UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 001-2979
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
41-0449260
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94104
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 1-800-292-9932
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Shares Outstanding | ||||
October 31, 2003 | ||||
Common stock, $1-2/3 par value
|
1,692,029,166 |
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I | Financial Information | |||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | Page | ||||||
Consolidated Statement of Income
|
2 | |||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
3 | |||||||
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
and Comprehensive Income
|
4 | |||||||
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
5 | |||||||
Notes to Financial Statements
|
6 | |||||||
Item 2.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) | |||||||
Summary Financial Data
|
31 | |||||||
Overview
|
32 | |||||||
Critical Accounting Policies
|
35 | |||||||
Earnings Performance
|
35 | |||||||
Net Interest Income
|
35 | |||||||
Noninterest Income
|
39 | |||||||
Noninterest Expense
|
41 | |||||||
Income Taxes
|
42 | |||||||
Operating Segment Results
|
42 | |||||||
Balance Sheet Analysis
|
43 | |||||||
Securities Available for Sale
|
43 | |||||||
Loan Portfolio
|
45 | |||||||
Nonaccrual Loans and Other Assets
|
46 | |||||||
Loans 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing
|
47 | |||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
48 | |||||||
Other Assets
|
49 | |||||||
Deposits
|
50 | |||||||
Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements
|
51 | |||||||
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
|
51 | |||||||
Asset/Liability and Market Risk Management
|
52 | |||||||
Capital Management
|
56 | |||||||
Factors that May Affect Future Results
|
57 | |||||||
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 52 | ||||||
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures | |||||||
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
63 | |||||||
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
63 | |||||||
PART II
|
Other Information | |||||||
Item 6.
|
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 64 | ||||||
Signature | 67 | |||||||
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
2
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
3
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
4
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
5
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated) (the Company) is a
diversified financial services company providing banking, insurance,
investments, mortgage banking and consumer finance through banking stores, the
internet and other distribution channels to consumers, businesses and financial
institutions in all 50 states of the U.S. and in other countries. Wells Fargo &
Company (the Parent) is a financial holding company and a bank holding company.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and prevailing practices in the financial
services industry. Preparing the financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
income and expenses during the reporting period. Certain amounts in the
financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with
the current financial statement presentation.
The information furnished in these unaudited interim statements reflects all
adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair
statement of the results for the periods presented. These adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. The
results of operations in the interim statements do not necessarily indicate the
results that may be expected for the full year. The interim financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2002 Annual Report
on Form 10-K (2002 Form 10-K).
Descriptions of the significant accounting policies of the Company are included
in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements
in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes to
these policies, except as noted below.
CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of
the Parent, and its majority-owned subsidiaries, which are consolidated on a
line-by-line basis. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation. Other affiliates in which there is at least 20%
ownership are generally accounted for by the equity method; those in which
there is less than 20% ownership are generally carried at cost, except for
marketable equity securities, which are carried at fair value with changes in
fair value included in other comprehensive income, and certain variable
interest entities as described below. Assets that are accounted for by either
the equity or cost method are included in other assets.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
,
which clarifies consolidation requirements for certain entities in which the
equity investors do not have a controlling financial interest or do not have
sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated financial support from other parties. These entities
are referred to as variable
6
interest entities (VIEs). An enterprises variable interest in a variable
interest entity arises from either contractual, ownership, or other monetary
interests in the entity, which change with the entitys net asset value
changes. Effective for VIEs formed after January 31, 2003, and effective for
all existing VIEs on December 31, 2003, the Company must consolidate a VIE if
it will absorb a majority of the entitys expected losses, receive a majority
of the entitys expected residual returns, or both.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company has several stock-based employee compensation plans, which are
described more fully in Note 14 (Common Stock and Stock Plans) to Financial
Statements in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K. As permitted by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (FAS 123),
Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation
, the Company uses the intrinsic value method of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
, to
account for its stock-based employee compensation plans. Pro forma net income
and earnings per common share information is provided as if the Company
accounted for its employee stock option plans under the fair value method of
FAS 123.
7
2.
Business Combinations
The Company regularly explores opportunities to acquire financial institutions
and related financial services businesses. Generally, management of the Company
does not make a public announcement about an acquisition opportunity until a
definitive agreement has been signed.
Transactions completed in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 include:
The Company had three pending business combinations as of September 30, 2003,
with approximately $3.0 billion in total assets, including the pending
acquisition of Pacific Northwest Bancorp, with approximately $2.9 billion in
assets. These transactions were subsequently completed on October 31, 2003.
8
3.
Intangible Assets
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for intangible assets
are presented in the following table:
The following table shows the current period and estimated future amortization
expense for amortized intangible assets:
The projections of amortization expense shown above for mortgage servicing
rights are based on existing asset balances and the existing interest rate
environment as of September 30, 2003. Future amortization expense may be
significantly different depending upon changes in the mortgage servicing
portfolio, mortgage interest rates and market conditions. The projections of
amortization expense shown above for core deposit intangibles are based on
existing asset balances at September 30, 2003. Future amortization expense may
vary based on additional core deposit intangibles acquired through business
combinations.
9
4.
Goodwill
The following table summarizes changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as
allocated to the Companys operating segments for the purpose of goodwill
impairment analysis.
Goodwill amounts allocated to the operating segments for goodwill impairment
analysis differ from amounts allocated to the Companys operating segments for
management reporting discussed in Note 7 (Operating Segments). The balance of
goodwill for management reporting is summarized below:
10
5.
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 20 million shares of preferred stock and 4
million shares of preference stock, both without par value. All preferred
shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and
liquidation preference but have no general voting rights. No preference shares
have been issued under this authorization.
The table below is a summary of the Companys preferred stock. A detailed
description of the Companys preferred stock is provided in Note 13 (Preferred
Stock) to Financial Statements included in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
11
6.
Earnings Per Common Share
The table below shows earnings per common share, diluted earnings per common
share and a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of both earnings
per common share calculations.
At September 30, 2003 and 2002, options to purchase 34.7 million and 36.5
million shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the
computation of earnings per share. The exercise price was higher than the
market price, and the options were therefore antidilutive.
12
7.
Operating Segments
The Company has three lines of business for management reporting: Community
Banking, Wholesale Banking and Wells Fargo Financial. The results for these
lines of business are based on the Companys management accounting process,
which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each responsible
operating segment. This process is dynamic and, unlike financial accounting,
there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management accounting
equivalent to GAAP. The management accounting process measures the performance
of the operating segments based on the Companys management structure and is
not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial
services companies. The Companys operating segments are defined by product
type and customer segments. Changes in management structure and/or the
allocation process may result in changes in allocations, transfers and
assignments. In that case, results for prior periods would be (and have been)
restated for comparability.
The Community Banking Group
offers a complete line of diversified financial
products and services to individual consumers and small businesses with annual
sales generally up to $10 million in which the owner generally is the financial
decision maker. Community Banking also offers investment management and other
services to retail customers and high net worth individuals, securities
brokerage and insurance through affiliates and venture capital financing. These
products and services include
Wells Fargo Funds
®, a family of mutual funds, as
well as personal trust, employee benefit trust and agency assets. Loan products
include lines of credit, equity lines and loans, equipment and transportation
(auto, recreational vehicle and marine) loans, education loans, origination and
purchase of residential mortgage loans, servicing of mortgage loans and credit cards. Other credit products
and financial services available to small businesses and their owners include
receivables and inventory financing, equipment leases, real estate financing,
Small Business Administration financing, venture capital financing, cash
management, payroll services, retirement plans, medical savings
accounts and
credit and debit card processing. Consumer and business
deposit products include checking accounts, savings deposits, market rate
accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), time deposits and debit cards.
Community Banking provides access to customers through a wide range of
channels, which encompass a network of traditional banking stores, in-store
banking centers, business centers and ATMs. Additionally,
PhoneBank
SM centers
and the National Business Banking Center provide 24-hour telephone service.
Online banking services include single sign-on to online banking, bill pay and
brokerage, as well as online banking for small business.
The Wholesale Banking Group
serves businesses across the United States with
annual sales generally in excess of $10 million. Wholesale Banking provides a
complete line of commercial, corporate and real estate banking products and
services. These include traditional commercial loans and lines of credit,
letters of credit, asset-based lending, equipment leasing, mezzanine financing,
high-yield debt, international trade facilities, foreign exchange services,
treasury management, investment management, institutional fixed income and
equity sales, online/electronic products, insurance brokerage services, and
investment banking services. Wholesale Banking includes the majority ownership
interest in the Wells Fargo HSBC Trade
13
Bank, which provides trade financing,
letters of credit and collection services and is sometimes supported by the
Export-Import Bank of the United States (a public agency of the United States
offering export finance support for American-made products). Wholesale Banking
also supports the commercial real estate market with products and services such
as construction loans for commercial and residential development, land
acquisition and development loans, secured and unsecured lines of credit,
interim financing arrangements for completed structures, rehabilitation loans,
affordable housing loans and letters of credit, permanent loans for
securitization, commercial real estate loan servicing and real estate and
mortgage brokerage services.
Wells Fargo Financial
includes consumer finance and auto finance operations.
Consumer finance operations make direct consumer and real estate loans to
individuals and purchase sales finance contracts from retail merchants from
offices throughout the United States, Canada and in the Caribbean. Automobile
finance operations specialize in purchasing sales finance contracts directly
from automobile dealers and making loans secured by automobiles in the United
States and Puerto Rico. Wells Fargo Financial also provides credit cards, and
lease and other commercial financing.
The Reconciliation Column
consists of Corporate level equity investment
activities and balances and unallocated goodwill balances held at the
enterprise level.
14
The following table provides the results for the Companys three major
operating segments.
15
8.
Mortgage Banking Activities
Mortgage banking activities, included in the Community Banking and Wholesale
Banking operating segments, consist of residential and commercial mortgage
originations and servicing.
The components of mortgage banking noninterest income are presented below:
Net of valuation allowance, mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) totaled $5.8
billion (1.03% of total mortgage loans serviced for others) at
September 30, 2003, compared with $4.4 billion (.89%) at September 30, 2002.
Each quarter, the Company evaluates MSRs for possible impairment based on the
difference between the carrying amount and current fair value of the MSRs, in
accordance with FAS 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities
. If a temporary impairment exists, a
valuation allowance is established for any excess of amortized cost, as
adjusted for hedge accounting, over the current fair value through a charge to
income. The Company has a policy of reviewing MSRs for other-than-temporary
impairment each quarter and recognizes a direct write-down when the
recoverability of a recorded valuation allowance is determined to be remote.
Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the
carrying value of the MSRs asset and the valuation allowance, precluding
subsequent reversals. See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -
Transfer and Servicing of Financial Assets) to Financial Statements in the
Companys 2002 Form 10-K for additional discussion of the Companys policy for
valuation of MSRs. The Company determined that a portion of the asset was not
recoverable and reduced both the asset and the previously designated valuation
allowance by a write-down of $492 million and $1,338 million in the quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, and $887 million in the
quarter ended September 30, 2002.
16
The following table summarizes the changes in mortgage servicing rights:
The following table provides the components of the Companys managed servicing portfolio:
17
9.
Guarantees
Significant guarantees that the Company provides to third parties include
standby letters of credit, various indemnification agreements, guarantees
accounted for as derivatives, contingent consideration related to certain
business combinations and contingent performance guarantees.
The Company issues standby letters of credit, which include performance and
financial guarantees, on behalf of customers in connection with contracts
between the customers and third parties whereby the Company assures that the
third parties will receive specified funds if customers fail to meet their
contractual obligations. Standby letters of credit totaled $7.8 billion at
September 30, 2003, including financial guarantees of $4.0 billion that the
Company had issued or purchased participations in. A major portion of fees
received from the issuance of standby letters of credit are deferred and, at
September 30, 2003, were immaterial to the Companys financial statements.
The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
business under which the Company agrees to indemnify third parties against any
damages, losses and expenses incurred in connection with legal and other
proceedings arising from relationships or transactions with the Company. These
relationships or transactions include those arising from service as a director
or officer of the Company, underwriting agreements relating to the Companys
securities, securities lending, acquisition agreements, and various other
business transactions or arrangements. Because the extent of the Companys
obligations under these indemnification agreements depends entirely upon the
occurrence of future events, the Companys potential future liability under
these agreements is not determinable.
The Company writes options, floors and caps. Options are exercisable based on
favorable market conditions. Periodic settlements occur on floors and caps
based on market conditions. At September 30, 2003, the fair value reflected in
the Companys balance sheet of the written options liability was $316 million
and the written floors and caps liability was $208 million. The Companys
ultimate obligation under written options, floors and caps is based on future
market conditions and is only quantifiable at settlement. Options written to
customers are predominantly offset with purchased options; other written
options are entered into to mitigate balance sheet risk.
The Company also enters into credit default swaps under which it buys
protection from or sells protection to a counterparty in the event of default
of a reference obligation. At September 30, 2003, the gross carrying amount of
the contracts sold was a $15 million liability. The maximum amount the Company
would be required to pay under those swaps in which it sold protection,
assuming all reference obligations default at a total loss, without recoveries,
was $2.52 billion. The Company has bought protection of $2.51 billion of
notional exposure. Almost all of the protection purchases offset (i.e., use the
same reference obligation and maturity) the contracts in which the Company is
providing protection to a counterparty.
18
In connection with certain brokerage, asset management and insurance agency
acquisitions made by the Company, the terms of the acquisition agreement
provide for deferred payments or additional consideration based on certain
performance targets. At September 30, 2003, the amount of contingent
consideration expected to be paid was not material to the Companys financial
statements.
The Company has entered into various contingent performance guarantees through
credit risk participation arrangements with terms ranging from 1 to 30 years.
The Company will be required to make payments under these guarantees if a
customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain credit agreements
with third parties. Because the extent of the Companys obligations under these
contingent performance guarantees depends entirely upon future events, the
Companys potential future liability under these agreements is not
determinable.
19
10.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Fair Value Hedges
The Company uses derivative contracts to manage the risk associated with
changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and other retained
interests. Derivative gains or losses caused by market conditions (volatility)
and the spread between spot and forward rates priced into the derivative
contracts (the passage of time) are excluded from the overall evaluation of
hedge effectiveness, but are reflected in earnings. The change in value of
derivatives excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness was a net gain
of $267 million and $916 million in the third quarter and first nine months of
2003, respectively, compared with a net gain of $432 million and $910 million
in the same periods of 2002. The ineffective portion of the change in value of
these derivatives was a net loss of $473 million and $164 million in the third
quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with a net gain
of $338 million and $934 million in the same periods of 2002. The net
derivative loss of $206 million in the third quarter of 2003 was offset by a
reversal of the valuation provision for impairment on mortgage servicing rights
of $238 million in the third quarter of 2003. The net derivative gain of $752
million in the first nine months of 2003 was more than offset by higher
valuation provision (net of reversal) for impairment on mortgage servicing
rights of $974 million. The total gains on the mortgage-related derivative
contracts and valuation provision for impairment are included in mortgage
banking noninterest income. See Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities).
In fourth quarter 2002, the Company began using derivative contracts to hedge
changes in fair value of certain commercial real estate mortgages and franchise
loans due to changes in LIBOR interest rates. The Company originates these
loans with the intent to sell them. The ineffective portion of these fair value
hedges was a net loss of $6 million and $17 million for the third quarter and
first nine months of 2003, respectively, recorded in mortgage banking
noninterest income. All components of gain or loss on these derivative
contracts are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The Company also enters into interest rate swaps to convert certain of its
fixed-rate senior and subordinated debt to floating-rate debt. The ineffective
portion of these fair value hedges was not material in the third quarter and
first nine months of 2003 and 2002.
As of September 30, 2003, all designated fair value hedges continued to qualify
as fair value hedges.
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge forecasted sales of its mortgage
loans and to convert commercial floating-rate loans and certain of its
floating-rate senior debt to fixed rates. The Company recognized a net gain of
$131 million and $77 million in the third quarter and first nine months of
2003, respectively, which represents the total ineffectiveness of cash flow
hedges, compared with a net loss of $81 million and $250 million in the same
periods of 2002. All components of gain or loss on these derivative contracts
are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. As of September 30,
2003, all designated cash flow hedges continued to qualify as cash flow hedges.
20
At September 30, 2003, the Company expected that $389 million of deferred net
losses on derivative instruments included in other comprehensive income will be
reclassified to earnings during the next twelve months, compared with $102
million of deferred net losses at September 30, 2002. Gains and losses on
derivative contracts that are reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive
income to current period earnings are included in the same line item in which
the hedged items effect in earnings is recorded. The Company is hedging its
exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted
transactions for a maximum of two years for hedges converting floating-rate
loans to fixed, four years for hedges converting floating-rate senior debt to
fixed, and one year for hedges of forecasted sales of mortgage loans.
Derivative Financial Instruments Summary Information
The following table summarizes the credit risk amount and estimated net fair
value for the Companys derivative financial instruments.
21
11.
