UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE) | ||
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009. |
||
OR |
||
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO . |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13627
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) |
26-4413382
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) |
|
350 INDIANA STREET, SUITE 800 GOLDEN, COLORADO (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) |
|
80401 (ZIP CODE) |
(303) 839-5060
(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS: YES ý NO o
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT HAS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY AND POSTED ON ITS CORPORATE WEB SITE, IF ANY, EVERY INTERACTIVE DATA FILE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND POSTED PURSUANT TO RULE 405 OF REGULATION S-T (§232.405 OF THIS CHAPTER) DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND POST SUCH FILES). YES o NO o
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A LARGE ACCELERATED FILER, AN ACCELERATED FILER, A NON-ACCELERATED FILER, OR A SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY:
LARGE ACCELERATED FILER o | ACCELERATED FILER ý | |
NON-ACCELERATED FILER o |
|
SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY ý |
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT): YES o NO ý
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT HAS FILED ALL DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTIONS 12, 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 SUBSEQUENT TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF SECURITIES UNDER A PLAN CONFIRMED BY A COURT: YES ý NO o
AT AUGUST 6, 2009, 3,257,735 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, WERE ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
2
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
||||||||
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
||||||||
|
(in thousands, except
share data) |
||||||||||
Assets |
|||||||||||
Current assets |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15,658 | $ | 33,723 | |||||||
Restricted cash |
| 20,575 | |||||||||
Investments |
4,832 | 16,351 | |||||||||
Trade receivables |
283 | 7,315 | |||||||||
Inventories |
| 75,008 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
1,312 | 15,550 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
22,085 | 168,522 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
9,024 | 202,534 | |||||||||
Assets held for sale |
3,106 | | |||||||||
Ore stockpile inventories |
| 72,628 | |||||||||
Value added tax recoverable |
| 157,146 | |||||||||
Investments |
| 5,487 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
558 | 30 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 34,773 | $ | 606,347 | |||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) |
|||||||||||
Current liabilities |
|||||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
$ | 3,592 | $ | 48,861 | |||||||
Accrued interest payable |
| 8,660 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities |
63 | | |||||||||
Current portion of long term debt |
| 523,610 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,655 | 581,131 | |||||||||
Long term debt |
| 59,951 | |||||||||
Asset retirement obligation |
| 9,155 | |||||||||
Other long term liabilities |
596 | 4,398 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
4,251 | 654,635 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) |
|||||||||||
Shareholders' equity (deficit) |
|||||||||||
Common stock, (Successor) $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 3,257,735 shares issued and outstanding |
33 | ||||||||||
Ordinary Shares, (Predecessor) $.01 par value, 175,000,000 shares authorized; 59,000,832 shares issued and outstanding |
590 | ||||||||||
Additional paid in capital |
36,837 | 680,901 | |||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(7,174 | ) | (880,020 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
826 | (551 | ) | ||||||||
Parent Company's shareholder's equity (deficit) |
30,522 | (199,080 | ) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries |
| 150,792 | |||||||||
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) |
30,522 | (48,288 | ) | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit) |
$ | 34,773 | $ | 606,347 | |||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For The Period
March 25, 2009 Through June 30, 2009 |
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009 |
|
2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Management service fees (Note 17) |
$ | 3,147 | $ | 1,350 | $ | 3,358 | $ | 1,350 | $ | 2,700 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs of services (Note 17) |
(1,004 | ) | | (1,084 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||
Exploration expense |
(3,021 | ) | (9,137 | ) | (3,469 | ) | (3,482 | ) | (15,329 | ) | ||||||||||||
Administrative expense |
(2,980 | ) | (3,342 | ) | (3,336 | ) | (4,779 | ) | (8,637 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
(609 | ) | (756 | ) | (609 | ) | (2,717 | ) | (1,599 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
(143 | ) | (163 | ) | (152 | ) | (102 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(7,757 | ) | (13,398 | ) | (8,650 | ) | (11,080 | ) | (25,889 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(4,610 | ) | (12,048 | ) | (5,292 | ) | (9,730 | ) | (23,189 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
166 | 1,738 | 290 | 1,010 | 3,582 | |||||||||||||||||
Royalty income |
127 | 198 | 127 | 88 | 198 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest and other expense |
| (2,641 | ) | | (345 | ) | (5,279 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of asset |
(180 | ) | | (180 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on foreign currency |
90 | 206 | 94 | (13 | ) | 95 | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on extingushment of debt |
| | | 248,165 | | |||||||||||||||||
Loss on auction rate securities |
(1,332 | ) | (3,100 | ) | (1,332 | ) | (828 | ) | (3,100 | ) | ||||||||||||
Reorganization costs, net |
(565 | ) | | (668 | ) | (3,683 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Fresh start accounting adjustments |
| | | 9,122 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(1,694 | ) | (3,599 | ) | (1,669 | ) | 253,516 | (4,504 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income (taxes) benefit |
(6,304 | ) | (15,647 | ) | (6,961 | ) | 243,786 | (27,693 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income taxes |
(187 | ) | (145 | ) | (213 | ) | (165 | ) | (287 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
(6,491 | ) | (15,792 | ) | (7,174 | ) | 243,621 | (27,980 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| 256,157 | | (4,153 | ) | 266,371 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (6,491 | ) | $ | 240,365 | $ | (7,174 | ) | $ | 239,468 | $ | 238,391 | ||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| $ | (62,824 | ) | $ | | $ | (7,869 | ) | $ | (35,130 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholder's |
$ | (6,491 | ) | $ | 177,541 | $ | (7,174 | ) | $ | 231,599 | $ | 203,261 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
826 | $ | 2,232 | $ | 826 | $ | 940 | $ | 1,664 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Successor/Predecessor shareholder's |
$ | (5,665 | ) | $ | 179,773 | $ | (6,348 | ) | $ | 232,539 | $ | 204,925 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) per Common/Ordinary Sharebasic |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholders |
$ |
(2.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
$ |
(2.40 |
) |
$ |
4.13 |
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
||||||||
Discontinued operations attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholders |
| 3.28 | | (0.20 | ) | 3.92 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholders |
$ | (2.17 | ) | $ | 3.01 | $ | (2.40 | ) | $ | 3.93 | $ | 3.45 | ||||||||||
4
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For The Period
March 25, 2009 Through June 30, 2009 |
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2009 |
|
2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per Common/Ordinary Sharediluted |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholders |
$ |
(2.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
$ |
(2.40 |
) |
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
||||||
Discontinued operations attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholders |
| 3.28 | | (0.17 | ) | 3.92 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to the Successor/Predecessor shareholders |
$ | (2.17 | ) | $ | 3.01 | $ | (2.40 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | 3.45 | ||||||||
Weighted average Common Stock/Ordinary Shares outstandingbasic |
2,987,735 | 58,935,475 | 2,987,735 | 59,000,832 | 58,924,741 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average Common Stock/Ordinary Shares outstandingdiluted |
2,987,735 | 58,935,475 | 2,987,735 | 69,171,400 | 58,924,741 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
For The Period
March 25, 2009 Through June 30, 2009 |
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|||||||||||
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (Note 19) |
$ | (10,138 | ) | $ | (13,849 | ) | $ | 12,129 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Purchase of available for sale investments |
| (4,447 | ) | (18,932 | ) | |||||||||
Sale of available for sale investments |
| 21,113 | 62,043 | |||||||||||
Maturities of held-to-maturity investments |
| | 2,000 | |||||||||||
Settlement of metal derivative instruments |
| | (111,973 | ) | ||||||||||
Released from (transfer to) restricted cash to collateralize credit facility, letters of credit and interest payments , net |
| 5,732 | 889 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of interest in subsidiary, net |
| 25,225 | 70,000 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
600 | | | |||||||||||
Receipt of deferred payments from minority interest |
| | 7,396 | |||||||||||
Capitalized costs and acquisitions of property, plant and equipment |
(424 | ) | (4,580 | ) | (16,367 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
$ | 176 | $ | 43,043 | $ | (4,944 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Payments of notes payable and long term debt |
| (47,297 | ) | (4,233 | ) | |||||||||
Amounts drawn on DIP facility |
| 6,500 | ||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest contributions |
| 3,500 | 38,500 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
$ | | $ | (37,297 | ) | $ | 34,267 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(9,962 | ) | (8,103 | ) | 41,452 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalentsbeginning of period |
25,620 | 33,723 | 40,736 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalentsend of period |
$ | 15,658 | $ | 25,620 | $ | 82,188 | ||||||||
See Note 19 for supplemental cash flow information.
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ordinary Shares |
|
|
|
Total
Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated
Deficit |
Non-controlling
Interest |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands except share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
59,000,832 | $ | 590.0 | $ | 680,901 | $ | (880,020 | ) | $ | (551 | ) | $ | 150,792 | $ | (48,288 | ) | |||||||
(Predecessor) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation accrued |
| | 2,920 | | | | 2,920 | ||||||||||||||||
Ordinary Shares of Apex Silver Mines Limited to be canceled |
(59,000,832 | ) | (590.0 | ) | (683,821 | ) | | | | (684,411 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities |
| | | | 940 | | 940 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
| | | 231,599 | | 7,869 | 239,468 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital contributions |
| | | | | 3,500 | 3,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest payable to non controlling interest |
| | | | | 7,899 | 7,899 | ||||||||||||||||
Elimination of Predecessor accumulated deficit |
| | | 648,421 | | | 648,421 | ||||||||||||||||
Elimination of predecessor accumulated OCI |
| | | | (389 | ) | (170,060 | ) | (170,449 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance, March 24, 2009 |
| $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
(Successor) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of new equity in connection with emergence from Chapter 11 |
2,987,735 | $ | 30.0 | $ | 36,231 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 36,261 | ||||||||||
Stock compensation accrued |
270,000 | 2.7 | 606 | | | | 609 | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities |
| | | | 826 | | 826 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (7,174 | ) | | | (7,174 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
3,257,735 | $ | 32.7 | $ | 36,837 | $ | (7,174 | ) | $ | 826 | $ | | $ | 30,522 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
1. Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements and Nature of Operations
Upon emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 24, 2009 as discussed in Note 2, Golden Minerals Company (the "Company") a Delaware corporation, became the successor to Apex Silver Mines Limited ("ASML") for purposes of reporting under the U.S. federal securities laws. References in this Form 10-Q to "Successor" refer to the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries on or after March 25, 2009, the day following emergence from Chapter 11. References to "Predecessor" refer to the accounts of ASML and its subsidiaries prior to March 25, 2009.
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Such rules and regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"), so long as such omissions do not render the financial statements misleading.
In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for fair statement of the results for the periods presented. With the exception of the adjustments made in connection with fresh start accounting, as described in Note 2 below, all adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements of ASML included in its 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Prior to the emergence from Chapter 11 and the sale of the San Cristóbal mine, ASML was the 65% owner and operator of the San Cristóbal silver and zinc mine in Bolivia. Following emergence from Chapter 11 and the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo, the Company is primarily engaged in the exploration and advancement of its portfolio of exploration properties primarily in South America and Mexico and in providing operations management services to Sumitomo for the San Cristóbal mine. The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business. However the continuing operations of the Company are dependent upon its ability to raise sufficient capital and to generate future profitable operations. The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as mineral properties in the consolidated balance sheet are dependent on the ability of the Company to continue to finance exploration and development activities that would lead to profitable production or proceeds from the disposition of the mineral properties. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising additional financing in the future on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.
2. Chapter 11 Proceedings, Financial Restructuring and Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine
Chapter 11 Reorganization
On January 12, 2009, ASML and its wholly owned subsidiary, Apex Silver Mines Corporation ("ASMC"), filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). ASML also commenced a provisional liquidation proceeding in the Cayman Islands. ASML's subsidiaries outside of the United States, including Minera San Cristóbal S.A. ("MSC"), the Bolivian subsidiary that owns and operates the San Cristóbal mine, were not included in the Chapter 11 filing or in any other bankruptcy or reorganization proceeding.
8
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
2. Chapter 11 Proceedings, Financial Restructuring and Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine (Continued)
Under Chapter 11, ASML operated its businesses between January 12, 2009 and March 24, 2009 as a debtor-in-possession under court protection from creditors and claimants under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and under the supervision of the joint provisional liquidators in the Cayman Islands. On January 20, 2009, ASML entered into a $35 million debtor-in-possession term credit facility (the "DIP Financing Facility") with Sumitomo as lender. The purpose of the DIP Financing Facility was to provide ASML with the cash and liquidity necessary to fund its 65% share of working capital required by the San Cristóbal mine. As of March 24, 2009, ASML had borrowed $6.5 million under the DIP Financing Facility. Upon emergence from Chapter 11 and the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo, as discussed below, Sumitomo waived and released the Company from any liability associated with amounts outstanding, including interest, under the DIP Financing Facility, and the Company recorded a gain of $6.6 million which is included as an offset to the loss on the sale of interest in a subsidiary which is a component of discontinued operations.
