is not billed separately, but rather included in the production rates, there is no deferral as all revenue is recognized over the life of the contract and the associated training expenses are expensed as incurred.

 

Deferred Training Revenue increased $2.6 million in 2008 to $15.3 million from $12.7 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Correspondingly, Deferred Training Costs increased $1.3 million in 2008 to $6.6 million from $5.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in these deferrals was due to growth in new client programs where training was billed separately during the period. As of December 31, 2008, we had Deferred Training Revenue, net of Deferred Training Costs, of $8.7 million that will be recognized into our income from operations over the remaining life of the corresponding contracts (approximately 14 months). See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of deferred training revenue.

 

We may have difficulties managing the timeliness of launching new or expanded client programs and the associated internal allocation of personnel and resources. This could cause slower than anticipated revenue growth and/or higher than expected costs primarily related to hiring, training and retaining the required workforce, either of which could adversely affect our operating results.

 

Quarterly, we review our capacity utilization and projected demand for future capacity. In conjunction with these reviews, we may decide to consolidate or close under-performing delivery centers, including those impacted by the loss of a major client program, in order to maintain or improve targeted utilization and margins. In addition, because clients may request that we serve their customers from international delivery centers with lower prevailing labor rates, in the future we may decide to close one or more of our delivery centers, even though it is generating positive cash flow, because we believe the future profits from conducting such work outside the current delivery center may more than compensate for the one-time charges related to closing the facility.

 

Our profitability is influenced by our ability to increase capacity utilization in our delivery centers. We attempt to minimize the financial impact resulting from idle capacity when planning the development and opening of new delivery centers or the expansion of existing delivery centers. As such, management considers numerous factors that affect capacity utilization, including anticipated expirations, reductions, terminations, or expansions of existing programs and the potential size and timing of new client contracts that we expect to obtain. As a result, we expanded our capacity in 2008 by approximately 5,700 gross workstations in primarily offshore locations including the Philippines, South Africa and Latin America. Concurrent with these increases, we also reduced our capacity in 2008 by approximately 3,200 workstations in North America, Asia Pacific, Spain and Mexico as we continue to rationalize our capacity based on client demand.

 

To respond more rapidly to changing market demands, to implement new programs and to expand existing programs, we may be required to commit to additional capacity prior to the contracting of additional business, which may result in idle capacity. This is largely due to the significant time required to negotiate and execute a client contract as we concentrate our marketing efforts toward obtaining large, complex BPO programs.

 

We internally target capacity utilization in our delivery centers at 80% to 90% of our available workstations. As of December 31, 2008, the overall capacity utilization in our Multi-Client Centers

was 71% and is lower than the prior year due to softness of existing client volumes in light of the weakening economic environment. The table below presents workstation data for our multi-client centers as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. Dedicated and Managed Centers (9,048 and 10,055 workstations, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively) are excluded from the workstation data as unused workstations in these facilities are not available for sale. Our utilization percentage is defined as the total number of utilized production workstations compared to the total number of available production workstations. We may change the designation of shared or dedicated centers based on the normal changes in our business environment and client needs.

 

 

Database Marketing and Consulting

 

On September 27, 2007, Newgen and TeleTech entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities associated with our Database Marketing and Consulting business. As a result of the transaction which was completed on September 28, 2007, Newgen received $3.2 million in cash and recorded a loss on disposal of $6.1 million. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this disposition.

 

The revenue from this business was generated utilizing a database and contact system to promote the sales and service business of automobile dealership customers using targeted marketing solutions through the phone, mail, email, and the Web. This business generated a loss from operations of approximately $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

Concurrent with the sale, we entered into an agreement with the buyer of our Database Marketing and Consulting business to provide ongoing BPO services to that segment that were previously being performed by us. We reviewed the direct cash flows associated with this agreement and compared them to our estimates of the revenue associated with the Database Marketing and Consulting business. We concluded that these direct cash flows were significant. As a result, the operations included in the Database Marketing and Consulting business did not meet the criteria under Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144 A ccounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”) and therefore was not classified as discontinued operations.

 

Prior to the sale and as a result of the business’ continued losses, during June 2007, we determined that it was “more-likely-than-not” that we would dispose of our Database Marketing and Consulting business. This triggered impairment testing on an interim basis for this segment under the guidance of SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”) as discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, the Database, Marketing and Consulting business recorded an impairment loss of $13.4 million during the second quarter of 2007 to reduce the carrying value of their goodwill to zero.