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Companys Subordinated Debentures
In February 2002, the Company formed Wells Fargo Capital VII and Wells Fargo
Capital VIII (the Trusts), to issue trust preferred securities. In May 2003,
Wells Fargo Capital VII issued to the public $500 million in trust preferred
securities in the form of its 5.85% Capital Securities and issued to the
Company $15 million of trust common securities. Wells Fargo Capital VII used
the proceeds to purchase $515 million of the Companys 5.85% junior
subordinated debentures due May 2033 (the May Debentures). In July 2003, Wells
Fargo Capital VIII issued to the public $200 million in trust preferred
securities in the form of its 5.625% Capital Securities and issued to the
Company $6 million of trust common securities. Wells Fargo Capital VIII used
the proceeds to purchase $206 million of the Companys 5.625% junior
subordinated debentures due August 2033 (together with the May Debentures, the
Debentures). The Debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts and are
subordinate to all of the Companys existing and future obligations for
borrowed or purchased money, obligations under letters of credit and certain
derivative contracts, and any guarantees by the Company of any of such
obligations. Concurrent with the issuance of the Debentures and the trust
preferred and common securities, the Company issued a guarantee related to the
trust preferred securities for the benefit of the holders.
The Company treats the trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital. The
Debentures, the common securities issued by the Trusts, and the related income
effects are eliminated within the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Companys obligations under the Debentures, the related indentures, the
trust agreements relating to the trust securities, and the guarantee constitute
a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of the
Trusts under the trust preferred securities.
The Debentures are subject to redemption at the option of the Company, subject
to prior regulatory approval, in whole or in part on or after May 2008 for
Wells Fargo Capital VII and July 2008 for Wells Fargo Capital VIII, or in
whole, but not in part, within 90 days after the occurrence of certain events
that either would have a negative tax effect on the Trusts or the Company,
would cause the trust preferred securities to no longer qualify as Tier 1
capital, or would result in the Trusts being treated as investment companies.
Upon repayment of the Debentures at their stated maturity or following their
earlier redemption, the Trusts will use the proceeds of such repayment to
redeem an equivalent amount of outstanding trust preferred securities and trust
common securities.
22
12.
Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
Following are the condensed consolidating financial statements of the Parent
and Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (WFFI). The
Wells Fargo Financial business segment for management reporting (See Note 7 to
Financial Statements) consists of WFFI and other affiliated consumer finance
entities managed by WFFI but not included in WFFI reported below.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
23
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
24
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
25
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
26
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
27
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
28
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
29
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
30
FINANCIAL REVIEW
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
31
This report, including the Financial Statements and related Notes and the
information in response to Items 2, 3 and 4 of Form 10-Q, contains
forward-looking statements about the Company. Broadly speaking, forward-looking
statements include forecasts of future financial results and condition,
expectations for future operations and business, and any assumptions underlying
those forecasts and expectations. Do not unduly rely on forward-looking
statements. Actual outcomes and results might differ significantly from
forecasts and expectations. Please refer to Factors that May Affect Future
Results beginning on page 57 of this report for a discussion of some of the
factors that may cause results to differ.
OVERVIEW
Wells Fargo & Company is a $391 billion diversified financial services company
providing banking, insurance, investments, mortgage banking and consumer
finance through banking stores, the internet and other distribution channels to
consumers, businesses and financial institutions in all 50 states of the U.S.
and in other countries. It ranked fourth in assets and third in market
capitalization among U.S. bank holding companies at September 30, 2003. In this
Form 10-Q, Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated) is referred to
as the Company and Wells Fargo & Company alone is referred to as the Parent.
Certain amounts in the Financial Review for prior periods have been
reclassified to conform with the current financial statement presentation.
Net income for third quarter 2003 increased 8% to $1.56 billion, from $1.44
billion for third quarter 2002. Diluted earnings per common share for third
quarter 2003 were $.92, up 10%, compared with $.84 for third quarter 2002.
Return on average assets (ROA) was 1.57% and return of average common equity
(ROE) was 18.86% for third quarter 2003, compared with 1.78% and 19.38%,
respectively, for the same period of 2002.
In third quarter 2003, taking advantage of interest rates and equity markets,
the Company took a number of strategic actions which will benefit future
financial performance but which had the effect of reducing third quarter 2003
earnings by $171 million after-tax, or $.10 per share. These actions included
repositioning the bond portfolio, retiring $1.8 billion of term debt previously
issued at higher costs, contributing approximately 40% of the Companys public
stock portfolio to the Wells Fargo Foundation (a tax-efficient way of funding
this expense), consolidating certain Company-owned facilities and operations to
reduce future occupancy and operating costs, and renegotiating certain vendor
contracts to reduce on-going equipment and software expenses. The $.10 per
share reduction in earnings from these actions, which will benefit future
financial performance, includes both revenue and expense impacts and is after
the net tax benefits associated with the public stock donations.
Net income for the first nine months of 2003 was $4.58 billion, or $2.70 per
share, compared with $4.24 billion, or $2.46 per share, before the effect of a
first quarter accounting change related to FAS 142,
Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets
, for the first nine months of 2002. On the same basis, ROA
was 1.63% in the first nine months of 2003, compared with 1.80% for the first
nine months of 2002. ROE was 19.39% in the first nine months of 2003, compared
with 19.69% for the first nine months of 2002.
32
Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $4.23 billion for third
quarter 2003 and $12.24 billion for the first nine months of 2003, compared
with $3.72 billion and $11.07 billion for the same periods of 2002. The
Companys net interest margin was 5.03% and 5.14% for the third quarter and
first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with 5.52% and 5.62% for the
same periods of 2002.
Noninterest income was $2.96 billion and $8.25 billion for the third quarter
and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with $2.35 billion and
$7.02 billion for the same periods of 2002. The strategic actions taken in
third quarter 2003 reduced noninterest income by $100 million.
Revenue, the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, increased 19%
to $7.17 billion in third quarter 2003 from $6.04 billion in third quarter
2002. Revenue increased 13% to $20.43 billion in the first nine months of 2003
from $18.01 billion in the first nine months of 2002.
Noninterest expense was $4.40 billion and $12.15 billion for the third quarter
and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with $3.41 billion and
$10.14 billion for the same periods of 2002. The strategic actions taken in
third quarter 2003 accounted for $233 million, or 23%, of the growth in
expenses from third quarter 2002. These strategic actions were part of the
Companys on-going efforts to improve operating efficiency and will reduce
future donations expense, occupancy costs and equipment and software costs.
During third quarter 2003, net charge-offs were $434 million, or .78% of
average total loans (annualized), compared with $415 million, or .91%, in third
quarter 2002. The provision for loan losses was $434 million and $1,283 million
in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with
$395 million and $1,295 million in the same periods of 2002. The allowance for
loan losses was $3.89 billion, or 1.68% of total loans, at September 30, 2003,
compared with $3.86 billion, or 1.96%, at December 31, 2002 and $3.86 billion,
or 2.07%, at September 30, 2002.
At September 30, 2003, total nonaccrual loans were $1.52 billion, or .65% of
total loans, compared with $1.49 billion, or .76%, at December 31, 2002 and
$1.55 billion, or .83%, at September 30, 2002. Foreclosed assets were $200
million at September 30, 2003, $201 million at December 31, 2002 and $186
million at September 30, 2002.
The ratio of common stockholders equity to total assets was 8.27% at September
30, 2003, compared with 8.67% at December 31, 2002 and 8.98% at September 30,
2002. The Companys total risk-based capital (RBC) ratio at September 30, 2003
was 11.53% and its Tier 1 RBC ratio was 8.07%, exceeding the minimum
regulatory guidelines of 8% and 4%, respectively, for bank holding companies.
The Companys RBC ratios at September 30, 2002 were 11.39% and 7.84%,
respectively. The Companys Tier 1 leverage ratios were 6.44% and 6.83% at
September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, exceeding the minimum regulatory
guideline of 3% for bank holding companies.
33
Recent Accounting Standards
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
.
The recognition and measurement provisions of this Interpretation are effective
for newly created variable interest entities (VIEs) formed after January 31,
2003. On October 9, 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46-6 which delayed the
recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 46 for existing VIEs to the first
interim or annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2003. The Company
adopted the disclosure provisions of FIN 46 effective December 31, 2002. The
Company adopted the recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 46 for newly
formed VIEs effective February 1, 2003, which did not have a material effect on
the Companys financial statements. The Company intends to adopt the
recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 46 for existing VIEs on December
31, 2003. The Company does not expect that the adoption of FIN 46 will have a
material effect on the Companys financial statements.
The Company is a majority variable interest holder in certain special purpose
entities that are expected to be consolidated effective
December 31, 2003, and
that were formed to invest in securities and to securitize high-yield corporate
debt and real estate investment trust securities. These entities had
approximately $800 million in total assets at September 30, 2003. The maximum
estimated exposure to loss for these entities was approximately $300 million.
Also, the Company holds variable interests generally greater than 20% but less
than 50% in certain special purpose entities formed to provide affordable
housing and to securitize high-yield corporate debt that had approximately $1.7
billion in total assets at September 30, 2003, and a maximum estimated exposure
to loss of approximately $400 million. These entities are not expected to be
required to be consolidated.
Historically, issuer trusts that issued trust preferred securities have been
consolidated by their parent companies and trust preferred securities have been
treated as eligible for Tier 1 capital treatment by bank holding companies
under Federal Reserve rules and regulations relating to minority interests in
equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Applying the provisions of FIN
46, the Company may no longer be permitted to consolidate the issuer trusts,
beginning on December 31, 2003, in preparing its financial statements. Although
the Federal Reserve has stated in its July 2, 2003 Supervisory Letter that
trust preferred securities will be treated as Tier 1 capital until notice is
given to the contrary, the Supervisory Letter also indicates that the Federal
Reserve will review the regulatory implications of any accounting treatment
changes and will provide further guidance if necessary or warranted.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
149 (FAS 149),
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities
, to provide additional clarification of certain terms and investment
characteristics. This statement will be applied prospectively and is effective
for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The Company does
not expect that the adoption of FAS 149 will have a material effect on the
Companys financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150 (FAS 150)
Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity
. FAS
150 establishes standards
34
for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer
classify these financial instruments as liabilities (or an asset in some
circumstances). Many of those instruments, including mandatorily redeemable
preferred securities, were previously classified as equity or as mezzanine
debt. The Company adopted FAS 150 effective July 1, 2003 and the adoption of
the standard did not have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.
In May 2003, the Emerging Issues Task
Force published Topic D-107,
Lessor Consideration of Third-Party
Residual Value Guarantees
, which specifies accounting guidance
for certain lease transactions with residual value guarantees. The
Company anticipates reclassifying auto leases impacted by the
announcements as operating leases. The Company does not expect
that adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its results of operations
for any period in which such leasing activities were present (1998
through the current period). The Company plans on implementing this
guidance not later than January 1, 2004.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys accounting policies are fundamental to understanding managements
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The
Company has identified three policies that it believes are critical because
they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective and/or
complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of
the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under
different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies relate to
the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights and
pension accounting. The Company, in consultation with the Audit and Examination
Committee of the Board of Directors, has reviewed and approved these critical
accounting policies, which are further described in Financial Review -
Critical Accounting Policies and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies) to Financial Statements in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
EARNINGS PERFORMANCE
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference between interest income (which includes
yield-related loan fees) and interest expense. Net interest income on a taxable
equivalent basis increased to $4.23 billion in third quarter 2003, from $3.72
billion in third quarter 2002, an increase of 14%.
Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis expressed as a percentage
of average total earning assets is referred to as the net interest margin,
which represents the average net effective yield on earning assets. The net
interest margin decreased to 5.03% in third quarter 2003 from 5.52% in third
quarter 2002. While loan growth had a positive impact on net interest income,
the net interest margin was impacted by the low interest rate environment
primarily because the new loans were made at yields below the existing
portfolio of loans.
35
AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS AND RATES PAID (TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT BASIS) (1) (2)
36
37
The pace of the decline in the margin slowed in third quarter 2003 from prior
quarters. While the margin stabilized somewhat toward the end of third
quarter 2003 and the strategic actions taken in third quarter 2003 may help
further stabilize the margin, the net interest margin may be impacted by a
variety of factors, primarily the mix of assets and liabilities, some of
which could benefit and some of which could adversely impact the margin.
Individual components of net interest income and the net interest margin are
presented in the rate/yield table on page 36.
Earning assets increased $66.3 billion in third quarter 2003 from the same
period last year due to an increase in average loans and mortgages held for
sale. Loans averaged $220.0 billion in third quarter 2003 compared with $181.8
billion in third quarter 2002. Average mortgages held for sale increased to
$69.8 billion in third quarter 2003 from $38.4 billion in third quarter 2002
and increased to $64.6 billion in the first nine months of 2003 from $34.0
billion in the first nine months of 2002. The increase for both periods was due
to increased originations including refinancing activity. Debt securities
available for sale averaged $27.8 billion in third quarter 2003 compared with
$34.9 billion in third quarter 2002.
An important contributor to the growth in net interest income from third
quarter 2002 was a 17% increase in core deposits, the Companys low-cost
source of funding. Average core deposits were $215.7 billion and $184.4
billion and funded 54.6% and 57.4% of the Companys average total assets in
third quarter 2003 and 2002, respectively. While savings certificates of
deposit declined on average from $23.8 billion in third quarter 2002 to $20.4
billion in third quarter 2003, noninterest-bearing checking accounts and
other core deposit categories increased on average from $160.6 billion in
third quarter 2002 to $195.3 billion in third quarter 2003 reflecting a
combination of growth in mortgage escrow deposits, resulting from higher
origination volume, and growth in primary account relationships. Total
average interest-bearing deposits increased to $165.3 billion in third
quarter 2003 from $134.1 billion a year ago. For the same periods, total
average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $83.7 billion from $63.4
billion.
38
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts increased 8% due to growth in primary
accounts and increased activity.
The Company earns trust, investment and IRA fees from managing and
administering assets, which include mutual funds, corporate trust, personal
trust, employee benefit trust and agency assets. At September 30, 2003 and
2002, these assets totaled approximately $544 billion and $492 billion,
respectively. Generally, these fees are based on the market value of the assets
that are managed, administered, or both. The increase in trust, investment and
IRA fees of 6% for third quarter 2003 compared with third quarter 2002 was
predominantly due to increased sales and customer relationships, the
acquisition of small asset portfolios and the beneficial impact of the strong
equity markets. Additionally, the Company receives commission and other fees
for providing services for retail and discount brokerage customers. At
September 30, 2003 and 2002, brokerage balances were approximately $75 billion
and $68 billion, respectively. Generally, these fees are based on the number of
transactions executed at the direction of the customer. The increase in
commissions and all other fees of 16% and 12% for the third quarter and first
nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2002 was
largely due to a higher number of brokerage transactions, the strong equity
markets and increased sales of commission-driven products.
39
Credit card fees increased 4% and 13% for the third quarter and first nine
months of 2003, respectively, due to an increase in credit card accounts and
credit and debit card transaction volume. In second quarter 2003, VISA USA Inc.
(VISA) reached an agreement to settle merchant litigation, which included
reducing some interchange fees to retailers. Absent any effort to increase
volume or reprice these transactions the settlement is expected to reduce fee
income by approximately $30 million per quarter. In October 2003, the Company
renewed its contract with VISA as its primary brand for debit and credit card
transactions and expanded its commitment to include VISAs Interlink network
for retail transactions with merchants.
Mortgage banking noninterest income was $773 million in the third quarter and
$1,877 million for the first nine months of 2003, an increase of 81% and 57%,
respectively, from the same periods of 2002. Origination and other closing
fees increased to $393 million and net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales
activities increased to $319 million in third quarter 2003, compared with third
quarter 2002. For the first nine months of 2003, origination and other closing
fees increased to $1,003 million and net gains on mortgage loan
origination/sales activities increased to $1,787 million. These increases were
primarily due to increased mortgage origination volume and gains on loan sales.
Originations for third quarter 2003 grew to $161 billion from $89 billion for
the same period of 2002. Mortgages held for sale increased to $55.3 billion at
September 30, 2003 from $51.2 billion at December 31, 2002 and $42.3 billion at
September 30, 2002.
Net servicing fees were a loss of $82 million and $1,266 million in the third
quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, and a loss of $158 million
and $279 million in the same periods of 2002. Servicing fees are presented
net of amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) and
gains and losses from hedge ineffectiveness, which are all influenced by both
the level and direction of mortgage interest rates. The reduction in
net losses from servicing fees from $158 million in third
quarter 2002 to $82 million in third quarter 2003 was due
to the growth in the servicing portfolio and the net impact of
changes in
interest rates. The increase in net losses from servicing fees in the
first nine months of 2003 compared with the same period of the prior
year was primarily due to lower average interest rates, which
resulted in higher MSR amortization. Gross servicing fees
increased in both the third quarter and first nine months of 2003 compared with
the same periods of the prior year due to the growth in the MSR portfolio
resulting from originations and purchases.
The Company recognized a direct write-down of MSRs of $492 million and $1,338
million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively,
compared with $887 million for third quarter 2002. See Financial Review -
Critical Accounting Policies Mortgage Servicing Rights Valuation in the
Companys 2002 Form 10-K for the method used to evaluate MSRs for impairment
and to determine if such impairment is other-than-temporary. Key assumptions,
including the sensitivity of those assumptions, used to determine the value of
MSRs are disclosed in Notes 1 and 21 (Securitizations) to Financial Statements
in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
Net gains (losses) from equity investments in the third quarter were $58
million and $(87) million for the first nine months of 2003, compared with
$(152) million and $(230) million
40
for the same periods of 2002. Of the $58
million gain in third quarter 2003, $48 million was due to the gain on the
public equity securities donated to the Wells Fargo Foundation.
