KAPSTONE PAPER & PACKAGING CORP (Form: 10-K, Received: 03/04/2013 16:11:24)

/s/ ROGER W. STONE

Roger W. Stone

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to ,

Commission File No.: 001-33494

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		20-2699372 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation
1101 Skokie Blvd. Suite 300
Northbrook, IL 60062
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (847) 239-8800

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:

Title of Each Class		Name of Exchange On Which Registered

Common Stock (Par Value $0.0001)		New York Stock Exchange

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of the above in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large Accelerated Filer o		Accelerated Filer ý		Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of the 39,203,571 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 29, 2012, was $641,076,962. This calculation was made using a price per share of Common Stock of $15.85; the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2012 the last day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter of 2012. Solely for purposes of this calculation, all shares held by directors and executive officers of the registrant have been excluded. This exclusion should not be deemed an admission that these individuals are affiliates of the registrant.

On February 25, 2013, the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, excluding 40,000 treasury shares, was 47,477,511.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

The registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of the Form 10-K. Information from such Definitive Proxy Statement will be incorporated by reference into Part III.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Part I
Item 1.	Business	2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	11
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	17
Item 2.	Properties	17
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	18
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	18
Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	18
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	19
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	30
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	31
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	31
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	31
Item 9B.	Other Information	32
Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	32
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	32
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	32
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	33
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	33
Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	33
	SIGNATURES	36
	INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-1

Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, including the risks set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors below, that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "should," "could," "would," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "continue," or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to KapStone or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph. KapStone disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.

PART I

Item 1. Business

KapStone Acquisition History

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation was formed in Delaware as a special purpose acquisition corporation on April 15, 2005 for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an unidentified operating business in the paper, packaging, forest products, and related industries. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to "KapStone," the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and its subsidiaries.

On January 2, 2007, we consummated the purchase from International Paper Company ("IP") of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of the Kraft Papers Business ("KPB") for $155.0 million, less $7.8 million of working capital adjustments. The KPB assets consisted of an unbleached kraft paper manufacturing facility in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, Ride Rite® Converting, an inflatable dunnage bag manufacturer located in Fordyce, Arkansas, trade accounts receivable and inventories. The liabilities assumed consisted of trade accounts payable, accrued expenses, and certain long-term liabilities. We subsequently paid an aggregate of $53.7 million additional purchase price pursuant to contingent earn-out payments based upon achieving certain EBITDA targets.

On July 1, 2008, we consummated the purchase from MeadWestvaco Corporation ("MWV") of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of the Charleston Kraft Division ("CKD") for $485.0 million (net of cash acquired of $10.6 million), less $8.9 million of working capital adjustments. The CKD assets consisted of an unbleached kraft paper manufacturing facility in North Charleston, South Carolina (including a cogeneration facility), chip mills located in Elgin, Hampton, Andrews and Kinards, South Carolina, a lumber mill located in Summerville, South Carolina, trade accounts receivable and inventories. The liabilities assumed consisted of trade accounts payable, accrued expenses and certain long-term liabilities. There was no contingent earn-out for the CKD acquisition.

Table of Contents

On March 31, 2009, we consummated the sale of our dunnage bag business to Illinois Tool Works Inc. for $36.0 million, less $1.1 million of working capital adjustments. The Company considered the sale an opportunity to reduce its debt and focus on its core business.

On October 31, 2011, we acquired U.S. Corrugated Acquisition Inc. ("USC") pursuant to a merger for $330.0 million in cash plus $1.9 million of working capital adjustments. USC owned, at the time of the merger, a recycled containerboard paper mill in Cowpens, South Carolina and fourteen corrugated packaging plants across the eastern and Midwestern United States. The acquisition was financed by cash on hand and a $525.0 million Credit Agreement consisting of a $375.0 million LIBOR based five-year term loan and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility. In connection with the transaction the Company paid off the remaining amount due under its then-existing credit facility. Subsequent to the acquisition, USC and its subsidiaries were reorganized into a single entity and renamed KapStone Container Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation. See Note 3, "USC Acquisition" and Note 9, "Debt" for more information on the USC acquisition and the new senior secured credit facility.

In conjunction with the USC acquisition, the Company evaluated its segment reporting requirements and concluded that it operates in one segment, the integrated manufacture and sale of unbleached kraft paper and corrugated products for industrial and consumer markets.

Future Acquisitions

In an effort to diversify and/or grow our business we have been, and continue to be, engaged in evaluating a number of potential acquisition opportunities. No assurance can be given that we will consummate additional transactions. The structuring and financing of any future acquisitions may be dependent on the terms and availability of additional financing to us that either replaces or does not conflict with the Company's existing senior secured credit facility.

General

KapStone is a producer of unbleached kraft paper products and corrugated products. In 2012 we produced 1,558,111 tons of unbleached kraft paper, of which nearly 77% was sold to third party converters or shipped to our corrugated products manufacturing plants based in the United States and 23% was sold to foreign based customers. With the consummation of the USC acquisition in late 2011 we began manufacturing and selling corrugated products consisting of conventional shipping containers used to protect and transport manufactured goods and multi-color boxes and displays with strong visual appeal that help to merchandise the packaged product in retail locations. In 2012, the corrugating plants produced and sold about 383 million tons or 6.2 billion square feet (BSF) of corrugated products in the U.S. Our net sales in 2012 totaled $1.2 billion, which was comprised of $841.6 million of unbleached kraft paper and $375.0 million of corrugated products.

The Company's business is affected by cyclical industry conditions and general economic conditions in the U.S. and in the countries where we export unbleached kraft paper. These conditions affect the prices which we are able to charge for our products. Our export sales may also be affected by fluctuations in currency values, foreign exchange rates and trade policies and relations.

Industry Overview

We view the unbleached kraft paper market as including containerboard, kraft paper, saturating kraft, unbleached folding carton board and corrugated products.

Table of Contents

Containerboard

Containerboard, consisting of linerboard and medium, is primarily used to manufacture corrugated containers for packaging products. U.S. demand for corrugated boxes and containerboard tends to be driven by industrial production of processed foods, nondurable goods and certain durable goods.

The American Forest and Paper Association's ("AF&PA") estimate of the size of the U.S. containerboard market is as follows:

(In millions)

Total U.S. sales	30.7 tons	30.6 tons	30.6 tons
U.S. production	34.4 tons	34.0 tons	33.9 tons
Imports	0.6 tons	0.8 tons	0.8 tons
Exports	4.3 tons	4.2 tons	4.1 tons
U.S. operating rates	95%	96%	96%

The primary markets for our containerboard are our corrugated products manufacturing plants and independent corrugated and laminated products customers who focus on specialty niche packaging.

Kraft Paper

The AF&PA's estimate of the size of the U.S. kraft paper market is as follows:

(In millions)

Total U.S. sales	1.34 tons	1.39 tons	1.43 tons
U.S. production	1.28 tons	1.32 tons	1.45 tons
Imports	0.16 tons	0.16 tons	0.17 tons
Exports	0.22 tons	0.25 tons	0.21 tons
U.S. operating rates	76%	78%	79%

The kraft paper market is comprised of three general product types. Multiwall paper is used to produce bags for agricultural products, pet food, baking products, cement and chemicals. Specialty converting paper has a large variety of uses within coating and laminating applications that requires a smooth surface and is also used to produce shingle wrap, end caps, roll wrap and dunnage bags. Grocery bag and sack paper is converted into retail shopping bags, grocery sacks and lawn and leaf refuse bags.

Over the last two decades, unbleached kraft paper capacity has declined. This decline has been caused by a decrease in grocery bags and sack paper due to a shift in market demand from paper bags to plastic. The multiwall market also contributed to a decrease in capacity due to conversion to plastics in certain end-use markets, primarily in the insulation, pet food and lawn and garden markets.

Saturating Kraft

Saturating kraft is used in multiple industries around the world, including construction, electronics manufacturing and furniture manufacturing. The major end-use is thin high pressure laminates (HPL), used to create decorative surfaces such as kitchen and bath countertops, home and office furniture and flooring. Within the HPL market there is a growing and distinct HPL segment manufacturing and selling a much thicker product called compact laminates used as surfacing products such as exterior cladding, partitions and doors. In Asia, there is significant use of saturating kraft product for the manufacturing of printed circuit boards (PCB) and copper clad laminates (CCL) and there is also a growing use for thin HPL in decorative surfaces. We are not aware of any published data reporting the size of the saturating kraft market. Barriers to entry for producing high quality saturating kraft are high as it is a technically difficult grade of paper to produce.

Table of Contents

Unbleached Folding Carton Board

Unbleached folding carton board is a low density virgin fiber board. Applications are widely spread throughout end uses in the general folding carton segment of the paperboard packaging market. This product can replace the use of more expensive coated recycled board, coated natural kraft board and solid bleached sulfate board which are currently much larger markets. There is no published data reporting the size of the unbleached, uncoated folding carton market.

Corrugated Products

According to the Fibre Box Association, the value of industry shipments of corrugated products was $26.1 billion in 2012.

The primary end-use markets for corrugated products are shown below (as reported in the most recent Fibre Box Association annual report dated April 2012):


Food, beverages and agricultural products	42	%
General retail and wholesale trade	16	%
Paper products	15	%
Miscellaneous manufacturing	15	%
Petroleum, plastic, synthetic, and rubber products	10	%
Appliances, vehicles, and metal products	2	%

Corrugated products manufacturing plants tend to be located in close proximity to customers to minimize freight costs. The Fibre Box Association estimates that the U.S. corrugated products industry consists of approximately 575 companies and over 1,200 plants.

Manufacturing

We operate three paper mills in the southeastern United States. In 2012, we produced 1,558,111 tons of unbleached kraft paper at our mills in North Charleston, South Carolina, Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina and Cowpens, South Carolina. Currently, our mills operate on a 24 hours a day and seven days a week basis. Fiber used to make unbleached kraft paper is produced from a combination of locally sourced roundwood and woodchips. After the wood is debarked and chipped, the chips are loaded into digesters for cooking. Woodchips, chemicals and steam are mixed in the digester to produce softwood pulp. Hardwood pulp is produced in North Charleston in a similar fashion for the production of DuraSorb® saturating kraft. The pulp is screened and washed through a series of washers, and then stored prior to the paper making process. Old corrugated containers ("OCC") are used to make recycled containerboard in Cowpens. The Company processes pulp using six paper machines at our facilities. Management monitors productivity on a real-time basis with on-line reporting tools that track production values versus targets. Overall equipment efficiency is also monitored daily through production reporting systems.

As of December 31, 2012 we operated 14 corrugated products manufacturing plants, comprised of six box plants, six sheet plants, and two sheet feeder plants. Box plants operate as combining operations that manufacture corrugated sheets and finished corrugated products. Sheet feeder plants have a corrugator machine and manufacture corrugated sheets which are shipped to sheet or box plants. Sheet plants have various machines which convert corrugated sheets, purchased either from our operations or third parties, into finished corrugated products. Plants with a corrugating machine have total capacity of approximately nine billion square feet ("BSF"). In January 2013 we announced that we are opening a new sheet plant in Aurora, Illinois.

Our corrugated manufacturing plants operate in nine states in the U.S., with no manufacturing facilities outside of the continental U.S. Each corrugated plant, for the most part, serves a market

Table of Contents

radius that typically averages 200 miles. Our sheet plants are generally located in close proximity to our larger corrugated plants, which enables us to offer additional services and converting capabilities such as small volume and quick turnaround items.

We produce a wide variety of products ranging from basic corrugated shipping containers to specialized packaging. We also have multi-color printing capabilities to make high-impact graphics boxes and displays that offer customers such as consumer products companies more attractive packaging.

We have dedicated personnel who coordinate and execute all containerboard trade agreements with other containerboard manufacturers. It is industry practice to "trade" among industry participants who are located more closely to converting plants in order to reduce freight costs.

Distribution

Unbleached kraft paper produced in our mills is shipped by rail or truck to customers in the U.S. and is shipped by truck to nearby ports and then by ocean vessel to our export customers. Domestic rail shipments represent about 47% of the tons shipped and the remaining 53% is shipped by truck.

Our corrugated products are delivered by truck. Most of our plants have their own fleet of trucks as our customers demand timely service.

Sales and Marketing

Our unbleached kraft paper marketing strategy is to sell our products to third party converters and manufacturers of industrial and consumer packaging products. We seek to meet the quality and service needs of the customers of our corrugated operations at the most efficient cost, while balancing those needs against the demands of our containerboard customers.

We sell our products directly to end users and converters, as well as through sales agents. Our sales groups are responsible for the sale of these products to third party converters in the U.S. Sales to export markets are managed by separate teams of which certain personnel are based in Europe and Asia.

Our corrugated products are sold through an internal sales and marketing organization. We have sales representatives and sales managers who serve local and regional accounts. We also have corporate account managers who serve large national accounts at multiple customer locations. Our corrugated operations focus on supplying both high-volume commodity products and specialized packaging with high value graphics.

Customers and Products

The following represents the Company's tons of products sold:

	2012					2011

Product Line:	Tons		% of Total			Tons		% of Total
Containerboard		690,503		41.1	%		672,933		49.1	%
Corrugated products		383,415		22.8	%		57,186		4.2	%
Kraft paper		250,280		14.9	%		275,461		20.1	%
DuraSorb®		253,239		15.1	%		266,571		19.5	%
Kraftpak®		103,028		6.1	%		96,947		7.1	%

Tons of product sold		1,680,465					1,369,098

KapStone has over 2000 U.S.-based and over 200 export customers.

Table of Contents

Containerboard is sold to domestic and foreign converters in the corrugated packaging industry and to other converters for a variety of uses including laminated tier sheets and wrapping material, among others. Historically, our focus is on independent converters who do not have their own mill systems or converters who otherwise commonly purchase containerboard in the open market. Prior to the acquisition, USC had been a containerboard customer of ours. The USC acquisition provided us with vertical integration opportunities and we expect to increase the amount of KapStone containerboard produced in our acquired corrugated manufacturing plants.

Kraft paper is sold primarily to domestic converters who produce multiwall bags for agricultural products, pet food, cement and chemicals, grocery bags and specialty conversion products such as wrapping paper products, dunnage bags and roll wrap.

Our saturating kraft paper, sold under the trade name Durasorb® has a customer base which is split among three geographic regions, the Americas, Europe and Asia. Approximately 77 percent of our sales are exports to customers in Europe, Latin America and Asia where growth opportunities are favorable. KapStone, or its predecessor, has done business with many of these customers for well over 40 years. Some customers have consolidated to form a greater presence in their end-use markets. Customer consolidation is particularly evident in North America and is in the early phase in Europe. In Asia, there are numerous players and it is a highly fragmented market making entry difficult for some companies that do not have a presence in the region. KapStone has acquired a leadership position with our Durasorb® product through knowledge of our markets and understanding the technical needs of our customers' manufacturing processes and the demanding requirements of their products.

Our unbleached folding carton board sold under the Kraftpak® trade name has a customer base which consists primarily of integrated and independent converters in the folding carton industry. Our unbleached folding carton board product is a unique, low density virgin fiber board. KapStone believes that the best growth opportunities for Kraftpak® are in consumer brands that are changing their images to promote environmental friendliness and sustainability. Kraftpak® and similar products replace the use of coated recycled board, coated natural kraft board and solid bleached sulfate board which are currently much larger markets.

As part of the 2011 USC acquisition we have about 1,000 corrugated product customers, most of which are regional and local accounts, which are broadly diversified across industries and geographic locations. In addition, we have a select number of national accounts, or those customers with a national presence. These national customers typically purchase corrugated products from several of our box plants throughout the United States. In 2012 we sold approximately 383 million tons or 6.2 billion square feet of corrugated products.

No customer accounts for more than 10% of consolidated net sales. Our business is not dependent upon a single customer or upon a small number of major customers. We do not believe the loss of any one customer would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Backlog

Demand for our major product lines is relatively constant throughout the year, and seasonal fluctuations in marketing, production, shipments and inventories are not significant. Backlogs are a factor in the industry as it allows paper mills to run more efficiently. Most orders are placed for delivery within 30 days.

Major Raw Materials Used

Fiber is the single largest cost in the manufacture of containerboard and unbleached kraft paper. KapStone consumes both wood fiber and recycled fiber in its paper mills. Our mills in North Charleston and Roanoke Rapids use 100% virgin fiber. Fiber used to make unbleached kraft paper is

Table of Contents

produced from a combination of locally sourced roundwood and woodchips. We rely on supply agreements and open market purchases to supply these mills with roundwood and wood chips. Fiber resources are generally available within economic proximity to these mills and we have not experienced any significant difficulty in obtaining our mill fiber needs.

Our mill in Cowpens, South Carolina is a 100% recycled mill, whose fiber consumption consists solely of recycled fiber commonly referred to as OCC. We obtain OCC pursuant to certain supply agreements and in open market purchases from suppliers within economic proximity to the Cowpens Mill. OCC has historically exhibited significant price volatility. The Cowpens mill has not experienced any significant difficulty in obtaining OCC.

Our corrugated manufacturing plants consume containerboard from our mills and from third parties. We use third party mills which are closer to our corrugated manufacturing plants to realize freight savings. Containerboard, which includes both linerboard and corrugating medium, is the principal raw material used to manufacture corrugated products. Linerboard is used as the inner and outer facings, or liners, of corrugated products. Corrugating medium is fluted and laminated to linerboard in corrugated plants to produce corrugated sheets. The sheets are subsequently printed, cut, folded and glued into produce corrugated products.

Energy

Energy at the mills is obtained through purchased electricity or through various fuels, which are converted to steam or electricity on-site. Fuel sources include coal, natural gas, oil, bark, and by-products of the manufacturing and pulping process, including black liquor. These fuels are burned in boilers to produce steam. Steam turbine generators are used to produce electricity. To reduce our mill energy cost, we have invested in processes and equipment to ensure a high level of purchased fuel flexibility. In recent history, fuel oil has exhibited higher costs per thermal unit and more price volatility than natural gas and coal. During 2012, approximately 56% of our mills' purchased fuel needs were from coal, historically our lowest cost purchased fuel.

We purchase coal under three contracts with fixed pricing through December 31, 2013.

KapStone's corrugated product manufacturing plants primarily use boilers that produce steam which are used to power the corrugating machines. The majority of these boilers burn natural gas, although some also have the ability to burn fuel oil. Sheet plants use electricity for their main source of power.

Competition

The markets in which we sell our products are highly competitive and comprised of many participants. We face significant competitors, including large, vertically integrated companies and numerous smaller companies.

Our principal competitors with respect to sales of our unbleached kraft paper are a number of large, diversified paper companies, including International Paper Company, Georgia-Pacific (owned by Koch Industries, Inc.), Rock-Tenn Corporation and Packaging Corporation of America, all of which have greater financial resources than we do. We also compete with other regional manufacturers of these products. Our unbleached kraft paper products (other than our Durasorb® and Kraftpak® products) are each generally considered a commodity-type product and can be purchased from numerous suppliers and competition is based primarily on price.

Corrugated products businesses seek to differentiate themselves through pricing, quality, service and product design and innovation. We compete for both local and national account business, and we compete against producers of other types of packaging products. On a national level, our primary competitors include International Paper Company, Georgia-Pacific (owned by Koch Industries, Inc.),

Table of Contents

Rock-Tenn Corporation and Packaging Corporation of America. However, with our strategic focus on local and regional accounts, we also compete with the smaller, independent converters.

Intellectual Property

The Company owns patents, licenses, trademarks and trade names on products. However, we do not believe that our intellectual property is material to our business and the loss of any or our intellectual property rights would not have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.

Employees

As of December 31, 2012, we have 2,760 employees. Of these, 842 employees are salaried and 1,918 are hourly. Approximately 1,400 of our hourly employees are represented by unions. The majority of our unionized employees are represented by the United Steel Workers (USW).

Currently, there is a collective bargaining agreement in place with union employees in Roanoke Rapids through August 2013. The Company is engaged in negotiations with its union employees in North Charleston. The mill is operating under the terms of a contract that expired in July 2012. We expect to begin negotiations to renew the Roanoke Rapids union contract soon.

During 2012, we experienced no work stoppages and have experienced no instances of significant work stoppages in the five years prior to 2012. We believe we have good relations with our employees.

Environmental Matters

Compliance with environmental requirements is a significant factor in our business operations. We commit substantial resources to maintaining environmental compliance and managing environmental risk. We are subject to, and must comply with, a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws, particularly those relating to air and water quality and waste disposal. The most significant of these laws affecting us are:

1.: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
2.: Clean Water Act (CWA)
3.: Clean Air Act (CAA)
4.: The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know-Act (EPCRA)
5.: Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA)
6.: Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)

We believe that we are currently in material compliance with these and all applicable environmental rules and regulations. Because environmental regulations are constantly evolving, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs to maintain compliance with these and other environmental laws and regulations. We work diligently to anticipate and budget for the impact of applicable environmental regulations, and do not currently expect that future environmental compliance obligations will materially affect our business or financial condition. Total capital costs for environmental matters were $0.1 million for 2012. We currently estimate 2013 environmental capital expenditures will be less than $1.0 million.

We do not believe that any ongoing remedial projects are material in nature. As of December 31, 2012, we maintained an environmental reserve of $1.9 million, which includes funds relating to on-site landfill and surface impoundments for our landfill obligations, which are accounted for in accordance

Table of Contents

with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations . We believe these reserves are adequate.

We could also incur environmental liabilities as a result of claims by third parties for civil damages, including liability for personal injury or property damage, arising from releases of hazardous substances or contamination. We are not aware of any material claims of this type currently pending against us.

While legislation regarding the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions has been proposed at the federal level, it is uncertain whether such legislation will be passed and, if so, what the breadth and scope of such legislation will be. The result of the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions could be an increase in our future environmental compliance costs, through caps, taxes or additional capital expenditures to modify facilities, which may be material. However, climate change legislation and the resulting future energy policy could also provide us with opportunities if the use of renewable energy is encouraged. We currently generate a significant portion of our power requirements for our mills using bark, black liquor and biomass as fuel, which are derived from renewable resources. While we believe we are well-positioned to take advantage of any renewable energy incentives, it is uncertain what the ultimate costs and opportunities of any climate change legislation will be and how our business and industry will be affected.

In 2004, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") published the Boiler MACT regulations, establishing air emissions standards and certain other requirements for industrial boilers. These regulations were vacated and remanded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2007. The EPA proposed final regulations in March 2011, which would require compliance in 2014. During 2011, the EPA determined that it would reconsider certain provisions of the Boiler MACT regulations and, in December 2011, the EPA published proposed rules containing changes to the March 2011 rules. The EPA stayed a portion of the Boiler MACT regulations during its reconsideration process, but this stay was vacated by a federal district court in January 2012. In December 2012, the EPA made final changes to the March 2011version of the Boiler MACT regulations, extending certain federal compliance requirements. These regulations could require modifications to one boiler at our mill in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina. Based upon the Company's current understanding of the regulation, its current estimate for total cost of compliance is estimated at a range of $2.0 million to $3.0 million.

