UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 29, 2007

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 0-15386

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As the United States enters the 2008 presidential election year, rising costs and varying quality have solidified healthcare as a tier-one issue. Presidential candidates in both parties favor using HIT to create efficiencies in the system and address the underlying issue of chronic illness. While there is bipartisan recognition of the benefits of HIT, we do not foresee a scenario in which the United States government would invest a significant amount of money directly in HIT, and we cannot predict how healthcare will be impacted by the upcoming election.

Increasing healthcare spending and challenges in the quality and efficiencies of care are not isolated to the United States. Most other countries are experiencing similar trends, a fact that creates a favorable environment internationally for HIT solutions and related services.

Reflective of these favorable national and global trends, the HIT market remains very competitive. The market could be impacted by factors such as changes in reimbursement rates to hospitals and physicians, a slowdown in adoption of HIT and changes in the political, economic and regulatory environment.

Cerner Vision

Cerner’s vision has evolved from a fundamental thought: Healthcare should revolve around the individual, not the encounter. This concept led to Cerner’s vision of a Community Health Model and the creation of the unified Cerner Millennium architecture, the Company’s person-centric, enterprise-wide architecture. The Community Health Model encompasses four steps:

Automate the Care Process

Cerner offers a longitudinal, person-centric electronic medical record, giving clinicians electronic access to the right information at the right time and place to achieve the optimal health outcome.

Connect the Person

Cerner is dedicated to building a personal health system. Medical information and care regimens accessible from home empower consumers to effectively manage their conditions and adhere to treatment plans, creating a new medium between physicians and individuals.

Structure the Knowledge

Cerner is dedicated to building systems that help bring the best science to every medical decision by structuring, storing and studying the content surrounding each care episode to achieve optimal clinical and financial outcomes.

Close the Loop

Incorporating a medical discovery into daily practice can take as long as 10 years. Cerner is dedicated to building systems that implement evidence-based medicine, reducing the average time from the discovery of an improved method to the change in the standard of care.

As more elements of this vision continue to evolve, Cerner expects medicine will become increasingly personalized and technology more accessible. As such, Cerner’s vision has evolved to include services that help large user communities:

	•		Connect all stakeholders in the healthcare system, including payers (employers, government), providers, and consumers
	•		Remove clinical, financial and administrative friction
	•		Create a secure, transparent, open network for data sharing to improve disease management and facilitate personalized medicine

Achieving this vision will require continued leverage of the Cerner Millennium architecture and ongoing expansion of our solutions and services, as discussed below under “Cerner Strategy and Execution.”

Cerner Strategy and Execution

Key elements of the Company’s business strategy include:

	•		Leverage the unified Cerner Millennium architecture and the depth and breadth of Cerner solutions to continue expanding market share
	•		Increase penetration of both large health systems and independent hospitals
	•		Cross-sell additional Cerner solutions and services to our existing client base

	•		Increase penetration of physician practices by offering a high-value suite of solutions with low up-front and recurring costs
	•		Continue to expand presence in non-U.S. markets
	•		Use our extensive clinical databases to help pharmaceutical companies monitor safety and speed drug approval
	•		Reduce friction in healthcare through more efficient payment for services and by creating innovative solutions for employers
	•		Connect healthcare devices

To execute upon many of the strategy elements listed above, we intend to continue developing innovative solutions and services that leverage the Company’s technology and human capital expertise and drive continued organic revenue growth, such as:

	•		Health e SM employer services, innovative solutions for employers, such as employer health plan third party administrator services and employer-based primary care clinics.
	•		Healthcare device innovation, including Cerner’s CareAware device connectivity platform and RxStation ™ medication dispensing devices.
	•		Millennium Lighthouse ® clinical process optimization, a consulting practice that interacts with clients to determine previously unidentified and unconnected relationships among healthcare processes and outcomes.
	•		Solutions and services that leverage the clinical data being captured in the digital healthcare environment, such as Health Facts ® , a data warehouse of more than 35 million clinical encounters that can be used to help draw meaningful relationships between pharmaceutical therapies and resulting clinical outcomes.
	•		PowerWorks ® physician practice solutions, a low-cost, high-value suite of remote-hosted offerings for physician practices’ clinical and revenue cycle needs.
	•		Our new PACS (Picture Archiving Communication System) Cerner ProVision ® workstation that strengthens our unified enterprise-wide imaging offering and reduces our reliance on third parties.

We also remain focused on offering more efficient and predictable implementations and systems that can be operated at lower costs to reduce total cost of ownership for our clients. We are accomplishing this through:

	•		Bedrock ® technology, which automates the implementation and management of the Cerner Millennium information platform.
	•		CernerWorks SM managed services, which allow Cerner to manage complexity and technology risks for clients through remote hosting while providing increased availability, system security and predictable, lower cost of operations.
	•		Our MethodM ® implementation approach, which is our best practice methodology for working with clients to deliver value through implementation of Cerner Millennium solutions.
	•		Our Lights On Network SM surveillance system that identifies system performance issues in real time and has the ability to predict issues that could create system vulnerability. In the future, we plan for the Lights On Network system to include real-time clinical and revenue cycle dashboards and ultimately create a real-time, evidence-based network.

In summary, our business strategy is to deliver the optimal client experience and to pursue and deliver continued innovation that will allow our important relationships with existing clients to continue growing while also creating opportunities to establish new client relationships.

Software Development

Cerner continues to build upon the success of the Cerner Millennium 2007 software release that became generally available in late 2006. Our client base has been rapidly adopting the release, and based on feedback from clients, Cerner decided to leverage the Cerner Millennium 2007 platform for all future innovations and enhancements through the end of the decade. Understanding the effort involved with major release upgrades and the impact on our clients, this strategy will allow clients already using Cerner Millennium 2007 to take advantage of new enhancements and functionality without requiring a major code upgrade.

We commit significant resources to developing new health information system solutions. As of December 29, 2007, approximately 2,600 associates were engaged in research and development activities. Total expenditures for the development and enhancement of our software solutions and RxStation medication dispensing devices were approximately $283,086,000, $262,163,000 and $225,606,000 during the 2007, 2006 and 2005 fiscal years, respectively. These figures include both capitalized and non-capitalized portions and exclude amounts amortized for financial reporting purposes.

As discussed above, continued investment in research and development remains a core element of Cerner’s strategy. This will include ongoing enhancement of our core solutions and development of new solutions and services.

The Company is committed to maintaining open attributes in its system architecture to achieve operability in a diverse set of technical and application environments. The Company strives to design its systems to co-exist with disparate applications developed and supported by other suppliers.

Sales and Marketing

The markets for Cerner HIT solutions, healthcare devices and services include integrated delivery networks, physician groups and networks, managed care organizations, hospitals, medical centers, free-standing reference laboratories, home health agencies, blood banks, imaging centers, pharmacies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, employers and public health organizations. To date, a substantial portion of system sales have been in clinical solutions in hospital-based provider organizations. The Cerner Millennium architecture is highly scalable. Organizations ranging from several-doctor physician practices, to community hospitals, to complex integrated delivery networks, to local, regional and national government agencies use our Cerner Millennium solutions.

We design all Cerner Millennium solutions to operate on HP or IBM platforms, allowing Cerner to be price competitive across the full size and organizational structure range of healthcare providers. The sale of a Cerner software health information system usually takes approximately nine to 18 months, from the time of initial contact to the signing of a contract.

Our executive marketing management is located in our North Kansas City, Missouri headquarters, while our client representatives are deployed across the United States and globally. In addition to the U.S., the Company, through subsidiaries and joint ventures, has sales associates and/or offices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, China (Hong Kong), India, Ireland, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain and the United Arab Emirates. Cerner’s consolidated revenues include non-U.S sales of $290,677,000, $207,367,000 and $113,317,000 for the 2007, 2006 and 2005 fiscal years, respectively.

The Company supports its sales force with technical personnel who perform demonstrations of Cerner solutions and services and assist clients in determining the proper hardware and software configurations. The Company’s primary direct marketing strategy is to generate sales contacts from its existing client base and through presentations at industry seminars and tradeshows. Cerner markets the PowerWorks solutions, offered on a subscription basis, directly to the physician practice market using telemarketing and through existing acute care clients that are looking to extend Cerner solutions to affiliated physicians. Cerner attends a number of major tradeshows each year and sponsors executive user conferences, which feature industry experts who address the HIT needs of large healthcare organizations.

Client Services

Substantially all of Cerner’s HIT software solutions clients enter into software maintenance agreements with us for support of their Cerner systems. In addition to immediate software support in the event of problems, these agreements allow clients the use of new releases of the Cerner solutions covered by maintenance agreements. Each client has 24-hour access to the client support team located at Cerner’s world headquarters in North Kansas City, Missouri and the Company’s global support organization in England.

Most Cerner clients who buy hardware through Cerner also enter into hardware maintenance agreements with Cerner. These arrangements normally provide for a fixed monthly fee for specified services. In the majority of cases, Cerner subcontracts hardware maintenance to the hardware manufacturer. Cerner also offers a set of managed services that include remote hosting, operational management services and disaster recovery.

Backlog

At December 29, 2007, Cerner had a contract backlog of approximately $2,712,195,000 as compared to approximately $2,194,460,000 at December 30, 2006. Such backlog represents system sales and services from signed contracts that have not yet been recognized as revenue. At December 29, 2007, the Company had approximately $129,604,000 of contracts receivable compared to $132,748,000 at the end of 2006, which represents revenues recognized but not yet billable under the terms of the contract. At December 29, 2007, Cerner had a software support and maintenance backlog of approximately $541,095,000 as compared to approximately $469,473,000 at December 30, 2006. Such backlog represents contracted software support and hardware maintenance services for a period of 12 months. The Company estimates that approximately 39 percent of the aggregate backlog at December 29, 2007 of $3,253,290,000 will be recognized as revenue during 2008.