The Company routinely reviews its investment portfolios for impairment. Such
write-downs are based primarily on issuer-specific factors and results. General
economic and market conditions, including industries in which venture capital
investments are made, and adverse changes impacting the availability of venture
capital financing are also taken into account. While the determination of
impairment is based on all of the information available at the time of the
assessment, new information or economic developments in the future could lead
to additional impairment.
Included in all other noninterest income for third quarter 2003 is a $125
million loss on the early retirement of $1.8 billion of term debt that was
previously issued at higher costs, which was predominantly offset by gains on
trading securities.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
The increase in noninterest expense, including increases in salaries, incentive
compensation and contract services, was partly due to the growth in the
mortgage and home equity businesses, which accounted for approximately 50% of
the increase from third quarter 2002.
In third quarter 2003 the Company took a number of strategic actions that
accounted for $233 million, or 23%, of the increase in third quarter 2003
expenses, compared with third quarter 2002. These strategic actions included
charges to equipment expense related to renegotiating certain vendor contracts, net occupancy expense related to consolidating
certain Company-
41
owned facilities and operations, and all other expense
related to the contribution of appreciated public equity securities to the
Wells Fargo Foundation.
INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for third quarter 2003 was 33.0%, compared with 35.5% in
the third quarter 2002, bringing the 2003 year-to-date effective tax rate down
to 34.6%, compared with 35.5% for the same period of 2002. This reduction for
the quarter and year-to-date compared with the same periods of a year ago was
primarily due to the tax benefit derived from the Companys third quarter 2003
donations of appreciated public equity securities to the Wells Fargo
Foundation.
OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS
Community Bankings
net income was $1,065 million in third quarter 2003,
compared with $1,073 million in third quarter 2002. Net income increased 4% to
$3,183 million for the first nine months of 2003 from $3,060 million for the
first nine months of 2002. The strategic actions taken in the third quarter
reduced Community Bankings third quarter 2003 net income by $170 million. Net
income in third quarter 2003 also reflected an increase in year-over-year
earnings of $108 million from residential home mortgages. Net interest income
increased to $3,056 million in third quarter 2003 from $2,664 million in third
quarter 2002, mostly due to growth in consumer loans, mortgages held for sale
and deposits, partially offset by net interest margin compression. Average
loans in Community Banking grew 28% and average core deposits grew 15% from
third quarter 2002. The provision for loan losses increased by $41 million for
third quarter 2003 due to growth in average loans. Noninterest income for third
quarter 2003 increased by $402 million over the same period in 2002 due to
increases in mortgage banking fees, consumer loan fees, deposit service charges
and credit card fees partially offset by strategic actions taken in the
quarter. Noninterest expense increased by $854 million in third quarter 2003
over the same period in 2002 due primarily to increased mortgage and home
equity originations. The strategic actions taken during the third quarter
accounted for $231 million, or 7%, of noninterest expense.
Wholesale Bankings
net income was $372 million in third quarter 2003, compared
with $285 million in third quarter 2002. Net income was $1,063 million for the
first nine months of 2003, compared with $933 million, before the effect of
change in accounting principle, in the first nine months of 2002, an increase
of 14%. The provision for loan losses decreased by $6 million to $54 million in
third quarter 2003 and by $64 million to $154 million for the first nine months
of 2003 due to lower net charge-offs. Noninterest income increased 38% to $707
million and 17% to $2,015 million in the third quarter and first nine months of
2003, respectively, from $512 million and $1,728 million in the same periods of
2002 primarily due to higher asset-based lending income, insurance brokerage,
commercial mortgage originations, investment income and fees and commissions.
Noninterest expense increased 12% to $629 million and 8% to $1,885 million in
the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, from $564
million and $1,747 million in the same periods of 2002, largely due to higher
personnel expense resulting from increased benefit costs and full-time
employees and higher minority interest expense in partnership earnings within
asset based lending.
42
Wells Fargo Financials
net income was $121 million in third quarter 2003
compared with $92 million for the same period in 2002, an increase of 32%. Net
income was $332 million for the first nine months of 2003 and $251 million,
before the effect of change in accounting principle, for the same period in
2002. Net interest income increased 26% to $599 million for third quarter 2003
from $477 million for third quarter 2002 due to lower funding rates combined
with growth in average loans. Average loans grew 36% to $21.2 billion at
September 30, 2003. Net interest income increased 22% for the first nine months
of 2003 compared with the same period in 2002. The provision for loan losses
increased by $4 million and $19 million in the third quarter and first nine
months of 2003, respectively. Noninterest expense was $343 million and $268
million for the quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, an
increase of 28%, and $973 million and $810 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, an increase of 20%. The increase was
primarily due to increases in full-time equivalent employees and salaries and
incentive compensation resulting from increases in loan volume and an
acquisition.
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The following table provides the cost and fair value for the major components
of securities available for sale carried at fair value. There were no
securities classified as held to maturity at the end of the periods presented.
43
The following table provides the components of the estimated unrealized net
gains on securities available for sale. The estimated unrealized net gains on
securities available for sale are reported on an after-tax basis as a component
of cumulative other comprehensive income.
The following table provides the components of the total realized net gains on
the sales of securities from the securities available for sale portfolio,
including those related to marketable equity securities.
The weighted average expected remaining maturity of the debt securities portion
of the securities available for sale portfolio was 6 years at September 30,
2003. Remaining maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
mortgage debt issuers have the right to prepay obligation prior to contractual
maturity.
The estimated effect of a 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest
rates on the fair value and the expected remaining maturity of the
mortgage-backed securities available for sale portfolio is indicated below.
44
LOAN PORTFOLIO
45
NONACCRUAL LOANS AND OTHER ASSETS
The table below presents comparative data for nonaccrual loans and other
assets. A loan is placed on nonaccrual status (a) upon becoming 90 days past
due as to interest or principal (unless both well-secured and in the process of
collection), (b) when the full timely collection of interest or principal
becomes uncertain or (c) when a portion of the principal balance has been
charged off. Real estate 1-4 family loans (first and junior liens) are placed
on nonaccrual status within 120 days of becoming past due as to interest or
principal, regardless of security. Managements classification of a loan as
nonaccrual does not necessarily indicate that the principal of the loan is
uncollectible in whole or in part. The table below excludes certain loans that
are 90 days or more past due and still accruing that are presented in the table
on page 47.
The Company generally identifies loans to be evaluated for impairment when such
loans are over $1 million and on nonaccrual. However, not all nonaccrual loans
are impaired. Loans are considered impaired when it is probable that the
Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual
terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. See Note 1
to Financial Statements in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K for further discussion
of impaired loans.
46
The table below shows the recorded investment in impaired loans and the method
used to measure impairment for the periods presented:
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $696 million and $682
million during third quarter 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $676 million and
$733 million during the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Predominantly all payments received on impaired loans are recorded using the
cost recovery method. Under the cost recovery method, all payments received are
applied to principal. This method is used when the ultimate collectibility of
the total principal is in doubt. For payments received on impaired loans
recorded using the cash basis method, total interest income recognized for the
third quarter and first nine months of 2003 was $3 million and $8 million,
respectively, and $5 million and $12 million during the same periods of 2002.
Under the cash method, contractual interest is credited to interest income when
received. This method is used when the ultimate collectibility of the total
principal is not in doubt.
Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing
The following table shows loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to
interest or principal, but still accruing. All loans in this category are (a)
both well-secured and in the process of collection or (b) real estate 1-4
family first mortgage loans or consumer loans that are exempt under regulatory
rules from being classified as nonaccrual. Real estate 1-4 family loans (first
and junior liens) are placed on nonaccrual within 120 days of becoming past due
and are excluded from the following table.
47
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Company considers the allowance for loan losses of $3.89 billion adequate
to cover probable losses inherent in loans, loan commitments and standby and
other letters of credit at September 30, 2003. The Companys determination of
the level of the allowance for loan losses rests upon various judgments and
assumptions, including (1) general economic conditions, (2) loan portfolio
composition, (3) prior loan loss experience, (4) the evaluation of credit risk
related to both individual borrowers and pools of homogenous loans, (5)
periodic use of sensitivity analysis and expected loss simulation modeling and
(6) the Companys ongoing examination process and that of its regulators. The
allowance for loan losses consists of a component for
48
individual loan impairment and multiple components of collective loan
impairment. The Company considers relevant observable data in the recognition
and measurement of the components of collective loan impairment.
OTHER ASSETS
Trading assets consist largely of securities, including corporate debt, U.S.
government agency obligations, and the fair value of derivative instruments
held for customer accommodation purposes. Interest income from trading assets
was $37 million and $43 million in third quarter 2003 and 2002, respectively,
and $109 million and $135 million in the first nine months of 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Noninterest income from trading assets was $104 million and $10
million in third quarter 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $346 million and $212
million in the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and is
included in the all other category of noninterest income.
Net gains (losses) from nonmarketable equity investments were $26 million and
$(103) million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2003,
respectively, compared with $(68) million and $(112) million for the same
periods of 2002. Net gains (losses) from nonmarketable investments included net
gains (losses) from private equity investments of $8 million and $(107) million
for the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared
with $(72) million and $(144) million for the same periods of 2002.
GNMA pool buy-outs are advances made to GNMA mortgage pools that are insured by
the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA). These advances are made to buy out delinquent loans
under the Companys servicing agreements. The Company undertakes the collection
and foreclosure process for the FHA and VA. After the foreclosure process is
complete, the Company is reimbursed for substantially all costs incurred,
including the advances.
49
DEPOSITS
The following table shows comparative detail of deposits.
The increase in other time deposits was predominantly due to an increase in
certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 sold to institutional customers.
50
REGULATORY AND AGENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company and each of the subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory
capital adequacy requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board and the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Risk-based capital (RBC) guidelines
establish a risk-adjusted ratio relating capital to different categories of
assets and off-balance sheet exposures.
As an approved seller/servicer, one of the
Companys mortgage banking subsidiaries is required to
maintain minimum levels of shareholders equity, as specified by various
agencies, including the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Government National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association. This mortgage
banking subsidiarys equity at September 30, 2003 was below the required levels.
The subsidiary received a capital infusion from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in
October 2003 to restore its equity to the required levels.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the ordinary course of business, the Company engages in financial
transactions, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), that are not recorded on the Companys balance sheet or may be recorded
on the Companys balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full
contract or notional amount of the transaction. (See Note 1 to Financial
Statements for the Companys accounting policy relating to consolidation.) Such
transactions are structured to meet the financial needs of customers, manage
the Companys credit, market or liquidity risks, diversify funding sources or
optimize capital.
51
Off-balance sheet arrangements include (1) securitization activities in the
ordinary course of business, including mortgage loans and other financial
assets (student loans, commercial mortgages and automobile receivables), (2)
investment vehicles, typically in the form of certain collateralized debt
obligations and (3) unconsolidated joint ventures, used to support origination
activities of the Companys mortgage banking affiliate or formed with third
parties for economies of scale.
In the ordinary course of operations, the Company enters into certain
contractual obligations. Such obligations include (1) the acceptance of
deposits, (2) the funding of operations through debt issuances, (3) leases for
premises and equipment, (4) purchase obligations and (5) certain derivative
instrument contracts.
For additional information on off-balance sheet arrangements and other
contractual obligations see Note 9 (Guarantees) to Financial Statements and
Financial Review Overview Recent Accounting Standards in this report and
Financial Review Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Contractual
Obligations in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
ASSET/LIABILITY AND MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Asset/liability management consists of the evaluation, monitoring, and
management of the Companys interest rate risk, market risk and liquidity and
funding. The Corporate Asset/Liability Management Committee (Corporate ALCO)
maintains oversight of these risks. The Committee consists of senior financial
and senior business executives. Each of the Companys principal business groups
- Community Banking (including Mortgage Banking) and Wholesale Banking have
individual asset/liability management committees and processes that are linked
to the Corporate ALCO process.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Interest rate risk, one of the more prominent risks in terms of potential
earnings impact, is an inevitable part of being a financial intermediary. For
more information, see Financial Review Asset/Liability and Market Risk
Management Interest Rate Risk in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K. The principal
tool used to evaluate the Companys interest rate risk is a simulation of net
income under various economic and interest rate scenarios.
The Company assesses its interest rate risk by comparing its most likely
earnings to various earnings simulations
performed under multiple interest rate scenarios that differ in the direction
of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change
and the projected shape of the yield curve. As of September 30,
2003, the Companys simulated earnings at risk to a higher
interest rate scenario were 3.7% of its estimated most
likely earnings. The higher interest rate scenario assumed that the
Federal Funds rate would increase to 4.75% by the end of 2004,
and that the 10 year Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT) bond yield would reach a
rate of 6.50%. Simulation estimates are highly dependent on and will change
with the size and mix of the Companys actual and projected balance sheet at
the time each simulation is done.
52
The Company uses exchange-traded and over-the-counter interest rate derivatives
to hedge certain of its interest rate exposures. The credit risk amount and
estimated net fair values of these derivatives as of September 30, 2003 and
December 31, 2002 are indicated in Note 10 to Financial Statements. Derivatives
are used for asset/liability management in three ways: (a) a major portion of
the Companys long-term fixed-rate debt is converted to floating-rate payments
by entering into received-fixed swaps at issuance; (b) the cash flows from
selected asset and/or liability instruments/portfolios are converted from fixed
to floating payments or vice versa; and (c) the Companys mortgage operation
actively uses swaptions, futures, forwards and rate options to hedge interest
rate lock commitments, mortgages held for sale and mortgage servicing rights.
MORTGAGE BANKING INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company originates, funds and services mortgage loans. These activities
subject the Company to a number of risks, including credit, liquidity and
interest rate risks. The Company manages credit and liquidity risk by selling
or securitizing most of the loans it originates. Changes in interest rates,
however, may have a potentially large impact on mortgage banking income in any
calendar quarter and over time. The Company manages both the risk to net income
over time from all sources as well as the risk to an immediate reduction in the
fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. The Company relies on mortgage
loans held on its balance sheet and derivative instruments to maintain these
risks within Corporate ALCO parameters.
At September 30, 2003, the Company had mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) of $5.8
billion, net of a valuation allowance of $1.8 billion. The Companys MSRs were
valued at 1.03% of mortgage loans serviced for others at September 30, 2003, up
from .92% at December 31, 2002 and .89% at September 30, 2002. The increase in
MSRs was predominantly due to the growth in the servicing portfolio resulting
from originations and purchases.
The value of the MSRs is influenced by prepayment speed assumptions affecting
the duration of the mortgage loans to which the MSRs relate. Changes in
long-term interest rates affect these prepayment speed assumptions. For
example, a decrease in long-term rates would accelerate prepayment speed
assumptions as borrowers refinance their existing mortgage loans and decrease
the value of the MSRs. In contrast, prepayment speed assumptions would tend to
slow in a rising interest rate environment and increase the value of the MSRs.
The Company mitigates mortgage banking interest rate risk in two ways. First, a
significant portion of the MSRs are hedged against a change in interest rates
with derivative contracts. The principal source of risk in this hedging process
is the risk that changes in the value of the hedging contracts may not match
changes in the value of the hedged portion of the MSRs for any given change in
long-term interest rates.
Second, a portion of the potential reduction in the value of the MSRs for a
given decline in interest rates is offset by estimated increases in origination
and servicing fees over time from new mortgage activity or refinancing
associated with that decline in interest rates. In a scenario of much lower
long-term interest rates, the decline in the value of the MSRs and its impact
on net income would be immediate whereas the additional fee income accrues over
time. Under
53
GAAP, impairment of the MSRs, due to a decrease in long-term rates or other
reasons, is reflected as a charge to earnings through an increase to the
valuation allowance.
In scenarios of sustained increases in long-term interest rates, origination
fees may eventually decline as refinancing activity slows. In such higher
interest rate scenarios the duration of the servicing portfolio may extend. In
such circumstances, periodic amortization of servicing costs may be reduced,
and some or all of the valuation allowance may be released.
MARKET RISK TRADING ACTIVITIES
The Company incurs interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, equity price risk
and commodity price risk in several trading businesses managed under limits set
by Corporate ALCO. The primary purpose of these businesses is to accommodate
customers in the management of their market price risks. Additionally, the
Company takes positions based on market expectations or to benefit from price
differentials between financial instruments and markets. All securities, loans,
foreign exchange transactions, commodity transactions and derivatives
transacted with customers or used to hedge capital market transactions done
with customers are carried at fair value. Counterparty risk limits are
established and monitored by the Institutional Risk Committee. Open, at risk
positions for all trading business are monitored by Corporate ALCO.
MARKET RISK EQUITY MARKETS
Equity markets impact the Company in both direct and indirect ways. For more
information, see Financial Review Asset/Liability and Market Risk Management
- Market Risk Equity Markets in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K. The Company
makes and manages direct equity investments in start up businesses, emerging
growth companies, management buy-outs, acquisitions and corporate
recapitalizations. The Company also invests in non-affiliated funds that make
similar private equity investments. These private equity investments are made
within capital allocations approved by the Companys management or its Board of
Directors. Management reviews these investments at least quarterly and assesses
them for possible other-than-temporary impairment. At September 30, 2003,
private equity investments totaled $1,713 million, compared with $1,657 million
at December 31, 2002.