On December 22, 2008, as discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Newgen Results Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a voluntary petition for liquidation under Chapter 7 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Under Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements , a consolidation of a majority-owned subsidiary is precluded where control does not rest with the majority owners. Accordingly, the Company deconsolidated Newgen Results Corporation as of December 22, 2008.

 

Overall

 

As shown in the “Results of Operations” section which follows later, we have improved income from operations for our North American and International BPO segments. The increases are attributable to a variety of factors such as expansion of work on certain client programs, transitioning work on certain client programs to lower cost operating centers, improving individual client program profit margins and/or eliminating underperforming programs and our multi – phased cost reduction plan.

 

As we pursue acquisition opportunities, it is possible that the contemplated benefits of any future acquisitions may not materialize within the expected time periods or to the extent anticipated. Critical to the success of our acquisition strategy is the orderly, effective integration of acquired businesses into our organization. If this integration is unsuccessful, our business may be adversely impacted. There is also the risk that our valuation assumptions and models for an acquisition may be overly optimistic or incorrect.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We regularly review our estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions, which are based upon historical experience and on various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Reported amounts and disclosures may have been different had management used different estimates and assumptions or if different conditions had occurred in the periods presented. Below is a discussion of the policies that we believe may involve a high degree of judgment and complexity.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

For each client arrangement, we determine whether evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of our service has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. If all criteria are met, we recognize revenue at the time services are performed. If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are met.

 

Our BPO segments recognize revenue under three models:

 

Production Rate  – Revenue is recognized based on the billable time or transactions of each associate, as defined in the client contract. The rate per billable time or transaction is based on a pre-determined contractual rate. This contractual rate can fluctuate based on our performance against certain pre-determined criteria related to quality and performance.

 

Performance - based  – Under performance-based arrangements, we are paid by our clients based on the achievement of certain levels of sales or other client-determined criteria specified in the client contract. We recognize performance-based revenue by measuring our actual results against the performance criteria specified in the contracts. Amounts collected from clients prior to the performance of services are recorded as deferred revenue, which is recorded in Other short-term liabilities or Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Hybrid  – Hybrid models include production rate and performance-based elements. For these types of arrangements, we allocate revenue to the elements based on the relative fair value of each element. Revenue for each element is recognized based on the methods described above.

 

Certain client programs provide for adjustments to monthly billings based upon whether we meet or exceed certain performance criteria as set forth in the contract. Increases or decreases to monthly billings arising from such contract terms are reflected in revenue as earned or incurred.

 

Periodically we make certain expenditures related to acquiring contracts, or providing up front discounts for future services to existing customers (recorded as Contract Acquisition Costs in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets). Those expenditures are capitalized and amortized in proportion to the expected future revenue from the contract, which in most cases results in straight-line amortization over the life of the contract. Amortization of these amounts are recorded as a reduction of revenue.

 

Income Taxes

 

We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS 109”), which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of transactions that have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. When circumstances warrant, we assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be recovered from future projected taxable income.

 

As required by SFAS 109, we continually review the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized in future tax periods under the “more-likely-than-not” criteria. In making this judgment, SFAS 109 requires that all available evidence, both positive and negative, should be considered to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is required.

 

The Financial Accounting Standards Board recently issued Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of SFAS 109. FIN 48 was effective for our 2007 year. FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS 109. The first step is to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on audit. The second step is to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority. We evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on the consideration of several factors including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in applicable tax law, and settlement of issues under audit. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in Provision for Income Taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note 1 and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the impact FIN 48 has had on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

We have established an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable. Each quarter, management reviews the receivables on an account-by-account basis and assigns a probability of collection. Management’s judgment is used in assessing the probability of collection. Factors considered in making this judgment include, among other things, the age of the identified receivable, client financial condition, previous client payment history and any recent communications with the client.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company evaluates the carrying value of property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carry amount may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS 144. An asset is considered to be impaired when the anticipated undiscounted future cash

flows of an asset group are estimated to be less than its carrying value. The amount of impairment recognized is the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and its fair value. Fair value estimates are based on assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates.

 

Goodwill

 

We assess the realizability of goodwill annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it may be impaired. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The impairment, if any, is measured based on the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. We aggregate segment components with similar economic characteristics in forming a reporting unit; aggregation can be based on types of customers, methods of distribution of services, shared operations, acquisition history, and management judgment and reporting.

