SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 0-3722
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
Georgia
|
58-1027114 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.) |
|
4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., | ||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
30319 | |
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
(Zip code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting and nonvoting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003, the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $13,284,152. On March 19, 2004 there were 21,272,604 shares of the registrants common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
1. Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held on May 4, 2004, have been incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
The Company
Atlantic American Corporation, a Georgia
corporation incorporated in 1968 (the Parent or
Company), is a holding company that operates through
its subsidiaries in well-defined specialty markets of the life,
health, property and casualty insurance industries. Atlantic
Americans principal subsidiaries are American Southern
Insurance Company and American Safety Insurance Company
(collectively known as American Southern),
Association Casualty Insurance Company and Association Risk
Management General Agency, Inc. (collectively known as
Association Casualty), Georgia Casualty &
Surety Company (Georgia Casualty) and Bankers
Fidelity Life Insurance Company (Bankers Fidelity).
The Companys strategy is to focus on
well-defined geographic, demographic and/or product niches
within the insurance market place. The underwriting function of
each of the Companys subsidiaries operates with relative
autonomy, which allows for quick reaction to market
opportunities. In addition, the Company seeks to develop and
expand cross-selling opportunities and other synergies among its
subsidiaries as they arise.
The Companys casualty operations are
composed of three distinct entities, American Southern,
Association Casualty and Georgia Casualty. The primary products
offered by the casualty group are described below, followed by
an overview of each company.
American Southern.
American Southern provides tailored fleet automobile and
long-haul physical damage insurance coverage, on a multi-year
contract basis, to state governments, local municipalities and
other large motor pools and fleets (block accounts)
that can be specifically rated and underwritten. The size of the
block accounts insured by American Southern are such that
individual class experience generally can be determined, which
allows for customized policy terms and rates. American Southern
produces business in 20 of the 25 states in the Southeast
and Midwest in which it is authorized to conduct business.
Additionally, American Southern provides personal automobile
insurance to the members of the Carolina Motor Club, Inc.
(AAA Carolinas), an affiliate of the American
Automobile Association. While the majority of American
Southerns premiums are derived from auto liability and
auto physical damage, American Southern also provides property,
general liability and surety coverage.
2
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, the allocation of American Southerns net earned
premiums for each of its principal product lines:
Georgia Casualty.
Georgia Casualty is a property-casualty insurance company
providing workers compensation, property, general
liability, automobile, umbrella, inland marine and mechanical
breakdown coverage to businesses throughout the Southeastern
United States. Georgia Casualtys primary marketing focus
is toward small to middle market accounts with low to moderate
hazard grades, ranging from $20,000 to $250,000 in written
premiums. In addition to the wide range of commercial products
available, Georgia Casualty offers customized products for nine
classes of business, including, but not limited to, light
manufacturing, restaurants, golf clubs and artisan contractors.
These products, along with innovative risk management services
and exceptional claims handling, are offered through an
exclusive network of independent agents. Georgia Casualty is
licensed to do business in thirteen states. Its principal
marketing territories include Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, the allocation of Georgia Casualtys net earned
premiums for each of its principal product lines:
Association
Casualty.
Association Casualty is a
property-casualty insurance company that offers workers
compensation, commercial property, commercial automobile,
general liability, umbrella and inland marine coverages
throughout Texas. Association Casualty has adopted a strategy
consistent with that of Georgia Casualty and is focused on small
to middle market accounts with low to moderate hazard grades,
ranging from $15,000 to $250,000 in written premium. In addition
to this wide range of products, customized coverages are offered
to six classes of business, including restaurants, light
manufacturing and country clubs. These particular products are
coupled with specialized loss control and claims services and
are offered through an exclusive network of independent agents.
Association Casualty is licensed to do business in eight states.
3
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, the allocation of Association Casualtys net
earned premiums for each of its principal product lines since
its acquisition by the Company.
Bankers Fidelity.
Bankers Fidelity constitutes the life and health operations of
the Company and offers a variety of life and supplemental health
products with a focus on the senior markets. Products offered by
Bankers Fidelity include: ordinary life, Medicare Supplement,
cancer, and other supplemental health insurance products. Health
business, primarily Medicare Supplement, accounted for 78.4% of
Bankers Fidelitys net earned premiums in 2003. Life
insurance, including both whole and term life insurance
policies, accounted for 21.6% of Bankers Fidelitys
premiums in 2003. In terms of the number of policies written in
2003, 34% were life policies and 66% were health policies.
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, the allocation of Bankers Fidelitys net earned
premiums for each of its principal product lines followed by a
brief description of the principal products:
Life Products
include non-participating individual
term and whole life insurance policies with a variety of riders
and options.
Medicare Supplement
includes 5 of the 10 standardized
Medicare supplement policies created under the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 1990), which are
designed to provide insurance coverage for certain expenses not
covered by the Medicare program, including copayments and
deductibles.
Cancer, Accident & Other Health
Coverages
include several policies
providing for payment of benefits in connection with the
treatment of diagnosed cancer, as well as a number of other
policies including short-term care, accident expense,
hospital/surgical and disability.
4
Marketing
American Southern.
A
portion of American Southerns business is marketed through
a small number of specialized, experienced independent agents.
Most of American Southerns agents are paid a moderate
up-front commission with the potential for additional commission
by participating in a profit sharing arrangement that is
directly linked to the profitability of the business generated.
In arrangements similar to those with its agents, the premium
assumed from some of these parties is adjusted based upon the
profitability of the assumed business. American Southern also
solicits business from governmental entities. As an experienced
writer for certain governmental programs, the company actively
pursues this market on a direct basis. Much of this business is
priced by means of competitive bid situations and there can be
no assurance that the company can retain such business at
contract renewal. During 1998, American Southern formed American
Auto Club Insurance Agency, LLC in a 50/50 joint venture with
AAA Carolinas to market personal automobile insurance to the
members of the automobile club. This program produced gross
written premiums of approximately $8.3 million during 2003.
Association
Casualty.
Association Casualty is
represented by a field force of 69 independent agencies with 92
locations in Texas for the sale and distribution of its
insurance products. Each agency is a party to a standard agency
contract that sets forth the commission structure and other
terms and can be terminated by either party. Association
Casualty also offers a contingent profit sharing arrangement
that allows agents to earn additional commissions when specific
loss experience and premium growth goals are achieved. Marketing
efforts are handled by an experienced staff of insurance
professionals, and complimented by the assistance of the
underwriting, loss control and claims staffs.
Georgia Casualty.
Georgia Casualty is represented by a field force of 60
independent agencies with 101 locations in eight states for the
sale and distribution of its insurance products. Each agency is
a party to a standard agency contract that sets forth the
commission structure and other terms and can be terminated by
either party. Georgia Casualty also offers a contingent
profit-sharing arrangement that allows agents to earn additional
commissions when specific loss experience and premium growth
goals are achieved. Marketing efforts, directed by experienced
marketing professionals, are complimented by the underwriting,
risk management, and audit staffs of Georgia Casualty, who are
available to assist agents in the presentation of all insurance
products and services to their insureds.
Bankers Fidelity.
Bankers Fidelity markets its policies through commissioned,
independent agents. In general, Bankers Fidelity enters
contractual arrangements with general agents who, in turn,
contract with independent agents. The standard agreements set
forth the commission arrangements and are terminable by either
party upon thirty days written notice. General agents receive an
override commission on sales made by agents contracted by them.
Management believes utilizing experienced agents as well as
independent general agents who recruit and train their own
agents, is cost effective. All independent agents are
compensated on a pure commission basis. Using independent agents
also enables Bankers Fidelity to expand or contract its sales
forces at any time without incurring significant additional
expense.
Bankers Fidelity has implemented a selective
agent qualification process and had 2,533 licensed agents as of
December 31, 2003. The agents concentrate their sales
activities in either the accident and health or life insurance
product lines. During 2003, a total of 885 agents wrote policies
on behalf of Bankers Fidelity.
Products of Bankers Fidelity compete directly
with products offered by other insurance companies, as agents
may represent several insurance companies. Bankers Fidelity, in
an effort to motivate agents to market its products, offers the
following agency services: a unique lead system, competitive
products and commission structures, efficient claims service,
prompt payment of commissions that immediately vest, simplified
policy issue procedures, periodic sales incentive programs and,
in some cases, protected sales territories determined based on
specific counties and/or zip codes.
5
Bankers Fidelity utilizes a distribution sales
system which is centered around a lead generation plan that
rewards qualified agents with leads in accordance with monthly
production goals. In addition, a protected territory is
established for each qualified agent, which entitles them to all
leads produced within that territory. The territories are zip
code or county based and encompass sufficient geographical
territory to produce a minimum senior population of 12,000.
Bankers Fidelity also recruits at a general agent level rather
than at a managing general agent level in an effort to reduce
commission expenses further.
The Company believes this distribution system
solves an agents most important dilemma
prospecting and allows Bankers Fidelity to build
long-term relationships with individual producers who view
Bankers Fidelity as their primary company. In addition,
management believes that Bankers Fidelitys product line is
less sensitive to competitor pricing and commissions because of
the perceived value of the protected territory and the lead
generation plan. In protected geographical areas, production per
agent compares favorably to unprotected areas served by the
general brokerage division.
Underwriting
American Southern specializes in the handling of
block accounts, such as states and municipalities that generally
are sufficiently large to establish separate class experience,
relying upon the underwriting expertise of its agents. In
contrast, Georgia Casualty and Association Casualty internally
underwrite all of their accounts.
During the course of the policy year, extensive
use is made of risk management representatives to assist
underwriters in identifying and correcting potential loss
exposures and to pre-inspect a majority of the new underwritten
accounts. The results of each product line are reviewed on a
stand-alone basis. When the results are below expectations,
management takes appropriate corrective action which may include
raising rates, reviewing underwriting standards, reducing
commissions paid to agents, altering or declining to renew
accounts at expiration, and/or terminating agencies with an
unprofitable book of business.
American Southern also acts as a reinsurer with
respect to all of the risks associated with certain automobile
policies issued by various state administrative agencies, naming
the state and various local governmental entities as insureds.
Premiums written from such policies constituted
$5.5 million, or 12.5%, of American Southerns gross
premiums written in 2003 as compared to $18.7 million in
2002 and $20.4 million in 2001.
Bankers Fidelity issues a variety of products for
both life and health, which includes senior life products
typically with small face amounts of not less than $1,000 and up
to $30,000 and Medicare Supplement. The majority of its products
are Yes or No applications that are
underwritten on a non-medical basis. Bankers Fidelity offers
products to all age groups; however its primary focus is the
senior market. For life products other than the senior market,
Bankers Fidelity may require medical information such as medical
examinations subject to age and face amount based on published
guidelines. Approximately 95% of the net premiums earned for
both life and health insurance sold during 2003 were derived
from insurance written below Bankers Fidelitys medical
limits. For the senior market, Bankers Fidelity issues products
primarily on an accept-or-reject basis with face amounts up to
$30,000 for ages 45-70, $20,000 for ages 71-80 and
$10,000 for ages 81-85. Bankers Fidelity retains a maximum
amount of $50,000 with respect to any individual life (see
Reinsurance).
Applications for insurance are reviewed to
determine the face amount, age, and medical history. Depending
upon information obtained from the insured, Medical Information
Bureau (M.I.B.) report, paramedical testing, and/or medical
records, special testing may be ordered. If deemed necessary,
Bankers Fidelity may use investigative services to supplement
and substantiate information. For certain limited coverages,
Bankers Fidelity has adopted simplified policy issue procedures
by which an application containing a variety of Yes/No health
related questions is submitted. For these plans, a M.I.B. report
is
6
Policyholder and Claims Services
The Company believes that prompt, efficient
policyholder and claims services are essential to its continued
success in marketing its insurance products (see
Competition). Additionally, the Company believes
that its insureds are particularly sensitive to claims
processing time and to the accessibility of qualified staff to
answer inquiries. Accordingly, the Companys policyholder
and claims services seek to offer expeditious disposition of
service requests by providing toll-free access to all customers,
24-hour claim reporting services, and direct computer links with
some of its largest accounts. The Company also utilizes a
state-of-the-art automatic call distribution system to insure
that inbound calls to customer service support groups are
processed efficiently. Operational data generated from this
system allows management to further refine ongoing client
service programs and service representative training modules.
The Company supports a Customer Awareness Program
as the basis for its customer service philosophy. All personnel
are required to attend customer service classes. Customer
service hours of operations have been expanded in all service
areas to serve customers and agents in all time zones.
American Southern, Association Casualty, and
Georgia Casualty control their claims costs by utilizing an
in-house staff of claim supervisors to investigate, verify,
negotiate and settle claims. Upon notification of an occurrence
purportedly giving rise to a claim, the claims department
conducts a preliminary investigation, determines whether an
insurable event has occurred and, if so, records the claim. The
casualty companies frequently utilize independent adjusters and
appraisers to service claims which require on-site inspections.
Insureds obtain claim forms by calling the claims
department customer service group. To shorten claim processing
time, a letter detailing all supporting documents that are
required to complete a claim for a particular policy is sent to
the customer along with the correct claim form. With respect to
life policies, the claim is entered into Bankers Fidelitys
claims system when the proper documentation is received.
Properly documented claims are generally paid within three to
nine business days of receipt. With regard to Medicare
Supplement policies, the claim is either directly billed to
Bankers Fidelity by the provider or sent electronically by using
a Medicare clearing house.
7
Reserves
The following table sets forth information
concerning the Companys reserves for losses and claims and
reserves for loss adjustment expenses (LAE) for the
periods indicated:
Atlantic Americans casualty operations
maintain loss reserves representing estimates of amounts
necessary for payment of losses and LAE. The casualty operations
also maintain incurred but not reported reserves and bulk
reserves for future development. These loss reserves are
estimates, based on known facts and circumstances at a given
point in time, of amounts the insurer expects to pay on incurred
claims. All balances are reviewed quarterly and annually by
qualified internal actuaries. Reserves for LAE are intended to
cover the ultimate costs of settling claims, including
investigation and defense of lawsuits resulting from such
claims. Loss reserves for reported claims are based on a
case-by-case evaluation of the type of claim involved, the
circumstances surrounding the claim, and the policy provisions
relating to the type of loss along with anticipated future
development. The LAE for claims reported and claims not reported
is based on historical statistical data and anticipated future
development. Inflation and other factors which may affect claim
payments are implicitly reflected in the reserving process
through analysis of cost trends and reviews of historical
reserve results.
The casualty operations establish reserves for
claims based upon: (a) managements estimate of
ultimate liability and claims adjusters evaluations for
unpaid claims reported prior to the close of the accounting
period, (b) estimates of incurred but not reported claims
based on past experience, and (c) estimates of LAE. The
estimated liability is continually reviewed and updated, and
changes to the estimated liability are recorded in the statement
of operations in the year in which such changes become known.
8
The table on the following page sets forth the
development of the balance sheet reserves for unpaid losses and
claims determined using generally accepted accounting principles
of the casualty operations insurance lines for 1993
through 2003. Development from acquired companies are included
from the year of acquisition. Specifically excluded from the
table on the following page are the life and health
divisions claims reserves, which are included in the
consolidated loss and claims reserves. The top line of the table
represents the estimated amount of losses and LAE for claims
arising in all prior years that were unpaid at the balance sheet
date for each of the indicated periods, including an estimate of
losses that have been incurred but not yet reported. The amounts
represent initial reserve estimates at the respective balance
sheet dates for the current and all prior years. The next
portion of the table shows the cumulative amounts paid with
respect to claims in each succeeding year. The lower portion of
the table shows the re-estimated amounts of previously recorded
reserves based on experience as of the end of each succeeding
year.
The reserve estimates are modified as more
information becomes known about the frequency and severity of
claims for individual years. The cumulative redundancy or
deficiency for each year represents the aggregate change
in such years estimates through the end of 2003. In
evaluating this information, it should be noted that the amount
of the redundancy or deficiency for any year represents the
cumulative amount of the changes from initial reserve estimates
for such year. Operations for any year may be affected,
favorably or unfavorably, by the amount of the change in the
estimate for such years; however, because such analysis is based
on the reserves for unpaid losses and claims, before
consideration of reinsurance, the total indicated redundancies
and/or deficiencies may not ultimately be reflected in the
Companys net income. Further, conditions and trends that
have affected development of the reserves in the past may not
necessarily occur in the future and there could be future events
or actions that would impact future development which have not
existed in the past. Accordingly, it is inappropriate to predict
future redundancies or deficiencies based on the data in the
following table.
9
Note: Because this analysis is based on
reserves for unpaid losses and claims, before consideration of
reinsurance, the total indicated redundancies and/or
deficiencies may not ultimately be reflected in the
Companys net income.
10
Bankers Fidelity establishes liabilities for
future policy benefits to meet projected future obligations
under outstanding policies. These reserves are calculated to
satisfy policy and contract obligations as they mature. The
amount of reserves for insurance policies is calculated using
assumptions for interest rates, mortality and morbidity rates,
expenses, and withdrawals. Reserves are adjusted periodically
based on published actuarial tables with modification to reflect
actual experience (see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).
Reinsurance
The Companys insurance subsidiaries
purchase reinsurance from unaffiliated insurers and reinsurers
to reduce their liability on individual risks and to protect
against catastrophic losses. In a reinsurance transaction, an
insurance company transfers, or cedes, a portion or
all of its exposure on insurance policies to a reinsurer. The
reinsurer assumes the exposure in return for a portion of the
premiums. The ceding of insurance does not legally discharge the
insurer from primary liability for the full amount of policies
written by it, and the ceding company incurs a loss if the
reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the reinsurance
agreement.
American Southern.
American Southern retains a maximum amount of $240,000 per
occurrence. Limits per occurrence within reinsurance treaties
are as follows: Fire, inland marine and commercial
automobile $125,000 excess $50,000 retention; All
other lines vary by type of policy and generally have retentions
in excess of $100,000, up to $240,000. American Southern
maintains a property catastrophe treaty with a $6.6 million
limit excess of $400,000 retention. American Southern also
issues surety bonds with face amounts up to $750,000 that are
not subject to reinsurance.
Association
Casualty.
Association Casualty retains
a maximum amount of $300,000 per occurrence on
workers compensation up to $20.0 million. Limits per
occurrence within the treaties are as follows: Automobile and
general liability $1.7 million excess $300,000
retention; Property $2.7 million excess
$300,000 retention. The property lines of coverage are protected
with an excess of loss treaty, which affords recovery for
property losses in excess of $3.0 million up to a maximum
of $15.0 million. Association Casualty maintains a property
catastrophe treaty with a $7.15 million limit excess of
$350,000.
Georgia Casualty.
Georgia Casualtys basic treaties cover all claims in
excess of $300,000 per occurrence. Limits per occurrence
within the treaties and excess of the retention are as follows:
Workers compensation $20.0 million;
Property per location $15.0 million; Excess of
policy and extra contractual obligations
$10.0 million; Liability $6.0 million; and
Surety $3.0 million. Georgia Casualty maintains
a property catastrophe treaty with a $7.15 million limit
excess of $350,000 retention. During 2003, Georgia Casualty
entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement to cover 20% of
the first $300,000 of occurrence losses and the first $350,000
of catastrophe losses on policies written from January 1,
2003 to December 31, 2003. Also in 2003, Georgia Casualty
terminated its 2002 30% quota share contract as of
December 31, 2003.
Bankers Fidelity.
Bankers Fidelity has entered into reinsurance contracts ceding
the excess of their retention to several primary reinsurers.
Maximum retention by Bankers Fidelity on any one individual in
the case of life insurance policies is $50,000. At
December 31, 2003, Bankers Fidelity reinsured
$25.0 million of the $305.8 million of life insurance
in force, generally under yearly renewable term agreements.
Certain prior year reinsurance agreements remain in force
although they no longer provide reinsurance for new business.
11
Competition
American Southern.
The businesses in which American Southern engages are highly
competitive. The principal areas of competition are pricing and
service. Many competing property and casualty companies, which
have been in business longer than American Southern, have
available more diversified lines of insurance and have
substantially greater financial resources. Management believes,
however, that the policies it sells are competitive with those
providing similar benefits offered by other insurers doing
business in the states where American Southern operates.
Association
Casualty.
