Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Index to Financial Statements

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012

or

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to                         

Commission File Number 001-32490

HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  87-0400335
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)

12012 Wickchester Lane, #475
Houston, Texas 77079

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(713) 353-9400
(Issuer's telephone number, including area code)

        Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of Each Class   Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value   NYSE

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act o  Yes     ý  No

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act o  Yes     ý  No

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý  Yes     o  No

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý  Yes     o  No

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer  o   Accelerated filer  ý   Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company  o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act) o  Yes     ý  No

        As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $383,267,850 based on the closing sale price as reported on the NYSE. We had 167,425,232 shares of common stock outstanding on September 6, 2012.

   


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

  1


Item 1.


 


Business


 


1


Item IA.


 


Risk Factors


 


10


Item 1B.


 


Unresolved Staff Comments


 


22


Item 2.


 


Properties


 


22


Item 3.


 


Legal Proceedings


 


22


Item 4.


 


Mine Safety Disclosures


 


23


Part II


 


24


Item 5.


 


Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


 


24


Item 6.


 


Selected Financial Data


 


27


Item 7.


 


Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


 


27


Item 7A.


 


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


 


33


Item 8.


 


Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


 


33


Item 9.


 


Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures


 


34


Item 9A.


 


Controls and Procedures


 


34


Item 9B.


 


Other Information


 


35


PART III


 


35


Item 10.


 


Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


 


35


Item 11.


 


Executive Compensation


 


41


Item 12.


 


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


 


52


Item 13.


 


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


 


55


Item 14.


 


Principal Accounting Fees and Services


 


56


PART IV


 


57


Item 15.


 


Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules


 


57


SIGNATURES


 


61

Table of Contents


PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

        This Report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27 A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21 E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, expectations, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical facts. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "plan," "project," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," or "think." Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. We assume no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on changes in plans or expectations or otherwise.

        As used herein, references to "Hyperdynamics," "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Hyperdynamics Corporation and our subsidiaries.

Item 1.    Business

Overview

        We are an independent oil and gas exploration company that was incorporated in 1996 as a Delaware corporation with large prospects in offshore Republic of Guinea ("Guinea") in Northwest Africa pursuant to rights granted to us by Guinea (the "Concession") under a Hydrocarbon Production Sharing Contract, as amended ("PSC"). We are the operator and hold a 77% interest. Our participant, Dana Petroleum, PLC ("Dana"), which is a subsidiary of the Korean National Oil Corporation, holds the remaining 23% interest in the Concession.

        In October 2011, we commenced drilling operations on the Sabu-1 well. In February 2012, the Sabu-1 well reached the planned total depth of 3,600 meters. The well encountered oil shows while drilling the targeted Upper Cretaceous section and our well-log interpretations indicated the presence of residual oil in non-commercial quantities. Subsequent analysis of rock samples from the well has confirmed the presence of hydrocarbons in fluid inclusions in the rock. We believe: (1) the Sabu-1 well was not a commercial success because of the lack of reservoir seal (such as marine shales or reservoir-seal pairs) needed for a commercial accumulation, and (2) that the evidence that hydrocarbon generation has taken place in the basin enhances the prospectivity of our Concession.

        We have conducted 2-dimensional ("2D") and 3-dimensional ("3D") surveys of a portion of the Concession. The acquisition phase of the most recent 3D seismic survey covering approximately 4,000 square kilometers in the deeper water portion of the Concession was recently completed by the CGG Veritas Ocean Endeavor. Processing of the most recent 3D data set is in progress. The first preliminary time section results were received in March 2012. Completion of this processing work is expected in early calendar year 2013. The cost for acquiring the survey, processing and other services is expected to total approximately $30.0 million gross, or $23.1 million for our 77% interest. Of these estimated costs, we have incurred approximately $26.3 million on a gross basis as of June 30, 2012.

        We seek to sell, or farm-out, a 40% interest in the Concession to an experienced oil and gas company that would also serve as operator of the project going forward. Several companies are reviewing our data, and we expect the farm-out process to be completed by the end of calendar year 2012.

        We intend to continue acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties. At this time, we have no source of operating revenue and there is no assurance when we will, if ever. We have no

1


Table of Contents

operating cash flows and will require substantial additional funds, through additional participants, securities offerings, or through other means, to fulfill our business plans.

        Our principal executive offices are located at 12012 Wickchester Lane, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77079, and our telephone number is (713) 353-9400.

OPERATIONS OFFSHORE GUINEA

The PSC

        We have been conducting exploration work related to offshore Guinea since 2002. On September 22, 2006, we, acting through our wholly owned subsidiary, SCS Corporation Ltd ("SCS"), entered into the PSC with Guinea. Under that agreement, we were granted certain exclusive contractual rights by Guinea to explore and exploit offshore oil and gas reserves, if any, off the coast of Guinea. We refer to the rights granted to us by Guinea as the Concession and to the offshore area subject to the Concession as the "Contract Area."

        On March 25, 2010, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the PSC with Guinea (the "PSC Amendment"). In May 2010, the government of Guinea issued a Presidential Decree approving the PSC, as amended by the PSC Amendment. The PSC Amendment clarified that we retained a Contract Area of approximately 9,650 square miles, which is approximately equivalent to 30% of the original Contract Area under the PSC, following a December 31, 2009 relinquishment of approximately 70% of the original Contract Area. The PSC Amendment requires that we relinquish an additional 25% of the retained Contract Area by September 30, 2013. Under the terms of the PSC Amendment, the first exploration period ended and the Company entered into the second exploration period on September 21, 2010. The second exploration period runs until September 2013, may be renewed to September 2016 and may be extended for one additional year to allow the completion of a well in process and for two additional years to allow the completion of the appraisal of any discovery made. Under the PSC Amendment, we were required to drill an exploration well, which had to be commenced by year-end 2011, and drilled to a minimum depth of 2,500 meters below seabed. This requirement was satisfied with the drilling of the Sabu-1 well which was commenced during October of 2011 and reached the minimum depth of 2,500 meters below the seabed in February of 2012. We were also required to acquire at least 2,000 square kilometers of 3D seismic data which was satisfied by the 3,600 square kilometer seismic acquisition in 2010-2011. To satisfy the September 2013-2016 work requirement, we are required to drill an additional exploration well, which is to be commenced by the end of September 2016, to a minimum depth of 2,500 meters below seabed. The PSC Amendment requires the expenditure of $15 million on each of the exploration wells ($30 million in the aggregate). We spent greater than $15 million on the first exploration well and we expect the cost of our next exploration well to be significantly greater than $15 million.

        Fulfillment of work obligations exempts us from expenditure obligations, and exploration work in excess of minimum work obligations for each exploration period may be carried forward to the following exploration period.

        Under the PSC Amendment, Guinea may participate in development of any discovery at a participating interest of up to 15% of costs being carried for its share. The cost of that carry is to be recovered out of 62.5% of Guinea's share of cost and profit oil. The PSC Amendment removed the right of first refusal held by us covering the relinquished acreage under the original PSC. The PSC Amendment clarified that only those eligible expenditures, which were made following the date the PSC was signed, on September 22, 2006, are eligible for cost recovery. We are required to establish an annual training budget of $200,000 for the benefit of Guinea's oil industry personnel, and we are also obligated to pay an annual surface tax of $2.00 per square kilometer on our retained Concession acreage. The PSC Amendment also provides that should the Guinea government note material

2


Table of Contents

differences between provisions of the PSC Amendment and international standards or the Petroleum Code, the parties will renegotiate the relevant articles.

Assignment of Participating Interest to Dana

        On December 4, 2009, we entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement ("SPA") with Dana for Dana to acquire a 23% participating interest in the PSC. On January 28, 2010, we closed on the transaction with Dana, and we entered into an Assignment of Participating Interest (the "Assignment"), a Deed of Assignment and Joint Operating Agreement ("JOA"). Pursuant to the Assignment, we assigned to Dana an undivided 23% of our participating interest in the contractual interests, rights, obligations and duties under the PSC. As required by the PSC, the Deed of Assignment was delivered as the necessary notice of the Assignment to be given to the Guinean government.

        As part of the obligation to bear the proportionate share of costs, the SPA required Dana to make a cash payment to us upon closing the Assignment to Dana in the amount of $1.7 million for Dana's pro-rata portion of accrued expenditures associated with our marine 2D seismic data acquisition program within the Contract Area. The $1.7 million payment was received by us on February 4, 2010 and was recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of our Concession.

Joint Operating Agreement

        In May 2010, we received an administrative order from the Ministry of Mines and Geology of Guinea, referred to as an arrêté, confirming the Guinea government's approval of the assignment of a 23% participating interest in the PSC to Dana. On May 20, 2010, we received a payment of $19.6 million in cash from Dana as payment for the assigned 23% participating interest in the contractual interests, rights, obligations and duties under the PSC.

        The JOA appoints us as the operator for purposes of conducting oil and gas exploration and production activities within the retained Contract Area. We share operating costs of joint operations with Dana in proportion to the parties' respective participating interests (Hyperdynamics, 77% and Dana, 23%). An operating committee and voting procedures are established in the JOA whereby managerial and technical representatives of Hyperdynamics and Dana make decisions regarding joint operations, exploration and appraisal of commercial discoveries, and the disposition of commercial production. The JOA places restrictions upon the transfer of the parties' respective participating interests in the form of a right of first purchase that is triggered by a proposed transfer.

PGS Geophysical AS, Norway

        On June 11, 2010, we entered into an Agreement for the Supply of Marine Seismic Data ("PGS Seismic Contract") with PGS Geophysical AS, Norway ("PGS"). Under the terms of the PGS Seismic Contract, PGS agreed to conduct the acquisition phase of a 3,635 square kilometer 3D seismic survey of the area that is subject to our rights, or concession, to explore and exploit offshore oil and gas reserves off the coast of Guinea. The intended purpose of the PGS seismic survey was to obtain detailed imaging of the multiple prospects which were identified from our prior 2D seismic data acquisition over the Concession.

        Under the terms of the PGS Seismic Contract, PGS agreed to carry out the survey in two separate portions that commenced in August 2010. The acquisition work was completed in December 2010, with a final cost under the PGS Seismic Contract of approximately $24.7 million, including mobilization and demobilization expenses. Our share of the cost was 77% of that amount, or approximately $19.0 million.

3


Table of Contents

PGS Americas, Inc.

        We contracted with PGS Americas, Inc. to process the data from the PGS seismic acquisition surveys completed in December 2010. The processing work was completed in June 2011 with a final cost of approximately $3.5 million with our 77% share being approximately $2.7 million.

CGG Veritas

        The acquisition phase of the most recent 3D seismic survey covering approximately 4,000 square kilometers in the deeper water portion of the Concession (referred to as Survey C) was recently completed by the CGG Veritas Ocean Endeavor. Processing of the most recent 3D data set is in progress. Completion of this processing work is expected in early calendar year 2013. The cost for acquiring the survey, processing and other services is expected to total approximately $30.0 million gross, or $23.1 million based upon our current 77% interest in the Guinea Concession, of which, we have paid $25.8 million on a gross basis as of June 30, 2012 or $19.9 million based upon our 77% share.

AGR Peak Well Management Limited

        We contracted with AGR Peak Well Management Limited ("AGR") to manage our exploration drilling project in offshore Republic of Guinea and to handle well construction project management services, logistics, tendering and contracting for materials as well as overall management responsibilities for the drilling program. The Sabu-1 well was drilled under this contract. The cost incurred on the Sabu-1 well is approximately $125.9 million, or approximately $96.9 million for our 77% interest which was significantly higher than expected. On June 21, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, SCS, filed suit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well.

Exploration Strategies and Work to Date

        Our business plan incorporates a multi-channel approach to exploring and developing our Contract Area under the PSC. We plan to continue to develop and evaluate drilling targets and complete technical work and planning with Dana. We have completed the acquisition phase of the most recent 3D seismic survey covering approximately 4,000 square kilometers on our Contract Area. This most recent 3D survey allows us to study Upper Cretaceous submarine fan structures along the Transform Margin trend of Guinea.

        From the inception of our involvement in Guinea beginning in 2002, we have accomplished critical exploration work including:

    a 1,000 kilometer 2D seismic data shoot, the processing of the seismic data acquired, and the evaluation of that data and data that had been acquired in the past;

    a 4,000 kilometer 2D seismic data shoot, the processing of the seismic data acquired, and the evaluation of that data and data that had been acquired in the past;

    acquisition and geochemical analysis of core samples from the Contract Area and a satellite seeps study;

    third party interpretation and analysis of our seismic data, performed by PGS;

    reconnaissance within Guinea to evaluate drilling infrastructure, support services, and the operating environment;

    a 2,800 kilometer 2D seismic data shoot, the processing of the seismic data acquired, and the evaluation of that data and data that had been acquired in the past;

4


Table of Contents

    an oil seep study performed by TDI Brooks;

    a 10,400 kilometer 2D seismic data shoot, the processing of the seismic data acquired, and the evaluation of that data;

    a 3,635 square kilometer 3D seismic data shoot, the processing of the seismic data acquired, and the evaluation of that data;

    completion of the drilling of the Sabu-1, an exploratory well and continuing evaluation of core and fluid samples from that well bore; and

    a 4,000 square kilometer 3D seismic data shoot, the continuing processing of the seismic data acquired, and the evaluation of that data.

        We are currently seeking to sell, or farm-out, a 40% interest in the Concession to an experienced oil and gas company that would also serve as operator of the project going forward. Several companies are reviewing our data, and we expect the farm-out process to be completed by the end of calendar year 2012.

Political Climate and Social Responsibility in Guinea

        We established in Guinea, SCS Guinea SARL ("SCSG"), as a wholly owned subsidiary of SCS. SCSG's results are included in SCS. SCSG maintains a visible in-country presence and conducts public relations programs to educate the Guinea people and its government about the importance of their petroleum resources and our role in helping Guinea realize the benefits from exploiting these resources. As part of the public relations program, SCSG makes donations to projects which improve conditions in villages, to non-governmental organizations, to schools, and to religious organizations in order to support these efforts as well as to cultivate positive public sentiment towards us in Guinea. Guinea is an emerging democracy, and it has unique social, political, and economic challenges. Public opinion strongly influences the political decision-making process. Therefore, our public relations and social programs support a strategy to maintain a positive corporate image for us in Guinea.

5


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES

        The Contract Area is located in the Transform Margin play, offshore Guinea. We have the exclusive exploration and production rights to explore and develop approximately 9,650 square miles in offshore Guinea (see map below).

GRAPHIC

        Our prospects are set in an underexplored basin among multiple highly prospective trends with multiple play types: Turbidite fans, 4-way closures and Neocomian-age Carbonates.

        The concession has had two wells drilled to date: the GU-2B-1 well (1977) and the Sabu-1 well (2012). The GU-2B-1 well was drilled by another company in 100 meters of water reaching a total depth of 3,353 meters below sea level. Drilling of the Sabu-1 well, was finished in February 2012 in 710 meters of water with the Jasper Explorer Drillship, reaching a total depth of 3,601 meters below sea level.

        The GU-2B-1 well drilled in 1977 demonstrated good Upper Cretaceous shelf reservoirs and source rock. The oil seep and oil slick evaluation done by us in 2009 indicated a working petroleum system with mature Upper Cretaceous marine source. Well data from the Sabu-1 well also confirmed to us the presence of a working petroleum system. Hydrocarbons in fluid inclusions in the rock drilled in the well demonstrate that the well was part of an oil-migration pathway, and oil and gas shows during drilling of the well indicate the presence of hydrocarbons in the upper Cretaceous section. Our well-log interpretations indicated residual oil (noncommercial oil saturations) in a 400-meter section of the Upper Cretaceous. The fluid sampling of Upper Cretaceous intervals did not find movable oil. Our interpretation is that the Sabu-1 well was not a commercial success because it lacked a reservoir seal (such as thick marine shales or reservoir-seal pairs) needed for a commercial accumulation.

6


Table of Contents

        The Concession is covered by approximately 18,200 kilometers of 2D seismic acquired by us and 7,635 square kilometers of 3D seismic (with 4,000 square kilometers acquired during fiscal 2012 in the deepwater portion of the block). The most recent 3D seismic (Survey C), currently being interpreted using an early "fast-track" version of processing, shows thick wedges of sediment that may contain deep water sandstone reservoirs with marine shale seals which can trap significant oil accumulations, similar to recent discoveries on trend. The Sabu-1 well results, demonstrating good reservoir and a working petroleum system, should de-risk the deeper water exploration program and support the possibility of a continuation into Guinea of the oil-prone play along the Equatorial Atlantic margin.

        Multiple recent discoveries have been made by other companies along the Equatorial Atlantic margin (the Transform Margin play), extending from Ghana to Sierra Leone and now possibly into Guinea. In addition, the Central North Atlantic margin of northwest Africa, located to the north, appears to continue southward into offshore Guinea and the northern portion of the PSC. Accordingly, the discoveries and producing fields along the Central North Atlantic margin from Mauritania through Senegal and Guinea Bissau indicate to us additional exploration potential for the northern portion of the Concession.

        During the remainder of 2012, we intend to continue to process and interpret the 3D seismic survey over the deep water fan trend and analyze the Sabu-1 well data with an intention to initiate a new drilling program. The 3D seismic profile from fast track processing of 2012 survey represents an early view of the most recent 3D survey (Survey C) where deep-water submarine fan geometries can be seen.

Reserves Reported To Other Agencies

        We have not reported any estimates of proved or probable net oil or gas reserves to any federal authority or agency since July 1, 2008, on producing properties owned in the United States at that time, but subsequently sold in 2009.

Production

        As a result of the 2009 sale of our oil and gas operations located in the United States, we currently have no producing properties and have had no production during the years covered by these financial statements.

Delivery Commitments

        We currently have no existing contracts or agreements obligating us to provide a fixed or determinable quantity of oil or gas in the future.

Employees and Independent Contractors

        As of September 6, 2012, we have 35 full time employees based in the United States, 2 full time employees in the United Kingdom and 9 full time employees in Guinea. Additionally, we use independent contractors in the United States and the United Kingdom to help manage fixed overhead expenses. No employees are represented by a union.

Competition

        Many companies and individuals engage in drilling for gas and oil and there is competition for the most desirable prospects. We expect to encounter intense competition from other companies and other entities in the sale of our oil and gas. We could be competing with numerous oil and gas companies which may have financial resources significantly greater than ours.

7


Table of Contents

Productive Wells and Acreage; Undeveloped Acreage

        We currently do not have any productive oil or gas wells, and do not have any developed acres ( i.e.  acres spaced or assignable to productive wells). The following table sets forth undeveloped acreage that we held as of June 30, 2012:

 
  Undeveloped
Acreage(1)(2)
 
 
  Gross
Acres
  Net
Acres
 

Foreign

             

Offshore Guinea

    6,176,000     4,755,520  
           

Total(3)

    6,176,000     4,755,520  

(1)
A gross acre is an acre in which a working interest is owned. A net acre is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working or participation interests in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof. Undeveloped acreage is considered to be those leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of crude oil and natural gas regardless of whether or not such acreage contains proved reserves.

(2)
One square mile equals 640 acres. Our Contract Area is approximately 9,650 square miles. We have a 77% working interest in this contract area.

(3)
The PSC requires that we relinquish 25% of the retained Contract Area by September 2013.

Drilling Activity

        An exploratory well is a well drilled to find and produce crude oil or natural gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of crude oil or natural gas in another reservoir, or to extend a known reservoir. A development well is a well drilled within the proved area of a crude oil or natural gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive. We drilled no development wells for each of the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 or 2010.

        In October 2011, we commenced drilling operations on the Sabu-1 well. In February 2012, the Sabu-1 exploratory well reached the planned total depth of 3,600 meters. We drilled no exploratory wells for the years ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.

Geographical Information

        The following table sets out long-lived assets associated with Guinea, including our investment in the Concession offshore Guinea as well as fixed assets:

 
  June 30,
2012
  June 30,
2011
  June 30,
2010
 

Long-lived assets related to Guinea

  $ 39,617,000   $ 36,716,000   $ 339,000  

        The seismic data we have collected and our geological and geophysical work product are maintained in our offices in the United States. The June 30, 2012 amount of $39.6 million is net of $116.3 million of costs which were fully amortized though our Full-Cost Ceiling Test as a result of the Sabu-1 exploratory well being non-commercial.

8


Table of Contents

Cost of Compliance with Environmental Laws

        Environmental laws have not materially hindered nor adversely affected our business. Capital expenditures relating to environmental control facilities have not been prohibitive to our operations. We believe we are in compliance with all applicable environmental laws.

Available Information

        We are currently subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). We file periodic reports, proxy materials and other information with the SEC. In addition, we expect to furnish stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements certified by our independent registered public accounting firm and interim reports containing unaudited financial information as may be necessary or desirable. We will provide without charge to each person who receives a copy of this report, upon written or oral request, a copy of any information that is incorporated by reference in this report (not including exhibits to the information that is incorporated by reference unless the exhibits are themselves specifically incorporated by reference). Such request should be directed to: Jason Davis, Secretary, Hyperdynamics Corporation, 12012 Wickchester Lane, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77079, voice: (713) 353-9400, fax: (713) 353-9421. Our website Internet address is www.hyperdynamics.com.

        We provide free of charge on our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable.

        Members of the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, and Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Internet address of the Commission is www.sec.gov. That website contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, like Hyperdynamics, that file electronically with the Commission. Visitors to the Commission's website may access such information by searching the EDGAR database.

9


Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

        An investment in our common stock involves significant risks. Prior to making a decision about investing in common stock, and in consultation with your own financial and legal advisors, you should carefully consider, among other matters, the following risk factors. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also inadvertently affect us. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially harmed.

Risks Relating to Our Business and the Industry in Which We Operate.

We depend on a single exploration asset.

        The Concession is currently our single most important asset and constitutes our greatest potential for the future generation of revenue. In addition to the exploratory well, the Sabu-1, that we recently drilled, we are required under the PSC to drill a minimum of one additional exploration well to a minimum depth of 2,500 meters below the seabed at a minimum cost of $15 million by September 21, 2016. The PSC has other work and additional obligations that we will need to perform to maintain compliance with the PSC. Failure to comply could subject us to risk of loss of the Concession. In addition, oil and natural gas operations in Africa may be subject to higher political and security risks than operations in the United States. Any adverse development affecting our operations such as, but not limited to, the drilling and operational hazards described below, could result in damage to, or destruction of, any wells and producing facilities constructed on the Concession as well as damage to life. Although we may acquire producing assets to diversify our asset base, given that the Concession is currently our only major asset, any adverse development affecting it could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

We have no proved reserves and our exploration program may not yield oil in commercial quantities or quality, or at all.

        We have no proved reserves. We have drilled one exploratory well which had non-commercial results. We have identified leads based on seismic and geological information that indicates the potential presence of oil. However, the areas we decide to drill may not yield oil in commercial quantities or quality, or at all. Even when properly used and interpreted, 2D and 3D seismic data and visualization techniques are only tools used to assist geoscientists in identifying subsurface structures and hydrocarbon indicators and do not enable the interpreter to know whether hydrocarbons are, in fact, present in those structures. Accordingly, we do not know if any of our prospects will contain oil in sufficient quantities or quality to recover drilling and completion costs or to be economically viable. Even if oil is found in commercial quantities, construction costs of oil pipelines or floating production systems, as applicable, and transportation costs may prevent such leads from being economically viable. If our exploration efforts do not prove to be successful, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

        Offshore Guinea, the area of all of our exploration, appraisal and development efforts, has not yet proved to be an economically viable production area. We know of only one exploration well drilled in the area of our Concession, a dry hole in 1977, prior to the recent drilling of our Sabu-1 well. The Sabu-1 well encountered oil shows while drilling the targeted Upper Cretaceous section and our well-log interpretations indicated the presence of residual oil in non-commercial quantities. Subsequent analysis of rock samples from the well has confirmed the presence of hydrocarbons in fluid inclusions in the rock. Although there have been significant technological advancements in geophysical and petroleum science since 1977, and we have acquired significant 2D and 3D seismic data, exploration activities are subject to a high degree of risk, and there is no assurance of a commercially successful discovery or production in this region.

10


Table of Contents

We will need additional funding to drill additional exploratory wells, and such funding, if available, may not be on terms advantageous to us.

        Our ability to drill additional wells will depend on obtaining additional cash resources through sales of additional interests in the Concession, equity or debt financings, or through other means. If we sell additional interests in the Concession, our percentage ownership interest will decrease. The terms of any capital raising arrangements may not be advantageous for us.

Our efforts to attract commercial partners may not be successful and any arrangements made may not be advantageous to us.

        In April 2012, we announced the engagement of Bank of America Merrill Lynch as an investment advisor to assist us in connection with the potential sale of an interest in the Concession. We seek to sell, or "farm-out," a 40% interest in the Concession to an experienced oil and gas company that would also serve as operator of the project going forward. Government of the Republic of Guinea approval will be sought for the formal transfer of a portion of our concession interest to a new party. The farm-out process is expected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2012. We may not be successful in attracting a commercial partner, or the commercial partner may not have the capital and operational resources, operations experience or familiarity with areas near or similar to the Concession, or other attributes that are deemed desirable by us. If we enter into an arrangement, the terms may not be advantageous to us. Any such arrangement will likely involve the transfer of a negotiated interest in the Concession, which could reduce the potential profitability of our interest in the Concession. Because it is likely that we will provide for the new entity to become the operator, our ability to control and manage operations in the Concession will be diminished

The PSC is subject to renegotiation under certain conditions, which may have an adverse impact upon our operations and profitability.

        The PSC provides that should the Guinea government note material differences between provisions of the PSC and international standards or the Guinea Petroleum Code, the parties will renegotiate the relevant articles of the PSC. If the Guinea government identifies material differences between the PSC's provisions and international standards or the Guinea Petroleum Code, there is no assurance that we will be able to negotiate an acceptable modification to the PSC. If the parties are not successful in renegotiating the relevant articles of the PSC, the parties may be required to submit the matter to international arbitration. There is no assurance that any arbitration would be successful or otherwise lead to articles that are more favorable to us than the present articles. Therefore, the results of such negotiations or arbitration could be unfavorable to us and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operation and future cash flows.

We are highly dependent on our management team and consultants, and any failure to retain the services of such parties could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage our operations or successfully execute our business plan.

        Our business is dependent on retaining the services of a small number of key personnel of the appropriate caliber as the business develops. Our success is, and will continue to be to a significant extent, dependent upon the expertise and experience of the directors, senior management and certain key geoscientists, geologists, engineers and other professionals we engage. While we have entered into contractual arrangements with the aim of securing the services of the key management team, the retention of their services cannot be guaranteed. The loss of key members of our management team or other highly qualified technical professionals could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage our overall operations or successfully execute current or future business strategies. If any member of management or director were to leave our company, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or growth prospects.

11


Table of Contents

We have claims and lawsuits against us that may result in adverse outcomes.

        We are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits concerning shareholder claims and other matters. Adverse outcomes in some or all of these claims may result in significant monetary damages or limit our ability to engage in our business activities. While we have director and officer insurance, it may not apply to or fully cover any liabilities we incur as a result of these lawsuits. Although management currently believes resolving all of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial statements, the litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and management's view of these matters may change in the future. A material adverse impact on our financial statements also could occur for any period it was determined that an unfavorable final outcome is probable and reasonably estimable.

An inability to resolve the legal dispute associated with the cost of drilling the Sabu-1 well could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and liquidity.

        Our wholly-owned subsidiary, SCS, has a pending lawsuit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address the cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well. Although management believes this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, the litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and management's view of these matters may change in the future. To date, AGR has not yet filed its defense in this matter; however, we expect AGR to deny liability and to file a counterclaim against SCS. Also, AGR has made claims for additional cost of $8.5 million on a gross basis or $6.5 million based on our 77% share, which we dispute and have not included in our cost recorded to date. Resolution of this dispute may result in the recovery by us of a portion of the costs incurred to date, but an adverse outcome in this dispute may result in significant additional liability and may negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and liquidity.

Drilling wells is speculative and potentially hazardous. Actual costs may be more than our estimates, and may not result in any discoveries. The cost of our recently drilled exploratory well was significantly higher than expected.

        Exploring for and developing oil reserves involves a high degree of operational and financial risk, which precludes definitive statements as to the time required and costs involved in reaching certain objectives. The budgeted costs of drilling, completing and operating wells are often exceeded. The cost of our recently drilled exploratory well, the Sabu-1, was higher than we initially expected, primarily due to numerous delays and issues related to mechanical and operational matters on the rig, logistical delays resulting from limited port facilities in Guinea, and an expanded well logging program. In addition, oil was not discovered in commercial quantities. Based on the drilling outcome and accounting rules, we evaluated certain geological and geophysical related costs in unproved properties along with the drilling costs of the Sabu-1 well and moved $116.3 million to proved properties and fully amortized the $116.3 million in proved properties on our Statements of Operations for the year ended June 30, 2012. Unexpected delays and increases in costs associated with wells drilled in the future, could adversely affect our results of operation, financial position, liquidity and business plans.

        Drilling may be unsuccessful for many reasons, including geological conditions, weather, cost overruns, equipment shortages and mechanical difficulties. Exploratory wells bear a much greater risk of loss than development wells. The successful drilling of an oil well may not be indicative of the potential for the development of a commercially viable field and will not necessarily result in a profit on investment. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomic or only marginally economic.

        There are a variety of operating risks, including:

    blowouts, cratering and explosions;

12


Table of Contents

    mechanical and equipment problems;

    uncontrolled flows of oil and gas or well fluids;

    fires;

    marine hazards with respect to offshore operations;

    formations with abnormal pressures;

    pollution and other environmental risks; and

    weather conditions and natural disasters.

        Offshore operations are subject to a variety of operating risks particular to the marine environment, such as capsizing and collisions. Also, offshore operations are subject to damage or loss from adverse weather conditions. Any of these events could result in loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of our operations and substantial losses.

        Deepwater drilling generally requires more time and more advanced drilling technologies than exploration in shallower waters, involving a higher risk of equipment failure and usually higher drilling costs. In addition, there may be production risks of which we are currently unaware. If we participate in the development of new subsea infrastructure and use floating production systems to transport oil from producing wells, these operations may require substantial time for installation or encounter mechanical difficulties and equipment failures that could result in significant liabilities, cost overruns or delays. Furthermore, deepwater operations generally, and operations in West Africa in particular, lack the physical oilfield service infrastructure present in other regions. As a result, a significant amount of time may elapse between a deepwater discovery and the marketing of the associated oil and natural gas, increasing both the financial and operational risks involved with these operations. Because of the lack and high cost of this infrastructure, further discoveries we may make in Guinea may never be economically producible.

We may not be able to meet our substantial capital requirements to conduct our operations or achieve our business plan.

        Our business is capital intensive, and we must invest a significant amount in our activities. We intend to make substantial capital expenditures to find, develop and produce natural gas and oil reserves.

        Additional capital could be obtained from a combination of funding sources. The current potential funding sources, and the potential adverse effects attributable thereto, include:

    offerings of equity, equity-linked and convertible debt securities, which would dilute the equity interests of our stockholders;

    sales or assignments of interests in the Concession and exploration program, which would reduce any future revenues from that program while at the same time offsetting potential expenditures;

    debt and convertible debt offerings, which would increase our leverage and add to our need for cash to service such debt and which could result in assets being pledged as collateral; and

    borrowings from financial institutions, which may subject us to certain restrictive covenants, including covenants restricting our ability to raise additional capital or pay dividends.

        It is difficult to quantify the amount of financing we may need to fund our business plan in the longer term. The amount of funding we may need in the future depends on various factors such as:

    our financial position;

13


Table of Contents

    the cost of exploration and drilling;

    the prevailing market price of natural gas and oil; and

    the lead time required to bring any discoveries to production.

        Our ability to raise additional capital will depend on the results of operations and the status of various capital and industry markets at the time such additional capital is sought. Historically, we have been able to raise capital from equity sources to finance our activities, but there is no assurance that we will be able to do so in the future or on acceptable terms, if at all. Further, we currently have no operating revenue. While we believe we have sufficient resources to fund the remaining Sabu-1 well drilling costs, to complete the processing of the most recent 3D seismic survey and working capital for at least the next 12 months, additional capital will likely be required beyond this period. If we do not obtain capital resources in the future, we may not be able to meet the obligations under the PSC and thereby could be required to surrender the Concession. The Concession is our single most important asset and, although we are considering other opportunities, the loss of the Concession would significantly reduce our ability to eventually become a profit-generating company.

        We may continue to incur significant expenses over the next several years with our operations, including further 3D seismic studies and exploratory drilling. We may not be able to raise or expend the capital necessary to undertake or complete future drilling programs or acquisition opportunities unless we raise additional funds through debt or equity financings, which may not be available on acceptable terms to us or at all. We may not be able to obtain debt or equity financing or enter into and complete additional strategic relationships with an industry partner to meet our capital requirements on acceptable terms, if at all. Further, our future cash flow from operations may not be sufficient for continued exploration, development or acquisition activities, and we may not be able to obtain the necessary funds from other sources.

We have no ability to control the prices that we may receive for oil or gas. Oil and gas prices are volatile, and a substantial or extended decline in prices could adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain financing and future operating results.

        We currently have no source of revenue. Our financial condition is based solely on our ability to sell equity or debt securities to investors, enter into an additional joint operating or similar strategic relationship with an industry partner, sell interests related to the Concession or borrow funds. We expect that entering into these joint operating or similar relationships would entail transferring a portion of our interest in the Concession to such partner. Such investors would consider the price of oil and gas in making an investment decision. Declines in oil and gas prices may adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain financing and operating results. Low oil and gas prices also may reduce the amount of oil and gas that we could produce economically. Low oil and gas prices in the future could have a negative effect on our future financial results. Historically, oil and gas prices and markets have been volatile, with prices fluctuating widely, and they are likely to continue to be volatile. Prices for oil and gas are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factors include:

    the level of domestic and foreign supplies of oil;

    the level of consumer product demand;

    weather conditions and natural disasters;

    political conditions in oil producing regions throughout the world;

14


Table of Contents

    the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil production;

    speculation as to the future price of oil and natural gas and the speculative trading of oil and natural gas futures contracts;

    price and production controls;

    political and economic conditions, including embargoes in oil-producing countries or affecting other oil-producing activities, particularly in the Middle East, Africa, Russia and South America;

    continued threat of terrorism and the impact of military and other action, including U.S. military operations in the Middle East;

    the level of global oil and natural gas exploration and production activity;

    the price of foreign oil imports;

    actions of governments;

    domestic and foreign governmental regulations;

    the price, availability and acceptance of alternative fuels;

    technological advances affecting energy consumption;

    global economic conditions; and

    the value of the U.S. dollar, the Euro and fluctuations in exchange rates generally.

        These factors and the volatile nature of the energy markets make it impossible to predict oil and gas prices. Our inability to respond appropriately to changes in these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business plan, financial position, results of operations and future cash flows.

The unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and oilfield services, as well as gathering systems and processing facilities, and our dependence on industry contractors generally, could adversely impact us.

        We are dependent on industry contractors for the success of our oil and gas exploration projects. In particular, our drilling activity offshore of Guinea will require that we have access to offshore drilling rigs and contracts with experienced operators of such rigs. The availability and cost of drilling rigs and other equipment and services, and the skilled personnel required to operate those rigs and equipment is affected by the level and location of drilling activity around the world. An increase in drilling operations worldwide may reduce the availability and increase the cost to us of drilling rigs, other equipment and services, and appropriately experienced drilling contractors. The reduced availability of such equipment and services may delay our ability to discover reserves and higher costs for such equipment and services may increase our costs, both of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and future cash flow. If we succeed in constructing oil wells, we may be required to shut them because access to pipelines, gathering systems or processing facilities may be limited or unavailable. If that were to occur, we would be unable to realize revenue from those wells until arrangements were made to deliver the production to market, which could cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are exposed to the failure or non-performance of commercial counterparties.

