Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Saia and Jevic are both subject to ordinary-course litigation arising out of personal injury, property damage, freight and employment claims. None of these legal actions separately or in the aggregate are viewed by management to be excessive compared to historical trends, nor are they expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2003.

10

PART II.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Stock Price Information

SCST’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ National Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol “SCST.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share for the common stock as reported on NASDAQ. SCST was spun-off from Yellow Corporation on September 30, 2002 and began “regular trading” on NASDAQ on October 1, 2002; therefore no additional historical quarterly information is available.

Stockholders

As of January 31, 2004, there were 2,029 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We do not pay a dividend on our common stock. Any payment of dividends in the future is dependent upon our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings, cash flow and other factors.

Dividends are prohibited under our current debt agreements, which have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference herein. However, there are no material restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. See Note 3 of the accompanying audited financial statements.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

(1)  See note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the equity compensation plan for securities remaining available for future issuance. No more than 68,500 of the amount remaining available may be issued in the form of restricted stock under the SCS Transportation, Inc. 2003 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

11

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table shows summary historical financial data of SCST, which includes its wholly owned subsidiaries Saia and Jevic, and has been derived from, and should be read together with, the financial statements and accompanying notes and in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition”. The summary financial information may not be indicative of the future performance of SCST.

12

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Executive Overview

The Company’s business is highly correlated to the industrial economy. The Company is focused on increasing volume within existing geographies while managing both the mix and yield of business to achieve increased profitability. The Company’s business is both labor intensive and capital intensive. The Company looks for opportunities to leverage technology, improve safety and achieve better asset utilization (primarily tractors and trailers) to improve cost and productivity. The Company grew year over year revenue by 7 percent in 2003 despite a flat economy as measured by Blue Chip Economic Indicators, which estimated 0.2 percent year over year growth in industrial production. Revenue growth was primarily attributable to the Company’s growth in less-than-truckload (LTL) tonnage which management believes reflects market share gains due to various sales initiatives. The LTL pricing environment remained competitive and the Company saw only modest year over year improvement in LTL revenue per hundredweight, one measure of yield.

Incremental margins from increased tonnage volume within its existing network, along with cost and productivity improvements realized in 2003, more than offset structural cost increases in wages, health insurance claims, public company costs and other expense items. This resulted in an overall improvement in the Company’s operating ratio (operating expenses divided by operating revenue) of 50 basis points to 96.0 percent in 2003.

The Company generated cash flows from operations of $58.3 million in 2003. The Company improved its financial capacity to pursue opportunistic growth strategies by increasing its cash balance to $30.9 million and availability under its revolving credit facility to $35.2 million at December 31, 2003. There was no significant change in the Company’s outstanding indebtedness during 2003.

General

The following management’s discussion and analysis describes the principal factors affecting the results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, as well as the critical accounting policies, of SCS Transportation, Inc. (also referred to as “SCST”). This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, which include additional information about our significant accounting policies, practices and the transactions that underlie our financial results.

SCST is a leading transportation company providing regional and interregional LTL and selected truckload (TL) service solutions to more than 72,000 customers across the United States. Our operating subsidiaries are Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. (Saia), based in Duluth, Georgia, and Jevic Transportation, Inc. (Jevic), based in Delanco, New Jersey. On September 30, 2002, Yellow Corporation (Yellow) completed a tax-free distribution to its shareholders of 100 percent of the outstanding common stock of SCST (the Spin-off).

Our business is highly correlated to the industrial economy and is impacted by a number of other external factors including the weather, price and availability of fuel and regulation. The key factors that affect our operating results are the volumes of shipments transported through our networks, as measured by our average daily shipments and tonnage; the prices we obtain for our services, as measured by revenue per hundredweight (yield) and revenue per shipment; our ability to manage our cost structure for capital expenditures and operating expenses such as salaries, wages and benefits, purchased transportation, claims and insurance expense, fuel and maintenance; and our ability to match operating costs to shifting volume levels.

