UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2015

or

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File Number: 001-33706

URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 98-0399476
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
   
1111 West Hastings Street, Suite 320, Vancouver, B.C. V6E 2J3
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(604) 682-9775
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal
year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]     No [   ] 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X]     No [   ] 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

[   ] Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer
   
[   ] Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) [   ]  Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [  ]     No [X]  


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
91,993,916 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 9, 2015.

2


URANIUM ENERGY CORP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION 4
    Item 1. Financial Statements 4
    Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 23
    Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 32
    Item 4. Controls and Procedures 32
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION 33
    Item 1. Legal Proceedings 33
    Item 1A. Risk Factors 34
    Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 42
    Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 43
    Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 43
    Item 5. Other Information 43
    Item 6. Exhibits 43
SIGNATURES 44

3


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.     Financial Statements

4


 

 

URANIUM ENERGY CORP.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

5



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
 

  Notes   January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
               
CURRENT ASSETS              
   Cash and cash equivalents                   $  4,362,544   $  8,839,892  
   Available-for-sale securities     3,139     4,811  
   Accounts and interest receivable     14,659     15,061  
   Inventories 3   2,101,666     1,896,475  
   Prepaid expenses and deposits     583,026     726,984  
   Current portion of deferred financing costs     83,811     83,811  
      7,148,845     11,567,034  
               
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS     125,716     167,621  
MINERAL RIGHTS AND PROPERTIES 4   39,012,624     39,488,699  
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 5   7,531,864     8,005,337  
RECLAMATION DEPOSITS 6   1,706,025     5,678,629  
                    $  55,525,074   $  64,907,320  
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES              
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                   $  1,132,672   $  2,088,284  
   Due to related parties 7   4,917     11,234  
   Current portion of asset retirement obligations 9   340,827     198,816  
      1,478,416     2,298,334  
               
DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES     687,847     711,477  
LONG-TERM DEBT 8   19,321,639     18,705,137  
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS 9   3,710,374     3,768,773  
      25,198,276     25,483,721  
               
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY              
   Capital stock 
             Common stock $0.001 par value: 750,000,000 shares 
             authorized, 91,891,620 shares issued and outstanding 
             (July 31, 2014 - 90,966,558)
10   91,895     90,972  
   Additional paid-in capital     211,514,027     208,008,312  
   Accumulated deficit     (181,263,913)     (168,662,146)  
   Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (15,211)     (13,539)  
      30,326,798     39,423,599  
                    $  55,525,074   $  64,907,320  
               
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 14            

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

6



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
 

      Three Months Ended January 31,     Six Months Ended January 31,  
  Notes   2015     2014     2015     2014  
                           
SALES   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
                           
COSTS AND EXPENSES                          
   Cost of sales     -     -     -     -  
   Inventory write-down     -     -     -     392,149  
   Mineral property expenditures 4   1,254,268     2,584,020     3,514,399     4,172,163  
   General and administrative 7, 10   3,366,449     3,082,480     6,544,037     5,388,269  
   Depreciation, amortization and accretion 4, 5, 9   489,484     647,881     1,066,726     1,188,960  
   Impairment loss on mineral property     -     -     -     28,891  
      5,110,201     6,314,381     11,125,162     11,170,432  
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS     (5,110,201)     (6,314,381)     (11,125,162)     (11,170,432)  
                           
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)                          
   Interest income     3,286     8,004     8,006     13,330  
   Interest and finance costs 8   (767,854)     (832,088) (1,505,343)     (1,629,535)  
   Loss on disposition of assets     (2,898)     (2,553)   (2,898)     (2,553)
   Loss on fair value of variable share forward contract     -     (36,839)     -     (268,601)  
   Loss on settlement of asset retirement obligations     -     (1,037)     -     (1,037)  
      (767,466)     (864,513)     (1,500,235)     (1,888,396)  
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES     (5,877,667)     (7,178,894)     (12,625,397)     (13,058,828)  
                           
DEFERRED INCOME TAX BENEFIT     2,127     -     23,630     -  
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD     (5,875,540)     (7,178,894)     (12,601,767)     (13,058,828)  
                           
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF INCOME TAXES     (1,448)     (4,026)     (1,672)     (6,327)  
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $  (5,876,988)   $  (7,182,920)   $  (12,603,439)   $  (13,065,155)  
                           
NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED 11 $  (0.06)   $  (0.08)   $  (0.14)   $  (0.15)  
                           
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED 91,746,410 89,701,157 91,513,626 88,058,149

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

7



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 

      Six Months Ended January 31,  
  Notes   2015     2014  
CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY:              
               
OPERATING ACTIVITIES              
Net loss for the period     $ (12,601,767) $  (13,058,828)  
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities              
     Stock-based compensation 10   3,310,666     752,136  
     Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion     1,725,130     2,269,063  
     Impairment loss on mineral property     -     28,891  
     Loss on disposition of assets     2,898     2,553  
     Loss on fair value of variable share forward contract     -     268,601  
     Loss on settlement of asset retirement obligations     -     1,037  
     Deferred income tax benefit     (23,630)     -  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities              
     Accounts and interest receivable     402     (4,602)  
     Inventories     (162,035)     (605,266)  
     Prepaid expenses and deposits     (91,660)     (109,086)  
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (955,612)     (804,376)  
Settlement of asset retirement obligations     -     (13,183)  
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES     (8,795,608)     (11,273,060)  
               
FINANCING ACTIVITIES              
     Shares issuance for cash, net of issuance costs 10   431,590     6,633,077  
     Debt financing costs     -     (357,497)  
     Due to related parties 7   (6,317)     (960)  
NET CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES     425,273     6,274,620  
               
INVESTING ACTIVITIES              
     Investment in mineral rights and properties 4   (73,624)     (111,800)  
     Purchase of property, plant and equipment     (5,993)     (27,369)  
     Proceeds from disposition of assets     -     600  
     Cash proceeds from the release of reclamation deposits 6   5,663,158     -  
     Payment of collateral for surety bonds 6   (1,690,208)     -  
     Increase in reclamation deposits     (346)     (852)  
NET CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES     3,892,987     (139,421)  
               
NET CASH FLOWS     (4,477,348)     (5,137,861)  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD     8,839,892     14,171,807  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD     $ 4,362,544   $  9,033,946  
               
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION 13            

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

8



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)

                            Accumulated        
                            Other        
    Common Stock     Additional Paid-     Accumulated     Comprehensive     Stockholders'  
    Shares     Amount     in Capital     Deficit     Loss     Equity  
Balance, July 31, 2014   90,966,558   $  90,972   $  208,008,312   $ (168,662,146)   $  (13,539) $  39,423,599  
Common stock                                    
       Issued for equity financing, net of issuance costs   280,045     280     175,143     -     -     175,423  
       Issued for exercise of stock options   80,948     81     20,468     -     -     20,549  
Stock-based compensation                                    
       Common stock issued for consulting services   564,069     562     876,863     -     -     877,425  
       Options issued for consulting services   -     -     374,435     -     -     374,435  
       Options issued for management fees   -     -     1,161,279     -     -     1,161,279  
       Options issued for employee benefits   -     -     897,527     -     -     897,527  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (12,601,767)     -     (12,601,767)  
Other comprehensive loss   -     -     -     -     (1,672)     (1,672)  
Balance, January 31, 2015   91,891,620   $  91,895   $  211,514,027   $ (181,263,913)   $  (15,211)   $  30,326,798  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

9



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

NOTE 1: NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN

Uranium Energy Corp. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 16, 2003. Uranium Energy Corp. and its subsidiary companies and a controlled partnership (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in uranium mining and related activities, including exploration, pre-extraction, extraction and processing of uranium concentrates, on projects located in the United States and Paraguay.

Although planned principal operations have commenced from which significant revenues from sales of uranium concentrates were realized for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2013 (“Fiscal 2013”) and 2012 (“Fiscal 2012”), the Company has yet to achieve profitability and has had a history of operating losses and significant negative cash flow since inception. No revenue from uranium sales was realized for the six months ended January 31, 2015 and the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014 (“Fiscal 2014”). Historically, the Company has been reliant primarily on equity financings from the sale of its common stock and debt financing in order to fund its operations, and this reliance is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. During Fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company also relied on cash flows generated from its mining activities.

At January 31, 2015, the Company had working capital of $5.7 million including cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain adequate additional financing which the Company has successfully secured since its inception, including those from asset divestitures. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in securing any form of additional financing including further asset divestitures and accordingly, there is substantial doubt as to whether the Company’s existing cash resources and working capital are sufficient to enable the Company to continue its operations for the next twelve months. The continued operations of the Company, including the recoverability of the carrying values of its assets, are dependent ultimately on the Company’s ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow from its operations.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary in the event the Company can no longer continue as a going concern.

NOTE 2: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required under U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature and considered necessary for a fair presentation have been made. Operating results for the six months ended January 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2015.

Exploration Stage

The Company has established the existence of mineralized materials for certain uranium projects, including the Palangana Mine. The Company has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for any of its uranium projects, including the Palangana Mine. Furthermore, the Company has no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of its uranium projects for which the Company plans on utilizing in-situ recovery (“ISR”) mining, such as the Palangana Mine. As a result, and despite the fact that the Company commenced extraction of mineralized materials at the Palangana Mine in November 2010, the Company remains in the Exploration Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7, and will continue to remain in the Exploration Stage until such time proven or probable reserves have been established.

10



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

Since the Company commenced extraction of mineralized materials at the Palangana Mine without having established proven or probable reserves, any mineralized materials established or extracted from the Palangana Mine should not in any way be associated with having established or produced from proven or probable reserves.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, expenditures relating to the acquisition of mineral rights are initially capitalized as incurred while exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time the Company exits the Exploration Stage by establishing proven or probable reserves. Expenditures relating to exploration activities such as drill programs to establish mineralized materials are expensed as incurred. Expenditures relating to pre-extraction activities such as the construction of mine wellfields, ion exchange facilities and disposal wells are expensed as incurred until such time proven or probable reserves are established for that project, after which expenditures relating to mine development activities for that particular project are capitalized as incurred.

Companies in the Production Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7, having established proven and probable reserves and exited the Exploration Stage, typically capitalize expenditures relating to ongoing development activities, with corresponding depletion calculated over proven and probable reserves using the units-of-production method and allocated to future reporting periods to inventory and, as that inventory is sold, to cost of goods sold. The Company is in the Exploration Stage which has resulted in the Company reporting larger losses than if it had been in the Production Stage due to the expensing, instead of capitalization, of expenditures relating to ongoing mill and mine development activities. Additionally, there would be no corresponding amortization allocated to future reporting periods of the Company since those costs would have been expensed previously, resulting in both lower inventory costs and cost of goods sold and results of operations with higher gross profits and lower losses than if the Company had been in the Production Stage. Any capitalized costs, such as expenditures relating to the acquisition of mineral rights, are depleted over the estimated extraction life using the straight-line method. As a result, the Company’s consolidated financial statements may not be directly comparable to the financial statements of companies in the Production Stage.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”), which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted.

NOTE 3: INVENTORIES

In November 2010, the Company commenced uranium extraction at its Palangana Mine and processing of uranium concentrates at its Hobson Processing Facility. The Company’s inventories consisted of the following:

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
Supplies $  24,652   $  26,631  
Work-in-progress   55,487     63,257  
Finished goods - uranium concentrates   2,021,527     1,806,587  
  $  2,101,666   $  1,896,475  

At January 31, 2015, the total non-cash component of inventory was $411,955 (July 31, 2014: $368,799). For the six months ended January 31, 2015, no inventory write-down to net realizable value was recorded (six months ended January 31, 2014: $392,149).

11



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

NOTE 4: MINERAL RIGHTS AND PROPERTIES

Mineral Rights

At January 31, 2015, the Company had mineral rights in the States of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas and Wyoming and the Republic of Paraguay. These mineral rights were acquired through staking and purchase, lease or option agreements and are subject to varying royalty interests, some of which are indexed to the sale price of uranium. At January 31, 2015, annual maintenance payments of approximately $1,060,000 are required to maintain these mineral rights.

Mineral rights and property acquisition costs consisted of the following:

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
Mineral Rights and Properties, Unproven            
   Palangana Mine $  6,587,135   $  6,664,260  
   Goliad Project   8,689,127     8,689,127  
   Burke Hollow Project   1,495,750     1,495,750  
   Longhorn Project   116,870     116,870  
   Salvo Project   364,710     364,710  
   Nichols Project   154,774     154,774  
   Anderson Project   9,154,268     9,154,268  
   Workman Creek Project   1,422,008     1,372,008  
   Los Cuatros Project   257,250     257,250  
   Slick Rock Project   661,271     661,271  
   Yuty Project   11,947,144     11,947,144  
   Coronel Oviedo Project   1,133,412     1,133,412  
   Other Property Acquisitions   285,739     262,115  
    42,269,458     42,272,959  
Accumulated Depletion   (3,784,481)     (3,454,533)  
    38,484,977     38,818,426  
             
Databases   2,405,038     2,405,038  
Accumulated Amortization   (2,052,021)     (1,928,901)  
    353,017     476,137  
             
Land Use Agreements   390,155     390,155  
Accumulated Amortization   (215,525)     (196,019)  
    174,630     194,136  
  $  39,012,624   $  39,488,699  

During the three months ended January 31, 2015, the asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) of the Palangana Mine were revised due to changes in the estimated timing of restoration and reclamation of the Palangana Mine. As a result, ARO liabilities and the corresponding mineral rights and properties associated with the Palangana Mine were reduced by $77,125.

The Company has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for any of its mineral projects. The Company has established the existence of mineralized materials for certain uranium projects, including the Palangana Mine. Since the Company commenced uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine without having established proven or probable reserves, there may be greater inherent uncertainty as to whether or not any mineralized material can be economically extracted as originally planned and anticipated.

12



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

No revenues were generated from the sale of uranium concentrates during the six months ended January 31, 2015 or Fiscal 2014. Historically, the Palangana Mine has been the Company’s sole source for uranium concentrates sold to generate its revenues during Fiscal 2013 and 2012, with no revenues generated prior to Fiscal 2012. The economic viability of the Company’s mining activities, including the expected duration and profitability of the Palangana Mine and of any future satellite ISR mines, such as the Goliad and Burke Hollow Projects, located within the South Texas Uranium Belt, has many risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant, prolonged decrease in the market price of uranium; (ii) difficulty in marketing and/or selling uranium concentrates; (iii) significantly higher than expected capital costs to construct the mine and/or processing plant; (iv) significantly higher than expected extraction costs; (v) significantly lower than expected uranium extraction; (vi) significant delays, reductions or stoppages of uranium extraction activities; and (vii) the introduction of significantly more stringent regulatory laws and regulations. The Company’s mining activities may change as a result of any one or more of these risks and uncertainties and there is no assurance that any ore body that we extract mineralized materials from will result in profitable mining activities.

Mineral property expenditures incurred by major projects were as follows:

    Three Months Ended January 31,     Six Months Ended January 31,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
Mineral Property Expenditures                        
 Palangana Mine $  688,196   $  635,877   $  1,120,856   $  1,307,459  
 Goliad Project   20,036     1,027,060     54,293     1,172,031  
 Burke Hollow Project   159,981     423,771     1,140,548     598,069  
 Longhorn Project   19,477     20,456     30,723     28,700  
 Salvo Project   2,039     227     22,839     1,016  
 Anderson Project   29,250     43,524     123,422     127,685  
 Workman Creek Project   -     1,240     31,300     30,211  
 Slick Rock Project   -     1,986     49,784     51,011  
 Yuty Project   40,872     62,924     259,761     80,749  
 Coronel Oviedo Project   151,178     60,045     295,762     144,196  
 Other Mineral Property Expenditures   143,239     306,910     385,111     631,036  
  $  1,254,268   $  2,584,020   $  3,514,399   $  4,172,163  

NOTE 5: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
          Accumulated     Net Book           Accumulated     Net Book  
    Cost     Depreciation     Value     Cost     Depreciation     Value  
Hobson Processing Facility $  7,107,717   $  (684,550) $  6,423,167   $  7,107,717   $  (595,169)   $  6,512,548  
Mining Equipment   2,441,416     (1,885,595)     555,821     2,587,206     (1,678,958)     908,248  
Logging Equipment and Vehicles   1,962,895     (1,647,849)     315,046     1,855,451     (1,559,850)     295,601  
Computer Equipment   619,625     (563,988)     55,637     645,622     (551,633)     93,989  
Furniture and Fixtures   182,801     (175,752)     7,049     183,810     (164,003)     19,807  
Land   175,144     -     175,144     175,144     -     175,144  
  $ 12,489,598   $  (4,957,734)   $  7,531,864   $ 12,554,950   $ (4,549,613)   $  8,005,337  

13



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

NOTE 6: RECLAMATION DEPOSITS

Reclamation deposits include interest and non-interest bearing deposits held with external financial institutions relating to exploration, pre-extraction, extraction and processing activities in the States of Arizona, Texas and Wyoming.

Reclamation deposits consisted of the following:

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
Palangana Mine $  1,102,981   $  3,689,666  
Hobson Processing Facility   587,228     1,957,476  
Arizona   15,000     15,000  
Wyoming   816     815  
    1,706,025     5,662,957  
Interest   -     15,672  
  $ 1,706,025   $ 5,678,629  

In November 2014, the Company secured $5.6 million of surety bonds, subject to a 2% annual premium on the face value, as an alternate source of financial assurance for its future remediation and decommissioning activities at the Palangana Mine and Hobson Processing Facility. These surety bonds replaced an equivalent amount of reclamation deposits funded entirely through cash payments by the Company, allowing for the release of $3.9 million in cash to the Company. The remaining $1.7 million, representing 30% of the face value of the surety bonds and comprised of $1.1 million relating to the Palangana Mine and $0.6 million relating to the Hobson Processing Facility, is held as restricted cash for collateral purposes as required by the surety.

NOTE 7: DUE TO RELATED PARTIES AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company incurred $33,524 and $72,658 (three and six months ended January 31, 2014: $36,237 and $73,640), respectively, in general and administrative costs paid to a company controlled by a direct family member of a director and officer. In addition, during the six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company issued 15,000 restricted shares to this company for consulting services with a fair value of $18,150 included in general and administrative costs.

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, the Company incurred $9,000 and $18,000, respectively, in consulting fees paid to a company controlled by a former director of the Company.

At January 31, 2015, amounts owed to related parties totaled $4,917 (July 31, 2014: $11,234). These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

NOTE 8: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
Principal amount $  20,000,000   $  20,000,000  
Unamortized discount   (678,361)   (1,294,863)  
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount $  19,321,639   $  18,705,137  

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, the amortization of debt discount totaled $314,044 and $616,502 (three and six months ended January 31, 2014: $465,648 and $896,655), respectively, which were recorded as interest expense and included in the consolidated statements of operations.

