UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
[X] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002
Commission file number: 000-33385
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
California
(State of incorporation)
2530 Red Hill Avenue, Santa Ana, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
33-0945304
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
92705-5542
(Zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (949) 223-1111
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Per Share
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Based on the closing price as reported on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, the aggregate market value of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates on April 30, 2002 (the last business day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $79,555,000. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each shareholder affiliated with a director or an executive officer have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of outstanding shares of the Registrants Common Stock as of December 31, 2002 was 12,844,909.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 17, 2003, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after October 31, 2002.
1
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements relating to future results of Calavo Growers, Inc. (including certain projections and business trends) that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. Forward-looking statements frequently are identifiable by the use of words such as believe, anticipate, expect, intend, will, and other similar expressions. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: increased competition, conducting substantial amounts of business internationally, pricing pressures on agricultural products, adverse weather and growing conditions confronting avocado growers, new governmental regulations, as well as other risks and uncertainties, including those set forth in Part I., Item 1 under the caption Risks Related to Our Business and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and those detailed from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
We engage in the procurement and marketing of avocados and other
perishable foods and the preparation and distribution of processed avocado
products. Our expertise in marketing and distributing avocados, processed
avocados, and other perishable foods allows us to deliver a wide array of fresh
and processed food products to food distributors, produce wholesalers,
supermarkets, and restaurants on a worldwide basis. Through our three operating
facilities in Southern California and two facilities in Mexico, we sort and
pack avocados procured in California and Mexico and prepare processed avocado
products. Additionally, we procure avocados internationally, principally from
Chile and New Zealand, and distribute other perishable foods, such as Hawaiian
grown papayas. These operations are reported by us in three different business
segments: California avocados, processed products, and international avocados
and perishable food products.
Our principal executive offices are located at 2530 Red Hill Avenue, Santa
Ana, California 92705; telephone (949) 223-1111. At October 31, 2002, we
employed approximately 589 employees worldwide.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common
and preferred shareholders of Calavo Growers of California (the Cooperative),
an agricultural marketing cooperative association, exchanged all of their
outstanding shares for shares of our common stock. Concurrent with this
transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo emerging as the
surviving entity. These transactions had the effect of converting the legal
structure of the business from a non-profit cooperative to a for-profit
corporation. All references herein to us for periods prior to the merger refer
to the business and operations of the Cooperative.
Available Information
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.calavo.com. During the third
fiscal quarter of 2003, we intend to begin making available our annual report
on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, along with our
annual report to shareholders and other information related to us, free of
charge, on this site as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically
file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Our internet website and the information contained
therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
California Avocados
Calavo was founded in 1924 to market California avocados. In California,
the growing area stretches from San Diego County to the northern region of
Santa Barbara County, with the majority of the growing areas located
approximately 100 miles north and south of Los Angeles County.
As of October 31, 2002, the Hass variety is the predominant avocado
variety marketed on a world-wide basis. California grown Hass avocados are
available year-round, with peak production periods occurring between May
through September. Other varieties have a more limited picking season and
command a lower retail price. Approximately 1,900 growers deliver avocados to
us on a routine basis, generally pursuant to a standard marketing agreement. In
recent years, the share of avocados handled by us has continued to increase
with approximately 37.2% of the 2002 California Hass avocado crop handled by us
based on results published by the California Avocado Commission. We attribute
the increase in our market share principally to the recruitment of new growers
that deliver their avocados to us and the competitiveness of the per pound
returns we pay to our growers.
Avocados delivered to our packinghouses are graded, sized, and packed for
delivery to customers. Our ability to estimate the size and timing of the
delivery of the annual avocado crop has a substantial impact on our costs and
the sales price we receive for the fruit. To that end, our field teams maintain
direct contact with growers and farm managers and coordinate harvest plans. The
feedback from our field teams and our marketing group is used in conjunction
with our sales department to establish and publish list prices used by our
direct sales force to solicit orders.
3
The storage life of fresh avocados is limited. It can range from one to
four weeks, depending upon the maturity of the fruit, the growing methods used,
and the handling conditions in the distribution chain.
The California avocado market is highly competitive with 12 major handlers
providing daily price quotes to growers. A marketing order enacted by the state
legislature is in effect for California grown avocados and provides the
financial resource to fund generic advertising and promotional programs that
benefit all packers. Although avocados handled by us are identifiable through
packaging materials and a Calavo brand name sticker, we believe that consumers
generally do not purchase avocados based on brand loyalty. Notwithstanding the
absence of brand loyalty, we have developed a series of marketing and sales
initiatives aimed at our largest customers that are designed to differentiate
our products and services from those offered by our competitors. Some of these
key initiatives are as follows:
We sell avocados to a diverse group of supermarket chains, wholesalers,
and other direct users. The recent consolidation in the supermarket industry
has led to fewer, but bigger buyers. In addition, limited sales are currently
being made through e-commerce distribution channels. We believe that our
largest customers will, over the long-term, require us and our competitors to
implement one or more e-commerce distribution solutions to facilitate their
procurement and inventory management programs. In our judgment, the shift to
e-commerce distribution channels by our largest customers will favorably impact
larger handlers like us, which have the ability and financial resources to
support these strategies. Our largest customers have also initiated the
practice of drafting short-term sales contracts that formalize their pricing
and volume requirements. Generally, these contracts contain provisions that
establish a price floor and/or ceiling during the contract duration. Again, in
our judgment, the shift by our largest customers to drafting sales contracts
benefits large handlers like us, which have the ability to fulfill the terms of
these contracts. During 2002, our 5 largest customers purchased 20.0% of our
sales, and the largest 25 customers represented 56.1% of all fresh avocado
sales.
A significant portion of our costs are fixed. Consequently, wide-ranging
swings in the volume of avocados delivered have a significant impact on the per
pound packing costs of avocados we handle. Generally, larger crops will result
in a lower per pound avocado cost. We believe that our cost structure is geared
to optimally handle larger avocado crops than we have handled in recent years.
Our strategy calls for continued efforts in aggressively recruiting new
growers, retaining existing growers, and procuring a larger percentage of the
California avocado crop.
Avocados delivered to us are grouped as a homogenous pool on a weekly
basis based on the variety, size, and grade. The proceeds we receive from the
sale of each separate avocado pool, net of a packing and marketing fee provided
to cover our costs and a profit, are paid back to the growers once each month
with all of the fruit received in a given week receiving the same return by
variety, grade, and size. The packing and marketing fee we withhold is
periodically determined and revised based on our estimated per pound packing
and operating costs, as well as an operating profit. Significant competitive
pressures dictate that we set the packing and marketing fee at the lowest
possible level to attract and retain both new and existing grower business. We
believe that, if net proceeds paid cease to be competitive, growers would
choose to deliver their avocados to alternate competitive handlers.
Consequently, we strive to deliver growers the highest return possible on
avocados delivered to our packinghouses.
4
Processed Products
In the 1960s and early 1970s, we pioneered the process of freezing
avocados and developing a wide variety of guacamole recipes that address the
diverse tastes of consumers and buyers in the food service industry. The
segment was originally conceived as a mechanism to stabilize the price of
California avocados by reducing the volume of avocados available to the market
place. However, with the introduction of low cost processed products delivered
from Mexican based processors, we realigned the segments strategy by shifting
the procurement of fruit used in preparing product and certain other processing
functions to Mexico. In 1995, we invested in a processing plant in Mexicali,
Mexico to derive the benefit of competitive avocado prices available in Mexico.
Our processing facility in Mexico includes a ripening, seed removal, and
pulp extraction operation. Our processing facility in Santa Paula, California
receives the pulp from Mexicali, adds ingredients, and packages the product in
plastic containers. The product is then frozen for storage with shipment to
warehouses and, ultimately, to our customers. We continue to evaluate our
existing cost structure in producing our processed products. In particular, we
are evaluating our production activities and reviewing opportunities to reduce
transportation and overhead costs that are duplicative in supporting two
operating facilities. We have not committed to, or developed, a time-line for
the implementation of any actions, if any, that we may take in restructuring
our production processes.
Our customers include both companies in the food service industry and the
retail business. Sales are made principally through a commissioned nationwide
broker network, which is supported by our regional sales managers. We believe
that our marketing strength is distinguished by providing quality products,
innovation, year-round product availability, strategically located warehouses,
and market relationships. During 2002, our largest 5 customers represented
50.2% of all sales, and the largest 25 customers represented 75.8% of sales.
The food service and retail industries have continued a trend of business
consolidation resulting in larger customers, but a smaller number of customers
for our processed products. To secure the ongoing business of some of our
largest customers, we have entered into certain rebate programs and exclusivity
agreements. Through October 31, 2002, we have made significant payments
representing both exclusivity fees and prepaid rebates to a major foodservice
distribution customer. We believe that the trend of requesting payments from
producers to secure either exclusivity or preferred status as a provider of
processed products will continue.
We continue to review trends that affect our customers needs and their
impact on the processed avocado business. In August 2001 we launched our individually
quick frozen avocado half product line. This product line provides food
service and retail customers with peeled avocado halves that are ripe and
suitable for immediate consummation. We also recently entered into an
equipment purchase agreement to acquire two ultra high pressure production
machines. The first of the two machines was installed in our Mexicali facility
and commissioned for operations in October 2002. This high pressure equipment
will allow us to deliver fresh guacamole to retail and food service customers.
Although the additions of these product offerings are fairly recent, we believe
that the purchase of this equipment will position our company to deliver the
widest available array of processed avocado products to our customers.
Consequently, we are currently the only single source company supplying the
complete range of processed avocado products including, frozen guacamole, ultra
high pressure treated guacamole, and frozen avocado halves to foodservice and
retail customers.
5
International Avocados and Perishable Food Products
Our international avocados and perishable food products segment leverages
on our expertise in the handling and marketing of California avocados. We
believe that the sales generated by this segment complement our offering of
California avocados to our customers and stabilize the supply of avocados
during seasons of low California production. We have experienced significant
revenue growth in this segment in fiscal 2002. Sales generated by this segment
include avocados procured outside of California and other perishable food
products, such as papayas. We procure international avocados subject to
marketing agreements entered into with growers and packers located in Mexico,
Chile, and New Zealand. In recent years, our distribution of other perishable
food products has generally been limited to papayas procured from a Hawaiian
packing operation which is owned by the Chairman of our Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and President. Some of the marketing agreements
governing the distribution of these products are based on consignment terms.
Although consignment terms have the effect of limiting our risk, the agreements
may require us to pay advances to growers for the fruit they have delivered.
Historical experience demonstrates that providing such advances results in our
acquiring full market risk for the product, as it is possible that our resale
proceeds may be less than the amounts we paid to the grower. This is a result
of the high level of volatility inherent in the avocado and perishable food
markets, which are subject to significant pricing declines based on the
availability of fruit in the market.
In 1996, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) established
a protocol whereby Mexican grown avocados are permitted to be imported, on a
restricted basis, into the United States. Restrictions imposed on the marketing
of the fruit, due to phytosanitary concerns, have limited the marketing of
Mexican avocados to 31 states from the middle of October to the middle of
April. In 1998, we invested in this market by building a packinghouse in
Uruapan, Mexico. We believe that our continued success in marketing Mexican
avocados is largely dependent upon securing a reliable, high-quality supply of
avocados at reasonable prices. Recently, the Mexican growers and government
have restricted the supply of avocados for export to the United States in order
to obtain higher field prices. Our continued profitability is subject to our
ability to secure a sufficient volume of avocados at reasonable prices to
recover our investment in the Mexican packing operations. We have also enjoyed
limited sales of Mexican avocados to Japan, Canada, and Europe. During 2002, we
packed and distributed approximately 30.6% of the avocados exported from Mexico
into the United States and 18.3% of the avocados exported from Mexico to
countries other than the United States based on our internal estimates.
We have made various advances to several Mexican growers to secure their
avocado harvests (principally October to April). Our ability to recover these
advances is largely dependent on the growers ability to deliver avocados to us
and is subject to inherent risks of farming, such as weather and pests. We have
advanced less than $1.0 million to Mexican growers, as of October 31, 2002, to
secure the delivery of their avocado crops.
In recent years, the volume of avocados exported by Chilean growers to the
United States has continued to increase. Chilean growers have increased avocado
plantings to capitalize on high returns available in the world-wide avocado
markets. Additionally, with the Chilean harvesting season being complementary
to the California season (August through January), Chilean avocados are able to
command competitive retail pricing in the market. During 2002, we distributed
22.2% of the Chilean imports into the United States based on our internal
estimates.
New Zealand also exports avocados into the United States. The harvest of
New Zealand avocados (August to December) overlaps with the Chilean and Mexican
harvest periods. Consequently, the introduction of avocados grown in New
Zealand has had the effect of increasing the volume of avocados in the
marketplace and increasing pressure on the retail prices. During 2002, we
distributed 18.4% of the New Zealand imports into the United States based on
our internal estimates.
We also distribute papayas packed by a company that is owned by our
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. In distributing
papayas, we have encountered significant competition from Mexico growers.
During 2002, we distributed approximately half of the papayas sold in the
continental United States based on our internal estimates.
During 1999, we discontinued distributing mangos in the United States as
we were unable to achieve adequate returns.
6
Sales and Other Financial Information by Business Segment and Product Category
Sales and other financial information by business segment is provided in
Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, which are included in this Annual
Report.
Patents and Trademarks
Our trademarks include the Calavo brand name and related logos. We also
utilize the following trademarks in conducting our business: Avo Fresco, Bueno,
Calavo Gold, Celebrate the Taste, El Dorado, Fresh Ripe, Select, Taste of
Paradise, The First Name in Avocados, Tico, and Triggered Avocados.
Working Capital Requirements
Generally, we make payments to our California avocado growers and other
suppliers in advance of collecting our accounts receivable. We bridge the
timing between vendor payments and customer receipts by using operating cash
flows and commercial bank borrowings. In addition, we provide crop loans and
other advances to some of our growers which are also funded through operating
cash flows and borrowings. We experience larger levels of commercial bank
borrowings during the California Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
With respect to our processed products business, we require working
capital to finance the production of our processed avocado products,
maintaining an adequate supply of finished product, and collecting our accounts
receivable balances. These working capital needs are financed through the use
of operating cash flows and bank borrowings.