The Texas market,
historically Association Casualtys primary market, is
extremely competitive. Association Casualtys competition
comes from carriers that are of a larger size than Association
Casualty as well as the state fund that writes monoline
workers compensation. Association Casualtys strong
focus and commitment to its target markets has enabled it to
forge stronger ties with the agency networks that exclusively
represent the company. Insurance products that provide a full
range of commercial coverage, as well as customized loss control
and claims services, position the agency partners to compete
effectively within their geographic location. Association
Casualty writes workers compensation coverage only as a
part of the total insurance package. Flexible commission
agreements award the greatest commissions to those agents that
demonstrate loyalty and commitment to Association Casualty
through continued premium growth and profitability. This further
allows Association Casualty to be competitive in the market
place.
Georgia Casualty.
Georgia Casualtys insurance business is also extremely
competitive. The competition can be placed in three categories:
(1) companies with higher A.M. Best ratings,
(2) alternative workers compensation markets, and
(3) self-insured funds. Georgia Casualtys efforts are
directed in the following three general categories where the
company has the best opportunity to control exposures and
claims: (1) manufacturing, (2) artisan contractors,
and (3) service industries. Management believes that
Georgia Casualtys key to being competitive in these areas
is maintaining strong underwriting standards, risk management
programs, writing workers compensation coverage as part of
the total insurance package, maintaining and expanding its loyal
network of agents and development of new agents in key
territories. In addition, Georgia Casualty offers quality
customer service to its agents and insureds, and provides
rehabilitation, medical management, and claims management
services to its insureds. Georgia Casualty believes that it will
continue to be competitive in the marketplace based on its
current strategies and services.
The life and health insurance business remains
highly competitive and includes a large number of insurance
companies, many of which have substantially greater financial
resources. Bankers Fidelity focuses on three core products in
the senior market; Medicare Supplement, small face amount life
insurance and short-term nursing home coverage. Bankers Fidelity
believes that the primary competitors in this market are
Continental Life, Standard Life & Accident, The London
Group, United American, American Pioneer and Blue Cross/ Blue
Shield. Bankers Fidelity competes with these as well as other
insurers on the basis of premium rates, policy benefits, and
service to policyholders. Bankers Fidelity also competes with
other insurers to attract and retain the allegiance of its
independent agents through commission arrangements,
accessibility and marketing assistance, lead programs,
reputation, and market expertise. Bankers Fidelity utilizes a
proprietary lead generation program to attract and retain
independent agents. Bankers Fidelity has expanded into other
markets through cross-selling strategies with the companys
sister property and casualty affiliations, offering turn-key
marketing programs to facilitate business through these
relationships. Bankers Fidelity continues to expand in niche
markets through long-term relationships with a select number of
independent marketing organizations including credit union
business and association endorsements. Bankers Fidelity has a
proven track record of competing in its chosen markets through
long-standing relationships with independent agents by providing
proprietary marketing initiatives and
12
Ratings
Ratings of insurance companies are not designed
for investors and do not constitute recommendations to buy,
sell, or hold any security. Ratings are important measures
within the insurance industry, and improved ratings should have
a favorable impact on the ability of a company to compete in the
marketplace.
Each year A.M Best Company, Inc. (A.M.
Best) publishes Bests Insurance Reports, which
includes assessments and ratings of all insurance companies.
A.M. Bests ratings, which may be revised quarterly, fall
into fifteen categories ranging from A++ (Superior) to F (in
liquidation). A.M. Bests ratings are based on a detailed
analysis of the financial condition and operations of an
insurance company compared to the industry in general.
American Southern.
American Southern and its wholly-owned subsidiary, American
Safety Insurance Company, are each currently rated
A- (Excellent) by A.M. Best.
Association
Casualty.
Association Casualty is
currently rated A- (Excellent) by A.M. Best.
Georgia Casualty.
Georgia Casualty is currently rated B++ (Very Good)
by A.M. Best.
Bankers Fidelity.
Bankers Fidelity is currently rated B++ (Very Good)
by A.M. Best.
Since 1999, Atlantic American had been
voluntarily rated by Standard and Poors Rating Services
(S&P). In the initial review, the Company was
assigned a single A- counterparty credit and
financial strength rating. On March 14, 2001, the
Companys rating was lowered to a BBB+. On
February 11, 2003, S&P placed the Companys BBB+
counterparty credit and financial strength rating on CreditWatch
with negative implications pending a review of the capital
allocation and the support of the individual companies in the
group. On April 4, 2003, S&P lowered its counterparty
credit and financial strength ratings for Bankers Fidelity,
American Southern, and Association Casualty to BBB
from BBB+ and for Georgia Casualty to
BBB- from BBB+ and removed them from
CreditWatch. These rating actions did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations. On May 15, 2003, S&P affirmed its
counterparty credit and financial strength ratings and then, at
the Companys request, withdrew the ratings. While ratings
are important in the insurance industry, management believes
that Bests Insurance Reports is a more closely followed
rating service within the insurance industry.
Regulation
In common with all domestic insurance companies,
the Companys insurance subsidiaries are subject to
regulation and supervision in the jurisdictions in which they do
business. Statutes typically delegate regulatory, supervisory,
and administrative powers to state insurance commissioners. The
method of such regulation varies, but regulation relates
generally to the licensing of insurers and their agents, the
nature of and limitations on investments, approval of policy
forms, reserve requirements, the standards of solvency to be met
and maintained, deposits of securities for the benefit of
policyholders, and periodic examinations of insurers and trade
practices, among other things. The Companys products
generally are subject to rate regulation by state insurance
commissions, which require that certain minimum loss ratios be
maintained. Certain states also have insurance holding company
laws which require registration and periodic reporting by
insurance companies controlled by other corporations licensed to
transact business within their respective jurisdictions. The
Companys insurance subsidiaries are subject to such
legislation and are registered as controlled insurers in those
jurisdictions in which such registration is required. Such laws
vary from state to state, but typically require periodic
disclosure concerning the corporation which controls the
registered insurers and all subsidiaries of such corporations,
as well as prior notice to, or approval by, the state insurance
commissioners of intercorporate transfers of assets (including
payments of dividends in excess of specified amounts by the
insurance subsidiaries) within the holding company system.
13
Most states require that rate schedules and other
information be filed with the states insurance regulatory
authority, either directly or through a rating organization with
which the insurer is affiliated. The regulatory authority may
disapprove a rate filing if it determines that the rates are
inadequate, excessive, or discriminatory. The Company has
historically experienced no significant regulatory resistance to
its applications for rate increases.
A state may require that acceptable securities be
deposited for the protection either of policyholders located in
those states or of all policyholders. As of December 31,
2003, securities with an amortized cost of $17.0 million
were on deposit either directly with various state authorities
or with third parties pursuant to various custodial agreements
on behalf of the Companys insurance subsidiaries.
Virtually all of the states in which the
Companys insurance subsidiaries are licensed to transact
business require participation in their respective guaranty
funds designed to cover claims against insolvent insurers.
Insurers authorized to transact business in these jurisdictions
are generally subject to assessments of up to 4% of annual
direct premiums written in that jurisdiction to pay such claims,
if any. The occurrence and amount of such assessments has
increased significantly in recent years. The likelihood and
amount of any future assessments cannot be estimated until an
insolvency has occurred. For 2003, 2002, and 2001 the amounts
expensed by the Company were $0.5 million,
$0.4 million, and $0.3 million, respectively.
Workers compensation insurance carriers
authorized to transact business in certain states are required
to participate in second injury trust funds of those states. A
second injury fund is a state-mandated monetary reserve designed
to remove financial disincentives from employment of individuals
with disabilities. Without a second injury fund, the employer or
insurer might be required to absorb full indemnity and/or
medical and rehabilitation costs if a worker suffered increased
disability from a work-related injury because of a pre-existing
condition. Second injury funds are used to reimburse indemnity
and medical costs to employer/ insurers on accepted, qualified
second injury cases. In recent years the Company has experienced
significant increases in second injury trust fund assessments.
For 2003, 2002, and 2001 the amounts expensed by the Company
were $1.8 million, $1.8 million, $0.6 million,
respectively.
NAIC Ratios
The National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (the NAIC) was established to, among
other things, provide guidelines to assess the financial
strength of insurance companies for state regulatory purposes.
The NAIC conducts annual reviews of the financial data of
insurance companies primarily through the application of
13 financial ratios prepared on a statutory basis. The
annual statements are submitted to state insurance departments
to assist them in monitoring insurance companies in their states
and to set forth a desirable range in which companies should
fall in each such ratio.
The NAIC suggests that insurance companies which
fall outside of the usual range in four or more
financial ratios are those most likely to require analysis by
state regulators. However, according to the NAIC, it may not be
unusual for a financially sound company to have several ratios
outside the usual range, and in normal years the
NAIC expects 15% of the companies it tests to be outside the
usual range in four or more categories.
For the year ended December 31, 2003,
Bankers Fidelity and American Southern were within the NAIC
usual range for all 13 financial ratios.
Association Casualty was outside the usual range on
three ratios: the two year overall operating ratio,
the investment yield, and the two year reserve development
to policyholders surplus. The two year overall
operating ratio and the two year reserve development to
policyholders surplus were outside the usual
range primarily due to adverse development on prior year losses.
The investment yield ratio variance resulted from declining
interest yields in Association Casualtys bond portfolio.
Georgia Casualty was outside the usual range on
two ratios: the two year reserve development to
policyholders surplus and the estimated current reserve
deficiency to policyholders surplus. The two year
reserve development to policyholders surplus estimate and
the current reserve deficiency to policyholders surplus
variances were primarily attributable to adverse development on
prior year losses, specifically accident years 1999 and 2000.
14
Risk-Based Capital
Risk-based capital (RBC) is used by
rating agencies and regulators as an early warning tool to
identify weakly capitalized companies for the purpose of
initiating further regulatory action. The RBC calculation
determines the amount of adjusted capital needed by a company to
avoid regulatory action. Authorized Control Level
Risk-Based Capital (ACL) is calculated, and if
a companys adjusted capital is 200% or lower than ACL, it
is subject to regulatory action. At December 31, 2003, all
of the Companys insurance subsidiaries exceeded the RBC
regulatory levels.
Investments
Investment income represents a significant
portion of the Companys total income. Insurance company
investments are subject to state insurance laws and regulations
which limit the concentration and types of investments. The
following table provides information on the Companys
investments as of the dates indicated.
15
Results of the investment portfolio for periods
shown were as follows:
Managements investment strategy is an
increased investment in short and medium maturity bonds and
common and preferred stocks.
Employees
The Company and its subsidiaries employed 254
people at December 31, 2003.
Financial Information By Industry
Segment
The Companys primary insurance subsidiaries
operate with relative autonomy and each company is evaluated
based on its individual performance. American Southern,
Association Casualty, and Georgia Casualty operate in the
Property and Casualty insurance market, while Bankers Fidelity
operates in the Life and Health insurance market. All segments
derive revenue from the collection of premiums, as well as from
investment income. Substantially all revenue other than that in
the corporate and other segment is from external sources. (See
Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Available Information
The Company files annual reports on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). The public can read and obtain copies of those
materials by visiting the SECs Public Reference Room at
450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a
website that contains reports, proxy and information statements
and other information regarding issuers like Atlantic American
that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the
SECs web site is http://www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon
as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or
furnished to the SEC by the Company, the Company makes copies
available to the public, free of charge, on or through its web
site at http://www.atlam.com.
16
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The table below and the information following the
table set forth, for each executive officer of the Company as of
March 1, 2004, his name, age, positions with the Company
and business experience for the past five years, as well as any
prior service with the Company (based upon information supplied
by each of them).
Officers are elected annually and serve at the
discretion of the Board of Directors.
Mr. Robinson
has served as a Director and Chairman
of the Board since 1974 and served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company from September 1988 to May
1995. In addition, Mr. Robinson is a Director of Bull Run
Corporation and Gray Television, Inc.
Mr. Howell
has
been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since
May 1995, and prior thereto served as Executive Vice President
of the Company from October 1992 to May 1995. He has been a
Director of the Company since October 1992. Mr. Howell is
the son-in-law of Mr. Robinson. He is also a Director of
Bull Run Corporation and Gray Television, Inc.
Mr. Sample
has
served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company since July 2002. He also serves in the following
capacities at subsidiaries of the Company: Director of Georgia
Casualty, Director of Association Casualty, and Director of
Bankers Fidelity. Prior to joining the Company in July 2002, he
was a partner of Arthur Andersen LLP since 1990.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain of the statements and subject matters
contained herein that are not based upon historical or current
facts deal with or may be impacted by potential future
circumstances and developments, and should be considered
forward-looking and subject to various risks and uncertainties.
Such forward-looking statements are made based upon
managements belief, as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to management pursuant to
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements, and the
discussion of such subject areas, involve, and therefore are
qualified by, the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding
future expectations generally, and may materially differ from
the Companys actual future experience and results
involving any one or more of such subject areas. The Company has
attempted to identify, in context, certain of the factors that
it currently believes may cause actual future experience and
results to differ from current expectations. The Companys
operations and results also may be subject to the effect of
other risks and uncertainties in addition to the relevant
qualifying factors identified elsewhere herein, including, but
not limited to, locality and seasonality in the industries to
which the Company offers its products, the impact of competitive
products and pricing, unanticipated increases in the rate and
number of claims outstanding, volatility in the capital markets
that may have an impact on the Companys investment
portfolio, the uncertainty of general economic conditions, and
other risks and uncertainties identified from time to time in
the Companys periodic reports filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Many of such factors are beyond the
Companys ability to control or predict. As a result, the
Companys actual financial condition, results of operations
and stock price could differ materially from those expressed in
any forward-looking statements made by the Company. Undue
reliance should not be placed upon forward-looking statements
contained herein. The Company does not intend to publicly update
any forward-looking statements that may be made from time to
time by, or on behalf of, the Company.
17
Casualty Operations
Workers Compensation Insurance
policies provide indemnity and medical
benefits to insured workers for injuries sustained in the course
of their employment.
Business Automobile Insurance
policies provide for bodily injury
and/or property damage liability coverage, uninsured motorists
coverage and physical damage coverage to commercial accounts.
General Liability Insurance
policies cover bodily injury and
property damage liability for both premises and completed
operations exposures for general classes of business.
Property Insurance
policies provide for payment of losses
on real and personal property caused by fire or other multiple
perils.
Personal Automobile Insurance
policies provide for bodily injury
and/or property damage liability coverage, uninsured motorists
coverage and physical damage coverage to individuals.
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
17,947
$
22,748
$
23,677
$
22,795
$
24,573
9,451
9,829
8,732
7,397
6,112
5,777
3,647
3,161
3,536
4,302
3,819
3,627
3,386
3,383
3,118
364
63
67
61
61
$
37,358
$
39,914
$
39,023
$
37,172
$
38,166
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
11,071
$
10,592
$
10,744
$
16,741
$
13,157
8,767
7,388
5,412
4,918
2,876
2,272
1,761
2,610
2,531
1,251
12,209
10,003
6,813
4,386
2,119
$
34,319
$
29,744
$
25,579
$
28,576
$
19,403
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999(1)
(In thousands)
$
13,196
$
18,950
$
22,784
$
19,051
$
8,158
2,307
1,811
671
64
385
221
117
5
4,464
3,080
1,001
81
182
1,138
909
340
$
20,352
$
24,244
$
25,711
$
20,110
$
8,498
(1)
Includes results for the period July 1, 1999
through December 31, 1999.
Life and Health Operations
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
13,541
$
15,421
$
14,096
$
13,445
$
12,499
46,190
42,298
38,268
31,295
25,822
2,952
2,878
2,912
2,899
3,206
49,142
45,176
41,180
34,194
29,028
$
62,683
$
60,597
$
55,276
$
47,639
$
41,527
Table of Contents
Casualty Operations
Life and Health Operations
Table of Contents
Casualty Operations
Life and Health Operations
Table of Contents
Casualty Operations
Life and Health Operations
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(In thousands)
$
148,691
$
143,515
$
133,220
(39,380
)
(47,729
)
(38,851
)
109,311
95,786
94,369
98,536
104,724
108,068
139
(57
)
(2,415
)
98,675
104,667
105,653
56,229
52,253
59,506
43,417
38,889
44,730
99,646
91,142
104,236
108,340
109,311
95,786
41,752
39,380
47,729
$
150,092
$
148,691
$
143,515
Casualty Operations
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
(In thousands)
$
139,560
$
139,802
$
135,948
$
126,263
$
120,235
$
81,070
$
81,657
$
79,776
$
74,677
$
35,492
$
32,643
48,628
52,644
48,780
38,957
26,357
25,799
25,925
30,117
5,581
8,655
78,654
78,496
63,496
43,749
38,756
38,330
42,581
17,972
11,807
93,599
80,824
54,408
48,330
45,073
49,288
21,193
22,842
90,266
61,981
54,840
50,334
53,224
23,112
25,634
66,467
58,891
53,833
56,517
24,635
27,399
61,600
56,534
59,398
26,431
28,842
59,029
61,320
27,783
30,576
63,570
29,412
31,832
31,284
33,459
35,326
139,560
139,802
135,948
126,263
120,235
81,070
81,657
79,776
74,677
35,492
32,643
143,771
136,606
130,415
115,019
80,174
75,243
76,269
79,620
30,813
36,895
143,901
136,425
117,289
81,023
73,037
70,734
76,712
37,604
31,856
140,039
122,099
83,149
75,199
68,816
73,383
37,974
40,117
125,006
83,033
76,758
70,932
72,944
35,960
41,163
83,182
76,832
72,430
74,695
37,986
39,835
76,886
72,243
76,275
41,071
41,841
72,401
75,986
41,868
44,954
76,323
41,447
45,840
42,206
45,384
46,238
$
(3,969
)
$
(7,953
)
$
(13,776
)
$
(4,771
)
$
(2,112
)
$
4,771
$
7,375
$
(1,646
)
$
(6,714
)
$
(13,595
)
-2.8
%
-5.9
%
-10.9
%
-4.0
%
-2.6
%
5.8
%
9.2
%
-2.2
%
-18.9
%
-41.6
%
Table of Contents
Life and Health Operations
Casualty Operations
Life and Health Operations
Table of Contents
Casualty Operations
Life and Health Operations
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003
2002
2001
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
$
121,521
39.1
%
$
120,348
44.2
%
$
81,440
34.2
%
1,446
0.5
3,064
1.1
4,317
1.8
7,309
2.3
8,074
3.0
4,229
1.8
NIL
NIL
NIL
73,868
23.8
49,038
18.0
42,124
17.7
24,205
7.8
25,180
9.3
30,311
12.7
1,100
0.3
1,306
0.5
1,360
0.6
229,449
73.8
207,010
76.1
163,781
68.8
44,000
14.2
32,062
11.8
24,317
10.2
5,564
1.8
5,739
2.1
6,134
2.6
4,639
1.5
5,031
1.9
4,854
2.0
NIL
NIL
46
NIL
1,238
0.4
542
0.2
NIL
25,819
8.3
21,487
7.9
39,151
16.4
$
310,709
100.0
%
$
271,871
100.0
%
$
238,283
100.0
%
(1)
Fixed maturities are carried on the balance sheet
at market value. Total cost of fixed maturities was
$223.2 million as of December 31, 2003,
$200.7 million as of December 31, 2002, and
$158.5 million as of December 31, 2001.
(2)
Equity securities are valued at market. Total
cost of equity securities was $21.7 million as of
December 31, 2003, $17.1 million as of
December 31, 2002, and $15.4 million as of
December 31, 2001.
(3)
Mortgage, policy and student loans are valued at
historical cost.
(4)
Investments in other invested assets which are
traded are valued at estimated market value and those in which
the Company has significant influence are accounted for using
the equity method. Total cost
Table of Contents
of other invested assets was $4.6 million as
of December 31, 2003, $5.3 million as of
December 31, 2002 and $5.1 million as of
December 31, 2001.
(5)
Short-term investments are valued at cost, which
approximates market value.
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
283,873
$
246,704
$
227,922
15,359
13,793
14,141
5.41
%
5.59
%
6.20
%
360
587
1,708
(1)
Calculated as the average of the balances at the
beginning of the year and at the end of each of the succeeding
four quarters.
