SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-5231
McDONALD'S CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
36-2361282
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
McDonald's Plaza Oak Brook, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) |
|
60523 (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (630) 623-3000 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
---|---|---|
Common stock, $.01 par value |
New York Stock Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange |
|
8- 7 / 8 % Debentures due 2011 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7- 3 / 8 % Debentures due 2033 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7.05% Debentures due 2025 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7.31% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2027 | New York Stock Exchange | |
6- 3 / 8 % Debentures due 2028 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ý No o
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $36,208,412,413 as of June 30, 2002. The number of shares of common stock outstanding was 1,268,809,982 as of January 31, 2003.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the registrant's 2002 definitive proxy statement which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
McDonald's Corporation, the registrant, together with its subsidiaries, is referred to herein as the "Company."
(a) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS
During 2002, there have been no significant changes to the Company's corporate structure or material changes in the Company's method of conducting business.
(b) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS
Segment data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 are included in Part II, Item 8, page 34 of this Form 10-K.
(c) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
The Company operates in the food service industry and primarily operates and franchises quick-service restaurant businesses under the McDonald's brand. These restaurants serve a varied, yet limited, value-priced menu (see Products) in 119 countries around the world.
The Company also operates other restaurant concepts under its Partner Brands: Boston Market, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Donatos Pizzeria, which are all located primarily in the U.S. In addition, the Company has a minority ownership interest in U.K.-based Pret A Manger. In March 2002, the Company sold its Aroma Café business in the U.K.
Since McDonald's restaurant business comprises virtually all of the Company's consolidated operating results, this narrative primarily relates to the McDonald's restaurant business, unless otherwise noted.
All restaurants are operated by the Company or, under the terms of franchise arrangements, by franchisees who are independent entrepreneurs, or by affiliates operating under joint-venture agreements between the Company and local business people.
The Company's operations are designed to assure consistency and high quality at every McDonald's restaurant. When granting franchises and forming joint-venture agreements, the Company is selective and is not in the practice of franchising to, or partnering with, investor groups or passive investors.
Under the conventional franchise arrangement, franchisees provide capital by initially investing in the equipment, signs, seating and décor of their restaurant businesses, and by reinvesting in the business over time. The Company shares the investment by generally owning or leasing the land and building. Franchisees contribute to the Company's revenue stream through payment of rent and service fees based upon a percent of sales, with specified minimum payments, along with initial fees. The conventional franchise arrangement typically lasts 20 years and franchising practices are generally consistent throughout the world. A discussion regarding site selection is included in Part I, Item 2, page 4 of this Form 10-K.
The Company, its franchisees and affiliates purchase food, packaging, equipment, etc., from numerous independent suppliers who have been approved by the Company. The Company has established and strictly enforces high quality standards. The Company has quality assurance labs around the world that work to ensure that our high standards are consistently met. The quality assurance process not only involves ongoing product reviews, but also on-site inspections of suppliers' facilities. Further, there is a Quality Assurance Board, composed of the Company's technical, safety and supply chain specialists, which provides strategic global leadership for all aspects of food quality and safety. In addition, the Company works closely with suppliers to encourage innovation, assure best practices and drive continuous improvement.
Independently owned and operated distribution centers, also approved by the Company, distribute products and supplies to most McDonald's restaurants. In addition, restaurant personnel are trained in the proper storage, handling and preparation of our products and in the delivery of customer service.
McDonald's global brand is well known. Marketing, promotional and public relations activities are designed to nurture McDonald's brand image and differentiate the Company from competitors. Marketing and promotional efforts focus on value, food taste and the customer experience. In addition, the Company is focused on being a leader in the area of social responsibility, as the Company believes it is important to give back to the people and communities around the world who are responsible for our success.
Products
McDonald's restaurants offer a substantially uniform menu. In addition, McDonald's tests new products on an ongoing basis.
McDonald's menu includes hamburgers and cheeseburgers, Big Mac, Quarter Pounder with Cheese, Big N' Tasty, Filet-O-Fish and several chicken sandwiches, Chicken McNuggets, french fries, salads, milk shakes, McFlurry desserts, sundaes and soft serve cones, pies, cookies and soft drinks and other beverages. In addition, the restaurants sell a variety of other products during limited-time promotions.
McDonald's restaurants operating in the U. S. and certain international markets are open during breakfast hours and offer a full- or limited-breakfast menu. Breakfast offerings may include the Egg McMuffin and Sausage McMuffin with Egg sandwiches, hotcakes, biscuit and bagel sandwiches and muffins.
Chipotle serves gourmet burritos and tacos. Donatos sells pizza, submarine sandwiches and salads. Boston Market is a home-meal replacement concept serving chicken, meatloaf and a variety of other main and side dishes. Pret A Manger is a quick-service food concept that serves mainly prepared and packaged cold sandwiches, snacks and drinks during lunchtime.
Intellectual property
The Company owns valuable intellectual property including trademarks, service marks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other proprietary information, some of which, including "McDonald's," "Ronald McDonald," "Big Mac" and other related marks, are of material importance to the Company's business. The Company also has certain patents on restaurant equipment which, while valuable, are not material to its business.
3
Seasonal operations
The Company does not consider its operations to be seasonal to any material degree.
Working capital practices
Information about the Company's working capital practices is incorporated herein by reference to Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 in Part II, Item 7, pages 9 through 22, and the Consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 in Part II, Item 8, page 26 of this Form 10-K.
Customers
The Company's business is not dependent upon a single customer or small group of customers.
Backlog
Company-operated restaurants have no backlog orders.
Government contracts
No material portion of the business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. government.
Competition
McDonald's restaurants compete with international, national, regional and local retailers of food products. The Company competes on the basis of price, convenience and service and by offering quality food products. The Company's competition in the broadest perspective includes restaurants, quick-service eating establishments, pizza parlors, coffee shops, street vendors, convenience food stores, delicatessens and supermarkets.
In the U.S., there were about 526,000 restaurants that generated $320 billion in annual sales in 2002. McDonald's restaurant business accounts for 2.6% of those restaurants and 6.3% of the sales. No reasonable estimate can be made of the number of competitors outside the U.S.
Research and development
The Company operates a research and development facility in Illinois. While research and development activities are important to the Company's business, these expenditures are not material. Independent suppliers also conduct research activities for the benefit of the McDonald's System, which includes franchisees and suppliers, as well as the Company, its subsidiaries and joint ventures.
Environmental matters
The Company is not aware of any federal, state or local environmental laws or regulations that will materially affect its earnings or competitive position, or result in material capital expenditures; however, the Company cannot predict the effect on its operations of possible future environmental legislation or regulations. During 2002, there were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities and no such material expenditures are anticipated.
Number of employees
During 2002, the Company's average number of employees worldwide, including Company-operated restaurant employees, was approximately 413,000. This includes employees at McDonald's Company-operated restaurants as well as other restaurant concepts operated by the Company.
(d) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS
Financial information about foreign and domestic markets is incorporated herein by reference to Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in Part II, Item 7, pages 9 through 22 and Segment and geographic information in Part II, Item 8, page 34 of this Form 10-K.
(e) AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The Company therefore files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Such reports may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site ( http://www.sec.gov ) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
Financial and other information can be accessed on the Investor section of the Company's website at www.mcdonalds.com . The Company makes available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC. Copies of financial and other information are also available free of charge by calling 1-630-623-7428, or by sending a request to McDonald's Corporation Investor Relations Service Center, McDonald's Plaza, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523.
The Company identifies and develops sites that offer convenience to customers and long-term sales and profit potential to the Company. To assess potential, the Company analyzes traffic and walking patterns, census data, school enrollments and other relevant data. The Company's experience and access to advanced technology aid in evaluating this information. The Company generally owns the land and building or secures long-term land and building leases for restaurant sites, which ensures long-term occupancy rights and helps control related costs. Restaurant profitability for both the Company and franchisees is important; therefore, ongoing efforts are made to control average development costs through construction and design efficiencies and standardization and by leveraging the Company's global sourcing network. Additional information about the Company's properties is included in
4
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in Part II, Item 7, pages 9 through 22 and in Financial statements and supplementary data in Part II, Item 8, pages 23 through 39 of this Form 10-K.
The Company has pending a number of lawsuits which have been filed from time to time in various jurisdictions. These lawsuits cover a broad variety of allegations spanning the Company's entire business. The following is a brief description of the more significant of these categories of lawsuits. In addition, the Company is subject to various federal, state and local regulations that impact various aspects of its business, as discussed below. The Company does not believe that any such claims, lawsuits or regulations will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Franchising
A substantial number of McDonald's restaurants are franchised to independent entrepreneurs operating under arrangements with the Company. In the course of the franchise relationship, occasional disputes arise between the Company and its franchisees relating to a broad range of subjects including, but not limited to, quality, service and cleanliness issues, contentions regarding grants or terminations of franchises, franchisee claims for additional franchises or rewrites of franchises, and delinquent payments. Additionally, occasional disputes arise between the Company and individuals who claim they should have been granted a McDonald's franchise.
Suppliers
The Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries do not supply, with minor exceptions outside the U.S., food, paper or related items to any McDonald's restaurants. The Company relies upon numerous independent suppliers that are required to meet and maintain the Company's high standards and specifications. On occasion, disputes arise between the Company and its suppliers on a number of issues including, by way of example, compliance with product specifications and the Company's business relationship with suppliers. In addition, disputes occasionally arise on a number of issues between the Company and individuals or entities who claim that they should be (or should have been) granted the opportunity to supply products or services to the Company's restaurants.
Employees
Thousands of people are employed by the Company and in restaurants owned and operated by subsidiaries of the Company. In addition, thousands of people, from time to time, seek employment in such restaurants. In the ordinary course of business, disputes arise regarding hiring, firing and promotion practices.
Customers
The Company's restaurants serve a large cross-section of the public. In the course of serving so many people, disputes arise as to products, service, accidents, advertising, nutritional and other disclosures as well as other matters typical of an extensive restaurant business such as that of the Company.
Intellectual property
The Company has registered trademarks and service marks, some of which are of material importance to the Company's business. The Company also has certain patents on restaurant equipment which, while valuable, are not material to its business. From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation to defend and protect its use of its intellectual property.
Government regulations
Local, state and federal governments have adopted laws and regulations involving various aspects of the restaurant business, including, but not limited to, franchising, health, safety, environment, zoning and employment. The Company does not believe that it is in violation of any existing statutory or administrative rules, but it cannot predict the effect on its operations from the issuance of additional requirements in the future.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS
None.
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY:
Claire H. Babrowski, 45, is President of McDonald's Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa, a position to which she was appointed in June 2001. From January 2000 to June 2001 she was Executive Vice President, Worldwide Restaurant Systems; from June 1998 to January 2000 she was Executive Vice President, U.S. Restaurant Systems; and from May 1997 to June 1998 she was Senior Vice President, U.S. Restaurant Systems. Ms. Babrowski has been with the Company for 25 years.
Charles H. Bell, 42, is President and Chief Operating Officer, effective January 2003. From June 2001 to December 2002 he was President of McDonald's Europe; from September 1999 to June 2001 he was President of McDonald's Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa; and from 1993 to September 1999 he was Managing Director of McDonald's Australia. Mr. Bell has been with the Company for 27 years.
James R. Cantalupo, 59, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a position to which he was appointed effective January 2003. From January to December 31, 2002 he was Vice Chairman, Emeritus and President, Emeritus. From December 1999 to December 2001 he was Vice Chairman and President. From August 1998 to December 1999 he was Vice Chairman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of McDonald's International. From January 1992 to August 1998 he was President and Chief Executive Officer, McDonald's International. Mr. Cantalupo has been with the Company for 29 years.
5
Mats Lederhausen, 39, is President of the Business Development Group, a position to which he was appointed in January 2003. From July 2001 to January 2003 he served as Executive Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development; from December 2000 to July 2001 he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy; and from April 1999 to July 2000 he served as Vice President. Before joining McDonald's corporate staff, Mr. Lederhausen was Managing Director and Joint-Venture Partner for Svenska McDonald's Development AB, a subsidiary of the Company. He is no longer Managing Director and Joint-Venture Partner of that subsidiary. Mr. Lederhausen has been with the McDonald's System for 18 years.
M. Lawrence Light, 61, is Corporate Executive Vice PresidentGlobal Chief Marketing Officer. He has served in that position since joining the Company in September 2002. Prior to joining McDonald's, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Arcature, a brand consultancy. Mr. Light has been with the Company for less than one year.
Matthew H. Paull, 51, is Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position to which he was elected in July 2001. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Tax and Finance from December 2000 to July 2001; Senior Vice President from January 2000 to December 2000; and Vice President from June 1993 to January 2000. Mr. Paull has been with the Company for 9 years.
David M. Pojman, 43, is Corporate Senior Vice PresidentController, a position he has held since March 2002. Previously, he served as Vice President and Assistant Corporate Controller from January 2000 to March 2002; and from July 1997 to January 2000 he served as Vice PresidentInternational Controller. Mr. Pojman has been with the Company for 20 years.
Michael J. Roberts, 52, is PresidentMcDonald's USA, a position he has held since June 2001. From July 1997 to June 2001 he was President, West Division. Mr. Roberts has been with the Company for 25 years.
Eduardo Sanchez, 45, is PresidentLatin America and Canada Group, a position to which he was appointed in January 2003. Previously, he was President of the Latin America Group from May 1999 to January 2003; and International Relationship Partner for Latin America from November 1995 to May 1999. Mr. Sanchez has been with the Company for 26 years.
Gloria Santona, 52, is Corporate Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, a position she has held since June 2001. From December 2000 to June 2001 she was Vice President, U.S. General Counsel and Secretary; and from March 1997 to December 2000 she was Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary. Ms. Santona has been with the Company for 25 years.
James A. Skinner, 58, is Vice Chairman. Mr. Skinner was appointed to his current position effective January 2003. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald's Worldwide Restaurant Group from February 2002 to December 2002. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald's Europe, Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa from June 2001 to February 2002; and President of McDonald's Europe from December 1997 to June 2001. Mr. Skinner has been with the Company for 32 years.
Russell P. Smyth, 46, is PresidentMcDonald's Europe, a position to which he was appointed in January 2003. Previously, he served as President of Partner Brands from December 2001 to January 2003; International Relationship Partner for Southeast and Central Asia from May 1999 to December 2001; and Vice President of the Latin America Group from July 1996 to May 1999. Mr. Smyth has been with the Company for 19 years.
Stanley R. Stein, 60, is Executive Vice President, Corporate Human Resources, a position he has held since July 1997. Prior to that time, Mr. Stein served as Senior Vice President. Mr. Stein has been with the Company for 28 years.
Item 5A. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock trades under the symbol MCD and is listed on the New York and Chicago stock exchanges in the U.S.
The following table sets forth the common stock price ranges on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape and dividends declared per common share.
The approximate number of shareholders of record and beneficial owners of the Company's common stock as of January 31, 2003 was estimated to be 1,032,000.
Given the Company's returns on equity and assets, management believes it is prudent to reinvest a significant portion of earnings back into the business and use excess cash flow for debt repayments and share repurchases. Accordingly, the common stock dividend yield is modest. The Company has paid dividends on common stock for 27 consecutive years through 2002 and has increased the dividend amount at least once every year. Additional dividend increases will be considered after reviewing returns to shareholders, profitability expectations, financing needs and tax treatment of dividends. Dividends are declared and paid on an annual basis. As in the past, future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.
6
Item 5B. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002. All outstanding awards relate to our common stock. Shares awarded under all of the following plans may be from the Company's treasury or may be otherwise acquired in the open market.
Plan category
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 129,653,669 | $ | 24.74 | 33,044,007 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2) | 69,205,034 | $ | 32.87 | 200,000 | |||
|
|
|
|||||
Total | 198,858,703 | $ | 27.57 | 33,244,007 | |||
|
|
|
2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan. 29,673,065 shares
1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan. no shares
1975 Stock Ownership Option Plan. 3,370,942 shares
Directors' Stock Plan. The Plan provides an opportunity for outside directors and senior directors to defer some or all of their annual retainers and Board and Committee meeting fees. In addition, each director receives a credit of $17,500 to his or her plan account at the end of each full year of service, up to a maximum of 10 years. Each director's plan account is credited with a number of shares as though the deferred amounts had been invested in the Company's common stock, and the number of shares is adjusted for dividends paid on the Company's common stock. Upon retirement, or a date specified by the director, the director receives cash payments based on the value of the shares credited to the director's account, in a lump sum or, if the director elects, in installments for a period of up to 15 years. A director may elect to receive payment in the form of shares of common stock.
1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. The Plan provided for the granting of stock options to non-employee directors. There were initial stock option grants of 5,000 shares to directors when they joined the board; and an annual stock option grant of 5,000 shares as of the date the director was elected or re-elected at the Company's annual meeting of shareholders. Options have a ten-year term and become exercisable in increments of 33% on the first, second and third anniversary dates of the grant. No future grants will be made under this plan.
The Deferred Income Plan, now part of the Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, was adopted to enable participants to defer receipt of all or any portion of their incentive payments and up to 90% of their base pay. Payments under this plan may be in cash or shares. There are 200,000 shares in this plan.
Of the 69,205,034 shares to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, 69,011,034 shares were added to the 1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan and the 1975 Stock Ownership Option Plan without security holder approval.
7
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
11-YEAR SUMMARY
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
1998
|
1997
|
1996
|
1995
|
1994
|
1993
|
1992
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenues | $ | 15,406 | 14,870 | 14,243 | 13,259 | 12,421 | 11,409 | 10,687 | 9,795 | 8,321 | 7,408 | 7,133 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 2,113 | (1) | 2,697 | (2) | 3,330 | 3,320 | 2,762 | (3) | 2,808 | 2,633 | 2,601 | 2,241 | 1,984 | 1,862 | |||||||||
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1,662 | (1) | 2,330 | (4) | 2,882 | 2,884 | 2,307 | (3) | 2,407 | 2,251 | 2,169 | 1,887 | 1,676 | 1,448 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 893 | (1,5) | 1,637 | (4) | 1,977 | 1,948 | 1,550 | (3) | 1,642 | 1,573 | 1,427 | 1,224 | 1,083 | 959 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Cash provided by operations | $ | 2,890 | 2,688 | 2,751 | 3,009 | 2,766 | 2,442 | 2,461 | 2,296 | 1,926 | 1,680 | 1,426 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 2,004 | 1,906 | 1,945 | 1,868 | 1,879 | 2,111 | 2,375 | 2,064 | 1,539 | 1,317 | 1,087 | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | $ | 687 | 1,090 | 2,002 | 933 | 1,162 | 765 | 605 | 321 | 500 | 628 | 92 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Financial position at year end: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,971 | 22,535 | 21,684 | 20,983 | 19,784 | 18,242 | 17,386 | 15,415 | 13,592 | 12,035 | 11,681 | ||||||||||||
Total debt | $ | 9,979 | 8,918 | 8,474 | 7,252 | 7,043 | 6,463 | 5,523 | 4,836 | 4,351 | 3,713 | 3,857 | ||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | $ | 10,281 | 9,488 | 9,204 | 9,639 | 9,465 | 8,852 | 8,718 | 7,861 | 6,885 | 6,274 | 5,892 | ||||||||||||
Shares outstanding
IN MILLIONS |
1,268 | 1,281 | 1,305 | 1,351 | 1,356 | 1,371 | 1,389 | 1,400 | 1,387 | 1,415 | 1,454 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net incomebasic(5) | $ | .70 | (1) | 1.27 | (4) | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.14 | (3) | 1.17 | 1.11 | .99 | .84 | .73 | .65 | |||||||||
Net incomediluted(5) | $ | .70 | (1) | 1.25 | (4) | 1.46 | 1.39 | 1.10 | (3) | 1.15 | 1.08 | .97 | .82 | .71 | .63 | |||||||||
Dividends declared | $ | .24 | .23 | .22 | .20 | .18 | .16 | .15 | .13 | .12 | .11 | .10 | ||||||||||||
Market price at year end | $ | 16.08 | 26.47 | 34.00 | 40.31 | 38.41 | 23.88 | 22.69 | 22.56 | 14.63 | 14.25 | 12.19 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Franchised sales | $ | 25,692 | 24,838 | 24,463 | 23,830 | 22,330 | 20,863 | 19,969 | 19,123 | 17,146 | 15,756 | 14,474 | ||||||||||||
Company-operated sales | $ | 11,500 | 11,040 | 10,467 | 9,512 | 8,895 | 8,136 | 7,571 | 6,863 | 5,793 | 5,157 | 5,103 | ||||||||||||
Affiliated sales | $ | 4,334 | 4,752 | 5,251 | 5,149 | 4,754 | 4,639 | 4,272 | 3,928 | 3,048 | 2,674 | 2,308 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Total Systemwide sales(6) | $ | 41,526 | 40,630 | 40,181 | 38,491 | 35,979 | 33,638 | 31,812 | 29,914 | 25,987 | 23,587 | 21,885 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Franchised restaurants | 17,864 | 17,395 | 16,795 | 15,949 | 15,086 | 14,197 | 13,374 | 12,186 | 10,944 | 9,918 | 9,237 | |||||||||||||
Company-operated restaurants | 9,000 | 8,378 | 7,652 | 6,059 | 5,433 | 4,887 | 4,294 | 3,783 | 3,216 | 2,733 | 2,551 | |||||||||||||
Affiliated restaurants | 4,244 | 4,320 | 4,260 | 4,301 | 3,994 | 3,844 | 3,216 | 2,330 | 1,739 | 1,476 | 1,305 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Total Systemwide restaurants(7) | 31,108 | 30,093 | 28,707 | 26,309 | 24,513 | 22,928 | 20,884 | 18,299 | 15,899 | 14,127 | 13,093 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Company operates in the food service industry and primarily operates and franchises quick-service restaurant businesses under the McDonald's brand (McDonald's restaurants). Approximately 80% of McDonald's restaurants and about 75% of the total revenues of McDonald's restaurants are in nine markets: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan (a 50%-owned affiliate accounted for under the equity method), the United Kingdom and the United States. Throughout this discussion, McDonald's restaurant businesses in these nine markets collectively are referred to as "major markets."
The Company also operates other restaurant concepts under its Partner Brands: Boston Market, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Donatos Pizzeria. In addition, the Company has a minority ownership in Pret A Manger. In March 2002, the Company sold its Aroma Café business in the U.K.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
Operating results
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
Amount
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||
Sales by Company-operated restaurants | $ | 11,500 | 4 | % | $ | 11,041 | 5 | % | $ | 10,467 | |||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | 3,906 | 2 | 3,829 | 1 | 3,776 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenues | 15,406 | 4 | 14,870 | 4 | 14,243 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses | |||||||||||||||
Company-operated restaurants | 9,907 | 5 | 9,454 | 8 | 8,750 | ||||||||||
Franchised restaurants | 840 | 5 | 800 | 4 | 772 | ||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses | 1,713 | 3 | 1,662 | 5 | 1,587 | ||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | 833 | nm | 257 | nm | (196 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 13,293 | 9 | 12,173 | 12 | 10,913 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating income | 2,113 | (22 | ) | 2,697 | (19 | ) | 3,330 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Interest expense | 374 | (17 | ) | 452 | 5 | 430 | |||||||||
McDonald's Japan IPO gain | nm | (137 | ) | nm | |||||||||||
Nonoperating expense, net | 77 | 48 | 52 | nm | 18 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | 1,662 | (29 | ) | 2,330 | (19 | ) | 2,882 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 670 | (3 | ) | 693 | (23 | ) | 905 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | 992 | (39 | ) | 1,637 | (17 | ) | 1,977 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (99 | ) | nm | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income | $ | 893 | (45 | )% | $ | 1,637 | (17 | )% | $ | 1,977 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Per common sharediluted: | |||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | .77 | (38 | )% | $ | 1.25 | (14 | )% | $ | 1.46 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.07 | ) | nm | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income | $ | .70 | (44 | )% | $ | 1.25 | (14 | )% | $ | 1.46 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
STRATEGIC ACTIONS
In 2002, the Company initiated several strategic actions designed to optimize existing restaurant operations and improve the business. These actions were consistent with management's strategy of concentrating its capital and resources on the best near-term opportunities and of avoiding those that distract from restaurant-level execution. They included the restructuring of certain markets, the closing of a significant number of underperforming restaurants, the decision to terminate a long-term technology project, and the consolidation of certain home office facilities and elimination of positions to control costs, streamline operations and reallocate resources.
