UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended:
|
|
Commission File Number:
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
0-21258
|
Chicos FAS, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
59-2389435
|
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
11215 Metro Parkway, Fort Myers, Florida 33912
(Address of principal executive offices)
239-277-6200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
At November 22, 2005, there were 180,975,535 shares outstanding of Common Stock, $.01 par value per
share.
CHICOS
FAS, Inc.
Index
2
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 29,
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,121
|
|
|
$
|
14,426
|
|
Marketable securities, at market
|
|
|
382,160
|
|
|
|
251,199
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
5,106
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
101,531
|
|
|
|
73,223
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
12,935
|
|
|
|
9,429
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
16,149
|
|
|
|
11,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
540,530
|
|
|
|
364,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
|
7,078
|
|
|
|
6,055
|
|
Building and building improvements
|
|
|
33,087
|
|
|
|
29,286
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
178,210
|
|
|
|
140,360
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
201,141
|
|
|
|
166,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
|
419,516
|
|
|
|
341,797
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(119,577
|
)
|
|
|
(93,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
299,939
|
|
|
|
247,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
61,796
|
|
|
|
61,796
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
34,064
|
|
|
|
34,042
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
19,383
|
|
|
|
7,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
115,243
|
|
|
|
103,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
955,712
|
|
|
$
|
715,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
67,519
|
|
|
$
|
36,725
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
|
|
58,258
|
|
Current portion of deferred liabilities
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
151,043
|
|
|
|
95,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred liabilities
|
|
|
60,878
|
|
|
|
47,149
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
12,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noncurrent Liabilities
|
|
|
62,888
|
|
|
|
59,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
183,152
|
|
|
|
147,652
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
(4,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
561,077
|
|
|
|
411,556
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
741,781
|
|
|
|
560,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
955,712
|
|
|
$
|
715,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes.
3
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Sales
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Sales
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Sales
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Sales
|
|
Net sales by Chicos/Soma stores
|
|
$
|
816,672
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
$
|
658,472
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
$
|
277,601
|
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
$
|
226,129
|
|
|
|
83.8
|
|
Net sales by White House | Black Market stores
|
|
|
179,545
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
97,117
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
68,450
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
34,292
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Net sales by catalog & Internet
|
|
|
24,526
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
19,402
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
9,534
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Net sales to franchisees
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
6,340
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
1,028,845
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
781,331
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
358,665
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
269,773
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
394,935
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
296,605
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
133,308
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
|
101,568
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
633,910
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
484,726
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
225,357
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
|
|
|
168,205
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General, administrative and
store operating expenses
|
|
|
371,041
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
290,775
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
|
131,711
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
101,976
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
31,192
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
20,748
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
11,339
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
7,047
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
231,677
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
173,203
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
82,307
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
59,182
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
5,658
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
237,335
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
174,576
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
84,461
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
59,802
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
87,814
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
66,338
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
31,251
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
22,725
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
149,521
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
108,238
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
$
|
53,210
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
$
|
37,077
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharebasic
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common and common equivalent
sharediluted
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstandingbasic
|
|
|
180,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstandingdiluted
|
|
|
182,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes.
4
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
149,521
|
|
|
$
|
108,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, cost of goods sold
|
|
|
3,437
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, other
|
|
|
31,192
|
|
|
|
20,748
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(15,352
|
)
|
|
|
(2,252
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of stock options exercised
|
|
|
13,301
|
|
|
|
25,095
|
|
Deferred rent expense, net
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
Loss from disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Net change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(28,308
|
)
|
|
|
(24,536
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other, net
|
|
|
(5,135
|
)
|
|
|
(522
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
30,794
|
|
|
|
18,182
|
|
Accrued and other deferred liabilities
|
|
|
36,089
|
|
|
|
8,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
65,733
|
|
|
|
48,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
215,254
|
|
|
|
156,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities, net
|
|
|
(130,946
|
)
|
|
|
(107,305
|
)
|
Purchase of equity investment
|
|
|
(10,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of franchise store
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(87,103
|
)
|
|
|
(64,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(228,467
|
)
|
|
|
(172,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
16,908
|
|
|
|
20,255
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,990
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
16,908
|
|
|
|
13,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
(1,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
14,426
|
|
|
|
15,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
$
|
18,121
|
|
|
$
|
13,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net
|
|
$
|
78,698
|
|
|
$
|
36,121
|
|
See Accompanying Notes.
5
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Chicos FAS, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and notes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005,
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 8, 2005. The January 29, 2005 balance sheet amounts were derived from audited
financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report.
The Companys fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to January 31 and are designated by the
calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. Operating results for the thirty-nine weeks
ended October 29, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
entire year.
Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The original effective date
for adoption of SFAS No. 123R for the Company was July 31, 2005. However, in April, the SEC
announced the adoption of a new rule that amends the effective dates for SFAS No. 123R. The SECs
new rule allows companies to implement SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year,
instead of the next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005. Therefore, the Company
plans to adopt SFAS No. 123R effective for its 2006 fiscal year commencing on January 29, 2006.
The Companys net income, in future years, will be reduced as a result of the recognition of the
remaining amortization of the fair value of existing stock options (similar to what is disclosed as
pro-forma expense in Note 4) as well as the recognition of the fair value of all newly issued stock
options subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R, which is contingent upon the number of future
options granted and other variables.
Note 3. Common Stock Split
On February 22, 2005, the Company completed a two-for-one stock split by distributing one
additional share of the Companys common stock to each stockholder of record as of February 4,
2005, for every share of common stock then owned. All prior period share and per share amounts
presented in this report have been restated to give retroactive recognition to this two-for-one
common stock split.
Note 4. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic
value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations, including for purposes of valuing its
awards and recording the related compensation expense, if any.
6
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 4. Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the
Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No.
148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and Disclosure, to all stock-based
employee compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29,
|
|
|
October 30,
|
|
|
October 29,
|
|
|
October 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
149,521
|
|
|
$
|
108,238
|
|
|
$
|
53,210
|
|
|
$
|
37,077
|
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of taxes
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of taxes
|
|
|
(9,104
|
)
|
|
|
(7,463
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
(2,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, pro forma
|
|
$
|
141,155
|
|
|
$
|
100,775
|
|
|
$
|
50,332
|
|
|
$
|
34,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
Note 5. Net Income Per Share
Basic Earnings Per Share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding. Restricted stock grants to employees and directors are not
included in the computation of basic EPS until the securities vest. Diluted EPS reflects the
dilutive effect of potential common shares from securities such as stock options and unvested
restricted stock. The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted
EPS computations shown on the face of the accompanying consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29,
|
|
|
October 30,
|
|
|
October 29,
|
|
|
October 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic
|
|
|
180,217,818
|
|
|
|
178,079,160
|
|
|
|
180,638,524
|
|
|
|
178,722,284
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and unvested
restricted stock outstanding
|
|
|
1,897,354
|
|
|
|
1,964,944
|
|
|
|
1,917,280
|
|
|
|
1,515,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
182,115,172
|
|
|
|
180,044,104
|
|
|
|
182,555,804
|
|
|
|
180,237,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 5. Net Income Per Share (continued)
For the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2005, of the options then outstanding,
options to purchase 51,000 and 303,070 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the
computation of diluted EPS on the basis that such options were antidilutive. For the three and
nine month periods ended October 30, 2004, of the options then outstanding, options to purchase
445,800 and 237,800 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of
diluted EPS on the basis that such options were antidilutive.
During the three months ended October 29, 2005, options to purchase 196,070 shares of the
Companys common stock were granted pursuant to the Companys stock option plans, options to
purchase 198,330 were exercised and options to purchase 97,136 shares of common stock were
canceled. During the three months ended October 30, 2004, options to purchase 868,000 shares of
the Companys common stock were granted pursuant to the Companys stock option plans, options to
purchase 38,630 were exercised and no options to purchase shares of common stock were canceled.
During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, options to purchase 1,616,070 shares of the
Companys common stock were granted pursuant to the Companys stock option plans, options to
purchase 1,715,988 were exercised and options to purchase 172,774 shares of common stock were
canceled. During the nine months ended October 30, 2004, options to purchase 2,163,800 shares of
the Companys common stock were granted pursuant to the Companys stock option plans, options to
purchase 3,682,180 were exercised and options to purchase 193,208 shares of common stock were
canceled.
Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, certain of the Companys officers and
non-officers, its two non-officer inside directors, and several of its independent directors were
awarded restricted stock, pursuant to restricted stock agreements. A restricted stock award is an
award of common shares that is subject to certain restrictions during a specified period. The
Company holds the shares during the vesting period, and the grantee cannot transfer the shares
before the termination of that period. The grantee is, however, entitled to vote the common shares
and to receive dividends and other distributions thereon. Unearned compensation related to the
restricted stock awards is recorded as a component of stockholders equity and is amortized ratably
over the vesting period of the award.
As of October 29, 2005, there were 194,505 shares of restricted stock outstanding. The
restricted stock awarded to officers and non-officers vests entirely on the third anniversary of
the date of grant. The restricted stock awarded to non-officer inside directors and independent
directors vests pro-rata over a three-year period. Total compensation expense related to these
restricted stock grants of $5.3 million is being amortized over the vesting period, and
amortization expense for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 was $0.4 million
and $1.2 million, respectively.
8
CHICOS
FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 29, 2005
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 6. Subsequent Event
Subsequent to the end of the current period, the Company completed the purchase of 105 acres
in south Fort Myers, Florida for the location of a new corporate headquarters campus for a total
acquisition cost of $37.8 million, which includes all transaction costs and $5.4 million of road
impact fees. The Company is targeting commencement of construction of a new corporate headquarters
in 2006 or 2007 with the first phase targeted for completion as early as late 2007, but more likely
in 2008. Additionally, the Company completed the purchase of a facility adjacent to its Winder
campus distribution center to be used for direct to consumer fulfillment as the Company expands the
number of items available for the WH|BM and Soma by Chicos brands. These property purchases were
funded from the Companys existing cash and marketable securities balances.
9
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
Chicos FAS, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is a specialty retailer of
private label, sophisticated, casual-to-dressy clothing, intimates, complementary accessories, and
other non-clothing gift items operating under the Chicos, White House | Black Market (WH|BM) and
Soma by Chicos brand names.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto and the Companys 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.
Overview
The primary factors which historically have influenced the Companys profitability and success
have been its growth in number of stores, its growth in comparable store sales, and its strong
operating margin arising out of favorable gross margin and leverage of operating costs. In the
last five years the Company has grown from 200 stores as of January 29, 2000 to 743 stores as of
October 29, 2005, which includes the significant store growth resulting from the acquisition of
WH|BM in fiscal 2003. The Company continues to expand its presence through the opening of new
stores, the development of new opportunities such as Soma by Chicos and through the extension of
its merchandise line. The Company anticipates that its rate of growth (measured by overall growth
in sales, growth in comparable store sales, and other factors) can be expected to decrease
(including a decrease from the rate of overall sales growth experienced in recent years which has
been in the range of 40%), such anticipated decrease in rate of growth reflecting in large part the
Companys significantly increased size, its more manageable 25-30% net square footage growth goal
for fiscal 2006 and 20% goal in fiscal 2007 and the expectation that its same store sales increases
will moderate. Nevertheless, even at a reduced growth rate, the Company expects to continue its
ability to generate the necessary cash flow to fund its expansion and to take advantage of new
opportunities. The Company has no long-term debt and foresees no current need to incur long-term
debt to support its continued growth.
Factors that will be critical to determining the Companys future success include, among
others, managing the overall growth strategy, including the ability to open and operate stores
effectively in an increasingly competitive environment, maximizing efficiencies in the
merchandising, product development and sourcing processes, maintaining high standards for customer
service and assistance, maintaining the newness, fit and comfort in its merchandise offerings,
customer acceptance of new store concepts, effectively implementing the process of senior
management succession, and generating cash to fund the Companys expansion needs. In order to
monitor the Companys success, the Companys senior management monitors certain key performance
indicators, including:
|
|
|
Comparable same store sales growth
For the thirteen-week and thirty-nine week periods
ended October 29, 2005, the Companys comparable store sales growth (sales from stores open
for at least twelve full months, including stores that have been expanded or relocated
within the same general market) was 16.0% and 14.2%, respectively. The thirteen-week
increase of 16.0% follows a comparable store sales growth of 6.1% in the third quarter last
year, with 31 out of the Companys last 34 quarterly periods achieving at least double
digit increases in comparable store sales. The Company believes that comparable store
sales growth is a critical success factor and a positive
|
10
|
|
|
indication of the Companys ability to manage its expansion and its ability to open and
operate stores effectively.
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
For the thirteen-week and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29,
2005, gross profit percentage was 62.8% and 61.6%, respectively, compared to 62.3% and
62.0%, respectively, in the corresponding periods in the prior year. Gross profit
percentage for the third quarter improved over the comparable period of the prior year and
the first two quarters of fiscal 2005 primarily due to significantly improved initial
merchandise markups at the Chicos and WH|BM brands. On a year-to-date basis, gross profit
percentage is down from the prior period primarily due to the anticipated decrease in the
Companys outlet gross margin, which gross margin is more in-line with the outlet gross
margin experienced in years prior to fiscal 2004, and, to a lesser extent, from the
Companys continued investment in its Soma by Chicos brand.
|
|
|
|
|
Positive operating cash flow
For the thirty-nine week period ended October 29, 2005
(the current period), cash flow from operations totaled $215 million compared with $157
million for the prior years thirty-nine week period ended October 30, 2004 (the prior
period), representing an increase in cash flow growth of 37.3%. The Company believes that
a key strength of its business is the ability to consistently generate cash. Strong cash
flow generation is critical to the future success of the Company, not only to support the
general operating needs of the Company, but also to fund capital expenditures related to
new store openings, relocations, expansions and remodels, additional infrastructure costs
associated with the distribution center, costs associated with the Companys proposed new
corporate headquarters campus project, to continue funding implementation of improved
information technology tools and to fund strategic acquisitions that may arise from time to
time. See further discussion of the Companys cash flows in the Liquidity and Capital
Resources section.
|
|
|
|
|
Loyalty Clubs
Management believes that a significant indicator of the Companys
success is the growth of the Chicos loyalty program, the Passport Club and support for
such loyalty program from its personalized customer service training programs and its
marketing initiatives. For the thirteen-week and thirty-nine week periods ended October
29, 2005, the Company added approximately 97,000 and 293,000, net new permanent Passport
Club members, respectively, and approximately 301,000 and 909,000, net new preliminary
Passport Club members, respectively. The Company believes that the continued growth of its
Passport Club indicates that the Company is still generating strong interest from new
customers, many of whom tend to become long-term loyal customers, due in large part to the
Companys commitment to personalized customer service and constant newness of product.
|
|
|
|
|
The Company introduced a new frequent shopper program at its WH|BM stores during October 2004
called The Black Book. The Black Book loyalty program is similar to the Passport Club in
all key respects except that members become permanent upon spending $300, compared to $500
for the Passport Club. For the thirteen-week and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29,
2005, the Company added approximately 63,000 and 193,000, net permanent Black Book members,
respectively and approximately 188,000 and 672,000, net preliminary Black Book members,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Quality of merchandise offerings
To monitor and maintain the acceptance of its
merchandise offerings, the Company monitors sell-through levels, inventory turns, gross
margins and markdown rates on a classification and style level. Although the Company does
not disclose these statistics
|
11
|
|
|
for competitive reasons, this analysis helps identify comfort, fit and newness issues at an
early date and helps the Company plan future product development and buying.
|
|
|
|
The Company continues to evaluate and monitor the progress of its Soma by Chicos stores, its
intimate apparel initiative and it plans to open 20 additional Soma by Chicos stores in
fiscal 2006. The Company recognizes that the Soma by Chicos business can be seen as
complementary to its basic apparel business, but it also understands that many aspects of
this business require unique attention. The Company monitors Soma by Chicos merchandise
offerings in a manner similar to its other brands with special emphasis on repeat purchases.
