Use these links to rapidly review the document
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION Form 10-K Annual Report—2011 Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

(Mark One)    

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From                                    to                                     

Commission File Number 1-15525



EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware   36-4316614
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

One Edwards Way, Irvine, California 92614
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

(949) 250-2500
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share   New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



          Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ý  No  o

          Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  o  No  ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý  No  o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý  No  o

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ý   Accelerated filer  o   Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
  Smaller Reporting Company  o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o  No  ý

          The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2011 (the last trading day of the registrant's most recently completed second quarter): $9,923,942,894 based on a closing price of $87.18 of the registrant's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange. This calculation does not reflect a determination that persons are affiliates for any other purpose.

          The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $1.00 par value, as of January 31, 2012, was 114,980,530.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

          Portions of the registrant's proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2011) are incorporated by reference into Part III, as indicated herein.


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
Form 10-K Annual Report—2011
Table of Contents

PART I

   

Item 1.

 

Business

  1

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  11

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  21

Item 2.

 

Properties

  21

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  21

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

  22

  

       

PART II

   

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  23

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  23

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  24

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  41

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  44

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  93

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  93

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

  94

  

       

PART III

   

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  95

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

  95

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  95

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  95

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  95

  

       

PART IV

   

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  96

 

Signatures

  98

Table of Contents


PART I

Item 1.    Business

         This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company (as defined below in "Corporate Background") intends the forward-looking statements contained in this report to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of such Acts. All statements other than statements of historical fact in this report or referred to or incorporated by reference into this report are "forward-looking statements" for purposes of these sections. These statements include, among other things, any predictions of earnings, revenues, expenses or other financial items, plans or expectations with respect to development activities, clinical trials or regulatory approvals, any statements of plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning the Company's future operations, financial conditions and prospects, and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. These statements can sometimes be identified by the use of the forward-looking words such as "may," "believe," "will," "expect," "project," "estimate," "should," "anticipate," "plan," "goal," "continue," "seek," "pro forma," "forecast," "intend," "guidance," "optimistic," "aspire," "confident," other forms of these words or similar words or expressions or the negative thereof. Investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's results or experiences or future business, financial condition, results of operations or performance to differ materially from the Company's historical results or those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements contained in this report. See "Risk Factors" below for a further discussion of these risks, as well as the Company's subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statement. If the Company does update or correct one or more of these statements, investors and others should not conclude that the Company will make additional updates or corrections.

Overview

        Edwards Lifesciences Corporation is a global leader in the science of heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring. Driven by a passion to help patients, the Company partners with clinicians to develop innovative technologies in the areas of structural heart disease and critical care monitoring that enable them to save and enhance lives.

        Cardiovascular disease is the number-one cause of death in the world, and is the top disease in terms of health care spending in nearly every country. Cardiovascular disease is progressive in that it tends to worsen over time and often affects an individual's entire circulatory system. In its later stages, cardiovascular disease is frequently treated by surgical interventions or less invasive therapies.

        The products and technologies provided by Edwards Lifesciences to treat advanced cardiovascular disease or critically ill patients are categorized into four main areas: Heart Valve Therapy; Critical Care; Cardiac Surgery Systems; and Vascular.

        Patients undergoing surgical treatment for cardiovascular disease may be treated using a variety of Edwards Lifesciences' products and technologies. For example, an individual with a heart valve disorder may have a faulty valve. A clinician may elect to remove the valve and replace it with one of Edwards Lifesciences' bioprosthetic surgical tissue heart valves, surgically re-shape and repair the faulty valve with an Edwards Lifesciences annuloplasty ring, or deploy an Edwards Lifesciences transcatheter valve via a minimally invasive catheter-based system. Virtually all high-risk patients in the operating room or intensive care unit are candidates for having their cardiac function monitored by Edwards Lifesciences' Critical Care products. If a patient undergoes open-heart surgery, Edwards Lifesciences' Cardiac Surgery Systems products may be used while the patient's heart and lung functions are being bypassed, or used during minimally invasive valve surgery. If the circulatory problems are in the limbs rather than in the heart, the patient's procedure may involve some of Edwards Lifesciences' Vascular products, which include various types of balloon-tipped catheters that are used to remove blood clots from diseased blood vessels.

1


Table of Contents

Corporate Background

        Edwards Lifesciences Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on September 10, 1999. Unless otherwise indicated or otherwise required by the context, the terms "we," "our," "it," "its," "Company," "Edwards" and "Edwards Lifesciences" refer to Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and its subsidiaries.

        Edwards Lifesciences' principal executive offices are located at One Edwards Way, Irvine, California 92614. The telephone number at that address is (949) 250-2500. The Company makes available, free of charge on its website located at www.edwards.com, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The Company's corporate governance guidelines, audit and public policy committee charter, compensation and governance committee charter, and code of business conduct (business practice standards) are also posted on the Company's website at www.edwards.com under "Investor Relations." The contents of the Company's website are not incorporated by reference into this report.

Edwards Lifesciences' Product and Technology Offerings

        The following discussion summarizes the main categories of products and technologies offered by Edwards Lifesciences to treat advanced cardiovascular disease. For more information on net sales from these four main categories, see "Net Sales by Product Line " under " Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ."

Heart Valve Therapy

        Edwards Lifesciences is the global leader in heart valve therapy and the world's leading manufacturer of tissue heart valves and repair products, which are used to replace or repair a patient's diseased or defective heart valve. The Company produces pericardial and porcine valves from biologically inert animal tissue sewn onto proprietary wireform stents.

        The core of Edwards Lifesciences' surgical tissue heart valve product line is the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve, including the line of PERIMOUNT Magna valves, the newest generation pericardial valves for aortic and mitral replacement. With their proven durability and performance, PERIMOUNT valves are the most widely prescribed tissue heart valves in the world. The durability of Edwards Lifesciences' tissue valves is extended through the use of its proprietary ThermaFix and XenoLogiX tissue treatment processes. Edwards Lifesciences also sells porcine valves and stentless tissue valves. In addition to its replacement valves, Edwards Lifesciences pioneered and is the worldwide leader in heart valve repair therapies, including annuloplasty rings and systems. The Company has continued to extend its leadership in its surgical tissue heart valve product line with the recent introduction of the PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valve and the next generation Carpentier-Edwards Physio II mitral valve repair ring. Sales of the Company's surgical heart valve products represented approximately 40%, 44% and 46% of the Company's net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Edwards Lifesciences has leveraged the knowledge and experience from its surgical tissue heart valve portfolio to develop transcatheter heart valve replacement technologies, designed to treat heart valve disease using catheter-based approaches as opposed to open surgical techniques. For aortic valve replacement, the Company has developed the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve, which is delivered using the RetroFlex 3 delivery system for transfemoral approaches, and the Ascendra delivery system for transapical approaches. Both are minimal access, beating heart procedures. In late 2011, the Edwards SAPIEN valve with the RetroFlex 3 delivery system was approved for use in certain inoperable patients in the United States. The Company has also developed the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve, which is delivered using the lower profile NovaFlex delivery system for transfemoral approaches, and the Ascendra2 delivery system for transapical approaches. The Edwards SAPIEN XT valve is available for sale in Europe and other international markets, and is currently in clinical study in the United States and Japan. Sales of the Company's

2


Table of Contents

transcatheter heart valves represented approximately 20%, 14% and 9% of the Company's net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Critical Care

        Edwards Lifesciences is a world leader in hemodynamic monitoring systems used to measure a patient's heart function in surgical and intensive care settings. Hemodynamic monitoring enables a clinician to balance the oxygen supply and demand of a critically ill patient and plays an important role in assuring tissue and organ perfusion, and ultimately patient survival.

        Edwards Lifesciences' hemodynamic monitoring technologies are utilized before, during and after open-heart, major vascular, major abdominal, neurological and orthopedic surgical procedures. Edwards Lifesciences manufactures and markets the Swan-Ganz line of pulmonary artery catheters, and the PreSep continuous venous oximetry catheter for measuring central venous oxygen saturation. Edwards' hemodynamic monitoring product line also includes the PediaSat oximetry catheter, the first real-time, continuous venous oxygen saturation monitoring device designed specifically for children. The Company also offers the FloTrac continuous cardiac output monitoring system, a minimally invasive cardiac monitoring technology for goal-directed fluid optimization. The Company's VolumeView sensor-catheter set measures a critically ill patient's volumetric hemodynamic parameters, while the EV1000 touch-screen clinical monitoring platform displays a patient's physiologic status and integrates many of the Company's sensors and catheters into one intuitive system. During 2011, the availability of the EV1000 platform was expanded to include the United States. Edwards Lifesciences is also the global leader in disposable pressure monitoring devices and innovative closed-loop blood sampling systems to protect both patients and clinicians from the risk of infection. Sales of the Company's hemodynamic monitoring devices represented approximately 29% of the Company's net sales in 2011 and 2010, and 30% of the Company's net sales in 2009.

        Together with a third party, the Company is developing automated glucose monitoring technologies for intensive care hospital settings. Glycemic control has been advocated in many medical society guidelines as an important therapy for improving clinical outcomes.

Cardiac Surgery Systems

        Cardiac surgeons and their patients increasingly are seeking less invasive approaches to aortic or mitral valve surgery, which offer a number of benefits, including smaller incisions, less blood loss, quick recoveries and less scarring. Edwards Lifesciences' Cardiac Surgery Systems product line includes the ThruPort minimal incision valve surgery ("MIVS") platform that enables surgeons to perform intricate procedures through small incisions and tailor procedures based on their preferred surgical approach. The ThruPort systems portfolio includes soft tissue retractors, aortic occlusion devices, venting, coronary sinus catheters and reusable instrumentation. To support the adoption of MIVS techniques, the Company offers comprehensive team training, onsite clinical operating room support and extensive educational platforms. Edwards Lifesciences is also a global leader in protection cannulae, which are used during cardiac surgery in venous drainage, aortic perfusion, venting and cardioplegia delivery.

Vascular

        The pervasive nature of cardiovascular disease means that the circulatory conditions that occur inside the heart are often mirrored in peripheral blood vessels elsewhere in a patient's body. Atherosclerotic disease is one common condition that involves the thickening of blood vessels and the formation of circulation restricting plaque, clots and other substances.

        Edwards Lifesciences manufactures and sells a variety of products used to treat endolumenal occlusive disease, including balloon-tipped, catheter-based embolectomy products, surgical clips and clamps. Edwards Lifesciences' Fogarty line of embolectomy catheters has been an industry standard for removing blood clots from peripheral blood vessels for more than 40 years.

3


Table of Contents

Competition

        The medical device industry is highly competitive. Edwards Lifesciences competes with many companies, ranging from small start-up enterprises to companies that are larger and more established than Edwards Lifesciences with access to significant financial resources. Furthermore, new product development and technological change characterize the markets in which Edwards Lifesciences competes. The present or future products of Edwards Lifesciences could be rendered obsolete or uneconomical as a result of technological advances by one or more of Edwards Lifesciences' present or future competitors or by other therapies, including drug therapies. Edwards Lifesciences must continue to develop and acquire new products and technologies to remain competitive in the cardiovascular medical device industry. Edwards Lifesciences believes that it competes primarily on the basis of clinical superiority and innovative features that enhance patient benefit, product reliability, performance, customer and sales support, and cost-effectiveness.

        The cardiovascular segment of the medical device industry is dynamic and subject to significant change due to cost-of-care considerations, regulatory reform, industry and customer consolidation, and evolving patient needs. The ability to provide products and technologies that demonstrate value and improve clinical outcomes is becoming increasingly important for medical device manufacturers.

        Edwards Lifesciences believes that it is one of the leading competitors, in terms of global market share, in each of its major product lines. The Company's products and technologies face substantial competition from a number of companies including divisions of companies much larger than Edwards Lifesciences and smaller companies that compete in specific product categories or certain geographies. In Heart Valve Therapy, the Company's primary competitors include St. Jude Medical, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Sorin Group. In Critical Care, Edwards Lifesciences competes primarily with a variety of companies in specific product categories including ICU Medical, Inc., PULSION Medical Systems AG and LiDCO Group PLC. In Cardiac Surgery Systems, Edwards Lifesciences competes primarily with Medtronic, Inc. In Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences competes with a wide variety of mostly smaller companies.

Sales and Marketing

        Edwards Lifesciences has a number of broad product lines that require a sales and marketing strategy tailored to its customers in order to deliver high-quality, cost-effective products and technologies to all of its customers worldwide. Edwards Lifesciences' portfolio includes some of the most recognizable product brands in cardiovascular devices today. To help broaden awareness of the Company's products and technologies, Edwards Lifesciences conducts educational symposia and provides training to its customers.

        Because of the diverse global needs of the population that Edwards Lifesciences serves, the Company's distribution system consists of a direct sales force as well as independent distributors. Edwards Lifesciences is not dependent on any single customer and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's net sales in 2011.

        Sales personnel work closely with the primary decision makers who purchase Edwards Lifesciences' products, which primarily include physicians, but can also include material managers, nurses, biomedical staff, hospital administrators, purchasing managers and ministries of health. Also, for certain of its products and where appropriate, the Company's sales force actively pursues approval of Edwards Lifesciences as a qualified supplier for hospital group purchasing organizations ("GPOs") that negotiate contracts with suppliers of medical products. Additionally, Edwards Lifesciences has contracts with a number of United States national and regional buying groups.

        United States.     In the United States, Edwards Lifesciences sells substantially all of its products through its direct sales force. In 2011, 36% of Edwards Lifesciences' reported sales were derived from sales to customers in the United States.

        International.     In 2011, 64% of Edwards Lifesciences' reported sales were derived internationally through its direct sales force and independent distributors. Of the total international sales, 54% were in

4


Table of Contents

Europe, 26% were in Japan, and 20% were in Rest of World. Edwards Lifesciences sells its products in approximately 100 countries, and its major international markets include Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain and United Kingdom. A majority of the sales and marketing approach outside the United States is direct sales, although it varies depending on each country's size and state of development. The international markets in which the Company chooses to market its products are also influenced by the existence of, or potential for, adequate product reimbursement at the country level.

Raw Materials and Manufacturing

        Edwards Lifesciences operates manufacturing facilities in various geographies around the world. The Company maintains heart valve manufacturing facilities in California, Switzerland and Singapore. Critical Care products are manufactured primarily in the Company's facilities located in Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic. Edwards' Cardiac Surgery Systems and Vascular products are manufactured primarily in Utah and Puerto Rico, respectively.

        Edwards Lifesciences uses a diverse and broad range of raw and organic materials in the design, development and manufacture of its products. Edwards Lifesciences' non-implantable products are manufactured from man-made raw materials including resins, chemicals, electronics and metal. Most of Edwards Lifesciences' Heart Valve Therapy products are manufactured from natural tissues harvested from animal tissue, as well as man-made materials. The Company purchases certain materials and components used in manufacturing its products from external suppliers. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences purchases certain supplies from single sources for reasons of quality assurance, sole source availability, cost effectiveness or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements.

        Edwards Lifesciences works closely with its suppliers to mitigate risk and assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability. Alternative supplier options are generally considered and identified, although the Company does not typically pursue regulatory qualification of alternative sources due to the strength of its existing supplier relationships and the time and expense associated with the regulatory validation process.

        Edwards Lifesciences follows rigorous sourcing and manufacturing procedures intended to safeguard humans from potential risks associated with diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy ("BSE"). International health and regulatory authorities have given guidance identifying three factors contributing to the control of BSE: source of animals, nature of tissue used and manufacturing process controls. In the countries in which the Company sells its products, it complies with all current global guidelines regarding risks for products intended to be implanted in humans. The Company obtains bovine tissue used in its pericardial tissue valve products only from sources within the United States and Australia, where strong control measures and surveillance programs exist. In addition, bovine tissue used in the Company's pericardial tissue valve products is from tissue types considered by global health and regulatory organizations to have shown no risk of infectibility. The Company's manufacturing and sterilization processes are designed to render tissue biologically safe from all known infectious agents and viruses, and exceed the worldwide standard for sterile medical products. See "Risk Factors" contained herein.

Quality Assurance

        Edwards Lifesciences is committed to providing quality products to its customers. To meet this commitment, the Company has implemented modern quality systems and concepts throughout the organization. The quality system starts with the initial product specification and continues through the design of the product, component specification processes, and the manufacturing, sales and servicing of the product. The quality system is intended to incorporate quality into products and utilizes continuous improvement concepts throughout the product lifecycle.

5


Table of Contents

        Edwards Lifesciences' operations are certified under applicable international quality systems standards, such as International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") 9000 and ISO 13485. These standards require, among other items, quality system controls that are applied to product design, component material, suppliers and manufacturing operations. These ISO certifications can be obtained only after a complete audit of a company's quality system has been conducted by an independent outside auditor. Periodic reexamination by an independent outside auditor is required to maintain these certifications.

Environmental Health and Safety

        Edwards Lifesciences is committed to a safe and healthy workplace and the promotion of environmental excellence in its own communities and worldwide. Through its Environmental Health and Safety function, the Company facilitates compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and monitors performance against these requirements at all levels of its organization. In order to measure performance, the Company monitors a number of metrics, which include the generation of both regulated and non-regulated waste, emissions of air toxics, energy usage and lost time incidents in the Company's production activities. Each of the Company's manufacturing sites is evaluated regularly with respect to a broad range of Environmental Health and Safety criteria.

Research and Development

        Edwards Lifesciences is engaged in ongoing research and development to deliver clinically advanced new products, to enhance the effectiveness, ease of use, safety and reliability of its current leading products, and to expand the applications of its products as appropriate. Edwards Lifesciences focuses on opportunities within specific areas of cardiovascular disease and critical care monitoring, and is dedicated to developing novel technologies to better enable clinicians to treat patients who suffer from the disease.

        The Company invested $246.3 million in research and development in 2011, $204.4 million in 2010, and $175.5 million in 2009 (14.7%, 14.1% and 13.3% of net sales, respectively). A significant portion of the Company's research and development investment has been applied to extend and defend its leadership position in transcatheter heart valve replacement technologies, surgical tissue heart valves, heart valve repair therapies, and hemodynamic monitoring products. Additionally, the Company dedicates a sizable portion of its research and development investment to developing advanced technologies designed to address unmet clinical needs within the area of structural heart disease.

        Edwards Lifesciences is investing substantially in the development of transcatheter heart valve technologies designed to treat heart valve disease using a catheter-based approach as opposed to open surgical techniques. In the area of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the Company is developing a repositionable, self-expanding transcatheter heart valve system, the Edwards CENTERA valve, in addition to its next generation balloon-expandable valve, the Edwards SAPIEN 3. Surgical heart valve therapy development programs include the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System , a minimally invasive aortic heart valve system designed to enable a faster procedure, shorter patient time on cardiopulmonary bypass and a smaller incision.

        In its Critical Care product line, the Company is pursuing the development of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring systems, automated glucose monitoring and other technologies that collect critical patient information less invasively than current technologies. In its Cardiac Surgery Systems product line, the Company plans to broaden its offering of minimally invasive surgical technologies and other products to complement its surgical heart valve therapy products.

        Edwards Lifesciences' research and development activities are conducted primarily in facilities located in the United States and Israel. The Company's experienced research and development staff is focused on product design and development, quality, clinical research and regulatory compliance. To pursue primary research efforts, Edwards Lifesciences has developed alliances with several leading research institutions and universities, and also works with leading clinicians around the world in conducting scientific studies on the Company's existing and developing products. These studies include clinical trials, which provide data for use in regulatory submissions, and post-market approval studies involving applications of Edwards Lifesciences' products.

6


Table of Contents

Proprietary Technology

        Patents and other proprietary rights are important to the success of Edwards Lifesciences' business. Edwards Lifesciences also relies upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain its competitive position.

        Edwards Lifesciences owns more than 1,000 issued United States patents, pending United States patent applications, issued foreign patents and pending foreign patent applications. The Company also has licensed various United States and foreign patents and patent applications that relate to aspects of the technology incorporated in certain of Edwards Lifesciences' products, including its heart valves, and annuloplasty rings and systems. Edwards Lifesciences also owns or has rights in United States and foreign patents and patent applications in the field of transcatheter heart valve repair and replacement. In addition, Edwards Lifesciences owns or has rights in United States and foreign patents and patent applications that cover catheters, systems and methods for hemodynamic monitoring, and vascular access products.

        Edwards Lifesciences is a party to several license agreements with unrelated third parties pursuant to which it has obtained, for varying terms, the exclusive or non-exclusive rights to certain patents held by such third parties in consideration for cross licensing rights or royalty payments. Edwards Lifesciences has also licensed certain patent rights to others.

        Edwards Lifesciences monitors the products of its competitors for possible infringement of Edwards Lifesciences' owned and/or licensed patents. Litigation has been necessary to enforce certain patent rights held by Edwards Lifesciences, and the Company plans to continue to defend and prosecute its rights with respect to such patents.

        Edwards Lifesciences owns certain United States registered trademarks used in its business. Many Company trademarks have also been registered for use in certain foreign countries where registration is available and Edwards Lifesciences has determined it is commercially advantageous to do so.

Government Regulation and Other Matters

        The Company's products and technologies are subject to regulation by numerous domestic and foreign government agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), and various laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of the Company's products and technologies. The Company is also governed by federal, state, local and international laws of general applicability, such as those regulating employee health and safety and the protection of the environment. Overall, the amount and scope of domestic and foreign laws and regulations applicable to the Company's business is increasing.

        United States Regulation.     In the United States, the FDA has responsibility for regulating medical devices. The FDA regulates design, development, testing, clinical studies, manufacturing, labeling, promotion and record-keeping for medical devices, and reporting of adverse events, recalls, or other field actions by manufacturers and users to identify potential problems with marketed medical devices. Many of the devices that Edwards Lifesciences develops and markets are in a category for which the FDA has implemented stringent clinical investigation and pre-market clearance or approval requirements. The process of obtaining FDA clearance or approval to market a product is resource intensive, lengthy and costly. FDA review may involve substantial delays that adversely affect the marketing and sale of Edwards Lifesciences' products. A number of the Company's products are pending regulatory clearance or approval to begin commercial sales in various markets. Ultimately, the FDA may not authorize the commercial release of a medical device if it determines the device is not safe and effective or does not meet other standards for clearance. Additionally, even if a product is cleared or approved, the FDA may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the effects of these products once commercialized.

        The FDA has the authority to halt the distribution of certain medical devices, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded medical devices, order the repair, replacement or refund of the costs of such devices, or

7


Table of Contents

preclude the importation of devices that are or appear violative. The FDA also conducts inspections to determine compliance with the quality system regulations concerning the manufacturing and design of devices and current medical device reporting regulations, recall regulations, clinical testing regulations, and other requirements. The FDA may withdraw product clearances or approvals due to failure to comply with regulatory standards or the occurrence of unforeseen problems following initial approval and require notification of health professionals and others with regard to medical devices that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. Additionally, the failure to comply with FDA or comparable regulatory standards or the discovery of previously unknown product problems could result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances or approvals, seizures, injunctions, recalls, refunds, civil money penalties, or criminal prosecution. The Company's compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review. Moreover, the FDA and several other United States agencies administer controls over the export of medical devices from the United States and the importation of devices into the United States, which could also subject the Company to sanctions for noncompliance.

        The Company is also subject to additional laws and regulations that govern its business operations, products and technologies, including:

    federal, state and foreign anti-kickback laws and regulations, which generally prohibit payments to physicians or other purchasers of medical products as an inducement to purchase a product;

    the Stark law, which prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to a provider that bills these programs for the provision of certain designated health services if the physician (or a member of the physician's immediate family) has a financial relationship with that provider;

    federal and state laws and regulations that protect the confidentiality of certain patient health information, including patient records, and restrict the use and disclosure of such information, in particular, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996;

    the False Claims Act, which prohibits the submission of false or otherwise improper claims for payment to a federally funded health care program, and health care fraud statutes that prohibit false statements and improper claims to any third-party payor; and

    the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which can be used to prosecute companies in the United States for arrangements with foreign government officials or other parties outside the United States.

        Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in criminal liability, significant fines or penalties, negative publicity and substantial costs and expenses associated with investigation and enforcement activities. To assist in the Company's compliance efforts, the Company adheres to many codes of ethics and conduct regarding its sales and marketing activities in the United States and other countries in which it operates. In addition, the Company has in place and works to improve its internal business compliance programs and policies.

        International Regulation.     Internationally, the regulation of medical devices is complex. In Europe, the Company's products are subject to extensive regulatory requirements. The regulatory regime in the European Union for medical devices became mandatory in June 1998. It requires that medical devices may only be placed on the market if they do not compromise safety and health when properly installed, maintained and used in accordance with their intended purpose. National laws conforming to the European Union's legislation regulate the Company's products under the medical devices regulatory system. Although the more variable national requirements under which medical devices were formerly regulated have been substantially replaced by the European Union Medical Devices Directive, individual nations can still impose unique requirements that may require supplemental submissions. The European Union medical device laws require manufacturers to declare that their products conform to the essential regulatory requirements after which the products may be placed on the market bearing the CE Mark. Manufacturers' quality systems for products in all but the lowest risk classification are also subject to certification and audit by an independent notified body. In

8


Table of Contents

Europe, particular emphasis is being placed on more sophisticated and faster procedures for the reporting of adverse events to the competent authorities.

        In Japan, pre-market approval and clinical studies are required as is governmental pricing approval for medical devices. Clinical studies are subject to a stringent "Good Clinical Practices" standard. Approval time frames from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare vary from simple notifications to review periods of one or more years, depending on the complexity and risk level of the device. In addition, importation into Japan of medical devices is subject to the "Good Import Practices" regulations. As with any highly regulated market, significant changes in the regulatory environment could adversely affect future sales.

        In many of the other foreign countries in which the Company markets its products, the Company may be subject to regulations affecting, among other things:

    product standards and specifications;

    packaging requirements;

    labeling requirements;

    quality system requirements;

    import restrictions;

    tariffs;

    duties; and

    tax requirements.

        Many of the regulations applicable to our devices and products in these countries are similar to those of the FDA. In some regions, the level of government regulation of medical devices is increasing, which can lengthen time to market and increase registration and approval costs. In many countries, the national health or social security organizations require the Company's products to be qualified before they can be marketed and considered eligible for reimbursement.

        Health Care Initiatives.     Government and private sector initiatives to limit the growth of health care costs, including price regulation and competitive pricing, coverage and payment policies, comparative effectiveness therapies, technology assessments and managed-care arrangements, are continuing in many countries where Edwards Lifesciences does business, including the United States, Europe and Japan. As a result of these changes, the marketplace has placed increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies. For example, government programs, private health care insurance and managed-care plans have attempted to control costs by limiting the amount of reimbursement they will pay for procedures or treatments, and some third-party payors require their pre-approval before new or innovative devices or therapies are utilized by patients. These various initiatives have created increased price sensitivity over medical products generally and may impact demand for the Company's products and technologies.

        The delivery of the Company's products is subject to regulation by the Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") and comparable state and foreign agencies responsible for reimbursement and regulation of health care items and services. Foreign governments also impose regulations in connection with their health care reimbursement programs and the delivery of health care items and services. Reimbursement schedules regulate the amount the United States government will reimburse hospitals and doctors for the inpatient care of persons covered by Medicare. CMS may also review whether and/or under what circumstances a procedure or technology is reimbursable. Several legislative proposals in the United States have been advanced that would restrict future funding increases for government-funded programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. Changes in current reimbursement levels could have an adverse effect on market demand and the Company's pricing flexibility.

9


Table of Contents

        Hospital reimbursement in the United States for transcatheter aortic valve replacement ("TAVR") procedures is currently aligned with surgical aortic valve replacement codes. In September 2011, CMS initiated a national coverage analysis for TAVR, which was expected to lead to a national coverage determination ("NCD"). In February 2012, CMS issued a draft NCD, and a final NCD is expected by mid-year 2012. The Company believes a well-written NCD that ensures adequate patient access would be positive for patients and physicians. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this process, and a negative determination, such as one that restricts the use of its products, could have an adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

        Health care cost containment efforts have also prompted domestic hospitals and other customers of medical device manufacturers to consolidate into larger purchasing groups to enhance purchasing power, and this trend is expected to continue. The medical device industry has also experienced some consolidation, partly in order to offer a broader range of products to large purchasers. As a result, transactions with customers are larger, more complex and tend to involve more long-term contracts than in the past. These larger customers, due to their enhanced purchasing power, may attempt to increase the pressure on product pricing.

        Health Care Reform.     In 2010, significant reforms to the healthcare system were adopted as law in the United States. The law includes provisions that, among other things, reduce or limit Medicare reimbursement, require all individuals to have health insurance (with limited exceptions) and impose increased taxes. Specifically, the law requires the medical device industry to subsidize healthcare reform in the form of a 2.3% excise tax on United States sales of most medical devices beginning in 2013. The excise tax will increase the Company's operating expenses. Because many parts of the 2010 healthcare law remain subject to implementation, the long-term impact on the Company is uncertain. The new law or any future legislation could reduce medical procedure volumes, lower reimbursement for the Company's products, and impact the demand for the Company's products or the prices at which the Company sells its products.

        Puerto Rico Excise Tax.     On October 25, 2010, the Puerto Rican government enacted a new tax law effective for transactions occurring after December 31, 2010. The law, Act 154, modifies Puerto Rican tax law by imposing a temporary excise tax on intercompany purchases made through 2016 and by adopting a new sourcing rule. The Company projects that the excise tax impact for 2011 of $6.1 million will be offset by credits available under the implementing excise tax regulations. The financial impact of the new sourcing rule is not expected to be material.

Seasonality

        Edwards Lifesciences' quarterly net sales are influenced by many factors, including new product introductions, acquisitions, regulatory approvals, patient and physician holiday schedules, and other factors. Net sales in the third quarter are typically lower than other quarters of the year due to the seasonality of the United States and European markets, where summer vacation schedules normally result in fewer procedures.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2011, Edwards Lifesciences had approximately 7,800 employees worldwide, the majority of whom were located at the Company's headquarters in Irvine, California, and at its manufacturing facilities in Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic. Other major concentrations of employees are located in Europe, Japan and Singapore. Edwards Lifesciences emphasizes competitive compensation, benefits, equity participation and work environment practices in its efforts to attract and retain qualified personnel, and employs a rigorous talent management system. None of Edwards Lifesciences' North American employees are represented by a labor union. In various countries outside of North America, the Company interacts with trade unions and work councils that represent a limited number of employees.

10


Table of Contents


Item 1A.    Risk Factors

         Our business and assets are subject to varying degrees of risk and uncertainty. An investor should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business. If any of these events or circumstances occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially harmed. In that case, the value of our securities could decline and an investor could lose part or all of his or her investment. In addition, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in our other filings or statements may be subject to the risks described below as well as other risks and uncertainties. Please read the cautionary notice regarding forward-looking statements in Item 7 below.

If we do not introduce new products in a timely manner, our products may become obsolete and our operating results may suffer.

        The cardiovascular products industry is characterized by technological changes, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new and improved products, our products could become technologically obsolete or more susceptible to competition and our revenue and operating results would suffer. Even if we are able to develop new or improved products, our ability to market them could be limited by the need for regulatory clearance, restrictions imposed on approved indications, entrenched patterns of clinical practice, uncertainty over third-party reimbursement or other factors. We devote significant financial and other resources to our research and development activities; however, the research and development process is prolonged and entails considerable uncertainty. Accordingly, products we are currently developing may not complete the development process or obtain the regulatory or other approvals required to market such products in a timely manner or at all.

        Technical innovations often require substantial time and investment before we can determine their commercial viability. We may not have the financial resources necessary to fund these projects. In addition, even if we are able to successfully develop new or improved products, they may not produce revenue in excess of the costs of development, and they may be rendered obsolete or less competitive by changing customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products with newer technologies or features or other factors.

We may incur product liability losses that could adversely affect our operating results.