Competition

The market for HIT solutions, devices and services is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to rapid technological change. Our principal existing competitors in the healthcare solutions and services market include: Computer Programs and Systems, Inc., Eclipsys Corporation, Epic Systems Corporation, GE Healthcare Technologies, iSoft Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Medical Information Technology, Inc. (“Meditech”), Misys Healthcare Systems and Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation, each of which offers a suite of software solutions that compete with many of our software solutions and services. Other competitors focus on only a portion of the market that Cerner addresses. For example, competitors such as Cap Gemini, Computer Sciences Corp., Deloitte & Touche, IBM Corporation and Perot Systems offer HIT services that compete directly with our consulting services. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc., athenahealth, Inc., eClinicalWorks, Inc., Emdeon Corporation and Quality Systems, Inc. offer solutions to the physician practice market but do not currently have a significant presence in the health systems and independent hospital market. We view our principal competitors in the healthcare device market to include: Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Omnicell, Inc. and Royal Philips Electronics; and we view our principal competitors in the healthcare transactions market to include: Accenture, Emdeon Corporation, McKesson Corporation, ProxyMed, Inc. and The TriZetto Group, Inc., with almost all of these competitors being substantially larger or having more experience and market share than us in their respective market. In addition, we expect that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and system integrators, start-up companies, managed care companies and others specializing in the healthcare industry may offer competitive software solutions, devices or services. The pace of change in the HIT market is rapid and there are frequent new software solution, device or service introductions, enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. We believe that the principal competitive factors in this market include the breadth and quality of solution and service offerings, the stability of the solution provider, the features and capabilities of the information systems and devices, the ongoing support for the systems and devices and the potential for enhancements and future compatible software solutions and devices.

Number of Employees (“Associates”)

As of December 29, 2007, the Company employed 7,873 associates worldwide.

Operating Segments

Information about the Company’s operating segments may be found in Note 12 to the financial statements.

Geographic Areas

Information about the Company’s geographic areas may be found in Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation below and in Note 12 to the financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Cerner Corporation

We may be subject to product-related liabilities. Many of our software solutions, healthcare devices or services (including life sciences/research services) provide data for use by healthcare providers in providing care to patients. No claims have been brought against us to date regarding injuries related to the use of our software solutions, healthcare devices or services (including life sciences/research services), but such claims may be made in the future. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage in an amount that we believe is sufficient for our business, there can be no assurance that such coverage will cover a particular claim that may be brought in the future, prove to be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful material claim brought against us, if uninsured or under-insured, could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may be subject to claims for system errors and warranties. Our software solutions and healthcare devices, particularly the Cerner Millennium versions, are very complex. As with complex software solutions and devices offered by others, our software solutions and healthcare devices may contain coding or other errors, especially when first introduced. Although we conduct extensive testing, we have discovered errors in our software solutions and healthcare devices after their introduction. Our software solutions and healthcare devices are intended for use in collecting and displaying clinical information used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Therefore, users of our software solutions and healthcare devices have a greater sensitivity to errors than the market for software products and devices generally. Our client agreements typically provide warranties concerning material errors and other matters. Failure of a client’s Cerner software solutions and/or healthcare devices to meet these warranties could constitute a material breach under the client agreement, allowing the client to terminate the agreement and possibly obtain a refund and/or damages, or might require us to incur additional expense in order to make the software solution or healthcare device meet these criteria. Our client agreements generally limit our liability arising from such claims but such limits may not be enforceable in certain jurisdictions or circumstances. A successful material claim brought against us, if uninsured or under-insured, could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may experience interruption at our data centers or client support facilities. We perform data center and/or hosting services for certain clients, including the storage of critical patient and administrative data. In addition, we provide support services to our clients through various client support facilities. We have invested in many reliability features such as multiple power feeds, multiple backup generators and redundant telecommunications lines, as well as technical and physical security safeguards, and structured our operations to substantially reduce the likelihood of disruptions. However, complete failure of all generators, impairment of all telecommunications lines, severe damage (environmental, accidental, intentional or pandemic) to the buildings, the equipment inside the buildings housing our data centers, the client data contained therein and/or the personnel trained to operate such facilities could cause a disruption in operations and negatively impact clients who depend on us for data center and system support services. Any interruption in operations at our data centers and/or client support facilities could damage our reputation, cause us to lose existing clients, hurt our ability to obtain new clients, result in revenue loss, create potential liabilites for our clients and us and increase insurance and other operating costs.

Our proprietary technology may be subject to claims for infringement or misappropriation of intellectual property rights of others, or may be infringed or misappropriated by others. We rely upon a combination of license agreements, confidentiality procedures, employee nondisclosure agreements, confidentiality agreements with third parties and technical measures to maintain the confidentiality and trade secrecy of our proprietary information. We also rely on trademark and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property rights in the United States and abroad. We have initiated a patent program but currently have a limited patent portfolio in the United States and abroad. Despite our protective measures and intellectual property rights, we may not be able to adequately protect against copying, reverse-engineering, misappropriation, infringement or unauthorized use or disclosure of our intellectual property.

In addition, we could be subject to intellectual property infringement or misappropriation claims as the number of competitors, patents and patent enforcement organizations in the HIT market increases, the functionality of our software solutions and services expands, and we enter new markets such as healthcare device innovation, healthcare transactions and life sciences. These claims, even if not

meritorious, could be expensive to defend. If we become liable to third parties for infringing or misappropriating their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial damage award, develop alternative technology, obtain a license and/or cease using, selling, licensing, implementing and supporting the solutions, devices and services that violate the intellectual property rights.

We are subject to risks associated with our non-U.S. operations. We market, sell and service our solutions, devices and services globally. We have established offices around the world, including in: the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia Pacific region. We will continue to expand our non-U.S. operations and enter new global markets. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources to develop successful direct and indirect non-U.S. sales and support channels. Our business is generally transacted in the local functional currency. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local partners. There is a risk that we may sometimes choose the wrong partner. For these reasons, we may not be able to maintain or increase non-U.S. market demand for our solutions, devices and services.

Non-U.S. operations are subject to inherent risks, and our future results could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors. These include, but are not limited to:

	•		Greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods
	•		Difficulties and costs of staffing and managing non-U.S. operations
	•		The impact of global economic conditions
	•		Unfavorable or changing foreign currency exchange rates
	•		Certification, licensing or regulatory requirements
	•		Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements
	•		Changes to or reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some countries
	•		Inability to obtain necessary financing on reasonable terms to adequately support non-U.S. operations and expansion
	•		Potentially adverse tax consequences
	•		Different or additional functionality requirements
	•		Trade protection measures
	•		Export control regulations
	•		Service provider and government spending patterns
	•		Natural disasters, war or terrorist acts
	•		Poor selection of a partner in a country
	•		Political conditions which may impact sales or threaten the safety of associates or our continued presence in these countries

Our failure to effectively hedge exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could unfavorably affect our performance. We utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Some of these instruments and contracts may involve elements of market and credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information about risk on financial instruments, see Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation under Market Risk. Further, our financial results from non-U.S. operations may decrease if we fail to execute or improperly hedge our exposure to currency fluctuations.

Our success depends upon the recruitment and retention of key personnel. To remain competitive in our industries, we must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled managerial, sales, marketing, consulting and technical personnel, including executives, consultants, programmers and systems architects skilled in the HIT, healthcare devices, healthcare transactions and life sciences industries and the technical environments in which our solutions, devices and services are needed. Competition for such personnel in our industries is intense in both the United States and abroad. Our failure to attract additional qualified personnel to meet our non-U.S. personnel needs could have a material adverse effect on our prospects for long-term growth. Our success is dependent to a significant degree on the continued contributions of key management, sales, marketing, consulting and technical personnel. The unexpected loss of key personnel could have a material adverse impact to our business and results of

operations, and could potentially inhibit development and delivery of our solutions, devices and services and market share advances.

We rely significantly on third party suppliers. We license or purchase intellectual property and technology (such as software, hardware and content) from third parties, including some competitors, and incorporate software, hardware, and/or content into or sell it in conjunction with our solutions, devices and services, some of which are critical to the operation and delivery of our solutions, devices and services. If any of the third party suppliers were to change product offerings, significantly increase prices or terminate our licenses or supply contracts, we might need to seek alternative suppliers and incur additional internal or external development costs to ensure continued performance of our solutions, devices and services. Such alternatives may not be available on attractive terms, or may not be as widely accepted or as effective as the intellectual property or technology provided by our existing suppliers. If the cost of licensing, purchasing or maintaining the third party intellectual property or technology significantly increases, our gross margin levels could significantly decrease. In addition, interruption in functionality of our solutions, devices and services as a result of changes in third party suppliers could adversely affect future sales of solutions, devices and services.

We intend to continue strategic business acquisitions which are subject to inherent risks. In order to expand our solutions, device offerings and services and grow our market and client base, we may continue to seek and complete strategic business acquisitions that we believe are complementary to our business. Acquisitions have inherent risks which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or prospects, including, but not limited to: 1) failure to successfully integrate the business and financial operations, services, intellectual property, solutions or personnel of the acquired business; 2) diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; 3) entry into markets in which we have little or no direct prior experience; 4) failure to achieve projected synergies and performance targets; 5) loss of clients or key personnel of the acquired business; 6) incurrence of debt and/or assumption of known and unknown liabilities; 7) write-off of software development costs, goodwill, client lists and amortization of expenses related to intangible assets; 8) dilutive issuances of equity securities; and, 9) accounting deficiencies that could arise in connection with, or as a result of, the acquisition of the acquired company, including issues related to internal control over financial reporting and the time and cost associated with remedying such deficiencies. If we fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses or fail to implement our business strategies with respect to these acquisitions, we may not be able to achieve projected results or support the amount of consideration paid for such acquired businesses.