In addition to Boiler MACT and greenhouse gas standards, the EPA has recently finalized a number of other environmental rules, which may impact the pulp and paper industry. The EPA also is revising existing environmental standards and developing several new rules that may apply to the industry in the future. We cannot currently predict with certainty how any future changes in environmental laws, regulations and/or enforcement practices will affect our business; however, it is possible that our compliance, capital expenditure requirements and operating costs could increase materially.

Available Information

We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished as required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, through our Internet Website (www.kapstonepaper.com) as soon as is reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained in or incorporated into our Internet Website is not incorporated by reference herein.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, in evaluating us and our business before making an investment decision regarding our securities. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risk factors were to actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The risks listed below are not the only risks that we face.

Risks associated with our business

Conditions in the global capital and credit markets and the economy generally may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial position and we do not expect these conditions to improve materially in the near future.

Our results of operations and financial position could be materially affected by adverse changes in the global capital and credit markets and the economy generally, including recent declines in consumer and business confidence and spending, both in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world. The capital and credit experienced extreme volatility and disruption in the recent past and, while generally more stable now, could experience such volatility and disruptions again—particularly due to sovereign debt and related issues in Europe. Credit market dislocations can result in significant reduction in availability of liquidity and credit and increased the costs of credit when such credit is available. Conditions in the capital and credit markets and the effects of the declines in consumer and business confidence and spending may adversely impact the ability of our lenders, suppliers and customers to conduct their business activities. The consequences of such adverse effects could include the interruption of production at the facilities of our customers, the reduction, delay or cancellation of customer orders, delays in or the inability of customers to obtain financing to purchase our products, and bankruptcy of customers or other creditors. Moreover, the current worldwide financial crisis has in the past, and could in the future reduce the availability of liquidity and credit to fund or support the continuation and expansion of business operations worldwide.

While we have procedures to monitor and limit exposure to credit risk, there can be no assurance such procedures will effectively limit our credit risk and avoid losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows and financial position.

We rely on key customers and a loss of one or more of our key customers could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, no customer accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated net sales. However, losses of key customers could significantly impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

We are dependent upon key management executives the loss of whom may adversely impact our business.

We depend on the expertise, experience and continued services of corporate and mill management. The loss of such management, or an inability to attract or retain other key individuals, could materially adversely affect our business. There can be no assurance that our salaries and incentive compensation plans will allow us to retain the services of these key management executives or hire new key employees.

Our indebtedness may adversely affect our financial health.

As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately $368.8 million of outstanding debt. As a result of the indebtedness, our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes may be impaired in the future. The debt could make

Table of Contents

us vulnerable to economic downturns and may hinder our ability to adjust to rapidly changing market conditions.

A significant portion of our cash flow from operations will be needed to meet the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness. The business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to enable it to repay our indebtedness and to fund other liquidity needs, including capital expenditure requirements. The indebtedness incurred by us under our senior secured credit facility bears interest at variable rates, and therefore if interest rates increase, our debt service requirements would increase. In such case, we may need to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the senior secured credit facility, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we cannot service or refinance our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

Our senior secured credit facility contains restrictive covenants that limit our liquidity and corporate activities, including our ability to pursue additional acquisitions. Our credit facility imposes operating and financial restrictions that limit our ability to:

•: incur additional indebtedness;
•: create additional liens on our assets;
•: make investments;
•: engage in mergers or acquisitions;
•: pay dividends; and
•: sell all or any substantial part of our assets.

In addition, our senior secured credit facility also imposes other restrictions on us. Therefore, we would need to seek permission from the lenders in order to engage in certain corporate actions. The lenders' interests may be different from ours, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain the lenders' permission when needed. This may prevent us from taking actions that are in our best interest.

Our senior secured credit facility requires us to maintain certain financial ratios. The failure to maintain the specified ratios could result in an event of default if not cured or waived.

In the event of a default under our senior secured credit facility, the lenders generally would be able to declare all of such indebtedness, together with accrued interest, to be due and payable. In addition, borrowings under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of our assets and, in the event of a default under that facility the lenders generally would be entitled to seize the collateral. A default under any debt instrument, unless cured or waived, would likely have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

If we fail to extend or renegotiate the collective bargaining agreements as they expire from time to time, or if our unionized employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially harmed.

Most of our hourly paid employees are represented by trade unions. We are a party to collective bargaining contracts which apply to approximately 600 employees at the North Charleston mill, 400 employees at various corrugating manufacturing locations, and 400 employees at the Roanoke Rapids mill. No assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully extend or renegotiate the collective bargaining agreements as they expire from time to time. Currently, there is a collective bargaining agreement in effect with respect to Roanoke Rapids through August 2013. The North Charleston union

Table of Contents

contract expired in July of 2012 and remains under negotiations. If we are unable to extend or negotiate new agreements without work stoppages, it could negatively impact our ability to manufacture our products and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our operations are global in nature, and accordingly our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position could be adversely affected by the political and economic conditions of the countries in which we conduct business, by fluctuations in exchange rates and other factors related to our international operations.

Approximately 23 percent and 35 percent, respectively, of each of our 2012 and 2011 revenues were derived from export sales. Our international operations and activities face increasing exposure to the risks of selling to customers in foreign countries. These factors include:

•: Changes in foreign currency exchange rates which could adversely affect selling prices for our products, and therefore our competitive position in a particular market.
•: Trade protection measures in favor of local producers of competing products, including government subsidies, tax benefits, trade actions (such as anti-dumping proceedings) and other measures giving local producers a competitive advantage over the Company.
•: Changes generally in political, regulatory or economic conditions in the countries in which we conduct business.

These risks could affect the cost of selling our products, our pricing, sales volume, and ultimately our financial performance. The likelihood of such occurrences and their potential effect on the Company vary from country to country and are unpredictable.

We may be required to record a charge to our earnings if our goodwill becomes impaired.

We test for impairment of goodwill annually in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value for such assets may not be recoverable, we review goodwill for impairment on an interim basis. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances requiring our interim testing include a decline in stock price as compared to our book value per share, future cash flows and slower growth rates. In connection with future annual or interim tests, we may be required to record a non-cash charge to earnings during the period in which any impairment of goodwill is determined, which would adversely impact our results of operations.

See Note 2. "Significant Accounting Policies—Goodwill and Intangible Assets" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to testing for impairment of goodwill.

Our business depends on effective information management systems.

We rely on our enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to support such critical business operations as processing sales orders and invoicing, inventory control, purchasing and supply chain management, payroll and human resources, and financial reporting. We periodically implement upgrades to such systems or migrate one or more of our affiliates, facilities or operations from one system to another. If we are unable to adequately maintain such systems to support our developing business requirements or effectively manage any upgrade or migration, we could encounter difficulties that could have a material adverse impact on our business, internal controls over financial reporting, financial results, or our ability to timely and accurately report such results.

Table of Contents

We are subject to cyber-security risks related to certain customer, employee, vendor or other company data.

We use information technologies to securely manage operations and various business functions. We rely upon various technologies to process, store and report on our business and interact with customers, vendors and employees. Despite our security design and controls, and those of our third party providers, we could become subject to cyber attacks which could result in operational disruptions or the misappropriation of sensitive data. There can be no assurance that such disruptions or misappropriations and the resulting repercussions will not be material to our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

We may incur business disruptions.

We take measures to minimize the risks of disruptions at our manufacturing facilities. However, the occurrence of a natural disaster, such as a hurricane, tropical storm, earthquake, tornado, flood, fire or other unanticipated problems such as labor difficulties, equipment failure or unscheduled maintenance could cause operational disruptions and could materially adversely affect our earnings and cash flows. Any losses due to these events may not be covered by our existing insurance policies or may be subject to certain deductibles.

Environmental regulations could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

We are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state, and local authorities in the United States, including requirements that regulate discharge into the environment, waste management, and remediation of environmental contamination. Maintaining compliance with existing and new environmental laws may require capital expenditures.

Due to past history of industrial operations at the Roanoke Rapids and North Charleston mills, the possibility of onsite and offsite environmental impact to the soil and groundwater may present a heightened risk of contamination. If we are required to make significant expenditures for remediation, the costs of such efforts may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

MWV retained responsibility for certain offsite environmental conditions resulting from the operations at the North Charleston mill existing prior to the closing of the CKD acquisition. The overall indemnification by MWV for certain losses includes assumed environmental liabilities, subject to an $8.5 million threshold and a cap equal to 15 percent of the purchase price of $485 million. MWV's obligation to indemnify us for any historical onsite liability or breach of certain environmental representations and warranties terminates on December 31, 2013. MWV's indemnification for certain offsite historical liabilities survive indefinitely. Because we are unable to presently make a determination as to whether the environmental impact, if any, would be widespread or significant, the negotiated cap and survival period may not be sufficient to cover future losses.

Our operations are dependent upon certain operating agreements for fiber.

We rely on certain supply arrangements to provide us roundwood and woodchips. If one of these suppliers suffered a setback, KapStone's supply of roundwood and woodchips may not be adequate to cover customer needs.

Risks Associated with KapStone's Common Stock

The market price for our common stock may be highly volatile.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile due to certain factors, including, but not limited to; quarterly fluctuations in our financial and operating results; general conditions in the paper and packaging industries; or changes in earnings estimates.

Table of Contents

Shares available for future issuance, conversion and exercise could have an adverse effect on the earnings per share and the market price of our common stock.

Any future issuance of equity securities, including shares issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options, could dilute the interests of our existing stockholders and could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our executive officers and directors control a substantial percentage, approximately 13.9%, of our common stock and thus may influence certain actions requiring a stockholder vote.

At December 31, 2012, our executive officers and directors owned 6.6 million shares of our common stock, or approximately 13.9 percent of our total outstanding common stock. Accordingly, our executive officers and directors may have some influence over the outcome of all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including future acquisitions and the election of directors. In addition, our board of directors is divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. At the annual meeting, as a consequence of our "staggered" board of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for election and our officers and directors, because of their ownership position, will have some influence regarding the outcome of the election.

Risks associated with the paper, packaging, forest products and related industries

The paper, packaging, forest products and related industries are highly cyclical. Fluctuations in the prices of and the demand for products could result in smaller profit margins and lower sales volumes.

Historically, economic and market shifts, fluctuations in capacity and changes in foreign currency exchange rates have created cyclical changes in prices, sales volume and margins for products in the paper, packaging, forest products and related industries. The length and magnitude of industry cycles have varied over time and by product, but generally reflect changes in macroeconomic conditions and levels of industry capacity. Most paper products and many wood products used in the packaging industry are commodities that are widely available from many producers. Because commodity products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition for these products is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand. The overall levels of demand for these commodity products reflect fluctuations in levels of end-user demand, which depend in large part on general macroeconomic conditions in North America and regional economic conditions in our markets (including Europe, Asia, and Central and South America), as well as foreign currency exchange rates. The foregoing factors could materially and adversely impact our sales and profitability and results of operations.

Difficulty obtaining wood fiber at favorable prices, or at all, may negatively impact companies in the paper and packaging industry.

Wood fiber (including OCC) is the principal raw material in many parts of the paper and packaging industry. Wood fiber is a commodity, and prices historically have been cyclical. Environmental litigation and regulatory developments have caused, and may cause in the future, significant reductions in the amount of timber available for commercial harvest in the United States. In addition, future domestic or foreign legislation and litigation concerning the use of timberlands, the protection of endangered species, the promotion of forest health and the response to and prevention of catastrophic wildfires could also affect timber supplies. Availability of harvested timber may further be limited by fire, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, flooding and other causes, thereby reducing supply and increasing prices. Demand for OCC, especially from China, could result in shortages or spikes in the cost of OCC.

Table of Contents

Industry supply of commodity paper and wood products is also subject to fluctuation, as changing industry conditions can influence producers to idle or permanently close individual machines or entire mills. In addition, to avoid substantial cash costs in connection with idling or closing a mill, some producers will choose to continue to operate at a loss, sometimes even a cash loss, which could prolong weak pricing environments due to oversupply. Oversupply in these markets can also result from producers introducing new capacity in response to favorable short-term pricing trends. Industry supply of commodity papers and wood products is also influenced by overseas production capacity, which has grown in recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Wood fiber pricing is subject to regional market influences, and the cost of wood fiber may increase in particular regions due to market shifts in those regions. In addition, the ability to obtain wood fiber from foreign countries may be impacted by economic, legal and political conditions in those countries as well as transportation difficulties.

An increase in the cost of purchased energy and raw materials would lead to higher manufacturing costs, thereby reducing margins which would have an adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

Energy is a significant input cost for the paper and packaging industry. Increases in energy prices can be expected to adversely impact businesses. Energy prices, particularly for electricity, coal and fuel oil, have been volatile in recent years and currently coal and electricity prices exceed historical averages. These fluctuations have historically impacted manufacturing costs of companies in the industry, often contributing to reduced margins and increased earnings volatility. In addition, we could be materially adversely impacted by supply disruptions or the inability to pass on cost increases to our customers.

Paper and packaging companies face strong competition.

We face competition from numerous competitors, domestic as well as foreign. Some of our competitors will be large, vertically integrated companies that have greater financial and other resources, greater manufacturing economies of scale, greater energy self-sufficiency and/or lower operating costs.

Certain paper and wood products are vulnerable to long-term declines in demand due to competing technologies or materials.

Companies in the paper and packaging industry are subject to possible declines in demand for their products as the use of alternative materials and technologies grows and the prices of such alternatives become more competitive. Any substantial shift in demand from wood and paper products to competing technologies or materials could result in a material decrease in sales of our products and could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. We cannot ensure that any efforts we might undertake to adapt our product offerings to such changes would be successful or sufficient.

Paper and packaging companies are subject to significant environmental regulation and environmental compliance expenditures, as well as other potential environmental liabilities.

Companies in the paper and packaging industry are subject to a wide range of general and industry specific environmental laws and regulations, particularly with respect to air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste management, site remediation, forestry operations and endangered species habitats. We may incur substantial expenditures to maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations could expose us to civil or criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including orders limiting operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of pollution control equipment or other remedial actions.

Table of Contents

Risks Associated with Acquisitions

We may fail to realize the anticipated synergies and cost savings expected from the USC acquisition.

Our success after the USC acquisition will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated $8.0 million of growth opportunities and synergies, and $8.0 million of cost savings from integrating our business with USC. To realize these anticipated benefits, we must successfully integrate our business with USC in a manner that permits these synergies to be realized. If we are not able to successfully achieve these objectives, such anticipated benefits may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.

Future acquisitions of businesses by us would subject us to additional business, operating and industry risks, the impact of which cannot presently be evaluated, and could adversely impact our capital structure.

We intend to pursue other acquisition opportunities in an effort to diversify our investments and/or grow our business. Any business acquired by us may cause us to be affected by numerous risks inherent in the acquired business' operations. If we acquire a business in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we may be adversely affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. We cannot ensure that we would be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors with any such acquisitions.

In addition, the financing of any acquisition completed by us could adversely impact our capital structure as any such financing would likely include the issuance of additional equity securities and/or the borrowing of additional funds. The issuance of additional equity securities may significantly reduce the equity interest of our stockholders and/or adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock. Increasing our indebtedness could increase the risk of a default that would entitle the holder to declare all of such indebtedness due and payable and/or to seize any collateral securing the indebtedness. In addition, default under one debt instrument could in turn permit lenders under other debt instruments to declare borrowings outstanding under those other instruments to be due and payable pursuant to cross default clauses. Accordingly, the financing of future acquisitions could adversely impact our capital structure and the value of your equity interest in us.

Except as required by law or the rules of any securities exchange on which our securities might be listed at the time we seek to consummate a subsequent acquisition, stockholders will not be asked to vote on any such proposed acquisition and no redemption rights in connection with any such acquisition will exist.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The table below provides a summary of our paper mills, the principal products produced and each mill's annual practical maximum capacity based upon all of our paper machines' production capabilities, as reported to the AF&PA:

Location	Products

North Charleston, SC	Unbleached Kraft	870,000
Roanoke Rapids, NC	Unbleached Kraft	440,000
Cowpens, SC	Recycled containerboard	240,000

Total		1,550,000

Table of Contents

We have granted mortgages on all of our owned real property, including our paper mills, to secure our obligations under our senior secured credit facility.

We own three of our 14 corrugated manufacturing plants. These plants are located in Georgia, Texas and Massachusetts and total 0.5 million square feet. The remaining 11 plant locations are leased. These plants are located in Georgia, New York, Kentucky, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and Texas and total 2.1 million square feet. The majority of these leases expire in 2032. The equipment in the leased facilities is, in virtually all cases, owned by KapStone, except for forklifts, trailers and other rolling stock which are leased.

We currently lease space for our corporate headquarters in Northbrook, Illinois. The lease for this facility expires in 2020.

We currently believe that our owned and leased space for facilities and properties are sufficient to meet our operating requirements for the foreseeable future.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are from time to time subject to various administrative and legal investigations, claims and proceedings incidental to our business, including environmental and safety matters, labor and employments matters, personal injury claims, contractual disputes and taxes. We establish reserves for claims and proceedings when it is probable that liabilities exist and where reasonable estimates can be made. We also maintain insurance that may limit our financial exposure for defense costs, as well as liability, if any, for claims covered by the insurance (subject also to deductibles and self-insurance amounts). While any investigation, claim or proceeding has an element of uncertainty, and we cannot predict or assure the outcome of any claim or proceeding involving the Company, we believe the outcome of any pending or threatened claim or proceeding (other than those that cannot be assessed due to their preliminary nature), or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol KS. As of December 31, 2012, the number of beneficial holders of record of our common stock was 5,980.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales price information for the Company's common stock from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, as reported by the NYSE.

	2012				2011

Quarter Ended	Low		High		Low		High
March 31	$	16.05	$	21.24	$	15.08	$	17.80
June 30	$	15.11	$	19.93	$	14.37	$	17.63
September 30	$	15.26	$	22.39	$	12.66	$	17.28
December 31	$	19.54	$	23.06	$	13.18	$	17.88

In November 2012 the Company's board of directors approved a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share. The dividend was paid in December 2012. There were no cash dividends or other cash

Table of Contents

distributions made by us during the fiscal years 2011 or 2010. The Company does not currently have plans to pay any additional dividends.

At December 31, 2012, the closing share price on the NYSE was $22.19. The value of Company stock as of December 31, 2012 includes the downward adjustment in the Company's stock price on the ex-dividend date equal to the $2.00 per share special cash dividend payable to all shareholders of record as of December 10, 2012.

Stock Performance Graph

The performance graph shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended.

The following graph compares a $100 investment in Company stock on December 31, 2007 with a $100 investment in each of the S&P 500 and the S&P Paper and Packaging Index (the Company's peer group) also made on December 31, 2007. The graph portrays total return, 2007-2012, assuming reinvestment of dividends.

Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
December 2012

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth KapStone's selected financial information derived from its audited consolidated financial statements as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

The selected financial data presented below summarizes certain financial data which has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis

Table of Contents

of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and KapStone's audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.

	Years Ended December 31,

In thousands, except per share amounts	2012		2011		2010		2009		2008
Statement of Income Data :
Net sales(1)	$	1,216,637	$	906,119	$	782,676	$	632,478	$	524,549
Operating income(2)	$	109,560	$	106,741	$	68,703	$	151,362	$	50,656
Net income(3)	$	62,505	$	123,981	$	65,041	$	80,280	$	19,665
Basic net income per share	$	1.34	$	2.68	$	1.42	$	2.32	$	0.74
Diluted net income per share	$	1.31	$	2.61	$	1.38	$	2.29	$	0.57
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,488	$	8,062	$	67,358	$	2,440	$	4,165
Total assets	$	1,131,167	$	1,124,354	$	719,727	$	669,123	$	727,190
Long-term liabilities	$	414,628	$	442,269	$	185,539	$	213,637	$	419,545
Total stockholders' equity	$	517,948	$	546,278	$	418,634	$	348,790	$	180,767

(1): 2011 results and later reflect the USC acquisition on October 31, 2011. 2008 results and later reflect the CKD acquisition from MeadWestvaco on July 1, 2008.
(2): 2009 operating income includes $164.0 million of alternative fuel mixture credits and $16.4 million from the gain on the sale of the dunnage bag business.
(3): 2011 net income includes a $63.0 million benefit from the reversal of the tax reserve for alternative fuel mixture credits. 2010 net income includes a $21.0 million cellulosic biofuel producers' tax credit.

See Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for USC acquisition footnote.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary

We have consummated three acquisitions since January 2007, including the USC acquisition consummated on October 31, 2011, as we drive towards our strategic objective of being a $2 billion revenue company by 2015. We continue to evaluate additional acquisition opportunities.

Our mill operations had a strong year in 2012, producing a record 1.56 million tons of unbleached kraft paper compared to 1.35 million tons in 2011. Net sales in 2012 of $1.2 billion reflect 1.7 million tons of product sold. Average selling prices for 2012 decreased by $5 per ton to $622. This decrease was a result of lower export containerboard and domestic kraft paper prices partially offset by a partial realization of our fourth quarter 2012 $50 per ton containerboard price increase.

Some key highlights for 2012 include:

•: In June, we made a $50.0 million voluntary prepayment of principal on our term loan using cash flow from operations.
•: In August, we announced a $50 per ton selling price increase for domestic containerboard and an 8 and 10 percent increase for corrugated packaging boxes and sheets, respectively. These price increases were partially realized during the fourth quarter of 2012 and will be fully realized by mid 2013.
•: In September we announced a plan to invest $29.0 million in our North Charleston, South Carolina paper mill to upgrade No. 3 paper machine and selected equipment in the fiber and

Table of Contents

utilities areas. This investment will increase capacity for ultra high performance linerboard grades.

•: In October we migrated 12 of 14 locations included in the USC acquisition to a common ERP platform.
•: In November our Board of Directors approved a $2.00 per share special cash dividend which we paid on December 20, 2012.
•: In November we amended our Credit Agreement to, among other things, include a lower interest rate and a one year extension of our $131.3 million final principal payment to November 28, 2017.