 

We estimate fair value using discounted cash flows of the reporting units. The most significant assumptions used in these analyses are those made in estimating future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we use financial assumptions in our internal forecasting model such as projected capacity utilization, projected changes in the prices we charge for our services, projected labor costs, as well as contract negotiation status. The projected revenue average growth rates of our reporting units ranged from a revenue decline of (14%) to a revenue growth of 6% per annum over a three year period. The financial and credit market volatility directly impacts our fair value measurement through our weighted average cost of capital that we use to determine our discount rate. We use a discount rate we consider appropriate for the country where the business unit is providing services. Based on the analyses performed in the fourth quarter of 2008, there was no impairment to the December 31, 2008 goodwill balances of our reporting units. If actual results are less than the assumptions used in performing the impairment test, the fair value of the reporting units may be significantly lower, causing the carrying value to exceed the fair value and indicating an impairment has occurred. However, a decrease of 8-10% in the estimated fair value of any of our reporting units at December 31, 2008 would not have resulted in a goodwill impairment charge.

 

Restructuring Liability

 

We routinely assess the profitability and utilization of our delivery centers and existing markets. In some cases, we have chosen to close under-performing delivery centers and complete reductions in workforce to enhance future profitability. We follow SFAS No. 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”), which specifies that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred, rather than upon commitment to a plan.

 

A significant assumption used in determining the amount of the estimated liability for closing delivery centers is the estimated liability for future lease payments on vacant centers, which we determine based on our ability to successfully negotiate early termination agreements with landlords and/or our ability to sublease the facility. If our assumptions regarding early termination and the timing and amounts of sublease payments prove to be inaccurate, we may be required to record additional losses, or conversely, a reversal of previously reported losses.

 

Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and Equity-Based Compensation Expense

 

During the first quarter of 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) Accounting for Share Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”) applying the modified prospective method. SFAS 123(R) requires all equity-based payments to employees to be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) based on the grant date fair value of the award. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for equity-based awards under the intrinsic value method, which followed recognition and measurement principles of APB 25 and related interpretations, and equity-based compensation was included as pro-forma disclosure within the notes to the financial statements. We did not modify the terms of any previously granted options in anticipation of the adoption of SFAS 123(R).

In accordance with SFAS 123(R), we are required to estimate a forfeiture rate related to pre-vested equity awards based on historical forfeitures. Stock-based compensation expense is adjusted once an equity award cancels or vests, which could result in a difference from what was originally recorded. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more discussion on equity-based accounting.

 

Fair Value Measurement

 

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”), which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP. As defined in SFAS 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that the Company believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about counter party credit risk, including the ability of each party to execute its obligation under the contract, and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.

 

The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company is able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.

 

SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS 157 are as follows:

 

 

Derivatives

 

We account for financial derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS 133”). We enter into foreign exchange forward and option contracts to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate

fluctuations that are associated with forecasted revenue in non-functional currencies. Upon proper qualification, these contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges, as defined by SFAS 133. We also entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge our net investment in a foreign operation.

 

All derivative financial instruments are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), a component of Stockholders’ Equity, to the extent they are deemed effective. Based on the criteria established by SFAS 133, all of our cash flow hedge contracts are deemed to be highly effective. Changes in fair value of our net investment hedge is recorded in cumulative translation adjustment in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets offsetting the change in cumulative translation adjustment attributable to the hedged portion of our net investment in the foreign operation. Any realized gains or losses resulting from the cash flow hedges are recognized together with the hedged transaction within Revenue. Gains and losses from the settlements of our net investment hedge remain in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) until partial or complete liquidation of the applicable net investment.

 

We also enter into fair value derivative contracts that hedge against translation gains and losses. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges affect the carrying value of the asset or liability hedged, with changes in both the derivative instrument and the hedged asset or liability being recognized in earnings.

 

While we expect that our derivative instruments will continue to be highly effective and in compliance with applicable guidance under SFAS 133, as amended, if our hedges did not qualify as highly effective or if we determine that forecasted transactions will not occur, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges would be reflected currently in earnings.

 

In addition to hedging activities, we also have embedded derivatives in certain foreign lease contracts. We bifurcate the embedded derivative feature from the host contract in accordance with SFAS 133, with any changes in fair value of the embedded derivatives recognized in Cost of Services.

 

Contingencies

 

We record a liability in accordance with SFAS No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies for pending litigation and claims where losses are both probable and reasonably estimable. Each quarter, management, reviews all litigation and claims on a case-by-case basis and assigns probability of loss and range of loss.