A Joint Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Bankruptcy Court") on March 4, 2009, and the Company emerged from Chapter 11 protection on March 24, 2009 (the "Effective Date"). At that time, and subsequent to the closing of the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo as described below, all of the remaining assets of ASML, other than a small cash reserve for the payment of ASML's liquidation expenses, were transferred to the Company. A compulsory liquidation proceeding was initiated for ASML in the Cayman Islands and all of the ordinary shares of ASML will be formally canceled in that proceeding.
Under the Plan, holders of ASML's 2.875% and 4.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2024 (collectively, the "Notes") received in exchange for the cancellation of the Notes a pro rata distribution of (i) 2,987,735 shares of common stock of the Company, and (ii) approximately $45.0 million of cash plus any other cash or cash equivalents held by the Company in excess of the sum of $15.0 million plus an amount equal to accrued liabilities at March 31, 2009 and certain projected reorganization expenses. To record the effect of the reorganization, ASML wrote off the $290.0 million liability related to the Notes plus $3.2 million interest accrued through January 12, 2009, the Chapter 11 filing date, and recorded a $248.2 million gain at March 24, 2009. Had ASML not been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy between January 12, 2009 and the Effective Date, the Notes would have accrued an additional $1.9 million of interest.
Other holders of unsecured claims against ASML and ASMC, except ASML's equity holders, received or will receive cash payment for their claims up to a maximum recovery of $10,000 per claim, or a pro rata distribution of common stock of the Company. Through June 30, 2009 the Company has made cash payments of $49,000 in resolution of such claims and has issued no shares of common stock. ASML's equity holders received no recovery under the Plan, and their shares will be canceled in connection with ASML's Cayman Islands liquidation proceeding.
On the Effective Date, Sumitomo and the other senior lenders waived and released ASML and the Company from any liability associated with amounts outstanding under the project finance facility relating to the San Cristóbal mine.
9
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
2. Chapter 11 Proceedings, Financial Restructuring and Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine (Continued)
Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine
On the Effective Date, in conjunction with, and as a condition to the emergence from bankruptcy, ASML sold to Sumitomo its remaining direct and indirect interests in the San Cristóbal mine, including its 65% interest in MSC, for a cash purchase price of $27.5 million, plus $2.5 million in expense reimbursements and the assumption of certain liabilities. The transaction was completed pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 12, 2009 (the "Purchase Agreement") among ASML, certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries of ASML, Sumitomo and one of Sumitomo's wholly-owned subsidiaries. Under the Purchase Agreement and the Plan, ASML and the Company were released from all liabilities associated with the San Cristóbal mine, including ASML's guarantee of San Cristóbal's indebtedness.
On the Effective Date, ASMC, which has been renamed Golden Minerals Services Corporation ("Golden Services"), entered into a Management Services Agreement with Sumitomo (the "Management Agreement") under which it is providing certain operations management services with respect to the San Cristóbal mine. The Management Agreement has an initial term of twelve months and thereafter may be terminated by Golden Services with twelve months' prior notice or by Sumitomo with six months' prior notice. If terminated by Sumitomo, Golden Services would be entitled to a $1.0 million termination fee. Golden Services would not be required to pay a termination fee.
Fresh Start Accounting
As required by GAAP, the Company used fresh start accounting effective March 25, 2009 following the guidance of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' ("AICPA") Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code" ("SOP 90-7"). The Company adopted fresh start accounting because holders of existing voting shares immediately before the Effective Date received less that 50% of the voting shares of the Successor and the reorganized value of the Successor is less than its post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. The Company's financial statements reflect a new capital structure and a new basis in the identifiable assets and liabilities assumed. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements on or after March 25, 2009 are not comparable to the consolidated financial statements prior to that date.
SOP 90-7 requires, among other things, the determination of the reorganization value of the Successor upon emergence from bankruptcy. Reorganization value approximates the fair value of the entity, before considering liabilities, and approximates the amount a willing buyer would pay for the assets of the entity immediately after the restructuring. The fair value of the Company's assets was determined with the assistance of a third party valuation expert and a minerals engineering firm who used available comparable market data and quotations, discounted cash flow analysis, and other methods in determining the appropriate asset fair values. Based on these valuations and applying the principles of Financial Accounting Standard "Business Combinations (Revised)" ("FAS 141R"), the Company has adjusted upward the reported amounts of certain of its individual assets, net of liabilities, by a combined total of $9.1 million and has reflected that adjustment in the Predecessor's statement of operations in accordance with SOP 90-7. The upward adjustment relates primarily to recording at fair value certain exploration properties and a royalty interest that were previously reflected on the Predecessor's balance sheet at a zero carrying value, because all exploration costs at such properties were expensed as incurred. Future costs of exploration will continue to be expensed as incurred.
10
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
2. Chapter 11 Proceedings, Financial Restructuring and Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine (Continued)
The total equity of the Successor at the Effective Date, totaling $36.5 million, has been adjusted to reflect no beginning retained earnings or deficit, after taking into account the cancelation of the Notes, the issuance of new shares in the Company, and the fresh start accounting adjustments. The total equity of the Successor company at the Effective Date reflects the estimated enterprise value of the Company following the principles of SOP 90-7 and FAS 141R. As part of the Company's bankruptcy proceedings, an enterprise value ranging from $15 million to $30 million was initially projected based on a blend of valuations using market value multiples for peer companies and an assessment of the underlying values of the Company's mineral properties at the time of the bankruptcy filing. As discussed above, and in conjunction with finalizing the fresh start accounting adjustments, additional valuation assessments of the fair value of the Successor company's assets was performed with the assistance of a third party valuation expert and a minerals engineering firm to arrive at the Company's reported equity value at the Effective Date of $36.5 million.
11
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
2. Chapter 11 Proceedings, Financial Restructuring and Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine (Continued)
The balance sheet adjustments presented below summarize the impact of the reorganization, the sale of the San Cristóbal mine and the application of fresh start accounting as of the Effective Date.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
REORGANIZED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
March 24, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Predecessor
Balances |
Sale of
San Cristóbal Mine (Note I) |
Reorganization
Adjustments (Note II) |
Fresh Start
Adjustments (Note III) |
Successor
Balances |
|||||||||||||
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 43,120 | $ | 27,500 | $ | (45,000 | ) | $ | | $ | 25,620 | |||||||
Restricted cash |
14,853 | (14,853 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Investments |
88 | | | | 88 | |||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
19,208 | (19,023 | ) | | | 185 | ||||||||||||
Inventories |
89,633 | (89,633 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
8,543 | (7,025 | ) | | | 1,518 | ||||||||||||
Total current assets |
175,445 | (103,034 | ) | (45,000 | ) | | 27,411 | |||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
190,439 | (187,387 | ) | | 9,605 | 12,657 | ||||||||||||
Ore stockpile inventories |
74,756 | (74,756 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Value added tax recoverable |
168,842 | (168,842 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Investments |
5,249 | | | | 5,249 | |||||||||||||
Other |
48 | (44 | ) | | | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 614,779 | $ | (534,063 | ) | $ | (45,000 | ) | $ | 9,605 | $ | 45,321 | ||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit |
||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
$ | 44,889 | $ | (36,312 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,577 | |||||||
Accrued interest payable |
8,987 | (5,809 | ) | (3,178 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Current portion of long term debt |
553,516 | (263,529 | ) | (289,987 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
607,392 | (305,650 | ) | (293,165 | ) | | 8,577 | |||||||||||
Long term debt |
37,517 | (37,517 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligation |
9,675 | (9,675 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Other long term liabilities |
2,752 | (2,752 | ) | | 483 | 483 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
657,336 | (355,594 | ) | (293,165 | ) | 483 | 9,060 | |||||||||||
Shareholders' deficit |
||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary Shares (Common Stock) |
560 | | (530 | ) | | 30 | ||||||||||||
Additional paid in capital |
684,122 | | (647,891 | ) | | 36,231 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(897,299 | ) | (8,409 | ) | 896,586 | 9,122 | | |||||||||||
Parent company's shareholder's equity (deficit) |
(212,617 | ) | (8,409 | ) | 248,165 | 9,122 | 36,261 | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries |
170,060 | (170,060 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) |
(42,557 | ) | (178,469 | ) | 248,165 | 9,122 | 36,261 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit |
$ | 614,779 | $ | (534,063 | ) | $ | (45,000 | ) | $ | 9,605 | $ | 45,321 | ||||||
12
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
2. Chapter 11 Proceedings, Financial Restructuring and Sale of the San Cristóbal Mine (Continued)
Note I.The adjustments relate to the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo include $27.5 million of cash received from the sale, the write-off of $561.5 million of assets sold to Sumitomo, net of $355.6 million of liabilities assumed by Sumitomo, the release of $170.1 million of non-controlling interest primarily related to Sumitomo and a loss on the sale of $8.4 million.
Note II.The reorganization adjustments include a $45.0 million reduction of cash for amounts paid to the holders to settle the Notes, a write-off of the $290.0 million liability related to the Notes, plus $3.2 million of accrued interest, and a $248.2 million gain on extinguishment of debt. The reorganization adjustments also include the write-off of $896.3 million of accumulated deficit, $647.6 million of additional paid in capital and $0.5 million of ordinary shares to reflect the elimination of the Predecessor's shareholder's equity.
Note III.The fresh start adjustments reflect a write-up of property, plant and equipment to estimated fair value including $7.3 million related to the Company's exploration properties, $2.0 million related to a mineral property royalty held by the Company and $0.3 million related to an aircraft owned by the Company. The fresh start adjustment also includes $0.5 million deferred tax liability adjustment to reflect the tax effect of the adjustments to property, plant and equipment. As the result of the above adjustments the Company recorded a positive $9.1 million fresh start adjustment in the statement of operations for the period ended March 24, 2009.
3. Discontinued Operations
As a result of the sale, results of operations of the San Cristóbal mine and related subsidiaries sold are presented as discontinued operations for the periods on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) through March 24, 2009, the date of the sale, including all direct financing related to the San Cristóbal mine (see Note 2). Additionally, costs incurred for management service fees that were previously eliminated upon consolidation have not been eliminated and are reflected as a cost of service between the discontinued operations and the Company.
The Company determined that reporting discontinued operations is appropriate in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 03-13, "Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations" ("EITF 03-13"). Based upon the guidance in EITF 03-13, the Company has determined that the continuing cash flows generated by the Management Agreement for the San Cristóbal mine are not so significant as to constitute continuing involvement with the mine. In addition, management has evaluated the Company's other ongoing involvement with the San Cristóbal mine as a result of the Management Agreement, and concluded that it does not represent significant continuing involvement as defined in EITF 03-13.
13
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
3. Discontinued Operations (Continued)
The results of discontinued operations for the period January 1, 2009 through March 24, 2009 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
Three Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
Sale of concentrates, net |
$ | 99,049 | $ | 59,678 | $ | 196,531 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales |
(59,955 | ) | (63,955 | ) | (131,761 | ) | ||||||
Management fee |
(1,350 | ) | (1,641 | ) | (2,991 | ) | ||||||
Asset retirement accretion expense |
(232 | ) | (197 | ) | (366 | ) | ||||||
Gain on comodity drivatives |
| 223,464 | 195,639 | |||||||||
Foreign currency gain |
1,960 | 5,764 | 10,739 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
(10,527 | ) | (7,169 | ) | (18,411 | ) | ||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(70,104 | ) | 156,266 | 52,849 | ||||||||
Income from operations |
28,945 | 215,944 | 249,380 | |||||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
67 | 149 | 352 | |||||||||
Interest expense and other borrowing costs |
(22,233 | ) | (11,910 | ) | (24,917 | ) | ||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(22,166 | ) | (11,761 | ) | (24,565 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
6,779 | 204,183 | 224,815 | |||||||||
Income taxes |
(2,523 | ) | (11,097 | ) | (21,515 | ) | ||||||
Income before sale of interest in subsidiaries |
4,256 | 193,086 | 203,300 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of interest in subsidiaries |
(8,409 | ) | 63,071 | 63,071 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | (4,153 | ) | $ | 256,157 | $ | 266,371 | |||||
14
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
3. Discontinued Operations (Continued)
The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations reported in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
|
December 31,
2008 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assets |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 992 | ||
Restricted cash |
20,070 | |||
Accounts receivable |
7,314 | |||
Inventories |
75,008 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
14,251 | |||
Current assets |
117,635 | |||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
199,040 | |||
Ore inventories |
72,628 | |||
Value added tax recoverable |
157,146 | |||
Other assets |
17 | |||
|
$ | 546,466 | ||
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity |
||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 44,878 | ||
Accrued interest payable |
5,797 | |||
Current portion of long term debt |
233,623 | |||
Current liabilities |
284,298 | |||
Long term debt |
59,951 | |||
Reclamation & remediation liabilities |
9,155 | |||
Other long term liabilities (income taxes) |
4,398 | |||
Non-controlling interest |
150,792 | |||
Accumulated earnings |
37,872 | |||
|
$ | 546,466 | ||
There are no remaining assets or liabilities from discontinued operations at June 30, 2009.
