UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 30, 2006

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 0-15386

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cerner Vision

Cerner’s vision has evolved from a fundamental thought: Healthcare should revolve around the individual, not the encounter. This concept led to Cerner’s vision of a Community Health Model and the creation of the unified Cerner Millennium architecture, the Company’s person-centric, enterprise-wide architecture. The Community Health Model encompasses four steps:

Automate the Care Process

Cerner offers a longitudinal, person-centric electronic medical record, giving clinicians electronic access to the right information at the right time and place to achieve the optimal health outcome.

Connect the Person

Cerner is dedicated to building a personal health system. Medical information and care regimens accessible from home empower consumers to effectively manage their conditions and adhere to treatment plans, creating a new medium between physicians and individuals.

Structure the Knowledge

Cerner is dedicated to building systems that help bring the best science to every medical decision by structuring, storing and studying the content surrounding each care episode to achieve optimal clinical and financial outcomes.

Close the Loop

Incorporating a medical discovery into daily practice can take as long as ten years. Cerner is dedicated to building systems that implement evidence-based medicine, reducing the average time from the discovery of an improved method to the change in the standard of care.

Cerner Strategy

Key elements of the Company’s business strategy include:

Leverage the unified Cerner Millennium architecture and the depth and breadth of Cerner solutions to continue expanding market share.

	•		Increase penetration of both large health systems and independent hospitals
	•		Further penetrate existing client base by cross-selling additional Cerner solutions and services
	•		Increase penetration of physician practices by offering a high-value suite of solutions with low up-front and recurring costs
	•		Continue to expand presence in non-U.S. markets

Continue to develop innovative solutions and services that leverage the Company’s technology and human capital expertise and that drive continued organic revenue growth.

	•		Innovative solutions for employers
	•		State and regional community health record initiatives
	•		Healthcare device innovation
	•		Clinical process optimization
	•		Solutions and services that leverage the data being captured in the digital healthcare environment
	•		More efficient methods of transacting healthcare

Offer more efficient and predictable implementations and systems that can be operated at lower costs to reduce total cost of ownership for the Company’s clients.

• The Bedrock ^TM technology automates the implementation and management of the Cerner Millennium information platform.

• CernerWorks ^SM managed services allow Cerner to manage complexity and technology risks for clients while providing more reliability and lower costs.

• The MethodM ^SM approach is the Company’s single methodology to working with clients to deliver value through implementation of Cerner Millennium solutions.

Deliver optimal client experience that will allow critical relationships with the Company’s clients to continue growing.

	•		World-class support services
	•		Predictable and efficient implementations and upgrades
	•		Lower total cost of ownership

•

Commitment to research and development

Solution and Service Highlights

Foremost among the Company’s major accomplishments in 2006 was the release of Cerner Millennium 2007 . With the Millennium 2007 solutions, the Company delivered the largest set of new functions it has ever included in a single release. The Millennium 2007 solutions included a major change in design philosophy around role-venue-condition workflow that resulted in a new physician-user interface and workflow. We also redefined our approach to quality by implementing new testing and performance standards.

We are also improving the value of our solutions through CernerWorks , our six-year-old, remote-hosting business. Our system availability is now approaching 99.99 percent, or “four nines”, scheduled availability.

In 2006, we also introduced the Lights On ^™ Network, surveillance system and service. The network monitors client-hosted and Cerner-hosted systems in near real-time, predicting and helping to prevent future system issues.

Cerner made significant changes in our physician practice business, PowerWorks ^® , in 2006. We went to market with a single price point for automating a physician practice's front office, clinical workflow and back office. We also redesigned our implementation approach, using a tele-service model and Web-based training, which significantly reduces, and in some cases eliminates, the need for on-site implementation consultants.

The Company is also enhancing its professional implementation and consulting services. Through our MethodM methodology, we give our clients a predictable approach to implementation that translates into a faster return on their investment. And we expanded the productivity gains we have made with our centralized implementation and upgrade centers and our Bedrock solution (our system of automated tools that guide clients through the design, build and maintenance of a Cerner Millennium system). With these initiatives and continued efficiencies in CernerWorks managed services, Cerner is striving to reduce the effort of implementing and operating the Company’s systems.

An area of focus for 2007 is Millennium Lighthouse ^™ , a consulting practice that works with clients to determine previously unidentified and unconnected relationships among healthcare processes and outcomes. Clients use the solutions to compare these relationships to similar organizations and implement measurable process changes.

Positioning for Continued Long-Term Growth
Cerner believes the market remains healthy for selling and delivering HIT solutions for acute care and physician organizations in the U.S. In addition, we are continuing to expand our boundaries. Four specific areas of focus include:

	1.		Continued expansion of our global reach
	2.		Healthcare data, using our extensive clinical databases to help pharmaceutical companies solve several issues such as getting drugs approved faster and safety monitoring
	3.		Creating connected healthcare devices
	4.		Reducing friction in healthcare through more efficient payment for services, community connectivity, a national record bank and a global record bank

Global Expansion

The Company continues to grow in global markets. Cerner provides software for England’s national Choose and Book scheduling system, which exceeded two million referrals during 2006. We also won a new contract to provide an imaging diagnostic solution in the southwest and northwest of England. Cerner also has contracts to provide HIT for approximately 40 percent of the country’s population, namely the Southern England and London clusters of the country’s Connecting for Health initiative.

Cerner is expanding its presence in Australia, with contracts to provide HIT in the two largest states, Victoria and New South Wales. We are also increasing our focus in other world markets, including France, the Middle East, Malaysia and Canada.

Healthcare Data

Cerner’s Life Sciences business, which provides analysis services to pharmaceutical companies, continues to grow. In 2006, Cerner acquired Galt Associates, Inc. (now Cerner Galt, Inc.), a company that helps drug companies better understand the performance of their compounds through surveillance of adverse drug events. An important component of Cerner Life Sciences is the Health Facts ^® solution, a data warehouse that captures and stores the data generated by Cerner solutions, aggregates it and develops reports that enable healthcare organizations to identify areas for intervention and improvement, and benchmark progress against regional and national data.

Connected Healthcare Devices

In 2006, Cerner extended Cerner Millennium with our CareAware healthcare device architecture and MDBus ^™ technology, a “USB for healthcare.” This innovation extends the reach of Cerner Millennium solutions, opening new opportunities for growth. The CareAware architecture allows for connection of healthcare devices to Cerner Millennium and non- Millennium systems. The Company also continued development of our new RxStation ^™ automated medication dispensing devices.

Reducing Friction

Healthe ^™ , our family of solutions and services for employers and governments, is another area of focus for the Company.

As an employer, Cerner has begun using the Health e Exchange, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as the third party administrator of our health plans. Cerner intends to begin offering the Health e Exchange third party administrator services to other employers. Also included in Healthe services is our on-site Health e Clinic.

Software Development

We commit significant resources to developing new health information system solutions. As of December 30, 2006, approximately 2,300 associates were engaged full-time in software solution development activities. Total expenditures for the development and enhancement of our software solutions were approximately $262,163,000, $225,606,000 and $188,264,000 during the 2006, 2005 and 2004 fiscal years, respectively. These figures include both capitalized and non-capitalized portions and exclude amounts amortized for financial reporting purposes.

The Company expects to continue investment and development efforts for its current and future solution offerings. As new clinical and management information needs emerge, Cerner intends to enhance its current software solution lines with new versions released to clients on a periodic basis. In addition, Cerner plans to: expand its current software solution lines by developing additional information systems for clinical, financial, operational and/or consumer use; continue to support simultaneous use of Cerner solutions across multiple facilities; and, continue to expand in the global marketplace.

The Company is committed to maintaining open attributes in its system architecture to achieve operability in a diverse set of technical and application environments. The Company strives to design its systems to co-exist with disparate applications developed and supported by other suppliers. This effort is exemplified by Cerner’s Open Engine Application Gateway™ , Open Port Interface™ and MillenniumObjects ^® offerings.

Sales and Marketing

The markets for Cerner’s HIT solutions, healthcare devices and services include integrated delivery networks, physician groups and networks, managed care organizations, hospitals, medical centers, free-standing reference laboratories, home health agencies, blood banks, imaging centers, pharmacies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, employer coalitions and public health organizations. To date, a substantial portion of system sales have been in clinical solutions in hospital-based provider organizations. The Cerner Millennium architecture is highly scalable, with solutions being used in organizations ranging from several-doctor physician practices, to community hospitals, to complex integrated delivery networks, to local, regional and national government agencies. All Cerner Millennium solutions are designed to operate on HP or IBM platforms, thereby allowing Cerner to be price competitive across the full size and organizational structure range of healthcare providers. The sale of a Cerner software health information system usually takes approximately nine to 18 months, from the time of initial contact to the signing of a contract.

The Company’s executive marketing management is located in its North Kansas City, Missouri, headquarters, while its client representatives are deployed across the United States and globally. In addition to the U.S., the Company, through subsidiaries and joint ventures, has sales associates and/or offices in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Malaysia, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates. Cerner’s consolidated revenues include foreign sales of $207,367,000, $113,317,000 and $62,426,000 for the 2006, 2005 and 2004 fiscal years, respectively.