Risks Related to the Healthcare Information Technology, Healthcare Device and Healthcare Transaction Industry

The healthcare industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) continues to have a direct impact on the healthcare industry by requiring identifiers and standardized transactions/code sets and necessary security and privacy measures in order to ensure the appropriate level of privacy of protected health information. These regulatory factors affect the purchasing practices and operation of healthcare organizations. Federal and state legislatures have periodically considered programs to reform or amend the U.S. healthcare system at both the federal and state level and to change healthcare financing and reimbursement systems. These programs may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in healthcare, lower reimbursement rates or otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate. Healthcare industry participants may respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in our solutions and services.

Many healthcare providers are consolidating to create integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power. These providers may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for our solutions and services. As the healthcare industry consolidates, our client base could be eroded, competition for clients could become more intense and the importance of landing new client relationships becomes greater.

The healthcare industry is highly regulated at the local, state and federal level. We are subject to a significant and wide-ranging number of regulations both within the U.S. and elsewhere, such as, without

limitation, regulations in the areas of: healthcare fraud, e-prescribing, claims processing and transmission, medical devices, the security and privacy of patient data and interoperability standards.

Healthcare Fraud. Federal and state governments continue to strengthen their positions and scrutiny over practices involving healthcare fraud affecting healthcare providers whose services are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other government healthcare programs. Our healthcare provider clients are subject to laws and regulations on fraud and abuse which, among other things, prohibit the direct or indirect payment or receipt of any remuneration for patient referrals, or arranging for or recommending referrals or other business paid for in whole or in part by these federal or state healthcare programs. Federal enforcement personnel have substantial funding, powers and remedies to pursue suspected or perceived fraud and abuse. The effect of this government regulation on our clients is difficult to predict. While we believe that we are in substantial compliance with any applicable laws, many of the regulations applicable to our clients and that may be applicable to us, are vague or indefinite and have not been interpreted by the courts. They may be interpreted or applied by a prosecutorial, regulatory or judicial authority in a manner that could broaden their applicability to us or require our clients to make changes in their operations or the way in which they deal with us. If such laws and regulations are determined to be applicable to us and if we fail to comply with any applicable laws and regulations, we could be subject to sanctions or liability, including exclusion from government health programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

E-Prescribing. The use of our solutions by physicians for electronic prescribing, electronic routing of prescriptions to pharmacies and dispensing is governed by state and federal law. States have differing prescription format requirements, which we have programmed into our software. In addition, in November 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services announced regulations by CMS related to “E-Prescribing and the Prescription Drug Program” (“E-Prescribing Regulations”). These E-Prescribing Regulations were mandated by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. The E-Prescribing Regulations set forth standards for the transmission of electronic prescriptions. The final regulations adopted two standards effective January 2006. A second and final set of required standards are to be published no later than April 1, 2008 and implemented no later than April 1, 2009. These standards are detailed and significant, and cover not only transactions between prescribers and dispensers for prescriptions but also electronic eligibility and benefits inquiries and drug formulary and benefit coverage information. Our efforts to provide solutions that enable our clients to comply with these regulations could be time-consuming and expensive.

Claims Transmissions. Certain of our solutions assist our clients in submitting claims to payers, which claims are governed by federal and state laws. Our solutions are capable of electronically transmitting claims for services and items rendered by a physician to many patients’ payers for approval and reimbursement. Federal law provides civil liability to any person that knowingly submits a claim to a payer, including, for example, Medicare, Medicaid and private health plans, seeking payment for any services or items that have not been provided to the patient. Federal law may also impose criminal penalties for intentionally submitting such false claims. We have policies and procedures in place that we believe result in the accurate and complete transmission of claims, provided that the information given to us by our clients is also accurate and complete. The HIPAA security, privacy and transaction standards, as discussed below, also have a potentially significant effect on our claims transmission services, since those services must be structured and provided in a way that supports our clients’ HIPAA compliance obligations.

Regulation of Medical Devices. The United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) has declared that certain of our solutions are medical devices that are actively regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“Act”) and amendments to the Act. As a consequence, we are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA with regard to those solutions that are actively regulated. Other countries have similar regulations in place related to medical devices, that now or may in the future apply to certain of our solutions. If other of our solutions are deemed to be actively regulated medical devices by the FDA or similar regulatory agencies in countries where we do business, we could be subject to extensive requirements governing pre- and post-marketing requirements including pre-market notification clearance. Complying with these medical device regulations on a global perspective is time consuming and expensive. Further, it is possible that these regulatory agencies may become more active in regulating software that is used in healthcare.

There have been nine FDA inspections since 1998 at various Cerner sites. Inspections conducted at our world headquarters in 1999 and our prior Houston, Texas facility in 2002 each resulted in the issuance of an FDA Form 483 that we responded to promptly. The FDA has taken no further action with respect to either of the Form 483s that were issued in 1999 and 2002. The remaining seven FDA inspections, including inspections at our world headquarters in 2006 and 2007, resulted in no issuance of a Form 483. We remain subject to periodic FDA inspections and we could be required to undertake additional actions to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements. Our failure to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to manufacture and distribute our solutions. The FDA has many enforcement tools including recalls, seizures, injunctions, civil fines and/or criminal prosecutions. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Security and Privacy of Patient Information. State and federal laws regulate the confidentiality of patient records and the circumstances under which those records may be released. These regulations govern both the disclosure and use of confidential patient medical record information and require the users of such information to implement specified security measures. Regulations currently in place governing electronic health data transmissions continue to evolve and are often unclear and difficult to apply.

HIPAA regulations require national standards for some types of electronic health information transactions and the data elements used in those transactions, security standards to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of health information and standards to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. Covered entities under HIPAA, which include healthcare organizations such as our clients, were required to comply with the privacy standards by April 2003, the transaction regulations by October 2003 and the security regulations by April 2005. As a business associate of the covered entities, we, in most instances, must also ensure compliance with the HIPAA regulations as it pertains to our clients.

We are unable to predict what interpretations of or changes to the regulations issued pursuant to HIPAA, might be issued or made in the future or how those interpretations or changes could affect our business or the costs of compliance with HIPAA. Evolving HIPAA-related laws or regulations could restrict the ability of our clients to obtain, use or disseminate patient information. This could adversely affect demand for our solutions if they are not re-designed in a timely manner in order to meet the requirements of any new interpretations or regulations that seek to protect the privacy and security of patient data or enable our clients to execute new or modified healthcare transactions. We may need to expend additional capital, software development and other resources to modify our solutions and devices to address these evolving data security and privacy issues.

Interoperability Standards . Our clients are concerned with and often require that our software solutions and healthcare devices be interoperable with other third party HIT suppliers. Market forces or governmental/regulatory authorities could create software interoperability standards that would apply to our solutions, and if our software solutions and/or healthcare devices are not consistent with those standards, we could be forced to incur substantial additional development costs to conform. Currently, the Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT) is developing a comprehensive set of criteria for the functionality, interoperability and security of various software modules in the HIT industry. Achieving CCHIT certification is becoming a competitive requirement, resulting in increased software development and administrative expense to conform to these requirements. If our software solutions and healthcare devices are not consistent with emerging standards, our market position and sales could be impaired and we may have to invest significantly in changes to our software solutions and healthcare devices.

We operate in intensely competitive and dynamic industries, and our ability to successfully compete and continue to grow our business depends on our ability to respond quickly to market changes and changing technologies and to bring competitive new solutions, devices, features and services to market in a timely fashion. The market for healthcare information systems, healthcare devices, healthcare transactions and life sciences consulting services are intensely competitive, dynamically evolving and subject to rapid technological and innovative changes. Development of new proprietary technology or services is complex, entails significant time and expense and may not be

successful. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to introduce new solutions, devices or services on schedule, or at all, nor can we guarantee that, despite extensive testing, errors will not be found in our new solution releases, devices or services before or after commercial release, which could result in solution, device or service delivery redevelopment costs and loss of, or delay in, market acceptance.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in the healthcare information market include: the breadth and quality of system and software solution offerings, the stability of the solution provider, the features and capabilities of the information systems and devices, the ongoing support for the systems and devices and the potential for enhancements and future compatible software solutions and devices. Certain of our competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than us and some of our competitors offer software solutions that we do not offer. Our principal existing competitors are set forth above Part 1, Item 1 Competition.

In addition, we expect that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and system integrators, start-up companies and others specializing in the healthcare industry may offer competitive software solutions, devices or services. We face strong competitors and often face downward price pressure. Additionally, the pace of change in the healthcare information systems market is rapid and there are frequent new software solution introductions, software solution enhancements, device introductions, device enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, our success will depend upon our ability to: maintain a competitive pricing model, keep pace with technological change and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new and enhanced software solutions, devices and services that satisfy changing client requirements and achieve market acceptance. There are a limited number of hospitals and other healthcare providers in the U.S. HIT market. As costs fall, technology improves, and market factors continue to compel investment by healthcare organizations in solutions and services like ours, market saturation in the U.S. may change the competitive landscape in favor of larger, more diversified competitors with greater scale.

Risks Related to Our Stock

Our quarterly operating results may vary which could adversely affect our stock price. Our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in future periods, including, variations from guidance, expectations or historical results or trends. Quarterly operating results may vary for a number of reasons including accounting policy changes, demand for our solutions, devices and services, the financial condition of our clients and potential clients, our long sales cycle, potentially long installation and implementation cycles for larger, more complex and higher-priced systems and other factors described in this section and elsewhere in this report. As a result of healthcare industry trends and the market for our Cerner Millennium solutions, a large percentage of our revenues are generated by the sale and installation of larger, more complex and higher-priced systems. The sales process for these systems is lengthy and involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources by the client. Sales may be subject to delays due to changes in clients’ internal budgets, procedures for approving large capital expenditures, competing needs for other capital expenditures, availability of personnel resources and by actions taken by competitors. Delays in the expected sale, installation or implementation of these large systems may have a significant impact on our anticipated quarterly revenues and consequently our earnings, since a significant percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed.

