UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

[   ]     TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

Commission file number: 333-146533

HAGUE CORP.
( Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter )
 
Nevada
20-8195578
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
7700 S. River Parkway
Tempe, AZ 85284
(Address of principal executive offices)

           214-701-8779           
 (Registrant's telephone number)
___________________________
 
Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the 12 preceding months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such file). Yes [   ]      No [    ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [  ] No [X ].
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [  ]   No [X]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘accelerated filer and large accelerated filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large Accelerated Filer [ ]  
Accelerated Filer         [ ]
Accelerated Filer       [ ]      
Smaller Reporting Company [X]
 
As of November 23, 2009, the issuer had 76,725,167 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share outstanding (" Common Stock ").

 
1

 
 INDEX

 
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  Page
   
Item 1.  Financial Statements
3
   
Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and June 30, 2009
3
   
Consolidated statements of operations, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 and for the period from inception (May 19, 2008) through September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
4
   
 
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 (unaudited)
5
  
 
Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
6
   
Item 2.  Management’s Plan of Operation.
13
   
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures and Market Risk
19
   
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
19
   
PART 2 – OTHER INFORMATION
20
   
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
20
   
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
20
   
Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities
20
   
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
20
   
Item 5.  Other Information
20
   
Item 6.  Exhibits
21
   
Signatures
22
 
 
2

 
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
Hague Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
             
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
             
             
   
September 30
   
June 30
 
   
2009
   
2009
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Current
           
Current assets
  $ -     $ -  
                 
Total current assets     -       -  
                 
Licenses
    40,000       40,000  
Furniture and equipment, net of amortization
    11,369       16,520  
Deferred financing cost, net
    219,917       246,167  
                 
Total other assets     271,286       302,687  
                 
Total assets
  $ 271,286     $ 302,687  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT
               
Current liabilities
               
Bank indebtedness
  $ -     $ 1,377  
Accounts payable and accrued Liabilities
    581,265       349,110  
Accrued liabilities - related party
    339,678       162,687  
Fair value of embedded conversion feature
    575,401       -  
                 
Total current liabilities
    1,496,344       513,174  
                 
Convertible debenture, net of discount
    133,718       540,726  
                 
Total liabilities     1,630,062       1,053,900  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies
               
                 
Stockholder's deficit
               
Common stock, $0.001 par value,
               
Authorized, 100,000,000 shares
               
Issued and outstanding 69,881,493 as of
               
  September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009     69,881       69,881  
Additional paid-in capital
    990,907       1,203,091  
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
    (2,419,564 )     (2,024,185 )
                 
Total stockholders' deficit
    (1,358,776 )     (751,213 )
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
  $ 271,286     $ 302,687  
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
                 


3


Hague Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ending September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008
and May 19, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
                   
   
Three months
   
Three months
   
Inception
 
   
ended
   
ended
   
through
 
   
September 30
   
September 30
   
September 30
 
   
2009
   
2008
   
2009
 
                   
Operating expenses:
                 
General and administrative
  $ 197,448     $ 35,462     $ 1,431,680  
Research and development
    185,473       -       596,893  
                         
Total operating expenses
    382,921       35,462       2,028,573  
                         
Loss from operations
    (382,921 )     (35,462 )     (2,028,573 )
                         
Other expenses:
                       
Amortization of convertible debenture discount
    39,363       -       167,866  
Amortization of deferred finance cost
    26,250       -       95,083  
Change in fair value of embeded conversion feature
    79,489       -       19,042  
Interest expense
    30,000       -       109,000  
                         
Total other expenses
    (175,102 )     -       (390,991 )
                         
Net loss
  $ (558,023 )   $ (35,462 )   $ (2,419,564 )
                         
Basic and diluted loss per common share
  $ (0.01 )   $ (0.00 )        
                         
Weighted average number of common
                       
shares outstanding     69,881,493       40,279,891          
                         
                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
                         

4


 
Hague Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ending September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008
and May 19, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
                   
   
Three months
   
Three months
   
Inception
 
   
ended
   
ended
   
through
 
   
September 30
   
September 30
   
September 30
 
   
2009
   
2008
   
2009
 
                   
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                 
                   
Net loss for the period
  $ (558,023 )   $ (35,462 )   $ (2,419,564 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
                       
used in operating activities:
                       
Stock issued for services
    -       -       3,700  
Depreciation of furniture and office equipment
    1,303       -       4,165  
Amortization of convertible debenture discount
    39,363       -       167,866  
Amortization of deferred finance cost
    26,250       -       95,083  
Change in fair value of warrants and embeded
                       
   conversion feature
    79,489       -       19,042  
Net change in:
                       
Bank indebtedness
    (1,377 )     -       -  
Prepaids
    -       (10,252 )     -  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    232,156       7,450       618,064  
Accrued liabilities - related party
    176,991       4,208       339,678  
                         
Cash flows used in operating activities
    (3,848 )     (34,056 )     (1,171,966 )
                         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                       
Purchase of license
    -       -       (40,000 )
Proceeds from disposal of furniture and equipment
    3,848       -       3,848  
Purchase of furniture & equipment
    -       -       (19,382 )
                         
Cash flows used in investing activities
    3,848       -       (55,534 )
                         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    -       34,155       42,500  
Proceeds from convertible debenture issued
    -       -       1,500,000  
Payment of deferred finance cost
    -       -       (315,000 )
                         
Cash flows from financing activities
    -       34,155       1,227,500  
                         
NET INCREASE IN CASH
    -       99       -  
                         
Cash, beginning of the period
    -       -       -  
                         
Cash, end of the period
  $ -     $ 99     $ -  
                         
Supplemental disclosure with respect to cash flows:
                       
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ -     $ -     $ -  
Cash paid for interest
  $ -     $ -     $ -  
Non cash transaction
                       
Common stock issued for debenture interest
  $ -     $ -     $ 39,000  
Issuance of common stock in connection
                       
    with recapitalization
  $ -     $ -     $ 2,202  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
                       
  principle on convertible notes
  $ 49,541     $ -     $ 49,541  
                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
5


 

HAGUE CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009. The results for the three months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending June 30, 2010.
 
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting guidance, effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, which requires us to disclose the date through which we have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date corresponds with the release of our financial statements.  We have evaluated subsequent events through November 20, 2009, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.
 
Solterra   is a start-up solar technology and quantum dot manufacturing firm which was founded by Stephen Squires. Mr. Squires perceives an opportunity to acquire a significant amount of both quantum dot and solar photovoltaic market share by commercializing a low cost quantum dot processing technology and a low cost quantum dot based third generation photovoltaic technology/solar cell, pursuant to an exclusive license agreement with William Marsh Rice University (“Rice University” or “Rice”).  Our objective is to become the first bulk manufacture of high quality tetrapod quantum dots and the first solar cell manufacturer to be able to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
 
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105-10, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The FASB will now issue new standards in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the changes in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance have been updated for the Codification throughout this document.
 
6


 
In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF 07-05, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”, which was codified into ASC Topic 815-40-15 effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This topic addresses the determination of whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. If an instrument (or an embedded feature) that has the characteristics of a derivative instrument under the relative paragraphs of Statement 133 is indexed to an entity’s own stock, it is still necessary to evaluate whether it is classified in stockholders’ equity (or would be classified in stockholders’ equity if it were a freestanding instrument). The guidance in this topic shall be applied to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this Issue is initially applied. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle shall be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or net assets in the statement of financial position) for that fiscal year, presented separately. However, in circumstances in which a previously bifurcated embedded conversion option in a convertible debt instrument no longer meets the bifurcation criteria in Statement 133 at initial application of this topic, the carrying amount of the liability for the conversion option (that is, its fair value on the date of adoption) shall be reclassified to shareholders’ equity. Any debt discount that was recognized when the conversion option was initially bifurcated from the convertible debt instrument shall continue to be amortized. The adoption of ASC 815-40-15 effected our consolidated financial position and results of operations as disclosed in Note 5.
 
Note 2. Nature and Continuance of Operations
 
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year.  Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying value and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  At September  30, 2009, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, has accumulated losses of $2,419,564 since its inception, at September 30, 2009, has a working capital deficit of $1,496,344, which will not be sufficient to sustain operations over the next twelve months, and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company requires immediate and  substantial additional financing during fiscal 2010 to maintain its development stage operations. The Company is exploring all avenues of financing at this time and can provide no assurances that such financing will be obtained on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all.
 
Note 3. Related party transactions
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company accrued $30,000 which was expensed but not paid for services to the CEO / major shareholder.   During the three months ended September 30, 2009 the Company recorded $2,880 of rent expense for the use of executive office space in the home of the CEO / major shareholder.
 
Included in accrued liabilities – related party of $339,679 is $114,828 due to a director of the Company for $11,509 of expenses paid by the Director on behalf of the Company, $43,319 of cash advances paid to the Company and unpaid wages of $60,000.   The remainder of the accrued liabilities – related party $224,851 consists of unpaid wages, $212,500, and unpaid expenses, $12,351, to officers and other related parties of the Company.  At June 30, 2009 there was $40,638 due the director of the Company and $122,319 due the officers of the Company.
 
7

 

Note 4. Convertible debentures
 
On November 4, 2008, Hague Corp entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, Debenture, Security Agreement, Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement, Escrow Agreement, Stock Pledge Agreement and other related transactional documents (the “Transaction Documents”) to obtain $1,500,000 in gross proceeds from three non-affiliated parties (collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Lenders”) in exchange for 3,525,000 restricted shares of Common Stock of Hague Corp (the “Restricted Shares”) and Debentures in the principal amount aggregating $1,500,000. Each Debenture has a term of three years maturing on November 4, 2011 bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum and is prepayable by Hague Corp at anytime without penalty, subject to the Debenture holders’ conversion rights.  In recognition of the 3,525,000 shares issued, the Company recorded a discount of $1,155,826.  The discount is made up of two components, $577,913 related to the discount for the relative fair value of the shares issued and $577,913 related to a beneficial conversion feature. The discount will be amortized over the 3 year life of the debenture and recorded as interest expense.   Each Debenture is convertible at the option of each Lender into Hague Corp’s Common Stock (the “Debenture Shares”, which together with the Restricted Shares shall collectively be referred to as the “Securities”) at a conversion price of $.2667 per share (the “Conversion Price”). The Registration Rights Agreement requires Hague Corp to register the resale of the Securities within certain time limits and to be subject to certain penalties in the event Hague Corp fails to timely file the Registration Statement, fails to obtain an effective Registration Statement or, once effective, to maintain an effective Registration Statement until the Securities are saleable pursuant to Rule 144 without volume restriction or other limitations on sale.  The Debentures are secured by the assets of Hague Corp and are guaranteed by Solterra as Hague Corp’s subsidiary. In the event the Debentures are converted in their entirety, Hague Corp would be required to issue an aggregate of 5,624,297 shares of Hague Corp’s Common Stock, subject to anti-dilution protection for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, reclassifications and sale of Hague Corp’s Common Stock a price below the Conversion Price.  Certain changes of control or fundamental transactions such as a merger or consolidation with another company could cause an event of default under the Transaction Documents.  We also entered into a 120-day Standstill Agreement with the Debenture Holders effective June 1, 2009 which was amended to currently expire at the close of business on December 1, 2009.  The Standstill Agreement provides for the resignation of a director, the transfer of Solterra’s License Agreement with Rice to Hague and for Solterra to obtain from Hague a worldwide exclusive license to purchase quantum dots for solar purposes and to grant sublicenses. To date, the Company has not obtained the consent of Rice to accomplish these objectives. The Standstill Agreement puts a moratorium on the rights of Debenture Holders, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Standstill Agreement.
 