        Our operations will be dependent on certain third parties with whom we have commercial agreements (such as drilling project management contractors, drilling contractors and the parties responsible for transporting and/or storing our production) for our future exploration, development,

15


Table of Contents

production, sales or other activities. The efficiency, timeliness and quality of contract performance by third party providers are largely beyond our direct control. If one or more of these third parties fails to meet its contractual obligations to us, or if such services are temporarily or permanently unavailable (for example, as a result of technical problems or industrial action), or not available on commercially acceptable terms, we may experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future cash flow. In addition, as a named party under the PSC, we could be held liable for the environmental, health and safety impacts arising out of the activities of our drilling project management contractor or any other third party service provider contracted by us or on our behalf, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and future cash flow.

Participants in the oil and gas industry are subject to numerous laws that can affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.

        Exploration and production activities in the oil and gas industry are subject to local laws and regulations. We may be required to make large expenditures to comply with governmental laws and regulations, particularly in respect of the following matters:

    licenses for drilling operations;

    tax increases, including retroactive claims;

    unitization of oil accumulations;

    local content requirements (including the mandatory use of local partners and vendors); and

    environmental requirements and obligations, including investigation and/or remediation activities.

        Under these and other laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injuries, property damage and other types of damages. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in the suspension or termination of our operations and subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, new laws and regulations may be enacted, and current laws and regulations could change or their interpretations could change, in ways that could substantially increase our costs. These risks may be higher in the developing countries in which we conduct our operations, where there could be a lack of clarity or lack of consistency in the application of these laws and regulations. Any resulting liabilities, penalties, suspensions or terminations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

        Furthermore, the explosion and sinking in April 2010 of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig during operations on the Macondo exploration well in the Gulf of Mexico, and the resulting oil spill, may have increased certain of the risks faced by those drilling for oil in deepwater regions, including increased industry standards, governmental regulation and enforcement, and less favorable investor perception of the risk-adjusted benefits of deepwater offshore drilling.

        The occurrence of any of these factors, or the continuation thereof, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or future results of operations.

We may not be able to commercialize our interests in any natural gas produced from our Guinea Concession.

        The development of the market for natural gas in West Africa is in its early stages. Currently there is no infrastructure to transport and process natural gas on commercial terms in Guinea, and the expenses associated with constructing such infrastructure ourselves may not be commercially viable given local prices currently paid for natural gas. Accordingly, there may be limited or no value derived from any natural gas produced from our Guinea Concession.

16


Table of Contents

Our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover losses, or we could be subject to uninsured liabilities which could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

        There are circumstances where insurance will not cover the consequences of an event, or where we may become liable for costs incurred in events or incidents against which we either cannot insure or may elect not to have insured (whether on account of prohibitive premium costs or for other commercial reasons). Further, insurance covering certain matters (such as sovereign risk, terrorism and many environmental risks) may not be available to us. Moreover, we may be subject to large excess payments in the event a third party has a valid claim against us, and therefore may not be entitled to recover the full extent of our loss, or may decide that it is not economical to seek to do so. The realization of any significant liabilities in connection with our future activities could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future cash flow.

        There are risks associated with the drilling of oil and natural gas wells which could significantly reduce our revenues or cause substantial losses, impairing our future operating results. We may become subject to liability for pollution, blow-outs or other hazards, including those arising out of the activities of our third-party contractors. We intend to obtain insurance with respect to certain of these hazards, but such insurance likely will have limitations that may prevent us from recovering the full extent of such liabilities. The payment by us of such liabilities could reduce the funds available to us or could, in an extreme case, result in a total loss of our properties and assets. Moreover, oil and natural gas production operations are also subject to all the risks typically associated with such operations, including premature decline of reservoirs and the invasion of water into producing formations.

We have competition from other companies that have larger financial and other resources than we do, which puts us at a competitive disadvantage.

        A large number of companies and individuals engage in drilling for gas and oil, and there is competition for the most desirable prospects. We are likely to face competition from international oil and gas companies, which already may have significant operations in a region, together with potential new entrants into such markets, any of which may have greater financial, technological and other resources than us. There is a high degree of competition for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have a commercial potential. We compete with other companies for the acquisition of oil and gas interests, as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and other personnel.

        There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to compete effectively with other existing oil and gas companies, or any new entrants to the industry. Any failure by us to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future cash flow.

We may incur a variety of costs to engage in future acquisitions, and the anticipated benefits of those acquisitions may never be realized.

        As a part of our business strategy, we may make acquisitions of, or significant investments in, other assets, particularly those that would allow us to produce oil and natural gas and generate revenue to fund our exploration activities. Any future acquisitions would be accompanied by risks such as:

    diversion of our management's attention from ongoing business concerns;

    our potential inability to maximize our financial and strategic position through the successful development of the asset or assets acquired;

    impairment of our relationship with our existing employees if we cannot hire employees to staff any new operations and our existing employees are required to staff both old and new operations; and

    maintenance of uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies.

17


Table of Contents

        We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully integrate any business, products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could harm our business.

We do not have reserve reports for the Concession and our expectations as to oil and gas reserves are uncertain and may vary substantially from any actual production.

        We do not have any reserve reports for the Concession. A reserve report is the estimated quantities of oil and gas based on reports prepared by third party reserve engineers. Reserve reporting is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Expectations as to oil and gas reserves are uncertain and may vary substantially from any actual production.

Risks Relating to Operating in Guinea

Geopolitical instability where we operate subjects us to political, economic and other uncertainties.

        We conduct business in Guinea, which is in a region of the world where there have been recent civil wars, revolutions, coup d'etats and internecine conflicts. There is the risk of political violence and increased social tension in Guinea as a result of the past political upheaval, and there is a risk of civil unrest, crime and labor unrest at times. For example, in September 2009, the military government intervened to stop pro-democracy rallies, resulting in a number of civilian deaths and casualties. This led to the African Union, United States and European Union imposing sanctions upon the former government. A successful mediation organized by the international community (African Union, United States and European Union) between the opposition and the military junta resulted in the appointment of a Prime Minister of Guinea from the opposition. In 2010, democratic elections were held, and a president was elected and inaugurated. While these developments indicate that the political situation in Guinea is improving, external or internal political forces potentially could create a political or military climate that might cause a change in political leadership, the outbreak of hostilities, or civil unrest. Such uncertainties could result in our having to cease our Guinea operations and result in the loss or delay of our rights under the PSC.

        Further, we face political and economic risks and other uncertainties with respect to our operations, which may include, among other things:

    loss of future revenue, property and equipment, as a result of hazards such as expropriation, war, acts of terrorism, insurrection and other political risks;

    increases in taxes and governmental royalties;

    unilateral renegotiation or cancellation of contracts by governmental entities;

    difficulties enforcing our rights against a governmental agency because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity and foreign sovereignty over international operations;

    changes in laws and policies governing operations of foreign-based companies; and

    currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations.

        Our operations in Guinea also may be adversely affected by laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade and taxation. Realization of any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or growth prospects.

18


Table of Contents

Guinea's political uncertainties could adversely affect our rights under the Concession or obligations under the PSC.

        Guinea has faced and continues to face political, economic and social uncertainties which are beyond our control. Maintaining a good working relationship with the Guinea government is important because the Concession is granted under the terms of the PSC, with the Guinea government. In June 2010, a democratic election was held that identified two main candidates for a run-off election that was held on November 7, 2010. On December 21, 2010, President Alpha Conde was inaugurated. The newly-elected government has replaced the transitional government. Although we believe that our management has a positive working relationship with the new Guinea government, we cannot predict future political events and changing relationships. Political instability, substantial changes in government laws, policies or officials, and attitudes of officials toward us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and future cash flow.

We operate in Guinea, a country where corrupt behavior exists that could impair our ability to do business in the future or result in significant fines or penalties.

        We operate in Guinea, a country where governmental corruption has been known to exist. There is a risk of violating either the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, laws or legislation promulgated pursuant to the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions or other applicable anti-corruption regulations that generally prohibit the making of improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. In addition, the future success of our Guinea operations may be adversely affected by risks associated with international activities, including economic and labor conditions, political instability, risk of war, expropriation, terrorism, renegotiation or modification of existing contracts, tax laws and changes in exchange rates.

We are subject to governmental regulations, the cost of compliance with which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and future cash flow.

        Oil and gas operations in Guinea will be subject to government regulation and to interruption or termination by governmental authorities on account of ecological and other considerations. It is impossible to predict future government proposals that might be enacted into law, future interpretation of existing laws or future amendments to the Guinea Petroleum Code or any other laws, or the effect those new or amended laws or changes in interpretation of existing laws might have on us. Restrictions on oil and gas activities, such as production restrictions, price controls, tax increases and pollution and environmental controls may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and future cash flows.

Political, social and economic conditions in Guinea may adversely affect our business, results of operation, financial condition and future cash flow.

        As all of our potential revenue generating assets are currently located in Guinea, our operations are dependent on the economic and political conditions prevailing in Guinea. Accordingly, we are subject to the risks associated with conducting business in and with a foreign country, including the risks of changes in the country's laws and policies (including those relating to taxation, royalties, acquisitions, disposals, imports and exports, currency, environmental protection, management of natural resources, exploration and development of mines, labor and safety standards, and historical and cultural preservation). The costs associated with compliance with these laws and regulations are substantial, and possible future laws and regulations as well as changes to existing laws and regulations could impose additional costs on us, require us to incur additional capital expenditures and/or impose restrictions on or suspensions of our operations and delays in the development of our assets.

19


Table of Contents

        Further, these laws and regulations may allow government authorities and private parties to bring legal claims based on damages to property and injury to persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of our past and current operations and could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, penalties or other civil or criminal sanctions. If material, these compliance costs, claims or fines could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or growth prospects.

        In addition, Guinea has high levels of unemployment, poverty and crime. These problems have, in part, hindered investments in Guinea, prompted emigration of skilled workers and affected economic growth negatively. While it is difficult to predict the effect of these problems on businesses operating in Guinea or the Guinea government's efforts to solve them, these problems, or the solutions proposed, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or growth prospects.

The legal and judicial system in Guinea is relatively undeveloped and subject to frequent changes, and we may be exposed to similar risks if we operate in certain other jurisdictions.

        Guinea has a less developed legal and judicial system than more established economies which could result in risks such as: (i) effective legal redress in the courts of such jurisdictions, whether in respect of a breach of contract, law or regulation, or in an ownership dispute, being more difficult to obtain; (ii) a higher degree of discretion on the part of Governmental authorities who may be susceptible to corruption; (iii) the lack of judicial or administrative guidance on interpreting applicable rules and regulations; (iv) inconsistencies or conflicts between and within various laws, regulations, decrees, orders and resolutions; or (v) relative inexperience of the judiciary and courts in such matters. In Guinea and certain other jurisdictions, the commitment of local business people, government officials and agencies and the judicial system to abide by legal requirements and negotiated agreements may be more uncertain, creating particular concerns with respect to the Concession or other licenses, permits or approvals required by us for the operation of our business, which may be susceptible to revision or cancellation, and legal redress may be uncertain or delayed. There can be no assurance that joint ventures, licenses, license applications or other legal arrangements will not be adversely affected by the actions of government authorities or others, and the effectiveness of and enforcement of such arrangements in these jurisdictions cannot be assured.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock historically has been volatile. This volatility may affect the price at which you could sell your common stock, and the sale of substantial amounts of our common stock could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

        The closing price for our common stock has varied between a high of $5.58 on July 26, 2011 and a low of $0.59 on May 14, 2012 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. On September 6, 2012, the closing price of our common stock was $0.75. This volatility may affect the price at which an investor could sell the common stock, and the sale of substantial amounts of our common stock could adversely affect the price of our common stock. Our stock price is likely to continue to be volatile and subject to significant price and volume fluctuations in response to market and other factors, including the other factors discussed in "—Risks Relating to Our Business and the Industry in Which We Operate"; variations in our quarterly operating results from our expectations or those of securities analysts or investors; downward revisions in securities analysts' estimates; and announcement by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments.

20


Table of Contents

We received a continued listing standards notice from the New York Stock Exchange and may be delisted if we do not regain compliance within the six months following the receipt of the notification.

        Our common stock has traded recently below $1.00 per share. As a result, we received a continued listing standards notice from the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") on May 14, 2012. Under NYSE rules, such notices may be issued when the average closing price of a company's common stock is less than $1.00 per share over a period of 30 consecutive trading days. We will have six months following receipt of the notification to regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement. We can regain compliance at any time during the six-month cure period if our common stock has a closing share price of at least $1.00 on the last trading day of any calendar month during the period and also has an average closing share price of at least $1.00 over the 30 trading-day period ending on the last trading day of that month or on the last day of the cure period. The NYSE rules also provide that, if we choose to take an action to cure the price condition that requires shareholder approval, we must inform the NYSE, obtain such shareholder approval by no later than our next annual meeting, and implement the action promptly thereafter.

We may issue additional shares of common stock in the future, which could adversely affect the market price of our shares and cause dilution to existing stockholders.

        We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future which could adversely affect the market price of our shares. Significant sales of shares of our common stock by major stockholders, or the public perception that an offering or sale may occur also could have an adverse effect on the market price of shares of our common stock. Issuance of additional shares of common stock will dilute the percentage ownership interest of the existing stockholders, and may dilute the book value per share of our shares of common stock held by existing stockholders.

Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market could harm the market price of the shares of common stock.

        The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock (including shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares) may cause substantial fluctuations in the price of shares of our common stock. Because investors may be more reluctant to purchase shares of our common stock following substantial sales or issuances, the sale of shares in an offering could impair our ability to raise capital in the near term.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal controls for the year ended June 30, 2012, and if we fail to adequately remediate, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results in the future and the market price of our shares may be adversely affected.

        We and our independent registered public accounting firm, in connection with the audit of our internal control over financial reporting, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, have identified a control deficiency resulting from the lack of effective detective and monitoring controls being designed within internal control over financial reporting. This deficiency related to oversight and review of financial information in the area of income taxes. We plan to take measures to remedy this weakness in internal controls. A failure to address any control deficiency could result in inaccuracies in our financial statements and could also impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements. As a result, our business and the market price of our shares may be adversely affected.

Delaware law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover, which could adversely impact the market price of our shares.

        We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change in control would

21


Table of Contents

be beneficial to our existing stockholders. Certain provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us or discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer for our common stock, which, under certain circumstances, could reduce the market price of our common stock.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

Item 2.    Properties

        Information on Oil and Gas Properties is included in Item 1. Business above in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        Our executive and administrative offices are located at 12012 Wickchester Lane, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77079 where we lease 14,673 square feet of space pursuant to a lease agreement with a 60 month term.

        The lease agreement is for 60 months beginning on March 1, 2010, the date we took possession of the property. We are obligated to make the following base rental payments: (i) $0.00 per month during months 1 - 9; (ii) $17,472 per month during months 10 - 12; (iii) $17,957 per month during months 13 - 24; (iv) $19,413 per month during months 25 - 36; (v) $21,354 per month during months 37 - 48; and (vi) $24,266 per month during months 49 - 60.

        During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the lease was amended to include additional square footage. Under the amended lease agreement, we are obligated to make the following additional rental payments: (i) $4,537.50 per month from the date the expansion is complete through January 31, 2012; (ii) $4,663.54 per month from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013; (iii) $4,789.58 per month from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014; and (iv) $4,915.63 per month from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016. We completed the expansion and began making lease payments during the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

        In addition to the base rent, we are also responsible for the pro-rata share (10.664%) of excess operating expenses in connection with the property which amounted to $9,800 for fiscal year 2012. We also paid a security deposit of $50,000 at the time of execution of the lease agreement of which $35,000 was refunded based on the lease agreement during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

        From time to time, we and our subsidiaries are involved in business disputes. We are unable to predict the outcome of such matters when they arise. Currently pending proceedings, in our opinion, will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial statements. The following is a description of certain disputes involving us.

Shareholder Lawsuits

        On April 2, 2012, a lawsuit styled as a class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas against us and our chief executive officer alleging that we made false and misleading statements that artificially inflated our stock prices. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that we misrepresented the prospects and progress of our drilling operations, including our drilling of the Sabu-1 well and plans to drill the Baraka-1 well off the coast of the Republic of Guinea. The lawsuit seeks damages based on Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, although the specific amount of damages is not specified. On June 1 and June 4, 2012, a number of parties made application to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff for this action, but a lead plaintiff has

22


Table of Contents

not yet been selected by the Court. We anticipate a consolidated amended complaint will be filed in the matter once a lead plaintiff is appointed.

        On April 5, 2012, a purported derivative action was filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, against all of our directors. The petition alleges that the directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with positive statements about our drilling operations and the Guinea Concession and disclosures related to material weaknesses that we identified in our financial controls. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages against our directors including restitution and disgorgement of profits and advances based on asserted causes of action for breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. On July 12, 2012, we and our directors filed special exceptions to the derivative lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiff failed to plead demand futility. The plaintiff did not make a demand on the Hyperdynamics Board prior to filing the derivative suit; therefore the lawsuit would be subject to dismissal unless the plaintiffs' pleadings sufficiently demonstrated that demand would be futile. In response, the plaintiff amended his petition on August 13, 2012.

Iroquois Lawsuit

        On May 9, 2012, a lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against us and all of our directors. The plaintiffs, five hedge funds that invested in us in early 2012, allege that we breached an agreement with the plaintiffs, and that we and the directors made certain negligent misrepresentations relating to the company's drilling operations. Among other claims, the plaintiffs allege that we misrepresented the status of our drilling operations and the speed with which the drilling would be completed. The plaintiffs advance claims for breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation and seek damages in the amount of $18.5 million plus pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs also seek indemnity for their legal expense. On July 12, 2012, we and the directors moved to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim as to all defendants and for lack of personal jurisdiction over the director defendants. The parties are currently briefing the motion.

AGR Lawsuit

        On June 21, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, SCS, filed suit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address the cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well drilled off the coast of the Republic of Guinea. The suit was filed in London, England in the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court. SCS is seeking to recover damages and other relief from AGR for claims of mismanagement of the drilling of the Sabu-1 well and various breaches of contract that resulted in the cost overruns. Among other things, the lawsuit alleges that AGR mismanaged the selection, reconditioning and crew staffing for the Jasper Explorer drilling rig used to drill the Sabu-1 well, mismanaged other subcontractor relationships, failed to seek cost relief from its subcontractors, and failed to return to SCS inventory purchased by SCS but not used in the drilling of Sabu-1 well. AGR has not yet filed its defense in that matter, but has indicated it expects to file a counterclaim.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

        None.

23


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Price Range of Common Stock

        Shares of our common stock, for the periods presented below, were traded on the NYSE. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices per share for our common stock, as reported by the NYSE.

 
  High   Low  

Fiscal 2012:

             

Fourth Quarter

  $ 1.30   $ 0.59  

Third Quarter

    3.43     1.18  

Second Quarter

    5.39     2.04  

First Quarter

    5.58     3.24  

Fiscal 2011:

             

Fourth Quarter

  $ 4.75   $ 3.18  

Third Quarter

    7.40     3.91  

Second Quarter

    5.21     2.26  

First Quarter

    2.49     0.99  

        On September 6, 2012, the last price for our common stock as reported by the NYSE was $0.75 per share and there were approximately 180 stockholders of record of the common stock.

Dividends

        We have not paid, and we do not currently intend to pay in the foreseeable future, cash dividends on our common stock. The current policy of our Board of Directors is to retain all earnings, if any, to provide funds for operation and expansion of our business. The declaration of dividends, if any, will be subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, which may consider such factors as our results of operations, financial condition, capital needs and acquisition strategy, among others.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table gives aggregate information under all equity compensation plans of Hyperdynamics as of June 30, 2012.


Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category
  Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(A)
 
 
  A
  B
  C
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

    12,495,316   $ 2.09     2,044,019  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

    N/A     N/A     N/A  
               

Total

    12,495,316   $ 2.09     2,044,019  
               

24


Table of Contents

        The Stock and Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan") of Hyperdynamics was adopted May 7, 1997 and amended on December 3, 2001, on January 21, 2005, and on February 20, 2008. The total number of shares authorized under the Plan, as amended, was 14,000,000. The Board terminated the 1997 Plan effective upon stockholder approval of the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan").

        Our 2008 Restricted Stock Award Plan (the "2008 Plan") was adopted on February 20, 2008. The total number of shares authorized under the 2008 Plan was 3,000,000. The Board terminated the 2008 Plan effective upon stockholder approval of the 2010 Plan.

        On February 18, 2010, at our annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders approved the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan was amended to increase issuable shares from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 on February 17, 2012.

        The 2010 Plan provides for the grants of shares of common stock, restricted stock units or incentive stock options and/or nonqualified stock options to purchase our common stock to selected employees, directors, officers, agents, consultants, attorneys, vendors and advisors. Shares of common stock, options, or restricted stock can only be granted under the Plan within 10 years from the effective date of February 18, 2010. A maximum of 10,000,000 shares are issuable under the 2010 Plan.

        The purpose of the Plan is to further our interest, and the interest of our subsidiaries and our stockholders by providing incentives in the form of stock or stock options to key employees, consultants, directors, and vendors who contribute materially to our success and profitability. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel as employees, independent consultants, and directors. The issuance of stock and grants of options will recognize and reward outstanding individual performances and contributions and will give such persons a proprietary interest in us, thus enhancing their personal interest in our continued success and progress. We pay wages, salaries, and consulting rates that we believe are competitive. We use the 2010 Plan to augment our compensation packages.

        The following table provides a reconciliation of the securities remaining available for issuance as of June 30, 2012 under the 2010 Plan:

 
  2010 Plan  

Shares available for issuance, June 30, 2011

    1,069,480  

Increase in shares available for issuance

    5,000,000  

Stock options granted

    (4,273,461 )

Previously issued options cancelled or expired

    248,000  
       

Shares available for issuance, June 30, 2012

    2,044,019  
       

25


Table of Contents

Stock Performance Chart

        The following chart compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative stockholder return on our common stock from July 1, 2007 to the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 with the cumulative total return on the (i) NYSE ARCA Oil & Gas Index and (ii) Russell 2000. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on July 1, 2007 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.

Performance Graph

GRAPHIC

        In accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, the above stock performance chart shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC or subject to Regulations 14A or 14C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

26


Table of Contents


Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

 
  Year ended June 30,  
(In thousands, except earnings per share data)
  2012   2011   2010   2009   2008  

Revenue

  $   $   $   $   $  

Full amortization of proved oil and gas properties(1)

  $ (116,312 ) $   $   $   $  

Loss from operations

  $ (149,201 ) $ (10,869 ) $ (8,048 ) $ (6,083 ) $ (7,971 )

Net loss

  $ (149,313 ) $ (11,238 ) $ (8,009 ) $ (8,883 ) $ (9,505 )

Basic loss per common share

  $ (0.93 ) $ (0.09 ) $ (0.09 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.17 )

Diluted loss per common share

  $ (0.93 ) $ (0.09 ) $ (0.09 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.17 )

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

    160,687     125,998     85,914     61,845     56,331  

Cash

 
$

37,148
 
$

79,889
 
$

26,040
 
$

1,360
 
$

1,480
 

Oil and Gas Properties

  $ 39,278   $ 36,200   $ 92   $ 7,663   $ 7,314  

Total Assets

  $ 102,796   $ 192,683   $ 27,220   $ 9,440   $ 12,950  

Long-Term Liabilities

  $ 125   $ 138   $ 653   $ 1,735   $ 2,019  

Shareholder's Equity

  $ 76,067   $ 189,429   $ 21,526   $ 2,669   $ 6,673  

(1)
During the year ended June 30, 2012 we completed the drilling of the Sabu-1 well, our first exploratory well in our Guinea Concession, which was non-commercial. As a result, we evaluated certain geological and geophysical related costs in unproved properties along with the drilling costs of the Sabu-1 well and moved $116,312,000 to proved properties. Since we have no proved reserves to include in the Full-Cost Ceiling Test, the entire $116,312,000 resulted in the full amortization of our proved oil and gas properties.

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

        Our corporate mission is to provide energy for the future by exploring for, developing new, and re-establishing pre-existing sources of energy. We are currently exploring for oil and gas offshore Guinea, which will be our primary focus for the remainder of calendar year 2012. We intend to continue acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties. At this time, we have no source of operating revenue and there is no assurance when we will, if ever. We have no operating cash flows and require substantial additional funds, through additional participants, securities offerings, or through other means, to fulfill our long-term business plans.

        Our operating plan within the next 12 months includes the following:

    Evaluating the data from the Sabu-1 exploratory well drilled in our Concession offshore Guinea during fiscal 2012.

    Process and interpret the most recent 3D seismic survey covering approximately 4,000 square kilometers on our Contract Area. The new deep water survey acquired during fiscal 2012 is adjacent to our Survey A, where we acquired our initial 3,635 square kilometer 3D seismic survey in 2010. The most recent 3D survey allows us to study Upper Cretaceous submarine fan structures along the Transform Margin trend of Guinea in Northwest Africa.

    We seek to sell, or farm-out, a 40% interest in the Concession to an experienced oil and gas company that would also serve as operator of the project going forward. The farm-out process is expected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2012.

27


Table of Contents

Analysis of changes in financial position

        Our current assets decreased by $94,093,000 from $136,816,000 on June 30, 2011 to $42,723,000 on June 30, 2012. The decrease in current assets is due to our fiscal 2012 capital expenditures, which lead to a decrease in cash from $79,889,000 at June 30, 2011, to $37,148,000 at June 30, 2012, and a decrease in short term investments from $55,368,000 at June 30, 2011 to zero at June 30, 2012.

        Our long-term assets increased $4,206,000, from $55,867,000 on June 30, 2011, to $60,073,000 on June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily due to our drilling activity related to the Sabu-1 exploratory well and our 4,000 square kilometer 3D seismic acquisition and processing, partially offset by our Full-Cost Ceiling Test amortization of $116,312,000 million resulting from the non-commercial drilling outcome, as required by Full-Cost Accounting rules. Additionally, the increase can be attributed to an increase in long term restricted cash from $18,300,000 at June 30, 2011 to $19,180,000 at June 30, 2012. Restricted cash as of June 30, 2011 and 2012 consists of cash held in escrow relating to our drilling contract with AGR. Under the terms of the drilling contract, we funded the escrow account for the sole purpose of funding our drilling project as overseen by AGR.

        Our current liabilities increased $23,488,000, from $3,116,000 on June 30, 2011 to $26,604,000 on June 30, 2012. Accounts payable at June 30, 2011, included amounts payable related primarily to our investments in our Concession and corporate activities, whereas accounts payable at June 30, 2012 includes costs associated with the drilling of our first well as well as seismic processing. Additionally, the increase in current liabilities can be attributed in part to an increase in accrued employee bonus expense resulting from the timing of bonus payments and increase in staff.

        Our long-term liabilities decreased from $138,000 at June 30, 2011, to $125,000 at June 30, 2012, due to the amortization of deferred rent during the year.

Results of Operations

        Based on the factors discussed below the net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year ended June 30, 2012, increased $138,075,000, to a net loss of $149,313,000, or $ 0.93 per share in the 2012 period from a net loss of $11,238,000, or $0.09 per share in the 2011 period, primarily relating to the amortization and write off of costs.

Reportable segments

        We have one reportable segment: our international operations in Guinea conducted through our subsidiary SCS. SCS is engaged in oil and gas exploration activities pertaining to offshore Guinea.

Results of Operations

Comparison for Fiscal Year 2012 and 2011

         Revenues.     There were no revenues for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

         Depreciation .    Depreciation increased 134%, or $474,000 due to additional depreciation associated with assets placed in service in 2012 which relate primarily to assets put in place to drill our first exploratory well. Depreciation expense was $827,000 and $353,000 in the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

         Selling, General and Administrative Expenses .    Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $22,062,000 and $10,516,000 for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. This represents an increase of 110%, or $11,546,000 from the fiscal 2011 period to the fiscal 2012 period. The increase in expense was primarily attributable to a $6,716,000 increase in employee-related costs, of which approximately $2,849,000 was non-cash stock-based compensation related to options granted to employees and others. This was driven by an increase in our full time staff from 28 employees as of July 1, 2010 to 53 employees as of June 30, 2012. The staffing increase primarily related to personnel required for our activities in Guinea and our support staff. Additionally, we incurred approximately $3,747,000 in costs with respect to several prospective oil and gas investment opportunities in the current fiscal period.

28


Table of Contents

         Amortization and Write off of Costs .    We fully amortized our proved oil and gas properties of $116,312,000. As a result of the non-commercial Sabu-1 well drilling outcome, as required by Full-Cost Accounting rules, we evaluated and moved to proved properties $116,312,000 of costs which were then fully amortized though our Full-Cost Ceiling Test. Additionally we have written off a prospective investment deposit of $10,000,000.

         Other income (expense).     Other income (expense) totaled $(112,000) and $(369,000) for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease is primarily the result of a loss on the warrant derivative liability in the prior fiscal period. In the fiscal 2011 period, we recognized a non-cash loss on the warrant derivative liability of $771,000. No such gain or loss was incurred on the warrant derivative liability in fiscal 2012 as the remaining warrants underlying the derivative were exercised during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. However, we recognized an other than temporary impairment of available for sale securities of $472,000 during fiscal 2012.

         Loss from Continuing Operations .    Primarily as a result of the full amortization of proved oil and gas properties and the write off of the prospective investment deposit discussed above, which together total $126,312,000, and the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $11,546,000 our loss from continuing operations increased by $138,075,000, from $11,238,000 in the year ended June 30, 2011 to $149,313,000 for the year ended June 30, 2012.

         Discontinued Operations.     There were no discontinued operations for the 2012 or 2011 periods.

Comparison for Fiscal Year 2011 and 2010

         Revenues .    There were no revenues for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

         Depreciation .    Depreciation increased 126%, or $197,000 due to additional depreciation associated with assets placed in service in 2011. Depreciation expense was $353,000 and $156,000 in the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

         Selling, General and Administrative Expenses .    Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $10,516,000 and $10,847,000 for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This represents a decrease of 3%, or $331,000.

         Loss from Operations .    Our loss from operations increased $2,821,000 from $8,048,000 in 2010 to $10,869,000 in 2011. During the 2010 period, we recognized a $2,955,000 gain on sale of a participation interest in unevaluated oil and gas properties resulting from the 23% participation interest in our Concession being assigned to Dana. This gain was recognized in May 2010 and represented the excess of the $19.6 million proceeds received over the amount of our investment in the Concession as of that date.

         Other income (expense).     Other income (expense) totaled $(369,000) and $(726,000) for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In 2011, we recognized a non-cash loss on the derivative liability related to the YA Global warrants of $771,000, all of which related to the exercise of warrants classified as derivative liabilities. In 2010, we recognized a non-cash gain on the derivative liability of $279,000, $327,000 of which was unrealized gain on the change in fair value of the liability and $48,000 loss which was related to the exercise of warrants classified as derivative liabilities. Interest income (expense) was $402,000 for the 2011 period, versus ($707,000) for the 2010 period. The higher interest income in 2011 was primarily attributable to the interest income on short term investments on hand during the fourth quarter. The lower interest expense in 2011 is primarily due to the early conversion of convertible debentures outstanding during the fiscal 2010 period and the expensing of the associated debt discount and we recognized a loss on extinguishment of the remaining convertible debenture balance of ($298,000), primarily attributable to the expensing of the remaining discount associated with these debentures.

29


Table of Contents

         Loss from Continuing Operations .    Based on the items discussed above, our loss from continuing operations increased by 28%, or $2,464,000, from $8,774,000 in the year ended June 30, 2010 to $11,238,000 for the year ended June 30, 2011.

         Discontinued Operations .    There were no discontinued operations for the 2011 period, while there was a gain of $765,000 for the 2010 period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Resource Considerations

        We completed drilling of our first exploration well, the Sabu-1 well in February 2012. The cost incurred on the Sabu-1 well is $125.9 million, or approximately $96.9 million for our 77% interest. The high cost of the Sabu-1 well adversely affected our cash position and liquidity.

        On February 2, 2012, we closed the sale of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 10,000,000 of our common shares in a registered direct public offering. The net proceeds to us from the offering were approximately $28,162,000. The February 2012 offering improved our cash position and liquidity, and we have adequate funds to conduct our current operations. However, our ability to drill additional wells will depend on obtaining additional resources through sales of additional interests in the Concession, equity or debt financings, or through other means. If we farm-out additional interests in the Concession, our percentage will decrease. Although we have been successful in raising capital and in entering into a key participation arrangement with Dana, we have no firm commitments for additional capital resources. The terms of any such arrangements, if made, are unknown, and may not be advantageous.

        In April 2012, we announced the engagement of Bank of America Merrill Lynch as an advisor to assist us in connection with the potential sale of an interest in the Concession. We seek to sell, or farm-out, a 40% interest in the Concession to an experienced oil and gas company that would also serve as operator of the project going forward. Several companies are reviewing data, and we expect the farm-out process to be completed by the end of calendar year 2012.

Liquidity

        On June 30, 2012, we had $37,148,000 in cash and $19,180,000 in restricted cash, which is held in escrow in connection with our drilling contract with AGR. We had $26,729,000 in liabilities, which are comprised of current liabilities of $26,604,000 and noncurrent liabilities of $125,000.

        We plan to use our existing cash to fund our portion of the remaining expenditures related to the Sabu-1 well. The cost incurred on the Sabu-1 well is $125.9 million, or $96.9 million for our 77% interest. We have paid approximately $113.6 million of the well costs on a gross basis, or approximately $87.5 million based on our current 77% interest, as of June 30, 2012. As described in Legal Proceedings, we have filed suit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address the cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well. Payment of the remaining drilling costs is pending resolution of this dispute. To date, AGR has not yet filed its defense in this matter; however, AGR has made claims for additional cost of $8.5 million on a gross basis or $6.5 million based on our 77% share which we dispute and have excluded from cost incurred to date. Resolution of this dispute may result is the recovery of a portion of the costs incurred to date, however, it is possible that the resolution of this dispute may result in additional liability associated with disputed costs.

        Additionally, we entered into an Agreement for the Supply of Marine Seismic Data with CGG Veritas. The cost for acquiring the survey, processing and other services is expected to total approximately $30.0 million gross, or $23.1 million based upon our current 77% interest in the Guinea Concession, of which, we have paid $25.8 million on a gross basis as of June 30, 2012 or $19.9 million based upon our 77% share. We plan to use our existing cash to fund these remaining expenditures.

30


Table of Contents

        After giving effect for the remaining liabilities and excess supplies associated with the Sabu-1 well and for the remaining costs associated with the 3D seismic survey, our cash would be in the range of $35 - 40 million.

        We are currently involved in various legal proceedings. We are unable to predict the outcome of such matters; however, an adverse development could have an impact on liquidity.

        Net cash used in operating activities for continuing operations for the year ended June 30, 2012 was $12,438,000 compared to $11,782,000 for the year ended June 30, 2011. Cash used in investing activities for continuing operations for the year ended June 30, 2012 was $59,135,000 compared to $108,823,000 in the year ended June 30, 2011. This decrease was primarily due to proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities in the current year as compared to the purchase of available for sale securities in the prior year. This was offset by an increase in expenditures associated with the drilling of our first well. There was net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2012 of $28,832,000 compared to $174,454,000 during the year ended June 30, 2011. We received approximately $165,999,000 in proceeds from the issuance of stock during fiscal 2011. Additionally, we received approximately $7,709,000 in proceeds from the exercise of warrants during the prior year period. This compares to the current period where we received $28,162,000 from the issuance of stock.

Contractual Commitments and Obligations

        Our subsidiary, SCS, has $350,000 remaining of a contingent note payable due to the former owners of SCS Corporation's assets. It is payable in our common stock and it is payable only if SCS has net income in any given quarter. If SCS experiences net income in a quarter, 25% of the income will be paid against the note, until the contingency is satisfied.