We recognize software revenue upon the completion of standard milestone conditions and the amount of revenue recognized in any quarter depends upon our and our clients’ abilities to meet project milestones. Delays in meeting these milestone conditions or modification of the contract could result in a shift of revenue recognition from one quarter to another and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for a particular quarter.

Our revenues from system sales historically have been lower in the first quarter of the year and greater in the fourth quarter of the year, primarily as a result of clients’ year-end efforts to make all final capital expenditures for the then-current year.

Our sales forecasts may vary from actual sales in a particular quarter. We use a “pipeline” system, a common industry practice, to forecast sales and trends in our business. Our sales associates monitor

the status of all sales opportunities, such as the date when they estimate that a client will make a purchase decision and the potential dollar amount of the sale. These estimates are aggregated periodically to generate a sales pipeline. We compare this pipeline at various points in time to evaluate trends in our business. This analysis provides guidance in business planning and forecasting, but these pipeline estimates are by their nature speculative. Our pipeline estimates are not necessarily reliable predictors of revenues in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time, partially because of changes in the pipeline and in conversion rates of the pipeline into contracts that can be very difficult to estimate. A negative variation in the expected conversion rate or timing of the pipeline into contracts, or in the pipeline itself, could cause our plan or forecast to be inaccurate and thereby adversely affect business results. For example, a slowdown in information technology spending, adverse economic conditions or a variety of other factors can cause purchasing decisions to be delayed, reduced in amount or cancelled, which would reduce the overall pipeline conversion rate in a particular period of time. Because a substantial portion of our contracts are completed in the latter part of a quarter, we may not be able to adjust our cost structure quickly enough in response to a revenue shortfall resulting from a decrease in our pipeline conversion rate in any given fiscal quarter(s).

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile. The market for our common stock may experience significant price and volume fluctuations in response to a number of factors including actual or anticipated variations in operating results, rumors about our performance or solutions, devices and services, changes in expectations of future financial performance or estimates of securities analysts, governmental regulatory action, healthcare reform measures, client relationship developments, changes occurring in the securities markets in general and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. As a matter of policy, we do not generally comment on our stock price or rumors.

Furthermore, the stock market in general, and the markets for software, healthcare and information technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, regardless of actual operating performance.

Our Directors have authority to issue preferred stock and our corporate governance documents contain anti-takeover provisions. Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the preferences, rights and privileges of those shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of common stock may be harmed by rights granted to the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future.

In addition, some provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could make it more difficult for a potential acquirer to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions that: provide for a classified board of directors, prohibit shareholders from taking action by written consent and restrict the ability of shareholders to call special meetings. We are also subject to provisions of Delaware law that prohibit us from engaging in any business combination with any interested shareholder for a period of three years from the date the person became an interested shareholder, unless certain conditions are met, which could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control.

Factors that May Affect Future Results of Operations, Financial Condition or Business
Statements made in this report, the Annual Report to Shareholders of which this report is made a part, other reports and proxy statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, communications to shareholders, press releases and oral statements made by representatives of the Company that are not historical in nature, or that state the Company’s or management’s intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions of the future, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “could,” “should,” “will,” “intended,” “continue,” “believe,” “may,” “expect,” “hope,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “plan,” “guidance” or “estimate” or the negative of these words, variations thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. It is important to note that any such performance and actual results, financial condition or business, could differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,

those discussed in this Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere herein or in other reports filed with the SEC. Other unforeseen factors not identified herein could also have such an effect. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in future operating results, financial condition or business over time.

Item 2. Properties

World Headquarters

Our world headquarters offices are located in a Company-owned office park in North Kansas City, Missouri, containing approximately 992,877 gross square feet of useable space (the “Campus”), inclusive of the new data center and clinic buildings described below. As of December 29, 2007, we were using all of the useable space for our U.S. corporate headquarters operations.

In June 2007, the Company completed construction of the world headquarters Technology Center, a 135,161 square foot data center facility on the Campus. We deliver remote hosting, disaster recovery and other services to our clients from this facility.

In February 2006, we completed construction on the Campus of a 13,136 square foot addition to the 2901 Rockcreek Parkway building to house Health e Clinic, a wholly-owned subsidiary, which provides primary care medical services for our associates and their family members.

In 2004, we purchased approximately 12 acres of unimproved real estate adjacent to the Campus for campus expansion. This land was purchased to provide a secondary entry into the Campus and to provide for future building development as needed. The first phase of development was a roadway extension and second entry point into the Campus. The second phase of development is the data center facility described above. Future development of this land is undetermined at this time.

Other Properties

In February 2007, we entered into a long-term lease for 480,700 gross square feet of property located in Kansas City, Missouri. This office space, known as the Innovation Campus, houses associates from our intellectual property organizations. In April and August 2007, additional space was added to this lease so that the Innovation Campus now consists of 828,740 square feet, including the daycare facility listed below.

In July 2007, we entered into a lease for 36,800 gross square feet of property located in Kansas City, MO, near the Innovation Campus, which is the home for our Innovation Kids Learning Center, providing on-site daycare for Cerner associate families.

In June 2005, we purchased 263,512 gross square feet of property located in Kansas City, Missouri. The office space, known as the Cerner Oaks Campus, houses associates from the CernerWorks group and associates of Cerner’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Health e Exchange.

We also own property located along the north riverbank of the Missouri River, approximately two miles from the Campus. This property consists of a 96,318 gross square foot building and a 1,300-car parking garage. The building has been renovated for use as a corporate training, meeting and event center for the Company and third parties. We have also made use of the parking garage to meet overflow-parking demands on the Campus.

In February 2007, we acquired a lease for an additional office in Garden Grove, California, as part of the Etreby Computer Company, Inc. acquisition.

As of the end of February 2008, the Company leased office space in: Birmingham, Alabama; Beverly Hills and Garden Grove, California; Denver, Colorado; Overland Park, Kansas; Waltham, Massachusetts; Bel Air, Maryland; Minneapolis and Rochester, Minnesota; Kansas City, Missouri; Charlotte, North Carolina; Beaverton, Oregon; Blue Bell, Pennsylvania; and Vienna, Virginia. The Company operates one of its data centers in leased space in Lee’s Summit, Missouri. Globally, the Company also leases office space in: Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, Australia; Brussels, Belgium; London-Ontario, Canada; Hong Kong, China; Paris, France; Herzogenrath and Idstein, Germany; Bangalore, India; Dublin, Ireland; Kuala

Lumpur, Malaysia; Ngee Ann City, Singapore; Barcelona and Madrid, Spain; London and Slough, England; and, Abu Dhabi and Dubai Internet City, United Arab Emirates.

In 2007, our Overland Park, Kansas office housing associates with our Cerner BeyondNow, Inc. subsidiary was closed as we relocated many associates to the Innovation Campus and/or the necessary business functions to other Company offices, and we entered into a new agreement for office space in Overland Park, Kansas for operations related to Cerner’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Cerner Innovation, Inc.

Also in 2007, our Sterling, Virginia office was closed as we relocated many associates and/or the necessary business functions to other Company offices.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We have no material pending litigation.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders of the Company during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.

	•		becoming more efficient at implementing our software by leveraging implementation support services and methodologies we have developed that can reduce the amount of effort required to implement our software;
	•		leveraging our investments in R&D by addressing new markets (i.e., non-U.S.) that do not require significant incremental R&D but can contribute significantly to revenue growth; and,
	•		leveraging our scalable business infrastructure to reduce the rate of increase in general and administrative spending to below our revenue growth rate.

We are also focused on increasing cash flow by growing earnings, reducing the use of working capital and controlling capital expenditures. While 2007 was a year of heavy capital investment because of investments in a new data center to support our rapidly growing hosting business and purchasing new buildings to accommodate growth in our associate base, we expect capital spending to decrease in 2008.

Results Overview

In 2007, we continued to execute on our core strategies to drive revenue growth, expand operating margins, grow earnings and generate good cash flow. The 2007 results included strong levels of bookings, earnings and cash flow. New business bookings revenue in 2007, which reflects the value of executed contracts for software, hardware, services and managed services (hosting of software in the Company’s data center) was $1.51 billion, which is an increase of 14% when compared to $1.32 billion in 2006. The 2007 and 2006 bookings exclude bookings related to the Company’s participation in the National Health Services (NHS) initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical records in England in the amount of $97.8 million and $154.2 million, respectively. Revenues for 2007 increased 10% to $1.52 billion compared to $1.38 billion in 2006, driven primarily by an increase in support, maintenance and services revenues.

The 2007 net earnings increased 16% to $127.1 million compared to $109.9 million in 2006. Diluted earnings per share increased 14% to $1.53 compared to $1.34 in 2006. The 2007 and 2006 net earnings and diluted earnings per share reflect the impact of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the expensing of stock options. The effect of accounting under SFAS 123R reduced the 2007 net earnings and diluted earnings per share by $10.2 million and $0.12, and the 2006 earnings and diluted earnings per share by $11.7 million and $0.14, respectively. The growth in net earnings and diluted earnings per share was driven primarily by continued progress with the Company’s margin expansion initiatives, particularly improving professional services margins and leveraging R&D investments. Our 2007 operating margin was 13%, and we remain on target with our desire to achieve our long term goal of 20% operating margins.