The deferred financing costs related to the issuance of the debenture are recorded as deferred charges and are being amortized over 36 months using the effective interest method.  During the three months ended September 30, 2009, amortization expense of $26,250 was recorded.
 
The Transaction Documents include a Stock Pledge Agreement pursuant to which Stephen Squires has pledged 20,000,000 shares of our Common Stock to the Debenture holders (the “Holders”) until such time as the Debentures are paid in their entirety.  
 
Standstill Agreement
 
On June 1, 2009, the Company and its Debenture Holders entered into a Standstill Agreement which provided for a 120-day standstill period pursuant to which the Debenture Holders would not exercise their rights under the Debentures, security agreements, guarantee, pledge agreement and other related “Transaction Documents.” In October 2009 by separate agreement, the Standstill Period was extended by the Debenture Holders through the close of business on December 1, 2009. The following is a summary of some of the material provisions of the Standstill Agreement:
 
·  
The Debenture Holders received warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Hague’s Common Stock, exercisable at $.25 per share over a period of 18 months together with cashless exercise provisions in the event no registration statement is effective at the time of exercise. Of the 1,000,000 warrants, the Debenture Holders assigned 175,000 warrants and 75,000 warrants to Dr. Isaac Horton and Richard Patton, respectively. Messrs. Horton and Patton served as directors of Hague in accordance with the Debenture Holders’ right to appoint two members to the Board of Directors. Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares exercisable at $.10 per share through October 31, 2014 were issued for an extension of the Standstill Agreement. These Warrants also contain cashless exercise provisions in the event that there is no current registration statement effective at the time of exercise.
 
8

 
·  
Certain stockholders of the Company were to exchange up to 2,350,000 shares of free trading shares for restricted shares of Hague’s Common Stock.
 
·  
The Company would seek to raise additional financing either in Hague or in Solterra. If the financing was in Solterra and at least $2,000,000 was raised, then the Debenture Holders would have the right to have Hague assign its Debenture obligation to Solterra and to permit the Debenture Holders to convert their indebtedness into Solterra Common Stock at a 25% discount to terms of the private placement offering. As of November 20, 2009, no additional equity financing has been raised by the Company.
 
·  
On November 12, 2009, Dr. Horton resigned from the Board of Directors. The Debenture Holders may replace Mr. Horton with David Skriloff.

·  
Upon Hague’s receipt of $250,000 of financing, Hague has agreed to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and agree to maintain same for at least three years and to indemnify Mr. Skriloff to the fullest extent provided by Nevada law should he agree to join the Board.
 
·  
On or before Solterra’s acceptance of any private financing, Solterra shall assign its license agreement with Rice University to Hague. Simultaneously, Hague shall grant Solterra the exclusive worldwide right under the Rice License Agreement to purchase the quantum dots for solar purposes, including the right to grant sublicenses. The Company shall obtain the written permission of Rice University to accomplish the foregoing. Hague shall be the sole supplier of the quantum dots to Solterra and to its sublicensees.  Solterra shall pay a licensing fee to Hague in an amount necessary to retire the Company’s Notes (principal and accrued but unpaid interest) in full (unless the Noteholders agree to have Solterra assume these obligations from Hague and convert into common stock of Solterra), plus the sum of $1.0 million.  It is understood that Solterra will be the solar sub and Hague shall produce and sell the quantum dots and shall have the right to grant sublicenses for all other purposes. During the Standstill Period and thereafter, except as otherwise provided, Hague shall not transfer and/or sell any of its assets without the express prior written consent of the Noteholders, unless the Notes have been repaid or converted. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit Hague or Solterra from licensing its Intellectual Property or selling its quantum dots in a business unrelated to solar to third parties in arm’s-length transactions.
 
·  
Upon conversion of the Noteholders’ Notes into Solterra common stock or the repayment of the Notes in full, the following shall occur: (i) all security interests, registration rights and other such rights and obligations of the Noteholders (as noteholders only and in no other capacity) shall be terminated, (ii) if elected Mr. Skriloff, shall resign from the Board of Directors of Hague, and (iii) the Noteholders, Hague and Solterra shall exchange general releases which shall pertain to all past actions of the Noteholders, as Noteholders, stockholders or security holders in Hague or Solterra, as the case may be.
 
·  
The Hague Board shall agree to hold board meetings no less frequently than monthly, until the completion of the Private Offering and/or grants of at least $2.0 million. It is further agreed that Hague shall adopt a “Directors Manual: Public Corporation Governance and Guidelines,” which includes a Code of Business Ethics, in the form customarily adopted by smaller public companies and comply with all applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
·  
Upon the completion of Solterra’s financing efforts, it will endeavor to become an independent public entity through a self-directed offering and the following actions would occur: Solterra’s Board would be expanded to include additional directors. Mr. Squires would remain Chief Executive Officer of one of these two companies with a new Chief Executive Officer to be identified and hired on commercially reasonable terms to run the other company. Mr. Squires would serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company in which he is Chief Executive Officer and he would serve as a director of the other company. In the interim, until a new Chief Executive Officer is found for the company in which he chooses not to serve as Chief Executive Officer, he will serve as interim Chief Executive Officer until his replacement is hired.
 
·  
The provisions of the Standstill Agreement (except as otherwise provided therein) shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect ab initio, as if this agreement never took place or upon the happening of one of the following events: (a) the entry of an order for relief against Hague or Solterra (or equivalent thereof) in any case under title 11 of the United States Code (or in connection with any case or proceeding involving Hague or Solterra under any state or federal insolvency law, (b) if Hague or Solterra fails to make any required payments, under the terms of its agreements with Rice University or Arizona State University, but only where either university notifies Hague or Solterra that it is in default and that all opportunities to cure the default have past, or (c) upon a material default (breach) of the Standstill Agreement by Hague or Solterra and after being given written notice of such default and at least five business days opportunity to cure the default.

·  
In connection with the standstill agreement, the Company recorded $34,148 as additional debt discount for the modification of terms, which will be amortized over the life debt. The Company determined the conversion feature issued to the Noteholders to convert their interest into the common stock of Solterra was a derivative liability. The Company determined the value of the derivative liability was nominal due to the low probability of the Company or Solterra raising $2.0 million during the standstill agreement.

9

 
Note 5. Derivatives and Fair Value
 
The Company has evaluated the application of ASC 815 to the Convertible Note issued November 4, 2008.  Based on the guidance in ASC 815, the Company concluded these instruments were required to be accounted for as derivatives as of July 1, 2009 due to the down round protection feature on the conversion price and the exercise price.  The Company records the fair value of these derivatives on its balance sheet at fair value with changes in the values of these derivatives reflected in the statements of operations as “Gain (loss) on derivative liabilities.”  These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 and are disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative Liabilities.
 
ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 825-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:  Level 1   – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;   Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and   Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company’s Level 3 liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities associated with the November 4, 2008 note.  At September 30, 2009, all of the Company’s derivative liabilities were categorized as Level 3 fair value assets. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
 
Level 3 Valuation Techniques
 
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.  Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.  We have valued the convertible note that contains down round provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation consultant, for which management understands the methodologies. This model incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of July 1, 2009 and September 30, 2009.   The fair value of the derivatives as of July 1, 2009 upon implementation of ASC 815-40-15 was estimated by management to be $495,912.  As part of implementing ASC 815-40-14 the Company adjusted accumulated deficit by $162,643 and additional paid in capital by $212,184.  The fair value of the derivatives as of September 30, 2009 was estimated by management to be $575,401.
 
The foregoing assumptions will be reviewed quarterly and are subject to change based primarily on management’s assessment of the probability of the events described occurring. Accordingly, changes to these assessments could materially affect the valuation.
 
10

 
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative Liabilities:
 
   
As of September 30, 2009
 
    Fair Value Measurements Using  
   
Carrying Value
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Derivative Liabilities
 
$
575,401
     
     
   
$
575,401
   
$
575,401
 
Total Derivative Liabilities
 
$
575,401
     
     
   
$
575,401
   
$
575,401
 

The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the first quarter of 2009:
 
   
Fair Value Measurements Using Level 3 Inputs
       
   
Derivative Liabilities
   
Totals
 
Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2009
  $ 495,912     $ 495,912  
Total Gains or Losses (realized/unrealized) Included in Net Loss
    79,489       79,489  
Purchases, Issuances and Settlements
           
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
           
Ending Balance at March 31, 2009
  $ 575,401     $ 575,401  

Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies
 
Contingency
Certain default clauses related to the various agreements discussed in Note 4 would result in a change of control of the board of directors.  Certain debt holders would have the option to appoint independent members to the board under such default.
 
11


License agreement
 
The Company has a License agreement with William Marsh Rice University whereby minimum royalty payments which are calculated based on sales volume must be made starting in August 2010. This agreement can be terminated by Rice if certain financial and other conditions are not fulfilled by Solterra.  In July 2009 the Company  completed a license agreement with The University of Arizona whereby minimum royalty payments are calculated based on sales volume must be made starting in January 2011.
 
Development service agreements
 
In October 2008, the Company entered into a development service agreement with a major university to optimize the printing process of solar cells. The agreement is for the period October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009 with an option for two additional years of services.  The table below summarizes these financial commitments under this agreement.  The Company also has a development service agreement with Rice University regarding the manufacturing of quantum dots.  This agreement expires in January 2010.  These amounts are recorded as research and development expenses in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Summary
 
Fiscal
 
Services
   
Lease
   
License
       
Year
 
agreement
   
agreement
   
agreements
   
Total
 
2010
  $ 360,000     $ 409     $ -     $ 360,409  
2011
    -       -       204,450       204,450  
2012
    -       -       598,250       598,250  
2013
    -       -       1,946,000       1,946,000  
2014
    -       -       3,938,600       3,938,600  
Thereafter
    -       -       3,938,600       3,938,600  
                                 
Total
  $ 360,000     $ 409     $ 10,625,900     $ 10,986,309  

Note 7.  Warrants
 
The Company issued 1,000,000 common stock warrants on June 1, 2009.  The warrants have not been exercised at September 30, 3009.  The Company has attributed $34,148 to the warrant value using the Black Scholes option price model.
 
Note 8.  Subsequent events
 
Stock options issued
 
In October 2009 the Board authorized the formation of a stock option plan to cover 7,500,000 shares. The Board also approved the granting of fully vested non-statutory stock options to purchase 1,000,000 shares, 600,000 shares, 500,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Mr. Squires, Robin Squires (our controller), Brian Lukian and David Doderer, respectively, exercisable over  a period of ten years at an exercise price of $.05 per share.
 
12

 
Warrants issued
 
In November 2009 the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares exercisable at $.10 per share through October 31, 2014 for an extension of the Standstill Agreement. These Warrants also contain cashless exercise provisions in the event that there is no current registration statement effective at the time of exercise.
 
Common Stock
 
In November 2009, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Steven Posner and Oceanus Capital LLC pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 3,000,000 restricted shares in exchange for certain introductions made by them to the Company and various other related services.
 
In November 2009, the Company entered into a business development and public relation consulting contract with Sound Capital, Inc. This contract is for a period of one year and requires the Company to issue 3,000,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to the consultant upon the execution of the agreement and an additional 1,000,000 free trading shares to the consultant on or before February 12, 2010. The agreement may be terminated for cause or convenience upon 30 days prior written notice.
 
In November 2009 according to the provisions of the Convertible Debenture agreement the Company elected to issue 843,674 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock to pay for accrued interest on the debentures of $60,000.
 
