Exhibit 13.1
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION
and
ANALYSIS
of
RESULTS
of
OPERATIONS
and
FINANCIAL CONDITION
SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate a portfolio of businesses that manufacture and sell a variety of specialty paints,
protective coatings and roofing systems, sealants and adhesives. We manage our portfolio by
organizing our businesses into two operating segments — industrial and consumer — based on the nature
of business activities; products and services; the structure of management; and the structure of
information as presented to our Board of Directors. Within each segment, individual operating
companies or groups of companies generally address common markets, utilize similar technologies,
and can share manufacturing or distribution capabilities. We evaluate the profit performance of our
segments based on earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) because interest expense is
essentially related to corporate acquisitions, as opposed to segment operations.
Industrial segment products are sold throughout North America and account for most of our
sales in Europe, South America, Asia, South Africa, Australia and the Middle East. The industrial
product line is sold primarily to distributors, contractors and to end users, such as industrial
manufacturing facilities, educational and governmental institutions, and commercial establishments.
Industrial segment products reach their markets through a combination of direct sales, sales
representative organizations, distributor sales and sales of licensees and joint ventures.
Consumer segment products are sold throughout North America to mass merchandisers, home
centers, hardware stores, paint stores, automotive supply stores and craft shops. Consumer segment
products are sold to retailers through a combination of direct sales, sales representative
organizations and distributor sales.
In addition to two operating segments, there are certain business activities, referred to as
corporate/other, that do not constitute an operating segment, including corporate headquarters and
related administrative expenses, results of our captive insurance companies, gains or losses on the
sales of certain assets and other expenses not directly associated with either operating segment.
Related assets consist primarily of investments, prepaid expenses, deferred pension assets, and
headquarters’ property and equipment. These corporate and other assets and expenses reconcile
operating segment data to total consolidated net sales, income before income taxes, identifiable
assets, capital expenditures, and depreciation and amortization.
The following table reflects the results of our operating segments consistent with our
management philosophy, and represents the information we utilize, in conjunction with various
strategic, operational and other financial performance criteria, in evaluating the performance of
our portfolio of businesses. For further information pertaining to our segments, refer to Note I,
“Segment Information,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
16
SEGMENT INFORMATION
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
| Year Ended May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial
|
$ | 1,441,548 | $ | 1,272,781 | $ | 1,117,877 | ||||||
|
Consumer
|
1,114,187 | 1,034,772 | 935,605 | |||||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
$ | 2,555,735 | $ | 2,307,553 | $ | 2,053,482 | ||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
(a)
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial Segment
|
||||||||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
(a)
|
$ | 168,578 | $ | 140,706 | $ | 122,568 | ||||||
|
Interest (Expense), Net
|
532 | 192 | 253 | |||||||||
|
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”)
(b)
|
$ | 168,046 | $ | 140,514 | $ | 122,315 | ||||||
|
Consumer Segment
|
||||||||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
(a)
|
$ | 147,601 | $ | 142,852 | $ | 131,100 | ||||||
|
Interest (Expense), Net
|
415 | 104 | (284 | ) | ||||||||
|
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”)
(b)
|
$ | 147,186 | $ | 142,748 | $ | 131,384 | ||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
||||||||||||
|
(Loss) Before Income Taxes
(a)
|
$ | (152,451 | ) (c) | $ | (65,942 | ) | $ | (205,815 | ) (c) | |||
|
Interest (Expense), Net
|
(36,325 | ) | (29,241 | ) | (26,681 | ) | ||||||
|
(Loss) Before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”)
(b)
|
$ | (116,126 | ) | $ | (36,701 | ) | $ | (179,134 | ) | |||
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
(a)
|
$ | 163,728 | $ | 217,616 | $ | 47,853 | ||||||
|
Interest (Expense), Net
|
(35,378 | ) | (28,945 | ) | (26,712 | ) | ||||||
|
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”)
(b)
|
$ | 199,106 | $ | 246,561 | $ | 74,565 | ||||||
| (a) | The presentation includes a reconciliation of Income Before Income Taxes, a measure defined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States, to EBIT. | |
| (b) | EBIT is defined as earnings before interest and taxes. We evaluate the profit performance of our segments based on income before income taxes, but also look to EBIT as a performance evaluation measure because interest expense is essentially related to corporate acquisitions, as opposed to segment operations. We believe EBIT is useful to investors for this purpose as well, using EBIT as a metric in their investment decisions. EBIT should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP, since EBIT omits the impact of interest and taxes in determining operating performance, which represent items necessary to our continued operations, given our level of indebtedness and ongoing tax obligations. Nonetheless, EBIT is a key measure expected by and useful to our fixed income investors, rating agencies and the banking community all of whom believe, and we concur, that this measure is critical to the capital markets’ analysis of our segments’ core operating performance. We also evaluate EBIT because it is clear that movements in EBIT impact our ability to attract financing. Our underwriters and bankers consistently require inclusion of this measure in offering memoranda in conjunction with any debt underwriting or bank financing. EBIT may not be indicative of our historical operating results, nor is it meant to be predictive of potential future results. | |
| (c) | The asbestos charge, reflected in Corporate/Other, relates primarily to our Bondex International, Inc. subsidiary. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RPM International Inc. and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. Preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
We continually evaluate these estimates, including those related to allowances for doubtful
accounts; inventories; allowances for recoverable taxes; useful lives of property.
plant and equipment; goodwill; environmental and other contingent liabilities; income tax valuation
allowances; pension plans; and the fair value of financial instruments. We base our estimates on
historical experience and other assumptions, which we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of our
assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions
and conditions.
We have identified the following accounting policies that are critical to our financial
statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
17
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when realized or realizable, and when earned. In general, this is when
title and risk of loss passes to the customer. Further, revenues are realizable when we have
persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been
provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is
reasonably assured. We reduce our revenues for estimated customer returns and allowances, and for
certain rebates, sales incentives, and promotions in the same period the related sales are
recorded.
Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements and Foreign Currency Transactions
Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, the functional currency of all of our
foreign subsidiaries is their local currency. We translate the amounts included in our consolidated
statements of income from our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars at weighted average exchange
rates, which we believe are fairly representative of the actual exchange rates on the dates of the
transactions. Our foreign subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars
from local currency at the actual exchange rates as of the end of each reporting date, and we
record the resulting foreign exchange translation adjustments in our consolidated balance sheets as
a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Translation adjustments will be
included in net earnings in the event of a sale or liquidation of any of our underlying foreign
investments, or in the event that we distribute the accumulated earnings of consolidated foreign
subsidiaries. If we determine that the functional currency of any of our foreign subsidiaries
should be the U.S. dollar, our financial statements would be affected. Should this occur, we would
adjust our reporting to appropriately account for such change(s).
As appropriate, we use permanently invested intercompany loans as a source of capital to
reduce exposure to foreign currency fluctuations at our foreign subsidiaries. These loans are
treated as analogous to equity for accounting purposes. Therefore, foreign exchange gains or losses
on these intercompany loans are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). If we were to
determine that the functional currency of any of our subsidiaries should be the U.S. dollar, we
would no longer record foreign exchange gains or losses on such intercompany loans.
Goodwill
We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141,
“Business Combinations,” which addresses the initial recognition and
measurement of goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. We also apply the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which requires that goodwill be
tested on an annual basis, or more frequently as impairment indicators arise. We have elected to
perform the required impairment tests, which involve the use of estimates related to the fair
market values of the business operations with which goodwill is associated, at the end of our first
quarter. Calculating the fair market value of the reporting units requires significant estimates
and assumptions by management. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units by applying
third-party market value indicators to the respective reporting unit’s annual projected earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. In applying this methodology, we rely on a
number of factors, including future business plans, actual operating results and market data. In
the event that our calculations indicate that goodwill is impaired, a fair value estimate of each
tangible and intangible asset would be established. This process would require the application of
discounted cash flows expected to be generated by each asset in addition to independent asset
appraisals, as appropriate. Cash flow estimates are based on our historical experience and our
internal business plans, and appropriate discount rates are applied. Losses, if any, resulting from
goodwill impairment tests would be reflected in operating income in our income statement.
Other Long-Lived Assets
We assess identifiable non-goodwill intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in facts and circumstances indicate the possibility that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important, which might trigger an impairment
evaluation, include the following:
| • | significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating results; | |
| • | significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets; | |
| • | significant changes in the strategy for our overall business; and | |
| • | significant negative industry or economic trends. |
Measuring a potential impairment of non-goodwill intangibles and other long-lived assets
requires various estimates and assumptions, including determining which cash flows are directly
related to the asset being evaluated, the useful life over which those cash flows will occur, their
amount and the asset’s residual value, if any. If we determine that the carrying value of these
assets may not be
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
18
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above-described indicators, any
impairment would be measured based on projected net cash flows expected from the asset(s),
including eventual disposition. The determination of impairment loss would be based on the best
information available, including internal discounted cash flows, quoted market prices when
available and independent appraisals as appropriate to determine fair value. Cash flow estimates
would be based on our historical experience and our internal business plans, with appropriate
discount rates applied. We have not incurred any impairment loss to date.
Deferred Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of
deferred income taxes using the liability method. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect
of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and certain changes in valuation
allowances. We provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets if, based on available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized.
In determining the adequacy of the valuation allowance, management considers cumulative and
anticipated amounts of domestic and international earnings or losses, anticipated amounts of
foreign source income, as well as the anticipated taxable income resulting from the reversal of
future taxable temporary differences.
We intend to maintain the recorded valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence
(for example, cumulative positive foreign earnings or additional foreign source income) exists to
support a reversal of the tax valuation allowances.
Contingencies
We are party to claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including the
various asbestos-related suits discussed herein and in Note H to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Although we cannot precisely predict the amount of any liability that may ultimately
arise with respect to any of these matters, we record provisions when we consider the liability
probable and reasonably estimable. The provisions are based on historical experience and legal
advice, are reviewed quarterly and are adjusted according to developments. Estimating probable
losses requires analysis of multiple forecasted factors that often depend on judgments about
potential actions by third
parties such as regulators, courts and state and federal legislatures. Changes in the amount of the
provisions affect our consolidated statements of income. Due to the inherent uncertainties in the
loss reserve estimation process, we are currently unable to estimate an additional range of loss in
excess of our accruals. We may incur asbestos costs in addition to any amounts reserved, which may
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our environmental-related accruals are similarly established and/or adjusted as information
becomes available upon which costs can be reasonably estimated. Here again, actual costs may vary
from these estimates because of the inherent uncertainties involved, including the identification
of new sites and the development of new information about contamination. Certain sites are still
being investigated and, therefore, we have been unable to fully evaluate the ultimate cost for
those sites. As a result, reserves have not been taken for certain of these sites and costs may
ultimately exceed existing reserves for other sites. We have received indemnities for potential
environmental issues from purchasers of certain of our properties and businesses and from sellers
of properties or businesses we have acquired. We have also purchased insurance to cover potential
environmental liabilities at certain sites. If the indemnifying or insuring party fails to, or
becomes unable to, fulfill its obligations under those agreements or policies, we may incur
environmental costs in addition to any amounts reserved, which may have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal 2005 Compared with Fiscal 2004
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended May 31, 2005 of $2.556 billion increased 10.8 percent,
or $248.2 million, over last year’s net sales of $2.308 billion. Contributing to this improvement
over last year was the continued growth in organic sales of $187.6 million, or 8.1 percent (1.9
percent pricing), plus eight small acquisitions in their first year with us, net of one small
divestiture, supplying another 1.3 percent growth in sales, or $28.4 million. Favorable foreign
exchange rates, relating primarily to the euro ($16.3 million) and the Canadian dollar ($12.0
million), provided the remaining 1.4 percent, or $32.2 million, of the growth in sales over last
year.
Industrial segment net sales grew 13.3 percent to $1.442 billion from last year’s $1.273
billion, comprising 56.0 percent of the current year’s consolidated net sales. This segment’s net
sales growth comes primarily from
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
19
organic sales growth of 9.4 percent (1.3 percent pricing), another 1.9 percent from favorable
foreign exchange differences, and six small acquisitions, net of the one small divestiture, added
the remaining 2.0 percent of growth to industrial sales. There were notable organic sales
improvements among powder coatings, corrosion control coatings, roofing, including services, and in
construction sealants, admixtures and exterior insulating finishes, with much of this latter growth
related to increased U.S. commercial construction activity. The demand for most of our industrial
product lines has increased as the economy in general, and the industrial sector in particular,
have improved. We continue to secure new business and grow market share among our industrial
segment operations.
Consumer segment net sales grew 7.7 percent to $1.114 billion from last year’s $1.035 billion,
comprising 44.0 percent of consolidated net sales. Organic sales growth added 6.6 percent (2.6
percent pricing) to the consumer segment sales total, in addition to 0.8 percent from favorable
foreign exchange differences. Two small bolt-on product line acquisitions provided the remaining
0.3 percent of sales growth. There were notable organic sales improvements among wood care
products, primer-sealers, caulks and sealants and small-project paints and coatings. This strong
organic growth is the result of fairly steady retail demand by the consumer throughout 2005,
coupled with continuous product development among our businesses.
Gross Profit Margin
Consolidated gross profit margin of 43.3 percent of net sales for 2005
declined from 44.7 percent a year ago. Continued higher costs of raw materials, particularly
petroleum-based, impacted this margin by approximately 260 basis points (“bps”)(2.6%), and,
combined with a lower-margin mix of sales among product lines and services, more than offset margin
benefits generated primarily from the leverage of higher organic sales volume and price increases
(170 bps) implemented by our businesses.
Industrial segment gross profit margin for 2005 declined to 44.8 percent of net sales from
45.7 percent last year. The principal factors contributing to the decline in gross margins in this
segment were continued higher raw material costs, which impacted margins by approximately 170 bps,
partly offset by price increases of approximately 120 bps, and a lower-margin mix of sales.
Consumer segment gross profit margin for the year declined to 41.3 percent of net sales from
43.4 percent last year. There was approximately 370 bps of negative margin impact from higher raw
material and packaging costs in this segment, plus certain changes in the mix of sales this year
which exceeded the 240 bps benefit from price increases implemented during 2005 plus margin
leverage from the higher organic sales volume.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
(“SG&A”)
Consolidated SG&A expense levels
improved 150 bps to 32.5 percent of net sales compared with 34.0 percent a year ago. The leverage
of organic sales growth over last year was the primary contributing factor to the improvement in
this category. The higher cost of fuel, which contributed to higher distribution costs over last
year (30 bps), this year’s adoption of SFAS No. 123 (refer to Notes A and D), in combination with
the expensing of initial grants under the 2004 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus
Plan”)(20 bps), increased compensation and other growth-related investments partially offset these
gains.
Industrial segment SG&A improved by 150 bps to 33.2 percent of net sales in 2005 from 34.7
percent a year ago. The main contributors to SG&A improvement were the leverage of organic sales
growth along with cost containment and other savings programs. These improvements were partially
offset by higher distribution costs (30 bps), increased compensation (50 bps) and other
growth-related investments.
Consumer segment SG&A improved by 160 bps to 28.1 percent of net sales for the year compared
with 29.7 percent a year ago. This segment’s organic growth in sales over last year also provided
leverage benefits along with continued cost containment and other savings programs. Partly
offsetting these benefits were increased compensation and other growth-related investments made in
this segment, in addition to increased fuel-related distribution costs (30 bps).
Corporate/Other costs increased during this year to $38.1 million from $36.7 million last
year. Generally lower insurance costs (approximately $3.1 million) and certain other expense
reductions partly offset higher costs related to the combination of this year’s adoption of SFAS
No. 123 and the expensing of initial grants under the Omnibus Plan, approximating $3.8 million, as
well as higher corporate governance costs, principally start-up costs related to Sarbanes-Oxley
Section 404 compliance, approximating $2.0 million.
License fee and joint venture income of $0.6 million for the year ended May 31, 2005 and $0.7
million for the year ended May 31, 2004, is reflected as a reduction of consolidated SG&A expenses.
We recorded total net periodic pension expense of $14.5 million and $15.9 million for the
years ended May 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Additionally, we recorded net periodic
postretirement expense of $1.5 million and $1.2
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
20
million for the years ended May 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decreased pension expense
of $1.4 million was largely attributable to a net improvement in the expected return on plan
assets, approximating $3.3 million, combined with decreased net actuarial losses recognized, which
positively impacted year-over-year expense by approximately $0.9 million. Offsetting those benefits
were increased pension service and interest cost totaling approximately $2.8 million. A change of
0.25% in the discount rate or expected return on plan assets assumptions would result in $0.9
million and $0.4 million higher pension expense, respectively. The assumptions and estimates used
to determine the discount rate and expected return on plan assets are more fully described in Note
F, “Pension Plans,” and Note G, “Postretirement Health Care Benefits,” to our Consolidated
Financial Statements. We expect that pension expense will fluctuate on a year-to-year basis
depending upon the performance of plan assets, but such changes are not expected to be material as
a percent of income before income taxes.