Disclosure of Contractual Obligations as of June 30, 2012

 
  Payments due by period ($thousands)  
Contractual Obligations
  Total   Less than
1 year
  1 - 3 years   3 - 5 years   More than
5 years
 

Installment Obligations

  $ 143   $ 143   $   $   $  

Operating Lease Obligations

    852     297     555          
                       

Total(1)

  $ 995   $ 440   $ 555   $   $  
                       

(1)
We are subject to certain commitments under the PSC as discussed in Item 1 above.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those estimates that may have a significant effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The following discussion of critical accounting policies addresses those policies that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require significant judgment and estimates. We base our estimates and judgment on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

31


Table of Contents

Oil and Gas Properties

        We account for oil and natural gas producing activities using the full cost method of accounting as prescribed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration, and development of proved oil and natural gas properties, including the costs of abandoned properties, dry holes, geophysical costs, and annual lease rentals are capitalized. All selling, general and administrative corporate costs unrelated to drilling activities are expensed as incurred. Sales or other dispositions of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recorded unless the ratio of cost to proved reserves would significantly change, or to the extent that the sale proceeds exceed our capitalized costs. Depletion of evaluated oil and natural gas properties is computed on the units of production method based on proved reserves. The net capitalized costs of proved oil and natural gas properties are subject to a full cost ceiling limitation in which the costs are not allowed to exceed their related estimated future net revenues discounted at 10%, net of tax considerations. In accordance with SEC release 33-8995, prices based on the preceding 12-months' average price based on closing prices on the first day of each month, or prices defined by existing contractual arrangements, are used in deriving future net revenues discounted at 10%, net of tax. The application of the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties generally results in higher capitalized costs and higher depreciation, depletion and amortization rates compared to the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties.

Costs Excluded

        Costs associated with unevaluated properties are excluded from the full cost pool until we have made a determination as to the existence of proved reserves. We review our unevaluated properties at the end of each quarter to determine whether the costs incurred should be transferred to the full cost pool and thereby subject to amortization.

        We assess all items classified as unevaluated property on a quarterly basis for possible impairment or reduction in value. We assess properties on an individual basis or as a group if properties are individually insignificant. The assessment includes consideration of the following factors, among others: intent to drill; remaining lease term; geological and geophysical evaluations; drilling results and activity; the assignment of proved reserves; and the economic viability of development if proved reserves are assigned. We assess our unevaluated properties on a country-by-country basis. During any period in which these factors indicate an impairment, the cumulative drilling costs incurred to date for such property and all or a portion of the associated leasehold costs are transferred to the full cost pool and are then subject to amortization. However, if proved reserves have not yet been established in a full cost pool, these costs are charged against earnings. For international operations where a reserve base has not yet been established, an impairment requiring a charge to earnings may be indicated through evaluation of drilling results, relinquishing drilling rights or other information. At June, 30, 2012, we had $39,278,000 of capitalized costs associated with our Guinea operations, which is net of $116,312,000 in current period amortization as a result of moving costs incurred on previously unevaluated properties to proved properties during the period.

Environmental Obligations and Other Contingencies

        Management makes judgments and estimates in accordance with applicable accounting rules when it establishes reserves for environmental remediation, litigation and other contingent matters. Provisions for such matters are charged to expense when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and reasonable estimates of the liability can be made. Estimates of environmental liabilities are based on a variety of matters, including, but not limited to, the stage of investigation, the stage of the remedial design, evaluation of existing remediation technologies, and presently enacted laws and regulations. In future periods, a number of factors could significantly change our estimate of environmental

32


Table of Contents

remediation costs, such as changes in laws and regulations, or changes in their interpretation or administration, revisions to the remedial design, unanticipated construction problems, identification of additional areas or volumes of contaminated soil and groundwater, and changes in costs of labor, equipment and technology. Consequently, it is not possible for management to reliably estimate the amount and timing of all future expenditures related to environmental or other contingent matters and actual costs may vary significantly from our estimates.

Fair Value of our debt and equity transactions

        Many of our various debt and equity transactions require us to determine the fair value of a debt or equity instrument in order to properly record the transaction in our financial statements. Fair value is generally determined by applying widely acceptable valuation models, (e.g., the Black Scholes and binomial lattice valuation models) using the trading price of the underlying instrument or by comparison to instruments with comparable maturities and terms.

Share-Based Compensation

        We follow ASC 718 which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively the vesting period). ASC 718 also requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award. We account for non-employee share-based awards based upon the provisions of ASC 505-50, "Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees."

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        Our functional currency is the US dollar. We have some foreign currency exchange rate risk resulting from our in-country offices in Guinea and the United Kingdom. US dollars are accepted in Guinea and many of our purchases and purchase obligations, such as our office lease in Guinea, are denominated in US dollars. However, our costs for labor, supplies, and fuel could increase if the Guinea Franc or the Pound Sterling significantly appreciates against the US dollar. We do not hedge the exposure to currency rate changes. We do not believe our exposure to market risk to be material.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        The Financial Statements and Supplementary Data information required hereunder is included in this report as set forth in the "Index to Financial Statements" on page F-1.

33


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

Index to Financial Statements

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Management on Internal control Over Financial Reporting

    F-2  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

   
F-3
 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP

   
F-5
 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—GBH CPAs, PC

   
F-6
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and 2011

   
F-7
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010

   
F-8
 

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010

   
F-9
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010

   
F-10
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   
F-12
 

Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

   
F-44
 

Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)

   
F-46
 

F-1


Table of Contents


REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

        Management of Hyperdynamics Corporation (the "Company" or "our"), including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

        Internal control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring (including internal auditing practices), and actions taken to correct deficiencies as identified.

        Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. The design of an internal control system is also based in part upon assumptions and judgments made by management about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that an internal control will be effective under all potential future conditions. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.

        Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria for internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Management's assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operating effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors.

        We have identified certain control deficiencies resulting from the lack of effective detective and monitoring controls being designed within internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies related to oversight and review of financial information in the area of income taxes. This condition manifested in adjustments to the financial statements and related disclosures, and there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements would not have been prevented or detected.

        As a result of this material weakness, we concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of June 30, 2012. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

        Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness on the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012 which is included in Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .

/s/ RAY LEONARD

Ray Leonard
Chief Executive Officer
  /s/ PAUL REINBOLT

Paul Reinbolt
Chief Financial Officer

F-2


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Hyperdynamics Corporation
Houston, Texas

        We have audited Hyperdynamics Corporation's (the "Company's") internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on that risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management's assessment identified a control deficiency related to oversight and review of financial information in the area of income taxes. This condition manifested in adjustments to the financial statements and related disclosures, and there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements would not have been prevented or detected. The noted deficiency represents a material weakness in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.

F-3


Table of Contents

This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2012 of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such financial statements.

        In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness identified above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

        We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2012, of the Company and our report dated September 12, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Houston, Texas
September 12, 2012

F-4


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Hyperdynamics Corporation
Houston, Texas

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hyperdynamics Corporation (the "Company") as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010 were audited by other auditors whose report, dated September 28, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hyperdynamics Corporation as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 12, 2012 expressed an adverse opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Houston, Texas
September 12, 2012

F-5


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Hyperdynamics Corporation
Houston, Texas

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting for the year ended June 30, 2010. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ GBH CPAs, PC

GBH CPAs, PC
www.gbhcpas.com
Houston, Texas

September 28, 2010

F-6


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Number of Shares and Per Share Amounts)

 
  June 30,
2012
  June 30,
2011
 

ASSETS

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 37,148   $ 79,889  

Available-for-sale securities

        55,368  

Accounts receivable—joint interest

    1,263     708  

Prepaid expenses

    753     702  

Other current assets

    3,559     149  
           

Total current assets

    42,723     136,816  

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,443 and $798

    1,584     1,336  

Oil and gas properties, using full-cost accounting:

             

Proved properties

    116,312      

Unevaluated properties excluded from amortization

    39,278     36,200  
           

    155,590     36,200  

Less-accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

    (116,312 )    
           

    39,278     36,200  

Other Assets:

             

Restricted cash

    19,180     18,300  

Deposits

    31     31  
           

Total assets

  $ 102,796   $ 192,683  
           

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

             

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  $ 26,604   $ 3,116  
           

Total current liabilities

    26,604     3,116  

Other non-current liabilities

    125     138  
           

Total liabilities

    26,729     3,254  
           

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

         

Shareholders' equity:

             

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding

         

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 350,000,000 and 250,000,000 shares authorized; 166,937,731 and 155,792,524 shares issued and outstanding, respectively          

    167     156  

Additional paid-in capital

    312,075     276,484  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

        (349 )

Accumulated deficit

    (236,175 )   (86,862 )
           

Total shareholders' equity

    76,067     189,429  
           

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 102,796   $ 192,683  
           

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Number of Shares and Per Share Amounts)

 
  Year Ended June 30,  
 
  2012   2011   2010  

Costs and expenses:

                   

Depreciation

  $ 827   $ 353   $ 156  

Selling, general and administrative

    22,062     10,516     10,847  

Full amortization of proved oil and gas properties

    116,312          

Write-off of prospective investment deposit

    10,000          
               

Total costs and expenses

    149,201     10,869     11,003  
               

Gain on sale of interest in unevaluated oil and gas properties

            2,955  
               

Loss from operations

    (149,201 )   (10,869 )   (8,048 )
               

Other income (expense):

                   

Gain (Loss) on warrant derivative liability

        (771 )   279  

Other than temporary impairment of securities

    (472 )        

Realized gain on sale of securities

    59          

Interest income (expense), net

    301     402     (707 )

Loss on settlement of debt

            (298 )
               

Total other income (expense)

    (112 )   (369 )   (726 )
               

Loss from continuing operations before income tax

    (149,313 )   (11,238 )   (8,774 )

Income tax

             

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (including gain on sale of $765 in 2010)

            765  
               

Net loss

  $ (149,313 ) $ (11,238 ) $ (8,009 )
               

Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share

                   

From continuing operations

  $ (0.93 ) $ (0.09 ) $ (0.10 )

From discontinued operations

  $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 0.01  
               

Net loss attributable to common shareholders

  $ (0.93 ) $ (0.09 ) $ (0.09 )
               

Weighted average shares outstanding—basic and diluted

    160,687,318     125,997,638     85,913,956  

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Number of Shares)

 
  Series A
Preferred
  Series B
Preferred
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
  Common Stock    
   
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   
 
 
  Additional Paid-
in Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
   
 
 
  Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Total  

Balance at July 1, 2009

    1,945   $     2,406   $     64,162,813   $ 64   $ 70,220   $ (67,615 ) $   $ 2,669  
                                           

Common stock issued for:

                                                             

Services

                    442,049         324             324  

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock

            (2,406 )       15,822,222     16     (16 )            

Conversion of debentures

                    1,949,411     2     1,294             1,296  

Cash

                    16,878,096     17     17,183             17,200  

Exercise of warrants

                    4,646,465     5     4,409             4,414  

Cashless Exercise of options

                    124,653                      

Cashless Exercise of warrants classified as a derivative

                    201,490         723             723  

Amortization of fair value of stock options

                              1,579             1,579  

Discount related to modification of convertible debt

                            1,172             1,172  

Warrant repricing charged to interest expense

                            158             158  

Warrant repricing

                                                             

Deemed dividend

                            322             322  

Deemed dividend

                            (322 )           (322 )

Net loss

                                (8,009 )       (8,009 )
                                           

Balance, June 30, 2010

    1,945   $       $     104,227,199   $ 104   $ 97,046   $ (75,624 ) $   $ 21,526  
                                           

Net loss

                                (11,238 )       (11,238 )

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on available-for-sale securities

                                    (349 )   (349 )
                                                             

Total Comprehensive Loss

                                                          (11,587 )

Common stock issued for:

                                                             

Cash

                    43,750,000     44     165,955             165,999  

Exercise of warrants

                    6,339,927     6     7,703             7,709  

Exercise of options

                    858,613     1     905             906  

Cashless exercise of warrants classified as a derivative

                    384,848     1     1,353             1,354  

Series A settlement

    (1,945 )               231,937         1,183             1,183  

Settlement charge

                            (811 )           (811 )

Amortization of fair value of stock options

                            3,150             3,150  
                                           

Balance, June 30, 2011

      $       $     155,792,524   $ 156   $ 276,484   $ (86,862 ) $ (349 ) $ 189,429  
                                           

Net loss

                                (149,313 )       (149,313 )

Reclassification of other than temporary impairments of securities included in net income

                                                    472     472  

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on available-for-sale securities

                                    (123 )   (123 )
                                                             

Total Comprehensive (Loss)

                                                          (148,964 )

Common stock issued for:

                                                             

Cash

                    10,000,000     10     28,152             28,162  

Exercise of warrants

                    340,208                      

Exercise of options

                    804,999     1     669             670  

Amortization of fair value of stock options

                            6,770             6,770  
                                           

Balance, June 30, 2012

      $       $     166,937,731   $ 167   $ 312,075   $ (236,175 ) $   $ 76,067  
                                           

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2012   2011   2010  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

                   

Net loss

  $ (149,313 ) $ (11,238 ) $ (8,009 )

Income from discontinued operations

            (765 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

                   

Depreciation

    827     353     156  

Full amortization of proved oil and gas properties

    116,312          

Write-off of prospective investment deposit

    10,000          

Common stock issued for services

            143  

Stock based compensation

    5,025     2,176     1,579  

Variable share issuance obligation

            (374 )

Loss on settlement of debt

            298  

Gain on sale of oil and gas properties

            (2,955 )

Gain (Loss) on warrant derivative liability

        771     (279 )

Interest accreted to debt principal

            342  

Repricing of warrants

            158  

(Gain) loss on disposition of assets

            32  

Amortization of discount and financing costs on debt

            144  

Amortization of premium on short term investments

    1,562          

Reclassification of other than temporary impairments of securities included in net income

    472          

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

    (123 )        

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                   

Advances to Joint Interest Partner

    (555 )   (558 )    

Accounts receivable

            (150 )

Prepaid expenses

    (51 )   (497 )   122  

Other current assets

    (3,410 )   (111 )   (58 )

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

    6,829     (2,746 )   2,714  

Other liabilities

    (13 )   68     14  
               

Cash used in operating activities—continuing operations

    (12,438 )   (11,782 )   (6,888 )

Cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations

            (76 )
               

Net cash used in operating activities

    (12,438 )   (11,782 )   (6,964 )
               

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

                   

Purchase of property and equipment

    (1,075 )   (1,025 )   (651 )

Investment in unevaluated oil and gas properties

    (100,986 )   (33,781 )   (14,041 )

Prospective investment deposit

    (10,000 )        

Increase in restricted cash

    (880 )   (18,300 )    

Proceeds from sale of interest in unevaluated oil and gas properties

            25,001  

Proceeds from sale (purchase) of short-term investments

    53,806     (55,717 )    
               

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities—continuing operations

    (59,135 )   (108,823 )   10,309  

Cash provided by investing activities—discontinued operations

            881  
               

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

    (59,135 )   (108,823 )   11,190  
               

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

                   

Proceeds from issuance of stock and warrants, net of offering costs of $1,838, $7,751 and $1,285

    28,162     165,999     17,200  

Proceeds from exercise of options

    670     906      

Proceeds from exercise of warrants

        7,709     4,414  

Payments of dividends payable—related party

            (430 )

Payments on notes payable and installment debt

        (160 )   (730 )
               

Net cash provided by financing activities

    28,832     174,454     20,454  
               

(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

    (42,741 )   53,849     24,680  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR

    79,889     26,040     1,360  
               

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

  $ 37,148   $ 79,889   $ 26,040  
               

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-10


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(In Thousands)

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2012   2011   2010  

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:

                   

Interest paid in cash

  $   $ 10   $ 69  

Income taxes paid in cash

  $   $   $  

NON-CASH INVESTING and FINANCING TRANSACTIONS

                   

Common stock issued to settle variable share obligation

   
   
   
181
 

Deemed dividend attributable to repriced warrants originally issued with purchase of common stock

            322  

Asset retirement obligation transferred as part of sale of assets

            18  

Accounts payable for oil and gas property

    16,659     1,353     434  

Note payable for prepaid insurance

            275  

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock into Common Stock

            16  

Fair value of warrant modifications

            480  

Relative fair value of warrants issued in connection with equity offerings

            3,839  

Conversion of debt, net of discount of $1,116

            1,294  

Discount of convertible debt modification

            1,172  

Exercise of warrants classified as a derivative

        1,354     723  

Reclassification of warrants as a derivative under ASC 815

            1,585  

Common stock issued for Series A settlement

        372      

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-11


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of business

        Hyperdynamics Corporation ("Hyperdynamics," the "Company," "we," and "our") is a Delaware corporation formed in March 1996. Hyperdynamics has three wholly-owned subsidiaries, SCS Corporation Ltd (SCS), a Cayman corporation, HYD Resources Corporation (HYD), a Texas corporation, and Hyperdynamics Oil & Gas Limited, incorporated in the United Kingdom. During fiscal year 2012 SCS entered into a "Corporate Continuation" from Delaware to the Cayman Islands. Through SCS and its wholly-owned subsidiary, SCS Guinea SARL (SCSG), which is a Guinea limited liability company formed under the laws of the Republic of Guinea ("Guinea") located in Conakry, Guinea, Hyperdynamics focuses on oil and gas exploration offshore the coast of West Africa. Our exploration efforts are pursuant to a Hydrocarbon Production Sharing Contract, as amended (the "PSC"). We refer to the rights granted under the PSC as the "Concession." SCS began operations in oil and gas exploration, seismic data acquisition, processing, and interpretation in late fiscal 2002. In April 2004, Hyperdynamics acquired HYD. Hyperdynamics Oil & Gas Limited was formed in February 2011 in the United Kingdom to support business development activities.

Status of our Business

        In October 2011, we commenced drilling operations on the Sabu-1 well. In February 2012, the Sabu-1 well reached the planned total depth of 3,600 meters. The cost incurred on the Sabu-1 well was $125.9 million, or $96.9 million for our 77% interest, which assumes proceeds from the sale of remaining materials on hand. We have paid approximately $113.6 million of the well costs on a gross basis, or approximately $87.5 million based on our current 77% interest, as of June 30, 2012. We determined the well to be non-commercial. As a result, we evaluated the costs associated with the well, moved these costs to proved properties and fully amortized the costs in fiscal year 2012. See additional discussion in Note 3. As described in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, we have filed suit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address the cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well. Payment of the remaining drilling costs is pending resolution of this dispute. To date, AGR has not yet filed its defense in this matter; however, AGR has made claims for additional cost of $8.5 million on a gross basis or $6.5 million based on our 77% share which we dispute and have excluded from cost incurred to date. Resolution of this dispute may result in the recovery of a portion of the costs incurred to date, however, it is possible that the resolution of this dispute may result in additional liability associated with disputed costs.

        We have conducted 2-dimensional ("2D") and 3-dimensional ("3D") surveys of a portion of the Concession. The acquisition phase of the most recent 3D seismic survey covering approximately 4,000 square kilometers in the deeper water portion of the Concession was recently completed by the CGG Veritas Ocean Endeavor. Processing of the most recent 3-D data set is in progress. Completion of this processing work is expected in early calendar year 2013.The cost for acquiring the survey, processing and other services is expected to total approximately $30.0 million gross, or $23.1 million based upon our current 77% interest in the Guinea Concession, of which, we have paid $25.8 million on a gross basis as of June 30, 2012 or $19.9 million based upon our 77% share.

        Our ability to drill additional wells will depend on obtaining additional cash resources through sales of additional interests in the concession, equity or debt financings, or through other means. We seek to sell, or farm-out, a 40% interest in the Concession to an experienced oil and gas company that

F-12


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

would also serve as operator of the project going forward. Several companies are reviewing our data, and we expect the farm-out process to be completed by the end of calendar year 2012.

        At this time, we have no source of operating revenue and there is no assurance when we will, if ever. On June 30, 2012, we had $37,148,000 in cash and $19,180,000 in restricted cash, which is held in escrow in connection with our drilling contract with AGR. We had $26,729,000 in liabilities, which are comprised of current liabilities of $26,604,000 and noncurrent liabilities of $125,000. We have no other material commitments. We plan to use our existing cash to fund these remaining drilling and seismic capital expenditures along with our general corporate needs.

        We are currently involved in various legal proceedings. We are unable to predict the outcome of such matters. These proceedings may have a negative impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations; however, currently pending proceedings, in our opinion, will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial statements. See additional discussion in Note 11.

Principles of Consolidation

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Hyperdynamics and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses at the balance sheet date and for the period then ended. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

        Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, exceed the federally insured limits. At June 30, 2012, we had approximately $35,728,000 in excess of FDIC limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Restricted cash

        Included in restricted cash as of June 30, 2012 is $19,180,000 held in escrow which relates to our drilling contract with AGR Peak Well Management Ltd ("AGR"). Under the terms of the drilling contract, we funded the escrow account for the sole purpose of funding our drilling project as overseen by AGR.

Joint interest receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

        The Company establishes provisions for losses on accounts receivable if it determines that it will not collect all or part of the outstanding balance. Accounts receivable are written down to reflect management's best estimate of realizability based upon known specific analysis, historical experience,

F-13


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

and other currently available evidence of the net collectible amount. There is no allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2012 or 2011. At June 30, 2012, all of our accounts receivable balance was related to joint interest billings to Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited ("Dana"), which owns a 23% participating interest in our Guinea Concession.

Securities classified as available-for-sale and held to maturity

        Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Marketable equity securities and debt securities not classified as held-to maturity are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses, and declines in value deemed to be other-than-temporary, are included in earnings.

        The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in earnings.

Oil and Gas Properties

Full Cost Method

        We account for oil and natural gas producing activities using the full cost method of accounting as prescribed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration, and development of proved oil and natural gas properties, including the costs of abandoned properties, dry holes, geophysical costs and annual lease rentals are capitalized. All selling, general and administrative corporate costs unrelated to drilling activities are expensed as incurred. Sales or other dispositions of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recorded unless the ratio of capitalized costs to proved reserves would significantly change, or to the extent that the sale proceeds exceed our capitalized costs. Depletion of evaluated oil and natural gas properties would be computed on the units of production method based on proved reserves. The net capitalized costs of proved oil and natural gas properties are subject to quarterly impairment tests.

Costs Excluded

        Costs associated with unevaluated properties are excluded from the full cost pool until we have made a determination as to the existence of proved reserves. We review our unevaluated properties at the end of each quarter to determine whether the costs incurred should be transferred to the full cost pool and thereby subject to amortization.

        We assess all items classified as unevaluated property on a quarterly basis for possible impairment or reduction in value. We assess properties on an individual basis or as a group if properties are individually insignificant. The assessment includes consideration of the following factors, among others: intent to drill; remaining lease term under our concession; geological and geophysical evaluations; drilling results and activity; the assignment of proved reserves; and the economic viability of development if proved reserves are assigned. We assess our unevaluated properties on a country-by-country basis. During any period in which these factors indicate an impairment, the adjustment is recorded through earnings of the period.

F-14


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Full-Cost Ceiling Test

        At the end of each quarterly reporting period, the unamortized cost of oil and natural gas properties is limited to the sum of the estimated future net revenues from proved properties (including future development and abandonment costs of wells to be drilled, using prices based on the preceding 12-months' average price based on closing prices on the first day of each month, or prices defined by existing contractual arrangements, are used in deriving future net revenues discounted at 10%) adjusted for related income tax effects ("Full-Cost Ceiling Test").

        The calculation of the Full-Cost Ceiling Test is based on estimates of proved reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting the future rates of production, timing, and plan of development. The accuracy of any reserves estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, testing, and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimates. Accordingly, reserves estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.

        During the year ended June 30, 2012 we fully amortized $116,312,000 in proved properties subject to the Full-Cost Ceiling Test. We recognized no impairment charges in the years ended June 30, 2011 or 2010, respectively.

Sales of Oil and Gas Properties and Discontinued Operations

        On April 1, 2009, management executed a contract to sell the working interest in all of its domestic oil and gas properties in a transaction that was accounted for as three sales. The liabilities associated with the working interest in the oil and gas properties, asset retirement obligations were transferred with the assets. The transaction was completed during August 2009. The Company received scheduled payments of $1,030,000 and $820,000 during May 2009. The final payment of $820,000 was received in August 2009.

        These assets, which were associated with HYD, our domestic business segment, were a disposal group and constituted a component of the entity with distinguishable cash flows. Accordingly, these assets and cash flows and results of operations associated with these assets were classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flows for 2010.

Property and Equipment, other than Oil and Gas

        Property and equipment are stated on the basis of historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three to five years.

Provision for Impairments of Long-lived Assets

        Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment loss recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. Any impairment charge is recorded through current period earnings. We recognized no impairment charges in the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 or 2010, respectively.

F-15


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Deferred Rent

        Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require rent expense to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rent holidays, rent concessions, rent escalation clauses and certain other lease provisions are recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term (including one renewal option period if renewal is reasonably assured based on the imposition of an economic penalty for failure to exercise the renewal option). The difference between the rent due under the stated lease agreement compared to that of the straight-line basis is recorded as deferred rent. The short-term portion is the portion which is scheduled to reverse within twelve months of the balance sheet date and it is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses. At the beginning of our office lease, we received a free rent period, which began in March 2010 and ended in November 2010. During the free rent period from March 2010 to November 30, 2010, we recorded $140,000 of deferred rent, which is being amortized over the term of the lease.

Income Taxes

        We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740, "Income Taxes," which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and for loss and credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided when recovery of deferred tax assets is not considered likely.

        Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. For the year ended June, 30, 2012 the Company has no unrecognized tax benefits.

        Our policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any interest or penalties in our consolidated statement of operations, nor did we have any interest or penalties accrued on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2012 and 2011 relating to unrecognized benefits.

        The tax years 2007-2011 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

Stock-Based Compensation

        ASC 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation" requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively the vesting period). We measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award. We account for non-employee share-based awards based upon ASC 505-50, "Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees."

F-16


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Earnings Per Share

        Basic loss per common share has been computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period and after any preferred stock dividend requirements. In period of earnings, diluted earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period plus weighted-average dilutive potential common shares. Diluted earnings per share calculations assume, as of the beginning of the period, exercise of stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method. Convertible securities are included in the calculation during the time period they are outstanding using the if-converted method.

        All potential dilutive securities, including potentially dilutive options, warrants and convertible securities, if any, were excluded from the computation of dilutive net loss per common share for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as their effects are antidilutive due to our net loss for those periods.

        Stock options to purchase approximately 12.5 million common shares at an average exercise price of $2.09 and warrants to purchase approximately 13.4 million shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $2.94 were outstanding at June 30, 2012. Using the treasury stock method, had we had net income, approximately 2.8 million common shares attributable to our outstanding stock options and 1.7 million common shares attributable to our outstanding warrants to purchase common shares would have been included in the fully diluted earnings per share calculation for the year ended June 30, 2012.

        Stock options to purchase approximately 9.3 million common shares at an average exercise price of $1.85 and warrants to purchase approximately 3.9 million shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $1.26 were outstanding at June 30, 2011. Using the treasury stock method, had we had net income, approximately 3.7 million common shares attributable to our outstanding stock options and 2.7 million common shares attributable to our outstanding warrants to purchase common shares would have been included in the fully diluted earnings per share calculation for the year ended June 30, 2011.

        Stock options to purchase approximately 8.0 million common shares at an average exercise price of $0.91 and warrants to purchase approximately 11.1 million common shares at an average exercise price of $1.25 were outstanding at June 30, 2010. Using the treasury stock method, had we had net income, approximately 0.9 million common shares attributable to our then outstanding stock options and 0.6 million common shares attributable to our then outstanding warrants would have been included in the fully diluted earnings per share calculation for the year ended June 30, 2010.

Contingencies

        We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and liabilities which arise in the ordinary course of business. We accrue for losses associated with legal claims when such losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted as additional information becomes available or circumstances change. Legal fees are charged to expense as they are incurred. See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information on legal proceedings.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax

        We follow the provisions of ASC 220, "Comprehensive Income", which establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income. In addition to net income (loss), comprehensive income (loss)

F-17


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

includes all changes to equity during a period, except those resulting from investments and distributions to the owners of the Company. At June 30, 2012, we had a balance in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax" on the consolidated balance sheet of zero. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss and related tax effects were as follows (in thousands):

 
  Gross
Value
  Tax
Effect
  Net of
Tax Value
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2010

  $   $   $  

Change in fair value of available-for-sale securities

    349         349  
               

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2011

  $ 349   $   $ 349  

Change in fair value of available-for-sale securities

    123         123  

Reclassification of other than temporary impairment of securities included in net income

    (472 )       (472 )
               

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2012

  $   $   $  
               

        There is no tax effect of the unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income given our full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. Total comprehensive loss was $149.0 million and $11.6 million in fiscal year 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Financial instruments

        The accounting standards (ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures") regarding fair value of financial instruments and related fair value measurements define fair value, establish a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement, and enhance disclosure requirements for fair value measures.

        The three levels are defined as follows:

    Level 1—inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

    Level 2—inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

    Level 3—inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

        Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable—joint interest and accounts payable approximate fair value. During fiscal 2012, we held investments which were classified as available-for-sale securities and therefore were recorded at their fair value at each reporting date. Available-for-sale investments, which consisted entirely of Corporate Debt securities, were valued at the closing price reported in the active market in which the security was traded. These securities were sold during the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

F-18


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities (in thousands) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011:

 
   
  Fair Value Measurement at
June 30, 2011
 
 
  Carrying
Value at
June 30, 2011
 
 
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  

Assets:

                         

Available-for-sale securities

  $ 55,368   $ 55,368   $   $  

Liabilities:

                         

Warrant derivative liability

  $   $   $   $  

        See discussion of changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities within Note 4.

        Additionally, we determined that certain warrants outstanding during the fiscal years 2011 and 2010 qualified as derivative financial instruments under the provisions of ASC 815-40, "Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in an Entity's Own Stock". These warrant agreements included provisions designed to protect holders from a decline in the stock price ('down-round' provision) by reducing the exercise price in the event we issued equity shares at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrants. As a result of this down-round provision, the exercise price of these warrants could be modified based upon a variable that is not an input to the fair value of a 'fixed-for-fixed' option as defined under ASC 815-40 and consequently, these warrants were treated as a liability and recorded at fair value at each reporting date.

        The fair value of these warrants was determined using a lattice model, with any change in fair value during the period recorded in earnings as "Other income (expense)—Gain (loss) on warrant derivative liability." As a result, the derivative warrant liability was carried on the balance sheet at its fair value.

        Significant Level 3 inputs used to calculate the fair value of the warrants included the stock price on the valuation date, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and management's assumptions regarding the likelihood of a future repricing of these warrants pursuant to the down-round provision.

        The following table sets forth the changes in the fair value measurement of our Level 3 warrant derivative liability:

Beginning balance—July 1, 2010

  $ 583  

Change in fair value of derivative liability

    771  

Warrants exercised and reclassified to additional paid-in capital

    (1,354 )
       

Balance at June 30, 2011

  $  
       

        The $771,000 change in fair value during the year ended June 30, 2011, was recorded as an increase to the derivative liability and as a non-cash loss in our statement of operations. For the year ended June 30, 2010, we incurred a $279,000 non-cash gain. All of the remaining warrants underlying this derivative liability were exercised in October 2010. At June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, there was no remaining derivative liability balance.

        As of June 30, 2012, we had no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

F-19


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Recently issued or adopted accounting pronouncements

        In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. This FASB Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") requires entities to present components of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements that would include reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. Subsequently, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 which deferred the requirements to include reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, which will be fiscal 2013 for us. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating which presentation option we will utilize for comprehensive income in our consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent Events

        The Company evaluated all subsequent events from June 30, 2012 through the date of issuance of these financial statements.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

        A summary of property and equipment as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

 
   
  June 30,  
(in thousands)
  Useful Life   2012   2011  

Computer equipment and software

    3 years   $ 1,655   $ 1,092  

Office equipment and furniture

    5 years     563     455  

Vehicles

    3 years     284     282  

Leasehold improvements

    3 years     525     305  
                 

Total Cost

          3,027     2,134  

Less—Accumulated depreciation

          (1,443 )   (798 )
                 

        $ 1,584   $ 1,336  
                 

        We review assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no impairments of property and equipment.

3. INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES

        Investment in oil and gas properties consists entirely of our Guinea concession in offshore West Africa. We own a 77% participating interest in our Guinea Concession.

F-20


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES (Continued)

Guinea Concession

        We have been conducting exploration work related to the area off the coast of Guinea since 2002. On September 22, 2006, we, acting through SCS, entered into the PSC with Guinea. Under that agreement, we were granted certain exclusive contractual rights by Guinea to explore and exploit offshore oil and gas reserves, if any, off the coast of Guinea. We are conducting our current work in Guinea under the PSC, as amended on March 25, 2010.

        The PSC Amendment clarified that we retained a Contract Area of approximately 9,650 square miles, which is approximately equivalent to 30% of the original Contract Area under the PSC, following a December 31, 2009 relinquishment of approximately 70% of the original Contract Area. The PSC Amendment requires that we relinquish an additional 25% of the retained Contract Area by September 30, 2013. Under the terms of the PSC Amendment, the first exploration period ended and the Company entered into the second exploration period on September 21, 2010. The second exploration period runs until September 2013, may be renewed to September 2016 and may be extended for one (1) additional year to allow the completion of a well in process and for two (2) additional years to allow the completion of the appraisal of any discovery made. Under the PSC Amendment, we were required to drill an exploration well, which had to be commenced by the year-end 2011, to a minimum depth of 2,500 meters below seabed. This requirement was satisfied with the drilling of the Sabu-1 well which was commenced during October of 2011 and reached the minimum depth of 2,500 meters below the seabed in February of 2012. We are required to drill an additional exploration well, which is to be commenced by the end of September 2016, to a minimum depth of 2,500 meters below seabed. The PSC Amendment requires the expenditure of $15 million on each of the exploration wells ($30 million in the aggregate). We were also required to acquire a minimum of 2,000 square kilometers of 3D seismic by September 2013 with a minimum expenditure of $12 million. This requirement was satisfied with the first 3D seismic survey acquired in 2010. Fulfillment of work obligations exempts us from expenditure obligations and exploration work in excess of minimum work obligations for each exploration period may be carried forward to the following exploration period.

        Under the PSC Amendment, Guinea may participate in development of any discovery at a participating interest of up to 15% of costs being carried for its share. The cost of that carry is to be recovered out of 62.5% of Guinea's share of cost and profit oil. The PSC Amendment removed the right of first refusal held by us covering the relinquished acreage under the original PSC. The PSC Amendment clarified that only those eligible expenditures, which were made following the date the PSC was signed, on September 22, 2006, are eligible for cost recovery. We are required to establish an annual training budget of $200,000 for the benefit of Guinea's oil industry personnel, and we are also obligated to pay an annual surface tax of $2.00 per square kilometer on our retained Concession acreage. The PSC Amendment also provides that should the Guinea government note material differences between provisions of the PSC Amendment and international standards or the Petroleum Code, the parties will renegotiate the relevant articles.

        Under the PSC and PSC Amendment our Guinea Concession is subject to a 10% royalty interest to Guinea. Of the remaining 90% of the first production, we will receive 75% of the revenue for recovery of the cost of operations, and Guinea will receive 25%.

F-21


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES (Continued)

        After recovery cost of operations, revenue will be split as outlined in the table below:

Daily production (b/d)
  Guinea
Share
  Contractor
Share
 

From 0 to 2,000

    25 %   75 %

From 2,001 to 5,000

    30 %   70 %

From 5,001 to 100,000

    41 %   59 %

Over 100,001

    60 %   40 %

        The Guinea Government may elect to take a 15% working interest in any exploitation area.

        In May 2010, the government of Guinea issued a Presidential Decree approving the PSC, as amended.

