NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | | | | | | | |
Note Number | | Page Number |
| | |
| | |
| | |
2 | Revenue | |
| | |
3 | Earnings Per Share | |
| | |
4 | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | |
| | |
5 | | |
| | |
6 | Stock-Based Compensation Plans | |
| | |
7 | Taxes | |
| | |
8 | Leases | |
| | |
9 | Variable Interest Entities | |
| | |
10 | Fair Value Measurements | |
| | |
11 | Capitalization | |
| | |
12 | Short-Term Borrowings and Bank Lines of Credit | |
| | |
13 | Regulatory Matters | |
| | |
14 | Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
15 | Segment Information | |
| | |
16 | Discontinued Operations | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Unless otherwise indicated, defined terms and abbreviations used herein have the meanings set forth in the accompanying Glossary of Terms.
FE was incorporated under Ohio law in 1996. FE’s principal business is the holding, directly or indirectly, of all of the outstanding equity of its principal subsidiaries as of December 31, 2023: OE, CEI, TE, Penn (a wholly owned subsidiary of OE), JCP&L, ME, PN, FESC, MP, AGC (a wholly owned subsidiary of MP), PE, WP and KATCo. Additionally, FET is a majority-owned subsidiary of FE, and is the parent company of ATSI, MAIT, PATH and TrAIL. In addition, FE holds all of the outstanding equity of other direct subsidiaries including FEV, which currently holds a 33-1/3% equity ownership in Global Holding, the holding company for a joint venture in the Signal Peak mining and coal transportation operations.
On January 1, 2024, FirstEnergy consolidated the Pennsylvania Companies into FE PA, including OE subsidiary, Penn, making FE PA a new, single operating entity. In addition to merging each of the Pennsylvania Companies with and into FE PA, with FE PA surviving such mergers as the successor-in-interest to all assets and liabilities of the Pennsylvania Companies, (i) WP transferred certain of its Pennsylvania-based transmission assets to KATCo, and (ii) PN and ME contributed their respective Class B equity interests of MAIT to FE. FE PA, as of January 1, 2024, is FE’s only regulated distribution utility in Pennsylvania encompassing the operations previously conducted individually by the Pennsylvania Companies and serves an area with a population of approximately 4.5 million. FE PA operates under the rate districts of the former Pennsylvania Companies. FirstEnergy is also evaluating the legal, financial, operational and branding benefits of consolidating the Ohio Companies into a single Ohio utility company.
On May 31, 2022, Brookfield and the Brookfield Guarantors acquired 19.9% of the issued and outstanding membership interests of FET. FirstEnergy presents the third-party investors’ ownership portion of FirstEnergy's net income, net assets and comprehensive income as NCI. NCI is included as a component of equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
FESC provides legal, financial and other corporate support services at cost, in accordance with its cost allocation manual, to affiliated FirstEnergy companies. FE does not bill directly or allocate any of its costs to any subsidiary company. Costs are charged to FE's subsidiaries for services received from FESC either through direct billing or through an allocation process. Allocated costs are for services that are provided on behalf of more than one company, or costs that cannot be precisely identified and are allocated using formulas developed by FESC. Intercompany transactions are generally settled under commercial terms within thirty days.
FE and its subsidiaries are principally involved in the transmission, distribution, and generation of electricity. FirstEnergy’s utility operating companies comprise one of the nation’s largest investor-owned electric systems, serving over six million customers in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions. FirstEnergy’s transmission operations include more than 24,000 miles of transmission lines and two regional transmission operation centers. AGC and MP control 3,580 MWs of total capacity.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and the rules and regulations of the SEC. FE and its subsidiaries follow GAAP and comply with the related regulations, orders, policies and practices prescribed by the SEC, FERC, and, as applicable, the PUCO, the PPUC, the MDPSC, the NYPSC, the WVPSC, the VSCC and the NJBPU. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make periodic estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The reported results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for any future period. FE and its subsidiaries have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued.
FE and its subsidiaries consolidate all majority-owned subsidiaries over which they exercise control and, when applicable, entities for which they have a controlling financial interest. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation as appropriate and permitted pursuant to GAAP. As further discussed below, FE and its subsidiaries consolidate a VIE when it is determined that it is the primary beneficiary. Investments in affiliates over which FE and its subsidiaries have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not have a controlling financial interest, follow the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the interest in the entity is reported as an investment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the percentage of FE's ownership share of the entity’s earnings is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation, including presenting long-term debt and other long-term obligations within “Noncurrent Liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as compared to “Total Capitalization”.
Economic Conditions
Post-pandemic economic conditions have increased supply chain lead times across numerous material categories, with some as much as tripling from pre-pandemic lead times. Several key suppliers have struggled with labor shortages and raw material availability, which along with inflationary pressure that appears to be moderating, have increased costs and decreased the availability of certain materials, equipment and contractors. FirstEnergy has taken steps to mitigate these risks and does not currently expect service disruptions or any material impact on its capital spending plan. However, the situation remains fluid and a prolonged continuation or further increase in supply chain disruptions could have an adverse effect on FirstEnergy’s results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
Facility Optimization
FirstEnergy has begun implementing its facility optimization plans, which focus on both cost savings and alignment with our flexible working arrangements and EESG priorities, which will result in exiting the General Office in Akron, Ohio, and other corporate facilities in Brecksville, Ohio, Greensburg, Pennsylvania and Morristown, New Jersey beginning in 2024. In December 2023, FirstEnergy purchased the General Office building with the intention to sell in the future. It is currently expected that the exit of the General Office and sale will occur in 2025. The corporate headquarters will remain in Akron, Ohio, moving to the West Akron Campus, and FirstEnergy continues to explore real estate options and relocation opportunities for the other corporate facilities. As FirstEnergy continues to transform the business and implement initiatives to reduce costs, including the facility optimization plan, the impact of such actions may result in future impairments or other charges that may be significant. The result of these combined efforts will help build a stronger, more sustainable company for the near and long term.
Sale of Equity Interest in FirstEnergy Transmission, LLC
On February 2, 2023, FE, along with FET, entered into the FET P&SA II with Brookfield and the Brookfield Guarantors, pursuant to which FE agreed to sell to Brookfield at the closing, and Brookfield agreed to purchase from FE, an incremental 30% equity interest in FET for a purchase price of $3.5 billion. The majority of the purchase price is expected to be paid in cash upon closing, and the remainder will be payable by the issuance of a promissory note, which is expected to be repaid by the end of 2024. As a result of the consummation of the transaction, Brookfield’s interest in FET will increase from 19.9% to 49.9%, while FE will retain the remaining 50.1% ownership interests of FET. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval from the PPUC. In addition, pursuant to the FET P&SA II, FirstEnergy made the necessary filings with the applicable regulatory authorities for the PA Consolidation. The FET Minority Equity Interest Sale is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2024. Upon closing, FET will continue to be consolidated in FirstEnergy’s financial statements.
Pursuant to the terms of the FET P&SA II, in connection with the closing, Brookfield, FET and FE will enter into the A&R FET LLC Agreement, which will amend and restate in its entirety the current limited liability company agreement of FET. The A&R FET LLC Agreement, among other things, provides for the governance, exit, capital and distribution, and other arrangements for FET from and following the closing. Under the A&R FET LLC Agreement, at the closing, the FET Board will consist of five directors, two appointed by Brookfield and three appointed by FE.
Reference Rate Reform
In March of 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” (issued March 2020 and subsequently updated). This ASU, which introduces Topic ASC 848 to the FASB codification, provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions, that if elected, will ease the financial reporting burdens related to the market transition from London Inter-Bank Offered Rate and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates.
On April 27, 2023, FE, FET, the Utilities and the Transmission Companies entered into amendments to the 2021 Credit Facilities to, among other things: (i) permit the sale from FE to Brookfield of an incremental 30% equity interest in FET for a purchase price of $3.5 billion, (ii) permit the consolidation of the Pennsylvania Companies into a new, single operating entity, FE PA, which will be FE’s only regulated utility in Pennsylvania encompassing the operations previously conducted individually by the Pennsylvania Companies, and (iii) transition the benchmark interest rate for borrowings under the 2021 Credit Facilities from London Inter-Bank Offered Rate to SOFR. During the second quarter of 2023, FirstEnergy utilized the optional expedient within ASC 848 to account for the amendments to the credit facilities as a continuation of the existing contract without additional analysis.
ACCOUNTING FOR THE EFFECTS OF REGULATION
FirstEnergy’s Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission segments are subject to regulation that sets the prices (rates) the Utilities and the Transmission Companies are permitted to charge customers based on costs that the regulatory agencies determine are permitted to be recovered. At times, regulatory agencies permit the future recovery of costs that would be currently charged to expense by an unregulated company. The ratemaking process results in the recording of regulatory assets and liabilities based on anticipated future cash inflows and outflows.
FirstEnergy reviews the probability of recovery of regulatory assets, and settlement of regulatory liabilities, at each balance sheet date and whenever new events occur. Factors that may affect probability include changes in the regulatory environment, issuance of a regulatory commission order, or passage of new legislation. Upon material changes to these factors, where applicable, FirstEnergy will record new regulatory assets or liabilities and will assess whether it is probable that currently recorded regulatory assets and liabilities will be recovered or settled in future rates. If recovery of a regulatory asset is no longer probable, FirstEnergy will write off that regulatory asset as a charge against earnings. FirstEnergy considers the entire regulatory asset balance as the unit of account for the purposes of balance sheet classification rather than the next years recovery and as such net regulatory assets and liabilities are presented in the non-current section on the FirstEnergy Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 13, "Regulatory Matters," of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
The following table provides information about the composition of net regulatory assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the changes during the year 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | |
Net Regulatory Assets (Liabilities) by Source | | 2023 | | 2022 | | Change |
| | (In millions) |
| | | | | | |
Customer payables for future income taxes | | $ | (2,382) | | | $ | (2,463) | | | $ | 81 | |
Spent nuclear fuel disposal costs | | (83) | | | (83) | | | — | |
Asset removal costs | | (652) | | | (675) | | | 23 | |
Deferred transmission costs | | 286 | | | 50 | | | 236 | |
Deferred generation costs | | 572 | | | 235 | | | 337 | |
Deferred distribution costs | | 247 | | | 164 | | | 83 | |
| | | | | | |
Storm-related costs | | 799 | | | 683 | | | 116 | |
| | | | | | |
Energy efficiency program costs | | 198 | | | 94 | | | 104 | |
New Jersey societal benefit costs | | 79 | | | 94 | | | (15) | |
| | | | | | |
Vegetation management | | 102 | | | 63 | | | 39 | |
Other | | (11) | | | 24 | | | (35) | |
Net Regulatory Liabilities included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets | | $ | (845) | | | $ | (1,814) | | | $ | 969 | |
The following table provides information about the composition of net regulatory assets that do not earn a current return as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, of which approximately $371 million and $511 million, respectively, are currently being recovered through rates over varying periods, through 2068, depending on the nature of the deferral and the jurisdiction:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory Assets by Source Not Earning a | | As of December 31, | | |
Current Return | | 2023 | | 2022 | | Change |
| | | | (In millions) | | |
| | | | | | |
Deferred transmission costs | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | (2) | |
Deferred generation costs | | 432 | | | 262 | | | 170 | |
Deferred distribution costs | | 68 | | | 27 | | | 41 | |
Storm-related costs | | 602 | | | 568 | | | 34 | |
Pandemic-related costs | | 35 | | | 45 | | | (10) | |
| | | | | | |
Vegetation management | | 21 | | | 52 | | | (31) | |
Other | | 33 | | | 35 | | | (2) | |
Regulatory Assets Not Earning a Current Return | | $ | 1,197 | | | $ | 997 | | | $ | 200 | |
DERIVATIVES
FirstEnergy is exposed to limited financial risks resulting from fluctuating interest rates and commodity prices, including prices for electricity, coal and energy transmission. To manage the volatility related to these exposures, FirstEnergy’s Risk Policy Committee, comprised of senior management, provides general management oversight for risk management activities throughout FirstEnergy. The Risk Policy Committee is responsible for promoting the effective design and implementation of sound risk management programs and oversees compliance with corporate risk management policies and established risk management practice. FirstEnergy may use a variety of derivative instruments for risk management purposes including forward contracts, options, futures contracts and swaps.
FirstEnergy accounts for derivative instruments on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value unless they meet the normal purchases and normal sales criteria. Derivative instruments meeting the normal purchases and normal sales criteria are accounted for under the accrual method of accounting with their effects included in earnings at the time of contract performance.
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
Investments in affiliates over which FE and its subsidiaries have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not have a controlling financial interest, follow the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the interest in the entity is reported as an investment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reflected in "Investments". The percentage of FE's ownership share of the entity’s earnings is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income and reflected in “Other Income (Expense)”. Equity method investments are assessed for impairment annually or whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, the investment is written down to its estimated fair value, which establishes a new cost basis in the investment.
Equity method investments included within "Investments" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $104 million and $90 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Global Holdings - FEV currently holds a 33-1/3% equity ownership in Global Holding, the holding company for a joint venture in the Signal Peak mining and coal transportation operations with coal sales primarily focused on international markets. FEV is not the primary beneficiary of the joint venture, as it does not have control over the significant activities affecting the joint venture's economic performance. FEV's ownership interest is subject to the equity method of accounting. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, pre-tax income related to FEV’s ownership in Global Holding was $175 million, $168 million and $29 million, respectively. FEV’s pre-tax equity earnings and investment in Global Holding are included in Corporate/Other for segment reporting.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying value of the equity method investment was $66 million and $57 million, respectively. During 2023 and 2022, FEV received cash dividends from Global Holding totaling $165 million and $170 million, respectively, which were classified with “Cash from Operating Activities” on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
PATH WV - PATH, was a proposed transmission line from West Virginia through Virginia into Maryland which PJM cancelled in 2012, is a series limited liability company that is comprised of multiple series, each of which has separate rights, powers and duties regarding specified property and the series profits and losses associated with such property. A subsidiary of FE owns 100% of the Allegheny Series (PATH-Allegheny) and 50% of the West Virginia Series (PATH-WV), which is a joint venture with a subsidiary of AEP. FirstEnergy is not the primary beneficiary of PATH-WV, as it does not have control over the significant activities affecting the economics of PATH-WV. FirstEnergy's ownership interest in PATH-WV is subject to the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying value of the equity method investment was $17 million and $18 million, respectively. FirstEnergy's pre-tax equity earnings in PATH-WV were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
GOODWILL
In a business combination, the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. FirstEnergy evaluates goodwill for impairment annually on July 31 and more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. In evaluating goodwill for impairment, FirstEnergy assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value (including goodwill). If FirstEnergy concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then no further testing is required. However, if FirstEnergy concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value or bypasses the qualitative assessment, then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed to identify a potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of impairment to be recognized, if any.
As of July 31, 2023, FirstEnergy performed a qualitative assessment of the Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission reporting units' goodwill, assessing economic, industry and market considerations in addition to the reporting units' overall financial performance. Key factors used in the assessment included: growth rates, interest rates, expected investments, utility sector market performance, regulatory and legal developments, and other market considerations. It was determined that the fair values of these reporting units were, more likely than not, greater than their carrying values and a quantitative analysis was not necessary.
FirstEnergy's reporting units are consistent with its reportable segments and consist of Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission. The following table presents goodwill by reporting unit as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | Regulated Distribution | | Regulated Transmission | | Consolidated |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Goodwill | | $ | 5,004 | | | $ | 614 | | | $ | 5,618 | |
INVENTORY
Materials and supplies inventory primarily includes fuel inventory, emission allowances, and the distribution, transmission and generation plant materials, net of reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Materials charged to inventory are at weighted average cost when purchased and expensed or capitalized, as appropriate, when used or installed. Fuel inventory consists primarily of coal and reagents that are consumed at MP's generation plants, and is accounted for at weighted average cost when purchased and recorded to fuel expense when consumed.
Emission allowances are accounted for as inventory at cost when purchased. FirstEnergy’s emission allowance compliance obligation, principally associated with MP's generation plant operations, is accrued to fuel expense at a weighted average cost based on each month’s emissions. When emission allowances are submitted to the EPA, inventory and the compliance obligation are reduced. Due to the ENEC, fuel, emission allowances and other fuel-related expenses have no material impact on current period earnings.
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
FirstEnergy maintains a controlling financial interest in certain less than wholly owned subsidiaries. As a result, FirstEnergy presents the third-party investors’ ownership portion of FirstEnergy's net income, net assets and comprehensive income as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest is included as a component of equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On May 31, 2022, Brookfield and the Brookfield Guarantors acquired 19.9% of the issued and outstanding membership interests of FET. The difference between the cash consideration received, net of transaction costs of approximately $37 million, and the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest of $451 million was recorded as an increase to Other Paid-In Capital. KATCo, which was a subsidiary of FET, became a wholly owned subsidiary of FE prior to the closing of the transaction and remains in the Regulated Transmission segment.
Pursuant to the terms of the FET P&SA I, on May 31, 2022, Brookfield, FET and FE entered into the FET LLC Agreement. The FET LLC Agreement, among other things, provides for the governance, exit, capital and distribution, and other arrangements for FET from and following the closing. Under the FET LLC Agreement, Brookfield is entitled to appoint a number of directors to the FET Board, in approximate proportion to Brookfield’s ownership percentage in FET (rounded to the next whole number). The FET Board now consists of five directors, one appointed by Brookfield and four appointed by FE.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment reflects original cost (net of any impairments recognized), including payroll and related costs such as taxes, employee benefits, administrative and general costs, and financing costs incurred to place the assets in service. The costs of normal maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are expensed as incurred. FirstEnergy recognizes liabilities for planned major maintenance projects as they are incurred.
Property, plant and equipment balances by segment as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2023 |
Property, Plant and Equipment | | In Service(1) | | Accum. Depr.(2) | | Net Plant | | CWIP | | Total |
| | (In millions) |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 33,453 | | | $ | (10,039) | | | $ | 23,414 | | | $ | 860 | | | $ | 24,274 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 15,538 | | | (3,178) | | | 12,360 | | | 1,208 | | | 13,568 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate/Other | | 1,116 | | | (594) | | | 522 | | | 48 | | | 570 | |
Total | | $ | 50,107 | | | $ | (13,811) | | | $ | 36,296 | | | $ | 2,116 | | | $ | 38,412 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 |
Property, Plant and Equipment | | In Service(1) | | Accum. Depr.(2) | | Net Plant | | CWIP | | Total |
| | (In millions) |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 32,257 | | | $ | (9,636) | | | $ | 22,621 | | | $ | 828 | | | $ | 23,449 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 14,468 | | | (2,978) | | | 11,490 | | | 818 | | | 12,308 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate/Other | | 1,125 | | | (644) | | | 481 | | | 47 | | | 528 | |
Total | | $ | 47,850 | | | $ | (13,258) | | | $ | 34,592 | | | $ | 1,693 | | | $ | 36,285 | |
(1) Includes finance leases of $68 million and $105 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(2) Includes finance lease accumulated amortization of $33 million and $60 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Regulated Distribution has approximately $2.2 billion of total regulated generation property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2023.
FirstEnergy provides for depreciation on a straight-line basis at various rates over the estimated lives of property included in plant in service. The respective annual composite depreciation rates for FirstEnergy were approximately 2.8% in 2023 and 2.7% in each of 2022 and 2021.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, capitalized financing costs on FirstEnergy's Consolidated Statements of Income include $44 million, $56 million and $48 million, respectively, of allowance for equity funds used during construction and $53 million, $28 million and $27 million, respectively, of capitalized interest.
Asset Impairments
FirstEnergy evaluates long-lived assets classified as held and used for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the long-lived assets may not be recoverable. First, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets is compared with the carrying value of the assets. If the carrying value is greater than the undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the amount the carrying value of the assets exceeds its estimated fair value.
Asset Retirement Obligations
FirstEnergy recognizes an ARO for its legal obligation to perform asset retirement activities associated with its long-lived assets. The ARO liability represents an estimate of the fair value of FirstEnergy's current obligation such that the ARO is accreted monthly to reflect the time value of money.
A fair value measurement inherently involves uncertainty in the amount and timing of settlement of the liability. FirstEnergy uses an expected cash flow approach to measure the fair value of the remediation AROs, considering the expected timing of settlement of the ARO based on the expected economic useful life of associated asset and/or regulatory requirements. The fair value of an ARO is recognized in the period in which it is incurred. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying value of the long-lived asset and are depreciated over the life of the related asset. In certain circumstances, FirstEnergy has recovery of asset retirement costs and, as such, certain accretion and depreciation is offset against regulatory assets. Conditional retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets are recognized at fair value in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate can be made, even though there may be uncertainty about timing or method of settlement. When settlement is conditional on a future event occurring, it is reflected in the measurement of the liability, not the timing of the liability recognition.
FirstEnergy has recognized applicable legal obligations for AROs and their associated cost, including reclamation of sludge disposal ponds, closure of coal ash disposal sites, underground and above-ground storage tanks and wastewater treatment lagoons. In addition, FirstEnergy has recognized conditional retirement obligations, primarily for asbestos remediation.
The following table summarizes the changes to the ARO balances during 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | |
ARO Reconciliation | | (In millions) |
| | |
Balance, January 1, 2022 | | $ | 179 | |
Changes in timing and amount of estimated cash flows | | (2) | |
Liabilities settled | | (6) | |
Accretion | | 14 | |
| | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | | $ | 185 | |
Changes in timing and amount of estimated cash flows | | 10 | |
Liabilities settled | | (2) | |
Accretion | | 16 | |
| | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | | $ | 209 | |
In April 2015, the EPA finalized regulations for the disposal of CCRs (non-hazardous), establishing national standards for landfill design, structural integrity design and assessment criteria for surface impoundments, groundwater monitoring and protection procedures and other operational and reporting procedures to assure the safe disposal of CCRs from electric generating plants. On September 13, 2017, the EPA announced that it would reconsider certain provisions of the final regulations. On July 29, 2020, the EPA published a final rule again revising the date that certain CCR impoundments must cease accepting waste and initiate closure to April 11, 2021. The final rule allowed for an extension of the closure deadline based on meeting identified site-specific criteria. On November 30, 2020, AE Supply submitted a closure deadline extension request to the EPA seeking to extend the cease accepting waste date for the McElroy's Run CCR impoundment facility through the end of the first quarter of 2024, which request is pending technical review by the EPA. AE Supply continues to operate McElroy’s Run as a disposal facility for Pleasants Power Station, which is owned and operated by a non-affiliate.
Jointly Owned Plants
AGC owns an undivided 16.25% interest (487 MWs) in the 3,003 MW Bath County pumped-storage, hydroelectric station in Virginia, operated by the 60% owner, VEPCO, a non-affiliated utility. Total property, plant and equipment includes $145 million representing AGC's share in this facility as of December 31, 2023. AGC is obligated to pay its share of the costs of this jointly owned facility in the same proportion as its ownership interests using its own financing. AGC's share of direct expenses of the joint plant is included in operating expenses on FirstEnergy's Consolidated Statements of Income. AGC provides the generation capacity from this facility to its owner, MP, which is recovered from the ENEC.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Issued Pronouncements - The following new authoritative accounting guidance issued by the FASB has not yet been adopted. Unless otherwise indicated, FirstEnergy is currently assessing the impact such guidance may have on its financial statements and disclosures, as well as the potential to early adopt where applicable. FirstEnergy has assessed other FASB issuances of new standards not described below based upon the current expectation that such new standards will not significantly impact FirstEnergy's financial reporting.
ASU 2022-03, "Fair Value Measurements of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions " (Issued in June 2022): ASU 2022-03 clarifies current guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to contractual restrictions that prohibit the sale of an equity security, and introduces new disclosure requirements for those equity securities subject to contractual restrictions. For FirstEnergy, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted.
ASU 2023-07, "Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures " (Issued in November 2023): ASU 2023-07 enhances interim disclosure requirements, clarifies circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple segment measures of profit or loss, provides new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable segment, and contain other disclosure requirements. Disclosure requirements within ASU 2023-07 include disclosing significant segment expenses by reportable segment if they are regularly provided to the CODM and included in each reported measure of segment profit or loss. Disclosures are required on both an annual and an interim basis. For FirstEnergy, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted.