        Our business exposes us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices. Our products are often used in surgical and intensive care settings with seriously ill patients. In addition, many of the medical devices we manufacture and sell are designed to be implanted in the human body for long periods of time. Component failures, manufacturing flaws, design defects or inadequate disclosure of product related risks or product related information could result in an unsafe condition or injury to, or death of, patients. Such a problem could result in product liability lawsuits and claims, safety alerts or product recalls in the future, which, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation and on our ability to attract and retain customers. Product liability claims may be brought from time to time either by individuals or by groups seeking to represent a class. We may incur charges related to such matters in excess of any established reserves and such charges, including the establishment of any such reserves, could have a material adverse impact on our net income and net cash flows.

We may experience supply interruptions that could harm our ability to manufacture products.

        We use a broad range of raw and organic materials and other items in the design and manufacture of our products. Our Heart Valve Therapy products are manufactured from treated natural animal tissue and

11


Table of Contents

man-made materials. Our non-implantable products are manufactured from man-made raw materials including resins, chemicals, electronics and metals. We purchase certain of the materials and components used in the manufacture of our products from external suppliers, and we purchase certain supplies from single sources for reasons of quality assurance, cost-effectiveness, availability or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. General economic conditions could adversely affect the financial viability of our suppliers, resulting in their inability to provide materials and components used in the manufacture of our products. While we work closely with suppliers to monitor their financial viability and to assure continuity of supply and maintain high quality and reliability, these efforts may not be successful. In addition, due to the rigorous regulations and requirements of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities regarding the manufacture of our products (including the need for approval of any change in supply arrangements), we may have difficulty establishing additional or replacement sources on a timely basis or at all if the need arises. Although alternative supplier options are considered and identified, we typically do not pursue regulatory qualification of alternative sources due to the strength of our existing supplier relationships and the time and expense associated with the regulatory validation process. A change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to product performance or incorporate unique technology, and the loss of any existing supply contract could have a material adverse effect on us.

        Regulatory agencies in the United States or other international geographies from time to time have limited or banned the use of certain materials used in the manufacture of our products. In these circumstances, transition periods typically provide time to arrange for alternative materials. If we are unable to identify alternative materials and secure approval for their use in a timely manner, our business could be harmed.

        Some of our suppliers are located outside the United States. As a result, trade or regulatory embargoes imposed by foreign countries or the United States could result in delays or shortages that could harm our business.

The manufacture of many of our products is highly complex and subject to strict quality controls. If we or one of our suppliers encounters manufacturing or quality problems, our business could suffer.

        The manufacture of many of our products is highly complex and subject to strict quality controls, due in part to rigorous regulatory requirements. In addition, quality is extremely important due to the serious and costly consequences of a product failure. Problems can arise during the manufacturing process for a number of reasons, including equipment malfunction, failure to follow protocols and procedures, raw material problems or human error. If these problems arise or if we otherwise fail to meet our internal quality standards or those of the FDA or other applicable regulatory body, which include detailed record-keeping requirements, our reputation could be damaged, we could become subject to a safety alert or a recall, we could incur product liability and other costs, product approvals could be delayed and our business could otherwise be adversely affected.

We may be required, from time to time, to recognize charges in connection with the write-down of our investments, asset or business dispositions, the termination of interest rate swap agreements, or for other reasons.

        We have equity investments in other companies, and we may make similar investments in the future. To the extent that the value of any of these investments declines, we may be required to recognize charges to write down the value of that investment.

        At December 31, 2011, we had $21.8 million of investments in equity instruments of other companies and had recorded unrealized gains of $1.1 million on these investments on our consolidated balance sheet in " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss ," net of tax.

        In addition, from time to time we identify businesses and products that are not performing at a level commensurate with the rest of our business. We may seek to dispose of these underperforming businesses or products. We may also seek to dispose of other businesses or products for strategic or other business reasons.

12


Table of Contents

If we cannot dispose of a business or product on acceptable terms, we may voluntarily cease operations related to that business or product. Any of these events could result in charges, which could be substantial and which could adversely affect our results of operations.

        Historically, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements and may do so from time to time in the future. In the event that we elect to terminate a swap agreement prior to its maturity, we could be required to make cash payments to the counterparty and to recognize a charge in connection with that termination, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

We may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or strategic alliances on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or alliances, and such acquisitions could result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, require significant management resources and require significant charges or write-downs.

        We regularly explore potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies, services or products, as well as potential strategic alliances. We may be unable to find suitable acquisition candidates or appropriate partners with which to form alliances. Even if we identify appropriate acquisition or alliance candidates, we may be unable to complete the acquisitions or alliances on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business, technology, service or product into our existing operations could result in unforeseen difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company often requires significant expenditures as well as significant management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our other businesses. Moreover, we may not realize the anticipated financial or other benefits of an acquisition or alliance.

        We may be required to take charges or write-downs in connection with acquisitions. In particular, acquisitions of businesses engaged in the development of new products may give rise to in-process research and development assets. To the extent that the value of these assets declines, we may be required to write down the value of the assets. Also, in connection with certain asset acquisitions, we may be required to take an immediate charge related to acquired in-process research and development. Either of these situations could result in substantial charges, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

        Future acquisitions could also involve the issuance of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization of expenses related to other intangible assets, any of which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, equity or debt financing required for such acquisitions may not be available.

General economic and political conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        External factors can affect our profitability and financial condition. Such external factors include general domestic and global economic conditions, such as interest rates, tax rates and factors affecting global economic stability, and the political environment regarding healthcare in general. While the economic environment has shown some signs of improvement, the strength and timing of any economic recovery remains uncertain, and we cannot predict to what extent the global economic slowdown may negatively impact our business. For example, an increase in interest rates could result in an increase in our borrowing costs and could otherwise restrict our ability to access the capital markets. Negative conditions in the credit and capital markets could impair our ability to access the financial markets for working capital or other funds, and could negatively impact our ability to borrow. Such conditions could result in decreased liquidity and impairments in the carrying value of our investments, and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. These and other conditions could also adversely affect our customers, and may impact their ability or decision to purchase our products or make payments on a timely basis.

        In 2010, significant reforms to the healthcare system were adopted as law in the United States. The law includes provisions that, among other things, reduce or limit Medicare reimbursement, require all individuals to have health insurance (with limited exceptions) and impose increased taxes. Specifically, the law requires

13


Table of Contents

the medical device industry to subsidize healthcare reform in the form of a 2.3% excise tax on United States sales of most medical devices beginning in 2013. The excise tax will increase our operating expenses. Because many parts of the 2010 healthcare law remain subject to implementation, the long-term impact on us is uncertain. The new law or any future legislation could reduce medical procedure volumes, lower reimbursement for the Company's products, and impact the demand for the Company's products or the prices at which the Company sells its products. The Budget Control Act of 2011, which provided an increase to the United States debt limit, imposed significant cuts in federal spending over the next decade. Subsequently, as a result of the inability of a bipartisan Congressional committee to agree on further deficit reduction, certain additional mandatory spending cuts will take effect in the future unless Congress and the President agree otherwise. In addition, alternative deficit reduction proposals could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and prospects if they were to include cuts to, or a restructuring of, entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid programs.

        We do business with foreign governments outside the United States. A number of these countries, including certain European countries, have experienced a deterioration in credit and economic conditions. These conditions have resulted in, and may continue to result in, a reduction in the number of procedures that use our products and an increase in the average length of time that it takes to collect accounts receivable outstanding in these countries. In addition, we have been and may continue to be impacted by declines in sovereign credit ratings or sovereign defaults in these countries.

Our business is subject to economic, political and other risks associated with international sales and operations, including risks arising from currency exchange rate fluctuations.

        Because we sell our products in a number of countries, our business is subject to the risks of doing business internationally, including risks associated with United States government oversight and enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as with the United Kingdom's Bribery Act and anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions. Our net sales originating outside of the United States, as a percentage of total net sales, were 64% in 2011. We anticipate that sales from international operations will continue to represent a substantial portion of our total sales. In addition, many of our manufacturing facilities and suppliers are located outside of the United States. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

    changes in local medical reimbursement policies and programs;

    changes in foreign regulatory requirements;

    changes in a specific country's or region's political or economic conditions, such as the current financial uncertainties in Europe and changing circumstances in emerging regions;

    trade protection measures, quotas, embargoes, import or export licensing requirements and duties, tariffs or surcharges;

    potentially negative impact of tax laws, including tax costs associated with the repatriation of cash;

    difficulty in staffing and managing global operations;

    cultural, exchange rate or other local factors affecting financial terms with customers;

    local economic and financial conditions affecting the collectability of receivables, including receivables from sovereign entities;

    an outbreak of any life threatening communicable disease;

    economic and political instability and local economic and political conditions;

    differing labor regulations; and

    differing protection of intellectual property.

14


Table of Contents

        Substantially all of our sales outside of the United States are denominated in local currencies. Measured in local currency, a substantial portion of our international sales was generated in Europe (and primarily denominated in the Euro) and in Japan. The United States dollar value of our international sales varies with currency exchange rate fluctuations. Decreases in the value of the United States dollar to the Euro or the Japanese yen have the effect of increasing our reported revenues even when the volume of international sales has remained constant. Increases in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Euro or the Japanese yen, as well as other currencies, have the opposite effect and, if significant, could have a material adverse effect on our reported revenues and results of operations. We have a hedging program for certain currencies that attempts to manage currency exchange rate risks to an acceptable level based on management's judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost; however, this hedging program does not completely eliminate the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations.

        The United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and similar laws in other jurisdictions contain prohibitions against bribery and other illegal payments or for the failure to have procedures in place that prevent such payments. Recent years have seen an increasing number of investigations and other enforcement activities under these laws. Although we have compliance programs in place with respect to these laws, no assurance can be given that a violation will not be found, and if found, the resulting penalties could adversely affect us and our business.

The stock market can be volatile and fluctuations in our quarterly operating results as well as other factors could cause our stock price to decline.

        From time to time the stock market experiences extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility can have a significant effect on the market prices of securities for reasons unrelated to underlying performance. These broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results. In addition, the market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially in response to any of the other risk factors set out above and below, as well as a number of other factors, including the performance of comparable companies or the medical device industry.

        Our sales and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter. A high proportion of our costs are fixed, due in part to significant sales, research and development, and manufacturing costs. Thus, small declines in revenue could disproportionately affect our operating results in a quarter, and the price of our common stock could fall. Other factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include:

    announcements of innovations, new products, strategic developments or business combinations by us or our competitors;

    changes in financial estimates and recommendations of securities analysts;

    demand for and clinical acceptance of products;

    the timing and execution of customer contracts, particularly large contracts that would materially affect our operating results in a given quarter;

    the timing of sales of products and of the introduction of new products;

    the timing or marketing, training, and other expenses related to the introduction of new products;

    the timing of regulatory approvals;

    changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

    delays or problems in introducing new products;

    changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors;

    the timing of approvals of governmental reimbursement rates or changes in reimbursement rates for our products;

15


Table of Contents

    increased expenses, whether related to sales and marketing, raw materials or supplies, product development or administration;

    changes in the level of economic activity in the United States or other regions in which we do business;

    costs related to acquisitions of technologies or businesses; and

    our ability to expand our operations and the amount and timing of expansion-related expenditures.

We face intense competition, and if we do not compete effectively our business will be harmed.

        The cardiovascular medical device industry is highly competitive. We compete with many companies, some of which have longer operating histories, better brand or name recognition, broader product lines and greater access to financial and other resources. Our customers consider many factors when selecting a product, including product reliability, breadth of product line, clinical outcomes, product availability, price, availability and rate of reimbursement, and services provided by the manufacturer. In addition, our ability to compete will depend in large part on our ability to develop and acquire new products and technologies, anticipate technology advances and keep pace with other developers of cardiovascular therapies and technologies. Our competitive position can also be adversely affected by product problems, physician advisories and safety alerts, reflecting the importance of quality in the medical device industry. Market share can shift as a result of any of these factors. See " Competition " under " Business " included herein.

Consolidation in the healthcare industry could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

        The healthcare industry has been consolidating and organizations such as GPOs, independent delivery networks, and large single accounts such as the United States Veterans Administration, continue to consolidate purchasing decisions for many of our healthcare provider customers. As a result, transactions with customers are larger, more complex, and tend to involve more long-term contracts. The purchasing power of these larger customers has increased, and may continue to increase, causing downward pressure on product pricing. If we are not one of the providers selected by one of these organizations, we may be precluded from making sales to its members or participants. Even if we are one of the selected providers, we may be at a disadvantage relative to other selected providers that are able to offer volume discounts based on purchases of a broader range of medical equipment and supplies. Further, we may be required to commit to pricing that has a material adverse effect on our revenues and profit margins, business, financial condition and results of operations. We expect that market demand, governmental regulation, third-party reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide healthcare industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances, which may exert further downward pressure on the prices of our products and could adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our inability to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        Our success and competitive position are dependent in part upon our proprietary intellectual property. We rely on a combination of patents and trade secrets to protect our proprietary intellectual property, and we expect to continue to do so. Although we seek to protect our proprietary rights through a variety of means, we cannot guarantee that the protective steps we have taken are adequate to protect these rights. Patents issued to or licensed by us in the past or in the future may be challenged and held invalid. In addition, as our patents expire, we may be unsuccessful in extending their protection through patent term extensions. The expiration of, or the failure to maintain or extend our patents, could have a material adverse effect on us.

        We also rely on confidentiality agreements with certain employees, consultants and other third parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary information. These agreements could be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for such a breach. In addition, others could independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or gain access to our trade secrets or proprietary information.

16


Table of Contents

        We spend significant resources to enforce our intellectual property rights, sometimes resulting in litigation. Intellectual property litigation is complex and can be expensive and time-consuming. However, our efforts in this regard may not be successful. We may not be able to detect infringement. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies. Patent litigation can result in substantial cost and diversion of effort. Intellectual property protection may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, enabling our competitors to capture increased market position. The invalidation of key intellectual property rights or an unsuccessful outcome in lawsuits filed to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Third parties may claim we are infringing their intellectual property, and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from selling products.

        During recent years, we and our competitors have been involved in substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the medical device industry. From time to time, we have been and may in the future be forced to defend against claims and legal actions alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, and such intellectual property litigation is typically costly and time-consuming. Adverse determinations in any such litigation could result in significant liabilities to third parties or injunctions, or could require us to seek licenses from third parties and, if such licenses are not available on commercially reasonable terms, prevent us from manufacturing, selling or using certain products, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, which could provide our competitors access to the same technologies.

        Third parties could also obtain patents that may require us to either redesign products or, if possible, negotiate licenses from such third parties. Such licenses may materially increase our expenses. If we are unable to redesign products or obtain a license, we might have to exit a particular product offering.

We and our customers are subject to rigorous governmental regulations and we may incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations and develop products that are compatible with these regulations. In addition, failure to comply with these regulations could subject us to substantial sanctions which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        The medical devices we manufacture and market are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities, including regulations that cover the composition, labeling, testing, clinical study, design, manufacturing, packaging, marketing, advertising, promotion and distribution of our products.

        We are required to register with the FDA as a device manufacturer. As a result, we are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the FDA's Quality System Regulation ("QSR") requirements, which require manufacturers of medical devices to adhere to certain regulations, including testing, design, quality control and documentation procedures. The FDA may also inspect our compliance with requirements related to adverse event reporting, recalls or corrections (field actions), the conduct of clinical studies, and other requirements. In the European Union, we are required to maintain certain CE Mark and ISO certifications in order to sell our products, and are subject to periodic inspections by notified bodies to obtain and maintain these certifications. If we or our suppliers fail to adhere to QSR, CE Mark, ISO or similar requirements, this could delay or interrupt product production or sales and/or lead to fines, difficulties in obtaining regulatory clearances, recalls or other consequences, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or prospects.

        Medical devices must receive FDA clearance or approval before they can be commercially marketed in the United States. In addition, the FDA may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the effects of approved products that have been commercialized, and can prevent or limit further marketing of a product based upon the results of post-marketing programs. In addition, the federal Medical Device Reporting regulations require us to provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests

17


Table of Contents

that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or, if a malfunction were to occur, would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. Federal regulations also require us to report certain recalls or corrective actions to the FDA. Furthermore, most major markets for medical devices outside the United States require clearance, approval or compliance with certain standards before a product can be commercially marketed. The process of obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals to market a medical device, particularly from the FDA and certain foreign governmental authorities, can be costly and time-consuming, and clearances or approvals may not be granted for products or product improvements on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in receipt of, or failure to obtain, clearances or approvals for products or product improvements could result in delayed realization of product revenues or in substantial additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations or prospects. At any time after approval of a product for commercial sale, the FDA may conduct periodic inspections to determine compliance with QSR requirements, and/or current Medical Device Reporting regulations, or other regulatory requirements. Noncompliance with applicable requirements may subject the Company or responsible individuals to sanctions including civil money penalties, product seizure, injunction, or criminal prosecution. Additionally, product approvals by the FDA can be withdrawn due to failure to comply with regulatory standards or the occurrence of unforeseen problems following initial approval.

        We are also subject to various United States and international laws pertaining to healthcare pricing and fraud and abuse, including prohibitions on kickbacks and the submission of false claims laws and restrictions on relationships with physicians and other referral sources. These laws are broad in scope and are subject to evolving interpretation, which could require us to incur substantial costs to monitor compliance or to alter our practices if we are found not to be in compliance. Violations of these laws may be punishable by criminal or civil sanctions against the Company and our officers and employees, including substantial fines, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs.

        Despite our implementation of robust compliance processes, we may be subject, from time to time, to inspections, investigations and other enforcement actions by governmental authorities. If we are found not to be in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, the applicable governmental authority can impose fines, delay, suspend, or revoke regulatory clearances or approvals, institute proceedings to detain or seize our products, issue a recall, impose marketing or operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and assess civil penalties against us or our officers or employees, and institute criminal prosecution. Moreover, governmental authorities can ban or request the recall, repair, replacement or refund of the cost of any device or product we manufacture or distribute. Any of the foregoing actions could result in decreased sales as a result of negative publicity and product liability claims, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition to the sanctions for noncompliance described above, commencement of an enforcement proceeding, inspection or investigation could divert substantial management attention from the operation of our business and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our industry is experiencing greater scrutiny and regulation by governmental authorities, which may lead to greater governmental regulation in the future.

        In recent years, the medical device industry has been subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, including by the FDA, numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities, as well as members of Congress. This has included increased regulation, enforcement, inspections, and governmental investigations of the medical device industry and disclosure of financial relationships with health care professionals. We anticipate that the government will continue to scrutinize our industry closely, and that additional regulation by governmental authorities, both foreign and domestic, may increase compliance costs, exposure to litigation and other adverse effects to our operations.

18


Table of Contents

Unsuccessful clinical trials or developmental procedures relating to products under development could have a material adverse effect on our prospects.

        The regulatory approval process for new products and new indications for existing products requires extensive clinical trials and procedures. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from current or future clinical trials conducted by us, our competitors, or third parties, or perceptions regarding this clinical data, could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary approvals and the market's view of our future prospects. Such clinical trials are inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance that these trials or procedures will be completed in a timely or cost-effective manner or result in a commercially viable product. Failure to successfully complete these trials or procedures in a timely and cost-effective manner could have a material adverse effect on our prospects. Clinical trials may experience significant setbacks even after earlier trials have shown promising results. Further, preliminary results from clinical trials may be contradicted by subsequent clinical analysis. In addition, results from our clinical trials or procedures may not be supported by actual long-term studies or clinical experience. If preliminary clinical results are later contradicted, or if initial results cannot be supported by actual long-term studies or clinical experience, our business could be adversely affected. Clinical trials may be suspended or terminated by us, the FDA or other regulatory authorities at any time if it is believed that the trial participants face unacceptable health risks.

We are subject to risks arising from concerns and/or regulatory actions relating to "mad cow disease."

        Certain of our products, including pericardial tissue valves, are manufactured using bovine tissue. Concerns relating to the potential transmission of BSE, commonly known as "mad cow disease," from cows to humans may result in reduced acceptance of products containing bovine materials. Certain medical device regulatory agencies have considered whether to continue to permit the sale of medical devices that incorporate bovine material. We obtain bovine tissue only from closely controlled sources within the United States and Australia. The bovine tissue used in our pericardial tissue valves is from tissue types considered by global health and regulatory organizations to have shown no risk of infectibility for the suspected BSE infectious agent. We have not experienced any significant adverse impact on our sales as a result of concerns regarding BSE, but no assurance can be given that such an impact may not occur in the future.

If third-party payors decline to reimburse our customers for our products or impose other cost containment measures to reduce reimbursement levels, our ability to profitably sell our products will be harmed.

        We sell our products and technologies to hospitals, doctors and other health care providers, all of which receive reimbursement for the health care services provided to patients from third-party payors, such as government programs (both domestic and international), private insurance plans and managed care programs. The ability of customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for their products from private and governmental third-party payors is critical to the success of medical technology companies. The availability of reimbursement affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. Reimbursement varies from country to country and can significantly impact acceptance of new products.

        Hospital reimbursement in the United States for TAVR procedures is currently aligned with surgical aortic valve replacement codes. In September 2011, CMS initiated a national coverage analysis for TAVR, which was expected to lead to a NCD. In February 2012, CMS issued a draft NCD, and a final NCD is expected by mid-year 2012. We believe a well-written NCD that ensures adequate patient access would be positive for patients and physicians. We cannot predict the outcome of this process, and a negative determination, such as one that restricts the use of our products, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        Third-party payors are increasingly attempting to contain health care costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for medical products and services. There can be no assurance that levels of reimbursement, if any, will not be decreased in the future, or that future legislation, regulation or reimbursement policies of third-party payors will not otherwise adversely affect the demand for and price

19


Table of Contents

levels of our products. The introduction of cost containment incentives, combined with closer scrutiny of health care expenditures by both private health insurers and employers, has resulted in increased discounts and contractual adjustments to hospital charges for services performed. Hospitals or physicians may respond to such cost-containment pressures by substituting lower cost products or other therapies. In addition, the 2010 United States healthcare law could adversely affect reimbursement levels for our products, or otherwise adversely affect our product pricing and profitability.

        Initiatives to limit the growth of health care costs, including price regulation, are underway in several countries around the world. In many countries, customers are reimbursed for our products under a government operated insurance system. Under such a system, the government periodically reviews reimbursement levels and may limit patient access. If a government were to decide to reduce reimbursement levels, our product pricing could be adversely affected.

        Third-party payors may deny reimbursement if they determine that a device used in a procedure was not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by such third-party payors, or was used for an unapproved indication. Third-party payors may also deny reimbursement for experimental procedures and devices. We believe that many of our existing products are cost-effective, even though the one-time cost may be significant, because they are intended to reduce overall health care costs over a long period of time. We cannot be certain that these third-party payors will recognize these cost savings instead of merely focusing on the lower initial costs associated with competing therapies. If our products are not considered cost-effective by third-party payors, our customers may not be reimbursed for them, resulting in lower sales of our products.

Use of our products in unapproved circumstances could expose us to liabilities.

        The marketing approval from the FDA and other regulators of certain of our products are, or are expected to be, limited to specific indications. We are prohibited by law from marketing or promoting any unapproved use of our products. Physicians, however, can use these products in ways or circumstances other than those strictly within the scope of the regulatory approval. Although the product training we provide to physicians and other healthcare professionals is limited to approved uses, no assurance can be given that claims might not be asserted against us if our products are used in ways or for procedures that are not approved.

Our operations are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations that could result in substantial costs.

        Our operations are subject to environmental, health and safety laws, and regulations concerning, among other things, the generation, handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous substances or wastes, the cleanup of hazardous substance releases, and emissions or discharges into the air or water. We have incurred and may incur expenditures in the future in connection with environmental, health and safety laws, and regulations. New laws and regulations, violations of these laws or regulations, stricter enforcement of existing requirements, or the discovery of previously unknown contamination could require us to incur costs or could become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could be material.

The success of many of our products depends upon strong relationships with certain key physicians.

        The development, marketing and sale of many of our products requires us to maintain working relationships with physicians upon whom we rely to provide considerable knowledge and experience. These physicians may assist us as researchers, marketing consultants, product trainers and consultants, inventors and as public speakers. If new laws, regulations or other developments limit our ability to maintain strong relationships with these professionals or to continue to receive their advice and input, the development and marketing of our products could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

20


Table of Contents


Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

Item 2.    Properties

        The locations and uses of the major properties of Edwards Lifesciences are as follows:

North America        
Irvine, California   (1), (2)   Corporate Headquarters, Research and Development, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs, Manufacturing
Draper, Utah   (2)   Administration, Research and Development, Manufacturing
Haina, Dominican Republic   (2)   Manufacturing
Añasco, Puerto Rico   (2)   Manufacturing

Europe

 

 

 

 
Horw, Switzerland   (2)   Manufacturing, Administration
Nyon, Switzerland   (1)   Administration, Marketing

Asia

 

 

 

 
Tokyo, Japan   (2)   Administration, Marketing, Distribution
Changi, Singapore   (2)   Manufacturing, Administration

(1)
Owned property.

(2)
Leased property.

        The Irvine, California lease expires in 2021; the Draper, Utah lease expires in 2025; the Dominican Republic property has one lease that expires in 2012 and one that expires in 2019; the Puerto Rico property has one lease that expires in 2018 and one that expires in 2016; the Horw, Switzerland lease expires in 2013; the Tokyo, Japan lease expires in 2012; and the Changi, Singapore landlease expires in 2036. The Company's properties have been well maintained, are in good operating condition and are adequate for current needs.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

        In February 2008, Edwards Lifesciences filed a lawsuit against CoreValve, Inc. ("CoreValve") in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that its ReValving System infringes three of the Company's U.S. Andersen patents, later narrowed to one patent ("the '552 patent"). CoreValve was acquired by Medtronic, Inc. ("Medtronic") in April 2009. In April 2010, a federal jury found that patent to be valid and found that CoreValve willfully infringes it. The jury also awarded Edwards $73.9 million in damages. In February 2011, the District Court reaffirmed the jury decision and ruled that Edwards is entitled to recover additional damages due to CoreValve's continued infringing sales from the trial through the life of the patent, plus interest. In the same ruling, the court denied Edwards' motions for a permanent injunction, as well as its motion for increased damages relating to CoreValve's willful infringement. Both Edwards and CoreValve have appealed. A second lawsuit is pending in the same court against CoreValve and Medtronic alleging infringement of three U.S. Andersen patents. In September 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") granted Medtronic's third request to reexamine the validity of the claim of the '552 patent and in July 2011 confirmed the validity of that patent.

        In June 2011, Medtronic filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging that certain surgical valve holders and a surgical embolic filter device infringe its patents. Edwards counterclaimed against Medtronic, alleging that the Medtronic Contour 3D annuloplasty ring infringes an Edwards ring patent. By the Order of a Magistrate Judge in January 2012, the lawsuit has been stayed pending the outcome of future reexamination findings by the USPTO.

21


Table of Contents

        In June 2011, Medtronic also filed another lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging that the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve infringes a Medtronic patent. Edwards counterclaimed against Medtronic, alleging that the Medtronic CoreValve heart valve infringes Edwards' U.S. Letac-Cribier transcatheter heart valve patent. Edwards' counterclaim was subsequently transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

        In March and September 2010, the Company received grand jury subpoenas for documents from the United States Attorney's Office in the Central District of California in connection with an investigation by the FDA. The subpoenas to the Company seek records relating to the Vigilance I Monitor model with software release 5.3 that was the subject of a voluntary field recall by the Company in June 2006. The Company is cooperating fully with the investigation.

        In addition, Edwards Lifesciences is or may be a party to, or may otherwise be responsible for, pending or threatened lawsuits related primarily to products and services currently or formerly manufactured or performed, as applicable, by Edwards Lifesciences. Such cases and claims raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the facts and circumstances of each particular case or claim, the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought, and differences in applicable law. Upon resolution of any such legal matter or other claim, Edwards Lifesciences may incur charges in excess of established reserves. The Company is not able to estimate the amount or range of any loss for legal contingencies for which there is no reserve or additional loss for matters already reserved. While any such charge could have a material adverse impact on Edwards Lifesciences' net income or cash flows in the period in which it is recorded or paid, management does not believe that any such charge relating to any currently pending lawsuit would have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

        Edwards Lifesciences is subject to various environmental laws and regulations both within and outside of the United States. The operations of Edwards Lifesciences, like those of other medical device companies, involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. While it is difficult to quantify the potential impact of continuing compliance with environmental protection laws, management believes that such compliance will not have a material impact on Edwards Lifesciences' financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

        Not applicable.

22


Table of Contents


PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Price

        The principal market for Edwards Lifesciences' common stock is the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock as reported by the NYSE.

 
  2011   2010  
 
  High   Low   High   Low  

Calendar Quarter Ended:

                         

March 31

  $ 91.82   $ 77.26   $ 50.99   $ 42.31  

June 30

    90.38     80.44     56.44     46.58  

September 30

    91.50     61.63     69.29     53.10  

December 31

    77.40     61.59     85.47     63.23  

Number of Stockholders

        On January 31, 2012 there were 18,026 stockholders of record of Edwards Lifesciences' common stock.

Dividends

        Edwards Lifesciences has never paid any cash dividends on its capital stock and has no current plans to pay any cash dividends. The current policy of Edwards Lifesciences is to retain any future earnings for use in the business of the Company.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Calendar Month Ended
  Total Number
of Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Unit)
  Total Number
of Shares (or
Units) Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
(in millions)(a)
 

October 31, 2011

    295,000   $ 71.18     295,000   $ 616.9  

November 30, 2011

    263,000     72.21     263,000     597.9  

December 31, 2011

                597.9  
                       

Total

    558,000     71.66     558,000        
                       

(a)
On February 11, 2010, the Company approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to $500.0 million of the Company's common stock. On September 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to an additional $500.0 million of the Company's common stock.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

        The following table sets forth selected financial information with respect to Edwards Lifesciences. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Edwards Lifesciences' "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Consolidated Financial Statements" found elsewhere in this Form 10-K. See Note 3 to the "Consolidated Financial Statements" and "Management's

23


Table of Contents

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for discussions of the effect of certain transactions on Edwards Lifesciences' operations.

 
   
  As of or for the Years Ended December 31,  
 
   
  2011   2010   2009   2008   2007  
 
   
  (in millions, except per share data)
 

OPERATING RESULTS

 

Net sales

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4   $ 1,237.7   $ 1,091.1  

 

Gross profit

    1,188.8     1,038.7     922.3     818.1     712.9  

 

Net income(a)

    236.7     218.0     229.1     128.9     113.0  

BALANCE SHEET DATA

 

Total assets

  $ 1,980.5   $ 1,767.2   $ 1,615.5   $ 1,400.2   $ 1,349.8  

 

Long-term debt and lease obligations(b)

    150.4         90.3     175.5     61.7  

COMMON STOCK INFORMATION

 

Net income per common share(a):

                               

 

    Basic

  $ 2.07   $ 1.92   $ 2.04   $ 1.15   $ 0.99  

 

    Diluted

    1.98     1.83     1.95     1.10     0.93  

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

                     

(a)
See Note 3 to the "Consolidated Financial Statements" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for additional information regarding special charges (gains), net, of $21.6 million, $22.7 million and $(63.8) million during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(b)
The Company's Five-Year Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement ("the Credit Agreement") matured on September 29, 2011. At December 31, 2010, all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement were classified as short-term obligations as these obligations were due within one year. In July 2011, the Company entered into a new Four-Year Credit Agreement ("the Credit Facility"). All amounts outstanding under the new Credit Facility have been classified as long-term as the obligations are expected to be refinanced on a long-term basis under the Credit Facility.

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        The following discussion and analysis presents the factors that had a material effect on the results of operations of Edwards Lifesciences during the three years ended December 31, 2011. Also discussed is Edwards Lifesciences' financial position as of December 31, 2011. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Overview

        Edwards Lifesciences Corporation is a global leader in the science of heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring. Driven by a passion to help patients, the Company partners with clinicians to develop innovative technologies in the areas of structural heart disease and critical care monitoring that enable them to save and enhance lives.

        The products and technologies provided by Edwards Lifesciences are categorized into four main areas: Heart Valve Therapy; Critical Care; Cardiac Surgery Systems; and Vascular.

