UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
.
Commission File Number: 0-25092
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
86-0766246
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
1305 West Auto Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85284
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(480) 902-1001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title
of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
None
|
|
N/A
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common stock, par value $0.01
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report(s)), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
þ
Accelerated Filer
o
Non-accelerated Filer
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
of the Registrant, based upon the closing price of the Registrants common stock as reported on the
Nasdaq National Market on June 30, 2005, the last business day of the Registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter, was $960,534,199.
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrants common stock on February 10, 2006 was
48,013,356.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement relating to its 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements in Business
in Item 1 and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Item 7 of this report, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include:
projections of matters that affect net sales, gross profit, operating expenses, earnings from
operations, non-operating income and expenses or net earnings; projections of capital expenditures
and growth; hiring plans; plans for future operations; the availability of financing and our needs
or plans relating thereto; plans relating to our products and services; the effect of new
accounting principles; benefits and expenses relating to restructuring activities and employee
terminations; the effect of guaranty and indemnification obligations; the actual or expected
outcome of legal proceedings against the Company; statements of belief; and statements of
assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to
risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual
results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the
forward-looking statement. Some of the important factors that could cause our actual results to
differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, the following:
|
|
|
changes in the information technology industry and/or the economic environment;
|
|
|
|
|
our reliance on suppliers for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing
incentives and competitive products to sell;
|
|
|
|
|
actions of our competitors, including manufacturers of products we sell;
|
|
|
|
|
disruptions in our information technology and voice and data networks;
|
|
|
|
|
our reliance on a limited number of outsourcing clients;
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with the terms and conditions of our public sector contracts;
|
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with international operations;
|
|
|
|
|
our dependence on key personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
the decreased effectiveness of equity compensation resulting from changes in
accounting for equity compensation;
|
|
|
|
|
our integration and operation of future acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in product standards;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew or replace short-term financing facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
intellectual property infringement claims; and
|
|
|
|
|
risks that are otherwise described from time to time in the reports that we file
with the SEC, including, but not limited to, the items discussed in Risk Factors
in Item 1A of this report.
|
We assume no obligation to update, and do not intend to update, any forward-looking statements.
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
Year Ended December 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Insight Enterprises, Inc. is a holding company organized in the following three operating
segments
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 2005
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Earnings from
|
Operating Segment*
|
|
Description
|
|
Geography
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Operations
|
Insight North America
|
|
Provider of information technology
|
|
United States and
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
(IT) products and services
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
Provider of IT products and services
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
Business process outsourcing provider
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
Additional detailed segment and geographic information can be found in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 and in Note 16
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
|
Our business focus is on being a leading provider of brand name computing products, IT
services and outsourcing of business processes primarily to business clients in the United States,
Canada and the United Kingdom.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1991 as the successor to an Arizona corporation that
commenced operations in 1988. We began operations in the United States, expanded into Canada in
1997 and into the United Kingdom in 1998.
Acquisitions/Dispositions History
Over the past few years, we have completed acquisitions in the United States, Canada and
the United Kingdom.
In 2004, we sold our 95% ownership interest in PlusNet plc (PlusNet), an Internet service
provider in the United Kingdom. As a result of the disposition of our ownership interest, PlusNet
is disclosed as a discontinued operation for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Operating Segments
The following discussions of our operating segments should be read in conjunction with
the operating segment disclosures and information regarding geographic operations found in Note 16
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. A discussion of factors
potentially affecting our operations is discussed in Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report.
Insight North America and Insight UK The Insight Brand
Insight North America and Insight UK (collectively, Insight) are reported as separate
operating segments. However, they both market products and services principally under the global
brand name Insight and operate with similarly structured business models and strategic
positioning as leading providers of IT products and services.
Insight North America, with operations in the United States and Canada, is our primary
operating segment, representing 83% of consolidated net sales and earnings from operations in 2005.
Insight UK represented 15% and 6% of consolidated net sales and earnings from operations,
respectively, in 2005. The target clients of Insight North America and Insight UK are small- to
medium-sized businesses (SMB) and large enterprises, as well as government and educational
entities.
Business Overview
Insight is a leading provider of IT products and services with a focus on delivering
strategic business value through technology to businesses, government and educational institutions
in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Over the past couple of years, we have been
evolving our business model and branding efforts to emphasize
Insights ability to provide total product and service solutions based on clients business-driven needs.
Our vision is to be the trusted advisor
1
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
to our clients, helping them enhance their business
performance through innovative technology solutions. Historically, we have primarily been engaged
in our clients acquisition cycle once they have substantially determined their IT needs. As a
trusted advisor, our goal is to move further up in the acquisition cycle, assisting our clients as
they make technology decisions. We believe this will create stronger relationships with our
clients, allowing us to serve our clients more effectively, to expand the amount of products and
services we sell to each of our current clients and to attract new clients. We believe a solution
is defined not by what you sell, but how you sell it. The solution to a business need may be IT
products, services or a combination of both. The key to creating the solution is to understand the
clients business need and assist in determining the right IT solution to address that need.
Although we have initiatives to increase solution selling in our large enterprise client base, we
see an even greater opportunity to sell solutions to SMB clients. IT products are currently sold
to the SMB market by a variety of national product resellers, but we believe that no national
providers of IT products and services are effectively serving this market as a true solutions
provider. We also believe that our expanded business model, knowledgeable sales force, targeted
marketing strategies, streamlined distribution, advanced services capabilities and commitment to
total IT solutions could further differentiate us from our competitors targeting the SMB market.
2005 has been a year of transformation for Insight. We hired, in the fourth quarter of 2004,
a new President and Chief Executive Officer of Insight Enterprises, Inc. who brought a depth of
industry experience to the Company. Under his leadership, many changes have been made to our
business model. The organization structure was flattened, particularly in our United States
operations, and new leaders reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer were hired or
promoted in key positions, including: President of Insights United States operations; President of
Direct Alliance; Chief People Officer; Chief Marketing Officer; and Chief Information Officer.
Several changes were also made in the senior sales and services leadership team in Insights United
States operation. We increased our marketing spend in 2005 approximately 25% over 2004 to help
drive brand recognition and awareness of our capabilities. We have also focused our efforts this
year on enhancing our relationships with our employees (referred to within the Company and this
document as teammates), clients and partners. As an example, we believe we have improved our
teammate relationships by implementing semi-annual teammate satisfaction surveys, improving benefit
offerings, investing in comprehensive training programs, and creating performance management and
bonus plans that are aligned throughout the organization. We are also investing substantial
resources to improve the skills of our sales teams so that they can successfully transition to the
new business model and change their conversations with clients from price and availability to IT
solutions based on the clients business need.
Our financial goals for 2006 are focused on growing net sales faster than the market and
improving our operating margin. To grow net sales faster than the market, we are focused on the
following areas:
|
|
|
increasing the number of active SMB clients;
|
|
|
|
|
leveraging our services capabilities to enhance profitability, especially within our large enterprise clients;
|
|
|
|
|
increasing the share of IT spend within each client;
|
|
|
|
|
enhancing sales training and development;
|
|
|
|
|
aligning sales and marketing strategies;
|
|
|
|
|
leveraging e-commerce capabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
increasing the number of account executives; and
|
|
|
|
|
driving improvements in sales productivity.
|
We believe that in order to meet our operating margin improvement targets, we need to both increase
our gross margin and lower our selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales.
We are focused on the following initiatives that we believe will contribute to improving gross
margin:
|
|
|
increasing attach rates for warranties, integration, leasing, accessories and services;
|
|
|
|
|
improving growth rates in net sales to SMB clients, which are generally conducted at higher gross margins;
|
|
|
|
|
actively managing freight margin tools;
|
|
|
|
|
leveraging automated pricing tools; and
|
|
|
|
|
developing plans to drive growth of higher margin product categories, like software.
|
We are focused on the following initiatives that we believe will help lower selling and
administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
continuing to tighten our management system and focus on expense management
throughout the organization;
|
|
|
|
|
leveraging the new mySAP Business Suite (mySAP) functionality in the second
half of 2006 to automate manual processes and adopt best practices;
|
|
|
|
|
improving sales-to-support ratios;
|
2
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
enhancing our alignment with our key partners to fully leverage our partners
investments in their Insight relationship; and
|
|
|
|
|
reducing our product catalog to feature only high demand products and solutions.
|
As noted above, one of the primary drivers towards reaching both of these goals is increasing our
growth rates in net sales to SMB clients. In the United States in 2005, we experienced above
market growth in net sales to large enterprise clients but below market growth in net sales to our
SMB clients. It is important for us to improve growth rates to the SMB client base not only to
improve overall net sales growth, but to also improve profitability, as sales to SMB clients are
generally conducted at higher gross margins than sales to large enterprise clients and result in
higher levels of funding from our partners. We will also be upgrading our SAP system to mySAP
during the second half of 2006, which we believe will provide us with enhanced IT tools that will
assist us in achieving our financial and operating goals.
Operating Strategy
The key elements of our operating strategy are:
|
|
|
Solutions-oriented business model;
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated sales and marketing;
|
|
|
|
|
Broad selection of branded products; and
|
|
|
|
|
Efficient technology based operations.
|
Solutions-Oriented Business Model.
This model offers business clients the benefits of
complete IT solutions that take advantage of our multiple-vendor product choices, competitive
pricing and availability, fast delivery and a vast array of customized services. We continue to
transition our business model beyond product fulfillment to include capability to advise our
clients on business issues and develop technology solutions to address those issues. We believe
this transition is essential to respond to changes in the way businesses plan for, purchase,
implement and manage technology. In addition to a sophisticated product fulfillment engine, we
offer service capabilities designed to augment our solutions offerings and improve our clients
business processes. We have the ability to serve as the central project manager for many
combinations of IT services a client may require, from basic warranties and financing options, to
custom configuration, large technology deployments, centralized management of mobile technology,
software license planning, network design and implementation, asset tagging and asset disposal. We
believe we deliver strategic business value to our clients by streamlining IT management and costs.
In North America, our largest area of operation, we believe we have a strong competitive advantage
in the degree to which we can provide these products and services across all targeted client
groups. However, currently, the majority of our service offerings are offered and sold to our
large enterprise clients. Our service offerings to SMB clients currently focus primarily on
integration, third party extended warranties and leasing.
Integrated Sales and Marketing.
We market and sell IT products and services solutions through
a variety of integrated direct sales and marketing techniques including:
|
|
|
a staff of client-dedicated account executives utilizing proactive outbound telephone-based sales;
|
|
|
|
|
a client-focused, face-to-face field sales force;
|
|
|
|
|
a nationally deployed dedicated service sales organization;
|
|
|
|
|
a small group of knowledgeable account executives dedicated to taking inbound calls;
|
|
|
|
|
electronic commerce (primarily the Internet and electronic data interchange (EDI));
|
|
|
|
|
targeted marketing (including print and electronic marketing and communications,
advertising and specialty marketing programs);
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive product and services catalogs; and
|
|
|
|
|
pre-sales technical sales support teams.
|
We align our technical sales support resources, and tailor our marketing model, to each client
market. Our marketing programs emphasize our broad product and services offerings, competitive
pricing, fast delivery, client support and financing options. A large portion of our marketing
will continue to be focused on increasing awareness of our service capabilities and the value of
our solutions-oriented business model, as well as increasing Insight brand awareness.
Components of our sales and marketing strategy include:
Focus on Businesses, including Governmental and Educational Entities
. We target
businesses as well as governmental and educational entities. Our target client employs over 100
people who regularly use computing products. We believe this is the most valuable portion of the
IT products and services market because these entities demand high-performance technology
solutions, purchase frequently, are value conscious, appreciate well-trained account executives and
are knowledgeable buyers who require less technical support than the average individual consumer.
Our operating model, which
3
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
allows us to tailor our offerings to the size and complexity of our client, positions us to serve this portion of the market effectively through our competitive
pricing, extensive product availability, advanced service capabilities, well-trained account
executives, high level of client service, cost-effective distribution systems and technological
innovation. During 2005, virtually all of our net sales were to business, governmental and
educational clients, and no single client accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated net sales.
Insight Public Sector (IPS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Insight North America, services
our United States public sector clients, which include federal, state and local governmental
entities, educational institutions and non-profit organizations. Net sales from our public sector
clients are derived from: open market sales to federal, state and local government agencies; sales
made to federal agencies and departments under the Multiple Award Schedule contract between IPS and
the U.S. General Services Administration and blanket purchase agreements between IPS and various
government departments; sales made to various state and local governmental agencies; and sales made
to educational institutions and non-profit organizations. A separate public sector team also
operates within Insight UK and focuses on central and local government entities, educational
institutions, not for profit organizations and the publicly-owned National Health Service. Net
sales from our Insight UK public sector clients are derived from open market sales to individual
entities and to consortium buyers and from contracts. For a discussion of risks associated with
public sector contracts, see Risk Factors The failure to comply with the terms and conditions of
our public sector contracts could result in, among other things, fines or other liabilities, in
Item 1A of this report.
Recruit, Train and Retain a Quality Sales Force
.
The majority of our account
executives focus on outbound telemarketing by contacting existing clients on a systematic basis to
generate additional sales. In addition, these account executives utilize various prospecting
techniques in order to increase the size of our target client base. To support the account
executives, we maintain an extensive database of clients and potential clients. We have
established dedicated outbound sales divisions focusing on SMB (generally less than 2,500 PCs),
larger enterprise businesses (generally at least 2,500 PCs) and the public sector entities.
Account executives in these sales divisions interact with the sophisticated purchasers and IT
systems managers and various other staff of organizations to establish mutually beneficial
relationships within these specific client targets. Once established, the one-on-one relationships
between our clients and their account executives are maintained and enhanced primarily through
frequent communications by telephone supplemented by marketing communications and programs. We
also enhance our telemarketing operations by maintaining a smaller group of face-to-face field
account executives and service sales professionals in a number of cities throughout North America,
and to a lesser extent, in the United Kingdom. These face-to-face field account executives and
service sales professionals typically service larger enterprise accounts, government accounts or
accounts that have advanced system and service needs. However, starting in 2006, we plan to
geographically align clients assigned to our SMB account executives. We believe this will allow us
to utilize our face-to-face field account executives to help strengthen relationships with SMB
clients, as well as partner representatives, in their geographical areas. Additionally, we have a
small group of knowledgeable account executives dedicated to taking inbound calls generated by our
direct marketing activities.
We believe our ability to establish and maintain long-term relationships and to encourage
repeat purchases is dependent, in part, on the quality of our account executives. Because our
clients primary contact with us is through our account executives, we focus on recruiting,
training and retaining qualified and knowledgeable sales staff. During 2005, we expanded our
training programs for new account executives. New account executives now participate in an
extensive twelve-month product, system, sales and procedural training program. The program
progresses from spending the majority of the time in a classroom environment to spending more of
the training time on the sales floor, gaining supervised sales experience. The overall program
focuses on: selling and client service techniques; technical product and services information;
systems training; and policies and procedures. Additionally, in conjunction with product
manufacturers, we sponsor mandatory periodic product and service training sessions that emphasize
the attributes of the products and services and their specific ability to solve clients business needs. We also have periodic training
programs that introduce new policies and procedures. We are further expanding our sales training
programs in 2006 to focus on enhancing existing skills or developing new skills for varying aspects
of the sales process.
With the assistance of our marketing department, each account executive is responsible for
building a client base and proactively servicing the needs of established clients. Our IT systems
allow on-line retrieval of relevant client information, including the clients history and product
information, such as price, cost and availability, as well as up-selling and cross-selling
opportunities. This capability helps deepen client relationships and build our share-of-wallet
with our client base. Additionally, as part of the mySAP upgrade in 2006 for our United States
operations, we are planning to increase our use of customer relationship management (CRM) tools and analytics to target the right solution
or offer to clients with the greatest propensity to have an interest. Account executives are
empowered to negotiate sales prices within established ranges, and a large part of their
compensation is based upon gross profit dollars from sales they generate. As the account executive
gains experience, we give them greater latitude to make decisions, and with greater experience, the
percentage of total compensation based on gross profit dollars generated also increases.
Compensation programs are designed to promote and reward top performers in the organization.
4
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Information regarding the number and tenure of account executives at Insight North
America and Insight UK at December 31, 2005 and 2004 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight North America
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
12/31/04
|
Number of account executives
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
Experience:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
One to two years
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
More than three years
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tenure
|
|
3.9 years
|
|
3.5 years
|
|
2.3 years
|
|
2.2 years
|
Increase in tenure is important to our business as our statistics show that account executive
productivity increases with experience. The increase in average tenure for Insight North America
is due primarily to increased retention efforts, including performance based incentives and
enhanced training programs, and headcount reductions based on performance which largely resulted in
elimination of less experienced account executives. Average tenure for Insight UK has remained
relatively flat over the past year as we have experienced some targeted recruiting of our tenured
account executives by our competition.
For a discussion of risks associated with our dependence on key personnel, including sales
personnel, see Risk Factors We depend on key personnel, in Item 1A of this report.
Focus on Client Service
. We strive to create strong, long-term relationships with our
clients, which we believe promotes client satisfaction and ultimately increases the percentage of
IT spending awarded to us. We believe that a key to building client loyalty is to provide clients
with a knowledgeable account executive backed by a strong support staff that can help clients find
the right IT solutions to solve business needs. Most business clients are assigned a trained
account executive that understands the clients technology needs and proactively identifies and
processes orders for product and service solutions that meet those needs. In addition to our
account executives, we also have technical specialists who support our sales force, creating a team
approach to addressing clients various needs within a total solutions framework. Although
additional support personnel may interact with the client, such as our solutions center or third
party service providers, the clients dedicated account executive remains the primary contact
across all products and services involved. We believe that solving clients unique business and
technology challenges through strong one-to-one sales and project management relationships will
improve the likelihood that clients will look to us for future product and service purchases.
We realize that fast delivery and efficient fulfillment are also important to our clients.
Client orders are sent to one of our distribution centers or to one of our direct ship suppliers
for processing immediately after the order is released. We have integrated labeling and tracking
systems with major freight carriers into our IT system to ensure prompt and traceable delivery.
Additionally, we have integrated our IT system with our direct ship suppliers making shipments
from these suppliers virtually transparent to our clients. We ship almost all of our orders on the
day the orders are released for shipment.
We believe that effective client service is an important factor in client retention and
overall satisfaction. We are planning additional automation of our business processes with the
upgrade to mySAP and believe these improvements will increase client satisfaction and retention.
Promote Use of E-Commerce
. We believe that providing the client with a seamless
e-commerce system, supported by well-trained account executives results in a highly efficient
business model that delivers high client satisfaction. Account executives encourage clients to
place online orders via our website, www.insight.com, and we offer selected businesses their own
customized landing pages, which are designed by our electronic marketing team. These pages allow
businesses to customize views based on their needs and procurement guidelines and to purchase IT
products and services from us at pre-negotiated, volume-based pricing. We also create awareness of
our products and services to clients and prospects through graphically rich electronic newsletters,
electronic postcards and other branded sales messages transmitted via e-mail. Through the
promotion of e-commerce, including EDI and our website, we hope to increase sales, facilitate our
clients ease of doing business with us and decrease administrative costs.
5
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Selectively Employ Specialty Marketing, Catalogs and Advertising
. We continue to
increase our national exposure, promote local interest and encourage visits to our website through
title sponsorship of the Insight Bowl, a post-season intercollegiate football game. During the
2005 Insight Bowl, telecast live by ESPN on December 27, 2005, we aired television commercials
highlighting our in-house solutions capabilities as well as commercials showcasing manufacturers
products offered by us. These 30-second spots provided cooperative advertising opportunities for
our suppliers and us and encouraged high-technology business buyers in the United States to call us
or visit our website. We also leverage more traditional merchandising catalogs and selectively
place targeted advertisements in trade publications in the United States, Canada and the United
Kingdom. These catalogs and advertisements emphasize our solution offerings and may also provide
detailed product descriptions, manufacturers specifications and pricing information.
Additionally, the Insight logo and telephone number are included from time to time in promotions by
selected manufacturers.
In the United Kingdom, we are continuing to provide a comprehensive product and services
catalog to select clients. Each catalog provides detailed product descriptions, manufacturers
specifications, pricing and service and support features. In 2005, we expanded our catalog
distribution in the United Kingdom to include catalogs aimed at specific vertical markets or
industries, such as healthcare, legal and financial services. These vertically focused catalogs
augment our sales force in the United Kingdom which is also starting to focus, at least a portion
of their assigned clients, on specific vertical markets. We also send targeted catalogs and direct
mail brochures showcasing our product, service and solution offerings to clients in the United
States, Canada and the United Kingdom.
Broad Selection of Branded Products.
We provide added convenience by offering our clients a
comprehensive selection of over 195,000 brand name IT products in North America, and more than
65,000 products in the United Kingdom. We offer products from hundreds of manufacturers including
Hewlett-Packard (HP), Lenovo, Cisco, Microsoft, IBM, Toshiba, Lexmark, American Power Conversion,
Sony, and Symantec. Our breadth of product offerings combined with our efficient, high-volume and
cost-effective direct sales and marketing allows us to offer competitive prices. We believe that
offering multiple vendor choices enables us to better serve clients needs by providing a variety
of product solutions to best address their specific business needs, based on particular client
preferences or other criteria, such as real-time best pricing and availability, or compatibility
with existing technology. During the year, we worked to reduce our product SKU count, which allows
us to reduce costs associated with maintaining a larger number of SKUs and we will continue to
evaluate the number and types of SKUs that we offer. We have developed direct-ship programs
with many of our suppliers through the use of EDI and extensible markup language (XML) links
allowing us to expand our product offerings without further increasing inventory, handling costs or
inventory risk exposure. Convenience and product options among multiple brands are key competitive
advantages against manufacturers direct selling programs, which are generally limited to their own
brands and may not be able to offer clients a complete or best solution across all product
categories.
We select our products based upon existing and proven technology and anticipated client needs.
Our product managers and buyers evaluate the effectiveness of new and existing products and select
those products for inclusion in our offerings based upon the fit in strategic solutions, market
demand, product features, quality, reliability, sales trends, price, margins and warranties. We
also add products to our selection based on direct client requests, when appropriate.
The manufacturer warrants most of the products we market, and it is our policy to request that
clients return their defective products directly to the manufacturer for warranty service. On
selected products, and for selected client service reasons, we may accept returns directly from the
client and then either credit the client or ship a replacement product. We generally offer a
limited 15- to 30-day return policy for unopened products and certain opened products, which is
consistent with manufacturers terms; however, for some products we may charge restocking fees.
Products returned opened are quickly processed and returned to the manufacturer or supplier for
repair, replacement or credit to us. We resell most unopened products returned to us. Products
that cannot be returned to the manufacturer for warranty processing, but are in working condition,
are promptly sold to inventory liquidators, end users as previously sold or used products or
are sold through other channels, to limit our losses from returned products.
During 2005, we purchased products from approximately 1,260 suppliers. Approximately 43%
(based on dollar volume) of these purchases were directly from manufacturers, with the balance from
distributors. Through our distribution subsidiary, PC Wholesale, we have also purchased from and
sold to other computer resellers in order to offer our clients favorable pricing, to balance our
inventory or to minimize inventory risk. Purchases from HP, a manufacturer, Ingram Micro, Inc.
(Ingram) and Tech Data Corporation (Tech Data), both of which are distributors, accounted for
approximately 17%, 17% and 14%, respectively, of Insights aggregate purchases in 2005. No other
supplier accounted for more than 10% of purchases in 2005. Our top five suppliers as a group for
2005 were: HP; Ingram; Tech Data; Synnex Information Technologies, a distributor; and Lenovo, a
manufacturer. We purchased approximately 59% of Insights total product purchases during 2005 from
this group of suppliers. Although brand names and individual products are important to our
business, we believe that competitive sources of supply are available in substantially all of
our product categories and that we are not dependent on any single supplier for sourcing product.
We obtain supplier reimbursements from certain product manufacturers based typically upon the
volume of sales or purchases of the suppliers products. In other cases, such reimbursements may
be in the form of participation in our partner
6
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
programs, discounts, advertising allowances, price
protection or rebates. Manufacturers may also provide mailing lists, contacts or leads to us. We
believe that supplier reimbursements allow us to increase our marketing reach and strengthen our
relationships with leading suppliers. These reimbursements are important to us, and any
elimination or substantial reduction would increase our costs of goods sold or marketing expenses
and decrease our earnings from operations and net earnings. During 2005, sales of products
manufactured by HP accounted for approximately 30% of Insights net sales. No other manufacturer
accounted for more than 10% of Insights net sales in 2005. Sales of product from our top five
manufacturers as a group (HP, Cisco, IBM, Microsoft and Lenovo) accounted for approximately 59% of
Insights net sales during 2005. We believe that the majority of IT purchases by our clients are
made based on the ability of our total product and service offering to meet their IT needs more
than on specific brands.
For a discussion of risks associated with our reliance on suppliers, see Risk Factors We
rely on our suppliers for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing incentives and
competitive products to sell, in Item 1A of this report.
Advanced IT Services Offering.