14



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

The aggregate yearly maturities of long-term debt based on principal amounts outstanding at January 31, 2015 are as follows:

Fiscal 2015 $  -  
Fiscal 2016   1,666,667  
Fiscal 2017   18,333,333  
Total $  20,000,000  

NOTE 9: ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The Company's asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) relate to site restoration for the Palangana Mine and Hobson Processing Facility.

Balance, July 31, 2014 $  3,967,589  
Revision in estimate of asset retirement obligations   (77,125)
Accretion   160,737  
Balance, January 31, 2015   4,051,201  
Less: current portion of asset retirement obligations   (340,827)
Long-term asset retirement obligations $  3,710,374  

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
Undiscounted amount of estimated cash flows $  6,393,712   $  6,382,549  
             
Payable in years   2.5 to 12     2.5 to 12  
Inflation rate   1.56% to 2.43%     1.56% to 2.43%  
Discount rate   5.00% to 10.50%     5.00% to 10.50%  

The undiscounted amounts of estimated cash flows for the next five fiscal years and beyond are as follows:

Fiscal 2015 $  170,414  
Fiscal 2016   340,827  
Fiscal 2017   1,110,575  
Fiscal 2018   635,932  
Fiscal 2019   -  
Remaining balance   4,135,964  
  $  6,393,712  

NOTE 10: CAPITAL STOCK

Capital Stock

At January 31, 2015, the Company’s capital stock was 750,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.

The Company previously filed a Form S-3 “Shelf” Registration Statement effective September 2, 2011 (the “2011 Shelf”) providing for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company from time to time, at its discretion, up to an aggregate amount of $50 million of which a total of $34.4 million was utilized through public offers and sales of shares and units. The Company filed a further registration statement effective December 31, 2013 providing for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company representing an additional 20%, or $3.1 million, of the then remaining $15.6 million available under the 2011 Shelf, which increased the remaining amount available under the 2011 Shelf to $18.7 million.

15



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

The Company filed a prospectus supplement to the 2011 Shelf, providing for the public offer and sale of the Company’s shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $18.7 million through one or more “at-the-market” offerings (the “ATM Offering”) pursuant to a Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement effective December 31, 2013 between Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., as sales agent, and the Company. During the six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company completed a public offer and sale of 280,045 shares of the Company at a price of $1.70 per share for gross proceeds of $474,788 under the ATM Offering, with transaction costs of $289,870 relating to the 2011 Shelf and ATM Offering previously included in prepaid expenses and deposits charged to additional paid-in capital as corresponding share issuance costs.

The 2011 Shelf expired on September 2, 2014. As a result, no further public offer and sale of the Company’s shares may be completed through the ATM Offering under the 2011 Shelf.

During Fiscal 2014, the Company filed a second Form S-3 “Shelf” Registration Statement effective January 10, 2014 providing for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company from time to time, at its discretion, up to an aggregate offering of $100 million.

Share Transactions

Period / Description   Common     Value per Share     Issuance  
  Shares Issued     Low     High     Value  
Balance, July 31, 2014   90,966,558                    
     Equity Financing   280,045   $  1.70   $ 1.70   $  175,423  
     Consulting Services   254,171     1.07     1.63     330,330  
     Options Exercised   28,937     0.33     0.33     9,550  
Balance, October 31, 2014   91,529,711                    
     Consulting Services   309,898     1.09     1.90     547,095  
     Options Exercised (1)   52,011     0.33     0.45     10,999  
Balance, January 31, 2015   91,891,620                    

(1) 25,000 options were exercised on a cashless basis resulting in 18,679 net shares issued

Share Purchase Warrants

A summary of share purchase warrants outstanding and exercisable at January 31, 2015 is presented below:

  Weighted       Weighted Average
  Average   Number of Warrants Expiry Date Remaining Contractual
  Exercise Price   Outstanding   Life (Years)
$ 1.00   500,000 March 1, 2016 1.08
  1.95   50,000 June 3, 2016 1.34
  2.50   2,600,000 July 30, 2018 3.49
  2.60   1,859,524 October 23, 2016 1.73
$ 2.38   5,009,524   2.58

Stock Options

At January 31, 2015, the Company had one stock option plan, the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan provides for 7,500,000 shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to awards that may be granted and an additional 7,958,941 shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to stock options previously granted under the Company’s prior 2013 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2014 Plan supersedes and replaces the Company’s prior 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, which superseded and replaced the Company’s prior 2009 and 2006 Stock Option Plans, such that no further shares are issuable under these prior plans.

16



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

In September 2014, the Company granted stock options under the 2014 Plan to the Company’s directors, officers, employees and consultants to purchase a total of 7,540,000 shares of the Company exercisable at a price of $1.32 per share over a five-year term. These stock options are subject to an 18-month vesting provision whereby at the end of each of the first three, six, 12 and 18 months after the grant date, 25% of the total stock option grant becomes exercisable.

These stock options have a five-year contractual term, which is significantly different from the 10-year contractual term generally applicable to stock options previously granted by the Company. Since no relevant historical information was available to provide a reasonable basis in estimating the expected life, the Company adopted the simplified method, being the mid-point of the average vesting date and the end of the contractual term, to estimate the expected life for these stock options.

The grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.50 which was valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Expected Risk Free Interest Rate 0.94%
Expected Volatility 56.28%
Expected Life in Years 2.90
Expected Dividend Yield 0.00%

In December 2014, the Company cancelled certain stock options previously granted to the Company’s directors, officers, employees and consultants to purchase a total of 4,294,000 shares of the Company exercisable at prices ranging from $2.25 to $5.65 per share with original contractual terms of ten years.

A continuity schedule of outstanding stock options for the underlying common shares for the six months ended January 31, 2015 is presented below:

                Weighted Average  
    Number of Stock     Weighted Average     Remaining Contractual  
    Options     Exercise Price     Term (Years)  
Balance, July 31, 2014   7,987,214   $  2.10     4.97  
     Issued   7,540,000     1.32     4.84  
     Exercised   (28,937)   0.33     1.28  
     Forfeited   (58,750)     2.82     7.26  
Balance, October 31, 2014   15,439,527     1.72     4.78  
     Issued   50,000     1.20     4.97  
     Exercised   (58,332)     0.38     1.45  
     Expired   (487)     5.13     -  
     Forfeited   (67,500)     2.25     5.28  
     Cancelled   (4,294,000)     2.59     5.59  
Balance, January 31, 2015   11,069,208   $  1.39     4.16  

At January 31, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value under the provisions of ASC 718 of all outstanding stock options was estimated at $1,669,939 (vested: $1,666,439 and unvested: $3,500).

At January 31, 2015, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the unvested portion of stock options granted under the Company’s 2014 Plan totaled $1,412,823 to be recognized over the next 1.09 years.

17



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

A summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable at January 31, 2015 is presented below:

    Options Outstanding     Options Exercisable  
          Weighted           Weighted  
Range of Exercise Prices   Outstanding at     Average Exercise     Exercisable at     Average Exercise  
    January 31, 2015     Price     January 31, 2015     Price  
$0.33 to $0.70   1,913,922   $  0.41     1,913,922   $  0.41  
$0.71 to $2.45   8,187,500     1.38     2,501,250     1.53  
$2.46 to $5.90   967,786     3.33     967,786     3.33  
    11,069,208   $  1.39     5,382,958   $  1.46  

Stock-Based Compensation

A summary of stock-based compensation expense is presented below:

    Three Months Ended January 31,   Six Months Ended January 31,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
Stock-Based Consulting Fees                         
     Common stock issued for consulting services $  547,094   $  266,366   $  877,425   $  556,918  
     Options issued to consultants   274,056     60,114     374,435     73,718  
    821,150     326,480     1,251,860     630,636  
Stock-Based Management Fees                        
     Options issued to management   589,003     55,000     1,161,279     55,000  
    589,003     55,000     1,161,279     55,000  
Stock-Based Wages and Benefits                        
     Options issued to employees   446,217     34,404     897,527     68,573  
    446,217     34,404     897,527     68,573  
                         
Stock-based compensation charged to inventory   -     (1,650)   -     (2,643)  
  $  1,856,370   $  414,234   $  3,310,666   $  751,566  

NOTE 11: LOSS PER SHARE

The following table reconciles weighted average number of shares used in the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

    Three Months Ended January 31,     Six Months Ended Janury 31,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
Numerator                        
Net Loss for the Period $  (5,875,540) $  (7,178,894)   $  (12,601,767)   $  (13,058,828)  
                         
Denominator                        
Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares   91,746,410     89,701,157     91,513,626     88,058,149  
Dilutive Stock Options and Warrants   -     -     -     -  
Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares   91,746,410     89,701,157     91,513,626     88,058,149  
                         
Net Loss per Share, Basic and Diluted $  (0.06)   $  (0.08)   $  (0.14)   $  (0.15)  

For the three months and six months ended January 31, 2015 and 2014, all outstanding stock options and share purchase warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share since the Company reported net losses for those periods and their effects would be anti-dilutive.

18



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

NOTE 12: SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company currently operates in a single reportable segment and is focused on uranium mining and related activities, including exploration, pre-extraction, extraction and processing of uranium concentrates.

At January 31, 2015, long-term assets located in the U.S. totaled $35,264,472 or 73% of the Company’s total long-term assets of $48,376,229.

The table below provides a breakdown of the Company’s long-term assets by geographic segments:

    January 31, 2015  
Balance Sheet Items         United States           Canada     Paraguay     Total  
    Texas     Arizona     Other States              
Deferred Financing Costs $  125,716   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  125,716  
Mineral Rights and Properties   14,183,979     10,841,861     906,229     -     13,080,555     39,012,624  
Property, Plant and Equipment   7,500,662     -     -     12,169     19,033     7,531,864  
Reclamation Deposits   1,690,209     15,000     816     -     -     1,706,025  
Total Long-term Assets $ 23,500,566   $ 10,856,861   $  907,045   $  12,169   $ 13,099,588   $ 48,376,229  

    July 31, 2014  
Balance Sheet Items         United States           Canada     Paraguay     Total  
    Texas     Arizona     Other States              
Deferred Financing Costs $  167,621   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  167,621  
Mineral Rights and Properties   14,732,677     10,791,861     883,606     -     13,080,555     39,488,699  
Property, Plant and Equipment   7,966,833     -     465     12,960     25,079     8,005,337  
Reclamation Deposits   5,662,814     15,000     815     -     -     5,678,629  
Total Long-term Assets $ 28,529,945    $ 10,806,861   $  884,886   $  12,960   $ 13,105,634    $ 53,340,286  

19



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

The tables below provide a breakdown of the Company’s operating results by geographic segments. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

                Three Months Ended January 31, 2015        
Statement of Operations   United States     Canada     Paraguay     Total  
    Texas     Arizona     Other States                 
Sales $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
                                     
Costs and Expenses:                                    
    Cost of sales   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    Inventory write-down   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    Mineral property expenditures   1,009,065     30,359     22,794     -     192,050     1,254,268  
    General and administrative   2,708,137     40,341     7,061     603,798     7,112     3,366,449  
    Depreciation, amortization and accretion   482,655     -     687     3,034     3,108     489,484  
    Impairment loss on mineral property   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    4,199,857     70,700     30,542     606,832     202,270     5,110,201  
Loss from operations   (4,199,857)     (70,700)     (30,542)     (606,832)     (202,270)     (5,110,201)  
                                     
Other income and (expenses)   (762,161)     (5,189)     -     (120)     4     (767,466)  
Loss before income taxes $  (4,962,018)   $  (75,889)   $  (30,542)   $  (606,952)   $  (202,266)   $  (5,877,667)  

    Three Months Ended January 31, 2014  
Statement of Operations   United States     Canada     Paraguay     Total  
    Texas     Arizona     Other States              
Sales $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
                                     
Costs and Expenses:                                    
   Cost of sales   -     -     -     -     -     -  
   Inventory write-down   -     -     -     -     -     -  
   Mineral property expenditures   2,370,002     54,838     36,210     -     122,970     2,584,020  
   General and administrative   1,847,137     110,229     23,631     1,085,483     16,000     3,082,480  
   Depreciation, amortization and accretion   633,823     -     780     10,308     2,970     647,881  
   Impairment loss on mineral property   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    4,850,962     165,067     60,621     1,095,791     141,940     6,314,381  
Loss from operations   (4,850,962)     (165,067)   (60,621)     (1,095,791)     (141,940)     (6,314,381)  
                                   
Other income and (expenses)   (859,374)     (5,189)     -     33     17     (864,513)  
Loss before income taxes $  (5,710,336)   $  (170,256)   $  (60,621)   $  (1,095,758)   $  (141,923)   $  (7,178,894)  

20



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

    Six Months Ended January 31, 2015  
Statement of Operations   United States     Canada     Paraguay     Total  
    Texas     Arizona     Other States              
Sales $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
                                     
Costs and Expenses:                                    
    Cost of sales   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    Inventory write-down   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    Mineral property expenditures   2,644,891     157,467     156,519     -     555,522     3,514,399  
    General and administrative   5,056,097     96,877     14,025     1,362,183     14,855     6,544,037  
    Depreciation, amortization and accretion   1,052,548     -     1,467     6,497     6,214     1,066,726  
    Impairment loss on mineral property   -     -     -     -     -     -  
    8,753,536     254,344     172,011     1,368,680     576,591     11,125,162  
Loss from operations   (8,753,536)     (254,344)     (172,011)     (1,368,680)     (576,591)     (11,125,162)  
                                     
Other income and (expenses)   (1,490,052)     (10,378)     -     (120)     315     (1,500,235)  
Loss before income taxes $  (10,243,588)   $  (264,722)   $  (172,011)   $  (1,368,800)   $  (576,276)   $  (12,625,397)  

    Six Months Ended January 31, 2014  
Statement of Operations   United States     Canada     Paraguay     Total  
    Texas     Arizona     Other States              
Sales $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
                                     
Costs and Expenses:                                    
   Cost of sales   -     -     -     -     -     -  
   Inventory write-down   392,149     -     -     -     -     392,149  
   Mineral property expenditures   3,615,463     181,531     150,224     -     224,945     4,172,163  
   General and administrative   3,171,670     144,646     64,963     1,990,105     16,885     5,388,269  
   Depreciation, amortization and accretion   1,161,119     758     5,910     15,231     5,942     1,188,960  
   Impairment loss on mineral property   -     -     28,891     -     -     28,891  
    8,340,401     326,935     249,988     2,005,336     247,772     11,170,432  
Loss from operations   (8,340,401)   (326,935)     (249,988)   (2,005,336)     (247,772)     (11,170,432)  
                                     
Other income and (expenses)   (1,875,861)     (10,378)     -     (2,190)     33     (1,888,396)  
Loss before income taxes $  (10,216,262)   $  (337,313)   $  (249,988)   $  (2,007,526)   $  (247,739)   $  (13,058,828)  

NOTE 13: SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

During the six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company issued 564,069 restricted shares with a fair value of $877,425 for consulting services.

NOTE 14: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is renting or leasing various office or storage space located in the United States, Canada and Paraguay with total monthly payments of $19,472. Office lease agreements expire between April 2015 to January 2016 for the United States and Canada.

The aggregate minimum payments over the next five fiscal years are as follows:

Fiscal 2015 $  113,396  
Fiscal 2016   36,428  
  $  149,824  

The Company is committed to pay its key executives a total of $740,000 per year for management services.

On or about March 9, 2011, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the “TCEQ”) granted the Company’s applications for a Class III Injection Well Permit, Production Area Authorization and Aquifer Exemption for its Goliad Project. On or about December 4, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) concurred with the TCEQ issuance of the Aquifer Exemption permit (the “AE”). With the receipt of this concurrence, the finalauthorization required for uranium extraction, the Goliad Project achieved fully-permitted status. On or about May 24, 2011, a group of petitioners, inclusive of Goliad County, appealed the TCEQ action to the 250 th District Court in Travis County, Texas. A motion filed by the Company to intervene in this matter was granted. The petitioners’ appeal lay dormant until on or about June 14, 2013, when the petitioners filed their initial brief in support of their position. On or about January 18, 2013, a different group of petitioners, exclusive of Goliad County, filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the United States (the “Fifth Circuit”) to appeal the EPA’s decision. On or about March 5, 2013, a motion filed by the Company to intervene in this matter was granted. The parties attempted to resolve both appeals and, to facilitate discussions and to avoid further legal costs, the parties jointly agreed, through mediation which was initially conducted through the Fifth Circuit on or about August 8, 2013, to abate the proceedings in the State District Court. On or about August 21, 2013, the State District Court agreed to abate the proceedings. The EPA subsequently filed a motion to remand without vacatur with the Fifth Circuit wherein the EPA's stated purpose was to elicit additional public input and further explain its rationale for the approval. In requesting the remand without vacatur, which would allow the AE to remain in place during the review period, the EPA denied the existence of legal error and stated that it was unaware of any additional information that would merit reversal of the AE. The Company and the TCEQ filed a request to the Fifth Circuit for the motion to remand without vacatur, if granted, to be limited to a 60-day review period. On December 9, 2013, by way of a procedural order from a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit, the Court granted the remand without vacatur and initially limited the review period to 60 days. In March of 2014, at the EPA’s request, the Fifth Circuit extended the EPA’s time period for review and additionally, during that same period, the Company conducted a joint groundwater survey of the site, the result of which reaffirmed the Company’s previously filed groundwater direction studies. On or about June 17, 2014, the EPA reaffirmed its earlier decision to uphold the granting of the Company’s existing AE, with the exception of a northwestern portion containing less than 10% of the uranium resource which was withdrawn, but not denied, from the AE area until additional information is provided in the normal course of mine development. On or about September 9, 2014, the petitioners filed a status report with the State District Court which included a request to remove the stay agreed to in August 2013 and to set a briefing schedule (the “Status Report”). In that Status Report, the petitioners also stated that they had decided not to pursue their appeal at the Fifth Circuit. The Company continues to believe that the pending appeal is without merit and is continuing forward as planned towards uranium extraction at its fully-permitted Goliad Project.

21



URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
 

On or about April 3, 2012, the Company received notification of a lawsuit filed in the State of Arizona, in the Superior Court for the County of Yavapai, by certain petitioners (the “Plaintiffs”) against a group of defendants, including the Company and former management and board members of Concentric. The lawsuit asserts certain claims relating to the Plaintiffs’ equity investments in Concentric, including allegations that the former management and board members of Concentric engaged in various wrongful acts prior to and/or in conjunction with the merger of Concentric. The lawsuit originally further alleged that the Company was contractually liable for liquidated damages arising from a pre-merger transaction which the Company previously acknowledged and recorded as an accrued liability, and which portion of the lawsuit was settled in full by a cash payment of $149,194 to the Plaintiffs and subsequently dismissed. The court dismissed several other claims set forth in the Plaintiffs’ initial complaint, but granted the Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint. The court denied a subsequent motion to dismiss the amended complaint, finding that the pleading met the minimal pleading requirements under the applicable procedural rules. In October 2013, the Company filed a formal response denying liability for any of the Plaintiffs’ remaining claims and is vigorously defending against any and all remaining claims asserted under this lawsuit. The parties have exchanged preliminary disclosure statements, and formal discovery is currently in progress. A trial date has been set for April 2016. The Company continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit, and intends to file a dispositive motion prior to the deadline set by the court.