        Edwards Lifesciences' Heart Valve Therapy portfolio is comprised of tissue heart valves and heart valve repair products. A pioneer in the development and commercialization of heart valve products, Edwards Lifesciences is the world's leading manufacturer of tissue heart valves and repair products used to replace or repair a patient's diseased or defective heart valve. In the Critical Care area, Edwards Lifesciences is a world

24


Table of Contents

leader in hemodynamic monitoring systems used to measure a patient's cardiovascular function. Prior to September 2009, Edwards Lifesciences provided products for continuous renal replacement therapy ("hemofiltration product line"). The Company sold the hemofiltration product line in September 2009. The Company's Cardiac Surgery Systems portfolio comprises a diverse line of products for use during cardiac surgery including cannulae, embolic protection devices and other products used during cardiopulmonary bypass and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Edwards Lifesciences' Vascular portfolio includes a line of balloon catheter-based products, surgical clips and inserts. Edwards Lifesciences manufactured and sold LifeStent balloon-expandable and self-expanding non-coronary stents until the sale of this product line in January 2008. The Company continued to manufacture these products for the buyer until September 2009 when manufacturing was transferred to the buyer.

        The healthcare marketplace continues to be competitive with strong global and local competitors. The Company competes with many companies, ranging from small start-up enterprises to companies that are larger and more established than Edwards Lifesciences with access to significant financial resources. Furthermore, rapid product development and technological change characterize the market in which the Company competes. Global demand for healthcare is increasing as the population ages. There is mounting pressure to contain healthcare costs in the face of this increasing demand, which has resulted in pricing and market share pressures. The cardiovascular segment of the medical device industry is dynamic, and technology, cost-of-care considerations, regulatory reform, industry and customer consolidation, and evolving patient needs are expected to continue to drive change.

        In 2010, significant reforms to the healthcare system were adopted as law in the United States. The law includes provisions that, among other things, reduce or limit Medicare reimbursement, require all individuals to have health insurance (with limited exceptions) and impose increased taxes. Specifically, the law requires the medical device industry to subsidize healthcare reform in the form of a 2.3% excise tax on United States sales of most medical devices beginning in 2013. The excise tax will increase the Company's operating expenses. Because many parts of the 2010 healthcare law remain subject to implementation, the long-term impact on the Company is uncertain. The new law or any future legislation could reduce medical procedure volumes, lower reimbursement for the Company's products, and impact the demand for the Company's products or the prices at which the Company sells its products.

Results of Operations

    Net Sales by Major Regions
    (dollars in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,   Change   Percent
Change
 
 
  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010   2011   2010  

United States

  $ 605.6   $ 567.6   $ 556.1   $ 38.0   $ 11.5     6.7 %   2.1 %
                                   

Europe

    574.0     457.0     404.6     117.0     52.4     25.6 %   13.0 %

Japan

    283.7     247.8     214.1     35.9     33.7     14.5 %   15.7 %

Rest of World

    215.3     174.6     146.6     40.7     28.0     23.3 %   19.1 %
                                   

International

    1,073.0     879.4     765.3     193.6     114.1     22.0 %   14.9 %
                                   

Total net sales

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4   $ 231.6   $ 125.6     16.0 %   9.5 %
                                   

        The $38.0 million increase in net sales in the United States in 2011 was due primarily to:

    Heart Valve Therapy products, which increased net sales by $28.5 million, driven primarily by (1) sales of the Edwards SAPIEN and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valves for clinical trials and commercial sales resulting from the United States launch in the fourth quarter of 2011, and (2) the

25


Table of Contents

      Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Aortic Ease and Magna Mitral Ease valves (launched in the third quarter of 2010); and

    Critical Care products, which increased net sales by $11.2 million, driven primarily by the FloTrac minimally invasive monitoring system and pressure monitoring products.

        The $193.6 million increase in international net sales in 2011 was due primarily to:

    Heart Valve Therapy products, which increased net sales by $104.3 million, driven primarily by commercial sales of the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve and the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Aortic Ease valve;

    Critical Care products, which increased net sales by $20.9 million, driven primarily by pressure monitoring products and the FloTrac minimally invasive monitoring system; and

    foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $58.0 million, due to the strengthening of various currencies against the United States dollar, primarily the Euro and the Japanese yen.

        The $11.5 million increase in net sales in the United States in 2010 was due primarily to:

    Heart Valve Therapy products, which increased net sales by $9.7 million, driven primarily by the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Aortic Ease valve (launched in the second quarter of 2009), Magna Mitral Ease valve (launched in the third quarter of 2010), Physio II ring (launched in the first quarter of 2009), and sales of the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve for clinical trials;

    Critical Care products, which increased net sales by $5.7 million, driven primarily by the FloTrac minimally invasive monitoring system; and

    Cardiac Surgery Systems products, which increased net sales by $2.7 million, driven primarily by the minimally invasive surgery ("MIS") product line;

        partially offset by:

    the discontinuance of manufacturing in September 2009 of the divested LifeStent product line, which decreased net sales by $8.2 million.

        The $114.1 million increase in international net sales in 2010 was due primarily to:

    Heart Valve Therapy products, which increased net sales by $112.6 million, driven primarily by the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve, the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valve and the new Carpentier-Edwards Physio II ring, which was launched in Europe in the first quarter of 2009 and in Japan in the first quarter of 2010;

    Critical Care products, which increased net sales by $18.1 million, driven primarily by the FloTrac minimally invasive monitoring system and pressure monitoring products;

    Cardiac Surgery Systems products, which increased net sales by $4.1 million, driven primarily by specialty cannula products; and

    foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $8.6 million, due to the strengthening of various currencies against the United States dollar, primarily the Japanese yen, partially offset by the weakening of the Euro against the United States dollar;

        partially offset by:

    hemofiltration products, which decreased net sales by $32.0 million. The Company sold its hemofiltration product line in September 2009. For more information see " Special Charges (Gains), net. "

26


Table of Contents

        The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on net sales is not necessarily indicative of the impact on net income due to the corresponding effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on international manufacturing and operating costs and the Company's hedging activities. For more information see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

    Net Sales by Product Line
    (dollars in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,   Change   Percent
Change
 
 
  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010   2011   2010  

Heart Valve Therapy

  $ 1,010.7   $ 838.3   $ 714.9   $ 172.4   $ 123.4     20.6 %   17.3 %

Critical Care

    508.3     454.1     452.5     54.2     1.6     11.9 %   0.4 %

Cardiac Surgery Systems

    107.5     100.2     92.8     7.3     7.4     7.3 %   8.0 %

Vascular

    52.1     54.4     61.2     (2.3 )   (6.8 )   (4.4 )%   (11.1 )%
                                   

Total net sales

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4   $ 231.6   $ 125.6     16.0 %   9.5 %
                                   

    Heart Valve Therapy

        The $172.4 million increase in net sales of Heart Valve Therapy products in 2011 was due primarily to:

    transcatheter heart valves, which increased net sales by $111.7 million primarily as a result of the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve;

    surgical heart valves, which increased net sales by $21.1 million, primarily as a result of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Aortic Ease and Magna Mitral Ease valves; and

    foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $33.6 million due primarily to the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar.

        The $123.4 million increase in net sales of Heart Valve Therapy products in 2010 was due primarily to:

    the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve, which increased net sales by $99.0 million; and

    pericardial tissue valves, which increased net sales by $26.2 million, primarily as a result of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Aortic Ease valve.

        In November 2011, the Company received approval from the FDA for the transfemoral delivery of the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve for treatment of certain inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company received regulatory approval and initiated its launch of the Carpentier-Edwards Physio Tricuspid annuloplasty ring in the United States and Europe. In Japan, the Company obtained approval of its Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Aortic Ease valve in July 2011, and introduced this product in the third quarter of 2011. In Europe, the Company received CE Mark in February 2012 for EDWARDS INTUITY , its minimally invasive aortic valve surgery system.

    Critical Care

        The $54.2 million increase in net sales of Critical Care products in 2011 was due primarily to:

    pressure monitoring products, which increased net sales by $15.4 million;

    advanced monitoring products, led by FloTrac systems, which increased net sales by $13.1 million, and the EV1000 Clinical Platform , which increased net sales by $5.7 million; and

27


Table of Contents

    foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $19.4 million, due primarily to the strengthening of the Euro and Japanese yen against the United States dollar.

        The $1.6 million increase in net sales of Critical Care products in 2010 was due primarily to:

    advanced monitoring products, led by FloTrac systems, which increased net sales by $14.2 million, and PreSep , the Company's continuous central venous oximetry catheter for early detection of sepsis, which increased net sales by $3.3 million;

    pressure monitoring products, which increased net sales by $8.5 million; and

    foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $8.7 million, due primarily to the strengthening of the Japanese yen against the United States dollar;

        partially offset by:

    hemofiltration products, which decreased net sales by $32.3 million. The Company sold its hemofiltration product line in September 2009.

    Cardiac Surgery Systems

        The $7.3 million increase in net sales of Cardiac Surgery Systems products in 2011 was due primarily to specialty cannula products, which increased net sales by $3.1 million, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased net sales by $2.8 million due primarily to the strengthening of the Euro and the Japanese yen against the United States dollar.

        The $7.4 million increase in net sales of Cardiac Surgery Systems products in 2010 was due primarily to MIS products, which increased net sales by $3.7 million, and specialty cannula products, which increased net sales by $3.1 million.

        During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company obtained CE Mark and 510(k) clearance for its IntraClude aortic occlusion device. IntraClude is the first of several new products that the Company expects to introduce in its MIS portfolio.

    Vascular

        The $2.3 million decrease in net sales of Vascular products in 2011 was due primarily to the Company's discontinued distribution of artificial implantable grafts during the first quarter of 2011.

        The $6.8 million decrease in net sales of Vascular products in 2010 was due primarily to the discontinuance of manufacturing in September 2009 of the divested LifeStent product line.

    Gross Profit

 
  Years Ended December 31,   Change  
 
  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010  

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales

    70.8 %   71.8 %   69.8 %   (1.0 ) pts.   2.0 pts.

        The 1.0 percentage point decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales in 2011 was driven by:

    a 1.3 percentage point decrease due to the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, including the outcome of foreign currency hedging contracts; and

    investments in the expansion of the Company's international manufacturing capacity in preparation for its transcatheter heart valve launch in the United States;

28


Table of Contents

        partially offset by:

    a 0.5 percentage point increase in international markets due to a more profitable international product mix, primarily higher sales of transcatheter heart valves; and

    a 0.3 percentage point increase in the United States due to a more profitable product mix, primarily higher sales of Heart Valve Therapy products, including transcatheter heart valves, and Critical Care products.

        The 2.0 percentage point increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales in 2010 was driven by:

    a 1.5 percentage point increase due to a more profitable international product mix, primarily higher sales of transcatheter heart valves and the divestiture of the hemofiltration product line, and the favorable impact of manufacturing performance; and

    a 0.5 percentage point increase primarily due to the favorable impact of manufacturing performance in the United States.

    Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses
    (dollars in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,   Change  
 
  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010  

SG&A expenses

  $ 642.4   $ 550.0   $ 508.8   $ 92.4   $ 41.2  

SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales

    38.3 %   38.0 %   38.5 %   0.3  pts.   (0.5 )pts.

        The $92.4 million increase in SG&A expenses in 2011 was due primarily to higher sales and marketing expenses in the United States and Europe, mainly to support the transcatheter heart valve program, including the launch in the United States. Foreign currency rate fluctuations increased SG&A expenses by $21.3 million due to the strengthening of various currencies against the United States dollar, primarily the Euro and the Japanese yen.

        The $41.2 million increase in SG&A expenses in 2010 was primarily in Europe due to (1) higher sales and marketing expenses, primarily to support the transcatheter heart valve program, and (2) higher sales-related spending in the Critical Care and Surgical Heart Valve Therapy product lines. Foreign currency had an unfavorable impact of $2.7 million, primarily due to the strengthening of various currencies against the United States dollar, primarily the Japanese yen, partially offset by the weakening of the Euro against the United States dollar.

    Research and Development Expenses
    (dollars in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,   Change  
 
  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010  

Research and development expenses

  $ 246.3   $ 204.4   $ 175.5   $ 41.9   $ 28.9  

Research and development expenses as a percentage of net sales

    14.7 %   14.1 %   13.3 %   0.6 pts.   0.8 pts.

        The increase in research and development expenses in 2011 was due primarily to additional investments in clinical studies and new product development efforts in the transcatheter heart valve program.

        The increase in research and development expenses in 2010 was due to additional investments in all major product lines, primarily the transcatheter heart valve program.

29


Table of Contents

        The following are the developments related to the Company's transcatheter heart valve program:

    the Company received conditional IDE approval from the FDA in March 2007 to initiate The PARTNER Trial, a pivotal clinical trial of the Company's Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve technology. The PARTNER Trial, which has two study arms, evaluated the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve in patients who are considered at high risk for conventional open-heart valve surgery. In the first study arm ("Cohort A"), patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to either high risk surgery or the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve. In the second study arm ("Cohort B"), patients who were deemed non-operable were randomized 1:1 to medical management or the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve. In addition, the Company received FDA approval for non-randomized continued access for all of its existing PARTNER sites. During 2010, positive one-year data from Cohort B was published and the Company completed the submission of its pre-market approval application ("PMA") to the FDA. In November 2011, the Company received approval from the FDA for the transfemoral delivery of the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve for treatment of certain inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company announced that one-year Cohort A trial data met all its primary endpoints and submitted its PMA for Cohort A to the FDA;

    in the United States, the Company submitted an IDE for the Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve in October 2009. The PARTNER II trial will evaluate the Edwards SAPIEN XT with both the NovaFlex and Ascendra2 delivery systems. In February 2011, the Company received conditional IDE approval from the FDA for the first pivotal cohort of the PARTNER II trial ("PARTNER II Cohort B"). PARTNER II Cohort B is a study of up to 600 inoperable patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis using a 1:1 randomization of the Edwards SAPIEN XT with the NovaFlex transfemoral delivery system versus the Edwards SAPIEN with the RetroFlex 3 delivery system. In January 2012, the Company completed enrollment in this cohort of inoperable patients. In November 2011, the Company received conditional IDE approval from the FDA for the second planned cohort ("PARTNER II Cohort A"). PARTNER II Cohort A is a non-inferiority study of up to 2,000 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis who have an elevated risk for traditional open-heart surgery. Patients will be evenly randomized to receive the Edwards SAPIEN XT valve or surgery. Those undergoing transcatheter valve replacement will be treated either transfemorally or transapically;

    in Japan, the Company began enrolling patients in a clinical trial with its SAPIEN XT valve, called PREVAIL JAPAN, during 2010. The PREVAIL JAPAN clinical trial will evaluate SAPIEN XT with both the transfemoral and transapical delivery systems. The Company believes that successful trial completion could result in an approval as early as 2013; and

    in Europe, the Company expects to commence clinical trials in 2012 for SAPIEN 3 , its next generation balloon-expandable valve that includes a unique feature to further reduce parvalvular leak, and CENTERA , its repositionable, self-expanding valve featuring a motorized delivery system designed for stable deployment and single operator use.

30


Table of Contents

    Special Charges (Gains), net
    (in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

European receivables

  $ 12.8   $   $  

Realignment expenses

    5.5     7.2      

Settlements and litigation

    3.3         3.8  

MONARC program discontinuation

        8.3      

Investment impairment

        7.2     1.6  

Gain on sale of assets, net

            (86.9 )

Charitable fund contribution

            15.0  

Adjustment to capitalized patent enforcement costs

            3.7  

Reserve reversal

            (1.0 )
               

Total special charges (gains), net

  $ 21.6   $ 22.7   $ (63.8 )
               

    European Receivables

        During 2011, the Company recorded a $12.8 million charge to reflect the increased risk associated with its southern European receivables, primarily Greece.

    Realignment Expenses

        In December 2011, the Company recorded a $5.5 million charge related primarily to severance expenses associated with a global workforce realignment impacting 49 employees. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's remaining severance obligations of $5.2 million are expected to be substantially paid by March 2013.

        In December 2010, the Company recorded a $7.2 million charge related primarily to severance expenses associated with a global workforce realignment impacting 84 employees. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's remaining severance obligations of $1.2 million are expected to be substantially paid by June 2012.

    Settlements and Litigation

        In December 2011, the Company recorded a $3.3 million charge related to a litigation settlement.

        In September 2009, the Company recorded a $3.8 million charge for litigation related to a royalty dispute in connection with a product in the Company's Cardiac Surgery Systems product line.

    MONARC Program Discontinuation

        During the second quarter of 2010, the Company decided to discontinue its MONARC transcatheter mitral valve program due to slow enrollment in the EVOLUTION II trial. As a result, the Company recorded an $8.3 million charge consisting of a $7.6 million impairment of intangible assets associated with the program and $0.7 million of clinical trial costs that will continue to be incurred under a contractual obligation that existed prior to the discontinuation date.

    Investment Impairment

        During 2010, the Company recorded a $7.2 million charge related to the other-than-temporary impairment of certain of its investments in unconsolidated affiliates. The Company concluded that the impairment of these investments was other-than-temporary based upon the continuing duration and severity of the impairment.

31


Table of Contents

        In September 2009, the Company recorded a $1.6 million charge related to the other-than-temporary impairment of its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate. The Company concluded that the impairment of its investment was other-than-temporary based upon (a) the continuing duration and severity of the impairment and (b) positive clinical trial developments in the third quarter of 2009 which failed to raise the quoted market price of the affiliate's stock to the Company's carrying value.

    Gain on Sale of Assets, net

        In September 2009, the Company sold its hemofiltration product line. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received a cash payment of $55.9 million, and was entitled to earn-out payments up to $9.0 million based on certain revenue objectives to be achieved by the buyer over the two years following the sale. As of March 31, 2011, all earn-out payments had been earned. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $43.6 million consisting of the cash proceeds of $55.9 million, offset by $8.5 million related to the net book value of inventory, fixed assets and intangible assets that were sold, satisfaction of a $0.6 million receivable, a $0.5 million write-off of goodwill associated with this product line and $2.7 million of transaction and other costs related to the sale. In connection with this transaction, the Company also recorded a $1.5 million charge in June 2009 for transaction costs and employee severance.

        In March 2009, the Company recorded a $2.8 million gain related to the sale of its distribution rights in Europe for a specialty vascular graft.

        In January 2008, the Company sold certain assets related to the Edwards LifeStent peripheral vascular product line. During 2009, under the terms of the sale agreement, the Company received $42.0 million in milestone payments.

    Charitable Fund Contribution

        In September 2009, the Company contributed $15.0 million to The Edwards Lifesciences Fund, a donor-advised fund intended to provide philanthropic support to cardiovascular and community related charitable causes. The contribution was an irrevocable contribution to a third party, and was recorded as an expense at the time of payment.

    Adjustment to Capitalized Patent Enforcement Costs

        In December 2009, the Company recorded a $3.7 million charge for the write-off of capitalized patent enforcement costs related to litigation in Europe for which success was no longer deemed probable.

    Reserve Reversal

        During 2004, the Company discontinued its Lifepath AAA endovascular graft program. In March 2009, upon completion of its remaining clinical obligations related to this program, the Company reversed its remaining $1.0 million clinical reserve.

    Interest Expense

        Interest expense was $3.1 million, $2.4 million and $2.7 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $0.7 million increase in interest expense for 2011 resulted primarily from a higher average debt balance as compared to the prior year. The $0.3 million decrease in interest expense for 2010 resulted primarily from prior year interest expense related to a sales and use tax audit settlement, partially offset by a higher average debt balance as compared to the prior year.

    Interest Income

        Interest income was $3.4 million, $0.9 million and $1.6 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $2.5 million increase in interest income for 2011 resulted primarily from higher investment returns. The

32


Table of Contents

$0.7 million decrease in interest income for 2010 resulted primarily from lower average interest rates, partially offset by higher balances of cash and cash equivalents.

    Other Income, net
    (in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Gains on investments in unconsolidated affiliates

  $ (5.4 ) $ (0.8 ) $ (1.2 )

Foreign exchange losses (gains), net

    1.9     (0.2 )   (2.3 )

Earn-out payments

    (1.0 )   (6.0 )   (2.1 )

Other

    (0.3 )   (1.1 )   1.9  
               

Total other income, net

  $ (4.8 ) $ (8.1 ) $ (3.7 )
               

        The gains on investments in unconsolidated affiliates primarily represents the Company's net share of gains and losses in investments accounted for under the equity method, and realized gains and losses on the Company's available-for-sale and cost method investments.

        The foreign exchange losses (gains) relate to the foreign currency fluctuations in the Company's global trade and intercompany receivable and payable balances. Foreign exchange fluctuations (primarily related to United States dollar payables in non-United States dollar functional currency locations) resulted in a net loss in 2011.

        In September 2009, the Company sold its hemofiltration product line. In connection with the transaction, the Company was entitled to earn-out payments up to $9.0 million based on certain revenue objectives to be achieved by the buyer over the two years following the sale. As of March 31, 2011, all earn-out payments had been earned.

    Provision for Income Taxes

        The Company's effective income tax rates for 2011, 2010 and 2009 were impacted as follows (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Income tax expense at U.S. federal statutory rate

  $ 99.2   $ 93.9   $ 106.5  

Foreign income tax at different rates

    (57.4 )   (28.1 )   (27.9 )

U.S. tax on foreign earnings, net of credits

    11.8     2.2     1.0  

Tax credits, federal and state

    (10.4 )   (7.8 )   (5.5 )

State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit

    4.6     4.1     4.9  

Release of reserve for uncertain tax positions for prior years

    (4.1 )   (13.4 )   (3.8 )

Nondeductible stock-based compensation

    1.9     1.9     1.4  

Other

    1.3     (2.6 )   (1.3 )
               

Income tax provision

  $ 46.9   $ 50.2   $ 75.3  
               

    Reserve for Uncertain Tax Positions

        As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was $78.0 million and $55.1 million, respectively. The Company estimates that these liabilities would be reduced by $6.8 million and $4.7 million, respectively, from offsetting tax benefits associated with the

33


Table of Contents

correlative effects of potential transfer pricing adjustments, state income taxes and timing adjustments. The net amounts of $71.2 million and $50.4 million, respectively, if not required, would favorably affect the Company's effective tax rate.

        A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, penalties and foreign exchange, is as follows (in millions):

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Unrecognized tax benefits, January 1

  $ 55.1   $ 47.1   $ 35.9  

Current year tax positions

    26.0     20.8     15.7  

Increase prior period tax positions

    5.9     8.6     8.9  

Decrease prior period tax positions

    (5.5 )   (20.1 )   (9.4 )

Settlements

    (0.1 )   (0.1 )   (3.6 )

Lapse of statutes of limitations

    (3.4 )   (1.2 )   (0.4 )
               

Unrecognized tax benefits, December 31

  $ 78.0   $ 55.1   $ 47.1  
               

        The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had accrued $2.0 million (net of $1.2 million tax benefit) of interest related to uncertain tax positions, and as of December 31, 2010, the Company had accrued $1.7 million (net of $1.4 million tax benefit) of interest related to uncertain tax positions.

        The Company strives to resolve open matters with each tax authority at the examination level and could reach agreement with a tax authority at any time. While the Company has accrued for matters it believes are more likely than not to require settlement, the final outcome with a tax authority may result in a tax liability that is more or less than that reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, the Company may later decide to challenge any assessments, if made, and may exercise its right to appeal. The uncertain tax positions are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as events occur that affect potential liabilities for additional taxes, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, proposed assessments by tax authorities, negotiations between tax authorities, identification of new issues and issuance of new legislation, regulations or case law. Management believes that adequate amounts of tax and related penalty and interest have been provided in income tax expense for any adjustments that may result from these uncertain tax positions.

        At December 31, 2011, all material state, local and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006. The Internal Revenue Service has completed its examination of the Company's 2007 and 2008 tax years for all matters except for certain transfer pricing issues. The appeals process for those transfer pricing issues is on-going. The Internal Revenue Service began its examination of the 2009 and 2010 tax years during the second quarter of 2011. As a result of on-going negotiations of an Advanced Pricing Agreement between Switzerland and the United States, the expiration of statutes of limitations, and the possible settlement of on-going audits in several jurisdictions for multiple years throughout the world, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next 12 months. The range of such change could vary, but the amount of such change is not expected to be material.

        In February 2009, California enacted tax legislation which was effective beginning 2011. The impact of the new legislation has been considered in determining the Company's tax provision for 2011, including the realizability of its California research and development credit carryforward.

        The Company has received tax incentives in Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Singapore and Switzerland. The tax reductions as compared to the local statutory rates favorably impacted earnings per diluted share for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 by $0.40, $0.34 and $0.31, respectively. The Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Singapore and Switzerland grants provide the Company's manufacturing operations partial or full exemption from local taxes until the years 2013, 2017, 2024 and 2015, respectively. The Company is engaged in negotiations with the Puerto Rican government for an

34


Table of Contents

extension of the Puerto Rico grant. The Singapore grant was extended during 2011 for an additional five years and will now terminate in 2024.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The Company's sources of cash liquidity include cash on hand and cash equivalents, short-term investments (bank time deposits with original maturities over three months but less than one year), amounts available under credit facilities and cash from operations. The Company believes that these sources are sufficient to fund the current requirements of working capital, capital expenditures and other financial commitments. The Company further believes that it has the financial flexibility to attract long-term capital to fund short-term and long-term growth objectives. However, no assurances can be given that such long-term capital will be available to the Company on favorable terms, or at all.

        As of December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held outside the United States were approximately $409.2 million, and have historically been used to fund international operations. The Company believes that cash held in the United States, in addition to amounts available under credit facilities and cash from operations, are sufficient to fund its United States operating requirements. The majority of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held outside the United States relate to undistributed earnings of certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries which are considered to be indefinitely reinvested by the Company. Repatriations of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held outside the United States are subject to restrictions in certain jurisdictions and may be subject to withholding and other taxes. The potential tax liability related to any repatriation would be dependent on the facts and circumstances that would exist at the time such repatriation is made and the complexities of the tax laws of the United States and the respective foreign jurisdictions.

        In July 2011, Edwards Lifesciences entered into a Four-Year Credit Agreement ("the Credit Facility") which matures on July 29, 2015. The proceeds of the Credit Facility were used to refinance the Company's previous Five-Year Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement ("the Credit Agreement"). The Credit Facility provides up to an aggregate of $500.0 million in borrowings in multiple currencies. Borrowings generally bear interest at the London interbank offering rate ("LIBOR") plus 0.875%, subject to adjustment for leverage ratio changes as defined in the Credit Facility. The Company also pays a facility fee of 0.125% on the entire $500.0 million facility whether or not drawn. The facility fee is also subject to adjustment for leverage ratio changes. As of December 31, 2011, borrowings of $150.4 million were outstanding under the Credit Facility and have been classified as long-term obligations as these borrowings are expected to be refinanced pursuant to the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is unsecured and contains various financial and other covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2011, the Company was in violation of certain covenants as a result of the Company's restatement of its 2011 interim consolidated condensed financial statements. See Note 20 to the "Consolidated Financial Statements" for further information. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Company obtained a waiver for this noncompliance from the lenders.

        In March 2011, the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Embrella Cardiovascular, Inc. ("Embrella"), including shares already owned by the Company, for an aggregate purchase price of $42.6 million. The purchase price was funded with cash on hand and borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Embrella was a start-up medical device company developing a device for cerebral embolic protection during cardiovascular procedures.

        In February 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to $500.0 million of the Company's common stock. In September 2011, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to an additional $500.0 million of the Company's common stock. Stock repurchased under these programs has been used primarily to offset obligations under the Company's employee stock incentive programs and

35


Table of Contents

reduce the total shares outstanding. During 2011, the Company repurchased 3.8 million shares at an aggregate cost of $300.1 million and had remaining authority to purchase $597.9 million of the Company's common stock. In addition to shares repurchased under the stock repurchase program, the Company also acquired shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees.

        Net cash flows provided by operating activities of $314.5 million for 2011 increased $63.1 million from 2010 due primarily to higher operating profits and a $49.1 million positive impact from decreased excess tax benefits from stock plans due to credit carryforwards and net operating losses in the United States in 2011 resulting in excess tax benefits that were not realized. This increase was partially offset by higher working capital needs (primarily inventory and accounts receivables).

        Net cash flows provided by operating activities of $251.4 million for 2010 increased $86.1 million from 2009 due primarily to (1) a $39.0 million cash payment during 2009 to terminate the Company's accounts receivable securitization program in Japan, (2) lower supplier payments in 2010 compared to 2009 and (3) higher operating profits. These increases were partially offset by higher inventory purchases in 2010, primarily related to the transcatheter heart valve product line, and the negative impact from increased excess tax benefits from stock plans due to the appreciation in the Company's stock price and increased exercises (which is offset in financing activities).

        Net cash used in investing activities of $412.8 million in 2011 consisted primarily of net purchases of short-term investments of $293.4 million, a $42.6 million payment associated with the acquisition of Embrella, and capital expenditures of $82.9 million.

        Net cash used in investing activities of $61.5 million in 2010 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $61.8 million.

        Net cash used in financing activities of $135.2 million in 2011 consisted primarily of net purchases of treasury stock of $303.4 million, partially offset by net proceeds from debt of $104.4 million and proceeds from stock plans of $59.5 million.

        Net cash used in financing activities of $103.9 million in 2010 consisted primarily of purchases of treasury stock of $200.0 million and net payments on debt of $48.4 million, partially offset by the proceeds from stock plans of $92.1 million and the excess tax benefit from stock plans of $55.1 million, which increased compared to the prior year due to the appreciation in the Company's stock price and increased exercises.

        A summary of all of the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

 
  Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations
  Total   Less Than
1 Year
  1-3
Years
  4-5
Years
  After 5
Years
 

Debt

  $ 150.4   $   $   $ 150.4   $  

Interest on debt

    10.4     2.9     5.8     1.7      

Operating leases

    81.4     14.2     22.1     14.5     30.6  

Pension obligations(a)

    6.5     6.5              

Contractual development obligations(b)

    5.2     0.5     4.4     0.3      

Capital commitment obligations(c)

    2.3     0.6     1.7          
                       

Total contractual cash obligations(d)

  $ 256.2   $ 24.7   $ 34.0   $ 166.9   $ 30.6  
                       

(a)
The amount included in "Less Than 1 Year" reflects anticipated contributions to the Company's various pension plans. Anticipated contributions beyond one year are not determinable. The total accrued benefit liability for the Company's pension plans recognized as of December 31, 2011 was $41.8 million. This

36


Table of Contents

    amount is impacted by, among other items, pension expense funding levels, changes in plan demographics and assumptions, and investment return on plan assets. Therefore, the Company is unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period in which the liability might be paid, and did not include this amount in the contractual obligations table. See Note 11 to the " Consolidated Financial Statements " for further information.

(b)
Contractual development obligations consist primarily of cash that the Company is obligated to pay upon achievement of product development and other milestones.

(c)
Capital commitment obligations consist primarily of cash that the Company is obligated to pay to its limited partnership and limited liability corporation investees. These investees make equity investments in various development stage biopharmaceutical and medical device companies, and it is not certain if and/or when these payments will be made.

(d)
As of December 31, 2011, the liability for uncertain tax positions including interest was $81.2 million. As a result of on-going negotiations of an Advanced Pricing Agreement between Switzerland and the United States, the expiration of statutes of limitations, and the possible settlement of on-going audits in several jurisdictions for multiple years throughout the world, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next 12 months. The range of such change could vary, but the amount of such change is not expected to be material.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The Company's results of operations and financial position are determined based upon the application of the Company's accounting policies, as discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Certain of the Company's accounting policies represent a selection among acceptable alternatives under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States ("GAAP"). In evaluating the Company's transactions, management assesses all relevant GAAP and chooses the accounting policy that most accurately reflects the nature of the transactions.

        The application of accounting policies requires the use of judgment and estimates. As it relates to the Company, estimates and forecasts are required to determine sales returns and reserves, rebate reserves, allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, investments in unconsolidated affiliates, the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, the allocation of purchase price for acquisitions, workers' compensation liabilities, employee benefit related liabilities, income taxes, impairments of assets, forecasted transactions to be hedged, litigation reserves and contingencies.