Although sales of services are currently a small percentage of
our net sales (less than 5%) and gross profit, we believe our service offerings differentiate us
from our competitors. We believe these service offerings help to establish strong, deep-rooted
relationships with clients as they look to us for more than just product fulfillment and view us as
partners in creating integrated product and service solutions for their IT needs. As sales of
services increase, services will likely become a greater percentage of gross profit because sales
of services are generally at a higher gross margin than product sales. Currently, many of these
service capabilities are more widely available to clients in the United States than in Canada or
the United Kingdom and are currently sold primarily to large enterprise clients. We provide our
clients a wide variety of IT services that focus on the following areas:
|
|
|
Custom Configuration We custom configure servers, desktops, laptops and
peripherals, including services such as:
|
|
o
|
|
asset tagging;
|
|
|
o
|
|
basic testing;
|
|
|
o
|
|
hardware and software configuration; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
software imaging and installation.
|
|
|
|
Advanced Integration Our ISO 9001: 2000 certified advanced integration lab in the
United States provides technical operations, resources and expertise to manage and
implement large-scale network rollouts, including:
|
|
o
|
|
workstations, servers and connectivity equipment;
|
|
|
o
|
|
individual user customization of file servers, switches, routers and racks;
|
|
|
o
|
|
pre-built networks, including IP addressing;
|
|
|
o
|
|
live network testing and turnkey deployment; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
wireless activations and configurations.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Consulting We evaluate, design, implement and manage business
technology projects for our clients. Our enterprise consulting competencies include:
|
|
o
|
|
infrastructure assessment and design;
|
|
|
o
|
|
wireless LAN design and implementation;
|
|
|
o
|
|
Citrix deployments;
|
|
|
o
|
|
Microsoft implementation;
|
|
|
o
|
|
IP voice and telephony solutions; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
network security.
|
|
|
|
National Repair Center Our ISO 9001:2005 certified national repair center is
dedicated to maintaining our clients equipment and ensuring optimal performance levels
through a variety of services including:
|
|
o
|
|
break fix services;
|
|
|
o
|
|
hot swap/spare program;
|
|
|
o
|
|
asset retrieval, refurbishment or redeployment; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
end-of-lease processing.
|
|
|
|
Resource Management We offer highly skilled technical staff to augment clients
existing IT staffs in areas such as:
|
|
o
|
|
desk side support;
|
|
|
o
|
|
help desk support;
|
|
|
o
|
|
installs, moves, adds and changes;
|
|
|
o
|
|
LAN administration; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
critical server restoration.
|
7
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Project Management We provide clients with experienced project managers who
coordinate the planning, design, deployment, and support of their IT projects and
ongoing service programs. This service is performed via our Project Management Office
which provides standard methodology and quality assurance.
|
|
|
|
National Implementation Programs Together with selected highly qualified service
partners, we provide comprehensive, customized implementation services, including:
|
|
o
|
|
national implementation and deployment projects;
|
|
|
o
|
|
national service maintenance programs;
|
|
|
o
|
|
wireless LAN implementations; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
service vendor relationship management.
|
A significant amount of services provided by Insight North America are delivered through
extensive in-house capabilities, including services performed in our ISO 9001:2000 certified
advanced integration and custom configuration labs and our ISO 9001:2005 national repair center.
On certain service offerings or in certain geographies, Insight North America manages delivery of
services by contracting with highly qualified service partners. We believe this combination is a
key differentiator from direct competitors in the United States. Insight UK manages delivery of
services by contracting with highly qualified service partners. Regardless of delivery methods or
geography, the clients dedicated account executive remains the primary contact throughout the
entire sales and service implementation process and we offer to maintain the service level
agreement to assure consistent quality of service across the project. This commitment to project
management is central to our value proposition for delivering total product and service solutions,
and we believe it will enhance the development of strong, long-term relationships with clients.
Our account executives are supported by teams of qualified experts that specialize in specific
emerging and/or complex technologies. In North America, we currently have technical sales support
teams focused on the following product and service categories:
|
|
|
Connectivity;
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Systems;
|
|
|
|
|
Networking;
|
|
|
|
|
Training;
|
|
|
|
|
Third Party Extended Warranties;
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless;
|
|
|
|
|
Project Management;
|
|
|
|
|
Lifecycle Management; and
|
|
|
|
|
Security.
|
In the United Kingdom, we currently have teams of qualified experts focused on:
|
|
|
Connectivity;
|
|
|
|
|
Servers;
|
|
|
|
|
Networking;
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless;
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties; and
|
|
|
|
|
Software Licensing/Planning.
|
Historically in the industry, advanced services were available nationally to larger enterprise
clients. However, we have the ability to provide certain of those services nationally to our SMB
clients and view this as an opportunity for growth. Determining which services are best suited to
the SMB clients, creating awareness of our capabilities and increasing sales to
this client group will be a significant focus in the future. However, for 2006, our service
offerings to SMB clients will continue to focus primarily on integration, third party extended
warranties and leasing.
We believe that there is no other national reseller able to offer the same breadth and depth
of IT products and services that we offer across all target client groups in the United States.
Efficient Technology Based Operations.
In 2003 and early 2004, a significant amount of time
and resources were focused on the migration of our operations serving United States clients to a
new, unified IT platform. This system, referred to internally as Maximus, is a hybrid system,
combining SAP R/3 version 4.6 (SAP) for back-end support functions with a proprietary, customized
front-end consisting of a set of enhanced capabilities developed to make it easier for clients to
conduct business with Insight and to increase the productivity of our account executives, and a
customized back-end for sourcing product to improve purchasing decisions and inventory management.
8
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
We have seen many benefits from the Maximus system, including: an integrated sales and support
engine; an efficient, reliable and consistent system to support our business needs; more robust
reporting and analysis capabilities; and an increase in functionality from a sales perspective. In
2006, we are planning to upgrade SAP to mySAP. We believe some of the benefits provided by mySAP
will be as follows:
|
|
|
increased sales executive and client support productivity;
|
|
|
|
|
automated service tracking and billing;
|
|
|
|
|
enhanced CRM capabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
improved service contract management and reporting;
|
|
|
|
|
further automation of manual and inefficient processes;
|
|
|
|
|
reduced custom programming and maintenance; and
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of best practices around business processes.
|
We believe our implementation of advanced technological systems provides a competitive
advantage by increasing the productivity of our account executives, delivering more efficient
client service and reducing order processing and inventory costs. We currently plan to deploy our
IT system in the United States, including the upgrade to mySAP, to our United Kingdom and Canadian
operations in the next few years.
Although Maximus has enhanced functionality, our IT systems in all geographies allow our
account executives to obtain a wide range of information, including:
|
|
|
client information;
|
|
|
|
|
product information;
|
|
|
|
|
product pricing, gross profit and availability;
|
|
|
|
|
product compatibility and alternative product offerings and accessories; and
|
|
|
|
|
order status.
|
We believe that the information available to our account executives allows them to make better
decisions regarding product and services recommendations and pricing, provide superior client
service and increase overall profitability. We also believe that our investment in IT will
continue to improve the efficiency of our operations.
The majority of our United States distribution operations are conducted within a 440,000
square foot distribution facility in Hanover Park, Illinois. Activities performed in our Illinois
distribution center include receipt and shipping of inventory and returned product processing.
Additionally, this distribution center houses our national repair center and our advanced
integration and custom configuration labs. We also have a small distribution facility in Canada
and a 53,000 square foot distribution facility in the United Kingdom. All of our IT systems have
capabilities that integrate our sales, distribution, inventory and accounting functions. Through
our IT systems, we send orders electronically to one of our distribution centers or to a direct
ship supplier for processing immediately upon order release, and the distribution center or
supplier automatically prints a packing slip for order fulfillment. Products received in our
distribution centers are assigned a unique bar code and placed in designated bin locations. We use
systematic checks to ensure accurate fulfillment and to provide real-time reduction in inventories.
We have implemented a re-ordering system that calculates lead times and, in some instances,
automatically orders from certain suppliers. Our system accepts price quotes from several
competing suppliers and, in most cases, automatically re-orders from the supplier with the most
competitive price and availability. We have integrated our order processing, labeling and tracking
systems with major freight carriers to ensure prompt and traceable delivery. We utilize a combined
physical and virtual distribution model, utilizing just-in-time inventory management and direct
ship
relationships with suppliers to reduce inventory costs and increase client satisfaction. We
also purchase and hold inventory for our integration labs and upcoming projects with large
enterprise and public sector clients. We promote the use of EDI or XML links with our suppliers,
which we believe helps to reduce overhead, simplify the order fulfillment cycle and reduce the use
of paper in the ordering process. Our physical distribution capabilities allow us to inventory
product as needed to take advantage of product allocations, make opportunistic purchases or meet
the service requirements of our clients. Our inventory management techniques, utilizing our system
capabilities, allow us to offer a greater range of products without increased inventory
requirements, and to reduce inventory exposure and shorten order fulfillment time.
Additionally, our voice and data networks are an important part of our technology-based
operations as the majority of our sales, marketing and client service efforts are conducted either
via the telephone or over the web. Our telephone system is programmed to route inbound calls
automatically, depending on their originating data, to specific sales groups, or to specific
account executives. Our telephone system also uses menu functions that permit the clients to route
themselves to the appropriate sales, service or support area or to their assigned account
executives. Our technology infrastructure, generally, and our data connectivity, particularly, are
important links in our efforts to increase the ease of transacting business with us.
9
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For a discussion of risks associated with our information technology and voice and data
networks, see Risk Factors Disruptions in our information technology and voice and data networks
could affect our ability to service our clients and cause us to incur additional expenses, in Item
1A of this report.
Growth Strategy
Insights growth strategy is to increase sales and earnings by:
|
|
|
Selling additional products and services to our existing client base;
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding our client base;
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalizing on our international presence;
|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging our existing infrastructure; and
|
|
|
|
|
Making opportunistic strategic acquisitions.
|
Selling Additional Products and Services to Our Existing Client Base.
We seek to become the
primary provider of IT solutions for our clients by investing in the development and training of
our account executives and providing the tools to sell the best IT solution, including products and
services, to our clients in an efficient manner. We believe proactive account management and
assignment of specific account executives dedicated to developing closer relationships with active
business clients will enable us to increase the volume, frequency, and breadth and depth of sales
to these clients. We continue to refine and analyze our client database to better understand and
service our clients, which we believe will result in establishing and maintaining deeper long-term
client relationships and enhanced client loyalty. In addition, we are focused on improving account
executive productivity by providing a comprehensive, on-going training program, implementing
incentive programs that focus on rewarding and retaining top performers and automating routine
processes. We are training account executives on our solutions capabilities and on a sales process
that anticipates and evaluates our clients business needs, both current and future, so that we can
capitalize on opportunities to be our clients primary and trusted advisor regarding IT solutions
that address those needs.
We increased our marketing initiatives in 2005 relating to demand generation, promotion of our
solutions capabilities and general brand awareness. We believe, particularly in the United States,
that the full breadth of our solution-focused product and service offerings is an important
differentiating factor from our competitors. We also believe that our value proposition of our
solution-focused business model is not being fully utilized by our sales executives serving SMB
clients, government, educational and non-profit organizations, or by these target clients.
In 2005, we rolled out an integrated marketing approach among sales, marketing and product
management. We went to market with the following five specific solution focuses and started
aligning our sales, marketing, technical and service areas to support these focus areas:
|
|
|
Manage IT
SM
solutions focused on managing a businesss IT
infrastructure (e.g., technology refresh and server consolidation);
|
|
|
|
|
Mobilize IT
SM
solutions focused on product and services that assist
businesses in their efforts to enhance the mobility of their workforces (e.g., wireless
devices, Wi-Fi infrastructure, wireless WANs and data/voice convergence);
|
|
|
|
|
Store IT
SM
solutions focused on the storage needs of business clients
(e.g., disaster recovery, storage management and regulatory compliance);
|
|
|
|
|
Print IT
SM
solutions focused on lowering print costs for businesses
(e.g., print assessment, document management and pay per use); and
|
|
|
|
|
Secure IT
SM
solutions focused on securing businesses communications,
websites and workforces (e.g., e-mail security, firewalls and antivirus systems).
|
These are managed solutions that our solution experts design based on their detailed assessment of
the clients business requirements. We will own the solution, from design and configuration to
deployment and life cycle management. We believe our long-term relationships with the worlds
leading IT vendors combined with our technical expertise can help us provide effective solutions
that bring our clients greater return on investment and reduced total cost of ownership.
Specific solutions have been and will continue to be brought to market under each of these
focus areas and will be supported by:
|
|
|
sales training and education;
|
|
|
|
|
selling tools;
|
|
|
|
|
awareness building;
|
10
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
client events;
|
|
|
|
|
demand generation;
|
|
|
|
|
product management;
|
|
|
|
|
purchasing;
|
|
|
|
|
services development;
|
|
|
|
|
web merchandising; and
|
|
|
|
|
sales incentives.
|
We are also developing a Solutions Center in the United States, primarily to support our SMB
account executives. The Solutions Center is aligned with each new solution and allows our SMB
account executives to have a single point of contact when engaging assistance from our technical
support teams with complex IT solutions involving products, services or a combination of the two.
The Solutions Center complements the technical sales support teams that typically assist our
account executives and service sales professionals in developing solutions for our large corporate
clients.
We believe this integrated, targeted approach will allow us to communicate our value
proposition to our clients, suppliers and account executives more effectively.
Expanding Our Client Base.
We intend to increase our direct sales and targeted marketing
efforts in each of our client segments: SMB; large enterprises; and government, educational and
non-profit organizations. We seek to acquire new account relationships through proactive outbound
telesales, face-to-face field sales, electronic commerce, targeted direct marketing and increased
advertising focused on Insight brand awareness and the differentiating factors of our business
model.
Capitalizing on Our International Presence.
We seek to capitalize on our international
presence in an effort to achieve our long-term goal of becoming a global leader for IT products and
services solutions. To that end, we have established operations in Canada and the United Kingdom.
Our presence in these countries provides us with an increased client base, expanded product
offerings and the ability to leverage our existing infrastructure and supplier relationships. We
eventually intend to continue expanding in existing geographies, and we may expand into Europe or
other international locations. For a discussion of risks associated with international operations,
see Risk Factors There are risks associated with international operations that are different
than those inherent in the United States business, in Item 1A of this report.
Leveraging Our Existing Infrastructure.
We have expended considerable resources to develop
our infrastructure to support planned growth. In early 2004, we completed the conversion of IT
systems supporting our United States clients to Maximus and expect to complete the upgrade of the
SAP portions of Maximus to mySAP during 2006. We currently plan to deploy Maximus in our United
Kingdom and Canadian operations in the next few years. We believe the mySAP upgrade will better
enable us to meet or exceed our clients expectations and further differentiate us from our
competitors. The benefits we have already seen from the Maximus system are: an integrated sales
and support engine; an efficient, reliable and consistent system to support our business needs;
more robust reporting and analysis capabilities; and an increase in functionality from a sales
perspective. We believe there are opportunities to gain additional efficiencies and electronically
enable routine transactions by adding functionality to the system through mySAP, reducing custom
programming and adopting best practices around business processes. Our goal is to enhance our
system capabilities and business processes to a
level which would enable us to potentially process any client, supplier and teammate
interaction electronically.
We have also invested in facilities and strengthened our senior management teams in each of
our operating segments over the past few years. We believe our infrastructure allows us to grow
for the next few years without additional significant investments in facilities and senior
management. We will continue to invest in enhancing our IT systems, increasing the number of
account executives (depending on market demand), training, marketing and brand building, and
product and service expertise in our solution focus areas. We believe that our investments will
allow us to increase sales at a faster rate than operating expenses. For a discussion of risks
associated with our IT and telephone systems, see Risk Factors Disruptions in our information
technology and voice and data networks could affect our ability to service our clients and cause us
to incur additional expenses, in Item 1A of this report.
Making Opportunistic Strategic Acquisitions.
Based on our acquisition experience, capital
structure and IT system platform, we believe we are well positioned to take advantage of strategic
acquisitions that broaden our client base, expand our geographic reach, scale our existing
operating structure and/or enhance our product and service offerings. It is part of our growth
strategy to evaluate and consider strategic acquisition opportunities if and when they become
available.
11
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For a discussion of risks associated with future acquisitions, see Risk Factors The
integration and operation of future acquired businesses may disrupt our business, create additional
expenses and utilize cash or debt availability, in Item 1A of this report.
Industry
Prior to late 2000, the industry experienced strong growth rates amidst a healthy
economic environment. Sales of IT products in the following years decreased worldwide due to
sluggish economic growth and a lengthening of IT replacement cycles. This slowdown in spending was
evident beginning in the fourth quarter of 2000 and signs of an anticipated recovery were only
first seen through slightly increased activity in the latter half of 2003, which continued in 2004
and 2005. We remain optimistic that IT spending will continue to increase in 2006, although we
believe the motivation and demand for purchases has changed from that of the pre-2000 era, and we
have repositioned ourselves to respond to these changes accordingly so that we may increase our
market share. Technology purchases are being made to address business-driven needs, and financial
officers are increasingly playing greater roles in the final purchasing decisions. We believe that
demand is no longer driven, for example, only by increased speed and functionality of basic desktop
computers, but by the total cost of ownership and return on investment of IT expenditures.
Therefore, direct marketers are increasing efforts to include IT services among their offerings,
and outbound telesales organizations are being complemented by face-to-face field sales. Insight
North America has been at the forefront of this trend since acquiring extensive advanced service
capabilities in early 2002, and other direct marketers have since made efforts to include varying
levels of services among their offerings. We believe that we are uniquely positioned to take
advantage of this shift in client purchasing, as we began migrating from pure product
fulfillment-driven direct marketing strategies to our solutions-oriented model of providing IT
products and services much earlier than other direct marketers. We believe that in addition to the
changing motivation for purchases, the industry is evolving in other ways, too. The market for IT
products and services is served through a variety of distribution channels, and intense competition
for market share has forced manufacturers to reexamine the psychology behind clients purchasing
behaviors and to seek the most cost effective and efficient channels to distribute their products.
Clients are changing the way they plan for, purchase and implement technology purchases, and
participants in the supply chain, including us, are changing in an effort to keep pace with or get
ahead of these changes. We believe the following trends have emerged:
|
|
|
Manufacturers are continuing their use of the direct channel, through direct
marketers like us and through their own internal resources, to market and sell products
directly to clients in order to grow sales and lower overall selling costs.
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation has occurred over the past few years among direct marketers, and as
larger direct marketers continue to broaden their client reach and increase the depth
and breadth of product and service offerings, we believe that larger direct marketers
will continue to take market share away from smaller resellers.
|
Additionally, with increased competition and an overall improved industry-wide supply chain,
IT products experience continual declines in average selling prices. Therefore, in order to
increase net sales, unit sales must grow at a rate faster than the decline in average selling
prices.
We believe that we will continue to benefit from industry changes as a cost-effective provider
of a full range of IT products and services. While purchasing decisions will continue to be
influenced by product selection and availability, price and convenience, we believe that solution
offerings, knowledge of account executives and client service will become the differentiators
businesses will look for when procuring total solutions that minimize their total cost of
ownership. For a discussion of risks associated with uncertain economic conditions and actions of
competitors, see Risk Factors Changes in the information technology and/or economic environment
may reduce demand for the products and services we sell, and The IT products and services
industry is intensely competitive and actions of competitors, including manufacturers of products
we sell, can negatively affect our business, in Item 1A of this report.
Competition
The IT products and services industry is highly competitive. We compete with a large
number and wide variety of marketers and resellers of IT products and services, including:
|
|
|
product manufacturers, such as Dell, HP and IBM;
|
|
|
|
|
other direct marketers, such as CDW Corporation (North America), PC World Business (United Kingdom);
|
|
|
|
|
national and regional resellers, including value-added resellers and specialty
retailers, aggregators, distributors, national computer retailers, computer
superstores, Internet-only computer providers, consumer electronics and office supply
superstores and mass merchandisers; and
|
|
|
|
|
national and global service providers, such as IBM Global Services, HP and EDS.
|
Product manufacturers continue to sell directly to business clients, particularly larger
enterprise clients. Manufacturers, however, typically do not offer the breadth of multi-branded
product offerings that direct marketers such as us offer, nor do
12
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
they have sufficient scale to
penetrate the SMB space cost effectively. Additionally, most manufacturers, as well as other
direct marketers, do not provide the advanced level of services that we offer our clients. We
believe that we offer enhanced solution capability, broader product selection and availability,
competitive prices, and greater purchasing convenience than traditional retail stores or
value-added resellers, and that our dedicated account executives offer the necessary support
functions (e.g., purchases on credit terms and efficient return processes) which Internet-only
sellers do not usually provide. We are not aware of any competitors with both the breadth and
depth of solution offerings we have in the United States. This allows us to differentiate
ourselves with a client service strategy that spans the continuum from fast delivery of
competitively priced products to advanced IT solutions, and a selling approach that permits us to
grow with clients and solidify those relationships.
Although the barriers to entry into the industry for an Internet-only reseller are relatively
low, we believe that new entrants into the direct marketing channel must overcome a number of
significant barriers to entry including:
|
|
|
the time and resources required to build a client base of sufficient size and a
well-trained account executive sales base;
|
|
|
|
|
the significant investment required to develop an IT and operating infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
|
the advantages enjoyed by established larger competitors with purchasing and operating efficiencies;
|
|
|
|
|
the reluctance of manufacturers and distributors to allocate product and supplier
reimbursements and establish electronic transactional relationships with additional
participants; and
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of identifying and recruiting qualified management personnel and a
sufficient number of account executives to sell technically advanced products.
|
Some of our competitors have longer operating histories and greater financial, technical,
marketing and other resources than us. In addition, some of these competitors may be able to
respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities, technologies and client requirements. Many
current and potential competitors also have greater name recognition and engage in more extensive
promotional marketing and advertising activities, offer more attractive terms to clients and adopt
more aggressive pricing policies than we do.
For a discussion of risks associated with the actions of our competitors, see Risk Factors
The IT products and services industry is intensely competitive and actions of competitors,
including manufacturers of products we sell, can negatively affect our business, in Item 1A of
this report.
Direct Alliance
Direct Alliance is our business process outsourcing (BPO) organization, representing 2%
and 11% of consolidated net sales and earnings from operations, respectively, in 2005.
Business Overview
In 1993, we sought to leverage core competencies in direct marketing by providing
outsourced direct marketing services to third parties through the creation of Direct Alliance. The
range of outsourced services has expanded over the years beyond direct marketing to also include
solutions designed to enhance manufacturers relationships with their channel partners, such as
direct marketers. We currently offer solutions designed to rapidly enable and drive cost-efficient
sales through proprietary systems, processes, personnel and expertise that are tailored to each
client. Because business process outsourcing is not core to our operations, we will, from time to
time, evaluate opportunities to divest Direct Alliance with the ultimate goal of maximizing
stockholder value.
Operating Strategy
Our BPO services are focused on customized solutions in the following key areas:
|
|
|
Customer Behavior Analytics
- statistical modeling and analysis using data generated
from a variety of sources, within a structured client lifecycle methodology, including:
|
|
o
|
|
customer performance metrics;
|
|
|
o
|
|
sales reporting analytics;
|
|
|
o
|
|
campaign management;
|
|
|
o
|
|
web analytics; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
product analysis.
|
|
|
|
Direct Marketing
- traditional direct mail and electronic direct marketing services, including:
|
13
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
o
|
|
catalog marketing;
|
|
|
o
|
|
extranet marketing; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
marketing consulting.
|
|
|
|
Direct and Indirect Sales Channels
- service and technologies that can
simultaneously connect clients with multiple sales channels, including:
|
|
o
|
|
outbound telesales;
|
|
|
o
|
|
field sales enablement;
|
|
|
o
|
|
inbound telesales;
|
|
|
o
|
|
customer service;
|
|
|
o
|
|
partner relationship development;
|
|
|
o
|
|
opportunity management; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
web/e-commerce sales.
|
|
|
|
Financial Services
- accurate financial information and secure transaction management services, including:
|
|
o
|
|
trade credit management;
|
|
|
o
|
|
credit card processing;
|
|
|
o
|
|
leasing solutions;
|
|
|
o
|
|
fraud detection and prevention;
|
|
|
o
|
|
invoice payment management;
|
|
|
o
|
|
sales tax collection and management;
|
|
|
o
|
|
accounts receivable;
|
|
|
o
|
|
accounts payable;
|
|
|
o
|
|
vendor returns processing; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
- information and support services to improve
logistics and supply chain management, including:
|
|
o
|
|
order management;
|
|
|
o
|
|
fulfillment;
|
|
|
o
|
|
virtual supply chain management; and
|
|
|
o
|
|
reverse logistics management.
|
We offer a unique selection of BPO services, including proprietary technology, processes and
management expertise for direct and indirect sales channels. We can operate as a virtual
division for our clients or as a dedicated reseller. These customized services enable our
clients to sell directly to customers and/or support existing indirect sales channels in a
cost-effective and timely manner. Direct Alliances proprietary IT systems, which are used by many
of our clients in support of the sales programs we operate for them, can be successfully integrated
with many of todays most common applications, such as SAP, Oracle and Siebel. Additionally, in
some cases, we license our multi-lingual, multi-currency proprietary systems to assist our clients
in deploying telesales operations in foreign countries.