The Company anticipates that additional investment will be required to establish the Soma by
Chicos brand as an acceptable business meeting the profitability goals of the Company over
the longer term. The Company believes the Soma by Chicos brand reduced the Companys
operating margin by approximately 60-70 basis points for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and
fiscal 2004, and the Company anticipates this could increase slightly in fiscal 2006
considering the additional new stores planned. The Company further believes that an impact
on operating margin of this order is acceptable when balanced against the possibility of the
brands perceived longer term growth potential.
|
For the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005, the Company reported net sales, operating
income and net income of $359 million, $82 million and $53 million, respectively, up 33.0%, 39.1%
and 43.5%, from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The Companys gross margin
increased to 62.8% for the current period from 62.3% in the prior comparable period mostly as a
result of improved initial markups on new merchandise at the Chicos and WH|BM front-line stores
offset, in part, by reduced margins in the Companys outlet division from those experienced in the
third quarter of fiscal 2004.
For the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005, the Company reported net sales, operating
income and net income of $1.0 billion, $232 million and $150 million, respectively, up 31.7%, 33.8%
and 38.1%, from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The Companys gross margin
decreased to 61.6% for the current period from 62.0% in the prior comparable period mostly as a
result of reduced margins in the Companys outlet division, and the impact of the gross margins at
the Soma by Chicos brand stores (which at this stage of development of the brand have tended to be
substantially lower than those associated with the Companys other front line brands).
Results of Operations Thirteen Weeks Ended October 29, 2005 Compared to the Thirteen Weeks Ended
October 30, 2004.
Net Sales
The following table shows net sales by Company-owned Chicos/Soma stores, net sales by
Company-owned WH|BM stores, net sales by catalog and Internet and net sales to franchisees in
dollars and as a percentage of total net sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005 (the
current period) and October 30, 2004 (the prior period) (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Net sales by Chicos/Soma stores
|
|
$
|
277,601
|
|
|
|
77.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
226,129
|
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
Net sales by WH|BM stores
|
|
|
68,450
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
34,292
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Net sales by catalog and Internet
|
|
|
9,534
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Net sales to franchisees
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
358,665
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
269,773
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Net sales by Company-owned stores increased in the current period from the prior period,
both in the aggregate and separately by brand, primarily due to new store openings, as well as the
current trend of strong increases in the Companys comparable store net sales (including stores
within the comparable store base that have been expanded or relocated within the same general
market). A summary of the factors impacting year-over-year sales increases is provided in the
table below (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Comparable store sales increases
|
|
$
|
40,752
|
|
|
$
|
11,792
|
|
Comparable same store sales %
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
New store sales increase, net
|
|
$
|
44,878
|
|
|
$
|
46,913
|
|
The comparable store sales increase of 16.0% was driven primarily by an increase in the
number of transactions in the current period compared to the prior period as well as an increase of
5.6% in the Chicos average unit retail price (which average unit retail price is a financial
indicator, the percentage change of which is believed by management to represent a reasonable
approximation of the percentage change in Company store net sales attributable to price changes or
mix). In the current period, WH|BM same store sales represented approximately 17% of the total
same store sales base compared to 11% in the prior comparable period. The WH|BM same store sales
increase for the current period was in the low fifty percent range while the Chicos same store
sales increase for the current period was in the low double digit range. Soma by Chicos stores
began entering into the comparable store sales calculation in September 2005 and due to the small
number of stores have not had a material impact on the comparable store sales calculation.
Net sales by catalog and Internet for the current period (which included Chicos and WH|BM
merchandise as well as a small offering of Soma by Chicos merchandise) increased by $2.5 million,
or 36.4%, compared to net sales by catalog and Internet for the prior period. It is believed that
the increase was principally attributable to the launch of the WH|BM website in August 2005
providing WH|BM customers with the opportunity to purchase merchandise over the Internet and
through its catalog and to a lesser degree, to increased sales of Chicos/Soma merchandise due to
increased catalog circulation.
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit
The following table shows cost of goods sold and gross profit in dollars and the related gross
profit percentages for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
133,308
|
|
|
$
|
101,568
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
225,357
|
|
|
|
168,205
|
|
Gross profit percentage
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
The increase in the gross profit percentage during the current period resulted primarily
from an increase in the merchandise margins of approximately 150 basis points at the Chicos
front-line stores and to a lesser extent, from an increase in the merchandise margins of
approximately 220 basis points at the WH|BM front-line stores. These merchandise margin increases
resulted primarily from significantly improved initial merchandise markups at Chicos front-line
stores, partially offset by increased markdown rates in the current period compared to the prior
period and, to a lesser extent, by improved initial merchandise markups and decreased markdown
rates at WH|BM front-line stores in the current period
13
compared to the prior period. The gross profit percentage improvement was offset, to a lesser
extent, by an anticipated year over year decrease in the merchandise margins at the Companys
outlet stores (which the Company believes reduced the overall gross margin percentage on a quarter
over quarter basis by approximately 30 basis points), and to a lesser extent, from increased
inventory clearance costs.
General, Administrative and Store Operating Expenses
The following table shows general, administrative and store operating expenses in dollars and
as a percentage of total net sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30,
2004 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
General, administrative and store operating expenses
|
|
$
|
131,711
|
|
|
$
|
101,976
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
The increase in general, administrative and store operating expenses was, for the most
part, the result of increases in the Companys store operating expenses, including associate
compensation, occupancy and other costs associated with additional store openings and, to a lesser
degree, other general corporate infrastructure costs to support the Companys rapid growth.
General, administrative and store operating expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 110
basis points over the prior period primarily due to significant leverage improvements at WH|BM
front-line stores (primarily personnel and occupancy costs) associated with the WH|BM comparable
store sales increase in the low fifty percent range, offset in part by, a slight deleveraging at
Chicos front-line stores, increased incentive compensation as a result of the Companys strong
financial performance and, to a lesser extent, by increased recruitment and relocation costs
related to the Companys continued expansion of its management team. General, administrative and
store operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was also positively impacted due to the
revision in the manner in which the Company accounts for construction allowances as described under
Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and Amortization
The following table shows depreciation and amortization in dollars and as a percentage of
total net sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar amounts
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
11,339
|
|
|
$
|
7,047
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was for the most part due to
capital expenditures related to new, remodeled and expanded stores. Depreciation and amortization
expense, in dollars and as a percentage of total net sales, was also impacted by the Companys
revision to the manner in which it accounts for construction allowances from landlords of
properties leased by the Company for its stores, which revision was first implemented in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2004. Previously, these construction allowances were amortized as a reduction of
depreciation expense, while the revision now has the amortization of these construction allowances
reducing the Companys rent expense (as previously described in General, Administrative and Store
Operating Expenses under the Managements Discussion
14
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the Companys 2004
Annual Report to Stockholders).
Interest Income, net
The following table shows interest income, net in dollars and as a percentage of total net
sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
$
|
2,154
|
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
The increase in net interest income during the current period was primarily the result of
the Companys increased cash and marketable securities position as well as the impact of higher
interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate for the current period was 37% compared to an effective tax
rate of 38% for the prior period. The decrease is primarily due to an increase in estimated
favorable permanent differences for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004.
Net Income
The following table shows net income in dollars and as a percentage of total net sales for the
thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
53,210
|
|
|
$
|
37,077
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
15
Results of Operations Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended October 29, 2005 Compared to the Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended October 30, 2004.
Net Sales
The following table shows net sales by Company-owned Chicos/Soma stores, net sales by
Company-owned WH|BM stores, net sales by catalog and Internet and net sales to franchisees in
dollars and as a percentage of total net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and
October 30, 2004 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Net sales by Chicos/Soma stores
|
|
$
|
816,672
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
658,472
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
%
|
Net sales by WH|BM stores
|
|
|
179,545
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
97,117
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Net sales by catalog and Internet
|
|
|
24,526
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
19,402
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Net sales to franchisees
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
6,340
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,028,845
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
781,331
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales by Company-owned stores increased in the current period from the prior period,
both in the aggregate and separately by brand, primarily due to new store openings, as well as the
current trend of strong increases in the Companys comparable store net sales (including stores
within the comparable store base that have been expanded or relocated within the same general
market). A summary of the factors impacting year-over-year sales increases is provided in the
table below (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Comparable store sales increases
|
|
$
|
105,303
|
|
|
$
|
66,744
|
|
Comparable same store sales %
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
New store sales increase, net
|
|
$
|
135,325
|
|
|
$
|
158,819
|
|
The comparable store sales increase of 14.2% was driven primarily by an increase in the
number of transactions in the current period compared to the prior period. This transaction volume
increase was offset, in part, by a decrease of 0.8% in the Chicos average unit retail price (which
average unit retail price is a financial indicator, the percentage change of which is believed by
management to represent a reasonable approximation of the percentage change in Company store net
sales attributable to price changes and mix). The WH|BM same store sales increase for the current
period was in the mid thirty percent range while the Chicos same store sales increase for the
current period was in the low double digit range. Soma by Chicos stores began entering the
comparable store sales calculation in September 2005 and due to the small number of stores have not
had a material impact on the comparable store sales calculation.