        These matters that are subject to judgments and estimation are inherently uncertain, and different amounts could be reported using different assumptions and estimates. Management uses its best estimates and judgments in determining the appropriate amount to reflect in the consolidated financial statements, using historical experience and all available information. The Company also uses outside experts where appropriate. The Company applies estimation methodologies consistently from year to year.

        The Company believes the following are the critical accounting policies which could have the most significant effect on the Company's reported results and require subjective or complex judgments by management.

    Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is considered realized or realizable and earned upon delivery of the product, provided that an agreement of sale exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. In the case of certain products where the Company maintains consigned inventory at customer locations, revenue is recognized at the time the Company is notified that the customer has used the inventory.

37


Table of Contents

        The Company's sales terms are standard terms within the medical device industry, with title and risk of loss transferring upon delivery to the customer, limited right of return and no unusual provisions or conditions. When the Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its products, an estimate of various sales returns and allowances is recorded which reduces product sales and accounts receivable. These adjustments include estimates for rebates, returns and other sales allowances. These provisions are estimated and recorded at the time of sale based upon historical payment experience, historical relationship to revenues, estimated customer inventory levels, and current contract sales terms with direct and indirect customers. Product returns are not significant because returns are generally not allowed unless the product is damaged at time of receipt. If the historical data and inventory estimates used to calculate these provisions do not approximate future activity, the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be impacted.

        The Company's primary sales adjustment relates to distributor rebates which are given to the Company's United States distributors and represents the difference between the Company's sales price to the distributor (at the Company's distributor "list price") and the negotiated price to be paid by the end-customer. This distributor rebate is recorded by the Company as a reduction to sales and a reduction to the distributor's accounts receivable at the time of sale to a distributor. The Company validates the distributor rebate accrual quarterly through either a review of the inventory reports obtained from its distributors or an estimate of its distributor's inventory. This distributor inventory information is used to verify the estimated liability for future distributor rebate claims based on historical rebates and contract rates. The Company periodically monitors current pricing trends and distributor inventory levels to ensure the credit for future distributor rebates is fairly stated.

        The Company also offers volume rebates to certain GPOs and customers based upon target sales levels. For volume rebates offered to GPOs, the rebates are recorded as a reduction to sales and an obligation to the GPO. For volume rebates offered to customers, the rebates are recorded as a reduction to sales and accounts receivable. The provision for volume rebates is estimated based on customers' contracted rebate programs and historical experience of rebates paid. The Company periodically monitors its customer rebate programs to ensure that the allowance and liability for accrued rebates is fairly stated.

    Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts based on customer-specific analysis and general matters such as current assessments of past due balances and economic conditions. The credit and economic conditions within Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, among other members of the European Union, have deteriorated as these countries have experienced slower economic growth and higher debt levels. When evaluating its allowances for doubtful accounts related to these European receivables, the Company's analysis considers a number of factors including evidence of the customer's ability to comply with credit terms, economic conditions and procedures implemented by the Company to collect the historical receivables. Additional allowances for doubtful accounts may be required if there is deterioration in past due balances, if economic conditions are less favorable than the Company has anticipated, or for customer-specific circumstances, such as financial difficulty. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $19.0 million and $11.6 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

    Excess and Obsolete Inventory

        The Company records allowances for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and estimated future demand and market conditions. Additional inventory allowances may be required if future demand or market conditions are less favorable than the Company has estimated. A write-down for excess or inactive inventory is recorded for inventory which is obsolete, nearing its expiration date (generally triggered at six months prior to expiration), is damaged or slow moving (defined as quantities in excess of a two year supply). The allowance for excess and obsolete inventory was $12.9 million and $11.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

38


Table of Contents

    Patent Costs

        The Company expenses legal costs incurred for patent preparation and applications. The Company capitalizes certain legal costs related to the defense and enforcement of issued patents and trademarks. These capitalized legal costs are amortized over the life of the related patent or trademark. Such legal costs are periodically reviewed for impairment and recoverability.

    Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

        The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. In evaluating goodwill, the Company completes a two-step goodwill impairment test. The Company identifies its reporting units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including existing goodwill, to those reporting units. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated based on the Company's market capitalization and a market revenue multiple. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company will perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with its carrying value. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not perform the second step of the impairment test as the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its respective carrying value.

        Additionally, management reviews the carrying amounts of other intangible and long-lived tangible assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, historic or anticipated declines in revenue or operating profit, and adverse legal or regulatory developments. If it is determined that such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair market value. Estimated fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. For the purposes of identifying and measuring impairment, long-lived assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.

    Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are long-term equity investments in companies that are in various stages of development. Certain of these investments are designated as available-for-sale. These investments are carried at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in stockholders' equity as " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. " Gains or losses on investments sold are based on the specific identification method. Other investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for under the cost or the equity method of accounting, as appropriate. The Company accounts for investments in limited partnerships or limited liability corporations, whereby the Company owns a minimum of 5% of the investee's outstanding voting stock, under the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded at the amount of the Company's investment and adjusted each period for the Company's share of the investee's income or loss and dividends paid. As investments accounted for under the cost method do not have readily determinable fair value, the Company only estimates fair value if there are identified events or changes in circumstances that could have a significant adverse effect on the investment's fair value.

        When the fair value of an available-for-sale investment declines below cost, management uses the following criteria to determine if such a decline should be considered other-than-temporary and result in a recognized loss:

    the duration and extent to which the market value has been less than cost;

    the financial condition and near term prospects of the investee;

    the reasons for the decline in market value;

39


Table of Contents

    the investee's performance against product development milestones; and

    the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

    Income Taxes

        Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. The Company evaluates quarterly the realizability of its deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance and adjusting the amount, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are both historical experience and the Company's forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions could affect the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets and could result in an increase in the Company's effective tax rate on future earnings.

        The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company's uncertain tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes. The Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that a position would more likely than not be sustained based upon its technical merit if challenged by the relevant taxing authority and taken by management to the court of last resort. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the relevant tax authority.

        The Company strives to resolve open matters with each tax authority at the examination level and could reach agreement with a tax authority at any time. While the Company has accrued for matters it believes are more likely than not to require settlement, the final outcome with a tax authority may result in a tax liability that is more or less than that reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, the Company may later decide to challenge any assessments, if made, and may exercise its right to appeal. The uncertain tax positions are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as events occur that affect potential liabilities for additional taxes, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, proposed assessments by tax authorities, negotiations between tax authorities, identification of new issues and issuance of new legislation, regulations or case law. Management believes that adequate amounts of tax and related penalty and interest have been provided in income tax expense for any adjustments that may result from these uncertain tax positions.

        As a result of on-going negotiations of an Advanced Pricing Agreement, the expiration of statutes of limitations, and the possible settlement of on-going audits in several jurisdictions for multiple years throughout the world, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next 12 months. The range of such change could vary, but the amount of such change is not expected to be material.

        The Company has approximately $29.5 million of California research expenditure tax credits it expects to use in future periods. The credits may be carried forward indefinitely. Based upon anticipated future taxable income over an extended number of years, the Company expects all California research expenditure tax credits to be fully utilized; accordingly, no valuation allowance has been provided.

    Stock-based Compensation

        The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on estimated fair values. Stock-based awards consist of stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase subscriptions. The fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes model requires various highly judgmental assumptions, including stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, and expected option term. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures. Judgment is

40


Table of Contents

required in estimating the stock awards that will ultimately be forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and the Company's results of operations could be impacted.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

        In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on fair value measurements to ensure that United States GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards have common requirements for fair value measurement and disclosures, including a consistent definition of fair value. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The guidance eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, and instead requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders' equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on goodwill to permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The guidance requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        The Company's business and financial results are affected by fluctuations in world financial markets, including changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates. The Company manages these risks through a combination of normal operating and financing activities and derivative financial instruments. The Company uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option-based products to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency rates. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

        In addition to available cash and cash from operations, the Company uses short- and long-term debt to finance business activities. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its debt obligations. The Company manages this risk through normal financing and investing activities and is not currently using derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. A hypothetical 10% increase in the Company's weighted-average interest rate would have an immaterial effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

41


Table of Contents

        For more information related to outstanding debt obligations, see Note 8 to the " Consolidated Financial Statements. "

Currency Risk

        The Company is exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from normal business operations. These risks include the translation of local currency balances and results of the Company's non-United States subsidiaries into United States dollars, currency gains and losses related to intercompany and third-party transactions denominated in currencies other than a location's functional currency, and currency gains and losses associated with intercompany loans. The Company's principal currency exposures relate to the Japanese yen and the Euro. The Company's objective is to minimize the volatility of its exposure to these risks through a combination of normal operating and financing activities and the use of derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options contracts. The Company does not hedge its exposure related to its net investments in its non-United States subsidiaries. The total notional amounts of the Company's derivative financial instruments entered into for foreign currency management purposes at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $759.5 million and $539.2 million, respectively. A hypothetical 10% increase/decrease in the value of the United States dollar against all hedged currencies would increase/decrease the fair value of these derivative contracts by $50.4 million and $51.7 million, respectively. Any gains or losses on the fair value of derivative contracts would generally be offset by gains and losses on the underlying transactions and would not be significant to the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

        For more information related to outstanding foreign exchange contracts, see Notes 2 and 10 to the " Consolidated Financial Statements. "

Credit Risk

        Derivative financial instruments involve credit risk in the event the financial institution counterparty should default. It is the Company's policy to execute such instruments with major financial institutions that the Company believes to be creditworthy. At December 31, 2011, all derivative financial instruments were with bank counterparties assigned investment grade ratings of "A" or better by national rating agencies. The Company further diversifies its derivative financial instruments among counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. The Company has not experienced a counterparty default and does not anticipate any non-performance by the Company's current derivative counterparties.

Concentrations of Risk

        The Company invests excess cash in bank time deposits and diversifies the concentration of cash amongst different financial institutions.

        In the normal course of business, Edwards Lifesciences provides credit to customers in the healthcare industry, performs credit evaluations of these customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses which have historically been adequate compared to actual losses. In 2011, the Company had no customers that represent greater than 10% of its total net sales or accounts receivable, net.

        The Company continues to do business with foreign governments in certain European countries that have experienced a deterioration in credit and economic conditions. These conditions have resulted in, and may continue to result in, an increase in the average length of time that it takes to collect accounts receivable outstanding in these countries. In addition, the Company may also be impacted by declines in sovereign credit ratings or sovereign defaults in these countries.

        During 2011, the Company recorded a $12.8 million charge to reflect the increased risk associated with its Southern European receivables, primarily Greece. A significant further decline in sovereign credit ratings or a debt default in Greece, or in other European countries, may decrease the likelihood that the Company

42


Table of Contents

will collect these accounts receivable, which could result in a negative impact to the Company's operating results. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's accounts receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, from customers in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece were $113.7 million.

Investment Risk

        Edwards Lifesciences is exposed to investment risks related to changes in the fair values of its investments. The Company invests in equity instruments of public and private companies. These investments are classified in " Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates " on the consolidated balance sheets.

        As of December 31, 2011, Edwards Lifesciences had $21.8 million of investments in equity instruments of other companies and had recorded unrealized gains of $1.1 million on these investments in " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss ," net of tax. Should these companies experience a decline in financial condition or fail to meet certain development milestones, the decline in the investments' values may be considered other than temporary and impairment charges may be necessary.

43


Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011

44


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation:

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) because a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the effective controls not being in place with respect to communication to appropriate financial reporting personnel from other departments of changes to information impacting classification and disclosures in the financial statements existed as of that date. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness referred to above is described in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered this material weakness in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2011 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in management's report referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

45


Table of Contents

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Irvine, California
February 27, 2012

46


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except par value)

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  

ASSETS

 

Current assets

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 171.2   $ 396.1  

Short-term investments (Notes 2 and 20)

    279.3      

Accounts receivable, net (Note 4)

    283.8     277.3  

Other receivables

    36.9     25.2  

Inventories, net (Note 4)

    261.3     203.6  

Deferred income taxes

    43.9     32.3  

Prepaid expenses

    35.0     35.4  

Other current assets

    57.1     62.7  
           

Total current assets

    1,168.5     1,032.6  

Long-term accounts receivable, net (Note 4)

   
24.6
   
 

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 4)

    304.3     269.8  

Goodwill (Note 6)

    349.8     315.2  

Other intangible assets, net (Note 6)

    66.9     67.1  

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates (Note 7)

    21.8     25.0  

Deferred income taxes

    20.0     44.5  

Other assets

    24.6     13.0  
           

Total assets

  $ 1,980.5   $ 1,767.2  
           

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

Current liabilities

             

Accounts payable

  $ 85.0   $ 47.6  

Accrued liabilities (Note 4)

    234.8     226.1  

Taxes payable

    15.4     22.3  

Short-term debt (Note 8)

        41.8  
           

Total current liabilities

    335.2     337.8  
           

Long-term debt (Note 8)

    150.4      
           

Other long-term liabilities

    157.0     121.2  
           

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 8 and 16)

             

Stockholders' equity (Note 11)

             

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 50.0 shares, no shares outstanding

         

Common stock, $1.00 par value, 350.0 shares authorized, 120.0 and 117.0 shares issued, and 114.1 and 115.0 shares outstanding, respectively

    120.0     117.0  

Additional paid-in capital

    300.5     211.3  

Retained earnings

    1,360.7     1,124.0  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (37.5 )   (42.1 )

Treasury stock, at cost, 5.9 and 2.0 shares, respectively

    (405.8 )   (102.0 )
           

Total stockholders' equity

    1,337.9     1,308.2  
           

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

  $ 1,980.5   $ 1,767.2  
           

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

47


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per share information)

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Net sales

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4  

Cost of goods sold

    489.8     408.3     399.1  
               

Gross profit

    1,188.8     1,038.7     922.3  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    642.4     550.0     508.8  

Research and development expenses

    246.3     204.4     175.5  

Special charges (gains), net (Note 3)

    21.6     22.7     (63.8 )

Interest expense

    3.1     2.4     2.7  

Interest income

    (3.4 )   (0.9 )   (1.6 )

Other income, net (Note 14)

    (4.8 )   (8.1 )   (3.7 )
               

Income before provision for income taxes

    283.6     268.2     304.4  

Provision for income taxes (Note 15)

    46.9     50.2     75.3  
               

Net income

  $ 236.7   $ 218.0   $ 229.1  
               

Share information (Note 2):

                   

Earnings per share:

                   

Basic

  $ 2.07   $ 1.92   $ 2.04  

Diluted

  $ 1.98   $ 1.83   $ 1.95  

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:

                   

Basic

    114.6     113.7     112.5  

Diluted

    119.4     119.2     117.5  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

48


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Cash flows from operating activities

                   

Net income

  $ 236.7   $ 218.0   $ 229.1  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

                   

Depreciation and amortization

    58.0     56.5     58.7  

Stock-based compensation (Notes 2 and 12)

    35.0     29.3     28.3  

Excess tax benefit from stock plans (Notes 2 and 12)

    (6.0 )   (55.1 )   (20.6 )

Deferred income taxes

    (0.6 )   (11.2 )   (10.0 )

Special charges (gains), net (Note 3)

    21.2     22.7     (75.5 )

Loss (gain) on trading securities

    1.0     (2.7 )   (3.3 )

Other

    (1.1 )   (5.0 )   0.3  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                   

Accounts and other receivables, net

    (53.7 )   (34.2 )   (58.9 )

Accounts receivable securitization

            7.3  

Inventories, net

    (57.0 )   (36.8 )   (13.1 )

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    61.7     63.6     2.7  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

    20.6     (2.5 )   7.6  

Other

    (1.3 )   8.8     12.7  
               

Net cash provided by operating activities

    314.5     251.4     165.3  
               

Cash flows from investing activities

                   

Capital expenditures

    (82.9 )   (61.8 )   (64.0 )

Purchases of short-term investments (Note 2 and 20)

    (643.3 )        

Proceeds from short-term investments (Note 2 and 20)

    349.9         11.4  

Acquisition (Note 5)

    (42.6 )        

Proceeds from sale of assets (Note 3)

    3.9     6.6     97.9  

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

    (2.3 )   (6.9 )   (5.8 )

Proceeds from unconsolidated affiliates

    9.1     2.2     2.3  

Investments in intangible assets

    (7.7 )   (1.2 )    

Proceeds from (investments in) trading securities, net

    3.1     (0.4 )   (1.7 )
               

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

    (412.8 )   (61.5 )   40.1  
               

Cash flows from financing activities

                   

Payments on debt

    (421.7 )   (302.8 )   (213.9 )

Proceeds from issuance of debt

    526.1     254.4     129.3  

Purchases of treasury stock

    (303.4 )   (200.0 )   (95.5 )

Proceeds from stock plans

    59.5     92.1     66.7  

Excess tax benefit from stock plans (Notes 2 and 12)

    6.0     55.1     20.6  

Other

    (1.7 )   (2.7 )   1.0  
               

Net cash used in financing activities

    (135.2 )   (103.9 )   (91.8 )
               

Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

    8.6     (24.0 )   1.8  
               

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

    (224.9 )   62.0     115.4  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

    396.1     334.1     218.7  
               

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $ 171.2   $ 396.1   $ 334.1  
               

Supplemental disclosures:

                   

Cash paid during the year for:

                   

Interest

  $ 3.2   $ 2.4   $ 2.7  

Income taxes

  $ 15.4   $ 14.7   $ 34.2  

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

                   

Distribution of treasury shares to effect stock split

  $   $ 970.3   $  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

49


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in millions)

 
  Common Stock   Treasury Stock    
   
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   
   
 
 
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Total
Stockholders'
Equity
  Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
 
  Shares   Par Value   Shares   Amount  

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008

    73.7     73.7     17.8     (776.8 )   940.4     676.9     (35.4 )   878.8        

Comprehensive income

                                                       

Net income

                                  229.1           229.1   $ 229.1  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

                                                       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

                                        17.3     17.3     17.3  

Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

                                        (3.5 )   (3.5 )   (3.5 )

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments

                                        4.1     4.1     4.1  

Reclassification of net realized investment loss to earnings

                                        0.6     0.6     0.6  

Defined benefit pension plans—net actuarial gain

                                        9.0     9.0     9.0  

Common stock issued under equity plans, including tax benefits and other

    2.4     2.4                 87.1                 89.5        

Tax benefit due to redemption of convertible debt

                            0.2                 0.2        

Stock-based compensation expense

                            28.3                 28.3        

Purchase of treasury stock

                1.5     (95.5 )                     (95.5 )      
                                       

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009

    76.1     76.1     19.3     (872.3 )   1,056.0     906.0     (7.9 )   1,157.9   $ 256.6  
                                                       

Comprehensive income

                                                       

Net income

                                  218.0           218.0   $ 218.0  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

                                                       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

                                        (24.9 )   (24.9 )   (24.9 )

Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

                                        (6.8 )   (6.8 )   (6.8 )

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments

                                        (0.8 )   (0.8 )   (0.8 )

Reclassification of net realized investment loss to earnings

                                        4.0     4.0     4.0  

Defined benefit pension plans—net actuarial loss

                                        (5.7 )   (5.7 )   (5.7 )

Common stock issued under equity plans, including tax benefits and other

    4.3     4.3                 132.9                 137.2        

Stock-based compensation expense

                            29.3                 29.3        

Purchase of treasury stock

                3.1     (200.0 )                     (200.0 )      

Stock issued to effect stock split

    36.6     36.6     (20.4 )   970.3     (1,006.9 )                      
                                       

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010

    117.0     117.0     2.0     (102.0 )   211.3     1,124.0     (42.1 )   1,308.2   $ 183.8  
                                                       

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

50


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Continued)

(in millions)

 
  Common Stock   Treasury Stock    
   
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   
   
 
 
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Total
Stockholders'
Equity
  Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
 
  Shares   Par Value   Shares   Amount  

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010

    117.0   $ 117.0     2.0   $ (102.0 ) $ 211.3   $ 1,124.0   $ (42.1 ) $ 1,308.2        

Comprehensive income

                                                       

Net income

                                  236.7           236.7   $ 236.7  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

                                                       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

                                        (5.2 )   (5.2 )   (5.2 )

Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges

                                        16.8     16.8     16.8  

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments

                                        (0.1 )   (0.1 )   (0.1 )

Reclassification of net realized investment gain to earnings

                                        (1.0 )   (1.0 )   (1.0 )

Defined benefit pension plans—net actuarial loss and other (Note 13)

                                        (5.9 )   (5.9 )   (5.9 )

Common stock issued under equity plans, including tax benefits and other

    3.0     3.0                 54.2                 57.2        

Stock-based compensation expense

                            35.0                 35.0        

Purchase of treasury stock

                3.9     (303.8 )                     (303.8 )      
                                       

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

    120.0   $ 120.0     5.9   $ (405.8 ) $ 300.5   $ 1,360.7   $ (37.5 ) $ 1,337.9   $ 241.3  
                                       

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

51


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.    DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

        Edwards Lifesciences Corporation ("Edwards Lifesciences" or the "Company") conducts operations worldwide and is managed in the following geographical regions: United States, Europe, Japan and Rest of World. Edwards Lifesciences is a global leader in the science of heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring. The Company develops innovative technologies in the areas of structural heart disease and critical care monitoring.

        The products and technologies provided by Edwards Lifesciences to treat advanced cardiovascular disease or critically ill patients are categorized into the following main areas: Heart Valve Therapy; Critical Care; Cardiac Surgery Systems; and Vascular. The Company's Heart Valve Therapy products include tissue heart valves and heart valve repair products. The Critical Care products include hemodynamic monitoring systems used to measure a patient's cardiovascular function, and disposable pressure transducers. Prior to September 2009, Edwards Lifesciences provided products for continuous renal replacement therapy ("hemofiltration product line"). The Company sold the hemofiltration product line in September 2009. The Company's Cardiac Surgery Systems products include a diverse line of products for use during cardiac surgery, including cannulae, embolic protection devices and other products used during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Cardiac Surgery Systems also includes the Company's minimally invasive surgery product line. The Vascular products include a line of balloon catheter-based products, surgical clips and inserts, and, until the first quarter of 2011, artificial implantable grafts. Edwards Lifesciences manufactured and sold LifeStent balloon-expandable and self-expanding non-coronary stents until the sale of this product line in January 2008. The Company continued to manufacture these products for the buyer until September 2009 when manufacturing was transferred to the buyer.

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Edwards Lifesciences and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

        The consolidated financial statements of Edwards Lifesciences have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") which have been applied consistently in all material respects. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, sales returns and reserves, rebate reserves, allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, investments in unconsolidated affiliates, the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, the allocation of purchase price for acquisitions, workers compensation liabilities, employee benefit-related liabilities, income taxes, asset impairments, forecasted transactions to be hedged, litigation reserves and contingencies.

Foreign Currency Translation

        When the local currency of the Company's foreign entities is the functional currency, all assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the weighted-average exchange rate prevailing during the period.

52


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments for these entities are deferred and reported in stockholders' equity as " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss ." The effects of foreign currency transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity's functional currency are included in " Other Income, net. "

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is considered realized or realizable and earned upon delivery of the product, provided that an agreement of sale exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. In the case of certain products where the Company maintains consigned inventory at customer locations, revenue is recognized at the time the Company is notified that the customer has used the inventory.

        The Company's sales terms are standard terms within the medical device industry, with title and risk of loss transferring upon delivery to the customer, limited right of return and no unusual provisions or conditions. When the Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its products, an estimate of various sales returns and allowances is recorded which reduces product sales and accounts receivable. These adjustments include estimates for rebates, returns and other sales allowances. These provisions are estimated and recorded at the time of sale based upon historical payment experience, historical relationship to revenues, estimated customer inventory levels, and current contract sales terms with direct and indirect customers. Product returns are not significant because returns are generally not allowed unless the product is damaged at time of receipt. If the historical data and inventory estimates used to calculate these provisions do not approximate future activity, the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be impacted.

        The Company's primary sales adjustment relates to distributor rebates which are given to the Company's United States distributors and represents the difference between the Company's sales price to the distributor (at the Company's distributor "list price") and the negotiated price to be paid by the end-customer. This distributor rebate is recorded by the Company as a reduction to sales and a reduction to the distributor's accounts receivable at the time of sale to a distributor. The Company validates the distributor rebate accrual quarterly through either a review of the inventory reports obtained from its distributors or an estimate of its distributor's inventory. This distributor inventory information is used to verify the estimated liability for future distributor rebate claims based on historical rebates and contract rates. The Company periodically monitors current pricing trends and distributor inventory levels to ensure the credit for future distributor rebates is fairly stated.

        The Company also offers volume rebates to certain group purchasing organizations ("GPOs") and customers based upon target sales levels. For volume rebates offered to GPOs, the rebates are recorded as a reduction to sales and an obligation to the GPO. For volume rebates offered to customers, the rebates are recorded as a reduction to sales and accounts receivable. The provision for volume rebates is estimated based on customers' contracted rebate programs and historical experience of rebates paid. The Company periodically monitors its customer rebate programs to ensure that the allowance and liability for accrued rebates is fairly stated.

Shipping and Handling Costs

        Shipping costs, which are costs incurred to physically move product from the Company's premises to the customer's premises, are included in " Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ." Handling costs, which are costs incurred to store, move and prepare products for shipment, are included in " Cost of Goods Sold ." For the

53


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, shipping costs of $51.0 million, $43.6 million and $41.4 million, respectively, were included in " Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ."

Cash Equivalents

        The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. These investments are valued at cost, which approximates fair value.

Short-term Investments

        The Company invests in bank time deposits. Bank time deposits with original maturities of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents, and bank time deposits with original maturities over three months are classified as short-term investments. Investments in bank time deposits are classified as held-to-maturity, as management has both the intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity, and are reported at cost, which approximates fair value. Income relating to these bank time deposits is reported as interest income.

        The Company held an investment in the Bank of America Columbia Strategic Cash fund, a private placement money market mutual fund, which was closed to new subscriptions or redemptions in December 2007, resulting in the Company's inability to immediately redeem its investments for cash. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company received cash redemptions fully redeeming its remaining investment in this fund. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized realized gains of $0.5 million, included in " Other Income, net. "

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts based on customer-specific analysis and general matters such as current assessments of past due balances and economic conditions. The credit and economic conditions within Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, among other members of the European Union, have deteriorated as these countries have experienced slower economic growth and higher debt levels. When evaluating its allowances for doubtful accounts related to these European receivables, the Company's analysis considers a number of factors including evidence of the customer's ability to comply with credit terms, economic conditions and procedures implemented by the Company to collect the historical receivables. Additional allowances for doubtful accounts may be required if there is deterioration in past due balances, if economic conditions are less favorable than the Company has anticipated, or for customer-specific circumstances, such as financial difficulty. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $19.0 million and $11.6 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. Market value for raw materials is based on replacement costs, and for other inventory classifications is based on net realizable value.

        A write-down for excess or inactive inventory is recorded for inventory which is obsolete, nearing its expiration date (generally triggered at six months prior to expiration), is damaged or slow moving (defined as quantities in excess of a two year supply). The allowance for excess and obsolete inventory was $12.9 million and $11.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

54


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        The Company allocates to inventory general and administrative costs that are related to the production process. These costs include insurance, manufacturing accounting personnel, human resources and information technology. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company allocated $25.3 million, $23.4 million and $20.9 million, respectively, of general and administrative costs to inventory. General and administrative costs included in inventory at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $15.9 million and $12.0 million, respectively.

Property, Plant and Equipment

        Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is principally calculated for financial reporting purposes on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements, from 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment, and from 3 to 10 years for software. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the related facility leases or the asset, whichever is shorter. Straight-line and accelerated methods of depreciation are used for income tax purposes.

        Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $44.0 million, $40.0 million and $38.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Repairs and maintenance expense was $18.1 million, $16.1 million and $15.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

        The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. In evaluating goodwill, the Company completes a two-step goodwill impairment test. The Company identifies its reporting units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including existing goodwill, to those reporting units. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated based on the Company's market capitalization and a market revenue multiple. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company will perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with its carrying value. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not perform the second step of the impairment test as the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its respective carrying value.

        Additionally, management reviews the carrying amounts of other intangible and long-lived tangible assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, historic or anticipated declines in revenue or operating profit, and adverse legal or regulatory developments. If it is determined that such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair market value. Estimated fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. For the purposes of identifying and measuring impairment, long-lived assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.

55


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Patent Costs

        The Company expenses legal costs incurred for patent preparation and applications. The Company capitalizes certain legal costs related to the defense and enforcement of issued patents and trademarks. These capitalized legal costs are amortized over the life of the related patent or trademark. Such legal costs are periodically reviewed for impairment and recoverability.

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are long-term equity investments in companies that are in various stages of development. Certain of these investments are designated as available-for-sale. These investments are carried at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in stockholders' equity as " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss ." Gains or losses on investments sold are based on the specific identification method. Other investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for under the cost or the equity method of accounting, as appropriate. The Company accounts for investments in limited partnerships or limited liability corporations, whereby the Company owns a minimum of 5% of the investee's outstanding voting stock, under the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded at the amount of the Company's investment and adjusted each period for the Company's share of the investee's income or loss and dividends paid. As investments accounted for under the cost method do not have readily determinable fair value, the Company only estimates fair value if there are identified events or changes in circumstances that could have a significant adverse effect on the investment's fair value.

        When the fair value of an available-for-sale investment declines below cost, management uses the following criteria to determine if such a decline should be considered other-than-temporary and result in a recognized loss:

    the duration and extent to which the market value has been less than cost;

    the financial condition and near term prospects of the investee;

    the reasons for the decline in market value;

    the investee's performance against product development milestones; and

    the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Income Taxes

        Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. The Company evaluates quarterly the realizability of its deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance and adjusting the amount, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are both historical experience and the Company's forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions could affect the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets and could result in an increase in the Company's effective tax rate on future earnings.

        The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company's uncertain tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes. The Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only

56


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

after determining that a position would more likely than not be sustained based upon its technical merit if challenged by the relevant taxing authority and taken by management to the court of last resort. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Research and Development Costs

        Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred.

Earnings per Share

        Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during a period. Employee equity share options, nonvested shares and similar equity instruments granted by the Company are treated as potential common shares in computing diluted earnings per share. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of restricted stock units and in-the-money options. The dilutive impact of the restricted stock units and in-the-money options is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount that the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation expense for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in " Additional Paid-In Capital " when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares. Potential common share equivalents have been excluded where their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

        The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except for per share information):

 
  Years ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Basic:

                   

Net income

  $ 236.7   $ 218.0   $ 229.1  
               

Weighted-average shares outstanding

    114.6     113.7     112.5  
               

Basic earnings per share

  $ 2.07   $ 1.92   $ 2.04  
               

Diluted:

                   

Net income

  $ 236.7   $ 218.0   $ 229.1  
               

Weighted-average shares outstanding

    114.6     113.7     112.5  

Dilutive effect of stock plans

    4.8     5.5     5.0  
               

Dilutive weighted-average shares outstanding

    119.4     119.2     117.5  
               

Diluted earnings per share

  $ 1.98   $ 1.83   $ 1.95  
               

        Stock options and restricted stock units to purchase approximately 1.0 million, 0.9 million and 1.9 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

57


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Stock-based Compensation

        The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on estimated fair values. Stock-based awards consist of stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase subscriptions. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period (vesting period). Upon exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock units, the Company issues common stock.

        The Company attributes the value of restricted stock unit awards using the straight-line attribution method. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

        Total stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was as follows (in millions):

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Cost of goods sold

  $ 4.0   $ 2.7   $ 2.4  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    25.4     22.0     21.4  

Research and development expenses

    5.6     4.6     4.5  
               

Total stock-based compensation expense

  $ 35.0   $ 29.3   $ 28.3  
               

        Upon retirement, all unvested stock options are immediately forfeited. In addition, upon retirement, a participant will immediately vest in 25% of restricted stock units for each full year of employment with the Company measured from the grant date. All remaining unvested restricted stock units are immediately forfeited.