We believe that our combination of services, proprietary technology, proven processes and
management expertise allows us to provide our clients with:
|
|
|
profitable sales growth;
|
|
|
|
|
cost-effectiveness;
|
|
|
|
|
fast deployment of direct and channel-focused solutions;
|
|
|
|
|
improved client satisfaction; and
|
|
|
|
|
system capabilities for international and domestic operations.
|
Any combination of our service offerings can be employed to provide customized, vertically
integrated programs for clients. BPO programs can vary in duration, type and quantity and can run
in succession or concurrently, depending on each clients needs. Some programs may be
seasonal in nature, particularly if our clients customers have cyclical buying patterns.
14
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Presently, the majority of our outsourcing arrangements are service fee based, meaning that we
derive net sales based primarily upon a cost plus arrangement in addition to a percentage of the
sales price from products sold. Revenues from service fee based programs and direct costs related
to the generation of those revenues are included in our net sales and cost of goods sold,
respectively. As an accommodation to select service fee based program clients, we may also
purchase and immediately resell products to our clients for ultimate sale to their customers.
These pass-through product sales are completed at little or no gross margin and are included in net
sales and cost of goods sold. Under certain outsourcing arrangements, we may take title to
inventories of products and assume credit risk associated with sales to the end user. Revenues and
the related costs from the sales of such products are included in our net sales and cost of goods
sold, respectively. The mix of outsourcing arrangements that are in place from time to time will
affect the rate of our future growth in net sales and earnings from operations.
We currently provide BPO services to a limited number of major brand-name manufacturers,
primarily in the IT and consumer electronics industries. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, one outsourcing client accounted for approximately 28% and 60%, respectively, of Direct
Alliances net sales and our three largest outsourcing clients accounted for approximately 76% and
88%, respectively, of net sales. The declines from prior year in concentration with Direct
Alliances largest clients reflects the fact that the historical contract with Direct Alliances
largest client, IBM, was replaced in May 2005 with separate contracts with IBM and Lenovo which
expire at the end of 2006. For a discussion of risks associated with reliance on outsourcing
clients, see Risk Factors We rely on a limited number of outsourcing clients, in Item 1A of
this report.
Growth Strategy
Our goal is to be a leading provider of BPO services by:
Enhancing Existing Client Relationships and Increasing Industry Penetration.
We currently
provide BPO services to a limited number of large manufacturers, primarily in the computing systems
and consumer electronics industries, and seek to become the system of record for all direct channel
sales with each of our existing clients by:
|
|
|
expanding the breadth of services offered under current programs;
|
|
|
|
|
becoming the most effective sales team in our clients organization, further
supporting the benefit of outsourcing sales processes to us;
|
|
|
|
|
increasing business development efforts to obtain additional clients within the
industry; and
|
|
|
|
|
promoting our outsourced services, including our multi-lingual, multi-currency
system capabilities, to other divisions and product lines within our clients
organizations.
|
Conducting Channel-centric Business within the IT and Consumer Electronic Industries.
While
we continue to see opportunity in providing direct program solutions, we are experiencing an
increase in demand for channel programs designed to enhance manufacturers relationships with their
channel partners, such as direct marketers. Opportunities exist to provide lead and demand
generation activities, channel partner support and more cost efficient supply chain solutions to
manufacturers. We are responding to these opportunities by:
|
|
|
providing our clients with channel partner support through BPO programs that will
generate incremental channel opportunities, motivating and supporting existing channel
partners to sell our clients product lines, and providing a system that measures the
programs return on investment to our client;
|
|
|
|
|
utilizing our demand generation capabilities and data analytics to produce a more
cost effective channel solution;
|
|
|
|
|
offering physical distribution and virtual supply chain solutions to deliver a more
cost effective and responsive supply model for our clients;
|
|
|
|
|
utilizing our sales organization to identify business opportunities and drive sales
through our clients channel partners; and
|
|
|
|
|
providing both service and dedicated reseller programs for our clients based on
their specific needs.
|
Expanding into the Industries of Software, Customer Loyalty and Office Automation.
While we
continue to see opportunities within the IT and consumer electronics industries, we are
experiencing an increasing demand for both direct programs and channel programs related to
software, warranties, service contracts and office automation. Although competitors already exist
in each of these markets, we believe we can successfully differentiate our offerings with unique
capabilities in relationship-based sales, business process management and transaction management
services.
We believe we can successfully compete for software clients by focusing on software products
that have three- to six-month sales cycles and are sold to SMB clients with complex sales
environments where relationship development is a competitive differentiator.
15
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
We also have developed a dedicated customer loyalty team that sells warranty and service
contracts. We believe that our approach to selling warranties and service contracts is unique and
represents an attractive solution for many manufacturers of hard goods products. We currently sell
such contracts to users of IT products and intend to expand our offerings to consumer electronics
manufacturers and other related industries.
The office automation industry offers an attractive growth opportunity to sell consumable
items such as printer cartridges, toner, ink and paper supplies. Where automation and
auto-replenishment play an important part in reducing the cost of ownership within an organization,
we believe our related strengths in business process management, transaction services and systems
integration allow us to offer an attractive solution to manufacturers of printers, copiers and
digital imaging products.
Marketing Activities.
Based on our strong performance history with our current clients, we
believe there will continue to be growth opportunities within our current client programs as well
as opportunities to obtain new clients in the IT, consumer electronics, software, customer loyalty
and office automation industries. Marketing efforts to target prospective clients include the use
of proactive outbound telesales, traditional advertising, and electronic and traditional direct
mail programs. We also maintain a website featuring our outsourced business process services at
www.directalliance.com.
Industry
In response to competitive pressure and market demands for increased productivity and
reduced costs, the BPO market is rapidly growing and represents an attractive niche within the
broad services sector. BPO is heavily affected by offshore and near-shore influences including
Canada, India, China, the Philippines and other developing countries with lower wage costs.
Although international wages and tax preferences are a factor when clients consider BPO for
reducing costs, we believe that our ability to provide customized, integrated solutions competes
well on both a cost-only basis and on total client service value. We do not currently have
offshore BPO operations.
As more manufacturers desire swift access to the direct market and custom channel solutions to
drive partner sales, we believe they may elect to partner with BPO providers to achieve
cost-effective solutions. We believe that we will benefit from industry trends toward outsourcing
and that our total cost of operation compares favorably with other industry-leading companies.
Additionally, we believe that as businesses increase their familiarity with outsourcing
front-office sales and marketing operations, additional opportunities to outsource back-office
operations such as distribution, finance and returns management will become more compelling. As a
result, we believe companies will look to consolidate their outsourced processes to eliminate
redundant costs. Because we have service capabilities that span the full supply chain, we believe
we are well positioned to provide cost-effective, fully integrated solutions and establish broad
and deeply rooted relationships with our clients.
Competition
The growing BPO market is an industry characterized by intense competition, and we
compete with many companies within specific categories (e.g., outbound telesales, fulfillment or
direct marketing services). We have seen an increase in competitors in the market, including such
companies as PFSweb, Digital River, Modus Media and Convergys. In many instances, our competition
is the in-house operations of our potential clients who have not yet made the decision to outsource
a particular business process. We believe that our experience in establishing best practices for
sales and process management, as well as the technology developed to support our services,
differentiates us from competitors, including in-house operations. For a discussion of risks
associated with the actions of our competitors, see Risk Factors The IT products and services
industry is intensely competitive and actions of competitors, including manufacturers of products
we sell, can negatively affect our business, in Item 1A of this report.
Teammates
We believe our teammate relations are good. Our teammates are not represented by any
labor union, and we have not experienced any work stoppages. At December 31, 2005, we had 3,967
teammates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
Alliance
|
|
Consolidated
|
Management, support
services and
administration
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
Sales account executives
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
1,779
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
16
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
We have invested in our teammates future and our future through an ongoing program of
internal and external training. Training programs include new hire orientation, sales training,
general industry and computer education, technical training, specific product training and ongoing
teammate and management development programs. We emphasize on-the-job training and provide our
teammates and managers with development opportunities through online and classroom training
relevant to their needs.
Seasonality
General economic conditions have an effect on our business and results of operations. We
also experience some seasonal trends in the sale of our products and services. For example, sales
to the federal government in the United States are often stronger in our third quarter, sales in
the United Kingdom to large enterprise and government entities are often stronger in our first
quarter, and business clients, particularly large enterprise businesses in the United States, tend
to spend more in our fourth quarter as they utilize their remaining capital budget authorizations
and less in the first quarter. Due to the increased significance of our large enterprise business
in the United States, we expect that consolidated net sales and net earnings may be lower in the
first quarter of any year compared to the fourth quarter of the previous year.
Backlog
Virtually all of our backlog historically has been and continues to be open cancelable
purchase orders, and we do not believe that backlog as of any particular date is indicative of
future results.
Intellectual Property
We do not maintain a traditional research and development group, but we do develop and
seek to protect a range of intellectual property, including trademarks, service marks, copyrights,
domain name rights, trade dress, trade secrets and similar intellectual property. We rely on
applicable statutes and common law rights, trade-secret protection and confidentiality and license
agreements, as applicable, with teammates, clients, vendors and others to protect our intellectual
property rights. We have registered a number of domain names and our principal trademark is a
registered mark. We have also applied for registration of other marks, both in the United States
and in select international jurisdictions, and from time to time, file patent applications. We
may, in the future, license certain of our proprietary intellectual property rights to third
parties. It is important for us to work closely with computer product manufacturers and other
technology developers to stay current on the latest developments in technology in order to improve
our internal operations and for the benefit of our clients, and we have established an internal
center of excellence to do this. We believe our trademarks and service marks, in particular, have
significant value and we continue to invest in the promotion of our trademarks and service marks
and in our protection of them.
Available Information
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the reports of beneficial ownership filed
pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge on our website at
www.insight.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file with, or furnish
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Additionally, the public may read and copy any
materials that we file with
the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC
20549. Information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room is available by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains all of
information we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Changes in the information technology industry and/or economic environment may reduce
demand for the products and services we sell.
Our results of operations are influenced by a
variety of factors, including the condition of the IT industry, general economic conditions, shifts
in demand for, or availability of, computer products, peripherals and software and IT services and
industry introductions of new products, upgrades or methods of distribution. Net sales can be
dependent on demand for specific product categories, and any change in demand for or supply of such
products could have a material adverse effect on our net sales, and/or cause us to record
write-downs of obsolete inventory, if we fail to react in a timely manner to such changes. Our
operating results are also highly dependent upon our level of gross profit as a percentage of net
sales, which fluctuates due to numerous factors, including changes in prices from suppliers,
changes in the amount and timing of supplier reimbursements and marketing funds that are made
available, volumes of purchases, changes in client mix, the relative mix of products sold during
the period, general competitive conditions, the availability of opportunistic purchases
17
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
and
opportunities to increase market share. In addition, our expense levels, including marketing, the
costs of facilities expansion, acquisitions and the costs and salaries incurred in connection with
the hiring of account executives, are based, in part, on anticipated net sales and the anticipated
amount and timing of supplier reimbursements and marketing funds. Therefore, we may not be able to
reduce spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected net sales shortfall and any
such inability could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
We rely on our suppliers for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing incentives and
competitive products to sell.
We acquire products for resale both directly from manufacturers and
indirectly through distributors. The loss of a supplier could cause a disruption in the
availability of products. Additionally, there is no assurance that as manufacturers continue to
sell directly to end users and through the distribution channel, they will not limit or curtail the
availability of their product to resellers like us. Although not as prevalent in recent years,
certain of the products offered from time to time by us may become subject to manufacturer
allocation, which limits the number of units available to us. Our inability to obtain a sufficient
quantity of product, or an allocation of products from a manufacturer in a way that favors one of
our competitors relative to us, could cause us to be unable to fill clients orders in a timely
manner, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. In addition, a reduction in the amount of credit granted to us
by our suppliers could increase our cost of working capital and have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain manufacturers and distributors provide us with substantial incentives in the form of
rebates, supplier reimbursements and marketing funds, early payment discounts, referral fees and
price protections. Supplier funds are used to offset, among other things, inventory, cost of goods
sold, marketing costs and other operating expenses. Certain of these funds are based on our volume
of net sales or purchases, growth rate of net sales or purchases and marketing programs. If we do
not grow our net sales over prior periods or if we are not in compliance with the terms of these
programs, there could be a material negative effect on the amount of incentives offered or paid to
us by our manufacturers. Additionally, suppliers routinely change the requirements for, and the
amount of, funds available. No assurance can be given that we will continue to receive such
incentives or that we will be able to collect outstanding amounts relating to these incentives in a
timely manner, or at all. A reduction in, the discontinuance of, a significant delay in receiving
or the inability to collect such incentives could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Although product is available from multiple sources via the distribution channel as well as
directly from manufacturers, we rely on the manufacturers of products we offer not only for product
availability and supplier reimbursements, but also for development and marketing of products that
compete effectively with products of manufacturers we do not currently offer, particularly Dell.
We do have the ability to sell, and periodically have sold, Dell product if it is specifically
requested by our clients and approved by Dell, although we do not proactively advertise or offer
Dell products.
In May 2005, Lenovo, the leading personal computer brand in China, acquired IBMs Personal
Computing Division to form the worlds third-largest PC business. IBM is a significant supplier to
Insight and was the largest client of Direct Alliance. Direct Alliance has entered into separate
contracts with IBM and Lenovo representing pro-rata portions of the contract that Direct Alliance
previously had with IBM. These contracts were effective upon completion of Lenovos purchase of
IBMs Personal Computing Division. We do not know specifically how this sale will affect our
relationships over the long-term with IBM or Lenovo, and we cannot assure you that changes in these
relationships will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
The IT products and services industry is intensely competitive and actions of competitors,
including manufacturers of products we sell, can negatively affect our business.
Competition has
been based primarily on price, product availability, speed of delivery, credit availability and
quality and breadth of product lines and, increasingly, is also based on the ability to tailor
specific solutions to client needs. We compete with manufacturers, including manufacturers of
products we sell, as well as a large number and wide variety of marketers and resellers of IT
products and services. Product manufacturers, in particular, have programs to sell directly to the
business client, particularly larger corporate clients and thus, are a competitive threat to us.
In addition, manufacturers are increasing the volume of software products distributed
electronically directly to end-users and in the future will likely pay lower referral fees for
sales of certain software licensing agreements sold by us. An increase in the volume of products
sold through any of these competitive programs or distributed directly electronically to end-users
or a decrease in the amount of referral fees paid to us, or increased competition for providing
services to these clients, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Additionally, we believe our industry will see further consolidation as product resellers and
direct marketers combine operations or acquire or merge with other resellers and direct marketers
to increase efficiency and market share. Moreover, current and potential competitors have
established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to
enhance their product and service offerings. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or
alliances among competitors may emerge and acquire significant market share. Generally, pricing is
very aggressive in the industry, and we
18
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
expect pricing pressures to continue. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to negotiate prices as favorable as those negotiated by our
competitors or that we will be able to offset the effects of price reductions with an increase in
the number of clients, higher net sales, cost reductions, greater sales of services, which are
typically at higher gross margins, or otherwise. Price reductions by our competitors that we
either cannot or choose not to match could result in an erosion of our market share and/or reduced
sales or, to the extent we match such reductions, could result in reduced operating margins, any of
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Certain of our competitors in each of our operating segments have longer operating histories
and greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. In addition, some of
these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities,
technologies and client requirements. Many current and potential competitors also have greater
name recognition and engage in more extensive promotional activities, offer more attractive terms
to clients and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we do. Additionally, some of our
competitors have higher margins and/or lower operating cost structures, allowing them to price more
aggressively. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively with current
or future competitors or that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Disruptions in our information technology and voice and data networks could affect our ability
to service our clients and cause us to incur additional expenses.
We believe that our success to
date has been, and future results of operations will be, dependent in large part upon our ability
to provide prompt and efficient service to clients. Our ability to provide such services is
largely dependent on the accuracy, quality and utilization of the information generated by our IT
systems, which affect our ability to manage our sales, client service, distribution, inventories
and accounting systems and the reliability of our voice and data networks. In January 2004, we
completed the IT system conversion across all of Insights operations serving United States
clients. We have been making and will continue to make enhancements and upgrades to the system
including a planned upgrade to mySAP during 2006. Over the next few years, we plan to convert
Insights United Kingdom and Canadian operations to this software platform. There can be no
assurances that these enhancements or conversions will not cause disruptions in our business, and
any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition. Additionally, if we complete conversions that shorten the life of existing technology
or render it impaired, we could incur additional depreciation expense and/or impairment charges.
Although we have built redundancy into most of our systems, have documented system outage policies
and procedures and have comprehensive data backup, we do not have a formal disaster recovery or
business continuity plan. Substantial interruption in our IT systems or in our telephone
communication systems would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
We rely on a limited number of outsourcing clients.
Through our Direct Alliance operating
segment, which represented 2% and 11% of our consolidated net sales and earnings from operations,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2005, we perform business process outsourcing
services for a small number of clients in the IT, consumer electronics, software, warranties,
service contracts and office automation industries pursuant to various contracted arrangements.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, one outsourcing client accounted for approximately 28% of
Direct Alliances net sales and our three largest outsourcing clients accounted for approximately
76% of net sales. For the year ended December 31, 2004, one outsourcing client accounted for
approximately 60% of Direct Alliances net sales and our three largest outsourcing clients
accounted for approximately 88% of net sales. The declines from prior year in concentration
with Direct Alliances largest clients reflects the fact that the historical contract with Direct
Alliances largest client, IBM, was replaced in May 2005 with separate contracts with IBM and
Lenovo which expire at the end of 2006. Although the contracts with these clients are generally
multi-year contracts, these clients may cancel their contracts under certain circumstances on
relatively short notice, elect to not renew them upon expiration or renew them only on terms that
are less favorable to us. There is no assurance that we will be able to replace any outsourcing
clients that terminate or fail to renew their relationships with us or that we will be able to
renew existing contracts on terms that are as favorable to us as the current terms. Additionally,
we seek to expand our offerings both within and outside of the computer industry. The failure to
maintain current arrangements or the inability to enter into new ones within or outside the
computer industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. The majority of our current outsourcing business is with clients who are
manufacturers in the IT industry and are, therefore, subject to similar industry risks that we
face, with respect to our Insight North America operations. These risks may negatively affect the
amount of business our clients outsource to us and the performance fees we receive from clients
that are based on the volume of client product we sell or process through our systems.
The failure to comply with the terms and conditions of our public sector contracts could
result in, among other things, fines or other liabilities
. Net sales to public sector clients are
derived from sales to federal, state and local governmental departments and agencies, as well as to
educational institutions, through open market sales and various contracts. Government contracting
is a highly regulated area. Noncompliance with government procurement regulations or contract
provisions could result in civil, criminal, and administrative liability, including substantial
monetary fines or damages, termination of government contracts, and suspension, debarment or
ineligibility from doing business with the government. In
19
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
addition, substantially all of our
contracts in the public sector are terminable at any time for convenience or upon default. The
effect of any of these possible actions by any governmental department or agency or the adoption of
new or modified procurement regulations or practices could materially adversely affect our
business, financial position and results of operations.
There are risks associated with international operations that are different than those
inherent in the United States business.
We currently have operations in the United Kingdom and
Canada and may expand operations further globally. In implementing our international strategy, we
may face barriers to entry and competition from local companies and other companies that already
have established global businesses, as well as the risks generally associated with conducting
business internationally. These risks include local labor conditions and regulations, the ability
to attract and retain suitable local management, exposure to currency fluctuations, limitations on
foreign investment, potential tax exposure in repatriating earnings, and the additional expense and
risks inherent in operating in geographically and culturally diverse locations. Because we may
continue to develop our international business through acquisitions, we may also be subject to
risks associated with such acquisitions, including those relating to combining different corporate
cultures and shared decision-making. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in increasing
our international business or do so in a profitable manner.
International operations also expose us to currency fluctuations as we translate the financial
statements of our United Kingdom and Canadian operations to U.S. dollars. Although the effect of
currency fluctuations on our financial results has not generally been material in the past, there
can be no guarantee that the effect of currency fluctuations will not be material in the future.
In particular, there has been a trend toward a strengthening U.S. dollar relative to the British
pound sterling. If this trend continues, it could have a negative effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
We depend on certain key personnel.
Our future success will be largely dependent on the
efforts of key management personnel. Over the past year, we have replaced several key personnel,
including the President of Insight Direct USA, Inc. and the President of Direct Alliance with new
key personnel. The loss of one or more of these key teammates could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to continue to attract or retain highly qualified executive personnel or that any such
executive personnel will be able to lead us in directions that will increase stockholder value. We
also believe that our future success will be largely dependent on our continued ability to attract
and retain highly qualified management, sales, service and technical personnel. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to attract and retain such personnel. Further, we make a significant
investment in the training of our sales account executives. Our inability to retain such personnel
or to train them either rapidly enough to meet our expanding needs or in an effective manner for
quickly changing market conditions could cause a decrease in the overall quality and efficiency of
our sales staff, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Decreased effectiveness of equity compensation could adversely affect our ability to attract
and retain teammates, and changes in accounting for equity compensation will adversely affect
earnings.
We have historically used equity based
compensation, primarily in the form of stock options, as a key component of total teammate
compensation in order to align teammates interests with the interests of our stockholders,
encourage teammate retention and provide competitive compensation packages. Volatility or lack of
positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key teammates,
all of whom have been granted stock based compensation, or attract additional highly qualified
personnel. Many of our outstanding stock options have exercise prices in excess of our current
stock price. To the extent these circumstances continue or recur, our ability to retain present
teammates may be adversely affected. In addition, changes to GAAP require compensation expense to
be recorded for stock option grants and other equity based compensation beginning January 1, 2006.
Moreover, applicable stock exchange listing standards relating to obtaining stockholder approval of
equity compensation plans could make it more difficult or expensive for us to grant options to
teammates in the future. As a result, in addition to recording additional compensation expense, we
may incur increased compensation costs, change our stock compensation strategy or find it difficult
to use stock based compensation to attract, retain and motivate teammates, any of which could
materially adversely affect our business. Additionally, some of our competitors modified their
outstanding stock options in 2005 and, as a result, will decrease the amount of equity compensation
expense related to the modified stock options in their future statements of earnings. This could
result in our equity compensation expense being greater than our competitors in future periods.
The integration and operation of future acquired businesses may disrupt our business, create
additional expenses and utilize cash or debt availability.
Over the past few years, we completed
acquisitions in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. These acquired operations have
been fully integrated and now comprise a material portion of our business. Our strategy includes
the possible acquisition of other businesses to expand or complement our operations. An
acquisition involves numerous risks, including difficulties in the conversion of IT systems and
assimilation of operations of the acquired company, the diversion of managements attention from
other business concerns, risks of entering markets in
20
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
which we have had no or only limited direct
experience, assumption of unknown liabilities and the potential loss of key teammates and/or
clients of the acquired company, all of which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. The magnitude, timing and nature of any
future acquisitions will depend on a number of factors, including the availability of suitable
acquisition candidates, the negotiation of acceptable terms, our financial capabilities and general
economic and business conditions. There is no assurance that we will identify acquisition
candidates that would result in successful combinations or that any acquisitions will be
consummated at all or on acceptable terms. Any future acquisitions may result in potentially
dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, the utilization of
cash, amortization of expenses related to identifiable intangible assets and future impairments of
acquired goodwill, all of which could adversely affect our profitability.
Rapid changes in product standards may result in substantial inventory obsolescence.
The IT
industry is characterized by rapid technological change and the frequent introduction of new
products and product enhancements, both of which can decrease demand for current products or render
them obsolete. In addition, in order to satisfy client demand, protect ourselves against product
shortages, obtain greater purchasing discounts and react to changes in original equipment
manufacturers terms and conditions, we may decide to carry relatively high inventory levels of
certain products that may have limited or no return privileges. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to avoid losses related to inventory obsolescence on these products.
Our principal financing facility expires in December 2006, and if we are unable to renew this
facility or replace it on acceptable terms, we may incur higher interest expenses or your equity
interests may be diluted.
Our financing facilities include a $200.0 million accounts receivable
securitization financing facility, a $30.0 million revolving line of credit and a $40.0 million
inventories financing facility. The availability under each of these facilities is subject to
formulas based on our eligible trade accounts receivable or inventories. As of December 31, 2005,
the aggregate outstanding balance under these facilities was $70.6 million, and we had $193.2
million available. The accounts receivable securitization financing facility expires in December
2006, the line of credit expires on December 31, 2008 and the inventories financing facility
expires March 31, 2006. We have no reason to believe the accounts receivable securitization
financing facility will not be renewed before the end of 2006 and we are currently evaluating
whether to renew our inventories financing facility. However, it is possible that we may be unable
to renew our existing accounts receivable securitization financing facility or secure alternative
financing or, if we are able to renew our existing accounts receivable securitization financing
facility or secure alternative financing, it may be on less favorable terms, such as higher
interest rates. If we were unable to renew our existing accounts receivable securitization
financing facility or secure alternative financing, we may be required to seek other financing
alternatives such as selling additional equity securities or convertible debt securities that would
dilute the equity interests of current stockholders. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
obtain such financing on terms favorable to us or at all.
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which are costly to defend and
could limit our ability to provide certain content or use certain technologies in the future.