The Company supports its sales force with technical personnel who perform demonstrations of Cerner solutions and services and assist clients in determining the proper hardware and software configurations. The Company’s primary direct marketing strategy is to generate sales contacts from its existing client base and through presentations at industry seminars and tradeshows. Cerner utilizes telemarketing primarily for sales to physician practices. Cerner markets the PowerWorks solution, offered on a subscription basis, directly to the physician practice market. Cerner attends a number of major tradeshows each year and sponsors executive user conferences, which feature industry experts who address the HIT needs of large healthcare organizations.

Client Services

Substantially all of Cerner’s clients enter into software maintenance agreements with the Company for support of their Cerner systems. In addition to immediate software support in the event of problems, these agreements allow clients the use of new releases of the Cerner solutions covered by maintenance agreements. Each client has 24-hour access to the client support team located at Cerner’s world headquarters in North Kansas City, Missouri and the Company’s global support organization in the United Kingdom. Most of Cerner’s clients also enter into hardware maintenance agreements with Cerner. These arrangements normally provide for a fixed monthly fee for specified services. In the majority of cases, Cerner subcontracts hardware maintenance to the hardware manufacturer. Cerner also offers a set of managed services that include remote hosting, application management services and disaster recovery.

Backlog

At December 30, 2006, Cerner had a contract backlog of approximately $2,194,460,000 as compared to approximately $1,724,583,000 at December 31, 2005. Such backlog represents system sales and services from signed contracts, which have not yet been recognized as revenue. At December 30, 2006, the Company had approximately $132,748,000 of contracts receivable, which represents revenues recognized under the percentage of completion method but not yet billable under the terms of the contract. At December 30, 2006, Cerner had a software support and maintenance backlog of approximately $469,473,000 as compared to approximately $415,681,000 at December 31, 2005. Such backlog represents contracted software support and hardware maintenance services for a period of 12 months. The Company estimates that approximately 42 percent of the aggregate backlog at December 30, 2006 of $2,663,933,000 will be recognized as revenue during 2007.

Competition

The market for HIT solutions, devices and services is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to rapid technological change. Our principal existing competitors in the healthcare solutions and services market include: Eclipsys Corporation, Epic Systems Corporation, GE Healthcare Technologies, iSoft Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Medical Information Technology, Inc. (“Meditech”), Misys Healthcare Systems and Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation, each of which offers a suite of software solutions that compete with many of our software solutions and services. Other competitors focus on only a portion of the market that Cerner addresses. For example, competitors such as Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Emdeon Corporation and Quality Systems, Inc. offer solutions to the physician practice market but do not currently have a significant presence in the health systems and independent hospital market. We view our principal competitors in the healthcare device market to include: Omnicell, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and McKesson Corporation; and we view our principal competitors in the healthcare transactions market to include: ProxyMed, Inc., Emdeon Corporation, McKesson Corporation and The TriZetto Group, Inc., with almost all of these competitors being substantially larger or having more experience and market share than us in their respective market. In addition, we expect that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers, system integrators, managed care companies and others specializing in the healthcare industry may offer competitive software solutions, devices or services. The pace of change in the HIT market is rapid and there are frequent new software solution, device or service introductions, enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. We believe that the principal competitive factors in this market

include the breadth and quality of solution and service offerings, the stability of the solution provider, the features and capabilities of the information systems and devices, the ongoing support for the systems and devices and the potential for enhancements and future compatible software solutions and devices.

Number of Employees (“Associates”)

As of December 30, 2006, the Company employed 7,419 associates worldwide.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Cerner Corporation

We may be subject to product-related liabilities. Many of our software solutions, healthcare devices or services (including life sciences/research services) provide data for use by healthcare providers in providing care to patients. No claims have been brought against us to date regarding injuries related to the use of our software solutions, healthcare devices or services (including life sciences/research services), but such claims may be made in the future. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage in an amount that we believe is sufficient for our business, there can be no assurance that such coverage will cover a particular claim that may be brought in the future, prove to be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful material claim brought against us, if uninsured or under-insured, could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may be subject to claims for system errors and warranties. Our software solutions and healthcare devices, particularly the Cerner Millennium versions, are very complex. As with complex software solutions and devices offered by others, our software solutions and healthcare devices may contain coding or other errors, especially when first introduced. Although we conduct extensive testing, we have discovered errors in our software solutions and healthcare devices after their introduction. Our software solutions and healthcare devices are intended for use in collecting and displaying clinical information used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Therefore, users of our software solutions and healthcare devices have a greater sensitivity to errors than the market for software products and devices generally. Our client agreements typically provide warranties concerning material errors and other matters. Failure of a client’s Cerner software solutions and/or healthcare devices to meet these warranties could constitute a material breach under the client agreement, allowing the client to terminate the agreement and possibly obtain a refund and/or damages, or might require us to incur additional expense in order to make the software solution or healthcare device meet these criteria. Our client agreements generally limit our liability arising from such claims but such limits may not be enforceable in certain jurisdictions or circumstances. A successful material claim brought against us, if uninsured or under-insured, could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may experience interruption at our data centers or client support facilities. We perform data center and/or hosting services for certain clients, including the storage of critical patient and administrative data. In addition, we provide support services to our clients through various client support facilities. We have redundancies, such as multiple backup generators and redundant telecommunications lines, as well as technical and physical security safeguards, built into our operations to reduce the likelihood of disruptions. However, complete failure of all generators, impairment of all telecommunications lines, severe damage (environmental, accidental, intentional or pandemic) to the buildings, the equipment inside the buildings housing our data centers, the client data contained therein and/or the personnel trained to operate such facilities could cause a disruption in operations and negatively impact clients who depend on us for data center and system support services. Any interruption in operations at our data centers and/or client support facilities could damage our reputation, cause us to lose existing clients, hurt our ability to obtain new clients, result in revenue loss, cause potential liability to our clients and us and increase insurance and other operating costs.

Our proprietary technology may be subjected to infringement claims or may be infringed upon. We rely upon a combination of license agreements, confidentiality procedures, employee nondisclosure agreements, confidentiality agreements with third parties and technical measures to maintain the confidentiality and trade secrecy of our proprietary information. We also rely on trademark and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property rights. We have initiated a patent program but currently have a

limited patent portfolio. Despite our protective measures, we may not be able to adequately protect against copying, reverse-engineering, infringement or unauthorized use or disclosure of our intellectual property.

In addition, we could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of competitors and patents in the healthcare information technology market increases, the functionality of our software solutions and services expands, and we enter new markets such as healthcare device innovation, healthcare transactions and life sciences. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial damage award, develop noninfringing technology, obtain a license and/or cease selling the solutions, devices and services that contain or rely upon the infringing intellectual property.

We are subject to risks associated with our global operations. We market, sell and service our solutions, devices and services globally. We have established offices around the world, including in: the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia Pacific region. We will continue to expand our global operations and enter new global markets. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources to develop successful direct and indirect global sales and support channels. Our business is generally transacted in the local functional currency. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local partners. There is a risk that we may sometimes choose the wrong partner. For these reasons, we may not be able to maintain or increase global market demand for our solutions, devices and services.

Global operations are subject to inherent risks, and our future results could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors. These include, but are not limited to:

	•		Greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods
	•		Difficulties and costs of staffing and managing global operations
	•		The impact of global economic conditions
	•		Certification, licensing or regulatory requirements
	•		Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements
	•		Changes to or reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some countries
	•		Inability to obtain necessary financing on reasonable terms to adequately support global operations and expansion
	•		Unfavorable or changing foreign currency exchange rates
	•		Potentially adverse tax consequences
	•		Different or additional functionality requirements
	•		Trade protection measures
	•		Service provider and government spending patterns
	•		Natural disasters, war or terrorist acts
	•		Poor selection of a partner in a country
	•		Political conditions which may impact sales or threaten the safety of associates or our continued presence in these countries

Our failure to effectively hedge exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could unfavorably affect our performance. We have recently begun to utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Some of these instruments and contracts may involve elements of market and credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information about risk on financial instruments, see “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Market Risk.” Further, our financial results from global operations may decrease if we fail to execute or improperly hedge our exposure to currency fluctuations.

Our success depends upon the recruitment and retention of key personnel. To remain competitive in our industries, we must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled managerial, sales, marketing, consulting and technical personnel, including executives, consultants, programmers and systems architects skilled in the healthcare information technology, healthcare devices, healthcare transactions and life sciences industries and the technical environments in which our solutions, devices and services operate. Competition for such personnel in our industries is intense. Our failure to attract additional qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our prospects for long-term growth. Our

success is dependent to a significant degree on the continued contributions of key management, sales, marketing, consulting and technical personnel. We have succession plans in place; however, the unexpected loss of key personnel could have a material adverse impact to our business and results of operations, and could potentially inhibit development and delivery of our solutions, devices and services and market share advances.

We significantly rely on third party suppliers. We license or purchase intellectual property and technology (such as software, hardware and content) from third parties, including some competitors, and incorporate it into or sell it in conjunction with our solutions, devices and services, some of which are critical to the operation and delivery of our solutions, devices and services. If any of the third party suppliers were to change product offerings, increase prices or terminate our licenses or supply contracts, we might need to seek alternative suppliers and incur additional internal or external development costs to ensure continued performance of our solutions, devices and services. Such alternatives may not be available on attractive terms, or may not be as widely accepted or as effective as the intellectual property or technology provided by our existing suppliers. If the cost of licensing, purchasing or maintaining the third party intellectual property or technology significantly increases, our gross margin levels could significantly decrease. In addition, interruption in functionality of our solutions, devices and services could adversely affect future sales of solutions, devices and services.