 

Explanation of Key Metrics and Other Items

 

Cost of Services

 

Cost of services principally includes costs incurred in connection with our BPO operations and database marketing services, including direct labor, telecommunications, printing, postage, sales and use tax and certain fixed costs associated with delivery centers. In addition, cost of services includes income related to grants we may receive from local or state governments as an incentive to locate delivery centers in their jurisdictions which reduce the cost of services for those facilities.

 

Selling, General and Administrative

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include costs associated with administrative services such as sales, marketing, product development, legal settlements, legal, information systems (including core technology and telephony infrastructure) and accounting and finance. It also includes equity-based compensation expense, outside professional fees (i.e. legal and accounting services), building expense for non-delivery center facilities and other items associated with general business administration.

Restructuring Charges, Net

 

Restructuring charges, net primarily include costs incurred in conjunction with reductions in force or decisions to exit facilities, including termination benefits and lease liabilities, net of expected sublease rentals.

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense includes interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with our debts and capitalized lease obligations.

 

Other Income

 

The main components of other income are miscellaneous receipts not directly related to our operating activities, such as foreign exchange transaction gains and income from the sale of a software and intellectual property license agreement.

 

Other Expenses

 

The main components of other expenses are expenditures not directly related to our operating activities, such as foreign exchange transaction losses and corporate legal settlements.

 

Presentation of Non-GAAP Measurements

 

Free Cash Flow

 

Free cash flow is a non-GAAP liquidity measurement. We believe that free cash flow is useful to our investors because it measures, during a given period, the amount of cash generated that is available for debt obligations and investments other than purchases of property, plant and equipment. Free cash flow is not a measure determined by GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for “income from operations,” “net income,” “net cash provided by operating activities,” or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. We believe this non-GAAP liquidity measure is useful, in addition to the most directly comparable GAAP measure of “net cash provided by operating activities,” because free cash flow includes investments in operational assets. Free cash flow does not represent residual cash available for discretionary expenditures, since it includes cash required for debt service. Free cash flow also excludes cash that may be necessary for acquisitions, investments and other needs that may arise.

 

The following table reconciles free cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities for our consolidated results (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

We discuss factors affecting free cash flow between periods in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section below.

 

Non-GAAP Income from Operations

 

We discuss our income from operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 excluding asset impairment and restructuring charges, and costs associated with our equity-based compensation review and financial restatement, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe this measure provides meaningful supplemental information by indentifying matters that are not indicative of core business operating results or are of a substantially non-recurring nature. A reconciliation of this non-

GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is included with the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure.

 

Non-GAAP Effective Tax Rate

 

The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is discussed using non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the effects of amounts associated with restructuring and asset impairments charges, the release of valuation allowances and reduction in our FIN 48 tax liability, gains/losses from the dispositions of assets, and changes due to certain tax planning and corporate restructuring activities. Management believes that it is helpful to exclude these effects to better understand and analyze the periods’ effective tax rate given the discrete nature of these items. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is included with the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

Revenue

 

Our strategy of continuing to increase our offshore revenue delivery resulted in an increase in our percentage of offshore revenue. Our offshore delivery capacity now represents 65% of our global delivery capabilities. Revenue in these offshore locations grew 14% in 2008 from the prior year to $628 million from $549 million, and represented 45% of our total revenue. An important component of our growth strategy is continued international expansion. Factors that may impact our ability to maintain our offshore

operating margins are potential increases in competition for the available workforce, the trend of higher occupancy costs and foreign currency fluctuations.

 

Revenue for North American BPO for 2008 compared to 2007 was $974.8 million and $955.8 million, respectively. The increase in revenue for the North American BPO was due to net expansion of client programs of $58.4 million offset by certain program terminations of $39.4 million.

 

Revenue for International BPO for 2008 compared to 2007 was $425.3 million and $396.1 million, respectively. The increase in revenue for the International BPO was due to the net expansion of client programs of $36.9 million, positive changes in foreign exchange rates causing an increase in revenue of $7.3 million, offset by certain program terminations of $15.0 million.

 

Revenue for Database Marketing and Consulting for 2008 compared to 2007 was $0.0 million and $17.7 million, respectively. Substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with this business were sold in September 2007 and therefore, no revenue was generated in 2008.

 

Cost of Services

 

Cost of services for North American BPO for 2008 compared to 2007 was $708.3 million and $689.8 million, respectively. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue in the North American BPO increased slightly compared to the prior year. In absolute dollars the increase is due to an increase of $20.0 million in employee related expenses due to implementation of new and expanded client programs and a net decrease of $1.5 million in other expenses.

