UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One) | ||
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2004
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Georgia | 58-0254510 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
2999 Circle 75 Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (770) 953-1700 .
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act and the Exchange on which such securities are registered:
Common Stock, Par Value, $1 Per Share
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as described in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the Registrants Common Stock (based upon the closing sales price reported by the New York Stock Exchange and published in The Wall Street Journal for February 11, 2005) held by non-affiliates as of February 11, 2005 was approximately $ 7,394,717,000 .
The number of shares outstanding of Registrants Common Stock, as of February 11, 2005, was 174,717,403.
Certain portions of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report) are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Other than those portions of the Annual Report specifically incorporated by reference pursuant to Items 5 through 8 and 9A of Part II hereof, no other portions of the Annual Report shall be deemed so incorporated.
Certain portions of the Companys definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 18, 2005 (the Proxy Statement) filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Other than those portions of the Proxy Statement specifically incorporated by reference pursuant to Items 10 through 12 and 14 of Part III hereof, no other portions of the Proxy Statement shall be deemed so incorporated.
PART I .
ITEM 1 . BUSINESS .
Genuine Parts Company, a Georgia corporation incorporated on May 7, 1928, is a service organization engaged in the distribution of automotive replacement parts, industrial replacement parts, office products and electrical/electronic materials. In 2004, business was conducted throughout the United States, in Canada and in Mexico from approximately 1,900 locations. As used in this report, the Company refers to Genuine Parts Company and its subsidiaries, except as otherwise indicated by the context; and the terms automotive parts and industrial parts refer to replacement parts in each respective category.
Financial Information about Segments . For financial information regarding segments, refer to Segment Data set forth on Page 14 and to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 38, both in the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
Competition - General . The distribution business, which includes all segments of the Companys business, is highly competitive with the principal methods of competition being product quality, sufficiency of inventory, price and the ability to give the customer prompt and dependable service. The Company anticipates no decline in competition in any of its business segments in the foreseeable future.
Employees . As of December 31, 2004, the Company employed approximately 31,200 persons.
AUTOMOTIVE PARTS GROUP
The Automotive Parts Group, the largest division of the Company, distributes automotive replacement parts and accessory items. The Company is the largest member of the National Automotive Parts Association (NAPA), a voluntary trade association formed in 1925 to provide nationwide distribution of automotive parts. In addition to over 320,000 available part numbers, the Company, in conjunction with NAPA, offers complete inventory, cataloging, marketing, training and other programs in the automotive aftermarket.
During 2004, the Companys Automotive Parts Group included NAPA automotive parts distribution centers and automotive parts stores (auto parts stores or NAPA AUTO PARTS stores) owned in the United States by the Company; automotive parts distribution centers and auto parts stores in Canada owned and operated by NAPA Canada/UAP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; auto parts stores in the United States operated by corporations in which the Company owned either a minority or majority interest; auto parts stores in Canada operated by corporations in which NAPA Canada/UAP owns a 50% interest; distribution centers owned by Balkamp, Inc. (Balkamp), a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company; rebuilding plants owned by the Company and operated by its Rayloc division; distribution centers of ACDelco, Motorcraft and other automotive supplies owned and operated by Johnson Industries, a wholly-owned subsidiary; and automotive parts distribution centers and automotive parts stores in Mexico, owned and operated by Grupo Auto Todo, S.A. de C.V. (Auto Todo), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
The Company has a 15% interest in Mitchell Repair Information (MRIC), a subsidiary of Snap-on Incorporated. MRIC is a leading diagnostic and repair information company with over 35,000 North American subscribers linked to its services and information databases. MRICs core product, Mitchell ON-DEMAND, is a premier electronic repair information source in the automotive aftermarket.
The Companys NAPA automotive parts distribution centers distribute replacement parts (other than body parts) for substantially all motor vehicle makes and models in service in the United States, including imported vehicles, trucks, SUVs, buses, motorcycles, recreational vehicles and farm vehicles. In addition, the Company distributes replacement parts for small engines, farm equipment and heavy duty equipment. The Companys inventories also include accessory items for such vehicles and equipment, and supply items used by a wide variety of customers in the automotive aftermarket, such as repair shops, service stations, fleet operators, automobile and truck dealers, leasing companies, bus and truck lines, mass merchandisers, farms, industrial concerns and individuals who perform their own maintenance and parts installation. Although the
-2-
Companys domestic automotive operations purchase from more than 80 different suppliers, approximately 51% of 2004 automotive parts inventories were purchased from 10 major suppliers. Since 1931, the Company has had return privileges with most of its suppliers, which has protected the Company from inventory obsolescence.
Distribution System . In 2004, the Company operated 58 domestic NAPA automotive parts distribution centers located in 39 states and approximately 1,000 domestic company-owned NAPA AUTO PARTS stores located in 43 states. At December 31, 2004, Genuine Parts Company owned either a minority or majority interest in 3 corporations, which operated approximately 22 auto parts stores in 3 states.
NAPA Canada/UAP, founded in 1926, is a Canadian leader in the distribution, marketing and rebuilding of replacement parts and accessories for automobiles and trucks. NAPA Canada/UAP employs approximately 4,000 people. NAPA Canada/UAP operates a network of 14 distribution centers supplying approximately 585 NAPA Canada/UAP stores and 72 TRACTION wholesalers, which supply parts to small fleet owners and operators and are a significant supplier to the mining and forestry industries. These include approximately 198 company owned stores, 21 joint venture or progressive owners in which NAPA Canada/UAP owns a 50% interest and approximately 438 independently owned stores. NAPA Canada/UAP supplies bannered installers and independent installers in all provinces of Canada, as well as networks of service station and repair shops operating under the banners of national accounts. NAPA Canada/UAP is licensed to and uses the NAPA® name in Canada.
In Mexico, Auto Todo owns and operates 9 distribution centers and 12 auto parts stores. Auto Todo is licensed to and uses the NAPA® name in Mexico.
The Companys distribution centers serve approximately 4,800 independently owned NAPA AUTO PARTS stores located throughout the market areas served. NAPA AUTO PARTS stores, in turn, sell to a wide variety of customers in the automotive aftermarket. Collectively, these independent automotive parts stores account for approximately 25% of the Companys total sales with no automotive parts store or group of automotive parts stores with individual or common ownership accounting for more than 0.5% of the total sales of the Company.
Products . Distribution centers have access to over 320,000 different parts and related supply items. Each item is cataloged and numbered for identification and accessibility. Significant inventories are carried to provide for fast and frequent deliveries to customers. Most orders are filled and shipped the same day as received. The majority of sales are on terms that require payment within 30 days of the statement date. The Company does not manufacture any of the products it distributes. The majority of products are distributed under the NAPA® name, a mark licensed to the Company by NAPA.
Related Operations . Balkamp distributes a wide variety of replacement parts and accessory items for passenger cars, heavy duty vehicles, motorcycles and farm equipment. In addition, Balkamp distributes service items such as testing equipment, lubricating equipment, gauges, cleaning supplies, chemicals and supply items used by repair shops, fleets, farms and institutions. Balkamp packages many of the approximately 27,000 products which constitute the Balkamp line of products that are distributed to the members of NAPA. These products are categorized in 160 different product groups purchased from more than 400 domestic suppliers and 130 foreign manufacturers. In addition, Balkamp operates two Redistribution Centers that provide NAPA with over 300 SKUs of oils and chemicals. Balkamp also provides mill supplies and related items to the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary Motion Industries, Inc. for sale in its MI Industrial line of merchandise. BALKAMP®, a federally registered trademark, is important to the sales and marketing promotions of the Balkamp organization. Balkamp has four distribution centers located in Indianapolis and Plainfield, Indiana, Greenwood, Mississippi and West Jordan, Utah.
Johnson Industries, Inc. (Johnson), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is an independent distributor of ACDelco, Motorcraft and other automotive supplies. Johnson, founded in 1924, sells primarily to large fleets and new car dealers from a network of distribution centers throughout the U.S.
-3-
The Company, through its Rayloc division, also operates five plants where certain small automotive parts are rebuilt. These products are distributed to the members of NAPA under the NAPA® brand name. Rayloc® is a mark licensed to the Company by NAPA.
Segment Data . In the year ended December 31, 2004, sales from the Automotive Parts Group approximated 52% of the Companys net sales as compared to 53% in 2003 and 52% in 2002.
Service to NAPA AUTO PARTS Stores . The Company believes that the quality and the range of services provided to its automotive parts customers constitute a significant advantage for its automotive parts distribution system. Such services include fast and frequent delivery, obsolescence protection, parts cataloging (including the use of computerized NAPA AUTO PARTS catalogs) and stock adjustment through a continuing parts classification system which allows independent retailers (jobbers) to return certain merchandise on a scheduled basis. The Company offers its NAPA AUTO PARTS store customers various management aids, marketing aids and service on topics such as inventory control, cost analysis, accounting procedures, group insurance and retirement benefit plans, marketing conferences and seminars, sales and advertising manuals and training programs. Point of sale/inventory management is available through TAMS® (Total Automotive Management Systems), a computer system designed and developed by the Company for the NAPA AUTO PARTS store.
In association with NAPA, the Company has developed and refined an inventory classification system to determine optimum distribution center and auto parts store inventory levels for automotive parts stocking based on automotive registrations, usage rates, production statistics, technological advances and other similar factors. This system, which undergoes continuous analytical review, is an integral part of the Companys inventory control procedures and comprises an important feature of the inventory management services that the Company makes available to its NAPA AUTO PARTS store customers. Over the last 10 years, losses to the Company from obsolescence have been insignificant and the Company attributes this to the successful operation of its classification system, which involves product return privileges with most of its suppliers.
Competition . In the distribution of automotive parts, the Company competes with automobile manufacturers (some of which sell replacement parts for vehicles built by other manufacturers as well as those which they build themselves), automobile dealers, warehouse clubs and large automotive parts retail chains. In addition, the Company competes with the distributing outlets of parts manufacturers, oil companies, mass merchandisers, including national retail chains, and with other parts distributors and retailers.
NAPA . The Company is a member of the National Automotive Parts Association, a voluntary association formed in 1925 to provide nationwide distribution of automotive replacement parts. NAPA, which neither buys nor sells automotive parts, functions as a trade association whose members in 2004 operated 64 distribution centers located throughout the United States, 58 of which were owned and operated by the Company. NAPA develops marketing concepts and programs that may be used by its members. It is not involved in the chain of distribution.
Among the automotive lines that each NAPA member purchases and distributes are certain lines designated, cataloged, advertised and promoted as NAPA lines. The members are not required to purchase any specific quantity of parts so designated and may, and do, purchase competitive lines from other supply sources.
The Company and the other NAPA members use the federally registered trademark NAPA® as part of the trade name of their distribution centers and parts stores. The Company contributes to NAPAs national advertising program, which is designed to increase public recognition of the NAPA name and to promote NAPA product lines.
The Company is a party, together with other members of NAPA and NAPA itself, to a consent decree entered by the Federal District Court in Detroit, Michigan, on May 4, 1954. The consent decree enjoins certain practices under the federal antitrust laws, including the use of exclusive agreements with manufacturers of automotive parts, allocation or division of territories among several NAPA members, fixing of prices or
-4-
terms of sale for such parts among such members, and agreements to adhere to any uniform policy in selecting parts customers or determining the number and location of, or arrangements with, auto parts customers.
INDUSTRIAL PARTS GROUP
The Industrial Parts Group distributes industrial replacement parts and related supplies throughout the United States and Canada. This group distributes industrial bearings and power transmission equipment replacement parts, including hydraulic and pneumatic products, material handling components, related supplies and repair services. The Industrial Parts Group continues to enhance communication and process activities through three distinct programs. These programs include: MotionMRO.com, an internet-based procurement system; MiSupplierConnect, a manufacturer communication and fulfillment system; and inMotion, an internal employee communication source and operational reporting system.
The Company distributes industrial parts in the United States through Motion Industries, Inc. (Motion), headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. Motion is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In Canada, industrial parts are distributed by Motion Industries (Canada), Inc. (Motion Canada), an operating group in the Companys North American structure.
As of December 31, 2004, the Industrial Parts Group served more than 150,000 customers in all types of industries located throughout the United States and Canada including automotive, chemical, food and beverage, wood and lumber, iron and steel, pulp and paper, and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Distribution System . In North America, the Industrial Parts Group operates 418 branches, nine distribution centers and 34 service centers. The distribution centers stock and distribute more than 200,000 different items purchased from more than 250 different suppliers. The service centers provide hydraulic, hose and mechanical repairs for customers. Approximately 33% of 2004 total industrial purchases were made from 10 major suppliers. Sales are generated from the Industrial Parts Groups branches located in 48 states and nine provinces in Canada. Each branch has warehouse facilities that stock significant amounts of inventory representative of the lines of products used by customers in the respective market area served.
Motion Canada operates two distribution centers for the 44 Canadian branches serving industrial and agricultural markets.
Products . The Industrial Parts Group distributes a wide variety of products to its customers, primarily industrial concerns, to maintain and operate plants, machinery and equipment. Products include such items as hoses, belts, bearings, pulleys, pumps, valves, chains, gears, sprockets, speed reducers and electric motors. The nature of this groups business demands the maintenance of large inventories and the ability to provide prompt and demanding delivery requirements. Virtually all of the products distributed are installed by the customer. Most orders are filled immediately from existing stock and deliveries are normally made within 24 hours of receipt of order. The majority of all sales are on open account.
Supply Agreements . Non-exclusive distributor agreements are in effect with most of the Industrial Parts Groups suppliers. The terms of these agreements vary; however, it has been the experience of the Industrial Parts Group that the custom of the trade is to treat such agreements as continuing until breached by one party or until terminated by mutual consent. The Company has return privileges with most of its suppliers, which has protected the Company from inventory obsolescence.
Segment Data . In the year ended December 31, 2004, sales from the Companys Industrial Parts Group remained constant at approximately 27% of the Companys net sales, the same as in 2003 and 2002.
Competition . The Industrial Parts Group competes with other distributors specializing in the distribution of such items, general line distributors and others who provide similar services. To a lesser extent, the Group competes with manufacturers that sell directly to the customer.
-5-
OFFICE PRODUCTS GROUP
The Office Products Group, operated through S. P. Richards Company (S. P. Richards), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. S. P. Richards is engaged in the wholesale distribution of a broad line of office and other business related products that are used in the daily operation of businesses, schools, offices and institutions. Office products fall into the general categories of computer supplies, imaging supplies, office furniture, office machines, general office supplies, school supplies, cleaning and breakroom supplies, and healthcare supplies.
HorizonUSA Data Supplies, Inc. (HorizonUSA), a wholly-owned subsidiary of S. P. Richards, is headquartered in Reno, Nevada. HorizonUSA is a distributor of computer supplies and accessories.
The Office Products Group is represented in Canada through S. P. Richards Canada. Headquartered near Vancouver, British Columbia, S. P. Richards Canada services office product resellers throughout Canada from locations in Vancouver, Toronto, Calgary and Winnipeg.
Distribution System . The Office Products Group distributes more than 30,000 items to over 7,000 business product resellers throughout the United States and Canada from a network of 44 distribution centers. This network of strategically located distribution centers provides overnight delivery of the Companys comprehensive product offering. Approximately 48% of the Companys 2004 total office products purchases were made from 10 major suppliers.
The Office Products Group sells strictly to resellers of office products. These resellers include independently owned office product dealers, national office product superstores, large contract stationers, mail order companies and college bookstores. Resellers are offered comprehensive marketing programs, which include full line catalogs and flyers as well as education and training resources.
Products . The Office Products Group distributes computer supplies including storage media, printer supplies and computer accessories; office furniture including desks, credenzas, chairs, chair mats, partitions, files and computer furniture; office machines including telephones, answering machines, calculators, fax machines, multi-function copiers, printers, digital cameras, laminators and shredders; general office supplies including desk accessories, business forms, accounting supplies, binders, filing supplies, report covers, writing instruments, envelopes, note pads, copy paper, mailroom supplies, drafting supplies and audiovisual supplies; school supplies including bulletin boards, teaching aids and art supplies; janitorial supplies including cleaning supplies, paper towels and trash can liners; and breakroom supplies including napkins, utensils, snacks and beverages. S. P. Richards has return privileges with most of its suppliers, which has protected the Company from inventory obsolescence.
While the Company inventories include products from over 350 of the industrys leading manufacturers worldwide, S. P. Richards also markets six proprietary brands of items. These brands include: SPARCO®, an economical line of office supply basics; Compucessory, a line of computer accessories; Lorell, a line of office furniture; NATURE SAVER®, an offering of recycled paper products; Elite Image, a line of new and remanufactured toner cartridges; and Integra, a line of writing instruments.
Segment Data . In the year ended December 31, 2004, sales from the Companys Office Products Group remained constant at approximately 17% of the Companys net sales, the same as in 2003 and 2002.
Competition . In the distribution of office supplies to retail dealers, S. P. Richards competes with many other wholesale distributors as well as with certain manufacturers of office products.
ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC MATERIALS GROUP
The Electrical/Electronic Materials Group was formed on July 1, 1998 through the acquisition of EIS, Inc. (EIS) headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. This Group distributes materials to more than 20,000 electrical and electronic manufacturers in North America. With branches in 34 locations nationwide and in
-6-
Mexico, this Group distributes over 100,000 items, from insulating and conductive materials to assembly tools and test equipment. This Group also has three manufacturing facilities that provide custom fabricated parts.