Our international avocados and perishable food products business requires
working capital to finance the payment of advances to suppliers, and collection
of accounts receivable. These working capital needs are also financed through
the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings and are generally
concentrated during the Chilean Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
Backlog
Our customers do not place product orders significantly in advance of the
requested product delivery dates. Customers typically order perishable products
two to ten days in advance of shipment, and typically order processed products
within thirty days in advance of shipment.
Research and Development
We do not undertake significant research and development efforts. Research
and development programs, if any, are limited to the continuous process of
refining and developing new techniques to enhance the effectiveness and
efficiency of our processed products operations and the handling, ripening,
storage, and packing of fresh avocados.
Compliance with Government Regulations
The California State Department of Food and Agriculture oversees the
packing and processing of avocados and conducts tests for fruit quality and
packaging standards. All of our packages are stamped with the state seal as
meeting standards. Various states have instituted regulations providing
differing levels of oversight with respect to weights and measures, as well as
quality standards.
The USDA regulates and reviews imported food products. In particular, the
USDA regulates the distribution of Mexican avocados within 31 states in the
U.S. by requiring avocado importers and handlers to execute compliance
agreements. These agreements represent an acknowledgement by handlers of the
distribution restrictions placed on Mexican avocados and are used as a tool to
ensure compliance with existing regulations. From time-to-time, we have been
approached by USDA representatives in their oversight of the compliance
agreement process. We continue to consult with USDA representatives to ensure
that our systems of internal control provide a high level of reliability in
securing compliance agreements on behalf of our customers.
7
As a manufacturer and marketer of processed avocado products, our
operations are subject to extensive regulation by various federal government
agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the USDA and the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC), as well as state and local agencies, with respect to
production processes, product attributes, packaging, labeling, storage and
distribution. Under various statutes and regulations, these agencies prescribe
requirements and establish standards for safety, purity and labeling. In
addition, advertising of our products is subject to regulation by the FTC, and
our operations are subject to certain health and safety regulations, including
those issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Our manufacturing
facilities and products are subject to periodic inspection by federal, state
and local authorities.
As a result of our agricultural and food processing activities, we are
subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations. These laws and
regulations govern the treatment, handling, storage and disposal of materials
and waste and the remediation of contaminated properties.
We seek to comply at all times with all such laws and regulations and to
obtain any necessary permits and licenses, and we are not aware of any
instances of material non-compliance. We believe our facilities and practices
are sufficient to maintain compliance with applicable governmental laws,
regulations, permits and licenses. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that we
will be able to comply with any future laws and regulations or requirements for
necessary permits and licenses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and
regulations or obtain any necessary permits and licenses could subject us to
civil remedies including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures as well as
potential criminal sanctions.
Employees
As of October 31, 2002, we had approximately 589 employees, of whom
approximately 230 were located in the United States and 359 of whom were
located in Mexico. None of Calavos United States employees are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. Approximately 120 of Calavos Mexican
employees are represented by a union. No significant work stoppages have
occurred since commencing operations in Mexico.
The following is a summary of the number of salaried and hourly
employees as of October 31, 2002.
Although agriculture is a seasonal industry, avocados have a wider window
of production than most perishable commodities. Consequently, we employ hourly
personnel more routinely throughout the year when compared to other
agriculture-dependent companies.
Risks Related to Our Business
We are subject to increasing competition that may adversely affect our
operating results.
The market for avocados and processed avocado products is highly
competitive and affects each of our businesses. Each of our businesses is
subject to competitive pressures, including the following:
8
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
We conduct a substantial amount of business with growers and customers who
are located outside the United States. We purchase avocados from foreign
growers and packers, sell fresh avocados and processed avocado products to
foreign customers, and operate a packinghouse and a processing plant in Mexico.
For additional information about our international business operations, see the
Business section included in this Annual Report.
Our current international operations are subject to a number of inherent
risks, including:
We and our growers are subject to the risks that are inherent in farming.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by numerous factors
over which we have little or no control and that are inherent in farming,
including reductions in the market prices for our products, adverse weather and
growing conditions, pest and disease problems, and new government regulations
regarding farming and the marketing of agricultural products.
We are subject to rapidly changing United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations which govern the
importation of foreign avocados into the United States and the processing of
processed avocado products.
The USDA has established, and continues to modify, regulations governing
the importation of avocados into the United States. Our permits that allow us
to import foreign-sourced avocados into the United States generally are
contingent on our compliance with these regulations. Our results of operations
may be adversely affected if we are unable to comply with existing and modified
regulations and are unable to secure avocado import permits in the future.
9
The FDA establishes, and continues to modify, regulations governing the
production of processed avocado products. Our results of operations may be
adversely affected if we are unable to comply with existing and modified
regulations.
Our business could be adversely affected if we lost key members of our
management.
We are dependent on the efforts and performance of our current directors
and officers. If we were to lose any key members of management, our business
could be adversely affected. You should read the information under Executive
Officers in this Annual Report for additional information about our
management.
The acquisition of other businesses could pose risks to our profitability.
We intend to review acquisition prospects that would complement our
business. While we are not currently a party to any agreement with respect to
any acquisitions, we may acquire other businesses in the future. Future
acquisitions by us could result in accounting charges, potentially dilutive
issuances of equity securities, and increased debt and contingent liabilities,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the
market price of our common stock. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including
the assimilation of the acquired operations, diversion of managements
attention to other business concerns, risks of entering markets in which we
have limited prior experience, and the potential loss of key employees of
acquired organizations. We may be unable to successfully integrate businesses
or the personnel of any business that might be acquired in the future, and our
failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business and on
the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to competitively serve our customers is a function of reliable and
low cost transportation. Disruption of the supply of these services and/or
significant increases in the cost of these services could impact our operating
results.
We use multiple forms of transportation to bring our products to market.
They include ocean, truck, and air-cargo.
Disruption to the timely supply of these services or dramatic increases in
the cost of these services for any reason including availability of fuel for
such services, labor-disputes, or governmental restrictions limiting specific
forms of transportation could have an adverse effect on our ability to serve
our customers, and consumers and could have an adverse effect on our financial
performance.
We have invested significant resources in optimally equipping our Uruapan,
Mexico packinghouse facility. A recently filed lawsuit against the USDA may
further restrict access or eliminate entirely the availability of Mexican grown
avocados in the U.S. marketplace thereby impairing the value of our investment
in our Uruapan packinghouse.
During 2001 the California Avocado Commission and various other plaintiffs
filed a lawsuit against the USDA alleging that the scientific basis used to
expand the Mexican avocado import program was flawed. Further restrictions
placed on importing Mexican grown avocados into the US marketplace originating
from this, or any other lawsuit, would have the effect of significantly
impacting the volume of avocados packed at our facility. Absent optimal
packing volumes we may be unable to recover our fixed costs and be forced to
close our facility. Closure of our Uruapan packinghouse may result in
significant equipment impairment charges and additional charges associated with
exiting these operations.
Item 2. Properties
In addition to our corporate headquarters building, we own two
packinghouses and one processing facility in California and lease one
packinghouse and one processing facility in Mexico.
Our two California packinghouses handle all avocados delivered by
California growers. The Temecula, California facility was built in 1985 and has
been improved in capacity and efficiency since 1985. The Santa Paula,
California facility was purchased in 1955 and has had recent improvements
equivalent to our Temecula facility. We believe that the combined annual
capacity of the two packinghouses, under normal workweek operations, is
sufficient to pack the annually budgeted volume of California avocados
delivered to us by our growers.
Our Santa Paula, California processing facility was built in 1975 and had
a major expansion in 1988. The facility includes a storage freezer and is
sufficient to process our annual budgeted production needs.
10
Our Mexicali, Mexico processing plant was built in 1995 to our
specifications. Our lease commitment for this facility extends through 2004.
The annual capacity is sufficient to process our budgeted annual production
needs.
Our Uruapan, Mexico packinghouse, owned by the same landlord as our
Mexicali facility, was also built to our specifications. We are committed to
leasing the facility through 2008. This packinghouse enables us to handle in
excess of 50 million pounds per year of Mexican grown avocados.
Absent dramatic shifts in food processing and packaging technologies, we
believe that our facilities are sufficient to meet projected needs for the
foreseeable future without the need for significant additional capital
expenditures. We continue to explore alternatives to our administrative and
production facilities and, from time to time, evaluate opportunities to improve
our facility configuration and the strategic location of our offices and
buildings.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we become involved in legal proceedings that are
related to our business operations. We are not currently a party to any legal
proceedings that could have a material adverse effect upon our financial
position or results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter
ended October 31, 2002.
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of individuals
who hold positions as executive officers of our company. There are no family
relationships between any director or executive officer and any other director
or executive officer of our company. Executive officers are elected by the
Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board.
Lecil E. Cole
has been a member of our board of directors since February
1982 and has served as Chairman of the Board since 1988. Mr. Cole has also
served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since February 1999. He
served as an executive of Safeway Stores from 1964 to 1976 and as Chairman of
Central Coast Federal Land Bank from 1986 to 1996. Mr. Cole has served as
Chairman and President of Hawaiian Sweet, Inc. and Tropical Hawaiian Products,
Inc. since 1996. Mr. Cole farms a total of 4,430 acres in California and Hawaii
on which avocados, papayas, and cattle are produced and raised.
Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
has served as our Vice President and Corporate
Secretary since December 2001. From 1989 to 2001, Mr. Hombrecher served in the
assurance and advisory department with the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP and
most recently in the capacity of senior manager. Mr. Hombrecher is a Certified
Public Accountant.
Robert J. Wedin
has served as our Vice President, Sales & Fresh Marketing
since 1993. Mr. Wedin joined us in 1973 at our then Santa Barbara packinghouse.
Beginning in 1990 Mr. Wedin served as a director of the California Avocado
Commission for a period of ten years. Mr. Wedin currently is a board member of
Producesupply.org and serves as a member of this organizations executive
committee.
11
Alan C. Ahmer
has served as our Vice President since 1989. Mr. Ahmer
joined us in 1979 as a regional sales manager in our processed products
business.
Avi Crane
has served as our Vice President since 1999. From 1993 to 1999,
Mr. Crane was employed as a General Manager by a competitor, Chiquita Brands,
Inc., and from 1985 to 1993, he was employed as a Vice President by the
California Avocado Commission.
Gerard J. Watts
has served as our Vice President, North American
Operations since 1992. Mr. Watts joined us in 1981 at our Processed Products
Division. He was promoted to Packinghouse Manager in 1984 and assumed
responsibility for the design and construction of all phases of our Temecula,
California packinghouse. In 1990, he was promoted to Director of Fresh
Operations managing our field and packing operations. In 1998, Mr Watts assumed
responsibility for the design and construction of our state of the art packing
facility in Uruapan, Mexico and implemented processes for supporting the
procuring, packing and shipping of Mexican grown avocados to any global
location. Mr. Watts has also served on the California Avocado Commission
Industry Affairs Committee and as Member and Chairman of the California Avocado
Inspection Board.
12
We have established a proprietary marketing database that
facilitates a review of the performance of selective grocery stores.
Based on this data we are able to assist our customers in developing
programs that will increase their sales. Generally, we review the
performance of stores relative to others within the same geographic
area and make recommendations as to the size and display of avocados
within the produce section.
We have developed various display techniques and packages that
appeal to consumers and in particular impulse buyers. Some of our
techniques include the bagging of avocados and the strategic display
of the bags within the produce section. Our research has demonstrated
that consumers generally purchase a larger quantity of avocados when
presented in a bag as opposed to the conventional store displays. We
also believe that the value proposition of avocados in a bag provides
for a higher level of sales to grocery stores.
We recently announced the rollout
of our ProRipe
TM
avocado
ripening program. This proprietary program allows us to deliver
avocados with varying degrees of ripeness to our customer
specification. We believe that ripened avocados help our customers
address the consumers immediate needs and accelerate the sale of
avocados through their stores.
Salaried
Hourly
99
131
41
318
140
449
Our California avocado business is impacted by an increasing volume
of foreign grown avocados being imported into the United States.
Recently, there have been significant plantings of avocados in Mexico,
Chile, New Zealand, the Dominican Republic, and other parts of the
world, which have had, and will continue to have, the effect of
increasing the volume of foreign grown avocados entering the United
States market. Generally, an increase in foreign grown avocados in the
United States market has the effect of lowering prices for California
grown avocados and adversely impacting our results from operations.
Our California avocado business is subject to competition from other
California avocado handlers. If we are unable to consistently pay
California growers a competitive price for their avocados, these growers
may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers.
Our international avocados and perishable food products business is
impacted by competitors operating in Mexico. Generally, handlers of
Mexican grown avocados operate facilities that are substantially smaller
than our facility in Uruapan, Mexico. If we are unable to pack and
market a sufficient volume of Mexican grown avocados, smaller handlers
will have a lower per unit cost and be able to offer Mexican avocados at
a more competitive price to our customers.
Our international avocados and perishable food products business is
also subject to competition from other California avocado handlers that
market Chilean grown avocados. If we are unable to consistently pay
Chilean packers a competitive price for their avocados, these packers
may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers.
Our processed products business is impacted by competitors operating
exclusively in Mexico and in other areas of the world where lower
product costs can be achieved. If we are unable to produce a sufficient
volume of processed products at our existing facilities or successfully
restructure our processed operations to take advantage of low product
costs available in Mexico or elsewhere, our competitors may be able to
offer processed products at a more competitive price to our customers.
Our frozen guacamole products are also subject to increasing
competition from ultra high pressure treated guacamole being marketed by
a Mexican competitor. If we are unable to introduce a similar offering
of high pressure treated guacamole product, we may not be able to
maintain our existing market share of guacamole products.
Local economic and political conditions, including disruptions in
trading and capital markets;
Restrictive foreign governmental actions, such as restrictions on
transfers of funds and trade protection measures, including export
duties and quotas and customs duties and tariffs;
Changes in legal or regulatory requirements affecting foreign
investment, loans, taxes, imports, and exports; and
Currency exchange rate fluctuations which, depending upon the nature
of the changes, may make our domestic-sourced products more expensive
compared to foreign grown products or may increase our cost of obtaining
foreign-sourced products.