13

Results of Operations

SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Selected Results of Operations and Operating Statistics
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in thousands, except ratios and revenue per hundredweight)

Year ended December 31, 2003 vs. year ended December 31, 2002

Revenue and volume

The 6.7 percent increase in consolidated revenue to $827.4 million was the result of volume increases in both shipments and LTL tonnage while year over year yield was relatively flat, as pricing remains very competitive. Fuel surcharge revenue, which was 3.6 percent of total revenue in 2003, is intended to reduce the Company’s exposure to rising diesel prices and was higher by approximately $14.7 million in 2003.

Saia had operating revenue of $520.7 million in 2003, an increase of 6.3 percent over 2002 operating revenue of $489.8 million. Saia’s operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge was $502.3 million in 2003, up 4.6 percent from $480.3 million in 2002. Saia LTL revenue per hundredweight excluding fuel surcharge (a measure of yield) increased 0.2 percent to $9.54 per hundredweight for 2003, while LTL tonnage was up 4.4 percent to 2.4 million

14

tons and LTL shipments were up 3.4 percent to 4.5 million shipments. The flat yield is a combination of freight mix and competitive pricing pressure in regional markets. Management believes that Saia continues to grow volume by providing high quality service for its customers and from sales initiatives in specific market segments. Saia has approximately 70 percent of revenue that is subject to individual customer price adjustment negotiations that occur intermittently throughout the year. The remaining 30 percent of revenue is subject to the annual general rate increase. On June 9, 2003, Saia implemented a 6.2 percent general rate increase for this smaller group of customers. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes impact the extent to which customer rate increases are retained over time.

Jevic had operating revenue of $306.7 million in 2003, a 7.4 percent increase over $285.6 million in 2002. Jevic’s operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge was $295.5 million in 2003, up 5.5 percent from $280.2 million in 2002. Jevic revenue per hundredweight excluding fuel surcharge increased 4.8 percent to $6.44 per hundredweight, while tonnage was down 1.2 percent to 2.2 million tons and shipments were up 4.3 percent to 1.0 million shipments. Jevic’s revenue increase is due to increased LTL volume, improved yields and increased brokerage revenue, partially offset by lower truckload volumes. The increase in yield is primarily a result of a planned mix shift toward higher yielding LTL business. Jevic has approximately 60 percent of revenue that is subject to individual customer price adjustment negotiations that occur intermittently throughout the year. The remaining 40 percent of revenue is subject to the annual general rate increase. On June 1, 2003, Jevic implemented a 5.9 percent general rate increase on LTL business and a 3.0 percent increase on truckload business for this smaller group of customers. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes impact the extent to which customer rate increases are retained over time.

Operating expenses and margin

The 20.8 percent increase in consolidated operating income reflects higher margin contribution on year over year volume increases and cost and productivity improvements partially offset by structural cost increases. The 2003 operating ratio (operating expenses divided by operating revenue) was 96.0 compared to 96.5 in 2002. Both Saia and Jevic continued initiatives to improve productivity and control variable costs as monthly volumes fluctuated. These costs and productivity initiatives were partially offset by structural cost increases in wage rates, healthcare costs, casualty insurance premiums and other operating expenses. Higher fuel prices (exclusive of taxes), in conjunction with volume changes, caused $10.6 million of the increase in operating expenses and supplies. These fuel price increases were more than offset by increased revenues from the fuel surcharge program.

Saia had operating income of $27.7 million in 2003, compared to $21.9 million in 2002. The operating ratio at Saia was 94.7 in 2003 compared to 95.5 in 2002. Despite the relatively flat yield discussed above, Saia improved its operating income through continued strong cost controls and productivity initiatives that improved performance metrics in pickup and delivery, linehaul and dock areas of the Company. These improvements in labor productivity, safety initiatives and other expense reductions offset higher healthcare costs, a general wage increase in August 2003 and other wage adjustments during the year. As of the end of 2003, Saia’s wage rates were 4.5 percent higher than the end of 2002. Saia’s overall increase in wage expense was partially offset by a decrease in purchased transportation, as Saia more efficiently utilized purchased transportation in meeting its peak capacity needs.