ASU 2023-09, "Income taxes (Topic 280): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures " (Issued in December 2023): ASU 2023-09 enhances disclosures primarily related to existing rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information to help investors better assess how a company’s operations and related tax risks and tax planning and operational opportunities affect the tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. For FirstEnergy, the guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The amendments within ASU 2023-09 are to be applied on a prospective basis, with retrospective application permitted.
2. REVENUE
FirstEnergy accounts for revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Revenue from leases, financial instruments, other contractual rights or obligations and other revenues that are not from contracts with customers are outside the scope of the standard and accounted for under other existing GAAP.
FirstEnergy has elected to exclude sales taxes and other similar taxes collected on behalf of third parties from revenue as prescribed in the standard. As a result, tax collections and remittances are excluded from recognition in the income statement and instead recorded through the balance sheet. Excise and gross receipts taxes that are assessed on FirstEnergy are not subject to the election and are included in revenue. FirstEnergy has elected the optional invoice practical expedient for most of its revenues and utilizes the optional short-term contract exemption for transmission revenues due to the annual establishment of revenue requirements, which eliminates the need to provide certain revenue disclosures regarding unsatisfied performance obligations.
FirstEnergy’s revenues are primarily derived from electric service provided by the Utilities and Transmission Companies.
Regulated Distribution
The Regulated Distribution segment distributes electricity through FirstEnergy’s utility operating companies and also controls 3,580 MWs of regulated electric generation capacity located primarily in West Virginia and Virginia. Each of the Utilities earns revenue from state-regulated rate tariffs under which it provides distribution services to residential, commercial and industrial customers in its service territory. The Utilities are obligated under the regulated construct to deliver power to customers reliably, as it is needed, which creates an implied monthly contract with the end-use customer. See Note 13, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information on rate recovery mechanisms. Distribution and electric revenues are recognized over time as electricity is distributed and delivered to the customer and the customers consume the electricity immediately as delivery occurs.
Retail generation sales relate to POLR, SOS, SSO and default service requirements in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland, as well as generation sales in West Virginia that are regulated by the WVPSC. Certain of the Utilities have default service obligations to provide power to non-shopping customers who have elected to continue to receive service under regulated retail tariffs. The volume of these sales varies depending on the level of shopping that occurs. Supply plans vary by state and by service territory. Default service for the Ohio Companies, Pennsylvania Companies, JCP&L and PE’s Maryland jurisdiction are provided through a competitive procurement process approved by each state’s respective commission. Retail generation revenues are recognized over time as electricity is delivered and consumed immediately by the customer.
Wholesale sales primarily consist of generation and capacity sales into the PJM market from FirstEnergy’s regulated electric generation capacity and NUGs. Certain of the Utilities may also purchase power in the PJM markets to supply power to their customers. Generally, these power sales from generation and purchases to serve load are netted hourly and reported as either revenues or purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Income based on whether the entity was a net seller or buyer each hour. Capacity revenues are recognized ratably over the PJM planning year at prices cleared in the annual PJM Reliability Pricing Model Base Residual Auction and Incremental Auctions. Capacity purchases and sales through PJM capacity auctions are reported within revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain capacity income (bonuses) and charges (penalties) related to the availability of units that have cleared in the auctions are unknown and not recorded in revenue until, and unless, they occur.
The Utilities’ distribution customers are metered on a cycle basis. An estimate of unbilled revenues is calculated to recognize electric service provided from the last meter reading through the end of the month. This estimate includes many factors, among which are historical customer usage, load profiles, estimated weather impacts, customer shopping activity and prices in effect for each class of customer. In each accounting period, the Utilities accrue the estimated unbilled amount as revenue and reverse the related prior period estimate. Customer payments vary by state but are generally due within 30 days.
ASC 606 excludes industry-specific accounting guidance for recognizing revenue from Alternative Revenue Programs as these programs represent contracts between the utility and its regulators, as opposed to customers. Therefore, revenues from these programs are not within the scope of ASC 606 and regulated utilities are permitted to continue to recognize such revenues in accordance with existing practice but are presented separately from revenue arising from contracts with customers.
Regulated Transmission
The Regulated Transmission segment provides transmission infrastructure owned and operated by the Transmission Companies and certain of FirstEnergy's utilities (JCP&L, MP, PE and WP) to transmit electricity from generation sources to distribution facilities. The segment's revenues are derived from primarily forward-looking formula rates. See Note 13, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.
Forward-looking formula rates recover costs that the regulatory agencies determine are permitted to be recovered and provide a return on transmission capital investment. Under forward-looking formula rates, the revenue requirement is updated annually based on a projected rate base and projected costs, which is subject to an annual true-up based on rate base and actual costs. Revenues and cash receipts for the stand-ready obligation of providing transmission service are recognized ratably over time.
The following represents a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |
(In millions) | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | |
Regulated Distribution | | | | | | |
Retail generation and distribution services(1) | | | | | | |
Residential | $ | 6,583 | | | $ | 6,180 | | | $ | 5,713 | | |
Commercial | 2,600 | | | 2,499 | | | 2,284 | | |
Industrial | 1,298 | | | 1,338 | | | 1,091 | | |
Street lighting/Other | 105 | | | 85 | | | 75 | | |
Wholesale | 228 | | | 494 | | 362 | |
Other revenue from contracts with customers(2) | 113 | | | 104 | | 119 | |
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 10,927 | | | 10,700 | | | 9,644 | | |
Alternative Revenue Program(3) | — | | | — | | | (27) | | |
Other revenue unrelated to contracts with customers(4) | 111 | | | 101 | | 94 | |
Total Regulated Distribution | $ | 11,038 | | | $ | 10,801 | | | $ | 9,711 | | |
| | | | | | |
Regulated Transmission | | | | | | |
ATSI | $ | 968 | | | $ | 912 | | | $ | 799 | | |
TrAIL | 279 | | | 270 | | | 233 | | |
MAIT | 395 | | | 340 | | | 288 | | |
JCP&L | 205 | | | 203 | | | 164 | | |
MP, PE and WP | 202 | | | 138 | | 124 | |
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 2,049 | | | 1,863 | | | 1,608 | | |
Other revenue unrelated to contracts with customers | 5 | | | 5 | | | 10 | | |
Total Regulated Transmission | $ | 2,054 | | | $ | 1,868 | | | $ | 1,618 | | |
| | | | | | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments(5) | | | | | | |
Wholesale | $ | 11 | | | $ | 27 | | | $ | 14 | | |
Retail generation and distribution services(5) | (181) | | | (186) | | | (154) | | |
Other revenue unrelated to contracts with customers(5) | (52) | | | (51) | | | (57) | | |
Total Corporate/Other and Reconciling | $ | (222) | | | $ | (210) | | | $ | (197) | | |
| | | | | | |
FirstEnergy Total Revenues | $ | 12,870 | | | $ | 12,459 | | | $ | 11,132 | | |
(1) Includes approximately $58 million and $38 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, of customer refunds associated with the Ohio Stipulation that became effective in December 2021. See Note 13, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion.
(2) Primarily includes amounts collected from customers to administer and repay securitization bonds and pole attachment revenue.
(3) Reflects amount the Ohio Companies refunded to customers that was previously collected under decoupling mechanisms, with interest.
(4) Primarily includes late payment charges and revenue from derivatives.
(5) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues.
RECEIVABLES
Receivables from contracts with customers include retail electric sales and distribution deliveries to residential, commercial and industrial customers of the Utilities. Billed and unbilled customer receivables as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, are included below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
Customer Receivables | | 2023 | | 2022 | |
| | (In millions) |
Billed(1) | | $ | 717 | | | $ | 674 | | |
Unbilled | | 665 | | | 781 | | |
| | 1,382 | | | 1,455 | | |
| | | | | |
Less: Uncollectible Reserve | | 64 | | | 137 | | |
Total Customer Receivables | | $ | 1,318 | | | $ | 1,318 | | |
(1) Includes approximately $288 million and $290 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, that are past due by greater than 30 days.
The allowance for uncollectible customer receivables is based on historical loss information comprised of a rolling 36-month average net write-off percentage of revenues, in conjunction with a qualitative assessment of elements that impact the collectability of receivables to determine if allowances for uncollectible customer receivables should be further adjusted in accordance with the accounting guidance for credit losses.
FirstEnergy reviews its allowance for uncollectible customer receivables utilizing a quantitative and qualitative assessment. Management contemplates available current information such as changes in economic factors, regulatory matters, industry trends, customer credit factors, amount of receivable balances that are past-due, payment options and programs available to customers, and the methods that the Utilities are able to utilize to ensure payment. This analysis includes consideration of the outbreak of the pandemic and the impact on customer receivable balances outstanding and write-offs since the pandemic began and subsequent economic slowdown. FirstEnergy’s uncollectible risk on PJM receivables, resulting from transmission and wholesale sales, is minimal due to the nature of PJM’s settlement process and as a result there is no current allowance for doubtful accounts.
During 2023, various regulatory actions, including extended installment plans, continue to impact the level of past due balances in certain states, resulting in the allowances for uncollectible customer receivables to remain elevated above 2019 pre-pandemic levels. However, normal collection activity has resumed, and arrears levels continue to decline towards pre-pandemic levels. As a result, FirstEnergy recognized a $77 million decrease to its allowance during 2023, of which $41 million was applied to existing deferred regulatory assets.
Activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts on receivables for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | |
Customer Receivables: | | | | | | |
Beginning of year balance | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 159 | | | $ | 164 | |
Charged to income(1) | | 8 | | | 59 | | | 54 | |
Charged to other accounts(2) | | 34 | | | 62 | | | 42 | |
Write-offs | | (115) | | | (143) | | | (101) | |
End of year balance | | $ | 64 | | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 159 | |
| | | | | | |
Other Receivables: | | | | | | |
Beginning of year balance | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 26 | |
Charged to income | | 7 | | | 4 | | | 3 | |
Charged to other accounts(2) | | (1) | | | 4 | | | 3 | |
Write-offs | | (2) | | | (7) | | | (22) | |
End of year balance | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 10 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(1) Customer receivable amounts charged to income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, include approximately $(15) million, $11 million, and $12 million, respectively, deferred for future recovery (refund).
(2) Represents recoveries and reinstatements of accounts previously written off for uncollectible accounts.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
EPS is calculated by dividing earnings attributable to FE by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant period as the denominator. The denominator for diluted EPS of common stock reflects the weighted average of common shares outstanding plus the potential additional common shares that could result if dilutive securities and other agreements to issue common stock were exercised.
Diluted EPS reflects the dilutive effect of potential common shares from share-based awards and convertible securities. The dilutive effect of outstanding share-based awards was computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon the exercise of the award would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price for the period. The dilutive effect of the 2026 Convertible Notes, as further discussed in Note 11, "Capitalization" under Long-term debt and other long-term obligations, is computed using the if-converted method.
The following table reconciles basic and diluted EPS attributable to FE:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted EPS of Common Stock | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
(In millions, except per share amounts) | | | | | | |
Earnings Attributable to FE - continuing operations | | $ | 1,123 | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | 1,239 | |
Earnings Attributable to FE - discontinued operations, net of tax | | (21) | | | — | | | 44 | |
Earnings Attributable to FE | | $ | 1,102 | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | 1,283 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Share Count information: | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding | | 573 | | | 571 | | | 545 | |
Assumed exercise of dilutive share-based awards | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding | | 574 | | | 572 | | | 546 | |
| | | | | | |
EPS Attributable to FE: | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations, basic | | $ | 1.96 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 2.27 | |
Discontinued operations, basic | | (0.04) | | | — | | | 0.08 | |
Basic EPS | | $ | 1.92 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 2.35 | |
| | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations, diluted | | $ | 1.96 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 2.27 | |
Discontinued operations, diluted | | (0.04) | | | — | | | 0.08 | |
Diluted EPS | | $ | 1.92 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 2.35 | |
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, there was no material amount of shares excluded from the calculation of diluted shares outstanding, as their inclusion would be antidilutive.
The dilutive effect of the 2026 Convertible Notes is limited to the conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the 2026 Convertible Notes being converted. For the year ended December 31, 2023, there was no dilutive effect resulting from the 2026 Convertible Notes as the average market price of FE shares of common stock was below the initial conversion price of $46.81 per share. See Note 11, "Capitalization" for additional details on the 2026 Convertible Notes that were issued during the second quarter of 2023.
4. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The changes in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, for FirstEnergy are shown in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (In millions) |
Gains & Losses on Cash Flow Hedges(1) | | | | | | |
AOCI Balance, January 1, | | $ | — | | | $ | (7) | | | $ | (8) | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | | 2 | | | 9 | | | 1 | |
Income tax on other comprehensive income | | — | | | 2 | | | — | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | 2 | | | 7 | | | 1 | |
AOCI Balance, December 31, | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (7) | |
| | | | | | |
Defined Benefit Pension & OPEB Plans(2)(3) | | | | | | |
AOCI Balance, January 1, | | $ | (14) | | | $ | (8) | | | $ | 3 | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | | (6) | | | (9) | | | (14) | |
Income tax benefits on other comprehensive loss | | (1) | | | (3) | | | (3) | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | (5) | | | (6) | | | (11) | |
AOCI Balance, December 31, | | $ | (19) | | | $ | (14) | | | $ | (8) | |
| | | | | | |
Total FirstEnergy Corp. AOCI | | | | | | |
AOCI Balance, January 1, | | $ | (14) | | | $ | (15) | | | $ | (5) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | (3) | | | 1 | | | (10) | |
AOCI Balance, December 31, | | $ | (17) | | | $ | (14) | | | $ | (15) | |
(1) Relates to previous cash flow hedges used to hedge fixed rate long-term debt securities prior to their issuance. Amounts reclassified from AOCI affects Interest expense line item in Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Amortization of prior service costs are reported within Miscellaneous income, net within Other Income (Expense) on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Components are included in the computation of net periodic cost (credits), see Note 5, "Pension and Other Postemployment Benefits," for additional details.
(3) Income tax (benefits) on other comprehensive income (loss) affects Income taxes line item in Consolidated Statements of Income.
5. PENSION AND OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
FirstEnergy provides noncontributory qualified defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all of its employees and non-qualified pension plans that cover certain employees. The plans provide defined benefits based on years of service and compensation levels. Under the cash-balance portion of the pension plan (for employees hired on or after January 1, 2014), FirstEnergy makes contributions to eligible employee retirement accounts based on a pay credit and an interest credit. In addition, FirstEnergy provides a minimum amount of noncontributory life insurance to retired employees in addition to optional contributory insurance. Health care benefits, which include certain employee contributions, deductibles and co-payments, are also available upon retirement to certain employees, their dependents and, under certain circumstances, their survivors. FirstEnergy recognizes the expected cost of providing pension and OPEB to employees and their beneficiaries and covered dependents from the time employees are hired until they become eligible to receive those benefits. FirstEnergy also has obligations to former or inactive employees after employment, but before retirement, for disability-related benefits.
On May 9, 2023, FirstEnergy announced a voluntary retirement program for eligible non-bargaining employees, known as the PEER. More than 65% of eligible employees, totaling approximately 450 employees, accepted the PEER, which included lump sum compensation equivalent to severance benefits, healthcare continuation costs and a temporary pension enhancement. Most PEER participating employees departed in 2023. The temporary pension enhancement and healthcare continuation costs are classified as special termination costs within net periodic benefit costs (credits). In addition to the PEER, FirstEnergy notified and involuntarily separated approximately 90 employees on May 9, 2023. Management expects the cost savings resulting from these initiatives to support FirstEnergy’s growth plans.
FirstEnergy’s pension funding policy is based on actuarial computations using the projected unit credit method. On May 12, 2023, FirstEnergy made a $750 million voluntary cash contribution to the qualified pension plan. FirstEnergy does not currently expect to have a required contribution to the pension plan until 2028, which based on various assumptions, including an expected rate of return on assets of 8.0%, is expected to be approximately $260 million. However, FirstEnergy may elect to contribute to the pension plan voluntarily.
Pension and OPEB costs are affected by employee demographics (including age, compensation levels and employment periods), the level of contributions made to the plans and earnings on plan assets. Pension and OPEB costs may also be affected by changes in key assumptions, including anticipated rates of return on plan assets, the discount rates and health care
trend rates used in determining the projected benefit obligations for pension and OPEB costs. FirstEnergy uses a December 31 measurement date for its pension and OPEB plans or whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement. The fair value of the plan assets represents the actual market value as of the measurement date.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actuarial Assumptions | | Pension | | OPEB |
| 2023(2) | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2023(2) | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assumptions Related to Benefit Obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount rate | | 5.05 | % | | 5.23 | % | | 3.02 | % | | 4.97 | % | | 5.16 | % | | 2.84 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | | 4.30 | % | | 4.30 | % | | 4.10 | % | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
Cash balance weighted average interest crediting rate | | 4.94 | % | | 4.04 | % | | 2.57 | % | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assumptions Related to Benefit Costs:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effective rate for interest on benefit obligations | | 5.10% / 4.80% | | 2.44 | % | | 1.94 | % | | 5.06 | % | | 2.18 | % | | 1.66 | % |
Effective rate for service costs | | 5.34% / 5.11% | | 3.28 | % | | 3.10 | % | | 5.41 | % | | 3.41 | % | | 3.03 | % |
Effective rate for interest on service costs | | 5.22% / 4.94% | | 2.96 | % | | 2.58 | % | | 5.33 | % | | 3.24 | % | | 2.83 | % |
Expected return on plan assets | | 8.00 | % | | 7.50 | % | | 7.50 | % | | 7.00 | % | | 7.50 | % | | 7.50 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | | 4.30 | % | | 4.10 | % | | 4.10 | % | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Health care cost trend rate assumed (pre/post-Medicare) | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | 7.00%- 6.50% | | 6.00%- 5.50%
| | 5.75%- 5.25% |
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend rate) | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % |
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | 2033 | | 2029 | | 2028 |
(1) Excludes impact of pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustments.
(2) As a result of the interim plan remeasurement during 2023, there were different rates in effect from January 1, 2023, through April 30, 2023 compared to May 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
Discount Rate - In selecting an assumed discount rate, FirstEnergy considers currently available rates of return on high-quality fixed income investments expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension and OPEB obligations. The assumed rates of return on plan assets consider historical market returns and economic forecasts for the types of investments held by FirstEnergy’s pension trusts. The long-term rate of return is developed considering the portfolio’s asset allocation strategy. FirstEnergy utilizes a spot rate approach in the estimation of the components of benefit cost by applying specific spot rates along the full yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows.
Expected Return on Plan Assets - The expected return on pension and OPEB assets is based on input from investment consultants, including the trusts’ asset allocation targets, the historical performance of risk-based and fixed income securities and other factors. The gains or losses generated as a result of the difference between expected and actual returns on plan assets is recognized as a pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for remeasurement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension and OPEB Returns | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Actual gains or (losses) on plan assets - $ millions | | $ | 751 | | | $ | (1,830) | | | $ | 689 | |
Actual gains or (losses) on plan assets - % | | 11.2 | % | | (19.1) | % | | 7.9 | % |
| | | | | | |
Expected return on plan assets - $ millions | | $ | 601 | | | $ | 696 | | | $ | 688 | |
Expected return on plan assets - % | | 8.00% for pension
7.00% for OPEB | | 7.50 | % | | 7.50 | % |
Mortality Rates - During 2023, the Society of Actuaries elected not to release a new mortality improvement scale due to data available being severely impacted by COVID-19. It was determined that the Pri-2012 mortality table with projection scale MP-2021, actuarially adjusted to reflect increased mortality due to the ongoing impact of COVID-19 was most appropriate and such was utilized to determine the obligation as of December 31, 2023, for the FirstEnergy pension and OPEB plans. This adjustment acknowledges COVID-19 cannot be eradicated and assumes reductions in other causes will not offset future COVID-19 deaths enough to produce a normal level of improvements.
Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Credits) - In addition to service costs, interest on obligations, expected return on plan assets, and prior service costs, FirstEnergy recognizes in net periodic benefit costs a pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment for the change in the fair value of plan assets and net actuarial gains and losses annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement. Service costs, net of capitalization, are reported within Other operating expenses on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Non-service costs, other than the pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment, which is separately shown, are reported within Miscellaneous income, net, within Other Income (Expense) on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Credits) for the Years Ended December 31, | | Pension | | OPEB |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (In millions) |
Service cost(1) | | $ | 139 | | | $ | 184 | | | $ | 195 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 4 | |
Interest cost | | 428 | | | 273 | | | 226 | | | 21 | | | 11 | | | 11 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (570) | | | (657) | | | (652) | | | (31) | | | (39) | | | (36) | |
Amortization of prior service costs (credits) | | 2 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | (8) | | | (11) | | | (17) | |
Special termination benefits(2) | | 21 | | | — | | | — | | | 8 | | | — | | | — | |
Pension & OPEB mark-to-market | | 108 | | | (98) | | | (253) | | | (30) | | | 26 | | | (129) | |
Net periodic benefit costs (credits) | | $ | 128 | | | $ | (296) | | | $ | (481) | | | $ | (38) | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | (167) | |
(1) Includes amounts capitalized.
(2) Related to benefits provided in connection with the PEER.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, approximately $36 million, $15 million and $(31) million, respectively, of the annual pension and OPEB mark-to-market charges (credits) were allocated to the Regulated Transmission companies under forward-looking formula rates, and expected to be refunded or recovered through formula transmission rates.
FirstEnergy recognizes a pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment for the change in fair value of plan assets and net actuarial gains and losses annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for remeasurement. The size of the voluntary contribution made on May 12, 2023, in relation to total pension assets triggered a remeasurement of the pension plan, and as a result, FirstEnergy recognized a non-cash, pre-tax pension mark-to-market adjustment gain of approximately $59 million in the second quarter of 2023. FirstEnergy elected the practical expedient to remeasure pension plan assets and obligations as of April 30, 2023, which is the month-end closest to the date of the voluntary contribution. The pension mark-to-market adjustment primarily reflects higher than expected return on assets, partially offset by a 29 basis points decrease in the discount rate used to measure benefit obligations.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, FirstEnergy recognized a $137 million pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment loss, primarily reflecting lower than expected return on assets, partially offset by an 11 basis points increase in the discount rate used to measure pension benefit obligations from May 1, 2023, and the gain associated with the pension lift-out, as described below.