The Company has marketable equity securities in its securities available for
sale investment portfolio, including shares distributed from the Companys
venture capital activities. These securities are managed within capital risk
limits approved by management. Gains and losses on these securities are
recognized in net income when realized and, in addition, other-than-temporary
impairment may be periodically recorded. At September 30, 2003, the fair value
of marketable equity securities was $455 million and cost was $333 million,
compared with $556 million and $598 million, respectively, at December 31,
2002.
54
LIQUIDITY AND FUNDING
The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Company
can efficiently meet customer loan requests, customer deposit
maturities/withdrawals and other cash commitments under both normal operating
conditions and under unforeseen and unpredictable circumstances of industry or
market stress. To achieve this objective, Corporate ALCO establishes and
monitors liquidity guidelines that require sufficient asset-based liquidity to
cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile,
less reliable funding markets. To ensure that the Parent is a source of
strength for its regulated, deposit-taking subsidiary banks, the Company sets
liquidity management guidelines for both the consolidated and Parent balance
sheets.
In addition to the immediately liquid resources of cash and due from banks and
federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements, asset
liquidity is provided by the debt securities in the securities available for
sale portfolio. Asset liquidity is further enhanced by the Companys ability to
sell or securitize loans in secondary markets.
Core customer deposits have historically provided the Company with a sizeable
source of relatively stable and low-cost funds.
The remaining funding of assets is mostly provided by long-term debt, deposits
in foreign offices, short-term borrowings (federal funds purchased and
securities sold under repurchase agreements, commercial paper and other
short-term borrowings) and trust preferred securities. Liquidity for the
Company is also available through the Companys ability to raise funds in a
variety of domestic and international money and capital markets. The Company
accesses the capital markets for long-term funding through the issuance of
registered debt, private placements and asset-based secured funding. In
September 2003, Moodys Investors Service raised Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.s
rating to Aaa, its highest investment grade, from Aa1 and raised the
Companys senior debt rating to Aa1 from Aa2. The rating agencies base
their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital
adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, level and quality of
earnings. In October 2003, Standard & Poors Ratings Service raised the
counterparty ratings on the Company to AA-minus/A-1-plus from A-plus/A-1
and the revised outlook for the Company to stable from positive.
Parent
. The Parent has registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) to issue a variety of securities, including senior and subordinated notes
and preferred and common securities to be issued by one or more trusts that are
directly or indirectly owned by the Company and consolidated in the financial
statements. In March 2003, the Parent registered for issuance an additional
$15.3 billion in senior and subordinated notes and preferred and common
securities. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, the Parent
issued $3.5 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, of senior notes. Also,
during third quarter 2003, Wells Fargo Capital VIII issued a total of $200
million of trust preferred securities. At September 30, 2003, the Parents
remaining issuance capacity under effective registration statements was $11.1
billion. In October 2003, the Parent issued $1.0 billion in senior and
subordinated notes. The Company used the proceeds from securities issued in the
first nine months of 2003 for general corporate purposes and expects that it
will use the proceeds from the future issuance of any securities for
55
general corporate purposes as well. The Parent also issues commercial paper and
has two back-up credit facilities amounting to $2 billion.
On April 15, 2003, the Company issued $3 billion of convertible senior
debentures as a private placement. As described in Item 2 of Part II of the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,
the convertible debentures are convertible into shares of the Companys common
stock under certain circumstances. While the Company has the ability to settle
the entire amount of the conversion rights granted in this convertible debt
offering in cash, common stock or a combination, the Company intends to settle
the principal amount in cash and to settle the conversion spread (the excess
conversion value over the principal) in either cash or stock. The Company can
also redeem all or some of the convertible debt securities for cash at any time
on or after May 5, 2008, at their principal amount plus accrued interest, if
any.
Bank Note Program
. In March 2003, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. established a $50
billion bank note program under which it may issue up to $20 billion in
short-term senior notes outstanding at any time and up to a total of $30
billion in long-term senior and subordinated notes. This program updates and
supercedes the bank note program established in February 2001. Securities are
issued under this program as private placements in accordance with the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currencys regulations. During the third quarter and
first nine months of 2003, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. issued $555 million and $9.2
billion, respectively, in senior long-term notes. At September 30, 2003, the
remaining issuance authority under the long-term portion was $15.1 billion. In
October 2003, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. issued $105 million in senior bank notes.
Wells Fargo Financial
. During third quarter 2003, Wells Fargo Financial, Inc.
issued as private placements $500 million and $400 million (Canadian) in senior
notes. During the first nine months of 2003, Wells Fargo Financial Canada
Corporation issued $400 million (Canadian) in senior notes, leaving at
September 30, 2003 a total of $550 million (Canadian) available for issuance.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Company has an active program for managing stockholder capital. The
objective of effective capital management is to produce above market long-term
returns by opportunistically using capital when returns are perceived to be
high and issuing/accumulating capital when costs are perceived to be low.
The Company uses capital to fund organic growth, acquire banks and other
financial services companies, pay dividends and repurchase its shares. During
the first nine months of 2003, the Companys consolidated assets increased by
$42 billion, or 12%. During 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to 50 million additional shares of the Companys outstanding
common stock. During the first nine months of 2003, the Company repurchased
approximately 27 million shares of its common stock for a total of $1.3
billion. At September 30, 2003, the total remaining common stock repurchase
authority was approximately 31 million shares. In July 2003, the Board of
Directors approved an increase in the Companys quarterly common stock dividend
to 45 cents per share from 30 cents per share, representing a 50% increase in
the quarterly dividend.
56
The Companys potential sources of capital include retained earnings, issuance
of common and preferred stock and issuance of subordinated debt and trust
preferred securities. In the first nine months of 2003, retained earnings
increased $2.7 billion, predominantly as a result of net income of $4.6 billion
less dividends of $1.8 billion. In the first nine months of 2003, the Company
issued a total of $779 million in common stock for various employee stock
plans, which included $192 million related to the conversion of preferred stock
to common stock under the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. On October 13, 2003,
the Company called all shares of its Adjustable-Rate Cumulative, Series B
preferred stock. The shares will be redeemed on November 15, 2003 at the stated
liquidation price plus accrued dividends.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
We make forward-looking statements in this report and in other reports and
proxy statements we file with the SEC. In addition, our senior management might
make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media and
others. You should consider forward-looking statements in light of the
following discussion.
Broadly speaking, forward-looking statements include:
In this report, for example, we make forward-looking statements discussing our
expectations about:
Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts.
Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements
often include words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect,
intend, plan, project, target, can, could, may, should, will,
would or similar expressions. Do not unduly rely on forward-looking
statements. They give our expectations about the future and are not guarantees.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we
might not update them to reflect changes that occur after the date they are
made.
57
There are several factorsmany beyond our controlthat could cause results to
differ significantly from our expectations. We describe some of these factors
below. We describe other factors, such as credit, market, operational,
liquidity, interest rate and other risks, elsewhere in this report (see, for
example, Balance Sheet Analysis). We describe factors relating to the
regulation and supervision of the Company in our 2002 Form 10-K. Any factor
described in this report or in our 2002 Form 10-K could by itself, or together
with one or more other factors, adversely affect our business, results of
operations and/or financial condition. There are factors not described in this
report or in our 2002 Form 10-K that could cause results to differ from our
expectations.
Industry Factors
As a financial services company, our earnings are significantly affected by
general business and economic conditions.
Our business and earnings are impacted by general business and economic
conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term
and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both
debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the U.S. economy and the
local economies in which we operate. For example, an economic downturn,
increase in unemployment, or other events that negatively impact household
and/or corporate incomes could decrease the demand for the Companys loan and
non-loan products and services and increase the number of customers who fail to
pay interest or principal on their loans.
Geopolitical conditions can also impact our earnings. Acts or threats of
terrorism, actions taken by the U.S. or other governments in response to acts
or threats of terrorism and/or military conflicts including the aftermath of
the war with Iraq, could impact business and economic conditions in the U.S.
and abroad. The terrorist attacks in 2001, for example, caused an immediate
decrease in demand for air travel, which adversely affected not only the
airline industry but also other travel-related and leisure industries, such as
lodging, gaming and tourism.
We discuss other business and economic conditions in more detail elsewhere in
this report.
Our earnings are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies
of the federal government and its agencies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of
money and credit in the United States. Its policies determine in large part our
cost of funds for lending and investing and the return we earn on those loans
and investments, both of which impact our net interest margin, and can
materially affect the value of financial instruments we hold, such as debt
securities and mortgage servicing rights. Its policies also can affect our
borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their
loans. Changes in Federal Reserve Board policies are beyond our control and
hard to predict or anticipate.
The financial services industry is highly competitive.
We operate in a highly competitive industry which could become even more
competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes
and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and insurance companies
can now merge by creating a new type of financial services company called a
financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial
service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and
58
underwriting) and merchant banking. Recently, a number of foreign banks have
acquired financial services companies in the United States, further increasing
competition in the U.S. market. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry
and made it possible for nonbanks to offer products and services traditionally
provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems.
Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower
cost structures.
We are heavily regulated by federal and state agencies.
The holding company, its subsidiary banks and many of its nonbank subsidiaries
are heavily regulated at the federal and state levels. This regulation is to
protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a
whole, not security holders. Congress and state legislatures and federal and
state regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and
policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory
policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes,
regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways
including limiting the types of financial services and products we may offer
and/or increasing the ability of nonbanks to offer competing financial services
and products. Also, our failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies
could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies and damage to our reputation.
For more information, refer to the Regulation and Supervision section and to
Notes 3 (Cash, Loan and Dividend Restrictions) and 25 (Regulatory and Agency
Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
Future legislation could change our competitive position.
Various legislation, including proposals to substantially change the financial
institution regulatory system and to expand or contract the powers of banking
institutions and bank holding companies, is from time to time introduced in the
Congress. This legislation may change banking statutes and the operating
environment of the Company and its subsidiaries in substantial and
unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the
cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the
competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other
financial institutions. We cannot predict whether any of this potential
legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it, or any
implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and
counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with
customers and counterparties, we may rely on information furnished to us by or
on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements and
other financial information. We also may rely on representations of customers
and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and,
with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For
example, in deciding whether to extend credit, we may assume that a customers
audited financial statements conform with GAAP and present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the customer. We also may rely on the audit report covering those
financial statements. Our financial condition and results of operations
59
could be negatively impacted to the extent we rely on financial statements that
do not comply with GAAP or that are materially misleading.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial
transactions that historically have involved banks. For example, consumers can
now pay bills and transfer funds directly without banks. The process of
eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as disintermediation, could result
in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and income
generated from those deposits.
Company Factors
Maintaining or increasing our market share depends on market acceptance and
regulatory approval of new products and services.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services
to evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure on financial
services companies to provide products and services at lower prices. This can
reduce our net interest margin and revenues from our fee-based products and
services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including
internet-based services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to
modify or adapt our existing products and services. We might not successfully
introduce new products and services, achieve market acceptance of our products
and services, and/or develop and maintain loyal customers.
Negative public opinion could damage our reputation and adversely impact our
earnings.
Reputation risk, or the risk to our earnings and capital from negative public
opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion can result from
our actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending
practices, corporate governance and acquisitions, and from actions taken by
government regulators and community organizations in response to those
activities. Negative public opinion can adversely affect our ability to keep
and attract customers and can expose us to litigation and regulatory action.
Because virtually all our businesses operate under the Wells Fargo brand,
actual or alleged conduct by one business can result in negative public opinion
about other Wells Fargo businesses. Although we take steps to minimize
reputation risk in dealing with our customers and communities, as a large
diversified financial services company with a relatively high industry profile,
the risk will always be present in our organization.
The holding company relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for most of its
revenue.
The holding company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its
subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from
its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay
dividends on the holding companys common and preferred stock and interest and
principal on its debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations limit
the amount of dividends that our bank and certain of our nonbank subsidiaries
may pay to the holding company. Also, the holding companys right to
participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiarys liquidation or
reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiarys
60
creditors. For more information, refer to Regulation and SupervisionDividend
Restrictions and Holding Company Structure in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
Our accounting policies and methods are key to how we report our financial
condition and results of operations, and they may require management to make
estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report
our financial condition and results of operations. Our management must exercise
judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and
methods so that not only do they comply with generally accepted accounting
principles but also that they reflect managements judgment as to the most
appropriate manner in which to record and report our financial condition and
results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting
policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be
reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in our reporting materially
different amounts than would have been reported under a different alternative.
Note 1 to Financial Statements and Financial Review Critical Accounting
Policies in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K describes our significant accounting
policies.
We have businesses other than banking.
We are a diversified financial services company. In addition to banking, we
provide insurance, investments, mortgages and consumer finance. Although we
believe our diversity helps mitigate the impact to the Company when downturns
affect any one segment of our industry, it also means that our earnings could
be subject to different risks and uncertainties. We discuss some examples
below.
Merchant Banking
. Our merchant banking activities include venture capital
investments, which have a much greater risk of capital losses than our
traditional banking activities. Also, it is difficult to predict the timing of
any gains from these activities. Realization of gains from our venture capital
investments depends on a number of factorsmany beyond our controlincluding
general economic conditions, the prospects of the companies in which we invest,
when these companies go public, the size of our position relative to the public
float, and whether we are subject to any resale restrictions. Factors such as a
slowdown in consumer demand or a deterioration in capital spending on
technology and telecommunications equipment, could result in declines in the
values of our publicly-traded and private equity securities. If we determine
that the declines are other-than-temporary, additional impairment charges would
be recognized. Also, we will realize losses to the extent we sell securities at
less than book value. For more information, see in this report Balance Sheet
AnalysisSecurities Available for Sale.
Mortgage Banking
. The impact of interest rates on our mortgage banking business
can be large and complex. Changes in interest rates can impact loan origination
fees and loan servicing fees, which account for a significant portion of
mortgage-related revenues. A decline in mortgage rates generally increases the
demand for mortgage loans as borrowers refinance, but also generally leads to
accelerated payoffs in our mortgage servicing portfolio. Conversely, in a
constant or increasing rate environment, we would expect fewer loans to be
refinanced and a decline in payoffs in our servicing portfolio. Although the
Company uses dynamic and sophisticated models to assess the impact of interest
rates on mortgage fees, amortization of mortgage servicing rights, and the
value of mortgage servicing assets, the estimates of net income and fair value
produced by these models are
61
dependent on estimates and assumptions of future loan demand, prepayment speeds
and other factors which may overstate or understate actual subsequent
experience. In addition, although the Company uses derivative instruments to
hedge the value of its servicing portfolio, the hedges do not cover the full
value of the portfolio and the Company can provide no assurances that the
hedges will be effective to offset significant decreases in the value of the
portfolio. For more information, see Financial ReviewCritical Accounting
PoliciesMortgage Servicing Rights Valuation and Risk ManagementAsset
/Liability and Market Risk Management in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business
infrastructure.
Third parties provide key components of our business infrastructure such as
internet connections and network access. Any disruption in internet, network
access or other voice or data communication services provided by these third
parties or any failure of these third parties to handle current or higher
volumes of use could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and
services to our customers and otherwise to conduct our business. Technological
or financial difficulties of a third party service provider could adversely
affect our business to the extent those difficulties result in the interruption
or discontinuation of services provided by that party.
We have an active acquisition program.
We regularly explore opportunities to acquire financial institutions and other
financial services providers. We cannot predict the number, size or timing of
future acquisitions. We typically do not comment publicly on a possible
acquisition or business combination until we have signed a definitive agreement
for the transaction.
Our ability to successfully complete an acquisition generally is subject to
regulatory approval, and we cannot be certain when or if, or on what terms and
conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. We might be
required to divest banks or branches as a condition to receiving regulatory
approval.
Difficulty in integrating an acquired company may cause us not to realize
expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product
presence, and/or other projected benefits from the acquisition. Specifically,
the integration process could result in higher than expected deposit attrition
(run-off), loss of key employees, the disruption of our business or the
business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to
maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition. Also, the negative impact of any divestitures
required by regulatory authorities in connection with acquisitions or business
combinations may be greater than expected.
Legislative Risk
Our business model is dependent on sharing information between the family of
companies owned by Wells Fargo to better satisfy our customers needs. Laws
that restrict the ability of our companies to share information about customers
could negatively impact our revenue and profit.
62
Our business could suffer if we fail to attract and retain skilled people.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain key
people. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by the
Company can be intense. We may not be able to hire people or to keep them.
Our stock price can be volatile.
Our stock price can fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors including:
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and
political conditions and events, such as the recent terrorist attacks, economic
slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, credit loss trends or currency
fluctuations, also could cause our stock price to decrease regardless of our
operating results.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by SEC rules, the Companys management evaluated the effectiveness,
as of September 30, 2003, of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures.
The Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer participated
in the evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the Companys chief executive
officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2003.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
No change occurred during the third quarter of 2003 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
63
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Cumulative
Unearned
Additional
other
Total
Number of
Preferred
ESOP
Common
paid-in
Retained
Treasury
comprehensive
stockholders'
(in millions, except shares)
shares
stock
shares
stock
capital
earnings
stock
income
equity
$
218
$
(154
)
$
2,894
$
9,436
$
16,005
$
(1,937
)
$
752
$
27,214
3,968
3,968
514
514
(196
)
(196
)
4,286
12,884,012
41
(130
)
570
481
12,017,193
4
531
535
25,217,058
(1,206
)
(1,206
)
239
(256
)
17
174
(11
)
163
3,301,318
(163
)
12
151
(3
)
(3
)
(1,399
)
(1,399
)
3
3
76
(82
)
63
2,436
49
318
2,860
$
294
$
(236
)
$
2,894
$
9,499
$
18,441
$
(1,888
)
$
1,070
$
30,074
$
251
$
(190
)
$
2,894
$
9,498
$
19,394
$
(2,465
)
$
976
$
30,358
4,578
4,578
20
20
(77
)
(77
)
(347
)
(347
)
4,174
14,383,099
22
(102
)
667
587
129,475
6
6
27,327,815
(1,289
)
(1,289
)
260
(279
)
19
--
206
(14
)
192
3,975,708
(192
)
7
185
--
(3
)
(3
)
(1,764
)
(1,764
)
111
111
68
(73
)
34
2,709
(320
)
(404
)
2,014
$
319
$
(263
)
$
2,894
$
9,532
$
22,103
$
(2,785
)
$
572
$
32,372
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Nine months ended September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
$
4,578
$
3,968
1,283
1,295
974
1,522
2,975
2,510
(36
)
(116
)
(1,787
)
(519
)
(23
)
(15
)
10
26
(27
)
6
192
163
(112
)
(1,598
)
718
155
(70
)
49
(12
)
36
(335,507
)
(190,320
)
329,484
176,988
2,632
1,257
(645
)
(777
)
(1,669
)
(3,958
)
295
2,922
3,253
(6,406
)
6,057
14,566
10,225
6,496
(19,117
)
(11,459
)
(816
)
(574
)
(17,972
)
(8,129
)
1,259
877
(13,468
)
(1,950
)
13,754
8,441
(15,410
)
(10,610
)
(3,682
)
30
42
206
339
482
(1,348
)
(3,601
)
(358
)
(75
)
(4,272
)
(42,128
)
(7,939
)
34,520
13,890
(7,857
)
(8,300
)
25,677
16,792
(14,688
)
(7,492
)
700
450
544
412
(1,289
)
(1,206
)
(1,767
)
(1,402
)
638
46
36,478
13,190
(2,397
)
(1,155
)
17,820
16,968
$
15,423
$
15,813
$
2,586
$
3,053
2,429
1,881
$
375
$
352
282
224
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Quarter ended Sept. 30
,
Nine months ended Sept. 30
,
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2003
2002
2003
2002
Net income, as reported
$
1,561
$
1,444
$
4,578
$
3,968
Add:
Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported net
income, net of tax
1
1
2
3
Less:
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense under the fair
value method for all awards, net of tax
47
49
150
145
Net income, pro forma
$
1,515
$
1,396
$
4,430
$
3,826
Earnings per common share
As reported
$
.93
$
.85
$
2.73
$
2.33
Pro forma
.90
.82
2.64
2.24
Diluted earnings per common share
As reported
$
.92
$
.84
$
2.70
$
2.30
Pro forma
.89
.81
2.61
2.21
Table of Contents
(in millions)
Date
Assets
Certain assets of Telmark, LLC, Syracuse, New York
February 28
$
660
Other (1)
Various
112
$
772
(1)
Consists of 11 acquisitions of asset management, commercial real estate
brokerage, bankruptcy administration and insurance brokerage businesses.
Table of Contents
September 30, 2003
September 30, 2002
Gross
Accumulated
Gross
Accumulated
(in millions)
carrying amount
amortization
carrying amount
amortization
$
14,756
$
7,167
$
10,342
$
4,168
2,415
1,654
2,415
1,510
387
273
373
249
$
17,558
$
9,094
$
13,130
$
5,927
$
14
$
14
(1)
The valuation allowance was $1,824 million at September 30, 2003 and
$1,759 million at September 30, 2002. The carrying value of mortgage
servicing rights was $5,765 million at September 30, 2003 and $4,415
million at September 30, 2002. See Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities)
for further information.
Mortgage
Core
servicing
deposit
(in millions)
rights
intangibles
Other
Total
$
2,301
$
107
$
22
$
2,430
$
499
$
34
$
7
$
540
$
1,601
$
131
$
23
$
1,755
1,091
120
16
1,227
838
108
13
959
679
99
12
790
549
91
11
651
Table of Contents
Community
Wholesale
Wells Fargo
Consolidated
(in millions)
Banking
Banking
Financial
Company
$
6,139
$
2,781
$
607
$
9,527
627
18
6
651
(133
)
(271
)
(404
)
(30
)
(30
)
$
6,736
$
2,666
$
342
$
9,744
$
6,743
$
2,667
$
343
$
9,753
31
60
91
5
5
$
6,774
$
2,727
$
348
$
9,849
Community
Wholesale
Wells Fargo
Consolidated
(in millions)
Banking
Banking
Financial
Enterprise
Company
$
2,889
$
716
$
342
$
5,797
$
9,744
$
2,927
$
777
$
348
$
5,797
$
9,849
Table of Contents
Shares issued and outstanding
Carrying amount (in millions)
Adjustable
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
dividends rate
2003
2002
2002
2003
2002
2002
Minimum
Maximum
1,460,000
1,460,000
1,460,000
$
73
$
73
$
73
5.50
%
10.50
%
85,324
85
8.50
9.50
56,741
64,049
85,727
57
64
86
10.50
11.50
42,606
46,126
56,826
43
46
57
10.50
11.50
32,092
34,742
38,242
32
35
38
11.50
12.50
12,532
13,222
14,722
13
13
14
10.30
11.30
4,875
5,095
5,745
5
5
6
10.75
11.75
5,481
5,876
7,076
5
6
7
9.50
10.50
4,327
5,407
6,907
4
6
7
8.50
9.50
2,008
3,043
4,743
2
3
5
10.00
10.00
612
1
9.00
9.00
(263
)
(190
)
(236
)
1,705,986
1,637,560
1,680,600
$
56
$
61
$
58
(1)
Liquidation preference $50. On October 13, 2003, the Company called all
of the shares. The shares will be redeemed on November 15, 2003 at the
stated liquidation price plus accrued dividends.
(2)
Liquidation preference $1,000.
(3)
In accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 93-6,
Employers Accounting for
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
, the Company recorded a corresponding
charge to unearned ESOP shares in connection with the issuance of the
ESOP Preferred Stock. The unearned ESOP shares are reduced as shares of
the ESOP Preferred Stock are committed to be released.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
(income/expense in millions,
Community
Wholesale
Wells Fargo
Reconciliation
Consolidated
average balances in billions)
Banking
Banking
Financial
column (3)
Company
Quarter ended September 30,
2003
2002
2003
2002
2003
2002
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
3,056
$
2,664
$
556
$
556
$
599
$
477
$
(3
)
$
(2
)
$
4,208
$
3,695
221
180
54
60
159
155
434
395
2,146
1,744
707
512
97
95
8
(6
)
2,958
2,345
3,428
2,574
629
564
343
268
1
4,400
3,407
1,553
1,654
580
444
194
149
5
(9
)
2,332
2,238
488
581
208
159
73
57
2
(3
)
771
794
$
1,065
$
1,073
$
372
$
285
$
121
$
92
$
3
$
(6
)
$
1,561
$
1,444
$
149.8
$
117.1
$
49.0
$
49.1
$
21.2
$
15.6
$
$
$
220.0
$
181.8
290.3
226.4
75.7
71.3
22.9
17.4
6.2
6.1
395.1
321.2
191.8
166.1
23.8
18.2
.1
.1
215.7
184.4
$
8,849
$
7,936
$
1,667
$
1,691
$
1,672
$
1,370
$
(7
)
$
(8
)
$
12,181
$
10,989
681
648
154
218
448
429
1,283
1,295
5,942
5,013
2,015
1,728
283
273
9
10
8,249
7,024
9,289
7,579
1,885
1,747
973
810
2
3
12,149
10,139
4,821
4,722
1,643
1,454
534
404
(1
)
6,998
6,579
1,638
1,662
580
521
202
153
(1
)
2,420
2,335
3,183
3,060
1,063
933
332
251
4,578
4,244
(98
)
(178
)
(276
)
$
3,183
$
3,060
$
1,063
$
835
$
332
$
73
$
$
$
4,578
$
3,968
$
140.8
$
113.4
$
49.4
$
49.5
$
19.3
$
14.8
$
$
$
209.5
$
177.7
271.9
222.5
76.1
70.3
21.1
16.6
6.2
6.2
375.3
315.6
184.1
162.5
21.8
17.9
.1
.1
206.0
180.5
(1)
Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets
and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets. Interest earned includes
actual interest earned on segment assets and, if the segment has excess
liabilities, interest credits for providing funding to other segments. The
cost of liabilities includes actual interest expense on segment
liabilities and, if the segment does not have enough liabilities to fund
its assets, a funding charge based on the cost of excess liabilities from
another segment. In general, Community Banking has excess liabilities and
receives interest credits for the funding it provides the other segments.
(2)
Generally, the provision for loan losses represents actual net
charge-offs for each operating segment.
(3)
The reconciling items for net interest income, noninterest income and net
income are from Corporate level equity investment activities. The material
item in the reconciliation column for average assets is unallocated
goodwill held at the enterprise level.
Table of Contents
Quarter
Nine months
ended September 30
,
ended September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
393
$
271
$
1,003
$
696
(82
)
(158
)
(1,266
)
(279
)
319
226
1,787
519
143
87
353
262
$
773
$
426
$
1,877
$
1,198
(1)
Includes impairment write-downs on other retained interests of $2 million
and $59 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, and $79 million and $496 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Table of Contents
Quarter ended Sept. 30
,
Nine months ended Sept. 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
6,375
$
7,865
$
6,677
$
7,365
1,377
492
2,872
1,615
874
268
1,730
984
(572
)
(534
)
(2,301
)
(1,271
)
(492
)
(887
)
(1,338
)
(887
)
27
(1,030
)
(51
)
(1,632
)
$
7,589
$
6,174
$
7,589
$
6,174
$
2,554
$
1,909
$
2,188
$
1,124
737
1,212
1,522
(238
)
(238
)
(492
)
(887
)
(1,338
)
(887
)
$
1,824
$
1,759
$
1,824
$
1,759
$
5,765
$
4,415
$
5,765
$
4,415
(1)
Based on September 30, 2003 assumptions, the weighted-average
amortization period for mortgage servicing rights added during third
quarter 2003 and the first nine months of 2003 was approximately 7.4 years
and 5.6 years, respectively.
September 30
,
(in billions)
2003
2002
$
560
$
495
114
75
674
570
18
45
$
692
$
615
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
(1)
Credit risk amounts reflect the replacement cost for those contracts in a
gain position in the event of nonperformance by counterparties.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2003
Other
consolidating
subsidiaries/
Consolidated
(in millions)
Parent
WFFI
eliminations
Company
$
3,866
$
1,057
$
(1,670
)
$
3,253
138
309
5,610
6,057
128
178
9,919
10,225
(333
)
(612
)
(18,172
)
(19,117
)
(33
)
(600
)
(183
)
(816
)
(17,972
)
(17,972
)
1,259
1,259
(13,468
)
(13,468
)
3,683
9,622
449
13,754
(14,842
)
(568
)
(15,410
)
(3,682
)
(3,682
)
(1,042
)
1,042
(11,225
)
11,225
3,583
(3,583
)
37
(37
)
85
(3,043
)
(2,958
)
(8,746
)
(5,860
)
(27,522
)
(42,128
)
19
34,501
34,520
(1,502
)
(1,057
)
(5,298
)
(7,857
)
13,553
7,976
4,148
25,677
(3,364
)
(1,648
)
(9,676
)
(14,688
)
700
700
544
544
(1,289
)
(1,289
)
(1,767
)
(600
)
600
(1,767
)
638
638
6,875
4,690
24,913
36,478
1,995
(113
)
(4,279
)
(2,397
)
3,160
295
14,365
17,820
$
5,155
$
182
$
10,086
$
15,423
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2002
Other
consolidating
subsidiaries/
Consolidated
(in millions)
Parent
WFFI
eliminations
Company
$
3,620
$
776
$
(10,802
)
$
(6,406
)
386
636
13,544
14,566
96
98
6,302
6,496
(131
)
(845
)
(10,483
)
(11,459
)
(577
)
(281
)
284
(574
)
(8,129
)
(8,129
)
877
877
(1,950
)
(1,950
)
8,035
406
8,441
(10,235
)
(375
)
(10,610
)
(844
)
844
231
(231
)
209
(209
)
(14
)
(5,583
)
(5,597
)
(630
)
(2,606
)
(4,703
)
(7,939
)
9
13,881
13,890
(3,059
)
330
(5,571
)
(8,300
)
5,308
2,827
8,657
16,792
(2,534
)
(1,325
)
(3,633
)
(7,492
)
450
450
412
412
(1,206
)
(1,206
)
(1,402
)
(45
)
45
(1,402
)
46
46
(2,031
)
1,796
13,425
13,190
959
(34
)
(2,080
)
(1,155
)
2,910
255
13,803
16,968
$
3,869
$
221
$
11,723
$
15,813
Table of Contents
% Change
Quarter ended
Sept. 30, 2003 from
Nine months ended
Sept. 30,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
Sept. 30,
Sept. 30,
%
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2003
2003
2002
2003
2002
2003
2002
Change
$
1,561
$
1,525
$
1,444
2
%
8
%
$
4,578
$
4,244
8
%
.92
.90
.84
2
10
2.70
2.46
10
1.57
%
1.63
%
1.78
%
(4
)
(12
)
1.63
%
1.80
%
(9
)
18.86
19.60
19.38
(4
)
(3
)
19.39
19.69
(2
)
$
1,561
$
1,525
$
1,444
2
8
$
4,578
$
3,968
15
.92
.90
.84
2
10
2.70
2.30
17
1.57
%
1.63
%
1.78
%
(4
)
(12
)
1.63
%
1.68
%
(3
)
18.86
19.60
19.38
(4
)
(3
)
19.39
18.41
5
61.4
58.9
56.4
4
9
59.5
56.3
6
$
7,166
$
6,755
$
6,040
6
19
$
20,430
$
18,013
13
.45
.30
.28
50
61
1.05
.82
28
1,677.2
1,675.7
1,700.7
(1
)
1,678.0
1,704.7
(2
)
1,693.9
1,690.6
1,717.8
(1
)
1,692.6
1,722.6
(2
)
$
220,027
$
208,912
$
181,782
5
21
$
209,453
$
177,749
18
395,057
375,149
321,217
5
23
375,272
315,568
19
215,685
205,428
184,448
5
17
206,041
180,521
14
5.03
%
5.12
%
5.52
%
(2
)
(9
)
5.14
%
5.62
%
(9
)
$
30,260
$
24,625
$
32,974
23
(8
)
$
30,260
$
32,974
(8
)
231,844
215,392
186,310
8
24
231,844
186,310
24
3,893
3,894
3,861
1
3,893
3,861
1
9,849
9,803
9,744
1
9,849
9,744
1
390,813
369,645
334,250
6
17
390,813
334,250
17
209,422
210,722
190,606
(1
)
10
209,422
190,606
10
32,316
32,223
30,016
8
32,316
30,016
8
32,372
32,275
30,074
8
32,372
30,074
8
24,569
23,850
21,026
3
17
24,569
21,026
17
35,089
34,388
30,547
2
15
35,089
30,547
15
8.27
%
8.72
%
8.98
%
(5
)
(8
)
8.27
%
8.98
%
(8
)
8.28
8.73
9.00
(5
)
(8
)
8.28
9.00
(8
)
8.07
7.93
7.84
2
3
8.07
7.84
3
11.53
11.43
11.39
1
1
11.53
11.39
1
6.44
6.59
6.83
(2)
(6)
6.44
6.83
(6)
$
19.27
$
19.20
$
17.67
9
$
19.27
$
17.67
9
139,200
135,500
125,700
3
11
139,200
125,700
11
$
53.71
$
52.80
$
54.84
2
(2
)
$
53.71
$
54.84
(2
)
48.90
45.01
38.10
9
28
43.27
38.10
14
51.50
50.40
48.16
2
7
51.50
48.16
7
(1)
Change in accounting principle relates to transitional goodwill
impairment charge recorded in first quarter 2002 related to the adoption
of
FAS 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
.
(2)
The efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by total
revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(3)
See the Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements section for
additional information.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
(1)
The average prime rate of the Company was 4.00% and 4.75% for the
quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 4.16% and
4.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. The average three-month London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) was 1.13% and 1.81% for the quarters ended September 30, 2003
and 2002, respectively, and 1.23% and 1.88% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of hedge and risk
management activities associated with the respective asset and liability
categories.
(3)
Yields are based on amortized cost balances computed on a settlement
date basis.
(4)
Includes certain preferred securities.
(5)
Nonaccrual loans and related income are included in their respective
loan categories.