Jevic operating income was $9.4 million in 2003, up from $5.8 million in 2002. Jevic’s revenue and yield improvement offset structural cost increases in 2003. The operating ratio at Jevic was 96.9 in 2003 compared to 98.0 in 2002. Jevic reduced its frequency rate for workers’ compensation claims in 2003. Workers’ compensation expense in 2002 included $2.7 million higher than anticipated costs relating to unfavorable development in the severity of open claims and the implementation of a more conservative, actuarial estimate for establishing workers’ compensation reserves. This level of profitability was obtained despite a 1.0 percent average wage increase over 2002. Jevic increased its use of purchased transportation to fill peak capacity needs during 2003 versus the prior year, principally due to operational challenges related to a continuing shortage of drivers throughout the year.

Holding company operating expenses for 2003 were $4.3 million in excess of costs allocated to the operating companies. These holding company costs included a $0.4 million charge related to the appreciation of SCST stock accounted for in the Capital Accumulation Plan, a $0.9 million charge for the estimated payout of our long-term incentive plan related to the appreciation of SCST stock, $1.1 million related to reserve increases on older casualty claims and $0.2 million for a consulting project. These older casualty claims were incurred prior to our September 2002 spin-off, and had been subject to a deductible buy-down program with our former parent. The increase in reserves was appropriate to estimate the increased severity potential of these claims. The holding company had $0.5

15

million in operating expenses in excess of costs allocated to the operating companies in 2002, which was not indicative of post spin-off operations.

Other

Substantially all SCST nonoperating expenses represent interest expense. The increase in interest cost is a result of the Company’s post spin-off capital structure consisting of predominantly longer-term, higher fixed rate instruments versus the principally shorter term floating rate structure with the former parent company. The consolidated effective tax rate was 37.6 percent in 2003 compared to 42.5 percent in 2002. The decrease in the effective tax rate is due to the tax benefit for previously unrecognized state operating loss carryforwards of $1.0 million, due to changes in state tax laws enacted in 2003, together with the reduced impact of nondeductible business expenses on higher income before income taxes. The 2002 results include a charge of $75.2 million recorded in the first quarter of 2002 from the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill. The notes to the consolidated financial statements provide an analysis of the income tax provision and the effective tax rate and additional discussion on the charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill.

Working capital/capital expenditures

The change in working capital is predominantly the result of a higher invested cash balance and increases in accounts receivable, due to higher revenues in December 2003 versus December 2002, offset by increases in wage and employee benefits accruals, primarily related to increased accruals for profit sharing and vacation. Restrictions on prepayment of long-term fixed rate debt resulted in a higher cash and cash equivalent balance from operations in 2003 . The 2003 capital investments primarily represent replacement of revenue equipment and investment in technology equipment and software.

Year ended December 31, 2002 vs. year ended December 31, 2001

Revenue and volume

Revenue of $775.4 million in 2002 reflected relatively flat year over year growth resulting from small volume increases and competitive pricing pressures brought on by the sluggish economy. In addition, fuel surcharge revenue was lower by approximately $5.4 million in 2002.

Saia had operating revenue of $489.8 million in 2002, an increase of 0.9 percent over 2001 operating revenue of $485.4 million. Saia’s operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge was $480.3 million in 2002, up 1.6 percent from $472.6 million in 2001. Saia LTL revenue per hundredweight excluding fuel surcharge (a measure of yield) decreased 2.1 percent to $9.52 per hundredweight for 2002, while LTL tonnage was up 4.0 percent to 2.3 million tons and LTL shipments were up 4.2 percent to 4.4 million shipments. The decrease in yield is a combination of freight mix and competitive pricing pressure. Saia had approximately 60 percent of revenue that was subject to individual customer price adjustment negotiations that occur intermittently throughout the year. The remaining 40 percent of revenue was subject to the annual general rate increase. On July 15, 2002, Saia implemented a 5.9 percent general rate increase for this group of customers. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes impact the extent to which customer rate increases are retained over time.