Assignment of Participating Interest

        On December 4, 2009, we entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement ("SPA") with Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited ("Dana") for Dana to acquire a 23% participating interest in the PSC. On January 28, 2010, the Company closed on the transaction with Dana assigning it a working interest in our Concession offshore Guinea. In connection with the closing of the transaction, we entered into an Assignment of Participating Interest (the "Assignment") with Dana, a Deed of Assignment and Joint Operating Agreement ("JOA"). Pursuant to the Assignment, we assigned to Dana an undivided 23% of our participating interest in the contractual interests, rights, obligations and duties under the PSC. As required by the PSC, the Deed of Assignment was delivered as the necessary notice of the Assignment to be given to the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Hydraulics of Guinea.

        As part of the obligation to bear the proportionate share of costs, the SPA required Dana to make a cash payment to us upon closing the assignment of the 23% participating interest to Dana in the amount of $ 1.7 million for Dana's pro-rata portion of accrued expenditures associated with our marine 2D seismic data acquisition program within the Contract Area. The $1.7 million payment was received by us on February 4, 2010 and was recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of our Concession.

        The Operating Agreement appoints us as the operator for purposes of conducting oil and gas exploration and production activities within the retained Contract Area. We share operating costs of joint operations with Dana in proportion to the parties' respective participating interests (Hyperdynamics, 77% and Dana, 23%). An operating committee and voting procedures are established in the JOA whereby managerial and technical representatives of the Company and Dana make decisions regarding joint operations, exploration and appraisal of commercial discoveries, and the disposition of commercial production. The JOA places restrictions upon the transfer of the parties' respective participating interests in the form of a right of first purchase that is triggered by a proposed transfer or certain changes in control of us or Dana.

        In May 2010, we received an administrative order from the Ministry of Mines and Geology of Guinea, referred to as an arrêté, confirming the Guinea government's approval of the assignment of a 23% participating interest in the PSC, as amended, to Dana. On May 20, 2010, we received a payment of $19.6 million in cash from Dana as payment for the assigned 23% participating interest in the contractual interests, rights, obligations and duties under the PSC, as amended.

F-22


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES (Continued)

Accounting for oil and gas property and equipment costs

        We follow the "full-cost" method of accounting for oil and natural gas property and equipment costs. Geological and geophysical costs incurred that are directly associated with specific unproved properties are capitalized in "Unevaluated properties excluded from amortization" and evaluated as part of the total capitalized costs associated with a prospect. The cost of unproved properties not being amortized is assessed to determine whether such properties have been impaired. In determining whether such costs should be impaired, we evaluate current drilling results and available geological and geophysical information. Any impairment assessed to unproved properties is added to the cost of proved properties. The unamortized cost of proved oil and gas properties is limited by the Full-Cost Ceiling Test.

        We exclude capitalized costs of unevaluated oil and gas properties from amortization. Geological and geophysical information pertaining to the Guinea concession was collected and evaluated and no reserves have been attributed to this concession. In February 2012, we completed the drilling of the Sabu-1 well, which was determined to be non-commercial. As a result, we evaluated certain geological and geophysical related costs in unproved properties along with the drilling costs of the Sabu-1 well and moved $116,312,000 to proved properties. Since we have no proved reserves to include in the Full-Cost Ceiling Test, the entire $116,312,000 resulted in the full amortization of our proved oil and gas properties. The net costs associated with properties which remain unevaluated were $39,278,000 and $36,200,000 as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These costs are excluded from amounts subject to amortization.

        The following table provides detail of total capitalized costs (in thousands) for our Guinea Concession as of June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 
  June 30,
2012
  June 30,
2011
 

Oil and Gas Properties:

             

Proved oil and gas Properties

  $ 116,312   $  

Unproved oil and gas Properties

    32,469     36,200  

Other Equipment Costs

    6,809      
           

Less—Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization costs

    (116,312 )    
           

Unevaluated properties not subject to amortization

  $ 39,278   $ 36,200  
           

        During the year ended June 30, 2012, we incurred $28,556,000 of geological and geophysical costs, primarily related to our 3D seismic acquisition and processing work which commenced in November 2011, and we incurred $90,834,000 of other exploration costs for our Guinea Concession during the year ended June 30, 2012, primarily related to the drilling of our first well which commenced in October 2011. Internal costs incurred that are directly identified with exploration, development, and acquisition activities undertaken by us, and which are not related to production, general corporate overhead, or similar activities, are capitalized. For the year ended June 30, 2012, we capitalized $6,613,000 of such costs.

        During the year ended June 30, 2011, we incurred $26,882,000 of geological and geophysical costs, primarily related to our 3D seismic acquisition and processing work which commenced in August 2010,

F-23


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES (Continued)

and we incurred $9,226,000 of other exploration costs for our Guinea Concession during the year ended June 30, 2011, primarily related to the purchase of long lead tangible drilling items such as wellheads and tubular items to prepare for the drilling of our first well which commenced during the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Internal costs incurred that are directly identified with exploration, development, and acquisition activities undertaken by us, and which are not related to production, general corporate overhead, or similar activities, are capitalized. For the year ended June 30, 2011, we capitalized $4,001,000 of such costs.

PGS Geophysical AS, Norway

        On June 11, 2010, we entered into an Agreement for the Supply of Marine Seismic Data ("3D Seismic Contract") with PGS Geophysical AS, Norway ("PGS"). Under the terms of the 3D Seismic Contract, PGS agreed to conduct the acquisition phase of a 3,635 square kilometer 3D seismic survey of the area that is subject to our rights, or concession, to explore and exploit offshore oil and gas reserves off the coast of Guinea. The intended purpose of the 3D seismic survey was to obtain detailed imaging of the multiple prospects which were identified from our prior 2D seismic data acquisition over the concession.

        Under the terms of the 3D Seismic Contract, PGS agreed to carry out the survey in two separate portions that commenced in August 2010. The 3D Seismic Contract was initially for $21.0 million, including mobilization and demobilization expenses. The acquisition work was completed in December 2010, with a final cost under the 3D Seismic Contract of approximately $24.7 million, including mobilization and demobilization expenses. Our share of the cost was 77% of that amount, or approximately $19.0 million.

AGR Peak Well Management Limited

        Effective November 30, 2010, we contracted with AGR to manage our exploration drilling project offshore Republic of Guinea to handle well construction project management services, logistics, tendering and contracting for materials as well as overall management responsibilities for the drilling program. On June 21, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, SCS, filed suit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address the cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well drilled off the coast of the Republic of Guinea. See additional discussion within Note 11.

CGG Veritas

        On September 20, 2011, we entered into an Agreement for the Supply of Marine Seismic Data ("3D Seismic Contract") with CGG Veritas ("Veritas"). Under the terms of the 3D Seismic Contract, Veritas agreed to conduct the acquisition phase of a 4,000 square kilometer 3D seismic survey of the area that is subject to our rights, or Concession, to explore offshore Republic of Guinea. Our goal in contracting for the 3D seismic survey is to investigate multiple possible deepwater submarine fans seen on 2D seismic data that was previously obtained by us. The survey commenced in November 2011, using the survey vessel Oceanic Endeavour. The cost for the survey, processing and other services is expected to total approximately $30.0 million gross, with our 77% share being $23.1 million. The costs incurred as of June 30, 2012 amount to $26.3 million with our 77% share being $20.3 million and is capitalized in unevaluated oil and gas properties.

F-24


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. INVESTMENT IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES (Continued)

        The area of the 3D acquisition is just southwest and adjacent to one of the 3D surveys obtained by us in 2010. The most recent survey is expected to use Veritas BroadSeis broadband solution, which is expected to provide a more detailed image of the subsurface. After acquisition, the data will be processed by Veritas, with completion of that work expected in the first half of fiscal 2013.

Prospective Investment

        We made payments of $5,000,000 each in connection with a prospective oil and gas investment on September 20, 2011 and November 15, 2011. The $10,000,000 in deposits were to have been credited on the purchase price of the prospective investment. As negotiations terminated without an agreement, we have written off this deposit. The $10,000,000 write off has been included in income from operations in our Statement of Operations for the year ended June 30, 2012.

4. INVESTMENTS

        During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we purchased $55.7 million in debt securities which were classified as available-for-sale. These securities were subsequently sold during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2012, resulting in a realized loss of $0.4 million, compared to interest income earned over the life of the investments of $0.6 million. No investments were held as of June 30, 2012.

        The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of June 30, 2011:

(in thousands)
  Amortized
Cost
  Unrealized gains
(losses)
  Fair Value
(net)
 

US corporate debt securities

  $ 55,717   $ (349 ) $ 55,368  

Total debt securities

    55,717     (349 )   55,368  

Equity securities

             
               

Total available-for-sale

  $ 55,717   $ (349 ) $ 55,368  
               

        The Company had no securities classified as held-to-maturity as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.

5. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

        Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the following:

(in thousands)
  2012   2011  

Accounts payable—Trade

  $ 21,965   $ 2,228  

Accrued payroll and bonus

    4,220     364  

Accrued—Other

    419     524  
           

  $ 26,604   $ 3,116  
           

F-25


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

        Other current assets as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the following:

(in thousands)
  2012   2011  

Cash on deposit with payroll provider

  $ 3,429   $  

Short-term deposits

    25     40  

Other

    105     109  
           

  $ 3,559   $ 149  
           

7. WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

        Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC Topic No. 815-40 (formerly EITF 07-05) which defines determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity's own stock. This guidance specifies that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative but is both (a) indexed to our own stock and (b) classified in stockholders' equity in the statement of financial position, would not be considered a derivative financial instrument and provides a two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer's own stock and thus able to qualify for the scope exception.

        As a result of this adoption, certain warrants previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption are no longer afforded equity treatment because these warrants have an adjustment provision applicable to the exercise price that adjusted the exercise price downward in the event we subsequently issued common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than YA Global Investments, LP ("YA Global") exercise price, originally $2.00 per share. As a result, the warrants are not considered indexed to our stock, and as such, all future changes in the fair value of these warrants were recognized currently in earnings in our consolidated statement of operations under the caption "Other income (expense)—Gain (loss) on warrant derivative liability" until such time as the warrants were exercised.

        The exercise price of certain warrants issued to YA Global, which were completely exercised prior to December 31, 2010, were subject to adjustment in the event we subsequently issue common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than YA Global's exercise price, originally $2.00 per share. If these provisions had triggered, YA Global would have received warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock and a reduction in the exercise price of all their warrants.

        As such, effective July 1, 2009, we reclassified from additional paid-in capital, as a cumulative effect adjustment, $1,585,000 to Warrant Derivative Liability to recognize the fair value of the YA Global Warrants as if these warrants had been treated as a derivative liability since their issuance in February 2008.

        In September 2010, YA Global exercised 468,611 of these warrants on a cashless basis. This reduced the derivative liability by $705,000 and increased additional paid-in capital by the same amount. During the six months ended December 31, 2010, we recognized a $771,000 non-cash loss related to the remaining YA Global warrants.

        In October 2010, YA Global exercised its remaining warrants into 161,608 shares of stock on a cashless basis. As a result, we reduced the remaining derivative liability by $649,000 and increased

F-26


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

7. WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITY (Continued)

additional paid-in capital by the same amount. No warrant derivative liability exists as of June 30, 2012 or 2011.

8. INCOME TAXES

        Federal Income taxes are not currently due since Hyperdynamics has had losses since inception. Components of deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

(in thousands)
  2012   2011  

Current deferred tax assets:

             

Other current deferred tax assets

  $ 60   $  
           

Total current temporary differences

    60      

Less: valuation allowance

    (60 )    
           

Net current deferred tax assets

  $   $  
           

Non-current deferred tax assets

             

Stock compensation

  $ 1,999   $ 1,951  

Property and Equipment

    28      

Oil and Gas Properties

    46,194     5,485 (1)

Other non-current deferred tax assets

        12  
           

Total non-current deferred tax assets

  $ 48,221   $ 7,448  
           

Non-current deferred tax liabilities

             

Property and Equipment

  $   $ (165 )
           

Net operating losses

    22,751     15,204 (1)
           

    70,972     22,487  

Less: valuation allowance

    (70,972 )   (22,487 )
           

Net non-current deferred tax assets (liabilities)

  $   $  
           

(1)
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012, we identified certain errors in our previously issued consolidated financial statements within our deferred tax disclosure. The error was the result of an uncertain tax position related to the year ended June 30, 2010 that had not previously been disclosed, which impacted the presentation of our deferred tax balances and related disclosures as of June 30, 2011 and 2010. We have established the tabular roll-forward to disclose this uncertain tax position in this footnote, and the June 30, 2011 deferred tax balances have been corrected. The error in our previously disclosed deferred tax balances did not impact our consolidated balance sheets or statements of operations because the Company was in an overall deferred tax asset position with a full valuation allowance. We evaluated the materiality of the errors from both a qualitative and a quantitative perspective and concluded that these errors are immaterial to our previously issued consolidated financial statements. We have corrected the consolidated financial statements presented herein to reflect the correction of these errors.

F-27


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        Deferred tax assets have been fully reserved due to determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will not be able to realize the benefit from them.

        Hyperdynamics has U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $80,884,000 at June 30, 2012. The U.S. net operating losses contains excess tax benefits related to stock compensation in the amount of $2,441,000 which have not been included in the financial statements.

        Internal Revenue Code Section 382 restricts the ability to use these carryforwards whenever an ownership change, as defined, occurs. Hyperdynamics incurred such an ownership change on January 14, 1998 and again on June 30, 2001. As a result of the first ownership change, Hyperdynamics' use of net operating losses as of January 14, 1998, of $949,000, are restricted to $151,000 per year. The availability of losses from that date through June 30, 2001 of $3,313,000 are restricted to $784,000 per year. Currently the Company is analyzing whether the utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards from years subsequent to 2001 may be subject to a significant annual limitation due to ownership changes that have occurred previously under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.

        The Company underwent a restructuring during the current year that removed approximately $13,202,000 of net operating losses from the U.S. consolidated tax return. It is unlikely that the entity where these net operating losses reside will ever generate U.S. taxable income sufficient to utilize any of these losses. Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, it is not expected that any possible limitation will have an impact on the results of operations or financial position of the Company. The U.S. net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2019 to 2032.

        The difference between the statutory tax rates and our effective tax rate is primarily due to the valuation allowance applied against our deferred tax assets generated by net operating losses. A reconciliation of the actual taxes to the U.S. statutory tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

(in thousands)
  2012   2011   2010  

Income tax benefit at the statutory federal rate (35%)

  $ (52,256 ) $ (3,933 ) $ (2,803 )

Increase (decrease) resulting from nondeductible stock compensation

    1,454     (515 )    

Reduction of net operating losses related to excess tax benefits from non-qualifying stock options

    854          

Increase (decrease) resulting from nontaxable gain on derivative liability

        270     (98 )

Other, net

    1,403     14      

Change in valuation allowance

    48,545     4,164     2,901  
               

Net income tax expense

  $   $   $  
               

F-28


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2012 (in thousands):

 
  Federal, State
and Foreign
Tax
 
 
  (In thousands)
 

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ 0  

Additions to tax positions related to the current year

    5,485  

Additions to tax positions related to prior years

    0  

Statute expirations

    0  
       

Balance at June 30, 2010

  $ 5,485  
       

Additions to tax positions related to the current year

    0  

Additions to tax positions related to prior years

    0  

Statute expirations

    0  
       

Balance at June 30, 2011

  $ 5,485  
       

Additions to tax positions related to the current year

    0  

Additions to tax positions related to prior years

    0  

Statute expirations

    0  
       

Balance at June 30, 2012

  $ 5,485  
       

        The total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate was $0 for the years ended June 30, 2012, June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2010.

        During fiscal year 2012, we recorded an increase to the June 30, 2009 balance of $5,485,000 in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, of which $5,485,000 was an increase related to U.S. tax positions taken on the June 30, 2010 tax return. This liability for unrecognized tax benefits has been netted against the net operating losses disclosed in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.

        Our policy is to include potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within our income tax provision account. We have no accruals for the payment of interest, net of tax benefits, or penalties as of June 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

        We file income tax returns, including tax returns for our subsidiaries, with federal, state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to routine compliance review by the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we file tax returns in the ordinary course of business. We consider the United States to be our most significant tax jurisdiction; however, the taxing authorities in Guinea may audit various tax returns. We currently have no ongoing federal or state audits. The normal statute of limitations for tax returns being available for IRS audit is three years from the filing date of the return. However, net operating losses are subject to adjustment upon utilization of the loss to offset taxable income regardless of when the net operating loss was generated. Therefore, all of our historic losses are subject to adjustment until they are utilized or expire.We do not believe there will be any decreases to our unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

F-29


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Series A Preferred Stock

        In January 2000, we issued 3,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for net proceeds of $2,604,190. The stated value was $1,000 per share and par value is $0.001. This series was non-voting and had a dividend rate of 4%, payable at conversion in either cash or shares of common stock, at Hyperdynamics' option. During 2000 and 2001, 1,055 shares were converted to common stock. As a result, 1,945 shares remained outstanding at June 30, 2010. By terms of the original agreement, the preferred shares were convertible into Hyperdynamics' common stock at a price equivalent to the lower of the trading price when purchased of $5.25 or 80% of the current 5-day trading average. All or any of the stock could be converted at any time at the holder's option. According to the terms of the agreement, all preferred shares outstanding as of January 30, 2002 were to be automatically converted to common stock. If the Series A stock had been converted at that time, approximately 4,862,000 shares of common stock would have been issued. This conversion did not occur because of legal claims filed by both the Series A shareholders and Hyperdynamics against each other.

        Since the outcome was not known and no conversion had been effected, Hyperdynamics continued to accrue dividends on the 1,945 shares through September 30, 2004. Management evaluated the accrual as of September 30, 2004 and determined the accrual should be discontinued. Management reevaluated the accrual periodically and considered the accrual to be adequate to cover the liability, if any, pursuant to the lawsuit.

        On December 30, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which we issued 239,437 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of 1,945 outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. As part of the settlement, we were relieved of any Series A Preferred Stock dividend payments, two former officers agreed to the cancellation of an aggregate of 100,000 warrants which had an exercise price of $4.00 and 7,500 shares of our common stock were surrendered to us. As a result of this agreement, we were not required to issue the full amount of convertible securities under the terms of the Series A Preferred and we did not have to pay $372,000 of dividends we previously accrued as payable which represented accruals through September 30, 2004.

Common Stock issuances

Year ended June 30, 2012

For cash:

        On February 2, 2012, we closed the sale of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in a registered direct public offering. The net proceeds to us from the offering were approximately $28,162,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $3.50 per share, become exercisable in August 2012, and expire in April 2013.

For exercise of options:

        During the year ended June 30, 2012, 804,999 options were exercised for total gross proceeds of $670,000. The options were exercised at prices ranging from $0.31 to $2.00.

F-30


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)

For exercise of warrants:

        During the year ended June 30, 2012, we issued 340,208 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of warrants to purchase 430,000 shares of common stock.

Year ended June 30, 2011

For cash:

        On November 3, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with two institutional funds under management of affiliates of BlackRock (collectively, the "Investors") pursuant to which the Investors agreed to purchase an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per share in a private placement. At closing, we received approximately $29.9 million, net of offering costs.

        On March 25, 2011, we entered into an underwriting agreement providing for the offer and sale in a firm commitment underwritten offering of 25,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 per share ($4.75 per share net of underwriting discount but before deducting transaction expenses). In addition, we granted to the Underwriter a 45-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional shares of common stock from us at the offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On March 25, 2011, the Underwriter exercised its option with respect to all 3,750,000 shares.

        Closing of the sale of the shares of common stock, including the 3,750,000 shares purchased pursuant to exercise of the option by the Underwriter, was held on March 30, 2011. The Company received net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and commissions, and other transaction expenses, of approximately $136.1 million.

For exercise of options:

        During the year ended June 30, 2011, 858,613 options were exercised for total gross proceeds of $906,000. The options were exercised at prices ranging from $0.24 to $2.00.

For exercise of warrants:

        During the year ended June 30, 2011, 6,164,213 warrants were exercised for total gross proceeds of $7,709,000. The warrants were exercised at prices ranging from $0.98 to $1.58. Additionally, during the year ended June 30, 2011, we issued 384,848 and 175,714 shares of common stock to YA Global and a prior executive respectively upon the cashless exercise of warrants to purchase 702,222 and 240,000 shares of common stock respectively.

Issuance of common stock in Series A settlement:

        On December 30, 2010, we entered into a litigation settlement whereby we issued 239,437 shares of our common stock.

F-31


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)


Year ended June 30, 2010

Common Stock Issuances:

        During year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 442,049 shares of common stock from its Stock and Stock Option plan to employees, directors and consultants for services valued at $324,000. The shares were valued using the market close price on the date of grant. On November 12, 2009, we entered into a Shares Purchase Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, L.P. ("Enable"), which held certain securities that were previously issued by us. Pursuant to the Shares Purchase Agreement, we issued to Enable 1,578,948 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The aggregate net proceeds from the offering, after deducting offering expenses was approximately $1,485,000. The offering closed on November 17, 2009.

        On December 3, 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell an aggregate of 7,222,223 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase a total of 3,250,000 shares of its common stock to institutional investors for gross proceeds of approximately $6.5 million. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering, after deducting placement agent fees and the Company's offering expenses, were approximately $6,045,000. The placement agent also received warrants to purchase 144,444 shares of common stock as additional compensation. The purchase price of a share of common stock and fractional warrant was $0.90 with the warrants priced at $0.98. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants were exercisable 181 days following the closing date of the offering and expire four years following the initial exercise date at an exercise price of $0.98. The offering closed on December 7, 2009.

        On April 20, 2010, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell an aggregate of 8,076,925 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase a total of 2,826,923 shares of our common stock to institutional investors for gross proceeds of approximately $10.5 million. The net proceeds to us from the offering, after deducting placement agent fees and our offering expenses, were approximately $9,670,000. The purchase price of a share of common stock and warrant was $1.30. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants are exercisable 181 days following the closing date of the offering. Warrants to purchase 807,692 shares of common stock expire one year following the initial exercise date. Warrants to purchase 2,019,231 shares of common stock expire five years following the initial exercise date. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.58. The exercise price of the warrants is subject to adjustment in the case of stock splits, stock dividends, combinations of shares and similar recapitalization transactions.

Series B Preferred Stockholders

        Prior to the conversion of our Series B preferred stock on September 29, 2009, the Series B stockholders were entitled to a 4% cumulative dividend on the stated value, which was payable only upon conversion of the preferred stock. Dividends were to be paid in stock or cash at Hyperdynamics' option.

        On September 29, 2009, we entered into the Series B Agreement with the holders of all of our Series B preferred stock in which the Series B holders (i) converted all of their shares of Series B preferred stock into approximately 15,822,222 shares of common stock, (ii) agreed to the cancellation of warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock, (iii) agreed to donate, pursuant to a specified schedule, 2,000,000 shares of common stock, issued upon conversion of the Series B preferred

F-32


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)

stock, and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock, to the American Friends of Guinea, a charitable organization that provides support to the people of Guinea, and (iv) agreed to be subject to a nine month lock-up of the 15,822,222 million shares of common stock received in connection with the conversion of the Series B preferred stock, and any shares that may be received upon exercise of their warrants. The common stock received upon conversion represented a reduction of 2,000,000 shares that otherwise would have been issuable under the original terms of the Series B preferred stock.

        Under the terms of the Series B Agreement, if we completed an equity or debt financing in the future of $10,000,000 or more, we also agreed to (i) pay a previously owed dividend in the aggregate amount of $430,000 to the Series B holders and (ii) subject to market conditions, release from the lock-up provision described above, up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock received in connection with the Series B preferred stock conversion in order to allow for resale by the Series B holders. On April 23, 2010, following our April 20, 2010 registered direct offering, $430,000 was paid to the Series B holders for previously owed dividends.

        The Series B Agreement was terminated as a result of the Letter Agreements discussed above.

For exercise of warrants:

        During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, Enable exercised all warrants to purchase 4,646,465 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.95 for total gross proceeds of $4,414,142. Additionally, during the year ended June 30, 2010, we issued 201,490 shares of common stock to YA Global upon the cashless exercise of warrants to purchase 520,000 shares of common stock.

For exercise of options:

        During the year ended June 30, 2010, we issued 124,653 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of stock options to purchase 220,000 shares of common stock.

For conversion of convertible debenture:

        During the year ended June 30, 2010, based upon the conversion prices of $1.65 and $0.95 per share, the convertible debenture investor converted a total principal amount, including interest accreted to principal, of $1,296,000 (net of a discount of $1,116,000) into 1,949,411 shares of our common stock.

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

        On February 18, 2010, at our annual meeting of stockholders, the board of directors and stockholders approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"). Prior to the 2010 stockholder meeting, we had two stock award plans: the Stock and Stock Option Plan, which was adopted in 1997 ("1997 Plan") and the 2008 Restricted Stock Award Plan ("2008 Plan"). In conjunction with the approval of the 2010 Plan at the annual meeting, the 1997 Plan and 2008 Plan were terminated as of February 18, 2010. Subsequently, on February 17, 2012, the 2010 Plan was amended to increase the maximum shares issuable under the 2010 Plan.

F-33


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

        The 2010 Plan provides for the grants of shares of common stock, restricted stock or incentive stock options and/or nonqualified stock options to purchase our common stock to selected employees, directors, officers, agents, consultants, attorneys, vendors and advisors of ours' or of any parent or subsidiary thereof. Shares of common stock, options, or restricted stock can only be granted under this plan within 10 years from the effective date of February 18, 2010. A maximum of 10,000,000 shares are issuable under the 2010 Plan and at June 30, 2012, 2,044,019 shares remained available for issuance.

        The 2010 Plan provides a means to attract and retain the services of participants and also to provide added incentive to such persons by encouraging stock ownership in the Company. Plan grants are administered by the Compensation Committee, who has substantial discretion to determine which persons, amounts, time, price, exercise terms, and restrictions, if any.

        Additionally, from time to time, we issue non-compensatory warrants, such as warrants issued to investors.

        The fair value of non-market based options or warrants are estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. For market based options, the fair value was estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with inputs adjusted for the probability of the vesting criteria being met and the median expected term for each grant as determined by utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation. Expected volatility is based solely on historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. We rely solely on historical volatility as we do not have traded options. The expected term calculation for stock options is based on the simplified method as described in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin number 107. We use this method because we do not have sufficient historical information on exercise patterns to develop a model for expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U. S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant for an instrument with a maturity that is commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. The dividend yield rate of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

Stock Options

        The following table provides information about options during the years ended June 30:

 
  2012   2011   2010  

Number of options granted

    4,273,461     2,906,000     7,614,000  

Compensation expense recognized

  $ 5,024,825   $ 2,175,625   $ 1,578,792  

Compensation cost capitalized

    1,745,344     973,730      

Weighted average fair value of options outstanding

  $ 2.09   $ 1.85   $ 0.91  

F-34


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

        The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market values of employee and director stock options granted during the years ended June 30:

 
  2012   2011   2010  

Risk-free interest rate

    0.11 - 0.91 %   1.11 - 2.68 %   0.17 - 3.58 %

Dividend yield

    0 %   0 %   0 %

Volatility factor

    105 - 129 %   91 - 146 %   58 - 178 %

Expected life (years)

    0.25 - 3.25     0.9 - 6.0     0.23 - 5.0  

        Summary information regarding employee stock options issued and outstanding under all plans as of June 30, 2012 is as follows:

 
  Options   Weighted
Average Share
Price
  Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  Weighted
average
remaining
contractual life
(years)
 

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2009

    2,219,707   $ 3.27   $ 45,375     1.76  

Granted

    7,614,000     0.83              

Exercised

    (220,000 )   0.63              

Forfeited

    (130,000 )   2.05              

Expired

    (1,434,947 )   4.10              
                   

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2010

    8,048,760   $ 0.91   $ 2,589,600     6.20  
                   

Granted

    2,906,520     4.15              

Exercised

    (858,613 )   1.10              

Forfeited

    (438,053 )   0.90              

Expired

    (383,760 )   2.24              
                   

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2011

    9,274,854   $ 1.85   $ 23,558,086     5.65  
                   

Granted

    4,273,461     2.57              

Exercised

    (804,999 )   0.83              

Forfeited

    (248,000 )   5.51              
                   

Options outstanding at year ended June 30, 2012

    12,495,316   $ 2.09   $ 1,145,800     4.62  
                   

Options exercisable at year ended June 30, 2012

    4,697,261   $ 1.81   $ 498,925     4.47  
                   

F-35


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)


Options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2012

Exercise Price
  Outstanding
Number of
Shares
  Remaining Life   Exercisable
Number of Shares
 

$0.01 - 1.00

    40,000   1 year or less     40,000  

$0.01 - 1.00

    3,626,668   2 years     1,640,834  

$0.01 - 1.00

    1,843,461   5 years      

$1.01 - 2.00

    1,271,000   2 years     1,150,667  

$1.01 - 2.00

    30,000   5 years      

$1.01 - 2.00

    750,667   8 years     540,667  

$2.01 - 3.00

    77,000   5 years      

$2.01 - 3.00

    280,000   8 years     195,000  

$3.01 - 4.00

    990,000   4 years      

$3.01 - 4.00

    511,000   8 years     303,833  

$4.01 - 5.00

    1,183,000   4 years      

$4.01 - 5.00

    1,562,520   9 years     631,260  

$5.01 - 6.00

    100,000   1 year or less     100,000  

$5.01 - 6.00

    110,000   9 years     50,000  

$6.01 - 7.00

    30,000   9 years     15,000  

$7.01 - 8.00

    90,000   9 years     30,000  
               

    12,495,316         4,697,261  
               


Options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2011

Exercise Price
  Outstanding
Number of
Shares
  Remaining Life   Exercisable
Number of Shares
 

$0.01 - 0.49

    85,000   1 year     85,000  

$0.01 - 0.49

    3,550,000   3 years     1,227,500  

$0.50 - 1.00

    60,000   1 year     60,000  

$0.50 - 1.00

    443,334   3 years     216,667  

$1.00 - 1.49

    720,000   3 years     640,000  

$1.00 - 1.49

    914,000   9 years     377,000  

$1.50 - 1.99

    551,000   3 years     260,333  

$2.00 - 3.00

    120,000   1 year or less     120,000  

$2.00 - 3.00

    280,000   9 years     140,000  

$3.00 - 4.00

    536,000   9 years     140,000  

$4.00 - 5.00

    1,585,520   9 years      

$5.00 - 6.00

    310,000   9 years      

$6.00 - 7.00

    30,000   9 years      

$7.00 - 8.00

    90,000   9 years      
               

    9,274,854         3,266,500  
               

F-36


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

        At June 30, 2012, there was $6,926,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share based compensation arrangements granted to employees under the plans.

        During 2012, a total of 2,235,760 options, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $1.76 per share, vested in accordance with the underlying agreements. Unvested options at June 30, 2012 totaled 7,798,055 with a weighted average grant date fair value of $1.21, an amortization period of two to three years and a weighted average remaining life of 6.31 years.

Liability Awards

        During the first quarter of 2012, our Board of Directors approved an increase in authorized shares under the 2010 Plan from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 subject to shareholder approval. Prior to receiving shareholder approval, we reached the limit of shares available under the 2010 Plan during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, at which point we concluded that all additional awards granted should be classified as liabilities until shareholders approved the increase in the maximum shares issuable under the 2010 plan. Pending shareholder approval of the amended 2010 Plan, we granted options to purchase 1,180,520 shares of our common stock to employees. The 2010 Plan was amended by a shareholder vote to increase issuable shares from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 on February 17, 2012. The fair value on the date of modification was reclassified from a liability classification to equity. As of the modification date, we have recalculated the fair value of the awards and will amortize the unrecognized expense over the remaining vesting period.

        The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market value of awards modified as of February 17, 2012:

 
  2012  

Risk-free interest rate

    0.42 %

Dividend yield

    0 %

Volatility factor

    129 %

Expected life (years)

    2.5 - 3.2  

Warrants

        Warrant activity during the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010:

Year ended June 30, 2012:

        As a result of the equity transaction in February 2012, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to institutional investors. The warrants have an exercise price of $3.50 per share, a term of 14 month from the date they were granted, and are exercisable 6 months following the close of the transaction. The exercise price of the warrants may be adjusted in the case of stock splits, stock dividends or combinations of shares, or in the event the Company issues rights, options or warrants to all holders of the Company's common stock with an exercise or purchase price less than the volume weighted average price of the Company's shares on the record date. The warrants are considered indexed to our common stock and therefore are not considered a derivative. The warrants issued to the investors had a fair value of $7,820,000. The fair value of the 10,000,000 shares issued in the transaction was $22,180,000 based upon the market price on the transaction date.

F-37


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market value of the warrants:

 
  2012  

Risk-free interest rate

    0.15 %

Dividend yield

    0 %

Volatility factor

    105 %

Expected life (months)

    14  

Year ended June 30, 2011:

        During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, holders of warrants exercised an aggregate of 7,106,000 warrants with exercise prices ranging from $0.98 to $1.58 per share for total proceeds to us of $7,709,000, and 100,000 warrants held by former executives with a weighted average price of $4.00 were cancelled during the year. Additionally, YA Global exercised the remaining 702,222 of its warrants on a cashless basis and received 384,848 shares of our common stock.

Year ended June 30, 2010:

        The holders of all of our Series B preferred stock agreed to the cancellation of warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

        As a result of the offerings in November and December 2009, outstanding YA Global warrants to purchase 666,666 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.65 were amended to increase the number of underlying shares of common stock to 1,222,222 and decrease the exercise price to $0.90 per share. These warrants are included in the warrant derivative liability. The change in value of the warrants as a result of the amendment is reflected in the valuation of the derivative as of June 30, 2010.

        As a result of the equity transaction in November 2009, the exercise price of 2,424,243 warrants held by Enable and previously granted as part of an equity purchase, was reduced from $2.00 per share to $0.95 subject to no further adjustment other than for stock splits and stock dividends. The modification resulted in a deemed dividend of $322,000 which was calculated as the difference in the fair value of the warrants immediately before and after the modification using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market value of the warrant modification:

 
  Before
Modification
  After
Modification
 

Risk-free interest rate

    2.63 %   2.63 %

Dividend yield

    0 %   0 %

Volatility factor

    127 %   127 %

Remaining term (years)

    5.49     5.49  

        As a result of the equity transaction in November 2009, the exercise price of warrants held by Enable and previously granted as part of the convertible debenture transaction, was reduced from $2.50 to $0.95 per share for 1,111,111 warrants, and from $2.25 to $0.95 per share for 1,111,111 warrants,

F-38


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

subject to no further adjustment other than for stock splits and stock dividends. This modification resulted in an increased fair value of $158,000, which has been treated as additional interest expense and which was calculated as the difference in the fair value of the warrants immediately before and after the modification using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market value of the warrant modification:

 
  Before
Modification
  After
Modification
 

Risk-free interest rate

    2.63 %   2.63 %

Dividend yield

    0 %   0 %

Volatility factor

    125 %   125 %

Remaining term (years)

    5.80     5.80  

        During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, Enable exercised all 4,646,465 warrants for a total $4,414,142.