In January 2013, the Company announced the future opening a new manufacturing facility in Aurora, IL. The 192,000 square foot facility located 40 miles west of the city of Chicago will produce corrugated packaging and will also include a design lab and a technical center. The Company expects to invest approximately $8 to $10 million in the first phase and will begin production at the new facility in March of 2013.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010

The following table compares results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Year Ended December 31,

									% of Net Sales
						% Change			% of Net Sales
($ in thousands)	2012		2011			% Change			2012			2011
Net sales	$	1,216,637	$	906,119			34.3	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization		866,124		628,613			37.8	%		71.2			69.4
Depreciation and amortization		63,124		51,036			23.7	%		5.2			5.6
Freight and distribution expenses		108,438		79,643			36.2	%		8.9			8.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses		70,055		41,265			69.8	%		5.8			4.6
Other operating income		664		1,179			(43.7	)%		(0.1	)		(0.1	)

Operating income		109,560		106,741			2.6	%		9.0			11.8
Foreign exchange loss		303		319			(5.0	)%		—			—
Interest expense, net		11,774		6,081			93.6	%		1.0			0.7

Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes		97,483		100,341			(2.8	)%		8.0			11.1
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		34,978		(23,640	)		(248.0	)%		2.9			(2.6	)

Net income	$	62,505	$	123,981			(49.6	)%		5.1	%		13.7	%

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $1,216.6 million compared to $906.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $310.5 million or 34.3 percent. The increase in net sales was driven by the USC acquisition which accounted for $330.6 million of net sales. Excluding the USC acquisition, net sales decreased by $20.1 million due to $21.4 million of lower volume of paper sales as the Company used more tons for internal consumption rather than selling to third parties, $4.8 million in lower average selling prices, $4.0 million due to the unfavorable exchange rate effect of a stronger US dollar and $2.2 million due to a less favorable product mix, partially offset by $12.3 million of higher lumber and other sales. Average selling price per ton for 2012 was $622 compared to $627 for 2011. Average selling prices decreased primarily due to a $45 per ton reduction in export containerboard prices and product mix, partially offset by the partial realization of a $50 per ton containerboard price increase late in 2012.

Table of Contents

Average selling prices per ton of paper are expected to increase in 2013 as a $50 per ton containerboard increase will be in place the entire year. The price increase was not fully implemented until the end of the fourth quarter in 2012. In addition, average selling prices for corrugated products are expected to increase in 2013 for the same reason.

The following represents the Company's tons of products sold:

	Year Ended December 31,

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase/ (Decrease)
Product Line (in tons):	2012		2011		Increase/ (Decrease)			%
Domestic containerboard		480,406		415,112		65,294			15.7
Corrugated products		383,415		57,186		326,229			570.5
Export containerboard		210,097		257,821		(47,724	)		(18.5	)
Kraft paper		250,280		275,461		(25,181	)		(9.1	)
DuraSorb®		253,239		266,571		(13,332	)		(5.0	)
Kraftpak®		103,028		96,947		6,081			6.3

Tons of product sold		1,680,465		1,369,098		311,367			22.7	%

Tons of product sold in 2012 was 1,680,465 tons compared to 1,369,098 tons in 2011, an increase of 311,367 tons or 22.7 percent. The increase in tons of paper sold was primarily driven by the USC acquisition. Excluding the USC acquisition, tons of paper sold decreased by 14,862 tons or 1.1 percent.

•: Domestic containerboard sales increased 15.7 percent reflecting the impact of the USC acquisition and higher demand for lightweight containerboard grades.
•: Corrugated product sales volume increased 570.5 percent in 2012. Corrugated product sales, in billion square feet, was 6.2 billion in 2012 compared to 1.0 billion in 2011. Sales of corrugated products began with the USC acquisition which closed in the fourth quarter of 2011.
•: Export containerboard sales decreased 18.5 percent as more containerboard volume was shipped to domestic customers and used for internal consumption.
•: Kraft paper sales decreased 9.1 percent reflecting an overall decrease in demand in the industry and a transfer of volumes to lightweight containerboard grades.
•: Durasorb® sales declined 5.0 percent due to lower demand in copper clad laminate markets in Japan, Korea and Southeast Asia and in Europe due to lower demand for high pressure laminates.
•: Kraftpak® sales volume increased 6.3 percent due to higher volume with existing accounts.

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $866.1 million compared to $628.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $237.5 million, or 37.8 percent. The increase in cost of sales was mainly due to the $246.4 million impact of the USC acquisition. Excluding the USC acquisition, cost of sales decreased by $8.9 million due to $19.7 million of lower sales volume and $5.4 million of productivity gains, partially offset by $12.0 million of inflation on labor, benefits and input costs. Other costs increased approximately $2.9 million due to higher lumber and other sales and by $1.3 million due to repairs and maintenance costs at the Roanoke Rapids paper mill due to a flood which occurred on August 25 ^th . The mill received 11 inches of rain in less than six hours which resulted in a loss of 707 tons of production. Annual planned maintenance outages during 2012 and 2011 totaled $18.4 million and $18.8 million, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 totaled $63.1 million compared to $51.0 million for the same period in 2011. The increase of $12.1 million was primarily due to $11.4 million from the USC acquisition, $4.7 million of which is amortization of

Table of Contents

identified intangibles. Excluding the USC acquisition, depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.7 million.

Freight and distribution expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 totaled $108.4 million compared to $79.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase of $28.8 million was primarily due to $26.5 million from the USC acquisition. Excluding the USC acquisition, freight and distribution expenses increased $2.3 million primarily due to product mix reflecting a higher percentage of domestic containerboard shipments where the Company pays for freight and inflation on fuel costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 totaled $70.1 million compared to $41.3 million in 2011. The increase of $28.8 million was primarily due to $24.9 million from the USC acquisition. Excluding the USC acquisition, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.9 million due to the higher compensation related expenses and $1.5 million of higher acquisition integration related expenses. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 5.8 percent in 2012 from 4.6 percent in 2011.

Interest expense, net for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $11.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively. Interest expense reflects interest on borrowings under the Company's Credit Agreement and amortization of debt issuance costs. Interest expense was $5.7 million higher in 2012 due to a higher term loan balance to fund the USC acquisition and $1.0 million of higher debt amortization costs.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $35.0 million expense and $23.6 million benefit, respectively, reflecting an effective tax rate of 35.9 percent for 2012 compared to (23.6) percent for the similar period in 2011. The higher benefit for income taxes in 2011 mainly reflects $63.0 million for the reversal of tax reserves relating to alternative fuel mixture tax credits upon completion of the 2009 IRS examination in the fourth quarter of 2011.

The following table compares results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 :

	Year Ended December 31,

										% of Net Sales
							% Change			% of Net Sales
($ in thousands)	2011			2010			% Change			2011			2010
Net sales	$	906,119		$	782,676			15.8	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization		628,613			565,185			11.2	%		69.4			72.2
Depreciation and amortization		51,036			45,245			12.8	%		5.6			5.7
Freight and distribution expenses		79,643			73,406			8.5	%		8.7			9.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses		41,265			31,129			32.6	%		4.6			4.0
Other operating income		1,179			992			18.9	%		(0.1	)		(0.1	)

Operating income		106,741			68,703			55.4	%		11.8			8.8
Foreign exchange loss		319			666			(52.1	)%		—			(0.1	)
Interest expense, net		6,081			5,403			12.5	%		0.7			0.7

Income before income taxes		100,341			62,634			60.2	%		11.1			8.0
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(23,640	)		(2,407	)		882.1	%		(2.6	)		(0.3	)

Net income	$	123,981		$	65,041			90.6	%		13.7	%		8.3	%

Table of Contents

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $906.1 million compared to $782.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $123.4 million or 15.8 percent. Net sales in 2011 included two months (of USC sales after the closing of the USC acquisition on October 31, 2011) which accounted for $58.4 million of the increase in net sales. Excluding the acquisition, the increase in net sales was driven by $50.5 million of higher average selling prices in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to full realization of price increases implemented in 2010 and in the first half of 2011. Average selling price per ton for 2011 was $627 compared to $586 for 2010. Net sales also increased by $11.8 million due to higher unit sales and $1.0 million of more favorable product mix partially offset by $2.2 million of lower lumber sales. Exchange rates positively impacted net sales by $3.9 million.

The following represents the Company's tons of product sold:

	Year Ended December 31,

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase/ (Decrease)
Product Line (in tons):	2011		2010		Increase/ (Decrease)			%
Domestic containerboard		415,112		377,505		37,607			10.0
Corrugated products		57,186		—		57,186			NM
Export containerboard		257,821		272,719		(14,898	)		(5.5	)
Kraft Paper		275,461		273,216		2,245			0.8
DuraSorb®		266,571		268,852		(2,281	)		(0.8	)
Kraftpak®		96,947		92,853		4,094			4.4

Tons of product sold		1,369,098		1,285,145		83,953			6.5	%

Tons of product sold in 2011 was 1,369,098 tons compared to 1,285,145 tons in 2010, an increase of 83,953 tons or 6.5 percent. The increase in tons of paper sold was primarily driven by the USC acquisition. Excluding the USC acquisition, tons of paper sold increased by 26,767 tons or 2.1 percent.

•: Domestic containerboard sales volume increased 10.0 percent reflecting higher demand for lightweight grades.
•: Sales of corrugated products began with the USC acquisition which closed in the fourth quarter of 2011. Corrugated product sales, in million square feet, were 950 million in 2011.
•: Export containerboard volume decreased 5.5 percent due to higher domestic shipments.
•: DuraSorb® sales volume declined 0.8 percent due to a reduction in export shipments, mainly in Asia.
•: Kraftpak® sales volume increased 4.4 percent reflecting higher penetration in folding carton markets.

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $628.6 million compared to $565.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $63.4 million or 11.2 percent. Excluding $44.8 million of cost of sales for the sales of the acquired USC business, the increase in cost of sales was mainly due to a $22.2 million decrease in alternative fuel mixture tax credits (the tax credit expired December 31, 2009), $5.8 million due to inflation of input costs and $5.3 million of higher sales volume. Partially offsetting the increase in cost of sales was $11.9 million from productivity gains and other cost savings and $2.8 million of lower planned maintenance outage costs.

Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2011 totaled $51.0 million compared to $45.2 million for the same period in 2010. Excluding $2.2 million for the acquisition, the increase of $3.6 million was primarily due to $38.3 million of capital spending in 2010 and $0.8 million of accelerated depreciation in 2011.

Table of Contents

Freight and distribution expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 totaled $79.6 million compared to $73.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $6.2 million. Excluding $4.2 million for the addition of two months of USC's results, the increase was primarily due to $1.5 million of inflation on fuel costs and $1.1 million of higher sales volume partially offset by $0.6 million of lower warehousing costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 totaled $41.3 million compared to $31.1 million in 2010. Excluding $4.5 million for the addition of two months of USC's results, the increase of $5.7 million reflects $3.3 million of acquisition related expenses, $1.0 million of higher incentive compensation and $1.4 million of other cost increases. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 4.0 percent in 2010 to 4.6 percent in 2011.

Foreign exchange losses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The change reflects fluctuations in the U.S. dollar to Euro exchange rate.

Interest expense, net for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $6.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Interest expense reflects interest on the Credit Agreement and amortization of debt issuance costs. Interest expense was $0.7 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 due to higher term loan balances in the fourth quarter of 2011 as a result of entering into a new credit agreement in conjunction with the USC acquisition on October 31, 2011.

The benefit for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $23.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively, reflecting an effective tax rate of (23.6) percent in 2011 compared to (3.8) percent in 2010. The higher benefit for income taxes in 2011 mainly reflects $63.0 million for the reversal of tax reserves relating to alternative fuel mixture tax credits upon completion of the 2009 IRS examination in the fourth quarter of 2011. The 2010 benefit for income taxes included a $21.0 million benefit related to the Cellulosic Biofuel credit and a refundable tax credit from the inorganic content of black liquor.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Amendment to Credit Agreement

On May 10, 2012, the Company entered into a First Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the "First Amendment"), which amended the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2011. The First Amendment, among other things, expanded the "accordion" feature under the Credit Agreement, removed certain mandatory prepayment events, and modified the calculation methodology of the financial covenants. The "accordion" feature in the Credit Agreement now permits the Company, subject to certain terms and conditions, to request an increase in the revolving commitments and/or additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $450.0 million.

On November 28, 2012, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement ("Second Amendment"), further amending the Company's Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment amended the definition of "Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio", changed the applicable rate grid, extended the Maturity Date from October 31, 2016 to November 28, 2017, and permitted a one-time special cash dividend to be paid by the Company on or before December 31, 2012, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $100.0 million.

Voluntary and Mandatory Prepayments

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company made $50.0 million and $15.0 million of voluntary principal prepayments, respectively to the term loan under the Credit Agreement. No mandatory prepayments were required under the Credit Agreement.

Table of Contents

Other Borrowing

In 2012 and 2011, the Company entered into financing agreements of $3.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, at an annual interest rate of 2.00 percent and 1.75 percent, respectively, for its annual property insurance premium. The agreements required the Company to make consecutive monthly repayments through the term of the financing agreement ending on December 1 of each year. As of December 31, 2012, there was no balance outstanding under the current agreement. The Company entered into a similar agreement in 2013 with similar terms and conditions.

Debt Covenants

Under the financial covenants of the Credit Agreement, KapStone must comply on a quarterly basis with a maximum permitted leverage ratio. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing KapStone's debt by its rolling twelve month total earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and allowable adjustments. The maximum permitted leverage ratio declines over the life of the Credit Agreement. On December 31, 2012, the maximum permitted leverage ratio was 3.25 to 1.00. On December 31, 2012, KapStone was in compliance with the Credit Agreement with a leverage ratio of 2.06 to 1.00.

The Credit Agreement also includes a financial covenant requiring a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing KapStone's twelve month total earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and allowable adjustments less cash payments for income taxes and capital expenditures by the sum of our cash interest and required principal payments during the twelve month period. From the closing date of the Credit Agreement through the quarter ending December 31, 2012 the fixed charge coverage ratio was required to be at least 1.25 to 1.00. On December 31, 2012, KapStone was in compliance with the Credit Agreement with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 12.93 to 1.00.

As of December 31, 2012, KapStone was also in compliance with all other applicable covenants in the Credit Agreement.

Income Taxes

Income taxes paid, net of refunds, were $7.0 million, $0.3 million, and ($13.2) million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company expects to pay a higher amount of income taxes in 2013.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Years ended December 31 ($ in thousands)	2012			2011			2010

Operating activities	$	157,829		$	136,376		$	136,076
Investing activities		(67,551	)		(423,863	)		(35,180	)
Financing activities		(81,852	)		228,191			(35,978	)

Total change in cash and cash equivalents	$	8,426		$	(59,296	)	$	64,918

2012

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $8.4 million from December 31, 2011, reflecting $157.8 million of net cash provided by operating activities offset by $67.5 million of net cash used in investing activities and $81.9 million of net cash used in financing activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $157.8 million, primarily due to $62.5 million of net income, $88.1 million of non-cash charges and $7.2 million due to changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $21.5 million during the year ended

Table of Contents

December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to operating assets and liabilities using $93.6 million of less cash offset by $61.4 million of lower net income in 2012 than 2011 and $10.7 million of lower non-cash charges.

Net cash used in investing activities was $67.6 million reflecting $67.2 million of capital expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2012, capital expenditures for legacy operations were $50.5 million related to spending on equipment upgrades and replacements at the paper mills and were $16.7 million for our mill and corrugated operations acquired in the USC acquisition, primarily related to investments in information technology. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $356.3 million in 2012 compared to 2011, mainly due to the $331.3 million paid for the USC acquisition and a $49.7 million contingent earn-out payment in 2011 for the KPB acquisition, partially offset by $24.7 million of higher capital expenditures in 2012.

Net cash used in financing activities was $81.9 million reflecting the $94.9 million special cash dividend payment in December 2012 and $50.0 million voluntary prepayment on the term loan in June 2012, partially offset by $63.5 million of short-term borrowings under the revolving credit. Net cash used in financing activities increased by $310.0 million for 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to $375.0 million of 2011 loan proceeds and $94.9 million for the 2012 special cash dividend payment. These amounts were partially offset by $63.5 million in 2012 short-term borrowings, lower debt repayment in 2012 of $84.6 million, and $13.8 million for the 2011 debt issuance costs.

2011

Cash and cash equivalents of $8.1 million at December 31, 2011 decreased by $59.3 million from December 31, 2010, reflecting cash provided by operations of $136.4 million and cash provided by financing activities of $228.2 million, offset by cash used in investing activities of $423.9 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $136.4 million due to $124.0 million of net income and $98.8 million of non-cash charges. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $86.5 million of cash. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $0.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 due to a $58.9 million increase in net income and $71.5 million of higher non-cash charges partially offset by a $130.2 million increase in cash used in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash charges increased by $71.5 million, primarily due to $65.8 million of higher deferred income taxes. The $130.2 million increase of cash used in operating assets and liabilities was mainly due to a reversal of a $63.0 million tax reserve for the AFMTC, $13.2 million tax refund received in June 2010, $13.1 million of AFMTC payments received in the first six months of 2010 and $9.7 million of incentive compensation paid in 2011.

Net cash used in investing activities included $331.6 million for the USC acquisition, $49.7 million reflecting a contingent earn-out payment made to IP in connection with the KPB acquisition and $42.5 million of capital expenditures. Capital expenditures were mainly spent on equipment upgrades and replacements at the paper mills. Net cash used in investing activities increased by $388.7 million during the year ended December, 31 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 mainly due to the $331.6 million paid for the USC acquisition and the $49.7 million contingent earn-out payment.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $228.2 million reflecting $375.0 million of loan proceeds from the Credit Agreement entered into in October 2011, partially offset by the $114.9 million payoff of the Company's prior credit facility, $19.7 million of term loan repayments including a $15.0 million voluntary payment, and $13.8 million of debt issuance costs for the Credit Agreement. Net cash provided by financing activities changed by $264.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 mainly due to the loan proceeds received under the Credit Agreement, partially offset by the payoff of the Company's prior credit facility and payment of debt issuance costs.

Table of Contents

Future Cash Needs

We expect that cash on hand at December 31, 2012 and cash generated from operating activities in 2013 and, if needed, the ability to draw from our $150.0 million revolving credit facility under our Credit Agreement and our $450.0 million accordion provision under our Credit Agreement will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash needs, which primarily consist of $69.9 million repaying our short-term borrowings and interest on our term loans, approximately $73.0 million of expected capital expenditures, $4.4 million of pension plan funding and any additional working capital or acquisition needs. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $63.5 million in borrowings and $79.6 million of remaining availability under the revolving credit facility.

On a long term basis, we expect that cash generated from operating activities and, if needed, the ability to draw from our revolving credit facility and accordion provision will be sufficient to meet long term obligations, which primarily consist of $393.1 million of debt service and interest, which includes a $131.3 million final payment on our term loan in November 2017, capital expenditures of $45.0 to $60.0 million annually, annual defined benefit pension plan contributions, working capital needs and acquisitions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements and have not established any special purpose entities. We have not guaranteed any debt or commitments of other non-related entities or entered into any options on non-financial assets.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe our critical accounting policies are those described below. The Company's audit committee has reviewed the policies listed below. For a detailed discussion of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition —The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605, Revenue Recognition . Revenue is recognized when the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. Sales with terms designated f.o.b. (free on board) shipping point are recognized at the time of shipment. For sales transactions with terms f.o.b. destination, revenue is recorded when the product is delivered to the customer's site and when title and risk of loss are transferred. Sales on consignment are recognized in revenue at the earlier of the month that the goods are consumed or after a period of time subsequent to receipt by the customer as specified by contract terms. Incentive rebates are typically paid in cash and are netted against revenue on an accrual basis as qualifying purchases are made by the customer to earn and thereby retain the rebate.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of shaft horsepower, generated by its cogeneration facility, on a gross basis and is included in net sales.

Freight charged to customers is recognized in net sales.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets —Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. On an annual basis and in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other , the Company tests for goodwill impairment using a two-step process, unless there is a triggering event, in which case a test would be performed at the time that such triggering event occurs. The first step is to identify a potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its

Table of Contents

carrying amount. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a "component"). A component is considered a reporting unit for purposes of goodwill testing if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. For 2012, the Company has identified two reporting units. The estimates of fair value of a reporting unit are determined based on a market approach as well as an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires the Company to make various judgmental assumptions, including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the forecast and long-term business plans of the Company's operating segment. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting units. If necessary, the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits —The Company provides pension and postretirement benefits to certain employees and accounts for these benefits in accordance with ASC 715, Compensation—Retirement Benefits . For financial reporting purposes, long-term assumptions are developed through consultations with actuaries. Such assumptions include the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, discount rates, health care trend rates and mortality rates. The discount rate for the current year is based on long-term high quality bond rates.

Income Taxes —The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes . Accordingly, deferred income taxes are provided for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company recognizes the benefit of tax positions when it is more likely than not to be sustained on its technical merits. The Company records interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes.

Stock Based Compensation Costs —The Company accounts for stock compensation expense in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation . The compensation expense for stock options is recorded on an accelerated basis over the awards' vesting periods. The compensation expense for restricted stock is recorded on a straight-line basis over the awards' vesting periods. Forfeitures are estimated on the date of grant and revised if actual or expected forfeiture activity differs materially from the original estimate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012, ($000s):

	Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		Thereafter
Short-term borrowings(1)	$	63,500	$	63,500	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Long-term debt(2)		305,313		—		26,406		49,219		56,250		173,438		—
Interest on long-term debt(3)		24,316		6,389		5,836		5,147		4,236		2,708		—
Operating lease obligations(4)		106,316		10,616		9,745		8,665		8,337		6,942		62,011
Purchase obligations(5)		247,009		39,054		30,018		29,268		27,433		24,308		96,928
Minimum pension plan funding(6)		4,410		4,410		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	750,864	$	123,969	$	72,005	$	92,299	$	96,256	$	207,396	$	158,939

(1): These obligations do not become due until November 28, 2017 but it is management's intention to use cash flow from operations to settle this obligation in 2013.
(2): These obligations are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012, in long-term debt net of current portion, as appropriate. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3): Assumes debt is carried to full term. Debt bears interest at variable rates and the amounts above assume future interest will be incurred at the rates in effect on December 31, 2012. These obligations are not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012.
(4): These obligations are not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012.
(5): Purchase obligations are agreements to purchase goods that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased. These obligations are not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012. See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements regarding the Company's purchase obligation relating to the Long Term Fiber Supply with MWV.
(6): The Company's pension and postretirement liabilities total $13.2 million as of December 31, 2012. The minimum pension plan funding represents the Company's expected 2013 contributions and was determined in consultation with our actuary in accordance with IRS guidelines. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Due to the uncertainty of the timing of settlement with taxing authorities, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement of unrecognized tax benefits. Therefore, $5.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012 has been excluded from the table above.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the sensitivity of income to changes in interest rates, commodity prices and foreign currency changes. The Company is exposed to the following types of market risk: interest rates, commodity prices and foreign currency.

Interest Rates

Under our Credit Agreement, at December 31, 2012, we have an outstanding credit facility consisting of a term loan and revolving credit facility totaling $455.3 million. The initial term loan and the revolving credit facility have a maturity date of November 28, 2017. Depending on the type of

Table of Contents

borrowing, the applicable interest rate under the Credit Agreement is calculated at a per annum rate equal to (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which is currently 1.50% for Eurodollar loans, or (b) (i) the greatest of (x) the prime rate, (y) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% or (z) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% plus (ii) an applicable margin, which is currently 0.50% for base rate loans. The unused portion of the revolving credit facility is subject to an unused fee that is calculated at a per annum rate (the "Unused Fee Rate"), which is currently 0.35%. With the delivery of the financial statements for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, the applicable margin for borrowings under the Credit Agreement and the Unused Fee Rate is determined by reference to a pricing grid based on the Company's total leverage ratio. Under such pricing grid, the applicable margins for the Credit Agreement ranges from 1.25% to 2.25% for Eurodollar loans and from 0.25% to 1.250% for base rate loans, and the Unused Fee Rate ranges from 0.30% to 0.50%.