Jevic had operating revenue of $286 million in 2002, consistent with $286 million in 2001. Jevic’s operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge was $280.2 million in 2002, up 0.5 percent from $278.6 million in 2001. Jevic yield excluding fuel surcharge increased 1.1 percent to $6.15 per hundredweight, while tonnage was down 0.8 percent to 2.2 million tons and shipments were up 1.7 percent to 971,000 shipments. Jevic experienced improved quarter over quarter volume comparisons in the second half of 2002 after several quarters of declining trends due to the economic downturn and competition. The increase in yield was due to some firming in the pricing environment. Jevic had approximately 60 percent of revenue that was subject to individual customer price adjustment negotiations that occur intermittently throughout the year. The remaining 40 percent of revenue was subject to the annual general rate increase. On August 1, 2002, Jevic implemented a 5.9 percent general rate increase for this smaller group of customers. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes impact the extent to which customer rate increases are retained over time.

Operating expenses and margin

The increase in 2002 operating income is a combination of cost management efforts, a modest increase in shipping volumes and the elimination of prior year integration charges and goodwill amortization. The operating income in 2001 included $6.7 million of costs for the integration of WestEx and Action Express into Saia and goodwill

16

amortization of approximately $3.0 million that was eliminated in 2002. Both Saia and Jevic continued initiatives to improve productivity and control variable costs as volumes fluctuated. However, these cost reduction and productivity initiatives were partially offset by increases in wage rates (total employees increased by only 1.0 percent to 7,500 at year end), casualty insurance premiums and other operating expenses. The Company had a $3.5 million decrease in operating expense and supplies as a result of declines in fuel prices and volume changes which reduced total year over year fuel costs.

Saia had operating income of $21.9 million in 2002, compared to $9.7 million in 2001 (including integration charges of $6.7 million). The operating ratio at Saia was 95.5 in 2002 compared to 98.0 in 2001. Despite the decrease in yield discussed above, Saia improved its operating income due to strong cost controls and improved operating efficiencies. Improvements in productivity offset higher workers’ compensation costs and pay increases. Saia implemented a wage increase in August 2002, which was substantially offset by labor productivity gains and other expense reductions. As of the end of 2002, Saia’s wage rates were 4 percent higher than the end of 2001 reflecting some changes in wage structure as well. Saia increased its use of purchased transportation to fill peak capacity needs during 2002 versus the prior year.

Jevic operating income was $5.8 million in 2002, down from $6.0 million in 2001. The operating ratio at Jevic was 98.0 in 2002 compared to 97.9 in 2001. Jevic’s profitability benefited from the elimination of goodwill amortization of approximately $2.0 million that was included in 2001. However, Jevic results for 2002 also include $2.7 million higher than anticipated workers’ compensation expense relating to unfavorable development in the severity of open claims and the implementation of a more conservative, actuarial estimate for establishing workers’ compensation reserves. This level of profitability was obtained despite a 2.6 percent average wage increase over 2001. The wage increase was offset by a reduction in purchased transportation as Jevic more efficiently utilized purchased transportation in meeting its peak capacity needs.

Other

Borrowings for the first nine months of 2002 and full year 2001 reflect lower rate, shorter-term financing with Yellow, the former parent. However, the 2001 interest expense reflects higher average debt balances. The consolidated effective tax rate was 42.5 percent in 2002 compared to 84.0 percent in 2001. The decrease in effective tax rate is due to the lessened impact of nondeductible business expenses on higher income before income taxes along with the elimination of nondeductible goodwill amortization in 2002. The 2002 results include a charge of $75.2 million in the first quarter of 2002 from the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill. The notes to the consolidated financial statements provide an analysis of the income tax provision and the effective tax rate and additional discussion on the charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill.

Working capital/capital expenditures

The change in working capital is a result of increases in accounts receivable due to higher revenues in December 2002 versus December 2001. Working capital was further increased by a reduction of current maturities of long-term debt and a substantial increase in cash and cash equivalents in 2002. Cash from operations in 2002 was used to pay down short-term variable rate debt; however, restrictions on prepayment of long-term fixed rate debt resulted in a higher cash and cash equivalent balance. The 2002 capital investments primarily represent replacement of revenue equipment and the purchase of three service facilities for Saia, net of proceeds from the sale of an existing Saia service facility.