Name
Age
Lecil E. Cole
62
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
35
Vice President, Finance and Corporate Secretary
Robert J. Wedin
53
Vice President, Sales & Fresh Marketing
Alan C. Ahmer
54
Vice President, Sales, Food Service/Retail
Avi Crane
49
Vice President, International
Gerard J. Watts
44
Vice President, North America Operations
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
On March 18, 2002, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin
Board under the symbol CVGW. On July 22, 2002, our common stock began trading
on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol CVGW.
Prior to March 18, 2002, a public trading market did not exist for our
common stock. The stock was not listed on a securities exchange, and shares
were transferred only if federal and state securities registration exemptions
were satisfied. From time to time, we distributed to our shareholders lists of
shareholders who had indicated an interest in purchasing or selling shares of
stock, and the purchasing and selling shareholders then privately negotiated
the terms of such transactions.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and
low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin
Board and the Nasdaq National Market.
As of
October 31, 2002, there were 1,615 stockholders of record of our
common stock.
Dividend Policy
On October 22, 2002, our Board of Directors approved the establishment of
a new dividend policy. The new policy provides for annual dividend payments of
20 cents per share payable during the first quarter of each fiscal year.
Pursuant to this new policy, the Board of Directors authorized an initial
dividend payment of 20 cents per share on January 3, 2003 to our shareholders
of record on November 15, 2002.
During the year ended October 31, 2001, we paid dividends of approximately
$4,973,000, or $0.50 per share, to our shareholders. For additional information
pertaining to the Cooperatives historical cash dividend payments, see
Selected Consolidated Financial Data elsewhere in this Annual Report. On
February 15, 2002, we paid a 5% stock dividend to shareholders of record on
February 1, 2002.
13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary consolidated financial data (other than pounds
information) for each of the years in the five-year period ended October 31,
2002 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Calavo
Growers, Inc. and our predecessor, Calavo Growers of California. The selected
financial data as of and for the years ended October 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
have been restated to correct an error in the computation of income taxes
relating to the member business of Calavo Growers of California. See Note 14 to
our consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this
Annual Report for additional information about this restatement. Historical
results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected in any
future period. The following data should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that
are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
14
15
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations together with Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but
not limited to, those presented under Risks related to our business beginning
on page 8 and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
We are a leader in the distribution of avocados, processed avocado
products, and other perishable food products throughout the United States and
elsewhere in the world. Our history and expertise in handling California grown
avocados has allowed us to develop a reputation of delivering quality products,
at competitive prices, while providing a superior return to our growers. This
reputation has enabled us to expand our product offering to include avocados
sourced on an international basis, processed avocado products, and other
perishable foods. These operations are reported by us in three business
segments: California avocados, processed products, and international avocados
and perishable food products. We report our financial results on a November 1
to October 31 fiscal year basis to coincide with the California avocado harvest
season.
Our California avocado business grades, sizes, and packs avocados grown in
California for distribution and marketing to our customers. We operate two
packinghouses in Southern California that handled approximately 37.2% of
the California Hass avocado crop during
the 2002 fiscal year based on statistics obtained from the California Avocado
Commission. Our operating results and the returns we pay our growers are highly
dependent on the volume of avocados delivered to our packinghouses as a
majority of our costs are fixed. Our strategy calls for continued efforts in
aggressively recruiting new growers, retaining existing growers and procuring a
larger percentage of the California avocado crop to improve our results from
operations.
Our processed products business procures avocados, processes avocados into
a wide variety of guacamole products, and distributes the processed product to
our customers. We operate a processing plant in Mexico and a second facility in
Southern California. Our customers include both food service industry and
retail businesses. Our strategy calls for the development of new guacamole
recipes and other processed avocado products that address the diverse taste of
todays consumers. We also seek to expand our relationships with major food
service companies and develop alliances that will allow our products to reach a
larger percentage of the marketplace.
Our international and perishable food products business procures avocados
grown in Mexico, Chile, and New Zealand, as well as papayas grown in Hawaii. We
operate a packinghouse in Mexico that handled approximately 30.6% of the
Mexican avocado crop bound for the United States market during the 2001-2002
Mexican harvest season based on internal estimates. Additionally,
during the 2001-2002 Chilean avocado harvest
season, we handled approximately 22.2% of the Chilean avocado crop based on
internal estimates. Our strategy is to procure and sell the internationally
grown avocados to complement our distribution efforts in support of California
grown avocados. We believe that the introduction of these avocados, although
competitive at times with California grown avocados, provides a level of supply
stability that may in the long term solidify the demand for avocados among
consumers in the United States and elsewhere in the world. Our efforts in
distributing papayas grown in Hawaii complement our offerings of avocados. From
time to time, we continue to explore distribution of other crops that provide
reasonable returns to the business.
Our California avocado and international and perishable food product
businesses are highly cyclical and characterized by rapid crop volume and price
changes. Furthermore, the operating results of all of our businesses, including
our processed product business, have been, and will continue to be, affected by
substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and market downturns due to a
number of factors, such as pests and disease, weather patterns, changes in
demand by consumers, the timing of the receipt, reduction, or cancellation of
significant customer orders, the gain or loss of significant customers, market
acceptance of our products and our customers products, our ability to develop, introduce, and market new
products on a timely basis, availability and cost of avocados and supplies from
growers and vendors, new product introductions by our competitors, change in
the mix of avocados and processed products we sell, and general economic
conditions. However, we believe that we are currently positioned to address
these risks and deliver favorable operating results for the foreseeable future.
16
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common
and preferred shareholders of Calavo Growers of California, an agricultural
marketing cooperative association, exchanged all of their outstanding shares
for shares of our common stock. Concurrently with this transaction, the
Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo emerging as the surviving entity.
These transactions had the effect of converting the legal structure of the
business from a non-profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. The merger
and the conversion were approved on an overwhelming basis by both the
Cooperatives shareholders and our board of directors. Prior to the merger, the
Cooperative reported results of operations as constituting either member (the
packing and distribution of avocados procured from either members or associate
members) or non-member business (non-member business included both the
processed product business and the sourcing and distribution of all crops that
were not procured from the Cooperatives members). We have realigned our
businesses to combine within our California avocado segment the results of
operations of both the California avocados grown previously by members and
those that were procured from non-members. We believe that this presentation
provides an enhanced view of the results of our California operations and a
better framework to evaluate the results of our various operations.
Recent Developments
In January 2002, members of the Board of Directors elected to exercise
options to purchase 1,005,000 shares of common stock pursuant to our directors
stock option plan. Some of our directors chose to pay the exercise price of
$5.00 per share by executing full-recourse promissory notes and/or delivering
cash consideration. The exercise of these stock options and the eventual
repayment of these notes will have the effect of increasing our total assets
and shareholders equity by approximately $5.0 million.
On February 15, 2002, we paid a 5% stock dividend to all shareholders of
record as of February 1, 2002. Basic and diluted earnings per share for all
periods presented have been restated to reflect the stock dividend.
On March 18, 2002, our shareholders approved an employee stock plan
whereby employees were granted the opportunity to purchase our common stock. On
March 28, 2002, we awarded selected employees the opportunity to purchase
approximately 473,000 shares of common stock at $7.00 per share, the closing
price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant. The plan also
provides for us to advance some, or all, of the purchase price of the purchased
stock to the employee upon the execution of a full-recourse promissory note at
prevailing interest rates. Through the expiration date of the awards, 84
employees had elected to purchase approximately 279,000 shares of our common
stock.
On July 19, 2002, the Nasdaq National Market approved our application for
listing our common stock. Our shares began trading on the Nasdaq National
Market on July 22, 2002 under the symbol CVGW.
On August 30, 2002, we completed a rights offering to sell 1,000,000
shares of common stock at a price of $5.00 per share to shareholders of record
on July 29, 2002. Proceeds from the rights offering to shareholders generated
$5,000,000 in cash, less offering costs of approximately $290,000.
On October 22, 2002, our Board of Directors approved the establishment of
a new dividend policy. The new policy provides for annual dividend payments of
20 cents per share payable during the first quarter of each fiscal year.
Pursuant to this new policy, the Board of Directors authorized an initial
dividend payment of 20 cents per share on January 3, 2003 to our shareholders
of record on November 15, 2002.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we
re-evaluate all of our estimates, including those related to the areas of
customer and grower receivables, inventories, useful lives of property, plant
and equipment, trade promotions, income taxes, retirement benefits, and
commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions as additional information becomes
available in future periods.
17
Management has discussed the development and
selection of critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our
disclosure relating to critical accounting policies and estimates in this
Annual Report.
We believe the following are the more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Grower Advances.
We advance funds to third-party growers primarily in
California and Mexico for various farming needs. These advances are generally
secured with a crop lien or other collateral owned by the grower. We
continuously evaluate the ability of these growers to repay advances and the
fair value of the collateral in order to evaluate the possible need to record
an allowance.
Trade Promotions.
Trade promotions are an important component of the sales
and marketing of our products, and are critical to the support of our business.
Trade promotion costs include amounts paid to encourage retailers and
food-service companies to purchase our products. Accruals for trade promotions
are recorded primarily at the time of sale of product to the customer based on
expected levels of performance. Settlement of the liabilities typically occurs
in subsequent periods primarily through an authorized process for deductions
taken by a customer from amounts otherwise due to us. As a result, the
ultimate cost of a trade promotion program is dependent on the relative success
of the events and the actions and level of deductions taken by our customers
for amounts they consider due to them. Final determination of the permissible
deductions may take extended periods of time.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated
statements of income, expressed as percentages of our total net sales, for the
periods indicated:
Net Sales
Despite the adverse consequences the general economic downturn has and
continues to have on consumer spending in the United States, we believe that
the fundamentals for our products continue to be favorable. Government census
studies continue to indicate a shift in the demographics of the U.S. population
in which larger portions of the population descend from a Hispanic origin.
Avocados are considered a staple item purchased by Hispanic consumers and their
acceptance as part of American cuisine continues to spur demand for our products.
We anticipate avocado products will further
penetrate the United States market place driven by growth in the Hispanic
community and general acceptance in American cuisine. As the largest marketer
of avocado products in the United States we believe that we are well positioned
to leverage this trend and to grow all segments of our business.
18
We recognize sales of perishable products when the product is shipped,
title and risk passes, and the market price is known. Service revenue,
including freight, ripening, and palletization charges, are recorded when
services are performed and/or the product is shipped. We generally recognize
sales from processed product sales directly to our customers upon shipment and
transfer of title and risk. We provide for sales returns and other allowances
at the time of shipment based on our experience. The following table summarizes
our net sales by business segment:
Net sales for the year ended October 31, 2002 when compared to 2001 grew
by approximately $25.0 million or 11.5%, principally as a result of growth
experienced by our California avocados and International avocados and
perishable food products businesses and offset by a decrease in our processed
products business. In particular, growth in our net sales reflects an
increasing percentage of our business being generated by our International
avocados and perishable food product business. We anticipate the continuation
of growth in this segment for fiscal 2003 with flat or slightly increasing
sales in our processed products business. We also anticipate continued growth
in net sales generated from value-added bagging and ripening services, as well
as the need to promote our products with additional sales incentives. The
following tables set forth sales by product category, freight and other charges
and sales incentives, by segment (dollars in thousands):
19
Net sales by segment include intercompany sales of avocados from our
Uruapan packinghouse to our Mexicali processing plant, as well as value-added
services billed by our Mexicali processing plan to our Santa Paula processing
plant in processing fresh avocados in avocado pulp. All intercompany sales are
eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
California Avocados
Net sales delivered by the business increased by approximately $15.9, or
10.7%, from fiscal 2001 to 2002. The increase in fiscal 2002 sales reflects a
significant improvement in the average selling prices of avocados when compared
to fiscal 2001, partially offset by a decrease in avocados delivered by our
growers of 5.8% or 9.2 million pounds. The decrease in delivered pounds is
consistent with the expected decrease in the overall harvest of the California
avocado crop for the 2001/2002 season. Despite this decrease in volume, we
have continued to build on our leadership role in packing and marketing
California grown avocados and have increased our market share of first grade
Hass variety avocados by approximately 1.5% to 37.2% in fiscal 2002 when
compared to a 35.7% market share achieved in fiscal 2001.
Average selling prices on a per carton basis for first grade Hass variety
avocados for fiscal 2002 were $3.88 higher when compared to fiscal 2001. We
attribute some of the increase in these average
selling prices to increasing demand for California grown avocados in the U.S.
marketplace and a slightly reduced volume of avocados. We believe that our
investments in focused marketing activities combined with promotional programs
established by the California Avocado Commission have generally had a positive
effect on average sales prices. Our strategy is to continue to develop
marketing opportunities that favorably position avocados packed by Calavo with
our customers by emphasizing existing value-added services such as fruit
bagging and ripening. We believe that these and other value added strategies
are critical elements in sustaining competitive average selling prices achieved
during fiscal 2002.
20
Net sales delivered by the business decreased by approximately $0.9
million, or 0.6%, from fiscal 2000 to 2001. The modest decrease in sales
reflects lower per pound prices offset by an increase in volume. During fiscal
2001, our growers delivered 39.2 million additional pounds of avocados when
compared to fiscal 2000, representing a volume increase of 32.9%. Although the
quality of the avocados sold remained comparable to those delivered during
fiscal 2000, the average size of the avocados delivered was one size smaller.
The significant increase in the volume of California grown avocados handled by
the industry, coupled with increasing deliveries of Mexican and Chilean grown
avocados, resulted in pricing pressures that caused average selling prices to
fall proportionately with the volume increase. Furthermore, effective November
1, 2001, the United States Department of Agriculture approved the distribution
of Mexican grown avocados into 12 new states which, in the short-term resulted
in continued pressure on average selling prices.