In December 2023, FirstEnergy, executed a lift-out transaction with Banner Life Insurance Company and Reinsurance Group of America that transferred approximately $683 million of plan assets and $719 million of plan obligations, associated with approximately 1,900 former FES and FENOC employees, who will assume future and full responsibility to fund and administer their benefit payments. There was no change to the pension benefits for any participants as a result of the transfer. The transaction was funded by pension plan assets and resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $36 million, which was included in the fourth quarter 2023 pension mark-to-market charge. FirstEnergy expects that the transaction further de-risked potential volatility with the pension plan assets and liabilities, and FirstEnergy will continue to evaluate other lift-outs in the future based on market and other conditions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension | | OPEB |
Obligations/Funded Status - Qualified and Non-Qualified Plans | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (In millions) |
Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation as of January 1 | | $ | 8,828 | | | $ | 11,479 | | $ | 439 | | | $ | 549 |
Service cost | | 139 | | | 184 | | 2 | | | 3 |
Interest cost | | 428 | | | 273 | | 21 | | | 11 |
Plan participants’ contributions | | — | | | — | | 4 | | | 3 |
| | | | | | | | |
Special termination benefits | | 21 | | | — | | 8 | | | — |
Medicare retiree drug subsidy | | — | | | — | | — | | | 1 |
Lift-out transaction | | (719) | | | — | | — | | | — |
Actuarial loss (gain) | | 256 | | | (2,515) | | 8 | | | (83) |
Benefits paid | | (590) | | | (593) | | (41) | | | (45) |
Benefit obligation as of December 31 | | $ | 8,363 | | | $ | 8,828 | | $ | 441 | | | $ | 439 |
| | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of plan assets: | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1 | | $ | 6,693 | | | $ | 9,020 | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 548 |
Actual return on plan assets | | 682 | | | (1,760) | | 69 | | | (70) |
Lift-out transaction | | (683) | | | — | | — | | | — |
Company contributions | | 777 | | | 26 | | 24 | | | 24 |
Plan participants’ contributions | | — | | | — | | 4 | | | 3 |
Benefits paid | | (590) | | | (593) | | (41) | | | (45) |
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31 | | $ | 6,879 | | | $ | 6,693 | | $ | 516 | | | $ | 460 |
| | | | | | | | |
Funded Status: | | | | | | | | |
Qualified plan | | $ | (1,090) | | | $ | (1,734) | | $ | — | | | $ | — |
Non-qualified plans | | (394) | | | (401) | | — | | | — |
Funded Status (Net liability as of December 31) | | $ | (1,484) | | | $ | (2,135) | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 21 |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated benefit obligation | | $ | 7,324 | | | $ | 8,500 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Amounts Recognized in AOCI: | | | | | | | | |
Prior service cost (credit) | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | (10) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The following tables set forth pension financial assets that are accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10, "Fair Value Measurements," for a description of each level of the fair value hierarchy. There were no significant transfers between levels during 2023 and 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2023 | | Asset Allocation |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| | (In millions) | | |
Cash and short-term securities | | $ | — | | | $ | 755 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 755 | | | 11 | % |
Public equity | | 1,811 | | | 4 | | | — | | | 1,815 | | | 26 | % |
Fixed income | | — | | | 1,784 | | | — | | | 1,784 | | | 26 | % |
Derivatives | | 2 | | | 37 | | | — | | | 39 | | | — | % |
Total(1) | | $ | 1,813 | | | $ | 2,580 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,393 | | | 63 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Private - equity and debt funds(2) | | | | | | | | 1,296 | | | 19 | % |
Insurance-linked securities(2) | | | | | | | | 107 | | | 2 | % |
Hedge funds(2) | | | | | | | | 410 | | | 6 | % |
Real estate funds(2) | | | | | | | | 721 | | | 10 | % |
Total Investments | | | | | | | | $ | 6,927 | | | 100 | % |
(1) Excludes $(48) million as of December 31, 2023, of receivables, payables, taxes, cash collateral for derivatives and accrued income associated with financial instruments reflected within the fair value table.
(2) NAV used as a practical expedient to approximate fair value.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 | | Asset Allocation |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| | (In millions) | | |
Cash and short-term securities | | $ | — | | | $ | 714 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 714 | | | 11 | % |
Public equity | | 1,871 | | | 216 | | | — | | | 2,087 | | | 33 | % |
Fixed income | | — | | | 942 | | | — | | | 942 | | | 15 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | | (38) | | | 2 | | | — | | | (36) | | | (1) | % |
Total(1) | | $ | 1,833 | | | $ | 1,874 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,707 | | | 58 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Private - equity and debt funds(2) | | | | | | | | 1,061 | | | 17 | % |
Insurance-linked securities(2) | | | | | | | | 159 | | | 3 | % |
Hedge funds(2) | | | | | | | | 563 | | | 9 | % |
Real estate funds(2) | | | | | | | | 853 | | | 13 | % |
Total Investments | | | | | | | | $ | 6,343 | | | 100 | % |
(1) Excludes $350 million as of December 31, 2022, of receivables, payables, taxes and accrued income associated with financial instruments reflected within the fair value table.
(2) NAV used as a practical expedient to approximate fair value.
Private – equity and debt funds: Private equity and private debt funds primarily include limited partnerships that invest in equity or directly originated senior loans of high-quality middle market operating companies. Distributions are received periodically through the liquidation of underlying assets in each fund. For most private equity and debt funds, immediate access to capital at the limited partner’s discretion is not available and such funds prevent full redemption and return of capital until fund liquidation. The purpose of each fund is to maximize total return of capital with an emphasis on minimizing default risk. Each fund’s NAV is made available to fund participants quarterly.
Insurance Linked Securities funds: The insurance linked securities funds invest in securities which indirectly participate in portfolios of reinsurance and retrocession contracts which primarily cover catastrophe property risks. Redemptions can be achieved with 90-day notices with gating factors that may apply. The purpose of these investments is to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns that are demonstrably uncorrelated with traditional asset classes. Each fund’s NAV is made available to fund participants monthly.
Hedge funds: The hedge funds invest in a combination of long and short equity, multi-strategy, global macro and structured credit strategies. Redemptions can be achieved with 90-day notices with gating factors that may apply. The purpose of these investments is to deliver diversified risk-adjusted returns to traditional asset classes. Each fund’s NAV is made available to fund participants monthly.
Real estate funds: The real estate funds primarily invest in U.S commercial real estate markets that include office, residential, retail, industrial, life science/lab space, storage and student housing. The investment values of the real estate properties are determined on a quarterly basis by independent market appraisers hired by the board of directors of each fund. Distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying investments of the fund are liquidated. Each investor’s ability to withdraw capital from certain funds may be limited depending on whether a queue has been established. The purpose of each fund is to invest in real estate and real estate related assets that generate a total return from current income and capital appreciation which exceeds the applicable fund’s index. Each fund’s NAV is made available to fund participants quarterly.
As of December 31, 2023, and 2022, the OPEB trust investments measured at fair value were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2023 | | Asset Allocation |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| | (In millions) | | |
Cash and short-term securities | | $ | — | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 100 | | | 19 | % |
Public equity | | 258 | | | — | | | — | | | 258 | | | 50 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed income | | — | | | 158 | | | — | | | 158 | | | 31 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 258 | | | $ | 258 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 516 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 | | Asset Allocation |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| | (In millions) | | |
Cash and short-term securities | | $ | — | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 87 | | | 19 | % |
Public equity | | 217 | | | — | | | — | | | 217 | | | 47 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed income: | | — | | | 157 | | | — | | | 157 | | | 34 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total(1) | | $ | 217 | | | $ | 244 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 461 | | | 100 | % |
(1) Excludes $(1) million as of December 31, 2022, of receivables, payables, taxes and accrued income associated with financial instruments reflected within the fair value table.
FirstEnergy’s target asset allocations for its pension and OPEB trust portfolios for 2023 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Target Asset Allocations |
| | Pension | | OPEB |
Equities | | 30 | % | | 50 | % |
Fixed income | | 28.5 | % | | 50 | % |
Alternative investments | | 5 | % | | — | % |
Real estate | | 10 | % | | — | % |
Private - equity and debt funds | | 20 | % | | — | % |
Cash and derivatives | | 6.5 | % | | — | % |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
FirstEnergy follows a total return investment approach using a mix of equities, fixed income and other available investments while taking into account the pension plan liabilities to optimize the long-term return on plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalization funds. Other assets such as real estate and private equity are used to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however, derivatives are not used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of the underlying investments. Investment risk is measured and monitored on a continuing basis through periodic investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and periodic asset/liability studies.
Taking into account estimated employee future service, FirstEnergy expects to make the following benefit payments from plan assets and other payments, net of participant contribution.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | OPEB |
| | Pension | | Benefit Payments | | Subsidy Receipts |
| | (In millions) |
2024 | | $ | 554 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | (1) | |
2025 | | 562 | | | 41 | | | (1) | |
2026 | | 564 | | | 40 | | | — | |
2027 | | 569 | | | 39 | | | — | |
2028 | | 571 | | | 37 | | | — | |
Years 2029-2033 | | 2,877 | | | 164 | | | (2) | |
6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
FirstEnergy grants stock-based awards through the ICP 2020, primarily in the form of restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units. No shares are available for future grants or issuance under ICP 2015.
The ICP 2020 and ICP 2015 include shareholder authorization to each issue 10 million shares of common stock or their equivalent. Shares not issued due to forfeitures or cancellations originally granted through the ICP 2015 may be added back to the ICP 2020. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 10.1 million shares were available for future grants under the ICP 2020 assuming maximum performance metrics are achieved for the outstanding cycles of restricted stock units. Shares granted under the ICP 2020 are issued from authorized but unissued common stock. Vesting periods for stock-based awards range from less
than a year, primarily due to the issuance of prorated awards to newly hired executives, to four years, with the majority of awards having a vesting period of three years. FirstEnergy also issues stock through its 401(k) savings plan and DCPD.
Currently, FirstEnergy records the compensation costs for stock-based compensation awards that will be paid in stock over the vesting period based on the fair value on the grant date. FirstEnergy accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
FirstEnergy adjusts the compensation costs for stock-based compensation awards that will be paid in cash based on changes in the fair value of the award as of each reporting date. FirstEnergy records the actual tax benefit realized from tax deductions when awards are exercised or settled. Actual income tax benefits realized during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, were $6 million, $8 million and $10 million, respectively. The income tax effects of awards are recognized in the income statement when the awards vest, are settled or are forfeited.
Stock-based compensation costs and the amount of stock-based compensation costs capitalized related to FirstEnergy plans for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, are included in the following tables:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
Stock-based Compensation Plan | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (In millions) |
Restricted stock units | | $ | 39 | | | $ | 55 | | | $ | 40 | |
Restricted stock | | 5 | | | 3 | | | 2 | |
401(k) savings plan | | 38 | | | 36 | | | 35 | |
EDCP & DCPD | | 1 | | | 7 | | | 13 | |
Total | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 90 | |
Stock-based compensation costs, net of amounts capitalized | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 43 | |
Income tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation plan expense were $6 million, $8 million and $5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units
Two-thirds of each performance-based restricted stock unit award will be paid in stock and one-third will be paid in cash. Restricted stock units payable in stock provide the participant the right to receive, at the end of the period of restriction, a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of stock units set forth in the agreement, subject to adjustment based on FirstEnergy's performance relative to financial and operational performance targets applicable to each award. The grant date fair market value of the stock portion of the restricted stock unit award is measured based on the average of the high and low prices of FE common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units include a performance metric consisting of a relative total shareholder return modifier utilizing the S&P 500 Utility Index as a comparator group. The estimated grant date fair value for these awards is calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation method. Beginning with awards granted in 2022, restricted stock units include a relative total shareholder return as a performance metric, weighted at 35%, utilizing the S&P 500 Utility Index as a comparator group. The estimated grant date fair value for these awards is also calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation method. In addition, outstanding awards are subject to an absolute total shareholder return, if FirstEnergy's total shareholder return is negative for the three-year cumulative performance period, restricted stock unit awards will be capped at a payout of 100%.
Restricted stock units payable in cash provide the participant the right to receive cash based on the number of stock units set forth in the agreement and value of the equivalent number of shares of FE common stock as of the vesting date. The cash portion of the restricted stock unit award is considered a liability award, which is remeasured each period based on FE's stock price and projected performance adjustments. The liability recorded for the portion of performance-based restricted stock units payable in cash in the future as of December 31, 2023, was $22 million. During 2023, approximately $6 million was paid in relation to the cash portion of restricted stock unit obligations that vested in 2023.
The vesting period for the performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted in 2023, 2022 and 2021, were each three years. Dividend equivalents are received on the restricted stock units and are reinvested in additional restricted stock units and subject to the same performance conditions as the underlying award.
Restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2023, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock Unit Activity | | Shares (in millions) | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share) |
Nonvested as of January 1, 2023 | | 1.9 | | | $ | 41.57 | |
Granted in 2023 | | 1.4 | | | 38.36 | |
Forfeited in 2023 | | (0.2) | | | 39.32 | |
Vested in 2023(1) | | (0.6) | | | 39.38 | |
Nonvested as of December 31, 2023 | | 2.5 | | | $ | 38.82 | |
(1) Excludes dividend equivalents of approximately 63 thousand shares earned during vesting period.
The weighted-average fair value per share of awards granted in 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $38.36, $41.49 and $35.50 per share, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, the fair value of restricted stock units vested was $24 million, $26 million, and $34 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, there was approximately $32 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted for restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately three years.
Restricted Stock
Certain employees receive awards of FE restricted stock (as opposed to "units" with the right to receive shares at the end of the restriction period) subject to restrictions that lapse over a defined period of time. The fair value of restricted stock is measured based on the average of the high and low prices of FE common stock on the date of grant. Dividends are received on the restricted stock and are reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock, subject to the vesting conditions of the underlying award. Restricted stock activity for the year ended 2023, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock Activity | | Shares (in millions) | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share) |
Nonvested as of January 1, 2023 | | 0.20 | | | $ | 42.35 | |
Granted in 2023 | | 0.30 | | | 37.42 | |
Forfeited in 2023 | | (0.02) | | | 36.86 | |
Vested in 2023 | | (0.02) | | | 39.45 | |
Nonvested as of December 31, 2023 | | 0.46 | | | $ | 39.57 | |
The weighted average vesting period for restricted stock granted in 2023 was 2.4 years. As of December 31, 2023, there was $11 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately four years.
401(k) Savings Plan
In each of 2023 and 2022, approximately 1 million shares of FE common stock, respectively, were issued and contributed to employee participants' accounts.
EDCP
Under the EDCP, certain employees can defer a portion of their compensation, including base salary, annual incentive awards and/or long-term incentive awards, into unfunded accounts. Annual incentive and long-term incentive awards may be deferred in FE stock accounts, where they are tracked as units. Base salary and annual incentive awards may be deferred into a retirement cash account which earns interest. Dividend equivalents are calculated quarterly on stock units outstanding and are credited in the form of additional stock units. Awards deferred into a retirement stock account will pay out in cash upon separation, including retirement, death or disability. Interest accrues on the cash allocated to the retirement cash account and the balance will pay out in cash as a lump sum or over a defined period of time period as elected by the participant. The liability recognized for EDCP of approximately $175 million and $193 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, is included in “Retirement benefits,” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
DCPD
Under the DCPD, members of the FE Board can elect to defer all or a portion of their equity retainers to a deferred stock account and their cash retainers to deferred stock or deferred cash accounts. The net liability recognized for DCPD of approximately $4 million and $8 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, is included in “Retirement benefits,” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
7. TAXES
FirstEnergy records income taxes in accordance with the liability method of accounting. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts recognized for tax purposes. Investment tax credits, which were deferred when utilized, are being amortized over the recovery period of the related property. Deferred income tax liabilities related to temporary tax and accounting basis differences and tax credit carryforward items are recognized at the statutory income tax rates in effect when the liabilities are expected to be paid. Deferred tax assets are recognized based on income tax rates expected to be in effect when they are settled.
FE and its subsidiaries are party to an intercompany income tax allocation agreement that provides for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities.
On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed into law the IRA of 2022, which, among other things, imposes a new 15% corporate AMT based on AFSI applicable to corporations with a three-year average AFSI over $1 billion. The AMT is effective for the 2023 tax year and, if applicable, corporations must pay the greater of the regular corporate income tax or the AMT. Although NOL carryforwards created through the regular corporate income tax system cannot be used to reduce the AMT, financial statement net operating losses can be used to reduce AFSI and the amount of AMT owed. The IRA of 2022 as enacted requires the U.S. Treasury to provide regulations and other guidance necessary to administer the AMT, including further defining allowable adjustments to determine AFSI, which directly impacts the amount of AMT to be paid. Based on interim guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury during 2022 and 2023, FirstEnergy continues to believe that it is more likely than not it will be subject to the AMT beginning in 2023. Accordingly, FirstEnergy made a first quarter estimated payment of AMT of approximately $49 million in April 2023. In June 2023, the U.S. Treasury issued additional guidance that eliminated the requirement of corporations to include AMT in quarterly estimated tax payments, pending further guidance on the application and administration of AMT. Therefore, as a result of guidance issued to date, the current forecast of AMT obligation, and the amount of AMT already paid in April 2023, FirstEnergy did not make any additional AMT payments for the 2023 tax year. Until final U.S. Treasury regulations are issued, the amount of AMT FirstEnergy pays could be significantly different than current estimates or it may not be a payer at all. The regulatory treatment of the impacts of this legislation may also be subject to regulation by FERC and/or applicable state regulatory authorities. Any adverse development in this legislation, including guidance from the U.S. Treasury and/or the IRS or unfavorable regulatory treatment, could negatively impact FirstEnergy’s cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
As discussed above, FirstEnergy expects to close on the sale of an additional 30% interest in FET in 2024, at which time FirstEnergy expects to realize an approximate $7.5 billion tax gain from the combined sale of 49.9% of the membership interests of FET for consideration received and recapture of negative tax basis in FET. As of December 31, 2023, FirstEnergy had approximately $8.1 billion of gross federal NOL carryforwards, as further discussed below, which will be used to offset a majority of the tax gain from the FET sale and expected taxable income in 2024, however due to certain limitations on utilization enacted in the Tax Act, a portion of the NOL will carry into 2025 and possibly beyond. As a result of the expected additional 30% sale in FET, FirstEnergy recognized a charge to income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2022 of approximately $752 million, representing the deferred tax liability associated with the deferred tax gain on the initial 19.9% sale of FET that closed in May 2022, such deferred gain consisting of consideration received on the sale and the recapture of estimated negative tax basis in FET impacted by taxable income and loss among other factors. In the fourth quarter of 2023, FirstEnergy recognized a charge to income tax expense of approximately $58 million as a true-up of the deferred tax liability associated with the deferred tax gain.
During the third quarter of 2023, FirstEnergy recognized a tax benefit of approximately $65 million, net of a reserve for uncertain tax positions, from the reduction of state income taxes and partial release of a valuation allowance for the expected utilization of state NOL based on an assessment of regulated business operations and a change in the composition of a state tax return filing group.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, FirstEnergy recognized a tax benefit of approximately $37 million from the remeasurement of valuation allowance previously recorded on business interest expense carryforwards, net of carryforward adjustments, based on the expectation that FirstEnergy will be able to utilize these tax benefits on realized and future earnings and distributions from FirstEnergy’s interests in FET and FEV. The business interest expense could not be deducted previously due to certain limitations imposed on interest expense from non-utility operations under section 163(j) of the Tax Act, however, the Tax Act provides that the nondeductible interest can be carried forward indefinitely and deducted against income from non-utility operations. During 2022, FirstEnergy recognized an approximate $38 million tax benefit from remeasurement of the prior valuation allowance on interest expense carryforwards.
On March 29, 2023, the West Virginia Governor signed into law House Bill 3286, which provides corporate taxpayers a reduction to pre-apportionment federal taxable income with the amount necessary to offset the increase in the net deferred tax liability (or decrease in the net deferred tax asset) caused by West Virginia’s apportionment law change enacted in 2021. Beginning with the 2033 tax year, qualifying taxpayers can subtract one-tenth of the amount each year for ten years. Taxpayers intending to claim this subtraction will have to file a statement with the West Virginia tax commissioner by July 1, 2024, specifying the total amount of subtraction to be claimed. Accordingly, FirstEnergy recorded a state deferred tax asset of approximately $9 million in the first quarter of 2023, which was fully reserved. In conjunction with the assessment of regulated business operations discussed above, FirstEnergy removed the $9 million reserve and reduced the state deferred tax asset to approximately $4 million, and recorded a corresponding $4 million regulatory liability associated with the amount expected to be refunded to customers in future rates.
The following table provides the composite of income taxes on income from continuing operations for the years ended 2023, 2022 and 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME TAXES ON INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (In millions) |
Currently payable - | | | | | | |
Federal(1) | | $ | 14 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2 | |
State | | 1 | | | 11 | | | 21 | |
| | 15 | | | 11 | | | 23 | |
Deferred, net - | | | | | | |
Federal(2) | | 279 | | | 946 | | | 174 | |
State | | (24) | | | 47 | | | 127 | |
| | 255 | | | 993 | | | 301 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Investment tax credit amortization | | (3) | | | (4) | | | (4) | |
Total income taxes on income from continuing operations | | $ | 267 | | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 320 | |
(1) Excludes $2 million of federal tax benefit associated with discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(2) Excludes $21 million of federal tax expense and $46 million of federal tax benefits associated with discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2021, respectively.
FirstEnergy tax rates are affected by permanent items, such as AFUDC equity and other flow-through items, as well as discrete items that may occur in any given period but are not consistent from period to period. The following table provides a reconciliation of federal income tax expense at the federal statutory rate to the total income taxes on income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| (In millions) |
| | | | | |
Income from continuing operations, before income taxes | $ | 1,464 | | | $ | 1,439 | | | $ | 1,559 | |
Federal income tax expense at the 21% statutory rate | $ | 307 | | | $ | 302 | | | $ | 327 | |
Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from- | | | | | |
State and municipal income taxes, net of federal tax benefit | 80 | | | 56 | | | 122 | |
AFUDC equity and other flow-through | (30) | | | (26) | | | (29) | |
Amortization of investment tax credits | (3) | | | (4) | | | (4) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Deferred gain on 19.9% FET minority interest sale | 58 | | | 752 | | | — | |
Federal tax credits claimed | (3) | | | (3) | | | (34) | |
Nondeductible DPA monetary penalty | — | | | — | | | 52 | |
Excess deferred tax amortization due to the Tax Act | (46) | | | (51) | | | (54) | |
| | | | | |
Uncertain tax positions | 41 | | | 2 | | | (82) | |
| | | | | |
Valuation allowances | (146) | | | (47) | | | 17 | |
Other, net | 9 | | | 19 | | | 5 | |
Total income taxes on income from continuing operations | $ | 267 | | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 320 | |
Effective income tax rate (continuing operations) | 18.2 | % | | 69.5 | % | | 20.5 | % |
Accumulated deferred income taxes as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | (In millions) |
| | | | |
Property basis differences | | $ | 5,787 | | | $ | 5,528 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Pension and OPEB | | (331) | | | (496) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Regulatory asset/liability | | 647 | | | 432 | |
| | | | |
Deferred compensation | | (153) | | | (149) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Deferred gain on 19.9% FET minority interest sale | | 810 | | | 752 | |
Loss carryforwards and tax credits | | (2,192) | | | (2,073) | |
Valuation reserve | | 226 | | | 440 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Other | | (264) | | | (232) | |
Net accumulated deferred income tax liability | | $ | 4,530 | | | $ | 4,202 | |
FirstEnergy has recorded as deferred income tax assets the effect of federal NOLs and tax credits that will more likely than not be realized through future operations and through the reversal of existing temporary differences. As of December 31, 2023, FirstEnergy's loss carryforwards primarily consisted of $8.1 billion ($1.7 billion, net of tax) of federal NOL carryforwards, $5.9 billion ($1.2 billion, net of tax) of which have no expiration and the remainder that will begin to expire in 2031. As discussed above, FirstEnergy expects to utilize the majority of its federal NOL carryforwards by the end of 2024. However, due to certain limitations on utilization enacted in the Tax Act, a portion of the NOL will carry into 2025 and possibly beyond. In addition, FirstEnergy's tax credit carryforwards primarily consisted of AMT credits of $57 million, which have no expiration, and federal general business tax credits of $12 million that begin to expire in 2039.
The table below summarizes pre-tax NOL carryforwards and their respective anticipated expirations for state and local income tax purposes of approximately $13.5 billion ($436 million, net of tax) for FirstEnergy, of which approximately $6.1 billion ($233 million, net of tax) is expected to be utilized based on current estimates and assumptions. The ultimate utilization of these NOLs may be impacted by statutory limitations on the use of NOLs imposed by state and local tax jurisdictions, changes in statutory tax rates, and changes in business which, among other things, impact both future profitability and the manner in which future taxable income is apportioned to various state and local tax jurisdictions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expiration Period | | State | | Local |
| | (In millions) |
2024-2028 | | $ | 2,403 | | | $ | 5,269 | |
2029-2033 | | 1,415 | | | — | |
2034-2038 | | 1,079 | | | — | |
2039-2043 | | 823 | | | — | |
Indefinite | | 2,469 | | | — | |
| | $ | 8,189 | | | $ | 5,269 | |
The following table summarizes the changes in valuation allowances on federal, state, and local deferred tax assets related to business interest expense carryforwards and employee compensation deduction limitations under section 162(m), in addition to state and local NOLs discussed above for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | |
Beginning of year balance | | $ | 440 | | | $ | 484 | | | $ | 496 | |
Charged to income | | (214) | | | (44) | | | (12) | |
Charged to other accounts | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Write-offs | | — | | | — | | | — | |
End of year balance | | $ | 226 | | | $ | 440 | | | $ | 484 | |
FirstEnergy accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in its financial statements. A recognition threshold and measurement attribute are utilized for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on the tax return. If ultimately recognized in future years, all of the unrecognized income tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate.