Many
parties are actively developing search, indexing, e-commerce and other web-related technologies, as
well as a variety of online business models and methods, all of which are in addition to
traditional research and development efforts for IT products and application software. We believe
that these parties will continue to take steps to protect these technologies, including, but not
limited to, seeking patent protection. As a result, disputes regarding the ownership of these
technologies and rights associated with online business and new hardware and software offerings are
likely to arise in the future. In addition to existing patents and intellectual property rights,
we anticipate that additional third party patents related to our services will be issued in the
future. From time to time, parties assert patent infringement claims against us in the form of
cease-and-desist letters, lawsuits and other communications. If there is a determination that we
have infringed the proprietary rights of others, we could incur substantial monetary liability, be
forced to stop selling infringing products or providing infringing services, be required to enter
into costly royalty or licensing agreements, if available, or be prevented from using the rights,
which could force us to change our business practices in the future. As a result, these types of
claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We issue options and restricted stock shares and units under our long-term incentive plans,
and these issuances dilute the interests of stockholders.
We have reserved shares of our common
stock for issuance under our 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan (the 1998 LTIP) and our 1999
BroadBased Incentive Plan. As approved by our stockholders, our 1998 LTIP provides that
additional shares of common stock may be reserved for issuance based on a formula contained in that
plan. The formula provides that the total number of shares of common stock remaining for grant
under the 1998 LTIP and any of our other option plans, plus the number of shares subject to
unexercised options and unvested grants of restricted stock granted under any plan, shall not
exceed 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the time of calculation of the
additional shares. Therefore, we reserve additional shares on an ongoing basis for issuance under
this plan. At December 31, 2005, we had options outstanding to acquire 7,122,391 shares of common
stock and there were 122,500 shares of restricted
21
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
common stock and 7,500 restricted common stock
units outstanding. Based on the 1998 LTIP formula, we had 2,294,915 shares of common stock
available for grant at December 31, 2005.
Additionally, we have reserved 15% of the outstanding shares of common stock of our
subsidiary, Direct Alliance, under the Direct Alliance 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan. At December
31, 2005, we had options outstanding to acquire 2,042,500 shares of common stock of Direct
Alliance, representing 6.8% of the outstanding common stock of Direct Alliance, at a weighted
average exercise price of $1.42. These stock options vested on May 5, 2005 and expire on May 5,
2006. If option holders exercise these options, they will become minority stockholders of Direct
Alliance, and the percentage of Direct Alliances net earnings attributable to minority
stockholders will not be included in our consolidated statement of earnings. As of December 31,
2005, none of the 2,042,500 outstanding options have been exercised.
When stock options with an exercise price lower than the current market price are exercised,
the risk increases that our stockholders will experience dilution of earnings per share due to the
increased number of shares outstanding. Also, the terms upon which we will be able to obtain
equity capital may be affected, because the holders of outstanding options can be expected to
exercise them at a time when we would, in all likelihood, be able to obtain needed capital on terms
more favorable to us than those provided in outstanding options.
Some anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
stockholders rights agreement, as well as provisions of Delaware law and executive employment
contracts, could impair a takeover attempt.
We have provisions in our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws which could have the effect (separately, or in combination) of rendering more difficult
or discouraging an acquisition deemed undesirable by our Board of Directors. These include
provisions:
|
|
|
authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting,
liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, directors and officers;
|
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings;
|
|
|
|
|
requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at
meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our
Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
|
controlling the procedures for conduct of Board and stockholder meetings and
election and removal of directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
specifying that stockholders may take action only at a duly called annual or special
meeting of stockholders.
|
These provisions, alone or together, could deter or delay hostile takeovers, proxy contests
and changes in control or management. As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions
of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some
stockholders from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of
substantially all of our outstanding common stock.
On December 14, 1998, each stockholder of record received one Preferred Share Purchase Right
(Right) for each outstanding share of common stock owned. Each Right entitles stockholders to
buy .00148 of a share of our Series A Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $88.88. The Rights
will be exercisable if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our common stock or announces a
tender offer for 15% or more of the common stock. However, should this occur, the Right will
entitle its holder to purchase, at the Rights exercise price, a number of shares of common stock
having a market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price. Rights held by the 15%
holder will become void and will not be exercisable to purchase shares at the bargain purchase
price. If we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person
acquires 15% or more of the our common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase at the
Rights then current exercise price a number of the acquiring companys common shares having a
market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price.
Additionally, we have employment agreements with certain officers and management teammates
under which severance payments would become payable in the event of specified terminations without
cause or terminations under certain circumstances after a change in control. If such persons were
terminated without cause or under certain circumstances after a change of control, and the
severance payments under the current employment agreements were to become payable, the severance
payments would generally be equal to either one or two times the persons annual salary and bonus.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or employment agreements, or
Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the
opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and also
could affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
22
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Sales of additional common stock and securities convertible into our common stock may
dilute the voting power of current holders.
We may issue equity securities in the future whose
terms and rights are superior to those of our common stock. Our certificate of incorporation
authorizes the issuance of up to 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock. These are blank check
preferred shares, meaning our Board of Directors is authorized, from time to time, to issue the
shares and designate their voting, conversion and other rights, all without stockholder consent.
No preferred shares are outstanding, and we currently do not intend to issue any shares of
preferred stock in the foreseeable future. Any shares of preferred stock that may be issued in the
future could be given voting and conversion rights that could dilute the voting power and equity of
existing holders of shares of common stock and have preferences over shares of common stock with
respect to dividends and liquidation rights.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.
Properties
Our principal executive offices are located at 1305 West Auto Drive, Tempe, Arizona
85284. We conduct sales, distribution, services, and administrative activities in owned and leased
facilities, and some of our face-to-face field account executives conduct business from home
offices. We have renewal rights in most of our property leases, and we anticipate that we will be
able to extend these leases on terms satisfactory to us or, if necessary, locate substitute
facilities on acceptable terms. We believe that our facilities will be suitable and adequate for
our present purposes, and that the capacity in the majority of our facilities is not fully
utilized. In the future, we may need to purchase, build or lease additional facilities to meet the
requirements projected in our long-term business plan. If we decide to exit the current leases, we
may have to continue to make payments under the current leases or pay penalties to cancel the
leases.
Information about sales, distribution, services and administration facilities in use as of
December 31, 2005 is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Segment
|
|
Location
|
|
Primary Activities
|
|
Own or Lease
|
Headquarters
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Executive Offices
|
|
Own
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight North America
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own
|
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Administration
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Bloomingdale, Illinois, USA
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own
|
|
|
Hanover Park, Illinois, USA
|
|
Services and Distribution
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own
|
|
|
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
Sheffield, England
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own
|
|
|
Sheffield, England
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Greater Manchester, England
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Uxbridge, Middlesex, England
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Sales, Administration
and Distribution
|
|
Own
|
In addition to those listed above, Insight North America has leased sales offices in various
cities across the United States and Canada. For additional information on operating leases, see
Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. We also have leased
facilities in the United Kingdom that are no longer in use due to the integration of previous
acquisitions. These properties are not included in the table above.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during our 2005 fourth
quarter.
23
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II
Item 5.
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock trades under the symbol NSIT on the Nasdaq National Market. The
following table shows, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing price per
share for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
Low Price
|
Year 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
$
|
18.14
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
21.19
|
|
|
|
18.20
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
20.47
|
|
|
|
17.39
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
20.36
|
|
|
|
17.23
|
|
Year 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.62
|
|
|
$
|
16.85
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
17.28
|
|
|
|
14.08
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
16.13
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
22.65
|
|
|
|
17.98
|
|
As of February 10, 2006, we had 48,013,356 shares of common stock outstanding held by
approximately 127 stockholders of record. This figure does not include an estimate of the number
of beneficial holders whose shares are held of record by brokerage firms and clearing agencies.
We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock, and our credit facilities prohibit the
payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent. We intend to retain all of our earnings
for use in our business and currently do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
The information required by this item and included under the caption Securities Authorized
for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans can be found in our definitive Proxy Statement
relating to our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 4, 2006 (our Proxy Statement)
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
Approximate dollar value
|
|
|
Total number of
|
|
(b)
|
|
purchased as part of
|
|
of shares that may yet be
|
|
|
shares
|
|
Average price
|
|
publicly announced
|
|
purchased under the
|
Period
|
|
purchased
|
|
paid per share
|
|
plans or programs
|
|
plans or programs
(1)
|
October 1, 2005 through
October 31, 2005
|
|
|
49,644
|
|
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
49,644
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
November 1, 2005 through
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
49,644
|
|
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
49,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On March 3, 2005, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the
purchase of up to $25,000,000 of our common stock. On May 12, 2005, we announced that our
Board of Directors had authorized a $25,000,000 increase to the stock repurchase program
announced on March 3, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, we had purchased 2,725,644 shares of
our common stock at a total cost of $49,998,000 (an average price of $18.34), which
completed this stock repurchase program. These amounts include 49,644 shares purchased
during the fourth quarter for $921,363 (an average price of $18.56). All shares
repurchased have been retired.
On January 26, 2006, we announced that
our Board of Directors had authorized the purchase of up to an additional $50,000,000 of
our
common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time in both open market and private
transactions, as conditions warrant.
|
24
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto in Item 8 and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of this report. The selected
consolidated financial data presented below under the captions Consolidated Statements of
Operations Data and Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of and for each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 2005 are derived from the consolidated financial statements of
the Company, which have been audited by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting
firm. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and the independent auditors report
thereon, are included in Item 8 of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,261,150
|
|
|
$
|
3,082,725
|
|
|
$
|
2,886,047
|
|
|
$
|
2,875,895
|
|
|
$
|
2,073,397
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
2,869,239
|
|
|
|
2,712,294
|
|
|
|
2,546,586
|
|
|
|
2,547,486
|
|
|
|
1,837,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
391,911
|
|
|
|
370,431
|
|
|
|
339,461
|
|
|
|
328,409
|
|
|
|
236,349
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
289,250
|
|
|
|
285,742
|
|
|
|
279,539
|
|
|
|
248,994
|
|
|
|
163,378
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
|
12,967
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
3,465
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous
acquisition
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
(2,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses related to closure of German
operation
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
Acquisition
integration expenses
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,194
|
|
Aborted IPO
costs
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Amortization
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
90,358
|
|
|
|
85,871
|
|
|
|
58,961
|
|
|
|
(15,072
|
)
|
|
|
52,712
|
|
Non-operating (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3,394
|
)
|
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(1,836
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
|
90,985
|
|
|
|
84,816
|
|
|
|
54,714
|
|
|
|
(19,664
|
)
|
|
|
52,097
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
35,641
|
|
|
|
24,729
|
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
|
|
24,451
|
|
|
|
18,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
55,344
|
|
|
|
60,087
|
|
|
|
35,762
|
|
|
|
(44,115
|
)
|
|
|
33,473
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operation, net of
taxes of
$0,
$6,753, $858, $527, and $240,
respectively
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,441
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
55,344
|
|
|
|
80,528
|
|
|
|
37,754
|
|
|
|
(42,840
|
)
|
|
|
33,887
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of taxes of $330 in 2005
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
$
|
80,528
|
|
|
$
|
37,754
|
|
|
$
|
(42,840
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
48,553
|
|
|
|
48,389
|
|
|
|
46,315
|
|
|
|
44,808
|
|
|
|
41,460
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
49,042
|
|
|
|
49,231
|
|
|
|
46,885
|
|
|
|
44,808
|
|
|
|
42,388
|
|
25
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
389,523
|
|
|
$
|
371,267
|
|
|
$
|
240,298
|
|
|
$
|
181,331
|
|
|
$
|
164,832
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
922,340
|
|
|
|
887,641
|
|
|
|
792,124
|
|
|
|
773,731
|
|
|
|
595,571
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
55,275
|
|
|
|
94,592
|
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
Long-term debt (including line of
credit)
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,004
|
|
|
|
13,146
|
|
|
|
54,752
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
566,024
|
|
|
|
559,559
|
|
|
|
439,369
|
|
|
|
375,291
|
|
|
|
320,054
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Our consolidated financial statements above include results of acquisitions from
their respective acquisition dates. See further discussion in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financials Statements in Item 8 of this report.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Goodwill Impairment.
Based on results of our 2002 annual goodwill impairment
assessment, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $91.6 million, which
represented the entire goodwill balance recorded at Insight UK.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Expenses Related to Closure of German Operation
. Effective November 15, 2001, we
closed our German operation and recorded a charge of $10.6 million, due primarily to the
write-off of goodwill and the recognition of the cumulative foreign currency translation
adjustment.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Acquisition integration expenses.
In connection with acquisitions of companies in
the United Kingdom and Canada in 2001, we recorded charges relating to integration expenses
totaling $7.2 million, primarily representing write-offs of fixed assets, leasehold
improvements and government grant receivables as well as severance costs and lease termination
expenses.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Aborted IPO Costs.
In 2001, we withdrew the planned initial public offering and
spin-off of Direct Alliance Corporation and recorded a $1.4 million charge for the costs of
the aborted IPO.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Amortization.
In accordance with SFAS No.142, the amortization of goodwill
was discontinued as of January 1, 2002 and therefore
there was no goodwill amortization expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Goodwill amortization expense was $1.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The $1.4 million recorded relates to amortization
of intangible assets, namely a trade name, obtained in connection with an acquisition in 2002.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Earnings From Discontinued Operation
. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we
sold our 95% ownership in PlusNet, an internet
service provider in the United Kingdom. Accordingly, we have accounted for PlusNet as a
discontinued operation and have reported PlusNets results of operations as a discontinued
operation in the consolidated statement of earnings. Included in earnings from discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 is the gain on the sale of PlusNet of $23.7
million, $18.3 million net of taxes.
|
26
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and the related notes that appear in Item 8 of this report.
Overview
We are a leading provider of IT products and services to businesses in the United States,
Canada and the United Kingdom. Our offerings include brand name computing products, IT services
and outsourcing of business processes. As of December 31, 2005, we were organized in the following
operating segments:
|
|
|
Provider of IT products and services North America (Insight North America);
|
|
|
|
|
Provider of IT products and services United Kingdom (Insight UK); and
|
|
|
|
|
Business process outsourcing provider (Direct Alliance).
|
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 5.8% to $3.3 billion from $3.1
billion for the year ended December 31, 2004. Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2005
decreased 32% to $54.7 million from $80.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, diluted earnings per share decreased to $1.12 from $1.64 for the year
ended December 31, 2004. Net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December
31, 2005 include the following items:
|
|
|
restructuring expenses related to Insight UKs move to a new facility in December
2005 of $6.9 million ($4.6 million, net of tax) representing the remaining lease
obligations on the current lease and $1.0 million ($692,000 net of tax) for
duplicate rent expense for the new facility for the last half of 2005;
|
|
|
|
|
severance and restructuring expenses attributable to the elimination of certain
sales, support and management functions, including the former Presidents of Insight
North America and Direct Alliance, of $5.1 million ($3.1 million, net of tax);
|
|
|
|
|
income from reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition of
$664,000 ($306,000 net of tax); and
|
|
|
|
|
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle related to our
compliance with FASB Financial Interpretation No. 47
Accounting for Conditional
Asset Retirement Obligations
(FIN 47) of $649,000, net of tax.
|
Net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2004 included the following items:
|
|
|
gain on the sale of shares of a discontinued operation of $23.7 million ($18.3 million net of taxes);
|
|
|
|
|
non-tax deductible bonus expenses of approximately $3.2 million, including
employer taxes, related to a management incentive plan with the top executives at a
discontinued operation;
|
|
|
|
|
severance and restructuring expenses of $2.4 million ($1.5 million net of taxes)
related to the severance associated with the elimination of certain sales, support
and management functions;
|
|
|
|
|
expenses of $1.3 million ($800,000 net of taxes) associated with hiring our chief
executive officer;
|
|
|
|
|
income from reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition of $3.6
million ($2.4 million net of taxes);
|
|
|
|
|
tax benefit of $5.5 million recorded for the reduction in the deferred tax
valuation allowance due to consistent profitability of our operations in the UK and
the expected future profitability of these operations; and
|
|
|
|
|
tax benefit of $1.3 million for valuation allowance reversals on depreciation
allowance carry forwards and bad debt provisions.
|
Although included in our consolidated financial statements, we exclude the items noted above
when internally evaluating selling and administrative expenses, earnings from operations, tax
expense, net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the Company and when evaluating selling
and administrative expenses and earnings from operations for our individual operating segments. We
exclude these items to evaluate financial performance against budgeted amounts, to calculate
incentive compensation, to assist in forecasting future performance and to compare our results to
competitors financial results.
27
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Overall, we believe we grew net sales in 2005 at rates consistent with market growth
rates and improved our overall profitability, when we exclude the items noted above. Overviews of
each of our operating segments are noted below and reconciliations of segment results of operations
to consolidated results of operations can be found in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this report.
Insight North America reported year over year growth in net sales and earnings from operations
of 6.1% and 22%, respectively. We believe that our sales growth rate was near market growth rates,
although we did not reach our internal targets of growing faster than the market. We were
encouraged by overall growth in our sales to large corporate enterprises, but demand in this sector
began to slow near the end of 2005. We were also pleased to see that the second half of 2005
brought increased growth rates in sales to SMB clients after several quarters of experiencing
stalled growth. During 2005, we made changes in our Insight North America executive management
team, sales leadership, recruiting and training and have increased our marketing activities, all of
which we believe will help position us to increase sales growth in the future. We also recorded
$3.7 million ($2.2 million net of tax) of severance charges related the elimination of certain
sales, support and management functions, including the former President of Insight Worldwide. These
restructuring activities were designed to provide additional resources for our efforts to improve
SMB sales and to automate key business processes, flatten the organizational structure and increase
the effectiveness of our management team. These activities allow us to devote resources to hire
additional account executives and sales managers, as well as to increase the effectiveness of our
marketing, skills development, human resources and IT systems, while continuing to focus on
reducing selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales. Our financial goals for
2006 are focused on growing net sales faster than the market and improving our operating margin. A
discussion of our strategy to accomplish these goals can be found in
Item 1 of this report.
Net sales for Insight UK for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 4.2% compared to the
year ended December 31, 2004. In British pound sterling, we posted an increase in net sales of
5.0% compared to 2004. The overall demand for IT products and services in the United Kingdom has
been very slow. However, we believe our sales growth was greater than the overall market growth
rate in the United Kingdom. We believe our additions of experienced account executives and
management focus on large corporate enterprises, as well as various internal initiatives in areas
such as training and automation to drive sales growth across all client groups, contributed to our
ability to grow sales amidst a challenging demand environment. We also eliminated certain sales,
support and management functions to streamline our operations and, as a result, recorded $414,000
($281,000, net of tax) of severance charges during 2005. At the end of 2005, we moved our London
facility to a new location and recorded restructuring charges of $6.9 million ($4.6 million, net of
tax) representing the remaining lease obligations on the old lease and $1.0 million ($692,000 net
of tax) for duplicate rent expense for the new facility prior to the date we relocated. We believe
this new facility will provide a better layout for our business model with additional room for
growth. This facility is also in a more desirable location, which should improve teammate
recruitment, retention, productivity and morale.
Net sales for Direct Alliance for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 4.5% while
earnings from operations decreased 15% for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in net
sales was due primarily to pass-through product sales that are transacted as an accommodation to
our clients at little or no gross margin. The decline in earnings from operations was due
primarily to the renegotiated fee structures as part of multi-year contract renewals with some of
Direct Alliances largest clients. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we also recorded $1.0
million ($621,000 net of tax) of severance charges related to the departure of Direct Alliances
former president.
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to
assist in the understanding of our consolidated financial statements, the changes in certain key
items in those consolidated financial statements from year to year, the primary factors that
contributed to those changes, as well as how certain critical accounting estimates affect our
consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
General
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For a summary of significant accounting
policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. The
preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Members of our senior
management have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these
28
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Actual results, however,
may differ from estimates we have made. We believe the following critical accounting estimates
reflect our significant estimates and assumptions used in preparation of the consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
We currently have various stock-based compensation plans under which we have granted
stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs) to certain teammates and
non-employee directors. To account for our fixed plan stock options, we currently apply the
intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB No. 25) and related interpretations including
FASB Interpretation No. 44,
Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation an
interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25.
Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the
date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price.
SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123) established accounting and
disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, we applied the intrinsic value-based method of
accounting described above and have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. We
determine the estimated fair value of stock options on the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton (Black-Scholes) option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model
requires us to apply highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility,
expected life of the option and the risk-free interest rate. A change in one or more of the
assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may result in a material change to the
estimated fair value of the stock-based compensation.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS
No. 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123 and APB No. 25. Effective January 1, 2006, we have adopted
SFAS No.123R, as discussed under Recently Issued Accounting Standards in Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report, and we will be recording compensation expense for
stock options in our financial statements. We elected to not make any modifications to existing
stock options outstanding prior to this date, such as accelerating the vesting of previously
granted options as we did not believe it made business sense to do so. We did, however, take the
opportunity to reevaluate our equity compensation plans and we have elected to issue service-based
and performance-based RSUs instead of stock options in 2006. The number of RSUs ultimately awarded
under the performance-based RSUs will vary based on achievement of certain financial results. We
will record compensation expense each period based on our estimate of the most probable number of
RSUs that will be issued under the grants of performance-based RSUs. Additionally, the
compensation expense will be reduced for our estimate of forfeitures. Our 2006 equity compensation
expense, which includes expense attributable to RSU grants, as well as to vesting of stock options
and restricted stock issued in prior years, is estimated to be between $13 million and $14 million.
The actual amount will likely vary, either higher or lower, based on achievement of 2006 financial
results. The expense range given assumes target financial results are reached.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
Our accounts receivable balance was $480.4 million and $447.9 million as of December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $15.9 million and $15.5
million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The allowance is determined using
estimated losses on accounts receivable based on historical write-offs, evaluation of the aging of
the receivables and the current economic environment. Should our clients circumstances change or
actual collections of client and vendor receivables differ from our estimates, adjustments to the
provision for losses on accounts receivable and the related allowances for doubtful accounts would
be recorded. See further information on our allowance for doubtful accounts in Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
Write-downs of Inventories
We evaluate inventories for excess, obsolescence or other factors that may render
inventories unmarketable at normal margins. Write-downs are recorded so that inventories reflect
the approximate net realizable value and take into account our contractual provisions with our
suppliers governing price protection, stock rotation and return privileges relating to
obsolescence. Because of the large number of transactions and the complexity of managing the
process around price protections and stock rotations, estimates are made regarding write-downs of
the carrying amount of inventories. Additionally, assumptions about future demand, market
conditions and decisions by manufacturers to discontinue certain products or product lines can
affect our decision to write down inventories. If our assumptions about future demand change or
actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected, additional write-downs of
inventories may be required. In any case, actual values could be different from those estimated.
29
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets Including Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill
We review property, plant and equipment, and purchased intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Our asset impairment review assesses the fair value of the assets based on the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net
proceeds expected from disposition of the asset (if any) and compares the fair value to the
carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for
the difference. This approach uses our estimates of future market growth, forecasted net sales and
costs, expected periods the assets will be utilized, and appropriate discount rates.
Annually, during the fourth quarter of each year, we assess whether goodwill is impaired.
Upon determining the existence of goodwill impairment, we measure that impairment based on the
amount by which the book value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The implied fair value
of goodwill is determined by deducting the fair value of a reporting units identifiable assets and
liabilities from the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole. Determining the fair value of
reporting units, as well as identifiable assets and liabilities, uses our estimates of market
capitalization allocation, future market growth, forecasted sales and costs and appropriate
discount rates. Additional impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis if we
encounter events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that, more likely than not, the
book value of goodwill has been impaired. Based on impairment tests performed, there was no
impairment of goodwill for years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 or 2003.
We identify potential impairment of goodwill through our strategic reviews of our reporting
units and operations performed in conjunction with restructuring actions. Deterioration of our
business in a geographic region or within a reporting unit in the future could lead to impairment
adjustments as such issues are identified. When impairment is identified, the carrying amount of
the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value.
Severance and Restructuring Activities
We have engaged, and may continue to engage, in severance and restructuring activities
which require us to utilize significant estimates related primarily to employee termination
benefits, estimated costs to terminate leases or remaining lease commitments on unused facilities,
net of estimated subleases. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, adjustments to
severance and restructuring expense in subsequent periods would be necessary. We do not currently
expect the remaining estimates to increase in the future; however, if we are successful in
negotiating early terminations of these leases, the remaining estimates may decrease. A detailed
description of our severance, restructuring and acquisition integration activities and remaining
accruals for these activities at December 31, 2005 can be found in Note 8 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
Taxes on Earnings
Our effective tax rate includes the effect of certain undistributed foreign earnings for
which no United States taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be reinvested
indefinitely outside the United States. Earnings remittance amounts are planned based on the
projected cash flow needs as well as the working capital and long-term investment requirements of
our foreign subsidiaries and our domestic operations. Material changes in our estimates of cash,
working capital and long-term investment requirements could affect our effective tax rate.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more
likely than not to be realized. We consider past operating results, future market growth,
forecasted earnings, historical and projected taxable income, the mix of earnings in the
jurisdictions in which we operate, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies and statutory tax
law changes in determining the need for a valuation allowance. If we were to determine that we
would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an
adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to earnings in the period such determination
is made. Likewise, if we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax
assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. In 2004,
due to the historical and expected profitability of our UK operations, we reduced the valuation
allowance and recorded a tax benefit of $5.5 million. Additional information about the valuation
allowance can be found in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
report.