We intend to continue strategic business acquisitions which are subject to inherent risks. In order to expand our solutions, device offerings and services and grow our market and client base, we may continue to seek and complete strategic business acquisitions that we believe are complementary to our business. Acquisitions have inherent risks which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or prospects, including, but not limited to: 1) failure to successfully integrate the business and financial operations, services, intellectual property, solutions or personnel of the acquired business; 2) diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; 3) entry into markets in which we have little or no direct prior experience; 4) failure to achieve projected synergies and performance targets; 5) loss of clients or key personnel of the acquired business; 6) incurrence of debt and/or assumption of known and unknown liabilities; 7) write-off of software development costs and amortization of expenses related to intangible assets; and, 8) dilutive issuances of equity securities. If we fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses or fail to implement our business strategies with respect to these acquisitions, we may not be able to achieve projected results or support the amount of consideration paid for such acquired businesses.

Risks Related to the Healthcare Information Technology, Healthcare Device and Healthcare Transaction Industry

The healthcare industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences. For example, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-32) contained significant changes to Medicare and Medicaid and had an impact for several years on healthcare providers’ ability to invest in capital intensive systems. In addition, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is having a direct impact on the healthcare industry by requiring identifiers and standardized transactions/code sets and necessary security and privacy measures in order to ensure the protection of protected health information. These regulatory factors affect the purchasing practices and operation of healthcare organizations. Federal and state legislatures have periodically considered programs to reform or amend the U.S. healthcare system at both the federal and state level and to change healthcare financing and reimbursement systems. These programs may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in healthcare, lower reimbursement rates or otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate. Healthcare industry participants may respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in our software solutions and services.

Many healthcare providers are consolidating to create integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power. These providers may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for our software solutions and services. As the healthcare industry consolidates, our client base could be eroded, competition for clients could become more intense and the importance of acquiring each client becomes greater.

The healthcare industry is highly regulated at the local, state and federal level. We are subject to a significant and wide-ranging number of regulations both within the United States and elsewhere, such as

regulations in the areas of: healthcare fraud, e-prescribing, claims processing and transmission, medical devices and the security and privacy of patient data.

Healthcare Fraud. Federal and state governments continue to strengthen their positions and scrutiny over practices involving healthcare fraud affecting healthcare providers whose services are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other government healthcare programs. Healthcare providers who are our clients are subject to laws and regulations on fraud and abuse which, among other things, prohibit the direct or indirect payment or receipt of any remuneration for patient referrals, or arranging for or recommending referrals or other business paid for in whole or in part by these federal or state healthcare programs. Federal enforcement personnel have substantial funding, powers and remedies to pursue suspected or perceived fraud and abuse. The effect of this government regulation on our clients is difficult to predict. While we believe that we are in substantial compliance with any applicable laws, many of the regulations applicable to our clients and that may be applicable to us, are vague or indefinite and have not been interpreted by the courts. They may be interpreted or applied by a prosecutorial, regulatory or judicial authority in a manner that could broaden their applicability to us or require our clients to make changes in their operations or the way in which they deal with us. If such laws and regulations are determined to be applicable to us and if we fail to comply with any applicable laws and regulations, we could be subject to sanctions or liability, including exclusion from government health programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

E-Prescribing. The use of our solutions by physicians for electronic prescribing, electronic routing of prescriptions to pharmacies and dispensing is governed by state and federal law. States have differing prescription format requirements, which we have programmed into our software. In addition, in November 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services announced regulations by CMS related to “E-Prescribing and the Prescription Drug Program” (“E-Prescribing Regulations”). These E-Prescribing Regulations were mandated by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. The E-Prescribing Regulations set forth standards for the transmission of electronic prescriptions. The final regulations adopted two standards effective January 2006. A second and final set of required standards are to be published no later than April 1, 2008 and implemented no later than April 1, 2009. These standards are detailed and significant, and cover not only transactions between prescribers and dispensers for prescriptions but also electronic eligibility and benefits inquiries and drug formulary and benefit coverage information. Our efforts to provide solutions that enable our clients to comply with these regulations could be time-consuming and expensive.

Claims Transmissions. Certain of our solutions assist our clients in submitting claims to payers, which claims are governed by federal and state laws. Our solutions are capable of electronically transmitting claims for services and items rendered by a physician to many patients’ payers for approval and reimbursement. Federal law provides civil liability to any person that knowingly submits a claim to a payer, including, for example, Medicare, Medicaid and private health plans, seeking payment for any services or items that have not been provided to the patient. Federal law may also impose criminal penalties for intentionally submitting such false claims. We have policies and procedures in place that we believe result in the accurate and complete transmission of claims, provided that the information given to us by our clients is also accurate and complete. The HIPAA security, privacy and transaction standards, as discussed below, also have a potentially significant effect on our claims transmission services, since those services must be structured and provided in a way that supports our clients’ HIPAA compliance obligations.

Regulation of Medical Devices. The United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) has declared that certain of our solutions are medical devices that are actively regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“Act”) and amendments to the Act. As a consequence, we are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA with regard to those solutions that are actively regulated. Other countries have similar regulations in place related to medical devices, that now or may in the future apply to certain of our solutions. If other of our solutions are deemed to be actively regulated medical devices by the FDA or similar regulatory agencies in countries where we do business, we could be subject to extensive requirements governing pre- and post-marketing requirements including pre-market notification clearance. Complying with these medical device regulations on a global perspective is time consuming and expensive. Further, it is possible that these regulatory agencies may become more active in regulating software that is used in healthcare.

There have been eight FDA inspections since 1998 at various Cerner sites. Inspections conducted at our world headquarters in 1999 and our prior Houston facility in 2002 each resulted in the issuance of an FDA Form 483 that we responded to promptly. The FDA has taken no further action with respect to either of the Form 483s that were issued in 1999 and 2002. The remaining six FDA inspections, including inspections at our world headquarters in 2006, resulted in no issuance of a Form 483. We remain subject to periodic FDA inspections and we could be required to undertake additional actions to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements. Our failure to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to manufacture and distribute our solutions. The FDA has many enforcement tools including recalls, seizures, injunctions, civil fines and/or criminal prosecutions. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Security and Privacy of Patient Information. State and federal laws regulate the confidentiality of patient records and the circumstances under which those records may be released. These regulations govern both the disclosure and use of confidential patient medical record information and require the users of such information to implement specified security measures. Regulations currently in place governing electronic health data transmissions continue to evolve and are often unclear and difficult to apply.

HIPAA requires national standards for some types of electronic health information transactions and the data elements used in those transactions, security standards to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of health information and standards to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. Covered entities under HIPAA, which include healthcare organizations such as our clients, were required to comply with the privacy standards by April 2003, the transaction regulations by October 2003 and the security regulations by April 2005. As a business associate of the covered entities, we, in most instances, must also ensure compliance with the HIPAA regulations as it pertains to our clients.

The effect of HIPAA on our business is difficult to predict, and there can be no assurances that we will adequately address the business risks created by HIPAA and its implementation, or that we will be able to take advantage of any resulting business opportunities. Furthermore, we are unable to predict what changes to HIPAA, or the regulations issued pursuant to HIPAA, might be made in the future or how those changes could affect our business or the costs of compliance with HIPAA. Evolving HIPAA-related laws or regulations could restrict the ability of our clients to obtain, use or disseminate patient information. This could adversely affect demand for our solutions if they are not re-designed in a timely manner in order to meet the requirements of any new regulations that seek to protect the privacy and security of patient data or enable our clients to execute new or modified healthcare transactions. We may need to expend additional capital, research and development and other resources to modify our solutions and devices to address these evolving data security and privacy issues.

We operate in intensely competitive and dynamic industries, and our ability to successfully compete and continue to grow our business depends on our ability to respond quickly to market changes and changing technologies and to bring competitive new solutions, devices, features and services to market in a timely fashion. The market for healthcare information systems, healthcare devices, healthcare transactions and life sciences consulting services are intensely competitive, dynamically evolving and subject to rapid technological and innovative changes. Development of new proprietary technology or services is complex, entails significant time and expense and may not be successful. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to introduce new solutions, devices or services on schedule, or at all, nor can we guarantee that, despite extensive testing, errors will not be found in our new solution releases, devices or services before or after commercial release, which could result in solution, device or service delivery redevelopment costs and loss of, or delay in, market acceptance.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in the healthcare information market include the ease of implementation, the breadth and quality of system and software solution offerings, the stability of the information system provider, the ongoing support for the system and the potential for enhancements and future compatible software solutions. Certain of our competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than us and some of our competitors offer software solutions that we do not offer. Our principal existing competitors in the healthcare solutions and services market include: Eclipsys Corporation, Epic Systems Corporation, GE Healthcare Technologies, iSoft Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Medical Information Technology, Inc. (“Meditech”), Misys Healthcare Systems and Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation, each of which offers a suite of

software solutions that compete with many of our software solutions and services. There are other competitors that offer a more limited number of competing software solutions and services, including, without limitation: Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Emdeon Corporation and Quality Systems, Inc. We view our principal competitors in the healthcare device market to include: Omnicell, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and McKesson Corporation; and we view our principal competitors in the healthcare transactions market to include: ProxyMed, Inc., Emdeon Corporation, McKesson Corporation and The TriZetto Group, Inc., with almost all of these competitors being substantially larger or having more experience and market share than us in their respective market.