4. Significant Accounting Policies
Recently Adopted Standards
During May 2008 the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)" ("FSP No. APB 14-1"). FSP No. APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the embedded conversion option is required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("FAS No. 133"). FSP No. APB 14-1 will require the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments to be separately accounted for in a
15
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
4. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
manner that will reflect the entity's nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. As the Company did not have the ability or requirement to cash settle the Notes upon conversion, it does not have any instruments that fall within the scope of FSP No. APB 14-1 and accordingly there was no impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During February 2008 the FASB issued Staff Position No 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157" ("FSP FAS 157-2"). FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements" (FAS No. 157") by one year (until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, or fiscal year 2009 for the Company) for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 157-2 for the Company's nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
During March 2008 the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133" Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("FAS No. 161"). FAS No. 161 enhances the disclosure requirements under Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("FAS No. 133") pertaining to how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under FAS No. 133, and how derivative instruments and related hedge items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009, which did not impact the Company's disclosure requirements under FAS No. 133.
During December 2007 the FASB issued FAS No. 141R, which provides revised guidance on how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, non-controlling interests acquired, and goodwill acquired. Under fresh-start accounting, the Company re-measured the assets and liabilities assumed from ASML at fair value and recorded a $9.1 million gain on reorganization per the guidance of FAS No. 141R and SOP 90-7.
During December 2007 the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, "Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements"" ("FAS No. 160"). A non-controlling interest, formerly called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The objective of this Standard is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards related to non-controlling interests. The provisions of FAS No. 160 became effective for the Predecessor on January 1, 2009 and have been applied prospectively, except for the provisions related to the presentation of non-controlling interests, which have been applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Upon adoption of FAS No. 160, non-controlling interests of approximately $150.8 million as of December 31, 2008 were recast to a component of total equity in the consolidated balance sheet. In addition, prior to the adoption of FAS No. 160, GAAP did not permit the allocation of losses to the
16
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
4. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
non-controlling interest in excess of the non-controlling interest's recorded interest in the subsidiary. At December 31, 2008, a non-controlling interest of the Predecessor had accumulated approximately $2.4 million of such unallocated losses. At June 30, 2009 the Company had no activities which would require the reporting of a non-controlling interest.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" ("FSP FAS 157-4"), which provides additional guidance on determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate when a transaction is not orderly. In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" ("FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2"), which: i) clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other than temporarily impaired, ii) provides guidance on the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings and other comprehensive income and iii) expands the disclosures required for other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities. Also in April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" ("FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1"), which requires disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 157-4, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, and FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 for the interim period ended June 30, 2009 (see Note 13).
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 165 "Subsequent Events" ("FAS No. 165") which establishes accounting and reporting standards for events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The statement sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet in its financial statements, and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 165 for the interim period ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FAS No. 165 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principlesa replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" ("FAS No. 168" or "the Codification"). FAS No. 168 will become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification will supersede all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. FAS 168 is effective for the Company's
17
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
4. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
interim quarterly period beginning July 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 168 to have a material impact its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
5. Investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments include investments with maturities greater than three months, but not exceeding 12 months. Long-term investments include investments with maturities greater than 12 months.
The Company determines the appropriate classification of its investments in debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates those classifications at each balance sheet date. Debt securities are classified as held to maturity when the Company has the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held to maturity debt securities are stated at amortized cost. Available for sale investments are marked to market at each reporting period with changes in value recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). If declines in value are deemed other than temporary, a charge is made to net income (loss) for the period.
The following tables summarize the Company's investments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
June 30, 2009
|
Cost | Estimated Fair Value | Carrying Value | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Successor |
|||||||||||||||
Investments: |
|||||||||||||||
Short-term: |
|||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
|||||||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
$ | 5,249 | $ | 4,606 | $ | 4,606 | |||||||||
Common stock |
88 | 226 | 226 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale |
5,337 | 4,832 | 4,832 | ||||||||||||
Total short term |
$ | 5,337 | $ | 4,832 | $ | 4,832 | |||||||||
18
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
5. Investments (Continued)
December 31, 2008
|
Cost |
Estimated
Fair Value |
Carrying
Value |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Predecessor |
|||||||||||||||
Investments: |
|||||||||||||||
Short-term: |
|||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
|||||||||||||||
Common stock |
$ | 761 | $ | 124 | $ | 124 | |||||||||
Corporate notes |
223 | 224 | 224 | ||||||||||||
Government bonds |
15,924 | 16,003 | 16,003 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale |
16,908 | 16,351 | 16,351 | ||||||||||||
Total short term |
$ | 16,908 | $ | 16,351 | $ | 16,351 | |||||||||
Long-term: |
|||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
|||||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
$ | 405 | $ | 386 | $ | 386 | |||||||||
Auction rate securities |
5,101 | 5,101 | 5,101 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale |
5,506 | 5,487 | 5,487 | ||||||||||||
Total long term |
$ | 5,506 | $ | 5,487 | $ | 5,487 | |||||||||
Quoted market prices at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were used to determine the estimated fair values of the above investments, except with respect to the ARS. See Note 13 for further discussion on the fair value measurement techniques used by the Company to value the above investments.
Auction Rate Security Investments (ARS)
During July 2009 the Company sold certain of its ARS investments in a secondary market for $2.5 million (see Note 20). At June 30, 2009 these ARS investments held by the Company were recorded at an estimated fair value of $2.5 million equal to the July 2009 sales proceeds of these ARS investments. For the remaining ARS investments not sold, the estimated fair value was determined by the Company with the assistance of a third party valuation firm. The ultimate disposition of these remaining ARS may result in recoverable values that are significantly different from the estimates made by management and the Company may be required to recognize impairments. During the second quarter 2009, the Company recognized a net loss of $1.3 million related to the fair value adjustment for the ARS investments sold during July 2009 and recognized a $0.7 million unrealized gain, in other comprehensive income, related to the ARS investments not disposed of.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a financial instrument. For cash and cash equivalents and investments, the Company's maximum exposure to credit risk represents the carrying amount on the balance sheet. The Company attempts to mitigate credit risk for cash and cash equivalents and investments by placing its funds and
19
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
5. Investments (Continued)
investments with high credit-quality financial institutions, limiting the amount of exposure to each financial institution, monitoring the financial condition of the financial institutions and investing only in government and corporate securities rated "investment grade" or better. The Company invests with financial institutions that maintain a net worth of not less than $1 billion and are members in good standing of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
6. Prepaid expenses and other assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:
|
June 30,
2009 |
|
December
2008 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Current portion of note receivable |
$ | | $ | 2,079 | |||||
Royalty receivable |
128 | | |||||||
Joint venture receivable |
67 | | |||||||
Deferred leasehold costs |
345 | | |||||||
Prepaid insurance |
303 | 3,356 | |||||||
Prepaid legal costs |
171 | | |||||||
Accrued interest on investments |
26 | 236 | |||||||
Prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances |
76 | 7,266 | |||||||
Insurance premium refund receivable |
| 778 | |||||||
Recoupable deposits and other |
196 | 1,835 | |||||||
|
$ | 1,312 | $ | 15,550 | |||||
June 30, 2009
The joint venture receivable is related to amounts due from a joint venture project the Company owns in Peru. Deferred leasehold costs are related to the Company's headquarters office lease in Golden, Colorado. Prepaid legal costs are related to retention amounts paid for legal services and are expected to settle during the third quarter 2009. Prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances consist primarily of advance payments made to contractors and suppliers for exploration related services.
In addition included in non-current assets is approximately $557,000 of prepaid insurance on which amortization will be recognized through 2015.
December 31, 2008
The current portion of notes receivable was related to funds previously advanced by the Company to the contractor that constructed the load out facilities at the Port of Mejillones (see Note 11). Prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances consisted primarily of advance payments made to contractors and suppliers for mining and processing supplies and services at the San Cristóbal mine. Each of these amounts was eliminated in the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo.
20
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
7. Inventories
Inventories at the San Cristóbal mine at December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
December 31, 2008 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
|||
Current Inventories |
||||
Concentrate |
$ | 18,638 | ||
Material and supplies |
56,370 | |||
|
$ | 75,008 | ||
Long Term Stockpile Inventories |
||||
Oxide ore stockpiles |
$ | 72,628 | ||
|
$ | 72,628 | ||
The Company had no inventories at June 30, 2009, as all inventories were associated with the San Cristóbal assets sold (see Notes 2 and 3).
Concentrate inventories at December 31, 2008 consisted of approximately 46,467 tonnes of concentrates and were carried at the lower of cost or market. The long term stockpile inventories consisted of stockpiled ore that will be processed later in the mine life and were carried at the lower of cost or market. Material and supplies inventory consisted primarily of fuel, reagents and operating supplies at the San Cristóbal mine and were carried at the lower of cost or market.
8. Value Added Tax Recoverable
The Company has recorded value added tax ("VAT") paid in Bolivia and related to the San Cristóbal mine as a recoverable asset. At June 30, 2009, the Company had no recoverable VAT as all recoverable VAT was associated with the San Cristóbal assets sold (see Notes 2 and 3). At December 31, 2008 the VAT recoverable amount was $157.1 million and included $19.5 million of recoverable Bolivian import duties.
The Company has also paid VAT in Bolivia as well as other countries, primarily related to exploration activities, which is charged to expense as incurred because of the uncertainty of recoverability.
21
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
9. Property, Plant and Equipment and assets held for sale
Property, plant and equipment
The components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
||||||
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Mining properties |
$ | | $ | 49,596 | |||||
Exploration properties |
6,232 | | |||||||
Construction in progress |
| 14,782 | |||||||
Buildings & leasehold improvements |
382 | 3,709 | |||||||
Mining equipment and machinery |
1,912 | 123,139 | |||||||
Other furniture and equipment |
661 | 5,128 | |||||||
|
9,187 | 196,354 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(163 | ) | (56,446 | ) | |||||
|
9,024 | 139,908 | |||||||
Equipment under capital lease |
| 72,425 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (21,337 | ) | ||||||
|
| 51,088 | |||||||
Port facilities under lease |
| 12,283 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (745 | ) | ||||||
|
| 11,538 | |||||||
|
$ | 9,024 | $ | 202,534 | |||||
The increase in exploration properties is the result of recording certain of the Company's exploration properties at fair market value per the requirements of fresh start accounting as discussed in Note 2.
Property, plant and equipment with a net book value of $187.4 million were included in the net assets and liabilities sold with the San Cristóbal mine on March 24, 2009.
During the second quarter 2009, the Company sold an office building it owned in La Paz, Bolivia for $650,000 and recorded a loss on the sale of $180,000 plus tax expense related to the transaction of $33,000. The Company received an upfront cash payment of $600,000 and will receive the remaining $50,000 upon final closing during the third quarter 2009.
Assets held for sale
At June 30, 2009 the company had obtained approval from the Company's board of directors to sell an exploration property it holds in Bolivia with a carrying value of $2.5 million and a property it holds in Mexico with a carrying value of $0.6 million. The property in Bolivia is subject to a joint venture arrangement with a third party that is currently earning a majority operating interest by funding certain exploration and operations feasibility work. The property in Mexico consists of a few
22
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
9. Property, Plant and Equipment and assets held for sale (Continued)
mining concessions located on the southern edge of the Zacatecas district, outside of the Company's targeted exploration program in the area. The Company is currently negotiating with potential buyers for both properties. At June 30, 2009 the $3.1 million carrying value of the two properties were recorded as assets held for sale.
10. Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
The Company's accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
||||||
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accruals |
$ | 2,400 | $ | 27,502 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
| 3,227 | |||||||
Amounts due smelters |
| 7,974 | |||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 1,764 | |||||||
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
1,192 | 8,394 | |||||||
|
$ | 3,592 | $ | 48,861 | |||||
Accrued employee compensation and benefits at June 30, 2009 consist of $0.4 million of accrued performance bonuses payable, $0.2 million of accrued vacation payable and $0.6 million related to withholding taxes and benefits payable.
11. Debt
The Company's debt at December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
Current | Long-term | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||
2.875% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2024 |
$ | 180,000 | $ | | |||
4.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2024 |
109,987 | | |||||
Project finance facility |
225,000 | | |||||
Note assigned to Sumitomo |
| 9,060 | |||||
Capital leases |
8,307 | 39,549 | |||||
Port lease liability |
316 | 11,342 | |||||
|
$ | 523,610 | $ | 59,951 | |||
Subsequent to December 31, 2008 all of the Company's debt was sold or extinguished as a result of the sale of the net assets and liabilities of the San Cristóbal mine and Chapter 11 reorganization (see Note 2).