Asbestos Charges
Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries, principally Bondex International,
Inc. (Bondex), along with many other U.S. companies, are and have been involved in a large number
of asbestos-related suits filed primarily in state courts during the past two decades with a vast
majority of current claims pending in five states – Illinois, Ohio, Mississippi, Texas and Florida.
These suits principally allege personal injury resulting from exposure to asbestos-containing
products previously manufactured by the Company’s subsidiaries. The alleged claims relate primarily
to products that Bondex or its predecessors sold through 1977. In many cases, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that
they have suffered any compensable loss as a result of such exposure or that injuries incurred
resulted from exposure to Bondex products.
The rate at which plaintiffs filed asbestos-related suits against the Company’s subsidiaries,
particularly Bondex, has increased since the fourth fiscal quarter of 2002, influenced by the
bankruptcy filings of numerous other defendants in asbestos-related litigation. Based on the
significant increase in asbestos claims activity, which in many cases disproportionately increased
Bondex’s exposure in joint and several liability law states, our third-party insurance was depleted
within the first fiscal quarter of 2004, as previously reported. Our third-party insurers
historically had been responsible, under various cost-sharing arrangements, for the payment of
approximately 90% of the indemnity and defense costs associated with our asbestos litigation. Prior
to this sudden precipitous increase in loss rates, the combination of book
loss reserves and insurance coverage was expected to adequately cover asbestos claims for the
foreseeable future. We have reserved our rights with respect to various of our third-party
insurers’ claims of exhaustion, and in late calendar 2002 commenced reviewing our known insurance
policies to determine whether other insurance limits may be available to cover our asbestos
liabilities.
As a result of this examination and as previously disclosed, certain of our subsidiaries filed
a complaint for declaratory judgment, breach of contract and bad faith against various third-party
insurers, challenging their assertion that their policies covering asbestos-related claims have
been exhausted. Since the July 3, 2003 filing in Ohio, this action was combined with a related case
and, pursuant to a case management order, the parties are to complete fact discovery by March 31,
2006 and dispositive motions and expert discovery by September 1, 2006. A trial date of January 29,
2007 has been set; however, it is possible that this and other dates may be modified as the
coverage case progresses.
We are unable at the present time to predict the timing or ultimate outcome of this insurance
coverage litigation. Consequently, we are unable to predict whether, or to what extent, any
additional insurance may be available to cover a portion of our subsidiaries’ asbestos liabilities.
We have not included any potential benefits from this litigation either in our financial statements
or in calculating our asbestos reserve. Our wholly-owned captive insurance companies have not
provided any insurance or re-insurance coverage for any of our subsidiaries’ asbestos-related
claims.
During 2003 and early fiscal 2004, new state liability laws were enacted in three states
(Mississippi, Ohio and Texas) where at that time more than 80% of the claims against Bondex were
pending. Effective dates for the last two of the law changes were April 8, 2003 and July 1, 2003.
The changes generally provided for liability to be determined on a “proportional cause” basis,
thereby limiting Bondex’s responsibility to only its share of the alleged asbestos exposure. During
the third and fourth fiscal quarters of 2004, two of the three previously mentioned states that
adopted “proportional cause” liability in 2003 passed additional legislation impacting medical
criteria and product identification in asbestos-related litigation. In 2005, additional states,
including Florida and Georgia have adopted various medical criteria-based asbestos legislation.
While there have been some changes in the type of claims filed in certain of these states, the
ultimate influence these law changes may have on future claims activity and settlement
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
21
values is not known at this time. Claims in Mississippi, Ohio and Texas at the fiscal year
ended May 31, 2005, coupled with the non-malignancy filings in Florida, currently comprise
approximately 80% of the aggregate claims filed against Bondex.
At the end of 2002 and through the third fiscal quarter of 2003, Bondex had concluded it was
not possible to estimate the cost of disposing all of the asbestos-related claims that might be
filed against Bondex in the future due to a number of reasons, including its lack of sufficient
comparable loss history from which to assess either the number or value of any future
asbestos-related claims. As previously disclosed, during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2003, Bondex
retained a consulting firm to assist in analyzing its loss history data, to evaluate whether it
would be possible to estimate the cost of disposing pending claims in light of both past and recent
loss history, and to assist in determining whether future asbestos-related claims reasonably
expected to be filed against Bondex were measurable, given recent changes in various state laws and
the prospect of potential federal asbestos-related legislation.
Bondex provided the consultants with all relevant data regarding asbestos-related claims filed
against Bondex through May 31, 2003. Management, with the consultants’ input, concluded that it was
not possible to currently estimate the full range of the cost of resolving all future
asbestos-related claims against Bondex. Estimating the future cost of asbestos-related contingent
liabilities was and continues to be subject to many uncertainties, including (i) the ultimate
number of claims filed; (ii) the cost of resolving both current known and future unknown claims;
(iii) the amount of insurance, if any, available to cover such claims, including the outcome of
coverage litigation against the subsidiaries’ third party insurers; (iv) future earnings and cash
flow of the Company’s subsidiaries; (v) the impact of bankruptcies of other companies whose share
of liability may be imposed on the Company’s subsidiaries under certain state liability laws; (vi)
the unpredictable aspects of the litigation process including a changing trial docket and the
jurisdictions in which trials are scheduled; (vii) the outcome of any such trials including
judgments or jury verdicts, as a result of our more aggressive defense posture which includes
taking selective cases to verdict; (viii) the lack of specific information in many cases concerning
exposure to the subsidiaries’ products and the claimants’ diseases; (ix) potential changes in
applicable federal and/or state law; and (x) the potential impact of various proposed structured
settlement transactions or subsidiary bankruptcies by other
companies, some of which are the subject of federal appellate court review, the outcome of which
could materially affect any future asbestos-related liability estimates. In addition, during both
calendar years 2003 and 2005, passage by the United States Senate Judiciary Committee of proposed
legislation to establish a trust fund to pay future asbestos-related claims and remove such cases
from federal and state courts with industry and insurers funding the trust continues to be a
significant variable that has made it increasingly difficult to predict with certainty the full
exposure of future, unknown asbestos-related claims. The ongoing prospect of federal trust fund
legislation is expected to continue to be a significant variable in assessing our future
asbestos-related liabilities.
Based on the foregoing considerations, at May 31, 2003, we concluded that we could not fully
estimate the liability that would result from all future asbestos claims. We established a reserve
for those pending cases that had progressed to a stage where the cost to dispose of these cases
could, at the time, reasonably be estimated, as well as a $51.2 million provision for future
unasserted claims that were estimable at May 31, 2003. The estimation of even pending cases was and
is always difficult due to the dynamic nature of asbestos litigation including the variables
discussed above. The estimated range of potential loss covering measurable known asbestos claims
and the provision for future claims that were estimable at May 31, 2003 was $140.0 million to
$145.0 million. Accordingly, we established a reserve equal to the lower end of this range of
potential loss by taking an asbestos charge to fiscal 2003 operations of $140.0 million. At the
time of the reserve, we believed that this asbestos reserve would be sufficient to cover
asbestos-related cash flow requirements over the estimated three-year life of the reserve. The
$140.0 million charge also included $15.0 million in total projected defense costs over the
estimated three-year life of the reserve. By comparison, Bondex’s share of costs (net of
then-available third-party insurance) for asbestos-related product liability was $6.7 million and
$2.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Since May 31, 2003, we have reviewed and evaluated on a quarterly basis the adequacy of our
asbestos reserve. The range of loss calculation for the $140.0 million reserve was based on an
extensive analysis of the most critical factors that influence our asbestos-related costs
including: (i) the gross number of open malignancy claims (principally mesothelioma claims) as
these claims have the most significant impact on our asbestos settlement costs; (ii) historical
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
22
and current settlement costs and dismissal rates by various categories; (iii) analysis of the
jurisdiction and governing law of the states in which these claims are pending; and (iv) outside
defense counsel’s opinions and recommendations with respect to the merits of such claims. Although
the number of open malignancy claims has remained relatively constant, subject to some quarterly
variability, since May 31, 2003 continuing through the year ended May 31, 2005, our average
settlement costs for malignancy claims have declined and dismissal rates have increased. Several
defense verdicts during the second half of fiscal 2004 further contributed to lower settlement
values and higher dismissal rates. Our defense costs, however, have increased significantly as a
result of our more aggressive defense strategy, which now includes taking selective cases to
verdict.
Based on our review of our asbestos reserve for the second quarter ended November 30, 2004, we
concluded that the $56.0 million balance of the $140.0 million reserve would not likely be
sufficient to cover our asbestos-related cash flow requirements for the remainder of the full
three-year period originally contemplated by the reserve. Accordingly, we concluded that an
increase in our existing reserve was appropriate and took an asbestos reserve adjustment of $47.0
million for the quarter ended November 30, 2004, which we believed would be sufficient to cover any
incremental cash flow requirements through fiscal 2006 not covered by the $140.0 million reserve,
as well as the additional cash flow requirements for the balance of our then-pending known claims
and anticipated higher defense costs. Approximately $32.0 million of the $47.0 million reserve
adjustment was allocated to anticipated higher future defense costs. During the third fiscal
quarter ended February 28, 2005, based on a review of our then-pending known claims, coupled with a
review of our defense costs, we concluded that an increase in our existing reserve was again
appropriate. An asbestos reserve adjustment of $15.0 million was taken for the quarter ended
February 28, 2005. With cash outlays of $21.9 million in the third quarter, our asbestos reserves
aggregated $96.3 million at February 28, 2005, which we believed would be sufficient to cover the
cash flow requirements for the balance of our then pending known claims and defense costs. Our
$15.0 million reserve increase assumed that approximately $6.1 million will be allocated to higher
future defense costs, which we expect to continue.
During the fourth quarter ended May 31, 2005, an additional $16.0 million was added to the
asbestos reserve based on management’s quarterly review of pending claims
and defense costs. With cash outlays of $11.1 million during the fourth quarter, our asbestos
reserves totaled $101.2 million at May 31, 2005, which we believe will be sufficient to cover the
cash flow requirements for the balance of our pending known claims, including defense costs. Of the
$16.0 million reserve increase, approximately $15.8 million is expected to be allocated to
anticipated higher future defense costs, which we expect to continue. As previously disclosed, as
we review our asbestos reserve each quarter, we will make appropriate adjustments to the reserve
based on our most recent experience to ensure that it is sufficient to cover the anticipated
settlement and defense costs associated with our then-pending, known claims. We will continue to
evaluate the appropriateness of estimating the value of any potential future unknown asbestos
claims and at such time as we are able to quantify such future exposure, we will establish a
reserve for such unknown future claims.
We recognize that future facts, events and legislation, both state and/or federal, may alter
our estimates of both pending and future claims. We cannot estimate possible liabilities in excess
of those accrued because we cannot predict the number of additional claims that may be filed in the
future, the grounds for such claims, the potential settlement values associated with any such
future claims, the ultimate resolution of such claims, the full impact of the state law changes
enumerated above or the effect of pending federal trust fund legislation on future asbestos claims.
Subject to the foregoing variables, including the timing and impact of such variables and the
increase in the asbestos reserve, we believe that our asbestos reserves are sufficient to cover
asbestos-related cash flow requirements for the current inventory of our known claims. It is,
however, reasonably possible that our actual costs for claims could differ from current estimates
but, based upon information presently available, such costs are not expected to have a material
effect on our competitive or financial position or our ongoing operations. As previously disclosed,
however, our existing reserve will not presently cover the costs of future unknown claims and,
therefore, additional reserves will be required in future periods for any such future claims. Any
such future reserve increases, when taken, could have a material impact on our results in such
period.
The Company will continue to evaluate its asbestos-related loss exposure each quarter and
review the adequacy of its reserve and the related cash flow implications in light of our most
recent actual claims experience, the impact of state law changes and the evolving nature of federal
legislative efforts to address asbestos litigation. We will con-
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
23
tinue to explore all feasible alternatives available to resolve our asbestos-related exposure
in a manner consistent with the best interests of our stockholders.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense was $6.4 million higher this year than a year ago.
Interest rates overall averaged 4.9 percent during the year, compared with 4.2 percent a year ago,
accounting for $6.8 million of the interest cost increase. Additional debt outstanding during the
past year cost approximately $1.6 million more during the year. These increases are primarily due
to our debt refinancings (refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section) during the past 18
months, including the $200 million 6.25% Senior Notes issued in December 2003 and the $200 million
4.45% Senior Unsecured Notes issued in September 2004. Higher average net borrowings this year of
approximately $24.0 million, associated with recent acquisitions, added $0.8 million of interest
cost, while investment income performance improved year-over-year, providing $2.8 million of
additional income.
Income Before Income Taxes (“IBT”)
Consolidated IBT for this year of $163.7 million compares
with $217.6 million last year, with $78.0 million of this decline resulting from the asbestos
charges taken during this fiscal year. Excluding the charges, IBT for this year would have been an
adjusted $241.7 million, or ahead by $24.1 million, or
11.1 percent, from last year’s $217.6 million, resulting in
margins at 9.5 and 9.4 percent of sales for 2005 and 2004,
respectively. This reflects the combined positive impacts
from the higher organic sales volume, cost controls, productivity
improvements and pricing initiatives, offsetting the
approximate 260 bps impact of higher material costs, plus
higher fuel-related distribution costs, the continuation of
growth-related investments this year in both operating
segments and higher interest expense.
Industrial segment IBT grew by $27.9 million, or 19.8 percent, to $168.6 million, or 11.7
percent of sales, from last year’s $140.7 million, or 11.1 percent of sales, mainly from the higher
organic sales volume. Consumer segment IBT grew by $4.7 million, or 3.3 percent, to $147.6 million,
or
13.2 percent of sales, from last year’s $142.9 million, or 13.8
percent of sales, with the margin decline mainly from
higher material costs more than offsetting pricing increases
and organic sales growth leverage in this segment. Combined,
operating IBT grew to $316.2 million, or 12.4 percent
of sales, ahead $32.6 million, or 11.5 percent, over 2004’s
$283.6 million, or 12.3% of sales.
For a reconciliation of IBT to earnings before interest and taxes, see the Segment Information
table located on page 17 of this Annual Report.
Income Tax Rate
The effective income tax rate was 35.8% for 2005 compared to an effective
income tax rate of 34.8% for 2004. The effective income tax rate for 2005 reflects the impact of
the $78 million asbestos liability charges taken during the year. Excluding the asbestos charges,
the adjusted effective income tax rate for 2005 would have been 36.1%. This increase in the
adjusted effective income tax rate, excluding the asbestos charges, is principally due to an
increase in tax valuation allowances recorded in 2005, this year’s reduction in the
extraterritorial income exclusion benefit, changes in the jurisdictional mix of income and the
impact of our foreign operations.
As of May 31, 2005, we have determined, based on the available evidence, that it is uncertain
whether we will be able to recognize certain deferred tax assets. Therefore, in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,”
we intend to maintain the tax valuation allowances recorded at May 31, 2005 for certain deferred
tax assets until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of the tax valuation
allowances, such as cumulative positive foreign earnings or additional foreign source income.
The valuation allowances relate to U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards, certain
foreign net operating losses and net foreign deferred tax assets recorded in purchase accounting.
The most significant portion of the valuation allowance is associated with deferred tax assets
recorded in purchase accounting. Any reversal of the valuation allowance that was recorded in
purchase accounting would reduce goodwill. A reduction of the valuation allowance of $0.5 million
was accordingly allocated to goodwill during 2005.
