UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 10, 2016
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 000-22182 | 84-1070278 | ||
(State of other jurisdiction
of incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
||
2038 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 141, Carlsbad, CA 92011-1478 | ||||
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | ||||
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (760) 795-8517 | ||||
Not Applicable | ||||
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report) |
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425).
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14A-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 1.01 Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On August 10, 2016, the joint venture of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the “Company”) and Technology Properties Limited LLC (“TPL”), known as Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“PDS”), entered into an Agreement (the “Agreement”) with MMP Licensing LLC, a California limited liability company (“MMP Licensing LLC”), and Alliacense Limited LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Alliacense”).
Pursuant to the Agreement, MMP Licensing LLC will provide commercialization services to PDS for commercialization of the Moore Microprocessor Patent portfolio (the “MMP Portfolio”) with respect to certain companies (the “Project”). PDS also granted a license to MMP Licensing LLC for the commercialization of the MMP Portfolio.
Alliacense agreed to cooperate with reasonable discovery requests and provide support to litigation counsel through the provision of properly produced and protected materials in connection with patent infringement litigation currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Additionally, PDS agreed to pay Alliacense $84,000 within 24 hours after Alliacense delivers certain materials to Dominion Harbor Group, LLC, another company providing commercialization services to PDS, and an additional $84,000 out of subsequent recoveries under the Project. PDS and Alliacense have agreed to cause the arbitration between such parties to be dismissed with prejudice and provide mutual releases within 48 hours after PDS’s first payment of $84,000 to Alliacense.
The Agreement will terminate six years after the last-to-expire patent in the MMP Portfolio; provided that either party may terminate the agreement in the event of a material breach by the other party that is not cured, if capable of being cured, within 60 days after written notice of the breach.
The foregoing description of the Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits. The following materials are filed as exhibits to this current report on Form 8-K:
Exhibit Number | ||
10.1 | Agreement effective August 10, 2016 between Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, MMP Licensing LLC, and Alliacense Limited LLC.* |
*The Company has requested confidential treatment of portions of the exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted and are marked accordingly. The confidential portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2 |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION | |
Date: August 16, 2016 | By: /s/ CLIFFORD L. FLOWERS |
Clifford L. Flowers | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
3 |
Exhibit 10.1
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
AGREEMENT
This agreement ("Agreement " ) is entered into by and between:
Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC , a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 701 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 170, Carlsbad , CA 92011-1045 ("PDS") and Map Licensing LLC , a California limited liability company with its principal place of business at 2310 Homestead Road, Suite C1-505, Los Altos, CA 94024, and Alliacense Limited LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 4880 Stevens Creek Boulevard, #103 , San Jose, CA 95129 ("Alliacense ").
1. Project
1.1. MMP Licensing shall provide IP commercialization services to PDS for the commercialization of the MMP patent portfolio scheduled at Exhibit 1 t o Addendum B (the "Patents"), to the Project Group (the Licensing Group plus the Litigation Group) of companies (scheduled at Addendum A) (the " Services") .
1.1.1. MMP Licensing shall conduct a Patent infringement litigation campaign against a group of companies chosen by MMP Licensing from the Project Group. Accordingly, PDS shall grant to MMP Licensing the license attached hereto at Addendum B .
1.1.1.1. Once such a campaign is initiated , MMP Licensing shall have the option, upon consultation with PDS , to pursue further such campaigns (and thus expand the Litigation Group of companies) provided PDS is not responsible for such litigation attorney's fees or such litigation expenses; and accordingly , PDS shall grant to MMP Licensing the license attached hereto at Addendum B to enable such expansion .
1.1.2. MMP Licensing shall operate a Patent licensing program for those Project Group Companies that are not in the Litigation Group (the " Licensing Group " ).
1.1.3. MMP Licensing will provide updates every thirty days on its Services efforts (or sixty days with respect to Litigation) to PDS, and respond in a timely manner to all reasonable requests by PDS for information regarding the status and activi tie s of licensing and litigation efforts.
1.1.4. MMP Licensing shall conduct the Services such that Recovery is not comingled with recoveries from other IP commercialization services.