2.875% Notes and 4.0% Notes
Under the Plan, holders of the Notes received a pro rata distribution of (i) 2,987,735 shares of the Company's common stock and (ii) approximately $45.0 million of cash in exchange for the cancellation
23
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
11. Debt (Continued)
of the Notes. An additional 12,265 shares were reserved for issuance to holders of unsecured claims of ASML, and any such shares that are not issued the holders of such claims will be issued to the Note holders on a pro rata basis. To record the effect of the reorganization, ASML wrote off the $290.0 million liability related to the Notes plus $3.2 million of accumulated interest and recorded a $248.2 million gain at March 24, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the Company had no further obligations related to the Notes, other than the possible issuance of the additional shares noted above. Had ASML not been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy between January 12, 2009 and the Effective Date, the Notes would have accrued an additional $1.9 million of interest.
San Cristóbal Project Finance Facility
On December 17, 2008, Sumitomo purchased 90% of the loans under the San Cristóbal Project Finance Facility (the "Facility") from the senior lenders. ASML's guarantee and other obligations to Sumitomo with respect to the 90% of the facility owned by Sumitomo were terminated as part of the Plan and the sale of the San Cristóbal mine. The remaining 10% of the Facility held by the senior lenders was canceled in connection with the Company's emergence from bankruptcy under the Plan. The Predecessor (ASML) recognized a $22.5 million gain on the termination of its obligations related to the Facility and recorded the gain as a reduction of the loss on the sale of interest in subsidiaries as the Facility was the primary obligation of MSC. At June 30, 2009, the Company had no further obligations related to the Facility.
The Company segregates cash that is restricted by contractual agreement, and reports these amounts separately in the financial statements. At December 31, 2008 the Company reported as current restricted cash $20.6 million that was restricted to provide operating capital for the San Cristóbal mine and the payment of the Facility principal and interest.
Sumitomo Note Assignment
During 2006 and 2007 ASML loaned funds to San Cristóbal Transportadad de Eletricidad S.A. ("SC TESA"), the contractor that constructed the power line for the San Cristóbal mine, and received a promissory note from SC TESA in the amount of $21.2 million. In connection with the September 2006 sale of 35% of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo, ASML sold 35% of this note to Sumitomo. At December 31, 2008 the Company had recorded a note payable to Sumitomo in the amount of $9.1 million, which includes accrued interest, as a result of the assignment of the 35% interest in the SC TESA promissory note. In connection with the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo, the remaining amount of the SC TESA note receivable was sold to Sumitomo and the note payable to Sumitomo was terminated. At June 30, 2009, the Company had no further obligations related to the note assignment.
Capital Leases
Certain mining equipment used by the contractor that provides mining services for the San Cristóbal mine has been recorded as capital leases because the equipment is used exclusively at the San Cristóbal mine. At December 31, 2008 ASML had recorded on its balance sheet $51.1 million of equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, and a capital lease obligation of $47.9 million related to the leased equipment. Following the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo, the Company
24
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
11. Debt (Continued)
retained no interest in the mining contract or equipment. At June 30, 2009 the Company had no capital lease obligations.
Port Lease Liability
Certain assets were constructed at the Port of Mejillones for the exclusive use of the San Cristóbal mine, including concentrate reception, unloading and storage facilities. ASML determined that a leasing arrangement exists with respect to those assets. As of December 31, 2008 ASML had recorded on its balance sheet $11.5 million of plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, and a financing obligation of $11.7 million related to the port facility. Following the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo, the Company retained no interest in the contracts or other rights or obligations related to the port.
Sumitomo Working Capital Line of Credit
During 2008, Sumitomo provided $150.0 million in funding to the San Cristóbal mine under a working capital credit line to augment cash flow from concentrate sales in order to fund San Cristóbal's operating costs, income and other taxes, capital costs and financing costs. All obligations of the Company with respect to the Sumitomo working capital line of credit were terminated with the sale of the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo and at June 30, 2009 the Company had no obligations related to the working capital line of credit.
12. Asset Retirement Obligations
ASML had developed an asset retirement plan for the San Cristóbal mine which included estimated reclamation, remediation and closure requirements based on Bolivian government requirements, World Bank financing requirements and the Company's policies.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balance for ASML's asset retirement obligations:
|
The Period
Ended March 24, 2009 |
Year Ended
December 31, 2008 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 9,155 | $ | 6,981 | ||||
ARO arising in the period |
288 |
1,380 |
||||||
Changes in estimates, and other |
| | ||||||
Liabilities settled |
| | ||||||
Accretion expense |
232 | 794 | ||||||
Obligation assumed in sale of MSC |
(9,675 | ) | | |||||
Ending balance |
$ | | $ | 9,155 | ||||
All asset retirement obligations of the Company were terminated in connection with the sale of the San Cristóbal mine. At June 30, 2009 the Company had no asset retirement obligations related to the San Cristóbal mine or any of its exploration properties.
25
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
13. Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008 the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements", ("FAS No. 157") for the financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring (annual) basis. FAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in the form of a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Further, financial assets and liabilities should be classified by level in their entirety based upon the lowest level of input that was significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy per FAS No. 157 are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
Level 2: Quoted prices in inactive markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or other observable inputs either directly related to the asset or liability or derived principally from corroborated observable market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs due to the fact that there is little or no market activity. This entails using assumptions in models which estimate what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The following table summarizes the Company's financial assets at fair value at June 30, 2009, by respective level of the fair value hierarchy:
|
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 12,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 12,000 | ||||||
Short-term available for sale securities |
226 | | | 226 | ||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
| 2,498 | 2,108 | 4,606 | ||||||||||
|
$ | 12,226 | $ | 2,498 | $ | 2,108 | $ | 16,832 | ||||||
The Company's cash equivalents, comprised principally of time deposits, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company's short-term available for sale securities are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. These securities are comprised of common stock, which have been valued using quoted prices in active markets.
Certain of the Company's ARS are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these securities was determined equal to the proceeds the Company received during July 2009 for the sale of these securities. They represent Level 2 classification since they were sold in an inactive market and represent observable inputs directly attributable to the assets (see Note 20).
Certain of the Company's ARS are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. These securities are valued by the Company, with the assistance of a third party valuation firm. They are valued based upon the estimated present value of expected cash flows using a Monte Carlo simulation
26
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
13. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
model taking into account significant assumptions regarding coupon payments, recovery, and redemption values. The Company uses these significant Level 3 inputs as there is no current market activity for these, or similar, securities nor relevant corroborating market data with readily observable inputs to support a Level 1 or 2 valuation.
The following table summarizes the change in fair value of the Company's Level 3 financial assets (ARS):
|
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands)
|
|||
Beginning balance |
$ | 5,101 | ||
Realized losses |
(2,159 | ) | ||
Unrealized gains |
1,664 | |||
Reclassified to Level 2 |
(2,498 | ) | ||
Ending balance |
$ | 2,108 | ||
14. Income Taxes
The Company, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries file tax returns in the United States and in various foreign jurisdictions. The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. The Company's income tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved. The Company's total unrecognized tax benefits, representing uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns, were $1.4 million and $2.3 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Of these, $1.4 million and $2.3 million resulted in a reduction to the Company's deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As a result of the reorganization, pursuant to the Plan, the Company reduced unrecognized tax benefits by $0.9 million.
For the period March 25 through June 30, 2009, the Company incurred operating losses, and recognized income tax of $0.2 million consisting of $0.4 million withholding tax on management services provided to Bolivia, less $0.2 million tax benefits for losses which offset previously recognized deferred tax liabilities. Based on the limited history of the Company, an estimated effective tax rate is not used to report the year-to-date results. The Predecessor recognized income tax of $0.2 million for the period January through March 24, 2009 also due to Bolivia withholding tax on management services, and income tax of $2.5 million is included in discontinued operations for the same period in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Predecessor recognized income tax of $1.6 million for Bolivia withholding tax, and income tax of $20.2 million is included in discontinued operations.
As part of the Plan, the Company received the remaining assets of the predecessor company, which include investments in subsidiaries, some of which are disregarded for U.S. tax purposes. The US tax basis of the assets received is limited to the fair value placed on them for fresh start purposes. A deferred tax liability of $0.5 million was recognized for fresh start purposes for assets whose fresh
27
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
14. Income Taxes (Continued)
start value exceeded the tax basis. Deferred tax liabilities were reduced to $0.3 million as of June 30, 2009, as the result of the recognition of $0.2 million of deferred tax benefits resulting from losses incurred during the period.
15. Shareholders' Equity
Equity Incentive Plans The Predecessor had established stock plans to issue share options and other share awards to officers, directors, employees, consultants and agents of the Predecessor and its subsidiaries (the "Stock Plans").
The Predecessor recognized stock-based compensation costs using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award. The Predecessor recognized stock-based compensation costs of $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the 83 day period ended March 24, 2009 and the three month period ended March 31, 2008, respectively.
As discussed in Note 2, the Predecessor's equity holders received no recovery under the Plan following emergence from Chapter 11. As such, the following shares underlying awards granted under the Stock Plans were cancelled and the holders of grants under the Stock Plans have no further rights or recovery: approximately 2.5 million stock option grants to employees and directors, with an average exercise price of $14.83; 211,975 restricted share grants to employees, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $15.22 per share; and 55,549 restricted stock units granted to directors, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $11.70 per unit. Per the guidance of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, "Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment" ("FAS No. 123R"), ASML recognized $2.4 million of compensation expense related to the stock options, restricted share grants and restricted stock unit grants cancelled. The compensation expense recognized was the unrecognized grant date fair value of the options and grants remaining at the date of cancellation. In addition, 350,000 warrants, held by third parties, to purchase Ordinary Shares at a price of $20.79 per Ordinary Share were cancelled.
On April 3, 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plan") and the Company's board of directors granted 270,000 shares of restricted common stock to the Company's executive officers and employees pursuant to the Equity Plan. One-half of the shares awarded will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and one-half will vest on the second anniversary of the grant date, provided that the officer or employee is employed by or continues to serve the Company on the applicable vesting date.
28
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
15. Shareholders' Equity (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Company's restricted stock grants issued under the Equity Plan at June 30, 2009 and changes during the period April 3, 2009 through June 30, 2009:
Restricted Stock Grants
|
Number of
Shares |
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at beginning of the period |
| $ | | ||||
Granted during period |
270,000 | 10.92 | |||||
Restrictions lifted during the period |
| | |||||
Forfeited during period |
| | |||||
Outstanding at end of the period |
270,000 | 10.92 | |||||
As the Company's shares were not yet listed and publicly traded at the time of the restricted stock grants, the grant date fair value was calculated by dividing the total shares of common stock available under the Joint Plan of Reorganization by the net fair value of the reorganized company following the principles of SOP 90-7 and FAS 141R (see Note 2). For the quarter ended June 30, 2009 the Company recognized $0.5 million of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants and expects to recognize additional compensation expense of approximately $2.3 million over the next 1.8 year period.
Also, pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company's board of directors adopted the Non-Employee Director's Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan (the "Deferred Compensation Plan"). Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan the directors will receive a portion of their compensation in the form of Restricted Stock Units ("RSU") issued under the Equity Plan. The Restricted Stock Units typically vest one year after the date of grant so long as the individual is still serving as a director. Each Restricted Stock Unit entitles the director to receive one unrestricted share of common stock for each vested Restricted Stock Unit upon the termination of the director's board service. The non-employee directors were granted 25,000 RSU, with a grant date of April 3, 2009.
A summary of the status of the RSU grants issued under the Deferred Compensation Plan at June 30, 2009 and changes during the period April 3, 2009 through June 30, 2009:
Restricted Stock Units
|
Number of
Underlying Shares |
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at beginning of the period |
| $ | | ||||
Granted during period |
25,000 | 10.92 | |||||
Restrictions lifted during the period |
| | |||||
Forfeited during period |
| | |||||
Outstanding at end of the period |
25,000 | 10.92 | |||||
As the Company's shares were not yet listed and publicly traded at the time of the RSU grants, the grant date fair value was calculated by dividing the total shares of common stock available under the Joint Plan of Reorganization by the net fair value of the reorganized company following the principles of SOP 90-7 and FAS 141R (see Note 2). For the quarter ended June 30, 2009 the Company
29
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
15. Shareholders' Equity (Continued)
recognized $0.1 million of compensation expense related to the RSU grants and expects to recognize additional compensation expense of approximately $0.2 million over the next nine month period.
16. Non-controlling Interest
On January 1, 2009 the Company adopted FAS No. 160 related to non-controlling interest, previously called a minority interest. A non-controlling interest is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The objective of this Standard is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards related to non-controlling interests. The Company applied the provisions of FAS No. 160 prospectively, except for the provisions related to the presentation of non-controlling interests, which have been applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Upon adoption of FAS No. 160, non-controlling interests of approximately $150.8 million as of December 31, 2008 were recast to a component of total equity in the consolidated balance sheet.
At June 30, 2009 the Company does not participate in any business arrangements that require the reporting of a non-controlling interest pursuant to FAS No. 160.