Derivatives

        The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency risks. The Company uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency option contracts to offset the changes due to currency rate movements in the amount of future cash flows associated with intercompany transactions expected to occur within the next thirteen months. These foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency option contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. Certain of the Company's locations have assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies resulting from intercompany and third-party transactions. The Company uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments to offset the transaction gains and losses associated with certain of these assets and liabilities. All foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency option contracts are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries, principally the Euro and the Japanese yen. It is the Company's policy not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

        All derivative financial instruments are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company reports in " Other Comprehensive Income " ("OCI") the effective portion of the gain or loss on derivative financial instruments that are designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges. The Company reclassifies these gains and losses into earnings in the same period in which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. Any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the changes in fair value of the derivative exceed the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction) is recorded in

58


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

current period earnings. All cash flow hedges during 2011, 2010 and 2009 were highly effective. The gains and losses on derivative financial instruments for which the Company does not elect hedge accounting treatment are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in each period based upon the change in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument. Cash flows from derivative financial instruments are reported as operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

        Derivative financial instruments involve credit risk in the event the counterparty should default. It is the Company's policy to execute such instruments with global financial institutions that the Company believes to be creditworthy. The Company diversifies its derivative financial instruments among counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. The Company also uses International Swap Dealers Association master-netting agreements. The master-netting agreements reduce the Company's counterparty settlement risk to the net amount of any receipts or payments due between the Company and the counterparty financial institution.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

        In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on revenue recognition to require companies to allocate revenue in arrangements involving multiple deliverables based on estimated selling price in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price for the deliverables. The guidance was also amended to eliminate the requirement that all undelivered elements must have objective and reliable evidence of fair value before a company can recognize the portion of the overall arrangement fee that is attributable to items that have already been delivered. The guidance was effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on revenue recognition to provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. Consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive. The guidance was effective for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on business combinations to clarify the acquisition date that should be used for reporting pro forma financial information disclosures when comparative financial statements are presented. An entity is required to disclose pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The guidance also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The guidance was effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

59


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

        In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on fair value measurements to ensure that United States GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards have common requirements for fair value measurement and disclosures, including a consistent definition of fair value. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The guidance eliminates the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, and instead requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders' equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on goodwill to permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The guidance requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3.    SPECIAL CHARGES (GAINS), NET

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  
 
  (in millions)
 

European receivables

  $ 12.8   $   $  

Realignment expenses

    5.5     7.2      

Settlements and litigation

    3.3         3.8  

MONARC program discontinuation

        8.3      

Investment impairment

        7.2     1.6  

Gain on sale of assets, net

            (86.9 )

Charitable fund contribution

            15.0  

Adjustment to capitalized patent enforcement costs

            3.7  

Reserve reversal

            (1.0 )
               

Total special charges (gains), net

  $ 21.6   $ 22.7   $ (63.8 )
               

60


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3.    SPECIAL CHARGES (GAINS), NET (Continued)

    European Receivables

        During 2011, the Company recorded a $12.8 million charge to reflect the increased risk associated with its southern European receivables, primarily Greece.

    Realignment Expenses

        In December 2011, the Company recorded a $5.5 million charge related primarily to severance expenses associated with a global workforce realignment impacting 49 employees. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's remaining severance obligations of $5.2 million are expected to be substantially paid by March 2013.

        In December 2010, the Company recorded a $7.2 million charge related primarily to severance expenses associated with a global workforce realignment impacting 84 employees. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's remaining severance obligations of $1.2 million are expected to be substantially paid by June 2012.

    Settlements and Litigation

        In December 2011, the Company recorded a $3.3 million charge related to a litigation settlement.

        In September 2009, the Company recorded a $3.8 million charge for litigation related to a royalty dispute in connection with a product in the Company's Cardiac Surgery Systems product line.

    MONARC Program Discontinuation

        During the second quarter of 2010, the Company decided to discontinue its MONARC transcatheter mitral valve program due to slow enrollment in the EVOLUTION II trial. As a result, the Company recorded an $8.3 million charge consisting of a $7.6 million impairment of intangible assets associated with the program and $0.7 million of clinical trial costs that will continue to be incurred under a contractual obligation that existed prior to the discontinuation date.

    Investment Impairment

        During 2010, the Company recorded a $7.2 million charge related to the other-than-temporary impairment of certain of its investments in unconsolidated affiliates. The Company concluded that the impairment of these investments was other-than-temporary based upon the continuing duration and severity of the impairment.

        In September 2009, the Company recorded a $1.6 million charge related to the other-than-temporary impairment of its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate. The Company concluded that the impairment of its investment was other-than-temporary based upon (a) the continuing duration and severity of the impairment and (b) positive clinical trial developments in the third quarter of 2009 which failed to raise the quoted market price of the affiliate's stock to the Company's carrying value.

    Gain on Sale of Assets, net

        In September 2009, the Company sold its hemofiltration product line. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received a cash payment of $55.9 million, and was entitled to earn-out payments up to $9.0 million based on certain revenue objectives to be achieved by the buyer over the two years following the sale. As of March 31, 2011, all earn-out payments had been earned. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of

61


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3.    SPECIAL CHARGES (GAINS), NET (Continued)

$43.6 million consisting of the cash proceeds of $55.9 million, offset by $8.5 million related to the net book value of inventory, fixed assets and intangible assets that were sold, satisfaction of a $0.6 million receivable, a $0.5 million write-off of goodwill associated with this product line and $2.7 million of transaction and other costs related to the sale. In connection with this transaction, the Company also recorded a $1.5 million charge in June 2009 for transaction costs and employee severance.

        In March 2009, the Company recorded a $2.8 million gain related to the sale of its distribution rights in Europe for a specialty vascular graft.

        In January 2008, the Company sold certain assets related to the Edwards LifeStent peripheral vascular product line. During 2009, under the terms of the sale agreement, the Company received $42.0 million in milestone payments.

    Charitable Fund Contribution

        In September 2009, the Company contributed $15.0 million to The Edwards Lifesciences Fund, a donor-advised fund intended to provide philanthropic support to cardiovascular and community related charitable causes. The contribution was an irrevocable contribution to a third party, and was recorded as an expense at the time of payment.

    Adjustment to Capitalized Patent Enforcement Costs

        In December 2009, the Company recorded a $3.7 million charge for the write-off of capitalized patent enforcement costs related to litigation in Europe for which success was no longer deemed probable.

    Reserve Reversal

        During 2004, the Company discontinued its Lifepath AAA endovascular graft program. In March 2009, upon completion of its remaining clinical obligations related to this program, the Company reversed its remaining $1.0 million clinical reserve.

62


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4.    COMPOSITION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL STATEMENT CAPTIONS

        Components of selected captions in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31 are as follows:

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  
 
  (in millions)
 

Accounts receivable, net(a)

             

Trade accounts receivable

  $ 298.6   $ 288.9  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

    (14.8 )   (11.6 )
           

  $ 283.8   $ 277.3  
           

Inventories, net

             

Raw materials

  $ 51.7   $ 38.2  

Work in process

    66.6     39.0  

Finished products

    143.0     126.4  
           

  $ 261.3   $ 203.6  
           

Property, plant and equipment, net

             

Land

  $ 21.6   $ 21.6  

Buildings and leasehold improvements

    172.8     147.4  

Machinery and equipment

    248.8     224.8  

Equipment with customers

    37.9     39.2  

Software

    94.0     81.2  

Construction in progress

    29.0     28.2  
           

    604.1     542.4  

Accumulated depreciation

    (299.8 )   (272.6 )
           

  $ 304.3   $ 269.8  
           

Long-term accounts receivable, net(a)

             

Long-term trade accounts receivable

  $ 28.8   $  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

    (4.2 )    
           

  $ 24.6   $  
           

Accrued liabilities

             

Employee compensation and withholdings

  $ 106.6   $ 98.9  

Property, payroll and other taxes

    22.1     21.5  

Accrued rebates

    13.4     10.0  

Clinical trial accruals

    12.7     14.0  

Deferred income taxes

    8.6      

Litigation reserves (Note 16)

    6.6     5.8  

Fair value of derivatives

        14.7  

Other accrued liabilities

    64.8     61.2  
           

  $ 234.8   $ 226.1  
           

(a)
The credit and economic conditions within certain European countries have deteriorated. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's accounts receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, from customers in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece were $113.7 million. Balances from customers located in these countries that are expected to be collected beyond one year have been discounted to present value based on the estimated collection date and have been classified as " Long-term Accounts Receivable, net " on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

63


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5.    ACQUISITION

        On March 11, 2011, the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Embrella Cardiovascular, Inc. ("Embrella"), including shares already owned by the Company, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $42.6 million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company placed $4.5 million of the purchase price into escrow to satisfy any claims for indemnification made in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. Any remaining funds will be disbursed to Embrella's former shareholders one year after the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs of $0.9 million were recorded in " Other Income, net. "

        Embrella was a start-up medical device company developing a device for cerebral embolic protection during cardiovascular procedures. The acquisition provides the Company with full rights to develop and commercialize Embrella's embolic deflector system, designed to be used as a protective shield during transcatheter heart valve procedures. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. Tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired (in millions):

Goodwill

  $ 34.6  

In-process research and development ("IPR&D")

    6.3  

Unpatented technology

    5.8  

Deferred income taxes

    (4.1 )
       

  $ 42.6  
       

        Goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the Company believes will result from the acquisition. Goodwill was assigned to the Europe segment and is partially deductible for tax purposes. IPR&D has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods. The fair value of the IPR&D was determined using the income approach. This approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return. Upon completion of development, the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life. Developed technology assets are being amortized over a weighted-average useful life of 8 years.

        Prior to the acquisition date, the Company owned approximately 9% of the fully-diluted outstanding shares of Embrella. As a result of the acquisition, the Company remeasured at fair value its previously held ownership in Embrella, which had a carrying value of $1.3 million at the date of acquisition, and, accordingly, recognized a gain of $3.1 million. The gain was recorded in " Other Income, net " during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and the cash received was recorded in " Proceeds from Unconsolidated Affiliates " on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The fair value of the Company's previous ownership interest in Embrella was determined using a market approach considering the amounts paid to acquire the remaining outstanding shares of Embrella.

        The results of operations for Embrella have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results have not been presented as the results of Embrella are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

6.    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        Goodwill recorded on the Company's balance sheet is largely the result of acquisitions completed prior to the spin-off of the Company from Baxter International, Inc. during 2000. Goodwill and IPR&D resulting

64


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6.    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

from purchase business combinations are not subject to amortization. Other acquired intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives.

        The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

 
  United
States
  Europe   Total  
 
  (in millions)
 

Goodwill at December 31, 2009

  $ 304.2   $ 11.0   $ 315.2  

Accumulated impairment losses

             
               

Goodwill at December 31, 2010

    304.2     11.0     315.2  

Goodwill acquired during the year

    4.1     30.5     34.6  

Accumulated impairment losses

             
               

Goodwill at December 31, 2011

  $ 308.3   $ 41.5   $ 349.8  
               

        Other intangible assets consist of the following (in millions):

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  
 
  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Carrying
Value
  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Carrying
Value
 

Amortizable intangible assets

                                     

Patents

  $ 205.9   $ (158.4 ) $ 47.5   $ 203.0   $ (147.8 ) $ 55.2  

Unpatented technology

    39.3     (31.3 )   8.0     35.0     (29.6 )   5.4  

Other

    12.0     (6.9 )   5.1     12.4     (5.9 )   6.5  
                           

    257.2     (196.6 )   60.6     250.4     (183.3 )   67.1  

Unamortizable intangible assets

                                     

IPR&D

    6.3         6.3              
                           

  $ 263.5   $ (196.6 ) $ 66.9   $ 250.4   $ (183.3 ) $ 67.1  
                           

        In March 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of Embrella (see Note 5). This transaction resulted in a net increase to goodwill of $34.6 million, unpatented technology of $5.8 million and IPR&D of $6.3 million.

        The net carrying value of patents includes $16.1 million and $16.0 million of capitalized legal costs related to the defense and enforcement of issued patents and trademarks for which success is deemed probable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively (see Note 2).

65


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6.    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        Amortization expense related to other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $14.1 million, $16.6 million and $20.6 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the years ending December 31 is as follows (in millions):

2012

  $ 13.1  

2013

    13.0  

2014

    11.3  

2015

    10.1  

2016

    10.0  

        The Company expenses costs incurred to renew or extend the term of acquired intangible assets.

7.    INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

        The Company has a number of equity investments in privately and publicly held companies. Investments in these unconsolidated affiliates are as follows:

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  
 
  (in millions)
 

Available-for-sale investments

             

Cost

  $ 2.0   $ 4.1  

Unrealized gains

    1.3     3.6  
           

Fair value of available-for-sale investments

    3.3     7.7  
           

Equity method investments

             

Cost

    12.6     11.5  

Equity in losses

    (0.7 )   (1.5 )
           

Carrying value of equity method investments

    11.9     10.0  
           

Cost method investments

             

Carrying value of cost method investments

    6.6     7.3  
           

Total investments in unconsolidated affiliates

  $ 21.8   $ 25.0  
           

        Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $3.6 million, $0.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and the Company realized pre-tax gains of $1.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. During 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $4.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to certain available-for-sale investments. During 2010, the Company also recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $3.0 million related to one of its cost method investments. See Note 3 for additional information.

8.    DEBT, CREDIT FACILITIES AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS

        In July 2011, Edwards Lifesciences entered into a Four-Year Credit Agreement ("the Credit Facility") which matures on July 29, 2015. The proceeds of the Credit Facility were used to refinance the Company's previous Five-Year Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement. The Credit Facility provides up to an aggregate of $500.0 million in borrowings in multiple currencies. Borrowings generally bear interest at the London

66


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8.    DEBT, CREDIT FACILITIES AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

interbank offering rate ("LIBOR") plus 0.875%, subject to adjustment for leverage ratio changes as defined in the Credit Facility. The Company also pays a facility fee of 0.125% on the entire $500.0 million facility whether or not drawn. The facility fee is also subject to adjustment for leverage ratio changes. All amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility have been classified as long-term obligations as these borrowings are expected to be refinanced pursuant to the Credit Facility. Issuance costs of $1.8 million are being amortized to interest expense over 4 years. As of December 31, 2011, borrowings of $150.4 million were outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is unsecured and contains various financial and other covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2011, the Company was in violation of certain covenants as a result of the Company's restatement of its 2011 interim consolidated condensed financial statements (see Note 20). Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Company obtained a waiver for this noncompliance from the lenders.

        Included in long-term debt at December 31, 2011 were unsecured notes under the Credit Facility denominated in Japanese yen of ¥1.2 billion (US$15.4 million). Included in short-term debt at December 31, 2010 were unsecured notes denominated in Japanese yen of ¥1.3 billion (US$15.5 million) and in Euro of €20.0 million (US$26.3 million).

        The weighted-average interest rate under all debt obligations was 1.8% and 2.7% at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        Certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates. Most of the operating leases contain renewal options. Total expense for all operating leases was $21.5 million, $19.6 million and $18.2 million for the years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Future minimum lease payments (including interest) under non-cancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at December 31, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

 
  Operating
Leases
  Aggregate
Debt
Maturities
 

2012

  $ 14.2   $  

2013

    13.0      

2014

    9.1      

2015

    7.6     150.4  

2016

    6.9      

Thereafter

    30.6      
           

Total obligations and commitments

  $ 81.4   $ 150.4  
           

9.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        The consolidated financial statements include financial instruments for which the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical cost basis. Financial instruments of the Company consist of cash deposits, bank time deposits, accounts and other receivables, investments in unconsolidated affiliates, accounts payable, certain accrued liabilities and borrowings under a revolving credit agreement. The carrying value of these financial instruments generally approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.

67


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company prioritizes the inputs used to determine fair values in one of the following three categories:

        Level 1—Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

        Level 2—Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable, either directly or indirectly.

        Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

        In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

    Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

        The following table summarizes the Company's financial instruments which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):

December 31, 2011
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total  

Assets

                         

Investments held for executive deferred compensation plan

  $ 11.5   $   $   $ 11.5  

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

    3.3             3.3  

Derivatives

        12.7         12.7  
                   

  $ 14.8   $ 12.7   $   $ 27.5  
                   

Liabilities

                         

Executive deferred compensation plan

  $ 9.9   $   $   $ 9.9  
                   

  $ 9.9   $   $   $ 9.9  
                   

 

December 31, 2010
   
   
   
   
 

Assets

                         

Investments held for executive deferred compensation plan

  $ 18.3   $   $   $ 18.3  

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

    7.7             7.7  
                   

  $ 26.0   $   $   $ 26.0  
                   

Liabilities

                         

Derivatives

  $   $ 14.7   $   $ 14.7  

Executive deferred compensation plan

    13.1             13.1  
                   

  $ 13.1   $ 14.7   $   $ 27.8  
                   

    Executive Deferred Compensation Plan

        The Company holds investments in trading securities related to its executive deferred compensation plan ("EDCP"). The amounts deferred under the EDCP are invested in a variety of stock and bond mutual funds.

68


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

The fair values of these investments and the corresponding liabilities are based on quoted market prices and are categorized as Level 1.

    Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are long-term equity investments in companies that are in various stages of development. Certain of the Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are designated as available-for-sale. These investments are carried at fair market value based on quoted market prices and are categorized as Level 1.

    Derivative Instruments

        The Company uses derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency option contracts to manage foreign currency exposures. All derivatives contracts are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. The fair value for derivatives is determined based on quoted spot and foreign currency exchange rates discounted to present as appropriate. The fair value of options also takes into account forward implied volatility. The valuation procedures are based upon well recognized financial principles. Although readily observable data is used in the valuations, different valuation methods could have an effect on the estimated fair value. The derivative instruments are categorized as Level 2.

    Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

        The Company has assets that are subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including assets acquired in a business combination, such as goodwill and intangible assets, and other long-lived assets. The Company reviews the carrying value of intangible and other long-lived assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable. If it is determined that the assets are impaired, the carrying value would be reduced to estimated fair market value. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company acquired Embrella. This transaction resulted in an increase to " Goodwill " and " Other Intangible Assets " of $34.6 million and $12.1 million, respectively. See Note 5 for additional information. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company had no impairments related to assets subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an $8.5 million impairment of intangible assets, primarily related to the Company's MONARC transcatheter mitral valve program, which was discontinued due to slow enrollment in the EVOLUTION II trial (see Note 3).

10.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

        The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage its currency exchange rate risk as summarized below. Notional amounts are stated in United States dollar equivalents at spot exchange rates at

69


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

the respective dates. The Company does not enter into these arrangements for trading or speculation purposes.

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  
 
  Notional
Amount
  Fair Value
Asset
(Liability)
  Notional
Amount
  Fair Value
Asset
(Liability)
 
 
  (in millions)
 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  $ 759.5   $ 12.7   $ 486.0   $ (12.5 )

Foreign currency option contracts

            53.2     (2.2 )

        The fair value of derivative financial instruments was estimated by discounting expected cash flows using quoted market interest rates and foreign exchange rates as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. Considerable judgment was employed in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value; accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

        The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheets (in millions):

 
   
  Fair Value  
 
  Balance Sheet Location   December 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

                 

Assets

                 

Foreign currency contracts

  Prepaid expenses   $ 12.7   $  

Liabilities

                 

Foreign currency contracts

  Accrued liabilities   $   $ 14.7  

        The following tables present the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations (in millions):

 
  Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
OCI on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
   
  Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
 
 
  Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
 
 
  2011   2010   2011   2010  

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

                             

Foreign currency contracts

  $ (1.6 ) $ (9.4 ) Cost of goods sold   $ (29.0 ) $ 1.8  

 

 
   
  Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 
 
  Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
 
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

                       

Foreign currency contracts

  Other income, net   $ (6.0 ) $ (5.0 ) $ (2.7 )

70


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

        The Company expects that during 2012 it will reclassify to earnings a $3.8 million loss currently recorded in " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss ." For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not record any gains or losses due to hedge ineffectiveness. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company expensed $0.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, related to the premium costs of option-based products.

11.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Plans

        Edwards Lifesciences maintains defined benefit pension plans in Japan and certain European countries. Information regarding the Company's defined benefit pension plans is as follows (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  

Change in projected benefit obligation:

             

Beginning of year

  $ 78.7   $ 60.1  

Service cost

    6.6     4.7  

Interest cost

    2.2     1.9  

Participant contributions

    1.9     1.4  

Actuarial loss

    5.7     6.0  

Benefits paid

    (2.3 )   (0.2 )

Currency exchange rate changes and other

    2.8     4.8  
           

End of year

  $ 95.6   $ 78.7  
           

Change in fair value of plan assets:

             

Beginning of year

  $ 45.3   $ 34.4  

Actual return on plan assets

    0.7     1.1  

Employer contributions

    6.3     5.3  

Participant contributions

    1.9     1.4  

Benefits paid

    (2.1 )    

Currency exchange rate changes and other

    1.7     3.1  
           

End of year

  $ 53.8   $ 45.3  
           

Funded Status

             

Projected benefit obligation

  $ (95.6 ) $ (78.7 )

Plan assets at fair value

    53.8     45.3  
           

Funded status, (under funded)

  $ (41.8 ) $ (33.4 )
           

Net amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheet:

             

Other long-term liabilities

  $ 41.8   $ 33.4  
           

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

             

Net actuarial loss

  $ (21.1 ) $ (14.7 )

Net prior service benefit

    2.9     3.2  

Net transition obligation

    (0.1 )   (0.2 )

Deferred income tax benefit

    3.8     3.1  
           

Total

  $ (14.5 ) $ (8.6 )
           

71


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

        The accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO") for all defined benefit pension plans was $84.0 million and $70.0 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The projected benefit obligation ("PBO") and ABO were in excess of plan assets for all pension plans as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

        The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Service cost, net

  $ 6.6   $ 4.7   $ 5.6  

Interest cost

    2.2     1.9     1.8  

Expected return on plan assets

    (1.4 )   (1.2 )   (0.9 )

Amortization of actuarial loss

    0.6     0.4     0.9  

Amortization of prior service credit

    (0.4 )   (0.3 )   (0.3 )

Amortization of transition obligation

    0.1          
               

Net periodic pension benefits cost

  $ 7.7   $ 5.5   $ 7.1  
               

        The net actuarial loss and prior service credit that will be amortized from " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss " into net periodic benefits cost in 2012 are expected to be $1.0 million and $(0.3) million, respectively.

        Expected long-term returns for each of the plans' strategic asset classes were developed through consultation with investment advisors. Several factors were considered, including survey of investment managers' expectations, current market data, minimum guaranteed returns in certain insurance contracts, and historical market returns over long periods. Using policy target allocation percentages and the asset class expected returns, a weighted-average expected return was calculated.

        To select the discount rates for the defined benefit pension plans, the Company uses a modeling process that involves matching the expected duration of its benefit plans to a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of AA-rated fixed-income debt instruments, or their equivalent. For each country, the Company uses the implied yield of this hypothetical portfolio at the appropriate duration as a discount rate benchmark.

        The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations are as follows:

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  

Discount rate

    2.5 %   2.7 %

Rate of compensation increase

    3.0 %   3.1 %

Social securities increase

    1.8 %   1.8 %

Pension increase

    2.0 %   2.0 %

72


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

        The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost are as follows:

 
  Years ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Discount rate

    2.4 %   3.2 %   2.8 %

Expected return on plan assets

    2.7 %   3.4 %   2.8 %

Rate of compensation increase

    2.9 %   3.2 %   3.4 %

Social securities increase

    1.8 %   1.8 %   1.8 %

Pension increase

    2.0 %   2.0 %   2.0 %

    Plan Assets

        The Company's investment strategy for plan assets is to seek a competitive rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk and to earn performance rates of return in accordance with the benchmarks adopted for each asset class. Risk management practices include diversification across asset classes and investment styles, and periodic rebalancing toward asset allocation targets.

        The Administrative and Investment Committee decides on the defined benefit plan provider in each location and that provider decides the target allocation for the Company's defined benefit plan at that location. The target asset allocation selected reflects a risk/return profile the Company feels is appropriate relative to the plans' liability structure and return goals. In certain plans, asset allocations may be governed by local requirements. Target weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2011, by asset category, are as follows:

Insurance contracts

    80.8 %

Equity securities

    10.5 %

Debt securities

    8.7 %
       

Total

    100.0 %
       

73


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

        The fair values of the Company's defined benefit plan assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010, by asset category, are as follows (in millions):

December 31, 2011
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total  

Asset Category

                         

Cash

  $ 0.3   $   $   $ 0.3  

Equity securities:

                         

United States equities

    1.4             1.4  

International equities

    4.4             4.4  

Debt securities:

                         

United States government bonds

    0.4             0.4  

International government bonds

    3.8             3.8  

Insurance contracts

            43.5     43.5  
                   

  $ 10.3   $   $ 43.5   $ 53.8  
                   

December 31, 2010
                         

Asset Category

                         

Cash

  $ 0.3   $   $   $ 0.3  

Equity securities:

                         

United States equities

    1.0             1.0  

International equities

    4.0             4.0  

Debt securities:

                         

United States government bonds

    0.4             0.4  

International government bonds

    3.1             3.1  

Insurance contracts

            36.5     36.5  
                   

  $ 8.8   $   $ 36.5   $ 45.3  
                   

74


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company's defined benefit plan assets that have been classified as Level 3 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):

 
  Insurance
Contracts
 

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $ 27.2  

Actual return on plan assets:

       

Relating to assets still held at December 31, 2010

    1.0  

Relating to assets sold during 2010

     

Purchases, sales and settlements

    5.7  

Currency exchange rate impact

    2.6  
       

Balance at December 31, 2010

    36.5  

Actual return on plan assets:

       

Relating to assets still held at December 31, 2011

    1.2  

Relating to assets sold during 2011

     

Purchases, sales and settlements

    4.6  

Currency exchange rate impact

    1.2  
       

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $ 43.5  
       

        Equity and debt securities are valued at fair value based on quoted market prices reported on the active markets on which the individual securities are traded. The insurance contracts are valued at the cash surrender value of the contracts, which is deemed to approximate its fair value.

        The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, at December 31, 2011, are expected to be paid (in millions):

2012

  $ 4.0  

2013

    4.8  

2014

    4.7  

2015

    4.8  

2016

    5.6  

2017-2021

    34.4  

        As of December 31, 2011, expected employer contributions for fiscal 2012 are $6.5 million.

Defined Contribution Plans

        The Company's employees in the United States and Puerto Rico are eligible to participate in a qualified 401(k) and 1165(e) plan, respectively. In the United States, participants may contribute up to 25% of their eligible compensation (subject to tax code limitation) to the plan. Edwards Lifesciences matches the first 3% of the participant's annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Edwards Lifesciences matches the next 2% of the participant's annual eligible compensation to the plan on a 50% basis. In Puerto Rico, participants may contribute up to 25% of their annual compensation (subject to tax code limitation) to the plan. Edwards Lifesciences matches the first 4% of participant's annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a 50% basis. The Company also provides a 2% profit sharing

75


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

contribution calculated on eligible earnings for each employee. Matching contributions relating to Edwards Lifesciences employees were $9.9 million, $8.9 million and $8.1 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        The Company has a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of employees that provides the opportunity to defer a specified percentage of their eligible cash compensation. Participants may elect to defer up to 25% of total eligible compensation. The Company's obligations under this plan are unfunded. The amount accrued under this plan was $7.3 million and $6.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        During 2001, the Company adopted a nonqualified option plan ("Executive Option Plan") for the benefit of the executive officers and other key employees. The Executive Option Plan permitted participants to receive options to purchase shares of mutual funds or common stock of the Company in lieu of all or a portion of their compensation (base salary and bonus) earned prior to January 1, 2005. The Company discontinued option grants under the Executive Option Plan and has adopted the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan to provide officers and other key employees the opportunity to defer compensation earned after December 31, 2004 to future dates specified by the participant with a return based on investment alternatives selected by the participant. The amount accrued under this plan was $9.9 million and $13.1 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

12.    COMMON STOCK

Treasury Stock

        In February 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to $500.0 million of the Company's common stock. In September 2011, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions up to an additional $500.0 million of the Company's common stock. Stock repurchased under these programs will be used primarily to offset obligations under the Company's employee stock option programs and reduce the total shares outstanding. In addition to shares repurchased under the stock repurchase program, the Company also acquired shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees.

        During 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company repurchased 3.9 million, 4.1 million and 3.0 million shares, respectively, at an aggregate cost of $303.4 million, $200.0 million and $95.5 million, respectively. The timing and size of any future stock repurchases are subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions, stock prices and other cash requirements.

Employee and Director Stock Plans

        The Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Long-Term Stock Incentive Compensation Program (the "Program") provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units for eligible employees and contractors of the Company. Under the Program, these grants are awarded at a price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant based upon the closing price on that date. Options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock granted under the Program generally vest over predetermined periods of between three to four years and expire seven years after the date of grant. Restricted stock units of the Company's common stock granted under the Program generally vest over predetermined periods ranging from three to five years after the date of grant. On May 12, 2011, an

76


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

12.    COMMON STOCK (Continued)

amendment and restatement of the Program was approved by the Company's stockholders. Under the amended Program, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Program was increased by 1.5 million shares from 44.4 million shares to 45.9 million shares. No more than 3.6 million shares reserved for issuance may be granted in the form of restricted stock or restricted stock units.

        The Company also maintains the Nonemployee Directors Stock Incentive Compensation Program (the "Nonemployee Directors Program"). Under the Nonemployee Directors Program, each nonemployee director may receive annually up to 20,000 stock options or 8,000 restricted stock units of the Company's common stock, or a combination thereof, provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $0.2 million. Additionally, each nonemployee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to which the director is otherwise entitled through the issuance of stock options or restricted stock units. Each option and restricted stock unit award generally vests in three equal annual installments. Upon a director's initial election to the Board, the director receives an initial grant of restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $0.2 million, not to exceed 10,000 shares. These grants vest 33 1 / 3 % per year over three years from the date of grant. Under the Nonemployee Directors Program, an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of the Company's common stock has been authorized for issuance.

        The Company has an employee stock purchase plan for United States employees and a plan for international employees (collectively "ESPP"). Under the ESPP, eligible employees may purchase shares of the Company's common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of Edwards Lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase. Under the ESPP, employees can authorize the Company to withhold up to 12% of their compensation for common stock purchases, subject to certain limitations. The ESPP is available to all active employees of the Company paid from the United States payroll and to eligible employees of the Company outside the United States to the extent permitted by local law. The ESPP for United States employees is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the ESPP was 5.9 million shares.

        The fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free interest rate is estimated using the U.S. Treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award. Expected volatility is estimated based on the historical-implied volatility of publicly traded options of its common stock with a term of one year or greater. The expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award, as well as historical exercise behavior, and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 7.6%.

77


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

12.    COMMON STOCK (Continued)

        The Black-Scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods:

Option Awards

 
  2011   2010   2009  

Average risk-free interest rate

    1.7 %   2.0 %   1.9 %

Expected dividend yield

    None     None     None  

Expected volatility

    27 %   26 %   28 %

Expected life (years)

    4.5     4.6     4.6  

Fair value

  $ 22.78   $ 13.08   $ 8.60  

        The Black-Scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for ESPP subscriptions granted during the following periods:

ESPP

 
  2011   2010   2009  

Average risk-free interest rate

    0.2 %   0.3 %   0.4 %

Expected dividend yield

    None     None     None  

Expected volatility

    28 %   28 %   36 %

Expected life (years)

    0.6     0.6     0.6  

Fair value

  $ 20.02   $ 12.09   $ 8.72  

        Stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2011 under the Program and the Nonemployee Directors Program was as follows (in millions, except years and per-share amounts):

 
  Shares   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
  Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2010

    11.2   $ 27.62            

Options granted

    1.1     88.55            

Options exercised

    (2.3 )   18.54            

Options forfeited

                   
                       

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

    10.0     36.50   3.3 years   $ 362.4  
                       

Exercisable as of December 31, 2011

    7.1     27.55   2.5 years     308.6  
                       

Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2011

    9.5     35.44   3.2 years     353.8  
                       

78


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

12.    COMMON STOCK (Continued)

        The following table summarizes nonvested restricted stock units and activity during the year ended December 31, 2011 under the Program and the Nonemployee Directors Program (in millions, except per-share amounts):

 
  Shares   Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value  

Nonvested as of December 31, 2010

    1.4   $ 32.73  

Granted

    0.2     86.99  

Vested

    (0.4 )   26.62  

Forfeited

    (0.1 )   37.51  
             

Nonvested as of December 31, 2011

    1.1     44.30  
             

        The intrinsic value of stock options exercised and vested restricted stock units during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $180.7 million, $190.9 million and $92.3 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options is calculated as the amount by which the market price of the Company's common stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company received cash from exercises of stock options of $42.4 million, $78.8 million and $56.4 million, respectively, and realized tax benefits from exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units of $60.7 million, $64.7 million and $31.2 million, respectively. The total grant-date fair value of stock options vested during the year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $16.9 million, $15.8 million and $15.6 million, respectively.