Changes in market rates may impact the base or LIBOR rate in our Credit Agreement. For instance, if the bank's LIBOR rate was to increase or decrease by one percentage point (1.0%), our annual interest expense would change by approximately $3.1 million based upon our expected future monthly term loan balances per our existing repayment schedule.

Commodity Prices

We are exposed to price fluctuations of certain commodities used in production. Key materials and energy used in the production process include roundwood and woodchips, recycled fiber (OCC), containerboard, fuel oil, natural gas, electricity and caustic soda. We generally purchase these materials and energy at market prices, and do not use forward contracts or other financial instruments to hedge our exposure to price risk related to these commodities. We have three contracts to purchase coal at fixed prices through December 31, 2013.

We are exposed to price fluctuations in the price of our finished goods. The prices we charge for our products are primarily based on market conditions.

Foreign Currency

We are exposed to currency fluctuations as we invoice certain European customers in Euros. The Company used foreign currency forward contracts and foreign exchange forward contracts to manage some of the foreign currency exchange risks associated with foreign sales of its U.S. operations during 2010. Using such foreign currency forward contracts, the Company received or paid the difference between the contracted forward rate and the exchange rate at the settlement date. These contracts were used to hedge the variability of exchange rates on the Company's cash flows. No such contracts were outstanding at December 31, 2012 or 2011.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial statements are attached hereto beginning on Page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012 was made by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Table of Contents

Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management's report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page F-2 of this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Effective October 1, 2012 the Company migrated the paper mill and fourteen corrugating manufacturing plants acquired as part of the USC acquisition to a new ERP system. There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed on or about April 1, 2013 with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

Additional information required by this Item (i) with respect to members of our Board of Directors will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about April 1, 2013 under the caption "Election of Directors," (ii) with respect to our audit committee will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement under the caption "Governance Structure—What Committees has the Board of Directors Established?," (iii) with respect to compliance under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be contained in Company's Proxy Statement under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," and (iv) with respect to our code of ethics will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement under the caption "Code of Ethics," and is incorporated herein by this reference.

KapStone adopted a code of ethics that applies to its CEO and CFO, as well as all other officers and employees of the Company and its affiliates. This code of ethics, entitled "Code of Conduct and Ethics"," is posted on the Company's website at www.kapstonepaper.com under "Governance." The Code of Conduct and Ethics is administered by the Chief Compliance Officer of the Company. Any amendment to, or waiver of, a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the CEO, CFO, or persons performing similar functions will be disclosed on the Company's website a under "Governance."

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about April 1, 2013 under the captions "Executive Compensation," "Summary Compensation Table," "Grants of Plan-Based Awards," "Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year End," "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control," and "2012 Director Compensation" and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about April 1, 2013 under the captions "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan", "Security Ownership of Management" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Stockholders" and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Table of Contents

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions and Director Independence

The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about April 1, 2013 under the captions "Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions," and "Governance Structure" is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item will be contained in the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about April 1, 2013 under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and is incorporated herein by this reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a): (1) Financial Statements

An index to Consolidated Financial Statements appears on page F-1.

(a): (2) Financial Statement Schedules

Certain financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

(b): Exhibits.

The following Exhibits are filed as part of this report:

		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 22, 2011, by and among KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation, U.S. Corrugated Acquisition Inc., Pine Merger Corp., Dennis Dorian Mehiel, for purposes of Section 10.3, and Dennis Mehiel, for purposes of Section 10.3 and as the Representative. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2011.

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (as amended through January 2, 2007). Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 10, 2010.

3.2		Amended and Restated By-laws. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009.

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-124601) filed on June 14, 2005.

10.1		Form of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc. and each of the Initial Stockholders. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-124601) filed on June 14, 2005.

10.2	*	2006 Incentive Plan amended and restated as of May 18, 2012.

10.3	*	Performance Incentive Plan of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2008.

10.4	*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2008.

Table of Contents

		Description

10.5	*	2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form S-8 filed on December 11, 2009.

10.6	*	Restricted Stock Unit Agreement Amendment November 28, 2012 issued on or about May 27, 2012 between KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and Grantee.

10.7		Long-Term Fiber Supply Agreement, dated July 1, 2008, by and among MeadWestvaco Forestry LLC and KapStone Charleston Kraft LLC (with certain confidential information deleted there from). Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2008.

10.8		Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2011, by and among KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation, as Borrower, the subsidiaries of Borrower named therein, as Guarantors, the lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Barclays Bank PLC, as Syndication Agent, and Fifth Third Bank and TD Bank, as co-Documentation Agents. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2011.

10.9		First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2012 by and among Kapstone Kraft Paper Corporation, as Borrower, the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company as Guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America N.A., as Administrative Agent, which amends the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2011, by and among the Borrower, the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company as Guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2012.

10.10		Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated November 28, 2012, by and among KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation, as Borrower, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantors, the lenders who are a party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, amending the Company's Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2011, as previously amended. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2012.

14.0		Code of Ethics.

21.1		Subsidiaries.

23.1		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

32.l		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.			Description

	101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

	101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

	101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

	101.PRE		XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase.

*: Management compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant had duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ ROGER W. STONE Roger W. Stone, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ ROGER W. STONE Roger W. Stone, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ ANDREA K. TARBOX Andrea K. Tarbox, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ MATTHEW KAPLAN Matthew Kaplan, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ JOHN M. CHAPMAN John M. Chapman, Director
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ JONATHAN R. FURER Jonathan R. Furer, Director
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ BRIAN R. GAMACHE Brian R. Gamache, Director

Table of Contents


March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ RONALD J. GIDWITZ Ronald J. Gidwitz, Director
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ MATTHEW H. PAULL Matthew H. Paull, Director
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ S. JAY STEWART S. Jay Stewart, Director
March 4, 2013	By:	/s/ DAVID P. STORCH David P. Storch, Director

Table of Contents

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

(INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)

Financial Statements		Page

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting			F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting			F-3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2012, 2011, and 2010			F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011			F-5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010			F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010			F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010			F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F-9

F-1

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT'S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 3a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. Management based this assessment on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal Control—Integrated Framework."

Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the Company's internal control over financial reporting and has included their reports herein.

F-2

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

We have audited KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balance sheets of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, and our report dated March 4, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 4, 2013

F-3

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation's internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria establish in Internal Control—Integrated Framework , issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 4, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 4, 2013

F-4

Table of Contents

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	December 31,

	2012			2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,488		$	8,062
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $96 in 2012 and $571 in 2011		111,592			108,320
Other receivables		10,061			11,247
Inventories		113,511			110,054
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,808			4,207
Deferred income taxes		5,864			10,048

Total current assets		267,324			251,938

Plant, property and equipment, net		576,115			567,195
Other assets		4,412			4,313
Intangible assets, net		57,027			63,715
Goodwill		226,289			237,193

Total assets	$	1,131,167		$	1,124,354

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	—		$	6,094
Short-term borrowings		63,500			—
Accounts payable		89,638			81,051
Accrued expenses		25,032			21,217
Accrued compensation costs		20,421			27,445

Total current liabilities		198,591			135,807

Other liabilities:
Long-term debt, net of current portion		294,310			335,635
Pension and postretirement benefits		13,193			10,676
Deferred income taxes		96,459			84,316
Other liabilities		10,666			11,642

Total other liabilities		414,628			442,269

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 175,000,000 shares authorized; 47,455,060 shares issued and outstanding (40,000 treasury shares outstanding) at December 31, 2012 and 46,449,695 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 (40,000 treasury shares outstanding)		5			5
Additional paid-in capital		236,034			230,665
Retained earnings		285,011			318,068
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,102	)		(2,460	)

Total stockholders' equity		517,948			546,278

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,131,167		$	1,124,354

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Years Ended December 31,

	2012			2011			2010
Net sales	$	1,216,637		$	906,119		$	782,676
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization		866,124			628,613			565,185
Depreciation and amortization		63,124			51,036			45,245
Freight and distribution expenses		108,438			79,643			73,406
Selling, general and administrative expenses		70,055			41,265			31,129
Other operating income		664			1,179			992

Operating income		109,560			106,741			68,703

Foreign exchange loss		303			319			666
Interest expense, net		11,774			6,081			5,403

Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes		97,483			100,341			62,634
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		34,978			(23,640	)		(2,407	)

Net income	$	62,505		$	123,981		$	65,041

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Pension and post-retirement plan liability adjustments:
Net actuarial loss		(909	)		(2,435	)		(434	)
Amortization of prior service credit		105			235			541
Amortization of net gain (loss)		162			42			(320	)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		(642	)		(2,158	)		(213	)

Total comprehensive income	$	61,863		$	121,823		$	64,828

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		46,713,456			46,287,183			45,854,237
Diluted		47,726,439			47,487,623			46,979,060
Net income per share:
Basic	$	1.34		$	2.68		$	1.42

Diluted	$	1.31		$	2.61		$	1.38

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

(In thousands, except share amounts)

	Common Stock, net of Treasury Stock

											Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
					Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings						Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings						Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance—December 31, 2009		45,418,074	$	5	$	219,828		$	129,046		$	(89	)	$	348,790

Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		3,592			—			—			3,592
Payment of withholding taxes on vested restricted stock awards		122,433		—		(624	)		—			—			(624	)
Exercise of purchase option		348,393		—		—			—			—			—
Exercise of stock options		186,171		—		1,282			—			—			1,282
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—		—		585			—			—			585
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		6,641		—		70			—			—			70
Other		—		—		111			—			—			111
Net income		—		—		—			65,041			—			65,041
Pension and postretirement plan liability adjustments, net of tax of $111		—		—		—			—			(213	)		(213	)

Balance—December 31, 2010		46,081,712	$	5	$	224,844		$	194,087		$	(302	)	$	418,634

Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		3,985			—			—			3,985
Payment of withholding taxes on vested restricted stock awards		133,365		—		(952	)		—			—			(952	)
Exercise of stock options		221,973		—		1,264			—			—			1,264
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—		—		1,332			—			—			1,332
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		12,645		—		192			—			—			192
Net income		—		—		—			123,981			—			123,981
Pension and postretirement plan liability adjustments, net of tax of $1,183		—		—		—			—			(2,158	)		(2,158	)

Balance—December 31, 2011		46,449,695	$	5	$	230,665		$	318,068		$	(2,460	)	$	546,278

Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		5,242			—			—			5,242
Payment of withholding taxes on vested stock awards and options exercised		202,084		—		(9,496	)		—			—			(9,496	)
Exercise of stock options		787,227		—		1,345			—			—			1,345
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—		—		8,037			—			—			8,037
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		16,054		—		241			—			—			241
Special Cash Dividend		—		—		—			(95,562	)		—			(95,562	)
Net income		—		—		—			62,505			—			62,505
Pension and postretirement plan liability adjustments, net of tax of $386		—		—		—			—			(642	)		(642	)

Balance—December 31, 2012		47,455,060	$	5	$	236,034		$	285,011		$	(3,102	)	$	517,948

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Table of Contents

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,

	2012			2011			2010
Operating activities
Net income	$	62,505		$	123,981		$	65,041
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		63,124			51,036			45,245
Stock-based compensation expense		5,242			3,985			3,592
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense		(8,037	)		(1,332	)		(585	)
Amortization of debt issuance costs		3,479			2,482			2,237
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		1,202			910			876
Deferred income taxes		23,128			41,766			(24,062	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net		(2,896	)		(3,679	)		(8,232	)
Other receivables		1,186			(2,722	)		13,707
Inventories		(1,248	)		(3,528	)		(11,947	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(5,601	)		(239	)		12,696
Other assets		(452	)		(639	)		(624	)
Accounts payable		9,163			(8,979	)		3,357
Accrued expenses		3,743			(5,651	)		2,186
Accrued compensation costs		(6,127	)		3,424			10,510
Other liabilities		9,418			(64,439	)		22,079

Net cash provided by operating activities		157,829			136,376			136,076

Investing activities
USC acquisition (net of cash acquired)		(314	)		(331,632	)		—
CKD acquisition		—			—			638
KPB acquisition earn-out payment		—			(49,700	)		—
Capital expenditures		(67,237	)		(42,531	)		(38,318	)
Restricted cash		—			—			2,500

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(67,551	)		(423,863	)		(35,180	)

Financing activities
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		142,900			7,600			76,700
Repayments on revolving credit facility		(79,400	)		(7,600	)		(84,100	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		—			375,000			—
Repayments on long-term debt		(50,000	)		(134,582	)		(30,002	)
Special cash dividend		(94,910	)		—			—
Debt issuance costs paid		—			(13,819	)		—
Proceeds from other current borrowings		3,398			2,273			2,564
Repayments on other current borrowings		(3,398	)		(2,273	)		(2,564	)
Payment of withholding taxes on vested stock awards and options exercised		(9,496	)		(952	)		(624	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,345			1,264			1,282
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		8,037			1,332			585
Proceeds from issuance of shares to ESPP		241			192			70
Loan amendment costs and other		(569	)		(244	)		111

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(81,852	)		228,191			(35,978	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		8,426			(59,296	)		64,918
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of year		8,062			67,358			2,440

Cash and cash equivalents—end of year	$	16,488		$	8,062		$	67,358

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-8

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Formation, Basis of Presentation and Description of Business

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, or the "Company," produces and sells a variety of unbleached kraft paper and corrugated products in the United States and globally. The Company was incorporated on April 15, 2005 in Delaware.

On October 31, 2011, the Company consummated the acquisition of U.S. Corrugated Acquisition Inc. ("USC") from its stockholders by merger. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of USC since the date of acquisition (see Note 3). As a result of the USC acquisition, the accompanying 2012 consolidated financial statements are not comparative to 2011 and 2010.

Principles of Consolidation —The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Use of Estimates —The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future; actual results may be different from the estimates.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition —Revenue is recognized when the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership, when the price is fixed and determinable and when collectability is reasonably assured. Sales with terms f.o.b. (free on board) shipping point are recognized at the time of shipment. For sales transactions with terms f.o.b. destination, revenue is recorded when the product is delivered to the customer's site and when title and risk of loss are transferred. Sales on consignment are recognized in revenue at the earlier of the month that the goods are consumed or after a period of time subsequent to receipt by the customer as specified by contract terms, provided all other revenue recognition criteria is met. Incentive rebates are typically paid in cash and are netted against revenue on an accrual basis as qualifying purchases are made by the customer to earn and thereby retain the rebate.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of shaft horsepower, generated by our cogeneration facility, on a gross basis presented in net sales.

Freight charged to customers is recognized in net sales.

Cost of Sales —Cost of sales is determined on a first-in first-out basis and includes material, labor and overhead costs but excludes depreciation and amortization. Proceeds received from the sale of by-products generated from the paper and packaging manufacturing process are reflected as a reduction to cost of sales. Income from sales of by-products is derived primarily from the sale of tall oil, hardwood, turpentine and waste bales to third parties. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, cost of sales was reduced by $23.0 million, $16.0 million and $15.5 million, respectively for these by-product sales.

F-9

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Freight and distribution expenses —Freight and distribution include shipping and handling costs for product sold to customers and is excluded from cost of sales.

Planned Maintenance Outage Costs —The Company recognizes the cost of maintenance activities in the period in which they occur under the direct expense method in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment . The Company performs annual planned maintenance outages at its Roanoke Rapids and Cowpens mills. The Charleston mill has a tri-annual planned maintenance outage which occurred during the year ended December 31, 2010. Costs of approximately $18.4 million, $18.8 million and $21.6 million related to planned maintenance outages are included in cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Net Income per Common Share —Basic net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share reflects the potential dilution assuming common shares were issued for the exercise of outstanding in-the-money warrants and stock options and unvested restricted stock awards and assuming the proceeds thereof were used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period such awards were outstanding and inclusion of such shares is dilutive to net income per share.

Concentrations of Risk —Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit and market risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable from sales of product to third parties. When excess cash and cash equivalents are invested they are placed in investment grade commercial paper.

No customer accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated net sales in 2012, 2011 and 2010. In order to mitigate credit risk, the Company obtains letters of credit for certain export customers. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, net sales to US based customers were 77%, 65% and 62%, respectively, of consolidated net sales. Net sales to foreign based customers during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were 23%, 35% and 38%, respectively, of consolidated net sales. No foreign country accounted for more than 10% of consolidated net sales during 2012, 2011 or 2010.

The Company establishes its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors mainly surrounding the credit risks of specific customers and other related information. Once an account is deemed uncollectible, it is written off. At December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts are summarized as follows ($000's):

Year ended:	Balance at beginning of year		Charged to Expense		Deductions			Balance at at end of year

December 31, 2012	$	571	$	97	$	(572	)	$	96
December 31, 2011	$	1,205	$	29	$	(663	)	$	571
December 31, 2010	$	1,217	$	124	$	(136	)	$	1,205

•: Deductions in 2012 include $0.4 million of USC purchase price adjustment and $0.2 million of accounts written-off.
•: Deductions in 2011 include $1.2 million of accounts written-off and $0.6 million allowance associated with the USC acquisition.

F-10

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

•: Deductions in 2010 include recoveries of amounts previously written off.

Foreign Currency Transactions —The Company invoices certain European customers in Euros. Balance sheet accounts for such transactions are translated into U.S. dollars at the year-end rate of exchange and statements of comprehensive income items are translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the period. Gains and losses arising from these transactions are included in foreign exchange gains / (losses) within the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Cash and Cash Equivalents —Cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Fair value of Financial Instruments —The Company's cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivables and accounts payables are financial assets and liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value. The Company's variable rate term loan and short-term borrowings are financial liabilities with fair values that approximate their carrying value of $368.8 million (see Note 9).

Inventories —Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market; whereby, cost includes all direct and indirect materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead, less by-product recoveries. Costs of raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods are determined using the first-in, first-out method. Replacement parts and other supplies are stated using the average cost method. Purchases and sales of inventory with the same counterparty that are entered into in contemplation of one another are combined and recorded as exchanges of inventory measured at the book value of the item exchanged.

Plant, Property, and Equipment, net —Plant, property, and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property, plant, and equipment acquired in acquisitions were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful lives. The range of estimated useful lives is as follows:

		Years

Land Improvements			3 - 25
Buildings			11 - 40
Machinery and equipment			3 - 30
Furniture and office equipment			5 - 10
Computer hardware and software			3 - 5

The Company accounts for costs incurred for the development of software for internal use in accordance with the ASC 350 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other . This standard requires the capitalization of certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal use software.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets —Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. On an annual basis and in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other , the Company tests for goodwill impairment using a two-step process, unless there is a triggering event, in which case a test would be performed at the time that such triggering event occurs. An amendment to ASC 350 became effective December 2011 that allows a qualitative assessment, prior to step one, to determine whether is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. The Company did not attempt a qualitative assessment and

F-11

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

moved directly to step one. The first step is to identify a potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a "component"). A component is considered a reporting unit for purposes of goodwill testing if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. For 2012, the Company has identified two reporting units. The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units principally based on a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires the Company to make various judgmental assumptions, including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the forecast and long-term business plans of each reporting unit. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting units. These assumptions are considered Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Discounts . Management also considers market-multiple information to corroborate the fair value conclusions reached using the discounted cash flow analysis. If necessary, the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. The Company's goodwill impairment analysis is performed annually at the beginning of the fourth quarter and did not result in an impairment charge.

Intangible assets acquired in a business combination or asset purchase are initially valued at the fair market value using generally accepted valuation methods appropriate for the type of the intangible asset. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if indicators of impairment arise. The evaluation of the impairment is based upon a comparison of the carrying amount of the intangible asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the assets, the asset is considered to be impaired. If impaired, the intangible asset is written down to estimated fair market value.

F-12

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs —The Company capitalizes costs incurred in connection with borrowings or establishment of credit facilities. These costs are amortized over the life of the borrowing or life of the credit facility using the effective interest method. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, $3.5 million, $2.5 million, $2.2 million, respectively, of debt issuance costs have been amortized and recognized within interest expense, net.

Stock Based Compensation Expense —The Company accounts for employee stock and stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. Accordingly, compensation expense for the fair value of stock options, as determined on the date of grant, is recorded on an accelerated basis over the awards' vesting periods. The compensation expense for the fair value of restricted stock units, as determined on the date of grant, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the awards' vesting periods. Forfeitures are estimated on the date of grant and revised if actual or expected forfeiture activity differs materially from the original estimate.

Segment Information —The Company has one reportable segment, unbleached kraft paper and corrugated products. The Company produces unbleached kraft paper and corrugated products which are sold to customers who convert our products into end-market finished products or internally to corrugating plants who produce a wide variety of products ranging from basic corrugated shipping containers to specialized packaging.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") No. 2011-11, " Balance Sheet (Topic 210), Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, " which requires entities to disclose information about financial instruments that have been offset and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods and will be applied retrospectively. The Company does not expect the implementation of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-09, " Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80) ", which require an employer to provide additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures for multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. The amended disclosures provide users with more detailed information about an employer's involvement in multiemployer plans. The guidance became effective for the Company in its December 31, 2011 year-end reporting and resulted in additional disclosures related to the Company's participation in multiemployer pension plans, which are not material to its consolidated financial statements (see Note 10).

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-08, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other." This guidance provides an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying

F-13

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, as described in paragraph 350-20-35-4. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance in conjunction with its annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2012 and it did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income," which revises the manner in which entities should present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The new guidance requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance in using the continuous statement approach in 2012 on a retrospective basis for all periods presented.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS." This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop converged guidance on how to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP; however, it expands existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments, many of which eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

3. USC Acquisition

On October 31, 2011, the Company consummated the acquisition of USC from its stockholders by merger for $330.0 million in cash plus $1.6 million of working capital adjustments. USC was a privately-held corporation which, through its subsidiaries, operated a recycled containerboard paper mill in Cowpens, South Carolina and 20 converting facilities across the eastern and Midwestern United States. Six of such converting facilities (and certain related assets) were disposed of by USC prior to closing and were not acquired by the Company. The assets acquired consisted of a recycled containerboard paper mill in Cowpens, South Carolina and fourteen box and corrugated sheet plants across the eastern and Midwestern United States, trade accounts receivable, inventories and certain long-term assets. The liabilities assumed consisted of trade accounts payable, accrued expenses and certain long-term liabilities.

On March 9, 2012, the Company reached an agreement with USC on the final calculation of merger consideration and paid an additional $0.3 million for the final working capital adjustment which was allocated to acquisition consideration.