The following schedule sets forth the amounts of income from continuing operations and discontinued operations attributable to the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For The Period
March 25, 2009 Through June 30, 2009 |
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|||||||||
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
||||||||||||
Amounts attributable to Golden Mineral common stockholders and Predecessor's ordinary shareholders: |
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | (7,174 | ) | $ | 243,621 | $ | (27,980 | ) | |||||
Discontinued operations |
| (12,022 | ) | 231,241 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (7,174 | ) | $ | 231,599 | $ | 203,261 | ||||||
Sumitomo Corporation
The Predecessor consolidated 100% of the accounts of the San Cristóbal mine and recorded Sumitomo's 35% non-controlling interest in the gains or losses of the San Cristóbal mine and its subsidiaries for the period reported. In addition, the Predecessor recorded certain advances and loan proceeds from Sumitomo and interest due Sumitomo to non-controlling interest.
Net income attributable to the Predecessor for the period January 1, 2009 through March 24, 2009 includes $7.9 million of non-controlling interest expense related to Sumitomo's interest in the San Cristóbal mine earnings during that period (see Note 3).
At June 30, 2009, subsequent to the sale of the San Cristóbal mine, the Company has no non-controlling interest related to Sumitomo recorded on its books.
30
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
16. Non-controlling Interest (Continued)
SC TESA
During 2005 the Predecessor entered into a long-term contract with SC TESA to construct a power line and transport power to the San Cristóbal mine from the Bolivian power grid. In accordance with the guidance of FASB Interpretation No. 46R, "Variable Interest Entities," Predecessor fully consolidated the accounts of SC TESA for financial reporting purposes. Because SC TESA was consolidated for financial reporting purposes, the intercompany profit earned by SC TESA was eliminated and the Company recognized a non-controlling interest offset to SC TESA's earnings or loss.
Loss from discontinued operations for the period January 1, 2009 through March 24, 2009, includes $0.3 million of non-controlling interest expense related to SC TESA's intercompany profit (see Note 3).
At June 30, 2009, subsequent to the sale of the San Cristóbal mine, the Company has no non-controlling interest related to SC TESA recorded on its books.
17. Revenue and Cost of Services
On the Effective Date, the Company entered into the Management Agreement under which it provides certain management services with respect to the San Cristóbal mine. The Management Agreement provides for an annual fee of $9.5 million. The Company expects that approximately $3.5 million of the fee paid for 2009 will constitute reimbursement for direct administrative expenses the Company incurs on behalf of the San Cristóbal mine. The Company may also earn a potential annual incentive fee of up to $1.5 million, which would not be determined or paid until 2010. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company will receive the fee and any reimbursements net of any Bolivian withholding taxes. The fee and reimbursements for administrative costs and Bolivian withholding taxes are reported as "Revenue from Services" in the statement of operations following the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force 01-14 "Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for "Out-of-Pocket" Expenses Incurred", ("EITF 01-14") and Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19 "Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent", ("EITF 99-19"), both of which support recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses in situations where the recipient is the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense. The actual costs incurred for the reimbursed administrative costs and other direct expenses will be reported as costs of services in the statement of operations. Reimbursed Bolivian withholding taxes will be reported as income taxes in the statement of operations. Prior to entering into the Management Agreement, ASML received a management fee of $450,000 per month from San Cristóbal to cover certain costs incurred directly by ASML.
For the period March 25, 2009 through June 30, 2009 the Company had recorded $3.4 million as revenue related to the Management Agreement, comprised of $3.0 million of fees (which included reimbursement for direct administrative expenses of $1.4 million) and $0.4 million for reimbursed withholding taxes. The Company also recorded corresponding charges of $1.1 million to cost of services and $0.4 million to income taxes for the actual administrative costs and withholding taxes reimbursable under the Management Agreement.
31
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
18. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company concluded, based on the results of an internal investigation conducted under the direction of its Audit Committee in late 2005 and early 2006, that certain former senior employees were involved in making impermissible payments of approximately $125,000 to government officials in 2003 and 2004 in connection with an inactive, early stage exploration property that is not related to any of the Company's current or former active exploration or operating properties. Based on findings to date, no changes to the Company's previously filed financial statements are warranted as a result of these matters. The Company contacted the Department of Justice ("DOJ") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") during 2006 and reported the results of the internal investigation. The Company was informed that the SEC and DOJ commenced investigations with respect to these matters, including possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. On January 7, 2009, the Company received a "Wells notice" from the staff of the SEC (the "Staff"), which stated that the Staff intended to recommend to the SEC that an enforcement action be commenced against the Company, alleging that the Company violated Sections 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), 13(b)(5) and 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). The Wells notice further stated that the Staff may seek permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil money penalties against the Company. The Company has submitted a Wells Statement putting forth reasons that the SEC should not institute civil enforcement proceedings against it.
The Company has learned that the Staff also issued Wells notices to individuals who served as Chief Financial Officer and executive Chairman of the Board of the Predecessor during the period of the alleged illegal payments. A Wells notice indicates that the Staff believes there may be sufficient evidence of a potential violation of the federal securities laws to consider making a recommendation to the SEC commissioners that civil enforcement proceedings should be instituted.
Subsequently, the Company entered into discussions with the Staff concerning a settlement of the conduct subject to the SEC's investigation. As a result, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the staff which, if approved by the Commission, would resolve this matter with the SEC. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the Company, on neither an admit nor deny basis, would agree to the entry of an administrative cease and desist order prohibiting the Company from future violations of Sections 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 30A of the Exchange Act. Moreover, under the terms of the proposed settlement, the SEC staff would not recommend that the Commission require the payment of disgorgement, civil money penalties, prejudgment interest or the appointment of a corporate monitor. The proposed settlement is subject to Commission approval, negotiation of the terms of the settlement papers and approval by the Company's Board of Directors. The Company cannot guarantee that the Commission will ultimately accept the terms of the proposed settlement.
The Company is cooperating fully with the SEC and DOJ investigations. The Company cannot predict with any certainty the final outcome of the DOJ's investigation, including any fines or penalties that may be imposed. Moreover, absent the Commission's approval of the proposed settlement, the Company cannot predict with any certainty the final outcome of the SEC's investigation, including any fines or penalties that may be imposed.
32
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
19. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table reconciles net income (loss) for the period to cash from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For The Period
March 25, 2009 Through June 30, 2009 |
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests |
$ | (7,174 | ) | $ | 239,468 | $ | 238,391 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||
Amortization and depreciation |
152 | 10,977 | 18,735 | |||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
| | 2,248 | |||||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
| 232 | 366 | |||||||||||
Amortization of premiums and discounts |
| 37 | (229 | ) | ||||||||||
Mark-to-market (gain) loss on derivative positions |
| 36 | (195,638 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
180 | | | |||||||||||
Loss on auction rate security investments |
1,332 | 828 | 3,100 | |||||||||||
Gain on extingushment of debt |
| (248,165 | ) | | ||||||||||
(Gian) loss on sale of interest in subsidiary |
| 8,409 | (63,071 | ) | ||||||||||
Fresh start accounting adjustment |
| (9,122 | ) | |||||||||||
Stock compensation |
609 | 2,920 | 2,049 | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts receivable |
(98 | ) | (11,893 | ) | 1,911 | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
126 | 84 | 240 | |||||||||||
Port fees applied to Port of Mejillones note receivable |
| 709 | 1,382 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in prepaid expenses and other assets |
(427 | ) | 6,063 | 1,896 | ||||||||||
Increase in inventories |
| (12,000 | ) | (61,534 | ) | |||||||||
Increase in value added tax recoverable, net |
| (11,696 | ) | (32,426 | ) | |||||||||
Increase in accrued interest payable |
| 11,496 | 5,618 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue |
| (3,227 | ) | 52,667 | ||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities net of amounts capitalized |
(5,017 | ) | 2,462 | 37,811 | ||||||||||
Increase in deferred leasehold payments |
369 | | | |||||||||||
Decrease in deferred taxes, net |
(193 | ) | (2,262 | ) | (3,492 | ) | ||||||||
Other increase (decrease) |
3 | 795 | 2,105 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (10,138 | ) | $ | (13,849 | ) | $ | 12,129 | ||||||
33
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
19. Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Continued)
The following table sets forth supplemental cash flow information and non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For The Period
March 25, 2009 Through June 30, 2009 |
|
For The Period
January 1, 2009 Through March 24, 2009 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|||||||||
|
(Successor)
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|||||||||||
Supplemental disclosure: |
|||||||||||||
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | | $ | | $ | 17,224 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: |
|||||||||||||
Initial measurement of asset retirement obligation |
$ | | $ | 288 | $ | 959 | |||||||
Equipment acquired through capital lease |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,283 |
20. Subsequent Events
Toronto Stock Exchange Listing
The Company's common stock commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") at the opening of the market on Thursday, July 16, 2009 under the ticker symbol "AUM".
Sale of ARS Investments
On July 23, 2009, the Company completed the disposition of certain of its ARS investments through two brokerage firms. The Company received approximately $2.5 million in exchange for the securities, which had a carrying value of approximately $2.5 million at March 31, 2009, which was net of an impairment loss of approximately $1.3 million which the Company recorded during the second quarter 2009.
Subsequent events were evaluated by the Company as of August 7, 2009, the date at which the Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.
34
Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
Golden Minerals Company ("Golden" or "we") is the successor to Apex Silver Mines Limited ("ASML") for purposes of reporting under U.S. federal securities laws. References in this discussion and analysis to "Successor" refer to Golden and its subsidiaries on or after March 25, 2009, after emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings ("Chapter 11"), as more fully described in footnote 2 to the consolidated financial statements. References to "Predecessor" refer to ASML and its subsidiaries prior to March 25, 2009. Since the emergence from Chapter 11 on March 24, 2009 (the "Effective Date"), the Chapter 11 proceeding have generally involved the reconciliation of claims. As of the date hereof, we have resolved substantially all Chapter 11 claims, and we expect to seek final closing of the Chapter 11 proceeding following the resolution of remaining claims. In addition, we expect to seek finalization of the ASML liquidation proceeding that is now pending in the Cayman Islands including cancellation of the ASML ordinary shares.
The following discussion and analysis summarizes the results of operations of the Predecessor for the 83 day period ended March 24, 2009 and Golden for the 98 day period ended June 30, 2009, respectively and Golden for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and changes in our financial condition from December 31, 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis included in ASML's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Overview
Our operations have changed substantially as a result of the sale of our interests in the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo in connection with our emergence from Chapter 11 (see Note 2 to the financial statements). We are primarily engaged in the exploration and advancement of our portfolio of exploration properties located primarily in South America and Mexico and in managing the San Cristóbal mine for Sumitomo. Our common stock commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") on July 16, 2009 under the ticker symbol "AUM".
As part of the San Cristóbal sale, we entered into the Management Services Agreement under which we provide certain operations management services with respect to the San Cristóbal mine. Operations at the San Cristóbal mine generated positive operating cash flow for the period and achieved average concentrator throughput of 42,920 tonnes per day, exceeding the 40,000 tonnes per day designed capacity. Zinc concentrate production during the period was approximately 125,900 tonnes and lead concentrate production during the period was approximately 26,000 tonnes. Payable metal production from the San Cristóbal mine during the period totaled approximately 4.3 million ounces of silver, 62,300 tonnes of zinc and 17,100 tonnes of lead.
During the current period, we continued to evaluate our exploration properties, including additional drilling on our El Quevar silver project in northwestern Argentina, where we drilled an additional 53 holes totaling approximately 5,100 meters. These holes were primarily designed to provide additional intercepts within the original drill pattern, which was spaced about 50 meters apart. This new drilling will provide intercepts spaced 25 to 30 meters apart and give us more information about the continuity and grade of the known mineralization. This drill program also tested extensions to the east and west of our main mineralized zone. Results confirm that the zone extends at least 450 meters further west and 350 meters east of the previously defined 750 meters long central zone, and is still open in both directions. We will update the mineral resource in the next quarter and have initiated engineering studies in support of a preliminary economic assessment for the project.
35
Our field work at El Quevar has now identified fourteen target areas believed to have potential for the discovery of additional silver mineralization. The more promising of these areas will be the focus of drill testing in the coming months.
We continue to advance our field evaluations of certain of our more interesting prospects in preparation for possible drill testing later in the year. Among these prospects are the high-grade vein targets in the Zacatecas district of central Mexico, where we have identified four areas that contain significant silver and base metal values in quartz veins and as disseminations in sedimentary rocks. In Peru, we have developed another potential high-grade vein target at our Palca project in southern Peru, where at least four veins exhibit silver values greater than 100 g/t with associated lead, zinc and gold values.
During the second quarter 2009, we sold a building we owned in La Paz, Bolivia for $650,000 and recorded a loss on the sale of $180,000 plus tax expense related to the transaction of $33,000. We received an upfront cash payment of $600,000 and will receive the remaining $50,000 upon final closing during the third quarter 2009. On July 23, 2009, we completed the disposition of certain of our ARS investments through two brokerage firms. We received approximately $2.5 million in exchange for the securities, which had a carrying value of approximately $3.8 million at March 31, 2009 and recognized a net loss of $1.3 million during the second quarter 2009 as a fair value adjustment for the ARS investments sold. As of June 30, 2009 our board of directors had approved the sale of an exploration property we hold in Bolivia with a carrying value of $2.5 million and a property we hold in Mexico with a carrying value of $0.6 million. The property in Bolivia is subject to a joint venture arrangement with a third party that is currently earning a majority operating interest by funding certain exploration and operations feasibility work. The property in Mexico consists of a few mining concessions located on the southern edge of the Zacatecas district, outside of our targeted exploration program in the area. We are currently negotiating with potential buyers for both properties. At June 30, 2009 the carrying value of the two properties was recorded as assets held for sale.