In addition, we expect that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and system integrators, Internet-based start-up companies and others specializing in the healthcare industry may offer competitive software solutions, devices or services. The pace of change in the healthcare information systems market is rapid and there are frequent new software solution introductions, software solution enhancements, device introductions, device enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, our success will depend upon our ability to keep pace with technological change and to introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new and enhanced software solutions, devices and services that satisfy changing client requirements and achieve market acceptance.

Risks Related to the Company’s Stock

Our quarterly operating results may vary which could adversely affect our stock price. Our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in future periods, including, variations from guidance, expectations or historical results or trends. Quarterly operating results may vary for a number of reasons including accounting policy changes, any material weaknesses identified in our internal controls, demand for our solutions, devices and services, the financial condition of our clients and potential clients, our long sales cycle, potentially long installation and implementation cycles for larger, more complex and higher-priced systems and other factors described in this section and elsewhere in this report. As a result of healthcare industry trends and the market for our Cerner Millennium solutions, a large percentage of our revenues are generated by the sale and installation of larger, more complex and higher-priced systems. The sales process for these systems is lengthy and involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources by the client. Sales may be subject to delays due to changes in clients’ internal budgets, procedures for approving large capital expenditures, competing needs for other capital expenditures, availability of personnel resources and by actions taken by competitors. Delays in the expected sale, installation or implementation of these large systems may have a significant impact on our anticipated quarterly revenues and consequently our earnings, since a significant percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed.

We recognize software revenue upon the completion of standard milestone conditions and the amount of revenue recognized in any quarter depends upon our and our clients’ abilities to meet project milestones. Delays in meeting these milestone conditions or modification of the contract could result in a shift of revenue recognition from one quarter to another and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for a particular quarter.

Our revenues from system sales historically have been lower in the first quarter of the year and greater in the fourth quarter of the year, primarily as a result of clients’ year-end efforts to make all final capital expenditures for the then-current year.

Our sales forecasts may vary from actual sales in a particular quarter. We use a “pipeline” system, a common industry practice, to forecast sales and trends in our business. Our sales associates monitor the status of all sales opportunities, such as the date when they estimate that a client will make a purchase decision and the potential dollar amount of the sale. These estimates are aggregated periodically to generate a sales pipeline. We compare this pipeline at various points in time to evaluate trends in our business. This analysis provides guidance in business planning and forecasting, but these pipeline estimates are by their nature speculative. Our pipeline estimates are not necessarily reliable predictors of revenues in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time, partially because of changes in the pipeline and in conversion rates of the pipeline into contracts that can be very difficult to estimate. A negative variation in the expected conversion rate or timing of the pipeline into contracts, or in the pipeline itself, could cause our plan or forecast to be inaccurate and thereby adversely affect business

results. For example, a slowdown in information technology spending, adverse economic conditions or a variety of other factors can cause purchasing decisions to be delayed, reduced in amount or cancelled, which would reduce the overall pipeline conversion rate in a particular period of time. Because a substantial portion of our contracts are completed in the latter part of a quarter, we may not be able to adjust our cost structure quickly enough in response to a revenue shortfall resulting from a decrease in our pipeline conversion rate in any given fiscal
quarter(s).

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile. The market for our common stock may experience significant price and volume fluctuations in response to a number of factors including actual or anticipated variations in operating results, rumors about our performance or solutions, devices and services, changes in expectations of future financial performance or estimates of securities analysts, governmental regulatory action, healthcare reform measures, client relationship developments, changes occurring in the securities markets in general and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. As a matter of policy, we do not generally comment on our stock price or rumors.

Furthermore, the stock market in general, and the markets for software, healthcare and information technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, regardless of actual operating performance.

Our Directors have authority to issue preferred stock and our corporate governance documents contain anti-takeover provisions. Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the preferences, rights and privileges of those shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of common stock may be harmed by rights granted to the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future.

In addition, some provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could make it more difficult for a potential acquirer to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions that: provide for a classified board of directors, prohibit shareholders from taking action by written consent and restrict the ability of shareholders to call special meetings. We are also subject to provisions of Delaware law that prohibit us from engaging in any business combination with any interested shareholder for a period of three years from the date the person became an interested shareholder, unless certain conditions are met, which could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control.

Factors that may Affect Future Results of Operations, Financial Condition or Business
Statements made in this report, the Annual Report to Shareholders in which this report is made a part, other reports and proxy statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, communications to shareholders, press releases and oral statements made by representatives of the Company that are not historical in nature, or that state the Company’s or management’s intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions of the future, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “could,” “should,” “will,” “intended,” “continue,” “believe,” “may,” “expect,” “hope,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “plan,” “guidance” or “estimate” or the negative of these words, variations thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. It is important to note that any such performance and actual results, financial condition or business, could differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere herein or in other reports filed with the SEC. Other unforeseen factors not identified herein could also have such an effect. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in future operating results, financial condition or business over time.

Item 2. Properties

World Headquarters

Our world headquarters offices are located in a Company-owned office park in North Kansas City, Missouri, containing approximately 1,006,467 gross square feet of useable space (the “Campus”), inclusive of the new data center and clinic buildings described below. As of December 30, 2006, we were

using approximately 867,619 square feet of such useable space for our U.S. corporate headquarter operations and 3,687 square feet of the remaining space was leased to Executive Travel, a third party company.

In February 2006, we completed construction on the Campus of a 13,136 square foot addition to the 2901 Rockcreek Parkway building to house Health e Clinic, a wholly-owned subsidiary, which provides primary care services for our associates and their family members.

In 2006, the Company began construction of the world headquarters Technology Center, a 135,161 square foot data center facility on the Campus. Construction is expected to be complete June 2007.

In 2004, we purchased approximately 12 acres of unimproved real estate adjacent to the Campus for campus expansion. This land was purchased to provide a secondary entry into the Campus and to provide for future building development as needed. The first phase of development was the roadway extension and second entry point into the Campus. The second phase of development is the data center facility described above. Future development of this land is undetermined at this time.

Other Properties

In February 2007, we entered into a long-term lease for 480,700 gross square feet of property located in Kansas City, Missouri. The office space, known as the Innovation Campus, will house associates from our intellectual property organizations.

In June 2005, we purchased 263,512 gross square feet of property located in Kansas City, Missouri. The office space, known as the Cerner Oaks Campus, houses associates from the CernerWorks and TechnologyWorks groups and associates of Cerner’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Health e Exchange.

We also own property located along the north riverbank of the Missouri River, approximately two miles from the Campus. This property consists of a 96,318 gross square foot building and a 1,300-car parking garage. The building has been renovated for use as a corporate training, meeting and event center for the Company and third parties. We have also made use of the parking garage to meet overflow-parking demands on the Campus.

In 2006, we acquired leases on two additional offices in Sterling, Virginia and Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, as part of the Galt Associates, Inc. acquisition.

As of the end of February 2007, the Company leased office space in: Birmingham, Alabama; Beverly Hills and Garden Grove, California; Denver, Colorado; Overland Park, Kansas; Waltham, Massachusetts; Bel Air, Maryland; Minneapolis and Rochester, Minnesota; Kansas City, Missouri; Charlotte, North Carolina; Beaverton, Oregon; Blue Bell, Pennsylvania; and Sterling and Vienna, Virginia. The Company operates its primary solutions center (or data center) in leased space in Lee’s Summit, Missouri. Globally, the Company also leases office space in: Sydney and Melbourne, Australia; Brussels, Belgium; London-Ontario, Canada; Paris, France; Aachen and Idstein, Germany; Hong Kong; Bangalore, India; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Ngee Ann City, Singapore; Barcelona and Madrid, Spain; London and Slough, United Kingdom; and, Abu Dhabi and Dubai Internet City, United Arab Emirates.

In 2006, our Daytona Beach, Florida office was closed as we relocated many associates and/or the necessary business functions to other Company offices.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We have no material pending litigation.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders of the Company during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006.

PART II

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

Cerner Corporation (“Cerner” or the “Company”) is headquartered in North Kansas City, Missouri. The Company primarily derives revenue by selling, implementing and supporting software solutions, hardware, healthcare devices and services that give healthcare providers secure access to clinical, administrative and financial data in real time, allowing them to improve the quality, safety and efficiency in the delivery of healthcare. We implement the healthcare solutions as stand-alone, combined or enterprise-wide systems. Cerner Millennium software solutions can be managed by the Company’s clients or in the Company’s data center via a managed services model.

Results Overview

The Company delivered strong results in 2006. Total revenues for 2006 were $1,378,038,000, an increase of 19% over 2005 revenues of $1,160,785,000. Net Earnings for 2006 were $109,891,000, an increase of 27% over 2005 net earnings of $86,251,000. Total new business bookings, which reflect the value of executed contracts for software, hardware, content subscriptions, services and managed services (hosting of clients’ software in the Company’s data center), was a Company record at $1,469,300,000 in 2006, an increase of 8% compared to $1,355,000,000 in 2005.

In 2006, the Company generated $232,718,000 of cash flow from operations, with record cash collections of approximately $1,457,600,000 and days sales outstanding (DSO) decreasing from 89 days at the end of 2005 to 87 days at the end of 2006.