Net sales by catalog and Internet for the current period (which included mostly Chicos
merchandise, some WH|BM merchandise and a small offering of Soma by Chicos merchandise) increased
by $5.1 million, or 26.4%, compared to net sales by catalog and Internet for the prior period. It
is believed that the increase was principally attributable to the increased circulation of catalog
mailings and additional television spots in the current period versus the prior period and, to a
lesser extent, the launch of the WH|BM website in August 2005 providing WH|BM customers with the
opportunity to purchase merchandise over the Internet and through its catalog and to increased
sales of Chicos/Soma merchandise due to increased catalog circulation.
16
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit
The following table shows cost of goods sold and gross profit in dollars and the related gross
profit percentages for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
394,935
|
|
|
$
|
296,605
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
633,910
|
|
|
|
484,726
|
|
Gross profit percentage
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
The decrease in the gross profit percentage during the current period resulted primarily
from a decrease in the merchandise margins at the Companys outlet stores, from the Companys
continued investment in its Soma by Chicos brand, and to a lesser extent, from the Companys
continued investment in the product development and merchandising functions for all of its brands
as well as from increased inventory clearance costs. These decreases in gross profit percentage
were partially offset by an improvement of approximately 210 basis points in the merchandise
margins at WH|BM front-line stores. The improvement of merchandise margins at the WH|BM front-line
stores resulted primarily from improved initial markups on new products, moderated in part by a
slightly higher markdown rate compared to the prior period. The gross profit percentage for
Chicos front-line stores was essentially flat for the current period compared to the prior period.
General, Administrative and Store Operating Expenses
The following table shows general, administrative and store operating expenses in dollars and
as a percentage of total net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30,
2004 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
General, administrative and store operating expenses
|
|
$
|
371,041
|
|
|
$
|
290,775
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
The increase in general, administrative and store operating expenses was, for the most
part, the result of increases in the Companys store operating expenses, including associate
compensation, occupancy and other costs associated with additional store openings and, to a lesser
degree, an increase in marketing expenses and other general corporate infrastructure costs to
support the Companys rapid growth. General, administrative and store operating expenses as a
percentage of net sales decreased 110 basis points over the prior period primarily due to decreases
in Chicos and WH|BM store operating expenses (primarily in personnel and occupancy costs) as a
percentage of total net sales over the prior period which in turn resulted primarily from leverage
associated with the Companys current period comparable store sales increase of 14.2% and, to a
lesser degree, from planned decreased marketing costs as a percentage of total net sales and to the
revision in the manner in which the Company accounts for construction allowances as described under
Depreciation and Amortization. These decreases in general, administrative and store operating
expenses as a percentage of total sales were partially offset by increased incentive compensation
as a result of the Companys strong financial performance and, to a lesser extent, by increased
recruitment and relocation costs related to the Companys continued expansion of its management
team.
17
Depreciation and Amortization
The following table shows depreciation and amortization in dollars and as a percentage of
total net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
31,192
|
|
|
$
|
20,748
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was for the most part due to
capital expenditures related to new, remodeled and expanded stores. Depreciation and amortization
expense, in dollars and as a percentage of total net sales, was also impacted by the Companys
revision to the manner in which it accounts for construction allowances from landlords of
properties leased by the Company for its stores, which revision was first implemented in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2004. Previously, these construction allowances were amortized as a reduction of
depreciation expense, while the revision now has the amortization of these construction allowances
reducing the Companys rent expense (as previously described in General, Administrative and Store
Operating Expenses under the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations section of the Companys 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders).
Interest Income, net
The following table shows interest income, net in dollars and as a percentage of total net
sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
$
|
5,658
|
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
The increase in net interest income during the current period was primarily the result of
the Companys increased cash and marketable securities position as well as the impact of higher
interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate for the current period was 37% compared to an effective tax
rate of 38% for the prior period. The decrease is primarily due to an increase in estimated
favorable permanent differences for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004.
Net Income
The following table shows net income in dollars and as a percentage of total net sales for the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
149,521
|
|
|
$
|
108,238
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
18
Comparable Company Store Net Sales
Comparable Company store net sales increased by 16.0% in the current quarter and 14.2% in the
first nine months of this fiscal year, when compared to the comparable prior periods. Comparable
Company store net sales data is calculated based on the change in net sales of currently open
Company-owned stores that have been operated as a Company store for at least twelve full months,
including stores that have been expanded or relocated within the same general market area
(approximately five miles).
The comparable store percentages reported above include 42 and 54 stores, respectively, that
were expanded or relocated within the last twelve months from the beginning of the prior period by
an average of 963 and 948 net selling square feet, respectively. If the stores that were expanded
and relocated had been excluded from the comparable Company-owned store base, the increase in
comparable Company-owned store net sales would have been 15.2% for the current quarter and 13.2%
for the first nine months (versus 16.0% and 14.2% as reported, respectively). The Company does not
consider the effect to be material to the overall comparable store sales results and believes the
inclusion of expanded stores in the comparable store net sales to be an acceptable practice,
consistent with the practice followed by the Company in prior periods and by some other retailers.
WH|BM stores acquired in The White House, Inc. acquisition were included in the comparable store
sales calculation for the first time beginning in October 2004 and WH|BM stores opened since the
acquisition are treated the same as all other Company-owned stores. Soma by Chicos stores began
entering into the comparable store sales calculation in September 2005 and due to the small number
of stores have not had a material impact on the comparable store sales calculation.
The Company believes that the increase in comparable Company store net sales in the current
period resulted from the continuing effort to focus the Companys product development, merchandise
planning, buying and marketing departments on the Companys target customers. The Company also
believes that the look, fit and pricing policy of the Companys product was in line with the needs
of the Companys target customers. In addition, the Company believes that the increase in
comparable store sales was also fueled by a coordinated marketing plan, which includes national and
regional television advertising, national magazine advertising, increased direct mailings of
catalogs, a larger database of existing customers for such mailings and the success of the
Companys frequent shopper clubs. To a lesser degree, the Company believes the increase was due to
continued store-level training efforts associated with ongoing training programs, the Companys
overall ability to maintain its high standards for customer service and assistance and to an
increase in the average unit retails at both Chicos and WH|BM stores.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys primary ongoing capital requirements are for funding capital expenditures for
new, expanded, relocated and remodeled stores and increased merchandise inventories, for planned
future expansion of its headquarters and other central support facilities and for continued
improvement in information technology tools.
The following table shows the Companys capital resources as of October 29, 2005 and October
30, 2004 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 29, 2005
|
|
|
October 30, 2004
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,121
|
|
|
$
|
13,688
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
382,160
|
|
|
|
211,623
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
389,487
|
|
|
|
234,690
|
|
19
Working capital increased from October 30, 2004 to October 29, 2005 primarily due to the
Companys ability to generate significant cash from operating activities (partially due to the
Companys strong comparable store sales), which cash was more than necessary to satisfy the
Companys investment in capital expenditures. The significant components of the Companys working
capital are cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and inventories, reduced by accounts
payable and accrued liabilities.