Results of Operations
For the results of continuing operations discussed below, we compare (i) the second quarter 2009 results from continuing operations of the Successor to the second quarter 2008 results of continuing operations of the Predecessor and, (ii) the results of continuing operations of the Predecessor for the 83-day period ended March 24, 2009 and the results of continuing operations of the Successor for the 98-day period ended June 30, 2009 to the results of continuing operations of the Predecessor for the six month period ended June 30, 2008. The results of operations of the San Cristóbal mine and related subsidiaries that were sold during the first quarter 2009 are aggregated and presented as discontinued operations of the predecessor for the second quarter 2008, the six month period ended June 30, 2008 and the 83-day period ended March 24, 2009. The Successor does not report discontinued operations.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Continuing Operations
Management service fees. We recorded $3.1 million of management service fees for the second quarter 2009. The management service fees are related to the Management Agreement and are comprised of $2.7 million of fees (which included reimbursement for direct administrative expenses of $1.2 million) and $0.4 million for reimbursed withholding taxes. Management service fees for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $1.4 million and were all related to fees received by the Predecessor from a subsidiary included in discontinued operations.
Cost of services. We recorded $1.0 million of costs of services for the second quarter 2009. The cost of services is comprised of reimbursed out-of-pocket costs incurred by us related to the Management Agreement. The Predecessor recorded no cost of services for the second quarter 2008.
36
Exploration. Our exploration expenses, including property holding costs and allocated administrative expenses, were $3.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $9.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Exploration expenses were incurred primarily at El Quevar in Argentina and in Mexico and Peru and include property holding costs and costs incurred by the local exploration offices. None of the exploration expenses reported relate to San Cristóbal.
Administrative and reorganization. Administrative expenses were $3.0 million and $3.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and the quarter ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Administrative expenses, including public company costs, are incurred primarily by our corporate activities in support of our exploration program and our management services for the San Cristóbal mine. Reorganization expenses consisting primarily of legal and accounting fees related to our chapter 11 proceedings totaled $0.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. We did not incur any reorganization expenses during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Loss on Auction Rate Securities. We recorded losses of $1.3 million and $3.1 million related to our auction rate securities ("ARS") investments for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The auctions for certain of our ARS began to fail during the third quarter of 2007 and continued to fail through June 30, 2009. The markets for the ARS have continued to deteriorate resulting in the recording of additional impairment charges. At June 30, 2009, the carrying value of our ARS was $4.6 million. At the end of July, 2009 we sold certain of our remaining ARS investments in a secondary market. We sold ARS with a face value of $41.5 million, and an impaired book value as of June 30, 2009 of $2.5 million, for $2.5 million.
Interest and Other Income. We recorded interest and other income of $0.2 million and $1.7 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. We held lower average cash and investment balances during 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, which resulted in lower interest being earned. In addition, interest rates were lower during 2009 as compared to the preceding years.
Royalty Income. During the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, we recorded a receivable of $0.1 million and received $0.2 million, respectively, of royalty income from the Platosa property in Mexico on which we retained a net smelter return royalty. We believe that the 2009 quarterly payments have been withheld by Excellon pending completion of discussions regarding funding of certain expenses pursuant to a joint venture on a separate contiguous property.
Interest and Other Expense. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we held no debt and consequently we did not record any interest or other expense for the period. For the quarters ended June 30, 2008, we recorded interest and other expense in the amount of $2.6 million which was primarily related to interest incurred on our convertible notes. We ceased accruing interest on the convertible notes following our filing for protection under Chapter 11 on January 12, 2009 and the convertible notes were cancelled on March 24, 2009 in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy. The convertible notes were outstanding during the full quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Income Taxes. We are subject to U.S. income taxes on income derived from services provided to the San Cristóbal mine. Otherwise, we do not currently conduct business in the U.S. that would generate significant U.S. taxable income. Our income tax provisions were $0.2 and $0.1 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and the quarter ended June 30, 2008, respectively and consists of withholding taxes either accrued or paid to Bolivia in connection with management services provided to the San Cristóbal mine.
37
Discontinued OperationsSan Cristóbal.
The aggregated results of the discontinued operations related to the San Cristóbal mine totaled a $256.2 million gain for the second quarter 2008. The gain was primarily the result of a $223.5 million mark-to-market gain related to the Predecessor's open metal derivative positions, a $63.1 million gain on certain deferred payments sold to Sumitomo, partially offset by an $18.5 net loss from operations and $11.8 million of net interest and financing expense. The Successor does not report discontinued operations.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Continuing Operations
Management service fees. We recorded $4.7 million of management service fee income ($3.4 million and $1.3 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Successor's $3.4 million of revenue is related to the Management Agreement and is comprised of $3.0 million of fees (which included reimbursement for direct administrative expenses of $1.4 million) and $0.4 million for reimbursed withholding taxes. The Predecessors $1.3 million of managements service fees is all related to fees received by the Predecessor from a subsidiary included in discontinued operations. Management service fees for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $2.7 million and were all related to fees received by the Predecessor from a subsidiary included in discontinued operations.
Cost of services. We recorded $1.1 million of costs of services (all related to the Successor) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The cost of services is comprised of reimbursed out-of-pocket costs incurred by us related to the Management Agreement. The Predecessor recorded no cost of services for the six month period ended June 30, 2008.
Exploration. Our exploration expenses, including property holding costs and allocated administrative expenses, totaled $7.0 million ($3.5 million and $3.5 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $15.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Exploration expenses were incurred primarily at El Quevar in Argentina and in Mexico and Peru and include property holding costs and costs incurred by the local exploration offices. None of the exploration expenses reported relate to San Cristóbal.
Administrative and reorganization. Administrative expenses totaled $8.1 ($3.3 million and $4.8 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Administrative expenses, including public company costs, are incurred primarily by our corporate activities in support of our exploration program and our management services for the San Cristóbal mine. Reorganization expenses were $0.7 million and $3.7 million for the Successor's results and Predecessor's results for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The reorganization expenses relate to expenses for professional services incurred as a result of our bankruptcy filing and the sale of our interest in the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo. We incurred no reorganization expense during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Loss on Auction Rate Securities. Loss on ARS investments totaled $2.1 million ($1.3 million and $0.8 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The auctions for certain of our ARS began to fail during the third quarter of 2007 and continued to fail through June 30, 2009. The markets for the ARS have continued to deteriorate resulting in the recording of additional impairment charges. At June 30, 2009, the carrying value of our ARS was $4.6 million. At the end of July, 2009 we sold certain of our remaining ARS investments in a secondary market. We sold ARS with
38
a face value of $41.5 million, and an impaired book value as of June 30, 2009 of $2.5 million, for $2.5 million.
Interest and Other Income. We recorded interest and other income of $1.3 million ($0.3 million and $1.0 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We held lower average cash and investment balances during 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, which resulted in lower interest being earned. In addition, interest rates were lower during 2009 as compared to the preceding years.
Royalty Income. We recorded royalty income from the Platosa property in Mexico on which we retained a net smelter return royalty of $0.2 million ($0.1 million and $0.1 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The property is being test mined by a joint venture partner, and we receive a royalty for product sold from the test mining operation. We believe that the two 2009 quarterly payments have been withheld by Excellon pending completion of discussions regarding funding of certain expenses pursuant to a joint venture on a separate contiguous property.
Interest and Other Expense. We recorded interest and other expense of $0.3 million ($0.0 million $0.3 and million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The expense for both periods was primarily the result of interest incurred on our convertible notes. We ceased accruing interest on the convertible notes following our filing for protection under Chapter 11 on January 12, 2009 and the convertible notes were cancelled on March 24, 2009 in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy. The convertible notes were outstanding during the full six month period ended June 30, 2008.
Income Taxes. We are subject to U.S. income taxes on income derived from services provided to the San Cristóbal mine. Otherwise, we do not currently conduct business in the U.S. that would generate significant U.S. taxable income. Our income tax provisions of $0.4 million ($0.2 million and $0.2 million for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively) for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 consist of withholding taxes either accrued or paid to Bolivia in connection with management services provided to the San Cristóbal mine.
Discontinued OperationsSan Cristóbal.
The loss from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of $4.2 million was incurred during the 83-day period ended March 24, 2009 as discontinued operations related to the San Cristóbal asset group were sold at that date. We recognized an $8.4 million loss on the sale of the San Cristóbal asset group which is included in discontinued operations for the period.
The gain from discontinued operations related to the San Cristóbal mine for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 totaled $266.4. The gain was primarily the result of a $195.6 million mark-to-market gain related to the Predecessor's open metal derivative positions, a $63.1 million gain on certain deferred payments sold to Sumitomo, partially offset by a $16.9 net loss from operations and $24.6 million of net interest and financing expense.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern
At June 30, 2009 our aggregate cash and short and long-term investments totaled $20.5 million compared to an aggregate of $76.1 million in cash, restricted cash, short and long-term investments and restricted investments at December 31, 2008. The June 30, 2009 amount includes ARS investments recorded at a fair value of $4.6 million and $15.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. The amounts
39
held at December 31, 2008 included $5.1 million of ARS investments, $20.1 million in cash and cash equivalents restricted for the purpose of funding the San Cristóbal mine and $0.5 million of cash that was restricted to collateralize certain letters of credit.
The decrease in our aggregate cash and investment balances as of June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of the transactions related to our emergence from Chapter 11 In those transactions, on March 24, 2009 we sold our remaining interest in the San Cristóbal mine to Sumitomo for $27.5 million plus a $2.5 million reimbursement of certain prior expenses and we distributed $45.0 million to the holders of the Subordinated Notes in exchange for cancellation of the Subordinated Notes. During the 2009 period, we also spent approximately $20 million in reorganization costs and general and administrative and exploration costs.
The holders of the previous ASML Subordinated Notes are entitled to any cash or cash equivalents held by us at March 31, 2009 in excess of the sum of $15.0 million plus amounts required to pay for accrued liabilities at March 31, 2009 and certain projected reorganization expenses incurred between March 31, 2009 and November 18, 2009. Based on March 31, 2009 cash and investment balances, accruals and estimated additional reorganization expenses through November 18, 2009, we do not anticipate that we will be required to make significant additional cash payments to the holders of the Subordinated Notes.
At the end of July, 2009 we sold certain of our remaining ARS investments in a secondary market. We sold ARS with a face value of $41.5 million, and a book value as of March 31, 2009 of $3.8 million, for $2.5 million. The proceeds are held as cash and cash equivalents. We continue to hold ARS with a face value of $10.5 million and a net book value of $2.1 million as of June 30, 2009. We continue to earn interest on the remaining ARS investments held at a rate of 2.5% over LIBOR.
For the remaining six months of 2009 we expect to spend an additional $1 million on final reorganization costs (including amounts already accrued at June 30, 2009), $5 million on general and administrative costs, and $5 million on advancing our exploration program. We plan to fund these expenditures from our existing cash and investment balances, from the approximately $3 million of net cash flow from our management services agreement with San Cristóbal and from an anticipated $0.5 million of interest and other cash receipts during the period.
During the 12 month period ending June 30, 2010, we expect to spend an additional approximately $1 million on final reorganization costs, $10 million on general and administrative costs, and approximately $10 million on advancing our exploration program. We plan to fund these expenditures from our existing cash and investment balances, from the approximately $6 million of annual net cash flow from our management services agreement with San Cristóbal (comprised of the annual fee net of reimbursed administrative expenses) and from an anticipated $1 million of interest and other cash receipts during the period.
We anticipate that cash on hand, together with interest and other cash receipts and amounts received under the Management Agreement, will provide us with enough cash to continue our exploration program and to pay our general and administrative expenses for at least the next twelve months. As such, the financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business. However, in the longer term, our continuing operations are dependent upon our ability to raise sufficient capital and to generate future profitable operations. For example, we anticipate that an additional $10 to $15 million would be required in 2010 to complete a feasibility study and begin development work at our El Quevar property in Argentina. We expect to require substantial additional capital to complete the development of El Quevar and to pursue our continuing general business strategy beyond the 12 month period. There can be no assurance that the we will be successful in raising additional capital in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Significant Accounting Policies
See Part I, Item 1. Note 4 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of significant accounting policies including recently adopted standards and new accounting standards.
40
Forward-Looking Statements
Some information contained in or incorporated by reference into this report may contain forward-looking statements. These statements include comments regarding:
The use of any of the words "anticipate," "continues," "estimate," "expect," "may," "will," "project," "should," "believe" and similar expressions are intended to identify uncertainties. We believe the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, we cannot assure that these expectations will prove to be correct. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth below and other factors set forth in, or incorporated by reference into this report:
Many of those factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments.