1 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
1.2. With respect the Patent infringement litigation currently pending in NDCA (the " NDCA Cases "):
1.2.1. In the event such cases continue {as a result of a successful appeal for example), Alliacense shall cooperate with all reasonable discovery requests {in the context), and shall provide support to litigation counsel through the provision of properly produced and protected materials.
1.3. Prior to Project travel, MMP Licensing shall estimate in detail, and PDS shall pay to MMP Licensing, all reasonable travel expenses that have been estimated by MMP Licensing and approved in writing by PDS in advance. MMP Licensing shall have no obligation to incur expenses on behalf of PDS. Any expenses benefiting other MMP Licensing clients shall be equitably allocated.
2. Distribution of Recovery
2.1. MMP Licensing shall be entitled to:
2.1.1. [*]% of each Litigation Group Recovery and NDCA Case Recovery; and
2.1.2. [*]% of each Licensing Group Recovery; and
2.1.3. [*]% of each Recovery from any entity not part of the Project Group.
2.2. With respect to Licensing Group Recovery, MMP Licensing shall arrange the [*]% distribution to MMP Licensing, and the [*]% distribution to PDS, to be paid as direct payments from each such Licensing Group company.
2.3. With respect Litigation Group Recovery, MMP Licensing shall arrange the [*]% distribution to MMP Licensing to be paid as a direct payment from each such Litigation Group company, and shall arrange the [*]% remainder to be paid as a direct payment from each such Litigation Group company to contingency litigation counsel ("CLC"), whom MMP Licensing shall instruct to deduct its fees and expenses, and to remit the remaining balance to PDS.
2.3.1. MMP Licensing shall endeavor to arrange for CLC and the funding of litigation expenses on the most favorable terms available (in its reasonable business judgment), such that the combined total should not exceed [*]% of Recovery. The parties acknowledge that such combined total may be significantly less than [*]%, by virtue of, for example, a stair-stepped milestone plan.
2.3.2. Prior to execution by MMP Licensing, MMP Licensing shall submit its proposed engagement agreement with the CLC (the "CLCA") to PDS Counsel.
2.3.2.1. The submitted CLCA shall be redacted so as to not reveal the identity of the CLC.
2.3.2.2. Within 3 business days, PDS counsel may object to the proposed CLCA by submitting a Proper Objection. A Proper Objection is an objection by PDS counsel that is accompanied by a writing detailing (1) the objection, (2) evidence substantiating its belief that the proposed CLCA is objectively commercially unreasonable, and (3) a cure for its objection that, if implemented, would not degrade MMP Licensing's rights or entitlements hereunder.
2.3.2.3. In the event of a Proper Objection, MMP Licensing shall not execute the proposed CLCA until it resolves the objection.
2 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
2.4. With respect to non Project Group Recovery, PDS shall arrange the [*]% distribution to Alliacense to be paid as direct payments from each such non Project Group company.
2.5. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by PDS and MMP Licensing, no other fees, costs or expenses shall be due to MMP Licensing for the Services provided.
2.6. "Recovery" means the gross amount of all cash received from the Licensing Companies and the Litigation Companies (including its members, affiliates, successors and assigns) related to the Patents, whether for the performance of a service, the satisfaction or release of any claim or transfer of any rights or benefits relating to the Patents. Recovery shall not include consideration not actually received, such as tax withholdings or credits unless and until such withholdings or credits are refunded to or used by a party.
3. Settlement
3.1. Within 24 hours of the execution of this agreement, Alliacense shall provide the MMP Materials for the Group 1 companies (as already produced in the Arbitration) (the "Materials") to DHG under the terms of the NOA already executed by DHG on 31 JAN 2015.
3.2. As payment in full for fees overdue to Alliacense on the Novatel, Garmin and Barnes & Nobel transactions, PDS shall pay to Alliacense (1) $84,000 within 24 hours of the delivery of the Materials by Alliacense to DHG ("Installment 1"), and (2) $84,000 as "first money out" of subsequent Recovery ("Installment 2") (in the form of direct payments).
3.3. Within 48 hours of the receipt by Alliacense of Installment 1, the parties hereto shall cause the arbitration pending between Alliacense and PDS (JAMS Ref. No.: 1110018059) (the "Arbitration") to be dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall also execute mutual releases.