Outlook

Our business is highly correlated to the general economy, and in particular industrial production. However, in 2003, we achieved revenue growth and profitability improvement despite a relatively flat industrial economic environment. For 2004, we anticipate an improving economy that will allow continued growth in our existing geography and subsidiary-specific profit improvement initiatives, focused on cost management, productivity and asset utilization that will help offset anticipated structural cost increases in wages and healthcare claims. We also believe an improving economy will provide the opportunity for improved pricing and yield management.

Our priorities in 2004 include a continued focus on providing top quality service, improving safety performance and investing in management and infrastructure for future growth. Actual results for 2004 will depend upon a number of factors, including the timing, speed and magnitude of the economic recovery, our ability to match capacity with shifting volume levels, competitive pricing pressures, insurance claims and integration risks.

17

See “Forward-Looking Statements” for a more complete discussion of potential risks and uncertainties that could materially affect our future performance.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value method of recording stock option expense under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123”. See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. See Notes 1 and 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Financial Condition

SCST liquidity needs arise primarily from capital investment in new equipment, land and structures and information technology, as well as funding working capital requirements.

In connection with the Spin-off, SCST issued $100 million in Senior Notes under a $125 million Master Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and certain of its affiliates. SCST also entered into a $50 million Agented Revolving Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., as agent, which has subsequently been increased to $75 million. Proceeds from the Senior Notes and a portion of the Credit Agreement were used for payments due Yellow discussed below. SCST had approximately $120.5 million outstanding under line-of-credit agreements with Yellow immediately prior to the Spin-off, of which $113.6 million was repaid to Yellow under the terms of the Spin-off. The remaining $6.9 million reduction in the line-of-credit with Yellow was a capital contribution to SCST from Yellow.

The Company’s long-term debt at December 31, 2003 includes $100 million in Senior Notes that are unsecured with a fixed interest rate of 7.38 percent and an average maturity of eight years. Payments due under the Senior Notes are interest only until June 30, 2006 and at that time semi-annual principal payments begin, with the final payment due December 2013. Under the terms of the Senior Notes, SCST must maintain several financial covenants including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (EBITDAR), a minimum interest coverage ratio and a minimum tangible net worth, among others. At December 31, 2003, SCST was in compliance with these covenants. In addition, SCST has third party borrowings of approximately $16.5 million in subordinated notes.

On November 14, 2003, the Credit Agreement was amended to $75 million to increase the Company’s capacity for letters of credit in support of self-insured retentions for casualty and workers’ compensation claims without diminishing its borrowing capacity. The amended $75 million Credit Agreement is unsecured with an interest rate based on LIBOR or prime at the Company’s option, plus an applicable spread, in certain instances, and matures in September 2006. The availability under the Credit Agreement is limited to SCST’s qualified receivables (as defined in the Credit Agreement). At December 31, 2003, SCST had no borrowings under the Credit Agreement, $35.3 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement and availability of $35.2 million based on SCST’s qualified receivables. The available portion of the Credit Agreement may be used for future capital expenditures, working capital and letter of credit requirements as needed. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, SCST must maintain several financial covenants including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDAR, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a minimum tangible net worth, among others. At December 31, 2003, SCST was in compliance with these covenants.

At December 31, 2003 Yellow provided on behalf of SCST approximately $2.3 million in outstanding surety bonds. These bonds, issued by insurance companies, serve as collateral support primarily for workers’ compensation programs in states where SCST is self-insured. The price and availability of surety bonds fluctuates over time with general conditions in the insurance market. A lack of availability of surety bonds could result in the need for Yellow to issue additional letters of credit. At December 31, 2003, Yellow has provided on behalf of SCST $3.3 million in outstanding letters of credit under historical insurance programs, which Saia participated with other Yellow affiliates. The collateral support by Yellow is expected to remain in place until claims for these prior years are closed. Under the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into in connection with the Spin-off,

18

SCST pays Yellow’s actual cost of the collateral through October 2005 after which time it is cost plus 100 basis points through October 2007.

Projected net capital expenditures for 2004 are approximately $55 million, an approximately $5 million increase from 2003 net capital expenditures. Approximately $3 million of the 2004 capital budget was committed at December 31, 2003. Net capital expenditures pertain primarily to replacement of revenue equipment at both subsidiaries and additional investments in information technology, land and structures.