We had cash collections of receivables of $1.65 billion in 2007 compared to $1.46 billion in 2006, with the increase driven by increased billings. Days sales outstanding increased to 90 days for the quarter ended December 29, 2007 compared to 87 days for the quarter ended December 30, 2006. This increase was driven by an increase in billed receivables as opposed to unbilled items. Operating cash flows for 2007 were $274.6 million compared to $232.7 million in 2006.

This year also included progress on our strategic initiatives that, while not yet material to our current results, are an important part of our longer-term growth strategy.

In 2007, we made progress in selling and implementing our CareAware healthcare device connectivity platform that allows medical devices to be connected to an electronic medical record through a USB-like connection. During 2007, more than 20 clients purchased this solution, with several going live during the year. Initial sales have been to our existing clients, but our CareAware architecture gives us the ability to market outside of our installed base, which we expect to do in the future. In 2008, we also expect to continue expanding the number of devices supported by the CareAware architecture, which will increase our market opportunity.

We also delivered our first production CareAware RxStation medication dispensing devices in 2007. RxStation medication dispensing devices and solutions automate the medication process so both nursing and pharmacy can provide safer care and better management of the medication dispensing and

administration process. In 2008, we expect to leverage our success with early adopter clients and increase marketing of the RxStation devices, with initial efforts focused inside our installed base.

In 2007, we also continued to make progress across our employer-focused initiatives that we call Health e employer services, which are targeted at employers looking to reduce health plan administrative costs and improve the health of their employees. In 2007, Cerner’s Health e Exchange became the third party administrator (TPA) for three employers representing more than 10,000 covered lives. Our TPA approach aims to help employers reduce healthcare friction, such as delays in billing statements and provider payments, resulting in lower costs. And our Health e Clinic was selected by a Fortune 500 technology company to provide a fully-automated employer-based clinic, modeled after our successful on-site clinic that has helped improve productivity of our workforce and provided cost savings to our health plan and the participants in the health plan.

Healthcare Information Technology Market Outlook

We have provided a detailed assessment of the healthcare information technology market Part 1, Item 1 The Healthcare and Healthcare IT Industry.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 29, 2007, Compared to Year Ended December 30, 2006

The Company’s net earnings increased 16% to $127,125,000 in 2007 from $109,891,000 in 2006. The effects of SFAS No. 123R, which requires the expensing of stock options, decreased net earnings in 2007 and 2006 by $10,159,000, net of $6,030,000 tax benefit and $11,746,000, net of $7,275,000 tax benefit, respectively.

Revenues increased 10% to $1,519,877,000 in 2007, compared with $1,378,038,000 in 2006. The revenue composition for 2007 was $500,319,000 in system sales, $397,713,000 in support and maintenance, $585,067,000 in services and $36,778,000 in reimbursed travel.

	•		System sales revenues decreased 1% to $500,319,000 in 2007 from $505,743,000 in 2006. Included in system sales are revenues from the sale of software, hardware, sublicensed software, deployment period licensed software upgrade rights, installation fees, transaction processing and subscriptions. The slight decrease in system sales was primarily attributable to a decrease in software revenue, which was largely offset by an increase in hardware, sublicensed software, and subscriptions revenue. We believe the decline in software revenue was primarily caused by much of our client base being focused on upgrading to the Cerner Millennium 2007 release. Cerner generally sells a perpetual license, so our clients do not have to pay new license fees when they upgrade to a new version of our software, so the focus by much of our base on implementing the upgrade impacted our software sales. We believe this upgrade cycle will have a smaller impact going forward, and we expect software revenue to grow in 2008.
	•		Support, maintenance and services revenues increased 18% to $982,780,000 in 2007 from $833,244,000 in 2006. Included in support, maintenance and services revenues are support and maintenance of software and hardware, professional services excluding installation, and managed services. A summary of the Company’s support, maintenance and services revenues in 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

		The $92,239,000, or 19%, increase in services revenue was attributable to growth in CernerWorks managed services and increased professional services utilization rates. The $57,297,000, or 17%, increase in support and maintenance revenues is attributable to continued success at selling Cerner Millennium applications, implementing them at client sites, and initiating billing for support and maintenance fees.
•		Contract backlog, which reflects new business bookings that have not yet been recognized as revenue, increased 24% in 2007 compared to 2006. This increase was driven by growth in new business bookings during the past four quarters, including continued strong levels of managed services bookings that typically have longer contract terms. A summary of the Company’s total backlog for 2007 and 2006 follows:

The cost of revenues was 18% of total revenues in 2007 and 21% in 2006. The cost of revenues includes the cost of reimbursed travel expense, sales commissions, third party consulting services and subscription content, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from hardware and software manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, maintenance, support, services and reimbursed travel) carrying different margin rates changes from period to period. The decline in cost of revenues as a percent of revenue is primarily associated with lower commissions and third party costs on licensed software sales and a higher mix of support, maintenance and services revenues, which have a lower cost of revenue.

Total operating expenses, excluding cost of revenues, increased 12% to $1,035,684,000 in 2007 from $920,901,000 in 2006. Accounting pursuant to SFAS 123(R), which results in the expensing of share-based compensation, impacted expenses in 2007 and 2006 as indicated below:

	•		Sales and client service expenses as a percent of total revenues were 43% and 42% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. These expenses increased 14% to $657,956,000 in 2007, from $578,050,000 in 2006. Sales and client service expenses include salaries of sales and client service personnel, communications expenses, unreimbursed travel expenses, expense for share-based payments, sales and marketing salaries and trade show and advertising costs. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in CernerWorks managed services business.
	•		Total expense for software development in 2007 increased 10% to $270,576,000, from $246,970,000 in 2006. The increase in aggregate expenditures for software development in 2007 was due to continued development and enhancement of the Cerner Millennium platform and software solutions and investments in new initiatives, such as RxStation medication dispensing devices. Included in 2007 software development expense is $8.6 million of research and development activities for the RxStation medical dispensing device. $3.4 million of this amount recorded in 2007 is related to periods prior to 2007. A summary of the Company’s total software development expense in 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

•

General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues were 7% in 2007 and 2006. These expenses increased 12% to $107,152,000 in 2007 from $95,881,000 in 2006. This increase was due primarily to the growth of the Company’s core business and increased presence in the global market. General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staff, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees, the transaction gains or losses on foreign currency and expense for share-based payments. The Company recorded a net transaction gain on foreign currency of $3,691,000 and $3,764,000 in 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Net interest income was $1,269,000 in 2007, compared with net interest expense of $697,000 in 2006. Interest income increased to $13,206,000 in 2007 from $11,877,000 in 2006, due primarily to higher yields on cash and short term investments. Interest expense decreased to $11,937,000 in 2007 from $12,574,000 in 2006, due primarily to a reduction in long-term debt.

Other expense was $1,385,000 in 2007, compared to other income of $2,074,000 in 2006. Included in 2006 other income is a gain recorded in the first quarter of 2006 related to the renegotiation of a supplier contract that eliminated a liability related to unfavorable future commitments due to that supplier. The Company was able to renegotiate the contract to eliminate certain minimum volume requirements and reduce pricing to market rates leading to the elimination of the previously recorded liability.

The Company’s effective tax rate was 38% and 34% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The change in tax rate was principally related to the creation of a valuation allowance in a non-U.S. jurisdiction in 2007.

During the second quarter of 2007, the Company determined that due to a change in circumstances in the quarter, it is more likely than not that certain tax operating loss carry-forwards in a non-U.S. jurisdiction would not be realized resulting in the recognition of a valuation allowance totaling approximately $7,982,000.

Tax expense for 2007 and 2006 includes benefits of approximately $3,125,000 and $1,994,000, respectively for adjustments relating to prior periods.

Operations by Segment

The Company has two operating segments, Domestic and Global.

The following table presents a summary of the operating information for the years ended 2007 and
2006:

Domestic Segment

The Company’s Domestic segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures associated with business activity in the United States.

Operating earnings increased 11% to $675,156,000 in 2007 from $607,003,000 in 2006.

	•		Revenues increased 5% to $1,227,434,000 in 2007 from $1,166,662,000 in 2006. This increase was primarily driven by growth in managed services and support and maintenance.
	•		Cost of revenues was 18% and 22% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decline was driven primarily by lower commissions and third party costs on licensed software sales, lower hardware sales, and a higher mix of support, maintenance and services revenues, which have a lower cost of revenue.
	•		Operating expenses increased 7% for the year ended December 29, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 30, 2006, due primarily to growth in managed services.

Global Segment

The Company’s global segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures linked to business activity in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cayman Islands, China (Hong Kong), Egypt, England, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Malaysia, Puerto Rico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain Sweden, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates.

Operating earnings increased 42% to $85,955,000 in 2007 from $60,572,000 in 2006.

•

Revenues increased 40% to $290,677,000 in 2007 from $207,367,000 in 2006. Approximately one third of this increase was driven by an increase in revenue from the Company’s participation in the National Health Service (NHS) initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical

			records in England. The increase in global revenue was also driven by growth in several other countries, including Malaysia, Australia, Egypt, France, Spain, and the United Arab Emirates. Revenue related to the NHS initiative that is being accounted for at zero margin totaled $96,000,000 and $71,000,000 for the 2007 and 2006 fiscal years, respectively. These revenues did not affect operating earnings as the Company is accounting for them at zero-margin using a zero-margin approach of applying percentage-of-completion accounting until either the software customization and development services are completed or the Company is able to determine fair value for the support services. The Company expects to recognize margin on the arrangements by 2009. The remaining unrecognized portion of the fee will be recognized over the remaining term of the arrangement, which expires in 2014.
	•		Cost of revenues was 18% and 19% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The lower cost of revenues was driven by a slightly higher mix of support, maintenance and services revenues, which have a lower cost of revenue.
	•		Operating expenses for the year ended December 29, 2007 increased 41%, compared to the year ended December 30, 2006, primarily due to hiring personnel for the projects in England and supporting growth in other global regions.