Table of Contents
Director or
Name
Age
Position with the Company
Officer Since
80
Chairman of the Board
1974
41
Director, President & CEO
1992
47
Senior Vice President & CFO
2002
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Properties |
Leased Properties. The Company leases space for its principal offices and for some of its insurance operations in an office building located in Atlanta, Georgia, from Delta Life Insurance Company under leases which expire at various times from July 31, 2005 to May 31, 2012. Under the current terms of the leases, the Company occupies approximately 65,489 square feet of office space. Delta Life Insurance Company, the owner of the building, is controlled by J. Mack Robinson, Chairman of the Board of Directors and the largest shareholder of the Company. The terms of the leases are believed by Company management to be comparable to terms which could be obtained by the Company from unrelated parties for comparable rental property.
American Southern leases space for its office in a building located in Atlanta, Georgia. The lease term expires January 31, 2010. Under the terms of the lease, American Southern occupies approximately 17,014 square feet.
Association Casualty leases space for its office in a building located in Austin, Texas. The lease term expires December 31, 2005. Under the terms of the lease, Association Casualty occupies 18,913 square feet.
Self Insurance Administrators, Inc. (SIA), a non-insurance subsidiary of the Company, leases space for its office in a building located in Stone Mountain, Georgia. The lease term expires December 31, 2004. Under the terms of the lease, SIA occupies 1,787 square feet.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to and in the ordinary course of their businesses. In the opinion of management, such claims will not have a material effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the Companys shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.
18
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Companys common stock is quoted on the
Nasdaq National Market (Symbol: AAME). As of March 19,
2004, there were 4,739 shareholders of record. The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high
and low sale prices of the Companys common stock as
reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
Year Ended December 31,
High
Low
$
1.84
$
0.95
2.90
1.17
2.75
2.16
3.32
2.30
$
2.67
$
1.60
2.73
1.87
2.46
1.62
2.35
1.25
The Company has not paid dividends to its common
shareholders since the fourth quarter of 1988. Payment of
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the
Companys Board of Directors and will depend upon the
financial condition, capital requirements, and earnings of the
Company as well as other factors as the Board of Directors may
deem relevant. The Companys primary sources of cash for
the payment of dividends are dividends from its subsidiaries.
Under the insurance code of the state of jurisdiction under
which each insurance subsidiary operates, dividend payments to
the Company by its insurance subsidiaries without the prior
approval of the Insurance Commissioner of the applicable state,
are limited to the greater of 10% of accumulated statutory
earnings or statutory net income before recognizing realized
investment gains. The Companys principal insurance
subsidiaries had the following accumulated statutory earnings as
of December 31, 2003: Georgia Casualty
$22.2 million, American Southern
$34.5 million, Association Casualty
$18.2 million, Bankers Fidelity Life
$31.2 million. The Company has elected to retain its
earnings to grow its business and does not anticipate paying
cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth, as of
December 31, 2003, the number of securities outstanding
under the Companys equity compensation plans, the weighted
average exercise price of such securities and the number of
securities remaining available for grant under these plans:
Weighted-
Number of securities
average exercise
remaining available for
Number of securities
price of
future issuance under
to be issued upon
outstanding
equity compensation
exercise of
options,
plans (excluding
outstanding options,
warrants and
securities reflected in
Plan Category
warrants and rights
rights
the first column)
1,015,500
$
1.82
2,452,150
(1)
(1)
(1)
1,015,500
$
1.82
2,452,150
(1) | All the Companys equity compensation plans have been approved by the Companys shareholders. |
19
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance premiums
|
$ | 154,712 | $ | 154,499 | $ | 145,589 | $ | 133,497 | $ | 107,594 | |||||||||||||
Investment income
|
15,628 | 14,011 | 14,317 | 15,552 | 12,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
900 | 1,148 | 1,694 | 1,287 | 1,172 | ||||||||||||||||||
Realized investment gains, net
|
360 | 587 | 1,708 | 1,922 | 2,831 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
171,600 | 170,245 | 163,308 | 152,258 | 124,321 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Insurance benefits and losses incurred
|
102,343 | 109,109 | 106,896 | 97,628 | 78,162 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses
|
62,732 | 58,033 | 52,159 | 49,874 | 42,237 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses
|
165,075 | 167,142 | 159,055 | 147,502 | 120,399 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle
|
6,525 | 3,103 | 4,253 | 4,756 | 3,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
(319 | ) | (498 | ) | 656 | 1,124 | (6,988 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
6,844 | 3,601 | 3,597 | 3,632 | 10,910 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle(1)
|
| (15,816 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 6,844 | $ | (12,215 | ) | $ | 3,597 | $ | 3,632 | $ | 10,910 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
$ | .26 | $ | .10 | $ | .10 | $ | .12 | $ | .48 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle(1)
|
| (.74 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | .26 | $ | (.64 | ) | $ | .10 | $ | .12 | $ | .48 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
$ | .25 | $ | .10 | $ | .10 | $ | .12 | $ | .46 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle(1)
|
| (.73 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | .25 | $ | (.63 | ) | $ | .10 | $ | .12 | $ | .46 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tangible book value per common share(2)
|
$ | 3.30 | $ | 2.79 | $ | 2.49 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 2.14 | |||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding
|
21,199 | 21,374 | 21,246 | 21,157 | 21,027 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 443,552 | $ | 421,524 | $ | 412,019 | $ | 375,777 | $ | 351,144 | |||||||||||||
Total long-term debt
|
$ | 53,238 | $ | 48,042 | $ | 44,000 | $ | 46,500 | $ | 51,000 | |||||||||||||
Total debt
|
$ | 56,238 | $ | 50,042 | $ | 44,000 | $ | 46,500 | $ | 51,000 | |||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
$ | 86,893 | $ | 78,540 | $ | 87,526 | $ | 83,240 | $ | 78,948 |
(1) | Represents a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle with respect to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 regarding goodwill. |
(2) | Excludes goodwill. |
20
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following is managements discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic American Corporation (Atlantic American or the Company) and its subsidiaries for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
Atlantic American is an insurance holding company whose operations are conducted through a group of regional insurance companies: American Southern Insurance Company and American Safety Insurance Company (together known as American Southern); Association Casualty Insurance Company and Association Risk Management General Agency, Inc. (together known as Association Casualty); Georgia Casualty & Surety Company (Georgia Casualty); and Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company (Bankers Fidelity). Each operating company is managed separately based upon the geographic location or the type of products offered; although management is conforming information systems, policies and procedures, products, marketing and other functions between Association Casualty and Georgia Casualty to create a southern regional property and casualty operation.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of Atlantic American and its subsidiaries are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and, in managements belief, conform to general practices within the insurance industry. The following is an explanation of the Companys accounting policies and the resultant estimates considered most significant by management. These accounting policies inherently require significant judgment and assumptions and actual results could differ from managements initial estimates. Atlantic American does not expect that changes in the estimates determined using these policies would have a material effect on the Companys financial condition or liquidity, although changes could have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations.
Unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense comprised 42% of the Company liabilities at December 31, 2003. This obligation includes an estimate for: 1) unpaid losses on claims reported prior to December 31, 2003, 2) future development on those reported claims, 3) unpaid ultimate losses on claims incurred prior to December 31, 2003 but not yet reported to the Company and 4) unpaid claims adjustment expense for reported and unreported claims incurred prior to December 31, 2003. Quantification of loss estimates for each of these components involves a significant degree of judgment and estimates may vary, materially, from period to period. Estimated unpaid losses on reported claims are developed based on historical experience with similar claims by the Company. Future development on reported claims, estimates of unpaid ultimate losses incurred prior to December 31, 2003 but not yet reported to the Company, and estimates of unpaid claims adjustment expense are developed based on the Companys historical experience using actuarial methods to assist in the analysis. The Companys actuarial staff develops ranges of estimated future development on reported and unreported claims as well as loss adjustment expenses using various methods including the paid-loss development method, the reported-loss development method, the paid Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, the reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, the Berquist-Sherman method and a frequency-severity method. Any single method used to estimate ultimate losses has inherent advantages and disadvantages due to the trends and changes affecting the business environment and the Companys administrative policies. Further, a variety of external factors, such as legislative changes, medical inflation, and others may directly or indirectly impact the relative adequacy of liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expense. The Companys approach is the selection of an estimate of ultimate losses based on comparing results of a variety of reserving methods, as opposed to total reliance on any single method. Unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses are generally reviewed quarterly for significant lines of business, and when current results differ from the original assumptions used to develop such estimates, the amount of the Companys recorded liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses is adjusted.
Future policy benefits comprised 13% of the Companys total liabilities at December 31, 2003. These liabilities relate to life insurance products and are based upon assumed future investment yields, mortality
21
Deferred acquisition costs comprised 6% of the Companys total assets at December 31, 2003. Deferred acquisition costs are commissions, premium taxes, and other costs that vary with and are primarily related to the acquisition of new and renewal business and are generally deferred and amortized. The deferred amounts are recorded as an asset on the balance sheet and amortized to income in a systematic manner. Traditional life insurance and long-duration health insurance deferred policy acquisition costs are amortized over the estimated premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used in computing the related liability for policy benefit reserves. The deferred acquisition costs for property and casualty insurance and short-duration health insurance are amortized over the effective period of the related insurance policies. Deferred policy acquisition costs are expensed when such costs are deemed not to be recoverable from future premiums (for traditional life and long-duration health insurance) and from the related unearned premiums and investment income (for property and casualty and short-duration health insurance). Assessments of recoverability for property and casualty and short-duration health insurance are extremely sensitive to the estimates of a subsequent years projected losses related to the unearned premiums. Projected loss estimates for a current block of business for which unearned premiums remain to be earned may vary significantly from the indicated losses incurred in any given calendar year.
Receivables are amounts due from reinsurers, insureds and agents and comprised 19% of the Companys total assets at December 31, 2003. Allowances for uncollectible amounts are established, as and when a loss has been determined probable, against the related receivable. Annually, the Company and/or its reinsurance broker perform an analysis of the credit worthiness of the Companys reinsurers. Failure of reinsurers to meet their obligations due to insolvencies or disputes could result in uncollectible amounts and losses to the Company. Insured and agent balances are evaluated periodically for collectibility. Losses are recognized when determined on a specific account basis and a general provision for loss is made based on the Companys historical experience.
Cash and investments comprised 72% of the Companys total assets at December 31, 2003. Substantially all investments are in bonds and common and preferred stocks, which are subject to significant market fluctuations. The Company carries all investments as available for sale and accordingly at their estimated market values. On occasion, the value of an investment may decline to a value below its amortized purchase price and remain at such value for an extended period of time. When an investments indicated market value has declined below its cost basis for a period of time, generally, not less than nine months, the Company evaluates such investment for other than a temporary impairment. If other than a temporary impairment is deemed to exist, then the Company will write down the amortized cost basis of the investment to a more appropriate value. While such write down does not impact the reported value of the investment in the Companys balance sheet, it is reflected as a realized investment loss in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Deferred income taxes comprised less than 1% of the Companys total liabilities at December 31, 2003. Deferred income taxes reflect the effect of temporary differences between assets and liabilities that are recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts that are recognized for tax purposes. These deferred income taxes are measured by applying currently enacted tax laws and rates. Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realization, management considers estimates of future taxable income and tax planning strategies.
Refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding the Companys significant accounting policies.
22
Overall Corporate Results
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
42,202
$
44,353
$
43,779
22,776
26,619
29,668
37,523
33,093
28,515
102,501
104,065
101,962
68,333
65,276
60,244
766
904
1,102
$
171,600
$
170,245
$
163,308
$
7,847
$
6,621
$
6,796
(612
)
(1,981
)
(2,925
)
1,115
(178
)
2,106
8,350
4,462
5,977
5,269
4,065
3,370
(7,094
)
(5,424
)
(5,094
)
$
6,525
$
3,103
$
4,253
On a consolidated basis, the Company had net income for 2003 of $6.8 million, or $.25 per diluted share. In 2002, the Company had a net loss of $12.2 million, or $.63 per diluted share. Net income was $3.6 million, or $.10 per diluted share in 2001. The net loss for 2002 was primarily the result of a non-cash charge of $15.8 million to reflect a change in accounting for goodwill. Total revenue for 2003 increased slightly to $171.6 million from $170.2 million in 2002. The moderate increase in revenue during 2003 is primarily attributable to the non-renewal of several accounts that were unprofitable in addition to the loss of one of the Companys larger contracts early in the second quarter of 2003, offset by continued new business growth and premium increases on existing business. Total revenue for 2002 increased $6.9 million, or 4.2%, to $170.2 million from $163.3 million in 2001. The increase in revenue during 2002 was primarily due to significant premium rate increases at both Georgia Casualty and Bankers Fidelity on new and renewal business. During 2003, net income was favorably impacted by a $1.5 million deferred tax benefit related to a reduction of the Companys valuation allowance compared to a similar $1.3 million and $0.8 million deferred tax benefit in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The reduction of the valuation allowance was the result of reassessment as to the realization of certain net operating loss carry forwards. Also, during 2003, the Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $1.0 million related to prior years alternative minimum tax payments, which did not occur in 2002 or 2001. At the time such payments were made there was no assurance that such amounts could be recovered in future periods. After filing the Companys 2002 tax returns in 2003 and assessing the current status of the life insurance versus non-life insurance subsidiaries, the Company determined that the realization of future benefit from prior years alternative minimum tax payments was probable and, accordingly, the benefit was recognized. Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle increased 110.3% to
23
The Companys casualty operations, referred to as the Casualty Division, are comprised of American Southern, Association Casualty, and Georgia Casualty. The Companys life and health operations, referred to as the Life and Health Division, are comprised of the operations of Bankers Fidelity.
A more detailed analysis of the individual
operating entities and other corporate activities is provided in
the following discussion.
Underwriting Results
American
Southern
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, American Southerns premiums, losses and
underwriting ratios:
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
44,393
$
48,713
$
45,490
(6,435
)
(6,878
)
(5,931
)
$
37,958
$
41,835
$
39,559
$
37,358
$
39,914
$
39,023
20,977
26,353
26,069
13,378
11,379
10,914
$
3,003
$
2,182
$
2,040
56.2
%
66.0
%
66.8
%
35.8
28.5
28.0
92.0
%
94.5
%
94.8
%
Gross written premiums at American Southern decreased $4.3 million, or 8.9%, during 2003. The decrease in premiums was attributable to the loss of American Southerns largest account upon its contractual termination on April 30, 2003 partially offset by new business. The lost contract represented annualized premiums of $14.3 million, or approximately 10% of annualized premium revenue for Atlantic American and even though no individual piece of new business is of the same magnitude as the lost contract, American Southern has substantially replaced the written premium with new contracts from a more diversified group of clients.
Ceded premiums decreased $0.4 million, or 6.4%, during 2003. Although American Southern has experienced an increase in reinsurance rates, the effective percent of premiums ceded to premiums earned remained virtually unchanged in 2003 from 2002. Rate increases were offset by a reduction in reinsurance costs attributable to the loss of American Southerns largest account discussed previously. This contract, which terminated on April 30, 2003, had higher reinsurance costs than the other accounts in American Southerns book of business.
Gross written premiums at American Southern increased $3.2 million, or 7.1%, during 2002. The increase in premiums was primarily attributable to significant rate increases, new business generated by established agents including one new state contract that contributed $1.1 million in written premiums as well as premiums provided by new agency appointments. Offsetting these increases in gross written
24
Ceded premiums increased $0.9 million, or 16.0%, during 2002. In 2002, American Southern experienced higher reinsurance rates; however, the increase in reinsurance was also due to several factors other than pricing. As American Southern premiums are determined and ceded as a percentage of earned premiums, an increase in ceded premiums occurs when earned premiums increase. Further, included in 2001 was a state contract that accounted for $2.0 million in written premiums during 2001 for which there was no reinsurance. The contract was not renewed in 2002. Accordingly, in 2002 there was a higher effective percent of premiums ceded to premiums written than in 2001.
American Southern produces much of its business through contracts with various states and municipalities, some of which represent significant amounts of revenue. These contracts, which last from one to three years, are periodically subject to competitive renewal quotes and the loss of a significant contract could have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of American Southern and the Company. In an effort to increase the number of programs underwritten by American Southern and to insulate it from the loss of any one program, American Southern is continually evaluating new underwriting programs. There can be no assurance, however, that new programs or new accounts will offset lost business.
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, American Southerns earned premiums by line of
business:
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
17,947
$
22,748
$
23,677
9,451
9,829
8,732
5,777
3,647
3,161
3,819
3,627
3,386
364
63
67
$
37,358
$
39,914
$
39,023
Net earned premiums for 2003 decreased $2.6 million, or 6.4%, from 2002 primarily due to the loss of American Southerns largest contract, which has been previously discussed, partially offset by the new more diversified business written in 2003.
Net earned premiums for 2002 increased $0.9 million, or 2.3%, over 2001 also primarily due to the factors discussed previously.
The performance of an insurance company is often measured by the combined ratio. The combined ratio represents the percentage of losses, loss adjustment expenses and other expenses that are incurred for each dollar of premium earned by the company. A combined ratio of under 100% represents an underwriting profit while a combined ratio of over 100% indicates an underwriting loss. The combined ratio is divided into two components, the loss ratio (the ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred to premiums earned) and the expense ratio (the ratio of expenses incurred to premiums earned).
The combined ratio for American Southern decreased from 94.5% in 2002 to a combined ratio of 92.0% in 2003. The loss ratio decreased to 56.2% in 2003 from 66.0% in 2002. The decrease in the loss ratio during 2003 was primarily attributable to the loss of American Southerns largest account, which expired on April 30, 2003. American Southerns loss ratio in 2003 improved significantly as it benefited from a substantial reduction in automobile claims related to this account. The expense ratio for 2003 increased to 35.8% from 28.5% in 2002. The increase in the expense ratio in 2003 is a function of American Southerns contractual arrangements, which compensate the companys agents in relation to the
25
The combined ratio for American Southern
decreased from 94.8% in 2001 to a combined ratio of 94.5% in
2002. The loss ratio decreased to 66.0% in 2002 from 66.8% in
2001. During 2001, American Southern released approximately
$1.4 million of redundant reserves related to certain
program business that favorably impacted the loss ratio for
2001. Excluding the impact of the reserve redundancy recognized
in 2001, the loss ratio in 2002 improved significantly over 2001
primarily due to lower than anticipated losses on the personal
and commercial automobile lines of business. The expense ratio
for 2002 increased slightly to 28.5% from 28.0% in 2001. The
increase in the expense ratio in 2002 was a direct result of
American Southerns business structure discussed previously.
Association
Casualty
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, Association Casualtys premiums, losses and
underwriting ratios:
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
26,853
$
26,786
$
34,648
(4,584
)
(4,166
)
(3,692
)
$
22,269
$
22,620
$
30,956
$
20,352
$
24,244
$
25,711
15,245
20,402
23,613
8,143
8,198
8,155
(1)
$
(3,036
)
$
(4,356
)
$
(6,057
)
74.9
%
84.2
%
91.8
%
40.0
33.8
31.7
(1)
114.9
%
118.0
%
123.5
%
(1) | Excludes the interest expense on an intercompany surplus note associated with the acquisition of Association Casualty. |
Gross written premiums at Association Casualty increased $0.1 million in 2003. The slight increase in gross written premiums was primarily attributable to the continued rationalization of certain business along with implementation of certain minimum account standards. During 2003, approximately $3.9 million in gross written premiums were non-renewed as a result of these initiatives. Association Casualty continues to re-underwrite the workers compensation book of business, increase rates on renewal business, and increase business writings for commercial lines other than workers compensation such as general liability, property and automobile.
Ceded premiums at Association Casualty increased $0.4 million, or 10.0%, during 2003. In 2003, Association Casualtys primary reinsurance agreement expired. Due to the proposed renewal rates and terms associated therewith, Association Casualty terminated the relationship with its existing reinsurer and entered into a new reinsurance agreement. The new reinsurance rates will result in a prospective pricing
26
Gross written premiums at Association Casualty decreased $7.9 million, or 22.7%, during 2002 as compared to 2001. The primary reasons for this decline were as follows: a cessation of writing accident and health policies in the first quarter of 2002 resulting in a $1.0 million decline in 2002 as compared to 2001; a $3.0 million decline in 2002 as a result of the companys change late in 2000 and throughout 2001 in recognizing written premiums on an annualized basis instead of the installment method and; an extensive re-underwriting of the workers compensation book of business, which even after significant rate increases resulted in a decline in 2002 premiums. Association Casualty increased rates on renewal business by approximately 17% in 2002.