22


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company (“MD&A”) contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, among others, statements regarding our capital needs, business plans and expectations. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors including the risks, uncertainties and assumptions set forth in the reports and other documents we have filed with or furnished to the SEC, including, without limitation, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended January 31, 2015 and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014 including the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained therein. These factors, or any one of them, may cause our actual results or actions in the future to differ materially from any forward-looking statement made in this document. Refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” under Part II - Other Information.

Introduction

This MD&A is focused on material changes in our financial condition from July 31, 2014, our most recently completed year-end, to January 31, 2015 and our results of operations for the three and six months ended January 31, 2015 and 2014, and should be read in conjunction with the MD&A contained in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.

Business

We operate in a single reportable segment and since 2004, as more fully described in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014, we have been engaged in uranium mining and related activities, including exploration, pre-extraction, extraction and processing, on uranium projects located in the United States and Paraguay.

We utilize in-situ recovery (“ISR”) mining where possible which we believe, when compared to conventional open pit or underground mining, requires lower capital and operating expenditures with a shorter lead time to extraction and a reduced impact on the environment. We have one uranium mine located in the State of Texas, the Palangana Mine, which utilizes ISR mining and commenced extraction of uranium concentrates (“U 3 O 8 ”), or yellowcake, in November 2010. We have one uranium processing facility or mill located in the State of Texas, the Hobson Processing Facility, which processes material from the Palangana Mine into drums of U 3 O 8 , our only sales product and source of revenue, for shipping to a third-party storage and sales facility. At January 31, 2015, we had no uranium supply or “off-take” agreements in place.

Our fully-licensed and 100%-owned Hobson Processing Facility forms the basis for our regional operating strategy in the State of Texas, specifically the South Texas Uranium Belt where we utilize ISR mining. We utilize a “hub-and-spoke” strategy whereby the Hobson Processing Facility, which has a physical capacity to process uranium-loaded resins up to a total of two million pounds of U 3 O 8 annually and is licensed to process up to one million pounds of U 3 O 8 annually, acts as the central processing site (the “hub”) for our Palangana Mine and future satellite uranium mining activities, such as our Goliad and Burke Hollow Projects, located within the South Texas Uranium Belt (the “spokes”).

We also hold certain mineral rights in various stages in the States of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas and Wyoming and in the Republic of Paraguay, many of which are located in historically successful mining areas and have been the subject of past exploration and pre-extraction activities by other mining companies. We do not expect, however, to utilize ISR mining for all of our mineral rights in which case we would expect to rely on conventional open pit and/or underground mining techniques.

Our operating and strategic framework is based on expanding our uranium extraction activities, which includes advancing certain uranium projects with established mineralized materials towards uranium extraction, and establishing additional mineralized materials on our existing uranium projects or through acquisition of additional uranium projects.

On September 5, 2013, we announced a strategic plan to align our operations to adapt to the existing uranium market in a challenging post-Fukushima environment, most notably the uranium spot price being at historical lows. Since then, uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine has operated at a reduced pace, including the deferral of any further pre-extraction expenditures, to maintain operational readiness in anticipation of a recovery in uranium spot prices. Pre-extraction activities at other PAAs of the Palangana Mine and at the Goliad Project have continued, as well as further exploration and permitting activities completed at the Burke Hollow Project.

23


During the six months ended January 31, 2015:

  • permitting activities continued to advance at other PAAs of the Palangana Mine;
  • permitting activities continued and a drill program comprised of 43 exploration holes totaling 22,295 feet was completed at the Burke Hollow Project located in Texas;
  • a Preliminary Economic Assessment dated July 6, 2014 prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators, (“NI 43- 101”) was filed for the Anderson Project located in Arizona;
  • an updated Technical Report dated October 6, 2014 prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 was filed for the Burke Hollow Project;
  • a public offer and sale of 280,045 shares of the Company was completed at a price of $1.70 per share for gross proceeds of $474,788 under the ATM Offering;
  • $5.6 million of surety bonds were secured, subject to a 2% annual premium on the face value, which replaced an equivalent amount of reclamation deposits related to future remediation and decommissioning activities at the Palangana Mine and Hobson Processing Facility, and resulted in the release of $3.9 million as cash and cash equivalents to the Company; and
  • Scott Melbye was appointed Executive Vice President and Craig Wall was appointed Vice President of Environmental, Health and Safety.

Mineral Rights and Properties

The following is a summary of significant activities by project for the six months ended January 31, 2015:

Texas: Palangana Mine

During the six months ended January 31, 2015, we continued with our strategic plan for reduced operations initiated in Fiscal 2014. Since then, uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine has operated at a reduced pace, including the deferral of any further pre-extraction expenditures, to maintain operational readiness in anticipation of a recovery in uranium spot prices.

The Mine Area permit to include additional PAAs at the Palangana Mine was approved and issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”). Both the PAA-4 permit and the Radioactive Material License amendment to add PAA-4 were approved and issued by the TCEQ. The Aquifer Exemption amendment to include PAA-4 was approved and issued by the TCEQ and submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency for final approval and concurrence.

Texas: Burke Hollow Project

During the six months ended January 31, 2015, 43 exploration holes totaling 22,295 feet were drilled at the Burke Hollow Project to depths ranging from a minimum 140 feet to a maximum 1,100 feet, with an average depth of 518 feet. At January 31, 2015, a total of 526 exploration holes, including 30 monitor wells, totaling 246,400 feet have been drilled to depths ranging from a minimum 140 feet to a maximum 1,100 feet, with an average depth of 468 feet.

The Mine Area, Aquifer Exemption, Radioactive Material License and two Waste Disposal Well applications continue to be under technical review by the TCEQ.

An updated Technical Report dated of October 6, 2014 prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 was filed for the Burke Hollow Project which summarized the geology and mineralized materials resulting from the Company’s three drilling campaigns conducted between May 2012 and September 2014.

24


Arizona: Anderson Project

Planning is underway for initiating baseline data acquisition activities in support of mine permitting at the Anderson Project. A Preliminary Economic Assessment dated July 6, 2014 prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 was completed and filed in September 2014.

Results of Operations

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, we recorded a net loss of $5,875,540 ($0.06 per share) and $12,601,767 ($0.14 per share), respectively. Costs and expenses during the three and six months ended January 31, 2015 were $5,110,201 and $11,125,162, respectively.

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, we recorded a net loss of $7,178,894 ($0.08 per share) and $13,058,828 ($0.15 per share), respectively. Costs and expenses during the three and six months ended January 31, 2014 were $6,314,381 and $11,170,432, respectively.

Uranium Extraction Activities

During the six months ended January 31, 2015, we continued with our strategic plan for reduced operations initiated in Fiscal 2014. Uranium extraction at PAA-1, 2 and 3 of the Palangana Mine has continued to operate at a reduced pace and as a result, U 3 O 8 pounds extracted from the Palangana Mine and processed at the Hobson Processing Facility have decreased significantly. During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015 , the Palangana Mine extracted 4,000 and 11,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 , respectively, while the Hobson Processing Facility processed 3,000 and 11,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 , respectively. During the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, the Palangana Mine extracted 12,000 and 27,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 , respectively, while the Hobson Processing Facility processed 12,000 and 28,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 , respectively.

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015 and 2014, no revenue from sales of U 3 O8 was generated. Since commencing uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine in November 2010 to January 31, 2015, the Hobson Processing Facility has processed finished goods representing 571,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 , of which 490,000 pounds have been sold, resulting in a finished goods inventory balance of 81,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 remaining as of January 31, 2015.

At January 31, 2015, the total value of inventories was $2,101,666, of which $2,021,527 (96%) represented the carrying value of finished goods of U 3 O 8 , $55,487 (3%) represented the carrying value of work-in-progress and $24,652 (1%) represented the carrying value of supplies. The cash component of the total carrying value of inventories was $1,689,711 and the non-cash component of the total carrying value of inventory was $411,955. For the six months ended January 31, 2015, no inventory write-down to net realizable value was recognized.

At July 31, 2014, the total value of inventories was $1,896,475 of which $1,806,587 (96%) represented the carrying value of finished goods of U 3 O 8 ,$63,257 (3%) represented the carrying value of work-in-progress and $26,631 (1%) represented the carrying value of supplies. The cash component of the total carrying value of inventories was $1,527,676 and the non-cash component of the total carrying value of inventory was $368,799. During Fiscal 2014, inventory write-downs totaling $804,060 were recognized to adjust the U 3 O 8 inventory balances in finished goods and work-in-progress to net realizable values to reflect market prices of U 3 O 8 , less estimated royalties.

Cash and non-cash components of the total value of inventories represent non-GAAP financial measures which we believe are important in evaluating our operating results not only for management but for our investors. We use these measures to compare our performance with other mining companies and rely upon them as part of management’s decision-making process.

Costs and Expenses

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, costs and expenses totaled $5,110,201 and $11,125,162, respectively, comprised of mineral property expenditures of $1,254,268 and $3,514,399, general and administrative of $3,366,449 and $6,544,037 and depreciation, amortization and accretion of $489,484 and $1,066,726. No inventory write-down or impairment loss on mineral property was recorded. During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, no sales of U 3 O 8 were generated therefore no corresponding cost of sales were recorded. During the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, costs and expenses totaled $6,314,381 and $11,170,432, respectively, comprised of inventory write-down of $Nil and $392,149, mineral property expenditures of $2,584,020 and $4,172,163, general and administrative of $3,082,480 and $5,388,269, depreciation, amortization and accretion of $647,881 and $1,188,960 and impairment loss on mineral property of $Nil and $28,891. During the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, no sales of U 3 O 8 were generated therefore no corresponding cost of sales were recorded.

25


Mineral Property Expenditures

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, mineral property expenditures totaled $1,254,268 and $3,514,399, respectively, comprised of expenditures relating to permitting, property maintenance, exploration, pre-extraction and all other non-extraction related activities on our uranium projects. Additionally, these amounts include uranium extraction expenditures directly related to maintaining operational readiness and permitting compliance of $466,336 and $958,360, respectively, for the Palangana Mine and Hobson Processing Facility.

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, mineral property expenditures totaled $2,584,020 and $4,172,163, respectively, comprised of expenditures relating to permitting, property maintenance, exploration, pre-extraction and all other non-extraction related activities on our uranium projects. Additionally, these amounts include uranium extraction expenditures directly related to maintaining operational readiness of $751,918 and $1,281,366, respectively, for the Palangana Mine and Hobson Processing Facility.

The following table is a summary of the mineral property expenditures incurred on our uranium projects:

    Three Months Ended January 31,     Six Months Ended January 31,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
Mineral Property Expenditures                        
 Palangana Mine $  688,196   $  635,877   $  1,120,856   $  1,307,459  
 Goliad Project   20,036     1,027,060     54,293     1,172,031  
 Burke Hollow Project   159,981     423,771     1,140,548     598,069  
 Longhorn Project   19,477     20,456     30,723     28,700  
 Salvo Project   2,039     227     22,839     1,016  
 Anderson Project   29,250     43,524     123,422     127,685  
 Workman Creek Project   -     1,240     31,300     30,211  
 Slick Rock Project   -     1,986     49,784     51,011  
 Yuty Project   40,872     62,924     259,761     80,749  
 Coronel Oviedo Project   151,178     60,045     295,762     144,196  
 Other Mineral Property Expenditures   143,239     306,910     385,111     631,036  
  $  1,254,268   $  2,584,020   $  3,514,399   $  4,172,163  

General and Administrative

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, general and administrative expenses totaled $3,366,449 and $6,544,037 (three and six months ended January 31, 2014: $3,082,480 and $5,388,269), respectively.

The following summary provides a discussion of the major expense categories, including salaries, management and consulting fees; office, investor relations, communications and travel; professional fees; and stock-based compensation, including analyses of the factors that caused any significant variances compared to the same period last year:

  • For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, salaries, management and consulting fees totaled $623,136 and $1,280,279 which decreased by $903,372 and $940,931, respectively, compared with $1,526,508 and $2,221,210 for the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, respectively. These decreases were primarily the result of no bonus payments made to certain directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company during the six months ended January 31, 2015;

26


  • For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, office, investor relations, communications and travel expenses totaled $684,767 and $1,422,550 which decreased by $41,633 and $160,776, respectively, compared with $726,400 and $1,583,326 for the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, respectively. These decreases reflect our continuing efforts to monitor and control our costs overall to reduce expenses wherever possible;

  • For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, professional fees totaled $202,177 and $530,543 which decreased by $213,161 and $301,624, respectively, compared with $415,338 and $832,167 for the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, respectively. These decreases were primarily the result of a decrease in professional fees relating to regulatory filings and legal proceedings; and

  • For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, stock-based compensation totaled $1,856,369 and $3,310,665 which increased by $1,442,135 and $2,559,099, respectively, compared with $414,234 and $751,566 for the three months and six months ended January 31, 2014, respectively. These increases were primarily the result of stock options granted to the Company’s directors, officers, employees and consultants in September 2014, as well as an increase in equity-based payments for consulting services as part of our efforts to reduce cash outlay.

Depreciation, Amortization and Accretion

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, depreciation, amortization and accretion totaled $489,484 and $1,066,726 which decreased by $158,397 and $122,234, respectively, compared with $647,881 and $1,188,960 for the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, respectively. These decreases were primarily the result of extensions in the estimated useful lives relating to the Palangana Mine combined with the effects of certain equipment and property reaching full depletion and depreciation. Depreciation, amortization and accretion include depreciation and amortization of long-term assets acquired in the normal course of operations and accretion of asset retirement obligations.

Interest and Finance Costs

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, interest and finance costs totaled $767,854 and $1,505,343 which decreased by $64,234 and $124,192, respectively, compared with $832,088 and $1,629,535 for the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, respectively. These decreases were primarily the result of extending the long-term debt term from two years to four years during Fiscal 2014.

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, interest and finance costs were primarily comprised of, respectively, amortization of deferred financing costs of $20,953 and $41,905, amortization of debt discount of $314,044 and $616,502, interest paid on long-term debt of $408,889 and $817,778 and amortization of annual surety bond premium of $18,780 and $18,780.

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, interest and finance costs were primarily comprised of, respectively, amortization of deferred financing costs of $54,584 and $109,168, amortization of debt discount of $465,648 and $896,655 and interest and standby fees paid on long-term debt of $306,667 and $613,333.

27


Summary of Quarterly Results

    For the Quarters Ended  
    January 31, 2015     October 31, 2014     July 31, 2014     April 30, 2014  
                         
Sales $  -   $  -    $ -   $  -  
Net loss   (5,875,540)   (6,726,227)     (6,219,172)     (6,697,107)  
Total comprehensive loss   (5,876,988)     (6,726,451)     (6,219,156)     (6,704,335)  
Basic and diluted loss per share   (0.06)     (0.07)     (0.07)     (0.08)  
Total assets   55,525,074     59,838,854     64,907,320     70,496,960  

    For the Quarters Ended  
    January 31, 2014     October 31, 2013     July 31, 2013     April 30, 2013  
                         
Sales $  -   $  -    $ 1,980,000   $  2,789,325  
Net loss   (7,178,894)   (5,879,934)     (5,077,213)     (3,900,045)  
Total comprehensive loss   (7,182,920)     (5,882,235)     (5,050,693)     (3,900,279)  
Basic and diluted loss per share   (0.08)     (0.07)     (0.06)     (0.05)  
Total assets   67,320,964     73,692,104     73,250,001     67,927,245  

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On September 5, 2013, we announced a strategic plan to align our operations to adapt to the existing uranium market in a challenging post-Fukushima environment, most notably the uranium spot price being at historical lows. Since then, uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine has operated at a reduced pace, including the deferral of any further pre-extraction expenditures, to maintain operational readiness in anticipation of a recovery in uranium spot prices. Pre-extraction activities at other PAAs of the Palangana Mine and at the Goliad Project have continued, as well as further exploration and permitting activities completed at the Burke Hollow Project. As a result, we did not rely on cash flows generated from our mining activities during the six months ended January 31, 2015 or Fiscal 2014 to the extent relied upon during Fiscal 2013 and 2012.

In November 2014, we secured $5.6 million of surety bonds, subject to a 2% annual premium on the face value, as an alternate source of financial assurance for future remediation and decommissioning activities at the Palangana Mine and Hobson Processing Facility. These surety bonds replaced an equivalent amount of reclamation deposits funded entirely through cash payments by the Company, allowing for the release of $3.9 million in cash to the Company. The remaining $1.7 million, representing 30% of the face value of the surety bonds and comprised of $1.1 million relating to the Palangana Mine and $0.6 million relating to the Hobson Processing Facility, is held as restricted cash for collateral purposes as required by the surety.

The components of working capital include the following:

    January 31, 2015     July 31, 2014  
Cash and cash equivalents $  4,362,544   $  8,839,892  
Current assets   7,148,845     11,567,034  
Current liabilities   1,478,416     2,298,334  
Working capital   5,670,429     9,268,700  

At January 31, 2015, we had working capital of $5,670,429, a decrease of $3,598,271 from our working capital of $9,268,700 at July 31, 2014. At January 31, 2015, we had $4,362,544 (July 31, 2014: $8,839,892) in cash and cash equivalents, which continues to represent the largest component of our working capital balance. As a result, our working capital balance will fluctuate significantly as we secure additional financing and utilize our cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations including exploration and pre-extraction activities.

At January 31, 2015, we had 81,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 in finished goods inventories that were available for sale with a carrying value of $2,021,527 and an approximate market value of $3.1 million.

Although our planned principal operations have commenced from which significant revenues from sales of U 3 O 8 were realized during Fiscal 2013 of $9,026,325 and Fiscal 2012 of $13,757,400, we have yet to achieve profitability and have had a history of operating losses and significant negative cash flow since inception. No revenue from the sale of U 3 O 8 was realized during the six months ended January 31, 2015 or Fiscal 2014. For the six months ended January 31, 2015 and 2014, our net losses totaled $12,601,767 and $13,058,828, respectively, and we had an accumulated deficit balance of $181,263,913 as at January 31, 2015. During the six months ended January 31, 2015, net cash flows decreased by $4,477,348 compared to a decrease of $5,137,861 during the six months ended January 31, 2014.