In 2001, the Company implemented strategic changes and restaurant initiatives in the U.S. and certain international markets. The changes in the U.S. included streamlining operations by reducing the number of regions and divisions, enabling the Company to combine staff functions and improve efficiency.
The Company recorded charges and/or gains associated with these actions in 2002 and 2001 as "significant items." Significant items generally represent charges and/or gains for actions or transactions related to the implementation of special initiatives of the Company or items that are unusual or infrequent in nature. The Company does not include these items when reviewing business performance trends,
9
because management does not believe these are indicative of ongoing operations.
The Company recorded $853 million of significant items in 2002 and $253 million of significant items in 2001. All significant items for both years were recorded in other operating expense, except as noted in the discussion that follows.
Significant itemsexpense/(income)
|
|
|
|
|
Per common
sharediluted |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pretax
|
After tax
|
|||||||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | $ | 267 | $ | 200 | $ | 244 | $ | 136 | $ | .19 | $ | .11 | |||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 402 | 135 | 336 | 107 | .26 | .08 | |||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 184 | 55 | 120 | 37 | .10 | .03 | |||||||||||||
McDonald's Japan IPO gain | (137 | ) | (137 | ) | (.11 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Total significant items(1) | $ | 853 | $ | 253 | $ | 700 | $ | 143 | $ | .55 | $ | .11 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring chargesrestructuring markets and eliminating positions
In 2002, the Company recorded $267 million of pretax charges related to transferring ownership in four countries in the Middle East and Latin America to developmental licensees (approximately 150 restaurants), ceasing operations in three countries in Latin America (approximately 20 restaurants), and eliminating positions (approximately 600 positions, about half of which were in the U.S. and half of which were in international markets), reallocating resources and consolidating certain home office facilities to control costs. Under the developmental license business structure, which the Company successfully employs in more than 25 markets outside the U.S. (approximately 350 restaurants), the licensee owns the business, including the real estate interest. While the Company generally does not have any capital invested in these markets, it receives a royalty based on a percent of sales.
The 2002 restructuring charges consisted of: $136 million of asset write-offs and losses on the sale of assets and $65 million of costs for leases and other obligations in the markets restructured or exited, $56 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $15 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of certain home office facilities, and $10 million of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future. These changes were partially offset by a $15 million reversal of accrued restructuring costs recorded in 2001, primarily due to lower employee-related costs than originally estimated.
In 2001, the Company recorded $200 million of pretax restructuring charges related to the strategic changes and restaurant initiatives in the U.S. and certain international markets. The initiatives were designed to improve the restaurant experience and included accelerated operations training, restaurant simplification, incentives for outstanding restaurant operations and an enhanced national restaurant evaluation system. In connection with these initiatives, the Company eliminated approximately 850 positions, consisting of 700 positions in the U.S., primarily in the divisions and regions, and 150 positions in international markets.
The 2001 restructuring charges consisted of: $114 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $69 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of region and division facilities, and $17 million of other cash costs, primarily consisting of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future.
Restaurant closings/asset impairment
In 2002, the Company recorded $402 million of pretax charges consisting of: $302 million related to management's decision to close 751 underperforming restaurants (234 were closed in 2002 and 517 will close throughout 2003) primarily in the U.S. and Japan, and $100 million primarily related to the impairment of assets for certain existing restaurants in Europe and Latin America. Most of the restaurants identified for closing had negative cash flows and/or very low annual sales volumes. Also, in many cases they would have required significant capital investment over the next several years to remain financially viable.
In 2001, the Company recorded $135 million of pretax charges consisting of: $91 million related to the closing of 163 underperforming restaurants in international markets in 2001, a $24 million asset impairment charge due to an assessment of the ongoing impact of Turkey's significant currency devaluation on our business, and $20 million related to the disposition of Aroma Café in the U.K.
Although restaurant closings occur each year, these 2002 and 2001 restaurant closing charges are identified as "significant items" because they were the result of separate intensive reviews by management in conjunction with other strategic actions.
Technology write-offs and other charges
In 2002, the Company recorded $184 million of pretax charges consisting of: $170 million primarily related to the write-off of software development costs as a result of management's decision to terminate a long-term technology project, and $14 million primarily related to the write-off of receivables and inventory in Venezuela as a result of the temporary closure of all McDonald's restaurants due to the national strike that began in early December. Although the terminated technology project was projected to deliver long-term benefits, it was no longer viewed as the best use of capital in the current environment, as the anticipated Systemwide cost over several years was expected to be in excess of $1 billion.
In 2001, the Company recorded $55 million of pretax charges consisting of: $18 million primarily related to the write-off of certain technology, $12 million (recorded in nonoperating expense) primarily related to the write-off of a corporate investment, and $25 million primarily related to
10
the unrecoverable costs incurred in connection with the theft of winning game pieces from the Company's Monopoly and certain other promotional games over an extended period of time, and the related termination of the supplier of the game pieces. Fifty individuals (none of whom were Company employees) were convicted of conspiracy and/or mail fraud charges.
McDonald's Japan IPO gain
In 2001, McDonald's Japan, the Company's largest market in the Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa (APMEA) segment, completed an IPO of 12 million shares. The Company owns 50% of McDonald's Japan, while the Company's founding partner Den Fujita and his family own approximately 26%. The Company recorded a $137 million gain (pre and after tax) in nonoperating income to reflect an increase in the carrying value of its investment as a result of the cash proceeds from the IPO received by McDonald's Japan.
EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES ON REPORTED RESULTS
While changing foreign currencies affect reported results, McDonald's lessens exposures, where practical, by financing in local currencies, hedging certain foreign-denominated cash flows and by purchasing goods and services in local currencies.
Effect of foreign currency translation on consolidated reported resultspositive/(negative)
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 15 | $ | (457 | ) | $ | (594 | ) | ||
Operating income | 90 | (78 | ) | (151 | ) | |||||
Net income | 42 | (50 | ) | (92 | ) | |||||
Net income per common sharediluted | .04 | (.04 | ) | (.07 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
In 2002, foreign currency translation had a minimal impact on the revenue growth rate as the stronger Euro and British Pound were offset by weaker Latin American currencies (primarily the Argentine Peso, Brazilian Real and Venezuelan Bolivar). The operating income growth rate for 2002 was positively impacted by foreign currency translation primarily due to the stronger Euro and British Pound. In 2001, foreign currency translation had a negative impact on the growth rates primarily due to the weaker Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar, Japanese Yen and Canadian Dollar.
All information presented in constant currencies excludes the effect of foreign currency translation on reported results except for hyperinflationary economies, whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. Constant currency results are calculated by translating the current year results at prior year average exchange rates.
SYSTEMWIDE SALES
Systemwide sales include sales by all restaurants, whether operated by the Company, by franchisees or by affiliates operating under joint-venture agreements. Management believes that Systemwide sales information is useful in analyzing the Company's revenues because franchisees and affiliates pay rent, service fees and/or royalties that generally are based on a percent of sales with specified minimum payments.
Systemwide sales
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Constant
currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Constant
currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 20,306 | 1 | % | na | $ | 20,051 | 2 | % | na | $ | 19,573 | |||||
Europe | 10,476 | 11 | 5 | % | 9,412 | 1 | 5 | % | 9,293 | ||||||||
APMEA | 6,776 | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 7,010 | (6 | ) | 3 | 7,477 | |||||||
Latin America | 1,444 | (17 | ) | 4 | 1,733 | (3 | ) | 6 | 1,790 | ||||||||
Canada | 1,456 | 1 | 2 | 1,447 | | 5 | 1,443 | ||||||||||
Partner Brands | 1,068 | 9 | 9 | 977 | 61 | 62 | 605 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total | $ | 41,526 | 2 | % | 2 | % | $ | 40,630 | 1 | % | 4 | % | $ | 40,181 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant expansion, partly offset by negative comparable sales, drove the consolidated constant currency sales increases in 2002 and 2001.
Sales in the U.S. increased in 2002 and 2001 due to expansion. Results in 2002 reflected the overall slowdown in the restaurant industry and increased competition.
The primary contributors to Europe's constant currency sales growth in both years were France and Russia. In addition, the U.K. contributed to the increases in 2002 and 2001, although comparable sales were negative in both years. Europe's results for both years were impacted by negative comparable sales in Germany, where the economy continued to contract. We expect the difficult economic conditions in Germany to continue in the near term. In 2001, despite the Company's outstanding quality and safety record, Europe's results were negatively impacted by consumer confidence issues regarding the European beef supply in several markets.
Sales results in APMEA declined in 2002 in constant currencies primarily due to negative comparable sales in Japan, which were in part due to continuing weak economic conditions, partly offset by a strong performance in Australia and expansion in China. In 2001, the constant currency sales increase was driven by strong results in China, partly offset by weak results in Japan, Taiwan and Turkey, and weak consumer spending in Australia. Beginning in late 2001 and continuing in 2002, sales were also dampened by consumer confidence issues regarding food safety throughout Japan.
In Latin America, constant currency sales increased in both 2002 and 2001, despite the fact that many markets continued to be impacted by weak economic conditions. The increase in 2002 was primarily due to positive comparable sales in Brazil and expansion in Mexico, while in 2001 positive comparable sales in Mexico and Venezuela drove the increase.
The Company expects the weak economic conditions in many markets in APMEA (including Japan) and Latin America to continue in the near term.
11
In Canada, constant currency sales increased in 2002 due to expansion, partly offset by negative comparable sales, while the 2001 constant currency sales increase was driven by positive comparable sales and expansion.
The sales increase in Partner Brands in 2002 was primarily due to expansion and positive comparable sales at Chipotle. The sales increase in 2001 was primarily due to the acquisition of Boston Market in second quarter 2000. In addition, expansion of Chipotle along with strong comparable sales at Chipotle and Boston Market helped drive the increase in 2001.
Comparable salesMcDonald's restaurants
Average annual salesMcDonald's restaurants
Average sales per restaurant in constant currencies are affected by comparable sales as well as the size, location and number of new restaurants. The number of new restaurants affects average sales because new restaurants typically take a few years to reach long-term sales volumes. In addition, over the last several years more restaurants outside the U.S. have opened in less populated areas and in countries with lower average sales volumes and correspondingly lower average development costs.
Average annual salesMcDonald's restaurants
|
|
|
|
Constant currency
increase/(decrease)(2) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As reported amounts
|
|||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
|
||||||||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
2002
|
2001
|
||||||||||
Per restaurant(1) | ||||||||||||||
Traditional: | ||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 1,628 | $ | 1,650 | $ | 1,647 | (1 | )% | | |||||
Europe | 1,821 | 1,722 | 1,851 | | (4 | )% | ||||||||
APMEA | 1,091 | 1,190 | 1,376 | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Latin America | 931 | 1,154 | 1,333 | 1 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Canada | 1,395 | 1,469 | 1,530 | (4 | ) | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Satellite: | ||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 554 | $ | 546 | $ | 536 | 1 | % | 2 | % | ||||
Outside the U.S.(3) | 483 | 533 | 598 | (7 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
In 2002, average annual sales per traditional restaurant in the U.S. declined slightly primarily due to negative comparable sales. In Europe, average annual sales per traditional restaurant were relatively flat in constant currencies. In APMEA and Canada, average annual sales per traditional restaurant declined in constant currencies primarily due to negative comparable sales and the impact of new restaurants. In Latin America, average annual sales per traditional restaurant increased slightly in constant currencies due to positive comparable sales. All segments benefited from the closing of underperforming restaurants in 2002 and 2001.
In 2001, average annual sales per traditional restaurant were relatively flat for the U.S. and Canada in constant currencies. In other segments, negative comparable sales and the significant number of new restaurants, partly offset by the benefit of closing underperforming restaurants, drove the decreases in average annual sales per traditional restaurant.
Satellite restaurants generally have significantly lower development costs and sales volumes than traditional restaurants. The use of these small, limited-menu restaurants has allowed profitable expansion into areas that otherwise would not be feasible (e.g., discount retail stores and airports). In 2002 and 2001, average annual sales for satellite restaurants increased in the U.S. This was due in part to our continued assessment of the appropriate use of these limited-menu sites and the closing of certain low-volume sites. Outside the U.S., average annual sales for satellite restaurants declined in constant currencies in both years primarily due to negative comparable sales in Japan, where the majority of satellites outside the U.S. are located. In connection with the restaurant closings previously discussed, the Company's Japanese affiliate will close more than 100 satellite restaurants in 2003.
REVENUES
Revenues include sales by Company-operated restaurants and fees from restaurants operated by franchisees or affiliates under joint-venture agreements. These fees include rent, service fees and/or royalties that are based on a percent of sales with specified minimum payments along with initial fees. Fees vary by type of site and investment by the Company and also according to local business conditions. These fees, along with occupancy and operating rights, are stipulated in franchise agreements that generally have 20-year terms.
Revenues grow as sales build in existing restaurants and as new restaurants are added. Menu price changes also affect revenues and sales, but it is impractical to quantify their impact because of different pricing structures, new products, promotions and product-mix variations among restaurants and markets.
Systemwide sales and revenues may grow at different rates during a given period, primarily due to a change in the mix of Company-operated, franchised and affiliated restaurants. For example, this mix is impacted by purchases and sales of restaurants between the Company and franchisees. Company-operated restaurants generated about 30% of Systemwide sales and about 75% of revenues for all periods presented.
12
Revenues
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Constant
currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Constant
currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
||||||||||
Company-operated sales: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 3,172 | 1 | % | na | $ | 3,139 | 2 | % | na | $ | 3,064 | |||||
Europe | 3,982 | 7 | 2 | % | 3,727 | | 4 | % | 3,730 | ||||||||
APMEA | 2,115 | 9 | 8 | 1,938 | 4 | 11 | 1,857 | ||||||||||
Latin America | 696 | (15 | ) | 12 | 821 | 7 | 18 | 764 | |||||||||
Canada | 505 | 6 | 7 | 478 | (2 | ) | 2 | 490 | |||||||||
Partner Brands | 1,030 | 10 | 10 | 938 | 67 | 67 | 562 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Company-operated sales | $ | 11,500 | 4 | % | 4 | % | $ | 11,041 | 5 | % | 9 | % | $ | 10,467 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Franchised and affiliated revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 2,251 | | na | $ | 2,257 | 3 | % | na | $ | 2,195 | ||||||
Europe | 1,154 | 13 | % | 6 | % | 1,025 | | 4 | % | 1,024 | |||||||
APMEA | 253 | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | 265 | 8 | 21 | 245 | ||||||||
Latin America | 118 | (21 | ) | (8 | ) | 150 | (19 | ) | (11 | ) | 185 | ||||||
Canada | 128 | (2 | ) | | 130 | 4 | 8 | 125 | |||||||||
Partner Brands | 2 | | | 2 | | | 2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total franchised and affiliated revenues | $ | 3,906 | 2 | % | 1 | % | $ | 3,829 | 1 | % | 4 | % | $ | 3,776 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 5,423 | 1 | % | na | $ | 5,396 | 3 | % | na | $ | 5,259 | |||||
Europe | 5,136 | 8 | 3 | % | 4,752 | | 4 | % | 4,754 | ||||||||
APMEA | 2,368 | 7 | 7 | 2,203 | 5 | 12 | 2,102 | ||||||||||
Latin America | 814 | (16 | ) | 9 | 971 | 2 | 12 | 949 | |||||||||
Canada | 633 | 4 | 6 | 608 | (1 | ) | 3 | 615 | |||||||||
Partner Brands | 1,032 | 10 | 10 | 940 | 67 | 67 | 564 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 15,406 | 4 | % | 4 | % | $ | 14,870 | 4 | % | 8 | % | $ | 14,243 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a constant currency basis, total revenues increased at a higher rate than Systemwide sales in 2002 primarily due to significantly lower sales from our affiliate in Japan. Under our affiliate structure, we record a royalty in revenues based on a percentage of Japan's sales, whereas all of Japan's sales are included in Systemwide sales. For this reason, Japan's sales decline had a larger negative impact on Systemwide sales than on revenues. In 2001, total revenues increased at a higher rate than Systemwide sales primarily due to the second quarter 2000 acquisition of Boston Market restaurants, which were all Company-operated, and the restructuring of our ownership in the Philippines, effective July 1, 2001. As a result of the restructuring, most of our restaurants in the Philippines are now Company-operated rather than franchised. In addition, revenues in 2001 benefited from an increase in the royalty percent received from our Japanese affiliate, effective January 1, 2001.
In the U.S., growth rates for Systemwide sales and total revenues were similar in 2002 and 2001. In both periods, Europe's total revenue growth rates were lower than the Systemwide sales growth rates primarily due to a lower percentage of Company-operated restaurants and an increase in rent assistance to franchisees compared with the prior year. APMEA's total revenue growth rates were higher than the Systemwide sales growth rates for both periods primarily due to our affiliate structure in Japan and a higher percentage of Company-operated restaurants, in part due to the restructuring of the Philippines. In addition, the total revenue growth rate in 2001 benefited from an increase in the royalty percent received from our Japanese affiliate. In Latin America, total revenue growth rates were higher than Systemwide sales growth rates for both periods primarily due to a higher percentage of Company-operated restaurants compared with the prior year.
OPERATING INCOME
Consolidated operating income decreased $584 million or 22% in 2002 and $633 million or 19% in 2001; however, significant charges of $853 million in 2002 and $378 million in 2001 were included in operating income. Operating income for both years included higher selling, general & administrative expenses and lower other operating income. Combined operating margin dollars were higher in 2002 than in 2001 and lower in 2001 than in 2000.
Operating income from the major markets accounted for substantially all of consolidated operating income in 2002, 2001 and 2000.
The following table presents reported operating income amounts and growth rates along with the growth rates adjusted for foreign currency translation and significant items. Adjusted constant currency operating income is one of the primary measures used to evaluate segment performance, because management believes that adjusted constant currency operating income reflects the most accurate representation of ongoing business operations.
Operating income
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
|||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Adjusted
constant currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Adjusted
constant currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
|||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 1,673 | 3 | % | (2 | )% | $ | 1,622 | (10 | )% | | $ | 1,795 | |||||
Europe | 1,022 | (4 | ) | | 1,063 | (10 | ) | (3 | )% | 1,180 | ||||||||
APMEA | 64 | (80 | ) | (23 | ) | 325 | (28 | ) | (10 | ) | 451 | |||||||
Latin America | (133 | ) | nm | nm | 11 | (89 | ) | (46 | ) | 103 | ||||||||
Canada | 125 | 1 | 2 | 124 | (2 | ) | 10 | 126 | ||||||||||
Partner Brands | (66 | ) | | 22 | (66 | ) | (61 | ) | | (41 | ) | |||||||
Corporate | (572 | ) | (50 | ) | (8 | ) | (382 | ) | (35 | ) | (22 | ) | (284 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,113 | (22 | )% | (6 | )% | $ | 2,697 | (19 | )% | (5 | )% | $ | 3,330 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The following table presents reconciliations of reported operating results to adjusted constant currency operating results by segment for both 2002 and 2001.
Reconciliation of reported operating results to adjusted constant currency operating results
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
U.S.
|
Europe
|
APMEA
|
Latin
America |
Canada
|
Partner
Brands |
Corporate
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As reported operating income (loss) | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 64 | $ | (133 | ) | $ | 125 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | (572 | ) | $ | 2,113 | ||||||
Restructuring charges | 25 | 9 | 141 | 66 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 267 | |||||||||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 74 | 135 | 81 | 62 | 4 | 31 | 15 | 402 | |||||||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 4 | 14 | 4 | 162 | 184 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Currency effect | (61 | ) | (6 | ) | (22 | ) | 2 | (87 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted constant currency operating income (loss) | $ | 1,772 | $ | 1,109 | $ | 280 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 137 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (374 | ) | $ | 2,879 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As reported operating income (loss) | $ | 1,622 | $ | 1,063 | $ | 325 | $ | 11 | $ | 124 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | (382 | ) | $ | 2,697 | |||||||
Restructuring charges | 156 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 20 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 39 | 35 | 37 | 4 | 20 | 135 | |||||||||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 25 | 4 | 14 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Currency effect | 37 | 38 | 4 | 5 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted constant currency operating income (loss) | $ | 1,803 | $ | 1,146 | $ | 405 | $ | 55 | $ | 139 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (348 | ) | $ | 3,159 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. adjusted operating income decreased 2% in 2002 and was relatively flat in 2001 compared with 2000. The decrease in 2002 was due to lower combined operating margin dollars and lower other operating income, partly offset by lower selling, general & administrative expenses. Other operating income included $22 million of payments made to U.S. owner/operators to facilitate the introduction of a new front counter team service system. In 2001, higher combined operating margin dollars were offset by higher selling, general & administrative expenses and slightly lower other operating income. U.S. adjusted operating income accounted for more than 50% of consolidated adjusted operating income in 2002, 2001 and 2000.
Europe's adjusted operating income accounted for more than 35% of consolidated adjusted operating income in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Europe's adjusted operating income was relatively flat in 2002 compared with 2001 and decreased 3% in 2001. The segment's results benefited from strong performances in France and Russia in both years; however, difficult economic conditions in Germany and weak results in the U.K. negatively impacted results. In 2001, consumer confidence issues regarding the European beef supply negatively impacted Europe's results. France, Germany and the U.K. accounted for about 75% of Europe's adjusted operating income in all three years.
APMEA's adjusted operating income decreased 23% in 2002 and 10% in 2001. In 2002, strong results in Australia were more than offset by weak results in Japan and Hong Kong. In 2001, strong results in China, the increase in the royalty percent received from our affiliate in Japan and a gain on the sale of real estate in Singapore were more than offset by weak results in Australia, Japan, Taiwan and Turkey. Australia, Japan and China accounted for about 70% of APMEA's adjusted operating income in all three years.
Latin America's adjusted operating income declined significantly for both periods due to the continuing difficult economic conditions experienced by most markets in the segment. In addition, Latin America's results in 2002 were negatively impacted by a higher provision for uncollectible receivables as well as the temporary closure of all McDonald's restaurants in Venezuela due to the national strike that began in early December 2002. Although the strike ended in February 2003, the Company expects the continued turmoil in Venezuela to impact results in 2003.
The adjusted operating results for the Partner Brands improved 22% in 2002 and were flat in 2001 compared with 2000. The improvement in 2002 was primarily driven by the elimination of goodwill amortization beginning January 1, 2002 and continued strong results at Chipotle.
The Corporate segment reflected higher spending on technology in 2002 and 2001.
OPERATING MARGINS
Operating margin information and discussions relate to McDonald's restaurants only and exclude Partner Brands.
Company-operated margins
Company-operated margin dollars represent sales by Company-operated restaurants less the operating costs of these restaurants. Company-operated margin dollars declined $12 million in 2002 and $145 million in 2001. In constant currencies, Company-operated margin dollars declined $41 million or 3% in 2002 and $96 million or 6% in 2001.
14
The constant currency decreases in both years were primarily due to negative comparable sales and higher labor rates, partly offset by expansion.
Company-operated marginsMcDonald's restaurants
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 507 | $ | 501 | $ | 521 | ||||
Europe | 631 | 626 | 683 | |||||||
APMEA | 239 | 240 | 296 | |||||||
Latin America | 66 | 83 | 95 | |||||||
Canada | 70 | 75 | 75 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total | $ | 1,513 | $ | 1,525 | $ | 1,670 | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
PERCENT OF SALES | ||||||||||
U.S. | 16.0 | % | 16.0 | % | 17.0 | % | ||||
Europe | 15.9 | 16.8 | 18.3 | |||||||
APMEA | 11.3 | 12.4 | 15.9 | |||||||
Latin America | 9.4 | 10.1 | 12.4 | |||||||
Canada | 13.7 | 15.6 | 15.4 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total | 14.4 | % | 15.1 | % | 16.9 | % | ||||
|
|
|
Operating cost trends as a percent of sales were as follows: food & paper costs decreased in 2002 and increased in 2001; payroll costs as well as occupancy & other operating expenses increased for both periods.