        As of December 31, 2011, the total remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase subscriptions amounted to $55.9 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 30 months.

13.    ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

        Presented below is a summary of activity for each component of " Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss " for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Foreign currency translation adjustments are

79


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13.    ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Continued)

generally not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to indefinite investments in non-United States subsidiaries.

 
  Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
  Unrealized
(Loss) Gain on
Cash Flow
Hedges
  Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on
Investments in
Unconsolidated
Affiliates
  Unrealized
Pension
Costs(a)
  Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
 
  (in millions)
 

December 31, 2008

  $ (17.2 ) $ (0.6 ) $ (5.7 ) $ (11.9 ) $ (35.4 )

Pre-tax period change

    17.3     (5.8 )   4.9     10.2     26.6  

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

        2.3     (0.2 )   (1.2 )   0.9  
                       

December 31, 2009

    0.1     (4.1 )   (1.0 )   (2.9 )   (7.9 )

Pre-tax period change

    (24.9 )   (11.2 )   4.5     (6.9 )   (38.5 )

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

        4.4     (1.3 )   1.2     4.3  
                       

December 31, 2010

    (24.8 )   (10.9 )   2.2     (8.6 )   (42.1 )

Pre-tax period change

    (5.2 )   27.4     (2.3 )   (6.6 )   13.3  

Deferred income tax (expense) benefit

        (10.6 )   1.2     0.7     (8.7 )
                       

December 31, 2011

  $ (30.0 ) $ 5.9   $ 1.1   $ (14.5 ) $ (37.5 )
                       

(a)
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the change in unrealized pension costs consisted of the following (in millions):

 
  Pre-Tax
Amount
  Tax Benefit
(Expense)
  Net of Tax
Amount
 

2011
                   

Prior service credit arising during period

  $ 0.1   $   $ 0.1  

Amortization of prior service credit

    (0.4 )   0.1     (0.3 )
               

Net prior service cost arising during period

    (0.3 )   0.1     (0.2 )

Net transition asset amortized during period

    0.1         0.1  

Net actuarial loss arising during period

    (6.4 )   0.6     (5.8 )
               

Unrealized pension costs, net

  $ (6.6 ) $ 0.7   $ (5.9 )
               

2010
                   

Prior service credit arising during period

  $ 0.3   $   $ 0.3  

Amortization of prior service credit

    (0.3 )       (0.3 )
               

Net prior service credit arising during period

             

Net actuarial loss arising during period

    (6.9 )   1.2     (5.7 )
               

Unrealized pension costs, net

  $ (6.9 ) $ 1.2   $ (5.7 )
               

80


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13.    ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Continued)

 
  Pre-Tax
Amount
  Tax Benefit
(Expense)
  Net of Tax
Amount
 

2009
                   

Prior service credit arising during period

  $ 0.3   $   $ 0.3  

Amortization of prior service credit

    (0.3 )       (0.3 )
               

Net prior service credit arising during period

             

Net actuarial gain arising during period

    10.2     (1.2 )   9.0  
               

Unrealized pension costs, net

  $ 10.2   $ (1.2 ) $ 9.0  
               

14.    OTHER INCOME, NET

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  
 
  (in millions)
 

Gains on investments in unconsolidated affiliates

  $ (5.4 ) $ (0.8 ) $ (1.2 )

Foreign exchange losses (gains), net

    1.9     (0.2 )   (2.3 )

Earn-out payments

    (1.0 )   (6.0 )   (2.1 )

Other

    (0.3 )   (1.1 )   1.9  
               

  $ (4.8 ) $ (8.1 ) $ (3.7 )
               

15.    INCOME TAXES

        The Company's income before provision for income taxes was generated from United States and international operations as follows (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

United States

  $ 23.6   $ 71.4   $ 93.3  

International, including Puerto Rico

    260.0     196.8     211.1  
               

  $ 283.6   $ 268.2   $ 304.4  
               

81


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15.    INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Current

                   

United States:

                   

Federal

  $ 29.1   $ 25.7   $ 46.3  

State and local

    3.0     3.2     5.8  

International, including Puerto Rico

    25.0     27.2     25.2  
               

Current income tax expense

    57.1     56.1     77.3  
               

Deferred

                   

United States:

                   

Federal

    (6.4 )   (1.8 )   (7.7 )

State and local

    1.2     (0.2 )   (1.0 )

International, including Puerto Rico

    (5.0 )   (3.9 )   6.7  
               

Deferred income tax benefit

    (10.2 )   (5.9 )   (2.0 )
               

Total income tax provision

  $ 46.9   $ 50.2   $ 75.3  
               

82


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15.    INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in millions):

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010  

Deferred tax assets

             

Compensation and benefits

  $ 51.0   $ 52.8  

Net operating loss carryforwards

    21.8     24.9  

Net tax credit carryforwards

    15.4     19.6  

Accrued liabilities

    11.8     18.1  

Benefits from uncertain tax positions

    10.3     4.5  

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

    3.3     4.8  

Inventories

    1.8     1.9  

Cash flow hedges

        5.8  

Charitable contribution carryforward

        3.5  

Other

    2.4     (1.1 )
           

Total deferred tax assets

    117.8     134.8  
           

Deferred tax liabilities

             

Property, plant and equipment

    (22.2 )   (21.9 )

Cash flow hedges

    (4.8 )    

Other intangible assets

    (3.3 )   (5.7 )

Other

    (0.3 )   (0.1 )
           

Total deferred tax liabilities

    (30.6 )   (27.7 )
           

Valuation allowance

    (32.4 )   (30.3 )
           

Net deferred tax assets

  $ 54.8   $ 76.8  
           

        During 2011, net deferred tax assets decreased $22.0 million, including items that were recorded as a reduction to stockholders' equity and did not impact the Company's income tax provision.

        The valuation allowance of $32.4 million as of December 31, 2011 reduces certain deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. This allowance primarily relates to the net operating loss carryforwards of certain United States and non-United States subsidiaries and the deferred tax assets established for impairment losses on certain investments and for certain non-United States credit carryforwards.

        Net operating loss carryforwards, and the related carryforward periods, at December 31, 2011, are summarized as follows (in millions):

 
  Net Operating
Loss
  Tax Benefit
Amount
  Valuation
Allowance
  Expected
Tax Benefit
  Carryforward
Period Ends
 

United States state net operating losses

  $ 166.6   $ 10.9   $ (2.4 ) $ 8.5     2012-2021  

Non-United States net operating losses

    5.6     1.3     (1.1 )   0.2     2012-2021  

Non-United States net operating losses

    61.3     18.2     (18.0 )   0.2     Indefinite  
                         

Total

  $ 233.5   $ 30.4   $ (21.5 ) $ 8.9        
                         

83


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15.    INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The Company has approximately $29.5 million of California research expenditure tax credits it expects to use in future periods. The credits may be carried forward indefinitely. Based upon anticipated future taxable income, the Company expects all California research expenditure tax credits to be fully utilized; accordingly, no valuation allowance has been provided.

        The United States state net operating loss carryforwards include $128.9 million of losses attributable to windfall stock option deductions. A net benefit of $5.5 million will be recorded to " Additional Paid-In Capital  " when realized as a reduction to income taxes payable.

        Approximately $56.4 million of United States federal and state tax credit and charitable contribution carryforwards are attributable to windfall stock option deductions and will be recorded as a benefit to " Additional Paid-In Capital  " when realized as a reduction to income taxes payable.

        Deferred income taxes have not been provided on the undistributed earnings of certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries of approximately $873.7 million as of December 31, 2011 since these amounts are intended to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. It is not practicable to calculate the deferred taxes associated with these earnings; however, foreign tax credits would likely be available to reduce federal income taxes in the event of distribution. In evaluating this assertion, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the profitability of its United States and foreign operations and the need for cash within and outside the United States, including cash requirements for capital improvement, acquisitions, market expansion and stock repurchase programs. Additionally, during 2010, the Company entered into a plan to repatriate all of the accumulated earnings from certain of its European subsidiaries that were previously considered to be indefinitely reinvested by the Company. A tax benefit of $1.3 million resulted from the planned repatriation of the earnings in 2010. The Company does not expect earnings in these European subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested and records the tax impact in net income currently.

        The Company has received tax incentives in Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Singapore and Switzerland. The tax reductions as compared to the local statutory rates favorably impacted earnings per diluted share for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 by $0.40, $0.34 and $0.31, respectively. The Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Singapore and Switzerland grants provide the Company's manufacturing operations partial or full exemption from local taxes until the years 2013, 2017, 2024 and 2015, respectively. The Company is engaged in negotiations with the Puerto Rican government for an extension of the Puerto Rico grant. The Singapore grant was extended during 2011 for an additional five years and will now terminate in 2024.

84


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15.    INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        A reconciliation of the United States federal statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate is as follows (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Income tax expense at U.S. federal statutory rate

  $ 99.2   $ 93.9   $ 106.5  

Foreign income tax at different rates

    (57.4 )   (28.1 )   (27.9 )

U.S. tax on foreign earnings, net of credits

    11.8     2.2     1.0  

Tax credits, federal and state

    (10.4 )   (7.8 )   (5.5 )

State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit

    4.6     4.1     4.9  

Release of reserve for uncertain tax positions related to prior years

    (4.1 )   (13.4 )   (3.8 )

Nondeductible stock-based compensation

    1.9     1.9     1.4  

Other

    1.3     (2.6 )   (1.3 )
               

Income tax provision

  $ 46.9   $ 50.2   $ 75.3  
               

    Reserve for Uncertain Tax Positions

        As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was $78.0 million and $55.1 million, respectively. The Company estimates that these liabilities would be reduced by $6.8 million and $4.7 million, respectively, from offsetting tax benefits associated with the correlative effects of potential transfer pricing adjustments, state income taxes and timing adjustments. The net amounts of $71.2 million and $50.4 million, respectively, if not required, would favorably affect the Company's effective tax rate.

        A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, penalties and foreign exchange, is as follows (in millions):

 
  December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Unrecognized tax benefits, January 1

  $ 55.1   $ 47.1   $ 35.9  

Current year tax positions

    26.0     20.8     15.7  

Increase prior period tax positions

    5.9     8.6     8.9  

Decrease prior period tax positions

    (5.5 )   (20.1 )   (9.4 )

Settlements

    (0.1 )   (0.1 )   (3.6 )

Lapse of statute of limitations

    (3.4 )   (1.2 )   (0.4 )
               

Unrecognized tax benefits, December 31

  $ 78.0   $ 55.1   $ 47.1  
               

        The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had accrued $2.0 million (net of $1.2 million tax benefit) of interest related to uncertain tax positions, and as of December 31, 2010, the Company had accrued $1.7 million (net of $1.4 million tax benefit) of interest related to uncertain tax positions.

        The Company strives to resolve open matters with each tax authority at the examination level and could reach agreement with a tax authority at any time. While the Company has accrued for matters it believes are more likely than not to require settlement, the final outcome with a tax authority may result in a tax liability that is more or less than that reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, the Company

85


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15.    INCOME TAXES (Continued)

may later decide to challenge any assessments, if made, and may exercise its right to appeal. The uncertain tax positions are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as events occur that affect potential liabilities for additional taxes, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, proposed assessments by tax authorities, negotiations between tax authorities, identification of new issues and issuance of new legislation, regulations or case law.

        At December 31, 2011, all material state, local and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006. The Internal Revenue Service has completed its examination of the Company's 2007 and 2008 tax years for all matters except for certain transfer pricing issues. The appeals process for those transfer pricing issues is on-going. The Internal Revenue Service began its examination of the 2009 and 2010 tax years during the second quarter of 2011. As a result of on-going negotiations of an Advanced Pricing Agreement between Switzerland and the United States, the expiration of statutes of limitations, and the possible settlement of on-going audits in several jurisdictions for multiple years throughout the world, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next 12 months. The range of such change could vary, but the amount of such change is not expected to be material.

16.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        In February 2008, Edwards Lifesciences filed a lawsuit against CoreValve, Inc. ("CoreValve") in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that its ReValving System infringes three of the Company's U.S. Andersen patents, later narrowed to one patent ("the '552 patent"). CoreValve was acquired by Medtronic, Inc. ("Medtronic") in April 2009. In April 2010, a federal jury found that patent to be valid and found that CoreValve willfully infringes it. The jury also awarded Edwards $73.9 million in damages. In February 2011, the District Court reaffirmed the jury decision and ruled that Edwards is entitled to recover additional damages due to CoreValve's continued infringing sales from the trial through the life of the patent, plus interest. In the same ruling, the court denied Edwards' motions for a permanent injunction, as well as its motion for increased damages relating to CoreValve's willful infringement. Both Edwards and CoreValve have appealed. A second lawsuit is pending in the same court against CoreValve and Medtronic alleging infringement of three U.S. Andersen patents. In September 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") granted Medtronic's third request to reexamine the validity of the claim of the '552 patent and in July 2011 confirmed the validity of that patent.

        In June 2011, Medtronic filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging that certain surgical valve holders and a surgical embolic filter device infringe its patents. Edwards counterclaimed against Medtronic, alleging that the Medtronic Contour 3D annuloplasty ring infringes an Edwards ring patent. By the Order of a Magistrate Judge in January 2012, the lawsuit has been stayed pending the outcome of future reexamination findings by the USPTO.

        In June 2011, Medtronic also filed another lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging that the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve infringes a Medtronic patent. Edwards counterclaimed against Medtronic, alleging that the Medtronic CoreValve heart valve infringes Edwards' U.S. Letac-Cribier transcatheter heart valve patent. Edwards' counterclaim was subsequently transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

        In March and September 2010, the Company received grand jury subpoenas for documents from the United States Attorney's Office in the Central District of California in connection with an investigation by the Food and Drug Administration. The subpoenas to the Company seek records relating to the Vigilance I Monitor model with software release 5.3 that was the subject of a voluntary field recall by the Company in June 2006. The Company is cooperating fully with the investigation.

86


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

16.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

        In addition, Edwards Lifesciences is or may be a party to, or may otherwise be responsible for, pending or threatened lawsuits related primarily to products and services currently or formerly manufactured or performed, as applicable, by Edwards Lifesciences. Such cases and claims raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the facts and circumstances of each particular case or claim, the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought, and differences in applicable law. Upon resolution of any such legal matter or other claim, Edwards Lifesciences may incur charges in excess of established reserves. The Company is not able to estimate the amount or range of any loss for legal contingencies for which there is no reserve or additional loss for matters already reserved. While any such charge could have a material adverse impact on Edwards Lifesciences' net income or cash flows in the period in which it is recorded or paid, management does not believe that any such charge relating to any currently pending lawsuit would have a material adverse effect on Edwards Lifesciences' financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

        Edwards Lifesciences is subject to various environmental laws and regulations both within and outside of the United States. The operations of Edwards Lifesciences, like those of other medical device companies, involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. While it is difficult to quantify the potential impact of continuing compliance with environmental protection laws, management believes that such compliance will not have a material impact on Edwards Lifesciences' financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

17.    SEGMENT INFORMATION

        Edwards Lifesciences conducts operations worldwide and is managed in the following geographical regions: United States, Europe, Japan and Rest of World. All regions sell products that are used to treat advanced cardiovascular disease.

        The Company's geographic segments are reported based on the financial information provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (the Chief Executive Officer). The Company evaluates the performance of its geographic segments based on net sales and income before provision for income taxes ("pre-tax income"). The accounting policies of the segments are substantially the same as those described in Note 2. Net sales and pre-tax income of reportable segments are based on internally derived standard foreign exchange rates, which may differ from year to year, and do not include inter-segment profits. Because of the interdependence of the reportable segments, the operating profit as presented may not be representative of the geographical distribution that would occur if the segments were not interdependent. Net sales by geographic area are based on the location of the customer.

        Certain items are maintained at the corporate level and are not allocated to the segments. The non-allocated items include net interest expense, global marketing expenses, corporate research and development expenses, manufacturing variances, corporate headquarters costs, special gains and charges, stock-based compensation, foreign currency hedging activities, certain litigation costs and most of the Company's amortization expense. Although most of the Company's depreciation expense is included in segment pre-tax income, due to the Company's methodology for cost build-up, it is impractical to determine the amount of depreciation expense included in each segment, and therefore a portion is maintained at the corporate level. The Company neither discretely allocates assets to its operating segments, nor evaluates the operating segments using discrete asset information.

87


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17.    SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

        The table below presents information about Edwards Lifesciences' reportable segments (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Segment Net Sales

                   

United States

  $ 605.6   $ 567.6   $ 556.1  

Europe

    549.4     460.1     392.3  

Japan

    226.8     217.7     181.7  

Rest of world

    200.8     167.2     150.8  
               

Total segment net sales

  $ 1,582.6   $ 1,412.6   $ 1,280.9  
               

Segment Pre-tax Income

                   

United States

  $ 314.9   $ 311.0   $ 303.8  

Europe

    237.9     178.9     133.3  

Japan

    107.6     101.2     84.6  

Rest of world

    60.3     49.5     44.3  
               

Total segment pre-tax income

  $ 720.7   $ 640.6   $ 566.0  
               

        The table below presents reconciliations of segment net sales to consolidated net sales and segment pre-tax income to consolidated pre-tax income (in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Net Sales Reconciliation

                   

Segment net sales

  $ 1,582.6   $ 1,412.6   $ 1,280.9  

Foreign currency

    96.0     34.4     40.5  
               

Consolidated net sales

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4  
               

Pre-tax Income Reconciliation

                   

Segment pre-tax income

  $ 720.7   $ 640.6   $ 566.0  

Unallocated amounts:

                   

Corporate items

    (436.3 )   (366.0 )   (346.0 )

Special (charges) gains, net

    (21.6 )   (22.7 )   63.8  

Interest income (expense), net

    0.3     (1.5 )   (1.1 )

Foreign currency

    20.5     17.8     21.7  
               

Consolidated pre-tax income

  $ 283.6   $ 268.2   $ 304.4  
               

88


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17.    SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Enterprise-Wide Information

        Enterprise-wide information is based on foreign exchange rates used in the Company's consolidated financial statements.

 
  As of or for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2011   2010   2009  
 
  (in millions)
 

Net Sales by Geographic Area

                   

United States

  $ 605.6   $ 567.6   $ 556.1  

Europe

    574.0     457.0     404.6  

Japan

    283.7     247.8     214.1  

Rest of World

    215.3     174.6     146.6  
               

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4  
               

Net Sales by Major Product Area

                   

Heart Valve Therapy

  $ 1,010.7   $ 838.3   $ 714.9  

Critical Care

    508.3     454.1     452.5  

Cardiac Surgery Systems

    107.5     100.2     92.8  

Vascular

    52.1     54.4     61.2  
               

  $ 1,678.6   $ 1,447.0   $ 1,321.4  
               

Long-lived Tangible Assets by Geographic Area

                   

United States

  $ 223.0   $ 180.5   $ 163.0  

International

    130.5     102.3     102.0  
               

  $ 353.5   $ 282.8   $ 265.0  
               

89


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18.    QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS AND MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S STOCK (UNAUDITED)

Years Ended December 31,
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Total
Year
 
 
  (in millions, except per share data)
 

2011

                               

Net sales

  $ 404.5   $ 431.2   $ 412.7   $ 430.2   $ 1,678.6  

Gross profit

    287.7     303.4     287.1     310.6     1,188.8  

Net income(a)

    63.9     58.1     51.6     63.1     236.7  

Earnings per common share(a):

                               

Basic

    0.56     0.51     0.45     0.55     2.07  

Diluted

    0.53     0.48     0.43     0.53     1.98  

Market price:

                               

High

  $ 91.82   $ 90.38   $ 91.50   $ 77.40   $ 91.82  

Low

    77.26     80.44     61.63     61.59     61.59  

2010

                               

Net sales

  $ 340.5   $ 365.2   $ 348.9   $ 392.4   $ 1,447.0  

Gross profit

    241.9     264.8     253.1     278.9     1,038.7  

Net income(b)

    47.7     57.5     48.0     64.8     218.0  

Earnings per common share(b):

                               

Basic

    0.42     0.51     0.42     0.57     1.92  

Diluted

    0.40     0.48     0.40     0.54     1.83  

Market price:

                               

High

  $ 50.99   $ 56.44   $ 69.29   $ 85.47   $ 85.47  

Low

    42.31     46.58     53.10     63.23     42.31  

(a)
The second quarter of 2011 includes a $4.0 million charge to reflect the increased collection risk associated with the Company's receivables in Greece.

The fourth quarter of 2011 includes (1) an $8.8 million charge to reflect the increased risk associated with its southern European receivables, (2) a $5.5 million charge related primarily to severance associated with a global workforce realignment, and (3) a $3.3 million charge related to a litigation settlement.

(b)
The second quarter of 2010 includes an $8.3 million charge for the impairment of intangible assets and clinical trial costs associated with the discontinued MONARC transcatheter mitral valve program.

The third quarter of 2010 includes a $3.9 million charge for the impairment of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates.

The fourth quarter of 2010 includes a $7.2 million charge for realignment expenses related primarily to severance associated with a global workforce realignment and a $3.3 million charge for the impairment of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates.

90


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

19.    VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 
   
  Additions    
   
 
 
  Balance at
Beginning
of Period
  Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  Charged to
Other
Accounts
  Deductions
From
Reserves
  Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
  (in millions)
 

Year ended December 31, 2011

                               

Allowance for doubtful accounts(a)

  $ 11.6   $ 9.0   $ 0.3   $ (1.9 ) $ 19.0  

Inventory reserves(b)

    11.2     15.3         (13.6 )   12.9  

Tax valuation allowance(c)

    30.3     3.1     0.4     (1.4 )   32.4  

Year ended December 31, 2010

                               

Allowance for doubtful accounts(a)

  $ 12.4   $ 3.3   $   $ (4.1 ) $ 11.6  

Inventory reserves(b)

    10.9     7.1         (6.8 )   11.2  

Tax valuation allowance(c)

    24.3     1.9     5.5     (1.4 )   30.3  

Year ended December 31, 2009

                               

Allowance for doubtful accounts(a)

  $ 9.9   $ 3.6   $   $ (1.1 ) $ 12.4  

Inventory reserves(b)

    9.1     7.2         (5.4 )   10.9  

Tax valuation allowance(c)

    22.7     1.0     4.3     (3.7 )   24.3  

(a)
The deductions related to allowances for doubtful accounts represent accounts receivable which are written off and product which is returned from customers.

(b)
Inventory reserves result from inventory which is obsolete, is nearing its expiration date (generally triggered at six months prior to expiration), is damaged or slow moving (defined as quantities in excess of a two year supply). The deductions related to inventory reserves represent inventory that is disposed of or sold as part of a business transaction.

(c)
The tax valuation allowances are provided for other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized losses related to certain unconsolidated affiliates that may not be recognized due to the uncertainty of the ready marketability of certain impaired investments, and net operating loss and credit carryforwards that may not be recognized due to insufficient taxable income.

20.    RESTATEMENT OF UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company determined that its previously issued consolidated condensed balance sheets and consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011 contained errors related to (1) its cash equivalents and short-term investments and (2) the excess tax benefit from stock plans. Neither of these errors had an impact on the consolidated condensed statements of operations.

        First, during 2011, the Company purchased bank time deposits with original maturities over three months but less than one year. The Company determined that these bank time deposits had been incorrectly

91


Table of Contents


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

20.    RESTATEMENT OF UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

classified as cash equivalents for the above mentioned periods and, accordingly, the Company has restated the presentation as reflected below. The classification error had no impact on the Company's current assets.

 
  As of March 31, 2011   As of June 30, 2011   As of September 30, 2011  
Balance Sheets
  As Reported   As Restated   As Reported   As Restated   As Reported   As Restated  
 
  (in millions)
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 433.8   $ 325.2   $ 468.2   $ 175.6   $ 451.1   $ 244.0  

Short-term investments

        108.6         292.6         207.1  
                           

Total

  $ 433.8   $ 433.8   $ 468.2   $ 468.2   $ 451.1   $ 451.1  
                           

 

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011
  Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
  Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
 
Statements of Cash Flows
  As Reported   As Restated   As Reported   As Restated   As Reported   As Restated  
 
  (in millions)
 

Cash flows from investing activities

                                     

Purchases of short-term investments

  $   $ (105.6 ) $   $ (304.3 ) $   $ (454.0 )

Proceeds from short-term investments

                14.6         237.2  

Net cash used in investing activities

    (52.5 )   (158.1 )   (63.8 )   (353.5 )   (81.4 )   (298.2 )

Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

    15.8     12.8     20.9     18.0     3.2     12.9  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    37.7     (70.9 )   72.1     (220.5 )   55.0     (152.1 )

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

    433.8     325.2     468.2     175.6     451.1     244.0  

        Second, the amounts presented in the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows as " Excess Tax Benefits from Stock Plans " for the periods ended June 30 and September 30, 2011 were not reduced to reflect the absence of cash flows from the generation of credit carryforwards and net operating losses in the United States in 2011 primarily due to significant tax deductions from stock option exercises and, accordingly, the Company has restated the presentation as reflected below.

 
  Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
  Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
 
Statements of Cash Flows
  As Reported   As Restated   As Reported   As Restated  
 
  (in millions)
 

Cash flows from operating activities

                         

Excess tax benefit from stock plans

  $ (36.4 ) $ (11.2 ) $ (47.0 ) $ (3.6 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

    74.2     99.4     171.4     214.8  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Excess tax benefit from stock plans

    36.4     11.2     47.0     3.6  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

    40.8     15.6     (38.2 )   (81.6 )

92


Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

        Background.     As previously reported in the Company's fourth quarter earnings press release, which was included in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2012, the Company determined that certain short-term investments were incorrectly shown as cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated condensed balance sheets and cash flow statements contained in its interim reports for the periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011. Since that time, the Company also identified certain errors related to the presentation of the excess tax benefit from stock plans in its consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the interim periods ended June 30 and September 30, 2011.

        Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.     The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2011. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting that is described below in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2011.

        Notwithstanding the material weakness identified in the evaluation, based upon additional analysis, the Company concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present in all material respects the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.     The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of December 31, 2011 of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management identified the following material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.

        The Company did not maintain effective controls over the completeness and timeliness of information impacting classification and disclosures related to financial reporting. Specifically, effective controls were not in place with respect to communication to appropriate financial reporting personnel from other departments of changes to information impacting classification and disclosures in the financial statements. This control deficiency resulted in a restatement to the Company's unaudited consolidated condensed balance sheets as of March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011 to correct the misclassification of short-term investments incorrectly classified as cash equivalents, and the restatement of the Company's unaudited consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011 to appropriately present the activity related to short-term investments resulting from the aforementioned

93


classification error and to correct the amount presented as excess tax benefit from stock plans as a component of cash flows from operating and financing activities. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in other classification and disclosure misstatements related to financial reporting that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, the Company's management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

        Because of this material weakness, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework as issued by COSO.

        The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

        Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.     Since December 31, 2011, the Company has begun the implementation of the remedial actions described below. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

        Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness.     Beginning in February 2012, with the oversight of the Audit and Public Policy Committee, the Company's management began to design and implement certain remediation measures to address the material weakness discussed above and to improve its internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, the Company is enhancing its controls to improve the communication to appropriate financial reporting personnel from other departments of changes to information impacting classification and disclosures in the financial statements.

Item 9B.    Other Information

        None.

94


Table of Contents


PART III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

        Certain information required by this Item is set forth under the headings "Corporate Governance," "Executive Compensation and Other Information—Executive Officers," and "Other Matters and Business—Additional Information" and "—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the definitive proxy materials to be filed in connection with its 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") (which Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2011). The information required by this Item to be contained in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all employees, including the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller. The code of ethics (business practice standards) is posted on the Company's website, which is found at www.edwards.com under "Investor Relations." The Company intends to include on its website any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of its code of ethics that apply to the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer or controller and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

        The information contained under the heading "Executive Compensation and Other Information" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

        The information contained under the headings "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

        The information contained under the heading "Other Matters and Business—Related Party Transactions" and under the heading "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

        The information contained under the heading "Audit Matters—Fees Paid to Principal Accountants" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

95


Table of Contents


PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

EXHIBITS FILED WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Exhibit No.   Description
3.1   Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, as amended and restated on February 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2009, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

4.1

 

Specimen form of certificate representing Edwards Lifesciences Corporation common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 in Edwards Lifesciences' Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-15525))

*10.1

 

Form of Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.2

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Michael A. Mussallem dated March 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.3

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Chief Executive Officer Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, as Amended and Restated March 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

10.4

 

Four Year Credit Agreement dated as of July 29, 2011, among Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrower; the lenders signatory thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, and U.S. Bank, National Association, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 8-K, filed August 4, 2011, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.5

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Severance Pay Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2000, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.6

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Executive Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.7

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective November 9, 2011)

10.8

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation of Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 in Edwards Lifesciences' Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-40434))

*10.9

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 in Edwards Lifesciences' Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-33056))

96


Table of Contents

Exhibit No.   Description
*10.12   Long-Term Stock Incentive Compensation Program (as amended and restated as of May 12, 2011)

*10.13

 

Nonemployee Directors Stock Incentive Program (as amended and restated as of November 9, 2011)

*10.14

 

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for United States Employees (as amended and restated November 10, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.15

 

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for International Employees (as amended and restated November 10, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.16

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 2010 Edwards Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix C in Edwards Lifesciences' Definitive Proxy Statement filed March 31, 2010, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.17

 

Edwards Lifesciences' Officer Perquisite Program Guidelines, as of January 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.18

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Form of original Change-in-Control Severance Agreement and form of subsequent amendments thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 in Edward Lifesciences' report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.19

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Form of current Change-in-Control Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 in Edwards Lifesciences' report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934)

*10.20

 

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Form of Indemnification Agreement

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

23

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101**

 

The following financial statements from Edwards Lifesciences' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

*
Represents management contract or compensatory plan

**
XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

97


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

    EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

February 27, 2012

 

By:

 

/s/ MICHAEL A. MUSSALLEM

Michael A. Mussallem
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

        We, the undersigned officers and directors of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint Denise E. Botticelli and Aimee S. Weisner, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them singly, to sign for us in our names in the capacities indicated below, all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and generally to do all things in our names and on our behalf in such capacities to enable Edwards Lifesciences Corporation to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
 
Title
 
Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/ MICHAEL A. MUSSALLEM

Michael A. Mussallem
 

Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

  February 27, 2012

/s/ THOMAS M. ABATE


Thomas M. Abate
 

Corporate Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting
Officer)

 

February 27, 2012


/s/ MIKE R. BOWLIN

Mike R. Bowlin

 

Director

 

February 27, 2012

/s/ JOHN T. CARDIS

John T. Cardis

 

Director

 

February 27, 2012

/s/ ROBERT A. INGRAM

Robert A. Ingram

 

Director

 

February 27, 2012

98


Table of Contents

Signature
 
Title
 
Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/ WILLIAM J. LINK, PH.D.

William J. Link, Ph.D.
  Director   February 27, 2012

/s/ BARBARA J. MCNEIL, M.D., PH.D.

Barbara J. McNeil, M.D., Ph.D.