28


As described above, at January 31, 2015, we had working capital of $5.7 million including cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate additional financing which we have successfully secured since inception, including those from asset divestitures. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing including further asset divestitures and accordingly, there is substantial doubt as to whether our existing cash resources and working capital are sufficient to enable the Company to continue its operations for the next twelve months.

Historically, we have been reliant primarily on equity financings from the sale of our common stock and, during Fiscal 2014 and 2013, on debt financing in order to fund our operations, and this reliance is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. During Fiscal 2013 and 2012, we also relied on cash flows generated from our mining activities; however, we have yet to achieve profitability or develop positive cash flow from operations, and we do not expect to achieve profitability or develop positive cash flow from operations in the near term. Our reliance on equity and debt financings is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, and their availability whenever such additional financing is required will be dependent on many factors beyond our control including, but not limited to, the market price of uranium, the continuing public support of nuclear power as a viable source of electricity generation, the volatility in the global financial markets affecting our stock price and the status of the worldwide economy, any one of which may cause significant challenges in our ability to access additional financing, including access to the equity and credit markets. We may also be required to seek other forms of financing, such as joint venture arrangements to continue advancing our uranium projects which would depend entirely on finding a suitable third party willing to enter into such an arrangement, typically involving an assignment of a percentage interest in the mineral project. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing when required and on terms favorable to us.

Our operations are capital intensive and future capital expenditures are expected to be substantial, and we will require significant additional financing to fund our operations, including continuing with our exploration and pre-extraction activities. In the absence of such additional financing, we would not be able to fund our operations, including continuing with our exploration and pre-extraction activities, which may result in delays, curtailment or abandonment of any one or all of our uranium projects.

Our anticipated operations including exploration and pre-extraction activities, however, will be dependent on and may change as a result of our financial position, the market price of uranium and other considerations, and such change may include accelerating the pace or broadening the scope of reducing our operations as originally announced on September 5, 2013. Our ability to secure adequate funding for these activities will be impacted by our operating performance, other uses of cash, the market price of uranium, the market price of our common stock and other factors which may be beyond our control. Specific examples of such factors include, but are not limited to:

  • if the weakness in the market price of uranium experienced in Fiscal 2014 continues or weakens further during Fiscal 2015;
  • if the weakness in the market price of our common stock experienced in Fiscal 2014 continues or weakens further during Fiscal 2015;
  • if we default on making scheduled payments of principal, interest and fees and complying with the restrictive covenants as required under our debt financing during Fiscal 2015, and it results in accelerated repayment of our indebtedness and/or enforcement by the lenders against certain key assets securing our indebtedness; and
  • if another nuclear incident, such as the events that occurred at Fukushima in March 2011, were to occur during Fiscal 2015, continuing public support of nuclear power as a viable source of electricity generation may be adversely affected, which may result in significant and adverse effects on both the nuclear and uranium industries.

29


Our long-term success, including the recoverability of the carrying values of our assets and our ability to acquire additional uranium projects and continue with exploration and pre-extraction activities and mining activities on our existing uranium projects, will depend ultimately on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow from our operations by establishing ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium and to develop these into profitable mining activities. The economic viability of our mining activities, including the expected duration and profitability of the Palangana Mine and of any future satellite ISR mines, such as the Goliad and Burke Hollow Projects, located within the South Texas Uranium Belt, has many risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant, prolonged decrease in the market price of uranium; (ii) difficulty in marketing and/or selling uranium concentrates; (iii) significantly higher than expected capital costs to construct the mine and/or processing plant; (iv) significantly higher than expected extraction costs; (v) significantly lower than expected uranium extraction; (vi) significant delays, reductions or stoppages of uranium extraction activities; and (vii) the introduction of significantly more stringent regulatory laws and regulations. Our mining activities may change as a result of any one or more of these risks and uncertainties and there is no assurance that any ore body that we extract mineralized materials from will result in profitable mining activities.

Equity Financings

We previously filed a Form S-3 “Shelf” Registration Statement effective September 2, 2011 (the “2011 Shelf”) providing for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company from time to time, at our discretion, up to an aggregate amount of $50 million of which a total of $34.4 million was utilized through public offers and sales of shares and units. We filed a further registration statement effective December 31, 2013 providing for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company representing an additional 20%, or $3.1 million, of the then remaining $15.6 million available under the 2011 Shelf, which increased the remaining amount available under the 2011 Shelf to $18.7 million.

We filed a prospectus supplement to the 2011 Shelf, providing for the public offer and sale of the Company’s shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $18.7 million through one or more “at-the-market” offerings (the “ATM Offering”) pursuant to a Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement effective December 31, 2013 between Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., as sales agent, and the Company. During the six months ended January 31, 2015, we completed a public offer and sale of 280,045 shares of the Company at a price of $1.70 per share for gross proceeds of $474,788 under the ATM Offering.

The 2011 Shelf expired on September 2, 2014. As a result, no further public offer and sale of the Company’s shares may be completed through the ATM Offering under the 2011 Shelf.

We filed a second Form S-3 “Shelf” Registration Statement effective January 10, 2014 providing for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company from time to time, at its discretion, up to an aggregate offering of $100 million.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended January 31, 2015 was $8,795,608 (six months ended January 31, 2014: $11,273,060). Significant operating expenditures included uranium extraction costs, mineral property expenditures and general and administrative expenses.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended January 31, 2015 was $425,273, resulting primarily from net cash of $411,041 received from the issuance of common shares from the equity financing and $20,549 received from the exercise of stock options. Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended January 31, 2014 was $6,274,620, resulting primarily from net cash of $6,610,576 received from the issuance of common shares from the equity financing and $22,501 received from the exercise of stock options, offset by transaction costs of $357,497 related to the loan facility.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended January 31, 2015 was $3,892,987, resulting primarily from gross proceeds of $5,663,158 received from the release of reclamation deposits, offset by the payment of collateral for the surety bonds of $1,690,208, acquisition of mineral rights and properties of $73,624 and purchase of property, plant and equipment of $5,993. Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended January 31, 2014 was $139,421, resulting primarily from the acquisition of mineral rights and properties of $111,800 and purchase of property, plant and equipment of $27,369.

30


Stock Options and Warrants

At January 31, 2015, the Company had stock options outstanding representing 11,069,208 common shares at a weighted-average exercise price of $1.39 per share and share purchase warrants outstanding representing 5,009,524 common shares at a weighted-average exercise price of $2.38 per share. At January 31, 2015, outstanding stock options and warrants represented a total 16,078,732 shares issuable for gross proceeds of approximately $27,268,000 should these stock options and warrants be exercised in full. At January 31, 2015, outstanding in-the-money stock options and warrants represented a total 2,513,922 common shares exercisable for gross proceeds of approximately $1,388,000 should these in-the-money stock options and warrants be exercised in full. The exercise of these stock options and warrants is at the discretion of the respective holders and, accordingly, there is no assurance that any of these stock options or warrants will be exercised in the future.

Transactions with Directors and Officers

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company incurred $33,524 and $72,658 (three and six months ended January 31, 2014: $36,237 and $73,640), respectively, in general and administrative costs paid to a company controlled by a direct family member of a director and officer. In addition, during the six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company issued 15,000 restricted shares to this company for consulting services with a fair value of $18,150 included in general and administrative costs.

During the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, the Company incurred $9,000 and $18,000, respectively, in consulting fees paid to a company controlled by a former director of the Company.

At January 31, 2015, amounts owed to related parties totaled $4,917 (July 31, 2014: $11,234). These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Material Commitments

Material commitments of the Company since the filing of the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014 have not changed, except for commitments relating to executive management services which increased by $229,000 due primarily to the appointment of an Executive Vice President in September 2014.

At January 31, 2015, we have made all scheduled payments and complied with all of the covenants under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated and effective March 13, 2014, and we expect to continue complying with all scheduled payments and covenants during our fiscal year ending July 31, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies

For a complete summary of all of our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as presented under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.

Refer to “Critical Accounting Policies” under Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.

31


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

It should be noted that any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions designed to obtain reasonable (and not absolute) assurance as to its effectiveness, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

32


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this Quarterly Report, other than as disclosed below, there are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject, and no director, officer, affiliate or record or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, or any associate or any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder, is (i) a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries in any legal proceeding or (ii) has an adverse interest to us or any of our subsidiaries in any legal proceeding. Other than as disclosed below, management is not aware of any other material legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against us or our properties.

On or about March 9, 2011, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the “TCEQ”) granted the Company’s applications for a Class III Injection Well Permit, Production Area Authorization and Aquifer Exemption for its Goliad Project. On or about December 4, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) concurred with the TCEQ issuance of the Aquifer Exemption permit (the “AE”). With the receipt of this concurrence, the final authorization required for uranium extraction, the Goliad Project achieved fully-permitted status. On or about May 24, 2011, a group of petitioners, inclusive of Goliad County, appealed the TCEQ action to the 250 th District Court in Travis County, Texas. A motion filed by the Company to intervene in this matter was granted. The petitioners’ appeal lay dormant until on or about June 14, 2013, when the petitioners filed their initial brief in support of their position. On or about January 18, 2013, a different group of petitioners, exclusive of Goliad County, filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the United States (the “Fifth Circuit”) to appeal the EPA’s decision. On or about March 5, 2013, a motion filed by the Company to intervene in this matter was granted. The parties attempted to resolve both appeals and, to facilitate discussions and to avoid further legal costs, the parties jointly agreed, through mediation which was initially conducted through the Fifth Circuit on or about August 8, 2013, to abate the proceedings in the State District Court. On or about August 21, 2013, the State District Court agreed to abate the proceedings. The EPA subsequently filed a motion to remand without vacatur with the Fifth Circuit wherein the EPA's stated purpose was to elicit additional public input and further explain its rationale for the approval. In requesting the remand without vacatur, which would allow the AE to remain in place during the review period, the EPA denied the existence of legal error and stated that it was unaware of any additional information that would merit reversal of the AE. The Company and the TCEQ filed a request to the Fifth Circuit for the motion to remand without vacatur, if granted, to be limited to a 60-day review period. On December 9, 2013, by way of a procedural order from a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit, the Court granted the remand without vacatur and initially limited the review period to 60 days. In March of 2014, at the EPA’s request, the Fifth Circuit extended the EPA’s time period for review and additionally, during that same period, the Company conducted a joint groundwater survey of the site, the result of which reaffirmed the Company’s previously filed groundwater direction studies. On or about June 17, 2014, the EPA reaffirmed its earlier decision to uphold the granting of the Company’s existing AE, with the exception of a northwestern portion containing less than 10% of the uranium resource which was withdrawn, but not denied, from the AE area until additional information is provided in the normal course of mine development. On or about September 9, 2014, the petitioners filed a status report with the State District Court which included a request to remove the stay agreed to in August 2013 and to set a briefing schedule (the “Status Report”). In that Status Report, the petitioners also stated that they had decided not to pursue their appeal at the Fifth Circuit. The Company continues to believe that the pending appeal is without merit and is continuing forward as planned towards uranium extraction at its fully-permitted Goliad Project.

On or about April 3, 2012, the Company received notification of a lawsuit filed in the State of Arizona, in the Superior Court for the County of Yavapai, by certain petitioners (the “Plaintiffs”) against a group of defendants, including the Company and former management and board members of Concentric. The lawsuit asserts certain claims relating to the Plaintiffs’ equity investments in Concentric, including allegations that the former management and board members of Concentric engaged in various wrongful acts prior to and/or in conjunction with the merger of Concentric. The lawsuit originally further alleged that the Company was contractually liable for liquidated damages arising from a pre-merger transaction which the Company previously acknowledged and recorded as an accrued liability, and which portion of the lawsuit was settled in full by a cash payment of $149,194 to the Plaintiffs and subsequently dismissed. The court dismissed several other claims set forth in the Plaintiffs’ initial complaint, but granted the Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint. The court denied a subsequent motion to dismiss the amended complaint, finding that the pleading met the minimal pleading requirements under the applicable procedural rules. In October 2013, the Company filed a formal response denying liability for any of the Plaintiffs’ remaining claims and is vigorously defending against any and all remaining claims asserted under this lawsuit. The parties have exchanged preliminary disclosure statements, and formal discovery is currently in progress. A trial date has been set for April 2016. The Company continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit, and intends to file a dispositive motion prior to the deadline set by the court.

33


Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the information contained in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014 and this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, the following list of material risks and uncertainties should be carefully reviewed by our stockholders and any potential investors in evaluating our Company, our business and the market value of our common stock. Any one of these risks and uncertainties has the potential to cause material adverse effects on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results which could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements expressed by us and a significant decrease in the market price of our common stock. Refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” as disclosed in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.

There is no assurance that we will be successful in preventing the material adverse effects that any of the following risks and uncertainties may cause, or that these potential risks and uncertainties are a complete list of the risks and uncertainties facing us. Furthermore, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that we are presently unaware of, or presently consider immaterial, that may become material in the future and have a material adverse effect on us. You could lose all or a significant portion of your investment due to any of these risks and uncertainties.

Risks Related to Our Company and Business

Evaluating our future performance may be difficult since we have a limited financial and operating history, with significant negative cash flow and accumulated deficit to date. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate additional financing, including those from asset divestitures. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing and accordingly, there is substantial doubt as to whether our existing cash resources and working capital are sufficient to enable the Company to continue its operations for the next twelve months. Furthermore, our long-term success will depend ultimately on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and to develop positive cash flow from our mining activities.

As more fully described under Item 1. Business in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014, Uranium Energy Corp. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 16, 2003 and since 2004, we have been engaged in uranium mining and related activities, including exploration, pre-extraction, extraction and processing on projects located in the United States and Paraguay. In November 2010, we commenced uranium extraction utilizing ISR for the first time at the Palangana Mine and processed those materials at the Hobson Processing Facility into drums of U 3 O 8 , our only sales product and source of revenue. We also hold uranium projects in various stages of exploration and pre-extraction in the States of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas and Wyoming and the Republic of Paraguay.

As more fully described under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” of Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations, we have a history of significant negative cash flow and accumulated deficit since inception to January 31, 2015 of $181.3 million. Although we generated revenues from sales of U 3 O 8 during Fiscal 2013 and 2012 of $9.0million and $13.8 million, respectively, we have yet to achieve profitability or develop positive cash flow from our operations. No revenues from the sale of U 3 O 8 were generatedduring the six months ended January 31, 2015 or during Fiscal 2014 or prior to Fiscal 2012. Furthermore, we do not expect to achieve and maintain profitability or develop positive cash flow from our operations in the near term. Historically, we have been reliant primarily on equity financings and, more recently, on debt financing to fund our operations and we expect this reliance to continue for the foreseeable future. As a result of our limited financial and operating history, including our significant negative cash flow and net losses to date, it may be difficult to evaluate our future performance.

At January 31, 2015, we had working capital of $5.7 million including cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate additional financing which we have successfully secured since inception, including those from asset divestitures. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing including further asset divestitures and accordingly, there is substantial doubt as to whether our existing cash resources and working capital are sufficient to enable the Company to continue its operations for the next twelve months.

34


Our long-term success, including the recoverability of the carrying values of our assets and our ability to acquire additional uranium projects and continue with exploration and pre-extraction activities and mining activities on our existing uranium projects, will depend ultimately on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow from our operations by establishing ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium and to develop these into profitable mining activities. The economic viability of our mining activities, including the expected duration and profitability of the Palangana Mine and of any future satellite ISR mines, such as the Goliad and Burke Hollow Projects, located within the South Texas Uranium Belt, has many risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant, prolonged decrease in the market price of uranium; (ii) difficulty in marketing and/or selling uranium concentrates; (iii) significantly higher than expected capital costs to construct the mine and/or processing plant; (iv) significantly higher than expected extraction costs; (v) significantly lower than expected uranium extraction; (vi) significant delays, reductions or stoppages of uranium extraction activities; and (vi) the introduction of significantly more stringent regulatory laws and regulations. Our mining activities may change as a result of any one or more of these risks and uncertainties and there is no assurance that any ore body that we extract mineralized materials from will result in achieving and maintaining profitability and developing positive cash flow.

Our operations are capital intensive, and we will require significant additional financing to acquire additional uranium projects and continue with our exploration and pre-extraction activities on our existing uranium projects. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing when required and on terms favorable to us.

Our operations are capital intensive and future capital expenditures are expected to be substantial. We will require significant additional financing to fund our operations, including continuing with our exploration and pre-extraction activities which include assaying, drilling, geological and geochemical analysis and mine construction costs. In the absence of such additional financing, we would not be able to fund our operations, including continuing with our exploration and pre-extraction activities, which may result in delays, curtailment or abandonment of any one or all of our uranium projects.

Historically, we have been reliant primarily on equity financings from the sale of our common stock and, for Fiscal 2014 and 2013, on debt financing in order to fund our operations. We have also relied on cash flows generated from our mining activities during Fiscal 2013 and 2012, however, we have yet to achieve profitability or develop positive cash flow from operations. Our reliance on equity and debt financings is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, and their availability whenever such additional financing is required, will be dependent on many factors beyond our control including, but not limited to, the market price of uranium, the continuing public support of nuclear power as a viable source of electricity generation, the volatility in the global financial markets affecting our stock price and the status of the worldwide economy, any one of which may cause significant challenges in our ability to access additional financing, including access to the equity and credit markets. We may also be required to seek other forms of financing, such as asset divestitures or joint venture arrangements to continue advancing our uranium projects which would depend entirely on finding a suitable third party willing to enter into such an arrangement, typically involving an assignment of a percentage interest in the mineral project. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing when required and on terms favorable to us.

Restrictive covenants in the credit agreement governing our indebtedness may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies.

We entered into an amended and restated credit agreement dated and effective March 13, 2014, which superseded in its entirety a prior credit agreement dated and effective July 30, 2013, which provides for a $20 million secured credit facility, pursuant to which we had drawn down $20 million in principal as of July 31, 2014. The amended and restated credit agreement includes restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to sell the assets securing our indebtedness or to incur additional indebtedness other than permitted indebtedness, which may restrict our ability to pursue certain business strategies from time to time. If we do not comply with these covenants, we could be in default which, if not addressed or waived, could require accelerated repayment of our indebtedness and/or enforcement by the lenders against certain key assets securing our indebtedness.

If we are unable to service our indebtedness, we could lose the assets securing our indebtedness.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, interest and fees, including compliance with the restrictive covenants under our amended and restated credit agreement, will be dependent on and may change as a result of our financial condition and operating performance. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default which, if not addressed or waived, could require accelerated repayment of our indebtedness and/or enforcement by the lenders against certain assets securing our indebtedness. Our amended and restated credit agreement is secured against the lease and related rights comprising the Hobson Processing Facility and the mineral and related rights comprising the Goliad Project. These are key assets on which our business is substantially dependent and as such, the enforcement against any one or all of these assets would have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

35


Our uranium extraction and sales history is limited, with our uranium extraction originating from a single uranium mine. Our ability to continue generating revenue is subject to a number of factors, any one or more of which may adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition .

We have a limited history of uranium extraction and generating revenue. In November 2010, we commenced uranium extraction at a single uranium mine, the Palangana Mine, which has been our sole source for the U 3 O 8 sold to generate our revenues of $9.0 million during Fiscal 2013 and $13.8 million during Fiscal 2012, with no revenues from the sale of U 3 O 8 generated during Fiscal 2014 or prior to Fiscal 2012. During Fiscal 2014, we announced a strategic plan to align our operations to adapt to the existing uranium market in a challenging post-Fukushima environment and as a result, uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine operated at a reduced pace, including the deferral of any further pre-extraction expenditures, to maintain operational readiness in anticipation of a recovery in uranium prices. Our ability to continue generating revenue from the Palangana Mine is subject to a number of factors which include, but are not limited to, (i) a significant, prolonged decrease in the market price of uranium; (ii) difficulty in marketing and/or selling uranium concentrates; (iii) significantly higher than expected capital costs to construct the mine and/or processing plant; (iv) significantly higher than expected extraction costs; (v) significantly lower than expected uranium extraction; (vi) significant delays, reductions or stoppages of uranium extraction activities; and (vii) the introduction of significantly more stringent regulatory laws and regulations. Furthermore, continued mining activities at the Palangana Mine will eventually deplete the Palangana Mine or become uneconomical, and if we are unable to directly acquire or develop our existing uranium projects, such as the Goliad and Burke Hollow Projects, into additional uranium mines from which we can commence uranium extraction, it will negatively impact our ability to continue generating revenues. Any one or more of these occurrences may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Uranium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are inherently subject to numerous significant risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ significantly from expectations or anticipated amounts. Furthermore, exploration programs conducted on our uranium projects may not result in the establishment of ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium.

Uranium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are inherently subject to numerous significant risks and uncertainties, many beyond our control, including, but not limited to: (i) unanticipated ground and water conditions and adverse claims to water rights; (ii) unusual or unexpected geological formations; (iii) metallurgical and other processing problems; (iv) the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions and other force majeure events; (v) lower than expected ore grades; (vi) industrial accidents; (vii) delays in the receipt of or failure to receive necessary government permits; (viii) delays in transportation; (ix) availability of contractors and labor; (x) government permit restrictions and regulation restrictions; (xi) unavailability of materials and equipment; and (xii) the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations. These risks and uncertainties could result in: delays, reductions or stoppages in our mining activities; increased capital and/or extraction costs; damage to, or destruction of, our mineral projects, extraction facilities or other properties; personal injuries; environmental damage; monetary losses; and legal claims.

Success in uranium exploration is dependent on many factors, including, without limitation, the experience and capabilities of a company’s management, the availability of geological expertise and the availability of sufficient funds to conduct the exploration program. Even if an exploration program is successful and commercially recoverable uranium is established, it may take a number of years from the initial phases of drilling and identification of the mineralization until extraction is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of extraction may change such that the uranium ceases to be economically recoverable. Uranium exploration is frequently non-productive due, for example, to poor exploration results or the inability to establish ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium, in which case the uranium project may be abandoned and written-off. Furthermore, we will not be able to benefit from our exploration efforts and recover the expenditures that we incur on our exploration programs if we do not establish ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium and develop these uranium projects into profitable mining activities, and there is no assurance that we will be successful in doing so for any of our uranium projects.

36


Whether an ore body contains commercially recoverable uranium depends on many factors including, without limitation: (i) the particular attributes, including material changes to those attributes, of the deposit such as size, grade, recovery rates and proximity to infrastructure; (ii) the market price of uranium, which may be volatile; and (iii) government regulations and regulatory requirements including, without limitation, those relating to environmental protection, permitting and land use, taxes, land tenure and transportation.

We have not established proven or probable reserves through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for any of our uranium projects, including the Palangana Mine. Furthermore, we have no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our uranium projects for which we plan on utilizing ISR mining, such as the Palangana Mine. Since we commenced extraction of mineralized materials from the Palangana Mine without having established proven or probable reserves, it may result in our mining activities at the Palangana Mine, and at any future uranium projects for which proven or probable reserves are not established, being inherently riskier than other mining activities for which proven or probable reserves have been established.

We have established the existence of mineralized materials for certain uranium projects, including the Palangana Mine. We have not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for any of our uranium projects, including the Palangana Mine. Furthermore, we have no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our uranium projects for which we plan on utilizing ISR mining, such as the Palangana Mine. Since we commenced uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine without having established proven or probable reserves, there may be greater inherent uncertainty as to whether or not any mineralized material can be economically extracted as originally planned and anticipated. Any mineralized materials established or extracted from the Palangana Mine should not in any way be associated with having established or produced from proven or probable reserves.

Since we are in the Exploration Stage, pre-production expenditures including those related to pre-extraction activities are expensed as incurred, the effects of which may result in our consolidated financial statements not being directly comparable to the financial statements of companies in the Production Stage.

Despite the fact that we commenced uranium extraction at the Palangana Mine in November 2010, we remain in the Exploration Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7, and will continue to remain in the Exploration Stage until such time proven or probable reserves have been established, which may never occur. We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) under which acquisition costs of mineral rights are initially capitalized as incurred while pre-production expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time we exit the Exploration Stage. Expenditures relating to exploration activities are expensed as incurred and expenditures relating to pre-extraction activities are expensed as incurred until such time proven or probable reserves are established for that uranium project, after which subsequent expenditures relating to mine development activities for that particular project are capitalized as incurred.

We have neither established nor have any plans to establish proven or probable reserves for our uranium projects for which we plan on utilizing ISR mining, such as the Palangana Mine. Companies in the Production Stage as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, having established proven and probable reserves and exited the Exploration Stage, typically capitalize expenditures relating to ongoing development activities, with corresponding depletion calculated over proven and probable reserves using the units-of-production method and allocated to future reporting periods to inventory and, as that inventory is sold, to cost of goods sold. As we are in the Exploration Stage, it has resulted in us reporting larger losses than if we had been in the Production Stage due to the expensing, instead of capitalization, of expenditures relating to ongoing mill and mine pre-extraction activities. Additionally, there would be no corresponding amortization allocated to our future reporting periods since those costs would have been expensed previously, resulting in both lower inventory costs and cost of goods sold and results of operations with higher gross profits and lower losses than if we had been in the Production Stage. Any capitalized costs, such as acquisition costs of mineral rights, are depleted over the estimated extraction life using the straight-line method. As a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be directly comparable to the financial statements of companies in the Production Stage.

We have recorded estimated reclamation obligations relating to our uranium projects which may be exceeded by the actual reclamation costs when incurred in the future.

37


We are responsible for certain reclamation obligations in the future, primarily for the Hobson Processing Facility and the Palangana Mine, and have recorded a liability on our balance sheet to recognize such estimated reclamation costs. There is a risk, however, that the actual reclamation costs when incurred in the future will exceed the estimated amounts recorded, which will adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance.

We do not insure against all of the risks we face in our operations.

In general, where coverage is available and not prohibitively expensive relative to the perceived risk, we will maintain insurance against such risk, subject to exclusions and limitations. We currently maintain insurance against general commercial liability claims and certain physical assets used in our operations, subject to exclusions and limitations, however, we do not maintain insurance to cover all of the potential risks and hazards associated with our operations. We may be subject to liability for environmental, pollution or other hazards associated with our exploration, pre-extraction and extraction activities, which we may not be insured against, which may exceed the limits of our insurance coverage or which we may elect not to insure against because of high premiums or other reasons. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that any insurance coverage we currently have will continue to be available at reasonable premiums or that such insurance will adequately cover any resulting liability.

Acquisitions that we may make from time to time could have an adverse impact on us.

From time to time, we examine opportunities to acquire additional mining assets and businesses. Any acquisition that we may choose to complete may be of a significant size, may change the scale of our business and operations, and may expose us to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks. Our success in our acquisition activities depends on our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition, and integrate the acquired operations successfully with those of our Company. Any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks which could have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, there may be a significant change in commodity prices after we have committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio; a material ore body may prove to be below expectations; we may have difficulty integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization; the integration of the acquired business or assets may disrupt our ongoing business and our relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and contractors; and the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant. In the event that we choose to raise debt capital to finance any such acquisition, our leverage will be increased. If we choose to use equity as consideration for such acquisition, existing shareholders may suffer dilution. Alternatively, we may choose to finance any such acquisition with our existing resources. There can be no assurance that we would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

The uranium industry is subject to numerous stringent laws, regulations and standards, including environmental protection laws and regulations. If any changes occur that would make these laws, regulations and standards more stringent, it may require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated or cause substantial delays, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Uranium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are subject to numerous stringent laws, regulations and standards at the federal, state, and local levels governing permitting, pre-extraction, extraction, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection and reclamation of the environment, protection of endangered and protected species, mine safety, hazardous substances and other matters. Our compliance with these requirements requires significant financial and personnel resources.

The laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any government body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction, may change or be applied or interpreted in a manner which may also have a material adverse effect on our operations. The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body or regulatory agency or special interest group, may also have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Uranium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are subject to stringent environmental protection laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local levels. These laws and regulations, which include permitting and reclamation requirements, regulate emissions, water storage and discharges and disposal of hazardous wastes. Uranium mining activities are also subject to laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of mining methods. Various permits from governmental and regulatory bodies are required for mining to commence or continue, and no assurance can be provided that required permits will be received in a timely manner.

38


Our compliance costs including the posting of surety bonds associated with environmental protection laws and regulations and health and safety standards have been significant to date, and are expected to increase in scale and scope as we expand our operations in the future. Furthermore, environmental protection laws and regulations may become more stringent in the future, and compliance with such changes may require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated or cause substantial delays, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations.

To the best of our knowledge, our operations are in compliance, in all material respects, with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. If we become subject to liability for any violations, we may not be able or may elect not to insure against such risk due to high insurance premiums or other reasons. Where coverage is available and not prohibitively expensive relative to the perceived risk, we will maintain insurance against such risk, subject to exclusions and limitations. However, we cannot provide any assurance that such insurance will continue to be available at reasonable premiums or that such insurance will be adequate to cover any resulting liability.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain necessary licenses.

Our exploration and mining activities are dependent upon the grant of appropriate authorizations, licences, permits and consents, as well as continuation of these authorizations, licences, permits and consents already granted, which may be granted for a defined period of time, or may not be granted or may be withdrawn or made subject to limitations. There can be no assurance that all necessary authorizations, licences, permits and consents will be granted to us, or that authorizations, licences, permits and consents already granted will not be withdrawn or made subject to limitations.

Major nuclear incidents may have adverse effects on the nuclear and uranium industries.

The nuclear incident that occurred in Japan in March 2011 had significant and adverse effects on both the nuclear and uranium industries. If another nuclear incident were to occur, it may have further adverse effects for both industries. Public opinion of nuclear power as a source of electricity generation may be adversely affected, which may cause governments of certain countries to further increase regulation for the nuclear industry, reduce or abandon current reliance on nuclear power or reduce or abandon existing plans for nuclear power expansion. Any one of these occurrences has the potential to reduce current and/or future demand for nuclear power, resulting in lower demand for uranium and lower market prices for uranium, adversely affecting the Company’s operations and prospects. Furthermore, the growth of the nuclear and uranium industries is dependent on continuing and growing public support of nuclear power as a viable source of electricity generation.

The marketability of uranium concentrates will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control which may result in our inability to receive an adequate return on our invested capital.

The marketability of uranium concentrates extracted by us will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include macroeconomic factors, fluctuations in the market price of uranium, governmental regulations, land tenure and use, regulations concerning the importing and exporting of uranium and environmental protection regulations. The future effects of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but any one or a combination of these factors may result in our inability to receive an adequate return on our invested capital.

The uranium industry is highly competitive and we may not be successful in acquiring additional projects.

The uranium industry is highly competitive, and our competition includes larger, more established companies with longer operating histories that not only explore for and produce uranium, but also market uranium and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. Due to their greater financial and technical resources, we may not be able to acquire additional uranium projects in a competitive bidding process involving such companies. Additionally, these larger companies have greater resources to continue with their operations during periods of depressed market conditions.

We hold mineral rights in foreign jurisdictions which could be subject to additional risks due to political, taxation, economic and cultural factors.

39


We hold certain mineral rights located in Paraguay through the acquisition of Piedra Rica Mining S.A. and Transandes Paraguay S.A., both companies incorporated in Paraguay. Operations in foreign jurisdictions outside of the U.S. and Canada, especially in developing countries, may be subject to additional risks as they may have different political, regulatory, taxation, economic and cultural environments that may adversely affect the value or continued viability of our rights. These additional risks include, but are not limited to: (i) changes in governments or senior government officials; (ii) changes to existing laws or policies on foreign investments, environmental protection, mining and ownership of mineral interests; (iii) renegotiation, cancellation, expropriation and nationalization of existing permits or contracts; (iv) foreign currency controls and fluctuations; and (v) civil disturbances, terrorism and war.

In the event of a dispute arising at our foreign operations in Paraguay, we may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of the courts in the United States or Canada. We may also be hindered or prevented from enforcing our rights with respect to a government entity or instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Any adverse or arbitrary decision of a foreign court may have a material and adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

There is no guarantee that title to our mineral property interests will not be challenged.

Although we have taken reasonable measures to ensure proper title to our interests in mineral properties and other assets, there is no guarantee that the title to any of such interests will not be challenged. No assurance can be given that we will be able to secure the grant or the renewal of existing mineral rights and tenures on terms satisfactory to us, or that governments in the jurisdictions in which we operate will not revoke or significantly alter such rights or tenures or that such rights or tenures will not be challenged or impugned by third parties, including local governments, aboriginal peoples or other claimants. Our mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. A successful challenge to the precise area and location of our claims could result in us being unable to operate on our properties as permitted or being unable to enforce our rights with respect to our properties.

Due to the nature of our business, we may be subject to legal proceedings which may divert management’s time and attention from our business and result in substantial damage awards.

Due to the nature of our business, we may be subject to numerous regulatory investigations, civil claims, lawsuits and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business including those described under Item 1. Legal Proceedings. No reserves have been established for any potential liability relating to these lawsuits. The outcome of these lawsuits is uncertain and subject to inherent uncertainties, and the actual costs to be incurred will depend upon many unknown factors. We may be forced to expend significant resources in the defense of these suits, and we may not prevail. Defending against these and other lawsuits in the future may not only require us to incur significant legal fees and expenses, but may become time-consuming for us and detract from our ability to fully focus our internal resources on our business activities. The results of any legal proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty due to the uncertainty inherent in litigation, the difficulty of predicting decisions of regulators, judges and juries and the possibility that decisions may be reversed on appeal. There can be no assurances that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial position.

We depend on certain key personnel, and our success will depend on our continued ability to retain and attract such qualified personnel.

Our success is dependent on the efforts, abilities and continued service of certain senior officers and key employees and consultants. A number of our key employees and consultants have significant experience in the uranium industry. A loss of service from any one of these individuals may adversely affect our operations, and we may have difficulty or may not be able to locate and hire a suitable replacement.

Certain directors and officers may be subject to conflicts of interest.

The majority of our directors and officers are involved in other business ventures including similar capacities with other private or publicly-traded companies. Such individuals may have significant responsibilities to these other business ventures, including consulting relationships, which may require significant amounts of their available time. Conflicts of interest may include decisions on how much time to devote to our business affairs and what business opportunities should be presented to us. Our Code of Business Conduct for Directors, Officers and Employees provides for guidance on conflicts of interest.

40


The laws of the State of Nevada and our Articles of Incorporation may protect our directors and officers from certain types of lawsuits.

The laws of the State of Nevada provide that our directors and officers will not be liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as directors and officers of the Company. Our Bylaws provide for broad indemnification powers to all persons against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. These indemnification provisions may require us to use our limited assets to defend our directors and officers against claims, and may have the effect of preventing stockholders from recovering damages against our directors and officers caused by their negligence, poor judgment or other circumstances.

Several of our directors and officers are residents outside of the U.S., and it may be difficult for stockholders to enforce within the U.S. any judgments obtained against such directors or officers.

Several of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the U.S., and all or a substantial portion of such persons' assets are located outside of the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process on such directors and officers, or enforce within the U.S. any judgments obtained against such directors and officers, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S. or any state thereof. Consequently, stockholders may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies against such directors and officers under U.S. federal securities laws. In addition, stockholders may not be able to commence an action in a Canadian court predicated upon the civil liability provisions under U.S. federal securities laws. The foregoing risks also apply to those experts identified in this document that are not residents of the U.S.

Disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed and operated, are designed to obtain reasonable, and not absolute, assurance as to its reliability and effectiveness.

Management’s evaluation on the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures is designed to ensure that information required for disclosure in our public filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis to our senior management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized, assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use and transactions are properly recorded and reported. Any system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, is based in part upon certain assumptions designed to obtain reasonable, and not absolute, assurance as to its reliability and effectiveness.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Historically, the market price of our common stock has been and may continue to fluctuate significantly.

On September 28, 2007, our common stock commenced trading on the NYSE MKT Equities Exchange (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange and the NYSE Amex Equities Exchange) and prior to that, traded on the OTC Bulletin Board.

The global markets have experienced significant and increased volatility in the past, and have been impacted by the effects of mass sub-prime mortgage defaults and liquidity problems of the asset-backed commercial paper market, resulting in a number of large financial institutions requiring government bailouts or filing for bankruptcy. The effects of these past events and any similar events in the future may continue to or further affect the global markets, which may directly affect the market price of our common stock and our accessibility for additional financing. Although this volatility may be unrelated to specific company performance, it can have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares which, historically, has fluctuated significantly and may continue to do so in the future.

In addition to the volatility associated with general economic trends and market conditions, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly due to the impact of any one or more events, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) volatility in the uranium market; (ii) occurrence of a major nuclear incident such as the events in Fukushima in March 2011; (iii) changes in the outlook for the nuclear power and uranium industries; (iv) failure to meet market expectations on our exploration, pre-extraction or extraction activities, including abandonment of key uranium projects; (v) sales of a large number of our shares held by certain stockholders including institutions and insiders; (vi) downward revisions to previous estimates on us by analysts; (vii) removal from market indices; (viii) legal claims brought forth against us; and (ix) introduction of technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies.

41


A prolonged decline in the market price of our common stock could affect our ability to obtain additional financing which would adversely affect our operations.