In October 2002, the USDA announced the creation of a National Avocado
Board to promote the sale of Hass variety avocados in the U.S. marketplace. The
California Avocado Commission, which receives its funding from the sale of
California grown avocados, has historically shouldered the promotional and
advertising costs supporting avocado sales. The new National Avocado Board now
provides a basis for a unified funding of promotional activities based on an
assessment on all avocados sold in the U.S. marketplace including imported and
California grown fruit. We believe that the incremental funding of promotional
and advertising programs in the U.S. will, in the long-term, positively impact
average selling prices and will favorably impact our California Avocado
business.
International and Perishable Food Products
For fiscal 2002 and 2001, net sales include approximately $5.3 million and
$3.8 million of intercompany sales between our Uruapan packinghouse and our
Mexicali processing plant, which are eliminated in our consolidated financial
results. For fiscal 2002, when compared to fiscal 2001, net sales to
third-party customers increased by approximately $10.6 million, or 24.5%, from
$43.2 million to $53.8 million.
The increased sales to third-parties by our International and Perishable
Foods Products business are primarily driven by a greater volume of Chilean and
Mexican grown avocados in the U.S. marketplace. The volume of fruit handled
increased by 2.4 million pounds of Chilean grown avocados, or 10.2%, and 22.6
million pounds of Mexican grown avocados, or 113.6%, for fiscal 2002 when
compared to fiscal 2001.
Our California based competitors and we have historically handled
marketing of Chilean grown avocados in the U.S. marketplace. During 2002, many
of the Chilean packers realigned the distribution of their avocados amongst
California based avocado handlers. The effect of this realignment has resulted
in uncertainties in the marketplace despite an overall increase in the Chilean
avocado crop. We believe that this uncertainty has resulted in adverse average
selling prices for Chilean grown avocados. Furthermore, the recent labor
disputes, which have affected the U.S. west-coast port operations in October of
2002, have limited the volume of Chilean avocado sales during this time frame.
We believe that in the long-run the realignment of receivers of Chilean
avocados and the labor disputes affecting west-coast port operations will not
adversely impact our net sales of Chilean grown avocados. However, there can
be no assurances that the realignment of receivers of Chilean avocados or the
labor disputes affecting west-coast port operations will not detrimentally
affect our operations.
During fiscal 2002, we sourced a significantly greater volume of Mexican
grown avocados from our Uruapan, Mexico packinghouse. Net sales during 2002
derived from shipments to the U.S. marketplace increased by approximately $7.1
million, or 103.4%, as compared to fiscal 2001. In addition, net sales
resulting from the sale of Mexican grown avocados were also favorably impacted
by increased demand from Japanese customers. During fiscal 2002, shipments to Japan
increased by approximately $0.4 million, or 9.8%, when compared to fiscal 2001.
We believe that sales from Mexican grown avocados will continue a growing
trend. We intend to leverage our position as the largest packer of Mexican
grown avocados for export markets to improve the overall performance of this
business.
21
For fiscal 2001 and 2000, net sales include approximately $3.8 million and
$4.0 million of intercompany sales between our Uruapan packinghouse and our
Mexicali processing plant, which are eliminated in our consolidated financial
results. For fiscal 2001, when compared to fiscal 2000, net sales to
third-party customers decreased by approximately $0.5 million, or 1.2%, from
$43.7 million to $43.2 million. Although net sales remained essentially flat,
the volume of avocados sold increased by 2.6 million pounds, or 6.2%. In
particular, the volume of Chilean grown avocados imported into the United
States increased by 5.9 million pounds offset by a slightly lower volume of
pounds imported from Mexico and New Zealand. The increased volume of avocados
arriving from Chile caused pricing pressures that resulted in decreases in
average selling prices.
Processed Products
Net sales for fiscal 2002 include approximately $6.2 million of
intercompany sales between our Mexicali and Santa Paula processing plants,
which are eliminated in our consolidated financial results. Net sales to
third-party customers decreased by approximately $2.5 million, or 9.5% from
$26.3 million for fiscal 2002 to $23.8 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease in
fiscal 2002 net sales to third-party customers is attributable to a decrease in
0.5 million pounds of product sold, or 3.7%, and an increase in sales
incentives and promotional activities paid of $1.2 million or 23.0%. We
continue to experience decreases in net sales to retail customers with a larger
percentage of our net sale originating from our food service customers. We
believe that the decrease in net sales to retail customers is attributable to
the introduction by our competitors of new products that have not been frozen.
Our strategy to reverse the decrease in net sales generated by our
processed business includes the introduction of new products. During fiscal
2002, we purchased and commissioned new ultra high pressure treatment equipment
designed to manufacture processed avocado products that are not frozen. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we successfully produced samples of this new
product group and recorded our first sale during the first fiscal quarter of
2003. We believe that the introduction of these fresh guacamole products will,
in the long-term, successfully address a growing market segment and reverse the
recent decline in our sales. However, there can be no assurances that we will
be successful in continuing to develop competitive products and penetrating a
marketplace that is currently dominated by an established competitor.
For fiscal 2001 and 2000, net sales include approximately $3.8 million and
$4.1 million of intercompany sales between our Mexicali and Santa Paula
processing plants, which are eliminated in our consolidated financial results.
The decrease in net sales reflects a decrease in the volume of processed
avocado product sold of 0.2 million pounds, or 1.2%, offset by a decrease in
promotional costs of $0.5 million or 8.1%. Increases in net sales to retail and
club stores only partially offset a decrease in net sales to our food service
customers.
Gross Margins
The following table summarizes our gross margins and gross profit
percentages by business segment:
22
realized by our California avocado and international
avocado and perishable food products segments, which were partially offset by
decreased gross profit percentages achieved by our processed products segment.
Gross margins decreased by approximately $0.7 million, or 3.8%, from fiscal
2000 to 2001, principally as a result of lower gross profit percentages
achieved by our processed products and international avocados and perishable
food products segments, which were offset by an increase in gross profit
percentages realized by our California avocado segment.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages for our California avocado
business are largely dependent on production yields achieved at our
packinghouses, current market prices of avocados, and the volume of avocados
packed. During fiscal 2002, our growers received an average return of $0.86 per
pound, as compared to $0.73 per pound in fiscal 2001, whereas the volume of
avocados delivered by our growers decreased by approximately 9.2 million
pounds. During fiscal 2001, our growers received an average return of $0.73 per
pound as compared to $1.06 per pound in fiscal 2000, whereas the volume of
avocados sold increased by approximately 39.2 million pounds. During fiscal
2002, freight and handling costs decreased by approximately $0.2 million, from
$3.0 million in fiscal 2001 to $2.8 million during fiscal 2002. Freight and
handling costs increased by approximately $1.2 million, from $1.8 million for
fiscal 2000 to $3.0 million for fiscal 2001 primarily as a result of a higher
volume of avocado deliveries to our customers. During both fiscal 2002 and
2001, we continued to review our packinghouse processes resulting in greater
packing efficiencies and more favorable production yields.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages for our processed product
business are largely dependent on the pricing of our final product and the cost
of avocados used in preparing guacamole. The cost of avocados used in the
preparation of our processed products decreased by 36.9% from fiscal 2001 to
2002, principally due to lower prices for avocados having the necessary quality
for preparing processed products. The cost of avocados used in the preparation
of our processed products increased by 40.4% from fiscal 2000 to 2001,
principally due to a lower volume of Mexican avocados available for processing.
The lower volume of Mexican avocados available for processing caused us to
purchase higher-priced avocados grown in California to meet the segments
volume sales requirements.
The gross margin and gross profit percentage for our international avocado
and perishable food products business are dependent on the volume of fruit we
handle and the competitiveness of the returns that we provide to third party
domestic packers. For example, the gross margins we earn on avocados procured
from Chile and New Zealand, as well as papayas grown in Hawaii, are generally
based on a commission agreed to with each packer that is subject to incentive
provisions. These provisions provide for us to deliver returns to these
domestic packers that are competitive with those delivered by other handlers.
Accordingly, the gross margin results for this business are a function of the
volume handled and the competitiveness of the sales prices that we realize as
compared to others. For fiscal 2002, we generated gross margins of $1.4 million
from the sale of fresh produce products that were domestically packed by third
parties, whereas gross margins for fiscal 2001 were only $1.2 million. The
gross margins of $1.2 million for fiscal 2001 were down $0.4 million from
fiscal 2000 principally as a result of unfavorable returns. Our business with
Mexican growers differs in that we operate a packinghouse in Mexico and
purchase avocados directly from the field. Consequently, the gross margin and
gross profit percentages generated by our Mexican operations are significantly
impacted by the volume of avocados handled by our packinghouse. During fiscal
2002, our gross margins generated from the sale of Mexican avocados improved
from a negative margin of approximately $0.7 million in fiscal 2001 to a
positive margin of $1.8 million in fiscal 2002 principally as a result of
increases in the pounds packed at our facility. During fiscal 2001, our gross
margins decreased from approximately $1.1 million in fiscal 2000 to a negative
margin of approximately $0.7 million in fiscal 2001 attributable to a decrease in
pounds packed at our facility.
Selling, General and Administrative
23
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million from
fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001. The increase is attributable to a $0.3 million
increase in corporate expenses related to the process of converting to a
for-profit corporation and offset by other net decreases of
$0.1 million.
Other Expense (Income), Net
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
24
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results for each of the eight
fiscal quarters in the period ended October 31, 2002. The information for each
of these quarters is derived from our unaudited interim financial statements
and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report. In our opinion, all necessary
adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring accruals, have been
included to fairly present our unaudited quarterly results.
The quarterly results for fiscal 2001 reflect a revision of previously
reported amounts. This revision was made to correct misreporting of certain
expenses among quarters within fiscal 2001, primarily occurring prior to our
conversion from a non-profit agricultural cooperative to a for-profit public
company. In addition, reclassifications have been made to the 2001
financial data to classify certain costs and expenses consistent with
the 2002 presentation. Net sales, gross margin, selling, general and
administrative expenses, net income and net income
per share as previously reported for each of the quarters in the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2001 were as follows (in thousands except per
share amounts):
25
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities for fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000 provided cash flows of
$8.1 million, $1.2 million, and $3.0 million. Fiscal 2002 operating cash flows
reflect our net income of $6.9 million, net noncash charges (depreciation and
amortization, provision for losses on accounts receivable and a loss on the
disposal of equipment) of $2.0 million and a net increase in the non-cash
components of our working capital of approximately $0.8 million.
The fiscal 2002 working capital increases include an increase in
inventories of $3.4 million, principally due to a build-up of processed
inventories using favorable priced avocado pulp, an increase in prepaid
expenses and other assets of $2.0 million, principally due to advances and a
deposit on the purchase of equipment, an increase in deferred income taxes of
$0.6 million, a decrease in amounts payable to growers of $0.5 million, other
miscellaneous net increases of $0.2 million, and offset by an increase in
accounts payable and accrued expenses of $3.3 million, a decrease in account
receivable of $1.9 million principally and a decrease in loans to growers of
$0.7 million.
Cash used in investing activities was $2.1 million, $2.0 million, and $1.7
million for fiscal years 2002, 2001, and 2000. Fiscal 2002 cash flows used in
investing activities include capital expenditures of $2.0 million and purchases
of investments of $0.1 million, principally acquired to be used in the sinking
fund to retire our long-term debt.
Cash flows from financing activities were $1.4 million for fiscal 2001
compared to cash used by financing activities of $7.2 million and $1.2 million
for fiscal years 2002 and 2000. Cash flows from financing activities used
during fiscal 2002 include repayments of borrowings of $13.3 million and $6.1
million of proceeds from issuance of common stock and repayments of notes from
shareholders.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash reserves, cash
generated from operations and amounts available for borrowing under our
existing credit facilities. Cash and cash equivalents as of October 31, 2002
and 2001, totaled $0.9 million and $2.1 million. Our working capital at October
31, 2002 was $18.8 million compared to $9.8 million at October 31, 2001. The
overall working capital increase reflects our repayment of short-term
borrowings and the build-up of inventories in our processed products business.
We believe that cash flows from operations and available credit facilities
will be sufficient to satisfy our future capital expenditures, grower
recruitment efforts, working capital and other financing requirements. Our
largest line of credit which has a borrowing capacity of $23,500,000 was
renewed on February 27, 2002 for a two year period. We will continue to
evaluate grower recruitment opportunities and exclusivity arrangements with
food service companies to fuel growth in each of our business segments. In
order to finance such growth we may seek to obtain additional borrowings or
issue shares of our common stock
As of October 31, 2002, we have entered into a commitment to purchase a
new piece of equipment for our processed products segment for a total of $2.0
million.
The following table summarizes contractual obligations pursuant to which
we are required to make cash payments. The information is presented as of our
fiscal year ended October 31, 2002:
26
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143).
SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. SFAS 143 applies to legal obligations associated with
the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition,
construction, development and normal use of the asset. SFAS 143 applies to all
entities and amends FASB Statement No. 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting
by Oil and Gas Producing Companies. SFAS 143 requires that the fair value of a
liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in
which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. SFAS
143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We believe
that SFAS 143 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). While SFAS 144
supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, it retains many of the
fundamental provisions of that Statement. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We believe that adoption of SFAS 144 in fiscal 2003 will not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, Rescission of FASB
Statement Nos. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections (SFAS 145). SFAS 145 rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, Reporting
Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt (SFAS 4) and amends other
existing authoritative pronouncements. As a result of SFAS 145, gains and
losses from extinguishment of debt should be classified as extraordinary items
only if they meet the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30,
Reporting the Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a
Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions (APB 30). Applying the provisions of APB 30 will
distinguish transactions that are part of an entitys recurring operations from
those that are unusual or infrequent or that meet the criteria for
classification as an extraordinary item. We are currently analyzing SFAS 145;
however based on managements current understanding and interpretation, SFAS
145 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146. SFAS 146 replaces
EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred
in a Restructuring). SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated
with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date
of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 is to be applied
prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
We believe that adoption of SFAS 146 will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 148 (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. This
statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to
the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirement of
Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim
financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS 148
is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2002. We have not determined whether we will adopt the fair value
based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.