(6)
Includes taxable-equivalent adjustments primarily related to tax-exempt
income on certain loans and securities. The federal statutory tax rate
was 35% for all periods presented.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Quarter
ended Sept. 30
,
%
Nine months
ended Sept. 30
,
%
(in millions)
2003
2002
Change
2003
2002
Change
$
607
$
560
8
%
$
1,747
$
1,612
8
%
348
327
6
995
1,004
(1
)
156
135
16
438
391
12
504
462
9
1,433
1,395
3
251
242
4
752
666
13
48
47
2
136
139
(2
)
199
160
24
565
432
31
175
165
6
460
438
5
422
372
13
1,161
1,009
15
393
271
45
1,003
696
44
(82
)
(158
)
(48
)
(1,266
)
(279
)
354
319
226
41
1,787
519
244
143
87
64
353
262
35
773
426
81
1,877
1,198
57
252
234
8
807
766
5
(23
)
121
16
202
(92
)
58
(152
)
(87
)
(230
)
(62
)
19
7
171
23
15
53
(9
)
(100
)
27
(6
)
95
82
16
493
397
24
$
2,958
$
2,345
26
%
$
8,249
$
7,024
17
%
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Quarter
ended Sept. 30
,
%
Nine months
ended Sept. 30
,
%
(in millions)
2003
2002
Change
2003
2002
Change
$
1,185
$
1,110
7
%
$
3,481
$
3,292
6
%
621
446
39
1,571
1,165
35
374
304
23
1,143
997
15
298
232
28
871
697
25
283
278
2
867
821
6
4
10
26
(62
)
122
108
13
345
309
12
270
129
109
675
353
91
105
91
15
306
262
17
92
94
(2
)
256
263
(3
)
98
85
15
275
243
13
98
85
15
274
229
20
94
65
45
265
189
40
62
51
22
173
164
5
48
29
66
166
141
18
29
40
(28
)
149
115
30
41
41
125
121
3
35
38
(8
)
107
118
(9
)
541
181
199
1,090
634
72
$
4,400
$
3,407
29
%
$
12,149
$
10,139
20
%
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Sept. 30, 2003
Dec. 31, 2002
Sept. 30, 2002
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
fair
fair
fair
(in millions)
Cost
value
Cost
value
Cost
value
$
1,190
$
1,244
$
1,315
$
1,381
$
1,592
$
1,665
2,601
2,757
2,232
2,382
2,291
2,458
20,006
20,892
17,766
19,090
21,958
23,380
1,827
1,908
1,775
1,880
2,057
2,187
21,833
22,800
19,541
20,970
24,015
25,567
2,837
3,004
2,608
2,658
2,786
2,805
28,461
29,805
25,696
27,391
30,684
32,495
333
455
598
556
578
479
$
28,794
$
30,260
$
26,294
$
27,947
$
31,262
$
32,974
(1)
Substantially all private collateralized mortgage obligations are
AAA-rated bonds collateralized by 1-4 family residential first mortgages.
Table of Contents
(in millions)
Sept. 30, 2003
Dec. 31, 2002
Sept. 30, 2002
$
1,542
$
1,851
$
1,974
(76
)
(198
)
(262
)
$
1,466
$
1,653
$
1,712
Quarter
Nine months
ended Sept. 30
,
ended Sept. 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
60
$
196
$
141
$
478
(33
)
(155
)
(105
)
(362
)
$
27
$
41
$
36
$
116
(1)
Includes other-than-temporary impairment of nil and $50 million for the
third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with
$103 million and $156 million for the same periods of 2002.
Fair
Net unrealized
Remaining
(in billions)
value
gain (loss)
maturity
At September 30, 2003
$
22.8
$
1.0
4 yrs., 7 mos.
20.3
(1.5
)
10 yrs., 2 mos.
23.5
1.7
2 yrs., 4 mos.
Table of Contents
% Change
Sept. 30, 2003 from
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2002
2002
2002
$
47,720
$
47,292
$
46,827
1
%
2
%
59,680
40,976
33,773
46
77
25,723
25,312
25,233
2
2
7,777
7,804
7,887
(1
)
40,681
31,290
30,193
30
35
7,836
7,455
7,033
5
11
31,919
26,353
24,912
21
28
80,436
65,098
62,138
24
29
8,185
8,241
8,593
(1
)
(5
)
2,323
1,911
1,859
22
25
$
231,844
$
196,634
$
186,310
18
%
24
%
(1)
Includes agricultural loans (loans to finance agricultural production and
other loans to farmers) of $3,750 million, $4,473 million and $3,973
million at September 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002,
respectively.
(2)
Includes agricultural loans that are secured by real estate of $1,083
million, $1,111 million and $1,179 million at September 30, 2003, December
31, 2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively.
Table of Contents
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2002
$
713
$
796
$
840
203
214
215
267
192
198
48
93
112
134
65
39
78
48
55
212
113
94
71
79
85
3
5
5
1,517
1,492
1,549
.65
%
.76
%
.83
%
200
201
186
6
4
2
$
1,723
$
1,697
$
1,737
(1)
Includes commercial agricultural loans of $65 million, $48 million and
$55 million at September 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and September 30,
2002, respectively.
(2)
Includes agricultural loans secured by real estate of $26 million, $30
million and $24 million at September 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and
September 30, 2002, respectively.
(3)
Includes impaired loans of $681 million, $612 million and $624 million at
September 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002,
respectively.
(4)
Represents the amount of real estate investments (contingent interest
loans accounted for as investments) that would be classified as nonaccrual
if such assets were recorded as loans. Real estate investments totaled $9
million, $9 million and $11 million at September 30, 2003, December 31,
2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively.
Table of Contents
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2002
$
385
$
309
$
319
296
303
305
$
681
$
612
$
624
(1)
Includes $72 million, $201 million and $130 million of impaired loans
with a related allowance of $10 million, $52 million and $18 million at
September 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002,
respectively.
Sept. 30
,
Dec. 31
,
Sept. 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2002
$
68
$
92
$
91
66
56
52
15
7
47
8
11
26
84
67
78
134
131
111
315
308
266
533
506
455
$
690
$
672
$
671
Table of Contents
Quarter
Nine months
ended September 30
,
ended September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
3,894
$
3,883
$
3,862
$
3,761
(1
)
(2
)
31
93
434
395
1,283
1,295
(136
)
(159
)
(437
)
(534
)
(8
)
(3
)
(22
)
(18
)
(12
)
(2
)
(23
)
(14
)
(2
)
(9
)
(8
)
(34
)
(19
)
(14
)
(63
)
(43
)
(109
)
(99
)
(337
)
(307
)
(206
)
(212
)
(602
)
(595
)
(334
)
(325
)
(1,002
)
(945
)
(26
)
(21
)
(76
)
(68
)
(29
)
(19
)
(74
)
(63
)
(547
)
(538
)
(1,642
)
(1,676
)
31
36
106
120
1
1
2
4
2
3
7
12
2
10
11
19
7
4
18
12
13
12
38
36
46
49
145
158
66
65
201
206
6
4
19
16
5
4
13
11
113
123
359
388
(434
)
(415
)
(1,283
)
(1,288
)
$
3,893
$
3,861
$
3,893
$
3,861
.78
%
.91
%
.82
%
.97
%
1.68
%
2.07
%
1.68
%
2.07
%
Table of Contents
September 30
,
December 31
,
September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2002
$
10,279
$
10,167
$
7,906
3,709
5,219
5,860
1,713
1,657
1,651
1,691
1,591
1,511
1,600
1,473
1,387
5,004
4,721
4,549
2,326
2,336
2,378
1,209
1,139
1,235
761
868
905
608
352
2,006
200
201
186
161
110
102
8,461
6,684
8,156
$
32,718
$
31,797
$
33,283
Table of Contents
September 30
,
December 31
,
September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2002
$
77,175
$
74,094
$
69,382
2,506
2,625
2,258
109,804
99,183
95,597
19,937
22,332
23,369
209,422
198,234
190,606
35,807
9,228
12,793
6,207
9,454
2,357
$
251,436
$
216,916
$
205,756
Table of Contents
To be well
capitalized under
the FDICIA
For capital
prompt corrective
Actual
adequacy purposes
action provisions
(in billions)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
$
35.1
11.53
%
>=
$
24.3
>=
8.00
%
20.9
11.88
>=
14.0
>=
8.00
>=
$
17.6
>=
10.00
%
3.6
12.91
>=
2.3
>=
8.00
>=
2.8
>=
10.00
$
24.6
8.07
%
>=
$
12.2
>=
4.00
%
13.3
7.60
>=
7.0
>=
4.00
>=
$
10.5
>=
6.00
%
3.4
11.91
>=
1.1
>=
4.00
>=
1.7
>=
6.00
$
24.6
6.44
%
>=
$
15.3
>=
4.00
%(1)
13.3
6.12
>=
8.7
>=
4.00
(1)
>=
$
10.9
>=
5.00
%
3.4
5.62
>=
2.4
>=
4.00
(1)
>=
3.0
>=
5.00
(1)
The leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly
average total assets, excluding goodwill and certain other items. The
minimum leverage ratio guideline is 3% for banking organizations that do
not anticipate significant growth and that have well-diversified risk,
excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings, effective
management and monitoring of market risk and, in general, are considered
top-rated, strong banking organizations.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
projections of our revenues, income, earnings per share, capital
expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items;
descriptions of plans or objectives of our management for future
operations, products or services, including pending acquisitions;
forecasts of our future economic performance; and
descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing.
the expected benefits of the strategic actions taken in third quarter 2003;
future credit losses and nonperforming assets;
the future value of mortgage servicing rights;
the future value of equity securities, including those in our venture capital portfolios;
the impact of new accounting standards;
future short-term and long-term interest rate levels and their
impact on our net interest margin, net income, liquidity and capital;
and
the impact of the VISA USA Inc. settlement on our earnings.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;
recommendations by securities analysts;
new technology used, or services offered, by our competitors;
significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures
or capital commitments by or involving us or our competitors;
failure to integrate our acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from our acquisitions;
operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to
us;
news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services
industry;
changes in government regulations; and
geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|
(a) | Exhibits |
The Companys SEC file number is 001-2979. On and before November 2, 1998, the Company filed documents with the SEC under the name Norwest Corporation. The former Wells Fargo & Company filed documents under SEC file number 001-6214. |
3(a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 28, 1993. Certificates of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 3, 1995 (authorizing preference stock), Exhibits 3(b) and 3(c) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 (changing the Companys name and increasing authorized common and preferred stock, respectively) and Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (increasing authorized common stock) |
(b) | Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and Change of Registered Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 |
(c) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 1995 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1995 |
(d) | Certificate Eliminating the Certificate of Designations for the Companys Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 1, 1995 |
(e) | Certificate Eliminating the Certificate of Designations for the Companys 10.24% Cumulative Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 1996 |
(f) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 1996 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26, 1996 |
64
3(g) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 1997 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 14, 1997 |
(h) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 1998 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 1998 |
(i) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys Adjustable Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(j) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 |
(j) | Certificate Eliminating the Certificate of Designations for the Companys Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 1999 |
(k) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 1999 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 1999 |
(l) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 2000 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(o) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 |
(m) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 2001 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2001 |
(n) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 2002 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 16, 2002 |
(o) | Certificate of Designations for the Companys 2003 ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 15, 2003 |
(p) | By-Laws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(m) to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 |
65
4(a) | See Exhibits 3(a) through 3(p) |
(b) | The Company agrees to furnish upon request to the Commission a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of senior and subordinated debt of the Company. |
10(a)
Amendment effective January 1, 2004 to the Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the former
Norwest, filed herewith
(b)
Amendment effective January 1, 2004 to the
Directors Formula Stock Award Plan for directors of the
former Norwest, filed herewith
(c)
Amendment effective January 1, 2004 to the
Directors Stock Deferral Plan for directors of the former
Norwest, filed herewith
(d)
Amendment effective January 1, 2004 to the
Deferral Plan for Directors of the former Wells Fargo, filed
herewith
(e)
Amendment effective January 1, 2004 to the
Directors Stock Compensation and Deferral Plan, filed herewith
(f)
Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and
restated effective January 1, 2004, filed herewith
31(a)
Certification of principal executive officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith
(b)
Certification of principal financial officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith
32(a)
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, furnished herewith
(b)
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, furnished
herewith
99(a)
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges,
filed herewith. The ratios of earnings to fixed charges,
including interest on deposits, were 3.62 and 3.14 for the
quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and
3.55 and 3.09 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively. The ratios of earnings to fixed charges,
excluding interest on deposits, were 5.62 and 4.97 for the
quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and
5.64 and 4.89 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
66
99(b)
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and Preferred Dividends, filed herewith. The ratios of earnings
to fixed charges and preferred dividends, including interest on
deposits, were 3.62 and 3.13 for the quarters ended September
30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 3.54 and 3.08 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends,
excluding interest on deposits, were 5.61 and 4.95 for the
quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and
5.62 and 4.88 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
(b) | The Company filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the third quarter of 2003: |
(1) | July 3, 2003, under Item 7, filing as exhibits documents regarding the Companys medium-term note program, Series E, and subordinated medium-term note program Series F |
(2) | July 8, 2003, under Item 7, filing as an exhibit the form of note for the Companys Basket Linked Notes due October 9, 2008 |
(3) | July 15, 2003, under Item 12, regarding the Companys financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 |
(4) | July 30, 2003, under Item 7, filing as exhibits documents regarding the issuance by Wells Fargo Capital VIII of its 5.625% Capital Securities and the issuance by the Company of its 5.625% Junior Subordinated Debentures due August 1, 2033 |
(5) | August 29, 2003, under Item 7, filing as an exhibit the form of note for the Companys Callable Notes Linked to the S&P 500 Index due August 25, 2009 |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 7, 2003 |
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
|
|||
By: | /s/ Richard D. Levy | |||
Richard D. Levy | ||||
Senior Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||
67
Exhibit 10(a)
AMENDMENT TO THE NORWEST CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
The Norwest Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the Plan) is amended effective January 1, 2004 as follows:
1. The third sentence in paragraph 5(b) of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
A participants election to defer is irrevocable, except as provided hereinafter in paragraphs 5(d), 7(b) and 7(c).
2. Paragraph 7(b) of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentences to the end thereof to read in full as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of payment of a Deferred Cash Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new payment commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 payment commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 payment commencement date. A new payment commencement election shall not change the form of payment (lump sum or installments) originally elected by the participant.
3. Paragraph 7(c) of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentences to the end thereof to read in full as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of payment of a Phantom Stock Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new payment commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 payment commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 payment commencement date. Such an election shall also apply to amounts credited to a participants Deferred Cash Account as a result of a subsequent election by the participant under paragraph 5(d). A new payment commencement election shall not change the form of payment (lump sum or installments) originally elected by the participant.
4. The Plan is amended by the addition of new paragraph 13 to read in full as follows:
13. Severability . If any provision of the Plan is determined to be illegal or invalid (in whole or in part) for any reason, or if legislative, Internal Revenue
Service, Department of Labor, court or other action could in the opinion of the Plan Administrator cause a provision to be interpreted so as to cause participants in the Plan to be in constructive receipt of amounts in their Deferred Cash or Phantom Stock Accounts for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the provision had not been included in the Plan.
Exhibit 10(b)
AMENDMENT TO THE NORWEST CORPORATION
DIRECTORS FORMULA STOCK AWARD PLAN
The Norwest Corporation Directors Formula Stock Award Plan (the Plan) is amended effective January 1, 2004 as follows:
1. Section 8 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence after the first sentence to read in full as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of distribution of a Deferred Stock Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new distribution commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 distribution commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 distribution commencement date.
2. Section 9 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence after the first sentence to read in full as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of distribution of a Deferred Stock Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new distribution commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 distribution commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 distribution commencement date.
3. The Plan is amended by the addition of new Section 19 to read in full as follows:
19. Severability . If any provision of the Plan is determined to be illegal or invalid (in whole or in part) for any reason, or if legislative, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, court or other action could in the opinion of the Plan Administrator cause a provision to be interpreted so as to cause participants in the Plan to be in constructive receipt of amounts in their Deferred Stock Accounts for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the provision had not been included in the Plan.
Exhibit 10(c)
AMENDMENT TO THE NORWEST CORPORATION
DIRECTORS STOCK DEFERRAL PLAN
The Norwest Corporation Directors Stock Deferral Plan (the Plan) is amended effective January 1, 2004 as follows:
1. Section 8 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence after the second sentence to read in full as follows:
In addition, notwithstanding his or her election pursuant to Section 3, a participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of payment of a Deferred Stock Account or Deferred Cash Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new payment commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 payment commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 payment commencement date.
2. Section 9 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence after the first sentence to read in full as follows:
Notwithstanding such election, a participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of payment of a Deferred Stock Account or Deferred Cash Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new payment commencement date (i.e., March of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 payment commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 payment commencement date.
3. The Plan is amended by the addition of new Section 23 to read in full as follows:
23. Severability . If any provision of the Plan is determined to be illegal or invalid (in whole or in part) for any reason, or if legislative, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, court or other action could in the opinion of the Plan Administrator cause a provision to be interpreted so as to cause participants in the Plan to be in constructive receipt of amounts in their Deferred Stock Accounts and Deferred Cash Accounts for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the provision had not been included in the Plan.
Exhibit 10(d)
AMENDMENT TO THE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
DEFERRAL PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
The Wells Fargo & Company Deferral Plan for Directors (the Plan) is amended effective January 1, 2004 as follows:
1. Paragraph III.D. of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
The designations shall be made at the same time as the deferral election pursuant to paragraph III and shall be irrevocable with respect to the year in question except as provided in paragraph V.B.