 

Cost of services for International BPO for 2008 compared to 2007 was $316.0 million and $299.9 million, respectively. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue in the International BPO decreased compared to the prior year due to expanded off-shoring of certain international clients. In absolute dollars the increase is due to an increase of $7.7 million in employee related expenses due to implementation of new clients and the growth of existing clients, with approximately $4.2 million of that increase due to changes in foreign exchange rates, a $4.6 million increase in rent and telecommunications, and $3.8 million in net increases in other expenses.

 

Cost of services for Database Marketing and Consulting for 2008 compared to 2007 was $0.2 million and $11.7 million, respectively. The decrease from the prior year was due to the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with this business in September 2007.

 

Selling, General and Administrative

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses for North American BPO for 2008 compared to 2007 were $125.0 million and $126.5 million, respectively. The expenses decreased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue as a result of decreased employee related expenses of $5.9 million offset by an increase of $1.9 million of professional fees and payroll taxes associated with the equity-based compensation review and restatement of our historic financial statements and related lawsuits, and a net increase in other expenses of $2.5 million.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses for International BPO for 2008 compared to 2007 were $74.0 million and $66.7 million, respectively. The expenses increased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue as a result of an increase to employee related expenses of $3.0 million, an increase of $1.3 million of professional fees and payroll taxes associated with the equity-based compensation review and restatement of our historical financial statements and related lawsuits, and a net increase of $3.0 million in other expenses.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses for Database Marketing and Consulting for 2008 compared to 2007 were $0.4 million and $14.3 million, respectively. The decrease was due to the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with this business in September 2007.

Depreciation and Amortization

 

Depreciation and amortization expense on a consolidated basis for 2008 and 2007 was $59.2 million and $56.0 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense in both the North American BPO and International BPO as a percentage of revenue increased slightly compared to the prior year. The North American BPO included an increase in the Philippines of $5.0 million due to investment in new capacity. The International BPO included an increase for Latin America of $1.9 million and an increase for Africa of $0.6 million both due to new capacity. The Database Marketing and Consulting depreciation expense decreased by $3.9 million due to the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with this business in September 2007.

 

Restructuring Charges

 

During 2008, we recorded $6.1 million of restructuring charges compared to $7.1 million in 2007. During 2008, we undertook several restructuring activities including the closure of four North American BPO delivery centers and reductions in workforce in our International BPO segment to better align our workforce with current business needs.

 

Impairment Losses

 

During 2008, we recorded $2.0 million of impairment charges compared to $15.8 million in 2007. In 2008, these impairment charges related primarily to the closure of two North American BPO delivery centers. In 2007, this charge related primarily to the impairment of fixed assets and goodwill in our Database Marketing and Consulting business.

 

Other Income (Expense)

 

For 2008, total other income (expense) decreased by $2.1 million primarily due to an increase of interest income of $2.5 million due to higher cash and cash equivalent balances, primarily in international locations earning higher average interest rates.

 

Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate for 2008 was 26.1%. This compares to an effective tax rate of 26.0% in 2007. The 2008 effective tax rate is positively influenced by earnings in international jurisdictions currently under an income tax holiday and the distribution of income between the U.S. and international tax jurisdictions. The effective tax rate for 2008 was lower than expected due to the release of $3.9 million of valuation allowance in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States and a net reduction of $0.1 million FIN 48 tax liability. Without these items, our effective tax rate in 2008 would have been 29.9%. The effective tax rate for 2007 of 26.0% was lower than expected due to the second quarter impairment and third quarter restructuring and loss on the sale of subsidiary recorded for our Database Marketing and Consulting business as discussed in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These charges were all recorded in the U.S. tax jurisdiction and reduced income before taxes recorded in the U.S. and thereby increased the proportion of income before taxes earned in international tax jurisdictions. Finally, we realized a $2.4 million benefit related to a permanent difference in calculating the gain from disposition of our India joint venture in the fourth quarter of 2007 as discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and a $1.4 million benefit related to certain tax planning and corporate restructuring activities and the reversal of $0.9 million in deferred tax valuation allowance recorded against tax assets in prior years. Without these items, our effective tax rate in 2007 would have been 32.2%. Our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by several factors, many of which are outside of our control. Further, income taxes are subject to changing tax laws, regulations and interpretations in multiple jurisdictions, in which we operate, as well as the requirements, pronouncements and rulings of certain tax, regulatory and accounting organizations. In future years, our effective tax rate is expected to return to approximately 30% to 33%, principally because we expect our distribution of pre-tax income between the U.S. and our international tax jurisdictions to return to more typical levels seen in recent years.