F-14

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. USC Acquisition (Continued)

The following table summarizes the acquisition consideration:


Purchase price, net of cash acquired	$	330,000
Working capital adjustments		1,946

Total acquisition consideration	$	331,946

In 2011 acquisition related costs for due diligence, advisory, legal services, and other items were $2.7 million. Following the acquisition in 2012, integration related costs were $3.8 million. All costs were expensed as incurred and were recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The USC acquisition was accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations and the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of USC since October 31, 2011. The Company estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of USC at the time of acquisition and used third-party appraisals to determine the fair market value for tangible and intangible assets. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate estimated fair value of net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. The purchase price allocation is final.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class of assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date, as well as adjustments made during 2012 (referred to as "measurement period adjustments"):

	Amounts Recognized at Acquisition Date(1)			Measurement Period Adjustments(2)			Amounts Recognized as of Acquisition Date (as Adjusted)(3)

Trade accounts receivable	$	38,001		$	376		$	38,377
Other receivables		5,745			—			5,745
Inventories		33,202			2,209			35,411
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		754			—			754
Plant, property and equipment		106,532			(500	)		106,032
Other assets		634			—			634
Intangible assets		45,400			1,700			47,100
Goodwill		182,682			(10,904	)		171,778
Deferred tax asset		3,404			(426	)		2,978
Accounts payable		(34,526	)		576			(33,950	)
Accrued expenses		(3,876	)		105			(3,771	)
Accrued compensation costs		(5,792	)		898			(4,894	)
Deferred income taxes		(36,982	)		6,841			(30,141	)
Other liabilities		(3,546	)		(561	)		(4,107	)

Total acquisition consideration	$	331,632		$	314		$	331,946

(1): As previously reported in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2011 Form 10-K.

F-15

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. USC Acquisition (Continued)

(2)

The measurement period adjustments recorded did not have a significant impact on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income for any periods presented in 2012. In addition, these adjustments did not have a significant impact on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011. Therefore, we have recorded the cumulative impact in 2012 and have not retrospectively adjusted the comparative 2011 financial information presented herein.

(3)

The measurement period adjustments:

•: Inventories were adjusted by $2.2 million to reflect the acquisition date fair value of certain replacement parts and supplies.
•: Intangible asset adjustment of $1.7 million was primarily due to a change to the final valuation of customer relationships.
•: The net impact of measurement period adjustments resulted in a net decrease to goodwill.
•: Deferred tax decreased primarily due to the filing of the 2011 income tax returns for USC and the impact of the adjustments listed above.

The USC acquisition resulted in the recognition of $171.8 million of goodwill that will not be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill recorded represents expected synergies with the Company's existing operations with the acquired facilities including growth of new and existing customers, elimination of corporate overhead redundancies, logistical improvements and mitigation of the risk of mill downtime.

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume that the acquisition of USC occurred as of January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results includes the accounting effects of the business combination, including the application of the Company's accounting policies, amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of property, plant and equipment related to fair value adjustments, interest expense on acquisition related debt, elimination of intercompany sales and income tax effects of the adjustments. The pro forma adjustments are directly attributable to the USC acquisition, factually supportable and are expected to have a continuing impact on the Company's combined results. Unaudited pro forma data is based on historical information and does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred, nor is it indicative of future results of operations.

	December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010

	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Net sales	$	1,225,575	$	1,141,007
Net income	$	128,047	$	66,293

4. KPB Acquisition Earn-out Payment

On January 4, 2011, the Company negotiated the early settlement of its final contingent earn-out payment to International Paper Company relating to the Company's 2007 acquisition of the Kraft Papers Business ("KPB"). The Company paid $49.7 million to settle this liability in January 2011, which was recorded as additional goodwill.

F-16

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

5. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

	December 31,

	2012		2011
Raw materials	$	43,791	$	46,926
Work in process		1,987		1,780
Finished goods		39,603		36,747
Replacement parts and supplies		28,130		24,601

Total inventories	$	113,511	$	110,054

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, finished goods inventory included inventory consigned to third parties totaling $6.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

6. Plant, Property and Equipment, net

Plant, property and equipment, net consist of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

	December 31,

	2012		2011
Land and land improvements	$	29,225	$	28,956
Buildings and leasehold improvements		51,480		46,071
Machinery and equipment		686,992		633,559
Construction-in-progress		26,007		21,156

		793,704		729,742
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		217,589		162,547

Plant, property and equipment, net	$	576,115	$	567,195

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, was $56.7 million, $47.0 million and $41.7 million, respectively.

F-17

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table shows changes in goodwill and intangible assets for the years 2012 and 2011:

	Goodwill			Intangible Assets, Net

Balances at December 31, 2010	$	4,811		$	22,654
Amortization expense		—			(4,339	)
KPB acquisition earn-out payment		49,700			—
USC acquisition		182,682			45,400

Balances at December 31, 2011	$	237,193		$	63,715
Amortization expense		—			(8,388	)
USC acquisition measurement period adjustments		(10,904	)		1,700

Balances at December 31, 2012	$	226,289		$	57,027

Intangible assets other than goodwill include the following:

	December 31, 2012							December 31, 2011

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Definite-lived trademarks	$	27,700	$	(15,584	)	$	12,116	$	27,700	$	(12,120	)	$	15,580
Customer lists and relationships		49,204		(6,024	)		43,180		47,504		(1,175	)		46,329
Lease, contracts and other		15,943		(14,212	)		1,731		15,943		(14,137	)		1,806

Total	$	92,847	$	(35,820	)	$	57,027	$	91,147	$	(27,432	)	$	63,715

Estimated amortization expense for the next five years, beginning with 2013, is as follows: $8.5 million, $8.5 million, $8.5 million, $6.7 million, and $5.0 million. At December 31, 2012, the weighted average remaining useful life for trademarks is 3.5 years; customer relationships is 9 years; other contractual agreements is 21 years; and for intangible assets in total is 8 years.

8. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

	December 31,

	2012		2011
Accrued taxes other than income	$	2,891	$	4,081
Accrued energy costs		8,639		5,673
Other accruals		13,502		11,463

Total accrued expenses	$	25,032	$	21,217

F-18

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

9. Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively as follows:

	December 31,

	2012			2011
Term loan under Credit Agreement with interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 1.5% at December 31, 2012	$	305,313		$	355,313
Less current portion of debt		—			(6,094	)
Less unamortized debt issuance costs		(11,003	)		(13,584	)

Total long-term debt, net of current portion	$	294,310		$	335,635

The principal portion of long-term debt at December 31, 2012 becomes due as follows:

	Total

Fiscal year ending:
2013	$	—
2014		26,406
2015		49,219
2016		56,250
2017		173,438

Total	$	305,313

As of December 31, 2012 the Company has $63.5 million of short-term borrowings under the Revolver which was used, combined with cash on-hand, for the payment of the special cash dividend.

The Company incurred approximately $13.8 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Agreement in 2011, which is being amortized over a five-year period using the effective interest method, and recognized within interest expense, net.

Interest paid was $8.3 million, $3.8 million and $3.3 million, in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense was higher in 2012 due to a higher average term loan balance to fund the USC acquisition.

Credit Agreement

In connection with the USC acquisition on October 31, 2011, the Company entered into a credit agreement by and among the Company, Kapstone Kraft Paper Corporation, as Borrower ("Borrower") and certain subsidiaries of Borrower from time to time party thereto, as Guarantors, the lenders from time to time thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer. The credit agreement, as amended by the First Amendment and the Second Amendment, as such terms are defined hereinafter, is referred to hereinafter as the "Credit Agreement".

On May 10, 2012, Borrower and the other parties entered into a First Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the "First Amendment"). The First Amendment, among other things, expanded the "accordion" feature under the Credit Agreement, removed certain mandatory prepayment events, and modified the calculation methodology of the financial covenants. The "accordion" feature in the Credit

F-19

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

9. Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt (Continued)

Agreement now permits the Company, subject to certain terms and conditions, to request an increase in the revolving commitments and/or additional term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $450.0 million.

On November 28, 2012, Borrower and other parties entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement ("Second Amendment"). The Second Amendment amended the definition of "Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio", changed the applicable rate grid, extended the maturity date from October 31, 2016 to November 28, 2017, and permitted a one-time special cash dividend to be paid by the Company on or before December 31, 2012, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $100.0 million.

The Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured credit facility in an initial aggregate principal amount of $525.0 million (the "Credit Facility"), consisting of an initial term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million (the "Initial Term Loan") and a revolving credit facility in an initial aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million (including a letter of credit sub-facility) (the "Revolver"). The Credit Facility also includes an "accordion" feature which allows Borrower, subject to certain terms and conditions, to increase the commitments under the Credit Facility by up to $300.0 million. The proceeds of the Initial Term Loan were used, together with cash on hand, (i) to finance Borrower's acquisition of USC, (ii) to pay certain transaction fees and expenses of $13.8 million in connection with the acquisition of USC and entering in to the Credit Agreement, (iii) to repay $100.8 million of existing Company indebtedness and (iv) to provide for ongoing working capital requirements and general corporate purposes. The repayment of borrowings under the Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Company and by Borrower's domestic subsidiaries, and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, Borrower and such subsidiaries. A portion of the repayment of borrowings under the Credit Facility is guaranteed by Borrower's foreign subsidiaries.

Depending on the type of borrowing by Borrower, the applicable interest rate under the Credit Facility is calculated at a per annum rate equal to (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which is currently 1.50% for Eurodollar loans, or (b) (i) the greatest of (x) the prime rate, (y) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% or (z) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% plus (ii) an applicable margin, which is currently 0.50% for base rate loans. The unused portion of the Revolver is also subject to an unused fee that is calculated at a per annum rate (the "Unused Fee Rate"), which is currently 0.35%. Commencing with the delivery of the financial statements for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2011, the applicable margin for borrowings under the Credit Facility and the Unused Fee Rate is determined by reference to a pricing grid based on the Company's total leverage ratio. Under such pricing grid, the applicable margins for the Credit Facility ranges from 1.25% to 2.25% for Eurodollar loans and from 0.25% to 1.25% for base rate loans and the Unused Fee Rate ranges from 0.30% to 0.50%.

The Credit Facility has a maturity date of November 28, 2017, but the outstanding amounts thereunder may be prepaid at any time without premium (except for certain customary break funding payments in connection with Eurodollar loans). Net cash proceeds (in excess of certain minimum threshold amounts) from certain asset dispositions, the sale or issuance of equity securities, and the incurrence or issuance of certain indebtedness are subject to certain mandatory prepayment provisions. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, conditions to borrowing and events of default, the occurrence of which would entitle lenders to accelerate the amounts outstanding.

F-20

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

9. Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt (Continued)

In accordance with the terms of the Revolver, the Company's availability under its Revolver of $79.6 million has been reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit issued of $6.9 million as of December 31, 2012. These letters of credit were used as security for certain contractual commitments. These letters of credit will all be expiring in 2013 if not renewed.

Debt Covenants

The Company's Credit Agreement contains, among other provisions, covenants with which we must comply while they are in force. The covenants limit our ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, create additional liens on its assets, make investments, engage in mergers and acquisitions, pay dividends and sell any assets outside the normal course of business.

Under the financial covenants of the Credit Agreement, we must comply on a quarterly basis with a maximum permitted leverage ratio. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing our debt by the rolling twelve month total earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and allowable adjustments as defined in the Credit Agreement. From December 31, 2012 through September 30, 2013 the maximum permitted leverage ratio is 3.25 to 1.00. Thereafter, the maximum permitted leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00. On December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the Credit Agreement with a leverage ratio of 2.06 to 1.00.

The Credit Agreement also includes a financial covenant requiring a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing our twelve month total earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and allowable adjustments, as defined by the Credit Agreement, less cash payments for income taxes and capital expenditures by the sum of our cash interest and required principal payments during the twelve month period. From the closing date of the Credit Agreement the fixed charge coverage ratio is required to be at least 1.25 to 1.00. On December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the Credit Agreement with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 12.93 to 1.00.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company was also in compliance with all other applicable covenants in the Credit Agreement.

Fair Value of Debt

At December 31, 2012 the fair value of the Company's long-term debt approximates the carrying value of $305.3 million as the variable interest rates re-price frequently at current market rates. The debt was valued using Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy which are significant observable inputs including quoted prices for debt of similar terms and maturities.

Other Borrowing

In 2012 and 2011, the Company entered into financing agreements of $3.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, at an annual interest rate of 1.998 and 1.75 percent, respectively, for its annual property insurance premiums. The agreements required the Company to pay consecutive monthly payments through the term of each financing agreement ending on December 1st. As of December 31, 2012, there was no balance outstanding under the current agreement.

F-21

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Pension and Postretirement Benefits

The Company and its subsidiaries have a defined benefit retirement plan ("Plan") for eligible hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and stated dollar level multipliers for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and life insurance benefits ("other benefits") to qualifying employees.

We recognize the funded status of our Plans in the consolidated balance sheets. We also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, the net of tax results of the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. These amounts will be adjusted out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as they are subsequently recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost.

The changes in benefit obligations and Plan assets at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were:

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits

	2012			2011			2012			2011
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	21,888		$	14,288		$	1,453		$	1,588
Service cost		4,094			3,375			36			33
Interest cost		1,007			814			63			84
Actuarial loss (gain)		2,390			3,570			(218	)		(256	)
Participant contributions		—			—			79			87
Benefits paid		(239	)		(159	)		(52	)		(83	)

Benefit obligation at end of year	$	29,140		$	21,888		$	1,361		$	1,453

Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	12,507		$	9,255		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		1,650			282			—			—
Employer contributions		3,496			3,129			(27	)		(4	)
Participant contributions		—			—			79			87
Benefits paid		(239	)		(159	)		(52	)		(83	)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	17,414		$	12,507		$	—		$	—

F-22

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Pension and Postretirement Benefits (Continued)

The funded status and amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were:

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits

	2012			2011			2012			2011
Funded Status at End of Year	$	(11,726	)	$	(9,381	)	$	(1,361	)	$	(1,453	)

Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets
Accrued expenses	$	—		$	—		$	(70	)	$	(178	)
Other noncurrent liabilities		(11,726	)		(9,381	)		(1,291	)		(1,275	)

Net amount recognized	$	(11,726	)	$	(9,381	)	$	(1,361	)	$	(1,453	)

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss (Pre-tax)
Total net (gain) loss	$	6,016		$	4,558		$	175		$	437
Prior service cost		130			498			(1,486	)		(1,686	)

Total	$	6,146		$	5,056		$	(1,311	)	$	(1,249	)

Weighted-Average Discount Rate Assumption used to Determine Projected Benefit Obligations at December 31, 2012 and 2011		4.11	%		4.64	%		4.11	%		4.64	%

The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $29.1 million and $21.9 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs were:

	Pension Benefits									Other Benefits

	2012			2011			2010			2012			2011			2010
Service cost	$	4,094		$	3,375		$	2,859		$	36		$	33		$	111
Interest cost		1,007			814			564			63			84			160
Expected return on plan assets		(934	)		(740	)		(514	)		—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)		368			564			40			(200	)		(200	)		—
Amortization of net loss (gain)		215			—			—			45			66			(535	)

Benefit cost—Company plans		4,750			4,013			2,949			(56	)		(17	)		(264	)
Pension benefit cost—multi-employer plan		86			11			—			—			—			—

Total benefit cost	$	4,836		$	4,024		$	2,949		$	(56	)	$	(17	)	$	(264	)

The effect of a one percentage point increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rates is not material to total service and interest costs and the postretirement benefit obligation.

In conjunction with the USC acquisition, the Company also participates in a multiemployer defined benefit plan for which the Company is not the sponsor. The expense for this plan, which approximated the total funding, is included above in the components of pension benefit cost. At December 31, 2012, the estimated withdrawal liability is $3.3 million and would only be incurred if the

F-23

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Pension and Postretirement Benefits (Continued)

Company withdrew from the multiemployer plan. In accordance with ASC 715, Compensation—Retirement Benefits, this potential liability is not recognized in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other changes in Plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss were:

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits

	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net actuarial (gain) loss	$	1,673		$	4,028		$	(218	)	$	(256	)
Amortization of prior service (cost) benefit		(368	)		(564	)		200			200
Amortization of net gain (loss)		(215	)		—			(45	)		(66	)

Net amount recognized before tax	$	1,090		$	3,464		$	(63	)	$	(122	)

Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Net Expense were:

	Pension Benefits									Other Benefits

	2012			2011			2010			2012			2011			2010
Discount rate		4.64	%		5.75	%		6.00	%		4.64	%		5.75	%		6.00	%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets		6.25	%		6.50	%		6.50	%		—			—			—

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized as components of net expense during the next year are as follows:

	Pension Benefits		Other Benefits

Prior service cost (benefit)	$	130	$	(200	)
Net actuarial loss		289		19

For pension plans, accumulated actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10 percent of the accumulated benefit obligation and prior service cost are amortized over the average future service period of approximately 10 years.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 $(3.1) million and $(2.5) million, respectively, were included net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

F-24

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Pension and Postretirement Benefits (Continued)

Plan Assets

The fair value of Plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2012 was as follows:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

Equity securities:
U.S. large cap	$	—	$	3,204	$	—	$	3,204
U.S. mid cap growth		—		389		—		389
U.S. small-cap		—		397		—		397
International funds		—		1,430		—		1,430
Debt securities:
Corporate bonds		—		11,119		—		11,119
Mortgage-backed bonds		—		875		—		875

Total assets	$	—	$	17,414	$	—	$	17,414

The fair value of Plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

Equity securities:
U.S. large cap	$	—	$	2,421	$	—	$	2,421
U.S. mid cap growth		—		294		—		294
U.S. small-cap		—		307		—		307
International funds		—		973		—		973
Debt securities:
Corporate bonds		—		7,768		—		7,768
Mortgage-backed bonds		—		744		—		744

Total assets	$	—	$	12,507	$	—	$	12,507

Level 1 assets are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 assets are valued based on other significant observable inputs including quoted prices for similar securities, yield curves, indices, etc. The Level 2 assets listed above consist primarily of commingled equity investments where values are based on the net asset value of the underlying investments held, individual fixed income securities where values are based on quoted prices of similar securities and observable market data, and commingled fixed income investments where values are based on the net asset value of the underlying investments held. Level 3 assets are those where the fair value is determined based on unobservable inputs.

To develop the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the pension plans, the Company considers the current asset allocation strategy, the historical investment performance, and the expectations for future returns of each asset class.

F-25

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Pension and Postretirement Benefits (Continued)

The Company's pension plan weighted-average asset allocations and target asset allocations at December 31, 2012 and 2011, by asset category were as follows:



Equity securities	31	%	32	%	32	%
Debt securities	69	%	68	%	61	%
Real estate	—	%	—	%	7	%
Other	—	%	—	%	—	%

Total	100	%	100	%	100	%

The Company's investment strategy reflects the expectation that equity securities will outperform debt securities over the long term. Assets are invested in a prudent manner to maintain the security of funds while maximizing returns within the Company's Investment Policy guidelines. The strategy is implemented utilizing assets from the categories listed.

The investment goals are to provide a total return that, over the long term, increases the ratio of Plan assets to liabilities subject to an acceptable level of risk. This is accomplished through diversification of assets in accordance with the Investment Policy guidelines. Investment risk is mitigated by periodic rebalancing between asset classes as necessitated by changes in market conditions within the Investment Policy guidelines.

The Company currently anticipates making contributions of approximately $4.4 million to the Plan in 2013. This estimate is based on current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, which are subject to change. The Company anticipates making minimal contributions to the postretirement plan in 2013.

The following table presents estimated future gross benefit payments for the Company's Plans:

	Pension Benefits		Other Benefits

2013	$	520	$	70
2014		630		61
2015		760		68
2016		930		44
2017		1,090		21
Succeeding 5 years		8,850		157

Defined Contribution Plan

Certain employees are covered under a 401(k) defined contribution plan. The expense related to this plan was $11.2 million, $7.3 million, and $5.6 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Effective, October 31, 2011, employees of USC are included in the Company's defined contribution plan.

F-26

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

11. Income taxes

The Company's U.S. federal statutory tax rate is 35.0 percent for each of 2012, 2011 and 2010. The Company's effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 were 35.9 percent, (23.6) percent and (3.8) percent, respectively. Substantially all income was earned in the United States.

The Company's provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 consists of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2012		2011			2010
Current:
Federal	$	10,213	$	(52,358	)	$	18,879
State		1,637		(13,048	)		2,776

Total current		11,850		(65,406	)		21,655

Deferred:
Federal	$	22,794	$	40,062		$	(24,950	)
State		334		1,704			888

Total deferred		23,128		41,766			(24,062	)

Total provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	34,978	$	(23,640	)	$	(2,407	)

The Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2012			2011			2010
Statutory tax rate		35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		2.1			3.3			2.9
Manufacturing deduction		(0.9	)		—			(1.8	)
Alternative fuel mixture tax credit		—			—			(4.4	)
Cellulosic biofuel tax credit		—			—			(33.0	)
Resolution of federal tax uncertainty		—			(62.3	)		—
Other		(0.3	)		0.4			(2.5	)

Effective tax rate		35.9	%		(23.6	)%		(3.8	)%

Income taxes paid (refunded), net of refunds, were $7.0 million, $0.3 million and ($13.2) million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

F-27

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

11. Income taxes (Continued)

The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012 and 2011, for the Company are as follows:

	December 31,

	2012			2011
Deferred tax assets resulting from:
Trade accounts receivable	$	—		$	207
Inventories		3,425			2,321
Accrued compensation costs		3,315			6,582
Acquisition transaction costs		1,081			1,167
Pension and postretirement benefits		5,960			3,660
Stock based compensation		3,330			3,205
Tax credits carry-forward		28,724			36,024
Intangible assets		—			2,965
Net operating loss carry-forwards		1,084			10,440
Capital loss carry-forwards		—			9,753
Other liabilities		1,553			2,823
Accrued expenses and other		1,382			2,412

Total deferred tax assets		49,854			81,559

Valuation allowance		—			(9,753	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	49,854		$	71,806
Deferred tax liabilities resulting from:
Prepaid expenses		(1,896	)		(1,374	)
Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation		(108,194	)		(108,038	)
Intangible assets		(9,892	)		(17,706	)
Plant, property and equipment		(13,958	)		(13,866	)
Goodwill		(6,509	)		(5,090	)

Total deferred tax liabilities	$	(140,449	)	$	(146,074	)

Net deferred tax liabilities	$	(90,595	)	$	(74,268	)

The Company has $1.1 million state tax net operating loss carry-forward which is available to reduce future taxable income in various state jurisdictions and expires between 2014 and 2030.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had the following net deferred tax (liabilities) / assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

	December 31,

	2012			2011
Current deferred tax assets, net	$	5,864		$	10,048
Non-current deferred tax (liabilities) assets, net		(96,459	)		(84,316	)

Total deferred tax (liabilities) assets, net	$	(90,595	)	$	(74,268	)

F-28

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

11. Income taxes (Continued)

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, which provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Additionally, for uncertain tax positions, a threshold condition must be met for any part of the benefit of such a position to be recognized in the financial statements.