Based on past performance and current expectations, the Company believes that its cash and
cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash generated from operations will satisfy the
Companys working capital needs, capital expenditure needs (see New Store Openings and Planned
Headquarters Expansion discussed below), commitments and other liquidity requirements associated
with the Companys operations through at least the next 12-24 months.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $215.3 million and $156.8 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. The cash provided by
operating activities for both periods was due to the Companys net income adjusted for non-cash
charges, tax benefits from non-cash tax deductions, and changes in working capital such as:
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense;
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefits;
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option exercises;
|
|
|
|
|
Normal fluctuations in accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid and other
current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
|
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $228.5 million and $172.8 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively.
The Companys investment in capital expenditures during the current period primarily related
to the planning and opening of new, relocated, remodeled and expanded Chicos and WH|BM stores
($62.5 million), costs associated with system upgrades and new software implementations ($8.4
million), distribution center infrastructure costs ($3.1 million) and other miscellaneous capital
expenditures ($13.1 million).
The Company invested $130.9 million, net in marketable securities during the current period.
In the prior period, the Company invested $107.3 million, net in marketable securities.
In addition, the Company purchased an equity investment in a privately held company for
business and strategic purposes totaling $10.4 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $16.9 million and $14.0 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. The Company received
proceeds in both periods from the issuance of common stock related to current and former employee
option exercises, director exercises and employee participation in its employee stock purchase
plan. During the prior period, the Company satisfied the remaining balances due on capital leases
assumed as a result of The White
20
House, Inc. acquisition totaling $1.3 million and repurchased 275,000 shares of its common stock at
a total cost of approximately $5.0 million.
During the first nine months of the current fiscal year, nineteen of the Companys thirty-six
current and former officers, its two non-officer inside directors, and three of its six independent
directors exercised an aggregate of 1,532,340 stock options at prices ranging from $1.5834 to
$22.15 and several employees and former employees exercised an aggregate of 183,648 options at
prices ranging from $0.1805 to $22.10. Also, during this period, the Company sold 45,376 and
46,597 shares of common stock during the March and September offering periods under its employee
stock purchase plan at prices of $25.04 and $29.51, respectively. The proceeds from these
issuances of stock, exclusive of the tax benefit realized by the Company, amounted to approximately
$16.9 million.
New Store Openings and Planned Headquarters Expansion
The Company plans to open approximately 20% net new store square footage in fiscal 2005, which
should represent approximately 105 net new Company-owned stores (100 of which were open as of
November 22, 2005). The Company believes that the liquidity needed for its planned new store
growth (including continued investments associated with the decision to grow its new concept, Soma
by Chicos), continuing remodel/expansion program, continued installation and upgrading of new and
existing software packages, and maintenance of proper inventory levels associated with this growth
will be funded from cash flow from operations and its existing strong cash and marketable
securities balances.
The Company also announced that it is planning to open approximately 25-30% net new store
square footage in fiscal 2006, taking into account approximately 150 net new Company-owned stores
and increased square footage from 30-40 relocations and/or expansions. It is currently anticipated
that new Chicos and WH|BM stores in 2006, for the most part, will be somewhat larger than the
average existing store size for the respective brand. Currently, the Company plans that
approximately 60 of these new stores will be Chicos stores, 20 as new Soma by Chicos stores and
70 as WH|BM stores.
Subsequent to the end of the current period, the Company completed the purchase of 105 acres
in south Fort Myers, Florida for the location of a new corporate headquarters campus for a total
acquisition cost of $37.8 million, which includes all transaction costs and $5.4 million of road
impact fees. The Company is targeting commencement of construction of a new corporate headquarters
in 2006 or 2007 with the first phase targeted for completion as early as late 2007, but more likely
in 2008. Additionally, the Company completed the purchase of a facility adjacent to its Winder
campus distribution center to be used for direct to consumer fulfillment as the Company expands the
number of items available for the WH|BM and Soma by Chicos brands. These property purchases were
funded from the Companys existing cash and marketable securities balances.
The Company further believes that its liquidity will be sufficient, based on the above, to
fund anticipated capital needs over the near-term. Given the Companys existing cash and
marketable securities balances and the capacity included in its bank credit facilities, the Company
does not believe that it would need to seek other sources of financing to conduct its operations or
pursue its expansion plans even if cash flow from operations should prove to be less than
anticipated or if there should arise a need for additional letter of credit capacity due to
establishing new and expanded sources of supply, or if the Company were to increase the number of
new Company-owned stores planned to be opened in future periods.
21
Seasonality and Inflation
Although the operations of the Company are influenced by general economic conditions, the
Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the results of operations
during the current or prior periods. The Company does not consider its business to be seasonal.
The Company reports its sales on a monthly basis in line with other public companies in the
womens apparel industry. Although the Company believes this regular reporting of interim sales
may provide for greater transparency to investors, the Company is concerned that these interim
results tend to be relied upon too heavily as a trend. For example, such factors as the weather
(numerous hurricanes in fiscal 2004 and 2005), national events (elections), international events
(9/11 and developments in Iraq), interest rates, increased oil and other energy costs, and similar
factors can significantly affect the Companys results for a particular period. In addition, the
Companys periodic results can be directly and significantly impacted by the extent to which the
Companys new merchandise offerings are accepted by its customers.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The critical accounting
matters that are particularly important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and
results of operations and require some of managements most difficult, subjective and complex
judgments are described in detail in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 29, 2005. The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires the Company
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis,
the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to customer product returns,
inventories, income taxes, insurance reserves, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There
have been no material changes in the critical accounting policies during the thirty-nine weeks
ended October 29, 2005.
Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results
This Form 10-Q may contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, which reflect the current views of the Company with respect to certain events
that could have an effect on the Companys future financial performance, including but without
limitation, statements regarding future growth rates of the established Company store concepts and
the launch of the Soma by Chicos concept. The statements may address items such as future sales,
gross profit expectations, planned store openings, closings and expansions, future comparable store
sales, future product sourcing plans, inventory levels, planned marketing expenditures, planned
capital expenditures and future cash needs. In addition, from time to time, the Company may issue
press releases and other written communications, and representatives of the Company may make oral
statements, which contain forward-looking information.
These statements, including those in this Form 10-Q and those in press releases or made
orally, may include the words expects, believes, and similar expressions. Except for
historical information, matters discussed in such oral and written statements, including this Form
10-Q, are forward-looking
22
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently
anticipated. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not
limited to, those discussed below and in the section Certain Additional Business Risk Factors
beginning on page 20 of the Companys most recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 8, 2005.
These potential risks and uncertainties include the financial strength of retailing in
particular and the economy in general, the extent of financial difficulties that may be experienced
by customers, the ability of the Company to secure and maintain customer acceptance of the
Companys styles and store concepts, the propriety of inventory mix and sizing, the quality of
merchandise received from vendors, the extent and nature of competition in the markets in which the
Company operates, the extent of the market demand and overall level of spending for womens private
label clothing and related accessories, the adequacy and perception of customer service, the
ability to coordinate product development with buying and planning, the ability of the Companys
suppliers to timely produce and deliver clothing and accessories, the changes in the costs of
manufacturing, labor and advertising, the rate of new store openings, the buying publics
acceptance of any of the Companys new store concepts, the performance, implementation and
integration of management information systems, the ability to hire, train, energize and retain
qualified sales associates and other employees, the availability of quality store sites, the
ability to expand headquarters and support facilities in an efficient and effective manner, the
ability to hire and train qualified managerial employees and address management succession, the
ability to effectively and efficiently establish and operate catalog and Internet sales, the
ability to secure and protect trademarks and other intellectual property rights, the ability to
effectively and efficiently operate the WH|BM and Soma by Chicos divisions, risks associated with
terrorist activities, risks associated with natural disasters such as hurricanes and other risks.
In addition, there are potential risks and uncertainties that are peculiar to the Companys
reliance on sourcing from foreign vendors, including the impact of work stoppages, transportation
delays and other interruptions, transportation costs, political or civil instability, imposition of
and changes in tariffs and import and export controls such as import quotas, changes in
governmental policies in or towards foreign countries, currency exchange rates and other similar
factors.