Item 2.  Management’s Plan of Operation

This Form 10-Q contains " forward-looking statements " relating to us which represent our current expectations or beliefs, including statements concerning our operations, performance, financial condition and growth.  For this purpose, any statement contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as " may ", " anticipation ", " intend ", " could ", " estimate ", or " continue " or the negative or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as that term is defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, the forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those projected. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by the Company are not guarantees of future performance and those actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.  Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: well-established competitors who have substantially greater financial resources and longer operating histories, regulatory delays or denials, ability to compete as a start-up company in a highly competitive market, and access to sources of capital.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our Form 10-K filed November 12, 2009 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.  Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.  The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-Q should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear herein.  The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed here.
 
13


The financial information furnished herein has not been audited by an independent accountant; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (only consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2009 have been included.

Business Overview
 
Solterra   is a start-up solar technology and quantum dot manufacturing firm which was founded by Stephen Squires. Mr. Squires and our other officers and directors bring to us a large degree of experience in developing innovative technology, and commercializing high technology products.  We perceive an opportunity to acquire a significant amount of both quantum dot and solar photovoltaic market share by commercializing a low cost quantum dot processing technology and a low cost quantum dot based third generation photovoltaic technology/solar cell, pursuant to an exclusive license agreement with William Marsh Rice University (“Rice University” or “Rice”).  Our objective is for Hague to become the first bulk manufacture of high quality tetrapod quantum dots and for Solterra to be the first solar cell manufacturer to be able to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
 
Competitors are pursuing different nanotechnological approaches to developing solar cells, but the general idea is the same for all. When light hits an atom in a semiconductor, those photons of light with lots of energy can push an electron out of its nice stable orbital around the atom. The electron is then free to move from atom to atom, like the electrons in a piece of metal when it conducts electricity.  Using nano-size bits of semiconductor embedded in a conductive plastic maximizes the chance that an electron can escape the nanoparticle and reach the conductive plastic before it is "trapped" by another atom that has also been stripped of an electron. Once in the plastic, the electron can travel through wires connecting the solar cell to an electronic device. It can then wander back to the nanocrystal to join an atom that has a positive charge, which scientifically is called electron hole recombination.
 
A quantum dot solar cell typically uses a thin layer of quantum dot semiconductor material, rather than silicon chips, to convert sunlight into electricity. Quantum Dots, also known as nanocrystals, measure near one billionth of an inch and are a non-traditional type of semiconductor. Management believes that they can be used as an enabling material across many industries and that quantum dots are unparalleled in versatility and flexible in form.

Hague intends to design and manufacture solar cells using a proprietary thin film semiconductor technology that we believe will allow us to reduce our average solar cell manufacturing costs and be extremely competitive in this market. Hague will be one of the first companies to integrate non-silicon quantum dot thin film technology into high volume low cost production using proprietary technologies.  Our objective is to become one of the first solar module manufacturers to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, Europe and Asia. Management believes that the manufacture of our thin film quantum dot solar cells can introduce a cost effective disruptive technology that can help accelerate the conversion from a fossil fuel dependent energy infrastructure to one based on renewable, carbon-neutral energy sources. We believe that our proposed products also can be a part of the solution to greenhouse gases and global warming.
 
Plan of Reorganization, Recent Financing and Change in Control

On November 4, 2008, the Company closed on an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization by and among Hague Corp. (the “Company”), Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc. (“Solterra”), the shareholders of Solterra and Gregory Chapman as “Indemnitor” (the “Agreement”), which resulted in Solterra becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Chapman cancelled 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company owned by him and issued a general release in favor of the Company terminating its obligations to repay Mr. Chapman monies owed to him.

In accordance with the Agreement, the Company issued 41,250,000 shares of its Common Stock to the former stockholders of Solterra. Certain existing stockholders of the Company in consideration of Solterra and its shareholders completing the transaction, issued to the Company a Promissory Note in the amount of $3,500,000 due and payable on or before January 15, 2009, through the payment of cash or, with the consent of the Company, the cancellation of up to 12,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of the Company owned by them.  As of the filing date of the Form 10-Q, this note is in default and the Company has made demand for payment and is considering all legal options.
 
14


On November 4, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, Debenture, Security Agreement, Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement, Escrow Agreement, Stock Pledge Agreement and other related transactional documents (the “Transaction Documents”) to obtain $1,500,000 in gross proceeds from three non-affiliated parties (collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Lenders”) in exchange for 3,525,000 restricted shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Restricted Shares”) and Debentures in the principal amount aggregating $1,500,000. Each Debenture has a term of three years maturing on November 4, 2011 bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum and is prepayable by the Company at anytime without penalty, subject to the Debenture holders’ conversion rights. Each Debenture is convertible at the option of each Lender into the Company’s Common Stock (the “Debenture Shares”, which together with the Restricted Shares shall collectively be referred to as the “Securities”) at a conversion price of $.2667 per share (the “Conversion Price”).  The Registration Rights Agreement requires the Company to register the resale of the Securities within certain time limits and to be subject to certain penalties in the event the Company fails to timely file the Registration Statement, fails to obtain an effective Registration Statement or, once effective, to maintain an effective Registration Statement until the Securities are saleable pursuant to Rule 144 without volume restriction or other limitations on sale. The Debentures are secured by the assets of the Company and are guaranteed by Solterra as the Company’s subsidiary. In the event the Debentures are converted in their entirety, the Company would be required to issue and aggregate of 5,624,297 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to anti-dilution protection for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, reclassifications and sale of the Company’s Common Stock a price below the Conversion Price.  Certain changes of control or fundamental transactions such as a merger or consolidation with another company could cause an event of default under the Transaction .

Standstill Agreement

         On June 1, 2009, the Company and its Debenture Holders entered into a Standstill Agreement which provided for a 120-day standstill period pursuant to which the Debenture Holders would not exercise their rights under the Debentures, security agreements, guarantee, pledge agreement and other related “Transaction Documents.” In October 2009 by separate agreement, the Standstill Period was extended by the Debenture Holders through the close of business on December 1, 2009. The following is a summary of some of the material provisions of the Standstill Agreement:
 
·  
The Debenture Holders received warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Hague’s Common Stock, exercisable at $.25 per share over a period of 18 months together with cashless exercise provisions in the event no registration statement is effective at the time of exercise. Of the 1,000,000 warrants, the Debenture Holders assigned 175,000 warrants and 75,000 warrants to Isaac Horton and Richard Patton, respectively. Messrs. Horton and Patton served as directors of Hague in accordance with the Debenture Holders’ right to appoint two members to the Board of Directors. Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares exercisable at $.10 per share through October 31, 2014 were issued for an extension of the Standstill Agreement. These Warrants also contain cashless exercise provisions in the event that there is no current registration statement effective at the time of exercise.

·  
Certain stockholders of the Company were to exchange up to 2,350,000 shares of free trading shares for restricted shares of Hague’s Common Stock.

·  
The Company would seek to raise additional financing either in Hague or in Solterra. If the financing was in Solterra and at least $2,000,000 was raised, then the Debenture Holders would have the right to have Hague assign its Debenture obligation to Solterra and to permit the Debenture Holders to convert their indebtedness into Solterra Common Stock at a 25% discount to terms of the private placement offering. As of November 20, 2009, no additional equity financing has been raised by the Company.
 
15

 
·  
Isaac Horton shall resign from Hague’s Board. The Debenture Holders may replace Mr. Horton with David Skriloff.  On November 12, 2009, Mr. Horton resigned from the Board.

·  
Upon Hague’s receipt of $250,000 of financing, Hague has agreed to obtain directors and officer’s liability insurance and agree to maintain same for at least three years and to indemnify Mr. Skriloff to the fullest extent provided by Nevada law should he agree to join the Board.

·  
On or before Solterra’s acceptance of any private financing, Solterra shall assign its license agreement with Rice University to Hague. Simultaneously, Hague shall grant Solterra the exclusive worldwide right under the Rice license agreement to purchase the quantum dots for solar purposes, including the right to grant sublicenses. The Company shall obtain the written permission of Rice University to accomplish the foregoing. Hague shall be the sole supplier of the quantum dots to Solterra and to its sublicensees.  Solterra shall pay a licensing fee to Hague in an amount necessary to retire the Company’s Notes (principal and accrued but unpaid interest) in full (unless the Noteholders agree to have Solterra assume these obligations from Hague and convert into common stock of Solterra), plus the sum of $1.0 million.  It is understood that Solterra will be the solar sub and Hague shall produce and sell the quantum dots and shall have the right to grant sublicenses for all other purposes. During the Standstill Period and thereafter, except as otherwise provided, Hague shall not transfer and/or sell any of its assets without the express prior written consent of the Noteholders, unless the Notes have been repaid or converted. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit Hague or Solterra from licensing its intellectual property or selling its quantum dots in a business unrelated to solar to third parties in arm’s-length transactions.

·  
Upon conversion of the Noteholders’ Notes into Solterra common stock or the repayment of the Notes in full, the following shall occur: (i) all security interests, registration rights and other such rights and obligations of the Noteholders (as noteholders only and in no other capacity) shall be terminated, (ii) if elected Mr. Skriloff, shall resign from the Board of Directors of Hague, and (iii) the Noteholders, Hague and Solterra shall exchange general releases which shall pertain to all past actions of the Noteholders, as Noteholders, stockholders or security holders in Hague or Solterra, as the case may be.

·  
The Hague Board shall agree to hold board meetings no less frequently than monthly, until the completion of the Private Offering and/or grants of at least $2.0 million. It is further agreed that Hague shall adopt a “Directors Manual: Public Corporation Governance and Guidelines,” which includes a Code of Business Ethics, in the form customarily adopted by smaller public companies and comply with all applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

·  
Upon the completion of Solterra’s financing efforts, it will endeavor to become an independent public entity through a self-directed offering and the following actions would occur: Solterra’s Board would be expanded to include additional directors. Mr. Squires would remain Chief Executive Officer of one of these two companies with a new Chief Executive Officer to be identified and hired on commercially reasonable terms to run the other company. Mr. Squires would serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company in which he is Chief Executive Officer and he would serve as a director of the other company. In the interim, until a new Chief Executive Officer is found for the company in which he chooses not to serve as Chief Executive Officer, he will serve as interim Chief Executive Officer until his replacement is hired.

·  
The provisions of the Standstill Agreement (except as otherwise provided therein) shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect ab initio, as if this agreement never took place or upon the happening of one of the following events of default: (a) the entry of an order for relief against Hague or Solterra (or equivalent thereof) in any case under title 11 of the United States Code (or in connection with any case or proceeding involving Hague or Solterra under any state or federal insolvency law, (b) if Hague or Solterra fails to make any required payments, under the terms of its agreements with Rice University or Arizona State University, but only where either university notifies Hague or Solterra that it is in default and that all opportunities to cure the default have past, or (c) upon a material default (breach) of the Standstill Agreement by Hague or Solterra and after being given written notice of such default and at least five business days opportunity to cure the default.
 
 
16

 
Plan of Operation

Since November 4, 2008, the Company is executing its business plan as follows:  

Scale up Quantum Dot Production by   applying proprietary technology licensed from Rice University for our quantum dot synthesis process. This licensed technology enables Solterra to produce the highly desirable CdSe tetrapod quantum dots at a cost savings of greater than 50% compared to competing suppliers, and will organically supply Solterra’s requirements for quantum dots for its solar cells. Additionally, Solterra will market these Q-Dots through various existing supply channels into various markets, including but not limited to medical diagnostics and printed electronics. The initial pilot scale up will take place at or near Rice University in Houston, Texas. The staff there will include one post doctorate, Professor Michael Wong the inventor of the technology and our Vice President in charge of quantum dot commercialization David Doderer. Following initial proof of scale production, the commercial production of quantum dots will likely be consolidated in a purpose built facility in Phoenix, Arizona, adjoining the proposed solar cell production line.