2. The last sentence of paragraph V. B. of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
The designations shall be made at the same time as the deferral election pursuant to paragraph III and shall be irrevocable with respect to the year in question except that a participant may while still a member of the Board, elect one time to defer commencement of the payment until January 1 of any year so long as the new payment commencement date (i.e., the January 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original January 1 payment commencement date. To be effective, the election must be made by the participant at least 12 months prior to the original January 1 payment commencement date. A new payment commencement date election shall not change the form of payment (lump sum or installments) originally elected by the participant.
3. The Plan is amended by the addition of new paragraph VI. (E) to read in full as follows:
(E) If any provision of the Plan is determined to be illegal or invalid (in whole or in part) for any reason, or if legislative, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, court or other action could in the opinion of the Plan Administrator cause a provision to be interpreted so as to cause participants in the Plan to be in constructive receipt of amounts in their sub-accounts for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the provision had not been included in the Plan.
Exhibit 10(e)
AMENDMENT TO THE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
DIRECTORS STOCK COMPENSATION AND DEFERRAL PLAN
The Wells Fargo & Company Directors Stock Compensation and Deferral Plan (the Plan) is amended effective January 1, 2004 as follows:
1. Article II. of the Plan is amended by deleting the words Stock Option Gains from the definitions of Deferred Stock Account and Eligible Compensation and by deleting the definition of Stock Option Gain without replacement.
2. Article IV. C. of the Plan is deleted in its entirety without replacement.
3. The second sentence in Article VI. A. of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
A Deferral Election, once made, will be irrevocable except as provided for in Article VI. E. of the Plan with respect to the time distributions will commence, and will apply to the Deferral Year for which it was made.
4. Article VI. B. 3. of the Plan is deleted in its entirety without replacement and the remaining subsection are renumbered accordingly.
5. Article VI. C. 2. of the Plan is deleted in its entirety without replacement and the remaining subsections are renumbered accordingly.
6. The second sentence of Article VI. D. 1. of the Plan is deleted in its entirety without replacement.
7. The first sentence of Article VI. D. 3. of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
Any Cash Compensation, Formula Stock Awards or Retirement Conversion Amounts that are deferred into the Deferred Stock Account will receive a credit to the Deferred Stock Account on the date the Cash Compensation, Formula Stock Award or Retirement Conversion Amount would have otherwise been paid or realized.
8. Article VI. E. 1. of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
1. Distribution from the Deferred Cash Account . A Deferral Participants Deferred Cash Account will be distributed in cash. Distributions will be made in a lump sum or in up to 10 annual installments, as specified in the Deferral Participants Deferral Election, as of: i) March 1 of the first calendar year following
termination of the Deferral Participants service as a Non-Employee Director, or ii) March 1 of any other year elected by the Deferral Participant which begins at least 12 months following the year in which the deferred compensation would otherwise have been received, or iii) July 1 of the calendar year in which the Deferral Participants service as a Non-Employee Director terminates if such termination occurs on or before June 30; provided, however, that if July 1 installments are elected, subsequent annual installments shall be payable as of March 1 of each year thereafter. The amount of each installment distribution will be equal to the total amount of the account divided by the number of installments remaining to be made, including the current installment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Deferral Participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of distribution of a Deferred Cash Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new distribution commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 distribution commencement date or 44 months beyond the original July 1 distribution commencement date, as applicable. To be effective, the election must be made by the Deferral Participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 or July 1 distribution commencement date, as applicable. A new distribution commencement election shall not change the form of distribution (lump sum or installments) originally elected by the Deferral Participant.
9 Article VI. E. 2. of the Plan is amended to read in full as follows:
2. Distribution from the Deferred Stock Account . A Deferral Participants Deferred Stock Account will be distributed in whole shares of Common Stock. Distributions will be made in a lump sum or in up to 10 annual installments as specified in the Deferral Participants Deferral Election, as of: i) March 1 of the first calendar year following termination of the Deferral Participants service as a Non-Employee Director, or ii) March 1 of any other year elected by the Deferral Participant which begins at least 12 months following the year in which the deferred compensation would otherwise have been received, or iii) July 1 of the calendar year in which the Deferral Participants service as a Non-Employee Director terminates if such termination occurs on or before June 30; provided, however, that if July 1 installments are elected, subsequent annual installments shall be payable as of March 1 of each year thereafter. The amount of each installment distribution will be equal to the total amount of the account divided by the number of installments remaining to be made, including the current installment, rounded up to the nearest whole share and the whole number of shares so distributed shall be deducted from the total amount of the account. The final distribution will be rounded up to the nearest whole share. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Deferral Participant, while still a member of the Board, may elect one time to defer commencement of distribution of a Deferred Stock Account until March 1 of any year so long as the new distribution commencement date (i.e., March 1 of the year so elected) is at least 36 months beyond the original March 1 distribution commencement date or 44 months beyond the original July 1 distribution commencement date, as applicable. To be effective, the election must be made by the Deferral Participant at least 12 months prior to the original March 1 or July 1 distribution commencement date, as
applicable. A new distribution commencement election shall not change the form of distribution (lump sum or installments) originally elected by the Deferral Participant.
10. The last sentence of Article VI. E. 4. of the Plan is amended by deleting the words Deferred Formula Stock Award Account and Deferred Stock Option Gain Account without replacement.
11. Article XI. of the Plan is amended by the addition of new Section C. to read in full as follows:
C. Severability . If any provision of the Plan is determined to be illegal or invalid (in whole or in part) for any reason, or if legislative, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, court or other action could in the opinion of the Plan Administrator cause a provision to be interpreted so as to cause Participants in the Plan to be in constructive receipt of amounts in their Deferred Cash or Stock Accounts for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the provision had not been included in the Plan.
Exhibit 10(f)
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Amended and Restated January 1, 2004)
1. Purpose of the Plan . On July 27, 1993, the Board of Directors of Norwest Corporation, a Delaware corporation now known as Wells Fargo & Company (the Company), authorized the creation of a nonqualified, unfunded, elective deferral plan known as the Norwest Corporation Employees Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan) for the purpose of allowing a select group of management and highly compensated employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to defer the receipt of compensation which would otherwise be paid to those employees. Effective July 1, 1999, the name of the Plan was changed to the Wells Fargo & Company Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company reserved the power to amend and terminate the Plan by action of the Human Resources Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. The Human Resources Committee exercises that reserved power of amendment by the adoption of this amended and restated Plan document effective January 1, 2004.
2. Definitions . When the following terms are used herein with initial capital letters, they shall have the following meanings:
(A) | CD Option . An earnings option based on a certificate of deposit in such denomination and for such duration as is determined from time to time by the Plan Administrator. |
(B) | Common Stock . Shares of Wells Fargo & Company common stock. |
(C) | Common Stock Earnings Option . An earnings option based on shares of Common Stock. |
(D) | Compensation . Salaries, bonuses and commissions earned by the Eligible Employee during the Deferral Year for services rendered to the Company or the Companys subsidiaries as determined by the Plan Administrator and payable no later than March 31 of the following Deferral Year. |
(E) | Deferral Account . A bookkeeping account maintained for each Participant to which is credited the amounts deferred under a Deferral Election and a Stock Option Gain Deferral Election, together with any increase or decrease thereon based on the earnings options selected by the Participant or mandated by the Plan. |
(F) | Deferral Election . An irrevocable election made by an Eligible Employee during an enrollment period specified by the Plan Administrator to defer the receipt of Compensation for a given Deferral Year. |
(G) | Deferral Year . The Plan Year following the year in which a Deferral Election is made. |
(H) | Eligible Employee . Each employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries who has been selected for participation in this Plan for a given Plan Year pursuant to Section 3 of the Plan. |
(I) | Fund Options . An earnings option based on a selection of registered investment companies, collective investment funds, private portfolios, or other comparable investment media chosen from time to time by the Plan Administrator. |
(J) | Participant . Each Eligible Employee who has entered into a Deferral Election or Stock Option Gain Deferral Election for a given Deferral Year and each employee who has a Transferred Account set up under the Plan shall be considered a Participant. An employee who has become a Participant shall be considered to continue as a Participant in the Plan until the date of the Participants death or, if earlier, the date the Participant no longer has any Deferral Accounts under the Plan. |
(K) | Plan Administrator . For purposes of Section 3(16)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the Human Resources Committee of the Companys Board of Directors has designated that the Plan Administrator shall be the Companys Director of Human Resources. |
(L) | Plan Year . The twelve month period beginning on any January 1 and ending the following December 31. |
(M) | Stock Option Gain Compensation . Certain gains derived from specified Common Stock option grants under the Companys Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and any other stock option plan approved by the Plan Administrator. |
(N) | Stock Option Gain Deferral Election . An irrevocable election made by an Eligible Employee to defer the receipt of Stock Option Gain Compensation. Effective January 1, 2004, the Plan will no longer permit Eligible Employees to enter into Stock Option Gain Deferral Elections. |
(O) | Transferred Account . The bookkeeping account maintained for each Participant to which is credited the Participants interest in any nonqualified deferred compensation plan transferred to this Plan, together with any increase or decrease thereon based on the earnings options selected by the Participant or mandated by the Plan. |
3. Eligibility . Each regular and part-time highly compensated Eligible Employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries who has been selected for participation in this Plan by the Plan Administrator or by such officers of the Company to which the Plan Administrator has delegated its authority, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan for a given Plan Year.
4. Transferred Accounts . Any employee who had an account under the Wells Fargo & Company Benefit Restoration Program (BRP) on June 30, 1999 that transferred into this Plan on July 1, 1999, was deemed a Participant with respect to their transferred BRP accounts subject to the terms of Appendix A to this Plan. Effective January 1, 2000, the Norwest Corporation Elective Deferred Compensation Plan for Mortgage Banking Executives, Norwest Mortgage Banking Incentive Compensation and Deferral Plan and Norwest Mortgage Banking Deferral Plan (the Mortgage Plans) merged into this Plan. All accounts under the Mortgage Plans on December 31, 1999 transferred to this Plan on January 1, 2000. Any employee or former employee who had an account under the Mortgage Plans on December 31, 1999 was deemed to be a Participant in this Plan on January 1, 2000 with respect to their transferred Mortgage Plans accounts subject to the terms of Appendix A to this Plan. Effective January 1, 2000, the Wells Fargo & Company 1997 Bonus Deferral Plan (Bonus Deferral Plan) employee accounts merged into this Plan. Employee accounts under the Bonus Deferral Plan on December 31, 1999 transferred to this Plan on January 1, 2000. Any employee on January 1, 2000 who had an account under the Bonus Deferral Plan on December 31, 1999 was deemed to be a Participant in this Plan on January 1, 2000 with respect to their transferred Bonus Deferral Plan accounts subject to the terms of Appendix A to this Plan.
5. Deferral of Compensation . An Eligible Employee may elect to defer a portion of the Compensation that the Eligible Employee may earn from the Company or its subsidiaries during the Deferral Year following the year in which the Deferral Election is made. FICA taxes and certain other payroll deductions elected by the Eligible Employee shall be deducted before any deferrals are made under this Plan. Such Deferral Election shall be made as described in Section 6(A)(2).
2
6. Election to Participate and Defer Compensation and Stock Option Gain .
(A) | Deferral of Compensation . |
(1) | Participation . Except as provided in Section 6(A)(3) as to new Eligible Employees, an Eligible Employee becomes a Participant in the Plan by filing, during an enrollment period specified by the Plan Administrator but no later than December 31 of the year preceding the Deferral Year, an irrevocable Deferral Election. An Eligible Employee who has made a Deferral Election for any Deferral Year and has a Deferral Account is a Participant. The Deferral Election shall be effective only for the Deferral Year specified. A new Deferral Election must be filed for each Deferral Year. Amounts deferred under a Deferral Election shall be credited to a Deferral Account established under the Plan for the Eligible Employee. |
(2) | Deferral Election . The Deferral Election shall consist of the Eligible Employees election to defer Compensation, election of earnings option(s) as described in Section 7(A), and election of the timing and form of distribution of amounts deferred as described in Section 8. An Eligible Employee may elect to defer (subject to any limitations on Compensation imposed by the Plan Administrator for the Deferral Year), in any combination, all or a part of the Eligible Employees (a) base salary earned and paid on a periodic basis throughout the Deferral Year, (b) incentive pay earned throughout the Deferral Year and paid after the end of the Deferral Year, and (c) commissions and other periodic incentive payments paid during the Deferral Year. The Eligible Employee shall specify for each Compensation category an amount to be deferred per pay period, expressed either as a percentage or a dollar amount. |
(3) | Initial Deferral Election or Initial Eligibility . A new Eligible Employee must make a Deferral Election within thirty (30) days of the date the Eligible Employee receives notification of eligibility to participate in the Plan in order to defer Compensation earned in the current Deferral Year. |
(B) | Deferral of Stock Option Gains . |
(1) | Participation . Effective January 1, 2004, the Plan will no longer permit Eligible Employees to enter into Stock Option Gain Deferral Elections. Prior to January 1, 2004, an Eligible Employee could file at least twelve (12) months prior to exercise an option under the Wells Fargo & Company Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, an irrevocable Stock Option Gain Deferral Election. Stock Option Gain Deferral Elections entered into prior to January 1, 2004 became effective immediately. An Eligible Employee who had made a Stock Option Gain Deferral Election is a Participant. Amounts deferred under a Stock Option Gain Deferral Election shall be credited to a Deferral Account established under the Plan for the Eligible Employee. |
(2) | Deferral Election . Effective January 1, 2004, the Plan will no longer permit Eligible Employees to enter into Stock Option Gain Deferral Elections. Prior to January 1, 2004, a Stock Option Gain Deferral Election shall consist of the Eligible Employees election to defer all of the eligible Stock Option Gain Compensation derived from a specific stock option grant under the Wells Fargo & Company Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Eligible Stock Option Gain Compensation consists of only stock option gains realized using the stock-for-stock swap (stock swap) method of exercise. Stock option gains derived from either a cash exercise or a same day sale will not be eligible Stock Option Gain Compensation. Therefore, if an Eligible Employee elects to defer the stock option gain derived from a specific stock option grant, the Eligible Employee must agree to use the stock swap method under the terms and conditions of such grant. Stock option gains from stock swaps will be allocated solely to the Common Stock Earnings Option. The Stock Option Gain Deferral Election must also specify the timing and form of distribution of the amount deferred as described in Section 8. |
3
(3) | Effect on Stock Options . The filing of a Stock Option Gain Deferral Election (prior to January 1, 2004) prohibits the Participant from exercising the stock option for at least twelve (12) months. Termination of employment for any reason prior to exercise will void the Stock Option Gain Deferral Election. |