The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Litigation
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other
claims including proceedings under laws and government regulations relating to labor, product,
intellectual property and other matters, including the matters described in Item 1 of Part II of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes
are not predictable with assurance. Consequently, the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary
liability or financial impact with respect to these matters at October 29, 2005, cannot be
ascertained. Although these matters could affect the operating results of any one quarter when
resolved in future periods, and although there can be no assurance with respect thereto, management
believes that, after final disposition, any monetary liability or financial impact to the Company
would not be material to the annual consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The market risk of the Companys financial instruments as of October 29, 2005 has not
significantly changed since January 29, 2005. The Company is exposed to market risk from changes
in interest rates on any future indebtedness and its marketable securities. The Companys exposure
to interest
23
rate risk relates in part to its revolving line of credit with its bank; however, as of
October 29, 2005, the Company did not have any outstanding borrowings on its line of credit and,
given its strong liquidity position, does not expect to utilize its line of credit in the
foreseeable future except for its continuing use of the letter of credit facility portion thereof.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the
Companys periodic SEC filings. There were no significant changes in the Companys internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these disclosure controls and
procedures subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
Furthermore, there was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
during the quarterly period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company was named as defendant in a putative class action suit filed in May 2003 in the
Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Francisco,
Charissa Villanueva v.
Chicos FAS, Inc.
The Complaint alleges that the Company, in violation of California law, has
in place a mandatory uniform policy that requires its employees to purchase and wear Chicos
clothing and accessories as a condition of employment. Although the Company believed it had strong
defenses to the allegations in this case, the Company agreed to participate in a voluntary private
mediation on November 10, 2004. A settlement was reached at the mediation and on July 27, 2005,
the Court gave its preliminary approval to the settlement. The class members were notified of the
settlement and given until October 24, 2005 to submit notice of their intention to partake in or
opt out of the settlement. The settlement is still subject to the Courts final approval. The
Company does not believe the total settlement costs will have a material impact on the Companys
results of operations or financial condition.
The Company was named as the defendant in a suit filed in July 2004 in the Circuit Court of
Lee County, Florida,
Ajit Patel v. Chicos FAS, Inc.
The Complaint alleges that the
Company breached an implied contract with the plaintiff, the Companys former Vice President
Chief Information Officer, and, alternatively, that the Company fraudulently induced the plaintiff
to work for the Company. It is the Companys position that no contract, express or implied,
existed between the Company and the plaintiff and that the Company did not engage in any fraudulent
conduct
.
The Company has filed an answer denying the material allegations of the Complaint and the
parties are now engaged in the discovery process. Based on testimony and information that has been
obtained in the discovery process, the Company is asserting certain counterclaims against the
plaintiff. No trial date has been set. The Company believes the plaintiffs case is without merit
and will continue to vigorously defend the litigation and prosecute its counterclaims.
24
The Company was named as defendant in a putative class action suit filed in May 2005 in the
Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles,
Marie Nguyen v. Chicos FAS,
Inc.
The Complaint alleges that the Company, in violation of California law, requested or
required its customers, in connection with the sign-up process for its Passport Club and as such,
as part of a credit card transaction, to provide certain personal identifying information. The
Company filed an answer denying the material allegations of the Complaint. The Company does not
believe that the case has merit and, thus, does not believe that the case should have any material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
The Company was named as defendant in a putative class action suit filed in July 2005 in the
Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Bernardino,
Carol Schaffer v. Chicos
FAS, Inc.
et al
.
The Complaint alleges that the Company, in violation of California law,
failed to: (1) pay overtime wages, (2) permit rest periods, and (3) timely pay separation wages,
among other claims. The Company believes that the case is without merit, in large part because the
claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the settlement reached in the
Carmen Davis v.
Chicos FAS, Inc
. class action. Thus, the Company does not believe that the case should have
any material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations. The
Company timely filed its Answer to the Complaint.
The Company is not a party to any other legal proceedings, other than various claims and
lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, none of which the Company believes should have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Indemnification Agreement with David F. Walker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Chicos FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Chicos FAS, Inc. and Subsidiaries Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHICOS FAS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 29, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Scott A. Edmonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Edmonds
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 29, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charles J. Kleman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles J. Kleman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 29, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Michael J. Kincaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Kincaid
Senior Vice President Finance, Chief
Accounting Officer, and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
26
EXHIBIT
10.1
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
THIS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
(this Agreement) is made and entered into this
3
rd
day of
July, 2005
, by and between
David F. Walker
(the
Indemnified Party) and CHICOS FAS, INC., a Florida corporation (the Corporation).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, it is essential to the Corporation to retain and attract as Directors and/or
Executive Officers the most capable persons available; and
WHEREAS, the substantial increase in corporate litigation subjects directors and officers to
expensive litigation risks at the same time that the availability of directors and officers
liability insurance has been severely limited; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the statutory indemnification provisions of the Florida Business
Corporation Act and Article VII of the bylaws of the Corporation (the Article) expressly provide
that they are non-exclusive; and
WHEREAS, the Indemnified Party does not regard the protection available under the Article and
insurance, if any, as adequate in the present circumstances, and considers it necessary and
desirable to his service as a Director and/or Executive Officer to have adequate protection, and
the Corporation desires the Indemnified Party to serve in such capacity and have such protection;
and
WHEREAS, the Florida Business Corporation Act and the Article provide that indemnification of
Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation may be authorized by agreement, and thereby
contemplates that contracts of this nature may be entered into between the Corporation and the
Indemnified Party with respect to indemnification of the Indemnified Party as a Director and/or
Executive Officer of the Corporation.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements
contained in this Agreement, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. INDEMNIFICATION GENERALLY
.
(a)
Grant of Indemnity
. (i) Subject to and upon the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, the Corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified party in respect of
any and all costs, claims, losses, damages and expenses which may be incurred or suffered by the
Indemnified Party as a result of or arising out of prosecuting, defending, settling or
investigating:
(1) any threatened, pending, or completed claim, demand, inquiry, investigation,
action , suit or proceeding, whether formal or informal or brought by or in the right
of the Corporation or otherwise and whether of a civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative nature, in which the Indemnified Party may be or may have been involved
as a party or otherwise, arising out of the fact that the Indemnified Party is or was
a director, officer, employee, independent contractor or stockholder of the
Corporation or any of its Affiliates (as such term is defined in the rules and
regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933), or served as a director, officer, employee,
1
independent contractor or stockholder in or for any person, firm, partnership,
corporation or other entity at the request of the Corporation (including without
limitation service in any capacity for or in connection with any employee benefit
plan maintained by the Corporation or on behalf of the Corporations employees);
(2) any attempt (regardless of its success) by any person to charge or cause the
Indemnified Party to be charged with wrongdoing or with financial responsibility for
damages arising out of or incurred in connection with the matters indemnified against
in this Agreement; or
(3) any expense, interest, assessment, fine, tax, judgment or settlement payment
arising out of or incident to any of the matters indemnified against in this
Agreement including reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel, experts,
accountants, consultants and investigators (before and at trial and in appellate
proceedings).
(ii) The obligation of the Corporation under this Agreement is not conditioned in any way on
any attempt by the Indemnified Party to collect from an insurer any amount under a liability
insurance policy.
(iii) In no case shall any indemnification be provided under this Agreement to the Indemnified
Party by the Corporation in:
(1) Any action or proceeding brought by or in the name or interest of the
Indemnified Party against the Corporation; or
(2) Any action or proceeding brought by the Corporation against the Indemnified
Party, which action is initiated at the direction of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation.
(b)
Claims for Indemnification
. (i) Whenever any claims shall arise for
indemnification under this Agreement, the Indemnified Party shall notify the Corporation promptly
and in any event within 30 days after the Indemnified Party has actual knowledge of the facts
constituting the basis for such claim. The notice shall specify all facts known to the Indemnified
Party giving rise to such indemnification right and the amount or an estimate of the amount of
liability (including estimated expenses) arising therefrom.
(ii) Any indemnification under this Agreement shall be made no later than 30 days after
receipt by the Corporation of the written notification specified in Section 1(b)(i), unless a
determination is made within such 30 day period by (X) the Board of Directors by a majority vote of
a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the mater described in the notice of (Y)
independent legal counsel, agreed to by the Corporation, in a written opinion (which counsel shall
be appointed if such a quorum is not obtainable), that the Indemnified Party has not met the
relevant standards for indemnification under this Agreement.