Net Income
Net income for this year of $105.0 million compares with last year’s $141.9
million, reflecting the $49.5 million after-tax cost of the asbestos liability charges taken during
this fiscal year. Excluding the charges, this year’s adjusted net income would have been $154.5
million, ahead $12.6 million, or 8.9 percent, from last year. The margin on sales would have been
an adjusted 6.0 and 6.1 percent of sales for 2005 and 2004, respectively, despite the net impact
from higher material costs. Similarly, diluted earnings per common share would have increased to an
adjusted $1.25, or by 7.8 percent, from $1.16 a year ago. As a result of our adoption of EITF 04-8,
as outlined in Notes A and D, diluted earnings per share for the years ended May 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 have been restated to include the 8,034,355 shares issuable upon conversion of our
contingently convertible debt.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
24
FISCAL 2004 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 2003
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended May 31, 2004 of $2.308 billion increased 12.4%, or
approximately $254 million, over 2003 net sales of $2.053 billion. This growth was attributed
primarily to a solid increase in organic sales of 6.6%, or $135 million, plus eleven acquisitions,
which contributed 3.4%, or $69 million, to sales growth. Favorable foreign exchange rates provided
the additional 2.4%, or $50 million, of increased sales over 2003, the majority of which related to
the Canadian dollar for $21 million and the euro for $23 million.
Industrial segment net sales for 2004 amounted to 55.0% of consolidated net sales, growing
13.9%, or $155 million, to $1.273 billion from $1.118 billion in 2003. This segment’s net sales
growth came from organic sales growth of 5.7%, or $63 million; another 3.1%, or $35 million, from
net favorable foreign exchange differences; and seven product line acquisitions, which added the
remaining $57 million, or 5.1%, to industrial sales over 2003.
Consumer segment net sales amounted to 45.0% of consolidated net sales, growing 10.6%, or $99
million, to $1.035 billion from $936 million in 2003. Growth in organic sales amounted to 7.7%, or
$72 million, while another 1.6%, or $14 million, of sales growth came from favorable foreign
exchange differences. Also contributing to growth in this segment year over year was the addition
of four acquisitions, which added the remaining 1.3%, or $13 million, of sales growth.
Gross Profit Margin
Consolidated gross profit margin of 44.7% of sales for 2004 compares with
44.8% for 2003. This slight decline in margin was caused by higher raw material and packaging
costs, which negatively impacted 2004 gross margin by 0.8% of sales, or 80 bps. Adding
approximately 70 bps to the gross margin was the combination of certain procurement benefits from
the weaker dollar, mainly against the Canadian dollar, and productivity gains. We also realized
certain supplier rebates and generally higher margins from acquisitions, which offset lower-margin
roofing services sales.
The industrial segment gross profit margin held steady at 45.7% of sales in both years,
despite higher raw material and packaging costs, which negatively impacted 2004 gross margin by 30
bps. The procurement benefits from the weaker dollar, generally higher margins from acquisitions
and productivity gains, which added 80 bps, more than offset the impact of lower-margin roofing
services sales.
The consumer segment gross profit margin declined slightly, to 43.4% of net sales in 2004 from
43.7% in 2003. Higher raw material and packaging costs negatively influenced 2004 gross margins by 140 bps. Cost benefits from productivity gains, supplier rebates and
procurement benefits from the weaker dollar combined to nearly offset raw material and packaging
cost issues.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)
Consolidated SG&A expense levels for
2004 improved to 34.0% of net sales from 34.3% in 2003. Primary additions to the SG&A percentage
year over year were marketing and related investments to support continued growth, including 2004’s
establishment of our European development office; higher pension costs (refer to Note F); and
higher insurance, legal and other costs related to corporate governance. The primary reductions to
the SG&A percentage were the benefits of lower cost-structure acquisitions and our fast-growing
roofing services sales, along with the leverage from the growth in organic sales against fixed
costs. These combined reductions reduced the 2004 SG&A percentage from 2003 by approximately 140
bps.
Industrial segment SG&A at 34.7% of net sales during 2004 compares with 34.8% in 2003. This
reduction in percentage of sales reflected growth in roofing services sales that require much lower
SG&A support. Excluding those sales, SG&A expenses would have been 36.9% and 36.3% of net sales in
2004 and 2003, respectively. Primary additions to the SG&A percentage year over year were higher
legal costs principally associated with Dryvit EIFS (refer to Note H), marketing and related
investments to support continued growth, and higher pension costs, which combined to add 120 bps to
cost levels. The offset came from leverage from organic sales growth against fixed costs in this
category.
Consumer segment SG&A expense at 29.7% of net sales compares to 29.6% in 2003. Primary
additions to the SG&A percentage year over year were marketing and related investments to support
continued growth and higher pension and legal costs totaling just over 100 bps. These increases
were essentially neutralized by volume leverage from organic sales growth against the fixed cost
portion of SG&A.
Corporate/Other costs decreased in 2004 to $36.7 million from $39.1 million in 2003. Product
liability costs of $5.7 million were accrued for in 2003, associated with our asbestos exposure,
versus none in 2004, as a result of the asbestos charge taken in 2003, estimated to cover
approximately three years’ worth of related costs at that time (refer to Note H). Offsetting this
expense reduction were higher insurance and other costs, totaling $3.9 million, related primarily
to corporate governance issues affecting essentially all U.S. publicly held companies, including
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
25
We recorded total net periodic pension cost of $15.9 million and $9.9 million for the
years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Additionally, net periodic postretirement health
care benefits for 2004 and 2003 amounted to $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The $6.0
million increase in net periodic pension cost was largely attributable to increased net actuarial
losses recognized, which negatively impacted year over year expense by approximately $2.5 million.
The remaining difference relates primarily to increased pension service and interest cost for $1.5
million and $1.9 million, respectively. A change of 0.25% in the discount rate or expected return
on plan assets assumption would have resulted in $0.9 million and $0.4 million higher pension
expense, respectively. The assumptions and estimates used to determine the discount rate and
expected return on plan assets are more fully described in Note F, “Pension Plans,” and Note G,
“Postretirement Health Care Benefits,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Asbestos Charge
As described above and in Note H to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries, principally Bondex, along with many other U.S. companies,
are and have been involved in asbestos-related suits filed primarily in state courts during the
past two decades. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003, we recorded an asbestos charge of
$140.0 million for measurable and known claims, which included a $51.2 million provision for future
claims estimable as of May 31, 2003. We believed then that this reserve would be sufficient to
cover our asbestos-related cash flow requirements over the estimated three-year life of the
reserve. The $140.0 million charge also included $15.0 million in total projected defense costs
over the estimated three-year life of the reserve.
Additionally, Bondex’s share of costs (net of then-available third-party insurance) for
asbestos-related product liability claims was $6.7 million for the year ended May 31, 2003. In
fiscal 2004, Bondex’s asbestos-related cash payments, net of insurance contributions, amounted to
$54.0 million and were charged against the balance sheet reserve established in 2003.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased by $2.2 million in 2004. Debt refinancings
effectively raised our interest rates year over year, averaging 4.2% in 2004 compared with 3.8% in
2003, costing an additional $2.8 million in interest expense in 2004. Interest costs associated
with financing acquisitions added $1.6 million of interest expense in 2004. Net interest expense
was reduced by greater investment income, of approximately $0.9 million during 2004, while debt
repayments, averaging approximately $34 million during the year, saved $1.3 million in interest
cost.
Since our issuances of 2.75% Senior Convertible Notes in May 2003 and 6.25% Senior Notes in
December 2003 (refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section), the variable portion of our
total debt structure was down to approximately 20-25% at the end of 2004.
Income Before Income Taxes (“IBT”)
Consolidated IBT in 2004 of $217.6 million compared with
$47.9 million during fiscal 2003, with $140.0 million of this difference representing the asbestos
liability charge taken in 2003. Excluding the charge, 2004 IBT would have been ahead of 2003
proforma IBT of $187.9 million by $29.7 million, or 15.8%.
Industrial segment IBT grew $18.1 million, or 14.8%, on 13.9% sales growth, to 11.1% of net
sales in 2004 compared with 11.0% of sales during fiscal 2003. Consumer segment IBT grew $11.8
million, or 9.0%, on 10.6% sales growth to 13.8% of net sales in 2004 compared with 14.0% of net
sales during fiscal 2003. This combined operating IBT improvement totaling $29.9 million, an 11.8%
increase on 12.4% sales growth, was generally the result of the growth in sales volume, including
accretive acquisitions, in addition to productivity gains, offset by the 80 bps impact of higher
raw material and packaging costs during 2004.
For a reconciliation of IBT to earnings before interest and taxes see the segment information
table located on page 17 of this Annual Report.
Income Tax Rate
The effective income tax rate was 34.8% for 2004 compared to an effective
income tax rate of 26.2% for 2003. The effective income tax rate for 2003 reflects the impact of the
$140 million asbestos liability charge. Excluding the asbestos charge, the adjusted effective tax
rate for 2003 would have been 34.6%. This increase in the effective tax rate, excluding the
asbestos charge, was principally due to slight changes in the 2004 jurisdictional mix of income.
Net Income
Net income of $141.9 million for 2004 increased $106.6 million over 2003 net income
of $35.3 million, and 2004 diluted earnings per common share of $1.16 increased $0.86 per share
compared with 2003 of $0.30 per share. Excluding the 2003 asbestos charge for comparability, 2004
net income grew $19.1 million, or 15.5%, from 2003 adjusted net income of $122.8 million, diluted
earnings per common share increased by $0.10 per share, or 9.4%, to $1.16 from an adjusted $1.06 in
2003, and margin on sales of 6.1% in 2004 improved from an adjusted 6.0% in 2003.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating Activities
Operating activities generated positive cash flow of $157.4 million during fiscal 2005
compared with $154.0 million generated during 2004, a net increase of 2.2% or
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
26
$3.4 million. Factoring out the after-tax asbestos-related cash payments of $42.8 and $33.7
million, respectively, operating activities generated positive cash flow of $200.2 million in
fiscal 2005 compared with $187.7 million during the prior year, up $12.5 million or 6.7%. During
fiscal 2005 net income was affected by $78.0 million ($49.5 million after tax) in charges for
asbestos-related liabilities, which had no effect on cash flow. Fiscal 2005 adjusted net income of
$154.5 million, excluding the asbestos charges, represents a $12.6 million increase over 2004 net
income of $141.9 million. Cash flow from operations during 2005 was positively impacted by
additional depreciation and amortization of $2.7 million versus the prior year. Trade accounts
receivable required additional cash flow of $22.1 million, principally associated with an increase
in sales versus the prior year, but with a favorable reduction of 0.5 days sales outstanding
(“DSO”) since May 31, 2004. Inventories required an additional $12.5 million of operating cash
year-over-year as a result of the increased sales volume and the associated inventory necessary to
support these levels, while our days outstanding in inventory also improved by 0.2 days since May
31, 2004, to slightly offset a portion of this cash usage. An increase in accounts payable provided
$38.4 million of additional cash year-over-year mainly as a result of the increased inventory
levels and the timing of payments.
Prepaid expenses and other current assets were a year-over-year use of cash of $27.0 million,
mostly as a result of an insurance receivable recorded during fiscal 2005. Accrued loss reserves
were a source of cash of $16.3 million year-over-year, primarily as a result of recording
additional loss reserves related to product liability. Accrued other liabilities were a use of cash
of $12.0 million year-over-year mainly as a result of net reductions in interest, advertising, and
compensation and benefit-related liabilities. Accrued other long-term liabilities were a source of
cash of $8.7 million principally as a result of the year-over-year net increases in deferred
income, deferred compensation and product warranty reserves.
Payment reductions in long-term and short-term asbestos related reserves, net of taxes, of
approximately $42.8 million in fiscal 2005 and $33.7 million in fiscal 2004 were a year-over-year
additional use of cash of $9.1 million. As disclosed in our “Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates” and our discussion on asbestos litigation (also refer to Note H), the significant
increase in asbestos claims activity and costs relating to our Bondex subsidiary caused our related
third-party insurance to be depleted during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Accordingly, we are
now funding costs previously covered by insurance with cash from operations. We anticipate that cash from operations and other sources will continue to be sufficient
to meet all asbestos-related obligations on a short-term and long-term basis.
All other remaining balance sheet changes related to cash flows from operations had a net
positive impact of $7.4 million, mostly due to timing or exchange differences.
Cash provided from operations remains our primary source of financing internal growth, with
limited use of short-term debt.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures, other than for ordinary repairs and replacements, are made to
accommodate our continued growth through improved production and distribution efficiencies and
capacity, and to enhance administration. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2005 of $55.6 million
compare with depreciation of $49.8 million. Capital spending is expected to slightly outpace our
depreciation levels for the next several years as additional capacity is brought on line to support
our continued growth. With this additional minor plant expansion, we believe there will be adequate
production capacity to meet our needs for the next several years at normal growth rates.
During fiscal 2005, there were investments totaling $15.6 million (refer to Note A) for five
acquisitions, net of proceeds from a divestiture.
Our captive insurance companies invest in marketable securities in the ordinary course of
conducting their operations, and this activity will continue (refer to Note A). Differences in
these activities between years are attributable to the timing and performance of their investments.
Financing Activities
In December 2003, we issued and sold $200 million of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2013 as a means of
refinancing. The Notes were offered to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and to
persons outside the United States under Regulation S. The entire net proceeds of $197 million from
this offering were used to repay in full the $128 million of then-outstanding borrowings under our
$500 million revolving credit facility and $69 million of the then-outstanding $72 million balance
under our asset securitization program. On July 13, 2004, we completed an exchange offer so as to
allow holders to exchange the initial notes for notes of the same principal amount registered under
the Securities Act of 1933.
On September 30, 2004, we issued and sold $200 million aggregate principal amount of 4.45%
Senior Unsecured Notes due 2009 (“4.45% Senior Notes”), which we concur-
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
27
rently swapped back to floating rate debt (refer to interest rate discussion below). The 4.45%
Senior Notes were offered to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A. We used a portion of
the net proceeds of $198.0 million from this offering to pay off our $15.0 million 6.12% Senior
Notes due 2004, which matured on November 25, 2004 and our then-outstanding $68.0 million of
commercial paper. On April 26, 2005, pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement between the
Company and the initial purchasers of the 4.45% Senior Notes, we completed an exchange offer so as
to allow holders to exchange the 4.45% Senior Notes for the same principal amount of notes
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
During November 2004, we refinanced our $500 million revolving credit facility, due July 14,
2005, with a $330 million 5-year credit facility (“Credit Agreement”), due November 19, 2009. This
new facility will be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and to provide
back-up liquidity for the issuance of commercial paper. The facility provides for borrowings in
U.S. dollars and several foreign currencies and provides sublimits for the issuance of letters of
credit in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million and a swing-line of up to $20.0 million for
short-term borrowings of less than 15 days. In addition, the size of the facility may be expanded
upon our request by up to an additional $100.0 million, thus potentially expanding the facility to
$430.0 million, subject to lender approval. As of May 31, 2005, we had no outstanding balance under
this facility.
Subsequent to year end, the Company borrowed $115.0 million under its Credit Agreement. A
portion of the borrowing, along with cash on hand, was used to repay in full the principal and
accrued interest on the Company’s $150.0 million 7.0% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2005. In addition,
a portion of the cash borrowed was used for general corporate purposes.
Our available liquidity beyond our cash balance at May 31, 2005 stood at $454.5 million (refer
to Note B). Our debt-to-capital ratio was 44.5% at May 31, 2005, up from 42% at May 31, 2004. Had
we been able to reduce our total outstanding debt by all of our cash and short-term investments
available as of May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2004, to satisfy some of our indebtedness, much of which
was earmarked at May 31, 2005 for the June 15, 2005 maturity described above, our adjusted net (of
cash) debt-to-capital ratio would have been 38.5% and 41.3%, respectively.
The following table summarizes our financial obligations and their expected maturities
at May 31, 2005 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow
in the periods indicated.
Contractual Obligations
| Payments Due In | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Contractual | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Payment Stream | 2006 | 2007-08 | 2009-10 | After 2010 | |||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
$ | 838,045 | $ | 97 | $ | 260,217 | $ | 377,697 | $ | 200,034 | ||||||||||
|
Operating lease obligations
|
79,560 | 23,765 | 32,482 | 12,429 | 10,884 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other long-term liabilities
(1)
|
144,000 | 13,200 | 22,700 | 30,900 | 77,200 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,061,605 | $ | 37,062 | $ | 315,399 | $ | 421,026 | $ | 288,118 | ||||||||||
| (1) | These amounts represent our estimated cash contributions to be made in the periods indicated for our pension and postretirement plans in the U.S. and Canada, assuming no actuarial gains or losses, assumption change or plan changes occur in any period. Projections for our other non-U.S. plans are not currently determinable. |
The condition of the U.S. dollar fluctuated throughout the year, and was moderately
weaker against other major currencies where we conduct operations at the fiscal year end over the
previous year end, causing a favorable change in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(refer to Note A) component of stockholders’ equity of $15.0 million this year versus $9.7 million
last year. This change was in addition to changes of $(1.9) million and $0.7 million related to
adjustments required for minimum pension liabilities and unrealized gain (loss) on securities,
respectively.