4. Term and Termination
4.1. Other than any and all rights and obligations hereunder with respect to the Litigation Group:
4.1.1. This Agreement will terminate six (6) years after the last-to-expire Patent unless earlier terminated by mutual written consent of the parties or as set forth below. All payment obligations due prior to the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall survive such expiration or termination for any reason whatsoever; and
4.1.2. Either Party may terminate this Agreement in the event of a material breach by the other Party that is not cured, if capable of being cured, within sixty (60) days of written notice of the breach
3 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
4.2. In the event of termination:
4.2.1. By either party, PDS will remain responsible for and shall make all distributions of Recovery to MMP Licensing i n accordance with this Agreement for transactions concluded prior to such termination .
4.2.2. By PDS, MMP Licensing shall be entitled to identify up to three ( 3 ) entities from Exhibit A , for which PDS shall pay MMP Licensing the fee otherwise due under Section 2 of this Agreement for Recovery related to any of the up to three identified entities received by PDS within two (2) years following such terminat i on .
5. Confidentiality
5.1. The Parties shall maintain this Agreement and the terms of this Agreement as confidential , except that each Party may disclose the terms of this Agreement to its subsidiar i es and : (i) to any governmental authority having jurisdiction and requiring such disclosure ; (ii) in response to a valid subpoena or as otherwise may be required by law; (iii) as necessary in connection with any tax , securities or other fi l ings , reports o r disclosures that may be required under applicable l aws or regulat i ons ; ( iv ) in confidence , to a Party ' s accountants , legal counsel , tax advisors and other financial and legal advisors ; (v) as required during the course of litigation ; (vi) with obligations of confidentiality comparable to those contained herein , to another Party or its legal or financial advisors in connection with a proposed merger , acquisition , sp i n-off , financ i ng or similar transaction of such Party or its Subs i diaries ; ( v ii) as necessary to file this Agreement or portions the r eof with governmenta l author i ties ; and (ix) with the prior written consent of the other Party .
5.2. Neither this Agreement nor any performance in pursuit of the Project , shall create any rights or licenses to any intellectual property between or among the parties , nor shall it create any obligation to share work product , communications, technology , t r ade secrets , know-how , show how and other proprietary developments and d i scove ri es conceived or reduced to practice dur i ng the term of this agreemen t.
4 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
6. Dispute Resolution
6.1 All rights and obligations under this Agreement shall be resolved as if all persons and all transactions related to this Agreement had their legal residence , situs, and employment in Santa Clara County California . Within 15 days after written notice of the dispute , members of the most senior management of the parties shall meet and exercise their commercially reasonable efforts to resolve any dispute under this Agreement. The Agreement and all performances due hereunder shall continue unabated throughout the entire process and a final adjudication in accordance with the terms hereof has been made from which no appeal or review can be undertaken . In the event the parties fail to resolve their dispute after having undertaken the foregoing efforts , then they may pursue their claims in the appropriate Santa Clara County court .
7. Representations and Warranties
7.1. Each Party represents and warrants that it has the right to enter this Agreement, and to undertake the duties hereunder .
7.2. MMP Licensing will undertake commercially reasonable efforts to execute the Project, but provides no representation or warranty as to the outcome .
7.3. PDS each represents and warrants that it will:
7.3.1. Cooperate with and support MMP Licensing in its performance of the Project; and
7.3.2. Avoid and refrain from any and all activity of any kind or nature that may impede, impair, obstruct, frustrate or otherwise interfere with the activities of MMP Licensing in its performance of the Project.
8. Other
8.1. This Agreement together with its Exhibits contains the entire agreement between the Parties.
5 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of August 10, 2016 .