Other Segment

The Company’s Other segment includes revenues and expenses which are not tracked by geographic segment. Operating losses increased 11% to $557,028,000 in 2007 from $501,408,000 in 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase in operating expenses such as software development, marketing, general and administrative, share-based compensation expense and depreciation.

Year Ended December 30, 2006, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005

The Company’s net earnings increased 27% to $109,891,000 in 2006 compared to $86,251,000 in 2005. Net earnings for 2006 include adjustments for approximately $1,994,000 of tax benefit for items relating to prior periods. 2006 net earnings also reflect the impact of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the expensing of stock options. The effect of accounting under SFAS 123R reduced the 2006 net earnings by $11,746,000 (net of taxes). Net earnings for 2005 included an adjustment in the third quarter of 2005 related to a prior period for a tax benefit from the carry-back of a capital loss generated by the sale of Zynx of $4,794,000 and the write-off of acquired in-process research and development in the first quarter of 2005 of $3,941,000, net of a $2,441,000 tax benefit.

Revenues increased 19% to $1,378,038,000 in 2006 from $1,160,785,000 in 2005. The revenue composition for 2006 was $505,743,000 in system sales, $340,416,000 in support and maintenance, $492,828,000 in services and $39,051,000 in reimbursed travel.

	•		System sales increased 12% to $505,743,000 in 2006 from $449,734,000 in 2005. Included in system sales are revenues from the sale of software, hardware, sublicensed software, deployment period licensed software upgrade rights, installation fees, transaction processing and subscriptions. System sales growth in 2006 was driven by strong growth of software, hardware and subscriptions.
	•		Support, maintenance and service revenues increased 23% to $833,244,000 in 2006 from $677,664,000 in 2005. Included in support, maintenance and services revenues are support and maintenance of software and hardware, professional services excluding installation, and managed services. A summary of the Company’s support, maintenance and services revenues in 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

			The $111,880,000, or 29%, increase in services revenues was attributable to growth in professional services and CernerWorks managed services. The $43,700,000, or 15%, increase in support and maintenance revenues is attributable to continued success at selling Cerner Millennium applications, implementing them at client sites, and initiating billing for support and maintenance fees.
	•		Contract backlog, which reflects new business bookings that have not yet been recognized as revenue, increased 27% in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase is due to a strong increase in new business bookings in 2006 compared to 2005. A summary of the Company’s 2006 and 2005 total backlog follows:

The cost of revenues was 21% of total revenues in 2006 and 22% of total revenues in 2005. The cost of revenues includes the cost of reimbursed travel expense, sales commissions, third party consulting services and subscription content, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from hardware and software manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, maintenance, support, services and reimbursed travel) carrying different margin rates changes from period to period. The decrease in the cost of revenue as a percent of total revenues resulted principally from strong levels of software sales and strong growth in services that do not have a high level of associated third party costs.

Total operating expenses, excluding cost of revenues, increased 20% to $920,901,000 in 2006 from $765,663,000 in 2005. Accounting pursuant to SFAS 123(R), which results in the expensing of share-based compensation, impacted expenses as indicated below:

•

Sales and client service expenses as a percent of total revenues were 42% and 40% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in total sales and client service expenses to $578,050,000 in 2006 from $466,206,000 in 2005 was primarily due to an increase in personnel expenses associated with the strong growth in our professional services and managed services businesses and an increased presence in the global market. Sales and client service expenses include salaries of sales and client service personnel, communications expenses, unreimbursed travel expenses, expense for share-based payments, sales and marketing salaries and trade show and advertising costs.

•

Total expense for software development in 2006 increased 17% to $246,970,000, from $211,455,000 in 2005. The increase in aggregate expenditures for software development in 2006 was due to continued development and enhancement of the Cerner Millennium platform and software solutions. A summary of the Company’s total software development expense for 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

•

General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues were 7% in both 2006 and 2005. Total general and administrative expenses were $95,881,000 and $81,620,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase was due primarily to growth in the Company’s core business and increased presence in the global market. General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees and the transaction gains or losses on foreign currency. The Company had net transaction gains on foreign currency of $3,764,000 for 2006 compared to $2,700,000 for 2005.

•

2005 includes a write-off of in process research and development in the amount of $3,941,000, net of $2,441,000 tax benefit, related to the acquisition of the medical division of VitalWorks.

Net interest expense was $697,000 in 2006 compared to $5,858,000 in 2005. Interest income increased to $11,877,000 in 2006 from $3,871,000 in 2005, due primarily to higher interest rates and a higher cash balance. Interest expense increased to $12,574,000 in 2006 from $9,729,000 in 2005, due primarily to a higher level of debt during 2006.

Other income was $2,074,000 in 2006 compared to $666,000 in 2005. Included in other income is income from office space leased to third parties. 2006 other income also includes a gain recorded in the first quarter of 2006 related to the renegotiation of a supplier contract that eliminated a liability related to unfavorable future commitments due to that supplier. The Company was able to renegotiate the contract to eliminate certain minimum volume requirements and reduce pricing to market rates leading to the elimination of the previously recorded liability. The increase in other income in 2006 was driven by this gain and by higher lease income.

The Company’s effective tax rate was 34% and 36% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Tax expense for 2006 includes benefits of approximately $1,994,000 for adjustments relating to prior periods. Tax expense for 2005 includes an adjustment that reduced tax expense related to a prior period for a tax benefit from the carry-back of a capital loss generated by the sale of Zynx of $4,749,000. Adjusting for these items, the effective tax rates were 36% and 40% in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Operations by Segment

The Company has two operating segments, Domestic and Global.

The following table presents a summary of the operating information for the years ended 2006 and 2005:

Domestic Segment

The Company’s domestic segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures associated with business activity in the United States.

Operating earnings increased 17% to $607,003,000 in 2006 from $517,610,000 in 2005.

	•		Revenues increased 12% to $1,166,662,000 in 2006 from $1,043,804,000 in 2005. This increase was primarily driven by growth in managed and professional services.
	•		Cost of revenues was basically unchanged at 22% and 23% in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
	•		Operating expenses increased 7% for the year ended December 30, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, due primarily to growth in professional and managed services.

Global Segment

The Company’s global segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures linked to business activity outside of the United States, which for 2006 and 2005 included: in Australia, Canada, China (Hong Kong), England, France, Germany, India, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain and the United Arab Emirates.

Operating earnings increased 26% to $60,572,000 in 2006 from $48,030,000 in 2005.

	•		Revenues increased 83% to $207,367,000 in 2006 from $113,317,000 in 2005. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from the Company’s participation in the National Health Service (NHS) initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical records in England. Revenue related to the NHS initiative that is being accounted for at zero-margin totaled $69,000,000 and $14,000,000 for the, 2006 and 2005 fiscal years, respectively. These revenues did not affect operating earnings as the Company is accounting for them at zero-margin using a zero-margin approach of applying percentage-of-completion accounting until either the software customization and development services are completed or the Company is able to determine fair value for the support services. The Company expects to recognize margin on the arrangements by 2009. The remaining unrecognized portion of the fee will be recognized over the remaining term of the arrangement, which expires in 2014.
	•		Cost of revenues was 19% and 15% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in costs of revenues as a percent of total revenues was driven by a much higher level of global hardware sales in 2006 compared to 2005.
	•		Operating expenses for the year ended December 30, 2006 increased 124%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to hiring personnel for the projects in England and supporting growth in other global regions.

Other Segment

The Company’s Other segment includes revenues and expenses which are not tracked by geographic segment.

Operating losses increased 18% to $501,408,000 in 2006 from $425,204,000 in 2005. This increase was primarily due to an increase in operating expenses such as software development, marketing, general and administrative, share-based compensation expense and depreciation. Operating expenses in the 2005 period includes the write-off of acquired in-process research and development of $6,382,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s liquidity is influenced by many factors, including the amount and timing of the Company’s revenues, its cash collections from its clients and the amounts the Company invests in software development, acquisitions and capital expenditures.

The Company’s principal source of liquidity is its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents consist of U.S. Government Federal Agency Securities, short-term marketable securities and overnight repurchase agreements. At December 29, 2007 the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $182,914,000, short-term investments of $161,600,000 and working capital of $530,441,000 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $162,545,000, short-term investments of $146,239,000 and working capital of $444,656,000 at December 30, 2006.

At December 29, 2007, we held approximately $162 million of auction rate securities, classified as short-term investments, with an auction reset feature (“auction rate securities”) whose underlying assets are generally student loans which are substantially backed by various state governments. There were successful auctions for all of the securities held at December 29, 2007. At February 14, 2008, we held approximately $122 million of auction rate securities. In February 2008, auctions failed for $36 million

of our auction rate securities, and there is no assurance that currently successful auctions on the other auction rate securities in our investment portfolio will continue to succeed, and as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not. All of our auction rate securities, including those subject to the failure, are currently rated AAA the highest rating, by a rating agency. If the issuers are unable to successfully close future auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate, we may in the future be required to record an impairment charge on these investments. We believe we will be able to liquidate our investment without significant loss within the next year, and we currently believe these securities are not significantly impaired, primarily due to the government guarantees and AAA ratings of the underlying securities, however, it could take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to 30 years) to realize our investments’ recorded value. Based on our expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the potential lack of liquidity on these investments to affect our ability to execute our current business plan.