41
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We invest substantially all of our excess cash in U.S. government and debt securities rated "investment grade" or better. The rates received on such investments may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash, restricted cash, investments and restricted investment balances outstanding during the first three months of 2009, a 1% decrease in interest rates would have resulted in a reduction in interest income for the period of approximately $0.1 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Although most of our expenditures are in U.S. dollars, certain purchases of labor, operating supplies and capital assets are denominated in other currencies. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our operations. To reduce this risk, we maintain minimum cash balances in foreign currencies and complete most of our purchases in U.S. dollars.
Commodity Price Risk
One of our primary business activities is the exploration of properties containing silver, zinc, lead and other minerals, As a result, decreases in the price of any of these metals have the potential to negatively impact our ability to establish reserves and develop our exploration properties. None of our properties is in production and we do not currently hold any commodity derivative positions.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2009 (the "Evaluation Date"). Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
42
The Company concluded, based on the results of an internal investigation conducted under the direction of its Audit Committee in late 2005 and early 2006, that certain former senior employees were involved in making impermissible payments of approximately $125,000 to government officials in 2003 and 2004. The Company contacted the Department of Justice ("DOJ") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") during 2006 and reported the results of the internal investigation and was informed that the SEC and DOJ would commence investigations with respect to these matters, including possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Subsequently, the Company entered into discussions with the SEC staff concerning a settlement of the conduct subject to the SEC's investigation. As a result, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the SEC staff which, if approved by the Commission, would resolve this matter with the SEC. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the Company, on neither an admit nor deny basis, would agree to the entry of an administrative cease and desist order prohibiting the Company from future violations of Sections 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 30A of the Exchange Act. Moreover, under the terms of the proposed settlement, the SEC staff would not recommend that the Commission require the payment of disgorgement, civil money penalties, prejudgment interest or the appointment of a corporate monitor. The proposed settlement is subject to Commission approval, negotiation of the terms of the settlement papers and approval by the Company's Board of Directors. The Company cannot guarantee that the Commission will ultimately accept the terms of the proposed settlement.
Risk factors affecting the Company can be found in Item 1A of ASML's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
None.
43
10.1 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. | ||
|
10.2 |
|
Non- Employee Directors Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
32 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act). |
44
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY | ||||
Date: August 7, 2009 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER Jeffrey G. Clevenger President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: August 7, 2009 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ ROBERT P. VOGELS Robert P. Vogels Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
45
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
This Restricted Stock Award Agreement (the " Award Agreement "), is made as of the day of , 20 (the " Grant Date "), between Golden Minerals Company, a Delaware corporation (the " Company "), and (the " Participant ").
RECITAL
The Company desires to encourage and enable the Participant to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through the ownership of the Company's common stock, $0.01 par value (" Common Stock "), pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Golden Minerals Company 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the " Plan ") and this Award Agreement. Such ownership will provide the Participant with a more direct stake in the future of the Company and encourage the Participant to remain with the Company and/or its Affiliates, as applicable.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
1. Grant of Restricted Stock.
1.1 The Company hereby grants to the Participant shares of restricted Common Stock (the " Restricted Shares ") on the terms and conditions set forth in this Award Agreement.
1.2 The Participant's rights with respect to the Restricted Shares shall remain forfeitable at all times prior to the dates set forth below (each a " Lapse Date "):
Number of Shares
|
Lapse Date
|
|
---|---|---|
|
|
|
2. Rights of Participant.
2.1 Except as provided in Section 2.2, Section 6 and otherwise in this Award Agreement, the Participant shall be entitled, at all times on and after the Grant Date, to exercise all rights, powers and privileges of a stockholder with respect to the Restricted Shares (whether or not the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed), other than those Restricted Shares which have been forfeited pursuant to Section 3.3 hereof.
2.2 Prior to the earlier of the applicable Lapse Date or the Accelerated Lapse Date (as defined in Section 3.1), the Participant shall not be entitled to transfer, sell, pledge, encumber, hypothecate or assign any Restricted Shares for which a Lapse Date or Accelerated Lapse Date have not occurred (collectively, the " Transfer Restrictions ").
3. Lapse of Restrictions.
3.1 The Transfer Restrictions and all other restrictions with respect to the Restricted Shares shall lapse, and such Restricted Shares shall become fully nonforfeitable as set forth below:
(a) Provided the Participant continues in Continuous Service from the date hereof until the applicable Lapse Date, on each Lapse Date the number of Restricted Shares set forth in Section 1.2 opposite such Lapse Date shall vest and become fully nonforfeitable;
(b) Provided the Participant continues in Continuous Service from the date hereof until the Accelerated Lapse Date (as defined below), all Restricted Shares granted hereunder shall vest and become fully nonforfeitable on the Accelerated Lapse Date.
3.2 " Accelerated Lapse Date " shall mean the date of termination of Participant's Continuous Service (i) by the Company for reasons other than cause, as determined by the Board in its discretion, (ii) as the result of the Participant's death, Disability or Retirement, or (iii) in anticipation or as the result of a Change in Control as provided in Section 4.
3.3 Upon the termination of the Participant's Continuous Service prior to any Lapse Date, other than a termination which qualifies as an Accelerated Lapse Date, the Restricted Shares with respect to which no Lapse Date has occurred shall be forfeited and automatically transferred to and reacquired by the Company at no cost to the Company, and neither the Participant nor his or her heirs, executors, administrators or successors shall have any right or interest in such Restricted Shares.
4. Change of Control.
4.1 Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Transfer Restrictions and all other restrictions shall lapse with respect to all of the Restricted Shares, all Restricted Shares shall become fully nonforfeitable, and the Board shall have the power and discretion to provide for modification of this award of Restricted Shares in accordance with the Plan. The provisions of this Section 4 shall not apply to any transaction undertaken for the purpose of reincorporating the Company under the laws of another jurisdiction, if such transaction does not materially affect the beneficial ownership of the Company's capital stock.
4.2 For the purpose of the Restricted Shares awarded pursuant to this Agreement, the term " Change of Control " shall mean the first to occur of the following: (A) any person becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 35% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding voting securities (other than (i) the Company, (ii) any subsidiary of the Company, or (iii) one or more employee benefit plans maintained by the Company); (B) three or more Directors of the Company, whose election or nomination for election is not approved by a majority of the applicable Incumbent Board, are elected within any single twelve month period to serve on the Board; (C) members of the applicable Incumbent Board cease to constitute a majority of the Board; (D) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with or into any other corporation or entity or person, or any other corporate reorganization, in which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such consolidation, merger or reorganization own less than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving entity (or its parent) following the consolidation, merger or reorganization or (E) the consummation of a sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. For purposes of this definition, the terms " person " and " beneficial owner " shall have the meanings set forth in Section 13(d) and Rule 13d-3, respectively, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and in the regulations promulgated thereunder. For purposes of this definition, " Incumbent Board " means (i) members of the Board of Directors of the Company as of the date hereof, to the extent that they continue to serve as members of the Board, and (ii) any individual who becomes a member of the Board after the date hereof, if such individual's election or nomination for election as a Director was approved by a vote of at least 75% of the then applicable Incumbent Board.
5. Escrow and Delivery of Shares.
5.1 Certificates representing the Restricted Shares shall be issued in the name of the Participant and held by the Company in escrow and shall remain in the custody of the Company
2
until (i) their delivery to the Participant or his or her estate as set forth in Section 5.2, or (ii) their forfeiture and transfer to the Company as set forth in Section 3.3.
5.2 (a) Subject to Section 5.2(b), certificates representing the Restricted Shares which have become nonforfeitable shall be delivered to the Participant as soon as practicable following each Lapse Date or Accelerated Lapse Date, provided that the Participant has satisfied all applicable tax withholding requirements with respect to the Restricted Shares.
(b) If the Accelerated Lapse Date occurs as a result of the Participant's death, certificates representing the Restricted Shares shall be delivered to the Participant's estate as soon as practicable following the Company's receipt of an official death certificate or other evidence of death acceptable to the Company, provided that the Participant's estate has satisfied all applicable tax withholding requirements with respect to the Restricted Shares.
6. Dividends; Voting Rights.
6.1 All dividends declared and paid by the Company on Restricted Shares shall be held by the Company in escrow for the account of the Participant. Dividends so held shall not bear interest. Upon the earlier of a Lapse Date or the Accelerated Lapse Date, the dividends in respect of the Restricted Shares which have become nonforfeitable shall be paid to the Participant or his or her estate, as the case may be. Upon the forfeiture of the Restricted Shares pursuant to Section 3.3, all related dividends shall also be forfeited.
6.2 The Participant shall not have the right to vote any Restricted Shares until the restrictions have lapsed with respect to such Restricted Shares and such Restricted Shares have become nonforfeitable.
7. No Right to Continued Employment. Nothing in this Award Agreement or the Plan shall be interpreted or construed to confer upon the Participant any right with respect to continued employment by the Company or any of its Affiliates, nor shall this Award Agreement or the Plan interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate the Participant's employment at any time.
8. Adjustments Upon Recapitalization. If, by reason of a recapitalization or other change in corporate or capital structure, the Participant shall be entitled to new, additional or different shares of stock or securities of the Company or any successor Company or entity or other property pursuant to the Plan, such new, additional or different shares or other property shall thereupon be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions which were applicable to the Restricted Shares immediately prior to such recapitalization or other change in corporate or capital structure.
9. Withholding of Taxes.
9.1 The Company shall have the right to require the Participant or the Participant's beneficiaries or legal representatives to remit to the Company an amount equal to the applicable foreign, federal, state and local income taxes and other amounts required by law to be withheld (the " Withholding Taxes "). Whenever payments under the Plan or this Award Agreement are to be made to the Participant in cash, such payments shall be net of any amounts sufficient to satisfy all applicable taxes, including without limitation, all Withholding Taxes concerning such payments. The Board may, in its sole discretion, permit the Participant to satisfy the withholding obligation either by (i) surrendering shares of Common Stock owned by the Participant or (ii) having the Company withhold shares from the Restricted Shares otherwise deliverable to the Participant. Restricted Shares surrendered or withheld shall be valued at their Fair Market Value as of the date on which income is required to be recognized for income tax purposes.
9.2 If the Participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to the grant of Restricted Shares, the grant of the Restricted Shares shall be conditioned upon the
3
prompt payment by the Participant to the Company of Withholding Taxes due in connection with such election. If the Participant does not make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to the grant of Restricted Shares, the Participant shall pay to the Company the Withholding Taxes upon each Lapse Date or the Accelerated Lapse Date. The delivery of the Restricted Shares and related dividends shall be conditioned upon the prior payment of the applicable Withholding Taxes.
10. Modification of Award Agreement. Except as set forth in the Plan and in this Award Agreement, this Award Agreement may be modified, amended, suspended or terminated, and any terms or conditions may be waived, but only by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto.
11. Severability. Should any provision of this Award Agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason, the remaining provisions of this Award Agreement shall not be affected by such holding and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.
12. Governing Law. This Award Agreement and all rights arising hereunder shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.
13. Successors in Interest. This Award Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon any successor to the Company and upon the Participant's heirs, executors, administrators and successors.
14. Interpretation. This Award Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and subject to, the terms of the Plan. For purposes of this Award Agreement, all capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
|
|
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY |
||
|
|
By: |
|
Name: Title: |
|
|
PARTICIPANT |
||
|
|
Name: |
4
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION
AND EQUITY AWARD PLAN
Effective on May 20, 2009
1. Purpose.
(a) Golden Minerals Company (" Golden Minerals ") has established this Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan (the " Plan ").
(b) The purpose of the Plan is to enable members of the Board of Directors (the " Board ") who are not Golden Minerals Employees (" Eligible Directors ") to defer receipt of compensation for their services as Directors of Golden Minerals and to enable Golden Minerals to provide part or all of the compensation for the Board service of Eligible Directors by agreeing to issue to such Eligible Directors shares of Golden Minerals' common stock, par value $0.01 per share (" Shares ").
(c) This Plan has been established pursuant to the Golden Minerals Company 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (" Incentive Plan "), and all rights to acquire Shares and Shares issued pursuant to this Plan constitute awards granted and shares issued under the Incentive Plan.
2. Definitions.
(a) " Code " means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(b) " Committee " means an existing or newly formed committee of two or more Independent Directors appointed by the Board.
(c) " Employee " means any person employed by Golden Minerals or a Subsidiary of Golden Minerals. Service as a director or payment of a director's fee by Golden Minerals or a Subsidiary of Golden Minerals alone shall not be sufficient to constitute "employment" by Golden Minerals or a Subsidiary of Golden Minerals.
(d) " Fair Market Value " means, as of any date, the value of the Shares determined as follows:
(i) If the Shares are listed on any "established securities market", as defined in Treas. Reg. Section 1.897-1(m) or any successor thereto, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the closing sales price for such Share as quoted on such market (or the market with the greatest volume of trading in the Shares if such Shares are traded on more than one market) on the day of determination (or if no sales were reported on such day, on the most recent trading day on which a sales transaction was reported), as reported by such market or such other source as the Board reasonably deems reliable.