        As a result of the equity transaction in December 2009, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 3,250,000 shares of its common stock to institutional investors. The placement agent in the transaction received 144,444 warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.98 per share a term of four years from the date they become exercisable and are exercisable 181 days following the close of the transaction. The exercise price of the warrants may be adjusted in the case of stock splits, stock dividends or combinations of shares, or in the event the Company issues rights, options or warrants to all holders of the Company's common stock with an exercise or purchase price less than the volume weighted average price of the Company's shares on the record date. The warrants issued to the investors and the placement agent had a relative fair value of $1,572,000 and $70,000, respectively. The relative fair value of the 7,222,223 shares issued in the transaction was $4,403,000 based upon the market price on the transaction date. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market value of the warrant modification:

Risk-free interest rate

    2.14 %

Dividend yield

    0 %

Volatility factor

    118 %

Expected term (years)

    4.5  

        On April 20, 2010, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell an aggregate of 8,076,925 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase a total of 2,826,923 shares of its common stock to institutional investors for gross proceeds of approximately $10.5 million. The placement agent in the transaction received 161,539 warrants. The purchase price of a share of common stock and warrant was $1.30. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants are exercisable 181 days following the closing date of the offering. Warrants to purchase 807,692 shares of common stock expire one year following the initial exercise date. Warrants to purchase 2,019,231 shares of common stock expire five years following the initial exercise date. The warrants will have an exercise price of $1.58. The exercise price of the warrants is subject to adjustment in the case of stock splits, stock dividends, combinations of shares and similar recapitalization transactions. The warrants issued to the investors and the placement agent had a relative fair value of $442,000 and $1,755,000, respectively. The relative fair value of the 8,076,925 shares issued in the

F-39


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

transaction was $8,303,000 based upon the market price on the transaction date. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table details the significant assumptions used to compute the fair market value of the warrant modification:

Risk-free interest rate

    0.41 %   2.49 %

Dividend yield

    0 %   0 %

Volatility factor

    118 %   118 %

Remaining term

    1.5     5.5  

        Summary information regarding common stock warrants issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 is as follows:

 
  Warrants   Weighted
Average
Share Price
  Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life(years)
 

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2009

    10,343,131   $ 1.99   $ 45,375     5.59  

Granted

    6,938,462     1.16              

Exercised

    (5,166,465 )   0.94              

Expired

    (1,050,000 )   4.05              
                   

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2010

    11,065,128   $ 1.25   $ 1,168,000     3.93  
                   

Granted

                     

Exercised

    (7,106,435 )   1.20              

Expired

    (100,000 )   4.00              
                   

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2011

    3,858,693   $ 1.26   $ 11,737,345     3.03  
                   

Granted

    10,000,000     3.50              

Exercised

    (430,000 )   0.90              

Expired

                     
                   

Outstanding at year ended June 30, 2012

    13,428,693   $ 2.94         1.08  
                   


Warrants outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2012

Exercise Price
  Outstanding
Number of
Shares
  Remaining Life   Exercisable
Number of
Shares
 

$0.90

    2,810,000     2 years     2,810,000  

$0.98

    10,833     2 years     10,833  

$1.58

    207,860     3 years     207,860  

$3.50

    10,000,000     Less than1 year      

$4.00

    400,000     2 years     400,000  
                 

    13,428,693           3,428,693  
                 

F-40


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

Warrants outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2011

Exercise Price
  Outstanding
Number of
Shares
  Remaining
Life
  Exercisable
Number of
Shares
 

$0.90

    3,240,000     3 years     3,240,000  

$0.98

    10,833     3 years     10,833  

$1.58

    207,860     4 years     207,860  

$4.00

    400,000     3 years     400,000  
                 

    3,858,693           3,858,693  
                 

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LITIGATION AND OTHER LEGAL MATTERS

        From time to time, we and our subsidiaries are involved in business disputes that may occur in the ordinary course of business. We are unable to predict the outcome of such matters when they arise. Other than disputes currently disclosed under litigation, we are unaware of any other disputes that exist and do not believe that the ultimate resolution of such matters would have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. We review the status of on-going proceedings and other contingent matters with legal counsel. Liabilities for such items are recorded if and when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and when the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. If we are able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses, an estimated range of possible loss is disclosed for such matters in excess of the accrued liability, if any. Liabilities are periodically reviewed for adjustments based on additional information.

Shareholder Lawsuits

        On April 2, 2012, a lawsuit styled as a class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas against us and our chief executive officer alleging that we made false and misleading statements that artificially inflated our stock prices. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that we misrepresented the prospects and progress of our drilling operations, including our drilling of the Sabu-1 well and plans to drill the Baraka-1 well off the coast of the Republic of Guinea. The lawsuit seeks damages based on Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, although the specific amount of damages is not specified. On June 1 and June 4, 2012, a number of parties made application to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff for this action, but a lead plaintiff has not yet been selected by the Court. We anticipate a consolidated amended complaint will be filed in the matter once a lead plaintiff is appointed. We have assessed the status of this matter and have concluded that although an adverse judgment is reasonably possible, it is not probable. As a result, no provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements. Given the early stage of this dispute, we are unable to estimate a range of possible loss; however, in our opinion, the outcome of this dispute will not have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

        On April 5, 2012, a purported derivative action was filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, against all of our directors. The petition alleges that the directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with positive statements about our drilling operations and the Guinea Concession and disclosures related to material weaknesses that we identified in our financial controls. The plaintiff

F-41


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

seeks unspecified damages against our directors including restitution and disgorgement of profits and advances based on asserted causes of action for breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. On July 12, 2012, we and our directors filed special exceptions to the derivative lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiff failed to plead demand futility. The plaintiff did not make a demand on the Hyperdynamics Board prior to filing the derivative suit; therefore the lawsuit would be subject to dismissal unless the plaintiffs' pleadings sufficiently demonstrated that demand would be futile. In response, the plaintiff amended his petition on August 13, 2012. We have assessed the status of this matter and have concluded that although an adverse judgment is reasonably possible, it is not probable. As a result, no provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements. Given the early stage of this dispute, we are unable to estimate a range of possible loss; however, in our opinion, the outcome of this dispute will not have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Iroquois Lawsuit

        On May 9, 2012, a lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against us and all of our directors. The plaintiffs, five hedge funds that invested in us in early 2012, allege that we breached an agreement with the plaintiffs, and that we and the directors made certain negligent misrepresentations relating to the company's drilling operations. Among other claims, the plaintiffs allege that we misrepresented the status of our drilling operations and the speed with which the drilling would be completed. The plaintiffs advance claims for breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation and seek damages in the amount of $18.5 million plus pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs also seek indemnity for their legal expenses On July 12, 2012, we and the directors moved to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim as to all defendants and for lack of personal jurisdiction over the director defendants. The maximum possible loss is the full amount of $18.5 million plus interest accrued thereon until judgment. We, however, have assessed the status of this matter and have concluded that although an adverse judgment is reasonably possible, it is not probable. As a result, no provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the outcome of this dispute will not have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

AGR Lawsuit

        On June 21, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, SCS, filed suit against AGR following unsuccessful negotiations to address the cost overruns associated with the Sabu-1 well drilled off the coast of the Republic of Guinea. The suit was filed in London, England in the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court. SCS is seeking to recover damages and other relief from AGR for claims of mismanagement of the drilling of the Sabu-1 well and various breaches of contract that resulted in the cost overruns. Among other things, the lawsuit alleges that AGR mismanaged the selection, reconditioning and crew staffing for the Jasper Explorer drilling rig used to drill the Sabu-1 well, mismanaged other subcontractor relationships, failed to seek cost relief from its subcontractors, and failed to return to SCS inventory purchased by SCS but not used in the drilling of Sabu-1 well. AGR has not yet filed its defense in that matter, but has indicated it expects to file a counterclaim.

F-42


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Wellington Lawsuit

        On April 9, 2001, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit in Delaware styled Wellington, LLC vs. Hyperdynamics Corporation. The Plaintiff claimed that we did not carry out conversion of Series A preferred stock to common stock. The Delaware lawsuit was dismissed and similar litigation ensued in Georgia.

        On December 30, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which we issued 239,437 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of 1,945 outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. As part of the settlement, we were relieved of any Series A Preferred Stock dividend payments and two former officers agreed to the cancellation of an aggregate of 100,000 warrants which had an exercise price of $4.00. As a result of this agreement, we were not required to issue the full amount of convertible securities under the terms of the Series A Preferred and we did not have to pay $372,000 of dividends we previously accrued as payable. The common shares, based upon the stock price at the settlement date, had a fair market value of $1,183,000. The exchange of those common shares for the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the elimination of the corresponding dividend payable, and the cancellation of 100,000 warrants was a capital transaction and no gain or loss was recorded. We recorded $1,183,000 to additional paid-in capital, with a corresponding charge to additional paid-in capital of $811,000, which represented the difference between the fair market value of the common shares issued for settlement and the elimination of the accrued dividend payable related to the Series A Preferred Stock, resulting in a net credit to additional paid-in capital of $372,000.

Ashley and Wilburn Lawsuits

        Trendsetter Production Company was named in two separate lawsuits, Raymond Thomas et al v. Ashley Investment et al and Wilburn L. Atkins and Malcolm L. Mason Jr. vs. BP America Production et al, Nos. 38,839 and 41,913-B, respectively, "C", 5th Judicial District Court, Parish of Richland, State of Louisiana. These cases were environmental cleanup cases involving wells operated by Trendsetter prior to our acquisition of Trendsetter. In May 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement to which we paid $20,000 to settle this claim and received a court order dismissing the case. On June 30, 2011, we sold Trendsetter Production Company to Good Day Production, LLC for $20,000. The Company does not anticipate any additional liabilities relating to Trendsetter Production Company due to this sale.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contingent notes payable

        Our subsidiary, SCS, has $350,000 remaining of a contingent note payable due to the former owners of SCS Corporation's assets. It is payable in our common stock and it is payable only if SCS has net income in any given quarter. If SCS experiences net income in a quarter, 25% of the income will be paid against the note, until the contingency is satisfied.

F-43


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Operating Leases

        We lease office space under long-term operating leases with varying terms. Most of the operating leases contain renewal and purchase options. We expect that in the normal course of business, the majority of operating leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases.

        The following is a schedule by years of minimum future rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in excess of one year as of June 30, 2012:

Years ending June 30:
(in thousands)

   
 

2013

    297  

2014

    326  

2015

    229  

2016

     

2017

     
       

Total minimum payments required

  $ 852  
       

        Rent expense included in net loss from operations for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $483,000, $295,000 and $154,000, respectively.

12. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

        Shown below are selected unaudited quarter data for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share data):

 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

2012:

                         

Depreciation

  $ 179   $ 241   $ 230   $ 177  

Selling, general and administrative

    4,352     5,726     4,893     7,091  

Full amortization of proved oil and gas properties

            112,145     4,167  

Write-off of prospective investment deposit

            10,000      

Loss from operations

    (4,531 )   (5,967 )   (127,268 )   (11,435 )

Net loss

    (4,376 )   (6,323 )   (127,198 )   (11,416 )

Basic and diluted loss per common share:

  $ (0.03 ) $ (0.04 ) $ (0.78 ) $ (0.07 )

 

 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

2011:

                         

Depreciation

  $ 70   $ 71   $ 100   $ 112  

Selling, general and administrative

    2,049     3,218     2,571     2,678  

Loss from operations

    (2,119 )   (3,289 )   (2,671 )   (2,790 )

Net loss

    (2,883 )   (3,282 )   (2,638 )   (2,435 )

Basic and diluted loss per common share:

  $ (0.03 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (0.02 ) $ (0.02 )

F-44


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

12. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

        The sum of the individual quarterly net loss per share amounts may not agree with year-to-date net loss per share as each quarterly computation is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during that period. In addition, certain potentially dilutive securities were not included in any of the quarterly computations of diluted net loss per share because to do so would have been antidilutive.

13. SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

        In December 2008 the SEC announced revisions to its regulations on oil and gas reporting. In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standards update which was intended to harmonize the accounting literature with the SEC's new regulations.

        Future cash flows beginning in for 2010 would be computed by applying average price for the year to the year-end quantities of proved reserves. The average price for the year would be calculated using the twelve month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first day of the month price for each month within such period. The Company had no proved reserves in 2012, 2011, and 2010.

        Estimates of reserve quantities and related standardized measure of discounted net cash flows are estimates only, and are not intended to reflect realizable values or fair market values of reserves. Reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than producing oil and gas properties. Additionally, the price of oil has been very volatile and downward changes in prices can significantly affect quantities that are economically recoverable. Accordingly, estimates are expected to change as future information becomes available and these changes may be significant.

        Proved reserves are estimated reserves of crude oil and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those expected to be recovered through existing wells, equipment and operating methods.

        The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows are computed by applying average price for the year (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves, less estimated future expenditures (based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves, less estimated future income tax expenses. The estimated future net cash flows are then discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated timing of the future cash flows.

F-45


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Capitalized Costs Related to Oil and Gas Activities

        Aggregate capitalized costs relating to the Hyperdynamics' crude oil and natural gas producing activities, including asset retirement costs and related accumulated depreciation, depletion & amortization are shown below:

(in thousands)
  United
States
  Republic of
Guinea
  Total  

June 30, 2012

                   

Unproved properties

  $   $ 39,278   $ 39,278  

Proved properties

        116,312     116,312  

Oilfield equipment

             
               

        155,590     155,590  

Less accumulated DD&A

        (116,312 )   (116,312  
               

Net capitalized costs

  $   $ 39,278     39,278  
               

June 30, 2011

                   

Unproved properties

  $   $ 36,200   $ 36,200  

Proved properties

             

Oilfield equipment

             
               

        36,200     36,200  

Less accumulated DD&A

             
               

Net capitalized costs

  $   $ 36,200   $ 36,200  
               

June 30, 2010

                   

Unproved properties

  $   $ 92   $ 92  

Proved properties

             

Oilfield equipment

             
               

        92     92  

Less accumulated DD&A

             
               

Net capitalized costs

  $   $ 92   $ 92  
               

F-46


Table of Contents


HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Activities

        Costs incurred in connection with Hyperdynamics' crude oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration and development activities are shown below:

(in thousands)
  United
States
  Republic of
Guinea
  Total  

June 30, 2012

                   

Property acquisition:

                   

Unproved

  $   $   $  

Proved

        90,834     90,834  

Exploration

        28,556     28,556  

Development

             
               

Total costs incurred

  $     $ 119,390   $ 119,390  
               

June 30, 2011

                   

Property acquisition:

                   

Unproved

  $   $ 9,226   $ 9,226  

Proved

             

Exploration

        26,882     26,882  

Development

             
               

Total costs incurred

  $   $ 36,108   $ 36,108  
               

June 30, 2010

                   

Property acquisition:

                   

Unproved

  $   $ 185   $ 185  

Proved

             

Exploration

        15,232     15,232  

Development

             
               

Total costs incurred

  $   $ 15,417   $ 15,417  
               

Proved Reserves

        We do not hold any proved reserves as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.

F-47


Table of Contents

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        On June 15, 2011, we discharged our former certifying accountant, GBH CPAs, PC. During the past two fiscal years, there were no adverse opinions or disclaimers of opinion, or qualifications or modifications as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles by GBH CPAs, PC in those reports. The decision to change accountants was approved by our audit committee of the board of directors. During the two fiscal years and during the interim period commencing on July 1, 2010 and ending on June 15, 2011, preceding the discharge of GBH CPAs, PC as our principal accountants, there were no disagreements with GBH CPAs, PC, whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to GBH CPAs, PC's satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report. GBH CPAs, PC did not advise us: (A) that internal controls necessary to develop reliable financial statements did not exist; or (B) that information had come to its attention which made it unwilling to rely on management's representations, or unwilling to be associated with the financial statements prepared by management; or (C) that the scope of the audit should have been expanded significantly, or that information had come to its that it concluded would, or if further investigated might, (i) materially impact the fairness or reliability of a previously issued audit report or the underlying financial statements, or the financial statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal period(s) subsequent to the date of the most recent audited financial statements (including information that might prevent the issuance of an unqualified audit report), and (ii) cause it to be unwilling to rely on management's representations or be associated with our financial statements; or (D)(1) that information had come to its attention that it had concluded materially impacts the fairness or reliability of either: (i) a previously issued audit report or the underling financial statements, or (ii) the financial statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal period(s) subsequent to the date of the most recent financial statements covered by an audit report (including information that, unless resolved to GBH CPAs, PC's satisfaction, would prevent it from rendering an unqualified audit report on those financial statements), and (2) that there were any issues that had not been resolved to GBH CPAs, PC's satisfaction prior to its dismissal.

        On June 15, 2011, we engaged Deloitte & Touche to be our new certifying accountant. During the two fiscal years and during the interim period commencing on July 1, 2010 and ending on June 15, 2011, preceding the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our principal accountants, we did not consult with Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding: the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements and neither written or oral advice was provided that was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.

        We provided the disclosure contained herein to GBH CPAs, PC, which provided a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made by us and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. That letter was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 17, 2011.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

        We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its

34


Table of Contents

principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

        We have identified certain control deficiencies resulting from the lack of effective detective and monitoring controls being designed within internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies related to oversight and review of financial information in the area of income taxes. This condition manifested in adjustments to the financial statements and related disclosures, and there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements would not have been prevented or detected.

        As a result of this material weakness, we concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of June 30, 2012. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

Item 9B.    Other Information.

        None.

PART III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

        The following table sets forth each of our Directors' name, age, and positions and offices with us. The expiration of each of their current terms as our directors expires at the next annual meeting of our stockholders. There is no family relationship between or among any of the Directors and our Executive Officers. Board vacancies are filled by a majority vote of the Board. We have an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Government Relations Committee.

Name
  Position   Age  

Ray Leonard

  Director, CEO and President     59  

Robert A. Solberg*

  Director and Non-Executive Chairman     66  

Herman Cohen*

  Director     80  

William O. Strange*

  Director     69  

Lord David Owen*

  Director     74  

Fred Zeidman*

  Director     66  

*
Independent Director

         Ray Leonard was appointed to the Board of Directors and was appointed CEO and President in July 2009. Mr. Leonard most recently served as the Vice President of Eurasia & Exploration for the newly formed Kuwait Energy Company from December 2006 to June 2009. From January 2005 to November 2006, Mr. Leonard served as the Senior Vice President of International Exploration and Production of MOL Plc. Mr. Leonard also served as Vice President of Exploration & New Ventures for YUKOS, Russia's second largest oil company, based in Moscow, Russia from February 2001 to December 2004. Prior to joining YUKOS, Leonard held the title of Vice President of Exploration with First International Oil from June 1998 to January 2001. Previously, Mr. Leonard spent 19 years with Amoco, where he began as a geologist and was promoted to the executive level as Vice President of Resource Acquisitions. During his tenure at Amoco, he held a three-year assignment as Division Geologist in West Africa. Mr. Leonard holds a Master of Arts in Geology from the University of Texas-Austin and a Bachelor of Science in Geosciences from the University of Arizona.

35


Table of Contents

        In addition to the professional and education background and experience described above, the following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the Board to conclude that Mr. Leonard should serve as a director:

         Leadership Experience—Mr. Leonard has held numerous roles in key executive management over his career including the Vice President of Exploration for YUKOS and First International Oil, and Senior Vice President of Exploration and Production for MOL.

         Industry Experience—Mr. Leonard has worked in the Oil & Gas industry his entire career in various Exploration and Production companies and has presented in numerous international forums on world oil reserves and future industry trends.

         Robert A. Solberg was appointed to the Board of Directors in August 2009 and serves as non-executive Chairman of the Board. He was the president of Texaco Inc.'s Worldwide Development division from 1998 until his retirement in 2002. Prior to 1998, Mr. Solberg held senior management positions at Texaco, Inc. for operations in the U.S., the Middle East, Asia, Latin America, West Africa and Europe. Mr. Solberg retired in July 2010 after serving as a director and the non-executive chairman of Scorpion Offshore, an offshore drilling company that was traded on the Oslo, Norway stock exchange. Mr. Solberg is also a director and equity participant in JDR Cables Ltd, a privately owned company which supplies custom subsea connection equipment and power cables. Mr. Solberg is a licensed petroleum engineer, and he holds a B.S Degree in Civil Engineering—University of North Dakota (1969).

        In addition to the professional and education background and experience described above, the following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the Board to conclude that Mr. Solberg should serve as a director:

         Leadership Experience—Mr. Solberg has held various key executive positions with public companies such as the president of Texaco Inc.'s Worldwide Development division and the chairman of Scorpion Offshore.

         Industry Experience—Mr. Solberg has worked in the Oil & Gas industry his entire career in various Exploration and Production companies

         Herman Cohen was appointed to the Board of Directors in July 2009. Mr. Cohen has been the owner of Cohen & Woods International since 1998. At Cohen & Woods International, Mr. Cohen specializes in providing strategic planning services to African governments and companies doing business in Africa. Mr. Cohen also served as a Senior Advisor to the Global Coalition for Africa from 1993-1998 under contract to the World Bank. Previous to his position at the World Bank, Mr. Cohen served in the U.S. Foreign Service from 1955-1993. During his diplomatic career, Mr. Cohen served as the U.S. Ambassador to Senegal and Gambia from 1977 to 1980, and from 1989 to 1993 Mr. Cohen served as assistant secretary of state for African Affairs under President George H.W. Bush.

        In addition to the professional and education background and experience described above, the following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the Board to conclude that Mr. Cohen should serve as a director:

         Leadership Experience—Mr. Cohen has held numerous responsible roles in the US Government including the American Ambassador to Senegal and the U.S. assistant secretary of state for African Affairs.

         William O. Strange was appointed to the Board of Directors in November 2010. Mr. Strange was an audit partner with Deloitte & Touche LLP prior to his retirement in May 2005. He joined the international accounting firm in 1964 and became a partner in 1976. During his 41 years with Deloitte & Touche LLP he specialized in audits of SEC registrants for a variety of publicly traded energy clients in exploration and production, petrochemicals, pipelines and oil services. Since 2005 he

36


Table of Contents

has been engaged in independent financial and accounting consulting services. Mr. Strange is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma and lives in Houston. He is on the Finance and Audit Committee of the Presbytery of the New Covenant, the governing body for Presbyterian Churches in the Gulf Coast area. He has served as the President of the Petroleum Club of Houston and as a member of the Major Cases Committee of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.

        In addition to the professional and education background and experience described above, the following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the Board to conclude that Mr. Strange should serve as a director:

         Leadership Experience—Mr. Strange worked over 41 years for Deloitte & Touche LLP, including 29 years as an audit partner. While at Deloitte & Touche LLP, most of his clients were in the energy industry, including many exploration and production companies and he spent the vast majority of his time working on clients which reported to the SEC. He has also lived overseas and understands foreign operations.

         Financial Experience—In addition to his over 41 years at Deloitte & Touche LLP, Mr. Strange was considered a Senior Technical Partner at Deloitte & Touche LLP. He has extensive knowledge of energy industry economics and business methods. He has worked with more than 20 audit committees of public company clients and understands the best practices of audit committees.

         Lord David Owen was appointed to the Board of Directors in September 2009. Since 2002, Lord Owen has been the non-executive chairman of Europe Steel, Ltd., and from 1996 to April 2011, the non-executive director of Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (NYSE: ABT). He was also the chairman of YUKOS International U.K. B.V., part of the former Russian oil company, YUKOS, from 2002 until 2005. Prior to that, he was Executive Chairman of Global Natural Energy Ltd, a metals trading company with interests in gasoline stations in the United Kingdom. Lord Owen was also a member of the advisory board of Terra Firma Capital Partners from 2004 until 2008. He served as a Member of the British Parliament for 26 years and is currently a Member of the House of Lords. In Government Lord Owen was appointed to a number of posts in the British Government including Navy Minister, Health Minister and from 1977 to 1979 British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. During that time he was heavily involved in diplomatic activity in both South and West Africa. Lord Owen was the opposition Labor Party spokesman on Energy from 1979 until 1980. He co-founded the British Social Democratic Party in 1981 and served as its leader from 1983 until 1990. From 1992-95 he was the EU peace negotiator in the former Yugoslavia.

        In addition to the professional and education background and experience described above, the following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the Board to conclude that Lord Owen should serve as a director:

         Leadership Experience—Lord Owen has held numerous responsible roles in the British Government and international roles. He also has served on various boards of public companies.

         Fred Zeidman was appointed to our Board of Directors in December 2009. Mr. Zeidman was appointed by President George W. Bush as the Chairman Emeritus of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council and served in that position from 2002 through 2010. Mr. Zeidman also serves as Chairman of the University of Texas Health Science System Houston and is on the Board of Trustees of the Texas Health Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR). He further serves on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the University of St. Thomas and chairs its Audit and Finance Committee. Mr. Zeidman currently is Chairman of the Board of Petroflow Energy and Gravis Oil Corporation. He was formerly Chief Restructuring Officer of Transmeridian Exploration, Inc., Bankruptcy Trustee of AremisSoft Corp., CEO and Chairman of the Board of Seitel Inc., Interim President of Nova Bio Fuels, Inc. and Senior Director Governmental Affairs Ogilvy Government Relations in Washington, DC. Mr. Zeidman also serves on the Board of Prosperity Bank in Houston.

37


Table of Contents

Mr. Zeidman holds a Bachelor's degree from Washington University in St. Louis and a Masters in Business Administration degree from New York University.

        In addition to the professional and education background and experience described above, the following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the Board to conclude that Mr. Zeidman should serve as a director:

         Leadership Experience—Mr. Zeidman has served in numerous roles of executive and directorship responsibility including serving on the board of Prosperity Bank for 26 years and acting as Chairman of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council.

         Financial Experience—Mr. Zeidman has a Masters in Business Administration degree and was the Chief Restructuring Officer for Transmeridian Exploration.

Executive officers

         Paul C. Reinbolt , 57, became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in August 2011. He has over 30 years of previous experience with Marathon Oil Corporation in various management positions in finance, treasury and accounting. Mr. Reinbolt was appointed Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of Marathon Oil Corporation effective January 2002. Mr. Reinbolt holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting and a Master of Business Administration degree in finance from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. He is on the Board of Directors of Oil Investment Corporation Ltd. and Oil Casualty Investment Corporation Ltd. He also serves as a member of the Business Advisory Council for the Farmer School of Business at Miami University.

         Jason D. Davis , 40, became our Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary in July 2009. In August 2010, Mr. Davis stepped down as the Chief Financial Officer. He currently serves as the Vice President of Finance, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Davis is a licensed certified public accountant and has served in various financial positions for several companies including the Assistant Controller at Isolagen, Inc (AMEX: ILE) from March 2004 to August 2005, the Manager of SEC Reporting at Texas Genco, LLC from August 2005 to June 2006, and the Controller at Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. (PDRT.PK) from June 2006 to June 2009. Mr. Davis also served as the interim Chief Financial Officer for Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. from January 2009 to June 2009. Mr. Davis was an accountant with Deloitte & Touche LLP after obtaining his BBA in Accountancy and Taxation from the University of Houston in 1997 until 2003.

         Michael Palmer, 56, became our Vice President of Operations in May 2010 and in March 2011 was promoted to Senior Vice President of Operations. Mr. Palmer has been working for 30 years in operations and production as a production engineer and manager after graduating from the University of Washington with a degree in Chemical Engineering. He started in the oil industry as a production engineer with Amoco Production Company in 1980 in Powell, Wyoming. During his 19 years with Amoco he worked on various oil projects around the world including the US, Gabon, and Russia. Subsequently he went to work for Nations Energy Company for 9 years initially as the head of the Kazakhstan operation before taking over their Azerbaijan project. Michael was named as one of the top 21 oilmen in Kazakhstan during their first 10 years of existence. Prior to coming to work for Hyperdynamics, Michael was the Chief Operating Officer for SIPC (Syria) in Damascus.

         David Wesson , 53, became our Principal Accounting Officer in October 2011. Since 2010, Mr. Wesson has served as our Controller, and he will continue to serve in that capacity. From 1988-2009, he was employed by Swift Energy Company, serving as Controller from 2001-2009. He previously worked at Tenneco Oil Company as a Senior Accountant/Financial Analyst. Mr. Wesson received a BBA in Accounting from Texas Tech University. He is a member of the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants.

38


Table of Contents

Board Meetings During Fiscal Year 2012

        The Board of Directors held 13 meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

Board Committees

Committee Assignments

        The table below reflects the composition of the committees of the Board.

Name of Director
  Audit
Committee
  Compensation
Committee
  Nominating and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
  Government
Relations
Committee

Robert A. Solberg*

  Member   Chairman   Chairman    

William O. Strange

  Chairman   Member   Member    

Hon. Lord David Owen

          Member   Member

Fred Zeidman

  Member   Member   Member    

Herman Cohen

          Member   Chairman

Ray Leonard

              Member

*
Chairman of the Board.

        The Audit Committee of the Company reviews the adequacy of systems and procedures for preparing the financial statements and the suitability of internal financial controls. The audit committee also reviews and approves the scope and performance of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. Messrs. Zeidman, Solberg and Strange are the members of the Audit Committee. All committee members are independent. Mr. Strange is the chairman of the Audit Committee and financial expert based on his experience at Deloitte and Touche LLP. The Audit Committee has a written charter, which is available at the Company's website at www.hyperdynamics.com. The audit committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter annually. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Audit Committee met five times.

        The members of our Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Solberg, Zeidman and Strange. Mr. Solberg is the chairman of the Compensation Committee. All committee members are independent. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Compensation Committee met one time. The Compensation Committee has a written charter, which is available at the Company's website at www.hyperdynamics.com.

        The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisted of Messrs. Solberg, Owen, Strange, Zeidman and Cohen. Mr. Solberg is the chairman of the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. All committee members are independent. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee did not meet. Though neither the Board of Directors nor the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a formal policy concerning diversity, the Board of Directors value diversity on the Board and believes diversity should be considered in the director identification and nominating process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a written charter, which is available at the Company's website at www.hyperdynamics.com.

        The members of our Government Relations Committee are Messrs. Cohen, Leonard and Owen. Messrs. Cohen and Owen are independent. Mr. Cohen is the chairman of the Government Relations Committee. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Governmental Relations Committee met four times. The Governmental Relations Committee does not have a charter.

39


Table of Contents

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

        Board of Directors Leadership Structure.     Our Board of Directors has no fixed policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board retains the discretion to make this determination on a case-by-case basis from time to time as it deems to be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders at any given time. The Board currently believes that separating the positions of CEO and Chairman is the best structure to fit the Company's needs. This structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of the Board. As described above, the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees of the Board of Directors are comprised entirely of independent directors. The Board also believes that this structure is preferred by a significant number of the Company's stockholders.

        Board of Directors Risk Oversight.     The Board's role in the Company's risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. The full Board (or the appropriate committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) receives these reports from the appropriate "risk owner" within the organization to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies. When a committee receives the report, the Chairman of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full Board during the next Board meeting. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.

Audit Committee Report

        The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by SAS 90 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU § 380), as may be modified or supplemented. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, as may be modified or supplemented, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant's independence. Based on the review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

Members of the Audit Committee:

/s/ William O. Strange
/s/ Robert A. Solberg
/s/ Fred Zeidman

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting compliance

        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with except for the following late filings: (a) Mr. Herman Cohen was late filing one Form 4 with respect to two transactions, which were subsequently reported on one Form 4; (b) Jason Davis was late filing one Form 4 with respect to one transaction, which was subsequently reported on one Form 4; (c) David Wesson was late filing one Form 3 and one Form 4, which were subsequently reported on those forms; (d) Michael Palmer was late filing one Form 4 with respect to three transactions, which were subsequently reported on one Form 4.

40


Table of Contents

Code of Ethics

        We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, which was filed on Form 10-KSB/A on May 16, 2005. We will provide without charge a copy of our Code of Ethics upon request. Such request should be directed in writing to: Jason Davis, Secretary, Hyperdynamics Corporation, 12012 Wickchester Lane, Suite 475 Houston, TX 77079, voice: (713) 353-9400, fax: (713) 353-9421. Our Web site is www.hyperdynamics.com.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        Our compensation discussion and analysis for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 discusses the compensation for our Named Executive Officers ("NEO's") who are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below and consist of our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and our other executive officers. In this compensation discussion and analysis, the terms "we" and "our" refer to Hyperdynamics Corporation, and not the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Objectives and Elements

What are the objectives of our executive officer compensation program?

        The objectives of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in determining executive compensation are to (1) attract and retain key individuals who are important to the continued success of Hyperdynamics, and (2) provide strong financial incentives, at reasonable cost to the shareholders, for senior management to enhance the value of the shareholders' investment.

What is our executive officer compensation program designed to reward?

        Our compensation program is designed to reward individuals for the achievement of our business goals and to foster continuity of management by encouraging key individuals to maintain long-term careers with Hyperdynamics.

What are the elements of our executive officer compensation program and why do we provide each element?

        The elements of compensation that the Compensation Committee uses to accomplish these objectives include base salaries, bonus, and long term incentives in the form of stock and stock options. We also provide perquisites to certain executives and health and insurance to all employees. The elements of compensation that we offer help us to attract and retain our officers. The specific purpose of each element is outlined below.

Base Salaries

        We provide fixed annual base salaries as consideration for each individual's performance of his or her job duties. Salaries are set based on level of responsibility, skills, knowledge, experience, and contribution to Hyperdynamics' business.

Bonus

        Bonuses may be awarded as part of annual salary and it is a component of variable compensation. Bonuses are based on goals and objectives that each employee must meet during the fiscal year. Each employee is given a target bonus percentage and the Compensation Committee and the full board of directors determine the awarded bonuses, if any.

41


Table of Contents

Long-term Incentives

        We provide long-term incentives in the form of stock and stock options; customarily stock options. Long-term incentives are a component of variable compensation because the amount of income ultimately earned is dependent upon and varies with Hyperdynamics' common stock price over the term of the option. The stock option awards tie a portion of executive compensation to the stock price and accordingly the financial results of the company. Hyperdynamics does not use a formula to determine stock and stock option awards to executives. Stock option awards are not designed to be tied to yearly results. Hyperdynamics views stock option awards as a means to encourage equity ownership by executives and thus to generally align the interests of the executives with the shareholders.

        Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant stock options, restricted stock, and stock registered under a Form S-8 registration statement to officers and other key employees. The Compensation Committee implements this authority by awarding stock options designed to align the interests of all senior executives to those of shareholders. This is accomplished by awarding stock options, which rise in value based upon the market price rise of Hyperdynamics' common stock, on a systematic basis.

        We report the estimated fair value of our stock option grants, as determined for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 718, using either the Black-Scholes option pricing model or a Monte Carlo model, in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. The amount reflected for accounting purposes does not reflect whether the executive has or will realize a financial benefit from the awards. Because stock option awards are made at a price equal to or above the market price on the date of grant, stock options have no intrinsic value at the time of grant. We believe the potential appreciation of the option awards over the stock price provide motivation to executives.

Perquisites

        Perquisites are determined on a case-by-case basis and currently, no executive officer receives such perquisites. Two former officers during fiscal year 2010 did receive perquisites and include the following:

        In accordance with his negotiated employment agreement, Harry Briers was provided a company car. Kent Watts (former CEO, President and Director) was provided a company car pursuant to his employment agreement that terminated on July 1, 2009 pursuant to its terms.

How do we determine the amount for each element of executive officer compensation?

        Our policy is to provide compensation packages that are competitively reasonable and appropriate for our business needs. We consider such factors as competitive compensation packages as negotiated with our officers; evaluations of the CEO and other executive officers; achievement of performance goals and milestones as additional motivation for certain executives; officers' ability to work in relationships that foster teamwork among our executive officers; officers' individual skills and expertise, and labor market conditions. We do not, at this time, engage a third-party compensation consultant.

        During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2011, and 2012, total executive compensation consists of base salary, bonuses and option awards. Generally, the option awards for executives negotiated in the executive's contract, with an exercise price based on the market price on the grant date. Option awards are also granted to employees on a case by case basis throughout the year. Because of the simplicity of the compensation package, there is very little interaction between decisions about the individual elements of compensation.

42


Table of Contents

Administration of Executive Compensation

        The Compensation Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of the CEO, evaluates the CEO's performance and sets his compensation. The Compensation Committee also reviews the CEO's recommendations for and sets the salaries and bonuses of other key officers and employees. In determining compensation policies and procedures, the Compensation Committee considers the results of shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation and how have the votes effected executive compensation decision and policies.

CEO involvement in compensation decisions

        The CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee concerning the employment packages of all subordinate officers. Neither the CEO nor any other company officer or employee attends periodic executive sessions of the Compensation Committee.