The following table summarizes the changes (gross) in uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | (In millions) |
Balance, January 1, 2021 | | $ | 139 | |
Current year increases | | 15 | |
Prior year decreases | | (8) | |
| | |
| | |
Effectively settled with taxing authorities | | (97) | |
Decrease for lapse in statute | | (2) | |
Balance, December 31, 2021 | | $ | 47 | |
| | |
Prior year increases | | 2 | |
| | |
Decrease for lapse in statute | | (7) | |
| | |
| | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | | $ | 42 | |
| | |
Prior years increases | | 88 | |
| | |
Effectively settled with taxing authorities | | (24) | |
Decrease for lapse in statute | | (1) | |
Balance, December 31, 2023 | | $ | 105 | |
As of December 31, 2023, none of the unrecognized tax benefits are expected to be resolved during 2024 as a result of settlements with taxing authorities or the statute of limitations expiring.
FirstEnergy recognizes interest expense or income and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income taxes by applying the applicable statutory interest rate to the difference between the tax position recognized and the amount previously taken, or expected to be taken, on the tax return. FirstEnergy includes interest expense or income and penalties in the provision for income taxes. Due to uncertain tax positions that were effectively settled with tax authorities during 2023, approximately $9 million in net interest was reversed. There was no material interest expense or income, or penalties, related to uncertain tax positions in 2022 and 2021.
General Taxes
General tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, recognized in continuing operations is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (In millions) |
kWh excise | | $ | 185 | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 189 | |
State gross receipts | | 235 | | | 219 | | | 190 | |
Real and personal property | | 615 | | | 596 | | | 571 | |
Social security and unemployment | | 113 | | | 105 | | | 103 | |
Other | | 16 | | | 18 | | | 20 | |
Total general taxes | | $ | 1,164 | | | $ | 1,129 | | | $ | 1,073 | |
8. LEASES
FirstEnergy primarily leases vehicles as well as building space, office equipment, and other property and equipment under cancellable and non-cancelable leases. FirstEnergy does not have any material leases in which it is the lessor.
FirstEnergy accounts for leases under, "Leases (Topic 842)". Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term and not recorded on the balance sheet. Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from 1 to 40 years, and certain leases include options to terminate. In December 2023, FirstEnergy purchased the General Office building in Akron, Ohio with the intention to sell in the future. It is currently expected that the exit of the General Office and sale will occur in 2025. The exercise of lease renewal options is at FirstEnergy’s sole discretion. Renewal options are included within the lease liability if they are reasonably certain based on various factors relative to the contract. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property. The depreciable life of leased assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. FirstEnergy’s lease agreements do not contain any material restrictive covenants. FirstEnergy has elected a policy to not separate lease components from non-lease components for all asset classes.
For vehicles leased under certain master lease agreements, the lessor is guaranteed a residual value up to a stated percentage of the equipment cost at the end of the lease term. If the actual fair value of the leased equipment is below the guaranteed residual value at the end of the lease term, FirstEnergy is committed to pay the difference in the actual fair value and the residual value guarantee. FirstEnergy does not believe it is probable that it will be required to pay anything pertaining to the residual value guarantee, and the lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are measured accordingly.
Finance leases for assets used in regulated operations are recognized in FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income such that amortization of the right-of-use asset and interest on lease liabilities equals the expense recorded for ratemaking purposes. Finance leases for regulated and non-regulated operations are accounted for as if the assets were owned and financed, with associated expense recognized in Interest expense and Provision for depreciation on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income, while all operating lease expenses are recognized in Other operating expense. The components of lease expense were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
(In millions) | | Vehicles | | Buildings | | Other | | Total |
Operating lease costs(1) | | $ | 60 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 79 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Finance lease costs: | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of right-of-use assets | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 2 | | | 8 | |
Interest on lease liabilities | | — | | | 5 | | | — | | | 5 | |
Total finance lease cost | | 4 | | | 7 | | | 2 | | | 13 | |
Total lease cost | | $ | 64 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 92 | |
(1) Includes $27 million of short-term lease costs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
(In millions) | | Vehicles | | Buildings | | Other | | Total |
Operating lease costs(1) | | $ | 50 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 73 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Finance lease costs: | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of right-of-use assets | | 10 | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 13 | |
Interest on lease liabilities | | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | 3 | |
Total finance lease cost | | 10 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 16 | |
Total lease cost | | $ | 60 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 89 | |
(1) Includes $19 million of short-term lease costs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
(In millions) | | Vehicles | | Buildings | | Other | | Total |
Operating lease costs(1) | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 71 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Finance lease costs: | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of right-of-use assets | | 12 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 14 | |
Interest on lease liabilities | | 1 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 4 | |
Total finance lease cost | | 13 | | | 4 | | | 1 | | | 18 | |
Total lease cost | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 89 | |
(1) Includes $21 million of short-term lease costs.
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | | | | | | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 64 | |
Operating cash flows from finance leases | | 3 | | | 3 | | 4 |
Finance cash flows from finance leases | | 8 | | | 12 | | 13 |
| | | | | | |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | | | | | | |
Operating leases | | $ | 13 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 60 | |
Finance leases | | — | | | — | | | 5 | |
Lease terms and discount rates were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Weighted-average remaining lease terms (years) | | | | | | |
Operating leases | | 5.93 | | 7.30 | | 7.97 |
Finance leases | | 12.26 | | 11.33 | | 8.12 |
| | | | | | |
Weighted-average discount rate(1) | | | | | | |
Operating leases | | 4.51 | % | | 4.22 | % | | 4.16 | % |
Finance leases | | 14.73 | % | | 14.77 | % | | 12.22 | % |
(1) When an implicit rate is not readily determinable, an incremental borrowing rate is utilized, determining the present value of lease payments. The rate is determined based on expected term and information available at the commencement date.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | As of December 31, |
(In millions) | | Financial Statement Line Item | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Operating lease(1) | | Deferred charges and other assets | | $ | 205 | | | $ | 262 | |
Finance lease(2) | | Property, plant and equipment | | 35 | | | 45 | |
Total leased assets | | | | $ | 240 | | | $ | 307 | |
| | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Current: | | | | | | |
Operating | | Other current liabilities | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 48 | |
Finance | | Currently payable long-term debt | | 3 | | | 6 | |
| | | | | | |
Noncurrent: | | | | | | |
Operating | | Other noncurrent liabilities | | 179 | | | 247 | |
Finance | | Long-term debt and other long-term obligations | | 11 | | | 17 | |
Total leased liabilities | | | | $ | 240 | | | $ | 318 | |
(1) Operating lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $139 million and $114 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(2) Finance lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $33 million and $60 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2023, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases | | Total |
2024 | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 58 | |
2025 | | 47 | | | 4 | | | 51 | |
2026 | | 43 | | | 4 | | | 47 | |
2027 | | 37 | | | 3 | | | 40 | |
2028 | | 33 | | | 4 | | | 37 | |
Thereafter | | 47 | | | — | | | 47 | |
Total lease payments(1) | | 261 | | | 19 | | | 280 | |
Less imputed interest | | 35 | | | 5 | | | 40 | |
Total net present value | | $ | 226 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 240 | |
(1) Operating lease payments for certain leases are offset by sublease receipts of $8 million over 9 years.
As of December 31, 2023, additional operating leases agreements, primarily for vehicles, that have not yet commenced are $42 million. These leases are expected to commence within the next 18 months with lease terms of 5 to 10 years.
9. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
FirstEnergy performs qualitative analyses based on control and economics to determine whether a variable interest classifies FirstEnergy as the primary beneficiary (a controlling financial interest) of a VIE. An enterprise has a controlling financial interest if it has both power and economic control, such that an entity has: (i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. FirstEnergy consolidates a VIE when it is determined that it is the primary beneficiary.
In order to evaluate contracts for consolidation treatment and entities for which FirstEnergy has an interest, FirstEnergy aggregates variable interests into categories based on similar risk characteristics and significance.
Consolidated VIEs
Total assets on the FirstEnergy consolidated balance sheets include approximately $11,024 million and $10,104 million of consolidated VIE assets, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, that can only be used to settle the liabilities of the applicable VIE. Total liabilities include approximately $7,835 million and $7,573 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, of consolidated VIE liabilities for which the VIE's creditors do not have recourse to FirstEnergy.
VIEs in which FirstEnergy is the primary beneficiary consist of the following (included in FirstEnergy’s consolidated financial statements):
Securitization Companies
•Ohio Securitization Companies - In June 2013, the SPEs formed by the Ohio Companies issued approximately $445 million of pass-through trust certificates supported by phase-in recovery bonds to securitize the recovery of certain all-electric customer heating discounts, fuel and purchased power regulatory assets. The phase-in recovery bonds are payable only from, and secured by, phase in recovery property owned by the SPEs. The bondholder has no recourse to the general credit of FirstEnergy or any of the Ohio Companies. Each of the Ohio Companies, as servicer of its respective SPE, manages and administers the phase in recovery property including the billing, collection and remittance of usage-based charges payable by retail electric customers. The SPEs are considered VIEs and each one is consolidated into its applicable utility. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, $191 million and $206 million of the phase-in recovery bonds were outstanding, respectively.
•MP and PE Environmental Funding Companies - The consolidated financial statements of FirstEnergy include environmental control bonds issued by two bankruptcy remote, special purpose limited liability companies that are indirect subsidiaries of MP and PE. Proceeds from the bonds were used to construct environmental control facilities. Principal and interest owed on the environmental control bonds is secured by, and payable solely from, the proceeds of the environmental control charges. Creditors of FirstEnergy, other than the limited liability company SPEs, have no recourse to any assets or revenues of the special purpose limited liability companies. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, $218 million and $247 million of environmental control bonds were outstanding, respectively.
Restricted cash included on the FE Consolidated Balance Sheets of $40 million and $41 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 respectively, relates to cash collected from MP, PE and the Ohio Companies' customers that is specifically used to service debt of their respective funding companies.
FET
FET is a holding company that owns equity interests in ATSI, MAIT, TrAIL and PATH. As of December 31, 2023, FE has ownership in FET of 80.1% with Brookfield having 19.9%. As further discussed above, on February 2, 2023, FE entered into an agreement with Brookfield to sell an incremental 30% equity interest in FET, which will bring FE’s equity ownership in FET to 50.1% and Brookfield to 49.9%. The FET Minority Equity Interest Sale is expected to close by the end of first quarter of 2024. FirstEnergy has concluded that FET is a VIE and that FE is the primarily beneficiary because FE has exposure to the economics of FET and the power to direct significant activities of FET through the FESC services agreement, which represents a separate variable interest.
Although Brookfield will be granted incremental consent rights upon closing of the incremental 30% sale, Brookfield will not have unilateral control over any activities that most significantly impact FET’s economic performance. However, FE will continue to retain power over the activities that most significantly impact FET’s economic performance through its incremental decision making rights under the existing FESC services agreement, through which executive management and workforce services are provided to FET. As a result, FE is the primary beneficiary of FET and FET will continue to be consolidated in FirstEnergy’s financial statements.
The following shows the carrying amounts and classification of the FET assets and liabilities included in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. Amounts exclude intercompany balances which were eliminated in consolidation. The assets of FET can only be used to settle its obligations, and creditors of FET do not have recourse to the general credit of FirstEnergy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 77 | |
Receivables | | | 88 | | 79 | |
Materials and supplies, at average cost | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Prepaid taxes and other | | | 23 | | | 23 | |
Total current assets | | | 188 | | | 180 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 10,227 | | | 9,365 | |
Goodwill | | | 224 | | | 224 | |
Investments | | | 19 | | | 20 | |
Regulatory assets | | | 16 | | | 1 | |
Other | | | 310 | | | 273 | |
Total noncurrent assets | | | 10,796 | | | 9,883 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | $ | 10,984 | | | $ | 10,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 2 | | | — | |
Accrued interest | | | 63 | | | 58 | |
Accrued taxes | | | 262 | | | 278 | |
Other | | | 14 | | | 7 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 341 | | | 343 | |
Long-term debt and other long-term obligations | | | 5,275 | | | 4,949 | |
Accumulated deferred income taxes | | | 1,218 | | | 1,129 | |
Regulatory liabilities | | | 307 | | | 443 | |
Other | | | 285 | | | 256 | |
Total noncurrent liabilities | | | 7,085 | | | 6,777 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | $ | 7,426 | | | $ | 7,120 | |
Unconsolidated VIEs
FirstEnergy is not the primary beneficiary of its equity method investments in Global Holding and PATH WV, as further discussed above, or its PPAs.
FirstEnergy evaluated its PPAs and determined that certain NUG entities at its Regulated Distribution segment may be VIEs to the extent that they own a plant that sells substantially all of its output to the applicable utilities and the contract price for power is correlated with the plant’s variable costs of production. As of December 31, 2023, FirstEnergy maintains four long-term PPAs with NUG entities that were entered into pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. FirstEnergy was not involved in the creation of, and has no equity or debt invested in, any of these entities. FirstEnergy has determined that, it does not have a variable interest, or the entities do not meet the criteria to be considered a VIE.
During 2023, FirstEnergy terminated the PPA with the NUG entity in which it had previously applied the scope exception that exempts enterprises unable to obtain the necessary information to evaluate entities.
Because FirstEnergy has no equity or debt interests in the NUG entities, its maximum exposure to loss relates primarily to the above-market costs incurred for power. FirstEnergy expects any above-market costs incurred at its Regulated Distribution segment to be recovered from customers.
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Authoritative accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 measurements and the lowest priority to Level 3 measurements. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy and a description of the valuation techniques are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Level 1 | - | Quoted prices for identical instruments in active market |
| | |
Level 2 | - | Quoted prices for similar instruments in active market |
| - | Quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active |
| - | Model-derived valuations for which all significant inputs are observable market data |
Models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures.
| | | | | | | | |
Level 3 | - | Valuation inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement |
FirstEnergy produces a long-term power and capacity price forecast annually with periodic updates as market conditions change. When underlying prices are not observable, prices from the long-term price forecast are used to measure fair value.
FTRs are financial instruments that entitle the holder to a stream of revenues (or charges) based on the hourly day-ahead congestion price differences across transmission paths. FTRs are acquired by FirstEnergy in the annual, monthly and long-term PJM auctions and are initially recorded using the auction clearing price less cost. After initial recognition, FTRs' carrying values are periodically adjusted to fair value using a mark-to-model methodology, which approximates market. The primary inputs into the model, which are generally less observable than objective sources, are the most recent PJM auction clearing prices and the FTRs' remaining hours. The model calculates the fair value by multiplying the most recent auction clearing price by the remaining FTR hours less the prorated FTR cost. Significant increases or decreases in inputs in isolation may have resulted in a higher or lower fair value measurement.
FirstEnergy primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements using the best information available. Accordingly, FirstEnergy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. There were no changes in valuation methodologies used as of December 31, 2023, from those used as of December 31, 2022. The determination of the fair value measures takes into consideration various factors, including but not limited to, nonperformance risk, counterparty credit risk and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits, LOCs and priority interests). The impact of these forms of risk was not significant to the fair value measurements.
For investments reported at NAV where there is no readily determinable fair value, a practical expedient is available that allows the NAV to approximate fair value. Investments that use NAV as a practical expedient are excluded from the requirement to be categorized within the fair value hierarchy tables. Instead, these investments are reported outside of the fair value hierarchy tables to assist in the reconciliation of investment balances reported in the tables to the balance sheet. FirstEnergy has elected the NAV practical expedient for investments in private equity funds, insurance-linked securities, hedge funds (absolute return) and real estate funds held within the pension plan. See Note 5, "Pension And Other Postemployment Benefits" for the pension financial assets accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy.
The following tables set forth the recurring assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Assets | (In millions) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets FTRs(1) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | |
U.S. state debt securities | — | | | 275 | | | — | | | 275 | | | — | | | 266 | | | — | | | 266 | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(2) | 179 | | | — | | | — | | | 179 | | | 206 | | | — | | | — | | | 206 | |
Other(3) | — | | | 40 | | | — | | | 40 | | | — | | | 40 | | | — | | | 40 | |
Total assets | $ | 181 | | | $ | 315 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 208 | | | $ | 306 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities FTRs(1) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | (2) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | (2) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets (liabilities) | $ | 181 | | | $ | 315 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 499 | | | $ | 208 | | | $ | 306 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 523 | |
(1) Contracts are subject to regulatory accounting treatment and changes in market values do not impact earnings.
(2) Restricted cash of $42 million and $46 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, primarily relates to cash collected from MP, PE and the Ohio Companies' customers that is specifically used to service debt of their respective funding companies. See Note 11, Capitalization for additional information.
(3) Primarily consists of short-term investments.
INVESTMENTS
All temporary cash investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less are reported as cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost, which approximates their fair market value. Investments other than cash and cash equivalents include AFS debt securities and other investments. FirstEnergy has no debt securities held for trading purposes.
Generally, unrealized gains and losses on equity securities are recognized in income whereas unrealized gains and losses on AFS debt securities are recognized in AOCI. However, the JCP&L spent nuclear fuel disposal trusts are subject to regulatory accounting with all gains and losses on equity and AFS debt securities offset against regulatory assets.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Trusts
JCP&L holds debt securities within the spent nuclear fuel disposal trust, which are classified as AFS securities, recognized at fair market value. The trust is intended for funding spent nuclear fuel disposal fees to the United States Department of Energy associated with the previously owned Oyster Creek and Three Mile Island Unit 1 nuclear power plants.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost basis, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and fair values of investments held in nuclear fuel disposal trusts as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2023(1) | | December 31, 2022(2) |
| | Cost Basis | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Cost Basis | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| | (In millions) |
Debt securities | | $ | 301 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (27) | | | $ | 275 | | | $ | 294 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (28) | | | $ | 266 | |
(1) Excludes short-term cash investments of $6 million.
(2) Excludes short-term cash investments of $5 million.
Proceeds from the sale of investments in AFS debt securities, realized gains and losses on those sales and interest and dividend income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (In millions) |
Sale Proceeds | | $ | 38 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 48 | |
Realized Gains | | — | | | 8 | | | — | |
Realized Losses | | (3) | | | (13) | | | (3) | |
| | | | | | |
Interest and Dividend Income | | 12 | | | 11 | | | 11 | |
Other Investments
Other investments include employee benefit trusts, which are primarily invested in corporate-owned life insurance policies and equity method investments. Earnings and losses associated with corporate-owned life insurance policies and equity method investments are reflected in the “Miscellaneous Income, net” line of FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Other investments were $382 million and $351 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and are excluded from the amounts reported above. See Note 1, "Organization and Basis of Presentation," for additional information on FirstEnergy's equity method investments.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, pre-tax income (expense) related to corporate-owned life insurance policies were $18 million, $(20) million and $13 million, respectively. Corporate-owned life insurance policies are valued using the cash surrender value and any changes in value during the period are recognized as income or expense.
LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
All borrowings with initial maturities of less than one year are defined as short-term financial instruments under GAAP and are reported as Short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. Since these borrowings are short-term in nature, FirstEnergy believes that their costs approximate their fair market value. The following table provides the approximate fair value and related carrying amounts of long-term debt, which excludes finance lease obligations and net unamortized debt issuance costs, unamortized fair value adjustments, premiums and discounts as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, | |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| (In millions) |
Carrying Value | $ | 24,254 | | | | $ | 21,641 | | |
Fair Value | 23,003 | | | | 19,784 | | |
The fair values of long-term debt and other long-term obligations reflect the present value of the cash outflows relating to those securities based on the current call price, the yield to maturity or the yield to call, as deemed appropriate at the end of each respective period. The yields assumed were based on securities with similar characteristics offered by corporations with credit ratings similar to those of FirstEnergy. FirstEnergy classified short-term borrowings, long-term debt and other long-term obligations as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
See Note 11, "Capitalization," for further information on long-term debt issued and redeemed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.
11. CAPITALIZATION
COMMON STOCK
Retained Earnings and Dividends
As of December 31, 2023, FirstEnergy had an accumulated deficit of $97 million. Dividends declared in 2023 totaled $1.60 per share and dividends declared in 2022 totaled $1.56 per share. Dividends of $0.39 per share were declared in the first, second, third and fourth quarters in 2022 and the first and second quarters in 2023. In September 2023, the FE Board declared a $0.02 per share increase to the quarterly common dividend payable December 1, 2023, to $0.41 per share, which represents a 5% increase compared to the quarterly payments of $0.39 per share paid by FE since March 2020. The dividend declared in the fourth quarter of 2023, payable on March 1, 2024, was also $0.41 per share.
The amount and timing of all dividend declarations are subject to the discretion of the FE Board and its consideration of business conditions, results of operations, financial condition, risks and uncertainties of the government investigations, and other factors.
When FE makes distributions to shareholders, it is required to subsequently determine and report the tax characterization of those distributions for purposes of shareholders’ income taxes. Whether a distribution is characterized as a dividend or a return of capital (and possible capital gain) depends upon an internal tax calculation to determine earnings and profits for income tax purposes. Earnings and profits should not be confused with earnings or net income under GAAP. Further, after FE reports the expected tax characterization of distributions it has paid, the actual characterization could vary from its expectation with the result that holders of FE's common stock could incur different income tax liabilities than expected.
In general, distributions are characterized as dividends to the extent the amount of such distributions do not exceed FE's calculation of current or accumulated earnings and profits. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits may be treated as a non-taxable return of capital. Generally, a non-taxable return of capital will reduce an investor’s basis in FirstEnergy's stock for federal tax purposes, which will impact the calculation of gain or loss when the stock is sold.
Provided the FET Minority Equity Interest Sale closes as anticipated, FE expects to realize an over $7 billion tax gain in 2024. This tax gain is estimated to create sufficient earnings and profits to cause distributions made during 2024 to be characterized as ordinary dividends for federal income tax purposes. Upon such characterization, shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the income tax treatment of FE's distributions to them.
In addition to paying dividends from retained earnings, the Ohio Companies and JCP&L have authorization from FERC to pay cash dividends to FE from paid-in capital accounts, as long as their FERC-defined equity-to-total-capitalization ratio remains above 35%. In addition, AGC has authorization from FERC to pay cash dividends to its parent, MP, from paid-in capital accounts, as long as its FERC-defined equity-to-total-capitalization ratio remains above 45%. The articles of incorporation, indentures, regulatory limitations, FET P&SA I and FET P&SA II, and various other agreements, including those relating to the long-term debt of certain FirstEnergy subsidiaries contain provisions that could further restrict the payment of dividends on their common stock. None of these provisions materially restricted FirstEnergy subsidiaries’ abilities to pay cash dividends to FE as of December 31, 2023.
Common Stock Issuance
FE issued approximately 2 million shares of common stock in 2023, 2 million shares of common stock in 2022 and 1 million shares of common stock in 2021 to registered shareholders and its directors and the employees of its subsidiaries under its Stock Investment Plan and certain share-based benefit plans.
On November 6, 2021, FE entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with BIP Securities II-B L.P., an affiliate of Blackstone Infrastructure Partners L.P., for the private placement of 25,588,535 shares of FE common stock, par value $0.10 per share, at a price of $39.08 per share, representing an investment of $1.0 billion. The transaction settled on December 13, 2021. Issuance costs associated with the transaction were approximately $26 million as of December 31, 2021.
PREFERRED AND PREFERENCE STOCK
FirstEnergy and the Utilities were authorized to issue preferred stock and preference stock as of December 31, 2023, as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred Stock | | Preference Stock |
| | Shares Authorized | | Par Value | | Shares Authorized | | Par Value |
FE | | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | | | |
OE | | 6,000,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | 8,000,000 | | | no par |
OE | | 8,000,000 | | | $ | 25 | | | | | |
Penn(1) | | 1,200,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | | | |
CEI | | 4,000,000 | | | no par | | 3,000,000 | | | no par |
TE | | 3,000,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 25 | |
TE | | 12,000,000 | | | $ | 25 | | | | | |
JCP&L | | 15,600,000 | | | no par | | | | |
ME(1) | | 10,000,000 | | | no par | | | | |
PN(1) | | 11,435,000 | | | no par | | | | |
MP | | 940,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | | | |
PE | | 10,000,000 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | | | |
WP(1) | | 32,000,000 | | | no par | | | | |
(1) On January 1, 2024, FirstEnergy consolidated the Pennsylvania Companies into FE PA, making it a new, single operating entity. FE PA has not been authorized to issue preferred stock or preference stock.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were no preferred stock or preference stock outstanding.
LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
The following tables present outstanding long-term debt and finance lease obligations for FirstEnergy as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2023 | | As of December 31, |
| | Maturity Date | | Interest Rate | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | | | | | (In millions) |
FMBs and secured notes - fixed rate | | 2024-2059 | | 2.650% - 8.250% | | $ | 5,709 | | | $ | 5,153 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Unsecured notes - fixed rate | | 2024-2050 | | 1.600% - 7.375% | | 18,545 | | | 16,488 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Finance lease obligations | | | | | | 14 | | | 23 | |
Unamortized debt discounts | | | | | | (9) | | | (5) | |
Unamortized debt issuance costs | | | | | | (127) | | | (110) | |
Unamortized fair value adjustments | | | | | | 3 | | | 5 | |
Currently payable long-term debt | | | | | | (1,250) | | | (351) | |
Total long-term debt and other long-term obligations | | | | | | $ | 22,885 | | | $ | 21,203 | |
See Note 8, "Leases," for additional information related to finance leases.
FirstEnergy had the following redemptions and issuances during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Company | Type | Redemption/Issuance Date | Interest Rate | Maturity | Amount (In millions) | Description |
Redemptions(1) |
ME | Unsecured Notes | March, 2023 | 3.50% | 2023 | $300 | ME redeemed unsecured notes that became due. |
FE | Unsecured Notes | May, 2023 | 7.38% | 2031 | $194 | FE repurchased approximately $194 million of the principal amount of its 2031 Notes through the open market for $228 million including a premium of approximately $34 million ($27 million after-tax). In addition, FE recognized approximately $2 million ($1 million after-tax) of deferred cash flow hedge losses associated with the FE debt redemptions. |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Issuances |
WP | FMBs | January, 2023 | 5.29% | 2033 | $50 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
MAIT | Unsecured Notes | February, 2023 | 5.39% | 2033 | $175 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
ME | Unsecured Notes | March, 2023 | 5.20% | 2028 | $425 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, including borrowings incurred to repay, at maturity, the $300 million aggregate principal amount of ME's 3.50% unsecured notes due March 15, 2023, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
PN | Unsecured Notes | March, 2023 | 5.15% | 2026 | $300 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
ATSI | Unsecured Notes | May, 2023 | 5.13% | 2033 | $150 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
FE | Unsecured Convertible Notes | May, 2023 | 4.00% | 2026 | $1,500 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to repurchase a portion of its 2031 Notes, to fund the qualified pension plan and for other general corporate purposes. |
PE | FMBs | September, 2023 | 5.64% | 2028 | $100 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
PE | FMBs | September, 2023 | 5.73% | 2030 | $50 | Proceeds were used to repay short-term borrowings, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
MP | FMBs | September, 2023 | 5.85% | 2034 | $400 | Proceeds are to be used for repaying short-term and long-term debt, including MP’s $400 million 4.10% FMBs due April 15, 2024, to finance capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(1) Excludes principal payments on securitized bonds.
Convertible Notes
As discussed above, on May 4, 2023, FE issued $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of 2026 Convertible Notes, with a fixed interest rate of 4.00% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on November 1, 2023. The 2026 Convertible Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of FE, and will mature on May 1, 2026, unless required to be converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. However, FE may not elect to redeem the 2026 Convertible Notes prior to the maturity date. The 2026 Convertible Notes are included within “Long-term debt and other long-term obligations” on the FirstEnergy Consolidated Balance Sheets. Proceeds from the issuance were approximately $1.48 billion, net of issuance costs.
Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding February 1, 2026, the 2026 Convertible Notes will be convertible at the option of the holders only under the following conditions:
•During any calendar quarter, if the last reported sale price of FE’s common stock for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day;
•During the five consecutive business day period immediately after any 10 consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the 2026 Convertible Notes for each trading day of such 10 trading day period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of FE’s common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; or
•Upon the occurrence of certain corporate events specified in the indenture governing the 2026 Convertible Notes.
On and after February 1, 2026, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders of the 2026 Convertible Notes may convert all or any portion of their 2026 Convertible Notes at their option at any time at the conversion rate then in effect, irrespective of these conditions. FE will settle conversions of the 2026 Convertible Notes, if any, by paying cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the 2026 Convertible Notes being converted and by paying cash or delivering shares of FE’s common stock (or a combination of each), at its election, of its conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the 2026 Convertible Notes being converted.
The conversion rate for the 2026 Convertible Notes will initially be 21.3620 shares of FE’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2026 Convertible Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $46.81 per share of FE’s
common stock). The initial conversion price of the 2026 Convertible Notes represents a premium of approximately 20% over the last reported sale price of FE’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on May 1, 2023. The conversion rate and the corresponding conversion price will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. FE may not elect to redeem the 2026 Convertible Notes prior to the maturity date.
If FE undergoes a fundamental change (as defined in the relevant indenture), subject to certain conditions, holders of the 2026 Convertible Notes may require FE to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their 2026 Convertible Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2026 Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date (as defined in the relevant indenture). In addition, if certain fundamental changes occur, FE may be required, in certain circumstances, to increase the conversion rate for any 2026 Convertible Notes converted in connection with such fundamental changes by a specified number of shares of its common stock.
The following table presents scheduled debt repayments or debt that has been noticed for redemption for outstanding long-term debt, excluding finance leases, fair value purchase accounting adjustments and unamortized debt discounts and premiums, for the next five years as of December 31, 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 |
Scheduled debt repayments | | $1,246 | | $2,023 | | $2,876 | | $2,003 | | $2,453 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Securitized Bonds
Environmental Control Bonds
The consolidated financial statements of FirstEnergy include environmental control bonds issued by two bankruptcy remote, special purpose limited liability companies that are indirect subsidiaries of MP and PE. Proceeds from the bonds were used to construct environmental control facilities. Principal and interest owed on the environmental control bonds is secured by, and payable solely from, the proceeds of the environmental control charges. Creditors of FirstEnergy, other than the limited liability company SPEs, have no recourse to any assets or revenues of the special purpose limited liability companies. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, $218 million and $247 million of environmental control bonds were outstanding, respectively.
Phase-In Recovery Bonds
In June 2013, the SPEs formed by the Ohio Companies issued approximately $445 million of pass-through trust certificates supported by phase-in recovery bonds to securitize the recovery of certain all-electric customer heating discounts, fuel and purchased power regulatory assets. The phase-in recovery bonds are payable only from, and secured by, phase in recovery property owned by the SPEs. The bondholder has no recourse to the general credit of FirstEnergy or any of the Ohio Companies. Each of the Ohio Companies, as servicer of its respective SPE, manages and administers the phase in recovery property including the billing, collection and remittance of usage-based charges payable by retail electric customers. The SPEs are considered VIEs and each one is consolidated into its applicable utility. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, $191 million and $206 million of the phase-in recovery bonds were outstanding, respectively.
FMBs
The Ohio Companies, Penn, MP, PE, and WP each have a first mortgage indenture under which they can issue FMBs secured by a direct first mortgage lien on substantially all of their property and franchises, other than specifically excepted property. The outstanding debt under the FMBs of specific FE PA predecessors (WP and Penn) were assumed by FE PA.
Debt Covenant Default Provisions
FirstEnergy has various debt covenants under certain financing arrangements, including its revolving credit facilities and term loans. The most restrictive of the debt covenants relate to the nonpayment of interest and/or principal on such debt and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The failure by FirstEnergy to comply with the covenants contained in its financing arrangements could result in an event of default, which may have an adverse effect on its financial condition. As of December 31, 2023, FirstEnergy remains in compliance with all debt covenant provisions.
Additionally, there are cross-default provisions in a number of the financing arrangements. These provisions generally trigger a default in the applicable financing arrangement of an entity if it, or any of its significant subsidiaries, default under another financing arrangement in excess of a certain principal amount, typically $100 million. Such defaults by any of the Utilities or Transmission Companies would cross-default certain FE financing arrangements containing these provisions, and a certain FET Financing arrangement, with respect to the Transmission Companies only. Such defaults by AE Supply would not cross-default to applicable financing arrangements of FE. Also, defaults by FE would generally not cross-default applicable financing arrangements of any of FE’s subsidiaries. Cross-default provisions are not typically found in any of the senior notes or FMBs of FE or its subsidiaries.
12. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS AND BANK LINES OF CREDIT
FirstEnergy had $775 million and $100 million of outstanding short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
On October 18, 2021, FE, FET, the Utilities, and the Transmission Companies entered into the 2021 Credit Facilities, which were six separate senior unsecured five-year syndicated revolving credit facilities with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and PNC Bank, National Association that replaced the FE Revolving Facility and the FET Revolving Facility, and provide for aggregate commitments of $4.5 billion. Under the 2021 Credit Facilities, an aggregate amount of $4.5 billion is available to be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed, subject to each borrower’s respective sublimit under the respective facilities. These credit facilities provide substantial liquidity to support the Regulated businesses, and each of the operating companies within the businesses.
On October 20, 2023, FE and certain of its subsidiaries entered into the amendments to each of the 2021 Credit Facilities to, among other things; (i) amend the FE Revolving Facility to release FET as a borrower and (ii) extend the maturity date of the 2021 Credit Facilities for an additional one-year period, from October 18, 2026 to October 18, 2027. Also, on October 20, 2023, each of FET and KATCo entered into the 2023 Credit Facilities. In connection with PA Consolidation, the Pennsylvania Companies' rights and obligations under their revolving credit facility were assumed by FE PA on January 1, 2024.
Under the FET Revolving Facility, $1.0 billion is available to be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until October 20, 2028. Under the KATCo Revolving Facility, (i) $150 million is available to be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until October 20, 2027, (ii) borrowings will mature on the earlier of 364 days from the date of borrowing or the commitment termination date, as the same may be extended; upon KATCo demonstrating to the administrative agent authorization to borrow amounts maturing more than 364 days from the date of borrowing, its borrowings will mature on the latest commitment termination date. KATCo may not draw on the KATCo Credit Facility until the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the availability of first quarter financial statements, which are expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2024.
The 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities are as follows:
•FE, $1.0 billion revolving credit facility;
•FET, $1.0 billion revolving credit facility;
•Ohio Companies, $800 million revolving credit facility;
•FE PA, $950 million revolving credit facility;
•JCP&L, $500 million revolving credit facility;
•MP and PE, $400 million revolving credit facility;
•Transmission Companies, $850 million revolving credit facility; and
•KATCo, $150 million revolving credit facility.
As of December 31, 2023, available liquidity under the 2021 and 2023 Credit Facilities was approximately $5.0 billion.
Borrowings under the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities may be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Generally, borrowings under each of the credit facilities are available to each borrower separately and mature on the earlier of 364 days from the date of borrowing or the commitment termination date, as the same may be extended. Each of the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities contain financial covenants requiring each borrower, with the exception of FE, to maintain a consolidated debt-to-total-capitalization ratio (as defined under each of the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities) of no more than 65%, and 75% for FET, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter. FE is required under its 2021 Credit Facility to maintain a consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.50 times, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter for the last four fiscal quarters beginning with the quarter ending December 31, 2021.
Subject to each borrower’s sublimit, certain amounts are available for the issuance of LOCs (subject to borrowings drawn under the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities) expiring up to one year from the date of issuance. The stated amount of outstanding LOCs will count against total commitments available under each of the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities and against the applicable borrower’s borrowing sublimit. As of December 31, 2023, FirstEnergy had $4 million in outstanding LOCs.
The 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities do not contain provisions that restrict the ability to borrow or accelerate payment of outstanding advances in the event of any change in credit ratings of the borrowers. Pricing is defined in “pricing grids,” whereby the cost of funds borrowed under the 2021 Credit Facilities and the 2023 Credit Facilities are related to the credit ratings of the company borrowing the funds. Additionally, borrowings under each of the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities are subject to the usual and customary provisions for acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default, including a cross-default for other indebtedness in excess of $100 million.
As of December 31, 2023, the borrowers were in compliance with the applicable interest coverage and debt-to-total-capitalization ratio covenants in each case as defined under the 2021 Credit Facilities and 2023 Credit Facilities.
FirstEnergy Money Pools
FirstEnergy’s utility operating subsidiary companies also have the ability to borrow from each other and FE to meet their short-term working capital requirements. Similar but separate arrangements exist among FirstEnergy’s unregulated companies with AE Supply, FE, FET, FEV and certain other unregulated subsidiaries. FESC administers these money pools and tracks surplus funds of FE and the respective regulated and unregulated subsidiaries, as the case may be, as well as proceeds available from bank borrowings. Companies receiving a loan under the money pool agreements must repay the principal amount of the loan, together with accrued interest, within 364 days of borrowing the funds. The rate of interest is the same for each company receiving a loan from their respective pool and is based on the average cost of funds available through the pool. The high interest rate environment has caused the rate and interest expense on borrowings under the various FirstEnergy credit facilities to be significantly higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Interest Rates | Regulated Companies’ Money Pool | | Unregulated Companies’ Money Pool |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | | | | | | |
For the Years Ended December 31, | 6.30 | % | | 2.27 | % | | 6.01 | % | | 2.14 | % |
Weighted Average Interest Rates
The annual weighted average interest rates on short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, were 6.96% and 3.93%, respectively.
13. REGULATORY MATTERS
STATE REGULATION
Each of the Utilities' retail rates, conditions of service, issuance of securities and other matters are subject to regulation in the states in which it operates - in Maryland by the MDPSC, in New Jersey by the NJBPU, in Ohio by the PUCO, in Pennsylvania by the PPUC, in West Virginia by the WVPSC and in New York by the NYPSC. The transmission operations of PE and TrAIL in Virginia, ATSI in Ohio, the Transmission Companies in Pennsylvania, PE and MP in West Virginia, and PE in Maryland are subject to certain regulations of the VSCC, PUCO, PPUC, WVPSC, and MDPSC, respectively. In addition, under Ohio law, municipalities may regulate rates of a public utility, subject to appeal to the PUCO if not acceptable to the utility. Further, if any of the FirstEnergy affiliates were to engage in the construction of significant new transmission facilities, depending on the state, they may be required to obtain state regulatory authorization to site, construct and operate the new transmission facility.
The following table summarizes the key terms of base distribution rate orders in effect for the Utilities as of December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Company | | Rates Effective For Customers | | Allowed Debt/Equity | | Allowed ROE |
CEI | | May 2009 | | 51% /49% | | 10.5% |
ME(1) | | January 2017 | | 48.8% / 51.2% | | Settled(2) |
MP | | February 2015 | | 54% / 46% | | Settled(2) |
JCP&L | | November 2021 | | 48.6% / 51.4% | | 9.6% |
OE | | January 2009 | | 51% /49% | | 10.5% |
PE (West Virginia) | | February 2015 | | 51% / 49% | | Settled(2) |
PE (Maryland) | | October 2023 | | 47% / 53% | | 9.5% |
PN(1) | | January 2017 | | 47.4% /52.6% | | Settled(2) |
Penn(1) | | January 2017 | | 49.9% / 50.1% | | Settled(2) |
TE | | January 2009 | | 51% / 49% | | 10.5% |
WP(1) | | January 2017 | | 49.7% / 50.3% | | Settled(2) |
(1) Reflects filed debt/equity as final settlement/orders do not specifically include capital structure. Additionally, on January 1, 2024, FirstEnergy consolidated the Pennsylvania Companies into FE PA, making it a new, single operating entity, and will operate under the rate districts of the former Pennsylvania Companies.
(2) Commission-approved settlement agreements did not disclose ROE rates.
MARYLAND
PE operates under MDPSC approved base rates that were effective as of October 19, 2023. PE also provides SOS pursuant to a combination of settlement agreements, MDPSC orders and regulations, and statutory provisions. SOS supply is competitively procured in the form of rolling contracts of varying lengths through periodic auctions that are overseen by the MDPSC and a third-party monitor. Although settlements with respect to SOS supply for PE customers have expired, service continues in the same manner until changed by order of the MDPSC. PE recovers its costs plus a return for providing SOS.
On March 22, 2023, PE filed a base rate case with the MDPSC, utilizing a test year based on twelve months of actual 2022 data. The base rate case request included an annual increase in base distribution rates of $50.4 million, plus a request to establish a regulatory asset (or liability) to recover (or refund) in a subsequent base rate case the net differences between the amount of pension and OPEB expense requested in the proceeding (based on average expense from 2018 to 2022) and the actual annual amount each year using the delayed recognition method. The rate case additionally requested approval to continue an EDIS to fund three service reliability and resiliency programs, two new proposed programs to assist low-income customers and cost recovery of certain expenses associated with PE’s pilot electric vehicle charger program and its COVID-19 pandemic response. On October 18, 2023, the MDPSC approved an annual increase in base distribution rates of $28 million, effective October 19, 2023. The order denied PE’s request to establish a pension/OPEB regulatory asset (or liability), allowed recovery of most COVID-19 deferred costs; and rejected the continuation of PE’s EDIS, as PE's reliability has improved such that the surcharge recovery mechanism is no longer merited at this time. The MDPSC also ordered an independent audit of certain allocations from FESC to PE and denied recovery of approximately $12 million in rate base associated with certain corporate support costs recorded to capital accounts resulting from the FERC Audit. On January 3, 2024, the MDPSC issued an order granting PE’s request for reconsideration and increased PE’s allowed distribution rates by another $0.7 million.
The EmPOWER Maryland program requires each electric utility to file a plan to reduce electric consumption and demand 0.2% per year, up to the ultimate goal of 2% annual savings. PE recovers program investments with a return through an annually reconciled surcharge, with most costs subject to recovery over a five-year period with a return on the unamortized balance. Maryland law only allows for the utility to recover lost distribution revenue attributable to energy efficiency or demand reduction programs through a base rate case proceeding. On August 1, 2023, PE filed its proposed plan for the 2024-2026 cycle as required by the MDPSC. Consistent with a December 29, 2022, order by the MDPSC phasing out the ability of Maryland utilities to earn a return on EmPOWER investments, PE will be required to expense 33% of its EmPOWER program costs in 2024, 67% in 2025 and 100% in 2026. Notwithstanding the order to phase out PE’s ability to earn a return on its EmPOWER investments, all previously unamortized costs for prior cycles will continue to earn a return and be collected by the end of 2029, consistent with the plan PE submitted on January 11, 2023. In the 2024-2026 order issued on December 29, 2023, the period to pay down the amortized balances was extended through the end of 2031. Additionally at the direction of the MDPSC, PE together with other Maryland utilities are required to address GHG reductions in addition to energy efficiency. In compliance with the MDPSC directive, PE submitted three scenarios with projected costs over a three-year cycle of $310 million, $354 million, and $510 million, respectively. The MDPSC conducted hearings on the proposed plans for all Maryland utilities on November 6-8, 2023. On December 29, 2023, the MDPSC issued an order approving the $310 million scenario for most programs, with some modifications.
On April 17, 2023, PE submitted a proposal to the MDPSC seeking approval to end its PPA with the Warrior Run generating station. The PPA for Warrior Run was a requirement of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. PE’s Maryland customers currently pay a surcharge on their electric bill in connection with the Warrior Run PPA, which fluctuates from year to year based on the difference between what PE pays for the output of the plant and what PE is able to recover by reselling that output into PJM. PE negotiated a termination of the PPA, which the MDPSC approved on June 21, 2023, and became effective June 28, 2023, requiring it to pay Warrior Run a fixed amount of $51 million annually through 2029, for a total of $357 million. During the second quarter of 2023, a liability was established for the $357 million termination fee, of which $55 million was included in “Other current liabilities” and $302 million in “Other non-current liabilities”, and as the cost of the termination fee will be recovered through the current surcharge, an offsetting regulatory asset was established on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, and results in no impact to FirstEnergy’s or PE’s current or future earnings and is expected to result in savings for PE’s Maryland customers. On July 26, 2023, the MDPSC approved the change in surcharge, effective August 1, 2023, after previously approving the termination of the agreement.
NEW JERSEY
JCP&L operates under NJBPU approved rates that took effect as of January 1, 2021, and were effective for customers as of November 1, 2021. JCP&L provides BGS for retail customers who do not choose a third-party EGS and for customers of third- party EGSs that fail to provide the contracted service. All New Jersey EDCs participate in this competitive BGS procurement process and recover BGS costs directly from customers as a charge separate from base rates.
On March 16, 2023, JCP&L filed a base rate case with the NJBPU, utilizing a test year based on six months of actual data for the second half of calendar year 2022, and six months of forecasted data for the first half of calendar year 2023. The rate case requested an annual net increase in base distribution revenues of approximately $185 million, plus a request to establish a regulatory asset (or liability) to recover (or refund) in a subsequent base rate case the net differences between the amount of pension and OPEB expense requested in the proceeding (based on 2023 expense) and the actual annual amount each year using the delayed recognition method. JCP&L updated its base rate case in filings made on June 2, 2023 and August 7, 2023 to provide actual test-year data for the twelve months ended June 30, 2023, and update its proposed annual net increase in base rate distribution revenues to approximately $192 million. In addition to the above, JCP&L’s request includes, among other things, approval of two new proposed programs to assist low-income customers, cost recovery of certain investments and expenses associated with its electric vehicle and AMI programs, an update of its depreciation rates, modifications to its storm cost recovery, and tariff modifications to update standard construction costs. A procedural schedule was adopted with evidentiary hearings to be held the week of January 8, 2024. On October 17, 2023, JCP&L requested a suspension of the procedural schedule to enter into
formal settlement discussions, which all parties agreed, and the administrative law judge granted the same day. On February 2, 2024, JCP&L, joined by various parties, filed a stipulated settlement with the NJBPU resolving JCP&L’s request for a distribution base rate increase. The settlement provides for an $85 million annual base distribution revenues increase for JCP&L, which, if approved by the NJBPU, is expected to take effect February 15, 2024, and be effective for customers on June 1, 2024. Until those new rates become effective for customers, JCP&L would begin to amortize an existing regulatory liability totaling approximately $18 million to offset the base rate increase that otherwise would have occurred in this period. Under the base rate case settlement agreement, JCP&L also agreed to a two-phase reliability improvement plan to enhance the reliability related to 18 high-priority circuits, the first phase of which will begin no later than March 1, 2024 and represents an approximate investment of $95 million. JCP&L expects to amend its pending EnergizeNJ petition upon receipt of NJBPU approval of the base rate case settlement, to include the second phase of its reliability improvement plan that is expected to address any remaining high-priority circuits not addressed in the first phase. The settlement did not include the request to establish a regulatory asset (or liability) to recover (or refund) net differences between the amount of pension and OPEB expense requested in the proceeding and the actual annual amount each year using the delayed recognition method, however, JCP&L has the ability to pursue in a future separate proceeding.
JCP&L has implemented energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs in accordance with the New Jersey Clean Energy Act as approved by the NJBPU in April 2021. The NJBPU approved plans include recovery of lost revenues resulting from the programs and a three-year plan (July 2021-June 2024) including total program costs of $203 million, of which $160 million of investment is recovered over a ten-year amortization period with a return as well as $43 million in operations and maintenance expenses and financing costs recovered on an annual basis. On December 5, 2023, JCP&L filed a petition with the NJBPU for a six-month extension of EE&C Plan I, which was originally scheduled to end on June 30, 2024, but would end on December 31, 2024, with the extension. The proposed budget for the extension period would add approximately $69 million to the original program cost. Under the proposal, JCP&L would recover the costs of the extension period and the revenue impact of sales losses resulting therefrom through two separate tariff riders. On December 1, 2023, JCP&L filed a related petition with the NJBPU requesting approval of its EE&C Plan II, which covers the January 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027 period and has a proposed budget of approximately $964 million. EE&C Plan II consists of a portfolio of ten energy efficiency programs, one peak demand reduction program and one building decarbonization program. Under the proposal, JCP&L would recover its EE&C Plan II revenue requirements and lost revenues from reduced electricity sales associated with EE&C Plan II.