PDS
“LICENSOR” |
MMP LICENSING
“LICENSEE” |
By: /s/ Carl Johnson Carl Johnson Title: Manager Date: 10 August 2016
By: /s/ Swamy Venkidu Title: Manager Date: 10 August 2016 |
By: /s/ Mac Leckrone Mac Leckrone Title: Manager Date: 10 August 2016 |
Also Acknowledged and Agreed:
By: /s/ Mac Leckrone Mac Leckrone Title: President, Alliacnese Date: 10 August 2016 |
6 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT GROUP COMPANIES
[*]
7 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
[*]
8 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
[*]
9 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
ADDENDUM B
FORM OF LICENSE
This License ("License") is entered into by and between Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, a Delaware limited liability company , having its principal place of businessat 701 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 170, Carlsbad, CA 92011-1045 ("Licensor'') on the one hand, and MMP Licensing LLC, a California limited liability company with its principal place of business for these purposes at 2310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, CA, Suite C1-505, hereinafter "Licensee" on the other hand.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained as well as of other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and pursuant to that certain Agreement between Licensee and Licensor dated 10 August 2016 (the "Agreement"), it is covenanted and agreed by and between the parties hereto that:
1. Subject Matter.
"Project Patents" means the patents and applications scheduled at Exhibit A, entitled "Schedule of Project Patents."
"Commercialize" means to make and have made, use and have used, sell and have sold, import and have imported.
2. Conveyance.
2.1. Licensor hereby grants to Licensee:
2.1.1. A world-wide, irrevocable, non-exclusive license under the Project Patents to Commercialize Licensee products; and
2.1.2. With respect to the Litigation Companies, a world-wide, irrevocable, exclusive license under the Project Patents to:
2.1.2.1. Regulate and control by license, sublicense, affiliation, or other agreement the practice and/or use of any and all of the Project Patents; and
2.1.2.2. Otherwise pursue the commercialization and enforcement of any and all claims of the Project Patents, including the Commercialization of any and all products and/or services and the practice of any and all methods and processes covered by any and all claims of any or all of the Project Patents; and
2.1.2.3. Sue on and collect for its own use and benefit all claims and/or entitlements with respect to damages by reason of past, present and future infringement or use of any and all of the Project Patents; and,
2.1.2.4. Pursue in its own name and for its own use and benefit all remedies of whatsoever kind or nature (including inj unctive relief) relating to the past, present , or future infringement or use of any and all of the Project Patents .
10 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
3. Attachments.
• Exhibit A: Schedule of Project Patents
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of August 10, 2016 .
PDS
“LICENSOR” |
MMP LICENSING
“LICENSEE” |
By: /s/ Carl Johnson Carl Johnson Title: Manager Date: 10 August 2016
By: /s/ Swamy Venkidu Title: Manager Date: 10 August 2016 |
By: /s/ Mac Leckrone Mac Leckrone Title: Manager Date: 10 August 2016 |
11 |
Confidential information has been omitted from portions of this document, indicated by [*], and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.
EXHIBIT A
SCHEDULE OF PROJECT PATENTS
Country | Pate n t # | Filing | App # | Issue | Title | ||||||||||||
us | 5 , 440 ,749 | 03-Aug-89 | 07/389 , 334 | 08-Aug-95 | High Performa nce, Low Cost Microprocessor w it h Combination Stack and Reg i ster Architec t ure | ||||||||||||
us | 5 ,530 890 | 07-Jun-95 | 08/480 206 | 25-Jun-96 | High Performance , Low Cost Microprocessor | ||||||||||||
us | 5,530 890 C1 | 16-Jan-09 | 90/009 388 | 01-Mar - 11 | High Performance , Low Cost Micropro cesso r | ||||||||||||
us | 5,659,703 | 07-Jun-95 | 08/482,185 | 19-Aug-97 | Microprocessor System With Hierarchical Stack And Method Of Operation | ||||||||||||