Healthcare Information Technology Market

2006 continued a trend of positive developments in the healthcare information technology (HIT) marketplace and for the Company. Around the world, healthcare costs continue to rise as healthcare professionals work to uphold quality standards. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has reported that, in the United States, healthcare represents 16 percent of the gross national product, which they project will reach 20 percent by 2015. In this climate, HIT is broadly seen as a way to curb these growing costs while improving the quality of care.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 30, 2006, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005

The Company’s net earnings increased 27% to $109,891,000 in 2006 compared to $86,251,000 in 2005. Net earnings for 2006 include adjustments for approximately $1,994,000 of tax benefit for items relating to prior periods. 2006 net earnings also reflect the impact of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the expensing of stock options. Adoption of SFAS 123R reduced 2006 net earnings by $11,746,000 (net of taxes). Net earnings for 2005 included an adjustment in the third quarter of 2005 related to a prior period for a tax benefit from the carry back of a capital loss generated by the sale of Zynx Health Incorporated (Zynx) of $4,794,000 and the write-off of acquired in-process research and development in the first quarter of 2005 of $3,941,000, net of a $2,441,000 tax benefit. Adjusting for these items, 2006 net earnings increased 40% to $119,643,000 compared to 2005 net earnings of $85,398,000.

Revenues - The Company’s revenues increased 19% to $1,378,038,000 in 2006 from $1,160,785,000 in 2005. The revenue composition for 2006 was $505,743,000 in system sales, $340,416,000 in support and maintenance, $492,828,000 in services and $39,051,000 in reimbursed travel.

System sales increased 12% to $505,743,000 in 2006 from $449,734,000 in 2005. Included in system sales are revenues from the sale of software, hardware and sublicensed software, installation fees, transaction processing and subscriptions. System sales growth in 2006 was driven by strong growth of software, hardware and subscriptions.

Support, maintenance and service revenues increased 23% to $833,244,000 in 2006 from $677,664,000 in 2005. Support and maintenance revenues were $340,416,000 and $296,716,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Services revenues were $492,828,000 and $380,948,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in support, maintenance and service revenues are support and maintenance of software and hardware, professional services, excluding installation and remote hosting services. These increases were driven by strong performance in delivering Cerner Millennium solutions to clients and the continued success of the CernerWorks remote hosting services.

Contract backlog, which reflects new business bookings that have not yet been recognized as revenue, increased 27% in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase is due to a strong increase in new business bookings in 2006 compared to 2005. At December 30, 2006, the Company had $2,194,460,000 in contract backlog and $469,473,000 in support and maintenance backlog, compared to $1,724,583,000 in contract backlog and $415,681,000 in support and maintenance backlog at the end of 2005.

Cost of Revenues - The cost of revenues includes the cost of reimbursed travel expense, third party consulting services and subscription content, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from hardware and software manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. The cost of revenues was 21% of total revenues in 2006 and 22% of total revenues in 2005. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, services and support) components carrying different margin rates changes from period to period. The decrease in the cost of revenue as a percent of total revenues resulted principally from strong levels of software sales and strong growth in services that do not have a high level of associated third party costs.

Sales and Client Service - Sales and client service expenses include salaries of client service personnel, communications expenses and unreimbursed travel expenses. Also included are sales and marketing salaries, travel expenses, tradeshow costs and advertising costs. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 42% and 40% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in total sales and client service expenses to $578,050,000 in 2006 from $466,206,000 in 2005 was primarily due to an increase in personnel expenses associated with the strong growth in our professional services and managed services businesses and an increased presence in the global market. In addition, 2006 sales and client service expense includes $11,412,000 of expense related to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Software Development - Software development expenses include salaries, documentation and other direct expenses incurred in software development and amortization of software development costs. Total expenditures for software development, including both capitalized and noncapitalized portions, for 2006 and 2005 were $262,163,000 and $225,606,000, respectively. Capitalized software costs were $60,943,000 and $62,039,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Amortization of capitalized software costs was $45,750,000 and $47,888,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, leading to total recognized software development expense of $246,970,000 and $211,455,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in aggregate expenditures in software development in 2006 was due to continued development of Cerner Millennium solutions. In addition, 2006 software development expense includes $4,269,000 of expense related to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

General and Administrative - General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees and the transaction gains or losses on foreign currency. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 7% in both 2006 and 2005. Total general and administrative expenses were $95,881,000 and $81,620,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company had net transaction gains on foreign currency of $3,764,000 for 2006 compared to $2,700,000 for 2005. 2006 general and administrative expense includes $3,340,000 of expense related to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Interest Expense, Net – Net interest expense was $697,000 in 2006 compared to $5,858,000 in 2005. Interest income increased to $11,877,000 in 2006 from $3,871,000 in 2005, due primarily to higher interest rates and a higher cash balance. Interest expense increased to $12,574,000 in 2006 from $9,729,000 in 2005, due primarily to a higher level of debt during 2006.

Other Income, Net - Other income was $2,074,000 in 2006 compared to $666,000 in 2005. Included in other income is income from office space leased to third parties. 2006 other income also includes a gain recorded in the first quarter of 2006 related to the renegotiation of a supplier contract that eliminated a

liability related to unfavorable future commitments due to that supplier. The Company was able to renegotiate the contract to eliminate certain minimum volume requirements and reduce pricing to market rates leading to the elimination of the previously recorded liability. The increase in other income in 2006 was driven by this gain and by higher lease income.

Income Taxes - The Company’s effective tax rate was 34% and 36% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Tax expense for 2006 includes benefits of approximately $1,994,000 for adjustments relating to prior periods. Tax expense for 2005 includes an adjustment that reduced tax expense related to a prior period for a tax benefit from the carry back of a capital loss generated by the sale of Zynx of $4,749,000. Adjusting for these items, the effective tax rates were 36% and 40% in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Operations by Segment

The Company has two operating segments, Domestic and Global. Beginning in 2006 we began allocating certain expenses related to our managed services that were previously classified as Other to the geographic segment to which they relate. As a result, the prior periods have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the change in reportable segments.

The following table presents a summary of the operating information for 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

percent of total revenues was driven by a much higher level of global hardware sales in 2006 compared to 2005. Operating expenses in the 2006 period increased $59,473,000 compared to the 2005 period primarily due to hiring personnel for the projects in England and supporting growth in other global regions.

Operating losses in Other increased $76,204,000 for the year ended December 30, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. Included in Other are revenues and expenses not tracked by geographic segment. Operating expenses increased $75,778,000 in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase in operating expenses is due to an increase in expenses such as software development, marketing, general and administrative, share-based compensation expense and depreciation. Operating expenses in the 2005 period includes the write-off of acquired in-process research and development of $6,382,000.

Year Ended December 31, 2005, Compared to Year Ended January 1, 2005

The Company’s net earnings increased 33% to $86,251,000 in 2005 compared to $64,648,000 in 2004. Net earnings for 2005 included an adjustment in the third quarter of 2005 related to a prior period for a tax benefit from the carry back of a capital loss generated by the sale of Zynx of $4,749,000 and the write-off of acquired in-process research and development in the first quarter of 2005 of $3,941,000, net of a $2,441,000 tax benefit. Included in 2004 net earnings are an adjustment in the third quarter of 2004 related to a prior period vacation pay accrual that reduced net earnings by $2,076,000, net of $1,270,000 of tax, and a gain on the sale of Zynx, in the first quarter of 2004 that increased net earnings by $3,023,000. Excluding these four items, 2005 net earnings would have increased 34% to $85,443,000 compared to 2004 net earnings of $63,701,000.

Revenues - The Company’s revenues increased 25% to $1,160,785,000 in 2005 from $926,356,000 in 2004. Revenues for 2005 included revenues from the acquired medical business division of VitalWorks, Inc. (VitalWorks), which closed on January 3, 2005 . Excluding the revenue from the medical business division of VitalWorks, 2005 revenues increased 18% over 2004. The revenue composition for 2005 was $449,734,000 in system sales, $296,716,000 in support and maintenance, $380,948,000 in services and $33,387,000 in reimbursed travel.

System sales increased 28% to $449,734,000 in 2005 from $351,861,000 in 2004. Included in system sales are revenues from the sale of software, hardware and sublicensed software, installation fees, transaction processing and subscriptions, with each component growing at least 12% in 2005. This increase is due primarily to an increase in new business bookings and the inclusion of revenue from the medical business division of VitalWorks in 2005. Excluding revenue from the medical business division of VitalWorks, system sales would have increased 17%.

Support, maintenance and service revenues increased 25% to $677,664,000 in 2005 from $542,414,000 in 2004. Support and maintenance revenues were $296,716,000 and $241,439,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Services revenues were $380,948,000 and $300,975,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Included in support, maintenance and service revenues are support and maintenance of software and hardware, professional services excluding installation, and managed services. These increases were driven by strong performance in delivering Cerner Millennium solutions to clients and the inclusion of revenue from the acquired medical business division of VitalWorks. Excluding revenue from the medical business division of VitalWorks, support, maintenance and service sales would have increased 19%.

Contract backlog, which reflects new business bookings that have not yet been recognized as revenue, increased 45% in 2005 compared to 2004. This increase is due to an increase in new business bookings in 2005 compared to 2004. At December 31, 2005, the Company had $1,724,583,000 in contract backlog and $415,681,000 in support and maintenance backlog, compared to $1,191,170,000 in contract backlog and $347,662,000 in support and maintenance backlog at the end of 2004.