The U.S. Company-operated margin percent in 2002 benefited from the elimination of goodwill amortization and a lower contribution rate to the national co-op for advertising expenses. However, these benefits were offset by negative comparable sales and higher labor costs. Food & paper costs were lower as a percent of sales in 2002 and 2001, while payroll costs were higher in both years. Occupancy & other operating expenses as a percent of sales were lower in 2002 than in 2001 and higher in 2001 than in 2000.
Europe's Company-operated margins as a percent of sales declined in 2002, primarily due to higher payroll and occupancy costs, partly offset by lower food & paper costs as a percent of sales. In 2001, Europe's Company-operated margin percent declined, primarily due to higher payroll costs and negative comparable sales.
In APMEA, negative comparable sales in 2002 and 2001 affected Company-operated margins as a percent of sales. In 2001, a change in restaurant classification in the Philippines also contributed to APMEA's margin decline because its Company-operated margins were lower than the average for the segment. In Latin America, declines in margins as a percent of sales in both years were due to difficult economic conditions in most markets. In Canada, negative comparable sales in 2002 affected Company-operated margins as a percent of sales.
Franchised margins
Franchised margin dollars represent revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants less the Company's occupancy costs (rent and depreciation) associated with those sites. Franchised margin dollars represented more than 60% of the combined operating margins in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Franchised margin dollars increased $36 million in 2002 and $26 million in 2001. In constant currencies, franchised margin dollars were relatively flat in 2002 and increased $91 million or 3% in 2001. The constant currency increase in 2001 was primarily driven by expansion and an increase in the Japan royalty percent.
Franchised marginsMcDonald's restaurants
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,799 | $ | 1,765 | ||||
Europe | 885 | 792 | 802 | |||||||
APMEA | 217 | 229 | 199 | |||||||
Latin America | 79 | 103 | 135 | |||||||
Canada | 102 | 105 | 101 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total | $ | 3,064 | $ | 3,028 | $ | 3,002 | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
PERCENT OF REVENUES | ||||||||||
U.S. | 79.1 | % | 79.7 | % | 80.4 | % | ||||
Europe | 76.7 | 77.2 | 78.3 | |||||||
APMEA | 85.8 | 86.2 | 81.5 | |||||||
Latin America | 66.9 | 68.4 | 73.0 | |||||||
Canada | 79.2 | 80.4 | 80.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total | 78.5 | % | 79.1 | % | 79.5 | % | ||||
|
|
|
The declines in the consolidated franchised margin percent in 2002 and 2001 reflected negative comparable sales, higher rent assistance to franchisees primarily in the U.S. and Europe, and higher occupancy costs, due in part to an increased proportion of leased sites in all geographic segments. APMEA's franchised margin percent in both years benefited from the restructuring of our ownership in the Philippines in July 2001. The restructuring resulted in the reclassification of restaurants and related margins, that were lower than the average for the segment, from franchised to Company-operated. In addition, the franchised margin percent in APMEA in 2001 benefited from the increase in the Japan royalty percent.
15
SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Consolidated selling, general & administrative expenses increased 3% in 2002 and 5% in 2001 (4% and 7% in constant currencies). The increase in 2002 was primarily due to increased spending on technology in the Corporate segment, higher advertising expenses in the U.S. primarily related to the introduction of the Dollar Menu, and higher expenses for Partner Brands. The increase in 2001 was due to increased spending on technology in the Corporate segment and higher expenses for Partner Brands, partly offset by lower Company-wide performance-based incentive compensation compared with the prior year. Selling, general & administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 4.1% in 2002 and 2001 and 4.0% in 2000.
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
|
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Constant
currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
As
reported |
Constant
currency(1) |
As
reported amount |
||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 558 | (1 | )% | na | $ | 563 | 1 | % | na | $ | 559 | |||||
Europe | 359 | 9 | 4 | % | 328 | (2 | ) | 1 | % | 336 | |||||||
APMEA | 158 | 4 | 3 | 152 | 2 | 9 | 149 | ||||||||||
Latin America | 102 | (19 | ) | 3 | 126 | 5 | 14 | 120 | |||||||||
Canada | 49 | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | 51 | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | 54 | ||||||
Partner Brands | 114 | 13 | 12 | 102 | 20 | 20 | 85 | ||||||||||
Corporate(2) | 373 | 10 | na | 340 | 20 | na | 284 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,713 | 3 | % | 4 | % | $ | 1,662 | 5 | % | 7 | % | $ | 1,587 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
Other operating (income) expense includes gains on sales of restaurant businesses, equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, restructuring charges, restaurant closings/asset impairment charges and other transactions related to franchising and the food service business.
Other operating (income) expense, net
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses | $ | (114 | ) | $ | (112 | ) | $ | (87 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | (24 | ) | (63 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||||
Team service system paymentsU.S. | 22 | |||||||||||
Bad debts and other expense | 96 | 54 | 12 | |||||||||
Significant items:(1) | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 267 | 200 | ||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 402 | 135 | ||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 184 | 43 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total significant items | 853 | 378 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total | $ | 833 | $ | 257 | $ | (196 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses include gains from sales of Company-operated restaurants as well as gains from exercises of purchase options by franchisees with business facilities lease arrangements (arrangements where the Company leases the businesses, including equipment, to franchisees who have options to purchase the businesses). The Company's purchases and sales of businesses with its franchisees and affiliates are aimed at achieving an optimal ownership mix in each market. Resulting gains or losses are recorded in operating income because the transactions are an integral part of our business.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliatesbusinesses in which the Company actively participates but does not controlis reported after interest expense and income taxes, except for U.S. restaurant partnerships, which are reported before income taxes. The decrease in 2002 was due to a net loss from our Japanese affiliate. The decrease in 2001 was due to lower earnings from our Japanese affiliate, the increase in Japan's royalty expense and a weaker Japanese Yen. Although the increase in royalty expense reduced McDonald's equity in earnings for Japan in 2001 compared with 2000, it was more than offset at the operating income level by the royalty benefit McDonald's received in franchised revenues.
Team service system payments
In 2002, the Company made payments to U.S. owner/operators to facilitate the introduction of a new front counter team service system.
Bad debts and other expense
Bad debts and other expense for 2002 and 2001 increased primarily due to higher provisions for uncollectible receivables (primarily in Europe and Latin America). In addition, other expense for 2002 was partly offset by a benefit from the elimination of goodwill amortization.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense decreased in 2002 due to lower average interest rates, partly offset by higher average debt levels and stronger foreign currencies. Interest expense increased in 2001 due to higher average debt levels, partly offset by weaker foreign currencies and lower average interest rates. Average debt levels were higher in both years because the Company used its available credit capacity to repurchase shares of its common stock.
NONOPERATING EXPENSE, NET
Nonoperating expense includes miscellaneous income and expense items such as interest income, minority interests, and gains and losses related to other investments, financings and translation. Nonoperating expense in 2002 reflected higher minority interest expense and foreign currency translation losses in 2002 compared with foreign currency translation gains in 2001. In addition, nonoperating expense in 2001 included $12 million primarily related to the write-off of a corporate investment as well as minority interest expense related to the sale of real estate in Singapore.
16
The following table presents the reported effective income tax rates as well as the effective income tax rates excluding significant items.
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reported effective income tax rates | 40.3 | % | 29.8 | % | 31.4 | % | |
Impact of significant items(1) | (7.6 | ) | 1.3 | | |||
|
|
|
|||||
Effective income tax rates, excluding significant items | 32.7 | % | 31.1 | % | 31.4 | % | |
|
|
|
The 2001 effective income tax rate reflected a benefit from the impact of tax law changes in certain international markets and the 2000 effective income tax rate reflected a tax benefit resulting from an international transaction.
Consolidated net deferred tax liabilities included tax assets, net of valuation allowance, of $867 million in 2002 and $720 million in 2001. Substantially all of the net tax assets arose in the U.S. and other profitable markets.
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , which eliminates the amortization of goodwill and instead subjects it to annual impairment tests. As a result of the initial required goodwill impairment test, the Company recorded a noncash charge of $99 million after tax ($0.07 per diluted share) in first quarter 2002 to reflect the cumulative effect of this accounting change. The impaired goodwill was primarily in Argentina, Uruguay and other markets in Latin America and the Middle East, where economies have weakened significantly in recent years.
NET INCOME AND NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
In 2002, income before the cumulative effect of the goodwill accounting change decreased $645 million or 39%, and diluted income per common share before the cumulative effect of this accounting change decreased $0.48 or 38%. Net income, which included the charge for the cumulative effect of the accounting change decreased 45% and diluted net income per common share decreased 44%. In 2001, net income decreased $340 million or 17% and diluted net income per common share decreased $0.21 or 14%. Results for 2002 included significant charges of $700 million or $0.55 per share, and results for 2001 included significant items totaling $143 million or $0.11 of expense per share discussed on page 9.
CASH FLOWS
The Company generates significant cash from operations and has substantial credit capacity to fund operating and discretionary spending. Cash from operations totaled $2.9 billion and exceeded capital expenditures by $886 million in 2002, while cash from operations totaled $2.7 billion and exceeded capital expenditures by $782 million in 2001. Cash provided by operations, along with borrowings and other sources of cash, is used for capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividends and debt repayments. The Company expects to use future cash provided by operations to fund the remaining employee severance and lease obligations associated with the significant charges in 2002 and 2001.
Cash provided by operations
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash provided by operations | $ | 2,890 | $ | 2,688 | $ | 2,751 | ||||
Cash provided by operations as a percent of capital expenditures | 144 | % | 141 | % | 141 | % | ||||
Cash provided by operations as a percent of average total debt | 31 | % | 31 | % | 35 | % | ||||
|
|
|
In addition to its cash provided by operations, the Company can meet short-term funding needs through commercial paper borrowings and line of credit agreements. Accordingly, the Company purposefully maintains a relatively low current ratio, which was .71 at year-end 2002.
RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Systemwide restaurants at year end(1)
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | 13,491 | 13,099 | 12,804 | |||||
Europe | 6,070 | 5,794 | 5,460 | |||||
APMEA | 7,555 | 7,321 | 6,771 | |||||
Latin America | 1,605 | 1,581 | 1,510 | |||||
Canada | 1,304 | 1,223 | 1,154 | |||||
Partner Brands: | ||||||||
Boston Market | 662 | 657 | 707 | |||||
Chipotle | 232 | 177 | 104 | |||||
Donatos | 181 | 197 | 156 | |||||
Other | 8 | 44 | 41 | |||||
|
|
|
||||||
Total Partner Brands | 1,083 | 1,075 | 1,008 | |||||
|
|
|
||||||
Total | 31,108 | 30,093 | 28,707 | |||||
|
|
|
In 2002, the Company opened 1,247 traditional McDonald's restaurants and 392 satellite restaurants, and closed 474 traditional restaurants and 158 satellite restaurants. In 2001, the Company opened 1,406 traditional McDonald's restaurants and 383 satellite restaurants, and closed 335 traditional restaurants and 135 satellite restaurants.
In 2002, about 85% of McDonald's restaurant additions occurred in the major markets. Approximately 60% of Company-operated restaurants and more than 85% of franchised restaurants were located in the major markets at the end of 2002. Franchisees and affiliates operated 73% of
17
McDonald's restaurants at year-end 2002. Partner Brand restaurants are primarily Company-operated.
Capital expenditures increased $98 million or 5% in 2002 and decreased $39 million or 2% in 2001. The increase in capital expenditures in 2002 was primarily due to higher spending for McDonald's restaurant business in the U.S. and Canada, partly offset by lower capital expenditures for new restaurants in Latin America. The decrease in 2001 was primarily due to lower spending in Europe and Latin America and weaker foreign currencies, partly offset by additional expenditures for Partner Brands as well as for McDonald's restaurant business in the U.S. and China. Capital expenditures for McDonald's restaurants in 2002, 2001 and 2000 reflected our strategy of leasing a higher proportion of new sites and also the U.S. building program, which gave franchisees the option to own new restaurant buildings.
The Company's expenditures for new restaurants in the U.S. were lower than they would have been as a result of the leasing strategy and the U.S. building program. About 65% in 2002 and 80% in 2001 of new and rebuilt U.S. traditional franchised and affiliated restaurant buildings were purchased by franchisees and affiliates. Beginning in 2003, to give our best franchisees additional financial flexibility to purchase more McDonald's restaurant businesses as well as to reinvest in their existing restaurants, the Company plans to purchase buildings for new franchised restaurants. As a result of owning the buildings, the Company expects to collect additional rent from the franchisees. In addition, the Company is purchasing a higher proportion of land for new restaurants in the U.S.
The Company and its affiliates owned 38% of the land for its restaurant sites at year-end 2002 and 2001. For leased land, the Company maintains long-term occupancy rights for the land and receives related rental income.
Capital expenditures invested in major markets excluding Japan represented approximately 70% of the total in 2002 and 60% in 2001 and 2000. (Japan is accounted for under the equity method, and accordingly, its capital expenditures are not included in consolidated amounts.)
Capital expenditures
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New restaurants | $ | 1,161 | $ | 1,198 | $ | 1,308 | |||
Existing restaurants(1) | 659 | 571 | 507 | ||||||
Other properties(2) | 184 | 137 | 130 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Total | $ | 2,004 | $ | 1,906 | $ | 1,945 | |||
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,971 | $ | 22,535 | $ | 21,684 | |||
|
|
|
Average development costs incurred by the U.S. System (land, building and equipment) for new traditional McDonald's restaurants were $1.7 million in 2002 and 2001 and $1.6 million in 2000.
Average development costs outside the U.S. vary widely by market depending on the types of restaurants built and the real estate and construction costs within each market. These costs, which include land, buildings and equipment owned by the Company, are managed through the use of optimally sized restaurants, construction and design efficiencies, standardization and global sourcing. In addition, foreign currency fluctuations affect average development costs.
Average development costs for new traditional McDonald's restaurants in major markets outside the U.S. excluding Japan were approximately $1.6 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Average annual sales for new traditional McDonald's restaurants in the same markets were about $1.3 million in 2002 and 2001 and $1.5 million in 2000. Average development costs for new satellite restaurants (excluding lease costs) located in Canada, Germany and Japan, which comprise about 95% of the satellites outside the U.S., were about $250,000 in 2002 and about $220,000 in 2001 and 2000. The use of these small, limited-menu restaurants, for which the land and building generally are leased, has allowed expansion into areas that otherwise would not have been feasible.
Capital expenditures by affiliates in international markets, primarily Japan, which were not included in consolidated amounts, were about $204 million in 2002, $181 million in 2001 and $204 million in 2000.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company and six unaffiliated companies that supply the "McDonald's System" (McDonald's franchisees, suppliers and the Company) are equal owners of System Capital Corporation (SCC). SCC's purpose is to provide funding to McDonald's franchisees, suppliers to the McDonald's System and McDonald's Corporation and to build equity within SCC that will benefit the McDonald's System. No employees of SCC are employees of the seven shareholders. SCC competes with other lenders who provide similar financing to McDonald's franchisees and suppliers and the Company has no independent obligation to provide financing to these franchisees and suppliers. SCC's function is similar to that of a cooperative and its primary operating activities include (1) providing loans to qualifying U.S. franchisees to purchase existing restaurant businesses as well as finance equipment, buildings and working capital, (2) purchasing accounts receivable and financing inventory and other needs of eligible suppliers and distributors, and (3) acquiring land and leasing it to McDonald's Corporation for new restaurants, primarily in the U.S.
SCC assets totaled $1.7 billion at December 31, 2002. See summary of significant accounting policies on page 31 for further details on SCC.
SHARE REPURCHASES AND DIVIDENDS
During 2002, the Company purchased 25.6 million shares of McDonald's stock for approximately $687 million, of which 20.1 million shares for $536 million were under a new $5.0 billion share repurchase program.
During 2001 and 2000, the Company sold 12.2 million and 16.8 million common equity put options, respectively, in connection with its share repurchase program. Premiums received were recorded in shareholders' equity as a reduction of the cost of treasury stock purchased and were $32 million
18
in 2001 and $56 million in 2000. In 2002, 10.1 million common equity put options were exercised and 2.1 million options expired unexercised, while 21.0 million options were exercised in 2001. The total amount paid to acquire these shares as a result of the options being exercised was $286 million in 2002 and $700 million in 2001. At December 31, 2002, there were no common equity put options outstanding. At December 31, 2001, the $350 million total exercise price of outstanding options was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury, net of premiums received.
During 2001, the Company also entered into equity forward contracts in connection with its share repurchase program. At December 31, 2001, the $151 million total purchase price of the forward contracts was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury. The forward contracts for 5.5 million shares settled in March 2002, and there were no additional forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2002.
The Company has paid dividends on common stock for 27 consecutive years and has increased the dividend amount every year. Additional dividend increases will be considered after reviewing returns to shareholders, profitability expectations, financing needs and tax treatment of dividends. Cash dividends are declared and paid on an annual basis. As in the past, future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
FINANCIAL POSITION AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
TOTAL ASSETS AND RETURNS
Total assets grew by $1.4 billion or 6% in 2002 and $851 million or 4% in 2001. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates increased total assets by approximately $785 million in 2002 and decreased total assets by approximately $765 million in 2001. At year-end 2002 and 2001, approximately 65% of consolidated assets was located in the major markets excluding Japan. Net property and equipment rose $1.3 billion in 2002 and represented 78% of total assets at year end.
Operating income is used to compute return on average assets, while income before cumulative effect of accounting change is used to calculate return on average common equity. Month-end balances are used to compute both average assets and average common equity.
Returns on assets and equity
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Return on average assets | 9.2 | % | 12.3 | % | 15.9 | % | |
Return on average common equity | 8.9 | 17.5 | 21.6 | ||||
Adjusted return on average assets(1) |
|
12.9 |
% |
14.1 |
% |
na |
|
Adjusted return on average common equity(1) | 16.8 | 19.1 | na | ||||
|
|
|
Return on average assets and return on average common equity both declined in 2002 and 2001, primarily due to weak operating results in APMEA and Latin America. During 2003, the Company will continue to concentrate McDonald's restaurant openings in markets with acceptable returns and will significantly reduce the amount of capital we invest in APMEA and Latin America, where returns have been pressured in recent years by weak economies.
FINANCINGS AND MARKET RISK
The Company generally borrows on a long-term basis and is exposed to the impact of interest-rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations. Debt obligations at December 31, 2002 totaled $10.0 billion compared with $8.9 billion at December 31, 2001. The increase in 2002 was due to the impact of changes in exchange rates on foreign currency-denominated debt ($645 million), SFAS No. 133 noncash fair value adjustments ($271 million), and an increase in net borrowings ($145 million).
Debt highlights(1)
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed-rate debt as a percent of total debt(2) | 62 | % | 45 | % | 58 | % | |
Weighted-average annual interest rate of total debt | 4.1 | 5.4 | 5.8 | ||||
Foreign currency-denominated debt as a percent of total debt(2) | 64 | 57 | 60 | ||||
Total debt as a percent of total capitalization (total debt and total shareholders' equity) | 49 | 48 | 48 | ||||
|
|
|
Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch currently rate McDonald's commercial paper P-1, A-1 and F1 and its long-term debt A2, A+ and A, respectively. The Company has not historically experienced difficulty in obtaining financing or refinancing existing debt. Certain of the Company's debt obligations contain cross-acceleration provisions and restrictions on Company and subsidiary mortgages and the long-term debt of certain subsidiaries. In addition, the Company is required to maintain a minimum net worth (defined as consolidated assets less consolidated liabilities) of $5 billion to comply with its line of credit agreements. There are no provisions in the Company's debt obligations that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings. The Company has $1.3 billion available under committed line of credit agreements (see debt financing note on page 35) as well as $1.8 billion under a U.S. shelf registration and $700 million under a Euro Medium-Term Notes program for future debt issuance.
The Company uses major capital markets, bank financings and derivatives to meet its financing requirements and reduce interest expense. The Company manages its debt portfolio in response to changes in interest rates and foreign currency rates by periodically retiring, redeeming and repurchasing debt, terminating exchange agreements and using derivatives.
19
The Company does not use derivatives with a level of complexity or with a risk higher than the exposures to be hedged and does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes. All exchange agreements are over-the-counter instruments.
In December 2002, the Company terminated certain interest-rate exchange agreements to effectively create fixed-rate financing for $1.8 billion of debt at interest rates that were near all-time low yields, and to reduce the potential exposure in the Company's future interest expense due to a rise in interest rates.
In managing the impact of interest-rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations, the Company uses interest-rate exchange agreements and finances in the currencies in which assets are denominated. All derivatives were recorded at fair value in the Company's Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 as follows: miscellaneous other assets$134 million; other long-term liabilities (excluding interest)$39 million; and accrued payroll and other liabilities$24 million. See summary of significant accounting policies related to financial instruments on page 29 for additional information regarding their use and the impact of SFAS No. 133 regarding derivatives.
The Company uses foreign currency debt and derivatives to hedge certain foreign currency royalties, intercompany financings and long-term investments in foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. This reduces the impact of fluctuating foreign currencies on cash flows and shareholders' equity. Total foreign currency denominated debt, including the effects of foreign currency exchange agreements, was $6.2 billion and $5.0 billion at year-end 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company does not have significant exposure to any individual counterparty and has master agreements that contain netting arrangements. Certain of these agreements also require each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. During 2002, certain counterparties were required to post collateral as aggregate exposures exceeded certain contractual limits due to increased values. At December 31, 2002, collateral in the amount of $2.2 million was posted by a counterparty while the Company was not required to collateralize any of its obligations.
The Company actively hedges selected currencies to minimize the cash exposure of foreign currency royalty and other payments received in the U.S. In addition, where practical, McDonald's restaurants purchase goods and services in local currencies resulting in natural hedges, and the Company typically finances in local currencies, creating economic hedges.
The Company's net asset exposure is diversified among a broad basket of currencies. At year-end 2002 and 2001, assets in hyperinflationary markets were principally financed in U.S. Dollars. The Company's largest net asset exposures (defined as foreign currency assets less foreign currency liabilities) at year end were as follows:
Foreign currency net asset exposures
IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS
|
2002
|
2001
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Euro | $ | 1,536 | $ | 1,251 | ||
British Pounds Sterling | 700 | 786 | ||||
Canadian Dollars | 808 | 738 | ||||
Australian Dollars | 620 | 516 | ||||
Brazilian Reais | 385 | 490 | ||||
|
|
The Company prepared sensitivity analyses of its financial instruments to determine the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates on the Company's results of operations, cash flows and the fair value of its financial instruments. The interest-rate analysis assumed a one percentage point adverse change in interest rates on all financial instruments but did not consider the effects of the reduced level of economic activity that could exist in such an environment. The foreign currency rate analysis assumed that each foreign currency rate would change by 10% in the same direction relative to the U.S. Dollar on all financial instruments; however, the analysis did not include the potential impact on sales levels or local currency prices or the effect of fluctuating currencies on the Company's anticipated foreign currency royalties and other payments received in the U.S. Based on the results of these analyses of the Company's financial instruments, neither a one percentage point adverse change in interest rates from 2002 levels nor a 10% adverse change in foreign currency rates from 2002 levels would materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows or the fair value of its financial instruments.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The Company has long-term contractual obligations primarily in the form of lease obligations (related to both Company-operated and franchised restaurants) and debt obligations. In addition, the Company has long-term revenue and cash flow streams that relate to its franchise arrangements. Cash provided by operations (including cash provided by these franchise arrangements) along with our borrowing capacity and other sources of cash will be used to satisfy the obligations. The following table summarizes the Company's contractual obligations and their aggregate maturities as well as future minimum rent payments due to the Company under existing franchise arrangements as of December 31, 2002. (See discussions of cash flows, financial position and capital resources as well as the Notes to the December 31, 2002 consolidated financial statements for further details.)