The following is a reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits:

	December 31,

	2012		2011
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year	$	4,977	$	66,958
Gross increase—tax positions prior period		—		—
Gross decrease—tax positions prior period		—		(61,981	)
Gross increase—tax positions current period		—		—
Settlement		—		—
Lapse of statute of limitations		—		—

Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year	$	4,977	$	4,977

In the year ended December 31, 2011, the IRS completed its examination of the Company's 2007 through 2009 income tax returns and as a result the Company reversed a $62.0 million tax reserve plus $1.0 million of accrued interest related to alternative fuel mixture tax credits.

Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $5.0 million. As of December 31, 2012, $5.0 million would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. Total accrued interest and penalties as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, were less than $0.1 million. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest were included in other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In August 2010, IRS approved the Company's registration as a producer of cellulosic biofuel for the tax year 2009. With this registration, the Company applied for a nonrefundable income tax credit of $1.01 per gallon of qualified cellulosic biofuel for the black liquor burned in early 2009 when the Company did not claim the alternative fuel mixture tax credit. A $21.0 million net tax benefit (net of U.S. federal and state taxes) related to cellulosic biofuel was reflected in the Company's income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company reported $23.6 million and $33.9 million as a deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets which is available to offset taxable income in future years and expires in 2015.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities. The Company's open federal tax year is 2011 and years 2009 through 2010 relating to USC. The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining the USC income tax return for 2009. The Company is subject to examination by various state jurisdictions for years 2008 through 2011.

F-29

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

12. Stockholder's equity

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In December 2009 the Company established the KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP"), effective January 1, 2010. The ESPP allows for employees to purchase shares of company stock at a five percent discount from market price. A total of 500,000 shares are reserved for future purchases under the ESPP. A total of 16,054 shares and 12,645 shares were issued under the ESPP for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Common Stock Reserved for Issuance

At December 31, 2012, approximately 1.9 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance including 1.4 million shares for stock awards and 0.5 million shares for the ESPP.

Special Cash Dividend

On November 28, 2012 the Company's Board of Directors approved a $2.00 per share special cash dividend payable to all shareholders of record as of December 10, 2012. The special cash dividend of $94.9 million was paid on December 20, 2012. At December 31, 2012, dividends payable of $0.7 million are included in the consolidated balance sheet for dividends to be paid on restricted stock units upon vesting.

13. Stock-Based Compensation

Share-Based Plan

On May 27, 2010, stockholders approved the Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan ("Incentive Plan") to increase the maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the Incentive Plan to 5.7 million shares. As of December 31, 2012, approximately 1.4 million shares were reserved for granting additional stock options, restricted stock awards or stock appreciation rights. If any award is forfeited or expires without being exercised, or if restricted stock is repurchased by the Company, the common shares subject to the Award shall be available for additional grants under the Incentive Plan. The number of shares available under the Incentive Plan is subject to adjustment in the event of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, spin-off or other similar action. Awards may be granted to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants or advisors to, the Company. Options intended to qualify, under the standards set forth in certain federal tax rules, as incentive stock options ("ISOs") may be granted only to employees while actually employed by the Company. Non-employee directors, consultants and advisors are not entitled to receive ISOs. Option awards granted under the Incentive Plan are exercisable for a period fixed by the administrator, but no longer than 10 years from the date of grant, at an exercise price which is not less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of the grant.

The Company's Compensation Committee approves all stock awards. The Company accounts for stock awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation , which requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized as compensation cost over the vesting period based on the fair value of the instrument on the date of grant.

F-30

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

Total non-cash stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2012		2011		2010
Stock option compensation expense	$	2,910	$	2,234	$	2,023
Restricted stock compensation expense		2,332		1,751		1,569

Total stock-based compensation expense	$	5,242	$	3,985	$	3,592

Total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the stock options and restricted stock as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

	December 31,

	2012		2011
Unrecognized stock option compensation cost	$	1,910	$	1,648
Unrecognized restricted stock compensation cost		1,749		1,687

Total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost	$	3,659	$	3,335

As of December 31, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years and 1.9 years, respectively.

ASC 718 requires that cash flows relating to the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. The Company recognized excess tax benefits of $8.0 million, $1.3 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Stock Options

In 2012, 2011, and 2010 the Company granted stock options for 312,971, 285,461, and 450,098 common shares respectively, to executive officers, directors and employees as compensation for service. The Company's outstanding stock options vest as follows: 50% after two years and the remaining 50% after three years. Stock options granted in 2012, 2011, and 2010 have a contractual term of ten years. The stock options are subject to forfeiture should these employees terminate their employment with the Company for certain reasons prior to vesting in their awards, or the occurrence of certain other events such as termination with cause. The exercise price of these stock options is based on closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded on an accelerated basis over the awards' vesting periods.

In November, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share. In accordance with the Company's Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Plan, the Company's Compensation Committee selected a $2.00 reduction to the exercise price for the 2,580,024 unexercised stock options. The modification did not result in any incremental fair value or compensation cost.

F-31

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

A summary of information related to stock options is as follows:

			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2009	2,162,077		$	5.66
Granted	450,098			11.36
Exercised	(186,171	)		6.88
Lapsed (forfeited or cancelled)	(5,528	)		4.91

Outstanding at December 31, 2010	2,420,476			6.62
Granted	285,461			16.61
Exercised	(221,973	)		5.70
Lapsed (forfeited or cancelled)	(10,090	)		6.50

Outstanding at December 31, 2011	2,473,874			7.86
Granted	312,971			19.75
Exercised	(1,494,791	)		5.96
Lapsed (forfeited or cancelled)	(10,126	)		16.48

Outstanding at December 31, 2012	1,281,928		$	10.91	7.33	$	14,459

Exercisable at December 31, 2012	473,073		$	4.95	5.59	$	8,155

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $23.4 million, $2.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

The weighted average fair value of the Company stock options granted in 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $10.38, $7.65, and $4.90, respectively. The fair value of awards granted in 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $3.2 million, $2.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the market price at the grant date and the weighted average assumptions specific to the underlying options. The Company uses the "simplified method", defined in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107, to determine the expected term assumption for all of its options. The Company uses the "simplified method", as permitted by SAB No. 110, as it does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected life due to the limited time its equity shares have been publicly traded. For 2012 the expected volatility assumption is based on the volatility of the Company's common stock from the same time period as the expected term of the stock options. In 2011 and 2010 the expected volatility assumption was based on an average of peer companies. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with a term similar to the expected life of the stock options.

F-32

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The assumptions utilized for determining the fair value of stock options awarded during the years 2012, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

	December 31,

	2012			2011			2010
Weighted average expected volatility		56.47	%		45.2	%		41.5	%
Weighted average expected term (years)		5.99			5.94			5.94
Risk-free interest rate		1.10	%		2.5	%		2.4	%
Expected dividend yield		—	%		—	%		—	%

Restricted Stock

In 2012, 2011 and 2010 the Company granted restricted stock units of 125,191, 114,199, and 166,534, respectively, to executive officers, directors, and employees as compensation for service. These are restricted as to transferability until they vest three years from the grant date. These restricted shares are subject to forfeiture should these employees terminate their employment with the Company for certain reasons prior to vesting in their awards, or the occurrence of certain other events. The value of these restricted shares is based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant and compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the awards' vesting periods.

In November 2012, the Company's Compensation Committee adopted a resolution directing that the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreements pertaining to the RSUs awarded on May 27, 2010 be amended to reflect an accelerated vesting date of November 28, 2012 except for the Company's Chief Operating Officer and certain grantees who attained the age of 65 years on or prior to November 28, 2012. Accordingly, 71,877 restricted stock units vested on November 28, 2012.

F-33

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The following table summarizes non-vested restricted stock amounts and activity:

			Weighted Average Grant Price

Outstanding at December 31, 2009	585,669		$	5.68
Granted	166,534			11.36
Vested	(172,750	)		6.76
Forfeited	(1,780	)		4.95

Outstanding at December 31, 2010	577,673		$	7.00
Granted	114,199			16.61
Vested	(191,685	)		6.98
Forfeited	(3,792	)		6.85

Outstanding at December 31, 2011	496,395		$	9.22
Granted	125,191			19.75
Vested	(288,661	)		5.61
Forfeited	(7,163	)		15.54

Outstanding at December 31, 2012	325,762		$	16.36

The fair value of awards granted in 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $2.5 million, $1.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The fair value of awards vested in 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $1.6 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

14. Commitments and Contingencies

Commercial Commitments

The Company's commercial commitments as of December 31, 2012 represent commitments not recorded on the balance sheet, but potentially triggered by future events, primarily consist of letters of credit to provide security for certain transactions and operating leases as requested by third parties. The Company had $6.9 million and $8.0 million of these commitments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, with all expiring in 2013 if not renewed. No amounts have been drawn under these letters of credit.

Legal claims

We are from time to time subject to various administrative and legal investigations, claims and proceedings incidental to our business, including environmental and safety matters, labor and employments matters, personal injury claims, contractual disputes and taxes. We establish reserves for claims and proceedings when it is probable that liabilities exist and where reasonable estimates can be made. We also maintain insurance that may limit our financial exposure for defense costs, as well as liability, if any, for claims covered by the insurance (subject also to deductibles and self-insurance amounts). While any investigation, claim or proceeding has an element of uncertainty, and we cannot predict or assure the outcome of any claim or proceeding involving the Company, we believe the outcome of any of any pending or threatened claim or proceeding (other than those that cannot be

F-34

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

14. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

assessed due to their preliminary nature), or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Operating Leases

The Company leases space for eleven of its corrugated manufacturing plants with the majority of space leased through 2032. The leases include a provision for a one percent rent increase beginning in 2020.

Future minimum rentals under non-cancellable leases

The following represents the Company's future minimum rental payments due under non-cancellable operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of the following years:

Years Ending December 31,

2013	$	10,616
2014		9,745
2015		8,665
2016		8,337
2017		6,942
Thereafter		62,011

Total	$	106,316

The Company's rental expense under operating leases amounted to $12.0 million, $6.6 million and $4.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Purchase Obligation

In conjunction with the CKD acquisition, the Company entered into a long-term fiber supply agreement with MWV. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company's North Charleston mill will purchase approximately 25 percent of its pine pulpwood and 60 percent of its saw timber requirements for a period of 15 years and expiring in 2023. The purchases are based on market prices and are accounted for as raw materials. The Company's North Charleston mill purchased approximately $42.9 million, $45.8 million, and $41.7 million of materials in accordance with the agreement for years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

F-35

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

15. Net income per share

The Company's basic and diluted net income per share is calculated as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2012		2011		2010
Net income as reported	$	62,505	$	123,981	$	65,041
Weighted average number of common shares for basic net income per share		46,713,456		46,287,183		45,854,237
Incremental effect of dilutive common stock equivalents:
Underwriter's purchase option		—		—		54,212
Unexercised stock option awards		744,828		879,590		721,385
Unvested restricted stock awards		268,155		320,850		349,226

Weighted average number of shares for diluted net income per share		47,726,439		47,487,623		46,979,060

Net income per share—basic	$	1.34	$	2.68	$	1.42
Net income per share—diluted	$	1.31	$	2.61	$	1.38

A total of 481 and 21,497 unexercised stock options were outstanding at December 31, 2012, and 2011, respectively but were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share because the awards were anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive shares in 2010.

16. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables set forth the historical unaudited quarterly financial data for fiscal 2012 and 2011. The information for each of these periods has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, reflects all adjustments consisting only of normal

F-36

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

16. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Continued)

recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial results. Operating results for previous periods do not necessarily indicate results that may be achieved in any future period.

	Quarters Ended

Fiscal 2012:	March 31, 2012		June 30, 2012		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2012
Net sales	$	299,843	$	306,259	$	309,544	$	300,991
Gross profit(1)	$	44,850	$	49,661	$	46,903	$	37,537
Operating income	$	27,476	$	32,455	$	31,064	$	18,565
Net income	$	15,563	$	18,404	$	18,345	$	10,193
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.33	$	0.39	$	0.39	$	0.22
Diluted	$	0.33	$	0.39	$	0.38	$	0.22

(1): Gross profit is defined as net sales less cost of sales, depreciation and amortization, freight, and distribution expenses. Gross profit includes planned maintenance outage costs of $13.3 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2012.

	Quarters Ended

Fiscal 2011:	March 31, 2011		June 30, 2011		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2011
Net sales	$	206,738	$	214,786	$	215,842	$	268,753
Gross profit(1)	$	34,467	$	39,184	$	38,525	$	34,651
Operating income	$	25,449	$	30,608	$	30,097	$	20,587
Net income(2)	$	15,131	$	18,159	$	16,495	$	74,196
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.33	$	0.39	$	0.36	$	1.60
Diluted	$	0.32	$	0.38	$	0.35	$	1.56

(1): Gross profit is defined as net sales less cost of sales, depreciation, amortization, freight, and distribution expenses. Gross profit includes planned maintenance outage costs of $11.1 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2011.
(2): Net income in the quarter ended December 31, 2011 includes a reversal of tax reserves of $63.0 million relating to the alternative fuel mixture tax credit.

Note: The sum of the quarters may not equal the total of the respective year's earnings per share on either a basic or diluted basis due to changes in the weighted average shares outstanding throughout the year.

F-37

Exhibit 10.2

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING
2006 INCENTIVE PLAN

(amended and restated as of May 18, 2012)

1. Purpose . KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“KapStone”), desires to attract and retain the best available talent and to encourage the highest level of performance. The KapStone Paper and Packaging 2006 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is intended to contribute significantly to the attainment of these objectives by affording eligible employees and independent contractors of KapStone and its Affiliates (as defined in Section 20) (collectively, with KapStone, the “Company”) the opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in KapStone through the grant of (i) stock options (“Options”) to purchase shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share, of KapStone (the “Common Stock”), (ii) restricted shares or the right to receive shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Stock”) and (iii) stock appreciation rights to receive a payment in Common Stock or cash equal to the amount of the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise over the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of grant (“Stock Appreciation Rights”; and collectively with Options and Restricted Stock, “Awards”, and each individually an “Award”).

2. Administration .

(a) The Plan shall be administered by a committee (the “Committee”) of not fewer than two members of the board of directors of KapStone (the “Board”) who shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board. To the extent necessary to comply with Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and, to the extent necessary to exclude Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan from the calculation of the income tax deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), each member of the Committee shall be an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum.

(b) The Committee shall have and may exercise all of the powers of the Board under the Plan, other than the power to appoint a director to Committee membership. The Committee shall have plenary authority in its discretion, subject to and consistent with the express provisions of the Plan, to direct the grants of Awards; to determine the numbers of shares of Common Stock covered by each Award, the purchase price, if any, of the Common Stock covered by each Award, the individuals to whom an Award is given (each a “Grantee”), the time or times at which the Award shall be granted or may vest; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including, without limitation, such rules and regulations as it shall deem advisable so that transactions involving Awards may qualify for exemption under such rules and regulations as the Securities and Exchange Commission may promulgate from time to time exempting transactions from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act; to determine the terms and provisions of, and to cause the Company to enter into, agreements with Grantees in connection with Awards under the Plan (“Award Agreements”), which Award Agreements may vary from one another, as the Committee shall deem appropriate; to amend any Award Agreement from time to time with the consent of the Grantee; and to make all other determinations the Committee may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Committee shall have discretion to include such provisions in the Award Agreements as it shall deem appropriate, including those related to non-competition, non-solicitation of employees or customers, the forfeiture of Awards or profits relating thereto upon a finding of fraud or other material misconduct on the part of a Grantee, or such other provisions, not inconsistent with law or the requirements of the Plan as it may from time to time determine appropriate. Every action, decision, interpretation or determination made by the Committee or the Board with respect to the application or administration of the Plan shall be conclusive and binding upon the Company and any person having or claiming any interest pursuant to any Award granted under the Plan.

(c) Except as otherwise required by law, no member of the Board or the Committee shall be liable for anything whatsoever in connection with the administration of the Plan other than such member’s own willful misconduct. Under no circumstances shall any member of the Board or the Committee be liable for any act or omission of any other member of the Board or the Committee. The Board and the Committee shall be entitled to rely, in the performance of its functions with respect to the Plan, upon information and advice furnished by KapStone’s officers, KapStone’s accountants, KapStone’s legal counsel and any other party the Board and Committee deems necessary. No member of the Board or Committee shall be liable for any action taken or not taken in reliance upon any such advice.

(d) Each Award under the Plan shall be deemed to have been granted when the determination of the Committee with respect to such Award is made. Once an Award has been granted, all conditions and requirements of the Plan with respect to such Award shall be deemed conditions on exercise, not grant.

(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the Plan, the Committee shall have no authority to issue Awards under the Plan under terms and conditions which would cause such Awards to be considered nonqualified “deferred compensation” subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, including by way of example but not limitation, no Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be issued with an exercise price below Fair Market Value and all Restricted Stock shall be issued and reported as income to the Grantee no later than the fifteenth (15 th ) day of the third calendar month after the end of the calendar year in which the right to the shares covered by such Award becomes vested.

3. Eligible Persons . Subject in the case of ISOs to Section 7(g)(i), Awards may be granted to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, the Company. In determining the persons to whom Awards shall be made and the number of shares to be covered by each Award, the Committee shall take into account the duties of the respective persons, their present and potential contributions to the success of the Company and other factors deemed relevant by the Committee in connection with accomplishing the purposes of the Plan.

4. Share Limitations under the Plan .

(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14 and the provisions of this Section 4, a maximum of five million seven hundred thousand (5,700,000) shares of Common Stock shall be reserved for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan. If an Award is forfeited or expires without being exercised, or if Restricted Stock is repurchased by the Company as provided in Section 8(e), the shares of Common Stock subject to the Award shall be available for additional grants under the Plan. If an Option is exercised in whole or in part by a Grantee tendering previously owned shares of Common Stock, or if any shares are withheld in connection with the exercise of an Option to pay the exercise price or to satisfy the Grantee’s tax liability, the full number of shares in respect of which the Option has been exercised shall be applied against the limit set forth in this Section 4(a).

(b) KapStone may grant Options under the Plan in substitution for options held by employees of another corporation who become employees of KapStone or an Affiliate as the result of a merger or consolidation of the employing corporation with KapStone or an Affiliate, or as a result of the acquisition by KapStone or an Affiliate of property or stock of the employing corporation. Substitute Options shall be granted on such terms as the Committee considers appropriate in the circumstances and in compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Substitute Options shall be in addition to the limit set forth in Section 4(a).

(c) The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to Awards that a Grantee may be granted within one fiscal year of KapStone shall be five hundred thousand (500,000).

(d) The aggregate numbers set forth in this Section 4 shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14.

5. Term of Award . The term of each Award shall be fixed by the Committee and specified in the applicable Award Agreement, but in no event shall it be more than ten years from the date of grant. Subject in the case of ISOs to Section 7(g), the term of an Award may be extended from time to time by the Committee, provided that no extension shall extend the term beyond ten years from the date of grant.

6. Vesting . The Committee shall determine the vesting schedule applicable to a particular Award and specify the vesting schedule in the applicable Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing the Committee may accelerate the vesting of an Award at any time.

7. Options .

(a) Type of Options . Options granted under the Plan may be either incentive stock options (“ISOs”) intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or nonqualified stock options (“NSOs”) which are not intended to meet such Code requirements.

(b) Rights to Purchase . The Committee may grant Options to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, the Company, in such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, including such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Committee may impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the Committee shall determine.

(c) Option Agreement . The terms and conditions of each Option shall be set forth in an Option Agreement in the form approved by the Committee. Each Option Agreement shall, at a minimum, specify (i) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option, (ii) whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or NSO, (iii) the provisions related to vesting and exercisability of the Option, including the Option exercise price, and (iv) that the Option is subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan. Option Agreements may differ from one another.

(d) Termination of Relationship to the Company .

i. With respect to an Option granted to an individual who is an employee of the Company at the time of Option grant, unless the Option Agreement expressly provides to the contrary, (i) the Option shall terminate immediately upon the Grantee’s termination of employment for Cause (as defined in Section 20); (ii) subject in the case of ISOs to Section 7(g), the Option shall terminate two years following the Grantee’s termination of employment by reason of death or Disability (as defined in Section 20); (iii) subject in the case of ISOs to Section 7(g), the Option shall terminate two years after Retirement (as defined in Section 20); (iv) the Option shall terminate three months after the Grantee’s termination of employment for any other reason; and (v) vesting of an Option will terminate in all cases immediately upon termination of employment. In no event shall an Option remain exercisable beyond the expiration date specified in the applicable Option Agreement. An Option Agreement may contain such provisions as the Board shall approve with reference to the determination of the date employment terminates for purposes of the Plan and the effect of leaves of absence, which provisions may vary from one another.

ii. With respect to an Option granted to an individual who is not an employee of the Company at the time of Option grant, the Board shall determine and specify in the applicable Option Agreement the consequences, if any, of the termination of the Grantee’s relationship with the Company.

(e) Option Price . Subject in the case of ISOs to Section 7(g), the exercise price per share of Common Stock covered by an Option shall be established by the Committee; provided, however, that (a) the exercise price per share for any Option shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Option is granted and (b) no ISO granted to a 10% Shareholder (as defined in Section 7(g)) shall have an exercise price per share less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Option is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option (whether an ISO or NSO) may be granted with an exercise price lower than the minimum exercise price set forth above if such Option is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another option in a manner qualifying under the provision of Sections 409A and 424(a) of the Code.

(f) No Stockholder Rights . No Grantee shall have the rights of a stockholder with respect to shares covered by an Option until such person becomes the holder of record of such shares.

(g) ISO Provisions .

i. Employment Requirement; Termination of Employment, Death or Disability . ISOs may only be awarded to employees of KapStone or a corporation which, with respect to KapStone, is a “parent corporation” or “subsidiary corporation” within the meaning of Sections 424(e) and (f) of the Code. No ISO may be exercised unless, at the time of such exercise, the Grantee is, and has been continuously since the date of grant of his or her option, employed by the Company, except that:

(1) an ISO may be exercised within the period of three months after the date the Grantee ceases to be an employee of the Company (or within such lesser period as may be specified in the applicable Option Agreement), provided, that the Option Agreement may designate a longer exercise period and that the exercise after such three-month period shall be treated as the exercise of a NSO under the Plan;

(2) if the Grantee dies while in the employ of the Company, or within three months after the Grantee ceases to be such an employee, the ISO may be exercised by the person to whom it is transferred by will or the laws of descent and distribution within the period of one year after the date of death (or within such lesser period as may be specified in the applicable Option Agreement); provided, that the Option Agreement may designate a longer exercise period and that the exercise after such one-year period shall be treated as the exercise of a NSO under the Plan; and

(3)

if while in the employ of the Company the Grantee becomes disabled within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code or any successor provisions thereto, the ISO may be exercised within the period of one year after the date the Grantee ceases to be such an employee because of such disability (or within such lesser period as may be specified in the applicable Option Agreement) provided, that the Option Agreement may designate a longer exercise period and that the exercise after such one-year period shall be treated as the exercise of a NSO under the Plan.