Cost of Revenues - The cost of revenues includes the cost of reimbursed travel expense, third party consulting services and subscription content, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from hardware and software manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. The cost of revenues was 22% of total revenues in 2005 and 21% of total revenues in 2004. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, services and support) components carrying different margin rates changes from period to period. The increase in the

cost of revenue as a percent of total revenues resulted principally from higher levels of hardware sales at lower than historical levels of margin for hardware.

Sales and Client Service - Sales and client service expenses include salaries of client service personnel, communications expenses and unreimbursed travel expenses. Also included are sales and marketing salaries, travel expenses, tradeshow costs and advertising costs. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 40% and 41% in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in total sales and client service expenses to $466,206,000 in 2005 from $383,628,000 in 2004 was primarily due to an increase in personnel, personnel related expenses and increased presence in the global market. The decrease in this spending as a percent of total revenue reflects the Company’s ability to get better utilization of its resources and leverage this spending over a larger revenue stream.

Software Development - Software development expenses include salaries, documentation and other direct expenses incurred in software development and amortization of software development costs. Total expenditures for software development, including both capitalized and noncapitalized portions, for 2005 and 2004 were $225,606,000 and $188,264,000, respectively. These amounts exclude amortization. Capitalized software costs were $62,039,000 and $58,912,000 for 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in aggregate expenditures in software development in 2005 was due to continued development of Cerner Millennium solutions.

General and Administrative - General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees and the transaction gains or losses on foreign currency. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 7% in both 2005 and 2004. Total general and administrative expenses were $81,620,000 and $63,327,000 for 2005 and 2004, respectively. General and administrative expenses for 2004 include an adjustment to increase the vacation pay accrual of $3,346,000, related to prior periods. Excluding the adjustment to increase the vacation pay accrual, general and administrative expenses as a percent of revenues were 6% in 2004. The Company had net transaction gains on foreign currency of $2,700,000 for 2005 compared to net transaction losses on foreign currency of $479,000 for 2004.

The write-off of in-process research and development in 2005 is an expense resulting from the acquired medical business division of VitalWorks.

Interest Expense, Net - Interest income was $3,871,000 in 2005 compared to $3,022,000 in 2004. This increase is due primarily to higher interest rates, and a higher cash balance fed by cash collections. Interest expense was $9,729,000 in 2005 compared to $9,174,000 in 2004.

Other Income, Net - Other income was $666,000 in 2005 compared to $2,608,000 in 2004. Other income in 2004 included a gain on the sale of Zynx. Also included in other income are revenues from office space leased to third parties.

Income Taxes - The Company’s effective tax rate was 36% and 40% in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Tax expense for 2005 includes an adjustment that reduced tax expense related to a prior period for a tax benefit from the carry back of a capital loss generated by the sale of Zynx of $4,749,000. Excluding this adjustment, the Company’s effective tax rate was 40% for 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s liquidity is influenced by many factors, including the amount and timing of the Company’s revenues, its cash collections from its clients and the amounts the Company invests in software development, acquisitions and capital expenditures.

The Company’s principal source of liquidity is its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents consist of U.S. Government Federal Agency Securities, short-term marketable securities and overnight repurchase agreements. At December 30, 2006 the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $162,545,000, short-term investments of $146,239,000 and working capital of $444,656,000 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $113,057,000, short-term investments of $161,230,000 and working capital of $391,541,000 at December 31, 2005.

The Company generated cash of $232,718,000, $228,865,000 and $168,304,000 from operations in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Cash flow from operations increased in 2006 due primarily to a stronger performance in net earnings and increased collections of receivables. The Company has periodically provided long-term financing options to creditworthy clients through third party financing institutions and has directly provided extended payment terms to clients from contract date. These extended payment term arrangements typically provide for date based payments over periods ranging from 12 months to five years. Pursuant to SOP 97-2, because a significant portion of the fee is due beyond one year, we have analyzed our history with these types of arrangements and have concluded that we do have a standard business practice of using extended payment term arrangements and have a long history of successfully collecting under the original payment terms for arrangements with similar clients, product offerings, and economics without granting concessions. Accordingly, we consider the fee to be fixed and determinable in these extended payment term arrangements and, thus, the timing of revenue is not impacted by the existence of extended payments. Some of these payment streams have been assigned on a non-recourse basis to third party financing institutions. The Company has provided its usual and customary performance guarantees to the third party financing institutions in connection with its on-going obligations under the client contract. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company received total client cash collections of $1,457,600,000, $1,200,595,000 and $937,600,000, respectively, of which approximately 8%, 7% and 6% were received from third party client financing arrangements and non-recourse payment assignments. Days sales outstanding decreased from 89 days at the end of 2005 to 87 days at the end of 2006. Revenues provided under support and maintenance agreements represent recurring cash flows. Support and maintenance revenues increased 15% in 2006 and 23% in 2005, and the Company expects these revenues to continue to grow as the base of installed systems grows.

Cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of the purchase of short-term investments of $161,230,000 in 2005, the acquisition of businesses of $13,731,000 in 2006 and $119,683,000 in 2005, capitalized software development costs of $61,223,000 and $62,523,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively and purchases of capital equipment, land and buildings of $131,478,000 and $100,583,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2006, a source of cash in investing activities consisted of net proceeds from the sale of investment of $29,112,000.

The Company’s financing activities for 2006 primarily consisted of proceeds from the exercise of options of $21,704,000 and repayment of long-term debt of $30,783,000. In 2005 the Company’s financing activities consisted primarily of the repayment of proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $111,827,000 and the proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $51,744,000, and repayment of a revolving line of credit and long-term debt of $91,848,000 and proceeds from a revolving line of credit of $70,000,000.

In November 2005, the Company completed a £65,000,000 ($127,322,000 at December 30, 2006) private placement of debt at 5.54% pursuant to a Note Agreement. The Note Agreement is payable in seven equal annual installments beginning in November 2009. The proceeds were used to repay the outstanding amount under the Company’s credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The Note Agreement contains certain net worth and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 30, 2006.

In December 2002, the Company completed a $60,000,000 private placement of debt pursuant to a Note Agreement. The Series A Senior Notes, with a $21,000,000 principal amount at 5.57%, are payable in three equal installments that commenced in December 2006. The Series B Senior notes, with a

$39,000,000 principal amount at 6.42%, are payable in four equal annual installments beginning December 2009. The proceeds were used to repay the outstanding amount under the Company’s credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The Note Agreement contains certain net worth and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 30, 2006.

In May 2002, the Company expanded its credit facility by entering into an unsecured credit agreement with a group of banks led by US Bank. This agreement was amended and restated on November 30, 2006 and provides for a current revolving line of credit for working capital purposes. The current revolving line of credit is unsecured and requires monthly payments of interest only. Interest is payable at the Company’s option at a rate based on prime (8.25% at December 30, 2006) or LIBOR (5.32% at December 30, 2006) plus 1.55%. The interest rate may be reduced by up to 1.15% if certain net worth ratios are maintained. The agreement contains certain net worth, current ratio, and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. A commitment fee of 2/10% is payable quarterly based on the usage of the revolving line of credit. The revolving line of credit matures on May 31, 2010. On January 10, 2005, the Company drew down $35,000,000 from its revolving line of credit in connection with the acquisition of the medical business division of VitalWorks. (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.) This amount was paid in full as of December 31, 2005. At December 30, 2006, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this agreement and had $90,000,000 available for working capital purposes. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 30, 2006.

In April 1999, the Company completed a $100,000,000 private placement of debt pursuant to a Note Agreement. The Series A Senior Notes, with a $60,000,000 principal amount at 7.14%, were paid in full in 2006. The Series B Senior Notes, with a $40,000,000 principal amount at 7.66%, are payable in six equal annual installments which commenced in April 2004. The proceeds were used to retire the Company’s existing $30,000,000 of debt, and the remaining funds were used for capital improvements and to strengthen the Company’s cash position. The Note Agreement contains certain net worth, current ratio, and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 30, 2006.

The Company believes that its present cash position, together with cash generated from operations and, if necessary, its lines of credit, will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements during 2007.

The following table represents a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments, excluding interest, as of December 30, 2006, except short-term purchase order commitments arising in the ordinary course of business.

The Company is currently constructing a new data center on its campus in North Kansas City, Missouri at an approximate cost of $60,000,000 of which approximately $34,000,000 has been spent as of December 30, 2006. This commitment is not included in the above table. The construction is expected to be completed in 2007.

The effects of inflation on the Company’s business during 2006, 2005 and 2004 were not significant.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”), which provides interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB 108 allows registrants to record a one time cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the year of adoption to correct errors existing in prior years deemed to be material in the current year that previously had been considered immaterial. SAB 108 is effective for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2006. The Company assessed the impact of adoption of SAB 108 on its consolidated financial statements and determined there were no uncorrected misstatements deemed to be material under the new interpretive guidance provided in SAB108.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax-return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. FIN 48 also prescribes a method for computing the tax benefit of such tax positions to be recognized in the financial statements. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of FIN 48 on its results of operations and its financial position and was required to adopt FIN 48 as of the first day of the 2007 fiscal year.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company believes that there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding the Company’s historical and future performance, as these policies affect the reported amount of revenue and other significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, software development, concentrations, allowance for doubtful accounts and potential impairments of goodwill. These policies and the Company’s procedures related to these policies are described in detail below and under specific areas within this “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” In addition, Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements expands upon discussion of the Company’s accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes its multiple element arrangements, including software and software-related services, using the residual method under SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP No. 98-4, SOP 98-9 and clarified by Staff Accounting Bulletin’s (SAB) 101 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” and SAB No. 104 “Revenue Recognition” and Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). Key factors in the Company’s revenue recognition model are management’s assessments that installation services are essential to the functionality of the Company’s software whereas implementation services are not; and the length of time it takes for the Company to achieve its delivery and installation milestones for its licensed software. If the Company’s business model were to change such that implementation services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the Company’s software, the period of time over which the Company’s licensed software revenue would be recognized would lengthen. The Company generally recognizes combined revenue from the sale of its licensed software and related installation services over two key milestones, delivery and installation, based on percentages that reflect the underlying effort from planning to installation. Additionally, if the time to achieve the Company’s delivery and installation milestones for its licensed software were to be accelerated or decelerated, its milestones would be adjusted and the timing of revenue recognition for its licensed software could materially change.