Distribution System . The Electrical/Electronic Materials Group is an important single source to original equipment manufacturers, repair shops, the electronic assembly market and printed circuit board manufacturers. EIS actively utilizes its E-commerce Internet site to present its products to customers while allowing these on-line visitors to conveniently purchase from a large product assortment.
Electronic materials are distributed through EISs operating divisions, Electronic Assembly and Circuit Supply. Both electrical and electronic products are distributed from warehouse locations in major user markets throughout the U.S. The Company has return privileges with some of its suppliers, which has protected the Company from inventory obsolescence.
Products . The Electrical/Electronic Materials Group distributes a wide variety of products to customers from over 350 vendors. Products include such items as magnet wire, copper clad laminate, conductive materials, insulating and shielding materials, assembly tools, test equipment, adhesives and chemicals, pressure sensitive tapes, solder, anti-static products and thermal management products. To meet the prompt delivery demands of its customers, this Group maintains large inventories. The majority of sales are on open account. Approximately 39% of 2004 total Electrical/Electronic Materials Group purchases were made from 10 major suppliers.
Integrated Supply . The Electrical/Electronic Materials Groups integrated supply programs are a part of the marketing strategy, as a greater number of customersespecially national accountsare given the opportunity to participate in this low-cost, high-service capability. The Group developed AIMS (Advanced Inventory Management System), a totally integrated, highly automated solution for inventory management. The Groups Integrated Supply offering also includes SupplyPro, an electronic vending dispenser used to eliminate costly tool cribs, or in-house stores, at customer warehouse facilities.
Segment Data . In the year ended December 31, 2004 sales from the Companys Electrical/Electronic Materials Group approximated 4% of the Companys sales, as compared to 3% in 2003 and 4% in 2002.
Competition . The Electrical/Electronic Materials Group competes with other distributors specializing in the distribution of electrical and electronic products, general line distributors and, to a lesser extent, manufacturers that sell directly to customers.
* * * * * * * * * *
-7-
Internet Website . The Companys internet website can be found at www.genpt.com. The Company makes available free of charge on or through its internet website, access to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Executive Officers of the Company
. The table below sets forth the name and age of each
person deemed to be an executive officer of the Company as of February 21, 2005, the position or
office held by each and the period during which each has served as such. Each executive officer is
elected by the Board of Directors and serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors until his
successor has been elected and has qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation, removal,
retirement or disqualification.
Year First
Name
Age
Position of Office
Assumed Position
66
Chairman of the Executive Committee
1990
57
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
1990/2004
59
Executive Vice President Finance *
2000
59
Executive Vice President
2003
58
Senior Vice President-Human Resources
2004
* | Also serves as the Companys Chief Financial Officer. |
All executive officers have been employed by and have served as officers of the Company for at least the last five years.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this report constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions that its forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The Company undertakes no duty to update its forward-looking statements, which reflect the Companys beliefs, expectations and plans as of the present. Actual results or events may differ materially from those indicated as a result of various important factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in general economic conditions, the growth rate of the market for the Companys products and services, the ability to maintain favorable supplier arrangements and relationships, competitive product and pricing pressures, including internet related initiatives, the effectiveness of the Companys promotional, marketing and advertising programs, changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting and taxation guidance, the uncertainties of litigation, as well as other risks and uncertainties discussed from time to time in the Companys filings with the SEC. Some of these factors that may affect us are described in greater detail in Risk Factors below. Readers are cautioned that other factors not listed here or in our SEC filings could materially impact the Companys future earnings, financial position and cash flows. You should not place undue reliance upon forward-looking statements contained herein and should carefully read other reports that the Company will, from time to time, file with the SEC.
Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Company
We Depend on Our Relationships with Our Vendors.
As a distributor of automotive replacement parts, industrial parts, office products and electrical/electronic materials, our business is dependent on developing and maintaining close and productive relationships with our vendors. We depend on our vendors to sell us quality products at favorable prices. Many factors outside our control may harm these relationships. For example, financial or operational difficulties with a vendor could cause that vendor to increase the cost of the products we purchase from it. Vendor consolidation could also limit the number of suppliers from which we may purchase products and could materially affect the prices we pay for these products. Also, consolidation among automotive parts or industrial parts and office product suppliers could disrupt our relationship with some vendors. A disruption of our vendor relationships or a
-8-
disruption in our vendors operations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our Business and Results of Operations Could Be Impacted by Certain Laws.
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the operation of our business, such as laws and regulations relating to environmental and employment matters. Because such laws and regulations are subject to change without notice, we cannot anticipate the potential costs of compliance. On the other hand, if we fail to comply with existing or future laws or regulations, we may be subject to governmental or judicial fines or sanctions. There can be no assurance that the cost of compliance, or a material failure by us to comply, with these laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on us in the future.
Risks Relating to Our Industry
We Face Substantial Competition in the Industries in Which We Do Business.
The industries in which we do business are highly competitive. The sale of automotive and industrial parts, office products and electronic materials is highly competitive in many areas, including name recognition, product availability, customer service, anticipating changing customer preferences, store location and price. Increased competition among distributors of automotive and industrial parts, office products and electronic materials could cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In particular, the market for replacement automotive parts is highly competitive and subjects us to a wide variety of competitors. We compete primarily with national and regional auto parts chains, independently owned automotive parts and accessories stores, automobile dealers that supply manufacturer replacement parts and accessories, mass merchandisers and wholesale clubs that sell automotive products and regional and local full service automotive repair shops. If we are unable to continue to develop successful competitive strategies, or if our competitors develop more effective strategies, we could lose customers and our sales and profits may decline.
Our Business May Be Materially Affected If Demand For Our Products Slows.
Our business depends on customer demand for the products that we distribute. Demand for these products depends on many factors. With respect to our automotive group, the primary factors are: the number of miles vehicles are driven annually, as higher vehicle mileage increases the need for maintenance and repair; the quality of the vehicles manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers and the length of the warranty or maintenance offered on new vehicles; the number of vehicles in current service that are six years old and older, as these vehicles are no longer under the original vehicle manufacturers warranty and will need more maintenance and repair than newer vehicles; restrictions on access to diagnostic tools and repair information imposed by the original vehicle manufacturers or by governmental regulation; and the economy generally.
Our Business May Be Impacted by General Economic Conditions and Local, National and Global Events.
Our business and results of operations also may be impacted by general economic conditions, conditions in local markets or other factors that we cannot control, including: job growth and unemployment conditions, industrial output and capacity and capital expenditures, reduction in manufacturing capacity in our targeted geographic markets due to consolidation and the transfer of manufacturing capacity to foreign countries, weather, terrorist acts, pricing pressures of our competitors and customers, shortages of fuel or interruptions in transportation systems, labor strikes, work stoppages, or other interruptions to or difficulties in the employment of labor in the major markets where we operate, changes in interest rates, inflation or currency exchange rates, changes in accounting policies and practices and changes in regulatory policies and practices.
-9-
ITEM 2 . PROPERTIES .
The Companys headquarters and Automotive Parts Group headquarters are located in two adjacent office buildings owned by the Company in Atlanta, Georgia.
The Companys Automotive Parts Group currently operates 58 NAPA Distribution Centers in the United States distributed among four geographic divisions. Approximately 90% of the distribution center properties are owned by the Company. At December 31, 2004, the Company operated approximately 1,000 NAPA AUTO PARTS stores located in 43 states, and the Company owned either a minority or majority interest in approximately 22 additional auto parts stores located in 3 states. Other than NAPA AUTO PARTS stores located within Company owned distribution centers, most of the automotive parts stores in which the Company has an ownership interest were operated in leased facilities. In addition, NAPA Canada/UAP operated 14 distribution centers and approximately 219 automotive parts and TRACTION stores in Canada, and Auto Todo operates 9 distribution centers and 12 stores in Mexico. The Companys Automotive Parts Group also operates four Balkamp distribution centers, five Rayloc rebuilding plants, one transfer and shipping facility and twelve Johnson Industries distribution centers.
The Companys Industrial Parts Group, operating through Motion and Motion Canada, operates 9 distribution centers, 34 service centers and 418 branches. Approximately 90% of these branches are operated in leased facilities.
The Companys Office Products Group operates 40 facilities in the United States and 4 facilities in Canada distributed among the Groups four geographic divisions. Approximately 75% of these facilities are operated in leased buildings.
The Companys Electrical/Electronic Materials Group operates in 31 locations in the United States and 3 cities in Mexico. All of this Groups 34 facilities are operated in leased buildings except one facility, which is owned.
For additional information regarding rental expense on leased properties, see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Page 32 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004.
ITEM 3 . LEGAL PROCEEDINGS .
The Company is subject to various legal and governmental proceedings, many involving routine litigation incidental to the businesses, including approximately 1,200 product liability lawsuits resulting from its national distribution of automotive parts and supplies. Many of these involve claims of personal injury allegedly resulting from the use of automotive parts distributed by the Company. While litigation of any type contains an element of uncertainty, the Company believes that its defense and ultimate resolution of pending and reasonably anticipated claims will continue to occur within the ordinary course of the Companys business and that resolution of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations or consolidated business and financial condition.
ITEM 4 . SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS .
Not applicable.
PART II .
Information required by this item is set forth under the heading Market and Dividend
Information on Page 13 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December
31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
-10-
ITEM 5
.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
.
The following table provides information about the purchases of shares of the Companys common stock during the three month period ended December 31, 2004:
Total Number of | Maximum Number of | |||||||||||||||
Total | Shares Purchased as | Shares That May Yet | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Part of Publicly | Be | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans or | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Per Share | Programs | Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
October, 2004
(October 1, 2004
through October 31,
2004)
|
-0- | | | 6,068,593 | ||||||||||||
November, 2004
(November 1, 2004
through November
30, 2004)
|
3,150 | $ | 40.79 | 3,150 | 6,065,443 | |||||||||||
December, 2004
(December 1, 2004
through December
31, 2004)
|
25,000 | $ | 42.36 | 25,000 | 6,040,443 | |||||||||||
Totals
|
28,150 | $ | 42.18 | 28,150 | 6,040,443 | |||||||||||
On April 19, 1999, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 15 million shares, and such repurchase plan was announced April 20, 1999. The authorization for this repurchase plan continues until all such shares have been repurchased, or the repurchase plan is terminated by action of the Board of Directors. There were no other publicly announced plans outstanding as of December 31, 2004. All shares repurchased as discussed in the table above were repurchased pursuant to the Companys publicly announced repurchase plan.
ITEM 6 . SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA .
Information required by this item is set forth under the heading Selected Financial Data on Page 13 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7 . MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS .
Information required by this item is set forth under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on Pages 15 through 20 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7A . QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK .
Information related to this item is set forth under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on Pages 15 through 20 and in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Page 32 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8 . FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA .
Information required by this item is set forth in the consolidated financial statements on Pages 14 and 23 through 38, in Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Financial Statements on
-11-
Page 22 and under the heading Quarterly Results of Operations on Page 20 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A . CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES .
Managements conclusion on the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements report on internal control over financial reporting
Information required by this item is set forth under the heading Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on Page 21 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included on Page 22 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Other control matters
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the Companys fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART III .
ITEM 10 . DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT .
Information required by this item is set forth under the headings Nominees for Director and Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in Office on Pages 6 and 4, under the heading Corporate Governance - Code of Conduct and Ethics on Page 6, under the heading Corporate Governance - Board Committees on Pages 7 and 8, and under the heading Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance on Page 24 of the definitive proxy statement for the Companys Annual Meeting to be held on April 18, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. Certain information required by this Item is included in and incorporated by reference to Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
-12-
ITEM 11 . EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION .
Information required by this item is set forth under the heading Corporate Governance Compensation of Directors on Page 8, Executive Compensation and Other Benefits on Pages 12 through 16, Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation on Page 18 and Change of Control and Employment Termination Arrangements on Pages 18 and 19 of the definitive proxy statement for the Companys Annual Meeting to be held on April 18, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall the information contained in the definitive proxy statement for the Companys 2005 Annual Meeting on Pages 16 through 18 under the heading Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee Report on Executive Compensation; on Pages 20 and 21 under the heading Performance Graph; or on Pages 22 and 23 under the heading Audit Committee Report be incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12 . SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT .
Information required by this item is set forth under the headings Common Stock Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Common Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers on
Pages 9 through 12 of the definitive proxy statement for the Companys Annual Meeting to be held on
April 18, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table gives information as of December 31, 2004 about the common stock that may
be issued under all of the Companys existing equity compensation plans.
(a)
Number of
Securities to
(c)
be Issued Upon
Number of Securities
Exercise
(b)
Remaining Available for
of Outstanding
Weighted Average
Future Issuance Under
Options,
Exercise Price of
Equity Compensation
Warrants and Rights
Outstanding Options,
Plans (Excluding Securities
Plan Category
(1)
Warrants and Rights
Reflected in Column (a))
1,006,625
(2)
$
31.57
-0-
4,751,895
(3)
$
30.50
2,689,134
(5)
30,296
(4)
n/a
960,284
5,788,816
3,649,418
(1) | This table does not include information for the EIS, Inc. 1993 Equity Incentive Plan assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of EIS, Inc. in 1998. As of December 31, 2004, a total of 12,393 shares of the Companys common stock were issuable upon exercise of outstanding options under that assumed plan. The weighted average exercise price of those outstanding options is $18.47 per share. No additional options may be granted under the EIS, Inc. 1993 Equity Incentive Plan. | |
(2) | Genuine Parts Company 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended | |
(3) | Genuine Parts Company 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended | |
(4) | Genuine Parts Company Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended | |
(5) | Includes up to 900,000 shares that may be granted as awards of restricted stock or unrestricted stock. |
-13-
ITEM 13 . CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS .
Not applicable.
ITEM 14 . PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES .
Information required by this item is set forth under the heading Proposal 2. Ratification of Selection of Auditors on Pages 21 and 22 of the definitive proxy statement for the Companys Annual Meeting to be held on April 18, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV .
ITEM 15 . EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES .
(a) Documents filed as part of this report
(1) and (2) The financial statements and financial statement schedule filed as part of this report are is submitted as a separate section of this report following the Index of Financial Statements.
(3) Exhibits. The exhibits filed as part of this report are listed in Item 15(c) below.
(c) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated
November 15, 2004. (Incorporated herein by reference from the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 16,
2004.)
By-laws of the Company, as amended February 19, 2001.
(Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K, dated March 12, 2001.)
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1, Registration No. 33-63874.)
Note Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2001.
(Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K, dated March 7, 2002.)
Instruments with respect to long-term debt where the total amount of securities authorized
thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries
on a consolidated basis have not been filed. The Registrant agrees to furnish to the
Commission a copy of each such instrument upon request.
Form of Amendment to Deferred Compensation Agreement,
adopted February 13, 1989, between the Company and certain
executive officers of the Company. (Incorporated herein
by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K, dated March 15, 1989.)
Form of Agreement adopted February 13, 1989, between the
Company and certain executive officers of the Company
providing for a supplemental employee benefit upon a
change in control of the Company. (Incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K,
dated March 15, 1989.)
-14-
Exhibit 10.3 *
|
1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, effective April 20, 1992. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Meeting Proxy Statement, dated March 6, 1992.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.4 *
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated March 31, 1994, between the Company and Larry L. Prince. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Form 10-Q, dated May 6, 1994.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.5 *
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated March 31, 1994, between the Company and Thomas C. Gallagher. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Form 10-Q, dated May 6, 1994.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.6 *
|
The Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, effective January 1, 1993. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 3, 1995.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.7*
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated June 1, 1996, effective June 1, 1996. | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.8 *
|
Genuine Parts Company Death Benefit Plan, effective July 15, 1997. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 10, 1998.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.9 *
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 25, 1999, between the Company and Larry L. Prince. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Form 10-Q, dated May 3, 1999.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.10 *
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 25, 1999, between the Company and Thomas C. Gallagher. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Form 10-Q, dated May 3, 1999.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.11 *
|
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, dated April 19, 1999, effective April 19, 1999. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 10, 2000.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.12 *
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated April 19, 1999, effective April 19, 1999. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 10, 2000.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.13*
|
The Genuine Parts Company Original Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of August 19, 1996. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 8, 2004.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.14 *
|
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company Original Deferred Compensation Plan, dated April 19, 1999, effective April 19, 1999. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 10, 2000.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.15*
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated November 28, 2001, effective July 1, 2001. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 7, 2002.) |
-15-
Exhibit 10.16*
|
Trust Agreement Executed in Conjunction with the Genuine Parts Company Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated July 1, 2001, effective July 1, 2001. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 7, 2002.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.17*
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Trust Agreement Executed in Conjunction with the Genuine Parts Company Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans, dated December 5, 2001, effective July 1, 2001. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 7, 2002.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.18*
|
Genuine Parts Company 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 19, 2001. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 21 , 2003.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.19*
|
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, dated November 19, 2001, effective November 19, 2001. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 21 , 2003.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.20*
|
Genuine Parts Company Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003, and executed October 22, 2003. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 8, 2004.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.21*
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Genuine Parts Company Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated October 27, 2003, effective January 1, 2003. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 8, 2004.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.22*
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated June 5, 2003, effective June 5, 2003. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 8, 2004.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.23*
|
Genuine Parts Company Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003, and executed November 11, 2003. (Incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 8, 2004.) | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.24 *
|
Genuine Parts Company 2004 Annual Incentive Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2004. | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.25*
|
Description of Director Compensation | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.26*
|
Genuine Parts Company Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.27*
|
Genuine Parts Company Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement | |
|
||
Exhibit 10.28*
|
Genuine Parts Company Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement |
* | Indicates management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements. |
-16-
Exhibit 13
|
The following sections and pages of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004: | |
|
||
|
- Selected Financial Data on Page 13 | |
|
- Market and Dividend Information on Page 13 | |
|
- Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition on Pages 15-20 | |
|
- Quarterly Results of Operations on Page 20 | |
|
- Segment Data on Page 14 | |
|
- Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on Page 21 | |
|
- Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on Page 22 | |
|
- Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Financial Statements on Page 22 | |
|
- Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Pages 23-38 | |
|
||
Exhibit 21
|
Subsidiaries of the Company | |
|
||
Exhibit 23
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
|
||
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification signed by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a). | |
|
||
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification signed by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a). | |
|
||
Exhibit 32.1
|
Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Genuine Parts Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
||
Exhibit 32.2
|
Statement of Chief Financial Officer of Genuine Parts Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(d) Financial Statement Schedules. See the response to Item 15(a)(2) above.