30
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations
(FIN No. 47) during the year ended December 31, 2005. FIN No. 47 states that
companies must recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform
asset-retirement activities that are conditional on a future event if the amount can be reasonably
estimated. This interpretation applies to certain provisions in our facility lease agreements in
the United States and the United Kingdom. Some of our leases stipulate that any leasehold
improvements performed by us with landlord approval become the landlords property upon expiration
of the lease. However, some landlords further reserve the right to make the determination as to
whether the premises must be returned to their original condition, normal wear and tear excepted,
at our expense. As a result, we were required to estimate the fair value of our legal obligation to
perform asset-retirement activities upon a future lease termination date. The actual costs to
perform these activities may differ from our estimate. Additional information about the cumulative
effect of this change in accounting principle can be found in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this report.
Contingencies
From time to time, we are subject to potential claims and assessments from third parties.
We are also subject to various governmental, client and vendor audits. We continually assess
whether or not such claims have merit and warrant accrual under the probable and estimable
criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 5
Accounting for Contingencies.
Where
appropriate, we accrue estimates of anticipated liabilities in the financial statements. Such
estimates are subject to change and may affect our results of operations and our cash flows.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods presented certain financial data as a
percentage of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Non-operating (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
taxes in 2005
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
2005 Compared to 2004
Net Sales.
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 5.8% to $3.3 billion
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. Our net sales by operating segment were as follows
(in thousands):
31
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
% Change
|
Insight North America
|
|
$
|
2,713,468
|
|
|
$
|
2,557,402
|
|
|
6.1%
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
470,239
|
|
|
|
451,202
|
|
|
4.2%
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
77,443
|
|
|
|
74,121
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,261,150
|
|
|
$
|
3,082,725
|
|
|
5.8%
|
Insight North Americas net sales increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 by 6.1% to
$2.7 billion compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in net sales over the
prior year periods is due primarily to a stable demand environment and our initiatives to deliver
technology solutions to business clients more effectively and efficiently. During the latter half
of 2005, we saw increased growth rates in sales to SMB clients while growth rates in sales to our
large enterprise clients declined from the first half of the year. We have made changes in our
Insight North America executive management team, sales leadership, recruiting and training and have
increased marketing activities, all of which we believe will help position us to increase growth
rates in our sales to SMB clients in 2006. Insight North America had 1,074 account executives at
December 31, 2005 compared with 1,106 at December 31, 2004. The decrease in account executives was
due to planned headcount reductions in order to reduce costs and increase the productivity of the
remaining account executives. Additionally, we delayed increasing the number of account executives
while we restructured the fundamentals of our recruiting processes and our new hire training
program. Net sales per average account executive in Insight North America increased 15% from $2.2
million for the year ended December 31, 2004 to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,
which we believe is attributable to internal initiatives, such as training and automation, all of
which are designed to allow our account executives to work more productively. The average tenure
of our account executives in Insight North America has also increased from 3.5 years at December
31, 2004 to 3.9 years at December 31, 2005. The increase is due primarily to a decrease in account
executive turnover.
Insight UKs net sales increased 4.2% to $470.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. In British pound sterling, net sales increased 5.0%
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, a rate we believe to be faster than the market. We
believe our additions of experienced account executives and management focused on large corporate
enterprises, as well as our various internal initiatives to drive sales growth across all client
groups, contributed to our ability to increase our market share in the United Kingdom during the
year ended December 31, 2005. Insight UK had 266 account executives at December 31, 2005 compared
to 298 at December 31, 2004. The decrease is due primarily to aggressive recruiting of our more
experienced account executives by some of our competition in early 2005. Net sales per average
account executive in Insight UK increased 7% from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, which we believe is attributable to internal
initiatives designed to allow our account executives to work more productively. The average tenure
of our account executives in Insight UK increased to 2.3 years compared to 2.2 years at December
31, 2004 due primarily to a decrease in new hires during the current year.
Net sales by product category for Insight North America and Insight UK were as follows for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight North America
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Percentage of Product
|
|
Percentage of Product
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
Product Categories
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
Computers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notebooks and PDAs
|
|
17%
|
|
16%
|
|
18%
|
|
18%
|
Desktops and Servers
|
|
16%
|
|
18%
|
|
15%
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
34%
|
|
33%
|
|
31%
|
Software
|
|
12%
|
|
12%
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
Network and Connectivity
|
|
12%
|
|
11%
|
|
8%
|
|
8%
|
Printers
|
|
8%
|
|
9%
|
|
8%
|
|
10%
|
Storage Devices
|
|
8%
|
|
7%
|
|
8%
|
|
7%
|
Supplies and Accessories
|
|
7%
|
|
7%
|
|
8%
|
|
8%
|
Memory and Processors
|
|
5%
|
|
6%
|
|
4%
|
|
4%
|
Monitors and Video
|
|
7%
|
|
7%
|
|
10%
|
|
11%
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
8%
|
|
7%
|
|
6%
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
32
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
In general, we continue to experience declines in average selling prices for most of our
product categories, which requires us to sell more units than in previous periods in order to
maintain or increase the level of sales. Additionally, average selling prices for printers,
monitors, desktops and notebooks have been declining at a greater rate than the other product
categories as demand and competition for these products have increased. The largest product
category continues to be computers, representing 33% of Insight North America product net sales and
33% of Insight UK product sales for the year ended December 31, 2005. In both Insight North
America and Insight UK, client demand for computer refreshes, server consolidations, as well as IT
solutions related to connectivity, security and data retention needs appears to be increasing.
These business needs are resulting in increased sales of storage, monitors/video and
network/connectivity products in Insight North America and in sales of storage,
network/connectivity and computers in the United Kingdom.
Direct Alliances net sales of $77.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased
4.5% compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in net sales was due primarily to
pass-through product sales that are transacted as an accommodation to our clients at little or no
gross margin. Direct Alliances net sales are mainly concentrated with manufacturers of IT and
consumer electronics products. For the year ended December 31, 2005, Direct Alliances largest
outsourcing client accounted for 28% of Direct Alliances net sales compared to 60% for the year
ended December 31, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2005, Direct Alliances top three
outsourcing clients accounted for approximately 76% of Direct Alliances net sales compared to 88%
for the year ended December 31, 2004. The declines in concentration with Direct Alliances largest
clients were primarily due to the fact that the historical contract with Direct Alliances largest
client, IBM, was replaced in May 2005 with separate contracts with IBM and Lenovo.
Gross Profit
. Gross profit increased 6% to $391.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $370.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales, gross
profit remained consistent at 12.0% for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Our gross
profit and gross profit as a percent of net sales by operating segment for the year ended December
31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Sales
|
Insight North America
|
|
$
|
311,125
|
|
|
11.5%
|
|
$
|
289,604
|
|
|
11.3%
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
63,415
|
|
|
13.5%
|
|
|
61,594
|
|
|
13.7%
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
17,371
|
|
|
22.4%
|
|
|
19,233
|
|
|
25.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
391,911
|
|
|
12.0%
|
|
$
|
370,431
|
|
|
12.0%
|
Insight North Americas gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 by 7% to
$311.1 million from $289.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net
sales, gross profit increased to 11.5% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 11.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2004 due primarily to increases in freight margin, increases in referral fees
from Microsoft for enterprise agreements, increases in supplier reimbursements as a percentage of
net sales and increases in services. These increases were partially offset by decreases in product
margin due to the increase in the percentage of sales to large corporate enterprise clients, which
are generally transacted at lower product margins and an increase in the write-downs of inventories
as a percentage of sales.
Insight UKs gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 by 3% to $63.4
million from $61.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit decreased to 13.5% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 13.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 due primarily to decreases in product margin resulting from an aggressive pricing
environment as well as some product mix shift to lower margin products and a decrease in service
sales. These downward pressures on gross profit were offset partially by decreases in the
write-downs of inventories as a percentage of sales and increases in supplier discounts.
Direct Alliances gross profit decreased 10% for the year ended December 31, 2005 to $17.4
million from $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit decreased to 22.4% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 25.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The overall decrease in the year ended December 31, 2005 compared with the year
ended December 31, 2004 is due primarily to renegotiated fee structures as part of multi-year
contract renewals with some of Direct Alliances largest clients. These decreases were offset
partially by increases in gross profit from other client programs.
Operating Expenses.
Selling and Administrative Expenses.
Selling and administrative expenses increased 1% to
$289.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $285.7 million for the year ended December
31, 2004, but decreased as a percent of net sales
33
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
to 8.9% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
9.3% for the year ended December 31, 2004. Selling and administrative expenses as a percent of net
sales by operating segment for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Sales
|
Insight North America
|
|
$
|
232,166
|
|
|
8.6%
|
|
$
|
225,956
|
|
|
8.8%
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
50,771
|
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
53,454
|
|
|
11.8%
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
8.2%
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
8.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
289,250
|
|
|
8.9%
|
|
$
|
285,742
|
|
|
9.3%
|
Insight North Americas selling and administrative expenses increased for the year ended
December 31, 2005 by 3% to $232.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. As a
percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 8.6% for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from 8.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004. In 2005, Insight North America
benefited from increased net sales, savings from restructuring activities and increases in
operational efficiencies. These savings were offset by increased expenses in areas we are
investing in for growth, most notably marketing, information technology and training.
Additionally, selling and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 included
$1.2 million of expenses associated with the hiring of our chief executive officer.
Insight UKs selling and administrative expenses decreased 5% to $50.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net
sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 10.8% for the year ended December 31, 2005
from 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease is primarily due to bonus expenses
recorded in 2004 of $3.2 million, including employer taxes, related to management incentive plans
with the top executives at a discontinued operation. In 2005, Insight UK also benefited from
increased net sales, savings from restructuring activities and increases in operational
efficiencies. These savings were offset by increased expenses in areas we are investing in for
growth, most notably marketing, sales support and sales compensation plans.
Direct Alliances selling and administrative expenses remained consistent at $6.3 million for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. As a percentage of net sales, selling and
administrative expenses decreased to 8.2% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 8.5% for the
year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage
of sales is due primarily to an increase in net sales. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we
also increased our focus on controlling administrative expenses, which was offset primarily by
increases in expenses related to information technology.
Severance and Restructuring Expenses.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, Insight UK
moved into a new facility and recorded restructuring costs of $6.9 million for the remaining lease
obligations on the previous lease and $1.0 million for duplicate rent expense for the new facility
for the last half of 2005. Also, during 2005, Insight North America, Insight UK and Direct
Alliance recorded severance and restructuring expenses of $3.7 million, $414,000 and $1.0 million,
respectively, for severance attributable to the elimination of 90 positions, primarily in support
and management. These amounts included the severance for the former President of Insight North
America of $2.4 million and the President of Direct Alliance for $1.0 million. During the year
ended December 31, 2004, Insight North America, Insight UK and Direct Alliance recorded $2.0
million, $377,000 and $83,000, respectively, of severance and restructuring expenses attributable
to the elimination of certain sales, support and management functions. These amounts included $1.6
million recorded for the retirement of our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer,
General Counsel and Secretary and our agreement to terminate his employment agreement without
cause. See Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report of this report for
further discussion of all severance and restructuring activities.
Reductions in Liabilities Assumed in Previous Acquisition
. During the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, Insight UK settled certain liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition for
$664,000 and $3.6 million, respectively, less than
the amounts originally recorded. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item
8 of this report of this report for further discussion.
Interest Income
. Interest income of $3.4 million and $1.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, was generated through short-term investments. The increase in
interest income is due to a generally higher level of cash available to be invested in short-term
investments and increases in interest rates earned on those investments during the year ended
December 31, 2005.
34
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Interest Expense
. Interest expense of $1.9 million and $2.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily relates to borrowings under our financing
facilities. The decrease in interest expense is due to a reduction in the amounts outstanding
under our interest-bearing financing facilities, offset partially by increases in interest rates
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Other Expense, Net
. Other expense, net, decreased to $853,000 for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $893,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. These amounts consist primarily of bank
fees associated with our financing facilities and cash management, miscellaneous investment gains
or losses and foreign currency transaction gains or losses. In 2004, we recorded gains from
Insight UKs sale of a building of $328,000 and Direct Alliances sale of stock upon exercise of
stock options that were received from a client several years ago as compensation for a note payable
extension of $516,000. These gains were offset partially by non-operating expenses in 2004 of
$400,000 related to the losses and write-off of an equity method investee.
Income Tax Expense
. Our effective tax rates for continuing operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 were 39.2% and 29.2%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the year
ended December 31, 2005 was higher than for the year ended December 31, 2004 primarily due to a
$5.5 million tax benefit recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of a decrease
in the deferred tax valuation allowance for our United Kingdom operations. The increase in the
rate for 2005 is also due to a higher percentage of earnings that are taxable in the United States
at higher rates.
Earnings from Discontinued Operation.
In 2004, we sold our entire investment in PlusNet.
Accordingly, the gain on the sale and the results of operations attributable to PlusNet are
disclosed as a discontinued operation. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item
8 of this report for further discussion.
2004 Compared to 2003
Net Sales.
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased 7% to $3.1 billion
from $2.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net sales by operating segment for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
% Change
|
Insight North America
|
|
$
|
2,557,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,430,005
|
|
|
5%
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
451,202
|
|
|
|
379,785
|
|
|
19%
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
74,121
|
|
|
|
76,257
|
|
|
(3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,082,725
|
|
|
$
|
2,886,047
|
|
|
7%
|
Insight North Americas sales increased for the year ended December 31, 2004 by 5% to $2.6
billion from $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003. The sales growth in 2004 was due
primarily to the businesses increasing their IT spending in a generally improving economy and the
completion of the IT system conversion in the first quarter of 2004, which allowed a renewed focus
on clients. In 2004, the growth rates were stronger in sales to large enterprise and public sector
clients compared to SMB clients. Insight North America had 1,106 account executives at December
31, 2004 compared with 1,194 at December 31, 2003. The decrease in account executives was due to
planned headcount reductions, based on performance, in order to reduce costs and increase the
productivity of the remaining account executives.
Insight UKs net sales increased 19% to $451.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $379.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Increases in the British pound sterling
exchange rates accounted for $50.2 million of this increase. In British pound sterling, net sales
increased 6% compared to 2003. The increase in net sales for 2004 compared to 2003 was due
primarily to increasing productivity of account executives and increases in sales and demand from
SMB and public sector clients. Insight UK had 298 account executives at December 31, 2004 compared
to 232 at December 31, 2003. The increase is due to the addition of account executives during the
year ended December 31, 2004, offset by planned headcount reductions, based on performance.
35
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Net sales by product category for Insight North America and Insight UK were as follows
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight North America
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Percentage of Product
|
|
Percentage of Product
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
Product Categories
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Computers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notebooks and PDAs
|
|
16%
|
|
15%
|
|
18%
|
|
18%
|
Desktops and Servers
|
|
18%
|
|
18%
|
|
13%
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
33%
|
|
31%
|
|
31%
|
Software
|
|
12%
|
|
11%
|
|
15%
|
|
16%
|
Network and Connectivity
|
|
11%
|
|
10%
|
|
8%
|
|
8%
|
Printers
|
|
9%
|
|
12%
|
|
10%
|
|
10%
|
Storage Devices
|
|
7%
|
|
8%
|
|
7%
|
|
6%
|
Monitors and Video
|
|
7%
|
|
8%
|
|
11%
|
|
9%
|
Supplies and Accessories
|
|
7%
|
|
5%
|
|
8%
|
|
10%
|
Memory and Processors
|
|
6%
|
|
5%
|
|
4%
|
|
3%
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
7%
|
|
8%
|
|
6%
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
In 2004, the largest product category was computers, representing 34% of product net sales for
Insight North America and 31% of product net sales for Insight UK. Overall, the product mix in
2004 was relatively consistent with sales in 2003. In 2004, growth in desktops, servers and
monitors was fueled by businesses initiating refresh cycles of their IT products. Growth in
notebooks and PDAs and network and connectivity in 2004 was strong as businesses continued to focus
on increasing the mobility of their workforces. Printers as a percentage of net sales in Insight
North America declined due primarily to decreases in average selling prices and new competitors in
the market place. All other product categories in 2004, as a percentage of product net sales, were
fairly consistent with 2003.
Direct Alliances net sales of $74.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 were down 3%
compared to $76.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net sales declined in 2004 due
primarily to the wind-down of one client relationship that ended, as scheduled, in May 2003. This
client represented approximately 3% of Direct Alliances net sales for the year ended December 31,
2003, offset partially by an increase in pass-through product sales. Direct Alliances net sales
are concentrated with a few manufacturers of IT products. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
Direct Alliances largest outsourcing client, IBM, accounted for 60% of Direct Alliances net sales
compared to 65% for the year ended December 31, 2003. For the year ended December 31, 2004, Direct
Alliances top three outsourcing clients accounted for approximately 88% of Direct Alliances net
sales compared to 90% for the year ended December 31, 2003. In certain of Direct Alliance client
contracts, there are provisions that provide for payments to Direct Alliance by its clients of the
higher of the fees as calculated or a specified guaranteed service fee amount. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, this fee was $162,000 compared with $461,000 for the year ended December 31,
2003. The decrease in this fee is related to decreased performance fees related to a renegotiated
fee structure as part of multi-year contract renewal with Direct Alliances largest client.
Gross Profit.
Gross profit increased 9% to $370.4 million in 2004 from $339.5 million in
2003. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased from 11.8% for the year ended December
31, 2003 to 12.0% for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our gross profit and gross profit as a
percent of net sales by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Sales
|
Insight North America
|
|
$
|
289,604
|
|
|
11.3%
|
|
$
|
267,320
|
|
|
11.0%
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
61,594
|
|
|
13.7%
|
|
|
50,797
|
|
|
13.4%
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
19,233
|
|
|
25.9%
|
|
|
21,344
|
|
|
28.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
370,431
|
|
|
12.0%
|
|
$
|
339,461
|
|
|
11.8%
|
Insight North Americas gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2004 by 8% to
$289.6 million from $267.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of net
sales, gross profit increased from 11.0% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 11.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2004. Product gross margin in 2004 was
36
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
consistent with 2003 as internal initiatives to increase gross margin were successful but were
offset by the increase in sales to large enterprise clients, which are typically at lower product
margins. The overall increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales in 2004 was the result
of a surge in referral fees from Microsoft for enterprise agreements, decreases in the write-downs
of inventories due to enhanced inventory management policies and procedures, and increases in
supplier reimbursements as a percentage of sales. These increases were offset partially by
decreases in the gross margin from sales of services.
Insight UKs gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2004 by 21% to $61.6
million from $50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit increased from 13.4% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 13.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The overall increase was the result of increases in gross margin from sales of
services, supplier discounts and freight margin and decreases in the write-downs of inventories due
to enhanced inventory management policies and procedures. These increases were offset partially by
a decrease in supplier reimbursements and an increase in the percentage of sales to public sector
clients, which are typically at lower gross margins.
Direct Alliances gross profit decreased for the year ended December 31, 2004 to $19.2 million
from $21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of net sales, gross
profit decreased from 28.0% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 25.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The overall decrease was due primarily to renegotiated fee structures as part
of multi-year contract renewals with two of Direct Alliances largest clients in 2004 and the
wind-down of one client relationship that ended, as scheduled, in May 2003.
Operating Expenses.
Selling and Administrative Expenses.
Selling and administrative expenses increased 2%, to
$285.7 million in 2004 from $279.5 million in 2003, but decreased as a percent of net sales to 9.3%
in 2004 from 9.7% in 2003. Selling and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales by
operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Sales
|
Insight North America
|
|
$
|
225,956
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
228,129
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
53,454
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
45,853
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,557
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
285,742
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
279,539
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Insight North Americas selling and administrative expenses decreased for the year ended
December 31, 2004 by 1% to $226.0 million from $228.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased from 9.4% for the year
ended December 31, 2003 to 8.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The overall decrease was
primarily due to cost savings from completing the system conversion which eliminated accelerated
depreciation of $6.8 million on the old IT system, stay bonuses and redundant personnel. Also
contributing to the decrease was an increase in net sales in 2004, reductions in bad debt expense
and a continued focus on cost controls, which resulted in some headcount reductions. These
decreases were partially offset by $1.2 million of expenses associated with the hiring of our chief
executive officer and increased investments in 2004 on marketing and business development.
Insight UKs selling and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31,
2004 by 17% to $53.5 million from $45.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a
percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased from 12.1% for the year
ended December 31, 2003 to 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease as a
percentage of sales was due primarily to reduced bad debt expense and increases in supplier
reimbursements that are specifically offset against marketing expenditures. These decreases were
offset partially by increases in personnel costs related to recruitment and headcount increases.
Additionally, in the year ended December 31, 2004, Insight UK recorded bonus expenses of $3.2
million, including employer taxes, related to a management incentive plan with the top executives
at a discontinued operation. The management incentive plan compensated them, as a group, with an
equivalent to approximately 12.5% of the gain, after certain adjustments, related to our sales of
the discontinued operation.
Direct Alliances selling and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December
31, 2004 by 14% to $6.3 million from $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a
percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased from 7.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2003 to 8.5% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The overall increase was due
primarily to the loss of reimbursement of operating expenses from the client whose program ended in
May 2003 as well as increased expenses related to new business development efforts in 2004.
37
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Severance and Restructuring Expenses.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, Insight North
America, Insight UK and Direct Alliance recorded $2.0 million, $377,000 and $83,000, respectively,
of severance and restructuring expenses attributable to the elimination of certain sales, support
and management functions. These amounts included $1.6 million recorded in connection with the
retirement of our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and
Secretary. During the year ended December 31, 2003, Insight North America recorded $2.9 million in
restructuring expenses associated with costs incurred to close Insight North Americas distribution
facility in Indiana and severance associated with the elimination of certain support and management
positions. We closed the Indiana facility in order to consolidate warehouse and distribution
facilities in Illinois, in accordance with an acquisition integration plan. These restructuring
expenses primarily represented costs associated with terminated teammates, abandoned assets and
remaining lease obligations. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2003, Insight UK recorded
$543,000 of restructuring expenses relating to severance associated with the elimination of service
technicians and certain support and management functions. See further discussion in Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
Reductions in Liabilities Assumed in Previous Acquisitions.
During the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003, Insight UK settled certain liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition for
$3.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, less than the amounts originally recorded. The tax
expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004 related to this income was only $272,000
due to the release of the valuation allowance on the related deferred tax asset. The income
resulting from the reductions in liabilities assumed in previous acquisitions during the year ended
December 31, 2003 was not taxable. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8
of this report for further discussion.
Interest Income.
Interest income of $1.8 million and $833,000 for the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was generated through short-term investments. The increase in
interest income is due to increases in the amount of cash invested in short-term investments and
increases in interest rates earned on those investments during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense of $2.0 million and $2.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, primarily related to borrowings under our financing
facilities. The decrease in interest expense was due to a reduction in the amounts outstanding
under our interest-bearing financing facilities offset by increases in interest rates during the
year ended December 31, 2004.
Other Expenses, Net.
Other expenses, net, decreased to $893,000 for the year ended December
31, 2004 from $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and consisted primarily of bank
fees associated with our financing facilities and cash management, miscellaneous investment gains
or losses and foreign currency transaction gains or losses. The decrease was due primarily to
income from two separate gains on investments that occurred during the year ended December 31,
2004. In 2004, we recorded gains from Insight UKs sale of a building of $328,000 and Direct
Alliances sale of stock upon exercise of stock options that were received from a client several
years ago as compensation for a note payable extension of $516,000. For the year ended December
31, 2004, we also recorded non-operating expenses of $400,000 representing the write-down of an
equity method investment. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
report for further discussion.
Income Tax Expense
.
Our effective tax rates applicable to continuing operations for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were 29.2% and 34.6%, respectively. Tax expense for the year
ended December 31, 2004 was reduced due primarily to a $5.5 million tax benefit recorded as a
result of a decrease in the deferred tax valuation allowance for our United Kingdom operations and
income resulting from the reduction of certain Insight UK liabilities assumed in connection with a
previous acquisition not being taxable. These decreases were partially offset by increases in the
percentage of taxable income in the United States, which is taxed at higher rates, and increases in
non-deductible expenses.