Software Development Costs

Costs incurred internally in creating computer software solutions and enhancements to those solutions are expensed until completion of a detailed program design, which is when the Company determines that technological feasibility has been established. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized until such time as the software solutions and enhancements are available for general release, and the capitalized costs subsequently are reported at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is computed as the estimated gross future revenues from each software solution less the amount of estimated future costs of completing and disposing of that product. Because the development of projected net future revenues related to our software solutions used in our net realizable value computation is based on estimates, a significant reduction in our future revenues could impact the realizability of our capitalized software development costs. We historically have not experienced significant inaccuracies in computing the net realizable value of our software solutions and the difference

between the net realizable value and the unamortized cost has grown over the past three years. We expect that trend to continue in the future. If we missed our estimates of net future revenues by up to 10%, the amount of our capitalized software development costs would not be impaired. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and expected net future revenue for each software solution with minimum annual amortization equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated economic life of the software solution. The Company is amortizing capitalized costs over five years. The five year period over which capitalized software development costs are amortized is an estimate based upon the Company’s forecast of a reasonable useful life for the capitalized costs. Historically, use of the Company’s software programs by its clients has exceeded five years and is capable of being used a decade or more.

The Company expects that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and systems integrators and others specializing in the healthcare industry may offer competitive products or services. The pace of change in the healthcare information technology market is rapid and there are frequent new product introductions, product enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, the capitalized software solutions may become less valuable or obsolete and could be subject to impairment.

Concentrations

Substantially all of the Company’s clients are integrated delivery networks, physicians, hospitals and other healthcare related organizations. If significant adverse macro-economic factors were to impact these organizations it could materially adversely affect the Company. The Company’s access to certain software and hardware components is dependent upon single and sole source suppliers. The inability of any supplier to fulfill supply requirements of the Company could affect future results.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

If the creditworthiness of the Company’s clients were to weaken or the Company’s collections results relative to historical experience were to decline, it could have a material adverse impact on operations and cash flows.

Goodwill

The Company accounts for its goodwill under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” As a result, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever there is an impairment indicator. All goodwill is assigned to a reporting unit, where it is subject to an impairment test based on fair value. The Company again assessed its goodwill for impairment in the second quarters of 2006 and 2005 and concluded that no goodwill was impaired. The Company used a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of the reporting units for all periods. The Company completed nine acquisitions and one divestiture subsequent to June 30, 2001, which resulted in approximately $106 million of goodwill that was not amortized in accordance with SFAS 142. Goodwill amounted to $128,819,000 and $116,142,000 at December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. If future, anticipated cash flows from the Company’s reporting units that recognized goodwill do not materialize as expected the Company’s goodwill could be impaired, which would result in significant write-offs.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

At December 30, 2006, the Company had a £65,000,000 note payable outstanding through a private placement with an interest rate of 5.54%. The note is payable in seven equal installments beginning in November 2009. Because the borrowing is denominated in pounds, the Company is exposed to movements in the foreign currency exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Great Britain pound. Changes in the portion of the foreign-denominated debt that was not designated as a hedging instrument were included in foreign currency transaction gains and losses and were immaterial in 2006.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Financial Statements and Notes required by this Item are submitted as a separate part of this report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9.A. Controls and Procedures

	a)		Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report (the “Evaluation Date”). They have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities and would be disclosed on a timely basis. The CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. They have also concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
	b)		There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended December 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.
	c)		The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at that reasonable assurance level. However, the Company’s management can provide no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can prevent all errors and all fraud under all circumstances. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been or will be detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2006. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The Company’s management has concluded that, as of December 30, 2006, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in the annual report has issued an audit report on the Company’s assessment of its internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein under “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.

Item 9.B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Earl H. Devanny, III joined the Company in August of 1999 as President. Mr. Devanny also served as interim President of Cerner Southeast from January 2003 through July 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Devanny served as president of ADAC Healthcare Information Systems, Inc. Prior to joining ADAC, Mr. Devanny served as a Vice President of the Company from 1994 to 1997. Prior to that he spent 17 years with IBM Corporation.

Paul M. Black joined the Company in February of 1994 as a Regional Vice President. He was promoted in June 1998 to Senior Vice President and in January 1999 to Chief Sales Officer and to Executive Vice President in September of 2000. In January of 2003 Mr. Black was named Executive Vice President of the U.S. Client Organization. In February 2005 Mr. Black was named Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the Company, he spent 12 years with IBM Corporation.

Douglas M. Krebs joined the Company in June 1994 as a Regional Vice President. He was promoted to Senior Vice President and Area Manager in April 1999. In February 2000, Mr. Krebs was appointed as President of Cerner Global and in January 2005, Mr. Krebs was appointed General Manager of the Company’s Europe, Middle East and Asia Pacific Organization. Prior to joining Cerner, he spent 15 years with IBM Corporation.

Marc G. Naughton joined the Company in November 1992 as Manager of Taxes. In November 1995 he was named Chief Financial Officer and in February 1996 he was promoted to Vice President. He was promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2002.

Jeffrey A. Townsend joined the Company in June 1985. Since that time he has held several positions in the Intellectual Property Organization and was promoted to Vice President in February 1997. He was appointed Chief Engineering Officer in March 1998, promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2001 and promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2005.

Mike Valentine joined the Company in December 1998 as Director of Technology. He was promoted to Vice President in 2000 and to President of Cerner Mid America in January of 2003. In February 2005, he was named General Manager of the U.S. Client Organization and was promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2005. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Valentine was with Accenture Consulting.

Randy D. Sims joined the Company in March 1997 as Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sims worked at Farmland Industries, Inc. for three years where he served most recently as Associate General Counsel. Prior to Farmland, Mr. Sims was in-house legal counsel at The Marley Company for seven years, holding the position of Assistant General Counsel when he left to join Farmland.

Julia M. Wilson joined the Company in November 1995. Since that time, she has held several positions in the Functional Group Organization. She was promoted to Vice President and Chief People Officer in August 2003.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item 11 concerning our executive compensation will be set forth under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference. The information required by this Item 11 concerning Compensation Committee interlocks and Insider Participation will be set forth under the caption “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference. The information required by this Item 11 concerning Compensation Committee report will be set forth under the caption “Compensation Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference.

Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item 12 will be set forth under the caption “Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 12 by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item 13 concerning our transactions with related parties will be set forth under the caption “Certain Transactions” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 13 by reference. The information required by this Item 13 concerning director independence will be set forth under the caption “Director Independence” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 13 by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item 14 will be set forth under the caption “Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 25, 2007, and is incorporated in this Item 14 by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		CERNER CORPORATION
Dated: February 28, 2007		By:		/s/Neal L. Patterson   Neal L. Patterson
				Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature and Title				Date
/s/Neal L. Patterson   Neal L. Patterson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)				February 28, 2007
/s/Clifford W. Illig   Clifford W. Illig, Vice Chairman and Director				February 28, 2007
/s/Marc G. Naughton   Marc G. Naughton, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)				February 28, 2007
/s/Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr.   Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., Ph.D., Director				February 28, 2007
/s/John C. Danforth   John C. Danforth, Director				February 28, 2007
/s/Nancy-Ann DeParle   Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director				February 28, 2007
/s/Michael E. Herman   Michael E. Herman, Director				February 28, 2007
/s/William B. Neaves   William B. Neaves, Ph.D., Director				February 28, 2007
/s/William D. Zollars   William D. Zollars, Director				February 28, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cerner Corporation:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting , appearing in Item 9.A. Controls and Procedures, that Cerner Corporation (the Corporation) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Cerner Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Cerner Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2006, and our report dated February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

(signed) KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 28, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cerner Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries (the Corporation) as of December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” effective January 1, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Cerner Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
February 28, 2007

Management’s Report

The management of Cerner Corporation is responsible for the consolidated financial statements and all other information presented in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances, and, therefore, included in the financial statements are certain amounts based on management’s informed estimates and judgments. Other financial information in this report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Cerner Corporation’s independent registered public accountants and have been reviewed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cerner Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

(b) Nature of Operations - The Company designs, develops, markets, installs, hosts and supports software information technology, healthcare devices and content solutions for healthcare organizations and consumers. The Company also provides a wide range of value-added services, including implementing solutions as individual, combined or enterprise-wide systems; hosting solutions in its data center; and clinical process optimization services.