20
Contractual cash flows
|
Outflows
|
Inflows
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS
|
Operating
leases |
Debt
obligations(1) |
Minimum rent under
franchise arrangements |
||||||
2003 | $ | 913 | $ | 337 | $ | 1,735 | |||
2004 | 848 | 975 | 1,707 | ||||||
2005 | 789 | 2,017 | 1,662 | ||||||
2006 | 735 | 1,014 | 1,613 | ||||||
2007 | 683 | 663 | 1,566 | ||||||
Thereafter | 6,059 | 4,609 | 13,127 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Total | $ | 10,027 | $ | 9,615 | $ | 21,410 | |||
|
|
|
In addition to long-term obligations, the Company had guaranteed certain affiliate and other loans totaling $102 million at December 31, 2002.
OUTLOOK FOR 2003
OTHER MATTERS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Company annually reviews its financial reporting and disclosure practices and accounting policies to ensure that they provide accurate and transparent information relative to the current economic and business environment. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies the following involve a higher degree of judgment and/or complexity. (See summary of significant accounting policies more fully described on pages 28 through 32.)
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets will generate revenue. The useful lives are estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into account anticipated technological or other changes. The Company periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense in future periods.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets (including goodwill) are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of the Company's long-lived assets, the Company considers changes in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments based on the Company's experience and knowledge of operations. These estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation, competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the Company's estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges.
21
Restructuring and litigation accruals
In 2002 and 2001, the Company recorded charges related to restructuring markets, eliminating positions and strategic changes. The accruals recorded included estimates pertaining to employee termination costs and remaining lease obligations for closed facilities. Although the Company does not anticipate significant changes, the actual costs may differ from these estimates.
From time to time, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to franchisees, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each matter. The required accrual may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The Company does not believe that any such matter will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Income taxes
The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred assets will not be realized. While the Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, if these estimates and assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to adjust its valuation allowance. This could result in a charge to, or an increase in, income in the period such determination is made.
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis differences totaling $3.2 billion related to investments in certain foreign subsidiaries or affiliates. The basis differences consist primarily of undistributed earnings considered permanently invested in the businesses. If management's intentions change in the future, deferred taxes may need to be provided.
In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. The Company records accruals for the estimated outcomes of these audits, and the accruals may change in the future due to new developments in each matter.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Asset retirement obligations
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations , effective January 1, 2003. The Statement requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the cost will be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset.
Application of the new rules, which for the Company relates to lease obligations in certain international markets, is expected to result in a cumulative effect of adoption in the first quarter 2003 that will reduce net income and shareholders' equity by approximately $30 million to $40 million. The adoption of the new rules is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's ongoing results of operations or financial position.
Variable interest entities
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities , which requires an enterprise to consolidate or make certain disclosures about variable interest entities that meet certain criteria, effective July 1, 2003. The Company is currently performing an analysis to determine the applicability of FIN No. 46 to SCC. See summary of significant accounting policies on page 31 for further details.
Effects of changing pricesinflation
The Company has demonstrated an ability to manage inflationary cost increases effectively. This is because of rapid inventory turnover, the ability to adjust menu prices, cost controls and substantial property holdingsmany of which are at fixed costs and partly financed by debt made less expensive by inflation. In hyperinflationary markets, menu board prices typically are adjusted to keep pace with inflation, mitigating the effect on reported results.
Forward-looking statements
Certain forward-looking statements are included in this report. They use such words as "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "plan" and other similar terminology. These statements reflect management's current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The following are some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying our forward-looking statements: effectiveness of operating initiatives; success in advertising and promotional efforts; changes in global and local business and economic conditions, including their impact on consumer confidence; fluctuations in currency exchange and interest rates; food, labor and other operating costs; political or economic instability in local markets, including the effects of war and terrorist activities; competition, including pricing and marketing initiatives and new product offerings by the Company's competitors; consumer preferences or perceptions concerning the Company's product offerings; spending patterns and demographic trends; availability of qualified restaurant personnel; severe weather conditions; existence of positive or negative publicity regarding the Company or its industry generally; effects of legal claims; cost and deployment of capital; changes in future effective tax rates; changes in governmental regulations; and changes in applicable accounting policies and practices. The foregoing list of important factors is not all inclusive.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
22
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Part II, Item 7, page 19 of this Form 10-K.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page reference
|
|
---|---|---|
Consolidated statement of income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 | 24 | |
Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 and 2001 | 25 | |
Consolidated statement of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 | 26 | |
Consolidated statement of shareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 | 27 | |
Notes to consolidated financial statements | 28 | |
Quarterly results (unaudited) | 38 | |
Management's report | 39 | |
Report of independent auditors | 39 |
23
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||
REVENUES | |||||||||||
Sales by Company-operated restaurants | $ | 11,499.6 | $ | 11,040.7 | $ | 10,467.0 | |||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | 3,906.1 | 3,829.3 | 3,776.0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues | 15,405.7 | 14,870.0 | 14,243.0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||
Company-operated restaurant expenses | |||||||||||
Food & paper | 3,917.4 | 3,802.1 | 3,557.1 | ||||||||
Payroll & employee benefits | 3,078.2 | 2,901.2 | 2,690.2 | ||||||||
Occupancy & other operating expenses | 2,911.0 | 2,750.4 | 2,502.8 | ||||||||
Franchised restaurantsoccupancy expenses | 840.1 | 800.2 | 772.3 | ||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses | 1,712.8 | 1,661.7 | 1,587.3 | ||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | 833.3 | 257.4 | (196.4 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 13,292.8 | 12,173.0 | 10,913.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income | 2,112.9 | 2,697.0 | 3,329.7 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest expensenet of capitalized interest of $14.3, $15.2 and $16.3 | 374.1 | 452.4 | 429.9 | ||||||||
McDonald's Japan IPO gain | (137.1 | ) | |||||||||
Nonoperating expense, net | 76.7 | 52.0 | 17.5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | 1,662.1 | 2,329.7 | 2,882.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 670.0 | 693.1 | 905.0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | 992.1 | 1,636.6 | 1,977.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax benefit of $17.6 | (98.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income | $ | 893.5 | $ | 1,636.6 | $ | 1,977.3 | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Per common sharebasic: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | .78 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.49 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.08 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | .70 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.49 | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Per common sharediluted: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | .77 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.46 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.07 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | .70 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.46 | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dividends per common share | $ | .24 | $ | .23 | $ | .22 | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted-average sharesbasic | 1,273.1 | 1,289.7 | 1,323.2 | ||||||||
Weighted-average sharesdiluted | 1,281.5 | 1,309.3 | 1,356.5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
|
||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and equivalents | $ | 330.4 | $ | 418.1 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable | 855.3 | 881.9 | ||||||
Inventories, at cost, not in excess of market | 111.7 | 105.5 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 418.0 | 413.8 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total current assets | 1,715.4 | 1,819.3 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Other assets | ||||||||
Investments in and advances to affiliates | 1,037.7 | 990.2 | ||||||
Goodwill, net | 1,559.8 | 1,320.4 | ||||||
Miscellaneous | 1,074.2 | 1,115.1 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total other assets | 3,671.7 | 3,425.7 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Property and equipment | ||||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 26,218.6 | 24,106.0 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (7,635.2 | ) | (6,816.5 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Net property and equipment | 18,583.4 | 17,289.5 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,970.5 | $ | 22,534.5 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Notes payable | $ | 0.3 | $ | 184.9 | ||||
Accounts payable | 635.8 | 689.5 | ||||||
Income taxes | 16.3 | 20.4 | ||||||
Other taxes | 191.8 | 180.4 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 199.4 | 170.6 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring and restaurant closing costs | 328.5 | 144.2 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and other liabilities | 774.7 | 680.7 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 275.5 | 177.6 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total current liabilities | 2,422.3 | 2,248.3 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Long-term debt | 9,703.6 | 8,555.5 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities and minority interests | 560.0 | 629.3 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,003.7 | 1,112.2 | ||||||
Common equity put options and forward contracts | 500.8 | |||||||
Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized165.0 million shares; issuednone | ||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized3.5 billion shares; issued1,660.6 million shares | 16.6 | 16.6 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,747.3 | 1,591.2 | ||||||
Unearned ESOP compensation | (98.4 | ) | (106.7 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 19,204.4 | 18,608.3 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (1,601.3 | ) | (1,708.8 | ) | ||||
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 392.4 and 379.9 million shares | (8,987.7 | ) | (8,912.2 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 10,280.9 | 9,488.4 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 23,970.5 | $ | 22,534.5 | ||||
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS
|
||||||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 893.5 | $ | 1,636.6 | $ | 1,977.3 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | 98.6 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,050.8 | 1,086.3 | 1,010.7 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (44.6 | ) | (87.6 | ) | 60.5 | |||||||
Changes in working capital items | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 1.6 | (104.7 | ) | (67.2 | ) | |||||||
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets | (38.1 | ) | (62.9 | ) | (29.6 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable | (11.2 | ) | 10.2 | 89.7 | ||||||||
Taxes and other accrued liabilities | 448.0 | 270.4 | (45.8 | ) | ||||||||
Other (including noncash portion of significant items) | 491.5 | (60.0 | ) | (244.1 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash provided by operations | 2,890.1 | 2,688.3 | 2,751.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Investing activities | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment expenditures | (2,003.8 | ) | (1,906.2 | ) | (1,945.1 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of restaurant businesses | (548.4 | ) | (331.6 | ) | (425.5 | ) | ||||||
Sales of restaurant businesses and property | 369.5 | 375.9 | 302.8 | |||||||||
Other | (283.9 | ) | (206.3 | ) | (144.8 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash used for investing activities | (2,466.6 | ) | (2,068.2 | ) | (2,212.6 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Financing activities | ||||||||||||
Net short-term borrowings (repayments) | (606.8 | ) | (248.0 | ) | 59.1 | |||||||
Long-term financing issuances | 1,502.6 | 1,694.7 | 2,381.3 | |||||||||
Long-term financing repayments | (750.3 | ) | (919.4 | ) | (761.9 | ) | ||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (670.2 | ) | (1,068.1 | ) | (2,023.4 | ) | ||||||
Common stock dividends | (297.4 | ) | (287.7 | ) | (280.7 | ) | ||||||
Other | 310.9 | 204.8 | 88.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash used for financing activities | (511.2 | ) | (623.7 | ) | (536.7 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and equivalents increase (decrease) | (87.7 | ) | (3.6 | ) | 2.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year | 418.1 | 421.7 | 419.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and equivalents at end of year | $ | 330.4 | $ | 418.1 | $ | 421.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures | ||||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 359.7 | $ | 446.9 | $ | 469.7 | ||||||
Income taxes paid | 572.2 | 773.8 | 854.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
|
Common stock
in treasury |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Unearned
ESOP compen- sation |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
Retained
earnings |
Deferred
hedging adjustment |
Foreign
currency translation |
Total
shareholders' equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1999 | 1,660.6 | $ | 16.6 | $ | 1,288.3 | $ | (133.3 | ) | $ | 15,562.8 | $ | | $ | (886.8 | ) | (309.8 | ) | $ | (6,208.5 | ) | $ | 9,639.1 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 1,977.3 | 1,977.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments (including taxes of $65.1) | (400.5 | ) | (400.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 1,576.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cash dividends ($.22 per share) | (280.7 | ) | (280.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP loan payment | 20.1 | 20.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (56.7 | ) | (2,002.2 | ) | (2,002.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity put option issuances and expirations, net | 25.5 | 25.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other (including tax benefits of $80.3) | 153.5 | (1.8 | ) | 10.8 | 74.1 | 225.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2000 | 1,660.6 | 16.6 | 1,441.8 | (115.0 | ) | 17,259.4 | | (1,287.3 | ) | (355.7 | ) | (8,111.1 | ) | 9,204.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 1,636.6 | 1,636.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments (including taxes of $65.7) | (412.2 | ) | (412.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
SFAS No. 133 transition adjustment (including tax benefits of $9.2) | (17.0 | ) | (17.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustmentscash flow hedges (including taxes of $1.4) | 7.7 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 1,215.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cash dividends ($.23 per share) | (287.7 | ) | (287.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP loan payment | 8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (36.1 | ) | (1,090.2 | ) | (1,090.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity put option issuances and expirations, net and forward contracts | 199.2 | 199.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other (including tax benefits of $70.0) | 149.4 | 0.3 | 11.9 | 89.9 | 239.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 | 1,660.6 | 16.6 | 1,591.2 | (106.7 | ) | 18,608.3 | (9.3 | ) | (1,699.5 | ) | (379.9 | ) | (8,912.2 | ) | 9,488.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 893.5 | 893.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments (including taxes of $150.5) | 106.7 | 106.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustmentscash flow hedges (including taxes of $3.5) | 0.8 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 1,001.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cash dividends ($.24 per share) | (297.4 | ) | (297.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP loan payment | 7.4 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (25.6 | ) | (686.9 | ) | (686.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity put option expirations and forward contracts settled | 500.8 | 500.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other (including tax benefits of $61.3) | 156.1 | 0.9 | 13.1 | 110.6 | 267.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 | 1,660.6 | $ | 16.6 | $ | 1,747.3 | $ | (98.4 | ) | $ | 19,204.4 | $ | (8.5 | ) | $ | (1,592.8 | ) | (392.4 | ) | $ | (8,987.7 | ) | $ | 10,280.9 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Company operates in the food service industry and primarily operates and franchises quick-service restaurant businesses under the McDonald's brand. The Company also operates other restaurant concepts under its Partner Brands: Boston Market, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Donatos Pizzeria. In addition, McDonald's has a minority ownership in Pret A Manger. In March 2002, the Company sold its Aroma Café business in the U.K.
All restaurants are operated by the Company, or under the terms of franchise arrangements, by franchisees who are independent entrepreneurs or by affiliates operating under joint-venture agreements between the Company and local business people.
CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Substantially all investments in affiliates owned 50% or less (primarily McDonald's Japan and Pret A Manger) are accounted for by the equity method.
ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Sales by Company-operated restaurants are recognized on a cash basis. Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants include continuing rent and service fees, initial fees and royalties received from foreign affiliates and developmental licensees. Continuing fees and royalties are recognized in the period earned. Initial fees are recognized upon opening of a restaurant, which is when the Company has performed substantially all initial services required by the franchise arrangement.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The functional currency of substantially all operations outside the U.S. is the respective local currency, except for a small number of countries with hyperinflationary economies, where the functional currency is the U.S. Dollar.
ADVERTISING COSTS
Production costs for radio and television advertising, primarily in the U.S., are expensed when the commercials are initially aired. Advertising expenses included in costs of Company-operated restaurants and in selling, general & administrative expenses were (in millions): 2002$647.6; 2001$600.9; 2000$595.3. In addition, significant advertising expenses are incurred by franchisees through advertising cooperatives in individual markets.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock options as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and discloses pro forma information, as provided by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation .
Pro forma net income and net income per common share were determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using an option pricing model. The model was designed to estimate the fair value of exchange-traded options that, unlike employee stock options, can be traded at any time and are fully transferable. In addition, such models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected volatility of the stock price. For pro forma disclosures, the options' estimated fair value was amortized over their vesting period. The following tables present the pro forma disclosures and the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these options.
Pro forma disclosures
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As reportednet income | $ | 893.5 | $ | 1,636.6 | $ | 1,977.3 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock option compensation expense
under fair value method, net of related tax effects |
(251.7 | ) | (210.0 | ) | (153.7 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Pro formanet income | $ | 641.8 | $ | 1,426.6 | $ | 1,823.6 | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||
As reportedbasic | $ | .70 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.49 | ||||
Pro formabasic | $ | .50 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.38 | ||||
As reporteddiluted |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
Pro formadiluted | $ | .50 | $ | 1.10 | $ | 1.36 | ||||
|
|
|
Assumptions
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expected dividend yield | .75 | % | .65 | % | .65 | % | ||||
Expected stock price volatility | 27.5 | % | 25.7 | % | 24.1 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate | 5.25 | % | 5.03 | % | 6.39 | % | ||||
Expected life of options IN YEARS | 7 | 7 | 7 | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value per option granted | $ | 10.88 | $ | 9.93 | $ | 14.08 |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost, with depreciation and amortization provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildingsup to 40 years; leasehold improvementsthe lesser of useful lives of assets or lease terms including option periods; and equipmentthree to 12 years.
28
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the net tangible assets of acquired restaurant businesses. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations , and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and includes guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets arising from business combinations. SFAS No. 142, effective January 1, 2002, eliminates the amortization of goodwill (and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives) and instead subjects it to annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Application of the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 in 2001 and 2000 would have increased net income by approximately $30 million ($0.02 per share) in each year.
The Company's goodwill primarily consists of amounts paid in excess of net tangible assets for (1) purchases of McDonald's restaurants from franchisees, (2) ownership percentage increases in international joint-ventures and (3) acquisitions of other businesses such as Partner Brands. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is generally assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. The Company has defined reporting units as each individual country for McDonald's restaurant business as well as each individual Partner Brand.
The annual goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit, generally based on discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured as the difference between the fair value of reporting unit goodwill and the carrying amount of goodwill.
The Company performed the initial required goodwill impairment test as of January 1, 2002 and recorded a noncash pretax charge of $116.2 million ($98.6 million after tax or $0.07 per diluted share) for the cumulative effect of this accounting change. The impaired goodwill resulted primarily from businesses in Argentina, Uruguay and other markets in Latin America and the Middle East, where economies have weakened significantly in recent years. In addition, the Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2002, which resulted in no significant charges.
The carrying amount of goodwill totaled $1,559.8 million and $1,320.4 million as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively (U.S.$676.3, $516.7; Europe$353.5, $278.6; Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa (APMEA)$211.0, $171.3; Latin America$97.3, $158.5; Canada$77.5, $51.2; and Partner Brands$144.2, $144.1). The changes in carrying amounts of goodwill from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002 were due to (1) the charge of $116.2 million for the cumulative effect of the accounting change, (2) goodwill generated in 2002 as a result of purchases of McDonald's restaurant businesses and (3) foreign currency rate fluctuations.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets , long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of annually reviewing McDonald's restaurant assets for potential impairment, assets are initially grouped together at a television market level in the U.S. and at a country level for each of the international markets. For Partner Brands, assets are grouped by each individual brand. If an indicator of impairment (e.g., negative operating cash flows for the most recent trailing twelve-month period) exists for any grouping of assets, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by each restaurant within the asset grouping is compared to its carrying value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value as determined by an estimate of discounted future cash flows.
Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when management has approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, and the assets are available for disposal. Generally, such losses relate to either restaurants that have closed and ceased operations or businesses or restaurants that are available for sale.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company generally borrows on a long-term basis and is exposed to the impact of interest-rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations. The Company uses foreign currency denominated debt and derivative instruments to manage the impact of these changes. The Company does not use derivatives with a level of complexity or with a risk higher than the exposures to be hedged and does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes.
The counterparties to these agreements consist of a diverse group of financial institutions. The Company continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of its counterparties, and adjusts positions as appropriate. The Company did not have significant exposure to any individual counterparty at December 31, 2002 and has master agreements that contain netting arrangements. Certain of these agreements also require each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. During 2002, certain counterparties were required to post collateral as aggregate exposures exceeded certain contractual limits due to increased values. At December 31, 2002, collateral in the amount of $2.2 million was posted by a counterparty while the Company was not required to collateralize any of its obligations.
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , as amended. SFAS No. 133 requires companies to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. SFAS No. 133 also requires companies to designate all derivatives that qualify as hedging instruments
29
as either fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. This designation is based upon the exposure being hedged.
The Company recorded a transition adjustment at January 1, 2001 related to cash flow hedges, which reduced accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity by $17.0 million, after tax. This adjustment was primarily related to interest-rate exchange agreements used to lock in long-term borrowing rates. The cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 133 at January 1, 2001 was not material to the Company's Consolidated statement of income.
All derivatives, primarily interest-rate exchange agreements and foreign currency exchange agreements, were classified in the Company's Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 as follows: miscellaneous other assets$133.9 million; other long-term liabilities (excluding accrued interest)$39.2 million; and accrued payroll and other liabilities$23.8 million.
Fair value hedges
The Company enters into fair value hedges to reduce the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability, or an identified portion thereof, which is attributable to a particular risk. The types of fair value hedges the Company enters into include: (1) interest-rate exchange agreements to convert a portion of its fixed-rate debt to floating-rate debt and (2) foreign currency exchange agreements for the exchange of various currencies and interest rates. The foreign currency exchange agreements are entered into to hedge the currency risk associated with debt and intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies, and essentially result in floating-rate assets or liabilities denominated in U.S. Dollars or appropriate functional currencies.
For fair value hedges, the gains or losses on derivatives as well as the offsetting gains or losses on the related hedged items are recognized in current earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, there was no significant impact to the Company's earnings related to the ineffective portion of fair value hedging instruments.
Cash flow hedges
The Company enters into cash flow hedges to mitigate the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to a particular risk. The types of cash flow hedges the Company enters into include: (1) interest-rate exchange agreements that effectively convert a portion of floating-rate debt to fixed-rate debt and are designed to reduce the impact of interest-rate changes on future interest expense, (2) forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency options that are designed to protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows such as royalties and other payments denominated in foreign currencies, and (3) foreign currency exchange agreements for the exchange of various currencies and interest rates. The foreign currency exchange agreements hedge the currency risk associated with debt and intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies, and essentially result in fixed-rate assets or liabilities denominated in U.S. Dollars or appropriate functional currencies.
For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gains or losses on derivatives is reported in the deferred hedging adjustment component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in earnings during the period of change. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, there was no significant impact to the Company's earnings related to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedging instruments.
The Company recorded net increases to the deferred hedging adjustment component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity of $0.8 million and $7.7 million, after tax, related to cash flow hedges during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Based on interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates at December 31, 2002, no significant amount of deferred hedging adjustments, after tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity at December 31, 2002 will be recognized in earnings in 2003 as the underlying hedged transactions are realized. The maximum maturity date of any cash flow hedge of forecasted transactions at December 31, 2002 was 12 months, excluding instruments hedging forecasted payments of variable interest on existing financial instruments that have various maturity dates through 2011.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency denominated debt to hedge its investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. Realized and unrealized translation adjustments from these hedges are included in shareholders' equity in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive income and offset translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, which also are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded a net decrease in translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income of $312.0 million after tax (included in the net increase of $106.7 million of translation adjustments in the Consolidated statement of shareholders' equity) related primarily to foreign currency denominated debt designated as hedges of net investments. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded a net increase in translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income of $168.5 million after tax related to hedges of net investments.
30
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities , which requires an enterprise to consolidate or make certain disclosures about variable interest entities that meet certain criteria, effective July 1, 2003. If it is reasonably possible that an enterprise will consolidate or disclose information about a variable interest entity on the effective date, the Interpretation requires certain information to be disclosed as of December 31, 2002.
The Company and six unaffiliated companies that supply the "McDonald's System" (McDonald's franchisees, suppliers and the Company) are equal owners of System Capital Corporation (SCC). The Company is currently performing an analysis to determine the applicability of FIN No. 46 to SCC. SCC's purpose is to provide funding to McDonald's franchisees, suppliers to the McDonald's System and McDonald's Corporation and to build equity within SCC that will benefit the McDonald's System. No employees of SCC are employees of the seven shareholders. SCC competes with other lenders who provide similar financing to McDonald's franchisees and suppliers. SCC's function is similar to that of a cooperative and its primary operating activities include (1) providing loans to qualifying U.S. franchisees to purchase existing restaurant businesses as well as finance equipment, buildings and working capital, (2) purchasing accounts receivable and financing inventory and other needs of eligible suppliers and distributors and (3) acquiring land and leasing it to McDonald's Corporation for new restaurants, primarily in the U.S.
The leases are generally for 20 years, provide for up to 20 additional years in renewal options and include an option for the Company to purchase some or all of the real estate subject to the lease at a price equal to SCC's acquisition cost. The Company's commitments under these leases are included in operating lease commitments on pages 20 and 34 and total approximately $14 million annually based on SCC's current cost of financing.
SCC funds its operations through borrowings by its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Funding Corp. (Golden Funding). Golden Funding had approximately $1.7 billion of commercial paper and medium-term notes outstanding at December 31, 2002. SCC assets included $900 million of loans to McDonald's franchisees, $500 million of land leased to the Company, and $300 million of loans to McDonald's suppliers.
Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch periodically review Golden Funding, including reviews of key performance indicators and asset quality. These rating agencies currently rate Golden Funding's commercial paper P-1, A-1 and F1 and its long-term debt Aa2, AA and AA, respectively. Credit support for Golden Funding's financing consists of: $14 million of cash reserves held by Golden Funding, $14 million of preferred shares (primarily supplier trade receivables purchased by SCC and contributed to Golden Funding), and a $30 million letter of credit issued jointly by a syndication of banks.
The Company's investment in SCC is accounted for on the cost basis.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations , effective January 1, 2003. The Statement requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the cost will be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset.
Application of the new rules, which for the Company relates to lease obligations in certain international markets, is expected to result in a cumulative effect of adoption in the first quarter 2003 that will reduce net income and shareholders' equity by approximately $30 million to $40 million. The adoption of the new rules is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's ongoing results of operations or financial position.
COMMON EQUITY PUT OPTIONS AND FORWARD CONTRACTS
During 2001 and 2000, the Company sold 12.2 million and 16.8 million common equity put options, respectively, in connection with its share repurchase program. Premiums received were recorded in shareholders' equity as a reduction of the cost of treasury stock purchased and were $31.8 million in 2001 and $56.0 million in 2000. In 2002, 10.1 million common equity put options were exercised and 2.1 million options expired unexercised, while 21.0 million options were exercised in 2001. The total amount paid to acquire these shares as a result of the options being exercised was $286 million in 2002 and $700 million in 2001. At December 31, 2002, there were no common equity put options outstanding. At December 31, 2001, the $350.0 million total exercise price of outstanding options was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury, net of premiums received.
During 2001, the Company also entered into equity forward contracts in connection with its share repurchase program. At December 31, 2001, the $150.8 million total purchase price of the forward contracts was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury. The forward contracts for 5.5 million shares settled in March 2002, and there were no forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2002.
SALES OF STOCK BY SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
As permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 51 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, when a subsidiary or affiliate sells unissued shares in a public offering, the Company records an adjustment to reflect an increase or decrease in the carrying value of its investment and a resulting nonoperating gain or loss.
31
PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION
Diluted net income per common share is calculated using net income divided by diluted weighted-average shares. Diluted weighted-average shares include weighted-average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of stock options was (in millions of shares): 20028.4; 200119.6; 200033.3. Stock options that were not included in diluted weighted-average shares because they would have been antidilutive were (in millions of shares): 2002148.0; 200183.1; 200049.2. The dilutive effect of common equity put options and forward contracts in 2001 and 2000 was not significant.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
The Company considers short-term, highly liquid investments to be cash equivalents. The impact of fluctuating foreign currencies on cash and equivalents was not material.
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses | $ | (113.6 | ) | $ | (112.4 | ) | $ | (86.9 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | (24.1 | ) | (62.7 | ) | (120.9 | ) | ||||||
Team service system payments | 21.6 | |||||||||||
Bad debts and other expense | 96.2 | 54.9 | 11.4 | |||||||||
Significant items: | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 266.9 | 200.0 | ||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 402.4 | 135.2 | ||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 183.9 | 42.4 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total significant items | 853.2 | 377.6 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | $ | 833.3 | $ | 257.4 | $ | (196.4 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
TEAM SERVICE SYSTEM PAYMENTS
In 2002, the Company made payments to U.S. owner/operators to facilitate the introduction of a new front counter team service system.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In 2002, the Company recorded $266.9 million of pretax charges ($243.6 million after tax) related to transferring ownership in four countries in the Middle East and Latin America, ceasing operations in three countries in Latin America, eliminating positions (approximately 600 positions, about half of which were in the U.S. and half of which were in international markets) and reallocating resources and consolidating certain home office facilities to control costs.
The 2002 charges consisted of: $136.8 million of asset write-offs and losses on the sale of assets and $64.6 million of costs for leases and other obligations in the markets restructured or exited, $55.9 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $14.7 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of certain home office facilities; and $9.9 million of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future. These charges were partially offset by a $15.0 million reversal of accrued restructuring costs recorded in 2001, primarily due to lower employee-related costs than originally estimated.
In 2001, the Company recorded $200.0 million of pretax charges ($136.1 million after tax) related to strategic changes and restaurant initiatives in the U.S. and certain international markets. The changes in the U.S. included streamlining operations by reducing the number of regions and divisions, enabling the Company to combine staff functions. In connection with these initiatives, the Company eliminated approximately 850 positions, consisting of 700 positions in the U.S., primarily in the divisions and regions, and 150 positions in international markets.
The 2001 charges consisted of: $114.4 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $68.8 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of region and division facilities, and $16.8 million of other cash costs, primarily consisting of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future.
RESTAURANT CLOSINGS/ASSET IMPAIRMENT
In 2002, the Company recorded $402.4 million of pretax charges ($335.8 million after tax) consisting of: $302.3 million related to management's decision to close 751 underperforming restaurants (234 were closed in 2002 and 517 will close throughout 2003) primarily in the U.S. and Japan, and $100.1 million primarily related to the impairment of assets for certain existing restaurants in Europe and Latin America.
In 2001, the Company recorded $135.2 million of pretax charges ($106.3 million after tax) consisting of: $91.2 million related to the closing of 163 underperforming restaurants in international markets in 2001, a $24.0 million asset impairment charge due to an assessment of the ongoing impact of Turkey's significant currency devaluation on our business, and $20.0 million related to the disposition of Aroma Café in the U.K.
TECHNOLOGY WRITE-OFFS AND OTHER CHARGES
In 2002, the Company recorded $183.9 million of pretax charges ($120.5 million after tax) consisting of: $170.0 million primarily related to the write-off of software development costs as a result of management's decision to terminate a long-term technology project, and $13.9 million primarily related to the write-off of receivables and inventory in Venezuela as a result of the temporary closure of all McDonald's restaurants due to the national strike that began in early December.
In 2001, the Company recorded $42.4 million of pretax charges ($29.1 million after tax) consisting of: $17.4 million primarily related to the write-off of certain technology, and $25.0 million primarily related to the unrecoverable costs incurred in connection with the theft of winning game pieces from the Company's Monopoly and certain other promotional games over an extended period of time, and the related termination of the supplier of the game pieces. Fifty individuals (none of whom were Company employees) were convicted of conspiracy and/or mail fraud charges.
32
The following table presents the activity included in accrued restructuring and restaurant closing costs in the Consolidated balance sheet.
|
2001 activity
|
|
2002 activity
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS
|
Liability at
December 31, 2001 |
Liability at
December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision
|
Cash
|
Noncash
|
Provision
|
Cash
|
Noncash
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-offs | $ | 10.0 | $ | (10.0 | ) | | $ | 141.7 | $ | (141.7 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Employee-related costs | 114.4 | $ | (34.6 | ) | $ | 79.8 | 40.9 | $ | (48.4 | ) | $ | 72.3 | ||||||||||||
Lease termination and other | 75.6 | (29.4 | ) | 46.2 | 84.3 | (27.2 | ) | 103.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
200.0 | (64.0 | ) | (10.0 | ) | 126.0 | 266.9 | (75.6 | ) | (141.7 | ) | 175.6 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-offs | 119.0 | (119.0 | ) | | 282.3 | (282.3 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Lease termination and other | 16.2 | (5.1 | ) | 11.1 | 120.1 | (2.8 | ) | 128.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
135.2 | (5.1 | ) | (119.0 | ) | 11.1 | 402.4 | (2.8 | ) | (282.3 | ) | 128.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-offs | 17.4 | (17.4 | ) | | 164.4 | (164.4 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Other | 25.0 | (17.9 | ) | 7.1 | 19.5 | (2.1 | ) | 24.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
42.4 | (17.9 | ) | (17.4 | ) | 7.1 | 183.9 | (2.1 | ) | (164.4 | ) | 24.5 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total accrued restructuring and restaurant closing costs | $ | 377.6 | $ | (87.0 | ) | $ | (146.4 | ) | $ | 144.2 | $ | 853.2 | $ | (80.5 | ) | $ | (588.4 | ) | $ | 328.5 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance is paid in installments over a period of up to one year after termination, and the remaining lease payments for closed facilities will generally be paid through 2020. No significant adjustments have been made to the original plans approved by management.
McDONALD'S JAPAN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO) GAIN
In 2001, McDonald's Japan, the Company's largest market in the APMEA segment, completed an IPO of 12 million shares. The Company owns 50% of McDonald's Japan, while the Company's founding partner Den Fujita and his family own approximately 26%. The Company recorded a $137.1 million gain (pre and after tax) in nonoperating income to reflect an increase in the carrying value of its investment as a result of the cash proceeds from the IPO received by McDonald's Japan.
FRANCHISE ARRANGEMENTS
Individual franchise arrangements generally include a lease and a license and provide for payment of initial fees, as well as continuing rent and service fees to the Company based upon a percent of sales with minimum rent payments. McDonald's franchisees are granted the right to operate a restaurant using the McDonald's system and, in certain cases, the use of a restaurant facility, generally for a period of 20 years. Franchisees pay related occupancy costs including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, franchisees outside the U.S. generally pay a refundable, noninterest-bearing security deposit. Foreign affiliates and developmental licensees pay a royalty to the Company based upon a percent of sales.
The results of operations of restaurant businesses purchased and sold in transactions with franchisees, affiliates and others were not material to the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to purchase and sale.
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants consisted of:
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum rents | $ | 1,479.9 | $ | 1,477.9 | $ | 1,465.3 | |||
Percent rent and service fees | 2,375.1 | 2,290.2 | 2,247.0 | ||||||
Initial fees | 51.1 | 61.2 | 63.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | $ | 3,906.1 | $ | 3,829.3 | $ | 3,776.0 | |||
|
|
|
Future minimum rent payments due to the Company under existing franchise arrangements are:
IN MILLIONS
|
Owned
sites |
Leased
sites |
Total
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | $ | 989.5 | $ | 745.6 | $ | 1,735.1 | |||
2004 | 972.8 | 734.3 | 1,707.1 | ||||||
2005 | 949.6 | 712.6 | 1,662.2 | ||||||
2006 | 922.6 | 690.4 | 1,613.0 | ||||||
2007 | 891.8 | 674.3 | 1,566.1 | ||||||
Thereafter | 7,367.7 | 5,758.9 | 13,126.6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Total minimum payments | $ | 12,094.0 | $ | 9,316.1 | $ | 21,410.1 | |||
|
|
|
At December 31, 2002, net property and equipment under franchise arrangements totaled $9.5 billion (including land of $2.8 billion) after deducting accumulated depreciation and amortization of $4.0 billion.
INCOME TAXES
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change, classified by source of income, was as follows:
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 876.3 | $ | 958.2 | $ | 1,280.6 | |||
Outside the U.S. | 785.8 | 1,371.5 | 1,601.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1,662.1 | $ | 2,329.7 | $ | 2,882.3 | |||
|
|
|
33
The provision for income taxes, classified by the timing and location of payment, was as follows:
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. federal | $ | 307.0 | $ | 357.3 | $ | 361.1 | |||||
U.S. state | 54.6 | 59.7 | 77.0 | ||||||||
Outside the U.S. | 353.0 | 363.7 | 406.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Current tax provision | 714.6 | 780.7 | 844.5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
U.S. federal | (47.4 | ) | 57.7 | 75.2 | |||||||
U.S. state | (7.6 | ) | 4.3 | 9.5 | |||||||
Outside the U.S. | 10.4 | (149.6 | ) | (24.2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Deferred tax provision (benefit)(1) | (44.6 | ) | (87.6 | ) | 60.5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 670.0 | $ | 693.1 | $ | 905.0 | |||||
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities consisted of:
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS
|
||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
|||||||
Property and equipment | $ | 1,316.3 | $ | 1,304.4 | ||||
Other | 448.4 | 429.9 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 1,764.7 | 1,734.3 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Intangible assets | (199.7 | ) | (207.9 | ) | ||||
Operating loss carryforwards | (186.1 | ) | (166.0 | ) | ||||
Employee benefit plans | (129.7 | ) | (137.2 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment | (89.4 | ) | (108.8 | ) | ||||
Capital loss carryforwards | (88.0 | ) | ||||||
Foreign tax credit carryforwards | (45.0 | ) | (21.6 | ) | ||||
Other | (450.9 | ) | (258.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance | (1,188.8 | ) | (899.9 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Valuation allowance | 322.1 | 180.1 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities(1) | $ | 898.0 | $ | 1,014.5 | ||||
|
|
The statutory U.S. federal income tax rate reconciles to the effective income tax rates as follows:
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | |
State income taxes, net of related federal income tax benefit | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | ||||
Benefits and taxes related to foreign operations(1) | (6.3 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (4.8 | ) | |
Significant items(2) | 8.7 | (1.6 | ) | ||||
Other, net | .7 | .8 | (.7 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|||||
Effective income tax rates | 40.3 | % | 29.8 | % | 31.4 | % | |
|
|
|
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis differences related to investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. These basis differences were approximately $3.2 billion at December 31, 2002 and consisted primarily of undistributed earnings considered permanently invested in the businesses. Determination of the deferred income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is not practicable because such liability, if any, is dependent on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs.
LEASING ARRANGEMENTS
At December 31, 2002, the Company was lessee at 6,871 restaurant locations through ground leases (the Company leases the land and the Company or franchisee owns the building) and at 7,823 restaurant locations through improved leases (the Company leases land and buildings). Lease terms for most restaurants are generally for 20 to 25 years and, in many cases, provide for rent escalations and renewal options, with certain leases providing purchase options. For most locations, the Company is obligated for the related occupancy costs including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, the Company is lessee under noncancelable leases covering certain offices and vehicles.
Future minimum payments required under existing operating leases with initial terms of one year or more are:
IN MILLIONS
|
Restaurant
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | $ | 829.6 | $ | 83.3 | $ | 912.9 | |||
2004 | 798.1 | 50.2 | 848.3 | ||||||
2005 | 746.1 | 42.4 | 788.5 | ||||||
2006 | 698.8 | 36.5 | 735.3 | ||||||
2007 | 652.3 | 30.5 | 682.8 | ||||||
Thereafter | 5,893.6 | 165.1 | 6,058.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Total minimum payments | $ | 9,618.5 | $ | 408.0 | $ | 10,026.5 | |||
|
|
|
Rent expense was (in millions): 2002$1,032.5; 2001$958.6; 2000$886.4. These amounts included percent rents in excess of minimum rents (in millions): 2002$131.3; 2001$119.6; 2000$133.0.
SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in the food service industry. Substantially all revenues result from the sale of menu products at restaurants operated by the Company, franchisees or affiliates. All intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in computing revenues and operating income. Operating income includes the Company's share of operating results of affiliates after interest expense and income taxes, except for U.S. affiliates, which are reported before income taxes. Royalties and other payments received from subsidiaries outside the U.S. were (in millions): 2002$644.1; 2001$607.7; 2000$603.6.
Corporate general & administrative expenses are included in the corporate segment of operating income and consist of home office support costs in areas such as facilities, finance, human resources, information technology, legal, supply chain management and training. Corporate assets include corporate cash and equivalents, asset portions of financing instruments, home office facilities and deferred tax assets.
34
IN MILLIONS
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 5,422.7 | $ | 5,395.6 | $ | 5,259.1 | ||||
Europe | 5,136.0 | 4,751.8 | 4,753.9 | |||||||
APMEA | 2,367.7 | 2,203.3 | 2,101.8 | |||||||
Latin America | 813.9 | 971.3 | 949.3 | |||||||
Canada | 633.6 | 608.1 | 615.1 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 1,031.8 | 939.9 | 563.8 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 15,405.7 | $ | 14,870.0 | $ | 14,243.0 | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
U.S. | $ | 1,673.3 | $ | 1,622.5 | $ | 1,795.7 | ||||
Europe | 1,021.8 | 1,063.2 | 1,180.1 | |||||||
APMEA | 64.3 | 325.0 | 451.2 | |||||||
Latin America | (133.4 | ) | 10.9 | 102.3 | ||||||
Canada | 125.4 | 123.7 | 126.3 | |||||||
Partner Brands | (66.8 | ) | (66.5 | ) | (41.5 | ) | ||||
Corporate | (571.7 | ) | (381.8 | ) | (284.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 2,112.9 | (1) | $ | 2,697.0 | (2) | $ | 3,329.7 | ||
|
|
|
||||||||
U.S. | $ | 8,687.4 | $ | 8,288.4 | $ | 7,856.9 | ||||
Europe | 8,310.6 | 7,139.1 | 7,083.7 | |||||||
APMEA | 3,332.0 | 3,144.5 | 2,983.4 | |||||||
Latin America | 1,425.3 | 1,898.3 | 1,855.6 | |||||||
Canada | 703.2 | 574.2 | 552.0 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 780.4 | 637.1 | 450.7 | |||||||
Corporate | 731.6 | 852.9 | 901.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,970.5 | $ | 22,534.5 | $ | 21,683.5 | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
U.S. | $ | 752.7 | $ | 552.3 | $ | 475.6 | ||||
Europe | 579.4 | 635.8 | 797.6 | |||||||
APMEA | 230.4 | 275.7 | 253.5 | |||||||
Latin America | 119.9 | 197.5 | 245.7 | |||||||
Canada | 111.6 | 80.4 | 52.5 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 190.4 | 153.3 | 79.6 | |||||||
Corporate | 19.4 | 11.2 | 40.6 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total capital expenditures | $ | 2,003.8 | $ | 1,906.2 | $ | 1,945.1 | ||||
|
|
|
||||||||
U.S. | $ | 383.4 | $ | 425.0 | $ | 402.6 | ||||
Europe | 334.9 | 313.7 | 296.5 | |||||||
APMEA | 141.7 | 133.2 | 129.8 | |||||||
Latin America | 59.6 | 79.3 | 69.4 | |||||||
Canada | 35.6 | 32.9 | 34.9 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 40.3 | 36.8 | 16.6 | |||||||
Corporate | 55.3 | 65.4 | 60.9 | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 1,050.8 | $ | 1,086.3 | $ | 1,010.7 | ||||
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, were (in millions)Consolidated: 2002$21,976.6; 2001$20,355.3; 2000$19,798.3. U.S. based: 2002$9,254.3; 2001$8,670.4; 2000$8,373.2.
DEBT FINANCING
LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS
At December 31, 2002, the Company had several line of credit agreements with various banks totaling $1.3 billion, all of which remained unused at year-end 2002. Subsequent to year end, the Company renegotiated the line of credit agreements as follows: $810.0 million of lines expiring in 2004 with a term of 364 days and fees based on current credit ratings of .05% per annum on the total commitment, with a feature that allows the Company to convert the borrowings to a one-year loan at expiration; a $500.0 million line expiring in 2008 with fees based on current credit ratings of .07% per annum on the total commitment; and a $25.0 million line expiring in 2003 with a term of 364 days and fees of .07% per annum on the total commitment. Fees and interest rates on these lines are based on the Company's long-term credit rating assigned by Moody's and Standard & Poor's. Under terms of these agreements, the Company is required to maintain a minimum net worth (defined as consolidated assets less consolidated liabilities) of $5 billion. In addition, certain subsidiaries outside the U.S. had unused lines of credit totaling $1.1 billion at December 31, 2002; these were principally short-term and denominated in various currencies at local market rates of interest.
The weighted-average interest rate of short-term borrowings, consisting of commercial paper and foreign currency bank line borrowings, was 3.4% at both December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
FAIR VALUES
At December 31, 2002, the fair value of the Company's debt and notes payable obligations was estimated at $10.5 billion compared to a carrying amount of $10.0 billion. This fair value was estimated using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporated quoted market prices. The Company has no current plans to retire a significant amount of its debt prior to maturity.
The carrying amounts for both cash and equivalents and notes receivable approximate fair value. Foreign currency and interest-rate exchange agreements, foreign currency options and forward foreign exchange contracts were recorded in the Consolidated balance sheet at fair value using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporated quoted market prices. No fair value was estimated for noninterest-bearing security deposits by franchisees, because these deposits are an integral part of the overall franchise arrangements.
ESOP LOANS AND OTHER GUARANTEES
At December 31, 2002, the Company has guaranteed and included in total debt $22.6 million of Notes issued by the Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) with payments through 2006. Borrowings related to the ESOP at December 31, 2002, which include $85.9 million of loans from the Company to the ESOP and the $22.6 million of Notes guaranteed by the Company, are reflected as long-term debt with a corresponding reduction of shareholders' equity (unearned ESOP compensation). The ESOP is repaying the loans and interest through 2018 using Company contributions and dividends from its McDonald's common stock holdings. As the principal amount of the borrowings is repaid, the debt and the unearned ESOP compensation are being reduced.
35
The Company also has guaranteed certain affiliate and other loans totaling $102.0 million at December 31, 2002. These guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company generally to support borrowing arrangements of certain U.S. partnerships and franchisees, and certain affiliates. The terms of the guarantees vary and are equal to the remaining term of the related debt. At December 31, 2002, there was no carrying value for obligations under these guarantees in the Company's Consolidated balance sheet.
DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The Company has incurred debt obligations principally through public and private offerings and bank loans. There are no provisions in the Company's debt obligations that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings. Certain of the Company's debt obligations contain cross-acceleration provisions and restrictions on Company and subsidiary mortgages and the long-term debt of certain subsidiaries. Under certain agreements, the Company has the option to retire debt prior to maturity, either at par or at a premium over par.
The following table summarizes the Company's debt obligations (the interest rates reflected in the table include the effects of interest-rate and foreign currency exchange agreements).
|
|
Interest rates(1)
December 31 |
Amounts outstanding
December 31 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS
|
Maturity
dates |
|||||||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
|||||||||||
Fixed-original issue(2) | 5.2 | % | 6.2 | % | $ | 3,659.4 | $ | 3,293.8 | ||||||
Fixed-converted via exchange agreements(3) | 5.2 | 5.3 | (995.4 | ) | (1,829.9 | ) | ||||||||
Floating | 1.3 | 2.3 | 793.1 | 2,364.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total U.S. Dollars | 2003-2033 | 3,457.1 | 3,828.7 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed | 5.5 | 5.7 | 677.8 | 629.7 | ||||||||||
Floating | 3.1 | 3.5 | 1,954.7 | 1,724.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Euro | 2003-2012 | 2,632.5 | 2,354.6 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed | 6.2 | 6.1 | 1,152.6 | 698.8 | ||||||||||
Floating | 5.5 | 5.6 | 186.1 | 150.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total British Pounds Sterling | 2003-2032 | 1,338.7 | 849.1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed | 6.2 | 4.5 | 156.0 | 276.9 | ||||||||||
Floating | 1.9 | 6.2 | 237.3 | 58.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other European currencies(4) | 2003-2007 | 393.3 | 335.8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed | 1.9 | 2.3 | 900.4 | 584.0 | ||||||||||
Floating | 0.1 | 227.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Japanese Yen | 2003-2030 | 900.4 | 811.9 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed | 7.2 | 7.1 | 455.8 | 317.6 | ||||||||||
Floating | 4.8 | 6.2 | 415.7 | 300.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other Asia/Pacific currencies(5) | 2003-2008 | 871.5 | 617.6 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed | 4.8 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||
Floating | 3.2 | 15.5 | 17.9 | 23.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other currencies | 2003-2016 | 21.1 | 26.4 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Debt obligations before fair value adjustments(6) | 9,614.6 | 8,824.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments(7) | 364.8 | 93.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total debt obligations(8) | $ | 9,979.4 | $ | 8,918.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Net property and equipment consisted of:
|
December 31,
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS
|
|||||||
2002
|
2001
|
||||||
Land | $ | 4,169.6 | $ | 3,975.6 | |||
Buildings and improvements on owned land | 8,747.2 | 8,127.0 | |||||
Buildings and improvements on leased land | 8,872.5 | 8,020.2 | |||||
Equipment, signs and seating | 3,765.1 | 3,371.7 | |||||
Other | 664.2 | 611.5 | |||||
|
|
||||||
26,218.6 | 24,106.0 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (7,635.2 | ) | (6,816.5 | ) | |||
|
|
||||||
Net property and equipment | $ | 18,583.4 | $ | 17,289.5 | |||
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was (in millions): 2002$971.1; 2001$945.6; 2000$900.9.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company's Profit Sharing and Savings Plan for U.S.-based employees includes profit sharing, 401(k) and leveraged employee stock ownership (ESOP) features. The 401(k) feature allows participants to make pretax contributions that are partly matched from shares released under the ESOP. McDonald's executives, staff and restaurant managers participate in additional ESOP allocations and profit sharing contributions, based on their compensation. The profit sharing contribution is discretionary, and the Company determines the amount each year.
36
Participant 401(k) contributions, the Company's matching contributions, profit sharing contributions and any related earnings can be invested in McDonald's common stock or among several other investment alternatives. ESOP allocations are generally invested in McDonald's common stock.
In addition, the Company maintains a nonqualified, unfunded Supplemental Plan that allows participants to make tax-deferred contributions and receive Company-provided allocations that cannot be made under the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan because of Internal Revenue Service limitations. The investment alternatives and returns in the Supplemental Plan are based on certain of the investment alternatives under the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Total liabilities under the Supplemental Plan were $297.3 million at December 31, 2002 and $301.1 million at December 31, 2001 and were included in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has entered into derivative contracts to hedge changes in the Supplemental Plan liabilities. At December 31, 2002, derivatives with a fair value of $34.5 million indexed to the Company's stock and $38.4 million indexed to certain market indices were included in miscellaneous other assets in the Consolidated balance sheet. All changes in Plan liabilities and in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in selling, general & administrative expenses. Changes in fair value of the derivatives indexed to the Company's stock are recorded in the Consolidated statement of income because the contracts provide the counterparty with a choice of cash settlement or settlement in shares.
Total U.S. costs for the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, including nonqualified benefits and related hedging activities, were (in millions): 2002$50.1; 2001$54.6; 2000$49.6.
Certain subsidiaries outside the U.S. also offer profit sharing, stock purchase or other similar benefit plans. Total plan costs outside the U.S. were (in millions): 2002$36.8; 2001$39.7; 2000$38.1.
Other postretirement benefits and postemployment benefits, excluding severance benefits related to the 2002 and 2001 restructuring charges, were immaterial.
STOCK OPTIONS
At December 31, 2002, the Company had five stock-based compensation plans for employees and nonemployee directors. Options to purchase common stock are granted at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Therefore, no compensation cost has been recognized in the Consolidated statement of income for these plans.
Substantially all of the options become exercisable in four equal installments, beginning a year from the date of the grant, and expire 10 years from the grant date. In 2001, the Board of Directors approved a three-year extension to the term of 44.2 million options granted between May 1, 1999 and December 31, 2000 with an exercise price greater than $28.90. Because the market value of the stock was less than the exercise price of the options at the time of extension, no compensation expense was required to be recorded.
Also in 2001, the Board of Directors approved a special grant of 11.9 million options at a price of $28.90 as an incentive to meet an operating income performance goal for calendar year 2003. The options vest on January 31, 2004, and if the performance goal is met, the options will retain their original 10-year term; otherwise, they will expire on June 30, 2004. The Company does not expect to meet this performance goal.
At December 31, 2002, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plans was 231.9 million, including 33.0 million available for future grants. A summary of the status of the Company's plans as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and changes during the years then ended, is presented in the following table.
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Options
|
Shares
IN MILLIONS |
Weighted-
average exercise price |
Shares
IN MILLIONS |
Weighted-
average exercise price |
Shares
IN MILLIONS |
Weighted-
average exercise price |
|||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 192.9 | $ | 26.65 | 175.8 | $ | 25.34 | 164.7 | $ | 23.06 | ||||||
Granted(1) | 26.3 | 28.26 | 38.6 | 29.37 | 26.5 | 35.16 | |||||||||
Exercised | (13.1 | ) | 14.91 | (11.9 | ) | 13.70 | (10.8 | ) | 13.68 | ||||||
Forfeited | (7.2 | ) | 29.22 | (9.6 | ) | 29.03 | (4.6 | ) | 27.81 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year | 198.9 | $ | 27.57 | 192.9 | $ | 26.65 | 175.8 | $ | 25.34 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year | 110.9 | 98.2 | 79.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted each year were 2.1%, 3.0% and 2.0% of weighted-average common shares outstanding for 2002, 2001 and 2000, representing grants to approximately 13,900, 15,100, and 14,100 employees in those three years.
The following table presents information related to options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 2002, based on ranges of exercise prices.
December 31, 2002
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
Options exercisable
|
||||||||||
Range
of exercise prices |
Number
of options IN MILLIONS |
Weighted-
average remaining contractual life IN YEARS |
Weighted-
average exercise price |
Number
of options IN MILLIONS |
Weighted-
average exercise price |
||||||||
$ | 12 to 22 | 31.9 | 1.9 | $ | 15.46 | 30.6 | $ | 15.30 | |||||
23 to 27 | 62.8 | 4.5 | 24.94 | 42.3 | 24.75 | ||||||||
28 to 34 | 59.5 | 7.4 | 29.11 | 8.1 | 29.59 | ||||||||
35 to 46 | 44.7 | 9.6 | 37.85 | 29.9 | 38.28 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 12 to 46 | 198.9 | 6.1 | $ | 27.57 | 110.9 | $ | 26.14 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
37
QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Quarters ended
December 31 |
Quarters ended
September 30 |
Quarters ended
June 30 |
Quarters ended
March 31 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales by Company-operated restaurants | $ | 2,932.8 | $ | 2,811.4 | $ | 3,019.3 | $ | 2,876.9 | $ | 2,869.0 | $ | 2,738.2 | $ | 2,678.5 | $ | 2,614.2 | |||||||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | 966.4 | 960.1 | 1,027.7 | 1,002.4 | 993.1 | 969.3 | 918.9 | 897.5 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 3,899.2 | 3,771.5 | 4,047.0 | 3,879.3 | 3,862.1 | 3,707.5 | 3,597.4 | 3,511.7 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Company-operated margin | 374.5 | 383.5 | 434.5 | 436.1 | 415.1 | 396.6 | 368.9 | 370.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Franchised margin | 749.2 | 758.1 | 813.5 | 799.0 | 787.1 | 771.4 | 716.2 | 700.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (203.4 | )(1) | 482.7 | (2) | 829.8 | 746.6 | (3) | 845.2 | 772.5 | (4) | 641.3 | (5) | 695.2 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (343.8 | )(1) | $ | 271.9 | (2) | $ | 486.7 | $ | 545.5 | (6) | $ | 497.5 | $ | 440.9 | (4) | $ | 351.7 | (5) | $ | 378.3 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (98.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (343.8 | )(1) | $ | 271.9 | (2) | $ | 486.7 | $ | 545.5 | (6) | $ | 497.5 | $ | 440.9 | (4) | $ | 253.1 | (5) | $ | 378.3 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Per common sharebasic: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .28 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.08 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .20 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Per common sharediluted: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .27 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.07 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .20 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share | $ | .235 | $ | .225 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average sharesbasic | 1,268.8 | 1,282.7 | 1,273.1 | 1,286.1 | 1,273.2 | 1,289.7 | 1,277.2 | 1,300.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average sharesdiluted | 1,268.8 | 1,299.3 | 1,280.5 | 1,305.8 | 1,290.6 | 1,311.1 | 1,292.7 | 1,325.3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Systemwide sales(7) | $ | 10,489.5 | $ | 10,112.7 | $ | 10,908.1 | $ | 10,629.2 | $ | 10,429.9 | $ | 10,238.8 | $ | 9,698.5 | $ | 9,649.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Market price per common share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
High | $ | 19.95 | $ | 30.10 | $ | 28.62 | $ | 31.00 | $ | 30.72 | $ | 30.96 | $ | 29.06 | $ | 35.06 | |||||||||
Low | 15.17 | 25.00 | 17.42 | 26.00 | 27.00 | 25.39 | 25.38 | 24.75 | |||||||||||||||||
Close | 16.08 | 26.47 | 17.66 | 27.14 | 28.45 | 27.06 | 27.75 | 26.55 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT
Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements. The financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and include certain amounts based on management's judgment and best estimates. Other financial information presented is consistent with the financial statements.
The Company maintains a system of internal controls over financial reporting including safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition, which is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation of reliable published financial statements and asset safeguarding. The system includes a documented organizational structure and appropriate division of responsibilities; established policies and procedures that are communicated throughout the Company; careful selection, training, and development of our people; and utilization of an internal audit program. Policies and procedures prescribe that the Company and all employees are to maintain high standards of proper business practices throughout the world.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and safeguarding of assets. Furthermore, the effectiveness of an internal control system can change with circumstances. The Company believes that it maintains an effective system of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, who were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data. The audit report of Ernst & Young LLP is presented herein.
The Board of Directors, operating through its Audit Committee composed entirely of independent Directors, provides oversight to the financial reporting process. Ernst & Young LLP has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and regularly meets with the Committee to discuss accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters.
McDONALD'S
CORPORATION
January 23, 2003
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
McDonald's Corporation
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated balance sheets of McDonald's Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related Consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of McDonald's Corporation management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the U.S. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of McDonald's Corporation at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.
As discussed in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method for accounting for goodwill to conform with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . Effective January 1, 2001, the Company changed its method for accounting for derivative financial instruments to conform with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities .
ERNST &
YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 23, 2003
39
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information regarding directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Information regarding all of the Company's executive officers is included in Part I, Item 4, page 5 of this Form 10-K.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Part IV
Item 14. CONTROL AND PROCEDURES
Within the 90-day period prior to the filing of this report, an evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Such officers also confirm that there have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to above.
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Consolidated financial statements filed as part of this report are listed under Part II, Item 8, pages 24 through 27 of this Form 10-K.
No schedules are required because either the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
The following reports on Form 8-K were filed for the last quarter covered by this report, and subsequently up to March 12, 2003.
Date of report
|
Item number
|
Financial statements
required to be filed |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
12/05/2002 | Item 5 and 7 | No | ||
12/17/2002 | Item 5 and 7 | No | ||
1/23/2003 | Item 5 and 7 | No | ||
2/12/2003 | Item 9 | No |
The exhibits listed in the accompanying index are filed as part of this report.
40
McDonald's Corporation exhibit index (Item 15)
41
(10) |
|
Material Contracts |
||||
|
|
(a) |
|
Directors' Stock Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.* |
||
|
|
(b) |
|
Profit Sharing Program, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 1999.* |
||
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
First Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.* |
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
Second Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.* |
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
Third Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.* |
|
|
|
|
(iv) |
|
Fourth Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.* |
|
|
(c) |
|
McDonald's Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.* |
||
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
First Amendment to McDonald's Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, filed herewith.* |
|
|
(d) |
|
1975 Stock Ownership Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.* |
||
|
|
(e) |
|
1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.* |
||
|
|
(f) |
|
1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.* |
||
|
|
(g) |
|
Executive Retention Plan, as amended and restated December 18, 2002, filed herewith.* |
||
|
|
(h) |
|
Senior Director Letter Agreement between Gordon C. Gray and the Company, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
||
|
|
(i) |
|
Senior Director Letter Agreement between Donald R. Keough and the Company, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
||
|
|
(j) |
|
McDonald's Corporation 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.* |
||
|
|
(k) |
|
Form of McDonald's Corporation Tier I Change of Control Employment Agreement authorized by the Board of Directors and expected to be entered into between the Company and certain key executives, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.* |
||
(12) |
|
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
||||
(21) |
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant |
||||
(23) |
|
Consent of independent auditors |
||||
(99.1) |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
||||
(99.2) |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
42
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
McDonald's Corporation
(Registrant) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew H. Paull |
By |
Matthew H. Paull
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003 Date |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in their capacities indicated below on the 12th day of March, 2003:
Signature, Title
/s/ Hall Adams, Jr.
|
/s/ Andrew J. McKenna
|
|||||
By |
Hall Adams, Jr.
Director |
By |
Andrew J. McKenna
Director |
|||
|
|
/s/ Charles H. Bell |
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew H. Paull |
By |
Charles H. Bell
President and Chief Operating Officer and Director |
By |
Matthew H. Paull
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||
|
|
/s/ Edward A. Brennan |
|
|
|
/s/ David M. Pojman |
By |
Edward A. Brennan
Director |
By |
David M. Pojman
Corporate Senior Vice PresidentController |
|||
|
|
/s/ James R. Cantalupo |
|
|
|
/s/ Terry L. Savage |
By |
James R. Cantalupo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director |
By |
Terry L. Savage
Director |
|||
|
|
/s/ Enrique Hernandez, Jr. |
|
|
|
/s/ Roger W. Stone |
By |
Enrique Hernandez, Jr.
Director |
By |
Roger W. Stone
Director |
|||
|
|
/s/ Jeanne P. Jackson |
|
|
|
/s/ Robert N. Thurston |
By |
Jeanne P. Jackson
Director |
By |
Robert N. Thurston
Director |
|||
|
|
/s/ Donald G. Lubin |
|
|
|
/s/ Fred L. Turner |
By |
Donald G. Lubin
Director |
By |
Fred L. Turner
Senior Chairman and Director |
|||
|
|
/s/ Walter E. Massey |
|
|
|
|
By |
Walter E. Massey
Director |
43
I, James R. Cantalupo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of McDonald's Corporation, certify that:
Date: March 12, 2003
/s/ James R. Cantalupo
|
||||
By |
James R. Cantalupo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
44
Certifications (continued)
I, Matthew H. Paull, Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of McDonald's Corporation, certify that:
Date: March 12, 2003
/s/ Matthew H. Paull
|
||||
By |
Matthew H. Paull
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
45
Exhibit 10(c)(i). FIRST AMENDMENT TO McDONALD'S CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL PROFIT SHARING AND SAVINGS PLAN
The McDonald's Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2002, by adding new Sections 11 and 12, reading in their entirety as follows:
46
Exhibit 10(g). EXECUTIVE RETENTION PLAN
As amended and restated December 18, 2002
INTRODUCTION | |||
McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), has established the Executive Retention Plan (this "Plan") effective as of October 1, 1998 (the "Effective Date"). This Plan was amended and restated on March 20, 2001, March 20, 2002, October 29, 2002 and December 18, 2002. The amendments made to this Plan by the amendment and restatement of October 29, 2002 are not applicable to any Executive (as defined in the Plan before October 29, 2002) whose termination of employment or Change-in-Status Date (as defined in the Plan before October 29, 2002) occurred before October 29, 2002, for whom the Plan provisions as in effect on the date of his or her termination of employment or Change-in-Status Date, as applicable, shall control. |
|||
ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE; EMPLOYMENT PERIODS GENERALLY |
|||
1.01 |
Purpose. It is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to assure that the Company has the continued dedication of its key executives in a highly competitive global marketplace. This Plan is established to promote the retention of these key executives and provide the Company with a smooth succession process. This Plan is also intended to provide these key executives with incentives that are designed to focus their energy on contributing to the ultimate success of the Company. |
||
1.02 |
Employment Periods. |
||
|
(a) |
Definition of Employment Periods. This Plan provides for the continued employment, subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, of the individuals identified on Appendix A as "Tier I Executives," "Tier II Executives" and "Tier III Executives" (collectively, the "Executives") during three successive periods, each of which is defined below: the Retention Period; the Transition Period; and the Continued Employment Period (collectively referred to as the "Employment Periods"). |
|
|
(b) |
Requirement of Execution of Agreement and Continued Employment. In order to be eligible for continued employment during each successive Employment Period, with the pay and benefits set forth herein, an Executive must satisfy the requirements summarized in this Section 1.02(b) and more fully set forth below in the Plan. The Executive must properly execute the following agreements (each, an "Agreement") at the following times: (i) on or before the Executive's Change in Status Date, an Agreement substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit A (a "Transition Period Agreement"); (ii) on or before the first day of the Executive's Continued Employment Period, an Agreement substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit B (a "Continued Employment Period Agreement"); and (iii) upon a termination of the Executive's employment at the end of the Continued Employment Period or under circumstances described in Section 7.01 below, an Agreement substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit C (a "Termination Agreement"). In addition, the Executive must not revoke, and must comply with, such Agreements. Finally, the Executive must otherwise comply with the requirements of this Plan. An Executive may also be eligible in some cases for certain pay and benefits upon termination of his or her employment, as more fully set forth in Articles 6 and 7 below (the "Termination Benefits"). Exhibit B to each Agreement shall be completed by the Company at the time of the Agreement's preparation by the insertion of a list of the "Specified Competitors," consisting of twenty-five (25) competitors of McDonald's determined by the Company in its sole discretion. |
|
|
(c) |
Violations by the Executive. If an Executive commits a "Violation" (as defined below), the Company shall be entitled to cancel any and all future obligations of the Company to the Executive under this Plan and recoup the value of all Relevant Prior Benefits (as defined below), together with the Company's costs and reasonable attorney's fees. In addition, the Company shall be entitled to pursue any other remedy available to enforce the terms of the Executive's Agreements. A "Violation" shall have occurred if an Executive (i) files a lawsuit, charge, complaint or other claim asserting any claim or demand within the scope of the releases given in any of his or her Agreements, (ii) fails properly to execute and deliver a required Agreement, or (iii) purports to revoke any of his or her Agreements The "Relevant Prior Benefits" means (i) in the case of a Violation committed by an Executive during an Employment Period, all payments and benefits that have been provided to the Executive under this Plan during that Employment Period, and (ii) in the case of a Violation committed by an Executive after termination of the Executive's employment, all Termination Benefits provided to the Executive under the Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
(d) |
Status and Benefits Generally during Employment Periods. During an Executive's continued employment during each of his or her Employment Periods, except as otherwise specifically provided in this Plan: (i) the Executive shall be entitled to participate in the Company's employee compensation plans, practices, policies and programs as in effect from time to time, including without limitation all equity compensation, bonus and other incentive compensation plans, policies and programs (collectively, the "Compensation Plans"), to the extent that the Executive is eligible under, and in accordance with, the applicable terms and conditions thereof as modified by this Plan; and (ii) the Executive shall be entitled to participate in the Company's employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs as in effect from time to time (collectively, the "Employee Plans"), to the extent that the Executive is eligible under, and in accordance with, the applicable terms and conditions thereof. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as specifically provided in Section 7.01(b) below, during an Executive's Employment Periods and upon and following the termination of his or her employment for any reason, the Executive's stock options shall continue to vest, be exercisable, expire and otherwise be subject to the express terms of the related stock option plan and the applicable Golden M Certificate (or other applicable award agreement). |
|
|
(e) |
Deferred Compensation Plans. Without limiting the generality of Section 1.02(d) above, except as specifically provided in Section 4.02(b) below, amounts paid to an Executive during the Executive's Employment Periods shall be treated as "compensation" for purposes of the McDonald's Corporation Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, McDonald's Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan and any successor or other deferred compensation plans for which the Executive may be eligible (collectively, the "Deferred Compensation Plans") and all life insurance benefit plans sponsored by McDonald's Corporation, in each case to the extent permitted by the terms of such plans as in effect from time to time. No requirement that the Company make payments under this Plan to an Executive shall be considered violated by the Company's crediting all or any portion thereof to the Executive's account under any Deferred Compensation Plan in which the Executive is eligible to participate, to the extent that the Executive has elected to defer such payment under the terms of such Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
ARTICLE 2. PLAN ADMINISTRATION |
|||
2.01 |
The Committee. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board"), as such committee is constituted from time to time (the "Committee"), shall have overall responsibility for the establishment, amendment, administration and operation of this Plan. The Committee shall have the responsibilities and duties and powers under this Plan which are not specifically delegated to anyone else, including without limitation the following powers: |
||
|
(i) |
subject to any limitations under this Plan or applicable law, to make and enforce such rules and regulations of this Plan and prescribe the use of such forms as it shall deem necessary for the efficient administration of this Plan; |
|
|
(ii) |
to require any person to furnish such information as it may reasonably request as a condition to receiving any benefit under this Plan; |
|
|
(iii) |
to decide on questions concerning this Plan; |
|
|
(iv) |
to amend Appendix A hereto to add additional Executives, to delete Executives whose employment has terminated without the right to receive any additional benefits under this Plan or whose rights hereunder have been satisfied in full, and to reflect any changes that are agreed with the affected Executives; |
|
|
(v) |
to compute or cause to be computed the amount of benefits which shall be payable to any person in accordance with the provisions of this Plan; and |
|
|
(vi) |
to appoint and remove, as it deems advisable, the Plan Administrator. |
|
2.02 |
The Plan Administrator. The Committee may appoint a Plan Administrator who may (but need not) be a member of the Committee, and in the absence of such appointment, the Committee shall be the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator shall perform the administrative responsibilities delegated to the Plan Administrator from time to time by the Committee. |
||
2.03 |
Discretionary Power of the Committee. The Committee from time to time may establish rules for the administration of this Plan. The Committee shall have the sole discretion to make decisions and take any action with respect to questions arising in connection with this Plan, including without limitation the construction and interpretation of this Plan and the determination of eligibility for and the amount of benefits under this Plan. The decisions or actions of the Committee as to any questions arising in connection with this Plan, including without limitation the construction and interpretation of this Plan, shall be final and binding upon all Executives and their respective beneficiaries. |
||
|
|
|
|
48
2.04 |
Action of the Committee. The Committee may act at a meeting, including without limitation a telephonic meeting, by the consent of a majority of the members of the Committee at the time in office, or without a meeting, by the unanimous written consent of the individual members of the Committee. An executed document signed by an individual member of the Committee and transmitted by facsimile shall be valid as the original signed document for all purposes. Any person dealing with the Committee shall be entitled to rely upon a certificate of any member of the Committee, or the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Company, as to any act or determination of the Committee. |
||
2.05 |
Advisors and Agents of the Committee. The Committee may, subject to periodic review, (a) authorize one or more of its members or an agent to execute or deliver any instrument, and make any payment on its behalf, and (b) utilize the services of associates and engage accountants, agents, legal counsel, record keepers, professional consultants (any of whom may also be serving the Company) or authorized Company personnel to assist in the administration of this Plan or to render advice with regard to any responsibility or issue arising under this Plan. |
||
2.06 |
Records and Reports of the Committee. The Committee shall maintain records and accounts relating to the administration of this Plan. An Executive shall be entitled to review any records relating to his or her individual participation in this Plan and to make copies of such records upon written request to the Committee. |
||
2.07 |
Liability of the Committee; Indemnification. The members of the Committee and the Plan Administrator shall have no liability with respect to any action or omission made by them in good faith nor from any action or omission made in reliance upon (a) the advice or opinion of any accountant, legal counsel, medical adviser or other professional consultant or (b) any resolutions of the Committee or the Board certified by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company. Each member of the Committee and the Plan Administrator shall be indemnified, defended and held harmless by the Company and its respective successors against all claims, liabilities, fines and penalties and all expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements and other professional costs incurred in enforcing this provision) reasonably incurred by or imposed upon such individual which arise as a result of his or her actions or failure to act in connection with the operation and administration of this Plan, to the extent lawfully allowable and to the extent that such claim, liability, fine, penalty or expense is not paid for by liability insurance purchased by or paid for by the Company or an affiliate thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not indemnify any person for any such amount incurred through any settlement or compromise of any action unless the Company consents in writing to such settlement or compromise, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. |
||
2.08 |
Plan Expenses. All expenses under or relating to this Plan shall be paid from the general assets of the Company. To the extent required by applicable law, the Company may require any member of the Committee to furnish a fidelity bond satisfactory to the Company. |
||
2.09 |
Service in More than One Capacity. Any person or group of persons may serve this Plan in more than one capacity. |
||
2.10 |
Named Fiduciary. The named fiduciary of this Plan shall be the Committee. |
||
2.11 |
Delegation of Responsibility. The Committee shall have the authority to delegate from time to time, in writing, all or any part of its responsibilities under this Plan to one or more members of the Committee. The Committee may also delegate administrative functions to the Plan Administrator pursuant to Section 2.02 above. The Committee may in the same manner revise or revoke any such delegation of responsibility. Any action of the delegate in the exercise of such delegated responsibilities shall have the same force and effect for all purposes hereunder as if such action had been taken by the Committee. The Committee shall not be liable for any acts or omissions of any such delegate. The delegate shall periodically report to the Committee concerning the discharge of the delegated responsibilities. |
||
2.12 |
Filing a Claim. |
||
|
(a) |
Each individual eligible for benefits under this Plan ("Claimant") may submit a claim for benefits ("Claim") to the Plan Administrator in writing on a form provided or approved by the Plan Administrator or, if no such form has been so provided or approved, in a written document that specifies, in reasonable detail, facts and circumstances and the applicable Plan provisions which the Claimant believes entitle him or her to compensation or benefits under this Plan. A Claimant shall have no right to seek review of a denial of benefits, or to bring any action in any court to enforce a Claim, prior to his or her filing a Claim and exhausting his or her rights to review under this Article 2. |
|
|
(b) |
When a Claim has been filed properly, it shall be evaluated and the Claimant shall be notified of the approval or the denial of the Claim within 45 days after the receipt of such Claim unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing the Claim. If such an extension is required, written notice of the extension shall be furnished to the Claimant prior to the end of the initial 45-day period, which notice shall specify the special circumstances requiring an extension and the date by which a final decision will be reached (which date shall not be later than 90 days after the date on which the Claim was filed). A Claimant shall be given a written notice in which the |
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Claimant shall be advised as to whether the Claim is granted or denied, in whole or in part. If a Claim is denied, in whole or in part, the notice shall contain (i) the specific reasons for the denial, (ii) references to pertinent Plan provisions upon which the denial is based, (iii) a description of any additional material or information necessary to perfect the Claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary, and (iv) the Claimant's right to seek review of the denial. |
|
|
(c) |
An election to become a Transition Officer pursuant to Section 4.01 shall not be considered a Claim and shall not be subject to this Section 2.12. |
|
2.13 |
Review of Claim Denial. (a) If a Claim is denied, in whole or in part, the Claimant shall have the right to (i) request a review of the denial by the Committee or its delegate, (ii) review pertinent documents, (iii) submit issues and comments in writing to the Committee and (iv) appear before the Committee in person to present such issues and comments; provided that the Claimant files a written request for review with the Committee within 60 days after the Claimant's receipt of written notice of the denial. Within 60 days after the Committee receives a request for review, the review shall be made and the Claimant shall be advised in writing of the decision on review, unless special circumstances require an extension of time for such review, in which case the Claimant shall be given a written notice within such initial 60-day period specifying the reasons for the extension and when such review shall be completed; provided that such review shall be completed within 120 days after the filing of the request for review. The Committee's decision on review shall be sent to the Claimant in writing and shall include (i) specific reasons for the decision and (ii) references to Plan provisions upon which the decision is based. A decision on review shall be binding on all persons for all purposes. |
||
|
If a Claimant shall fail to file a request for review in accordance with the procedures herein outlined, such Claimant shall have no right to obtain such a review or to bring an action in any court, and the denial of the Claim shall become final and binding on all persons for all purposes except upon a showing of good cause for such failure. |
||
ARTICLE 3. RETENTION PERIOD |
|||
During an Executive's Retention Period (as defined in the next sentence), the Executive shall remain employed by the Company as an officer, on an at-will basis. Each Executive's "Retention Period" shall mean the period commencing on the Executive's Plan Start Date and ending on the later of the Executive's End Date (as specified on Appendix A) or the day before the Executive's Change-in-Status Date (as determined pursuant to Section 4.01 below). |
|||
ARTICLE 4. TRANSITION PERIOD |
|||
4.01 |
Election to Become a Transition Officer. |
||
|
(a) |
Transition Officer. Subject to the conditions set forth below, each Executive may elect to become a "Transition Officer" entitled to the benefits provided to Transition Officers hereunder (the "Transition Benefits"), effective on a date (hereinafter referred to as the Executive's "Change-in-Status Date") not earlier than the day after the Executive's End Date. |
|
|
(b) |
Conditions. The conditions that must be satisfied in order for an Executive's election to become a Transition Officer to be effective are as follows: (i) the Executive must remain employed by the Company through the end of his or her Retention Period; (ii) the Executive must properly execute a Transition Period Agreement not later than the Change-in-Status Date; (iii) the Executive must not revoke such Transition Period Agreement; (iv) in the case of a Tier II Executive or a Tier III Executive whose Change-in-Status Date occurs before his or her 62nd birthday, a successor to the Executive must have been selected by the Company and approved by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the "CEO") in the CEO's sole discretion; and (v) in the case of an Executive whose Change-in-Status Date occurs before his or her 62nd birthday, the Committee or the CEO, as applicable, must consent to the Executive's becoming a Transition Officer, in accordance with Section 4.01(c) below. |
|
|
(c) |
Election. An Executive shall make an election to become a Transition Officer by delivering to the Committee (in the case of an election by the CEO) or to the CEO (in the case of an election by any other Executive) a written notice indicating the proposed Change-in-Status Date, on such form as the Committee may from time to time prescribe. If the proposed Change-in-Status Date occurs before the Executive's 62nd birthday, the Committee or the CEO, as applicable, shall notify the Executive whether such election is accepted. If the proposed Change-in-Status Date occurs on or after the Executive's 62nd birthday, such election shall automatically be deemed accepted. If such election is accepted or deemed accepted, the Committee or the CEO, as applicable, shall also (1) notify the Executive whether the actual Change-in-Status Date will be the date proposed by the Executive or a later or earlier date reasonably selected by the Committee or the CEO, as applicable (but in no event earlier than the Executive's End Date), and (2) enclose with such notice the Transition Period Agreement for execution by the Executive. |
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
(d) |
Transition Period. If an Executive properly executes and returns the Transition Period Agreement, does not revoke the Transition Period Agreement and satisfies the other conditions set forth above, his or her election to become a Transition Officer shall become effective upon the applicable Change-in-Status Date, and the Executive shall thereafter serve as a Transition Officer during a number of months (the "Transition Period") equal to the lesser of (i) the number of the Executive's Years of Service (as defined below), or (ii) 18 months, subject to the provisions of this Plan. An Executive's "Years of Service" shall equal the number of 12-month intervals during the period beginning on the earlier of the Executive's historical service date or company service date and ending on the Change-in-Status Date, rounded down to the nearest complete 12-month interval (e.g., a period of 128 months and 3 days shall equal 10 "Years of Service"). |
|
4.02 |
Transition Benefits. |
||
|
(a) |
Base Salary. During an Executive's Transition Period, the Company shall pay the Executive a base salary at the annualized rate in effect on the day immediately preceding the Change-in-Status Date, but in no event lower than the highest base salary in effect at any time between the Executive's Plan Start Date and Change-in-Status Date, provided that the base salary payable under this Section 4.02(a) shall be reduced in accordance with any across-the-board reductions approved by the Committee prior to the Change-in-Status Date, which reductions affect Company officers generally. (The annualized amount of such base salary as in effect from time to time is referred to as the "Annual Base Salary.") In no event shall an Executive be eligible for merit increases in base salary during his or her Transition Period. |
|
|
(b) |
Annual Bonus. In respect of each calendar year which ends during or on the last day of an Executive's Transition Period, the Company shall pay to the Executive an Annual Bonus (as defined below) in a lump sum on April 1st of the following year (or such other date on which bonuses for such year are paid to participants in the Company's Target Incentive Program or any successor plan ("TIP") generally). If the Transition Period ends on a date other than the last day of a calendar year, the Company shall pay to the Executive (in lieu of an Annual Bonus) a Prorated Annual Bonus (as defined below) in a lump sum in cash within 60 days after the end of the Transition Period. The Executive shall not be entitled to elect to defer any portion of the Prorated Annual Bonus under any Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
|
|
For purposes of this Plan, |
|
|
|
(i) |
"Annual Bonus" shall mean an annual bonus equal to the product of the Annual Base Salary and the Full Target Percentage (as defined below); |
|
|
(ii) |
"Full Target Percentage" shall mean the target percentage which the Executive was eligible to receive under TIP on the day immediately preceding the Change-in-Status Date without any adjustment, but in no event lower than the Executive's highest target percentage in effect at any time between the Executive's Plan Start Date and Change-in-Status Date, provided that the target percentage shall be reduced in accordance with any across-the-board reductions approved by the Committee prior to the Change-in-Status Date which reductions affect Company officers generally; and |
|
|
(iii) |
"Prorated Annual Bonus" shall mean a bonus in an amount equal to the Annual Bonus multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days which have elapsed during the calendar year in question through the last day of the Transition Period, and the denominator of which is 365. |
|
(c) |
Three-Year Incentive Plan Awards. During an Executive's Transition Period, any outstanding awards that the Executive has been granted under the Company's Three-Year Incentive Plan or any successor plan ("LTIP") shall continue to vest and become payable in accordance with the Company's policies as in effect from time to time; provided, that such LTIP awards ("LTIP Awards") shall be computed by reference to 100% of the target percentage the Executive would have received pursuant to the terms of the original LTIP grant without any adjustment; and provided, further, that in the case of a Tier III Executive, such an LTIP Award shall not be paid unless the minimum corporate performance thresholds for the applicable performance period are met. |
|
|
(d) |
Benefit Programs and Policies. During an Executive's Transition Period, he or she shall participate in Employee Plans and Compensation Plans as provided in Section 1.02(d) above, except that: (i) the Executive shall not be eligible to participate in TIP except to the extent and on the terms provided for above in this Section 4.02; (ii) no new stock option grants shall be made to the Executive; (iii) no new awards shall be granted to the Executive under LTIP; (iv) no other new awards shall be granted to the Executive under any Compensation Plans; (v) the Executive shall not be entitled to participate in any other Compensation Plans; and (vi) the effect of the Executive's entering the Transition Period for any incentive awards that the Executive holds immediately before his or her Change in Status Date that are not specifically provided for above shall be as provided in the applicable plans and/or agreements. |
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
(e) |
Special Benefits for Tier I Executives. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, during his or her Transition Period, each Tier I Executive shall be provided by the Company with an office and secretarial services. |
|
4.03 |
Duties During Transition Period. During an Executive's Transition Period, the Executive shall serve as an officer of the Company in a position that is less senior than his or her position during the Retention Period (and in any case not an executive officer position), and shall devote substantially all of his or her normal business time and efforts to the business of the Company, its subsidiaries and its affiliates, the amount of such time to be sufficient to permit him or her to diligently and faithfully serve and endeavor to further its interests to the best of his or her ability. Subject to the foregoing, and to the requirements of the Executive's Agreement(s) then in effect, the Executive may participate in various civic and philanthropic activities, may serve on boards of directors and committees of not-for-profit organizations of the Executive's choice, and, to the extent consistent with the policies of the Company, may serve as a non-employee director of one or more corporations (unless the Committee concludes that such service would be inappropriate or not in the best interests of the Company). |
||
ARTICLE 5. CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT PERIOD |
|||
5.01 |
Employee Status. For the five-year period beginning immediately following the end of the Transition Period (the "Continued Employment Period"), the Executive shall serve as a staff employee of the Company, with the pay and benefits provided for in this Article 5, provided that the Executive: (a) remains an employee of the Company through the end of his or her Transition Period; (b) properly executes a Continued Employment Period Agreement not later than the last day of the Transition Period; (c) does not revoke such Continued Employment Period Agreement; and (d) complies with all Agreements that he or she is required under this Plan to execute. |
||
5.02 |
Continued Employment Benefits. |
||
|
(a) |
Base Salary. During an Executive's Continued Employment Period, the Company shall pay the Executive a base salary (the "Continued Employment Period Salary") at an annual rate equal to a percentage of his or her Annual Base Salary as in effect at the end of the Transition Period, which percentage is set forth opposite his or her name on Appendix A hereto. In no event shall an Executive be eligible for merit increases in base salary during his or her Continued Employment Period. |
|
|
(b) |
Three-Year Incentive Plan Awards. During an Executive's Continued Employment Period, any outstanding awards under LTIP shall be treated as provided in Section 4.02(c) above. |
|
|
(c) |
Benefit Programs and Policies. During an Executive's Continued Employment Period, he or she shall participate in Employee Plans and Compensation Plans as provided in Section 1.02(d) above, except that: (i) the Executive shall not be eligible to participate in TIP; (ii) no new stock option grants shall be made to the Executive; (iii) no new awards shall be granted to the Executive under LTIP; (iv) no other new awards shall be granted to the Executive under any Compensation Plans; (v) the Executive shall not be entitled to participate in any other Compensation Plans; and (vi) the effect of the Executive's entering the Continued Employment Period for any incentive awards that the Executive holds immediately before the beginning of his or her Continued Employment Period that are not specifically provided for above shall be as provided in the applicable plans and/or agreements. |
|
|
(d) |
Special Benefits for Tier I Executives. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, during the portion of his or her Continued Employment Period ending on the second anniversary of his or her Change-in-Status Date, each Tier I Executive shall be provided by the Company with an office and secretarial services. |
|
5.03 |
Time Devoted to Duties During Continued Employment Period. During an Executive's Continued Employment Period, the Executive shall devote such time to the business of the Company as may be reasonably requested by the Company from time to time, which requests shall be appropriate taking into account the compensation the Executive is receiving hereunder and the Executive's outside activities, services and arrangements permitted by the next sentence; provided, that in any event the Executive may be required by the Company to devote sufficient time to qualify for "part-time benefits-eligible" status (which is 20 hours per week, as of December 17, 2002). During the Continued Employment Period, the Executive may participate in various civic and philanthropic activities, may serve on boards of directors and committees of not-for-profit organizations of the Executive's choice, may serve as a member of one or more corporate boards of directors and may engage in a full-time employment arrangement with another organization of the Executive's choice, provided that such activities do not violate the Executive's obligations under the Executive's Agreement(s) then in effect. |
||
5.04 |
No Offset. In the event that an Executive shall engage in any employment arrangement permitted by Section 5.03 above (including without limitation self-employment) during the Continued Employment Period, no amount paid to or earned by such Executive therefrom shall reduce any payments or other benefits due such Executive pursuant to this Plan. |
||
|
|
|
|
52
ARTICLE 6. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT |
|||
6.01 |
Death or Disability . An Executive's employment shall terminate automatically upon his or her death during any Employment Period. In the event that (a) the Committee determines in good faith that an Executive is suffering from a "Disability" (together with its various cognates, as defined below) and (b) the appropriate decisionmaker under any applicable Company plan or program providing long-term disability benefits to the Executive (a "Disability Plan") similarly determines that the Executive is eligible for such benefits by virtue of the Executive's disability (as defined for purposes of such plan or program), the Company may deliver to the Executive written notice (a "Disability Termination Notice") in accordance with Section 6.05 above of the Company's intention to terminate the Executive's employment. In such event, the Executive's employment shall terminate effective on the later of (y) the 30th day after receipt of such Disability Termination Notice by the Executive or (z) the first date on which the Executive becomes eligible for long-term disability benefits under the principal Disability Plan applicable to the Executive (the "Disability Effective Date"), provided, however, that (1) in the interim the Executive shall not have returned to full-time performance of the Executive's duties and/or (2) the Executive shall not have delivered to the Committee within 30 days of receipt of a Disability Termination Notice a written objection thereto (an "Objection"). In the event of a timely Objection, any termination of the Executive shall be suspended and the Executive shall be promptly examined by two physicians or other professionals skilled in the relevant field, one selected by the Executive and one by the Committee. Each of the two professionals shall issue a written opinion within 15 days following the completion of his or her examination as to whether the Executive is Disabled in accordance with the definition provided in this Plan. If the two professionals agree, each of the Executive and the Company shall be bound by their joint conclusion. If the two professionals disagree, they shall jointly agree on a third professional to conduct a similar examination. Each of the Executive and the Company shall be bound by the conclusion of such third professional. The Executive agrees to each such examination and to waive any confidentiality rights necessary to allow each of the professionals conducting such examinations to do so. The Company shall pay all fees and costs of all such examinations. In the event of a disagreement as to the determination of the Executive's disability for purposes of a Disability Plan, such disagreement shall be resolved as provided for in such Disability Plan. For purposes of this Plan, the term "Disability" shall mean the material inability of the Executive, due to injury, illness, disease or bodily, mental or emotional infirmity, to carry out the job responsibilities which such Executive held or the tasks to which such Executive was assigned at the time of the incurrence of such Disability, which inability is reasonably expected to be permanent or of indefinite duration exceeding one year. |
||
6.02 |
Cause. The Company may terminate an Executive's employment at any time for Cause. For purposes of this Plan, "Cause" means: (i) the willful failure of an Executive to perform substantially all of the Executive's material duties with the Company (other than any failure resulting from incapacity resulting from physical or mental illness), after written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Executive by the Committee or the CEO; or (ii) a willful violation of the Company's material rules and policies (including without limitation the Standards of Business Conduct) as in effect from time to time; or (iii) the Executive's commission of any act or acts involving dishonesty, breach of fiduciary obligation to the Company, fraud, illegality, malfeasance or moral turpitude; or (iv) the Executive commits a criminal or civil violation or other improper act involving fraud or dishonesty; or (v) the Executive is found liable for or guilty in a civil matter of engaging in discriminatory conduct in violation of any labor or employment laws or in violating or contributing to a violation of an employee's civil rights; or (vi) the Executive materially breaches the terms of the Plan by revoking any Agreement that the Executive is required to execute, or by failing properly to execute, or violating any one or more of the provisions of, any Agreement that the Executive is required to execute; or (vii) the Executive refuses to carry out clearly assigned material duties or is otherwise insubordinate. Any act or failure to act, on the part of an Executive, that is described in clause (i), (ii), (vi) or (vii) of the preceding sentence of which the Committee receives actual notice shall not be considered "Cause" unless the Committee, the Board or an executive officer of the Company notifies the Executive that such act or failure to act is or may be considered "Cause" within one year after the Committee first receives such actual notice. For purposes of this provision, no act or failure to act, on the part of an Executive, shall be considered "willful," unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in bad faith or without reasonable belief that the Executive's action or omission was in the best interests of the Company. Any act, or failure to act, on the part of an Executive, based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board or upon the instructions of the CEO or an officer of the Company senior in rank to the Executive to whom the Executive reports or based upon the advice of counsel for the Company shall be conclusively presumed to be done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in good faith and in the best interests of the Company. The cessation of employment of an Executive shall not be deemed to be for Cause unless and until there shall have been delivered to the Executive a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board at a meeting of the Board called and held upon appropriate notice (after reasonable notice is provided to the Executive and the Executive is given an opportunity, together with counsel, to be heard before the Board), finding that, in the good faith opinion of the Board, the Executive is guilty of the conduct described in this paragraph, and specifying the particulars thereof in detail. |
||
|
|
|
|
53
6.03 |
Good Reason. During a Tier I Executive's Retention Period and Transition Period, the Tier I Executive may terminate his or her employment at any time for Good Reason. For purposes of this Plan, "Good Reason" shall mean: |
||
|
(a) |
the assignment to the Executive of any duties inconsistent in any respect with the Executive's position (including without limitation status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities as of the Executive's Plan Start Date, or any other action by the Company which results in a diminution in such position, authority, duties or responsibilities, excluding for this purpose (1) an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action, and (2) any material change in status, duties and responsibilities that is expressly contemplated by this Plan; or |
|
|
(b) |
the relocation of the Executive's principal place of employment to a location outside the greater Chicago metropolitan area. |
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing: (A) a Tier I Executive's termination of his or her employment shall not be considered to be for Good Reason if he or she has consented in writing to the occurrence of the event that constitutes Good Reason; and (B) a Tier I Executive's termination of his or her employment shall not be considered to be for Good Reason unless the Executive shall have delivered a written notice to the Committee within 30 days of his or her first having actual knowledge of the occurrence of the event that constitutes Good Reason, stating that he or she intends to terminate his or her employment for Good Reason and specifying the factual basis for such termination, and such event is not cured within 30 days of the Committee's receipt of such notice. |
||
6.04 |
Termination of Employment By the Company For Any Other Reason. During an Executive's Retention Period, the Company may also terminate the Executive's employment for any reason other than Cause by written notice to the Executive in accordance with Section 6.05 below of its intention to terminate the Executive's employment. During an Executive's Transition Period and Continued Employment Period, the Company may not terminate the Executive's employment other than for Cause or Disability. |
||
6.05 |
Notice of Termination. Any termination of an Executive's employment by the Company or the Executive pursuant to this Article 6 shall be communicated by Notice of Termination to the other party hereto given in accordance with this Section 6.05. For purposes of this Plan, a "Notice of Termination" means a written notice which (i) indicates the specific termination provision in this Plan relied upon, (ii) to the extent applicable, sets forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executive's employment under the provision so indicated, and (iii) if the Date of Termination (as defined in Section 6.06 below) is other than the date of receipt of such notice, specifies the termination date (which date shall be not more than 30 days after the giving of such notice). The failure by the Executive or the Company to set forth in the Notice of Termination any fact or circumstance which contributes to a showing of Good Reason or Cause shall not waive any right of the Executive or the Company, respectively, hereunder or preclude the Executive or the Company, respectively, from asserting such fact or circumstance in enforcing the Executive's or the Company's rights hereunder. |
||
6.06 |
Date of Termination. "Date of Termination" means (i) if an Executive's employment is terminated other than as a result of the Executive's death or Disability, the date of receipt of the Notice of Termination or any later date specified therein, as the case may be, (ii) if the Executive's employment is terminated as a result of the Executive's death, the date of death, and (iii) if the Executive's employment is terminated as a result of the Executive's Disability, the Disability Effective Date. |
||
ARTICLE 7. OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMPANY UPON TERMINATION |
|||
7.01 |
By an Executive for Good Reason; By the Company Other Than for Cause. This Section 7.01 sets forth the consequences of the following terminations of employment: (i) a termination of the employment of a Tier I, Tier II or Tier III Executive by the Company during his or her Retention Period other than for Cause; and (ii) a termination by a Tier I Executive of his or her employment for Good Reason during his or her Retention Period or Transition Period. In each such case, provided that the Executive properly executes a Termination Agreement, does not revoke such Termination Agreement, and complies with all Agreements that he or she is required under this Plan to execute: |
||
|
(a) |
the Company shall pay the following amounts (collectively, the "Termination Payments") to the Executive in a lump sum in cash: |
|
|
|
(i) |
the Accrued Obligations (as defined below), |
|
|
(ii) |
the Earned Bonus (as defined below), if any, |
|
|
(iii) |
the Severance Benefit (as defined below), and |
|
|
(iv) |
the Welfare Benefit (as defined below); and |
54
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
the following categories of stock options shall vest as of the Executive's Date of Termination and remain exercisable until the first to occur of (x) the fifth anniversary (if the Executive is a Tier I Executive or a Tier II Executive) or the third anniversary (if the Executive is a Tier III Executive) of the Date of Termination or (y) the latest date on which such options would have expired, had the Executive's employment not terminated: (i) all options that are vested as of the Executive's Date of Termination; and (ii) all options that would have vested within five years (if the Executive is a Tier I Executive or a Tier II Executive) or within three years (if the Executive is a Tier III Executive) following the Executive's Date of Termination, if the Executive had remained employed by the Company. |
|
|
The Termination Payments shall be paid not later than the latest of (1) the 60th day following the Date of Termination, (2) the first day on which the Executive has properly executed the Termination Agreement and the Termination Agreement has ceased to be revocable (and has not been revoked), and (3) in the case of any Earned Bonus for a year that ends during the Executive's Retention Period, the date on which bonuses under TIP for such year are paid to TIP participants generally. |
||
|
For purposes of this Plan: |
||
|
(A) |
"Accrued Obligations" shall mean the sum of (1) any unpaid base salary accrued through the Date of Termination and (2) any accrued vacation pay, in each case to the extent not previously paid; |
|
|
(B) |
"Discount Rate" shall mean the interest rate equal to the Prime Rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal, Midwest Edition, as in effect on the Date of Termination; |
|
|
(C) |
"Earned Bonus" means any annual bonus under TIP in respect of any calendar year ended before the Date of Termination to which the Executive would have been entitled under TIP (if the Date of Termination is during the Retention Period) and under this Plan (if the Date of Termination is during the Transition Period), if his or her employment had not terminated; |
|
|
(D) |
"Severance Benefit" means a lump sum payment equal to the aggregate amounts of Annual Base Salary, Annual Bonuses (excluding Earned Bonuses) and/or Continued Employment Period Salary that would have been payable to the Executive if his or her employment had continued through the end of the Continued Employment Period, discounted from the scheduled payment dates to the Date of Termination by reference to the Discount Rate; |
|
|
(E) |
"Target Percentage" shall mean the target percentage of the annual bonus that the Executive was eligible to receive under TIP on the day immediately preceding the Change-in-Status Date without any adjustment, but in no event lower than the Executive's highest target percentage in effect at any time between the Executive's Plan Start Date and Change-in-Status Date, provided that the target percentage shall be reduced to reflect any across-the-board reductions implemented by the Committee prior to the Change-in-Status Date, which reductions affect Company officers generally; and |
|
|
(F) |
"Welfare Benefit" shall mean a lump sum payment in lieu of continued participation in those Benefit Plans that provide health, medical, dental and life insurance benefits an amount equal to the estimated cost that the Company would have incurred to provide benefits under such plans to the Executive through the end of the Continued Employment Period (as reasonably determined by the Committee in its sole discretion on the Date of Termination). |
|
|
In determining the Severance Benefit and the Welfare Benefit, the following rules shall apply. If an Executive's employment has terminated during his or her Retention Period, such amounts shall be determined as if Date of Termination had been his or her Change-in-Status Date, and he or she had remained employed during the Transition Period and a full five-year Continued Employment Period thereafter. If an Executive's employment has terminated during his or her Transition Period, such amounts shall be determined as if he or she shall had remained employed during the remainder of the Transition Period and for a full five-year Continued Employment Period thereafter. |
||
7.02 |
Death; Disability. If, during any of an Executive's Employment Periods, the Executive dies or the Executive's employment is terminated by reason of Disability, the Company shall have no further obligations to the Executive or the Executive's legal representatives pursuant to this Plan, other than for: |
||
|
(a) |
payment of the Accrued Obligations and any Earned Bonus for a year that ends after the Retention Period in a lump sum in cash within 60 days of the Date of Termination, and any Earned Bonus for a year that ends during the Retention Period at the same time as bonuses under TIP for that year are paid to TIP participants generally; and |
|
|
(b) |
payment or provision of death benefits or disability benefits, as applicable, equal to the benefits provided by the Company to the estates and beneficiaries of other employees of the Company at the level in which the Executive was serving at the time of his or her death or termination for Disability, as applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
55
56
10.03 |
Payments to Beneficiary. If an Executive dies before receiving amounts to which he or she is entitled under this Plan or any Agreement, such amounts shall be paid to the Beneficiary (as defined below) or if none, to the Executive's estate. If a Beneficiary dies before complete payment of any benefits attributable to a deceased Executive, the remaining benefits shall be paid the Beneficiary's estate. For purposes of this Plan, a "Beneficiary" shall mean any person, firm, corporation, partnership, venture or other entity of any kind, including without limitation any entity which is tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, designated in writing by an Executive in accordance with procedures established by the Committee. |
||
10.04 |
Notices. Any notice, request, election, or other official communication under this Plan or any Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered personally, by courier service, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested or (in the case of the Company, the CEO or the HR Official (as defined in the Agreements)) by facsimile, and shall be effective upon actual receipt by the party to which such notice shall be directed, and shall be addressed as follows: (i) if to the Company, or McDonald's Corporation, One McDonald's Plaza, Oak Brook IL 60523, Attention: Corporate Secretary, facsimile:(630) 623-0497, (ii) if to the CEO or the HR Official, to such official at One McDonald's Plaza, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, facsimile:(630) 623-7409, and (iii) if to an Executive, the last mailing address as specified by the Executive in accordance with Section 10.02 above. |
||
10.05 |
Right to Amend Compensation Plans and Employee Plans. Nothing in this Plan or any Agreement shall be construed to limit the ability of the Company to amend or terminate any of the Compensation Plans and Employee Plans, and any such terminations or amendments shall be effective as to the Executives. |
||
10.06 |
Non-Alienation. No Executive shall have the right to assign, transfer or anticipate an interest in any benefit under this Plan or any Agreement. |
||
10.07 |
Severability. If any one or more articles, sections or other portions of this Plan or of any Agreement are declared by any court or governmental authority to be unlawful or invalid, such unlawfulness or invalidity shall not serve to invalidate any article, section or other portion not so declared to be unlawful or invalid. Any article, section or other portion so declared to be unlawful or invalid shall be construed so as to effectuate the terms of such article, section or other portion to the fullest extent possible while remaining lawful and valid. |
||
10.08 |
No Waiver. The Company's or an Executive's failure to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Plan or of any Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such provision or any other provision of this Plan or of any Agreement. The Company or an Executive may waive any or all of the provisions of this Plan or of any Agreement only by signing a document to that effect. A waiver of any provision of this Plan or of any Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other provision, and any waiver of any default in any such provision shall not be deemed a waiver of any later default thereof or of any other provision. |
||
10.09 |
Governing Law. This Plan is an "employee benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). It is intended to constitute a "welfare plan" within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, but to the extent it is held to be a "pension plan" within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA, it constitutes an unfunded plan maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees. To the extent not preempted by federal law, this Plan and all Agreements shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois, without regard to any otherwise applicable conflicts of law or choice of law principles. |
||
10.10 |
Captions. The captions of the Sections and Articles of this Plan are not a part of the provisions hereof and shall have no force or effect. |
||
10.11 |
No Mitigation or Offset. In no event shall any Executive or the Company be obligated to take any action by way of mitigation of any damages caused by the breach by the Company or any Executive, as applicable, of its, his or her obligations under this Plan. No Executive's Termination Benefits shall be reduced by any compensation that the Executive earns after his or her Date of Termination from employment or self-employment, provided that such employment or self-employment does not violate the Executive's obligations under his or her Agreements. |
|
|
McDonald's Corporation Date: December 18, 2002 |
||
|
|
/S/ |
|
Robert N. Thurston |
|
||||
By |
Robert N. Thurston
Chairman, Compensation Committee |
|||
57
Tier | Name | Plan start date | End date |
Percentage for salary
during continued employment period |
||||
|
||||||||
I | Jack M. Greenberg | April 29, 1998 | April 29, 2003 | 50% | ||||
I | James R. Cantalupo | April 29, 1998 | April 29, 2001 | 50% | ||||
II |
|
Claire H. Babrowski |
|
October 1, 1998 |
|
October 1, 2001 |
|
35% |
II | James A. Skinner | October 1, 1998 | October 1, 2001 | 35% | ||||
II | Stanley R. Stein | October 1, 1998 | October 1, 2001 | 35% | ||||
III |
|
Charles H. Bell |
|
October 29, 2002 |
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
35% |
III | Michael J. Roberts | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Gloria Santona | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Jack Daly | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Eduardo Sanchez | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Matthew H. Paull | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Lynn Crump-Caine | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Mats Lederhausen | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
III | Russell P. Smyth | October 29, 2002 | October 29, 2005 | 35% | ||||
|
||||||||
58
Appendix B. Index of Defined Terms
Accrued Obligations | Section 7.01(A) | |
Affected Executive | Article 9 | |
Agreement | Section 1.02(b) | |
Annual Base Salary | Section 4.02(a)(i) | |
Annual Bonus | Section 4.02(b) | |
Beneficiary |
|
Section 10.03 |
Board | Section 2.01 | |
Cause |
|
Section 6.02 |
CEO | Section 4.01(b) | |
Change-in-Status Date | Section 4.01(a) | |
Claim | Section 2.13(a) | |
Claimant | Section 2.13(a) | |
Committee | Section 2.01 | |
Company | Introduction | |
Compensation Plans | Section 1.02(d) | |
Continued Employment Period | Section 5.01 | |
Continued Employment Period Agreement | Section 1.02(c) | |
Continued Employment Period Salary | Section 5.02 | |
Date of Termination |
|
Section 6.06 |
Deferred Compensation Plans | Section 1.02(e) | |
Disability | Section 6.01 | |
Disability Effective Date | Section 6.01 | |
Disability Plan | Section 6.01 | |
Discount Rate | Section 7.01(B) | |
Earned Bonus |
|
Section 7.01(C) |
Effective Date | Introduction | |
Employee Plans | Section 1.02(d) | |
Employment Periods | Section 1.02(a) | |
End Date | Appendix A | |
Executives | Section 1.02(a) | |
Full Target Percentage |
|
Section 4.02(b)(ii) |
Good Reason |
|
Section 6.03 |
HR Official |
|
Section 10.04 |
LTIP |
|
Section 4.02(c) |
LTIP Awards | Section 4.02(c) | |
Notice of Termination |
|
Section 6.05 |
Objection |
|
Section 6.01 |
Plan |
|
Introduction |
Plan Administrator | Section 2.02 | |
Prorated Annual Bonus | Section 4.02(b)(iii) | |
Relevant Prior Benefits |
|
Section 1.02(c) |
Retention Period | Article 3 | |
Severance Benefit |
|
Section 7.01(D) |
Target Percentage |
|
Section 7.01(E) |
Termination Agreement | Section 1.02(b) | |
Termination Benefits | Section 1.02(b) | |
Termination Payments | Section 7.01(a) | |
Tier I Executive | Appendix A | |
Tier II Executive | Appendix A | |
Tier III Executive | Appendix A | |
TIP | Section 4.02(b) | |
Transition Benefits | Section 4.01(a) | |
Transition Officer | Section 4.01(a) | |
Transition Period | Section 4.01(d) | |
Transition Period Agreement | Section 1.02(b) | |
Violation |
|
Section 1.02(c) |
Welfare Benefit |
|
Section 7.01(F) |
Years of Service |
|
Section 4.01(d) |
59
Exhibit A. Transition Period Agreement
THIS TRANSITION PERIOD AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , , by and between McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and (the "Executive"), pursuant to the Company's Executive Retention Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Executive is a Tier Executive under the Plan; and
WHEREAS, if the Executive complies with his/her obligations under the Plan, he/she will hereafter be entitled to substantial compensation and benefits under the Plan to which he/she would not otherwise be entitled; and
WHEREAS, the Executive is required under the Plan to execute this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
Agreement. defined in the first paragraph above.
Company. defined in the first paragraph above.
Company Property. all records, documents, materials, papers, computer records or print-outs belonging to McDonald's, including without limitation those containing Confidential Information and Trade Secrets.
Competing Business. any Person (and any branches, offices or operations thereof) that is a material and direct competitor of McDonald's in any country in the world or in any state of the United States by virtue of selling, manufacturing, processing or promoting any product that is substantially similar to, competes with, or is intended to compete with, replace, or duplicate in the market any product that was sold or under development by McDonald's during the five years (or shorter period of the Executive's employment with the Company) preceding the date of execution of this Agreement or with respect to which the Executive has had specific knowledge and involvement.
Confidential Information and Trade Secrets. all valuable and unique tangible and intangible information and techniques acquired, developed or used by McDonald's relating to its business, operations, employees and customers, which gives McDonald's a competitive advantage in the businesses in which McDonald's is engaged, including without limitation processes, methods, techniques, systems, computer data, formulae, patents, models, devices, compilations, customer lists, supplier lists or any information of whatever nature that gives McDonald's an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use such data or information.
Executive. defined in the first paragraph above.
HR Official. the Company's Senior Executive Vice President of Human Resources (or any successor position).
McDonald's. the Company and its subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and related companies.
McDonald's-Related Person. any director, officer, employee or franchisee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and related companies.
Other Separation Benefits. defined in Section 9(c) below.
Person. a person, firm, corporation, partnership, venture or other entity of any kind.
Plan. defined in the first paragraph above.
Recovery Period. defined in Section 10(c)(iii) below.
Release Date. the Executive's Change-in-Status Date.
Released Persons. defined in Section 9(a) below.
Specified Competitors. the entities listed on Exhibit B hereto and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates, as required by Section 1.02(b) of the Plan.
Stock Option Gains. defined in Section 10(c)(iv) below.
Violation. defined in Section 8(a) below.
60
61
62
63
64
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
McDonald's Corporation |
||
|
|
/S/ |
|
|
|
||||
By | ||||
(Title) |
65
EXHIBIT A. EXECUTIVE RETENTION PLAN
[Attach]
66
EXHIBIT B. SPECIFIED COMPETITORS
[List of 25 to be inserted upon preparation of specific Agreement]
67
Exhibit B. Continued Employment Period Agreement
THIS CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT PERIOD AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , , by and between McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and (the "Executive"), pursuant to the Company's Executive Retention Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Executive is a Tier Executive under the Plan; and
WHEREAS, if the Executive complies with his/her obligations under the Plan, he/she will hereafter be entitled to substantial compensation and benefits under the Plan to which he/she would not otherwise be entitled; and
WHEREAS, during the Executive's Transition Period, the Executive has received substantial compensation and benefits under the Plan to which he/she would not otherwise have been entitled; and
WHEREAS, the Executive is required under the Plan to execute this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
Agreement. defined in the first paragraph above.
Company. defined in the first paragraph above.
Company Property. all records, documents, materials, papers, computer records or print-outs belonging to McDonald's, including without limitation those containing Confidential Information and Trade Secrets.
Competing Business. any Person (and any branches, offices or operations thereof) that is a material and direct competitor of McDonald's in any country in the world or in any state of the United States by virtue of selling, manufacturing, processing or promoting any product that is substantially similar to, competes with, or is intended to compete with, replace, or duplicate in the market any product that was sold or under development by McDonald's during the five years (or shorter period of the Executive's employment with the Company) preceding the date of execution of this Agreement or with respect to which the Executive has had specific knowledge and involvement.
Confidential Information and Trade Secrets. all valuable and unique tangible and intangible information and techniques acquired, developed or used by McDonald's relating to its business, operations, employees and customers, which gives McDonald's a competitive advantage in the businesses in which McDonald's is engaged, including without limitation processes, methods, techniques, systems, computer data, formulae, patents, models, devices, compilations, customer lists, supplier lists or any information of whatever nature that gives McDonald's an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use such data or information.
Executive. defined in the first paragraph above.
HR Official. the Company's Senior Executive Vice President of Human Resources (or any successor position).
McDonald's. the Company and its subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and related companies.
McDonald's-Related Person. any director, officer, employee or franchisee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and related companies.
Other Separation Benefits. defined in Section 9(c) below.
Person. a person, firm, corporation, partnership, venture or other entity of any kind.
Plan. defined in the first paragraph above.
Recovery Period. defined in Section 10(c)(iii) below.
Release Date. the last day of the Executive's Transition Period.
Released Persons. defined in Section 9(a) below.
Specified Competitors. the entities listed on Exhibit B hereto and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates, as required by Section 1.02(b) of the Plan.
Stock Option Gains. defined in Section 10(c)(iv) below.
Violation. defined in Section 8(a) below.
68
69
70
71
72
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
McDonald's Corporation |
||
|
|
/S/ |
|
|
|
||||
By | ||||
(Title) |
73
EXHIBIT A. EXECUTIVE RETENTION PLAN
[Attach]
74
EXHIBIT B. SPECIFIED COMPETITORS
[List of 25 to be inserted upon preparation of specific Agreement]
75
Exhibit C. Termination Agreement
THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , , by and between McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and (the "Executive"), pursuant to the Company's Executive Retention Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Executive is a Tier Executive under the Plan; and
WHEREAS, if the Executive complies with his/her obligations under the Plan, he/she will hereafter be entitled to substantial compensation and benefits under the Plan to which he/she would not otherwise be entitled; and
[WHEREAS, during the Executive's Transition Period [and Continued Employment Period] (1) , the Executive has received substantial compensation and benefits under the Plan to which he/she would not otherwise have been entitled; and] (2)
WHEREAS, the Executive is required under the Plan to execute this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
Agreement. defined in the first paragraph above.
Company. defined in the first paragraph above.
Company Property. all records, documents, materials, papers, computer records or print-outs belonging to McDonald's, including without limitation those containing Confidential Information and Trade Secrets.
Competing Business. any Person (and any branches, offices or operations thereof) that is a material and direct competitor of McDonald's in any country in the world or in any state of the United States by virtue of selling, manufacturing, processing or promoting any product that is substantially similar to, competes with, or is intended to compete with, replace, or duplicate in the market any product that was sold or under development by McDonald's during the five years (or shorter period of the Executive's employment with the Company) preceding the date of execution of this Agreement or with respect to which the Executive has had specific knowledge and involvement.
Confidential Information and Trade Secrets. all valuable and unique tangible and intangible information and techniques acquired, developed or used by McDonald's relating to its business, operations, employees and customers, which gives McDonald's a competitive advantage in the businesses in which McDonald's is engaged, including without limitation processes, methods, techniques, systems, computer data, formulae, patents, models, devices, compilations, customer lists, supplier lists or any information of whatever nature that gives McDonald's an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use such data or information.
Executive. defined in the first paragraph above.
HR Official. the Company's Senior Executive Vice President of Human Resources (or any successor position).
McDonald's. the Company and its subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and related companies.
McDonald's-Related Person. any director, officer, employee or franchisee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and related companies.
Other Separation Benefits. defined in Section 9(c) below.
Person. a person, firm, corporation, partnership, venture or other entity of any kind.
Plan. defined in the first paragraph above.
Recovery Period. defined in Section 10(c)(iii) below.
76
Release Date. the Executive's Date of Termination.
Released Persons. defined in Section 9(a) below.
Specified Competitors. the entities listed on Exhibit B hereto and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates, as required by Section 1.02(b) of the Plan.
Stock Option Gains. defined in Section 10(c)(iv) below.
Violation. defined in Section 8(a) below.
[the expiration of his/her Continued Employment Period]
[termination by the Company during the Executive's Retention Period, other than for Cause]
[termination by the Executive for Good Reason during his/her [Retention Period] [Transition Period] (3)
The Executive's Date of Termination is , . This Agreement constitutes the Executive's Termination Agreement.
[For a Termination Agreement entered into in connection with a termination covered by Section 7.01 of the Plan] The Executive shall be entitled to receive Termination Benefits in accordance with Section 7.01 of the Plan, provided that the Executive properly executes this Agreement, does not revoke this Agreement, and complies with all Agreements that he or she is required under the Plan to execute. These Termination Benefits are outlined on Exhibit C hereto.
77
78
79
80
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
McDonald's Corporation |
||
|
|
/S/ |
|
|
|
||||
By | ||||
(Title) |
81
EXHIBIT A. EXECUTIVE RETENTION PLAN
[Attach]
82
EXHIBIT B. SPECIFIED COMPETITORS
[List of 25 to be inserted upon preparation of specific Agreement]
83
EXHIBIT C. TERMINATION BENEFITS
[To be completed upon preparation of specific Agreement]
Termination Benefits paid in a lump sum as per Section 7.01(a) of the Plan:
Accrued Obligations: | $ |
|
|
Earned Bonus: | $ |
|
|
Severance Benefit: | $ |
|
|
Welfare Benefit: | $ |
|
Stock Options that vest and remain exercisable in accordance with Section 7.01(b) of the Plan:
[List]
84
Exhibit 12. McDonald's Corporation statement Re: computation of ratios
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS | Years ended December 31, 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Earnings available for fixed charges | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
1,662.1 |
(1) |
$ |
2,329.7 |
(3) |
$ |
2,882.3 |
|
$ |
2,884.1 |
|
$ |
2,307.4 |
(5) |
||
Minority interest expense (income) in operating results of majority-owned subsidiaries, including fixed charges related to redeemable preferred stock, less equity in undistributed operating results of less than 50%-owned affiliates |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
16.2 |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
23.7 |
|
||
Income tax provision (benefit) of 50%-owned affiliates included in consolidated income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
51.0 |
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
72.8 |
|
|
99.9 |
|
||
Portion of rent charges (after reduction for rental income from subleased properties) considered to be representative of interest factors * |
|
|
266.7 |
|
|
252.5 |
|
|
207.0 |
|
|
178.5 |
|
|
161.3 |
|
||
Interest expense, amortization of debt discount and issuance costs, and depreciation of capitalized interest * |
|
|
419.7 |
|
|
510.3 |
|
|
470.3 |
|
|
440.1 |
|
|
461.9 |
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||||
$ | 2,345.6 | $ | 3,128.1 | $ | 3,669.5 | $ | 3,597.4 | $ | 3,054.2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Fixed charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Portion of rent charges (after reduction for rental income from subleased properties) considered to be representative of interest factors * |
|
$ |
266.7 |
|
$ |
252.5 |
|
$ |
207.0 |
|
$ |
178.5 |
|
$ |
161.3 |
|
||
Interest expense, amortization of debt discount and issuance costs, and fixed charges related to redeemable preferred stock * |
|
|
401.7 |
|
|
492.9 |
|
|
457.9 |
|
|
431.3 |
|
|
453.4 |
|
||
Capitalized interest * |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
18.3 |
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||||
$ | 682.8 | $ | 760.8 | $ | 681.4 | $ | 624.5 | $ | 633.0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 3.44 | (2) | 4.11 | (4) | 5.39 | 5.76 | 4.82 | (6) | ||||||||||
|
85
Exhibit 21. McDONALD'S CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY (STATE OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION)
DOMESTIC
SUBSIDIARIES
McDonald's Deutschland, Inc. (Delaware)
McDonald's Restaurant Operations Inc. (Delaware)
McG Development Co. (Delaware)
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Delaware)
Boston Market Corporation (Delaware)
FOREIGN
SUBSIDIARIES
McDonald's Franchise GmbH (Austria)
McDonald's Australia Limited (Australia)
McDonald's France, S.A. (France)
MDC Inmobiliaria de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
McDonald's Restaurants Pte., Ltd (Singapore)
Restaurantes McDonald's S.A. (Spain)
McKim Company Ltd. (South Korea)
Shin Mac Company Ltd. (South Korea)
McDonald's Nederland B.V. (Netherlands)
Moscow-McDonald's (Canada)
McDonald's Restaurants Limited (United Kingdom)
The names of certain subsidiaries have been omitted as follows:
86
Exhibit 23. CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of McDonald's Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 23, 2003 with respect to the Consolidated financial statements of McDonald's Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Commission File No.
|
||
Form S-8 | Form S-3 | |
|
||
33-09267 | 33-00001 | |
33-24958 | 33-64873 | |
33-49817 | 333-25899 | |
33-50701 | 333-59145 | |
33-58840 | 333-60170 | |
333-03409 | 333-82920 | |
333-65033 | 333-92212 | |
333-36776 | ||
333-36778 | ||
333-71656 | ||
|
|
|
ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Chicago, Illinois March 12, 2003 |
|
|
87
Exhibit 99.1. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McDonald's Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, James R. Cantalupo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
Date: March 12, 2003
|
|
/s/ James R. Cantalupo |
||
|
||||
By |
James R. Cantalupo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
88
Exhibit 99.2. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McDonald's Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Matthew H. Paull, Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
Date: March 12, 2003
|
|
/s/ Matthew H. Paull |
||
|
||||
By |
Matthew H. Paull
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
89