 

Director

 

February 27, 2012

/s/ DAVID E.I. PYOTT

David E.I. Pyott

 

Director

 

February 27, 2012

/s/ WESLEY W. VON SCHACK

Wesley W. von Schack

 

Director

 

February 27, 2012

99




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 10.7

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective November 9, 2011)



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page  

ARTICLE I

 

PURPOSE

    1  

ARTICLE II

 

DEFINITIONS

    1  

2.1

 

Account

    1  

2.2

 

Administrative Committee

    1  

2.3

 

Base Pay

    1  

2.4

 

Beneficiary

    1  

2.5

 

Bonus

    1  

2.6

 

Code

    1  

2.7

 

Company

    1  

2.8

 

Compensation

    1  

2.9

 

Compensation Committee

    2  

2.10

 

Eligible Employee

    2  

2.11

 

Excess Matching Contribution

    2  

2.12

 

401(k) Plan

    2  

2.13

 

Matching Contribution

    2  

2.14

 

Participant

    2  

2.15

 

Plan Year

    2  

2.16

 

Plan Year Account

    2  

2.17

 

Separation from Service

    2  

2.18

 

Specified Employee

    2  

2.19

 

Vesting

    2  

ARTICLE III

 

PARTICIPANT DEFERRALS AND MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS

    2  

3.1

 

Deferral Elections

    2  

 

(a)    Elections

    2  

 

(b)    Evergreen Elections

    3  

 

(c)    Election Irrevocable

    3  

 

(d)    Late Election

    3  

3.2

 

Deferral Amounts

    3  

3.3

 

Excess Matching Contribution

    3  

ARTICLE IV

 

CREDITING OF ACCOUNTS AND EARNINGS

    4  

4.1

 

Crediting of Accounts

    4  

 

(a)    Participant Contributions

    4  

 

(b)    Excess Matching Contributions

    4  

4.2

 

Earnings

    4  

4.3

 

Account Statements

    4  

4.4

 

Vesting

    4  

ARTICLE V

 

DISTRIBUTIONS

    4  

5.1

 

Distribution of Benefits

    4  

 

(a)    Election

    4  

 

(b)    Timing

    4  

 

(c)    Form

    5  

 

(d)    Subsequent Election

    5  

 

(e)    Death of Participant

    5  

 

(f)    Commencement of Distribution

    5  

 

(g)    Small Benefit Cashout

    5  

5.2

 

Special Distribution Election in 2008

    5  

5.3

 

Effect of Payment

    5  

5.4

 

Taxation of Plan Benefits

    6  

i


 
   
  Page  

5.5

 

Withholding and Payroll Taxes

    6  

5.6

 

Distribution Due to Unforeseeable Emergency

    6  

ARTICLE VI

 

BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION

    6  

6.1

 

Beneficiary Designation

    6  

6.2

 

Amendments to Beneficiary Designation

    6  

6.3

 

No Beneficiary Designation

    6  

ARTICLE VII

 

AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PLAN

    7  

7.1

 

Amendment

    7  

7.2

 

Right to Terminate

    7  

ARTICLE VIII

 

MISCELLANEOUS

    7  

8.1

 

Unfunded Plan

    7  

8.2

 

Nonassignability

    7  

8.3

 

Claims Procedure

    7  

8.4

 

Indemnification

    8  

8.5

 

Not a Contract of Employment

    8  

8.6

 

Protective Provisions

    8  

8.7

 

Governing Law

    8  

8.8

 

Severability

    8  

8.9

 

Successors

    8  

8.10

 

Effect on Benefit Plans

    8  

8.11

 

Compliance with Code Section 409A

    8  

ii



EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective November 9, 2011)

ARTICLE I
PURPOSE

        This Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is designed to (1) offer selected employees of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and its affiliates certain benefits that cannot be provided under the Edwards Lifesciences Corporation tax-qualified plans and (2) provide additional opportunities for selected employees to defer compensation. This Plan became effective on January 1, 2005 for (i) Compensation earned after December 31, 2004 and deferred pursuant to the provisions of this Plan and (ii) any Compensation deferred prior to January 1, 2005 under the Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Executive Option Plan but not vested on or before such date. This Plan was amended and restated, effective January 1, 2009, to conform the provisions of the plan document to the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the "Code") and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder. The Plan was amended and restated effective July 6, 2011 to amend certain provisions to facilitate Plan administration. The Plan is hereby further amended and restated effective November 9, 2011 to allow certain additional elections for distribution of a Participant's Accounts.

        Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008, this Plan has been operated in accordance with the transitional relief established by the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Code.

        This Plan is intended to be a plan that is unfunded and maintained by Edwards Lifesciences Corporation primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA").


ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS

        2.1    Account means the account maintained under the Plan for each Participant which is credited with amounts under Article III of the Plan and adjusted periodically for investment performance under Article IV of the Plan and distributions or withdrawals in accordance with Article V. To the extent it considers necessary or appropriate, the Compensation Committee or its delegate may further divide each such Account into a series of separate subaccounts so that each category of deferred Compensation or other contribution may be credited to its own separate subcategories within that particular Account.

        2.2    Administrative Committee means the Administrative Committee as defined in the 401(k) Plan.

        2.3    Base Pay means the Participant's Base Pay as defined in the 401(k) Plan.

        2.4    Beneficiary means the Participant's Beneficiary (as defined in Article VI) designated to receive the Participant's Accounts, if any, from the Plan, upon the death of the Participant.

        2.5    Bonus means any bonus payable to the Participant under the Edwards Incentive Plan.

        2.6    Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

        2.7    Company means Edwards Lifesciences Corporation.

        2.8    Compensation means Compensation as defined in the 401(k) Plan without regard to Section 401(a)(17) of the Code.

1


        2.9    Compensation Committee means the Compensation and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Compensation Committee shall have full discretionary authority to administer and interpret the Plan, to determine eligibility for Plan benefits, to select employees for Plan participation, to determine the benefit entitlement of each Participant and Beneficiary hereunder and to correct errors. The Compensation Committee may delegate one or more of its duties and responsibilities hereunder to the Administrative Committee, and unless the Compensation Committee expressly provides to the contrary, any such delegation will carry with it the Compensation Committee's full discretionary authority with respect to the delegated duties and responsibilities. In no event, however, shall the Compensation Committee delegate its authority to select the Eligible Employees who are to participate in the Plan or its authority to amend or terminate the Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article VII. Decisions of the Compensation Committee or the Administrative Committee will be final and binding on all persons.

        2.10  Eligible Employee means any individual who is employed as a corporate officer of the Company and who is a U.S. employee or a U.S. expatriate. In addition, "Eligible Employee" means any other key employee of the Company or an affiliate who is designated as an Eligible Employee by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

        2.11  Excess Matching Contribution means the difference between the Matching Contributions allocated to a Participant's 401(k) Plan Account during the Plan Year and the amount that would have been allocated if the limitations of Sections 415, 401(k), 402(g) and 401(m) of the Code, as well as the limitations of Section 401(a)(17) of the Code, were disregarded.

        2.12  401(k) Plan means the Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan.

        2.13  Matching Contribution means the Matching Contribution pursuant to the 401(k) Plan.

        2.14  Participant means any Eligible Employee who has an Account balance in the Plan.

        2.15  Plan Year means the calendar year.

        2.16  Plan Year Account means for each Plan Year, that portion of an Eligible Employee's Account that is attributable to (i) Compensation that would have been paid in such Plan Year had payment not been deferred under this Plan and (ii) earnings credited thereto pursuant to Article IV.

        2.17  Separation from Service means separation from service with the Company and all affiliates within the meaning of Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.

        2.18  Specified Employee means a specified employee as determined under Code Section 409A pursuant to procedures established by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the applicable standards of Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and applied on a consistent basis for all non-qualified deferred compensation plans subject to Code Section 409A.

        2.19  Vesting has the same meaning as Vesting in the 401(k) Plan.


ARTICLE III
PARTICIPANT DEFERRALS AND MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS

        3.1     Deferral Elections.     

2


        3.2     Deferral Amounts.     A Participant may make a separate election to defer under the Plan with respect to each of the following amounts of earnings:

The amount of each type of Compensation deferred under the Plan will be the lesser of (i) the portion or percentage of deferral elected by the Participant for such type of Compensation (calculated prior to any deductions or withholdings) or (ii) the amount of such type of Compensation remaining available after deduction of all applicable income taxes on amounts not subject to deferral and applicable employment taxes, elective deferrals for 401(k) Plan or other employee benefit plan contributions and other required reductions applicable to total Compensation.

        3.3     Excess Matching Contribution.     An Eligible Employee will be eligible to receive a supplemental matching contribution for a Plan Year equal to the Eligible Employee's Excess Matching Contribution for that Plan Year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any changes in election by the Participant under the 401(k) Plan shall not increase or decrease either the elective deferrals under Section 3.2(a) or the Excess Matching Contributions under this Section 3.3 by an amount greater than the limit under Code Section 402(g) in effect for the year for the Participant, nor shall the Participant's action or inaction cause Excess Matching Contributions to exceed 100 percent (100%) of the matching amounts that would be provided under the 401(k) Plan absent any restrictions that reflect Code limits on qualified plan contributions.

3



ARTICLE IV
CREDITING OF ACCOUNTS AND EARNINGS

        4.1    Crediting of Accounts.

        4.2     Earnings.     Amounts credited to a Participant's Accounts under the Plan shall be credited with earnings and losses, at periodic intervals determined by the Compensation Committee, at a rate equal to the actual rate of return for such period of the investment fund or funds or index or indices or vehicle or vehicles selected by that Participant (in accordance with procedures established by the Compensation Committee) from a range of investment vehicles authorized by the Compensation Committee. The rate of return on investment vehicles shall be tracked solely for the purpose of computing the amount of benefits payable from the Participant's Accounts under the Plan. The Company shall not be obligated to make any actual investment. The available investment funds shall be subject to change periodically by the Compensation Committee or delegate thereof.

        4.3     Account Statements.     Account Statements will be generated effective as of the last day of each calendar quarter and mailed to each Participant as soon as administratively feasible. Account Statements will reflect all Account activity during the reporting quarter, including Account contributions, distributions and earnings credits.

        4.4     Vesting.     Subject to Section 8.1, a Participant shall be 100% Vested in his or her Account in the Plan at all times.


ARTICLE V
DISTRIBUTIONS

        5.1    Distribution of Benefits .

4


        5.2     Special Distribution Election in 2008.     Notwithstanding the limitations and restrictions of Section 5.1(a), Participants may make a special election to change the time and form of the distribution of one or more of their Plan Accounts provided the election is made at least 12 months in advance of the newly elected distribution date. Such election must be made prior to December 31, 2008 during the period and in accordance with the rules established by the Compensation Committee. No election under this Section 5.2 shall (i) change the payment date of any distribution otherwise scheduled to be paid in 2008 or (ii) cause a payment to be made in 2008 that was otherwise scheduled for payment in a later year.

        5.3     Effect of Payment.     Payment to the person or trust reasonably and in good faith determined by the Compensation Committee to be the Participant's Beneficiary will completely discharge any obligations the Company may have under the Plan. If a Plan benefit is payable to a minor or a person declared to be incompetent or to a person the Compensation Committee in good faith believes to be incompetent or incapable of handling the disposition of property, the Compensation Committee may direct payment of such Plan benefit to the guardian, legal representative or person having the care and

5


custody of such minor and such decision by the Compensation Committee is binding on all parties. The Compensation Committee may initiate reasonable action to ensure that benefits are properly paid to an appropriate guardian.

        The Compensation Committee may require proof of incompetence, minority, incapacity or guardianship as it may deem appropriate prior to distribution of the Plan benefit. Such distribution will completely discharge the Compensation Committee from all liability with respect to such benefit.

        5.4     Taxation of Plan Benefits.     It is intended that each Participant will be taxed on amounts credited to him or her under the Plan at the time such amounts are received, and the provisions of the Plan will be interpreted consistent with that intention.

        5.5     Withholding and Payroll Taxes.     Edwards will withhold from payments made hereunder any taxes required to be withheld for the payment of taxes to the Federal, or any state or local government.

        5.6     Distribution Due to Unforeseeable Emergency.     If a Participant (a) incurs a severe financial hardship as a result of (i) a sudden and unexpected illness or accident involving the Participant or his or her spouse or any dependent (as determined pursuant to Section 152(a) of the Code), (ii) a casualty loss involving the Participant's property or (iii) other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable event beyond the Participant's control and (b) does not have any other resources available, whether through reimbursement or compensation (by insurance or otherwise), liquidation of existing assets (to the extent such liquidation would not itself result in financial hardship) or cessation of deferrals under the Plan, to satisfy such financial emergency, then the Participant may apply to the Compensation Committee for an immediate distribution from the vested portion of his or her Account in an amount necessary to satisfy such financial hardship and the tax liability attributable to such distribution. The Compensation Committee shall have complete discretion to accept or reject the request and shall in no event authorize a distribution in an amount in excess of that reasonably required to meet such financial hardship and the tax liability attributable to that distribution. In the event a Participant receives a distribution under this Section 5.6, all deferrals under the Plan will be suspended for the remainder of the Plan Year. In addition, such Participant shall be precluded from enrolling in the Plan for the entire Plan Year beginning January 1 after the request is approved.


ARTICLE VI
BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION

        6.1     Beneficiary Designation.     Each Participant has the right to designate one or more persons or trusts as the Participant's Beneficiary, primary as well as secondary, to whom benefits under this Plan will be paid in the event of the Participant's death prior to complete distribution to the Participant of the benefits due under the Plan. Each Beneficiary designation will be in a written form prescribed by the Compensation Committee and will be effective only when filed with the Compensation Committee during the Participant's lifetime.

        6.2     Amendments to Beneficiary Designation.     Any Beneficiary designation may be changed by a Participant without the consent of any Beneficiary by the filing of a new Beneficiary designation with the Compensation Committee. Filing a Beneficiary designation as to any benefits available under the Plan revokes all prior Beneficiary designations effective as of the date such Beneficiary designation is received by the Compensation Committee. If a Participant's Accounts are community property, any Beneficiary designation will be valid or effective only as permitted under applicable law.

        6.3     No Beneficiary Designation.     In the absence of an effective Beneficiary designation, or if all Beneficiaries predecease the Participant, the Participant's estate will be the Beneficiary. If a Beneficiary dies after the Participant and before payment of benefits under this Plan has been completed, and no secondary Beneficiary has been designated to receive such Beneficiary's share, the remaining benefits will be payable to the Beneficiary's estate.

6



ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PLAN

        7.1     Amendment.     The Compensation Committee may, subject to compliance with Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, amend the Plan at any time, except that no amendment will decrease or restrict the Accounts of Participants and Beneficiaries at the time of the amendment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Compensation Committee determines that additional restrictions or limitations must be placed on the investment vehicles utilized for measuring the return on the amounts credited to Participant Accounts, the right of Participants to make investment elections with respect to their Accounts, their ability to make or change distribution elections, their ability to defer distributions, the commencement date for the distribution of their benefits and the method of such distribution or their rights or status as creditors under the Plan in order to avoid current income taxation of amounts deferred under the Plan, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, amend the Plan to impose such restrictions or limitations, cease deferrals under the Plan and/or defer distribution dates under the Plan.

        7.2     Right to Terminate.     The Compensation Committee may at any time terminate the Plan, subject to compliance with Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.


ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS

        8.1     Unfunded Plan.     This Plan is intended to be an unfunded retirement plan maintained primarily to provide retirement benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees. All credited amounts are unfunded, general obligations of the Company. The Plan constitutes a mere promise by the Company to make payments in the future in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Participants and Beneficiaries have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Plan benefits will be paid from the general assets of the Company and nothing in the Plan will be construed to give any Participant or any other person rights to any specific assets of the Company, subject to compliance with Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

        8.2     Nonassignability.     Neither a Participant nor any other person will have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer, pledge, anticipate, mortgage or otherwise encumber, transfer, hypothecate or convey in advance of actual receipt the amounts, if any, payable hereunder, or any part thereof, which are, and all rights to which are, expressly declared to be nonassignable and nontransferable. No part of the amounts payable will, prior to actual payment, be subject to seizure or sequestration for the payment of any debts, judgments, alimony or separate maintenance owed by a Participant or any other person, nor be transferable by operation of law in the event of a Participant's or any other person's bankruptcy or insolvency. Nothing contained herein will preclude the Company from offsetting any amount owed to it by a Participant against payments to such Participant or his or her Beneficiary to the extent permitted under Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

        8.3     Claims Procedure     If a claim for benefits by a Participant or his or her beneficiary or beneficiaries (the "applicant") is denied, the Compensation Committee will furnish the applicant within 90 days after receipt of such claim (or within 180 days after receipt if the Compensation Committee notifies the applicant prior to the end of the 90 day period that special circumstances require an extension of time), a written notice which specifies the reason for the denial, refers to the pertinent provisions of the Plan on which the denial is based, describes any additional material or information necessary for properly completing the claim and explains why such material or information is necessary, and explains the claim review procedures of this Section 8.3. If, within 60 days after receipt of such notice, the applicant so requests in writing, the Compensation Committee will review its earlier decision. The Compensation Committee's decision on review will be in writing, and will include specific

7


reasons for the decision, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, and will include specific references to the pertinent provisions of the Plan on which the decision is based. It will be delivered to the claimant within 60 days after the request for review is received, unless extraordinary circumstances require a longer period, but in no event more than 120 days after the request for review is received.

        8.4     Indemnification.     The Company and its Affiliates will indemnify and hold harmless the Board of Directors, the members of the Compensation Committee and the Administrative Committee, and employees of the Company and the affiliates who may be deemed fiduciaries of the Plan, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of an alleged breach in the performance of their fiduciary duties under the Plan, other than such liabilities, claims, costs and expenses as may result from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of such persons. The Company and its affiliates shall have the right, but not the obligation, to conduct the defense of such persons in any proceeding to which this Section 8.4 applies.

        8.5     Not a Contract of Employment.     The terms and conditions of this Plan will not be deemed to constitute a contract of employment between a Participant and the Company or any affiliates, and neither the Participant nor the Participant's Beneficiary will have any rights against the Company or any affiliate except as may otherwise be specifically provided herein. Moreover, nothing in this Plan is deemed to give a Participant the right to be retained in the service of his or her employer or to interfere with the right of such employer to discipline or discharge him or her at any time.

        8.6     Protective Provisions.     A Participant will cooperate with the Company by furnishing any and all information requested by the Company, in order to facilitate the payment of benefits hereunder.

        8.7     Governing Law.     The provisions of this Plan will be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California, to the extent not preempted by ERISA.

        8.8     Severability.     In the event any provision of the Plan is held invalid or illegal for any reason, any illegality or invalidity will not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, but the Plan will be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had never been inserted, and Edwards will have the privilege and opportunity to correct and remedy such questions of illegality or invalidity by amendment as provided in the Plan, including, but not by way of limitation, the opportunity to construe and enforce the Plan as if such illegal and invalid provision had never been inserted herein.

        8.9     Successors.     The provisions of this Plan will bind and inure to the benefit of the Company, the Participants and Beneficiaries, and their respective successors, heirs and assigns. The term successors as used herein will include any corporate or other business entity which, whether by merger, consolidation, purchase or otherwise acquires all or substantially all of the business and assets of Edwards, and successors of any such corporation or other business entity.

        8.10     Effect on Benefit Plans.     Amounts paid under this Plan, will not by operation of this Plan be considered to be compensation for the purposes of any benefit plan maintained by the Company or any affiliate. The treatment of such amounts under other employee benefit plans will be determined pursuant to the provisions of such plans.

        8.11     Compliance with Code Section 409A.     This Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A. Accordingly, all provisions herein shall be construed and interpreted to comply with Code Section 409A and if necessary, any such provision shall be deemed amended to comply with Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.

8




QuickLinks

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (As Amended and Restated Effective November 9, 2011)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (As Amended and Restated Effective November 9, 2011)
ARTICLE I PURPOSE
ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS
ARTICLE III PARTICIPANT DEFERRALS AND MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS
ARTICLE IV CREDITING OF ACCOUNTS AND EARNINGS
ARTICLE V DISTRIBUTIONS
ARTICLE VI BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION
ARTICLE VII AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PLAN
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS

Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents


Exhibit 10.12

         Long-Term Stock Incentive Compensation Program

(as amended and restated May 12, 2011)

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation



Table of Contents

Article 1. Establishment, Objectives, and Duration

  3

Article 2. Definitions

 
3

Article 3. Administration

 
6

Article 4. Eligibility and Participation

 
7

Article 5. Shares Subject to the Program and Maximum Awards

 
7

Article 6. Stock Options

 
8

Article 7. Restricted Stock

 
9

Article 8. Restricted Stock Units

 
11

Article 9. Performance Measures

 
12

Article 10. Beneficiary Designation

 
13

Article 11. Deferrals

 
13

Article 12. Rights of Employees and Contractors

 
13

Article 13. Change in Control

 
13

Article 14. Amendment, Modification, and Termination

 
14

Article 15. Compliance with Applicable Law and Withholding

 
14

Article 16. Indemnification

 
15

Article 17. Successors

 
15

Article 18. Legal Construction

 
16

2


EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
(Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2011)

Article 1. Establishment, Objectives, and Duration

         1.1    Establishment of the Program .    Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), hereby amends and restates the incentive compensation plan established April 1, 2000 and known as the "Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Long-Term Stock Incentive Compensation Program" (hereinafter, as amended and restated, referred to as the "Program"), as set forth in this document. The Program permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.

        The Program became effective as of April 1, 2000 (the "Effective Date") and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.

        The Program was amended and restated effective as of July 12, 2000 to clarify the definition of "Subsidiary" and was subsequently further amended and restated as of May 8, 2002, February 20, 2003, February 17, 2005, February 16, 2006, March 6, 2007, February 14, 2008, March 21, 2008, March 20, 2009, February 11, 2010, further amended on March 23, 2010, further amended and restated as of February 10, 2011, and May 12, 2011.

         1.2    Objectives of the Program .    The objectives of the Program are to optimize the profitability and growth of the Company through long-term incentives which are consistent with the Company's goals and which link the personal interests of Participants to those of the Company's stockholders; to provide Participants with an incentive for excellence in individual performance; and to promote teamwork among Participants. Awards generally are made in conjunction with services performed by the Participant within the previous twelve (12) months.

        The Program is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of Participants who make significant contributions to the Company's success and to allow Participants to share in the success of the Company.

         1.3    Duration of the Program .    The Program shall commence on the Effective Date, as described in Section 1.1 hereof, and shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board to amend or terminate the Program at any time pursuant to Article 14 hereof, until all Shares subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to the Program's provisions. However, in no event may an Award be granted under the Program on or after April 1, 2018.

Article 2. Definitions

        Whenever used in the Program, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized:

         2.1   "Award" means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Program of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.

         2.2   "Award Agreement" means an agreement entered into by the Company and each Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to Awards granted under this Program.

         2.3   "Board" or "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Company.

         2.4   "Change in Control" of the Company shall mean the occurrence of any one of the following events:

3


         2.5   "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

         2.6   "Committee" means the Compensation and Governance Committee or any other committee appointed by the Board to administer Awards to Participants, as specified in Article 3 herein.

         2.7   "Company" means Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and any successor thereto as provided in Article 16 herein.

         2.8   "Contractor" means an individual providing services to the Company who is not an Employee or member of the Board, and who does not participate in the Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Nonemployee Directors and Consultants Stock Incentive Program.

         2.9   "Covered Employee" means a Participant who is one of the group of "covered employees," as defined in the regulations promulgated under Code Section 162(m), or any successor statute.

         2.10 "Disability" shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Participant's governing long-term disability plan, or if no such plan exists, at the discretion of the Board.

         2.11 "Effective Date" shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 1.1 hereof.

         2.12 "Employee" means any employee of the Company or of a Subsidiary of the Company. Directors who are employed by the Company shall be considered Employees under this Program.

         2.13 "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto.

4


         2.14 "Fair Market Value" means, the closing price of a share of Common Stock as reported in the new York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions on the date as of which such value is being determined or, if there shall be no reported transactions for such date, on the next preceding date for which transactions were reported.

         2.15 "Incentive Stock Option" or "ISO" means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 herein and which is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and which is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422.

         2.16 "Insider" shall mean an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, director, or beneficial owner of more than ten percent (10%) of any class of the Company's equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, all as defined under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

         2.17 "Nonqualified Stock Option" or "NQSO" means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 herein and which is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422.

         2.18 "Option" means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option, as described in Article 6 herein.

         2.19 "Option Price" means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option.

         2.20 "Participant" means an Employee or Contractor who has been selected to receive an Award or who has outstanding an Award granted under the Program.

         2.21 "Performance-Based Exception" means the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m) applicable to compensation payable to Covered Employees.

         2.22 "Period of Restriction" means the period during which the transfer of Shares of Restricted Stock is limited in some way (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion), and the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, as provided in Article 7 herein.

         2.23 "Restricted Stock" means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 7 herein.

         2.24 "Restricted Stock Units" means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8 herein.

         2.25 "Retirement" means, unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement, any termination of an Employee's employment or a Contractor's service after age fifty-five (55) other than due to death, Disability or, with respect to Awards made after May 8, 2002, Cause, provided that such Employee or Contractor has at least a combined ten (10) years of service with the Company and Baxter International Inc. A Participant's number of years of service with the Company and Baxter International Inc. shall be determined by calculating the number of complete twelve-month (12) periods of employment from the Participant's original date of hire as an Employee or Contractor with the Company or Baxter International Inc. to the Participant's date of employment or service termination. Employment or service with Baxter International Inc. shall be included for purposes of determining qualification for Retirement only to the extent that such employment or service immediately, and without any break, precedes employment or service with the Company. For purposes of this definition, unless defined otherwise in the applicable Award Agreement, "Cause" means: (a) a Participant's willful and continued failure to substantially perform his duties with the Company or a Subsidiary (other than any such failure resulting from Disability); (b) a Participant's willfully engaging in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Company or a Subsidiary, monetarily or otherwise; or (c) a Participant's having been convicted of a felony. For the purpose of determining "Cause," no act,

5


or failure to act, on a Participant's part shall be deemed "willful" unless done, or omitted to be done, by the Participant not in good faith and without reasonable belief that the action or omission was in the best interests of the Company or a Subsidiary.

         2.26 "Shares" means the shares of common stock of the Company.

         2.27 "Subsidiary" means any business, whether or not incorporated, in which the Company beneficially owns, directly or indirectly through another entity or entities, securities or interests representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities or voting interests of such business.

Article 3. Administration

         3.1    General .    The Program shall be administered by the Compensation and Governance Committee of the Board, or by any other Committee appointed by the Board, which shall consist of two (2) or more nonemployee directors within the meaning of the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16 of the Exchange Act who also qualify as outside directors within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and the related regulations under the Code, except as otherwise determined by the Board. Any Committee administering the Program shall be comprised entirely of directors. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the sole discretion of, the Board.

        The Committee shall have the authority to delegate administrative duties to officers, Employees, or directors of the Company; provided, however, that the Committee shall not be able to delegate its authority with respect to: (i) granting Awards to Insiders; (ii) granting Awards that are intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception; and (iii) certifying that any performance goals and other material terms attributable to Awards that are intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception have been satisfied.

         3.2    Authority of the Committee .    Except as limited by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company, and subject to the provisions of the Program, the Committee shall have the authority to: (a) interpret the provisions of the Program, and prescribe, amend, and rescind rules and procedures relating to the Program; (b) grant Awards under the Program, in such forms and amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, Awards which are made in combination with or in tandem with other Awards (whether or not contemporaneously granted) or compensation or in lieu of current or deferred compensation; (c) subject to Article 14, modify the terms of, cancel and reissue, or repurchase outstanding Awards; (d) prescribe the form of agreement, certificate, or other instrument evidencing any Award under the Program; (e) correct any defect or omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Program or in any Award hereunder; (f) to design Awards to satisfy requirements to make such Awards tax-advantaged to Participants in any jurisdiction or for any other reason that the Company desires; and (g) make all other determinations and take all other actions as it deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Program; provided, however, that no outstanding Option will be amended to lower the exercise price or will be canceled for the purpose of reissuing such Option to a Participant at a lower exercise price (other than, in both cases, pursuant to Section 5.4) without the approval of the Company's stockholders. The determination of the Committee on matters within its authority shall be conclusive and binding on the Company and all other persons. The Committee shall comply with all applicable laws in administering the Plan. As permitted by law (and subject to Section 3.1 herein), the Committee may delegate its authority as identified herein.

         3.3    Decisions Binding .    All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Program and all related orders and resolutions of the Board shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders, directors, Employees, Contractors, Participants, and their estates and beneficiaries.

6


Article 4. Eligibility and Participation

         4.1    Eligibility .    Persons eligible to participate in this Program shall include all Employees and Contractors. Directors who are not Employees of the Company shall not be eligible to participate in the Program.

         4.2    Actual Participation .    Subject to the provisions of the Program, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all eligible Employees and Contractors those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award.

Article 5. Shares Subject to the Program and Maximum Awards

         5.1    Number of Shares Available for Grants .    Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5.4 herein, the number of Shares hereby reserved for delivery to Participants under the Program shall be forty five million nine hundred thousand (45,900,000) Shares. No more than three million six hundred thousand (3,600,000) Shares reserved for issuance under the Program may be granted in the form of Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units. The Committee shall determine the appropriate methodology for calculating the number of Shares issued pursuant to the Program. The following rules shall apply to grants of such Awards under the Program:

         5.2    Type of Shares .    Shares issued under the Program in connection with Stock Options or Restricted Stock Units may be authorized and unissued Shares or issued Shares held as treasury Shares. Shares issued under the Program in connection with Restricted Stock shall be issued Shares held as treasury Shares; provided, however, that authorized and unissued Shares may be issued in connection with Restricted Stock to the extent that the Committee determines that past services of the Participant constitute adequate consideration for at least the par value thereof.

         5.3    Reuse of Shares .    

         5.4    Adjustments in Authorized Shares .    In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, such as a stock split, or a corporate transaction, such as any merger, consolidation, separation, including a spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Code Section 368) or

7


any partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of Shares which may be delivered under Section 5.1, in the number and class of and/or price of Shares subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Program, and in the Award limits set forth in Section 5.1, as shall be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights; provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number. In a stock-for-stock acquisition of the Company, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, substitute securities of another issuer for any Shares subject to outstanding Awards.

Article 6. Stock Options

         6.1    Grant of Options .    Subject to the terms and provisions of the Program, Options may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. If all or any portion of the exercise price or taxes incurred in connection with the exercise are paid by delivery (or, in the case of payment of taxes, by withholding of Shares) of other Shares of the Company, the Options may provide for the grant of replacement Options.

         6.2    Award Agreement .    Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or an NQSO.

         6.3    Option Price .    The Option Price for each grant of an Option under this Program shall be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted.

         6.4    Duration of Options .    Each Option granted to a Participant on or after February 16, 2006 shall expire at such time, not later than the seventh (7th) anniversary date of its grant, as the Committee shall determine.

         6.5    Exercise of Options .    Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant; provided, however, that each option shall become exercisable over a minimum period of three (3) years measured from the date of grant of the option. Grants to Participants who are Retirement eligible may vest monthly over 36 months after the date of grant for grants in the first year of retirement eligibility, and monthly over 24 months after the date of grant for grants in the second and subsequent years of retirement eligibility, as determined by the Committee.

         6.6    Payment .    Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of a written notice (or such other form of notice as the Company may specify) of exercise to the Company, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares (or a satisfactory "cashless exercise" notice).

        The Option Price upon exercise of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by tendering previously acquired Shares (by either actual delivery or attestation) having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option Price (provided that the Shares which are tendered must have been held by the Participant for at least six (6) months, or such shorter or longer period, if any, as is necessary to avoid variable accounting treatment); (c) by a cashless exercise, as permitted under Federal Reserve Board's Regulation T, subject to applicable securities law restrictions and such procedures and limitations as the Company may specify from time to time, (d) by any other means which the Committee determines to be consistent with the Program's purpose and applicable law, or (e) by a combination of two or more of (a) through (d).