We maintain excellent relations with our banks and other financial institutions to provide
continual access to financing for future growth opportunities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet financings, other than the minimum leasing commitments
described in Note E. We have no subsidiaries that are not included in our financial statements, nor
do we have any interests in or relationships with any special purpose entities that are not
reflected in our financial statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
28
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates because we fund our operations through long- and short-term borrowings and denominate our
business transactions in a variety of foreign currencies. We utilize a sensitivity analysis to
measure the potential loss in earnings based on a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates and a
10% change in foreign currency rates. A summary of our primary market risk exposures follows.
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from our floating rate debt, including various
revolving and other lines of credit (refer to Note B). At May 31, 2005, approximately 35.5% of our
debt was subject to floating interest rates. If interest rates were to increase 100 bps from May
31, 2005 and assuming no changes in debt from the May 31, 2005 levels, the additional annual
interest expense would amount to approximately $3.0 million on a pre-tax basis. A similar increase
in interest rates in fiscal 2004 would have resulted in approximately $1.6 million in additional
interest expense.
Our hedged risks are associated with certain fixed rate debt whereby we have a $200.0 million
notional amount interest rate swap contract designated as a fair value hedge to pay floating rates
of interest based on six-month LIBOR that matures in fiscal 2010. Because critical terms of the
debt and interest rate swap match, the hedge is considered perfectly effective against changes in
the fair value of debt, and therefore, there is no need to periodically reassess the effectiveness
during the term of the hedge.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet and measured at fair value.
Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges and/or any
ineffective portion of hedges are recognized as a gain or loss in our consolidated statement of
income in the current period. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used effectively
as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings (losses), along with the change in the value of the
hedged item. Such derivative transactions are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended and interpreted. The Company does not
hold or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk
Our foreign sales and results of operations are subject to the impact of foreign currency
fluctuations (refer to Note A). As most of our foreign operations are in countries with fairly
stable currencies, such as Belgium, Canada and the United Kingdom, this effect has not generally
been material. In addition, foreign debt is denominated in the respective foreign currency, thereby
eliminating any related translation impact on earnings.
If the U.S. dollar continues to weaken, our foreign results of operations will be positively
impacted, but the effect is not expected to be material. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange
rates would not have resulted in a material impact to net income for the years ended May 31, 2005
and 2004. We do not currently hedge against the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The foregoing discussion includes forward-looking statements relating to our business.
These forward-looking statements, or other statements made by us, are made based on our
expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and are subject to uncertainties and
factors (including those specified below) that are difficult to predict and in many instances, are
beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in
or implied by any such forward-looking statements. These uncertainties and factors include: (a)
general economic conditions; (b) the price and supply of raw materials, particularly
petroleum-based, titanium dioxide, certain resins, aerosols and solvents; (c) continued growth in
demand for our products; (d) legal, environmental and litigation risks inherent in our construction
and chemicals businesses and risks related to the adequacy of our reserves and insurance coverage
for such matters; (e) the effect of changes in interest rates; (f) the effect of fluctuations in
currency exchange rates upon our foreign operations; (g) the effect of non-currency risks of
investing in and conducting operations in foreign countries, including those relating to domestic
and international political, social, economic and regulatory factors; (h) risks and uncertainties
associated with our ongoing acquisition and divestiture activities; (i) risks inherent in our
contingent liability reserves, including asbestos; and other risks detailed in our other reports
and statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set
forth in our prospectus and prospectus supplement included as part of our Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (file No. 333-120536), as the same may be amended from time to time.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
29
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||
|
Current Assets
|
||||||||
|
Cash and short-term investments (Note A)
|
$ | 184,140 | $ | 34,559 | ||||
|
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $18,565 in 2005
and $18,147 in 2004)
|
553,084 | 488,139 | ||||||
|
Inventories (Note A)
|
334,404 | 289,359 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes (Notes A and C)
|
40,876 | 40,919 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note A)
|
158,991 | 138,613 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
1,271,495 | 991,589 | ||||||
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost
(Note A)
|
||||||||
|
Land
|
24,510 | 24,687 | ||||||
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
236,576 | 231,140 | ||||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
514,478 | 511,245 | ||||||
|
|
775,564 | 767,072 | ||||||
|
Less allowance for depreciation and amortization
|
385,586 | 386,017 | ||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
389,978 | 381,055 | ||||||
|
Other Assets
|
||||||||
|
Goodwill (Note A)
|
663,224 | 648,243 | ||||||
|
Other intangible assets, net of amortization (Note A)
|
275,744 | 282,372 | ||||||
|
Other
|
55,804 | 46,832 | ||||||
|
Total other assets
|
994,772 | 977,447 | ||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$ | 2,656,245 | $ | 2,350,091 | ||||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
|
Current Liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$ | 274,573 | $ | 205,092 | ||||
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note B)
|
97 | 991 | ||||||
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
95,667 | 88,670 | ||||||
|
Accrued loss reserves (Note H)
|
65,452 | 56,699 | ||||||
|
Asbestos-related liabilities (Note H)
|
55,000 | 47,500 | ||||||
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
84,550 | 75,513 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
575,339 | 474,465 | ||||||
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities (Note B)
|
837,948 | 718,929 | ||||||
|
Asbestos-related liabilities (Note H)
|
46,172 | 43,107 | ||||||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
71,363 | 59,910 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes (Notes A and C)
|
78,914 | 78,388 | ||||||
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
1,034,397 | 900,334 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
1,609,736 | 1,374,799 | ||||||
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; authorized 50,000 shares;
none issued
|
||||||||
|
Common stock, par value $0.01; authorized 300,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 117,554 as of May 2005;
issued and outstanding 116,122 as of May 2004 (Note D)
|
1,176 | 1,161 | ||||||
|
Paid-in capital
|
535,204 | 513,986 | ||||||
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note A)
|
10,004 | (3,881 | ) | |||||
|
Retained earnings
|
500,125 | 464,026 | ||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
1,046,509 | 975,292 | ||||||
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$ | 2,656,245 | $ | 2,350,091 | ||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
30
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
|
Net Sales
(Note A)
|
$ | 2,555,735 | $ | 2,307,553 | $ | 2,053,482 | ||||||
|
Cost of Sales
|
1,449,184 | 1,276,372 | 1,134,207 | |||||||||
|
Gross Profit
|
1,106,551 | 1,031,181 | 919,275 | |||||||||
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
829,445 | 784,620 | 704,710 | |||||||||
|
Asbestos Charges (Note H)
|
78,000 | 140,000 | ||||||||||
|
Interest Expense, Net (Note A)
|
35,378 | 28,945 | 26,712 | |||||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
163,728 | 217,616 | 47,853 | |||||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes (Note C)
|
58,696 | 75,730 | 12,526 | |||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 105,032 | $ | 141,886 | $ | 35,327 | ||||||
|
Average Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding (Note D)
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
116,899 | 115,777 | 115,294 | |||||||||
|
Diluted
|
126,364 | 124,744 | 116,405 | |||||||||
|
Earnings per Common Share
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 0.90 | $ | 1.23 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 0.86 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.30 | ||||||
|
Cash Dividends per Share of Common Stock
|
$ | 0.590 | $ | 0.550 | $ | 0.515 | ||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
31
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Par/ | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of Shares | Stated | Paid-in | Treasury | Income (Loss) | Retained | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Note D) | Value | Capital | Stock | (Note A) | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2002
|
114,696 | $ | 1,786 | $ | 585,566 | $ | (88,364 | ) | $ | (50,485 | ) | $ | 409,603 | $ | 858,106 | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
35,327 | 35,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation gain and other
|
33,316 | 33,316 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
68,643 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(59,139 | ) | (59,139 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Treasury stock retired
|
(113 | ) | (85,723 | ) | 85,836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase of stock
|
(100 | ) | (1,167 | ) | (1,167 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock option exercises, net
|
300 | 2 | 2,015 | 1,269 | 3,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted stock awards
|
600 | 5 | 6,111 | 1,259 | 7,375 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Par value adjustment and other
|
(524 | ) | 428 | (96 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2003
|
115,496 | 1,156 | 508,397 | (1,167 | ) | (17,169 | ) | 385,791 | 877,008 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
141,886 | 141,886 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation gain and other
|
13,288 | 13,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
155,174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(63,651 | ) | (63,651 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock option exercises, net
|
555 | 5 | 5,453 | 338 | 5,796 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted stock awards
|
71 | 136 | 829 | 965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2004
|
116,122 | 1,161 | 513,986 | -0- | (3,881 | ) | 464,026 | 975,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
105,032 | 105,032 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation gain and other
|
13,885 | 13,885 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
118,917 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(68,933 | ) | (68,933 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock option exercises, net
|
1,109 | 11 | 12,532 | 12,543 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grants of stock options
|
2,850 | 2,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted stock awards, net
|
323 | 4 | 5,836 | 5,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2005
|
117,554 | $ | 1,176 | $ | 535,204 | $ | -0- | $ | 10,004 | $ | 500,125 | $ | 1,046,509 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
32
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
| Year Ended May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 105,032 | $ | 141,886 | $ | 35,327 | ||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
49,841 | 47,840 | 44,736 | |||||||||
|
Amortization
|
16,151 | 15,437 | 13,938 | |||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes
|
305 | 31,815 | (46,733 | ) | ||||||||
|
(Earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates
|
(354 | ) | (314 | ) | (396 | ) | ||||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect
from purchases and sales of businesses:
|
||||||||||||
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
(63,611 | ) | (41,516 | ) | (37,259 | ) | ||||||
|
(Increase) decrease in inventory
|
(44,429 | ) | (31,949 | ) | 997 | |||||||
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other
current and long-term assets
|
(24,101 | ) | 258 | (34,131 | ) | |||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
|
69,037 | 30,607 | 9,934 | |||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and benefits
|
6,621 | 9,124 | (3,831 | ) | ||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued loss reserves
|
8,753 | (7,531 | ) | 15,358 | ||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities
|
7,733 | 7,487 | (761 | ) | ||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in asbestos-related liabilities
|
10,565 | (53,976 | ) | 141,206 | ||||||||
|
Other including exchange rate changes
|
15,809 | 4,867 | 17,891 | |||||||||
|
Cash From Operating Activities
|
157,352 | 154,035 | 156,276 | |||||||||
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
(55,609 | ) | (51,253 | ) | (41,814 | ) | ||||||
|
Acquisition of new businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(20,100 | ) | (37,703 | ) | (65,994 | ) | ||||||
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
(44,309 | ) | (36,955 | ) | (15,145 | ) | ||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
39,154 | 21,410 | 11,376 | |||||||||
|
(Investments in) and distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
|
136 | (425 | ) | 974 | ||||||||
|
Proceeds from the sales of assets and businesses
|
5,426 | 3,664 | 202 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
(666 | ) | (1,284 | ) | 597 | |||||||
|
Cash (Used For) Investing Activities
|
(75,968 | ) | (102,546 | ) | (109,804 | ) | ||||||
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Additions to long-term and short-term debt
|
200,153 | 200,345 | 305,200 | |||||||||
|
Reductions of long-term and short-term debt
|
(79,665 | ) | (206,623 | ) | (294,099 | ) | ||||||
|
Cash dividends
|
(68,933 | ) | (63,651 | ) | (59,139 | ) | ||||||
|
Exercise of stock options
|
12,543 | 5,796 | 3,286 | |||||||||
|
Repurchase of stock
|
(1,167 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Cash From (Used For) Financing Activities
|
64,098 | (64,133 | ) | (45,919 | ) | |||||||
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and
Short-Term Investments
|
4,099 | 234 | 4,244 | |||||||||
|
Net Change in Cash and Short-Term Investments
|
149,581 | (12,410 | ) | 4,797 | ||||||||
|
Cash and Short-Term Investments at Beginning of Year
|
34,559 | 46,969 | 42,172 | |||||||||
|
Cash and Short-Term Investments at End of Year
|
$ | 184,140 | $ | 34,559 | $ | 46,969 | ||||||
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
$ | 39,279 | $ | 25,572 | $ | 28,678 | ||||||
|
Income taxes
|
$ | 48,535 | $ | 59,252 | $ | 59,234 | ||||||
|
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing
and Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares issued for restricted stock plan
|
$ | 5,840 | $ | 965 | $ | 7,375 | ||||||
|
Grants of stock options
|
$ | 2,850 | ||||||||||
|
Debt from business combinations
|
$ | 1,230 | ||||||||||
|
Receivables from the sale of assets
|
$ | 1,233 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
33
NOTES to CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2005, 2004, 2003
NOTE A — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1) Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our
financial statements consolidate all of our affiliates – companies that we control and in
which we hold a majority voting interest. We account for our investments in less than
majority-owned joint ventures under the equity method. Effects of transactions between related
companies are eliminated.
In reconciling income taxes payable for 2005, we identified certain fiscal 2003 tax payments
that were not reflected in our financial statements. The impact of this discovery has resulted in
our reclassification of the May 31,
2004 balance sheet. The reclassification had no impact on
fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 net income or the cash and
income taxes payable balances at May 31, 2005 nor does it
impact cash flows for each of the two years ended May 31,
2005 and 2004. Previously reported cash flow for the year
ended May 31, 2003 was reduced by $4.0 million.
We have also reclassified certain prior-year amounts to conform to this year’s presentation.
2) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3) Business Combinations
During the year ended May 31, 2005, we completed five acquisitions of product lines. As of the
respective dates of acquisition, we recorded the following estimated fair values of assets and
liabilities assumed:
| (In thousands) | ||||
|
Current assets
|
$ | 2,920 | ||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
2,283 | |||
|
Goodwill
|
10,386 | |||
|
Other intangible assets
|
6,285 | |||
|
Liabilities assumed
|
(1,774 | ) | ||
|
Net Assets Acquired
|
$ | 20,100 | ||
Our consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations of these businesses as
of their respective dates of acquisition.
Pro forma results of operations for the years ended May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2004 were not
materially different from reported results and, consequently, are not presented.
4) Foreign Currency
The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is their local currency. Accordingly, for
the periods presented, assets and liabilities have been translated using exchange rates at year end
while income and expense for the periods have been translated using a weighted average exchange
rate. The resulting translation adjustments have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity, and will be included in net earnings only upon
the sale or liquidation of the underlying foreign investment, neither of which is contemplated at
this time. Transaction gains and losses have been immaterial during the past three fiscal years.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
34
5) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is shown net of taxes, consists of the
following components:
| Foreign | Minimum | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
| Currency | Pension | Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||
| Translation | Liability | on | ||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Adjustments | Adjustments | Securities | Total | ||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2002
|
$ | (49,681 | ) | $ | (253 | ) | $ | (551 | ) | $ | (50,485 | ) | ||||
|
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)
losses included in net income
|
(149 | ) | (149 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss)
|
39,872 | (8,695 | ) | (1,242 | ) | 29,935 | ||||||||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
2,757 | 773 | 3,530 | |||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2003
|
(9,809 | ) | (6,191 | ) | (1,169 | ) | (17,169 | ) | ||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)
losses included in net income
|
97 | 97 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss)
|
9,686 | 1,603 | 2,645 | 13,934 | ||||||||||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
(467 | ) | (276 | ) | (743 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2004
|
(123 | ) | (5,055 | ) | 1,297 | (3,881 | ) | |||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)
losses included in net income
|
(73 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss)
|
15,008 | (2,379 | ) | 1,082 | 13,711 | |||||||||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
529 | (282 | ) | 247 | ||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2005
|
$ | 14,885 | $ | (6,905 | ) | $ | 2,024 | $ | 10,004 | |||||||
6) Cash and Short-Term Investments
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We do not believe we are
exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and short-term investments.
7) Marketable Securities
Marketable securities, included in other current assets, are considered available for sale and
are reported at fair value, based on quoted market prices. Changes in unrealized gains and losses,
net of applicable taxes, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within
Stockholders’ Equity. If we were to experience any significant other-than-temporary declines in
market value from original cost, those amounts would be reflected in operating income in the period
in which the loss were to occur. In order to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in
market value has occurred, the duration of the decline in value and our ability to hold the
investment to recovery are considered in conjunction with an evaluation of the strength of the
underlying collateral and the extent to which the investment’s carrying value exceeds its related
market value. Marketable securities totaled $49.1 million and $41.4 million at May 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
8) Financial Instruments
Financial instruments recorded on the balance sheet include cash and short-term
investments, accounts receivable, notes and accounts payable, and debt. The carrying amount of
cash and short-term investments, accounts receivable and notes and accounts payable approximates
fair value because of their short-term maturity.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet and measured at fair value.
Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges and/or any
ineffective portion of hedges are recognized as a gain or loss in our consolidated statement of
income in the current period. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used effectively
as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings (losses), along with the change in the value of the
hedged item. Such derivative transactions are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended and interpreted. The Company does not
hold or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
The carrying amount of our other debt instruments approximates fair value based on quoted
market prices, variable interest rates or borrowing rates for similar types of debt arrangements.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
35
9) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined
substantially on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and market being determined on the basis of
replacement cost or net realizable value. Inventory costs include raw material, labor and
manufacturing overhead. Inventories were composed of the following major classes:
| May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
|
Raw material and supplies
|
$ | 105,060 | $ | 95,378 | ||||
|
Finished goods
|
229,344 | 193,981 | ||||||
|
Total Inventory
|
$ | 334,404 | $ | 289,359 | ||||
10) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We elected to adopt the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” as of June 1, 2001, at which time we ceased the
amortization of all goodwill. We also elected to perform the required annual impairment assessment
in the first quarter of our fiscal year. If a loss were to result from the performance of the
annual test, it would be reflected in operating income. The annual goodwill impairment assessment
involves estimating the fair value of each reporting unit, which has been defined as one level
below our industrial and consumer operating segments, and comparing it with its carrying amount. If
the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, additional steps are followed to
recognize a potential impairment loss. Calculating the fair value of the reporting units requires
significant estimates and assumptions by management. We estimate the fair value of our reporting
units by applying third-party
market value indicators to each of our reporting units’ projected earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors,
including future business plans, actual operating results and market data. In the event that our
calculations indicate that goodwill is impaired, a fair value estimate of each tangible and
intangible asset would be established. This process would require the application of discounted
cash flows expected to be generated by each asset in addition to independent asset appraisals, as
appropriate. Cash flow estimates are based on our historical experience and our internal business
plans, and appropriate discount rates are applied. The results of our annual impairment tests for
the fiscal years ended May 31, 2005 and 2004, performed during the first quarter of each respective
fiscal year, did not require any adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reporting segment, for the year ended
May 31, 2005, are as follows:
| Industrial | Consumer | |||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Segment | Segment | Total | |||||||||
|
Balance as of
May 31, 2004
|
$ | 303,743 | $ | 344,500 | $ | 648,243 | ||||||
|
Acquisitions
|
8,657 | 1,729 | 10,386 | |||||||||
|
Purchase accounting
adjustments*
|
590 | 590 | ||||||||||
|
Divestitures
|
(2,114 | ) | (2,114 | ) | ||||||||
|
Translation adjustments
|
5,550 | 569 | 6,119 | |||||||||
|
Balance as of
May 31, 2005
|
$ | 316,426 | $ | 346,798 | $ | 663,224 | ||||||
*Relates primarily to other accruals.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
36
Other intangible assets consist of the following major classes:
| Gross | Net Other | |||||||||||||||
| Amortization | Carrying | Accumulated | Intangible | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Period (in Years) | Amount | Amortization | Assets | ||||||||||||
|
As of May 31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized intangible assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Formulae
|
10 to 33 | $ | 176,884 | $ | 65,628 | $ | 111,256 | |||||||||
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
7 to 33 | 69,152 | 19,346 | 49,806 | ||||||||||||
|
Trademarks/names
|
5 to 40 | 9,812 | 3,270 | 6,542 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
3 to 30 | 24,335 | 12,009 | 12,326 | ||||||||||||
|
Total Amortized Intangibles
|
280,183 | 100,253 | 179,930 | |||||||||||||
|
Unamortized intangible assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Trade names
|
95,814 | 95,814 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total Other Intangible Assets
|
$ | 375,997 | $ | 100,253 | $ | 275,744 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
As of May 31, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized intangible assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Formulae
|
10 to 33 | $ | 175,694 | $ | 57,749 | $ | 117,945 | |||||||||
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
7 to 33 | 67,202 | 16,119 | 51,083 | ||||||||||||
|
Trademarks/names
|
5 to 40 | 6,637 | 2,887 | 3,750 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
3 to 30 | 24,994 | 11,464 | 13,530 | ||||||||||||
|
Total Amortized Intangibles
|
274,527 | 88,219 | 186,308 | |||||||||||||
|
Unamortized intangible assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Trade names
|
96,064 | 96,064 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total Other Intangible Assets
|
$ | 370,591 | $ | 88,219 | $ | 282,372 | ||||||||||
The aggregate other intangible asset amortization expense for the fiscal years ended
May 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $13.0 million, $12.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively. For
each of the next five fiscal years through May 31, 2010, the estimated annual intangible asset
amortization expense will approximate $12.0 million.
11) Depreciation
Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the following ranges of
useful lives:
|
Land improvements
|
5 to 42 years | |||
|
Buildings and improvements
|
5 to 50 years | |||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
2 to 20 years |
12) Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when realized or realizable, and when earned. In general, this is when
title and risk of loss passes to the customer. Further, revenues are realizable when we have
persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been
provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is
reasonably assured. We reduce our revenues for estimated customer returns and allowances, certain
rebates, sales incentives, and promotions in the same period the related sales are recorded.
13) Shipping Costs
Shipping costs paid to third-party shippers for transporting products to customers are
included in selling, general and administrative expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2005, 2004
and 2003, shipping costs were $100.1 million, $86.0 million and $78.9 million, respectively.
14) Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, advertising costs
were $33.7 million, $37.1 million and $28.5 million, respectively.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we changed our accounting classification for
cooperative advertising by reflecting the amounts paid as a reduction of sales as opposed to a
component of selling, general and administrative expenses and reclassified the previous year’s
information. The new classification represents only a movement of expense and therefore has no
impact on our earnings or earnings per share.
15) Research and Development
Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in
selling, general and administrative expenses. The amounts charged for the years ended May 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003 were $28.9 million, $26.2 million and $23.8 million, respectively. The
customer-sponsored portion of such expenditures was not significant.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
37
16) Stock-Based Compensation
Effective June 1, 2004, we voluntarily adopted the preferable fair value recognition
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation,” for our stock-based employee compensation plans. As outlined by SFAS No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” we chose to apply the
modified prospective method in adopting this accounting change. Under this method, stock-based
employee compensation expense recognized in fiscal 2005 is the same as that which would have been
recognized had the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied to account for
all
employee awards from its original effective date. Results of prior periods have not been restated.
The adoption of SFAS No. 123 impacted net income, basic earnings per share and diluted
earnings per share for the year ended May 31, 2005 by approximately $2.4 million, $0.02 per share
and $0.02 per share. Prior to June 1,2004 the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in
accordance with APB opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The following table
represents the effect on net income and earnings per share for the years ended May 31, 2004 and
2003, as if compensation cost for stock options granted had been determined in accordance with the
fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123:
| Year Ended May 31 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | Basic | Diluted | Basic | Diluted | ||||||||||||
|
Net income, as reported
|
$ | 141,886 | $ | 141,886 | $ | 35,327 | $ | 35,327 | ||||||||
|
Add: Income effect of contingently convertible shares
1
|
3,142 | 158 | ||||||||||||||
|
Adjusted net income, as reported
|
141,886 | 145,028 | 35,327 | 35,485 | ||||||||||||
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense
from restricted stock plans included in reported
net income, net of related tax effects
|
825 | 825 | 1,339 | 1,339 | ||||||||||||
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
determined under fair value-based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects
|
(3,969 | ) | (3,969 | ) | (4,517 | ) | (4,517 | ) | ||||||||
|
Pro Forma Net Income
|
$ | 138,742 | $ | 141,884 | $ | 32,149 | $ | 32,307 | ||||||||
|
Earnings per Share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
As Reported
|
$ | 1.23 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.30 | ||||||||
|
Pro Forma
|
$ | 1.20 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.28 | ||||||||
| 1 | Refer to Note D, Common Stock, for additional information regarding the accounting treatment of contingently convertible securities. |
The fair value of stock options granted is estimated as of the date of grant using
a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
3.7 | % | 3.7 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||||
|
Expected life of option
|
6.4 yrs | 7.0 yrs | 7.0 yrs | |||||||||
|
Expected dividend yield
|
3.4 | % | 3.5 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||||
|
Expected volatility rate
|
31.0 | % | 35.9 | % | 37.3 | % | ||||||
17) Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense is shown net of investment income, which consists of interest, dividends and
capital gains (losses). Investment income for the years ended May 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $5.0
million, $2.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
18) Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires the
recognition of deferred income taxes using the liability method. Under the liability method,
deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax effect of temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amount of assets and liabilities and the amounts used for income tax
purposes and for certain changes in valuation allowances. Valuation allowances are recorded to
reduce certain deferred tax assets when, in our estimation, it is more likely than not that a tax
benefit will not be realized.
We have not provided for U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes on approximately $447.1
million of foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of May 31, 2005, because such earnings have been
retained and reinvested
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
38
by the subsidiaries. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. or foreign withholding
taxes which may become payable if undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were paid to us as
dividends. The additional income taxes and applicable withholding taxes that would result had such
earnings actually been repatriated are not practically determinable.
19) Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ratified the consensus of the
Emerging Issues Task Force (the “EITF”) with respect to EITF issue 04-8, “The Effect of
Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings Per Share.” The consensus requires us to
consider all instruments with contingent conversion features that include a market price trigger in
our diluted earnings per share calculations, regardless of whether that market price trigger has
been met. Therefore, our calculation of fully diluted earnings per share includes the 8,034,355
contingent shares of our common stock related to our convertible debt, which includes a market
price trigger, by applying the “if-converted” method. EITF 04-8 also requires us to restate
previously reported earnings per share for all prior periods presented.
On October 22, 2004 the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”) was signed into law.
Included in the Act is a provision allowing, in general, a new special tax deduction of up to 9%
(once fully phased-in) of the lesser of 1) “qualified production activities income” as defined in
the Act or 2) taxable income for the tax year, after deduction for the utilization of any net
operating loss carryforwards.
As a result of the new special tax deduction provision included in the Act, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position No. 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), ‘Accounting for
Income Taxes,’ to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (“FSP 109-1”) in December 2004. FSP 109-1 provides that the new special
tax deduction created in the Act should be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with
SFAS No. 109 and not as a tax rate reduction.
The effective date of the new special tax deduction included in the Act is for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2004. Accordingly, the new provision is not available for our current
fiscal year ending May 31, 2005. Rather, the new provision is first available to us for our fiscal
year ending May 31, 2006. We are currently evaluating the effect that the new special tax deduction
will have on our results for the year ending May 31, 2006.
Also included in the Act is a provision allowing corporate taxpayers to claim a special
one-time dividends received deduction of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated to the U.S.
In general, a deduction of 85% of certain dividends, in excess of a base-period amount, received
from certain controlled foreign subsidiaries is allowable. The repatriation provision is comprised
of an intricate set of rules and is subject to limitations and reinvestment requirements. The new
provision is applicable, given our fiscal year-end, for qualified repatriations made prior to May
31, 2006.
In response to the new special one-time dividends received deduction, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation
Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (“FSP 109-2”) in December 2004. FSP 109-2
provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation process.
Given the complexity of the repatriation provision, computing the tax effects of the
repatriation provision is not practically determinable at this time. Accordingly, we have not
elected the repatriation provision for our fiscal year ended May 31, 2005. We may elect to apply
this provision during our year ending May 31, 2006. The Company expects to complete an evaluation
of the effect the new special one-time dividends received deduction, including a comprehensive
calculation of the applicable base-period amount and tax effect any repatriation may have on our
results for the year ending May 31, 2006. We plan to complete our evaluation during our 2006 fiscal
year.
In December 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”
(“Statement 123(R)”). Statement 123(R) requires that all share-based payments be recognized in the
financial statements based on their fair values. The provisions of this statement are effective for
reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As discussed above we began expensing stock
options as of June 1, 2004. As such, the adoption of Statement 123(R) is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In November 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 requires that certain costs, including abnormal idle capacity expense and
freight, be excluded from the cost of inventory and that fixed production costs be allocated based
on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The requirements of this statement are
effective for periods ending after December 31, 2005. The adoption of Statement 151 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
39
NOTE B — BORROWINGS
A description of long-term debt follows:
| May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
|
Unsecured 4.45% senior notes due October 15, 2009.
1
|
$ | 197,637 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Unsecured 6.25% senior notes due December 15, 2013.
|
200,000 | $ | 200,000 | |||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Unsecured $297,000,000 face value at maturity 2.75% senior convertible
notes due May 13, 2033.
|
150,042 | 150,042 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Unsecured 7.00% senior notes due June 15, 2005.
2
|
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Unsecured notes due March 1, 2008. Interest, which is tied to LIBOR, averaged
2.91% at May 31, 2005.
|
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Commercial paper with a weighted average interest rate at May 31, 2004 of 1.59%.
|
60,651 | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Unsecured senior notes due insurance companies: 6.61% due November 15, 2006 in the
amount of $10,000,000 and 7.30% due November 15, 2008 in the amount of $30,000,000.
|
40,000 | 55,000 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Revolving 364-day credit agreement for $28,000,000 with a bank through October 12, 2004.
Interest was 1.56% at May 31, 2004.
|
2,955 | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Other unsecured notes payable at various rates of interest due in installments through 2011.
|
366 | 1,272 | ||||||
|
|
838,045 | 719,920 | ||||||
|
Less current portion
|
97 | 991 | ||||||
|
Total Long-Term Debt, Less Current Maturities
|
$ | 837,948 | $ | 718,929 | ||||
| 1 | We entered into an interest rate swap which has the effect of converting this fixed rate note to variable rates based on the six-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The weighted average effective rate was 4.03%. | |
| 2 | These obligations which were refinanced in June 2005 have been classified as long-term debt. |
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to May 31,
2005 are as follows: 2006 — $0.1 million; 2007 — $10.1 million; 2008 — $250.1 million (including $150.0
million of 2.75% Senior Convertible Notes based on the date of the noteholders’ first put option);
2009 — $30.0 million; 2010 — $347.7 million. Additionally, at May 31, 2005, we had unused lines of
credit totaling $454.5 million.
In June 2002, we established an accounts receivable securitization program with several banks
for certain of our subsidiaries, providing for a wholly-owned special purpose entity (“SPE”) to
receive investments of up to $125.0 million. The securitized accounts receivable are owned in their
entirety by RPM Funding Corporation, a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary of RPM International
Inc., and are not available to satisfy claims of our creditors until the participating banks’
obligations have been paid in full. This securitization is accomplished by having certain
subsidiaries sell various of their accounts receivable to the SPE, and by having the SPE then
transfer those receivables to a conduit administered by a bank. This transaction did not constitute
a form of off-balance sheet financing, and is fully reflected in our financial statements. This
transaction increased our
liquidity and reduced our financing costs by replacing up to $125.0 million of existing borrowings
at lower interest rates. The amounts available under the program are subject to changes in the
credit ratings of our customers, customer concentration levels or certain characteristics of the
underlying accounts receivable. As of May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2004, we had no outstanding balance
under this arrangement.
In May 2003, we issued $297.0 million face value at maturity unsecured 2.75% Senior Convertible Notes due May 13, 2033. The 2.75% Notes are convertible into 8,034,355
shares of RPM International Inc. common stock at a price of $18.68 per share, subject to
adjustment, during any fiscal quarter for which the closing price of the common stock is greater
than $22.41 per share for a defined duration of time. The Notes are also convertible during any
period in which the credit rating of the Notes is below a specified level or if specified corporate
transactions have occurred. The 2.75% Notes are redeemable by the holder for the issuance price
plus accrued original issue discount in May 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023, 2028 and 2033. Interest on the
2.75% Notes is payable beginning November 13, 2003 until May 13, 2008. After that date, cash
interest will not be paid prior to maturity subject to certain contingencies.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
40
In December 2003, we issued and sold $200.0 million of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2013 as a
means of refinancing. The entire net proceeds of $197.0 million from this offering were used to
repay in full the $128.0 million of then-outstanding borrowings under our $500.0 million revolving
credit facility and $69.0 million of the then-outstanding $72.0 million balance under our asset
securitization program.
On September 30, 2004, we issued and sold $200.0 million of 4.45% Senior Unsecured Notes due
2009, which we concurrently swapped back to floating interest rate debt. We used a portion of the
net proceeds to pay off our $15.0 million 6.12% Senior Notes due 2004, which matured on November
15, 2004 and also our then outstanding $68.0 million of commercial paper.