Earnings from Discontinued Operation.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we sold our
entire investment in PlusNet. Accordingly, the results of operations attributable to PlusNet are
disclosed as a discontinued operation. The following amounts for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 represent PlusNets results of operations that we consolidated through July 14, 2004 (the
date we reduced our ownership in PlusNet from 95% to 45%), amounts we reported as income from
equity method investee, included in other income, from July 15, 2004 through December 14, 2004 (the
date
we sold our remaining investment), and the gain on the sales of our shares of PlusNet. The
following amounts have been segregated from continuing operations and reflected as discontinued
operation (in thousands):
38
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
23,161
|
|
|
$
|
28,305
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
15,892
|
|
|
|
18,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,269
|
|
|
|
9,882
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
6,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Gain on sale of investment in PlusNet
|
|
|
(23,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(984
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before income taxes
|
|
|
27,194
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
20,441
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report for further
discussion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth for the period presented certain consolidated cash flow
information for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,726
|
|
|
$
|
13,309
|
|
|
$
|
60,903
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(12,269
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
(25,317
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
(12,204
|
)
|
|
|
(27,974
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow
|
|
|
(5,695
|
)
|
|
|
(3,461
|
)
|
|
|
3,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(3,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,967
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
38,443
|
|
|
$
|
41,897
|
|
|
$
|
30,930
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
35,145
|
|
|
$
|
38,443
|
|
|
$
|
41,897
|
|
Cash and Cash Flow
Our cash balances are held in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with the
majority in the United Kingdom. We intend to hold cash balances in the United Kingdom for future
growth and investments and to meet any liquidity requirements in the United States through ongoing
cash flows, external borrowings or both. However, we decided to repay intercompany balances owed
by our Canadian operation to certain of our United States operations, primarily for charges of
management fees, interest and other expenses, to preserve the deductibility of these expenses for
Canadian tax purposes and to provide additional cash for uses in the United States such as working
capital, debt repayment and repurchases of our common stock. Certain intercompany balances were
paid in December 2005 and January 2006, and ongoing charges will be paid on a monthly basis.
As noted in Note 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report, in October
2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Staff Position No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(FSP No. 109-2), which provides guidance under FASB Statement
No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109) with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on
an enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability. FSP No. 109-2 states that an
enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the
effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for
purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. We have completed our evaluation of the impact of the
repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act and have elected not to utilize these provisions to
repatriate the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to our operations in the United
States.
Our primary uses of cash in the past few years have been to fund our working capital
requirements, capital expenditures, repurchases of our common stock and acquisitions.
39
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
In 2004, we sold our entire investment in a discontinued operation. Excluding net earnings,
amounts related to the discontinued operation have not been removed from the 2004 and 2003 cash
flow statements because the effect is immaterial.
Net cash provided by operating activities.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash
provided by operating activities was $12.7 million, a 4% decrease from cash flows from operations
of $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 primarily due to higher net earnings before
depreciation in 2004. Cash flows from operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 resulted
primarily from net earnings before depreciation, offset by increases in accounts receivable and
inventories. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to increased sales and
increases in sales with terms longer than 30 days. The increase in inventories was due primarily
to opportunistic purchases and increased inventories for our integration labs and upcoming projects
with large enterprise and public sector clients. Additionally, we decreased the outstanding
balance on our inventories financing facility. Cash flows from operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 resulted primarily from net earnings before depreciation and the gain on the sale
of our investment in a discontinued operation, offset by an increase in accounts receivable and
inventories due primarily to increased sales compared to the prior year.
Our consolidated cash flow operating metrics for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Days sales outstanding in ending accounts receivable (DSOs)
|
|
53
|
|
52
|
|
48
|
Inventory turns (excluding inventories not available for sale)
|
|
26
|
|
29
|
|
30
|
Days purchases outstanding in ending accounts payable (DPOs)
|
|
24
|
|
29
|
|
30
|
The increase in DSOs is due primarily to an increase in net sales with terms longer than 30
days, primarily related to our large enterprise and public sector clients. The decrease in
inventory turns is primarily due to the increase in inventories primarily related to opportunistic
purchases and increased inventories for our integration labs and upcoming projects with large
enterprise and public sector clients. The $35.5 million of inventories not available for sale at
December 31, 2005 represents inventories segregated pursuant to binding client contracts, which
will be recorded as net sales when the criteria for sales recognition are met. Client payments in
advance of shipment of $24.7 million at December 31, 2005 primarily represent payments received
from clients pursuant to these contracts. The decrease in DPOs is due primarily to utilizing early
pay discounts from suppliers and to the timing of payments at year end.
If sales continue to increase in the future, we expect that cash flow from operations will be
used, at least partially, to fund working capital as we typically increase balances in our
inventories and pay our suppliers on average terms that are shorter than the average terms granted
to our clients in order to take advantage of supplier discounts.
Net cash used in investing activities.
In January 2005, we received $27.0 million owed to us
by an underwriter related to the sale of a discontinued operation. Capital expenditures of $38.8
million for the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily relate to capitalized costs of software
developed for internal use, the purchase of a previously leased office facility, leasehold
improvements primarily in our Illinois distribution center and in Insight UKs London facility and
computer equipment. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2004 of $20.7 million
primarily related to software, computer equipment and capitalized costs of software developed for
internal use. Capital expenditures in 2004 were offset by proceeds from the sale of a discontinued
operation and proceeds from the sale of a building. See Note 18 to Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this report for further discussion about our discontinued operation. We
expect total capital expenditures in 2006 to be between $30.0 million and $35.0 million.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.
During the year ended December 31, 2005,
cash was provided by borrowings on our short-term financing facility and our line of credit and by
cash received from common stock issuances as a result of stock option exercises. Cash was
primarily used to make repayments on our short-term financing facility and to repurchase shares of
our common stock. In January 2006, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that
allows us to purchase up to an additional $50.0 million of our common stock.
We anticipate that cash flow from operations, together with the funds available under our
financing facilities, will be adequate to support our presently anticipated cash and working
capital requirements for operations through 2006 and longer if we successfully renew our short-term
finance facility at or prior to the expiration of its current term on December 30, 2006. We have
no reason to believe the facility will not be renewed at the end of its current term.
As part of our long-term growth strategy, we intend to consider acquisition opportunities from
time to time, which may require additional debt or equity financing.
40
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
See Note 5 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report for a description
of our financing facilities, including terms, amounts outstanding, amounts available and weighted
average borrowings and interest rates during the year.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, which include guaranties and
indemnifications, as defined by the SECs Final Rule 67,
Disclosure in Managements Discussion and
Analysis about Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
. The
guaranties and indemnifications are discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in Item 8 of this report. We believe that none of our off-balance sheet arrangements have, or is
reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition, sales or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Contractual Obligations for Continuing Operations
At December 31, 2005, our contractual obligations for continuing operations were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More than 5
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Short-term debt (a)
|
|
$
|
49,281
|
|
|
$
|
49,281
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term debt (b)
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
44,384
|
|
|
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
10,072
|
|
|
|
9,134
|
|
|
|
19,182
|
|
Severance and restructuring
obligations (c)
|
|
|
7,507
|
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
4,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contractual obligations (d)
|
|
|
25,640
|
|
|
|
3,895
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
|
12,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
148,121
|
|
|
$
|
83,449
|
|
|
$
|
19,111
|
|
|
$
|
13,784
|
|
|
$
|
31,777
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the accounts receivable securitization facility that expires December 30, 2006
and secured inventory financing facility that expires March 31, 2006.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes the line of credit facility which expires December 31, 2008.
|
|
(c)
|
|
As a result of approved severance and restructuring plans, we expect future cash
expenditures related to employee termination benefits and facilities based costs. See
further discussion in Notes 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
report.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Includes:
|
|
I.
|
|
Estimated interest payments in 2006 of $1.8 million based on the
projected monthly balances under the asset backed securitization facility and using
the December 31, 2005 interest rate of 4.8% per annum.
|
|
|
II.
|
|
Amounts totaling $9.6 million over the next 8 years to the Valley of the
Sun Bowl Foundation for sponsorship of the Insight Bowl and $11.0 million over the
next 10 years for advertising and marketing events at the new stadium where the
Arizona Cardinals are scheduled to play their National Football League games
beginning in 2006.
|
|
|
III.
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2005, we recorded $979,000,
$649,000 net of taxes, for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
for the adoption of FIN No. 47. FIN No. 47 states that companies must recognize a
liability for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform asset-retirement
activities that are conditional on a future event if the amount can be reasonably
estimated. This interpretation applies to certain provisions in our facility lease
agreements in the United States and the United Kingdom. Some of our leases
stipulate that any leasehold improvements performed by the tenant with landlord
approval become the landlords property upon expiration of the lease. However, some
landlords further reserve the right to make the determination as to whether the
premises must be returned to their original condition, normal wear and tear
excepted, at our expense. Because of these provisions, FIN No. 47 now requires us
to record a liability for the estimated fair value of this legal obligation to
return the premises to the original condition with the offset recorded as an
increase to the cost of the leasehold improvements. We estimate that we will owe
$3.2 million in future years in connection with returning our leased facilities to
original condition.
|
See further discussion in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
report.
Although we set purchase targets with our suppliers tied to the amount of supplier
reimbursements we receive, we have no material contractual purchase obligations.
41
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Acquisitions
Our strategy includes the possible acquisition of other businesses to expand or complement our
operations. The magnitude, timing and nature of any future acquisitions will depend on a number of
factors, including the availability of suitable acquisition candidates, the negotiation of
acceptable terms, our financial capabilities and general economic and business conditions.
Financing of future acquisitions would result in the utilization of cash, incurrence of additional
debt, issuance of stock or a combination of any of the three.
Inflation
We have historically not been adversely affected by inflation, as technological advances and
competition within the IT industry have generally caused the prices of the products we sell to
decline and product life cycles tend to be short. This requires our growth in unit sales to exceed
the decline in prices in order to increase our net sales. We believe that most price increases
could be passed on to our clients, as prices charged by us are not set by long-term contracts;
however, as a result of competitive pressure, there can be no assurance that the full effect of any
such price increases could be passed on to our clients.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report of this report
for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including our expected dates of adoption and
the estimated effects on our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We have interest rate exposure arising from our financing facilities, which have variable
interest rates. These variable interest rates are affected by changes in short-term interest
rates. We manage interest rate exposure by maintaining a conservative debt to equity ratio.
We believe that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows will not be material. Our
financing facilities expose net earnings to changes in short-term interest rates since interest
rates on the underlying obligations are variable. Borrowings outstanding under the
interest-bearing financing facilities totaled $66.3 million at December 31, 2005, and the interest
rates attributable to this outstanding balance were 4.8% and 7.25% per annum at December 31, 2005.
A change in net earnings resulting from a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates
would not be material.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our revenue, expense, and capital purchasing activities are primarily transacted in U.S.
dollars. However, since a portion of our business is operated in the United Kingdom and Canada in
their respective functional currencies, we do have foreign currency translation exposure for
changes in exchange rates for the Canadian dollar and the British pound sterling. Additionally,
our U.S. operation outsources one of its call centers to our Canadian operations for a monthly
charge, which creates some foreign currency transaction exposure. Accordingly, changes in exchange
rates, and in particular a strengthening of the U.S. dollar, may adversely affect our consolidated
financial statements as expressed in U.S. dollars. We monitor our foreign currency exposure and
may from time to time enter into hedging transactions to manage this exposure. There were no
hedging transactions during the year ended December 31, 2005, and there were no hedging instruments
outstanding at December 31, 2005.
42
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Insight Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission, and our report dated February 16, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements
assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Financial Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations
, as of December 31, 2005. The net effect of the recognition of conditional
asset retirement obligations was recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle.
Phoenix, Arizona
February 16, 2006
44
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Insight Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; 2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and 3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in our
opinion, Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated February 16, 2006 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Phoenix, Arizona
February 16, 2006
45
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
35,145
|
|
|
$
|
38,443
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
480,458
|
|
|
|
447,907
|
|
Receivable from underwriter on sale of discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,024
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
121,223
|
|
|
|
95,903
|
|
Inventories not available for sale
|
|
|
35,528
|
|
|
|
41,791
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other current assets
|
|
|
29,624
|
|
|
|
35,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
701,978
|
|
|
|
687,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
133,017
|
|
|
|
113,079
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
87,124
|
|
|
|
86,907
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
922,340
|
|
|
$
|
887,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
183,014
|
|
|
|
198,322
|
|
Inventories financing facility
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
17,554
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
55,413
|
|
|
|
59,110
|
|
Client payments in advance of shipment
|
|
|
24,747
|
|
|
|
16,270
|
|
Short-term financing facility
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
312,455
|
|
|
|
316,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes and long-term liabilities
|
|
|
22,552
|
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,316
|
|
|
|
328,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6, 7, 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 3,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 47,736 and 49,403
shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
299,043
|
|
|
|
301,580
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
252,318
|
|
|
|
230,879
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
14,186
|
|
|
|
26,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
566,024
|
|
|
|
559,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
922,340
|
|
|
$
|
887,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,261,150
|
|
|
$
|
3,082,725
|
|
|
$
|
2,886,047
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
2,869,239
|
|
|
|
2,712,294
|
|
|
|
2,546,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
391,911
|
|
|
|
370,431
|
|
|
|
339,461
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
289,250
|
|
|
|
285,742
|
|
|
|
279,539
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
|
12,967
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
3,465
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
(2,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
90,358
|
|
|
|
85,871
|
|
|
|
58,961
|
|
Non-operating (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3,394
|
)
|
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
90,985
|
|
|
|
84,816
|
|
|
|
54,714
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
35,641
|
|
|
|
24,729
|
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
55,344
|
|
|
|
60,087
|
|
|
|
35,762
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operation, net of taxes of $0,
$6,753, and $858, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,441
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
55,344
|
|
|
|
80,528
|
|
|
|
37,754
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes of
$330 in 2005
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
$
|
80,528
|
|
|
$
|
37,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
48,553
|
|
|
|
48,389
|
|
|
|
46,315
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
49,042
|
|
|
|
49,231
|
|
|
|
46,885
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
46,073
|
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
252,624
|
|
|
$
|
9,609
|
|
|
$
|
112,597
|
|
|
$
|
375,291
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,398
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on
stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,135
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,754
|
|
|
|
37,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
47,116
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,803
|
|
|
|
21,744
|
|
|
|
150,351
|
|
|
|
439,369
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,645
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on
stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
Reduction in foreign currency
translation adjustment due
to sale
of investment in discontinued
operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,528
|
|
|
|
80,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
49,403
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,580
|
|
|
|
26,606
|
|
|
|
230,879
|
|
|
|
559,559
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on
stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
Repurchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,726
|
)
|
|
|
(49,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,998
|
)
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,726
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
49,998
|
|
|
|
(16,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,420
|
)
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,695
|
|
|
|
54,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
47,736
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
299,043
|
|
|
$
|
14,186
|
|
|
$
|
252,318
|
|
|
$
|
566,024
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
$
|
60,087
|
|
|
$
|
35,762
|
|
Plus: net earnings from discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,441
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
54,695
|
|
|
|
80,528
|
|
|
|
37,754
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18,204
|
|
|
|
20,357
|
|
|
|
30,372
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
|
|
|
5,292
|
|
|
|
5,606
|
|
|
|
8,424
|
|
Write-downs of inventories
|
|
|
7,625
|
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
|
8,918
|
|
Non-cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on stock based compensation
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
(2,390
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(42,928
|
)
|
|
|
(65,666
|
)
|
|
|
19,432
|
|
Increase in receivables from equity method investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in inventories
|
|
|
(27,583
|
)
|
|
|
(32,842
|
)
|
|
|
(26,008
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other current assets
|
|
|
6,879
|
|
|
|
(668
|
)
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(1,802
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
(4,078
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
(9,308
|
)
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
|
(41,026
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in inventories financing facility
|
|
|
(13,256
|
)
|
|
|
11,957
|
|
|
|
5,597
|
|
Increase in client payments in advance of shipment
|
|
|
8,555
|
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
11,293
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,237
|
)
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
12,726
|
|
|
|
13,309
|
|
|
|
60,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash receipt of underwriter receivable
|
|
|
26,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(38,809
|
)
|
|
|
(20,705
|
)
|
|
|
(25,317
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation, net of direct expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in equity method investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(12,269
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
(25,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on short-term financing facility
|
|
|
(55,000
|
)
|
|
|
(125,000
|
)
|
|
|
(140,000
|
)
|
Borrowings on short-term financing facility
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) on line of credit
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
(10,004
|
)
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(49,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayment of) borrowing on long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(13,172
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock plans
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
|
|
27,645
|
|
|
|
11,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
(12,204
|
)
|
|
|
(27,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow
|
|
|
(5,695
|
)
|
|
|
(3,461
|
)
|
|
|
3,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,298
|
)
|
|
|
(3,454
|
)
|
|
|
10,967
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
38,443
|
|
|
|
41,897
|
|
|
|
30,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
35,145
|
|
|
$
|
38,443
|
|
|
$
|
41,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest
|
|
$
|
1,617
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
|
|
$
|
20,600
|
|
|
$
|
23,275
|
|
|
$
|
31,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvement related to conditional asset retirement obligation
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable from underwriter from sale of discontinued operation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,849
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
49
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
We are a leading provider of information technology (IT) products and services to businesses
in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Our offerings include brand name computing
products, IT services and outsourcing of business processes. As of December 31, 2005, we were
organized in the following three operating segments:
|
|
|
Provider of IT products and services North America (Insight North America);
|
|
|
|
|
Provider of IT products and services United Kingdom (Insight UK); and
|
|
|
|
|
Business process outsourcing provider (Direct Alliance).
|
For a business overview, as well as discussions about the operating strategy, growth strategy,
industry and competition related to each of our operating segments, see Business Operating
Segments, in Item 1 of this report.
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. References to the Company, we, us, our and other similar
words refer to Insight Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context
suggests otherwise.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, these
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities at the date of purchase of
three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our cash balances are held in the United States,
Canada and the United Kingdom, with the majority in the United Kingdom.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure trade receivables are not overstated
due to uncollectibility. The allowance is determined using estimated losses on accounts receivable
based on historical write-offs, evaluation of the aging of the receivables and the current economic
environment. We write-off individual accounts against the reserve when we become aware of a
customers inability to meet its financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings,
or deterioration in the customers operating results or financial position.
Inventories
We state inventories, principally purchased computers, hardware and software, at the lower of
weighted average cost (which approximates cost under the first-in first-out method) or market. We
evaluate inventories for excess, obsolescence or other factors that may render inventories
unmarketable at normal margins. Write-downs are recorded so that inventories reflect the
approximate net realizable value and take into account our contractual provisions with suppliers
governing price protection, stock rotation and return privileges relating to obsolescence.
Inventories not available for sale relate to product sales transactions in which we are
warehousing the product and will be deploying the product to clients designated locations.
Additionally, we may perform services on a portion of the product prior to shipment to our clients
and will be paid a fee for doing so. Although the product contracts are non-cancelable with
customary credit terms beginning the date the inventories were segregated in our warehouse and
invoiced to the client, and the warranty periods begin on the date of invoice, these transactions
do not generally meet the sales recognition criteria under GAAP. Therefore, we have not recorded
sales and the inventories are classified as inventories not available for sale on our
balance sheet until the product is shipped. If clients remit payment before we ship product to
them, we record the payments received as client payments in advance of shipment on our
consolidated balance sheet.
50
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Property and Equipment
We state property and equipment at cost. We state equipment under capital leases at the
present value of the minimum lease payments. We capitalize major improvements and betterments,
while maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are expensed as incurred. Depreciation or
amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated economic lives
of the assets:
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Shorter of underlying lease term or asset life
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7 years
|
Equipment
|
|
3-5 years
|
Buildings
|
|
29 years
|
Software
|
|
3-10 years
|
External direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal
use computer software and payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly
associated with and who devote time to an internal use computer software projects, to the extent of
the time spent directly on the project are capitalized.
Reviews are regularly performed to determine whether facts and circumstances exist which
indicate that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or the carrying amount of assets
may not be recoverable. When an indication exists, we assess the recoverability of our assets by
comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of
assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any,
is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value of those assets.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the estimated
fair value of net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. We perform an annual review
in the fourth quarter of every year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment
exist, to determine if the carrying value of recorded goodwill is impaired. The impairment review
process compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which goodwill resides to its carrying
value.
Self Insurance
We are self-insured for medical insurance benefits up to certain stop-loss limits. Such costs
are estimated and accrued based on our maximum liability under the stop-loss limits, which
estimates both known and incurred but not reported claims.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of the subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at the
exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet dates. Income and expense items are translated at the
average exchange rate for each month within the year. The resulting translation adjustments are
recorded directly in other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders equity.
For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the net foreign currency translation adjustments
were ($12,420,000) and $4,862,000. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the adjustment is due
primarily to the strengthening of the United States dollar against the British pound sterling. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, the adjustment was due primarily to the weakening of the United
States dollar against the British pound sterling and, to a lesser extent, the Canadian dollar. The
2004 foreign currency translation adjustment includes a decrease of $1,596,000 related to the sale
of a discontinued operation, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 37
Accounting for Translation Adjustments upon Sale of Part of an Investment in
a Foreign Entity.
The 2005 foreign currency translation adjustment includes $2,579,000 of taxes.
All transaction gains and losses are reported in other income (expense). These gains or losses
were not material in any of the years presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Sales Recognition
We adhere to guidelines and principles of sales recognition described in Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition
(SAB 104), issued by the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). Under SAB 104, sales are recognized when the title and risk of
loss are passed to the client, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale, delivery
has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed and determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Using these tests, the vast majority of our sales represent
product sales recognized upon shipment. Usual sales terms are FOB shipping point, at which time
title and risk of loss has passed to the client and delivery has occurred. We make provisions for
estimated product returns that we expect to occur under our return policy based upon historical
return rates.
51
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
From time to time, in the sale of products and services, we may enter into contracts that
contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. Sales of services currently
represent a small percentage of our net sales, and a significant amount of services that are
performed in conjunction with product sales are completed in our facilities prior to shipment of
the product. In these circumstances, net sales for both the product and services are recognized
upon shipment. Net sales of services that are performed at client locations are often service-only
contracts and are recorded as sales when the services are performed. If the service is performed
at a client location in conjunction with a product sale or other service sale, we recognize net
sales in accordance with SAB 104 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 00-21
Accounting for
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.
Accordingly, we recognize sales for delivered
items only when all of the following criteria are satisfied:
|
|
|
the delivered item(s) has value to the client on a stand-alone basis;
|
|
|
|
|
there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and
|
|
|
|
|
if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item,
delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially
in our control.
|
Insight North America and Insight UK sell certain third-party service contracts and software
assurance or subscription products for which we are not the primary obligor. These sales do not
meet the criteria for gross sales recognition as defined in SAB 104 and EITF 99-19 and thus are
recorded on a net sales recognition basis. As we enter into contracts with third-party service
providers or vendors, we evaluate whether the subsequent sales of such services should be recorded
as gross sales or net sales in accordance with the sales recognition criteria outlined in SAB 104
and EITF 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent.
We must determine
whether we act as a principal in the transaction and assume the risks and rewards of ownership or
if we are simply acting as an agent or broker. Under gross sales recognition, the entire selling
price is recorded in sales and our cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded
in costs of goods sold. Under net sales recognition, the cost to the third-party service provider
or vendor is recorded as a reduction to sales resulting in net sales equal to the gross profit on
the transaction and there are no costs of goods sold.
Direct Alliances outsourcing arrangements are primarily service fee based whereby net sales
are based primarily upon a cost plus arrangement and a percentage of the sales price from products
sold. These sales are recorded under the net sales recognition method. Also, as an accommodation
to select clients, Direct Alliance purchases product from suppliers and immediately resells the
product to clients for ultimate resale to the clients customer. These product sales (referred to
as pass-through product sales) to our clients are transacted at little or no gross margin and the
selling price to our client is recorded in net sales with the cost payable to the supplier recorded
in cost of goods sold.
Vendor Consideration
We receive payments and credits from vendors, including consideration pursuant to volume sales
incentive programs, volume purchase incentive programs and shared marketing expense programs.
Vendor consideration received pursuant to volume sales incentive programs is recognized as a
reduction to costs of goods sold. Vendor consideration received pursuant to volume purchase
incentive programs is allocated to inventories based on the applicable incentives from each vendor
and is recorded in cost of goods sold as the inventory is sold. Vendor consideration received
pursuant to shared marketing expense programs is recorded as a reduction of the related selling and
administrative expenses in the period the program takes place only if the consideration represents
a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs. Consideration that exceeds the
specific, incremental, identifiable costs is classified as a reduction of costs of goods sold or
inventory. The amount of vendor consideration recorded as a reduction of selling, general and
administrative expenses totaled $9,630,000, $7,478,000 and $2,623,000 for the years ended December
31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as they are incurred. Advertising expense of $18,839,000,
$15,364,000 and $8,210,000 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. These amounts were partially offset by vendor consideration received pursuant to
shared marketing expense programs recorded as a reduction of selling and administrative expenses,
as discussed above.
Shipping and Handling
We record freight billed to our clients as net sales and the related freight costs as costs of
goods sold.
52
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable earnings in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the
enactment date.
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
We adopted FASB Financial Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations
(FIN No. 47) during the year ended December 31, 2005. FIN No. 47 states that
companies must recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform
asset-retirement activities that are conditional on a future event if the amount can be reasonably
estimated. This interpretation applies to certain provisions in our facility lease agreements in
the United States and the United Kingdom. Some of our leases stipulate that any leasehold
improvements performed by us with landlord approval become the landlords property upon expiration
of the lease. However, some of our landlords further reserve the right to make the determination
as to whether the premises must be returned to their original condition, normal wear and tear
excepted, at our expense. Because of these provisions, we are required to record a liability for
the estimated fair value of this legal obligation to return the premises to the original condition
with the offset recorded as an increase to the cost of the leasehold improvements. As a result,
during the fourth quarter of 2005, we recorded leasehold improvements of $1,310,000 and long term
liabilities of $2,289,000. Had the obligations been recorded at December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
balances would have been $1,625,000 and $1,470,000, respectively. Additionally, we recorded a
non-cash cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $979,000 ($649,000 net of tax),
representing cumulative amortization of the leasehold improvements and accretion of the long term
liability since the lease inception dates.