How compensation or amounts realizable from prior compensation are considered

        The amount of past compensation generally does not affect current year considerations because bonuses and long term incentives are awarded for each individual fiscal year's job performance.

Tax considerations

        The company's compensation plans are designed generally to ensure full tax deductibility of compensation paid under the plans. This includes compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the company's tax deduction for an executive's compensation to $1 million unless certain conditions are met. For fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 the full amount of all compensation provided to all executives was tax deductible to the company.

Timing, grant date, and exercise price for stock option awards

        Our policy is to award stock options upon hiring of the employee and on a case by case basis throughout the year. Stock option exercise prices are the closing price on the date of grant. We also have made certain awards based on the completion of performance criteria.

Analysis of variations in individual NEO's compensation

        Each NEO's compensation is detailed in the Compensation Tables. Each NEO's contract is described under the caption Agreements with Executives and Officers.

Employment Agreements with Current CEO and CFO

        As more fully described below in "Agreements with Executives and Officers," in July 2009, the Compensation Committee approved employment agreements with Ray Leonard, our current CEO and President, and Jason Davis, our former CFO and current treasurer. In July 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the employment agreements with Paul Reinbolt, our Chief Financial Officer.

COMPENSATION TABLES

        The following tables show salaries, bonuses, incentive awards, retirement benefits and other compensation relating to fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for the Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and our other executive officers. Columns for which there was no compensation have been omitted.

43


Table of Contents


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name &Principal Position
                   (a)
  Year
(b)
  Salary
($) (c)
  Bonus
($) (d)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($) (e)(2)
  Option
Awards
($) (f)(2)
  All Other
Compensation
($) (g)(3)
  Total
($) (h)
 

Ray Leonard, President and CEO

    2012     363,000     363,000         223,938     11,065     961,003  

    2011     330,000     594,000             17,626     941,626  

Paul Reinbolt, Executive Vice President and CFO

   
2012
   
275,000
   
193,330
   
   
1,895,386
   
   
2,363,716
 

Jason Davis, Former Principal Financial Officer

   
2012
   
220,000
   
140,000
   
   
48,071
   
   
408,071
 

    2011     210,000     160,000         371,663     16,226     757,889  

Michael Palmer, Senior Vice President of Operations

   
2012
   
231,000
   
135,300
   
   
41,733
   
10,001
   
418,034
 

    2011     210,000     190,000         424,105     28,362     852,467  

David Wesson, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

   
2012
   
198,000
   
110,000
   
   
38,817
   
10,130
   
356,947
 

(1)
Column (d): Payments made on fiscal 2012 and 2011 bonus pay-out were made in July 2012 and June 2011.

(2)
Columns (e) and (f): Reflects the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, for option awards granted in fiscal year 2012. For a description of the assumptions used for purposes of determining grant date fair value, see Note 10 to the Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012.

(3)
Column (g): Payments made for perquisites that include relocation expense and company matches of the 401(k) plan that exceed $10,000.

Bonuses and Stock Awards

        The following tables show cash and stock awards made to the named executives in fiscal year 2012, their outstanding equity awards at the end of fiscal year 2012.


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL YEAR 2012

 
   
   
   
   
  Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards  
 
   
   
   
   
   
  All Other Option Awards:    
 
Name
   (a)
  Action Date
(b)
  Grant Date
(3) (b)
  Threshold
($) (c)
  Target
($) (d)
  Maximum
($) (e)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(f)
  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option
Awards
($/Share) (g)
  Grant Date Fair
Value Awards
of Stock &
Options
($) (h)
 

Ray Leonard

    6/29/2012     6/29/2012                       363,000   $ 0.84   $ 223,938  

Paul Reinbolt

    8/8/2011     8/8/2011                       800,000     3.24     1,835,753  

Paul Reinbolt

    6/29/2012     6/29/2012                       96,665     0.84     59,633  

Jason Davis

    1/30/2012     1/30/2012                       5,000     2.52     4,888  

Jason Davis

    6/29/2012     6/29/2012                       70,000     0.84     43,184  

Michael Palmer

    6/29/2012     6/29/2012                       67,650     0.84     41,734  

David Wesson

    1/30/2012     1/30/2012                       5,000     2.52     4,888  

David Wesson

    6/29/2012     6/29/2012                       55,000     0.84     33,930  

44


Table of Contents


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2012 FISCAL YEAR-END

Name
   (a)
  No. of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)(b) (3)
  No. of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)(c)
  Option
Exercise Price
($/Share) (d)
  Option
Expiration
Date
(e)
  No. of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(f)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(g)
 

Ray Leonard

    1,360,833     1,739,167     0.49     7/22/2014          

Ray Leonard

        363,000     0.84     6/29/2017          

Paul Reinbolt

    200,000     600,000     3.24     8/8/2016          

Paul Reinbolt

        96,665     0.84     6/29/2017          

Jason Davis

    107,226     53,774     1.61     10/9/2014          

Jason Davis

    100,000         0.90     1/8/2015          

Jason Davis

    10,000     10,000     5.03     2/15/2021          

Jason Davis

    40,000     40,000     4.30     6/30/2021          

Jason Davis

        5,000     2.52     1/30/2017          

Jason Davis

        70,000     0.84     6/29/2017          

Michael Palmer

    66,667     66,666     1.06     5/17/2020          

Michael Palmer

    12,500     12,500     3.96     5/18/2021          

Michael Palmer

    47,500     47,500     4.30     6/30/2021          

Michael Palmer

        67,500     0.84     6/29/2017          

David Wesson

    60,000     30,000     1.29     4/5/2020          

David Wesson

    5,000     5,000     3.08     12/3/2020          

David Wesson

    22,500     22,500     4.30     6/30/2021          

David Wesson

        5,000     2.52     1/30/2017          

David Wesson

        55,000     0.84     6/29/2017          


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2012

Name
   (a)
  No. of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
  Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
  No. of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
  Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
 

Michael Palmer(1)

    66,667     282,668          

Ray Leonard(2)

    400,000     1,260,000          

Jason Davis(3)

    45,000     18,900              

Herman Cohen(4)

    30,000     130,800              

(1)
Mr. Palmer exercised 66,667 options on July 29, 2011.

(2)
Mr. Leonard exercised 220,000 options on July 1, 2011; 100,000 options on August 10, 2011; 40,000 options on December 28, 2011; and 40,000 options on May 14, 2012.

(3)
Mr. Davis exercised 45,000 options on June 29, 2012.

(4)
Mr. Cohen exercised 30,000 options on July 22, 2011.

Agreements with Current Executives and Officers

        Paul Reinbolt, our Chief Financial Officer, entered into an employment agreement effective August 8, 2011. This agreement has a three year term. He will receive an annual base salary of $250,000, which increased to $275,000 after the completion of six months of employment. Mr. Reinbolt's base salary increased to $300,000 effective July 1, 2012. He also will be eligible for annual adjustments in the form of increases to his base salary. In addition to his base salary, he will

45


Table of Contents

receive a cash award opportunity with a target amount of 50% of his base salary and maximum amount of 100% of the base salary, subject to such other terms, conditions and restrictions as may be established by our board of directors or compensation committee. He will receive stock options in an amount equal to 50% of the number of dollars of the cash award. In other words, if the cash award is $200,000, he will receive an award of 100,000 incentive stock options. The stock options will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant, with one-third of these options vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant, and expiring five years after issuance and otherwise governed by the terms of our stock plan under which they were granted. On June 25, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized, effective July 1, 2012, an increase in the maximum amount of his annual cash bonus to 150% of his base salary.

        Effective August 8, 2011, an award of an option to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") was made to Mr. Reinbolt at an exercise price of $3.24, with 50% of the amount vesting on the first day of the month occurring one year thereafter, and the remaining 50% of the amount vesting on the first day of the month occurring two years thereafter. The options have a five year term. Of this 400,000 share option grant, options to purchase 200,000 shares will immediately vest if we terminate his employment without cause, which solely for purposes of that provision includes financial impropriety or an intentional act materially injuring us. On August 8, 2011, an award of an option to purchase an additional 400,000 shares of our common stock under our Plan was made to Mr. Reinbolt at an exercise price of $3.24, with 50% of these options vesting if and when our stock price closes at $9 per share for five consecutive trading days, and with the remaining 50% vesting if and when our stock price reaches a closing price of $12 per share for five consecutive trading days. These options have a five year term.

        The Employment Agreement with Mr. Reinbolt may be earlier terminated by us in the event of his death or inability to perform, or for cause, including material breach of his duties. Mr. Reinbolt may terminate the Employment Agreement for good reason, including a material reduction in his reporting responsibilities or a change of more than 75 miles in the location of his principal place of employment. Either we or Mr. Reinbolt may terminate the Employment Agreement without cause or without good reason. If we terminate Mr. Reinbolt without cause, or if Mr. Reinbolt terminates for good reason, then Mr. Reinbolt will be entitled to receive one year's base salary, his bonus award at the target level for the performance period in effect on the employment termination date, and full vesting of all stock option and restricted stock awards held by him with a twelve month period to exercise (or the expiration of the award term, if that occurs sooner).

        If Mr. Reinbolt's employment is terminated during the two year period following a change of control for any reason other than death, inability to perform, or cause, or by him for good reason, and our stock price is above $9.00 per share, then he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum amount equivalent to one year's base salary plus his bonus award at the target level for the performance period in effect on the employment termination date, and he will have full vesting of all stock option and restricted stock awards held by him with a twelve month period to exercise (or the expiration of the award term, if that occurs sooner). The lump sum payment is to be made on the 60 th  business day after the employment termination date. If our stock price is between $7.50 and $9.00, then he will receive the payments and benefits stated above, but the cash payment will be reduced by 50%. Assuming a termination date of the last business date of the last business day of the fiscal year (June 29, 2012), for purposes of the above, our stock price on that date would equal $0.69 and thus, would not trigger a lump-sum payment. In addition to the foregoing payments and benefits related to a change in control, if Mr. Reinbolt chooses to continue coverage under our health plan in accordance with COBRA, then we will reimburse him during the 18 month period following termination for the difference between the total amount of the COBRA premiums for the same coverage as in effect on termination that are actually paid by him and the total monthly amount of the same premiums charged to active senior executives of ours for health insurance coverage. The Employment Agreement also includes provisions

46


Table of Contents

for safeguarding of our confidential information and non-solicitation activities during employment and for a two year period subsequent to termination.

        Jason Davis, our Vice President and Treasurer, entered into an employment agreement effective as of July 1, 2009. This agreement has a two-year term that is automatically extended for successive one-year periods following the end of the initial two-year term unless otherwise terminated by delivery of written notice by either party no less than two months prior to the first day of any one-year extension period. The agreement provides that Mr. Davis will serve as our Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. Mr. Davis subsequently assumed the position of Vice President of Finance in July, 2010. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Davis would receive an annual base salary of $185,000, which may be further increased at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. This annual base salary was increased to $200,000 effective January 1, 2010. Mr. Davis' salary could be paid $92,500 per year in cash plus $92,500 payable in common stock under a 10b5-1 plan. The Company has opted to pay all base salary in cash. Mr. Davis is also eligible to receive performance bonus(es) as determined and agreed to from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors. Mr. Davis will also be eligible to participate, in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, in any long-term incentive arrangements we make available to our executive officers from time to time. In connection with his hiring, we granted Mr. Davis an option to purchase 45,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.42 which immediately vested and expire three years after issuance. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Davis was eligible to receive quarterly option grant to purchase 23,000 shares of our common stock. On October 12, 2009, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to Mr. Davis' employment agreement that modified the foregoing quarterly option grant provisions under his employment agreement. Instead of making future quarterly option grants (following October 2009), the Board of Directors elected to grant Mr. Davis an option to purchase 161,000 shares of common stock. The option has an exercise price of $1.61, which was the closing price of our common stock on October 9, 2009 or the trading date immediately preceding the date of grant, a term for five years from the date of grant, and will vest 33% on the anniversary date during each of the three years following the grant date. Finally, Mr. Davis will receive certain perquisites, including reimbursement in accordance with our standard policies and procedures of business and business-related business expenses and dues and fees to industry and professional organizations, two weeks of paid vacation each calendar year, and participation by Mr. Davis and his spouse and dependents in all benefits, plans and programs available to our executive employees. This agreement expired on July 1, 2012.

        We entered into a three-year employment agreement with Ray Leonard, our current CEO, President and Director effective as of July 22, 2009, as amended, effective December 11, 2009. On September 10, 2012, effective as of July 23, 2012, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Leonard. The agreement, as amended and restated, has a one-year term that is automatically extended for successive one-year periods following the end of the initial one-year term unless otherwise terminated by delivery of written notice by either party prior to May 31 of each period. The agreement provides that Mr. Leonard will serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Leonard's current base salary is $400,000, which is subject to annual adjustments, at the discretion of the Board, but in no event shall the Company pay Mr. Leonard a base salary less than that set forth above, or any increased base salary later in effect, without the consent of Mr. Leonard.

        In connection with our hiring of Mr. Leonard in July 2009, we granted Mr. Leonard an option to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.49 which immediately vested. Mr. Leonard was also granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.49 that vest on a monthly basis over five years. Both of these options will expire five years after issuance.

47


Table of Contents

        In connection with the commencement of Mr. Leonard's employment in 2009, a stock option award was made, with trigger events of the following three cumulative net cash to us equity capital money raising transactions:

        When $8 million cumulative is raised, the award is 210,000 stock options.

        When $20 million cumulative is raised, the award is 390,000 stock options.

        When $30 million cumulative is raised, the award is 600,000 stock options.

        All awards vest 1 / 36 per month over a three-year period from the trigger event. These Performance Option-Grant Awards options have a five year life, and the exercise price is $0.49. All trigger events were satisfied.

        The 2009 stock option award also provided for trigger events based on achieving the following share price thresholds:

$2.00/share   90,000 stock options
$3.00/share   210,000 stock options
$5.00/share   600,000 stock options
$9.00/share   1,200,000 stock options

        All awards vest 1 / 36 per month over a three-year period from the trigger event. These Performance Option-Grant Awards options have a five year life, and the exercise price is $0.49. For awards related to the $2.00 and $3.00 share price, the stock option is earned if the closing price of the shares trade at or above the target price for 15 consecutive trading days. For awards related to the $5.00 and $9.00 share price, the stock option is earned if the closing price of the shares trade at or above the target price for 5 consecutive trading days. All trigger events were satisfied, except for the $9.00 share price.

        As part of the annual review of Mr. Leonard's performance, on June 29, 2012, we granted Mr. Leonard five-year options to purchase 363,000 shares of our common stock at $.84 per share based on the market value on the stock on the date of grant. The options vest in equal amounts over a three-year period.

        Beginning with the effective date of the amended employment agreement, Mr. Leonard will participate in any incentive compensation plan ("ICP") applicable to Mr. Leonard's position, as may be adopted by us from time to time and in accordance with the terms of such plan(s). Mr. Leonard's cash target award opportunity under the ICP will be 100% of his base salary with a threshold of 50% and a 200% maximum, and shall be subject to such other terms, conditions and restrictions as may be established by the Board or the Compensation Committee. He also will receive stock options in an amount equal to 50% of the number of dollars of the cash award. In other words, if the cash award is $200,000, he will receive an amount of options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock. The stock options will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, with one-third of these options vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant, and expiring five years after issuance. Annually, Mr. Leonard will develop a proposed set of current year performance metrics that are subject to review and approval by the Board and/or the Compensation Committee. Since the inception of Mr. Leonard's employment, the metrics for his bonus award have been based on annual objectives related to advancing the exploration of our Guinea Concession and/or achieving funding from equity capital raises or participation in the Concession or stock price appreciation.

        Finally, Mr. Leonard will receive certain perquisites, including reimbursement in accordance with our standard policies and procedures of business and business-related business expenses and dues and fees to industry and professional organizations, four weeks of paid vacation each calendar year, and

48


Table of Contents

participation by Mr. Leonard and his spouse and dependents in all benefits, plans and programs available to our executive employees.

        The Employment Agreement with Mr. Leonard may be earlier terminated by us in the event of his death or inability to perform, or for cause, including material breach of his duties involving fraud. Mr. Leonard may terminate the Employment Agreement for good reason, including a material reduction in his reporting responsibilities or a change of more than 75 miles in the location of his principal place of employment. Either we or Mr. Leonard may terminate the Employment Agreement without cause or without good reason. If we terminate Mr. Leonard without cause, or if Mr. Leonard terminates for good reason, or upon expiration of the employment term due to our notice to terminate, then Mr. Leonard will be entitled to receive one year's base salary, his bonus award at the target level for the performance period in effect on the employment termination date, and full vesting of all stock option and restricted stock awards held by him with a twelve month period to exercise (or the expiration of the award term, if that occurs sooner).

49


Table of Contents

Current Director Compensation

        The following table describes the current compensation arrangements in effect for independent directors for the next fiscal year.

Director
  Quarterly
fees
  Options  

Robert Solberg

  $ 19,500     60,000 (1)

William Strange

  $ 19,000     60,000 (1)

Herman Cohen

  $ 17,500     60,000 (1)

Lord David Owen

  $ 15,000     60,000 (1)

Fred Zeidman

  $ 16,500     60,000 (1)

(1)
60,000 options to purchase common stock were granted on July 2, 2012 that will vest 50% on July 2, 2013 and 50% on July 2, 2014.


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name
  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 

Ray Leonard(1)

                     

Robert A. Solberg

    78,000         122,755 (2)       200,755  

William O. Strange

    76,000         122,755 (3)       198,755  

Fred Zeidman

    66,000         122,755 (4)       188,755  

Lord David Owen

    60,000         122,755 (5)       182,755  

Herman Cohen

    70,000         122,755 (6)       192,755  

(1)
We do not provide additional compensation to employees that also serve as directors for their service on the Board of Directors. All compensation paid to Mr. Leonard is reflected above in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)
During the year ended June 30, 2012, Mr. Solberg received five year options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The options vest 50% on July 7, 2012 and 50% on July 7, 2013 and have an exercise price of $4.21 based on the market value of the stock on the date of grant.

(3)
During the year ended June 30, 2012, Mr. Strange received five year options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The options vest 50% on July 7, 2012 and 50% on July 7, 2013 and have an exercise price of $4.21 based on the market value of the stock on the date of grant.

(4)
During the year ended June 30, 2012, Mr. Zeidman received five year options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The options vest 50% on July 7, 2012 and 50% on July 7, 2013 and have an exercise price of $4.21 based on the market value of the stock on the date of grant.

(5)
During the year ended June 30, 2012,Lord Owen received five year options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The options vest 50% on July 7, 2012 and 50% on July 7, 2013 and have an exercise price of $4.21 based on the market value of the stock on the date of grant.

(6)
During the year ended June 30, 2012, Mr. Cohen received five year options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The options vest 50% on July 7, 2012 and 50% on July 7, 2013 and have an exercise price of $4.21 based on the market value of the stock on the date of grant.

        In connection with the commencement of Ray Leonard's employment with us as our Chief Executive Officer and President in July 2009, as more fully described above in "Agreements with Executives and Officers," on July 22, 2009, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Leonard to serve as

50


Table of Contents

a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Leonard does not receive compensation for service on our Board of Directors in addition to his compensation as Chief Executive Officer and President.

        On June 30, 2011, the Board of Directors modified the structure by which we compensate our independent directors for service as members of our Board. Each of our independent directors will be compensated for his service on our Board of Directors under the structure below The new compensation arrangements which became effective July 1, 2011, consist of the following:

    Cash compensation consisting of quarterly payments, as applicable, of: (i) $11,000 for services as a director, (ii) $5,000 for service as the chairman of the Audit Committee and Government Relations Committee, (iii) $2,500 for service as a member of the Audit Committee or Government Relations Committee, (iv) $1,500 for service as a member of the Compensation Committee or Nomination Committee, and (v) $3,000 for service as the chairman of the Compensation Committee and Nomination Committee.

    An annual grant, pursuant to a stock incentive plan, of options to purchase shares of our common stock. The options are to be granted on or about July 1st of each year, have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the day prior to the grant date, vest 50% on the first anniversary of the grant date and vest the remaining 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date. The options will have a 5 year term.

Director Option Grants

        On July 7, 2011, the Board made the annual grant (referenced above) of options to our directors as reflected in the table below. The grants were made pursuant to the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Each option has an exercise price of $4.21, which was the closing price of our common stock on July 7, 2011 or the trading date immediately preceding the date of grant, a term for five years from the date of grant, and vest 50% on July 7, 2012 and 50% on July 7, 2013. The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options granted to each of our independent directors on July 7, 2011:

Name of Director
  Shares of
Common Stock
Underlying
Options
 

Robert A. Solberg

    40,000  

William O. Strange

    40,000  

Fred Zeidman

    40,000  

Herman Cohen

    40,000  

Hon. Lord David Owen

    40,000  

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Solberg, Strange and Zeidman, all of whom are considered to be independent. No executive officer of Hyperdynamics served as a member of the board of directors of any other public company during the year ended June 30, 2012. No member of the Compensation Committee serves as an executive officer of any other public company during the year ended June 30, 2012. No interlocking relationship exists between the members of our Compensation Committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company.

Compensation Committee Report

        The Compensation Committee, consisting of Messrs. Solberg, Strange and Zeidman, is responsible for establishing and administering the executive compensation programs of Hyperdynamics. The Compensation Committee of Hyperdynamics has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion

51


Table of Contents

and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

/s/ Robert Solberg
/s/ William Strange
/s/ Fred Zeidman

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table gives aggregate information under all equity compensation plans of Hyperdynamics as of June 30, 2012.


Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category
  Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
  Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (A))
 
 
  A
  B
  C
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

    12,495,316     2.09     2,044,019  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

             
               

Total

    12,495,316     2.09     2,044,019  
               

        The Stock and Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan") of Hyperdynamics was adopted May 7, 1997 and amended on December 3, 2001, on January 21, 2005, and on February 20, 2008. The total number of shares authorized under the Plan, as amended, was 14,000,000. The Board terminated the 1997 Plan effective upon stockholder approval of the 2010 Equity incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan").

        Shareholders approved the adoption of the 2008 Restricted Stock Award Plan (the "2008 Plan") at Hyperdynamics' Annual Meeting on February 20, 2008. The total number of shares authorized under the 2008 Plan was 3,000,000. The Board terminated the 2008 Plan effective upon stockholder approval of the 2010 Plan.

        On February 18, 2010, at our annual meeting of stockholders, the board of directors and stockholders approved the 2010 Plan (the "2010 Plan"). The 2010 Plan provides for the grants of shares of common stock or incentive stock options and/or nonqualified stock options to purchase our common stock or restricted stock to selected employees, directors, officers, agents, consultants, attorneys, vendors and advisors of ours' or of any parent or subsidiary thereof. Shares of common stock, options, or restricted stock can only be granted under this plan within 10 years from the effective date of February 18, 2010. The 2010 Plan was amended to increase issuable shares from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 on February 17, 2012.

52


Table of Contents

        The purpose of the Plans are to further our interest, and the interest of our subsidiaries and our stockholders by providing incentives in the form of stock or stock options to key employees, consultants, directors, and vendors who contribute materially to our success and profitability. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel as employees, independent consultants, and attorneys. The issuance of stock and grants of options and warrants will recognize and reward outstanding individual performances and contributions and will give such persons a proprietary interest in us, thus enhancing their personal interest in our continued success and progress. We pay wages, salaries, and consulting rates that we believe are competitive. We use the 2010 Plan to augment our compensation packages.

        The following table provides a reconciliation of the securities remaining available for issuance as of June 30, 2012 under the Plans.

 
  2010 Plan  

Shares available for issuance, June 30, 2011

    1,069,480  

Increase in shares issuable

    5,000,000  

Stock options issued

    (4,273,461 )

Previously issued shares cancelled or expired

    248,000  

Plan termination of remaining unissued shares

     
       

Shares available for issuance, June 30, 2012

    2,044,019  
       

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management

        The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by (1) each person known to us that owns beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (2) each of our Directors, (3) each of our Executive Officers, and (4) all of our Executive Officers and Directors as a group. At September 6, 2012, we had 167,425,232 shares of common stock outstanding. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person or group and the percentage ownership of that person or group, shares of our Common Stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after September 6, 2012 are deemed outstanding, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The address of each Director and Executive Officer

53


Table of Contents

named in the below table is c/o Hyperdynamics Corporation, 12012 Wickchester Lane, Suite 475 Houston, TX 77079.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
  Percent
of Class
 

BlackRock, Inc. 

    23,790,837 (1)   14.2 %

Vanguard Group Inc. 

    9,295,529 (2)   5.6 %

Ray Leonard

    1,943,167 (3)   1.2 %

Robert A. Solberg

    684,600 (4)   *  

Lord David Owen

    565,400 (5)   *  

Herman Cohen

    151,000 (6)   *  

Fred Zeidman

    137,000 (7)   *  

William O. Strange

    78,000 (8)   *  

Jason Davis

    356,000 (9)   *  

Michael Palmer

    256,134 (10)   *  

Paul Reinbolt

    230,000 (11)   *  

David Wesson

    101,000 (12)   *  

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (10 persons)

    4,502,301     2.7 %

*
Less than 1%

(1)
Based on the total of Schedules 13F filed for the period ended June 30, 2012. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(2)
Based on the total of Schedules 13F filed for the period ended June 30, 2012. The address of Vanguard Group Inc. is 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355-2331

(3)
This amount includes: 499,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 1,444,167 shares of common stock

(4)
This amount includes: 246,600 shares of common stock and options to purchase 438,000 shares of common stock.

(5)
This amount includes: 395,400 shares of common stock and options to purchase 170,000 shares of common stock.

(6)
This amount includes: 41,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 110,000 shares of common stock.

(7)
This amount includes: 11,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 126,000 shares of common stock.

(8)
This amount includes: 33,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 45,000 shares of common stock.

(9)
This amount includes: 45,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 311,000 shares of common stock.

(10)
This amount includes: 129,467 shares of common stock and options to purchase 126,667 shares of common stock.

(11)
This amount includes: 30,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock.

(12)
This amount includes: 13,500 shares of common stock and options to purchase 87,500 shares of common stock.

54


Table of Contents

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

        We have a written conflict of interest policy governing transactions involving related parties. In accordance with the policy, transactions involving related parties must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which is comprised of independent directors.

        We did not enter into any transactions involving amounts in excess of $120,000, excluding employment relationships, with related parties since July 1, 2010, the beginning of the last fiscal year.

Series B Preferred Stock

        On September 29, 2009, subsequent to fiscal year 2009, we entered into an agreement (the "Series B Agreement") with the holders of all of our Series B preferred stock in which the Series B holders (i) converted all of their shares of Series B preferred stock into approximately 15,822,222 shares of common stock, (ii) agreed to the cancellation of warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock, (iii) agreed to donate, pursuant to a specified schedule, 2,000,000 shares of common stock, issued upon conversion of the Series B preferred stock, and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock, to the American Friends of Guinea, a charitable organization that provides support to the people of Guinea, and (iv) agreed to be subject to a nine month lock-up of the 15,822,222 shares of common stock received in connection with the conversion of the Series B preferred stock, and any shares that may be received upon exercise of their warrants. The common stock received upon conversion represented a reduction of 2,000,000 shares that otherwise would have been issuable under the original terms of the Series B preferred stock.

        Under the terms of the Series B Agreement, if we complete an equity or debt financing in the future of $10,000,000 or more, we also agreed to (i) pay a previously owed dividend in the aggregate amount of approximately $430,000 to the Series B holders and (ii) subject to market conditions, release from the lock-up provision described above, up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock received in connection with the Series B preferred stock conversion in order to allow for resale by the Series B holders.

Director Independence

        Our common stock is listed on the NYSE. We use SEC Rule 10A-3 and the NYSE definition of Independent Director in determining whether a Director is independent in the capacity of Director and in the capacity as a member of a board committee. In determining Director independence, we have not relied on any exemptions from any rule's definition of independence. In addition to the requirements of SEC Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the NYSE rules provide that "Independent Director" means a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company.

        Directors serving on our audit committee must also comply with additional NYSE requirements as follows:

        (a)   The Director must not have participated in the preparation of our financial statements or any current subsidiary at any time during the past three years; and

        (b)   The Director is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including our balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.

        We currently have a total of six directors, five of whom are Independent Directors. Our Independent Directors are: Fred Zeidman, William O. Strange, Robert A. Solberg, Herman Cohen and Lord David Owen.

55


Table of Contents


Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 
  Years ended June 30,  
 
  2012   2011  

Audit Fees(1)

  $ 546,030   $ 293,965  

Audit-related fees(2)

    44,400     21,315  

All other fees(3)

    309,000      
           

Total

    899,430     315,280  
           

(1)
Fiscal 2012 audit fees were billed to us by our current Certifying Accountant: Deloitte & Touche LLP, for professional services related to their audit of our annual financial statements in our Form 10K, Sarbanes-Oxley 404 attest services, reviews of our unaudited quarterly financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs and registration statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Included in fiscal 2012 audit fees are $50,000 in fees attributable to incremental time and expenses associated with the fiscal 2011 audit.

Fiscal 2011 Audit fees include $163,965 billed to us by former Certifying Accountant: GBH CPAs, PC for professional services related to their reviews of our unaudited quarterly financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs and registration statements, and $130,000 billed to us by our current Certifying Accountant: Deloitte & Touche LLP, for professional services related to their audit of our annual financial statements in our Form 10K and Sarbanes-Oxley 404 attest services.

(2)
Fiscal 2012 audit related fees include $15,400 billed to us by our former Certifying Accountant: GBH CPAs, PC and $29,000 billed to us by our current Certifying Accountant: Deloitte & Touche LLP, for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of audit or review of the Company's financial statements.

Fiscal 2011 audit related fees include $21,315 billed to us by our former Certifying Accountant: GBH CPAs, PC for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of audit or review of the Company's financial statements.

(3)
Our current Certifying Accountant: Deloitte & Touche LLP, billed us $309,000 for professional services rendered for all other services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. These fees pertained to due diligence performed on a prospective investment.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval

        Our Audit Committee Charter provides that either (i) the Audit Committee shall pre-approve all auditing and non-auditing services of the independent auditor, subject to deminimus exceptions for other than audit, review or attest services that are approved by the Audit Committee prior to completion of the audit; or (ii) the engagement of the independent auditor be entered into pursuant to pre-approved policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee, provided that the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular services and the Audit Committee is informed of each service. The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of GBH CPAs, PC and Deloitte & Touche LLP fees, respectively, for audit services in year 2012 and 2011. Except as indicated above, there were no fees other than audit fees for years 2012 and 2011, and the auditors engaged performed all the services described above with their full time permanent employees.

56


Table of Contents


PART IV

Item 15    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(A)

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  3.1.1   Certificate of Incorporation(1)

 

3.1.2

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated January 21, 1997(1)

 

3.1.3

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated September 20, 1999(1)

 

3.1.4

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated December 22, 2003(1)

 

3.1.5

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated March 11, 2011(2)

 

3.1.6

 

Series B Certificate of Designation(5)

 

3.2

 

Amended and Restated By-laws(23)

 

4.1

 

Form of Common Stock Certificate(3)

 

4.2

 

Warrant issued to Trendsetter Investors, LLC on June 12, 2007(4)

 

4.3

 

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors on February 2, 2012(26)

 

10.1

 

Hydrocarbon Production Sharing Contract (PSA) between SCS Corporation and the Republic of Guinea, dated September 22, 2006(6)

 

10.2

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Hydrocarbons Production Sharing Contract between SCS Corporation and the Republic of Guinea, dated March 25, 2010(11)

 

10.3

*

Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics and Jason D. Davis, dated June 17, 2009(8)

 

10.4

*

Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Jason D. Davis, dated October 16, 2009(20)

 

10.5

**

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics and Ray Leonard, effective as of July 23, 2012.

 

10.6

 

Intentionally omitted

 

10.7

 

Sale and Purchase Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, effective as of December 4, 2009(12)

 

10.8

 

Letter Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, dated December 2, 2009(12)

 

10.9

 

Operating Agreement between SCS Corporation and Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, dated January 28, 2010(16)

 

10.10

 

Lease Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Parkway Properties LP, dated December 29, 2009(17)

 

10.11

 

Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Guinea and SCS Corporation, dated September 11, 2009 (English translation)(7)

 

10.14

 

Marine 2D Seismic Data Acquisition Services Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Bergen Oilfield Services AS of Norway, dated September 29, 2009(18)

57


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.15   3D Seismic Contract between PGS Geophysical AS, Norway and Hyperdynamics Corporation, dated June 11, 2010(21)

 

10.17

**

2010 Equity Incentive Plan as amended

 

10.18

*

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement(10)

 

10.19

*

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement(10)

 

10.20

*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement(10)

 

10.21

 

Master Service Agreement for Geophysical Data Processing Services between SCS Corporation and PGS Data Processing, Inc., dated July 2, 2010(21)

 

10.22

 

Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Master Service Agreement between SCS Corporation and PGS Data Processing, Inc., dated July 2, 2010(21)

 

10.23

 

Form of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 3, 2010 among Hyperdynamics Corporation and the Investors(22)

 

10.24

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 3, 2010 among Hyperdynamics Corporation and the Investors(22)

 

10.25

 

Contract Number: AGR/C105/10 between SCS Corporation and AGR Peak Well Management Limited for Provision of Well Construction Management Services, including LOGIC General Conditions as Appendix I(13)

 

10.26

 

Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics and Paul C. Reinbolt effective August 8, 2011(24)

 

10.27

 

Agreement for the Supply of Marine Seismic Data Application and Processing Services, dated September 20, 2011 between SCS Corporation and CGG Veritas Services SA(25)

 

10.28

 

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 30, 2012, between Hyperdynamics Corporation and investors in the offering(26)

 

10.29

 

Placement Agency Agreement, dated January 30, 2012, by and between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC(26)

 

14.1

 

Code of Ethics(1)

 

16.1

 

Letter from GBH CPAs, PC regarding the change in certifying accountant,(27)

 

21.1

**

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

23.1

**

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

23.2

**

Consent of GBH CPAs, PC

 

31.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

31.2

**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

32.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

58


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  32.2 ** Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document(28)

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(28)

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document(28)

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document(28)

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document(28)

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document(28)

*
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

**
Filed herewith.

(1)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-KSB/A filed May 16, 2005.

(2)
Incorporated by reference to Schedule 14A filed January 11, 2011 and filed herewith.

(3)
Incorporated by reference to Form S-1 filed January 12, 2006, as amended.

(4)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed June 18, 2007.

(5)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed June 15, 2001.

(6)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed September 28, 2006.

(7)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed September 15, 2009.

(8)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed July 6, 2009.

(9)
Intentionally omitted.

(10)
Incorporated by reference to Form S-8 filed June 14, 2010.

(11)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, dated March 31, 2010.

(12)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed December 7, 2009.

(13)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed December 6, 2010.

(14)
Intentionally omitted.

(15)
Intentionally omitted.

(16)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, dated January 29, 2010.

(17)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, dated January 6, 2010.

(18)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed October 2, 2009.

(19)
Intentionally omitted.

(20)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2009.

(21)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed on September 28, 2010.

(22)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2010.

59


Table of Contents

(23)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011.

(24)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2011.

(25)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011

(26)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2012.

(27)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2011.

(28)
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

(B)

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

        The financial statement schedules required by this item are set forth in the notes to our financial statements set forth on page 32 and F-1.