7. Deferral Account Valuation .
(A) | Earnings Options . The earnings options available for selection on the Deferral Election are as follows: |
(1) | Common Stock Earnings Option |
(2) | CD Option |
(3) | Fund Options |
A Participant must choose to allocate amounts credited to the Participants Deferral Account among the earnings options in increments of one (1) percent. Except as to new Eligible Employees, the initial election of earnings options must be made by the Participant in advance of each Deferral Year. A Participants Stock Option Gain Deferral Election will automatically be allocated to the Common Stock Earnings Option. In addition, a minimum of twenty (20) percent of the amount of Compensation deferred during a Deferral Year must be allocated to the Common Stock Earnings Option. Except with respect to the portion of the Deferral Account allocated to the Common Stock Earnings Option, after the initial election of earnings options, a Participant shall be entitled to change the earnings options for the Participants entire Deferral Account with such frequency (but no more than twice each year) and effective as of such dates as determined by the Plan Administrator by making an earnings option election with the Plan Administrator pursuant to a procedure established by the Plan Administrator. Such earnings option election will not change the earnings options selected by the Participant on the current Deferral Years Deferral Election for the remaining Compensation to be deferred in the current Deferral Year. |
(B) | Periodic Credits of Deferral Amounts . The Participants Deferral Account shall be credited with the amount of the deferred Compensation on the day such deferred Compensation would otherwise be paid to a Participant. All periodic credits to a Participants Deferral Account under the Fund Options shall be in share equivalents of the Fund Options. All periodic credits to a Participants Deferral Account under the Common Stock Earnings Option shall be in share equivalents of Common Stock. The number of share equivalents of Common Stock credited to a Participants Deferral Accounts for Compensation deferrals under the Common Stock Earnings Option shall be determined by dividing the amount of each periodic credit by the New York Stock Exchange- only closing price per share of Common Stock on the day that the deferred Compensation is credited to the Participants Deferral Account (or, if the New York Stock Exchange is closed on that date, on the next preceding date on which it is open). When a stock option covered by a Stock Option Gain Deferral Election is exercised using a stock swap, the Participants Deferral Account will be credited on the stock option exercise date. The amount of each credit shall be equal to the amount deferred from the Participants Compensation and/or Stock Option Gain Compensation. In the case of Compensation, each credit shall be accounted for based on the earnings options selected by the Participant on the Compensation Deferral Election. In the case of Stock Option Gain Compensation, the credit shall be based on the fair market value as of the stock option exercise date as defined by the stock option plan. |
(C) | Increase or Decrease to Deferral Accounts . The value of a Participants Deferral Account will increase or decrease as follows: |
(1) | CD Option . The amount of the increase or decrease for the CD Option for a particular calendar month is calculated based on the interest rate as of the first business day of that month |
4
for a certificate of deposit in such denomination and for such duration as is determined by the Plan Administrator. |
(2) | Fund Options . The amount of the increase or decrease for a Fund Option is based on the performance for the selected Fund Option. |
(3) | Common Stock Earnings Option . The amount of the increase or decrease for the Common Stock Earnings Option is based on the performance of the Common Stock including dividends. Common Stock dividend equivalents will be credited under the Common Stock Earnings Option at the same time and same rate as dividends are paid on shares of Common Stock. |
8. Distributions . Payment of Deferral Accounts shall be made in accordance to the Participants Deferral Elections, subject to the following:
(A) | Lump Sum or Installment Distributions . A Participant must elect to receive distribution of the Participants Deferral Accounts in either a lump sum or in annual installments over a period of years up to ten. |
(B) | Timing of Distribution . A Participant must designate on the Deferral Election the year that distribution from the Participants Deferral Account shall be made. For purposes of Stock Option Gain Deferral Elections (made prior to January 1, 2004), the Participant may not elect to receive the distribution earlier than twelve (12) months after the date on which the option is exercised. In all events, however, distribution shall commence as soon as practicable after the March 1 immediately following the date the Participant ceases to be employed by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company. A Participant who is actively employed by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company shall be permitted to make a one time re-deferral election to push back the timing of distribution of a particular Deferral Year by selecting a new distribution year that is at least three (3) years beyond the originally elected distribution year and by completing an election form in a form provided by the Plan Administrator at least twelve (12) months prior to the originally elected distribution year. If a Participant re-defers by electing a new distribution year for a particular Deferral Year, that Deferral Year Account shall become subject to the terms of the Plan in effect at the time of the new distribution election including the early withdrawal provisions. An election of a new distribution year shall not change the form of distribution (lump sum or installments) originally selected on the Participants Deferral Election. |
(C) | Accounts Less Than $25,000 . Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the aggregate value of the Participants Deferral Accounts attributable to (a) Deferral Elections made for Deferral Years commencing on or after January 1, 2000, (b) Deferral Elections made on July 1, 1999 by transferred BRP Participants, and (c) any Prior Deferral Elections that became subject to the terms of this Plan in accordance with Section 8 (E), is less than $25,000 at the end of the month in which the Participants employment terminates, such Deferral Accounts shall be paid in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the March 1 immediately following the Participants termination date. |
(D) | Upon Death . If a Participant dies before receiving all payments under the Plan, payment of the balance in the Participants Deferral Accounts shall be made to the Participants designated beneficiary in the forms of distribution elected by the Participant on the Participants Deferral Elections as soon as practicable after the March 1 following the date of the Participants death. To be valid, a beneficiary designation must be in writing and the written designation must have been delivered to and accepted by the Plan Administrator prior to the Participants death. |
If at the time of the Participants death there is not on file a fully effective beneficiary designation form, or if the designated beneficiary did not survive the Participant, the person or persons surviving at the time of the Participants death in the first of the following classes of beneficiaries in |
5
which there is a survivor, shall be entitled to receive the balance of the Participants Deferral Accounts. If a person in the class surviving dies before receiving the balance (or the persons share of the balance in case of more than one person in the class) of the Participants Deferral Accounts, that persons right to receive the Participants Deferral Accounts will lapse and the determination of who will be entitled to receive the Participants Deferral Accounts will be determined as if that person predeceased the Participant. |
(a) | Participants surviving spouse; |
(b) | Equally to the Participants children, except that if any of the Participants children predecease the Participant but leave descendants surviving, such descendants shall take by right of representation the share their parent would have taken if living; |
(c) | Participants surviving parents equally; |
(d) | Participants surviving brothers and sisters equally; or |
(e) | Representative of the Participants estate. |
(E) | Transitional Rule . Notwithstanding the foregoing distribution rules contained in this Section 8, a Participant who was employed by the Company on January 1, 2000 and who entered into a Deferral Election for a Deferral Year prior to January 1, 2000 or had a Transferred Account (collectively Prior Deferral Elections) and who had not commenced distribution of such Prior Deferral Election prior to January 1, 2000, was given a one-time opportunity effective January 1, 2000 to elect to change the method of distribution (lump sum versus installments) or to postpone the distribution commencement date for a Prior Deferral Election for a period of at least one year from the original distribution commencement date selected on the Prior Deferral Election. To be effective, such change had to be submitted to the Plan Administrator on a form provided by the Plan Administrator by December 31, 1999, or if earlier, a date required by the Plan Administrator. If the change was not submitted by December 31, 1999, the method and timing of distribution elected on the Prior Deferral Election remained in effect. If the Participant elected to make a change to a Prior Deferral Election, the amount deferred under the Prior Deferral Election and all earnings attributable to that Prior Deferral Election became subject to the distribution rules contained in this Section 8 and the timing and form of distribution selected on the Prior Deferral Election was no longer applicable with respect to distributions on account of termination of employment, retirement or disability. For purposes of a Prior Deferral Election made under this Plan, retirement means the Participants termination of employment with the Company after the Participants attainment of regular or early retirement as defined in Section 6.1 or 6.2 of the Norwest Corporation Pension Plan in effect on June 30, 1999. Also, for purposes of Prior Deferral Elections made under this Plan, disability means the Participants total disability as described in the Wells Fargo & Company Long-Term Disability Plan, as amended from time to time. |
(F) | Form of Distributions . All distributions from Deferral Accounts shall be payable as follows: |
(1) | in cash for all Deferral Accounts in an earnings option other than the Common Stock Earnings Option; or |
(2) | in shares of Common Stock for the portion of the Deferral Accounts in the Common Stock Earnings Option. |
(G) | Valuation of Deferral Accounts for Distribution . |
(1) | The amount of the distribution in cash and/or Common Stock shall be determined based on the Participants Deferral Account balance (and, if applicable, the price of Common Stock) as of the close of business on March 1 of the year of distribution (or the next following business day |
6
if March 1 is not a business day). The amount of the distribution in cash and/or Common Stock as of any other date on which a distribution is made shall be determined based on the Participants Deferral Account balance (and, if applicable, the price of Common Stock) as of the close of business on the last business day of the month in which the event which triggers distribution occurs. Earnings adjustments to amounts that have been valued for distribution shall cease as of the date used to value such amounts. |
(2) | The amount of each installment payment will be based on the value of the Participants Deferral Account as of the close of business on March 1 of the year of the installment payment (or the next following business day if March 1 is not a business day) and the number of the installments remaining. The balance remaining in the Deferral Account shall continue to be adjusted based on the earnings options selected by the Participant in the Deferral Election until the valuation date used to determine the amount of the last payment. All installment payments will be made by pro rata withdrawals from each earnings option elected by the Participant. |
(H) | Early Withdrawal . Effective January 1, 2004, the Plan will not allow early withdrawals for any reason. As such, this Section 8(H) is not applicable for Deferral Accounts attributable to Deferral Years commencing on or after January 1, 2004 and to Deferral Accounts commencing prior to January 1, 2004 that were subject to a change in the time of distribution election made pursuant to Section 8(B). A Participant or beneficiary who wishes to receive payment of all or part of the Participants Deferral Account on a date earlier than that specified in the Deferral Election or in the case of a beneficiary in accordance with Section 8(D), may do so by filing with the Plan Administrator a request for early withdrawal. Such payment will be made from the earliest Deferral Year(s) in which the Participant has participated in the Plan. Partial withdrawals of a given Deferral Years deferral are not permitted. Deferral Accounts will be distributed in the order in which the accounts were established. Stock Option Gain Compensation deferrals will be distributed in the order in which the accounts were established following the distribution of all funds from the Compensation Deferrals. For the appropriate Deferral Year(s), Account accruals to date shall be disbursed completely, less a 10% early withdrawal penalty on the amount distributed. The 10% penalty assessed for early withdrawal will be permanently forfeited by the Participant and will be credited to the account of the Company. Further, the Participant shall forfeit eligibility to defer Compensation under this Plan during the two Deferral Years following the year in which the early withdrawal is made, but in no case shall an early withdrawal cause a current Deferral Election (either of Compensation or Stock Option Gain Compensation) to be suspended or canceled. In no case may a Participant or beneficiary make more than one early withdrawal per calendar year. |
9. Nonassignability . No Participant or beneficiary shall have any interest in any Accounts under this Plan that can be transferred, nor shall any Participant or beneficiary have any power to anticipate, alienate, dispose of, pledge or encumber the same while in the possession or control of the Company, nor shall the Company recognize any assignment thereof, either in whole or in part, nor shall any Account be subject to attachment, garnishment, execution following judgment or other legal process while in the possession or control of the Company. The designation of a beneficiary by a Participant does not constitute a transfer.
10. Withholding of Taxes . Distributions under this Plan shall be subject to the deduction of the amount of any federal, state, or local income taxes, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, or other taxes required to be withheld from such payments by applicable laws and regulations.
11. Unsecured Obligation . The obligation of the Company to make payments under this Plan constitutes only the unsecured (but legally enforceable) promise of the Company to make such payments. The Participant shall have no lien, prior claim or other security interest in any property of the Company. The Company is not required to establish or maintain any fund, trust or account (other than a bookkeeping account or reserve) for the purpose of funding or paying the benefits promised under this Plan. If such a fund is established, the property therein shall remain the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Company will pay the cost of this Plan out of its general assets. All references to accounts, accruals, gains, losses, income, expenses, payments, custodial funds and the like
7
are included merely for the purpose of measuring the Companys obligation to Participants in this Plan and shall not be construed to impose on the Company the obligation to create any separate fund for purposes of this Plan.
12. Trust Fund . If the Company chooses to fund credits to Participants Deferral Accounts, all cash contributed for such funding shall be held and administered in trust in accordance with the terms and provisions of a trust agreement between the Company and the appointed trustee or any duly appointed successor trustee. All Common Stock or other funds in the trust shall be held on a commingled basis and shall be subject to the claims of the general creditors of the Company. Plan Accounts shall be for bookkeeping purposes only, and the establishment of Plan Accounts shall not require segregation of trust assets.
13. No Guarantee of Employment . Participation in this Plan does not constitute a guarantee or contract of employment with the Company or any of the Companys affiliates. Such participation shall in no way interfere with any right of the Company or any affiliate to determine the duration of a Participants employment or the terms and conditions of such employment.
14. Administration . The Plan Administrator or its delegate shall have the exclusive authority and responsibility for all matters in connection with the operation and administration of the Plan. The Plan Administrators powers and duties shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (a) responsibility for the compilation and maintenance of all records necessary in connection with the Plan; (b) discretionary authority to interpret the terms of the Plan; (c) authorizing the payment of all benefits and expenses of the Plan as they become payable under the Plan; (d) authority to engage such legal, accounting and other professional services as it may deem necessary; (e) authority to adopt procedures for implementing the Plan; (f) discretionary authority to determine Participants eligibility for benefits under the Plan; (g) set limits on the percentage or amount of Compensation that may be deferred in a Deferral Year; and (h) to resolve all issues of fact and law in connection with such determinations.
15. Common Stock . Subject to adjustment below, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be credited under the Plan is 5,000,000. If the Company shall at any time increase or decrease the number of its outstanding shares of Common Stock or change in any way the rights and privileges of such shares by means of the payment of a stock dividend or any other distribution upon such shares payable in Common Stock, or through a stock split, subdivision, consolidation, combination, reclassification, or recapitalization involving the Common Stock, then the numbers, rights, and privileges of the shares issuable under the Plan shall be increased, decreased, or changed in like manner as if such shares had been issued and outstanding, fully paid, and non-assessable at the time of such occurrence.
16. Claims Procedure . The Company shall establish a claims procedure consistent with the requirements of ERISA. Such claims procedure shall provide adequate notice in writing to any Participant or Beneficiary whose claim for benefits under the Plan has been denied, setting forth the specific reasons for such denial, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant and shall afford a reasonable opportunity to a claimant whose claim for benefits has been denied for a full and fair review by the Company of the decision denying the claim.
17. Construction and Applicable Law . This Plan is intended to be construed and administered as an unfunded plan maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees as provided under ERISA. The Plan shall be construed and administered according to the laws of the State of Minnesota to the extent that such laws are not preempted by ERISA.
18. Agent for Legal Process . The Company shall be agent for service of legal process with respect to any matter concerning the Plan, unless and until the Company designates some other person as such agent.
19. Amendment and Termination . The Board of Directors of the Company or the Human Resources Committee of the Companys Board of Directors may at any time terminate, suspend, or amend this Plan in any manner; provided, however, that if necessary to maintain the availability of the exemption contained in Rule 16b-3, or any successor regulation, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for transactions pursuant to this Plan, the provisions of this Plan relating to the amount, price and timing of awards pursuant to this Plan may not be
8
amended more than once in every six months other than to comport with changes in the Internal Revenue Code or ERISA, or the rules thereunder. In the event that the Plan is terminated, the Deferral Accounts of all Participants (whether or not currently in distribution status) shall be paid in the form originally elected by the Participant to commence as soon as practicable after the March 1 following the date the Plan is terminated or shall be paid under some other method as determined by the Plan Administrator. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the President, Director of Human Resources and the Senior Vice President of Compensation and Benefits, acting singly, shall have the authority to execute a written action to amend the Plan to authorize the merger of any nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained by any acquired entity into this Plan.
20. Severability . If any provision of the Plan is determined to be illegal or invalid (in whole or in part) for any reason, or if legislative, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, court or other action is at risk of causing a provision to be interpreted so as to cause Participants in the Plan to be in constructive receipt of amounts in their Deferral Accounts for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the provision had not been included in the Plan.
9
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATION
I, Richard M. Kovacevich, certify that:
Date: November 7, 2003
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wells Fargo &
Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Richard M. Kovacevich
Richard M. Kovacevich
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(b)
CERTIFICATION
I, Howard I. Atkins, certify that:
Date: November 7, 2003
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wells Fargo &
Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Howard I. Atkins
Howard I. Atkins
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(a)
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by
I, Richard M. Kovacevich, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Wells Fargo & Company (the Company), certify that:
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wells Fargo & Company and will be retained by Wells Fargo &
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(1)
The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
/s/ Richard M. Kovacevich
Richard M. Kovacevich
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Wells Fargo & Company
November 7, 2003
Exhibit 32(b)
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by
I, Howard I. Atkins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Wells Fargo & Company (the Company), certify that:
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wells Fargo & Company and will be retained by Wells Fargo &
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(1)
The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
/s/ Howard I. Atkins
Howard I. Atkins
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Wells Fargo & Company
November 7, 2003
EXHIBIT 99(a)
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
Quarter
Nine months
ended September 30
,
ended September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
2,332
$
2,238
$
6,998
$
6,579
889
1,047
2,745
3,149
$
3,221
$
3,285
$
9,743
$
9,728
$
837
$
1,004
$
2,598
$
3,017
52
43
147
132
$
889
$
1,047
$
2,745
$
3,149
3.62
3.14
3.55
3.09
$
2,332
$
2,238
$
6,998
$
6,579
505
564
1,509
1,690
$
2,837
$
2,802
$
8,507
$
8,269
$
837
$
1,004
$
2,598
$
3,017
384
483
1,236
1,459
52
43
147
132
$
505
$
564
$
1,509
$
1,690
5.62
4.97
5.64
4.89
(1) | As defined in Item 503(d) of Regulation S-K. | |
(2) | These computations are included herein in compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. However, management believes that fixed charge ratios are not meaningful measures for the business of the Company because of two factors. First, even if there was no change in net income, the ratios would decline with an increase in the proportion of income which is tax-exempt or, conversely, they would increase with a decrease in the proportion of income which is tax-exempt. Second, even if there was no change in net income, the ratios would decline if interest income and interest expense increase by the same amount due to an increase in the level of interest rates or, conversely, they would increase if interest income and interest expense decrease by the same amount due to a decrease in the level of interest rates. |
EXHIBIT 99(b)
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
Quarter
Nine months
ended September 30
,
ended September 30
,
(in millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
$
2,332
$
2,238
$
6,998
$
6,579
889
1,047
2,745
3,149
$
3,221
$
3,285
$
9,743
$
9,728
$
1
$
1
$
3
$
3
1.49
1.55
1.53
1.55
$
1
$
2
$
5
$
5
837
1,004
2,598
3,017
52
43
147
132
889
1,047
2,745
3,149
$
890
$
1,049
$
2,750
$
3,154
3.62
3.13
3.54
3.08
$
2,332
$
2,238
$
6,998
$
6,579
505
564
1,509
1,690
$
2,837
$
2,802
$
8,507
$
8,269
$
1
$
2
$
5
$
5
837
1,004
2,598
3,017
384
483
1,236
1,459
52
43
147
132
505
564
1,509
1,690
$
506
$
566
$
1,514
$
1,695
5.61
4.95
5.62
4.88
(1) | As defined in Item 503(d) of Regulation S-K. | |
(2) | The preferred dividends were increased to amounts representing the pretax earnings that would be required to cover such dividend requirements. | |
(3) | These computations are included herein in compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. However, management believes that fixed charge ratios are not meaningful measures for the business of the Company because of two factors. First, even if there was no change in net income, the ratios would decline with an increase in the proportion of income which is tax-exempt or, conversely, they would increase with a decrease in the proportion of income which is tax-exempt. Second, even if there was no change in net income, the ratios would decline if interest income and interest expense increase by the same amount due to an increase in the level of interest rates or, conversely, they would increase if interest income and interest expense decrease by the same amount due to a decrease in the level of interest rates. |