27
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, short and long-term loans to growers, notes receivable from
shareholders, United States government bonds with a maturity date of August 15,
2005, accounts payable, current borrowings pursuant to our credit facilities
with financial institutions and long-term, fixed-rate obligations. All of our
financial instruments are entered into during the normal course of operations
and have not been acquired for trading purposes. The table below summarizes
interest rate sensitive financial instruments and presents principal cash flows
in U.S. dollars, which is our reporting currency, and weighted-average interest
rates by expected maturity dates, as of October 31, 2002.
We were not a party to any derivative instruments during the fiscal year.
It is currently our intent not to use derivative instruments for speculative or
trading purposes. Consequently, we do not use any hedging or forward contracts
to offset market volatility.
Our Mexican-based operations transact business in Mexican pesos. Funds are
transferred by our corporate office to Mexico on a weekly basis to satisfy
domestic cash needs. Consequently, the spot rate for the Mexican peso has a
moderate impact on our operating results. However, we do not believe that this
impact is sufficient to warrant the use of derivative instruments to hedge the
fluctuation in the Mexican peso. Total foreign currency gains and losses for
each of the three years ended October 31, 2002 do not exceed $0.1 million.
28
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
29
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
31
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
32
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of the business
Business
Calavo Growers, Inc. (Calavo, the Company, we, us or our) procures and
markets avocados and other perishable foods and prepares and distributes
processed avocado products. Our expertise in marketing and distributing
avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods allows us to deliver a
wide array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors, produce
wholesalers, supermarkets, and restaurants on a world-wide basis. Through our
four operating facilities in southern California and two facilities in Mexico,
we sort and pack avocados procured in California and Mexico and prepare
processed avocado products. Additionally, we procure avocados internationally,
principally from Chile and New Zealand, and distribute other perishable foods
such as Hawaiian grown papayas. We report these operations in three different
business segments: California avocados, processed products, and international
avocados and perishable food products.
Conversion to a For-Profit Corporation
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common
and preferred shareholders of Calavo Growers of California, an agricultural
marketing cooperative association, exchanged all of their outstanding shares
for shares of our common stock. Concurrent with this transaction, the
Cooperative was merged into us, with our company emerging as the surviving
entity. These transactions had the effect of converting the legal structure of
the business from a not-for-profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation.
Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements give
retroactive effect, for all periods presented, to the merger, as a combination
of entities with common shareholders, accounted for in a manner similar to a
pooling of interests.
The cooperatives historical statement of operations and member proceeds,
previously prepared on a basis consistent with practices applicable to other
marketing cooperatives, had been revised to reflect our new legal structure as
a commercial corporation. Accordingly, the accompanying income statement for
fiscal 2000 reflects the reclassification of proceeds distributed to growers
and other related accounts maintained by the cooperative to cost of goods sold,
consistent with the operations of a commercial corporation.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Calavo
Growers, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries, Calavo Foods, Inc.; Calavo de
Mexico S.A. de C.V.; and Calavo Foods de Mexico S.A. de C.V. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an
original maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost on a weighted-average basis or
market.
33
Loans to Growers
We sponsor a grower loan program. Pursuant to this program, we provide
loans to growers, bearing interest at prevailing market rates and repayable
generally within a 12-month period. These loans are secured by the growers
avocado crops.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over
their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Leasehold
improvements are stated at cost and amortized over the lesser of their
estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, using the straight-line
method. The principal estimated useful lives are: buildings and
improvements 7 to 30 years; leasehold improvements 7 years; equipment 7 years;
information systems hardware and software 36 to 60 months.
We capitalize software development costs for internal use in accordance
with Statement of Position 98-1,
Accounting for Costs of Computer Software
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use
(SOP 98-1). Capitalization of software
development costs begins in the application development stage and ends when the
asset is placed into service. We amortize such costs using the straight-line
basis over estimated useful lives. Under SOP 98-1, we capitalized $108,000 and
$969,000 of software development costs in 2002 and 2001 relating to systems
supporting our business infrastructure.
Long-lived Assets
We account for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121,
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be
Disposed Of.
In accordance with SFAS No. 121, long-lived assets to be held for
use are reviewed periodically for events or changes in circumstances which
indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. We have evaluated
our long-lived assets, using estimates of undiscounted future cash flows, and
have not identified any impairment as of October 31, 2002.
Investments
We account for our investments in debt securities in accordance with SFAS
No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
. We
have classified our entire investment portfolio as held-to-maturity. In
accordance with SFAS No. 115, investments classified as held-to-maturity are
carried at amortized cost.
Net Sales
We recognize sales once they are realizable and earned. Sales of products
and related costs of products sold are recognized when persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is fixed
or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Perishable product
sales are recorded when the product is shipped, title passes, and the market
price is known. Sales from processed products are recorded when the product is
shipped and title and risk passes. Service revenue, including freight,
ripening, storage, bagging and palletization charges, are recorded when
services are performed and sales of the related product are recognized.
Promotional Allowances
We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on our
historical experience.
Cash rebates are generally earned by our customers upon achievement of
volume purchases or by corporate customers for purchases made by their
affiliated subsidiaries.
Sales incentives offered voluntarily by us, without charge to a customer,
in a single exchange transaction at the point of sale are accounted for in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-14,
Accounting
for Certain Sales Incentives
. Accordingly, all sales incentives that result in
a reduction in, or refund of the selling price at the time of sale, have been
classified as reduction of sales.
34
All other cash consideration paid by us to a reseller or distributor of
our products is accounted for in accordance with EITF No. 00-25,
Vendor Income
Statement Characterization of Consideration Paid to a Reseller of the Vendors
Product.
This guidance provides that consideration paid by us to a reseller of
our products is presumed to be a reduction of our selling price except when (a)
the vendor receives an identifiable benefit that is sufficiently separable from
the recipients purchase of our products, and (b) we can reasonably identify
the fair value of the benefit.
We believe that we can reasonably estimate allowances for promotional
allowances based on our historical experience in providing these sales
incentives. Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the average length
of time between the product shipment date and the date on which we pay the
customer the promotional allowance. The product of this lag factor and our
historical promotional allowance payment rate is the basis for the promotional
allowance recorded on our balance sheet.
As a result of the adoption of EITF 00-14 and EITF 00-25 on November 1,
2000 (codified by EITF 01-9), prior year balances have been reclassified to
conform to our current year presentation. EITF 00-14 and EITF 00-25 required
certain costs related to performance based promotional allowance previously
recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses to be reclassified and
presented as a reduction of sales. The combined effect of EITF 00-14 and EITF
00-25 was a reduction of approximately $2.5 million in both net sales and
selling, general and administrative expenses, for the previously reported year
ended October 31, 2000.
Consignment Arrangements
We enter into consignment arrangements with avocado growers and packers
located outside of the United States and growers of certain perishable products
in the United States. Although we generally do not take legal title to avocados
and perishable products, we do assume responsibilities (principally assuming
credit risk, inventory loss and delivery risk, and limited pricing risk) that
are consistent with acting as a principal in the transaction. Accordingly, the
accompanying financial statements include sales and cost of sales from the sale
of avocados and perishable products procured under consignment arrangements.
Amounts recorded for each of the fiscal years ended October 31, 2002, 2001 and
2000 in the financial statements pursuant to consignment arrangements are as
follows (in thousands):
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Such costs in fiscal 2002,
2001, and 2000 were approximately $245,000, $326,000, and $318,000.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates are used principally in
determining valuation allowances related to accounts receivable and inventory.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
. This statement requires the recognition of
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future consequences of events that
have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns.
Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event
the future consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and
tax bases of our assets and liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS
No. 109 requires an evaluation of the probability of being able to realize the
future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation
35
allowance related to a
deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share
We present basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share in
accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share
. Basic net income per share
is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the period without consideration of the dilutive effect of stock
options. The basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding was
11,562,000, 10,454,000, and 10,335,000 for fiscal years 2002, 2001, and 2000.
Diluted net income per common share is calculated using the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period after consideration of
the dilutive effect of stock options. The dilutive weighted-average number of
common shares and equivalents outstanding was 11,604,000, 10,454,000, and
10,335,000 for fiscal years 2002, 2001, and 2000
Foreign Currency Translation and Remeasurement
Our foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and
foreign currency transaction costs. The functional currency of our foreign
subsidiaries is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates as of the balance sheet date and
non-monetary assets, liabilities and equity are translated at historical rates.
Sales and expenses are translated using a weighted-average exchange rate for
the period. Gains and losses resulting from those remeasurements are included
in income. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are
also recognized currently in income.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, current borrowings pursuant to credit
facilities and industrial revenue and development bond approximate fair value
due to the short maturity of these financial instruments. The following table
illustrates long-term financial instruments, their fair value and the carrying
value of these instruments on our balance sheet as of October 31, 2002:
Derivative Financial Instruments
We do not presently engage in hedging activities. In addition, we have
reviewed agreements and contracts and have determined that we have no
derivative instruments, nor do any of our agreements and contracts contain
embedded derivative instruments as of October 31, 2002. Accordingly, the
adoption of SFAS No. 133
, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,
as amended by SFAS No. 137,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
133,
and SFAS No. 138,
Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and
Certain Hedging Activities,
on November 1, 2001, did not have an impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143).
SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. SFAS 143 applies to legal obligations associated with
the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition,
construction, development and normal use of the asset. SFAS 143 applies to all
entities and amends FASB Statement No. 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting
by Oil and Gas Producing Companies. SFAS 143 requires that the fair value of a
liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in
which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.
36
SFAS
143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We believe
that SFAS 143 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). While SFAS 144
supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, it retains many of the
fundamental provisions of that Statement. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We believe that adoption of SFAS 144 in fiscal 2003 will not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, Rescission of FASB
Statement Nos. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections (SFAS 145). SFAS 145 rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, Reporting
Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt (SFAS 4) and amends other
existing authoritative pronouncements. As a result of SFAS 145, gains and
losses from extinguishment of debt should be classified as extraordinary items
only if they meet the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30,
Reporting the Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a
Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions (APB 30). Applying the provisions of APB 30 will
distinguish transactions that are part of an entitys recurring operations from
those that are unusual or infrequent or that meet the criteria for
classification as an extraordinary item. We are currently analyzing SFAS 145;
however based on managements current understanding and interpretation, SFAS
145 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146). SFAS 146 replaces
EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred
in a Restructuring). SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated
with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date
of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 is to be applied
prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
We believe that adoption of SFAS 146 will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 148 (SFAS No. 148),
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. This
statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to
the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirement of
Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim
financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS 148
is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. We have not
determined whether we will adopt the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as all changes in a companys net assets,
except changes resulting from transactions with shareholders. There was no
difference between comprehensive income and net income for the fiscal years
ended October 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the prior period financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
37
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
Cost of goods sold for fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000 includes inventory
write-downs of $63,000, $35,000 and $0. These write-downs resulted from reduced
customer demand for processed avocado products.
We assess the recoverability of inventories through an on-going review of
inventory levels in relation to sales and forecasts, and product marketing
plans. When the inventory on hand exceeds the foreseeable demand, the value of
inventory that at the time of the review is not expected to be sold is written
down. The amount of the write-down is the excess of historical cost over
estimated realizable value (generally zero). Once established, these
write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the
excess inventory.
The assessment of the recoverability of inventories, and the amounts of
any write-downs, is based on currently available information and assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. Demand for processed avocado
products may fluctuate significantly over time, and actual demand and market
conditions may be more or less favorable than our projections. In the event
that actual demand is lower than originally projected, additional inventory
write-downs may be required.
We may retain and make available for sale some or all of the inventories
which have been written down. In the event that actual demand is higher than
originally projected, we may be able to sell a portion of these inventories in
the future. We generally scrap inventories which have been written-down and are
identified as obsolete.
4. Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
38
5. Investments Held-to-Maturity
We have invested funds in United States government bonds yielding interest
at 5.67% maturing on August 15, 2005. The interest income generated from the
bonds is reinvested in a money market fund. The investments are held in an
irrevocable trust to be used solely for the satisfaction of scheduled payments
of interest and principal relating to the Industrial Development Revenue Bonds.
The cost and fair value of investments held-to-maturity ends consist of the
following (in thousands):
6. Other Assets
During 1999, we established a Grower Development Program whereby funds
could be advanced to growers in exchange for their commitment to deliver a
minimum volume of avocados on an annual basis. Through October 31, 2002, total
cumulative advances made to growers subject to this program totaled
approximately $2,000,000. Each advance made is amortized to cost of goods sold
over the term of the agreement. The financial statements for fiscal years 2002
and 2001 include a charge of approximately $293,000 for each year representing
the amortization of these advances.
7. Short-Term Borrowings
We maintain short-term, noncollateralized, borrowing agreements with
various banks, payable in variable annual installments through November 2005.
Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced funds for working capital
purposes. Total credit available under the combined short-term borrowing
agreements was $26,500,000 at October 31, 2002 and 2001, with interest at a
weighted-average rate of 2.84% and 3.18% at October 31, 2002 and 2001. We had
outstanding borrowings of $3,000,000 and $15,800,000 as of October 31, 2002 and
2001, under these agreements. The short-term borrowing agreements contain
debt-to-equity financial covenants with which we were in compliance at October
31, 2002 and 2001.
8. Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligations at fiscal year ends consist of the following (in
thousands):
The revolving term loans contain debt-to-equity financial covenants with
which we were in compliance at October 31, 2002 and 2001.
The Riverside County Variable Rate Demand Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds (the Bonds) are collateralized by property and equipment with a net book
value of approximately $1,468,000 at October 31, 2002. The lending agreement
contains certain financial covenants with which we were in compliance at
October 31, 2002 and 2001. As required by the Bonds lending agreement, we
posted a $2,800,000 standby letter of credit from a bank, which matures on
September 15, 2003.
39
At October 31, 2002, annual debt payments are scheduled as follows (in
thousands):
9. Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor a defined contribution retirement plan for salaried employees
and make contributions to a pension plan for hourly employees. Expenses of the
plans approximated $402,000, $399,000, and $362,000 for each of the three years
in the period ended October 31, 2002, which are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the accompanying financial statements.