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if this
interpretation had been applied during the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Net earnings as reported
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
$
|
80,528
|
|
|
$
|
37,754
|
|
Total depreciation and
interest accretion costs, net
of tax
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$
|
54,555
|
|
|
$
|
80,413
|
|
|
$
|
37,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
53
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Net Earnings From Continuing Operations Per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net earnings from continuing operations available to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted
EPS includes the effect of stock options assumed to be exercised using the treasury stock method.
A reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations follows (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
55,344
|
|
|
$
|
60,087
|
|
|
$
|
35,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic EPS
|
|
|
48,553
|
|
|
|
48,389
|
|
|
|
46,315
|
|
Potential dilutive common shares due to dilutive stock
options, net of tax effect
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted EPS
|
|
|
49,042
|
|
|
|
49,231
|
|
|
|
46,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average outstanding stock options having no dilutive
effect
|
|
$
|
3,938
|
|
|
$
|
4,552
|
|
|
$
|
3,162
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
For 2005, we applied the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB No. 25) and
related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44,
Accounting for Certain Transactions
involving Stock Compensation an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25
, to account for our fixed
plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only
if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. FASB Statement No.
123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123) established accounting and
disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, we have elected to continue to apply the intrinsic
value-based method of accounting described above and have adopted the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, we do not currently recognize compensation expense for any of our stock
option plans because we do not issue options at exercise prices below the market value at date of
grant. Pro forma expense is recognized in our disclosures using the accelerated vesting
methodology of FASB Interpretation No. 28
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other
Variable Stock Option or Award Plans
.
We have issued shares and units of restricted common stock as incentives to certain officers
and employees and plan to do so in the future. We recognize compensation expense associated with
the issuance of shares and units of restricted stock over the vesting period for each respective
share and unit. The total compensation expense associated with restricted stock represents the
value based upon the number of shares or units awarded multiplied by the closing price on the date
of grant. Recipients of restricted stock shares are entitled to receive any dividends declared on
our common stock and have voting rights, regardless of whether such shares have vested. Recipients
of restricted stock units (RSUs) do not have voting or dividend rights until the vesting
conditions are satisfied and shares are released. At December 31, 2005, there were 122,500 shares
of restricted common stock and 7,500 RSUs outstanding. Compensation expense recognized for
stock-based employee compensation awards for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was
$766,000, $62,000 and $879,000, respectively.
54
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Had compensation cost for our stock-based plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123,
our net earnings and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated
below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Net earnings as reported
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
$
|
80,528
|
|
|
$
|
37,754
|
|
Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value-based
method for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
$
|
8,744
|
|
|
$
|
8,407
|
|
|
$
|
5,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$
|
45,951
|
|
|
$
|
72,121
|
|
|
$
|
32,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
For purposes of the SFAS No. 123 pro forma net earnings and net earnings per share calculation
in Note 1, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton (Black-Scholes) option-pricing model with the following quarterly
weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the Plans during the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
Expected
|
|
Risk-free
|
|
Expected
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
Volatility
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Lives (in years)
|
|
Granted
|
|
Quarters ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
0%
|
|
71%
|
|
4.0%
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
428,755
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
0%
|
|
69%
|
|
3.7%
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
1,230,165
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
0%
|
|
52%
|
|
4.1%
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
0%
|
|
43%
|
|
4.3%
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
5,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2004
|
|
0%
|
|
75%
|
|
1.8%
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
1,935,111
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
0%
|
|
74%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
66,065
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
0%
|
|
73%
|
|
2.8%
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
778,640
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
0%
|
|
72%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
561,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2003
|
|
0%
|
|
87%
|
|
1.9%
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
1,202,175
|
|
June 30, 2003
|
|
0%
|
|
81%
|
|
1.5%
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
749,618
|
|
September 30, 2003
|
|
0%
|
|
86%
|
|
1.8%
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
67,924
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
0%
|
|
79%
|
|
1.3%
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
212
|
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). We have elected to issue service-based and performance-based RSUs instead of
stock options in 2006. The number of RSUs ultimately awarded under the performance-based RSUs will
vary based on achievement of certain financial results. We will record compensation expense each
period based on our estimate of the most probable number of RSUs that will be issued under the
grants of performance-based RSUs. Additionally, the compensation expense will be reduced for our
estimate of forfeitures. Our 2006 equity compensation expense, which includes expense attributable
to RSU grants, as well as to vesting of stock options and restricted stock issued in prior years,
is estimated to be between $13,000,000 and $14,000,000. The actual amount will likely vary, either
higher or lower, based on achievement of 2006 financial results and stock price at grant date. The
expense range given assumes target financial results are reached.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 2004 and 2003 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified
to conform to the 2005 presentation.
55
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, which replaces SFAS No. 123 and supercedes
APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values
beginning with the first interim or annual period after June 15, 2005. The pro forma disclosures
previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement
recognition. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107, which provided
additional guidance in applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. In April 2005, the SEC amended
the compliance dates of SFAS No. 123R so that registrants will be required to implement the
standard as of the beginning of the first annual period that begins after June 15, 2005. We have
implemented this standard effective January 1, 2006. In the last quarter of 2005, the FASB
provided further guidance for the determination of grant dates and accounting for the tax effects
of share-based payment awards. Under SFAS No. 123R, we must determine the appropriate fair value
model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost
and the transition method to be used at date of adoption. SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits
of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash
flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as prescribed under current accounting rules. This
requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods
after adoption. Total cash flow will remain unchanged from cash flow as it would have been
reported under prior accounting rules. See further discussion of the effect of SFAS No. 123R
under Stock Based Compensation under
Significant Accounting Policies
above.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
(SFAS
No. 154) which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20
Accounting Changes
and SFAS
No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial StatementsAn Amendment of APB Opinion
No. 28
. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes
and error corrections. This statement establishes retrospective application, or the latest
practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the
reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
The European Union (EU) has enacted the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive
(the Directive), which makes producers of electrical goods, including computers and printers,
financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and
future covered products. The deadline for the individual member states of the EU to enact the
Directive in their respective countries was August 13, 2004 (such legislation, together with the
directive, the WEEE Legislation). Producers participating in the market are financially
responsible for implementing procedures to comply with the WEEE Legislation beginning in August
2005. All but a few of the 25 EU member countries have transposed the Directive into law; however,
the United Kingdom has delayed implementation of the Directive indefinitely. In June 2005, the
FASB issued FSP FAS 143-1,
Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste Obligations
(FSP 143-1),
which provides guidance on the accounting for certain obligations associated with the Directive.
FSP 143-1 is required to be applied to the later of the first reporting period ending after June 8,
2005 or the date of the Directives adoption into law by the applicable EU member countries. We
are continuing to evaluate the potential effect of the WEEE Legislation on our operations in the
United Kingdom. We do not currently believe the adoption of FSP 143-1 will have a material effect
on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
(2)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents are assumed to be the fair value because of
the liquidity of these instruments. The carrying amounts for accounts receivable, accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and our short-term financing facility
approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
(3)
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
7,591
|
|
|
$
|
5,488
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
5,750
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
29,602
|
|
|
|
27,990
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
34,128
|
|
|
|
31,264
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
65,215
|
|
|
|
60,760
|
|
Software
|
|
|
78,415
|
|
|
|
59,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,415
|
|
|
|
190,293
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(90,398
|
)
|
|
|
(77,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
133,017
|
|
|
$
|
113,079
|
|
56
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was
$18,204,000, $20,357,000 and $30,372,000, respectively.
Change in Accounting Estimate
In 2003, we accelerated the depreciation of certain software assets due to our decision to
implement a new IT system. We determined that the old IT system would no longer be used after
December 31, 2003, which shortened its estimated useful life and increased the depreciation for the
year ended December 31, 2003 by approximately $6,800,000.
(4)
Goodwill
All of our goodwill resides in our Insight North America operating segment and was affected
only by foreign currency translation adjustments related to goodwill in our Canadian operations.
Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit(s) that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the
business combination that resulted in the recording of goodwill. We have determined that our
reporting units are the same as our operating segments: Insight North America; Insight UK; and
Direct Alliance.
We perform an annual review in the fourth quarter of every year, or more frequently if
indicators of potential impairment exist, to determine if the carrying value of the recorded
goodwill is impaired. Events or circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition,
a loss of key personnel, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the
strategy for our overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, significant
declines in our stock price for a sustained period or significant underperformance relative to
expected historical or projected future results of operations. The impairment review process
compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which goodwill resides to its carrying value. In
testing for a potential impairment of goodwill, we first compare the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit with book value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds book
value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired and no additional steps are necessary. If,
however, the fair value of the reporting unit is less than book value, then we are required to
compare the carrying amount of the goodwill with its implied fair value. The estimate of implied
fair value of goodwill may require independent valuations of certain internally generated and
unrecognized intangible assets such as trademarks. If the carrying amount of our goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal
to the excess. The results of the 2005, 2004 and 2003 annual assessments indicated that goodwill
was not impaired.
(5)
Financing Facilities
Our financing facilities include a $200,000,000 accounts receivable securitization financing
facility, a $30,000,000 revolving line of credit and a $40,000,000 inventory financing facility.
We have an agreement to sell receivables periodically to a special purpose accounts receivable
and financing entity (the SPE), which is exclusively engaged in purchasing receivables from us.
The SPE is a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote entity that we have included in our consolidated
financial statements. The SPE funds its purchases by selling undivided interests in up to
$200,000,000 of eligible trade accounts receivable to a multi-seller conduit administered by an
independent financial institution. The sales to the conduit do not qualify for sale treatment
under SFAS No. 140
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment
of Liabilities
as we maintain effective control over the receivables that are sold. Accordingly,
the receivables remain recorded on our consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2005,
the SPE owned $405,910,000 of receivables recorded at fair value and included in our consolidated
balance sheet, of which $193,766,000 was eligible for funding. The financing facility expires
December 30, 2006, and accordingly, amounts outstanding are recorded in current liabilities.
Interest is payable monthly, and the interest rate at December 31, 2005 on borrowed funds was 4.8%
per annum, including the 0.35% commitment fee on the total $200,000,000 facility. During the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, our weighted average interest rate per annum and weighted average
borrowings under the facility were 3.7% and $23,658,000 and 2.0% and $49,548,000, respectively. At
December 31, 2005, $45,000,000 was outstanding and $148,766,000 was available under the facility.
We have no reason to believe the facility will not be renewed at the end of its current term.
As of December 31, 2005, $21,309,000 was outstanding under our $30,000,000 revolving line of
credit. The line of credit bears interest, payable quarterly, at a rate chosen by us among
available rates subject to our leverage ratio and other terms and conditions. The available rates
are the financial institutions prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) based
rate (7.25% and 5.64% per annum, respectively at December 31, 2005). Because we generally use this
line
57
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for short-term borrowing needs, our borrowings are generally at the prime rate. The credit
facility expires on December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2005, $8,691,000 was available under the
line of credit.
Our $40,000,000 secured inventories financing facility can be used to facilitate the purchases
of inventories from certain suppliers. As of December 31, 2005, there was $4,281,000 outstanding
under the inventories financing facility and $35,719,000 was available. This facility is
non-interest bearing if paid within its terms and expires March 31, 2006. We are currently
evaluating whether to renew this facility.
Our financing facilities contain various covenants including the requirement that we comply
with leverage and minimum fixed charge ratio requirements. In addition, our credit facilities
prohibit the payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent. If we fall out of compliance
with these covenants, the lenders would be able to demand payment within a specified period of
time. We were in compliance with all such covenants at December 31, 2005.
(6)
Share Repurchases
During 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $50,000,000 of our common
stock. As of December 31, 2005, we have purchased 2,725,644 shares of our common stock at a total
cost of $49,998,000 representing an average price of $18.34. All shares repurchased have been
retired. In January 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to an additional
$50,000,000 of our common stock.
(7)
Leases
We have several non-cancelable operating leases with third-parties, primarily for
administrative and distribution center space and computer equipment. Our facilities leases
generally provide for periodic rent increases and many contain escalation clauses and renewal
options. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the length of the lease term.
Rental expense for these third-party operating leases was $7,267,000, $7,950,000, and $8,766,000
for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining
lease terms in excess of one year) as of December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending December 31,
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
5,996
|
|
2007
|
|
|
5,128
|
|
2008
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
19,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
44,384
|
|
(8)
Restructuring and Acquisition Integration Activities
Severance and Restructuring Costs Expensed in 2005
During the year ended December 31, 2005, Insight UK moved into a new facility and recorded
restructuring costs of $6,887,000 for the remaining lease obligations on the previous lease, of
which $441,000 were non-cash expenses related to abandoned assets, and $1,011,000 for duplicate
rent expense for the new facility for the last half of 2005. Also, during 2005, Insight North
America, Insight UK and Direct Alliance recorded severance and restructuring expenses of
$3,650,000, $414,000 and $1,005,000, respectively, for severance attributable to the elimination of
90 positions, primarily in support and management. These amounts included the severance for the
former President of Insight North America of $2,400,000 and the President of Direct Alliance for
$1,005,000. Of the amounts recorded, $113,000, $7,127,000 and $0 remained to be paid by Insight
North America, Insight UK and Direct Alliance, respectively. In the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2005, $2,701,000 is expected to be paid in 2006 and, accordingly, is
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $4,539,000 is expected to be paid
throughout 2007 and 2008 and, accordingly, is included in long term liabilities. Management
expects these restructuring activities to have a positive effect on future operating results as
employee related expenses associated with these positions are expected to be reinvested in the
Company primarily in the areas of IT systems, account executives and sales manager headcount,
marketing and skills development.
58
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table details the changes in severance and restructuring liabilities during the
year ended December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Alliance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
$
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
7,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,005
|
|
|
$
|
12,526
|
|
Foreign currency translation and other
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(3,537
|
)
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(5,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
7,127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,240
|
|
Severance and Restructuring Costs Expensed in 2004
During the year ended December 31, 2004, Insight North America, Insight UK and Direct Alliance
recorded severance and restructuring expenses of $1,975,000, $377,000 and $83,000, respectively,
for severance attributable to the elimination of certain sales, support and management functions.
These amounts included $1,650,000 recorded for the retirement of the Executive Vice President,
Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary and the elimination of this senior
executive position. Of the amounts recorded, $137,000, $53,000 and $8,000 remained to be paid by
Insight North America, Insight UK and Direct Alliance at December 31, 2004, respectively, and were
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2004. All of these amounts were paid during the year ended December 31,
2005.
The following table details the changes in severance and restructuring liabilities during the
year ended December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Termination Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insight North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Direct Alliance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Acquisition-Related Restructuring Costs Capitalized in 2001 as a Cost of an Acquisition
During the year ended December 31, 2001, Insight UK recorded costs of $18,440,000 relating to
restructuring the operations of an acquired company as part of the integration of this acquisition.
These costs consisted of employee termination benefits and facilities-based costs of $3,532,000
and $14,908,000, respectively, of which only $3,562,000 of facilities based costs remained accrued
at December 31, 2004. Adjustments to the accrued facilities based costs during the year ended
December 31, 2005 included the settlement of a lease assumed with the acquisition for $664,000 less
than the amounts originally recorded and a decrease of $85,000 related to fluctuations in the
British pound sterling exchange rates. Facilities based costs of $2,546,000 were paid during the
year ended December 31, 2005 for lease payments and payments related to negotiating out of a
long-term lease, resulting in an accrual balance of $267,000 which is expected to be paid in 2006
and, accordingly, is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005. Although the facilities-based costs represent
contractual payments under long-term leases, we are actively pursuing opportunities to negotiate a
termination of these leases and have recorded the obligations as current accrued liabilities.
The following table details the change in these liabilities for the year ended December 31,
2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
|
Based
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
3,562
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
59
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(9)
Reductions in Liabilities Assumed in a Previous Acquisition
During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, Insight UK settled certain liabilities
assumed in a previous acquisition for $664,000 and $3,617,000, respectively, less than the amounts
originally recorded. The tax expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2005 related to
this income was $358,000. The tax expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004 related
to this income was $272,000 due to the release of the valuation allowance on the related deferred
tax asset.
(10)
Income Taxes
The following table presents the US and foreign components of earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes and the related provision for income tax expense (benefit) (in
thousands):
Earnings before income taxes from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
US
|
|
$
|
71,362
|
|
|
$
|
70,158
|
|
|
$
|
43,169
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
19,623
|
|
|
|
14,658
|
|
|
|
11,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
90,985
|
|
|
$
|
84,816
|
|
|
$
|
54,714
|
|
Provision for income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Federal
|
|
$
|
21,159
|
|
|
$
|
25,324
|
|
|
$
|
17,198
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8,131
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,825
|
|
|
|
27,463
|
|
|
|
18,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Federal
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
US State and local
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,347
|
)
|
|
|
(2,333
|
)
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
(2,734
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,641
|
|
|
$
|
24,729
|
|
|
$
|
18,952
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) relating to a discontinued operation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,437
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,753
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
The following schedule reconciles the differences between the US federal income taxes at the
US statutory rate to our provision (benefit) for income taxes (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Expected benefit at U.S. Statutory rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
31,845
|
|
|
$
|
29,686
|
|
|
$
|
19,150
|
|
Change resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
Audits and adjustments, net
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(7,689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign income taxed at different rates
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Tax benefit related to UK foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Non-deductible/ (deductible) goodwill impairment related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(751
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax expense
|
|
$
|
35,641
|
|
|
$
|
24,729
|
|
|
$
|
18,952
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
39.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
For foreign entities not treated as branches for U.S. tax purposes, we do not provide for
income taxes on the undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries as earnings are reinvested and, in
the opinion of management, will continue to be reinvested
60
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
indefinitely. The undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are deemed to be permanently
invested were $310,000 at December 31, 2005. It is not practicable to determine the unrecognized
deferred tax liability on those earnings.
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous accruals
|
|
$
|
10,256
|
|
|
$
|
13,137
|
|
Foreign tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
7,334
|
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
Depreciation allowance carryforwards
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
4,612
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns
|
|
|
5,099
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
Write-downs of inventories
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
Accrued vacation and other payroll liabilities
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Capital loss carryforward
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
36,411
|
|
|
|
38,784
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(8,251
|
)
|
|
|
(9,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
28,160
|
|
|
|
29,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(22,853
|
)
|
|
|
(19,096
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(25,915
|
)
|
|
|
(19,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
|
$
|
9,931
|
|
The net current and non-current portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Net current deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
23,850
|
|
|
$
|
21,757
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(21,605
|
)
|
|
|
(11,826
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
|
$
|
9,931
|
|
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had deferred tax assets of $9,988,000 and $12,902,000,
respectively, relating to a foreign net operating loss, foreign depreciation allowance and foreign
capital loss carryforwards. The carryforwards do not expire but are restricted in the manner in
which they are utilized pursuant to applicable jurisdictional requirements. We have provided
valuation allowances at December 31, 2005 and 2004 of $7,851,000 and $8,684,000, respectively,
representing the portions of the carryforwards that we believe are not more likely than not to be
realized due to the restrictions. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had capital loss carryforwards
of $401,000 and $401,000, respectively, which are fully reserved and expire in 2007 and 2008. The
foreign tax credit carryforward of $1,285,000 at December 31, 2005 expires in 2015. At December 31,
2002, we recorded a deferred tax asset for the estimated future deductible portion of the goodwill
impairment charge. In the future, if we determine that additional realization of these deferred
tax assets is more likely than not, the reversal of the related valuation allowance will reduce
income tax expense.
We believe it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may
be generated as a result of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, together with the tax
effects of deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover our remaining deferred tax
assets.
61
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes the change in the valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Valuation allowance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
9,084
|
|
|
$
|
16,221
|
|
Debited (credited) to income tax expense
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(7,689
|
)
|
Write-off of corresponding deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
Change in foreign exchange rates
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,251
|
|
|
$
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits of $2,540,000, $7,100,000 and $1,912,000 in the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively, related to the exercise of employee stock options and other employee
stock programs were applied to stockholders equity.
In October 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Staff
Position No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation
Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(FSP No. 109-2), which provides guidance
under FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109) with respect to
recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (the Jobs Act) on an enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability. FSP No.
109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment
to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign
earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. We have completed our evaluation of the effect of
the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act and have elected not to utilize these provisions to
repatriate the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to our operations in the United
States.
Various taxing jurisdictions are examining our tax returns for various tax years. Although the
outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the ultimate
resolution of these examinations will not result in a material adverse effect to the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
(11)
Benefit Plans
We have adopted a defined contribution benefit plan (the Defined Contribution Plan) which
complies with section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Defined Contribution Plan, we
currently match 25% of the employees pre-tax contributions up to a maximum of 6% of eligible
compensation per pay period. Contribution expense under this plan was $1,467,000, $1,459,000 and
$1,584,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
(12)
Stock Plans
We have various long-term incentive plans including stock option and restricted stock plans in
Insight Enterprises, Inc. and a stock option plan in Direct Alliance. The purpose of the plans is
to benefit and advance stockholders interests by rewarding officers, directors and certain
employees for their contributions to our success, thereby motivating them to continue to make such
contributions in the future. The plans permit grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified
stock options and restricted stock grants. The stock options generally vest over a one to five
year period from the date of grant and expire 5 to 10 years after the date of grant.
Company Plans
In October 1997, the stockholders approved the establishment of the 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the 1998 LTIP) for officers, employees, directors and consultants or independent
contractors. The 1998 LTIP authorizes grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted common stock and
performance-based awards. In 2000, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 1998 LTIP
increasing the number of shares eligible for awards to 6,000,000 and allowing our Board of
Directors to reserve (which they have done) additional shares such that the number of shares of
common stock remaining for grant under the 1998 LTIP and any of our other option plans, plus the
number of shares of common stock granted but not yet exercised, or in the case of restricted stock,
granted but not yet vested, under the 1998 LTIP and any of our other option plans, shall not exceed
20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the time of calculation of the additional
shares. This plan has no set expiration date, but the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules will require us to
obtain new stockholder approval by 2010 if we desire to continue granting awards under this plan
after 2010. As of December 31, 2005, there were 2,294,915 total shares of common stock available
to grant for awards under the 1998 LTIP and 1999 Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan.
62
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
In September 1998, we established the 1998 Employee Restricted Stock Plan (the 1998 Employee
RSP) for our employees. The total number of restricted common stock shares initially available
for grant under the 1998 Employee RSP was 562,500 and as of December 31, 2005, 434,417 of
restricted common stock were available for grant. There were no grants of restricted common stock
under this plan during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
In December 1998, we established the 1998 Officer Restricted Stock Plan (the 1998 Officer
RSP) for our officers. The total number of restricted common stock shares initially available for
grant under the 1998 Officer RSP was 56,250 and as of December 31, 2005, 490 shares of restricted
common stock were available for grant. There were no grants of restricted common stock under this
plan during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
In September 1999, we established the 1999 Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan (the 1999
Broad Based Plan) for our employees. The total number of stock options initially available for
grant under the 1999 Broad Based Plan was 1,500,000; provided, however, that no more than 20% of
the shares of stock available under the 1999 Broad Based Plan may be awarded to the Officers.
Stock options available for grant under the 1999 Broad Based Plan are included in the total shares
of common stock available to grant for awards under the 1998 LTIP and 1999 Broad Based Plan
discussed under the 1998 LTIP above.
The 1998 LTIP, 1998 Employee RSP, 1998 Officer RSP and 1999 Broad Based Plan are administered
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Except as provided below, the
Compensation Committee has the exclusive authority to administer the plans, including the power to
determine eligibility, the types of awards to be granted, the price and the timing of awards. The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has, however, delegated to our Chief Executive
Officer the authority to grant awards to individuals other than individuals who are subject to the
reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
Generally, options granted expire in five to ten years, are exercisable during the optionees
lifetime only by the recipient and are non-transferable. Unexercised options generally terminate
seven business days or 90 calendar days after an individual ceases to be an employee.