Ceded premiums at Association Casualty increased $0.5 million, or 12.8%, during 2002. As Association Casualty continued its diversification into commercial lines other than workers compensation, ceded premiums increased significantly due to the higher reinsurance costs associated with these new lines of business.
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, Association Casualtys earned premiums by line
of business:
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
13,196
$
18,950
$
22,784
2,307
1,811
671
385
221
117
4,464
3,080
1,001
182
1,138
$
20,352
$
24,244
$
25,711
Net earned premiums decreased $3.9 million, or 16.1%, during 2003 and $1.5 million, or 5.7%, during 2002 primarily due to the reasons discussed previously.
The combined ratio for Association Casualty decreased from 118.0% in 2002 to 114.9% in 2003. The loss ratio decreased from 84.2% in 2002 to 74.9% in 2003. The decrease in the loss ratio was primarily attributable to an extensive re-underwriting of the workers compensation book of business that began in 2002. Although Association Casualty is benefiting from these initiatives, it continues to be adversely impacted by the liberal interpretation of the workers compensation laws in the state of Texas. As the law has evolved, interpretive changes in the application of life time medical and impairment rating provisions have resulted in increased medical costs and the need to provide for additional reserves. Association Casualty continues to increase pricing and improve underwriting criteria to help to mitigate these costs, as well as others. The expense ratio increased to 40.0% in 2003 from 33.8% in 2002, primarily as a result of a consistent level of fixed expenses coupled with a decrease in earned premiums.
The combined ratio for Association Casualty decreased from 123.5% in 2001 to 118.0% in 2002. The loss ratio decreased from 91.8% in 2001 to 84.2% in 2002. The decrease in the loss ratio was primarily attributable to significant premium rate increases in addition to benefits from non-renewing its unprofitable workers compensation business as discussed previously. The expense ratio increased to 33.8% in 2002 from 31.7% in 2001, primarily as a result of the change in the book of business and the decline in earned premiums.
27
Georgia
Casualty
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, Georgia Casualtys premiums, losses and
underwriting ratios:
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
51,753
$
52,406
$
40,966
(14,481
)
(17,889
)
(15,702
)
$
37,272
$
34,517
$
25,264
$
34,319
$
29,744
$
25,579
22,258
19,950
17,644
14,150
13,321
8,765
$
(2,089
)
$
(3,527
)
$
(830
)
64.9
%
67.1
%
69.0
%
41.2
44.8
34.3
106.1
%
111.9
%
103.3
%
Gross written premiums at Georgia Casualty decreased $0.7 million, or 1.2%, in 2003. The decrease in premiums was primarily attributable to the non-renewal of several large accounts that were previously unprofitable in addition to the complete elimination of a substandard underwriting program, which began during the latter part of 2002. During 2003, approximately $4.3 million in gross written premiums were non-renewed from these initiatives. Through existing agents, Georgia Casualty continues to produce new business and increase rates on renewal business.
Ceded premiums at Georgia Casualty decreased $3.4 million, or 19.1%, in 2003. The decrease in ceded premiums is primarily due to the quota share reinsurance agreement. During 2003, the 30% quota share reinsurance agreement that Georgia Casualty had put into place in the first quarter of 2002 was reduced to a 20% quota share agreement retroactive to January 1, 2003. The reduction in the quota share agreement resulted in a decrease in ceded premiums of approximately $3.6 million in 2003 as compared to 2002 when the cession rate was higher.
Gross written premiums at Georgia Casualty increased $11.4 million, or 27.9%, in 2002. The increase in premiums was primarily attributable to rate increases on renewal business of approximately 16% coupled with new business produced by existing agents. The majority of the growth occurred in the package policies, while the workers compensation line of business experienced a modest growth.
Ceded premiums at Georgia Casualty increased $2.2 million, or 13.9%, in 2002. The increase in ceded premiums was primarily due to an overall increase in rates charged to reinsure the business as well as the growth experienced by the company. Also, the 40% quota share reinsurance agreement that Georgia Casualty incepted in 2001 for premium growth and surplus protection was reduced to a 30% quota share on January 1, 2002. From this initiative, premiums ceded under the quota share agreement decreased $3.4 million during 2002 resulting in a lower effective percent of premium ceded to premium written.
28
The following table summarizes, for the periods
indicated, Georgia Casualtys earned premiums by line of
business:
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
11,071
$
10,592
$
10,744
8,767
7,388
5,412
2,272
1,761
2,610
12,209
10,003
6,813
$
34,319
$
29,744
$
25,579
Net earned premiums increased $4.6 million, or 15.4%, during 2003. The increase in earned premiums was due to several reasons including rate increases and new business. While the cession for the quota share was reduced from 40% in 2001 to 30% in 2002, the bulk of written premiums ceded under the 40% quota share agreement during 2001 were recognized in 2002, resulting in lower earned premiums in 2002 as compared to 2003 when the cession rate was lower. Additionally, in 2003 net earned premiums at Georgia Casualty increased by $1.8 million due to another reduction in the quota share reinsurance agreement discussed previously.
Net earned premiums increased $4.2 million, or 16.3%, during 2002 primarily due to the factors discussed previously. Partially offsetting the increase in net earned premiums for 2002 was an increase in ceded earned premiums under the quota share agreement. While the cession for the quota share had been reduced from 40% in 2001 to 30% in 2002, the bulk of the written premiums ceded under this agreement during 2001 were recognized in 2002.
The combined ratio for Georgia Casualty decreased from 111.9% in 2002 to 106.1% in 2003. The loss ratio decreased from 67.1% in 2002 to 64.9% in 2003. The decrease in the loss ratio was primarily attributable to better experience on Georgia Casualtys net book of business during 2003 than in 2002. During 2002, Georgia Casualty incurred several large losses. The expense ratio decreased in 2003 to 41.2% from 44.8% in 2002. The decrease in the expense ratio was primarily due to the reversal of the companys accrued 2002 policyholder dividend payment of $0.4 million due to substandard results for workers compensation business in the states of Florida and Georgia during 2003. In 2003 and 2002, Georgia Casualty accrued and expensed $0 and $0.5 million, respectively, for policyholder dividends. The reduction of the 2002 policyholder dividend accrual in 2003 decreased expenses by $0.9 million during 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002.
The combined ratio for Georgia Casualty increased to 111.9% in 2002 from 103.3% in 2001. The loss ratio decreased slightly from 69.0% in 2001 to 67.1% in 2002. The decrease in the loss ratio was attributable to rate increases and continued focus on disciplined underwriting. The expense ratio increased to 44.8% in 2002 from 34.3% in 2001 primarily due to an overall increase in operating expenses resulting from significant business growth in addition to state assessments, specifically second injury trust fund and insolvency assessments. In 2002 the company expensed $2.2 million for such assessments compared to $0.9 million in 2001.
29
Bankers Fidelity |
The following summarizes, for the periods indicated, Bankers Fidelitys premiums and operating expenses:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Medicare Supplement
|
$ | 46,190 | $ | 42,298 | $ | 38,268 | ||||||
Other health products
|
2,952 | 2,878 | 2,912 | |||||||||
Life insurance
|
13,541 | 15,421 | 14,096 | |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total earned premium
|
$ | 62,683 | $ | 60,597 | $ | 55,276 | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Insurance benefits and losses
|
$ | 43,863 | $ | 42,404 | $ | 39,570 | ||||||
Underwriting expenses
|
19,201 | 18,807 | 17,304 | |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total expenses
|
$ | 63,064 | $ | 61,211 | $ | 56,874 | ||||||
|
|
|
Premium revenue at Bankers Fidelity increased $2.1 million, or 3.4%, during 2003. The Medicare Supplement line of business increased $3.9 million, or 9.2%, and accounts for 74% of total earned premiums. Bankers Fidelity continues its market expansion throughout the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic, and in the western United States. In 2003, the companys key states in terms of premium revenue were Georgia, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Utah and West Virginia, which accounted for approximately 60% of total earned premium for 2003. The Medicare Supplement line of business in these states increased approximately $1.5 million in 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002. During 2003, rate increases were implemented in varying amounts by state and plan. Rate increases that were implemented in 2002 resulted in increased revenue and profitability in 2003. During the same time, the life insurance line of business decreased $1.9 million, or 12.2%. During 2002, Bankers Fidelity contracted varying amounts of whole life insurance to certain former Cub Food workers for a single life premium of $1.2 million, which did not occur in 2003. The lack of such a significant contract in 2003 as well as a decline in qualified leads resulted in a lower level of life insurance premiums in 2003 than in 2002.
Premium revenue at Bankers Fidelity increased $5.3 million, or 9.6%, during 2002. The most significant increase in premium was in the Medicare Supplement line of business, which increased $4.0 million, or 10.5%. During 2002, Bankers Fidelity generated additional Medicare Supplement premium revenue in the state of Pennsylvania of approximately $1.7 million. In addition, in both 2002 and 2001, rate increases were implemented in varying amounts by state and type of plan. Significant rate increases in 2001 resulted in increased revenue and profitability in 2002, thereby requiring smaller rate increases in 2002 than those experienced in 2001. Additionally, the life insurance line of business increased $1.3 million, or 9.4%, primarily due to $1.2 million in single premium life sales.
The increase in both benefits and losses and underwriting expenses during 2003 and 2002 was primarily attributable to the increase in premiums for those periods. As a percentage of premiums, benefits and losses were 70.0% in 2003 compared to 70.0% in 2002 and 71.6% in 2001. The increase in the loss ratio in 2001 was primarily due to continued aging of the life business and higher medical costs than expected for the health business. Rate increases implemented by the company on the Medicare Supplement line of business have helped to mitigate the impact of higher medical costs.
Bankers Fidelity has been reasonably successful in controlling operating costs, while continuing to add new business. As a percentage of premiums, commissions and underwriting expenses were 30.6% in 2003 compared to 31.0% in 2002 and 31.3% in 2001.
Investment Income and Realized Gains
Investment income for 2003 of $15.6 million increased $1.6 million, or 11.5%, from 2002. The increase in investment income during 2003 was primarily due to a shift from short-term investments to
30
Realized investment gains were $0.4 million in 2003, $0.6 million in 2002, and $1.7 million in 2001. During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded impairments of $1.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to a common stock investment and $0.2 million and $0, respectively, related to an other invested asset. There were no impairments recorded for the year ended December 31, 2001. While the impairments did not impact the carrying value of the investments, they resulted in realized losses of $1.2 million in 2003 and $0.2 million in 2002. Management continually evaluates the Companys investment portfolio and when opportunities arise will divest investments.
Investment income for 2002 of $14.0 million decreased $0.3 million, or 2.1%, from 2001. The decrease in investment income during 2002 was primarily attributable to decreased interest rates. During both years, the decline in interest rates resulted in several of the Companys higher yielding callable fixed income securities being redeemed by the issuers prior to maturity. The proceeds received from the early redemptions of these fixed income securities were reinvested at a lower yield, and as a result, investment income decreased during 2002. In addition, the Companys equity investment in its joint venture with AAA Carolinas was reduced by $0.4 million in 2002 to reflect lower than expected premium production and higher expenses compared to a decrease of $0.2 million in the equity investment during 2001.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $0.6 million, or 21.8%, during 2003 to $3.1 million from $2.6 million in 2002. As of December 31, 2003, total debt increased $6.2 million to $56.2 million, from $50.0 million at December 31, 2002. On December 4, 2002, the Company participated in a pooled private placement offering of trust preferred securities. In that offering, the Company issued to a separate newly created Connecticut statutory trust approximately $18.0 million in thirty year junior subordinated debentures, and the trust sold $17.5 million of trust preferred securities to third party investors. Of the $17.0 million in net proceeds, $12.0 million was used to reduce the principal balance on the Companys outstanding term loan to $32.0 million from $44.0 million. On May 15, 2003, the Company participated in a second pooled private placement offering of trust preferred securities. In that offering, the Company issued to a separate newly created Connecticut statutory trust approximately $23.2 million in thirty year junior subordinated debentures, and that trust sold $22.5 million of trust preferred securities to third party investors. Of the $21.8 million in net proceeds, $17.0 million was used to reduce the principal balance on the Companys outstanding term loan to $15.0 million from $32.0 million. Both trust preferred securities issuances, which have a maturity of thirty years from their original date of issuance, have an interest rate equivalent to the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin varying from 4.00% to 4.10% and the portion of the term loan that was repaid with the proceeds from the trust preferred issuances had an interest rate equivalent of LIBOR plus 2.50%. The increase in debt level, along with the increased variable rate paid thereon, results in the increase in interest expense for 2003.
In 2002, interest expense decreased $0.7 million to $2.6 million from $3.2 million in 2001. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a decline in interest rates. The base interest rate during 2002, which is three-month LIBOR, decreased from prevailing three-month LIBOR rates in 2001. The interest rates on the Companys debt generally are variable and tied to LIBOR. Additionally, the Companys average debt levels during 2002 were lower as compared to 2001. The reduction in average debt levels, along with decreasing interest rates, accounts for the decrease in 2002.
Other Expenses
Other expenses (commissions, underwriting expenses, and other expenses) increased $4.1 million, or 7.5%, in 2003. The increase in other expenses during 2003 is attributable to several factors. First, the Company experienced an increase in acquisition costs on new and renewal business at American Southern, which increased $1.9 million over 2002. Of the $1.9 million increase in acquisition costs in 2003, agents profit sharing commissions at American Southern accounted for $0.7 million of the increase due primarily
31
Other expenses increased $6.5 million, or
13.4%, in 2002, primarily due to a significant increase in
acquisition costs related to new business. In addition, the
Company experienced an overall increase in operating expenses,
primarily compensation and state assessments both of which
increased $1.3 million as compared to 2001. Also
contributing to the increase in other expenses was a decrease of
$1.4 million in the ceding commission Georgia Casualty was
receiving from the quota share contract, which was reduced from
a 40% quota share reinsurance agreement to a 30% quota share
reinsurance agreement on January 1, 2002. On a consolidated
basis, as a percentage of earned premiums, other expenses
increased to 35.9% in 2002 from 33.6% in 2001.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The major cash needs of the Company are for the
payment of claims and operating expenses, maintaining adequate
statutory capital and surplus levels, and meeting debt service
requirements. The Companys primary sources of cash are
written premiums, investment income and the sale and maturity of
invested assets. The Company believes that, within each
subsidiary, total invested assets will be sufficient to satisfy
all policy liabilities. Cash flows at the parent company are
derived from dividends, management fees, and tax sharing
payments from the subsidiaries. The cash needs of the parent
company are for the payment of operating expenses, the
acquisition of capital assets and debt service requirements.
Dividend payments to the Company by its insurance
subsidiaries are subject to annual limitations and are
restricted to the greater of 10% of statutory surplus or
statutory earnings before recognizing realized investment gains
of the individual insurance subsidiaries. At December 31,
2003, the Companys insurance subsidiaries had statutory
surplus of $106.1 million.
The Company provides certain administrative,
purchasing and other services for each of its subsidiaries. The
amount charged to and paid by the subsidiaries was
$7.6 million, $6.7 million, and $5.9 million in
2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. In addition, the Company has
a formal tax-sharing agreement with each of its insurance
subsidiaries. A net total of $0.9 million,
$2.8 million and $1.3 million was paid to the Company
under the tax sharing agreement in 2003, 2002, and 2001,
respectively. Dividends were paid to Atlantic American by its
subsidiaries totaling $5.7 million in 2003,
$7.1 million in 2002, and $7.1 million in 2001. As a
result of the Companys tax loss carryforwards, which
totaled approximately $17.2 million at December 31,
2003, it is anticipated that the tax sharing agreement will
continue to provide the Company with additional funds with which
to meet its cash flow obligations.
At December 31, 2003, the Companys
$56.2 million of borrowings consisted of $15.0 million
outstanding under a bank loan with Wachovia Bank, N.A.
(Wachovia) and an aggregate of $41.2 million of
outstanding junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures
(Junior Subordinated Debentures). Effective
June 30, 2003, the Company executed an amended and restated
credit agreement (Term Loan) with Wachovia with
respect to the outstanding $15.0 million bank debt. Terms
of the agreement require the Company to repay $2.0 million
in principal on July 1, 2004 and $1.0 million on
December 31, 2004. Beginning in 2005 and each year
thereafter, the Company must repay $0.5 million on
June 30 and $1.3 million on December 31 with one
final payment of $6.8 million at maturity on June 30,
2008. The interest rate on the Term Loan is equivalent to
three-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which was 2.50% at
December 31, 2003. The margin varies based upon the
Companys leverage ratio (debt to total capitalization) and
ranges from 1.75% to 2.50%. The Term Loan requires the Company to
32
The Company intends to pay its obligations under
the Term Loan and the Junior Subordinated Debentures using
dividend and tax sharing payments from its subsidiaries, or from
potential future financing arrangements. In addition, the
Company believes that, if necessary, at maturity, the Term Loan
can be refinanced with the current lender, although there can be
no assurance of the terms or conditions of such a refinancing.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had a
$15.0 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement
with Wachovia that matures on June 30, 2004. The Company
pays a fixed interest rate of 5.1% and receives 3-month LIBOR
until maturity. Due to the significant decrease in LIBOR since
the interest rate swap agreement was incepted in 2001, and
assuming no future change in the LIBOR rate, the Company expects
a reduction in interest expense of approximately
$0.3 million subsequent to the swap maturity at
June 30, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had two
series of preferred stock outstanding, substantially all of
which was held by affiliates of the Companys chairman and
principal shareholders. The outstanding shares of Series B
Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock) have
a stated value of $100 per share; accrue annual dividends
at a rate of $9.00 per share and are cumulative; in certain
circumstances may be convertible into an aggregate of
approximately 3,358,000 shares of common stock; and are
redeemable at the Companys option. The Series B
Preferred Stock is not currently convertible. At
December 31, 2003, the Company had accrued, but unpaid,
dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock totaling
$9.6 million. The shares of Series C Preferred Stock
(Series C Preferred Stock) had a stated value
of $100 per share; accrued annual dividends at a rate of
$9.00 per share and are cumulative. During 2003, in
accordance with the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock,
the Company exercised its right to redeem 20,000 shares of
the outstanding shares of the Series C Preferred Stock.
These shares were redeemed at the redemption price specified in
the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock, $100 per
share, for $2.0 million, bringing the total outstanding
shares of Series C Preferred stock to 5,000 from 25,000 as
of December 31, 2003. The Company paid $0.1 million
and $0.2 million in dividends to the holders of the
Series C Preferred Stock during 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Subsequent to December 31, 2003, the
remaining 5,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock
were redeemed for $100 per share, or $0.5 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled
$13.9 million in 2003, $13.8 million in 2002 and
$15.8 million in 2001. Cash and short-term investments at
December 31, 2003 were $34.2 million and are believed
to be sufficient to meet the Companys near-term needs.
The Company believes that the cash flows it
receives from its subsidiaries and, if needed, additional
borrowings from banks and affiliates of the Company, will enable
the Company to meet its liquidity requirements for the
foreseeable future. Management is not aware of any current
recommendations by
33
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2004, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
No. 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003, which addresses the accounting
and disclosure implications that are expected to arise as a
result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003. Adoption of this statement is not
anticipated to have an impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
In December 2003, the FASB issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 132
(revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits. This statement requires
additional detailed disclosures regarding pension plan assets,
benefit obligations, cash flows, benefit costs and related
information. The Company adopted the new disclosures required as
of December 31, 2003.
Effective December 31, 2003, the Company
adopted the disclosure requirements of Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-01, The Meaning
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments. Disclosures are required for
unrealized losses on fixed maturity and equity securities
classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The
disclosure requirements include quantitative information
regarding the aggregate amount of unrealized losses and the
associated fair value of the investments in an unrealized loss
position, segregated into time periods for which the investments
have been in an unrealized loss position. Certain qualitative
disclosures about the unrealized holdings are also required in
order to provide additional information that the Company
considered in concluding that the unrealized losses were not
other than temporary.