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

The Company generated cash of $274,565,000, $232,718,000 and $228,865,000 from operations in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash flow from operations increased in 2007 due primarily to a stronger performance in net earnings. The Company has periodically provided long-term financing options to creditworthy clients through third party financing institutions and has directly provided extended payment terms to clients from contract date. These extended payment term arrangements typically provide for date based payments over periods ranging from 12 months to seven years. Pursuant to SOP 97-2, because a significant portion of the fee is due beyond one year, we have analyzed our history with these types of arrangements and have concluded that we do have a standard business practice of using extended payment term arrangements and have a long history of successfully collecting under the original payment terms for arrangements with similar clients, product offerings and economics without granting concessions. Accordingly, we consider the fee to be fixed and determinable in these extended payment term arrangements and, thus, the timing of revenue is not impacted by the existence of extended payments. Some of these payment streams have been assigned on a non-recourse basis to third party financing institutions. The Company has provided its usual and customary performance guarantees to the third party financing institutions in connection with its on-going obligations under the client contract. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company received total client cash collections of $1,646,584,000, $1,457,603,000 and $1,200,595,000, respectively, of which approximately 5%, 7% and 7% were received from third party client financing arrangements and non-recourse payment assignments, respectively. The days sales outstanding increased to 90 days for the quarter ended December 29, 2007 compared to 87 days for the quarter ended December 30, 2006. Revenues provided under support and maintenance agreements represent recurring cash flows. Support and maintenance revenues increased 17% in 2007 and 15% in 2006, and the Company expects these revenues to continue to grow as the base of installed systems grows.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities in 2007 consisted primarily of capital purchases of $180,723,000, which includes $105,678,000 of capital equipment and $75,045,000 of land, buildings and improvements and business acquisitions totaling $24,061,000. Capitalized software development costs were $66,063,000 in 2007. Cash paid for short-term investments, net of sales and maturities was $13,277,000 in 2007. Cash used in investing activities in 2006 consisted primarily of capital purchases of $131,478,000, which includes $70,299,000 of capital equipment and $61,179,000 of land, buildings and improvements. Capitalized software development costs were $61,223,000 and the acquisition of businesses totaled $13,731,000. Cash provided by sales and maturities of short-term investments, net of purchases, was $29,122,000 in 2006.

In the second quarter of 2007, the Company completed the construction of a new data center on its world headquarters campus in North Kansas City, Missouri. The Company spent approximately $61,203,000 on this construction project. Of this amount, $34,345,000 was spent in 2006 and the remaining amount was spent in 2007.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

The Company’s 2007 financing activities consisted primarily of proceeds from the exercise of options of $29,085,000, the excess tax benefit from share-based compensation of $30,357,000 and repayment of long-term debt of $22,359,000. In 2006, the Company’s financing activities consisted primarily of proceeds from the exercise of options of $21,704,000, the excess tax benefit from share-based compensation of $7,068,000 and repayment of long-term debt of $30,783,000.

In December 2007, the Company had a one-day borrowing of $40,000,000 from its line of credit which was repaid on the following day. This was in connection with tax incentives related to the World Headquarters data center. The Company does not expect this to be necessary in future periods.

In November 2005, the Company completed a £65,000,000 ($129,779,000 at December 29, 2007) private placement of debt at 5.54% pursuant to a Note Agreement. The Note Agreement is payable in seven equal annual installments beginning in November 2009. The proceeds were used to repay the outstanding amount under the Company’s credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The Note Agreement contains certain net worth and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 29, 2007.

In December 2002, the Company completed a $60,000,000 private placement of debt pursuant to a Note Agreement. The Series A Senior Notes, with a $21,000,000 principal amount at 5.57%, are payable in three equal installments that commenced in December 2006. The Series B Senior notes, with a $39,000,000 principal amount at 6.42%, are payable in four equal annual installments beginning December 2009. The proceeds were used to repay the outstanding amount under the Company’s credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The Note Agreement contains certain net worth and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 29, 2007.

In May 2002, the Company expanded its credit facility by entering into an unsecured credit agreement with a group of banks led by US Bank. This agreement was amended and restated on November 30, 2006, and provides for a current revolving line of credit for working capital purposes. The current revolving line of credit is unsecured and requires monthly payments of interest only. Interest is payable at the Company’s option at a rate based on prime (7.25% at December 29, 2007) or LIBOR (4.73% at December 29, 2007) plus 1.55%. The interest rate may be reduced by up to 1.15% if certain net worth ratios are maintained. The agreement contains certain net worth, current ratio, and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. A commitment fee of 2/10% is payable quarterly based on the usage of the revolving line of credit. The revolving line of credit matures on May 31, 2010. On January 10, 2005, the Company drew down $35,000,000 from its revolving line of credit in connection with the acquisition of the medical business division of VitalWorks. (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.) This amount was paid in full as of December 31, 2005. At December 29, 2007, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this agreement and had $90,000,000 available for working capital purposes. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 29, 2007.

In April 1999, the Company completed a $100,000,000 private placement of debt pursuant to a Note Agreement. The Series A Senior Notes, with a $60,000,000 principal amount at 7.14%, were paid in full in 2006. The Series B Senior Notes, with a $40,000,000 principal amount at 7.66%, are payable in six equal annual installments which commenced in April 2004. The proceeds were used to retire the Company’s existing $30,000,000 of debt, and the remaining funds were used for capital improvements and to strengthen the Company’s cash position. The Note Agreement contains certain net worth, current ratio, and fixed charge coverage covenants and provides certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 29, 2007.

The Company believes that its present cash position, together with cash generated from operations and, if necessary, its lines of credit, will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements during 2008.

The following table represents a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments, excluding interest, as of December 29, 2007, except short-term purchase order commitments arising in the ordinary course of business.

The effects of inflation on the Company’s business during 2007, 2006 and 2005 were not significant.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements.” This statement establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value when accounting rules require the use of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of SFAS 157 on its results of operations and its financial position and will be required to adopt SFAS 157 as of the first day of the 2008 fiscal year. The effect of adopting SFAS 157 is not expected to be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS 159), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This statement provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of SFAS 159 on its results of operations and its financial position and will be required to adopt SFAS 159 as of the first day of the 2008 fiscal year. The effect of adopting SFAS 159 is not expected to be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)) which replaces SFAS 141 and supersedes FIN 4, “Applicability of FASB Statement No. 2 to Business Combinations Accounted for by the Purchase Method”. SFAS 141(R) establishes guidelines for how an acquirer measures and recognizes the identifiable assets, goodwill, noncontrolling interest, and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Additionally, SFAS 141(R) outlines the disclosures necessary to allow financial statement users to assess the impact of the acquisition. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of SFAS 141(R) on its results of operations and its financial position, which is expected to be immaterial, and will be required to adopt SFAS 141(R) prospectively for business combinations occurring on or after the first day of the 2009 fiscal year.

Also in December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS 160), “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”, which amends ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 guides that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements, and that net income should be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of SFAS 160 on its results of operations, which is expected to be immaterial, and its financial position and will be required to adopt SFAS 160 as of the first day of the 2009 fiscal year.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company believes that there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding the Company’s historical and future performance, as these policies affect the reported amount of revenue and other significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, software development, potential impairments of goodwill and income taxes. These policies and the Company’s procedures related to these policies are described in detail below and under specific areas within this “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” In addition, Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements expands upon discussion of the Company’s accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes its multiple element arrangements, including software and software-related services, using the residual method under SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP No. 98-4, SOP 98-9 and clarified by Staff Accounting Bulletin’s (SAB) 104 “Revenue Recognition” and Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). Key factors in the Company’s revenue recognition model are management’s assessments that installation services are essential to the functionality of the Company’s software whereas implementation services are not; and the length of time it takes for the Company to achieve its delivery and installation milestones for its licensed software. If the Company’s business model were to change such that implementation services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the

Company’s software, the period of time over which the Company’s licensed software revenue would be recognized would lengthen. The Company generally recognizes combined revenue from the sale of its licensed software and related installation services over two key milestones, delivery and installation, based on percentages that reflect the underlying effort from planning to installation. Generally, both milestones are achieved in the quarter the contracts are executed. If the period of time to achieve the Company’s delivery and installation milestones for its licensed software were to lengthen, its milestones would be adjusted and the timing of revenue recognition for its licensed software could materially change.

The Company also recognizes revenue for certain projects using the percentage of completion method pursuant to Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts , as prescribed by SOP 97-2. The Company’s revenue recognition is dependent upon the Company’s ability to reliably estimate the direct labor hours to complete a project. The Company utilizes its historical project experience as a basis for its future estimates to complete current projects.

Software Development Costs

Costs incurred internally in creating computer software solutions and enhancements to those solutions are expensed until completion of a detailed program design, which is when the Company determines that technological feasibility has been established. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized until such time as the software solutions and enhancements are available for general release, and the capitalized costs subsequently are reported at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is computed as the estimated gross future revenues from each software solution less the amount of estimated future costs of completing and disposing of that product. Because the development of projected net future revenues related to our software solutions used in our net realizable value computation is based on estimates, a significant reduction in our future revenues could impact the recovery of our capitalized software development costs. We historically have not experienced significant inaccuracies in computing the net realizable value of our software solutions and the difference between the net realizable value and the unamortized cost has grown over the past three years. We expect that trend to continue in the future. If we missed our estimates of net future revenues by up to 10%, the amount of our capitalized software development costs would not be impaired. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and expected net future revenue for each software solution with minimum annual amortization equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated economic life of the software solution. The Company is amortizing capitalized costs over five years. The five-year period over which capitalized software development costs are amortized is an estimate based upon the Company’s forecast of a reasonable useful life for the capitalized costs. Historically, use of the Company’s software programs by its clients has exceeded five years and is capable of being used a decade or more.

The Company expects that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and systems integrators and others specializing in the healthcare industry may offer competitive products or services. The pace of change in the HIT market is rapid and there are frequent new product introductions, product enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, the capitalized software solutions may become less valuable or obsolete and could be subject to impairment.