60


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ RAY LEONARD


Ray Leonard
President, CEO and Director
   

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

September 11, 2012

  /s/ ROBERT A. SOLBERG

Robert A. Solberg
Non-Executive Chairman and Director
   

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ RAY LEONARD


Ray Leonard
President, CEO and Director
   

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ WILLIAM STRANGE


William Strange
Director
   

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ FRED ZEIDMAN


Fred Zeidman
Director
   

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ DAVID OWEN


David Owen
Director
   

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ HERMAN COHEN


Herman Cohen
Director
   

61


Table of Contents

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ PAUL REINBOLT


Paul Reinbolt
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   

September 11, 2012

 

/s/ DAVID WESSON


David Wesson
Principal Accounting Officer
   

62


Table of Contents


Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  3.1.1   Certificate of Incorporation(1)

 

3.1.2

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated January 21, 1997(1)

 

3.1.3

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated September 20, 1999(1)

 

3.1.4

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated December 22, 2003(1)

 

3.1.5

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated March 11, 2011(2)

 

3.1.6

 

Series B Certificate of Designation(5)

 

3.2

 

Amended and Restated By-laws(23)

 

4.1

 

Form of Common Stock Certificate(3)

 

4.2

 

Warrant issued to Trendsetter Investors, LLC on June 12, 2007(4)

 

4.3

 

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors on February 2, 2012(26)

 

10.1

 

Hydrocarbon Production Sharing Contract (PSA) between SCS Corporation and the Republic of Guinea, dated September 22, 2006(6)

 

10.2

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Hydrocarbons Production Sharing Contract between SCS Corporation and the Republic of Guinea, dated March 25, 2010(11)

 

10.3

*

Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics and Jason D. Davis, dated June 17, 2009(8)

 

10.4

*

Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Jason D. Davis, dated October 16, 2009(20)

 

10.5

**

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics and Ray Leonard, effective as of July 23, 2012.

 

10.6

 

Intentionally omitted

 

10.7

 

Sale and Purchase Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, effective as of December 4, 2009(12)

 

10.8

 

Letter Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, dated December 2, 2009(12)

 

10.9

 

Operating Agreement between SCS Corporation and Dana Petroleum (E&P) Limited, dated January 28, 2010(16)

 

10.10

 

Lease Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Parkway Properties LP, dated December 29, 2009(17)

 

10.11

 

Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Guinea and SCS Corporation, dated September 11, 2009 (English translation)(7)

 

10.14

 

Marine 2D Seismic Data Acquisition Services Agreement between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Bergen Oilfield Services AS of Norway, dated September 29, 2009(18)

 

10.15

 

3D Seismic Contract between PGS Geophysical AS, Norway and Hyperdynamics Corporation, dated June 11, 2010(21)

 

10.17

**

2010 Equity Incentive Plan as amended

63


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.18 * Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement(10)

 

10.19

*

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement(10)

 

10.20

*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement(10)

 

10.21

 

Master Service Agreement for Geophysical Data Processing Services between SCS Corporation and PGS Data Processing, Inc., dated July 2, 2010(21)

 

10.22

 

Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Master Service Agreement between SCS Corporation and PGS Data Processing, Inc., dated July 2, 2010(21)

 

10.23

 

Form of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 3, 2010 among Hyperdynamics Corporation and the Investors(22)

 

10.24

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 3, 2010 among Hyperdynamics Corporation and the Investors(22)

 

10.25

 

Contract Number: AGR/C105/10 between SCS Corporation and AGR Peak Well Management Limited for Provision of Well Construction Management Services, including LOGIC General Conditions as Appendix I(13)

 

10.26

 

Employment Agreement between Hyperdynamics and Paul C. Reinbolt effective August 8, 2011(24)

 

10.27

 

Agreement for the Supply of Marine Seismic Data Application and Processing Services, dated September 20, 2011 between SCS Corporation and CGG Veritas Services SA(25)

 

10.28

 

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 30, 2012, between Hyperdynamics Corporation and investors in the offering(26)

 

10.29

 

Placement Agency Agreement, dated January 30, 2012, by and between Hyperdynamics Corporation and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC(26)

 

14.1

 

Code of Ethics(1)

 

16.1

 

Letter from GBH CPAs, PC regarding the change in certifying accountant,(27)

 

21.1

**

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

23.1

**

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

23.2

**

Consent of GBH CPAs, PC

 

31.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

31.2

**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

32.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

32.2

**

Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

64


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  101.INS   XBRL Instance Document(28)

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(28)

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document(28)

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document(28)

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document(28)

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document(28)

*
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

**
Filed herewith.

(1)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-KSB/A filed May 16, 2005.

(2)
Incorporated by reference to Schedule 14A filed January 11, 2011 and filed herewith.

(3)
Incorporated by reference to Form S-1 filed January 12, 2006, as amended.

(4)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed June 18, 2007.

(5)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed June 15, 2001.

(6)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed September 28, 2006.

(7)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed September 15, 2009.

(8)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed July 6, 2009.

(9)
Intentionally omitted.

(10)
Incorporated by reference to Form S-8 filed June 14, 2010.

(11)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, dated March 31, 2010.

(12)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed December 7, 2009.

(13)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed December 6, 2010.

(14)
Intentionally omitted.

(15)
Intentionally omitted.

(16)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, dated January 29, 2010.

(17)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, dated January 6, 2010.

(18)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed October 2, 2009.

(19)
Intentionally Omitted.

(20)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2009.

(21)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed on September 28, 2010.

(22)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2010.

(23)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011.

(24)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2011.

(25)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011

65


Table of Contents

(26)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2012.

(27)
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2011.

(28)
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

66




Exhibit 10.5

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this “ Agreement ”), effective as of July 23, 2012 (the “ Effective Date ”), is between Hyperdynamics Corporation (“ Employer ”), and Ray Leonard (“ Executive ”) (each a “ Party ” and together the “ Parties ”).

 

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, effective July 22, 2009 (together with all amendments thereto the “ 2009 Employment Agreement ”),

 

WHEREAS, Employer wishes to continue to employ Executive as its President, Chief Executive Officer, and Member of the Board of Directors, and Executive wishes to continue such employment; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend and restate the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment as set forth in the 2009 Employment Agreement by entering into this Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.                                        Definitions .  As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings:

 

(a)                                   “Affiliate” means, with respect to any entity, any other corporation, organization, association, partnership, sole proprietorship or other type of entity, whether incorporated or unincorporated, directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such entity.

 

(b)                                  “Annual Period” means the time period of each year beginning on the first day of the Employment Term and ending on the day before the anniversary of that date.

 

(c)                                   “Board” means the Board of Directors of Employer.

 

(d)                                  “Cause” means a finding by the Board of acts or omissions constituting, in the Board’s reasonable judgment, any of the following occurring during the Employment Term:

 

(i)            a material breach of duty by Executive in the course of his employment with Employer or its Affiliates involving fraud, acts of dishonesty (other than inadvertent acts or omissions), disloyalty to Employer or its Affiliates or moral turpitude constituting criminal felony;

 

(ii)           conduct by Executive that is materially detrimental to Employer or its Affiliates, monetarily or otherwise, or that reflects unfavorably on Employer or Executive to such an extent that Employer or its Affiliates have been materially harmed or would be materially harmed if Executive’s employment were not terminated;

 



 

(iii)          acts or omissions of Executive that are materially in violation of his obligations under this Agreement or at law and that have a material adverse effect on Employer or its Affiliates;

 

(iv)          Executive’s material failure to comply with or enforce the personnel policies of Employer or its Affiliates, specifically including those concerning equal employment opportunity and those related to harassing conduct;

 

(v)           Executive’s material insubordination to the Board;

 

(vi)          subject to the details of Paragraph 4(b), Executive’s failure to devote his full working time and best efforts to the performance of his responsibilities to Employer or its Affiliates;

 

(vii)         Executive’s conviction of, or entry of a plea agreement or consent decree or similar arrangement with respect to a felony or any material violation of federal or state securities laws, in either case, having a material adverse effect on Employer or its Affiliates; or

 

(viii)        Executive’s material failure to cooperate with any investigation or inquiry authorized by the Board or conducted by a governmental authority related to Employer’s or an Affiliate’s business or Executive’s conduct related to Employer or an Affiliate.

 

(e)                                   “Competitor” means any person or entity that is engaged in the acquisition, development, production and marketing of crude oil and natural gas, chemicals and other hydrocarbon commodities in competition with the activities of Employer or an Affiliate.

 

(f)                                     “Confidential Information” means, without limitation, all documents or information, in whatever form or medium, concerning or evidencing seismic data, geological data; geophysical data; energy exploration data; oil and gas production data; sales; costs; pricing; strategies; forecasts and long range plans; financial and tax information; personnel information; business, marketing and operational projections, plans and opportunities; customer, vendor, and supplier information; project and prospect locations and leads; and production information; but excluding any such information that is or becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of any breach of this Agreement or other unauthorized disclosure by Executive.

 

(g)                                  “Employment Termination Date” means the effective date of termination of Executive’s employment as established under Paragraph 6(g).

 

(h)                                  “Good Reason” means, with respect to Executive, any of the following actions or failures to act:

 

(i)            a material diminution in Executive’s authority, duties, or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to the effective date of such change, but excluding any such change that occurs in connection with Executive’s death, Inability to Perform or retirement;

 

2



 

(ii)           a material reduction by the Employer of Executive’s compensation in effect immediately prior to the effective date of such reduction;

 

(iii)          any change of more than 75 miles in the location of Executive’s principal place of employment immediately prior to the effective date of such change; or

 

(iv)          any material breach by the Employer of this Agreement.

 

(i)                                      “Inability to Perform” means and shall be deemed to have occurred if Executive has been determined under Employer’s long-term disability plan, if any,  to be eligible for long-term disability benefits.  In the absence of Executive’s participation in, application for benefits under, or existence of such a plan, “Inability to Perform” means Executive’s inability to perform the essential functions of his position with the Employer because of an illness or injury for (i) a period of six-consecutive months or (ii) an aggregate of six months within any period of 12-consecutive months.

 

(j)                                      “Work Product” means all ideas, works of authorship, inventions, and other creations, whether or not patentable, copyrightable, or subject to other intellectual-property protection, that are made, conceived, developed or worked on in whole or in part by Executive while employed by Employer and/or any of its Affiliates, that relate in any manner whatsoever to the business, existing or then-proposed, of Employer and/or any of its Affiliates, or any other business or research or development effort in which Employer and/or any of its Affiliates engages during Executive’s employment.

 

2.                                        Employment .  Employer agrees to employ Executive (directly or through an Affiliate), and Executive agrees to be employed, for the Employment Term set forth in Paragraph 3.  Executive will be employed in the position and with the duties and responsibilities set forth in Paragraph 4(a) and upon the other terms and conditions set out in this Agreement.  Employer and Executive agree that such employment may be through a co-employment relationship with a professional employer organization, subject to the requirements of Paragraph 4(a).  Executive represents, covenants and warranties that his employment by the Employer does not and will not breach agreements that the Executive may have entered into with other companies.  For the avoidance of doubt, the Executive represents, covenants and warranties that his employment by the Employer will not breach any confidentiality agreements, non-competition agreements or non-solicitation agreements that the Executive may have entered into with others.

 

3.                                        Term .  Executive’s employment under this Agreement shall continue from the Effective Date for a term of one year (the “ Employment Term ”), unless sooner terminated as provided in this Agreement.  The Employment Term shall be extended automatically for an additional one-year period as of the last day of the initial Annual Period and each successive Annual Period thereafter on which the Executive remains employed by Employer; provided, however, that if, prior to May 31 during any such Annual Period, either party shall give written notice to the other that no such automatic extension shall occur, then Executive’s employment shall terminate on the last day of the Annual Period

 

3



 

during which such notice is given unless sooner terminated as provided in this Agreement.

 

4.                                        Position and Duties .

 

(a)                                   During the Employment Term, Executive shall be employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of Employer, under the direction and subject to the control of the Board (which direction shall be such as is customarily exercised over a chief executive officer), and Executive shall be responsible for the business, affairs, properties and operations of Employer and shall have general executive charge, management and control of Employer, with all such powers and authority with respect to such business, affairs, properties and operations as may be reasonably incident to such duties and responsibilities.  In addition, Executive shall have such other duties, functions, responsibilities, and authority as are from time to time delegated to Executive by the Board; provided, however, that such duties, functions, responsibilities, and authority are reasonable and customary for a person serving in the same or similar capacity of an enterprise comparable to Employer.  The assignment to Executive of duties and/or responsibilities that are materially inconsistent with Executive’s status, positions, duties, responsibilities and functions with the Employer immediately prior to the effective date of such assignment or the removal of Executive from, or the failure to re-elect Executive to, any material corporate office of the Employer held by Executive immediately prior to such effective date shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement by the Employer.

 

(b)                                  During the Employment Term, Executive shall devote his full business time, skill, and attention and his best efforts to the business and affairs of Employer to the extent necessary to discharge fully, faithfully, and efficiently the duties and responsibilities delegated and assigned to Executive in or pursuant to this Agreement, except for usual, ordinary, and customary periods of vacation and absence due to illness or other disability and as otherwise specified in this paragraph.  Employer agrees that it shall not be a violation of this paragraph for Executive to (i) serve on corporate, civic or charitable boards or committees, (ii) deliver lectures, fulfill speaking engagements or teach at educational institutions, and (iii) manage personal investments, so long as in the case of (i), (ii) and (iii) above such activities do not significantly interfere or conflict with the performance of Executive’s responsibilities under this Agreement or the interests of Employer.  Executive shall not become a member of the board of directors or committees of any other for profit business organization without prior written consent of the Board.

 

(c)                                   In connection with Executive’s employment under this Agreement, Executive shall be based in Houston, Texas, or at any other place where the principal executive offices of Employer may be located during the Employment Term, subject to the provisions of Paragraph 1(h)(iii).  Executive also will engage in such travel as the performance of Executive’s duties in the business of Employer may require.

 

4



 

(d)                                  All services that Executive may render to Employer or any of its Affiliates in any capacity during the Employment Term shall be deemed to be services required by this Agreement and the consideration for such services is that provided for in this Agreement.

 

(e)                                   Executive hereby acknowledges that he has read and is familiar with Employer’s policies regarding business ethics and conduct, and will comply with all such provisions, and any amendments thereto, during the Employment Term.

 

5.                                        Compensation and Related Matters .

 

(a)                                   Base Salary .  During each Annual Period of the Employment Term, Employer shall pay to Executive for his services under this Agreement an annual base salary (“ Base Salary ”).  The Base Salary on the Effective Date shall be $400,000.  The Base Salary is subject to adjustment, at the discretion of the Board, but in no event shall Employer pay Executive a Base Salary less than that set forth above, or than any increased Base Salary later in effect, without the consent of Executive.  The Base Salary is earned pro rata and shall be payable in installments in accordance with the general payroll practices of Employer, or as otherwise mutually agreed upon.

 

(b)                                  Annual Incentives .

 

(i)            Beginning with the Effective Date, Executive will participate in any incentive compensation plan (ICP) applicable to Executive’s position, as may be adopted by Employer from time to time and in accordance with the terms of such plan.  Executive’s annual cash target award opportunity under the ICP will be 100% of Executive’s Base Salary with a threshold of 50% and a 200% maximum, and shall be subject to such other terms, conditions and restrictions as may be established by the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board (“ ICP Bonus Award ”).  Executive and the Board have agreed to a set of performance metrics for the ICP Bonus Award applicable to the present Annual Period.  With respect to any subsequent Annual Period(s), Executive will develop and submit to the Compensation Committee of the Board, for review and approval, proposed performance metrics by no later than May 1 of the then-current Annual Period, and the Board and Executive will strive to have the performance metrics finalized by no later than May 15.  Any ICP Bonus Award determined earned will be paid to Executive within 30 days after the end of the Annual Period to which it relates.

 

(ii)           In addition to any ICP Bonus Award that he earns under the ICP, Employer will also grant Executive an annual award of stock options under its equity incentive plan then in effect in an amount equal to 50% of the number of dollars of the cash award ( e.g. , if the cash award is $200,000, Executive would receive an award of options to purchase 100,000 shares of Employer’s common stock) (the “ ICP Options ”).  The ICP Options will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Employer’s common stock on the grant date, will have a five-year life, and will vest equally over a three-year period on each anniversary of the grant date.

 

5



 

(c)                                   Employee Benefits .  During the Employment Term, Executive shall be entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans, programs, and arrangements that are generally made available by Employer to its senior executives, including without limitation Employer’s life insurance, long-term disability, and health plans.  Executive acknowledges and agrees that cooperation and participation in medical or physical examinations may be required by one or more insurance companies in connection with the applications for such life and/or disability insurance policies.

 

(d)                                  Expenses .  Executive shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred by Executive during the Employment Term in performing his duties and responsibilities under this Agreement, consistent with Employer’s policies or practices for reimbursement of expenses incurred by other senior executives of Employer (“ Business Expenses ”).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement during a calendar year may not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement in any other calendar year, (ii) the reimbursement must be made on or before the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense was incurred and (iii) the right to reimbursement shall not be subject to liquidation or exchange for any other benefit.

 

(e)                                   Vacations .  During each Annual Period of the Employment Term, Executive shall be eligible for four weeks’ paid vacation, as well as sick pay and other paid and unpaid time off in accordance with the policies and practices of Employer.  Executive agrees to use his vacation and other paid time off at such times that are (i) consistent with the proper performance of his duties and responsibilities and (ii) mutually convenient for Employer and Executive.

 

(f)                                     Fringe Benefits .  During the Employment Term, Executive shall be entitled to the perquisites and other fringe benefits that are made available by Employer to its senior executives generally and to such perquisites and fringe benefits that are made available by Employer to Executive in particular, subject to any applicable terms and conditions of any specific perquisite or other fringe benefit.  However, the Executive shall NOT receive a fringe benefit for club memberships or non-profit organization memberships.

 

(g)                                  Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance .  Employer has obtained a D&O insurance policy and provided Executive a copy of the policy.

 

6.                                        Termination of Employment .

 

(a)                                   Death .  Executive’s employment shall terminate automatically upon his death.

 

(b)                                  Inability to Perform .  Employer may terminate Executive’s employment for Inability to Perform.

 

(c)                                   Termination by Employer for Cause .  Subject to the provisions of this Paragraph 6(c), Employer may terminate Executive’s employment for Cause by providing Executive with a Notice of Termination as set out in Paragraph 6(f).  If Employer

 

6



 

notifies Executive of its intent to terminate Executive’s employment in whole or part under provisions (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (viii) of the definition of Cause, the Notice of Termination must first provide Executive with a reasonable period of time to correct those circumstances or events Employer contends give rise to the existence of Cause under such provision(s) (the “ Correction Period ”), but not to the extent the Board makes a reasonable, good faith determination that those circumstances or events cannot reasonably be corrected, in which case, the Notice of Termination must describe the basis for that determination.  A 30-day Correction Period shall be presumptively reasonable.  In all cases, Executive will be given the opportunity within 30 calendar days after his receipt of Employer’s Notice of Termination for Cause to defend himself with respect to the circumstances or events specified in such notice and in a manner and under such procedures as the Board may establish.  At a minimum, such procedures shall allow Executive to meet with the Board, with Executive’s attorney if desired by Executive.  Nothing in this Paragraph 6(c) precludes informal discussions between Executive and any member of the Board regarding such circumstances or events.

 

(d)                                  Termination by Executive for Good Reason .  Executive may terminate his employment for Good Reason.  To exercise his right to terminate for Good Reason, Executive must provide a Notice of Termination (subject to Employer’s opportunity to remedy as described below) within 90 days after the date he first becomes aware of the condition(s) giving rise to the Good Reason; otherwise, Executive is deemed to have accepted the condition(s), or Employer’s correction of such condition(s), that may have given rise to the existence of Good Reason.  Employer shall have 30 days to remedy the Good Reason condition(s).  If not remedied within that 30-day period, Executive may terminate for Good Reason in accordance with the Notice of Termination.

 

(e)                                   Termination by Either Party Without Cause or Without Good Reason .  Either Employer or Executive may terminate Executive’s employment without Cause or without Good Reason upon at least 30 days’ prior written notice to the other party.  Upon termination without Cause or upon receipt of a Notice of Termination from Executive without Good Reason, Employer may elect to relieve Executive of his duties, and pay his pro rata Base Salary and provide him his employment benefits for the notice period, and Executive shall resign from the Board, none of which shall constitute Good Reason.

 

(f)                                     Notice of Termination .  Any termination of Executive’s employment by Employer or by Executive (other than a termination pursuant to Paragraph 6(a)) shall be communicated by a written Notice of Termination.  A “Notice of Termination” is a written notice that must (i) indicate the specific termination provision in this Agreement relied upon; (ii) in the case of a termination for Inability to Perform, Cause, or Good Reason, set forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of Executive’s employment under the provision invoked; and (iii) if the termination is by Executive under Paragraph 6(e), or by Employer for any reason, specify the Employment Termination Date.

 

7



 

The failure by Employer or Executive to set forth in the Notice of Termination any fact or circumstance that contributes to a showing of Cause or Good Reason shall not waive any right of Employer or Executive or preclude either of them from asserting such fact or circumstance in enforcing or defending their rights.

 

(g)                                  Employment Termination Date .  The Employment Termination Date, whether occurring before or after a change of control of the Employer, shall be as follows: (i) if Executive’s employment is terminated by his death, the date of his death; (ii) if Executive’s employment is terminated by Employer because of his Inability to Perform the date specified in the Notice of Termination, which date shall be no earlier than the date such notice is given; (iii) if Executive’s employment is terminated by Employer for Cause, the date specified in the Notice of Termination, which date shall not be earlier than the last day of the Correction Period (if applicable); (iv) if Executive’s employment is terminated by Executive for Good Reason, the last day of the Employer’s remedy period, which date shall be 30 days after the date on which the Notice of Termination is given in accordance with Paragraph 6(d); (v) if the termination is under Paragraph 6(e), the date specified in the Notice of Termination, which date shall be no earlier than 30 days after the date such notice is given; or (vi) if Executive’s employment is terminated by expiration of the Employment Term, the date the Employment Term expires.

 

(h)                                  Deemed Resignation .  In the event of termination of Executive’s employment, Executive agrees that if at such time he is a member of the Board or is an officer of Employer or a director or officer of any of its Affiliates, he shall be deemed to have resigned from such position(s) effective on the Employment Termination Date, unless the Board and Executive agree in writing prior to the Employment Termination Date that Executive shall remain a member of the Board, in which case Executive shall not be deemed to have resigned his position as a member of the Board merely by virtue of the termination of his employment.  Executive agrees to execute and deliver any documents evidencing his resignation from such positions that Employer may reasonably request; provided, however, that no such document shall affect the date that Executive ceased to be a Board member as described above such that Executive continues to have duties as a Board member beyond the date specified in the preceding sentence.

 

(i)                                      Investigation; Suspension .  Employer may suspend Executive with pay pending (a) an investigation as described in Paragraph 1(d)(viii), or (b) a determination by the Board whether Executive has engaged in acts or omissions constituting Cause.  Such a paid suspension shall not constitute a termination of Executive’s employment, or Good Reason.  Executive agrees to cooperate with Employer in connection with any such investigation.

 

7.                                        Compensation Upon Termination of Employment .

 

(a)                                   Death .  If Executive’s employment is terminated by reason of Executive’s death, Employer shall pay to such person as Executive shall designate in a written notice

 

8



 

to Employer (or, if no such person is designated, to his estate) any unpaid portion of Executive’s Base Salary earned pro rata through the Employment Termination Date (the “ Compensation Payment ”), any earned but unused vacation (the “ Vacation Payment ”), and any unreimbursed Business Expenses, at the time and in the manner required by applicable law but in no event later than 30 business days after the Employment Termination Date.  In addition, all Employer stock options and restricted stock awards held by Executive as of the Employment Termination Date shall be fully and immediately vested, and Executive’s estate or other authorized representative or beneficiary will have twelve months after the Employment Termination Date, to exercise all Employer stock options, provided that in no event may such stock options be exercised after the latest date upon which the options would have expired by their original terms.

 

(b)                                  Inability to Perform .  If Executive’s employment is terminated by reason of Executive’s Inability to Perform, Employer shall pay to Executive the Compensation Payment, the Vacation Payment, and any unreimbursed Business Expenses at the time and in the manner required by applicable law but in no event later than 30 business days after the Employment Termination Date.  In addition, all Employer stock options and restricted stock awards held by Executive as of the Employment Termination Date shall be fully and immediately vested, and Executive will have twelve months after the Employment Termination Date, to exercise all Employer stock options, provided that in no event may such stock options be exercised after the latest date upon which the options would have expired by their original terms.

 

(c)                                   Termination by Executive Without Good Reason or Upon Expiration of Employment Term Due to Executive Notice .  If Executive’s employment is terminated by Executive pursuant to and in compliance with Paragraph 6(e) or if Executive notifies the Employer under Paragraph 3 of the discontinuance of automatic extensions of the Employment Term and as a result Executive’s employment ends upon the expiration of the Employment Term, Employer shall pay to Executive the Compensation Payment, the Vacation Payment, and any unreimbursed Business Expenses, at the time and in the manner required by applicable law but in no event later than 30 business days after the Employment Termination Date.

 

(d)                                  Termination for Cause .  If Executive’s employment is terminated by Employer for Cause, Employer shall pay to Executive the Compensation Payment, the Vacation Payment, and any unreimbursed Business Expenses, at the time and in the manner required by applicable law but in no event later than 30 business days after the Employment Termination Date.

 

(e)                                   Termination Without Cause or With Good Reason or Upon Expiration of Employment Term Due to Employer Notice .  If Executive’s employment is terminated by Employer for any reason other than death, Inability to Perform, or Cause; is terminated by Executive for Good Reason during the Employment Term; or ends upon the expiration of the Employment Term due to the Employer

 

9



 

notifying Executive under Paragraph 3 of the discontinuance of automatic extensions of the Employment Term,

 

(i)            Employer shall pay to Executive the Compensation Payment, the Vacation Payment, and any unreimbursed Business Expenses, at the time and in the manner required by applicable law but in no event later than 30 business days after the Employment Termination Date.

 

(ii)           In addition but subject to subparagraph (iii) of this Paragraph 7(e), Employer shall pay or provide to Executive in lieu of any other severance or separation benefits (including, without limitation, those set forth in Employer’s Involuntary Termination Severance Plan), the following if, within 45 days (or within the expiration of such other applicable review and revocation period as may then be mandated by law) after the Employment Termination Date, Executive has signed a general release agreement and does not revoke such release:

 

(A)          An amount equal to Executive’s annual Base Salary as in effect on the Employment Termination Date;

 

(B)           An amount equal to Executive’s annual ICP Bonus Award at the target level for the performance period in effect on the Employment Termination Date;

 

(C)           Full and immediate vesting of all Employer stock options and restricted stock awards held by Executive as of the Employment Termination Date;

 

(D)          Executive will have twelve months after the Employment Termination Date, to exercise all Employer stock options, provided that in no event may such stock options be exercised after the latest date upon which the options would have expired by their original terms.

 

Amounts payable under Paragraphs 7(e)(ii)(A)-(B) shall be payable to Executive in a single lump sum payment in cash within 60 days after the Employment Termination Date; provided that if such 60-day period begins in one taxable year and ends in a subsequent taxable year, payment shall occur in the second taxable year.

 

(iii)          Employer’s obligation under Paragraph 7(e)(ii) is limited as follows:

 

(A)          If Executive engages in any conduct that materially violates Paragraph 8 or engages in any of the Restricted Activities described in Paragraph 9, Employer’s obligation to make payments to Executive under Paragraph 7(e)(ii), if any such obligation remains, shall end as of the date Employer so notifies Executive in writing; provided that such obligation shall not end if an arbitrator finally determines in accordance with Paragraph 28 that Executive

 

10



 

did not materially violate Paragraph 8 or engage in any of the Restricted Activities described in Paragraph 9; and

 

(B)           If Executive is found guilty or enters into a plea agreement, consent decree, or similar arrangement with respect to any felony criminal offense or any material violation of federal or state securities laws, or has a cease-and-desist order, injunction, or other penalty or judgment issued or entered in any material civil enforcement action brought against him by any United States regulatory agency or by a court of competent jurisdiction in a proceeding commenced by such a regulatory agency (in either case, regardless of whether Executive admits or denies the substantive allegations, and in each case for actions or omissions related to his employment with Employer or any of its Affiliates), (1) Employer’s obligation to make payments to Executive under this Paragraph 7(e)(ii) shall end as of the date that Employer so notifies Executive in writing, and (2) Executive shall repay to Employer any amounts paid to him pursuant to this Paragraph 7(e)(ii) within 30 days after receipt of a written request to do so by Employer.

 

(f)                                     Parachute Payment Excise Tax Gross Up .  In the event that it is determined that any payment (other than the Gross-Up payment provided for in this Paragraph 7(f)) or distribution by Employer or any of its Affiliates to or for the benefit of Executive, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise pursuant to or by reason of any other agreement, policy, plan, program or arrangement, including without limitation any stock option or similar right, or the lapse or termination of any restriction on or the vesting or exercisability of any of the foregoing (a “ Payment ”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) by reason of being considered “contingent on a change in ownership or control” of Employer, within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code or any successor provision thereto (such tax being hereafter referred to as the “280G Excise Tax ”), then Executive will be entitled to receive an additional payment or payments (a “280G Gross-Up Payment ”).  The 280G Gross-Up Payment will be in an amount such that, after payment by Executive of all taxes, including any 280G Excise Tax imposed upon the 280G Gross-Up Payment, Executive retains an amount of the 280G Gross-Up Payment equal to the 280G Excise Tax imposed upon the Payment.  For purposes of determining the amount of the 280G Gross-Up Payment, Executive will be considered to pay (x) federal income taxes at the highest rate in effect in the year in which the 280G Gross-Up Payment will be made and (y) state and local income taxes at the highest rate in effect in the state or locality in which the 280G Gross-Up Payment would be subject to state or local tax, net of the maximum reduction in federal income tax that could be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes.  The determination of whether the 280G Excise Tax would be imposed, the amount of such 280G Excise Tax, and the calculation of the amounts referred to in this

 

11


 

Paragraph 7(f) will be made at the expense of Employer by Employer’s regular independent accounting firm (the “ Accounting Firm ”), which shall provide detailed supporting calculations.  Any determination by the Accounting Firm will be binding upon Employer and Executive.  The 280G Gross-Up Payment will be paid to Executive as soon as administratively practicable following, but no later than the end of the calendar year in which falls the date on which Executive remits the related taxes.

 

(g)                                  Section 409A Excise Tax Gross Up .  Executive and Employer each acknowledges and agrees that (i) Executive’s employment did not end upon expiration of the Employment Term set forth in the 2009 Employment Agreement, but instead continued pursuant to this Agreement and, therefore, (ii) that Executive is due no payments or benefits under Paragraph 7(e) of the 2009 Employment Agreement.  Nevertheless, if the terms of this Agreement (as may be modified pursuant to Paragraph 7(j)) or the 2009 Employment Agreement or any action or omission by the Employer in its performance under this Agreement or the 2009 Agreement, causes any payment or benefit received or to be received by Executive from the Employer pursuant to this Agreement or the 2009 Agreement (the “Agreement Payments” ) to be subject to the excise tax and additional interest imposed by Code Section 409A(a)(1)(B) (the “409A Excise Tax” ), the Employer shall pay Executive, at the time specified below, an additional amount (the “409A Gross-Up Payment” ) such that the net amount that Executive retains, after deduction of the 409A Excise Tax on the Agreement Payments; any federal, state, and local income and employment taxes upon the 409A Gross-Up Payment; any additional 409A Excise Taxes upon the 409A Gross-Up Payment; and any interest, penalties, or additions to tax payable by Executive with respect thereto, shall be equal to the total present value (using the applicable federal rate (as defined in section 1274(d) of the Code) in such calculation) of the Agreement Payments at the time such payments are to be made.  Payment of such additional amount shall occur on or before the earlier to occur of (i) the date which the Employer is required to withhold any such taxes and (ii) the date on which Executive remits such taxes to the Internal Revenue Service (to the extent not withheld).  For purposes of determining the amount of the 409A Gross-Up Payment, Executive shall be deemed to pay federal income taxes at the highest marginal rates of federal income taxation applicable to individuals in the calendar year in which the 409A Gross-Up Payment is to be made and state and local income taxes at the highest marginal rates of taxation applicable to individuals as are in effect in the state and locality of Executive’s residence in the calendar year in which the 409A Gross-Up Payment is to be made, net of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes that can be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes, taking into account any limitations applicable to individuals subject to federal income tax at the highest marginal rates.  The 409A Gross-Up Payment is not intended to duplicate any payments that may be due under Section 7(e) of this Agreement and will not limit in any way Executive’s obligations with respect to executing and not revoking a general release as provided under Section 7(e).

 

12



 

(h)                                  Health Insurance .  In addition, if Executive’s employment with Employer or an Affiliate or successor of Employer is terminated or ends under the circumstances set forth in Paragraph 7(e), Executive will receive, in addition to any other payments due under this Agreement, the following benefit: if, at the time of the Employment Termination Date, Executive participates in one or more health plans offered or made available by Employer and Executive is eligible for and elects to receive continued coverage under such plans in accordance with the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“ COBRA ”) or any successor law, Employer will reimburse Executive during the 18-month period following the Employment Termination Date, for the difference between the total amount of the monthly COBRA premiums for the same coverage as in effect on the Employment Termination Date, that are actually paid by Executive for such continued health plan benefits and the total monthly amount of the same premiums charged to active senior executives of Employer for health insurance coverage.  Such reimbursement shall be made within the 90-day period following Executive’s payment of each monthly COBRA premium.  Provided, however, that Employer’s reimbursement obligation under this Paragraph 7(h) shall terminate upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of the time period described above or (ii) the date Executive becomes eligible for health insurance coverage under a subsequent employer’s plan without being subject to any preexisting-condition exclusion under that plan, which occurrence Executive shall promptly report to Employer.

 

(i)                                      Exclusive Compensation and Benefits .  The compensation and benefits described in this Paragraph 7, along with the associated terms for payment, constitute all of Employer’s obligations to Executive with respect to the ending of Executive’s employment with Employer and/or its Affiliates, subject to Paragraph 24 and the remainder of this Paragraph 7(i).  Accordingly, Executive and Employer expressly acknowledge and agree that, following the Employment Termination Date, Executive shall have no rights to any employment by Employer or its Affiliates (including employment as described in Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Agreement), and no rights to any further compensation or benefits under Paragraph 5 of this Agreement, provided that Executive shall remain eligible for coverage under Employer’s D&O insurance policy or policies to the extent provided by the terms of such policy or policies.  Executive and Employer further acknowledge and agree that nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit or terminate (i) any obligations of Employer or Executive under the other terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, with respect to Employer, its obligations under Paragraphs 12 and 20, and, with respect to Executive, his obligations under Paragraphs 6(h), 8, 9, 10, 13, 22, and 23, or (ii) any earned, vested benefits (other than any entitlement to severance or separation pay, if any) that Executive may have under the applicable provisions of any benefit plan of Employer in which Executive is participating at the time of the termination of employment.

 

(j)                                      Code Section 409A Matters .  This Agreement is intended to comply with Code Section 409A and any ambiguous provisions will be construed in a manner that is compliant with or exempt from the application of Code Section 409A.  If a provision of the Agreement would result in the imposition of an applicable tax

 

13



 

under Code Section 409A, the parties agree that such provision shall be reformed to avoid imposition of the applicable tax, with such reformation effected in a manner that has the most favorable result to Executive.

 

For purposes of Code Section 409A, each payment or amount due under this Agreement shall be considered a separate payment, and Executive’s entitlement to a series of payments under this Agreement is to be treated as an entitlement to a series of separate payments.

 

If (i) Executive is a “specified employee,” as such term is defined in Code Section 409A and determined as described below in this Paragraph 7(j), and (ii) any payment due under this Agreement is subject to Code Section 409A and is required to be delayed under Code Section 409A because Executive is a specified employee, that payment shall be payable on the earlier of (A) the first business day that is six months after Executive’s separation from service, as such term is defined in Code Section 409A, (B) the date of Executive’s death, or (C) the date that otherwise complies with the requirements of Section 409A.  This Paragraph 7(j) shall be applied by accumulating all payments that otherwise would have been paid within six months after Executive’s separation and paying such accumulated amounts on the earliest business day which complies with the requirements of Code Section 409A.  For purposes of determining the identity of specified employees, the Board may establish procedures as it deems appropriate in accordance with Code Section 409A.