We also sponsor a non-qualified defined benefit plan for two retired
executives. Pension expenses approximated $29,000, $29,000, and $27,000 for the
years ended October 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, which are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying financial statements.
Components of the change in projected benefit obligation for fiscal year
ends consist of the following (in thousands):
The following is a reconciliation of the unfunded status of the plans at
fiscal year ends included in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses (in
thousands):
Significant assumptions used in the determination of pension expense
consist of the following:
40
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
We lease facilities and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating
leases expiring at various dates through 2007. We are committed to make minimum
cash payments under these agreements as of October 31, 2002 as follows (amounts
in thousands):
Rental expenses amounted to approximately $1,296,000, $1,223,000, and
$1,155,000 for the years ended October 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000.
Litigation
We are involved in litigation in the ordinary course of business, none of
which we believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial
statements.
11. Related-Party Transactions
We sell papayas purchased from an entity owned by the Chairman of our
Board of Directors. Sales of papayas amounted to approximately $2,658,000,
$3,378,000, and $2,062,000 for the years ended October 31, 2002, 2001, and
2000, resulting in gross margins of approximately $272,000, $340,000 and
$198,000. Included in trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities are
approximately $119,000, $317,000, and $235,000 at October 31, 2002, 2001, and
2000, due to this entity.
12. Income Taxes
The income tax provision consists of the following for the years ended
October 31 (in thousands):
41
At October 31, 2002 and 2001, gross deferred tax assets totaled
approximately $1,489,000 and $776,000, while gross deferred tax liabilities
totaled approximately $753,000 and $606,000. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities consist of the tax effects of temporary differences related to the
following at October 31 (in thousands):
Prior to our conversion to a for-profit corporation, the Cooperative was
subject to income taxes on all business activities other than the marketing and
distribution of member products. The exemption from taxation for the member
business was contingent on the distribution of all available proceeds to the
Cooperatives members. Absent the distribution of all proceeds, the Cooperative
was subject to income taxes for the portion of proceeds available that exceeded
the actual amounts distributed. Amounts paid by the Cooperative to the Internal
Revenue Service and state tax authorities for each of the years for which the
tax provision was restated were not affected and did not require revision.
A reconciliation of the significant differences between the federal
statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate on pretax income is
as follows:
42
13. Segments Information
We operate and track results in three reportable segments California
avocados, international avocados and perishable foods products, and processed
products. These three business segments are presented based on our management
structure and information used by the president to measure performance and
allocate resources. The California avocados segment includes all operations
that involve the distribution of avocados procured in California. The
international avocados and perishable foods products segment includes both
operations related to distribution of fresh avocados procured from Mexico,
Chile and New Zealand and distribution of other perishable food items. The
processed products segment represents all operations related to the purchase,
manufacturing, and distribution of processed avocado products. Those costs that
can be specifically identified with a particular product line are charged
directly to that product line. Costs that are not segment specific are
generally allocated based on five-year average sales dollars. We do not
allocate assets or specifically identify them to our operating segments.
43
The following table sets forth sales by product category, by segment (in
thousands):
44
\
Long-lived assets attributed to geographic areas as of October 31 are as
follows (in thousands):
14. Restatement
Subsequent to the issuance of our financial statements for the year ended
October 31, 2000, we determined that errors had been made in computing the
income tax provision and related income tax liability and receivable accounts
during each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2000. As a
result, the financial statements as of and for the year ended October 31, 2000
have been restated from the amounts previously reported. Amounts paid by the
Cooperative to the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities for each
of the years for which the tax provision was restated were not affected and did
not require revision.
A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:
45
15. Stock-Based Compensation
On November 20, 2001, our Board of Directors approved two new stock-based
compensation plans.
The Directors Stock Option Plan
Participation in the directors stock option plan is limited to members of
our Board of Directors. The plan makes available to the Board of Directors or a
plan administrator the right to grant options to purchase up to 3,000,000
shares of common stock. In connection with the adoption of the plan, the Board
of Directors approved an award of fully vested options to purchase 1,240,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share.
Prior to the listing of our common stock on a national market, the plan
stipulated that the fair value of common stock be determined by our Board of
Directors based on current trading patterns in the common stock and other
analyses of fair value. Based on a review of such data, our Board of Directors
determined that the fair value of the common stock subject to the above awards
at the date of grant was $3.95 per share.
On January 31, 2002, members of our Board of Directors elected to exercise
options to purchase approximately 1,005,000 shares of common stock. The
exercise price was paid by delivery of full-recourse promissory notes with a
face value of $4,789,000 and by cash payments of approximately $236,000. These
notes and the related security agreements provide, among other things, that
each director pledge as collateral the shares acquired upon exercise of the
stock option, as well as additional shares of common stock held by the
directors with a value equal to 10% of the loan amount, if the exercise price
was paid by means of a full-recourse note. The notes, which bear interest at 7%
per annum, provide for annual interest payments with a final principal payment
due March 1, 2007. Directors will be allowed to withdraw shares from the
pledged pool of common stock prior to repayment of their notes, as long as the
fair value of the remaining pledged shares is at least equal to 120% of the
outstanding note balance. The notes have been presented as a reduction of
shareholders equity as of October 31, 2002.
From January 31, 2002 through October 31, 2002, directors have made
principal payments of $250,000 related to these notes and we have accrued
interest income of $245,000. As of October 31, 2002, we have recorded interest
receivable of $245,000 which is included in prepaid expenses and other current
assets.
A summary of stock option activity follows (shares in thousands):
The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable
at October 31, 2002 (shares in thousands):
As permitted under SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,
we have elected to follow Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related interpretations, in
accounting for stock-based awards to employees. Under APB No. 25, we generally
recognize no compensation expense with respect to awards granted with exercise
prices equal to or greater than the fair value of our common stock.
46
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is
required to be presented in accordance with SFAS No. 123. This information
presents financial results as if we had accounted for stock-based awards to our
directors under the fair value method of that Statement. Had compensation cost
for stock option awards been determined based on the fair value at the grant
date for awards, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, our net income
and net income per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
For purposes of pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, the estimated
fair value of the options is assumed to be amortized to compensation expense
over the options vesting period. The fair value of the options granted has
been estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following assumptions:
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility. Because options held by our directors have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in
the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
in our opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of these options.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The employee stock purchase plan was approved by our Board of Directors
and shareholders. Participation in the employee stock purchase plan is limited
to employees. The plan provides the Board of Directors, or a plan
administrator, the right to make available up to 2,000,000 shares of common
stock at a price not less than fair market value. On March 28, 2002 the Board
of Directors awarded selected employees the opportunity to purchase up to
474,000 shares of common stock at $7.00 per share, the closing price of our
common stock on the date prior to the grant. The plan also permits us to
advance all or some of the purchase price of the purchased stock to the
employee upon the execution of a full-recourse note at prevailing interest
rates. Accordingly, these awards expired on April 26, 2002, with 84
participating employees electing to purchase approximately 279,000 shares.
The purchase price was paid by delivery of full-recourse promissory notes
with a face value of $1,352,000 and by cash payments of approximately $600,000.
These notes and the related security agreements provide, among other things,
that each employee pledge as collateral the shares acquired. The notes, which
bear interest at 7% per annum, provide for annual interest and principal
payments for a period of two to four years. The notes have been presented as a
reduction of shareholders equity as of October 31, 2002.
From January 31, 2002 through October 31, 2002, employees have made
principal and interest payments of $171,000 and $3,000 related to these notes
and we have accrued interest income of $52,000. As of October 31, 2002, we have
recorded interest receivable of $49,000 which is included in prepaid expenses
and other current assets.
47
16. Stock and Cash Dividends
On February 15, 2002, we issued a 5% stock dividend to all shareholders of
record as of February 1, 2002. Basic and diluted earnings per share for all
periods presented have been restated to reflect the 5% stock dividend effected
on February 15, 2002 for shareholders of record as of February 1, 2002.
On October 24, 2002, we announced the establishment of a new cash dividend
policy whereby we would make annual cash dividend payments of 20 cents per
share payable during the first quarter of each fiscal year. Pursuant to this
new policy our Board of Directors authorized a dividend payment of $2,567,000
on January 3, 2002 to shareholders of record as of November 15, 2002.
17. Subsequent Events
From October 31, 2002 through January 20, 2003, directors made additional
interest and principal payments on outstanding promissory notes of
approximately $88,000 and $540,000. In addition, we received proceeds of
approximately $475,000 from the exercise of stock options.
48
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Calavo
Growers, Inc. (the Company) and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2002.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Calavo Growers, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of October 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
October 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on
October 9, 2001, the Company consummated a merger with Calavo Growers of
California. The consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect, for
all periods presented, to the merger as a combination of entities with common
shareholders, and has been accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of
interests.
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ending
October 31, 2000 have been restated.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
49
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Report in
that we will file a definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on March 17, 2003 pursuant to Regulation 14A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Proxy Statement) not later than 120 days
after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, and certain
information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference
to the sections entitled Executive Compensation and Directors Compensation
in the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the sections entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
We sell papayas purchased from an entity owned by the Chairman of our
Board of Directors. Sales of papayas amounted to approximately $2,658,000,
$3,378,000, and $2,062,000 for the years ended October 31, 2002, 2001, and
2000, resulting in gross profits of approximately $272,000, $340,000 and
$198,000. Included in trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities are
approximately $119,000, $317,000, and $235,000 at October 31, 2002, 2001, and
2000, due to this entity.
Additional information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the
Proxy Statement.
50
High
Low
$
12.00
$
6.00
$
8.60
$
7.00
$
8.40
$
6.85
Fiscal Year Ended October 31,
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
(Restated)
(Restated)
(Restated)
(In thousands, except per share data)
$
242,671
$
217,704
$
220,712
$
177,853
$
148,522
25,823
18,808
19,554
14,302
16,256
11,942
6,240
7,188
739
3,922
5,727
2,744
2,430
229
1,195
6,915
3,838
4,476
244
1,184
$
0.60
$
0.37
$
0.43
$
0.02
$
0.12
18,833
9,799
12,559
8,824
11,052
55,132
52,368
46,537
43,295
33,512
3,222
16,241
9,486
9,148
475
3,180
3,429
3,820
4,331
4,794
30,556
20,029
21,066
16,477
17,055
8,135
1,161
2,958
(6,624
)(3)
1,464
(2,078
)
(2,029
)
(1,685
)
(1,171
)
(3,284
)(4)
(7,193
)
1,433
(1,239
)
6,920
(3)
167
$
0.20
$
0.50
(2)
$
$
0.12
$
0.17
$
2.38
$
2.01
$
2.13
$
1.67
$
1.77
$
12,998
$
7,373
$
7,690
$
866
$
2,681
1,957
1,988
1,748
1,750
1,456
$
14,955
$
9,361
$
9,438
$
2,616
$
4,137
149,217
158,449
119,247
82,227
91,698
69,512
44,935
42,300
32,630
20,957
14,248
14,788
14,962
9,815
11,644
(1)
As a result of the adoption of EITF 00-14 and EITF 00-25 on November 1,
2000 (codified by EITF 01-9), prior year balances have been reclassified
to conform to current year presentation. EITF 00-14 and EITF 00-25
required certain costs related to performance based promotional allowance
previously recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses to be
reclassified and presented as a reduction of sales. The combined effect
of EITF 00-14 and EITF 00-25 was a reduction of approximately $5.9
million, $4.2 million, and $3.6 million, in both net sales and selling,
general and administrative expenses, for the previously reported years
ended October 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
(2)
Dividends per share for fiscal 2001 represent the payment of our dividend
to shareholders for the results of our fiscal 2000 operations. We did not
declare a cash dividend in connection with our fiscal 2001 operating
results. In December 2001, we declared a 5% stock dividend payable
February 15, 2002 for all shareholders of record as of February 1, 2002.
Basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented have been
restated to reflect the 5% stock dividend. Dividends per share and net
book value per share are computed based on the actual shares outstanding.
(3)
Cash flows used in operations for fiscal 1999 include the effect of
higher accounts receivable balances as of October 31, 1999 when compared
to October 31, 1998. The increase in accounts receivable during the year
is a result principally of higher California and imported avocado sales.
Cash flows from financing activities for fiscal 1999 relate principally to
amounts borrowed under short-term borrowing agreements to finance our
increased operating cash flow needs and fund our fiscal 1998 investing
activities.
(4)
Cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal 1998 reflect amounts
expended in purchasing our corporate headquarters building and capital
expenditures made to complete construction of our Mexican packinghouse.
(5)
EBIT represents income before income taxes plus interest expense of
approximately $0.3 million, $0.4 million, $0.8 million, $0.8 million and
$0.4 million, respectively, for each of the five years in the period ended
October 31, 2002.
(6)
EBITDA is a measure of liquidity used by Calavo and members of the
financial community to assess the cash flow generating capabilities of our
on-going operations and our ability to service debt.