(ii) In the absence of such markets for the Shares, the Fair Market Value shall be determined in good faith by the Board using a reasonable valuation method in accordance with Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B) or any successor thereto.
(e) " Independent Director " means (i) a director who satisfies the definition of Independent Director or similar definition under the applicable securities exchange rules and regulations upon which the Shares are traded from time to time, if applicable, and (ii) a director who either (A) is not a current employee of Golden Minerals or an "affiliated corporation" (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code), is not a former employee of Golden Minerals or an "affiliated corporation" receiving compensation for prior services (other than benefits under a tax qualified pension plan), is not an officer of Golden Minerals or an "affiliated corporation" at any time and is not currently receiving direct or indirect remuneration from Golden Minerals or an "affiliated corporation" for services in any capacity other than as a
director or (B) is otherwise considered an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.
(f) " Restricted Stock Unit " means the right to receive one Share credited to the Award Account or the Fee Account in accordance with this Plan.
(g) " Subsidiary " means with respect to any person, a corporation the majority of whose share capital with voting power, under ordinary circumstances, to elect directors is, at the date of determination thereof, directly or indirectly owned by such person, by a Subsidiary of such person, or by such person and one or more Subsidiaries of such person.
3. Administration.
(a) Administration by Board. The Board shall administer the Plan unless and until the Board delegates administration to a Committee. The Board may, at any time and for any reason in its sole discretion, rescind all or any portion of such delegation.
(b) Powers of Board. The Board shall have the power, subject to, and within the limitations of, the express provisions of the Plan:
(i) To construe and interpret the Plan and any agreements issued pursuant to the Plan and to establish, amend and revoke rules and regulations for their administration. The Board, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in the Plan in a manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the Plan fully effective.
(ii) To amend the Plan as provided in Sections 12 and 13.
(iii) To waive in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, with respect to any award pursuant to Section 5 of the Plan, the vesting requirement set forth in Section 5(c) of the Plan, and to permit Restricted Stock Units to vest on an earlier date, including the date of grant.
(iv) Generally, to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as the Board deems necessary or expedient to promote the best interests of Golden Minerals which are not in conflict with the provisions of the Plan.
(c) Delegation to Committee. The Board may delegate administration of the Plan and its powers and duties thereunder to a Committee or Committees, and the term " Committee " shall apply to any person or persons to whom such authority has been delegated. Upon such delegation, the Committee shall have the powers theretofore possessed by the Board, including the power to delegate to a subcommittee any of the administrative powers the Committee is authorized to exercise (and references in this Plan to the Board shall thereafter be deemed to include the Committee or subcommittee), subject, however, to such resolutions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as may be adopted from time to time by the Board. In its absolute discretion, the Board may at any time and from time to time exercise any and all rights and duties of the Committee under this Plan, except respecting matters under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or Section 162(m) of the Code, or any rules or regulations issued thereunder, which are required by such rules or regulations to be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.
(d) Effect of Decision of the Board or a Committee; No Liability. All determinations, interpretations and constructions made by the Board or a Committee in good faith shall not be subject to review by any person and shall be final, binding and conclusive on all persons. No member of the Board or a Committee or any person to whom duties hereunder have been delegated shall be liable for any action, interpretation or determination made in good faith, and such persons shall be entitled to full indemnification and reimbursement consistent with applicable
2
law, in the manner provided in Golden Minerals' Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws as the same may be amended from time to time, or as otherwise provided in any agreement between any such member and Golden Minerals.
4. Maintenance of Records. Golden Minerals shall maintain two bookkeeping accounts for each Eligible Director, an " Award Account " and a " Fee Account ", each of which shall be credited in accordance with the terms of this Plan and the elections of each Eligible Director pursuant to this Plan. Such accounts shall be maintained solely to evidence unfunded obligations of Golden Minerals.
5. Award of Restricted Stock Units.
(a) Discretionary Awards. The Board may, but shall not be required to, authorize the award of Restricted Stock Units to one or more of the Eligible Directors from time to time. At the discretion of the Board, such awards may occur on the date of an Eligible Director's initial election to the Board, on the date of the annual meeting of the Golden Minerals' stockholders, and/or on such other dates or upon the occurrence of such other events as the Board may determine. Upon any award of Restricted Stock Units pursuant to this Plan, the Award Account of such Eligible Director shall be credited with such number of Restricted Stock Units.
(b) Vesting. Restricted Stock Units awarded pursuant to this Section 5 shall vest in the manner determined by the Board with respect to such award.
(c) Voting. Restricted Stock Units shall have no voting rights.
6. Deferral of Fees.
(a) Board Authorization to Defer Cash Fees. The Board may permit any Eligible Director to elect to defer receipt of all or any portion of the cash compensation for services (" Fees ") to be earned by such Eligible Director. In order to permit the deferral of Fees for any calendar year, the Board shall adopt a resolution (the " Deferral Authorization ") no later than the close of the calendar year prior to the calendar year in which any services will be performed with respect to which Fees may be deferred. Any such Deferral Authorization shall permit any Eligible Director to elect to defer receipt of Fees in the manner set forth in Section 6(b) and (c). In the discretion of the Board, the Deferral Authorization may apply to the following calendar year, to multiple future years or to all future years, and may apply to all Fees earned or to only certain Fees earned during such period, in each case, as set forth in the Deferral Authorization, subject to the Board's authority to rescind or modify a Deferral Authorization for any calendar year prior to the commencement of such calendar year. Unless and until the Board adopts a Deferral Authorization as provided herein, no deferral of Fees shall be permitted.
(b) Deferral Election.
(i) Provided that a Deferral Authorization has been approved by the Board, any Eligible Director may, but is not required to, elect to defer receipt of all or any portion of any Fees to be earned by such Eligible Director by indicating such election to Golden Minerals on an Election Form supplied by Golden Minerals (each a " Deferral Election "). The Deferral Election must specify the Fees to be deferred and the period for which such Fees shall be deferred (each a " Deferral Period "). Each Deferral Election is irrevocable with respect to the Fees to which it applies and shall be valid only to the extent the Deferral Authorization covers the Fees and Deferral Period set forth in the Deferral Election.
(ii) Each Deferral Election must be made no later than the close of the calendar year prior to the first calendar year in which any services will be performed with respect to which Fees are deferred under such Deferral Election. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the first year in which an Eligible Director becomes eligible to participate in this Plan, the Eligible Director may make an initial Deferral Election within 30 days after the date the Eligible
3
Director becomes eligible to participate in this Plan, provided that, (i) such Deferral Election shall be valid only to the extent a Deferral Authorization covers the proposed Deferral Period, and (ii) such Deferral Election shall apply only to Fees payable with respect to services rendered after the date of such Deferral Election.
(iii) For so long as a Deferral Authorization is in effect with respect to any proposed deferral, a Deferral Election may be made annually at the Eligible Director's direction, and shall continue from calendar year to calendar year unless a written request to modify or terminate that election for subsequent calendar years is submitted to Golden Minerals on or before December 31 of such year.
(c) Credit for Amounts Deferred. The Fee Account will be credited with the number of Restricted Stock Units as are equal to the number of Shares, including fractions, that could have been purchased had the amount of the Fees accrued and deferred been used to purchase Shares on the date on which such Fees would have been earned had they not been deferred, at a price equal to Fair Market Value on such date. Restricted Stock Units awarded pursuant to this Section 6 shall vest immediately.
7. Dividends, Distributions and Adjustments.
(a) Whenever a cash dividend or any other distribution is paid with respect to Shares, the Award Account and Fee Account, as applicable, of each Eligible Director shall be credited with an additional number of Restricted Stock Units equal to the number of Shares that could have been purchased had such dividend or other distribution been paid on each Restricted Stock Unit in the Award Account and Fee Account, as applicable (on the record date for such dividend or distribution) and the amount of such dividend or value of such other distribution been used to acquire additional Shares at the Fair Market Value on the date such dividend or other distribution is paid. The value of any such other distribution on or related to Shares shall, at the option of the Board (or an authorized Committee of the Board), be either determined by the Board or independently established.
(b) The number of Restricted Stock Units shall be fully adjusted upon the occurrence of any stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification, recapitalization, merger or similar event, and shall be appropriately adjusted for the value (determined in the manner provided above with respect to distributions) of any right, privilege or opportunity provided or offered by Golden Minerals to holders of Shares.
8. Delivery of Shares.
(a) Within thirty (30) days following the date on which the Eligible Director ceases to be a member of the Board, a number of Shares equal to the number of vested Restricted Stock Units in such Eligible Director's Award Account and Fee Account shall be delivered to such Eligible Director, and all unvested Restricted Stock Units shall terminate.
(b) In the event of an Eligible Director's death, such Eligible Director's estate or beneficiary, as appropriate, shall be paid an amount equal to the Fair Market Value on the date of death of a number of Shares equal to the number of the vested and unvested Restricted Stock Units credited to his or her Award Account and Fee Account.
(c) In the event that an Eligible Director incurs an Unforeseeable Emergency, the Board may direct the immediate lump sum transfer to the Eligible Director of vested amounts (in Shares or in cash equal to the Fair Market Value of Shares) that the Board determines to be necessary to satisfy such Unforeseeable Emergency plus amounts necessary to pay taxes reasonably anticipated as a result of the distribution, after taking into account the extent to which such Unforeseeable Emergency is or may be relieved through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or
4
otherwise or by liquidation of the Eligible Director's assets (to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship). The preceding sentence shall be construed and administered in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Code. If a Eligible Director has suffered an Unforeseeable Emergency, the Board may, in its sole discretion, authorize the cessation of deferrals by such Eligible Director under the Plan. " Unforeseeable Emergency " shall mean a severe financial hardship to an Eligible Director resulting from an illness or accident of the Eligible Director, the Eligible Director's spouse, or a dependent (as defined in Section 152(a) of the Code) of the Eligible Director, loss of the Eligible Director's property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Eligible Director. This definition shall be construed and administered in accordance with the requirements of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii).
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, no benefits payable by reason of an Eligible Director ceasing to be a member of the Board will be payable unless, or until, such Eligible Director shall have experienced a separation from service within the meaning of Code Section 409A and Treasury Regulations thereunder.
(e) Distributions of fractional Restricted Stock Units shall be made in cash.
9. Alienability. No amount due or payable under the Plan or any interest in the Plan, shall be subject in any manner to alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, attachment, garnishment, lien, levy or like encumbrance. No such amount shall in any manner be liable for or subject to the debts or liability of any Eligible Director. Prior to delivery of Shares by Golden Minerals pursuant to Section 8, no Eligible Director shall have any right to transfer or assign any Share, or any right to receive any Share, credited to him or her under this Plan. Any purported assignment shall be null and void.
10. Eligible Director's Rights Unsecured. The right of an Eligible Director to receive any cash payment or Shares hereunder shall rank as an unsecured claim against Golden Minerals and shall be subject to the claims of general creditors in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of Golden Minerals. Assets that may be set aside for Golden Minerals' convenience with respect to the Plan, and bookkeeping accounts maintained pursuant to the Plan, shall not in any way be construed as assets held in trust for, or be subject to any prior claim by, an Eligible Director or beneficiary.
11. Effective Date. The Plan shall become effective on May 20, 2009.
12. Section 409A. Golden Minerals intends that payments and benefits payable under the Plan not be subject to the additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, and the Plan shall be construed in accordance with such intent. To the extent such payments or benefits could become subject to such Section, Golden Minerals shall cooperate with the Eligible Directors to amend the Plan with the goal of providing to the Eligible Directors the economic benefits described in the Plan in a manner that does not result in such tax being imposed. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, if (1) on the date of a Eligible Director's Separation from Service (as such term is used or defined in Code Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i), Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h), or any successor law or regulation), any of Golden Minerals' equity is publicly traded on an established securities market or otherwise (within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code) and (2) as a result of such Separation from Service, the Eligible Director would receive any payment that, absent the application of this sentence, would be subject to interest and additional tax imposed pursuant to Code Section 409A as a result of the application of Code Section 409A(2)(B)(i), then, to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of such interest and additional tax, such payment shall be deferred until the earlier of (i) 6 months after the Participant's Separation from Service or (ii) the Participant's death.
13. Amendment and Termination. The Board or any authorized Committee of the Board may at any time terminate, and may at any time and from time to time and in any respect amend, the Plan for any reason; provided that the Plan may not be amended more than once every six months, other than to comport with changes in the Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or the rules and regulations thereunder.
5
I, Jeffrey G. Clevenger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Minerals Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 7, 2009 | ||
|
|
/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER Jeffrey G. Clevenger President and Chief Executive Officer |
I, Robert P. Vogels, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Minerals Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 7, 2009 | ||
|
|
/s/ ROBERT P. VOGELS Robert P. Vogels Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Minerals Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER
Jeffrey G. Clevenger President and Chief Executive Officer August 7, 2009 |
||
/s/ ROBERT P. VOGELS Robert P. Vogels Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 7, 2009 |
|
|