On March 6, 2023, the NJBPU issued final rules modifying its regulations to reflect its CTA policy in base rate cases to: (i) calculate savings using a five-year look back from the beginning of the test year; (ii) allocate 100% of CTA savings to customers; and (iii) exclude transmission assets of EDCs in the savings calculation. The final rules of practice were applied by JCP&L in its most recent base rate case filing described above.
On October 28, 2020, the NJBPU approved a stipulated settlement between JCP&L and various parties, resolving JCP&L’s request for distribution base rate increase. The settlement provided for a $94 million annual base distribution revenues increase for JCP&L based on an ROE of 9.6%, which became effective for customers on November 1, 2021. The settlement additionally provided that JCP&L would be subject to a management audit, which began in May 2021. On April 12, 2023, the NJBPU accepted the final management audit report for filing purposes and ordered that interested stakeholders file comments on the report by May 22, 2023, which deadline was extended until July 31, 2023. JCP&L filed its comments on July 31, 2023. The parties have filed responses.
On July 2, 2020, the NJBPU issued an order allowing New Jersey utilities to track and create a regulatory asset for future recovery of all prudently incurred incremental costs arising from the COVID-19 pandemic beginning March 9, 2020 and continuing until the New Jersey Governor issues an order stating that the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer in effect. New Jersey utilities can request recovery of such regulatory asset in a stand-alone COVID-19 regulatory asset filing or future base rate case. On October 28, 2020, the NJBPU issued an order expanding the scope of the proceeding to examine all pandemic issues, including recovery of the COVID-19 regulatory assets, by way of a generic proceeding. No moratorium on residential disconnections remains in effect for investor-owned electric utilities such as JCP&L. Legislation was enacted on March 25, 2022, prohibiting utilities from disconnecting electric service to customers that have applied for utility bill assistance before June 15, 2022 until such time as the state agency administering the assistance program makes a decision on the application and further requiring that all utilities offer a deferred payment arrangement meeting certain minimum criteria after the state agency’s decision on the application has been made. On July 17, 2023, JCP&L submitted a stand-alone filing to recover approximately $31 million, through October 1, 2023, in incremental costs and interest incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.
On September 17, 2021, in connection with Mid-Atlantic Offshore Development, LLC, a transmission company jointly owned by Shell New Energies US and EDF Renewables North America, JCP&L submitted a proposal to the NJBPU and PJM to build transmission infrastructure connecting offshore wind-generated electricity to the New Jersey power grid. On October 26, 2022, the JCP&L proposal was accepted, in part, in an order issued by NJBPU. The proposal, as accepted, included approximately $723 million in investments for JCP&L to both build new and upgrade existing transmission infrastructure. JCP&L’s proposal projects an investment ROE of 10.2% and includes the option for JCP&L to acquire up to a 20% equity stake in Mid-Atlantic Offshore Development, LLC. The resulting rates associated with the project are expected to be shared among the ratepayers of all New Jersey electric utilities. On April 17, 2023, JCP&L applied for the FERC “abandonment” transmission rates incentive, which would provide for recovery of 100% of the cancelled prudent project costs that are incurred after the incentive is approved, and 50% of the costs incurred prior to that date, in the event that some or all of the project is cancelled for reasons beyond
JCP&L’s control. FERC staff subsequently requested additional information on JCP&L’s application, which JCP&L provided. On August 21, 2023, FERC approved JCP&L’s application, effective August 22, 2023. On October 31, 2023, offshore wind developer, Orsted, announced plans to cease development of two offshore wind projects in New Jersey—Ocean Wind 1 and 2—having a combined planned capacity of 2,248 MW. At this time, Orsted’s announcement does not affect JCP&L’s awarded projects and JCP&L is moving forward with preconstruction activities for the planned transmission infrastructure. Construction is expected to begin in 2025.
Consistent with the commitments made in its proposal to the NJBPU, JCP&L formally submitted in November 2023 the first part of its application to the United States Department of Energy to finance a portion of the project using low-interest rate loans available under the United States Department of Energy’s Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Program of the IRA of 2022. JCP&L anticipates submitting the second part of its two-part application in the first quarter of 2024.
On November 9, 2023, JCP&L filed a petition for approval of its second EnergizeNJ with the NJBPU that would, among other things, support grid modernization, system resiliency and substation modernization in technologies designed to provide enhanced customer benefits. JCP&L proposes EnergizeNJ will be implemented over a five-year budget period with estimated costs of approximately $935 million over the deployment period, of which, $906 million is capital investments and $29 million is operating and maintenance expenses. Under the proposal, the costs of EnergizeNJ would be recovered through JCP&L's base rates via annual and semi-annual base rate adjustment filings. Public hearings have been requested but are not yet scheduled. JCP&L has requested that the NJBPU issue a final decision and order no later than May 22, 2024, based on a June 1, 2024, commencement date for EnergizeNJ. JCP&L anticipates filing amendments to the EnergizeNJ program after receipt of approval from the NJBPU of the base rate case stipulation that was filed on February 2, 2024.
OHIO
The Ohio Companies operate under PUCO-approved base distribution rates that became effective in 2009. The Ohio Companies currently operate under ESP IV, effective June 1, 2016 and continuing through May 31, 2024, that continues the supply of power to non-shopping customers at a market-based price set through an auction process. ESP IV also continues the Rider DCR, which supports continued investment related to the distribution system for the benefit of customers, with increased revenue caps of $20 million per year from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2022; and $15 million per year from June 1, 2022 through May 31, 2024. In addition, ESP IV includes: (1) continuation of a base distribution rate freeze through May 31, 2024; (2) a goal across FirstEnergy to reduce CO2 emissions by 90% below 2005 levels by 2045; and (3) contributions, totaling $51 million to: (a) fund energy conservation programs, economic development and job retention in the Ohio Companies’ service territories; (b) establish a fuel-fund in each of the Ohio Companies’ service territories to assist low-income customers; and (c) establish a Customer Advisory Council to ensure preservation and growth of the competitive market in Ohio.
On April 5, 2023, the Ohio Companies filed an application with the PUCO for approval of ESP V, for an eight-year term beginning June 1, 2024, and continuing through May 31, 2032. ESP V proposes to continue providing power to non-shopping customers at market-based prices set through an auction process, with process enhancements designed to reduce costs to customers. ESP V also proposes to continue riders supporting investment in the Ohio Companies’ distribution system, including Rider DCR with annual revenue cap increases of $15 to $21 million per year, based on reliability performance, and Rider AMI for recovery of approved grid modernization investments. ESP V proposes new riders to support continued maintenance of the distribution system, including vegetation management and storm restoration operating expense. In addition, ESP V proposes four-year energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs for residential and commercial customers, with cost recovery spread over eight years. ESP V further includes a commitment to spend $52 million in total over the eight-year term, without recovery from customers, on initiatives to assist low-income customers, education and incentives to help ensure customers have good experiences with electric vehicles. Hearings commenced on November 7, 2023 and concluded on December 6, 2023. On December 6, 2023, certain intervenors filed a motion requesting a limited stay of the Ohio Companies’ proposal to continue Rider DCR. The Ohio Companies contested the motion, which is pending.
On May 16, 2022, the Ohio Companies filed their application for determination of the existence of SEET under ESP IV for calendar year 2021, which demonstrated that each of the individual Ohio Companies did not have significantly excessive earnings. This matter remains pending before the PUCO.
On July 15, 2022, the Ohio Companies filed an application with the PUCO for approval of phase two of their distribution grid modernization plan that would, among other things, provide for the installation of an additional 700 thousand smart meters, distribution automation equipment on approximately 240 distribution circuits, voltage regulating equipment on approximately 220 distribution circuits, and other investments and pilot programs in related technologies designed to provide enhanced customer benefits. The Ohio Companies propose that phase two will be implemented over a four-year budget period with estimated capital investments of approximately $626 million and operations and maintenance expenses of approximately $144 million over the deployment period. Under the proposal, costs of phase two of the grid modernization plan would be recovered through the Ohio Companies’ AMI rider, pursuant to the terms and conditions approved in ESP IV. Hearings are scheduled to commence on April 16, 2024. On January 22, 2024, OCC filed a motion requesting a stay of phase two. The Ohio Companies contested the motion, which is pending.
On September 8, 2020, the OCC filed motions in the Ohio Companies’ corporate separation audit and DMR audit dockets, requesting the PUCO to open an investigation and management audit, hire an independent auditor, and require FirstEnergy to show it did not improperly use money collected from consumers or violate any utility regulatory laws, rules or orders in its activities regarding HB 6. On December 30, 2020, in response to the OCC's motion, the PUCO reopened the DMR audit docket, and directed PUCO staff to solicit a third-party auditor and conduct a full review of the DMR to ensure funds collected from customers through the DMR were only used for the purposes established in ESP IV. On June 2, 2021, the PUCO selected an auditor, and the auditor filed the final audit report on January 14, 2022, which made certain findings and recommendations. The report found that spending of DMR revenues was not required to be tracked, and that DMR revenues, like all rider revenues, are placed into the regulated money pool as a matter of routine, where the funds lose their identity. Therefore, the report could not suggest that DMR funds were used definitively for direct or indirect support for grid modernization. The report also concluded that there was no documented evidence that ties revenues from the DMR to lobbying for the passage of HB 6, but also could not rule out with certainty uses of DMR funds to support the passage of HB 6. The report further recommended that the regulated companies' money pool be audited more frequently and the Ohio Companies adopt formal dividend policies. Final comments and responses were filed by parties during the second quarter of 2022.
On September 15, 2020, the PUCO opened a new proceeding to review the political and charitable spending by the Ohio Companies in support of HB 6 and the subsequent referendum effort, and directing the Ohio Companies to show cause, demonstrating that the costs of any political or charitable spending in support of HB 6, or the subsequent referendum effort, were not included, directly or indirectly, in any rates or charges paid by customers. The Ohio Companies initially filed a response stating that the costs of any political or charitable spending in support of HB 6, or the subsequent referendum effort, were not included, directly or indirectly, in any rates or charges paid by customers, but on August 6, 2021, filed a supplemental response explaining that, in light of the facts set forth in the DPA and the findings of the Rider DCR audit report further discussed below, political or charitable spending in support of HB 6, or the subsequent referendum effort, affected pole attachment rates paid by approximately $15 thousand. On October 26, 2021, the OCC filed a motion requesting the PUCO to order an independent external audit to investigate FE’s political and charitable spending related to HB 6, and to appoint an independent review panel to retain and oversee the auditor. In November and December 2021, parties filed comments and reply comments regarding the Ohio Companies’ original and supplemental responses to the PUCO’s September 15, 2020, show cause directive. On May 4, 2022, the PUCO selected a third-party auditor to determine whether the show cause demonstration submitted by the Ohio Companies is sufficient to ensure that the cost of any political or charitable spending in support of HB 6 or the subsequent referendum effort was not included, directly or indirectly, in any rates or charges paid by ratepayers.
In connection with an ongoing audit of the Ohio Companies’ policies and procedures relating to the code of conduct rules between affiliates, on November 4, 2020, the PUCO initiated an additional corporate separation audit as a result of the FirstEnergy leadership transition announcement made on October 29, 2020, as further discussed below. The additional audit is to ensure compliance by the Ohio Companies and their affiliates with corporate separation laws and the Ohio Companies’ corporate separation plan. The additional audit is for the period from November 2016 through October 2020. The final audit report was filed on September 13, 2021. The audit report makes no findings of major non-compliance with Ohio corporate separation requirements, minor non-compliance with eight requirements, and findings of compliance with 23 requirements. Parties filed comments and reply comments on the audit report.
In connection with an ongoing annual audit of the Ohio Companies’ Rider DCR for 2020, and as a result of disclosures in FirstEnergy’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (filed on February 18, 2021), the PUCO expanded the scope of the audit on March 10, 2021, to include a review of certain transactions that were either improperly classified, misallocated, or lacked supporting documentation, and to determine whether funds collected from customers were used to pay the vendors, and if so, whether or not the funds associated with those payments should be returned to customers through Rider DCR or through an alternative proceeding. On August 3, 2021, the auditor filed its final report on this phase of the audit, and the parties submitted comments and reply comments on this audit report in October 2021. Additionally, on September 29, 2021, the PUCO expanded the scope of the audit in this proceeding to determine if the costs of the naming rights for FirstEnergy Stadium have been recovered from the Ohio Companies’ customers. On November 19, 2021, the auditor filed its final report, in which the auditor concluded that the FirstEnergy Stadium naming rights expenses were not recovered from Ohio customers. On December 15, 2021, the PUCO further expanded the scope of the audit to include an investigation into an apparent nondisclosure of a side agreement in the Ohio Companies’ ESP IV settlement proceedings, but stayed its expansion of the audit until otherwise ordered by the PUCO.
On August 16, 2022, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio requested that the PUCO stay the above pending HB 6- related matters for a period of six months, which request was granted by the PUCO on August 24, 2022. On February 22, 2023, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio again requested that the PUCO stay the above pending HB-6 related matters for a period of six months, which request was granted by the PUCO on March 8, 2023. On August 10, 2023, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio requested that the PUCO stay the above pending HB 6-related matters for a period of six additional months, which was approved by the PUCO on August 23, 2023. On September 22, 2023, OCC filed an application for rehearing challenging the PUCO’s August 23, 2023, order, which the PUCO denied on October 18, 2023. On November 17, 2023, OCC filed an application for rehearing challenging the October 18, 2023 entry to the extent the PUCO decided not to stay ESP V as well as Grid Mod I and Grid Mod II along with the investigations. On November 27, 2023, the Ohio Companies filed a memorandum contra OCC’s application for rehearing. The four cases remain stayed in their entirety, including discovery and motions, and all related procedural schedules are vacated.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, motions were filed with the PUCO requesting that the PUCO amend the Ohio Companies’ riders for collecting the OVEC-related charges required by HB 6 to provide for refunds in the event such provisions of HB 6 are repealed. Neither the Ohio Companies nor FE benefit from the OVEC-related charges the Ohio Companies collect. Instead, the Ohio Companies are further required by HB 6 to remit all the OVEC-related charges they collect to non-FE Ohio electric distribution utilities. The Ohio Companies contested the motions, which are pending before the PUCO.
On May 15, 2023, the Ohio Companies filed their application for determination of the existence of SEET under ESP IV for calendar year 2022, which demonstrated that each of the individual Ohio Companies did not have significantly excessive earnings. This matter remains pending before the PUCO.
See Note 14, "Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies" below for additional details on the government investigations and subsequent litigation surrounding the investigation of HB 6.
PENNSYLVANIA
The Pennsylvania Companies operated under rates approved by the PPUC, effective as of January 27, 2017. On January 1, 2024, each of the Pennsylvania Companies merged with and into FE PA. As a result of the PA Consolidation, FE PA will have five rate districts in Pennsylvania – four that correspond to the territories previously serviced by ME, PN, Penn, and WP and one rate district that corresponds to WP’s service provided to The Pennsylvania State University. The rate districts created by the PA Consolidation will continue the current rate structure of ME, PN, Penn, and WP until the earlier of 2033 or in the fourth base rate case filed after January 1, 2025.
Pursuant to Pennsylvania Act 129 of 2008 and PPUC orders, the Pennsylvania Companies implemented energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs with demand reduction targets, relative to 2007 to 2008 peak demands, at 2.9% MW for ME, 3.3% MW for PN, 2.0% MW for Penn, and 2.5% MW for WP; and energy consumption reduction targets, as a percentage of the Pennsylvania Companies’ historic 2009 to 2010 reference load at 3.1% MWh for ME, 3.0% MWh for PN, 2.7% MWh for Penn, and 2.4% MWh for WP. The fourth phase of FE PA’s energy efficiency and peak demand reduction program, which runs for the five -year period beginning June 1, 2021 through May 31, 2026, was approved by the PPUC on June 18, 2020, providing through cost recovery of approximately $390 million to be recovered through Energy Efficiency and Conservation Phase IV Riders for each FE PA rate district.
Pennsylvania EDCs are permitted to seek PPUC approval of an LTIIP for infrastructure improvements and costs related to highway relocation projects, after which a DSIC may be approved to recover LTIIP costs. On January 16, 2020, the PPUC approved the Pennsylvania Companies’ LTIIPs for the five-year period beginning January 1, 2020 and ending December 31, 2024 for a total capital investment of approximately $572 million for certain infrastructure improvement initiatives. On June 25, 2021, the Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate filed a complaint against Penn’s quarterly DSIC rate, disputing the recoverability of the Companies’ automated distribution management system investment under the DSIC mechanism. On January 26, 2022, the parties filed a joint petition for settlement that resolves all issues in this matter, which was approved by the PPUC without modification on April 14, 2022.
Following the Pennsylvania Companies’ 2016 base rate proceedings, the PPUC ruled in a separate proceeding related to the DSIC mechanisms that the Pennsylvania Companies were not required to reflect federal and state income tax deductions related to DSIC-eligible property in DSIC rates. The decision was appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and in July 2021 the court upheld the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court’s reversal of the PPUC’s decision and remanded the matter back to the PPUC for determination as to how DSIC calculations shall account for accumulated deferred income taxes and state taxes. The PPUC issued the order as directed.
On March 6, 2023, FirstEnergy filed applications with the PPUC, NYPSC and FERC seeking approval to consolidate the Pennsylvania Companies into a new, single operating entity. The PA Consolidation includes, among other steps: (a) the transfer of certain Pennsylvania-based transmission assets owned by WP to KATCo, (b) the contribution of Class B equity interests of MAIT then held by PN and ME to FE (and ultimately transferred to FET as part of the FET Minority Equity Interest Sale as further described above), (c) the formation of FE PA and (d) the merger of each of the Pennsylvania Companies with and into FE PA, with FE PA surviving such mergers as the successor-in-interest to all assets and liabilities of the Pennsylvania Companies. On August 30, 2023, the parties filed a settlement agreement recommending that the PPUC approve the PA Consolidation subject to the terms of the settlement, which include among other things, $650 thousand over five years in bill assistance for income-eligible customers and the Pennsylvania Companies’ commitment to (i) not seek full distribution rate unification until the earlier of 10 years or in the fourth base rate case filed after January 1, 2025 and (ii) track and share with customers certain operational and administrative efficiency costs associated with the PA Consolidation. The PPUC, NYPSC and FERC approved FirstEnergy’s applications on December 7, 2023, November 16, 2023, and August 14, 2023, respectively. The transaction closed on January 1, 2024 making FE PA FirstEnergy's only regulated utility in Pennsylvania.
On May 5, 2023, FirstEnergy and Brookfield submitted applications to FERC and to the PPUC to facilitate the FET Minority Equity Interest Sale. On May 12, 2023, the parties also filed an application with the VSCC, which was approved on June 20, 2023. On August 14, 2023, FERC issued an order approving the FET Minority Equity Interest Sale. On November 24, 2023,
CFIUS notified FET, Brookfield and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority that it has determined that there were no unresolved national security issues and its review of the transaction was concluded. On November 29, 2023, the parties filed a settlement agreement recommending that the PPUC approve the transaction subject to the terms of the settlement, which include among other things, a number of ring-fencing provisions and a commitment to improve transmission reliability over the next five years. The settlement is currently pending PPUC approval.
WEST VIRGINIA
MP and PE provide electric service to all customers through traditional cost-based, regulated utility ratemaking and operate under WVPSC-approved rates that became effective in February 2015. MP and PE recover net power supply costs, including fuel costs, purchased power costs and related expenses, net of related market sales revenue through the ENEC. MP’s and PE’s ENEC rate is updated annually.
On August 25, 2022, MP and PE filed with the WVPSC their annual ENEC case requesting an increase in ENEC rates of $183.8 million beginning January 1, 2023, which represents a 12.2% increase to the rates then in effect. The increase was driven by an under recovery during the review period (July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022) of approximately $145 million due to higher coal, reagent, and emission allowance expenses. This filing additionally addresses, among other things, the WVPSC’s May 2022 request for a prudence review of current rates. At a hearing on December 8, 2022, the parties in the case presented a unanimous settlement to increase rates by approximately $92 million, effective January 1, 2023, and carry over to MP and PE’s 2023 ENEC case, approximately $92 million at a carrying charge of 4%. In an order dated December 30, 2022, the WVPSC approved the settlement with respect to the proposed rate increase, but MP and PE rates remain subject to a prudence review in their 2023 ENEC case. The order also instructed MP to evaluate the feasibility of purchasing the 1,300 MW Pleasants Power Station and file a summary of the evaluation, which MP and PE filed on March 31, 2023. MP and PE provided the WVPSC with regular status reports throughout the second quarter of 2023 regarding the process of their evaluation. Subsequently, the owner of Pleasants entered into an agreement to sell Pleasants to an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Omnis Global Technologies, LLC, which transaction closed on August 1, 2023. As a result, MP and PE ceased consideration of the possible purchase of Pleasants and on August 30, 2023, the WVPSC closed the proceeding.
On August 31, 2023, MP and PE filed with the WVPSC their annual ENEC case requesting an increase in ENEC rates of $167.5 million beginning January 1, 2024, which represents a 9.9% increase in overall rates. This increase, which was driven primarily by higher fuel expenses, includes the approximate $92 million carried over from the 2022 ENEC proceeding and a portion of the approximately $267 million under recovery balance at the end of the review period (July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023). The remaining $75.6 million of the under recovery balance not recovered in 2024 will be deferred for collection during 2025, with an annual carrying charge of 4%. A hearing was held on November 30, 2023, at which time a joint stipulation for settlement that was agreed to by all but one party was presented to the WVPSC. The settlement provides for a net $55.4 million increase in ENEC rates beginning March 27, 2024 with the net deferred ENEC balance of approximately $255 million to be recovered through 2026. There will be no 2024 ENEC case unless MP and PE over or under recover more than $50 million than the 2024 ENEC balance and a party elects to invoke a case filing. An order is expected by March 2024.
On November 22, 2021, MP and PE filed with the WVPSC their plan to construct 50 MWs of solar generation at five sites in West Virginia. The plan includes a tariff to offer solar power to West Virginia customers and cost recovery for MP and PE through a surcharge for any solar investment not fully subscribed by their customers. A hearing was held in mid-March 2022 and on April 21, 2022, the WVPSC issued an order approving, effective May 1, 2022, the requested tariff and requiring MP and PE to subscribe at least 85% of the planned 50 MWs before seeking final tariff approval. MP and PE must seek separate approval from the WVPSC to recover any solar generation costs in excess of the approved tariff. On April 24, 2023, MP and PE sought final tariff approval from the WVPSC for three of the five solar sites, representing 30 MWs of generation, and requested approval of a surcharge to recover any costs above the final approved tariff. The first solar generation site went into service in January 2024 and construction of the remaining four sites are expected to be completed no later than the end of 2025 at a total investment cost of approximately $110 million. On August 23, 2023, the WVPSC approved the customer surcharge and granted approval to construct three of the five solar sites. The surcharge went into effect January 1, 2024.
On January 13, 2023, MP and PE filed a request with the WVPSC seeking approval of new depreciation rates for existing and future capital assets. Specifically, MP and PE are seeking to increase depreciation expense by approximately $76 million per year, primarily for regulated generation-related assets. Any depreciation rates approved by the WVPSC would not become effective until new base rates were established. On August 22, 2023, a unanimous settlement of the case was filed recommending a $33 million per year increase in depreciation expense, effective April 1, 2024. An order from the WVPSC is expected in the first quarter 2024.
On March 2, 2023, the WVPSC ordered an audit of MP and PE focused on: (i) the lobbying and promotional/image building expenses, including those related to HB 6, incurred by MP and PE from 2018 to 2022 (ii) intra-corporate charges, (iii) the accounting for charges included in the ENEC cost recovery accounts of MP and PE during the same time period, and (iv) review and report on the findings, including those specific to MP and PE, set forth in the FERC Audit described below as well as a review and report of the responses by MP and PE thereto. The audit began in September 2023 and concluded with a filing of the report on December 28, 2023. The audit found no evidence that HB 6 related costs were included in the 2022 test year, and no errors or omission were identified that would materially affect lobbying and image building costs or expenses charged to the
ENEC for the period 2018 to 2022. Additionally, there were several recommended adjustments and recommendations, however, none are expected to have a material effect on FirstEnergy, MP or PE. The report was evaluated as part of the ongoing base rate case.