 

(k)                                   Payment after Executive’s Death .  In the event of Executive’s death after he becomes entitled to a payment or payments pursuant to this Paragraph 7, any remaining unpaid amounts shall be paid, at the time and in the manner such payments otherwise would have been paid to Executive, to such person as Executive shall designate in a written notice to Employer (or, if no such person is designated, to his estate).

 

(l)                                      Offset .  Executive agrees that Employer may set off against, and Executive authorizes Employer to deduct from, any payments due to Executive, or to his heirs, legal representatives, or successors, as a result of the termination of Executive’s employment any amounts which may be due and owing to Employer or any of its Affiliates by Executive, whether arising under this Agreement or otherwise; provided, however, that any such set off and deduction shall be made only to the extent it does not result in the imposition of any excise tax under Code Section 409A to the extent applicable.

 

8.                                        Confidential Information .

 

(a)                                   Executive acknowledges and agrees that (i) Employer and its Affiliates are engaged in a highly competitive business; (ii) Employer and its Affiliates have expended considerable time and resources to develop goodwill with their customers, vendors, and others, and to create, protect, and exploit Confidential Information; (iii) Employer must continue to prevent the dilution of its and its Affiliates’ goodwill and unauthorized use or disclosure of its Confidential Information to avoid harm to its legitimate business interests; (iv) in the acquisition, development and marketing of crude oil and natural gas, chemicals or

 

14



 

other hydrocarbon products, his participation in or direction of Employer’s or its Affiliates’ day-to-day operations and strategic planning are an integral part of Employer’s continued success and goodwill; (v) given his position and responsibilities, he necessarily will be creating Confidential Information that belongs to Employer and enhances Employer’s goodwill, and in carrying out his responsibilities he in turn will be relying on Employer’s goodwill and the disclosure by Employer to him of Confidential Information; and (vi) he will have access to Confidential Information that could be used by any Competitor of Employer in a manner that would harm Employer’s competitive position in the marketplace and dilute its goodwill.  Employer acknowledges and agrees that nothing in this Agreement precludes Executive from accepting employment from any third party employer after termination of employment with Employer and its Affiliates for whatever reason, provided that Executive complies with his obligations under Paragraph 8(d) and at law with respect to the Confidential Information.

 

(b)                                  Employer acknowledges and agrees that Executive must have and continue to have throughout his employment the benefits and use of its and its Affiliates’ goodwill and Confidential Information in order to properly carry out his responsibilities.  Employer accordingly promises upon execution and delivery of this Agreement to provide Executive immediate and continuing access to Confidential Information and to authorize him to engage in activities that will create new and additional Confidential Information.

 

(c)                                   Employer and Executive thus acknowledge and agree that during Executive’s employment with Employer, and upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, he (i) will receive Confidential Information that is unique, proprietary, and valuable to Employer and/or its Affiliates; (ii) will create Confidential Information that is unique, proprietary, and valuable to Employer and/or its Affiliates; and (iii) will benefit, including without limitation by way of increased earnings and earning capacity, from the goodwill Employer and its Affiliates have generated and from the Confidential Information.

 

(d)                                  Accordingly, Executive acknowledges and agrees that at all times during his employment by Employer and/or any of its Affiliates and thereafter:

 

(i)            all Confidential Information shall remain and be the sole and exclusive property of Employer and/or its Affiliates;

 

(ii)           he will protect and safeguard all Confidential Information;

 

(iii)          he will hold all Confidential Information in strictest confidence and not, directly or indirectly, disclose or divulge any Confidential Information to any person other than an officer, director, or employee of, or legal counsel for, Employer or its Affiliates, to the extent necessary for the proper performance of his responsibilities unless authorized to do so by Employer or compelled to do so by law or valid legal process;

 

15



 

(iv)          if he believes he is compelled by law or valid legal process to disclose or divulge any Confidential Information, he will notify Employer in writing sufficiently in advance of any such disclosure to allow Employer the opportunity to defend, limit, or otherwise protect its interests against such disclosure;

 

(v)           at the end of his employment with Employer for any reason or at the request of Employer at any time, he will return to Employer all Confidential Information and all copies thereof, in whatever tangible form or medium, including electronic; and

 

(vi)          absent the promises and representations of Executive in this Paragraph 8 and in Paragraph 9, Employer would require him immediately to return any tangible Confidential Information in his possession, would not provide Executive with new and additional Confidential Information, would not authorize Executive to engage in activities that will create new and additional Confidential Information, and would not enter or have entered into this Agreement.

 

9.                                        Nonsolicitation Obligations .  In consideration of Employer’s promises to provide Executive with Confidential Information and to authorize him to engage in activities that will create new and additional Confidential Information upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, and the other promises and undertakings of Employer in this Agreement, Executive agrees that, while he is employed by Employer and/or any of its Affiliates and for a 2-year period following the end of that employment for any reason, he shall not engage in any of the following activities (the “ Restricted Activities ”):

 

(a)                                   He will not, whether on his own behalf or on behalf of any other individual, partnership, firm, corporation or business organization, either directly or indirectly solicit, induce, persuade, or entice, or endeavor to solicit, induce, persuade, or entice, any person who is then employed by or otherwise engaged to perform services for Employer or its Affiliates to leave that employment or cease performing those services; and

 

(b)                                  He will not, whether on his own behalf or on behalf of any other individual, partnership, firm, corporation or business organization, either directly or indirectly solicit, induce, persuade, or entice, or endeavor to solicit, induce, persuade, or entice, any person who is then a customer, supplier, or vendor of Employer or any of its Affiliates to cease being a customer, supplier, or vendor of Employer or any of its Affiliates or to divert all or any part of such person’s or entity’s business from Employer or any of its Affiliates.

 

Executive acknowledges and agrees that the restrictions contained in this Paragraph 9 are ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement, including without limitation the mutual promises and undertakings set forth in Paragraph 8; that Employer’s promises and undertakings set forth in Paragraph 8 and Executive’s position and responsibilities with Employer give rise to Employer’s interest in restricting Executive’s post-employment activities; that such restrictions are designed to enforce Executive’s promises and undertakings set forth in this Paragraph 9 and his common-law obligations and duties owed to Employer and its Affiliates; that the restrictions are reasonable and necessary, are valid and enforceable under Texas law, and do not impose a

 

16



 

greater restraint than necessary to protect Employer’s goodwill, Confidential Information, and other legitimate business interests; that he will immediately notify Employer in writing should he believe or be advised that the restrictions are not, or likely are not, valid or enforceable under Texas law or the law of any other state that he contends or is advised is applicable; that the mutual promises and undertakings of Employer and Executive under Paragraphs 8 and 9 are not contingent on the duration of Executive’s employment with Employer; that absent the promises and representations made by Executive in this Paragraph 9 and Paragraph 8, Employer would require him to return any Confidential Information in his possession, would not provide Executive with new and additional Confidential Information, would not authorize Executive to engage in activities that will create new and additional Confidential Information, and would not enter or have entered into this Agreement; and that his obligations under Paragraphs 8 and 9 supplement, rather than supplant, his common-law duties of confidentiality and loyalty owed to Employer.

 

Employer agrees that any action that is undertaken by a subsequent employer of Executive will not be treated as an action by Executive for purposes of the foregoing provisions of this Paragraph 9 unless Executive personally engages in a Restricted Activity, whether directly or indirectly.

 

10.                                  Intellectual Property .

 

(a)                                   In consideration of Employer’s promises and undertakings in this Agreement, Executive agrees that all Work Product will be disclosed promptly by Executive to Employer, shall be the sole and exclusive property of Employer, and is hereby assigned to Employer, regardless of whether (i) such Work Product was conceived, made, developed or worked on during regular hours of his employment or his time away from his employment, (ii) the Work Product was made at the suggestion of Employer; or (iii) the Work Product was reduced to drawing, written description, documentation, models or other tangible form.  Without limiting the foregoing, Executive acknowledges that all original works of authorship that are made by Executive, solely or jointly with others, within the scope of his employment and that are protectable by copyright are “works made for hire,” as that term is defined in the United States Copyright Act (17 U.S.C., Section 101), and are therefore owned by Employer from the time of creation.

 

(b)                                  Executive agrees to assign, transfer, and set over, and Executive does hereby assign, transfer, and set over to Employer, all of his right, title and interest in and to all Work Product, without the necessity of any further compensation, and agrees that Employer is entitled to obtain and hold in its own name all patents, copyrights, and other rights in respect of all Work Product.  Executive agrees to (i) cooperate with Employer during and after his employment with Employer in obtaining patents or copyrights or other intellectual-property protection for all Work Product; (ii) execute, acknowledge, seal, and deliver all documents tendered by Employer to evidence its ownership thereof throughout the world; and (iii) cooperate with Employer in obtaining, defending, and enforcing its rights therein.

 

17



 

(c)                                   Executive represents that there are no other contracts to assign inventions or other intellectual property that are now in existence between Executive and any other person or entity.  Executive further represents that he has no other employment or undertakings that might restrict or impair his performance of this Agreement.  Executive will not in connection with his employment by Employer, use or disclose to Employer any confidential, trade secret, or other proprietary information of any previous employer or other person that Executive is not lawfully entitled to disclose.

 

11.                                  Reformation .  If the provisions of Paragraphs 8, 9, or 10 are ever deemed by a court to exceed the limitations permitted by applicable law, Executive and Employer agree that such provisions shall be, and are, automatically reformed to the maximum limitations permitted by such law.

 

12.                                  Indemnification and Insurance .  Employer shall indemnify Executive both (i) to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware, and (ii) in accordance with the more favorable of Employer’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws and standard indemnification agreement as in effect on the Effective Date or as in effect on the date as of which the indemnification is owed.  In addition, Employer shall provide Executive with coverage under directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies on terms not less favorable than those provided to any of its other directors and officers as in effect from time to time.

 

13.                                  Assistance in Litigation .  During the Employment Term and thereafter for the lifetime of Executive, Executive shall, upon reasonable notice, furnish such information and proper assistance to Employer or any of its Affiliates as may reasonably be required by Employer in connection with any litigation, investigations, arbitrations, and/or any other fact-finding or adjudicative proceedings involving Employer or any of its Affiliates.  This obligation shall include, without limitation, to promptly upon request meet with counsel for Employer or any of its Affiliates and provide truthful testimony at the request of Employer or as otherwise required by law or valid legal process.  Following the Employment Term, Employer shall reimburse Executive for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Executive and approved in advance by Employer in rendering such assistance (such as travel, parking, and meals but not attorney’s fees), but shall have no obligation to compensate Executive for his time in providing information and assistance in accordance with this Paragraph 13, provided that such reimbursement shall be made on or before the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense is incurred, and provided further that Executive’s obligations under this Paragraph 13 following the Employment Termination Date shall not unreasonably interfere with Executive’s employment or other activities and endeavors.

 

14.                                  No Obligation to Pay .  With regard to any payment due to Executive under this Agreement, it shall not be a breach of any provision of this Agreement for Employer to fail to make such payment to Executive if (i) Employer is prohibited from making the payment; (ii) Employer would be obligated to recover the payment if it was made; or (iii) Executive would be obligated to repay the payment if it was made; provided, however,

 

18



 

that this Paragraph 14 shall only apply if such prohibition or obligation is legally imposed by statute or regulation.

 

15.                                  Deductions and Withholdings .  With respect to any payment to be made to Executive, Employer shall deduct, where applicable, any amounts authorized by Employee, and shall withhold and report all amounts required to be withheld and reported by applicable law.

 

16.                                  Notices .  All notices, requests, demands, and other communications required or permitted to be given or made by either party shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given or made (a) when delivered personally, or (b) when deposited in the United States mail, first class registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the party for which intended at the following addresses (or at such other addresses as shall be specified by the parties by like notice, except that notices of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt):

 

(i)                                      If to Employer, at:

 

Hyperdynamics Corporation

Attn: Chairman of the Board of Directors

12012 Wickchester Lane

Suite 475

Houston, Texas 77079

 

(ii)                                   If to Executive, at Executive’s then-current home address on file with Employer.

 

17.                                  Injunctive Relief .  Executive acknowledges and agrees that Employer would not have an adequate remedy at law and would be irreparably harmed in the event that any of the provisions of Paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached.  Accordingly, Executive agrees that Employer shall be entitled to equitable relief, including preliminary and permanent injunctions and specific performance, in the event Executive breaches or threatens to breach any of the provisions of such Paragraphs, without the necessity of posting any bond or proving special damages or irreparable injury.  Such remedies shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedies for a breach or threatened breach of this Agreement by Executive, but shall be in addition to all other remedies available to Employer at law or equity.

 

18.                                  Mitigation .  Executive shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment provided for in this Agreement by seeking other employment or otherwise, nor shall the amount of any payment provided for in this Agreement be reduced by any compensation earned by Executive as the result of employment by another employer after the date of termination of Executive’s employment with Employer, or otherwise.

 

19.                                 Binding Effect; No Assignment by Executive; No Third Party Benefit .  This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns; provided, however, that Executive shall not assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any of his rights or obligations under this Agreement.  Subject to Paragraph 20, Employer is authorized to assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement only to an

 

19



 

Affiliate of Employer.  Executive shall not have any right to pledge, hypothecate, anticipate, or in any way create a lien upon any payments or other benefits provided under this Agreement; and no benefits payable under this Agreement shall be assignable in anticipation of payment either by voluntary or involuntary acts, or by operation of law, except by will or pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution.  Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer upon any person other than the parties, and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and permitted assigns, any rights, benefits, or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

 

20.                                  Assumption by Successor .  Employer shall ensure that any successor or assignee (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise) to all or substantially all the business and/or assets of Employer or the oil and gas acquisition, exploration, development and production business of Employer, either by operation of law or written agreement, assumes the obligations of this Agreement (the “ Assumption Obligation ”).  If Employer fails to fulfill the Assumption Obligation, such failure shall be considered a material breach of this Agreement for purposes of Paragraph 1(h)(iv); provided, however, that the compensation to which Executive would be entitled pursuant to Paragraph 7 upon a termination for Good Reason shall be the sole remedy of Executive for any failure by Employer to fulfill the Assumption Obligation.  As used in this Agreement, “Employer” shall include any successor or assignee (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise) to all or substantially all the business and/or assets of Employer or the oil and gas exploration, development and production business of Employer that executes and delivers the agreement provided for in this Paragraph 20 or that otherwise becomes obligated under this Agreement by operation of law.

 

21.                                  Legal Fees and Expenses .  Employer will pay or reimburse Executive for all reasonable legal fees and expenses up to $10,000.00 incurred by Executive in connection with the preparation, review, and negotiation of this Agreement prior to its execution, provided that any such payment or reimbursement shall be made within the same calendar year in which falls the Effective Date.

 

22.                                  Governing Law .  This Agreement and the employment of Executive, as well as any arbitration proceedings hereunder, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas except for its laws with respect to conflict of laws

 

23.                                  Entire Agreement .  This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter expressly addressed herein and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, written and oral, between the parties with respect to such subject matter.  However, nothing in this Paragraph 24 is intended to limit any obligations of the parties under any other agreement that Employer may enter into with Executive after the earlier of the Effective Date or the execution of this Agreement by Executive.  The provisions of this Agreement which provide for accelerated vesting and extended exercisability of stock options shall constitute amendments to any stock option agreements previously or hereafter entered into between Executive and Employer.

 

20



 

24.                                  Modification; Waiver .  No person, other than pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the members of the Board, shall have authority on behalf of Employer to agree to modify, amend, or waive any provision of this Agreement.  Further, this Agreement may not be changed orally, but only by a written agreement signed by the party against whom any waiver, change, amendment, modification or discharge is sought to be enforced.  Each party acknowledges and agrees that no breach by the other party of this Agreement or failure to enforce or insist on its rights under this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or abandonment of any such rights or defense to enforcement of such rights.

 

25.                                  Construction .  This Agreement is to be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties.

 

26.                                  Severability .  If any provision of this Agreement shall be determined by a court to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, shall remain in full force and effect, and shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

 

27.                                  Counterparts .  This Agreement may be executed by the parties in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.

 

28.                                  ARBITRATION .  ALL DISPUTES RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE SCOPE AND INTERPRETATION OF THIS ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRATOR, SHALL BE RESOLVED BY ARBITRATION USING THREE ARBITRATORS FOLLOWING THE RULES OF ARBITRATION OF THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION.  ALL COSTS OF THE ARBITRATION SHALL BE PAID BY EMPLOYER.  THE ARBITRATION PANEL SHALL BE SELECTED AS FOLLOWS:  THE EMPLOYER SHALL SELECT ONE ARBITRATOR, THE EXECUTIVE SHALL SELECT ONE ARBITRATOR, AND THE TWO ARBITRATORS THUS SELECTED SHALL SELECT THE THIRD ARBITRATOR.  THE ARBITRATOR SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO MODIFY THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO AVOID A FINDING THAT SUCH ARBITRATION PROVISIONS ARE UNCONSCIONABLE OR UNENFORCEABLE.  SUCH ARBITRATION SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ALL SUCH DISPUTES AND CONTROVERSIES RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT.  THE DECISION OF THE ARBITRATOR SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING WITH REGARD TO EACH PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer, and Executive has executed this Agreement, effective as of the date first set forth above.

 

21



 

EMPLOYER

 

EXECUTIVE

 

 

 

 

 

 

HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Robert A. Solberg

 

 

Ray Leonard

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

22




Exhibit 10.17

 

HYPERDYMANICS CORPORATION

 

2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED

 

ARTICLE I

ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLAN

 

Hyperdynamics Corporation (the “Company”) hereby establishes the Hyperdynamics Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”),as amended, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter stated.

 

ARTICLE II

DEFINITIONS

 

2.01         “Award” means any stock option, restricted stock or restricted stock unit award granted to a Participant under the Plan.

 

2.02         “Award Agreement” means the written agreement pursuant to Article VI hereof that sets forth the terms, conditions, restrictions and privileges for an Award and that incorporates the terms of the Plan.

 

2.03         “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

2.04         “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

2.05         “Committee” means the Compensation Committee consisting of three or more persons appointed by the Board pursuant to Section 3.01 hereof. If no Committee is appointed, the term “Committee” means the Board, except in those instances where the text clearly indicated otherwise.

 

2.06         “Common Stock” means shares of the Common Stock, $.001 par value per share, of the Company.

 

2.07         “Disability” means any physical or mental impairment which qualifies an Employee for disability benefits under the applicable long-term disability plan maintained by the Company or, if no such plan applies, which would qualify such Employee for disability benefits under the Federal Social Security System.

 

2.08         “Effective Date” means the date on which the Company’s stockholders vote to approve the Plan on the Board’s approval and recommendation of the Plan.

 

2.09         “Employee” means any person employed on an hourly or salaried basis by the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company that now exists or hereafter is organized or acquired by or acquires the Company and whose wages are reported on a Form W-2.  The Company classification as to who is an Employee shall be determinative for purposes of an individual’s eligibility under the Plan.

 

1



 

2.10         “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

2.11         “Fair Market Value” means the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the national securities exchange that is the principal market for the Common Stock of the date of grant (or on the last preceding trading date if shares were not traded on such date).  If the Common Stock is not listed on a securities exchange, Fair Market Value shall be the amount determined in good faith by the Committee.

 

2.12         “Incentive Stock Option” means any Award granted under this Plan which the Committee intends (at the time it is granted) to be an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.  All Incentive Stock Options issued under this Plan are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, and the regulations thereunder, and all provisions hereunder shall be read, interpreted and applied with that purpose in mind.

 

2.13         “Non-Qualified Stock Option” means any Option Award granted under this Plan which is a stock option but is not an Incentive Stock Option.

 

2.14         “Officer” means any Employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries who is designated by the Board as a corporate officer.

 

2.15         “Participant” means any Employee, Officer, director, consultant, independent contractor or other individual who is designated by the Committee or the Board pursuant to Article VI to participate in the Plan.

 

2.16         “Retirement” means a separation from service which constitutes a normal “retirement” under any applicable qualified retirement plan maintained by the Company or in the absence of a qualified retirement plan, a separation from service which is determined by the Board to constitute a “retirement.”

 

2.17         “Restricted Stock” means any Award granted under this Plan which the Committee intends (at the time it is granted) to be a restricted stock award within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code.

 

2.18         “Restricted Stock Unit” means any Award granted under this Plan which the Committee intends (at the time it is granted) to be a restricted stock unit settled in Common Stock, cash or a combination thereof at the end of a specified vesting period.

 

2.19         “Settlement” means the date on which the vesting requirements applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit are satisfied and the Company delivers to the Participant shares of Common Stock, cash or a combination of Common Stock and cash in satisfaction of such Restricted Stock Unit.

 

ARTICLE III

ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN AND MISCELLANEOUS

 

3.01         Plan Administration.  The Plan shall be administered by the Board unless the Board, in its discretion, appoints a Committee comprised of not fewer than three board members. If a Committee is not established, all references to “Committee” under the Plan shall be deemed

 

2



 

to refer to “Board” until such time as a Committee may be established.  A simple majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.  The Committee shall be responsible to the Board for the day-to-day operation of the Plan, although the Committee may, in its discretion, delegate to one or more Officers of the Company responsibility for certain ministerial actions associated with Plan administration.  The Committee may make recommendations to the Board with respect to participation in the Plan by Employees, Officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors or other individuals of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.  The Committee may consider such factors as it deems pertinent in selecting Participants and in determining the type and amount of Awards, if any, to be given including, without limitation; (i) the financial condition of the Company or its Subsidiaries; (ii) expected profits for the current or future years; (iii) the contributions of a prospective Participants to the profitability and success of the Company or its Subsidiaries; and (iv) the adequacy of the prospective Participant’s other compensation.

 

3.02         Limitation on Liability.  No member of the Committee shall be liable for any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan.  To the maximum extent allowed by law and the Company’s bylaws, the members of the Committee shall be indemnified by the Company in respect of all their activities under the Plan. The interpretation and construction of any provision of the Plan by the Committee shall be final, unless otherwise determined by the Board.

 

3.03         Compliance with Law and Regulations.  All Awards granted hereunder shall be subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations and to such approvals by any government or regulatory agency as may be required.  The Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificates for shares of Common Stock prior to the completion of any registration or qualification of or obtaining of consents or approvals with respect to such shares under any Federal or state law or any rule or regulation of any government body, which the Company shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable.

 

3.04         Restrictions on Transfer.  The Company shall place a legend upon any certificate representing shares acquired pursuant to an Award granted hereunder noting that the transfer of such shares may be restricted by applicable laws and regulations.

 

ARTICLE IV

ELIGIBILITY

 

Awards may be granted to such Employees, Officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors and other individuals as may be designated from time to time by the Committee, pursuant to guidelines, if any, which may be adopted by the Committee from time to time.

 

ARTICLE V

COMMON STOCK AVAILABLE FOR THE PLAN

 

The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued pursuant to this Plan shall be 10,000,000.  If a reorganization, merger, consolidation, reclassification,

 

3



 

recapitalization, combination or exchange of shares, stock split, stock dividend, rights offering, or other expansion or contraction of the Common Stock of the Company occurs, the number and class of shares underlying shares authorized to be granted or granted under this Plan, and the price per share payable upon exercise of an Award as applicable shall be equitably adjusted by the Committee to reflect such changes. To the extent deemed equitable and appropriate by the Board, subject to any required action by stockholders, in any merger, consolidation, reorganization, liquidation or dissolution, any Award granted under the Plan shall pertain to the securities and other property to which a holder of the number of shares of stock covered by the Award would have been entitled to receive in connection with such event.

 

No shares shall be the subject of more than one Award at any time, but if an Award as to any shares is surrendered before exercise, or expires or terminates for any reason without having been exercised in full, or for any other reason ceases to be exercisable, the number of shares covered thereby shall again become available for grant under the Plan as if no Awards had been previously granted with respect to such shares.

 

ARTICLE VI

PARTICIPATION; AWARD AGREEMENT

 

The Committee shall, in its discretion, determine from time to time which Employees, Officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors and other individuals will participate in the Plan and receive Awards under the Plan.  In making all such determinations there shall be taken into account the duties, responsibilities and performance of each respective Employee, Officer, director, consultant, independent contractor, or other individual, his present and potential contributions to the growth and success of the Company, his cash compensation and such other factors as the Committee shall deem relevant to accomplishing the purposes of the Plan.

 

Awards may be granted individually or in tandem with other Awards.  All Awards are subject to the terms, conditions, restrictions and privileges of the Plan in addition to the terms, conditions, restrictions and privileges for an Award contained in the Award Agreement.  No Award under this Plan shall be effective unless memorialized in writing by the Committee in an Award Agreement delivered to and signed by the Participant.

 

ARTICLE VII

AWARDS

 

7.01         Stock Options.  The Committee may from time to time grant to eligible participants Awards of Incentive Stock Options or Non-Qualified Stock Options, provided however that Awards of Incentive Stock Options shall be limited to Employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.  All Incentive Stock Options must have an exercise price at least equal to the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock at the time of grant, except as provided in Section 8.05.

 

7.02         Restricted Stock The Committee may from time to time grant restricted Stock Awards to eligible Participants in such amounts, on such terms and conditions, and for such consideration, including no consideration or such minimum consideration as may be required by law, as it shall determine.

 

4



 

7.03         Restricted Stock Units.   The Committee may from time to time grant restricted Stock Unit Awards to eligible Participants in such amounts, on such terms and conditions, as it shall determine.

 

ARTICLE VIII

OPTION AWARDS

 

8.01         Vesting of Options

 

(a)            General Rules.  Incentive Stock Options and Non-Qualified Stock Options shall become vested and exercisable as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, no vesting shall occur on or after the date that a Participant’s employment with Company terminates for any reason.

 

(b)            Accelerated Vesting Upon Death, Disability or Retirement. Notwithstanding the general rule described in subsection (a), only those Stock Options granted to a Participant under this Plan that are vested on the date of a Participant’s death, Disability or Retirement shall be exercisable by the Participant or the Participant’s representative. Upon a Participant’s death, Disability or Retirement, the Committee may elect to accelerate vesting with respect to all or a portion of an unvested Stock Option.

 

8.02         Duration of Options. Each Stock Option granted to a Participant shall be exercisable at any time on or after it vests until the earlier of (i) a date specified in the Award Agreement that shall be no later than ten (10) years after its date of grant or (ii) a date specified in the Award Agreement that shall be no later than one year from the date that the Participant ceases to be employed by (or act as a consultant to) the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

 

8.03         Notice of Disposition; Withholding; Escrow.  A Participant shall immediately notify the Company in writing of any sale, transfer, assignment or other disposition (or action constituting a disqualifying disposition within the meaning of Section 421 of the Code) of any shares of Common Stock acquired through exercise of an Incentive Stock Option, within two (2) years after the grant of such Incentive Stock Option or within one (1) year after the acquisition of such shares, setting forth the date and manner of disposition, the number of shares disposed of and the price at which such shares were disposed.  The Company shall be entitled to withhold from any compensation or other payments then or thereafter due to the Participant such amounts as may be necessary to satisfy any withholding requirements of Federal or state law or regulation and, further, to collect from the Participant any additional amounts which may be required for such purpose.  The Committee may, in its discretion, require shares of Common Stock acquired by a Participant upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option to be held in an escrow arrangement for the purpose of enabling compliance with the provisions of this Section 8.03.

 

8.04         Manner of Exercise .  To the extent vested and exercisable, Awards may be exercised in part or in whole from time to time by execution of a written notice directed to the Committee, at the Company’ principal place of business, accompanied by a check in payment of the exercise price for the number of shares specified and paid for.

 

5



 

8.05         $100,000 Limitation .  Notwithstanding any contrary provisions contained elsewhere in this Plan and as long as required by Section 422 of the Code, the aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the time an Incentive Stock Option is granted, of the Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by the Participant during any calendar year, under this Plan and stock options that satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code under any other stock option plan or plans maintained by the Company, shall not exceed $100,000.

 

8.06         Limitation on Ten Percent Stockholders.  The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an individual who, at the time such Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns, directly or indirectly, more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock issued to stockholders of the Company, shall be no less than one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of the Common Stock of the Company at the time of grant, and such Incentive Stock Option shall by its terms not be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date such Incentive Stock Option is granted.

 

ARTICLE IX

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

 

Section 9.01          Award and Restrictions .  A Restricted Stock Unit Award is an Award determined by reference to a number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant.  Restricted Stock Units shall be satisfied at Settlement by the delivery of cash and/or Common Stock in the amount equal to the Fair Market Value for the specified number of shares of Common Stock covered by the Restricted Stock Units, as set forth in the Award Agreement.  Settlement of an Award of Restricted Stock Units shall occur upon expiration of the vesting period specified for such Restricted Stock Unit by the Committee.  Vesting restrictions shall be based on continuing employment and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives as the Committee shall set forth in the Award Agreement.

 

Section 9.02          Dividend Equivalents .  Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at grant, Dividend Equivalents on the specified number of shares of Common Stock covered by an Award of Restricted Stock Units shall be either (a) paid with respect to such unvested Restricted Stock Units on the dividend payment date in cash or in shares of unrestricted Common Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such dividends, or (b) deferred with respect to such unvested Restricted Stock Units and the amount or value thereof automatically deemed reinvested in additional unvested Restricted Stock Units, respectively, as the Committee shall determine.

 

ARTICLE X

RESTRICTED STOCK

 

Section 10.01        Award and Restrictions .  A Restricted Stock Award is an Award pursuant to which the Company may, grant or sell, at par value or such other higher purchase price determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, shares of Stock subject to such

 

6



 

restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant, which purchase price shall be payable in cash or by promissory note as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.  Vesting restrictions shall be based on continuing employment and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives.  The terms and conditions of each such agreement shall be determined by the Committee, and such terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and Participants.

 

Section 10.02        Rights as a Stockholder .  Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at grant, a Participant shall have the rights of a stockholder of the Company holding Common Stock, including the right to vote the shares of Common stock covered by the Award of Restricted Stock.  Unless the Committee shall otherwise determine, certificates evidencing the Restricted Stock shall remain in the possession of the Company until such Restricted Stock is vested.

 

Section 10.03        Vesting of Restricted Stock .  The Committee at the time of grant shall specify the date or dates and/or the attainment of pre-established performance goals, objectives and other conditions under which Restricted Stock shall become vested, subject to such further rights of the Company as may be specified in Award Agreement evidencing the Restricted Stock Award.

 

Section 10.04        Dividends .  Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at grant, Dividends on the specified number of shares of Common Stock covered by an Award of Restricted Stock shall be either (a) paid with respect to such unvested Restricted Stock on the dividend payment date in cash or in shares of unrestricted Common Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such dividends, or (b) deferred with respect to such unvested Restricted Stock and the amount or value thereof automatically deemed reinvested in additional unvested Restricted Stock, respectively, as the Committee shall determine.

 

ARTICLE XI

NONASSIGNABILITY

 

Awards shall not be transferable by a Participant except by will or the laws of descent or distribution, and during a Participant’s lifetime shall be exercisable only by such Participant or the Participant’s guardian or legal representative.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, or any other provision of this Plan, a Participant who holds Non-Qualified Stock Options may transfer such Awards to his or her spouse, lineal ascendants, lineal descendants, or to a duly established trust for the benefit of one or more of these individuals.  Awards so transferred may thereafter be transferred only to the Participant who originally received the grant or to an individual or trust to whom the Participant would have initially transferred the Award pursuant to this Article XI.  Awards which are transferred pursuant to this Article XI shall be exercisable by the transferee according to the same terms and conditions as applied to the Participant.

 

7



 

ARTICLE XII

AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF THE PLAN

 

The Board may, by resolution, at any time terminate or amend the Plan with respect to any shares of Common Stock or Awards which have not been granted.

 

ARTICLE XIII

EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS

 

Neither the Plan nor any Award hereunder shall create any right on the part of any Employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to continue in such capacity, or shall make anyone an employee.

 

ARTICLE XIV

WITHHOLDING

 

The Company may withhold from any cash payment made under this Plan sufficient amounts to cover any applicable withholding and employment taxes, and if the amount of such cash payment is insufficient, the Company may require the Participant to pay to the Company the amount required to be withheld as a condition to delivering the shares acquired pursuant to an Award.  The Company also may withhold or collect amounts with respect to a disqualifying disposition of shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to exercise of an Incentive Stock Option.

 

The Committee is authorized to adopt rules, regulations or procedures which provide for the satisfaction of a Participant’s tax withholding obligation by the retention of shares of Common Stock to which he otherwise would be entitled pursuant to an Award or by the Participant’s delivery of previously-owned shares of Common Stock or other property.  However, if the Company adopts rules, regulations or procedures which permit withholding obligations to be met by the retention of Common Stock to which a Participant otherwise would be entitled pursuant to an Award, the fair market value of the Common Stock retained for such purpose shall not exceed the minimum required Federal, state and local tax withholding due upon exercise of the Award .

 

ARTICLE XV

EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLAN; TERM

 

15.01       Effective Date of the Plan.  This Plan shall become effective on the Effective Date, and Awards may be granted hereunder as of or after the Effective Date and prior to the termination of the Plan.

 

15.02       Term of Plan.  Unless sooner terminated, this Plan shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) years ending on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date.  Termination of the Plan shall not affect any Awards previously granted and such Awards shall remain valid and in effect until they have been fully exercised or earned, are surrendered or by their terms expire or are forfeited.

 

8



 

ARTICLE XVI

GOVERNING LAW

 

To the extent not governed by Federal law, this Plan shall be construed under the laws of the State of Delaware.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Company has caused a duly authorized officer to execute this Plan, and to apply the Corporate seal hereto as of the 25th day of June, 2012.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

Name:

 

 

 

 

 

Title:

 

 

9




EXHIBIT 21.1

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 

Hyperdynamics Corporation Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiary  Name

 

State  of  Incorporation

 

Location (s)

 

 

 

 

 

HYD Resources Corporation

 

Texas

 

Houston, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

Hyperdynamics Oil & Gas Limited

 

United Kingdom

 

London, England

 

 

 

 

 

SCS  Corporation Ltd

 

Cayman Islands

 

Houston, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

SCS Corporation holds 100% ownership of the following subsidiary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCS Guinea SARL

 

Conakry, Guinea

 

Conakry, Guinea

 




Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-170820 and 333-173051 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-181281, 333-149774 and 333-167486 on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 12, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Hyperdynamics Corporation, and of the effectiveness of Hyperdynamics Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting  (which reports (1) express an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and (2) express an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of Hyperdynamics Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2012.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Houston, Texas

September 12, 2012

 




Exhibit 23.2

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Hyperdynamics Corporation

Houston, Texas

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2008 (File No. 333-149774); the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 24, 2010 (File No. 333-170820); the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2010 (File No. 333-167486); and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2011  (File No. 333-173051); the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2012 (File No. 333-181281), of our report dated September  28, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2010,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation.

 

/s/ GBH CPAs, PC

 

GBH CPAs, PC

www.gbhcpas.com

Houston, Texas

 

September 12, 2012

 




EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Ray Leonard, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: September 12, 2012

 

 

By:

/s/ Ray Leonard

 

 

Ray Leonard

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 




EXHIBIT 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Paul Reinbolt, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: September 12, 2012

 

 

By:

/s/ Paul Reinbolt

 

 

Paul Reinbolt

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 




EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Ray Leonard, Chief Executive Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 12, 2012

 

 

By:

/s/ Ray Leonard

 

 

Ray Leonard

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 




EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Paul Reinbolt, Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 12, 2012

 

 

By:

/s/ Paul Reinbolt

 

 

Paul Reinbolt

 

 

Chief Financial Officer