The following table summarizes our activity under the Stock Option Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance at the beginning of year
|
|
|
7,836,601
|
|
|
|
18.16
|
|
|
|
7,417,399
|
|
|
$
|
15.64
|
|
|
|
8,345,936
|
|
|
$
|
17.70
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,684,370
|
|
|
|
18.95
|
|
|
|
3,341,326
|
|
|
|
19.53
|
|
|
|
2,019,929
|
|
|
|
8.15
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(924,539
|
)
|
|
|
11.48
|
|
|
|
(2,241,410
|
)
|
|
|
12.03
|
|
|
|
(926,408
|
)
|
|
|
11.36
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,474,041
|
)
|
|
|
19.70
|
|
|
|
(680,714
|
)
|
|
|
17.55
|
|
|
|
(2,022,058
|
)
|
|
|
18.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of year
|
|
|
7,122,391
|
|
|
|
18.90
|
|
|
|
7,836,601
|
|
|
|
18.16
|
|
|
|
7,417,399
|
|
|
|
15.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of year
|
|
|
3,914,618
|
|
|
|
19.36
|
|
|
|
4,445,389
|
|
|
|
19.22
|
|
|
|
5,051,994
|
|
|
|
17.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the year
|
|
$
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes the status of outstanding stock options under the Stock Option
Plans as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Range of
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.15 16.19
|
|
|
1,566,428
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
|
|
1,029,517
|
|
|
$
|
13.76
|
|
16.25 18.53
|
|
|
1,438,314
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
18.29
|
|
|
|
347,625
|
|
|
|
17.81
|
|
18.54 19.93
|
|
|
1,455,957
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
19.55
|
|
|
|
674,281
|
|
|
|
19.48
|
|
20.00 21.25
|
|
|
1,716,840
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
21.04
|
|
|
|
935,843
|
|
|
|
21.11
|
|
21.30 41.00
|
|
|
944,852
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
24.27
|
|
|
|
927,352
|
|
|
|
24.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,122,391
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
18.90
|
|
|
|
3,914,618
|
|
|
|
19.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes our activity under the Restricted Stock Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Balance at the beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
|
|
57,211
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,578
|
)
|
|
|
(47,633
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of year
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date
fair value
|
|
$
|
19.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Alliance Stock Option Plan
In May 2000, we established the Direct Alliance Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(Direct Alliance Plan). The total number of stock options initially available for grant under
this plan, representing 15% of the outstanding shares of Direct Alliances common stock, was
4,500,000. As of December 31, 2005, the number of stock options outstanding and available for
grant under the Direct Alliance Plan was 2,042,500 and 2,457,500, respectively. We currently do
not intend to grant additional stock options under the Direct Alliance Plan. As of December 31,
2005, none of the stock options have been exercised.
The Direct Alliance Plan, which is currently administered by Direct Alliances Board of
Directors, includes provisions for granting of incentive awards in the form of stock options to
Direct Alliances employees and directors as well as to officers and employees of its parent and
corporate affiliates. The right to purchase shares under the stock option agreements currently
outstanding vested 100% on May 5, 2005 and expire on May 5, 2006.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity under the Direct Alliance Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance at 12/31/02
|
|
|
2,912,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(135,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/03 and 12/31/04
|
|
|
2,777,500
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(735,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/05
|
|
|
2,042,500
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Not applicable as no stock options were granted during the years reflected.
64
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes the status of outstanding stock options under the Direct
Alliance Plan as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.42
|
|
|
2,042,500
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
$1.42
|
|
|
|
2,042,500
|
|
|
|
$1.42
|
|
(13)
Stockholder Rights Agreement
On December 14, 1998, each stockholder of record received one Preferred Share Purchase Right
(Right) for each outstanding share of common stock owned. Each Right entitles stockholders to
buy .00148 of a share of our Series A Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $88.88. The Rights
will be exercisable if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our common stock or announces a
tender offer for 15% or more of the common stock. However, should this occur, the Right will
entitle its holder to purchase, at the Rights exercise price, a number of shares of common stock
having a market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price. Rights held by the 15%
holder will become void and will not be exercisable to purchase shares at the bargain purchase
price. If we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person
acquires 15% or more of the our common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase at the
Rights then current exercise price a number of the acquiring companys common shares having a
market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price.
(14)
Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual
We have agreed to extend to 2013 our multi-year sponsorship agreements with the Valley of the
Sun Bowl Foundation, d/b/a Insight Bowl, which is the not-for-profit entity that conducts the
Insight Bowl post-season intercollegiate football game. We have committed to pay $9,600,000 over
the next eight years for sponsorship arrangements, ticket purchases and miscellaneous expenses.
We have entered into a sponsorship agreement with the Arizona Cardinals. In conjunction with
this agreement, we have committed to pay approximately $11,000,000 over the next ten years for
advertising and marketing events at the new stadium where the Arizona Cardinals are scheduled to
play their National Football League games.
Employment Contracts
We have employment agreements with certain officers and management employees under which
severance payments would become payable and accelerated vesting of stock based compensation would
occur in the event of specified terminations without cause or terminations under certain
circumstances after a change in control. If such persons were terminated without cause or under
certain circumstances after a change of control, and the severance payments under the current
employment agreements were to become payable, the severance payments would generally be equal to
either one or two times the employees annual salary and bonus. Additionally, we would record
additional compensation expense for the acceleration of the vesting of any stock based
compensation.
Guaranties
In the ordinary course of business, we may guarantee the indebtedness of our subsidiaries to
vendors and clients. We have not recorded specific liabilities for these guaranties in the
consolidated financial statements because we have recorded the underlying liability associated with
the guaranties. In the event we were required to perform under the related contracts, we believe
the cost of such performance would not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements under which we may
agree to indemnify either our client or a third party service provider in the arrangement from any
losses incurred relating to services performed on our behalf or for losses arising from certain
defined events, which may include litigation or claims relating to past performance. These
arrangements include, but are not limited to, our indemnification of our officers and directors to
the maximum extent
65
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
under the laws of the State of Delaware, the indemnification of our lessors for certain claims
arising from our use of leased facilities, and the indemnification of the lenders that provide our
credit facilities for certain claims arising from their extension of credit to us. Such
indemnification obligations may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Management believes that
payments, if any, related to these indemnifications are not probable at December 31, 2005 and would
be immaterial. Accordingly, we have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnifications
in our consolidated financial statements.
Legal Proceedings
We are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,
including asserted preference payment claims in client bankruptcy proceedings, claims of alleged
infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and claims
of alleged non-compliance with contract provisions.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencie
s (SFAS No. 5), we make a
provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly
and are adjusted to reflect the effects of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular claim. Although litigation is
inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have adequate provisions for any probable and
estimable losses. It is possible, nevertheless, that the results of our operations or cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected in any particular period by the resolution of a legal
proceeding. Legal expenses related to defense, negotiations, settlements, rulings and advice of
outside legal counsel are expensed as incurred.
Contingencies Related to Third Party Review
From time to time, we are subject to potential claims and assessments from third parties. We
are also subject to various governmental, client and vendor audits. We continually assess whether
or not such claims have merit and warrant accrual under the probable and estimable criteria of
SFAS No. 5. Where appropriate, we accrue estimates of anticipated liabilities in the financial
statements. Such estimates are subject to change and may affect our results of operations and our
cash flows.
(15)
Supplemental Financial Information
A summary of additions and deductions related to the allowances for doubtful accounts
receivable and allowances for sales returns for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
15,472
|
|
|
$
|
5,291
|
|
|
$
|
(4,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
20,175
|
|
|
$
|
5,606
|
|
|
$
|
(10,309
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
13,759
|
|
|
$
|
8,424
|
|
|
$
|
(2,008
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for sales returns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
(226
|
)
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(217
|
)
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16)
Segment and Geographic Information
SFAS No. 131 requires disclosures of certain information regarding operating segments,
products and services, geographic areas of operation and major clients. The method for determining
what information to report under SFAS No. 131 is based upon the management approach, or the way
that management organizes the operating segments within a company, for which separate financial
information is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) in deciding how
to allocate resources. Our CODM is our Chief Executive Officer.
66
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
At December 31, 2005, we have the following reportable operating segments:
|
|
|
Provider of IT products and services North America (Insight North America);
|
|
|
|
|
Provider of IT products and services United Kingdom (Insight UK); and
|
|
|
|
|
Business process outsourcing provider (Direct Alliance).
|
As permitted by SFAS No. 131, we have utilized the aggregation criteria in combining our
operations in Canada with the Insight North America segment because they provide the same products
and services to similar clients and are considered together when the CODM decides how to allocate
resources.
All intercompany transactions are eliminated upon consolidation and there are no differences
between the accounting policies used to measure profit and loss for our segments and on a
consolidated basis. Net sales are defined as net sales to external clients. None of our clients
exceeded ten percent of consolidated net sales.
A portion of our operating segments selling and administrative expenses arise from
shared services and infrastructure that we have historically provided to them in order to realize
economies of scale and to efficiently use resources. These expenses, collectively called corporate
charges, include legal, tax insurance services, treasury, senior management expenses and other
corporate infrastructure expenses. Charges are allocated to our operating segments, and the
allocations have been determined on a basis that we considered to be a reasonable reflection of the
utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the operating segments.
The tables below present information about our reportable operating segments as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Insight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Alliance
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,713,468
|
|
|
$
|
470,239
|
|
|
$
|
77,443
|
|
|
$
|
3,261,150
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
2,402,343
|
|
|
|
406,824
|
|
|
|
60,072
|
|
|
|
2,869,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
311,125
|
|
|
|
63,415
|
|
|
|
17,371
|
|
|
|
391,911
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
232,166
|
|
|
|
50,771
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
289,250
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
8,312
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
12,967
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a
previous acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$
|
75,309
|
|
|
$
|
4,996
|
|
|
$
|
10,053
|
|
|
$
|
90,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,114,325
|
|
|
$
|
144,583
|
|
|
$
|
71,215
|
|
|
$
|
922,340
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
Insight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Alliance
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,557,402
|
|
|
$
|
451,202
|
|
|
$
|
74,121
|
|
|
$
|
3,082,725
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
2,267,798
|
|
|
|
389,608
|
|
|
|
54,888
|
|
|
|
2,712,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
289,604
|
|
|
|
61,594
|
|
|
|
19,233
|
|
|
|
370,431
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
225,956
|
|
|
|
53,454
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
285,742
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a
previous acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$
|
61,673
|
|
|
$
|
11,380
|
|
|
$
|
12,818
|
|
|
$
|
85,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
895,682
|
|
|
$
|
148,308
|
|
|
$
|
68,003
|
|
|
$
|
887,641
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
Insight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Insight UK
|
|
|
Alliance
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,430,005
|
|
|
$
|
379,785
|
|
|
$
|
76,257
|
|
|
$
|
2,886,047
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
2,162,685
|
|
|
|
328,988
|
|
|
|
54,913
|
|
|
|
2,546,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
267,320
|
|
|
|
50,797
|
|
|
|
21,344
|
|
|
|
339,461
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
228,129
|
|
|
|
45,853
|
|
|
|
5,557
|
|
|
|
279,539
|
|
Severance and restructuring expenses
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,465
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed
in a previous acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$
|
36,269
|
|
|
$
|
6,905
|
|
|
$
|
15,787
|
|
|
$
|
58,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
771,103
|
|
|
$
|
118,114
|
|
|
$
|
57,914
|
|
|
$
|
792,124
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Consolidated total assets include net intercompany eliminations and corporate assets of
$407,783, $224,352, and $155,007 at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
The following is a summary of our geographic operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
Foreign*
|
|
Total
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,650,624
|
|
|
$
|
610,526
|
|
|
$
|
3,261,150
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
180,791
|
|
|
$
|
39,571
|
|
|
$
|
220,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,513,990
|
|
|
$
|
568,735
|
|
|
$
|
3,082,725
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
161,066
|
|
|
$
|
39,052
|
|
|
$
|
200,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,413,016
|
|
|
$
|
473,031
|
|
|
$
|
2,886,047
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
184,466
|
|
|
$
|
36,863
|
|
|
$
|
221,329
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Includes our continuing operations in the United Kingdom and Canada.
|
Although we could be affected by the international economic climate, management does not
believe material credit risk concentration existed at December 31, 2005. We monitor our clients
financial condition and do not require collateral. Historically, we have not experienced
significant losses related to accounts receivable from any individual clients or similar groups of
clients.
(17)
Non-Operating (Income) Expense, Net
Non-operating (income) expense, net consists primarily of interest income and interest
expense. Interest income of $3,394,000, $1,849,000 and $833,000 for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was generated through short-term investments. Interest expense
of $1,914,000, $2,011,000 and $2,608,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, primarily relates to borrowings under our financing facilities. Other expense, net,
of $853,000, $893,000 and $2,472,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, consists primarily of bank fees associated with our financing facilities and cash
management and miscellaneous foreign currency gains or losses. In 2004, we recorded gains from
Insight UKs sale of a building of $328,000 and Direct Alliances sale of stock upon exercise of
stock options that were received from a client several years ago as compensation for a note payable
extension of $516,000. These gains were offset partially by non-operating expenses in 2004 of
$400,000 related to the losses and write-off of an equity method investee. Additionally, in 2003,
we also recorded prepayment penalties of $628,000 and written off capitalized loan origination fees
of $173,000 associated with the prepayment of building mortgages in 2003.
68
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(18)
Discontinued Operation
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we sold our 95% ownership in PlusNet, an internet
service provider in the United Kingdom which had been accounted for as a separate operating
segment. We sold 55% of our investment during PlusNets IPO and our remaining investment in
December 2004. We received net proceeds of approximately $45,478,000 and recorded a gain of
$23,725,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004. Recorded on December 31, 2004 consolidated
balance sheet was a receivable from the underwriter of $28,024,000 for the proceeds of the sale of
the remaining shares in December 2004, which was received in January 2005. Additionally, we
recorded bonus expenses of $3,229,000, including employer taxes, related to a management incentive
plan with the top executives at PlusNet. The management incentive plan compensated them, as a
group, with approximately 12.5% of the gain, after certain adjustments, related to all sales of
PlusNet shares owned by Insight Enterprises. The bonus expenses were included in selling and
administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
The following amounts for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, represent
PlusNets results of operations and have been segregated from continuing operations and reflected
as a discontinued operation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
23,161
|
|
|
$
|
28,305
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
15,892
|
|
|
|
18,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,269
|
|
|
|
9,882
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
6,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
Non-operating expense (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Gain on sale of investment in PlusNet
|
|
|
(23,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(984
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before income taxes
|
|
|
27,194
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
20,441
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
69
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(19)
Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
As required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K, the following table sets forth selected unaudited
consolidated quarterly financial information for our two most recent years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
832,851
|
|
|
$
|
844,049
|
|
|
$
|
804,883
|
|
|
$
|
779,367
|
|
|
$
|
805,684
|
|
|
$
|
798,496
|
|
|
$
|
757,060
|
|
|
$
|
721,485
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
734,352
|
|
|
|
744,658
|
|
|
|
706,110
|
|
|
|
684,119
|
|
|
|
710,885
|
|
|
|
705,800
|
|
|
|
664,407
|
|
|
|
631,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
98,499
|
|
|
|
99,391
|
|
|
|
98,773
|
|
|
|
95,248
|
|
|
|
94,799
|
|
|
|
92,696
|
|
|
|
92,653
|
|
|
|
90,283
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
70,649
|
|
|
|
73,245
|
|
|
|
74,376
|
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
74,249
|
|
|
|
70,192
|
|
|
|
71,236
|
|
|
|
70,065
|
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses
|
|
|
7,520
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in
a previous acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
20,330
|
|
|
|
24,763
|
|
|
|
20,333
|
|
|
|
24,932
|
|
|
|
20,550
|
|
|
|
20,526
|
|
|
|
21,417
|
|
|
|
23,378
|
|
Non-operating (income) expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
20,102
|
|
|
|
24,951
|
|
|
|
20,651
|
|
|
|
25,281
|
|
|
|
20,234
|
|
|
|
19,931
|
|
|
|
20,895
|
|
|
|
23,756
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
8,337
|
|
|
|
9,569
|
|
|
|
7,966
|
|
|
|
9,769
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
7,705
|
|
|
|
6,712
|
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
|
|
15,382
|
|
|
|
12,685
|
|
|
|
15,512
|
|
|
|
17,238
|
|
|
|
12,226
|
|
|
|
14,183
|
|
|
|
16,440
|
|
Earnings (loss) from
discontinued
operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,753
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
|
|
15,382
|
|
|
|
12,685
|
|
|
|
15,512
|
|
|
|
30,991
|
|
|
|
19,921
|
|
|
|
13,028
|
|
|
|
16,588
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of taxes
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
11,116
|
|
|
$
|
15,382
|
|
|
$
|
12,685
|
|
|
$
|
15,512
|
|
|
$
|
30,991
|
|
|
$
|
19,921
|
|
|
$
|
13,028
|
|
|
$
|
16,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
70
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There were no disagreements with accountants on accounting or financial disclosure
matters during the periods reported herein.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Annual Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual
Report. The controls evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO).
Attached as exhibits to this Annual Report are certifications of the CEO and the CFO, which
are required by Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and should be read in conjunction with the
certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Definition of Disclosure Controls.
Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Disclosure Controls include components
of our internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. To the extent that components of our
internal control over financial reporting are included within our Disclosure Controls, they are
included in the scope of our annual controls evaluation.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the control system will be met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons,
by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any
system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of
the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud
may occur and not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation
The evaluation of our Disclosure Controls included a review of the objectives and design of
the controls, our implementation of the controls and the effect of the controls on the information
generated for use in this Annual Report. In the course of the controls evaluation, we sought to
identify data errors, controls problems or acts of fraud and confirm that appropriate corrective
action, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This type of evaluation is
performed on an annual basis so that the conclusions of management, including the CEO and CFO,
concerning controls effectiveness can be reported in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K. Many of the
components of our Disclosure Controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by our internal audit
department and by other personnel in our finance organization. Our goal is to monitor our
Disclosure Controls and modify them as necessary. Our intent is to maintain the Disclosure
Controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
71
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Among other matters, we also considered whether our evaluation identified any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and
whether we had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel with a significant role in our
internal control over financial reporting. This information was important both for the controls
evaluation generally and because item 5 in the certifications of the CEO and CFO, filed as exhibits
31.1 and 31.2 to this report, require that the CEO and CFO disclose that information to our Boards
Audit Committee and to our independent auditors. We interpret significant deficiencies to mean a
control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects our ability to
initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with
GAAP such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of our annual or interim
financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. We
understand that the term material weakness in internal control is a significant deficiency, or
combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a
material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected. We also sought to address other control matters in the controls evaluation, and in each
case if a problem was identified, we considered what revision, improvement and/or correction to
make in accordance with our ongoing procedures.
Conclusions
Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report, our Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that material information relating to Insight Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to management, including the CEO and CFO.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control -
Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, our management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, as stated in their report which can be found in Item 8 of this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fourth quarter
of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
72
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information required by this item and included under the captions Information
Concerning Directors and Executive Officers, Meetings of the Board and Its Committees, Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and Code of Ethics and can be found in our
definitive Proxy Statement relating to our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 4,
2006 (our Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The information required by this item and included under the captions Executive
Compensation, Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-of-Control
Arrangements, Meetings of the Board and Its Committees Compensation of Directors,
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation, Stock Price Performance Graph and
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation can be found in our Proxy Statement
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item and included under the captions Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Securities Authorized for Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans can be found in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item and included under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions can be found in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item and included under the captions Audit
Committee Report and Relationship with Independent Auditors can be found in our Proxy Statement
and is incorporated herein by reference.
73
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries and the
Independent Auditors Report are filed herein beginning on page 44 as set forth under Item 8 of
this report.
Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required, not
applicable, or the information is otherwise included.
(b) Exhibits
The exhibits list in the Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page is
incorporated herein by reference as the list of exhibits required as part of this report.
74
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Tempe, State of Arizona, on this 16
th
day of February,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Richard A. Fennessy
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne
|
|
Treasurer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy A Crown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director (Chairman Emeritus)
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric J. Crown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry A. Gunning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robertson C. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael M. Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bennett Dorrance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen S. Pushor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
Commission File No. 000-25092
(Unless otherwise noted, exhibits are filed herewith.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Certificate of Incorporation of
Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 of our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1999 filed on March 30,
2000).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designation of Series A
Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
5 of our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on
March 17, 1999).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-86142) declared
effective January 24, 1995).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Rights Agreement and Exhibits A and B
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed on March 17, 1999).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.31 of our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-86142) declared
effective January 24, 1995).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of our
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1995).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-110915) declared
effective December 4, 2003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
1998 Employee Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of our Form S-8 filed on
December 17, 1998).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
1998 Officer Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Form S-8 filed on
December 17, 1998).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
1999 Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 filed on March 30, 2000).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Direct Alliance Corporation 2000 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000 filed on March 27, 2001).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Executive Service Agreement between Insight Direct
UK Limited and Stuart Fenton dated September 12, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 filed on March 27, 2003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of December
31, 2002 among Insight Receivables, LLC, Insight
Enterprises, Inc., Jupiter Securitization
Corporation, Bank One NA (main office Chicago), and
the entities party thereto from time to time as
financial institutions (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.38 of our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 filed on March 27,
2003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement
dated as of September 3, 2003 by and among Insight
Direct USA, Inc. and Insight Public Sector, Inc. as
originators, and Insight Receivables, LLC, as buyer
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 filed November 13, 2003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Purchase Agreement
dated as of September 3, 2003 among Insight
Receivables, LLC, Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
Jupiter Securitization Corporation, Bank One NA
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 filed November 13, 2003).
|
76
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
Commission File No. 000-25092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
10.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Receivables Purchase Agreement
dated as of December 23, 2003 among Insight
Receivables, LLC, Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
Jupiter Securitization Corporation, Bank One NA
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 of our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 filed March 11, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and Timothy A. Crown dated as of February 14,
2004, to be effective November 1, 2003 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.43 of our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed
March 11, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and P. Robert Moya dated as of February 14,
2004, to be effective November 1, 2003 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.45 of our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed
March 11, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty Agreement by Insight Enterprises, Inc. in
favor of Dell Corporation dated June 17, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 filed August 9, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
PlusNet Placing Agreement between PlusNet plc, The
Executive Directors, The Non-Executive Directors,
Insight Direct (GB) Limited, Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and Robert W. Baird Limited dated as of July 8,
2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 filed August 9, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and Karen K. McGinnis dated as of and effective
October 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed November
8, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and Richard A. Fennessy dated as of October 24,
2004, effective November 15, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our current report on
Form 8-K filed October 28, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Summary description of 2005 bonus formula for
certain executives (incorporated by reference to Item
1.01 of our current report on Form 8-K filed February
14, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and Stanley Laybourne dated as of November 23,
2004, effective November 1, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 of our annual report on
Form 10-K filed March 7, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Direct
Worldwide, Inc. and Dino Farfante dated as of
November 23, 2004, effective November 1, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of our
annual report on Form 10-K filed March 7, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Insight
Direct Worldwide, Inc. and Dino Farfante and
Assignment to Insight North America, Inc. dated as of
February 25, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 of our annual report on Form 10-K filed
March 7, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Direct Alliance
Corporation and Branson M. Smith dated as of November
23, 2004, effective November 1, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our annual report on
Form 10-K filed March 7, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Executive Service Agreement between
Insight Direct (UK) Limited and Stuart Fenton dated
as of March 1, 2005, effective July 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of our
annual report on Form 10-K filed March 7, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Insight Enterprises, Inc. and Timothy A. Crown dated
as of March 4, 2005 and effective March 1, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Items 1.01 & 1.02 of
our current report on Form 8-K filed March 10, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises,
Inc. and Gary M. Glandon dated as of February 9, 2005
and effective February 21, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Grants of options and restricted stock for certain
executives (incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of
our current report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Executive Service Agreement between
Insight Direct (UK) and Stuart Fenton dated as of
March 1, 2005 and effective July 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
on March 31, 2005 filed May 9, 2005).
|
77
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
Commission File No. 000-25092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
10.29
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement
between Insight Enterprises, Inc. and Karen K.
McGinnis dated as of April 26, 2005 and
effective January 1, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our quarterly
report on Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Receivables Purchase
Agreement dated as of March 25, 2005 among
Insight Receivables, LLC (the Seller),
Insight Enterprises, Inc. (the Servicer), JP
Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (successor by merger to
Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago)), as a
Financial Institution and as Agent (in its
capacity as Agent, the Agent), and Jupiter
Securitization Corporation (Jupiter)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed May 9,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement
between Insight North America, Inc. and Dino
D. Farfante dated April 26, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed May 3, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Direct
USA, Inc. and Mark McGrath dated as of May 15,
2005 to be effective May 23, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
our current report on Form 8-K filed May 19,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement
between Direct Alliance Corporation and
Branson Smith dated July 11, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
our current report on Form 8-K filed July 12,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Compensation plan for Catherine Eckstein
(incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed July 28,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Compensation plan for David Rice
(incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed July 28,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Compensation plan for James Kebert
(incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed July 28,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Compensation plan for Stuart Fenton
(incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed July 28,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Summary description of 2006 incentive
compensation plans for certain executives
(incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed December 20,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Receivables Purchase
Agreement dated as of December 19, 2005 among
Insight Receivables, LLC (the Seller),
Insight Enterprises, Inc. (the Servicer), JP
Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (successor by merger to
Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago)), as a
Financial Institution and as Agent (in its
capacity as Agent, the Agent), and Jupiter
Securitization Corporation (Jupiter)
(incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed December 22,
2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Direct Alliance
Corporation and James Kebert dated January 11,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of our current report on Form 8-K filed
January 17, 2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Grants of restricted stock units under 2006
incentive compensation plan for certain
executives (incorporated by reference to Item
1.01 of our current report on Form 8-K filed
January 23, 2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule
13a-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule
13a-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
(1)
|
|
We have entered into a separate indemnification agreement with each of the
following directors and executive officers that differ only in party names and dates: Eric J.
Crown, Timothy A. Crown, Larry A. Gunning, Robertson C. Jones, Michael M. Fisher, Bennett
Dorrance, Kathleen S. Pushor, Stanley Laybourne, Richard A. Fennessy and Karen K. McGinnis.
Pursuant to the instructions accompanying Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant is filing
the form of such indemnification agreement.
|
(2)
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
78