8


        Subject to any governing rules or regulations, including cashless exercise procedures, as soon as practicable after receipt of a notification of exercise and full payment (or a satisfactory "cashless exercise" notice), the Company shall cause to be issued and delivered to the Participant, in certificate form or otherwise, evidence of the Shares purchased under the Option(s).

         6.7    Restrictions on Share Transferability .    The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Article 6 as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, and under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.

         6.8    Termination of Employment or Service .    Each Participant's Option Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following termination of the Participant's employment with the Company or service to the Company as a Contractor. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Options issued pursuant to this Article 6, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

         6.9    Nontransferability of Options .    

         6.10    Substitution of Cash .    Unless otherwise provided in a Participant's Award Agreement, and notwithstanding any provision in the Program to the contrary (including but not limited to Section 14.2), in the event of a Change in Control in which the Company's stockholders holding Shares receive consideration other than shares of common stock that are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the Committee shall have the authority to require that any outstanding Option be surrendered to the Company by a Participant for cancellation by the Company, with the Participant receiving in exchange a cash payment from the Company within ten (10) days of the Change in Control. Such cash payment shall be equal to the number of Shares under Option, multiplied by the excess, if any, of the greater of (i) the highest per Share price offered to stockholders in any transaction whereby the Change in Control takes place, or (ii) the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Change in Control occurs, over the Option Price.

Article 7. Restricted Stock

         7.1    Grant of Restricted Stock .    Subject to the terms and provisions of the Program, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.

         7.2    Restricted Stock Agreement .    Each Restricted Stock grant shall be evidenced by a Restricted Stock Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. The Period of Restriction shall be a minimum of three (3) years measured from the grant date of the Restricted

9


Stock. If a Retirement eligible Participant retires prior to completion of the Period of Restriction, then the period of restriction shall be reduced upon retirement at the rate of 25% annually from the grant date of the Restricted Stock.

         7.3    Restriction on Transferability .    Except as provided in this Article 7, the Shares of Restricted Stock granted herein may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction established by the Committee and specified in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement, or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement. All rights with respect to the Restricted Stock granted to a Participant under the Program shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant.

         7.4    Other Restrictions .    Subject to Article 9 herein, the Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Program as it may deem advisable including, without limitation, any or all of the following:

        Shares of Restricted Stock awarded pursuant to the Program shall be registered in the name of the Participant and, if such Shares are certificated, in the sole discretion of the Committee, may be deposited in a bank designated by the Committee or with the Company. The Committee may require a stock power endorsed in blank with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock whether or not certificated.

        Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant made under the Program shall become freely transferable (subject to any restrictions under any applicable securities law) by the Participant after the last day of the applicable Period of Restriction.

         7.5    Voting Rights .    Unless the Committee determines otherwise, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock issued hereunder shall be entitled to exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares during the Period of Restriction.

         7.6    Dividends and Other Distributions .    Unless the Committee determines otherwise, during the Period of Restriction, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock issued hereunder shall be entitled to regular cash dividends paid with respect to such Shares. The Committee may apply any restrictions to the dividends that the Committee deems appropriate. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, if the grant or vesting of Shares of Restricted Stock is designed to comply with the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may apply any restrictions it deems appropriate to the payment of dividends declared with respect to such Shares of Restricted Stock, such that the dividends and/or the Shares of Restricted Stock maintain eligibility for the Performance-Based Exception.

         7.7    Termination of Employment or Service .    Each Restricted Stock Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to vest in previously unvested Shares of Restricted Stock following termination of the Participant's employment with the Company or service to

10


the Company as a Contractor. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock issued pursuant to the Program, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Article 8. Restricted Stock Units

         8.1.    Restricted Stock Units Awards .    Subject to the terms and conditions of the Program, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may issue Restricted Stock Units which entitle the Participant to receive the Shares underlying those units following the lapse of specified restrictions (whether based on the achievement of designated performance goals or the satisfaction of specified services or upon the expiration of a designated time period following the vesting of the units).

         8.2.    Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement .    Each Restricted Stock Units award shall be evidenced by a Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement that shall specify the vesting restrictions, the number of Shares subject to the Restricted Stock Units award, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. Restricted Stock Units shall vest over a minimum period of three (3) years measured from the grant date of the award.

         8.3.    Restrictions .    The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on the issuance of any Shares under the Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Program as it may deem advisable including, without limitation, any or all of the following:

        Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares subject to Restricted Stock Units under the Program shall be freely transferable (subject to any restrictions under applicable securities law) by the Participant after receipt of such shares.

         8.4.    Stockholder Rights .    Participants holding Restricted Stock Units issued hereunder shall not have any rights with respect to Shares subject to the award until the award vests and the Shares are issued hereunder. However, dividend-equivalent units may be paid or credited, either in cash or in actual or phantom Shares, on outstanding Restricted Stock Units awards, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may deem appropriate.

         8.5.    Termination of Employment or Service .    Each Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to vest in previously unvested Shares subject to the Restricted Stock Units award following termination of the Participant's employment with the Company or service to the Company as a Contractor. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Restricted Stock Unit awards issued pursuant to the Program, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

11


Article 9. Performance Measures

        Unless and until the Board proposes for stockholder vote and stockholders approve a change in the general performance measures set forth in this Article 9, the attainment of which may determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to Awards to Covered Employees which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the performance measure(s) to be used for purposes of such grants shall be chosen from among:

        Subject to the terms of the Program, each of these measures shall be defined by the Committee on a corporation, subsidiary, group or division basis or in comparison with peer group performance, and may include or exclude specified extraordinary items, as determined by the Company's auditors.

        The Committee shall have the discretion to adjust the determinations of the degree of attainment of the preestablished performance goals or the size of Awards; provided, however, that Awards which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, and which are held by a Covered Employee, may not be adjusted upward in terms of either the degree of goal attainment or size (but

12


the Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust the degree of goal attainment or the size of the Awards downward).

        In the event that applicable tax and/or securities laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing performance measures without obtaining stockholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining stockholder approval. In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that shall not qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m).

Article 10. Beneficiary Designation

        Each Participant under the Program may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Program is to be paid in case of his or her death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Company, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant's lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant's death shall be paid to the Participant's estate.

Article 11. Deferrals

        The Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer such Participant's receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant by virtue of the exercise of an Option or the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units. If any such deferral election is required or permitted, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, establish rules and procedures for such payment deferrals which shall be consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A and the Treasury regulations and rulings promulgated thereunder.

Article 12. Rights of Employees and Contractors

         12.1    Employment .    Nothing in the Program or any Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate at any time any Participant's employment or service to the Company as a Contractor, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Company or to provide services to the Company as a Contractor.

         12.2    Participation .    No Employee or Contractor shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Program, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.

Article 13. Change in Control

        Except as may otherwise be provided in a Participant's Award Agreement, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, unless otherwise specifically prohibited under applicable laws or by the rules and regulations of any governing governmental agencies or national securities exchanges:

13


Article 14. Amendment, Modification, and Termination

         14.1    Amendment, Modification, and Termination .    Subject to the terms of the Program, including Section 14.2, the Board may at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate the Program in whole or in part. However, stockholder approval shall be required for any amendment of the Program that (a) materially increases the number of Shares available for issuance under the Program (other than pursuant to Article 5.4), (b) expands the type of awards available under the Program, (c) materially expands the class of participants eligible to receive Awards under the Program, (d) materially extends the term of the Program, (e) materially changes the method of determining the Option Price under the Program or (f) deletes or limits any provision of the Program prohibiting the repricing of Options. The Committee may amend Awards previously granted under the Program.

         14.2    Awards Previously Granted .    Notwithstanding any provision of the Program or of any Award Agreement to the contrary (but subject to Section 6.10 hereof), no termination, amendment, or modification of the Program or amendment of an Award previously granted under the Program shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Program, without the express consent of the Participant holding such Award.

Article 15. Compliance with Applicable Law and Withholding

         15.1    General .    The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Program shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Program or any Award Agreement, the following shall apply:

14


         15.2    Securities Law Compliance .    With respect to Insiders, transactions under this Program are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the 1934 Act. To the extent any provision of the Program or action by the Committee or the Board fails to so comply, it shall be deemed null and void, to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Board.

         15.3    Tax Withholding .    The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Program.

         15.4    Share Withholding .    Awards payable in Shares may provide that with respect to withholding required upon any taxable event arising thereunder, Participants may elect to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares to satisfy their withholding tax obligations; provided that Participants may only elect to have Shares withheld having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to or less than the minimum withholding tax which could be imposed on the transaction. All elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing, signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations, including prior Committee approval, that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

Article 16. Indemnification

        Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Program and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the Company's approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company's Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

Article 17. Successors

        All obligations of the Company under the Program with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall, to the extent legally permissible, be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

15


Article 18. Legal Construction

         18.1    Gender and Number .    Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine; the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

         18.2    Severability .    In the event any provision of the Program shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Program, and the Program shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

         18.3    Governing Law .    To the extent not preempted by federal law, the Program, and all Award or other agreements hereunder, shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the state of Delaware without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.

* *

16




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 10.13

Nonemployee Directors Stock Incentive Program

(Amended and Restated as of November 9, 2011)

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation



Contents

Article 1.   Establishment, Objectives, and Duration     1  

Article 2.

 

Definitions

 

 

1

 

Article 3.

 

Administration

 

 

3

 

Article 4.

 

Eligibility and Participation

 

 

4

 

Article 5.

 

Shares Subject to the Program

 

 

4

 

Article 6.

 

Stock Options

 

 

5

 

Article 7.

 

Stock Issuances

 

 

7

 

Article 8.

 

Restricted Stock

 

 

7

 

Article 9.

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

8

 

Article 10.

 

Stock Appreciation Rights

 

 

9

 

Article 11.

 

Automatic Awards to Nonemployee Directors

 

 

9

 

Article 12.

 

Beneficiary Designation

 

 

11

 

Article 13.

 

Deferrals

 

 

11

 

Article 14.

 

Rights of Participants

 

 

11

 

Article 15.

 

Change in Control

 

 

12

 

Article 16.

 

Amendment, Modification, and Termination

 

 

12

 

Article 17.

 

Compliance with Applicable Law and Withholding

 

 

12

 

Article 18.

 

Indemnification

 

 

13

 

Article 19.

 

Successors

 

 

14

 

Article 20.

 

Legal Construction

 

 

14

 


Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

Nonemployee Directors Stock Incentive Program
(amended and restated as of November 9, 2011)

Article 1. Establishment, Objectives, and Duration

Article 2. Definitions


2


Article 3. Administration

3


Article 4. Eligibility and Participation

Article 5. Shares Subject to the Program

4


Article 6. Stock Options

5


6


Article 7. Stock Issuances

Article 8. Restricted Stock

7


Article 9. Restricted Stock Units

8


Article 10. Stock Appreciation Rights

Article 11. Automatic Awards to Nonemployee Directors

9


10


Article 12. Beneficiary Designation

Article 13. Deferrals

Article 14. Rights of Participants

11


Article 15. Change in Control

Article 16. Amendment, Modification, and Termination

Article 17. Compliance with Applicable Law and Withholding

12


Article 18. Indemnification

13


Article 19. Successors

Article 20. Legal Construction

14




QuickLinks

Nonemployee Directors Stock Incentive Program (Amended and Restated as of November 9, 2011) Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Contents
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Nonemployee Directors Stock Incentive Program (amended and restated as of November 9, 2011)

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 10.20

FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

        This Indemnification Agreement, dated as of                                    (this " Agreement "), is entered into by and between Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the " Company "), and                                     (the " Indemnitee ").

        WHEREAS, it is essential to the Company to retain and attract as directors and officers the most capable persons available;

        WHEREAS, the Indemnitee is a director and/or officer of the Company;

        WHEREAS, the Company and the Indemnitee recognize the increased risk of litigation and other claims being asserted against directors and officers of public companies;

        WHEREAS, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company requires the Company to indemnify and advance expenses to its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law and the Indemnitee has been serving and continues to serve as a director or officer of the Company in part in reliance on such provisions in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation;

        WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company (the " Board of Directors ") has determined that enhancing the ability of the Company to retain and attract as directors and officers the most capable persons is in the best interests of the Company and that the Company therefore should seek to assure such persons that indemnification and insurance coverage will be available in the future; and

        WHEREAS, in recognition of the Indemnitee's need for substantial protection against personal liability in order to enhance the Indemnitee's continued service to the Company in an effective manner and the Indemnitee's reliance on the aforesaid Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and in part to provide Indemnitee with specific contractual assurance that the protection promised by the Restated Certificate of Incorporation will be available to the Indemnitee (regardless of, among other things, any amendment to or revocation of such Restated Certificate of Incorporation or any change in the composition of the Board of Directors or acquisition transaction relating to the Company), the Company wishes to provide in this Agreement for the indemnification of and the advancing of expenses to the Indemnitee to the fullest extent (whether partial or complete) permitted by law and as set forth in this Agreement, and, to the extent insurance is maintained, for the continued coverage of the Indemnitee under the Company's directors' and officers' liability insurance policies;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the Indemnitee continuing to serve the Company directly or, at its request, as an officer, director, manager, member, partner, tax matters partner, fiduciary or trustee of, or in any other capacity with, another Person (as defined below) or any employee benefit plan, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:

        1.     Certain Definitions :    In addition to terms defined elsewhere herein, the following terms have the following meanings when used in this Agreement:

        " Change in Control " of the Company shall mean the occurrence of any one of the following events: (a) any "Person", as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (other than the Company, any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, and any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or such proportionately owned corporation) is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the total voting power represented by the Company's then outstanding Voting Securities; (b) during any period of not more than twenty-four (24) months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of Directors of the Company, and any new director whose election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company's stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds ( 2 / 3 ) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so


approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; (c) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other entity, other than: (i) a merger or consolidation which would result in the Voting Securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into Voting Securities of the surviving entity) more than sixty percent (60%) of the total voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person acquires more than thirty percent (30%) of the total voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company; or (d) the Company's stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets (or any transaction having a similar effect).

        " Claim " means any threatened, asserted, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or other, including any arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution mechanism, or any appeal of any kind thereof, or any inquiry or investigation, whether instituted by (or in the right of) the Company or any governmental agency or any other person or entity, in which the Indemnitee was, is, may be or will be involved as a party, witness or otherwise.

        " Expenses " include attorneys' fees and all other direct or indirect costs, expenses and obligations, including judgments, fines, penalties, interest, appeal bonds, amounts paid in settlement with the approval of the Company, and counsel fees and disbursements (including, without limitation, experts' fees, court costs, retainers, appeal bond premiums, transcript fees, duplicating, printing and binding costs, as well as telecommunications, postage and courier charges) paid or incurred in connection with investigating, prosecuting, defending, being a witness in or participating in (including on appeal), or preparing to investigate, prosecute, defend, be a witness in or participate in, any Claim relating to any Indemnifiable Event, and shall include (without limitation) all attorneys' fees and all other expenses incurred by or on behalf of an Indemnitee in connection with preparing and submitting any requests or statements for indemnification, advancement or any other right provided by this Agreement (including, without limitation, such fees or expenses incurred in connection with legal proceedings contemplated by Section 2(d) hereof).

        " Indemnifiable Amounts " means (i) any and all liabilities, Expenses, damages, judgments, fines, penalties, ERISA excise taxes and amounts paid in settlement (including all interest, assessments and other charges paid or payable in connection with or in respect of such liabilities, Expenses, damages, judgments, fines, penalties, ERISA excise taxes or amounts paid in settlement) arising out of or resulting from any Claim relating to an Indemnifiable Event, (ii) any liability pursuant to a loan guaranty or otherwise, for any indebtedness of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, including, without limitation, any indebtedness which the Company or any subsidiary of the Company has assumed or taken subject to, and (iii) any liabilities which an Indemnitee incurs as a result of acting on behalf of the Company (whether as a fiduciary or otherwise) in connection with the operation, administration or maintenance of an employee benefit plan or any related trust or funding mechanism (whether such liabilities are in the form of excise taxes assessed by the United States Internal Revenue Service, penalties assessed by the Department of Labor, restitutions to such a plan or trust or other funding mechanism or to a participant or beneficiary of such plan, trust or other funding mechanism, or otherwise).

        " Indemnifiable Event " means any event or occurrence, whether occurring before, on or after the date of this Agreement, related to the fact that the Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, trustee, agent or fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, employee benefit plan, trust or other enterprise, or by reason of anything done or not done by the Indemnitee in any such capacity (in all cases whether or not the Indemnitee is acting or serving in any

2


such capacity or has such status at the time any Indemnifiable Amount is incurred for which indemnification, advancement or any other right can be provided by this Agreement).

        " Independent Legal Counsel " means an attorney or firm of attorneys (following a Change in Control, selected in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 hereof), who is experienced in the matters of corporate law and who shall not have otherwise performed services for the Company or the Indemnitee within the last five (5) years (other than with respect to matters concerning the rights of the Indemnitee under this Agreement, or of other indemnitees under similar indemnity agreements).

        " Person " means any individual, corporation, firm, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, estate, trust, business association, organization, governmental entity or other entity.

        " Reviewing Party " means any appropriate person or body consisting of a member or members of the Board of Directors or any other person or body appointed by the Board of Directors who is not a party to the particular Claim for which the Indemnitee is seeking indemnification, or Independent Legal Counsel.

        " Voting Securities " means any securities of the Company which vote generally in the election of directors.

        2.     Basic Indemnification Arrangement; Advancement of Expenses.     

3


        3.     Change in Control.     The Company agrees that if there is a Change in Control of the Company then with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to indemnity payments and Expense Advances under this Agreement or any provision of the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws or of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation now or hereafter in effect, the Company shall seek legal advice only from Independent Legal Counsel selected by the Indemnitee and approved by the Company (which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). Such counsel, among other things, shall render its written opinion to the Company and the Indemnitee as to whether and to what extent the Indemnitee would be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Legal Counsel and to indemnify fully such counsel against any and all expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto.

4


        4.     Indemnification for Additional Expenses.     Subject to Sections 2(d) and 17, the Company shall indemnify, or cause the indemnification of, the Indemnitee against any and all Expenses and, if requested by the Indemnitee, shall advance such Expenses to the Indemnitee, subject to and in accordance with Section 2(b), which are incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with any action brought by the Indemnitee for (i) indemnification or an Expense Advance by the Company under this Agreement or any other agreement or provision of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation or of the Amended and Restated Bylaws now or hereafter in effect relating to Claims for Indemnifiable Events and/or (ii) recovery under any directors' and officers' liability insurance policies maintained by the Company, regardless of whether the Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification, Expense Advance or insurance recovery, as the case may be; provided that the Indemnitee shall be required to reimburse such Expenses in the event that a final judicial determination is made (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or lapsed) that such action brought by the Indemnitee, or the defense by the Indemnitee of an action brought by the Company or any other person, as applicable, was frivolous or in bad faith.

        5.     Partial Indemnity, Etc.     If the Indemnitee is entitled under any provision of this Agreement to indemnification by the Company for some or a portion of the Expenses or other Indemnifiable Amounts in respect of a Claim but not, however, for all of the total amount thereof, the Company shall nevertheless indemnify the Indemnitee for the portion thereof to which the Indemnitee is entitled. Moreover, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement (other than Section 17), to the extent that the Indemnitee has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any or all Claims relating in whole or in part to an Indemnifiable Event or in defense of any issue or matter therein, including dismissal without prejudice, the Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses incurred in connection therewith.

        6.     Burden of Proof.     In connection with any determination by the Reviewing Party or otherwise as to whether the Indemnitee is entitled to be indemnified hereunder, the Reviewing Party, court, any finder of fact or other relevant person shall presume that the Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification, and the burden of proof shall be on the Company or its representative to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the Indemnitee is not so entitled.

        7.     Reliance as Safe Harbor.     For purposes of this Agreement, the Indemnitee shall be deemed to have acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company if the Indemnitee's actions or omissions to act are taken in good faith reliance upon the records of the Company, including its financial statements, or upon information, opinions, reports or statements furnished to the Indemnitee by the officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries in the course of their duties, or by committees of the Board of Directors, or by any other Person (including legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors) as to matters the Indemnitee reasonably believes are within such other Person's professional or expert competence and who has been selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of the Company. In addition, the knowledge and/or actions, or failures to act, of any director, officer, agent or employee of the Company shall not be imputed to the Indemnitee for purposes of determining the right to indemnity hereunder.

        8.     No Other Presumptions.     For purposes of this Agreement, the termination of any Claim by judgment, order, settlement (whether with or without court approval) or conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere , or its equivalent, shall not create a presumption that the Indemnitee did not meet any particular standard of conduct or have any particular belief or that a court has determined that indemnification is not permitted by applicable law. In addition, neither the failure of the Reviewing Party to have made a determination as to whether the Indemnitee has met any particular standard of conduct or had any particular belief, nor an actual determination by the Reviewing Party that the Indemnitee has not met such standard of conduct or did not have such belief, prior to the

5


commencement of legal proceedings by the Indemnitee to secure a judicial determination that the Indemnitee should be indemnified under applicable law shall be a defense to the Indemnitee's claim or create a presumption that the Indemnitee has not met any particular standard of conduct or did not have any particular belief.

        9.     Nonexclusivity, Etc.     The rights of the Indemnitee hereunder shall be in addition to any other rights the Indemnitee may have under the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Delaware General Corporation Law or otherwise. To the extent that a change in the Delaware General Corporation Law (whether by statute or judicial decision) permits greater indemnification by agreement than would be afforded currently under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or this Agreement, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the Indemnitee shall enjoy by this Agreement the greater benefits so afforded by such change. To the extent that there is a conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the Indemnitee shall enjoy the greater benefits regardless of whether contained herein, or in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation. No amendment or alteration of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation or the Amended and Restated Bylaws or any other agreement shall adversely affect the rights provided to the Indemnitee under this Agreement. No limitation of the Indemnitee's rights pursuant to this Agreement shall in any way limit, or imply any limitation of, the Indemnitee's rights under any other agreement.

        10.     Liability Insurance.     To the extent the Company maintains an insurance policy or policies providing directors' and officers' liability insurance, the Indemnitee shall be covered by such policy or policies, in accordance with its or their terms, to the maximum extent of the coverage available for any Company director or officer. If the Company has such insurance in effect at the time the Company receives from the Indemnitee any notice of the commencement of an action, suit or proceeding, the Company shall give prompt notice of the commencement of such action, suit or proceeding to the insurers in accordance with the procedures set forth in the policy. The Company shall thereafter take all necessary or desirable action to cause such insurers to pay, on behalf of the Indemnitee, all amounts payable as a result of such proceeding in accordance with the terms of such policy.

        11.     Period of Limitations.     Subject to Section 17, no legal action shall be brought and no cause of action shall be asserted by or in the right of the Company against the Indemnitee, the Indemnitee's spouse, heirs, executors or personal or legal representatives after the expiration of two (2) years from the date of accrual of such cause of action, and any claim or cause of action of the Company shall be extinguished and deemed released unless asserted by the timely filing of a legal action within such two-year period; provided , however , that if any shorter period of limitations is otherwise applicable to any such cause of action such shorter period shall govern.

        12.     Amendments, Etc.     No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions hereof (whether or not similar) nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

        13.     Subrogation.     In the event of payment under this Agreement, the Company shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of the Indemnitee, who shall execute all papers reasonably required and shall do everything that may be reasonably necessary to secure such rights, including the execution of such documents necessary to enable the Company effectively to bring suit to enforce such rights. The Company shall pay or reimburse all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with such subrogation.

        14.     No Duplication of Payments.     The Company shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment in connection with any Claim made against the Indemnitee to the extent the Indemnitee has otherwise actually received payment (under any insurance policy, any provision of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation or otherwise) of the amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder.

6


        15.     Defense of Claims.     The Company shall be entitled to participate in the defense of any Claim relating to an Indemnifiable Event or to assume the defense thereof, with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnitee; provided that if the Indemnitee believes, after consultation with counsel selected by the Indemnitee, that (i) the use of counsel chosen by the Company to represent the Indemnitee would present such counsel with an actual or potential conflict of interest, (ii) the named parties in any such Claim (including any impleaded parties) include the Company or any subsidiary of the Company and the Indemnitee, and the Indemnitee concludes that there may be one or more legal defenses available to him or her that are different from or in addition to those available to the Company or such subsidiary of the Company, or (iii) any such representation by such counsel would be precluded under the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing, then the Indemnitee shall be entitled to retain separate counsel (but not more than one law firm plus, if applicable, local counsel in respect of any particular Claim) at the Company's expense. The Company shall not be liable to the Indemnitee under this Agreement for any amounts paid in settlement of any Claim relating to an Indemnifiable Event effected without the Company's prior written consent. The Company shall not, without the prior written consent of the Indemnitee, effect any settlement of any Claim relating to an Indemnifiable Event which the Indemnitee is or could have been a party unless such settlement solely involves the payment of money and includes a complete and unconditional release of the Indemnitee from all liability on all claims that are the subject matter of such Claim. Neither the Company nor the Indemnitee shall unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its or his or her consent to any proposed settlement; provided that the Indemnitee may withhold consent to any settlement that does not provide a complete and unconditional release of the Indemnitee. In no event shall the Indemnitee be required to waive, prejudice or limit attorney-client privilege or work-product protection or other applicable privilege or protection.

        16.     No Adverse Settlement.     The Company shall not seek, nor shall it agree to, consent to, support, or agree not to contest any settlement or other resolution of any Claim(s), or settlement or other resolution of any other claim, action, proceeding, demand, investigation or other matter that has the actual or purported effect of extinguishing, limiting or impairing the Indemnitee's rights hereunder, including, without limitation, the entry of any bar order or other order, decree or stipulation, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 (the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act), or any similar foreign, federal or state statute, regulation, rule or law.

        17.     Limitation of Indemnification.     Notwithstanding any other terms or provisions of this Agreement, nothing herein shall indemnify the Indemnitee in contravention of (i) the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank") or (ii) any rule, interpretation, listing standard or policy enacted in accordance with Dodd-Frank after the date hereof by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any national securities exchange on which securities of the Company are listed.

        18.     Binding Effect, Etc.     This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns (including any direct or indirect successor by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company), spouses, heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives. This Agreement shall continue in effect regardless of whether the Indemnitee continues to serve as an officer and/or director of the Company or of any other enterprise at the Company's request. The Company shall require and cause any successor (whether direct or indirect by purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company and/or its subsidiaries, by written agreement in form and substance satisfactory to the Indemnitee and his or her counsel, expressly to assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform if no such succession had taken place.

7


        19.     Severability.     The provisions of this Agreement shall be severable in the event that any of the provisions hereof (including any provision within a single section, paragraph or sentence) are held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void or otherwise unenforceable in any respect, and the validity and enforceability of any such provision in every other respect and of the remaining provisions hereof shall not be in any way impaired and shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

        20.     Specific Performance, Etc.     The parties recognize that if any provision of this Agreement is violated by the Company, the Indemnitee may be without an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, in the event of any such violation, the Indemnitee shall be entitled, if the Indemnitee so elects, to institute proceedings, either in law or at equity, to obtain damages, to enforce specific performance, to enjoin such violation, or to obtain any relief or any combination of the foregoing as the Indemnitee may elect to pursue.

        21.     Notices.     All notices, requests, consents and other communications hereunder to any party shall be deemed to be sufficient if contained in a written document delivered in person or sent by facsimile, nationally recognized overnight courier or personal delivery, addressed to such party at the address set forth below or such other address as may hereafter be designated on the signature pages of this Agreement or in writing by such party to the other parties:

All such notices, requests, consents and other communications shall be deemed to have been given or made if and when received (including by overnight courier) by the parties at the above addresses or sent by electronic transmission, with confirmation received, to the facsimile numbers specified above (or at such other address or facsimile number for a party as shall be specified by like notice). Any notice delivered by any party hereto to any other party hereto shall also be delivered to each other party hereto simultaneously with delivery to the first party receiving such notice.

        22.     Counterparts.     This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Only one such counterpart signed by the party against whom enforceability is sought needs to be produced to evidence the existence of this Agreement.

        23.     Headings.     The headings of the sections and paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to affect the construction or interpretation thereof.

8


        24.     Governing Law.     This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to contracts made and to be performed in such state without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws.

        [ Signature Page Follows ]

9


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

    EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION

 

 

By:

 

  

        Name:    
        Title:    

 

    INDEMNITEE

 

 

By:

 

 

        Name:    
        Business Address:    
        Telephone:    
        Facsimile:    

10




QuickLinks

FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 21.1

        The following corporations are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation:

Legal Entity
  State of
Incorporation/
Formation
  Country of
Incorporation/
Formation

Edwards Lifesciences Asset Management Corporation

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation of Puerto Rico

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences Financing LLC

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences International Assignments Inc.

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences International Holdings LLC

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences LLC

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences Sales Corporation

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc.

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences World Trade Corporation

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc.

  Delaware   U.S.

Embrella Cardiovascular, Inc.

  Delaware   U.S.

Edwards Lifesciences Austria GmbH

      Austria

Edwards Lifesciences Pty. Limited

      Australia

Edwards Lifesciences S.P.R.L.

      Belgium

Edwards Lifesciences Macchi Ltda.

      Brazil

Edwards Lifesciences Participacoes e Comercial Ltda.

      Brazil

Edwards Lifesciences Comercio e Industria de Produtos Medico-Cirurgicos Ltda.

      Brazil

Edwards Lifesciences (Canada) Inc.

      Canada

Edwards Lifesciences A/S

      Denmark

Edwards Lifesciences World Trade (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

      China

Edwards Lifesciences SAS

      France

Edwards Lifesciences Services GmbH

      Germany

Edwards Lifesciences Hellas, EPE

      Greece

Edwards Lifesciences (India) Private Limited

      India

Edwards Lifesciences (Israel) Ltd

      Israel

Edwards Lifesciences Italia SpA

      Italy

Edwards Lifesciences (Japan) Limited

      Japan

Edwards Lifesciences Korea Co., Ltd.

      Korea

Edwards Lifesciences Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

      Mexico

Edwards Lifesciences B.V.

      The Netherlands

Edwards Lifesciences Holding B.V.

      The Netherlands

Edwards Lifesciences (Poland) Ltd.

      Poland

Edwards Lifesciences (Portugal) Comércio e Distribuicao de Dispositivos Medicos, Lda.

      Portugal

Edwards Lifesciences Export (Puerto Rico) Corporation

      Puerto Rico

Edwards Lifesciences (Asia) Pte., Ltd.

      Singapore

Edwards Lifesciences (Singapore) Pte Ltd

      Singapore

Edwards Lifesciences (Proprietary) LTD

      South Africa

Edwards Lifesciences S.L.

      Spain

Edwards Lifesciences Nordic AB

      Sweden

Edwards Lifesciences AG

      Switzerland

Edwards Lifesciences Technology S.A.R.L.

      Switzerland

Edwards Lifesciences IPRM AG

      Switzerland

Edwards Lifesciences (Taiwan) Corporation

      Taiwan

Edwards Lifesciences (Thailand) Ltd.

      Thailand

Edwards Lifesciences Limited

      United Kingdom

Whitland Research Limited

      United Kingdom



QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-33054, 333-33056, 333-40434, 333-52332, 333-52334, 333-52346, 333-60670, 333-98219, 333-105961, 333-127260, 333-150810, 333-154242, and 333-168462) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-155744) of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2012 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Irvine, California
February 27, 2012




QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.1

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION

I, Michael A. Mussallem, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 
   
   
    By:   /s/ MICHAEL A. MUSSALLEM

Michael A. Mussallem
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

February 27, 2012




QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.2

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas M. Abate, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 
   
   
    By:   /s/ THOMAS M. ABATE

Thomas M. Abate
Corporate Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting Officer)

February 27, 2012




QuickLinks


QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 32

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael A. Mussallem, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas M. Abate, Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

February 27, 2012   /s/ MICHAEL A. MUSSALLEM

Michael A. Mussallem
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

February 27, 2012

 

/s/ THOMAS M. ABATE

Thomas M. Abate
Corporate Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting Officer)



QuickLinks