Initiate scaled manufacturing of tetrapod quantum dots, based in part on technology licensed from William H. Marsh Rice University, and building on continued research.  Planning includes the implementation of one or more Solterra owned mini-batch lines for quantum dot conjugation and quality control studies, as well as a pilot line based on outcomes of collaboration with Access2Flow, an advanced flow chemistry consortium based in the Netherlands.  The design of the pilot line is intended such that the initial target output of the line, at approximately one kilogram per day, can be further scaled at least by an order of magnitude to 1,000 grams per day in 2010.  The output of the tetrapod quantum dots manufacturing will be used for Solterra’s quantum dot solar cells as well as stand-alone sales into the biomedical research fields and to third party developers of quantum dot products such as displays, memory and computer and consumer electronics.

Fabricate solar cells and optimize the performance of solar cells based on a blend of a suitable conjugated polymer and CdSe quantum dots (QDs).  The aim is to invest our best efforts to demonstrate and scale up production of low cost quantum dot solar cells having peak efficiency of greater than 6%. The efficiency of solar cells is the electrical power it puts out as percentage of the power in incident sunlight. Within the photovoltaic market, cell pricing and peak efficiency are key benchmarks for consumers in the decision for system selection and installation. The design and manufacture of Solterra's quantum dot based solar cells is projected to allow for the conversion of sunlight into usable electricity at a combination of efficiencies and cell cost at a very low "cents per kilowatt-hour" rate. This work is expected to be accomplished on site at the Arizona State University labs where we also maintain our corporate offices. The staff there includes three post doctorates three undergraduates, our Chief Science Officer, Professor Ghassan Jabbour and our CEO, Stephen Squires.

Continue to develop and characterize the Quantum Dot Solar Cell product; moving towards pilot proof line for solar cells and leading to high throughput print line ultimately capable of yearly solar cell output near gigawatt range. Target cell efficiencies are 6% within one year, 10% within 2 years and greater than 20% within five years.  Coupled within cell cost per watt decreasing below $1.00/Watt, we intend to pursue initial product sales in late 2010 with significant increases in 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 30, 2009 the Company had a working capital deficit of $1,496,344.  The Company has been in the development stage since inception. As a result, the Company has relied on financing through the issuance of common stock and a convertible debenture as well as advances from a director shareholder as well as employees wages being accrued but not paid.
 
17

 
The Company is aggressively seeking additional financing; however, no agreements for additional financing have been received and the Company cannot provide any assurance that additional funding will be available to finance our operations on acceptable terms in order to enable us to complete our new plan of operations.  If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our new plan of operations, then our stockholders may lose their entire investment in the Company.

We expect to run at a loss for at least the next twelve months. Certain existing stockholders of the Company in consideration of Solterra and its shareholders completing the transaction, issued to the Company a Promissory Note in the amount of $3,500,000 due and payable on or before January 15, 2009, through the payment of cash or, with the consent of the Company, the cancellation of up to 12,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of the Company owned by them.  As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, this Note has not been paid. We have demanded payment on the Note of $3,500,000 or the cancellation of the 12,000,000 shares. We are prepared to take all corporate legal actions against the obligors of the Note.  We can provide no assurances that a successful resolution of this matter will occur.
 
Statement of operations – September 30, 2009

General and administrative expenses

During the three months ended September 30, 2009 the Company incurred $197,448 of general and administrative expenses compared to the $35,462 recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2008.  The increase of $161,986 is attributed to the fact the Company was not operational at September 30, 2008.  The Company became operational after the financing was received in November 2008.  Included in the expenses for the current quarter wages were of $135,000, license maintenance costs of $25,489, legal and audit of $17,070, corporate expense of $2,005, office expenses of $11,973, travel expense of $4,608 and amortization of furniture and equipment of $1,303.  General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 included wages of $15,000, moving expense of $7,614, office expense of $6,545, travel expense of $5,218 and insurance of $1,085.

Research and development expenses.

Research and development expenses of $155,000 were incurred per an agreement to a major university to optimize the printing process of solar cells.  A further $30,473 of expenses were recorded for the period ended September 30, 2009 to another major university for the development of the continuous batch production of the Company’s proprietary Quantum Dots.  There were no development costs incurred in the period ending September 30, 2008.
 
Amortization of convertible debenture discount

The convertible debenture discount of $1,500,000 is being amortized over the term of the 36 month term of the debenture using the effective interest method.  The debenture was issued on November 4, 2008.  Amortization recorded for the period ended September 30, 2009 was $39,363.  The amortized balance of the discount at September 30, 2009 is $1,366,282 resulting in the convertible debenture value on the balance sheet net of the discount $133,718.  At September 30, 2008 this account did not exist.
 
18

 
Amortization of deferred finance cost
 
This amount relates to the $315,000 of expenses associated with the $1,500,000 convertible debenture financing raised in November 2008.  The deferred financing cost is being amortized using the effective interest method over the thirty-six month life of the debenture.  Amortization recorded for the period ended September 30, 2009 was $26,250.  At September 30, 2008 this account did not exist.
 
Interest expense on the convertible debenture

This amount relates to the 8% interest associated with the $1,500,000 convertible debenture issued in November 2008. Interest expense recorded for the period ended September 30, 2009 was $30,000.  According to the provisions of the Convertible Debenture agreement the Company has elected to issue shares of the Company’s Stock to pay accrued interest on the debentures.  In March 2009 the Company issued 506,493 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock to pay $39,000 of accrued interest.  In November 2009 the Company issued 843,674 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock to pay $60,000 of accrued interest.  There was no interest for the period ended September 30, 2008 as the debenture was issued after this date.

Cash Flow
 
During the period ended September 30, 2009, cash was used in operations of $3,848.  During this period the Company received proceeds on disposal of furniture and equipment of $3,848.  These changes resulted in no change in the cash position from the year ended June 30, 2009.  The opening cash at June 30, 2009 was nil,and the closing balance at September 30, 2009 was also nil.
 
Off-balance sheet arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect our liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.

Item 3.  Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our short term money market investments. The Company does not have any financial instruments held for trading or other speculative purposes and does not invest in derivative financial instruments, interest rate swaps or other investments that alter interest rate exposure. The Company does not have any credit facilities with variable interest rates.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

The Company maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in giving us reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
19


We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
In our Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2009.
 
Management did however identify a significant deficiency; a significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the registrant’s financial reporting.  Currently we do not have sufficient in-house expertise in US GAAP reporting.  Instead, we rely very much on the expertise and knowledge of external financial advisors in US GAAP conversion.  External financial advisors have helped prepare and review the consolidated financial statements.  Although we have not identified any material errors with our financial reporting or any material weaknesses with our internal controls, no assurances can be given that there are no such material errors or weaknesses existing.  To remediate this situation, we are seeking to recruit experienced professionals to augment and upgrade our financial staff to address issues of timeliness and completeness in US GAAP financial reporting.  In addition, we do not believe we have sufficient documentation with our existing financial processes, risk assessment and internal controls.  We plan to work closely with external financial advisors to document the existing financial processes, risk assessment and internal controls systematically.
 
We believe that the remediation measures we are taking, if effectively implemented and maintained, will remediate the significant deficiency discussed above.
 
Except as described above, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item 1A.
 
Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a)  
From July 1, 2008 to November 12, 2009, we had the following sales of unregistered Common Stock.

 
Date of Sale
 
Title of Security
 
Number Sold
 
Consideration Received and Description of Underwriting or Other Discounts to Market Price or Convertible Security, Afforded to Purchasers
 
Exemption from Registration Claimed
 
If Option, Warrant or Convertible Security, terms of exercise or conversion
Nov. 4, 2008
 
Common Stock
 
41,250,000
Shares
 
 
Share exchange pursuant to Plan of Reorganization; no commissions paid.
 
 
Section 4(2) and/or
Rule 506.
 
Not applicable.
Nov. 4, 2008
 
Common Stock and
Debentures
 
 
3,525,000
shares and
$1,500,000
Debentures
 
 
$1,500,000; $150,000 of finder’s fees
 
Section 4(2).
 
Notes are convertible at $.2667 per share.
March, 2009
 
Common Stock
 
506,493
Shares
 
Shares issued in exchange for interest of $30,667; no commissions paid.
 
Section 4(2) and/or
Rule 506.
 
Not applicable.
 
June, 2009
and November
2009
 
Common Stock
Warrants
 
 
3,000,000
Shares
 
Warrants issued as part
of a Standstill Agreement;
no commissions paid.
 
 
Section 4(2) and/or
Rule 506.
 
 
 
 
1,000,000 Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share over a period of 18 months and 2,000,000 Warrants are exercisable at $.10 per share through
October 31, 2014.
 
November ,
2009
 
Common Stock
 
843,674
 
Shares issued in exchange
For interest of $60,000;
no commissions paid.
 
Section 4(2) and/or
Rule 506.
 
Not applicable.
 
November,
2009
 
Common Stock
 
 
3,000,000
 
 
Shares issued for services
rendered; no commissions paid
 
 
Section 4(2) and/or
Rule 506.
 
 
Not applicable.
 
(b) 
Rule 463 of the Securities Act is not applicable to the Company.
(c)
In the three  months ended September 30, 2009, there were no repurchases by the Company of its Common Stock.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.   None.

Item 5.  Other Information.    None.
 
20

 
Item 6.  Exhibits

The following exhibits are all previously filed in connection with our Form 8-K filed November 10, 2008, unless otherwise noted.
 
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 15, 2008, by and among Hague Corp., Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc., the shareholders of Solterra and Greg Chapman, as Indemnitor.
   
4.1 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of November 4, 2008.
   
4.2  Form of Security Agreement dated November 4, 2008.
   
4.3
Form of Subsidiary Guarantee dated November 4, 2008.
   
4.4
Form of Stock Pledge Agreement dated November 4, 2008.
   
4.5
Form of Debenture-- MKM Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd.
   
4.6
Form of Debenture.-- MKM SP1, LLC.
   
4.7
Form of Debenture-- Steven Posner Irrevocable Trust u/t/a Dated 06/17/65.
   
4.8
Form of Escrow Agreement.
   
4.9
Form of Amended Waiver and Consent.
   
4.10 Form of Registration Rights Agreement.
   
4.11 Standstill Agreement dated June 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009).
   
4.12 Amended Standstill Agreement dated June 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).
   
4.13 Extension of Standstill Agreement dated October 29, 2009(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).
   
10.1
License Agreement by and between William Marsh Rice University and Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc. dated August 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for its Quarter year ended March 31, 2009 filed May 15, 2009).
   
10.2
Letter dated October 2, 2008 from Rice University amending the License Agreement contained in Exhibit 10.1.
   
10.3 Agreement with Arizona State University executed by ASU on October 8, 2008 and executed by Solterra on September 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).
   
10.4 Letters dated November 5, 2009 and November 9, 2009 amending Rice University Agreement (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed  November 12, 2009).
   
10.5 Consulting Agreement between Steven Posner, Oceanus Capital and the issuer (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).
   
10.6 Consulting Agreement between Sound Capital Inc and the issuer dated November 12, 2009 *
   
10.7 License Agreement between The University of Arizona and the issuer dated July 2009.*
   
21.1
Subsidiaries of Registrant listing state of incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed on November 12, 2009).
   