The Company has historically generated cash flows from operations that have funded its capital expenditure requirements. Cash flows from operations were $58.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, which were $8.4 million more than 2003 net capital expenditures. The timing of capital expenditures can largely be managed around the seasonal working capital requirements of the Company. However, the Company has adequate sources of capital to meet short-term liquidity needs through its cash ($30.9 million at December 31, 2003) and availability under its revolving credit facility ($35.2 million at December 31, 2003). In addition to these sources of liquidity, the Company has $25 million under its long-term debt facilities, which is available to fund other longer-term strategic investments. The February 16, 2004 acquisition of Clark Bros. Transfer, Inc. utilized approximately $25 million in cash. Future operating cash flows are primarily dependent upon the Company’s profitability and its ability to manage its working capital requirements, primarily accounts receivable, accounts payable and wage and benefit accruals. The Company has the ability to adjust its capital expenditures in the event of a shortfall in anticipated operating cash flows. The Company believes its current capital structure and availability under its borrowing facilities along with anticipated cash flows from future operations will be sufficient to fund planned replacements of revenue equipment and investments in technology. Additional sources of capital may be needed to fund future long-term strategic growth initiatives.

Actual net capital expenditures are summarized in the following table (in millions):

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, our operating leases are not recorded in our balance sheet; however, the minimum lease payments related to these leases are disclosed in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, and in “Contractual Cash Obligations” table below. In addition to the principal amounts disclosed in the tables below, the Company has interest obligations of approximately $8.6 million for 2004 and decreasing for each year thereafter, based on borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2003.

Contractual Cash Obligations

The following tables set forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2003 (in millions):

(1)

See Note 3 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

19

(2)

Includes commitments of $2.6 million for capital expenditures.

Critical Accounting Policies And Estimates

SCST makes estimates and assumptions in preparing the consolidated financial statements that affect reported amounts and disclosures therein. In the opinion of management, the accounting policies that generally have the most significant impact on the financial position and results of operations of SCST include:

	•		Claims and Insurance Accruals. SCST has self-insured retention limits generally ranging from $250,000 to $2,000,000 per claim for medical, workers’ compensation, auto liability, casualty and cargo claims. For the current policy year, the Company has an aggregate exposure limited to an additional $2,000,000 above its $1,000,000 per claim deductible under its auto liability program. The liabilities associated with the risk retained by SCST are estimated in part based on historical experience, third-party actuarial analysis, demographics, nature and severity, past experience and other assumptions. The liabilities for self-funded retention are included in claims and insurance reserves based on claims incurred, with liabilities for unsettled claims and claims incurred but not yet reported being actuarially determined with respect to workers’ compensation claims and with respect to all other liabilities, estimated based on management’s evaluation of the nature and severity of individual claims and historical experience. However, these estimated accruals could be significantly affected if the actual costs of SCST differ from these assumptions. These estimates tend to be historically accurate over time; however, assumptions regarding severity of claims, medical cost inflation, as well as specific case facts can create short-term volatility in estimates.
	•		Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances. Revenue is recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis for shipments in transit while expenses are recognized as incurred. In addition, estimates included in the recognition of revenue and accounts receivable include estimates of shipments in transit and estimates of future adjustments to revenue and accounts receivable for billing adjustments and collectibility.
			Revenue is recognized in a systematic process whereby estimates of shipments in transit are based upon actual shipments picked up, scheduled day of delivery and current trend in average rates charged to customers. Since the cycle for pick up and delivery of shipments is generally 1-3 days, typically less than 5 percent of a total month’s revenue is in transit at the end of any month. Estimates for credit losses and billing adjustments are based upon historical experience of credit losses, adjustments processed and trends of collections. Billing adjustments are primarily made for discounts and billing corrections. These estimates are continuously evaluated and updated; however, changes in economic conditions, pricing arrangements and other factors can significantly impact these estimates.
	•		Depreciation and Capitalization of Assets. Under the SCST accounting policy for property and equipment, management establishes appropriate depreciable lives and salvage values for SCST’s revenue equipment (tractors and trailers) based on their estimated useful lives and estimated fair values to be received when the equipment is sold or traded in. These estimates are continuously evaluated and updated when circumstances warrant. However, actual depreciation and salvage values could differ from these assumptions based on market conditions and other factors.
	•		Recovery of Goodwill. Annually, SCST assesses goodwill impairment by applying a fair value based test. This fair value based test involves assumptions regarding the long-term future performance of the operating subsidiaries of SCST, fair value of the assets and liabilities of SCST, cost of capital rates and other assumptions. However, actual recovery of remaining goodwill could differ from these assumptions based on