During November 2004, we refinanced our $500.0 million revolving credit facility, due July 14,
2005, with a $330.0 million 5-year credit facility, due November 19, 2009. This new facility will
be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and to provide back-up liquidity for the issuance of commercial paper. The
facility provides for borrowings in U.S. dollars and several foreign currencies and provides
sublimits for the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million and a
swing-line of up to $20.0 million for short-term borrowings of less than 15 days. In addition, the
size of the facility may be expanded upon our request by up to an additional $100.0 million, thus
potentially expanding the facility to $430.0 million, subject to lender approval. As of May 31,
2005, we had no outstanding balance under the agreement.
Subsequent to year end the Company borrowed $115.0 million under its $330.0 million five-year
revolving credit facility. A portion of the borrowing, along with cash on hand, was used to repay
in full the principal and accrued interest on the Company’s $150.0 million 7.0% Senior Unsecured
Notes due 2005. In addition, a portion of the cash borrowed was used for general corporate
purposes.
NOTE C — INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes using the liability
method.
Income before income taxes as shown in the consolidated statements of income consisted of the
following:
| Year Ended May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$ | 115,192 | $ | 182,032 | $ | 19,025 | ||||||
|
Foreign
|
48,536 | 35,584 | 28,828 | |||||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
$ | 163,728 | $ | 217,616 | $ | 47,853 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Current
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal
|
$ | 31,313 | $ | 30,579 | $ | 36,841 | ||||||
|
State and local
|
8,098 | 7,138 | 8,747 | |||||||||
|
Foreign
|
19,160 | 14,260 | 13,671 | |||||||||
|
|
58,571 | 51,977 | 59,259 | |||||||||
|
Deferred
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal
|
(2,544 | ) | 21,077 | (39,616 | ) | |||||||
|
State and local
|
(218 | ) | 3,011 | (5,659 | ) | |||||||
|
Foreign
|
2,887 | (335 | ) | (1,458 | ) | |||||||
|
|
125 | 23,753 | (46,733 | ) | ||||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
$ | 58,696 | $ | 75,730 | $ | 12,526 | ||||||
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
41
The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of May 31,
2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| (In thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
|
Deferred income tax assets
related to:
|
||||||||
|
Inventories
|
$ | 2,983 | $ | 1,692 | ||||
|
Allowance for losses
|
7,077 | 14,538 | ||||||
|
Accrued compensation
and benefits
|
7,892 | 8,402 | ||||||
|
Asbestos related liabilities
|
36,964 | 33,978 | ||||||
|
Accrued other expenses
|
6,768 | 7,753 | ||||||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
25,780 | 18,550 | ||||||
|
Net operating loss and credit
carryforwards
|
33,131 | 23,261 | ||||||
|
Other
|
2,972 | 1,802 | ||||||
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
123,567 | 109,976 | ||||||
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
(13,946 | ) | (9,734 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
109,621 | 100,242 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Deferred income tax (liabilities)
related to:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
(52,846 | ) | (40,660 | ) | ||||
|
Prepaid pension
|
(10,188 | ) | (10,245 | ) | ||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
(84,625 | ) | (86,806 | ) | ||||
|
Total deferred income tax
(liabilities)
|
(147,659 | ) | (137,711 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred Income Tax Assets
(Liabilities), Net
|
$ | (38,038 | ) | $ | (37,469 | ) | ||
At May 31, 2005, we had U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $21.5
million which expire starting in 2010. Additionally, we had foreign net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $35.4 million at May 31, 2005 of which approximately $0.9 million
expire at various dates beginning in 2007 and approximately $34.5 million which have an indefinite
carryforward period. These net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards may be used to
offset a portion of future taxable income and thereby reduce or eliminate our U.S federal or
foreign income taxes otherwise payable.
Management has determined, based on the available evidence, that it is uncertain that future
taxable income of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as well as anticipated foreign
source income will be significant enough to recognize certain of these deferred tax assets. As a
result, a valuation allowance of approximately $4.3 million has been recorded during the year ended
May 31, 2005.
The valuation allowance relates to U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards, certain
foreign net operating losses and net foreign deferred tax assets recorded in purchase accounting.
The most significant portion of the valuation allowance is associated with deferred tax assets
recorded in purchase accounting. Any reversal of the valuation allowance that was recorded in
purchase accounting would reduce goodwill. In the current year, a reduction of the valuation
allowance of $0.5 million was allocated to goodwill as a result of changes in estimated deferred
taxes recorded in purchase accounting.
The following table reconciles income tax expense computed by applying the U.S.
statutory federal income tax rate against income before income taxes to the provision for
income tax expense:
| Year Ended May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Income tax expense at the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate
|
$ | 57,305 | $ | 76,166 | $ | 16,749 | ||||||
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
(7,810 | ) | (2,930 | ) | (2,986 | ) | ||||||
|
State and local income taxes net of federal income tax benefit
|
5,122 | 6,597 | 2,007 | |||||||||
|
Tax benefits from the extraterritorial income exclusion
|
(754 | ) | (2,870 | ) | (1,250 | ) | ||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
4,287 | 278 | 115 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
546 | (1,511 | ) | (2,109 | ) | |||||||
|
Provision for Income Tax Expense
|
$ | 58,696 | $ | 75,730 | $ | 12,526 | ||||||
|
Effective Income Tax Rate
|
35.8 | % | 34.8 | % | 26.2 | % | ||||||
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
42
NOTE D — COMMON STOCK
There were 300,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at May 31, 2005 and 2004 with a par
value of $0.01 per share. At May 31, 2005 and 2004, there were 117,554,000 and 116,122,000 shares
outstanding, respectively, each of which is entitled to one vote.
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each year. To compute
diluted earnings per share, the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during each year was increased by common stock options with exercisable prices lower than the
average market prices of common stock during each year and reduced by the number of shares assumed
to have been purchased with proceeds from the exercised options.
In October 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ratified the consensus of the
Emerging Issues Task Force (the “EITF”) with respect to EITF issue 04-8, “The Effect of
Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings Per Share.” The consensus requires us to
consider all instruments with contingent conversion features that include a market price trigger in
our diluted earnings per share calculations, regardless of whether that market price trigger has
been met. Therefore, our calculation of fully diluted earnings per share includes the 8,034,355
contingent shares of our common stock related to our convertible debt, which includes a market
price trigger, by applying the “if-converted” method. EITF 04-8 also requires us to restate
previously reported earnings per share for all prior periods presented.
Effective October 10, 2003, the RPM International Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Plan for
Directors (the “2003 Plan”) was approved by our stockholders. The plan was established primarily
for the purpose of recruiting and retaining directors, and to align the interests of directors with
the interests of our stockholders. Only directors who are not employees of RPM International Inc.
are eligible to participate. Under the 2003 Plan, up to 500,000 shares of RPM International Inc.
may be awarded. For the year ended May 31, 2005, 20,000 shares were granted, with 458,400 shares
available for future grant. Unamortized deferred compensation expense relating to restricted stock
grants for directors of $0.4 million at May 31, 2005, is being amortized over a 3-year vesting
period.
On October 8, 2004, our stockholders approved the RPM International Inc. Omnibus Equity and
Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan is intended to be
the primary stock-based award program for covered employees. A wide variety of stock and
stock-based awards, as well as dollar-denominated performance-based awards, may be granted under
the Omnibus Plan. A total of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock may be subject to awards under
the Omnibus Plan. Of the 6,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under the Omnibus Plan, up to
3,000,000 shares may be subject to “full-value” awards such as restricted stock, restricted stock
unit, performance stock and performance stock unit awards. For the year ended May 31, 2005, 321,500
shares of restricted stock were granted under the Omnibus Plan, with 5,678,500 shares available for
future grant including 2,678,500 shares available for full-value awards.
In addition to the restricted shares outstanding under the Omnibus Plan, we have restricted
shares outstanding under two equity compensation plans for employees. Under the terms of these
plans, up to 2,563,000 shares may be awarded to certain employees, generally subject to forfeiture
until the completion of three, five or ten years of service. For the year ended May 31, 2005, 39,500
shares were awarded under these plans. At May 31, 2005, 59,500 shares were vested in these plans
(42,000 at May 31, 2004) subject to certain resale restrictions. Unamortized deferred compensation
expense of $3.8 million and $4.6 million at May 31, 2005, relating to restricted stock grants for
employees, is being amortized over the 10-year and 3-year vesting periods, respectively.
Gross compensation expense relating to restricted stock awards for the years ended May 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003 was $1.9 million, $1.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
Our Shareholder Rights Plan provides existing stockholders the right to purchase stock of RPM
International Inc. at a discount in certain circumstances as defined by the Plan. The rights are
not exercisable at May 31, 2005 and expire in May 2009.
We have options outstanding under two stock option plans, the 1989 Stock Option Plan and the
1996 Key Employees Stock Option Plan, the latter of which provides for the granting of options for
up to 9,000,000 shares. Stock options are granted to employees and directors at an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of RPM International Inc. stock at the date of grant. These options
are generally exercisable cumulatively in equal annual installments commencing one year from the
grant date, and have expiration dates ranging from October 2005 to October 2014. At May 31, 2005,
64,000 shares (648,000 at May 31, 2004) were available for future grant.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
43
The following table summarizes option activity under the Plans during the last three fiscal years:
| 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted | Number | Weighted | Number | Weighted | Number | |||||||||||||||||||
| Average | of Shares | Average | of Shares | Average | of Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise | Under | Exercise | Under | Exercise | Under | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares Under Option | Price | Option | Price | Option | Price | Option | ||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Prices ranging from $8.69 to $16.70)
|
$ | 13.23 | 7,403 | $ | 12.86 | 6,937 | $ | 12.57 | 6,223 | |||||||||||||||
|
Options granted
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Prices ranging from $15.15 to $17.63)
|
17.60 | 584 | 14.10 | 1,254 | 14.08 | 1,191 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Options canceled/expired
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Prices ranging from $8.81 to $17.63)
|
13.57 | (76 | ) | 12.98 | (206 | ) | 13.98 | (153 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Options exercised
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Prices ranging from $8.69 to $16.35)
|
11.53 | (1,147 | ) | 10.73 | (582 | ) | 11.33 | (324 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Prices ranging from $8.69 to $17.63)
|
$ | 13.90 | 6,764 | $ | 13.23 | 7,403 | $ | 12.86 | 6,937 | |||||||||||||||
|
Exercisable, end of year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Prices ranging from $8.69 to $16.70)
|
$ | 13.41 | 4,578 | $ | 13.15 | 4,775 | $ | 13.19 | 4,477 | |||||||||||||||
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| at May 31, 2005 | at May 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Shares in thousands) | Wtd. Avg. | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||
| Remaining | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual | Exercise | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise Price Range | Shares | Life (Years) | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||||
|
$8.00 to $9.99
|
938 | 5.3 | $ | 9.33 | 938 | $ | 9.33 | |||||||||||||
|
$10.00 to $11.99
|
194 | 6.3 | $ | 10.26 | 133 | $ | 10.26 | |||||||||||||
|
$12.00 to $14.99
|
3,213 | 6.6 | $ | 13.91 | 1,670 | $ | 13.76 | |||||||||||||
|
$15.00 to $16.99
|
1,845 | 2.7 | $ | 15.41 | 1,837 | $ | 15.41 | |||||||||||||
|
$17.00 to $17.63
|
574 | 9.4 | $ | 17.62 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
6,764 | 5.6 | $ | 13.90 | 4,578 | $ | 13.41 | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
We apply Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation,” for our stock-based employee compensation plans. As outlined in SFAS No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” we chose to apply the
modified prospective method in adopting this accounting change. Under this method, stock-based
employee compensation expense in fiscal 2005 is the same as that which would have been recognized
had the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied to account for all employee
awards from its original effective date. Results of prior periods have not been restated. See Note
A, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for the pro forma disclosures of net income and
earnings per share required under SFAS No. 123 for fiscal years 2004 and 2003.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
44
NOTE E — LEASES
We lease certain property, plant and equipment under long-term lease agreements, some of which
provide for increased rental payments based upon increases in the cost-of-living index. The
following table illustrates our future minimum lease commitments under all non-cancelable lease
agreements, for each of the next five years and in the aggregate, as of May 31, 2005:
| May 31 | ||||
| (In thousands) | ||||
|
2006
|
$ | 23,765 | ||
|
2007
|
18,412 | |||
|
2008
|
14,070 | |||
|
2009
|
7,126 | |||
|
2010
|
5,303 | |||
|
Thereafter
|
10,884 | |||
|
Total Minimum Lease Commitments
|
$ | 79,560 | ||
Total rental expense for all operating leases amounted to $29.4 million in 2005, $27.1 million
in 2004 and $24.3 million in 2003. Capitalized leases were immaterial for the three years ended May
31, 2005.
NOTE F — PENSION PLANS
We sponsor several pension plans for our employees, including our principal plan (the
“Retirement Plan”), which is a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially
all domestic non-union employees. Pension benefits are provided for certain domestic union
employees through separate plans. Employees of our foreign subsidiaries receive pension coverage,
to the extent deemed appropriate, through plans which are governed by local statutory requirements.
The measurement date used to determine pension benefit measurements for both the U.S. and non-U.S.
plans was February 28, 2005.
The Retirement Plan provides benefits that are based upon years of service and average
compensation with accrued benefits vesting after five years. Benefits for union employees are
generally based upon years of service, or years of service and average compensation. Our funding
policy is to contribute an amount on an annual basis that can be deducted for federal income tax
purposes, using a different actuarial cost method and different assumptions from those used for
financial reporting. For the fiscal year ending May 31, 2006, we expect to contribute approximately
$10.1 million to the Retirement Plans in the U.S., in addition to the approximate $2.1 million that
we expect to contribute to our foreign plans.
Net periodic pension cost (income) consisted of the following for the three years ended May 31, 2005:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$ | 11,231 | $ | 9,879 | $ | 8,904 | $ | 2,154 | $ | 1,695 | $ | 1,168 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
7,481 | 7,228 | 6,634 | 4,359 | 3,612 | 2,344 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(9,759 | ) | (7,385 | ) | (7,769 | ) | (4,117 | ) | (3,188 | ) | (2,748 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Amortization of:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prior service cost
|
294 | 294 | 197 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net gain on adoption of SFAS No. 87
|
(3 | ) | (23 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net actuarial (gains) losses recognized
|
1,500 | 2,542 | 952 | 1,394 | 1,237 | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Curtailment/settlement (gains) losses
|
11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Pension Cost
|
$ | 10,744 | $ | 12,535 | $ | 8,844 | $ | 3,790 | $ | 3,356 | $ | 1,088 | ||||||||||||
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
45
The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets, as well as the funded status of our
pension plans at May 31, 2005 and 2004, were as follows:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 128,666 | $ | 112,271 | $ | 77,533 | $ | 59,588 | ||||||||
|
Service cost
|
11,231 | 9,879 | 2,154 | 1,695 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
7,481 | 7,228 | 4,359 | 3,612 | ||||||||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(9,730 | ) | (10,696 | ) | (2,723 | ) | (2,304 | ) | ||||||||
|
Participant contributions
|
681 | 585 | ||||||||||||||
|
Acquisitions and new plans
|
755 | |||||||||||||||
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
10,857 | 9,984 | 2,487 | 3,477 | ||||||||||||
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
4,699 | 10,125 | ||||||||||||||
|
Benefit Obligation at End of Year
|
$ | 148,505 | $ | 128,666 | $ | 89,190 | $ | 77,533 | ||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 109,920 | $ | 88,669 | $ | 56,377 | $ | 41,674 | ||||||||
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
5,031 | 28,800 | 4,316 | 6,328 | ||||||||||||
|
Employer contributions
|
12,870 | 3,147 | 3,642 | 2,895 | ||||||||||||
|
Participant contributions
|
681 | 585 | ||||||||||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(9,730 | ) | (10,696 | ) | (2,723 | ) | (2,304 | ) | ||||||||
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
3,630 | 7,199 | ||||||||||||||
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets at End of Year
|
$ | 118,091 | $ | 109,920 | $ | 65,923 | $ | 56,377 | ||||||||
|
(Deficit) of plan assets versus benefit obligations
at end of year
|
$ | (30,414 | ) | $ | (18,746 | ) | $ | (23,267 | ) | $ | (21,156 | ) | ||||
|
Contributions after measurement date
|
4 | 2,533 | 183 | 472 | ||||||||||||
|
Unrecognized actuarial (gains) losses
|
47,992 | 33,907 | 28,826 | 26,406 | ||||||||||||
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
2,546 | 2,840 | ||||||||||||||
|
Unrecognized net transitional asset
|
(2 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Net Amount Recognized
|
$ | 20,126 | $ | 20,529 | $ | 5,742 | $ | 5,722 | ||||||||
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
$ | 20,369 | $ | 21,107 | $ | 8,676 | $ | 7,350 | ||||||||
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
(755 | ) | (663 | ) | (11,260 | ) | (10,878 | ) | ||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
481 | 85 | 8,326 | 9,250 | ||||||||||||
|
Intangible asset
|
31 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net Amount Recognized
|
$ | 20,126 | $ | 20,529 | $ | 5,742 | $ | 5,722 | ||||||||
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
|
$ | 114,553 | $ | 100,323 | $ | 76,706 | $ | 67,238 | ||||||||
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
46
The following table summarizes the relationship between our plans’ benefit obligations and
assets.