(c)
Rights to Defend or Settle; Third Party Claims, etc
. (i) If the facts giving
rise to any indemnification right under this Agreement shall involve any actual or threatened claim
or demand against the Indemnified Party, or any possible claim by the Indemnified Party against any
third party, such claim shall be referred to as a Third Party Claim. If the Corporation
2
provides the Indemnified Party with an agreement in writing in form and substance satisfactory
to the Indemnified Party and his counsel, agreeing to indemnify, defend or prosecute and hold the
Indemnified Party harmless from all costs and liability arising from any Third Party Claim (an
Agreement of Indemnity), and demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Indemnified Party the
financial wherewithal to accomplish such indemnification, the Corporation may at its own expense
undertake full responsibility for the defense or prosecution of such Third Party Claim. The
Corporation may contest or settle any such Third Party Claim for money damages on such terms and
conditions as it deems appropriate but shall be obligated to consult in good faith with the
Indemnified Party and not to contest or settle any Third Party Claim involving injunctive or
equitable relief against or affecting the Indemnified Party of his properties or assets without the
prior written consent of the Indemnified Party, such consent not to be withheld unreasonably. The
Indemnified Party may participate at his own expense and with his own counsel in defense or
prosecution of a Third Party Claim pursuant to this Section 1(c)(i), and such participation shall
not relieve the Corporation of its obligation to indemnify the Indemnified Party under this
Agreement.
(ii) If the Corporation fails to deliver a satisfactory Agreement of Indemnity and evidence of
financial wherewithal within 10 days after receipt of notice pursuant to Section 1(b), the
Indemnified Party may contest or settle the Third Party Claim on such terms as it sees fit but
shall not reach a settlement with respect to the payment of money damages without consulting in
good faith with the Corporation. The Corporation may participate at its own expense and with its
own counsel in defense or prosecution of a Third Party Claim pursuant to this Section 1(c)(ii), but
any such participation shall not relieve the Corporation of its obligations to indemnify the
Indemnified Party under this Agreement. All expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred in
defending or prosecuting any Third Party Claim shall be paid promptly by the Corporation as the
suit or other matter is proceeding, upon the submission of bills therefore or other satisfactory
evidence of such expenditures during the pendency of any matter as to which indemnification is
available under this Agreement. The failure to make such payments within 10 days after submission
of evidence of those expenses shall constitute a breach of a material obligation of the Corporation
under this Agreement.
(iii) If by reason of any Third Party Claim a lien, attachment, garnishment or execution is
placed upon any of the property or assets of the Indemnified Party, the Corporation shall promptly
furnish a satisfactory indemnity bond to obtain the prompt release of such lien, attachment,
garnishment or execution.
(iv) The Indemnified Party shall cooperate in the defense of any Third Party Claim which is
controlled by the Corporation, but the Indemnified Party shall continue to be entitled to
indemnification and reimbursement for all costs and expenses incurred by him in connection
therewith as provided in this Agreement.
(d)
Cooperation
. The parties to this Agreement shall execute such powers of attorney
as may be necessary or appropriate to permit participation of counsel selected by any party hereto
and, as may be reasonably related to any such claim or action, shall provide to the counsel,
accountants and other representatives of each party access during normal business hours to all
properties, personnel, books, records, contracts, commitments and all other business records of
such other party and will furnish to such other party copies of all such documents as may be
reasonably requested (certified, if requested).
3
(e)
Choice of Counsel
. In all matters as to which indemnification is available to the
Indemnified Party under this Agreement, the Indemnified Party shall be free to choose and retain
counsel, provided the Indemnified Party shall secure the prior written consent of the Corporation
as to such selection, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(f)
Consultation
. If the Indemnified Party desires to retain the services of an
attorney prior to the determination by the Corporation as to whether it will undertake the defense
or prosecution of the Third Party Claim as provided in Section 1(c), the Indemnified Party shall
notify the Corporation of such desire in the notice delivered pursuant to Section 1(b)(i), and such
notice shall identify the counsel to be retained. The Corporation shall then have 10 days within
which to advise the Indemnified Party whether it will assume the defense or prosecution of the
Third Party Claim in accordance with Section 1(c)(i). If the Indemnified Party does not receive an
affirmative response within such 10-day period, he shall be free to retain counsel of his choice,
and the indemnity provided in Section 1(a) shall apply to the reasonable fees and disbursements of
such counsel incurred after the expiration of such 10-day period. Any fees or disbursements
incurred prior to the expiration of such 10-day period shall not be covered by the indemnity of
Section 1(a).
(g)
Repayment
. (i) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Agreement to the
contrary, if the Corporation has incurred any cost, damage or expense under this Agreement paid to
or for the benefit of the Indemnified Party and it is determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction from which no appeal may be taken that the Indemnified Partys actions or omissions
constitute Nonindemnifiable Conduct as that term is defined in Section 1(g)(ii), the Indemnified
Party shall and does hereby undertake in such circumstances to reimburse the Corporation for any
and all such amounts previously paid to or for the benefit of the Indemnified Party.
(ii) For these purposes, Nonindemnifiable Conduct shall mean actions or omissions of the
Indemnified Party material to the cause of action to which the indemnification under this Agreement
related is determined to involve:
(1) a violation of the criminal law, unless the Indemnified Party had reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was lawful and had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful;
(2) a transaction in which the Indemnified Party derived an improper personal
benefit;
(3) if the Indemnified Party is a director of the Corporation, a circumstance
under which the liability provisions of Section 607.0834 (or any successor or similar
statute) are applicable;
(4) willful misconduct or a conscious disregard for the best interests of the
Corporation (when indemnification is sought in a proceeding by or in the right of the
Corporation to procure a judgment in favor of the Corporation or when indemnification
is sought in a proceeding by or in the right of a stockholder); or
(5) conduct pursuant to then applicable law that prohibits such indemnification.
4
2. TERM.
This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by all parties and shall continue in full
force and effect until the date seven years after the date of this Agreement, or seven years after
the termination of the Indemnified Partys employment or term of office, whichever is later,
provided that such term shall be extended by any period of time during which the Corporation is in
breach of a material obligation to the Indemnified Party, plus ninety days. Such term shall also
be extended with respect to each Third Party Claim then pending and as to which notice under
Section 1(b) has theretofore been given by the Indemnified Party to the Corporation, and this
Agreement shall continue to be applicable to each such Third Party Claim.
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND AGREEMENTS OF THE CORPORATION
.
(a)
Authority
. The Corporation represents, covenants and agrees that it has the
corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations under
this Agreement. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement have been duly authorized by the Board of Directors
of the Corporation. This Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Corporation and is
enforceable against the Corporation in accordance with its terms.
(b)
Non-contestability
. The Corporation represents, covenants and agrees that it
will not initiate, and that it will use its best efforts to cause any of its Affiliates not to
initiate, any action, suit or proceeding challenging the validity or enforceability of this
Agreement.
(c)
Good Faith Judgment
. The Corporation represents, covenants and agrees that it will
exercise good faith judgment in determining the entitlement of the Indemnified Party to
indemnification under this Agreement.
4. RELATIONSHIP OF THIS AGREEMENT TO OTHER INDEMNITIES
.
(a)
Non-exclusivity
. (i) This Agreement and all rights granted to the Indemnified
Party under this Agreement are in addition to and are not deemed to be exclusive with or of any
other rights that may be available to the Indemnified Party under any Articles of Incorporation,
bylaw, statute, agreement, or otherwise.
(ii) The rights, duties and obligations of the Corporation and the Indemnified Party under
this Agreement do no limit, diminish or supersede the rights, duties and obligations of the
Corporation and the Indemnified Party with respect to the indemnification afforded to the
Indemnified Party under any liability insurance, the Florida Business Corporation Act, or under the
bylaws or the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation. In addition, the Indemnified Partys
rights under this Agreement will not be limited or diminished in any respect by any amendment to
the bylaws or the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation.
(b)
Availability, Contribution, etc
. (i) The availability or non-availability of
indemnification by way of insurance policy, Articles of Incorporation, bylaw, vote of stockholders,
or otherwise from the Corporation to the Indemnified Party shall not affect the right of the
Indemnified Party to indemnification under this Agreement, provided that all rights under this
Agreement shall be subject to applicable statutory provisions in effect from time to time.