Goodwill

The Company accounts for its goodwill under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” As a result, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever there is an impairment indicator. All goodwill is assigned to a reporting unit, where it is subject to an annual impairment test based on fair value. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment in the second quarter of each fiscal year and evaluates impairment indicators at each quarter end. The Company assessed its goodwill for impairment in the second quarters of 2007 and 2006 and concluded that no goodwill was impaired. The Company used a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of the reporting units for all periods. Goodwill amounted to $143,924,000 and $128,819,000 at December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively. If future, anticipated cash flows from the Company’s reporting units that recognized goodwill do not materialize as expected the Company’s goodwill could be impaired, which could result in significant write-offs.

Income Taxes

In 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an enterprise’s tax return. Management makes a number of assumptions and estimates in determining the appropriate amount of expense to record for income taxes. These assumptions and estimates consider the taxing jurisdiction in which the Company operates as well as current tax regulations. Accruals are established for estimates of tax effects for certain transactions, business structures and future projected profitability of the Company’s businesses based on management’s interpretation of existing facts and circumstances. If these assumptions and estimates were to change as a result of new evidence or changes in circumstances the change in estimate could result in a material adjustment to the consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted FIN 48 effective at the beginning of 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have any impact on Cerner’s consolidated financial position. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures related to FIN 48.

Our management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the Company’s disclosure contained herein.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

At December 29, 2007, the Company had a £65,000,000 ($129,779,000 at December 29, 2007) note payable outstanding through a private placement with an interest rate of 5.54%. The note is payable in seven equal installments beginning in November 2009. Because the borrowing is denominated in pounds, the Company is exposed to movements in the foreign currency exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Great Britain pound. The note was entered into for other than trading purposes. Beginning in 2006, at the beginning of each quarterly period, the Company designated a portion (between £60 million and £63 million during the year) of its debt (£65 million) that is denominated in Great Britain Pounds, to hedge its net investment in England. During 2007 the Company designated all £65 million of its debt that is denominated in Great Britain Pounds.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Financial Statements and Notes required by this Item are submitted as a separate part of this report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9.A. Controls and Procedures

a)

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report (the “Evaluation Date”). They have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities and would be disclosed on a timely basis. The CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. They have also concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are accumulated and communicated to the Company’s

management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

	b)		There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended December 29, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.
	c)		The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at that reasonable assurance level. However, the Company’s management can provide no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can prevent all errors and all fraud under all circumstances. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been or will be detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2007. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The Company’s management has concluded that, as of December 29, 2007, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in the annual report has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein under “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.

Item 9.B. Other Information

None.

Item 10 by reference. The information required by this Item 10 concerning our Audit Committee and our Audit Committee financial expert will be set forth under the caption “Audit Committee” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 10 by reference.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since our last disclosure thereof.

The following table set forth the names, ages, positions and certain other information regarding the Company’s executive officers as of February 22, 2008. Officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Neal L. Patterson has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for more than five years. Mr. Patterson also served as President of the Company from March of 1999 until August of 1999.

Clifford W. Illig has been a Director of the Company for more than five years. He also served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company for more than five years until October 1998 and as President of the Company for more than five years until March of 1999. Mr. Illig was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors in March of 1999.

Earl H. Devanny, III joined the Company in August of 1999 as President. Mr. Devanny also served as interim President of Cerner Southeast from January 2003 through July 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Devanny served as president of ADAC Healthcare Information Systems, Inc. Prior to joining ADAC, Mr. Devanny served as a Vice President of the Company from 1994 to 1997. Prior to that he spent 17 years with IBM Corporation.

Douglas M. Krebs joined the Company in June 1994 as a Regional Vice President. He was promoted to Senior Vice President and Area Manager in April 1999. In February 2000, Mr. Krebs was appointed as President of Cerner Global and in January 2005, Mr. Krebs was appointed General Manager of the Company’s Global Organization. Prior to joining Cerner, he spent 15 years with IBM Corporation.

Marc G. Naughton joined the Company in November 1992 as Manager of Taxes. In November 1995 he was named Chief Financial Officer and in February 1996 he was promoted to Vice President. He was promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2002.

Jeffrey A. Townsend joined the Company in June 1985. Since that time he has held several positions in the Intellectual Property Organization and was promoted to Vice President in February 1997. He was

appointed Chief Engineering Officer in March 1998, promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2001 and promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2005.

Mike Valentine joined the Company in December 1998 as Director of Technology. He was promoted to Vice President in 2000 and to President of Cerner Mid America in January of 2003. In February 2005, he was named General Manager of the U.S. Client Organization and was promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2005. He was promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Valentine was with Accenture Consulting.

Randy D. Sims joined the Company in March 1997 as Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sims worked at Farmland Industries, Inc. for three years where he served most recently as Associate General Counsel. Prior to Farmland, Mr. Sims was in-house legal counsel at The Marley Company for seven years, holding the position of Assistant General Counsel when he left to join Farmland.

Julia M. Wilson joined the Company in November 1995. Since that time, she has held several positions in the Functional Group Organization. She was promoted to Vice President and Chief People Officer in August 2003 and to Senior Vice President in March 2007.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item 11 concerning our executive compensation will be set forth under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference. The information required by this Item 11 concerning Compensation Committee interlocks and insider participation will be set forth under the caption “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference. The information required by this Item 11 concerning Compensation Committee report will be set forth under the caption “Compensation Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item 12 will be set forth under the caption “Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 12 by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item 13 concerning our transactions with related parties will be set forth under the caption “Certain Transactions” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 13 by reference. The information required by this Item 13 concerning director independence will be set forth under the caption “Director Independence” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 13 by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item 14 will be set forth under the caption “Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held May 23, 2008, and is incorporated in this Item 14 by reference.

Number		Description
4(c)		Cerner Corporation Note Agreement dated April 1, 1999 among Cerner Corporation, Principal Life Insurance Company, Principal Life Insurance Company, on behalf of one or more separate accounts, Commercial Union Life Insurance Company of America, Nippon Life Insurance Company of America, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company, and Investors Partner Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 4(e) to Registrant’s Form 8-K dated April 23, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
4(d)		Note Purchase Agreement between Cerner Corporation and the purchasers therein, dated December 15, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10(x) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
4(e)		Cerner Corporation Note Purchase Agreement dated November 1, 2005 among Cerner Corporation, as issuer, and AIG Annuity Insurance Company, American General Life Insurance Company and Principal Life Insurance Company, as purchasers, (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10(a)		Indemnification Agreement Form for use between the Registrant and its Directors (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(b)		Employment Agreement of Earl H. Devanny, III dated August 13, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10(q) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(c)		Amended & Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Neal L. Patterson dated January 1, 2008.*
10(d)		Amended Stock Option Plan D of Registrant dated December 8, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10(f) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(e)		Amended Stock Option Plan E of Registrant dated December 8, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10(g) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(f)		Cerner Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan F (filed as Annex I to Registrant’s 2001 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(g)		Cerner Corporation 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan G Amended & Restated dated October 1, 2007.*
10(h)		Cerner Corporation 2001 Associate Stock Purchase Plan (filed as Annex II to Registrant’s 2001 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(i)		Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan dated December 3, 2007.*
10(j)		Form of 2007 Executive Performance Agreement (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K on April 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(k)		Cerner Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended & Restated dated January 1, 2008.*
10(l)		Cerner Corporation 2005 Enhanced Severance Pay Plan as Amended and Restated dated January 1, 2008.*

Number		Description
10(m)		Cerner Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan F Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10(v) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(n)		Cerner Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan F Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Certificate (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(o)		Cerner Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan F Nonqualified Stock Option Director Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10(x) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(p)		Cerner Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan F Director Restricted Stock Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10(w) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10(q)		Cerner Corporation 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan G Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Certificate.*
10(r)		Time Sharing Agreements between the Registrant and Neal L. Patterson and Clifford W. Illig, both dated February 7, 2007 (filed as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3, respectively, to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10(s)		Aircraft Services Agreement between the Registrant’s wholly owned subsidiary, Rockcreek Aviation, Inc., and PANDI, Inc., dated February 6, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).*
		*Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be identified by Item15(a)(3)
11		Computation of Registrant’s Earnings Per Share. (Exhibit omitted. Information contained in notes to consolidated financial statements.)
21		Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1		Certification of Neal L. Patterson pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Marc G. Naughton pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	(b)		Exhibits.
			The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.
	(c)		Financial Statement Schedules.
			The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature and Title		Date
/s/ Neal L. Patterson   Neal L. Patterson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)		February 27, 2008
/s/ Clifford W. Illig   Clifford W. Illig, Vice Chairman and Director		February 27, 2008
/s/ Marc G. Naughton   Marc G. Naughton, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)		February 27, 2008
/s/ Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr.   Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., Ph.D., Director		February 27, 2008
/s/ John C. Danforth   John C. Danforth, Director		February 27, 2008
/s/ Nancy-Ann DeParle   Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director		February 27, 2008
/s/ Michael E. Herman   Michael E. Herman, Director		February 27, 2008
/s/ William B. Neaves   William B. Neaves, Ph.D., Director		February 27, 2008
/s/ William D. Zollars   William D. Zollars, Director		February 27, 2008

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cerner Corporation:

We have audited Cerner Corporation’s (the Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Report over Internal Control of Financial Reporting,” appearing in Item 9.A. Controls and Procedures. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Cerner Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2007, and our report dated February 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

(signed) KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 27, 2008

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cerner Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries (the Corporation) as of December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” effective January 1, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Cerner Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
February 27, 2008

Management’s Report

The management of Cerner Corporation is responsible for the consolidated financial statements and all other information presented in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances, and, therefore, included in the financial statements are certain amounts based on management’s informed estimates and judgments. Other financial information in this report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Cerner Corporation’s independent registered public accountants and have been reviewed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.