Historically, we have relied on equity financing and more recently, on debt financing, as primary sources of financing. A prolonged decline in the market price of our common stock or a reduction in our accessibility to the global markets may result in our inability to secure additional financing which would have an adverse effect on our operations.

Additional issuances of our common stock may result in significant dilution to our existing shareholders and reduce the market value of their investment.

We are authorized to issue 750,000,000 shares of common stock of which 91,891,620 shares were issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2015. Future issuances for financings, mergers and acquisitions, exercise of stock options and share purchase warrants and for other reasons may result in significant dilution to and be issued at prices substantially below the price paid for our shares held by our existing stockholders. Significant dilution would reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power held by our existing stockholders, and may result in a decrease in the market price of our shares.

We filed a Form S-3 “Shelf” Registration Statement, which was declared effective on January 10, 2014. This “Shelf” Registration Statement provides for the public offer and sale of certain securities of the Company from time to time, at our discretion, up to an aggregate offering amount of $100 million.

We are subject to the Continued Listing Criteria of the NYSE MKT and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of our common stock .

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE MKT. In order to maintain this listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to these objective standards, the NYSE MKT may delist the securities of any issuer if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE MKT inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE MKT’s listing requirements; if an issuer’s common stock sells at what the NYSE MKT considers a “low selling price” and the issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE MKT; or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE MKT, in its opinion, inadvisable.

If the NYSE MKT delists our common stock, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During our fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2015, we issued the following securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”):

  • On November 4, 2014, December 4, 2014 and January 2, 2015, we issued 7,500 shares of restricted common stock, 7,500 shares of restricted common stock and 7,500 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, to a consultant at a deemed issuance price of $1.35 per share in consideration for services under a consulting agreement. We relied on exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act provided by Regulation S and/or Section 4(a)(2) with respect to the issuance of these shares.
  • On November 21, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 75,000 restricted common shares to two consultants at a deemed issuance price of $1.90 per share in consideration for services under consulting agreements. We relied on exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act provided by Regulation S and/or Section 4(a)(2) for one of the consultants and by Rule 506 of Regulation D and/or Section 4(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act with respect to the other consultant.

42


  • On November 21, 2014 and December 19, 2014, we issued 70,000 shares of restricted common stock and 55,000 shares of common stock, respectively, to a consultant at a deemed issuance price of $1.15 per share in consideration for services under a consulting agreement. We relied on exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act provided by Regulation S and/or Section 4(a) (2) with respect to the issuance of these shares.
  • On November 27, 2014 and December 26, 2014, we issued 23,365 shares of restricted common stock and 23,365 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, to a consultant at a deemed issuance price of $1.07 per share in consideration for services under a consulting agreement. We relied on exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act provided by Regulation S and/or Section 4(a)(2) with respect to the issuance of these shares.
  • On December 5, 2014 and January 5, 2015, we issued 11,111 shares of restricted common stock and 11,111 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, to a consultant at a deemed issuance price of $1.87 per share in consideration for services under a consulting agreement. We relied on exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D and/or Section 4(a) (2) with respect to the issuance of these shares.
  • On December 19, 2014, we issued 5,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant at a deemed issuance price of $1.20 per share in consideration for services under a consulting agreement. We relied on exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act provided by Regulation S and/or Section 4(a)(2) with respect to the issuance of these shares.

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States, and that is subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“Mine Safety Act”), are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. During the quarter ended January 31, 2015, the Company’s Palangana Mine was not subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Mine Safety Act.

Item 5.     Other Information

None.

Item 6.     Exhibits

The following exhibits are included with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

Exhibit Description of Exhibit
10.1 Executive Services Agreement between Uranium Energy Corp. and Scott Melbye, executed December 15, 2014.
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).
32.1 Certifications pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

43


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
   
By: /s/ Amir Adnani
  Amir Adnani
  President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
  Executive Officer) and Director
  Date: March 11, 2015
   
By: /s/ Mark Katsumata
  Mark Katsumata
  Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial Officer)
  Date: March 11, 2015

44



 

 

 
EXECUTIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
 

 

 

Between :

URANIUM ENERGY CORP.

 

And :

SCOTT MELBYE

 

 

 

Uranium Energy Corp.
500 North Shoreline, Ste. 800N, Corpus Christi, Texas, U.S.A., 78471
__________



EXECUTIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

THIS EXECUTIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT is made and dated for reference effective as at September 1, 2014, as executed on this 15th day of December, 2014.

BETWEEN :

URANIUM ENERGY CORP. , a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, U.S.A., and having an executive office and an address for notice and delivery located at 500 North Shoreline, Ste. 800N, Corpus Christi, Texas, U.S.A., 78471

(the “ Company ”);

OF THE FIRST PART

AND :

SCOTT MELBYE , an individual, having an address for notice and delivery located at 8055 E. Tuffs Avenue, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., 80237

(the “ Executive ”);

OF THE SECOND PART

(the Company and the Executive being hereinafter singularly also referred to as a “ Party ” and collectively referred to as the “ Parties ” as the context so requires).

WHEREAS :

A.           The Company is a reporting company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, U.S.A., and has its common shares listed for trading on the NYSE MKT LLC stock exchange;

B.           The Executive has experience in and specializes in providing reporting and non-reporting companies with valuable management and operational services, and the Executive is the current Executive Vice President of the Company;

C.           The Company is involved in the principal business of acquiring, exploring and developing various uranium and other resource properties of merit (collectively, the “ Business ”); and, as a consequence thereof, the Company is hereby desirous of continuing to retain the Executive as its Executive Vice President and the Executive is hereby desirous of accepting such position and providing related services to the Company as set forth in this Executive Services Agreement (the “ Agreement ”);

D.           In accordance with the terms and conditions of a certain and underlying letter agreement, dated for reference effective as of August 28, 2014, as entered into between the Parties, a copy of which letter agreement being attached hereto as Schedule “A” (the “ Underlying Agreement ”); the Parties thereby formalized the appointment of the Executive as an employee of the Company together with the provision for certain related management and operational services to be provided by the Executive to the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Underlying Agreement and, particular, in the Executive’s then intended role as the Executive Vice President of the Company; and


- 2 -

E.           Since the entering into of the Underlying Agreement, and as contemplated by the terms of the Underlying Agreement, the Parties have discussed the terms and conditions of the services that would continue to be provided by the Executive to the Company and, by entering into this Agreement, the Parties have agreed to hereby replace, in their entirety, the Underlying Agreement, together with all such prior discussions, negotiations, understandings and agreements with respect to the services, all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that, in consideration of the mutual covenants and provisos herein contained, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS :

Article 1
DEFINITIONS, INTERPRETATION, SCHEDULE AND ENTIRE AGREEMENT

1.1          Definitions . For all purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:

  (a)

Agreement ” means this Executive Services Agreement as may be from time to time supplemented or amended by one or more agreements entered into by the Parties pursuant to the applicable provisions hereof, together with any Schedules attached hereto;

     
  (b)

Arbitration Rules ” means the Rules of the American Arbitration Association, as may be amended from time to time;

     
  (c)

Benefits ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.8” hereinbelow;

     
  (d)

Board of Directors ” means the Board of Directors of the Company as duly constituted from time to time;

     
  (e)

Bonus ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.3” hereinbelow;

     
  (f)

Business ” has the meaning ascribed to it in recital “C.” hereinabove;

     
  (g)

Business Day ” means any day during which United States Chartered Banks are open for business in the City of Corpus Christi, State of Texas, U.S.A.;

     
  (h)

Company ” means Uranium Energy Corp., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, U.S.A., or any successor company, however formed, whether as a result of merger, amalgamation or other action;

     
  (i)

Company’s Non-Renewal Notice ” has the meaning ascribed to in section “3.2” hereinbelow;

     
  (j)

Effective Date ” has the meaning ascribed to in section “3.1” hereinbelow;



- 3 -

  (k)

Effective Termination Date ” has the meaning ascribed to it in sections “3.2”, “3.3”, “3.4”, “3.5”, “3.6” and “5.3” hereinbelow, as the case may be;

     
  (l)

Exchange Act ”, “ Form S-8 Registration Statement ”, “ SEC ”, “ Registration Statement ” and “ Securities Act ” have the meanings ascribed to them in section “4.7” hereinbelow;

     
  (m)

Executive ” means Scott Melbye, an individual;

     
  (n)

Expenses ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.5” hereinbelow;

     
  (o)

Fee ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.1” hereinbelow;

     
  (p)

General Services ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “2.1” hereinbelow;

     
  (q)

Initial Term ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “3.1” hereinbelow;

     
  (r)

Just Cause ” means any of the following acts, omissions, behavior, or conduct of the Executive: (i) the substantial neglect or inattention by the Executive of the Executive’s duties under this Agreement, which breach is materially injurious to the Company; (ii) the commission of an act of fraud, conversion, misappropriation, or embezzlement or any other commission or act by the Executive, where such commission or act is punishable by imprisonment, or the Executive’s conviction of or entering a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to a felony or the equivalent thereof; or (iii) the engaging by the Executive in conduct that is materially detrimental to the reputation, character or standing or otherwise materially injurious to the Company;

     
  (s)

Indemnified Party ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “7.1” hereinbelow;

     
  (t)

Notice of Termination ” has the meaning ascribed to it in each of sections “3.3”, “3.4” and “5.3” hereinbelow;

     
  (u)

NYSE MKT ” means the NYSE MKT LLC stock exchange, or any successor stock exchange, however formed, whether as a result of merger, amalgamation or other action;

     
  (v)

Option ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.6” hereinbelow;

     
  (w)

Option Plan ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.6” hereinbelow;

     
  (x)

Option Share ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.6” hereinbelow;

     
  (y)

Outstanding Expense Reimbursements ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “3.2” hereinbelow;

     
  (z)

Outstanding Vacation Pay ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “3.2” hereinbelow;

     
  (aa)

Parties ” or “ Party ” means, individually and collectively, the Company, and/or the Executive, as the context so requires, together with each of their respective successors and permitted assigns as the context so requires;



- 4 -

  (ab) Property ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “5.4” hereinbelow;
     
(ac) Regulatory Approval ” means the acceptance for filing, if required, of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement by the Regulatory Authorities;
     
(ad) Regulatory Authorities ” and “ Regulatory Authority ” means, either singularly or collectively as the context so requires, such regulatory agencies who have jurisdiction over the affairs of either of the Company and/or the Executive and including, without limitation, and where applicable, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the NYSE MKT and all regulatory authorities from whom any such authorization, approval or other action is required to be obtained or to be made in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
     
  (ae) Renewal Period ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “3.2” hereinbelow;
     
  (af) Severance Package ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “3.2”
    hereinbelow;
     
(ag) subsidiary ” means any company or companies of which more than 50% of the outstanding shares carrying votes at all times (provided that the ownership of such shares confers the right at all times to elect at least a majority of the directors of such company or companies) are for the time being owned by or held for that company and/or any other company in like relation to that company and includes any company in like relation to the subsidiary;
     
(ah) Underlying Agreement ” has the meaning ascribed to it in recital “D.” hereinabove; and
     
  (ai) Vacation ” has the meaning ascribed to it in section “4.5” hereinbelow.

1.2          Interpretation . For the purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise
expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires:

  (a)

the words “ herein ”, “ hereof ” and “ hereunder ” and other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article, section or other subdivision of this Agreement;

     
  (b)

any reference to an entity shall include and shall be deemed to be a reference to any entity that is a permitted successor to such entity; and

     
  (c)

words in the singular include the plural and words in the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter genders, and vice versa .

1.3          Schedule . For the purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires, the following shall represent the Schedule which is attached to this Agreement and which forms a material part hereof:

  Schedule Description of Schedule
     
  Schedule “A”: Underlying Agreement.

1.4          Entire agreement . This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement to date between the Parties and supersedes every previous agreement, communication, expectation, negotiation, representation or understanding, whether oral or written, express or implied, statutory or otherwise, between the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and including, without limitation, the Underlying Agreement which is hereby confirmed s superseded, in its entirety, by the terms and conditions of this Agreement.


- 5 -

Article 2
GENERAL SERVICES AND DUTIES OF THE EXECUTIVE

2.1          General Services . During the Initial Term and any Renewal Period the Company hereby agrees to retain the Executive as the Executive Vice President of the Company, and the Executive hereby agrees to be subject to the direction and supervision of, and to have the authority as is delegated to the Executive by, the Board of Directors consistent with such position, and the Executive also agrees to accept such position in order to provide such related management and operational services as the Board of Directors shall, from time to time, reasonably assign to the Executive and as may be necessary for the ongoing maintenance and development of the Company’s various Business interests during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period (collectively, the “ General Services ”); it being expressly acknowledged and agreed by the Parties that the Executive shall initially commit and provide to the Company the General Services on a reasonably full-time basis during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period for which the Company, as more particularly set forth hereinbelow, hereby agrees to pay and provide to the order and direction of the Executive each of the proposed compensation amounts as set forth in Articles “4” hereinbelow.

In this regard it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Executive shall be entitled to communicate with and shall rely upon the immediate advice, direction and instructions of the President of the Company, or upon the advice or instructions of such other director or officer of the Company as the President of the Company shall, from time to time, designate in times of the President’s absence, in order to initiate, coordinate and implement the General Services as contemplated herein subject, at all times, to the final direction and supervision of the Board of Directors.

2.2          Adherence to rules and policies of the Company . The Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees to abide by the reasonable rules, regulations, instructions, personnel practices and policies of the Company and any changes therein which may be adopted from time to time by the same as such rules, regulations, instructions, personnel practices and policies may be reasonably applied to the Executive as an executive officer and an employee of the Company.

Article 3
INITIAL TERM, RENEWAL AND TERMINATION

3.1          Effectiveness and Initial Term of the Agreement . The initial term of this Agreement begins on September 1, 2014 (the “ Effective Date ”) and ends on February 28, 2016 (the “ Initial Term ”; that being 18 months from the Effective Date); provided, however, that the commencement and continuation of the Initial Term is subject, at all times, to the Company’s receipt, if required, of Regulatory Approval from each of the Regulatory Authorities within 10 calendar days of the due and complete execution of this Agreement by both Parties. If said Regulatory Approval is required and not obtained within such timeframe, then this Agreement will automatically terminate and be deemed null and void ab initio .

3.2          Renewal by the Company after the Initial Term and Severance Package if not renewed . Subject at all times to sections “3.3”, “3.4”, “3.5”, “3.6” and “5.3” hereinbelow, this Agreement shall renew automatically if not specifically terminated in accordance with the following provisions. If the Company intends to not renew this Agreement, whether at the end of the Initial Term or any Renewal Period, then the Company will provide written notice to the Executive (a “ Company’s Non-Renewal Notice ”) at least 30 calendar days prior to the end of the Initial Term or the Renewal Period, as applicable. If the Company fails to provide a Company’s Non-Renewal Notice at the end of the Initial Term, then this Agreement shall automatically renew on a one-month to one-month term renewal basis after the Initial Term, or for such other period as agreed to by the Parties at that time (any such renewal period, a “ Renewal Period ”), until terminated by the Company by delivery of a Company’s Non-Renewal Notice as provided hereinabove. Any such Renewal Period will be on the same terms and conditions contained herein unless such terms are modified and agreed to in writing by the Parties in advance.


- 6 -

Following delivery of a Company’s Non-Renewal Notice that has been provided at least 30 calendar days prior to the end of the Initial Term or Renewal Period as the case may be (in such case, the day immediately following the final day of such Initial Term or Renewal Period, as applicable, being the “ Effective Termination Date ”), (i) the Executive will continue to provide the General Services until the Effective Termination Date and (ii) the Company will continue to provide and pay to the Executive all of the amounts otherwise payable to the Executive under Article “4” hereinbelow until the Effective Termination Date. In addition to the payment of such amounts by the Company, the Company shall also pay and provide to the Executive the following amounts and in the following manner (collectively, the “ Severance Package ”), subject, at all times, to the Executive’s ongoing material compliance with the Executive’s obligations under Article “5” hereinbelow, such ongoing Severance Package compensation representing the Executive’s clear and unequivocal severance package for the non-renewal of this Agreement by the Company upon the completion of the Initial Term or any Renewal Period:

  (a)

any Fees and Bonuses payable by the Company to the Executive under Article “4” hereinbelow until the Effective Termination Date and payable within 14 calendar days of the Effective Termination Date (the “ Outstanding Fees and Bonuses ”);

     
  (b)

any Expense payment reimbursements which would then be due and owing by the Company to the Executive under this Agreement to the Effective Termination Date and, subject to the Executive’s prior compliance with the provisions of section “4.5” hereinbelow, payable within 14 calendar days of the Effective Termination Date (the “ Outstanding Expense Reimbursements ”);

     
  (c)

any pro rata and unused Vacation pay which would then be due and owing by the Company to the Executive under this Agreement to the Effective Termination Date and payable within 14 calendar days of the Effective Termination Date (the “ Outstanding Vacation Pay ”);

     
  (d)

subject to the provisions of sections “4.6” and “4.7” hereinbelow, all of the Executive’s then unvested stock Options, together with any other options or equity awards granted by the Company to the Executive as of the Effective Termination Date, shall immediately vest; such that any such stock Options, options and equity awards are then fully and immediately exercisable by the Executive; and shall continue to be exercisable for a period of 90 calendar days from the Effective Termination Date (the “ Options Extension ”); and



- 7 -

  (e)

confirmation that all of the Executive’s then Benefits coverage would be extended to the Executive for a period ending 90 calendar days from the Effective Termination Date.

3.3          Termination without Just Cause by the Company and Severance Package . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by the Company without Just Cause at any time during the Initial Term or any Renewal Period by the Company’s delivery to the Executive of written notice of its intention to terminate (the “ Notice of Termination ” herein). In such case, the “ Effective Termination Date ” being the later of the date specified in the Notice of Termination and the date that is 30 calendar days after the date of delivery of such Notice of Termination. In any such event (i) the Executive will continue to provide the General Services until the Effective Termination Date and (ii) the Company will, subject to the Executive’s ongoing material compliance with the Executive’s obligations under Article “5” hereinbelow, continue to provide and pay to the Executive:

  (a)

the entire Severance Package in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in section “3.2” hereinabove; and

     
  (b)

an additional severance cash payment equating to any Fees that would be due and owing by the Company to the Executive to the end of, respectively, either the Initial Term or any then Renewal Period within which the Notice of Termination above is provided;

such ongoing compensation representing the Executive’s clear and unequivocal severance package for the early termination by the Company without Just Cause under this Agreement prior to the completion of the Initial Term or any Renewal Period.