5
(ii) Any funds received by the Indemnified Party by way of indemnification or payment from any
source other than from the Corporation under this Agreement shall reduce any amount otherwise
payable to the Indemnified Party under this Agreement.
(iii) If the Indemnified Party is entitled under any provision of this Agreement to
indemnification by the Corporation for some claims, issues or matters, but not as to other claims,
issues or matters, or for some or a portion of the expenses, judgments, fines or penalties actually
and reasonably incurred by him or amounts actually and reasonably paid in settlement by him in the
investigation, defense, appeal or settlement of any matter for which indemnification is sought
under this Agreement, but not for the total amount thereof, the Corporation shall nevertheless
indemnify the Indemnified Party for the portion of such claims, issues or matters or expenses,
judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement to which the Indemnified Party is
entitled.
(iv) If for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction from which no appeal can be taken
rules than the indemnity provided under this Agreement is unavailable, or if for any reason the
indemnity under this Agreement is insufficient to hold the Indemnified Party harmless as provided
in this Agreement, then in either event, the Corporation shall contribute to the amounts paid or
payable by the Indemnified Party in such proportion as equitably reflects the relative benefits
received by, and fault of the Indemnified Party and the Corporation and its Affiliates.
(c)
Allowance for Compliance with SEC Requirements
. The Indemnified Party acknowledges
that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expressed the opinion that indemnification
of directors and officers from liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the 1933 Act) is
against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and, is therefore, unenforceable. The
Indemnified Party hereby agrees that it will not be a breach of this Agreement for the Corporation
to undertake with the SEC in connection with the registration for sale of any stock or other
securities of the Corporation from time to time that, in the event a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Corporation of expenses incurred or paid by
a director of officer of the Corporation in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted in connection with such stock or other securities being registered, the
Corporation will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of competent jurisdiction on the question of whether or not such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue. The Indemnified Party further agrees that such submission to
a court of competent jurisdiction shall not be a breach of this Agreement.
5. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a)
Notices
. All notices, requests, demands and other communications which are
required or may be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been
duly given when received if personally delivered; when transmitted if transmitted by telecopy,
electronic telephone line facsimile transmission or other similar electronic or digital
transmission method; the day after it is sent, if sent by recognized expedited delivery service;
and five days after it is sent, if mailed, first class mail, postage prepaid. In each case notice
shall be sent to:
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If to the Indemnified Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David F. Walker
|
|
|
|
|
14388 Eagle Pointe Drive
|
|
|
|
|
Clearwater, FL 33762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If to the Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicos FAS, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
11215 Metro Parkway
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Myers, FL 33912
|
or to such other address as either party may have specified in writing to the other using the
procedures specified above in this Section 5(a).
(b)
Construction and Interpretation
. (i) This Agreement shall be construed pursuant
to and governed by the substantive laws of the State of Florida (and any provision of Florida law
shall not apply if the law of a state or jurisdiction other than Florida would otherwise apply).
(ii) The headings of the various sections in this Agreement are inserted for the convenience
of the parties and shall not affect the meaning, construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
(iii) Any provision of this Agreement which is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be prohibited, unenforceable or not authorized in any jurisdiction shall, as to such
jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition, unenforceability or
non-authorization without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof or affecting the validity,
enforceability or legality of such provision in any other jurisdiction. In any such case, such
determination shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and the remaining provisions
of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. If any provision or term of this
Agreement is susceptible to two or more constructions or interpretations, one or more of which
would render the provision or term void or unenforceable, the parties agree that a construction or
interpretation which renders the term or provision valid shall be favorable.
(iv) As used in this Agreement, (1) the word including is always without limitation; (2) the
words in the singular number include words of the plural number and vice versa; and (3) the word
person includes a trust, corporation, association, partnership, joint venture, business trust,
unincorporated organization, limited liability company, government, public body or authority and
any governmental agency or department as well as a natural person.
(c)
Entire Agreement
. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement, and supersedes
all prior agreements and understandings, oral and written, among the parties to this Agreement with
respect to the subject matter hereof.
(d)
Specific Enforcement
. (i) The parties agree and acknowledge that in the event
of a breach by the Corporation of its obligation promptly to indemnify the Indemnified Party as
provided in this Agreement, or breach of any other material provision of this Agreement, damages at
law will be an insufficient remedy to the Indemnified Party. Accordingly, the parties agree that,
in addition to any other remedies or rights that may be available to the Indemnified Party, the
Indemnified Party shall also be entitled, upon application to a court of competent
7
jurisdiction, to obtain temporary or permanent injunctions to compel specific performance of the
obligations of the Corporation under this Agreement.
(ii) There shall exist in such action a rebuttable presumption that the Indemnified Party has
met the applicable standard(s) of conduct and is therefore entitled to indemnification pursuant to
this Agreement, and the burden of proving that the relevant standards have not been met by the
Indemnified Party shall be on the Corporation. Neither the failure of the corporation (including
its Board of Directors or independent legal counsel) prior to the commencement of such action to
have made a determination that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because the
Indemnified Party has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor an actual determination by the
Corporation (including its Board of Directors or independent legal counsel) that the Indemnified
Party has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall (X) constitute a defense to the
action, (Y) create a presumption that the Indemnified Party has not met the applicable standard of
conduct, or (Z) otherwise alter the presumption in favor of the Indemnified Party referred to in
the preceding sentence.
(e)
Cost of Enforcement; Interest
. (i) If the Indemnified party engages the
services of an attorney or any other third party or in any way initiates legal action to enforce
his rights under this Agreement, including but not limited to the collection of monies due from the
Corporation to the Indemnified Party, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all
reasonable costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees before and at trial and in
appellate proceedings). Should the Indemnified Party prevail, such costs and expenses shall be in
addition to monies otherwise due him under this Agreement.
(ii) If any monies shall be due the Indemnified Party from the Corporation under this
Agreement and shall not be paid within 30 days from the date of written request for payment,
interest shall accrue on such unpaid amount at the rate of 2% per annum in excess of the prime rate
announced from time to time by Bank of America, or such lower rate as may be required to comply
with applicable law from the date when due until it is paid in full.
(f)
Application to Third Parties, Etc
. Nothing in this Agreement, whether express or
implied, is intended or should be construed to confer upon, or to grant to, any person, except the
Corporation, the Indemnified Party and their respective heirs, assignees and successors, any claim,
right or remedy under or because of this Agreement or in any provision of it. This Agreement shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest and assigns, heirs and
personal representatives, as the case may be, of the parties, including any successor corporation
resulting from a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization, sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Corporation, or any other transaction resulting in the
successor corporation assuming the liabilities of the Corporation under this Agreement (by
operation of law, or otherwise).
(g)
Further Assurances
. The parties to this Agreement will execute and deliver, or
cause to be executed and delivered, such additional or further documents, agreements or instruments
and shall cooperate with one another in all respects for the purpose of carrying out the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(h)
Venue; Process
. The parties to this Agreement agree that jurisdiction and venue
in any action brought pursuant to this Agreement to enforce its terms or otherwise with respect to
the relationships between the parties shall properly lie in the Circuit Court of the
8
Twentieth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida in and for Lee County or in the United States
District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division. Such jurisdiction and venue are
merely permissive; jurisdiction and venue shall also continue to lie in any court where
jurisdiction and venue would otherwise be proper. The parties agree that they will not object
that any action commenced in the foregoing jurisdictions is commenced in a forum non conveniens.
The parties further agree that the mailing by certified or registered mail, return receipt
requested, of any process required by any such court shall constitute valid and lawful service of
process against them, without the necessity for service by any other means provided by statute or
rule of court.
(i)
Counterparts
. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be considered an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
(j)
Waiver and Delay
. No waiver or delay in enforcing the terms of this Agreement
shall be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach. No action taken by the Indemnified Party
shall constitute a waiver of his rights under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHICOS FAS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Scott A. Edmonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Edmonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITNESSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robin A. Martin
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin A. Martin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patricia Hausle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia Hausle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name
|
|
|
9