31(a)
 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Chief Executive Officer *
   
31(b)
 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Chief Financial Officer *
   
32(a)
 Section 1350 Certification – Chief Executive Officer *
   
32(b)
 Section 1350 Certification – Chief Financial Officer *
____________
*  Filed herewith.
 
 
 


21

 
SIGNATURES
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
HAGUE CORP.
 
       
November 23, 2009   
By:
/s/ Stephen Squires    
 
   
Stephen Squires
 
   
Chief Executive Officer
 
       
 
     
       
November 23, 2009 
By:
/s/ Brian Lukian    
 
   
Brian Lukian
 
   
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
22
 

Exhibit 10.6
 
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
SOLTERRA RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
AND
SOUND CAPITAL, INC.
 

THIS CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT ( hereafter referred to as the “Agreement”) effective as of the 12th  day of November, 2009 by and between SOLTERRA RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware (hereinafter referred to as “HGUE”), and Sound Capital, Inc. a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York (hereafter referred to as “Consultant”).

In consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and on the
Terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows:

1.  
Provision of services-   Consultant shall provide to HGUE the following services:

(a)  
To the extent reasonably required in the conduct of the business of HGUE to place at
The disposal of HGUE its judgment and to provide business development services to
HGUE including, but not limited to:

(i)  
Advice and counsel with respect to business development and marketing plans;
(ii)  
Assistance in the development of public relations plans and media relations;
(iii)  
Advice with respect to short and long term strategic plans;
(iv)  
Other related services deemed necessary and requested by HGUE
(Collectively, the “Services”);                                                     
(v)  
Securing additional financing;
(vi)  
Assist in the retention of brokerage firms for Public Offerings;
(vii)  
Private Placements;
(viii)  
Debt Restructuring;
(ix)  
Assist in writing research reports;
(x)  
Assist in getting additional market makers and/or brokerage firms to make markets in HGUE;
(xi)  
Assist in putting out and writing News Releases;
(xii)  
Introductions to brokerage firms;
(xiii)  
Involve company in conferences that will give it increased exposure to other industry professionals.

(b)  
Consultant agrees to use its best efforts in the furnishing of the Services and for this
Purpose.  Consultant shall at all times maintain or keep available an adequate            
Organization under this Agreement.
                                                                        



                                                     
2. 
Compensation
     
HGUE agrees and shall compensate Consultant in consideration for his performance Of the Service by issuing 3,000,000 (three million) restricted shares of the Common Stock of HGUE.   An additional 1,000,000 (one million) free trading shares will be issued on or before February 12 th , 2010.
 
3. 
Terms and Agreement
 
Agreement and the compensation to be paid hereunder.                            \
Written above and shall remain in force and effect for a period of (12) months, unless earlier terminated by either party, for cause or convenience or other obligations, at its or his option upon 30 (days) written notice.
   
4. 
Confidentiality of Information and Documents
 
In the event that HGUE shall submit Information and/or documents to Consultant in order to permit him to perform the services Required under this Agreement, Consultant shall keep such information in the strictest confidence using the same degree of care that Consultant uses in safe guarding his own confidential information both during and after completion of the Services under this Agreement and for a period of ten (10) years after the completion of the Services, unless it shall receive from HGUE the consent of HGUE in writing to disclose it.  However, nothing herein shall be interpreted as preventing Consultant from disclosing and/or using said information or documents which (I) are already rightfully in the possession of Consultant without obligation of confidence, but were not obtained directly or indirectly from HGUE its affiliates; or (ii) are independently developed by Consultant not as part of the Services rendered or called for under the terms of this Agreement; or (iii) are or become available to the general public without breach of this Agreement; confidence, but who did not obtain them directly or indirectly from HGUE its affiliates; or (iv) are required to be disclosed pursuant to law or court order , or as may be authorized by HGUE.


5.
Liability of Consultant
 
In furnishing HGUE with the Services provided herein, neither Consultant nor any officer, director or agent thereof shall be liable to HGUE or its creditors for errors of judgement or for any matters, except for willful malfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of the Service or the reckless disregard of its obligation and duties under the terms of this Agreement. It is further agreed and understood that Consultant may rely upon information furnished to it by HGUE which Consultant reasonably believes to be accurate and reliable and that is provided herein, Consultant shall not be accountable for any loss suffered by HGUE by the reason of HGUE action or non-action on the basis of any device, recommendation or approval of Consultant, its partners, officers, directors, employees or agents as provided above.
 
6. 
Independent Contractor -
 
Execution of this Agreement in no way created, nor shall this Agreement be interpreted or construed as creating, an employment agency, partnership or joint venture relationship between HGUE and Consultant and it is understood that Consultant will be acting as an independent contractor.                 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
   


 
7.   Miscellaneous-                                

(a)  
OTHER ACTIVITIES OF CONSULTANT: HGUE recognizes that Consultant  now renders and may continue to render management and other advisory services  to other companies which may or may not have policies and conduct activities similar To those of HGUE.  Consultant shall be free to render advice and other services, and  HGUE hereby consents thereto.  Consultant shall not be required to devote its full time  And attention to the performance of the Services hereunder to HGUE, but shall only Devote so much of its time and attention as HGUE, Consultant mutually deems reasonable and necessary for such Services.

(b)  
CONTROL: Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to require HGUE to take any action contrary to its Certificate of Incorporation or by-laws, or any applicable statute Or regulation, or to deprive its Board of Directors of their responsibility for any control Of the conduct of the affairs of HGUE.
 
(c)  
This Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement between HGUE and Consultant relating to the Services performed, and no representations, promises, understandings, or agreements, oral or otherwise, not herein contained shall be of any force of effect.  No modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

(d)  
This agreement shall be governed by, and constructed in accordance with, the laws of The State of Florida.
                                                        
(e)  
In the event of any litigation between the parties to declare or reinforce any provision of This Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party, in addition to any other recovery and costs, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in such litigation, in both the trial and in the appellate courts.

(f)  
Consultant will at all times make known to all parties with whom he represents this investment the compensation being afforded to the Consultant under the terms of this agreement.

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives,  have signed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
 

 
Sound Capital, Inc.   
 
 
    Solterra Renewable Technologies Inc  
/s/ Richard Chancis
   
/s/ Stephen Squires
 
RICHARD CHANCIS 
   
STEPHEN SQUIRES    
 
PRESIDENT 
   
PRESIDENT
 
 
EXHIBIT 10.7
 
 
Exclusive Patent License Agreement
 
Between
 
The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona
 
And
 
Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc.

This license agreement (the “Agreement”) is made effective as of the Effective Date and is between The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University of Arizona , an Arizona body corporate with its principal campus in Tucson, Arizona 85721 (the “UNIVERSITY”), and Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc. , an Arizona Company with its principal place of business at 7700 South River Parkway, Tempe, AZ  85284 (“LICENSEE”).
 
AGREEMENT

The parties agree as follows:
 
BACKGROUND
 
Work at the UNIVERSITY has led to the creation of Technical Information and inventions claimed in Patent Rights as further defined below.
 
LICENSEE is interested in obtaining license to UNIVERSITY’s interest in valuable intangible property rights for creation, manufacture, use, production, distribution, and marketing of products and services from innovations represented by the Technical Information and Patent Rights and can provide a useful business environment for creating Licensed Products and practicing Licensed Method.  UNIVERSITY is willing to grant such rights so that Licensed Products are created and Licensed Method practiced so that the benefits of their availability are enjoyed by the public and a beneficial return to the UNIVERSITY is provided.
 
 
1.  DEFINITIONS
 
1.1   
"Change of Control" shall mean the assignment, or other transfer that effects the same however titled by LICENSEE, to a third party of this License between UA and LICENSEE.
 
1.2   
"Effective Date" shall be the last date of signature by authorized representatives of the two parties affirming acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
 
1.3  
“Field of Use” shall mean Organic Light-Emitting Diodes in printed electronic displays and all other printed electronic components.
 
1 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
1.4  
“Licensed Method” shall mean any method that:
 
1.4.a  
Is covered by Patent Rights, the use of which would constitute but for the license granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement, an infringement of any issued claim of Patent Rights (including, but not limited to, inducement or contributory infringement); or
 
1.4.b  
Incorporates or is created from access to Technical Information which has provided LICENSEE the time advantage of information and hence a springboard to the business activities of LICENSEE.
 
1.5  
 “Licensed Product” shall mean any product that:
 
1.5.a  
Is covered by Patent Right or is produced by the Licensed Method, to the extent that the production, use, or sale of such product would infringe an issued claim of Patent Rights (including, but not limited to, inducement or contributory infringement), but for the license granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement or that is produced by the Licensed Method; or
 
1.5.b  
Incorporates or is created from access to Technical Information which has provided LICENSEE the time advantage of information and hence a springboard to the business activities of LICENSEE.
 
1.6  
"Net Sales" shall mean the total of the gross invoice prices from the sale of Licensed Product or the performance of Licensed Method or Licensed Service by COMPANY, or a sublicensee, to any third parties for cash or other forms of consideration.  COMPANY may make the following deductions, at rates customary within the industry (if not already deducted from the gross invoice price), when calculating the total gross invoice prices:
 
1.6.a  
allowances actually paid and limited to rejections, returns, and prompt payment and volume discounts granted to customers of LICENSEE, or a sublicensee;
 
1.6.b  
freight, transportation, packing, and/or insurance charges actually paid associated with transportation;
 
1.6.c  
taxes based on sales when included in gross sales, but not taxes assessed on income derived from such sales; and
 
 
Where LICENSEE distributes Licensed Products for end use to itself or a sublicensee, for purposes other than research and development, then such distribution will be considered a sale at the list price normally charged to independent third parties, and UNIVERSITY will be entitled to collect royalty on such a sale in accordance with Article 3.  Subsequent distribution or sale of these Licensed Products from LICENSEE or sublicensee shall not be subject to additional royalties.
 
1.7  
“Patent Rights” shall mean U.S. Patent No. 7,015,052, issued on March 21, 2006, entitled "Screen-Printing Techniques for the Fabrication of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes."
 
1.8  
 “Prior Patent Costs” shall mean direct out of pocket costs incurred by UNIVERSITY for the perfection of Patent Rights prior to the Effective Date which currently total $9280.76.
 
2 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
1.9  
“Sublicensing Consideration” shall mean all consideration received by LICENSEE for the grant of a sublicense of any of the rights granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement, including but not limited to upfront license fees, minimum annual payments, license maintenance payments, milestone payments, royalty and equity interest in the acquirer above the fair market value of the interest transferred.  Sublicensing Consideration excludes Running Royalties and direct payments to LICENSEE for research projects advancing Licensed Product or Licensed Methods and detailed in advance by a research plan and commensurate budget.
 
1.10  
“Technical Information” shall mean UNIVERSITY's information and know-how represented by:
 
1.10.a  
the information content of items made available to LICENSEE under this Agreement in tangible form, including without limitation prototypes, documented processes or techniques, written procedures or methods, protocols, patent applications, software, data compilations or UNIVERSITY invention disclosure files as inventoried in Exhibit A or otherwise identified in this Agreement, whether provided prior to or after the Effective Date of this Agreement; or
 
1.10.b  
services by UNIVERSITY or UNIVERSITY employees acting as consultants with UNIVERSITY’s approval that teach or transfer to LICENSEE UNIVERSITY information associated with Article 1.10.a; or
 
1.10.c  
transfers of UNIVERSITY personnel to LICENSEE that teach or transfer to LICENSEE UNIVERSITY information associated with Article 1.10.a.
 