3.4          Termination by the Executive and Severance Package . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by the Executive for any reason at any time during the Initial Term or any Renewal Period by the Executive’s delivery to the Company of written notice of its intention to terminate (the “ Notice of Termination ” herein). In such case, the “ Effective Termination Date ” being the later of the date specified in the Notice of Termination and the date that is 30 calendar days after the date of delivery of such Notice of Termination. In any such event (i) the Executive will continue to provide the General Services until the Effective Termination Date and (ii) the Company will, subject to the Executive’s ongoing material compliance with the Executive’s obligations under Article “5” hereinbelow, continue to provide and pay to the Executive:

  (a)

the Outstanding Fees and Bonuses in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(a)” hereinabove;

     
  (b)

the Outstanding Expense Reimbursements in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(b)” hereinabove;

     
  (c)

the Outstanding Vacation Pay in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(c)” hereinabove; and

     
  (d)

subject to the provisions of sections “4.6” and “4.7” hereinbelow, all of the Executive’s then unvested stock Options (as hereinafter defined), together with any other unvested options or equity awards granted by the Company to the Executive as of the Effective Termination Date, shall immediately terminate; such that any then only vested Options, options and equity awards are then fully and immediately exercisable by the Executive for a period of 90 calendar days from the Effective Termination Date;



- 8 -

such ongoing compensation representing the Executive’s clear and unequivocal severance package for the early termination by the Executive under this Agreement prior to the completion of the Initial Term or any Renewal Period; it being acknowledged and agreed that all Benefits will immediately terminate on such Effective Termination Date.

3.5          Termination for disability or death and Severance Package . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement will automatically terminate during the Initial Term or any Renewal Period on the date that is 30 calendar days after either the date of death or disability of the Executive (in such case, that date being the “ Effective Termination Date ”). For purposes of this Agreement, the term “ disability ” means that the Executive shall have been unable to provide the General Services contemplated under this Agreement for a period of 30 calendar days, whether or not consecutive, during any 360 calendar day period, due to a physical or mental disability. A determination of disability shall be made by a physician satisfactory to both the Executive and the Company; provided that if the Executive and the Company do not agree on a physician, the Executive and the Company shall each select a physician and those two physicians together shall select a third physician whose determination as to disability shall be binding on all Parties. In the event that this Agreement is terminated as a result of the Executive’s death or disability pursuant to this section, the Company will, subject to the Executive’s ongoing material compliance with the Executive’s obligations under Article “5” hereinbelow, continue to provide and pay to the Executive:

  (a)

the Outstanding Fees and Bonuses in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(a)” hereinabove;

     
  (b)

the Outstanding Expense Reimbursements in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(b)” hereinabove;

     
  (c)

the Outstanding Vacation Pay in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(c)” hereinabove; and

     
  (d)

subject to the provisions of sections “4.6” and “4.7” hereinbelow, all of the Executive’s then unvested stock Options (as hereinafter defined), together with any other unvested options or equity awards granted by the Company to the Executive as of the Effective Termination Date, shall immediately terminate; such that any then only vested Options, options and equity awards are fully and immediately exercisable by the Executive’s estate for a period of one year from the Effective Termination Date;

such ongoing compensation representing the Executive’s clear and unequivocal severance package for the untimely and early termination of this Agreement prior to the completion of the Initial Term or any Renewal Period by reason of the Executive’s death or disability.

3.6          Termination by the Company with Just Cause . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by the Company with Just Cause at any time during the Initial Term or any Renewal Period by the Company’s delivery to the Executive of written notice of its intention to terminate (the “ Notice of Termination ” herein). In such case, the “ Effective Termination Date ” being the later of the date specified in the Notice of Termination and the date that is 30 calendar days after the date of delivery of such Notice of Termination. In any such event (i) the Executive will continue to provide the General Services until the Effective Termination Date and (ii) the Company will, subject to the Executive’s ongoing material compliance with the Executive’s obligations under Article “5” hereinbelow, continue to provide and pay to the Executive:


  (a)

the outstanding Fees in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(a)” hereinabove;

     
  (b)

the Outstanding Expense Reimbursements in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(b)” hereinabove; and

     
  (c)

the Outstanding Vacation Pay in the manner and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in subsection “3.2(c)” hereinabove;

such ongoing compensation representing the Executive’s clear and unequivocal severance package for the early termination by the Company with Just Cause under this Agreement prior to the completion of the Initial Term or any Renewal Period; it being acknowledged and agreed that all Options (vested and unvested) and Benefits will immediately terminate on such Effective Termination Date.

3.7          Effect of Termination . Terms of this Agreement relating to accounting, payments, confidentiality, accountability for damages or claims and all other matters reasonably extending beyond the terms of this Agreement and to the benefit of the Parties hereto or for the protection of the Business interests of the Company shall survive the termination of this Agreement. In addition, and without limiting the foregoing, each of sections “3.2”, “3.3”, “3.4”, “3.5”, “3.6”, “3.7” and “5.3” and Articles “9” and “10” herein shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

Article 4
COMPENSATION OF THE EXECUTIVE

4.1          Fee . It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Executive shall render the General Services during the Initial Term and during any Renewal Period and the Company shall compensate the Executive by way of the payment by the Company to the Executive, or to the further order or direction of the Executive as the Executive may determine (in the Executive’s sole and absolute discretion) and advised to the Company of prior to such payment, of the gross monthly fee of U.S. $20,833.33 (the “ Fee ”; being an aggregate yearly fee of U.S. $250,000.00) . The Company shall pay such Fees to the Executive (or to the Executive’s designee, as provided above) on a bi-monthly basis, with an amount equal to one-half of such Fee being paid on each of the fifteenth and thirtieth day of each month during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period.

4.2          Payment of Fee and status as a taxable employee . It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Executive will be classified as a taxable employee of the Company for all purposes, such that all compensation which is provided by the Company to the Executive under this Agreement, or otherwise, will be calculated on a net-of-tax Fee and any benefits basis for which all statutory taxes will first be deducted by the Company and remitted on behalf of the Company and the Executive to the appropriate taxing authorities.

4.3          Bonus Payments . It is hereby acknowledged that the Board of Directors will, in good faith, consider the payment of reasonable industry standard annual bonuses (each being a “ Bonus ”) based upon the performance of the Company and upon the achievement by the Executive and/or the Company of reasonable management objectives to be reasonably established by the Board of Directors (after reviewing proposals with respect thereto defined by the Executive prior to the beginning of the relevant Company year). These management objectives will consist of both financial and subjective goals and will be specified in writing by the Board of Directors, and a copy will be given to the Executive prior to the commencement of the applicable year. The payment of any such Bonus will be payable within 120 calendar days of the ensuing year after any calendar year commencing on the Effective Date. Any dispute relating to any Bonus will be resolved by arbitration in accordance with Article “9” hereinbelow.


- 10 -

4.4          Reimbursement of Expenses . It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Company will reimburse the Executive for all pre-approved direct and reasonable expenses actually and properly incurred by the Executive for the benefit of the Company (collectively, the “ Expenses ”). Such reimbursements are payable by the Company to the order, direction and account of the Executive as the Executive may designate in writing, from time to time, in the Executive’s sole and absolute discretion, as soon as reasonably possible after the delivery by the Executive to the Company of written substantiation on account of each such reimbursable Expense.

4.5          Paid Vacation . It is hereby also acknowledged and agreed that, during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period, the Executive is entitled to four weeks paid vacation (collectively, the “ Vacation ”), to be taken at a time or times which are approved by the President of the Company (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld); provided, however, that the President may take into account the operational requirements of the Company and the need for the timely performance by the Executive of the General Services in connection with such approval; and provided, further, that such weeks shall not be taken consecutively. Unused Vacation may not be carried over after the completion of each calendar year during the continuance of this Agreement, and any unused Vacation will be paid out in cash by the Company to the Executive within 14 calendar days of the end of any such calendar year.

4.6          Options . Subject to the following and the provisions of section “4.7” hereinbelow, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Executive has already been granted, as contemplated by the Underlying Agreement, however, subject to the rules and policies of the Regulatory Authorities and applicable securities legislation and the terms and conditions of the Company’s existing stock incentive plan (the “ Option Plan ”), an initial incentive stock option (the “ Option ”) to purchase an aggregate of up to 300,000 common shares of the Company (each an “ Option Share ”), at an exercise price of U.S. $1.32 per Option Share, and vesting as to one-quarter of the Option (that being as to an initial 75,000 Option Shares) on the day which was three months from the date of grant and vesting as to a further one-quarter of the Option on each day which was six, 12 and 18 months, respectively, from the date of grant, and for an entire exercise period of five years commencing on the date of grant.

It is hereby acknowledged that the initial Option granted to the Executive prior the Effective Date of this Agreement was negotiated as between the Parties in the context of the stage of development of the Company existing prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Correspondingly, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that any Options granted by the Company to the Executive shall be reviewed and renegotiated at the request of either Party on a reasonably consistent basis during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period and, in the event that the Parties cannot agree, then the number of Options shall be increased on an annual basis by the percentage which is the average percentage of all increases to management stock options within the Company during the previous 12-month period; and in each case on similar and reasonable exercise terms and conditions. Any dispute respecting either the effectiveness or magnitude of the final number and terms hereunder shall be determined by arbitration in accordance with Article “9” hereinbelow.

4.7          Options subject to the following provisions . In this regard, and subject also to the following, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the exercise of any such Options shall be subject, at all times, to such vesting and resale provisions as may then be contained in the Company’s Option Plan and as may be finally determined by the Board of Directors, acting reasonably. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, it is hereby also acknowledged and agreed that, in the event that this Agreement is terminated in accordance with either of sections “3.6” or “5.3” herein; such that no Options Extension or any portion thereof is then available to the Executive; such portion of the within and remaining Options which shall have then not been exercised on the determined Effective Termination Date shall, notwithstanding the remaining exercise period of the Option(s), then be immediately terminated with no right of exercise by the Executive following such Effective Termination Date. In this regard, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of each final form of Option agreement, the Parties hereby also acknowledge and agree that:


- 11 -

  (a)

Registration of Option Shares under the Options : the Company will use reasonable commercial efforts to file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ SEC ”) a registration statement on Form S-8 (the “ Form S-8 Registration Statement ”) within 90 calendar days after the Effective Date hereof covering the issuance of all Option Shares of the Company underlying the then issued Options, and such Form S-8 Registration Statement shall comply with all requirements of the United States Securities Act of 1933 , as amended (the “ Securities Act ”). In this regard the Company shall use its best efforts to ensure that the Form S-8 Registration Statement remains effective as long as such Options are outstanding, and the Executive fully understands and acknowledges that these Option Shares will be issued in reliance upon the exemption afforded under the Form S-8 Registration Statement which is available only if the Executive acquires such Option Shares for investment and not with a view to distribution. The Executive is familiar with the phrase “acquired for investment and not with a view to distribution” as it relates to the Securities Act and the special meaning given to such term in various releases of the SEC;

     
  (b)

Section 16 compliance : the Company shall ensure that all grants of Options are made to ensure compliance with all applicable provisions of the exemption afforded under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 , as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”). Without limiting the foregoing, the Company shall have an independent committee of the Board of Directors approve each grant of Options to the Executive and, if required, by the applicable Regulatory Authorities and the shareholders of the Company. The Company shall file, on behalf of the Executive, all reports required to filed with the SEC pursuant to the requirements of Section 16(a) under the Exchange Act and applicable rules and regulations;

     
  (c)

Disposition of any Option Shares : the Executive further acknowledges and understands that, without in anyway limiting the acknowledgements and understandings as set forth hereinabove, the Executive agrees that the Executive shall in no event make any disposition of all or any portion of the Option Shares which the Executive may acquire hereunder unless and until:


  (i)

there is then in effect a “ Registration Statement ” under the Securities Act covering such proposed disposition and such disposition is made in accordance with said Registration Statement; or

     
  (ii)

(A) the Executive shall have notified the Company of the proposed disposition and shall have furnished the Company with a detailed statement of the circumstances surrounding the proposed disposition, (B) the Executive shall have furnished the Company with an opinion of the Executive’s own counsel to the effect that such disposition will not require registration of any such Option Shares under the Securities Act and (C) such opinion of the Executive’s counsel shall have been concurred in by counsel for the Company and the Company shall have advised the Executive of such concurrence; and



- 12 -

  (d)

Payment for any Option Shares : it is hereby further acknowledged and agreed that, during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period, the Executive shall be entitled to exercise any Option granted hereunder and pay for the same by way of the prior agreement of the Executive, in the Executive’s sole and absolute discretion, and with the prior knowledge of the Company, to settle any indebtedness which may be due and owing by the Company under this Agreement in payment for the exercise price of any Option Shares acquired thereunder. In this regard, and subject to further discussion as between the Company and the Executive, together with the prior approval of the Board of Directors and the establishment by the Company of a new Option Plan predicated upon the same, it is envisioned that, when the Company is in a position to afford the same, the Company may adopt certain additional “cashless exercise” provisions respecting the granting and exercise of incentive stock options during the continuance of this Agreement.

4.8          Benefits . It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that, during the continuance of this Agreement, the Executive shall be entitled to participate fully in the Company’s current extended health plan (the “ Benefits ”) at the Company’s expense for any and all such Benefits from time to time.

Article 5
ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE

5.1          Reporting . At such time or times as may be required by the Board of Directors, acting reasonably, the Executive will provide the Board of Directors with such information concerning the results of the Executive’s General Services and activities hereunder for the previous month as the Board of Directors may reasonably require.

5.2          Opinions, reports and advice of the Executive . The Executive acknowledges and agrees that all written and oral opinions, reports, advice and materials provided by the Executive to the Company in connection with the Executive’s engagement hereunder are intended solely for the Company’s benefit and for the Company’s uses only, and that any such written and oral opinions, reports, advice and information are the exclusive property of the Company. In this regard the Executive covenants and agrees that the Company may utilize any such opinion, report, advice and materials for any other purpose whatsoever and, furthermore, may reproduce, disseminate, quote from and refer to, in whole or in part, at any time and in any manner, any such opinion, report, advice and materials in the Company’s sole and absolute discretion. The Executive further covenants and agrees that no public references to the Executive or disclosure of the Executive’s role in respect of the Company may be made by the Executive without the prior written consent of the Board of Directors in each specific instance and, furthermore, that any such written opinions, reports, advice or materials shall, unless otherwise required by the Board of Directors, be provided by the Executive to the Company in a form and with such substance as would be acceptable for filing with and approval by any Regulatory Authority having jurisdiction over the affairs of the Company from time to time.

5.3          Executive’s business conduct . The Executive warrants that the Executive shall conduct the business and other activities in a manner which is lawful and reputable and which brings good repute to the Company, the Company’s business interests and the Executive. In particular, and in this regard, the Executive specifically warrants to provide the General Services in a sound and professional manner as set by the specifications of the Company. In the event that the Board of Directors has a reasonable concern that the business as conducted by the Executive is being conducted in a way contrary to law or is reasonably likely to bring disrepute to the business interests or to the Company’s or the Executive’s reputation, the Company may require in writing to the Executive that the Executive make such alterations in the Executive’s business conduct as the Board of Directors may reasonably require, in its sole and absolute discretion. If the Executive does not make such alterations in a reasonable period of time, then the Company, in its sole and absolute discretion, may terminate this Agreement by providing prior written notice to the Executive (the “ Notice of Termination ” herein). In such case, the “ Effective Termination Date ” being the later of the date specified in the Notice of Termination and the date that is 30 calendar days after the date of delivery of such Notice of Termination. In any such event (i) the Executive will continue to provide the General Services until the Effective Termination Date and (ii) the Company will (A) continue to provide and pay to the Executive all Outstanding Fees and Bonuses payable to the Executive under Article “4” hereinbelow until the Effective Termination Date and (B) pay to the Executive, within 14 calendar days of the Effective Termination Date, any amounts owed in connection with any Outstanding Expense Reimbursements and Outstanding Vacation Pay. In the event of any debate or dispute as to the reasonableness of the Board of Directors’ request or requirements, the judgment of the Board of Directors shall be deemed correct until such time as the matter has been determined by arbitration in accordance with Article “9” hereinbelow.


- 13 -

5.4          Right of ownership to the business and related Property . The Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees that any and all Company Business interests, together with any products or improvements derived therefrom and any trademarks or trade names used in connection with the same (collectively, the “ Property ”), are wholly owned and controlled by the Company. Correspondingly, neither this Agreement, nor the operation of the business contemplated by this Agreement, confers or shall be deemed to confer upon the Executive any interest whatsoever in and to any of the Property. In this regard the Executive hereby further covenants and agrees not to, during or after the Initial Term and the continuance of this Agreement, contest the title to any of the Property interests, in any way dispute or impugn the validity of the Property interests or take any action to the detriment of the Company’s interests therein. The Executive acknowledges that, by reason of the unique nature of the Property interests, and by reason of the Executive’s knowledge of and association with the Property interests during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period, the aforesaid covenant, both during the Initial Term of this Agreement and thereafter, is reasonable and commensurate for the protection of the legitimate business interests of the Company. As a final note, the Executive hereby further covenants and agrees to immediately notify the Company of any infringement of or challenge to any of the Property interests as soon as the Executive becomes aware of the infringement or challenge.

In addition, and for even greater certainty, the Executive hereby assigns to the Company the entire right, title and interest throughout the world in and to all work performed, writings, formulas, designs, models, drawings, photographs, design inventions, and other inventions, made, conceived, or reduced to practice or authored by the Executive or the Executive’s employees, either solely or jointly with others, during the performance of this Agreement, or which are made, conceived, or reduced to practice, or authored with the use of information or materials of the Company either received or used by the Executive during the performance of this Agreement or any extension or renewal thereof. The Executive shall promptly disclose to the Company all works, writings, formulas, designs, models, photographs, drawings, design inventions and other inventions made, conceived or reduced to practice, or authored by the Executive or the Executive’s employees as set forth above. The Executive shall sign, execute and acknowledge, or cause to be signed, executed and acknowledged without cost to Company or its nominees, patent, trademark or copyright protection throughout the world upon all such works, writings, formulas, designs, models, drawings, photographs, design inventions and other inventions; title to which the Company acquires in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Executive has acquired or shall acquire from each of the Executive’s employees, if any, the necessary rights to all such works, writings, formulas, designs, models, drawings, photographs, design inventions and other inventions made by such employees within the scope of their employment by the Executive in performing the General Services under this Agreement. The Executive shall obtain the cooperation of each such employee to secure to the Company or its nominees the rights to such works, writings, formulas, designs, models, drawings, photographs, design inventions and other inventions as the Company may acquire in accordance with the provisions of this section. The work performed and the information produced under this Agreement are works made for hire as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101.