In May 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for
classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial
instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Adoption of this
statement did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations.
In April 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The
statement amended and clarified accounting for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded
in other contracts, and for hedging activities under
SFAS No. 133. The adoption of SFAS No. 149
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
an interpretation of ARB No. 51
(FIN 46), which requires an enterprise to
assess whether consolidation of an entity is appropriate based
upon its interests in a variable interest entity
(VIE). The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
condition or results of operations as there were no material
VIEs identified which required consolidation.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised
version of FIN 46 (FIN 46R), which
incorporated a number of modifications and changes made to
FIN 46. FIN 46R replaces the previously issued
FIN 46 and, subject to certain special provisions, is
effective no later than the end of the first reporting period
that ends after December 15, 2003 for entities considered
to be special-purpose entities. The Company adopted FIN 46R
in the fourth quarter of 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did
not result in the consolidation of any material VIEs but
resulted in the deconsolidation of VIEs that issued Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
(trust preferred securities). The Company is not the
primary beneficiary of the VIEs, which issued the trust
preferred securities. The Company does not own any of the trust
preferred securities, which were issued to unrelated third
parties. These trust preferred securities are considered the
principal variable interests issued by the VIEs. As a result,
the VIEs, which the Company
34
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation
No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees
of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45).
Adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2002, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses
financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with
exit or disposal activities and supercedes EITF Issue
No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)
(Issue 94-3). Adoption of this statement did not
have an impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In April 2002, the FASB issued FASB No. 145,
Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections. Adoption of the provisions of
SFAS No. 145 did not have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards
Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (AcSEC) issued Statement of
Position 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt
Securities (SOP 03-3). SOP 03-3
addresses the accounting for differences between contractual and
expected cash flows to be collected from an investment in loans
or fixed maturity securities acquired in a transfer if those
differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit
quality. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have
material impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In July 2003, AcSEC issued financial Statement of
Position 03-1, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance
Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts
and for Separate Accounts (the SOP). The SOP
addresses a wide variety of topics, many of which are not
applicable to the business which the Company sells. Adoption of
this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In August 2001, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143). This standard
provides the financial accounting and reporting for the cost of
legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long lived assets. In accordance with SFAS 143, asset
retirement obligations will be recorded at fair value in the
period they are incurred if a reasonable estimate can be made.
The adoption of SFAS 143 did not have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial condition or results
of operations.
Impact of Inflation
Insurance premiums are established before the
amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses, or the extent to
which inflation may affect such losses and expenses, are known.
Consequently, the Company attempts, in establishing its
premiums, to anticipate the potential impact of inflation. If,
for competitive reasons premiums cannot be increased to
anticipate inflation, this cost would be absorbed by the
Company. Inflation also affects the rate of investment return on
the Companys investment portfolio with a corresponding
effect on investment income.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2003 the Company did not
have any material off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in
Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
35
Contractual Obligations
The following table discloses the amounts of
payments due under specified contractual obligations, aggregated
by category of contractual obligation, for specified time
periods:
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Payments Due by period
Less than
1-3
3-5
More than
Contractual Obligations
Total
1 Year
Years
Years
5 Years
(In thousands)
$
15,000
$
3,000
$
3,500
$
8,500
$
41,238
41,238
6,918
1,589
2,187
1,519
1,623
$
63,156
$
4,589
$
5,687
$
10,019
$
42,861
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate and Market Risk
Due to the nature of the Companys business it is exposed to both interest rate and market risk. Changes in interest rates, which represent the largest risk factor affecting the Company, may result in changes in the fair value of the Companys investments, cash flows and interest income and expense. To manage this risk, the Company invests in high quality fixed maturities and monitors levels of investments in securities that are directly linked to loans or mortgages.
The Company is also subject to risk from changes in equity prices. Atlantic American owned $20.6 million of common stock of Wachovia Corporation at December 31, 2003. A 10% decrease in the share price of the common stock of Wachovia Corporation would result in a decrease of approximately $1.3 million to shareholders equity.
The interest rate on the Companys debt is tied to LIBOR. During 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Wachovia to hedge its interest rate risk on a portion of its outstanding borrowings. (See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). A 100 basis point increase in the LIBOR would result in an additional $0.4 million in interest expense.
The table below summarizes the estimated fair
values that might result from changes in interest rates of the
Companys fixed maturity portfolio:
+200bp
+100bp
Fair Value
-100bp
-200bp
(Dollars in thousands)
$
198,062
$
212,521
$
229,449
$
247,935
$
269,739
$
192,540
$
204,272
$
207,010
$
217,538
$
223,173
36
The Company is also subject to risk from changes
in equity prices. The table below summarizes the effect that a
change in share price would have on the value of the
Companys equity portfolio, including the Companys
single largest equity holding.
+20%
+10%
Fair Value
-10%
-20%
(Dollars in thousands)
$
24,745
$
22,683
$
20,621
$
18,559
$
16,497
28,055
25,717
23,379
21,041
18,703
$
52,800
$
48,400
$
44,000
$
39,600
$
35,200
$
19,354
$
17,741
$
16,128
$
14,515
$
12,902
19,121
17,527
15,934
14,341
12,747
$
38,475
$
35,268
$
32,062
$
28,856
$
25,649
The interest rate on the Companys debt is
variable and tied to LIBOR. The table below summarizes the
effect that changes in interest rates would have on the
Companys interest expense, prior to the expiration of the
interest rate swap agreements.
Interest Expense
Interest Expense
+200bp
+100bp
Debt
-100bp
-200bp
(Dollars in thousands)
$
800
$
400
$
56,238
$
(400
)
$
(800
)
$
690
$
345
$
50,042
$
(345
)
$
(690
)
Deferred Taxes
At December 31, 2003, the Company had a net deferred tax liability of $0.9 million, comprised of a deferred tax asset of $18.2 million, a deferred tax liability of $16.8 million and a valuation allowance of $2.3 million. The valuation allowance was established against deferred income tax benefits relating primarily to net operating loss carryforwards that may not be realized. Since the Companys ability to generate taxable income from operations and utilize available tax-planning strategies in the near term is dependent upon various factors, many of which are beyond managements control, management believes that the deferred income tax benefits relating to these carryforwards may not be realized. However, realization of the remaining deferred income tax benefits will be assessed periodically based on the Companys current and anticipated results of operations and amounts could increase or decrease in the near term if estimates of future taxable income change. The Company has a formal tax-sharing agreement and files a consolidated income tax return with its subsidiaries.
37
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
|
||||
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
|
||||
Independent Auditors Report
|
39 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
41 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003
|
42 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2003
|
43 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003
|
44 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
45 |
38
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended. Our audit also included the 2003 and 2002 financial
statement schedules listed in the index at Item 15(a).
These financial statements and financial statement schedules are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the 2003 and 2002
financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audits. The financial statements and financial statement
schedules of the Company as of December 31, 2001, and for
the year then ended, before the inclusion of the disclosures
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, were audited by other auditors who have ceased
operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on
those consolidated financial statements and stated that such
2001 financial statement schedules, when considered in relation
to the basic 2001 financial statements taken as a whole, fairly
state, in all material respects the financial data required to
be set forth therein, in their report dated March 25, 2002.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the 2003 and 2002 consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
and subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years
then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
the 2003 and 2002 financial statement schedules, when considered
in relation to the basic 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company changed its method of
accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,
which was adopted by the Company as of
January 1, 2002.
As discussed above, the consolidated financial
statements of
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001 were
audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As
described in Note 1, those consolidated financial
statements have been revised to include pro forma disclosures
required by SFAS No. 142. We audited the transitional
SFAS No. 142 disclosures as described in Note 1.
Our procedures included proving the arithmetic accuracy of
adjusted net income and adjusted net income per common share
(basic and diluted) as included within the pro forma
disclosures. In our opinion, such adjustments and disclosures
are appropriate and have been properly applied. However, we were
not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the
2001 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than
with respect to such adjustments and disclosures and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of
assurance on the 2001 consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
39
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS
To Atlantic American Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
(a
Georgia corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001. These financial statements and the
schedules referred to below are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our
audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Atlantic American
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming
an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
The Schedules I, II, III, IV and VI listed
in Part IV, Item 14 are presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commissions
rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These
schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audit of the basic financial statements, and in our
opinion, fairly state in all material respects the financial
data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
THIS IS A COPY OF THE AUDIT REPORT PREVIOUSLY
ISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP IN CONNECTION WITH ATLANTIC
AMERICAN CORPORATIONS FILING ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001. THIS AUDIT REPORT HAS NOT BEEN
REISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP IN CONNECTION WITH THIS FILING
ON FORM 10-K.
40
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated financial statements.
41
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands, except
per share data)
$
154,712
$
154,499
$
145,589
15,628
14,011
14,317
900
1,148
1,694
360
587
1,708
171,600
170,245
163,308
102,343
109,109
106,896
46,807
44,757
37,317
3,120
2,562
3,234
12,805
10,714
11,608
165,075
167,142
159,055
6,525
3,103
4,253
(319
)
(498
)
656
6,844
3,601
3,597
(15,816
)
6,844
(12,215
)
3,597
(1,349
)
(1,431
)
(1,431
)
$
5,495
$
(13,646
)
$
2,166
$
.26
$
.10
$
.10
(.74
)
$
.26
$
(.64
)
$
.10
$
.25
$
.10
$
.10
(.73
)
$
.25
$
(.63
)
$
.10
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
Retained
Accumulated
Additional
Earnings
Other
Preferred
Common
Paid-In
(Accumulated
Unearned
Comprehensive
Treasury
Stock
Stock
Capital
Deficit)
Compensation
Income
Stock
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
$
159
$
21,412
$
56,997
$
(1,248
)
$
$
6,820
$
(900
)
$
83,240
3,597
3,597
3,498
3,498
(532
)
(532
)
(1,038
)
(1,038
)
5,525
(436
)
(995
)
(1,431
)
45
45
(11
)
(11
)
(257
)
415
158
159
21,412
56,606
1,097
8,748
(496
)
87,526
(12,215
)
(12,215
)
7,144
7,144
(382
)
(382
)
(2,367
)
(2,367
)
(7,820
)
(1,431
)
(1,431
)
41
41
(12
)
(66
)
78
36
36
(44
)
(44
)
(152
)
384
232
159
21,412
55,204
(11,270
)
(30
)
13,143
(78
)
78,540
6,844
6,844
7,453
7,453
470
470
(2,773
)
(2,773
)
11,994
(20
)
(1,980
)
(2,000
)
(1,349
)
(1,349
)
52
52
(1
)
(66
)
67
74
74
(698
)
(698
)
52
(31
)
259
280
$
139
$
21,412
$
51,978
$
(4,457
)
$
(22
)
$
18,293
$
(450
)
$
86,893
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(Dollars in thousands)
$
6,844
$
(12,215
)
$
3,597
15,816
18,478
17,610
16,892
(20,552
)
(18,851
)
(18,175
)
(360
)
(587
)
(1,708
)
9,610
13,447
18,035
126
77
45
1,138
924
1,680
(1,163
)
(621
)
507
5,759
(4,226
)
(12,402
)
(6,076
)
1,926
12,681
111
477
(5,305
)
13,915
13,777
15,847
20,914
7,282
39,122
92,690
54,838
94,098
(136,804
)
(107,371
)
(109,249
)
(425
)
(452
)
(930
)
(128
)
(23,625
)
(45,703
)
22,913
21,824
16,974
750
(2,000
)
(143
)
(225
)
(225
)
25
13
158
(396
)
(44
)
(11
)
(17,000
)
(12,000
)
(2,500
)
2,310
4,718
(1,828
)
(7,400
)
(27,208
)
36,932
41,638
68,846
31,914
$
34,238
$
41,638
$
68,846
$
3,285
$
2,282
$
3,394
$
537
$
113
$
176
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) which, as to insurance companies, differ from
the statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by
regulatory authorities. These financial statements include the
accounts of Atlantic American Corporation (the
Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had five
insurance subsidiaries, including Bankers Fidelity Life
Insurance Company (Bankers Fidelity), American
Southern Insurance Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
American Safety Insurance Company (together known as
American Southern), Association Casualty Insurance
Company and Georgia Casualty & Surety Company
(Georgia Casualty), in addition to two non-insurance
subsidiaries, Association Risk Management General
Agency, Inc., and Self-Insurance Administrators, Inc.
(SIA, Inc.). Association Casualty Insurance
Company and Association Risk Management General
Agency, Inc. are collectively known as Association
Casualty.
Life insurance premiums are recognized as
revenues when due; accident and health premiums are recognized
over the premium paying period and property and casualty
insurance premiums are recognized as revenue ratably over the
contract period. Benefits and expenses are associated with
premiums as they are earned so as to result in recognition of
profits over the lives of the contracts. For traditional life
insurance and long-duration health insurance, this association
is accomplished by the provision of a future policy benefits
reserve and the deferral and subsequent amortization of the
costs of acquiring business, deferred policy acquisition
costs (principally commissions, premium taxes, and other
expenses of issuing policies). Deferred policy acquisition costs
are amortized over the estimated premium-paying period of the
related policies using assumptions consistent with those used in
computing policy benefit reserves. The Company provides for
insurance benefits and losses on accident, health, and casualty
claims based upon estimates of projected ultimate losses. The
deferred policy acquisition costs for property and casualty
insurance and short-duration health insurance are amortized over
the effective period of the related insurance policies. Deferred
policy acquisition costs are expensed when such costs are deemed
not to be recoverable from future premiums (for traditional life
and long-duration health insurance) and from the related
unearned premiums and investment income (for property and
casualty and short-duration health insurance).
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 142
provides guidance on the financial accounting and reporting for
acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002 and
accordingly goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are
no longer amortized but are subject to impairment tests in
accordance with the statement. Intangible assets with finite
lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives, which is
no longer limited to a maximum of forty years. The criteria for
recognizing an intangible asset have also been revised.
SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be tested for
impairment at least annually. The goodwill impairment test
requires goodwill to be allocated to reporting units. The fair
value of the reporting unit is then compared to the carrying
value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit, a
goodwill impairment may exist. The implied fair value of the
goodwill is then compared to the carrying value of the goodwill
and an
45
The Companys investments in both fixed
maturities, which include bonds and redeemable preferred stocks
and equity securities, which include common and non-redeemable
preferred stocks, are classified as
available-for-sale and, accordingly, are carried at
fair market value with the after-tax difference from amortized
cost reflected in stockholders equity as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair market value
for fixed maturities and equity securities are largely
determined by either independent methods prescribed by the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC), which do not differ materially from
nationally quoted market prices or independent broker
quotations. With the exception of short-term securities for
which amortized cost is predominately used to approximate fair
value, security prices are first sought from NAIC pricing
services with the remaining unpriced securities submitted to
brokers for prices. Mortgage loans, policy and student loans,
and real estate are carried at historical cost. Other invested
assets are comprised of investments in limited partnerships,
limited liability companies, and real estate joint ventures;
those which are publicly traded are carried at estimated market
value and others are accounted for using the equity method. If
the value of a common stock, preferred stock, other invested
asset, or publicly traded bond declines below its cost or
amortized cost, and the decline is considered to be other than
temporary, a realized loss is recorded to reduce the carrying
value of the investment to its estimated net realizable value,
which becomes the new cost basis. In evaluating impairment, the
Company considers, among other factors, the expected holding
period, the nature of the investment and the prospects for the
company and its industry. Premiums and discounts related to
investments are amortized or accreted over the life of the
related investment as an adjustment to yield using the effective
interest method. Dividends and interest income are recognized
when earned or declared. The cost of securities sold is based on
specific identification. Unrealized gains (losses) in the value
of invested assets are accounted for as a direct increase
(decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive income in
shareholders equity, net of deferred tax and, accordingly,
have no effect on net income.
Deferred income taxes represent the expected
future tax consequences when the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities are recovered or paid. They arise from differences
between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and
liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax laws and tax
rates as those changes are enacted. The provision for income
taxes represents the total amount of income taxes due related to
the current year, plus the change in deferred taxes during the
year. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on
managements assessment of the relevant facts, it is more
likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will
not be realized.
46
Basic earnings per common share are based on the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each
period. Diluted earnings per common share are based on the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each
period, plus common shares calculated for stock options and
share awards outstanding using the treasury stock method and
assumed conversion of the Series B and C Preferred
Stock, if dilutive. Unless otherwise indicated, earnings per
common share amounts are presented on a diluted basis.
Stock options are reported under the recognition
and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees instead of
the fair value approach recommended in SFAS No. 123
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost
attributable to stock options is reflected in net income, as all
stock options granted have an exercise price equal to the market
value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In
December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends
SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method
of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In
addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent
disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements
about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported
results. If the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee
compensation, the Companys net income (loss) and earnings
(loss) per share would have been as follows:
The resulting pro forma compensation cost may not
be representative of that to be expected in future years.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand
and investments in short-term, highly liquid securities which
have original maturities of three months or less from date of
purchase.
47
In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position No. 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,
which addresses the accounting and disclosure implications that
are expected to arise as a result of the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Adoption
of this statement is not anticipated to have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits. This statement requires additional detailed
disclosures regarding pension plan assets, benefit obligations,
cash flows, benefit costs and related information. The Company
adopted the new disclosures required as of December 31,
2003. See Note 9.
Effective December 31, 2003, the Company
adopted the disclosure requirements of Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-01, The Meaning
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments. Disclosures are required for
unrealized losses on fixed maturity and equity securities
classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The
disclosure requirements include quantitative information
regarding the aggregate amount of unrealized losses and the
associated fair value of the investments in an unrealized loss
position, segregated into time periods for which the investments
have been in an unrealized loss position. Certain qualitative
disclosures about the unrealized holdings are also required in
order to provide additional information that the Company
considered in concluding that the unrealized losses were not
other than temporary. See Note 2.
In May 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for
classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial
instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Adoption of this
statement did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations.
In April 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The
statement amended and clarified accounting for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded
in other contracts, and for hedging activities under
SFAS No. 133. The adoption of SFAS No. 149
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51
(FIN 46), which requires an enterprise to
assess whether consolidation of an entity is appropriate based
upon its interests in a variable interest entity
(VIE). The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
condition or results of operations as there were no material
VIEs identified which required consolidation.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised
version of FIN 46 (FIN 46R), which
incorporated a number of modifications and changes made to
FIN 46. FIN 46R replaces the previously issued
FIN 46 and, subject to certain special provisions, is
effective no later than the end of the first reporting period
that ends after December 15, 2003 for entities considered
to be special-purpose entities. The Company adopted FIN 46R
in the fourth quarter of 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did
not result in the consolidation of any material VIEs but
resulted in the deconsolidation of VIEs that issued Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
(trust preferred securities). The Company is not the
primary beneficiary of the VIEs, which issued the trust
preferred securities. The Company does not own any of the trust
preferred securities, which were issued to unrelated third
parties. These trust preferred securities are considered the
principal variable interests issued by the VIEs. As a result,
the VIEs, which the Company previously consolidated, are no
longer consolidated. The sole assets of the VIEs are junior
subordinated debentures issued by the Company with payment terms
identical to the trust preferred securities. Previously, the
trust preferred securities were reported as debt on the
Companys consolidated balance sheets. At December 31,
2003 and 2002, the impact of deconsolidation was to increase
debt by $1,238 and $542, respectively. See Note 6 for
disclosure of information related to these VIEs.
48
In November 2002, the FASB issued
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45). Adoption of this statement did not
have an impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In June 2002, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses
financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with
exit or disposal activities and supercedes EITF Issue
No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)
(Issue 94-3). Adoption of this statement did
not have an impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In April 2002, the FASB issued FASB
No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4,
44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and
Technical Corrections. Adoption of the provisions of
SFAS No. 145 did not have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards
Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (AcSEC) issued Statement of
Position 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt
Securities (SOP 03-3). SOP 03-3
addresses the accounting for differences between contractual and
expected cash flows to be collected from an investment in loans
or fixed maturity securities acquired in a transfer if those
differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit
quality. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have
material impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In July 2003, AcSEC issued financial
Statement of Position 03-1, Accounting and Reporting
by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional
Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts (the
SOP). The SOP addresses a wide variety of topics,
many of which are not applicable to the business which the
Company sells. Adoption of this statement is not expected to
have a material impact on the Companys financial condition
or results of operations.