20

market conditions and other factors. In the event remaining goodwill is determined to be impaired a charge to earnings would be required.

These accounting policies, and others, are described in further detail in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant judgments and estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the financial statements. In many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. We maintain a thorough process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the many estimates that are required to prepare the financial statements. However, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Report, including those contained in Item 1, “Outlook” and Item 7, “Financial Condition” are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of SCST. Words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “believe” and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We use such forward-looking statements regarding our future financial condition and results of operations and our business operations in this Report. All forward-looking statements reflect the present expectation of future events of our management and are subject to a number of important factors, risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These factors and risks include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions; labor relations; cost and availability of qualified drivers; governmental regulations, including but not limited to Hours of Service, engine emissions and Homeland Security; cost and availability of fuel; inclement weather; integration risks; competitive initiatives and pricing pressures; self-insurance claims and other expense volatility; and other financial, operational and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings.

As a result of these and other factors, no assurance can be given as to our future results and achievements. Accordingly, a forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. We are under no obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

SCST is exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of interest rates and fuel prices. The detail of SCST’s debt structure is more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. To mitigate our risk to rising fuel prices, Saia and Jevic each have implemented fuel surcharge programs. These programs are well established within the industry and customer acceptance of fuel surcharges remains high. Since the amount of fuel surcharge is based on average national diesel fuel prices and is reset weekly, exposure of SCST to fuel price volatility is significantly reduced.

The following table provides information about SCST third-party financial instruments as of December 31, 2003 with comparative information for December 31, 2002. The table presents principal cash flows (in millions) and related weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. The fair value of the fixed rate debt was estimated based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

21

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

22

Independent Auditors’ Report

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
SCS Transportation, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SCS Transportation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the two years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. The 2001 consolidated financial statements of SCS Transportation, Inc. were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors’ report dated January 25, 2002, on those consolidated financial statements was unqualified and included an explanatory paragraph that described the relationship of SCS Transportation, Inc. and Yellow Corporation, before the revisions described in Notes 5 and 13.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SCS Transportation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed above, the 2001 consolidated financial statements of SCS Transportation, Inc. were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As described in Note 5, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , and these consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the required transitional disclosures. Additionally, as described in Note 13, these consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the required 2001 financial statement schedule information for valuation and qualifying accounts. In our opinion, the disclosures for 2001 in Notes 5 and 13 are appropriate and have been properly applied. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements of SCS Transportation, Inc. other than with respect to such disclosures and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
January 21, 2004,
except for Note 14, which is as of February 16, 2004

23

This is a copy of the audit report previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with SCS Transportation, Inc.’s 2001 consolidated financial statements previously filed on Form 10 and before certain limited revisions described in Notes 5 and 13. This report refers to periods not presented herein. This audit report has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with this filing on Form 10-K.

Report of independent public accountants

To the Board of Directors of
Yellow Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries (formerly Yellow Corporation’s Regional Transportation Group as identified in Note 1) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, the Parent company equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

SCS Transportation, Inc., is wholly owned by Yellow Corporation. As indicated in Note 1, SCS Transportation, Inc., relies on Yellow Corporation for administrative, cash management and other services. The financial position, results of operations and cash flows of SCS Transportation, Inc., could differ from those that would have resulted had SCS Transportation, Inc., operated autonomously or as an entity independent of Yellow Corporation.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Kansas City, Missouri,
January 25, 2002

24

SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(in thousands, except share data)