-17-
SIGNATURES
.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
Item 15(a)(1) and (2), (c) and (d)
Index of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Certain Exhibits
Year Ended December 31, 2004
Genuine Parts Company
Atlanta, Georgia
Form 10-K - Item 15(a)(1) and (2)
Genuine Parts Company and Subsidiaries
Index of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
The following consolidated financial statements of Genuine Parts Company and subsidiaries,
included in the annual report of the registrant to its shareholders for the year ended December 31,
2004, are incorporated by reference in Item 8:
Consolidated
balance sheets - December 31, 2004 and 2003
Consolidated
statements of income - Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Consolidated
statements of shareholders equity Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002
Consolidated
statements of cash flows - Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Notes
to consolidated financial statements - December 31, 2004
The following consolidated financial statement schedule of Genuine Parts Company and subsidiaries
is filed pursuant to Item 15(d):
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the
Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are
inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Item 15(c)
The following Exhibits are filed as a part of this Report:
The following Exhibits are incorporated by reference as set forth in Item 15 of this Form 10-K:
Instruments with respect to long-term debt where the total amount of securities authorized
thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on
a consolidated basis have not been filed. The Registrant agrees to furnish to the
Commission a copy of each such instrument upon request.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
3/7/05
/s/ Jerry W. Nix
3/7/05
(Date)
Jerry W. Nix
(Date)
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Executive Vice
President - Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Table of Contents
2/21/05
/s/ Richard W. Courts II
2/21/05
(Date)
Richard W. Courts II
(Date)
Director
2/21/05
/s/ Thomas C. Gallagher
2/21/05
(Date)
Thomas C. Gallagher
(Date)
Director
2/21/05
/s/ Michael M. E. Johns
2/21/05
(Date)
Michael M. E. Johns
(Date)
Director
2/21/05
/s/ Wendy B. Needham
2/21/05
(Date)
Wendy B. Needham
(Date)
Director
2/21/05
/s/ Lawrence G. Steiner
2/21/05
(Date)
Lawrence G. Steiner
(Date)
Director
2/21/05
(Date)
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Amendment No. 1 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated June 1,
1996, effective June 1, 1996.
Genuine Parts Company 2004 Annual Incentive Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2004
Description of Director Compensation
Genuine Parts Company Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
Genuine Parts Company Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement
Genuine Parts Company Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
The following Sections and Pages of Annual Report to Shareholders for 2004:
-
Selected Financial Data on Page 13
-
Market and Dividend Information on Page 13
-
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition on Pages 15-20
-
Quarterly Results of Operations on Page 20
-
Segment Data on Page 14
-
Managements Report on Internal Control on Financial Reporting on Page 21
-
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on Page 22
-
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Financial Statements on Page 22
-
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Pages 23-38
Subsidiaries of the Company
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification signed by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a).
Certification signed by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a).
Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Genuine Parts Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Statement of Chief Financial Officer of Genuine Parts Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
-
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated November 15, 2004.
-
3.2 By-laws of the Company, as amended February 19, 2001.
-
4.2 Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
-
4.3 Note Purchase Agreement dated November 30, 2001.
Table of Contents
Form of Amendment to Deferred Compensation Agreement adopted February 13, 1989, between the Company and
certain executive officers of the Company.
Form of Agreement adopted February 13, 1989, between the Company and certain executive officers of the
Company providing for a supplemental employee benefit upon a change in control of the Company.
1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, effective April 20, 1992.
Restricted Stock Agreement dated March 31, 1994, between the Company and Larry L. Prince.
Restricted Stock Agreement dated March 31, 1994, between the Company and Thomas C. Gallagher.
The Genuine Parts Company Restated Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, effective January 1, 1993.
Genuine Parts Company Death Benefit Plan, effective July 15, 1997.
Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 25, 1999, between the Company and Larry L. Prince.
Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 25, 1999, between the Company and Thomas C. Gallagher.
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, dated April 19, 1999,
effective April 19, 1999.
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated April 19, 1999, effective April
19, 1999.
The Genuine Parts Company Original Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of August 19,
1996.
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company Original Deferred Compensation Plan, dated April 19, 1999,
effective April 19, 1999.
Amendment No. 3 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated November 28, 2001,
effective July 1, 2001.
Trust Agreement Executed in Conjunction with the Genuine Parts Company Supplemental Retirement Plan,
dated July 1, 2001, effective July 1, 2001.
Amendment No. 1 to the Trust Agreement Executed in Conjunction with the Genuine Parts Company
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans, dated December 5, 2001, effective July 1, 2001.
Genuine Parts Company 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 19, 2001.
Amendment to the Genuine Parts Company 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, dated November 19, 2001,
effective November 19, 2001.
Genuine Parts Company Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003,
and executed October 22, 2003.
Amendment No. 1 to the Genuine Parts Company Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated October 27, 2003,
effective January 1, 2003.
Amendment No. 4 to the Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, dated June 5, 2003, effective
June 5, 2003.
Genuine Parts Company Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1,
2003, and executed November 11, 2003.
Table of Contents
Item 15(d)
Financial Statement Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Genuine Parts Company and Subsidiaries
Balance at
Charged
Balance at
Beginning
to Costs
End
of Period
and Expenses
Deductions
of Period
$
9,264,269
$
20,856,135
$(21,892,433)
1
$
8,227,971
$
17,900,000
$ (9,900,000)
2
$
8,000,000
$
8,227,971
$
23,783,043
$(23,459,723)
1
$
8,551,291
$
8,000,000
$ (4,700,000)
2
$
3,300,000
$
8,551,291
$
20,697,493
$(16,455,978)
1
$
12,792,806
$
3,300,000
$ (1,000,000)
2
$
2,300,000
1
Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
2
Facility consolidation expenses paid.
EXHIBIT 10.7
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
TAX-DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN
This Amendment to The Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan is adopted by Genuine Parts Company (the Company), effective as of the date set forth herein.
W I T N E S S E T H :
WHEREAS, the Company maintains The Genuine Parts Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (the Plan), and such Plan is currently in effect; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires that the Plan allow Participants to request the Trustee to invest their Accounts in specified percentages among the various mutual funds selected by the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide for daily valuation of Participants Accounts; and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to make other changes to the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.
Section 4.02 is deleted in its entirety and a new Section 4.02 is substituted in lieu thereof to read as follows:
Section 4.02 Investment .
(a) Each Participant may request the Trustee (following such procedures as may be specified by the Committee) to allocate or reallocate such Participants Account among the investment alternatives that are made available from time to time, in 10% increments; provided that such increments shall always add up to 100%.
(b) An investment request, if approved by the Trustee, shall be effective as soon as administratively feasible following the date the investment request is delivered to the Committee.
(c) A Participants initial investment request shall allocate his entire Account, together with all subsequent contributions to the Account, among the investment alternatives, for so long as such election remains in effect.
(d) Investment requests approved by the Trustee shall remain in effect until the Trustee approves new investment requests. New requests may be made on any business day of the year in the same manner as set forth in Section 4.02(a). New requests shall allocate the Participants Account among the investment alternatives for existing Account balances, future contributions, or both.
(e) If a Participant fails to allocate or reallocate his Account balance among the investment alternatives in an amount equal to 100%, then upon the Trustees approval of the investment request, the Participant shall be deemed to have requested that his Account (or
relevant portion thereof) shall be invested in the investment alternative that, in the Trustees determination, best preserves the principal amount of the Participants Account.
(f) The Committee shall select such investment alternatives as are deemed appropriate and shall notify affected Participants of such investment alternatives. The Committee may modify, eliminate, or select new investment alternatives from time to time and shall notify affected Participants of such changes and solicit new investment requests, if appropriate.
(g) The Committee shall credit each Participants Account with earnings, losses and changes in fair market value experienced by the investment alternatives on each business day that Plan assets are traded on a national exchange, or such other day as selected by the Committee.
2.
This Amendment shall be effective June 1, 1996. Except as amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Genuine Parts Company has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed on the date shown below, but effective as of the date indicated above.
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY | ||||||
|
||||||
|
By: | |||||
|
||||||
|
Date: | |||||
Attest:
|
||||||
|
||||||
EXHIBIT 10.24
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
2004 ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN
ARTICLE 1
ESTABLISHMENT OF PLAN
1.1 BACKGROUND OF PLAN . Genuine Parts Company hereby establishes, effective as of January 1, 2004, an annual incentive bonus plan for its executive officers known as the Genuine Parts Company 2004 Annual Incentive Bonus Plan. The Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors on February 16, 2004 and approved by the shareholders of the Company on April 19, 2004. It is a replacement for the former Genuine Parts Company Annual Incentive Bonus Plan, which expired on December 31, 2003.
1.2 PURPOSE . The purpose of the Plan is to provide for the payment of annual monetary awards to each participant equal to a percentage of such participants base salary based upon the achievement by the Company of certain performance goals. The Plan is intended to preserve the Companys federal income tax deduction for annual bonus payments under the Plan during the years 2004 to 2008 by meeting the requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.
ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS
2.1 DEFINITIONS . Certain terms of the Plan have defined meanings set forth in this Article and which shall govern unless the context in which they are used clearly indicates that some other meaning is intended.
Beneficiary . Any person or persons designated by a Participant, in accordance with procedures established by the Committee, to receive benefits hereunder in the event of the Participants death. If any Participant shall fail to designate a Beneficiary or shall designate a Beneficiary who shall fail to survive the Participant, the Beneficiary shall be the Participants surviving spouse, or, if none, the Participants surviving descendants (who shall take per stirpes) and if there are no surviving descendants, the Beneficiary shall be the Participants estate.
Board . The Board of Directors of the Company.
Code . The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
Committee . The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board.
Company . Genuine Parts Company, a Georgia corporation, and its corporate successors.
Disability . Any illness or other physical or mental condition of a Participant that renders the Participant incapable of performing his customary and usual duties for the Company, or any medically determinable illness or other physical or mental condition resulting from a bodily injury, disease or mental disorder which, in the judgment of the Committee, is permanent and continuous in nature. The Committee may require such medical or other evidence as it deems necessary to judge the nature and permanency of the Participants condition. The effective date of a Participants Disability shall be as determined by the Committee and communicated to the Participant in writing.
Incentive Bonus . Has the meaning described in Section 5.1.
Participant . An employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries selected by the Committee to participate in the Plan for any Plan Year.
Performance Criteria . The performance criteria listed in Section 5.2 from among which the Committee may set Performance Goals in each Plan Year.
Performance Goals . The performance goals established each Plan Year by the Committee from among the Performance Criteria listed in Section 5.2.
Plan . The Genuine Parts Company 2004 Annual Incentive Bonus Plan as set forth in this document together with any subsequent amendments hereto.
Plan Year . The calendar year.
Retirement . A Participants termination of employment with the Company or a Subsidiary after attaining any normal or early retirement age specified in any pension, profit sharing or other retirement program sponsored by the Company, or, in the event of the inapplicability thereof with respect to the person in question, as determined by the Committee in its judgment.
Subsidiary . Any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity of which a majority of the outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by the Company.
Target Bonus . Has the meaning described in Section 5.3.
ARTICLE 3
ADMINISTRATION
3.1 COMMITTEE . The Plan shall be administered by the Committee.
3.2 AUTHORITY OF COMMITTEE . The Committee has the exclusive power, authority and discretion to:
(a) Designate Participants;
(b) Establish Performance Goals and weightings for difference Performance Goals;
(c) Establish target Incentive Bonuses for Participants;
(d) Determine whether Performance Goals were achieved in a given Plan Year;
(e) Reduce any Incentive Bonus, regardless of the achievement of Performance Goals;
(f) Establish, adopt or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan; and
(g) Make all other decisions and determinations that may be required under the Plan or as the Committee deems necessary or advisable to administer the Plan; and
(h) Amend the Plan as provided herein.
3.3. DECISIONS BINDING . The Committees interpretation of the Plan and all decisions and determinations by the Committee with respect to the Plan are final, binding, and conclusive on all parties.
ARTICLE 4
ELIGIBILITY
4.1. GENERAL . Those employees of the Company or a Subsidiary selected to participate in the Plan by the Committee. Participation in one Plan Year does not guarantee participation in a following Plan Year. The Committee will notify Participants of their eligibility to participate, and the terms thereof, in writing.
4.2. PARTIAL YEAR PARTICIPATION . When employees are chosen for participation after the beginning of a Plan Year, the Committee may prorate their Incentive Bonus amounts based on the number of days they participated in the Plan during the Plan Year.
4.3. DEMOTIONS . If a Participant is demoted during the Plan Year, the Committee will determine whether Plan participation ends at that time, or is continued, perhaps at a reduced level. If participation ends, incentives earned during the time of participation will be prorated for the Plan Year, if the Participant is still an employee at the time Incentive Bonuses are made.
ARTICLE 5
OPERATION OF THE PLAN
5.1 PLAN STRUCTURE . Each Participant shall be eligible to receive an Incentive Bonus in connection with a particular Plan Year if the Company (or, for certain Participants, one or more Subsidiaries or divisions of the Company) meets or exceeds certain Performance Goals set every year by the Committee.
5.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF PERFORMANCE GOALS . Not later than ninety (90) days after the commencement of any Plan Year (or such other date as may be permitted or required by Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee will set in writing Performance Goals for such Plan Year based upon one or more of the following performance criteria:
(a) the achievement by the Company (or one or more Subsidiaries or divisions of the Company) of a specified target return, or target growth in return, on equity or assets,
(b) the Companys stock price,
(c) the achievement by the Company (or one or more Subsidiaries or divisions of the Company) of a specified target, or target growth in, revenues, net income (which may be on a pre-tax or after-tax basis) or earnings per share,
(d) the achievement of objectively determinable goals with respect to service or product delivery, service or product quality, sales, inventory management, customer satisfaction, meeting budgets and/or retention of employees, or
(e) any combination of the criteria set forth in (a) through (d) above.
5.3. ESTABLISHMENT OF INCENTIVE BONUS TARGETS . At the time the Committee sets the Performance Goals for a particular Plan Year, it shall also set in writing the percentages of each Participants base salary that will be awarded to the Participant if the established Performance Goals are achieved (the Target Bonus). The basis for the Target Bonus amount will be competitive practice, as determined by the Committee. The Target Bonus percent will be communicated in writing to each Participant at the beginning of the performance period.
The Committee may, but is not required to, establish the weightings for each Participant for performance within any category of the Performance Goals. If established, the weightings would be expressed as a percent of the Target Bonus that can be earned by the Participant from performance in each category.
5.4 PERCENT OF TARGET EARNED . At the beginning of each Plan Year, the Committee may, but is not required to, identify the percents of Target Bonus that will be earned at various performance levels. For example, the Committee may establish separately for each category of performance (e.g., net income, earnings per share, return on assets, etc.) a level of Expected, Threshold, and Outstanding performance, and provide that a percent of Target Bonus will correspond to each level of performance, such as:
Outstanding: 150%
Expected: 100%
Threshold: 50%
Below Threshold: 0%
5.5 ACHIEVEMENT OF PERFORMANCE GOALS . The determination of whether Performance Goals have been met shall (i) to the extent applicable, be based on financial results reflected in the Companys audited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reported upon by the Companys independent accountants and (ii) be objective, so that a third party having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether such Performance Goals are met. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may adjust any Performance Goals during or after the performance period to mitigate the unbudgeted impact of unusual or non-recurring gains and losses, accounting changes, acquisitions, divestitures or extraordinary items within the meaning of generally accepted accounting principles and that were not f oreseen at the time such Performance Goals were established.
5.6 PAYOUT FORM AND TIMING . Incentive Bonuses will be made as soon as possible after the audited results for the Company are available for the Plan Year. Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may, in its discretion, reduce the amount of an Incentive Bonus otherwise payable to one or more Participants under the Plan.
5.7. ANNUAL LIMIT . In no event shall any Participant receive bonus payments under the Plan in connection with any one Plan Year which exceed $2,000,000.
5.8 DEATH, DISABILITY AND RETIREMENT . In the event of a Participants termination of employment by reason of death, Disability or Retirement, a prorata Incentive Bonus will be made, based on the number of days in the Plan Year preceding the date of termination. Performance criteria will be based on full-year performance. Incentive Bonuses in these situations will be calculated and paid after the end of the Plan Year, the same as for other Participants. Amounts paid on behalf of a deceased Participant will be paid to the Participants Beneficiary.