Year ended October 31,
2002
2001
2000
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
10.6
%
8.6
%
8.9
%
5.7
%
5.8
%
5.6
%
4.9
%
2.9
%
3.3
%
(0.3
)%
(0.2
)%
0.1
%
2.8
%
1.8
%
2.0
%
2002
Change
2001
Change
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
$
165,077
10.7
%
$
149,158
(0.6
)%
$
150,016
59,083
25.6
%
47,048
(1.5
)%
47,767
29,960
(0.5
)%
30,107
(3.2
)%
31,104
(11,449
)
(8,609
)
(8,175
)
$
242,671
11.5
%
$
217,704
(1.4
)%
$
220,712
68.0
%
68.1
%
68.0
%
22.2
%
19.9
%
19.8
%
9.8
%
12.0
%
12.2
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Year ended October 31, 2002
Year ended October 31, 2001
International
International
Avocados and
Avocados and
Perishable
Perishable
California
Food
Processed
California
Food
Processed
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
$
153,878
$
$
$
153,878
$
137,166
$
$
$
137,166
43,715
43,715
34,566
34,566
2,658
2,658
3,378
3,378
42
42
41
41
24,964
24,964
25,912
25,912
5,141
5,141
5,625
5,625
153,878
46,415
30,105
230,398
137,166
37,985
31,537
206,688
11,381
7,540
217
19,138
11,304
5,256
59
16,619
165,259
53,955
30,322
249,536
148,470
43,241
31,596
223,307
(182
)
(150
)
(6,533
)
(6,865
)
(276
)
(14
)
(5,313
)
(5,603
)
165,077
53,805
23,789
242,671
148,194
43,227
26,283
217,704
5,278
6,171
11,449
964
3,821
3,824
8,609
$
165,077
$
59,083
$
29,960
254,120
$
149,158
$
47,048
$
30,107
226,313
(11,449
)
(8,609
)
$
242,671
$
217,704
Year ended October 31, 2001
Year ended October 31, 2000
International
International
Avocados and
Avocados and
Perishable
Perishable
California
Food
Processed
California
Food
Processed
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
$
137,166
$
$
$
137,166
$
142,774
$
$
$
142,774
34,566
34,566
38,361
38,361
3,378
3,378
2,061
2,061
41
41
25,912
25,912
27,225
27,225
5,625
5,625
5,518
5,518
137,166
37,985
31,537
206,688
142,774
40,422
32,743
215,939
11,304
5,256
59
16,619
7,438
3,332
10,770
148,470
43,241
31,596
223,307
150,212
43,754
32,743
226,709
(276
)
(14
)
(5,313
)
(5,603
)
(209
)
(8
)
(5,780
)
(5,997
)
148,194
43,227
26,283
217,704
150,003
43,746
26,963
220,712
964
3,821
3,824
8,609
13
4,021
4,141
8,175
$
149,158
$
47,048
$
30,107
226,313
$
150,016
$
47,767
$
31,104
228,887
(8,609
)
(8,175
)
$
217,704
$
220,712
2002
Change
2001
Change
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
$
17,281
44.9
%
$
11,926
65.0
%
$
7,230
3,711
404.2
%
736
(74.6
)%
2,895
4,831
(21.4
)%
6,146
(34.8
)%
9,429
$
25,823
37.3
%
$
18,808
(3.8
)%
$
19,554
10.5
%
8.0
%
4.8
%
6.9
%
1.7
%
6.6
%
20.3
%
23.4
%
35.0
%
10.6
%
8.6
%
8.9
%
Our cost of goods
sold consists predominantly of fruit costs, packing
materials, freight and handling, labor and overhead (including depreciation)
associated with preparing food products, and other direct expenses pertaining
to products sold. Gross margins increased by approximately $7.0 million, or
37.3%, from fiscal 2001 to 2002, principally as a result of increases in the
gross profit percentages
2002
Change
2001
Change
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
$
13,881
10.4
%
$
12,568
1.6
%
$
12,366
5.7
%
5.8
%
5.6
%
Selling, general and
administrative expenses include costs of marketing
and advertising, sales expenses, and other general and administrative costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $1.3
million from fiscal 2001 to 2002. The increase is attributable principally to
$0.6 million of additional administrative expenses, $0.6 million in incentives
paid to employees, and miscellaneous other net increases of $0.1 million.
2002
Change
2001
Change
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
$
(700
)
104.7
%
$
(342
)
NM
$
282
(0.3
)%
(0.2
)%
0.1
%
(NM is Not Meaningful)
Other
expense (income), net includes interest income and expense generated
in connection with our financing and operating activities, as well as certain
other transactions that are outside of the course of normal operations. During
fiscal 2002, other expense (income) includes interest accrued on notes
receivable from directors and officers of approximately $0.2 million. During
fiscal 2001, we recovered insurance proceeds related to the settlement of a
claim for damages sustained at our Santa Paula processing plant, which resulted
in a gain of approximately $0.5 million.
2002
Change
2001
Change
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
$
5,727
108.7
%
$
2,744
12.9
%
$
2,430
45.3
%
41.7
%
35.2
%
The effective
income tax rate for fiscal 2002 is higher than the federal
statutory rate principally due to state taxes, foreign taxes and the
non-deductibility of transaction costs related to our conversion from a
cooperative to a for-profit corporation. We anticipate that our effective tax
rate for fiscal 2003 will be slightly higher than 41.0%.
Prior to the merger, the
Cooperative was subject to income taxes for all
business activities other than the marketing and distribution of member
products. This exemption from taxation for the member business was contingent
on the distribution of all available proceeds to the Cooperatives members. Our
results for fiscal 2000 were restated in 2001 to correct an error in computing
the income tax provision related to the Cooperatives member business. The
effective income tax rate for fiscal 2001 is higher than the federal statutory
rate principally due to state taxes and nondeductible fines, penalties, and
transaction costs relating to the conversion. For additional details pertaining
to the components of our income tax provision and the restatement, please refer
to Notes 12 and 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report.
Three months ended
Oct. 31,
July 31,
Apr. 30,
Jan. 31,
Oct. 31,
July 31,
Apr. 30,
Jan. 31,
2002
2002
2002
2002
2001
2001
2001
2001
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
$
64,384
$
76,420
$
56,144
$
45,723
$
66,037
$
60,356
$
52,278
$
39,033
58,202
67,498
49,006
42,142
61,655
54,062
47,105
36,074
6,182
8,922
7,138
3,581
4,382
6,294
5,173
2,959
4,278
3,325
3,254
3,024
3,461
2,987
3,298
2,822
1,904
5,597
3,884
557
921
3,307
1,875
137
(363
)
(184
)
(145
)
(8
)
(121
)
(30
)
(239
)
48
2,267
5,781
4,029
565
1,042
3,337
2,114
89
1,059
2,657
1,758
253
434
1,519
764
27
$
1,208
$
3,124
$
2,271
$
312
$
608
$
1,818
$
1,350
$
62
$
0.10
$
0.26
$
0.20
$
0.03
$
0.06
$
0.17
$
0.13
$
0.01
$
0.10
$
0.26
$
0.19
$
0.03
$
0.06
$
0.17
$
0.13
$
0.01
12,307
11,836
11,637
10,466
10,464
10,461
10,457
10,416
12,377
11,906
11,670
10,466
10,464
10,461
10,457
10,416
Oct. 31,
July 31,
Apr. 30,
Jan. 31,
2001
2001
2001
2001
$
66,037
$
60,356
$
52,278
$
39,033
$
65,628
$
60,342
$
52,685
$
39,029
$
4,382
$
6,294
$
5,173
$
2,959
$
6,972
$
6,724
$
4,413
$
2,902
$
3,461
$
2,987
$
3,298
$
2,822
$
5,929
$
3,063
$
3,062
$
2,807
$
608
$
1,818
$
1,350
$
62
$
690
$
2,173
$
938
$
37
$
0.06
$
0.17
$
0.13
$
0.01
$
0.09
$
0.21
$
0.09
$
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
4-5 years
After 5 years
$
3,402
$
222
$
3,142
$
21
$
17
3,912
1,070
1,447
1,121
274
$
7,314
$
1,292
$
4,589
$
1,142
$
291
Expected maturity date October 31,
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
$
921
$
$
$
$
$
$
921
$
921
17,907
17,907
17,907
467
467
467
318
797
386
1,501
1,436
326
323
266
266
4,539
5,720
5,720
1,979
1,979
2,150
$
1,708
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,708
$
1,708
3,000
3,000
3,000
2,800
2,800
2,800
222
254
88
13
8
17
602
613
(1)
We believe the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, short-term advances to growers, accounts payable,
current borrowings pursuant to credit facilities and industrial
development and revenue bond approximate their fair value due to the
short maturity of these financial instruments.
(2)
Loans to growers bear fixed interest rates ranging from 0.0% to 10.0%
with a weighted-average interest rate of 8.0%. We believe that a
portfolio of loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a
return of 9.8%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease in
interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair
value of approximately $40,000.
(3)
Notes receivable from shareholders bear interest at 7.0%. We believe
that a portfolio of loans with a similar risk profile would currently
yield a return of 7.0%. We project the impact of an increase or
decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change
of fair value of approximately $259,000.
(4)
Our investments in United States government bonds are being held in
an irrevocable trust which has been designated to be used only to
satisfy the scheduled payments of interest and principal related to our
industrial development and revenue bonds. As these securities are
intended to be held to maturity their carrying value in our financial
statements is $1,979,000 reflecting their amortized cost. However, the
quoted fair value of these securities as of October 31, 2002
approximates $2,150,000. We project the impact of an increase or
decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change
of fair value of approximately $62,000. We did not purchase any
additional government bonds during fiscal 2002.
(5)
Fixed rate long-term obligations bear interest rates ranging from
3.3% to 9.9% with a weighted-average interest rate of 4.9%. We believe
that loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a return of
4.1%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease in interest
rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair value of
approximately $13,000. We retired long-term fixed-rate obligations with
a principal amount of $184,000 during fiscal 2002.
(All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
October 31,
2002
2001
$
921
$
2,057
17,907
19,797
12,461
9,075
3,945
3,209
467
1,119
2,535
2,372
225
144
1,252
553
39,713
38,326
9,497
9,442
1,979
1,874
3,943
2,726
$
55,132
$
52,368
$
6,368
$
6,909
1,708
1,529
7,015
3,848
3,000
15,800
2,567
222
441
20,880
28,527
3,180
3,429
516
383
3,696
3,812
13
10
24,221
10,158
(5,720
)
12,042
9,861
30,556
20,029
$
55,132
$
52,368
(All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended October 31,
2002
2001
2000
(As restated,
see note 14)
$
242,671
$
217,704
$
220,712
216,848
198,896
201,158
25,823
18,808
19,554
13,881
12,568
12,366
11,942
6,240
7,188
(700
)
(342
)
282
12,642
6,582
6,906
5,727
2,744
2,430
$
6,915
$
3,838
$
4,476
$
0.60
$
0.37
$
0.43
$
0.60
$
0.37
$
0.43
11,562
10,454
10,335
11,604
10,454
10,335
(All amounts in thousands)
Common Stock
Additional
Shareholder
Paid-in
Notes
Retained
Treasury
Shares
Amount
Capital
Receivable
Earnings
Stock
Total
9,847
$
10
$
9,947
$
$
7,621
$
(1
)
$
17,577
(1,101
)
(1,101
)
9,847
10
9,947
6,520
(1
)
16,476
(18
)
(18
)
(18
)
85
131
131
1
1
4,476
4,476
9,914
10
10,060
10,996
21,066
53
98
98
3,838
3,838
(4,973
)
(4,973
)
9,967
10
10,158
9,861
20,029
1,040
1
5,236
(4,789
)
448
549
1
2,166
(2,167
)
279
1,952
(1,952
)
1,000
1
4,709
4,710
1,021
1,021
(2,567
)
(2,567
)
6,915
6,915
12,835
$
13
$
24,221
$
(5,720
)
$
12,042
$
$
30,556
Year Ended October 31,
2002
2001
2000
(As restated,
see note 14)
$
6,915
$
3,838
$
4,476
1,957
1,988
1,748
35
87
717
29
(13
)
(585
)
1,855
(1,540
)
1,128
(3,386
)
(1,349
)
(1,730
)
(45
)
(144
)
60
(566
)
7
89
(1,953
)
(1,642
)
(428
)
(163
)
53
(1,945
)
652
(33
)
(1,059
)
(541
)
1,984
(1,870
)
3,346
(1,503
)
1,785
8,135
1,161
2,958
26
585
(1,973
)
(2,330
)
(1,297
)
(105
)
(284
)
(414
)
(2,078
)
(2,029
)
(1,685
)
(4,973
)
(1,180
)
(12,800
)
6,815
585
4,710
98
131
(536
)
(507
)
(758
)
412
1,021
(18
)
1
(7,193
)
1,433
(1,239
)
(1,136
)
565
34
2,057
1,492
1,458
$
921
$
2,057
$
1,492
$
443
$
821
$
797
$
6,362
$
4,291
$
696
$
4,789
$
$
$
2,167
$
$
$
36
$
$
$
1,952
$
$
$
2,567
$
$
$
68
$
56
$
2002
2001
2000
$
27,960
$
26,005
$
27,300
26,442
24,888
25,708
$
1,518
$
1,117
$
1,592
Fair Value
Carrying Value
$
1,436
$
1,501
5,720
5,720
2,150
1,979
613
602
October 31,
2002
2001
$
1,534
$
1,915
1,958
1,673
8,969
5,487
$
12,461
$
9,075
October 31,
2002
2001
$
1,177
$
1,177
9,800
9,726
176
172
23,316
21,720
2,792
2,484
70
12
37,331
35,291
(27,834
)
(25,849
)
$
9,497
$
9,442
2002
2001
$
1,979
$
1,874
2,150
2,023
2002
2001
$
2,800
$
2,800
471
975
131
95
3,402
3,870
(222
)
(441
)
$
3,180
$
3,429
Revenue
Revolving
Bond
Loan
Other
Total
$
$
176
$
46
$
222
230
24
254
2,800
65
23
2,888
13
13
8
8
17
17
$
2,800
$
471
$
131
$
3,402
2002
2001
$
428
$
435
6
5
33
33
87
5
(52
)
(50
)
$
502
$
428
2002
2001
2000
$
502
$
428
$
435
(22
)
74
88
$
480
$
502
$
523
2002
2001
2000
6.75
%
8.00
%
8.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
$
1,070
860
587
562
559
274
$
3,912
2002
2001
2000
$
4,540
$
2,019
$
2,395
1,181
586
522
572
132
63
6,293
2,737
2,980
(566
)
7
(550
)
$
5,727
$
2,744
$
2,430
2002
2001
$
126
$
4
772
369
354
179
1
$
1,252
$
553
$
(726
)
$
(606
)
210
223
$
(516
)
$
(383
)
2002
2001
2000
35
%
35
%
35
%
6
6
6
2
(1
)
(1
)
(1
)
3
2
(5
)
45
%
42
%
35
%
International
Avocados
and
Perishable
California
Food
Processed
Inter-segment
Avocados
Products
Products
Eliminations
Total
(All amounts are presented in thousands)
$
165,077
$
59,083
$
29,960
$
(11,449
)
$
242,671
147,796
55,372
25,129
(11,449
)
216,848
17,281
3,711
4,831
25,823
6,729
2,779
4,373
13,881
10,552
932
458
11,942
(523
)
(256
)
79
(700
)
11,075
1,188
379
12,642
5,017
538
172
5,727
$
6,058
$
650
$
207
$
$
6,915
$
149,158
$
47,048
$
30,107
$
(8,609
)
$
217,704
137,232
46,312
23,961
(8,609
)
198,896
11,926
736
6,146
18,808
5,758
2,471
4,339
12,568
6,168
(1,735
)
1,807
6,240
(168
)
30
(204
)
(342
)
6,336
(1,765
)
2,011
6,582
2,642
(736
)
838
2,744
$
3,694
$
(1,029
)
$
1,173
$
$
3,838
$
150,016
$
47,767
$
31,104
$
(8,175
)
$
220,712
142,786
44,872
21,675
(8,175
)
201,158
7,230
2,895
9,429
19,554
4,600
2,533
5,233
12,366
2,630
362
4,196
7,188
(29
)
187
124
282
2,659
175
4,072
6,906
935
62
1,433
2,430
$
1,724
$
113
$
2,639
$
$
4,476
Year ended October 31, 2002
International
Avocados and
California
Perishable Food
Processed
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
$
153,878
$
$
$
153,878
43,715
43,715
2,658
2,658
42
42
24,964
24,964
5,141
5,141
153,878
46,415
30,105
230,398
11,381
7,540
217
19,138
165,259
53,955
30,322
249,536
(182
)
(150
)
(6,533
)
(6,865
)
165,077
53,805
23,789
242,671
5,278
6,171
11,449
$
165,077
$
59,083
$
29,960
254,120
(11,449
)
$
242,671
Year ended October 31, 2001
International
Avocados and
California
Perishable Food
Processed
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
$
137,166
$
$
$
137,166
34,566
34,566
3,378
3,378
41
41
25,912
25,912
5,625
5,625
137,166
37,985
31,537
206,688
11,304
5,256
59
16,619
148,470
43,241
31,596
223,307
(276
)
(14
)
(5,313
)
(5,603
)
148,194
43,227
26,283
217,704
964
3,821
3,824
8,609
$
149,158
$
47,048
$
30,107
226,313
(8,609
)
$
217,704
Year ended October 31, 2000
International
Avocados and
California
Perishable Food
Processed
Avocados
Products
Products
Total
$
142,774
$
$
$
142,774
38,361
38,361
2,061
2,061
27,225
27,225
5,518
5,518
142,774
40,422
32,743
215,939
7,438
3,332
10,770
150,212
43,754
32,743
226,709
(209
)
(8
)
(5,780
)
(5,997
)
150,003
43,746
26,963
220,712
13
4,021
4,141
8,175
$
150,016
$
47,767
$
31,104
228,887
(8,175
)
$
220,712
United States
Mexico
Consolidated
$
12,654
$
2,765
$
15,419
$
11,692
$
2,350
$
14,042
October 31, 2000
As Previously
Reported
As Restated
$
2,162
$
2,430
4,744
4,476
0.48
0.43
4,031
5,400
12,365
10,996
22,435
21,066
Year ended October 31, 2002
Weighted-Average
Number of Shares
Exercise Price
$
1,240
5.00
(1,040
)
5.00
200
$
5.00
200
$
5.00
Outstanding and Exercisable
Average
Remaining
Number of
Contractual Life
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Shares
(Years)
Exercise Price
200
4.05
$
5.00
$
5,630
$
0.49
2.0
%
130
%
1.1
$
1.04
Calavo Growers, Inc.