In August 2001, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143). This standard
provides the financial accounting and reporting for the cost of
legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long lived assets. In accordance with SFAS 143, asset
retirement obligations will be recorded at fair value in the
period they are incurred if a reasonable estimate can be made.
The adoption of SFAS 143 did not have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial condition or results
of operations.
The preparation of financial statements and
related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates and assumptions are used in developing and
evaluating deferred income taxes, deferred acquisition costs,
insurance reserves, investments, pension benefits, commitments
and contingencies, among others, and actual results could differ
from managements estimates.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior
year financial information to conform to the current year
presentation.
49
Investments were comprised of the following:
Bonds and short-term investments having an
amortized cost of $16,988 and $16,166 were on deposit with
insurance regulatory authorities at December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively, in accordance with statutory requirements.
50
Securities with unrealized losses at
December 31, 2003 were as follows:
Market changes in interest rates and credit
spreads result in changes in the fair values of investments and
are accumulated and reported as unrealized gains and losses. The
majority of the unrealized losses, $2,065 of the total
unrealized losses of $2,262, has been in an unrealized loss
position of less than twelve months and is primarily
attributable to recent increases in interest yields on
comparable investments.
Excluding U.S. Treasury Securities and
Obligations of U.S. Government Corporations and Agencies,
the Company held seventeen investments with unrealized losses,
four of which existed in excess of twelve months. Of the
seventeen investments with unrealized losses, only two (both
redeemable preferred stocks) had a fair value less than 90% of
the investments original amortized cost; and both had an
unrealized loss in excess of twelve months. One of the
redeemable preferred stocks was issued by a company providing
scheduled air transportation of passengers and cargo throughout
the U.S. and the world. The other redeemable preferred stock was
issued by a company providing parking and related services
primarily in the U.S., but also in Europe and Central and South
America. Both of these businesses are cyclical and are affected
by consumer confidence in the overall economy. The Company
continues to monitor these investments but at December 31,
2003 believed the impairments to be temporary.
During the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, the Company recorded impairments of $995 and $242,
respectively, related to a common stock investment and $159 and
$0, respectively, related to an other invested asset. There were
no impairments recorded for the year ended December 31,
2001.
As part of the Companys ongoing investment
review, the Company has reviewed its investment portfolio and
concluded that there were no additional other than temporary
impairments as of December 31, 2003 or 2002. Due to the
issuers continued satisfaction of the investment
obligations in accordance with their contractual terms and
managements expectation that they will continue to do so,
managements intent and ability to hold these securities,
as well as the evaluation of the fundamentals of the
issuers financial condition and other objective evidence,
the Company believes that unrealized losses on investments at
December 31, 2003 and 2002 were temporary.
The evaluation for other than temporary
impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is
subject to risks and uncertainties in the determination of
whether declines in the fair value of investments are other than
temporary. The risks and uncertainties include changes in
general economic conditions, the issuers financial
condition or near term recovery prospects and the effects of
changes in interest rates.
The amortized cost and carrying value of fixed
maturities and short-term investments at December 31, 2003
by contractual maturity were as follows. Actual maturities may
differ from contractual
51
Investment income was earned from the following
sources:
A summary of realized investment gains (losses)
follows:
52
Proceeds from the sale of investments were as
follows:
The Companys investment in the common stock
of Wachovia Corporation exceeds 10% of shareholders equity
at December 31, 2003. The carrying value of this investment
at December 31, 2003 was $20,621 with a cost basis of
$3,927.
The Companys bond portfolio included 99%
investment grade securities at December 31, 2003 as defined
by the NAIC.
The following table presents the Companys
reserves for life, accident, health and property and casualty
losses as well as loss adjustment expenses.
Annualized premiums for accident and health
insurance policies were $52,435 and $48,360 at December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
Liabilities for life insurance future policy
benefits are based upon assumed future investment yields,
mortality rates, and withdrawal rates after giving effect to
possible risks of adverse deviation. The assumed mortality and
withdrawal rates are based upon the Companys experience.
The interest rates assumed for life, accident and health are
generally: (i) 2.5% to 5.5% for issues prior to 1977,
(ii) 7% graded to 5.5% for 1977 through 1979 issues,
(iii) 9% for 1980 through 1987 issues, and (iv) 5% to
7% for 1988 and later issues.
53
Loss and claim reserves represent estimates of
projected ultimate losses and are based upon:
(a) managements estimate of ultimate liability and
claim adjusters evaluations for unpaid claims reported
prior to the close of the accounting period, (b) estimates
of incurred but not reported claims based on past experience,
and (c) estimates of loss adjustment expenses. The
estimated liability is continually reviewed by management and
updated with changes to the estimated liability recorded in the
statement of operations in the year in which such changes are
known.
Activity in the liability for unpaid loss and
claim reserves is summarized as follows:
Following is a reconciliation of total incurred
claims to total insurance benefits and losses incurred:
In accordance with general practice in the
insurance industry, portions of the life, property and casualty
insurance written by the Company are reinsured; however, the
Company remains liable with respect to reinsurance ceded should
any reinsurer be unable to meet its obligations. Approximately
90% of the reinsurance receivables were due from four reinsurers
as of December 31, 2003. Reinsurance receivables of $18,297
were with General Reinsurance Corporation, rated AAA
by Standard & Poors and A++
(Superior) by A.M. Best, $3,769 were with First Colony Life
Insurance Company, rated AA by Standard &
Poors and A++ (Superior) by A.M. Best, $10,642
were with PMA Capital Insurance Company (PMA Re),
rated B++ (Very Good) by A.M. Best and $5,955 were
with Swiss Reinsurance Corporation, rated AA by
Standard & Poors and A+ (Superior) by
A.M. Best. Allowances for uncollectible amounts are established
against reinsurance receivables, if appropriate. On
November 4, 2003, A.M. Best downgraded the financial
strength rating of PMA Re to B++ (Very Good) from
A- (Excellent). The rating action reflects PMA
Res weak stand-alone capital position
54
Components of reinsurance receivables were as
follows:
55
A reconciliation of the differences between
income taxes computed at the federal statutory income tax rate
and the (benefit) expense for income taxes was as follows:
Deferred tax liabilities and assets at
December 31, 2003 and 2002 were comprised of the following:
The components of the (benefit) expense were:
At December 31, 2003, the Company had
regular federal net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $17,225 expiring generally between 2006 and 2009.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, a valuation allowance of
$2,346 and $3,824, respectively, was established against
deferred income tax benefits relating primarily to net operating
loss carryforwards that may not be realized. In 2003 and 2002,
the
56
At December 31, 2002, the Companys
$32,000 of bank debt with Wachovia Bank, N.A.
(Wachovia) consisted of a single term loan with an
annual installment of $2,000 due on or before December 31,
2003 together with a final payment of $30,000 due on
June 30, 2004. In connection with a May 2003 pooled private
placement of trust preferred securities, the bank debt was
reduced by $17,000 and the $2,000 installment due on or before
December 31, 2003 was satisfied. Subsequent thereto and
effective June 30, 2003, the Company negotiated and
executed an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement relating to
the remaining $15,000. The loan matures on June 30, 2008
and requires minimum annual payments as follows:
2004 $3,000; 2005 $1,750;
2006 $1,750; 2007 - $1,750; 2008 $6,750.
The interest rate on the borrowing is LIBOR plus a margin
ranging between 1.75% and 2.50%. The applicable margin rate is
determined based on the ratio of funded debt to consolidated
total capitalization, all as defined. As of December 31,
2003 the stated interest rate on the bank debt was LIBOR + 2.50%
or 3.64%. The loan requires the Company to comply with certain
covenants including, among others, ratios that relate funded
debt to capitalization and interest coverage as well as the
maintenance of minimum levels of tangible net worth. The Company
also must comply with limitations on capital expenditures,
additional debt obligations, equity repurchases and redemptions,
as well as minimum risked based capital levels.
The Company has formed two Connecticut statutory
business trusts, which exist for the exclusive purposes of:
(i) issuing trust preferred securities representing
undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trusts;
(ii) investing the gross proceeds of the trust preferred
securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures
(Junior Subordinated Debentures) of Atlantic
American Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those
activities necessary or incidental thereto. In accordance with
the adoption of FIN 46R, the Company has deconsolidated the
trust preferred securities. For further discussion of the
adoption of FIN 46R, see Note 1.
57
The financial structure of Atlantic American
Statutory Trust I and II, as of December 31, 2003 and
2002, were as follows:
On March 21, 2001, the Company entered into
a $15,000 notional amount interest rate swap agreement with
Wachovia to hedge its interest rate risk on a portion of its
outstanding borrowings. The interest rate swap was effective on
April 2, 2001 and matures on June 30, 2004. The
Company has agreed to pay a fixed rate of 5.1% and receive
3-month LIBOR until maturity. The settlement date and the reset
date occur every 90 days following April 2, 2001 until
maturity.
The estimated fair value and related carrying
value of the Companys interest rate swap agreement at
December 31, 2003 and 2002 was a liability of approximately
$444 and $914, respectively.
58
From time to time, the Company and its
subsidiaries are involved in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to and in the ordinary course of their businesses. In
the opinion of management, such claims will not have a material
effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.
The Companys rental expense, including
common area charges, for operating leases was $1,867, $1,811,
and $1,732 in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The
Companys future minimum lease obligations under
non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
In accordance with the Companys 1992
Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors may grant up to 1,800,000
stock options or share awards. The Board of Directors may grant:
(a) incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(b) non-qualified stock options; (c) performance
units; (d) awards of restricted shares of the
Companys common stock and other stock unit awards;
(e) deferred shares of common stock; or (f) all or any
combination of the foregoing to officers and key employees.
Stock options granted under this plan expire five or ten years
from the date of grant, as specified in an award agreement.
Vesting occurs at 50% upon issuance of an option, and the
remaining portion vest in 25% increments in each of the
following two years. In accordance with the Companys
1996 Director Stock Option Plan, a maximum of 200,000 stock
options may be granted that fully vest six months after the
grant date. In accordance with the Companys 2002 Incentive
Plan (the 2002 Plan), the Board of Directors may
grant up to 2,000,000 stock options or share awards. Subject to
adjustment as provided in the 2002 Plan, the Board of Directors
may grant: (a) incentive stock options;
(b) non-qualified stock options; (c) stock
appreciation rights; (d) restricted shares;
(e) deferred shares; and (f) performance shares and/or
performance units. Further, the Board may authorize the granting
to non-employee directors of stock options and/or restricted
shares. A total of 41,503 and 29,997 restricted shares were
issued to the Companys Board of Directors under the 2002
Plan in 2003 and 2002, respectively. As of December 31,
2003, an aggregate of forty-six employees, officers and
directors held options under the three plans.
59
A summary of the status of the Companys
stock options at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, is as
follows:
Data on options outstanding and exercisable at
December 31, 2003 is as follows:
The weighted average fair value of options
granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and was $1.15, $1.62, and
$.95 for grants in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Fair
value determinations were based on expected dividend yields of
zero, expected lives of 5 or 10 years, risk free interest
rates of 4.21%, 3.92%, and 4.49%, and expected volatility of
60.08%, 69.11%, and 64.99%, for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
The Company initiated an employees savings
plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code in
May 1995. The plan covers substantially all of the
Companys employees, except employees of American Southern.
Under the plan, employees generally may elect to contribute up
to 16% of their compensation to the plan. The Company makes a
matching contribution on behalf of each employee in an amount
equal to 50% of the first 6% of such contributions. The
Companys matching contribution is in Company stock and had
a value of approximately $256, $219, and $159 in 2003, 2002, and
2001, respectively.
The Company has both a funded and unfunded
noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering the
employees of American Southern. The plans provide defined
benefits based on years of service and average salary. The
Companys general funding policy is to contribute annually
the maximum amount that can be deducted for income tax purposes.
60
Obligation and Funded Status
The accumulated benefit obligation for all
defined benefit plans at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was
$3,797 and $3,301, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used to
determine the benefit obligation at December 31, were as
follows:
Included in the above is one plan which is
unfunded. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit
obligation and fair value of plan assets for this plan were
$1,086, $891, and $0, respectively, as of December 31, 2003
and $1,005, $794, and $0, respectively, as of December 31,
2002.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit
Cost
Net periodic pension cost for the Companys
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 included the
following components:
61
The weighted-average assumptions used to
determine the net periodic benefit cost at December 31,
were as follows:
The qualified defined benefit plan assets were
invested in the INVESCO Total Return Fund (the
Fund), the prospectus for which indicates a
10 year average annual return of approximately 7%;
accordingly, a 7.00% rate of return was used to calculate the
periodic benefit cost for 2003. The Fund normally invests at
least 65% of its assets in common stocks and at least 30% of its
assets in debt securities that are investment grade at the time
of purchase. The remaining assets of the Fund are allocated to
other investments at the Fund managers discretion, based
upon current business, economic and market conditions.
The Companys investment strategy with
respect to pension assets is to invest the assets in accordance
with ERISA and fiduciary standards. The long-term primary
investment objectives are to: 1) provide for a reasonable
amount of long-term growth of capital, without undue exposure to
risk; and protect the assets from erosion of purchasing power,
and 2) provide investment results that meet or exceed the
actuarially assumed long-term rate of return. The Fund has not
included any equity securities of the Company at any time.
Expected Cash Flows
The Company expects to contribute $236 for all
defined benefit plans in 2004.
The Company had 134,000 shares of
Series B Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred
Stock) outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002,
having a stated value of $100 per share. Annual dividends
on the Series B Preferred Stock are $9.00 per share
and are cumulative. Dividends accrue whether or not declared by
the Board of Directors. The Series B Preferred Stock is not
currently convertible, but may become convertible into shares of
the Companys common stock under certain circumstances. In
such event, the Series B Preferred Stock would be
convertible into an aggregate of approximately
3,358,000 shares of the Companys common stock at a
conversion rate of $3.99 per share. The Series B
Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the Company. As
of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had accrued but
unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock of $9,648
and $8,442, respectively. For all periods in which the Company
had an accumulated deficit, dividends on the Series B
Preferred Stock were accrued from additional paid in capital.
The Company had 5,000 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock (Series C Preferred
Stock) outstanding at December 31, 2003, having a
stated value of $100 per share. Annual dividends are
$9.00 per share and are cumulative. The Series C
Preferred Stock is not currently convertible but may become
convertible into shares of the Companys common stock under
certain circumstances. In such event, the Series C
Preferred Stock would be convertible into an aggregate of
approximately 125,000 shares of the Companys common
stock at a conversion price of $3.99 per share. The
Series C Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the
Company. During 2003, in accordance with the terms of the
Series C Preferred Stock, the Company exercised its right
to redeem 20,000 of the outstanding shares of the Series C
Preferred Stock. These shares were redeemed at the redemption
price specified in the terms of the Series C Preferred
Stock, $100 per share, or $2,000. The Company paid $143 and
$225 in dividends to the holders of the Series C Preferred
Stock during 2003 and 2002, respectively. For all periods in
which the Company had an accumulated deficit, dividends on the
Series C Preferred Stock were
62
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator
of the earnings per common share calculations is as follows:
63
Average outstanding options of 335,000 were
excluded from the earnings per common share calculation in 2003
and outstanding stock options of 408,500 and 712,500 were
excluded from the earnings per common share calculation in 2002
and 2001, respectively, since their impact was antidilutive. The
assumed conversions of the Series B and Series C
Preferred Stock were also excluded from the earnings per common
share calculation for 2003, 2002, and 2001 since their impact
was antidilutive.
The assets, liabilities and results of operations
have been reported on the basis of GAAP, which varies from
statutory accounting practices (SAP) prescribed or
permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. The principal
differences between SAP and GAAP are that under SAP:
(i) certain assets that are non-admitted assets are
eliminated from the balance sheet; (ii) acquisition costs
for policies are expensed as incurred, while they are deferred
and amortized over the estimated life of the policies under
GAAP; (iii) the provision that is made for deferred income
taxes is different than under GAAP; (iv) the timing of
establishing certain reserves is different than under GAAP; and
(v) valuation allowances are established against
investments.
The amount of statutory net income and surplus
(shareholders equity) for the Companys insurance
subsidiaries for the years ended December 31 were as
follows:
Under the insurance code of the state of
jurisdiction under which each insurance subsidiary operates,
dividend payments to the Company by its insurance subsidiaries
are subject to certain limitations without the prior approval of
the Insurance Commissioner. The Company received dividends of
$5,728, $7,076 and $7,099 in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively,
from its subsidiaries. In 2004, dividend payments by insurance
subsidiaries in excess of $12,536 would require prior approval.
In the normal course of business and, in
managements opinion, at terms comparable to those
available from unrelated parties, the Company has engaged in
transactions with its Chairman and his affiliates from time to
time. These transactions include leasing of office space as well
as investing and financing activities. A brief description of
each of these follows.
64
The Company leases approximately
65,489 square feet of office and covered garage space from
an affiliated company. During the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002, and 2001, the Company paid $1,000, $987 and $961,
respectively, under the leases.
Financing for the Company has been provided
through affiliates of the Company or its Chairman, in the form
of the Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred
Stock (See Note 10).
The Company has made mortgage loans to finance
properties owned by Leath Furniture, LLC (Leath),
which is owned by an affiliate of the Chairman. At
December 31, 2003 and 2002, the balance of mortgage loans
owed by Leath to the Companys insurance subsidiary was
$3,152 and $3,292, respectively. For 2003, 2002, and 2001,
interest paid by Leath on the mortgage loans totaled $299, $311,
and $323, respectively.
Certain members of management are on the Boards
of Directors of Bull Run Corporation (Bull Run) and
Gray Television, Inc. (Gray). At
December 31, 2003, the Company owned 184,337 common shares
of Bull Run and 376,060 shares of Gray Common Stock
Class A and 106,000 shares of Gray Common Stock
Class B. The Company also owned 350 shares of
Grays Series C Preferred Stock and 2,000 shares
of Bull Runs Series D Preferred Stock as of
December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2002, the Company
owned 131,137 common shares of Bull Run and 376,060 shares
of Grays Common Stock Class A and 106,000 shares
of Grays Common Stock Class B. In addition, the
Company owned 350 shares of Grays Series C
Preferred Stock and 2,000 shares of Bull Runs
Series B Preferred Stock. The aggregate carrying value of
the investments in Bull Run and Gray at December 31, 2003
were $2,225 and $10,808, respectively and at December 31,
2002 were $3,219 and $8,990, respectively.
In 1998, Georgia Casualty began assuming
workers compensation premiums from Delta Fire &
Casualty Insurance Company which is controlled by certain
affiliates of the Company. Premiums assumed and commissions paid
in 2003 were $1,817 and $168, respectively, $1,090 and $128 in
2002, respectively and $1,554 and $212 in 2001, respectively.
In 1998, American Southern formed the American
Auto Insurance Agency (the Agency) in a joint
venture with Carolina Motor Club, Inc. to market personal
automobile insurance to the members of the automobile club.
American Southern holds a 50% interest in the joint venture and
underwrites the majority of the standard automobile business
written by the Agency. This program, which began writing
business in 1999, had gross written premiums of approximately
$8,311, $7,083 and $6,084 in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Note 14. Segment
Information
The Companys primary insurance subsidiaries
operate with relative autonomy and each company is evaluated
based on its individual performance. American Southern,
Association Casualty, and Georgia Casualty operate in the
Property and Casualty insurance market, while Bankers Fidelity
operates in the Life and Health insurance market. All segments
derive revenue from the collection of premiums, as well
65
66
The estimated fair value amounts have been
determined by the Company using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is necessary to interpret market data and to develop
the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts
which the Company could realize in a current market exchange.
The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair
value amounts.
The fair value estimates as of December 31,
2003 and 2002 were based on pertinent information available to
management as of the respective dates. Although management is
not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the
estimated fair value amounts, current estimates of fair value
may differ significantly from amounts that might ultimately be
realized.