5.9 OTHER TERMINATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT . In the event of a termination of employment other than by reason of death, Disability or Retirement, the Participant will forfeit any right to an Incentive Bonus for the Plan Year in which the termination of employment occurs. For terminations after a Plan Year, but before payout from the Plan for such Plan Year, payout will be made as though the termination had not occurred. Whether military, government or other service or other leave of absence shall constitute a termination of employment shall be determined in each case by the Committee at its discretion, and any determination by the Committee shall be final and conclusive. A termination of employment shall not occur in a circumstance in which a Participant transfers from the Company to one of its Subsidiaries, transfers from a Subsidiary to the Company, or transfers from one Subsidiary to another Subsidiary.
ARTICLE 6
AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION
6.1. AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION . The Committee may, at any time and from time to time, amend, modify or terminate the Plan; provided, however, that (i) no such amendment may, without the approval of the shareholders of the Company, change the material terms of the Performance Goals or Performance Criteria or effect such other change that would cause the loss of any tax deduction to the Company under Code Section 162(m) absent shareholder approval. The Committee may condition any other amendment or modification on the approval of shareholders of the Company if such approval is necessary or deemed advisable with respect to tax, securities or other applicable laws, policies or regulations.
6.2 TERMINATION AFTER OR DURING A PLAN YEAR . Termination of the Plan after a Plan Year but before Incentive Bonuses are made will not reduce Participants rights to receive Incentive Bonuses. Termination or amendment of the Plan during a Plan Year may be retroactive to the beginning of the Plan Year, at the discretion of the Committee. If any amendment or termination occurs during the Plan Year, the Committee shall determine when and to what extent awards, if any, shall be paid for the portion of the Plan Year preceding the amendment or termination.
ARTICLE 7
GENERAL PROVISIONS
7.1. NO RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE . No officer or employee shall have any right to be selected to participate in the Plan in any Plan Year.
7.2. NO RIGHT TO EMPLOYMENT . Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate any Participants employment at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Company or any Subsidiary.
7.3. WITHHOLDING . The Company or any Subsidiary shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes (including the Participants FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the Plan.
7.4. UNFUNDED STATUS OF AWARDS . The Plan is intended to be an unfunded plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to the Plan, nothing contained in the Plan shall give the Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company or any Subsidiary.
7.5. INDEMNIFICATION . To the extent allowable under applicable law, each member of the Committee shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by such person in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which such person may be a party or in which he may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act under the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by such person in satisfaction of judgment in such action, suit, or proceeding against him provided he gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he undertakes to handle and defend it on his own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such person may be entitled under the Companys Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify him or hold him harmless.
7.6. EXPENSES . The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Subsidiaries.
7.7. TITLES AND HEADINGS . The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only, and in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control.
7.8. GENDER AND NUMBER . Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine; the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.
7.9. GOVERNING LAW. To the extent not governed by federal law, the Plan shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Georgia.
The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being the Genuine Parts Company 2004 Annual Incentive Bonus Plan as adopted by the Board on February 16, 2004 and approved by the shareholders of the Company on April 19, 2004.
|
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY | |
|
||
|
By: |
EXHIBIT 10.25
Description of Director Compensation
Non-employee directors of the Company currently receive $8,750 per fiscal quarter in compensation for service as director, plus $1,250 per board and committee meeting attended, except the Chairmen of the Audit Committee and the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee each receive $10,000 per fiscal quarter and $1,250 per board and committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors may elect to defer the receipt of meeting and/or director fees in accordance with the terms of the Companys Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003. In addition, non-employee directors may from time to time be granted restricted stock units pursuant to the provisions of the Genuine Parts Company 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan. The compensation of directors may be changed from time to time by the Board of Directors without stockholder approval.
EXHIBIT 10.26
PERFORMANCE RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
Non-transferable
GRANT TO
by Genuine Parts Company (the Company) of
[_________]
Performance Restricted Stock Units
convertible into shares of its Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Units).
pursuant to and subject to the provisions of the Genuine Parts Company Amended and Restated 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) and to the terms and conditions set forth on the following page (the Terms and Conditions).
Unless accelerated in accordance with the Plan or in the discretion of the Committee, the Units
will be earned on December 31, 2004 in accordance with the following schedule:
Actual Pre-Tax Profit as a
Percent of Target*
Actual Pre-Tax Profit
Percent of Units Earned**
less than $574,500,625
0
%
$574,500,625
50
%
$604,737,500 or more
100
%
* | Pre-tax profit target for the year ending December 31, 2004 is $604,737,500 | |
** | Straight line interpolation is used to determine percent of Units earned when actual level is between two designated points. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a Change in Control prior to December 31, 2004, 100% of the Units will be earned. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Genuine Parts Company has caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Grant Date, as indicated below.
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
By: | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Its: Authorized Officer | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Grant Date: | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Accepted by Grantee: | ||||||
|
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Grant of Units . Genuine Parts Company (the Company) hereby grants to the Grantee named on page 1 hereof (Grantee), subject to the restrictions and the other terms and conditions set forth in the Genuine Parts Company Amended and Restated 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) and in this award agreement (this Agreement), the right to earn on December 31, 2004 the maximum number of restricted stock units indicated on page 1 hereof which, if and to the extent earned (the Units), will represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of the Companys $1.00 par value common stock (Stock) on the terms set forth in this Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.
2. Vesting of Units . The earned Units will be credited to a bookkeeping account on behalf of Grantee and will vest and become non-forfeitable on the earliest to occur of the following (the Vesting Date):
(a) | December 31, 2008, | |||
(b) | The date of Grantees Retirement after December 31, 2004, or | |||
(c) | The date of Grantees termination of employment due to death or Disability, or | |||
(d) | The effective date of a Change in Control. |
If Grantees employment terminates prior to the Vesting Date for any reason other than as described in (b) or (c) above, Grantee shall forfeit all right, title and interest in and to the then unvested Units as of the date of such termination and the unvested Units will be reconveyed to the Company without further consideration or any act or action by Grantee.
3. Conversion to Stock . Unless the Units are forfeited prior to the Vesting Date as provided in paragraph 2 above or deferred pursuant to paragraph 4 below, the Units will be converted to actual shares of Stock on the earlier of the effective date of a Change in Control or December 31, 2008 (the Conversion Date). Stock certificates evidencing the conversion of Units into shares of Stock will be registered on the books of the Company in Grantees name as of the Conversion Date and delivered to Grantee as soon as practical thereafter.
4. Deferral Election . At any time prior to December 31, 2007, Grantee may elect to defer delivery of the shares of Stock that would otherwise be due on the Conversion Date with respect to any or all of the Units. If such deferral election is made, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, establish the rules and procedures for such payment deferrals.
5. Limitation of Rights . The Units do not confer to Grantee or Grantees beneficiary any rights of a shareholder of the Company unless and until shares of Stock are in fact issued to such person in connection with the Units. Nothing in this Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any affiliate to terminate Grantees employment at any time, nor confer upon Grantee any right to continue in the employment of the Company or any affiliate.
6. Dividend Equivalents . If any dividends or other distributions are paid with respect to the Companys Stock while the earned Units are outstanding, the dollar amount or fair market value of such dividends or distributions with respect to the number of shares of Stock then underlying the Units shall be converted into additional Units in Grantees name, based on the Fair Market Value of the Stock as of the date such dividends or distributions were payable, and such additional Units shall be subject to the same forfeiture and transfer restrictions and deferral terms as apply to the Units with respect to which they relate. Upon conversion of the Units into shares of Stock at the Conversion Date or any applicable deferral termination date, Grantee will obtain full voting and other rights as a shareholder of the Company.
7. Restrictions on Transfer and Pledge . No right or interest of Grantee in the Units may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other than the Company or an affiliate, or shall be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of Grantee to any other party other than the Company or an affiliate. The Units are not assignable or transferable by Grantee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order that would satisfy Section 414(p)(1)(A) of the Code; but the Committee may permit other transfers.
8. Payment of Taxes . Grantee will, no later than the date as of which any amount related to the Units first becomes includable in Grantees gross income for federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company, or make other arrangements satisfactory to the Committee regarding payment of, any federal, state and local taxes of any kind (including Grantees FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to such amount. The obligations of the Company under this Agreement will be conditional on such payment or arrangements, and the Company, and, where applicable, its subsidiaries will, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to Grantee.
9. Amendment . The Committee may amend, modify or terminate this Agreement without approval of Grantee; provided, however, that such amendment, modification or termination shall not, without Grantees consent, reduce or diminish the value of this award determined as if it had been fully vested (i.e., as if all restrictions on the Units hereunder had expired) on the date of such amendment or termination.
10. Plan Controls . The terms contained in the Plan are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement and this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Plan. In the event of any actual or alleged conflict between the provisions of the Plan and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall be controlling and determinative.
11. Successors . This Agreement shall be binding upon any successor of the Company, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Plan.
12. Severability . If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the other provisions of this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been included.
13. Notice . Notices and communications under this Agreement must be in writing and either personally delivered or sent by registered or certified United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. Notices to the Company must be addressed to:
Genuine Parts Company
2999 Circle 75 Parkway
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Attn: Secretary
or any other address designated by the Company in a written notice to Grantee. Notices to Grantee will be directed to the address of Grantee then currently on file with the Company, or at any other address given by Grantee in a written notice to the Company.
EXHIBIT 10.27
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
Non-transferable
GRANT TO
by Genuine Parts Company (the Company) of
Stock Appreciation Rights with respect to
[_______]
shares of its common stock, $1.00 par value (the SARs)
having a base value of $____ per share (the Base Value)
pursuant to and subject to the provisions of the Genuine Parts Company Amended and Restated 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) and to the terms and conditions set forth on the following page (the Terms and Conditions).
Unless vesting is accelerated in accordance with the Plan or in the discretion of the Committee,
the SARs shall vest (become exercisable) in accordance with the following schedule:
Continued Employment
Percent of SAR Shares
after Grant Date
Vested
0
%
33
%
33
%
34
%
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Genuine Parts Company has caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Grant Date, as indicated below.
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
By: | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Its: Authorized Officer | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Grant Date: | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Accepted by Grantee: | ||||||
|
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Grant of SARs . Genuine Parts Company (the Company) hereby grants to the Grantee named on page 1 hereof (Grantee), under the Genuine Parts Company Amended and Restated 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) and on the terms and on conditions set forth in this agreement (this Agreement), stock appreciation rights with respect to the number of shares of Stock indicated on page 1 hereof at the Base Value per share set forth on page 1 hereof (the SARs). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.
2. Base Value and Benefit . The Base Value of each SAR is equal to the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the Grant Date. Each SAR entitles Grantee to receive from the Company upon the exercise of the SAR an amount, payable in shares of Stock, equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the Fair Market Value of one share of Stock on the date of exercise, over (b) the Base Value per share.
3. Vesting of SARs . The SARs shall vest (become exercisable) in accordance with the schedule shown on page 1 of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule, if Grantees employment terminates by reason of his or her death, Disability or Retirement more than one year after the date of grant of the SARs, the SARs shall become fully vested and exercisable as of such date of termination. Upon the effective date of a Change of Control, all SARs held by Grantee shall become fully vested and exercisable.
4. Term of SARs and Limitations on Right to Exercise . The term of the SARs is a period of ten years, expiring at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the tenth anniversary of the Grant Date (the Expiration Date). To the extent not previously exercised, the SARs will lapse prior to the Expiration Date upon the earliest to occur of the following circumstances:
(a) | Three months after the termination of the Grantees employment with the Company for any reason other than by reason of the Grantees death, Disability or Retirement. | |||
(b) | Twelve months after the date of the termination of the Grantees employment with the Company by reason of Disability or Retirement. | |||
(c) | Twelve months after the date of the Grantees death, if the Grantee dies while employed with the Company, or during the three-month period described in subsection (a) above or during the twelve-month period described in subsection (b) above and before the SARs otherwise lapse. Upon the Grantees death, the SARs may be exercised by the Grantees beneficiary designated pursuant to the Plan. |
The Committee may, prior to the lapse of the SARs under the circumstances described in paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) above, extend the time to exercise the SARs. If the Grantee or his or her beneficiary exercises a SAR after termination of employment, the SARs may be exercised only with respect to the shares that were otherwise vested as of such termination.
5. Exercise of SAR . The SARs shall be exercised by written notice directed to the Secretary of the Company or his or her designee at the address and in the form specified by the Secretary from time to time. If the person exercising a SAR is not Grantee, such person shall also deliver with the notice of exercise appropriate proof of his or her right to exercise the SAR.
6. Limitation of Rights . The SARs do not confer to Grantee or Grantees beneficiary any rights of a shareholder of the Company unless and until shares of Stock are in fact issued to such person in connection with the exercise of the SARs. Nothing in this Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any affiliate to terminate Grantees employment at any time, nor confer upon Grantee any right to continue in the employment of the Company or any affiliate.
7. Restrictions on Transfer and Pledge . No right or interest of Grantee in the SARs may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other than the Company or an affiliate, or shall be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of Grantee to any other party other than the Company or an affiliate. The SARs are not assignable or transferable by Grantee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order that would satisfy Section 414(p)(1)(A) of the Code; but the Committee may permit other transfers. The SARs may be exercised during the lifetime of Grantee only by Grantee or any permitted transferee.
8. Withholding . The Company or any employer affiliate has the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require Grantee to remit to the employer, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes (including Grantees FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the exercise of the SARs. The withholding requirement may be satisfied, in whole or in part, at the election of the Secretary, by withholding from the SAR shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of withholding equal to the minimum amount (and not any greater amount) required to be withheld for tax purposes, all in accordance with such procedures as the Secretary establishes.
9. Plan Controls . The terms contained in the Plan are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement and this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Plan. In the event of any actual or alleged conflict between the provisions of the Plan and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall be controlling and determinative.
10. Successors . This Agreement shall be binding upon any successor of the Company, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Plan.
11. Severability . If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the other provisions of this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been included.
12. Notice . Notices and communications under this Agreement must be in writing and either personally delivered or sent by registered or certified United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. Notices to the Company must be addressed to:
Genuine Parts Company
2999 Circle 75 Parkway
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Attn: Secretary
or any other address designated by the Company in a written notice to Grantee. Notices to Grantee will be directed to the address of Grantee then currently on file with the Company, or at any other address given by Grantee in a written notice to the Company.
EXHIBIT 10.28
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
Non-transferable
GRANT TO
by Genuine Parts Company (the Company) of
____Restricted Stock Units
convertible into shares of its Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Units).
pursuant to and subject to the provisions of the Genuine Parts Company 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) and to the terms and conditions set forth on the following page (the Terms and Conditions).
Unless accelerated as provided herein or in the discretion of the Committee or further deferred by Grantee, the Units will be converted to shares of Stock on August 16, 2009.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Genuine Parts Company has caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Grant Date, as indicated below.
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
By: | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Carol B. Yancey
|
||||||
|
Vice President - Finance and Corporate Secretary
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
Grant Date: | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Accepted by Grantee: | ||||||
|
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Grant of Units . Genuine Parts Company (the Company) hereby grants to the Grantee named on page 1 hereof (Grantee), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Genuine Parts Company Amended and Restated 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) and in this award agreement (this Agreement), the number of restricted stock units (the Units) indicated on page 1 hereof which represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of the Companys $1.00 par value Stock (Stock) on the terms set forth in this Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.
2. Vesting of Units . The Units have been credited to a bookkeeping account on behalf of Grantee. The Units are fully vested and non-forfeitable as of August 16, 2004.
3. Conversion to Stock . Unless deferred pursuant to Paragraph 4 below, the Units will be converted to actual shares of Stock on the earliest of (i) the effective date of a Change in Control, (ii) Grantees termination of service as a director of the Company due to death, disability or retirement, or (iii) August 16, 2009 (the Conversion Date). Stock certificates evidencing the conversion of Units into shares of Stock will be registered on the books of the Company in Grantees name as of the Conversion Date and delivered to Grantee as soon as practical thereafter.
4. Deferral Election . At any time prior to August 16, 2008, and subject to applicable law, Grantee may elect to defer delivery of the shares of Stock that would otherwise be due on the Conversion Date with respect to any or all of the Units. If such deferral election is made, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, establish the rules and procedures for such payment deferrals.
5. Limitation of Rights . The Units do not confer to Grantee or Grantees beneficiary any rights of a shareholder of the Company unless and until Shares are in fact issued to such person in connection with the Units. Nothing in this Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any affiliate to terminate Grantees service at any time, nor confer upon Grantee any right to continue in the service of the Company or any affiliate.
6. Dividend Equivalents . If any dividends or other distributions are paid with respect to the Companys Stock while the Units are outstanding, the dollar amount or fair market value of such dividends or distributions with respect to the number of shares of Stock then underlying the Units shall be converted into additional Units in Grantees name, based on the Fair Market Value of the Stock as of the date such dividends or distributions were payable, and such additional Units shall be subject to the same deferral terms as apply to the Units with respect to which they relate. Upon conversion of the Units into shares of Stock at the Conversion Date or any applicable deferral termination date, Grantee will obtain full voting and other rights as a shareholder of the Company.
7. Restrictions on Transfer . No right or interest of Grantee in the Units may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other than the Company or an affiliate, or shall be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of Grantee to any other party other than the Company or an affiliate. The Units are not assignable or transferable by Grantee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order that would satisfy Section 414(p)(1)(A) of the Code; but the Committee may permit other transfers.