us | 5,809 ,3 36 | 07-Jun-95 | 08/484,918 | 15-Sep-98 | H ig h Performance Microproc essor Having Va r i able Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
us | 6 , 598, 148 C1 | 21-Sep-06 | 90/008,227 | 06-Sep-11 | High Perfo rmance Microproce ssor Having V ariable Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
us | 6 , 598 ,148 C1 | 29-May-09 | 90 / 010 , 562 | 06-Sep-11 | H ig h Perf ormance Microprocessor Having Variable Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
us | 5,809,336 C1 | 19-Oct-06 | 90/008 ,3 06 | 15-Dec-09 | High Performance Microprocessor Hav i ng Var i able Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
us | 5 ,8 09 , 336 C1 | 17-Nov-06 | 90/008 , 237 | 15-Dec-09 | H i gh Perfo rmance Microprocessor Having Variable Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
us | 5 , 809 , 336 C1 | 30-Jan-07 | 90/008,474 | 15 - Dec - 09 | High Perf ormance Microprocessor Hav i ng Var i able Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
us | 5,809 , 336 C2 | 24-Aug-09 | 90/009 , 457 | 23-Nov - 10 | High Performance Microprocessor Hav in g Variable Speed System C l ock | ||||||||||||
us | 5 ,78 4 ,5 84 | 07-Jun-95 | 08/484,935 | 21-Jul-98 | High Performance Micro processor Us i ng Instru ctions That Operate Wit hin Instruction Groups | ||||||||||||
us | 5,784,584 C1 | 15-Nov-06 | 90/008,225 | 21-Jul-09 | High Performance Microprocessor Us i ng Instructions That Operate Within Instruction Groups | ||||||||||||
us | 19-Oct-06 | 90/008,299 | 21-Jul-09 | High Performance Microprocessor Using Instru ctio ns That Operate Within I n st ruction Groups | |||||||||||||
us | 5 , 604,915 | 07-Jun-95 | 08/485 , 031 | 18-Feb-97 | Data Processi ng System Having Load Dependent Bus Terminal | ||||||||||||
us | 5,440 ,7 49 C1 | 31-Mar-08 | 90/009,034 | 07-Jun-11 | High Performance , Low Cost Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||
us | 5,440,749 C1 | 16-Jan-09 | 90/009,389 | 07-Jun-11 | High Performance, Low Cost Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||
us | 5,440 ,7 49 C1 | 30-Apr-09 | 90/010 , 520 | 07-Jun-11 | High Performanc e, Low Cost Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||
IR | 0870226 | 04-Oct-96 | 96934069.4 | 21-Mav-03 | RISC Mi croprocessor Architec tur e | ||||||||||||
JP | JP 3739797 | 04-Oct-96 | 1996-515848 | 11-Nov - 05 | RISC Microprocessor Arch it ectu re | ||||||||||||
JP | 3955305 | 22-Aug-05 | 2005-240441 | 11-Mav-07 | RISC Microprocessor Arch i tecture | ||||||||||||
JP | 4859616 | 10-Oct-06 | 2006-276681 | 11-Nov-11 | RISC Microprocessor A rch it ecture | ||||||||||||
UK | 0870226 | 04-Oct-96 | 96934069.4 | 21-Mav-03 | RISC Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||
JP | 12-Nov-08 | 2008-290229 | RISC Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||||
JP | 15-Jun-09 | 2009-141967 | RISC Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||||
us | 31 -Oct -07 | 11 /9 81 , 278 | Using Breakpoints for Debugging in a R I SC Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||||
us | 6 , 598 , 148 | 29-Ju l-98 | 09/124 , 623 | 22-Jul - 03 | High Performance Microprocessor Having Variable Speed System Clock | ||||||||||||
DE | DE 69033568 . 7 | 02-Aug-90 | 97200767.8 | 14-Jun-00 | High Performan ce, Low Cost Microprocessor | ||||||||||||
EPO | EP 0786730 | 14-Mar-97 | 97200767 . 8 | 14-Jun-00 | High Performance, Low Cost Microprocessor | ||||||||||||
FR | 0786730 | 02-Aug-90 | 97200767 . 8 | 14-Jun-00 | High Performance, Low Cost Microprocessor | ||||||||||||
IT | 0786730 | 02-Aug-90 | 97200767.8 | 14-Jun-00 | High Perfo r mance Low Cost M i croprocessor | ||||||||||||
JP | JP 2966085 | 02-Aug-90 | 02-511130 | 25-Oct - 99 | High Performance , Low Cost Microprocessor | ||||||||||||
NL | 0786730 | 02-Aug -90 | 97200767 . 8 | 14-Jun-00 | High Performance Low Cost M i croprocessor | ||||||||||||
UK | 0786730 | 02-Aug-90 | 97200767 . 8 | 14-Jun - 00 | High Performance , Low Cost Microprocessor | ||||||||||||
us | 06-Oct-95 | 60/005 , 408 | RISC Microprocessor Architecture | ||||||||||||||
Any other U.S. or Non U.S. patent or application issued or pending which is a continuation, divisional, continuation in part, reissue, or reexamination of any of the scheduled patents or applications.
12 |