Santa Ana, California
December 19, 2002, except for Note 17, as to
which the date is January 20, 2003
(a)
Executive Officers See Executive Officers in Part I., Item 4
hereof.
(b)
Directors the information required by this Item is incorporated by
reference to the section entitled Election of Directors in the Proxy
Statement.
(c)
Section 16(a) Information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
incorporated by reference to the section entitled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Proxy Statement.
Part IV
Item 14. Controls and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, we carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President and
our Vice President - Finance, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures, which are defined under Securities
and Exchange Commission rules as controls and other procedures of a company
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and
President and our Vice President - Finance concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or other
factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date
of their evaluation.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
51
52
53
(a)
(1)
Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2002 and
2001, and for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2002
are included herewith:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income,
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and
Independent Auditors Report.
(2)
Supplemental Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is
not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule,
or because the required information is included in the consolidated
financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description
2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of
February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo Growers
of California.*
3.1
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc.*
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.****
10.1
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.
10.2
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between Tropical
Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation, and Calavo
Growers of California.*
10.3
Lease Agreement (undated) between Tede S.A. de C.V., a Mexican
corporation, and Calavo Foods de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican
corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo Growers of
California dated October 25, 1994.*
10.4
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede S.A.
de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico, S.A. de
C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo
Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.*
Exhibit
Number
Description
10.5
Lease Intended as Security dated as of September 1, 2000 between
Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.6
Business Loan Agreement dated as of April 20, 1999 between Bank of
America National Trust and Savings Association and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.7
Amendment No. 2 to Business Loan Agreement (undated) between Bank
of America N.A. (formerly Bank of America National Trust and
Savings Association) and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.8
Loan Agreement dated as of September 1, 1985 between the Riverside
County Industrial Development Authority and Calavo Growers of
California relating to variable rate demand industrial development
revenue bonds.*
10.9
Reimbursement Agreement dated as of September 1, 1985 between
Security Pacific National Bank and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.10
Amendment No. Two to Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August
22, 1995 between Bank of America National Trust and Savings
Association (as successor to Security Pacific National Bank) and
Calavo Growers of California.*
10.11
Amendment No. Three to Reimbursement Agreement dated as of October
18, 2000 between Bank of America, N.A. (formerly Bank of America
National Trust and Savings Association) and Calavo Growers of
California.*
10.12
Master Loan Agreement dated as of June 15, 2000 between CoBank,
ACB and Calavo Growers of California, including attached Revolving
Credit Supplement dated June 15, 2000 between CoBank, ACB and
Calavo Growers of California.*
10.13
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated March 11,
1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of
California.*
10.14
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental
Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993 between
Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.15
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.**
10.16
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.**
21.1
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc.*
23.1
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
24.1
Powers of Attorney authorizing certain persons to sign this Annual
Report on Form 10-K on behalf of certain directors and officers of
the Company.
99.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
99.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
*
Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit our Registration
Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by
reference.
**
Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to our Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated
herein by reference.
***
Previously filed on August 15, 2001 as an exhibit to our Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated
herein by reference.
****
Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to our Report on Form
8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K
On
October 24, 2002, we filed a report on form 8-K announcing our new
dividend policy and the amendment of Article II of our Bylaws establishing,
among other things, a nomination process whereby a person intending to run for
a Board of Directors seat would be required to provide us advanced
notification.
(c)
Exhibits
See subsection (a)(3) above.
(d)
Financial Statement Schedules
See subsection (a)(1) and (2) above.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City
of Santa Ana, State of California, on this 27th day of January, 2003.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this report has been signed on the 27th day of January, 2003 by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities
indicated:
54
CALAVO GROWERS, INC
By:
/s/ Lecil E. Cole
Lecil E. Cole
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Signature
Title
/s/ Lecil E. Cole
Lecil E. Cole
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Wolfgang P. Hombrecher.
Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
Vice President, Finance and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Donald M. Sanders*
Donald M. Sanders
Director
/s/ Fred J. Ferrazzano*
Fred J. Ferrazzano
Director
/s/ John M. Hunt*
John M. Hunt
Director
/s/ Roy V. Keenan*
Roy V. Keenan
Director
/s/ J. Link Leavens*
J. Link Leavens
Director
/s/ Alva V. Snider*
Alva V. Snider
Director
/s/ Dorcas H. McFarlane*
Dorcas H. McFarlane
Director
/s/ Scott Van Der Kar*
Scott Van Der Kar
Director
*By: /s/ LECIL E. COLE
Lecil E. Cole
Attorney-in-Fact**
**
By authority of the power of attorney filed as Exhibit 24.1 hereto.
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Lecil E. Cole, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calavo Growers, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
Report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and
6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: January 27, 2003
/s/ Lecil E. Cole
55
I, Wolfgang P. Hombrecher, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calavo Growers, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
Report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and
6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: January 27, 2003
/s/ Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
56
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President
Vice President - Finance and Corporate Secretary
SCHEDULE II
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (in thousands)
(2) Write-off of assets
Fiscal year
Balance at
Balance at
ended
beginning
end
October 31:
of year
Additions(1)
Deductions(2)
of year
2000
$
3
$
717
$
671
$
49
2001
49
87
127
9
2002
9
35
19
25
(1) Charged to costs and expenses
57
EXHIBIT INDEX
58
Exhibit
Number
Description
2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of
February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo Growers
of California.*
3.1
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc.*
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.****
10.1
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.
10.2
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between Tropical
Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation, and Calavo
Growers of California.*
10.3
Lease Agreement (undated) between Tede S.A. de C.V., a Mexican
corporation, and Calavo Foods de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican
corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo Growers of
California dated October 25, 1994.*
10.4
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede S.A.
de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico, S.A. de
C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo
Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.*
10.5
Lease Intended as Security dated as of September 1, 2000 between
Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.6
Business Loan Agreement dated as of April 20, 1999 between Bank of
America National Trust and Savings Association and Calavo Growers
of California.*
10.7
Amendment No. 2 to Business Loan Agreement (undated) between Bank
of America N.A. (formerly Bank of America National Trust and
Savings Association) and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.8
Loan Agreement dated as of September 1, 1985 between the Riverside
County Industrial Development Authority and Calavo Growers of
California relating to variable rate demand industrial development
revenue bonds.*
10.9
Reimbursement Agreement dated as of September 1, 1985 between
Security Pacific National Bank and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.10
Amendment No. Two to Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August
22, 1995 between Bank of America National Trust and Savings
Association (as successor to Security Pacific National Bank) and
Calavo Growers of California.*
10.11
Amendment No. Three to Reimbursement Agreement dated as of October
18, 2000 between Bank of America, N.A. (formerly Bank of America
National Trust and Savings Association) and Calavo Growers of
California.*
10.12
Master Loan Agreement dated as of June 15, 2000 between CoBank,
ACB and Calavo Growers of California, including attached Revolving
Credit Supplement dated June 15, 2000 between CoBank, ACB and
Calavo Growers of California.*
10.13
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated March 11,
1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of
California.*
10.14
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993 between
Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California.*
10.15
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.**
10.16
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.**
21.1
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc.*
23.1
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
24.1
Powers of Attorney
authorizing certain persons to sign this Annual Report on Form 10-K
on behalf of certain directors and officers of the Company.
Exhibit
Number
Description
99.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
99.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
*
Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated
herein by reference.
**
Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated
herein by reference.
***
Previously filed on August 15, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated
herein by reference.
****
Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to our Report on Form
8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
59
EXHIBIT 10.1
The First Name In Avocados
AVOCADO MARKETING AGREEMENT
This avocado marketing agreement is being entered into by and between CALAVO GROWERS, INC. (Calavo), whose mailing address is 2530 Red Hill Avenue, Santa Ana, California, 92705-5542, and _________________________________________ (Grower), whose mailing address is _____________________________________________________________and whose social security or federal tax identification number is ______________________________.
This Agreement shall be effective ______________________________, and shall continue in effect until terminated at any time by either party upon written notice to the other.
Grower shall deliver California avocados to Calavo and deliveries will be acknowledged by the issuance of Calavo receipt forms.
Calavo agrees to receive, handle, market and sell the avocados in such markets and at such prices and at such terms as Calavo shall determine. Title will pass to Calavo upon delivery to Calavos facility. Calavo will apply its grades and standards in the handling of the avocados and Grower agrees to be bound by Calavos grades and standards.
Calavo will pay Grower for delivered avocados by variety, size and grade on a pooled basis on approximately the 15th (fifteenth) day of the month following delivery. Calavo will deduct from its payment to Grower any advances on picking and hauling, Marketing Order assessments and other normal or mandatory deductions that are customary in the industry.
Grower warrants that the avocados have been grown and harvested in conformity with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
Grower warrants that he is the owner of the avocados.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Calavo and Grower and may not be modified except by both parties written agreement.
This Agreement is made under the laws of the State of California and may be terminated at any time by either party upon written notice.
Any dispute under this Agreement shall be resolved by arbitration in Santa Ana,
California pursuant to the rules, then obtaining, of the American Arbitration
Association and the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys
fees and all costs.
GROWER
CALAVO GROWERS, INC
Executed at:___________________________
(City)
This Date:______________________________
By:________________________________
By:___________________________________
(Growers Signature)
Date:_______________________________
EXHIBIT 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-75378 of Calavo Growers, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 19,
2002, except for Note 17, as to which the date is January 20, 2003 which
expresses an unqualified opinion but contains explanatory paragraphs relating
to the restatement discussed in Note 14, and the common control merger,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
2002.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
January 24, 2003
61
EXHIBIT 24.1
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Director and/or Officer of Calavo Growers, Inc., a
California corporation (the Company), hereby constitute LECIL E. COLE and
WOLFGANG P. HOMBRECHER., and each of them singly, my true and lawful attorneys
with full power to them and each of them to sign for me, and in my name and in
the capacity or capacities indicated below, the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002, and any amendments thereto.
Signature
Title
/s/ Lecil E. Cole
Lecil E. Cole
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
Vice President, Finance and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Donald M. Sanders
Donald M. Sanders
Director
/s/ Fred J. Ferrazzano
Fred J. Ferrazzano
Director
/s/ John M. Hunt
John M. Hunt
Director
/s/ Roy V. Keenan
Roy V. Keenan
Director
/s/ J. Link Leavens
J. Link Leavens
Director
/s/ Alva V. Snider
Alva V. Snider
Director
/s/ Dorcas H. McFarlane
Dorcas H. McFarlane
Director
/s/ Scott Van Der Kar
Scott Van Der Kar
Director
62
Exhibit 99.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lecil E. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | ||
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ | Lecil E. Cole |
|
63
Exhibit 99.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wolfgang P. Hombrecher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | ||
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Wolfgang P. Hombrecher
64