8. Amendment . The Committee may amend, modify or terminate this Agreement without approval of Grantee; provided, however, that such amendment, modification or termination shall not, without Grantees consent, reduce or diminish the value of this award determined as of the date of such amendment or termination.
9. Plan Controls . The terms contained in the Plan are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement and this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Plan. In the event of any actual or alleged conflict between the provisions of the Plan and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall be controlling and determinative.
10. Successors . This Agreement shall be binding upon any successor of the Company, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Plan.
11. Severability . If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the other provisions of this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been included.
12. Notice . Notices and communications under this Agreement must be in writing and either personally delivered or sent by registered or certified United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. Notices to the Company must be addressed to:
Genuine Parts Company
2999 Circle 75 Parkway
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Attn: Secretary
or any other address designated by the Company in a written notice to Grantee. Notices to Grantee will be directed to the address of Grantee then currently on file with the Company, or at any other address given by Grantee in a written notice to the Company.
EXHIBIT 13
Selected Financial Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) Year ended December 31, | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 9,097,267 | $ | 8,449,300 | $ | 8,258,927 | $ | 8,220,668 | $ | 8,369,857 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
6,267,544 | 5,826,684 | 5,704,749 | 5,699,174 | *** | 5,764,360 | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, administrative and other expenses
|
2,193,804 | 2,050,873 | 1,948,442 | 1,951,559 | *** | 1,958,747 | |||||||||||||||||||
Facility consolidation and impairment charges
|
| | | 73,922 | *** | | |||||||||||||||||||
Income before taxes and accounting change
|
635,919 | 571,743 | 605,736 | 496,013 | 646,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
240,367 | 218,101 | 238,236 | 198,866 | 261,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle
|
395,552 | 353,642 | 367,500 | 297,147 | 385,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
| 19,541 | * | 395,090 | ** | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) after cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 395,552 | $ | 334,101 | $ | (27,590 | ) | $ | 297,147 | $ | 385,323 | ||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding during year -
assuming dilution
|
175,660 | 174,480 | 175,104 | 173,633 | 175,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted net income, excluding cumulative effect
|
$ | 2.25 | $ | 2.03 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.71 | *** | $ | 2.20 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss)
|
2.25 | 1.91 | (0.16 | ) | 1.71 | 2.20 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
1.20 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.14 | 1.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31 closing stock price
|
44.06 | 33.20 | 30.80 | 36.70 | 26.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
500,000 | 625,108 | 674,796 | 835,580 | 770,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
2,544,377 | 2,312,283 | 2,130,009 | 2,345,123 | 2,260,806 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 4,455,247 | $ | 4,127,956 | $ | 4,061,055 | $ | 4,206,646 | $ | 4,142,114 | |||||||||||||||
* | The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in 2003 represents a non-cash charge related to cash consideration received from vendors in conjunction with the Financial Accounting Standards Boards EITF 02-16. Had the Company accounted for vendor consideration in accordance with EITF 02-16 in prior years, there would have been no significant impact on net income (loss) and diluted income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. Furthermore, approximately $90 million, $111 million, and $82 million would have been reclassified from selling, administrative and other expenses to cost of goods sold for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. | |
** | The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in 2002 represents a non-cash charge related to the impairment testing for goodwill in conjunction with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. If the Company had applied the non-amortization provisions of Statement 142 for all periods presented, net income and diluted income per common share would have increased by approximately $11.9 million ($.07 per share) and $11.4 million ($.06 per share) for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. | |
*** | Facility Consolidation, Impairment and Other Charges (2001 Charges) totaled $107.8 million pre-tax in 2001 and $64.4 million after tax. The pre-tax charges include $17.4 million classified in cost of goods sold and $16.4 million classified in selling, administrative and other expenses. Diluted net income per common share before the 2001 Charges was $2.08. |
Market and Dividend information
High and Low Sales Price and Dividends per Common Share Traded on the New York Stock Exchange
Sales Price of Common Shares
Quarter
2004
2003
High
Low
High
Low
$
35.06
$
32.03
$
31.88
$
27.43
40.20
32.65
33.66
30.70
39.94
36.10
33.45
30.03
44.32
36.51
33.20
30.78
Dividends Declared Per Share
2004
2003
$
0.30
$
0.295
0.30
0.295
0.30
0.295
0.30
0.295
Number of Record Holders of Common Stock as of December 31, 2004: 7,559
Segment Data
(dollars in thousands) Year ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
$
4,739,261
$
4,477,508
$
4,335,362
$
4,252,913
$
4,163,814
2,511,597
2,253,947
2,246,124
2,234,241
2,342,686
1,540,878
1,457,149
1,396,453
1,379,859
1,336,500
335,605
297,618
315,826
387,771
557,866
(30,074
)
(36,922
)
(34,838
)
(34,116
)
(31,009
)
$
9,097,267
$
8,449,300
$
8,258,927
$
8,220,668
$
8,369,857
$
396,015
$
363,022
$
381,771
$
378,162
$
381,250
173,760
151,109
178,027
172,208
206,193
150,817
143,263
140,912
141,762
134,343
14,611
7,112
2,756
3,229
28,010
735,203
664,506
703,466
695,361
749,796
(37,260
)
(51,538
)
(59,640
)
(59,416
)
(63,496
)
(58,980
)
(37,121
)
(33,354
)
(27,670
)
(23,277
)
(356
)
(1,539
)
(2,421
)
(14,333
)
(13,843
)
(2,688
)
(2,565
)
(2,315
)
(3,077
)
(2,430
)
(94,852
)
$
635,919
$
571,743
$
605,736
$
496,013
$
646,750
$
2,521,906
$
2,369,969
$
2,313,747
$
2,219,503
$
2,099,610
955,029
957,735
982,951
867,716
840,585
681,992
621,523
581,203
538,468
542,406
104,918
97,195
98,225
121,721
190,635
133,730
23,506
26,224
17,160
17,443
57,672
58,028
58,705
442,078
451,435
$
4,455,247
$
4,127,956
$
4,061,055
$
4,206,646
$
4,142,114
$
39,222
$
42,681
$
43,007
$
45,094
$
51,546
8,972
10,265
10,789
11,992
11,617
10,245
10,639
9,856
9,345
9,598
2,011
2,729
3,422
4,009
4,391
1,401
1,160
656
1,020
1,308
356
1,539
2,421
14,333
13,843
$
62,207
$
69,013
$
70,151
$
85,793
$
92,303
$
52,263
$
58,754
$
38,599
$
26,766
$
35,031
3,922
6,824
10,868
6,388
20,054
12,354
7,211
13,376
5,941
9,116
1,552
394
224
2,466
3,183
1,986
721
1,691
383
3,745
$
72,077
$
73,904
$
64,758
$
41,944
$
71,129
$
8,198,368
$
7,666,389
$
7,568,926
$
7,526,631
$
7,665,498
845,563
731,200
623,686
629,330
633,715
83,410
88,633
101,153
98,823
101,653
(30,074
)
(36,922
)
(34,838
)
(34,116
)
(31,009
)
$
9,097,267
$
8,449,300
$
8,258,927
$
8,220,668
$
8,369,857
$
368,345
$
339,020
$
339,495
$
579,635
$
618,818
65,649
57,906
47,522
182,041
201,895
3,066
4,094
4,739
25,534
25,982
$
437,060
$
401,020
$
391,756
$
787,210
$
846,695
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
December 31, 2004
OVERVIEW
Genuine Parts Company is a service organization engaged in the distribution of automotive replacement parts, industrial replacement parts, office products and electrical/electronic materials. The Company has a long tradition of growth dating back to 1928, the year we were founded in Atlanta, Georgia. In 2004, business was conducted throughout the United States, in Canada and in Mexico from approximately 1,900 locations.
We recorded consolidated net income of $396 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, up 12% from $354 million in 2003 before the cumulative effect of an accounting change adopted January 1, 2003. After the cumulative effect adjustment, which decreased 2003 net income by almost $20 million, net income for 2004 was up 18% from $334 million in 2003. The benefits of an improved economic climate combined with our internal initiatives allowed us to achieve a record level of sales and earnings in 2004. All four of our business segments contributed to our achievement, each with gains in revenues and profits.
Over the three years preceding 2004, the results in all of our industry groups were affected by the slow economy, especially in the manufacturing sectors of the U.S. The Company countered this negative economic impact with the introduction of new product lines, sales to new markets and cost savings initiatives, among other things. Our improved results in 2004 proved these efforts to be successful.
During 2002 and 2003 we recorded certain charges to earnings as a result of changes in accounting principles relating to goodwill impairment and cash consideration received from vendors. These changes had no impact on our operating results and no cash implications for us. The changes in accounting principles in 2002 and 2003 are discussed further under Results of Operations below. Our results are also dependent on the effect of certain accounting assumptions and estimates, which are discussed under Critical Accounting Estimates below.
The major December 31, 2004 balance sheet categories, with the
exception of our improved cash position and accounts payable
balance, were relatively consistent with the December 31, 2003
balance sheet categories. The Companys cash balances increased
$120 million from December 31, 2003, due primarily to improved
operating results, stock option exercises and improved payment
terms with certain vendors. These extended payment terms as well as
increased purchases explain our increase in accounts payable. Our
liquidity and capital resources improved in 2004, as we reduced our
total debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 by approximately $177
million compared to December 31, 2003.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Companys results of operations are summarized for the three
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Year ended December 31
(in thousands, except
for per share data)
2004
2003
2002
$
9,097,267
$
8,449,300
$
8,258,927
2,829,723
2,622,616
2,554,178
395,552
353,642
367,500
(19,541
)
(395,090
)
395,552
334,101
(27,590
)
2.25
2.03
2.10
2.25
1.91
(.16
)
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 totaled $9.1 billion, a record sales level for the Company, and an 8% increase from 2003. All of the business segments contributed to our sales growth for the year, as our internal initiatives and improved economic conditions in the industries we serve positively impacted sales volume in each of our four groups. Prices were up approximately 1% in the Automotive, Office and Electrical segments in 2004, and pricing in the Industrial segment increased 5% in 2004. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 totaled $8.45 billion, a 2% increase from 2002. We finished 2003 encouraged that our sales were trending in a positive direction, due to signs of improving economic indicators and our 5% sales increase in the fourth quarter of 2003 compared to the fourth quarter in 2002. In 2003, prices were down slightly in the Automotive and Electrical segments, while pricing in the Industrial and Office segments increased 2% and .6%, respectively.
Automotive Group
Net sales for the Automotive Group (Automotive) were $4.7 billion in 2004, an increase of 6% over 2003. This represents Automotives greatest percentage sales growth in several years and, among the quarters, the first and fourth quarters were stronger than the second and third quarters. After a strong first quarter that included an extra billing day, we experienced some moderation in Automotive sales from June through August, following the lower consumer spending figures reported for this period. Our results showed some improvement in September and this continued through the final period of 2004. Automotive sales were $4.5 billion in 2003, an increase of 3% over 2002. In the fourth quarter of 2003, Automotive sales were stronger than the previous quarters in 2003, up 6%, and we were encouraged that this improvement in revenues would carry over into 2004 as it did.
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Industrial Group
Net sales for Motion Industries, our Industrial Group (Industrial), were $2.5 billion in 2004, an 11% increase compared to 2003. Improved economic conditions across our industrial customer base helped to significantly improve our growth opportunities relative to the last few years. After high single digit percentage growth in revenues in the first quarter, growth in the remaining quarters of 2004 improved, with increases ranging from low double-digit rates to those in the mid-teens. Industrial sales were $2.3 billion in 2003, only a slight increase over 2002, and the two years before that were equally difficult periods, as weak conditions were pervasive in the markets served by Industrial. U.S. industrial production and factory utilization statistics began to show some improving trends late in 2003. These remained strong throughout 2004, and the continued strength of the production and utilization numbers is encouraging as we look ahead to 2005.
Office Group
Net sales for S.P. Richards, our Office Products Group (Office), were $1.54 billion, up 6% over 2003. Revenue growth at Office was generally consistent from quarter to quarter in 2004, although its best performance was in the third quarter. In 2004, sales increases in the office furniture category and at our Canadian operations helped lead Office to its strongest sales growth in several years. Office sales were $1.46 billion in 2003, up 4% over 2002. Office typically generates our steadiest results from year to year, despite the changes in the economic climate. This is accomplished through the continuous expansion of our product and service offerings, as well as initiatives to expand our customer base.
Electrical Group
Net sales for EIS, our Electrical and Electronic Group (Electrical), were up 13% to $336 million in 2004, its best performance in several years. As Electricals growth opportunities depend on the manufacturing sector of the economy, the improved conditions we began to see late in 2003 continued into 2004, positively impacting our results. Electrical sales were down 6% to $298 million in 2003 from the prior year. This was the third year of a downward trend in Electrical revenues, reflecting the difficult economic environment in which Electrical operated during the three years preceding 2004. We were encouraged, however, that the sales decrease in 2003 was less than the declines reported in the prior two years, and fourth quarter revenues were up slightly compared to the same period in 2002.
Cost of Goods Sold/Expenses
Cost of goods sold in 2004 was 68.9% of net sales compared to 69.0% in 2003. Selling, administrative and other expenses (SG&A) of $2.2 billion were 24.1% of sales compared to 24.3% last year. The slight decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales reflects our on-going efforts to improve our gross margins. Initiatives to enhance our pricing strategies, promote and sell higher margin products and minimize material acquisition costs are examples of the efforts we have made to reduce our cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales. These initiatives were developed to offset the usual competitive pricing pressures as well as lower levels of vendor discounts and volume incentives earned for the year, especially in Industrial. In 2004, the impact of vendor discounts and volume incentives was less than in 2003. The decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales reflects the savings associated with our initiatives to control costs. These initiatives include tight controls over operating expenses as well as continuous improvement programs designed to optimize our utilization of people and systems.
Cost of goods sold was 69.0% of net sales in 2003 compared to 69.1% in 2002. SG&A expenses of $2.1 billion were 24.3% of sales compared to 23.6% in 2002. The decrease in cost of goods sold and the increase in SG&A expenses reflect our reclassification in 2003 of certain vendor consideration associated with the adoption of EITF 02-16 as defined below. Before the reclassification, cost of goods sold in 2003 was 70.2% of sales and SG&A expenses were 23.1% of sales. This increase in cost of goods sold as a percentage of 2003 net sales was due to lower levels of vendor discounts and volume incentives related to purchases, overall competitive pricing pressures and product and customer mix. The comparable decrease in SG&A expenses reflects our on-going cost savings initiatives.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company was required to adopt the Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Forces Issue No. 02-16, related to the accounting treatment of cash consideration received from vendors (EITF 02-16). This encompasses certain advertising and promotional allowances, catalog support and other cash support arrangements that normally exist among retailers and distributors with their vendors. We historically classified certain vendor monies received, primarily advertising related, as a component of SG&A expenses. Under the new EITF 02-16, these vendor monies must be classified as cost of goods sold and a portion of the amounts must be capitalized into ending inventory. In connection with the January 1, 2003 adoption of EITF 02-16, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of approximately $19.5 million in 2003. In addition, we reclassified approximately $102.2 million from SG&A expenses to cost of goods sold in 2003. Under EITF 02-16, prior periods were not reclassified.
Operating Profit
Operating profit as a percentage of net sales was 8.1% in 2004 compared to 7.9% in 2003. These results reflect the improvement in our revenue, gross margins and SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales. The challenges associated with reduced vendor discounts and volume incentives, as well as expense increases such as employee benefits, insurance and legal and professional costs, prevented us from achieving greater gains in our 2004 operating profits. Operating profit as a percentage of sales was 7.9% in 2003 compared to 8.5% in 2002. These results reflect our decrease in comparable gross margins, as well as an environment of rising pension and healthcare costs and the overall economic conditions in certain markets, which constrained our sales opportunities in 2003.
Automotive Group
Automotive operating margins increased to 8.4% in 2004 from 8.1% in 2003. The increase reflects the impact on sales of positive industry trends and improved economic conditions, in addition to the success of our internal initiatives. Automotive operating margins decreased to 8.1% in 2003 from 8.8% in 2002, primarily due to pricing pressures combined with increases in salaries,
insurance and other expenses associated with the addition of new Company owned stores.
Industrial Group
Industrial operating margins increased to 6.9% in 2004 from 6.7% in 2003. As a result of the improved conditions across Industrials customer base, combined with the benefits of internal operating and other cost initiatives, Industrials operating profit increased significantly. However, factors such as the decrease in vendor discounts and volume incentives affected the growth of Industrials operating margin in 2004. Industrial operating margins decreased to 6.7% in 2003 from 7.9% in 2002, as overall lower levels of vendor discounts and volume incentives earned in 2003 affected this segment the greatest.
Office Group
Operating margins in Office were 9.8% in both 2004 and 2003. Initiatives to positively influence the customer and product mix of sales, as well as to enhance the selection of selling tools available to customers, helped Office maintain its operating margin. Office margins decreased slightly to 9.8% in 2003 from 10.1% in 2002, primarily attributable to customer and product mix.