1.11  
“Territory” for Technical Information shall mean worldwide; and for Patent Rights shall mean those countries for which Patent Rights have been perfected and are being maintained in accordance with Article 5.
 
2.  GRANT/RETAINED RIGHTS
 
2.1  
License Grant – Patent Rights. UNIVERSITY grants to LICENSEE upon receipt of Prior Patent Costs and the License Issue Fee as set forth in Article 3, and LICENSEE accepts, an exclusive license to UNIVERSITY’s interest in valuable intangible property rights in Patent Rights to make, have made, import, have imported, use, market, sell, and distribute Licensed Product, and practice Licensed Method within the Field of Use and in the Territory.  These rights are specifically subject to Paragraphs 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 as well as the general terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.  This grant does not relinquish UNIVERSITY ownership in or rights to Technical Information or Patent Rights and does not grant, by implication or otherwise, any other rights to LICENSEE of any other technologies owned, invented, or discovered by UNIVERSITY, whether past, present, or future.
 
2.2  
License Grant – Technical Information. UNIVERSITY grants to LICENSEE upon receipt of Prior Patent Costs and the License Issue Fee as set forth in Article 3, and LICENSEE accepts, a nonexclusive license to Technical Information to make, have made, import, have imported, use, market, sell, and distribute Licensed Product, and practice Licensed Method within the Field of Use and in the Territory consistent with the purpose of this Agreement subject to the confidentiality provisions of Article 9.  These rights are specifically subordinate to any Patent Right and the need for a grant of rights thereto as well as subject to Paragraphs 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 and the general terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
 
3 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
2.3  
Sublicensing Grant. UNIVERSITY grants to LICENSEE as long as LICENSEE possesses an exclusive right to UNIVERSITY’s interest in Patent Rights under Paragraph 2.1 of this Agreement, and LICENSEE accepts, the nontransferrable right to issue to third parties sublicenses with respect to Licensed Product and Licensed Method within the scope of the grant of rights provided by UNIVERSITY to LICENSEE in Paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2.  Any and all sublicense agreements within the Field of Use granted by LICENSEE shall include all of the rights and obligations contained in this Agreement due UNIVERSITY, and, if applicable, due the United States Government.
 
2.4  
General Retained Rights. UNIVERSITY retains all other rights in Patent Rights and Technical Information not expressly granted LICENSEE.

2.5  
Specific Retained Rights. UNIVERSITY retains:
 
2.5.a  
For its research and educational purposes, the right to practice the inventions claimed in Patent Rights within the Field of Use and in the Territory including without limitation UNIVERSITY's right to make, use, have made, have used, import or have imported the inventions and to practice Licensed Methods; and
 
2.5.b  
The right to maintain and sublicense these same rights in Paragraph 2.5.a solely for research and educational purposes to other institutions of higher education or non-profit research institutions.
 
2.5.c  
Nothing in this Agreement limits the right of UNIVERSITY to publish any and all results and technical data resulting from research performed by UNIVERSITY, including, but not limited to, research relating to the Licensed Products, Licensed Method, or Technical Information.
 
2.6  
Government License. The development of Technical Information and Patent Rights was sponsored in part by the U.S. Government, and as a consequence, this Agreement is subject to overriding obligations to the Federal Government under rights and limitations of Public Laws (PL) 96-517 and 98-620 and implementing regulations including 35 USC §§200-211 and 37 CFR Part 401 (“U.S. Government Rights”), as well as the royalty-free provisions of Paragraph 3.5 and the manufacturing statement of Paragraph 13.5.
 
 
3.
FEES, ROYALTIES AND PATENT COSTS
 
3.1  
Royalties.   In partial consideration for the rights granted herein, LICENSEE shall pay UNIVERSITY on the schedule described in Article 4 the following royalties:
 
3.1.a  
Running Royalties: Royalties based on Net Sales (the “Running Royalties”) of:
 
3.1.a.i  
Two Percent (2.0 %) of Net Sales of Licensed Products for Non-Display Electronic Component applications; and
 
3.1.a.ii  
Two and one-half Percent (2.5%) of Net Sales of Licensed Products for Printed Electronic Displays
 
4 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
3.1.b  
Minimum Annual Royalty:   A minimum royalty according to the following schedule.
 
3.1.b.i  
The Minimum Annual Royalty payment will be creditable against Royalties due in each respective royalty year, July 1 to June 30th following the due date.

Due Date                                                       Minimum Royalty Due
 
January 1, 2011                                                        $25,000
 
June 30, 2011                                                            $50,000
 
June 30, 2012                                                            $125,000
 
Each June 30 of every year thereafter                  $200,000
 
3.1.b.ii  
The Annual Minimum Royalties will be adjusted by the cumulative percentage change in the CPI-W Consumer Price Index between July  and the June preceding the date on which the payment in question is payable.
 
3.1.c  
Royalties Due From Sublicenses:   For each sublicense granted by LICENSEE, LICENSEE shall pay UNIVERSITY on the schedule described in Article 4 the following royalties :
 
3.1.c.i  
 Net Sales by Sublicensees: Running Royalties as set forth in Article 3.1.a.
 
3.1.c.ii  
Sublicensee Minimum Annual Royalty: Minimum royalties as set forth in 3.1.b.
 
3.1.c.iii  
Sublicensing Consideration : Fifteen Percent (15%) of Sublicensing Consideration earned in any period.
 
3.2  
Prior Patent Costs:   In partial consideration for the rights granted herein, LICENSEE shall pay any outstanding Prior Patent Costs upon execution of this Agreement.
 
3.3  
Patent Costs:   In partial consideration for the rights granted herein, LICENSEE shall pay within sixty (60) days of receipt of the UNIVERSTY invoice all costs present and future, incurred in maintaining Patent Rights.
 
3.4  
License Fee:   A License Fee of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) shall be paid within 90 days of execution of the Agreement.
 
3.5  
Early Termination Fee:   For termination prior to June 30, 2012, Licensee will pay UA an early termination fee of $75,000.
 
3.6  
Change of Control:   The lesser of $350,000 or 3.0% of the monetary value of all consideration from a transaction involving the sale or assignment or effective transfer of the license agreement to any third party is due upon execution of the Change of Control.
 
3.7  
U.S. Government.    If a Government License exists according to Paragraph 2.6 and if LICENSEE maintains evidence of sales to the U.S. government under U.S. Government Rights, then no royalties may be collected nor need be paid on Licensed Products sold to or Licensed Method performed for the U.S. Government or any agency thereof, as provided for in that license to the government.
 
5 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
4.  PAYMENTS, REPORTS, RECORD KEEPING AND INSPECTIONS
 
4.1  
Timing of Royalty Payments. LICENSEE shall pay all royalties under Paragraph 3.1 quarterly and within thirty (30) days of the end of each calendar quarter.  Each such payment shall be for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
 
4.2  
Sublicense Reporting.   LICENSEE shall notify the UNIVERSITY of each sublicense granted hereunder.  LICENSEE shall collect and pay all fees and royalties due UNIVERSITY and guarantee all such payments due from sublicensees.  LICENSEE shall monitor sublicensees and assure license terms are met, appropriate records are kept and product quality is equal to or greater than that required by this Agreement.
 
4.3  
Quarterly Royalty Reports. After the first commercial sale of Licensed Product or performance of Licensed Method, LICENSEE shall provide UNIVERSITY with an annual written report within thirty (30) days of December 31 of each calendar year indicating:
 
4.3.a  
Quantity of Licensed Product produced or Licensed Method performed in each location, relevant information on maintaining Licensed Products quality, and supplies of Licensed Products held by LICENSEE and sublicensee(s); and
 
4.3.b  
Summary of Licensed Product and Licensed Method gross sales and Net Sales for both LICENSEE and sublicensee(s); and
 
4.3.c  
The royalties due, including the method used to calculate royalties, the exchange rates used, if applicable, as well as any reductions due to sales to the U.S. Government; and
 
4.3.d  
An accounting of the quantity of Licensed Product sold and Licensed Method performed by LICENSEE and each sublicensee(s), including a summary of domestic and international distribution on which royalties are payable.
 
4.4  
Semi-Annual Pre-commercial effort reporting. Beginning December 2009 and continuing annually thereafter, LICENSEE shall submit to UNIVERSITY a progress report within thirty (30) days of December 31 covering LICENSEE’s activities related to the development and testing of all Licensed Products and Licensed Methods and the obtaining of the governmental approvals necessary for production, marketing, distribution and sale.  Progress reports are required for each Licensed Product and Licensed Method until the first commercial sale of that Licensed Product occurs in the United States. Such reports shall again be required if commercial sales of such Licensed Product or performance of Licensed Method are suspended or discontinued.  Progress reports submitted hereunder shall include, but are not limited to, the following information:
 
4.4.a  
Summary of work completed
 
4.4.b  
Key scientific discoveries
 
6 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
4.4.c  
Summary of work in progress
 
4.4.d  
Current schedule of anticipated events or milestones
 
4.4.e  
Market plans for introduction of Licensed Products and Licensed Methods
 
4.4.f  
A summary of resources (dollar value) spent in the reporting period.
 
4.5  
Payment in U.S. Dollars. Payments hereunder shall be made in U.S. dollars in the United States.  If Licensed Products are sold or Licensed Method is performed for monies other than United States dollars, LICENSEE shall first determine the earned royalty in the currency of the country in which Licensed Products were sold or Licensed Method was practiced and then convert the amount into equivalent United States funds, using the exchange rate quoted in the Wall Street Journal on the last business day of the reporting period.
 
4.6  
No Reduction by Taxes or Other Charges. Royalties earned on sales occurring in any country outside the United States may not be reduced by any taxes, fees, or other charges imposed by the government of such country on the payment of royalty income.  LICENSEE is responsible for all bank transfer charges.  Notwithstanding this, all payments made by LICENSEE in fulfillment of UNIVERSITY’s own tax liability in any particular country will be credited against earned royalties or fees due UNIVERSITY for that country.
 
4.7  
Prompt Remittance on Foreign Sales. If at any time, legal restrictions prevent the prompt remittance of royalties by LICENSEE from any country where Licensed Products are sold or Licensed Method is practiced, LICENSEE shall convert the amount owed to UNIVERSITY into United States funds and shall pay UNIVERSITY directly from its U.S. source of funds for as long as the legal restrictions apply.
 
4.8  
Timing of Royalty Accrual . Royalties accruing to UNIVERSITY shall be owed by LICENSEE to UNIVERSITY when Licensed Product or Licensed Method are invoiced, or if not invoiced, when delivered, provided or performed to or for a third party.
 
4.9  
Interest on Late Payments. In the event that any payments are not received when due, LICENSEE shall pay additional interest charges on overdue balances in a period at a daily compounded annual rate of the prime rate quoted in the Wall Street Journal on the last business day of the reporting period plus 10%.  Interest shall be calculated from the date payment was due and until actually received by UNIVERSITY.
 
4.10  
Record Keeping, Inspection and Audit. LICENSEE shall maintain accurate books and records concerning this Agreement , and, upon reasonable advance notice by UNIVERSITY, LICENSEE’s records, inventory, and Licensed Product production or Licensed Method practice facilities shall be open for inspection by UNIVERSITY or University’s duly authorized agents for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of reports, including but not limited to calculations, deductions and payments due.  LICENSEE shall keep, and cause any sublicensee(s) to keep, accurate records and books showing the maintenance, production, inventory, sale, distribution or sublicensing of Licensed Product and the performance of Licensed Method.  LICENSEE shall permit UNIVERSITY or duly authorized agents of UNIVERSITY, during regular business hours, to inspect LICENSEE facilities and records for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of reports, quality control and auditing royalty payments due UNIVERSITY.  In the event payment is in error by Ten Thousand U.S. Dollars ($10,000.00) or more, LICENSEE shall pay all reasonable documented audit expenses.
 