67
The following describes the methods and
assumptions used by the Company in estimating fair values:
Cash and Cash
Equivalents, including Short-term Investments
Non-publicly
Traded Invested Assets
Mortgage
Loans
Debt Payable
and Junior Subordinated Debentures
The Companys comprehensive income consists
of net income, unrealized gains and losses on securities
available for sale and fair value adjustments to the interest
rate swap, net of applicable income taxes.
Other than net income, the other components of
comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:
68
The following table sets forth a summary of the
quarterly unaudited results of operations for the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2003:
69
Note 1.
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Principles of Consolidation
Premium Revenue and Cost
Recognition
Goodwill
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003
2002
2001
$
6,844
$
(12,215
)
$
3,597
15,816
802
$
6,844
$
3,601
$
4,399
$
.26
$
.10
$
.14
$
.25
$
.10
$
.14
Investments
Income Taxes
Table of Contents
Earnings Per Common Share
Stock Options
2003(2)
2002(1)
2002(2)
2001(2)
$
6,844
$
3,601
$
(12,215
)
$
3,597
82
50
50
29
(198
)
(270
)
(270
)
(199
)
$
6,728
$
3,381
$
(12,435
)
$
3,427
$
.26
$
.10
$
(.64
)
$
.10
$
.25
$
.09
$
(.65
)
$
.09
$
.25
$
.10
$
(.63
)
$
.10
$
.25
$
.09
$
(.64
)
$
.09
(1)
Based on income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle.
(2)
Based on net income (loss).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Table of Contents
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting
Standards
Table of Contents
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of
Financial Statements
Reclassifications
Table of Contents
Note 2.
Investments
2003
Gross
Gross
Carrying
Unrealized
Unrealized
Amortized
Value
Gains
Losses
Cost
$
117,442
$
1,833
$
1,812
$
117,421
1,446
98
1,348
82,277
4,910
208
77,575
4,079
136
3,943
24,205
1,537
198
22,866
229,449
8,514
2,218
223,153
44,000
22,336
44
21,708
4,639
4,639
3,189
3,189
2,375
2,375
1,238
1,238
284,890
30,850
2,262
256,302
25,819
25,819
$
310,709
$
30,850
$
2,262
$
282,121
2002
Gross
Gross
Carrying
Unrealized
Unrealized
Amortized
Value
Gains
Losses
Cost
$
114,307
$
3,753
$
$
110,554
3,064
121
2,943
58,418
2,996
977
56,399
6,041
265
5,776
25,180
600
410
24,990
207,010
7,735
1,387
200,662
32,062
15,387
377
17,052
5,031
224
5,255
3,330
3,330
2,409
2,409
542
542
250,384
23,122
1,988
229,250
21,487
21,487
$
271,871
$
23,122
$
1,988
$
250,737
Table of Contents
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
$
41,741
$
1,812
$
$
$
41,741
$
1,812
6,525
184
3,043
24
9,568
208
1,102
25
502
173
1,604
198
1,260
44
1,260
44
$
50,628
$
2,065
$
3,545
$
197
$
54,173
$
2,262
Table of Contents
Carrying
Amortized
Value
Cost
$
30,743
$
30,637
18,965
17,881
34,488
32,376
166,993
164,134
4,079
3,944
$
255,268
$
248,972
2003
2002
2001
$
13,726
$
11,966
Bonds
$
10,530
1,137
1,146
Common and preferred stocks
2,438
299
311
Mortgage loans
323
239
458
Short-term investments
1,071
227
130
Other
(45
)
15,628
14,011
Total investment income
14,317
(269
)
(218
)
Less investment expenses
(176
)
$
15,359
$
13,793
Net investment income
$
14,141
2003
Fixed
Other
Stocks
Maturities
Invested Assets
Total
$
297
$
1,257
$
100
$
1,654
(995
)
(123
)
(176
)
(1,294
)
$
(698
)
$
1,134
$
(76
)
$
360
2002
Fixed
Other
Stocks
Maturities
Invested Assets
Total
$
556
$
302
$
5
$
863
(270
)
(6
)
(276
)
$
286
$
296
$
5
$
587
2001
Other
Stocks
Bonds
Invested Assets
Total
$
1,189
$
927
$
$
2,116
(289
)
(27
)
(92
)
(408
)
$
900
$
900
$
(92
)
$
1,708
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
$
1,572
$
360
Common and preferred stocks
$
18,194
18,344
6,066
Bonds
19,717
34
304
Student loans
385
964
552
Other investments
826
$
20,914
$
7,282
Total proceeds
$
39,122
Note 3.
Insurance Reserves and Policyholder
Funds
Amount of Insurance
in Force
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
37,639
$
34,896
$
269,931
$
266,682
6,151
6,669
10,814
11,974
773
821
44,563
42,386
$
280,745
$
278,656
2,663
2,381
47,226
44,767
61,150
55,900
150,092
148,691
5,277
4,777
$
263,745
$
254,135
Future Policy Benefits
Table of Contents
Loss and Claim Reserves
2003
2002
2001
$
148,691
$
143,515
$
133,220
(39,380
)
(47,729
)
(38,851
)
109,311
95,786
94,369
98,536
104,724
108,068
139
(57
)
(2,415
)
98,675
104,667
105,653
56,229
52,253
59,506
43,417
38,889
44,730
99,646
91,142
104,236
108,340
109,311
95,786
41,752
39,380
47,729
$
150,092
$
148,691
$
143,515
2003
2002
2001
$
98,675
$
104,667
$
105,653
(75
)
29
(150
)
1,489
1,490
1,393
2,254
2,923
$
102,343
$
109,109
$
106,896
Note 4.
Reinsurance
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
$
178,320
$
168,500
$
153,743
7,843
20,410
22,708
(25,562
)
(28,993
)
(25,399
)
160,601
159,917
151,052
(5,250
)
(4,875
)
(11,889
)
(639
)
(543
)
6,426
(5,889
)
(5,418
)
(5,463
)
$
154,712
$
154,499
$
145,589
$
121,639
$
132,567
$
132,724
(19,296
)
(23,458
)
(25,828
)
$
102,343
$
109,109
$
106,896
2003
2002
$
41,752
$
39,380
1,161
2,939
7,556
$
42,913
$
49,875
Table of Contents
Note 5.
Income Taxes
2003
2002
2001
$
2,284
$
1,086
$
1,489
(598
)
(628
)
(469
)
238
170
314
(1,478
)
(1,786
)
(827
)
537
(767
)
2
123
81
68
$
(319
)
$
(498
)
$
656
2003
2002
$
(5,871
)
$
(5,495
)
(10,006
)
(7,397
)
(830
)
(902
)
(99
)
(118
)
(16,806
)
(13,912
)
6,029
7,389
10,193
10,173
348
722
918
841
18,210
18,403
(2,346
)
(3,824
)
$
(942
)
$
667
2003
2002
2001
$
842
$
$
68
2
123
81
(1,163
)
(621
)
507
$
(319
)
$
(498
)
$
656
Table of Contents
Note 6.
Credit Arrangements
Bank Debt
Junior Subordinated
Debentures
Table of Contents
Atlantic American
Atlantic American
Statutory Trust I
Statutory Trust II
$18,042
$23,196
18,042
23,196
18,042
LIBOR + 4.00%
LIBOR + 4.10%
Quarterly
Quarterly
December 4, 2032
May 15, 2033
December 4, 2007
May 15, 2008
December 4, 2002
May 15, 2003
17,500
22,500
$1
$1
17,500
22,500
LIBOR + 4.00%
LIBOR + 4.10%
Quarterly
Quarterly
Atlantic American Corporation
Atlantic American Corporation
(1)
For each of the respective debentures, the
Company has the right at any time, and from time to time, to
defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures
for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters up to the
debentures maturity date. During any such period, interest
will continue to accrue and the Company may not declare or pay
any cash dividends or distributions on, or purchase, the
Companys common stock nor make any principal, interest or
premium payments on or repurchase any debt securities that rank
equally with or junior to the Junior Subordinated Debentures.
The Company will have the right at any time to dissolve the
Trust and cause the Junior Subordinated Debentures to be
distributed to the holders of the trust preferred securities.
(2)
The Junior Subordinated Debentures are unsecured
and rank junior and subordinate in right of payment to all
senior debt of the Company and are effectively subordinated to
all existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries.
(3)
The Company has guaranteed, on a subordinated
basis, all of the obligations under the trust preferred
securities, including payment of the redemption price and any
accumulated and unpaid distributions to the extent of available
funds and upon dissolution, winding up or liquidation.
Note 7.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Table of Contents
Note 8.
Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
Operating Lease Commitments
Year Ending December 31,
$
1,589
1,438
748
756
764
1,623
$
6,918
Note 9.
Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Options
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Average
Average
Average
Shares
Exercise Price
Shares
Exercise Price
Shares
Exercise Price
1,008,000
$
2.31
1,275,000
$
2.63
1,024,000
$
3.43
227,000
1.59
58,000
2.09
572,000
1.26
(20,000
)
1.25
(10,000
)
1.25
(304,500
)
3.54
(315,000
)
3.58
(321,000
)
2.75
910,500
1.74
1,008,000
2.31
1,275,000
2.63
784,500
1.76
847,375
2.49
991,250
3.02
2,452,150
2,416,153
194,150
Outstanding
Exercisable
Range of
Number of
Weighted Average
Weighted Average
Number of
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Options
Remaining Life
Exercise Price
Options
Exercise Price
492,500
7.79
$
1.25
492,500
$
1.25
286,500
8.96
$
1.67
160,500
$
1.70
15,000
2.41
$
2.68
15,000
$
2.68
111,500
<1.00
$
3.88
111,500
$
3.88
5,000
<1.00
$
4.06
5,000
$
4.06
910,500
784,500
401(k) Plan
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Table of Contents
2003
2002
$
4,195
$
3,810
144
123
266
250
286
118
(90
)
(106
)
4,801
4,195
1,999
2,183
250
191
299
(269
)
(90
)
(106
)
2,458
1,999
(2,343
)
(2,196
)
1,531
1,492
(5
)
(5
)
2
(105
)
(96
)
$
(922
)
$
(803
)
2003
2002
6.00
%
6.50
%
4.50
%
4.50
%
2003
2002
2001
$
144
$
123
$
136
266
250
263
(137
)
(170
)
(192
)
88
41
35
$
361
$
244
$
242
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
6.50
%
7.00
%
7.00
%
7.00
%
8.00
%
8.00
%
4.50
%
4.50
%
4.50
%
Note 10.
Preferred Stock
Table of Contents
Note 11.
Earnings Per Common Share
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Per Share
Income
Shares
Amount
$
6,844
21,200
(1,349
)
5,495
21,200
$
.26
375
$
5,495
21,575
$
.25
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2002
Per Share
Income
Shares
Amount
$
3,601
21,307
(1,431
)
2,170
21,307
$
0.10
(15,816
)
21,307
(0.74
)
$
(13,646
)
21,307
$
(0.64
)
$
2,170
21,307
354
2,170
21,661
$
0.10
(15,816
)
21,661
(0.73
)
$
(13,646
)
21,661
$
(0.63
)
Table of Contents
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2001
Per Share
Income
Shares
Amount
$
3,597
21,198
(1,431
)
2,166
21,198
$
.10
160
$
2,166
21,358
$
.10
Note 12.
Statutory Reporting
2003
2002
2001
$
3,102
$
4,002
$
2,948
5,224
1,270
3,539
$
8,326
$
5,272
$
6,487
$
31,197
$
25,850
$
22,739
74,937
68,869
61,922
$
106,134
$
94,719
$
84,661
Note 13.
Related Party and Other Transactions
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
American
Georgia
Bankers
Association
Corporate
Adjustments &
Southern
Casualty
Fidelity
Casualty
& Other
Eliminations
Consolidated
$
37,358
$
34,319
$
62,683
$
20,352
$
$
$
154,712
4,844
3,107
5,650
2,396
1,725
(1,734
)
15,988
97
28
8,375
(7,600
)
900
42,202
37,523
68,333
22,776
10,100
(9,334
)
171,600
20,977
22,258
43,863
15,245
102,343
(7,807
)
(7,439
)
(1,427
)
(3,879
)
(20,552
)
6,842
6,989
1,998
3,787
19,616
14,343
14,600
18,630
8,235
17,194
(9,334
)
63,668
34,355
36,408
63,064
23,388
17,194
(9,334
)
165,075
$
7,847
$
1,115
$
5,269
$
(612
)
$
( 7,094
)
$
$
6,525
$
113,299
$
121,818
$
127,642
$
96,275
$
153,635
$
(169,117
)
$
443,552
American
Georgia
Bankers
Association
Corporate
Adjustments
Southern
Casualty
Fidelity
Casualty
& Other
& Eliminations
Consolidated
$
39,914
$
29,744
$
60,597
$
24,244
$
$
$
154,499
4,251
3,302
4,679
2,287
200
(121
)
14,598
188
47
88
7,529
(6,704
)
1,148
44,353
33,093
65,276
26,619
7,729
(6,825
)
170,245
26,353
19,950
42,404
20,402
109,109
(5,898
)
(6,591
)
(2,533
)
(3,829
)
(18,851
)
5,826
5,935
2,383
4,390
18,534
11,451
13,977
18,957
7,637
13,153
(6,825
)
58,350
37,732
33,271
61,211
28,600
13,153
(6,825
)
167,142
6,621
(178
)
4,065
(1,981
)
(5,424
)
3,103
(15,816
)
(15,816
)
$
6,621
$
(178
)
$
4,065
$
(17,797
)
$
(5,424
)
$
$
(12,713
)
$
112,337
$
114,308
$
115,275
$
84,773
$
140,340
$
(145,509
)
$
421,524
Table of Contents
American
Georgia
Bankers
Association
Corporate
Adjustments
Southern
Casualty
Fidelity
Casualty
& Other
& Eliminations
Consolidated
$
39,023
$
25,579
$
55,276
$
25,711
$
$
$
145,589
4,630
2,907
4,968
3,462
945
(887
)
16,025
126
29
495
6,978
(5,934
)
1,694
43,779
28,515
60,244
29,668
7,923
(6,821
)
163,308
26,069
17,644
39,570
23,613
106,896
(4,502
)
(4,876
)
(3,393
)
(5,404
)
(18,175
)
4,651
5,122
2,478
6,181
140
18,572
10,765
8,519
18,219
8,203
12,877
(6,821
)
51,762
36,983
26,409
56,874
32,593
13,017
(6,821
)
159,055
$
6,796
$
2,106
$
3,370
$
(2,925
)
$
(5,094
)
$
$
4,253
$
110,680
$
103,701
$
108,604
$
90,505
$
140,150
$
(141,621
)
$
412,019
Note 15.
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
2003
2002
Carrying
Estimated
Carrying
Estimated
Amount
Fair Value
Amount
Fair Value
$
34,238
$
34,238
$
41,638
$
41,638
229,449
229,449
207,010
207,010
44,000
44,000
32,062
32,062
3,189
3,919
3,330
4,127
2,375
2,375
2,409
2,409
4,639
4,639
5,031
5,031
1,238
1,238
542
542
15,000
15,000
32,000
32,000
41,238
41,238
18,042
18,042
Table of Contents
The carrying amount approximates fair value due
to the short-term nature of the instruments.
Fixed Maturities, Common and Non-Redeemable
Preferred Stocks and Publicly Traded Other Invested
Assets
The carrying amount is determined in accordance
with methods prescribed by the NAIC, which do not differ
materially from nationally quoted market prices.
The fair value of investments in certain limited
partnerships, which are included in other invested assets on the
consolidated balance sheet, were determined by officers of those
limited partnerships.
The fair values are estimated based on quoted
market prices for those or similar investments.
The fair value is estimated based on the quoted
market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current
rates offered for debt having the same or similar returns and
remaining maturities.
Note 16.
Reconciliation of Other Comprehensive
Income
December 31,
2003
2002
2001
$
360
$
587
$
1,708
$
7,813
$
7,731
$
5,206
(360
)
(587
)
(1,708
)
7,453
7,144
3,498
470
(382
)
(532
)
(2,773
)
(2,367
)
(1,038
)
$
5,150
$
4,395
$
1,928
Table of Contents
Note 17.
Quarterly Financial Information
(Unaudited)
2003
2002
First
Second
Third
Fourth
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
$
44,018
$
43,464
$
41,534
$
42,584
$
40,069
$
43,079
$
43,151
$
43,946
$
864
$
1,712
$
1,717
$
2,232
$
2,264
$
1,421
$
(525
)
$
(57
)
168
501
(1,549
)
561
759
479
(1,481
)
(255
)
(15,816
)
$
696
$
1,211
$
3,266
$
1,671
$
(14,311
)
$
942
$
956
$
198
$
.02
$
.04
$
.14
$
.06
$
(.69
)
$
.03
$
.03
$
(.01
)
$
.02
$
.04
$
.13
$
.06
$
(.68
)
$
.03
$
.03
$
(.01
)
Table of Contents
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
On June 26, 2002, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Atlantic American Corporation (the Company) determined to end its engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) as auditors and voted to engage the services of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Companys auditors for the Companys 2002 fiscal year, effective immediately.
Andersens report on the Companys consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and through the date their engagement ended, there were no disagreements with Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to Andersens satisfaction, would have caused Andersen to make reference to the subject matter in connection with its report with respect to the Companys consolidated financial statements for such year; and there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
The Company provided Andersen with a copy of the foregoing disclosures. Attached in the 8-K filing dated June 28, 2002, as Exhibit 16.1, is a copy of Andersens letter, dated June 28, 2002, stating its agreement with such statements.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and through June 26, 2002, the Company did not consult Deloitte & Touche LLP with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered with respect to the Companys consolidated financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls and procedures or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.
PART III
With the exception of information relating to the Executive Officers of the Company, which is provided in Part I hereof, the information relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, which is included in Part II, Item 5 hereof, and the information relating to the Companys Code of Ethics, which is included below, all information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled Election of Directors, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance, Executive Compensation, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Ratification of Independent Public Accountants contained in the Companys definitive proxy statement to be delivered in connection with the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 4, 2004.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or any persons performing similar functions, as well as its directors and other employees. A copy of this Code of Ethics is attached as Exhibit 14.1 to this annual report.
70
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) List of documents filed as part of this report:
Financial Statement Schedules
II
|
| Condensed financial information of Registrant for the three years ended December 31, 2003 | ||
III
|
| Supplementary insurance information for the three years ended December 31, 2003 | ||
IV
|
| Reinsurance for the three years ended December 31, 2003 | ||
VI
|
| Supplemental information concerning property-casualty insurance operations for the three years ended December 31, 2003 |
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted as they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. Columns omitted from schedules filed have been omitted because the information is not applicable.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None.
(c)
Exhibits*:
3
.1
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the
registrant, as amended [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002].
3
.2
Bylaws of the registrant [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993].
10
.01
Lease Contract between registrant and Delta Life
Insurance Company dated June 1, 1992 [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992].
10
.02
First Amendment to Lease Contract between
registrant and Delta Life Insurance Company dated June 1,
1993 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.1 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1993].
10
.03
Second Amendment to Lease Contract between
registrant and Delta Life Insurance Company dated August 1,
1994 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.2 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1994].
10
.04
Lease Agreement between Georgia
Casualty & Surety Company and Delta Life Insurance
Company dated September 1, 1991 [incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 to the registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1992].
10
.05
First Amendment to Lease Agreement between
Georgia Casualty & Surety Company and Delta Life
Insurance Company dated June 1,1992 [incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12.1 to the registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1992].
10
.06
Management Agreement between registrant and
Georgia Casualty & Surety Company dated April 1,
1983 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1986].
10
.07**
Minutes of Meeting of Board of Directors of
registrant held February 25, 1992 adopting
registrants 1992 Incentive Plan together with a copy of
that plan, as adopted [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.21 to the registrants Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1991].
10
.08
Loan and Security Agreement dated August 26,
1991, between registrants three insurance subsidiaries
named therein and Leath Furniture, Inc. [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992].
10
.09
First amendment to the amended and reissued
mortgage note dated January 1, 1992, [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.38.1 to the registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992].