Electrical Group
Operating margins in Electrical increased to 4.4% in 2004 from 2.4% in 2003. Electrical growth reflects the increase in sales to the manufacturing sector, as well as continued focus on enhancing sales margins and controlling costs. Electrical increased its margins significantly to 2.4% in 2003 from .9% in 2002. Improvement in 2003 was due to efforts to reduce costs through headcount reductions, branch closings and operating expense controls.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate decreased to 37.8% in 2004 from 38.1% in 2003. The decrease in 2004 is primarily due to favorable permanent differences and the continued utilization of foreign tax credits, as a result of certain favorable provisions in the 2004 Tax Act. The effective income tax rate decreased to 38.1% in 2003 from 39.3% in 2002, primarily due to the utilization of foreign tax credits in 2003 and lower state income taxes.
Net Income
Net income was $396 million in 2004, up 12% from $354 million in 2003 before the cumulative effect of an accounting change adopted on January 1, 2003. On a per share diluted basis, net income was $2.25 in 2004 compared to $2.03 in 2003 before the cumulative effect adjustment. After the 2003 cumulative effect adjustment, net income in 2004 was up 18% from $334 million, or $1.91 diluted earnings per share in 2003. Net income in 2004 was 4.3% of net sales compared to 4.2% in 2003 before the 2003 cumulative effect adjustment, and 4.0% of net sales in 2003 after the cumulative effect adjustment.
Net income before the cumulative effect of accounting changes in 2003 and 2002 was $354 million in 2003 compared to $368 million in 2002, a decrease of 4%. On a per share diluted basis, net income before the cumulative effect adjustments equaled $2.03 in 2003 compared to $2.10 in 2002. After the cumulative effect adjustments, net income was $334 million, or $1.91 diluted earnings per share, in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 of $28 million, or $.16 diluted loss per share. In the first quarter of 2002, the Company completed impairment testing for goodwill in conjunction with the provisions introduced in SFAS 142, resulting in a non-cash charge of $395.1 million. This was recorded as of January 1, 2002 as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. Net income before the cumulative effect of accounting changes in 2003 and 2002 was 4.2% of net sales in 2003 compared to 4.5% in 2002, and after the cumulative effect was 4.0% of net sales in 2003 compared to -0.3% in 2002.
Facility Consolidation, Impairment and Other Charges
In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Companys management approved a plan to close and consolidate certain Company-operated facilities, terminate certain employees, and exit certain other activities. The Company also determined that certain assets were impaired. During 2001, the Company recorded a charge of $107.8 million ($64.4 million, net of tax), of which $89.5 million were non-cash charges related to the plan. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had an accrual of $2.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively, recorded in accrued expenses relating to lease obligations still outstanding on closed facilities.
Financial Condition
The major balance sheet categories at December 31, 2004, with the exception of cash and accounts payable, were relatively consistent with the December 31, 2003 balance sheet categories. The Companys cash balances increased $120 million from December 31, 2003, due primarily to improved operating results, stock option exercises and improved payment terms with certain vendors. Our accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2004 increased 4% compared to last year, primarily due to our December sales increase. Inventory increased 3% from December 31, 2003, which is less than our 8% increase in revenues. The change in inventory reflects our continued emphasis on inventory management. Other assets at December 31, 2004 increased $60 million due primarily to contributions into the Company sponsored pension plans. Accounts payable at December 31, 2004 increased $150 million from 2003 due to the Companys increased purchases associated with increased sales volume, as well as improved payment terms with certain vendors. The change in debt is discussed below.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company reduced its total debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 by approximately $177 million compared to December 31, 2003. The decline in borrowings is primarily attributable to cash generated from operating activities of $555 million and approximately $38 million generated through employee stock option exercises. In addition, our dividends, stock repurchases, capital expenditures and other investing activities in 2004 were comparable to 2003.
The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 3.2 to 1 at December 31, 2004, and the Companys cash position improved significantly from December 31, 2003. The Company believes existing credit facilities and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to fund future operations and to meet its short-term and long-term cash requirements.
Notes and Other Borrowings
In November 2004, the Company repaid in full a $125 million debt financing with a consortium of financial institutions and insurance companies (the Notes). The proceeds of the Notes
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
were primarily used to repay certain variable rate borrowings with interest at LIBOR plus .50%, reset every six months. These Notes were paid with cash generated from the operations of the Company.
On October 31, 2003, the Company obtained a $350 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a consortium of financial institutions which matures in October 2008 and bears interest at LIBOR plus .30% (2.70% at December 31, 2004). At December 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under the line of credit. At December 31, 2003, $50 million was outstanding under the line of credit.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had unsecured Senior Notes outstanding under a $500 million financing arrangement as follows: $250 million, Series A, 5.86% fixed, due 2008; and $250 million, Series B, 6.23% fixed, due 2011 and approximately $1 million in other borrowings.
Certain borrowings contain covenants related to a maximum debt-to-equity ratio, a minimum fixed-charge coverage ratio, and certain limitations on additional borrowings. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. Due to the requirements in certain states, the Company also had unused letters of credit of $47.5 million and $38.5 million outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the Companys outstanding borrowings was approximately 6.05% and 4.92% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Total interest expense for all borrowings was $37.3 million and $51.5 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Construction and Lease Facility
The Company also has an $85 million construction and lease facility. Properties acquired by the lessor are constructed and then leased to the Company under operating lease agreements. The total amount advanced and outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2004 was approximately $84 million. Since the resulting leases are operating leases, no debt obligation is recorded on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. This construction and lease facility expires in 2008. Lease payments fluctuate based upon current interest rates and are generally based upon LIBOR plus .60%. The lease facility contains residual value guarantee provisions and guarantees under events of default. Although management believes the likelihood of funding to be remote, the maximum guarantee obligation under the construction and lease facility was approximately $84 million at December 31, 2004.
Contractual and Other Obligations
The following table shows the Companys approximate obligations and commitments, excluding interest due on credit facilities, to make future payments under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:
PAYMENT DUE BY PERIOD
Period less
Period 1-3
Period 4-5
Period over
(in thousands)
Total
than 1 year
years
years
5 years
$
500,968
$
968
$
250,000
$
$
250,000
31,144
3,210
10,432
6,631
10,871
422,758
116,544
192,792
46,667
66,755
$
954,870
$
120,722
$
453,224
$
53,298
$
327,626
Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of inventory and other goods and services are not included in our estimates. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. Our purchase orders are based on our current distribution needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. The Company does not have significant agreements for the purchase of inventory or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements.
The Company has certain commercial commitments related to affiliate borrowing guarantees and residual values under operating leases. The Company believes the likelihood of any significant amounts being funded in connection with these commitments to be remote. The following table shows the Companys approximate commercial commitments as of December 31, 2004:
PAYMENT DUE BY PERIOD
Total
Period
Period
Period
Period
Amounts
less than
1-3
4-5
over
(in thousands)
Committed
1 year
years
years
5 years
$
169,029
$
30,352
$
24,453
$
16,302
$
97,922
72,640
72,640
$
241,669
$
30,352
$
24,453
$
88,942
$
97,922
In addition, the Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan that may obligate us to make contributions to the plan from time to time. Contributions in 2004 were $63 million. We expect to make a cash contribution to our qualified defined benefit plan in 2005, and contributions required for 2006 and future years will depend on a number of unpredictable factors including the market performance of the plans assets and future changes in interest rates that affect the actuarial measurement of the plans obligations.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Company manages its exposure to changes in short-term interest rates, particularly to reduce the impact on its floating-rate interest payments, by entering into interest rate swap agreements. We have interest rate swaps with fair values of approximately $5.6 million and $11.6 million outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The decrease in fair values since December 31, 2003 is primarily due to normal settlement of monthly payments due on swaps during the year ended December 31, 2004, as well the early termination of certain swaps and reductions in the fair value of the liability on outstanding swaps during the period.
The following table shows the activity of the Companys liability for interest rate swap agreements from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
$
11,586
(6,867
)
873
$
5,592
This interest rate swap liability is included in long-term liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Other than interest rate swaps, we do not have any other derivative instruments. We do not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had a fixed interest rate payment swap agreement outstanding in the amount of $50 million with a maturity date of 2008. In addition, at December 31, 2004, approximately $500 million of the Companys total borrowings, which mature in approximately four and seven years, are at fixed rates of interest. We do not believe that a moderate change in interest rates would have a material adverse impact on future earnings and cash flows of the Company.
Share Repurchases
On April 19, 1999, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 15 million shares of our common stock. Through December 31, 2004, approximately 9 million shares have been repurchased under this authorization.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING
ESTIMATES
General
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. For further information on the critical accounting policies, see Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Inventories - Provisions for Slow Moving and Obsolescence
The Company identifies slow moving or obsolete inventories and estimates appropriate loss provisions related thereto. Historically, these loss provisions have not been significant as the vast majority of the Companys inventories are not highly susceptible to obsolescence and are eligible for return under various vendor return programs. While the Company has no reason to believe its inventory return privileges will be discontinued in the future, its risk of loss associated with obsolete or slow moving inventories would increase if such were to occur.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Methodology
The Company evaluates the collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. Initially, the Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net sales based on historical bad debt experience. This initial estimate is periodically adjusted when the Company becomes aware of a specific customers inability to meet its financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filing) or as a result of changes in the overall aging of accounts receivable. While the Company has a large customer base that is geographically dispersed, a general economic downturn in any of the industry segments in which the Company operates could result in higher than expected defaults and, therefore, the need to revise estimates for bad debts. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded provisions for bad debts of $20.7 million, $23.8 million and $20.9 million, respectively.
Consideration Received from Vendors
The Company enters into agreements at the beginning of each year with many of its vendors providing for inventory purchase incentives and advertising allowances. Generally, the Company earns inventory purchase incentives and advertising allowances upon achieving specified volume purchasing levels or other criteria. The Company accrues for the receipt of inventory purchase incentives and advertising allowances as part of its inventory cost based on cumulative purchases of inventory to date and projected inventory purchases through the end of the year or, in the case of specific advertising allowances, upon completion of the Companys obligations related thereto. While management believes the Company will continue to receive consideration from vendors in 2005 and beyond, there can be no assurance that vendors will continue to provide comparable amounts of incentives and allowances in the future.
Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment and Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
At least annually, the Company evaluates property, plant and equipment and goodwill and other intangible assets for potential impairment indicators. The Companys judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions and operational performance. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that assets associated with a particular operation are impaired. Evaluating the impairment also requires the Company to estimate future operating results and cash flows which require judgment by management. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Employee Benefit Plans
The Companys benefit plan committees in the U.S. and Canada establish investment policies and strategies and regularly monitor the performance of the funds. The pension plan strategy implemented by the Companys management is to achieve long-term objectives and invest the pension assets in accordance with the applicable pension legislation in the U.S. and Canada, as well as fiduciary standards. The long-term primary objectives for the pension plan are to provide for a reasonable amount of long-term growth of capital without undue exposure to risk, protect the assets
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
from erosion of purchasing power and provide investment results that meet or exceed the pension plans actuarially assumed long term rate of return.
Based on the investment policy for the pension plans, as well as an asset study that was performed based on the Companys asset allocations and future expectations, the Companys expected rate of return on plan assets for measuring 2005 pension expense or income is 8.5% for the plans. The asset study forecasted expected rates of return for the approximate duration of the Companys benefit obligations, using capital market data and historical relationships.
The discount rate is chosen as the rate at which pension obligations could be effectively settled and is based on capital market conditions as of the measurement date. We have matched the timing and duration of the expected cash flows of our pension obligations to a yield curve generated from a broad portfolio of high-quality fixed income debt instruments to select our discount rate. Based upon this cash flow matching analysis, we selected a discount rate of 6.0% at December 31, 2004.
Net periodic cost for our defined benefit pension plans was $26,411,000, $17,688,000 and $661,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These expenses are included in SG&A expenses.
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The preparation of interim consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions for the amounts reported in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Specifically, the Company makes certain estimates in its interim consolidated financial statements for the accrual of bad debts, inventory adjustments and discounts and volume incentives earned. Bad debts are accrued based on a percentage of sales and volume incentives are estimated based upon cumulative and projected purchasing levels. Inventory adjustments are accrued on an interim basis and adjusted in the fourth quarter based on the annual October 31 book-to-physical inventory adjustment. The methodology and practices used in deriving estimates for interim reporting typically result in adjustments upon accurate determination at year-end. The effect of these adjustments in 2004 and 2003 was not significant.
The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle related to cash consideration from vendors in 2003, as discussed above, resulted in a decrease in net income in the first quarter of 2003 of $.12 per share. Without the cumulative effect adjustment, diluted earnings per share would have been $.51 in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
Dec. 31,
(in thousands except for per share data)
$
2,196,991
$
2,297,686
$
2,349,283
$
2,253,307
686,911
693,065
699,393
750,354
100,199
101,146
97,893
96,314
.57
.58
.56
.55
$
2,021,858
$
2,152,794
$
2,189,388
$
2,085,260
638,340
651,383
651,949
680,944
88,424
90,148
88,333
86,737
(19,541
)
68,883
90,148
88,333
86,737
.51
.52
.51
.50
.39
.52
.51
.50
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some statements in this report constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions that its forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The Company undertakes no duty to update its forward-looking statements, which reflect the Companys beliefs, expectations and plans as of the present. Actual results or events may differ materially from those indicated as a result of various important factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in general economic conditions, the growth rate of the market for the Companys products and services, the ability to maintain favorable supplier arrangements and relationships, competitive product and pricing pressures, including internet related initiatives, the effectiveness of the Companys promotional, marketing and advertising programs, changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting and taxation guidance, the uncertainties of litigation, as well as other risks and uncertainties discussed from time to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned that other factors not listed here or in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings could materially impact the Companys future earnings, financial position and cash flows. You should not place undue reliance upon forward-looking statements contained herein, and you should carefully read the other reports that the Company will, from time to time, file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
report of management
Genuine Parts Company
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related information included herein for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. The opinion of Ernst & Young LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, on those financial statements is included herein. The primary responsibility for the integrity of the financial information included in this annual report rests with management. Such information was prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the circumstances based on our best estimates and judgments and giving due consideration to materiality.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Genuine Parts Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Companys internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management and to the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the Companys published financial statements. The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
i. | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; | |||
ii. | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and | |||
iii. | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2004, the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on our assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 22.
Audit Committee Responsibility
The Audit Committee of Genuine Parts Companys Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and monitoring the Companys financial reports and accounting practices to ascertain that they are within acceptable limits of sound practice in such matters. The membership of the Committee consists of non-employee Directors. At periodic meetings, the Audit Committee discusses audit and financial reporting matters and the internal audit function with representatives of financial management and with representatives from Ernst & Young LLP.
/s/ Jerry W. Nix
JERRY W. NIX
Executive Vice President - Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
March 4, 2005
report of independent registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting
Board of Directors
Genuine Parts Company
We have audited managements assessment, included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Genuine Parts Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control/Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Genuine Parts Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Genuine Parts Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Genuine Parts Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Genuine Parts Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, and our report dated March 4, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst and Young LLP
March 4, 2005
Atlanta, Georgia
report of independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements
Board of Directors
Genuine Parts Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Genuine Parts Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Genuine Parts Company and subsidiaries at December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and
their cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004,
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
As discussed in Note 1, effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. In addition, as discussed in Note 2, effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Genuine Parts Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control/ Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 4, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst and Young LLP
March 4, 2005
Atlanta, Georgia
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands) December 31,
2004
2003
$
134,940
$
15,393
1,123,900
1,084,874
2,198,957
2,140,811
175,687
161,132
3,633,484
3,402,210
57,672
58,028
384,703
324,726
46,251
36,428
151,895
124,600
181,242
181,964
379,388
342,992
$
4,455,247
$
4,127,956
$
856,653
$
706,609
968
52,525
96,337
72,086
83,330
66,212
52,495
51,331
42,932
18,575
1,132,715
967,338
500,000
625,108
115,683
114,533
52,394
47,642
110,078
61,052
174,965
174,045
56,571
32,853
26,478
4,835
2,286,363
2,100,550
2,544,377
2,312,283
$
4,455,247
$
4,127,956
See accompanying notes.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data) Year ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
9,097,267
$
8,449,300
$
8,258,927
6,267,544
5,826,684
5,704,749
2,829,723
2,622,616
2,554,178
2,193,804
2,050,873
1,948,442
635,919
571,743
605,736
240,367
218,101
238,236
395,552
353,642
367,500
(19,541
)
(395,090
)
$
395,552
$
334,101
$
(27,590
)
$
2.26
$
2.03
$
2.11
(0.11
)
(2.27
)
$
2.26
$
1.92
$
(0.16
)
$
2.25
$
2.03
$
2.10
(0.12
)
(2.26
)
$
2.25
$
1.91
$
(0.16
)
174,687
173,995
174,369
973
485
735
175,660
174,480
175,104
See accompanying notes.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
Accumulated
Additional
Other
Total
Common Stock
Paid-In
Comprehensive
Retained
Shareholders
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Shares
Amount
Capital
Income (Loss)
Earnings
Equity
173,473,944
$
173,474
$
16,080
$
(46,094
)
$
2,201,663
$
2,345,123
(27,590
)
(27,590
)
(17,960
)
(17,960
)
3,532
3,532
(42,018
)
(202,294
)
(202,294
)
1,286,697
1,287
39,190
40,477
(389,434
)
(389
)
(11,226
)
(11,615
)
9,427
9
327
336
174,380,634
174,381
44,371
(60,522
)
1,971,779
2,130,009
334,101
334,101
54,864
54,864
10,493
10,493
399,458
(205,330
)
(205,330
)
280,821
280
5,575
5,855
(616,192
)
(616
)
(17,093
)
(17,709
)
174,045,263
174,045
32,853
4,835
2,100,550
2,312,283
395,552
395,552
27,202
27,202
2,786
2,786
(8,345
)
(8,345
)
417,195
(209,739
)
(209,739
)
1,498,002
1,498
42,097
43,595
2,518
2,518
(578,381
)
(578
)
(20,897
)
(21,475
)
174,964,884
$
174,965
$
56,571
$
26,478
$
2,286,363
$
2,544,377
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands) Year ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
395,552
$
334,101
$
(27,590
)
62,207
69,013
70,151
(1,656
)
(5,210
)
(25
)
19,670
27,354
43,995
19,541
395,090
2,688
2,565
2,315
8,590
1,254
4,468
(33,370
)
(21,735
)
(27,380
)
(28,406
)
20,232
(243,005
)
143,456
(43,230
)
88,215
(13,495
)
(1,700
)
(33,826
)
159,684
68,084
299,998
555,236
402,185
272,408
(72,077
)
(73,904
)
(64,758
)
7,140
13,619
10,137
(3,018
)
(14,990
)
(6,042
)
(67,955
)
(75,275
)
(60,663
)
555,848
935,000
1,021,168
(732,649
)
(1,047,976
)
(1,122,237
)
37,523
4,601
36,009
(208,575
)
(204,556
)
(201,150
)
(21,475
)
(17,709
)
(11,615
)
(369,328
)
(330,640
)
(277,825
)
1,594
(872
)
305
119,547
(4,602
)
(65,775
)
15,393
19,995
85,770
$
134,940
$
15,393
$
19,995
$
205,148
$
205,451
$
173,595
$
38,714
$
49,807
$
60,807
See accompanying notes.
notes to consolidated financial statements
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Genuine Parts Company and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries (the Company) is a distributor of automotive replacement parts, industrial replacement parts, office products and electrical/electronic materials. The Company serves a diverse customer base through more than 1,900 locations in North America and, therefore, has limited exposure from credit losses to any particular customer or industry segment. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and generally does not require collateral.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company. Income applicable to minority interests is included in selling, administrative and other expenses. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates and the differences could be material.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenues from product sales upon shipment to its customers.