4.11  
Invalidity. If any patent or patent claim within Patent Rights is held invalid in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction and last resort from which no appeal has or can be taken, all obligation to pay royalties based on that patent or claim or any claim patentably indistinct therefrom will cease as of the date of final decision.  LICENSEE shall not, however, be relieved from paying any royalties that accrued before the final decision, that are based on another patent or claim not involved in the final decision, or that are based on UNIVERSITY’s property rights.
 
5.  PATENT PROSECUTION AND ENFORCEMENT
 
5.1  
Patent Prosecution. UNIVERSITY maintain the Patent Rights at LICENSEE’s expense.  UNIVERSITY shall provide all patent correspondence to LICENSEE and LICENSEE shall have opportunity to review and make timely comment.

5.2  
Patent Marking. LICENSEE and sublicensee(s) shall mark Licensed Product with the patent numbers of the patents within Patent Rights in accordance to 35 U.S.C. Section 287 (or its foreign equivalents) to reflect that unauthorized production, use, sale, and distribution are prohibited.
 
5.3  
Infringement Notification. LICENSEE shall notify UNIVERSITY promptly of any known production, sale, marketing, distribution, or use of Licensed Product or the performance of Licensed Method by persons that are not authorized to produce, use, market, distribute, or sell Licensed Product or Licensed Method.  Notification of such infringement shall include reasonable details that would enable UNIVERSITY to investigate and terminate such infringement, and UNIVERSITY retains the right to terminate such infringement subject to this Article 5.
 
5.4  
Empowerment of LICENSEE Concerning Infringements. Pursuant to this Agreement and to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. Chapter 29 or other statutes, LICENSEE is empowered:
 
5.4.a  
to bring suit in its own name, at its own expense, and on its own behalf for infringement of presumably valid claims in Patent Rights, and
 
5.4.b  
in any such suit, to enjoin infringement and to collect for its use, damages, profits, and awards of whatever nature recoverable for such infringement, and
 
5.4.c  
in any such suit, to settle any claim or suit for infringement of Patent Rights with the prior written permission of UNIVERSITY, such permission not to be unreasonably withheld,
 
for which LICENSEE has exclusive rights under this Agreement, provided that LICENSEE shall notify UNIVERSITY of LICENSEE’s intention to file suit at least fourteen (14) days prior to filing thereof.  In the event that LICENSEE exercises its rights under this Paragraph, unless UNIVERSITY then notifies LICENSEE in writing, within seven (7) days after UNIVERSITY’s receipt of LICENSEE’s notice, that UNIVERSITY agrees to bear one-half of the expense of prosecuting such suit, all recoveries had or obtained in such suit shall belong solely to LICENSEE, with the exception of any royalties or their equivalent payable to UNIVERSITY as set forth in this Agreement.  In any suit brought by LICENSEE under this Paragraph in which UNIVERSITY has not agreed to bear one-half of the expenses of such suit, UNIVERSITY shall have the right to be represented by counsel of UNIVERSITY’s choice at UNIVERSITY’s expense if such suit involves, or causes to become involved, actual or potential rights, obligations, and/or properties of UNIVERSITY.  LICENSEE agrees to keep UNIVERSITY reasonably apprised of the status and progress of any litigation.
 
7 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
5.5  
Recoveries when University Shares Costs. If UNIVERSITY notifies LICENSEE that UNIVERSITY agrees to bear one-half of expenses as specified in Paragraph 5.4, and if UNIVERSITY pays LICENSEE from time to time as expenses are incurred, then all recoveries obtained in such suit shall be divided equally between LICENSEE and UNIVERSITY.
 
5.6  
Suits Brought By University. In the event that suit is brought by UNIVERSITY under this Article, UNIVERSITY agrees that LICENSEE may join UNIVERSITY as a party plaintiff in any such suit.
 
5.7  
Bearing of Expenses. In any infringement action commenced under this Article, provided that UNIVERSITY fails to notify LICENSEE, as provided in Paragraph 5.4, that UNIVERSITY agrees to bear one-half of the expense of prosecuting such suit, the expenses in such action, including, but not limited to, costs, fees, attorney fees, and disbursements, shall be paid solely by LICENSEE.
 
5.8  
UNIVERSITY Cooperation. UNIVERSITY shall cooperate fully with LICENSEE in connection with any infringement action initiated by LICENSEE under this Article, and UNIVERSITY agrees promptly to provide reasonable access to all necessary documents and to render reasonable assistance in response to a written request by LICENSEE.
 
5.9  
In The Event Of A Declaratory Judgment. In the event that a declaratory judgment action alleging invalidity or non-infringement of any of the patents included in Patent Rights shall be brought against LICENSEE or raised by way of counterclaim or affirmative defense in an infringement suit brought by LICENSEE under this Article, LICENSEE, pursuant to this Agreement and to 35 U.S.C. Chapter 29 or other statutes, is empowered:
 
5.9.a  
to defend the suit in its own name, at its own expense, and on its own behalf, for presumably valid claims in such patents; and
 
5.9.b  
in any such suit to enjoin infringement and to collect for its use, damages, profits, and awards of whatever nature recoverable for such infringement; and
 
5.9.c  
in any such suit to settle any claim or suit for declaratory judgment involving Patent Rights with the prior written permission of UNIVERSITY, such permission not to be unreasonably withheld.
 
Nothing in this Paragraph shall be construed as limiting any rights granted to or retained by either UNIVERSITY or LICENSEE under this Article.
 
8 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
5.10  
Damage Recovery. In the event that UNIVERSITY does not participate according to Paragraph 5.4 in any action brought under this Article and LICENSEE recovers damages, LICENSEE shall pay to UNIVERSITY an earned royalty on such recovery, the amount of such royalty to be equal to that specified in Article 3 and to be payable as specified under Article 4.
 
5.11  
No Obligation to Bring Suit. Nothing contained within this Article or this Agreement shall be construed to obligate UNIVERSITY to bring any suit or to enforce any rights under this Agreement.  Additionally, nothing contained within this Article or this Agreement shall be construed to limit the ability of UNIVERSITY to bring any suit or to enforce any rights under this Agreement.
 
 
6.  DILIGENCE
 
6.1  
Obligation to Commercialize. LICENSEE shall, using best business practice, diligently fill the market demands for Licensed Products and Licensed Method within the Field of Use and in the Territory.
 
6.2  
Approvals or Certifications. LICENSEE shall diligently endeavor to obtain all necessary governmental approvals for the manufacture, use, marketing, sale, and distribution of Licensed Products and/or performance of Licensed Method.
 
6.3  
Diligence Timelines. LICENSEE shall:
6.3.a  
market Licensed Products for sale, or Licensed Method for performance, in the Territory and the within the Field of Use by December 31, 2010; and
 
6.3.b  
market Licensed Products for sale and Licensed Method for performance within the Field of Use within sixty (60) days of regulatory approval by the appropriate governmental agency in each country in the Territory.
 
 
7.  TERM AND TERMINATION
 
7.1  
Term. This Agreement shall be in effect as of the Effective Date, and shall continue until the last-to-expire Patent Rights.
 
7.2  
Termination by LICENSEE. LICENSEE may terminate this Agreement, at any time, upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to UNIVERSITY and including in the notice a declaration that LICENSEE is no longer, and henceforth will not be, making commercial gain from the Patent Rights or Technical Information for Licensed Product.
 
7.3  
Termination by UNIVERSITY. If LICENSEE breaches any term of this Agreement, then UNIVERSITY may give written notice of the breach; and, if LICENSEE fails to correct the breach within sixty (60) days, then UNIVERSITY shall have the right to cancel or terminate this Agreement.  This right, if exercised by UNIVERSITY, supersedes the rights granted in Article 2.
 
9 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
7.4  
Automatic Termination. This Agreement will terminate automatically if, during the term of this Agreement, LICENSEE:
 
7.4.a  
commits any act of bankruptcy; or
 
7.4.b  
becomes insolvent; or
 
7.4.c  
is unable to pay its debts as they become due; or
 
7.4.d  
files a petition under any bankruptcy or insolvency act; or
 
7.4.e  
has a petition under any bankruptcy or insolvency act filed against it which is not dismissed within sixty (60) days; or
 
7.4.f  
offers any component of  Patent Rights for the benefit of its creditors; or
 
7.4.g  
terminates its incorporation.
 
7.5  
Termination by UNIVERSITY. UNIVERSITY shall have the right, at its sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement if, during the term of this Agreement, LICENSEE:
 
7.5.a  
ceases the commercial sale of Licensed Product or performance of Licensed Method; or
 
7.5.b  
liquidates or takes steps to liquidate its assets reasonably required for the sale of Licensed Product or the performance of Licensed Method.
 
7.6  
Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, LICENSEE shall immediately cease use of the rights granted herein, including but not limited to ceasing to transfer Licensed Products and practice Licensed Method; all Licensed Product under the control of LICENSEE and/or sublicensee(s) shall be fully and completely destroyed by LICENSEE using appropriate chemical and/or mechanical methods, excepting Licensed Product stock held by sublicensee(s) that remains in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
 
7.7  
Effect of Termination Upon Sublicenses. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, UNIVERSITY, at its sole discretion, shall determine whether sublicenses shall be canceled or assigned to UNIVERSITY.  LICENSEE agrees to assign to UNIVERSITY if requested by UNIVERSITY.
 
7.8  
No Relief of Obligations Incurred Prior to Termination. Termination of the Agreement granted hereunder for any reason by either party shall not relieve the parties of any obligation accruing prior to such termination.
 
7.9  
Surviving Terms.   Notwithstanding any termination or expiration of this Agreement, the provisions of Articles 9, 10 and 11 shall survive and shall be enforceable according to the terms thereof.
 
10 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
8.  ASSIGNMENT
 
8.1  
UNIVERSITY Assignments. UNIVERSITY may assign this Agreement.
 
8.2  
Other Assignments. This Agreement shall not be assigned by LICENSEE except:
 
8.2.a  
With the prior written consent of UNIVERSITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; or as part of a sale or transfer of substantially the entire business of LICENSEE relating to operations which concern this Agreement, and that a condition of such sale is purchaser’s agreement to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
 
8.2.b  
Assignment of this Agreement under this Article shall only become effective after UNIVERSITY receives written notice by the Party making the assignment to the other Party that:
 
8.2.b.i  
The assignment has been made;
 
8.2.b.ii  
The name of the new assignee;
 
8.2.b.iii  
Any breaches have been cured and payments due paid; and
 
8.2.b.iv  
The new recipient of notices and other necessary information required under Article 12.
 
9.  CONFIDENTIALITY
 
9.1  
Information Handling . LICENSEE shall safeguard confidential Technical Information (“Confidential Information”) supplied by UNIVERSITY against disclosure to others with the same degree of care as it exercises with its own data or information of a similar nature.  LICENSEE shall not use such Confidential Information except to perform its obligations under this Agreement, and shall not disclose such Confidential Information to others (except to its employees, agents, or consultants who are bound to LICENSEE by a like obligation of confidentiality) without the express written permission of UNIVERSITY, except that LICENSEE is not prevented from using or disclosing any of the Confidential Information that:
 
9.1.a  
LICENSEE can demonstrate by written records was previously known to it; or
 
9.1.b  
is now or becomes in the future public knowledge other than through acts or omissions of LICENSEE; or
 
9.1.c  
is lawfully obtained by LICENSEE from sources independent of UNIVERSITY without obligation of confidentiality; or
 
9.1.d  
is required to be disclosed to a third party by applicable laws or out of court proceedings.
 