| U.S. Plans | ||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
| Benefit | Plan | Benefit | Plan | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Obligation | Assets | Obligation | Assets | ||||||||||||
|
Plans with projected benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets
|
$ | 145,633 | $ | 114,840 | $ | 124,704 | $ | 104,891 | ||||||||
|
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets
|
$ | 1,757 | $ | 998 | $ | 667 | ||||||||||
|
Plans with assets in excess of projected
benefit obligations
|
$ | 2,872 | $ | 3,251 | $ | 3,962 | $ | 5,029 | ||||||||
|
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated
benefit obligations
|
$ | 112,796 | $ | 117,093 | $ | 99,655 | $ | 109,920 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. Plans | ||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
| Benefit | Plan | Benefit | Plan | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Obligation | Assets | Obligation | Assets | ||||||||||||
|
Plans with projected benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets
|
$ | 89,190 | $ | 65,923 | $ | 77,533 | $ | 56,377 | ||||||||
|
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets
|
$ | 48,839 | $ | 37,396 | $ | 43,705 | $ | 32,403 | ||||||||
|
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated
benefit obligations
|
$ | 27,867 | $ | 28,527 | $ | 23,533 | $ | 23,973 | ||||||||
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets assumption, we
consider the current and expected target asset allocations of the pension portfolio, as well as
historical returns and future expectations for returns on various categories of plan assets. The
following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our year-end benefit obligations and
net periodic pension cost under the plans:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year-End Benefit Obligations | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Discount rate
|
5.75 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.70 | % | 5.40 | % | 5.65 | % | 6.43 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.50 | % | 3.50 | % | 4.00 | % | 3.63 | % | 3.48 | % | 3.95 | % | ||||||||||||
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Periodic Pension Cost | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Discount rate
|
6.00 | % | 6.70 | % | 7.25 | % | 5.68 | % | 6.43 | % | 6.63 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
8.75 | % | 8.75 | % | 9.00 | % | 7.31 | % | 7.25 | % | 8.25 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.50 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.95 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The following tables illustrate the weighted average actual and target allocation of plan assets:
| U.S. Plans | ||||||||||||
| Actual Asset | ||||||||||||
| Target Allocation | Allocation | |||||||||||
| as of February 2005 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
70 | % | 70 | % | 70 | % | ||||||
|
Fixed income securities
|
25 | % | 16 | % | 21 | % | ||||||
|
Cash
|
9 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||
|
Other
|
5 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Non-U.S. Plans | ||||||||||||
| Actual Asset | ||||||||||||
| Target Allocation | Allocation | |||||||||||
| as of February 2005 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
58 | % | 58 | % | 59 | % | ||||||
|
Fixed income securities
|
37 | % | 36 | % | 38 | % | ||||||
|
Cash
|
1 | % | 2 | % | 1 | % | ||||||
|
Property and other
|
4 | % | 4 | % | 2 | % | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
47
The primary objective for the investments of the Retirement Plan is to provide for
long-term growth of capital without undue exposure to risk. This is accomplished by utilizing a
strategy of equities, fixed income securities and cash equivalents in a mix that is conducive to
participation in a rising market while allowing for adequate protection in a falling market. The
Plan Investment Committee oversees the investment allocation process, which includes the selection
and evaluation of investment managers, the determination of investment objectives and risk
guidelines, and the monitoring of actual investment performance. In order to properly manage
investment risk, plan policy prohibits short selling, securities lending, financial futures,
options and other specialized investments except for certain alternative investments specifically
approved by the Investment Committee. The Investment Committee reviews, on a quarterly basis,
reports of actual plan investment performance provided by independent third parties, in addition to
their review of the plan investment policy on an annual basis.
Outside the U.S., the investment objectives are similar, subject to local regulations. In
general, investments are managed by private investment managers, reporting to our Investment
Committee on a regular basis.
In addition to the defined benefit pension plans discussed above, we also sponsor employee
savings plans under Section 401 (k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which cover many employees in the
United States. The majority of the plans provide for matching contributions based upon qualified
employee contributions. Matching contributions are invested in the same manner that the
participants invest their own contributions. Matching contributions charged to income were $8.2
million, $7.8 million and $6.1 million for years ending May 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company expects to pay the following estimated pension benefit payments in the next five
years (in millions): $10.1 in 2006; $11.6 in 2007; $13.2 in 2008; $14.9 in 2009; $14.7 in 2010. In
the five years thereafter (2011-2015) the Company expects to pay $99.3 million.
NOTE G — POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE BENEFITS
We sponsor several unfunded health care benefit plans for certain of our retired employees.
Eligibility for these benefits is based upon minimum age and service requirements. The following
table illustrates the effect on operations of these plans for the three years ended May 31, 2005:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost — Benefits earned during this period
|
$ | 11 | $ | 11 | $ | 9 | $ | 265 | $ | 205 | $ | 168 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost on the accumulated obligation
|
661 | 634 | 649 | 473 | 396 | 325 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of unrecognized (gains) losses
|
27 | (47 | ) | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Periodic Postretirement Expense
|
$ | 699 | $ | 645 | $ | 611 | $ | 766 | $ | 601 | $ | 493 | ||||||||||||
The changes in the benefit obligations of the plans at May 31, 2005 and 2004 were as
follows:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at
beginning of year
|
$ | 11,465 | $ | 9,884 | $ | 6,815 | $ | 4,970 | ||||||||
|
Service cost
|
11 | 11 | 265 | 205 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
661 | 634 | 473 | 396 | ||||||||||||
|
Benefit payments
|
(1,013 | ) | (908 | ) | (122 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||||
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
353 | 1,844 | 333 | 822 | ||||||||||||
|
Amendments
|
(308 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
567 | 551 | ||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at
end of year
|
11,169 | 11,465 | 8,331 | 6,815 | ||||||||||||
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)
|
(1,796 | ) | (1,470 | ) | (1,542 | ) | (1,142 | ) | ||||||||
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
308 | |||||||||||||||
|
Accrued Postretirement Health Care Benefits
|
$ | 9,681 | $ | 9,995 | $ | 6,789 | $ | 5,673 | ||||||||
Measurement dates of May 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were used to determine
postretirement benefit measurements outlined above.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
48
The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our year-end benefit
obligations and net periodic postretirement benefit costs under the plans:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year-End Benefit Obligations | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Discount rate
|
5.75 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.70 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 7.00 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Current healthcare cost trend rate
|
10.00 | % | 10.00 | % | 9.00 | % | 8.00 | % | 9.00 | % | 9.00 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
|
5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
will be realized
|
2015 | 2014 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Discount rate
|
6.00 | % | 6.70 | % | 7.25 | % | 6.25 | % | 7.00 | % | 7.25 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Healthcare cost trend rate
|
10.00 | % | 9.00 | % | 8.00 | % | 9.00 | % | 9.00 | % | 9.00 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
|
5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
will be realized
|
2014 | 2007 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Increasing or decreasing current healthcare cost trend rates by 1% would affect
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net postretirement expense by the following
amounts for the years ended May 31, 2005 and 2004:
| U.S. Plans | Non-U.S. Plans | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
|
1% Increase in trend rate
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
|
$ | 950 | $ | 980 | $ | 1,617 | $ | 1,423 | ||||||||
|
Postretirement Cost
|
60 | 50 | 163 | 135 | ||||||||||||
|
1% Decrease in trend rate
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
|
(830 | ) | (850 | ) | (1,262 | ) | (1,177 | ) | ||||||||
|
Postretirement Cost
|
(50 | ) | (50 | ) | (123 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||||||
The Company expects to pay approximately $1.0 million in estimated postretirement
benefit expense in each of the next five years. In the five years thereafter (2011-2015) the
Company expects to pay $5.3 million.
We have determined that our postretirement medical plan provides prescription drug benefits
that will qualify for the federal subsidy provided by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement
and Modernization Act of 2003 (“Act”). For our current retirees who are not subject to cost caps,
we have assumed that we will be eligible for the subsidy beginning in 2006 and for all future
years. For our current and future retirees who are subject to cost caps, we have assumed that we
will be eligible for the subsidy beginning in 2006 and ending on average in 2012.
We have reflected the impact of the Act for the first time in the fiscal year end 2005
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (“APBO”). We have reflected the change in the APBO as
an actuarial gain in accordance with FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2. The impact will be
reflected net of periodic expense for the first time beginning with the quarter ended August 31,
2005.
NOTE H — CONTINGENCIES AND LOSS RESERVES
Accrued loss reserves and asbestos-related liabilities consist of the following:
| May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
|
Accrued product liability reserves
|
$ | 57,414 | $ | 47,402 | ||||
|
Accrued warranty reserves
|
5,822 | 5,670 | ||||||
|
Accrued environmental reserves
|
2,216 | 3,627 | ||||||
|
Accrued loss reserves — current
|
65,452 | 56,699 | ||||||
|
Asbestos-related liabilities — current
|
55,000 | 47,500 | ||||||
|
Total Reserves — Current
|
$ | 120,452 | $ | 104,199 | ||||
|
Accrued warranty and product
liability reserves — noncurrent
|
$ | 8,044 | $ | 5,579 | ||||
|
Asbestos-related
liabilities —
noncurrent
|
46,172 | 43,107 | ||||||
|
Total Reserves — Noncurrent
|
$ | 54,216 | $ | 48,686 | ||||
We provide, through our wholly owned insurance subsidiaries, certain insurance coverage,
primarily product liability, to our other subsidiaries. Excess coverage is provided by outside
carriers. The reserves reflected above
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
49
provide for these potential losses as well as other uninsured claims. In fiscal 2005, product
liability reserves increased to $57.4 million, or by approximately $10.0 million, as a result of
our continuing evaluation of our liability under a preliminarily court-approved class action
lawsuit settlement covering our Dryvit exterior insulated finish systems product line. The Dryvit
reserve increase was $16.2 million. The liability was substantially covered by excess coverage from
outside insurance carriers, and offsetting receivables were recorded and are reflected as current
and long-term receivables. The increase in the accrual in 2005 relating to the class action lawsuit
had no impact on our statement of income as a result of the outside insurance funding. This accrual
increase is expected to bring us nearer to closure on the class action lawsuit.
Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries, principally Bondex International, Inc. (“Bondex”),
along with many other U.S. companies, are and have been involved in a large number of
asbestos-related suits filed primarily in state courts during the past two decades, with a majority
of claims pending in five states – Illinois, Ohio, Mississippi, Texas and Florida. These suits
principally allege personal injury resulting from exposure to asbestos-containing products
previously manufactured by the Company’s subsidiaries. The alleged claims relate primarily to
products that Bondex or its predecessors sold through 1977. In many cases, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that
they have suffered any compensable loss as a result of such exposure, or that injuries incurred
resulted from exposure to Bondex products.
The rate at which plaintiffs filed asbestos-related suits against Bondex increased in the
fourth quarter of 2002 and the first two quarters of 2003, influenced by the bankruptcy filings of
numerous other defendants in asbestos-related litigation. Based on the significant increase in
asbestos claims activity which, in many cases, disproportionately increased Bondex’s exposure in
joint and several liability law states, our third-party insurance was depleted within the first
quarter of 2004, as previously reported. Our third-party insurers historically had been
responsible, under various cost-sharing arrangements, for the payment of approximately 90% of the
indemnity and defense costs associated with our asbestos litigation. Prior to this sudden
precipitous increase in loss rates, the combination of book loss reserves and insurance coverage
was expected to adequately fund asbestos loss payments for the foreseeable future. We have reserved
our rights with respect to various of our third-party insurers’ claims of exhaustion, and in late
calendar
2002 commenced reviewing our known insurance policies to determine whether or not other insurance
limits may be available to cover our asbestos liabilities.
As a result of this examination and as previously disclosed, certain of our subsidiaries filed
a complaint for declaratory judgment, breach of contract and bad faith against various third party
insurers challenging their assertion that their policies covering asbestos-related claims have been
exhausted. Since the July 3, 2003 filing in Ohio, this action was consolidated with a related case
and, pursuant to a case management order, the parties are to complete fact discovery by March 31,
2006 and dispositive motions and expert discovery by September 1, 2006. A trial date of January 29,
2007 has been set; however, it is possible that this and other dates may be modified as the
coverage case progresses.
We are unable at the present time to predict the timing or ultimate outcome of this insurance
coverage litigation. Consequently, we are unable to predict whether, or to what extent, any
additional insurance may be available to cover a portion of our subsidiaries’ asbestos liabilities.
We have not included any potential benefits from this litigation either in our financial statements
or in calculating our asbestos reserve. Our wholly-owned captive insurance companies have not
provided any insurance or re-insurance coverage of any asbestos-related claims.
During 2003 and early fiscal 2004, new state liability laws were enacted in three states
(Mississippi, Ohio and Texas) where at that time more than 80% of the claims against Bondex were
pending. Effective dates for the last two of the law changes were April 8, 2003 and July 1, 2003.
The changes generally provided for liability to be determined on a “proportional cause” basis,
thereby limiting Bondex’s responsibility to only its share of the alleged asbestos exposure. During
the third and fourth fiscal quarters of 2004, two of the three previously mentioned states that
adopted “proportional cause” liability in 2003 passed additional legislation impacting medical
criteria and product identification in asbestos-related litigation. In 2005, additional states
including Florida and Georgia, have adopted various medical criteria-based asbestos legislation.
While there have been some changes in the type of claims filed in certain of these states, the
ultimate influence these law changes may have on future claims activity and settlement values is
not known at this time. Claims in Mississippi, Ohio and Texas at the year ended May 31, 2005,
coupled with the non-malignancy filings in Florida, currently comprise approximately 80% of the
aggregate claims filed against Bondex.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
50
At the end of 2002 and through the third fiscal quarter of 2003, Bondex had concluded it
was not possible to estimate the cost of disposing all of the asbestos-related claims that might be
filed against Bondex in the future due to a number of reasons, including its lack of sufficient
comparable loss history from which to assess either the number or value of any future
asbestos-related claims. As previously disclosed, during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2003, Bondex
retained a consulting firm to assist in analyzing its loss history data, to evaluate whether it
would be possible to estimate the cost of disposing pending claims in light of both past and recent
loss history, and to assist in determining whether future asbestos-related claims reasonably
expected to be filed against Bondex were measurable, given recent changes in various state laws and
the prospect of potential federal asbestos-related legislation.
Bondex provided the consultants with all relevant data regarding asbestos-related claims filed
against Bondex through May 31, 2003. Management, with the consultants’ input, concluded that it was
not possible to currently estimate the full range of the cost of resolving all future
asbestos-related claims against Bondex. Estimating the future cost of asbestos-related contingent
liabilities was and continues to be subject to many uncertainties, including (i) the ultimate
number of claims filed; (ii) the cost of resolving both current known and future unknown claims;
(iii) the amount of insurance, if any, available to cover such claims, including the outcome of
coverage litigation against the subsidiaries’ third party insurers; (iv) future earnings and cash
flow of the Company’s subsidiaries; (v) the impact of bankruptcies of other companies whose share
of liability may be imposed on the Company’s subsidiaries under certain state liability laws; (vi)
the unpredictable aspects of the litigation process including a changing trial docket and the
jurisdictions in which trials are scheduled; (vii) the outcome of any such trials including
judgments or jury verdicts, as a result of our more aggressive defense posture which includes
taking selective cases to verdict; (viii) the lack of specific information in many cases concerning
exposure to the subsidiaries’ products and the claimants’ diseases; (ix) potential changes in
applicable federal and/or state law; and (x) the potential impact of various proposed structured
settlement transactions or subsidiary bankruptcies by other companies, some of which are the
subject of federal appellate court review, the outcome of which could materially affect any future
asbestos-related liability estimates. In addition, during both calendar years 2003 and 2005,
passage by the United States Senate Judiciary Committee of proposed
legislation to establish a trust fund to pay future asbestos related claims and remove such cases
from federal and state courts with industry and insurers funding the trust continues to be a
significant variable that has made it increasingly difficult to predict with certainty the full
exposure of future, unknown asbestos-related claims. The ongoing prospect of federal trust fund
legislation is expected to continue to be a significant variable in assessing our future
asbestos-related liabilities.