71
10
.10
Intercreditor Agreement dated August 26,
1991, between Leath Furniture, Inc., the registrant and the
registrants three insurance subsidiaries named therein
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992].
10
.11
Management Agreement between the registrant and
Atlantic American Life Insurance Company and Bankers Fidelity
Life Insurance Company dated July 1, 1993 [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993].
10
.12
Tax allocation agreement dated January 28,
1994, between registrant and registrants subsidiaries
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1993].
10
.13
Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 24,
1999, by and between Atlantic American Corporation and The Bank
of New York, as Trustee [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Form 8-K dated
July 16, 1999].
10
.14
Reimbursement and Security Agreement, dated as of
June 24, 1999, between Atlantic American Corporation and
Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A. [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Form 8-K dated
July 16, 1999].
10
.15
Revolving Credit Facility, dated as of
July 1, 1999 between Atlantic American Corporation and
Wachovia Bank, N.A. [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Form 8-K dated
July 16, 1999].
10
.16
First Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2000,
to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1999, between
Atlantic American Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A.
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2000].
10
.17
Second Amendment, dated February 9, 2001, to
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1999, between
Atlantic American Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A.
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000].
10
.18
Third Amendment, dated as of December 31,
2001 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1999, between
Atlantic American Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A.
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001].
10
.19
Fourth Amendment, dated November 21, 2002,
to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1999, between
Atlantic American Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A.
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002].
10
.20
Fifth Amendment, dated April 23, 2003, to
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1999, between
Atlantic American Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A.
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003].
10
.21
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as
of June 30, 2003, between Atlantic American Corporation and
Wachovia Bank, N.A. [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003].
10
.22**
Atlantic American Corporation 1992 Incentive Plan
[ incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the
registrants Form S-8 filed on November 1, 1999].
10
.23**
Atlantic American Corporation 1996 Director
Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4
to the registrants Form S-8 filed on November 1,
1999].
10
.24**
Atlantic American Corporation 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the registrants Form S-8 filed on August 2,
2002].
10
.25
Summary Terms of Consulting Arrangement between
Atlantic American Corporation and Samuel E. Hudgins, entered
into in June 2002 [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to the registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002].
14
.1
Code of Ethics.
21
.1
Subsidiaries of the registrant.
23
.1
Consent of Deloitte & Touche
LLP, Independent Auditors.
72
31
.1
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31
.2
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32
.1
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* | The registrant agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request a copy of any instruments defining the rights of securityholders of the registrant that may be omitted from filing in accordance with the Commissions rules and regulations. |
** | Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to, Part IV, Item 15(c) of Form 10-K and Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 29, 2004
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
74
75
(Registrant) ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
By:
/s/ JOHN G. SAMPLE, JR.
John G. Sample, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ J. MACK ROBINSON
J. Mack Robinson
Chairman of the Board
March 29, 2004
/s/ HILTON H. HOWELL, JR.
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 29, 2004
/s/ JOHN G. SAMPLE, JR.
John G. Sample, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
March 29, 2004
/s/ EDWARD E. ELSON
Edward E. Elson
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ SAMUEL E. HUDGINS
Samuel E. Hudgins
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ D. RAYMOND RIDDLE
D. Raymond Riddle
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ HARRIETT J. ROBINSON
Harriett J. Robinson
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ SCOTT G. THOMPSON
Scott G. Thompson
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ MARK C. WEST
Mark C. West
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ WILLIAM H. WHALEY, M.D.
William H. Whaley, M.D.
Director
March 29, 2004
Table of Contents
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ DOM H. WYANT
Dom H. Wyant
Director
March 29, 2004
/s/ HAROLD K. FISCHER
Harold K. Fischer
Director
March 29, 2004
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF
REGISTRANT
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2003
2002
(In thousands)
ASSETS
$
1,751
$
1,742
147,978
134,511
1,238
542
3,986
1,359
3,210
2,712
$
158,163
$
140,866
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
$
2,463
$
854
12,569
11,430
15,000
32,000
41,238
18,042
71,270
62,326
86,893
78,540
$
158,163
$
140,866
76
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF
REGISTRANT
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(In thousands)
$
7,599
$
6,705
$
5,933
5,728
7,076
7,099
120
217
1,299
13,447
13,998
14,331
12,005
10,162
9,318
3,120
2,564
3,234
(1,678
)
1,272
1,779
4,747
2,690
1,606
3,069
3,962
3,385
3,775
(361
)
212
(15,816
)
$
6,844
$
(12,215
)
$
3,597
(1) | Under the terms of its tax-sharing agreement with its subsidiaries, income tax provisions for the individual companies are computed on a separate company basis. Accordingly, the Companys income tax benefit results from the utilization of the parent company separate return loss to reduce the consolidated taxable income of the Company and its subsidiaries. |
77
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF
REGISTRANT
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(In thousands)
$
6,844
$
(12,215
)
$
3,597
(125
)
(118
)
798
659
631
126
77
45
(3,775
)
16,177
(212
)
(2,627
)
682
(832
)
(1,163
)
(621
)
507
90
549
(296
)
(7
)
149
(46
)
286
5,332
3,276
31
(696
)
(542
)
(128
)
(2,250
)
(8,521
)
(337
)
(335
)
(803
)
(3,283
)
(9,367
)
(931
)
22,520
17,516
(2,000
)
(143
)
(225
)
(225
)
(396
)
(44
)
(11
)
(17,000
)
(12,000
)
(2,500
)
750
25
13
158
3,006
5,260
(1,828
)
9
1,225
517
1,742
517
$
1,751
$
1,742
$
517
$
3,285
$
2,282
$
3,394
$
514
$
113
$
100
78
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
Future Policy
Benefits, Losses,
Other Policy
Deferred
Claims and Loss
Unearned
Claims and
Segment
Acquisition Costs
Reserves
Premiums
Benefits Payable
(In thousands)
$
18,647
$
57,758
$
3,986
$
2,414
3,578
39,042
21,118
2,863
1,847
44,497
12,485
3,924
56,021
23,561
$
27,996
$
197,318
(1)
$
61,150
$
5,277
$
18,934
$
53,656
$
3,566
$
2,395
2,327
44,428
20,519
2,382
1,470
41,669
10,147
3,191
53,705
21,668
$
25,922
$
193,458
(2)
$
55,900
$
4,777
$
18,554
$
51,932
$
3,219
$
2,153
2,024
46,235
18,598
2,151
1,799
38,489
11,590
2,304
51,214
17,618
$
24,681
$
187,870
(3)
$
51,025
$
4,304
(1) | Includes future policy benefits of $47,226 and losses and claims of $150,092. |
(2) | Includes future policy benefits of $44,767 and losses and claims of $148,691. |
(3) | Includes future policy benefits of $44,355 and losses and claims of $143,515. |
79
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
Benefits,
Amortization
Net
Claims, Losses
of Deferred
Other
Casualty
Premium
Investment
and Settlement
Acquisition
Operating
Premiums
Segment
Revenue
Income
Expenses
Costs
Expenses
Written
(In thousands)
$
62,683
$
5,292
$
43,863
$
1,714
$
17,487
$
37,358
4,357
20,977
6,557
6,821
37,958
20,352
2,178
15,245
3,503
4,640
22,269
34,319
3,505
22,258
6,704
7,446
37,272
27
7,860
$
154,712
$
15,359
$
102,343
$
18,478
$
44,254
$
97,499
$
60,597
$
4,664
$
42,404
$
2,152
$
16,655
$
39,914
4,125
26,353
5,595
5,784
41,835
24,244
2,183
20,402
4,159
4,039
22,620
29,744
2,819
19,950
5,704
7,617
34,517
2
6,328
$
154,499
$
13,793
$
109,109
$
17,610
$
40,423
$
98,972
$
55,276
$
4,318
$
39,570
$
2,173
$
15,131
$
39,023
4,590
26,069
4,282
6,632
39,558
25,711
2,591
23,613
5,534
3,446
30,956
25,579
2,639
17,644
4,903
3,862
25,264
3
6,196
$
145,589
$
14,141
$
106,896
$
16,892
$
35,267
$
95,778
80
SCHEDULE IV
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
REINSURANCE
Ceded To
Assumed
Percentage of
Direct
Other
From Other
Net
Amount Assumed
Amount
Companies
Companies
Amounts
To Net
(In thousands)
$
305,793
$
(25,048
)
$
$
280,745
$
62,255
$
(62
)
$
490
$
62,683
0.8
%
35,438
(6,436
)
8,356
37,358
22.4
%
24,515
(4,163
)
20,352
36,807
(17,358
)
14,870
34,319
43.3
%
$
159,015
$
(28,019
)
$
23,716
$
154,712
15.3
%
$
310,874
$
(32,218
)
$
$
278,656
$
60,056
$
(59
)
$
600
$
60,597
1.0
%
27,501
(6,877
)
19,290
39,914
48.3
%
28,230
(3,986
)
24,244
37,851
(18,612
)
10,505
29,744
35.3
%
$
153,638
$
(29,534
)
$
30,395
$
154,499
19.7
%
$
305,952
$
(29,915
)
$
$
276,037
$
54,591
$
(72
)
$
757
$
55,276
1.4
%
24,101
(5,929
)
20,851
39,023
53.4
%
28,626
(2,915
)
25,711
29,746
(10,053
)
5,886
25,579
23.0
%
$
137,064
$
(18,969
)
$
27,494
$
145,589
18.9
%
81
SCHEDULE VI
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CONCERNING
Claims and Claim
Adjustment
Expenses
Paid
Incurred Related to
Amortization
Claims
Deferred
Net
of Deferred
and Claim
Policy
Unearned
Earned
Investment
Current
Prior
Acquisition
Adjustment
Premiums
Year Ended
Acquisition
Reserves
Premium
Premium
Income
Year
Years
Costs
Expenses
Written
(In thousands)
$
9,349
$
139,560
$
57,164
$
92,029
$
10,040
$
57,038
$
1,516
$
16,764
$
61,168
$
97,499
$
6,988
$
139,802
$
52,334
$
93,902
$
9,127
$
67,053
$
(377
)
$
15,458
$
54,463
$
98,972
$
6,127
$
135,938
$
47,806
$
90,313
$
9,757
$
70,250
$
(2,774
)
$
14,719
$
66,665
$
95,778
82
EXHIBIT 14.1
ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORPORATION
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
INTRODUCTION
This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics describes the basic principles of conduct that we share as officers and employees of Atlantic American Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company"). This Code also applies to our directors and should be provided to and followed by our agents and representatives. Violation of this Code may result in disciplinary action, varying from reprimand to dismissal.
This Code is intended to provide a broad overview of basic ethical principles that guide our conduct. In some circumstances, we maintain more specific policies on the topics referred to in this Code. Should you have any questions regarding these policies, please review your Employee Handbook or contact the Company's Human Resources department.
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS
We strive to conduct our business in conformity with the highest ethical standards and in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations of the places where we do business. If a law, rule, or regulation is unclear, or conflicts with a provision of this Code, you should seek advice from your immediate supervisor or from the Human Resources department but always seek to act in accordance with the ethical standards described in this Code.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
We conduct our business affairs in the best interest of our Company and should therefore avoid situations where our private interests interfere in any way with our Company's interests. We need to be especially sensitive to situations that have even the appearance of impropriety and promptly report them to a supervisor or, if appropriate, a more senior manager. If you believe that a transaction, relationship or other circumstance creates or may create a conflict of interest, you should promptly report this concern. A "conflict of interest" can occur when an officer's, employee's or director's personal interest interferes in any way with - or may appear to interfere with - the interests of the Company as a whole. Personal interests may include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable or financial relationships, among others. Conflicts of interest may also arise when an officer, employee or director, or a member of his or her immediate family, receives personal benefits outside of the compensation or reimbursement programs approved by the Board.
It is our policy that circumstances that pose a conflict of interest for our employees are prohibited unless a waiver is obtained through Human Resources. Any waiver of this conflict of interest policy for a director or executive officer may only be made by our Board of Directors (the "Board") and any such waiver will be promptly disclosed to the public.
RECORD-KEEPING
We require honest and accurate recording and reporting of information in order to make responsible business decisions. We document and record our business expenses accurately. Questionable expenses should be discussed with the appropriate personnel in our accounting department.
All of our books, records, accounts, and financial statements are maintained in reasonable detail, appropriately reflect our transactions, and conform both to applicable legal requirements and to our system of internal controls.
We avoid exaggeration, derogatory remarks, guesswork, or inappropriate characterizations of people and companies in our business records and communications.
PUBLIC REPORTING
We are a public company and as a result file reports and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the securities markets on which our securities trade. In addition, we issue press releases and make other public statements that include financial and other information about our business, financial condition and results of operations. We endeavor to make full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents we file with, or submit to, the SEC and in our press releases and public communications.
We require cooperation and open communication with our internal and outside auditors. It is illegal to take any action to fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate, or mislead any internal or external auditor engaged in the performance of an audit of our financial statements.
The laws and regulations applicable to filings made with the SEC, including those applicable to accounting matters, are complex. While the ultimate responsibility for the information included in these reports rests with senior management, numerous other employees
participate in the preparation of these reports or provide information included in these reports. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that the information included in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC is collected and communicated to senior management in order to permit timely disclosure of the required information.
If you are requested to provide, review or certify information in connection with our disclosure controls and procedures, you must provide the requested information or otherwise respond in a full, accurate and timely manner. Moreover, even in the absence of a specific request, you should report to the appropriate Company officer or employee any information that you believe should be considered for disclosure in our reports to the SEC.
If you have questions or are uncertain as to how our disclosure controls and procedures may apply in a specific circumstance, promptly contact your supervisor or a more senior manager. You are encouraged to ask questions and seek advice. Additional information regarding how to report your questions or concerns is included below in this Code under the heading "Reporting Illegal or Unethical Behavior."
INSIDER TRADING
We do not trade in Company stock on the basis of material, non-public information concerning the Company, nor do we "tip" others who may trade in Company securities. For more detailed information on the Company's policies and guidelines relating to the possession and use of material, non-public information concerning the Company and trading in Company securities, please see the Atlantic American Corporation Employee Handbook.
CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES
We do not personally take opportunities that are discovered through the use of Company property, information or position without the prior consent of our Board. Our directors, officers, and employees are also prohibited from competing with the Company.
COMPETITION AND FAIR DEALING
We strive to conduct our business in conformity with the spirit and letter of the law and under the highest ethical standards. We do not engage in unethical or illegal business practices such as stealing proprietary information, possessing trade secret information that was obtained without the owner's consent, or inducing disclosure of this type of information by past or present employees of other companies.
BUSINESS ENTERTAINMENT AND GIFTS
We recognize that business entertainment and gifts are meant to create good will and sound working relationships, not to gain unfair advantage with customers or suppliers. Neither we nor our family members offer, give, or accept any gift or entertainment unless it: (a) is not a cash gift, (b) is consistent with customary business practices, (c) is not excessive in value, (d) cannot be construed as a bribe or payoff, and (e) does not violate any laws or regulations. Any questionable gift or invitation should be discussed with a supervisor, or, if appropriate, a more senior manager.
DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
The diversity of our employees is a tremendous asset. We provide equal opportunity in all aspects of employment and will not tolerate discrimination or harassment of any kind. Derogatory comments based on racial or ethnic characteristics, unwelcome sexual advances and similar behavior are prohibited.
HEALTH AND SAFETY
We strive to provide a safe and healthful work environment. We ensure a safe and healthy work environment by following safety and health rules and practices and promptly reporting accidents, injuries and unsafe equipment, practices, or conditions to a supervisor or more senior manager.
We do not permit violence or threatening behavior in our workplaces. We report to work in condition to perform our duties at our best, free from the influence of illegal drugs or alcohol. We do not tolerate the use of illegal drugs in the workplace.
CONFIDENTIALITY
We protect confidential information. Confidential information includes proprietary information such as our trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights, business and marketing plans, sales forecasts, customer and client data, databases, records, salary information, and unpublished financial data and reports, as well as any non-public information that might be of use to competitors or harmful to us or our customers if disclosed. It also includes information that suppliers and customers have entrusted to us on a confidential basis. Our personal obligation not to disclose confidential information continues even after employment ends.
PROTECTION AND PROPER USE OF COMPANY ASSETS
Theft, carelessness, and waste of Company assets have a direct impact on our profitability and should be avoided. Any suspected incident of fraud or theft should be immediately reported to a supervisor or, if appropriate, a more senior manager for investigation. We carefully safeguard our confidential information. Unauthorized use or distribution of confidential information is prohibited and could also be illegal, resulting in civil or even criminal penalties.
PAYMENTS TO GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL
In compliance with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act we do not give anything of value, directly or indirectly, to officials of foreign governments or foreign political candidates in order to obtain or retain business. We do not promise, offer, or deliver to any foreign or domestic government employee or official any gift, favor, or other gratuity that would be illegal.
WAIVERS
Only our Board may waive a provision of this Code for our executive officers or directors, and any waiver should be appropriately disclosed to the public. Waivers of this Code for any other employee may be made only through Human Resources and then only under special circumstances.
REPORTING ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR
In order to encourage good faith reports of illegal or unethical behavior (including violations of this Code), we keep all reports confidential and do not allow retaliation for reports of misconduct by others. It is also our duty to cooperate in internal investigations of alleged misconduct.
We must all work to ensure prompt and consistent action against unethical or illegal behavior. Oftentimes a violation of this Code will be easy to recognize and should be promptly reported to a supervisor or, if appropriate, a more senior manager. However, in some situations it is difficult to know right from wrong. Since none of us can anticipate every situation that will arise, it is important that we have a way to approach a new or sensitive question or concern. Here are some questions that can be asked:
1. WHAT DO I NEED TO KNOW? In order to reach the right solutions, we must be as fully informed as possible.
2. WHAT SPECIFICALLY AM I BEING ASKED TO DO? DOES IT SEEM UNETHICAL OR IMPROPER? This will focus the inquiry on the specific action in question, and the available alternatives. Use judgment and common sense; if something seems unethical or improper, it probably is.
3. WHAT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY? In most situations, there is shared responsibility. Should colleagues be informed? It may help to get others involved and discuss the issue.
4. HAVE I DISCUSSED THE ISSUE WITH A SUPERVISOR? This is the basic guidance for all situations. In many cases, a supervisor will be more knowledgeable about the question and will appreciate being brought into the decision-making process. Remember that it is the supervisor's responsibility to help solve problems.
5. SHOULD I SEEK HELP FROM COMPANY MANAGEMENT? In the case which it may not be appropriate to discuss an issue with a supervisor, or where you would not be comfortable approaching a supervisor with your question, discuss it with the Human Resources manager. If for some reason you do not believe that your concerns have been appropriately addressed, you should seek advice from a company President or other senior officer. Alternatively, you may make confidential, anonymous submissions of concerns regarding alleged violations of this Code, including concerns with respect to questionable accounting or auditing matters, through procedures established and published by the Company from time to time.
CONCLUSION
The Company's good name and reputation depend, to a very large extent, upon you taking personal responsibility for maintaining and adhering to the policies and guidelines set forth in this Code. Your business conduct on behalf of the Company must be guided by the policies and guidelines set forth in this Code.
* * * * *
This Code will be included on the Company's website and will be made available upon request sent to the Company's Secretary. The Company's annual report to stockholders will state that this Code is available on the Company's website and will be made available without charge and upon request sent to the Company's Secretary.
.
.
.
EXHIBIT 21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
SUBSIDIARY STATE OF FORMATION American Safety Insurance Company Georgia American Southern Insurance Company Kansas Association Casualty Insurance Company Texas Association Risk Management General Agency Texas Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company Georgia Georgia Casualty & Surety Company Georgia Self-Insurance Administrators, Inc. Georgia |
EXHIBIT 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-56866, 333-90063, 333-90057 and 333-97567 of Atlantic American Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated March 26, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Atlantic American Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) the Company's change in its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 and (2) the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Hilton H. Howell, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ Hilton H. Howell, Jr. ---------------------------------------------- Hilton H. Howell, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John G. Sample, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ John G. Sample, Jr. -------------------------------------- John G. Sample, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer's knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
/s/ Hilton H. Howell, Jr. Date: March 29, 2004 ----------------------------------- Hilton H. Howell, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ John G. Sample, Jr. Date: March 29, 2004 ----------------------------------- John G. Sample, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.