(c) Revenue Recognition - Revenues are derived primarily from the sale of clinical, financial and administrative information systems and solutions. The components of the system sales revenues are the licensing of computer software, installation, content subscriptions, transaction processing and the sale of computer hardware and sublicensed software. The components of support, maintenance and service revenues are software support and hardware maintenance, remote hosting and managed services, training, consulting and implementation services. The Company provides several models for the procurement of its clinical, financial and administrative information systems. The predominant method is a perpetual software license agreement, project-related installation services, implementation and consulting services, software support and either remote hosting services or computer hardware and sublicensed software.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-4, SOP 98-9 and clarified by Staff Accounting Bulletin’s (SAB) 101 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” and SAB No. 104 “Revenue Recognition” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21 “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). SOP 97-2, as amended, generally requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple-elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of those elements if fair values exist for all elements of the arrangement. Pursuant to SOP 98-9, the Company recognizes revenue from multiple-element software arrangements using the residual method. Under the residual method, revenue is recognized in a multiple-element arrangement when Company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement (i.e. professional services, software support, hardware maintenance, hardware and sublicensed software), but does not exist for one or more of the delivered elements in the arrangement (i.e. software solutions including project-related installation services). The Company allocates revenue to each undelivered element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold separately. Specifically, the Company determines the fair value of the software support and maintenance, hardware and sublicensed software support, remote hosting and subscriptions portions of the arrangement based on the renewal price for these services charged to clients; professional services (including training and consulting) portion of the arrangement, other than installation services, based on hourly rates which the Company charges for these services when sold apart from a software license; and, the hardware and sublicensed software, based on the prices for these elements when they are sold separately from the software. The residual amount of the fee after allocating revenue to the fair value of the undelivered elements is attributed to the software solution, including project-related installation services. If evidence of the fair value cannot be established for the undelivered elements of a license agreement, the entire amount of revenue under the arrangement is deferred until these elements have been delivered or objective evidence can be established.

The Company provides project-related installation services, which include project-scoping services, conducting pre-installation audits and creating initial environments. Because installation services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the software, the Company recognizes the software license and installation services fees over the software installation period using the percentage of completion method pursuant to Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting

for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, as prescribed by SOP 97-2. The Company measures the percentage of completion based on output measures which reflect direct labor hours incurred, beginning at software delivery and culminating at completion of installation. The installation services process length is dependent upon client specific factors and can occur in a short period of time or range up to one year in length.

The Company also provides implementation and consulting services, which include consulting activities that fall outside of the scope of the standard installation services. These services vary depending on the scope and complexity requested by the client. Examples of such services may include additional database consulting, system configuration, project management, testing assistance, network consulting, post conversion review and application management services. Implementation and consulting services generally are not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the software, and thus do not impact the timing of the software license recognition, unless software license fees are tied to implementation milestones. In those instances, the portion of the software license fee tied to implementation milestones is deferred until the related milestone is accomplished and related fees become billable and non-forfeitable. Implementation fees are recognized over the service period, which may extend from nine months to three years for multi-phased projects.

Remote hosting and managed services are marketed under long-term arrangements generally over periods of five to ten years. These services are typically provided to clients that have acquired a perpetual license for licensed software and have contracted with the Company to host the software in its data center. Under these arrangements, the client has the contractual right to take possession of the licensed software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty and it is feasible for the client to either run the software on its own equipment or contract with another party unrelated to the Company to host the software. Additionally, these services are not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the licensed software or other elements of the arrangement and as such, the Company accounts for these arrangements under SOP 97-2, as prescribed by EITF Issue No. 00-3, Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware. The hosting and managed services are recognized as the services are performed.

The Company also offers its solutions on an application service provider (“ASP”) or a term license basis, making available Company software functionality on a remote processing basis from the Company’s data centers. The data centers provide system and administrative support as well as processing services. Revenue on software and services provided on an ASP or term license basis is combined and recognized on a monthly basis over the term of the contract. The Company capitalizes related direct costs consisting of third-party costs and direct software installation and implementation costs associated with the initial set up of the client on the ASP service. These costs are amortized over the term of the arrangement.

Software support fees are marketed under annual and multi-year arrangements and are recognized as revenue ratably over the contracted support term. Hardware and sublicensed software maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the contracted maintenance term.

Subscription and content fees are generally marketed under annual and multi-year agreements and are recognized ratably over the contracted terms.

Hardware and sublicensed software sales are generally recognized when title passes to the client.

Where the Company has contractually agreed to develop new or customized software code for a client as a single element arrangement, the Company utilizes percentage of completion accounting in accordance with SOP 81-1.

When revenue is deferred all direct and incremental costs associated with the arrangement are capitalized and amortized over the contractual term once revenue recognition commences.

In the United Kingdom the Company has contracted with a third party to customize software and provide implementation and support services under a long term arrangement (nine years). Because the arrangement requires customization and development of software, and fair value for the support services does not exist in this arrangement, the entire arrangement is being accounted for as a single unit of accounting under SOP 81-1. Also, because the Company believes it is reasonably assured that no loss will be incurred under this arrangement, it is using the zero margin approach of applying percentage-of-completion accounting until the software customization and development services are completed. Once software customization and development services are completed, the remaining unrecognized portion of the fee will be recognized ratably over the remaining term of the arrangement. As of December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, approximately $69,000,000 and $14,181,000, respectively of revenue and expense has been recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Deferred revenue is comprised of deferrals for license fees, support, maintenance and other services for which payment has been received and for which the service has not yet been performed and revenue has not been recognized. Long-term deferred revenue at December 30, 2006, represents amounts received from license fees, maintenance and other services to be earned or provided beginning in periods on or after December 29, 2007.

The Company incurs out-of-pocket expenses in connection with its client service activities, primarily travel, which are reimbursed by its clients. The amounts of ”out-of-pocket” expenses and equal amounts of related reimbursements were $39,051,000, $33,387,000 and $32,081,000 for the years ended December 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, respectively.

The Company’s arrangements with clients typically include a deposit due upon contract signing and date-based licensed software payment terms and payments based upon delivery for services, hardware and sublicensed software. The Company has periodically provided long-term financing options to creditworthy clients through third party financing institutions and has directly provided extended payment terms to clients from contract date. These extended payment term arrangements typically provide for date based payments over periods ranging from 12 months up to five years. Pursuant to SOP 97-2, because a significant portion of the fee is due beyond one year, the Company has analyzed its history with these types of arrangements and has concluded that it does have a standard business practice of using extended payment term arrangements and have a long history of successfully collecting under the original payment terms for arrangements with similar clients, product offerings, and economics without granting concessions. Accordingly, the Company considers the fee to be fixed and determinable in these extended payment term arrangements and, thus, the timing of revenue is not impacted by the existence of extended payments. Some of these payment streams have been assigned on a non-recourse basis to third party financing institutions. The Company accounts for the assignment of these receivables as “true sales” as defined in FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Provided all revenue recognition criteria have been met, the Company recognizes revenue for these arrangements under its normal revenue recognition criteria, net of any payment discounts from financing transactions.

The terms of the Company’s software license agreements with its clients generally provide for a limited indemnification of such intellectual property against losses, expenses and liabilities arising from third-party claims based on alleged infringement by the Company’s solutions of an intellectual property right of such third party. The terms of such indemnification often limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations and generally include a right to replace or modify an infringing solution. To date, the Company has not had to reimburse any of its

clients for any losses related to these indemnification provisions pertaining to third-party intellectual property infringement claims. For several reasons, including the lack of prior indemnification claims and the lack of a monetary liability limit for certain infringement cases under the terms of the corresponding agreements with its clients, the Company cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification provisions.

(d)  Fiscal Year - The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. All references to years in these notes to consolidated financial statements represent fiscal years unless otherwise noted.

(e)  Software Development Costs - Costs incurred internally in creating computer software products are expensed until technological feasibility has been established upon completion of a detailed program design. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and expected future revenue for each product with minimum annual amortization equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated economic life of the product. The Company is amortizing capitalized costs over five years. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company capitalized $60,943,000, $62,039,000 and $62,523,000, respectively, of total software development costs of $262,163,000, $225,606,000 and $188,264,000, respectively. Amortization expense of capitalized software development costs in 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $45,750,000, $47,888,000 and $47,740,000, respectively, and accumulated amortization was $303,010,000, $255,122,000 and $207,382,000, respectively.

(f)  Cash Equivalents – Cash equivalents consist of short-term marketable securities with original maturities less than 90 days.

(g)  Short-term Investments – The Company’s short-term investments are primarily invested in auction rate securities which are debt and preferred stock instruments having longer-dated (in most cases, many years) legal maturities, but with interest rates that are generally reset every 28-49 days under an auction system. Because auction rate securities are frequently re-priced, they trade in the market on par-in, par-out basis. Because the Company regularly liquidates its investments in these securities for reasons including, among others, changes in market interest rates and changes in the availability of and the yield on alternative investments, the Company has classified these securities as available-for-sale securities. As available-for-sale securities, these investments are carried at fair value, which approximates cost. Despite the liquid nature of these investments, the Company categorizes them as short-term investments instead of cash and cash equivalents due to the underlying legal maturities of such securities. However, they have been classified as current assets as they are generally available to support the Company’s current operations. There have been no realized gains or losses on these investments.

(h)  Inventory - Inventory consists primarily of computer hardware and sub-licensed software held for resale and is recorded at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

(i)  Property and Equipment - Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over periods of two to 50 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using a straight-line method over the shorter of the lease terms or the useful lives, which range from periods of two to 15 years.

(j)  Earnings per Common Share – Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of

the Company. A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted per-share computations is as follows:

(In thousands, except per share data)