9.2  
Term of secrecy. The secrecy obligations of LICENSEE under these terms shall remain in effect for five (5) years from the termination date of this Agreement.
 
9.3  
No Reduction of Obligations Due to Timing of Receipt of Technical Information. The obligations of confidentiality and limited use hereunder apply to any Confidential Information of UNIVERSITY provided to LICENSEE relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, whether supplied under this Agreement or prior to the Effective Date.
 
11 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
9.4  
Arizona Public Records Law. This Agreement itself cannot be Proprietary Information per the Arizona Public Records Law A.R.S. 39-121 and A.R.S. 41-1350.
 
10.     NO WARRANTIES
 
10.1  
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, UNIVERSITY MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS AND EXTENDS NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND VALIDITY OF PATENTED RIGHTS CLAIMS, ISSUED OR PENDING.  IT IS AGREED THAT LICENSEE ACCEPTS LICENSED PRODUCTS AND LICENSED METHODS ON AN “AS IS” BASIS .
 
10.2  
NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, OBLIGATES UNIVERSITY EITHER TO BRING OR TO PROSECUTE ACTIONS OR SUITS AGAINST THIRD PARTIES FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT OR TO FURNISH ANY KNOW-HOW OR TRADE SECRETS NOT PROVIDED IN UNIVERSITY’S PATENT RIGHTS.
 
10.3  
IN NO EVENT SHALL UNIVERSITY BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND INCLUDING INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE EXERCISE OF THIS LICENSE OR THE USE OF THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION OR LICENSED PRODUCTS.
 
10.4  
NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ANYTHING MADE, USED, OR SOLD UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE FREE FROM INFRINGEMENT OF ANY THIRD PARTY PATENTS.
 
10.5  
THIS AGREEMENT DOES NOT CONFER BY IMPLICATION, ESTOPPEL, OR OTHERWISE ANY LICENSE OR RIGHTS TO ANY OTHER PATENT OF UNIVERSITY OTHER THAN PATENT RIGHTS AS EXPRESSLY STATED HEREIN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH PATENTS ARE DOMINANT OR SUBORDINATE TO PATENT RIGHTS.
 
 
11.  LICENSEE REPRESENTATIONS, INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
 
11.1  
LICENSEE Warranties and Representations. LICENSEE warrants and represents that:
 
11.1.a  
The production, use, marketing, sale, and distribution of Licensed Products and the practice of Licensed Method shall be in conformance to applicable county, state, federal or foreign laws, rules, and regulations governing the production, use, marketing, sale, and distribution of Licensed Products or the practice of Licensed Method in or between any county, state, federal, or foreign jurisdiction; and
 
11.1.b  
Licensed Products will not be produced, used, marketed, sold, distributed, and/or sublicensed outside the Field of Use or Territory and that Licensed Method will not be practiced outside the Field of Use or Territory.
 
12 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
11.2  
LICENSEE Representations, Warranties and Indemnification. LICENSEE shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend UNIVERSITY, its officers, employees, agents, and the inventors of the Technical Information leading to patents and patent applications in Patent Rights and their employers, against any and all claims, suits, losses, damage, costs, fees, and expenses resulting from or arising out of the exercise of this Agreement or any sublicense, and those arising from the breach or non-performance by LICENSEE, of the foregoing obligations, representations and warranties.  This indemnification includes, but is not limited to, any product liability.
 
11.3  
Insurance Requirements. LICENSEE, at its sole cost and expense, shall insure its activities in connection with the work under this Agreement and obtain, keep in force, and maintain insurance as follows, or an equivalent program of self insurance:
 
11.3.a  
Comprehensive or commercial general liability insurance (contractual liability included) with its minimum limits as follows:
 
11.3.a.i  
Each Occurrence One Million U.S. Dollars ($1,000,000)
 
11.3.a.ii  
Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Two Million U.S. Dollars ($2,000,000)
 
11.3.a.iii  
Personal and Advertising Injury One Million U.S. Dollars ($1,000,000)
 
11.3.a.iv  
General Aggregate (commercial form only) Two Million U.S. Dollars ($2,000,000)
 
11.3.b  
The coverage and limits specified above do not in any way limit the liability of LICENSEE under this Agreement.  Such insurance coverage is required prior to the first sale of Licensed Products or performance of Licensed Method.  LICENSEE shall furnish UNIVERSITY with certificates of insurance showing compliance with all requirements.  Such certificates must:
 
11.3.b.i  
Provide for thirty (30) day advance written notice to UNIVERSITY of any modification.
 
11.3.b.ii  
Indicate that UNIVERSITY has been endorsed as an additional Insured under the coverage specified above.
 
11.3.b.iii  
Include a provision that the coverage will be primary and will not relate to nor will be excess over any valid and collectable insurance or program of self-insurance carried or maintained by UNIVERSITY.
 
11.4  
Notification Concerning Suits Under This Article. UNIVERSITY shall notify LICENSEE in writing of any claim or suit brought against UNIVERSITY in respect of which UNIVERSITY intends to invoke the provisions of this Article.  LICENSEE shall promptly keep UNIVERSITY informed on a current basis of its defense of any claims under this Article.
 
13 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
12.
NOTICES
 
12.1  
Delivery. Any royalty or fee payment, notice, or other communication required or permitted to be made or to be given to either party under this Agreement shall be sufficiently made or given on the date of mailing if sent to such party by either certified first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, or by traceable delivery services such as Federal Express, United Postal Service or DHL, addressed to that party at its address set forth below:
 
If to UNIVERSITY:
Attention OTT Reference: UA00-032
Office of Technology Transfer
The University of Arizona
University Services Building, Room 204
888 North Euclid Avenue
Tucson, AZ 85721
 
Phone: 520-621-5000             Facsimile: 520-626-4600
 
If to LICENSEE:
Mr. Steven Squires
Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc.
7700 South River Parkway
Tempe, AZ   85284

Phone: 623-792-8946             Facsimile:   623-792-8947

13.
MISCELLANEOUS

13.1  
Use of Names and Trademarks. Nothing contained in this Agreement confers any right to use in advertising, publicity, or other promotional activities any name, trade name, trademark, or other designation of any party hereto (including contraction, abbreviation, or simulation of any of the foregoing).  Unless required by law, the use by LICENSEE of the name “Arizona Board of Regents”, “The University of Arizona”, or the name of any campus associated with UNIVERSITY in advertising, publicity, or other promotional activities is prohibited.
 
13.2  
Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement is subject to and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona, but the scope and validity of any patent or patent application shall be governed by the applicable laws of the country where the patent or patent application is filed.
 
13.3  
Entire Understanding. This Agreement embodies the entire understanding of the parties, and there are no other agreements or understandings, either express or implied, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.  No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the parties unless made in writing and signed on behalf of each of the parties by their respective duly authorized officers or agents.
 
13.4  
Headings Provided For Convenience. The headings of the Articles and certain paragraphs are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part of or affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
 
13.5  
U.S. Manufacture. LICENSEE shall ensure compliance with Title 35 U.S.C. §204.
 
14 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona
 
13.6  
Government Reporting Requirements or Approvals. LICENSEE shall notify UNIVERSITY if LICENSEE becomes aware that this Agreement is subject to any U.S. or foreign government reporting or approval requirement.  LICENSEE shall make all necessary filings and pay all costs including, but not limited to, fees, penalties, and all other out-of-pocket costs associated with such reporting or approval process.
 
13.7  
Export Control. LICENSEE shall observe all applicable United States and foreign laws with respect to the transfer of Licensed Products or Licensed Method and related technical data to foreign countries, including, without limitation, the Export Administration Regulations.
 
13.8  
Enforceability of Terms. In case any of the provisions contained in this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, that invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provisions of this Agreement, and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained in it.
 
13.9  
State of Arizona Required Clauses.
 
13.9.a  
The parties agree to be bound by applicable state and federal rules governing equal employment opportunity, immigration and nondiscrimination.
 
13.9.b  
The parties agree that should a dispute arise between them, in any manner, concerning this Agreement, and said dispute involves the sum of Fifty Thousand U.S. Dollars ($50,000) or less in money damages only, exclusive of interest or cost of attorney’s fees, the parties will submit the matter to binding arbitration pursuant to the Arizona Supreme Court Rules for Compulsory Arbitration and the decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the parties.
 
13.9.c  
The parties recognize that the performance by the UNIVERSITY may be dependent upon the appropriation of funds by the State Legislature of Arizona.  Should the State Legislature of Arizona fail to appropriate the necessary funds, the UNIVERSITY may cancel this Agreement without further duty or obligation.
 
13.9.d  
This Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511.  The UNIVERSITY may cancel this Agreement by written notice to the parties if any person substantially involved in obtaining, drafting, or procuring this Agreement for or on behalf of the UNIVERSITY becomes an employee or consultant in any capacity of LICENSEE.
 
13.10  
Performance. The failure of any party hereto at any time or times to require performance of any provisions of this Agreement shall in no manner affect its right to enforce such provision at a later time.
 
13.11  
No Waiver.   No waiver by any party of this Agreement of any breach or default of any of the covenants or agreements herein set forth may be deemed a waiver as to any subsequent and/or similar breach or default.
 
13.12  
Parties.   The parties are not partners or joint venturers, and nothing herein shall be construed as causing them to be.  Neither of the parties has the authority to act in the other’s name, nor act for the other’s benefit, except as is expressly provided in this Agreement.
 
13.13  
Complete Agreement.   This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement, both written and oral, between the parties.  All prior agreements relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, whether written or oral, express or implied, are cancelled.
 
15 of 17

Patent Rights and Technical Information License
Solterra Renewable Technologies /The University of Arizona

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has executed this Agreement in duplicate originals by their respective and duly authorized officers on the day and year below written.

ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS                                                                         SOLTERRA RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES
        on behalf of
THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA


By:____________________________                                                                By:____________________________
(Signature)                                                                                                                    (Signature)
 
Name:  Patrick L. Jones                                                                                               Name: Steven Squires
 
Title:    Director                                                                                                            Title:  President and CEO
            Office of Technology Transfer

Date:___________________________                                                                Date:____________________________
 
 
16 of 17

 
Exhibit A
Technical Information Transferred as of the Effective Date


A.1.  
U.S. Patent No. 7,015,052, issued on March 21, 2006, entitled "Screen-Printing Techniques for the Fabrication of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes" and any and all U.S. issued patents or patent applications that may be derived therefrom "



17 of 17

EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
I, Stephen Squires, certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hague Corp.;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
                b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,  to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance  with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
November 23, 2009 
 
/s/ STEPHEN SQUIRES                           
 
    Stephen Squires, Chief Executive Officer  
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Brian Lukian, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hague Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
 and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance  with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 
       
November 23, 2009 
 
/s/ BRIAN LUKIAN                                
 
    Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer  

 
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hague Corp.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Squires, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
       
 
By:
/s/  STEPHEN SQUIRES
 
   
Stephen Squires
 
   
Chief Executive Officer
 
   
November 23, 2009
 




 
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hague Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
       
 
By:
/s/  BRIAN LUKIAN
 
   
Brian Lukian,
 
   
Chief Financial Officer
 
   
November 23, 2009