Foreign Currency Translation
The consolidated balance sheets and statements of income of the Companys foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars at the current and average exchange rates, respectively. The foreign currency translation adjustment is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents.
Trade Accounts Receivable and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company evaluates the collectibility of trade accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. Initially, the Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net sales based on historical bad debt experience. This initial estimate is periodically adjusted when the Company becomes aware of a specific customers inability to meet its financial obligations (e.g. bankruptcy filing) or as a result of changes in the overall aging of accounts receivable. While the Company has a large customer base that is geographically dispersed, a general economic downturn in any of the industry segments in which the Company operates could result in higher than expected defaults, and, therefore, the need to revise estimates for bad debts. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company recorded provisions for bad debts of approximately $20,697,000, $23,800,000, and $20,900,000, respectively.
Merchandise Inventories, including Consideration Received from Vendors
Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for a majority of automotive parts, electrical/electronic materials and industrial parts, and by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for office products and certain other inventories. If the FIFO method had been used for all inventories, cost would have been approximately $226,914,000 and $187,444,000 higher than reported at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company identifies slow moving or obsolete inventories and estimates appropriate provisions related thereto. Historically, these losses have not been significant as the vast majority of the Companys inventories are not highly susceptible to obsolescence and are eligible for return under various vendor return programs. While the Company has no reason to believe its inventory return privileges will be discontinued in the future, its risk of loss associated with obsolete or slow moving inventories would increase if such were to occur.
The Company enters into agreements at the beginning of each year with many of its vendors providing for inventory purchase incentives and advertising allowances. Generally, the Company earns inventory purchase incentives and advertising allowances upon achieving specified volume purchasing levels or other criteria. The Company accrues for the receipt of inventory purchase incentives and advertising allowances as part of its inventory cost based on cumulative purchases of inventory to date and projected inventory purchases through the end of the year or, in the case of specific advertising allowances, upon completion of the Companys obligations related thereto. While management believes the Company will continue to receive consideration from vendors in 2005 and beyond, there can be no assurance that vendors will continue to provide comparable amounts of incentives and allowances in the future.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist primarily of prepaid expenses and amounts due from vendors.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets primarily represent the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in connection with business acquisitions.
notes to consolidated financial statements
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 142 requires that entities assess the fair value of the net assets underlying all acquisition-related goodwill on a reporting unit basis effective beginning in 2002. When the fair value is less than the related carrying value, entities are required to reduce the amount of goodwill. The approach to evaluating the recoverability of goodwill as outlined in SFAS No. 142 requires the use of valuation techniques utilizing estimates and assumptions about projected future operating results and other variables. The impairment only approach required by SFAS No. 142 may have the effect of increasing the volatility of the Companys earnings if additional goodwill impairment occurs at a future date.
SFAS No. 142 also requires that entities discontinue amortization of all purchased goodwill, including amortization of goodwill recorded in past business combinations. Accordingly, the Company no longer amortizes goodwill beginning in 2002.
Other Assets
Other assets consist primarily of a prepaid pension asset, an investment accounted for under the cost method and the cash surrender value of certain life insurance policies. The investment accounted for under the cost method was $21,400,000 at both December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Land and buildings include certain leases capitalized at December 31, 2004. Depreciation and amortization is primarily determined on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful life of each asset: buildings and improvements, 10 to 40 years; machinery and equipment, 5 to 15 years.
Long-Lived Assets Other Than Goodwill
The Company assesses its long-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment annually or whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. To analyze recoverability, the Company projects undiscounted net future cash flows over the remaining life of such assets. If these projected cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment would be recognized, resulting in a write-down of assets with a corresponding charge to earnings. Impairment losses, if any, are measured based upon the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets.
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consist primarily of certain benefit
and workers compensation liabilities, the fair value of an
interest rate swap agreement and obligations under capital leases.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of the
following:
(in thousands) December 31
2004
2003
$
38,813
$
11,611
(3,990
)
(6,776
)
(8,345
)
$
26,478
$
4,835
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable approximate their respective fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements, included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, was approximately $5,592,000 and $11,586,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The fair value of derivative financial instruments has been determined based on quoted market prices. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying amount for variable rate long-term debt approximates fair market value since the interest rates on these instruments are reset periodically to current market rates. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair market value of fixed rate long-term debt was approximately $534,000,000 and $543,000,000, respectively, based primarily on quoted prices for these or similar instruments. The fair value of fixed rate long-term debt was estimated by calculating the present value of anticipated cash flows. The discount rate used was an estimated borrowing rate for similar debt instruments with like maturities.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
From time to time, the Company uses interest rate swap agreements to synthetically manage the interest rate characteristics of a portion of its outstanding debt and to limit the Companys exposure to rising interest rates. The Company designates at inception that interest rate swap agreements hedge risks associated with future variable interest payments and monitors each swap agreement to determine if it remains an effective hedge. The effectiveness of the derivative as a hedge is based on a high correlation between changes in the value of the underlying hedged item. Ineffectiveness related to the Companys derivative transactions is not material. The Company records amounts to be received or paid as a result of interest rate swap agreements as an adjustment to interest expense. All of the Companys interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges. Gains or losses on terminations or redesignation of interest rate swap agreements are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to interest expense of the related debt instrument over the remaining term of the original contract life of the agreements. The Company does not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are classified as selling, administrative and other expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and totaled approximately $216,000,000, $202,000,000 and $200,000,000 in the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
Stock Compensation
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company prospectively adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock compensation. The adoption of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), had no significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Until January 1, 2003, the Company had elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related Interpretations in accounting for stock compensation. Under APB 25, no compensation expense is recognized if the exercise price of stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Note 7 contains a tabular presentation as if the Company had applied the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS 123, to all stock options.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and non-vested restricted stock awards. Options to purchase 5,219,000 and 679,000, shares of common stock at prices ranging from $32 to $38 per share were outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share in those years because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares at the time. At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the dilutive effect of options to purchase approximately 12,000, 39,000 and 56,000 shares of common stock, respectively, at an average exercise price of approximately $18 per share issued in connection with a 1998 acquisition have been included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share since the date of the acquisition.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. FIN 46, as revised in December 2003, requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied no later than December 31, 2003 for entities meeting the definition of special-purpose entities, and no later than fiscal periods ending after March 15, 2004 for all other entities under consideration.
In connection with the adoption of FIN 46, in June 2003, the Companys construction and lease facility was amended. Subject to the amendment, FIN 46 did not change the Companys accounting for the construction and lease facility. This construction and lease facility, expiring in 2008, contains residual value guarantee provisions and other guarantees which would become due in the event of a default under the operating lease agreement or at the expiration of the operating lease agreement if the fair value of the leased properties is less that the guaranteed residual value. The maximum amount of the Companys potential guarantee obligation at December 31, 2004 is approximately $83,880,000. The Company believes the likelihood of funding the guarantee obligation under any provision of the operating lease agreement is remote.
In addition to the construction and lease facility, the Company has relationships with entities that are required to be considered for consolidation under FIN 46. Specifically, the Company guarantees the borrowings of certain independently controlled automotive parts stores (independents) and certain other affiliates in which the Company has a minority equity ownership interest (affiliates). Presently, the independents are generally consolidated by an unaffiliated enterprise that has a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity. The Company has no voting interest or other equity conversion rights in any of the independents. The Company does not control the independents or the affiliates, but receives a fee for the guarantee. The Company has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary with respect to any of the independents and that the affiliates are not variable interest entities. The Companys maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these independents and affiliates is equal to the total borrowings subject to the Companys guarantee. At December 31, 2004, the total borrowings of the independents and affiliates subject to guarantee by the Company were approximately $169,000,000. These loans generally mature over periods from one to ten years. In the event that the Company is required to make payments in connection with guaranteed obligations of the independents or the affiliates, the Company would obtain and liquidate certain collateral (e.g. accounts receivable and inventory) to recover all or a portion of the amounts paid under the guarantee. To date, the Company has had no significant losses in connection with guarantees of independents and affiliates borrowings.
notes to consolidated financial statements
In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor (EITF 02-16). EITF 02-16 addresses accounting and reporting issues related to how a reseller should account for certain consideration received from vendors. Generally, certain consideration received from vendors is presumed to be a reduction of prices of the vendors products or services and should, therefore, be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customers income statement. However, under certain circumstances, this presumption may be overcome and recognition as revenue or as a reduction of other costs in the income statement may be appropriate. The Company, in certain circumstances, previously included funds of this type in selling, administrative and other expenses. Under the new method, vendor allowances for advertising and catalog related programs are generally considered a reduction of cost of goods sold. On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted EITF 02-16 and recorded a non-cash charge of $19.5 million ($.11 and $.12 per basic and diluted share, respectively), net of a tax benefit of $13.6 million, related to the capitalization of certain vendor consideration as part of inventory cost. Had the Company accounted for vendor considerations in accordance with EITF 02-16 in prior years, the capitalization of these vendor considerations would not have a significant impact on the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2002. In addition, as a result of the January 1, 2003 adoption of EITF 02-16, approximately $111 million and $102 million were reclassified from selling, administrative and other expenses to cost of goods sold in the consolidated statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In accordance with EITF 02-16, the income statement presentations for periods prior to January 1, 2003 have not been reclassified. Had the Company accounted for consideration received from vendors in accordance with EITF 02-16 in prior years, approximately $90 million would have been reclassified from selling, administrative and other expenses to cost of goods sold in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2002.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2), provides guidance under FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying FASB Statement No. 109. The Company has not yet completed evaluating the impact of the repatriation provisions. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, the Company has not adjusted its tax expense or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act.
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. We expect to adopt Statement 123(R) on July 1, 2005.
Statement 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:
1. | A modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of Statement 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. | |||
2. | A modified retrospective method which includes the requirements of the modified prospective method described above, but also permits entities to restate based on the amounts previously recognized under Statement 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures either (a) all prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of adoption. |
The Company adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2003 using the prospective method described in FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Currently, the Company uses the Black-Scholes formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees and expects to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model upon the required adoption of Statement 123(R) on July 1, 2005. Because Statement 123(R) must be applied not only to new awards but to previously granted awards that are not fully vested on the effective date, and because the Company adopted Statement 123 using the prospective transition method (which applied only to awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date), compensation cost for some previously granted awards that were not recognized under Statement 123 will be recognized under Statement 123(R). However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements. Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing
cash flows in periods after adoption. While the Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of operating cash flows recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were $6,072,000, $1,254,000, and $4,468,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
2. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS No. 142 requires that entities assess the fair value of the net assets underlying all acquisition-related goodwill on a reporting unit basis. When the fair value is less than the related carrying value, entities are required to reduce the amount of goodwill.
Within the Companys four reportable segments, the Company identified reporting units as defined in SFAS No. 142. The reporting units goodwill was tested for impairment during the first quarter of 2002 as required by SFAS No. 142 based on the expected present value of future cash flows approach. As a result of this valuation process, as well as the application of the remaining provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company recorded a transitional impairment loss of approximately $395.1 million ($2.27 basic loss per share and $2.26 diluted loss per share) as of January 1, 2002. This write-off was reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the Companys consolidated statement of income as of January 1, 2002. No tax benefits were recorded in connection with this goodwill impairment.
The Company performed an annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2004 and 2003, utilizing the present value of future cash flows approach to determine any potential goodwill impairment. The Company determined that goodwill was not impaired and, therefore, no impairment was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The Company also assessed finite-lived, identifiable intangible assets for impairment under an undiscounted cash flows approach and concluded there was no impairment for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 by reportable segment, as well as
other identifiable intangible assets, are summarized as follows:
Goodwill
Identifiable
Intangible
(in thousands)
Automotive
Industrial
Office Products
Assets
Total
$
21,617
$
30,308
$
2,131
$
4,649
$
58,705
862
862
(1,539
)
(1,539
)
21,617
31,170
2,131
3,110
58,028
(356
)
(356
)
$
21,617
$
31,170
$
2,131
$
2,754
$
57,672
3. Facility Consolidation, Impairment and Other Charges
In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Companys management approved a plan to close and consolidate certain Company-operated facilities, terminate certain employees, and exit certain other activities. The Company also determined that certain assets were impaired. During 2001, the Company recorded a charge of $107.8 million ($64.4 million, net of tax), of which $89.5 million were non-cash charges related to the plan. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had an accrual of $2.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively, recorded in accrued expenses relating to lease obligations still outstanding on closed facilities.
notes to consolidated financial statements
4. Credit Facilities
The principal amount of the Companys borrowings subject to variable rates before interest rate swap agreements totaled approximately $968,000 and $177,268,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the Companys outstanding borrowings was approximately 6.05% and 4.92% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In November 2004, the Company repaid in full a $125,000,000 financing with a consortium of financial institutions and insurance companies (the Notes) scheduled to mature in November 2010 with interest at Libor plus .50%, reset every six months. The proceeds of the Notes were primarily used to repay certain variable rate borrowings. The Company repaid the Notes with cash generated from operations.
On October 31, 2003, the Company obtained a $350,000,000 unsecured revolving line of credit with a consortium of financial institutions that matures in October 2008 and bears interest at Libor plus .30% (2.70% at December 31, 2004). At December 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under the line of credit. At December 31, 2003, $50,050,000 was outstanding under this line of credit.
Certain borrowings contain covenants related to a maximum debt-to-equity ratio, a minimum fixed-charge coverage ratio, and certain limitations on additional borrowings. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. Due to the requirements in certain states, the Company also had unused letters of credit of $47,500,000 and $38,500,000 outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Total interest expense for all borrowings was $37,260,000 in 2004, $51,538,000 in 2003 and $59,640,000 in 2002.
Amounts outstanding under the Companys credit facilities
consist of the following:
(in thousands) December 31
2004
2003
$
$
50,050
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
125,000
968
2,583
500,968
677,633
968
52,525
$
500,000
$
625,108
Approximate maturities under the Companys credit facilities
are as follows:
(in thousands)
$
968
250,000
250,000
$
500,968
5. Shareholders Equity
The Company previously had a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement. The agreement authorized a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a Right) for each share of the Companys Common Stock outstanding with each Right representing the right to purchase one ten-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock. On November 15, 2004, the Board voted to terminate these Rights effective November 30, 2004. The Rights were subject to the terms and conditions of a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1999 (the Rights Agreement), by and between the Company and SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, as Rights Agent. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Rights Agreement, the Boards action to terminate the Rights caused the Rights Agreement to simultaneously expire.
6. Leased Properties
The Company leases land, buildings and equipment. Certain land and building leases have renewal options generally for periods ranging from two to fifteen years. In addition, certain properties occupied under operating leases contain normal purchase options. The Company also has an $85,000,000 construction and lease facility. Properties acquired by the lessor are constructed and/or then leased to the Company under operating lease agreements. The total amount advanced and outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2004 was approximately $83,880,000. Since the resulting leases are accounted for as operating leases, no debt obligation is recorded on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Land and buildings includes $8,781,000 and $20,490,000, respectively, with accumulated depreciation of $5,583,000 for leases of distribution centers and stores capitalized at December 31, 2004. Expenses for capital leases were approximately $2,776,000, $2,103,000 and $1,879,000 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under the
capital and noncancelable operating leases with initial or
remaining terms of one year or more consisted of the following at
December 31, 2004:
Capital
Operating
(in thousands)
Leases
Leases
$
3,210
$
116,544
3,451
86,696
3,471
62,821
3,510
43,275
3,558
28,630
13,944
84,792
31,144
$
422,758
6,957
$
24,187
Rental expense for operating leases was approximately $132,493,000 in 2004, $117,652,000 in 2003 and $112,473,000 in 2002.
7. Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards
In 1999, the Company authorized the grant of options of up to 9,000,000 shares of common stock. In accordance with stock option plans approved by shareholders, options are granted to key personnel for the purchase of the Companys stock at prices not less than the fair market value of the shares on the dates of grant. Most options may be exercised not earlier than twelve months nor later than ten years from the date of grant.
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS 123, as amended, determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of SFAS 123. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 4.0%, 4.0%, and 4.1%; dividend yield of 3.7%; 3.6%, and 4.0%; annual volatility factor of the expected market price of the Companys common stock of 0.23, 0.25, and 0.22; an expected life of the options of 8 years; and turnover of 4.44% based on the historical pattern of existing grants.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123, as amended by
SFAS No. 148, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized
to expense over the options vesting period. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and income (loss) per
share if the fair value based method had been applied to all
outstanding and unvested awards in each period (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
Year ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
395,552
$
334,101
$
(27,590
)
1,566
13
(3,758
)
(5,688
)
(3,376
)
$
393,360
$
328,426
$
(30,966
)
$
2.26
$
1.92
$
(0.16
)
$
2.25
$
1.89
$
(0.18
)
$
2.25
$
1.91
$
(0.16
)
$
2.24
$
1.88
$
(0.18
)
A summary of the Companys stock option activity and related information are as follows:
2004
2003
2002
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Average
Average
Average
Shares
Exercise
Shares
Exercise
Shares
Exercise
(000s)
Price
(000s)
Price
(000s)
Price
6,913
$
30
7,590
$
29
6,045
$
28
1,270
33
20
32
3,155
32
(2,096
)
29
(500
)
23
(1,412
)
29
(328
)
32
(197
)
31
(198
)
34
5,759
$
31
6,913
$
30
7,590
$
29
3,092
$
30
4,171
$
29
3,361
$
28
$
6.94
$
6.92
$
5.72
2,689
3,631
3,454
notes to consolidated financial statements
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2004 ranged from approximately $21 to $36, except for 12,000 options granted in connection with a 1998 acquisition for which the exercise price is approximately $18. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of options outstanding is approximately 6 years.
In 1999, the Company entered into restricted stock agreements with two officers which provide for the award of up to 150,000 and 75,000 shares, respectively, during the period 1999 through 2004 based on the Company achieving certain increases in net income per common share and stock price levels. Through December 31, 2004, the two officers have earned 15,000 and 7,500 shares, respectively. The Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the fair market value of the stock on the award date over the remaining vesting period which expires in 2009.
In 2002, the Company granted approximately 3,155,000 Non-Qualified options with a ten year life which vest 1/3 per year beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. In 2004, the Company granted approximately 1,146,000 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARS) and 124,000 Restricted Stock Units (RSUS). SARS represent a right to receive the excess, if any, of the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of exercise over the grant price. RSUS represent a contingent right to receive one share of GPC common stock at a future date provided certain pre-tax profit targets are achieved.
8. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and amounts used for income tax
purposes. Significant components of the Companys deferred tax
assets and liabilities are as follows:
(in thousands)
2004
2003
$
109,602
$
101,129
117,617
112,164
80,377
73,446
28,043
23,731
20,466
24,896
246,503
234,237
136,901
133,108
21,218
18,575
$
115,683
$
114,533
The current portion of the deferred tax liability is included in income taxes payable in the consolidated balance sheets.
The components of income tax expense are as follows:
(in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
$
189,098
$
163,878
$
165,289
31,599
26,869
28,952
19,670
27,354
43,995
$
240,367
$
218,101
$
238,236
The reasons for the difference between total tax expense and
the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax
rate to income before income taxes and the cumulative effect of
accounting changes are as follows:
(in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
$
222,572
$
200,110
$
212,008
22,370
19,969
23,081
(4,575
)
(1,978
)
3,147
$
240,367
$
218,101
$
238,236
9. Employee Benefit Plans
The Companys defined benefit pension plans cover substantially all of its employees in the U.S. and Canada. The plan covering U.S. employees is noncontributory and benefits are based on the employees compensation during the highest five of their last ten years of credited service. The Canadian plan is contributory and benefits are based on career average compensation. The Companys funding policy is to fund amounts deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company also sponsors unfunded supplemental retirement plans covering employee postretirement
benefit plans. The Company uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension and other
postretirement benefit plans.
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
(in thousands)
2004
2003
2004
2003
$
943,023
$
827,379
$
24,408
$
10,018
35,740
32,488
460
90
60,039
57,520
1,256
481
2,338
2,005
3,297
3,209
(2,104
)
21,255
41,793
(483
)
17,689
6,496
12,641
(64
)
(33,033
)
(30,739
)
(6,233
)
(4,975
)
$
1,035,858
$
943,023
$
22,705
$
24,408
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the Companys defined benefit pension plans was approximately $841,392,000 and $731,025,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The assumptions used to measure the pension and other postretirement plan obligations for the plans
at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2004
2003
2004
2003
6.00
%
6.25
%
6.00
%
6.25
%
3.50
%
3.25
%
A 10% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was
assumed for 2005. The rate was assumed to decrease ratably to 5% in 2010 and thereafter.
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
(in thousands)
2004
2003
2004
2003
$
834,015
$
716,008
$
$
90,385
103,712
6,429
13,274
62,737
29,755
2,936
1,766
2,338
2,005
3,297
3,209
(33,033
)
(30,739
)
(6,233
)
(4,975
)
$
962,871
$
834,015
$
$
The fair values of plan assets for the Companys U.S. pension plans included in the above were $875,236,000 and $757,684,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
notes to consolidated financial statements
Following are the asset allocations for the Companys funded
pension plans at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the target
allocation for 2005, by asset category:
Target
Percentage of Plan
Allocation
Assets at December 31
Asset Category
2005
2004
2003
65
%
64
%
62
%
35
%
33
%
35
%
3
%
3
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the plan held 2,016,932 shares and 1,619,480 shares, respectively, of common stock of the Company with a market value of approximately $88,866,024 and $53,767,000, respectively. Dividend payments received by the plan on Company stock totaled approximately $2,147,542 and $1,903,000 in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Fees paid during the year for services rendered by parties-in-interest were based on customary and reasonable rates for such services.
The Companys benefit plan committees in the U.S. and Canada establish investment policies and strategies and regularly monitor the performance of the funds. The pension plan strategy implemented by the Companys management is to achieve long-term objectives and invest the pension assets in accordance with the applicable pension legislation in the U.S. and Canada, as well as fiduciary standards. The long-term primary objectives for the pension plan are to provide for a reasonable amount of long-term growth of capital, without undue exposure to risk, protect the assets from erosion of purchasing power, and provide investment results that meet or exceed the pension plans actuarially assumed long term rate of return.
Based on the investment policy for the pension plans, as well as an asset study that was performed based on the Companys asset allocations and future expectations, the Companys expected rate of return on plan assets for measuring 2005 pension expense or income is 8.5% for the plans. The asset study forecasted expected rates of return for the approximate duration of the Companys benefit obligations, using capital market data and historical relationships.
The following table sets forth the funded status of the plans and
the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at
December 31:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
(in thousands)
2004
2003
2004
2003
$
(72,987
)
$
(109,008
)
$
(22,705
)
$
(24,408
)
341,262
340,416
19,309
20,788
(1,115
)
(2,191
)
2,646
3,017
$
267,160
$
229,217
$
(750
)
$
(603
)
$
297,496
$
256,668
$
$
(30,336
)
(27,451
)
(750
)
(603
)
(14,112
)
688
13,424
$
267,160
$
229,217
$
(750
)
$
(603
)
For the pension benefits, the following table reflects the total benefits expected to be paid from the plans or the Companys assets. Of the pension benefits expected to be paid in 2005, $1,898,000 is expected to be paid from employer assets. Expected contributions reflect amounts expected to be contributed to funded plans. For other postretirement benefits, the above table reflects only the Companys share of the benefit cost without regard to income from federal subsidy payments received pursuant to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA). Expected MMA subsidy payments, which will reduce the Companys cost for the plan, are shown separately.
Information about the expected cash flows for the pension plans and other post retirement benefit
plans follows:
Other Postretirement Benefits
Net Employer
Pension
Contribution
Value Due to
(in thousands)
Benefits
(Excluding MMA Subsidy)
MMA Subsidy
$
31,235
$
$
31,794
3,014
33,802
3,124
(736
)
36,384
3,082
(797
)
39,442
3,020
(856
)
43,254
2,821
(477
)
288,424
10,483
(432
)
Net periodic benefit cost included the following components:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
(in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
2004
2003
2002
$
35,740
$
32,488
$
27,021
$
460
$
90
$
235
60,039
57,520
53,220
1,256
481
877
(81,962
)
(77,763
)
(77,690
)
(1,006
)
(3,145
)
(2,864
)
371
372
487
13,600
8,588
974
996
150
268
$
26,411
$
17,688
$
661
$
3,083
$
1,093
$
1,867
The assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit costs for the plans follow:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2004
2003
2002
2004
2003
2002
6.25
%
6.75
%
7.35
%
6.25
%
6.75
%
7.35
%
3.25
%
4.15
%
4.15
%
8.75
%
8.95
%
9.45
%
10.00
%
10.00
%
6.50
%
The effect of a one-percentage point change in the 2004
assumed health care cost trend is as follows:
(in thousands)
Decrease
Increase
$
(364
)
$
573
(3,900
)
5,861
The MMA was signed December 8, 2003 to make additional voluntary benefits available through Medicare. The federal government will begin making subsidy payments to qualifying employers in 2006. Effective July 1, 2004, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 (FSP 106-2), Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (which superseded FSP No. 106-1). FSP 106-2 provides authoritative guidance on accounting for the federal subsidy and other provisions of MMA. The adoption of FSP 106-2 reduced the Companys accumulated postretirement benefit obligations by approximately $6.2 million and resulted in an unrecognized actuarial gain of a similar amount. The adoption resulted in approximately a $417,000 reduction in postretirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The Company has a defined contribution plan that covers substantially all of its domestic employees. The Companys contributions are determined based on 20% of the first 6% of the covered employees salary. Total plan expense was approximately $6,034,000 in 2004, $5,674,000 in 2003 and $6,112,000 in 2002.
notes to consolidated financial statements
10. Guarantees
Certain operating leases expiring in 2008 contain residual value guarantee provisions and other guarantees which would become due in the event of a default under the operating lease agreement, or at the expiration of the operating lease agreement if the fair value of the leased properties is less than the guaranteed residual value. The maximum amount of the Companys potential guarantee obligation at December 31, 2004 is approximately $83,880,000. The Company believes the likelihood of funding the guarantee obligation under any provision of the operating lease agreements is remote.
As discussed in Note 1, the Company also guarantees borrowings of certain independents and affiliates. The total borrowings of the independents and affiliates subject to guarantee by the Company at December 31, 2004 were approximately $169,000,000. These loans generally mature over periods from one to ten years. In the event that the Company is required to make payments in connection with guaranteed obligations of the independents or the affiliates, the Company would obtain and liquidate certain collateral (e.g. accounts receivable and inventory) to recover all or a portion of the amounts paid under the guarantee. To date, the Company has had no significant losses in connection with guarantees of independents and affiliates borrowings.
11. Segment Data
The segment data for the past five years presented on page 14 is an integral part of these financial statements.
The Companys automotive segment distributes replacement parts (other than body parts) for substantially all makes and models of automobiles, trucks and buses.
The Companys industrial segment distributes a wide variety of industrial bearings, mechanical and fluid power transmission equipment, including hydraulic and pneumatic products, material handling components and related parts and supplies.
The Companys office products segment distributes a wide variety of office products, computer supplies, office furniture and business electronics.
The Companys electrical/electronic materials segment distributes a wide variety of electrical/electronic materials, including insulating and conductive materials for use in electronic and electrical apparatus.
Inter-segment sales are not significant. Operating profit for each industry segment is calculated as net sales less operating expenses excluding general corporate expenses, interest expense, equity in income from investees, goodwill and other amortization and minority interests. Net property, plant and equipment by country relate directly to the Companys operations in the respective country.
Corporate assets are principally cash and cash equivalents and headquarters facilities and equipment.
For the year ended December 31, 2001, Facility Consolidation and Impairment Charges discussed in Note 3 totaling approximately $12,900,000 have been classified as a reduction to operating profit of the office products segment for management reporting purposes. Additionally, for management purposes, net sales by segment excludes the effect of certain discounts, incentives and freight billed to customers. The line item other represents the net effect of the discounts, incentives and freight billed to customers which are reported as a component of net sales in the Companys consolidated statements of income.
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
JURISDICTION OF
NAME
% OWNED
INCORPORATION
89.6
%
INDIANA
100.0
%
GEORGIA
100.0
%
DELAWARE
100.0
%
GEORGIA
100.0
%
MICHIGAN
100.0
%
DELAWARE
100.0
%
KANSAS
100.0
%
GEORGIA
100.0
%
NEVADA
100.0
%
GEORGIA
100.0
%
ILLINOIS
51.0
%
GEORGIA
51.0
%
GEORGIA
49.0
%
NORTH CAROLINA
100.0
%
NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA
100.0
%
NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA
100.0
%
PUEBLA, MEXICO
100.0
%
GUADALAJARA, JALISCO, MEXICO
100.0
%
OTTAWA, ONTARIO
100.0
%
BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
100.0
%
QUEBEC, CANADA
100.0
%
FEDERAL, CANADA
100.0
%
FEDERAL, CANADA
100.0
%
ONTARIO, CANADA
100.0
%
QUEBEC, CANADA
100.0
%
QUEBEC, CANADA
100.0
%
QUEBEC, CANADA
100.0
%
FEDERAL, CANADA
100.0
%
QUEBEC, CANADA
100.0
%
FEDERAL, CANADA
EXHIBIT 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Genuine
Parts Company of our reports dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Genuine Parts Company, Genuine Parts Company managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Genuine Parts Company, included in the 2004 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Genuine Parts Company.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Genuine Parts Company listed in Item
15(d). This schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the date is March 4, 2005, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Genuine Parts
Company listed below of our reports dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Genuine Parts Company, Genuine Parts Company managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Genuine Parts Company incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule of
Genuine Parts Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Genuine Parts Company.
Registration Statement No. 33-62512 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan
Registration Statement No. 333-21969 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan
Registration Statement No. 333-61611 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Assumed Stock Options
Under the Electrical Insulation Suppliers, Inc. 1993 Incentive Plan
Registration Statement No. 333-76639 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Genuine Parts Company
1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan
/s/ Ernst and Young LLP
March 4, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Thomas C. Gallagher, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Genuine Parts Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;
4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to
the registrant,
including its
consolidated
subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others
within those entities,
particularly during the
period in which this
annual report is being
prepared;
b)
Designed such internal
control over financial
reporting, or caused
such internal control
over financial reporting
to be designed under our
supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance
regarding the
reliability of financial
reporting and the
preparation of financial
statements for external
purposes in accordance
with generally accepted
accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the
effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure
controls and procedures
and presented in this
annual report our
conclusions about the
effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the
end of the period
covered by this annual
report based on such
evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this annual
report any change in the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting that occurred
during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter of
2004 that has materially
affected, or is
reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a)
All significant
deficiencies and
material weaknesses in
the design or operation
of internal control over
financial reporting
which are reasonably
likely to adversely
affect the registrants
ability to record,
process, summarize and
report financial
information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or
not material, that
involves management or
other employees who have
a significant role in
the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Thomas C. Gallagher
Thomas C. Gallagher
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jerry W. Nix, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Genuine Parts Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;
4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures,
or caused such
disclosure controls and
procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure
that material
information relating to
the registrant,
including its
consolidated
subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others
within those entities,
particularly during the
period in which this
annual report is being
prepared;
b)
Designed such internal
control over financial
reporting, or caused
such internal control
over financial reporting
to be designed under our
supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance
regarding the
reliability of financial
reporting and the
preparation of financial
statements for external
purposes in accordance
with generally accepted
accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the
effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure
controls and procedures
and presented in this
annual report our
conclusions about the
effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the
end of the period
covered by this annual
report based on such
evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this annual
report any change in the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting that occurred
during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter of
2004 that has materially
affected, or is
reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a)
All significant
deficiencies and
material weaknesses in
the design or operation
of internal control over
financial reporting
which are reasonably
likely to adversely
affect the registrants
ability to record,
process, summarize and
report financial
information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or
not material, that
involves management or
other employees who have
a significant role in
the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Jerry W. Nix
Jerry W. Nix
Executive Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Genuine Parts Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. Gallagher, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | |||
2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Thomas C. Gallagher
|
||
Thomas C. Gallagher
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer March 7, 2005 |
EXHIBIT 32.2
STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Genuine Parts Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry W. Nix, Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | |||
2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Jerry W. Nix
|
||
Jerry W. Nix
Executive Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer March 7, 2005 |