- 14 -

Article 6
ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES

6.1          No conflict by the Executive . Subject to the following exception, during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period the Executive shall not engage in any business or activity which reasonably may detract from or conflict with the Executive’s duties and obligations to the Company as set forth in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Company. In this regard it is hereby acknowledged and agreed by the Parties that the Consultant is presently engaged as the Vice President of Commercial for Uranium Participation Corp. and, in such capacity, will be providing various services which will be deemed, under all circumstances, to not be in conflict with the Executive’s duties and obligations to the Company hereunder.

In addition, during the Initial Term and any Renewal Period, and for a period of three months following the termination of this Agreement in accordance with either of sections “3.2”, “3.3”, “3.4”, “3.5”, “3.6” or “5.3” hereunder, the Executive shall not engage in any uranium exploration or development business or activity whatsoever which reasonably may be determined by the Board of Directors, in its sole and absolute discretion, to compete with any portion of the Company’s Business interests as contemplated hereby without the prior written consent of the Company.

6.2          Non-circumvention by the Parties . Each of the Parties hereby acknowledges and agrees, for a period of three months following the termination of this Agreement in accordance with either of sections “3.2”, “3.3”, “3.4”, “3.5”, “3.6” or “5.3” hereunder, not to initiate any contact or communication directly with either of the other Party or any of its respective subsidiaries, as the case may be, together with each of the other Party’s respective directors, officers, representatives, agents or employees, without the prior written consent of the other Party and, notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, further acknowledges and agrees, even with the prior written consent of the other Party to such contact or communication, to limit such contact or communication to discussions outside the scope of any confidential information (as hereinafter determined).

6.3          Breach by the Parties . For the purposes of sections “6.1” and “6.2” herein, the Parties hereby recognize and agree that a breach a Party of any of the covenants therein contained would result in irreparable harm and significant damage to the other Party that would not be adequately compensated for by monetary award. Accordingly, each of the Parties agrees that, in the event of any such breach, in addition to being entitled as a matter of right to apply to a Court of competent equitable jurisdiction for relief by way of restraining order, injunction, decree or otherwise as may be appropriate to ensure compliance with the provisions hereof, a Party will also be liable to the other Party, as liquidated damages, for an amount equal to the amount received and earned by that Party as a result of and with respect to any such breach. The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that if any of the aforesaid restrictions, activities, obligations or periods are considered by a Court of competent jurisdiction as being unreasonable, the Parties agree that said Court shall have authority to limit such restrictions, activities or periods as the Court deems proper in the circumstances. In addition, the Parties further acknowledge and agree that all restrictions or obligations in this Agreement are necessary and fundamental to the protection of their respective business interests and are reasonable and valid, and all defenses to the strict enforcement thereof by the Parties are hereby waived.


- 15 -

6.4          Confidentiality . Each Party will not, except as authorized or required by its respective duties and obligations hereunder, reveal or divulge to any person, company or entity any information concerning the respective organization, business, finances, transactions or other affairs of the other Party, or of any of the other Party’s respective subsidiaries, which may come to the Party’s knowledge during the continuance of this Agreement, and each Party will keep in complete secrecy all confidential information entrusted to the Party and will not use or attempt to use any such information in any manner which may injure or cause loss either directly or indirectly to the other Party’s respective business interests. This restriction will continue to apply after the termination of this Agreement without limit in point of time but will cease to apply to information or knowledge which may come into the public domain.

6.5          Compliance with applicable laws . Each Party will comply with all U.S., Canadian and foreign laws, whether federal, provincial or state, applicable to its respective duties and obligations hereunder and, in addition, hereby represents and warrants that any information which the Party may provide to any person or company hereunder will, to the best of the Party’s knowledge, information and belief, be accurate and complete in all material respects and not misleading, and will not omit to state any fact or information which would be material to such person or company.

Article 7
INDEMNIFICATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

7.1          Indemnification . The Parties hereby each agree to indemnify and save harmless the other Party and including, where applicable, their respective subsidiaries and affiliates and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants and agents (each such party being an “ Indemnified Party ”) harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, actions, suits, proceedings, damages, liabilities or expenses of whatever nature or kind and including, without limitation, any investigation expenses incurred by any Indemnified Party, to which an Indemnified Party may become subject by reason of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.2 No indemnification . This indemnity will not apply in respect of an Indemnified Party in the event and to the extent that a Court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgment shall determine that the Indemnified Party was grossly negligent or guilty of willful misconduct. 7.3 Claim of indemnification . The Parties agree to waive any right they might have of first requiring the Indemnified Party to proceed against or enforce any other right, power, remedy, security or claim payment from any other person before claiming this indemnity.

7.4          Notice of claim . In case any action is brought against an Indemnified Party in respect of which indemnity may be sought against either of the Parties, the Indemnified Party will give both Parties prompt written notice of any such action of which the Indemnified Party has knowledge and the relevant Party will undertake the investigation and defense thereof on behalf of the Indemnified Party, including the prompt employment of counsel acceptable to the Indemnified Party affected and the relevant Party and the payment of all expenses. Failure by the Indemnified Party to so notify shall not relieve the relevant Party of such relevant Party’s obligation of indemnification hereunder unless (and only to the extent that) such failure results in a forfeiture by the relevant Party of substantive rights or defenses.


- 16 -

7.5          Settlement . No admission of liability and no settlement of any action shall be made without the consent of each of the Parties and the consent of the Indemnified Party affected, such consent not to be unreasonable withheld.

7.6          Legal proceedings . Notwithstanding that the relevant Party will undertake the investigation and defense of any action, an Indemnified Party will have the right to employ separate counsel in any such action and participate in the defense thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel will be at the expense of the Indemnified Party unless:

  (a)

such counsel has been authorized by the relevant Party;

     
  (b)

the relevant Party has not assumed the defense of the action within a reasonable period of time after receiving notice of the action;

     
  (c)

the named parties to any such action include that any Party hereto and the Indemnified Party shall have been advised by counsel that there may be a conflict of interest between any Party and the Indemnified Party; or

     
  (d)

there are one or more legal defenses available to the Indemnified Party which are different from or in addition to those available to any Party.

7.7          Contribution . If for any reason other than the gross negligence or bad faith of the Indemnified Party being the primary cause of the loss claim, damage, liability, cost or expense, the foregoing indemnification is unavailable to the Indemnified Party or insufficient to hold them harmless, the relevant Party shall contribute to the amount paid or payable by the Indemnified Party as a result of any and all such losses, claim, damages or liabilities in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect not only the relative benefits received by the relevant Party on the one hand and the Indemnified Party on the other, but also the relative fault of relevant Party and the Indemnified Party and other equitable considerations which may be relevant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the relevant Party shall in any event contribute to the amount paid or payable by the Indemnified Party, as a result of the loss, claim, damage, liability, cost or expense (other than a loss, claim, damage, liability, cost or expenses, the primary cause of which is the gross negligence or bad faith of the Indemnified Party), any excess of such amount over the amount of the fees actually received by the Indemnified Party hereunder.

Article 8
FORCE MAJEURE

8.1          Events . If either Party is at any time either during this Agreement or thereafter prevented or delayed in complying with any provisions of this Agreement by reason of strikes, walk-outs, labor shortages, power shortages, fires, wars, acts of God, earthquakes, storms, floods, explosions, accidents, protests or demonstrations by environmental lobbyists or native rights groups, delays in transportation, breakdown of machinery, inability to obtain necessary materials in the open market, unavailability of equipment, governmental regulations restricting normal operations, shipping delays or any other reason or reasons beyond the control of that Party, then the time limited for the performance by that Party of its respective obligations hereunder shall be extended by a period of time equal in length to the period of each such prevention or delay.


- 17 -

8.2          Notice . A Party shall within three calendar days give notice to the other Party of each event of force majeure under section “8.1” hereinabove, and upon cessation of such event shall furnish the other Party with notice of that event together with particulars of the number of days by which the obligations of that Party hereunder have been extended by virtue of such event of force majeure and all preceding events of force majeure .

Article 9
ARBITRATION

9.1          Matters for arbitration . Except for urgent matters as necessary to prevent material harm to a substantive right or asset, the Parties agree that all questions or matters in dispute with respect to this Agreement shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the terms hereof.

9.2          Notice . It shall be a condition precedent to the right of any Party to submit any matter to arbitration pursuant to the provisions hereof that any Party intending to refer any matter to arbitration shall have given not less than five business days’ prior written notice of its intention to do so to the other Parties together with particulars of the matter in dispute. On the expiration of such five Business Days the Party who gave such notice may proceed to refer the dispute to arbitration as provided for in section “9.3” hereinbelow.

9.3          Appointments . The Party desiring arbitration shall appoint one arbitrator, and shall notify the other Parties of such appointment, and the other Parties shall, within five Business Days after receiving such notice, appoint an arbitrator, and the two arbitrators so named, before proceeding to act, shall, within five Business Days of the appointment of the last appointed arbitrator, unanimously agree on the appointment of a third arbitrator, to act with them and be chairperson of the arbitration herein provided for. If the other Parties shall fail to appoint an arbitrator within five Business Days after receiving notice of the appointment of the first arbitrator, and if the two arbitrators appointed by the Parties shall be unable to agree on the appointment of the chairperson, the chairperson shall be appointed in accordance with the Arbitration Rules. Except as specifically otherwise provided in this section, the arbitration herein provided for shall be conducted in accordance with such Arbitration Rules. The chairperson shall fix a time and place in the City of Corpus Christi, State of Texas, U.S.A., for the purpose of hearing the evidence and representations of the Parties, and the chairperson shall preside over the arbitration and determine all questions of procedure not provided for by the Arbitration Rules or this section. After hearing any evidence and representations that the Parties may submit, the single arbitrator, or the arbitrators, as the case may be, shall make an award and reduce the same to writing, and deliver one copy thereof to each of the Parties. The expense of the arbitration shall be paid as specified in the award.

9.4          Award . The Parties agree that the award of a majority of the arbitrators shall be final and binding upon each of them.

Article 10
GENERAL PROVISIONS

10.1         No assignment . This Agreement may not be assigned by any Party except with the prior written consent of the other Party.


- 18 -

10.2         Notice . Each notice, demand or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by prepaid registered mail deposited in a recognized post office and addressed to the Party entitled to receive the same, or delivered to such Party, at the address for such Party specified on the introductory paragraphs of this Agreement. The date of receipt of such notice, demand or other communication shall be the date of delivery thereof if delivered, or, if given by registered mail as aforesaid, shall be deemed conclusively to be the third Business Day after the same shall have been so mailed, except in the case of interruption of postal services for any reason whatsoever, in which case the date of receipt shall be the date on which the notice, demand or other communication is actually received by the addressee. Any Party may at any time and from time to time notify the other Parties in writing of a change of address and the new address to which notice shall be given to it thereafter until further change.

10.3         Time of the essence . Time will be of the essence of this Agreement.

10.4         Enurement . This Agreement will enure to the benefit of and will be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, executors, administrators and assigns.

10.5         Currency . Unless otherwise stipulated, all payments required to be made pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement and all money amount references contained herein are in lawful currency of the United States.

10.6         Further assurances . The Parties will from time to time after the execution of this Agreement make, do, execute or cause or permit to be made, done or executed, all such further and other acts, deeds, things, devices and assurances in law whatsoever as may be required to carry out the purposes of and to give full force and effect to this Agreement.

10.7         Representation and costs . It is hereby acknowledged by each of the Parties hereto that McMillan LLP, Lawyers – Patent & Trade Mark Agents, acts solely for the Company, and, correspondingly, that the Executive has been required by each of McMillan LLP and the Company to obtain independent legal advice with respect to its review and execution of this Agreement. In addition, it is hereby further acknowledged and agreed by the Parties hereto that McMillan LLP, and certain or all of its principal owners or associates, from time to time, may have both an economic or shareholding interest in and to Company and/or a fiduciary duty to the same arising from either a directorship, officership or similar relationship arising out of the request of the Company for certain of such persons to act in a similar capacity while acting for the Company as counsel. Correspondingly, and even where, as a result of this Agreement, the consent of each Party to the role and capacity of McMillan LLP, and its principal owners and associates, as the case may be, is deemed to have been received, where any conflict or perceived conflict may arise, or be seen to arise, as a result of any such capacity or representation, each Party hereto acknowledges and agrees to, once more, obtain independent legal advice in respect of any such conflict or perceived conflict and, consequent thereon, McMillan LLP, together with any such principal owners or associates, as the case may be, shall be at liberty at any time to resign any such position if it or any Party hereto is in any way affected or uncomfortable with any such capacity or representation. Each Party to this Agreement will also bear and pay its own costs, legal and otherwise, in connection with its respective preparation, review and execution of this Agreement and, in particular, that the costs involved in the preparation of this Agreement, and all documentation necessarily incidental thereto, by McMillan LLP, shall be at the cost of the Company.

10.8         GOVERNING LAW; VENUE . THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS (WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ITS CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES) GOVERN ALL MATTERS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING ITS INTERPRETATION, CONSTRUCTION, PERFORMANCE AND ENFORCEMENT. WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTERS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OTHER THAN THOSE MATTERS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE “9”, ANY PARTY MAY BRING THE RELATED LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY COURT SITTING IN CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, U.S.A. EACH PARTY CONSENTS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF SUCH COURTS SITTING IN CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF ALL SUCH LEGAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE “9”.


- 19 -

10.9         Severability and construction . Each Article, section, paragraph, term and provision of this Agreement, and any portion thereof, shall be considered severable, and if, for any reason, any portion of this Agreement is determined to be invalid, contrary to or in conflict with any applicable present or future law, rule or regulation in a final unappealable ruling issued by any court, agency or tribunal with valid jurisdiction in a proceeding to which any Party is a party, that ruling shall not impair the operation of, or have any other effect upon, such other portions of this Agreement as may remain otherwise intelligible (all of which shall remain binding on the Parties and continue to be given full force and effect as of the date upon which the ruling becomes final).

10.10         Captions . The captions, section numbers and Article numbers appearing in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit, construe or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement nor in any way affect this Agreement. 10.11         Counterparts . This Agreement may be signed by the Parties in as many counterparts as may be necessary, and via facsimile, e-mail or other means of electronic transmission if necessary, each of which so signed being deemed to be an original and such counterparts together constituting one and the same instrument and, notwithstanding the date of execution, being deemed to bear the Effective Date as set forth in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement.

10.12        No partnership or agency . The Parties have not created a partnership and nothing contained in this Agreement shall in any manner whatsoever constitute any Party the partner, agent or legal representative of the other Parties, nor create any fiduciary relationship between them for any purpose whatsoever.

10.13        Amendment . This Agreement may only be amended, modified or supplemented by an agreement in writing signed by each Party.

10.14        Consents and waivers . No consent or waiver expressed or implied by either Party in respect of any breach or default by the other in the performance by such other of its obligations hereunder shall:

  (a)

be valid unless it is in writing and stated to be a consent or waiver pursuant to this section;

     
  (b)

be relied upon as a consent to or waiver of any other breach or default of the same or any other obligation;

     
  (c)

constitute a general waiver under this Agreement; or

     
  (d)

eliminate or modify the need for a specific consent or waiver pursuant to this section in any other or subsequent instance.

 

[ Signature page follows ]


- 20 -

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have hereunto set their respective hands and seals as at the execution date first written above.

The COMMON SEAL of )  
URANIUM ENERGY CORP. , )  
the Company herein, was hereunto affixed )  
in the presence of: ) (C/S)
  )  
  )  
/s/ Amir Adnani )  
Authorized Signatory )  
     
SIGNED, SEALED and DELIVERED by )  
SCOTT MELBYE , )  
the Executive herein, in the presence of: )  
  )  
  )  
/s/ Louise Melbye )  
Witness Signature ) /s/ Scott Melbye
  )                         SCOTT MELBYE
618 Cliffgate Lane, Castle Rock, CO 80108 )  
Witness Address )  
  )  
Louise Melbye – Homemaker )  
Witness Name and Occupation )  

__________


Schedule A

This is Schedule “A” to that certain Executive Services Agreement, dated for reference with an Effective Date of September 1, 2014, as entered into between Uranium Energy Corp. and Scott Melbye.

Underlying Agreement

Refer to the materials attached hereto .

__________

 

 

 





August 28, 2014 Delivered and via e-mail

Scott Melbye
8055 E. Tuffs Avenue, Suite 400
Denver, Colorado 80237

Dear Mr. Melbye:

Re:

Uranium Energy Corp. (the “Company”)
Letter of Intent Regarding Proposed Employment

This letter (the “ Letter of Intent ”) is intended to set out the basis upon which the Company is prepared to engage you (the “ Employee ”) as an employee. Specifically, the Company wishes to set out in this Letter of Intent the basic terms, if accepted by the Employee, upon which the Company is prepared to enter into a formal agreement (the “ Formal Agreement ”) between the Company and the Employee with respect to the terms of employment of the Employee by the Company.

The Formal Agreement shall have, among other terms to be agreed to by and between the Company and the Employee, the following terms:

Suite 320 - 1111 W. Hastings St. Vancouver BC V6E 2J3 | t (866) 748 1030 f (604) 682 3591 www.uraniumenergy.com NYSE MKT: UEC



 

This Letter of Intent is not intended to be a binding offer or to be a complete statement of the terms and conditions of the Formal Agreement referred to above, or to create any legally enforceable obligations of the parties.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please so indicate by executing this Letter of Intent, faxing or emailing a copy and returning the original signed to the undersigned. Upon receipt of your acceptance and agreement, the Company will prepare the Formal Agreement referenced above.

Yours very truly,

Uranium Energy Corp.

/s/ Amir Adnani

Per: Amir Adnani , President and CEO of the Company

ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT

The foregoing is hereby accepted and agreed to by the undersigned this 28 th day of August, 2014.

Signature: /s/ Scott Melbye
Name: Scott Melbye

Suite 320 - 1111 W. Hastings St. Vancouver BC V6E 2J3 | t (866) 748 1030 f (604) 682 3591 www.uraniumenergy.com NYSE MKT: UEC



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Amir Adnani, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2015 of Uranium Energy Corp.;

   
(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   
(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   
(4)

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


  (a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     
  (b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     
  (c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     
  (d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


(5)

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


  (a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     
  (b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 11, 2015

/s/ Amir Adnani
By: Amir Adnani
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director



Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Katsumata, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2015 of Uranium Energy Corp.;

   
(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   
(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   
(4)

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


  (a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     
  (b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     
  (c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     
  (d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


(5)

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


  (a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     
  (b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 11, 2015

/s/ Mark Katsumata
By: Mark Katsumata
Title: Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Amir Adnani, the Chief Executive Officer of Uranium Energy Corp., and Mark Katsumata, the Chief Financial Officer of Uranium Energy Corp., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Uranium Energy Corp., for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Uranium Energy Corp.

Date: March 11, 2015

/s/ Amir Adnani
Amir Adnani
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director

/s/ Mark Katsumata
Mark Katsumata
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Uranium Energy Corp. and will be retained by Uranium Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.