Based on the foregoing considerations, at May 31, 2003, we concluded that we could not fully
estimate the liability that would result from all future asbestos claims. We established a reserve
for those pending cases that had progressed to a stage where the cost to dispose of these cases
could, at the time, reasonably be estimated, as well as a $51.2 million provision for future
unasserted claims that were estimable at May 31, 2003. The estimation of even pending cases was and
is always difficult due to the dynamic nature of asbestos litigation including the variables
discussed above. The estimated range of potential loss covering measurable known asbestos claims
and the provision for future claims that were estimable at May 31, 2003 was $140.0 million to
$145.0 million. Accordingly, we established a reserve equal to the lower end of this range of
potential loss by taking an asbestos charge to fiscal 2003 operations of $140.0 million. At the
time of the reserve, we believed that this asbestos reserve would be sufficient to cover
asbestos-related cash flow requirements over the estimated three-year life of the reserve. The
$140.0 million charge also included $15.0 million in total projected defense costs over the
estimated three-year life of the reserve. By comparison, Bondex’s share of costs (net of
then-available third-party insurance) for asbestos-related product liability was $6.7 million and
$2.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Since May 31, 2003, we have reviewed and evaluated on a quarterly basis the adequacy of our
asbestos reserve. The range of loss calculation for the $140 million reserve was based on an
extensive analysis of the most critical factors that influence our asbestos-related costs
including: (i) the gross number of open malignancy claims (principally mesothelioma claims) as
these claims have the most significant impact on our asbestos settlement costs; (ii) historical and
current settlement costs and dismissal rates by various categories; (iii) analysis of the
jurisdiction and governing law of the states in which these claims are pending; (iv) and outside
defense counsel’s opinions and recommendations
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
51
with respect to the merits of such claims. Although the number of open malignancy claims has
remained relatively constant, subject to some quarterly variability, since May 31, 2003 continuing
through the year ended May 31, 2005, our average settlement costs for malignancy claims have
declined and dismissal rates have increased. Several defense verdicts during the second half of
fiscal 2004 further contributed to lower settlement values and higher dismissal rates. Our defense
costs, however, have increased significantly as a result of our more aggressive defense strategy,
which now includes taking selective cases to verdict.
Based on our review of our asbestos reserve for the second quarter ended November 30, 2004, we
concluded that the $56.0 million balance of the $140.0 million reserve would not likely be
sufficient to cover our asbestos-related cash flow requirements for the remainder of the full
three-year period originally contemplated by the reserve. Accordingly, we concluded that an
increase in our existing reserve was appropriate and took an asbestos reserve adjustment of $47.0
million for the quarter ended November 30, 2004, which we believed would be sufficient to cover any
incremental cash flow requirements through fiscal 2006 not covered by the $140.0 million reserve,
as well as the additional cash flow requirements for the balance of our then pending known claims
and anticipated higher defense costs. Approximately $32.0 million of the $47.0 million reserve
adjustment was allocated to anticipated higher future defense costs. During the third fiscal
quarter ended February 28, 2005, based on a review of our pending known claims coupled with a
review of our defense costs, we concluded that an increase in our existing reserve was appropriate.
An asbestos reserve adjustment of $15.0 million was taken for the quarter ended February 28, 2005.
With cash outlays of $21.9 million in the third quarter, our asbestos reserves aggregated $96.3
million at February 28, 2005, which we believed would be sufficient to cover the cash flow
requirements for the balance of our then-pending known claims and defense costs. Our $15.0 million
reserve increase assumed that approximately $6.1 million will be allocated to anticipated higher
future defense costs, which we expected to continue.
During the fourth quarter ended May 31, 2005, an additional $16.0 million was added to the
asbestos reserve based on management’s quarterly review of pending claims and defense costs. With
cash outlays of $11.1 million in the quarter, our asbestos reserves aggregate $101.2 million at May
31, 2005, which we believe will be sufficient to cover the cash flow requirements for the balance
of our pending
known claims and defense costs. Of the $16.0 million reserve increase, approximately $15.8 million
is expected to be allocated to anticipated higher future defense costs, which we expect to
continue. As we review our asbestos reserve each quarter, we will make appropriate adjustments to
the reserve based on our most recent experience to ensure that it is sufficient to cover the
anticipated settlement and defense costs associated with our then pending, known claims. We will
continue to evaluate the appropriateness of estimating the value of any potential future unknown
asbestos claims and at such time as we are able to quantify such future exposure, we will establish
a reserve for such unknown future claims.
We recognize that future facts, events and legislation, both state and/or federal, may alter
our estimates of both pending and future claims. We cannot estimate possible liabilities in excess
of those accrued because we cannot predict the number of additional claims that may be filed in the
future, the grounds for such claims, the potential settlement values associated with any such
future claims, the ultimate resolution of such claims, the full impact of the state law changes
enumerated above or the effect of pending federal trust fund legislation on future asbestos claims.
Subject to the foregoing variables, including the timing and impact of such variables and the
increase in the asbestos reserve, we believe that our asbestos reserves are sufficient to cover
asbestos-related cash flow requirements for the current inventory of our known claims. It is,
however, reasonably possible that our actual costs for claims could differ from current estimates
but, based upon information presently available, such costs are not expected to have a material
effect on our competitive or financial position or our ongoing operations. As previously disclosed,
however, our existing reserve will not presently cover the costs of future unknown claims and
therefore, additional reserves will be required in future periods for any such future claims. Any
such future reserve increases, when taken, could have a material impact on our results in such
period.
The Company will continue to evaluate its asbestos-related loss exposure each quarter and
review the adequacy of its reserve and the related cash flow implications in light of our most
recent actual claims experience, the impact of state law changes and the evolving nature of federal
legislative efforts to address asbestos litigation. We will continue to explore all feasible
alternatives available to resolve our asbestos-related exposure in a manner consistent with the
best interests of our stockholders.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
52
The following table illustrates the movement of current and long-term asbestos-related
liabilities for the three years ended May 31, 2005:
| Additions | ||||||||||||||||
| Charged to | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at | Selling, General | Deductions | Balance at | |||||||||||||
| Beginning | and | (Primarily | End of | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | of Period | Administrative | Claims Paid) | Year | ||||||||||||
|
Year Ended May 31, 2005
|
$ | 90,607 | $ | 78,000 | $ | 67,435 | $ | 101,172 | ||||||||
|
Year Ended May 31, 2004
|
144,583 | 53,976 (a) | 90,607 | |||||||||||||
|
Year Ended May 31, 2003
|
3,377 | 146,650 | 5,444 (b) | 144,583 | ||||||||||||
| (a) | Represents the Company’s portion of total claims paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 of $63.4 million, net of insurer contributions totaling $9.4 million. Insurance coverage was depleted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. | |
| (b) | Represents the Company’s portion of total claims paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 of $54.4 million, net of insurer contributions totaling $49.0 million. |
In addition, like others in similar businesses, we are involved in several
proceedings relating to environmental matters. It is our policy to accrue remediation costs when it
is probable that such efforts will be required and the related costs can be reasonably estimated.
These liabilities are undiscounted. Provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time
of sale and periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the loss reserve estimation process, we are unable to
estimate an additional range of loss in excess of our accruals. It is at least reasonably possible
that actual costs will differ from estimates, but, based upon information presently available, such
future costs are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our competitive or financial
position or our ongoing results of operations. However, such costs could be material to results of
operations in a future period.
NOTE I — SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate a portfolio of businesses that manufacture and sell a variety of specialty paints,
protective coatings and roofing systems, sealants and adhesives. We manage our portfolio by
organizing our businesses into two operating segments — industrial and consumer — based on the nature
of business activities, products and services; the structure of management; and the structure of
information as presented to our Board of Directors. Within each segment, individual operating
companies or groups of companies generally address common markets, utilize similar technologies,
and can share manufacturing or distribution capabilities.
In addition to two operating segments, there are certain business activities, referred to as
corporate/other, that do not constitute an operating segment, including corporate headquarters and
related administrative expenses, results of our captive insurance companies, gains or losses on the
sales of certain assets and other expenses not directly associated with either operating segment.
Related assets consist primarily of investments, prepaid expenses, deferred pension assets, and
headquarters property and equipment. These corporate and other assets and expenses reconcile
operating segment data to total consolidated net sales, income before income taxes, identifiable
assets, capital expenditures, and depreciation and amortization.
The ten largest consumer segment customers represented approximately 25%, 25% and 24% of our
consolidated net sales and approximately 57%, 55% and 53% of consumer net sales for 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively. Sales to The Home Depot represented 11%, 11% and 11% of our consolidated net
sales and 26%, 25% and 24% of our consumer segment net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
We reflect income from our joint ventures on the equity method, and receive royalties from our
licensees. Total income from royalties and joint ventures amounted to approximately 2% or less of
income before income taxes for each of the periods presented, and is therefore included as an
offset to selling, general and administrative expenses. Export sales amounted to less than 10% of
net sales for each of the three years presented.
The following table reflects the results of our operating segments consistent with our
management philosophy, and represents the information we utilize, in conjunction with various
strategic, operational and other financial performance criteria, in evaluating the performance of
our portfolio of businesses.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
53
| Year Ended May 31 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
|
Segment Information
|
||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial
|
$ | 1,441,548 | $ | 1,272,781 | $ | 1,117,877 | ||||||
|
Consumer
|
1,114,187 | 1,034,772 | 935,605 | |||||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,555,735 | $ | 2,307,553 | $ | 2,053,482 | ||||||
|
Income
Before Income Taxes
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial
|
$ | 168,578 | $ | 140,706 | $ | 122,568 | ||||||
|
Consumer
|
147,601 | 142,852 | 131,100 | |||||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
(152,451 | ) | (65,942 | ) | (205,815 | ) | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 163,728 | $ | 217,616 | $ | 47,853 | ||||||
|
Identifiable Assets
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial
|
$ | 1,271,145 | $ | 1,111,978 | $ | 1,067,921 | ||||||
|
Consumer
|
1,138,894 | 1,090,531 | 1,038,350 | |||||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
246,206 | 147,582 | 137,184 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,656,245 | $ | 2,350,091 | $ | 2,243,455 | ||||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial
|
$ | 30,714 | $ | 26,043 | $ | 18,741 | ||||||
|
Consumer
|
24,175 | 23,303 | 22,095 | |||||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
720 | 1,907 | 978 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 55,609 | $ | 51,253 | $ | 41,814 | ||||||
|
Depreciation and
Amortization
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrial
|
$ | 33,213 | $ | 30,764 | $ | 27,537 | ||||||
|
Consumer
|
29,264 | 29,503 | 29,216 | |||||||||
|
Corporate/Other
|
3,515 | 3,010 | 1,921 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 65,992 | $ | 63,277 | $ | 58,674 | ||||||
|
Geographic Information
|
||||||||||||
|
Net Sales (based on
shipping location)
|
||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$ | 2,009,748 | $ | 1,841,837 | $ | 1,655,609 | ||||||
|
Foreign
|
||||||||||||
|
Canada
|
192,579 | 172,894 | 144,882 | |||||||||
|
Europe
|
250,585 | 207,557 | 175,657 | |||||||||
|
Other Foreign
|
102,823 | 85,265 | 77,334 | |||||||||
|
Total Foreign
|
545,987 | 465,716 | 397,873 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,555,735 | $ | 2,307,553 | $ | 2,053,482 | ||||||
|
Assets Employed
|
||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$ | 2,167,285 | $ | 1,884,387 | $ | 1,827,910 | ||||||
|
Foreign
|
||||||||||||
|
Canada
|
205,433 | 154,815 | 151,771 | |||||||||
|
Europe
|
266,564 | 242,063 | 197,654 | |||||||||
|
Other Foreign
|
16,963 | 68,826 | 66,120 | |||||||||
|
Total Foreign
|
488,960 | 465,704 | 415,545 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,656,245 | $ | 2,350,091 | $ | 2,243,455 | ||||||
NOTE J — QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended May 31,
2005 and 2004:
| For Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
August 31 | November 30 | February 28 | May 31 | ||||||||||||
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
$ | 661,513 | $ | 623,469 | $ | 516,337 | $ | 754,416 | ||||||||
|
Gross Profit
|
$ | 294,887 | $ | 270,688 | $ | 211,117 | $ | 329,859 | ||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 54,486 | $ | 9,112 | $ | (4,772 | ) | $ | 46,206 | |||||||
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.39 | |||||||
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
(a)
|
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.04 | ) (b) | $ | 0.37 | |||||||
|
Dividends Per Share
|
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
| For Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | August 31 | November 30 | February 29 | May 31 | ||||||||||||
|
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
(c)
|
$ | 581,023 | $ | 581,541 | $ | 473,978 | $ | 671,011 | ||||||||
|
Gross Profit
(c)
|
$ | 267,043 | $ | 257,575 | $ | 203,803 | $ | 302,760 | ||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 47,672 | $ | 35,223 | $ | 6,018 | $ | 52,973 | ||||||||
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.46 | ||||||||
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
(a)
|
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
|
Dividends Per Share
|
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
| (a) | Includes dilutive effect of EITF 04-8 as discussed in Note D. | |
| (b) | Dilutive effects of our contingently convertible debt not included as it would be anti-dilutive. | |
| (c) | See cooperative advertising reclassifications as discussed in Note A. |
Quarterly earnings per share may not total to the yearly earnings per share due to the
weighted average number of shares outstanding in each quarter.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
54
NOTE K — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 22, 2005, our Tremco subsidiary entered into a definitive purchase agreement to
acquire Illbruck Sealant Systems (“Illbruck”). Illbruck, located in Leverkusen, Germany, is a
provider of high-performance sealant and
installation systems. With sales of $190.0 million, the acquisition will increase RPM’s global presence in core waterproofing and sealants system technologies.
The acquisition is expected to be finalized by early September, pending appropriate European
government approval at which point
Illbruck will be a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
QUARTERLY STOCK PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
RPM shares of common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RPM.
The high and low sales prices for the shares of common stock, and the cash dividends paid on the
common stock, for each quarter of the two most recent fiscal years are set forth in the table
below.
Range of Sales Prices and Dividends Paid
| Fiscal 2005 | High | Low | Dividends paid per share | |||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 16.02 | $ | 13.85 | $0.140 | |||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 18.99 | $ | 15.71 | $0.150 | |||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 19.95 | $ | 17.58 | $0.150 | |||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 19.25 | $ | 16.51 | $0.150 | |||||||
| Fiscal 2004 | High | Low | Dividends paid per share | |||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 14.20 | $ | 12.28 | $0.130 | |||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 15.28 | $ | 12.90 | $0.140 | |||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 17.24 | $ | 14.93 | $0.140 | |||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 17.00 | $ | 13.29 | $0.140 | |||||||
Source:
The Wall Street Journal
Cash dividends are payable quarterly, upon authorization of the Board of Directors. Regular
payment dates are approximately the last day of July, October, January and April.
The number of holders of record of RPM common stock as of August 1, 2005 was approximately 35,278.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
55
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS
The management of RPM International Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company, as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). RPM’s internal control
system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of RPM’s internal control over financial reporting as of
May 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control — Integrated
Framework.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 31, 2005, RPM’s internal
control over financial reporting is effective.
Ciulla, Smith & Dale, LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements of RPM
International Inc. as of and for the year ended May 31, 2005, have also audited management’s
assessment of internal control over financial reporting and issued a report which is included
herein.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Frank C. Sullivan
|
Robert L. Matejka | |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller | |
| July 7, 2005 |
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
56
57
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
Medina, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RPM International Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May
31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Company. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2005, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of May 31, 2005, based on the criteria established
in
Internal Control — Integrated
Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated July 7, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Cleveland, Ohio
July 7, 2005, except as to Note K, which is as of July 22, 2005.
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
58
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries
Medina, Ohio
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” that RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
“Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2005 based
on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including
the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of May 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
the criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2005,
based on the criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of RPM International Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31,
2005, and our report dated July 7, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements.
Ciulla, Smith & Dale, LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
July 7, 2005
RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries