Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008

OR

o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the transition period from                        to                         .

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 333-129179

NATIONAL MENTOR HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware   31-1757086
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

313 Congress Street, 6 th  Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02210

 

(617) 790-4800
(Address of principal executive offices,
including zip code)
  (Registrant's telephone number,
including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None.

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  o     No  ý

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  o     No  ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  o     No  ý

         The Company is a voluntary filer of reports required of companies with public securities under Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has filed all reports which would have been required of the Company during the past 12 months had it been subject to such provisions.

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o   Accelerated filer  o   Non-accelerated filer  ý
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company  o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o     No  ý

         The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 31, 2008, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was zero.

         As of December 22, 2008, there were 100 shares of the registrant's common stock, $0.01 par value, issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

   

Item 1.

 

Business

  1

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  7

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  18

Item 2.

 

Properties

  18

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  19

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  19

PART II

   

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  20

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  21

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  23

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

  34

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  35

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  35

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  35

Item 9A(T).

 

Controls and Procedures

  35

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

  38

PART III

   

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  39

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

  42

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  55

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  56

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  60

PART IV

   

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

  61

Signatures

  62

i


Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Some of the matters discussed in this annual report on Form 10-K may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential" or "continue," the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

        The information in this report is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with our business. There can be no assurance that other factors will not affect the accuracy of these forward-looking statements or that our actual results will not differ materially from the results anticipated in such forward-looking statements. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by us include, but are not limited to, those factors or conditions described under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this report as well as the following:

ii


Table of Contents

        Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, we do not assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the "risk factors" and other cautionary statements included herein. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in the Company's expectations.

        Unless otherwise noted or the context otherwise requires, references to "MENTOR", the "Company", "we", "us" and "our" are to National Mentor Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries; references to "NMH Investment" are to NMH Investment, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed by Vestar, exclusive of its subsidiaries; and references to "Vestar" are to Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P.

        We refer to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as "fiscal 2008," the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as "fiscal 2007," and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 as "fiscal 2006."

iii


Table of Contents


PART I

Item 1.    Business

Company Overview

        We are a leading provider of home and community-based human services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, at-risk children and youth with emotional, behavioral or medically complex needs and their families, and persons with an acquired brain injury. Since our founding in 1980, we have grown to provide services to more than 23,000 clients in 35 states and the District of Columbia. We design customized service plans to meet the unique needs of our clients in home- and community-based settings. Most of our services involve residential support, typically in small group home or host home settings, designed to improve our clients' quality of life and to promote client independence and participation in community life. Other services that we provide include day programs, vocational services, case management, early intervention, family-based services, post-acute treatment and neurorehabilitation services, among others. Our customized services offer our clients, as well as the payors for these services, an attractive, cost-effective alternative to human services provided in large, institutional settings.

        We believe that our broad range of services, high-quality reputation and relationships with government agencies have made us one of the largest providers in the United States of home and community-based services. In the past three years, our management team has grown the Company organically through investment in new programs and geographies, which we refer to as new starts, census growth in existing programs and cross-selling programs within existing markets. In addition, since fiscal 2003, we have completed and integrated more than 25 acquisitions.

        As of September 30, 2008, we provided our services through approximately 16,200 full-time equivalent employees, as well as approximately 4,500 independently contracted host home caregivers, or Mentors. We derive approximately 94% of our revenues from a diverse group of state and county governmental payors. We generated net revenues of approximately $962.9 million, $910.1 million and $789.2 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

        We operate our business as one human services reporting segment with two operating groups: the Cambridge Operating Group and the Redwood Operating Group. Our service lines described below do not represent operating segments under Financial Accounting Standard No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131) as management does not internally evaluate the operating performance or review the results of the service lines to assess performance or make decisions about allocating resources. Also, discrete financial information is not available by service line at the level necessary for management to assess the performance or make resource allocation decisions. For additional information, see note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

        Our services are offered through a variety of models, including (i) small group homes, most of which house six people or fewer, (ii) host homes, or the "Mentor" model, in which a client lives in the home of a trained Mentor, (iii) in-home settings, in which we support clients' independence with 24-hour services in their own homes, (iv) non-residential settings, consisting primarily of day programs and periodic services in various settings and (v) educational settings, in which we offer in-school, after-school and alternative educational services. We provide services in these settings to the following population groups:

         Individuals with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities ("I/DD").     The largest part of our business is the delivery of services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Our I/DD programs include residential support, day habilitation, vocational services, case management, home healthcare and personal care. We provide services to these clients through small group homes, Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded ("ICFs-MR"), host homes, in-home settings and

1


Table of Contents


non-residential settings. As of September 30, 2008, we provided I/DD services to more than 13,000 clients in 28 states. For fiscal 2008, our I/DD services generated net revenues of $622.5 million, representing approximately 65% of our net revenues. We receive substantially all our revenues for I//DD services from state and local governmental payors.

         At-Risk Youth and Their Families ("ARY").     We provide a variety of services to children with severe emotional, developmental, medical and behavioral challenges, to youth involved in the juvenile justice system and to their families. Our ARY programs include therapeutic foster care, independent living, family reunification, family preservation, early intervention, alternative schools and adoption services. Our individualized approach allows us to work with an ever-changing client population that is diverse in terms of age and gender as well as in type and severity of condition. We provide services to these clients through host homes, group homes, educational settings and non-residential settings. As of September 30, 2008, we provided ARY services to approximately 7,000 children, adolescents and their families in 25 states. For fiscal 2008, our ARY services generated net revenues of $220.8 million, representing approximately 23% of our net revenues. We receive substantially all our revenues for ARY services from state and local governmental payors.

         Individuals with an Acquired Brain Injury ("ABI").     We provide a range of post-acute treatment and longer-term care services to clients with ABI, defined as an injury to the brain sustained after birth. Our ABI services range from post-acute care to assisted independent living and include neurobehavioral rehabilitation, neurorehabilitation, adolescent integration, outpatient or day treatment and pre-vocational services. Our goal is to provide a continuum of care that allows our clients to achieve the highest level of function possible while enhancing their quality of life. We provide services to these clients primarily through small group homes, in-home settings and non-residential settings. Through our CareMeridian business, we also provide residential services to catastrophically injured pediatric and adult populations who are slow to recover and are in need of longer-term services. These services are delivered in the community in small- to medium-sized facilities with specialized licensure. In certain circumstances we provide services to clients with highly acute conditions in larger facilities as well as facilities affiliated with hospitals. As of September 30, 2008, we provided ABI services in 15 states and served approximately 500 clients nationally. For fiscal 2008, our ABI services generated net revenues of $98.1 million, representing approximately 10% of our net revenues. For fiscal 2008, we received approximately 46% of our ABI revenues from state and local governmental payors and approximately 54% from private payors.

         Other.     We derive revenues from other sources, including through the provision of home health services to individuals with physical disabilities and the elderly. Our services to these clients include skilled nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, personal care and homemaking services, among others. For fiscal 2008, these other sources of revenues generated net revenues of $21.5 million, representing approximately 2% of our net revenues. Our revenues for these services come from a mix of governmental and private payors.

Industry Overview

        The human services industry provides services to people with a range of disabilities and special needs, including (i) individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, (ii) at-risk children and youth with emotional, behavioral or medically complex needs and their families and (iii) individuals with an acquired brain injury. The market for these services remains highly fragmented, with the majority of service providers consisting of not-for-profit organizations, small- or medium-sized proprietary entities and publicly owned entities. Our primary population group, I/DD is funded primarily through Medicaid, a joint federal and state health insurance program under which eligible state expenditures are matched with federal funding. In addition, funds are also provided by other federal, state and local governmental programs and, to a lesser extent, private payors.

2


Table of Contents

Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities

        As of 2006, the most recent year for which data are available, approximately 1.6% of the U.S. population, or 4.7 million people, were considered to have I/DD, which is a severe, chronic developmental disability attributable to a mental or physical impairment. These individuals live in supervised residential settings, including institutions, with family caregivers or on their own. Public spending on I/DD services grew from an estimated $30.0 billion in 1998 to an estimated $43.8 billion in 2006, a rate of 4.8% per year. In 2006, approximately 536,000 individuals with I/DD received care within a supervised residential setting, representing only 11% of the I/DD population. Approximately 60% of the I/DD population, or approximately 2.8 million individuals, remained in the care of their family and approximately 29%, or 1.4 million individuals, lived independently.

        Over the past two decades, the delivery of services to the I/DD population in supervised residential settings has grown significantly and, at the same time, there has been a major shift from institutional settings to home and community-based settings, both in part due to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and the U.S. Supreme Court Olmstead decision in 1999. The U.S. Supreme Court held in its Olmstead decision that under the ADA, states are required to place persons with mental disabilities in community settings rather than in institutions when such placement is deemed appropriate by medical professionals, the transfer from institutional care to a less restricted setting is not opposed by the affected individual and the placement can be accommodated taking into account the resources available to the state and the needs of other individuals with mental disabilities. We believe that community settings provide a higher quality and, in some cases, lower cost alternative to care provided in state institutions.

        The Home and Community-Based Services ("HCBS") Waiver program, a Medicaid program where the federal government has waived the requirement that services be delivered in institutional settings, is the primary funding vehicle for home and community-based services. The HCBS Waiver program was instituted as an alternative to the intermediate care facilities/mentally retarded program, or ICF-MR program, described below, authorizing federal reimbursement for a wide variety of community supports and services, including life-skills training, respite care, other family support, case management, supported employment and supported living. In this program, the provider responds to the client's identified needs and typically is paid on a fee-for-service basis.

        The Federal ICF-MR Program was established in 1971 when legislation was enacted to provide for Federal Financial Participation ("FFP") for ICF-MR as an optional Medicaid service. This congressional authorization allows states to receive federal matching funds for institutional services that are funded with state or local government dollars. To qualify for Medicaid reimbursement, ICFs-MR must be certified and comply with federal standards in eight areas: management, client protections, facility staffing, active treatment services, client behavior and facility practices, health care services, physical environment and dietetic services.

        The ICF-MR program is used by states to support I/DD housing programs in both smaller (up to 16 residents) and larger (16 residents or more) institutional settings. Individuals who live in ICFs-MR receive active treatment. In 2006, the ICF-MR program provided approximately $1.9 billion in federal funding to approximately 42,000 individuals living in public and private ICF-MR settings of up to 16 residents.

        We believe that the following factors will continue to benefit the sector, and in particular home- and community-based programs:

    Increasing life expectancy of the I/DD population—The life expectancy of individuals with I/DD increased from 59 years in the 1970s to 66 years in the 1990s and we expect this trend to continue. In addition, approximately 2.8 million individuals with I/DD are cared for by a family

3


Table of Contents

      member, and 25% of their caregivers are age 60 or older. As the caregivers grow older and are not able to provide continuous care, we expect the demand for I/DD services to expand.

    Active Litigation and Advocacy—Individuals with I/DD are supported by active and well-organized advocacy groups. Using legislation prompted by the Olmstead decision, as well as lawsuits filed on behalf of those on waiting lists for services, policy makers, civil rights lawyers, social workers and advocacy groups are forcing states to provide to individuals with I/DD the option to live and receive services in home and community-based settings. In 2006, 65,000 individuals are on formal state waiting lists to receive services funded through the HCBS Waiver program and there are more than 33 active lawsuits advocating for community integration and the reduction of HCBS waiting lists.

    Continued Closure of State Institutions—Although most of the shift from institutions to home and community-based settings has already occurred, the closure of additional state institutions is expected. There were approximately 200,000 individuals in state institutions in 1968 compared to approximately 38,000 individuals in 2006. State governments are still actively working to close many state institutions that remain open, with three institutions identified for closure by 2011. We currently provide services in each of these three markets.

At-Risk Youth and Their Families

        The ARY service market includes children with severe emotional, developmental, medical and behavioral challenges, as well as youth under the auspices of the juvenile justice system and their families. We believe that the market for ARY services is growing as a result of the expanding 0 to 19 year-old population and the fact that 40% of abused and neglected children do not receive services. ARY services are funded from a variety of sources, including Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, or The Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, Medicaid and state and local government appropriations.

        Similar to I/DD programs, there has been an increased emphasis on home and community-based alternatives for the ARY population. More states are shifting funds to private providers of these services in an attempt to purchase cost-effective, evidence-based care.

Acquired Brain Injury

        Continued advances in medical technology are resulting in an increased number of individuals surviving a traumatic ABI. Currently, 5.3 million people in the U.S. are living with a permanent disability as a result of an ABI. In addition, more than 1.4 million new ABI cases, 85,000 of which result in permanent disabilities, are expected each year.

        Both the public and private sectors finance post-acute services for individuals with ABI. Federal and state governments pay for a large portion of post-acute services, as private insurance plans limit post-acute services and typically do not pay for long-term care or community-based support. The Traumatic Brain Injury Act of 1996 allocated Medicaid dollars to improve the access, delivery and quality of ABI services. In recent years, the increase in state ABI Waiver programs that provide easier access to Medicaid funds has expanded the number of individuals who can afford ABI services. In addition, we believe that there has been a push by payors to move from high-cost institution-based settings to lower-cost outpatient and day treatment programs as soon as possible. This shift should benefit providers such as MENTOR that offer a continuum of care from physical and neurological rehabilitation to more basic long-term care services in non-institutional settings.

4


Table of Contents

Competitive strengths

        We believe that the following competitive strengths have allowed us to achieve and maintain our position as a leading provider of home and community-based services to our target population groups:

         National Platform with Diverse Payor and Program Mix.     We serve clients in 35 states and the District of Columbia, which are home to approximately 87% of the United States population, although we do not operate in all regions within those states. We believe that we deliver a level of quality and responsiveness that smaller local service providers are not always able to offer and which has helped us forge strong relationships with state and local agencies. Our extensive history of serving children and adults with a range of challenges and needs has led to the development of operational expertise in quality assurance, customer satisfaction survey implementation and analysis, outcomes measurement and risk management. Our national platform has also enabled us to implement best practices across our organization and leverage economies of scale in various direct and indirect costs. In addition, our national platform, reputation and knowledge enable us to respond quickly and efficiently to new opportunities. As a result, we have expanded our markets and entered a number of new service areas, including ABI, early childhood autism programs, early intervention programs and non-residential therapeutic schools. Finally, the more than 30 different types of programs that we offer, coupled with our diverse base of state and county payors, stabilize our revenue base and mitigate the impact of changes in public policy, rates or reimbursement policies in any particular state, county or program.

         Client-Oriented Care Model.     We have the expertise to design customized service plans to meet the unique needs of our clients in community-based settings. We specialize in adapting our service offerings to a wide range of intensities of care and other client requirements, as well as in providing cost-effective services that are accountable to clients, their families and payors. For example, our program for foster children with complex medical conditions includes individual plans of care that address each child's medical condition, as well as his or her physical and emotional needs. These children are cared for in a Mentor host home with the support of medical professionals, which we believe is better for the development of children and often a less expensive alternative for payors than hospital settings.

         Stable Revenue and Strong Cash Flow.     The extended length of care inherent in our I/DD service line, which is the largest part of our business, provides us with a stable, recurring base of revenue. Clients with I/DD live in our homes for an average of approximately eight years, and the increased life expectancy of the I/DD population, as described above, is extending the average length of stay in our homes. Life expectancy and the services available for individuals with ABI have also increased as a result of improved medical resources and technology, providing additional stability to our revenue base. Furthermore, our business model has required capital expenditures of approximately 2% of net revenues per year and has modest working capital needs.

         Flexible Cost Structure.     We believe that our fixed costs are lower than those of large institutional care providers, enabling us to respond quickly to market developments and regulatory changes. A substantial portion of our caregivers are hourly employees or independently contracted clinicians and Mentors, which allows us to quickly respond to changes in our staffing needs. Our group homes consist of a mix of owned residential real estate and leased real estate. We believe that the structure of our real estate portfolio allows us to respond quickly to changes in our service levels.

         Experienced and Committed Management Team and Equity Sponsor.     Our management team, having served previously as policy makers, fiscal managers and service providers, has extensive public and private sector experience in human services. Our senior management team has been with us for an average of thirteen years and averages approximately twenty-three years in the human services industry. Members of our management team have helped us to grow our net revenues from $141.0 million in fiscal 1998 to $962.9 million in fiscal 2008 through organic growth and the integration of 46

5


Table of Contents


acquisitions. In connection with the Merger (defined below), the Company's executive officers, a director and certain other members of management (together, the "management investors") made a significant equity contribution of approximately $11.6 million. In addition, our equity sponsor, Vestar, has considerable experience making investments in a wide variety of industries, including healthcare.

Our strategy

        We believe home and community-based human services that increase client independence and participation in community life while reducing payor costs will continue to grow in market share. We intend to continue to capitalize on these trends, both in existing markets and in new markets where we believe significant opportunities exist. The primary aspects of our strategy include the following:

         Grow our Census and Expand our Services in Existing Markets.     We intend to expand our census in existing markets where we leverage our reputation for high-quality, innovative services and our relationships with referral sources to serve new individuals and families. We also intend to continue to cross-sell new services, which involves starting new service lines or offering new programs in markets where we already have a well-established base of operations and relationships with existing referral sources.

         Expand our Services in New Markets.     We also intend to continue to seek new opportunities to grow in each of our service lines by leveraging our current infrastructure to expand into new territories through new program starts, or new starts. We often seek new starts through the signing of an anchor contract in a new state or region with the intention of leveraging the initial contract to expand by service line or by model. A new start typically requires a modest initial investment to fund operating losses with the goal of achieving profitability within 18-24 months. Since the inception of our new start program in fiscal 2002, through the end of fiscal 2008, we have launched 105 new starts that are currently operational, including 14 during fiscal 2008.

         Continue to Strengthen our Third-Party Payor Relationships.     Much of our organic growth in recent years has resulted from the strength of our relationships with state and local government agencies. Our relationships with these payors have enabled us to gain contract referrals and to cross-sell new services into existing markets. We continue to strengthen these relationships by providing quality assurance, reporting and billing programs designed to serve the needs of third-party payors. We seek to position ourselves as the provider of choice to state and local governments and other third-party payors by finding solutions to their most challenging human service delivery problems.

         Selectively Pursue Acquisitions.     Members of our management team have a record of identifying, pursuing and successfully integrating acquisitions, having completed more than 25 acquisitions since 2003. We have selectively supplemented our organic growth through acquisitions which have allowed us to penetrate new geographies, enter new service lines, leverage our systems, operating costs and best practices, and pursue cross-selling opportunities. We monitor the market nationally for human service businesses that we can purchase at an attractive price and efficiently "tuck-in" to our existing operations. We believe we are often seen as a preferred acquiror in these situations due to our experience, relationships, infrastructure and reputation for quality. We intend to continue to pursue acquisitions that are philosophically compatible and can be readily integrated into our existing operations.

         Expand into Related Services and Programs.     We intend to continue to evaluate opportunities to provide services to additional population groups in the human services industry. We believe that our broad range of services, relationships with third-party payors, reputation for quality care and infrastructure give us the ability to expand the number of clients we serve in a cost-effective manner. We have successfully entered new service lines, including ABI, and program areas, including early childhood autism programs, early intervention and non-residential therapeutic schools. As we continue

6


Table of Contents


to strengthen existing services, we will use our clinical skills, personnel and experience to provide new, related services.

    Recent Acquisitions

        During fiscal 2008, we acquired one company for a total purchase price of $9.0 million. For additional information on the acquisition made during fiscal 2008, see note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Certain Transactions

        On June 29, 2006, NMH MergerSub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NMH Investment, merged with and into the Company, and the Company was the surviving corporation (the "Merger"). Vestar, certain affiliates of Vestar and members of management and certain directors own NMH Investment, and therefore own the Company. In connection with the Merger, we entered into new senior secured credit facilities consisting of a $335.0 million seven-year senior secured term loan facility, a $125.0 million six-year senior secured revolving credit facility, and a $20.0 million seven-year senior secured synthetic letter of credit facility. We also issued $180.0 million of notes, which are guaranteed by our subsidiaries, except for our captive insurance subsidiary and our non-profit subsidiaries. For additional information on this transaction, see note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

        On July 5, 2007, NMH Holdings, Inc. ("NMH Holdings"), our indirect parent company, issued $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior floating rate toggle notes. These notes are unsecured and are not guaranteed by the Company or any of its affiliates. NMH Holdings used the proceeds from this offering to pay a dividend to its parent NMH Investment, which was used by NMH Investment to pay a return of capital with respect to its preferred units and to pay fees and expenses related to the offering. For additional information on this transaction, see note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Our Sponsor

        Vestar is a leading private equity firm specializing in management buyouts and growth capital investments. Vestar's investment in National Mentor Holdings, Inc. was initially funded by Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P., a $3.7 billion fund which closed in 2006, and an affiliate.

        See "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence" and "Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters" for additional information.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Current credit and financial markets conditions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, liquidity and financial condition.

        Due to the recent tightening of the credit markets, our government payors could be delayed in obtaining, or may not be able to obtain, necessary financing to meet their cash-flow needs, including paying us for our services, until they collect sufficient tax revenues. Delays of this nature could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, liquidity and financial condition. In addition, in the event that our payors delay payments to us, our financial condition could be further impaired if we are unable, under existing credit agreements, to borrow funds to finance our operations.

7


Table of Contents

Reductions or changes in Medicaid funding or changes in budgetary priorities by the state and local governments that pay for our services could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

        We derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with state and local governments. These governmental payors fund a significant portion of their payments to us through Medicaid, a joint federal/state health insurance program through which state expenditures are matched by federal dollars ranging from 50% to more than 77% of total costs, a number based largely on a state's per capita income. Our revenues, therefore, are determined by the size of federal, state and local governmental spending for the services we provide. Budgetary pressures, particularly during recessionary periods, as well as other economic, industry, political and other factors, could cause the federal and state governments to limit spending, which could significantly reduce our revenues, margins and profitability and adversely affect our growth strategy. If the current economic crisis continues, we expect budgetary pressure on federal, state and local governments to increase, and, as a result, certain appropriations could be reduced. Governmental agencies generally condition their contracts with us upon a sufficient budgetary appropriation. If a government agency does not receive an appropriation sufficient to cover its contractual obligations with us, it may terminate a contract or defer or reduce our reimbursement. In addition, there is risk that previously appropriated funds could be reduced through subsequent legislation. Many states in which we operate have experienced budgetary pressures from time to time and, during these times, some of these states have initiated service reductions, rate freezes and/or rate reductions. Similarly, programmatic changes such as conversions to managed care with related contract demands regarding billing and services, unbundling of services, governmental efforts to increase consumer autonomy and reduce provider oversight, coverage and other changes under state Medicaid plans, may cause unanticipated costs and risks to our service delivery. The loss or reduction of or changes to reimbursement under our contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Failure to obtain increases in reimbursement rates could adversely affect our revenues, cash flows and profitability.

        Our revenues and operating profitability depend on our ability to maintain our existing reimbursement levels and to obtain periodic increases in reimbursement rates to meet higher costs and demand for more services. Approximately 13% of our revenue is derived from contracts based on a cost reimbursement model where we are reimbursed for our services based on our costs plus an agreed-upon margin. If we are not entitled to, do not receive or cannot negotiate increases in reimbursement rates at approximately the same time as our costs of providing services increase, including labor costs and rent, our margins and profitability could be adversely affected. Changes in how federal and state government agencies operate reimbursement programs can also affect our operating results and financial condition. Some states have, from time to time, revised their rate-setting or methodologies in a manner that has resulted in rate decreases. In some instances, changes in rate-setting methodologies have resulted in third-party payors disallowing, in whole or in part, our requests for reimbursement. Any reduction in or the failure to maintain or increase our reimbursement rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Changes in the manner in which state agencies interpret program policies and procedures or review and audit billings and costs could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results and our ability to meet obligations under our indebtedness.

Our variable cost structure is directly related to our labor costs, which may be adversely affected by labor shortages or deterioration in labor relations.

        Our variable cost structure and operating profitability are directly related to our labor costs. Labor costs may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including a limited supply of qualified personnel

8


Table of Contents


in any geographic area, local competitive forces, the ineffective utilization of our labor force, increases in minimum wages, health care costs and other personnel costs, and adverse changes in client service models. Some of our operating units have incurred higher labor costs in certain markets from time to time because of difficulty in hiring qualified direct service staff. These higher labor costs have resulted from increased wages and overtime and the costs associated with recruitment and retention, training programs and use of temporary staffing personnel. In part to help with the challenge of recruiting and retaining direct care employees, we offer these employees a benefits package that includes paid time off, health insurance, dental insurance, vision coverage, life insurance and a 401(k) plan, and these costs can be significant.

        Our employees are generally not unionized. However, as of September 30, 2008, eighteen of our employees were represented by a labor union. We may not be able to negotiate labor agreements on satisfactory terms with our existing or any future labor unions. In addition, future unionization activities may result in an increase of our labor and other costs. If any of the employees covered by collective bargaining agreements were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, we could experience a disruption of our operations and/or higher ongoing labor costs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry.

        We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of September 30, 2008, we had total indebtedness of approximately $513.9 million and $122.0 million of availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility. The senior secured credit facilities also include a $20.0 million synthetic letter of credit facility, all of which has been fully utilized. The availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility was reduced from $125.0 million as letters of credit in excess of $20.0 million under our synthetic letters of credit facility were outstanding.

        In addition, on October 14, 2008, we drew $40.0 million of funds from the senior secured revolving credit facility. A portion of the funds were used for the earn-out payment related to the CareMeridian acquisition which was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes and potential acquisitions.

        In addition to our indebtedness noted above, on July 5, 2007, NMH Holdings issued $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior floating rate toggle notes due 2014.

        Our substantial degree of leverage could have important consequences, including the following:

    it may limit our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions, and general corporate or other purposes;

    a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and will not be available for other purposes, including our operations, future business opportunities and capital expenditures;

    the debt service requirements of our indebtedness could make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations;

    a portion of our borrowings under the secured credit facilities is at variable rates of interest, exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates;

    it may limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt and a lower degree of leverage; and

9


Table of Contents

    we may be vulnerable if the current downturn in general economic conditions continues or if there is a downturn in our business, or we may be unable to carry out activities that are important to our growth.

        NMH Holdings is a holding company with no direct operations. Its principal assets are the direct and indirect equity interests it holds in its subsidiaries, including us, and all of its operations are conducted through us and our subsidiaries. As a result, NMH Holdings will be dependent upon dividends and other payments from us to generate the funds necessary to meet its outstanding debt service and other obligations. After giving effect to the offering of the senior floating rate toggle notes due 2014 and excluding the debt of its subsidiaries, NMH Holdings had $200.6 million aggregate principal amount of indebtedness outstanding as of September 30, 2008, consisting entirely of the NMH Holdings notes. NMH Holdings has paid all of the interest payments to date on the notes entirely in PIK Interest (defined below) which increased the principal amount by $25.6 million. NMH Holdings currently expects to elect to pay entirely by increasing the principal amount of the NMH Holdings notes or issuing new notes ("PIK Interest") through June 15, 2012.

        Subject to restrictions in the indentures governing our senior subordinated notes and the NMH Holdings notes and the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities, we may be able to incur more debt in the future, which may intensify the risks described in this risk factor. All of the borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. The NMH Holdings notes are structurally subordinated to the senior subordinated notes and the senior secured credit facilities.

        In addition to our high level of indebtedness, we have significant rental obligations under our operating leases for our group homes, other service facilities and administrative offices. For the year ended September 30, 2008, our aggregate rental payments for these leases, including taxes and operating expenses, was approximately $38.8 million. These obligations could further increase the risks described above.

Covenants in our debt agreements restrict our business in many ways.

        The senior secured credit facilities, the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes and the indenture governing the NMH Holdings notes contain various covenants that limit our ability and/or our subsidiaries' ability to, among other things:

    incur additional debt or issue certain preferred shares;

    pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make other restricted payments;

    make certain investments;

    sell certain assets;

    create liens on certain assets to secure debt;

    enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries;

    consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and

    enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

        The senior secured credit facilities also contain restrictive covenants and require the Company and its subsidiaries to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and tests may be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those tests. The breach of any of these covenants or financial ratios could result in a default under the senior secured credit facilities and the lenders could elect to

10


Table of Contents


declare all amounts borrowed thereunder, together with accrued interest, to be due and payable and could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness.

The nature of our operations could subject us to substantial claims, some of which may not be fully insured against or reserved for.

        We are in the human services business and, therefore, we have been and continue to be subject to claims alleging that we, our Mentors or our employees failed to provide proper care for a client, as well as claims by our clients, our Mentors, our employees or community members against us for negligence or intentional misconduct. Included in our recent claims are claims alleging personal injury, assault, battery, abuse, wrongful death and other charges. Regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging that our programs, employees or agents violate statutes and regulations and seek to impose monetary penalties on us. We could be required to incur significant costs to respond to regulatory investigations or defend against civil lawsuits and, if we do not prevail, we could be required to pay substantial amounts of money in damages, settlement amounts or penalties arising from these legal proceedings. We currently insure through our captive subsidiary amounts of up to $1.0 million per claim and up to $2.0 million in the aggregate. Above these limits, we have limited additional third-party coverage. Awards for punitive damages may be excluded from our insurance policies either contractually or by operation of state law.

        We also are subject to potential lawsuits under the False Claims Act or other federal and state whistleblower statutes designed to combat fraud and abuse in the health care industry. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary awards and bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. Finally, we are also subject to employee-related claims including wrongful discharge or discrimination, a violation of equal employment law, the Fair Labor Standards Act or state wage and hour laws and novel intentional tort claims.

        A litigation award excluded by, or in excess of, our third-party insurance limits and self-insurance reserves could have a material adverse impact on our operations and cash flow and could adversely impact our ability to continue to purchase appropriate liability insurance. Even if we are successful in our defense, civil lawsuits or regulatory proceedings could also irreparably damage our reputation.

Because a substantial portion of NMH Holdings and our indebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain prevailing short-term interest rates, we are vulnerable to interest rate increases.

        A substantial portion of our indebtedness, including borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility, a portion of our borrowings under the senior secured term loan facility, and the indebtedness of NMH Holdings under the NMH Holdings notes, bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain short-term prevailing interest rates. If interest rates increase, our and NMH Holdings' debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same.

        As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $10.1 million of floating rate debt outstanding after giving effect to interest rate swaps. As of September 30, 2008, NMH Holdings had $198.5 million of floating rate debt outstanding, net of discount, after giving effect to the offering of the NMH Holdings notes and excluding the debt of its subsidiaries. A 1% increase in the interest rate on our floating rate debt would have increased cash interest expense of the floating rate debt by approximately $0.1 million, and a 1% increase in the interest rate on the NMH Holdings notes would have increased NMH Holdings' interest expense on those notes by approximately $2.0 million. If interest rates increase dramatically, NMH Holdings and the Company and its subsidiaries could be unable to service their debt.

11


Table of Contents


The nature of services that we provide could subject us to significant workers' compensation related liability, some of which may not be fully reserved for.

        We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance plans to provide for potential liability for workers' compensation claims. Because of our high ratio of employees per client, and because of the inherent physical risk associated with the interaction of employees with I/DD, ARY and ABI clients, the potential for incidents giving rise to workers' compensation liability is relatively high.

        We estimate liabilities associated with workers' compensation risk and establish reserves each quarter based on internal valuations, third-party actuarial advice, historical loss development factors and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our results of operations could be adversely impacted if actual future occurrences and claims exceed our assumptions and historical trends.

If any of the state and local government agencies with which we have contracts determines that we have not complied with our contracts or violated any applicable laws or regulations, our revenues may decrease, we may be subject to fines or penalties and we may be required to restructure our billing and collection methods.

        We derive virtually all of our revenues from state and local government agencies, and a substantial portion of these revenues is state-funded with federal Medicaid matching dollars. As a result of our participation in these government-funded programs, we are routinely subject to governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify our compliance with applicable laws and regulations. As a result of these reviews, audits and investigations, these governmental payors may be entitled to, in their discretion:

    require us to refund amounts we have previously been paid;

    terminate or modify our existing contracts;

    suspend or prevent us from receiving new contracts or extending existing contracts;

    impose referral holds on us;

    impose fines, penalties or other sanctions on us; and

    reduce the amount we are paid under our existing contracts.

        As a result of past reviews and audits of our operations, we have been subject to some of these actions from time to time. While we do not currently believe that our existing audit proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or significantly harm our reputation, we cannot assure you that similar actions in the future will not do so. In addition, such proceedings could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations in a future reporting period.

        In some states, we operate on a cost reimbursement model in which revenues are recognized at the time costs are incurred. In these states, payors audit our historical costs on a regular basis, and if it is determined that our historical costs are insufficient to justify our rates, our rates may be reduced, or we may be required to retroactively return fees paid to us. In some cases we have experienced negative audit adjustments which are based on subjective judgments of reasonableness, necessity or allocation of costs in our services provided to clients. These adjustments are generally required to be negotiated as part of the overall audit resolution and may result in paybacks to payors and adjustments of the rates. We cannot assure you that our rates will be maintained, or that we will be able to keep all payments made to us, until an audit of the relevant period is complete. Moreover, if we are required to restructure our billing and collection methods, these changes could be disruptive to our operations and costly to implement.

12


Table of Contents

If we fail to establish and maintain relationships with state and local government agencies, we may not be able to successfully procure or retain government-sponsored contracts, which could negatively impact our revenues.

        To facilitate our ability to procure or retain government-sponsored contracts, we rely in part on establishing and maintaining relationships with officials of various government agencies. These relationships enable us to maintain and renew existing contracts and obtain new contracts and referrals. The effectiveness of our relationships may be reduced or eliminated with changes in the personnel holding various government offices or staff positions. We also may lose key personnel who have these relationships and such personnel are generally not subject to non-compete or non-solicitation covenants. Any failure to establish, maintain or manage relationships with government and agency personnel may hinder our ability to procure or retain government-sponsored contracts.

Negative publicity or changes in public perception of our services may adversely affect our ability to obtain new contracts and renew existing ones.

        Our success in obtaining new contracts and renewals of our existing contracts depends upon maintaining our reputation as a quality service provider among governmental authorities, advocacy groups, families of our clients and the public. Negative publicity, changes in public perception and government investigations with respect to our operations could damage our reputation and hinder our ability to retain contracts and obtain new contracts, and could reduce referrals, increase government scrutiny and compliance costs, or generally discourage clients from using our services. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We face substantial competition in attracting and retaining experienced personnel, and we may be unable to maintain or grow our business if we cannot attract and retain qualified employees.

        Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to attract and retain qualified and experienced human service professionals who possess the skills and experience necessary to deliver quality services to our clients and manage our operations. We face competition for certain categories of our employees, particularly service provider employees, based on the wages, benefits and other working conditions we offer. Contractual requirements and client needs determine the number, education and experience levels of human service professionals we hire. Our ability to attract and retain employees with the requisite credentials, experience and skills depends on several factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. The inability to attract and retain experienced personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any future acquisitions and we may experience difficulties in integrating these acquisitions.

        As part of our growth strategy, we intend to make selective acquisitions. Growing our business through acquisitions involves risks because with any acquisition there is the possibility that:

    we may be unable to maintain and renew the contracts of the acquired business;

    unforeseen difficulties may arise in integrating the acquired operations, including information systems and accounting controls;

    we may not achieve operating efficiencies, synergies, economies of scale and cost reductions as expected;

    the business we acquire may not continue to generate income at the same historical levels on which we based our acquisition decision;

13


Table of Contents

    management may be distracted from overseeing existing operations by the need to integrate the acquired business;

    we may acquire or assume unexpected liabilities or there may be other unanticipated costs;

    we may encounter unanticipated regulatory risk;

    we may experience problems entering new markets or service lines in which we have limited or no experience;

    we may fail to retain and assimilate key employees of the acquired business;

    we may finance the acquisition by incurring additional debt and further increase our leverage ratios; and

    the culture of the acquired business may not match well with our culture.

        As a result of these risks, there can be no assurance that any future acquisition will be successful or that it will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A loss of our status as a licensed service provider in any jurisdiction could result in the termination of existing services and our inability to market our services in that jurisdiction.

        We operate in numerous jurisdictions and are required to maintain licenses and certifications in order to conduct our operations in each of them. Each state and local government has its own regulations, which can be complicated, and each of our service lines can be regulated differently within a particular jurisdiction. As a result, maintaining the necessary licenses and certifications to conduct our operations can be cumbersome. Our licenses and certifications could be suspended, revoked or terminated for a number of reasons, including:

    the failure by our employees or Mentors to properly care for clients;

    the failure to submit proper documentation to the government agency, including documentation supporting reimbursements for costs;

    the failure by our programs to abide by the applicable regulations relating to the provision of human services; or

    the failure of our facilities to comply with the applicable building, health and safety codes and ordinances.

        From time to time, some of our licenses or certifications are temporarily placed on probationary status or suspended. If we lost our status as a licensed provider of human services in any jurisdiction or any other required certification, we would be unable to market our services in that jurisdiction, and the contracts under which we provide services in that jurisdiction would be subject to termination. Moreover, such an event could constitute a violation of provisions of contracts in other jurisdictions, resulting in other contract, license or certification terminations. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations, which require significant compliance expenditures, and a failure to comply with these regulations could adversely affect our business.

        We must comply with comprehensive government regulation of our business, including statutes, regulations and policies governing the licensing of our facilities, the maintenance and management of our work place for our employees, the quality of our service, the revenues we receive for our services, and reimbursement for the cost of our services. Compliance with these laws, regulations and policies is expensive, and if we fail to comply with these laws, regulations and policies, we could lose contracts and the related revenues, thereby harming our financial results. State and federal regulatory agencies

14


Table of Contents


have broad discretionary powers over the administration and enforcement of laws and regulations that govern our operations. A material violation of a law or regulation could subject us to fines and penalties and in some circumstances could disqualify some or all of the facilities and programs under our control from future participation in Medicaid or other government programs. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), which requires the establishment of privacy standards for health care information storage, retrieval and dissemination as well as electronic transmission and security standards, could result in potential penalties in certain of our businesses if we fail to comply with these privacy and security standards.

        Expenses incurred under governmental agency contracts for any of our services, as well as management contracts with providers of record for such agencies, are subject to review by agencies administering the contracts and services. Representatives of those agencies visit our group homes to verify compliance with state and local regulations governing our home operations. A negative outcome from any of these examinations could increase government scrutiny, increase compliance costs or hinder our ability to obtain or retain contracts. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

        In connection with our internal controls assessment required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as reported in Item 9AT of this annual report on Form 10-K, we have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Management concluded that as of September 30, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective and, as a result, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. Descriptions of the material weaknesses are included in Item 9AT of this annual report on Form 10-K. While we have taken action and continue to take actions to remediate our previously identified material weaknesses, our new policies and procedures, when implemented, may not be effective in remedying all of the deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. The decentralized nature of our operations, and the manual nature of many of our controls, make compliance with the requirements of Section 404 and remediation of our material weaknesses especially challenging. We expect that the implementation of our new billing and accounts receivable system will affect a number of processes that impact our internal control over financial reporting, however we may identify additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in connection with this implementation. A failure to remedy our material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Moreover, our conclusion in this report that our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, and any future disclosures of additional material weaknesses, may result in a negative reaction in the financial markets if there is a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial reporting.

        We have extensive work remaining to remedy the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and until our remediation efforts are completed, management will continue to devote significant time and attention to these efforts. We will continue to incur costs associated with implementing additional processes, including fees for additional auditor services and consulting services, and may be required to incur additional costs in improving our internal controls and hiring additional personnel, which could negatively affect our financial condition and operating results.

The high level of competition in our industry could adversely affect our contract and revenue base.

        We compete with a wide variety of competitors, ranging from small, local agencies to a few large, national organizations. Competitive factors may favor other providers and reduce our ability to obtain contracts, which would hinder our growth. Not-for-profit organizations are active in all states and range from small agencies serving a limited area with specific programs to multi-state organizations. Smaller local organizations may have a better understanding of the local conditions and may be better able to

15


Table of Contents


gain political and public acceptance. Not-for-profit providers may be affiliated with advocacy groups, health organizations or religious organizations that have substantial influence with legislators and government agencies. Increased competition may result in pricing pressures, loss of or failure to gain market share or loss of clients or payors, any of which could harm our business.

We rely on third parties to refer clients to our facilities and programs.

        We receive substantially all of our clients from third-party referrals and are governed by the federal anti-kickback/non-self referral statute. Our reputation and prior experience with agency staff, care workers and others in positions to make referrals to us are important for building and maintaining our operations. Any event that harms our reputation or creates negative experiences with such third parties could impact our ability to receive referrals and grow our client base.

Home and community-based human services may become less popular among our targeted client populations and/or state and local governments, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

        Our growth depends on the continuation of trends in our industry toward providing services to individuals in smaller, community-based settings and increasing the percentage of individuals served by non-governmental providers. The continuation of these trends and our future success are subject to a variety of political, economic, social and legal pressures, all of which are beyond our control. A reversal in the downsizing and privatization trends could reduce the demand for our services, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

Regulations that require ARY services to be provided through not-for-profit organizations could harm our revenues or gross margin.

        Approximately 3% of our net revenues for fiscal 2008 were derived from contracts with affiliates of Alliance Health and Human Services, Inc., or "Alliance," an independent not-for-profit organization that has licenses and contracts from several state and local agencies to provide ARY services.

        Historically, some state governments have interpreted federal law to preclude them from receiving federal reimbursement under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act for ARY services provided under a contract with a proprietary organization. However, in 2005 the Fair Access Foster Care Act of 2005 was signed into law, thereby allowing states to seek reimbursement from the federal government for ARY services provided by proprietary organizations. In some jurisdictions that interpreted the prior federal law to preclude them from seeking reimbursement for ARY services provided under a contract with a proprietary provider, or in others that prefer to contract with not-for-profit providers, we provide ARY services as a subcontractor of Alliance. We do not control Alliance, and none of our employees or agents has a role in the management of Alliance. Although Edward Murphy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, was an officer and director of Alliance immediately prior to becoming our President in September 2004, Mr. Murphy has no role in the management of Alliance. Our ARY business could be harmed if Alliance chooses to discontinue all or a portion of its service agreements with us. Our ARY business could also be harmed if the state or local governments that prefer that ARY services be provided by not-for-profit organizations determine that they do not want the service performed indirectly by for-profit companies like us on behalf of not-for-profit organizations. We cannot assure you that our contracts with Alliance will continue, and if these contracts are terminated without our consent, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Alliance and its subsidiaries are organized as non-profit corporations and are recognized as tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, Alliance is subject to the public charity regulations of the states in which it operates and to the federal regulations governing tax-exempt entities. If Alliance fails to comply with the laws and regulations of the states in which it operates or with the federal regulations, it could be subject to penalties and sanctions, including the loss of tax-exempt status, which could preclude it from continuing to contract with certain state and local

16


Table of Contents


governments. Our business could be harmed if Alliance lost its contracts and was therefore unable to continue to contract with us.

Government reimbursement procedures are time-consuming and complex, and failure to comply with these procedures could adversely affect our liquidity, cash flows and operating results.

        The government reimbursement process is time-consuming and complex, and there can be delays before we receive payment. Government reimbursement, group home credentialing and Medicaid recipient eligibility and service authorization procedures are often complicated and burdensome, and delays can result from, among other things, securing documentation and coordinating necessary eligibility paperwork between agencies. These reimbursement and procedural issues occasionally cause us to have to resubmit claims several times before payment is remitted. If there is a billing error, the process to resolve the error may be time-consuming and costly. To the extent that complexity associated with billing for our services causes delays in our cash collections, we assume the financial risk of increased carrying costs associated with the aging of our accounts receivable as well as increased potential for write-offs. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to collect payment for claims at our current levels in future periods. The risks associated with third-party payors and the inability to monitor and manage accounts receivable successfully could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, cash flows and operating results.

We conduct a significant percentage of our operations in Minnesota and, as a result, we are particularly susceptible to any reduction in budget appropriations for our services or any other adverse developments in that state.

        For fiscal 2008, approximately 16% of our revenues were generated from contracts with government agencies in the state of Minnesota. Accordingly, any reduction in Minnesota's budgetary appropriations for our services, whether as a result of fiscal constraints due to recession, changes in policy or otherwise, could result in a reduction in our fees and possibly the loss of contracts. In the past, our operations in Minnesota were subject to rate reductions, although recently we have received rate increases. The concentration of our operations in Minnesota also makes us particularly susceptible to many of the other risks described above occurring in this state, including:

    the failure to maintain and renew our licenses;

    the failure to maintain important relationships with officials of government agencies; and

    any negative publicity regarding our operations.

        Any of these adverse developments occurring in Minnesota could result in a reduction in revenue or a loss of contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

We depend upon the continued services of certain members of our senior management team, without whom our business operations could be significantly disrupted.

        Our success depends, in part, on the continued contributions of our executive officers and other key employees. Our management team has significant industry experience and would be difficult to replace. If we lose or suffer an extended interruption in the service of one or more of our senior officers, our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. The market for qualified individuals is highly competitive and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace or succeed members of our senior management or other key employees, should the need arise.

17


Table of Contents

Our success depends on our ability to manage growing and changing operations.

        Since 1998, our business has grown significantly in size and complexity. This growth has placed, and is expected to continue to place, significant demands on our management, systems, internal controls and financial and physical resources. Our operations are highly decentralized, with many billing, accounting, collection and payment functions being performed at the local level. This requires us to expend significant resources implementing and monitoring compliance at the local level. In addition, we expect that we will need to further develop our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems to accommodate future growth. This will require us to incur expenses for hiring additional qualified personnel, retaining professionals to assist in developing the appropriate control systems and expanding our information technology infrastructure. The nature of our business is such that qualified management personnel can be difficult to find. Our inability to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

We may be more susceptible to the effects of a public health catastrophe than other businesses due to the vulnerable nature of our client population.

        Our primary clients are individuals with developmental disabilities, brain injuries, or emotionally, behaviorally or medically complex challenges, many of whom may be more vulnerable than the general public in a public health catastrophe. For example, if a flu pandemic were to occur we could suffer significant losses to our client population and, at a high cost, be required to hire replacement staff and Mentors for workers who drop out of the workforce in very tight labor markets. Accordingly, certain public health catastrophes such as a flu pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are controlled by our principal equityholder, which has the power to take unilateral action.

        Vestar controls our business affairs and policies. Circumstances may occur in which the interests of Vestar could be in conflict with the interests of our debt holders. In addition, Vestar may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to our debt holders. Vestar is in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Vestar may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. So long as investment funds associated with or designated by Vestar continue to own a significant amount of our equity interests, even if such amount is less than 50%, Vestar will continue to be able to significantly influence or effectively control our decisions.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        Not applicable.

Item 2.    Properties

        Our principal executive office is located at 313 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. We operate a number of facilities and administrative offices throughout the United States. As of September 30, 2008, we provided services in 405 owned facilities and 860 leased facilities, as well as in homes owned by our Mentors. We also own two offices and lease 282 offices. We believe that our properties are adequate for our business as presently conducted and we believe we can meet requirements for additional space by extending leases that expire or by finding alternative space.

18


Table of Contents


Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

        We are in the human services business and, therefore, we have been and continue to be subject to claims alleging that we, our Mentors or our employees failed to provide proper care for a client. We are also subject to claims by our clients, our Mentors, our employees or community members against us for negligence, intentional misconduct or violation of employment laws. Included in our recent claims are claims alleging personal injury, assault, battery, abuse, wrongful death and other charges. Regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging that our programs, employees or agents violate statutes and regulations and seek to impose monetary penalties on us. We could be required to incur significant costs to respond to regulatory investigations or defend against civil lawsuits and, if we do not prevail, we could be required to pay substantial amounts of money in damages, settlement amounts or penalties arising from these legal proceedings.

        We reserve for costs related to contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. While we believe our provision for legal contingencies is adequate, the outcome of the legal proceedings is difficult to predict and we may settle legal claims or be subject to judgments for amounts that differ from our estimates.

        See "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for additional information.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        Not applicable.

19


Table of Contents


PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

        We are an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NMH Investment. Accordingly, there is no public trading market for our common stock.

Stockholders

        There was one owner of record of our common stock as of December 1, 2008.

Dividends

        We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then-existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. In addition, our current financing arrangements effectively prohibit us from paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table lists the number of securities available for issuance as of December 1, 2008 under the NMH Investment, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Unit Plan. For a description of the plan, please see note 21 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Plan Category
  Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options
(a)
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options
(b)
  Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
under Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

    N/A     N/A     Preferred Units: 7,812.66
A Units: 78,126.61
B Units: 4,995.33
C Units: 5,241.90
D Units: 15,172.30
E Units: 6,375.00
 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   
N/A
   
N/A
   

N/A

 

TOTAL

   
   
   

Preferred Units: 7,812.66
A Units: 78,126.61
B Units: 4,995.33
C Units: 5,241.90
D Units: 15,172.30
E Units: 6,375.00

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

        No equity securities of the Company were sold during fiscal 2008.

20


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth the number of units of common equity of NMH Investment granted during fiscal 2008 pursuant to the NMH Investment, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Unit Plan, as amended. The units were granted under Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.

Dates
  Title of Securities   Amount   Purchasers   Consideration  

August 22 and 25, 2008

    Class B Common Units     17,912.17     Executive officers   $ 895.61  

    Class C Common Units     18,796.10     and certain   $ 563.88  

    Class D Common Units     177,305.08     employees   $ 1,773.05  

September 24, 2008

    Class B Common Units     481.25     Executive officer   $ 24.06  

    Class C Common Units     505.00         $ 15.15  

    Class D Common Units     8,404.62         $ 84.05  

Repurchases of Equity Securities

        No equity securities of the Company were repurchased during fiscal 2008.

        The following table sets forth information in connection with repurchases made by NMH Investment of its common equity units during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008:

 
  (a) Class and
Total Number of
Units Purchased
  (b) Average Price
Paid per Unit
  (c) Total Number of
Units Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  (d) Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that
May Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
 

Month #1 (July 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008)

                 

Month #2 (August 1, 2008 through August 31, 2008)

                 

Month #3 (September 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008)

    962.50 B Units   $ 0.05         N/A  

    1,010.00 C Units   $ 0.03         N/A  

    1,070.00 D Units   $ 0.01         N/A  

        We did not repurchase any of our common stock as part of an equity repurchase program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. NMH Investment purchased all of the units listed in the table from one of our employees upon this employee's departure.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

        We have derived the selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the periods from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 and from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and as of and for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 from the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

21


Table of Contents

        We have derived the selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 from the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related notes not included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        The selected information below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the historical consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report.

 
  Predecessor(1)   Successor  
 
  Year Ended
September 30,
  Period From
October 1
Through
June 29,
2006
  Period From
June 30
Through
September 30,
2006
  Year Ended
September 30,
 
(dollars in thousands)
  2004   2005   2007   2008  

Statements of Operations Data:

                                     

Net revenues

  $ 648,493   $ 693,826   $ 580,356   $ 208,881   $ 910,099   $ 962,929  

Cost of revenues

    491,884     524,618     439,878     160,164     688,939     732,298  
                           

Gross profit

    156,609     169,208     140,478     48,717     221,160     230,631  

General and administrative expenses

    86,856     93,491     78,608     29,738     122,980     135,116  

Stock option settlement

            26,880              

Depreciation and amortization

    21,484     21,743     17,539     11,714     50,748     51,625  

Transaction costs

            9,136              
                           

Income from operations

    48,269     53,974     8,315     7,265     47,432     43,890  

Management fee of related party

    (257 )   (270 )   (198 )   (227 )   (892 )   (1,349 )

Other expense, net

    (2,581 )   (192 )   (177 )   (60 )   (416 )   (875 )

Interest income

    68     661     646     256     1,060     684  

Interest expense

    (26,893 )   (29,905 )   (51,719 )   (13,120 )   (50,159 )   (48,433 )
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

    18,606     24,268     (43,133 )   (5,886 )   (2,975 )   (6,083 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    8,423     10,270     (11,347 )   (2,222 )   (483 )   (177 )
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    10,183     13,998     (31,786 )   (3,664 )   (2,492 )   (5,906 )
                           

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                        (1,329 )
                           

Net income (loss)

  $ 10,183   $ 13,998   $ (31,786 ) $ (3,664 ) $ (2,492 ) $ (7,235 )
                           

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):

                                     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 22,565   $ 24,707         $ 26,511   $ 29,373   $ 38,908  

Working capital(2)

    39,828     49,190           55,423     57,297     55,878  

Total assets

    450,038     449,438           1,000,665     1,012,628     1,016,433  

Long-term debt(3)

    200,083     319,430           517,001     512,300     509,984  

Redeemable Class A preferred stock

    116,381                        

Shareholders' equity

    25,769     36,310           248,868     246,031     237,128  

(1)
On June 29, 2006, the Company changed ownership. The previous ownership periods are deemed to be predecessor periods pursuant to Rule 3-05 of Regulation S-X.

(2)
Working capital is calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets.

(3)
Long-term debt includes obligations under capital leases.

22


Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

         The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data" and the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our services and our future results. We based these statements on assumptions that we consider reasonable. Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by our forward-looking statements for various reasons, including those discussed in the "Risk factors" and "Forward-looking statements" sections of this report.

         The results for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, which we refer to as "fiscal 2006," were derived by the mathematical addition of the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 and the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006. This presentation of financial information for fiscal 2006 herein may yield results that are not fully comparable on a period-to-period basis, particularly related to the depreciation and amortization, interest expense and tax provision accounts, primarily due to the impact of the Merger and the related transactions on June 29, 2006 (the "Transactions"). This presentation is consistent with the way management uses this information internally.

    Overview

        Founded in 1980, we are a leading provider of home and community-based human services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities ("I/DD"), at-risk children and youth with emotional, behavioral or medically complex needs and their families ("ARY"), and persons with an acquired brain injury ("ABI"). As of September 30, 2008, we provided our services to more than 23,000 clients in 35 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 16,200 full-time equivalent employees. Most of our services involve residential support, typically in small group homes, ICFs-MR or host home settings, designed to improve our clients' quality of life and to promote client independence and participation in community life. Our non-residential services consist primarily of day programs and periodic services in various settings. We derive most of our revenues from state and county governmental payors, as well as smaller amounts from private sector payors, mostly in our ABI services.

        The largest part of our business is the delivery of services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Our I/DD programs include residential support, day habilitation, vocational services, case management, home health care and personal care. We also provide a variety of services to children with severe emotional, developmental, medical and behavioral challenges, as well as youth involved in the juvenile justice system, all of whom we refer to as at-risk youth, and to their families. Our ARY services include therapeutic foster care, independent living, family reunification, family preservation, alternative schools and adoption services. We also provide a range of post-acute treatment and care services to individuals with an acquired brain injury. Our ABI services range from post-acute care to assisted independent living and include neurobehavioral rehabilitation, neurorehabilitation, adolescent integration, outpatient or day treatment and pre-vocational services.

        We operate our business as one human services reporting segment with two operating groups: the Cambridge Operating Group and the Redwood Operating Group. Our service lines do not represent operating segments under Financial Accounting Standard No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131) as management does not internally evaluate the operating performance or review the results of the service lines to assess performance or make decisions about allocating resources. Also, discrete financial information is not available by service line at the level necessary for management to assess the performance or make resource allocation decisions. For additional information, see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

23


Table of Contents

        As detailed in note 1 in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, on June 29, 2006, we were merged with a wholly owned subsidiary of NMH Investment. The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141). Under purchase accounting, fixed assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values. We have accounted for the Merger in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 54, Push Down Accounting (SAB 54), whereby NMH Holdings, LLC has "pushed down" the purchase price in revaluing our assets and liabilities.

        Also included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, in fiscal 2008, we sold the business we had operated as Integrity Home Health Care ("Integrity") and our business operation in the state of Oklahoma ("Oklahoma Mentor"). We recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $2.1 million, or approximately $1.3 million after taxes. Both Integrity's and Oklahoma Mentor's results of operations and net assets are immaterial and, as a result, the results of operations and financial position are not reported separately as discontinued operations for the periods presented. All assets and liabilities have been disposed of as of September 30, 2008.

Factors Affecting our Operating Results

    Demand for Home and Community-Based Human Services

        Our growth in revenues has been directly related to increases in the rates we receive for our services as well as increases in the number of individuals served. This growth has depended largely upon development-driven activities, including the maintenance and expansion of existing contracts and the award of new contracts, and upon acquisitions. We also attribute the continued growth in our client base to certain trends that are increasing demand in our industry, including demographic, medical and political developments.

        Demographic trends have a particular impact on our I/DD business. Increases in the life expectancy of I/DD individuals, we believe, have resulted in steady increases in the demand for I/DD services. In addition, caregivers currently caring for their relatives at home are aging and may soon be unable to continue with these responsibilities. Each of these factors affects the size of the I/DD population in need of services and, therefore, the amount of residential and non-residential I/DD programs offered by governments in our markets. Similarly, our ARY service line has been driven by favorable demographics. In addition, our ABI service line has been positively affected by increased life expectancy resulting from faster emergency response and improved medical techniques that have resulted in more people surviving an ABI.

        Political trends can also affect our operations. In particular, budgetary changes can influence the overall level of payments for our services, the number of clients and the preferred settings for many of the services we provide. Pressure from client advocacy groups for the populations we serve has generally helped our business, as these groups generally seek to pressure governments to fund residential services that use our small group home or host home models, rather than large, institutional models. In addition, our ARY service line has been positively affected by the trend toward privatization of services. Furthermore, we believe that successful lobbying by these groups has preserved I/DD and ARY services and, therefore, our revenue base, from significant cutbacks as compared with certain other human services. In addition, a number of states have developed community-based waiver programs to support long-term care services for survivors of ABI.

    Expansion

        We have grown our business through expansion of existing markets and programs as well as through acquisitions.

24


Table of Contents

    Organic Growth

        We believe that our future growth will depend heavily on our ability to expand existing service contracts and to win new contracts. Our organic expansion activities can consist of both new program starts in existing markets and geographical expansion in new markets. Our new program starts typically require us to fund operating losses for a period of approximately 18-24 months. If a new program start does not become profitable during such period, we may terminate it. During the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, losses on new program starts for programs started within the last 18 months that generated operating losses were $5.3 million.

    Acquisitions

        As of September 30, 2008, we have completed more than 25 acquisitions since 2003, including several acquisitions of rights to government contracts or fixed assets from small providers, which we refer to as "tuck-in" acquisitions. We have pursued larger strategic acquisitions in markets with significant opportunities.

        We also "cross-sell" new services in existing markets. Depending on the nature of the program and the state or local government involved, we will seek new programs through either unsolicited proposals to government agencies or by responding to a request, generally known as a request for proposal, from a public sector agency.

    Divestitures

        We regularly review and consider the divestiture of underperforming or non-strategic businesses to improve our operating results and better utilize our capital. We have made divestitures in the past and expect that we may make additional divestitures in the future. Divestitures could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

    Net revenues

        Revenues are reported net of allowances for unauthorized sales, expected sales adjustments by business units and changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Revenues are also reported net of any state provider taxes or gross receipts taxes levied on services we provide. For fiscal 2008, we derived approximately 94% of our net revenues from states, counties or regional entities (e.g., Departments of Mental Retardation). The payment terms and rates of these contracts vary widely by jurisdiction and service type, and may be based on per person per diems, rates established by the jurisdiction, cost-based reimbursement, hourly rates and/or units of service. We bill most of our residential services on a per diem basis, and we bill most of our non-residential services on an hourly basis. Some of our revenues are billed pursuant to cost-based reimbursement contracts, under which the billed rate is tied to the underlying costs. Lower than expected cost levels may require us to return previously received payments after cost reports are filed. In addition, our revenues may be affected by adjustments to our billed rates as well as write-offs of previously billed amounts. Revenues in the future may be affected by changes in rate-setting structures, methodologies or interpretations that may be proposed in states where we operate or by the federal government which provides matching funds. We cannot determine the impact of such changes or the effect of any possible governmental actions.

        Occasionally, timing of payment streams may be affected by delays by the state related to bill processing systems, staffing or other factors. While these delays have historically impacted our cash position in particular periods, they have not resulted in long-term collections problems.

25


Table of Contents

    Expenses

        Expenses directly related to providing services are classified as cost of revenues. Direct costs and expenses principally include salaries and benefits for service provider employees, per diem payments to our Mentors, residential occupancy expenses, which are primarily comprised of rent and utilities related to facilities providing direct care, certain client expenses such as food and medicine and transportation costs for clients requiring services. General and administrative expenses primarily include salaries and benefits for administrative employees, or employees that are not directly providing services, administrative occupancy and insurance costs, as well as professional expenses such as consulting, legal and accounting services. Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation for fixed assets utilized in both facilities providing direct care and administrative offices, and amortization related to intangible assets.

        Wages and benefits to our employees and per diem payments to our Mentors constitute the most significant operating cost in each of our operations. Most of our employee caregivers are paid on an hourly basis, with hours of work generally tied to client need. Our Mentors are paid on a per diem basis, but only if the Mentor is currently caring for a client. Our labor costs are generally influenced by levels of service and these costs can vary in material respects across regions.

        Occupancy costs represent a significant portion of our operating costs. As of September 30, 2008, we owned 405 facilities and two offices, and we leased 860 facilities and 282 offices. Many of our leased facilities, which are comprised primarily of group homes, are operated under leases with terms of less than two years. We incur no facility costs for services provided in the home of a Mentor.

        Expenses incurred in connection with liability insurance and third-party claims for professional and general liability totaled approximately 0.4%, 0.3% and 0.8% of our net revenues for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We have incurred professional and general liability claims and insurance expense for professional and general liability of $3.5 million, $2.8 million and $6.5 million for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In fiscal 2006, we purchased additional insurance for certain claims relating to pre-Merger periods. Excluding this, we incurred professional and general liability claims and insurance expense for professional and general liability of $3.9 million for fiscal 2006. We currently insure through our captive subsidiary professional and general liability claims for amounts of up to $1.0 million per claim and up to $2.0 million in the aggregate. Above these limits, we have limited additional third-party coverage. We also insure through our captive subsidiary employment practices liability claims of up to $240,000 per claim and up to $1.0 million in the aggregate.

        Our cost of net revenues as a percentage of revenues for our different services may vary, with our ABI services, generally, having the highest margin (or lowest costs as a percentage of revenues). Our ability to maintain our margin in the future is dependent upon obtaining increases in rates and/or controlling our expenses. In fiscal 2008, we invested in our infrastructure initiatives and business process improvements, which had a negative impact on our margin. If we choose to continue to invest in our infrastructure initiatives and business process improvements our margin will continue to be negatively impacted.

Fiscal 2008 Highlights

    Revenues for fiscal 2008 were $962.9 million, income from operations was $43.9 million and our net loss was $7.2 million.

    Total debt, including obligations under capital leases, decreased by approximately $2.4 million, from $516.3 million as of September 30, 2007 to $513.9 million as of September 30, 2008.

    In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we acquired Transitional Services, Inc. ("TSI") for approximately $9.0 million in cash. TSI provides residential services to individuals with I/DD in central and southern Indiana.

26


Table of Contents

    In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we drew $40.0 million of funds from the senior secured revolving credit facility. A portion of the funds were used for the earn-out payment related to the CareMeridian acquisition which was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes and potential acquisitions.

Results of Operations

        The following table sets forth the percentages of net revenues that certain items of operating data constitute for the periods indicated:

 
  Predecessor   Successor  
 
  Period From
October 1
Through June 29,
2006
  Period From
June 30 Through
September 30,
2006
  Fiscal Year
Ended
September 30,
2007
  Fiscal Year
Ended
September 30,
2008
 

Statement of operations data:

                         

Net revenues

    100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

Cost of revenues

    75.8     76.7     75.7     76.0  

General and administrative expenses

    13.5     14.2     13.5     14.0  

Transaction costs

    1.6     0.0     0.0     0.0  

Stock option settlement

    4.6     0.0     0.0     0.0  

Depreciation and amortization

    3.0     5.6     5.6     5.4  

Interest expense

    8.9     6.3     5.5     5.0  

Benefit for income taxes

    (2.0 )   (1.1 )   (0.1 )   0.0  

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007

Net revenues

        Net revenues for fiscal 2008 increased by $52.8 million, or 5.8%, from fiscal 2007 to $962.9 million. Approximately $3.8 million of the $52.8 million increase relates to acquisitions that closed during fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. Excluding the revenue growth from acquisitions noted above, revenues increased $49.0 million or 5.4% from fiscal 2007. Approximately $37.3 million of this increase was due to growth in our existing programs. The remaining increase of $11.7 million was due to revenues derived from new programs that began operations during fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008.

Cost of revenues

        Cost of revenues for fiscal 2008 increased by $43.4 million, or 6.3%, to $732.3 million. As a percentage of net revenues, cost of revenues increased from 75.7% for fiscal 2007 to 76.0% for fiscal 2008. Our cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues increased as a result of the ongoing effects of a change in reimbursement policy affecting our business in North Carolina beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. In addition, our increased investments in new program starts during the period significantly increased our cost of revenues.

General and administrative expenses

        General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008 increased by $12.1 million, or 9.9%, to $135.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, general and administrative expenses increased from 13.5% for fiscal 2007 to 14.0% for fiscal 2008. The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues is primarily due to an increase in investments in growth initiatives and business process improvements. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008 also included an additional $1.4 million of stock based compensation expense.

27


Table of Contents

Other expense, net

        Other expense, net for fiscal 2008 increased by approximately $0.5 million, or 110%, to $0.9 million. Other expense included the loss on disposal of property, equipment and real estate, as well as, the changes in the cash surrender value of the Company Owned Life Insurance ("COLI"). We purchased COLI policies on certain employees and the change in the cash surrender value was recorded in other expense. The increase in expense from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 was primarily due to a decrease in the contract value of the life insurance policies of $0.4 million.

Benefit for income taxes

        The benefit for income taxes of $0.2 million for fiscal 2008 resulted in an effective tax rate of 2.9% compared to an effective tax rate of 16.2% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in effective tax rate was primarily due to the increase in loss from continuing operations before income taxes.

Interest expense

        Interest expense for fiscal 2008 decreased $1.7 million, or 3.4%, to $48.4 million. As a percentage of net revenues, interest expense decreased from 5.5% for fiscal 2007 to 5.0% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in interest expense is due to a decrease in the average debt balance as well as a 0.3% decrease in the weighted average interest rate from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008.

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

        Loss from discontinued operations for fiscal 2008 included losses of $0.8 million, net of taxes, from the sale of Integrity and losses of $0.5 million, net of taxes, from the sale of our business operations in the state of Oklahoma.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2006

        The results for fiscal 2006 were derived by the mathematical addition of the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 and the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006. This presentation of financial information for fiscal 2006 may yield results that are not fully comparable on a period-to-period basis, particularly related to the depreciation and amortization, interest expense and tax provision accounts, primarily due to the impact of the Transactions. This presentation is consistent with the way management uses this information internally.

    Net revenues

        Net revenues for fiscal 2007 increased by $120.9 million, or 15.3% from the prior fiscal year, to $910.1 million. Approximately $70.3 million of the $120.9 million increase relates to acquisitions that closed during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007. Excluding the revenue growth from acquisitions noted above, revenues increased $50.6 million, or 6.4%, from the prior fiscal year. Approximately $38.3 million of this increase was due to growth in our existing programs. The remaining increase of $12.3 million was due to revenues derived from new programs that began operations during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007.

    Cost of revenues

        Cost of revenues for fiscal 2007 increased by $88.9 million, or 14.8%, to $688.9 million. As a percentage of net revenues, cost of revenues has decreased from 76.0% for fiscal 2006 to 75.7% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues is due mostly to a decrease in direct labor costs as a percentage of net revenues. Direct labor costs decreased 0.2% as a percentage of net revenues, from 55.8% for fiscal 2006 to 55.6% for fiscal 2007.

28


Table of Contents

    General and administrative expenses

        General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2007 increased by $14.6 million, or 13.5%, to $123.0 million. As a percentage of net revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased from 13.7% for fiscal 2006 to 13.5% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues is primarily due to a decrease in professional and general liability insurance, which decreased 0.5% as a percentage of net revenues, from 0.8% for fiscal 2006 to 0.3% for fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2006, the Company purchased additional insurance for certain claims relating to pre-Merger periods. In fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a pretax impairment charge of $1.1 million related to the write-down of agency contracts and the write-off of intellectual property.

    Depreciation and amortization

        Depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2007 increased by $21.5 million, or 73.5% from fiscal 2006, to $50.7 million. The increase in depreciation and amortization reflects the increase in the cost basis of the fixed assets and intangible assets related to the Transactions. The fixed assets and intangible assets were revalued as of the first day of the successor period, June 30, 2006, and the increased value is being depreciated and amortized over the useful lives of the assets.

    Interest expense

        Interest expense for fiscal 2007 decreased by $14.7 million, or 22.6% from fiscal 2006, to $50.2 million. Interest expense for fiscal 2007 reflects a full year of interest on the new credit facility and the new senior subordinated notes.

        Interest expense for fiscal 2006 was $64.8 million, including $22.5 million related to the tender premium and related expenses in connection with the tender offer for the 9 5 / 8 % senior subordinated notes due 2012 ("old notes"), as well as $8.0 million related to the acceleration of deferred financing costs related to the old credit facility and old notes.

    Benefit for income taxes

        The benefit for income taxes of $0.5 million for fiscal 2007 was due to a loss before benefit for income taxes of $3.0 million generated during this period. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was 16.2%.

        The benefit for income taxes of $2.2 million for the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 was due to a loss before benefit for income taxes of $5.9 million generated during this period. The effective tax rate for the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 was 37.8%.

        The benefit for income taxes of $11.3 million for the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was due to a loss before benefit for income taxes of $43.1 million generated during this period. The effective tax rate for the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was 26.3%. The effective tax rate for the period is lower than in previous years as certain expenses related to the Transactions were considered non-deductible for income tax purposes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Our principal uses of cash are to meet working capital requirements, to fund debt obligations and to finance capital expenditures and acquisitions. Cash flows from operations have historically been sufficient to meet these cash requirements.

        Cash flows provided by operating activities for fiscal 2008 were $53.6 million compared to $52.8 million for fiscal 2007 compared to $3.5 million for fiscal 2006. The slight increase from fiscal

29


Table of Contents


2007 to fiscal 2008 was primarily due to an improvement in our days sales outstanding from 48.7 at September 30, 2007 to 45.5 days at September 30, 2008. The increase from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007 was primarily due to Merger-related items that were included in our results for fiscal 2006, including the payment of the stock option settlement, the bond tender premium and transaction costs.

        Net cash used in investing activities, primarily consisting of cash paid for acquisitions and purchases of property and equipment, was $39.0 million for fiscal 2008 compared to $43.2 million for fiscal 2007 compared to $422.0 million for fiscal 2006.

        Cash paid for acquisitions for fiscal 2008 was $14.9 million, primarily reflecting the acquisition of TSI for approximately $9.0 million and the earn-out payment of $5.5 million associated with the CareMeridian acquisition. Cash paid for acquisitions in fiscal 2007 was $25.1 million, primarily reflecting the purchase price of six acquisitions during fiscal 2007. Cash paid for acquisitions for fiscal 2006 was $35.8 million reflecting the purchase price for eight acquisitions paid for during fiscal 2006. In addition, cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2006 included $371.2 million paid for acquisition of the predecessor company.

        Investing activities also included the purchase of property and equipment. Cash paid for property and equipment was $26.1 million, or 2.7% of net revenues, for fiscal 2008, compared to $19.7 million, or 2.2% of net revenues, for fiscal 2007 compared to $15.8, or 2.0% of net revenues, for fiscal 2006. Approximately $2.8 million of cash paid for property and equipment for fiscal 2008 was related to the implementation of a new billing system.

        Net cash used in financing activities was $5.0 million for fiscal 2008 compared to $6.7 million for fiscal 2007. Our financing activities primarily included the repayment of long term debt of $4.0 million in fiscal 2008 and $4.5 million in fiscal 2007. In addition to our scheduled term B payments, in fiscal 2007 we paid $750 thousand to repurchase the remaining 9 5 / 8 % senior subordinated notes due 2012.

        Net cash provided by financing activities was $420.3 million for fiscal 2006. Our financing activities in fiscal 2006 primarily consisted of merger related items including, proceeds from the issuance of long term debt, parent capital contribution and repayment of long-term debt from the predecessor company.

        On October 14, 2008, we drew $40.0 million of funds from the senior secured revolving credit facility. A portion of the funds were used for the earn-out payment related to the CareMeridian acquisition which was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes and potential acquisitions. Pending these uses, the funds have been invested in a money market fund that invests only in short-term US Treasury securities. After taking into account this drawdown, which occurred on October 14, 2008, we have an available capacity of approximately $82.0 million remaining under the revolving credit facility.

        Borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility bear interest at the prime rate plus a margin of 1.25%. The all-in rate of interest on this $40.0 million revolving loan is 5.75%. Payments of the principal amounts of borrowings under the revolving credit facility are due no later than June 29, 2012.

30


Table of Contents

Contractual Commitments Summary

        The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2008:

(in thousands)
  Total   Less than
1 year
  1-3 years   3-5 years   More than
5 years
 

Long-term debt obligations(1)

  $ 511,913     3,735     10,765     317,413     180,000  

Operating lease obligations(2)

    119,943     31,366     45,135     25,063     18,379  

Capital lease obligations

    2,007     201     187     128     1,491  

Standby letters of credit

    23,018     23,018              
                       

Total obligations and commitments(3)

  $ 656,881     58,320     56,087     342,604     199,870  
                       

(1)
Does not include interest on long-term debt or the $198.5 million of senior floating rate toggle notes due 2014, net of discount, issued by NMH Holdings.

(2)
Includes the fixed rent payable under the leases and does not include additional amounts, such as taxes, that may be payable under the leases.

(3)
The table does not include earnout payments associated with the CareMeridian acquisition. We made earn-out payments of approximately $5.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and $12.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

Inflation

        We do not believe that general inflation in the U.S. economy has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

        We have no significant off-balance sheet transactions or interests.

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Since future events and the impact of those events cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. These differences could be material to the financial statements.

        We believe our application of accounting policies, and the estimates inherently required therein, are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.

        The following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.

    Revenue Recognition

        Revenues are reported net of any state provider taxes or gross receipts taxes levied on services we provide. Revenues are also reported net of allowances for unauthorized sales and estimated sales adjustments by business units. Sales adjustments are estimated based on an analysis of historical sales adjustments and recent developments in the payment trends in each business unit. We follow Staff

31


Table of Contents

Accounting Bulletin 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), which requires that revenue can only be recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable.

        We recognize revenues for services performed pursuant to contracts with various state and local government agencies and private health care agencies as follows: cost-reimbursement contract revenues are recognized at the time the service costs are incurred and units-of-service contract revenues are recognized at the time the service is provided. For our cost-reimbursement contracts, the rate provided by the payor is based on a certain level of service and types of costs incurred in delivering the service. From time to time, we receive payments under cost-reimbursement contracts in excess of the allowable costs required to support those payments. In such instances, we estimate and record a liability for such excess payments. At the end of the contract period, any balance of excess payments is maintained as a liability until it is reimbursed to the payor. Revenues in the future may be affected by changes in rate-setting structures, methodologies or interpretations that may be enacted in states where we operate or by the federal government.

    Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from government agencies, not-for-profit providers and commercial insurance companies. An estimated allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected. In evaluating the collectibility of accounts receivable, we consider a number of factors, including payment trends in individual states, age of the accounts and the status of ongoing disputes with third party payors. Complex rules and regulations regarding billing and timely filing requirements in various states are also a factor in our assessment of the collectibility of accounts receivable. Actual collections of accounts receivable in subsequent periods may require changes in the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. Changes in these estimates are charged or credited to revenue in the statement of operations in the period of the change in estimate.

    Accruals for Self-Insurance

        We maintain professional and general liability, workers' compensation, automobile liability and health insurance with policies that include self-insured retentions. We record expenses related to claims on an incurred basis, which includes estimates of fully developed losses for both reported and unreported claims. The accruals for the health and workers compensation, automobile and professional and general liability programs are based on actuarially determined estimates. Accruals relating to prior periods are periodically reevaluated and increased or decreased based on new information. As such, these changes in estimates are recorded as charges or credits to the statement of operations in a period subsequent to the change in estimate.

    Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), we review costs of purchased businesses in excess of net assets acquired (goodwill), and indefinite-life intangible assets for impairment at least annually, unless significant changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment may have occurred sooner.

        We are required to test goodwill on a reporting unit basis. We use a fair value approach to test goodwill for impairment and recognize an impairment charge for the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds fair value. The impairment test for indefinite-life intangible assets requires the determination of the fair value of the intangible asset. If the fair value of the intangible asset were less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the difference. Fair values are established using discounted cash flow and comparative market multiple

32


Table of Contents


methods. We conduct our annual impairment test on July 1 of each year, and as of the date of the last test, there was no impairment and there have been no indicators of impairment since the date of the test.

        Discounted cash flows are based on management's estimates of our future performance. As such, actual results may differ from these estimates and lead to a revaluation of our goodwill and intangible assets. If updated calculations indicate that the fair value of goodwill or any indefinite-life intangibles is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge would be recorded in the statement of operations in the period of the change in estimate.

        Pursuant to SFAS 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values.

    Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144), we review long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based on the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded based upon various techniques to estimate fair value.

    Income Taxes

        We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). Under SFAS 109, the asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined by multiplying the differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting bases for assets and liabilities by the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such differences are recovered or settled. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are separated into current and long-term amounts based on the classification of the related assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets are estimated based on our assessment of the realizability of such amounts.

        On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the criteria that a tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

    Stock-Based Compensation

        The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123(R)), to account for share-based payments to employees. NMH Investment adopted an equity-based plan, and issued units of limited liability company interests pursuant to such plan. The units are limited liability company interests and are available for issuance to our employees and members of the Board of Directors for incentive purposes. For purposes of determining the compensation expense associated with these grants, management valued the business enterprise using a variety of widely accepted valuation techniques which considered a number of factors such as our financial performance, the values of comparable companies and the lack of marketability of our equity. We then used the option pricing method to determine the fair value of these units at the time of grant using valuation assumptions consisting of the expected term in which the units will be realized; a risk-free interest rate equal to the U.S. federal treasury bond rate consistent with the term assumption;

33


Table of Contents

expected dividend yield, for which there is none; and expected volatility based on the historical data of equity instruments of comparable companies. The Class B and Class E units vest over a five-year service period. The Class C and Class D units vest based on certain performance and/or investment return conditions being met or achieved. The estimated fair value of the units, less an assumed forfeiture rate, is being recognized in expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service/performance periods of the awards.

    Derivative Financial Instruments

        We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), which requires that all derivative instruments be reported on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current operations or in shareholders' equity as other comprehensive income (loss) depending upon whether the derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction.

        We, from time to time, enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against variability in cash flows resulting from fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate, which is LIBOR, on our debt. These agreements involve the exchange of variable interest rates for fixed interest rates over the life of the swap agreement without an exchange of the notional amount upon which the payments are based. On a quarterly basis, the differential to be received or paid as interest rates change is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. In addition, on a quarterly basis the mark to market valuation is recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss) as a change to shareholders' equity, net of tax. The related amount receivable from or payable to counterparties is included as an asset or liability in our consolidated balance sheet.

    Legal Contingencies

        From time to time, we are involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings in the operation of our business. We reserve for costs related to contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. While we believe our provision for legal contingencies is adequate, the outcome of our legal proceedings is difficult to predict and we may settle legal claims or be subject to judgments for amounts that differ from our estimates. In addition, legal contingencies could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations in any given future reporting period. See the "Risk Factors" section of this report.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

        We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our outstanding variable rate debt. To reduce our interest rate exposure, we entered into interest rate swap agreements whereby we fixed the interest rate on approximately $221.2 million of our $335.0 million term B loan, effective as of August 31, 2006 and fixed the interest rate on approximately $113.3 million of our remaining $335.0 million term B loan, effective as of August 31, 2007. In total, as of September 30, 2008, we fixed the interest rate on approximately $321.8 million of our $327.5 term B loan.

34


Table of Contents

        The table below provides information about our interest rate swap agreements and remaining variable rate debt related to the term B loan.

 
  Agreement   30-Sep-08   30-Sep-09   30-Sep-10  
(in thousands)
Interest Swap effective date
  Swap
Value
  Rate   Swap
Value
  Rate   Swap
Value
  Rate   Swap
Value
  Rate  

August 31, 2006(1)

  $ 221,200     5.32 % $ 137,844     5.32 % $ 88,988     5.32 %        

August 31, 2007(1)

    113,297     4.89 %   183,930     4.89 %   220,117     4.89 %        

Variable rate debt

                5,689         15,008         320,763      
                                       

Total term B loan

              $ 327,463       $ 324,113       $ 320,763      
                                       

(1)
Interest rates do not include 2.00% spread on LIBOR loans.

        As a result of the interest rate swap agreements, the variable rate debt outstanding was reduced from $331.9 million outstanding to $10.1 million outstanding at September 30, 2008. The variable rate debt outstanding was reduced from $335.9 million outstanding to $9.2 million outstanding at September 30, 2007. The variable rate debt outstanding relates to the term loan, which has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus 2.00% or Prime plus 1.00%, the revolver, which has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus 2.25% or Prime plus 1.25%, subject to reduction depending on our leverage ratio, and the term loan mortgage, which has an interest rate based on Prime plus 1.50%. An increase in the interest rate by 100 basis points on the debt balance outstanding as of September 30, 2008, would increase annual interest expense by approximately $0.1 million.

        As of September 30, 2008, we had no borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility. On October 14, 2008, we drew $40.0 million of funds from the senior secured revolving credit facility. A portion of the funds were used for the earn-out payment related to the CareMeridian acquisition which was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes and potential acquisitions. Pending these uses, the funds have been invested in a money market fund that invests only in short-term US Treasury securities.

        Borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility bear interest at the prime rate plus a margin of 1.25%. The all-in rate of interest on this $40.0 million revolving loan is 5.75%. Payments of the principal amounts of borrowings under the revolving credit facility are due no later than June 29, 2012. After taking into account this drawdown, which occurred on October 14, 2008, we have an available capacity of approximately $82.0 million remaining under the revolving credit facility.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        Our consolidated financial statements required by this Item are on pages F-1 through F-34 of this report.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        Not applicable.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

        Not applicable.

Item 9A(T).    Controls and Procedures

(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and

35


Table of Contents

reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. As of September 30, 2008, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2008, in light of the material weaknesses described below.

(b)
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") as of September 30, 2008. Based on this evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, identified the material weaknesses described below and, therefore, concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. We have reported these material weaknesses to our Audit Committee and our independent registered public accounting firm.

        A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. To our knowledge, these material weaknesses have not resulted in any material misstatement of our financial statements.

        Our material weaknesses relate to our revenue recognition and our fixed asset balances, as detailed below.

Revenue

    We have insufficient controls over revenue recognition. We maintain a revenue recognition policy in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, we lack controls to ensure definitive, consistent and documented application of the revenue recognition criteria with respect to local payor contract requirements, which vary among payors and locations.

    We have insufficient controls over revenue recognition for unauthorized sales. Generally, if we provide services without a current, valid authorization from the payor agency to provide those services, revenue associated with the unauthorized services may need to be deferred until such authorization is received. If authorization is ultimately not granted, revenues will not be recognized. We do not have adequate controls to ensure that all unauthorized sales are identified and recorded appropriately in the consolidated financial statements.

        We are currently developing an approach to assess contract terms in each state to ensure that our revenue recognition policy is being consistently and appropriately interpreted and applied. We are also

36


Table of Contents


beginning to implement a new system and processes that are expected to ultimately improve our ability to identify and reserve for unauthorized sales.

Fixed Assets

    We have insufficient controls to verify the existence of our fixed asset balances reflected on our consolidated balance sheets. This increases the risk of overstating our fixed asset balances if we fail to record disposals of fixed assets as they occur.

        We are continuing to implement processes to maintain and evaluate our fixed asset balances, which as designed, should provide adequate controls.

        The following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were first disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007. Based on our remediation efforts described below, as of the date of this report, these material weaknesses now meet the definition of significant deficiencies. To our knowledge, these significant deficiencies have not resulted in any material misstatement of our financial statements and have been reported to our Audit Committee and independent registered public accounting firm.

        A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting.

    We previously disclosed insufficient controls over the accuracy and validity of the billing rates used to calculate revenues recorded in our consolidated financial statements. We addressed this by developing a system report to capture all changes made to billing rates in order to facilitate a periodic review to ensure, at a high level, that any rate changes are appropriate and reasonable.

    We previously disclosed insufficient controls over the reconciliation of revenue recorded in our consolidated financial statements to revenue billed to the payor. We addressed this by implementing a reconciliation process to identify and appropriately justify or resolve any variances between revenue recorded in the consolidated financial statements and actual invoices rendered to the payor.

        The following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting was first disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007. Based on our remediation efforts described below, as of the date of this report, this material weakness now meets the definition of a deficiency.

        A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.

    We previously disclosed insufficient segregation of duties within our payroll function, as well as the operating failure of certain mitigating controls. We addressed this by redesigning and reassigning responsibilities within the payroll system and processing function in order to segregate certain incompatible tasks as well as strengthening mitigating controls through additional training and supervision.

(c)
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

        In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we introduced a new billing and accounts receivable system in certain states. The implementation of this billing and accounts receivable system will affect the processes that impact our internal control over financial reporting. As we continue with the system implementation, we will review the related controls and may take further steps to ensure that they are effective and integrated appropriately.

37


Table of Contents

        Except for the changes implemented to remediate the material weaknesses noted above, during the most recent fiscal year, there were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

        This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.

Item 9B.    Other Information.

        Not applicable.

38


Table of Contents


PART III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

        The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our directors and executive officers as of December 1, 2008:

Name
  Age   Position

Gregory T. Torres

    59  

Chairman

Edward M. Murphy

    61  

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Juliette E. Fay

    56  

Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer

Denis M. Holler

    54  

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Hugh R. Jones, III

    43  

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Assistant Secretary

Bruce F. Nardella

    51  

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Linda DeRenzo

    49  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Kathleen P. Federico

    49  

Senior Vice President, Human Resources

John J. Green

    49  

Senior Vice President of Finance Operations and Assistant Treasurer

Robert A. Longo

    46  

Senior Vice President and Cambridge Operating Group President

David M. Petersen

    60  

Senior Vice President and Redwood Operating Group President

James L. Elrod, Jr. 

    54  

Director

Pamela F. Lenehan

    56  

Director

Kevin A. Mundt

    54  

Director

Daniel S. O'Connell

    54  

Director

        Directors are elected at the annual meeting of our sole stockholder and hold office until the next annual meeting or a special meeting in lieu thereof, and until their successors are elected and qualified, or upon their earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships between any of the directors and executive officers listed in the table. There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an officer.

         Gregory T. Torres has served as Chairman of the board of directors since September 2004. He was also the Company's Chief Executive Officer from January 1996 to January 2005, as well as its President from January 1996 until September 2004. Mr. Torres joined MENTOR in 1980 as a member of its first board of directors. In 1992, Mr. Torres became senior vice president for business development, strategic planning and public affairs. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Torres held prominent positions within the public sector, including chief of staff of the Massachusetts Senate Committee on Ways and Means and assistant secretary of human services. Mr. Torres began his career as a direct care worker in the juvenile justice field. In May 2007, Mr. Torres was named president and chief executive officer of the Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth ("MassINC"), an independent, nonpartisan research and educational institute in Boston.

         Edward M. Murphy has served as our President since September 2004 and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2005. Mr. Murphy founded Alliance Health and Human Services in 1999 and served as the organization's President and CEO until September 2004. Prior to founding Alliance, he was a Senior Vice President at Tucker Anthony and President and Chief Operating Officer of Olympus Healthcare Group. Mr. Murphy is a former Commissioner of the Massachusetts

39


Table of Contents


Department of Youth Services and the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, and the former Executive Director of the Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority.

         Juliette E. Fay has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer since January 2006, managing national business development and the mergers and acquisitions group. Ms. Fay served as the Senior Vice President of National Business Development and Marketing from January 2002 to January 2006. Before joining MENTOR in 1998, Ms. Fay was the President and CEO of Charles River Health Management, a provider-based managed care company; the director of marketing and business development at the Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority; chief of staff for the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health; and the assistant commissioner for facility operations at the Massachusetts Department of Youth Services.

         Denis M. Holler was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in May 2007. Mr. Holler was named Senior Vice President of Finance in January 2002 and led the Company's corporate finance functions through the 2006 purchase by Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P. In addition to overseeing all finance functions of the Company, he manages external relationships with our equity sponsor, banking partners and high-yield investors. Prior to joining MENTOR in October 2000 as Vice President of Financial Operations, Mr. Holler was Chief Financial Officer of the Fortress Corporation.

         Hugh R. (Tripp) Jones, III was named Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer effective August 1, 2008. Prior to that he served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer beginning in May 2004, and served as Senior Vice President of Public Strategy from February 2003 to May 2004. In his current role, Mr. Jones coordinates corporate and operating group functions with responsibility for human resources, information technology, legal and public strategy. Before joining MENTOR, he co-founded in 1995 and led MassINC. Mr. Jones is a former staff director of the Massachusetts Legislature's Education Committee and chaired Governor Mitt Romney's education transition team in 2002.

         Bruce F. Nardella was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2007. Mr. Nardella joined MENTOR in 1996 as a state director and in May 2003 he was named President of our Eastern Division. Prior to that, he was a deputy commissioner for the Massachusetts Department of Youth Services. Mr. Nardella began his career working at a shelter facility for court-involved boys.

         Linda DeRenzo has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since March 2006. Ms. DeRenzo serves as our chief legal officer and oversees the risk management and regulatory compliance functions. An 18-year business law veteran before joining the Company, Ms. DeRenzo represented high-growth companies and their financiers in a variety of industries including information technology, life sciences and health services. Prior to joining MENTOR, Ms. DeRenzo was a partner at Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP in Boston from 1992 to 2004.

         Kathleen P. Federico joined the Company on December 1, 2008, as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources. From 2005 until joining MENTOR, Ms. Federico had served as Senior Vice President, Sales and Human Resources, for World Travel Holdings in Woburn, Massachusetts, and was its Senior Vice President, Human Resources, from 2002 to 2005. Prior to that, she served as Vice President of Human Resources for KaBloom LLC, NE Restaurant Company and Sodexho Marriott Services. Ms. Federico was also Chief Operating Officer for Sheehan Associates, an employee benefits brokerage firm.

         John J. Green served as our Senior Vice President of Field Finance from the May 2003 acquisition of REM until being named Senior Vice President of Finance Operations in June 2007. In this role, Mr. Green oversees field finance operations across our operations, and manages the procurement services, payroll services, real estate and leasing management services, reimbursement field financial

40


Table of Contents


reporting and analysis. Mr. Green was previously Controller of REM, having joined REM in April 1986 as Assistant Controller. He is a certified public accountant with 27 years of experience both in public accounting and the healthcare industry.

         Robert A. Longo served as our Senior Vice President and President of our Western Division from May 2003 until being named Operating Group President in June 2007. Mr. Longo joined MENTOR in 1993, and has previously held the positions of children's services program manager, state director and vice president, all managing various operations. Mr. Longo has served on the boards of numerous organizations focused on mental health and human services, including serving for three years on the board of the national Foster Family-Based Treatment Association.

         David M. Petersen served as our Senior Vice President and President of our Central Division from May 2003 until being named Senior Vice President and Operating Group President in June 2007. Prior to joining MENTOR, Mr. Petersen worked for REM since 1972, having managed various operations in Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota and Wisconsin.

         James L. Elrod, Jr. joined our board of directors in June 2006. Mr. Elrod is a Managing Director of Vestar Capital Partners, having joined Vestar in 1998. Previously, he was Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations for Physicians Health Service, a public managed care company. Prior to that, he was a Managing Director and Partner of Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. Mr. Elrod is currently a director of Essent Healthcare, Inc., Joerns Healthcare, LLC and Radiation Therapy Services, Inc.

         Pamela F. Lenehan was elected to our board of directors on December 1, 2008. Ms. Lenehan has served as President of Ridge Hill Consulting, a strategy and financial consulting firm, since 2002. Prior to this, Ms. Lenehan was self-employed as a private investor. From 2000 to 2001, she was vice president and chief financial officer of Convergent Networks. From 1995 to 2000, she was senior vice president of corporate development and treasurer of Oak Industries Inc. Prior to that, Ms. Lenehan was a Managing Director in Credit Suisse First Boston's Investment Banking division and a vice president of Corporate Banking at Chase Manhattan Bank. Ms. Lenehan is currently a member of the boards of directors of Spartech Corporation and Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.

         Kevin A. Mundt joined our board of directors in March 2008. He is a Managing Director at Vestar, and is President of the Vestar Resources group. Before joining Vestar in 2004, Mr. Mundt spent 23 years as a strategy and operations consultant specializing in consumer products, retailing and multi-point distribution, as well as healthcare and industrial marketing. For 11 of those years, Mr. Mundt was a strategic adviser to Vestar, and served on the boards of several Vestar portfolio companies. He began his consulting career at Bain and Company, and went on from there to co-found Corporate Decisions, Inc. When that firm was acquired by Marsh and McLennan, Mr. Mundt became a Managing Director of Marsh and McLennan's financial consulting arm, Mercer Oliver Wyman.

         Daniel S. O'Connell joined our Board of Directors in June 2006. Mr. O'Connell is the Chief Executive Officer and founder of Vestar Capital Partners. Mr. O'Connell is currently a director of Birds Eye Foods, Inc., Radiation Therapy Services, Inc., Sunrise Medical, Inc., St. John Knits International, Inc., Solo Cup Company, The Sun Products Corp., companies in which Vestar or its affiliates have a significant equity interest. In addition, he is a Trustee Emeritus of Brown University.

Code of Ethics

        We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer. The MENTOR Network Code of Conduct is publicly available on our website at www.thementornetwork.com, via a link from our "Compliance" page under the tab, "Network of Quality". If we make any substantive amendments to the Code, or grant any waiver from a provision of the Code to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a report on Form 8-K.

41


Table of Contents

Audit Committee Financial Expert

        As a debt-only issuer, we are not subject to listing standards requiring that we maintain an audit committee. Because we are not required to have an audit committee, we have not previously designated an audit committee financial expert. Ms. Lenehan was appointed to our audit committee on December 5, 2008, and the Board of Directors determined that she will be an audit committee financial expert beginning with the Company's SEC filings for the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

         General Overview.     The Company is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NMH Investment. NMH Investment is beneficially owned by Vestar and certain affiliates, certain of our directors and members of our management team. Daniel O'Connell, James Elrod, Jr. and Kevin Mundt, each an employee of Vestar, are directors of the Company. Brian K. Ratzan, an employee of Vestar, was a director and a member of our Audit and Capital Allocation Committees until his resignation from our Board in March 2008. Jeffry A. Timmons was a director and a member of our Audit and Compensation Committees at the time of his death in April 2008. The Company's Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Elrod.

        In connection with the Merger on June 29, 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with its president and chief executive officer, Edward Murphy. It also entered into severance agreements with its other executive officers, including Denis Holler, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Bruce Nardella, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Juliette Fay, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer, and David Petersen, the Company's Senior Vice President and Redwood Operating Group President. The compensation paid to the executive officers reflects negotiations at the time of the Merger, with adjustments for Messrs. Holler, Nardella and Petersen after their promotions during fiscal 2007. In addition, as part of the Merger, management invested approximately $11.6 million in Preferred Units and Class A Units in NMH Investment.

        Following the Merger, in January 2007, certain members of the Company's management, including the executive officers, were awarded grants of Class B, Class C and Class D Units in NMH Investment. Messrs. Holler and Nardella were awarded additional grants of Class B, Class C and Class D Units following their promotions in fiscal 2007. The Company's executive officers were awarded additional grants of Class B, Class C and Class D Units in August 2008. Throughout this analysis, Messrs. Murphy, Holler, Nardella and Petersen and Ms. Fay are referred to as the "named executive officers".

         Compensation Policies and Practices.     The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

    attract and retain the best possible executive talent;

    achieve accountability for performance by linking annual cash and long-term equity incentive awards to achievement of measurable performance objectives; and

    align executives' incentives with equity value creation.

        Our executive compensation programs are designed to encourage our executive officers to operate the business in a manner that enhances equity value. The primary objective of our compensation program is to align the interests of our executive officers with our equityholders' short- and long-term interests. This is accomplished by awarding a substantial portion of our executives' overall compensation based on our financial performance, specifically growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA (with certain adjustments). We also have provided a

42


Table of Contents


significant portion of our executive officers' compensation through equity-based awards. Our compensation philosophy provides for a direct relationship between compensation and the achievement of our goals and seeks to include management in upside rewards.

        We seek to achieve an overall compensation program that provides foundational elements such as base salary and benefits that are generally competitive with our industry, as well as an opportunity for variable incentive compensation that comprises a substantial portion of an executive officer's annual compensation in order to drive the Company's achievement of performance goals.

        The Company's executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Company's Board of Directors. The role of the Committee is, among other things, to review and approve salaries and other compensation of the executive officers of the Company, to review and recommend equity grants under NMH Investment's equity plan, and to administer the annual cash incentive plan for all employees, including the executive officers.

         Elements of Compensation.     Each element of the executive compensation program works to fulfill one or more of the objectives of the program. The elements of our compensation program are as follows:

    base salary;

    annual cash bonus incentives;

    long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity-based units;

    deferred compensation;

    severance and change-in-control benefits; and

    other benefits.

        Our base salary structure is designed to recognize the contributions of our senior management team. Our annual bonuses are designed to reward executive officers for achievement of annual objectives tied to growth in EBITDA (with certain adjustments). Our equity component of compensation, in the form of equity units in NMH Investment, is designed to reward equity value creation. During fiscal 2008, at the direction of the Committee and consistent with its philosophy to provide competitive total compensation, the Company engaged an outside consultant to perform a market analysis of the total compensation paid to our executive officers compared to executive officers in comparable organizations. This study is still in progress and is expected to be completed and reviewed by the Committee during fiscal 2009. Set forth below is a description of each element, including why we have chosen to pay the element, how we determine the amount to be paid and how each compensation element and our decisions regarding how the element fits into our overall compensation objectives.

         Base Salary.     Base salary provides executives with a fixed amount of compensation paid on a regular basis throughout the year. The Compensation Committee's charter charges the Compensation Committee with reviewing and determining each executive's base salary on an annual basis. The named executive officers' base salaries were reviewed in connection with the closing of the Merger. In connection with the promotions of Messrs. Holler, Nardella and Petersen in fiscal 2007, Mr. Holler's salary increased from $220,000 to $275,000, Mr. Nardella's salary increased from $225,000 to $275,000, and Mr. Petersen's salary increased from $250,000 to $260,000, to reflect their increased duties. The promotions and increases were reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. Factors considered in increasing these base salaries included the new level and scope of responsibilities and a comparison with the base pay of the Company's other executive officers. The named executive officers' base salaries were reviewed again in September 2008 as required by the Committee's charter, and they were left unchanged.

43


Table of Contents

         Annual Incentive Compensation.     In addition to base salary, each named executive officer participates in an annual cash incentive plan, which constitutes the variable, performance-based component of an executive's cash compensation. The objective of this element of executive compensation is to drive individual performance and the achievement of organizational goals. The plan provides the executive officers with the opportunity to earn significant annual cash bonuses. The annual incentive plan for fiscal 2008 was structured to provide incentive compensation based upon the Company's attainment of certain financial targets for the applicable fiscal year, which were approved by the Compensation Committee, and individual performance on quality. The incentive compensation payout opportunity for Messrs. Holler, Nardella and Petersen and Ms. Fay is 25 percent of base salary at the threshold performance level, 50 percent at target level and 75 percent at the maximum level. Mr. Murphy's amended and restated employment agreement entitles him to 50 percent, 100 percent, and 150 percent at the threshold, target and maximum levels, respectively.

        The achievement of the payout targets is challenging. For the named executive officers to receive any payout, the Company must achieve a minimum threshold of 92.5% of its adjusted EBITDA and revenue goals. For the named executive officers to receive their maximum payout, the Company must achieve at least 107.5% of its adjusted EBITDA and revenue goals. Payouts for performance levels between threshold and maximum are calculated based upon pro-ration/interpolation. Under the terms of the plan, the incentive compensation is calculated by first determining potential incentive compensation based on the achievement of the goals for EBITDA (weighted 75%) and revenue (weighted 25%). This initial amount can be reduced by 10% for failure to achieve the free cash flow goal, and by up to 100% for the failure to meet individual quality goals. It can also be increased from a discretionary pool, if any, that arises when there are reductions under the Plan for failure to meet goals. In November 2007, the Committee approved the following financial targets for fiscal 2008: adjusted EBITDA of approximately $115 million, revenue of approximately $997 million and free cash flows of $24.5 million. The Committee chose these targets as profitability continues to be a major objective of the Company, while the focus on revenue is meant to incentivize management to expand the Company's overall business and not just its EBITDA. Free cash flows are essential to repay debt and fund the Company's growth and investment in infrastructure, and quality is central to our mission and vital to ensure that profitability is achieved only through delivery of safe and effective services.

        This year, the Company fell short of meeting its financial goals, achieving only 93% of the adjusted EBITDA goal and 96.4% of the revenue goal. The Company achieved its goal for free cash flows. As a result, the named executive officers were eligible to receive 58.8% of the payout that was achievable had the targets been met.

         Equity-Based Compensation.     Long-term incentive compensation is provided in the form of non-voting equity units in the Company's indirect parent company, NMH Investment, pursuant to the NMH Investment 2006 Unit Plan. The plan allows certain officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company to participate in the long-term growth and financial success of the Company through acquisition of equity interests in NMH Investment, including Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E Common Units of NMH Investment. The purpose of the plan is to promote the Company's long-term growth and profitability by aligning the interests of the Company's management with the interests of the ultimate parent of the Company and by encouraging retention. A pool of units was set aside for all employees, including the named executive officers, as part of the Merger and granted during the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Messrs. Holler and Nardella received grants of B, C and D units during fiscal 2007 in recognition of their promotions. The Company granted additional B, C and D units to the executive officers, including the named executive officers, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

        The B units time vest over 61 months. Assuming continued employment of the employee with the Company, 40 percent vest at the end of 37 months from the measurement date, and the remaining 60 percent vest monthly through the end of 61 months from the measurement date. Assuming

44


Table of Contents


continued employment, the C and D units time vest after three years, although the value of the C and D units depends on the achievement of certain performance-based conditions that relate to the Company's achievement of certain financial targets for fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, or the achievement of certain investment return conditions that relate to Vestar receiving a specified multiple of its investment in the event of a sale of the Company. The Company achieved the financial targets relating to the C units for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. As a result, as of the end of fiscal 2008, two-thirds of the total potential value of the C units had been earned. The Company achieved the financial targets relating to the D units for fiscal 2007, but did not achieve the financial targets relating the D units for fiscal 2008. As a result, as of the end of fiscal 2008, one-third of the total potential value of the D units had been earned. If the investment return condition relating to the C units is met upon a sale of the Company, holders of C units would receive 100% of the total potential value of the C units, and if certain investment return conditions relating to the D units are met upon a sale of the Company, holders of D units would receive 50% (if greater than the percentage otherwise earned based on performance-based conditions) or 100% of the total potential value of the D units, depending on which threshold of investment return is achieved. In all cases, vesting depends upon continued employment. If an executive's employment is terminated, NMH Investment may repurchase the executive's units. The units will be purchased for the initial purchase price, or "cost", fair market value or a combination of the two, depending on the circumstances of departure and based on the relevant measurement date, as set out in the table below. The relevant measurement date for all units held by the named executive officers is June 29, 2006, the date of the Merger, except for the units issued upon Mr. Holler's and Mr. Nardella's promotions, for which the relevant measurement date is May 22, 2007.

 
  B units   B units   C and D units   C and D units   All units
Circumstances of departure   Termination without cause, or resignation for good reason   Resignation without good reason   Termination without cause, or resignation for good reason   Resignation without good reason   Termination for cause
1-12 months after relevant measurement date   Cost   Cost   Fair market value   Cost   Cost
13-36 months after relevant measurement date   Portion at fair market value increases ratably each month, from 20.00% to 59.10%   Cost   Fair market value   Cost   Cost
37-60 months after relevant measurement date   Portion at fair market value increases ratably each month, from 60.80% to 99.90%   Portion at fair market value increases ratably each month, from 40.00% to 99.94%   Fair market value   Fair market value   Cost
61 months or later after relevant measurement date   Fair market value   Fair market value   Fair market value   Fair market value   Cost

        The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee which recommends awards to the management committee of NMH Investment. The management committee determines, among other things, specific participants in the plan as well as the amount and value of any units awarded. In recommending the equity grants for the executive officers, the Compensation Committee considered and adopted the recommendations of Mr. Murphy regarding allocations to the executive officers. Mr. Murphy's recommendations were based on each executive officer's position and level of responsibility relative to the other executive officers.

45


Table of Contents

         Deferred Compensation.     Under the National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, the named executive officers receive an allocation to their account based on a percentage of base salary, as follows: Mr. Murphy, 13%; Messrs. Holler and Nardella and Ms. Fay, 11%; and Mr. Petersen, 9%. This allocation is made as of the end of the plan year, December 31, for service rendered during the prior fiscal year. The balances accrue interest at a rate set prior to the beginning of the plan year. The interest rate for plan years 2007 and 2008 was 6%. The plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement, which provides deferred compensation to senior management. We may make discretionary contributions to the plan, although we did not do so in fiscal 2008. A participant's account balance is 100% vested and non-forfeitable and will be distributed to a participant following his or her retirement or termination from the Company, disability, death or at the Company's direction under certain circumstances.

        A 401(k) plan is available to eligible employees, including the named executive officers. Under the plan, we may make an annual discretionary matching contribution and/or profit-sharing contribution. To supplement the 401(k) plan, the National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferral Plan is available to highly compensated employees (as defined by Section 414(q) of the Internal Revenue Code), including the named executive officers. Participants may contribute up to 100 percent of salary and/or bonus earned during the plan year. This plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement and is coordinated with our 401(k) plan so as to maximize a participant's contributions and the Company's matching contributions to the 401(k) plan, with the residual remaining in the Executive Deferral Plan. Distributions are made upon a participant's termination of employment, disability, death, retirement or at a time specified by the participant when he or she makes a deferral election. Participants can elect to have distributions made in a lump sum or in monthly installments over a five-year period. A specific-date election may be made only in a lump sum. We have established a grantor trust to accumulate assets to provide for the obligations under the plan. Any assets of the grantor trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors.

         Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits.     As part of the Merger, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Murphy and entered into severance agreements with each of the other named executive officers. Each of these agreements provides for severance benefits to be paid to the named executive officer if the Company terminates his or her employment without "cause" or he or she resigns for "good reason", each as defined in the applicable agreement. See "—Severance Agreements".

        If any of the named executive officers is terminated without cause, or he or she resigns for good reason, depending upon the timing of his or her departure, he or she would be entitled to receive a higher purchase price for his or her B, C and D units, compared with if he or she terminated employment voluntarily, as described above under "Equity-Based Compensation". Under each executive officer's management unit subscription agreement, NMH Investment has the right to repurchase the units at a blend of cost and fair market value, depending on the circumstances of the executive officer's departure, including the date of departure. Fair market value is as determined in good faith by the management committee of NMH Investment (valuing the Company and its subsidiaries as a going concern, disregarding any discount for minority interest or marketability of the units).

        In addition, upon a change in control of the Company any unvested B units will vest immediately, and any unvested C and D units may vest if certain investment return conditions are met. The Company believes that such accelerated vesting could align the interests of the named executive officers with the interests of the indirect parent of the Company in the event of a sale of the Company by encouraging the named executive officers to remain with the Company and enhancing their focus on the Company during a sale of the Company.

46


Table of Contents

         Other Benefits.     The named executive officers are entitled to participate in group health and welfare benefits on the same basis as all regular, full-time employees. These benefits include medical, dental, vision care, flexible spending accounts, term life insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance and an employee assistance program. In addition, all employees, including the executive officers, have the option of purchasing supplemental group term life insurance for themselves as well as coverage for their spouses and dependent children.


Compensation Committee Report

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Respectfully submitted,

James L. Elrod, Jr.

47


Table of Contents


Fiscal 2008 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position
  Fiscal
Year
  Salary
($)(a)
  Equity
Awards
($)(b)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(c)
  Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(d)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(e)
  Total
($)
 

Edward M. Murphy

    2008     350,000     123,624     205,719     466     53,615     733,424  
 

President and Chief

    2007     350,000     60,918     155,275     1,865     53,459     621,517  
 

Executive Officer

                                           

Denis M. Holler

   
2008
   
275,000
   
111,602
   
84,352
   
323
   
36,610
   
507,887
 
 

Executive Vice President and

    2007     239,039     57,742     122,002     32,948     29,754     481,485  
 

Chief Financial Officer

                                           

Juliette E. Fay

   
2008
   
275,000
   
108,404
   
84,352
   
400
   
37,150
   
505,306
 
 

Executive Vice President and

    2007     275,000     56,566     122,002     6,967     37,060     497,595  
 

Chief Development Officer

                                           

Bruce F. Nardella

   
2008
   
275,000
   
111,413
   
84,352
   
325
   
36,610
   
507,700
 
 

Executive Vice President and

    2007     242,308     54,566     130,244     8,026     30,037     465,181  
 

Chief Operating Officer

                                           

David M. Petersen

   
2008
   
260,000
   
88,451
   
79,751
   
359
   
29,398
   
457,959
 
 

Senior Vice President and

    2007     252,885     52,215     123,139     3,042     28,064     459,345  
 

Redwood Operating Group

                                           
 

President

                                           

(a)
Includes individual's pre-tax contributions to health plans and contributions to retirement plans.

(b)
Figures represent compensation expense of equity awards under the NMH Investment, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Unit Plan as reflected in the Company's financial statements under SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123(R)), except that no estimate of forfeitures is made for the individuals listed in this table. Please refer to Note 21 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the relevant assumptions used to determine the compensation expense of our equity awards.

(c)
Represents cash bonuses under our annual incentive compensation plan.

(d)
Represents earnings in excess of the applicable federal long-term rate under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan.

(e)
All other compensation represents Company contributions credited to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, the Company match on executive contributions to the 401(k) plan and Executive Deferral Plan, which has been estimated for fiscal 2008 in advance of the actual determination. The fiscal 2007 amounts in this column were estimated at the time and have not been restated, as any differences were immaterial. Also included is Company paid parking and corresponding gross-ups, and imputed income on group term life insurance premiums. For fiscal 2008, the components of All Other Compensation were as follows:

 
  Contributions
to Executive
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
  Company
match on
contributions
to 401(k) and
Executive
Deferral Plan
  Company
paid parking
  Group
term life
insurance
 

Edward M. Murphy

    45,500     3,431     2,308     2,376  

Denis M. Holler

    30,250     3,431     2,285     621  

Juliette E. Fay

    30,250     3,431     2,285     1,161  

Bruce F. Nardella

    30,250     3,431     2,285     621  

David M. Petersen

    23,400     3,431     1,034     1,533  

48


Table of Contents


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2008

Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Name
  Threshold (a) ($)   Target (a) ($)   Maximum (a) ($)  

Edward M. Murphy

    175,000     350,000     525,000  

Denis M. Holler

    68,750     137,500     206,250  

Juliette E. Fay

    68,750     137,500     206,250  

Bruce F. Nardella

    68,750     137,500     206,250  

David M. Petersen

    65,000     130,000     195,000  

(a)
Amounts represent potential payouts relating to fiscal 2008, based on current base compensation.


Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan

Name
  Grant
Date
(a)
  Approval
Date
(b)
  Target
(#)
  All Other
Equity Awards:
Number and
Class of
Units
(#)(c)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
($)(d)
 

Edward M. Murphy

    8/22/08     7/31/08         664.13 B Units   $ 4,642.27  

                696.90 C Units       $ 4,634.39  

                26,095.96 D Units       $ 93,945.46  

Denis M. Holler

   
8/22/08
   
7/31/08
   
   
664.13 B Units
 
$

4,642.27
 

                696.90 C Units       $ 4,634.39  

                21,723.95 D Units       $ 78,206.22  

Juliette E. Fay

   
8/22/08
   
7/31/08
   
   
664.13 B Units
 
$

4,642.27
 

                696.90 C Units       $ 4,634.39  

                21,723.95 D Units       $ 78,206.22  

Bruce F. Nardella

   
8/22/08
   
7/31/08
   
   
664.13 B Units
 
$

4,642.27
 

                696.90 C Units       $ 4,634.39  

                21,723.95 D Units       $ 78,206.22  

David M. Petersen

   
8/25/08
   
7/31/08
   
   
664.13 B Units
 
$

4,642.27
 

                696.90 C Units       $ 4,634.39  

                15,603.14 D Units       $ 56,171.30  

(a)
Date on which the restricted units were transferred to the named executive officer in connection with compensatory grants under the NMH Investment, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Unit Plan, as amended.

(b)
Date on which the management committee of NMH Investment approved the equity award. The difference between the date these awards were approved and their grant date is due to a lapse of time between the approval date and the time that award documents to evidence these awards were finalized and executed.

(c)
Represents Class B, Class C and Class D Common Units in NMH Investment. See "Equity-Based Compensation", above, for details regarding the grants and the conditions under which they vest.

(d)
Reflects grant date fair value computed in accordance with FAS 123(R).

49


Table of Contents


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2008 Year End

        Shares and stock options are not included in this table because none were issued during the fiscal year and none were outstanding at fiscal year-end.

 
  Equity Incentive Plan Awards  
Name
  Number and Class
of Earned Equity
Not Vested
  Payout Value
of Earned Units
Not Vested(d)
  Number and Class
of Unearned Units
Not Vested(#)
  Payout Value
of Unearned
Units Not
Vested($)(d)
 

Edward M. Murphy

  664.13 Class B Units(a)     33.21   232.30 Class C Units(a)     6.97  

  464.60 Class C Units(a)     13.94   17,397.31 Class D Units(a)     173.97  

  8,698.65 Class D Units(a)     86.99   2,356.67 Class C Units(b)     70.70  

  6,737.50 Class B Units(b)     336.88   4,993.33 Class D Units(b)     49.93  

  4,713.33 Class C Units(b)     141.40            

  2,496.67 Class D Units(b)     24.97            

Denis M. Holler

 
664.13 Class B Units(a)
   
33.21
 
232.30 Class C Units(a)
   
6.97
 

  464.60 Class C Units(a)     13.94   14,482.63 Class D Units(a)     144.83  

  7,241.32 Class D Units(a)     72.41   2,188.33 Class C Units(b)     65.65  

  6,256.25 Class B Units(b)     312.81   4,636.67 Class D Units(b)     46.37  

  4,376.67 Class C Units(b)     131.30   168.33 Class C Units(c)     5.05  

  2,318.33 Class D Units(b)     23.18   356.67 Class D Units(c)     3.57  

  481.25 Class B Units(c)     24.06            

  336.67 Class C Units(c)     10.10            

  178.33 Class D Units(c)     1.78            

Juliette E. Fay

 
664.13 Class B Units(a)
   
33.21
 
232.30 Class C Units(a)
   
6.97
 

  464.60 Class C Units(a)     13.94   14,482.63 Class D Units(a)     144.83  

  7,241.32 Class D Units(a)     72.41   2,188.33 Class C Units(b)     65.65  

  6,256.25 Class B Units(b)     312.81   4,636.67 Class D Units(b)     46.37  

  4,376.67 Class C Units(b)     131.30            

  2,318.33 Class D Units(b)     23.18            

Bruce F. Nardella

 
664.13 Class B Units(a)
   
33.21
 
232.30 Class C Units(a)
   
6.97
 

  464.60 Class C Units(a)     13.94   14,482.63 Class D Units(a)     144.83  

  7,241.32 Class D Units(a)     72.41   2,020.00 Class C Units(b)     60.60  

  5,775.00 Class B Units(b)     288.75   4,280.00 Class D Units(b)     42.80  

  4,040.00 Class C Units(b)     121.20   336.67 Class C Units(c)     10.10  

  2,140.00 Class D Units(b)     21.40   713.33 Class D Units(c)     7.13  

  962.50 Class B Units(c)     48.13            

  673.33 Class C Units(c)     20.20            

  356.67 Class D Units(c)     3.57            

David M. Petersen

 
664.13 Class B Units(a)
   
33.21
 
232.30 Class C Units(a)
   
6.97
 

  464.60 Class C Units(a)     13.94   10,402.09 Class D Units(a)     104.02  

  5,201.05 Class D Units(a)     52.01   2,020.00 Class C Units(b)     60.60  

  5,775.00 Class B Units(b)     288.75   4,280.00 Class D Units(b)     42.80  

  4,040.00 Class C Units(b)     121.20            

  2,140.00 Class D Units(b)     21.40            

(a)
Granted in August 2008 in connection with compensatory grants under the NMH Investment, LLC 2006 Unit Plan, as amended. Exact dates are specified above, under Grants of Plan-Based Awards. The vesting measurement date, as set forth in the relevant subscription agreement, for these units is June 29, 2006. Assuming continued employment of the employee with the Company, 40 percent at the end of 37 months from the measurement date, and the remaining 60 percent vest monthly through the end of 61 months from the measurement date. The C and D Units vest three years after the measurement date. Vesting is explained in more detail above, under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity-Based Compensation".

50


Table of Contents

(b)
Granted on January 12, 2007 (or, in the case of Mr. Petersen, on January 15, 2007) in connection with the initial compensatory grants under the NMH Investment, LLC 2006 Unit Plan. The vesting measurement date, as set forth in the relevant subscription agreement, for these units is June 29, 2006. The B Units vest over five years and the C and D Units vest over three years, as explained in more detail above, under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity-Based Compensation".

(c)
Granted on August 14, 2007 in recognition of the named executive officer's promotion. The vesting measurement date, as set forth in the relevant subscription agreement, for these units is May 22, 2007, the date of the promotions. The B Units vest over five years and the C and D Units vest over three years, as explained in more detail above, under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity-Based Compensation".

(d)
Payout value represents fair market value determined as of fiscal year-end, which is $0.05 per B unit, $0.03 per C unit and $0.01 per D unit. For purposes of calculating fair market value, we assumed transaction costs in a change in control of the Company.


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

        No options were issued, outstanding or exercised during fiscal 2008. For purposes of this disclosure item, no units were vested during fiscal 2008 such that value was realized, as NMH Investment could repurchase at cost the units of any executive who terminated his or her employment voluntarily during fiscal 2008. However, if an executive officer were terminated without cause or resigned for good reason as of the last day of the fiscal year, he or she would be entitled to receive fair market value for a portion of his or her units. See "Estimated Change-in-Control/Severance Payments" below.


Pension Benefits

        The Company has no pension plans.


Fiscal 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name
  Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
($)(a)(b)
  Company
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
($)(b)(c)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
($)(b)(d)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(e)
  Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End
($)(f)
 

Edward M. Murphy

    10,500     47,040     3,010     8,712     166,651  

Denis M. Holler

    13,548     31,790     (69,393 )       447,821  

Juliette E. Fay

    23,798     31,790     (1,629 )       167,130  

Bruce F. Nardella

    32,474     31,790     (20,033 )   3,616     187,779  

David M. Petersen

    30,785     24,940     (4,054 )   9,116     152,447  

(a)
Represents amounts contributed to the Executive Deferral Plan during fiscal 2008. The Executive Deferral Plan is available to highly compensated employees to supplement the 401(k) plan. For details about the plan, see "Deferred Compensation", above.

(b)
All of the amounts reported under "Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year" and "Company Contributions in Last Fiscal Year" are reported as compensation for fiscal 2008 in the Summary Compensation Table. Under "Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year", the amounts in the

51


Table of Contents

    Summary Compensation Table that were in excess of the applicable federal long-term rate are as follows:

Edward M. Murphy

  $ 466  

Denis M. Holler

    323  

Juliette E. Fay

    400  

Bruce F. Nardella

    325  

David M. Petersen

    359  
(c)
Represents Company match (up to 1.5% of base salary) on executive contributions to the Executive Deferral Plan, plus Company contributions to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement to provide deferred compensation to senior management. For details about both these plans, see "Deferred Compensation", above.

(d)
Represents the 6% return credited to the participant's account in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for balances in fiscal 2008, plus the executives' respective returns for amounts invested in the Executive Deferral Plan.

(e)
Represents amounts withdrawn from the Executive Deferral Plan and deposited into the executive's respective 401(k) account in accordance with IRS rules.

(f)
Represents aggregate balances in Executive Deferral Plan and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for each executive as of fiscal year-end. Of the amounts in this column, the following amounts have been reported in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2007.

Edward M. Murphy

  $ 48,856  

Denis M. Holler

    26,866  

Juliette E. Fay

    33,606  

Bruce F. Nardella

    27,154  

David M. Petersen

    26,069  


Severance Agreements

        Mr. Murphy entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with us at the time of the Merger. The initial term is three years, after which the agreement will renew automatically each year for a one-year term, unless terminated earlier by the parties. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of $350,000 per year, subject to review and adjustment from time to time, with an annual bonus from the incentive compensation plan equal to no less than Mr. Murphy's base salary if the Company reaches certain yearly determined performance objectives. Under the terms of the agreement, if Mr. Murphy is terminated by the Company without "cause" or Mr. Murphy resigns with "good reason", the Company is obligated to continue to pay him his base salary and targeted incentive compensation for two years following the date of such termination, as well as a pro rata incentive compensation amount for the year in which such termination occurs. The definition of "cause" includes the commission of fraud or embezzlement, an indictment or conviction for a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, willful misconduct, violation of any material written policy of the Company, material neglect of duties, failure to comply with reasonable Board directives and material breach of any agreement with the Company or its securityholders or affiliates. The definition of "good reason" includes a material change in title, duties and responsibilities, a reduction in Officer's annual base salary or annual bonus opportunity (subject to certain exclusions), a material breach by the Company of the amended and restated employment agreement, and relocation of Mr. Murphy's principal place of work from its current location to a location that is beyond a 50-mile radius of such location.

52


Table of Contents

        The employment agreement contains provisions pursuant to which Mr. Murphy has agreed not to disclose our confidential information. Mr. Murphy has also agreed not to solicit our employees or contractors, nor compete with us for a period of two years after his employment with us has been terminated.

        Messrs. Holler, Nardella and Petersen and Ms. Fay entered severance agreements with us at the time of the Merger. Pursuant to these agreements, in the event that the employment of any such employees is terminated by the Company without "cause" or the named executive officer resigns with "good reason", they will be entitled to (i) the payment of an aggregate amount equal to their base salary for one year, (ii) the payment of an amount equal to their annual cash bonuses earned in the year prior to their severance and (iii) continued coverage under our health, medical and welfare benefit plans for a period of one year from the date of termination. "Cause" and "good reason" are defined as such terms are defined in Mr. Murphy's amended and restated employment agreement. The severance agreements also contain provisions pursuant to which the executive officer agrees not to disclose our confidential information, solicit our employees or contractors or compete with us for a period of one year after his or her employment with us has been terminated.


Estimated Severance and Change-in-Control Payments

        Mr. Murphy's amended and restated employment agreement and the severance agreements of the named executive officers provide for severance benefits in the event of termination under certain circumstances. The following table shows the amount of potential severance benefits for the named executive officers pursuant to their employment or severance arrangements, assuming the named executive officer was terminated under circumstances qualifying for the benefits and that termination occurred as of September 30, 2008, our fiscal year-end. The table also shows the estimated present value of continuing coverage for the benefits and the amount that would be paid for the repurchase of the B, C and D units in NMH Investment, assuming a termination without cause.

Name
  Salary
($)(a)
  Bonus
($)(b)
  Repurchase of
Restricted B,
C and D Units
($)(c)
  Value of
Continued
Benefits
($)(d)
  Total
($)
 

Edward M. Murphy

    700,000     700,000     939     45,013     1,445,952  

Denis M. Holler

    275,000     122,002     895     20,188     418,085  

Juliette E. Fay

    275,000     122,002     851     2,559     400,412  

Bruce F. Nardella

    275,000     130,244     895     23,219     429,358  

David M. Petersen

    260,000     123,139     745     16,199     400,083  

(a)
Under Mr. Murphy's employment agreement, salary continues for two years. For each of the other named executive officers, salary continues for one year. These amounts would be payable over time in accordance with the Company's regular payroll practices.

(b)
Mr. Murphy would receive an amount equal to his target annual bonus of 100 percent of base salary under the incentive compensation plan for two years after termination. Each of the other named executive officers would receive an amount equal to the actual annual bonus for the prior fiscal year. These amounts would be payable over time in accordance with the Company's regular payroll practices.

(c)
Represents the amount the executive officer would receive for the B, C and D units, including the original purchase price. The units may be called upon the executive officer's termination. Assuming a termination without cause on September 30, 2008, 45.50% of the B units would be purchased for fair market value as of September 30, with the remaining 54.50% purchased at the initial purchase price, in accordance with the applicable management unit subscription agreement. The C and D units would be purchased at fair market value. For purposes of calculating fair market value, we

53


Table of Contents

    included transaction costs assuming a change in control of the Company. The purchase price may be paid in the form of a promissory note at the discretion of NMH Investment.

(d)
Mr. Murphy would continue to participate in health and welfare benefit plans at the Company's expense for two years. All other named executive officers would participate in the health and welfare benefit plans for one year. Amounts are estimated based on the respective named executive officer's current benefit elections.

        Neither Mr. Murphy's employment agreement nor the named executive officer's severance agreements contain provisions for payments upon a change of control of the Company. However, assuming a change of control occurred at September 30, 2008, the Company's fiscal year-end, under the governing documents, all of the B units would vest, two-thirds of the C units would vest and one-third of the D units would vest. The fair market value of each named executive officer's vested B, C and D units, plus the initial purchase price of the remaining unvested C and D units, would be as estimated in the following table.

Name
  B Units($)   C Units ($)   D Units ($)   Total ($)  

Edward M. Murphy

    370.08     233.01     335.86     938.95  

Denis M. Holler

    370.08     233.01     292.14     895.23  

Juliette E. Fay

    346.02     217.86     286.79     850.67  

Bruce F. Nardella

    370.08     233.01     292.14     895.23  

David M. Petersen

    321.96     202.71     220.23     744.90  


Director Compensation

        We reimburse directors for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with services provided in such capacity. We compensate our outside directors as set out in the table below. Mr. Murphy receives no additional compensation for his service as a director, apart from his compensation as President and Chief Executive Officer. Messrs. Elrod, O'Connell and Mundt are employees of Vestar and do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors of the Company. Brian Ratzan, who served on the Board for part of the year, is also an employee of Vestar and received no additional compensation for his service.

Name
  Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash($)
  Equity
Awards
($)
  Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  All Other
Compensation($)
  Total ($)  

Gregory T. Torres

    100,000 (a)       594 (b)   258 (c)   100,852  

Jeffry A. Timmons

    14,000 (d)   (e)              

(a)
Mr. Torres is paid a salary of $100,000 per year in accordance with his amended and restated employment agreement.

(b)
Represents earnings in excess of the applicable federal long-term rate. Mr. Torres continues to accrue interest on amounts credited to him in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan during his service as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer.

(c)
Represents imputed income on group term life insurance.

(d)
Dr. Timmons received a fee of $5,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors that he attended in person and a fee of $1,000 for each meeting that he attended by phone and each committee meeting that he attended.

(e)
No compensation expense is reflected in the Company's financial statements in relation to Dr. Timmons' equity award. After his death, all of Dr. Timmons' compensation equity units were repurchased for the original purchase price, and the expense previously recorded was reversed.

54


Table of Contents


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        Mr. Elrod, who is currently the sole member of the Company's Compensation Committee, neither is nor has been an officer or employee of the Company. Mr. Elrod is a managing director of Vestar, which controls the Company. For a description of the transactions between us and Vestar, see Item 13. Apart from this relationship, Mr. Elrod has no relationship that would be required to be reported under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, nor did Dr. Timmons at the time of his death. Neither Mr. Elrod nor Dr. Timmons serves or served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company's Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

        NMH Investment is our ultimate parent and indirectly owns 100% of our equity securities. The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of voting equity interests of NMH Investment by (i) each person or entity known to us to beneficially hold five percent or more of equity interests of NMH Investment, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers and (iv) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

        Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such person's ownership percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other person's percentage. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.

        Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of the beneficial owners has, to the Company's knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated Class A Units which is the only class of voting equity interests in NMH Investment.

        Beneficial ownership has been determined as of December 1, 2008 in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act.

Name and address of Beneficial Owner
  Number of
Class A Units(1)(2)
  Percent of
Class A Units
 

Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P.(3)

    6,918,627     92.4 %

Gregory T. Torres

    25,000     *  

Edward M. Murphy

    130,000     1.7 %

Denis M. Holler

    40,169     *  

Juliette E. Fay

    41,750     *  

Bruce F. Nardella

    30,000     *  

David M. Petersen

    31,200     *  

James L. Elrod, Jr.(4)

         

Pamela F. Lenehan(5)

         

Kevin A. Mundt(4)

         

Daniel S. O'Connell(4)

         

All directors and executive officers (15 persons)

    415,637     5.5 %

*
Less than 1.0%.

55


Table of Contents

(1)
In addition, certain members of management own non-voting Preferred Units, Class B Units, Class C Units and Class D Units, which are not reflected in the table above. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management Unit Subscription Agreements" for additional information.

(2)
The Preferred Units and 30% of Class A Units held by the management investors were vested with respect to appreciation immediately upon issuance, assuming continued employment with the Company, and the remaining 70% of Class A Units vest over time. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management Unit Subscription Agreements" for additional information.

(3)
In addition, Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P. (the "Fund") owns 1,728,137 Preferred Units, representing approximately 96.8% of the Preferred Units, of NMH Investment. Vestar Associates V, L.P. is the general partner of the Fund, having voting and investment power over membership interests held or controlled by the Fund. Vestar Managers V, Ltd. ("VMV") is the general partner of Vestar Associates V, L.P. Each of Vestar Associates V, L.P. and VMV disclaims beneficial ownership of any membership interests in NMH Investment beneficially owned by the Fund. The address of Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P. is 245 Park Avenue, 41st Floor, New York, NY 10167.

(4)
Mr. O'Connell is the Chief Executive Officer of Vestar and Messrs. Elrod and Mundt are Managing Directors of Vestar. Each of Messrs. O'Connell, Elrod and Mundt disclaims beneficial ownership of any membership interests in NMH Investment beneficially owned by the Fund, except to the extent of his indirect pecuniary interest therein.

(5)
Ms. Lenehan was elected to the Board effective December 1, 2008, and has the right to subscribe for 2,750 Class A Common Units. We expect the issuance to close during the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Limited Liability Company Agreement

        Under the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the "Limited Liability Company Agreement") of NMH Investment, by and among NMH Investment, Vestar, an affiliate of Vestar, the management investors and future parties to such agreement, the initial management committee consists of seven members elected by a plurality vote of all of the holders of NMH Investment's Class A Units. With the election of Pamela F. Lenehan, the management committee currently has six members. Any member of the management committee may be removed at any time by the holders of a majority of the total voting power of the outstanding Class A Units. The management committee currently consists of the same individuals as our board of directors.

        The management committee manages and controls the business and affairs of NMH Investment and has the power to, among other things, amend the Limited Liability Company Agreement, approve any significant corporate transactions and appoint officers. It can also delegate such authority by agreement or authorization.

        The Limited Liability Company Agreement also contains agreements among the parties with respect to the allocation of net income and net loss and the distribution of assets.

Management Unit Subscription Agreements

        In connection with the Merger, NMH Investment entered into several agreements with management investors and with the Chairman, Mr. Torres, pursuant to which such investors subscribed for and purchased Preferred Units and Class A Units (which is the only class of voting equity interests in NMH Investment). The Preferred Units and 30% of the Class A Units were vested with respect to

56


Table of Contents


appreciation upon issuance. On July 5, 2007, NMH Holdings paid a dividend to its parent, NMH Investment, which was used by NMH Investment to pay a return of capital with respect to its Preferred Units.

        In addition, NMH Investment has entered into agreements with management investors whereby such management investors purchased non-voting Class B Units, Class C Units and Class D Units. These units' right to share in an increase in value of NMH Investment will vest according to schedules that include various time and performance targets, investment return conditions and certain other events set forth in the management unit subscription agreement and NMH Investment's Limited Liability Company Agreement. The Class B Units vest over 61 months. Assuming continued employment of the employee with the Company, 40 percent vest at the end of 37 months from the grant date, and the remaining 60 percent vest monthly over the remainder of the term. Assuming continued employment, the Class C Units and Class D Units vest after three years, subject to certain performance conditions and/or investment return conditions being met or achieved. The performance conditions relate to the Company achieving certain financial targets for fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, and the investment return conditions relate to Vestar receiving a specified multiple on its investment upon a liquidation event. In the aggregate, Class B, Class C and Class D units represent the right to receive up to approximately an additional 9.4% of the increase in value of the common equity interests in NMH Investment. NMH Investment issued additional Class B, Class C and Class D Units to certain management investors during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

        NMH Investment may be required to purchase all of a management investor's units in the event of such investor's disability, death or retirement. In addition, NMH Investment has the right to purchase all or a portion of a management investor's units upon the termination of such investor's active employment with the Company or its affiliates. The price at which the units will be purchased will vary depending on a number of factors, including (i) the circumstances of such termination of employment and on whether the management investor engages in certain proscribed competitive activities following employment, (ii) the length of time such units were held and (iii) the financial performance of NMH Investment over a certain specified time period. However, NMH Investment shall not be obligated to purchase any units at any time to the extent that the purchase of such units, or a payment to NMH Investment by one of its subsidiaries in order to fund such purchase, would result in a violation of law, a financing default or adverse accounting consequences, or if a financing default exists which prohibits such purchase or payment. From time to time, NMH Investment may enter into additional management subscription agreements with the management investors or additional members of management pursuant to which it may issue additional units.

Director Unit Subscription Agreements

        In connection with his election to our board of directors in December 2006, Jeffry A. Timmons entered into a Director Unit Subscription Agreement (the "DUSA"), among NMH Investment, himself, and Fiddlewood Farms Investments, LLC ("Fiddlewood"), a limited liability company controlled by Dr. Timmons and his spouse. Under the DUSA, Dr. Timmons subscribed for and assigned to Fiddlewood, the right to acquire specified amounts of Preferred Units, Class A Common Units and Class E Common Units of NMH Investment. Under the DUSA, Dr. Timmons invested approximately $125,319 in NMH Investment units. After Dr. Timmons' death in April 2008, NMH Investment purchased all of Dr. Timmons' units for a total of $73,777 which included an accretion of $2,664 earned on the Preferred Units. Previously, in July 2007, Dr. Timmons received a return of capital of $54,206 in connection with the NMH Holdings note transaction, which is described in note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

57


Table of Contents

        In connection with her election to our board of directors, Pamela F. Lenehan was offered the opportunity to subscribe for specified amounts of Preferred Units, Class A Common Units and Class E Common Units of NMH Investment for an aggregate of $125,159. We expect the issuance to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Securityholders Agreement

        Pursuant to the Securityholders Agreement among NMH Investment, Vestar, an affiliate of Vestar, the management investors, Mr. Torres and any future parties to such agreement (collectively, the "Securityholders"), the units of NMH Investment beneficially owned by the Securityholders are subject to certain restrictions on transfer, as well as the other provisions described below.

        The Securityholders Agreement provides that the Securityholders will vote all of their units to elect and continue in office a management committee or board of directors of NMH Investment and each of its subsidiaries consisting of up to seven members or directors composed of:

    (a)
    up to six designees of Vestar, initially not more than three of whom shall be employees of Vestar; and

    (b)
    the Company's chief executive officer.

        In addition, each Securityholder has agreed, subject to certain limited exceptions, that he or she will vote all of his units as directed by Vestar in connection with amendments to NMH Investment's organizational documents, mergers or other business combinations, the disposition of all or substantially all of NMH Investment's property and assets, reorganizations, recapitalizations or the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NMH Investment.

        Prior to the earlier of (i) a sale of a majority of the equity or voting interests of NMH Investment, NMH Holdings, LLC or certain of their holding company subsidiaries, or in a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of NMH Investment and its subsidiaries, except for any transactions with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vestar or of NMH Investment and (ii) the fifth anniversary of the date of purchase, the investors will be prohibited from transferring units to a third party, subject to certain exceptions.

        The Securityholders Agreement provides (i) the management with "tag-along" rights with respect to transfers of securities beneficially owned by Vestar, its partners or their transferees, and (ii) Vestar with "take-along" rights with respect to securities owned by the investors in a sale of a majority of the equity or voting interests of NMH Investment, Parent or certain of their holding company subsidiaries, or in a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of NMH Investment and its subsidiaries. In addition, Vestar has certain rights to require NMH Investment (or its successors) to register securities held by it under the Securities Act up to eight times, and Vestar and the other Securityholders have certain rights to participate in publicly registered offerings of NMH Investment's common equity initiated by NMH Investment or other third parties.

Management Agreement

        Vestar and the Company are parties to a management agreement relating to certain advisory and consulting services rendered by Vestar. In consideration of those services, the Company has agreed to pay to Vestar an aggregate per annum management fee equal to the greater of (i) $850,000 and (ii) an amount per annum equal to 1.00% of the Company's consolidated earnings before depreciation, amortization, interest and taxes for each fiscal year before deduction of Vestar's fee, determined as set forth in the Company's senior secured credit facilities. The Company also agreed to pay Vestar a transaction fee equal to $7.5 million plus all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Vestar prior to the completion of the Merger for services rendered by Vestar in connection with the consummation of the Merger. This transaction fee is recorded in goodwill and deferred financing in the September 30, 2006

58


Table of Contents


balance sheet. The Company also agreed to indemnify Vestar and its affiliates from and against all losses, claims, damages and liabilities arising out of the performance by Vestar of its services pursuant to the management agreement. The management agreement will terminate at such time as Vestar and its partners and their respective affiliates hold, directly or indirectly in the aggregate, less than 20% of the voting power of the Company's outstanding voting stock.

Indemnification Agreements

        The Company and NMH Holdings are parties to an indemnification agreement with each of the Company's directors and executive officers. Under the form of indemnification agreement, directors and executive officers are indemnified against certain expenses, judgments and other losses resulting from involvement in legal proceedings arising from service as a director or executive officer. NMH Holdings will advance expenses incurred by directors or executive officers in defending against such proceedings, and indemnification is generally not available for proceedings brought by an indemnified person (other than to enforce his or her rights under the indemnification agreement). If an indemnified person elects or is required to pay all or any portion of any judgment or settlement for which NMH Holdings is jointly liable, NMH Holdings will contribute to the expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement incurred by the indemnified person in proportion to the relative benefits received by NMH Holdings (and its officers, directors and employees other than the indemnified person) and the indemnified person, as may, to the extent necessary to conform to law, be further adjusted by reference to the relative fault of the Company (and its officers, directors and employees other than the indemnified person) and the indemnified person in connection with the events that resulted in such losses, as well as any other equitable considerations which the law may require to be considered. The Company is a guarantor of NMH Holdings' obligations under this agreement.

Alliance Health and Human Services, Inc.

        Prior to joining the Company in September 2004, Edward Murphy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, was a member of the board of directors of Alliance Health and Human Services, Inc. and its President. Mr. Murphy had served in these capacities at Alliance since he founded it in 1999 and was instrumental in establishing and developing Alliance's service contracts with the Company to provide ARY services in states that prefer or choose not to enter into contracts with for-profit corporations. Upon joining the Company, Mr. Murphy resigned from all of his positions with Alliance and no longer has any financial interest in Alliance. Approximately 3% of our net revenues for fiscal 2008 are derived from contracts with Alliance.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

        As a debt-only issuer, our related party transactions are generally reviewed by our board of directors, although we have not historically had formal policies and procedures regarding the review and approval of related party transactions.

Director Independence

        Our board is currently composed of six directors: Gregory T. Torres and Edward M. Murphy, who are employed by the Company; Daniel S. O'Connell, James L. Elrod, Jr. and Kevin A. Mundt, who are employed by Vestar; and Pamela F. Lenehan. Of these directors, only Ms. Lenehan would likely qualify as an independent director based on the definition of independent director set forth in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace rules. Under Nasdaq Marketplace rules, we are considered a "controlled company" because more than 50% of our voting power is held by a single person. Accordingly, even if we were a listed company on Nasdaq, we would not be required by Nasdaq Marketplace rules to maintain a majority of independent directors on our board, nor would we be required by Nasdaq Marketplace rules to maintain a compensation committee or nominating committee

59


Table of Contents


comprised entirely of independent directors. No members of management serve on either the audit or compensation committees. Mr. Mundt and Ms. Lenehan serve on our audit committee and Mr. Elrod serves on our compensation committee.

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

        Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for us by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, were:

 
  2008   2007  
 
  (in thousands)
 

Audit fees(1)

  $ 979   $ 1,230  

Audit related fees(2)

    124     142  

Tax fees(3)

    219     125  
           
 

Total fees

  $ 1,322   $ 1,497  
           

(1)
Audit fees primarily include professional services rendered for the audits of our consolidated financial statements and for our quarterly reviews, as well as, services related to other statutory and regulatory filings. Audit fees also include services rendered in connection with the offering of the senior floating rate toggle notes in fiscal 2007.

(2)
Audit related fees primarily include due diligence services and services related to financial reporting that are not required by regulation.

(3)
Tax fees primarily include professional services rendered for tax services during the fiscal year indicated.

Preapproval Policies and Procedures

        The Audit Committee preapproves all services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

60


Table of Contents


PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements

        The following consolidated financial statements on pages F-1 through F-34 are filed as part of this report.

    Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 (Successor) and September 30, 2007 (Successor);

    Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2008 (Successor), the year ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor);

    Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock and Shareholders' Equity for the year ended September 30, 2008 (Successor), the year ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor);


    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended September 30, 2008 (Successor), the year ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor).

(2)
Financial Statement Schedules:     Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is provided in our consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)
Exhibits :    The Exhibit Index is incorporated by reference herein.

61


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    NATIONAL MENTOR HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: December 22, 2008        

 

 

By:

 

/s/ EDWARD M. MURPHY

Edward M. Murphy
    Its:   President and Chief Executive Officer

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below as of December 22, 2008 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

/s/ GREGORY T. TORRES


Gregory T. Torres
 

Chairman and Director

/s/ EDWARD M. MURPHY


Edward M. Murphy
 

President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Director

/s/ DENIS M. HOLLER


Denis M. Holler
 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

/s/ DANIEL S. O'CONNELL


Daniel S. O'Connell
 

Director

/s/ JAMES L. ELROD, JR.


James L. Elrod, Jr.
 

Director

/s/ KEVIN A. MUNDT


Kevin A. Mundt
 

Director

62


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.
  Description    
  2.1   Merger Agreement between National MENTOR Holdings, Inc., NMH Holdings, LLC, and NMH MergerSub Inc., dated as of March 22, 2006.   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Form S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-138362) filed on November 1, 2006 (the "S-4")

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the "March 2007 10-Q")

 

3.2

 

By-Laws of National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the March 2007 10-Q

 

4.1

 

Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2006, by and among National Mentor Holdings, Inc., the guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the S-4

 

4.2

 

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 11, 2007, by and among National Mentor Holdings, Inc., Rockland Child Development Services, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-138362) filed on January 12, 2007 (the "S-4/A")

 

4.3

 

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2008, by and among National Mentor Holdings, Inc., Transitional Services Sub, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the "June 2008 10-Q")

 

4.4

 

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2008, by and among National Mentor Holdings, Inc., CareMeridian, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

Filed herewith

 

4.5

 

Form of Senior Subordinated Note (attached as exhibit to Exhibit 4.1).

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the S-4

 

10.1.1

 

Credit Agreement, dated June 29, 2006, among NMH Holdings, LLC, National MENTOR Holdings, Inc., the several lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the S-4

 

10.1.2

 

First Amendment, dated February 28, 2007, to Credit Agreement, dated June 29, 2006.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 of the March 2007 10-Q

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.
  Description    
  10.2   Term Loan Agreement, dated May 20, 2005, among National MENTOR Holdings, Inc., National MENTOR, Inc., REM Arrowhead, Inc., REM Connecticut Community Services, Inc., REM Indiana, Inc., REM North Dakota, Inc., REM Wisconsin I, Inc., REM Wisconsin II, Inc., REM Wisconsin III, Inc., and certain other Borrowers, and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the S-4

 

10.3

 

Amendment No. 1 to Term Loan Agreement and Joinder Agreement, dated June 29, 2006, among NMH Holdings, LLC, National Mentor Holdings, Inc., National Mentor, Inc., REM Arrowhead, Inc., REM Connecticut Community Services, Inc., REM Indiana, Inc., REM North Dakota, Inc., REM Wisconsin, Inc., REM Wisconsin II, Inc., REM Wisconsin III, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the S-4

 

10.4*

 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2006, between National MENTOR Holdings, Inc. and Edward Murphy.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the S-4

 

10.5*

 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2006, between National MENTOR Holdings, Inc. and Gregory Torres.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the S-4

 

10.6*

 

Form of Severance and Noncompetition Agreement.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the S-4

 

10.7

 

Management Services Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2006, between National Mentor Holdings, Inc., National Mentor, Inc., NMH Investment, LLC, NMH Holdings, LLC and Vestar Capital Partners.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the S-4

 

10.8*

 

National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2006.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2007

 

10.9*

 

National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferral Plan, dated November 1, 2003.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the S-4

 

10.10*

 

The MENTOR Network Executive Leadership Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the S-4

 

10.11*

 

The MENTOR Network Executive Leadership Incentive Plan for fiscal year ended September 30, 2007—Summary of Material Terms.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007

 

10.12*

 

Form of Management Unit Subscription Agreement.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the S-4/A

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.
  Description    
  10.13*   Form of Director Unit Subscription Agreement.   Filed herewith

 

10.14*

 

NMH Investment, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Unit Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the S-4/A

 

10.15*

 

Amendment to NMH Investment, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Unit Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the June 2008 Form 10-Q

 

10.16*

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. Form 8-K filed on December 10, 2008

 

21

 

Subsidiaries.

 

Filed herewith

 

31.1

 

Certification of principal executive officer.

 

Filed herewith

 

31.2

 

Certification of principal financial officer.

 

Filed herewith

 

32

 

Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

 

Filed herewith

*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents

National Mentor Holdings, Inc.
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Contents

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended September 30, 2008, the year ended September 30, 2007, the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006, and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006.

     

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-2  

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 (Successor) and 2007 (Successor)

  F-3  

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2008 (Successor), the year ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor) and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor). 

  F-4  

Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock and Shareholders' Equity for the year ended September 30, 2008 (Successor), the year ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor). 

  F-5  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended September 30, 2008 (Successor), the year ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor). 

  F-6  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-7  

F-1


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Audit Committee of National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. as of September 30, 2008 (Successor) and 2007 (Successor), and the related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable preferred stock and shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2008 (Successor) and 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. at September 30, 2008 (Successor) and 2007 (Successor), and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2008 (Successor) and 2007 (Successor), the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 (Successor), and the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 (Predecessor), in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        As discussed in Notes 2 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements, effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 15, 2008

F-2


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 
  September 30  
 
  Successor  
 
  2008   2007  

Assets

             

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 38,908   $ 29,373  
 

Restricted cash

    5,773     4,311  
 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,057 and $5,091 at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively

    113,933     116,476  
 

Deferred tax assets, net

    10,355     8,339  
 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

    23,268     18,103  
           

Total current assets

    192,237     176,602  
 

Property and equipment, net

    144,233     137,972  
 

Intangible assets, net

    462,987     489,769  
 

Goodwill

    199,392     188,255  
 

Other assets

    17,584     20,030  
           

Total assets

  $ 1,016,433   $ 1,012,628  
           

Liabilities and shareholders' equity

             

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable

  $ 20,840   $ 22,534  
 

Accrued payroll and related costs

    59,146     55,436  
 

Other accrued liabilities

    52,437     37,340  
 

Obligations under capital lease, current

    201     248  
 

Current portion of long-term debt

    3,735     3,747  
           

Total current liabilities

    136,359     119,305  
 

Other long-term liabilities

    10,859     7,958  
 

Deferred tax liabilities, net

    122,103     127,034  
 

Obligations under capital lease, less-current portion

    1,806     179  
 

Long-term debt, less current portion

    508,178     512,121  

Commitments and contingencies

             

Shareholders' equity

             
 

Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2008 and 2007, 100 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 2007

         
 

Additional paid-in capital

    256,648     254,618  
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

    (5,781 )   (2,431 )
 

Accumulated deficit

    (13,739 )   (6,156 )
           

Total shareholders' equity

    237,128     246,031  
           

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 1,016,433   $ 1,012,628  
           

See accompanying notes.

F-3


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in thousands)

 
  Successor   Predecessor  
 
   
   
  Period From
June 30
Through
September 30
2006
  Period From
October 1
Through
June 29
2006
 
 
  Year Ended September 30  
 
  2008   2007  

Net revenues

  $ 962,929   $ 910,099   $ 208,881   $ 580,356  

Cost of revenues

    732,298     688,939     160,164     439,878  
                   

Gross profit

    230,631     221,160     48,717     140,478  

Operating expenses:

                         
 

General and administrative

    135,116     122,980     29,738     78,608  
 

Stock option settlement

                26,880  
 

Transaction costs

                9,136  
 

Depreciation and amortization

    51,625     50,748     11,714     17,539  
                   

Total operating expenses

    186,741     173,728     41,452     132,163  
                   

Income from operations

    43,890     47,432     7,265     8,315  

Other income (expense):

                         
 

Management fee of related party

    (1,349 )   (892 )   (227 )   (198 )
 

Other expense, net

    (875 )   (416 )   (60 )   (177 )
 

Interest income

    684     1,060     256     646  
 

Interest expense

    (48,433 )   (50,159 )   (13,120 )   (51,719 )
                   

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

    (6,083 )   (2,975 )   (5,886 )   (43,133 )

Benefit for income taxes

    (177 )   (483 )   (2,222 )   (11,347 )
                   

Loss from continuing operations

    (5,906 )   (2,492 )   (3,664 )   (31,786 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (1,329 )            
                   

Net loss

  $ (7,235 ) $ (2,492 ) $ (3,664 ) $ (31,786 )
                   

See accompanying notes.

F-4


Table of Contents

National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock

and Shareholders' Equity

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 
  Common Stock    
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
  Additional Paid-in Capital   Deferred Compensation   Accumulated other Comprehensive Loss   Note Receivable From Officer   Accumulated Deficit   Total Shareholders' Equity    
 
 
  Shares   Amount   Comprehensive Loss  

Balance at September 30, 2005 (Predecessor)

    10,203,109     102     42,252     (229 )       (49 )   (5,766 )   36,310        

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

    (66,124 )   (1 )                   (1,487 )   (1,488 )    

Deferred compensation amortization related to Stock Options

                59                 59      

Stock based compensation

            525                     525      

Repayment of note receivable from officer

                        49         49      

Net loss

                            (31,786 )   (31,786 )   (31,786 )
                                       

Comprehensive loss

                                  $ (31,786 )
                                                       

Balance at June 29, 2006 (Predecessor)

    10,136,985   $ 101   $ 42,777   $ (170 ) $   $   $ (39,039 ) $ 3,669        
                                         

Equity contributions from NMH Investment, LLC

    100         253,627                     253,627        

Other comprehensive loss related to interest rate swap, net of tax

                    (1,095 )           (1,095 )   (1,095 )

Net loss

                            (3,664 )   (3,664 )   (3,664 )
                                       

Comprehensive loss

                                  $ (4,759 )
                                                       

Balance at September 30, 2006 (Successor)

    100         253,627         (1,095 )       (3,664 )   248,868        
                                         

Parent capital contribution

            142                     142        

Stock based compensation

            849                     849        

Other comprehensive loss related to interest rate swap, net of tax

                    (1,336 )           (1,336 )   (1,336 )

Net loss

                            (2,492 )   (2,492 )   (2,492 )
                                       

Comprehensive loss

                                  $ (3,829 )
                                                       

Balance at September 30, 2007 (Successor)

    100   $   $ 254,618   $   $ (2,431 ) $   $ (6,156 ) $ 246,031        
                                         

Stock based compensation

            2,215                     2,215        

Parent capital contribution

            3                     3        

Distribution to parent

            (188 )                   (188 )      

Adoption of FIN 48

                            (348 )   (348 )      

Other comprehensive loss related to interest rate swap, net of tax

                    (3,350 )           (3,350 )   (3,350 )

Net loss

                            (7,235 )   (7,235 )   (7,235 )
                                       

Comprehensive loss

                                  $ (10,585 )
                                                       

Balance at September 30, 2008 (Successor)

    100   $   $ 256,648   $   $ (5,781 ) $   $ (13,739 ) $ 237,128        
                                         

See accompanying notes.

F-5


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

 
  Successor   Predecessor  
 
  Year Ended September 30,   Period From
June 30
Through
September 30
2006
  Period From
October 1
Through
June 29
2006
 
 
  2008   2007  

Operating activities

                         

Net loss

  $ (7,235 ) $ (2,492 ) $ (3,664 ) $ (31,786 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

                         
 

Accounts receivable allowances

    9,526     8,435     1,412     3,641  
 

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment

    19,311     18,524     4,112     10,276  
 

Amortization of other intangible assets

    32,315     32,224     7,602     7,263  
 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

    3,388     3,185     743     8,634  
 

Amortization of excess tax goodwill

                305  
 

Stock based compensation

    2,215     849         583  
 

Gain on disposal of business units

    (52 )            
 

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

    874     859     69     192  
 

Loss from discontinued operations

    2,119     —-     —-     —-  
 

Asset impairment charge

    —-     1,124          

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                         
   

Accounts receivable

    (6,406 )   (20,916 )   (1,350 )   (15,174 )
   

Other assets

    (5,508 )   5,512     2,071     (10,548 )
   

Accounts payable

    (1,934 )   1,296     (6,199 )   11,755  
   

Accrued payroll and related costs

    3,661     5,151     (21,052 )   34,688  
   

Other accrued liabilities

    5,549     2,571     (18,136 )   23,107  
   

Deferred taxes

    (4,673 )   (6,171 )   (2,426 )   (5,102 )
   

Restricted cash

    (1,462 )   (1,807 )   (925 )   3,021  
   

Other long-term liabilities

    1,905     4,410     506     (124 )
                   

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    53,593     52,754     (37,237 )   40,731  

Investing activities

                         

Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash received

    (14,895 )   (25,074 )   (5,378 )   (30,400 )

Cash paid for acquisition of predecessor company

            (371,162 )    

Purchases of property and equipment

    (26,105 )   (19,662 )   (5,821 )   (9,976 )

Cash proceeds from sale of business units

    148              

Cash proceeds from discontinued operations

    340              

Cash proceeds from sale of property and equipment

    1,488     1,520     208     528  
                   

Net cash used in investing activities

    (39,024 )   (43,216 )   (382,153 )   (39,848 )

Financing activities

                         

Repayments of long-term debt

    (3,957 )   (4,498 )   (315,058 )   (10,608 )

Repayments of capital lease obligations

    (273 )   (432 )   (141 )   (325 )

Distribution to parent

    (188 )            

Proceeds from officer notes

                49  

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

            515,000      

Parent capital contribution

    3     142     253,627      

Purchase and retirement of preferred and common stock

                (1,488 )

Payments of deferred financing costs

    (619 )   (1,888 )   (20,095 )   (650 )
                   

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

    (5,034 )   (6,676 )   433,333     (13,022 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    9,535     2,862     13,943     (12,139 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    29,373     26,511     12,568     24,707  
                   

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 38,908   $ 29,373   $ 26,511   $ 12,568  
                   

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid for interest

  $ 45,073   $ 47,716   $ 6,309   $ 49,530  

Cash (paid) refunded for income taxes

  $ (153 ) $ 7,431   $ 1,892   $ (3,335 )

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:

                         

Capital lease obligation incurred to acquire assets

  $ 1,805   $ 54   $   $ 116  

See accompanying notes.

F-6


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2008

1. Basis of Presentation

        National Mentor Holdings, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company"), is a leading provider of home and community-based human services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, at-risk children and youth with emotional, behavioral or medically complex needs and their families, and persons with an acquired brain injury. Since the Company's founding in 1980, the Company has grown to provide services to more than 23,000 clients in 35 states and the District of Columbia. The Company designs customized service plans to meet the unique needs of its clients in home- and community-based settings. Most of the Company's services involve residential support, typically in small group home or host home settings, designed to improve the Company's clients' quality of life and to promote client independence and participation in community life. Other services that the Company provides include day programs, vocational services, case management, early intervention, family-based services, post-acute treatment and neurorehabilitation services, among others. The Company's customized services offer the Company's clients, as well as the payors for these services, an attractive, cost-effective alternative to human services provided in large, institutional settings.

        On June 29, 2006, NMH MergerSub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NMH Investment, LLC, merged with and into the Company, and the Company was the surviving corporation (the "Merger"). Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P. ("Vestar"), certain affiliates of Vestar and members of management and certain of the Company's directors own NMH Investment, LLC and, therefore, own the Company.

        The term "successor" refers to the Company following the Merger and related transactions (the "Transactions") on June 29, 2006 and the term "predecessor" refers to the Company prior to these transactions. The operating and cash flows results for the predecessor period October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 reflect the operating results of the Company through June 30, 2006, as one day of operations is not deemed material to present separately.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

        The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Since future events and the impact of those events cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results may differ from the Company's estimates. These differences could be material to the financial statements.

        These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.

F-7


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Cash Equivalents

        The Company considers short-term investments with maturity dates of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents primarily consist of money market funds and overnight repurchase investments. The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates fair value due to their short-term maturity.

Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash consists of cash related to certain insurance coverage provided by the Company's captive insurance subsidiary. In addition, restricted cash includes funds provided from government payors restricted for client use.

Financial Instruments

        Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, certain accrued liabilities and debt. These instruments are carried at cost, which approximates their respective fair values. For additional information, see note 12.

Concentrations of Credit and Other Risks

        Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are deposited with federally insured commercial banks in the United States. The Company derives most of its revenues from states, counties and regional governmental agencies. These entities fund a significant portion of their payments to the Company through federal matching funds, which pass through various state and local government agencies.

        The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Accounts are currently guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250 thousand. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Revenue Recognition

        Revenues are reported net of any state provider taxes or gross receipts taxes levied on services the Company provides. Revenues are also reported net of allowances for unauthorized sales and estimated sales adjustments by business units. Sales adjustments are estimated based on an analysis of historical sales adjustments and recent developments in the payment trends in each business unit. The Company follows Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), which requires that revenue can only be recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable.

        The Company recognizes revenues for services performed pursuant to contracts with various state and local government agencies and private health care agencies as follows: cost-reimbursement contract revenues are recognized at the time the service costs are incurred and units-of-service contract revenues are recognized at the time the service is provided. For the Company's cost-reimbursement contracts, the rate provided by the payor is based on a certain level of service and types of costs incurred in

F-8


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


delivering the service. From time to time, the Company receives payments under cost-reimbursement contracts in excess of the allowable costs required to support those payments. In such instances, the Company estimates and records a liability for such excess payments. At the end of the contract period, any balance of excess payments is maintained as a liability until it is reimbursed to the payor. Revenues in the future may be affected by changes in rate-setting structures, methodologies or interpretations that may be enacted in states where the Company operates or by the federal government.

Cost of Revenues

        The Company classifies expenses directly related to providing services as cost of revenues, except for depreciation and amortization related to cost of revenues, which are shown separately in the consolidated statements of operations. Direct costs and expenses principally include salaries and benefits for service provider employees, per diem payments to Mentors, residential occupancy expenses, which are primarily comprised of rent and utilities related to facilities providing direct care, certain client expenses such as food and medicine and transportation costs for clients requiring services.

Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Company provides for depreciation using straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Estimated useful lives for buildings are 30 years. The useful lives of computer hardware and software are three years, the useful lives for furniture and equipment range from three to ten years, and the useful lives for vehicles are five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease term or the useful life of the property and the leasehold amortization is included in depreciation expense. Capital lease assets are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the useful life. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses as incurred.

Capitalized Software Developed for Internal Use

        The Company accounts for software developed for internal use under Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1), and Emerging Task Force Issue 00-2, Accounting for Website Development Costs (EITF 00-2). Costs incurred by the Company to enhance, manage, monitor and operate the Company's website are expensed as incurred, except for costs that provide additional functionality, which are capitalized in accordance with SOP 98-1 and EITF 00-2.

Accounts Receivables

        Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from government agencies, not-for-profit providers and commercial insurance companies. An estimated allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected. In evaluating the collectibility of accounts receivable, the Company considers a number of factors, including payment trends in individual states, age of the accounts and the status of ongoing disputes with third party payors. Complex rules and regulations regarding billing and timely filing requirements in various states are also a factor in the Company's assessment of the collectibility of accounts

F-9


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


receivable. Actual collections of accounts receivable in subsequent periods may require changes in the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. Changes in these estimates are charged or credited to revenue in the consolidated statement of operations in the period of the change in estimate.

Accruals for Self-Insurance

        The Company maintains professional and general liability, workers' compensation, automobile liability and health insurance policies that include self-insured retentions. The Company records expenses related to claims on an incurred basis, which includes estimates of fully developed losses for both reported and unreported claims. The accruals for the health and workers compensation, automobile and professional and general liability programs are based on actuarially determined estimates. Accruals relating to prior periods are periodically reevaluated and increased or decreased based on new information. As such, these changes in estimates are recorded as charges or credits to the consolidated statement of operations in a period subsequent to the change in estimate.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), the Company reviews costs of purchased businesses in excess of net assets acquired (goodwill), and indefinite-life intangible assets for impairment at least annually, unless significant changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment may have occurred sooner.

        The Company is required to test goodwill on a reporting unit basis. The Company uses a fair value approach to test goodwill for impairment and recognizes an impairment charge for the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds fair value. The impairment test for indefinite-life intangible assets requires the determination of the fair value of the intangible asset. If the fair value of the intangible asset were less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the difference. Fair values are established using discounted cash flow and comparative market multiple methods. The Company conducts the annual impairment test on July 1 of each year, and as of the date of the last test, there was no impairment and there have been no indicators of impairment since the date of the test.

        Discounted cash flows are based on management's estimates of the Company's future performance. As such, actual results may differ from these estimates and lead to a revaluation of the Company's goodwill and intangible assets. If updated calculations indicate that the fair value of goodwill or any indefinite-life intangibles is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge would be recorded in the consolidated statement of operations in the period of the change in estimate.

        Pursuant to SFAS 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144), the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based on the undiscounted future cash flows of the

F-10


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded based upon various techniques to estimate fair value.

Income Taxes

        The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). Under SFAS 109, the asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined by multiplying the differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting bases for assets and liabilities by the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such differences are recovered or settled. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are separated into current and long-term amounts based on the classification of the related assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets are estimated based on the Company's assessment of the realizability of such amounts.

        On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the criteria that a tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

Derivative Financial Instruments

        The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), which requires that all derivative instruments be reported on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current operations or in shareholders' equity as other comprehensive income (loss) depending upon whether the derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction.

        The Company, from time to time, enters into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against variability in cash flows resulting from fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate, which is LIBOR, on the Company's debt. These agreements involve the exchange of variable interest rates for fixed interest rates over the life of the swap agreement without an exchange of the notional amount upon which the payments are based. On a quarterly basis, the differential to be received or paid as interest rates change is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. In addition, on a quarterly basis the mark to market valuation is recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss) as a change to shareholders' equity, net of tax. The related amount receivable from or payable to counterparties is included as an asset or liability in the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

F-11


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

        The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123(R)), to account for share-based payments to employees. NMH Investment, LLC ("NMH Investment") adopted an equity-based plan, and issued units of limited liability company interests pursuant to such plan. The units are limited liability company interests and are available for issuance to employees and members of the Board of Directors for incentive purposes. For purposes of determining the compensation expense associated with these grants, management valued the business enterprise using a variety of widely accepted valuation techniques which considered a number of factors such as the Company's financial performance, the values of comparable companies and the lack of marketability of the Company's equity. The Company then used the option pricing method to determine the fair value of these units at the time of grant using valuation assumptions consisting of the expected term in which the units will be realized; a risk-free interest rate equal to the U.S. federal treasury bond rate consistent with the term assumption; expected dividend yield, for which there is none; and expected volatility based on the historical data of equity instruments of comparable companies. The Class B and Class E units vest over a five year service period. The Class C and Class D units vest based on certain performance and/or investment return conditions being met or achieved. The estimated fair value of the units, less an assumed forfeiture rate, will be recognized in expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service/performance periods of the awards.

Reclassifications

        Certain 2007 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to accounting pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), replacing SFAS 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141). SFAS 141R retains the

F-12


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


fundamental requirements of purchase method accounting for acquisitions as set forth previously in SFAS 141. However, this statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of a business in the business combination, thus broadening the scope of SFAS 141 which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained through transfer of consideration. SFAS 141R also establishes principles and requirements for the recognition and measurement of identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. Some of the changes, such as the accounting for contingent consideration and exclusion of transaction costs from acquisition accounting may introduce more volatility into earnings. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. With the adoption of SFAS 141R, the Company's accounting for business combinations will change on a prospective basis beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161), which expands the disclosure requirements in SFAS 133 about an entity's derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 161 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

3. Comprehensive Loss

        SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130), requires classifying items of other comprehensive income (loss) by their nature in a financial statement and displaying the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income (loss) separately from retained earnings and additional paid in capital in the equity section of the balance sheet. The Company's other comprehensive loss includes the unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.

 
  Successor    
 
 
  Predecessor  
 
  Year Ended
September 30
   
 
 
  Period From
June 30 Through
September 30
2006
  Period From
October 1, Through
June 29
2006
 
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Net loss

  $ (7,235 ) $ (2,492 ) $ (3,664 ) $ (31,786 )

Changes in unrealized losses on derivatives

    (5,623 )   (2,244 )   (1,838 )    

Income tax effect

    2,273     907     743      
                   

Comprehensive loss

  $ (10,585 ) $ (3,829 ) $ (4,759 ) $ (31,786 )
                   

F-13


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

4. Acquisitions

2008

        During fiscal 2008, the Company acquired Transitional Services, Inc. ("TSI") for approximately $9.0 million in cash. TSI provides residential services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities in central and southern Indiana.

        The operating results of TSI are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition. The Company accounted for the acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair market value of net tangible assets was allocated to specifically identified intangible assets on a preliminary basis, with the residual being allocated to goodwill. The aggregate purchase price for TSI has been initially allocated as follows:

(in thousands)
   
 

Accounts receivable, net

  $ 943  

Other assets, current and long-term

    21  

Property and equipment

    62  

Identifiable intangible assets

    6,902  

Goodwill

    1,696  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

    (607 )
       

  $ 9,017  
       

        The intangible assets consist of $6.6 million of agency contracts which have a useful life of nine years, $0.2 million of trade name which has a useful life of seven years, and $0.2 million of licenses and permits which have a useful life of ten years.

2007

        During fiscal 2007, the Company acquired six companies engaged in behavioral health and human services. Aggregate consideration for these acquisitions was approximately $24.8 million.

        The operating results of the acquired entities are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the dates of acquisition. The Company accounted for the acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair market value of net tangible assets was allocated to

F-14


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

4. Acquisitions (Continued)


specifically identified intangible assets, with the residual being allocated to goodwill. The aggregate purchase price was allocated as follows:

(in thousands)
   
 

Accounts receivable, net

  $ 4,291  

Other assets, current and long-term

    52  

Property and equipment

    338  

Identifiable intangible assets

    15,235  

Goodwill

    5,679  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

    (811 )
       

  $ 24,784  
       

5. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale

        In fiscal 2008, the Company sold the business it had operated under the name of Integrity Home Health Care ("Integrity") and its business operation in the state of Oklahoma ("Oklahoma Mentor") and, in accordance with SFAS 144, recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $2.1 million, or $1.3 million after taxes. Integrity and Oklahoma Mentor's results of operations and net assets were immaterial both individually and in the aggregate and, as a result, the results of operations and financial position were not reported separately as discontinued operations for the periods presented. All assets and liabilities related to Integrity and Oklahoma Mentor were disposed of as of September 30, 2008.

        Subsequent to September 30, 2008, the Company adopted a plan to sell REM Health, Inc., REM Health of Wisconsin, Inc., and REM Health of Iowa, Inc. (together "REM Health") in fiscal 2009. The assets of REM Health consist of approximately $5.3 million of goodwill and intangible assets as of September 30, 2008 and will be classified as assets held for sale in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 in accordance with SFAS 144.

6. Goodwill

        The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142 which requires goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis, unless significant changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment may have occurred sooner, and written down when impaired. The Company performed its annual test of impairment of goodwill as of July 1, 2008, and based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company determined that no impairment had taken place. The fair value of each reporting unit (the Company's two operating groups: the Cambridge Operating Group and the Redwood Operating Group) exceeded their respective carrying value, and therefore, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary.

F-15


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

6. Goodwill (Continued)

        The changes in goodwill for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

 
  Successor  
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Balance as of October 1

  $ 188,255   $ 184,375  

Goodwill acquired through acquisitions

    1,696     5,679  

Adjustments to goodwill, net

    10,033     (1,799 )

Goodwill written off related to disposal of business units

    (592 )    
           

Balance as of September 30

  $ 199,392   $ 188,255  
           

        The adjustments to goodwill in fiscal 2008 primarily include an adjustment of $12.0 million related to the earnout payment associated with the CareMeridian acquisition. The remaining adjustments are related to the finalization of the purchase price for acquisitions.

        The adjustments to goodwill in fiscal 2007 primarily include an adjustment of $5.5 million related to the earnout payment associated with the CareMeridian acquisition and an adjustment of $4.8 million related to the Company completing the valuation of its real estate assets. The remaining adjustments are related to the finalization of the purchase price for acquisitions.

7. Intangible Assets

        Identifiable intangible assets resulting from the Company's acquisition of certain businesses accounted for under the purchase method, include agency contracts, trade names, noncompete/nonsolicit clauses, licenses and permits and relationships with contracted caregivers. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Certain trade names are classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets due to the length of time the trade names have been in existence and the planned use of the trade names for the foreseeable future.

        Intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30, 2008:

(in thousands)
Description
  Weighted
Average
Remaining Life
  Gross
Carrying
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Intangible
Assets, Net
 

Agency contracts

  14 years   $ 431,989   $ 59,108   $ 372,881  

Non-compete/non-solicit

  3 years     336     150     186  

Relationship with contracted caregivers

  7 years     12,887     3,168     9,719  

Trade names

  8 years     3,351     726     2,625  

Trade names

  Indefinite life     47,700         47,700  

Licenses and permits

  8 years     38,471     8,595     29,876  
                   

      $ 534,734   $ 71,747   $ 462,987  
                   

F-16


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

7. Intangible Assets (Continued)

        Intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30, 2007:

(in thousands)
Description
  Weighted
Average
Remaining Life
  Gross
Carrying
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Intangible
Assets, Net
 

Agency contracts

  15 years   $ 426,508   $ 32,645   $ 393,863  

Non-compete/non-solicit

  4 years     337     44     293  

Relationship with contracted caregivers

  8 years     13,071     1,732     11,339  

Trade names

  8 years     3,361     412     2,949  

Trade names

  Indefinite life     47,700         47,700  

Licenses and permits

  9 years     38,396     4,771     33,625  
                   

      $ 529,373   $ 39,604   $ 489,769  
                   

        Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was $32.3 million, $32.2 million, $7.6 million and $7.3 million, respectively. The weighted average remaining life of amortizable intangible assets is approximately fourteen and fifteen years for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        The estimated remaining amortization expense related to intangible assets with finite lives for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter is as follows:

(in thousands)
Year ending September 30,
   
 

2009

  $ 32,837  

2010

    32,836  

2011

    32,817  

2012

    32,492  

2013

    32,394  

Thereafter

    251,911  
       

  $ 415,287  
       

        During the assessment of long-lived assets that was performed in fiscal 2007, the Company determined that its intellectual property model and certain of its agency contracts were impaired. The Company recorded a $1.1 million impairment charge, which was recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS 144 and is included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

        In fiscal 2007, the Company determined that its intellectual property interest in the Bertell Model, which is a psycho-educational, systemic intervention model acquired in connection with the acquisition of Family Advocacy Services in December 2002, was impaired. Based on management's analysis, the Company determined it will not leverage the experience gained from the Bertell Model and will not expand into other states with similar type schools. As a result, in fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a pretax impairment charge of $0.5 million related to the Bertell Model.

F-17


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

7. Intangible Assets (Continued)

        In certain states, namely North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Texas and Illinois, the Company has management agreements with subsidiaries of Alliance Health and Human Services, Inc. ("Alliance"). See note 8 for disclosures with respect to the Company's relationship with Alliance. During fiscal 2007, the Company terminated its agreements with Alliance in the states of Massachusetts and South Carolina, and the Company currently contracts directly with these state agencies. As a result, the value associated with the Massachusetts and South Carolina Alliance contracts was considered impaired as the relationship with Alliance no longer exists in those states. The Company recorded a pretax impairment charge of $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in fiscal 2007 related to the Massachusetts and South Carolina Alliance agreements.

8. Significant Contractual Arrangements

        The Company has several management agreements with subsidiaries of Alliance, an unrelated party. Alliance is a not-for-profit organization that contracts directly with state government agencies. The Company provides clinical and management services in accordance with the terms of its agreements with Alliance. The Company does not have an ownership interest in, and does not have legal control over, nor does it exert control over Alliance.

        Total revenue derived by the Company from contracts with Alliance was approximately $32.6 million, $39.9 million, $11.2 million and $31.5 million, for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively. The net amount due from Alliance in connection with the services provided by the Company under the contracts at September 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $6.3 million and $6.8 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

9. Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment consists of the following at September 30:

 
  Successor  
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Buildings and land

  $ 107,133   $ 104,306  

Vehicles

    25,803     19,754  

Furniture and fixtures

    14,521     12,360  

Computer hardware and software

    19,069     9,597  

Leasehold improvements

    8,405     5,606  

Office and telecommunication equipment

    6,507     5,187  

Construction in progress

    987     2,788  
           

    182,425     159,598  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

    (38,192 )   (21,626 )
           

Property and equipment, net

  $ 144,233   $ 137,972  
           

F-18


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

9. Property and Equipment (Continued)

        Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was $19.3 million, $18.5 million, $4.1 million and $10.3 million, respectively.

10. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

        Prepaid expenses and other current assets consists of the following at September 30:

 
  Successor  
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Prepaid insurance

  $ 11,320   $ 6,261  

Other

    11,948     11,842  
           

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $ 23,268   $ 18,103  
           

11. Other Accrued Liabilities

        Other accrued liabilities consists of the following at September 30:

 
  Successor  
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Earnout payment(1)

  $ 12,000   $ 5,513  

Accrued swap valuation liability

    9,705     4,082  

Other

    30,732     27,745  
           

Other accrued liabilities

  $ 52,437   $ 37,340  
           

(1)
The earnout payment relates to the Company's CareMeridan acquisition. This amount is calculated in accordance with the related Asset Purchase Agreement and the earnout was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

F-19


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

12. Long-term Debt

        The Company's long-term debt consists of the following:

(in thousands)
  September 30,
2008
  September 30,
2007
 

Senior term B loan, principal and interest due in quarterly installments through June 29, 2013

             
 

—fixed interest rate of 7.32%

  $ 137,844   $ 194,250  
 

—fixed interest rate of 6.89%

    183,930     132,466  
 

—variable interest rate of 5.71% and 7.20% at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively

    5,689     4,096  

Senior revolver, due June 29, 2012; quarterly cash interest payments at a variable interest rate

         

Senior subordinated notes, due July 1, 2014; semi-annual cash interest payments due each January 1 st  and July 1 st  (interest rate of 11.25%)

    180,000     180,000  

Term loan mortgage, principal and interest due in monthly installments through May 20, 2010; variable interest rate (6.50% and 9.25% at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively)

    4,450     5,056  
           

    511,913     515,868  

Less current portion

    3,735     3,747  
           

Long-term debt

  $ 508,178   $ 512,121  
           

        The Company's senior credit facility consists of a $335.0 million seven-year senior secured term B loan facility (the "term B loan"), a $125.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the "senior revolver") and a $20.0 million senior secured synthetic letter of credit facility. Any amounts outstanding under the senior revolver are due June 29, 2012. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had not borrowed under the senior revolver. The $335.0 million term B loan has a term of seven years and amortizes one percent per year, paid quarterly, for the first six years, with the remaining balance due in the seventh year. The senior credit agreement also includes a provision for the prepayment of a portion of the outstanding term loan amounts at any year-end, beginning with the year ended September 30, 2007, equal to an amount ranging from 0-50% of a calculated amount, depending on the Company's leverage ratio, if the Company generates certain levels of cash flow.

        The variable interest rate on the term B loan is equal to LIBOR plus 2.00% or Prime plus 1.00%, at the Company's option. The interest rate on the term B loan outstanding at September 30, 2008 was equal to LIBOR plus 2.00%. The interest rates for any senior revolving credit facility borrowings are equal to either LIBOR plus 2.25% or Prime plus 1.25%, at the Company's option, and subject to reduction depending on the Company's leverage ratio. Cash paid for interest amounted to approximately $45.1 million, $47.7 million, $6.3 million and $49.5 million for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively.

        In connection with the Transactions, the Company issued $180.0 million of 11.25% senior subordinated notes due 2014 (the "senior subordinated notes").

F-20


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

12. Long-term Debt (Continued)

        The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of its outstanding variable rate debt. To reduce the interest rate exposure, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements whereby the Company fixed the interest rate on approximately $221.2 million of its $335.0 million term B loan, effective as of August 31, 2006 and fixed the interest rate on approximately $113.3 million of its remaining $335.0 million term B loan, effective as of August 31, 2007. In total, as of September 30, 2008, the Company fixed the interest rate on approximately $321.8 million of its $327.5 million term B loan.

        The table below provides information about the Company's interest rate swap agreements and remaining variable rate debt related to the term B loan.

 
  Agreement   30-Sept-08   30-Sept-09   30-Sept-10  
(in thousands)
Interest Swap effective date
  Swap
Value
  Rate   Swap
Value
  Rate   Swap
Value
  Rate   Swap
Value
  Rate  

August 31, 2006(1)

  $ 221,200     5.32 % $ 137,844     5.32 % $ 88,988     5.32 %        

August 31, 2007(1)

    113,297     4.89 %   183,930     4.89 %   220,117     4.89 %        

Variable rate debt

                5,689         15,008         320,763      
                                       

Total term B loan

              $ 327,463       $ 324,113       $ 320,763      
                                       

(1)
Interest rates do not include 2.00% spread on LIBOR loans.

        The swap is a derivative and is accounted for under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). The fair value of the swap agreements, representing the estimated amount that the Company would pay to a third party assuming the Company's obligations under the interest rate swap agreements terminated at September 30, 2008, was approximately $9.7 million, or approximately $5.8 million after taxes. The fair value of these agreements was determined based on pricing models and independent formulas using current assumptions.

        Since the Company has the ability to elect different interest rates on the debt at each reset date, the hedging relationship does not qualify for use of the shortcut method under SFAS 133. Therefore, the effectiveness of the hedge relationships is assessed on a quarterly basis during the term of the hedge by comparing whether the critical terms of the hedge continue to match the terms of the debt. Under this approach, the Company exactly matches the terms of the interest rate swap to the terms of the underlying debt and, therefore, assumes 100% hedge effectiveness. The entire change in fair market value is recorded in shareholders' equity, net of tax, on the consolidated balance sheets as other comprehensive loss.

        The senior credit agreement and the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contain both affirmative and negative financial and non-financial covenants, including limitations on the Company's ability to incur additional debt, sell material assets, retire, redeem or otherwise reacquire capital stock, acquire the capital stock or assets of another business, pay dividends, and require the Company to meet or exceed certain financial ratios. At September 30, 2008, management of the Company believes that the Company is in compliance with all covenants.

        The priority with regard to the right of payment on the Company's debt is such that the senior credit facilities and the term loan mortgage have priority over all of the Company's long-term debt.

F-21


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

12. Long-term Debt (Continued)


The senior credit facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, the term loan mortgage facility is secured by certain buildings and land of the Company and the senior subordinated notes are guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries, except for the captive insurance subsidiary. The results and operations of the captive insurance subsidiary are not material to the Company's consolidated results.

        The consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2008 and 2007 include deferred financing costs of approximately $22.8 million and $22.2 million, respectively, related to the 2006 refinancing: $3.2 million in current assets (under Prepaid expenses and other current assets) and $19.5 million at September 30, 2008 and $19.0 million at September 30, 2007 in other long-term assets (under Other assets). The Company incurred amortization expense of $3.4 million, $3.2 million, $0.7 million and $8.6 million for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively. Amortization of these deferred financing costs is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

        Annual maturities of the Company's long-term debt for the years ending September 30 are as follows.

        Amounts due at any year end may increase as a result of the provision in the new senior credit agreement that requires a prepayment of a portion of the outstanding term loan amounts if the Company generates certain levels of cash flow.

(in thousands)
   
 

2009

  $ 3,735  

2010

    7,415  

2011

    3,350  

2012

    3,350  

2013

    314,063  

Thereafter

    180,000  
       

Total

  $ 511,913  
       

        On July 5, 2007, NMH Holdings, Inc. ("NMH Holdings"), the Company's indirect parent company, issued $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior floating rate toggle notes due 2014 (the "NMH Holdings notes"). The NMH Holdings notes are unsecured and are not guaranteed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and thus, are not recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        Cash interest on the NMH Holdings notes accrues at a rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to LIBOR plus 6.375%, and PIK Interest (defined below) accrues at the cash interest rate plus 0.75%. NMH Holdings has paid all of the interest payments to date on these notes entirely in PIK Interest. For any interest payment through June 15, 2012, NMH Holdings may elect to pay interest on the NMH Holdings notes (a) entirely in cash, (b) entirely by increasing the principal amount of the NMH Holdings notes or issuing new notes ("PIK Interest") or (c) 50% in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. After June 15, 2012, NMH Holdings will be required to pay all interest on the NMH Holdings notes in cash. NMH Holdings currently expects to elect to pay entirely PIK Interest through June 15, 2012.

F-22


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

12. Long-term Debt (Continued)

        NMH Holdings used the proceeds of approximately $172.4 million, which reflects the NMH Holdings notes, net of original issue discount of $2.625 million, from the offering to (i) pay an approximately $170.3 million dividend to its parent, NMH Investment, which was used by NMH Investment to pay a return of capital with respect to its preferred units and (ii) pay fees and expenses related to the offering.

13. Capital Leases

        The Company leases certain facilities and vehicles under various non-cancellable capital leases that expire at various dates through fiscal 2025. Assets acquired under capital leases with an original cost of $2.5 million and $0.8 million and related accumulated amortization of $0.5 million and $0.4 million are included in property and equipment for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

        The following is a schedule of the future minimum lease payments under the capital leases together with the present value of net minimum lease payments at September 30, 2008:

(in thousands)
   
 

2009

  $ 201  

2010

    131  

2011

    56  

2012

    61  

2013

    67  

Thereafter

    1,491  
       

Total minimum lease payments

  $ 2,007  
       

        Interest expense on capital leases during the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was $0.1 million, $29 thousand , $10 thousand and $29 thousand, respectively.

14. Shareholders' Equity

Common Stock

        As of September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company has 1,000 shares of $0.01 par value common stock authorized and 100 shares issued and outstanding. All of the outstanding shares are held by NMH Investment.

Dividends

        The holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

F-23


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

14. Shareholders' Equity (Continued)

Voting

        The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share.

15. Employee Savings and Retirement Plans

        The Company has a multi-company plan (the "Plan") which covers all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. Under the Plan, employees may contribute a portion of their earnings, which are invested in mutual funds of their choice. After January 1, the Company makes a matching contribution for the previous calendar year on behalf of all participants employed on the last day of the year. This matching contribution vests immediately. In addition, there is a profit sharing feature of the Plan, whereby, at the discretion of management, an allocation may be made to all of the eligible employees in one or more of its subsidiaries. Profit sharing contributions vest ratably over three years with forfeitures available to cover plan costs and employer matches in future years. The Company made contributions of approximately $4.3 million, $3.8 million, $0.4 million and $4.1 million for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively.

        The Company has two deferred compensation plans: (1) the National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement for certain highly compensated employees in which the Company contributes to the executive's account a percentage of the executive's base compensation. This contribution is made at the end of the year for service rendered during the year. The Company contributed $0.3 million, $0.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively. The unfunded accrued liability is $1.4 million and $1.0 million as of September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets (2) the National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferral Plan, available to highly compensated employees, is a plan in which participants contribute a percentage of salary and/or bonus earned during the year. Employees contributed $1.0 million, $0.8 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million to this plan for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively. The accrued liability related to this plan is $2.2 million and $1.8 million as of September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. In connection with the National Mentor Holdings, LLC Executive Deferral Plan, the Company purchased Company Owned Life Insurance ("COLI") policies on certain plan participants. The cash surrender value of the COLI policies is designed to provide a source for funding the accrued liability. As of both September 30, 2008 and 2007, the cash surrender value of the COLI policies is $1.8 million and is included in other assets on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

F-24


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

16. Related Party Transactions

Management Agreements

Predecessor

        In March 2001, the Company entered into a management services agreement with Madison Dearborn Partners ("MDP"), the majority stockholder of the predecessor Company, under which MDP performed certain management, financing and strategic functions as directed by the Company's Board of Directors for an annual fee of $250 thousand plus out-of-pocket expenses. During the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, the Company incurred $0.2 million of management fees and expenses under such agreement.

Successor

        On June 29, 2006, the Company entered into a management agreement with Vestar relating to certain advisory and consulting services for an annual fee equal to the greater of (i) $850 thousand or (ii) an amount equal to 1.0% of the Company's consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and management fees for each fiscal year determined as set forth in the new senior credit facilities. As part of the management agreement, the Company also paid Vestar a transaction fee of approximately $7.5 million for services rendered in connection with the consummation of the Transactions. This transaction fee was allocated between goodwill and deferred financing costs in the September 30, 2006 consolidated balance sheet. As part of the management agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify Vestar and its affiliates from and against all losses, claims, damages and liabilities arising out of the performance by Vestar of its services pursuant to the management agreement. The management agreement will terminate upon such time that Vestar and its partners and their respective affiliates hold, directly or indirectly in the aggregate, less than 20% of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of the Company. During the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006, the Company incurred $1.3 million, $0.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of management fees and expenses under such agreement.

Office Lease Agreements

        The Company leases several offices and homes from its employees, or from relatives of employees, primarily in the states of Minnesota, California and Nevada, which have various expiration dates extending out as far as May 2016. The Company incurred approximately $2.4 million, $2.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million in rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, respectively, related to these leases. The leases in California and Nevada are a result of the CareMeridian acquisition on May 31, 2006.

17. Operating Leases

        The Company leases office and client residential facilities, vehicles and certain office equipment in several locations under operating lease arrangements, which expire at various dates through 2025. In addition to base rents presented below, the majority of the leases require payments for additional expenses such as taxes, maintenance and utilities. Certain of the leases contain renewal options at the

F-25


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

17. Operating Leases (Continued)


Company's option and some have escalation clauses which are recognized as rent expense on a straight line basis. Total rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was $40.3 million, $36.8 million, $8.5 million and $22.8 million, respectively.

        Future minimum lease payments for noncancelable operating leases for the years ending September 30 are as follows:

(in thousands)
   

2009

  $31,366

2010

  24,799

2011

  20,336

2012

  14,311

2013

  10,752

Thereafter

  18,379
     

  $119,943
     

18. Accruals for Self-Insurance and Other Commitments and Contingencies

        The Company maintains professional and general liability, workers' compensation, automobile liability and health insurance policies that include self-insured retentions. The Company intends to maintain such coverage in the future and is of the opinion that its insurance coverage is adequate to cover potential losses on asserted claims. Professional and general liability has a self-insured retention of $1.0 million per claim and $2.0 million in the aggregate. In connection with the Merger, subject to the same retentions, the Company purchased additional insurance for certain claims relating to pre- Merger periods. For workers' compensation, the Company has a $350 thousand per claim retention with statutory limits. Automobile liability has a $100 thousand per claim retention, with additional insurance coverage above the retention. The Company purchases specific stop loss insurance as protection against extraordinary claims liability for health insurance claims. Stop loss insurance covers claims that exceed $300 thousand on a per member basis.

        Beginning November 1, 2005, the Company's self-insured portion of professional and general liability claims was transferred into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary captive insurance company. The accounts of the captive insurance company are fully consolidated with those of the other operations of the Company in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

        The Company issued approximately $23.0 million in standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2008 related to the Company's workers' compensation insurance coverage. These letters of credit are secured by the $20.0 million synthetic letter of credit facility. The availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility was reduced by $3.0 million as letters of credit in excess of $20.0 million under our synthetic letters of credit facility were outstanding.

F-26


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

18. Accruals for Self-Insurance and Other Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        The Company is in the human services business and, therefore, has been and reasonably expects it will continue to be subject to claims alleging that the Company, its independently contracted host-home caregivers (called "Mentors"), or its employees failed to provide proper care for a client, as well as claims by the Company's clients, Mentors, employees or community members against the Company for negligence or intentional misconduct. Included in the Company's recent claims are claims alleging personal injury, assault, battery, abuse, wrongful death and other charges. Regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging that the Company's programs, employees or agents violate statutes and regulations and seek to impose monetary penalties on the Company. The Company could be required to incur significant costs to respond to regulatory investigations or defend against civil lawsuits and, if the Company does not prevail, the Company could be required to pay substantial amounts of money in damages, settlement amounts or penalties arising from these legal proceedings.

        The Company accrues for costs related to contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. While the Company believes the provision for contingencies is adequate, the outcome of the legal and other such proceedings is difficult to predict and the Company may settle claims or be subject to judgments for amounts that differ from the Company's estimates.

19. Income Taxes

        The benefit for income taxes consists of the following:

 
  Successor   Predecessor  
(in thousands)
  Year Ended
September
2008
  Year Ended
September 30
2007
  Period From
June 30 Through
September 30
2006
  Period From
October 1 Through
June 29
2006
 

Current:

                         
 

Federal

  $ 690   $ 2,297   $ (7 ) $ (7,086 )
 

State

    1,278     2,389     211     840  
                   

Total current taxes payable (benefit)

    1,968     4,686     204     (6,246 )

Net deferred tax benefit

    (2,145 )   (5,169 )   (2,426 )   (5,101 )
                   

Income tax benefit

  $ (177 ) $ (483 ) $ (2,222 ) $ (11,347 )
                   

        The Company (paid) received income taxes during the year ended September 30, 2008, the year ended September 30, 2007, the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 of $(0.1) million, $7.4 million, $1.9 million and $(3.3) million, respectively. The Company has received approximately $10.4 million; $1.5 million by September 30, 2006 and $8.9 million by September 30, 2007, from the federal government due to a carryback of the net operating loss for the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006.

        Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income

F-27


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

19. Income Taxes (Continued)


tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30 are as follows:

 
  Successor  
 
  September 30  
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Gross deferred tax assets:

             
 

Deferred compensation

  $ 1,119   $ 971  
 

Interest rate swap agreements

    3,924     1,651  
 

Accrued workers' compensation

    6,106     5,928  
 

Net operating loss carryforwards

    5,592     4,755  
 

Allowance for bad debts

    1,816     1,829  
 

Capital loss carryforward

    96     96  
 

Alternative minimum tax credit

    463      
 

Other

    1,695     1,212  
           

    20,811     16,442  
 

Valuation reserve

    (5,192 )   (4,169 )
           

Deferred tax assets

    15,619     12,273  

Deferred tax liabilities:

             
 

Depreciation

    (13,331 )   (11,274 )
 

Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets

    (110,567 )   (116,658 )
 

Other accrued liabilities

    (3,469 )   (3,036 )
           

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $ (111,748 ) $ (118,695 )
           

        SFAS 109 requires a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets recorded if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that a $5.2 million and $4.2 million valuation allowance at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, is necessary to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. The valuation allowance primarily relates to certain state net operating loss carryforwards. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for federal purposes, which expire from 2026 through 2027, and $105.5 million and $85.1 million, respectively, for state income tax purposes, which expire from 2008 through 2027.

F-28


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

19. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The following is a reconciliation between the statutory and effective income tax rates:

 
  Successor   Predecessor  
(in thousands)
  Year Ended
September 30
2008
  Year Ended
September 30
2007
  Period From
June 30 Through
September 30
2006
  Period From
October 1 Through
June 29
2006
 

Federal income tax at statutory rate

    35.0 %   35.0 %   35.0 %   35.0 %

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

    (6.7 )   (7.6 )   2.7     (0.1 )

Nondeductible comp

    (9.5 )   (10.0 )       (.5 )

Other nondeductible expenses

    (3.1 )   (4.7 )   (1.0 )   (7.8 )

Credits

    (0.6 )            

Tax benefit of discontinued operations

    (9.6 )            

Other

    (2.6 )   3.5     1.1     (0.3 )
                   

Effective tax rate

    2.9 %   16.2 %   37.8 %   26.3 %
                   

        In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the criteria that a tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes . FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 was effective for the Company as of October 1, 2007.

        As of October 1, 2007, the Company had approximately $5.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits and the cumulative effect on retained earnings was $0.3 million. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

(in thousands)
   
 

Balance at October 1, 2007

  $ 5,054  

Increases/(decreases) for tax positions related to prior years

    310  
       

Balance at September 30, 2008

  $ 5,364  
       

        The amount that would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, was $0.3 million. The Company accrued interest and penalties $0.3 million for the period ended September 30, 2008 and recognized $0.9 million in the statement of financial position. The Company does not expect any significant changes to unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

        The Company files a federal consolidated return and files various state income tax returns and, generally, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by the taxing authorities for years prior to September 30, 2003. The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax. The Company believes that we have appropriate support

F-29


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

19. Income Taxes (Continued)

for the income tax positions taken and to be taken on the Company's income tax returns and that the Company's accruals for income tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of the tax laws as applied to the facts of each matter.

20. Segment Information

        The Company provides home and community-based human services to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, at-risk children and youth with emotional, behavioral or medically complex needs and their families and persons with an acquired brain injury. The Company operates its business in two operating groups: the Cambridge Operating Group and the Redwood Operating Group. The Company's operating groups are aggregated to represent one reportable segment, human services, under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131). Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the operating results of the Company's one reportable segment.

        The aggregate of the Company's two groups meets the definition of one reportable segment in SFAS 131 as each group engages in business activities that earn similar type revenues and incur similar type expenses. In addition, the operating results are regularly reviewed by management, including the Company's chief operating decision-maker, to assess performance and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the respective groups. Discrete financial information is available in the form of detailed statements of operations for each group. The aggregation of the two operating groups is consistent with the objective and basic principles of SFAS 131 in that it provides the users of the financial statements with the same information that management uses to internally evaluate and manage the business. Both of the Company's operating groups provide the same types of services discussed above to similar customer groups, principally individuals. Both operating groups have similar economic characteristics, such as similar long-term gross margins. In addition, both groups follow the same operating procedures and methods in managing the operations, as services are provided in a similar manner. Both groups operate in a similar regulatory environment, as both groups have common objectives and regulatory and supervisory responsibilities (e.g., licensing, certification, program standards and regulatory requirements).

        The Company's three service lines do not represent operating segments under SFAS 131 as management does not internally evaluate the operating performance or review the results of the service lines to assess performance or make decisions about allocating resources. Discrete financial information is not available by service line at the level necessary for management to assess performance or make resource allocation decisions.

F-30


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

20. Segment Information (Continued)

        The following table sets forth information about revenue by service line as of the dates specified:

Service Line Revenues

 
  Successor   Predecessor  
 
  Year Ended September 30,   Period From
June 30 Through
September 30
2006
  Period From
October 1 Through
June 29
2006
 
(in thousands)
  2008   2007  

Intellectual and/or developmental disabilities

  $ 622,527   $ 590,152   $ 142,087   $ 405,090  

At-risk youth and their families

    220,780     207,695     40,814     113,748  

Acquired brain injury

    98,087     88,484     21,216     41,852  

Other

    21,535     23,768     4,764     19,666  
                   

Consolidated total

  $ 962,929   $ 910,099   $ 208,881   $ 580,356  
                   

21. Stock-Based Compensation

        Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statements of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.

        Prior to the Transactions, the predecessor Company had a stock option plan that provided for the grant to directors, officers and key employees of options to purchase shares of common stock. Options typically had a vesting term of four years and expired ten years from date of grant. The total number of shares of common stock as to which options were granted could not exceed 1,292,952 shares of common stock. As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), for the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, the predecessor Company recorded $0.5 million of stock-based compensation expense included in general and administrative expense in the statements of operations.

        At the time of the Merger, all unvested stock options became vested in accordance with the change in control provision of the original stock option agreements. According to the Merger Agreement, all stock options outstanding at the time of the Merger were cancelled, and the holders of vested options received a cash payment in the amount equal to the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price per share. The Company expensed $26.9 million in the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006, which is the difference between the fair value of the underlying stock and the related stock option exercise price

        The fair value of options granted during the period from October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006 was calculated using the following assumptions: an expected life of 6.25 years, a risk-free interest rate of 4.40% and expected volatility of 64.9%. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $14.38.

F-31


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

21. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        In connection with the Transactions, NMH Investment adopted a new equity-based plan and issued units of limited liability company interests consisting of Class B Units, Class C Units, Class D Units and Class E Units. The units are limited liability company interests and are available for issuance to the Company's employees and members of the Board of Directors for incentive purposes. As of September 30, 2008, there were 192,500 Class B Units, 202,000 Class C Units, 388,881 Class D Units and 6,375 Class E Units authorized for issuance under the plan.

        The Class B Units vest over 61 months. Assuming continued employment of the employee with the Company, 40 percent vest at the end of 37 months from the grant date, and the remaining 60 percent vest monthly over the remainder of the term. Assuming continued employment, the Class C Units and Class D Units vest after three years, subject to certain performance conditions and/or investment return conditions being met or achieved in each of the first three years. The performance conditions relate to the Company achieving certain financial targets for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and the investment return conditions relate to Vestar receiving a specified multiple on its investment upon a liquidation event.

        If an employee holder's employment is terminated, NMH Investment may repurchase the holder's units. If the termination occurs within 12 months after the relevant measurement date, all of the B units will be repurchased at the initial purchase price, or cost. If the termination occurs during the following four-year period, the proportion of the B units that may be purchased at fair market value will be determined depending on the circumstances of the holder's departure and the date of termination. From month 13 to month 60, if the holder is terminated without cause, or resigns for good reason, he or she is entitled to receive a higher proportion of the purchase price at fair market value than if he or she resigns voluntarily. This proportion increases ratably each month. For the C and D units, the holder is entitled to receive fair market value if he or she is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason or, after the third anniversary of the relevant measurement date, upon termination for any reason except for cause. Before the third anniversary, all the C and D units are callable at cost if the holder resigns without good reason. In the event of a termination for cause at any time, all of the units would be callable at cost. The Class E Units vest over time given continued service of the director as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. After the death of the Company's director Jeffry Timmons in April 2008, there are currently no Class E units outstanding.

        For purposes of determining the compensation expense associated with these grants, management valued the business enterprise using a variety of widely accepted valuation techniques which considered a number of factors such as the financial performance of the Company, the values of comparable companies and the lack of marketability of the Company's equity. The Company then used the option pricing method to determine the fair value of the units granted in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008.

        The fair value of the units granted during fiscal 2007 was calculated using the following assumptions: a term of five years, which is based on the expected term in which the units will be realized; a risk-free interest rate of 4.61%, which is the five-year U.S. federal treasury bond rate consistent with the term assumption; and expected volatility of 40%, which is based on the historical data of equity instruments of comparable companies.

F-32


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

21. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        The fair value of the units granted during fiscal 2008 was calculated using the following assumptions: a term of 3.5 years, which is based on the expected term in which the units will be realized; a risk-free interest rate of 2.81%, which is the 3.5 year U.S. federal treasury bond rate consistent with the term assumption; and expected volatility of 37%, which is based on the historical data of equity instruments of comparable companies.

        The estimated fair value of the units, less an assumed forfeiture rate of 7.1%, will be recognized in expense in the Company's financial statements on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards. For Class B and E Units, the requisite service period is five years, and for Class C and D Units, the requisite service period is three years. The assumed forfeiture rate is based on an average of the Company's historical forfeiture rates. The historical trend of forfeitures is deemed reasonable to use in determining expected forfeitures.

        In accordance with SFAS 123(R), the Company recorded $2.2 million and $0.8 million of stock-based compensation expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The summary of activity under the plan is presented below:

 
  Year Ended September 30, 2008   Year Ended September 30, 2007  
(in thousands)
  Units
Outstanding
  Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
  Units
Outstanding
  Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested balance at beginning of period

    564,674   $ 7.75       $  

Granted

    223,404     4.14     566,195     7.75  

Forfeited

    (30,107 )   8.29     (1,521 )   7.73  

Vested

                 
                   

Nonvested balance at end of period

    757,971   $ 6.66     564,674   $ 7.75  
                       

        As of September 30, 2008, there was $1.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the units. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years. For purposes of this table above, no units were vested as of September 30, 2008 such that value was realized, as NMH Investment could repurchase at cost the units of any employee who terminated his or her employment voluntarily up to that date. However, in most cases, if an employee is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, he or she is entitled to receive fair market value for a portion of his or her units, calculated in accordance with the applicable Management Unit Subscription Agreement.

F-33


Table of Contents


National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

September 30, 2008

22. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

        The following table summarizes information about the allowances for doubtful accounts and sales allowances for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the periods June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 through June 29, 2006:

(in thousands)
  Balance at
Beginning
of Period
  Provision   Write-Offs   Balance
at End
of Period
 

Successor

                         

Year Ended September 30, 2008

  $ 5,091   $ 9,526   $ (9,560 ) $ 5,057  

Year Ended September 30, 2007

    1,208     8,435     (4,552 )   5,091  

Period from June 30 through September 30, 2006

        1,412     (204 )   1,208  

Predecessor

                         

Period from October 1 through June 29, 2006

  $ 2,800   $ 3,641   $ (3,808 ) $ 2,633  

23. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

        The following table presents consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters in the period beginning October 1, 2006 and ending September 30, 2008. This information is derived from the Company's unaudited financial statements, which in the opinion of management contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial data. Operating results for these periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future periods.

 
  For the quarters ended  
 
  December 31,
2006
  March 31,
2007
  June 30,
2007
  September 30,
2007
  December 31,
2007
  March 31,
2008
  June 30,
2008
  September 30,
2008
 
 
  (in thousands, except per share data)
 

Net revenues

  $ 220,313   $ 227,223   $ 229,086   $ 233,476   $ 237,399   $ 240,207   $ 242,897   $ 242,426  

Gross profit

    54,224     56,504     55,910     54,522     56,940     57,999     59,345     55,987  

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax

    145     288     (45 )   (2,880 )   (319 )   (1,339 )   (1,148 )   (3,100 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                            (846 )   (483 )
                                   

Net income (loss)

  $ 145   $ 288   $ (45 ) $ (2,880 ) $ (319 ) $ (1,339 ) $ (1,994 ) $ (3,583 )
                                   

24. Subsequent Events

        In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company drew $40.0 million of funds from the senior secured revolving credit facility. A portion of the funds were used for the earn-out payment related to the CareMeridian acquisition which was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes and potential acquisitions.

F-34




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 4.4

SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

        Supplemental Indenture (this " Supplemental Indenture "), dated as of October 1, 2008, among National Mentor Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the " Issuer "), CareMeridian, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the " Guaranteeing Subsidiary ") and a subsidiary of the Issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the " Trustee ").

W I T N E S S E T H

        WHEREAS, each of the Issuer and the Guarantors (as defined in the Indenture referred to below) has heretofore executed and delivered to the Trustee an indenture (the " Indenture "), dated as of June 29, 2006, providing for the issuance of an unlimited aggregate principal amount of 11 1 / 4 % Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (the " Notes ");

        WHEREAS, the Indenture provides that under certain circumstances the Guaranteeing Subsidiary shall execute and deliver to the Trustee a supplemental indenture pursuant to which the Guaranteeing Subsidiary shall unconditionally guarantee all of the Issuer's Obligations under the Notes and the Indenture on the terms and conditions set forth herein and under the Indenture (the " Guarantee "); and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.01 of the Indenture, the Trustee is authorized to execute and deliver this Supplemental Indenture.

        NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties mutually covenant and agree for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders of the Notes as follows:

        (1)    Capitalized Terms.     Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture.

        (2)    Agreement to be Bound.     The Guarantor hereby becomes a party to the Indenture as a Guarantor and as such will have all of the rights and be subject to all of the obligations and agreements of a Guarantor under the Indenture. The Guarantor agrees to be bound by all of the provisions of the Indenture applicable to a Guarantor and to perform all of the obligations and agreements of a Guarantor under the Indenture.

        (3)    Guarantee .    The Guarantor agrees, on a joint and several basis with all the existing and future Guarantors, to fully, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee to each Holder of the Notes and the Trustee the Guarantor obligations pursuant to Article 11 and Article 12 of the Indenture, including without limitation, the full and prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes, on a senior subordinated basis as provided in the Indenture.

        (4)    Notices .    All notices and other communications to the Guarantor shall be given as provided in the Indenture.

        (5)    Parties .    Nothing expressed or mentioned herein is intended or shall be construed to give any Person, firm or corporation, other than the Holders and the Trustee, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or in respect of this Supplemental Indenture or the Indenture or any provision herein or therein contained.

        (6)    Governing Law.     THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

        (7)    Ratification of Indenture; Supplemental Indentures Part of Indenture.     Except as expressly amended hereby, the Indenture is in all respects ratified and confirmed and all the terms, conditions and provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. This Supplemental Indenture shall form a part of the Indenture for all purposes, and every Holder of Notes heretofore or hereafter authenticated and delivered shall be bound hereby. The Trustee makes no representation or warranty as to the validity or sufficiency of this Supplemental Indenture.


        (8)    Counterparts.     The parties hereto may sign one or more copies of this Supplemental Indenture in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

        (9)    Headings.     The headings of in this Supplemental Indenture are for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to alter or affect the meaning or interpretation of any provisions hereof.

        (10)  Trust Indenture Act Controls.     If and to the extent that any provision of this Indenture limits, qualifies or conflicts with another provision which is required to be included in this Supplemental Indenture by the TIA, the provision required by the TIA shall control. Each Guarantor in addition to performing its obligations under its Guarantee shall perform such other obligations as may be imposed upon it with respect to this Indenture under the TIA.

[Signature page follows]

2


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Indenture to be duly executed, all as of the date first above written.

    NATIONAL MENTOR HOLDINGS, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DENIS M. HOLLER

        Name:   Denis M. Holler
        Title:   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

 

CAREMERIDIAN, LLC

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DENIS M. HOLLER

        Name:   Denis M. Holler
        Title:   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee

 

 

By:

 

/s/ RICHARD PROKOSCH

        Name:   Richard Prokosch
        Title:   Vice President

3




QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 10.13


DIRECTOR UNIT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

(Preferred Units, Class A Units and Class E Units)

        THIS DIRECTOR UNIT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT (this " Agreement ") is made as of [            ] , 2008, between NMH Investment, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the " Company ") and [            ] (the " Director ").

        WHEREAS, on the terms and subject to the conditions hereof, Director desires to subscribe for and the Company desires to issue and sell to Director, the Company's Participating Preferred Units (the " Preferred Units "), Class A Common Units (the " Class A Units ") and Class E Common Units (the " Class E Units ", and together with the Preferred Units and the Class A Units, the " Units "), in each case in the amounts set forth on Schedule I , as hereinafter set forth; and

        WHEREAS, this Agreement is one of several agreements entered into or being entered into by the Company with certain persons who are or will be key employees and/or directors of the Company or one or more of its subsidiaries as part of an equity purchase plan designed to comply with Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act (as defined below);

        NOW, THEREFORE, in order to implement the foregoing and in consideration of the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.     Definitions.     

        1.1     Agreement .    The term "Agreement" shall have the meaning set forth in the preface.

        1.2     Applicable Percentage .    The term "Applicable Percentage" shall mean, with respect to Director's Class E Units, the percentage set forth in the applicable table under the heading "Applicable Percentage," as more specifically determined in accordance with the schedule set forth as Exhibit 1.2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

        1.3     Board .    The "Board" shall mean the Company's Management Committee.

        1.4     Cause .    The term "Cause" shall mean a termination of Director's service as a member of the Board due to (i) the commission by Director of an act of fraud or embezzlement, (ii) the indictment or conviction of Director for (x) a felony or (y) a crime involving moral turpitude or a plea by Director of guilty or nolo contendere involving such a crime (to the extent it gives rise to an adverse effect on the business or reputation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries), (iii) the willful misconduct by Director in the performance of Director's duties, including any willful misrepresentation or willful concealment by Director on any report submitted to the Company (or any of its securityholders or subsidiaries) which is not of a de minimis nature, (iv) the willful failure of Director to render services to the Company or any of its subsidiaries in accordance with Director's service which failure amounts to a material neglect of Director's duties to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (v) the material breach by Director of any of the provisions of any agreement between Director, on the one hand, and the Company or a securityholder or an affiliate of the Company, on the other hand.

        1.5     Closing .    The term "Closing" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2.

        1.6     Closing Date .    The term "Closing Date" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2.

        1.7     Company .    The term "Company" shall have the meaning set forth in the preface.

        1.8     Cost .    The term "Cost" shall mean the price per Unit paid by Director as proportionately adjusted for all subsequent distributions of Units and other recapitalizations and less the amount of any distributions made with respect to the Units pursuant to Section 4.4 of the LLC Agreement (other than tax distributions pursuant to Section 4.4(j) of the LLC Agreement).

1


        1.9     Disability .    The term "Disability" of Director shall mean the inability of Director to perform the essential functions of Director's job, with or without reasonable accommodation, by reason of a physical or mental infirmity, for a continuous period of six months. The period of six months shall be deemed continuous unless Director returns to work for at least 30 consecutive business days during such period and performs during such period at the level and competence that existed prior to the beginning of the six-month period. The date of such Disability shall be on the first day of such six-month period.

        1.10     Director .    The term "Director" shall have the meaning set forth in the preface.

        1.11     Director Group .    The term "Director Group" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.1(a).

        1.12     Fair Market Value .    The term "Fair Market Value" used in connection with the value of Units shall mean the average of the closing prices of the sales of the Company's Units on all securities exchanges on which the Units may at the time be listed, or, if there have been no sales on any such exchange on any day, the average of the highest bid and lowest asked prices on all such exchanges at the end of such day or, if on any day the Units are not so listed, the average of the representative bid and asked prices quoted in the NASDAQ System as of 4:00 P.M., New York time, or, if on any day the Units are not quoted in the NASDAQ System, the average of the highest bid and lowest asked prices on such day in the domestic over-the-counter market as reported by the National Quotation Bureau Incorporated or any similar successor organization, in each such case averaged over a period of 21 days consisting of the day as of which the Fair Market Value is being determined and the 20 consecutive business days prior to such day. If at any time the Units are not listed on any securities exchange or quoted in the NASDAQ System or the over-the-counter market, the Fair Market Value shall be the fair value of the Units determined in good faith by the Board using its reasonable business judgment (valuing the Company and its subsidiaries as a going concern; disregarding any discount for minority interest or marketability of the Units, whether due to transfer restrictions or the lack of a public market for the Units; taking into account the Preferred Priority Return (as defined in the LLC Agreement); without taking into account the effect of any contemporaneous repurchase of Units at less than Fair Market Value under Section 4) after consultation with an independent appraiser, accountant or investment banking firm (the " Valuation Expert "); provided that (i) the Board shall only be obligated to consult a Valuation Expert once annually absent special circumstances (as determined in good faith by the Board) and (ii) if Director disagrees in good faith with the Board's determination and such dispute involves an amount in excess of $250,000, Director shall notify the Company in writing of such disagreement within ten (10) business days of receipt of the Board's determination of the fair market value of such Units, in which event a second Valuation Expert (the " Arbiter ") selected by mutual agreement of Director and the Board shall make a determination of the fair market value thereof (valuing the Company and its subsidiaries as set forth above) solely by (i) reviewing a single written presentation timely made by each of the Company and Director setting forth their respective resolutions of the dispute and the bases therefor and (ii) accepting either Director's or the Company's proposed resolution of the dispute. For the avoidance of doubt, the determination of Fair Market Value of any Unit shall be based on the amounts distributable in respect of such Unit under the terms of the LLC Agreement, including any adjustments necessary to reflect the portion of any tax distributions that were previously made in respect of such Unit but not charged against other distributions in respect of such Unit.

        Within five (5) business days after the Company's receipt of Director's written notice of disagreement, the Company shall make available to Director all data (including reports of employees and outside advisors) relied upon by the Board in making its determination. Director's and the Company's written presentations must be submitted to the Arbiter within 30 days of the Arbiter's engagement, written notice of which shall be delivered by the Company to Director. The Arbiter shall notify Director and the Company of its decision within 40 days of its engagement. If Director's

2



proposed resolution is accepted, the Company also shall pay all of Director's reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses (including reasonable fees and expenses of counsel and one Valuation Expert) incurred in connection with the arbitration. Each of the Company and Director agrees to execute, if requested by the Arbiter, a reasonable engagement letter with the Arbiter.

        1.13     Financing Default .    The term "Financing Default" shall mean an event which would constitute (or with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute) an event of default under any of the following as they may be amended from time to time: (i) the Credit Agreement dated as of June 29, 2006 among National Mentor Holdings, Inc. (" NMH "), NMH Holdings, LLC, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as sole administrative agent for such lenders, as amended, and the Indenture, dated as June 29, 2006, among NMH, the Guarantors (as defined in the Indenture), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, as amended, and the Senior Subordinated Notes issued by NMH pursuant to the Indenture (collectively, the " Financing Agreements "), and any extensions, renewals, refinancings or refundings thereof in whole or in part; (ii) any other agreement under which an amount of indebtedness of the Company or any of its subsidiaries in excess of $5,000,000 is outstanding as of the time of the aforementioned event, and any extensions, renewals, refinancings or refundings thereof in whole or in part; (iii) restrictive financial covenants contained in the LLC Agreement of the Company or NMH's organizational documents; (iv) any amendment of, supplement to or other modification of any of the instruments referred to in clauses (i) through (iii) above; and (v) any of the securities issued pursuant to or whose terms are governed by the terms of any of the agreements set forth in clauses (i) through (iv) above, and any extensions, renewals, refinancings or refundings thereof in whole or in part.

        1.14     LLC Agreement .    The term "LLC Agreement" means the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2008, by and among the Company, Vestar and the other Members of the Company a party thereto, as amended from time to time in accordance with the provisions thereof.

        1.15     Permitted Transferee .    The term "Permitted Transferee" means any transferee of Units pursuant to clauses (f) or (g) of the definition of "Exempt Employee Transfer" as defined in the Securityholders Agreement.

        1.16     Person .    The term "Person" shall mean any individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, trust, joint stock company, business trust, unincorporated association, joint venture, governmental authority or other entity of any nature whatsoever.

        1.17     Public Offering .    The term "Public Offering" shall have the meaning set forth in the Securityholders Agreement.

        1.18     Preferred Units .    The term "Preferred Units" shall have the meaning set forth in the recitals.

        1.19     Purchase Price .    The term "Purchase Price" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.

        1.20     Sale of the Company .    The term "Sale of the Company" shall have the meaning set forth in the Securityholders Agreement, except that transactions with a Person or Persons that are a wholly owned Subsidiary (as defined in the Securityholders Agreement) of Vestar and/or Vestar/NMH Investors, LLC or NMH Investment, LLC shall be excluded.

        1.21     Securities Act .    The term "Securities Act" shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as the same may be amended from time to time.

        1.22     Securityholders Agreement .    The term "Securityholders Agreement" shall mean the Securityholders Agreement dated as of June 29, 2006 among Vestar, the Management Investors and the Company, as it may be amended or supplemented thereafter from time to time. For purposes of the Securityholders Agreement, the Units are "Employee Securities," as that term is defined in the Securityholders Agreement.

3


        1.23     Termination Date .    The term "Termination Date" means the date upon which Director's service as a member of the Board is terminated.

        1.24     Vestar .    The term "Vestar" means Vestar Capital Partners V, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership.

2.     Subscription for and Purchase of Units.     

        2.1     Purchase of Units .    Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, Director hereby subscribes for and agrees to purchase, and the Company hereby agrees to issue and sell to Director, on the Closing Date the number of Preferred Units, Class A Units and Class E Units set forth in Schedule I attached hereto at the applicable prices per unit and for the aggregate amounts (the " Purchase Price ") set forth in Schedule I attached hereto.

        2.2     The Closing .    The closing (the " Closing ") of the purchase of Units hereunder shall take place simultaneously with the execution hereof (the " Closing Date "). At the Closing, Director shall deliver to the Company (i) the Purchase Price, payable by delivery of the amount in cash set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, by delivery of a cashier's or certified check or by wire transfer in immediately available funds and (ii) a writing satisfactory to the Company and executed by Director that evidences Director's acceptance and adoption of all of the terms and provisions of each of the LLC Agreement and the Securityholders Agreement.

        2.3     Section 83(b) Election .    Within 10 days after the Closing, Director shall provide the Company with a completed election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto. The Company shall timely file (via certified mail, return receipt requested) such election with the Internal Revenue Service (" IRS "), and shall provide Director with proof of such timely filing.

        2.4     Closing Conditions .    Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Company shall be under no obligation to issue and sell to Director any Units unless (i) Director is a member of the Board on the Closing Date; (ii) the representations of Director contained in Section 3 hereof are true and correct in all material respects as of the Closing Date and (iii) Director is not in breach of any agreement, obligation or covenant herein required to be performed or observed by Director on or prior to the Closing Date.

3.     Investment Representations and Covenants of Director.     

        3.1     Units Unregistered .    Director acknowledges and represents that Director has been advised by the Company that:

        3.2     Additional Investment Representations .    Director represents and warrants that:

4


4.     Certain Sales and Forfeitures Upon Termination of Employment.     

        4.1     Put Option.     

5


4.2     Call Options.     

6


provided that in any case the Board shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to increase any purchase price set forth above.

        4.3     Obligation to Sell Several .    If there is more than one member of Director Group, the failure of any one member thereof to perform its obligations hereunder shall not excuse or affect the obligations of any other member thereof, and the closing of the purchases from such other members by the Company shall not excuse, or constitute a waiver of its rights against, the defaulting member.

5.     Certain Limitations on the Company's Obligations to Purchase Units.     

        5.1     Deferral of Purchases .    

        5.2     Payment for Units .    If at any time the Company elects or is required to purchase any Units pursuant to Section 4, the Company shall pay the purchase price for the Units it purchases (i) first, by the cancellation of any indebtedness, if any, owing from Director to the Company or any of its subsidiaries (which indebtedness shall be applied pro rata against the proceeds receivable by each member of Director Group receiving consideration in such repurchase) and (ii) then, by the Company's delivery of a check or wire transfer of immediately available funds for the remainder of the purchase price, if any, against delivery of the certificates or other instruments representing the Units so

7


purchased, duly endorsed; provided that if any of the conditions set forth in Section 5.1(a) exists which prohibits such cash payment (either directly or indirectly as a result of the prohibition of a related cash dividend or distribution), the portion of the cash payment so prohibited may be made, to the extent such payment is not prohibited, by the Company's delivery of a junior subordinated promissory note (which shall be subordinated and subject in right of payment to the prior payment of any debt outstanding under the Financing Agreements and any modifications, renewals, extensions, replacements and refunding of all such indebtedness) of the Company (a " Junior Subordinated Note ") in a principal amount equal to the balance of the purchase price, payable (x) in the event of a termination of employment referenced in Section 4.2(a)(i) and (ii), as soon as the conditions set forth in Section 5.1(a) no longer exist or (x) in the event of a termination of Director's service as a member of the Board referenced in Section 4.2(a)(iii), on the fifth anniversary of the issuance thereof, and bearing interest payable annually at the Applicable Federal Rate on the date of issuance; provided further that if any of the conditions set forth in Section 5.1(a) exists which prohibits such payment (or the payment described in the next proviso) by delivery of a Junior Subordinated Note, the portion of the payment so prohibited may be made, to the extent such payment is not prohibited, by the Company's delivery of preferred units of the Company having an aggregate liquidation preference equal to the balance of the purchase price; provided further that in the case of a purchase pursuant to Section 4.2(a)(iii) the Company may elect at any time to deliver a Junior Subordinated Note in a principal amount equal to all or a portion of the cash purchase price (in lieu of paying such portion of the purchase price in cash), which Junior Subordinated Note shall mature on the fifth anniversary of its issuance and accrue interest annually at the Applicable Federal Rate on the date of issuance, which interest shall be payable at maturity. The Company shall use its reasonable efforts to repurchase Units pursuant to Section 4.1(a) or Section 4.2(a)(i) or Section 4.2(a)(ii) with cash and/or to prepay any Junior Subordinated Notes or redeem any preferred units issued in connection with a repurchase of Units pursuant to Section 4.1(a) or Section 4.2(a)(i) or Section 4.2(a)(ii). The Company shall have the right set forth in clause (i) of the first sentence of this Section 5.2 whether or not the member of Director Group selling such units is an obligor of the Company. Any Junior Subordinated Note (or preferred units issued in lieu thereof) shall become prepayable (or redeemable) upon a Sale of the Company from net cash proceeds, if any, payable to the Company or its unitholders; to the extent that sufficient net cash proceeds are not so payable, the Junior Subordinated Note (or preferred units issued in lieu thereof) shall be cancelled in exchange for such other non-cash consideration received by unitholders in the Sale of the Company having a fair market value equal to the principal of and accrued interest on the note. Any Junior Subordinated Note (or preferred units issued in lieu thereof) also shall become prepayable upon the consummation of an initial Public Offering. The principal of and accrued interest on any such note may be prepaid (and preferred units issued in lieu thereof may be redeemed) in whole or in part at any time at the option of the Company. If interest (or cash dividends) is required to be paid on any Junior Subordinated Note (or preferred units issued in lieu thereof) prior to maturity and any of the conditions set forth in Section 5.1(a) exists or if any such cash payment would result in adverse accounting treatment for the Company which prohibits the payment of such interest (or dividends) in cash, such interest may be cumulated and accrued until and to the extent that such prohibition no longer exists.

8


6.     Miscellaneous.     

        6.1     Transfers to Permitted Transferees .    Prior to the transfer of Units to a Permitted Transferee (other than a transfer subsequent to a Sale of the Company), Director shall deliver to the Company a written agreement of the proposed transferee (a) evidencing such Person's undertaking to be bound by the terms of this Agreement and (b) acknowledging that the Units transferred to such Person will continue to be Units for purposes of this Agreement in the hands of such Person. Any transfer or attempted transfer of Units in violation of any provision of this Agreement or the Securityholders Agreement shall be void, and the Company shall not record such transfer on its books or treat any purported transferee of such Units as the owner of such Units for any purpose.

        6.2     Recapitalizations, Exchanges, Etc., Affecting Units .    The provisions of this Agreement shall apply, to the full extent set forth herein with respect to Units, to any and all securities of the Company or any successor or assign of the Company (whether by merger, consolidation, sale of assets or otherwise) which may be issued in respect of, in exchange for, or in substitution of the Units, by reason of any dividend payable in units, issuance of units, combination, recapitalization, reclassification, merger, consolidation or otherwise.

        6.3     Director's Employment by the Company .    Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to (i) obligate the Company or any subsidiary of the Company to employ Director in any capacity whatsoever or to prohibit or restrict the Company (or any such subsidiary) from terminating the employment of Director at any time or for any reason whatsoever, with or without Cause, or (ii) require Director to remain a member of the Board.

        6.4     Cooperation .    Director agrees to cooperate with the Company in taking action reasonably necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        6.5     Binding Effect .    The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and accrue to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns; provided, however, that no Transferee shall derive any rights under this Agreement unless and until such Transferee has executed and delivered to the Company a valid undertaking and becomes bound by the terms of this Agreement; and provided further that Vestar is a third party beneficiary of this Agreement and shall have the right to enforce the provisions hereof.

        6.6     Amendment; Waiver .    This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by the parties hereto. No waiver by any party hereto of any of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless set forth in a writing executed by the party so waiving.

        6.7     Governing Law .    This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to contracts made and to be performed therein.

        6.8     Jurisdiction .    Any suit, action or proceeding with respect to this Agreement, or any judgment entered by any court in respect of any thereof, shall be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Delaware, and each of the Company and the members of Director Group hereby submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts for the purpose of any such suit, action, proceeding or judgment. Each of the members of Director Group and the Company hereby irrevocably waives (i) any objections which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement brought in any court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Delaware, (ii) any claim that any such suit, action or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in any inconvenient forum and (iii) any right to a jury trial.

        6.9     Notices .    All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered, telecopied (with confirmation of receipt), one day after deposit with a reputable overnight delivery service (charges prepaid) and three days after

9



deposit in the U.S. Mail (postage prepaid and return receipt requested) to the address set forth below or such other address as the recipient party has previously delivered notice to the sending party.

        6.10     Integration .    This Agreement and the documents referred to herein or delivered pursuant hereto which form a part hereof contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof. There are no restrictions, agreements, promises, representations, warranties, covenants or undertakings with respect to the subject matter hereof other than those expressly set forth herein and therein. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter.

        6.11     Counterparts .    This Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, and by different parties on separate counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

        6.12     Injunctive Relief .    Director and Director's Permitted Transferees each acknowledges and agrees that a violation of any of the terms of this Agreement will cause the Company irreparable injury for which adequate remedy at law is not available. Accordingly, it is agreed that the Company shall be entitled to an injunction, restraining order or other equitable relief to prevent breaches of the provisions of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in any court of competent jurisdiction in the United States or any state thereof, in addition to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law or equity.

        6.13     Rights Cumulative; Waiver .    The rights and remedies of Director and the Company under this Agreement shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies which each would otherwise have hereunder or at law or in equity or by statute, and no failure or delay by any party in exercising any right or remedy shall impair any such right or remedy or operate as a waiver of such right or remedy, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any power or right preclude such party's

10



other or further exercise or the exercise of any other power or right. The waiver by any party hereto of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach and no failure by any party to exercise any right or privilege hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of such party's rights or privileges hereunder or shall be deemed a waiver of such party's rights to exercise the same at any subsequent time or times hereunder.

*    *    *    *    *

11


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Management Unit Subscription Agreement as of the date first above written.


 

 

NMH INVESTMENT, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

 

 

By:

 

 

        Name:
        Title:

 

 

By:

 

  

        [            ]

SCHEDULE I

Purchased Units
  Number   Price per Unit   Aggregate Amount

Preferred Units:

  [        ]   [        ]   [        ]

Class A Units:

  [        ]   [        ]   [        ]

Class E Units:

  [        ]   [        ]   [        ]
             
 

Total

          [        ]
             

Exhibit 1.2 to Director Unit Subscription Agreement

Class E Units

        With respect to a purchase of Class E Units pursuant to Section 4.2 in the case of a termination of Director's service as a member of the Board described in Section 4.2(a)(i) or Section 4.2(a)(ii), the Applicable Percentage shall be determined in accordance with the following table attached to this Exhibit 1.2 as Annex A based on the Month (as defined below) during which the service of Director is terminated:

        For purposes of this Exhibit 1.2, "Month" means (i) in the case of Month 1, the period commencing on [            ] (the "Measurement Date") and ending on the calendar day immediately preceding the one-month anniversary of the Measurement Date, (ii) for Month 2, the period commencing on the one-month anniversary of the Measurement Date and ending on the calendar day immediately preceding the two-month anniversary of the Measurement Date and (iii) for each other Month, the period determined in the manner in which Month 2 was determined, substituting the number of the month minus one for "one" in the preceding clause (ii) and substituting the number of the month for "two" in the preceding clause (ii).



Annex A to Exhibit 1.2

 
  Month During Which Service is Terminated   Applicable Percentage  

    1     0.00 %

    2     0.00 %

    3     0.00 %

    4     0.00 %

    5     0.00 %

    6     0.00 %

    7     0.00 %

    8     0.00 %

    9     0.00 %

    10     0.00 %

    11     0.00 %

End of 1st year

    12     0.00 %

    13     20.00 %

    14     21.70 %

    15     23.40 %

    16     25.10 %

    17     26.80 %

    18     28.50 %

    19     30.20 %

    20     31.90 %

    21     33.60 %

    22     35.30 %

    23     37.00 %

End of 2nd year

    24     38.70 %

    25     40.40 %

    26     42.10 %

    27     43.80 %

    28     45.50 %

    29     47.20 %

    30     48.90 %

    31     50.60 %

    32     52.30 %

    33     54.00 %

    34     55.70 %

    35     57.40 %

End of 3rd year

    36     59.10 %

    37     60.80 %

    38     62.50 %

    39     64.20 %

    40     65.90 %

    41     67.60 %

    42     69.30 %

    43     71.00 %

    44     72.70 %

    45     74.40 %

    46     76.10 %

    47     77.80 %

End of 4th year

    48     79.50 %

    49     81.20 %

    50     82.90 %

    51     84.60 %

    52     86.30 %

    53     88.00 %

    54     89.70 %

    55     91.40 %

    56     93.10 %

    57     94.80 %

    58     96.50 %

    59     98.20 %

End of 5th year

    60     99.90 %

    61 and thereafter     100.00 %



QuickLinks

DIRECTOR UNIT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of National Mentor Holdings, Inc.

Subsidiary
  State of
Incorporation/
Organization
  Name(s) under which doing business

CareMeridian, LLC

  Delaware    

Center for Comprehensive Services, Inc.

  Illinois    

Community Care Indemnity Company

  Vermont    

Cornerstone Living Skills, Inc.

  California    

Family Advocacy Services, LLC

  Delaware    

First Step Independent Living Program, Inc.

  California    

Horrigan Cole Enterprises, Inc.

  California  

Cole Vocational Services

Illinois Mentor, Inc.

  Illinois    

Loyd's Liberty Homes, Inc.

  California    

Massachusetts Mentor, Inc.

  Massachusetts    

Mentor Management, Inc.

  Delaware    

Mentor Maryland, Inc.

  Maryland    

National Mentor Healthcare, LLC

  Delaware  

Alabama Mentor

     

Arizona Mentor

     

California Mentor

     

Creative Home Programs

     

DC Mentor

     

Delaware Mentor

     

Florida Mentor

     

Georgia Mentor

     

Home Care Options

     

Idaho Mentor

     

Independent Development for the Disabled

     

Indiana Mentor

     

Kentucky Mentor

     

Kingsbury Academy

     

Louisiana Mentor

     

New Hampshire Mentor

     

New Jersey Mentor

     

North Carolina Mentor

     

Pennsylvania Mentor

     

Rhode Island Mentor

     

Texas Mentor

     

Washington Mentor

National Mentor Holdings, LLC

  Delaware    

National Mentor Services Holdings, LLC

  Delaware    

National Mentor Services, LLC

  Delaware  

Family Advocacy Services

     

Mentor Habilitation Services

     

MENTOR Oregon

     

Missouri Mentor

     

Nebraska Mentor

National Mentor, LLC

  Delaware    

Ohio Mentor, Inc.

  Ohio    

REM Arizona Rehabilitation, Inc.

  Arizona  

1


Subsidiary
  State of
Incorporation/
Organization
  Name(s) under which doing business

REM Arrowhead, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Central Lakes, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Colorado, Inc.

  Colorado    

REM Community Options, LLC

  West Virginia    

REM Community Payroll Services, LLC

  Minnesota    

REM Connecticut Community Services, Inc.

  Connecticut    

REM Consulting of Ohio, Inc.

  Ohio    

REM Developmental Services, Inc.

  Iowa    

REM Health, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Health of Iowa, Inc.

  Iowa    

REM Health of Wisconsin, Inc.

  Wisconsin    

REM Health of Wisconsin II, Inc.

  Wisconsin    

REM Heartland, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Hennepin, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Home Health, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Indiana Community Services, Inc.

  Indiana    

REM Indiana Community Services II, Inc.

  Indiana    

REM Indiana, Inc.

  Indiana    

REM Iowa Community Services, Inc.

  Iowa    

REM Iowa, Inc.

  Iowa    

REM Management, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Maryland, Inc.

  Maryland    

REM Minnesota Community Services, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Minnesota, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Nevada, Inc.

  Nevada  

Creative Home Services

REM New Jersey, Inc.

  New Jersey    

REM New Jersey Properties, Inc.

  New Jersey    

REM North Dakota, Inc.

  North Dakota    

REM North Star, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Ohio, Inc.

  Ohio    

REM Ohio Waivered Services, Inc.

  Ohio    

REM Pennsylvania Community Services, Inc.

  Pennsylvania    

REM Ramsey, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM River Bluffs, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM South Central Services, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Southwest Services, Inc.

  Minnesota    

REM Utah, Inc.

  Utah  

Mentor Utah

REM West Virginia, LLC

  West Virginia    

REM Wisconsin, Inc.

  Wisconsin  

CCS-Wisconsin

REM Wisconsin II, Inc.

  Wisconsin    

REM Wisconsin III, Inc.

  Wisconsin    

REM Woodvale, Inc.

  Minnesota    

Rockland Child Development Services, Inc.

  New York    

South Carolina Mentor, Inc.

  South Carolina    

Transitional Services Sub, LLC

  Indiana    

Unlimited Quest, Inc.

  California    

2




QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 31.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Edward M. Murphy, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Mentor Holdings, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

December 22, 2008

  /s/ EDWARD M. MURPHY

Edward M. Murphy
President and Chief Executive Officer



QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.2

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Denis M. Holler, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Mentor Holdings, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

December 22, 2008

  /s/ DENIS M. HOLLER

Denis M. Holler
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 32

Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

        In connection with the annual report of National Mentor Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to his knowledge:


Date: December 22, 2008   By:   /s/ EDWARD M. MURPHY

Edward M. Murphy
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 22, 2008

 

By:

 

/s/ DENIS M. HOLLER

Denis M. Holler
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



QuickLinks