For all purposes of the Plan and any Option granted hereunder, “employment” shall be defined in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.421-7(h) of the Income Tax Regulations (or any successor regulations). Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, no ISO may be exercised after its expiration date.

ii. 10% Shareholders . In the case of an individual who at the time the Option is granted owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the stock of KapStone or of a parent or subsidiary corporation of KapStone (a “10% Shareholder”), (i) the Option exercise price of any ISO granted to such person shall in no event be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Common

Stock on the date the ISO is granted and (ii) the term of an ISO granted to such person may not exceed five years from the date of grant.

iii. $100,000 Limit . The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time an ISO is granted) of the Common Stock covered by ISOs exercisable for the first time by an employee during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company) may not exceed $100,000.

iv. Options Which Do Not Satisfy ISO Requirements . To the extent that any Option which is issued under the Plan exceeds the limit set forth in paragraph (c) or otherwise does not comply with the requirements of Code Section 422, it shall be treated as a NSO.

(h) Cancellation and New Grant of Options, Etc . The Committee shall have the authority to effect, at any time and from time to time, with the consent of the affected Grantees, (i) the cancellation of any or all outstanding Options under the Plan and the grant in substitution therefor of new Options under the Plan covering the same or different numbers of shares of Common Stock and having an Option exercise price per share which may be lower or higher than the exercise price per share of the cancelled Options or (ii) the amendment of the terms of any and all outstanding Options under the Plan to provide an Option exercise price per share which is higher or lower than the then-current exercise price per share of such outstanding options; provided, however, that the Committee shall not take any of the actions described in (i) or (ii) hereof without receiving the approval of KapStone ‘s stockholders. The provisions of this Section 7(h) may not be altered or amended without stockholder approval.

(i) Buyout Provisions . The Committee may at any time offer to buy out for a payment in cash or shares, an Option previously granted, based on such terms and conditions as the Committee shall establish and communicate to the Grantee at the time that such offer is made; provided, however, that the Committee shall not be permitted to take such action with regard to any Option the exercise price of which, on the date in question, is in excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock without receiving the approval of KapStone’s stockholders. The provisions of this Section 7(i) may not be altered or amended without stockholder approval.

(j) No Deferral Feature . The Option Agreement shall not provide for any deferral feature with respect to an Option constituting a deferral of compensation under Section 409A of the Code.

8. Restricted Stock .

(a) Type of Restricted Stock. Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be either restricted stock shares (“RS Shares”) or restricted stock units (“RS Units”). “RS Shares” means Shares which are issued and awarded to Grantees subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer of such Shares during a specified period as provided in subsection (b). “RS Units” means bookkeeping units that represent the right of a Grantee to receive the specified number of Shares upon lapse of the substantial risk of forfeiture and other restrictions on such Shares during the specified period as provided in subsection (b).

(b) Rights to Purchase . The Committee may grant Restricted Stock to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, the Company, in such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, including such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Committee may impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the Committee shall determine. Grantees shall not be required to pay cash or other consideration for Restricted Stock granted hereunder, other than in the form of services performed under such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine.

(c) Restricted Stock Grant Agreement . Restricted Stock shall be granted under a Restricted Stock Grant Agreement that shall specify whether the Restricted Stock is an Award of RS Shares or RS Units, the number of RS Shares or RS Units granted, and the terms of the restrictions referred to in subsection (b). If the Award is made in the form of RS Shares, then (i) the Award shall be further evidenced by certificates or other indicia of ownership for the Shares registered in the name of the Grantee and referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such RS Shares; (ii) the Award of RS Shares shall be entered upon the records of the duly authorized transfer agent of the

Company as soon as practicable after the Award; but (iii) the Company may retain physical possession of any such certificates, and the Company may require a Grantee awarded RS Shares to deliver a stock power to the Company, endorsed in blank, relating to the RS Shares for so long as the Restricted Stock is subject to risk of forfeiture.

(d) Termination of Employment Prior to Vesting of Restricted Stock . Unless the Restricted Stock Grant Agreement expressly provides to the contrary, immediately upon the termination of the Grantee’s status as an employee, officer or director of, or consultant or advisor to, the Company for any reason other than the death or Disability of the Grantee, Restricted Stock granted to such Grantee that has not vested prior to such time may no longer vest, and Grantee shall forfeit all rights (and the Company shall have no further obligations) with respect to such Restricted Stock. In the event of the death or Disability of the Grantee, the Award shall immediately vest in full.

(e) Repurchase Right . The Committee may in its sole discretion provide that a Restricted Stock Grant Agreement shall grant the Company the right to repurchase RS Shares upon the termination for specified reasons or any reason of the purchaser’s status as an employee, officer, director of, or consultant or advisor to, the Company. The purchase price for the RS Shares repurchased by the Company pursuant to such repurchase right and the rate at which such repurchase right shall lapse (if any) shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and shall be set forth in the Restricted Stock Grant Agreement.

(f) Other Provisions . The Restricted Stock Grant Agreement shall contain such other terms, provisions and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(g) Rights as a Shareholder . Unless otherwise provided in the Restricted Stock Grant Agreement:

i. A Grantee awarded RS Shares that have not been forfeited shall have the rights of a stockholder with respect to such RS Shares from and after the date that the Award of RS Shares is entered upon the records of the duly authorized transfer agent of the Company, including without limitation the right to vote such RS Shares and the right to receive dividends declared on the RS Shares; provided , however , that any dividend in Shares on RS Shares shall be held subject to the same restrictions and for the same period as the RS Shares to which they relate.

ii. A Grantee awarded RS Units that have not been forfeited shall have no rights as a stockholder (unless and until Shares are issued in respect of such RS Unites upon lapse of the substantial risk of forfeiture), including without limitation no right to vote Shares represented by such RS Units; provided, however , that if dividends (other than dividends in Shares) are paid on Shares represented by RS Units, then the Company will cumulate amounts equivalent to the amount of dividends and pay to the Grantee such amount when the restrictions lapse; and if dividends in Shares are paid on Shares, the Company will credit the Grantee with additional RS Units equal to the per-share dividend on RS Units that have not yet either vested or been forfeited, with such additional RS Units being subject to the same restrictions and for the same period as the RS Units to which they relate.

(h) No Deferral Provisions . A Restricted Stock Award shall not provide for any deferral of compensation recognition after vesting with respect to Restricted Stock which would cause the Award to constitute a deferral of compensation which is not in compliance with Section 409A of the Code.

9. Stock Appreciation Rights .

(a) Rights to Purchase . The Committee may grant Stock Appreciation Rights to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, the Company, in such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, including such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Committee may impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the Committee shall determine. No Stock Appreciation Rights shall be granted under the terms and conditions which would cause such rights to be treated as deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code. Grantees shall not be required to pay cash or other consideration for Stock Appreciation Rights granted hereunder, other than in the form of services performed under such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine.

(b) Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement . Stock Appreciation Rights shall be granted under a Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement. Each Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement shall, at a minimum, specify (i) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Stock Appreciation Right, (ii) the provisions related to vesting and exercisability of the Stock Appreciation Right, including the base price, and (iii) that the Stock Appreciation Right is subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan. Stock Appreciation Rights Agreements may differ from one another.

i . With respect to a Stock Appreciation Right granted to an individual who is an employee of the Company at the time of Stock Appreciation Right grant, unless the Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement expressly provides to the contrary, (i) the Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate immediately upon the Grantee’s termination of employment for Cause (as defined in Section 20); (ii) the Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate two years following the Grantee’s termination of employment by reason of death or Disability (as defined in Section 20); (iii) the Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate two years after Retirement (as defined in Section 20); (iv) the Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate three months after the Grantee’s termination of employment for any other reason; and (v) vesting of a Stock Appreciation Right will terminate in all cases immediately upon termination of employment. In no event shall a Stock Appreciation Right remain exercisable beyond the expiration date specified in the applicable Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement. A Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement may contain such provisions as the Board shall approve with reference to the determination of the date employment terminates for purposes of the Plan and the effect of leaves of absence, which provisions may vary from one another.

ii. With respect to a Stock Appreciation Right granted to an individual who is not an employee of the Company at the time of Stock Appreciation Right grant, the Board shall determine and specify in the applicable Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement the consequences, if any, of the termination of the Grantee’s relationship with the Company.

(d) Base Price . The base price per share of Common Stock covered by a Stock Appreciation Right shall be established by the Committee; provided, however, that the base price per share for any Stock Appreciation Right shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Stock Appreciation Right may be granted with a base price lower than the minimum base price set forth above if such Stock Appreciation Right is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another Stock Appreciation Right in a manner qualifying under the provision of Sections 409A and 424(a) of the Code.

(e) Other Provisions . The Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement shall contain such other terms, provisions and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(f) Rights as a Shareholder . No Grantee shall have the rights of a stockholder with respect to shares covered by a Stock Appreciation Right until such person becomes the holder of record of such shares.

(g) Cancellation and New Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights, Etc . The Committee shall have the authority to effect, at any time and from time to time, with the consent of the affected Grantees, (i) the cancellation of any or all outstanding Stock Appreciation Rights under the Plan and the grant in substitution therefor of new Stock Appreciation Rights under the Plan covering the same or different numbers of shares of Common Stock and having a base price per share which may be lower or higher than the base price per share of the cancelled Stock Appreciation Rights or (ii) the amendment of the terms of any and all outstanding Stock Appreciation Rights under the Plan to provide a base price per share which is higher or lower than the then-current base price per share of such outstanding Stock Appreciation Rights; provided, however, that the Committee shall not take any of the actions described in (i) or (ii) hereof without receiving the approval of KapStone ‘s stockholders. The provisions of this Section 9(g) may not be altered or amended without stockholder approval.

(h) Buyout Provisions . The Committee may at any time offer to buy out for a payment in cash or shares, a Stock Appreciation Right previously granted, based on such terms and conditions as the Committee shall establish and communicate to the Grantee at the time that such offer is made; provided, however, that the Committee shall not be

permitted to take such action with regard to any Stock Appreciation Right the base price of which, on the date in question, is in excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock without receiving the approval of KapStone’s stockholders. The provisions of this Section 9(h) may not be altered or amended without stockholder approval..

(i) No Deferral Feature . The Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement shall not provide for any deferral feature with respect to a Stock Appreciation Right constituting a deferral of compensation under Section 409A of the Code.

10. Exercise of Awards .

(a) An Award other than a Restricted Stock Award may be exercised at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, as to any or all full shares as to which such Award is then exercisable. An Award may not be exercised with respect to a fractional share. A Grantee (or other person who, pursuant to Section 11, may exercise the Award) shall exercise the Award by delivering to KapStone in the manner provided in the Award Agreement a written notice of exercise, stating the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the exercise is being made. Upon receipt by KapStone of any notice of exercise, the exercise of the Award as set forth in that notice shall be irrevocable.

(b) Upon exercise of an Option, the Grantee shall pay to KapStone the Option exercise price per share of Common Stock multiplied by the number of full shares as to which the Option is then exercised. A Grantee may pay the Option exercise price by (i) tendering or causing to be tendered to KapStone cash, (ii) delivery or deemed delivery of shares of Common Stock owned by the Grantee having a Fair Market Value equal to the exercise price, (iii) authorizing KapStone to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered to the Grantee having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the exercise price, (iv) delivery of other property permitted by law and acceptable to the Board or Committee, or (v) any other means which the Board or Committee determines are consistent with the purpose of the Plan and with applicable laws and regulations (including, without limitation, the provisions of Rule 16b-3 and Regulation T promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board).

(c) The Company shall, in its sole discretion, take any action reasonably believed by it to be necessary to comply with local, state or federal tax laws relating to the reporting and withholding of taxes. In the event a Grantee has exercised an Award, a Grantee shall, upon notification of the amount due, promptly pay or cause to be paid the amount determined by the Company as necessary to satisfy all applicable tax withholding requirements. A Grantee may satisfy his or her tax withholding requirement in any manner satisfactory to the Company.

(d) Any certificates or other indicia of ownership representing the shares as to which an Award has been exercised shall refer to the restrictions applicable to such shares.

11. Nontransferability .

(a) Except as provided in Section 11 (b), Awards granted under the Plan shall not be assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised during the lifetime of the Grantee only by the Grantee or by the Grantee’s guardian or legal representative. In the event of any attempt by a Grantee to transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of an Award or any right thereunder, except as provided for herein, or in the event of the levy of any attachment, execution or similar process upon the rights or interest hereby conferred, KapStone may terminate the Award (making such Award null and void) or repurchase the RS Shares as provided in Section 8(e) by notice to the Grantee.

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), if (and on the terms) so provided in the applicable Option Agreement, a Grantee may transfer a NSO, by gift or a domestic relations order, to a Family Member (as defined in Section 20) of the Grantee. If a NSO is transferred in accordance with this subparagraph, the Option shall be exercisable solely by the transferee, but the determination of the exercisability of the Option shall be based solely on the activities and state of affairs of the Grantee. Thus, for example, if, after a transfer with respect to an Option, the Grantee ceases to be an employee of the Company, such termination shall trigger the provisions of Section 7(d) hereof. Conversely, if after a

transfer the transferee ceases to be an employee of the Company, such termination shall not trigger the provisions of Section 7(d) hereof.

12. Compliance with Law; Registration of Shares .

(a) The Plan and any grant hereunder shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations of any applicable jurisdiction or authority or agency thereof and to such approvals by any regulatory or governmental agency which, in the opinion of Company’s counsel, may be required or appropriate.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or Award Agreements made pursuant hereto, the Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificate or certificates for shares of Common Stock under the Plan prior to fulfillment of all of the following conditions:

i. Effectiveness of any registration or other qualification of such shares of the Company under any law or regulation of any applicable jurisdiction or authority or agency thereof which the Board shall, in its absolute discretion or upon the advice of counsel, deem necessary or advisable; and

ii. Grant of any other consent, approval or permit from any applicable jurisdiction or authority or agency thereof or securities exchange or quotation system which the Board shall, in its absolute discretion or upon the advice of counsel, deem necessary or advisable.

The Company shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain any consent, approval or permit described above; provided, however, that except to the extent as may be specified in an Award Agreement with respect to any particular grant, the Company shall be under no obligation to register or qualify any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award under any federal or state securities law or on any exchange.

13. Change in Control.

(a) In the event that a Change in Control occurs, the Board may determine that (i) any Option shall be assumed, or a substantially equivalent Award shall be substituted, by an acquiring or succeeding entity (or an affiliate thereof) on such terms as the Board determines to be appropriate; (ii) upon written notice to the Grantee, provide that the Award shall terminate immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction unless exercised by the Grantee within a specified period following the date of the notice; (iii) in the event that the Change in Control is a sale or similar transaction under the terms of which holders of Common Stock receive a payment for each share of Common Stock surrendered in the transaction (the “Sales Price”), make or provide for a payment to each Grantee equal to the amount by which (A) the Sales Price times the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Award (to the extent such Award is then exercisable) exceeds (B) the aggregate exercise or base price, if any, for all such shares of Common Stock; or (iv) may make such other equitable adjustments as the Board deems appropriate.

(b) “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) any “person” (as that term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly, of securities representing 35% or more of the combined voting power for election of directors of the then outstanding securities of the Company or any successor of the Company; (ii) during any period of two consecutive years or less, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board cease, for any reason, to constitute at least a majority of the Board, unless the election or nomination for election of each new director was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period; (iii) the consummation of the liquidation of the Company or the sale or other disposition of 50% or more of the assets of the Company; or (iv) the consummation of any merger or consolidation to which the Company is a party as a result of which the persons who were share owners of the Company immediately prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation will have beneficial ownership of less than 50% of the combined voting power for election of directors of the surviving corporation following the effective date of such merger or consolidation.

14. Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization .

(a) In the event of any stock dividend or split, recapitalization, combination, exchange or similar change affecting the Common Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, the Committee shall make any or all of the following adjustments as it deems appropriate to equitably reflect such event: (i) adjust the aggregate number of shares (or such other security as is designated by the Board) which may be acquired pursuant to the Plan, (ii) adjust the purchase price to be paid for any or all such shares subject to the then outstanding Awards, (iii) adjust the number of shares of Common Stock (or such other security as is designated by the Board) subject to any or all of the then outstanding Awards and (iv) make any other equitable adjustments or take such other equitable action as the Board, in its discretion, shall deem appropriate. For purposes hereof, the conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.”

(b) Any and all adjustments or actions taken by the Board pursuant to this Section 14 shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes.

15. No Right to Continued Employment . Neither the Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any employee or any independent contractor any right to continue in the employ of or to be engaged as an independent contractor by the Company or affect the right of the Company to terminate such person’s employment or other relationship with the Company at any time.

16. Amendment; Early Termination . Subject to Sections 7(h) and 9(g), the Board may at any time and from time to time alter, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan in whole or in part; provided, however, that no amendment requiring stockholder approval by law or by the rules of any stock exchange, inter-dealer quotation system, or other market in which shares of Common Stock are traded, shall be effective unless and until such stockholder approval has been obtained in compliance with such rule or law; and provided, further, that no such amendment shall materially adversely affect the rights of a Grantee in any Award previously granted under the Plan without the Grantee’s written consent.

17. Effective Date . The Plan shall be effective as of the date of its adoption by the Board (the “Effective Date”), subject to the approval thereof by the stockholders of KapStone entitled to vote thereon within 12 months of such date. In the event that such stockholder approval is not obtained within such time period, the Plan and any Awards granted under the Plan on or prior to the expiration of such 12 month period shall be void and of no further force and effect.

18. Termination of Plan . Unless terminated earlier by the Board in accordance with Section 16 above, the Plan shall terminate on, and no further Awards may be granted after, the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date.

19. Severability . In the event that any one or more provisions of the Plan or an Award Agreement, or any action taken pursuant to the Plan or an Award Agreement, should, for any reason, be unenforceable or invalid in any respect under the laws of the United States, any state of the United States or any other jurisdiction, such unenforceability or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of the Plan or Award Agreement, but in such particular jurisdiction and instance the Plan and/or Award Agreement, as applicable, shall be construed as if such unenforceable or invalid provision had not been contained therein or if the action in question had not been taken thereunder.

20. Definitions .

(a) Affiliate. The term “Affiliate” means any entity, whether or not incorporated, that directly or through one or more intermediaries is controlled by KapStone.

(b) Cause . The term “Cause” when used herein in conjunction with termination of employment (or other service relationship) means (i) if the Grantee is a party to an employment or similar agreement with the Company which

defines “cause” (or a similar term), the meaning set forth in such agreement (other than death or disability), or (ii) otherwise, termination by the Company of the employment (or other service relationship) of the Grantee by reason of the Grantee’s (1) intentional failure to perform reasonably assigned duties, (2) dishonesty or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties, (3) involvement in a transaction which is materially adverse to the Company, (4) breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit, (5) willful violation of any law, rule, regulation or court order (other than misdemeanor traffic violations and misdemeanors not involving misuse or misappropriation of money or property), (6) commission of an act of fraud or intentional misappropriation or conversion of any asset or opportunity of the Company, or (7) material breach of any provision of the Plan, the Grantee’s Award Agreement or any other written agreement between the Grantee and the Company, in each case as determined in good faith by the Board, whose determination shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties.

(c) Disability . Except as otherwise specified in the applicable Award Agreement or in the Grantee’s Employment Agreement with the Company, the Grantee shall be deemed to have a “Disability” if the Grantee is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determined physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, as reasonably determined by the Board in good faith and in its discretion.

(d) Fair Market Value . As used herein, the term “Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock as of a specified date for the purposes of the Plan shall mean the value of a share of Common Stock determined consistent with the requirements of Sections 422 and 409A of the Code as follows: the arithmetic mean of the high and low sales prices of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant on the principal securities exchange (including the Nasdaq National Market) on which such shares are traded on the relevant date for which Fair Market Value is being determined, or if the shares are not traded on a securities exchange, Fair Market Value shall be deemed to be the average of the high bid and low asked prices of the Common Stock on the date of grant in the over-the-counter market on which such shares are traded on the relevant date for which Fair Market Value is being determined. If the shares are not publicly traded, Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock (including, in the case of any repurchase of shares, any distributions with respect thereto which would be repurchased with the shares) shall be determined in good faith by the Board or the Committee. In no case shall Fair Market Value be determined with regard to restrictions other than restrictions which, by their terms, will never lapse.

(e) Family Member of the Grantee. As used herein, “Family Member of the Grantee” means the Grantee’s child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive relationships, any person sharing the Grantee’s household (other than a tenant or employee), a trust in which these persons have more than 50% of the beneficial interest, a foundation in which these persons (or the Grantee) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the Grantee) own more than 50% of the voting interests.

(f) Retirement. As used herein, “Retirement” means the termination of employment of a Grantee over the age of 64.

Exhibit 10.6

Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Agreement

This Amendment dated November 28, 2012 to the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into on or about May 27, 2010 (“RSU Agreement”) between KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (the “Company”) and Andrea Tarbox (‘Grantee”).

WHEREAS, on May 27, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Compensation Committee”) granted long term incentive awards to certain employees in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock options;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s action, Grantee was awarded 12,764 RSUs having a vesting date of May 27, 2013;

WHEREAS, on November 20, 2012, the Compensation Committee adopted a resolution directing that the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreements pertaining to the RSUs awarded on May 27, 2010 be amended to reflect an accelerated vesting date of November 28, 2012 except for Matt Kaplan and those grantees who will have attained the age of 65 years on or prior to November 28, 2012; and

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee further resolved that the RSU Agreement be amended to provide that in the event that Grantee is not employed by the Company on May 27, 2013 (other than by reason of death or disability), Grantee shall pay the Company an amount equal to the value of the RSUs plus any special dividends arising out of her ownership of the Company’s common stock converted from such RSUs.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Company and Grantee agree to amend the RSU Agreement as follows:

1. Grantee and the Company agree to amend the vesting date for the RSUs from May 27, 2013 to November 28, 2012.

2. Grantee agrees that in the event she is not employed by the Company on May 27, 2013 (except by reason of her death or disability), she will promptly pay the Company (i) an amount equal to the product of 12,764 shares of common stock times the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last day of her employment with the Company, (ii) plus $25,528 (representing the $2.00 special dividend paid on 12,764 shares of the Company’s common stock).

Signature page follows

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement to be executed as of the date first set forth above.

/S/ Andrea K. Tarbox
Andrea K. Tarbox


KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

By:	/S/ Roger W. Stone
	Roger W. Stone
	Chairman and CEO

Signature page to Amendment dated November 28, 2012 to Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement entered into on or about May 27, 2010 between Andrea Tarbox and KapStone Paper and Packaging Agreement

Exhibit 14.0

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS

Introduction

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively “KapStone” or the “Company”) have always endeavored to conduct business in a manner conforming to the highest ethical and business standards. The Company’s reputation for unquestionable integrity is its most valuable asset in its relationships with its employees and agents (collectively “employee(s)”), its customers, its stockholders and the communities in which its operations are located.

This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) covers a wide range of business practices and procedures and applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. It does not cover every issue that may arise, but it sets out basic principles to guide directors, officers and employees of the Company to act in an ethical and legal manner. All of our directors, officers and employees must conduct themselves accordingly and seek to avoid even the appearance of improper behavior. It is essential and a condition of employment that all employees and representatives conform to these principles as they perform their activities on behalf of KapStone.

Since it is not practicable to specify specific requirements for business conduct and ethics for application in every possible situation, an understanding of the philosophy behind these standards is essential. The philosophy of the Company — upon which its ethical standards are based — is outlined below.

· We work hard and treat others with respect.

· We earn an honest profit by providing the right products and services to our customers.

· We act responsibly and in a manner that reflects favorably on the Company.

· We observe applicable laws and regulations.

· We require honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest, on the part of ourselves and others.

· We are committed to full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations in all reports and other documents filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in all other public releases of information regarding the Company’s finances and operations.

If a law conflicts with a policy in this Code, you must comply with the law; however, if a local custom or policy conflicts with this Code, you must comply with the

Code. If you have any questions about these conflicts, you should ask your supervisor how to handle the situation.

This Code will be strictly enforced. All managers and supervisors are required to enforce this policy and are not permitted to sanction or condone violations. There will be serious adverse consequences for non-adherence to the Code, which may include removal from a position as director or officer, and dismissal as an employee of the Company. If you are in a situation which you believe may violate or lead to a violation of this Code, you should follow the procedures described in Sections 15, 16 and 17 of this Code.

The Company does not tolerate retribution against persons who, in good faith, report suspected violations of law. Persons subject to this Code who retaliate against others who report suspected crimes or wrongs will themselves be subject to immediate discipline.

1. Compliance with Laws

It is the policy of KapStone to comply fully with all valid laws and regulations that govern its operations in the various communities and states in which it operates and to conduct its affairs in keeping with the highest moral, legal, and ethical standards.

There is an obligation, both corporate and individual, to fulfill the intent of the above statement. It is not expected that every employee will have full knowledge of the laws affecting his or her responsibilities. However, KapStone does expect that every employee with significant responsibilities will have a general knowledge of prohibited activities involved in his or her work and will seek guidance on any matter on which there is a question, either directly through his or her supervisor or if necessary, from KapStone’s Chairman, Roger Stone.

2. Business Ethics

The law is a base, and ethical business conduct should normally exist at a level above the minimum required by law. This includes the obligation to avoid any actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships. The honesty and integrity of the Company’s business conduct must not be compromised. The Company will not condone ethical violations for the sake of personal gain, personal advantage, expediency or perceived business advantage.

3. KapStone and Its Employees

Employees are KapStone’s greatest asset, and it is a KapStone policy to treat them fairly in all matters. KapStone is committed to equal opportunity in all aspects of employment and to full compliance with all federal, state and local laws applicable to hiring and promoting people.

With this in mind, it is the intent of KapStone to:

· Choose and promote its employees on the basis of their ability to perform the work for which they are hired. KapStone strictly prohibits discrimination based on any legally protected status, including race, color, gender, religion, national origin, disability, veteran status and age.

· Offer employees a safe, healthful, and clean environment in which to work. Each employee has responsibility for maintaining a safe and healthy workplace for all employees by following safety and health rules and practices and reporting accidents, injuries and unsafe conditions. Violence and threatening behavior are not permitted. Employees should report to work in condition to perform their duties, free from the influence of illegal drugs or alcohol. The use of illegal drugs in the workplace will not be tolerated.

· Pay employees fairly in relationship to their contributions to KapStone efforts, within the boundaries of current standards, profitability and market conditions.

4. Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation

KapStone is firmly committed to providing equal opportunity in all aspects of employment and will not tolerate discrimination, harassment or retaliation. The Company’s policy against discrimination applies to any legally protected status, including race, color, gender, religion, national origin, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation and age.

KapStone also prohibits any individual from engaging in any act or any form of harassment of any other individual on the basis of any legally protected status, including race, color, gender, religion, national origin, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or age. This prohibition covers verbal, as well as physical harassment. Included within this prohibition are unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, where: (a) there is an attempt made to make submission to such conduct a term or condition of an individual’s employment; (b) the submission or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment related decision; and (c) such conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.

KapStone prohibits discrimination against any person who provides information to a federal regulatory or law enforcement agency, a member of Congress or any committee of Congress or to a supervisor concerning conduct which the employee reasonably believes constitutes a violation of securities laws or any provision of federal law relating to fraud against stockholders. No one may take any action harmful to any person for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any federal offense.

No director, officer or employee may retaliate against an individual for bringing a complaint of discrimination or harassment or for participating in an investigation or proceeding involving a complaint of discrimination or harassment.

KapStone requires continuous management attention at all levels to assure compliance with the spirit and letter of this policy.

5. Competition and Fair Dealing

KapStone seeks to outperform its competition fairly and honestly. The Company seeks competitive advantages through superior performance, never through unethical or illegal business practices. Stealing proprietary information, possessing trade secret information that was obtained without the owner’s consent or inducing such disclosures by past or present employees of other companies is prohibited. Each employee should endeavor to respect the rights of and to deal fairly with the Company’s customers, suppliers, competitors and employees. No employee should take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts or any other intentional act or practice.

In its relationships with its competitors, KapStone and its employees will fully understand and strictly adhere to the requirements of the antitrust laws. These laws, which, in the U.S., include the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, the Robinson-Patman Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act, seek to advance and maintain the free enterprise system and take precedence over any business objective of KapStone, notwithstanding any resulting increases in income or profits. Such acts as price fixing, restrictive agreements, boycotts, tie-in arrangements exclusive of reciprocal dealings, monopolizing, price inducements, and discriminatory allowances are or may be illegal. All violations of the antitrust laws must be scrupulously avoided by all employees. KapStone will not condone any actions which an employee knew or should have known would violate the antitrust laws or any other valid law or regulation.

The purpose of business entertainment and gifts in a commercial setting is to create goodwill and sound working relationships, not to gain unfair advantage with customers or suppliers. Gifts or bribes for the purpose of influencing the buying decisions of employees of customers or potential customers or to any person in a position to influence a buying decision are clearly improper and prohibited.

6. Insider Trading

Directors, officers and employees who have access to material confidential information are not permitted to use or share that information for securities trading purposes or for any other purpose except the conduct of the Company’s business and in strict conformity with all applicable laws and SEC regulations. All non-public information about the Company should be considered confidential information. To use non-public information for personal financial benefit or to “tip” others who might make an investment decision on the basis of this information is not only unethical but also

illegal. Trading in the securities of other companies with which the Company has a relationship while in possession of material nonpublic information is also prohibited.

7. Accounting, Auditing and Internal Control Matters; Public Disclosure Obligations

KapStone’s requirement that directors, officers and employees follow the highest ethical standards applies directly to all actions which involve business accounting, financial reporting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters and public disclosure obligations.

The Company requires honest and accurate recording and reporting of information in order to make responsible business decisions. All of the Company’s books, records, accounts and financial statements must be maintained in reasonable detail, must appropriately reflect the Company’s transactions and must conform to applicable legal requirements, generally accepted accounting principles and the Company’s system of internal controls. No employee is ever authorized to knowingly enter or maintain false or misleading information in corporate books, records or reports. It is prohibited under federal law and Company policy to fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead the Company’s independent public accountants for the purpose of rendering the Company’s financial statements materially misleading. Records should always be retained or destroyed according to the Company’s record retention policies.

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure is required in all reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the SEC and in any other public communications regarding the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

All officers, directors and employees are required to report, or cause to be reported, information, and should assist in any investigation by any regulatory or law enforcement agency, elected officials or others responsible for such matters, concerning matters that the officer, director or employee reasonably believes could constitute matters described in:

· Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud or securities fraud, breach of any rule or regulation promulgated by the SEC or any federal rules relating to fraud against stockholders;

· Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including questionable accounting, internal controls and auditing matters;

· Item 406 of Regulation S-K, including disclosures in SEC reports and other public disclosures that are not full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable; and

· Applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards, including conflicts of interest and violations of laws, rules, or regulations applicable to the Company.

Accounting procedures and controls are prescribed by Company policies. Within these policies, the officers of the Company have the primary responsibility for establishing and monitoring adequate systems of internal accounting and controls, and all employees must adhere to these controls. The Company’s auditors monitor and document compliance with these internal controls.

The Audit Committee of the Company has adopted special procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. These procedures are set out in Sections 16 and 17 of this Code.

8. Confidentiality

Employees must maintain the confidentiality of the information entrusted to them by the Company or its customers, except when disclosure is authorized by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the President or required by law. Confidential information includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors or harmful to the Company or its customers, if disclosed. It also includes information that suppliers and customers have entrusted to us. The obligation to preserve confidential information continues even after employment ends.

9. Protection and Proper Use of Company Assets

All directors, officers and employees should endeavor to protect the Company’s assets and ensure their efficient use. Theft, carelessness and waste have a direct impact on the Company’s profitability. Any suspected incident of fraud or theft should be immediately reported for investigation.

Many employees regularly use business expense accounts, which must be documented and recorded accurately and in accordance with the Company’s policies. If you are not sure whether a certain expense is legitimate, ask your supervisor or your controller.

The obligation to protect the Company’s assets includes the Company’s proprietary information. Proprietary information includes intellectual property such as trade secrets, patents, trademarks and copyrights, as well as business, marketing, product development and service plans, records, salary information and any unpublished financial data and reports. Unauthorized use or distribution of this information would violate Company policy. It could also be illegal and result in civil or even criminal penalties.

10. Payments to Government Personnel

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits giving anything of value, directly or indirectly, to officials of foreign governments or foreign political candidates in

order to obtain or retain business. It is strictly prohibited to make illegal payments to government officials of any country. In addition, the U.S. government has a number of laws and regulations regarding business gratuities which may be accepted by U.S. government personnel. The promise, offer or delivery to an official or employee of the U.S. government of a gift, favor or other gratuity in violation of these rules would not only violate Company policy but could also be a criminal offense. State and local governments, as well as foreign governments, may have similar rules.

Payments, regardless of amount, to any government employee, or gifts or services of substantial value or lavish entertainment, regardless of motive, are prohibited. Relationships with public employees shall be so conducted that neither the official’s nor KapStone’s integrity would be compromised if the full details of the relationship became a matter of public knowledge. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer (the “Compliance Officer” for purposes of this Code) can provide guidance to you in this area.

11. Political Contributions

Virtually every state either limits or prohibits the making of political contributions by a corporation to a state or local candidate or political party. KapStone’s policy is to make no financial contributions to a political party or to a candidate running for any elective office, except as permitted by law. This applies to all political parties or candidates. All political contributions, including those requested by customers or suppliers, must be approved by both the Compliance Officer and the General Counsel.

12. KapStone and the Community

KapStone shall conduct its business in a manner that is socially and ethically responsible. In addition to operating and managing its business, it shall seek to reasonably protect the quality of the environment and endeavor to conserve energy and other valuable resources.

Each of the KapStone’s facilities is expected to make every effort to be an integral part of the community in which it operates, and to participate in its activities as a concerned and responsible citizen. Like individual citizens, the Company benefits from and supports such activities as health, welfare, character building, education, and culture. KapStone recognizes that employee participation in cultural, social, or volunteer organizations can be public service of a higher order, and all KapStone employees are encouraged to participate during their non-working hours in public matters of their individual choice.

13. Conflicts of Interest

It has always been and continues to be KapStone’s intent that its employees maintain the highest standards of loyalty in their conduct of the Company’s affairs. Directors, officers and employees owe a duty to the Company to advance the Company’s legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises. In essence, KapStone’s employees shall deal with suppliers, customers, and other persons doing business or seeking to do business with the Company in a manner that eliminates considerations of

personal advantage. Because they hold positions of trust in the Company, a director, an officer, or any other employee may not make a profit from the Company because of his or her official position. They are also prohibited from engaging in a competing business.

Any direct or indirect conflict of interest between the Company and any director, officer or employee is prohibited unless otherwise consented to by the Company. The Company believes that it is in its best interests and is consistent with the obligations of directors, officers and employees to the Company to establish a policy that all business decisions will reflect independent judgment and discretion, uninfluenced by any considerations other than those honestly believed to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Any decision will be deemed to be in conflict with the interests of the Company if, in the course of affiliation with the Company, the judgment and discretion of a director, officer or employee is or may be influenced by considerations of personal gain or benefit, or gain or benefit to a third party, whether or not affiliated with the director, officer or employee. The divided loyalty that is present when a director, officer or employee has a conflict of interest could potentially lead to serious problems for the Company and could be grounds for disciplinary action or termination by the Company.

It is not possible to describe every situation or occurrence that could lead to a conflict of interest between a director, officer or employee and the Company. The following events are intended to describe, by way of example, situations that could occur that could lead to a conflict of interest with the Company:

· Relationships with Customer or Competitors: Stock ownership and other financial interests or participation in any customer, supplier or competitor of the Company must be reported to the Compliance Officer.

· Indirect Interests and Relationships: A conflict of interest can arise because of the business activities of an affiliate of a director, officer or employee. The term affiliate includes close family members and family members who live in the same household as a director, officer or employee. A director, officer or employee has a potential conflict of interest whenever his or her affiliate has a significant interest in a transaction or a significant relationship with any customer, supplier or competitor of the Company. The director, officer or employee should not make or influence any decision which could directly or indirectly benefit his or her affiliate and, in order to protect the director, officer or employee and the Company from the appearance of a conflict of interest, all relationships of this nature must be reported to the Compliance Officer.

· Gifts and Entertainment: No gifts or entertainment at non-business-related functions may be accepted other than noncash gifts used for promotional purposes or entertainment having a value of less than $100 per year; however, values in excess of $100 per year may be approved by an employee’s supervisor. Gifts of entertainment may only be accepted when the employee is to be accompanied by the vendor at the entertainment event. Participation

in business-related functions is permitted, including the acceptance of entertainment or meals. However, each employee should exercise care to ensure that such functions are necessary and related to the conduct of business on behalf of the Company. If in doubt, the Compliance Officer should be consulted.

· Loans: An employee will not accept loans from any person having or seeking business with the Company (other than loans from banks or financial institutions at prevailing market rates and terms).

· Outside Business Activities: As a general rule, the Company does not allow its employees to participate or engage in business activities outside of their employment with the Company. As a general rule, participation on a part-time or other basis in any outside business or employment will be a conflict of interest if the director, officer or employee’s participation in that business could interfere with his or her ability to devote proper time and attention to his or her employment with the Company.

· Non-business Activities: Participation in the activities of a trade association, professional society, charitable institution or governmental institution, on a non-compensated basis, or holding a part-time public office (with or without compensation) will not generally create a conflict of interest in violation of this Code. However, if any director, officer or employee is unsure of his or her particular situation, the Compliance Officer should be consulted.

· Personal Use of Company Property and Company Information: It is against Company policy for any director, officer or employee to use or divert any Company property, including services of other employees, for his or her own advantage or benefit, or to use Company letterhead when writing personal correspondence.

· Related Party Business Dealing. If there is any business relationship or proposed business transaction that the Company might have with any company in which a director, officer or employee, or a related party of any such person, has a direct or indirect interest, and from which such person might derive a benefit, or at which a related party is employed, and if such a relationship or transaction might give rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest, then the Compliance Officer should be consulted.

14. Company Opportunity

Directors and employees are prohibited from taking for themselves personally opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information, or position without the consent of the Board of Directors. No director or employee may use corporate property, information, or position for improper personal gain. Directors and employees have a duty to the Company to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.

15. Waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Any waiver of this Code for executive officers or directors may be made only by the Board of Directors and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or NYSE rules.

16. Personal Responsibility

It is essential that the Company ensures prompt and consistent action against violations of this Code. However, in some situations it is difficult to know right from wrong. Since directors, officers and employees cannot anticipate every situation that will arise, it is important to have guidelines on how to approach a new question or problem. These are the steps to keep in mind:

· Make sure you have all the facts. In order to reach the right solutions, we must be as fully informed as possible.

· Ask yourself: What specifically am I being asked to do? Does it seem unethical or improper? This will enable you to focus on the specific question you are faced with, and the alternatives you have. Use your judgment and common sense; if something seems unethical or improper, it probably is.

· Clarify your responsibility and role. In most situations, there is shared responsibility. Are your colleagues informed? It may help to get others involved and discuss the problem.

· Discuss the problem with your supervisor. This is the basic guidance for all situations. In many cases, your supervisor will be more knowledgeable about the question, and will appreciate being brought into the decision-making process. Remember that it is your supervisor’s responsibility to help solve problems.

· Seek help from Company resources. If you believe that it is not appropriate to discuss an issue with your supervisor, or you do not feel comfortable approaching your supervisor with your question, discuss it locally with the Compliance Officer.

· You may report ethical violations in confidence and without fear of retaliation. If your situation requires that your identity be kept secret, your anonymity will be protected. The Company does not permit retaliation of any kind against employees for good faith reports of ethical violations.

· Always ask first, act later: If you are unsure of what to do in any situation, seek guidance before you act .

17. Reporting/Investigation Procedures

Any director, officer or employee who reasonably believes that there has been a material violation of this Code should report it immediately to the Compliance Officer or Roger Stone, Chairman. If the possible violation relates to questionable accounting,

auditing, internal control or other matters described in Section 7 of this Code, the employee may submit an anonymous, confidential complaint as discussed in Section 17. The Chairman of the Audit Committee shall in any event be promptly advised of any allegation of a material violation of Section 7 of this Code. Upon receipt of a complaint, the Company or Audit Committee or other designee shall promptly investigate the matter.

Providing your name allows the Company to contact you if necessary during any investigation. The Company will maintain in confidence the identity of those individuals who provide their names when reporting to the fullest extent possible consistent with the need to investigate. Absolute confidentiality of any complaint under this Code, however, cannot be guaranteed because the very fact of conducting an investigation may lead employees or other persons to reach conclusions of their own. Anyone involved in an investigation under these procedures, whether as witnesses, participants in the performance of the investigation or otherwise, will be informed of their obligation to maintain confidentiality and may be asked to sign an acknowledgment of this obligation.

KapStone will not retaliate against any officer, director or employee who reports, causes to be reported, testifies, participates in or otherwise assists in any proceeding reported or about to be reported regarding any matter covered under this Code.

The Compliance Officer will send summaries of conversations, and will forward copies of written communications and transcripts of voice mail messages, containing reports to the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chairman of the Audit Committee, as appropriate under the circumstances. The Compliance Officer will provide periodic reports to both Chairmen. The Compliance Officer will retain copies of all complaints, investigative reports, summaries of reports and other records relating to complaints in accordance with the Company’s records retention policy.

18. Procedures for Submitting Confidential, Anonymous Complaints Regarding Accounting, Auditing or Internal Control Matters

As an alternative to the procedures described in Section 16, any employee who reasonably believes that there has been a material violation of this Code relating to questionable accounting, auditing, internal control or other matters described in Section 7 of this Code may submit confidential, anonymous complaints in writing to the person listed below. Complaints must provide sufficient information so that a reasonable investigation can be conducted and may be made directly to:

S. Jay Stewart, Chair of the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors;

Telephone No.: (312) 475-9883

Fax No.: (312) 475-9884

Email Address: sjaystewart@aol.com

or such other individuals who are designated from time to time by the Board of Directors of KapStone.

The Company shall maintain a record of all complaints submitted under this Code alleging a violation accounting, auditing or internal control matters.

19. Consequences

If an investigation leads to a conclusion that a material violation of the Code has occurred, the Company will take appropriate corrective action, which may include removal from a position as director or officer and dismissal as an employee of the Company. Among other things, directors, officers and employees of the Company may be disciplined for:

· Committing, authorizing, or directing an illegal act.

· Failing to exercise proper compliance oversight or tolerating illegal conduct, if acting as a supervisor of another employee of the Company.

· Failing to report illegal business conduct of which he or she directly knows or observes.

· Discouraging another director, officer, or employee from reporting a violation of law or of this Code.

· Improperly disclosing the identity of a person who anonymously reports a violation of this Code.

· Retaliating or condoning retaliation against any director, officer, or employee of the Company who reports such a violation.

As examples, the following are not valid excuses for failing to comply with the law and/or this Code and, as such, will not avoid disciplinary measures under this Code:

· “A supervisor demanded that I do the illegal, unethical or improper act.”

· “I thought the conduct was standard practice in our business.”

· “It was a business necessity because it would have cost more to act properly.”

· “I misinterpreted the law or this code and did not seek the advice of my supervisor.”

The Company recognizes the potentially serious impact of a false accusation. Employees are expected as part of the ethical standards required by this Code to act responsibly in making complaints. Making a complaint without a good faith basis is itself an ethical violation. Any employee who makes a complaint in bad faith will be subject to appropriate corrective action, up to and including dismissal.

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 21.1

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Consolidated Subsidiaries	Organized Under Laws of

KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation	Delaware	100	%
KapStone Charleston Kraft, LLC	Delaware	100	%
KapStone Container Corporation	Georgia	100	%
KapStone Europe SPRL	Belgium	100	%
KapStone Asia Limited	Hong Kong	100	%

The mill located in Cowpens, South Carolina is owned by KapStone Container Corporation and does business as KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation.

Non-Consolidated Subsidiaries

None

On October 31, 2011, KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation acquired U.S. Corrugated Acquisition Inc. and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Corrugated, Inc., which was renamed KapStone Acquisition Inc. and KapStone Container Corporation, respectively. As part of an internal reorganization, KapStone Acquisition Inc. and all of U.S. Corrugated Inc.'s former subsidiaries were merged (directly or indirectly) into KapStone Container Corporation, with KapStone Container Corporation surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation and the owner of all of the USC entities' assets.

QuickLinks

Exhibit 21.1

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124601) of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141916) pertaining to the 2006 Incentive Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-167181) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-163667) pertaining to the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated March 4, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year-ended December 31, 2012.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 4, 2013

QuickLinks

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Roger W. Stone, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.: designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.: designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.: evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.: disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.: all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.: any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 4, 2013

QuickLinks

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Andrea K. Tarbox, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation;

2.

3.

4.

a.: designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.: designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.: evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.: disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

a.: all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.: any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 4, 2013

QuickLinks

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Roger W. Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

(1): The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the annual period ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
(2): The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

Dated: March 4, 2013


		By:		/s/ ROGER W. STONE Roger W. Stone Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

QuickLinks

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Andrea K. Tarbox, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

(1): The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the annual period ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
(2): The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

Dated: March 4, 2013


		By:		/s/ ANDREA K. TARBOX Andrea K. Tarbox Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

QuickLinks

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002