On May 31, 2023, MP and PE filed a base rate case with the WVPSC requesting a total revenue increase of approximately $207 million utilizing a test year of 2022 with adjustments plus a request to establish a regulatory asset (or liability) to recover (or refund) in a subsequent base rate case the net differences between the amount of pension and OPEB expense requested in the proceeding (based on average expense from 2018 to 2022) and the actual annual amount each year using the delayed recognition method. Among other things, the increase includes the approximate $76 million requested in a depreciation case filed on January 13, 2023 and described more fully above, and amounts to support a new low-income customer advocacy program, storm restoration work and service reliability investments. New rates are expected to be effective by the end of March 2024. On January 23, 2024, MP, PE and various parties filed with a joint settlement agreement with the WVPSC, which recommends a base rate increase of $105 million, inclusive of the $33 million increase in depreciation expense. Additionally, the settlement includes a new low-income customer advocacy program, a pilot program for service reliability investments and recovery of costs related to storm restoration, retired generation assets and COVID-19. The settlement did not include the request to establish a regulatory asset (or liability) for recover (or refund) associated with pension and OPEB expense, however, it did not preclude MP and PE from pursuing that in a future separate proceeding. An order is expected by the end of the first quarter of 2024 with new rates to be effective March 27, 2024.
On August 31, 2023, MP and PE filed its biennial review of their vegetation management program and surcharge. MP and PE have proposed an approximate $17 million increase in the surcharge rates, due to an under recovery in the prior two-year period and increased forecast costs. The case was unanimously settled by the parties on November 29, 2023, approved by the WVPSC on January 8, 2024, and the $17 million increase proposed by MP and PE went into effect on January 1, 2024. See Note 14, “Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies - Environmental Matters - Clean Water Act" below, for additional details on the EPA's ELG.
FERC REGULATORY MATTERS
Under the Federal Power Act, FERC regulates rates for interstate wholesale sales and transmission of electric power, regulatory accounting and reporting under the Uniform System of Accounts, and other matters, including construction and operation of hydroelectric projects. With respect to their wholesale services and rates, the Utilities, AE Supply and the Transmission Companies are subject to regulation by FERC. FERC regulations require JCP&L, MP, PE, WP and the Transmission Companies to provide open access transmission service at FERC-approved rates, terms and conditions. Transmission facilities of JCP&L, MP, PE, WP and the Transmission Companies are subject to functional control by PJM and transmission service using their transmission facilities is provided by PJM under the PJM Tariff. On January 1, 2024, WP transferred certain of its Pennsylvania-based transmission assets to KATCo.
The following table summarizes the key terms of rate orders in effect for transmission customer billings for FirstEnergy's transmission owner entities as of December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Company | | Rates Effective | | Capital Structure | | Allowed ROE |
ATSI | | January 2015 | | Actual (13-month average) | | 10.38% |
JCP&L | | January 2020 | | Actual (13-month average) | | 10.20% |
MP | | January 2021 | | Lower of Actual (13-month average) or 56% | | 10.45% |
PE | | January 2021 | | Lower of Actual (13-month average) or 56% | | 10.45% |
WP(1) | | January 2021 | | Lower of Actual (13-month average) or 56% | | 10.45% |
MAIT | | July 2017 | | Lower of Actual (13-month average) or 60% | | 10.3% |
TrAIL | | July 2008 | | Actual (year-end) | | 12.7%(2) / 11.7%(3) |
(1) On January 1, 2024, WP transferred certain of its Pennsylvania-based transmission assets to KATCo
(2) TrAIL the Line and Black Oak Static Var Compensator
(3) All other projects
FERC regulates the sale of power for resale in interstate commerce in part by granting authority to public utilities to sell wholesale power at market-based rates upon showing that the seller cannot exert market power in generation or transmission or erect barriers to entry into markets. The Utilities and AE Supply each have the necessary authorization from FERC to sell their wholesale power, if any, in interstate commerce at market-based rates, although in the case of the Utilities major wholesale purchases remain subject to review and regulation by the relevant state commissions.
Federally enforceable mandatory reliability standards apply to the bulk electric system and impose certain operating, record-keeping and reporting requirements on the Utilities, AE Supply, and the Transmission Companies. NERC is the Electric Reliability Organization designated by FERC to establish and enforce these reliability standards, although NERC has delegated day-to-day implementation and enforcement of these reliability standards to six regional entities, including RFC. All of the facilities that FirstEnergy operates are located within the RFC region. FirstEnergy actively participates in the NERC and RFC stakeholder processes, and otherwise monitors and manages its companies in response to the ongoing development, implementation and enforcement of the reliability standards implemented and enforced by RFC.
FirstEnergy believes that it is in material compliance with all currently effective and enforceable reliability standards. Nevertheless, in the course of operating its extensive electric utility systems and facilities, FirstEnergy occasionally learns of isolated facts or circumstances that could be interpreted as excursions from the reliability standards. If and when such occurrences are found, FirstEnergy develops information about the occurrence and develops a remedial response to the specific circumstances, including in appropriate cases “self-reporting” an occurrence to RFC. Moreover, it is clear that NERC, RFC and FERC will continue to refine existing reliability standards as well as to develop and adopt new reliability standards. Any inability on FirstEnergy’s part to comply with the reliability standards for its bulk electric system could result in the imposition of financial penalties, or obligations to upgrade or build transmission facilities, that could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
FERC Audit
FERC’s Division of Audits and Accounting initiated a nonpublic audit of FESC in February 2019. Among other matters, the audit is evaluating FirstEnergy’s compliance with certain accounting and reporting requirements under various FERC regulations. On February 4, 2022, FERC filed the final audit report for the period of January 1, 2015 through September 30, 2021, which included several findings and recommendations that FirstEnergy has accepted. The audit report included a finding and related recommendation on FirstEnergy’s methodology for allocation of certain corporate support costs to regulatory capital accounts under certain FERC regulations and reporting. Effective in the first quarter of 2022 and in response to the finding, FirstEnergy had implemented a new methodology for the allocation of these corporate support costs to regulatory capital accounts for its regulated distribution and transmission companies on a prospective basis. With the assistance of an independent outside firm, FirstEnergy completed an analysis during the third quarter of 2022 of these costs and how it impacted certain FERC-jurisdictional wholesale transmission customer rates for the audit period of 2015 through 2021. As a result of this analysis, FirstEnergy recorded in the third quarter of 2022 approximately $45 million ($34 million after-tax) in expected customer refunds, plus interest, due to its wholesale transmission customers and reclassified approximately $195 million of certain transmission capital assets to operating expenses for the audit period, of which $90 million ($67 million after-tax) are not expected to be recoverable and impacted FirstEnergy’s earnings since they relate to costs capitalized during stated transmission rate time periods. FirstEnergy is currently recovering approximately $105 million of costs reclassified to operating expenses in its transmission formula rate revenue requirements, of which $13 million of costs have been recovered as of December 31, 2023. On December 8, 2023, FERC audit staff issued a letter advising that two unresolved audit matters, primarily related to FirstEnergy’s plan to recover the reclassified operating expenses in formula transmission rates, were being referred to other offices within FERC for further review. These reclassifications also resulted in a reduction to the Regulated Transmission segment’s rate base by approximately $160 million, which is not expected to materially impact FirstEnergy or the segment’s future earnings. The expected wholesale transmission customer refunds were recognized as a reduction to revenue, and the amount of reclassified transmission capital assets that are not expected to be recoverable were recognized within “Other operating expenses” at the Regulated Transmission segment and on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Furthermore, FirstEnergy’s distribution utilities are in the process of addressing the outcomes of the FERC Audit with the applicable state commissions and proceedings, which includes seeking continued rate base treatment of approximately $310 million of certain corporate support costs allocated to distribution capital assets. If FirstEnergy is unable to recover these transmission or distribution costs, it could result in future charges and/or adjustments and have an adverse impact on FirstEnergy’s financial condition.
ATSI ROE – Ohio Consumers Counsel v. ATSI, et al.
On February 24, 2022, the OCC filed a complaint with FERC against ATSI, AEP’s Ohio affiliates and American Electric Power Service Corporation, and Duke Energy Ohio, LLC asserting that FERC should reduce the ROE utilized in the utilities’ transmission formula rates by eliminating the 50 basis point adder associated with RTO membership, effective February 24, 2022. The OCC contends that this result is required because Ohio law mandates that transmission owning utilities join an RTO and that the 50 basis point adder is applicable only where RTO membership is voluntary. On December 15, 2022, FERC denied the complaint as to ATSI and Duke, but granted it as to AEP. AEP and OCC appealed FERC’s orders to the Sixth Circuit. FirstEnergy is actively participating in the appeal and the case remains pending. FirstEnergy is unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
Transmission ROE Methodology
On March 20, 2020, FERC initiated a rulemaking proceeding on the transmission rate incentives provisions of Section 219 of the 2005 Energy Policy Act. FirstEnergy submitted comments through the Edison Electric Institute and as part of a consortium of PJM Transmission Owners. In a supplemental rulemaking proceeding that was initiated on April 15, 2021, FERC requested comments on, among other things, whether to require utilities that have been members of an RTO for three years or more and
that have been collecting an “RTO membership” ROE incentive adder to file tariff updates that would terminate collection of the incentive adder. Initial comments on the proposed rule were filed on June 25, 2021, and reply comments were filed on July 26, 2021. The rulemaking remains pending before FERC. FirstEnergy is a member of PJM and its transmission subsidiaries could be affected by the supplemental proposed rule. FirstEnergy participated in comments on the supplemental rulemaking that were submitted by a group of PJM transmission owners and by various industry trade groups. If there were to be any changes to FirstEnergy's transmission incentive ROE, such changes will be applied on a prospective basis.
Allegheny Power Zone Transmission Formula Rate Filings
On October 29, 2020, MP, PE and WP filed tariff amendments with FERC to implement a forward-looking formula transmission rate, to be effective January 1, 2021. In addition, on October 30, 2020, KATCo filed a proposed new tariff to establish a forward-looking formula rate and requested that the new rate become effective January 1, 2021. In its filing, KATCo explained that while it currently owns no transmission assets, it may build new transmission facilities in the Allegheny zone, and that it may seek required state and federal authorizations to acquire transmission assets from PE and WP by January 1, 2022. These transmission rate filings were accepted for filing by FERC on December 31, 2020, effective January 1, 2021, subject to refund, pending further hearing and settlement procedures and were consolidated into a single proceeding. MP, PE and WP, and KATCo filed uncontested settlement agreements with FERC on January 18, 2023. Also on January 18, 2023, MP, PE and WP filed a motion for interim rates to implement certain aspects of the settled rate. The interim rates were approved by the FERC Chief Administrative Law Judge and took effect on January 1, 2023. As a result of the filed settlement, FirstEnergy recognized a $25 million pre-tax charge during the fourth quarter of 2022, which reflects the difference between amounts originally recorded as assets and amounts which will ultimately be recovered from customers as a result. On May 4, 2023, FERC issued an order approving the settlement agreement without condition or modification. Pursuant to the order, a compliance filing was filed on May 19, 2023, that implemented the terms of the settlement. On June 26, 2023, FERC issued a letter order approving the compliance filing.
Transmission Planning Supplemental Projects: Ohio Consumers Counsel v ATSI, et al.
On September 27, 2023, the OCC filed a complaint against ATSI, PJM and other transmission utilities in Ohio alleging that the PJM Tariff and operating agreement are unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory because they include no provisions to ensure PJM’s review and approval for the planning, need, prudence and cost-effectiveness of the PJM Tariff Attachment M-3 “Supplemental Projects.” Supplemental Projects are projects that are planned and constructed to address local needs on the transmission system. The OCC demands that FERC: (i) require PJM to review supplemental projects for need, prudence and cost-effectiveness; (ii) appoint an independent transmission monitor to assist PJM in such review; and (iii) require that Supplemental Projects go into rate base only through a “stated rate” procedure whereby prior FERC approval would be needed for projects with costs that exceed an established threshold. ATSI and the other transmission utilities in Ohio and PJM filed comments and the complaint is pending before FERC.
14. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES
GUARANTEES AND OTHER ASSURANCES
FirstEnergy has various financial and performance guarantees and indemnifications which are issued in the normal course of business. These contracts include performance guarantees, stand-by LOCs, debt guarantees, surety bonds and indemnifications. FirstEnergy enters into these arrangements to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party.
As of December 31, 2023, outstanding guarantees and other assurances aggregated approximately $815 million, consisting of parental guarantees on behalf of its consolidated subsidiaries ($515 million) and other assurances ($300 million).
COLLATERAL AND CONTINGENT-RELATED FEATURES
In the normal course of business, FE and its subsidiaries may enter into physical or financially settled contracts for the sale and purchase of electric capacity, energy, fuel and emission allowances. Certain agreements contain provisions that require FE or its subsidiaries to post collateral. This collateral may be posted in the form of cash or credit support with thresholds contingent upon FE's or its subsidiaries' credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. The collateral and credit support requirements vary by contract and by counterparty.
As of December 31, 2023, $89 million of net cash collateral has been posted by FE or its subsidiaries and is included in "Prepaid taxes and other current assets" on FirstEnergy's Consolidated Balance Sheets. FE or its subsidiaries are holding $27 million of net cash collateral as of December 31, 2023, from certain generation suppliers, and such amount is included in "Other current liabilities" on FirstEnergy's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
These credit-risk-related contingent features stipulate that if the subsidiary were to be downgraded or lose its investment grade credit rating (based on its senior unsecured debt rating), it would be required to provide additional collateral. The following table discloses the potential additional credit rating contingent contractual collateral obligations as of December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Potential Collateral Obligations | | | | | | Utilities and Transmission Companies | | FE | | Total |
| | | | | | (In millions) |
Contractual Obligations for Additional Collateral | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Upon Further Downgrade | | | | | | $ | 62 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 62 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Surety Bonds (collateralized amount)(1) | | | | | | 86 | | | 79 | | | 165 | |
Total Exposure from Contractual Obligations | | | | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 79 | | | $ | 227 | |
(1) Surety Bonds are not tied to a credit rating. Surety Bonds' impact assumes maximum contractual obligations, which is ordinarily 100% of the face amount of the surety bond except with respect to $39 million of surety obligations for which the collateral obligation is capped at 60% of the face amount, and typical obligations require 30 days to cure.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Various federal, state and local authorities regulate FirstEnergy with regard to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, and other environmental matters. While FirstEnergy’s environmental policies and procedures are designed to achieve compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, such laws and regulations are subject to periodic review and potential revision by the implementing agencies. FirstEnergy cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of any of these reviews or how any future actions taken as a result thereof may materially impact its business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Clean Air Act
FirstEnergy complies with SO2 and NOx emission reduction requirements under the CAA and SIP by burning lower-sulfur fuel, utilizing combustion controls and post-combustion controls and/or using emission allowances.
CSAPR requires reductions of NOx and SO2 emissions in two phases (2015 and 2017), ultimately capping SO2 emissions in affected states to 2.4 million tons annually and NOx emissions to 1.2 million tons annually. CSAPR allows trading of NOx and SO2 emission allowances between power plants located in the same state and interstate trading of NOx and SO2 emission allowances with some restrictions. On July 28, 2015, the D.C. Circuit ordered the EPA to reconsider the CSAPR caps on NOx and SO2 emissions from power plants in 13 states, including West Virginia. This followed the 2014 U.S. Supreme Court ruling generally upholding the EPA’s regulatory approach under CSAPR but questioning whether the EPA required upwind states to reduce emissions by more than their contribution to air pollution in downwind states. The EPA issued a CSAPR Update on September 7, 2016, reducing summertime NOx emissions from power plants in 22 states in the eastern U.S., including West Virginia, beginning in 2017. Various states and other stakeholders appealed the CSAPR Update to the D.C. Circuit in November and December 2016. On September 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit remanded the CSAPR Update to the EPA citing that the rule did not eliminate upwind states’ significant contributions to downwind states’ air quality attainment requirements within applicable attainment deadlines.
Also in March 2018, the State of New York filed a CAA Section 126 petition with the EPA alleging that NOx emissions from nine states (including West Virginia) significantly contribute to New York’s inability to attain the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The petition sought suitable emission rate limits for large stationary sources that are allegedly affecting New York’s air quality within the three years allowed by CAA Section 126. On September 20, 2019, the EPA denied New York’s CAA Section 126 petition. On October 29, 2019, the State of New York appealed the denial of its petition to the D.C. Circuit. On July 14, 2020, the D.C. Circuit reversed and remanded the New York petition to the EPA for further consideration. On March 15, 2021, the EPA issued a revised CSAPR Update that addressed, among other things, the remands of the prior CSAPR Update and the New York Section 126 petition. In December 2021, MP purchased NOx emissions allowances to comply with 2021 ozone season requirements. On April 6, 2022, the EPA published proposed rules seeking to impose further significant reductions in EGU NOx emissions in 25 upwind states, including West Virginia, with the stated purpose of allowing downwind states to attain or maintain compliance with the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. On February 13, 2023, the EPA disapproved 21 SIPs, which was a prerequisite for the EPA to issue a final Good Neighbor Plan or FIP. On June 5, 2023, the EPA issued the final Good Neighbor Plan with an effective date 60 days thereafter. Certain states, including West Virginia, have appealed the disapprovals of their respective SIPs, and some of those states have obtained stays of those disapprovals precluding the Good Neighbor Plan from taking effect in those states. On August 10, 2023, the 4th Circuit granted West Virginia an interim stay of the disapproval of its SIP and on January 10, 2024, after a hearing held on October 27, 2023, granted a full stay which precludes the Good Neighbor Plan from going into effect in West Virginia. In addition to West Virginia, certain other states, and certain trade organizations, including the Midwest Ozone Group of which FE is a member, have separately appealed and filed motions to stay the Good Neighbor Plan itself at the D.C. Circuit. On September 25, 2023, the D.C. Circuit denied the motions to stay the Good Neighbor Plan. On October 13, 2023, the aggrieved parties filed an Emergency Application for an Immediate Stay of the Good Neighbor Plan with the U.S. Supreme Court, which remains pending. Oral argument is scheduled for February 21, 2024.
Climate Change
In September 2016, the U.S. joined in adopting the agreement reached on December 12, 2015, at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meetings in Paris to reduce GHGs. The Paris Agreement’s non-binding obligations to limit global warming to below two degrees Celsius became effective on November 4, 2016. On June 1, 2017, the Trump Administration announced that the U.S. would cease all participation in the Paris Agreement. On January 20, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order re-adopting the agreement on behalf of the U.S. There are several initiatives to reduce GHG emissions at the state, federal and international level. Certain northeastern states are participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and western states led by California, have implemented programs, primarily cap and trade mechanisms, to control emissions of certain GHGs. Additional policies reducing GHG emissions, such as demand reduction programs, renewable portfolio standards and renewable subsidies have been implemented across the nation.
FirstEnergy has pledged to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 in GHGs within FirstEnergy’s direct operational control (Scope 1). With respect to our coal-fired plants in West Virginia, we have identified that the end of the useful life date is 2035 for Fort Martin and 2040 for Harrison. Determination of the useful life of the regulated coal-fired generation could result in changes in depreciation, and/or continued collection of net plant in rates after retirement, securitization, sale, impairment, or regulatory disallowances. If MP is unable to recover these costs, it could have a material adverse effect on FirstEnergy’s and/or MP’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. Furthermore, FirstEnergy cannot currently estimate the financial impact of climate change policies, although potential legislative or regulatory programs restricting CO2 emissions, or litigation alleging damages from GHG emissions, could require material capital and other expenditures or result in changes to its operations.
In December 2009, the EPA released its final “Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for GHGs under the Clean Air Act,” concluding that concentrations of several key GHGs constitute an “endangerment” and may be regulated as “air pollutants” under the CAA and mandated measurement and reporting of GHG emissions from certain sources, including electric generating plants. Subsequently, the EPA released its final CPP regulations in August 2015 to reduce CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired EGUs and finalized separate regulations imposing CO2 emission limits for new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired EGUs. Numerous states and private parties filed appeals and motions to stay the CPP with the D.C. Circuit in October 2015. On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the rule during the pendency of the challenges to the D.C. Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, an executive order, entitled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth,” instructed the EPA to review the CPP and related rules addressing GHG emissions and suspend, revise or rescind the rules if appropriate. On June 19, 2019, the EPA repealed the CPP and replaced it with the ACE rule that established guidelines for states to develop standards of performance to address GHG emissions from existing coal-fired generation. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the ACE rule declaring that the EPA was “arbitrary and capricious” in its rule making and, as such, the ACE rule is no longer in effect and all actions thus far taken by states to implement the federally mandated rule are now null and void. Vacating the ACE rule had the unintended effect of reinstating the CPP because the repeal of the CPP was a provision within the ACE rule. The D.C. Circuit decision was appealed by several states and interested parties, including West Virginia, arguing that the EPA did not have the authorization under Section 111(d) of the CAA to require “generation shifting” as a way to limit GHGs. On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency held that the method the EPA used to regulate GHGs (generation shifting) under Section 111(d) of the CAA (the CPP) was not authorized by Congress and remanded the rule to the EPA for further reconsideration. In response, on May 23, 2023, the EPA published a proposed rule pursuant to CAA Section 111 (b) and (d) in line with the decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency intended to reduce power sector GHG emissions (primarily CO2 emissions) from fossil fuel based EGUs. The rule proposes stringent emissions limitations based on fuel type and unit retirement date. Comments on the proposed rule were submitted to the EPA on August 8, 2023. Depending on how final rules are ultimately implemented and the outcome of any appeals, compliance with these standards could require additional capital expenditures or changes in operation at the Ft. Martin and Harrison power stations.
Clean Water Act
Various water quality regulations, the majority of which are the result of the federal Clean Water Act and its amendments, apply to FirstEnergy’s facilities. In addition, the states in which FirstEnergy operates have water quality standards applicable to FirstEnergy’s operations.
On September 30, 2015, the EPA finalized new, more stringent effluent limits for the Steam Electric Power Generating category (40 CFR Part 423) for arsenic, mercury, selenium and nitrogen for wastewater from wet scrubber systems and zero discharge of pollutants in ash transport water. The treatment obligations were to phase-in as permits are renewed on a five-year cycle from 2018 to 2023. However, on April 13, 2017, the EPA granted a Petition for Reconsideration and on September 18, 2017, the EPA postponed certain compliance deadlines for two years. On August 31, 2020, the EPA issued a final rule revising the effluent limits for discharges from wet scrubber systems, retaining the zero-discharge standard for ash transport water, (with some limited discharge allowances), and extending the deadline for compliance to December 31, 2025 for both. In addition, the EPA allows for less stringent limits for sub-categories of generating units based on capacity utilization, flow volume from the scrubber system, and unit retirement date. On March 29, 2023, the EPA published proposed revised ELGs applicable to coal-fired power plants that include more stringent effluent limitations for wet scrubber systems and ash transport water, and new limits on landfill leachate. Public hearings on the proposed rules were held in April 2023 and comments were accepted through May 30, 2023. In
the interim, the rule issued on August 31, 2020, remains in effect. Depending on the outcome of appeals and how final revised rules are ultimately implemented, compliance with these standards could require additional capital expenditures or changes in operation at the Ft. Martin and Harrison power stations from what was approved by the WVPSC in September 2022 to comply with the 2020 ELG rule.
Regulation of Waste Disposal
Federal and state hazardous waste regulations have been promulgated as a result of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, and the Toxic Substances Control Act. Certain CCRs, such as coal ash, were exempted from hazardous waste disposal requirements pending the EPA’s evaluation of the need for future regulation.
In April 2015, the EPA finalized regulations for the disposal of CCRs (non-hazardous), establishing national standards for landfill design, structural integrity design and assessment criteria for surface impoundments, groundwater monitoring and protection procedures and other operational and reporting procedures to assure the safe disposal of CCRs from electric generating plants. On September 13, 2017, the EPA announced that it would reconsider certain provisions of the final regulations. On July 29, 2020, the EPA published a final rule again revising the date that certain CCR impoundments must cease accepting waste and initiate closure to April 11, 2021. The final rule allowed for an extension of the closure deadline based on meeting identified site-specific criteria. On November 30, 2020, AE Supply submitted a closure deadline extension request to the EPA seeking to extend the cease accepting waste date for the McElroy's Run CCR impoundment facility through the end of the first quarter of 2024, which request is pending technical review by the EPA. AE Supply continues to operate McElroy’s Run as a disposal facility for Pleasants Power Station, which is owned and operated by a non-affiliate.
FE or its subsidiaries have been named as potentially responsible parties at waste disposal sites, which may require cleanup under the CERCLA. Allegations of disposal of hazardous substances at historical sites and the liability involved are often unsubstantiated and subject to dispute; however, federal law provides that all potentially responsible parties for a particular site may be liable on a joint and several basis. Environmental liabilities that are considered probable have been recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2023, based on estimates of the total costs of cleanup, FirstEnergy’s proportionate responsibility for such costs and the financial ability of other unaffiliated entities to pay. Total liabilities of approximately $97 million have been accrued through December 31, 2023, of which, approximately $75 million are for environmental remediation of former MGP and gas holder facilities in New Jersey, which are being recovered by JCP&L through a non-bypassable societal benefits charge. FE or its subsidiaries could be found potentially responsible for additional amounts or additional sites, but the loss or range of losses cannot be determined or reasonably estimated at this time.
OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
United States v. Larry Householder, et al.
On July 21, 2020, a complaint and supporting affidavit containing federal criminal allegations were unsealed against the now former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and other individuals and entities allegedly affiliated with Mr. Householder. In March 2023, a jury found Mr. Householder and his co-defendant, Matthew Borges, guilty and in June 2023, the two were sentenced to prison for 20 and 5 years, respectively. Messrs. Householder and Borges have appealed their sentences. Also, on July 21, 2020, and in connection with the DOJ’s investigation, FirstEnergy received subpoenas for records from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District Ohio. FirstEnergy was not aware of the criminal allegations, affidavit or subpoenas before July 21, 2020.
On July 21, 2021, FE entered into a three-year DPA with the U.S. Attorney’s Office that, subject to court proceedings, resolves this matter. Under the DPA, FE has agreed to the filing of a criminal information charging FE with one count of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud. The DPA requires that FirstEnergy, among other obligations: (i) continue to cooperate with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in all matters relating to the conduct described in the DPA and other conduct under investigation by the U.S. government; (ii) pay a criminal monetary penalty totaling $230 million within sixty days, which shall consist of (x) $115 million paid by FE to the United States Treasury and (y) $115 million paid by FE to the ODSA to fund certain assistance programs, as determined by the ODSA, for the benefit of low-income Ohio electric utility customers; (iii) publish a list of all payments made in 2021 to either 501(c)(4) entities or to entities known by FirstEnergy to be operating for the benefit of a public official, either directly or indirectly, and update the same on a quarterly basis during the term of the DPA; (iv) issue a public statement, as dictated in the DPA, regarding FE’s use of 501(c)(4) entities; and (v) continue to implement and review its compliance and ethics program, internal controls, policies and procedures designed, implemented and enforced to prevent and detect violations of the U.S. laws throughout its operations, and to take certain related remedial measures. The $230 million payment will neither be recovered in rates or charged to FirstEnergy customers nor will FirstEnergy seek any tax deduction related to such payment. The entire amount of the monetary penalty was recognized as expense in the second quarter of 2021 and paid in the third quarter of 2021. Under the terms of the DPA, the criminal information will be dismissed after FirstEnergy fully complies with its obligations under the DPA.
Legal Proceedings Relating to United States v. Larry Householder, et al.
On August 10, 2020, the SEC, through its Division of Enforcement, issued an order directing an investigation of possible securities laws violations by FE, and on September 1, 2020, issued subpoenas to FE and certain FE officers. On April 28, 2021, July 11, 2022, and May 25, 2023, the SEC issued additional subpoenas to FE, with which FE has complied. While no contingency has been reflected in its consolidated financial statements, FE believes that it is probable that it will incur a loss in connection with the resolution of the SEC investigation. Given the ongoing nature and complexity of the review, inquiries and investigations, FE cannot yet reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss that may arise from the resolution of the SEC investigation.
On June 29, 2023, the OOCIC served FE a subpoena, seeking information relating to the conduct described in the DPA. FirstEnergy was not aware of the OOCIC’s investigation prior to receiving the subpoena and understands that the OOCIC’s investigation is also focused on the conduct described in the DPA. FirstEnergy is cooperating with the OOCIC in its investigation. On February 12, 2024, and in connection with the OOCIC’s ongoing investigation, an indictment by a grand jury of Summit County, Ohio was unsealed against the former chairman of the PUCO, Samuel Randazzo, and two former FirstEnergy senior officers, Charles E. Jones, and Michael J. Dowling, charging each of them with several felony counts, including bribery, telecommunications fraud, money laundering and aggravated theft, related to payments described in the DPA. No contingency has been reflected in FirstEnergy’s consolidated financial statements, as a loss is neither probable, nor is a loss or range of loss reasonably estimable.
In addition to the subpoenas referenced above under “—United States v. Larry Householder, et. al.” and the SEC investigation, certain FE stockholders and FirstEnergy customers filed several lawsuits against FirstEnergy and certain current and former directors, officers and other employees, and the complaints in each of these suits is related to allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavit relating to HB 6 and the now former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and other individuals and entities allegedly affiliated with Mr. Householder. The plaintiffs in each of the below cases seek, among other things, to recover an unspecified amount of damages (unless otherwise noted). Unless otherwise indicated, no contingency has been reflected in FirstEnergy’s consolidated financial statements with respect to these lawsuits as a loss is neither probable, nor is a loss or range of a loss reasonably estimable.
•In re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation (S.D. Ohio); on July 28, 2020 and August 21, 2020, purported stockholders of FE filed putative class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Those actions have been consolidated and a lead plaintiff, the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association, has been appointed by the court. A consolidated complaint was filed on February 26, 2021. The consolidated complaint alleges, on behalf of a proposed class of persons who purchased FE securities between February 21, 2017 and July 21, 2020, that FE and certain current or former FE officers violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by issuing misrepresentations or omissions concerning FE’s business and results of operations. The consolidated complaint also alleges that FE, certain current or former FE officers and directors, and a group of underwriters violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as a result of alleged misrepresentations or omissions in connection with offerings of senior notes by FE in February and June 2020. On March 30, 2023, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On April 14, 2023, FE filed a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit seeking to appeal that order, which the Sixth Circuit granted on November 16, 2023. On November 30, 2023, FE filed a motion with the S.D. Ohio to stay all proceedings pending the circuit court appeal. All discovery is stayed during the pendency of the district court motion. FE believes that it is probable that it will incur a loss in connection with the resolution of this lawsuit. Given the ongoing nature and complexity of such litigation, FE cannot yet reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss.
•MFS Series Trust I, et al. v. FirstEnergy Corp., et al. and Brighthouse Funds II – MFS Value Portfolio, et al. v. FirstEnergy Corp., et al. (S.D. Ohio) on December 17, 2021 and February 21, 2022, purported stockholders of FE filed complaints against FE, certain current and former officers, and certain current and former officers of EH. The complaints allege that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by issuing alleged misrepresentations or omissions regarding FE’s business and its results of operations, and seek the same relief as the In re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation described above. All discovery is stayed during the pendency of the district court motion in In re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation described above. FE believes that it is probable that it will incur losses in connection with the resolution of these lawsuits. Given the ongoing nature and complexity of such litigation, FE cannot yet reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss.
•State of Ohio ex rel. Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General v. FirstEnergy Corp., et al. and City of Cincinnati and City of Columbus v. FirstEnergy Corp. (Common Pleas Court, Franklin County, OH, all actions have been consolidated); on September 23, 2020 and October 27, 2020, the OAG and the cities of Cincinnati and Columbus, respectively, filed complaints against several parties including FE, each alleging civil violations of the Ohio Corrupt Activity Act and related claims in connection with the passage of HB 6. On January 13, 2021, the OAG filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against FirstEnergy seeking to enjoin FirstEnergy from collecting the Ohio Companies' decoupling rider. On January 31, 2021, FE reached a partial settlement with the OAG and the cities of Cincinnati and Columbus with respect to the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction request and related issues. In connection with the partial settlement, the Ohio Companies filed an application on February 1, 2021, with the PUCO to set their respective decoupling riders (Conservation Support Rider) to zero. On February 2, 2021, the PUCO approved the application of the Ohio Companies setting the rider to zero, and no additional customer bills will include new decoupling rider charges after February 8, 2021. On August 13, 2021, new defendants were added to the complaint, including two former officers of FirstEnergy. On December 2, 2021, the cities and FE entered a stipulated dismissal with
prejudice of the cities’ suit. After a stay, pending final resolution of the United States v. Larry Householder, et al. criminal proceeding described above, the litigation has resumed pursuant to an order, dated March 15, 2023. Discovery is ongoing. On July 31, 2023, FE and other defendants filed motions to dismiss in part the OAG’s section amended complaint, which the OAG opposed.
On February 9, 2022, FE, acting through the SLC, agreed to a settlement term sheet to resolve the following shareholder derivative lawsuits relating to HB 6 and the now former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and other individuals and entities allegedly affiliated with Mr. Householder that were filed in the S.D. Ohio, the N.D. Ohio, and the Ohio Court of Common Pleas, Summit County:
•Gendrich v. Anderson, et al. and Sloan v. Anderson, et al. (Common Pleas Court, Summit County, Ohio, all actions have been consolidated); on July 26, 2020 and July 31, 2020, respectively, purported stockholders of FE filed shareholder derivative action lawsuits against certain current and former FE directors and officers, alleging, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duty.
•Miller v. Anderson, et al. (N.D. Ohio); Bloom, et al. v. Anderson, et al.; Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones, et al.; Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. v. Anderson et al.; Massachusetts Laborers Pension Fund v. Anderson et al.; The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement v. Anderson et al.; Atherton v. Dowling et al.; Behar v. Anderson, et al. (S.D. Ohio, all actions have been consolidated); beginning on August 7, 2020, purported stockholders of FE filed shareholder derivative actions alleging the FE Board and officers breached their fiduciary duties and committed violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
On March 11, 2022, the parties executed a stipulation and agreement of settlement, and filed a motion the same day requesting preliminary settlement approval in the S.D. Ohio, which the S.D. Ohio granted on May 9, 2022. Subsequently, following a hearing on August 4, 2022, the S.D. Ohio granted final approval of the settlement on August 23, 2022.
The settlement includes a series of corporate governance enhancements and a payment to FE of $180 million, to be paid by insurance after the judgment has become final, less approximately $36 million in court-ordered attorney’s fees awarded to plaintiffs. On September 20, 2022, a purported FE stockholder filed a motion for reconsideration of the S.D. Ohio’s final settlement approval. The parties filed oppositions to that motion on October 11, 2022, and the S.D. Ohio denied that motion on May 22, 2023. On June 15, 2023, the purported FE stockholder filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. If the S.D. Ohio’s final settlement approval is affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the settlement agreement is expected to resolve fully these shareholder derivative lawsuits.
On June 2, 2022, the N.D. Ohio entered an order to show cause why the court should not appoint new plaintiffs’ counsel, and thereafter, on June 10, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the matter without prejudice, which the N.D. Ohio denied on July 5, 2022. On August 15, 2022, the N.D. Ohio issued an order stating its intention to appoint one group of applicants as new plaintiffs’ counsel, and on August 22, 2022, the N.D. Ohio ordered that any objections to the appointment be submitted by August 26, 2022. The parties filed their objections by that deadline, and on September 2, 2022, the applicants responded to those objections. In the meantime, on August 25, 2022, a purported FE stockholder represented by the applicants filed a motion to intervene, attaching a proposed complaint-in-intervention purporting to assert claims that the FE Board and officers breached their fiduciary duties and committed violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act as well as a claim against a third party for professional negligence and malpractice. The parties filed oppositions to that motion to intervene on September 8, 2022, and the proposed intervenor's reply in support of his motion to intervene was filed on September 22, 2022. On August 24, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the action pending in the N.D. Ohio based upon and in light of the approval of the settlement by the S.D. Ohio. On August 30, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the state court action, which the court granted on September 2, 2022. On September 29, 2023, the N.D. Ohio issued a stay of the case pending the appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
In letters dated January 26, and February 22, 2021, staff of FERC's Division of Investigations notified FirstEnergy that the Division was conducting an investigation of FirstEnergy’s lobbying and governmental affairs activities concerning HB 6, and staff directed FirstEnergy to preserve and maintain all documents and information related to the same as such have been developed as part of an ongoing non-public audit being conducted by FERC's Division of Audits and Accounting. On December 30, 2022, FERC approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement that resolves the investigation. The agreement includes a FirstEnergy admission of violating FERC’s “duty of candor” rule and related laws, and obligates FirstEnergy to pay a civil penalty of $3.86 million, and to submit two annual compliance monitoring reports to FERC’s Office of Enforcement regarding improvements to FirstEnergy’s compliance programs. FE paid the civil penalty on January 4, 2023 and it will not be recovered from customers. The first annual compliance monitoring report was submitted in December 2023.
The outcome of any of these lawsuits, governmental investigations and audit is uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on FE’s or its subsidiaries’ reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and cash flows.
Other Legal Matters
There are various lawsuits, claims (including claims for asbestos exposure) and proceedings related to FirstEnergy’s normal business operations pending against FE or its subsidiaries. The loss or range of loss in these matters is not expected to be material to FE or its subsidiaries. The other potentially material items not otherwise discussed above are described under Note 13, “Regulatory Matters.”
FirstEnergy accrues legal liabilities only when it concludes that it is probable that it has an obligation for such costs and can reasonably estimate the amount of such costs. In cases where FirstEnergy determines that it is not probable, but reasonably possible that it has a material obligation, it discloses such obligations and the possible loss or range of loss if such estimate can be made. If it were ultimately determined that FE or its subsidiaries have legal liability or are otherwise made subject to liability based on any of the matters referenced above, it could have a material adverse effect on FE’s or its subsidiaries’ financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
FE and its subsidiaries are principally involved in the transmission, distribution and generation of electricity through its reportable segments, Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission. FirstEnergy evaluates segment performance based on earnings attributable to FE from continuing operations.
The Regulated Distribution segment distributes electricity through FirstEnergy’s utility operating companies, serving approximately six million customers within 65,000 square miles of Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey and New York, and purchases power for its POLR, SOS, SSO and default service requirements in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland. This segment also controls 3,580 MWs of regulated electric generation capacity located primarily in West Virginia and Virginia. The segment's results reflect the costs of securing and delivering electric generation from transmission facilities to customers, including the deferral and amortization of certain related costs.
The Regulated Transmission segment provides transmission infrastructure owned and operated by the Transmission Companies and certain of FirstEnergy's utilities (JCP&L, MP, PE and WP) to transmit electricity from generation sources to distribution facilities. The segment's revenues are derived from primarily forward-looking formula rates, pursuant to which the revenue requirement is updated annually based on a projected rate base and projected costs, which is subject to an annual true-up based on actual rate base and costs. The segment's results also reflect the net transmission expenses related to the delivery of electricity on FirstEnergy's transmission facilities. KATCo, which was a subsidiary of FET, became a wholly owned subsidiary of FE prior to the closing of the FET P&SA I and remains in the Regulated Transmission segment.
On February 2, 2023, FE, along with FET, entered into the FET P&SA II with Brookfield and the Brookfield Guarantors, pursuant to which FE agreed to sell to Brookfield at the closing, and Brookfield agreed to purchase from FE, an incremental 30% equity interest in FET for a purchase price of $3.5 billion. The majority of the purchase price is expected to be paid in cash upon closing, and the remainder will be payable by the issuance of a promissory note, which is expected to be repaid by the end of 2024. As a result of the consummation of the transaction, Brookfield’s interest in FET will increase from 19.9% to 49.9%, while FE will retain the remaining 50.1% ownership interests of FET. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval from the PPUC. In addition, pursuant to the FET P&SA II, FirstEnergy made the necessary filings with the applicable regulatory authorities for the PA Consolidation. The FET Minority Equity Interest Sale is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2024. Upon closing, FET will continue to be consolidated in FirstEnergy’s financial statements.
Corporate/Other reflects corporate support and other costs not charged or attributable to the Utilities or Transmission Companies, including FE's retained Pension and OPEB assets and liabilities of former subsidiaries, interest expense on FE’s holding company debt and other investments or businesses that do not constitute an operating segment, including FEV's investment of 33-1/3% equity ownership in Global Holding. Reconciling adjustments for the elimination of inter-segment transactions are shown separately in the following table of Segment Financial Information. As of December 31, 2023, 67 MWs of electric generating capacity, representing AE Supply's OVEC capacity entitlement, was also included in Corporate/Other for segment reporting. As of December 31, 2023, Corporate/Other had approximately $7.1 billion of external FE holding company debt.
2024 Segment Changes
Beginning in 2024, FirstEnergy changed its reportable segments to include Distribution, which will consist of the Ohio Companies and FE PA; Integrated, which will consist of MP, PE and JCP&L; and Stand-Alone Transmission, which will consist of FE's ownership in FET and KATCo. On January 1, 2024, WP transferred certain of its Pennsylvania-based transmission assets to KATCo. Corporate/Other will reflect corporate support and other support costs not charged or attributable to the Utilities or Transmission Companies, including FE's retained Pension and OPEB assets and liabilities of former subsidiaries, interest expense on FE's holding company debt and other investments or businesses that do not constitute an operating segment, including FEV's investment of 33-1/3% equity ownership in Global Holding.
Financial information for FirstEnergy’s business segments and reconciliations to consolidated amounts is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | |
External revenues | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 10,810 | | | $ | 10,569 | | | $ | 9,510 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 2,049 | | | 1,863 | | | 1,608 | |
Corporate/Other | | 11 | | | 27 | | | 14 | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total external revenues | | $ | 12,870 | | | $ | 12,459 | | | $ | 11,132 | |
| | | | | | |
Internal revenues | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 228 | | | $ | 232 | | | $ | 201 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 5 | | | 5 | | | 10 | |
Corporate/Other | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | (233) | | | (237) | | | (211) | |
Total internal revenues | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 12,870 | | | $ | 12,459 | | | $ | 11,132 | |
| | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 1,021 | | | $ | 967 | | | $ | 911 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 367 | | | 335 | | | 325 | |
Corporate/Other | | 4 | | | 7 | | | 3 | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | 69 | | | 66 | | | 63 | |
Total depreciation | | $ | 1,461 | | | $ | 1,375 | | | $ | 1,302 | |
| | | | | | |
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | (256) | | | $ | (362) | | | $ | 260 | |
Regulated Transmission | | (5) | | | (3) | | | 9 | |
Corporate/Other | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | | $ | (261) | | | $ | (365) | | | $ | 269 | |
| | | | | | |
DPA penalty | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Corporate/Other | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 230 | |
| | | | | | |
Total DPA penalty | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 230 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Equity method investment earnings | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Regulated Transmission | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Corporate/Other | | 175 | | | 168 | | | 31 | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total equity method investment earnings | | $ | 175 | | | $ | 168 | | | $ | 31 | |
| | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 618 | | | $ | 526 | | | $ | 522 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 256 | | | 230 | | | 247 | |
Corporate/Other | | 334 | | | 350 | | | 382 | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | (84) | | | (67) | | | (12) | |
Total interest expense | | $ | 1,124 | | | $ | 1,039 | | | $ | 1,139 | |
| | | | | | |
Income taxes (benefits) | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 167 | | | $ | 251 | | | $ | 364 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 179 | | | 110 | | | 127 | |
Corporate/Other | | (79) | | | 639 | | | (171) | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total income taxes | | $ | 267 | | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 320 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Earnings (losses) attributable to FE from continuing operations | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 740 | | | $ | 957 | | | $ | 1,288 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 514 | | | 361 | | | 408 | |
Corporate/Other | | (131) | | | (912) | | | (457) | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total earnings attributable to FE from continuing operations | | $ | 1,123 | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | 1,239 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | | |
Capital investments | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 1,631 | | | $ | 1,605 | | | $ | 1,437 | |
Regulated Transmission | | 1,610 | | | 1,192 | | | 958 | |
Corporate/Other | | 115 | | | 51 | | | 92 | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total capital investments | | $ | 3,356 | | | $ | 2,848 | | | $ | 2,487 | |
| | As of December 31, | | |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | |
| | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 32,929 | | | $ | 31,749 | | | |
Regulated Transmission | | 15,155 | | | 13,835 | | | |
Corporate/Other | | 683 | | | 524 | | | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 48,767 | | | $ | 46,108 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | | | | |
Regulated Distribution | | $ | 5,004 | | | $ | 5,004 | | | |
Regulated Transmission | | 614 | | | 614 | | | |
Corporate/Other | | — | | | — | | | |
Reconciling Adjustments | | — | | | — | | | |
Total goodwill | | $ | 5,618 | | | $ | 5,618 | | | |
16. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On March 31, 2018, the FES Debtors announced that, in order to facilitate an orderly financial restructuring, they filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court. On February 27, 2020, the FES Debtors effectuated their plan, emerged from bankruptcy and FirstEnergy tendered the Bankruptcy Court approved settlement payments totaling $853 million and a $125 million tax sharing payment to the FES Debtors. The settlement was conditioned on the FES Debtors confirming and effectuating a plan of reorganization acceptable to FirstEnergy.
By eliminating a significant portion of its competitive generation fleet with the deconsolidation of the FES Debtors, FirstEnergy has concluded the FES Debtors meet the criteria for discontinued operations, as this represents a significant event in management’s strategic review to exit commodity-exposed generation and transition to a fully regulated company.
Income Taxes
As a result of the FES Debtors’ tax return deconsolidation, FirstEnergy recognized a worthless stock deduction, of approximately $4.9 billion, net of unrecognized tax benefits of $316 million, for the remaining tax basis in the stock of the FES Debtors. Based upon completion of the IRS’s review of the 2020 federal income tax return during fourth quarter 2021, FirstEnergy recognized the full tax benefit of the worthless stock deduction of approximately $5.2 billion, or $1.1 billion on a tax-effected basis, net of valuation allowances recorded against the state tax benefit ($21 million), eliminating associated uncertain tax position reserves.
Upon emergence, FirstEnergy paid the FES Debtors $125 million to settle all reconciliations under the Intercompany Tax Allocation Agreement for 2018, 2019 and 2020 tax years, including all issues regarding nondeductible interest.
In conjunction with filing the 2020 consolidated federal income tax return during the third quarter of 2021, FirstEnergy computed a final federal NOL allocation between the FES Debtors and FirstEnergy consolidated that resulted in FirstEnergy recording an increase to the consolidated NOL carryforward of approximately $289 million ($61 million tax-effected).
Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations
Summarized results of discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Other expense, net | | — | | | — | | | (4) | |
Loss from discontinued operations, before tax | | — | | | — | | | (4) | |
Income tax benefit | | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | — | | | — | | | (3) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit), including worthless stock deduction | | 21 | | | — | | | (47) | |
Gain (loss) on disposal, net of tax | | (21) | | | — | | | 47 | |
| | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1) | | $ | (21) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 44 | |
(1) Income from discontinued operations is included in Corporate/Other.
On February 27, 2020, the FES Debtors emerged from bankruptcy and were deconsolidated from FirstEnergy’s consolidated federal income tax group. The bankruptcy, emergence and deconsolidation resulted in FirstEnergy recognizing certain income tax benefits and charges, which were classified as discontinued operations. During the third quarter of 2023, FirstEnergy recognized a $21 million tax-effected charge to income tax expense as a result of identifying an out of period adjustment related to the allocation of certain deferred income tax liabilities associated with the FES Debtors and their tax return deconsolidation in 2020. This adjustment was immaterial to the 2023 and prior period financial statements.
FirstEnergy's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows combines cash flows from discontinued operations with cash flows from continuing operations within each cash flow category. The following table summarizes the major classes of cash flow items from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | $ | (21) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 44 | |
Loss (gain) on disposal, net of tax | | 21 | | | — | | | (47) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |